E-22010 DSM Evaluation Reports - Final Report - February 28, 2011 2/28/2011
16 passages
4 1 2 1 with measures installed Homeowners 5 2 1 1 1 28 8 11 2 1 1 5 Builders 12 4 8 4 1 3 Final energy audit, overall Homeowners 5 2 1 1 1 28 10 14 0 2 1 1 Scheduling and timing of Builders 12 5 6 1 3 1 audit Homeowners 5 1 2 1 28 14 9 1...
AI summary This document presents the final report of an impact and process evaluation for the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program 2010, submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes data on the number of measures installed, energy audits conducted, scheduling, and rebates provided by the program.
CFLs Finding Recommendation DI-F6. DI-R6. Nearly seven out of ten 2010 respondents (69%) reported that Consider adjusting incentive levels for CFLs. This they were aware of the benefits of CFLs; about two out of five may, for example, incl...
AI summary The DI program's findings show that a significant number of businesses were already aware of CFL benefits and had installed them before participating. However, even after participation, many businesses still had unoccupied screw-based sockets, indicating potential for further CFL installation.
thin the small business sector. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 2 Table 2-3: Types of Lighting Retrofits Offered Measure Offered 2008 2009 2010 13 watt mini-twister CFL Yes Yes Yes 16 watt min...
AI summary The 2010 Direct Install Program continued to offer efficient lighting retrofits, including CFLs and LED exit lights, and utilized local Chambers of Commerce and Business Improvement Areas for promotion. Word-of-mouth marketing reduced the need for outbound calling in 2009 and 2010.
25th, 2010 3 See Table 4-11. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 3
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, referencing Table 4-11 for data. The evaluation is conducted by NMR.
0.90 Refrigerated Area 2.00 Water to Air Heat Pump 4.21 Non-Electric 40.0 The following calculations were used in the instances that electric heating occurred in the space equipped with retrofitted lighting. However, the majority of sites...
AI summary The text discusses calculations for heating kWh and kW energy savings related to the retrofitted lighting in the Direct Install Program. It highlights the energy interaction factors between lighting and heating systems, with minimal impact from heating due to most sites being heated via oil or gas.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 14 Figure 3-1: Observed On-site versus Tracking System Savings
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, focusing on the comparison between observed on-site savings and tracking system savings as illustrated in Figure 3-1.
33 69 Average 27% 76% 29% 65% 30% 80% 36% 70% Question not asked in 2008; Unweighted data NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 32 4.7.2 CFLs Installed and Removed The majority of respondents (86%)...
AI summary The majority of respondents (86%) did not remove CFLs installed through the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. Of those who did, reasons included bulb failure, breaking, and negative perceptions. Disposal methods varied, with some discarding them and others storing them.
9 8 Insulation 16 8 8 Refrigeration 5 5 8 Scoping, feasibility, technical 5 7 4 assessments Solar hot water 4 Cooling 5 3 Applied for a grant 5 Motors 3 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 37 4.7....
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found that 82% of survey respondents used their new lighting about the same as the lighting that had been replaced, indicating stable usage behavior despite the efficiency improvements.
ogram tracking records. Nearly three out of five 2010 respondents (57%) reported having fewer than five employees; about three out of four (73%) reported having fewer than 10 employees. (Table 4-25) Table 4-25: Full-time Equivalent Workers...
AI summary The text provides statistics on the size of businesses participating in the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, noting that most had fewer than 10 employees and were independent businesses.
_) 99. Don‘t know NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page B3 9. What was the ONE most important reason your company / organization chose to participate in the program? (Do not read) 1. (To take advant...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about the reasons for participating in the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, with options such as taking advantage of program incentives, saving on energy costs, and reducing carbon footprint.
ded by contractor) 11. (Past participation in utility programs) 12. (Other (Please explain )) 99. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) 11. Prior to your company / organization participating in the Efficient Lighting Products Program were you aware th...
AI summary This section of the document contains survey questions related to prior awareness and participation in the Efficient Lighting Products Program, specifically focusing on the installation of CFLs and LED exit lights, as well as prior purchases of energy-efficient lighting products.
T-12 lighting with high efficiency lighting T-8s or T-5s 4. Metal Halide or High Pressure Sodium 5. Other (Specify: _) 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) 14c. Before participating in the Efficient Lighting Products Program, what percentage of yo...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to lighting products and participation in the Efficient Lighting Products Program, focusing on the percentage of screw-base light sockets and exit signs containing CFLs or incandescent lamps before and after program participation. It also references the Nova Scotia Power (NMR) and the evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program.
RANGE, RECORD MIDDLE VALUE, OR ROUND UP. IF ‗DON‘T KNOW,‘ PROBE FOR BEST GUESS TO NARROW IN ON A NUMBER.] [RECORD PERCENT] _% [999=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] 17. What percent of these compact fluorescent bulbs did you remove? Again, I‘m aski...
AI summary This section of the document asks respondents about the percentage of compact fluorescent bulbs removed from service through the Efficient Lighting Products Program and the reasons for removal. It also inquires about what was done with the removed bulbs.
t bulbs you removed? (Threw away) (Put them away, stored them) (Gave them away) (Installed them at another location) (Other [Specify _]) 9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall (IF Q15=1, Go to FR1) For the next few questions I would like you to think...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the removal and disposal of LED exit lights installed through the Efficient Lighting Products Program. Respondents are asked about the percentage of bulbs removed, reasons for removal, and what happened to the removed bulbs.
D LIST] Light Quality 1. (Bulb is too bright) 2. (Bulb is not bright enough) 3. (Don‘t like the overall quality of the light) 4. (Don‘t like the color of the light—it is too [SPECIFY: _]) Function/Performance 5. (Delay in light coming on)...
AI summary The text outlines customer feedback on the performance and satisfaction with LED Exit Lights installed under the Efficient Lighting Products Program. It includes categories such as light quality, function/performance, and physical limitations, with options for users to specify their concerns.
o to Q0] 9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall [If purchased and installed both CFLs and LED exit lights, Go to Q0, Else go to Q0] [IF Q0=YES] About what quantity of these additional CFLs did your company / organization purchase on its own since part...
AI summary The text is a survey questionnaire related to the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, asking participants about their purchase of CFLs and LED exit lights, the influence of the program on their decisions, and whether participation influenced other energy efficiency actions.