HomeEliadc TariffM12768Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Eliadc Tariff" in M12768

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control Tariff (ELIADC) - 2025 Annual Report
53 passages 18 documents

Eliadc Tariff across all matters →

N-1Annual Report - Redacted 6 passages
REDACTED p. pp. 0-2
REDACTED Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff – 2025 Annual Report Dear Ms. Henwood: Nova Scotia...

AI summary NS Power submitted the 2025 Annual Report for the ELIADC Tariff, which resulted in a benefit of $4.4 million to other customers in 2025. This benefit was calculated based on the minimum payment amount under the tariff and the load of PHP. The report was submitted in accordance with the Board's requirement for annual reporting.

Off-Schedule Summary p. p. 2
Off-Schedule Summary In 2025 there were 95 hours in which PHP chose to deviate from the submitted schedule (Code 5, "PDN") spread across 21 unique events (where a single event can span multiple hours). These PDN hours comprised 1.1 percent...

AI summary In 2025, PHP had 95 off-schedule hours (1.1% of total), leading to $706,609 system cost impact, with $529,957 reduced ADC credit. PHP's net balance is $149,304. Reasons included fulfilling orders, managing silo levels, and maintaining load.

Year # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code Total p. pp. 3-4
Year # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code # of Hours Cause Code Total 1 2 3 4 5 2020 243 234 714 385 193 1,769 2021 661 469 1,107 627 171 3,035 2022 1,060 454 926 751 466 3,657 2023 724 41...

AI summary The document presents a table summarizing cause code incident rates from 2020 to 2025, including the number of hours and percentages for each year and cause code. It also references the ELIADC Tariff Directives and Commitments from 2025 proceedings.

Preamble p. pp. 4-5
In its July 5, 2024 Letter, the Board accepted the 2023 ELIADC Tariff Report (M11588) and provided direction on the development of a successor ELIADC Tariff for which "the Board's expectation is that NS Power will file its application by M...

AI summary The Board accepted the 2023 ELIADC Tariff Report and directed NS Power to file a successor tariff by March 31, 2025. Bates White provided recommendations on improving the ELIADC Tariff, including better benefits calculation and reporting. NS Power accepted these recommendations, and the related audit hearing was held in March 2025, with the Board issuing a decision in October 2025.

REDACTED 2025 Annual ELIADC Tariff Report Page 1 of 3 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 7
REDACTED 2025 Annual ELIADC Tariff Report Page 1 of 3 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Inc. Annual FAM Reporting ELIADC Tariff Revenue

AI summary This document is the 2025 Annual ELIADC Tariff Report from Nova Scotia Power Inc., focusing on FAM reporting related to the ELIADC Tariff Revenue. Key details are redacted due to confidentiality.

REDACTED 2025 Annual ELIADC Tariff Report Page 2 of 3 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 7
REDACTED 2025 Annual ELIADC Tariff Report Page 2 of 3 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Inc. Annual FAM Reporting ELIADC Benefit Breakdown

AI summary The document presents a redacted section of the 2025 Annual ELIADC Tariff Report, focusing on Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Annual FAM Reporting ELIADC Benefit Breakdown. Key details are omitted due to confidentiality.

N-2NSPI (BW) RIR 1 to 10 - Redacted 3 passages
Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to BW Information Requests
Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to BW Information Requests 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 For each month of 2025, please provide: 4 5 (a) ELIADC Energy Charge 6 7 (b) CBL En...

AI summary The document outlines responses to information requests regarding the ELIADC Tariff 2025 Annual Report. It refers to specific pages in the report attachment for details on various charges and mentions a confidential attachment that has been removed due to confidentiality.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 For the NSPSO, data relevant to the administration or reporting of the ELIADC Tariff was 2 minimally impacted by the cyber incident. The web-based application used to maintain 3 System Operator logs was unavailable in th...

AI summary The NSPSO reported that data related to the ELIADC Tariff was minimally impacted by a cyber incident, though the web-based application for System Operator logs was unavailable initially, requiring manual logging. System Operator logs are critical for capturing system events and real-time dispatch actions.

Section 7
Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to BW Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines the Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report and includes NSPI's responses to information requests from the Board of Commissioners of the Energy and Utilities Regulation Board (BW).

N-3NSPI (IG) RIR 1 to 15 - Redacted 7 passages
Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to IG Information Requests p. pp. 1-13
Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to IG Information Requests 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 4 Reference: 2025 Annual Report, Exhibit N-1, p. 3/9, Table 1 5 (a) Please explain...

AI summary The response to IR-1 explains that the 2025 benefit of the ELIADC tariff is compared to the initial forecast of benefits from 2020 to 2023, which ranged from $6 to $13 million annually. The response also outlines the need to break down the $4.4 million benefit into fixed cost recovery and FAM application, and it requests an explanation of the factors influencing the positive ADC load shifting differential in 2025.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 1-13
NON-CONFIDENTIAL - 1 movement, consistent with NS Power's internal calculations of load shifting benefits of the - 2 ELIADC Tariff. Date Filed: May 8, 2026 NSPI (IG) IR-1 Page 4 of 4

AI summary The document references the ELIADC Tariff and mentions NS Power's internal calculations of load shifting benefits, filed on May 8, 2026.

2025 ELIADC IG IR-3 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 7
2025 ELIADC IG IR-3 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from a 2025 ELIADC Information Request (IR-3) and includes confidential information. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy load and incentive adjustment and distribution charge.

2025 ELIADC IG IR-3 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 10
2025 ELIADC IG IR-3 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from a 2025 ELIADC IG IR-3 proceeding, related to Nova Scotia Power Inc. and the Nova Scotia Energy Board. It includes confidential information and is part of a regulatory process involving energy load and incentive adjustments.

REDACTED p. p. 13
REDACTED 1 • Hourly Off-Schedule Charge = (PortOps modeled cost to serve x PHP load) - (CBL 2 Energy Charge x PHP load) 3 4 (b) The Off-Schedule Charge is neither a cost to customers (as PHP pays for its incremental 5 cost to serve) nor a...

AI summary The document discusses the Off-Schedule Charge under the ELIADC Tariff, explaining its role as an incentive for PHP to follow dispatch and its calculation based on the difference between metered and expected loads. It references the ADC Load Shifting Differential and its connection to the ELIADC Tariff and a 2025 report.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 13
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-10: 2 3 Has NSPI omitted any data, analysis or internal assessments from the Annual Report 4 regarding ELIADC operations in 2025 that were available to NSPI, on the basis that such 5 information will not be re...

AI summary NSPI was asked if it omitted any data or analysis from its Annual Report regarding ELIADC operations in 2025, based on the assumption that such information would not be required under a successor tariff. NSPI responded that it did not omit any information.

14 p. pp. 13-42
14 Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ELIADC Tariff Energy Sales (GWh) 875 966 957 670 766 691 Revenue ($M) 55.5 60.3 170.1 28.31 77.7 70.9 Revenue (ȼ per kWh) 6.3 6.2 17.8 4.2 10.1 10.3 Large Industrial Tariff Energy Sales (GWh) 726 759 7...

AI summary The 2022 ELIADC Tariff Annual Report and change in methodology for calculating the cost to serve PHP load was approved by the Board on July 5, 2023 (M11021), resulting in a $50.9 million adjustment to 2022 fuel recovery for the ELIADC Tariff.

N-4NSPI (SBA) RIR 1 to 4 1 passage
1 Request IR-1: p. p. 4
1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Refer to M12768, Exhibit N-1, NS Power's Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control 4 (ELIADC) Tariff – 2025 Annual Report – Redacted, dated March 26, 2026, (the "2025 5 Report"), which states, on page 2 at para 2: 6...

AI summary The 2025 Annual Report discusses the ELIADC Tariff, noting a positive ADC differential in 2025 due to the difference between forecast and actual CBL Energy Charge. This resulted in PHP being obligated to pay the full actual CBL cost to serve, including additional costs from variances in dispatch schedules, as outlined in the 'Minimum Payment' section of the ELIADC Tariff.

101475Board letter re: timeline for process 1 passage
M12768 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control Tariff – 2025 Annual Report p. p. 0
M12768 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control Tariff – 2025 Annual Report The Board acknowledges receipt of your letter dated March 26, 2026, enclosing NS Power's Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Contro...

AI summary The Board has received NS Power's 2025 Annual Report on the Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control Tariff and plans to allow interested parties to seek additional information and submit comments.

103394Decision letter 3 passages
Submissions
Submissions In its submission, Bates White noted that Port Hawkesbury Paper's load in 2025 was 690,763 MWh, which was about 15% below the consumption forecast by Port Hawkesbury Paper. Bates White also noted the positive ADC differential i...

AI summary Bates White reviewed Port Hawkesbury Paper's 2025 load and ADC differential, noting discrepancies between forecast and actual consumption. NS Power charges 75% of incremental system costs from off-schedule events, which are netted against ADC differential accruals. Bates White raised concerns about the tariff's performance and NS Power's refund policy for incremental costs. FAM Audit compliance was also mentioned.

Reply Submissions
Reply Submissions Port Hawkesbury Paper, in its reply submissions, requested that the 2025 ELIADC tariff report be approved as filed. Port Hawkesbury Paper noted there is no cause for concern regarding the Cause Code 5 hours since the 95 h...

AI summary Port Hawkesbury Paper requests approval of the 2025 ELIADC tariff report, noting that the low Cause Code 5 hours and issues related to load forecast revisions and interest on post-year-end balances should be addressed in the new tariff proceeding (M12661). NS Power defends the ELIADC tariff, stating that market conditions, not design flaws, caused the variance between forecast and actual results and that the tariff is an annual settlement mechanism.

Board Findings
Board Findings In its decision in Matter M09420, the Board directed NS Power to file annual assessment results as required under the terms of the ELIADC tariff. Specifically, the approved tariff states: Annually, NS Power shall report to t...

AI summary The Board accepts the ELIADC results from NS Power's 2025 Annual Report but reiterates concerns about delays in providing enhanced quantification of load shifting benefits and costs. NS Power is directed to provide a firm date for analysis delivery by September 15, 2026, and to improve reporting transparency.

101383Confidential Undertaking 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff – 2025 Annual Report

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is addressing two matters: the Public Utilities Act and the 2025 Annual Report on the Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff. The document outlines regulatory proceedings related to energy policies and tariff reporting in Nova Scotia.

101475Board letter re: timeline for process 1 passage
M12768 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control Tariff – 2025 Annual Report p. p. 0
M12768 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control Tariff – 2025 Annual Report The Board acknowledges receipt of your letter dated March 26, 2026, enclosing NS Power's Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Contro...

AI summary The Board has received NS Power's 2025 Annual Report on the Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff and plans to solicit additional information and submissions from interested parties.

101622IG (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-15 1 passage
1 2 3 4 2026
(b) Please provide a copy of any FAM SWG presentation materials and 1 2 3 4 2026 M12768 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended 5 6 7 IN THE MATTER OF: Extra Large Industrial Act...

AI summary The Industrial Group has requested information from Nova Scotia Power Incorporated regarding the 2025 Annual Report, specifically about the ELIADC tariff, benefits reported, cost recovery, and factors influencing ADC load shifting differentials.

101624SBA (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-4 3 passages
Preamble
Refer to M12768, Exhibit N-1, NS Power's Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff – 2025 Annual Report – Redacted, dated March 26, 2026, (the "2025 Report"), which states, on page 2 at para 2: In 2025, the difference be...

AI summary The 2025 Report discusses the ELIADC Tariff, noting a positive ADC differential due to stable fuel pricing and flexibility of the service. It also references challenges from a cyber incident affecting NS Power's operations and asks whether these challenges remain in 2026.

Request IR-3:
Request IR-3: Refer to the 2025 Report, section ELIADC Tariff Directives and Commitments from 2025 Proceedings, 1. 2022-2023 FAM Audit Report Recommendation XV-1, on page 7: a) Please provide an example of the overlapping, incomparable dis...

AI summary Request IR-3 seeks clarification on overlapping and incomparable dispatch results in the ELIADC Tariff Directives and Commitments from 2025 Proceedings. It includes questions about the scope of conflicting positions, model precision tolerance, load increments, modeling capabilities, and software limitations.

Request IR-4:
Request IR-4: - Refer to the 2025 Report, section ELIADC Tariff Directives and Commitments from 2025 Proceedings, 3. 2022-2023 FAM Audit Report Recommendation XV-3, at pages 8-9, which states: - … The Company has implemented additional rep...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the restoration timing of key data and platforms (PI, PortOps) affecting load shifting benefit analysis, the timing of discussions with the FAM Small Working Group, and whether load shifting benefits and costs will be added to FAM reports.

101626Bates White (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-10 1 passage
Request IR-4:
Request IR-4: - Please refer to PDF page 3, "Operation Summary." - a. Did the cyber event have any impact on the process by which NSPI schedules PHP's hourly load? Please explain. - b. Please explain the NSPSO's role in helping to administ...

AI summary Request IR-4 asks about the impact of a cyber event on NSPI's load scheduling, the NSPSO's role in administering the ELIADC Tariff, and data availability related to the tariff. Request IR-5 inquires about the financial implications of lower-than-forecasted demand on system costs.

102230Submission - BW 4 passages
Section 1 p. p. 0
May 29, 2026 Delivered by e-mail Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Vincent Musco Bates White Economic Consulting Via e-mail Subject...

AI summary This document discusses the 2025 Annual Report on the ELIADC Tariff by Nova Scotia Power, Inc. It highlights that the actual cost to serve Port Hawkesbury Paper was below the forecasted cost, resulting in a positive ADC differential. The report also notes that PHP's load was 15% below its forecast due to challenges in forecasting energy demand in the paper market.

Section 2 p. p. 0
l of an Above-the-Line Tariff Applicable to Port Hawkesbury Paper: Direct Evidence of Port Hawkesbury Paper," M12661, February 20, 2026, page 10 lines 1 to 3. 3 2025 Annual Report, page 2. 4 2025 Annual Report, Attachment, page 2. The actu...

AI summary The document discusses the financial implications of the ELIADC Tariff for Port Hawkesbury Paper (PHP) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). A positive ADC differential of $2.20/MWh results in PHP receiving $380,653, which is offset by $529,957 in incremental costs from PHP's off-schedule events, leading to a final bill of $149,304 for PHP.

Section 3 p. pp. 0-1
al cost, which equals $529,957. The net result, therefore, is PHP will be billed $149,304 to close out the 2025 ELIADC accounting,[10](#page-1-5) subject to any regulatory adjustments made later on. Operationally, NSPI reports large decrea...

AI summary The text discusses the financial impact of the ELIADC Tariff on PHP, noting a billing of $149,304 to close out the 2025 accounting. It also highlights operational changes due to a 2025 cyber incident, affecting tracking of Cause Codes 1, 2, and 4, while Cause Code 5 hours increased significantly. The ELIADC Tariff is noted to be performing as expected since its inception.

Section 4 p. p. 1
otia Power System Operator ("NSPSO")-induced increases in PHP's load. 12 Cause Code 2 hours are NSPSO-induced decreases in PHP's load. 13 Cause Code 4 hours are hours in which PHP and NSPI agree to a new dispatch. 14 2025 Annual Report, Ta...

AI summary The analysis discusses NSPI's ELIADC Tariff performance, noting that the $4.4 million in 2025 remains below the $10 million/year expected benefit. It highlights concerns regarding Cause Code 5 hours and NSPI's refunding of 75% of incremental costs. Additionally, the 2025 ELIADC Annual Report is referenced, along with ongoing FAM Audit efforts by Bates White.

102239Letter CA re: Not making submissions 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
Please refer to: David Roberts Email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Assistant: Alissa Whalen Assistant's email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) June 1, 2026 VIA WEB PORTAL Crystal Henwood...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate, David Roberts, informs the Nova Scotia Energy Board that Pink Larkin will not submit comments in M12768 regarding Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s ELIADC Tariff 2025 Annual Report. The letter is addressed to Clerk Crystal Henwood.

102240Submission - SBA 4 passages
Preamble p. p. 0
June 1, 2026 VIA EMAIL Ms. Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12768 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Contr...

AI summary This letter discusses the 2025 Annual Report for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s ELIADC Tariff, which includes the calculation of the ELIADC Energy Charge and the requirement for a minimum payment by PHP. The report was filed in response to the Board's approval of the 2024 AAR filing and an interim order allowing the 2024 ELIADC Tariff to remain in effect for an additional month.

In its 2025 Report, NS Power notes: p. p. 0
In its 2025 Report, NS Power notes: PHP will be billed the cost to serve above the amount that was collected on a monthly basis, in addition to the $4/MWh and other applicable fixed costs, to ensure compliance with the Tariff. NS Power wil...

AI summary NS Power will bill PHP for the cost to serve above monthly collections, including a $149,304 adjustment. The ELIADC Tariff aimed to encourage load shifting but only provided benefits in two of the six years from 2020 to 2025, with minimum payments prevailing otherwise.

Table 1 -Comparison of 2025 and Prior Year ELIADC Tariff Outcomes p. p. 0
Table 1 -Comparison of 2025 and Prior Year ELIADC Tariff Outcomes Year PHP Load (GWh) ADC Load Shifting Differential (SM) Benefit to Other Customers (SM) 2020 875 6.6 7.3 2021 966 (16.7) 3.9 2022 957 (48.9) 3.8 2023 670 (33.6) 2.7 2024 766...

AI summary Table 1 compares the ELIADC Tariff outcomes from 2020 to 2025, showing changes in PHP load, ADC load shifting differential, and benefits to other customers. The 2025 Report meets the Board's requirements and addresses recommendations from the Bates White FAM Audit Report.

Concerns p. p. 0
Concerns In its 2025 Report, NS Power states that it has met the three Bates White recommendations from the 2022-2023 FAM Audit. However, the SBA notes that NS Power acknowledged that it would not be able to address the requested hourly mo...

AI summary NS Power claims to have met the Bates White recommendations from the 2022-2023 FAM Audit, but the SBA notes that it did not provide the promised update on load shifting benefits in March 2026. NS Power plans to include more detailed quantification of load shifting benefits in the 2025 ELIADC Tariff Annual Report after consulting with Bates White.

102242Submission - IG 6 passages
Delivered by E-mail p. p. 0
Delivered by E-mail Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Energy Board 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12768 - NSPI - 2025 ELIADC Tariff Report These...

AI summary The Industrial Group submits observational comments on the ELIADC tariff, noting its expiration in 2026 and the need for NSPI/PHP to reapply for a new tariff or refreshed ELIADC if the ELID is not approved. Operational similarities between ELIADC and ELID may inform the Board's decision-making.

1. Actual Benefits to Other Customers Remain Below the Original Forecast p. p. 0
1. Actual Benefits to Other Customers Remain Below the Original Forecast It bears repeating that NSPI's 2019 ELIADC Tariff Application forecast annual benefits to other customers ranging from $6 to $13 million over the initial term, with a...

AI summary NSPI's 2019 ELIADC Tariff Application forecast annual benefits of $6–$13 million, but 2025 actual benefits were $4.4 million, 63% below the assumed load and 69% of the forecasted per-MWh benefit. Over six years, average annual benefits were $4.2 million, less than half the forecast. The IG argues this shortfall should be considered for the new ELID tariff in M12661.

4. PHP Load Revisions — Unlimited in Number and Frequency p. pp. 0-1
4. PHP Load Revisions — Unlimited in Number and Frequency PHP's initial 2025 forecast totalled 811 GWh. There were revisions to PHP's load forecast throughout the year, with a final actual demand requirement of 691 GWh. This represents a r...

AI summary PHP's 2025 load forecast was revised downward by 15% (120 GWh) from 811 GWh to 691 GWh. NSPI states the ELIADC Tariff allows unlimited forecast revisions, while the IG argues this creates a structural advantage for PHP, recommending tariff design improvements to address the gap.

5. Recommendation XV-1 — NSPI Accepted, Then Determined it Was Not Feasible p. pp. 1-2
5. Recommendation XV-1 — NSPI Accepted, Then Determined it Was Not Feasible Recommendation XV-1 from the 2022-2023 FAM Audit required NSPI to develop a benefits calculation that takes into account the hourly benefits and costs of PHP load...

AI summary NSPI accepted Recommendation XV-1 from the 2022-2023 FAM Audit but later determined it was not feasible. The IG criticizes NSPI for not disclosing technical concerns about implementing hourly benefits calculations under the ELIADC Tariff, despite claiming to seek feasible approaches. The IG requests a specific alternative methodology and highlights inconsistencies in NSPI's response.

6. Recommendation XV-3 — Detailed Load Shifting Quantification Again Deferred p. pp. 2-3
6. Recommendation XV-3 — Detailed Load Shifting Quantification Again Deferred In the 2022-2023 FAM Audit, NSPI accepted the recommendations of Bates White to improve the ELIADC annual reporting. In the ELIADC 2024 Annual Report decision, M...

AI summary The document discusses NSPI's repeated delays in providing detailed load shifting quantification as required by Recommendation XV-3, despite Board directives. The Board criticized NSPI for delaying tariff improvements, citing the 2025 Annual Report's omission of required details. NSPI attributed the 2025 delay to a cyber incident but provided no updates by March 2026. The IG urges the Board to impose a firm deadline for this analysis.

7. No Interest on the Balance Owed by PHP p. p. 3
7. No Interest on the Balance Owed by PHP As a result of off-schedule charges exceeding the ADC benefit earned by PHP, PHP has a net balance owing of $149,304 for the 2025 tariff year. In response to IG IR-4, NSPI confirmed that these amou...

AI summary PHP owes $149,304 for the 2025 tariff year due to off-schedule charges exceeding ADC benefits. NSPI confirms no interest is charged on this balance until the Annual ELIADC Report is accepted. The IG notes this creates a cost-free financing period for PHP and recommends the Board address carrying costs for post-year-end balances.

102306Reply Submission - NSPI 6 passages
Preamble p. p. 0
June 8, 2026 Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M12768 Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Report – NS Power Reply Submission...

AI summary NS Power submitted its reply to the ELIADC Tariff 2025 Report following responses from various stakeholders including Bates White, the Consumer Advocate, and the Small Business Advocate. The submission was made in accordance with the Board's established timeline.

Comparison of Tariff Performance to Original Forecast Benefits p. pp. 0-1
Comparison of Tariff Performance to Original Forecast Benefits BW, [1](#page-0-0) IG, [2](#page-0-1) and SBA[3](#page-0-2) submissions compare actual ELIADC Tariff performance to the approximately $10 million forecast average annual benefi...

AI summary The document compares the actual performance of the ELIADC Tariff to its original forecast benefits, noting that actual benefits have been significantly lower than the $10 million annual forecast. NS Power argues that the tariff's innovative design is a significant achievement despite the shortfall in benefits.

FAM Audit Recommendations and Reporting Enhancements p. p. 1
FAM Audit Recommendations and Reporting Enhancements The IG[6](#page-2-1) and SBA[7](#page-2-2) raise concerns regarding NS Power's implementation of recommendations, XV-1 and XV-3, arising from the 2022–2023 FAM Audit (M11533). In its sub...

AI summary The IG and SBA express concerns about NS Power's implementation of recommendations from the 2022–2023 FAM Audit. BW notes that it is currently conducting the 2024–2025 FAM Audit and will address NS Power's compliance with prior recommendations in its upcoming report.

Monthly Variability, Cost Recovery, and Reporting p. pp. 3-4
Monthly Variability, Cost Recovery, and Reporting In its submission, the IG describes month-to-month variability between billed revenues and cost to serve, and requests NS Power "provide in the monthly reporting M-8, a month-bymonth compar...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) requests detailed monthly reporting from NS Power to compare billed revenues with the cost to serve, highlighting shortfalls and explaining accruals. NS Power explains that the ELIADC Tariff operates on an annual settlement basis, and monthly values are provisional and subject to reconciliation. The IG also suggests including annual benefits and costs in future reports for better performance assessment.

Cause Codes and Cost Sharing Variability p. pp. 4-5
Cause Codes and Cost Sharing Variability In its submission, BW provided: The increase in Cause Code 5 hours from 2024 is concerning, if only because NSPI is only refunding 75% of the incremental costs of those deviations to its other custo...

AI summary The document discusses concerns around Cause Code 5 hours and cost-sharing under the ELIADC Tariff. It highlights that NSPI refunds only 75% of incremental costs from Cause Code 5 deviations to other customers, while PHP pays the full incremental cost. The Off-Schedule Charge is an incentive mechanism to encourage adherence to dispatch instructions and is fully recovered from PHP.

Conclusion p. pp. 6-7
Conclusion The 2025 ELIADC Annual Report demonstrates that the ELIADC Tariff continues to operate in accordance with its approved design, enabling the integration of PHP's flexible load into system dispatch and providing measurable benefit...

AI summary The 2025 ELIADC Annual Report shows that the ELIADC Tariff functions as intended, integrating PHP's flexible load and providing benefits to other customers. NS Power submits that the report fulfills its purpose and that issues related to tariff design are outside its scope.

102307Reply Submission - PHP 2 passages
Section 1 p. p. 0
James A. MacDuff Direct +1 (902) 444 8619 [email protected] Purdy's Wharf Tower II 1300-1969 Upper Water Street PO Box 730 Halifax NS Canada B3J 2V1 Tel +1 (902) 425 6500 Fax +1 (902) 425 6350 June 8, 2026 Ms. Crystal Henwood...

AI summary The document is a reply submission from Port Hawkesbury Paper LP in response to the 2025 ELIADC Tariff Report by NS Power. The submission supports the approval of the report, noting that there is no evidence of inaccuracies or non-compliance. It also addresses concerns raised about Cause Code 5 hours, stating that the increase is not a cause for concern.

Section 3 p. p. 0
uch information, PHP defers to NS Power (and ultimately the Board) as to what improvements can and should be made to future reporting to address stakeholder comments and the FAM Audit recommendations. Finally, PHP notes that once again, bo...

AI summary PHP highlights discrepancies in the calculated ELIADC benefit for other customers, noting it is significantly below the $10 million/year benefit expected by NS Power in 2019. PHP also points out that actual costs incurred were much higher than forecasted, impacting the overall cost contributions and tariff calculations.

103394Decision letter 2 passages
Submissions
Submissions In its submission, Bates White noted that Port Hawkesbury Paper's load in 2025 was 690,763 MWh, which was about 15% below the consumption forecast by Port Hawkesbury Paper. Bates White also noted the positive ADC differential i...

AI summary Bates White highlighted discrepancies in Port Hawkesbury Paper's load forecast and the financial implications of off-schedule events under the ELIADC tariff. It noted that NS Power only refunds 75% of incremental costs to other customers, raising concerns about the fairness of the arrangement. Bates White also mentioned ongoing FAM Audit efforts by NS Power.

Reply Submissions
Reply Submissions Port Hawkesbury Paper, in its reply submissions, requested that the 2025 ELIADC tariff report be approved as filed. Port Hawkesbury Paper noted there is no cause for concern regarding the Cause Code 5 hours since the 95 h...

AI summary Port Hawkesbury Paper requested approval of the 2025 ELIADC tariff report, noting that concerns about Cause Code 5 hours and forecast accuracy should be addressed in a new tariff proceeding. NS Power defended the ELIADC tariff's benefits and attributed forecast variances to market conditions, not design flaws. It also addressed concerns about interest on post-year-end balances and the need for detailed monthly reporting.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →