Topic:"Energy And Regulatory Boards Act" in M12249

5.4.1 Findings [65] The Board agrees that concerns about E1's demand response programs are better addressed in its consultations and upcoming application for approval of its fiveyear DSM Plan. That said, the Board notes that E1 should be f...

AI summary The Board agrees that E1's demand response program concerns should be addressed in its DSM Plan application, noting potential overlap with NS Power's Critical Peak Pricing Program and targeting constrained areas. The Board declines requiring E1's programs to have a PAC of at least 1.0, allowing lower PAC programs if justified under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

5.4.1 Findings [65] The Board agrees that concerns about E1's demand response programs are better addressed in its consultations and upcoming application for approval of its fiveyear DSM Plan. That said, the Board notes that E1 should be f...

AI summary The Board directs E1 to address concerns about its demand response programs in its upcoming DSM Plan application, including potential overlap with NS Power's Critical Peak Pricing Program. It rejects a PAC threshold of 1.0 for demand response programs, citing portfolio-level cost-effectiveness evaluations under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.