Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Energy And Regulatory Boards Act" in M12619

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - $284 million
6 passages 3 documents

Energy And Regulatory Boards Act across all matters →

N-22Responses to Undertakings 1-22 2 passages
Preamble p. p. 25
I EQS criteria. Absorbent pads and booms were deployed along the base of the retaining wall to provide temporary containment of potential surficial migration of mineral oil from the base of the wall. Based on the document site conditions a...

AI summary A Phase II ESA was conducted to assess soil and groundwater contamination from a transformer oil release. PHC contamination was found in soil and groundwater near the retaining wall, with potential ecological concerns identified. Groundwater contamination extent remains partially undetermined.

Analytical Results p. p. 165
Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: Groundwater (Matrix: Water) Client s ar mple ID MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 FD1 С lient sampling date / time 24-Oct-2024 09:30 24-Oct-2024 09:40 24-Oct-2024 10:10 24-Oct-2024 09:10 24-Oct-2024 00:00 Analyte CAS Number Me...

AI summary Analytical results from groundwater sampling at multiple monitoring wells (MW1 to MW4) and a field sample (FD1) show low levels of hydrocarbons and other contaminants. Most analytes are below detection limits, with some samples showing slight elevations in certain fractions of mTPH and EPH. The data suggest that hydrocarbon levels are generally within acceptable limits, and baseline conditions may have been re-established at some locations.

103410Decision 2 passages
A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted p. p. 67
A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to file, alongside each future ACE Plan, a ratepayer cost exposure reporting that includes: - NSPI's ACE capital program (a...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) urges the Board to require NSPI to provide detailed ratepayer cost exposure reporting in future ACE Plans, including capital program costs, reliability intertie costs, and IESO-NS-related expenses. NS Power argues that such analysis is not feasible due to uncertainties and complexities in estimating revenue requirements. The Board previously questioned the usefulness of this information and may reconsider based on recent developments and the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

6.3 Affordability as a consideration under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act p. pp. 68-69
6.3 Affordability as a consideration under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act [181] Affordability wording was introduced into the PUA by 2014 amendments about demand side management. The Board had to consider affordability when assessing...

AI summary The text discusses affordability considerations under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act, noting that affordability provisions related to demand side management plans were repealed. It also highlights the Board's responsibility to ensure capital projects provide safe, reliable, and economical energy, while still meeting environmental and performance standards.

103410Decision 2 passages
A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted p. p. 67
A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to file, alongside each future ACE Plan, a ratepayer cost exposure reporting that includes: - NSPI's ACE capital program (a...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) argues that the Board should require NSPI to provide detailed ratepayer cost exposure reports with each future ACE Plan, including capital programs, reliability intertie costs, and IESO-NS-related costs. NS Power opposes this, citing the complexity and uncertainty in estimating such impacts. The Board previously questioned the usefulness of including revenue requirement estimates in ACE Plans and may revisit the issue in light of new developments and the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

6.3 Affordability as a consideration under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act p. pp. 68-69
6.3 Affordability as a consideration under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act [181] Affordability wording was introduced into the PUA by 2014 amendments about demand side management. The Board had to consider affordability when assessing...

AI summary The Energy and Regulatory Boards Act requires the Board to consider affordability in the approval of demand side management plans. This requirement was recently repealed, but the Board's approach to affordability has not fundamentally changed. Section 6(2) of the Act emphasizes the need for safe, secure, reliable, and economical energy, reinforcing the use of least cost alternatives for capital projects while ensuring compliance with environmental and performance standards.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →