064632010 DSM Evaluation Reports 2/28/2011
268 passages
Small Business Lighting Solutions program, which fell short of its program target by 20%, or 2.8 GWh; and the New Houses program, which fell short of its program target by 66%, or 1.3 GWh. The C&I Custom program nearly achieved its program...
AI summary The 2010 DSM programs in Nova Scotia had mixed results, with some programs falling short of their targets while others showed promise. The Low Income Households program struggled with recruitment, while the BER program is expected to improve in 2011. Legislation mandating HP T8 lighting will affect the SLC program. The Small Business Lighting Solutions program saw increased energy impacts despite missing its target, and the New Houses program can enhance savings with stretch goals.
1.3.1 Data Quality Issues The NMR team encountered several issues involving inconsistent, inaccurate, or missing data in 2010. These issues were experienced particularly in the SBLS, DI, and C&I Custom programs. Inconsistent and Inaccurate...
AI summary The NMR team identified data quality issues in 2010, particularly in the SBLS, DI, and C&I Custom programs. These included data entry errors, discrepancies between recorded and observed installations, and potential vulnerabilities in programs using subcontractors. Corrective actions were taken, but additional audits are recommended for similar programs.
Program Finding Recommendation Efficient DI-F4. DI-R4. Lighting In 2010, respondents cited lack of time as the number one barrier to At the time of participant contact, provide additional information or Products pursuing additional energy...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures, including lack of time and limited financing. It recommends providing additional information to participants and adjusting incentive levels for CFLs. It also suggests exploring financing options in collaboration with local banks.
Program Finding Recommendation Business BER-F4. BER-R4. Energy The BER program was designed to be a streamlined prescriptive The BER should continue to work with customers to avoid creating Rebate program. Not surprisingly, nearly all the...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program was found to be well-received by most participants, with minimal barriers to participation. One respondent reported a delay in eligibility determination. As the program scales, maintaining customer service standards and responsiveness is recommended.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 DSM Programs Executive Summary Page 31 Program Finding Recommendation New NH-F16. NH-R16. Houses Some builders and homeowners were participating in the program Consider revising the program objectives and components...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program identified that some participants received rebates for pre-planned energy efficiency measures, and that transferring rebates to builders helped reduce upfront costs. However, administrative costs were high, and builders lacked sufficient incentives to ensure program effectiveness.
Program Finding Recommendation EnerGuide EEH-F1. EEH-R1. Existing When approaching program design the DSM Administrator should In the near term, the DSM Administrator should consider the Houses keep in mind that the Delivery Agents have ha...
AI summary The EnerGuide Existing Houses Program faces challenges due to staff layoffs by Delivery Agents, necessitating a ramp-up period for re-hiring and training. Delivery Agents also emphasize the need for federal funding, which has been withdrawn by NRCan, and suggest a market potential study if federal funds are unavailable.
point system, not through prescriptive savings estimates. EEH-F15. EEH-R15. There are different savings estimates for every prescriptive measure The new program should consider coordinating with any new that is sponsored by the existing an...
AI summary The text discusses variations in prescriptive savings estimates between existing and new houses programs, highlighting discrepancies such as those for water heater tank insulation and programmable thermostats. It also emphasizes the need for clarity in how savings estimates are developed and the assumptions used in the tracking database for program evaluation.
Program Finding Recommendation Low LIH-F4. LIH-R4. Income Customers were motivated to participate in the program primarily Continue to promote the savings benefits of the program with an Households because of energy savings and the associa...
AI summary The Low Income Households Program was effective in motivating participation through energy savings and financial benefits, with 48% of participants citing energy cost savings as a primary motivator. The program led to a 40% reduction in energy bills for some participants, and improved comfort levels were reported by 61% of respondents. The recommendation emphasizes promoting the program's benefits and clarifying its cost-free nature.
L-F5. PD:CFL-R5. Anticipating having to drop regular CFLs from its lineup of rebated The program should evaluate the opportunities for rebating LEDs energy efficiency products, the PD program has sought other energy (other than Christmas l...
AI summary The PD program is considering replacing rebated CFLs with LED products due to the declining CFL market. NMR recommends conducting a socket saturation study to assess the market stage for energy-efficient lighting.
................................................... 43 5.5.1 Applying the Rebates ............................................................................................................................. 43 5.5.2 Rebate Processing and...
AI summary The text outlines various sections related to rebate application, processing, and verification, as well as program awareness and CFL purchase motivations and behaviors. It includes subsections on on-site visits, Energy Star awareness, and barriers to CFL purchases.
NMR TABLE 5-1: SAMPLE SIZE AND SAMPLING ERROR ..................................................................................... 42 TABLE 5-2: LEVEL OF FAMILIARITY WITH ENERGY STAR™[][] .....................................................
AI summary The text lists various tables related to energy efficiency programs, including customer awareness, purchasing behavior, and barriers to adopting CFLs (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) and energy-efficient products. The data spans different years and focuses on program participation and knowledge of energy labels.
........................................................................... 77 TABLE 6-10: OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH PROGRAM ........................................................................ 77 TABLE 6-11: REASON FOR DISSATISFACTION...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to customer satisfaction, program participation barriers, and the impact of rebate programs. It includes data on satisfaction levels, reasons for dissatisfaction, employment statistics, and sales trends associated with energy efficiency initiatives.
d savings estimates can be found in Table 1. All savings presented are at the generator level (based on line losses of 11.88%) and the CFL savings include the impact of interactive effects of heating. Table 1: 2010 Program Energy Savings E...
AI summary The document presents energy savings estimates from various programs in 2010, including CFLs, ENERGY STAR products, and thermostats. It distinguishes between gross and net savings at the generator level, factoring in line losses and interactive effects of heating.
Findings and Recommendations for CFLs Findings Recommendations PD:CFL-F4. PD:CFL-R4. As the 2012 date for phase-out of incandescent bulbs gets closer, The PD program should consider offering an incandescent bounty there is likely to be som...
AI summary As the phase-out of incandescent bulbs approaches, the PD program anticipates consumer hoarding and plans to offer rebates for LED bulbs. It also recommends a socket saturation study to better understand lighting usage and diffusion of energy-efficient products in Nova Scotia.
adequate supply of the rebated products, notifying the retailers early allows them to promote the program in the local media. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 1 1 Program Description This section presents the program descript...
AI summary The document outlines the Power Down program (PD) and its three components: CFLs, light fixtures and controls, and appliances. It emphasizes the importance of notifying retailers early to ensure an adequate supply of rebated products and promote the program locally.
wer Down program, we have divided the program description, program theory, and logic model into three distinct program components: CFLs; Light fixtures and controls Appliances 1.1 CFL: Program Description The 2010 Power Down program...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down program offered discounts on ENERGY STAR®-qualified CFLs, light fixtures, and appliances. Administered by the implementation contractor, it was promoted through various channels, including in-store signage, radio spots, and online resources, but did not include in-store events or an educational component.
ocessing required since retailers can provide one invoice for all POS rebates. The PD program provides coupons for stores where discounts cannot be automatically rung up at the cash register. Customer education and outreach. The PD progr...
AI summary The Power Down (PD) program uses coupons and marketing to promote energy-efficient lighting, particularly CFLs. It collaborates with retailers and uses various outreach methods to raise awareness and encourage purchases. The program assumes that marketing efforts will lead to increased sales and installations of energy-efficient products.
1-1: Power Down CFLs Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 1 1.2 F&C: Program Description The Light Fixtures and Controls (F&C) portions of the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program began on October 1st 2010 and ran...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down (PD) program's Light Fixtures and Controls (F&C) portion aimed to achieve annual energy savings through the promotion of energy-efficient products. The program exceeded its projections, with significant rebate sales for various energy-efficient items.
1.3 APP: Program Description The Appliance Rebate portion (APP) of the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program began on October 1st 2010 and ran through the end of December 2010. The program was administered by the implementation contract...
AI summary The Appliance Rebate Program (APP) of the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program aimed to achieve energy savings through rebates for ENERGY STAR appliances. Initially targeting chain retailers, it was expanded to include independent retailers after protests. The program exceeded its targets, with over 2,000 refrigerators and washers sold, partly due to the extension into December.
ve strategy and projections for uptake are based on retailers having sufficient ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers available for the Nova Scotia market. Program Barriers Awareness. While it is not necessary that customers are...
AI summary The document discusses the challenges and strategies for the Power Down Program, including the need for retailers to stock ENERGY STAR appliances, awareness as a potential driver for participation, customer purchase readiness, and the role of retailers in program success. It also mentions short-term outcomes such as discounted appliances and retailer outreach.
ote that, since the discount was available only for ENERGY STAR-qualified CFLs, NMR adapted the questionnaire to determine the number of ENERGY STAR-qualified CFLs purchased and other CFL purchases. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Progra...
AI summary The NMR adapted its questionnaire to track ENERGY STAR-qualified CFL purchases for the Power Down Program. Using data from retailers, NMR validated New England's displaced wattage parameter for energy and demand savings calculations, finding it nearly identical to the calculated average of 47.87.
ed an average displaced wattage of 47.87—practically identical to the New England displaced wattage parameter of 45.7 Watts. Appendix A includes the displaced wattage validation calculations and data. Table 2-1: Energy and Demand Savings E...
AI summary The document discusses energy and demand savings estimation parameters for CFLs, including displaced wattage, net-to-gross ratio, and annual hours of use, referencing studies from New England and program records. It includes data on program sales and installation rates.
st-Year Estimated Energy and Demand Savings The first-year estimated energy and demand savings at the meter are calculated using the following formulas: First year energy savings calculations CFLs: 10 In the New England Markdown study, the...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation methodology for estimating first-year energy and demand savings from the 2010 Power Down Program, specifically focusing on CFLs. It includes formulas, line loss factors, and tables with energy and demand savings data at both the meter and generator levels.
tor (kW) 2,058 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 12 2.1.2 Lifetime Energy and Demand Savings Lifetime energy and demand savings are presented for three possible scenarios based on future availability of incandescent lamps in N...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program's lifetime energy and demand savings under three scenarios, considering the potential phase-out of incandescent lamps by 2012. Scenario one assumes no new standards, allowing the program to claim full lifetime savings from CFLs installed.
2,058 Lifetime net energy savings at the generator – scenario three (MWh) 16,378 Lifetime net demand savings at the generator – scenario three (kW) 2,110 2.1.3 Interactive Effects For the 2010 evaluation, the NMR team sought to estimate th...
AI summary The NMR team evaluated the interactive effects of the CFL portion of the PD program in 2010. Interactive effects refer to changes in electrical use of other devices influenced by energy conservation measures. The evaluation used simplified engineering methods to estimate HVAC interaction impacts, assuming zero positive electric cooling interactive effects for conservatism.
an effort to be as conservative as possible, the positive electric cooling interactive effects were assumed to be zero. To calculate the heating interaction impacts the following formulas were used: NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Progra...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program by calculating energy and demand savings with and without interaction effects between lighting and heating systems, using specific coefficients and assumptions, including a 30% rate of electrically-heated homes in Nova Scotia.
Scenario Two at the generator 2,058 9,561 1,976 9,130 Scenario Three at the generator 2,110 16,378 2,026 15,641 13 To be as conservative as possible the NMR team assumed a COP equivalent to that of an electric resistance heating system. 14...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program's fixtures and controls component, reviewing savings assumptions based on the Ontario Power Authority report and secondary research from CALMAC and CEE databases. The NMR team used these to assess the validity of the program's savings estimates.
er Authority (OPA) report titled ―2010 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions‖.17 This is reasonable as the OPA report offers savings estimates for each of the products rebated through the PD program. 3.1 ENERGY STAR Qualified Indoor Light...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility Board (NMR) evaluated the savings assumptions for ENERGY STAR qualified indoor light fixtures in the Power Down program by reviewing multiple studies, including a 2010 report from the Ontario Power Authority and other relevant research.
that the average displaced wattage from the rebated fixtures was 50 Watts. Using the equation below, the NMR team developed annual gross per unit savings estimates for interior fixtures of 34 kWh. NMR applied the annual savings value ident...
AI summary The NMR report estimates that the Power Down Program resulted in 274,074 kWh of annual savings from rebated interior light fixtures, which is 73% lower than the program's tracking database. Differences are attributed to variations in bulb replacement assumptions, daily usage estimates, and in-service rate adjustments.
Page 19 Using the equations below we determined that the indoor light fixtures rebated through the program resulted in demand savings of 70.1 kW. (Table 3-1) Table 3-1: Tracked and Evaluated Savings—ENERGY STAR Qualified Indoor Light Fixtu...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from the rebate program for ENERGY STAR qualified indoor light fixtures, noting demand savings of 70.1 kW. It references the OPA report for savings estimates and highlights the lack of secondary sources for controls measures.
kWh, likely because these studies did not focus on programmable thermostats for electric baseboard heating.19 Electric baseboard heating is not nearly as common in the United States as it is in Canada, for this reason the results from the...
AI summary The document discusses the energy savings associated with programmable thermostats used with electric baseboard heating. It highlights that savings are lower compared to central heating systems and references the OPA report and PD program data to support the current assumption of 63.15 kWh savings per electric baseboard.
d 7,383 programmable thermostats between October and November of 2010, resulting in savings of 466,236 kWh—we believe these savings estimates are accurate and do not recommend any changes. (Table 3-2) Table 3-2: Tracked and Evaluated Savin...
AI summary The document evaluates the savings from 7,383 programmable thermostats installed between October and November 2010, reporting total savings of 466,236 kWh. It also discusses the savings assumptions for indoor light timers, citing the OPA report and confirming the current estimate is reasonable.
ggests that the tracked savings estimates remain the same. Between October and November of 2010, the PD program rebated 2,139 heavy duty timers resulting in program savings of 820,627 kWh. (Table 3-4) Table 3-4: Tracked and Evaluated Savin...
AI summary The Power Down (PD) program rebated 2,139 heavy duty timers and 3,781 dimmer switches, resulting in program savings of 820,627 kWh and 89,421 kWh, respectively. Savings estimates are based on assumptions about usage behavior and technology efficiency.
assume that the current program savings assumption of 23.65 kWh per unit is reasonable. The PD program rebated a total of 3,781 dimmer switches, resulting in program savings of 89,421 kWh. (Table 3-5) Table 3-5: Tracked and Evaluated Savin...
AI summary The PD program has rebated dimmer switches and power bars with integrated timers, achieving tracked energy savings. The savings assumptions for these programs are based on the OPA report, with specific values of 23.65 kWh per dimmer switch and 53.39 kWh per power bar. These assumptions are considered reasonable based on available data.
221 12 13 12 13 0% timers Total 22,109 2,513 2,811 1,777 1,988 -29% We calculated the demand savings for controls by obtaining the ratio of all residential target peak demand savings to target energy savings for the Efficient Products—Reta...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of demand savings for various energy efficiency measures under the Efficient Products—Retail Program. It uses the energy-to-demand ratio of 4.8 to determine demand savings for each category at the generator level, with total demand savings amounting to 420.4 kW and energy savings of 1,988 MWh.
October-November 2010 than in October-November 2009 do you attribute to the Power Down program promotion and rebates? You just indicated that the percentage sales of [MEASURE CATEGORY] that qualified for the Power Down rebate was higher af...
AI summary The text consists of a series of questions directed at retailers regarding the impact of the Power Down program on the sales of specific energy efficiency measures. It explores the extent to which the program's rebates influenced sales, the duration of any follow-on effects, and the importance of rebates in customer purchasing decisions.
and demand savings for the F&C components of the PD program in 2010. For the 2010 program year, the generator-level impacts are estimated at 1,071 MWh of energy savings and 225.7 kW of demand savings. Table 3-16: Fixture and Controls Energ...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program achieved estimated energy savings of 1,071 MWh and demand savings of 225.7 kW. The table provides a breakdown of savings by component, including indoor light fixtures, programmable thermostats, and timers. The net-to-gross ratio varies across components, with some achieving 100% efficiency.
225.7 1,071 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 33 4 Impact Evaluation: Appliance Rebates The Power Down program (PD) Appliance Rebate (APP) component ran from October 1st, 2010 through the end of December 2010. The program prov...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program's Appliance Rebate component assessed savings assumptions using databases like CALMAC and CEE. Savings estimates were based on the Ontario Power Authority's 2010 report, which provided product-specific savings estimates for rebated appliances.
2,025 2,025 Savings per unit (kWh) 181.27 242 Total savings (kWh) 367,072 490,050 4.2 Gross Impacts—Appliances Table 4-3 displays a comparison of the tracked and evaluated savings for ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers. NMR esti...
AI summary The document evaluates the savings from the 2010 Power Down Program, specifically for ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers. Nova Scotia Power (NMR) estimated savings at the meter and generator levels, showing a 20% increase compared to tracked estimates, with a line loss factor applied for generator-level calculations.
oduct was approved for a rebate. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 44
AI summary The document discusses the approval of a product for a rebate under the 2010 Power Down Program by NMR. This indicates a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and customer incentives.
26 8 10 9σ 1Ω σ 2 16 or more 26 3 6 19 6Ω 7 Out of the 483 CFLs purchased by participants during the program period, 327 (67%) were qualifying CFL bulbs and were, therefore, counted as having been purchased through the program. Over the co...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, noting that 67% of the 483 CFLs purchased by participants were qualifying bulbs. Participants in 2010 averaged significantly fewer qualifying CFL purchases (4.7) compared to 2008 (10.8) and 2009 (6.5). Qualifying bulbs were those purchased from participating retailers, including multipacks or specialty CFLs.
0 na NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 57 In all three program years, 2008 through 2010, the majority of participants reporting at least one CFL had not been installed indicated ―bought as spares‖ as the primary reason for not...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program evaluation found that most participants who had not installed CFLs kept them in storage, with fewer reporting they were bought as spares compared to previous years.
0 0 5σ∑ 3 0 'Extremely 5 8 7 3 12σ 8 unlikely' NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 61 Respondents who were unlikely to purchase CFLs in the next year (rated likelihood of five or less) were asked what would encourage them to pur...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program evaluation found that respondents unlikely to purchase CFLs in the next year cited more rebates or promotions as the most frequent motivation to encourage CFL purchases.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 72 6 Process Evaluation: Fixtures and Controls 6.1 Program Description The Light Fixtures and Controls (F&C) portion of the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program began on October 1st 2010 a...
AI summary The 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down Program's Light Fixtures and Controls portion exceeded energy savings projections, with significant rebate distributions for various energy-efficient products. A process evaluation involved a telephone survey of 47 chain store managers to assess program effectiveness.
ovember 2010. The lowest average increase was a 10% increase for outdoor timers from 60% to 66%; the highest average increase was a 78% increase for power bars with timers from 36% to 64%. (Table 6-5) Table 6-5: Average Percent of Rebated...
AI summary The text presents data on the average percent of rebated product sales for various products under the 2010 Power Down Program, showing increases in sales percentages from January–September 2010 to October–November 2010, with the lowest and highest increases noted for outdoor timers and power bars with timers, respectively.
nd November. Although the program was expanded to include independent retailers and extended to December, the program targets remained the same. In the in-depth interview, the program manager at the NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Progra...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program was expanded to include independent retailers and extended until December, but its targets remained unchanged. The program's budget was adjusted to accommodate these changes. The evaluation highlights that even without the expansion, the program was likely to exceed its targets based on sales data from one retailer. The document also discusses rebate processing and retailer participation, with most store managers being familiar with stocking patterns and sales trends of rebated items.
that were rebated through the program in 2010. Some respondents had not worked at the store or in the department in 2009 and would not venture an estimate, which accounts for the smaller sample sizes. Table 7-3: Average Percent Rebated Pro...
AI summary The text discusses the Power Down Program in 2010, focusing on the average percent of rebated product sales for ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers across chain and independent retailers. Data is presented for different time periods, including January–September/October 2010, October–December 2010, January 2011, and October–December 2009.
60% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 85 Retailers who reported an increase in sales of qualifying models during the program period as compared with the time period before the program were asked the percentage of that increase...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program shows that retailers attributed a significant portion of increased sales of ENERGY STAR appliances to the program. Chain retailers attributed 86% of the increase to the program, while independent retailers attributed 67%.
100% 1 100% 2 100% 2010 Increase from Oct/Nov-Dec 2 50% 2 50% 2009 The respondents were asked if, in the absence of the rebates from the Power Down program, the sales of the rebated equipment would have been lower, the same, or higher. If...
AI summary The analysis examines the impact of the Power Down program on the sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers. Most chain retailers believe the program significantly increased sales, while independent retailers are more divided, with some believing sales would have been the same.
les would have been lower for refrigerators, estimated that sales would have been 50% lower, while for clothes washers independent retailers estimated that sales would have been 23% lower. (Table 7-5) Table 7-5: Predicted Sales in the Abse...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Power Down Program on refrigerator and clothes washer sales, estimating that sales would have been significantly lower without the program. Table 7-5 provides data on predicted sales by retailer type.
23% 23% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 86 The majority of chain retailers indicated that, concurrently with the program rebates, other rebates or promotions had also been offered on ENERGY STAR refrigerators (6 out of 8) an...
AI summary The text discusses the 2010 Power Down Program, highlighting that most chain retailers offered additional rebates or promotions alongside the program's rebates for ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers. The value of these additional rebates varied significantly among retailers.
e the other valued them at between $100 and $299. For clothes washers, one independent retailer valued the rebates at between $3 and $15 while the other valued them at between $50 and $99. (Table 7-6) Table 7-6: Whether Other Rebates were...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, highlighting discrepancies in rebate valuations for ENERGY STAR appliances between chain retailers and independent retailers. For refrigerators, chain retailers valued rebates between $100 and $299, while independent retailers valued them between $3 and $15. Similar discrepancies were noted for clothes washers.
0 1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 87 When asked to rate the importance of the program rebate to the customer purchase decision, the majority of chain retailers rated rebate as either important or extremely important for bo...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program indicates that chain retailers found rebates important for ENERGY STAR appliance purchases, while independent retailers had mixed views, with some considering rebates unimportant for refrigerators and others finding them important for clothes washers.
ocking practices, while two of the seven had made changes to the placement or location of the rebated appliances, and two of the seven had changed advertising or promotions for the rebated appliances. Table 7-15: Whether Changes Were Made...
AI summary The text discusses changes made by retailers in response to program participation, including adjustments to stocking practices, placement of rebated appliances, and advertising. It also highlights how independent retailers marketed the Power Down rebate to customers, with varying approaches in presenting rebate information.
le size 2 Decided not to 1 Too much work 1 The independent retailers were asked about their procedures for tracking the rebates. One-half of the independent retailers (3 out of 6) reported that they had tracked the rebates by hand; the rem...
AI summary The document discusses how independent retailers track rebates, with half using manual methods and the other half using computer systems or internal SKU numbers. It also mentions that most respondents were satisfied with the Power Down program.
9 6 15 Program Rebates Very satisfied 5 1 6 Satisfied 4 5 9 Table 7-23: Reasons for Dissatisfaction Independent Program Marketing and Advertising Chain Retailers Retailers Total Sample size 2 2 Inadequate materials/preparation 2 2 NMR Eval...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program indicates that independent retailers were generally satisfied with aspects such as interaction with the implementation contractor, rebate processing, and rebate tracking and reporting. However, satisfaction with interactions with DSM Administrator staff was lower due to a small sample size and limited interaction.
ed to the fact that most retailers indicated having had no interaction with DSM Administrator staff. (Table 7-24) Table 7-24: Satisfaction with Specific Aspects of Program – Independent Retailers Independent Retailers Sample size 5 Interac...
AI summary The text discusses the satisfaction levels of independent retailers with aspects of the Power Down program, including interaction with the DSM Administrator, NSP staff, rebate processing, and tracking and reporting of rebates. The sample sizes and satisfaction ratings are provided in Table 7-24.
Environmentally friendly 2 NSP added credibility 1 Table 7-26 shows respondents‘ recommendations for improving the Power Down program. Almost one- half of the chain retailers (3 out of 7) suggested expanding the program to include more ite...
AI summary Respondents recommended expanding the Power Down program to include more ENERGY STAR items and increasing rebate values. Some suggested offering higher rebates for purchasing multiple appliances together, while others proposed including independent retailers and adjusting the program timing.
r. One chain retailer remarked that since the program had been run around Christmas time, people had been focused on spending their money on gift items as opposed to refrigerators and clothes washers. Table 7-26: Recommendations for Power...
AI summary A chain retailer noted that the Power Down Program, run around Christmas, may have been less effective as consumers focused on gift spending rather than purchasing refrigerators and clothes washers. Table 7-26 outlines recommendations for the program, including higher rebates, including more ENERGY STAR items, and running the program at a different time of year.
35 years 19 years NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page A1 Appendix A – Displaced Wattage Validation Calculations For the 2010 program year, several retailers provided specific sales information including, in some cases, mode...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program by analyzing displaced wattage from CFL sales. NMR used ENERGY STAR equivalency tables to estimate displaced wattage for 66% of CFLs sold, calculating a weighted average of 47.87 displaced watts. The calculation assumes participants follow ENERGY STAR guidelines and does not account for missing or out-of-range wattage data.
[CHECK: PB2B2a >= PB2B1a] Purchases by pack size January-December 2010: PB2b2a1. Number of single CFL bulb packs PB2b2a2. Number of two-pack CFLs PB2b2a3. Number of three-pack CFLs PB2b2a4. Number of four-pack CFLs PB2b2a5. Number of five-...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs under the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down Program. It asks respondents to report the number of bulbs purchased in various pack sizes and the number of ENERGY STAR-qualified CFLs purchased in 2010.
3 L. Any other stores I did not mention? a. SPECIFY1 b. SPECIFY2 c. SPECIFY3 d. SPECIFY4 [IF PB4L = 2 or 3 SKIP PB5][REPEAT FOR EACH OTHER SPECIFIED IN PB4L] NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B10 PB5. What type of store i...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to store types and energy-efficient bulb purchases, referencing the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program. It asks respondents about their purchasing behavior, including reasons for higher ENERGY STAR™-qualified CFL bulb purchases during specific months.
2. Not familiar 3. Neither familiar nor unfamiliar 4. Somewhat familiar -[SKIP TO Q1] 5. Very familiar - [SKIP TO Q1] 9. Don‘t know / Refused I4. Is there someone else at this store who would be familiar with the stocking patterns or sales...
AI summary The text contains survey questions and response options related to product sales and rebate participation in the Nova Scotia Power Power Down program, which ran from October to November 2010. It also includes a list of products that were eligible for rebates under the program.
ASK THEM FOR THEIR BEST GUESS. IF THEY CANNOT PROVIDE A SINGLE BEST GUESS, ASK THEM FOR AN APPROXIMATE RANGE. TRY, AS FAR AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE, TO AVOID A DON‘T KNOW RESPONSE] A. B. C. D. LIGHT FIXTURES Jan-Sept. 2010 Oct-Nov Dec 2010 Oc...
AI summary The text provides a table structure for light fixture rebate percentages across different time periods, indicating a focus on appliance rebate programs and their performance over time.
Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q4. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED FIXTURES ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]: You...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of sales of rebated fixtures during different time periods and the impact of the program on those sales. It includes questions about the attribution of increased sales to the program's promotion and rebates.
wer Down program period in December 2010 NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B28 than they were before Power Down program period, between January and September 2010. What percentage of that increase in sales do you attribut...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on its impact on sales of ENERGY STAR light fixtures. It includes questions about the program's influence on sales, the expected duration of its follow-on effects, and the estimated impact of the $15 rebate on store sales.
rogram discounts, you would have only sold [100 - (% FROM Q5B 100)] ENERGY STAR light fixtures that week without the program discounts? IF RESPONSE IS ≠ YES THEN CLARIFY RESPONSE TO Q5B Q6A. During the October-November promotion period, be...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the impact of the Power Down program on the sale of ENERGY STAR light fixtures, including inquiries about other rebates and the importance of the program to customer purchasing decisions.
Oct-Nov Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q9. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998=Refused; 999=Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED DIMMER SWITCHES ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of dimmer switch sales attributed to the rebate program during specific time periods, such as October-November 2010 compared to earlier periods.
dicated that the percentage sales of dimmer NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B31 switches that qualified for the Power Down rebate was higher after the Power Down program period in December 2010 than they were before Pow...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, specifically focusing on the impact of rebates on dimmer switch sales. It asks respondents to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects are expected to last.
portant and 5 is extremely important. NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B33 IF Q2B1=3 POWER BARS WITH TIMERS Q13. I now have a few questions about your sales of power bars with timers. A. Roughly what percent of ALL the p...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions about the sales and rebate participation of power bars with timers during and around the Power Down program promotion in 2010, asking for percentages of rebated items sold in different time periods.
after the Power Down program period in NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B34 December 2010 than they were before Power Down program period, between January and September 2010. What percentage of that increase in sales do...
AI summary The text includes survey questions aimed at evaluating the impact of the Power Down program on sales of power bars with timers. It asks retailers to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects may last.
am discounts, you would have only sold [100 - (% FROM Q15B 100)] power bars with timers that week without the program discounts? IF RESPONSE IS ≠ YES THEN CLARIFY RESPONSE TO Q15B Q16A. During the October-November promotion period, besides...
AI summary The text contains a series of survey questions related to the impact of the Power Down program on customer purchasing behavior, including rebate discounts, other promotions, and the importance of the rebate in decision-making.
portant and 5 is extremely important. NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B36 IF Q2B1=4 INDOOR LIGHT TIMERS Q18. I now have a few questions about your sales of indoor light timers. A. Roughly what percent of ALL the indoor...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding the sales and rebate rates of indoor light timers before, during, and after the Power Down program promotion in 2010. The questions aim to evaluate the program's impact on sales and rebate participation.
Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q19. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED INDOOR LIGHT TIMERS ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (C...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of sales of rebated indoor light timers during different time periods, specifically comparing October-November 2010 with earlier periods to assess the impact of the rebate program.
n program rebate had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; [998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] C. I want to make sure I understand you correctly when you say your store‘s sales of indoor light timers would be [% FROM...
AI summary The text discusses customer responses to the Power Down program rebate for indoor light timers, including the impact of the rebate on sales and customer purchasing decisions. It includes questions about the rebate's importance and whether other rebates were offered during the same period.
ASK THEM FOR THEIR BEST GUESS. IF THEY CANNOT PROVIDE A SINGLE BEST GUESS, ASK THEM FOR AN APPROXIMATE RANGE. TRY, AS FAR AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE, TO AVOID A DON‘T KNOW RESPONSE] A. B. C. D. HEAVY DUTY POOL OR Jan-Sept. 2010 Oct-Nov Dec 201...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of sales of rebated pool and outdoor timers during different time periods, and asks respondents to estimate the impact of the program on these sales.
am promotion and rebates? % NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B40 C. [IF % SALES OF REBATED POOL OR OUTDOOR TIMERS ARE HIGHER IN DEC. 2010 (COL. C) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]: You just indicated that the percentage s...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the impact of rebates on sales of pool and outdoor timers. It asks retailers to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effect might last.
6. Provincial Government $ 7. City/Town/Municipality $ 8. Other $ 98. Refused 99. Don‘t know Q27. During the October-November program promotion period, how important would you say the rebate from the Power Down Program was to customers‘ de...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the importance of rebates from the Power Down Program to customer decisions and asks retailers about the percentage of electronic baseboard thermostats sold before, during, and after the program promotion period that were rebated.
Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 THERMOSTATS 2010 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q29. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED ELECTRONIC BASEBOARD THERMOSTATS ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the impact of rebates on the sales of electronic baseboard thermostats during different time periods, specifically comparing October-November 2010 with January-September 2010 and October-November 2009.
er during the October-November promotion period if the $5 Power Down program rebate had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; [998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] C. I want to make sure I understand you correctly when...
AI summary This section of the document evaluates the impact of the Power Down program rebate on the sales of electronic baseboard thermostats during the October-November promotion period, asking respondents to estimate sales without the rebate and whether other rebates were offered.
during the October-November promotion period if the $XXX Power Down program rebate had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; [998=Refused; 999=Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] C. I want to make sure I understand you correctly when y...
AI summary This text discusses customer responses to the Power Down program rebate, including the impact of the rebate on sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators and the importance customers placed on the rebate during the October-November promotion period. It also asks about other rebates offered on refrigerators during the same period.
E TIME TO RESPOND TO THIS SURVEY.] NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B54 INDEPENDENT RETAIL STORE MANAGER QUESTIONNAIRE NSPI RETAIL MARKDOWN PROGRAM: APPLIANCE REBATES Final: January 6, 2011 Hello may I please speak with...
AI summary This document is a questionnaire from the NMR Group evaluating the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, specifically focusing on appliance rebates. It aims to gather information from retail store managers about their participation and knowledge of the program's impact on appliance stocking and sales trends.
9. Don‘t know / Refused NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B55 I4. Is there someone else at this store who would be familiar with the stocking patterns or sales trends for the appliances that you sell? BACKGROUND 1. What i...
AI summary The document is a questionnaire aimed at evaluating the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program. It asks retailers about their participation, product sales, and awareness of the program. The focus is on understanding appliance sales trends and rebate application during the program period.
promotion period, besides the Power Down program rebates, were there any other rebates provided on refrigerators? 3. Yes 4. No 8. Refused 9. Don‘t know Q36B. [IF Q36A=YES]: Who offered the rebates and what was the value of the rebates? 9....
AI summary The text includes survey questions about rebate programs for refrigerators during the Power Down Program promotion period, specifically asking about the importance of rebates in influencing customer purchases of ENERGY STAR refrigerators. The questions are part of an evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program.
romotion and rebates? % G. NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B60 Q40. D. During the November-December promotion, the Power Down program provided a rebate of $50 for each ENERGY STAR clothes washer sold in your store. If t...
AI summary The document presents a survey question regarding the impact of the Power Down program's $50 rebate on ENERGY STAR clothes washer sales during the November-December promotion period. It asks respondents to estimate the percentage decrease in sales if the rebate had not been available.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM ENERGY AND DEMAND SAVINGS ..................................................................... I TABLE 3-1: CALIFORNIA ARP LAB-TO-ON-SITE DIFFERENCES FOR “COOL” CLIMATE ZONES .....................................
AI summary The text lists various tables related to energy and demand savings, appliance consumption estimates, and energy efficiency program evaluations. These tables provide detailed data on appliance retirement programs, energy consumption, and savings calculations.
Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs Page 10 3 Impact Evaluation 3.1 Methodology for Refrigerators and Freezers This section describes the methodology and calculations used by NMR to calcul...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used by NMR to calculate energy savings from the Appliance Retirement and Replacement program for refrigerators and freezers, including the use of AHAM data, adjustments for device degradation and field performance, and the calculation of adjusted gross savings.
primary refrigerators that were plugged in year round. We used the program‘s tracking database to determine the energy consumption of replacement refrigerators for the replacement program component. 3 AHAM (2010). Trends in Energy Efficien...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs involved calculating energy savings by accounting for partial use and replacement equipment. Net savings were determined by applying a free-ridership rate to adjusted gross savings estimates, and the results were used to calculate total program savings attributable to the DSM Administrator.
341 1,405 706 706 Annual energy 1,437 1,001 1,106 1,005 consumption (kWh/year) Based on the consumption estimates and number of units listed in Table 3-2, the tracking database reported program savings of 4,841 MWh at the meter and 5,416 M...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings from an appliance retirement program, including meter and generator-level savings. It also outlines participant categories for refrigerators and freezers, with a focus on secondary appliances. NMR Group evaluated program impacts based on participant surveys and secondary research.
t refrigerators was 369 kWh and 577 kWh respectively. The final value for new replacement freezers was 347 kWh per year, while the final for used replacement freezers was 390 kWh per year. (Table 3-8) Table 3-8: Energy Consumption of Repla...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy consumption of replacement appliances, comparing new and used refrigerators and freezers. It highlights energy savings estimates adjusted for partial use and replacement equipment, noting that most replacements were new appliances.
ts for the secondary replaced refrigerator UEC is shown below: Similar calculations were applied to the other UECs. Table 3-10 shows the adjusted gross savings using each of the NMR methodologies. Table 3-10: Adjusted Gross Savings per Uni...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs by calculating adjusted gross savings for refrigerators and freezers using NMR methodologies. Total program savings were estimated at 1,949 MWh for refrigerators and 887 MWh for freezers, representing a 42% and 37% decrease, respectively, compared to tracking database estimates.
develop a weighted annual energy consumption estimate for both conventional and ENERGY STAR dehumidifiers. Specifically, the study looked at six capacity classes of dehumidifiers, all with varying energy factors, and developed annual consu...
AI summary A study estimated annual energy consumption for conventional and ENERGY STAR dehumidifiers using data from the FOE report and the DSM Administrator. The study used a weighted approach based on market share in Wisconsin and operating time assumptions, highlighting differences in capacity and energy factors between studies.
Page 22 Our evaluated UEC estimates for both conventional and ENERGY STAR qualified dehumidifiers were significantly lower than those listed in the tracking spreadsheet (Table 3-14). Table 3-14: Dehumidifier UEC Estimates Tracked Evaluated...
AI summary The evaluated unit energy consumption (UEC) estimates for dehumidifiers are significantly lower than those in the tracking spreadsheet. Despite this, the evaluated savings per unit are higher than the tracked estimates. The total program savings for dehumidifiers show an increase of 7.6% compared to program estimates.
s Meter Generator Meter Generator Energy Savings (MWh) 4,841 5,416 2,911 3,256 We calculated the demand savings for the replacement program by obtaining the ratio of all residential target peak demand savings to target energy savings for t...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings and demand savings calculations for a replacement program, including refrigerator replacements in multifamily residential buildings. It provides data on energy consumption before and after replacements and calculates demand savings using an energy-to-demand ratio of 4.8.
Savings—Replacement Program Total Savings Meter Generator Energy Savings (MWh) 179 200 3.3.2 Evaluated Program Impacts Based on the program‘s tracking database, NMR determined that the program was replacing retired equipment with two diffe...
AI summary The Savings—Replacement Program evaluated the energy savings from replacing old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR qualified models. The program's energy consumption estimates were significantly lower than those from other studies due to differences in the age and type of refrigerators replaced.
rators, resulting in total program savings of 134 MWh at the meter and 150 MWh at the generator.30 These savings represented a 25% decrease in comparison to the tracked savings estimates. (Table 3-22) Table 3-22: Replacement Program Energy...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from a refrigerator replacement program, noting that actual savings were lower than tracked estimates. It provides data on unit energy consumption and calculates demand savings using a 4.8 energy-to-demand ratio, resulting in 27.9 kW savings at the meter and 31.2 kW at the generator.
lacement together had made a big difference. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs Page 39 4.5.3 Staff and Contractor Perspectives Program staff and contractors believed that cost savings were the primary motiv...
AI summary The ARR program provided cost savings and convenience for participants, encouraging appliance retirement and replacement. Property managers participated due to cost savings, and contractors noted that the program removed barriers to replacing appliances. Most respondents had already considered disposing of appliances before learning about the program.
influential. Note, however, that a substantial number of respondents in the dehumidifier group gave a ―Don‘t know/Refused‖ response, suggesting that they had not been given any information or advice. Table 4-13: Influence of Program Inform...
AI summary The influence of program information and advice on participation decisions was assessed, with a majority of respondents indicating that information was extremely influential. However, a significant portion of respondents in the dehumidifier group did not know or refused to answer, suggesting a lack of information dissemination. One participant noted that while incentives and services were extremely influential, the information received was only somewhat influential.
Y. IF RESPONSE INDICATES WOULD HAVE GOTTEN RID OF UNIT, GO BACK TO FFR3 AND CLARIFY RESPONSE, ASKING FFR4 THROUGH FFR7 IF NECESSARY] 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Refused) DHR9. Nova Scotia Power paid for the dehumidifier to be removed from your h...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question regarding the influence of financial incentives and program information on participation in Nova Scotia Power's appliance retirement program, specifically focusing on the removal of a dehumidifier.
Program Performance and Savings Findings Recommendations EEH-F14. EEH-R14. NMR found that the program was double counting savings for a The new program should remove the potential for double counting number of measures. Any of the five hea...
AI summary The document highlights issues with double counting savings in the EEH program, particularly for heat pump measures, solar hot water heaters, and water heater tank insulation. It recommends removing double counting by using prescriptive savings only for measures that do not impact EnerGuide ratings. It also suggests coordination between the new program and any new houses program.
Table 1-1: EnerGuide Existing Houses Electric Incentives 2009 2010 Measure Incentive Incentive Houses with Electric Heating Systems High efficiency ductless air to air heat pumps with electric NA $750 backup High efficiency central (―ducte...
AI summary Table 1-1 outlines electric incentives for EnerGuide Existing Houses for the years 2009 and 2010, including incentives for various heating systems and thermal storage units, with some measures showing increased incentives in 2010.
ter systems. Energy Evaluators input pre-retrofit information into HOT2000 software and upload the data to NRCan. The Energy Evaluators prepare a pre-retrofit report that includes an initial EnerGuide rating and recommendations for energy...
AI summary The 2010 Existing Houses Program involves pre- and post-retrofit evaluations using HOT2000 software, with Energy Evaluators submitting data to NRCan. Homeowners receive rebates after retrofit activities, and the program assumes sufficient marketing and availability of evaluators.
Skills and equipment. Delivery Agents have the equipment, tools and skills required to complete evaluations of participating homes or they can contract for such services. Understanding of savings. Homeowners will understand the energy...
AI summary The text outlines key aspects of a home energy efficiency program, including the skills and resources required for successful implementation, the expected energy and financial savings for participants, and potential barriers such as lack of awareness, cost concerns, and training needs. It also highlights short-term outcomes like increased participant awareness.
vings reduce the need for new generation. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 6 1.2 Logic Model Figure 1-1: EnerGuide Existing Houses Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 7 2 Impact Evalua...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program assesses energy savings by comparing pre- and post-audit data from 87 homes. The study calculates savings per EnerGuide point and applies these values to the program's tracking database. The program reported 1,516 participants with 9.72 GWh of meter savings and 10.88 GWh of generator savings in 2010.
Wh of energy savings at the meter and 10.88 GWh of energy savings at the generator. (Table 2-1)[10][11] Generator savings were calculated by applying a line loss factor of 1.1188 to the meter savings. Table 2-1: Tracking Database Savings—2...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for a demand-side management program in 2010, distinguishing between savings at the meter and generator levels. It mentions the use of EnerGuide point savings and prescriptive measure savings to estimate total energy savings, referencing the Low Income Houses program and specific savings values.
ETS central hydronic system 45 ETS room unit 10 The prescriptive savings were added to the EnerGuide point savings. The equation below gives an example of how savings would have been calculated for a project that had a D pre-audit EnerGuid...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from the EEH program using EnerGuide ratings and prescriptive measures such as programmable thermostats and ETS room units. It also provides average pre- and post-audit EnerGuide ratings and the frequency of installed measures.
2.4 Prescriptive Savings As previously mentioned, the total program savings listed in the program‘s tracking spreadsheet were calculated by adding the prescriptive savings values listed in Table 2-2 to a per EnerGuide point savings estimat...
AI summary The document discusses the method used to calculate program savings, highlighting the potential for double counting when certain measures are included in both HOT2000 modeling and prescriptive savings. To address this, only four measures were assigned prescriptive savings, while others were captured in a fixed energy savings value per EnerGuide point increase.
Table 2-6: Comparison of Detailed Tracking and Evaluated Savings Estimates Tracking Savings Evaluated Savings Estimate Number of Estimate (MWh) (MWh) Projects Meter Generator Meter Generator EnerGuide rating 1,46824 8,288 9,272 9,418 10,53...
AI summary Table 2-6 compares detailed tracking and evaluated savings estimates for various energy efficiency programs, showing the number of projects and corresponding savings in MWh for both meter and generator categories.
16, 2003 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 18 2.7 Energy Savings Estimation Table 2-11 presents the final estimates of savings for the EEH program including the impact of free- ridership. The evaluated energ...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program shows that energy savings exceeded the program's goals, with 7,274 MWh at the meter and 8,138 MWh at the generator, and demand savings of 1,943 kW at the meter and 2,174 kW at the generator. This was calculated using a line loss factor of 1.1188 and accounted for free-ridership.
70 +9.6% NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 20 3.2 Program Goals and Design The 2010 EEH program had a target of 4,930 MWh of energy savings and 1,410 kW of demand savings. The 2010 EEH program was jointly sp...
AI summary The 2010 EEH program aimed for 4,930 MWh of energy savings and 1,410 kW of demand savings. It was jointly sponsored by the DSM Administrator, CNS, and NRCan, but NRCan ended rebate support in March 2010, earlier than planned. The program's continuation past March 31, 2011, is uncertain, and no replacement program has been confirmed.
g and articles in publications. NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 21 3.3.2 Contractor Training and Contractual Relationships The Delivery Agents have contracts with the Province of Nova Scotia (via CNS) to o...
AI summary The EEH program in Nova Scotia relies on Delivery Agents who have contracts with the Province via CNS and NRCan. Customer responsibility for selecting contractors is highlighted as a potential gap, and Delivery Agents report increased burdens due to quality assurance requirements and reduced participation.
he measures rebated by the program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 22 3.5 Program Tracking and Reporting Delivery Agents were responsible for using the HOT2000 software from NRCan to create audit reports...
AI summary The document discusses the tracking and reporting processes for the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, highlighting issues with information sharing between NRCan, CNS, and the DSM Administrator. It also notes that consolidation under the new Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) may help resolve these issues.
6% NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 27 Table 3-8 shows measure uptake (installations as a percentage of recommendations), estimated annual energy savings, EEH program incentive amount, and cost per kWh of a...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, analyzing measure uptake, energy savings, and program incentives. It introduces a Measure Effectiveness Index, which identifies electronic thermostats, heat pumps, and insulation as particularly effective measures.
Table 3-8: Effectiveness of Measures Per Unit Cost Annual per Energy Per Unit kWh of Measure Measure Savings EEH annual Effectiveness Uptake (kWh/yr) Incentive savings Index High efficiency air to air heat pump with 70% 7,208 $1,200 $0.17...
AI summary This table evaluates the effectiveness of various energy efficiency measures, including high-efficiency heat pumps, thermostats, and insulation, based on annual energy savings, incentives, and cost per kWh. The data highlights the performance of these measures in the context of the Energy Efficient Homes (EEH) program.
on, advice, or services provided by a contractor was the least influential factor with about two out of five respondents (41%) giving the factor a rating of extremely or very influential. (Table 3-10) Table 3-10: Influence of Various Facto...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of various factors on respondents' decisions to install energy efficiency measures. Program incentives and rebates were the most influential, followed by information from energy audits. Contractors' advice was less influential. In 2010, many respondents installed non-program-recommended measures, such as additional insulation and new windows.
isfied 9 13 Dissatisfied 5 5 Don‘t know 5 10 In an on-site visit where NMR accompanied the Energy Advisor to an ―E‖ audit, the customer remarked that they had observed an immediate and substantial difference in their electric bill as a res...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program found that 41% of participants believed the EEH program should offer rebates for additional upgrades, ranging from renewable power to energy-efficient appliances.
................................................ 1 TABLE B-5: IMPACT OF MEASURES .................................................................................................................. 2 Figures FIGURE 1-1: RESIDENTIAL ENERGY AF...
AI summary The document presents an evaluation of the 2010 Low Income Households Program, including figures and tables that analyze the impact of energy efficiency measures. It references the PRISM approach and the LIREAP program, highlighting efforts to improve residential energy affordability.
designed. LIH-F14. LIH-R14. The Delivery Agents reported that the protocol for replacing The DSM Administrator should review and update the refrigerators and freezers was burdensome and that they were not guidebook for determining the manu...
AI summary The Delivery Agents found the protocol for replacing refrigerators and freezers burdensome and not properly equipped to determine appliance ages. Program staff suggested separating Scope I and Scope II audits to increase cost effectiveness, and emphasized the need for stakeholder involvement in program design changes.
ngs estimates for energy efficiency improvements. Increased awareness of the LIH program in Nova Scotia low-income population. Through word-of-mouth and other channels, awareness of the LIH program and its benefits spreads among the low-...
AI summary The document outlines the outcomes of the Low Income Households (LIH) Program in Nova Scotia, emphasizing increased awareness, receptivity, and contractor participation. Long-term outcomes include sustained energy savings, reduced bills, improved economic well-being, and emission reductions.
In considering what might be driving the low realization rate for this program, we looked at ten HOT2000 reports each from the three 2010 program Delivery Agents. In examining these 30 reports, we found an average space heating consumption...
AI summary The analysis found a significant discrepancy between estimated and actual space heating electricity usage in the LIH program, with billing data showing much lower consumption than reported in HOT2000 and Conserve Nova Scotia reports. This led to the development of a more conservative alternative estimate for program impacts.
Meter Generator Energy (MWh) 1,129 1,264 Demand (kW) 251 281.2 In the final analysis, however, the billing data approach was based on actual consumption data for the low income population and thus may be considered more reliable than extra...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households (LIH) program, comparing billing data with survey estimates to assess energy savings. It highlights the use of actual consumption data for low-income households and discusses the process evaluation involving interviews and surveys to ensure cost-effective energy-saving measures are implemented.
sticity is present, the OLS regression coefficients are unbiased estimates of the true parameters, but they are subject to greater statistical variation than the appropriate estimates. Moreover, the standard errors produced by the OLS regr...
AI summary The text discusses the use of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and its limitations in the presence of heteroscedasticity, and introduces Weighted Least Squares (WLS) as a method to address this issue. It also explains the concept of confidence intervals in statistical estimation.
2.1 Program Description The NH program was administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS). The DSM Administrator joined the program in 2009 by adding incentives for specific measures. The new independent program administrator, Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The NH program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia and later by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, provides rebates for energy efficiency upgrades in new homes, including heat pumps, thermal storage systems, and water heating improvements. The program involves certified Energy Advisors and Delivery Agents to evaluate and implement upgrades.
2000program.html. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 8 Through the NH program, electrically heated houses receiving a final EnerGuide rating of 85 or higher were eligible for an additional incentive of $300. This increased substan...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program provided incentives for electrically heated homes achieving high EnerGuide ratings. The program was re-launched as PerformancePlus with higher rebates and additional solar incentives. Registration fees were rebated for homes achieving specific EnerGuide ratings before September 7, 2010, but this was discontinued afterward.
Adequate availability of Energy Evaluators. NRCan is able to train a sufficient number of Delivery Agents/Energy Evaluators to model the house plans and audit the completed house. Skills and equipment. Delivery Agents/Energy Evaluators...
AI summary The document discusses program enablers and barriers related to energy efficiency initiatives. Enablers include availability of trained evaluators, proper skills and equipment, and availability of materials. Barriers include lack of awareness, reluctance to change practices, and cost-driven construction.
74 Programmable electronic thermostat 643 13 watt CFL compatible fixtures 43 NMR validated the prescriptive savings listed in the tracking spreadsheet through a review of the 2009 Low Income Households (LIH) report and the Ontario Power Au...
AI summary NMR reviewed the prescriptive savings values in the tracking spreadsheet, adjusting the annual savings for programmable thermostats and CFL fixtures based on reports from 2009 and 2010. Adjustments were made to align with more conservative estimates and recommendations from the LIH report.
four builders indicated that their budgets could have accommodated the full cost, including the incentives, of the energy efficient upgrades they had incorporated into the participating houses. NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program indicates that most builders and homeowners believed their budgets could have covered the full cost of energy-efficient upgrades, including incentives, without the need for rebates.
(Refused) NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A6 Section 2 – Satisfaction with program 14. Thinking of your OVERALL experience with the EnerGuide for New Houses Program up to this point, including any services receive...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about participant satisfaction with the EnerGuide for New Houses Program, including reasons for dissatisfaction such as delays in rebate processing, insufficient rebate amounts, and excessive paperwork.
2 3 4 5 9 from review of home no extremely DK plans influence influential NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A11 d. The EnerGuide label 1 2 3 4 5 9 and designation itself no extremely DK influence influential Now I w...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about awareness and understanding of recent energy efficiency changes in Nova Scotia's building code, as well as training received on energy-efficient construction practices and methods for compliance.
s with DSM Administrator staff and the implementation contractors, as well as telephone surveys with program participants. All the interview guides and survey instruments were developed by NMR staff. Impact Evaluation Findings The DI progr...
AI summary The DI program has shown strong performance with energy and demand savings exceeding goals in 2010. Energy savings were 25,233 MWh and demand savings were 5,291 kW, surpassing the program's targets. The evaluation was conducted through interviews and surveys by NMR staff.
The DI program's marketing and outreach channels include direct contact through a subcontractor, the program contractor, and partnerships with local business associations such as chambers of commerce and business improvement areas. Program...
AI summary The DI program utilizes various marketing and outreach strategies, including partnerships with local business associations, telephone outreach, and on-site visits, to promote energy efficiency initiatives to small businesses. Program activities include training representatives, obtaining program products, and installing energy-efficient lighting.
e-existing conditions. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 8 3 Impact Evaluation The NMR team evaluated the impacts of the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install Program through on- site visits to...
AI summary The NMR team evaluated the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install Program by conducting on-site visits and using engineering algorithms to estimate energy savings. A total of 41,349 MWh in energy savings was tracked across 5,447 locations, with the majority of installations consisting of 13W CFL twist style bulbs.
ing purposes Program Administrators and the NMR Team collapsed some sites to reflect all activity performed at the site in instances where installations at a given location occurred over several days. Table 3-1: Population Summary Quantity...
AI summary The document discusses the installation of energy-efficient products under the Efficient Products Direct Install program, including the use of Model-Based Statistical Sampling (MBSS) to evaluate program impact. It includes a summary table of installations and energy savings across various product types and mentions that the program year had approximately six weeks left at the time of sampling.
Install time-of-use lighting loggers to gather operating hours of unique schedules identified on- site; Collect available information with which to assess interactive effects. 3.2.3 Lighting Loggers So as to compile the most accurate d...
AI summary Lighting loggers were installed to collect operating hours data for various room types, and standard analysis spreadsheets were used to calculate demand and energy savings, both with and without interactive effects, using pre- and post-retrofit information.
hedule of the lighting at the 5PM-6PM hour for each location according to information provided by each site contact. Peak kW Savings = Connected kW Savings Coincidenc e Factor The fundamental calculation of annual energy savings is...
AI summary The text provides formulas for calculating peak kW savings and annual energy savings based on lighting logger data. It mentions the use of a 7.1% multiplier to account for line losses associated with the Small General Commercial customer class.
KEMA calculated the impact of interactive effects for each site. In the context of energy savings analysis, the term ―interactive effect‖ refers to a related change in another devices‘ electrical use as influenced by the implementation of...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects in energy savings analysis, particularly focusing on how energy conservation measures, such as lighting retrofits, influence heating and cooling systems. Interactive savings are determined using factors like direct lighting kW reduction, coincidence factors, and system efficiencies, with simplified methods used for reliable estimates.
0.90 Refrigerated Area 2.00 Water to Air Heat Pump 4.21 Non-Electric 40.0 The following calculations were used in the instances that electric heating occurred in the space equipped with retrofitted lighting. However, the majority of sites...
AI summary The text discusses calculations for heating kWh and kW energy savings related to the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. It uses factors like the energy interaction factor (0.15) and demand interaction factor (0.133) between lighting and heating systems, and notes that most sites were heated via oil or gas, which had minimal impact on interactive savings.
There were two sites that required unique methods to estimate their energy savings. One facility operating as a furniture retailer had received 22 – 13 W CFL‘s to replace 60 W incandescent bulbs used in display lamps. It was determined tha...
AI summary The text discusses the estimation of energy savings from two unique sites. One site involved a furniture retailer where some CFLs were sold, and the other was an apartment complex with limited access. Savings were calculated using data from a New England study and stratified ratio estimation techniques.
77% 83% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 22 3.7 Energy Savings Estimation Table 3-13 presents the net installed annual energy and demand savings for the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install p...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install program achieved significant energy and demand savings, exceeding its goals and surpassing the combined savings of previous years. The majority of savings came from CFL installations, with LED Exit Lights contributing a smaller portion. The program showed substantial growth compared to 2008 and 2009.
1 6 5 4 3 Reduce carbon † 4 2 3 11 footprint Reduce σ† 3 10 <1 13 maintenance costs Improve existing 3 9 5 4 lighting conditions Past program 1 participation Part of a green 1 initiative Assistance with 1 changing lighting Offer at our 1 f...
AI summary The text presents a table with various initiatives aimed at reducing carbon footprint, improving lighting conditions, and reducing maintenance costs. It also includes information on past program participation, assistance with changing lighting, and other initiatives. The table includes responses categorized under different headings such as 'Other' and 'Don‘t know'.
installation σ σ Installation process 61 90% 10 0 0 0 66 80% 12 8 0 0 67 84% 13 3 Installers or contractors doing the 61 89% 10 2 0 0 65 84% 12 3 <1 61 82% 13 5 installation work Completion of project on 63 84% 10 5 2 0 64 86% 11 3 <1 0 65...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program evaluation found that energy costs accounted for an average of 18% of annual operating budgets, with less than 20% for 63% of respondents and more than 20% for 40% of respondents.
ow/Don‘t recall) On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all important‘ and 5=‗very important‘, how important is reducing energy usage to your company / organization? [9 = Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all im...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to energy usage importance, energy cost management, and the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs. It also asks for suggestions to improve the Efficient Lighting Products Program and collects information on business operating hours.
ny independent, or part of a larger company? Independent Part of a larger company Don‘t know Refused Other ( _) 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) NMR Process and Impact Evaluation: Prescriptive Rebate Programs 2010 February 25, 2011 Final Repor...
AI summary This document outlines the final report of a process and impact evaluation of prescriptive rebate programs conducted in 2010, submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation by NMR Group, Inc. The evaluation was carried out by a team of principal investigators and includes contributions from KEMA, Inc.
.......................................................................................................................................... 42 TABLE 5-18: RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE PROGRAM......................................................
AI summary The document presents tables and figures related to program recommendations, building activity, and the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs. It includes data on floor space, workers, and company types, as well as logic models for energy rebate programs.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page I Executive Summary This report presents the results of the 2010 process and impact evaluations of the Business Energy Rebate (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs conducte...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 Business Energy Rebate (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs conducted by NMR Group, Inc. for Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The evaluation includes site visits and interviews, with a focus on the impact of the SLC program, which is expected to be rendered obsolete by upcoming legislation mandating high-performance T8 lighting.
at someone outside In 2011, the BER program should continue to build their organizations had been responsible for specifying the measures awareness and reach with customers. Contractors and that were installed through the BER program. In a...
AI summary The BER program in 2011 was expected to continue building awareness and reach with customers through contractors and design professionals. Seven out of eleven respondents indicated that contractors or design professionals were responsible for specifying equipment installed through the program.
Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation BER-F3. BER-R3. Customers were motivated to participate in the BER program primarily When working with customers and training contractors, because of a financial benefit—nine said energy...
AI summary The BER program was primarily motivated by financial benefits, with energy savings and bill reduction being the main drivers. Nearly all participants found the program easy to use, though one faced a delay in determining eligibility. Recommendations include improving customer support and resource allocation.
r inquiries; and, when appropriate, to elevate customers quickly to the C&I Custom program if their projects appear to be too complex to be quickly approved. BER-F5. BER-R5. The majority of respondents were satisfied with the program. On a...
AI summary Respondents are generally satisfied with the BER program, but express dissatisfaction with rebate amounts. The program is noted as being new, and there is a recognition that incentive levels may need adjustment over time based on participant feedback.
1.1 Program Theory Program Background The BER program was primarily designed to be a Resource Acquisition program with the objective of helping businesses throughout Nova Scotia with the purchase of energy efficient equipment. However, the...
AI summary The BER program aims to help businesses in Nova Scotia acquire energy-efficient equipment through rebates, with a long-term goal of transforming market practices. The process includes outreach, product identification, authorization, installation, and rebate processing.
oming aware of the program, customers identify and purchase energy efficient equipment. Customers install energy efficient equipment. After purchasing energy efficient equipment, customers install the energy efficient equipment. Mid-Term...
AI summary The document outlines the outcomes of the BER program, including energy savings, bill reductions, increased knowledge about energy efficiency, and long-term benefits such as emission reductions and avoidance of new plant construction. The program encourages the adoption of energy-efficient equipment by businesses.
ficient products and services as standard practices. Due to first-hand experience, energy efficient products become standard practice for business customers throughout the province. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page...
AI summary The document discusses the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, which provides financial incentives for the installation of high-performance T8 lighting in non-residential facilities in Nova Scotia. The program is expected to become obsolete once legislation mandating the use of High Performance T8 lighting is enacted.
balance of the incentive to the buyer, in the form of a reduced price. Program Marketing by Distributors. Distributors market the program to electrical contractors and end users. 4 As of October of 2009, eligible products included HP T8F...
AI summary The document outlines a prescriptive rebate program that provides incentives to distributors for selling eligible lighting products. Distributors market the program to electrical contractors and end users, and incentives are offered per lamp and ballast sold.
ses for smaller projects. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 7 Short-Term Outcomes All eligible distributors are enrolled into the program. Distributors become more active in the program and continue promoting the...
AI summary The document outlines the short-term, mid-term, and long-term outcomes of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on the increased adoption of high-performance (HP) lighting, improved lighting quality, energy savings, and long-term emission reductions and infrastructure avoidance.
ons. Avoidance of plant construction. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 8 2.2 Program Logic Model Figure 2-1: Smart Lighting Choices Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 9 3...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on the Smart Lighting Choices Program and the Building Efficiency Rebate (BER) program. It discusses program logic models, population data, and energy savings achieved in 2010.
visited, including the project number, type of equipment installed, and tracking connected demand and energy savings. Our on-site sample represented nearly one-third of the total 2010 tracked savings. Table 3-2: 2010 BER Population Trackin...
AI summary The text provides a summary of the 2010 BER Population Tracking Summary (Sample Frame), detailing energy and demand savings from various projects. The sample represents nearly one-third of the total tracked savings, with specific data on each project's category, energy savings in MWh, and connected demand savings in kW.
0.2 K-11 Lighting 132.9 31.6 Total 203.4 47.7 At the conclusion of 2010, the NMR team received the final file of program activity. As noted earlier, there were two more sites that received rebates between when the sample was pulled and the...
AI summary The NMR team evaluated the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs by reviewing documentation and visiting sites to verify savings. Two additional sites were included due to their high savings, and savings were calculated using on-site data and program documentation. The evaluation covered lighting, motors and drives, and HVAC measures.
of the approach taken for each NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 11 measure type included in the sample. The evaluated savings used the most accurate information available; secondary sources and assumptions were empl...
AI summary This section evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on lighting savings analysis. It outlines the formula used by the DSM Administrator to calculate energy savings, including interactive effects such as cooling credits and heating penalties.
xture and lamp make and model. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 12 The quantity of lamps or fixtures installed was verified on-site through observation and through discussion with the site contact. The site contacts...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on verifying the quantity of installed lamps and fixtures, estimating annual operating hours, and calculating energy savings, including interactive savings from cooling systems.
priate type and size of the cooling system were applied. The total energy savings for lighting projects was the combination of the connected load energy savings and cooling interactive energy savings. Lighting Results A summary of lighting...
AI summary The evaluation of lighting projects from the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs shows that total energy savings were 514.9 MWh with a realization rate of 104%. Variations in operating hours significantly affected savings estimates, with some sites showing decreases and others increases. Interactive effects also influenced the savings calculations.
kW savings of 75.5. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 13 Table 3-3: Lighting Savings Results Evaluated Savings Tracking Peak Demand Project # Savings (MWh) Energy (MWh) (kW) K-07 5.8 2.1 1.4 K-09 13.0 4.8 0.5 K-10 0....
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on lighting and motor/drive savings. Table 3-3 summarizes the savings from various projects, with total energy savings of 514.9 MWh and peak demand savings of 75.5 kW. The analysis discusses the use of variable frequency drives (VFDs) for motor efficiency, highlighting the methodology for calculating energy savings.
uilding, and prescriptive savings were appropriate. For this project, the energy and demand savings used the same methodology as the tracking savings estimates: Energy Savings ESF motor hpCXS Peak Demand Savings DSFmotor hpC...
AI summary The document describes the methodology used to calculate energy and peak demand savings for motor efficiency projects. It outlines formulas involving energy savings factors, motor horsepower, and commissioning savings factors, as well as load profile and hourly bin analysis for projects with unique operating conditions.
Flow0 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 14 Where: Ppre = input power of existing equipment for each flow bin, watts. Ppost = input power of new equipment for each flow bin, watts. HoursPre = annual operating hours o...
AI summary The document evaluates 2010 prescriptive rebate programs by calculating energy savings from motor upgrades. It details formulas for determining input power before and after equipment replacement, including assumptions about motor efficiency and operating conditions. All sampled projects used constant speed motors without flow control.
ews. All three of the sampled projects had constant speed motors with no flow control mechanism. 6 Electric Power Research Institute, Adjustable Speed Drives Directory, Table 3.1, p18, 1991 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Progra...
AI summary The document discusses sampled projects with constant speed motors lacking flow control mechanisms and references a table from the Electric Power Research Institute's Adjustable Speed Drives Directory from 1991.
Table 3.1, p18, 1991 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 15
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on their effectiveness and outcomes. It provides insights into the programs' impact and performance in the context of energy efficiency initiatives.
8 25 100 56 68 6 20 100 51 64 5 Each of the projects had unique operating conditions. Data collection was limited by control system software and the knowledge of the staff. Equipment schedules and load profiles were collected. For one proj...
AI summary The document discusses the unique operating conditions of VFD projects, highlighting data collection limitations and discrepancies in motor sizes. It notes that savings estimates were higher than expected due to differences in baseline operating hours and actual motor usage.
1 1 1,000 SEER Pre SEER Post 1 Energy Savings H QTYCapacityH EFLH H 1 1 1,000 HSPFPre HSPFPost 1 Peak Demand Savings Winter QTYCapacityH CF 1 1 1,000 HSPFPre HS...
AI summary The text presents mathematical formulas for calculating energy savings and peak demand savings related to heating systems, using metrics such as SEER, HSPF, and capacity factors. These calculations are likely used in energy efficiency evaluations or program assessments.
nits less than 65 kBTU/hr was 57%. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 18 HVAC Results Two of the four HVAC evaluated savings estimates fell within 15% of one another. One of them (K-01) was around 60% higher. There we...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs found discrepancies between tracked and evaluated HVAC savings estimates. Differences arose from variations in full load hours, SEER ratings, and the inclusion of only heating demand savings for peak demand calculations. Evaluated savings were significantly higher than tracked savings, with a 140.5% realization rate.
8.4 11.8 2.9 12.6 3.1 Total 791.8 871.9 126.1 932.0 134.8 3.4 Spillover NMR surveyed a total of eleven participants, the sample for the survey was drawn from participants who either completed or are in the process of implementing a project...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility Board (NMR) conducted a spillover analysis for the Building Efficiency Rebate (BER) program, finding no instances of participant-like or non-like spillover among 2010 program participants. This was attributed to the availability of other rebate programs and the participant's focus on taking advantage of all available incentives.
503.3 72.8 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 25 4 Impact Evaluation: SLC The following impact evaluation of the 2010 SLC program includes an overview of the DSM Administrator-tracked program savings, a description of...
AI summary The 2010 SLC program's impact evaluation includes savings tracked by the DSM Administrator, based on distributor-reported data. In 2010, 378,812 lamps and 115,808 ballasts were rebated, with a significant portion being F28 lamps and two-lamp ballasts. The evaluation excludes savings from the Small Business Lighting Solutions and C&I Custom Program projects.
100% because of rounding. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 26 Table 4-2 shows the savings associated with the 66,140 ballasts and 239,507 lamps sold through the program. To determine the energy savings associated wi...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on ballasts and lamps sold. The DSM Administrator assumed T8 standard electronic ballasts as the baseline, with adjustments made for retrofit projects. Savings estimates were calculated using lamp proportions, wattage reductions, and annual usage hours.
Table 4-2: Ballast and Bulb System Savings Summary Watts Energy Savings Replacing T12F34 Lamp System… Ballasts Lamps Reduced (MWh) … of 30 Watts with 1-Lamp… HPT8F32 (27 Watts) 1,295 1,295 3 13.2 HPT8F28 (24 Watts) 2,500 2,500 6 51.0 HPT8F...
AI summary Table 4-2 presents the energy savings from replacing traditional T12F34 lamp systems with more efficient HPT8F32, HPT8F28, and HPT8F25 systems, showing reductions in watts and corresponding energy savings in MWh across various configurations.
rmation to further inform our analysis. Included in the analysis was an examination of the 2009 evaluation, which included a total of 41 telephone surveys (30 electrical contractors and 11 end users). 4.2.1 Transaction Paper Audit As part...
AI summary The 2010 impact evaluation of the SLC program involved a transaction paper audit where the NMR team verified sales records from four primary distributors against the DSM Administrator's tracking system. The audit confirmed consistency between distributor records and the tracking system, as well as between distributor-reported sales and program savings calculations.
ate of a 93% installation rate. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 28
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, with a focus on achieving a 93% installation rate. The Nova Scotia Utility Board (NMR) is involved in the evaluation process.
10 http://www.dpuc.state.ct.us/dockcurr.nsf/8e6fc37a54110e3e852576190052b64d/c530ebcb3a3e701f852577af005d 20e6?OpenDocument 11 http://www.ma-eeac.org/docs/MA%20TRM_2011%20PLAN%20VERSION.PDF NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Progra...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on lighting usage in electrically conditioned spaces. Data from site visits for various DSM Administrator programs, including the Smart Lighting Choices, Small Business Lighting Solutions, and Efficient Products - Direct Install programs, were analyzed to calculate weighted averages for lighting in cooled and heated spaces.
ncy of the heating equipment. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 31 4.3 Program Impact Results Table 4-5 presents the final estimates of savings for the SLC program based upon the analyses described above. This table...
AI summary This section presents the final estimates of energy savings from the SLC program in 2010, including both meter and generator-level data. The analysis includes annual energy savings and peak demand reductions, based on survey data and line loss factors.
Sampling Error at 90% Population Sample Size (n) Confidence Interval Participants 2010 30 11 +20.1% 5.2 Program Goals and Design The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program was a new addition to the DSM Administrator‘s portfolio of energy eff...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program, launched in mid-2010, provided financial incentives for businesses to purchase energy-efficient equipment. It was modeled after successful programs like Efficiency Vermont and aimed to increase market penetration of efficient technologies and raise customer awareness of energy-efficient products.
y the C&I Sales Lead, through a marketing subcontractor, Delivery Agents, and an outbound calling center. In addition, the program was advertised in newspapers and on the DSM Administrator‘s website. 5.4 Measure Installations Respondents t...
AI summary The 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs were promoted through various channels including marketing subcontractors, delivery agents, and a calling center, as well as newspaper and website advertisements. Survey responses indicated that participants installed energy-efficient lighting, HVAC equipment, and new motors or variable speed drives, though some respondents could not recall specific installations.
subsequent questions. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 35 Nearly one-half of the respondents (5 out of 11) said that the person most responsible for specifying equipment to install in their business was a contractor...
AI summary Nearly half of the respondents indicated that contractors were most responsible for specifying equipment to install in their businesses under the BER program. Other responsible parties included outside design professionals, utility account managers, manufacturer representatives, and internal company personnel.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 37 Respondents were also asked why they had decided to install energy efficient equipment. Table 5-6 shows respondents‘ most and second most important motivations by type of equipm...
AI summary Respondents cited saving on energy bills as the most common motivation for installing energy-efficient equipment, with additional motivations including improving lighting conditions, reducing maintenance costs, and taking advantage of program incentives.
1 2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 39 Respondents were asked four questions about actions they would have taken in the absence of the BER program. (Table 5-9) As the questions were asked separately, respondents we...
AI summary Respondents were asked about their actions without the BER program. Results show that some would have postponed installation, others would not have installed equipment, and some would have installed less efficient equipment.
9 3 6 Installing less energy efficient equipment 9 5 4 Installing the same quantity of equipment 9 3 5 1 Eight out of the nine respondents indicated that their budget could have accommodated the equipment that had been installed in the abs...
AI summary Eight out of nine respondents indicated that their budgets could have accommodated the equipment installed without program rebates, suggesting that the rebates may not have been essential for the installations. The table provides data on budget capabilities for different types of equipment.
8 No Don‘t know 1 1 Respondents rated the influence of various aspects of the BER program on their decision to participate in the program on a scale from one (―not at all influential‖) to five (―very influential‖). Information, services, o...
AI summary Respondents evaluated the influence of various aspects of the BER program on their participation. Information and advice from contractors and NSPI representatives were the most influential, while rebates and program information were only moderately influential.
1 3 1 3 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 40 5.6.2 Spillover When respondents were asked whether they had installed any additional equipment of the type they had installed through the BER program (i.e., additional li...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs found that respondents did not install additional equipment of the same type as those covered by the BER program. However, three respondents reported being influenced to take other energy efficiency actions, such as installing HVAC upgrades and occupancy sensors.
from the 2010 impact evaluation. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 41 5.7 Energy Attitudes and Importance As shown in Table 5-14, all of the respondents indicated that managing energy was important to their business....
AI summary The evaluation indicates that all respondents consider energy management important to their business, with energy usage reduction and cost management rated highly. Most respondents reported energy costs as a small portion of their annual budget, except for one respondent whose energy costs constituted 60% of their operating budget.
were a far greater proportion of their operating costs with energy costs making up 60% of their total budget. (Table 5-15) Table 5-15: Energy Costs as a Percent of Annual Operating Budget Percent of Budget 2010 Sample size (n) 11 Less than...
AI summary The text discusses energy costs as a significant portion of operating budgets, with 60% of a sample group's budget attributed to energy costs. Table 5-15 provides statistical data on the distribution of energy costs as a percentage of annual operating budgets in 2010.
acing equipment in the future NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 43 Seven of the eleven respondents gave suggestions for improving the program. Three respondents suggested that the program increase the rebate amounts,...
AI summary Seven of eleven respondents suggested improving the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs by increasing rebate amounts, clarifying eligible products, and improving user-friendliness of forms. One respondent recommended focusing on retrofits, and another suggested more direct customer-program staff communication.
1 More direct contact between customer and program staff 1 None 4 5.9 Firmographics The respondents represented a diverse variety of business types. (Table 5-19) Table 5-19: Principal Building Activity 2010 Sample size (n) 11 Retail (Other...
AI summary The text discusses the diversity of business types represented by respondents in the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, highlighting a range of principal building activities. It includes a table with sample sizes and categories of businesses.
68 Eight out of eleven respondents reported that their businesses were independent and not part of a larger company. (Table 5-23) Table 5-23: Type of Company 2010 Sample size (n) 11 Independent 8 Part of a larger company 3 Out of the nine...
AI summary The text reports that eight out of eleven respondents operate independent businesses, while three are part of larger companies. Additionally, five respondents have no other facilities in Nova Scotia, and four have between one and five other facilities. This data is from a survey conducted as part of the evaluation of the 2010 Business Energy Rebate and Smart Lighting Choices Programs.
A Interview Guides Participant Survey 2009-10 NSPI Business Energy Rebate Program DRAFT 8-6-10 Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY ―Perhaps you can help me anyway.‖ GO TO INTRODUCTION] [INTRODUCTION] He...
AI summary This document is a draft of an interview guide used to evaluate the 2009-10 Nova Scotia Power Business Energy Rebate Program. It includes a participant survey aimed at gathering feedback from businesses that participated in the program to help evaluate and improve it.
1. Outside design professional 2. Contractor 3. Manufacturer representative 4. Utility account manager 5. Someone within your company / organization 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Refused) [ASK V7/V8 FOR EACH MEASURE CATEGORY VERFIED IN V1 – V5; V1...
AI summary The text outlines a survey methodology used to gather information on factors motivating companies to install energy-efficient equipment across various categories, such as lighting, motors, and HVAC. It includes response options and instructions for data collection, focusing on program incentives, cost savings, and other motivations.
cility open? [998 = Don’t know, 999 = Refused] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program Page A14 F5. Is your company independent, or part of a larger company? 1. Independent 2. Part of a larger company 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Re...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide used to evaluate the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program by NMR Group, Inc. The guide includes questions about company independence, number of facilities in Nova Scotia, and interactions with Nova Scotia Power's energy efficiency programs. The evaluation focuses on free-ridership and spillover effects.
y represent your responses. No one but NMR staff members will listen to the recording. NMR will keep all recordings in its files. Do I have your permission to record the interview _ Yes _ No Background and interaction with staff 1. Are you...
AI summary This text outlines an interview process conducted by NMR with a representative from a company to gather information about their interaction with Nova Scotia Power's energy efficiency rebate programs, particularly the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program.
cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at understanding the experiences and challenges of participants in NSPI rebate programs, including barriers to participation, issues encountered, and satisfaction levels with various programs and interactions with NSPI staff.
the program 22. If you had not received the incentive from Nova Scotia Power, could your budget have accommodated the full cost of the energy efficient upgrades including the incentive? 23. How influential were the following elements to yo...
AI summary The text includes questions about the influence of various program elements on participation in the NSPI rebate programs, specifically the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program. It asks respondents to rate the influence of incentives, information, contractor services, and NSPI representatives on their decision to participate.
2 3 4 5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures...
AI summary The text asks respondents to consider energy-efficient equipment or upgrades their company has installed or is pursuing, and whether these measures are similar to those covered by NSPI rebate programs. It also inquires about the location of installations, whether the upgrades are being implemented through NSPI programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010.
ed post-measure implementation to determine the applicability of collected trend data. Where metering was performed and completed, site contacts were asked to identify the building areas where meters or loggers had been installed. By confi...
AI summary The document discusses the post-measure implementation evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on verifying the accuracy of metered data by confirming installation areas with site contacts. This process helps ensure that data is applied correctly in the DSM Administrator's M&V analysis.
0% for demand savings. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page 14 2.8 Energy Savings Estimation Table 2-10 presents the net installed annual energy and demand savings for the 2010 C&I Custom program. The net annual savings were base...
AI summary The 2010 C&I Custom Program achieved energy savings of 19,413 MWh and demand savings of 2,405.5 kW, falling short of the program's goals but showing significant improvement compared to 2008 and 2009 combined. The net savings were calculated using a 90% net-to-gross ratio derived from participant surveys and on-site observations.
3.2 Program Goals and Design The C&I Custom program was developed in-house by DSM Administrator staff; some features were modeled after the Manitoba Hydro Performance Optimization Program. The program offers incentives for commercial and i...
AI summary The C&I Custom program, developed by DSM Administrator staff, offers incentives for energy audits and efficiency improvements. It follows a four-stage process, including preliminary audits, feasibility studies, implementation, and verification. Some projects are directed to the BER program, while new construction is handled by the CINC program. The program aims to streamline incentives for custom projects requiring additional study.
ange calculated by the DSM Administrator. Once the implementation incentive had been determined, customers moved forward with implementation of the energy efficiency measures. Measurement & Verification (M&V) After completing implementatio...
AI summary The 2010 C&I Custom Program provided incentives for energy efficiency measures, including on-bill financing, energy audits, feasibility studies, and implementation. Incentives were capped at $500,000 per project and could not reduce a participant's simple payback below one year or exceed 50% of eligible costs.
3.2.2 Data Tracking In 2010, the C&I Custom program seemed to have reached a point where staff constraints created a bottleneck for evaluation. In the 2008 evaluation, NMR found that while „the C&I program had a well thought out and docume...
AI summary In 2010, the C&I Custom program faced bottlenecks due to an overly burdensome and non-scalable data-tracking process. Evaluation identified data entry errors at multiple sites, including incorrect savings entries and lack of scaling by peak coincidence factors. A centralized data system was implemented in summer 2010, though further refinement is needed.
^ Y ra NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A2 Project ID: C-4142145-1 1.0 Facility Overview This is a grocery distribution warehouse. The main areas of the facility include offices, loading docks, and extensive warehouse floor s...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from a 2010 C&I Custom Program project at a grocery distribution warehouse. New lighting systems were installed, resulting in energy and demand savings. Savings were recalculated after a site visit, and evaluated savings were 6.9% less than tracking savings.
d at 33% of the annual lighting operating hours. A heat gain factor of 0.208 was used in the spreadsheet. An electric heating penalty was not assessed for this facility as it is heated by #2 fuel oil. 5.0 On-Site Methodology A detailed lig...
AI summary The document details on-site methodology and observations from the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It outlines the inventory of lighting systems, the use of #2 fuel oil for heating, and discrepancies in wattage ratings for fixtures that affected savings calculations.
to 8 PM Thursday through Friday, 8 AM to 6 PM Saturday, and 10 AM to 5 PM Sunday. Employees typically arrive and leave the facility 15 minutes before opening and 30 minutes after closing respectively. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document outlines a lighting renovation project at a facility, including energy and demand savings from the retrofit. Customer savings were 25% less than tracking savings, and generator savings were adjusted to account for transmission and distribution losses. The project involved replacing high-wattage lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient alternatives.
ause the recorded data exhibit load NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A10 spikes in excess of the apparent base load. Furthermore, the circuit load on logger A was so minimal that it represented an insignificant amount of the...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program by reviewing load data and identifying discrepancies in the M&V analysis, including rounding errors in connected load values and adjustments to operating hours. Peak demand savings were calculated using peak coincidence factors, with assumptions made for unmonitored areas.
(1) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A14 where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh...
AI summary The evaluation discusses the energy savings from a lighting retrofit in a commercial and industrial (C&I) custom program. It includes equations for calculating direct savings and interactive cooling savings, noting reduced waste heat and lower cooling costs. Data from loggers and pivot tables were used to verify operating hours and savings claims.
ghting savings [kWh] = Heat gain factor (fraction of the lighting energy assumed to become a load on the space) = Seasonality factor (fraction of the year assumed to require cooling) = Coefficient of performance of the cooling system. A he...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from lighting efficiency improvements in commercial and industrial settings. It discusses factors such as heat gain, cooling seasonality, and coefficient of performance, and how they affect cooling and heating loads. It also mentions peak demand savings and the impact of interactive refrigeration and heating effects.
ve heating penalties were generated for this project. Electric resistance heating exists in offices and some equipment spaces. Some areas are heated by infrared radiant system. These units operate by NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Progr...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows that annual energy savings were 104.7% of the tracking savings, with changes in fixture counts and types contributing additional savings. Heating penalties were reduced significantly due to the elimination of interactions in spaces heated by radiant heat or fuel oil. Cooling savings were adjusted based on corrected COP values, and peak demand savings were higher than expected due to fixture and equipment changes.
er holds parties, weddings, remembrance services, seminars, and other events. A typical weekend event runs from 4 PM on Saturday to 1 AM on Sunday. The civic center is generally unoccupied on Sundays. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The project involved three energy-saving measures: occupancy sensors in washrooms and the fire hall, high-efficiency ground source heat pumps, and increased insulation. Savings were recalculated using updated energy models, showing 1.6% more gross evaluated energy savings than tracking savings.
rgy savings. In long form, insulation energy savings were calculated with the following equation: (1) where, = Insulation Energy Savings [kWh] = Month = Baseline building monthly cooling loads [kBtu] = Baseline building monthly heating loa...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings from insulation and HVAC measures using specific equations. Insulation savings are calculated by comparing baseline and installed building loads, while HVAC savings are determined by adjusting equipment efficiencies and comparing energy consumption between baseline and installed cases.
(2) where, = HVAC Energy Savings [kWh] = Month = Baseline building monthly cooling loads [kBtu] = Baseline building monthly heating loads [kBtu] = Energy Efficiency Rating of baseline cooling equipment (8.5) [kBtu/kWh] = Heating Coefficien...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of HVAC energy savings from insulation and HVAC upgrades, highlighting that savings were calculated separately for each measure and that combined implementation reduced the net effect of each. A third calculation was performed to determine total energy savings from implementing both measures together.
king analysis. The primary culprit NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A26 was likely the use of lower wall and roofing R-values in the tracking baseline model than those proposed in the feasibility study. As documented previous...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that lower insulation R-values in the baseline model led to overestimation of energy savings. Lighting controls savings could not be assessed due to an unknown calculation method, and peak demand savings were only 13% of projections due to low occupancy during peak hours.
d period. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A27 Project ID: C-276-166-9 1.0 Facility Overview Changes in refrigeration controls and operation were implemented in 19 convenience stores in this project. These are small individua...
AI summary This document evaluates energy savings from refrigeration control upgrades in 19 convenience stores. New controls regulate evaporator fans and anti-condensate heaters based on temperature and humidity. Outside air dampers were also installed in 10 locations to reduce compressor use. Savings are calculated with a 7.1% scale factor for transmission and distribution losses.
1 1 1 2.5 Condenser Fan 240 2.2 1 1 2 Door Heaters 120 8 1 1 4 Dartmouth Fans or Equipment Volts Amps Phase # of Units Doors/Unit COP Evaporators 120 6 1 2 3 Compressor 240 30.7 1 1 1 2.5 Condenser Fan 240 3 1 1 2 Door Heaters 120 5.53 1 1...
AI summary The document presents technical data on equipment specifications for evaporators, compressors, condenser fans, and door heaters in different locations, including voltage, amperage, and COP. It also notes the installation of evaporator fan and door humidity controls in all four locations and free cooling in Truro and Dartmouth.
4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were generated by vendor software. Savings for the evaporator fan controls, outside air free cooling, and condensate heater controls are calculated individually and results summ...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating energy savings from various HVAC controls, including evaporator fan controls, outside air free cooling, and condensate heater controls. Calculations involve fixed reductions in power usage and operational hours, with specific assumptions and factors applied to estimate savings for each site.
ng processes typically run 24 hours per day and 6 days per week during their peak season of May to October. During off peak months, the manufacturing schedule drops to 8 hours a day for 5 days a week. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document details energy savings from a lighting retrofit project completed in 2009 and 2010 at a facility that operates 24/7 during peak season. Savings were recalculated after a site visit, with 76% of the 2010 savings attributed to the project. Generator savings include a 6.1% scale factor for transmission and distribution losses, and evaluated energy savings were 3.0% less than tracking savings.
50.9 79.7 28.8 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A33 3.0 Project Overview Table 2 below provides an overview of the fixtures installed, as well as the baseline fixtures that were removed: Table 2: Summary of Installed and Remo...
AI summary This section provides a summary of installed and removed fixtures as part of the 2010 C&I Custom Program evaluation. It includes details on the types and quantities of new fixtures installed and the preexisting fixtures removed.
148 4' 1L T-12 92 4' 1L T828 72 Note that these fixture quantities reflect slight changes to the counts made during the evaluation. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet based app...
AI summary The document details the calculation of tracking savings from a lighting retrofit project. Savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach, breaking down fixtures by type and location, and using formulas to estimate annual energy savings based on wattage differences and operating hours.
culate annual run hours. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A34 Interactive cooling savings were also claimed for space conditioned areas of the facility. Since the new fixtures operate at lower wattages, and thus impart less h...
AI summary The document evaluates energy and demand savings from the 2010 C&I Custom Program, including interactive cooling savings and peak demand savings. Calculations use factors like heat gain, seasonality, and coincidence, while adjusting for prior savings claimed in 2009.
151 23W CFLs 4 2x14W CFLs 14 2.4W LED Fixtures Note that these fixture quantities reflect slight changes to the counts made during the evaluation. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were calculated using a...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit project, including the use of different light fixtures and the methodology for tracking savings. It also mentions the impact of lower wattage fixtures on heating and cooling loads, with equations provided for calculating these effects.
ve cooling savings in the summer months. The heating penalty and cooling bonus were calculated with the following equation: (2) where, NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A40 = Interactive Effects Savings [kWh] = Direct lighting...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects savings, direct lighting savings, and factors related to cooling and heating seasons, including heat gain factors, seasonality factors, and the coefficient of performance for cooling systems.
In one area, the retrofits were found to be incomplete. According to the site contact, the gallery was retrofitted with 31 CFLs as proposed, but then returned to the original state at the request of students who thought the new lights prod...
AI summary The retrofitting of lighting fixtures in a college was found to be incomplete in one area due to student feedback. Lighting logger data was used to estimate savings, but only two loggers were installed, limiting the ability to adjust peak demand savings calculations. Adjustments were made to fixture counts and the peak demand calculation method.
g database. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A43 Project ID: C-348218-2 1.0 Facility Overview This lighting project was installed across eight different buildings in three locations. These were air maintenance facilities and...
AI summary This document evaluates a 2010 lighting retrofit project across eight buildings in three locations, focusing on energy and demand savings. An extensive retrofit was completed, with savings recalculated based on site visits and program documentation. Evaluated energy savings were 19.6% less than the tracking savings.
8 188 90 Area 5 FB 6L T5HO 83 351 Area 6 FB 6L T-5HO 61 351 Area 7 1L 4' T-8 6 23 Area 7 2L 4' T-8 77 42 Area 7 2L T-8 HBF 60 76 Area 7 4L 8' T-8 482 90 Total 3,163 98.9 Avg/Fixt NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A45 Table 3:...
AI summary The text presents a table summarizing the removal of fixtures as part of an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It lists various areas, fixture types, quantities removed, and average fixture values, concluding with a total of 3,163 fixtures removed with an average value of 98.9 per fixture.
96 160 Area 5 1000W MH 77 1,075 Area 5 175W Wall Pks 44 205 Area 5 1L 4' T-12 71 50 Area 5 2L 4' T-12 902 80 Area 5 2L 8' T-12 12 137 Area 5 400W MH 6 450 Area 5 4L 4' T-12 132 160 Area 6 400W MH 450 61 Area 7 1L 4' T-12 6 50 Area 7 2L 4'...
AI summary The document lists various lighting fixtures and their quantities in different areas, noting that pre-existing fixtures were taken at face value due to unavailability for verification. The quantities reflect on-site inventories, and replacements at a remote maintenance location are included in tracking savings.
te visit and those fixtures are not NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A46 included in the lighting summary. Site personnel could not confirm the installation matches tracking estimates at that site. Fixture tables do not inclu...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program indicates that the installed lighting fixtures do not fully match tracking estimates, with some original baseline fixtures still in use. The majority of the installed fixtures are T8 lamps and ballasts, while T5 equipment accounts for a smaller portion.
ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh to kWh conversion factor Logger information and trend logs we...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from lighting retrofits, including direct savings calculations based on fixture wattage, usage hours, and conversion factors. It also mentions interactive cooling savings due to reduced waste heat and lower air conditioning loads. Logger data was used to verify operating hours, though some data was unclear or inconsistent.
es heating costs. Air conditioning loads are reduced resulting in lower cooling costs. The new lighting systems provide additional refrigeration savings for the entire year. The cooling bonus was calculated with the following equation: (2)...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings from lighting system upgrades, including interactive effects savings, cooling bonuses, and peak demand savings. It explains the use of factors such as heat gain, seasonality, and coefficient of performance to estimate savings. Adjustments are made for non-representative fixture usage and seasonal variations.
xtures according to general usage along with the fixture type. Annual lighting operation was also obtained for each location. The savings re-creation spreadsheet was populated from the collected data. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The document discusses on-site observations and findings related to lighting fixtures, noting discrepancies between inventory data and tracking documentation. Variations in fixture quantities and installed technologies contributed to reduced annual savings. Some differences may be due to access issues, labeling inconsistencies, and terminology differences.
d 6. These fixtures are located in NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A49 support/service areas. They are not included in the high-bay work area circuits and do not operate 8760 hour per year. Interactive heating and cooling ef...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program discusses energy savings and demand reductions. Annual energy savings were 80.4% of tracking estimates, with reductions due to changes in fixture counts and technology. Peak demand savings were 91.6% of tracking estimates. The facility described is a multistory office building in Halifax.
ly. The office coincidence factor was also applied to all remaining lights in the building since their operating patterns are more likely to follow the office schedules than the emergency schedule. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program, including the use of an office coincidence factor for lighting and a method to calculate demand savings from interactive effects with HVAC systems. The interactive effects demand savings formula accounts for factors like heat gain, seasonality, and system efficiency.
llow a more weekday schedule of roughly 8 am to 5 pm. Heating is provided by #2 oil. Direct expansion cooling equipment provides space cooling. Ammonia chillers are used for refrigeration at the site. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document describes an energy efficiency project at a facility that included a lighting retrofit across various areas, resulting in energy and demand savings. The savings were recalculated and verified, showing a 13.6% increase in evaluated energy savings compared to tracking savings.
lamp T8 equipment. These new units provide quicker re-strike in these large areas as well as energy savings. The remaining T8 equipment was installed in the offices, lunch room, and mechanical spaces. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...
AI summary The document discusses the installation of new T8 lighting equipment in large areas and offices, resulting in quicker re-strike and energy savings. Tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach, grouping lights by fixture type and location. Savings were calculated based on the difference between pre- and post-retrofit wattage, multiplied by annual operating hours.
6L T5 250 6L T5 245 Total 334 Total 356 Difference 22 There was also a small variation in equipment type installed. Six-lamp T8 fixtures were observed in production and dry storage areas. These fixtures did not exist prior to the project....
AI summary The text discusses variations in lighting equipment installed, including 6-lamp T5 fixtures with differing wattage values, and notes potential labeling issues. It also mentions the evaluation of cooling and refrigeration equipment, noting differences in COP values for various refrigeration systems.
efrigeration plant and extensive low temperature loads. Loads in freezers are continuous and year round. A 1.56 COP was assigned to low temperature freezers and a 1.72 COP for all other refrigeration. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation discusses energy savings from a refrigeration system upgrade, highlighting increased annual energy savings due to changes in COP values and fixture additions. It also outlines peak demand savings and the impact of generator demand savings from cooling interactions.
at gain factors exists. Nonetheless, NSPI used this approach in all of their lighting savings calculations, so it is was left unchanged in the ensuing evaluation analysis for the sake of consistency. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Progr...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program discusses the methodology used to calculate energy savings, including seasonality factors, lighting runtime reductions, and peak demand savings using a coincidence factor. These calculations were applied consistently with NSPI's approach to ensure uniformity in the analysis.
6.0 On-site Observations and Findings In general, the fixture counts verified on-site matched the counts specified in the tracking savings spreadsheet. There was however one major exception. In the tracking analysis, fixture counts for the...
AI summary On-site verification found that fixture counts in the banquet room were double-counted in the tracking analysis. The facility manager identified overestimations in lighting operating schedules. Adjustments were made to energy savings calculations using verified fixture counts and corrected operating schedules. Peak demand savings calculations were also revised to use independent coincidence factors for each lighting group.
ingle peak coincidence factor based on the savings weighted average operating schedule of the affected lights, peak coincidence factors were independently calculated for each affected lighting group. For a given lighting group, peak coinci...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of peak coincidence factors for lighting groups based on daily operating hours and introduces a new method for calculating demand savings from interactive effects with building HVAC systems. The rules for determining peak coincidence factors are outlined, along with the formula for calculating interactive effects demand savings.
(2) where, = Installed Motor Power Factor = Installed Motor Nameplate Horsepower [HP] = Installed Motor Nameplate Efficiency NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A69 = Phase-to-Phase Conversion Factor = Preexisting Motor Phase-to...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of power draw for preexisting and installed motors in the context of energy efficiency programs. It highlights the use of the preexisting motor's nameplate amperage and power factor in calculations, despite the installed motor having a higher efficiency, and raises questions about the methodology used.
(5) where, = Installed Motor Energy Savings [kWh] = Preexisting Motor Power Draw [kW] = Installed Motor Power Draw [kW] = Annual Operating Hours [h] The operating hours, h, used in Equation 5 were calculated based on the percentage of the...
AI summary The document discusses issues with the methodology used to calculate energy and demand savings from a motor efficiency project. Key problems include incorrect power factor calculations, reliance on a small sample of operating data, and failure to account for variations in motor usage. These issues were later addressed in the evaluation analysis.
95.8 150 96.2 0.4 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A73 Notice that in all cases but one (Item 13), the specifications of the installed motors met or exceed the specifications claimed in the tracking analysis. In addition to g...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program notes that motor specifications met or exceeded claims, with revised operating hour data collected for evaluation. The data was used for analysis and is summarized in Table 4.
Table 4 fed directly into the evaluation analysis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A74
AI summary The document presents a page from the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, which is part of a regulatory proceeding. The content includes a table (Table 4) that directly fed into the evaluation analysis.
96.2 88.5 40 Not Logged NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A75 Using the data collected on-site, a revised analysis methodology was employed to correct for the errors in the tracking analysis. For the 34 motors where roughly on...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program involved correcting errors in tracking analysis by using post-installation amperage data for 34 motors. Two calculation methodologies were employed depending on the availability of data, with equations provided for both scenarios.
tt to kW Conversion Factor [W/kW] NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A76 = Installed Motor Nominal Efficiency = Preexisting Motor Nominal Efficiency = Weekly Operating Hours [h] = Annual Schedule Scale Factor In cases where bot...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on the methodology used to calculate motor efficiency savings. It highlights the challenges of comparing pre- and post-installation amperage data due to shifts in motor loads and explains the use of Equation 6 and 7 for calculating savings based on available data.
s (net positive effect on savings) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A77 Adjustments to the operating hours of the installed motors based on facility data (net negative effect on savings) Usage of post-implementation met...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that adjustments to motor operating hours and the use of post-implementation metered data had a net negative and indeterminate effect on energy savings, respectively. Peak demand savings were 71.5% of the tracking estimate due to differences in the application of coincidence factors.
0 0 0 0 1 1 0 -4 Intersection 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection 10 0 1 1 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 Intersection 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In general, the discrepancies were relatively minor and were not all biased in the same direction. However, it...
AI summary The document discusses discrepancies in fixture counts at intersections, noting that while most were minor, seven out of 11 verified intersections had errors. The use of incorrect operating factors in the M&V analysis, particularly regarding protected left turns, affected energy savings calculations.
% 62.875% LED Pedestrian Countdown 16.500% 24.750% Incandescent Pedestrian 91.750% 87.625% Notice in Table 6 that the ―Incandescent Pedestrian‖ operating factor is equivalent to the sum of the LED pedestrian ―Walk‖ and ―Don‘t Walk‖ factors...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings from retrofitting pedestrian signals with LED technology. It explains how operating factors were developed and used to calculate energy savings for both protected and permissive intersections. Peak demand savings are calculated differently, using a simplified methodology based on annual energy savings divided by 8,760 hours.
n‘t know/Don‘t recall NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C10 IMPLEMENTED MEASURES Q21A1. FOR EACH Q21=1 (except scoping, feasibility or technical assessments): Did you implement this energy efficient upgrade through a Nova Scot...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions related to the implementation of energy-efficient upgrades through Nova Scotia Power programs, including whether the upgrade was implemented through a program, the reason if not, the implementation date, and estimated energy savings in 2010.
OR $ _ (88888=Measure uses fuel other than electricity: What fuel is that? _ IF NON-ELECTRIC FUEL (88888) SKIP TO NEXT MEASURE IN Q21=1.) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C11 Q21A5. (IF Q21A4 ≠ 88888): And how many kilowatt h...
AI summary The text outlines a questionnaire for evaluating energy efficiency measures, including questions about expected electricity savings and whether energy-efficient upgrades will be implemented through Nova Scotia Power programs. It also asks about the reasons for not participating in such programs and the expected timeline for implementation.
3. (Too little incentive) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C14 4. (Too much work required to obtain funding) 5. (Too little information about the program) 6. (Cost savings not worth the effort of applying) 7. (Approval takes...
AI summary The document presents a survey with questions about barriers to participation in a commercial and industrial energy efficiency program, including issues such as insufficient incentives, excessive effort required to obtain funding, and lack of information. It also asks about the importance of energy usage reduction and energy cost management to the organization.
ts to your company / organization? [9=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] 29. What percent of your annual operating budget do energy costs account for? [999=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] % 30. Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the Commercial a...
AI summary The text includes survey questions for organizations regarding energy costs and program improvements, with a reference to an evaluation of the 2010 Commercial and Industrial Custom Program by NMR.
l? b. To what do you trace the difficulties you encountered? How might they be addressed in future programs? 7. Since last year there have been a few changes to the C&I program i. Assignment of an NSPI project owner, who manages projects c...
AI summary The text discusses changes to the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) Custom Program, including the assignment of an NSPI project owner, improved tools for savings calculations, simplified feasibility studies, and increased incentive levels. Questions are posed regarding the rationale behind these changes and their effectiveness.
t pose a barrier to participation in the C&I Custom program? [Probes: Assistance, availability, or interaction with program staff; requirements of any of the four-steps;] The BER program was designed to streamline the rebate process for C&...
AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebate (BER) program and its implementation by C&I customers, highlighting the simplicity of the BER compared to the C&I Custom program. It also explores participant experiences, identifying potential barriers and motivations for participation in energy efficiency programs.
cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at evaluating the experience of participants in NSPI rebate programs, focusing on barriers to participation, challenges in implementation, satisfaction levels, and gaps in program coverage. It also asks about the effectiveness of communication, rebate amounts, and measurement and verification processes.
5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures could...
AI summary The text asks respondents to consider energy-efficient equipment and upgrades implemented or pursued by their company in the past two years, including whether they were installed independently or through rebate programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010.
ent measures and processes; or the NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C26 savings could be from PLANNED OR END-OF-LIFE replacements and installations of higher efficiency rather than standard efficiency measures and processes....
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures and their impact on electricity savings, asking participants about the influence of programs like C&I Custom and BER on their decision to implement energy efficiency actions. It also includes questions about the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to organizations.
sts to your company / organization? [9=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] 32. What percent of your annual operating budget do energy costs account for? [999=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] % 33. Do you have any suggestions on how to improve any of the NSPI...
AI summary This document is a final report on the impact and process evaluation of the Small Business Direct Install Program 2010, submitted by NMR Group, Inc. and KEMA, Inc. to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes survey questions and findings related to energy costs and rebate programs.
PRODUCTS IN THE FUTURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 TABLE 3-17: BARRIERS TO PURSUING ADDITIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENT E...
AI summary The text outlines various tables and figures related to energy efficiency, including barriers to adopting energy-efficient equipment, energy costs as a percentage of operating budgets, and the importance of energy management. It also references the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program logic model.
is approach will provide the most confident estimate of impacts available at this time. We recommend that the evaluation of the 2011 program year be based upon on-sites with time of use metering. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Light...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program highlights energy and demand savings, with a total of 12,876 MWh in energy savings and 3,928.8 kW in demand savings tracked by the DSM Administrator. The use of a line loss factor of 1.074 provides an adjusted estimate of 13,829 MWh of tracked savings at the generator.
e use of a line loss factor of 1.074, consistent with that used by NSPI for the small business sector, provides an overall 2010 tracking estimate of 13,829 MWh of tracked savings at the generator. Table 2-1: Summary of SBLS 2010 Program Tr...
AI summary The document discusses the use of a line loss factor of 1.074 in calculating tracked energy savings for the Small Business Lighting Program (SBLS) in 2010, resulting in an estimated 13,829 MWh of savings. Tables provide monthly and annual data on demand and energy savings, as well as lighting technology installations in 2008 and 2010.
y similar between the two years. T8 fixtures represent the vast majority of activity in each year, with CFL and exit signs showing the greatest amount of activity among the remaining technologies. Table 2-2: Summary of SBLS 2008 and 2010 S...
AI summary The text summarizes the energy savings achieved by the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program in 2008 and 2010, highlighting the dominance of T8 fixtures in both years and the overall energy savings by lighting type.
: 99.6%, CFL: 85.2%, On-site visits New Hampshire4 NHEC, PSNH, Unitil, 2003 Exits: 102.5% with M&V New York5 NYSERDA Small Commercial On-site visits 94%, + 14% Precision Lighting, 2006 with M&V 1 http://www.ctsavesenergy.org/files/CT%20SBE...
AI summary The document presents evaluation data for the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, including metrics such as 99.6% and 85.2% for CFL usage, and references on-site visits and M&V (Monitoring and Evaluation) processes. It also cites reports from various states and organizations, including New Hampshire and New York.
To more fully assess the transferability of the 2008 SBLS results to the 2010 program year, the NMR Team spoke with program implementers to assess differences in program operations between the two program years. The SBLS program was confir...
AI summary The document discusses the transferability of the 2008 SBLS program results to the 2010 program year, noting that program operations are largely unchanged except for expanded availability province-wide. It highlights discrepancies in wattage assumptions between the tracking system and on-site measurements, which affected savings estimates in 2008 and are still used in 2010.
ulate savings were the same as those used in 2008. Given this consistency and the similarity in measure mix installed, we believe the transfer of the 2008 realization rate – which was driven primarily by wattage changes due to spot watts –...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program's energy and demand savings are evaluated using realization rates from 2008. The results show installed annual energy savings of 12,052 MWh at the meter and 12,944 MWh at the generator, with connected demand savings of 3,712.7 kW and 3,987.5 kW, respectively.
ings at Meter with Interaction 12,052 3,712.7 Annual Savings at Generator with Interaction 12,944 3,987.5 The 2008 coincident demand factors calculated at the hour ending 6PM were determined to be 44.1% at the meter. Utilizing this factor,...
AI summary This section discusses the energy and peak demand savings associated with the Small Business Lighting Program (SBLS) in 2010. It estimates energy savings at the meter and generator levels, as well as peak demand savings, using a coincident demand factor of 44.1%.
2 2 2 Already changing 2 out lights Reduce carbon 4 4 8 footprint Get experts to do 2 audit and installation Replace non-working 2 3 equipment To increase resale 2 value † Don‘t Know 6 18 17 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting S...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program shows that 88% of respondents faced no barriers to participation, similar to findings from 2008 and 2009. A small percentage of respondents reported barriers, with 12% in 2010 indicating challenges.
† SBLS program still in progress 15 5 Have not considered other measures 6 5 Switched to another utility 3 Installed other measures before program 3 Not aware of rebates for other measures 6 3 ϐ Other 7 †ϐ Don‘t know 3 18 NMR Evaluation of...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program is still in progress, with some respondents not considering other measures or being unaware of rebates. Energy costs accounted for an average of 12.1% of annual operating budgets in 2010, slightly higher than in 2009 but not significantly so.
d about the same as reported in 2008 (15.7%). Among 2010 respondents, energy costs accounted for less than 20% of the annual operating budget for nearly all of the 2009 respondents (87%). (Table 3-18) Table 3-18: Energy Costs as a Percent...
AI summary The text discusses the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs across different years (2008, 2009, 2010) and highlights the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs among respondents. Energy costs as a percent of the budget decreased over time, with most respondents considering energy cost management and reduction important to their businesses.
costs (96%) were important to their businesses; about one out of four respondents reported that reducing energy usage (75%) and managing energy costs (74%) were ‗very important‘ to them. (Table 3-19) Table 3-19: Importance of Energy Manage...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of energy management to businesses, highlighting that reducing energy usage and managing energy costs were very important to a large percentage of respondents. It also outlines the payback requirements for energy efficiency measures, with most businesses requiring a payback period of less than two years.