Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M03669

The 2010 DSM savings results and ENSC's startup activities were achieved with an expenditure of $22.71 million. This is based on financial information from NSPI for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, combined with unaudited financia...

AI summary The 2010 DSM savings results and ENSC's startup activities were achieved with an expenditure of $22.71 million, based on financial information from NSPI and unaudited information from ENSC for 2010.

The 2010 expenditures include $1.55 million in startup costs for ENSC to set up the organization, transition responsibility and operations from NSPI and develop the 2012 DSM Plan. The startup budget approved by the UARB in June 2010 was $2...

AI summary The 2010 expenditures for ENSC included $1.55 million for startup costs, including transitioning operations from NSPI and developing the 2012 DSM Plan. The UARB approved a $2.04 million startup budget for expenditures in 2010 and 2011.

5. 2012 DSM PLAN SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT The savings and associated investment to meet the 2012 annual and cumulative IRP targets are presented in Figure 5.1. For 2012, ENSC forecasts annual energy and demand savings of 233.6 GWh and 44.0 M...

AI summary The 2012 DSM Plan forecasts energy savings of 233.6 GWh and demand savings of 44.0 MW annually, exceeding IRP targets while keeping investment at $43.7 million—below the IRP's $61 million program cost. Cumulative savings also surpass IRP goals. ENSC plans to refine programs in 2011-2012 with stakeholder input.

Figure 5.1 2012 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2012 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource Cos...

AI summary Figure 5.1 presents the 2012 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, showing investments and benefits across various programs, including residential, commercial, and industrial initiatives. The table details investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests for different DSM programs in Nova Scotia.

DATE FILED: February 28, 2011 & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits and cost-benefit ratios for energy efficiency programs, including net present value of avoided costs and the TRC and PAC ratios, with a note on participation by low-income households.

Education and Outreach: The Plan includes continued investment to communicate the benefits of DSM to increase awareness of, and participation in, DSM programs. Development and Research: ENSC continues to gather information about markets an...

AI summary The Plan emphasizes continued investment in education and outreach for DSM programs, development and research into new energy-saving opportunities, innovative financing strategies, and support for advanced building energy codes and labelling policies in Nova Scotia.

1.1 2012 DSM Budget and Savings Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) consulted stakeholders and worked with Navigant Consulting Inc. and Dunsky Energy Consulting in designing the 2012 DSM Plan. The proposed plan is a comprehensive por...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) designed the 2012 DSM Plan with stakeholder input and consulting firms. The plan includes residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional programs aimed at meeting energy and demand savings targets from the 2009 Integrated Resource Plan. ENSC plans to invest $43.7 million in 2012, targeting 233.6 GWh and 44.0 MW of savings.

OVERACHIEVEMENTS F 2012 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a DDSM PLANS Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Pro...

AI summary The table outlines overachievements from DSM programs in Nova Scotia, including investment, lifetime benefits, and energy savings. It details various programs such as efficient products, home energy reports, and commercial and industrial initiatives, along with their associated costs and benefits.

b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENSC's and participants' costs. & lt;sup>c PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to ENSC's costs. & lt;sup>d Includes participation by low-income hou...

AI summary The text defines TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios used in evaluating programs, with TRC considering both ENSC and participants' costs, while PAC focuses only on ENSC's costs. It also notes that participation includes low-income households.

4.7 Renewable Heating Strategy The objective of the Renewable Heating strategy is to create a broad renewable/advanced heating strategy for the province. The strategy will be designed to reduce electric space and domestic water heating loa...

AI summary The Renewable Heating Strategy aims to reduce electric heating loads and greenhouse gas emissions by promoting renewable heating technologies such as wood pellets, solar hot water heating, and ground source heat pumps. ENSC will collaborate with stakeholders to develop regulatory frameworks and seek funding partnerships to support local economic development and infrastructure.

Preliminary Program Cost Allocation Line # TABLE 1 Allocation of 25% of program costs associated with system benefits. 29 Bowater Mersey (AE only) 4 42,857 0.7% $23,912 182,570 1.5% $108,691 1.2% $132,603 30 31 Gen. Repl./ Load Foll. Whole...

AI summary This table outlines the preliminary allocation of 25% of program costs associated with system benefits across different entities and categories. It includes cost allocations for Bowater Mersey, general replacement and load follow, wholesale market backup/top-up, and 1P-RTP.

whether and to what extent non-program savings can be counted toward the goals. Note: Alternative curves are for illustrative purposes only. C. Program Costs. The IRP forecast includes annual DSM budgets, which to date have been mirrored i...

AI summary The text discusses challenges in meeting provincial DSM targets, including the need for clarity on the roles of program and non-program activities, potential higher unit costs for voluntary programs, and the need to revisit the IRP's ramp-up forecast. It also suggests the importance of low-cost policy tools and performance-based contracts.

ENSC Electricity DSM Review Program / Scope of POTENTIA L SAVINGS PRINCIPAL RECOMMENDATIONS Financing Policy Major New Initiative Expand on-bill financing to residential Transferable financing (on-bill or PACE) Building Labelling Policy Ma...

AI summary The ENSC Electricity DSM Review outlines several major new initiatives and recommendations, including expanding on-bill financing, supporting building labelling policies, exploring code compliance, developing training programs, creating a renewable heating strategy, and leveraging government partnerships to drive energy efficiency and sustainability efforts.

MEASURE-LEVEL CONSTRAINTS Despite the valuable information a TRC analysis may provide, this requirement would unduly restrain ENSC's ability to forge an optimal path forward. Indeed, as with any diversified business, different products can...

AI summary The text argues against requiring a measure-level Total Resource Cost (TRC) analysis for energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the need for flexibility in program design. It highlights that some programs may have a TRC ratio below one but are still valuable for broader strategic reasons, such as brand building or equity considerations. The text references a UARB decision from 2009 that allows certain low TRC activities if critical to the overall program.

HARMONIZING ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC INITIATIVES Throughout Canada and the U.S., efficient and effective DSM program delivery is often challenged by the existence of a patchwork of DSM administrators. In some regions, for example, a varie...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges of managing multiple demand-side management (DSM) programs across different utilities and agencies, and how the creation of ENSC offers an opportunity to streamline these efforts. Coordination between the UARB and government is suggested to reduce duplication and improve efficiency.

5. Forecast Program Costs ($ per 1st-yr kWh) 17 WWW.DUNSKY.CA PAGE 23 17 Nominal dollars, not adjusted for currencies. The comparison in Table 4 indicates that ENSC's forecast budgets are on par with Vermont but below those for more aggres...

AI summary The text compares ENSC's forecast program costs with those of other states, noting that ENSC's costs are expected to be higher due to ambitious savings targets and reliance on more expensive programs, with projected costs ranging from $0.35 to $0.45 per kWh for 2011-2013.

This is further borne out by a program-level comparison of ENSC's 2011 program costs with those of similar programs for Massachusetts and Vermont, presented below. Program ENSC 2011 Mass. 2011 Vermont 2011 Efficient Products $0.21 $0.24 $0...

AI summary The document compares ENSC's 2011 program costs with those of Massachusetts and Vermont, showing that Nova Scotia's costs are lower, except for Vermont's low-cost residential lighting program. This suggests a need to increase voluntary program cost forecasts in Nova Scotia.

EXISTING PROGRAMS – COMMERCIAL, INSTITUTIONAL & INDUSTRIAL Even more than is the case for residential programs, ENSC's suite of commercial & industrial (C&I) programs can serve as a good basis for expansion. The small business direct insta...

AI summary The document discusses opportunities for expanding ENSC's commercial and industrial energy efficiency programs. It highlights the potential of existing programs like the small business direct install and prescriptive products initiatives, and suggests a targeted submarket approach, long-term customer relationships, and leveraging data for better program effectiveness. It also notes challenges in meeting ambitious DSM targets within a short timeframe.

EXISTING PROGRAMS – ENABLING STRATEGIES ENSC has inherited an existing Education & Outreach program and a Development & Research program. Both are important, and we suggest that D&R in particular could be expanded to foster longer-term sav...

AI summary ENSC has inherited existing programs and proposes expanding the Development & Research program to support long-term savings. ENSC can lead initiatives in financing, codes, building labeling, and renewable heating to achieve DSM targets and stimulate economic opportunities. These efforts will have limited impact before 2013 but must start now.

PERFORMANCE PLUS (NEW HOMES) OVERVIEW: Conserve Nova Scotia has just launched (Sept 2010) a revamped new construction program due to recent (December 2009) changes in building code (performance path requiring Energuide 80, prescriptive pat...

AI summary Conserve Nova Scotia launched the Performance Plus (New Homes) program in September 2010 to encourage energy-efficient construction in response to updated building codes. The program includes subsidized Energuide assessments, prescriptive rebates, and incentives for solar-ready and solar thermal installations, with a cap of 1,200 homes. The program requires air or hydronic heating systems, excluding electric resistance heating, which is seen as inefficient and limits future fuel switching options.

- Develop appliance replacement program into full-scale, long term program. Full-scale appliance replacement programs can typically reach 2-3% of all households per year – equivalent to 8,000-13,000 units/year (principally refrigerators) i...

AI summary The text discusses strategies for expanding and improving energy efficiency programs, including full-scale appliance replacement, upstream product strategies with manufacturers, leveraging regional alliances, targeting midstream market actors, and implementing year-round product incentives to increase participation and reduce energy consumption.

the province is expected in 2012, with regulation expected in 2012-2013 to eliminate Class 8 product from the market mix. The SLC program will likely continue until these regulations come into effect. Targets for this sector in 2011, at 32...

AI summary The BER program provides prescriptive incentives for energy efficiency measures, but its effectiveness is yet to be determined. Suggestions include distinguishing between market-driven and discretionary opportunities and using tailored incentives for specific market segments. ENSC administers the program as part of its Efficient Products initiative.

SMALL BUSINESS LIGHTING SOLUTIONS (SMALL BUSINESS EXISTING) OVERVIEW: The Direct Install Program for Small Businesses offers lighting retrofits via third party implementation contractors. Eligibility requires <100,000 kWh/year and <100kW a...

AI summary The Small Business Lighting Solutions program provides lighting retrofits for small businesses with incentives covering 80% of costs. It has achieved significant energy savings and is on track to exceed 2010 targets. The program is recommended for expansion in eligibility and measure options to increase savings and scale beyond 2011 levels.

A Note on Savings Attribution from Enabling Strategies The suite of policy options we set out below have the potential to generate substantial electric savings in the mid to long term. As discussed earlier, determining the savings impact a...

AI summary The document discusses the challenges of savings attribution for enabling strategies and policy options, noting that ENSC is well-positioned to advance these initiatives. It suggests adopting Vermont's approach of separating non-resource acquisition budgets from resource acquisition budgets. The text also mentions the potential for utilities to support improvements to building codes, even though this is a governmental responsibility.

DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH OVERVIEW: Development and Research (D&R) efforts in the current DSM Plan encompass market assessments, technology reviews, staff development, baseline studies and demonstration projects. To date, a substantial port...

AI summary The Development and Research (D&R) section of the DSM Plan includes market assessments, technology reviews, and pilot programs. The 2011 budget funds a residential fuel substitution pilot. ENSC is advised to consider broader D&R definitions, including experimental program designs and emerging technologies like cold-climate heat pumps. D&R activities may support long-term DSM targets by replenishing savings opportunities.

REGIONS With the exception of wood and pellet stoves, we anticipate relatively low uptake for most measures in the program, with one of the primary risks of the pilot being a lack of sufficient participants. For this reason, most measures...

AI summary The document discusses the anticipated low uptake of most program measures, except for wood and pellet stoves, which are expected to have high demand. Due to potential budget overruns, incentives for these stoves should be limited to specific regions: Cape Breton and Queens Regional Municipalities, covering about 12% of the population, to test uptake in both rural and urban areas.

NON-INCENTIVE BUDGET The budget below provides our estimate of likely administrative and implementation costs, including evaluation costs, for the pilot program.

AI summary The document outlines the estimated administrative and implementation costs, including evaluation costs, for a pilot program under the Non-Incentive Budget section.

17 Non-Incentive Budget Element Cost Notes Program Development $32,500 0.15 ENSC FTEs: developing incentive forms, etc. Program Administration $130,000 1 ENSC FTE: participant intake, installer outreach, budget tracking, media outreach, or...

AI summary The Non-Incentive Budget outlines various program costs, including program development, administration, marketing, baseline home verification, and evaluation. These costs are primarily managed by ENSC and third-party providers.

18 Measure Uptake Forecasts Measure Incented Units NTG Total Incentive Spending Wood stoves 100 63% $80,000 Pellet stoves 50 25% $48,000 Wood boilers/furnaces ECH 70 60% $175,000 Wood boilers/furnaces EBB 5 33% $36,000 Gas boilers/furnaces...

AI summary The document outlines forecasts for the uptake of various energy efficiency measures, including wood and pellet stoves, boilers, and furnaces. It provides data on incentivized units, participation rates, and total incentive spending. The forecasts are based on survey results and assumptions about participation rates during the pilot period.

ANTICIPATED RESULTS The table below presents our forecast of program costs and benefits, based on the non-incentive budget presented on page [45 a](#page-221-0)nd the uptake rates presented above.

AI summary The document presents a forecast of program costs and benefits based on the non-incentive budget and uptake rates outlined in the proceeding.

PHASE 2: Transportation (Proposed to Introduce in Year 3) Transportation is the second largest emitter of Greenhouse Gases in Nova Scotia (at 13% of total GHGs), and is promoted as the second priority of Green Schools Environment Improveme...

AI summary Phase 2 of the transportation initiative, proposed for Year 3, aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by promoting sustainable transportation practices in schools. Green Schools Nova Scotia (GSNS) plans to implement a 'Smart Driver for School Bus' program, including vehicle upgrades, improved maintenance, and better driving practices, as well as initiatives like carpooling, anti-idling, and active transportation options.

s had been responsible for specifying the reach with customers. Contractors and design professionals measures that were installed through the BER program. In addition, represent channels that may be effectively utilized to promote the seve...

AI summary The BER program was primarily motivated by financial benefits such as energy savings and program incentives. Contractors and design professionals were key in specifying installed measures. The evaluation highlights the importance of emphasizing energy and bill savings in promoting participation.

Program Finding Recommendation Business BER-F4. BER-R4. Energy The BER program was designed to be a streamlined prescriptive The BER should continue to work with customers to avoid creating Rebate program. Not surprisingly, nearly all the...

AI summary The BER program is largely successful with minimal barriers to participation and high customer satisfaction. However, there are recommendations to improve customer service and responsiveness as the program scales up, and to ensure complex cases are escalated to the C&I Custom program.

rior to the BER program and relatively few respondents reported and reduce costs. taking any additional energy efficient actions after participating in the program.

AI summary The text discusses the BER program and notes that prior to its implementation, few respondents took additional energy-efficient actions after participating in the program, suggesting potential limitations in the program's effectiveness in encouraging further energy efficiency measures.

L-F5. PD:CFL-R5. Anticipating having to drop regular CFLs from its lineup of rebated The program should evaluate the opportunities for rebating LEDs energy efficiency products, the PD program has sought other energy (other than Christmas l...

AI summary The PD program is considering replacing rebated CFLs with other energy efficiency products, particularly LEDs, as LED technology matures. The NMR recommends a socket saturation study in 2011 to assess the market stage for energy-efficient lighting.

d savings estimates can be found in Table 1. All savings presented are at the generator level (based on line losses of 11.88%) and the CFL savings include the impact of interactive effects of heating. Table 1: 2010 Program Energy Savings E...

AI summary The text presents 2010 program energy savings estimates, including gross and net savings at the generator level, with line losses of 11.88% factored in. The data includes savings from various energy efficiency measures such as CFLs, programmable thermostats, and ENERGY STAR appliances.

Findings and Recommendations for CFLs Findings Recommendations PD:CFL-F4. PD:CFL-R4. As the 2012 date for phase-out of incandescent bulbs gets closer, The PD program should consider offering an incandescent bounty there is likely to be som...

AI summary As the phase-out of incandescent bulbs approaches, the PD program anticipates consumer hoarding and is seeking alternative energy efficiency products to rebate, such as LEDs. The program has made progress in promoting CFLs and is recommended to conduct a socket saturation study to better understand lighting usage and diffusion rates.

1.3 APP: Program Description The Appliance Rebate portion (APP) of the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program began on October 1st 2010 and ran through the end of December 2010. The program was administered by the implementation contract...

AI summary The Appliance Rebate portion (APP) of the 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program aimed to achieve energy savings through rebates on ENERGY STAR appliances. Initially limited to chain retailers, the program was expanded to include independent retailers after protests. The program exceeded its targets, with over 4,000 appliances rebated, and was extended to December 2010.

etailers look for more opportunities to leverage energy efficiency programs and promote energy efficiency. Long-Term Outcomes  Improved availability of energy efficient appliances. Increased understanding of the benefits of energy efficie...

AI summary The document discusses long-term outcomes of energy efficiency programs, including increased availability of efficient appliances, standard practices among residential customers, and sustained energy savings. It also mentions the evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program, specifically the CFL component, and the use of a logic model and difference-in-differences approach to estimate energy savings.

y that existing household stocks and stocks remaining in storage in distribution channels will mean that incandescent bulbs will be available through the life of CFLs installed in the 2008 program.‖ NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Progra...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program under three scenarios, considering the implementation of new energy performance standards for general-service lamps in Nova Scotia, and how this affects the calculation of lifetime energy and demand savings from CFL installations.

Page 19 Using the equations below we determined that the indoor light fixtures rebated through the program resulted in demand savings of 70.1 kW. (Table 3-1) Table 3-1: Tracked and Evaluated Savings—ENERGY STAR Qualified Indoor Light Fixtu...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from indoor light fixtures rebated through a program, resulting in 70.1 kW of demand savings. Savings estimates are based on the OPA report, and secondary sources were not found for more accurate data on controls measures.

ggests that the tracked savings estimates remain the same. Between October and November of 2010, the PD program rebated 2,139 heavy duty timers resulting in program savings of 820,627 kWh. (Table 3-4) Table 3-4: Tracked and Evaluated Savin...

AI summary The text evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program's savings from rebated heavy duty timers and dimmer switches. It notes that savings from timers depend on user behavior and cites specific savings estimates for dimmer switches based on the OPA report.

assume that the current program savings assumption of 23.65 kWh per unit is reasonable. The PD program rebated a total of 3,781 dimmer switches, resulting in program savings of 89,421 kWh. (Table 3-5) Table 3-5: Tracked and Evaluated Savin...

AI summary The document discusses the energy savings achieved through the rebate of dimmer switches and power bars with integrated timers. It assumes a savings rate of 23.65 kWh per dimmer switch and 53.39 kWh per power bar, based on the OPA report. The program rebated 3,781 dimmer switches and 221 power bars, resulting in total savings of 89,421 kWh and 11,799 kWh, respectively.

221 12 13 12 13 0% timers Total 22,109 2,513 2,811 1,777 1,988 -29% We calculated the demand savings for controls by obtaining the ratio of all residential target peak demand savings to target energy savings for the Efficient Products—Reta...

AI summary The document calculates demand savings for various energy efficiency measures under the Efficient Products—Retail Program using data from the UARB Approved Settlement Agreement. Demand savings for ENERGY STAR qualified indoor light fixtures were found to be 70.1 kW, and total demand savings across all measures amounted to 420.4 kW.

and demand savings for the F&C components of the PD program in 2010. For the 2010 program year, the generator-level impacts are estimated at 1,071 MWh of energy savings and 225.7 kW of demand savings. Table 3-16: Fixture and Controls Energ...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, estimating energy and demand savings for fixture and controls components. It reports 1,071 MWh of energy savings and 225.7 kW of demand savings at the generator level for the program year, with detailed breakdowns in Table 3-16.

225.7 1,071 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 33 4 Impact Evaluation: Appliance Rebates The Power Down program (PD) Appliance Rebate (APP) component ran from October 1st, 2010 through the end of December 2010. The program prov...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program's Appliance Rebate component reviews savings assumptions using databases like CALMAC and CEE. Savings estimates are based on the Ontario Power Authority's 2010 report, which provides savings estimates for rebated products.

33 This study was sponsored by Nova Scotia Power. 34 This study was prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission CPUC and sponsored by California‘s Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs). NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power sponsored a study evaluating the 2010 Power Down Program, which included rebates for ENERGY STAR qualified refrigerators. The study reviewed reports from OPA and Mowris & Carlson, both of which estimated energy savings using similar methods. The OPA estimate was retained as it was deemed reasonable.

Familiar 65% Somewhat Familiar 34% Neither Familiar nor Unfamiliar 1% As shown in Table 6-3, nine out of ten retailers (90%) interviewed sold ENERGY STAR light fixtures and electronic baseboard thermostats in 2010. More than four out of fi...

AI summary The text presents survey results showing that most retailers sold ENERGY STAR products and offered rebates under the Power Down program in 2010. The data highlights high participation rates in selling rebated items such as light fixtures, dimmer switches, and timers.

that were rebated through the program in 2010. Some respondents had not worked at the store or in the department in 2009 and would not venture an estimate, which accounts for the smaller sample sizes. Table 7-3: Average Percent Rebated Pro...

AI summary The text discusses data on the average percent of rebated product sales for ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers during different periods in 2009 and 2010, highlighting variations between chain and independent retailers.

23% 23% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 86 The majority of chain retailers indicated that, concurrently with the program rebates, other rebates or promotions had also been offered on ENERGY STAR refrigerators (6 out of 8) an...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program indicates that many retailers offered additional rebates or promotions alongside the program's rebates for ENERGY STAR appliances. Rebate amounts varied significantly among retailers for both refrigerators and clothes washers.

le size 2 Decided not to 1 Too much work 1 The independent retailers were asked about their procedures for tracking the rebates. One-half of the independent retailers (3 out of 6) reported that they had tracked the rebates by hand; the rem...

AI summary The document discusses how independent retailers track rebates, with half using manual methods and the other half using computer systems or internal SKU numbers. It also notes that most respondents were satisfied with the Power Down program.

tter. Your responses will be kept strictly confidential—that is your name will not be associated with any of your responses. This survey will take about 15 minutes of your time. Would that be okay? [IF REFUSE, ASK ―Can we schedule a more c...

AI summary This survey assesses respondents' familiarity with the ENERGY STAR™ label and their awareness of purchasing ENERGY STAR™-qualified products, including CFLs, light fixtures, refrigerators, clothes washers, and heat pumps.

wer Down program period in December 2010 NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B28 than they were before Power Down program period, between January and September 2010. What percentage of that increase in sales do you attribut...

AI summary The document contains survey questions related to the impact of the Power Down program on ENERGY STAR light fixture sales. Retailers are asked about the percentage increase in sales attributed to the program and the expected duration of this effect, as well as the influence of the $15 rebate on sales during the promotion period.

that the percentage sales of indoor NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B37 light timers that qualified for the Power Down rebate was higher after the Power Down program period in December 2010 than they were before Power D...

AI summary This section of the document evaluates the impact of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program on the sales of indoor light timers. It asks retailers to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects are expected to last. It also inquires about the effect of the $3 rebate on sales during the October-November promotion period.

m promotion and rebates? % NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B43 C. [IF % SALES OF REBATED ELECTRONIC BASEBOARD THERMOSTATS ARE HIGHER IN DEC. 2010 (COL. C) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]: You just indicated that the per...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the impact of rebates on the sales of electronic baseboard thermostats. It asks respondents to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects are expected to last.

er during the October-November promotion period if the $5 Power Down program rebate had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; [998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] C. I want to make sure I understand you correctly when...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Power Down program rebate on the sales of electronic baseboard thermostats during the October-November promotion period. It includes questions about hypothetical sales without the rebate and asks if other rebates were offered on the same products during that time.

9. Don‘t know / Refused NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B55 I4. Is there someone else at this store who would be familiar with the stocking patterns or sales trends for the appliances that you sell? BACKGROUND 1. What i...

AI summary The text is a questionnaire assessing retailer participation in the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on appliance sales and rebate distribution. It includes questions about job roles, product availability, awareness of the program, and concerns about participation.

her? 4. Same [SKIP TO Q36A] 5. Lower 6. Higher [SKIP TO Q36A] 8. Refused [SKIP TO Q36A] 9. Don‘t know [SKIP TO Q36A] E. [IF Q35A 2 lower ]: By what percentage do you estimate your store‘s sales of these ENERGY STAR refrigerators would have...

AI summary This section of the document includes survey questions regarding the impact of the Power Down program rebate on the sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators during the November-December promotion period, and whether other rebates were provided on refrigerators during that time.

to fill-out a form to receive the rebate after the purchase? Now, I‘d like to ask you a few questions about how you processed and tracked the rebates/incentives as part of the program. 17. How did you track the rebates/incentives? [Excel s...

AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted to evaluate the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on rebate processing, tracking methods, submission procedures, and overall participant satisfaction with the program.

ould expect, the partial use factor was higher for equipment that was replaced than equipment that was not replaced. Most of the replacement refrigerators (93%) and freezers (86%) were new appliances. Table 3-9: Partial Use Factors and Rep...

AI summary The text discusses the adjustment of UECs based on partial use factors and equipment replacement, highlighting that new replacement appliances had higher partial use factors compared to used ones. Table 3-9 provides data on sample sizes, partial use factors, and the percentage of new and used replacement appliances for refrigerators and freezers.

Savings—Replacement Program Total Savings Meter Generator Energy Savings (MWh) 179 200 3.3.2 Evaluated Program Impacts Based on the program‘s tracking database, NMR determined that the program was replacing retired equipment with two diffe...

AI summary The Savings—Replacement Program replaced retired refrigerators with ENERGY STAR qualified models, resulting in significant energy savings. The program's energy savings were calculated using average annual consumption estimates, which were lower than those from other studies due to differences in the age and type of refrigerators replaced.

uld you have sold the refrigerators? NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program Page A6 1. Private party, such as a friend or family member 2. Used appliance dealer 3. Sold on an Internet site, such as Craig‘s List 4...

AI summary The text presents survey questions about how respondents disposed of old refrigerators and whether they could afford new ENERGY STAR refrigerators without incentives. Nova Scotia Power provided financial incentives and recycling services for refrigerator replacements.

MWh of energy savings and 2,174 kW of demand savings. These evaluated program savings substantially exceeded the program‘s goal of 4,930 MWh of energy savings and 1,410 kW of demand savings (Table 1). Table 1: 2010 Program Energy Savings P...

AI summary The 2010 Existing Houses Program achieved significant energy and demand savings, exceeding its goals. The evaluation highlights potential double counting of savings due to funding from multiple agencies, including Natural Resources Canada.

of optional upgrades. The data is also uploaded to NRCan for review and validation. Retrofit Activities After the pre-retrofit evaluation, homeowners have 18 months to complete any suggested upgrades and schedule a post-retrofit evaluation...

AI summary The document outlines the retrofit process for the 2010 Existing Houses Program, including pre- and post-retrofit evaluations, homeowner responsibilities, and rebate eligibility. Data is reviewed by NRCan, and the program is supported administratively by NRCan with quality assurance and training for advisors.

Table 1-1: EnerGuide Existing Houses Electric Incentives 2009 2010 Measure Incentive Incentive Houses with Electric Heating Systems High efficiency ductless air to air heat pumps with electric NA $750 backup High efficiency central (―ducte...

AI summary Table 1-1 outlines electric incentives for EnerGuide existing houses in 2009 and 2010, including incentives for heat pumps, thermal storage units, and thermostats. The table shows varying levels of financial support for different efficiency measures.

2.4 Prescriptive Savings As previously mentioned, the total program savings listed in the program‘s tracking spreadsheet were calculated by adding the prescriptive savings values listed in Table 2-2 to a per EnerGuide point savings estimat...

AI summary The document discusses the potential for double counting of energy savings in a program, particularly with measures modeled in HOT2000 and prescriptive savings. It outlines that only specific measures should have prescriptive savings applied to avoid double counting, while others are captured in a fixed energy consumption value per EnerGuide point increase.

2.5 2010 Program Impacts To calculate the impacts of the 2010 existing houses program, the NMR team applied the evaluated EnerGuide point savings value of 1,047 kWh, and the prescriptive savings values for drain water heat recovery measure...

AI summary The 2010 existing houses program's impacts were calculated using EnerGuide point savings values and prescriptive savings for specific measures. Adjustments were made based on the Ontario Power Authority's guidelines and the LIH program's 2009 impact evaluation, considering fuel switches and non-electric heating systems.

16, 2003 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 18 2.7 Energy Savings Estimation Table 2-11 presents the final estimates of savings for the EEH program including the impact of free- ridership. The evaluated energ...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program indicates that it exceeded its energy and demand savings goals. The program achieved 7,274 MWh of energy savings and 1,943 kW of demand savings, surpassing the 2010 DSM plan's targets of 4,930 MWh and 1,410 kW, respectively.

70 +9.6% NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 20 3.2 Program Goals and Design The 2010 EEH program had a target of 4,930 MWh of energy savings and 1,410 kW of demand savings. The 2010 EEH program was jointly sp...

AI summary The 2010 EEH program aimed for 4,930 MWh of energy savings and 1,410 kW of demand savings, jointly sponsored by the DSM Administrator, CNS, and NRCan. NRCan abruptly ended rebate support in March 2010, though they continue administrative support. The program's end date is March 31, 2011, with no confirmation of continuation or replacement.

he measures rebated by the program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 22 3.5 Program Tracking and Reporting Delivery Agents were responsible for using the HOT2000 software from NRCan to create audit reports...

AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program involved Delivery Agents using HOT2000 software from NRCan to create audit reports for the EEH program. Issues with information sharing between NRCan, CNS, and the DSM Administrator hindered data retrieval. Consolidation under ENSC may resolve these issues, but collaboration with NRCan is needed for effective data exchange.

6% NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 27 Table 3-8 shows measure uptake (installations as a percentage of recommendations), estimated annual energy savings, EEH program incentive amount, and cost per kWh of a...

AI summary This section evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, highlighting the Measure Effectiveness Index and Measure Opportunity Index derived from installation rates, energy savings, and incentive amounts. Electronic thermostats and high-efficiency heat pumps were identified as particularly effective measures.

Table 3-8: Effectiveness of Measures Per Unit Cost Annual per Energy Per Unit kWh of Measure Measure Savings EEH annual Effectiveness Uptake (kWh/yr) Incentive savings Index High efficiency air to air heat pump with 70% 7,208 $1,200 $0.17...

AI summary Table 3-8 evaluates the effectiveness of various energy efficiency measures, including high-efficiency heat pumps, thermostats, solar water heating, and insulation, based on energy savings, cost per unit, and cost per kWh of annual savings. The data shows varying levels of effectiveness for each measure, with some having higher energy savings but also higher costs.

water heater tank insulation) 10. (Yes, planned to install water heater exposed pipe insulation) 11. (NO) 12. (Don‘t know) 13. (Refused) FR2. Before your initial energy audit, had you contacted any contractors about any of the electric spa...

AI summary The document includes survey responses related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, including whether participants contacted contractors before an energy audit and their hypothetical actions without the program. It also asks about budget considerations for energy-efficient upgrades.

e incentive from Nova Scotia Power, could your budget have accommodated the full cost of the energy efficient upgrades including the incentive? 1. Yes 2. No 3. (Don‘t know) FR5. How influential were the following elements to your decision...

AI summary The text includes survey questions about the influence of program incentives, energy audits, and contractor services on participants' decisions to install energy efficiency upgrades through the EnerGuide Existing Houses program. It also references an evaluation of the 2010 program by Nova Scotia Power's evaluation team.

-5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Net Savings 2.6.2 The Regression Approach To try to obtain a more precise estimate of savings, the regression approach was implemented.11 Only a subset of the participants had tracki...

AI summary The regression approach was used to estimate savings from the 2010 Low Income Households Program. It assumed expected savings correlated with pre-participation consumption, using pre-NAC as a proxy. The analysis showed that participants with tracking data were not representative of the broader population, leading to higher variability in savings estimates.

Y-Hat NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households Program Page 16 2.6.3 Summary of 2009 Analysis Results Figure 2-4 shows a comparison of the savings estimates. Among the estimates based on billing analysis alone, the various procedures p...

AI summary The 2009 analysis of the Low Income Households Program compared various methods for estimating energy savings. The WLS regression model was determined to be the most accurate, yielding an estimate of 1,044 kWh per participant annually with a 90% confidence interval of 823 to 1,265 kWh.

Program Performance and Savings Finding Recommendation NH-F11. NH-R11. Only one of the four builders reported being satisfied with the The program should work to improve the scheduling and scheduling and timing of the audit. timing of the...

AI summary The document highlights issues with the scheduling of energy audits and the modeling of energy efficiency measures in the New Houses program. It recommends improvements in communication with builders and the proper handling of prescriptive savings in HOT2000 to avoid double counting and ensure accurate energy savings calculations.

2000program.html. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 8 Through the NH program, electrically heated houses receiving a final EnerGuide rating of 85 or higher were eligible for an additional incentive of $300. This increased substan...

AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program provided incentives for energy-efficient homes, increasing from $300 to up to $7,000 for higher EnerGuide ratings after being re-launched as PerformancePlus. Registration fees were rebated for homes achieving certain EnerGuide ratings, though this changed after September 7, 2010.

12α Don‘t know 5 5 α Significantly different from the 2009 sample at the 90% confidence level. Two of the four builders provided suggestions for additional upgrades they would like to see covered by the program. One indicated that he would...

AI summary The survey highlights feedback from builders and homeowners regarding the EnerGuide for New Houses program. Builders requested more recommendations for achieving higher EnerGuide ratings and coverage of electric hot water and in-floor heating. Homeowners requested higher rebates for solar power and heat pumps, as well as more information and advertising about the program.

hedule of the lighting at the 5PM-6PM hour for each location according to information provided by each site contact. Peak kW Savings = Connected kW Savings   Coincidenc e Factor The fundamental calculation of annual energy savings is...

AI summary The document outlines methods for calculating peak kW and annual energy savings from lighting upgrades. It references the use of site-specific data, coincidence factors, and a 7.1% loss multiplier for Small General Commercial customers to estimate savings at the generator level.

77% 83% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 22 3.7 Energy Savings Estimation Table 3-13 presents the net installed annual energy and demand savings for the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install p...

AI summary The 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install program achieved significant energy and demand savings, exceeding its goals and surpassing the combined savings of previous years. The program's success was largely driven by CFL installations, with LED Exit Lights contributing a smaller but notable portion.

4-2 shows the estimated population, sample size and sampling error for the 2008, 2009 and 2010 telephone surveys. For each survey, the sampling error was less than 10% at the 90% confidence interval. Table 4-2: Sample Size and Sampling Err...

AI summary The document discusses the sample size and sampling error for telephone surveys conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, as well as the design and outcomes of a program aimed at installing energy-efficient lighting in small businesses in Nova Scotia. The program installed CFLs and LED exit lights to achieve energy and demand savings targets.

1 6 5 4 3 Reduce carbon † 4 2 3 11 footprint Reduce σ† 3 10 <1 13 maintenance costs Improve existing 3 9 5 4 lighting conditions Past program 1 participation Part of a green 1 initiative Assistance with 1 changing lighting Offer at our 1 f...

AI summary The text presents data on initiatives aimed at reducing carbon footprint, improving lighting conditions, and reducing maintenance costs. It also includes information on past program participation and assistance with changing lighting, with some responses indicating that these efforts did not require much work. The data includes numerical values and symbols, suggesting it may be part of a survey or analysis.

ow/Don‘t recall) On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all important‘ and 5=‗very important‘, how important is reducing energy usage to your company / organization? [9 = Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all im...

AI summary The text contains survey questions about energy usage importance, energy cost management, and the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs. It also asks for suggestions to improve the Efficient Lighting Products Program and inquires about business hours of operation.

ny independent, or part of a larger company? Independent Part of a larger company Don‘t know Refused Other ( _) 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) NMR Process and Impact Evaluation: Prescriptive Rebate Programs 2010 February 25, 2011 Final Repor...

AI summary This document is a final report on the process and impact evaluation of prescriptive rebate programs from 2010, submitted by NMR Group, Inc. to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It was prepared by a team of investigators including Rohit Vaidya, David Barclay, Cheryl Browne, Tom Ledyard, and Aditya Rohilla, with support from KEMA, Inc.

NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page I Executive Summary This report presents the results of the 2010 process and impact evaluations of the Business Energy Rebate (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs conducte...

AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 Business Energy Rebate (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs. It highlights that the SLC program may become obsolete due to upcoming legislation requiring high-performance T8 lighting. The evaluation involved site visits and interviews to assess program impacts.

se of qualified energy efficient equipment. Eligible product categories include:  lighting,  motors and drives,  HVAC,  refrigeration and  compressed air equipment. The BER program was modeled closely after successful prescriptive pro...

AI summary The BER program focuses on the use of energy-efficient equipment in categories such as lighting, motors, HVAC, refrigeration, and compressed air. It was modeled after Efficiency Vermont's prescriptive programs and includes eligibility criteria, savings estimates, and approved product lists.

ons.  Avoidance of plant construction. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 8 2.2 Program Logic Model Figure 2-1: Smart Lighting Choices Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 9 3...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on the Smart Lighting Choices Program and the Building Energy Retrofit (BER) program. It outlines the program logic model and provides an impact evaluation of the BER program, including energy savings and connected demand reductions.

of the approach taken for each NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 11 measure type included in the sample. The evaluated savings used the most accurate information available; secondary sources and assumptions were empl...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on lighting savings analysis. It outlines the methodology used to calculate energy savings, including the use of interactive effects and the formula applied by the DSM Administrator.

xture and lamp make and model. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 12 The quantity of lamps or fixtures installed was verified on-site through observation and through discussion with the site contact. The site contacts...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on verifying installed lamps and fixtures, estimating annual operating hours, and calculating energy savings, including interactive savings from cooling systems.

luation found the baseline operating hours to be much higher than the program had estimated for one of the motors. With the installation of VFDs, the motors ran for less time and at a reduced load. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebat...

AI summary The evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs found that the installation of VFDs on motors and fans led to significant energy savings, particularly in Project K-04 and K-12. The savings were higher than expected due to reduced operating hours and improved efficiency from VFDs.

vely. The demand savings factor for supply and return fans were 0.173 kW/hp and 0.263 kW/hp, respectively. The commissioning factor was 1.05, since the equipment was calibrated by an engineering firm. Table 3-5: Motor and Drive Savings Res...

AI summary The document discusses motor and drive savings results, highlighting specific projects with evaluated energy savings and peak demand reductions. The demand savings factor for fans and commissioning factors are mentioned, along with a table showing savings for different projects.

503.3 72.8 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 25 4 Impact Evaluation: SLC The following impact evaluation of the 2010 SLC program includes an overview of the DSM Administrator-tracked program savings, a description of...

AI summary The impact evaluation of the 2010 Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program details the savings calculated using distributor-reported data on lamp and ballast rebates. The evaluation includes an overview of program savings, methodology, and results, with specific data on the number of lamps and ballasts rebated through the program.

ncy of the heating equipment. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 31 4.3 Program Impact Results Table 4-5 presents the final estimates of savings for the SLC program based upon the analyses described above. This table...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 SLC program's energy savings, reporting 6,922.1 MWh at the meter and 7,434.5 MWh at the generator. It also notes connected and peak demand savings, using a 64.9% average operation time from 5pm to 6pm for lighting products.

Sampling Error at 90% Population Sample Size (n) Confidence Interval Participants 2010 30 11 +20.1% 5.2 Program Goals and Design The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program was a new addition to the DSM Administrator‘s portfolio of energy eff...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program, launched in mid-2010, provided financial incentives for businesses to purchase energy-efficient equipment. It was modeled after Efficiency Vermont (EVT) and aimed to increase market penetration of efficient technologies and raise customer awareness of energy-efficient products.

8 No Don‘t know 1 1 Respondents rated the influence of various aspects of the BER program on their decision to participate in the program on a scale from one (―not at all influential‖) to five (―very influential‖). Information, services, o...

AI summary Respondents evaluated the influence of various aspects of the BER program on their participation. Information, advice, or services from contractors and NSPI representatives were most influential, while program information and rebates were only moderately influential.

were a far greater proportion of their operating costs with energy costs making up 60% of their total budget. (Table 5-15) Table 5-15: Energy Costs as a Percent of Annual Operating Budget Percent of Budget 2010 Sample size (n) 11 Less than...

AI summary The document discusses energy costs as a significant portion of operating budgets, with 60% of one entity's budget attributed to energy costs. This is presented in the context of an evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs.

E] 99. (Refused) – [CONTINUE] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program Page A7 FREE-RIDERSHIP [FR series] [ASK EACH QUESTION IN THIS SECTION FOR EACH MEASURE CATEGORY VERIFIED IN V1 –V5] FR1. Did your company / organization ha...

AI summary This section of the document evaluates the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program by asking participants about their prior plans, alternative actions without the program, and whether the rebate influenced their budgeting for energy-efficient upgrades.

ebate Program Page A16 5. In general, how often do you interact with NSPI energy efficiency program staff? Who do you interact with at NSPI? a. What types of interactions do you typically have with NSPI staff? [Probe: status calls, meeting...

AI summary The text outlines questions related to interactions with NSPI energy efficiency program staff, the use of design professionals in project scoping, and the C&I Custom program delivery process, including steps such as preliminary audits, feasibility assessments, and verification.

cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...

AI summary The document includes questions about participation in NSPI rebate programs, challenges faced, barriers to participation, and satisfaction with program implementation and communication. It also asks about gaps in energy efficiency programs and overall satisfaction with various NSPI programs.

2 3 4 5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures...

AI summary The text asks respondents about energy-efficient equipment and upgrades their company has implemented or is pursuing, including whether they are using Nova Scotia Power rebate programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010 from these measures.

nt programs. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page II close to achieving its one-year energy savings goal of 20,000 MWh but fell notably short of reaching its demand target of 3,410 kW. As energy savings were close to targets but...

AI summary The 2010 C&I Custom Program achieved energy savings close to its target but fell short on demand savings. NMR suggests adapting the program to include demand response incentives. The Business Energy Rebate program was launched to streamline processes. A new Sales Lead position was introduced in 2010, leading to increased participation and savings, with a second Sales Lead added in 2011.

^ Y ra NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A2 Project ID: C-4142145-1 1.0 Facility Overview This is a grocery distribution warehouse. The main areas of the facility include offices, loading docks, and extensive warehouse floor s...

AI summary This document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program at a grocery distribution warehouse. It includes facility details, operational hours, and energy usage. New lighting systems were installed, resulting in energy and demand savings. Adjustments were made to account for transmission and distribution losses, with evaluated energy savings being 6.9% less than tracking savings.

tures were inventoried in offices and hallways. Two-lamp and four-lamp fixtures were also present. Conversions from eight-foot T12 can include two or four T8 lamps installed in the eight foot troffer. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...

AI summary The document describes the process of calculating energy savings from a lighting retrofit program in commercial and industrial settings. Savings were determined by comparing pre- and post-retrofit wattage and multiplying by annual operating hours for each lighting group.

lculations also used incorrect wattage for one fixture type. The 250-Watt high pressure sodium fixtures were rated at 465-Watts in the baseline system. This was changed to 295-Watts in the evaluation. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program at a hardware store facility found that annual energy savings were 93.1% of tracking savings, with variances attributed to reductions in fixture quantity and modifications to baseline calculations. Customer and generator demand savings were also lower than expected, though interactive cooling contributed additional savings.

ows:  Replace 2L 4‘ T12 (120W) and 2L 8‘ T12 (68W) fixtures with 2L (48W) and 4L (98W) low wattage T8 fixtures.  Replace metal halide (457W) fixtures with 6L T8 (221W) high bay fixtures. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tra...

AI summary The document outlines the replacement of high-wattage lighting fixtures with low-wattage T8 fixtures in a commercial setting. It describes the method used to calculate energy savings from the retrofit, including grouping fixtures by area, comparing wattage before and after installation, and using annual operating hours to estimate annual savings.

lly predicted primarily because the load weighted average peak coincidence factor using in the evaluation analysis (.96) was larger than the peak coincidence factor using in the M&V analysis (.75). NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...

AI summary A lighting retrofit project was completed across six buildings, including food processing and packaging plants. The project involved replacing lighting systems in various areas, resulting in energy and demand savings. Savings were recalculated after a site visit and review of documentation, showing evaluated energy savings were 4.7% greater than tracking savings.

4 290 Hillaton N.S. 150HPS 4 175 Total 813 334.1 Avg kW Fixture types and wattages for the pre-existing fixtures were taken at face value since pre-existing fixtures were unavailable for verification at the time of the evaluation-site visi...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a lighting retrofit project, including fixture types, wattages, and the calculation of energy savings using a spreadsheet-based approach. It notes that pre-existing fixtures were not verified and that savings were estimated based on installed and pre-retrofit fixture data.

(1) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A14 where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program by analyzing direct lighting retrofit savings and interactive cooling savings. It calculates energy savings using equations that consider lighting wattage, annual operating hours, and heat gain and seasonality factors. Site personnel confirmed the accuracy of the data, and the results showed reduced cooling costs due to lower waste heat from new lighting systems.

ghting savings [kWh] = Heat gain factor (fraction of the lighting energy assumed to become a load on the space) = Seasonality factor (fraction of the year assumed to require cooling) = Coefficient of performance of the cooling system. A he...

AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from a 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on lighting efficiency improvements. It calculates savings from reduced waste heat, cooling system efficiency, and adjustments for electric heating penalties. Peak demand savings are also estimated based on system load factors.

ve heating penalties were generated for this project. Electric resistance heating exists in offices and some equipment spaces. Some areas are heated by infrared radiant system. These units operate by NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Progr...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows that annual energy savings exceeded tracking savings by 104.7%, with adjustments due to fixture changes. Heating penalties were reduced from 82,022 kWh to 30,017 kWh by eliminating interactions in spaces with radiant heat or fuel oil. Cooling savings were adjusted from 97,427 kWh to 45,587 kWh due to corrected COP values. Peak demand savings were 142.8% of the tracking estimate, influenced by fixture changes and interactive heating and cooling effects.

er holds parties, weddings, remembrance services, seminars, and other events. A typical weekend event runs from 4 PM on Saturday to 1 AM on Sunday. The civic center is generally unoccupied on Sundays. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...

AI summary The project involved installing occupancy sensors, high-efficiency ground source heat pumps, and additional insulation to reduce energy consumption at a civic center. Savings were recalculated using updated energy models, resulting in a 1.6% increase in gross evaluated energy savings over tracking savings.

NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A18 Table 1: Summary of Tracking and Evaluation Savings Results Customer Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 4224 1800 -2424 0.5 0.0 -0.5 HVAC 1...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program by comparing tracking and evaluation results for customer and generator savings in kWh and kW across lighting, HVAC, and insulation categories, showing discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings.

ating of installed cooling equipment (20) [kBtu/kWh] = Heating Coefficient of Performance of installed heating equipment (3.12) = kBtu to kWh conversion factor [kWh/kBtu]. After calculating HVAC and insulation energy savings using Equation...

AI summary The document critiques the tracking analysis used to calculate energy savings from a project, noting that it relied on spreadsheets rather than energy simulation software, used incorrect R-values for insulation, and applied overly conservative efficiency assumptions for heat pumps, which may have led to inaccurate savings estimates.

ng processes typically run 24 hours per day and 6 days per week during their peak season of May to October. During off peak months, the manufacturing schedule drops to 8 hours a day for 5 days a week. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...

AI summary The document discusses a lighting retrofit project completed in 2009 and 2010 at a facility, detailing energy and demand savings. The project involved retrofitting the entire building, including manufacturing, storage, and office areas. Savings were recalculated after a site visit, showing a 3.0% difference between tracking and evaluated savings.

culate annual run hours. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A34 Interactive cooling savings were also claimed for space conditioned areas of the facility. Since the new fixtures operate at lower wattages, and thus impart less h...

AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from the 2010 C&I Custom Program, including interactive cooling savings and peak demand savings. Calculations involve factors like heat gain, seasonality, and coincidence, while adjustments are made for prior savings claims from 2009.

= Connected load reduction = Cooling season heat gain factor = Cooling season seasonality factor = Cooling system coefficient of performance = Peak demand period coincidence factor In the above equation, the seasonality factor scales the d...

AI summary The text explains the calculation of peak demand savings using factors like the seasonality factor and coincidence factor, which adjust demand savings to reflect only the cooling season and account for non-continuous lighting operation during peak periods. Savings from all areas were summed, and project savings were scaled by a factor of .76 to account for overclaimed savings in the 2009 program year.

= Cooling season seasonality factor = Heating season heat gain factor = Heating season seasonality factor = Cooling system coefficient of performance = Heating system efficiency In Equation 2, heat gain factors designate the portion of lig...

AI summary The document discusses the use of heat gain factors and seasonality factors in calculating lighting savings and peak demand savings. It notes discrepancies in heat gain factors between heating and cooling calculations and explains the use of seasonality factors to account for the partial-year usage of heating and cooling systems. A coincidence factor is applied to calculate peak demand savings.

retrofitted on a 1-for-1 basis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A41

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on retrofitted measures implemented on a 1-for-1 basis, as part of a broader assessment.

g database. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A43 Project ID: C-348218-2 1.0 Facility Overview This lighting project was installed across eight different buildings in three locations. These were air maintenance facilities and...

AI summary This document evaluates a 2010 C&I Custom Program lighting retrofit project across eight buildings. The project involved replacing lighting systems in high bay areas, assembly spaces, and offices. Energy savings were recalculated, showing evaluated savings were 19.6% less than tracking savings due to transmission and distribution losses.

8 188 90 Area 5 FB 6L T5HO 83 351 Area 6 FB 6L T-5HO 61 351 Area 7 1L 4' T-8 6 23 Area 7 2L 4' T-8 77 42 Area 7 2L T-8 HBF 60 76 Area 7 4L 8' T-8 482 90 Total 3,163 98.9 Avg/Fixt NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A45 Table 3:...

AI summary The text presents a table summarizing the removal of fixtures across various areas, including the number of fixtures removed and their average per fixture. The table is part of an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program.

te visit and those fixtures are not NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A46 included in the lighting summary. Site personnel could not confirm the installation matches tracking estimates at that site. Fixture tables do not inclu...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows that 87.3% of installed fixtures are T8 lamps and ballasts, while 12.7% are T5 equipment. Some original fixtures remain in the facilities and are not included in the counts.

Total T-8 2,760 87.3% Total T-5 403 12.7% Totals 3,163 100.0% 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet based approach. The lighting retrofit was broken down into groups of lights by...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of tracking savings for a lighting retrofit program. Savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach by comparing pre- and post-retrofit wattage and multiplying by annual operating hours for each group of lights.

es heating costs. Air conditioning loads are reduced resulting in lower cooling costs. The new lighting systems provide additional refrigeration savings for the entire year. The cooling bonus was calculated with the following equation: (2)...

AI summary The document discusses energy savings from new lighting systems, including reductions in cooling and heating costs. Calculations involve factors like direct lighting savings, heat gain, seasonality, and cooling system efficiency. Peak demand savings are also estimated based on location and operation.

d 6. These fixtures are located in NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A49 support/service areas. They are not included in the high-bay work area circuits and do not operate 8760 hour per year. Interactive heating and cooling ef...

AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from a 2010 C&I Custom Program, noting that annual energy savings were 80.4% of tracking estimates, with reductions due to changes in fixture counts and technology. Peak demand savings were 91.6% of tracking estimates. The facility described is a multistory office building in Halifax with 230,000 square feet of leasable space.

he counts made during the evaluation. Question marks next to fixture types indicate cases where the meanings of the pre-existing fixture type names in the tracking spreadsheet were not entirely clear. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...

AI summary The document discusses the method used to calculate tracking savings from a lighting retrofit, including the use of a spreadsheet approach, grouping lights by fixture type and location, and using operating hours data to estimate annual energy savings.

four data loggers. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A52 Interactive heating and cooling savings were also claimed for this project. Since the new fixtures operate at lower wattages, and thus impart less heat to the buildings,...

AI summary The document discusses interactive heating and cooling savings from a project involving new fixtures that operate at lower wattages. These fixtures result in negative heating savings in winter and positive cooling savings in summer, with the net effect calculated using a specific equation that includes factors like heat gain, seasonality, and cooling system efficiency.

= Cooling season seasonality factor = Heating season heat gain factor = Heating season seasonality factor = Cooling system coefficient of performance = Heating system efficiency In Equation 2, heat gain factors designate the portion of lig...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lighting energy savings, including heat gain factors, seasonality factors, and coincidence factors. It notes discrepancies in assumptions between heating and cooling calculations and highlights the use of specific factors by NSPI for consistency in their evaluations.

ly. The office coincidence factor was also applied to all remaining lights in the building since their operating patterns are more likely to follow the office schedules than the emergency schedule. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on the update of coincidence factors and the calculation of demand savings from interactive effects with building HVAC systems. A formula is provided to calculate interactive effects demand savings, incorporating factors such as connected load reduction, heat gain, seasonality, and system efficiency.

od. Equation 3 was applied to all retrofitted areas of the building served by HVAC systems (100% in this case). Savings from all areas were summed to arrive at interactive effects peak demand savings. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...

AI summary The document evaluates a 2010 C&I Custom Program project at a dairy plant, assessing energy savings. Annual energy savings were 99.5% of the tracking savings, while peak demand savings were 99.1%. The slight reduction in savings was attributed to fewer retrofitted fixtures and interactive effects from heating and cooling penalties.

llow a more weekday schedule of roughly 8 am to 5 pm. Heating is provided by #2 oil. Direct expansion cooling equipment provides space cooling. Ammonia chillers are used for refrigeration at the site. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...

AI summary A lighting retrofit project was completed in a facility, resulting in energy and demand savings. The project included replacing lighting systems in various areas, and the savings were recalculated based on a review and verification. Evaluated energy savings were 13.6% greater than tracking savings.

lamp T8 equipment. These new units provide quicker re-strike in these large areas as well as energy savings. The remaining T8 equipment was installed in the offices, lunch room, and mechanical spaces. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...

AI summary The document discusses the installation of new T8 lighting equipment and the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit. Savings were estimated using a spreadsheet approach, grouping fixtures by type and location, and calculating differences in wattage and annual operating hours.

6L T5 250 6L T5 245 Total 334 Total 356 Difference 22 There was also a small variation in equipment type installed. Six-lamp T8 fixtures were observed in production and dry storage areas. These fixtures did not exist prior to the project....

AI summary The text discusses variations in lighting fixtures installed during a project, including potential labeling errors for 6-lamp T5 fixtures. It also evaluates cooling and refrigeration equipment, noting differences in COP values for various refrigeration systems and their impact on energy savings calculations.

efrigeration plant and extensive low temperature loads. Loads in freezers are continuous and year round. A 1.56 COP was assigned to low temperature freezers and a 1.72 COP for all other refrigeration. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...

AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency improvements at a large hotel in Downtown Dartmouth, including the installation of additional lighting fixtures and adjustments to the coefficient of performance (COP) for refrigeration systems, resulting in increased energy and peak demand savings.

g credited to the program under the gross savings work, although the circumstances surrounding their installation suggests they might be considered spillover had they been fully explored at the site. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcula...

AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to calculate energy savings from a lighting retrofit project under the C&I Custom Program. Savings were calculated using a spreadsheet-based approach, grouping lights by fixture type and location, and applying a formula that considers the difference in wattage before and after installation, multiplied by annual operating hours.

iW prei  n postiW posti )h ES L   i 1000 (1) where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh to...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit, including direct savings and interactive effects on heating and cooling systems. It outlines equations used to estimate these savings and highlights assumptions made, such as heat gain factors for heating and cooling.

at gain factors exists. Nonetheless, NSPI used this approach in all of their lighting savings calculations, so it is was left unchanged in the ensuing evaluation analysis for the sake of consistency. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Progr...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings for a C&I Custom Program, including the use of seasonality factors, occupancy sensors, and coincidence factors to determine lighting and peak demand savings.

areas. Since the Metrix analysis was not available for review at the time of the evaluation, savings were calculated relative to the feasibility study savings values available in the tracking system. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The on-site met...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program involved verifying the installation of retrofit fixtures and reviewing lighting operating schedules. Of 655 retrofit fixtures, 582 were verified, accounting for a significant portion of the connected load reduction and energy savings. Adjustments to lighting schedules were made based on discussions with the hotel’s maintenance manager.

for transmission and distribution losses. The evaluated energy savings were ultimately 14.3% less than the tracking savings. Table 1: Summary of Tracking and Evaluation Savings Results Customer Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference...

AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from a C&I Custom Program, showing that evaluated energy savings were 14.3% less than tracking savings. Tables detail the differences in kWh and kW savings for motors under both tracking and evaluated results, as well as an overview of installed and replaced motors.

(2) where, = Installed Motor Power Factor = Installed Motor Nameplate Horsepower [HP] = Installed Motor Nameplate Efficiency NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A69 = Phase-to-Phase Conversion Factor = Preexisting Motor Phase-to...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of power draw for preexisting and installed motors in the context of a C&I Custom Program evaluation. It highlights the use of the preexisting motor's nameplate amperage and the installed motor's power factor, raising questions about the methodology used.

(4) where, = Installed Motor Power Draw [kW] = Preexisting Motor Power Draw [kW] = Preexisting Motor Efficiency NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A70 = Installed Motor Efficiency Finally, savings for a given motor were calcula...

AI summary The document outlines a method for calculating energy savings from motor upgrades in the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It defines variables such as installed and preexisting motor power draw and efficiency, and uses these to calculate energy savings using a formula.

(5) where, = Installed Motor Energy Savings [kWh] = Preexisting Motor Power Draw [kW] = Installed Motor Power Draw [kW] = Annual Operating Hours [h] The operating hours, h, used in Equation 5 were calculated based on the percentage of the...

AI summary The document outlines errors in the methodology used to calculate energy and demand savings from a motor efficiency project. Issues include incorrect power factor calculations, reliance on limited operating data, and flawed peak demand savings estimation. These were later corrected in the evaluation analysis.

95.8 150 96.2 0.4 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A73 Notice that in all cases but one (Item 13), the specifications of the installed motors met or exceed the specifications claimed in the tracking analysis. In addition to g...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows that motor specifications met or exceeded claims, with revised operating hour data collected for analysis. This data was gathered as part of a power factor correction project and used in the evaluation process.

96.2 88.5 40 Not Logged NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A75 Using the data collected on-site, a revised analysis methodology was employed to correct for the errors in the tracking analysis. For the 34 motors where roughly on...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on the methodology used to calculate energy savings. It details two calculation approaches: one using post-installation amperage data for 34 motors and another using pre-installation data for 8 instances.

tt to kW Conversion Factor [W/kW] NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A76 = Installed Motor Nominal Efficiency = Preexisting Motor Nominal Efficiency = Weekly Operating Hours [h] = Annual Schedule Scale Factor In cases where bot...

AI summary The evaluation discusses the methodology used to calculate energy savings from motor efficiency upgrades in the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It explains that post-installation amperage data were used in some cases due to changes in motor load conditions, and outlines the approach for calculating peak demand savings.

lated using the following methodology in cases where post-installation amperage data were available: (8) All variables in the above equation were defined as in Equation 6. The parameter, , acts as a coincidence factor, scaling the demand s...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, noting that annual energy savings were 85.7% of the tracking estimate. Adjustments to post-installation power factor calculations and motor efficiencies contributed to the savings.

s (net positive effect on savings) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A77  Adjustments to the operating hours of the installed motors based on facility data (net negative effect on savings)  Usage of post-implementation met...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that adjustments to motor operating hours and differences in peak coincidence factors significantly impacted energy and demand savings estimates. The use of post-implementation metered data had an indeterminate effect. The evaluation did not find issues with equipment installation but noted methodological changes in savings calculations.

ated as, (1) where, = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) 8,760 = Annual Hours [hours] NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A80 = Intersection number = Quantity of affected intersections = Incandescent light of type a...

AI summary This text provides a formula for calculating direct energy savings from a lighting retrofit, using variables such as the number of affected intersections, wattage of incandescent and LED fixtures, and conversion factors. It is part of an evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program.

OR $ _ (88888=Measure uses fuel other than electricity: What fuel is that? _ IF NON-ELECTRIC FUEL (88888) SKIP TO NEXT MEASURE IN Q21=1.) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C11 Q21A5. (IF Q21A4 ≠ 88888): And how many kilowatt h...

AI summary This document includes a form used to evaluate the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on energy-efficient measures and their expected electricity savings. It outlines procedures for collecting data on kilowatt-hour savings and whether participants plan to implement upgrades through Nova Scotia Power programs.

5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures could...

AI summary The text asks respondents to consider energy-efficient equipment or upgrades implemented or pursued by their company in the past two years, including whether these measures were done independently or through NSPI rebate programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010.

ent measures and processes; or the NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C26 savings could be from PLANNED OR END-OF-LIFE replacements and installations of higher efficiency rather than standard efficiency measures and processes....

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures and their impact on electricity savings, asking participants about the influence of programs like C&I Custom and BER on their decisions to implement energy efficiency actions. It also asks about the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to organizations.

ulate savings were the same as those used in 2008. Given this consistency and the similarity in measure mix installed, we believe the transfer of the 2008 realization rate – which was driven primarily by wattage changes due to spot watts –...

AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, using 2008 realization rates to calculate energy and demand savings. It highlights that energy savings were 12,052 MWh at the meter and 12,944 MWh at the generator, while connected demand savings were 3,712.7 kW and 3,987.5 kW, respectively. A line loss factor of 1.074 was applied for generator estimates.

d about the same as reported in 2008 (15.7%). Among 2010 respondents, energy costs accounted for less than 20% of the annual operating budget for nearly all of the 2009 respondents (87%). (Table 3-18) Table 3-18: Energy Costs as a Percent...

AI summary The text discusses energy costs as a percentage of annual operating budgets for respondents in 2008, 2009, and 2010, showing a decline over time. It also highlights that most respondents consider reducing energy usage and managing energy costs important to their businesses.

costs (96%) were important to their businesses; about one out of four respondents reported that reducing energy usage (75%) and managing energy costs (74%) were ‗very important‘ to them. (Table 3-19) Table 3-19: Importance of Energy Manage...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of energy management to businesses, with a focus on reducing energy usage and managing energy costs. It also highlights the payback requirements for energy efficiency measures among respondents to the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.

Lighting The lighting savings that were estimated are those realized from the replacement of older lighting units with new and more efficient units, thereby obtaining comparable or improved lighting levels using less power. In some situati...

AI summary The document discusses energy savings from lighting upgrades, including the replacement of older units with more efficient ones. It estimates total gross electric energy savings of 514.9 MWh and a peak demand reduction of 75.5 kW for the BER program in 2010, considering both direct and interactive effects such as reduced cooling loads.

Motors and Drives The only equipment installed under the 'motors and drives' category in the NMR sample of sites was variable frequency drives (VFDs). VFDs adjust a motor's speed to meet the load, thereby reducing the motor's input power....

AI summary The 'motors and drives' category in the NMR sample involved the installation of variable frequency drives (VFDs) under the BER program. Four projects were analyzed, with three having unique conditions and one using a methodology similar to the DSM Administrator's for calculating energy savings and peak demand reduction. Estimated energy savings were 345.2 MWh and peak demand reduction of 47.7 kW.

Energy Star Appliances The Power Down appliance rebate opportunity ran from October 1, 2010 through the end of December 2010 and included two appliances: Energy Star refrigerators and Energy Star clothes washers. Recommendation: We recomme...

AI summary The document discusses the Power Down appliance rebate program, which ran in 2010 and included Energy Star refrigerators and clothes washers. It recommends accepting NMR's energy savings results for 2010, increasing in-store promotions for specialty CFLs, and implementing direct monitoring and spillover partitioning for future evaluations.

buildings' performance and, as such, may generate spillover savings that cannot easily be attributed. Residential Existing Houses: In this program, solar hot water heaters are being promoted, despite a TRC of 0.4. ENSC has chosen to promot...

AI summary The text discusses ENSC's promotion of energy efficiency measures in residential existing houses, including solar hot water heaters, ENERGY STAR® freezers, and screw-in CFLs, despite their Total Resource Cost (TRC) failing to meet certain thresholds. ENSC justifies these promotions based on long-term cost efficiencies, brand benefits, and customer value strategies.

- 2. Actual expenditures are subject to audit. 1 Request IR-5: 2 3 Reference: 2012 DSM Plan (E-ENSC-R-10), Exhibit E-1, Appendix B, Table 2: 4 5 Provide a breakdown of new construction versus retrofit in the Prescriptive Rebate 6 program f...

AI summary The document requests a breakdown of expenditures related to the Prescriptive Rebate and C&I Custom programs for Large Industrial Customers, including distinctions between new construction and retrofit categories. It also asks for clarification on the meaning of 'Whole Building' and 'Core Performance' paths in the context of previous DSM plans.

Avon IR-7 Attachment 1 Line # 1 2 COLUMN A B C D E F G H I J K 3 FORMULA J x 75% 4 5 Program Costs by Rate Class Program Costs Directly Assigned to Participating rate Low Income Energy Use Prescriptive Small Business Enabling classes (75%...

AI summary The table provides program costs by rate class for various years, including details on efficient products, existing and new houses, and rebate programs. It includes costs for low-income households, energy use, and other categories. The data is presented with actual and forecasted figures for 2010, 2011, and 2012.

10 12 1. 2010 expenditures are subject to audit. 13 2. Enabling Strategies includes Education & Outreach and Development & Research. 14 3. Does not include ENSC start-up and transition costs.

AI summary The text outlines that 2010 expenditures are subject to audit, Enabling Strategies encompasses Education & Outreach and Development & Research, and excludes ENSC start-up and transition costs.

Avon IR-7 Attachment 2 1 COLUMN A B C D E F G 2 3 Relative Shares of Program Costs Before Accounting for the Municipal Class Low Income Energy Use C & I Prescriptive Small Business 4 Program Efficient Products Existing Houses New Houses Ho...

AI summary The table provides a breakdown of the relative shares of program costs for various energy efficiency initiatives, focusing on low-income households, energy use, and commercial and industrial prescriptive programs. It includes data from 2010 (actual) and forecasts for 2011 and 2012.

10 1. 2010 expenditures are subject to audit. 1 Request IR-8: 24  Historical experience from 2010 programs, including incentives and measure 25 costs, were used to inform ENSC's planned 2012 program costs. 26 27  Direct customer contact...

AI summary The text discusses the use of historical program data and customer surveys to inform ENSC's 2012 program costs, as well as requests for information on new construction projects and access to program plans related to DSM for Large Industrial Customers in 2010-2012.

- participant. 1 Request IR-11: 2 3 Please provide any working papers and studies with respect to the calculation of savings by 4 Extra Large Industrials? 5 6 Response IR-11: 8 Please refer to Multeese IR-8. Date Filed: March 29, 2011 ENSC...

AI summary The text includes requests and responses related to providing working papers and studies on energy savings calculations for Extra Large Industrials and breakdowns of savings attributed to past Codes and Standards. Responses direct the requester to refer to other IRs (Multeese IR-8 and IR-6).

The remaining terms are best defined together: a game-changing measure that could involve a short-term loss for longer-term gain might include, for example, promotion of solar hot water systems that may involve a high first-year cost of en...

AI summary The text discusses the promotion of solar hot water systems as a strategic market-positioning measure that may involve short-term costs but could lead to long-term benefits such as industry strengthening and more affordable systems. It also mentions that such measures can be justified if they accelerate the uptake of other products, contributing to general welfare through economies of scale.

14 2012 DSM Plan Savings and Investment – Residential DSM Programs Only 2012 Investment Lifetime Benefits ($ million) ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings Generator (MW...

AI summary This section outlines the 2012 DSM Plan savings and investment for residential demand-side management programs, providing details on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, demand savings, and cost tests for various residential programs.

a) Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b) TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENSC's and par...

AI summary The text outlines three metrics used to evaluate program benefits: lifetime benefits, TRC (a benefit/cost ratio including ENSC and participants' costs), and PAC (a benefit/cost ratio focusing on ENSC's costs). These metrics assess the net present value of avoided energy and capacity costs over the life of the program.

, and Mobius, Niehaus, and Rosenblat (2005). In these settings, agents make a choice under uncertainty and draw inference from others' behavior because others may have distinct and useful information. & lt;sup>2 Recent work on conditional...

AI summary The text discusses studies on conditional cooperation in public goods contributions, energy efficiency program evaluations, and the impact of randomized trials on energy pricing programs. It also references media coverage and potential investment implications based on credible documentation of program effects.

uded to demonstrate the importance of implementing the program as a randomized trial, it appears that in this particular case, the ATE could have been estimated even in the absence of a control group. The third specification in Table 7.3 r...

AI summary The text discusses the estimation of Average Treatment Effects (ATE) in a randomized trial, highlighting a discrepancy between ATEs calculated using logged and non-logged specifications. The difference is statistically and substantively significant, affecting cost-effectiveness estimates.

- [20] Bernheim, Douglas (1994). "A Theory of Conformity." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, No. 5(October), pages 847-877. - [21] Bertrand, Marianne, Esther Duflo, and Sendhil Mullainathan (2004). "How Much Should We Trust Differenc...

AI summary The text lists a series of academic references related to behavioral economics, psychology, and energy policy. These references include studies on conformity, peer influence, advertising content, and market transformation. The focus is on theoretical and empirical research that could inform policy and program design.

te the average effect on a customer's program savings of a 1-unit increase in heating or cooling degree days. Expanding the degree day model to examine savings trends The second objective of the evaluation (see page 7) is to determine the...

AI summary The text discusses expanding the LFER model to account for degree days and examine savings trends by including trend variables. The model uses a linear trend to assess how program savings change over time, particularly focusing on the impact of heating and cooling degree days on customer savings.

Temperature-related fluctuations around the long term trend The foregoing analysis considers the long term trend in annual savings, with interseasonal, temperature-related fluctuations around the trend suppressed by using average annual he...

AI summary The analysis examines temperature-related fluctuations in annual savings, using average annual heating and cooling degree days to suppress interseasonal variations. The study estimates the impact of temperature on program savings over a 29-month period and compares it to long-term averages. It concludes that temperature-related savings are highest in summer.

he equation used in the calculation of annual savings due to the treatment effect (AnnTE) reported in Table 4-3: $$AnnTE = \alpha_3 \cdot 365 + \beta_{H3} \cdot 2622 + \beta_{C3} \cdot 853 \tag{13}$$ Table 4-3 compares the estimated annual...

AI summary The text presents an equation used to calculate annual savings from the treatment effect (AnnTE) and discusses the results from three methods, all showing similar annual savings of about 2.1-2.2%. The results are reliable with a 95% confidence level ranging from 1.9 to 2.6%, calculated using the delta method based on 2007 energy use data.

Preliminary Budget / Energy Savings Projections

AI summary This section presents preliminary budget and energy savings projections, likely involving analysis of energy efficiency programs and their financial implications.

Two distinct elements - Business Energy Rebate (BER) provides prescriptive rebates (launched in 2010) - -Cover 20-40% of equipment incremental costs - On-bill financing offered for remainder costs - Financing provided interest-free and rep...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebate (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs aim to support energy efficiency through rebates and upstream initiatives. BER covers 20-40% of equipment costs with on-bill financing, while SLC focuses on high-performance lighting. Both programs target market-driven opportunities in natural replacement and new construction, with BER expanding in 2012 to better support specific segments.

Standard program technical / financial assistance components planned for 2012 - assisting customers in identifying and securing services of qualified thirdparty expertise - providing incentives and rebates for initial scoping studies or au...

AI summary The 2012 strategy includes technical and financial assistance components aimed at helping customers with energy efficiency projects, such as providing incentives, rebates, and interest-free loans repayable through Nova Scotia Power bills. The focus is on leveraging these components to create customized offerings for customer facilities.

Preliminary Budget / Energy Savings Projections dg Bu et Inc l A l ta rem en nn ua Ne Sa vin t E ne rgy gs Ge at rat ne or la 2 0 1 2 D S M P n $ ( ) M 20 11 ( h ) GW EN SC PR OG RA MS i de ia l Re nt s f fic du E ien t P cts ro 3.4 5 13 ....

AI summary The document presents preliminary budget and energy savings projections, including figures for various programs and initiatives, such as the 2012 DSM Plan, energy efficiency measures, and residential and commercial energy savings. It includes projected savings and costs for different categories, such as existing homes, new homes, and low-income households.

1 Request IR-23: 2 3 Does ENSC consider the preliminary budget / energy savings projections on slide 51 of the 4 above mentioned presentation to have been a realistic estimate of achievable energy savings 5 for 2012 at the time? For each p...

AI summary ENSC confirms that the preliminary budget and energy savings projections on slide 51 were considered realistic at the time for most programs, except for those involving Extra-Large Industrials, Home Energy Report, and Existing Houses and Low Income Households, which had more aggressive targets. The response also refers to other documents for further details on savings and the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).

ground. 31 Stakeholder NSDOE Topic Emissions Suggestions/Comments 25% of renewables by 2020 doesn't net out for DSM. Response Adding pre-2001 renewables of 8.5% + 14% RES 2019, to get 22.5%, does not factor in the effect of forecast energy...

AI summary The NSDOE provided responses to stakeholder comments regarding renewable energy targets, capital cost modeling, and the differences in delta costs between IGCC and PC units. The NSDOE clarified that DSM effects must be considered in RES calculations and that capital cost models use 2008 dollars with escalation factors. The difference in delta costs is attributed to technological advancements and the nature of CO2 capture integration.

- 5 2013, are: packaged split system air conditioner / heat pumps and electronic thermostats. 1 Request IR-37: 2 3 Custom C&I: Segments to be targeted in 2012 may include grocery stores, schools, large 4 multi-family buildings, military an...

AI summary The document discusses incentive levels for energy efficiency retrofits in grocery stores, including examples and strategic direction from ENSC. It references the C&I Custom program and Small Business Direct Install program, and mentions the SCOPEER Resource Task Force's focus on commercial refrigeration efficiency.

DSM Cost Recovery Rider Appendix B Page 1 of 1 Appendix B: 2010 DSM Plan 2010 DSM Plan Budget 1 ($ millions) Number of Participants / Units Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at G...

AI summary This appendix provides a summary of the 2010 DSM Plan, including budget allocations, number of participants, energy savings, and cost-benefit ratios for various residential, commercial and industrial, and multi-sector programs. The data is presented in millions of dollars and includes incremental annual net energy and demand savings.

- 3 programs and the ENSC startup costs. 1 Request IR-4: 2 With respect to Figure 5.1 on page 14, 3 a) Please confirm that if the overachievements from 2008-09, contributions from the Extra 4 Large Industrials, and Codes and Standards are...

AI summary The document discusses questions regarding the 2012 DSM Plan and ENSC startup costs, including energy savings, investment amounts, and cost comparisons with the 2011 DSM Plan. It also requests explanations for lower energy savings and higher costs in 2012, as well as options to reduce costs.

1. TRC compares the sum of ENSC's and participants' investments against the direct benefits to Nova Scotia (such as avoided costs). 2. PAC compares ENSC's (i.e. NSPI ratepayers') costs against the direct benefits to Nova Scotia (avoided co...

AI summary The text discusses two different approaches to evaluating energy efficiency programs. TRC evaluates the combined investments of ENSC and participants against avoided costs, while PAC evaluates ENSC's costs against avoided costs of electrical capacity and energy.

CBL History ☐ NewPage Year CBL 2007 203 2008 197 2009 193 2010 185 2011 174.5 The following summary table ( Table-2 ) lists both demand and energy consumption savings for a number of key energy efficiency projects that have been implemente...

AI summary The document presents a table showing CBL values from 2007 to 2011 and another table summarizing demand and energy consumption savings from key energy efficiency projects implemented by NPPH since mid-2009. Original estimates provided by NPPH to ENSC and revised estimates reviewed by EPS are included.

7- Eliminate PM1 Disc Filter Pump This project was completed at least 24 months ago (which may disqualify it from counting towards the eligible savings calculation) and generated savings that represents about 0.2% of the reported total. Si...

AI summary The project to eliminate the PM1 Disc Filter Pump was completed over 24 months ago, which may disqualify it from contributing to eligible savings calculations. The savings generated are minimal, at about 0.2% of the total, and fall within the margin of error, so it has not been included in the totals.

Market Function The concept of market function captures the elements of the marketplace in which energy consumption decisions are made. In a perfect market, a number of elements would be in place to support energy efficient choices because...

AI summary The text discusses the concept of market function in energy consumption, emphasizing the importance of true energy cost and the role of externalized greenhouse gas emissions. It highlights the need for a perfect market where energy efficiency and renewable energy sources are economically viable and accessible. Government intervention is noted as necessary for capturing external costs, with examples from the northeastern United States.

British Columbia: Energy Conservation Assistance Program Program Name Energy Conservation Assistance Program Program Highlights AMFP offers both technical and financial services to help buildings identify, finance, implement, and monitor e...

AI summary The Energy Conservation Assistance Program (AMFP) in British Columbia provides technical and financial support for energy-saving measures in buildings, including low-interest loans and needs-based grants. It also offers free training on energy-efficient technologies and is funded based on generated energy savings.

Energy Legislation: - Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act , S.N.S. 2009, c. 3. - Electrical Installation and Inspection Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 141. - Electrical Code Regulations , N.S. Reg. 95/99. - Electricity Act , S.N.S. 2004, c. 25...

AI summary The text lists various pieces of legislation and regulations related to energy in Nova Scotia, including acts and regulations concerning energy efficiency, renewable energy, electrical installations, and energy conservation.

Possible Solutions Conceptually, we see three potential solutions to this problem: - 1. Adjust the TRC so that only the "energy portion" of measure costs are included in the test; - 2. Fix the TRC and Societal Tests by quantifying even in...

AI summary The text outlines three potential solutions to a problem: adjusting the TRC to include only energy costs, fixing TRC and Societal Tests to include non-energy benefits, or changing the test to use PACT. Each option has its supporters and drawbacks.

Switching to the Program Administrator Cost Test The alternative to the two options for fixing the TRC is to replace it with a different test, specifically the PACT.14 This approach has a number of advantages. First, it is much simpler. Th...

AI summary The text discusses switching from the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test to the Payback Analysis Criteria (PACT) for evaluating energy efficiency programs. The PACT is argued to be simpler, less expensive, and more symmetric with supply-side investment assessments. While it may allow some less cost-effective measures from a societal perspective, it ensures cost-effectiveness from the rate-payer's viewpoint. The Home Performance with ENERGY STAR program is used as an example of how the PACT would apply.

17 ENSC does not have information on mercury emissions caps in the noted 18 jurisdictions. 1 Request IR-29: 2 3 With respect to the first sentence of Issue C on page 23 of Appendix C, please provide the 4 source of the $0.27 - $0.28 per Kw...

AI summary The document discusses responses to requests regarding cost calculations and program selection criteria. It explains the derivation of cost ranges, the methodology for program cost estimation, and the factors considered in selecting schools for a pilot program.

Table 2: Residential Existing Houses Program Results by Measure For Plan Year 2012 Measure Name savings at generator 2012 $ A Peak Demand Savings (kW) B First Year Energy Savings (MWh) C Total Avoided Cost Benefits ($) D TRC Costs ($) E =...

AI summary Table 2 presents program results for residential existing houses in 2012, detailing energy savings, cost benefits, and net resource benefits for various measures such as hot water heater upgrades, insulation, and heat recovery systems.

Table 9: Commercial Prescriptive Retrofit (includes ROB and RET decisions) Program Results by Measure ( cludes ROB and RET decisions) Program Results by Measure For Plan Year 2012 Air Receiver / Tank for Screw Compressor 1,326 5583 $5,228,...

AI summary Table 9 presents program results for the Commercial Prescriptive Retrofit program, including ROB and RET decisions, for Plan Years 2012 and 2011. It details the number of installations, costs, savings, and net benefits for various energy efficiency measures.

1 Peak Annual Present Program LED - Screw-in weighted Watts 6 14 152 $60 $104 $19 1.0 $0.25 $0.051 LED Exit 16 11 121 $65 $164 $15 2.1 $0.29 $0.030 LED Strip Light 9 11 314 $30 $284 $40 3.6 $0.16 $0.024 Occupancy Sensor Motion Detector 8 5...

AI summary The text presents a table with data on various energy efficiency programs, including metrics such as peak demand, annual usage, costs, and savings. It highlights different technologies and their associated financial and operational impacts, providing a detailed breakdown for evaluation and analysis.

- 1. TRC compares the sum of ENSC's and participants' investments against the direct benefits to Nova Scotia (such as avoided costs). - 2. PAC compares ENSC's (i.e. NSP1 ratepayers') costs against the direct benefits to Nova Scotia (avoide...

AI summary The text discusses two approaches for evaluating the benefits of energy efficiency initiatives. TRC evaluates the combined investments of ENSC and participants against avoided costs, while PAC compares ENSC's costs against avoided costs related to electrical capacity and energy.

12 A B C 2012 Estimated Eligible Customers Number of Units/Participants/Facilities Participation Rate (C=B/A) Efficient Products 450,000 58,349 (U) n/a Existing Houses 330,000 2,500 (P) 0.8% New Houses 3,000 665 (P) 22.2% Home Energy Repor...

AI summary The table provides participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, showing the number of eligible customers, participants, and participation rates for different initiatives such as efficient products, home energy reports, and prescriptive rebates.

- 3 With respect to Appendix C, page 23, Issue C, please provide ENSC's views on the 2008 - 4 ACEEE and 2009 EEDAL papers by David Nichols and Kenji Takahashi which indicate - 5 that DSM costs per MWh in other jurisdictions have decreased...

AI summary ENSC acknowledges that in certain circumstances, increased energy efficiency program budgets can lead to lower unit costs of savings due to economies of scale, learning curves, and innovations. However, it notes that these factors may not apply equally in all jurisdictions, such as Nova Scotia, due to differences in regional context, electricity rates, and supportive policies.

2012 DSM PLAN TARGETS AND SPENDING - Q. Please summarize your conclusions and recommendations with regard to the proposed - budget, energy savings targets and programs for DSM for the year 2012. - A. While somewhat ambitious, the proposed...

AI summary The 2012 DSM Plan's $43.7M budget is deemed ambitious but aligned with historical ratepayer benefits. Concerns include rising cost-per-MW savings ($352 vs. $264 in 2011) and the need for ENSC to justify increased targets due to capacity/emission constraints. The 2009 Integrated Resource Plan's targets are suggested as a guide, while challenges in integrating multi-fuel DSM programs are highlighted.

BUDGET FOR ENABLING STRATEGIES AND COST ALLOCATION - Q. Please summarize your conclusions and recommendations concerning the Enabling - Strategies and the proposed cost allocation for multi-sector programs. - A. A budget of $5.0 million is...

AI summary A $5.0 million budget is proposed for eight enabling strategies, with allocations to education, research, and other initiatives. ENSC argues allocating 5-15% of its budget to long-term strategies is reasonable for generating longer-term value, even if short-term cost-effectiveness is not immediate.

Energy Management, Markets and Climate Change Division - Leads the province's policy development and response to climate change. This\nissue has been steadily rising in importance and has become the leading\nenvironmental issue facing Nova...

AI summary The Energy Management, Markets and Climate Change Division leads Nova Scotia's climate policy, develops the provincial Climate Change Plan, participates in federal/provincial committees, and manages a $2.3 million annual budget for climate initiatives, energy efficiency, and renewable energy projects.

ance or heating or hot water system that is typically - functioning and not in need of immediate replacement. The space heat fuel conversion - measures are estimated to cost between $3,417 for a wood stove to $18,312 for a high - efficienc...

AI summary The text discusses the high cost of space heat fuel conversion measures, ranging from $3,417 to $18,312, and highlights the challenge of convincing customers to invest in these measures without financial assistance such as upfront rebates or reduced-cost financing.

12 As shown in Table 1, from 2008/09 to 2011, expenditures, energy savings and demand 13 savings were increasing significantly each year. The decreases in 2012 savings seem to 14 be a somewhat regressive step. ENSC's investment is increasi...

AI summary From 2008/09 to 2011, expenditures, energy savings, and demand savings were increasing significantly. However, in 2012, savings decreased, which is seen as a regressive step. ENSC's investment increased only 4.3% compared to 2011, despite expectations of 25% fewer Kwh saved per dollar invested.

15 WHAT ARE YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE 2012 PACKAGE? 1 I would recommend that ENSC adjust its plan to provide energy savings from its 2 programs that are at least equal to the 2011 plan. Such an approach sustains the 3 momentum of the 20...

AI summary The speaker recommends that ENSC adjust its 2012 energy savings plan to match or exceed the 2011 plan to maintain momentum and achieve 2013 targets. They note that savings from large industrials and codes are conservatively estimated at 80 Gwh, with plans for more formal M&V processes in 2011 to refine these estimates.

2. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Q. Please summarize your primary recommendations regarding the pace at which efficiency programs are ramped up over time. - A. I offer the following recommendations with regard to program ram...

AI summary The primary recommendations focus on ensuring ENSC implements cost-effective energy efficiency resources, conducts thorough assessments for future DSM Plans, and includes three-year savings projections. Rate impact analysis should consider all costs and benefits, prioritize high participation, and avoid limiting DSM budgets without justification.

3. RAMP UP SCHEDULE OF EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS 1 2 Please summarize the general conclusions from the 2007 IRP and the 2009 0. 3 IRP with regard to the implementation of energy efficiency programs. 4 A. The 2007 IRP identified a large potential...

AI summary The 2007 and 2009 Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) emphasized cost-effective energy efficiency through Demand Side Management (DSM), with the 2007 IRP recommending 5% of NSPI revenues for efficiency programs. The 2009 IRP maintained DSM targets, aiming for 2% annual electricity use reduction. Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) exceeded 2008-2009 savings targets and met 2010 goals, demonstrating success in early DSM implementation.

1 Q. Does the 2012 DSM Plan budget deviate from the program cost that was 2 proposed in the 2009 IRP? 3 A. Yes. The 2009 IRP included a program cost of $61 million for 2012, but the 2012 4 DSM Plan includes a budget of $43.7 million. ENSC...

AI summary The 2012 DSM Plan budget of $43.7 million deviates from the 2009 IRP's proposed $61 million. ENSC argues that lower funding can still meet energy savings targets by leveraging additional energy savings sources.

recommend that budgets be limited in order to mitigate against rate impacts that are perceived to be too high. I believe that this is an appropriate time for the Board to clarify that the Nova Scotia DSM budgets should not be limited for t...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about high energy efficiency budgets and their potential rate impacts, arguing against limiting DSM budgets without proper analysis. It emphasizes the need for the Board to establish principles for quantifying rate impacts to ensure decisions are based on evidence rather than abstract concerns.

1 that the full, long-term impact on rates and bills be assessed in a comprehensive 2 way. 3 Third, there are several other considerations that should be kept in mind when 4 evaluating rate impacts of energy efficiency programs. In particu...

AI summary The text emphasizes the need for comprehensive assessment of the long-term impact of energy efficiency programs on rates and bills. It highlights the importance of addressing equity issues between participants and non-participants and outlines principles for quantifying these impacts, including considering long-term effects and all associated costs and benefits.

ricity Resources to Provide Reliable, Low-Cost, and Efficient Electricity Services to All Retail Customers , prepared for the Regulatory Assistance Project and the Energy Foundation, October 10, 2003. Air Quality in Queens: Cleaning Up the...

AI summary The text lists various reports prepared for different organizations and regions, focusing on energy efficiency, renewable energy, and electricity restructuring. These reports were prepared for entities such as the Regulatory Assistance Project, Energy Foundation, Natural Resources Defense Council, and others, and cover topics including energy efficiency programs, renewable portfolio standards, and electricity resource planning.

0 GWh for 2012), Mr. 27 Whalen has raised concerns that the lower budget amount for 2012 DSM-funded 28 programs from that forecast in the IRP may be regressive. DATE FILED: April 13, 2011 Page 1 of 4 1 Mr. Woolf, while leaving budget issue...

AI summary ENSC argues the 2012 DSM Plan meets and exceeds IRP energy savings targets while spending $17M less than the original budget. Concerns are raised about potential regressive impacts of reduced funding and insufficient evidence for rate impacts. ENSC highlights challenges in meeting aggressive savings targets and the transition from NSPI to ENSC as DSM Administrator.

level of 24 program spending and energy savings in the development of the 2012 DSM Plan, 25 including expert opinion and experience from leading sources and advice and input from 26 stakeholders. 27 1 See paragraph 22 of the UARB's decisio...

AI summary ENSC challenges Mr. Reed's suggestion to front-load savings from the 2012 DSM Plan, citing NMR's evaluation that CFL program value would diminish by 2012. ENSC also disputes Mr. Woolf's stance on adhering strictly to IRP energy savings targets without rate impact analysis, emphasizing the need for flexibility in cost-effective DSM implementation.

Date Filed: March 29, 2011 ENSC Avon IR-5 Page 3 of 3 Line # 1 2 COLUMN Α В С D E F G Н I J K 3 FORMULA J x 75% 4 5 Program Costs by Rate Class Program Costs Directly Assigned C&I Small to Participating Efficient Existing Low Income Home E...

AI summary The document provides a table showing program costs by rate class for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012. It includes costs for various programs such as rebates, custom incentives, and lighting initiatives, with a breakdown of costs assigned directly to participating rate classes.

29 Notes: System Benefits Combined Class and Participant Benefits Total Program Cost Recovery by Benefits 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% $10,936,664 $32,809,993 $43,746,657 Medium Industrial Large Industrial ELI 2P-RTP Municipal Unmetered Bowater Mers...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing program cost recovery by benefits, with percentages and dollar figures for various categories such as System Benefits, Combined Class and Participant Benefits, and Total. It includes breakdowns for different industrial classes, distribution, and energy-related costs.

- 2010 American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy (ACEEE) : several speaking engagements. - 2010 Association of Energy Service Professionals (AESP) 20th Conference : "Mandatory Energy Disclosure for Existing Homes and Buildings: A N...

AI summary This text lists various speaking engagements and presentations by individuals and organizations related to energy efficiency, sustainability, and utility regulation from 2000 to 2010. It highlights involvement in energy policy discussions and leadership in energy efficiency initiatives.

1 TRC/PAC Benefits and Costs Data mc Benefits (million) mc Costs (million) Benefit! Cost Ratio Total Resource Cost Test (mC)' PAC Benefits (million) PAC Costs (million) Benefit! Cost Ratio Program Administrator Cost Test (PACf ENABLINGSTRA...

AI summary The document presents a table comparing the benefits and costs of various energy efficiency programs and strategies, including education and outreach, development and research, and specific initiatives such as efficient products, home energy reports, and prescriptive and custom programs. It includes benefit-to-cost ratios for both the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests.

5.2.3 Discussion of Reasonable Level of DSM Spending Determining the appropriate level ofDSM is a challenging task for any utility,jurisdictional, or regional organization. There is no single or predominant approach but in many cases resul...

AI summary Determining appropriate DSM spending levels involves balancing program ramp-up time, infrastructure development, and minimum expenditure thresholds to maintain critical capacity. Vermont's example illustrates a 1.5% rate surcharge increasing to 3.0% by 2005. The CAMPUT study highlights varied methods used by utilities and regulators.

NSPI's role in DSM and consequently, whether the DSM Plan it proposes is in the public interest, is cost effective, meets the established objectives, and warrants approval. [2010 NSUARB 155, pp. 5-6] - [3] The shift in responsibility for D...

AI summary The document evaluates NSPI's proposed DSM Plan, focusing on its public interest, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with objectives. Key issues include TRC testing, free ridership, pilot programs, and reporting methods. The Board's Final Issues List outlines evaluation criteria for DSM programs and administrative approaches.

[57] Further, Mr. Whalen recommends: ... that ENSC adjust its plan to provide energy savings from its programs that are at least equal to the 2011 plan. Such an approach sustains the momentum of the 2011 plan and makes the achievement of t...

AI summary Mr. Whalen recommends ENSC adjust its plan to match the 2011 energy savings target, increasing 2012 spending to $53.4 million and achieving 158.6 GWh savings. He argues maintaining this target sustains momentum toward 2013 goals and aligns with TRC/PAC economics, emphasizing ENSC's feasibility claims.

ergy savings from actual DSM programs in future years. [ENSC Closing Submission, pp. 3-5] [66] ENSC acknowledged some of the concerns raised, and submitted that the proper question for the Board is: ... what evidence is on the record to su...

AI summary ENSC argues that the Board should evaluate evidence before approving increased DSM spending, citing concerns over rate impacts and over-achievement of IRP targets. The CA supports the 2012 budget, noting a 100% increase from 2010 and ENS's new operational status. Rate impacts from DSM spending are acknowledged but require careful analysis.

5.4 Reporting of Energy and Demand Savings [103] The Application notes that the proposed target for the 2012 DSM Plan includes savings for ELI projects of 80 GWh in energy and 12 MW in demand. The proposed savings from the adoption of ener...

AI summary The Application outlines the 2012 DSM Plan's proposed energy and demand savings targets, including 80 GWh in energy and 12 MW in demand from ELI projects, and 10 GWh in energy and 2.7 MW in demand from energy efficiency codes and standards. ENSC reports energy savings from ELI projects and code adoption, beyond traditional DSM programs.

[112] ENSC, in its Reply Submission, further added: Keeping in mind that such additional savings from the ELI sector and Codes & Standards are inherently conservative, ENSC contends that the proposed 2012 DSM Plan providing overall cumulat...

AI summary ENSC argues that the proposed 2012 DSM Plan provides reasonable energy savings with appropriate program investment, while Avon supports the current budget and suggests confirming the inclusion of non-program savings.

Request IR-2 - With respect to page 14, Figure 5.1, - a) Please provide the cent/kWh charge that will be applied to ratepayers to collect the 2012 total DSM budget of $43.7 million. If appropriate, please provide the charges separately for...

AI summary Request IR-2 seeks clarification on cent/kWh charges applied to ratepayers for collecting 2010-2012 DSM budgets, requesting breakdowns by customer classes for each year. The focus is on transparency of energy efficiency funding mechanisms.

Request IR-13 - With respect to Appendix C, page 23, Issue C, please provide ENSC's views on the 2008 - ACEEE and 2009 EEDAL papers by David Nichols and Kenji Takahashi which indicate that - DSM costs per MWh in other jurisdictions have de...

AI summary Request IR-13 asks ENSC to comment on 2008 ACEEE and 2009 EEDAL studies by David Nichols and Kenji Takahashi, which suggest DSM costs per MWh decrease as energy efficiency program budgets increase in other jurisdictions. The papers are referenced as attachments.

References - Bender, S., M. Messenger, and C. Rogers. 2005. Funding and Savings for Energy Efficiency Programs for Program Years 2000 through 2004. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission. - Bernow, S., M. Lazarus, and D. von Hippel....

AI summary The references list academic and industry publications on energy efficiency programs, including studies on funding, savings, and data analysis from California's investor-owned utilities. Key sources include the California Energy Commission and Xenergy Inc., focusing on program expenditures and renewable energy potential.

Introduction and Background In the U.S., there are a variety of governmental policies and programs intended to accelerate the acceptance of energy-efficient technologies and practices. Some policies are mandates, while others rely on educa...

AI summary The text discusses U.S. energy efficiency (EE) programs funded by utility ratepayers, aiming to improve building and equipment efficiency through financial incentives, education, and training. These programs, governed by state laws, focus on inducing customer adoption of energy-efficient measures and managing energy use.

both first year and lifetime savings, and others reported only first year savings. Where lifetime savings were not available, we estimated lifetime savings based on the average lifetime of efficiency 3 For example, combining a lighting ret...

AI summary The text discusses methods for estimating energy efficiency savings, including the use of first-year and lifetime savings, the impact of combining efficiency measures, and the estimation of a levelized Conservation Supply Curve (CSE). It also mentions the use of industry-standard assumptions when data is unavailable.

Results: Figure 2 presents a comparison between utility levelized CSE in real 2006$ per MWh saved and annual incremental savings as a percentage of annual sales. Figure 2 includes the trend line for SCE as an example. Table 1 presents the...

AI summary Figure 2 compares utility levelized CSE in real 2006$ per MWh saved with annual incremental savings as a percentage of annual sales, using SCE as an example. Table 1 provides slope coefficients and R² values for the data sets in Figure 2, while Table 2 presents trend lines comparing CSE to lifetime savings.

Works Cited - [1] [ACEEE] American Council for Energy Efficient Economy 2008. The 2008 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, Washington, DC.: ACEEE - [2] [DOE and EPA] U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006....

AI summary The Works Cited section lists various academic and policy documents related to energy efficiency, including reports from the American Council for Energy Efficient Economy, the U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency, and studies on the costs and sustainability of efficiency programs.

References used for Figure 2 and 3 and Table 1 • 4. - [9] [CEC] California Energy Commission. 2008. Data File for Energy Savings and Program Expenditures for Three Investor Owned Utilities for 2000 to 2005. (Unpublished raw data obtained f...

AI summary The document lists references used for figures, tables, and data related to energy efficiency and demand-side management programs. It includes data from various organizations such as the California Energy Commission, Connecticut Energy Conservation Management Board, and others, covering reports and energy efficiency program portfolios.

Request IR-1: With respect to page 1, lines 25 - 26, please provide a copy of ENSC's "comprehensive policy framework". Request IR-2 With respect to page 8, lines 3-4, please provide the adjustments made to Appendix B of the Board's August...

AI summary The document outlines four regulatory requests related to ENSC's policy framework, adjustments to past decisions, data comparisons in figures, and cost analysis of DSM plans. It seeks clarification on energy savings, investment costs, and rationale for 2012 planning differences compared to 2011.

Hard caps on carbon dioxide emissions 1 Hard caps mercury emissions on 2 3 4 Request IR-29 5 With respect to the first sentence of Issue C page 23 of Appendix please provide the on C, 6 7 source of the $0.27 - $0.28 per Kwh. If these are c...

AI summary The text includes several requests for information related to carbon dioxide emissions, program cost comparisons, and the selection criteria for a pilot program. Specific inquiries are made about the derivation of cost estimates, the use of data from other jurisdictions, and the factors influencing school selection for the pilot.

13 2012 Investment ($ Million) Lifetime Benefits ($ Million) Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings @ Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings @ Generator (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC...

AI summary The table presents investment and benefits data for various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia from 2012, including residential, commercial, and industrial initiatives. It highlights energy savings, demand savings, and associated costs for each program category.

ng market transformation. (p.21) - Efficiency Nova Scotia is focused on building capacity to enable Nova Scotia to become a - leader in energy-efficiency services, innovation and know-how. (p.23) - IR 27: With respect to ENSC's guiding pri...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is focused on energy-efficiency services and innovation, including renewable heating strategies and biomass sustainability. The document includes several information requests regarding ENSC's alignment with the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), funding for renewable heating, and sustainability benchmarks for biomass projects.

pilot project relates to provincial government policy initiatives such as the Natural Resources Strategy and other planned utilization of biomass in the province (i.e. Renewable Electricity Plan). ENSC is discussing a mandate for DSM progr...

AI summary The document discusses ENSC's mandate expansion to manage DSM programs for other fuel types, including the need for harmonization with electricity programs. It references ongoing negotiations with the provincial government and the potential impact on the DSM 2012 plan. A multi-year performance framework is proposed, inspired by practices in Vermont.

home heating (4.4). Custom C&I: Segments to be targeted in 2012 may include grocery stores, schools, large multi-family buildings, military and the high-tech industry, among others. (p.22 of 43) IR 37: Please explain what incentive levels...

AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency initiatives targeting custom commercial and industrial (C&I) segments, including grocery stores, and outlines plans for emerging technologies and codes. It includes questions from intervenors regarding incentive levels, strategic direction, and stakeholder engagement in energy efficiency efforts.

fuel supplies and lack of competition. - 10. In this submission EAC will address the following issue areas using the testimony and evidence presented before the Board in this proceeding: - a. 2012 DSM Budget and Proposed Energy Savings fro...

AI summary EAC addresses the 2012 DSM budget's reduced energy savings due to ELI's unforeseen savings, the budget's reasonableness, and the absence of a process for determining energy savings targets. The discussion highlights regulatory discretion and the need for established processes in IRP energy savings targets.

is around $54 million or something like that, do you have any comments saying you can"t meet the targets as 2011 or 2012 targets or 2001 with $54 million thereabouts; you think you can"t or you can? MR. CRANDLEMIRE: I think generally we co...

AI summary Discussion centers on meeting energy efficiency targets with a $54 million budget and evolving LED lighting opportunities. Mr. Crandlemire asserts targets are achievable, citing Slide 51's $56-57 million projection. Mr. Faulkner acknowledges rapid LED market changes, noting the 2012 plan should consider updated products.

al years. And it should look at participants and nonparticipants, because that gives an indication of the people who 1 receive the direct benefit versus those who don"t. THE CHAIR: Is context important? In other words, other pressures on r...

AI summary The discussion highlights concerns about rate impacts from renewable generation costs, feed-in tariffs, and energy efficiency expenditures. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive analysis of long-term rate impacts, public perception challenges, and revisiting the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to determine optimal energy efficiency investment levels.

Introduction On February 28, 2011, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ("ENSC") filed its 2012 DSM Evidence and Plan with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (the "Board"). Please accept the following written submission on behalf of Ne...

AI summary ENSC submitted its 2012 DSM Plan with a $43.7M budget and 233.6 GWh savings target. NPB argues the Board should reject proposals to increase DSM spending, citing short-term rate impacts and issues with Mr. Whalen's responses to Undertakings 2 and 3, while acknowledging ENSC's balanced approach to DSM targets.

1. ENSC's PROPOSED 2012 DSM BUDGET SHOULD NOT BE INCREASED At the outset, NPB believes it is important to emphasize the extensive ramp-up in DSM spending that has occurred in Nova Scotia over the past few years. As Mr. Dunsky notes in his...

AI summary NPB argues that ENSC's proposed 2012 DSM budget should not be increased, citing Nova Scotia's already high DSM expenditures (3.5% of utility revenues), which rank among the highest in North America. ENSC's 2012 plan exceeds IRP targets but NPB contends current spending levels are sufficient given the aggressive energy savings goals already adopted.

2. ASSESSMENT OF RATE IMPACTS AND MR. WHALEN'S ANALYSIS In Mr. Woolf's pre-filed testimony and during the hearing, there was discussion about the impact of DSM spending on customer rates and how such impacts should be assessed in consideri...

AI summary The text discusses the tension between procuring cost-effective energy efficiency and its immediate impact on customer rates, referencing a 2006 Summit Blue study. It highlights that many jurisdictions compromise to balance significant yet limited rate impacts with meaningful DSM programs, contrasting budgets based on IRP or benefit-cost assessments that prioritize long-term resource plans over short-term rate effects.

5 3. THE 2012 DSM PLAN SHOULD BE APPROVED AS FILED 6 ENSC submits that the mix of new and existing programs outlined in the Evidence filed 7 to support the 2012 DSM Plan, including an enhanced suite of Enabling Strategies to 8 support cont...

AI summary ENSC argues the 2012 DSM Plan should be approved as filed, citing stakeholder support, alignment with IRP principles, and a modest budget increase. It emphasizes that the plan's energy savings estimates are conservatively verified and exceed 2009 IRP targets without requiring additional expenditures.

1 3.1 The 2012 Plan Strikes the Right Balance of Energy Savings & Expenditures As noted in the Reply Evidence filed by ENSC on April 13, 2011, 6 2 ENSC has given 3 extensive consideration to various options regarding the appropriate level...

AI summary ENSC argues the 2012 DSM Plan meets IRP energy savings targets while reducing expenditures by $17M compared to the IRP's original $61M budget. The plan incorporates verified non-program savings from ELI projects and Codes/Standards, exceeding incremental and cumulative targets.

4 5. SEGREGATION OF NON-ELECTRICITY PROGRAM COSTS 5 ENSC is fully committed to ensuring that no cross-subsidization occurs of non-electricity 6 efficiency programs from approved DSM funds. In addition to confirmation of the 7 segregated ac...

AI summary ENSC commits to segregating non-electricity program costs from DSM funds to avoid cross-subsidization, seeking expert help for allocation methodology. The approach will be presented to the Board in 2011, with no stakeholder objections noted.

Delivered by E-mail Nancy McNeil Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3rd Floor 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692 Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. McNeil: Re: Efficiency Nova Scotia DSM Plan 2012 - E-...

AI summary The Avon Group submits comments on Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2012 DSM Plan, acknowledging stakeholder consultations but raising concerns about program budget allocation and inclusion of non-program savings. The submission references Matter No. M03669 and emphasizes the need for transparency in resource distribution.

OVERALL BUDGET The Avon Group is supportive of the overall program budget as filed with its recognition of non customer-funded program savings from Codes and Standards and the extra large industrial class. The overall program budget for 20...

AI summary The Avon Group supports the 2012 program budget, noting its marginal increase from 2011 and exceeding 2009 IRP savings targets. The 2012 DSM Plan achieves higher energy and demand savings than IRP targets, with savings from non-customer-funded sources like codes and standards.

he market and tempered by 2010 participation, but acknowledged it is "more than estimate than a scientific projection". The starting point was the 2010 participation.1O 6 Transcript, p.89. 7 Transcript, p.91 and 2009 NSUARB 116. S Transcri...

AI summary ENSC proposes $1.473 million for large industrial customers, citing 2010 data showing $527,908 actual spending versus $800,000 forecasted. An administrative error misattributed 2010 spending to the wrong class, prompting an updated response. Variance analysis highlights underperformance relative to forecasts.

CONCLUSION On behalf of the Avon Group, we recommend: - (a) the budget as filed, be approved, subject to either a deduction for budgeted DSM expenditures assigned to the large industrial class (or a reallocation). It is recommended that 20...

AI summary The Avon Group recommends approving the budget with adjustments to DSM expenditures for large industrial customers, confirming non-program savings inclusion, directing ENSC to engage directly with industrial clients, confirming multi-sector cost allocation, scrutinizing shared services, and requiring rate impact information in future DSM filings.

Program Energy Savings and Expenditures In its evidence ENSC forecasted its annual energy and demand savings as 233.6GWh and 44MW, respectively. ENSC's proposed investment in its 2012 DSM programs is $43.7million. ENSC's proposed plan for...

AI summary ENSC forecasts 233.6GWh annual energy savings and 44MW demand savings, with a $43.7M investment in 2012 DSM programs. Cumulative savings would exceed IRP targets (541GWh energy, 99.6MW demand) but fall slightly below demand targets. ENSC includes savings from industrial codes and prior program overachievements, reducing 2012 savings to 124.1GWh (energy) and 23.2MW (demand) compared to 2011. ENSC claims this meets IRP targets with investment below the $61M program cost cap.

REASONS TO ADOPT THE BUDGET AND ENERGY SAVING TARGETS AS FILED The Consumer Advocate's support for the budget and savings targets contained in the 2012 Plan is based on the following factors. - 1. Since 2008, electricity ratepayers in Nova...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate supports the 2012 DSM budget and energy targets, citing past success, Efficiency Nova Scotia's transitional operations, and the need for cautious spending. While recommending additional DSM spending, Board consultant Mel Whalen's analysis is acknowledged, but the Advocate favors the filed plan to ensure ratepayer confidence during the transition.

the ostensible 'climate debt' and equity considerations of this global issue for which we in the First World are largely responsible. However, these matters are clearly beyond the scope of the Board. NPB has suggested that the Board reject...

AI summary The EAC recommends including Glenn Reed's lighting program improvements and diversifying DSM programs with increased budgets and savings targets. NPB opposes non-ratepayer consultants' suggestions for the 2012 DSM plan, while EAC emphasizes the value of independent expert perspectives. The Board is urged to consider these recommendations for program development.

ENSC The EAC respectfully objects to ENSC's suggestion that 'there is a high level of agreement with respect to the elements of the 2012 DSM Plan' for which ENSC is seeking approval. While the EAC does support the marginal increase in the...

AI summary The EAC objects to ENSC's claim of broad agreement on the 2012 DSM Plan, emphasizing its exclusion from key proceedings and concerns over ENSC's reliance on past ELI savings. It supports increased DSM funding but stresses the need for equitable savings frameworks and proper evaluation of ENSC's program approaches.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: - 1) The Board approves the proposed 2012 investment of $43.7 million for ratepayer funded DSM programs; - 2) The Board approves the proposed targets including non-program contributions from ELI customers and co...

AI summary The Board approves a 2012 $43.7 million investment for ratepayer-funded DSM programs, sets targets including non-program contributions from ELI customers, and permits ENSC to apply the TRC test at the program level starting January 1, 2012.

[54] By comparison, in its Application, ENSC proposes 2012 program costs of $43.7 million, with Figure 4.2 showing cumulative savings of 543 GWh and 100 MW, which translates into incremental savings of 233.6 GWh and 44 MW. These results in...

AI summary ENSC's 2012 program proposes costs of $43.7 million with projected savings of 543 GWh and 100 MW, but these figures include over-achievements from prior years and preliminary savings. Excluding these, the savings are significantly lower than the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) targets. Board Counsel Consultant Mr. Whalen expressed concerns that the 2012 plan would deliver lower energy and demand savings than in 2011 and be less cost-effective.

[57] Further, Mr. Whalen recommends: ... that ENSC adjust its plan to provide energy savings from its programs that are at least equal to the 2011 plan. Such an approach sustains the momentum of the 2011 plan and makes the achievement of t...

AI summary Mr. Whalen recommends ENSC adjust its plan to achieve energy savings equal to the 2011 target, increasing 2012 spending to $53.4M. This would result in incremental savings of 158.6 GWh and 29.4 MW, with cumulative savings of 487.6 GWh and 86.4 MW. He argues maintaining the 2011 target sustains momentum and makes 2013 targets achievable, citing comparable economics and TRC/PAC metrics.

ergy savings from actual DSM programs in future years. [ENSC Closing Submission, pp. 3-5] [66] ENSC acknowledged some of the concerns raised, and submitted that the proper question for the Board is: ... what evidence is on the record to su...

AI summary ENSC argues that the Board must evaluate evidence before approving significant DSM spending increases, noting that current spending already exceeds IRP targets. The CA raises concerns about a 100% budget increase for 2012, citing Efficiency Nova Scotia's new operational status and potential short-term rate impacts. ENSC emphasizes that DSM spending reduces customer bills, requiring careful rate impact analysis.

4.2.1 Findings - [71] The Board understands that the targets for energy and demand savings are considered to be aggressive when compared to other jurisdictions; however, these targets and associated investments were established early in th...

AI summary The Board acknowledges the aggressive DSM targets set in the IRP and notes NSPI's success in meeting them. ENSC, as the new administrator, finds the 2012 targets challenging but achievable. The Board supports including non-program funded savings to meet IRP targets and approves the 2012 DSM investment of $43.7 million.

5.1 Total Resource Cost ("TRC") [82] ENSC's application proposes to use the TRC test at the program level and not at the measure level starting in 2012: ENSC is proposing that the TRC test for the 2012 DSM Plan be applied at the program le...

AI summary ENSC proposes applying the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test at the program level for the 2012 DSM Plan instead of the measure level, allowing for consideration of strategic and long-term benefits. While supported by the CA and the Province, concerns were raised about the TRC test's limitations in capturing non-energy benefits.

5.1.1 Findings [87] The Board has considered the ENSC's request to change the TRC test from the measure level to the program level. There appears to be no opposition to this request and the Board agrees with the benefits and flexibility wh...

AI summary The Board has approved ENSC's request to change the TRC test from the measure level to the program level, effective January 1, 2012, recognizing the benefits and flexibility this change will provide.

5.4 Reporting of Energy and Demand Savings [103] The Application notes that the proposed target for the 2012 DSM Plan includes savings for ELI projects of 80 GWh in energy and 12 MW in demand. The proposed savings from the adoption of ener...

AI summary The Application outlines the 2012 DSM Plan's energy and demand savings targets, including 80 GWh and 12 MW from ELI projects and 10 GWh and 2.7 MW from energy efficiency codes. ENSC reports energy savings from ELI projects and code adoption, moving beyond customer-funded DSM programs.

5.1.2 Adoption of Energy-Efficiency Codes and Standards In this filing, ENSC has reported energy savings attributed to the adoption of codes and standards from two sources: a new residential energy code and a new federal standard for gener...

AI summary ENSC reports energy savings from new residential and federal lighting standards, and plans to include NSPI initiatives in future DSM Plans. ENSC also proposes supporting new energy codes and standards for residential and commercial sectors, including T-8 lighting and a national commercial building energy code.

5.4.1 Findings [114] The Board has considered the issue of including non-program savings in the overall cumulative savings planned for 2012. ENSC is proposing to include savings from work already undertaken by the ELI customers and expecte...

AI summary The Board has approved ENSC's proposed savings targets for 2012, including non-program contributions from ELI customers and expected changes to codes and standards, despite concerns about potential delays in implementation.

5.5 Integrated Multi-Fuels Mandate [117] ENSC noted that the Province is in the process of changing its mandate and future responsibilities: With the expectation that ENSC will obtain a multi-fuels mandate in time for integration with 2012...

AI summary ENSC is transitioning to an integrated multi-fuels mandate, aiming to streamline processes and reduce costs. Concerns were raised about cross-subsidization and the need for clear cost allocation. The CA urged ENSC to develop a plan to prevent electricity ratepayers from subsidizing non-electricity users. Avon recommended a public report on shared service cost allocations.

[124] ENSC, in its Closing Submission, further added that: ENSC is fully committed to ensuring that no cross-subsidization occurs of non-electricity efficiency programs from approved DSM funds. In addition to confirmation of the segregated...

AI summary ENSC emphasizes its commitment to preventing cross-subsidization of non-electricity efficiency programs using DSM funds and plans to seek expert assistance for transparent expense allocation between electric DSM and non-electric efficiency programs.

ENSC. EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Recommendation NH-R1. Under these circumstances, the program has two choices for its future direction. It should consider raising the minimum EG level to 85. This would help provide further separ...

AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program is considering raising the minimum EnerGuide (EG) level to 85 or exiting the rating system to provide direct incentives for specific measures. The program is currently tied to the EnerGuide rating system, and there is no plan to exit for new houses. A new federal rating system is expected in early 2012, which may influence rebate requirements.

1. Specific Action Items Specific Action Items R2. … continue to recommend moving measurement more in the direction of electrical measurement and passive (instrumented) monitoring and less in the direction of modeling and social science, t...

AI summary The text outlines specific action items related to measurement and evaluation practices, including a shift towards electrical measurement and passive monitoring, and the implementation of two-hour monitoring for retired refrigerators in the Appliance Retirement and Replacement Program. ENSC is also mentioned as having selected an evaluator for the 2011 evaluation cycle.

Efficient Products Retail Recommendations Efficient Products Retail Program R1. We recommend acceptance of NMR's energy savings and demand reduction results for this program for 2010. The methods used in the analysis were appropriate for t...

AI summary The document discusses recommendations for the Efficient Products Retail Program, including accepting NMR's 2010 energy savings results, continuing residential programs for demand-side management, and using actual kWh data for future evaluations. ENSC agrees with these recommendations and plans to consider improvements.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ("ENSC"), which was created by legislation that was proclaimed January 22, 2010, is subject to regulation by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board ("NSUARB" or "Board"). It filed its first Electricity...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is regulated by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). ENSC filed its first Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Plan, the 2012 DSM Plan, and the NSUARB issued a decision and order in 2011. With ENSC's expanded mandate, the Board directed ENSC to develop a cost allocation model and policy to track time and costs for electric and other fuel mandates.