Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M04819

10 11 Figure 2.1 - 2011 Evaluated Savings Results Energy Target Result (GWh) (GWh) Demand Target (MW) Result (MW) ENSC DSM Programs 158.5 141.8 30.9 28.9 Adjustment to ELI Savingsa - 74.2 - 5.8 Total 158.5 216.0 30.9 34.7 a in addition to...

AI summary Figure 2.1 presents the 2011 evaluated savings results for ENSC DSM programs, showing energy target results of 158.5 GWh and demand target results of 30.9 MW. The adjustment to ELI savings adds 74.2 GWh and 5.8 MW to the total, resulting in 216.0 GWh and 34.7 MW, respectively.

12 Adjustment to Savings from Extra-Large Industrial (ELI) Projects In its 2012 DSM Plan filed in February 2011, ENSC recorded 80 GWh of energy savings and 12MW of demand savings from energy efficiency projects completed by the ELI class o...

AI summary The document discusses an adjustment to energy savings recorded from Extra-Large Industrial (ELI) projects under ENSC's 2012 DSM Plan. Initial estimates of 80 GWh of energy savings and 12MW of demand savings were conservative and subject to further evaluation. Energy Performance Services (EPS/Canada) Inc. conducted an analysis, with the report included as Appendix D.

1 [2010] NSUARB 155. 1 as part of its evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs; the results are documented in the 2011 2 DSM Evaluation Report filed separately. 3 4 The evaluated results for the ELI projects are: 154.2 GWh of energy savings, compar...

AI summary The 2011 DSM Programs achieved 154.2 GWh of energy savings and 17.8 MW of demand savings, exceeding preliminary estimates. The UARB approved up to $41.9 million for the 2011 DSM Plan, with actual expenditures totaling $35.8 million based on unaudited financial results. Figure 2.2 provides a breakdown of expenditures and energy savings by program category.

Through the Efficient Products program, CFLs and LED exit-sign lamps were installed for 4,595 businesses, non-profit and institutional customers in 2011. Additional efforts included a successful LED lighting pilot for applications not suit...

AI summary In 2011, the Efficient Products program installed energy-efficient lighting in 4,595 businesses and institutions. Additional initiatives included LED lighting pilots, program enhancements for compressed air systems and energy management systems, and outreach to specific customer segments. The Embedded Energy Manager program was piloted and will continue with dedicated support for large customers.

An avoided cost of $135/MWh was provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and capacity. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacit...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs provided by NSPI in 2012, including energy and capacity costs, and introduces metrics such as lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC for evaluating program efficiency. It references figures showing program level savings and investment for 2013 to 2015.

Figure 4.2 - 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2013 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource C...

AI summary Figure 4.2 presents the 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, detailing investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy savings across various residential and business programs. The table highlights the financial and energy efficiency outcomes of different demand-side management initiatives.

Figure 4.3 - 2014 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 1 2014 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource...

AI summary Figure 4.3 presents the 2014 DSM Plan savings and investment data, including investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests for various programs. It highlights the financial and energy impacts of residential and business DSM initiatives.

An avoided cost of $135/MWh was provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and capacity. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacit...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs provided by NSPI in 2012, including energy and capacity costs. It also explains metrics such as lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC, which compare benefits and costs over the life of program measures, including participation by low-income households.

Figure 4.4 - 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 1 2015 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource...

AI summary Figure 4.4 presents the 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, detailing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy savings for various residential and business DSM programs. The table highlights the financial and energy impact of each program, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and enabling strategies.

Figure 4.6 - Estimated Savings from Codes and Standards 2013-2017 Incremental Annual Savings Saninas Ango 201 13 20 14 201 15 201 16 201 17 Notes Savings Area GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW Notes Residential new construction 1 2.8 0.7...

AI summary Figure 4.6 presents estimated savings from energy codes and standards between 2013 and 2017, including residential and non-residential construction, lighting, and street lights. The data shows incremental annual savings in GWh and MW for each category, with notes indicating the specific codes and standards adopted.

of a replaced measure 1 practice or standards have an estimated annual kWh usage lower than the 2 replaced measure. 3 4  For a replaced measure with an RUL, future cumulative energy savings 5 could change when the RUL expires. A new savin...

AI summary The document discusses the implications of using a dual baseline approach for calculating energy savings in ENSC programs. It notes that while the annual incremental savings calculation would remain unchanged, cumulative savings would decrease because current methods claim full replacement savings, rather than adjusting for the expiry of the replaced equipment's useful life.

Figure 1.1 - 2013-2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resou...

AI summary Figure 1.1 presents data on the 2013-2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, including investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests. The data is presented in millions of dollars and gigawatt-hours, with figures for each year and total investments and savings over the period.

8 10 11 12 13 Figures 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 present program investment budgets, and the incremental annual GWh energy and the MW demand net savings at generator for 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. They also provide the lifetime total resourc...

AI summary The text discusses program investment budgets, energy and demand savings, and the results of the total resource cost (TRC) and program administrator cost (PAC) tests for 2013, 2014, and 2015. It presents net present value of avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios for each year.

Figure 1.2 - 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2013 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource C...

AI summary Figure 1.2 presents the 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, highlighting the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings for various programs under residential and business/non-profit categories. It also includes metrics like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).

An avoided cost of $135/MWh was provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios related to energy efficiency programs. It mentions an avoided cost of $135/MWh provided by NSPI in 2012 and explains how lifetime benefits are calculated using net present value. It also defines TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios used to evaluate program effectiveness.

Figure 1.3 - 2014 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2014 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource C...

AI summary Figure 1.3 presents the investment and savings data for the 2014 DSM Plan, showing the financial and energy benefits of various demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business initiatives, along with enabling strategies such as education and research.

An avoided cost of $135/MWh was provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and capacity. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacit...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs of energy and capacity provided by NSPI in 2012 and the calculation of lifetime benefits using net present value. It also introduces TRC and PAC, which are benefit/cost ratios used to evaluate program measures, including participation by low-income households.

Figure 1.4 - 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2015 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource C...

AI summary Figure 1.4 presents the 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, detailing investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy and demand savings across various programs. The table includes data on residential and business programs, as well as enabling strategies, with metrics such as the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).

Low Income The Low Income Homeowners component builds on the existing program, providing free energy audits and turnkey implementation of energy efficiency measures at no cost to participants. Building envelope measures include upgrades su...

AI summary The Low Income Homeowners component provides free energy audits and implementation of energy efficiency measures for low-income households. It includes building envelope upgrades, appliance replacements, and customer education. Green heating systems are promoted to increase the use of renewable energy sources for heating. ENSC plans to develop qualified contractor lists and address barriers to adopting advanced technologies like automated pellet boilers.

3.2 Custom Incentives The Custom program is designed to secure cost-effective electrical energy savings from energy efficiency projects and to promote efficient fuel choices in new construction projects as well as existing facilities. The...

AI summary The Custom Incentives program helps customers achieve energy savings through tailored energy efficiency projects. It supports engineering studies, upgrades, and the installation of energy-efficient products not covered by standard rebate structures. Eligible measures include system upgrades and green heating systems, with incentives based on energy savings and design efficiency.

The table below summarizes our findings. CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e...

AI summary The table summarizes findings related to oversight and performance drivers for ENSC, highlighting areas such as incentives, resources, and transparency. It notes that ENSC has no sales disincentive, strong reputational incentives, and challenges with long-term commitment and annual approval processes. The section will provide recommendations to address these shortcomings while maintaining current strengths.

Table 1: Costs by Program, 2013 – 2015 ($ thousands) Program Type 2013 2014 2015 Residential Programs Efficient Products $3,852 $4,013 $4,844 Existing Homes $7,427 $8,581 $9,399 Home Energy Report $1,017 $1,017 $1,017 New Construction $4,1...

AI summary Table 1 provides a breakdown of program costs from 2013 to 2015, categorized into residential, commercial and industrial, and enabling strategies programs. The data includes costs for efficient products, home energy reports, and education and outreach initiatives. DSM costs for future years are based on proportional mark-up over direct program costs.

Derivation of Allocated Costs Table Page TABLE 1 (2013) Allocation of program costs associated with system benefits Attachment 1-1 TABLE 2 (2013) Allocation of Program Costs associated with participating classes Attachment 1-2 TABLE 2 a) (...

AI summary This section outlines the derivation of allocated costs associated with system benefits and program participation across different years (2013–2015) and provides references to attachments containing detailed tables of cost allocations and DSM program participation data.

Bill Impacts by Rate Class Table Page Table 3.1 Residential (Domestic) Attachment 3-1 Table 3.2 Residential (Domestic, winter time-of-day) Attachment 3-2 Table 3.3 Residential (Domestic, non-winter time-of-day) Attachment 3-3 Table 3.4 Sma...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing the allocation of program costs associated with system benefits, including the distribution of costs between generation, transmission, and demand-related factors. It outlines the breakdown of program costs, with 25% allocated to system benefits and 75% to combined class and participant benefits.

E-ENSC-R-12 Line # TABLE 1 (2014) Alloc ation of 25% of p program cos sts associated with system ber nefit 38 subsequently scaled in proportion to the change • - • • • ruei Compilance riii ing subinission, 39 3 Source: Nova Scotia Power In...

AI summary The document presents a table related to the allocation of program costs associated with system benefits in 2014. It includes details on different rate classes and program categories, though the data appears incomplete or corrupted in parts.

Table 3– Projects found to significantly affect energy consumption, INITIAL REPORT Feb 2 # Project Title Year started estimate based on preliminary projects review Comments GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 74.00 8.5 Start-up June 30, 2...

AI summary Table 3 lists energy consumption projects that significantly affected energy use, including upgrades and optimizations at various facilities. The table includes details such as project titles, start dates, energy savings in GWh and MW, and comments on the impact of each project.

Table 5 – Contents of regression analysis modelling files Tab Content Purpose Appendix 3a) NPPH Mill Regressions (Rev 4) – All modeling work except PM2 blower project Tab-1 PI system vs NSPI bills Check accuracy & validity of energy data i...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the contents of regression analysis modelling files, including tabs for energy data verification, regression models, and the impact of various factors on energy performance. The purpose of each tab is described, such as checking the accuracy of energy data, analyzing regression equations, and evaluating the effect of ambient temperature on refining energy.

As discussed earlier, we have used standard conditions of 1,400 t/d and 10°C for 365 days/yr. Converting this to an annual basis produces 511,000 t/of paper. The top-down total mill electricity linear regression equations developed for the...

AI summary The text discusses the development of linear regression equations to predict total electric load at a pulp and paper mill based on paper production, TMP production, and temperature. The models show strong statistical fit with R² values above .99, though variability remains due to real-world complexity.

6.1TMP plant projects As discussed earlier, the refiners in the TMP plant represent two thirds of the NPPH mill's total electrical consumption. For all three projects with measurable results, we looked exclusively at the changes to refiner...

AI summary The TMP plant projects at NPPH significantly impact electrical consumption, with refiners accounting for two-thirds of the mill's usage. Statistical analysis identified energy savings from projects, despite challenges in disaggregating concurrent projects. The baseline for reporting was adjusted to July 2008, and regression analyses showed weather had no significant effect on refining energy consumption.

7. AGGREGATED PROJECT RESULTS Finally, as per the suggested procedure within the SEP M&V protocol, we have tallied all the bottom-up energy saving estimates in order to compare them to the top-down estimate derived from the mill aggregated...

AI summary The text discusses the comparison of bottom-up energy saving estimates with top-down estimates using aggregated consumption data. It notes that project 4 has not been commissioned and therefore does not contribute to the validated savings. Totals are presented both with and without project 4.

Some of the mechanical systems that qualify for an additional rebate include: Mechanical System Rebate Heat pump $900-1200 Drain water heat recovery $130 Solar domestic hot water $1250 Programmable thermostats $15 Efficient Lighting $100 \...

AI summary The document lists mechanical systems that qualify for additional rebates, including heat pumps, drain water heat recovery, solar domestic hot water, programmable thermostats, and efficient lighting, along with the corresponding rebate amounts.

10 11 Figure 2.1 - 2011 Evaluated Savings Results Energy Demand Target Result (GWh) (GWh) Target (MW) Result (MW) ENSC DSM Programs 158.5 141.8 30.9 28.9 Adjustment to ELI Savingsa - 74.2 - 5.8 Total 158.5 216.0 30.9 34.7 a in addition to...

AI summary The document presents evaluated savings results from the ENSC DSM Programs and an adjustment to ELI Savings in 2011, showing energy and demand savings compared to targets. The total energy savings are 216.0 GWh, and demand savings are 34.7 MW.

1 [2010] NSUARB 155. 1 as part of its evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs; the results are documented in the 2011 2 DSM Evaluation Report filed separately. 3 4 The evaluated results for the ELI projects are: 154.2 GWh of energy savings, compar...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2011 DSM Programs, highlighting energy savings of 154.2 GWh and demand savings of 17.8 MW, compared to preliminary values. Expenditures for the 2011 DSM Plan totaled $35.8 million, below the approved $41.9 million. Figure 2.2 provides a breakdown of expenditures and energy savings by program.

Through the Efficient Products program, CFLs and LED exit-sign lamps were installed for 4,595 businesses, non-profit and institutional customers in 2011. Additional efforts included a successful LED lighting pilot for applications not suit...

AI summary In 2011, ENSC implemented various energy efficiency programs, including the Efficient Products program, Custom program, and Prescriptive Rebates program, targeting businesses, non-profits, and institutional customers. Outreach efforts were directed at specific sectors, and new initiatives such as the Embedded Energy Manager program were piloted to support large customers.

Figure 4.1 - 2013-2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment including Outlook to 2017 Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at...

AI summary Figure 4.1 presents data from the 2013-2015 DSM Plan, showing investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy savings over time. The table includes metrics such as incremental annual net energy and demand savings, as well as cost tests for the program.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum o...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits using net present value of avoided costs, and introduces TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios for evaluating program measures. It also references figures that provide program level savings and investment data for 2013, 2014, and 2015.

Figure 4.2 - 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2013 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource C...

AI summary Figure 4.2 presents the 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, outlining the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy savings for various residential and business DSM programs in Nova Scotia. The table highlights the financial and energy outcomes associated with each program.

1 Figure 4.3 - 2014 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2014 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource...

AI summary Figure 4.3 presents the 2014 DSM Plan Savings and Investment data, showing investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy savings across various programs, including residential and business initiatives. The table includes metrics like TRC and PAC tests for each program category.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum o...

AI summary The text explains how lifetime benefits are calculated as the net present value of avoided costs over the life of program measures, and introduces TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios that compare these benefits to the combined and individual costs of ENSC and participants, respectively. It also notes the inclusion of low-income household participation.

1 Figure 4.4 - 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2015 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource...

AI summary Figure 4.4 presents the 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, detailing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, and energy savings for various residential and business DSM programs. The table includes metrics such as incremental annual net energy savings and program cost tests.

of a replaced measure 1 practice or standards have an estimated annual kWh usage lower than the 2 replaced measure. 3 4  For a replaced measure with an RUL, future cumulative energy savings 5 could change when the RUL expires. A new savin...

AI summary The text discusses the implications of adopting a dual baseline approach for ENSC programs, noting that while annual incremental savings calculations would remain unchanged, cumulative savings claims would decrease. This is because current methods claim full replacement savings, whereas the dual baseline approach would account for changes in savings upon the expiry of the replaced equipment's RUL.

the noted concerns, it is prudent for ENSC to complete a more thorough analysis to determine if the implementation of a dual baseline approach is feasible. ENSC commits to the following tasks in 2012: determine the programs in which early...

AI summary The text discusses ENSC's commitment to analyzing the feasibility of a dual baseline approach in 2012, including evaluating other jurisdictions' experiences and assessing the potential benefits and costs of implementation in Nova Scotia.

1.1 2013-2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2 4 5 1 ENSC will invest $144.4 million (in 2013 dollars) over three years, from 2013 to 2015, to achieve 410.8 GWh and 79.8 MW of incremental installed annual net savings at the generator. The...

AI summary ENSC plans to invest $144.4 million (in 2013 dollars) from 2013 to 2015 to achieve 410.8 GWh and 79.8 MW of incremental installed annual net savings at the generator. The investment and savings targets are outlined in Figure 1.1.

8 9 10 11 12 13 Figures 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 present program investment budgets, and the incremental annual GWh energy and the MW demand net savings at generator for 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. They also provide the lifetime total resou...

AI summary The text discusses program investment budgets and their associated energy and demand savings for 2013 to 2015. It also references the Total Resource Benefits, Total Resource Cost (TRC) test results, and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test results for the same period.

& lt;sup>c PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to ENSC's costs. Figure 1.2 - 2013 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2013 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Gene...

AI summary The text presents a table detailing the 2013 DSM Plan, showing investment, lifetime benefits, and various cost and benefit ratios for different programs, including residential and business initiatives. The PAC, a benefit/cost ratio, is highlighted as a key metric for evaluating program efficiency.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENSC's...

AI summary The text explains how lifetime benefits are calculated as the net present value of avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the program's lifetime. It also defines TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios that compare these benefits to the combined and individual costs of ENSC and participants.

& lt;sup>d Includes participation by low income households. Figure 1.3 - 2014 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2014 2014 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)^a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Increme...

AI summary The 2014 DSM Plan Savings and Investment table outlines the financial and energy savings from various demand-side management programs, including residential and business initiatives, with metrics such as investment, benefits, energy savings, and cost tests.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENSC's...

AI summary The text discusses how lifetime benefits of program measures are calculated using net present value of avoided costs, including energy and capacity, and introduces the TRC, a benefit/cost ratio that compares these benefits to the combined costs of ENSC and participants.

& lt;sup>c PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to ENSC's costs. d Includes participation by low income households. Figure 1.4 - 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment 2015 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ milli...

AI summary The text presents a table summarizing the 2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment, including investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and various cost-benefit ratios for different DSM programs in Nova Scotia.

3.2 Custom Incentives The Custom program is designed to secure cost-effective electrical energy savings from energy efficiency projects and to promote efficient fuel choices in new construction projects as well as existing facilities. The...

AI summary The Custom Incentives program is designed to support cost-effective energy efficiency projects and promote efficient fuel choices in new and existing facilities. It provides financial assistance for engineering studies and upgrades, and is tailored to complex projects that do not fit prescriptive rebate structures. Eligibility includes new construction and major renovations, with incentives based on energy savings and efficient design features.

The table below summarizes our findings. CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e...

AI summary The table summarizes findings regarding the oversight framework for Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC). It outlines criteria such as performance drivers, latitude, oversight, and cost, with notes on ENSC's lack of sales disincentives, strong reputational incentives, and challenges related to annual approval processes and cost considerations.

CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e Co st Examples Are profits unaffected by...

AI summary This table discusses the criteria and performance drivers for ENSC (Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia), including components such as incentives, resources, responsiveness, and oversight. It outlines ENSC's current status, proposed changes, and notes on budget, flexibility, and transparency. The table also highlights the regulatory cost and long-term predictability challenges.

Table 1: Costs by Program, 2013 – 2015 ($ thousands) revised 04/18/12 Program Type 2013 2014 2015 Residential Programs Efficient Products $3,997 $4,189 $5,014 Existing Homes $8,718 $10,351 $11,543 Home Energy Report $1,017 $1,017 $1,017 Ne...

AI summary The document presents a table of program costs from 2013 to 2015, detailing expenses for residential and commercial programs, as well as enabling strategies. It notes that future DSM costs will be calculated using a proportional markup over direct costs, with a shift in allocation methodology from customer count to proportional benefit based on ENSC's total direct costs.

Derivation of Allocated Costs Table Page TABLE 1 (2013) Allocation of program costs associated with system benefits Attachment 1-1 TABLE 2 (2013) Allocation of Program Costs associated with participating classes Attachment 1-2 TABLE 2 a) (...

AI summary The text outlines the derivation of allocated costs related to energy efficiency programs, including tables from 2013 to 2015 that detail the allocation of program costs associated with system benefits, participating classes, and DSM program participation, both before and after accounting for the Municipal Class.

5 All residential rate classes use the same unit fixed cost estimate TABLE 2 (2013) Preliminary Allocation of 75% of DSM Program Costs associated with benefits realized by participating classes COLUMN A B C D E F G H I J K FORMULA ∑ col A...

AI summary The table outlines the preliminary allocation of 75% of DSM program costs among various rate classes, with the residential rate class showing the highest allocation. The data highlights the distribution of costs across different categories such as existing homes, new construction, and energy efficiency programs.

32 E-ENSC-R-12 TABLE 2 b) (2013) Preliminary Estimate of DSM Program participation by rate class after accounting for the Municipal Class 5 Column K Column H Column L C + E 6 Total Expenditure by Rate Class System Benefit Costs (25% of the...

AI summary The table provides a preliminary estimate of DSM program participation by rate class in 2013, after accounting for the municipal class. It details total expenditure by rate class, system benefit costs, participating class benefit costs, and total allocated costs, with percentages and dollar amounts for each category.

E-ENSC-R-12 1 FORMULA Program costs incurred on participating rate classes ∑ col A to J K 75% Program Costs Program Existing Homes Construction New Efficient Products Home Energy Report Prescriptive Custom Small Business Education & Outrea...

AI summary The document presents a detailed breakdown of program costs incurred on various rate classes, including residential, small general, general demand, and large general, with figures distributed across different programs such as home energy reports, efficient products, and education and outreach.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the period of January to March, 2011 Energy Performance Services (EPS/Canada) Inc. ("EPS) carried out a preliminary review of energy efficiency projects undertaken at the New Page Port Hawkesbury ("NPPH") and Abiti...

AI summary EPS conducted a detailed M&V of energy efficiency projects at NPPH and a preliminary analysis at ABL. Using the SEP M&V Protocol and IPMVP, energy savings at NPPH were estimated at 154.2 GWh per year and 17.8 MW in average electricity demand savings.

Table 1 - Summary of Results # Project Title Project Start Adjusted INITIAL REPORT estimate Bottom-up estimate based on statistical energy analysis Top-down Estimate GWh MW MW GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 63.9 7.3 53.4 6.1 2 Optimi...

AI summary Table 1 summarizes the results of various projects with details on their start dates, initial estimates, and energy-related metrics. The table includes projects such as upgrading Line 1 Refiner, optimizing Line 3 Production, and others with associated energy data. The introduction section is referenced but not detailed in the text provided.

Table 3– Projects found to significantly affect energy consumption, INITIAL REPORT Feb 2 # Project Title Year started estimate on preling projects minary Comments GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 74.00 8.5 Start-up June 30, 2010. Becau...

AI summary Table 3 lists energy consumption projects that significantly impact energy use, including upgrades and optimizations at various facilities. The table includes project titles, start dates, energy estimates, and comments on their impact.

o-world.org/) September 2010, EVO 10000 – 1:2010 Superior Energy Performance, Plant Measurement and Verification Protocol (Draft) February 25, 2011 , p.1-1 The Regents of the University of California adjusted reporting-period consumption t...

AI summary The report discusses the methodology used for evaluating energy efficiency projects, including the use of adjusted baseline and reporting periods, daily time-weighted averages, and the elimination of unusable data points to ensure accurate modeling of energy consumption.

4.7Basis for Adjustments We have used the standard conditions method (SEP framework) or normalized savings method (IPMVP framework). The table below, which is repeated from page 11 of this report shows the standard conditions used. See sec...

AI summary The document discusses the use of the standard conditions method (SEP framework) and the normalized savings method (IPMVP framework) for adjustments. It references a table from page 11 and directs readers to section 4.4 for further details on the selection of these conditions.

Table 6 – Adjusted INITIAL REPORT project estimates to compensate for error in INITIAL REPORT paper/TMP ratio assumption # Project Title Adjusted Feb 2011 estimate Original Feb 2011 estimate GWh MW GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 63.9 7.3...

AI summary Table 6 adjusts initial project estimates for errors in the paper/TMP ratio assumption. The table lists three projects with adjusted and original estimates in GWh and MW, showing reductions in both energy output and capacity. The section '4.8 Energy Prices' follows the table, indicating a potential discussion on energy pricing.

6.1TMP plant projects As discussed earlier, the refiners in the TMP plant represent two thirds of the NPPH mill's total electrical consumption. For all three projects with measurable results, we looked exclusively at the changes to refiner...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of energy consumption changes in the TMP plant projects at NPPH, highlighting that refiners account for a large portion of the mill's electrical use. Statistical analysis was used to identify energy savings, with challenges in disaggregating results for concurrent projects. The baseline for reporting was adjusted to July 2008 based on observed trends, and regression analyses showed that weather had no significant impact on refining energy.

The Performance Plus rebates pertaining to an EnerGuide rating are as follows: EnerGuide Rating Rebate 83 and 84 $3000 85 to 87 $5000 88 and above $7000 Other mechanical systems facilitate additional rebates. In fact, monetary incentives a...

AI summary The Performance Plus program offers rebates based on EnerGuide ratings, with higher ratings qualifying for larger rebates. Additional rebates are available for energy-efficient mechanical systems such as heat pumps and programmable thermostats, which help reduce energy bills over time.

Some of the mechanical systems that qualify for an additional rebate include: Mechanical System Rebate Heat pump $900-1200 Drain water heat recovery $130 Solar domestic hot water $1250 Programmable thermostats $15 Efficient Lighting $100 \...

AI summary The text lists mechanical systems that qualify for additional rebates under a program, including heat pumps, drain water heat recovery, solar domestic hot water, programmable thermostats, and efficient lighting, with corresponding rebate amounts.

2011. The following table details these targets by larger categories in comparison with the evaluated results. Table 3: 2011 Savings Targets Presented to the PDWG and Evaluated Results

AI summary The text references a 2011 table comparing savings targets presented to the PDWG with evaluated results, though the specific details of the table are not provided.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary 1.3 OVERALL PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS In addition to the performance of individual programs, it is worth looking at individual programs’ contributions over the years from a mor...

AI summary The document presents an overall portfolio analysis of program contributions to total energy savings between 2008 and 2011, evaluating individual programs' performance from a global perspective. Table 4 quantifies each program's share of portfolio savings during this period.

constraints, early replacement situations were not addressed. It is important to address this issue carefully with ENSC in order to better understand where dual baselines could be implemented across 1 HOT2000 is residential energy analysis...

AI summary The text discusses the need to address early replacement situations in ENSC's programs and the potential use of dual baselines for evaluation. It notes that residential programs may not be suitable for dual baselines due to information challenges, while commercial programs may be viable candidates. Discussions with ENSC are recommended to define realistic implementation strategies.

r has the following recommendations, where applicable, to supplement and improve the tool: Table 9: General Recommendations on ENSC Program Manuals No. Recommendations OV-R1. Provide a “base case”: The program manuals do not provide a “bas...

AI summary The text outlines two recommendations for improving ENSC program manuals. The first suggests including a 'base case' to document variables used in calculating gross savings. The second recommends documenting parameters used to estimate program objectives, including distortion and interactive effects, and adjusting them annually based on evaluation results.

in program manuals and explained during training to all relevant staff members. ENSC would benefit from standardizing the data tracking across all programs. Ref.: 5725 19 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation E...

AI summary The document discusses the need for ENSC to improve data tracking and automation in its programs. It suggests automating routine functions, developing a validation process, and enhancing the data tracking system with additional information for better evaluation of DSM programs.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary ARet-R4 Conduct on-site metering for dehumidifiers and room air conditioners: The metering conducted at the recycling facility included the consumption measurement of 29...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of an appliance retirement program (ARET) and an appliance replacement program (ARep) in Nova Scotia. It highlights the limitations of metering data collected at a recycling facility and recommends on-site metering during the summer in homes. The ARep program achieved energy and demand savings in 2011 through refrigerator and freezer replacements.

No. Recommendations SLC-R1. Improve the quality of distributors’ invoices and develop a tracking sheet that monitors program savings for the whole year: Several formats are used in the invoices provided by distributors. These invoices do n...

AI summary The recommendations focus on improving distributor invoice quality and collecting additional data through telephone surveys with C&I customers to better monitor program savings and evaluate retrofit activities, including de-lamping and T8 lamp replacements.

ponsibility change in the coordination of the call center and the pick-up service by the DA can improve this situation. Table 29: Recommendations for Improving Program in Future Recommendations 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 90 Better advertisin...

AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving a program, focusing on better advertising, improved scheduling, accepting more product types, and enhancing communication. It includes survey data from 2010 and 2011 showing varying levels of satisfaction and suggestions for improvement.

on. To do so, Econoler reviewed the following parameters: > adjusted unitary savings; > energy-to-demand ratio; > interactive effects; > free-ridership; and > spillover. The review of the unitary savings calculations is mainly based on the...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program in 2011, focusing on parameters like unitary savings, free-ridership, and spillover effects. It also describes the sampling methodology for on-site visits and the types of appliances retired, with refrigerators being the most common.

gs Value 1,004 kWh/yr 10 New York Department of Public Service, Technical Resource Manual for Multifamily Replacement Refrigerators, September 29, 2010. Ref.: 5725 37 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...

AI summary The document presents an evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on energy savings calculations for refrigerators and freezers. It details the methodology used to estimate average unitary savings values, including data from metering activities and participant surveys.

ed Product List, www.energystar.gov, list posted on January 17, 2012. 12 Natural Resources Canada, Energy Consumption of Major Household Appliances Shipped in Canada, Trends from 1990- 2008, p.71. Ref.: 5725 40 Efficient Products – Applian...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of partial use factors for secondary freezers in the Appliance Retirement Program, using a sample size of 39 freezers. It also mentions the application of a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.82 for freezers, similar to the approach used for refrigerators.

or secondary – not replaced – freezers. Using the proportion of each category resulting from the participant survey, the average unitary savings value for freezers is estimated at 1,117 kWh per year. Ref.: 5725 42 Efficient Products – Appl...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from the Appliance Retirement Program, specifically focusing on freezers and dehumidifiers. Savings estimates are based on survey data and comparisons with new ENERGY STAR-qualified models.

880 kWh/yr 18 ENERGY STAR, Program Requirements for Dehumidifiers – Eligibility Criteria – version 3.0, http://www.energystar.gov/specifications. Ref.: 5725 45 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...

AI summary The document discusses the average annual energy savings of 880 kWh for dehumidifiers and the inclusion of room air conditioners in the Appliance Retirement Program. Due to distorted metering data, savings estimates for room air conditioners were based on a similar program's results.

aced by new ENERGY STAR-qualified units. For the new ENERGY STAR-qualified units, Econoler used the following parameters, also based on the evaluation of the OPA’s 2008 Every Kilowatt Counts program: > an EER value of 10.7 Btu/W-h, which c...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings value for retired room air conditioners, using parameters such as EER, capacity, and hours of operation. It references the OPA’s 2008 program and estimates annual consumption for new ENERGY STAR-qualified units in Nova Scotia.

average unitary savings value for room air conditioners based on the proportion of each category of participants. Table 44: Unitary Savings Value for Retired Room Air Conditioner Units Room Air Conditioner Unit Replaced Not Replaced Averag...

AI summary The document discusses the average unitary savings value for retired room air conditioners in Nova Scotia, estimated at 197 kWh per year. It also mentions the energy-to-demand ratio used for calculating demand savings in the ARET program, which is 6.27 GWh/MW.

t program based on an energy-to-demand ratio of 6.27 GWh/MW. This ratio was obtained from the adjusted 2011 program targets, by dividing the target energy savings by the target peak demand savings. Ref.: 5725 48 Efficient Products – Applia...

AI summary The document discusses the revised gross savings calculation for the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, which includes energy-to-demand ratio adjustments and savings from various program components, such as in-store weekend events and the Multi-Unit Residential Renter pilot program.

etail Markdown Program. Finally, since there was only one appliance retired through the Efficient Products - Multi-Unit Residential Renter pilot program, the unit was also claimed in this evaluation. Overall, total gross energy and demand...

AI summary The text discusses energy and demand savings from the Efficient Products - Multi-Unit Residential Renter pilot program, noting only one appliance was retired. Total savings at the meter are 8.163 GWh and 1.302 MW, while generator-level savings are estimated at 9.020 GWh and 1.439 MW, using a line loss factor provided by Nova Scotia Power.

generator, energy and demand savings are estimated at 9.020 GWh and 1.439 MW, using a line loss factor of 1.1050 estimated for the residential sector. This value was provided by Nova Scotia Power. Table 45: Evaluation Results – Gross Energ...

AI summary The text provides an evaluation of gross energy and demand savings from appliance retirement programs, including refrigerators, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room AC units. Line loss factors and energy-to-demand ratios are used to calculate savings at both the meter and generator levels, with data provided by Nova Scotia Power.

he equation below. The energy savings (kWh) associated with the additional retirements were estimated using the adjusted unitary savings value reviewed in this evaluation for each type of appliances. % From the 90 participants surveyed, tw...

AI summary The evaluation report estimates energy savings from the Appliance Retirement Program, considering spillover effects and free-ridership. It calculates a net energy savings of 6.493 GWh and 1.036 MW at the meter, and 7.175 GWh and 1.144 MW at the generator, using the NTGR value of 0.79.

Initial Gross NTGR Net Savings Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 5.661 GWh 0.74 4.189 GWh Evaluation Results 9.020 GWh 0.80 7.175 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.903 MW 0.74 0.668 MW Evaluation Results 1.439 M...

AI summary This report evaluates the Energy Savings and Demand Savings from the Appliance Retirement Program (ARET) and other efficiency initiatives by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in 2011. Tracked and evaluated savings are presented, with a note on the NTGR used for different retirement methods.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The evaluated net savings exceeded those tracked by ENSC by 71 percent. This result was mainly due to the revision of the unitary savings values for each type of appliances. For ref...

AI summary The 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation shows that net savings exceeded tracked savings by 71%, largely due to revised unitary savings values. Metering data was used for refrigerators and freezers, while dehumidifiers and air conditioners relied on Ontario studies. Recommendations include on-site metering during summer and collecting appliance and usage data.

Program 1. Provide a “base case”: The program manual does not provide a “base case” Manual that provides information on how the assumed gross savings have been Content established. For refrigerators and freezers, they are calculated on a c...

AI summary The document highlights the need for the program manual to include a 'base case' for calculating gross savings, document parameters used for estimating program objectives, and refine and disseminate marketing plans. It emphasizes the importance of transparency, validation, and updating of methodologies and assumptions for accurate forecasting and evaluation.

Program 5. Facilitate tracking of savings by using adjusted unitary savings values: In Tracking 2011, a metering study was conducted as part of this evaluation. The results were Sheet used to estimate the unitary savings values for each ty...

AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving program tracking by adjusting unitary savings values based on evaluations and removing unnecessary fields from tracking sheets. It emphasizes the importance of specific data fields for accurate energy consumption estimation and suggests focusing on essential information for effective program administration.

m air conditioners, which is a key determinant of energy consumption for those appliances. Information on the number of months the appliance is used could also be useful in order to estimate the partial use factor for refrigerators and fre...

AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving data collection and program implementation in energy efficiency initiatives. It highlights the need to standardize data entry, use drop-down lists, and address customer reluctance to replace working appliances as key barriers to program success.

Responses a. The $35 incentive provided _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused by Efficiency Nova Scotia b. Information or advice _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused received from the program c. Removal and recycling services provided for...

AI summary The text discusses responses to questions about the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, including incentives, information received, and removal and recycling services. It also asks about willingness to pay for refrigerator removal and includes questions about replacing the retired appliance.

ators, a preferred retailer, Gallery 1, was selected through a request for proposal (RFP) process. This retailer offered customers an additional rebate to the one already provided through the program. The program collaborated with commissi...

AI summary The Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program in 2011 achieved significant energy savings by replacing 531 refrigerators, 62 freezers, and 107 mini-fridges with ENERGY STAR units. The program generated 0.548 GWh of net energy savings, a notable increase from 2010. A special project at Dalhousie University and collaboration with partners contributed to these results.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Satisfaction The retailer partner contacted during an in-depth interview expressed a very high level of satisfaction with the overall program as well as with ENSC’s team and other p...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's ARep program highlights high satisfaction from a retailer partner, but notes a need for financing options to improve program implementation. The program achieved 0.548 GWh of net energy savings and 0.065 MW of demand savings at the generator in 2011.

the addition of a field to validate the ENERGY STAR criterion and to identify the energy consumption of the appliance would ensure that savings are calculated correctly. Ref.: 5725 vi Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program Effi...

AI summary The Appliance Replacement Program, launched in 2011, aimed to replace old refrigerators in multi-unit residential buildings with ENERGY STAR®-qualified units. Incentives were initially based on a sliding scale but were later changed to a flat $200 rebate. The program also partnered with a retailer, transportation service, and recycler to facilitate the replacement and disposal of old appliances.

R refrigerators that was added to the program incentive. However, landlords could choose any retailer. The program also partnered with a transportation service and a recycler to retire old appliances. The ARep program was designed as a mar...

AI summary The ARep program aimed to replace older refrigerators in multi-residential buildings with ENERGY STAR appliances, targeting electricity and demand savings. It partnered with landlords and used sales representatives to generate leads. However, the program was not pursued in 2012 due to high costs per KWh.

the average unitary savings value estimated for each refrigerator replacement and compute the gross savings by multiplying this average value by the quantity of refrigerators replaced. > Include a field to validate the ENERGY STAR qualific...

AI summary Econoler recommends adding a field to validate ENERGY STAR qualification in the ARep program's tracking sheet to ensure compliance. While most appliances meet the criteria, a small percentage did not, though adjustments to savings calculations were not necessary.

ore, Econoler did not apply any adjustments in the savings calculations but repeats its recommendation to include a field to validate that the ENERGY STAR criterion has been respected. > Include a field to indicate the annual energy use of...

AI summary Econoler evaluated the Appliance Replacement Program and found it well-designed but with potential for improvement. It recommended adding a field to track annual energy use of new appliances and validating the ENERGY STAR criterion in the tracking sheet to enhance evaluation accuracy.

g sheet. The gross savings calculation is made by using an average unitary savings value for each refrigerator replaced. ENSC estimates this value at 437 kWh, based on the 2010 ARep evaluation report. In 2011, an important project was held...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for refrigerator replacements under the Appliance Replacement Program. ENSC uses an average unitary savings value of 437 kWh, based on a 2010 evaluation report. Adjustments were made using a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.79 derived from the California Appliance Retirement Program.

e used in the 1 The Cadmus Group, Residential Retrofit – High Impact Measure Evaluation Report, Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission – Energy Division, February 8, 2010, p.141. Ref.: 5725 13 Efficient Products – Applianc...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses the energy consumption of refrigerators under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Replacement Program. It compares the energy use of old and new ENERGY STAR-qualified refrigerators, using metering data to determine average consumption values and savings.

rs. The on-site visits revealed that all new refrigerators had been installed in accordance with the data found in the tracking sheet. Hence, the installation rate for the ARep program is 100 percent. The on-site visits were also used to v...

AI summary The on-site visits confirmed 100% installation rate for the ARep program, but found that some refrigerators did not meet ENERGY STAR qualifications. ENSC explained this was an isolated case due to a language barrier, and adjusted savings calculations accordingly. The energy-to-demand ratio for the program was calculated as 8.49 GWh/MW.

-demand ratio of 8.49 GWh/MW. This ratio was obtained from the adjusted 2011 program targets, by dividing the target energy savings by the target peak demand savings. 4.2.4 Revised Gross Savings Gross energy savings for the program were re...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of the energy-to-demand ratio and its use in revising gross energy and demand savings for a program. The revised figures are presented, along with the line loss factor used to estimate savings at the generator level. The document also notes the reliance on data from the ARep program due to the lack of rate codes for participants.

ternal spillover. 8 From the 2011 socket study conducted by CRA with 1,004 households of Nova Scotia. 9 Statistics Canada (CANSIM), Households having air conditioning, Nova Scotia, 2009. Ref.: 5725 20 Efficient Products – Appliance Replace...

AI summary The ARep program's 2011 evaluation report estimates net energy and demand savings, using a net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) of 1 and assuming no interactive effects. The total net energy savings are 0.497 GWh at the meter and 0.548 GWh at the generator, with corresponding demand savings of 0.059 MW and 0.065 MW.

lude the savings from the products sold during both markdown periods, from the specialty CFLs given away during in-store weekend events and from the products sold through the Air Miles pilot project. Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Eval...

AI summary The net evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC's programs were lower than the tracked savings. This discrepancy is due to differences in the NTGR used, the inclusion of replacement ratios and in-service rates, and revised unitary savings values for certain products.

ished with retailers across Nova Scotia to offer discounts on multipacks containing four or more ENERGY STAR®-qualified CFLs and any size package containing ENERGY STAR- qualified specialty CFL bulbs. In 2010, the RMP offered discounts on...

AI summary The Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011 continued to offer discounts on ENERGY STAR-qualified products, including CFLs and certain lighting fixtures, but with changes due to market saturation, such as limiting discounts to CEE Tier 3 appliances and multipacks of CFLs.

C should add a table with the unitary savings values for each product and calculate the savings in the tracking sheet with a formula referring to the values in the unitary savings table. > Keep track of the manipulation made for calculatin...

AI summary The text outlines recommendations for improving the tracking sheet used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in the Retail Markdown Program (RMP). It suggests adding a table with unitary savings values, tracking package-to-unit conversions, including technical product details, and using more descriptive field titles to enhance data accuracy and usability.

2011 Evaluation Report extends the in-market period and features varying promotional efforts throughout the year, should resolve these challenges. 3.6.2 Interview with Retailers Six retailers were interviewed under the evaluation of the RM...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses interviews with six retailers regarding the RMP, highlighting high satisfaction with the program but noting issues with marketing materials, including confusion from varying discounts and a lack of customization for different products.

ncy Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Opinion on Program Duration, Barriers and Recommendations All retailers interviewed prefer a two-month offer to a year-round offer. However, some retailers do believe that the markdown per...

AI summary Retailers generally support the program and suggest improvements like shorter markdown periods, weekend events, and more training for sales staff. Customers are highly familiar with the ENERGY STAR label, with 80% of participants and 61% of non-participants showing some familiarity.

the same as non-participants (4.9 CFLs). As stated in the past, the difference in purchase habits between participants and non-participants suggests that the program increased customer CFL purchases. Furthermore, when analyzing the number...

AI summary The report evaluates the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by analyzing CFL purchases among participants and non-participants. It finds that participants purchased more CFLs than non-participants and that overall CFL purchases remained high in 2011. A socket study confirmed residual potential for CFL adoption.

11 3 6 5 Not at all 2 2 2 1 Satisfied Ref.: 5725 35 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 IMPACT EVALUATION 4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact e...

AI summary This section outlines the impact evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011, focusing on determining energy and demand savings. The evaluation considers unitary savings per product, replacement ratios, and market effects. New products added in 2011 include LED lamps and motion sensors.

in the figure below. Figure 3: Light Output Equivalency for Incandescent Lamps to CFLs7 7 ENERGY STAR, “ENERGY STAR Qualified Light Bulbs – 2006 Partner Resource Guide.” Ref.: 5725 37 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency...

AI summary The analysis of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Econoler found that the average power of CFLs sold was 14.4 watts, replacing incandescent lamps with an average power of 64.9 watts, resulting in a typical wattage difference of 50.5 watts. The majority of participants selected CFLs based on light output equivalency, and daily usage was revised to 2.4 hours based on metering studies.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report In 2011, ENSC conducted a socket study with 1,004 respondents. This study investigated CFL installations, indicating that 94 percent of CFLs were installed inside houses while the r...

AI summary In 2011, ENSC conducted a socket study showing that 94% of CFLs were installed indoors, with an estimated daily usage of 2.7 hours. Econoler recommended using metering data over self-reported estimates, leading to an updated unitary savings value of 49.8 kWh for CFLs in the RMP. The study also noted that replacement of CFLs may not generate additional savings.

arket, it is likely that many CFLs will be replacing other CFLs. Such replacement affects a portion of the market that is already transformed and does not generate savings attributable to the program. A replacement ratio was measured throu...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses the replacement ratio of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in the Retail Markdown Program, noting that 20% of CFLs purchased replaced other CFLs, which affects gross savings calculations. The report explains that the replacement ratio applies only to regular CFLs due to differences in market timing and survey targeting.

s can only be applied to regular CFLs. Specialty CFLs have particularities that prevent them from being considered as regular CFLs, such as higher prices and a lower penetration rate. In-Service Rate For various reasons, it is possible for...

AI summary The document discusses the in-service rate of regular CFLs and the evaluation of LED lamps under the RMP. It notes that 96% of regular CFLs remain in service, and the savings value for LED lamps is based on assumptions due to lack of specific data.

ing the manufacturers’ specifications. To do so, Econoler consulted the website of participating retailers to investigate on the replacement scenario suggested for each LED model sold through the RMP. The analysis revealed that the average...

AI summary Econoler analyzed the RMP to determine the energy savings of LED lamps replacing CFLs. The analysis found that LEDs displaced 42.3 watts of equivalent wattage and calculated an annual savings of 41.7 kWh per unit based on average usage and wattage data.

42.3 2.7 365 41.7 1000 This adjusted value was used in this year’s evaluation to estimate the savings generated by the installation of LED lamps. 4.2.3 Dimmer Switches For dimmer switches, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 23.65 kWh per...

AI summary The document discusses the use of a unitary savings value of 23.65 kWh per year for dimmer switches, derived from the 2010 RMP evaluation report and based on the OPA report. The parameters used for the calculation are considered realistic by the Evaluator.

verage Lamp Wattage 242.6 W Old Operating Time 4.75 h/day New Operating Time – with Sensor 2.95 h/day Annual Savings 159.38 kWh Ref.: 5725 42 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation R...

AI summary The document discusses energy savings from outdoor motion sensors and power bars with integrated timers. It provides calculations based on assumptions about lamp wattage and operating time, and recommends continuing to use the unitary savings value of 159.38 kWh per year for outdoor motion sensors.

://www.energysavers.gov/your_home/water_heating/index.cfm/mytopic=13290 > The White River Valley Electric Cooperative: https://wrve.opower.com/ei/app/tip/tip122_reduce_pool_pump_run-time As the assumptions used in the calculations performe...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses energy savings from programmable thermostats and uses a unitary savings value of 63.15 kWh per year, derived from the OPA report. The savings are based on a 1% reduction for every degree setback from a standard electronic thermostat.

tors sold through the program. This value is based on the OPA report, using an annual energy consumption of 564.01 kWh for a standard refrigerator and 451.21 kWh for an ENERGY STAR refrigerator. At the beginning of 2011, the target for thi...

AI summary The Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) adjusted unitary savings values for refrigerators based on CEE Tier 3 ENERGY STAR models. The standard refrigerator's annual consumption was 564 kWh, while the new model's consumption was 334 kWh, resulting in a unitary savings of 230 kWh.

564 kWh New Annual Consumption – CEE Tier 3 Refrigerator 334 kWh Unitary Savings per Refrigerator 230 kWh As a result, Econoler adjusted the unitary savings value of 112.8 kWh used in the tracking sheet to a value of 230 kWh, taking into c...

AI summary Econoler adjusted unitary savings values for CEE Tier 3 ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers based on updated program targets and energy consumption data. The changes reflect more efficient models and updated evaluation methods.

s used for evaluating the savings resulting from the clothes washers sold through the spring and fall markdown campaigns as well as through the Air Miles pilot project. 4.2.11 Energy-to-Demand Ratio Econoler calculated the demand savings f...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy and demand savings from the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011, including calculations based on energy-to-demand ratios and revised unitary savings. It also includes gross savings estimates at both meter and generator levels, using a line loss factor provided by ENSC.

Table 44: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings Power Indoor Outdoor Heavy Prog. Tier 3 Tier 3 Regular Specialty LED Dimmer Bars Product Category Motion Motion Duty Thermo- Refrige- Clothes CFLs CFLs Lamps Switches with Sensor...

AI summary Table 44 presents evaluation results for net energy and demand savings across various product categories, including CFLs, LED lamps, and other energy-efficient devices. It includes metrics such as total gross energy savings, interactive effects factors, NTGR, and line loss factors for each category.

Tracked Savings from ENSC 1.690 MW 1.690 MW 1.690 MW 106% 1.793 MW Evaluation Results 2.269 MW 1.987 MW 1.745 MW 80% 1.388 MW The net evaluated savings fell short of those tracked by ENSC by approximately 23 percent. The difference between...

AI summary The net evaluated savings from ENSC programs fell short of tracked savings by 23%, primarily due to revised unitary savings values and the addition of replacement ratios and in-service rates. These changes were made to improve the accuracy of savings estimation for CFLs and other products.

service rate, based on the results from the CFL-buyer participant survey. The addition of these parameters allowed for a more precise estimation of the savings generated by regular CFLs. > Interactive effects factor: Interactive effects we...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), including adjustments to parameters like interactive effects and line loss factors. The Net Total Gross Reduction (NTGR) was re-evaluated for specific products, showing discrepancies between ENSC's estimates and Econoler's assessments.

5% 57% 69% 69% 61% 51% 54% Male 48 44 44 43 31 31 39 49 46 Ref.: 5725 72 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX III - INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Eva...

AI summary This document outlines an interview guide for evaluating the Retail Markdown Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions and comments related to implementation contractors, program partners, and the status of recommendations from the 2010 evaluation report, including those concerning CFLs, Tier 3 appliances, and year-round programs.

D IF NECESSARY] The program was formerly known as the “Power Down” program. Throughout the interview, I will refer to it as the “Retail Markdown” program. IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF RESPONDENT I1. According to our records, your compan...

AI summary The text discusses an interview process for evaluating the Retail Markdown Program, formerly known as the 'Power Down' program, conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia with the assistance of Econoler. The interview aims to gather information from a person knowledgeable about the program's product stocking and supply, specifically ENERGY STAR CFLs, refrigerators, and clothes washers.

ut the same, lower or higher? Same [SKIP TO C2b] Lower Higher [SKIP TO C2b] Don’t know [SKIP TO C3] Refused [SKIP TO C3] Ref.: 5725 84 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report C...

AI summary The text is a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks respondents about the impact of discounts on ENERGY STAR CFL sales during specific promotion periods, including projections for future sales.

[SINCE THE SECOND MARKDOWN PERIOD IS NOT OVER YET, ASK THE RESPONDENT TO ANSWER BASED ON A PROJECTION] RECORD PERCENTAGE _% [IF DIFFERENT FROM C2a, ASK WHY] Ref.: 5725 85 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...

AI summary The text is part of an evaluation report regarding the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It asks whether discounts on CFLs were provided during specific promotion periods and seeks details on the sources and values of these discounts.

program discounts, are there any other discounts provided on CFLs? Yes [GO TO C5a] No [GO TO C6] Don’t know [GO TO C6] Refused [GO TO C6] Ref.: 5725 86 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Ev...

AI summary The text asks whether there are other discounts on CFLs beyond program discounts and includes a form to collect information on who offers discounts and their values. It also asks about the influence of the Retail Markdown Program on various aspects of store operations related to CFLs.

Scale: c. The knowledge of consumers with regard to CFLs Scale: d. The variety of CFLs offered in your stores Scale: Ref.: 5725 87 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report C7. W...

AI summary The document includes questions about the sales of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) and ENERGY STAR refrigerators under the Retail Markdown Program, focusing on consumer knowledge, product variety, and sales projections during specific markdown periods.

Please answer using a scale where 0 means “Not at all influent” and where10 means” Very influent”. a. Your stores offer of ENERGY STAR clothes washers Scale: b. The knowledge of your salespersons with regard to Energy Star clothes washers...

AI summary The text presents a survey evaluating the impact of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program for ENERGY STAR clothes washers, including questions about sales, consumer knowledge, and program satisfaction.

s? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that you “Definitely Would Not Have Bought the CFLs” and a 10 indicating that you “Definitely Would Have Bought the CFLs.” _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused FR4a. And if you h...

AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer purchasing behavior related to CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) under a discount program. Respondents are asked about how the discount influenced their purchase quantity and timing.

orporation 2007 to 2011 Impact Evaluation Report 2 IMPACT EVALUATION 2.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the LHLE program from 2007 to 2011. To do s...

AI summary The impact evaluation of the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program from 2007 to 2011 assesses gross and net energy and demand savings. Econoler reviewed ENSC's unitary savings calculations, using an average value of 35.2 kWh per set of LED lights exchanged and a unitary peak demand of 176 W.

e, the unitary savings estimation of 241 kWh will be adjusted to the 69.5 kWh value calculated from the real data of the CFL torchieres installed through the LIR program. 4.2.3 LED Nightlights Based on a technical reference manual from the...

AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of unitary savings estimates for CFL torchieres and LED nightlights under the LIR program. The savings for CFL torchieres are revised based on real data, while LED nightlights are evaluated using assumptions from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's technical reference manual.

efore, the nightlights installed in rooms that are not affected by daylight are likely to remain 5 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, “Technical Reference Manual,” Pennsylvania, June 2011. Ref.: 5725 23 Efficient Products – Low Income...

AI summary The document discusses the energy savings from LED nightlights installed under the Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It calculates the unitary savings value based on displaced wattage and average operating time, using data from on-site visits and daylight exposure in Halifax.

deemed acceptable for most products promoted through ENSC programs. Therefore, the unitary savings value that is used in the current evaluation is 176.30 kWh per year. 4.2.6 Low-Flow Showerheads For low-flow showerheads, ENSC uses a unitar...

AI summary The unitary savings value for low-flow showerheads promoted through ENSC programs is 157 kWh, based on data from the OPA report and assumptions about flow rates, shower frequency, and temperature. This value is used to evaluate energy savings in the Low Income Renter Program.

minutes Average Shower Temperature 40°C (104°F) Annual Savings 377 kWh per household Econoler considers these parameters reliable and conservative. On its website, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) promotes the installation of low-flow show...

AI summary The document discusses energy savings from low-flow showerheads and power bars with integrated timers under the Low Income Renter Program. It references Natural Resources Canada and the Ontario Power Authority for savings estimates, using 377 kWh and 53 kWh as unitary savings values respectively.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 23: OPA Unitary Savings Estimate for Power Bars with Integrated Timer Entertainment Computer Parameters Lighting Others Centres Systems Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Aver...

AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the OPA Unitary Savings Estimate for Power Bars with Integrated Timer, including parameters like proportion, average wattage, operating time, and annual savings. It confirms the acceptability of these assumptions and notes the continued use of the unitary savings value in various programs.

stalled through the LIR program. This unitary savings value is also used in the ENSC Retail Markdown Program and the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter program. 4.2.8 Pipe Insulation The LIR program proposes the installatio...

AI summary The LIR program includes energy efficiency measures such as pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps for renters. ENSC uses unitary savings values based on past evaluations, including the 2009 Low Income Homeowner program and the OPA report. The savings values are adjusted based on pipe sizes commonly used in residential settings.

f 100 percent for this product. This result was confirmed during the telephone survey. Only one participant out of 70 revealed having removed one of their CFLs after their installation by the program. A significant level of removal was fou...

AI summary The evaluation of installed energy efficiency products found that most CFLs remained installed, but significant removal rates were observed for faucet aerators, LED nightlights, and power bars with timers. Econoler recommends increasing on-site visits to improve installation rates and ensure proper usage of products for energy savings.

essed in the future by ensuring that participants have received all the necessary information to use the timer and that they understand the necessity of using it to achieve the desired energy savings. In a few cases (low-flow showerheads,...

AI summary The report discusses the installation rates for energy-efficient products in the Low Income Renter (LIR) program, noting 100% installation rates for several items. It also details the energy-to-demand ratio used to calculate demand savings and provides revised gross savings for the program, both at the meter and generator levels.

Low-Flow 13 Watt 23 Watt CFL LED Seasonal Faucet Power Bars Pipe Hot Water Product Category Shower- CFLs CFLs Torchieres Nightlights LED lights Aerators with Timer Insulation Tank Wraps heads Energy Savings Number of units – 49,563 12,482...

AI summary The document presents data on energy savings from various low-flow and energy-efficient products installed across different categories, including CFLs, LED lights, faucet aerators, and pipe insulation. It includes metrics such as the number of units installed, energy savings at the meter and generator levels, and demand savings.

heating – Outdoor seasonal LED lights 71% × 40% = 28.4% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -17.4% For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, interactive effects of -100 percent are considered during the heating period in electr...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects factors for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, considering heating and cooling periods. During heating, a -100% interactive effect is assumed for electrically heated homes, while during cooling, a +100% interactive effect is assumed for homes with air conditioning. The weighted interactive effects factor for lighting products is calculated as -16.3% based on regional data.

t 241 kWh by ENSC, based on the Navigant study mentioned earlier. The assumptions used to estimate this value were not available. Therefore, Econoler based its review on other studies and assumptions. The average displaced wattage was esti...

AI summary The text discusses the estimation of unitary savings for CFL torchieres and LED nightlights. For CFL torchieres, the displaced wattage was calculated as 70.5 W, leading to an adjusted annual unitary savings of 69.5 kWh. For LED nightlights, a unitary savings value of 26 kWh is estimated based on a technical reference manual from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

100% - - - - 100% 100% 100% - - Total number of units installed 8,875 1,011 8 373 67 128 524 303 272 203 250 Unitary savings (kWh) 46.3 69.5 69.5 29.3 223 49 176.3 377 53 74 270 Total Gross Energy Savings 0.411 0.070 0.0006 0.011 0.015 0.0...

AI summary The text presents detailed energy savings data, including the number of units installed, unitary savings, and total gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, along with line loss factors and energy-to-demand ratios.

heet presented in the table below include the savings from the MURR program and the two additional pilot projects. Table 29: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Installed Gross Savings Initial Gross Installed with...

AI summary The evaluation results for energy and demand savings from the ENSC program show 6% higher savings than initially tracked. The difference is attributed to the revision or addition of parameters in the evaluation process.

on results were 6 percent higher than what was estimated by ENSC. The difference between the tracked and evaluated savings can be explained by the revision or the addition of the following parameters: > Unitary savings values: For several...

AI summary The evaluation of energy savings showed 6% higher results than ENSC's estimates, due to revised unitary savings values, inclusion of interactive effects factors, and a slight difference in NTGR. Adjustments were made for various products, including programmable thermostats, CFLs, and hot water tank wraps.

Program 1. Explain the nature of the energy audit: It is recommended that ENSC Manual designate the energy audit by its true nature (walk-through type audit) to avoid Content high expectations from renters and to be more specific in the de...

AI summary The document recommends clarifying the nature of energy audits conducted by ENSC, defining audit protocols, providing a 'base case' for calculating savings, and documenting parameters used to estimate program objectives, including distortion and interactive effects.

you provide information on what is their role in this program? This will help us to ask the appropriate question in the process evaluation survey. Q: Is there a reason why you selected 26 buildings? C: I understand that the energy audits w...

AI summary The text includes a series of questions and responses from an evaluation of the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Topics include program design, market transformation, energy savings calculations, and evaluation processes.

s at the generator for the EP-DI program combined with the savings for the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project amounted to 25.792 GWh for energy savings and 2.593 MW for demand savings in 2011. Ref.: 5725 vii Efficient Products – Direc...

AI summary The evaluation report compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program and the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project in 2011. Combined energy savings amounted to 25.792 GWh and demand savings to 2.593 MW, with a combined net-to-generator ratio (NTGR) of 0.95.

11. These targets exclude savings for the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project. The EP-DI program generated net electricity savings of 25.23 GWh in 2010 and 39.52 GWh for 2008 and 2009 combined. Ref.: 5725 2 Efficient Products – Direct...

AI summary The text discusses the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program's electricity savings and evaluation methodology. It excludes savings from the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project and outlines the program's logic model and research strategy for the 2011 evaluation.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.4 PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION Following the analysis of all program elements, and with the most up-to-date information about the program background and tools, the Evaluator...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report concludes that the EP-DI program is appropriate for the market, especially for small businesses that have not participated in energy efficiency programs due to various barriers. The program was upgraded in 2011, expanding its target market and product offerings.

e location where the measure is implemented be collected by the DA for all buildings since savings can differ depending on whether measures are installed in common areas or in individual renter units. For each eligible product, a unitary s...

AI summary The document discusses how energy savings from efficient products, such as 13 W CFLs, are calculated based on installation location and usage patterns. Unitary savings values are applied depending on whether the product is installed in non-residential or residential buildings, with specific values adjusted for the 2011 evaluation.

nitary savings value of 127 kWh per 13 W CFL installed in a non-residential building and 41 kWh per 13 W CFL installed in a residential building. These two values were revised for the 2011 evaluation. 13 W CFLs Installed in Non-Residential...

AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings value for 13 W CFLs installed in non-residential and residential buildings, referencing evaluations from 2010 and 2011. It also outlines the calculation of displaced wattage based on data from tracking sheets and the average wattage of old incandescent bulbs.

270.0 1000 The EP-DI 2011 impact evaluation revised the unitary savings value used for 23 W CFLs to Ref.: 5725 29 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 270.0 kWh per year. 23...

AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program revises the unitary savings value for 23 W CFLs installed in residential buildings, based on displaced wattage and adjusted hours of operation. The displaced wattage was calculated as 70.5W, and the daily usage was adjusted to 2.7 hours based on a metering study.

ucing the standby power consumption of electronic devices plugged into the power bar. Table 19 presents the data used by the OPA to calculate the unitary savings for power bars with integrated timer. Table 19: Unitary Savings Calculation f...

AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings calculation for power bars with integrated timers, as calculated by the Ontario Power Authority. These power bars account for a small portion of the Efficient Products – Direct Install program's total savings, leading to no site visits being conducted for this category.

2011 Evaluation Report category of product. Thus, no information was collected on the devices installed on the power bars. The type of devices plugged into the power bars and their hours of operation in facilities eligible for the EP-DI pr...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the use of unitary savings values for energy efficiency programs, specifically for power bars with timers and hot water tank wraps. It notes that data collection was limited and recommends on-site visits for more accurate evaluations in future reports.

2.10 Lodging 1.74 Average Annual Savings 1.80 Hot Water Tank Volume The OPA report shows the hot water tank volume for different types of commercial facilities. The average hot water tank size based on this information is 380 L (100 gal)....

AI summary The document discusses the discrepancy between the average hot water tank volume reported by the OPA and data from on-site visits. It highlights that the OPA's average is based on a larger dataset, while on-site visits showed smaller tanks. The EP-DI program does not set a minimum tank size for insulation, and the Evaluator recommends collecting more detailed data on tank volumes for better energy savings estimates.

at the facility before the retrofit and inquire on the use of manual nighttime setback with the old thermostat. 4.2.9 Programmable Thermostats for Individual Rental Units of Multi-Unit Buildings For programmable thermostats, ENSC uses a un...

AI summary The document discusses the use of programmable thermostats in multi-unit buildings, referencing a unitary savings value of 63.15 kWh per year derived from the OPA report. Econoler revised this value based on the Retail Markdown program evaluation, questioning the 1% savings per degree setback from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.11 Dishwasher Spray Valves For dishwasher spray valves, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 2,500 kWh per year. This value is based on two studies conducted by Veritec Consulti...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses energy savings from dishwasher spray valves and LED PAR lamps. ENSC uses an average savings value of 2,500 kWh/year for dishwasher spray valves based on studies from Calgary and Waterloo. For the Retail LED Direct Install pilot, 254 installations used 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps with savings values of 244 kWh and 292 kWh, respectively.

s. A total of 254 installations were conducted under the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project. Unitary savings values of 244 kWh and 292 kWh are used for 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps, respectively. These unitary savings are calculated ba...

AI summary The Retail LED Direct Install pilot project conducted 254 installations using 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps, with unitary savings values of 244 kWh and 292 kWh, respectively. These savings were based on replacing 70 W and 90 W halogen lamps and adjusting for actual replacements. The total gross energy savings for the project was 4.27 GWh.

ion rate was considered to be 100 percent since no on-site visit was conducted for these categories. Moreover, no adjustment for the installation rate is applied to the savings for the pilot project. Ref.: 5725 42 Efficient Products – Dire...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses the calculation of energy and demand savings for the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program. It outlines the energy-to-demand ratio used and the revised gross savings, both at the meter and generator levels, incorporating a line loss factor provided by Nova Scotia Power.

survey campaigns conducted by ENSC, and from each participant of the EP-DI program. This would provide for a better evaluation of the interactive effects factors. Ref.: 5725 55 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Sc...

AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program discusses energy costs as a percentage of annual operating budgets, noting that 18% was the average for two-thirds of respondents, with over half reporting less than 20%.

ever) 3 (At the same time) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2cc ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ: Would it have been within . . . 1. Less than 6 months? 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later 3. 1 to less th...

AI summary The text is part of an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It includes survey questions about customer responses to the program, including whether they would have installed energy-efficient products without the program and the importance of various factors in their decision.

h interviews with the Program Manager (PM) and four delivery agents and energy auditors as well as on two on-site visits, 25 participant simulations and a telephone survey of 70 program participants. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The EEH program provid...

AI summary The EEH program provides financial incentives to homeowners for energy efficiency improvements. It includes pre- and post-retrofit audits, uses a simulation tool (HOT2000), and collaborates with Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan).

xisting Houses (EEH) program encourages homeowners in Nova Scotia (NS) to improve the energy efficiency (EE) of their house. The program also extends to small multi-unit residential buildings (MURBs). The program provides incentives from E...

AI summary The EEH program in Nova Scotia encourages homeowners and small multi-unit residential buildings to improve energy efficiency through incentives. It uses DSM ratepayer funding and provincial taxpayer funds for different aspects of the program. The program initially partnered with NRCan’s ecoENERGY Retrofit Homes program, which ended in 2010 but was later reinstated in 2011, with a deadline for participation set for 2012.

t receives $55 to install the tank and pipe wraps, and $30 for installing the bulbs. ENSC would like that the Certified Energy Advisors reach an amount of at least $60 of installed products per house. The Direct Install Plus pilot project...

AI summary The EEH program targets existing homes in Nova Scotia, offering incentives for energy-efficient products. ENSC aims for Certified Energy Advisors to install at least $60 worth of products per house. The Direct Install Plus pilot includes additional products like electric kettles and faucet aerators. HOT2000 is a residential energy analysis software used for EnerGuide ratings.

e, the content of all program manuals should be standardized based on the same template so that it is easier to locate specific sections or subjects. 3.3 PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler has reviewed the content of the tracking sheet for th...

AI summary The document discusses the need for standardizing program manuals and highlights the EEH program's tracking sheet, noting its usefulness but suggesting improvements. It also mentions that the Evaluator did not review the DSMDS system due to ongoing updates.

Demand Side Management Data System (DSMDS). At the time of writing this report, ENSC was working on the DSMDS to make it more accessible and to ensure that the information it contains is up to date. Ref.: 5725 12 EnerGuide for Existing Hou...

AI summary The report discusses the Demand Side Management Data System (DSMDS) and the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. ENSC is working to improve the accessibility and accuracy of the DSMDS. The EnerGuide program uses data from HOT2000 simulations and energy savings figures derived from previous evaluations to calculate gross savings.

am: existing houses and small multi-unit residential buildings (MURB). The PM ought to include this information in the tracking sheet to follow program development for each project type. > Create fields for building energy consumption data...

AI summary The text discusses improvements to the tracking sheet for energy efficiency programs, including the inclusion of building energy consumption data and systematic data entry processes. It also highlights the EEH program as a well-designed initiative with multiple funding sources, including NRCan, ENSC, and the Province of NS.

the program, the program partners believe that ENSC and the Province should increase funding to compensate for the loss of federal funds and add new rebates for additional insulation and air sealing. The most important barrier identified b...

AI summary Program partners suggest increasing funding for ENSC and the Province to compensate for lost federal funds and introduce new rebates for insulation and air sealing. Key barriers include uncertainty about program continuation, lack of awareness, and insufficient incentives. EAs recommend refining the HOT2000 software and adjusting rebate levels to better reflect energy savings.

% 41% 43% No 57 46 54 Don’t know 9 0 3 Fifty percent of respondents were unable to offer any recommendations for improving the EEH program. Among respondents who suggested program improvements, 14 percent mentioned offering more informatio...

AI summary Fifty percent of respondents could not recommend improvements to the EEH program. Among those who did, 14% suggested more information on recommended measures, 9% wanted more time for implementation, and others suggested increasing rebates, expanding eligible measures, and improving communication.

rom prescriptive measures are necessary to calculate program gross savings. The methodology for evaluating these elements is described in the following sections. 4.2.1 Savings per EnerGuide Point In 2011, ENSC calculated a portion of the p...

AI summary The document discusses the methodology used by ENSC in 2011 to calculate energy savings per EnerGuide point, referencing a 1,047 kWh figure from the 2010 EEH program evaluation report. Econoler later sampled 25 projects to estimate and calibrate these savings using billing information.

rage and thus has over-influenced the regression analysis (it increased the R of the regressions analysis by 10%). Consequently, Econoler decided not to include this value in the regression analysis. Ref.: 5725 38 EnerGuide for Existing Ho...

AI summary The analysis found that the HOT2000 simulation overestimates building energy consumption, which affects the accuracy of energy savings calculations. Econoler excluded a value that increased the regression analysis' R by 10% due to its over-influence.

No modification Solar DHW Reduction of electricity consumption (if electrical space heating) In conclusion, four prescriptive measures have to be evaluated separately from the EnerGuide point analysis. Their gross savings will be calculate...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from prescriptive measures, including solar DHW and drain water heat recovery systems. It references the EnerGuide program and the OPA report, which provides unitary savings values based on assumptions about shower usage and system efficiency.

y. For its calculations, the OPA, however, considered a high use case. Accordingly, the shower rate was assumed to be three per day, eight minutes per shower. The estimated shower flow was 6.5 liters Ref.: 5725 41 EnerGuide for Existing Ho...

AI summary The OPA used a high-use scenario for shower calculations, estimating 6.5 liters per minute flow and 8 minutes per shower. It calculated 816 kWh of annual electricity savings per unit for drain water heat recovery systems, based on the 2011 EnerGuide report. ENSC applied a similar value for its 2011 impact calculations.

itary savings value for this measure as that used for the DWHR units with more than 42 percent efficiency; i.e., 816 kWh per year for each installed system. Electric hot water heater pipe insulation The EEH program proposes the installatio...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency savings values for various residential programs, including electric hot water heater pipe insulation and tank wraps. These values are based on evaluations from the EEH program, Low Income program, and OPA reports, with Econoler selecting the most reliable and consistent figures for use in their analysis.

ssumptions used by the OPA to estimate this unitary savings value are clear, well documented and reliable, Econoler decided to use the unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for this evaluation. Ref.: 5725 42 EnerGuide for Existing Hous...

AI summary The OPA provided a unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, which Econoler accepted as reliable. For programmable thermostats, ENSC uses a value of 63.15 kWh per year, based on the OPA's calculation of 1% savings per degree setback. A Hydro-Québec evaluation is referenced for thermostat accuracy and setback savings.

temperature set back, the savings per housing resulted from a billing analysis regression which compared the consumption of houses with electronic thermostats and houses with programmable thermostats. As the unitary savings value of 63.15...

AI summary Econoler evaluated the savings from programmable thermostats in Nova Scotia, considering data from Hydro-Québec and field data from the EP-DI program. They adjusted savings estimates based on housing types and assumed most participants lived in single-detached homes, leading to an estimated unitary savings of 221 kWh per year.

timated the total unitary savings value associated with the installation of a programmable thermostat at 221 kWh per year. This latter figure was used in the EEH program impact evaluation for 2011. 14 Hydro-Québec – Laboratoire des technol...

AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings value for programmable thermostats and solar DHW systems under the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It references Hydro-Québec and the OPA report for data on energy savings and usage patterns.

llation of faucet aerators. Table 28: Unitary Savings Estimate for Faucet Aerators from Other Jurisdictions Annual Unitary Savings Source 176.30 kWh OPA 159.1 kWh Wisconsin Focus on Energy Evaluation23 The annual unitary savings value pres...

AI summary The document presents unitary savings estimates for faucet aerators based on studies from other jurisdictions. It uses the OPA's value of 176.30 kWh per year, considering the average savings from multiple faucets and the relevance of a Canadian comparison for ENSC programs.

ll be used in the current evaluation is 176.30 kWh per year. 23 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Focus on Energy Evaluation, conducted by PA Consulting Group, Final Report, June 24, 2008. Ref.: 5725 50 EnerGuide for Existing Houses...

AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program uses a unitary savings value of 157 kWh for low-flow showerheads, based on a Navigant study. However, Econoler relied on other data sources, including an OPA report, which estimates annual savings of 377 kWh per household under specific assumptions.

minutes Average Shower Temperature 40°C (104°F) Annual Savings 377 kWh per household Econoler considers these parameters reliable and conservative. On its website, NRCan promotes the installation of low-flow showerheads24. NRCan specifies...

AI summary The document discusses energy savings from low-flow showerheads and pipe insulation, referencing Natural Resources Canada and the Office of the Public Advocate. It highlights an annual savings of 377 kWh per household and the use of a unitary savings value per showerhead.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Demand Savings The demand savings of the EEH program are calculated using two different considerations. Firstly, Econoler calculated the demand savings for the EEH program usi...

AI summary The demand savings for the EEH program are calculated using an energy-to-demand ratio of 3.64 GWh/MW and include additional savings from electric thermal storage (ETS) units installed in residential buildings.

ETS central hydronic systems and ETS room units. Econoler added the demand savings generated through the installation of ETS units to the demand savings calculated using the energy-to-demand ratio25. For the first two ETS units (forced air...

AI summary Econoler challenges the demand savings estimates proposed by ENSC for ETS systems, arguing that the values are not conservative and do not account for diversity factors in heating system operation.

TS units installed on central heating systems (either forced air furnaces or central hydronic systems), Econoler therefore assumed the unitary peak demand savings for the latter ETS units to be 10 kW. Regarding the ETS room units, Econoler...

AI summary Econoler estimated annual demand savings for different ETS units, assuming 10 kW for forced air furnaces and central hydronic systems, and 4 kW per room unit, up to 10 kW per project. These calculations were used to revise gross savings for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, incorporating a line loss factor of 10.5% provided by NSPI.

For the calculation of savings at the generator level, Econoler used a line loss factor of 10.5 percent, which takes into account transmission and distribution losses. This value was provided by NSPI. Taking everything into account, the 20...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program in 2011, using a line loss factor of 10.5 percent provided by NSPI. The estimated gross energy savings are 6.740 GWh at the meter and 7.447 GWh at the generator, with peak demand savings of 2.140 MW and 2.364 MW respectively.

3 69.5 Total Gross Energy Savings – 4.521 0.001 0.002 0.071 0.181 0.427 0.044 0.758 0.100 at Meter (GWh) Line Loss Factor 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 Total Gross Energy Savings – 4.995 0.001 0.003 0.079 0.200 0.47...

AI summary The text provides numerical data on energy and demand savings related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including gross energy savings at meter and generator levels, line loss factors, and energy-to-demand ratios, with additional notes on the calculation methodology and an acronym definition.

per EnerGuide point. The unitary savings value shown in this column is the savings per EnerGuide point figure calculated through the EEH program impact evaluation. DWHR: Drain Water Heat Recovery Ref.: 5725 55 EnerGuide for Existing Houses...

AI summary This text discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and its evaluation by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on unitary savings values calculated through the EEH program impact evaluation and referencing Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR).

Energy savings for hot water tank wraps were calculated only when there was no electrical space heating and when the water heating system was electric. For the participants who had not received a D audit report, the Evaluator calculated en...

AI summary The text discusses energy savings calculations for hot water tank wraps and the distribution of energy-efficient products across various categories. It includes data on the number of units from different programs and installation projects.

PM should target projects with outlier values, such as an initial EnerGuide rating below 20 or an increase of the EnerGuide rating by more than 40 points. 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implement...

AI summary The text discusses the EEH program's approach to identifying outlier projects based on EnerGuide ratings and the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, such as the impact of replacing lighting with CFLs or LEDs on heating and cooling loads. An interactive effects factor of -43.8 percent was used in the evaluation.

out Air Conditioning 13% x 82% = 11% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -43.8% For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the EEH program and the Direct Install pilot project, interactive effects of -100 percen...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects for water pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the EEH program and Direct Install pilot project. It considers a -100% interactive effect during heating periods in electrically heated homes and +100% during cooling periods in homes with air conditioning. A weighted interactive effects factor of -48.3% was calculated based on heating and cooling degree-days for Halifax.

Savings per DWHR DWHR Program- Pipe Tank Solar 13 Watt 23 Watt Product Category EnerGuide (eff. = 30% (eff. ≥ mable CFLs CFLs Insulation Wraps DHW Point to 42%) 42%) thermostats Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at 4.521 0.001 0....

AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings and demand savings for various products and programs, including EnerGuide, DWHR, and CFLs. It includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factors, and NTGR. The data is analyzed at both the meter and generator levels.

tor compared the net energy savings values calculated in the previous table with the EEH program tracked net savings for 2011. The next table details the final evaluated and tracked impacts for 2011. Table 34: Comparison of Tracked and Eva...

AI summary The evaluated net energy savings for the EEH program in 2011 are approximately 25% lower than the tracked savings, primarily due to adjustments in gross energy savings per EnerGuide point and updated national studies. Econoler also made adjustments to savings from pilot projects, with Direct Install Plus showing slightly higher savings due to changes in unitary savings for aerator and CFL bulb installations.

nstall Plus). Noteworthy is that the Direct Install Plus evaluated savings were slightly higher than ENSC’s as a result of an increase in unitary savings related to aerator and CFL bulb installations. Another reason to explain the drop in...

AI summary The Direct Install Plus program's evaluated energy savings were slightly higher than ENSC's due to increased unitary savings from aerator and CFL bulb installations. The drop in net energy savings is attributed to interactive effects from energy-efficient lighting and insulation measures. The NTGR decreased from 0.76 to 0.70, influenced by changes in free-ridership evaluation methods. Econoler adjusted ENSC's demand savings calculations, reducing them by over 35%.

multi-unit residential buildings (MURB). The PM ought to include this information in the tracking sheet to follow program development for each project type. Ref.: 5725 68 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpora...

AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program tracking sheet, including adding fields for building energy consumption data and ensuring systematic data entry to improve accuracy and completeness of energy savings calculations.

all or some of the measures recommended in the audit, knowing that there will be incentives to cover some of these measures from different sources. 7 Depending on the nature of the Track record of payments for electricity measures paid mea...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency (EE) measures and the various incentives available from different organizations. It highlights that ENSC provides incentives for electric heating measures, while the provincial government and NRCan offer incentives for envelope and pre-approved measures, respectively. The text also emphasizes the importance of monitoring double counting of savings and using participant statistics as performance indicators.

F 16 : What is the status for this finding? Page 1 C: As I understand it, there are 3 sources of incentives. (NRCan, ENSC and the Provincial Government. This is somewhat difficult to track? Page 2 Q: Multi-unit residential buildings where...

AI summary The text discusses challenges with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including the difficulty of tracking incentives from multiple sources, concerns about program management and consistency, and confusion over rebate calculations and financing options. Questions are raised about the accuracy of consumption and savings estimates and the clarity of program guidelines.

ase? C: In the Enroll in the Program section, Step five (maximum building envelope rebate and the section about the multiplier) is difficult to understand but is well explained in the program manual. C: A process flow chart could help the...

AI summary The text discusses challenges with the Enroll in the Program section, particularly the complexity of incentives, maximums, and the involvement of multiple organizations. Participants request clarification on how savings are calculated and whether incentives can overlap for a single measure.

icient) 2. (That improvements would cost a lot) 3. (Rebates would be too low / insufficient) 4. (That the audit wouldn’t find anything / my home was too efficient) Ref.: 5725 101 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...

AI summary The text outlines reasons for dissatisfaction with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including high costs, low rebate amounts, and concerns about the audit process and recommendations. It also includes a satisfaction survey with options for rating the program experience.

current energy use and recommendations for energy efficient upgrades 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 f. The Final Energy Audit Overall (This was the final audit of your home's energy use to confirm the energy efficient upgrades that you had installed.) 1...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on customer satisfaction with energy audits and rebate provisions. It highlights dissatisfaction with the audit process and the need for feedback on specific issues.

like to have covered by the program? PROBE: Anything else? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC UPGRADES; ACCEPT MULTIPLE] 1 2 3 Ref.: 5725 112 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report RECOMMENDATIONS...

AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including offering more eligible products, improving communication, and advertising the program more effectively. It also asks participants whether a visual guide would have facilitated their participation in the program.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Provide the parameters used to estimate the objectives: After estimating the gross savings from the base case established in the manual, the objectives are then forecast in terms...

AI summary The document discusses the methodology for estimating objectives and tracking pilot savings for ENSC’s Fuel Substitution Pilot. It outlines the use of parameters based on past evaluations and market intelligence, and highlights the utility of a tracking sheet for monitoring applications and energy savings.

d for this particular project, the latter was not considered for the remainder of the impact evaluation. Table 17 presents the number of projects completed for each type of heating system installed. Table 17: Total Number of Projects Compl...

AI summary The text discusses the distribution of heating system installations and their energy savings, highlighting that most systems were wood and pellet stoves. Despite fewer installations, pellet and natural gas furnace or boiler systems required on-site visits. Preferred regions for site selection include Halifax, Dartmouth, Sydney, Coldbrook, Kentville, and Pictou County.

Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 2.741 GWh 0.47 1.300 GWh Evaluation Results 2.707 GWh 0.58 1.570 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 1.371MW 0.47 0.641 MW Evaluation Results 1.353 MW 0.58 0....

AI summary The text compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings for 2011, highlighting discrepancies between the NTGR values used in tracking and evaluation. Net energy savings are estimated at 1.570 GWh, and demand savings at 0.785 MW, with differences attributed to varying NTGR calculations.

an be explained by the difference between the NTGR calculated for this evaluation and the one applied by the PM to tracked savings. The NTGR value in the tracked savings varied from 1 for natural gas Ref.: 5725 25 Fuel Substitution Pilot P...

AI summary The text discusses discrepancies in the NTGR (Net Total Gross Savings) values used in the evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. The NTGR varied between 1 and 0.23 for different systems, compared to the 0.58 value used in the evaluation.

the electrical system (if efficiency purposes. applicable) and proceeds with the acquisition, installation and inspection of the new energy system. 11 The Heritage Gas rebate contributes to Data from Heritage Gas related to rebates increas...

AI summary The text discusses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlighting benefits such as cost savings for participants, reduced electricity generation, and decreased greenhouse gas emissions. It also notes the use of local resources like wood and pellets, contributing to energy self-sufficiency in the province.

did you convert to gas while or after converting your heating system to gas? PROBE: Anything else? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT. DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE; 98 = DK, 99 = REFUSED] 1. (Stove) 2. (Clothes dryer) 3. (Other kitchen applianc...

AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Fuel Substitution Program, asking participants about their conversion to gas equipment, timing of decisions, and connection to gas utility networks, as well as the impact of energy conservation measures on energy bills.

of the savings achieved thanks to the prescriptive measures implemented through the program and the related pilot project. Table 2: 2011 Program Unitary Savings Adjustments Unitary Savings Values (kWh/year) Products Tracked Evaluated 13 W...

AI summary The text discusses unitary savings values for various products under a program, comparing tracked and evaluated savings in kWh/year. It highlights significant differences, such as dehumidifier replacements and faucet aerators showing large increases in evaluated savings.

noler finally adjusted the savings per EnerGuide point value (817 kWh per year) in relation with the percentage of the space heating load delivered by electricity for each participant. 4.2.2 CFLs ENSC used the same unitary savings value of...

AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of energy savings values for CFLs and EnerGuide points. It outlines how ENSC used a unitary savings value of 41 kWh for all CFLs based on past evaluations and how Econoler revised this value for different CFL categories. The analysis also considers the replacement of incandescent bulbs and daily usage patterns.

igerators was obtained from the metering activity conducted at the recycling facility to measure the consumption of the old refrigerators retired through the ARet program. 4.2.13 Freezer Retirements The Low Income program promoted the reti...

AI summary The document discusses the retirement of inefficient freezers through the Low Income program and ARet program, noting that ENSC used a unitary savings figure of 705 kWh per year, while Econoler estimated 1,274 kWh per year based on consumption data from the ARet program recycling facility.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.18 Energy-to-Demand Ratio Econoler calculated the demand savings for the Low Income program based on an energy-to-demand ratio of 4.68 GWh/MW. This ratio was obtained from the a...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the calculation of demand savings for the Low Income program using an energy-to-demand ratio of 4.68 GWh/MW. It also presents revised gross savings for the program, including energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, using a line loss factor of 1.050 provided by ENSC.

Dehumi- Hot New Fridge Freezer Fridge Freezer Low-Flow difier Faucet Pipe Water Product Category Repla- Dehumi- Repla- Repla- Retire- Retire- Aerators Shower- Insulation Tank difiers cement cement ment ment heads cement Wraps Energy Saving...

AI summary The document provides data on energy savings from various products and programs, including dehumidifiers, fridges, freezers, low-flow faucets, shower heads, and pipe insulation. It includes metrics such as the number of units installed, energy savings in kWh, and total gross energy savings in GWh.

Table 30: Evaluation Results – Gross and Net Savings Savings Program- Flush- CFL LED Power per 13 Watt 23 Watt Specialty CFL Tor- mable Electric Product Category EnerGuide CFLs CFLs CFLs Mount Porch chieres Night- Thermos- Kettles Bars wit...

AI summary The table presents evaluation results for energy savings across various product categories, including gross and net energy savings measured in GWh. It also includes factors such as the Interactive Effects Factor and NTGR, which influence the net savings calculations.

rgy and demand savings were higher than those calculated by ENSC. The difference between the tracked and evaluated results can be explained by the revision or the addition of the following parameters: > Unitary savings values: For several...

AI summary The document discusses discrepancies between tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings, attributing the differences to revised unitary savings values for various products, including programmable thermostats, faucet aerators, and CFLs, as well as downward revisions for some other measures. The impact of these changes on the overall realization rate is noted.

should ensure that the DAs have sufficient staff and a protocol in place that would allow ensuring that all final audits are completed within a short period after the measures are implemented. Ref.: 5725 58 Low Income Program Efficiency No...

AI summary The text discusses the selection of delivery agents (DAs) by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) to ensure program protocol adherence and quality control. It also highlights the need for DAs to train energy auditors in the use of simulation software and energy audit procedures.

on). This way of calculating savings would be more tailored to the reality of each building than by using an average savings per EnerGuide point for all program participants. PP-R4. Revise HOT2000 models on a random basis: The Evaluator or...

AI summary The text discusses revisions to the HOT2000 models and the inclusion of a percentage of heating delivered by electricity in ENSC's tracking sheets to improve the accuracy of energy savings calculations. It also mentions the need for random model reviews and detailed records from energy advisors.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Several types of incentives are provided through the program. As mentioned above, the builder or the homeowner needs to send a payment of $250 to have the initial evaluation of the...

AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation program offers various incentives for energy-efficient home improvements, including initial evaluations and rebates based on EnerGuide ratings. In 2011, the program had 701 participants and aimed for 2.60 GWh of electricity savings and 0.79 MW of demand savings.

ary demand savings per electric thermal storage (ETS) system installed. The next sections detail the gross savings calculations for each of these four features. 4.2.1 Energy Savings Calculation The next sections present the three key featu...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings under the Performance Plus program, focusing on the EnerGuide baseline for new houses. The baseline was adjusted from 73 to 80 in 2010 to align with updated building codes, and further studies in 2011 were conducted to refine this value for more accurate energy savings calculations.

ivering heating throughout the year. In contrast, ENSC did not claim savings when the main heat source was not electricity (oil, natural gas, etc.), even though the backup heating system was electric. For the 2011 Performance Plus program...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2011 Performance Plus program used energy savings coefficients from the 2011 EEH program. Econoler analyzed 23 EEH projects and found an average energy savings of 1,089 kWh per EnerGuide point, which was used as the basis for energy savings computation.

a result, this last percentage was used to lower the evaluated average savings per EnerGuide point (1,089 kWh) previously defined. This yielded a final value of 817 kWh of savings per EnerGuide point. With regard to the fact that ENSC clai...

AI summary ENSC's assumption of 100% savings for houses with electric heating and no savings for others may overestimate program impacts. Econoler evaluated this using tracking data, finding that only a small number of non-electric-heated homes had secondary electric heating systems. ENSC also calculated prescriptive measure savings from the 2010 Performance Plus program evaluation.

mation). This way of calculating the savings would be more tailored to the reality of each building than by using an average savings per EnerGuide point for all program participants. > Revise HOT2000 models on a random basis: The Evaluator...

AI summary The text discusses improving the accuracy of energy savings calculations in efficiency programs by tailoring methods to individual buildings, validating HOT2000 models, and adjusting for the percentage of heating delivered by electricity. These changes aim to reduce uncertainty and improve the representativeness of savings claims.

Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides financial incentives, in the form of prescriptive rebates, to commercial and industri...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in Nova Scotia provides financial incentives to commercial and industrial clients to reduce energy consumption and demand. Launched in 2010, the program aims to increase the use of energy-efficient products and technologies, with a goal of achieving 21.80 GWh in electricity savings by 2011.

e net electricity savings of 21.80 GWh in 2011. In 2010, the BER program generated net electricity savings of 0.503 GWh. Eligible Measures The prescribed measures are divided into seven categories: > Lighting Fixtures & Lamps; > Occupancy...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program generated 0.503 GWh of net electricity savings in 2010 and 21.80 GWh in 2011. The program allows eligible commercial customers to apply for rebates on energy-efficient products, which are categorized into seven types, including lighting, HVAC systems, and compressed air equipment.

ned primarily from the following four sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation report; > program manual; > tracking sheet. 2.2.2 In-Depth Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff conducted one interview in September with the Program...

AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates program involved reviewing documentation, conducting interviews with the Program Manager, on-site visits to verify implemented measures, and surveying 43 participants. The process aimed to assess program effectiveness, barriers, and participant experiences.

sselaer Polytechnic Institute (Bill VonNeaida, Dorene Maniccia, Allan Tweed), An analysis of the energy and cost savings potential of occupancy sensors for commercial lighting systems (August 2000). Ref.: 5725 9 Business Energy Rebates Pro...

AI summary The text discusses the need to reorganize the database structure for the Business Energy Rebates Program to allow for systematic validation of energy savings calculations. It suggests separating values like wattage and SEER into individual cells while retaining detailed equations for flexibility.

lculate the energy savings for this program, it is useful to keep the detailed equation in the tracking sheet, as the savings calculation parameters can vary from one project to another. > Include measure sub-categories for categories with...

AI summary The text discusses improvements to program evaluation processes, emphasizing the need to track detailed savings calculations and break down address information for easier site selection. It highlights the importance of including measure sub-categories for accurate savings calculations and simplifying address data entry.

of total savings. Thus, the remaining seven sites to be sampled, after the selection based on technology, were allocated to lighting measures, for a total of eight on-site visits for this category. Table 17: Energy Savings per Category for...

AI summary The document outlines energy savings data categorized by type, including lighting, HVAC, and refrigeration, with a focus on sampling sites in regions near major city centres. The Business Energy Rebates Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation are highlighted in the context of a 2011 evaluation report.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For lighting measures, energy savings varied from 336 kWh to 1,087,932 kWh per site. In order to include both sites with significant energy savings and sites with lower energy savin...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses energy savings from lighting measures, stratifying sites based on energy savings. It outlines an on-site visit protocol for data collection and describes the methodology for calculating gross savings from completed projects in the BER program.

ds increasing the number of on-site visits conducted for this category of measures in order to obtain adjustment values that could be applied to all projects in this category. 4.2.2 HVAC Measures Savings calculations are based on efficienc...

AI summary The document discusses adjustments made to energy and demand savings calculations for HVAC measures based on findings from a single on-site visit. The visit revealed discrepancies in system usage, leading to reductions in both energy and demand savings for the category.

the number of on-site visits conducted for this category of measures should be increased in order to obtain adjustment values that could be applied to all projects. 4.2.5 Refrigeration Measures Average values are used for heat gains, while...

AI summary The document discusses the need for increased on-site visits for refrigeration measures to obtain adjustment values and improve savings evaluation. It also addresses the diversity factor and peak demand periods in Nova Scotia, recommending the use of the 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. timeframe for evaluation.

responds to the weighted average of these values. The diversity factor values obtained for each category are presented in Table 18. Table 18: Diversity Factors 2011 Category of Measures Diversity Factor Compressed air systems 99.4% HVAC sy...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of revised gross savings for the BER program, including the use of diversity factors and line-loss factors to estimate energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels. The savings for each category of measures are presented in Table 19.

Table 19: Evaluation Results – Revised Gross Savings Lighting Measures Motor and Compressed HVAC Laundry For Non- For Occupancy Refrigeration Measure Category Drives Air Systems Systems Systems refrigerated Refrigeration Sensors Systems Sy...

AI summary This table presents the evaluation results for revised gross savings under various lighting and energy measures, including compressed air systems, HVAC systems, and refrigeration systems. It details total program tracking savings, demand savings, energy savings adjustments, and line loss factors across different categories.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically how replacing regular lighting with efficient lighting and installing occupancy sensors in the BER program affects heating and cooling loads. A -7.7% interactive effects factor was applied, based on a 1992 study by ADS for Hydro-Québec using DOE2 software simulations on electrically heated buildings.

ec in order to determine the impact of these changes on heating and cooling systems. The simulations were performed with the DOE2 software and only focused on buildings heated entirely by electricity. The following table presents the calcu...

AI summary This section discusses the use of DOE2 software to simulate the impact of energy efficiency changes on heating and cooling systems in electrically heated buildings. It also outlines data collection methods and recommendations for improving future evaluations of interactive effects factors.

t was applied on savings for the lighting category. The evaluator recommends increasing the number of on-site visits conducted for this category of measures in order to obtain adjustment values that could be applied to all projects in this...

AI summary The text discusses recommendations to increase on-site visits for energy efficiency measures in lighting, HVAC, and motors and drives categories to improve accuracy in savings calculations and reduce overestimation risks.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q: Please describe who are the program partners and what are their roles. This should guide us in asking the appropriate questions in the process evaluation. (Sales leads, marketing...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions for evaluating the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including inquiries about program partners, design considerations, barriers, evaluation plans, marketing strategies, and database usability. It also includes an interview guide for participants in the program evaluation.

A5 = HVAC; THEN ASK VA9 FIRST TIME THROUGH THEN NOT AGAIN IF THE ANSWER IS NO. IF THE ANSWER IN VA9 IS YES, REPEAT VA7/VA8 FOR EVERY OTHER MEASURE CATEGORY IN SAMPLE THAT HAS BEEN VERIFIED IN VA1-VA5 VA7. What ONE factor was most important...

AI summary The text outlines a survey process to determine factors motivating companies and organizations to install energy-efficient equipment, with specific focus on HVAC and other measure categories. It includes a list of potential motivations, such as program rebates, energy cost savings, and recommendations from utility representatives.

if several types are encountered per OCC, indicate each type (On site validation): Number – Lamps controlled by OCC; if several types are encountered per OCC, indicate each type (On site validation): Wattage of lamps controlled by (From da...

AI summary The document contains forms and tables related to energy usage and equipment details, specifically focusing on lighting, cooling, heating, and refrigeration systems. It includes information on wattage, operation hours, and equipment schedules, likely for the purpose of evaluating energy efficiency programs.

lamps: - 32 W high-performance T8 (HPT8) lamps (HPT8-32W) - 28 W reduced-wattage T8 lamps (RW-T8-28W) - 25 W reduced-wattage T8 lamps (RW-T8-25W); and > HPT8 ballasts. The program is both a resource acquisition and a market transformation...

AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, aimed to achieve 8.04 GWh of electricity savings in 2011. It includes high-performance T8 lamps, reduced-wattage T8 lamps, and HPT8 ballasts. The program also incorporated the Upstream Business Energy Rebates (UBER) sub-program, which targeted specific energy-efficient products and was evaluated under the SLC program.

PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET A tracking sheet is not used to monitor savings for the SLC program. However, invoices provided by distributors and monthly reporting sheets developed by the PM were reviewed. Econoler reviewed the content of some of...

AI summary The document outlines the process for tracking savings under the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, including the review of invoices and monthly reporting sheets. Issues with incomplete invoice data and the approval of such invoices by the Program Manager are noted.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report On-Site Visit Protocol An on-site visit protocol listing the information to be collected was developed for each site, including the type, wattage and number of old products and new...

AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the on-site visit protocol used to collect data on energy efficiency products installed, as well as the method for calculating gross savings. It highlights the need to avoid double counting of rebates across different programs and provides details on the number of lamps and ballasts considered for energy savings calculations.

Sales Number of Category of Products Products Sold LED Downlights 555 LED Wall Packs 784 T5 High Bay Fixtures 134 T8 High Bay Fixtures 45 Occupancy Sensors 214 For each of these products, unitary savings values were calculated by the PM us...

AI summary The text provides data on the number of energy-efficient products sold and discusses the methodology used to calculate energy savings for these products. Savings values were based on the Efficiency Vermont 2006 technical reference manual and were not revised. The hours of operation for the SLC program were set at 3,400 annually, derived from historical data and compared to participant declarations and other jurisdictions.

INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH DISTRIBUTORS DISTRIBUTOR INTERVIEW GUIDE ENSC SMART LIGHTING CHOICES PROGRAM November 1, 2011 Hello, may I please speak with _? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTIO...

AI summary This document is an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Smart Lighting Choices Program with distributors. It outlines how to identify and screen respondents who are knowledgeable about the program's products, such as T8 lamps and HPT8 ballasts.

-performance and low wattage T8 lamps in 2011 will be significantly lower/higher (select the appropriate term) than for the previous year. Is there any reason for this change? [PROBE: market trend, more competitors offering these products,...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Smart Lighting Choices Program on the sales of high-performance and low wattage T8 lamps in 2011, asking whether the incentive influenced sales and by how much. It also inquires about other rebates offered for these products.

2011 Evaluation Report (If percentage is too different from percentage given at T2, validate both, and if they remain the same, try to get an explanation) T6. Do you think that the ¢75 incentive provided to clients for each high-performanc...

AI summary The document presents a series of questions related to the evaluation of incentives for high-performance T8 lamps and HPT8 ballasts, including their sufficiency and impact on sales, as well as the promotion of these products. It also asks about potential differences in sales between 2010 and 2011 and the influence of the incentive program on sales.

cent T8 lamps (Contact declaration): Total number – High performance T8 lamps installed (From database): Total number – High performance T8 lamps installed (On-site validation/Contact declaration): Collect the information for up to 3 secti...

AI summary The document provides data on the installation of high-performance T8 lamps as part of the Smart Lighting Choices Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including information collected from database entries and on-site validation.

information for up to 3 sections: Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Measure location: Date of installation: Type – Baseline Fluorescent T12 and/or T8 lamps (Contact declaration): Power – Existing Fluorescent T12 lamps [W] (Contact declaration/...

AI summary The document provides a template for collecting data on the installation and performance of reduced wattage T8 lamps under the Smart Lighting Choices Program. It includes sections for measuring lamp types, power consumption, installation dates, and usage patterns.

the use of different software, this comparison could help identify which one is closest to reality. It was mentioned that ABI would do this comparison when data is available. CINC-R3. Clearly define the CPG minimum requirements at the earl...

AI summary The document discusses the need for standardized minimum requirements for CINC projects and the inclusion of peak demand savings in impact calculations. It highlights the importance of providing clear documentation early in the project process and suggests that even small demand savings can significantly impact program outcomes as participation increases.

l or not-for-profit new constructions. 2 FRANKEL, Mark et al., “Core Performance Guide: Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Edition 1.00,” New Building Institute – Advanced Buildings Program, 2010. Ref.: 5725 3 Commercial & Industrial Custo...

AI summary The Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction (CINC) program offers different paths for incentives, including the New Construction Prescriptive Rebate path, which functions similarly to the BER program. ENSC facilitates the process for small construction projects under CINC while providing financial incentives through BER.

ustomers, providing advice, reviewing building design) but financial incentives are provided through the BER program. Depending on the program path selected, incentives are awarded based on: 1. A specific amount per floor area ($/square me...

AI summary The BER program provides financial incentives for energy efficiency measures, with criteria based on floor area, incremental costs, or prescriptive approaches. ENSC granted $0.10/kWh saved for projects under the NCWB path in 2011. The CINC program aimed for 4.8 GWh of electricity savings and a combined 10.4 MW demand savings target with C&IC in 2011.

to identify measures or design techniques which it considers “common practice” in its service territory. ENSC usually provides incentives only for measures which exceed the deemed common practice. Ref.: 5725 5 Commercial & Industrial Custo...

AI summary The document outlines the logic models for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction (C&IC) and Commercial & Industrial New Construction (CINC) programs, illustrating the causal links between program activities and expected market changes. ENSC typically provides incentives only for measures exceeding deemed common practice.

mportant to the PM are covered. The two most important components of the plan are the evaluation methodology as well as the pre- and post-data required to apply the selected methodology. > Track the number of energy audits that are not acc...

AI summary The document discusses the importance of tracking energy audits not accepted under the C&IC program by ENSC. It highlights that a high rate of rejected audits may indicate unclear eligibility criteria or issues with consultants. ENSC has already begun developing a system to track these audits.

After the completion of the CINC program content analysis, the Evaluator established the following list of comments and recommendations that aim to improve the program manual structure and contents: > Define the expression “artificially-lo...

AI summary The Evaluator provided several recommendations to improve the CINC program manual, including defining the term 'artificially-low baseline,' developing a standard form for NCWB feasibility studies, and documenting parameters used for estimating program objectives.

incentive, are also included in the spreadsheet. Finally, the tracking sheet contains a verification field whose value may be either yes/no for the NCWB path or N/A (not available) for the NCCP path. As mentioned previously, the energy sav...

AI summary The document discusses the tracking sheet used for energy savings calculations in the NCCP and NCWB programs. It mentions the use of an energy saving coefficient based on simulations by the Advanced Buildings Institute and outlines adjustments recommended for improving the tracking sheet's consistency and evaluation.

2011 Evaluation Report With the aim of improving further activities and impacts of the C&IC program, the Evaluator recommends the following: > Adjust the eligibility criteria to include projects that partly comply with the CPG because of s...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends adjusting the C&IC program's eligibility criteria to include projects that partly comply with the CPG due to specific corporate requirements, such as non-negotiable lighting standards. This would allow partial compliance while maintaining minimum performance requirements.

ributes to achieving the savings predicted by the modeling. The CPG already includes an enhanced building commissioning component that could be used. 4.3.4 Section of ENSC Website Commercial, institutional and industrial customers can easi...

AI summary The document discusses improvements to the ENSC website's description of the CPG, noting that the CPG is a tool rather than a program. It also mentions that the CINC program is new, and the verification partner had limited experience with it during the evaluation.

1.163 For reference purposes, the detailed sampling plan for the selection of C&IC on-site visits is presented in Appendix IX. 5.1.2 Sampling Methodology – CINC Program In October 2011, eight projects were expected to be completed and appr...

AI summary This section outlines the sampling methodology for on-site visits under the CINC program, which was planned to assess energy savings from implemented measures. Two on-site visits were planned for eight projects expected to be completed by the end of 2011.

Table 18: List of CINC Projects for 2011 and Respective Estimated Savings (as of October 2011) Tracked Energy Program Location Percentage of Total No. Project Status Savings at the Meter Patha (city) Energy Savings (kWh) 1 NCCP Antigonish...

AI summary Table 18 lists CINC projects for 2011 with their locations, statuses, and estimated energy savings. The table highlights the progress and energy savings of various construction projects under the NCCP and NCWB programs as of October 2011.

NCCP: New Construction Core Performance path, NCWB: New Construction Whole Building b This project is the least likely to be completed in 2011 among all CINC projects under construction in 2011. Ref.: 5725 38 Commercial & Industrial Custom...

AI summary The document discusses the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on a 2011 evaluation report and the selection criteria for site visits.

ed in accordance with project specificities, such as the program component in which the customer participated (C&IC or CINC), or the type of energy efficiency measures implemented through the project. The Evaluator conducted the 25 on-site...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted on-site visits to assess energy savings from efficiency measures, calculating adjustment ratios to refine program savings estimates. Lighting retrofits were the primary source of energy savings in the C&IC program, contributing to 70% of the projected savings in 2011.

te of the nameplate of spare ballasts) during on-site visits. When not written on the nameplate, the ballast factor could be found on the Internet through the manufacturer website. Installation Rate When possible, the Evaluator conducted a...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted inspections of lighting fixtures to ensure accurate energy savings calculations. A census was performed when feasible, while samples were used for large facilities. Discrepancies between reports and actual counts prompted further audits to improve accuracy.

0, and the 2011 component was in fact the termination of project implementation. The methodology employed for project impact verification and on-site visits was therefore similar to that used in 2010. For these two street lighting projects...

AI summary The document describes the verification process for two street lighting projects in 2011, including on-site visits to confirm the installation of LED fixtures and the collection of technical specifications. The methodology used was similar to that of 2010. The Evaluator also estimated hours of operation using data from ENSC and confirmed it with city staff. Traffic and street lighting systems operate year-round with constant demand, leading to a diversity factor of 100 percent.

eet lighting systems are steadily in operation year round, their electricity demand (in kW) is constant. The Evaluator thus set the diversity factor to 100 percent. 5.2.3 C&IC – Motors and Drives There was only one project of the 2011 samp...

AI summary The evaluation of a 2011 project involving variable-speed drives (VSDs) and motor retrofits found that the M&V approach used by the consultant was questionable. The Evaluator recommended a more thorough method, such as IPMVP Options B or C, involving power monitoring over a minimum period of two weeks.

um period (2 weeks). IPMVP Options B or C would therefore be appropriate. However, the consultant only made spot measurements with a power clamp meter to evaluate energy savings from VSD installation Ref.: 5725 44 Commercial & Industrial C...

AI summary The evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program found that the consultant's method of assessing energy savings using IPMVP Option A was not appropriate. Spot measurements with a power clamp meter were used instead of more accurate methods like IPMVP Options B or C. An on-site visit was conducted to verify installations and collect equipment data.

onfirmed that these three chillers were not used for purposes (such as space cooling) other than the manufacturing process. This project was therefore considered to be a process refrigeration project. For project impact evaluation, Econole...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a refrigeration project involving chillers used in a manufacturing process. It outlines the steps taken to assess the project's impact, including on-site verification of equipment installation and efficiency calculations based on manufacturer testing and consultant input.

oreover, the Evaluator defined the chiller operation schedules with the customer, which helped estimate the operation hours as well as the diversity factors to be used for energy savings calculations. Finally, the Evaluator established tha...

AI summary The Evaluator established that the chiller operation schedules had no significant impact on heating or cooling loads. Additionally, a 2011 retrofit project replaced inefficient UPS systems, with ENSC confirming installation and assuming energy savings were realized, though more detailed M&V was planned for later.

l the received documents and evaluating the actual compliance of the projects with CPG requirements. The Evaluator also collected any new documentation from either ENSC or sample program participants. For calculating the verified project i...

AI summary The evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program found that participants had low understanding of CPG compliance requirements. Due to missing documentation and uncertainties, the evaluator decided not to adjust the energy savings calculated by ENSC for 2011 and provided recommendations for improvement.

2011, Econoler therefore elected to take the energy savings calculated by ENSC without adjustment. Econoler also developed several recommendations for improving next year’s program impact evaluation. 5.2.7 Adjusted Gross Savings The 2011 g...

AI summary Econoler used energy savings data from ENSC without adjustment and recommended improvements for next year's program impact evaluation. Adjustments to gross energy and demand savings were made in 2011 based on comparisons between sample project savings and tracking sheet data, divided into three categories by measure types.

ngs and what was presented in the tracking sheet. To improve the adjustment precision, it was decided to divide the savings adjustment calculation into three categories depending on the measure types:

AI summary The text discusses improving the precision of savings adjustment calculations by dividing them into three categories based on measure types, as presented in the tracking sheet.

Adjustments to “Lighting Retrofit Only” projects: Due to its predominance in the 2011 population of C&IC projects9, the “Lighting Retrofit Only” project type has its own adjustment factors for the energy and demand savings. These factors w...

AI summary The document discusses adjustments to energy and demand savings for different project types under the C&IC and CINC programs. Lighting Retrofit Only projects have specific adjustment factors based on on-site visits, while other C&IC projects use average factors. CINC projects face challenges in verifying demand savings due to data limitations and simulation issues.

ng simulations that were not verifiable. These figures were different for each CPG measure, and varied depending on the HVAC systems installed as well as on regional considerations (climate). It was 9 As per Appendix IX of this report, the...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses challenges in estimating demand savings from the C&IC program, including unverifiable simulation data, variability in HVAC systems and regional climate, lack of diversity factors in demand calculations, and insufficient on-site visits to confirm compliance levels.

unt the side effects on space heating and cooling systems as well as the diversity factor. There is no need for additional calculations with regard to those two aspects of project impact calculations. The next table shows the adjustment fa...

AI summary The document discusses adjustment factors used in energy and demand savings calculations for different project types under the C&IC and CINC programs. It provides estimates of gross energy and peak demand savings for 2011 at both the meter and generator levels, noting that no demand savings were calculated for the CINC program.

and Savings 12% -9% N/A N/A Total Gross Peak Demand 2.263 1.526 3.790 0 Savings – at the Meter (MW) Average Line Loss Factor 1.067 1.069 1.068 N/A Total Gross Peak Demand 2.416 1.631 4.047 0 Savings – at the Generator (MW) Notes: The line...

AI summary The text provides data on energy savings and demand reductions under the C&IC program, highlighting the need for future adjustments to improve calculation methodologies. It includes notes on line loss factors, demand savings, and interactive effects of energy efficiency measures.

n though the methodology used to calculate the gross savings under the C&IC program is efficient, a number of adjustments could be made in the future to improve it. The Evaluator recommends that ENSC: > Clearly define the M&V requirements...

AI summary The Evaluator suggests that the C&IC program should improve its methodology for calculating gross savings by clearly defining M&V requirements before signing the PDA. It also recommends that M&V plans be compliant with IPMVP Chapter 5 and that ENSC continue developing standardized M&V plan templates.

e templates should significantly help program participants develop their own M&V plan and it is a first step toward standardizing the M&V activities performed under the C&IC program. > Envisage performing third-party M&V for C&IC projects...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of third-party monitoring and verification (M&V) for the C&IC program to ensure compliance with the IPMVP and accuracy of energy savings. It suggests that projects with significant energy savings or those where the implementation firm conducts M&V should undergo third-party verification to mitigate risks.

matically require third-party M&V from those for which it would be optional. The Evaluator believes that third-party M&V could be done either by ENSC or by an independent consultant. > Build the capacity of ENSC on M&V and IPMVP requiremen...

AI summary The Evaluator notes that third-party M&V is not consistently applied in ENSC projects, with many projects lacking proper M&V plans and reports that comply with IPMVP standards. Discrepancies in measurement methods, such as using spot measurements instead of run-time measurements, have led to inaccuracies in savings calculations.

ions for Future CINC Project Impact Calculations For future years, the Evaluator recommends the following with regard to gross impact calculations of new construction projects under the CINC program: > Conduct a separate complete evaluatio...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends conducting a separate evaluation for the CINC program and defining energy savings indices based on factors such as building characteristics, climate zones, and market sectors to improve the accuracy of impact calculations for new construction projects.

ensure that these cross effects are not overestimated, which would explain why the CPG-compliant warehouse building consumes more than the typical MNECB-compliant warehouse building. > Add a limited amount of peak demand savings in project...

AI summary The document discusses the need to adjust the CPG baseline to reflect current construction practices and the importance of accurately estimating demand savings for CINC projects. It highlights that the current baseline uses the 1997 MNECB, which may not represent current standards, and suggests using diversity factors to improve demand savings calculations.

Code Compliance, p. 43. 13 On page 11 of the CPG, the text refers to savings from 25 percent to 35 percent over beyond the performance of a building that meets the requirements of the MNECB 1997. Ref.: 5725 53 Commercial & Industrial Custo...

AI summary The text discusses the use of Performance and Design Agreement (PDA) savings figures for estimating project savings under the Nova Scotia Clean Work Building Program (NCWB) and mentions the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) evaluation approach for the Compliance and Incentive Program (C&IC). It emphasizes the importance of using PDA data instead of placeholder savings factors for more accurate forecasting.

ts, which were initially forecast to represent a small percentage of CINC program savings. In reality, the two NCWB projects of 2011 accounted for more than 40 percent of total program energy savings. For the C&IC program, the evaluated ne...

AI summary The CINC program's energy savings were higher than initially forecast, with two NCWB projects contributing over 40% of total savings. The C&IC program's net demand savings were higher than those tracked by ENSC, partly due to an increase in the NTGR and adjustments to diversity factors by Econoler.

Program 9. Add a new field for the savings at the consumer level: At the time this report Tracking Sheet was written, the field for the 2011 installed energy savings (in kWh) was supposed to sum energy savings at the generator level (i.e.,...

AI summary The text discusses the need to improve data accuracy in energy savings tracking by adding a field for consumer-level savings and splitting the demand savings field into two columns to account for kW and kVA differences based on tariff rates. These changes aim to reduce errors and improve data integrity in the tracking sheet.

Impact 22. Build the capacity of ENSC on M&V and IPMVP requirements: As per the Evaluation program manual, all C&IC projects must have an M&V plan compliant with the IPMVP (Section 5.7 of the program manual). This would also mean that all...

AI summary The evaluation highlights a lack of compliance with M&V and IPMVP requirements in C&IC projects, noting missing M&V plans and improper measurement methods. The Evaluator recommends training for ENSC staff on M&V and IPMVP to improve accuracy and adherence to standards.

ator encourages ENSC to organize trainings on M&V and the IPMVP for C&IC program staff. 23. Record the diversity factors used for peak demand savings calculations: When analyzing the C&IC savings per project, Econoler realized that the div...

AI summary Econoler advises ENSC to improve the accuracy of peak demand savings calculations by recording diversity factors for each project and their rationale. The current approach uses overly conservative diversity factors, such as 70% for a 24/7 facility, which should be closer to 100% for accurate assessments.

Program 1. Define the expression “artificially-low baseline”: In Section 3.2 of the Manual Feasibility Guide (Appendix B), the expression “artificially-low baseline” is written Content in a yellow textbox. It would be preferable to define...

AI summary The text outlines several recommendations for improving the clarity and standardization of the NCWB program manual. These include defining key terms, creating standard forms for feasibility studies, documenting parameters for program objectives, and standardizing terminology for consistency.

Program 6. Create automatic formulas for calculating data that are dependent on data Tracking Sheet of other fields: In tracking systems, it is a good practice to create automatic links in fields where information is dependent on the infor...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends creating automatic formulas in the CINC tracking database to calculate financial incentives based on the chosen program path (NCCP or NCWB) and suggests standardizing entries using drop-down lists to reduce data entry errors and improve consistency.

ENSC should also consider using the same acronyms for defining the project path as those used in the program manuals, i.e., NCCP and NCWB instead of CP and EM. – “Status” column: As per its name, this field aims to identify the project pro...

AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving data tracking and standardization in ENSC programs, including the use of consistent acronyms, defining project status options, standardizing the 'Finish Month' field, and adding a peak demand savings column to the tracking sheet for NCWB projects.

Program 17. Consider adding a commissioning component to the program: The Design and Evaluator believes that ENSC should consider promoting building Implementation commissioning in the program since it has been proven that an effective com...

AI summary The document suggests adding a commissioning component to the ENSC program, revising the description of the CPG, offering commissioning and calibrating modeling tools, and conducting a separate evaluation for the CINC program to improve performance and accuracy of savings predictions.

CINC program are also expected to increase in the upcoming years. With this in mind, Econoler believes ENSC should conduct a separate complete evaluation for the CINC program in 2012. Moreover, a separate evaluation could help shed light o...

AI summary Econoler recommends a separate evaluation of the CINC program in 2012 to address uncertainties in calculating savings related to CPG compliance. It also suggests defining energy savings indices based on factors like building characteristics, climate zones, and market sectors to improve the accuracy of energy savings calculations.

Impact 22. Review the simulation made for the warehouse typical building: Through Evaluation the impact evaluation process, ENSC submitted the spreadsheet “1 Measure Level Outputs – All Buildings.xlsx,” which showed the key results from th...

AI summary The evaluation of the warehouse building simulations revealed an anomaly where applying the CPG increased energy consumption compared to the MNECB-1997. This discrepancy is attributed to the higher lighting power density in the CPG and potential overestimation of cross effects on heating systems.

compliant warehouse building consumes more than the typical MNECB-compliant warehouse building. 23. Add a limited amount of peak demand savings in project impact calculations: For 2011, ENSC did not calculate electricity demand savings for...

AI summary The evaluation report discusses the need for ENSC to account for peak demand savings in the CINC program, noting that demand savings were estimated but not included in the 2011 calculations. It also recommends using a diversity factor based on building operation schedules to improve future impact calculations.

Impact 24. Consider redefining the CPG baseline taking into account up-to-date Evaluation construction practices: The potential energy savings to be realized due to the implementation of the CPG are estimated using a facility built to the...

AI summary The text discusses the need to update the CPG baseline to reflect current construction practices and the importance of using PDA savings figures for NCWB project impact estimation. It highlights the outdated use of the 1997 MNECB as a baseline and suggests a market study to determine if newer standards have been adopted.

red with 2010 respondents, when a number had energy costs that were 50 percent or more of their annual operating budget. Table 24: Energy Costs as a Percent of Annual Operating Budget Percent of Budget 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 11 8...

AI summary The document highlights that in 2010, a significant number of respondents had energy costs making up 50% or more of their annual operating budget. Table 24 provides a breakdown of energy costs as a percentage of the annual operating budget across different years, showing an increase in the average percentage from 12% in 2008 to 37% in 2010. The report also mentions that the majority of respondents are from the manufacturing sector.

2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV – INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: Custom New Construction Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: List of questions (Q) and comments (C) discussed Source:...

AI summary The document discusses the Custom New Construction Program, focusing on the Core Performance Guide and its baseline standards. Questions raised include whether the Core Performance Guide is a program or a tool, the use of MNECB 97 as a baseline, and the concept of an artificial low baseline in the program's design.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Page 2 Q: If you use required internal standard as a base line for some cases, would it still be that level even if its lower than the (MNECB) 97 requirements? Page 3 (M& V) Q: If y...

AI summary The document contains questions and comments regarding the Evaluation Report of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. Issues raised include baseline standards, data validation, program structure, financial calculations, and participant support materials. The discussion focuses on improving data collection, program clarity, and participant engagement.

e likelihood that you would have implemented exactly the same energy efficient measures that you FR2a = Answer x 10% installed through the program? (Scale 0 to 10) FR2b. In the absence of the program, what is the likelihood that you would...

AI summary The text outlines a method for evaluating the impact of an energy efficiency program by assessing the likelihood of implementing energy-efficient measures without the program, the influence of program factors, and the financial impact of rebates on project costs.

day Schedule 2 Time of use (specified Hours per above) day Schedule 3 Time of use (specified Hours per above) day ENSC_C&IC_On‐Site Visits Protocol 111024.xlsx 2012‐02‐15 1 of 4 C&I Custom Retrofit Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporatio...

AI summary This document outlines the on-site visit protocol for the C&I Custom Retrofit Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes sections for describing building heating and cooling systems, as well as verified energy and demand savings from monitoring and verification (M&V).

oints (occ./ unocc. temp., % hum) 4. Verified Energy Savings from M&V M&V Energy Savings (kWh/year) M&V Demand Savings (kW/year) 5. Additional Notes ENSC_C&IC_On‐Site Visits Protocol 111024.xlsx 2012‐02‐15 2 of 4 C&I Custom Retrofit Progra...

AI summary The document outlines a protocol for on-site visits under the C&I Custom Retrofit Program, focusing on lighting system assessments and energy savings verification through M&V (Monitoring and Verification). It includes tables for recording energy and demand savings and instructions for identifying emergency lighting systems.

systems; > efficient halogen MR16, PAR30 and PAR38 lamps; > exterior lighting upgrades such as high-pressure sodium and metal halides; and > lighting controls such as occupancy sensors. Participating businesses pay as little as 20 percent...

AI summary The document outlines the SBES program's modifications in 2011, including allowing delivery agents to choose vendors, adding occupancy sensors, and improving recycling services. Participating businesses pay up to 20% of installation costs, with ENSC covering the remainder. Delivery agents play a key role in program success.

4.27 MW in 2011. The SBES program generated net electricity savings of 11.21 GWh in 2010, 4.70 GWh in 2009 and 1.52 GWh in 2008. Eligible Measures The promoted measures in 2011 were the following: > A variety of CFLs including hard glass,...

AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2011 promoted various energy-efficient lighting measures, including CFLs, LEDs, and lighting controls, and achieved electricity savings of 11.21 GWh in 2010. The document outlines the program's logic model and evaluation methodology.

ement Data System. For measures with a reduction in hours of operation, the projected hours of operation are also based on information provided by participants during the installation of a measure. Ref.: 5725 10 Small Business Energy Solut...

AI summary The document outlines how demand and energy savings are calculated for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, specifically for lamp replacements. Savings are based on wattage differences and the number of units installed, with hours of operation derived from the database or assumed to be the same for baseline and replacement measures.

uture evaluations, the Evaluator recommends increasing the number of on-site visits conducted during the evaluation process in order to obtain reliable installation ratios. 4.2.4 Diversity Factor Based on the information received from ENSC...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends increasing on-site visits to improve installation ratio reliability. A 70% diversity factor was calculated based on peak demand analysis and on-site evaluations. Adjustments using line loss factors and installation rates were applied to calculate revised gross energy and demand savings for various measures.

he “Rise” project. The line loss factors were provided by Nova Scotia Power for each rate code. The total revised savings obtained for each category of measures implemented are presented in Table 20. The total gross energy savings for the...

AI summary The document discusses the 'Rise' project and provides line loss factors for each rate code, as well as the total revised savings from the SBES program, including gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.

Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling systems. In the case of the SBES program, replacement of regular lighting...

AI summary The SBES program's energy efficiency measures have interactive effects on heating and cooling systems. Replacing regular lighting with efficient lighting in non-refrigerated spaces increases winter heating loads and decreases summer cooling loads. An interactive effects factor of -7.7% was applied, based on a 1992 ADS study for Hydro-Québec using DOE2 simulations of electrically heated commercial buildings.

- -7.7% 4 ADS ASSOCIÉS, “Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale,” report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. Ref.: 5725 32 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nov...

AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating energy savings from lighting products installed in refrigeration units, using an approach similar to that used in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It mentions an interactive effects factor of +40 percent for such installations and references a table presenting gross savings including these effects.

, energy costs accounted for less than 20% of the annual operating budget for three-quarters of the respondents (75%). Table 24: Energy Costs as a Percentage of Annual Operating Budget Percent of Budget 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 29 2...

AI summary The text discusses energy costs as a percentage of annual operating budgets, showing that less than 20% of the budget was attributed to energy costs for 75% of respondents. It also highlights that 69% of respondents reported owning their facilities, with data spanning from 2008 to 2011.

- INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: Small Business Energy Solutions Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: List of questions (Q) and comments (C) discussed Source: Evaluation Report 2010 Page...

AI summary This text discusses the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, including questions about the program's theory, incentives, structure, and eligibility criteria. It also mentions the program's name change from Small Business Direct Install and considerations for improving the program manual.

4. 2 to less than 3 years later? 5. 3 to less than 4 years later? 6. 4 or more years later? 7. (Never) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FR3. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid up to 80% of the $[TOTAL PROJECT COST] total project cost. If your compa...

AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's incentives on project decisions and the importance of various factors in implementing energy-efficient lighting products. The survey includes response scales and is part of an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program.

2011 Evaluation Report Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. Efficiency Nova Scotia _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Financial Assistance b. Information received during the initial contact by the program _ Response _98 Don’t Know _...

AI summary This 2011 evaluation report examines the Small Business Energy Solutions Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on factors such as financial assistance, information provided during initial contact, and corporate policies related to energy efficiency. The report includes survey responses and references a SPILLOVER series.

installing or replacing energy-using products for your business in the future? [98 = Don’t know/Don’t recall, 99 = Refused] BARRIERS TO ACTION & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS [B series] B1. Does your company or organization own or lease...

AI summary The text outlines a series of survey questions related to barriers faced by businesses in implementing energy efficiency measures through the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It includes questions about property ownership, permission requirements, and the identification of the most significant barrier.

f 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all important’ and 5=‘very important’, how important is reducing energy usage to your company or organization? [98 = Don’t know/Don’t recall, 99 = Refused] B8. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all important’...

AI summary The text contains survey questions aimed at understanding the importance of energy usage reduction and cost management for businesses, as well as feedback on the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It asks about the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs and seeks suggestions for program improvements and the potential benefits of a participation flowchart.

When were the lamps removed or when did they burn? Is the facility manager planning to have them replaced? If, not why? Are they OK with the reduced light level? Hours of use per year (From database) Ref.: 5725 87 Small Business Energy Sol...

AI summary The text contains questions and data collection items related to the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes inquiries about lighting usage, equipment hours, and fixture status, as well as data fields for lighting and cooling/heating systems.

Is the equipment still used? If not, which percentage is operating? When did the change occur? Number – Occupancy sensor (From database): Number – Occupancy sensor installed (On-site validation): Ref.: 5725 91 Small Business Energy Solutio...

AI summary The document contains a table and questions related to the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It focuses on occupancy sensors and the lamps they control, including their usage, wattage, and operation hours before installation.

MEAN VALUE OF: PA1 Score: (FR2a ; FR2b) FR3. If your company had not received the rebate offered by the program, would you have paid for the full cost of the project, including the portion FR3 = Answer x 10% covered by the rebate? (Scale 0...

AI summary The text outlines a set of questions related to evaluating the impact of an energy efficiency program, focusing on factors such as rebate influence, cost considerations, and likelihood of installation without the program. It includes scoring mechanisms based on responses to these questions.

ew Page Port Hawkesbury paper mill in Nova Scotia. The M&V report produced by EPS is titled “Detailed Review of Completed Energy Efficiency Projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury,” October 17, 2011. 1 M&V REPORT REVISION AND ANALYSIS Two re...

AI summary The document discusses the M&V report prepared by EPS for the New Page Port Hawkesbury paper mill, which evaluated energy efficiency projects. Two reports were reviewed, with the second one, completed in 2011, following the SEP protocol based on IPMVP standards. The report used a top-down approach as the primary method for calculating savings, with a bottom-up analysis as a sanity check.

s, including free floating intercept and forced zero intercept. The statistical analyses performed are state-of-the-art and well done and the Evaluator has no concerns with the work performed by EPS. The figure below presents one of the an...

AI summary The document discusses a CUSUM analysis of TMP energy usage at the New Page plant, highlighting trends in energy usage before and after the implementation of energy efficiency measures. The Evaluator notes the effectiveness of the analysis and raises questions about discrepancies in the timeline of improvements and energy usage changes.

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Review 2 FOLLOW UP INVESTIGATION Upon reviewing the report, a series of questions on elements not covered specifically in the report and that could have affected the energy usage of the pl...

AI summary An evaluation review of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 report identified discrepancies in energy usage calculations. A follow-up investigation involved interviews with EPS experts and New Page Industry's Mr. Mark Frith to understand why the top-down approach results were 26% higher than expected bottom-up savings. The examination focused on feedstock and finished product characteristics that may have influenced energy usage.

energy usage of the plant even in the absence of any energy efficiency projects. The following sections describe the main inquiries that were analysed during interviews. Feedstock Material Variation Raw material characteristics are mandato...

AI summary The document discusses the importance of accounting for feedstock material variation in energy efficiency assessments. It highlights that raw material characteristics must be analyzed to avoid misinterpreting energy changes as savings. The EPS report was criticized for not addressing these factors, and the plant lacks precise tracking of raw material inputs.

l. He also mentioned that there was no mass metering at the entry of the TMP and that all tonnage processed had to be estimated on the basis of the speed of the alimentation screw to the system. The Ref.: 5725 6 Detailed Review of Complete...

AI summary The document discusses challenges in measuring raw material density at a paper plant, which affects the accuracy of mass evaluation. The plant uses the speed of the alimentation screw and the quantity of paper produced as proxies for throughput. While short-term variations can be significant, long-term accuracy is maintained if the raw material and collection areas remain consistent.

2011 Evaluation Review processes for reducing refining energy somewhat, consistent industrial performance has not 1 yet been achieved.” To determine if variations of finished paper products could have affected the energy usage of the plant...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Review discusses the impact of paper product variations on energy usage at a plant, confirming that production remained stable and changes in TMP pulp recipes did not significantly affect energy consumption.

order to improve the finished product brightness. The fresnel analysis led by EPS was performed specifically to check this parameter but found that it was non-significant in relation to energy usage. The interview conducted confirmed that...

AI summary The fresnel analysis conducted by EPS found that product type and sulfur content had no significant impact on energy usage. The Evaluator concluded that product type likely did not affect the top-down energy savings calculation. Other factors, such as larger TMP production compared to paper output, may explain the higher-than-expected energy savings.

ency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Review Those include: Larger TMP Production Compared to Paper Output One of the effects of the energy efficiency project was the production of a better quality pulp and in larger quantity. For t...

AI summary The evaluation review highlights that the energy efficiency project at the pulp plant led to increased internal pulp production, displacing external purchases and affecting baseline calculations. Additionally, optimization of TMP line operations, particularly favoring Line #1, contributed to improved energy efficiency not initially accounted for in the project's savings calculations.

sed in the report. However, further discussions with EPS experts and plant representatives lead to the conclusion that these factors likely had only a small influence on the energy usage of the plant. The difference between the top-down ap...

AI summary The report discusses the evaluation of energy savings at a plant, comparing top-down and bottom-up approaches. The top-down method estimates annual energy savings of 154 GWh and demand savings of 17.8 MW, which are deemed a fair representation of the energy efficiency projects. The difference between the two approaches is attributed to factors like the optimization of the most efficient line and increased internal TMP pulp production.

5a. Nova Scotians cannot afford Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Supposedly, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corp (ENSC) is to act on a 'not‐for‐profit basis.' The existence and function of ENSC cannot be justified. The costs are excessive, unne...

AI summary The text argues that Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is not affordable for Nova Scotians, citing excessive costs, a large staff, and questionable spending. It criticizes ENSC's funding model, claiming that residential consumers bear most of the costs while receiving minimal benefits. The text also questions ENSC's effectiveness in reducing energy costs.

5 Response IR-1: Acronym Definition 2 eligible equipment in procurement policies and standard specifications. 3 4  The suite of eligible products will continue to expand in 2012. 5 6  ENSC is now assessing the use of online application f...

AI summary The document outlines the 2011 evaluated results and actual spending by program, showing performance metrics and expenditure figures for various energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia. Programs like Efficient Products, EnerGuide for Existing Houses, and Performance Plus (New Houses) are discussed with their respective targets and results.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL $\mathbf{C}$ A В Participation Estimated Number of Total Rate 2013 Units/Participants/ Eligible Facilities (C=B/A)Customers Efficient Products Rebates (Residential) 450,000 93,989 (U) N/A\ 415,000 Existing Residential 0.51...

AI summary The text provides participation and eligibility data for various energy efficiency programs, including residential and BNI (Business, Non-profit and Institutional) efficient products rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation initiatives, along with estimated numbers of participants and units involved.

c) For the BNI programs, the following tables provide a further breakdown of estimated participation rates among the eligible NSPI customer rate classes for 2013-2015. 1 2013 Efficient Products Rebates (BNI) Custom Incentives Direct Instal...

AI summary The tables provide a breakdown of estimated participation rates for BNI programs among eligible NSPI customer rate classes from 2013 to 2015. The data includes participation rates for various categories such as residential, industrial, and municipal customers, with some categories showing high participation and others showing little or no participation.

1 2014 Efficient Products Rebates (BNI) (U) Custom Incentives (F) Direct Installation (F) Residential/Charitable 19,393 2 56 Small General 19,318 1 59 General Demand 126,458 139 219 Large General 647 13 - Small Industrial 11,055 1 30 Mediu...

AI summary The document provides tables showing participation rates for energy efficiency programs, including Efficient Products Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation, across various customer categories from 2014 to 2015. It highlights participation numbers and rates for residential, commercial, and industrial customers.

2010 Prescriptive (U) Custom (F) Small Business Energy Solutions (F) Efficient Products - Direct Install (F) Residential/Charitable - 19 108 2,079 Small General 1 7 245 1,605 General Demand 153,382 49 420 1,427 Large General 148,584 3 - 49...

AI summary The text presents data on energy usage and programs related to energy efficiency, including residential, commercial, and industrial categories, with a focus on rebates and energy solutions in Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2012.

DSM Technical Tables Residential Table # 2013 $ (kW) (MWh) ($) ($) ($) (Ratio) (kW) (MWh) ($) ($) ($) (Ratio) (kW) (MWh) ($) ($) ($) (Ratio) Existing Homes CFL - Dimmable - 19 W 0.8 6.8 $1,906 $3,476 -$1,570 0.5 0.9 7.0 $2,192 $3,595 -$1,4...

AI summary This section presents technical tables related to Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, detailing energy savings and costs for various residential energy efficiency measures such as CFLs, power bars, showerheads, and thermostats across different years and scenarios.

2 - 3 The benefits of the programs are shown in terms of energy savings (GWh) and demand - 4 savings (MW), but the dollar Lifetime Benefits are shown as a single number ($million, - 5 second column). Please provide ENSC Evidence, Tables 4....

AI summary The request asks for separate figures showing the lifetime benefits of energy and demand savings from ENSC programs, currently combined in a single number. The response refers to ENSC Evidence, Figures 4.1 to 4.4, which provide this information.

Figure 4.1 Year Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) 2013 85.2 4.6 2014 92.6 6.2 2015 97.8 7.6 2016 102.8 9.6 2017 107.1 11.6 Total 485.3 39.5 Currency is expressed in 2013 dollars. Values may not add c...

AI summary Figure 4.1 presents the energy and demand lifetime benefits from 2013 to 2017, with cumulative totals in 2013 dollars. Energy benefits totaled $485.3 million, while demand benefits totaled $39.5 million.

Figure 4.3 2014 Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) RESIDENTIAL DSM PRO GRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 8.1 0.1 Existing Residentiald 13.0 1.5 New Residential 6.1 0.8 Energy Savings Actions 1.0 0.0 BUS...

AI summary Figure 4.3 presents the energy and demand lifetime benefits of various residential and business demand-side management (DSM) programs in 2014, measured in millions of 2013 dollars. The data highlights the net present value of avoided costs from these programs over their lifetime.

Figure 4.4 2015 Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) RESIDENTIAL DSM PRO GRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 10.8 0.2 Existing Residentiald 15.5 2.0 New Residential 7.7 1.1 Energy Savings Actions 1.6 0.0 BU...

AI summary This document presents data on the lifetime benefits of residential and business demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia, including energy and demand benefits, and includes a series of requests and responses regarding the avoided cost figure of $135/MWh used by Nova Scotia Power (NSPI). The responses reference Synapse reports and clarify that NSPI is responsible for determining avoided costs for DSM planning.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment 1) 1 Request IR-9: 2 3 a) Please confirm that the levelized avoided costs used in the development of TRCs and 4 PACs for the 2011 and 2012 DSM Plan were $166/MWh for energy and 5 $79/MW/year for demand. If these am...

AI summary The document includes a request and response regarding the levelized avoided costs used in the development of TRCs and PACs for the 2011 and 2012 DSM plans. The response confirms the costs and explains that the methodology used is consistent with the 2009 IRP Update.

- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-10: a) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 1, filed electronically. b) Over the three-year plan, no program areas fail the TRC test. The New Residential, Existing Residential and Energy Savings Actions prog...

AI summary The document discusses the TRC (Technology Readiness Curve) test results for several energy efficiency programs, noting that none failed the test. It highlights the New Residential program's strategic benefits, including market transformation and trade ally capacity building. ENSC acknowledges that its current TRC calculation method is conservative and may need updating, citing examples from other jurisdictions.

Request IR-13: 2 1 Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.23, lines 4-5, states that "...[C]onservation and energy efficiency [are] a lower-cost alternative to new supply". 5 6 a) What assumptions were made about NSPI's need for new supply? 7 8 b) Wh...

AI summary Request IR-13 asks about assumptions regarding NSPI's need for new supply and its forecast reserve margin from 2012 to 2017. The response directs to a table showing supply-side additions under DSM and No DSM scenarios and provides reserve margin data, indicating it met the minimum 20% requirement.

21 With DSM Case No DSM Case 2012 23% 22% 2013 24% 21% 2014 27% 23% 2015 28% 24% 2016 29% 23% 2017 30% 24% 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.32, Recommendation #2, lines 11 – 14, 4 5 a) Please provide details of the specific...

AI summary The text presents a comparison between DSM and non-DSM cases from 2012 to 2017, highlighting the percentage differences. It also includes a request and response related to the allocation of budgets for enabling strategies under ENSC, specifically focusing on education and outreach in 2013.

27 o Building Energy Estimation Business Sector 28 o Refrigeration Compressors Business Sector 29 o Air Compressor Systems Business Sector 30 o Refrigerators/Freezers Residential Sector 1 o Clothes Washers Residential Sector 2 o Small Netw...

AI summary The document outlines various sectors and equipment categories for energy estimation, including building energy, refrigeration compressors, and air compressor systems. It also discusses funding sources for DSM programs under Enabling Strategies and references another document for detailed information.

23 c) The potential loss of significant load would be reflected in NSPI's avoided costs. Please 24 refer to Multeese IR-6 and Synapse IR-14. 1 Request IR-17: 2 3 Reference: 4.4 Capacity Building Programs (Appendix A, pp. 27-28) 4 5 a) Plea...

AI summary The text discusses the potential loss of significant load and its reflection in NSPI's avoided costs, referencing Multeese IR-6 and Synapse IR-14. It also requests detailed information on training and associated expenses for capacity building programs for trade allies, specifically from ENSC in 2011 and 2012.

20 1 The funding for the national market study on fenestration is shared with the Nova Scotia 2 Department of Energy. The Nova Scotia Department of Energy is providing $5,000 in 3 funding for this study. 4 5 At this time the costs of the i...

AI summary The text discusses funding for a national market study on fenestration shared with the Nova Scotia Department of Energy, as well as administrative costs related to implementing the National Energy Code for Buildings and new energy efficiency measures. It also includes a request for confirmation regarding the allocation of enabling strategies under the DSM Plan and changes in funding for different customer classes.

2 COLUMN A B C D E F G H I J 4 Program costs incurred on participating rate classes 5 Program Existing Homes New Homes Efficient Products Home Energy Report Prescriptive Custom (incl. New Construction) Small Business Direct Install Educati...

AI summary The table outlines program costs incurred on various rate classes from 2010 to 2015, showing percentages allocated to different programs such as Prescriptive, Custom, Education & Outreach, and Development and Research. The data reflects the distribution of costs across different categories and years.

10 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 31 30 30 30 30 30 1 Request IR-24: 2 3 a) Does ENSC have a "program manager" (or similarly otherwise titled individual) 4 responsible to liaise with each Large Industrial customer with respect to its DSM 5...

AI summary The document outlines requests and responses regarding ENSC's DSM programs, including whether ENSC has a program manager for Large Industrial customers, if surveys were conducted with these customers, and how program costs are tracked and allocated. ENSC responds that account managers handle customer relations and that tracking is done by customer class, except for the SLC program.

1 Request IR-27: 2 3 Reference: Appendix C, Table 3 (2013), (2014) and (2015), Attachments 1-2, 1-10 and 1-15. 4 5 Please confirm that ENSC is allocating the following program costs to the ELI-2P-RTP

AI summary The document references a request (IR-27) for confirmation on whether ENSC is allocating specific program costs to the ELI-2P-RTP, citing Appendix C, Table 3 and various attachments from 2013 to 2015.

6 Acronym Definition SBES Small Business Energy Solutions SEP Superior Energy Performance SLC Smart Lighting Choices TRC Total Resource Cost UARB Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board WETT Wood Energy Technology Transfer 1 Request IR-2: 2 3...

AI summary The response to Request IR-2 discusses variances in spending and energy savings for various DSM programs. The Low Income Households program exceeded its budget and energy target due to increased participation, while EnerGuide for Existing Houses had a spending variance due to market volatility.

programs in 2012. 1  Continue direct outreach to purchasing managers of large businesses, to include 2 eligible equipment in procurement policies and standard specifications. 3 4  The suite of eligible products will continue to expand in...

AI summary The document outlines the 2012 programs, focusing on expanding eligible products, simplifying participation through online application forms, and evaluating 2011 results against targets for various energy efficiency initiatives. Results show varying levels of achievement across different programs.

Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) 40,000 242,682 (U) N/A\ Custom Incentives 2,500 205 (F) 8.20% Direct Installation 40,000 500 (F) 1.25%

AI summary The text provides data on various energy efficiency programs, including Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation, with figures indicating the number of participants, total incentives, and percentages.

\ Not applicable: a customer may install multiple measures. A B C 2014 Estimated Total Eligible Customers Number of Units/Participants/ Facilities Participation Rate (C=B/A) Efficient Product Rebates (Residential) 455000 161,514 (U) N/A Ex...

AI summary The document presents participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia for the years 2014 and 2015, including efficient product rebates, energy savings actions, and direct installation initiatives. The data highlights the number of participants and participation rates for residential and BNI programs.

2010 Prescriptive (U) Custom (F) Small Business Energy Solutions (F) Efficient Products - Direct Install (F) Residential/Charitable - 19 108 2,079 Small General 1 7 245 1,605 General Demand 153,382 49 420 1,427 Large General 148,584 3 - 49...

AI summary The document presents participation data for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2012, including Prescriptive, Custom, Small Business Energy Solutions, and Efficient Products - Direct Install programs. The data is categorized by customer type and includes participation numbers for different sectors such as residential, industrial, and municipal.

Table 2.2: Residential Existing Homes (Excluding Low Income, Including MURB) Program Results by Measure Table 2.2: ResidentialExisting Homes (Excluding Low Income, Including MURB)Program Results by Measure Low Income CFL: Screw-In (<=15W)...

AI summary Table 2.2 presents program results for residential existing homes in Nova Scotia, excluding low-income households and including multi-unit residential buildings. It details outcomes for various energy efficiency measures, including the number of units, total program participation, costs, and savings for different categories such as compact fluorescent lamps and appliance recycling.

Table 3: Residential New Construction Program Results by Measure For Plan Year 2013 For Plan Year 2014 For Plan Year 2015 22 market saturation. 23 24  2014: Comparing the investment projections presented to stakeholders in 25 December 201...

AI summary This table outlines investment levels and changes in residential new construction programs for the years 2013, 2014, and 2015. It notes that overall investment levels increased by 4% and 11% in 2014 and 2015, respectively, compared to projections from 2011. Changes in program assumptions, such as an increase in the Custom Incentives program budget, are highlighted as factors influencing these increases.

Figure 4.1 Year Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) 2013 97.9 5.7 2014 108.3 7.7 2015 115.2 9.6 2016 122.1 12.2 2017 127.7 14.9 Total 571.2 50.0 Currency is expressed in 2013 dollars. Values may not ad...

AI summary Figure 4.1 presents the energy and demand lifetime benefits from 2013 to 2017, measured in millions of 2013 dollars. The table shows increasing benefits over time, with total energy benefits reaching $571.2 million and total demand benefits reaching $50.0 million.

Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, over the life of the program measures. 13

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits for program measures, expressed as the net present value of avoided costs over the program's lifetime.

Figure 4.2 2013 Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 8.4 0.0 Existing Residential 13.4 1.4 New Residential 7.4 1.0 Energy Savings Actions 1.0 0.0 BUSIN...

AI summary Figure 4.2 presents the energy and demand lifetime benefits of various demand-side management (DSM) programs in 2013, measured in millions of 2013 dollars. The data highlights the net present value of avoided costs over the life of the program measures, with residential and business/non-profit programs showing significant benefits.

Figure 4.4 2015 Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 12.8 0.2 Existing Residential 21.5 3.0 New Residential 11.4 1.7 Energy Savings Actions 1.6 0.0 BUS...

AI summary Figure 4.4 presents the energy and demand lifetime benefits of various DSM programs in 2015, measured in 2013 dollars. The table shows the benefits for residential and business, non-profit, and institutional programs, with total energy benefits amounting to $115.2 million and demand benefits to $9.6 million.

Date Revised: April 18, 2012 1 Request IR-7: 2 3 Reference: Figure 4.1 ENSC Evidence, p. 18 states that "an avoided cost of $135/MWh was 4 provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and 5 capacity." (Also no...

AI summary The document contains a request (IR-7) asking for details on the avoided cost of $135/MWh provided by NSPI, including its components, time frame, and reasoning for identical costs across 2013-2015. The response refers to Synapse reports for supporting calculations and explains that the cost is levelized over 2012-2032, with factors like load and fuel cost considered.

- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-10: 14 programs' TRC values are most likely to be affected by the dual baseline approach? 15 16 Response IR-11: 17 18 a) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 1, filed electronically. 19 20 b) Over the three-...

AI summary The response discusses the impact of the dual baseline approach on the TRC values of energy efficiency programs. It notes that the Energy Savings Actions program has a TRC of 1.0 over three years, with assumptions about measure life and avoided capacity costs affecting the calculation. ENSC acknowledges that their TRC method may need to evolve and references consulting Dunsky Energy Consulting for insights on other jurisdictions' methods.

The data provided in Figures 4.2-4.4 were developed from a spreadsheet model that applies energy and capacity avoided costs that vary year by year. Therefore, ENSC is not able to provide a version of Figures 4.2-4.4 from a singular (leveli...

AI summary The data in Figures 4.2-4.4 are generated from a spreadsheet model that uses varying annual energy and capacity avoided costs, making it impossible for ENSC to provide a levelized version of these figures.

21 With DSM Case No DSM Case 2012 23% 22% 2013 24% 21% 2014 27% 23% 2015 28% 24% 2016 29% 23% 2017 30% 24% 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.32, Recommendation #2, lines 11 – 14, 4 5 a) Please provide details of the specific...

AI summary The document discusses a request (IR-14) related to the Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and its enabling strategies in 2013, including budget allocations for education and outreach, development and research, and other enabling strategies. It also asks for details on how customer classes are identified for cost allocation and any strategies that cannot be directly allocated.

27 o Building Energy Estimation Business Sector 28 o Refrigeration Compressors Business Sector 29 o Air Compressor Systems Business Sector 30 o Refrigerators/Freezers Residential Sector 1 o Clothes Washers Residential Sector 2 o Small Netw...

AI summary The document outlines various sectors and categories of energy-related equipment and discusses the allocation of expenditures for Enabling Strategies, noting that ENSC will adjust cost assignments based on program needs. It also references a request and response related to the funding of DSM programs outside the Electricity DSM Fund.

23 c) The potential loss of significant load would be reflected in NSPI's avoided costs. Please 24 refer to Multeese IR-6 and Synapse IR-14. 1 Request IR-17: 2 3 Reference: 4.4 Capacity Building Programs (Appendix A, pp. 27-28) 4 5 a) Plea...

AI summary The text refers to the potential loss of significant load and its reflection in NSPI's avoided costs, citing Multeese IR-6 and Synapse IR-14. It also includes a request for details on training and associated expenses for capacity building programs for trade allies, with a response providing a table of training programs, participants, and costs for 2013, 2014, and 2015.

Trade Ally Training Programs -2014 Type of Training Specific Program Estimated Number of Participants Entire Cost ENSC Cost Existing Homes Program Update 250 $12,500 $12,500 Skills Training 250 $250,000 $125,000 New Homes Program Update 75...

AI summary The document outlines the costs and participant estimates for various trade ally training programs in 2014, including program updates, skills training, and technical training, with ENSC and NSPI involved in funding and implementation.

24 1 The funding for the national market study on fenestration is shared with the Nova Scotia 2 Department of Energy. The Nova Scotia Department of Energy is providing $5,000 in 3 funding for this study. 4 5 At this time the costs of the i...

AI summary The text discusses funding for a national market study on fenestration shared with the Nova Scotia Department of Energy, and outlines administrative costs related to implementing the National Energy Code for Buildings and new energy-related initiatives. It also references a request (IR-19) asking ENSC to confirm details about enabling strategy allocations in 2012 and 2013.

21 5 Source: 2012 DSM Revised Appendix B Preliminary Program Cost Allocation Request IR-22: Reference: Appendix C, Footnote 1 to Attachment 1-4, Table 2(b) (2013), Attachment 1-9, Table 2(b) (2014) and Attachment 1-14, Table 2(b) (2015), s...

AI summary The document discusses a request for updated forecasts from MEUNSC and NSPI for 2012 and 2013-2015, as well as the use of 2011 actual allocated costs and Enabling Strategies allocation estimates in updating preliminary cost allocation tables.

Reference: Appendix C, Table 3 (2013), (2014) and (2015), Attachments 1-2, 1-10 and 1-15. Please confirm that ENSC is allocating the following program costs to the ELI-2P-RTP

AI summary The document references Appendix C, Table 3 from 2013, 2014, and 2015, along with several attachments, and requests confirmation that ENSC is allocating specific program costs to the ELI-2P-RTP.

1 Request IR-1: 4 5 ENSC is proposing investment levels of $42.3 million in 2013, $43.1 million in 2014, and 6 $45.1 million in 2015 (currency expressed in 2013 dollars). 7 8 a) Please confirm that, if approved, these investment levels wou...

AI summary ENSC proposes energy efficiency investment levels for 2013-2015 and seeks clarification on spending limits and recovery mechanisms. It also requests approval to transfer the responsibility of filing annual adjustments from NSPI to ENSC, with a request for stakeholder feedback.

Request IR-3: Please provide a breakdown, including investment, targets, TRCs and PACS for each sub- program within each of the major program area such as the Green Heating Program and Low Income Program within the Existing Residential Pro...

AI summary The response to Request IR-3 provides a breakdown of investment, targets, TRCs, and PACS for sub-programs within the Existing Residential Program, including the Green Heating Program and Low Income Program. It notes that TRCs for some sub-programs are below 1.0 due to projected lifetime benefits and program structure.

c PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to ENSC's costs. 6 2014 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Gener...

AI summary The text presents a table showing the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) ratio for various residential sub-programs under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), comparing investment, lifetime benefits, and other metrics. The PAC is defined as a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to ENSC's costs.

a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum of ENSC's and parti...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of demand-side management (DSM) programs through metrics like lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC, which compare program benefits to costs. It also includes a request and response regarding program design modifications for the period 2013-15.

- 5 ample opportunity for the UARB and stakeholders to ensure oversight and accountability. 1 Request IR-5: 2 3 Please provide ENSC's views of the impact of a three year program versus a one year 4 program on projected Total Resource Cost...

AI summary ENSC discusses the impact of a three-year versus a one-year program on TRC and PAC tests, suggesting that a longer program cycle may reduce costs and improve ratios. Load forecasts from 2006 to 2011 are provided and compared with earlier IRP forecasts.

Based upon the 2011 load forecast models, the following table shows the relative sensitivity of the forecast to changes in various input assumptions. Variable Assumed Change Effect on 2011 Load GWh Effect on 2016 Load GWh Lagrad Danandant...

AI summary The 2011 load forecast models demonstrate the sensitivity of electricity demand to various input assumptions, such as changes in consumer goods sales, GDP, heating degree-days, and DSM program effects. The table highlights the impact of these variables on both 2011 and 2016 load forecasts in gigawatt-hours.

Commercial Model Input Variables and Contributions 1 2 4 2 J RQTOS RPDI DomEng ComEng [-1] DSM Year RQTOS contrib RPDI contrib DomEng contrib ComEng [-1] Effects ComEng Actual Growth GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh % 1994 19,069 483 16,961 215...

AI summary This table presents input variables and contributions for commercial models over the years, including metrics such as RQTOS, RPDI, DomEng, ComEng, and DSM, along with their growth percentages. It provides a historical overview of energy consumption and related economic indicators from 1994 to 2019.

Note: Statistics Canada often re-estimates historical information to reconcile with changes in variable composition and to ensure historical consistency with forecasts. This is the case in the graph above. Nova Scotia Power Inc. Figure B2:...

AI summary The text presents several figures related to Nova Scotia's economic and energy data, including consumer goods sales, real disposable income, energy sales, energy losses, energy requirements, and peak demand. These figures are sourced from Statistics Canada and are subject to historical re-estimation for consistency.

Based upon the 2009 load forecast models, the following table shows the relative sensitivity of the forecast to changes in various input assumptions. Variable Assumed Change Effect on 2010 Load GWh Effect on 2015 Load GWh Lagged Dependent...

AI summary The text presents a table showing the sensitivity of load forecasts to various input assumptions based on 2009 models. The table details the impact of variables like GDP, income, electricity prices, and DSM programs on load forecasts for 2010 and 2015.

This report describes considerations, assumptions and methodology used in the preparation of the Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) IRP load forecast. It provides an outlook on the energy and peak demand requirements of in-province customers fo...

AI summary This report outlines the methodology and assumptions used in the Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) load forecast for 2006 to 2029. It discusses historical sales, weather, economic indicators, and technological changes. The forecast includes base case, high, and low scenarios, with the Net System Requirement (NSR) projected to increase from 12,338 GWh in 2005 to 18,638 GWh in 2029, and peak demand rising from 2143 MW in 2005 to 3323 MW in 2029.

- 10 numbers refer to the numbers as listed in Appendix I of each evaluation report. Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement PP 15: Increase the number of in-depth interviews with home builders. ENSC will have its third-party evaluator i...

AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document outlines various program improvements and operational adjustments, including increasing the number of in-depth interviews with home builders, enhancing data management practices, and improving on-site visits for energy efficiency measures. It also mentions the inclusion of program portfolio information in cheque mail-outs.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum o...

AI summary The text discusses metrics for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including net present value of avoided costs, benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC), and program-specific data such as investment, energy savings, and demand reductions for residential sub-programs like Low Income, Direct Install Existing Homes, and Green Heat.

$\begin{array}{cc} 1 & \text{Medium Industrial} \\ 2 & \end{array}$ Year GDP_Man $M2002 Man_Emp GDP_Man contrib GWh Man_Emp contrib GWh Med_Ind [-1] Med_Ind [-1] contrib GWh Med_Ind Model GWh Med_Ind Actual GWh Growth % 1994 1,877 486 116....

AI summary This table presents data on medium industrial energy consumption and economic indicators from 1994 to 2021. It includes GDP, employment, energy consumption, and growth metrics, with a note about a model adjustment in 2010 to align forecasts with actuals.

Residential Model Input Variables and Contributions Year AIDX AIDX Contrib. CHDD CHDD Contrib. Electric Price Electric Price Contrib. Consumer Goods Sales Consumer Goods Contrib. DomEng [-1] DomEng [-1] Contrib. Nat. Gas Effect DSM DomEng...

AI summary The table presents input variables and contributions for a residential model, including factors like Annual Index (AIDX), Customer Heating Degree Days (CHDD), electric price, consumer goods sales, and Demand Energy (DomEng) from 1994 to 2019. It also includes adjustments for forecast alignment in 2009-2019.

Based upon the 2009 load forecast models, the following table shows the relative sensitivity of the forecast to changes in various input assumptions. Variable Assumed Change Effect on 2010 Load GWh Effect on 2015 Load GWh Lagged Dependent...

AI summary The table outlines the sensitivity of load forecasts to various input assumptions based on 2009 models. It highlights how changes in variables like GDP, heating degree-days, and DSM program effects significantly impact forecasted load in 2010 and 2015.

- 10 numbers refer to the numbers as listed in Appendix I of each evaluation report. Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement EEH 12: Create a list of pre-approved contractors. ENSC is in the process of developing a pre-approved contracto...

AI summary The document outlines actions taken by ENSC in response to various evaluation report numbers, including creating a list of pre-approved contractors, improving billing analysis for energy consumption estimates, defining project status in tracking sheets, emphasizing energy bill savings in communications, promoting natural gas systems, and implementing data management system changes for the Low Income program.

Yes, as part of ongoing mid-course corrections, ENSC would adjust program targets to reflect experience gained in the previous year. Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-17 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-18: 2 3 Please provide ENSC"s evaluation...

AI summary ENSC is adjusting program targets based on previous year experience and is in the process of developing its evaluation plan for Enabling Strategies, specifically Codes and Standards, which is the only Enabling Strategy for which energy savings will be claimed in 2012.

Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-23 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-23: 23 24 b) Please refer to part a. 25 26 c) Please refer to part a. 1 Request IR-27: 2 3 The bill-impact tables in Appendix C, Attachment 3, do not appear to reflect eithe...

AI summary The document addresses a request regarding the impact of energy-efficiency programs on billing tables. The response indicates that demand-side management (DSM) impacts are already included in load forecasts and billing determinants. However, the requested tables reflecting avoided costs were not provided as they are not part of the DSM rate rider calculations.

Cc: Mike Sampson, Director Planning and Performance Low Bookend High Bookena 2012 Avoided Cost of DSM (Revised Sub-set of 2009 IRP Update Avoided Cost of DSM (2009 IRP Update Assumptions) 2012 Avoided Cost of DSM (Revised Sub-set of 2009 I...

AI summary The document presents a comparison of avoided costs associated with demand-side management (DSM) between 2012 and 2010, focusing on energy and capacity. It highlights changes in assumptions, including the removal of certain loads and revised timelines for avoiding natural gas units, which impact the calculated avoided costs.

- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-7: 2 3 With respect to Figures 4.3 and 4.4, it is noted that currency is in 2013 dollars. Are the total 4 expenditures shown in those Figures the expenditures for which ENSC is seeking approval 5 in this procee...

AI summary The document discusses a request and response regarding the translation of expenditures from 2013 dollars to 2014 and 2015 dollars using an annual inflation rate, and another request for assumptions and calculations supporting energy savings estimates from updated Codes and Standards.

- savings are based on the program results for 2011, corrected to account for a market penetration - of 100 percent. - Gross and net standard savings - The new regulation may potentially lead some businesses to stockpile T12 lamps in order...

AI summary The document discusses adjustments to energy savings estimates for lighting programs, considering market penetration, free-ridership, and changes in building energy codes. It highlights the impact of the 2011 NECB on energy consumption reductions and the correction of data to reflect current construction trends.

PO Box 910 • Halifax, Nova Scotia • Canada • B3J 2W5 February 21, 2012 By email: [email protected] Allan Crandlemire, CEO Efficiency Nova Scotia 230 Brownlow Avenue, Suite 300 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, B3B 0G5 Re: Avoided Cost of...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power has calculated the 2012 avoided costs of DSM, taking into account uncertainty in load assumptions due to the operations of NSPI's largest customers. A range of avoided costs was calculated for two scenarios: a high bookend and a low bookend. ENSC provided revised projections for future DSM savings, which were used in both scenarios. The methodology used was similar to the 2009 IRP Update, with some assumptions updated.

- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-7: 2 3 With respect to Figures 4.3 and 4.4, it is noted that currency is in 2013 dollars. Are the total 4 expenditures shown in those Figures the expenditures for which ENSC is seeking approval 5 in this procee...

AI summary The document discusses the inflation adjustments applied to expenditures in 2014 and 2015, expressed in 2013 dollars, and references assumptions and calculations for energy savings from updated Codes and Standards. ENSC is seeking approval for these adjustments.

- apartment buildings are not subject to the residential building code. - Gross standard savings - According to the Ministry of Labour and Workforce Development, compliance with the new - energy code has been significant to date. Although...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of new energy code compliance and lighting regulations on energy savings. It outlines assumptions about compliance rates, bulb replacement potential, and the effects of lighting changes on energy consumption, including considerations of indoor/outdoor usage and space heating fuel.

Figure 4.2 2013 Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a TRC Lifetime Costs ($ million) b TRC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ million) c Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PRO GRAMS Efficient Product Rebates e 7.1 5.0 2.1 1.4 Existing Reside...

AI summary Figure 4.2 presents a table summarizing the lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia from 2013. The table includes residential and business programs, as well as enabling strategies, with metrics such as TRC Lifetime Costs and TRC Lifetime Net Benefits.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text defines key financial metrics for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, lifetime costs, the TRC benefit/cost ratio, and lifetime net benefits. It also notes the inclusion of low-income household participation.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text defines key financial metrics used to evaluate energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, lifetime costs, lifetime net benefits, and the TRC ratio, which compare avoided costs and program expenses over the program's lifetime.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text defines key metrics for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, costs, net benefits, and the TRC ratio, which compares benefits to total costs incurred by both ENSC and participants. It also notes the inclusion of low-income household participation.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text explains how lifetime benefits and costs are calculated for energy efficiency programs, including net present value of avoided energy and capacity costs, administrative and incentive costs, and a benefit/cost ratio (PAC). It also notes that low-income household participation is included in the analysis.

Figure 4.3 2014 Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a PAC Lifetime Costs ($ million) b PAC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ million) c Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRA MS Efficient Product Rebates e 8.2 4.0 4.1 2.0 Existing...

AI summary Figure 4.3 presents a table summarizing the lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business programs, as well as enabling strategies. The data is expressed in 2013 dollars and includes metrics such as the Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC program administ...

AI summary The text defines key financial metrics used in evaluating energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, lifetime costs, lifetime net benefits, and the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test, which compares benefits to program costs. It also notes the inclusion of low-income household participation.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits for energy efficiency programs, emphasizing net present value and the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test as a benefit/cost ratio.

12 Rate Class 2013 2014 2015 10 identified in the 2009 IRP Update could be achieved by investing $90 million annually, ENSC's 11 view is that this is unrealistic given the current stage of DSM development in Nova Scotia. 12 Further to its...

AI summary The document discusses the feasibility of achieving energy savings targets outlined in the 2009 IRP Update, with ENSC arguing that the proposed DSM budgets are unrealistic given the current state of energy efficiency development in Nova Scotia. It also references a request for clarification on the calculation of avoided costs by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated.

- 10 energy savings for each energy efficiency measure over the total program energy savings. 2014 Average Measure Life RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 6.2 Existing Residential 15.3 New Residential 22.0 Energy Savings Ac...

AI summary The text presents average measure life values for various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business programs, with a focus on energy savings measures. The data is organized in a table and relates to a request labeled IR-6.

Figure 4.2 2013 Lifetime Benefits ($ millions) a TRC Lifetime Costs ($ millions) b TRC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ millions) c Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGR RAMS Efficient Product Rebates e 8.4 5.1 3.3 1.6 Existing Re...

AI summary Figure 4.2 presents a table summarizing the lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of various demand-side management (DSM) programs in 2013, including residential, business, and enabling strategies. The data highlights the financial impact of these programs, with residential and business programs showing positive net benefits, while enabling strategies show negative net benefits.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text defines various economic metrics used in evaluating energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, lifetime costs, lifetime net benefits, and the TRC (Total Resource Cost) ratio, which compares benefits to total costs incurred by both ENSC and participants, including low-income households.

Figure 4.3 2014 Lifetime Benefits ($ millions) a TRC Lifetime Costs ($ millions) b TRC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ millions) c Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGR RAMS Efficient Product Rebates e 10.0 5.3 4.7 1.9 Existing R...

AI summary Figure 4.3 presents a summary of the lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business initiatives. The table highlights the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test results for each program category.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text defines various metrics used to evaluate energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, costs, net benefits, and the Total Resource Cost (TRC) ratio, which compares benefits to combined program and participant costs. It also notes the inclusion of low-income households in participation.

Figure 4.4 2015 Lifetime Benefits ($ millions) a TRC Lifetime Costs ($ millions) b TRC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ millions) c Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PROG RAMS Efficient Product Rebates e 13.0 7.2 5.8 1.8 Existing Re...

AI summary Figure 4.4 presents a summary of the lifetime benefits and costs of various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. The table highlights the TRC Lifetime Costs and Net Benefits for different residential and business programs, with the overall TRC Test result indicating a positive outcome of 1.7.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text defines key metrics for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including lifetime benefits, costs, net benefits, and the Total Resource Cost (TRC) ratio. It emphasizes the inclusion of low-income households in participation and the use of net present value calculations.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC progra...

AI summary The text explains how lifetime benefits and costs are calculated for energy efficiency programs, including net present value and benefit/cost ratios. It also notes the inclusion of low-income household participation in these calculations.

An avoided cost of $135/MWh was provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and capacity. a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over t...

AI summary The text discusses the avoided cost of $135/MWh provided by NSPI in 2012, including energy and capacity costs. It also outlines how lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits are calculated, as well as the PAC benefit/cost ratio and participation by low-income households.

& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. b Lifetime costs are expressed as the net present value of ENSC program adminis...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of energy efficiency programs, including the use of net present value and a benefit/cost ratio (PAC) to evaluate program effectiveness.

12 Rate Class 2013 2014 2015 10 identified in the 2009 IRP Update could be achieved by investing $90 million annually, ENSC's 11 view is that this is unrealistic given the current stage of DSM development in Nova Scotia. 12 Further to its...

AI summary The text discusses the feasibility of achieving energy savings targets set in the 2009 IRP Update, with ENSC expressing skepticism about the realism of these goals given the current state of DSM development in Nova Scotia. A response estimates that a five percent DSM budget would result in approximately 200 GWh of annual energy savings.

Table 1: Parameters for Screw-In (<=15W) Efficient Products, Replace on Burnout, Retail Markdown Comment Revision (BOLD) NPV of Demand Avoided Costs for Measure Life of 19 years = $0.00/kW (Note: Capacity Avoided Costs are zero for 2013 th...

AI summary The document discusses the Net Present Value (NPV) of demand avoided costs for efficient screw-in products, noting that the measure life was initially set to 19 years but should be adjusted to 7 years, as capacity avoided costs were zero from 2013 to 2019. The adjustment does not change the final result.

Parameter Impact of Error ENSC Investment ($) Understated by $3.9M (8.4%) Lifetime Benefits ($) Understated by $13.8M (13.3%) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No change Program Administrator Cost Test (TRC) Understated by 0.1 (4.5%) Table 2:...

AI summary The table outlines the impact of errors on 2013 projected results, showing that ENSC investment and lifetime benefits were understated by significant percentages, while the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) remained unchanged and the Program Administrator Cost Test (TRC) was understated by a smaller percentage.

Forecast Planning Reserve Margin With DSM Case No DSM Case 2 3 Reference: ENSC (Avon) IR-14(d), lines 13-15 4 5 Please describe qualitatively and quantitatively by what objective measure as expenditures 6 occur, "ENSC will "consider" the a...

AI summary The document discusses how ENSC will assign costs for Education and Outreach and Development and Research expenditures on a case-by-case basis, considering the affected rate classes. Examples are provided, such as how the Green Schools program benefits multiple sectors.

11 12 In 2011, ENSC incurred administrative costs related to startup of ENSC's operations of 13 $591,393. These have been identified separately above as they are not expected to be ongoing 14 administrative costs. Actual administration cos...

AI summary In 2011, ENSC incurred significant administrative costs during the startup of its operations, totaling $591,393. These costs are not expected to be ongoing. ENSC estimates that administrative costs will be around 10% of total DSM investment from 2012 to 2015. Total salary and benefit costs for 2011 were $3,048,748, with $2,473,874 allocated to DSM programs and support.

customer financial incentive, program administration costs and the NTG ratio are the same under the two delivery approaches. 9 This can be seen from the numerical 7 See D.06-06-063, p. 72. 8 As we note in Section 10, the SPM defines the "p...

AI summary The text discusses the comparison of two delivery approaches for customer financial incentives, program administration costs, and the NTG ratio. It references the SPM and PG&E's comments on the TRC test, highlighting differences in perspectives on cost-effectiveness and rebate definitions.

10 2001 SPM , p. 18. (emphasis added.) 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 With respect to Figure 4.2 as filed on April 18, the energy savings for each program are the 4 same as the initial filing on February 27 and the March 30 revision. However, for Ex...

AI summary The response to Request IR-14 explains that the increase in costs for energy efficiency programs is due to a correction of an error in the Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model (RAM Tool), which had previously underestimated incentive costs for free riders. The correction led to a small change in energy and demand savings.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-18: For each program and for each rate class, please provide planned and actual efficiency budgets for 2008 through 2012. Response IR-18: Please refer to Attachment 1. DSM programs did not allocate costs by rate...

AI summary The response to Request IR-18 provides planned and actual efficiency budgets for DSM programs from 2008 through 2012, noting that cost allocation by rate class was not implemented until 2010, so data is provided by program only for 2008-2009.

Date Filed: May 9, 2012 ENSC Synapse IR-18 Page 1 of 1 2008-2009 Budget/ Actual Existing Homes New Homes Efficient Products Low Income Prescriptive Rebates Custom (incl. New Construction) Small Business Direct Install Education & Outreach...

AI summary This document presents a financial summary of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) programs for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, including budget and actual figures across various program categories such as existing homes, new homes, efficient products, low-income initiatives, and education and outreach.

Source (Actuals): 2011 DSM Plan Filed February 26, 2010 2010 Budget/ Actual Existing Homes New Homes Efficient Products Low Income Prescriptive Rebates Custom (incl. New Construction) Small Business Direct Install Education & Outreach Deve...

AI summary The document presents a summary of the 2011 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan, including budget and actual figures for various programs and categories, such as existing homes, new homes, efficient products, low-income initiatives, and more. It includes detailed financial allocations and expenditures for different segments of the DSM program.

Source (Actuals): 2012 DSM Cost Recovery Rider filed Oct. 21, 2011 Budget/ 2011 Actual Existing Homes New Homes Efficient Products Low Income Prescriptive Rebates Custom (incl. New Construction) Small Business Direct Install Education & Ou...

AI summary The 2012 DSM Cost Recovery Rider outlines budget and actual spending across various programs and categories, including residential, small general, general demand, and large general segments. It provides a detailed breakdown of costs associated with existing homes, new homes, efficient products, low-income initiatives, and other program areas.

Source (Actuals): Rate Code Allocation Preliminary Actuals Updated March 26, 2012 and 2011 Audited Program Expenditures 2012 (Forecast) Existing New Homes Homes1 Efficient Products Home Energy Report Prescriptive Rebates Custom (incl. New...

AI summary This document provides a detailed breakdown of program expenditures for 2012 and 2011, including categories such as residential, small general, large industrial, and municipal. It outlines the allocation of costs across various energy efficiency and demand-side management initiatives.

EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 3 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 Electricity Demand Side Management Fund $ Capital Asset Fund $ General Fund $ Provincial Fund $ 2011 $ 2010 $ RE...

AI summary The document presents the Statement of Operations and Changes in Fund Balances for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011, detailing revenues and costs across various funds including the Electricity Demand Side Management Fund, Capital Asset Fund, General Fund, and Provincial Fund.

17. COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY The Corporation engages in electricity demand-side management ("EDSM Fund") and other energy efficiency and conservation programs ("Provincial Fund"). The costs in each fund include direct costs of the progr...

AI summary The Corporation manages EDSM and Provincial Fund programs, allocating costs based on FTEs and direct costs, with oversight by the UARB. This methodology includes joint and common costs, administrative overhead, and salary expenses.

11 COMMENT? 12 13 Yes. There are two areas of ENSC's proposal which warrant further comment. 14 - 15 The first area is the proposed expenditures. ENSC has filed its proposed expenditures in - 16 constant 2013 dollar. In ENSC(Multeese) IR-7...

AI summary The document indicates that there are two areas of ENSC's proposal requiring further comment, specifically regarding proposed expenditures presented in both constant 2013 dollars and current dollars, with differences outlined in Table 1.

21 As Filed (Constant $M) As per ENSC(Multeese) IR-7 (Current $M) 2013 46.2 46.2 2014 47.7 48.7 2015 50.4 52.5 22

AI summary The table presents financial figures for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) from 2013 to 2015, comparing 'As Filed' values with those from the IR-7 report by ENSC (Multeese). The figures show a consistent increase in costs over the years.

7 Table 1: Embedded Allocation of Generation Costs (thousands of dollars) Total Demand Energy $1000 % $1000 % Generation-Related $917,570 $155,095 16.9% $762,476 83.1% 8 Source: SR01 (the COS study), Exhibit 5 in the 2013 GRA

AI summary Table 1 presents the embedded allocation of generation costs, showing total generation-related costs of $917,570, with $155,095 (16.9%) allocated to demand and $762,476 (83.1%) to energy. The data is sourced from SR01 (the COS study), Exhibit 5 in the 2013 GRA.

Q. Have you reviewed the Company's evidence in this docket? - A. Yes. I have read the evidence filed by the Corporation, including the proposed 2013-15 - DSM plan, plan revisions, and attached reports. I have also reviewed information requ...

AI summary The reviewer has examined ENSC's evidence in the docket and concludes that the proposed DSM investment for 2013-2015 is lower than what was recommended by the IRP and witnesses. ENSC argues that increasing investment is limited by the capacity to deliver energy efficiency services rather than budget size, and that achieving higher savings would require more customer demand and service capacity.

Q. Do you have any concerns about free ridership? - A. Yes. There are a small number of programs that account for the majority of the increase - in investment between the initial filing on February 27 and the March 30 revision. As noted in...

AI summary The witness expresses concerns about free ridership in certain programs, noting significant cost increases in energy efficiency initiatives. ENSC acknowledges an error in its Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model that led to understated costs, particularly for free riders. The testimony also addresses ENSC's budget administration, suggesting a management audit and improved budget transparency.

2 4 56 Q. Please provide a summary of your residential bill impact analysis. A. The effect on a customers' bill depends on whether or not a customer participates in the DSM programs. Through participation in efficiency programs, a customer...

AI summary The residential bill impact analysis shows that non-participants experience a 3-4% increase in bills initially, while program participants see reductions of over 10% initially and up to 15% later. On average, bills for all customers are expected to decrease by 0.6% over the study period due to efficiency programs.

the performance incentives resulting from an energy efficiency program are changed by 20 percent. 2 1 ENSC recommends that it continue to meet quarterly with the Board. Regular 26 a new program is added to the portfolio of programs;  27 a...

AI summary The document discusses changes to energy efficiency programs, including adding new programs, terminating existing ones, altering budgets by 20 percent, and modifying program savings by 20 percent. ENSC recommends regular quarterly meetings with the Board.

Direct Testimony of Tim Woolf Page 30 1 Q. Please explain why you believe these prospective triggers are important. 2 A. ENSC may want to add a new program or terminate an existing program during 3 the course of the three-year plan, and th...

AI summary Tim Woolf emphasizes the importance of prospective triggers for energy efficiency programs, recommending triggers for efficiency budgets and savings at the sector level to ensure equity and regulatory oversight. He suggests a 25% trigger level and outlines how the Board should respond to notifications in Annual Progress Reports.

Developing Integrated Resource Planning Policies in the European Community , Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, Energy and Environment Issue, Vol. 1, Issue 2. 1992. Testimony of Tim Woolf Exhibit TW-2 Page 1 of...

AI summary The document contains a table with customer and rate class information for residential customers, including customer numbers, sales, consumption, growth rates, and energy charges. Data spans from 2013 to 2015, with sources cited for each entry.

Table 2 ENSC Proposal and Outlook Year Investment ($Millions) Incremental Energy Saving (GWh) Incremental Demand Saving (MW) TRC Ratio Proposed 2013 $46.2 135.2 25.9 1.6 2014 47.7 137.8 27.0 1.7 2015 50.4 137.8 27.0 1.7 Total $144.3 410.8...

AI summary The table outlines the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) proposed investments and energy savings from 2013 to 2017. It highlights the Total Resource Cost (TRC) ratio and compares actual energy savings to forecasts. The text notes that economic factors have significantly reduced energy use, and NSPI's 2013 Rates Application reflects a decline in load due to economic conditions and the Port Hawkesbury paper mill's potential load reduction.

Table 3 Forecast 2013 DSM Cost and Saving Cost ($Millions) Incremental Energy Savings (GWh) Unit Cost $/MWh 2008 Plan $78.2 371.8 $210 2010 Plan 22.9 82.7 277 2013 Plan $46.2 135.2 $341 At the same time, the value of DSM, as measured by av...

AI summary Table 3 provides a forecast of DSM cost and savings from 2008 to 2013, showing an increase in unit cost. The value of DSM is decreasing due to reduced fossil-fired plant output and an increase in renewables, which are 'must take' and thus increase costs.

- 2013 , as compared to the "with DSM" forecast of GWh. Lingan 2, which is forecast11 1 to have 2013 output of GWh in the "with DSM" forecast is now only forecast to 2 have output of GWh (a capacity factor) in the 2013 GRA. 3 Another indic...

AI summary The document discusses discrepancies in avoided energy cost estimates, specifically highlighting a reduction in load forecast by NSPI and its impact on fuel savings. It also addresses anomalies in the avoided cost backup data, including a mismatch between DSM load reduction and generation forecasts, and the lack of complete data on unit performance.

Note that on Table 5 we see that the avoided energy cost jumps from /MWh11 in 2014 to /MWh in 2015. This may be related to the mismatch between load12 reduction and generation reduction in 2015 shown in Table 8.13

AI summary The text notes a jump in avoided energy cost from /MWh11 in 2014 to /MWh in 2015, possibly due to a mismatch between load12 reduction and generation reduction in 2015 as shown in Table 8.13.

16 Q PLEASE GIVE SOME EXAMPLES. A The most obvious program is the "Solar Hot Water Heater, replacing electric water17 heater" measure. It has a TRC ratio of 0.5 with the avoided costs as applied for. This18 program on its own has a negativ...

AI summary The response provides examples of programs with negative benefits, such as the Solar Hot Water Heater program and low-income renovation retrofit measures, which have negative annual benefits of nearly $1 million and $600 thousand respectively.

1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Please provide details of how ENSC plans to obtain the stakeholder views on program design and implementation that was formerly provided by the Program Development Working Group. 4 5 Request IR-2: 6 7 Please describe th...

AI summary The document outlines several requests related to energy efficiency programs, including stakeholder engagement, program design, program breakdowns, load forecasts, and the impact of multi-year versus one-year programs on cost tests.

21 Request IR-7 - Reference: Figure 4.1 ENSC Evidence, p. 18 states that "an avoided cost of $135/MWh was22 - provided by NSPI in February 2012 and includes the combined cost of energy and capacity."23 - (Also noted in Figures 4.2, 4.3 and...

AI summary The document contains a series of requests for information related to avoided costs and methodology used in the development of DSM plans and rate applications. It asks for supporting data, explanations for cost consistency across years, and clarification on the differences in avoided cost calculations between various plans and scenarios.

22 Request IR-14 - Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.32, Recommendation #2, lines 11 14,23 - (a) Please provide details of the specific measures to be undertaken, the target24 market and budgets for each measure in 2013 (from Figure 4.2):25 - (i...

AI summary The document contains a series of requests related to the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and its programs, including details on budgets, cost allocation, enabling strategies, and the impact of industrial shutdowns on DSM plans. It also requests information on training programs, government collaboration, and funding sources for studies and evaluations.

14 Figure 1 – 2012 DSM Plan Expenditures and Evaluated Energy Savings 2012 Plan as Filed Mid‐Course Adjustment Actual Budget ($ million) Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Budget ($ million) Incremental Annual Net Ene...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing the expenditures and evaluated energy savings from the 2012 DSM Plan, including previous programs, enabling strategies, residential programs, and BNI DSM programs. It highlights budget figures, incremental annual net energy savings, and actual expenditures and savings for each category.

11 Figure 2 – 2013 Mid-Course Adjustments 2013 Plan Targets as Filed Mid‐Course Adjustment Expenditures ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Expenditures1 ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 4.0 18.1 5.2 15.4...

AI summary Figure 2 outlines the 2013 Mid-Course Adjustments for residential and business DSM programs, showing expenditures and energy savings targets. The table compares planned versus actual figures, highlighting changes in spending and energy savings across various programs.

1 Figure 3 – Summary of the 2013 and 2014 Evaluation Schedule 2013 2014 Program Components Impact Evaluation Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation Process Evaluation Residential Appliance Retirement Yes Yes No No Efficient Product Rebates I...

AI summary Figure 3 outlines the evaluation schedule for various programs in 2013 and 2014, including appliance retirement, efficient product rebates, home energy assessments, and others. It details whether impact and process evaluations were conducted for each program component during these years.

Utility and Review Board of Nova Scotia Line # TABLE 1 (2014) Alloca ation of 25% of p rogram cos sts associated d with system ber nefit 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Residential 4 Small General General Demand Large General Small Ind...

AI summary The document presents a table (Table 1 from 2014) that allocates 25% of program costs associated with system benefits across various categories, including residential, industrial, and municipal sectors. It includes figures for energy requirements, energy-related costs, and relative shares for each category.

Table 6: NTGRs Estimated for 2012 Program NTGR Appliance Retirement (ARet) 0.84 Regular CFLs 0.70 Instant Savings LED Lamps 0.87 Clothes Washers 0.70 Home Energy Assessment (HEA) 0.70 Fuel Substitution 0.69 Low Income Homeowner Service (LI...

AI summary Table 6 presents estimated Net-to-Gross Ratios (NTGRs) for various energy efficiency programs in 2012, including Appliance Retirement, Instant Savings, Home Energy Assessment, and others. The table indicates varying NTGRs across different programs and subcategories, with some programs achieving a 1.00 NTGR, suggesting full program effectiveness.

2.3 INDIVIDUAL IMPACT EVALUATION RESULTS Table 9 illustrates the evaluated savings, the net savings targets revised in March 2012 and the savings tracked internally by ENSC for each program offered by ENSC in 2012. Specific observations re...

AI summary Table 9 presents evaluated savings, revised net savings targets from March 2012, and internally tracked savings by ENSC for each program offered in 2012. Additional observations on specific programs and initiatives are discussed.

Table 9: 2012 Evaluated Results, Targets and Tracked Savings for Each Program (Energy and Demand Savings at the Generator) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Evaluated EN ISC Evaluated EN ISC DSM PROGRAM Initial Gross Savings Install...

AI summary Table 9 presents evaluated results, targets, and tracked savings for various energy and demand-saving programs in 2012. It includes metrics such as energy savings (in GWh), demand savings (in MW), and net-to-gross ratios (NTGR) for programs like Appliance Retirement (ARET), Instant Savings, and Residential Direct Install (RDI). The data highlights discrepancies between targets and actual savings, particularly for programs like LHLE and Residential Solar.

Business Energy Rebates For the mail-in rebate component of BER, the net energy and demand savings evaluated for 2012 were slightly lower than those tracked by ENSC, respectively by 7 percent and 3 percent. This could mainly be explained b...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy and demand savings for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012. Mail-in rebates showed slightly lower savings than tracked by ENSC, while instant rebates showed higher savings. Adjustments, diversity factors, and NTGR values were used to refine the estimates of savings.

Custom New Construction The net energy savings at the generator calculated by Econoler are approximately 22 percent lower than those tracked by ENSC. This difference is mainly due to the NTGR ratio established as part of this year's evalua...

AI summary The net energy savings calculated by Econoler are 22% lower than those tracked by ENSC, mainly due to the NTGR ratio. The peak demand savings difference is 33%, influenced by adjustments in diversity factors and discrepancies in project claims. Free-ridership is also noted, with participants implementing energy efficiency measures for reasons beyond the program.

Business Energy Solutions Overall, the net energy savings evaluated for BES fell short of those tracked by ENSC by 2 percent. This result can be explained by the adjustments applied in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) gross savin...

AI summary The net energy savings for Business Energy Solutions (BES) were 2% lower than those tracked by ENSC, due to adjustments in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) gross savings calculation. Additionally, differences in demand savings evaluation arose from the application of a diversity factor of 80% by Econoler.

Table 13: General Recommendations on Evaluation Plan No. Recommendations OV-R7. Adapt the evaluation plan template to meet program needs: In the program base case, some programs, such as Fuel Substitution, have many measures to describe, f...

AI summary The evaluation plan template should be adapted to meet the specific needs of different programs, particularly for programs like Fuel Substitution and Custom Retrofit, where the base case may not be appropriate. Additionally, the base case content should be updated regularly to ensure accuracy, using variables such as hours of operation and installation rates.

Table 24: Recommendations for Business Energy Rebates No. Recommendations BER-R3. Define different full load hours values according to building characteristics: Currently, for HVAC measures, ENSC uses two typical full load hours values to...

AI summary The document recommends defining different full load hours values based on building characteristics to improve the accuracy of energy savings estimates for HVAC measures. Current methods use generalized values, but on-site visits revealed inconsistencies and inaccuracies in data entry. A reference table is suggested to account for factors such as building type and temperature set points.

Table 25: Recommendations for Custom Retrofit No. Recommendations Custom-R4. Promote more active and extensive use of the M&V procedures: Standard Custom Retrofit projects must have an M&V plan compliant with the IPMVP (Section 6.7 of the...

AI summary The document recommends promoting the use of M&V procedures in custom retrofit projects, emphasizing compliance with IPMVP standards. It highlights the lack of satisfactory M&V plans in most evaluated projects and suggests that M&V should be prioritized for large projects and those involving industrial equipment. Early definition of M&V procedures during project planning is also recommended to ensure accurate baseline data collection.

The 2012 evaluation of BES demonstrated that the program is well-designed and generates important electric savings. The program underwent structural changes in 2012. Indeed, BES is now comprised of two components: SBES and CDI. SBES carrie...

AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Building Efficiency Program (BES) found it well-designed and effective in generating electric savings. The program was restructured into SBES and CDI in 2012, with SBES offering partial cost reimbursement and CDI providing no-cost support. ENSC was successful in program communication, with CDI participants learning about it more through ENSC, while SBES participants relied more on contractors and word of mouth. Both components achieved high participant satisfaction, though SBES had higher satisfaction levels. Participants suggested improvements such as increased advertising and faster processing.

Table 27: Recommendations for Business Energy Solutions No. Recommendations BES-R1. Improve the tracking sheet to allow for a better validation of savings: Both SBES and CDI tracking sheets show some improvements on last year's version. In...

AI summary The table outlines recommendations for improving the tracking sheet used in the Business Energy Solutions program. Key improvements include detailed tracking of lighting products, automatic savings calculations, and collecting specific data on insulation and heating sources to enhance validation and accuracy.

Programs Bibliographic References Business Energy Rebates (BER) Ontario Power Authority (OPA), "2011 Quasi-Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions," Release Version 1, December 2010. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, "Technical Referen...

AI summary The document lists various programs and their associated bibliographic references, including Business Energy Rebates (BER), Custom Retrofit, Custom New Construction (NC), and Business Energy Solutions (BES), along with citations from organizations such as the Ontario Power Authority and Hydro-Québec.

2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information Analyzing program documentation was the first task in the process evaluation for ARet. At this stage, all of the available program information was reviewed. The information used to conduct this...

AI summary The first task in the process evaluation for ARet involved analyzing program documentation. Information was primarily obtained from the ENSC website, Program Manual, and Tracking Sheet.

3.4.2 Relationship with Partners Furthermore, when questioned about their level of satisfaction with their relationship with ENSC staff, all DAs stated they were highly satisfied and pointed out it was a fantastic team to work with. All DA...

AI summary All DAs expressed high satisfaction with their relationship with ENSC staff and with each other. The only suggestion was to improve communication between ARCA and the call centre to enhance program efficiency. The call centre DA also praised the Enerpath booking system.

4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the program for 2012. Both energy and demand savings were considered in this evaluation. To do so, Econoler revi...

AI summary The impact evaluation aims to determine the gross and net savings of the program for 2012, considering both energy and demand savings. Econoler reviewed parameters such as unitary savings values, demand-to-energy ratio, interactive effects, free-ridership, and internal spillover, using metering data, literature reviews, and participant surveys.

4.2 GROSS SAVINGS For the 2011 evaluation of ARet, Econoler established average unitary savings values for each type of appliance. For refrigerators and freezers, the unitary savings values were based on the energy consumption data obtaine...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from appliance retirements, specifically refrigerators, freezers, and room air conditioners. In 2011, Econoler used metering data to calculate unitary savings values, but for room air conditioners, data were inconclusive due to non-representative conditions. In 2012, ENSC attempted new metering but encountered issues, leading to reliance on previous data and participant surveys for revised savings values.

Occupant Adjustment Factor In the 2011 evaluation, the conditions under which the appliances were measured at the recycling facility are quite similar to that found in Nova Scotia's households, with a room temperature set at 25°C. The majo...

AI summary The 2011 evaluation used an occupant adjustment factor of 1.12, based on an average of 2.5 people per household, to account for increased energy consumption due to door openings. This factor was derived from the New York metering protocol and will be used again in the 2012 evaluation as the average household size remains unchanged.

Partial Use Factors For secondary refrigerators, Econoler established partial use factors to account for the fact that not all refrigerators are plugged in year-round. Secondary refrigerators are likely to be unplugged for a portion of the...

AI summary Econoler established partial use factors for secondary refrigerators to account for their intermittent use throughout the year, adjusting energy savings calculations. These factors were derived from participant survey data, which identified four plug-in patterns. Primary refrigerators, being used all year, were assumed to have a 100% partial use factor.

CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of ARet demonstrated that the program is well designed and that it underwent a series of positive changes aimed at improving its design and implementation. Notably, the program has excluded dehumidifiers from...

AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program highlighted its improved design and implementation, including the exclusion of dehumidifiers for cost-effectiveness and the inclusion of AIR MILES® reward points. The program's reorganization into two delivery agents increased participant satisfaction. ENSC's efforts in advertising, communication, and program promotion led to high participation and satisfaction levels, with 7,976 units retired in 2012 and significant energy and demand savings achieved.

APPENDIX I - RECOMMENDATIONS Sections Recommendations 3. Collect information on the manufacture year of refrigerators and freezers, as well as the capacity of room air conditioners : Where available, the Evaluator recommends collecting the...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends collecting the manufacture year of refrigerators and freezers, as well as the capacity of room air conditioners, to improve the accuracy of unitary savings calculations in the program. This information should be included in the main tracking sheet for better data analysis.

Air Conditioner Unit Free-Ridership [AFR Series] Please continue thinking about just that one air conditioner unit. - AFR1. Had you already considered disposing of the air conditioner unit before you heard about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Ap...

AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document asks respondents about their behavior regarding disposing of an air conditioner unit, specifically in relation to the Appliance Retirement Program offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explores whether the program influenced their decision to retire the appliance and how likely they were to have paid for the service themselves.

Table 3: List of Discounts per Product STAR® Regular CFLs $3 on ENERGY Between $5–$7 on Power Bars with Integrated Timers (multipacks of 2 or more) ($7 in the spring and $5 in the fall) $4 on ENERGY STAR® Specialty CFLs (single or double p...

AI summary Table 3 outlines discounts for various energy-efficient products in 2012, including CFLs, LED lamps, and programmable thermostats. Many products had similar discounts as in 2011, but some additions and increases were made, such as higher discounts on LED lamps and the inclusion of load sensing power bars.

Ref.: 5790 1 1 LED recessed downlight fixtures were promoted and discounted only during the fall campaign. In 2012, the program was promoted through in-store signage, store flyers, radio remotes and advertisements, newspaper advertisements...

AI summary The Instant Savings program promoted LED recessed downlight fixtures and CFLs through various marketing strategies, including discounts, in-store promotions, and customer engagement events. The program aimed to increase adoption of energy-efficient lighting, with a focus on overcoming price barriers and achieving electricity and demand savings targets outlined in the 2012 Demand Side Management Plan.

Efficiency of the Instant Rebates Awarded at the Counter During the fall campaign, all retailers visited automatically awarded customers a rebate at the cash register when a qualifying product was purchased. Therefore, the rebate processin...

AI summary During the fall campaign, instant rebates were awarded at the counter when qualifying products were purchased, ensuring correct processing. This contrasts with the spring campaign, where in-store visits did not ensure proper rebate processing.

, eligible products and rebate amounts. This feedback from retailers confirmed what the DA had already noticed. Some retailers suggested communicating information progressively instead of all at once. Most retailers were satisfied with the...

AI summary Retailers provided feedback on the marketing and product selection of an energy efficiency program. They suggested improving communication strategies, increasing educational content, and enhancing customer engagement through events and mass media. Retailers also recommended expanding the list of eligible products and focusing more on LED products.

Replacement Ratio CFLs have been available on the market for a number of years now. At this point, it is likely that many CFLs purchased will be replacing other already installed CFLs. Such replacement has already been observed in many jur...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement ratio of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in energy efficiency programs. It notes that 20% of CFLs purchased may replace other CFLs, reducing program savings. The replacement ratio of 0.80, measured in a previous survey, was used again this year due to inconclusive results from an intercept survey. Econoler recommends re-evaluating the ratio periodically using a socket study.

Tracked Savings LED lamps are also rebated under Instant Savings and distributed during in-store customer engagement events. For the LED lamps sold during the spring and fall campaigns, ENSC uses an annual unitary savings value of 41.7 kWh...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings value for LED lamps distributed through the Instant Savings program. It uses data from 2011, comparing the wattage of LED lamps with standard lamps and estimating daily usage hours to arrive at a savings value of 41.7 kWh per year.

Unitary Savings The unitary savings value was revised according to the displaced wattage of 34.9 watts and the hours of operation estimated at 2.7 hours per day: $$Annual\ Unitary\ Savings = \frac{(34.9\ W) \times 2.7 \frac{h}{day} \times...

AI summary The unitary savings value was revised to 34.4 kWh per year based on displaced wattage and estimated hours of operation. This value is used for evaluating gross savings for LED lamps sold through various campaigns and in-store events.

Table 18: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Dimmer Switches Parameters Values Wattage 2 × 60W = 120W Dimmed Wattage 80% × 120W = 96W Operating Time 2.7 h/day Annual Savings 23.7 kWh The OPA assumes that the light output from light fixt...

AI summary The OPA calculates annual energy savings from dimmer switches at 23.7 kWh per year, assuming a 20% energy saving from a 25% reduction in light output. Econoler accepts this assumption as there is no contradictory evidence.

Revised Savings For this year's evaluation, Econoler reviewed the parameters used in the 2010 OPA report to validate if they are still appropriate. The following table presents these parameters.

AI summary Econoler evaluated the parameters from the 2010 OPA report to determine their continued appropriateness for this year's evaluation.

Table 20: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Dimmer Switches with Motion Sensor Parameters Values Fixture Wattage (2 × 60W) = 120W Dimmed Wattage 80% × 120W = 96W Old Operating Time 2.7 h/day New Operating Time – with Sensor 1.24 h/day...

AI summary Table 20 presents the OPA's unitary savings calculation for dimmer switches with motion sensors, showing an annual energy savings of 74.8 kWh. This value is used in the gross savings evaluation for all such devices sold through the program.

4.2.15 Demand-to-Energy Ratio Econoler calculated the demand savings for Instant Savings based on a demand-to-energy ratio of 0.176 MW/GWh. This ratio was obtained from the adjusted 2012 program targets, by dividing the target peak demand...

AI summary Econoler calculated the demand savings for the Instant Savings program using a demand-to-energy ratio of 0.176 MW/GWh, derived from adjusted 2012 program targets by dividing peak demand savings by energy savings.

Table 29: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings by Product – Lighting Products Category of Product Regular CFL Specialty CFL LED Lamp LED Recessed Downlight Fixture Dimmer Switch Indoor Motion Sensor Dimmer Switch with Motio...

AI summary Table 29 presents the evaluation results of gross energy and demand savings by lighting product category, including the number of units sold, replacement ratios, unitary savings values, and total energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels across various campaigns and product types.

Table 31: Interactive Effects Calculation for Lighting Products Parameters % of Residences Interactive Effects 24 Electric heating with air conditioning 33% × 18% = 5.9% -54.4% Electric heating without air conditioning 33% × 82% = 27.1% -5...

AI summary Table 31 calculates the interactive effects of lighting products based on heating and air conditioning usage, showing varying impacts across different residence categories. The weighted interactive effects factor is -18.5%, with adjustments made for outdoor use of CFLs and LED lamps.

age of 16 contained CFLs. Overall, this is good news for ENSC as a promoter of energy-efficient products. However, Econoler recommends that ENSC considers removing the rebate offered for regular CFLs. This free-ridership level is only appl...

AI summary The document discusses the rebate program for Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) promoted by Energy Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), noting that Econoler recommends removing the rebate for regular CFLs. Specialty CFLs are treated differently due to their low sales volume and unique characteristics, leading to a free-ridership level of 1.

4.4.2 Spillover Instant Savings discounts are offered during two distinct periods: in the spring and in the fall. During and between these two periods, eligible product sales may occur due to program influence, even if participants are not...

AI summary The document discusses the spillover effects of the Instant Savings program, analyzing how it influences sales of energy-efficient products beyond the discount periods. Retailers attributed 29% of CFL sales, 20% of LED sales, and 48% of clothes washer sales to program influence, indicating broader market effects.

Table 36: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 19.009 GWh 16.3...

AI summary Table 36 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC. It shows discrepancies between initial gross savings and net savings, with evaluation results indicating higher savings than tracked results. The NTGR values also differ between the two methods, highlighting variations in efficiency measurements.

CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of Instant Savings demonstrated that the program works well overall and constitutes the right approach in a market transformation and resource acquisition perspective. Additions were made to the program to he...

AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Instant Savings program found that it works well overall and was improved with increased discounts, more eligible products, and better marketing. ENSC implemented key recommendations from the 2011 evaluation, including new tools for program management. Retailers reported high satisfaction but noted challenges in involving store staff and expanding eligible product categories, especially for refrigerators. The program achieved energy savings of 10.767 GWh and demand savings of 1.895 MW in 2012.

SECTION L – ENERGY STAR LED BULBS L1. I now have a few questions about your sales of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs. By ENERGY STAR LED bulbs, we refer to ENERGY STAR LED screw-in bulbs and ENERGY STAR LED recessed downlights rebated through the pr...

AI summary The section asks about the sales volume of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs during the spring and fall 2012 campaigns and overall for 2012. It also inquires about expected sales trends and the percentage of sales attributed to the two campaigns.

Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 9.177 GWh 9.177 GWh 0.70 6.424 GWh Evaluation Resu...

AI summary Table 2 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC in 2012. Evaluated savings are higher than tracked savings by 12% and 11% respectively. The difference is attributed to a more accurate calculation of energy savings per EnerGuide point, based on a larger sample size and billing analysis, and the inclusion of certain prescriptive measures.

RECOMMENDATIONS Econoler finds that HEA is a good EE initiative that includes all the necessary ingredients to implement measures tailored specifically to the conditions of each house. The program includes good practices and reached a sati...

AI summary Econoler recommends strengthening communication between ENSC and Delivery Agents (DAs), providing technical support for HOT2000 software, and implementing a continuous HOT2000 simulation review process to improve the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program's effectiveness and quality.

1 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Home Energy Assessment (HEA) encourages homeowners in Nova Scotia to improve the energy efficiency (EE) and comfort of their home while reducing its environmental impact a...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program helps homeowners improve energy efficiency and reduce costs. The program replaced the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) in 2012 due to changes in eligible measures and the withdrawal of federal rebates. The federal EnerGuide program reached its participant limit and closed new enrollments in 2012, but existing participants can still use HEA for further upgrades.

3.2.3 Evaluation Plan ENSC has adopted the Evaluator's recommended template for an evaluation plan, which is included as an Appendix of the HEA program manual. The PM provided positive feedback on this important tool that complements the p...

AI summary ENSC has adopted an evaluation plan template for the HEA program, which was positively received. The Evaluator recommends simplifying the Base Case table by removing N/A entries and focusing on relevant calculations for net savings.

essible and to ensure that the information it contains is up to date. The necessary data for calculating the estimated gross savings are included in the tracking sheet: - > Initial and Final EnerGuide Ratings data come from the HOT2000 sim...

AI summary The tracking sheet includes data for calculating energy savings, such as EnerGuide ratings and heating system types. The 2011 evaluation report's savings per EnerGuide point is used for calculations. The Evaluator suggests future adjustments to improve consistency and facilitate program evaluation.

3.5 HOT2000 SIMULATION REVIEW The first point noticed during the HOT2000 simulation review was the high variability in professionalism and training found between EAs. Some of these organizations presented very accurate files which displaye...

AI summary The HOT2000 simulation review identified significant variability in the quality of work performed by EAs, with some producing accurate reports while others had recurrent errors. Econoler recommends ENSC implement a continuous review process to improve data collection and simulation accuracy, including feedback and training for EAs.

3.6.4 Opinion on Marketing Strategy Concerning the marketing and outreach activities, the majority of the program partners stated that even though it took a long time before the marketing strategy was put in place, they were happy with the...

AI summary Program partners expressed satisfaction with the marketing strategy, suggesting continued aggressive outreach through media and merchant promotions. They recommended focusing on renovators and contractors, increasing incentives, and offering more education through workshops to boost participation and support the growth of the energy efficiency industry.

Respondents were asked to rate the importance of the program elements that might have influenced their decision to implement energy-efficient measures through the program. Program incentives (mean of 8.6 on a 10 point scale), information a...

AI summary Respondents rated the importance of various program elements influencing their decision to implement energy-efficient measures. Program incentives, information from energy advisors, and the EnerGuide label were highly valued, while previous experience with the program was considered less important.

3.7.7 Recommendations for Improvements In terms of recommendations for improvements, almost one half of participants were unable to offer any suggestions (49%), indicating that, in general, there are few issues with this program. That said...

AI summary The majority of participants in the program did not provide recommendations for improvement, with only a small percentage suggesting enhancements such as more information, increased rebates, extended timelines, more eligible products, and better advertising.

4.2 GROSS SAVINGS The final tracking sheet provided by ENSC for 2012 contained a total of 1,839 participants. These participants were bundled with 811 participants from LIHS to calculate the energy savings per EnerGuide point value to be u...

AI summary The section discusses the calculation of gross savings using data from ENSC and LIHS participants, focusing on energy savings per EnerGuide point and prescriptive measures. The methodology for evaluating these elements is outlined in subsequent sections.

Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR) For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for each installed system. This value is calculated using the online calculator from the Center for Energy Advancement through Technol...

AI summary ENSC calculates a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for installed Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR) systems, based on average shower usage and water temperatures. Econoler supports this value as appropriate for estimating energy savings from DWHR installations.

Electric Hot Water Heater Tank Wraps For this product, ENSC does not consider unitary savings, since the EnerGuide point savings value calculated for the 2011 EEH program evaluation took hot water heater tank wraps into account. As explain...

AI summary ENSC does not consider unitary savings for electric hot water heater tank wraps, as the EnerGuide point savings value from the 2011 EEH program evaluation included these wraps. The 2012 evaluation excluded domestic hot water measures, using a unitary savings value of 270 kWh/year based on conductance values from the OPA report, which Econoler deems appropriate.

4.2.3 Demand Savings The demand savings of HEA are calculated using two different considerations. Firstly, Econoler calculated the demand savings for the program using a demand-to-energy ratio of 0.308 MW/GWh. This ratio was obtained from...

AI summary The demand savings for the Heat Energy Assistance (HEA) program are calculated using a demand-to-energy ratio of 0.308 MW/GWh, confirmed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). Additionally, demand savings from electric thermal storage (ETS) units under the Energy Efficiency Home Retrofit Program (EEH) are estimated, with specific values for ETS forced air furnaces and ETS room units. These values were derived from HOT2000 simulations and a diversity factor of 80%.

Table 27: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings Initial Gross with Interactive Savings Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 9.177 GWh 9.177 GWh 0.70 6.424 GWh Evaluation Res...

AI summary Table 27 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC programs in 2012. Evaluated savings are 12% and 11% higher than tracked savings for energy and demand, respectively. The discrepancy is due to a recalibration of energy savings per EnerGuide point based on a larger sample size and more precise billing analysis.

This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary 1. Strengthen the relationship with the DAs: Th...

AI summary The appendix highlights the need for improved communication between ENSC and the DAs, including notifying them of program modifications and consulting them on potential measures. The Evaluator supports open communication and cooperation, noting that ENSC's 2013 Trade Allies Internet portal is a positive step in this direction.

Tracking Sheet - 10. Add the percentage of electric heating: In 2011, the electricity savings were calculated by the Evaluator based on the percentage of space heating load delivered by electricity. This information was available from the...

AI summary The tracking sheet outlines procedures for calculating and validating energy savings. It addresses the percentage of electric heating, validation processes for data entry, and the distinction between gross and net savings. The ENSC is responsible for implementing these procedures.

PROGRAM COMPONENT OVERVIEW Fuel Substitution began in April 2011 and ran as a pilot until the end of that year. January 2012 saw the completion of the pilot phase and the launch of Fuel Substitution by ENSC. Fuel Substitution encourages ho...

AI summary Fuel Substitution, initiated in 2011 by ENSC, encourages homeowners to reduce electricity use for heating and domestic hot water by replacing electric systems with alternative sources. Eligible incentives include wood and pellet stoves, natural gas systems, and heat pumps. The program aimed for 2.7 GWh electricity savings and 1.2 MW demand savings in 2012.

3.4.6 Participant Recommendations for Improvements Respondents were asked if they had any recommendations for improving the program. Just over one in 10 would like to see the rebate amount increased (13%), while approximately one in 10 wou...

AI summary Respondents were asked for recommendations to improve the program. 13% suggested increasing rebate amounts, 9% wanted better communication, 8% desired improved advertising, and 7% suggested simplifying application processes. 52% of respondents did not provide recommendations for improvement.

Geothermal and Ducted Central Air Source Heat Pumps Econoler reviewed the unitary savings values used for geothermal and ducted central air source heat pumps based on studies and evaluation reports. For geothermal heat pumps, Econoler revi...

AI summary Econoler reviewed the unitary savings values for geothermal and ducted central air source heat pumps, revising the geothermal value based on Hydro-Québec's evaluation and estimating demand savings using a central natural gas heating system. For ducted air source heat pumps, Econoler used data from the OPA report and estimated annual unitary savings at 7,076 kWh.

Gas Area Heater To estimate the unitary savings value for gas area heaters, ENSC took the unitary savings value established for wood stoves and calculated a unitary savings value based on the proportion of the capacity installed for each t...

AI summary ENSC estimated the unitary savings value for gas area heaters by using the proportion of capacity installed compared to wood stoves. Econoler validated this approach but adjusted the value based on wood stove savings and market capacity assumptions, resulting in a unitary savings value of 2,539 kWh/year and demand savings of 1.45 kW.

4.2.4 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of equipment installed through Fuel Substitution are presented in [Table 25.](#page-44-0) They were calculated using the unitary savings values reviewed in this report....

AI summary This section presents revised gross savings from Fuel Substitution programs, calculated using unitary savings values. Total energy and demand savings at the meter are 2.041 GWh and 1.130 MW, respectively. At the generator level, considering a line loss factor of 1.100, savings are estimated at 2.245 GWh and 1.243 MW.

4.3.2 Spillover For Fuel Substitution, internal spillover can occur when participants who installed a natural gas space or DHW heating system and, following or during their participation, were influenced by the program to also replace othe...

AI summary The text discusses internal spillover in a fuel substitution program, where participants influenced by the program purchased additional natural gas appliances beyond those eligible for rebates. One of six surveyed participants indicated such behavior, leading to energy savings of 20.41 MWh, representing 1% of total program savings.

[IF FR2c > 5, THEN ASK] FR2cc. DO NOT ASK FR2cc IF DON'T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your response to a previous question that if the Fuel Substitution Program had not been available there was an [FR2c] in 10 likelihood that...

AI summary The document presents a series of questions related to the likelihood of replacing heating or domestic hot water systems without a rebate and the time delay associated with such a decision. It also asks about the importance of factors influencing the decision. The questions are part of a survey or regulatory proceeding.

ACRONYMS ARep Appliance Replacement ARet Appliance Retirement CFL Compact Fluorescent Lamp DA Delivery Agent DCS Department of Community Services EA Energy Advisor EEH EnerGuide for Existing Houses ENSC Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation H...

AI summary The text provides a list of acronyms and their corresponding full forms, including terms related to energy efficiency, appliance programs, and government departments. It includes references to organizations, programs, and regulatory bodies involved in energy and utility management.

DEFINITIONS Base case A base case details the information on how assumed gross savings used in the tracking sheet have been established. Usually, these savings are calculated with a series of variables such as hours of operation, wattage o...

AI summary The document defines key terms related to energy efficiency programs, including base case, demand savings, distortion effects, and net-to-gross ratio. It outlines how energy savings are calculated, evaluated, and tracked, considering factors like interactive effects and distortion effects.

4.2 GROSS SAVINGS The tracking sheets provided by ENSC for 2012 contained a total of 811 participants. These participants were bundled with 1,839 participants from HEA to estimate an incremental energy savings per EnerGuide point (hereafte...

AI summary ENSC provided tracking sheets with 811 participants for 2012, which were combined with 1,839 HEA participants to estimate energy savings per EnerGuide point. Econoler adjusted prescriptive measure savings based on ENSC program findings and used parameters like incremental energy savings and demand-to-energy ratio to evaluate LIHS gross savings.

Electric Kettles For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 49 kWh per year, based on the Navigant study, for which the calculation details were not available. This value had also been used in previous evaluations of LIHS. As w...

AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 49 kWh per year for electric kettles, based on a Navigant study, which has been used in previous LIHS evaluations. Econoler did not find new data on energy savings for electric kettles and recommends maintaining the same value for this year's evaluation.

Power Bars with Integrated Timer ENSC promoted the installation of power bars with integrated timer through LIHS for the first part of 2012. This product helps reduce the standby power of the electronic devices plugged into it. Based on th...

AI summary ENSC promoted the installation of power bars with integrated timers through the LIHS program in 2012. These devices reduce standby power consumption, and ENSC used a unitary savings value of 53 kWh per year per installed unit, based on the OPA 2011 report.

Dehumidifiers LIHS promoted the replacement of old dehumidifiers with more efficient models. In some instances, ENSC also installed dehumidifiers in households where there was no dehumidifier in place before the project. With regard to the...

AI summary The document discusses how ENSC promoted the replacement of old dehumidifiers with more efficient models and installed new dehumidifiers in some households. It outlines the energy savings assumptions used, including a unitary savings value of 686 kWh per year and 500 kWh based on different evaluations and reports.

Refrigerator Replacements In 2012, ENSC promoted the replacement of old refrigerators with more efficient models through LIHS. For this appliance replacement measure, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 817 kWh per year. This figure is ba...

AI summary In 2012, ENSC promoted replacing old refrigerators with more efficient models through the LIHS program. The unitary savings value of 817 kWh per year was calculated by subtracting the annual consumption of old refrigerators (1,104 kWh) from new ENERGY STAR® models (287 kWh). Econoler revised this value using data from the NRCan EnerGuide Appliance Directory and ARet, focusing on refrigerators older than 1990.

Faucet Aerators For all faucet aerators installed through the program, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 176.3 kWh per year. This value comes from the 2011 OPA Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report. The OPA reports a base flow ra...

AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 176.3 kWh per year for faucet aerators, derived from the 2011 OPA report. The value assumes a 31.8% reduction in water flow and an average hot water usage of 8.81 liters per day per household. Econoler validated this approach, finding limited alternative data.

4.2.4 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for LIHS are presented in the table below. Energy and demand savings for the program were revised to reflect the calibrated savings per EnerGuide rating point and the savings from prescr...

AI summary The annual gross savings for the Low-Income Home Upgrade (LIHS) program are revised to reflect calibrated savings based on EnerGuide ratings and prescriptive measures. Total gross energy and demand savings amount to 2.070 GWh and 0.981 MW at the meter, with higher estimates of 2.277 GWh and 1.079 MW at the generator level, using a line loss factor provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC).

Product Category Fridge Replacement Freezer Replacement Fridge Retirement Freezer Retirement Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Showerhead Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Wrap Total Energy Savings Total Number of Units 132 157 1 1 204 139 202 167 7,55...

AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings across various product categories, including fridge and freezer replacements, retirement, faucet aerators, low-flow showerheads, pipe insulation, and hot water tank wraps. It includes metrics such as total number of units, unitary savings, gross energy savings at the meter and generator, line loss factors, demand savings, and demand-to-energy ratios.

4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as space heating and cooling equipment. In the case of L...

AI summary The text discusses interactive effects in energy efficiency measures, focusing on how replacing lighting with CFLs in LIHS impacts heating and cooling loads. The analysis uses a 1992 study by ADS and simulations with DOE-2 software, assuming 38% of LIHS participants use electric heating and no air conditioning. Interactive effects are calculated based on electric heating efficiency and non-electric heating systems.

Table 10: Evaluation Results – Gross and Net Savings Product Category Savings per EnerGuide Point 13-Watt CFL 23-Watt CFL Specialty CFL Flush Mount CFL CFL Porch Light Programmable Thermostat Electric Kettle Power Bar with Timer Dehumidifi...

AI summary Table 10 presents evaluation results for energy and demand savings across various product categories, including CFLs, thermostats, and dehumidifiers. The table includes gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factors, and line loss factors for each category.

2012 Evaluation Report # ECONOLE R Product Category Fridge Replacement Freezer Replacement Fridge Retirement Freezer Retirement Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Showerhead Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Wrap Total Energy Savings Total Gross Energy...

AI summary The 2012 Evaluation Report presents energy savings data for various home upgrade programs, including fridge and freezer replacement, faucet aerators, and hot water tank wraps. The report details gross and net energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, factoring in interactive effects and line loss.

RELEVANCE AND ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTED BY THE ADVISOR The advisor made a complete list of all of the relevant retrofits that were performed /5 The advisor collected all of the relevant invoices and pictures to clearly identify...

AI summary The document evaluates the advisor's performance in collecting accurate information about home retrofits and communicating findings to the client. It highlights the advisor's thoroughness in documenting renovations, verifying data, conducting tests, and ensuring client understanding.

Table 1: Rebates Provided by ENSC per EnerGuide Rating EnerGuide Rating Total Rebate 83 or 84 $3,000 85, 86 or 87 $5,000 88 or higher $7,000 In 2012, the program aimed to achieve net electricity savings of 2.2 GWh and demand savings of 0.6...

AI summary Table 1 outlines rebates provided by ENSC based on EnerGuide ratings, with higher ratings receiving larger rebates. In 2012, the program aimed to achieve net electricity savings of 2.2 GWh and demand savings of 0.6 MW.

Table 3: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 5.775 GWh 5.689 GWh 0.73 4.153 GWh Evaluation Resu...

AI summary Table 3 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings at the generator level. Tracked savings from ENSC are compared to evaluation results, showing differences in gross savings, interactive effects, and net savings.

4.2.2 Prescriptive Measure Savings In addition to the savings per EnerGuide point coefficient, ENSC calculated incremental savings for a set of prescriptive measures that are not taken into account in HOT2000 simulations. The savings value...

AI summary ENSC calculated incremental savings for prescriptive measures not included in HOT2000 simulations, including Drain Water Heat Recovery and electric DHW heater pipe insulation. These savings were considered under specific conditions, and a new prescriptive measure, solar DHW systems, was added for 2012.

Drain Water Heat Recovery For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for each installed system. This value is calculated using the online calculator from the Center for Energy Advancement through Technology Inn...

AI summary ENSC calculates a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for each installed drain water heat recovery system, based on average household shower usage and water temperature data. Econoler agrees that this value is appropriate for estimating energy savings from such systems.

Solar DHW Systems Connected to Electric Water Heater Tank ENSC does not use a unitary savings for this product since it is covered by the HOT2000 simulations and included in the EnerGuide point savings. As explained before, the new approac...

AI summary ENSC uses HOT2000 simulations to calculate EnerGuide point savings for solar DHW systems connected to electric water heater tanks. Econoler calculated an average unitary savings value of 2,234 kWh for this measure, which will be used to calculate the gross savings for 2012.

4.2.3 Demand Savings Calculation The demand savings of Performance Plus are calculated using two different considerations. Firstly, Econoler calculated the demand savings using a demand-to-energy ratio of 0.273 MW/GWh. This ratio was obtai...

AI summary The demand savings for the Performance Plus program are calculated using a demand-to-energy ratio of 0.273 MW/GWh confirmed by ENSC. Additionally, Econoler added estimated demand savings from ETS units installed in residential buildings, including forced air furnaces, central hydronic systems, and room units, with specified savings values per project and unit.

4.5 NET SAVINGS The net savings for the program were estimated using the interactive effects factors and the NTGR above. The equation below was used to calculate the net savings. Net savings = Gross Evaluation Savings × (1 + Interactive Ef...

AI summary The net savings for the program were calculated using the interactive effects factors and the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR). The equation used is Net savings = Gross Evaluation Savings × (1 + Interactive Effects Factor) × NTGR. The results show total net energy and demand savings of 4.493 GWh and 1.344 MW at the meter, and 4.942 GWh and 1.478 MW at the generator.

Table 38: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings Product Category Savings per EnerGuide Point DWHR Pipe Insulation Program mable Thermo stats 13-Watt CFLs Solar DHW ETS Forced Air Furnaces ETS Central Hydronic Systems ETS Room...

AI summary Table 38 presents the evaluation results of net energy and demand savings across various product categories, including Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR), Pipe Insulation, and Energy Storage Systems (ETS). The table includes gross and net energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, factoring in Interactive Effects, Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR), and Line Loss Factor.

Table 39: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 5.775 GWh 5.689 GWh 0.73 4.153 GWh Evaluation Res...

AI summary Table 39 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC in 2012. Evaluated savings are higher than tracked savings by 19% and 18%, respectively, due to an adjustment in energy savings per EnerGuide point and a larger sample size used in the evaluation.

Recommendations for Program Improvements (R Series) - R1. Do you have any recommendations for improving the Performance Plus program? PROBE: Anything else? - 1. (Offer more measures eligible for rebates) [GO TO R3] - 2. (Offer more informa...

AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving the Performance Plus program, including expanding eligible measures, improving information and marketing, streamlining processes, and enhancing auditor support. Respondents are asked to specify additional energy efficiency upgrades they would like covered by the program.

4.2.12 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of product installed through the program are presented in [Table 30.](#page-94-0) They were calculated using the revised unitary savings values presented in the previo...

AI summary The document presents revised gross energy and demand savings from program installations, totaling 42.207 GWh and 9.623 MW at the meter. Generator-level savings are estimated at 46.427 GWh and 10.585 MW, using a line loss factor of 1.100 provided by Nova Scotia Power.

Table 33: Interactive Effects Factors for CFLs, LED Lamps and LED Nightlights Category of Product % Indoor % Outdoor Interactive Effects Factor CFL 94% 6% (94% × -17.9%) + (6% × 0%) = -16.8% LED Lamp 100% 0% -17.9% LED Nightlight 100% 0% -...

AI summary Table 33 outlines interactive effects factors for CFLs, LED lamps, and LED nightlights, showing how indoor and outdoor usage percentages influence energy savings. During heating periods, insulation and hot water tank wraps have a -100% interactive effect, while during cooling periods, they have a +100% effect. Econoler calculated a weighted interactive effects factor of -18.3% for lighting products in Nova Scotia, based on heating and cooling degree-days.

MURB-R2. Continue offering information about products installed and energy efficiency: There is a need for an energy efficiency program in the multi-unit renter market, as multi-unit renters are often less interested in energy efficiency a...

AI summary The document highlights the need for energy efficiency programs targeting multi-unit renters, who are less likely to install energy-efficient products. It also recommends improving data collection methods, such as tracking products by unit number instead of tenant names, and enhancing the tracking sheet to better evaluate savings and facilitate field activities.

Common Areas Rental Units - > CFLs; > CFLs; - > LED exit signs; and > faucet aerators; - > hot water tank wraps. > low-flow showerheads; - > LED lamps; > LED nightlights; - > pipe insulation; and - > hot water tank wraps. In 2011, under th...

AI summary The Common Areas Rental Units program includes energy efficiency upgrades like LED lighting, faucet aerators, and hot water tank wraps. Funding for electricity-related upgrades comes from rate-payers, while other fuel-related upgrades are funded by the Province of Nova Scotia. Savings from these upgrades are tracked under the Commercial Direct Install targets and the Existing Houses program.

4.2.9 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of product installed through the program are presented in [Table 27.](#page-183-0) They were calculated using the revised unitary savings values presented in the previo...

AI summary The annual gross savings for each category of product installed through the program are calculated using revised unitary savings values. Total gross energy and demand savings amount to 2.863 GWh and 0.661 MW at the meter. At the generator level, using a line loss factor of 1.093, the savings are estimated at 3.130 GWh and 0.723 MW for MURB, which targets multi-unit buildings with a mix of commercial and residential customers.

Program Manual 5. Document the major characteristics of the program: MURB has provincial funding this year. Thus, the installation of products that aim at reducing hot water consumption when a non-electric energy source is used for DHW is...

AI summary The program manual discusses the inclusion of provincial funding for MURB, which covers the installation of products aimed at reducing hot water consumption when non-electric energy sources are used for DHW. The Evaluator suggests adding this information to the manual.

Tracking Sheet 13. Set limitations for entries and develop a validation process: To ensure the validity of the values entered in the tracking sheet, Econoler recommends that ENSC establish a validation process to collect information in a s...

AI summary Econoler recommends that ENSC establish a validation process for the tracking sheet to ensure data consistency, including setting a limit on insulation installation to the first 15 feet per unit and standardizing entries with '0' for no installations.

PROGRAM COMPONENT OVERVIEW Solar provides rebates to encourage the adoption of solar thermal (water and air heating) installations in homes and businesses across Nova Scotia. Solar heating systems convert the sun's energy into thermal ener...

AI summary The Solar program in Nova Scotia provides rebates for solar thermal installations in homes and businesses. The program has operated under Conserve Nova Scotia and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). Additional rebates were available under EnerGuide for Houses and Performance Plus programs. In 2012, residential participants could choose between a rebate or zero-interest financing for solar water heating, but not for air systems or commercial systems. Expected net energy savings for 2012 were 0.099 GWh.

Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.120 GWh 0.70 0.084 GWh Evaluation Results 0.120 GWh 1.00 0.120 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0 GWh 0.70 0 GWh Evaluation Results 0 GWh 1.00 0 GWh Tabl...

AI summary The table compares tracked and evaluated savings for energy and demand from the ENSC program. Energy savings show a net saving of 0.084 GWh, while demand savings remain at 0 GWh. The NTGR values indicate the proportion of gross savings that are net savings.

4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation aims to determine the gross and net electric savings of the program for 2012. Energy and demand savings were considered in this evaluation. To do so, Econoler analyz...

AI summary The impact evaluation assesses the gross and net electric savings of the program in 2012 by analyzing unitary energy savings values from equipment installations. Econoler reviewed ENSC's parameters, conducted on-site visits, and validated data from RETScreen analysis for commercial participants.

Energy Savings for Residential Installations Econoler evaluated the unitary savings values used for DHW in residential homes by performing RETScreen simulations using the same input data as in NRCan's tests. These simulations were complete...

AI summary Econoler evaluated unitary savings values for residential solar systems, finding that values from NRCan's directory are acceptable. For space heating, simulations showed 6.5% savings for dedicated systems. Combo systems with more collectors than NRCan models received additional space heating savings, while those with exact numbers had savings attributed only to DHW.

Table 6: Comparisons of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.120 GWh 0.70 0.084 GWh Evaluation Results 0.120 GWh 1.00 0.120 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savi...

AI summary Table 6 compares energy and demand savings tracked by ENSC with evaluation results for 2012. Evaluated energy savings were 43% higher than tracked savings, attributed to an NTGR of 0.7 assumed by ENSC. A minor adjustment for space heating had minimal impact.

2.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The purpose of the impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net savings of the LHLE in 2012. To this end, Econoler reviewed ENSC unitary savings calculations by comparing them with...

AI summary The impact evaluation aims to assess the gross and net energy and demand savings from the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) in 2012. Econoler reviewed ENSC's unitary savings calculations, compared them with other jurisdictions, and used a diversity factor and interactive effects to calculate gross and net savings.

Table 7: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked savings from ENSC 0.374 GWh 0.374 GWh 1.00 0.374 GWh Evaluation resu...

AI summary Table 7 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC's DSM programs. Evaluated savings were lower than tracked savings, with energy savings decreasing from 0.374 GWh to 0.349 GWh and demand savings dropping from 1.871 MW to 0.753 MW. Econoler adjusted the daily usage assumption, increasing the unitary savings value from 35.2 kWh to 40.8 kWh, though peak demand savings remained unchanged at 176 W.

Satisfaction and Motivations Satisfaction with the program has been strong among mail-in rebate participants and distributors. Actually, most of them expressed their satisfaction with the program overall and its various aspects. Considerin...

AI summary The document highlights high satisfaction among mail-in rebate participants and distributors with the program, citing an easy application process and the introduction of ENSC's new energy sheet to inform participants about expected savings. This initiative aims to enhance satisfaction and participation by addressing the motivation of energy savings and cost reduction.

Impact on the Market With regard to the instant rebate approach, many distributors noticed, on one hand, that program advertising activities had a good impact on their sales of LED lighting systems. On the other hand, according to some dis...

AI summary The instant rebate approach under the BER program had a weaker impact on the sales of T8 lamps and ballasts compared to other BNI programs, which offered higher incentives. Many distributors noted that other programs, such as Business Energy Solutions (BES) and Custom Retrofit, were more effective in driving sales, even though energy savings were counted only once.

Program Energy Savings To calculate the net savings of the BER mail-in rebate approach in 2012, Econoler reviewed the ENSC-estimated gross savings by analysing the results of 50 on-site visits and measuring the distortion effects associate...

AI summary Econoler calculated the net savings of the BER mail-in rebate approach in 2012 by analyzing 50 on-site visits and determining a free-ridership level of 18 percent, resulting in a net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) of 0.82. Free-ridership levels were also estimated for other products under the instant rebate approach based on distributor interviews.

1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Business Energy Rebates (BER) provides financial incentives in the form of prescriptive rebates to business, non-profit and institutional (BNI) clients to encourage the reduction of electrical energy consumption and d...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides prescriptive rebates to BNI clients in Nova Scotia to reduce energy consumption. Launched in 2010, it includes categories like HVAC and lighting, with eligible measures based on industry standards. In 2012, the program expanded to include commercial kitchen and agricultural equipment, aiming for 14.9 GWh electricity savings.

Table 3: Sample Size and Sampling Error Mail-in Rebate Survey Mail-in Rebate Population Sample Size (n) Sampling Error at 90% Confidence Interval 2011 Participants 106 2 43 ±9.7% 2012 Participants 175 3 56 ±9.9% Ref.: 5790 5

AI summary Table 3 presents sample sizes and sampling errors for mail-in rebate surveys conducted in 2011 and 2012. The 2011 survey had a population of 106 participants with a sample size of 43 and a sampling error of ±9.7%, while the 2012 survey had a population of 175 participants with a sample size of 56 and a sampling error of ±9.9%.

3.2.1 Program Manual A program manual is an important tool for the entire program staff, as well as for the Evaluator. Indeed, it serves as a program memory and can be particularly useful in case of staff changes. The program manual is int...

AI summary The document discusses the evolution of the Program Manual for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). It highlights the adoption of a standardized template with 10 sections, improving upon the 2011 format and incorporating recommendations from the Evaluator.

3.2.3 Evaluation Plan ENSC has adopted the Evaluator's recommended template for an evaluation plan, which is included as an Appendix of the BER program manual. The PM provided positive feedback on this important tool that complements the p...

AI summary ENSC has adopted an evaluation plan template recommended by an evaluator, which is included in the BER program manual. The PM praised this tool as a significant enhancement to the program documentation, improving program evaluation capabilities compared to previous years.

Mail-In Rebate As part of the 2012 BER evaluation, Econoler reviewed the content of the tracking sheet for the mail-in rebate approach. This tracking sheet is an extract from the online Demand-Side Management Data System (DSMDS). The Evalu...

AI summary The 2012 BER evaluation by Econoler identified limitations in the mail-in rebate tracking sheet, which was an extract from the DSMDS. The tracking sheet lacked essential information for evaluation due to system constraints, leading to unapplied recommendations. ENSC is addressing this by adapting the DSMDS to include all necessary data in one report.

Instant Rebate Econoler also reviewed the content of ENSC's tracking sheet for the instant rebate approach of BER. This tracking sheet contains a summary of the monthly savings achieved for each distributor. Econoler also reviewed the mont...

AI summary Econoler reviewed ENSC's tracking sheet for the instant rebate approach of BER, noting that monthly reporting sheets track product sales and energy/demand savings. The reporting sheets use a standardized template, but data entry methods could be improved to better facilitate calculations for each distributor.

Table 5: Distributors' Satisfaction with Program Aspect of Program Mean (/10) Sample Size 10 Mean (1="Not at all Satisfied", 10="Very Satisfied") Program overall 8.3 Program support and communications 8.9 Rebate processing, tracking and re...

AI summary Table 5 presents distributors' satisfaction with a program, showing high scores for program support and communications but lower scores for rebate processing. Distributors noted that advertising improved sales, especially for LED lighting, but some felt that other BNI programs competed with their BER business by offering similar products and services.

Table 8: Motivations for Participating 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Motivations for Participating Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 43 43 56 56 Save on en...

AI summary Table 8 presents data on participants' motivations for joining energy programs in 2011 and 2012. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs and bills, followed by taking advantage of program incentives and rebates. Other motivations included improving lighting conditions, reducing maintenance costs, and environmental concerns.

Sampling Methodology A total of 50 on-site visits were conducted for the impact evaluation of the mail-in rebate approach. The sampling was established in September 2012 from the tracking sheet of participants who went through this type of...

AI summary A sampling methodology involving 50 on-site visits was used to evaluate the impact of a mail-in rebate approach. The sample was selected in September 2012 from a tracking sheet containing 171 projects by 159 participants across various measure categories.

4.2.1 HVAC Measures A total of 22 visits were conducted at the sites where HVAC measures, mainly air and ground source heat pumps, were implemented. The on-site visits conducted for this category of measures allowed validating the number o...

AI summary This section discusses 22 on-site visits to validate HVAC measures, such as heat pumps, and highlights discrepancies in energy savings calculations due to incorrect data in participant worksheets. Corrections were necessary to ensure accurate tracking of savings.

4.2.2 Lighting Measures A total of 15 on-site visits were conducted to validate the parameters used in the savings calculations. One of those 15 projects had to be removed from the sample because the project had not been completed for spec...

AI summary A total of 15 on-site visits were conducted to validate energy savings calculations for lighting measures. One project was excluded due to external factors, and adjustments were made to savings calculations based on wattage, hours of operation, and installed units. Some participants overestimated or underestimated wattage values, affecting the accuracy of savings estimates.

4.2.4 Motors and Drives Measures Seven on-site visits were conducted for motors and drives measures. These visits allowed validating the technical data used by ENSC in the energy and demand savings calculations, namely the efficiency of th...

AI summary Seven on-site visits were conducted to validate technical data for Motors and Drives measures, leading to adjustments in energy and demand savings calculations. Adjustments were made to motor efficiency data and annual operation hours. For drives, energy and demand savings were calculated using specific factors or VSD impact analysis. Overall, energy savings increased by 3.34%, while demand savings decreased by 2.87%.

4.2.5 Compressed Air Measures For compressed air measures, only one on-site visit was conducted. This visit revealed that the operation hours reported by the participant were much longer than those validated on site, with the information r...

AI summary An on-site visit for compressed air measures revealed discrepancies in reported operation hours, leading to a 32.1% reduction in energy savings for the project. Due to a small sample size, the reduction was limited to the sampled project, affecting 9.83% of overall energy savings.

4.2.6 Agricultural Measures One on-site visit was conducted in a facility where agricultural measures were implemented. This visit revealed that the energy savings had been underestimated as the default value used by ENSC for the operation...

AI summary An on-site visit revealed that energy savings from agricultural measures were underestimated due to incorrect operation hours used by ENSC. The savings were adjusted upward by 4,204 kWh (33.8%) with no change in demand savings. This adjustment is equivalent to a factor of 1.037.

Table 21: Diversity Factors for Mail-In Rebate Category of Measure 2012 Diversity Factor HVAC 100% Lighting 97% Refrigeration 100% Motors and Drives 93% Compressed Air 65% Agricultural Equipment 85% Commercial Kitchen Equipment 97% Corresp...

AI summary Table 21 presents diversity factors for various categories of measures under the Mail-In Rebate program, with percentages ranging from 65% for Compressed Air to 100% for HVAC and Refrigeration. The table also notes that the 97% diversity factor for Commercial Kitchen Equipment corresponds to a weighted average calculated for each project visited.

Energy and demand savings for the program were revised to include the adjustments presented in the sections above. Using the diversity factors calculated for each category, the peak demand was established. Savings at the generator level we...

AI summary The document revises energy and demand savings for the BER program, using diversity factors and line loss factors to calculate peak demand and savings at both the meter and generator levels. Total gross energy and demand savings are estimated at specific figures.

4.5 NET SAVINGS The net savings for the mail-in rebate approach were estimated using the NTGR. Since interactive effects were already included in the gross savings calculations of the lighting projects, no other factor had to be applied. T...

AI summary The net savings for the mail-in rebate approach were calculated using the Non-Technical Generation Ratios (NTGR). The equation used was Net Savings = Revised Gross Savings × NTGR, applied to both energy and demand savings. In 2012, total net energy and demand savings were 7.230 GWh and 2.390 MW at the meter, and 7.779 GWh and 2.572 MW at the generator.

Table 23: Evaluation Results – Revised Net Savings – Mail-In Rebate Category of Measure HVAC Lighting Refrigeration Motors and Drives Compressed Air Agricultural Kitchen Laundry Total Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at Meter (G...

AI summary Table 23 presents evaluation results for revised net savings from a mail-in rebate program, detailing energy and demand savings across various categories such as HVAC, lighting, and refrigeration. It includes metrics like gross and net energy savings, non-technical generation ratios (NTGR), and line loss factors.

The table below presents comparisons between the energy and demand savings established by this evaluation for the mail-in rebate approach and those calculated in the 2012 tracking sheet. Table 24: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Saving...

AI summary The table compares energy and demand savings from the mail-in rebate approach evaluated in this document with those tracked in the 2012 tracking sheet. The evaluation results show energy savings fell short by 7% and demand savings by 3% compared to ENSC's tracked savings.

5.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation for instant rebate is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of this component of BER for 2012. Both energy and demand savings were considered in this evalua...

AI summary The impact evaluation for the instant rebate component of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012 aimed to determine gross and net savings, considering energy and demand savings. Econoler analyzed parameters such as savings calculation methodology, diversity factor, interactive effects, and free-ridership. Monthly reporting sheets and distributor interviews were used to calculate net savings, including the Non-Technical Generation Ratios (NTGR).

5.2 GROSS SAVINGS Gross savings for the instant rebate approach were reviewed by the Evaluator based on the total number of products sold and their associated savings. The different categories of products eligible for an instant rebate wer...

AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating gross savings for the instant rebate approach, including product categories, unitary savings values, and adjustments to avoid double counting with other programs. It highlights the distribution of T8 lamps and HP ballasts and the exclusion of higher-value rebates from other programs.

Table 26: Displaced Wattages for Each Type of Ballast Used in the Tracking Sheet New Ballast and Lamp Systems Baseline Wattage New Wattage Lamp ΔW Ballast ΔW Proportion of T8 Lamps Average Ballast ΔW 1-lamp ballast with HP-T8-32 W lamp 43....

AI summary Table 26 presents displaced wattages for various ballast and lamp systems used in the tracking sheet. It includes baseline wattage, new wattage, and changes in wattage for lamps and ballasts, along with the proportion of T8 lamps sold through the SLC program in 2011.

5.2.9 Diversity Factor The diversity factors obtained for the different measure categories of the mail-in rebate approach were also used for instant rebates. No on-site visit was conducted this year for the instant rebate approach. Therefo...

AI summary The diversity factors from the mail-in rebate approach were applied to the instant rebate approach due to the similarity in product usage and the lack of on-site visits for the instant rebate method. This decision was made by the Evaluator based on the 50 on-site visits conducted for the mail-in approach.

Energy and demand savings for the instant rebate approach were calculated using the unitary savings values revised under this evaluation. Savings at the generator level were also calculated using a line loss factor of 1.076 between the met...

AI summary The text discusses energy and demand savings calculations for an instant rebate approach, using unitary savings values and a line loss factor of 1.076. It provides figures for gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, citing Table 34 for detailed results.

Table 35: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings for All Other Products – Instant Rebate Product Category T5 and T8 High Bay LED Lighting Systems LED Wall Pack and Garage LED Ref. Strip Lighting Other LEDs Induction High Bay...

AI summary Table 35 presents the evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings across various product categories under the Instant Rebate program. It includes metrics such as tracked energy and demand savings, adjustment ratios, line loss factors, and diversity factors for different lighting products and systems.

Table 40: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings for All Other Products – Instant Rebate Product T5 and T8 High Bay LED Lighting Systems LED Wall Pack and Garage LED Ref. Strip Lighting Other LEDs Induction High Bay Induction W...

AI summary Table 40 provides evaluation results for net energy and demand savings across various lighting products under the Instant Rebate program. It includes metrics such as total gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, and line loss factor for different product categories.

6 OVERALL BER RESULTS This section summarizes the overall results of the impact evaluation for BER. With combined net savings generated from both mail-in rebate and instant rebate approaches, the total energy and demand savings have amount...

AI summary This section summarizes the overall results of the impact evaluation for the Building Energy Rebate (BER) program, reporting total energy and demand savings of 21.858 GWh and 6.285 MW respectively, achieved through both mail-in rebate and instant rebate approaches.

CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of BER demonstrated that the program had undergone a series of changes, creating an intensified impact on the market. In fact, BER has grown in both range and scale, expanding from offering only mail-in rebat...

AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Building Energy Rebate (BER) program showed significant improvements in its range, scale, and impact since the 2011 evaluation. The program expanded to include instant rebates and new equipment categories, and ENSC implemented key recommendations. Net energy savings and demand savings increased substantially in 2012, though some distributors noted competition from other BNI programs.

Executive Summary 1. Analyze product offering to reduce duplicate rebates and program overlapping in the market: Some eligible measures covered by the BER instant rebate approach are also covered by other BNI programs (BES and Custom Retro...

AI summary The analysis highlights that some products eligible for the BER instant rebate are also covered by other BNI programs, leading to potential duplication. Distributors confirmed that many of these products are sold through other ENSC programs. Econoler recommends limiting the BER instant rebate to products with low market penetration to avoid overlap.

Executive Summary 2. Improve the tracking sheet to facilitate effective validation of savings\ : Improvements to both mail-in and instant rebate tracking sheets could be made to facilitate analyzing energy and demand savings calculated for...

AI summary The executive summary outlines recommendations for improving the tracking sheet, defining full load hours based on building characteristics, and introducing tighter control on product requirements to improve the accuracy and reliability of energy savings calculations in efficiency programs.

High-performance or low wattage T8 lamps I have a few questions about your sales of high-performance and low (reduced) wattage T8 lamps that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. products. Our records indicate that your tota...

AI summary The text discusses questions regarding the sales of high-performance and low wattage T8 lamps, promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program, and explores whether the program's incentives significantly influenced sales figures in 2012 compared to previous years.

E1. If the current trend is maintained, your total sales for high-performance ballasts in 2012 will be significantly lower/higher ( select the appropriate term ) than for the previous year. Is there any reason for this change? [PROBE: mark...

AI summary The text asks about potential changes in sales of high-performance ballasts in 2012, considering market trends and the impact of the Business Energy Rebates Program. It inquires whether sales would have been lower without the incentive provided by the program.

APPENDIX III – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL 1. General Information Date of visit: Project Name: Project Tracking sheet #: Company Name: Contact Name: Address: Telephone: Type of facility: Retail: College/ University:   Manufacturing/ Industria...

AI summary This document outlines an on-site visit protocol used for collecting general information and building heating/cooling system details during energy efficiency assessments. It includes fields for project tracking, company information, facility type, and heating system specifics.

APPENDIX IV – FIRMOGRAPHICS The profile of the program participants interviewed for the survey is presented in the following tables. Energy costs account for 14.7% of the annual operating budget on average.

AI summary The appendix provides firmographics data from a survey, noting that energy costs make up 14.7% of the annual operating budget on average.

Table 43: Energy Costs as a Percentage of Annual Operating Budget Percentage of Budget 2011 (# ) 2012 (% ) Sample Size 15 43 Less than 10% 6 37% 10-19% 2 26% 20% or more 7 37% Don't know Average Percentage 20.3% 14.7% Don't know removed fr...

AI summary Table 43 presents energy costs as a percentage of annual operating budgets for 2011 and 2012, showing a decrease in the average percentage from 20.3% to 14.7% over the period. The sample size increased from 15 to 43, with the majority of respondents reporting energy costs of 20% or more in both years.

Barriers to Actions & Recommendations for Improvements [B Series] - B1. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in implementing the energy efficient measures for which you received a rebate from the Business Energy Rebates Pro...

AI summary The text outlines barriers and recommendations related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, including challenges such as concerns about bill savings, lack of information, and paperwork issues. It also asks for suggestions to improve the program, such as better marketing, more information, and improved forms.

Sampling error The amount of inaccuracy in estimating some value that is caused by examining only a portion of a population (i.e. a sample) rather than the whole population. Sample size The number of observations or replicates included in...

AI summary The text defines key statistical and energy efficiency terms, including sampling error, sample size, spillover, and tracked savings, which are relevant to program evaluations and energy efficiency initiatives.

llation rate was very low in comparison with the number of fixtures claimed by the participants, most of these discrepancies were very small and called for only minimal adjustements to ENSC's savings. Reviewing the 31 project folders also...

AI summary The document discusses discrepancies in the energy savings reported by participants in lighting retrofit projects, noting that the adjustment needed was minimal. It also highlights an issue with the interactive effect calculation methodology used by ENSC, which employs specific coefficients to estimate heating impacts from lighting installations.

Adjustments to the Ice Rink Projects (IREP) As for IREP projects, due to the particularities of the impact evaluation activies as well as the simplicity and replicability of the typical energy efficiency measures implemented, Econoler deci...

AI summary The evaluation of IREP ice rink projects found that energy savings claims were fully approved, but demand savings required an adjustment due to an overly conservative diversity factor used by ENSC. Adjustments were made on a case-by-case basis for three projects, with no changes to energy savings.

Table 16: Adjustment Factors for Gross Energy and Demand Savings Calculations Adjustment Ratios Project Type Gross Energy Savings Gross Peak Demand Savings Lighting Retrofit Only 0.976 1.106 Ice Rink Projects (IREP) 1.000 1.056 Other Custo...

AI summary Table 16 outlines adjustment factors for gross energy and demand savings calculations for various project types. The text notes that Econoler's analysis already accounts for interactive effects on heating and cooling systems and diversity factors, eliminating the need for additional calculations.

The details of the energy and peak demand savings calculated for the three project types mentioned above are presented in the table below, which indicates the savings at both the meter and the generator. Savings at the generator level were...

AI summary The document presents energy and peak demand savings for three project types, calculated at both the meter and generator levels. Generator-level savings account for transmission and distribution losses using line loss factors provided by Nova Scotia Power. For Custom Retrofit projects in 2012, energy savings are estimated at 30.102 GWh at the meter and 31.960 GWh at the generator, with corresponding peak demand savings of 3.451 MW and 3.679 MW.

[RECORD RESPONSE 0-10; 97=NON APPLICABLE; 98=DON'T KNOW; 99=REFUSED] - a. The program financial incentives and/or on-bill financing [STATE IF ASKED WHAT 'ON BILL FINANCING' IS: Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom program offers on-the-bill fin...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to energy efficiency programs, including on-bill financing, technical assistance, scoping and feasibility studies, corporate policies, industry standards, energy efficiency codes, and prior program experience.

PA1 Score: MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a ; FR2b) IF PRE-SCREENING: 0% FR1. Before participating in the program, did your company have plans to implement the specific energy efficiency measures that were implemented through the program? IF 1. Yes: U...

AI summary This section outlines a scoring methodology for evaluating energy efficiency programs. It asks whether companies had pre-existing plans to implement energy efficiency measures and whether they would have financed projects without financial incentives or onbill financing from ENSC.

Revised Savings Calculation Econoler based its savings review on the results of the on-site visit conducted at the plant where the motors were installed, as well as on in-depth analysis of the technical documentation provided by ENSC. Duri...

AI summary Econoler revised the energy and demand savings calculation after verifying discrepancies in motor efficiency and load factor. The actual motor efficiency was found to be 93% instead of 95%, and the load factor of 80% was omitted from the initial calculation. The revised calculation included peak demand savings.

On-Site Visit Protocol - Custom Projects 5. On-Site Observations and Findings Report the on-site visit and indicate the key observations and findings made on site. 6. Energy and Demand Savings Adjustments Energy Savings from Tracking Sheet...

AI summary The document outlines a protocol for on-site visits related to custom projects, focusing on energy and demand savings adjustments. It includes sections for reporting observations, tracking energy savings, and using diversity factors for evaluation.

4.3.3 Adjusted Gross Savings The 2012 gross energy savings detailed in the ENSC tracking sheet were revised to include the adjustments calculated by the Evaluator following a comparison of the project savings computed by Econoler against t...

AI summary The 2012 gross energy savings were revised based on adjustments calculated by the Evaluator after comparing Econoler's project savings with those in the tracking sheet. The adjustment calculation was divided into two categories depending on whether the NCEM or CPG program paths were used.

gram savings), the major part of its insulation work (which was actually its only energy efficiency measure for which savings was claimed in 2012) was not yet completed. 6 All things considered, Econoler concluded that all the energy and d...

AI summary The evaluation of NC projects under the NCEM approach identified issues with energy efficiency savings claims, particularly regarding incomplete insulation work and discrepancies between feasibility studies and tracked savings. Adjustments were made, and challenges in evaluating demand savings were noted due to insufficient data on assumptions and diversity factors.

Adjustments to NC Projects Conducted under the CPG Approach As mentioned in Section [4.3.2,](#page-113-0) the Evaluator decided to accept the energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENSC without making any adjustment for the sole NC proj...

AI summary The Evaluator accepted energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENSC for an NC project under the CPG approach without adjustments, due to difficulties verifying compliance assumptions. A conservative estimate was used for peak demand savings calculations.

Table 4: Adjustment Factors for Gross Energy Savings Calculations Adjustment Ratios Program Path Gross Energy Savings Gross Peak Demand Savings NCEM Path 0.984 0.836 CPG Path 1.000 1.000 The adjustment factors in the table above are presen...

AI summary Table 4 provides adjustment factors for gross energy savings calculations under the NCEM and CPG paths. The factors are used to adjust energy savings calculations for projects analyzed in 2012, based on project-specific documentation reviews.

on-site visit's observations. It is also worth noting that all the gross impact assessments described by Econoler so far in the report have already taken into account the interactive effects on space heating and cooling systems as well as...

AI summary The document discusses energy and peak demand savings for the 2012 overall gross energy savings for NC, estimating 5.918 GWh at the meter and 6.276 GWh at the generator. It also mentions peak demand savings of 0.669 MW at the meter and 0.710 MW at the generator, calculated using line loss factors provided by Nova Scotia Power.

Table 5: Evaluation Results – Revised Savings in Tracking Sheet Program Path NCEM Projects CPG Projects Total for all NC Projects Number of Projects 7 1 8 Program Tracking Sheets Total Tracked Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 5.831 0.18...

AI summary Table 5 presents evaluation results for revised savings in tracking sheets, showing energy and demand savings from NCEM and CPG projects. It includes metrics such as total tracked energy savings, adjustment ratios, and gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.

Table 6: 2012 Net Energy Savings for NC at the Generator Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) Evaluation Results – Gross Savin...

AI summary Table 6 presents the 2012 net energy and demand savings for NC at the generator, comparing gross savings, NTGR values, and net savings across different metrics. It highlights the difference between energy savings measured at the meter and at the generator level.

A7. As part of its New Construction Program, Efficiency Nova Scotia offers financial incentives to help the implementation of energy-saving projects. If your company or organisation had not received the financial incentives from Efficiency...

AI summary The text presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia's New Construction Program, asking respondents about their willingness to pay for energy-saving projects without financial incentives or financing. The questions aim to assess the impact of these programs on project implementation.

Factor Response (scale of 0 to 10) a. The program financial incentives and/or financing ResponseN/A b. The technical assistance provided by the program during the design development ResponseN/A c. The technical assistance offered by the pr...

AI summary The table outlines various factors related to a program's financial incentives, technical assistance, and corporate policies, but all responses are marked as N/A, indicating no information provided. The context includes references to Efficiency Nova Scotia and Nova Scotia Power.

Please fill the table below for each cooling system at the site Description Cooling system 1 Cooling system 2 Cooling system 3 Cooling system 4 Energy source (electricity, natural gas, oil, etc.) Cooling system type (compressor, absorption...

AI summary The text provides a table template for documenting cooling systems at a site, including energy sources, system types, capacities, efficiency metrics, and energy usage data. It also includes sections for project details and design process strategies.

Table 2: Overall Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BES Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC...

AI summary Table 2 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings for the Business Energy Solutions (BES) program, showing discrepancies between initial gross savings and net savings after accounting for interactive effects. The Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) is used to calculate net savings by dividing net savings by installed gross savings.

nt participants from always choosing "Other". Regarding the fields for rate codes and contact information, these fields are mandatory since the end of 2012, which should correct the situation rapidly. - > Collect information on the heating...

AI summary The text discusses the need to collect information on heating energy sources and air conditioning usage in tracking sheets, as well as the importance of setting limitations to standardize data entry and reduce errors. This information is crucial for calculations related to interactive effects factors.

Unitary Wattage A review of the unitary wattage values used in the gross savings calculations was conducted for each category of product identified in the tracking sheet. Three types of replacement can be done through this program: - > lam...

AI summary The document discusses the validation of unitary wattage values used in energy savings calculations for lighting products. It highlights discrepancies in ballast factor considerations for different product types, especially in lamp-only replacements and hardwired CFLs, metal halide, and high pressure sodium fixtures. Adjustments were made for T8 fluorescents but not for other categories due to their minimal impact on overall savings.

4.2.2 Unitary Savings for Non-Lighting Measures Non-lighting measures were added to the program at the end of 2012. For this year, three heat pumps were implemented in participating facilities. For each different model, the savings were ca...

AI summary Non-lighting measures, specifically heat pumps, were added to the program in 2012. Annual energy and demand savings for each heat pump model are calculated using equations based on capacity, HSPF values, and full load hours.

Hours of Operation To estimate the savings of the CFLs installed, ENSC uses hours of operation totalling 8.53 hours per day for 13-watt CFLs and 10.29 hours per day for 23-watt CFLs. These values are based on the hours declared by site con...

AI summary ENSC uses hours of operation data from the 2011 EP-DI program to estimate savings from CFL installations. Due to a lack of current data, Econoler applied a self-declaration ratio of 0.98 to adjust the hours of operation. ENSC plans to collect this data directly in 2013 using a unified tracking sheet for SBES and CDI.

5.3 REVISED GROSS SAVINGS The annual gross savings for each product category installed through CDI are presented in Table 33. They were calculated using the revised unitary savings and the installation rate established in the previous sect...

AI summary The revised gross savings for each product category installed through CDI are presented, with total energy and demand savings at the meter amounting to 13.173 GWh and 1.238 MW. At the generator level, these savings are estimated at 14.279 GWh and 1.342 MW, calculated using a line loss factor of 1.084 provided by Nova Scotia Power.

5.4 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS Interactive effects occur when the installation of energy-efficient products has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling systems. As far as CDI is concerned, the replacement...

AI summary Interactive effects refer to changes in energy consumption caused by energy-efficient product installations, such as lighting and hot water tank wraps. The text discusses how these changes impact heating and cooling loads, using specific factors derived from studies and simulations conducted in Quebec. The weighted interactive effects factor for lighting products is -15.5%, and for hot water tank wraps, the factors are -100% for heating and +100% for cooling.

Table 39: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator – CDI Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 14.242 GW...

AI summary Table 39 compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Commercial Demand Improvement (CDI) program. Evaluated savings are slightly higher than tracked savings, with Energy Nova Scotia (ENSC) using a conservative 83% installation rate for lighting products to ensure accuracy in their estimates.

6.2 GROSS SAVINGS A total of 239 facilities participated in this pilot initiative. Various LED products were installed. For each category of product, the Evaluator computed the quantity installed and reviewed the unitary savings value used...

AI summary A pilot initiative involving 239 facilities installed various LED products. ENSC calculated unitary savings values for these products, with some values adjusted to be more conservative compared to those used in the CDI program. Econoler reviewed these values as presented in the following sections.

Hours of Operation For the LED lamps installed under CDI, Econoler used daily hours of operation of 10.7 hours. This value was established for the different types of facilities that participated in CDI. For the LED Blitz pilot, Econoler ch...

AI summary The document discusses the hours of operation for LED lamps and exit signs under the CDI and LED Blitz pilot initiatives. Econoler used 10.7 hours per day for CDI lamps and 12.8 hours per day for the LED Blitz pilot, tailored to the specific businesses involved. LED exit signs are assumed to operate 24/7.

6.3 REVISED GROSS SAVINGS The annual gross savings for each LED product installed through the LED Blitz pilot are presented in Table 42. They were calculated using the revised unitary savings established in the previous section. Overall, t...

AI summary The revised gross savings from the LED Blitz pilot are calculated and presented, showing total energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels. The line loss factor used in the calculation was provided by Nova Scotia Power and based on participants' rate codes.

Table 44: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator – LED Blitz Pilot Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from EN...

AI summary The table compares tracked and evaluated savings from the LED Blitz Pilot, showing that evaluated savings exceeded tracked savings by 25%. This is due to revised unitary savings values for LED products and conservative assumptions used by ENSC in calculating net savings.

7 OVERALL BES RESULTS This section summarizes the overall results of the impact evaluation for BES. When combining the net savings generated from both SBES and CDI, the total energy and demand savings amount to 30.152 GWh and 5.244 MW resp...

AI summary The overall results of the Building Energy Survey (BES) impact evaluation show total energy and demand savings of 30.152 GWh and 5.244 MW, respectively, combining savings from SBES and CDI.

Table 45: Overall Comparisons of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BES Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS...

AI summary Table 45 compares tracked and evaluated savings from Energy Savings and Demand Savings for BES. It shows differences in initial gross savings, installed gross savings, and net savings between tracked savings from ENSC and evaluation results, with NTGR values indicating the ratio of net to gross savings.

Executive Summary 2. Include a ballast factor in the unitary wattage calculation of hardwired CFLs, metal halide fixtures and high pressure sodium fixtures\ : The impact evaluation of SBES revealed some inconsistencies in the approach used...

AI summary The evaluation of the SBES program identified inconsistencies in the unitary wattage calculation for certain lighting products, as ENSC did not account for the ballast factor in new installations. Additionally, inconsistencies in tracking product removals were noted, necessitating the development of a validation process to ensure accurate data entry and deductions.

Tracking Sheet CDI - 10. Make sure that all the fields are systematically filled out: The Evaluator noted that some fields were left blank: - Business type: This field could be useful for evaluating some unitary savings values, which vary...

AI summary The tracking sheet for Commercial Demand Improvement (CDI) has several fields that are frequently left blank, which could affect the accuracy of evaluations. Fields such as business type, contact information, rate code, and water heating type are not consistently filled out. Recommendations include expanding the list of business types, making certain fields mandatory, and standardizing data entry to improve data quality and facilitate impact evaluations.

Econoler revised the savings after reviewing the parameters used in the savings calculations and results of the on-site metering study. As for the unitary wattage value, Econoler noticed that no ballast factor was considered for the newly...

AI summary Econoler revised energy savings calculations following a review of parameters and an on-site metering study. Adjustments included correcting the unitary wattage value by excluding the ballast factor for the new lamp and using only the lamp wattage of the old lamp. An average self-declaration ratio of 0.98 was applied to T8 fluorescent lighting measures based on metering study results.

DEFINITIONS Demand savings Savings occurring at specific peak hours of energy demand. Diversity factor The ratio of the sum of the individual maximum demands of the various subsystems to the maximum demand of the whole system. Energy Effic...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and electrical systems, including demand savings, diversity factor, energy efficiency ratio, evaluated savings, gross energy savings, and line loss factor. These definitions are relevant to regulatory and technical discussions in the energy sector.

3.1.4 Estimation of the Market Size In a report prepared for NRCan, Nielsen Engineering analyzed sales data supplied by the Electrical Equipment Manufacturers Association of Canada (EEMAC). 25 Using Excel's trend function, Nielsen Engineer...

AI summary This section discusses the estimation of the market size for three-phase electric motors in Canada and Nova Scotia, using sales data from EEMAC and demographic weights. Nielsen Engineering and Econoler used extrapolation methods to estimate market sizes for 2010 and 2012.

3.4.4 Estimation of the Market Size Caneta Research produced a report in 2010 for NRCan regarding the market and economics of the commercial refrigeration equipment market in Canada. 64 While this report does not provide the market size of...

AI summary Caneta Research estimated the commercial refrigeration equipment market size in Canada in 2009 using data from the U.S. DOE and HRAI, resulting in an estimate of 19,300 shipments. For self-contained commercial ice cream-type freezers, the report provides specific figures for 2012, with 72 opaque and 1,494 transparent units shipped to Canada.

3.6.4 Estimation of the Market Size With regard to the market size of SPVAC and SPVHP, NRCan mentions that the majority of the appliances that are sold "are less than 65,000 Btu/h in cooling capacity." Moreover, NRCan writes that "in Canad...

AI summary The market size for SPVAC and SPVHP in Canada and Nova Scotia is estimated using shipment data from 2006, with an assumed growth rate of 27.6% between 2006 and 2012. The data is sourced from Caneta Research and NRCan, with the majority of shipments being air conditioners.

3.7.4 Estimation of the Market Size The initial estimate of the market size of these products was based on a study produced by Ecos. Using different sources such as the 2008 Consumer Electronics Market (CEM) Trends and Forecast and Navigan...

AI summary The market size for standby power products in Canada and Nova Scotia was estimated using data from Ecos, based on shipment data from 2002 to 2007 and projected to 2012 using Excel trend formulas and scatter plots. The estimate for Nova Scotia was based on its demographic weight.

3.7.6 Unitary Savings Values In Amendment 11 , NRCan provided unitary savings values for integrated stereos, portable audio products, television, non-recording video players and recording video players. It also estimated average unitary sa...

AI summary This section discusses the unitary savings values for various electronic products provided by NRCan in Amendment 11, including integrated stereos, portable audio products, and video players. Ecos did not provide specific market size data for clock radios, so they were grouped under the 'integrated stereo' category. Econoler followed this methodology for their study.

PROBE: The Office of Energy Efficiency has estimated that […] would be impacted for the whole Canadian market. Do those proportions seem appropriate to you? Provide an explanation. Products Proportion Impacted by the New Standard Integrate...

AI summary The Office of Energy Efficiency has estimated that various audio and video products would be impacted by new energy efficiency standards. The table shows the proportion of each product category affected, and the probe asks if these proportions seem appropriate.