E-1-1Application
47 passages
3.1 Summary The Preferred Plan sets out the level of energy and demand savings which will provide the best value for Nova Scotians at an affordable investment level while delivering a carefully balanced portfolio that has been developed th...
AI summary The Preferred Plan aims to provide affordable energy and demand savings through enhanced programs and new initiatives, targeting underserved markets and increasing energy savings from non-lighting measures. It is projected to achieve 141 GWh of annual energy savings over three years with an investment of approximately $43 million per year.
Table 1: 2020-2022 Preferred Plan Performance Metrics Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted- Average Measure Life (years) Peak Demand Savings (MW)...
AI summary Table 1 presents performance metrics for the 2020-2022 Preferred Plan, including investment, energy savings, and cost tests. The data shows increasing investment and energy savings over the years, with metrics such as lifetime benefits, peak demand savings, and TRC/PAC tests.
1 Highlights of the Preferred Plan 2 - 3 Highlights of the Preferred Plan include: - 4 First-Year energy savings = 1.3 percent of electricity generation; - Cumulative net lifetime CO2 reductions = 3,180 MT[12](#page-18-2) 5 ; - 6 Lifetime...
AI summary The Preferred Plan highlights first-year energy savings of 1.3% of electricity generation, cumulative net lifetime CO2 reductions of 3,180 MT, a lifetime unit cost of $0.022/kWh, and net system benefits of $493.6 million. The plan also indicates a 55% increase in non-lighting energy savings over historical levels.
11 Key Considerations that informed the Preferred Plan 12 - 13 EfficiencyOne was guided by three key considerations in developing the Preferred 14 Plan: - 15 Maximizing Energy Savings (customer value); - 16 Ensuring a Balanced Portfolio (c...
AI summary EfficiencyOne developed the Preferred Plan based on three key considerations: maximizing energy savings, ensuring a balanced portfolio, and establishing an appropriate investment level. The plan aims to increase energy savings from 1.2% to 1.3% annually, resulting in approximately 141 GWh of savings per year, with an average annual cost of $43 million.
22 5.1.3 Does diversifying away from lighting increase first-year unit cost? 23 24 Yes. 25 26 The overall unit cost of the Preferred Plan has increased from an estimated first-year 37 David Hill Direct Evidence February 27, 2019, page 8, l...
AI summary The text discusses the increase in first-year unit costs of the Preferred Plan from 2016-2018 to 2020-2022, noting that the removal of lighting measures from the plan has contributed to an increase in unit costs, with adjusted 2016-2018 unit costs estimated at approximately $0.27/kWh.
2016-2018 (2018 not finalized) First Year Energy Savings (GWh) First Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lighting Removed Fully Allocated Spend ($M) Fully Allocated Spend ($M) Lighting Removed Fully Allocated Unit Cost ($/kWh) Fully Allocated Unit C...
AI summary The table presents energy savings and costs associated with various programs from 2016 to 2018, including residential, BNI, and Enabling Strategies initiatives. It outlines energy savings in gigawatt-hours, fully allocated spend in millions of dollars, and unit costs per kilowatt-hour.
30 o Determine potential for costs reduction (e.g., test effectiveness of remote 1 strategies in order for Nova Scotians to meet energy and demand savings targets now 27 machine-learning and artificial intelligence) to: 28 Develop more cus...
AI summary The text outlines strategies for Nova Scotians to meet energy and demand savings targets, including the use of machine learning and AI for customized customer offerings, energy audits, and reliance on usage data for measurement and verification. EfficiencyOne is committed to cost management through benchmarking, competitive procurement, independent reviews, and process improvement to meet performance targets.
1 58 increase. 2 3 Further, the Preferred Plan's increase in unit cost compared to historical performance 4 as a result of diversification away from lighting is consistent with industry trends;59 5 therefore, this should not be used as a b...
AI summary The Preferred Plan's increased unit cost is attributed to diversification away from lighting, aligning with industry trends and not indicating a lack of cost-effectiveness. The plan's higher investment is justified by the evolving DSM market and is consistent with past expenditures. Utilizing HST savings to subsidize DSM investment is recommended, as it provides significant returns to ratepayers.
14 15 Figure 2: NS Power 2018 operating costs as a percentage of annual electric 16 revenues NS Power - 2018 Operating Costs as % of Annual Electric Revenues $ Million % of Total Annual Electric Revenues $ 1,412 Fuel 593 42.0% Operating, M...
AI summary The text presents a table showing NS Power's 2018 operating costs as a percentage of annual electric revenues, highlighting that fuel costs account for the largest share (42.0%), followed by depreciation and amortization (15.5%) and operating, maintenance, and general expenses (17.8%).
15 16 While annual energy and demand savings provide useful information on the annual 17 level of DSM resources acquired (e.g. energy and capacity savings), Lifetime Energy 18 Savings provides additional useful information which is more cl...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of Lifetime Energy Savings as a more accurate measure of the long-term benefits of Demand Side Management (DSM) programs compared to annual energy savings. It highlights how different lifetimes of DSM measures can significantly impact lifetime energy savings and, consequently, the total ratepayer benefits.
23 Table 12: Alternate Scenario performance metrics Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted-Average Measure Life (years) Peak Demand Savings (MW) To...
AI summary Table 12 presents performance metrics for alternate scenarios, showing investment, energy savings, and cost tests from 2020 to 2022. It highlights increasing investments and benefits over time, with consistent energy savings and improvements in cost tests.
-14 effective energy solutions; - 15 providing accessibility for a wider variety of market sectors and customer 16 segments; and - 17 increasing the level of system-peak demand reduction benefits. 18 19 EfficiencyOne also considered afford...
AI summary EfficiencyOne evaluated the 2020-2022 Preferred Plan, noting minor rate increases (0.8–1.7%) and bill reductions (1–11%) for customers. The plan offsets nearly 6,000 GWh of energy production and reduces annual peak demand by 120 MW, with lifetime benefits exceeding $600 million.
2 3 The 2020-2022 Preferred Plan represents a comprehensive suite of programs and 4 service offerings for Nova Scotia electricity customers. The main goal of each program 5 is to help reduce electricity costs for consumers. Further objecti...
AI summary The 2020-2022 Preferred Plan aims to reduce electricity costs for consumers, increase awareness of energy efficiency, and promote the adoption of energy-efficient technologies. It outlines energy savings, CO2 reductions, and net system benefits over the plan period.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Portfolio total cost-effectiveness test...
AI summary The document discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from NS Power's 2014 IRP, and provides estimates of CO2 reductions from the 2020-2022 Preferred Plan. It references program investment budgets, cost-effectiveness tests, and the use of TRC and PAC ratios for evaluation.
Table 3: 2020 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...
AI summary Table 3 outlines the 2020 Preferred DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, energy savings, and cost tests for residential and business programs in Nova Scotia. It highlights investments in efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and enabling strategies, along with their associated lifetime benefits and energy savings.
Table 4: 2021 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the 2021 Preferred DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests for residential and non-residential DSM programs in Nova Scotia.
Table 5: 2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, detailing investments, benefits, and energy savings across residential and non-residential programs. It includes metrics like TRC and PAC, and highlights the total investment and savings for various initiatives.
- increase customer and retailer awareness of energy efficiency opportunities; 1 increase system-peak demand for energy efficient products; • 2 increase the availability of energy-efficient products at retailers; • 3 increase customer and...
AI summary The Efficient Products Rebates program aims to increase awareness of energy efficiency opportunities, promote the use of energy-efficient products, and remove inefficient appliances from the Nova Scotia electricity system. The program targets residential customers, including low-income and renter groups, and addresses barriers such as affordability, awareness, short decision periods, lack of trust, and lack of information.
1 Table 8: 2020-2022 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Low-Income 2 Performance Indicators Year First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Participation (units)a 2020 0.4 2.7 0.04 1,996 2021...
AI summary Table 8 outlines the performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Low-Income program from 2020 to 2022, showing energy savings, peak demand savings, and participation numbers over the three years.
Table 9: 2020-2022 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators - Comparison of Preferred and Alternate Plans Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Sa...
AI summary Table 9 compares the performance indicators of the Preferred and Alternate plans for residential efficient product rebates from 2020 to 2022, showing metrics like investment, energy savings, and cost tests. The Alternate plan shows slightly lower investment and savings compared to the Preferred plan across all years, with consistent -11% variance in most metrics.
Table 10: 2020-2022 Existing Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost...
AI summary Table 10 presents residential performance indicators for the years 2020-2022, detailing investments, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs associated with energy efficiency programs. It includes metrics such as total resource cost test, program administrator cost test, and participation statistics across various categories.
26 Page 44 of 95 & lt;sup>b PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to EfficiencyOne's costs. & lt;sup>c The number of individual products rebated through Efficient Product Installation, Green Heat, Home Energy Assessment,...
AI summary The text provides definitions and explanations of various metrics used in energy efficiency programs, including the benefit/cost ratio (PAC), levelized and nominal cost of saved energy, and the number of households and projects participating in specific programs such as Efficient Product Installation, Green Heat, and Affordable Multifamily Renter Program.
Table 14: New Residential Performance Indicators - Comparison of Preferred and Alternate Plans Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost...
AI summary Table 14 compares the performance indicators of preferred and alternate plans for new residential energy efficiency initiatives. It includes metrics such as investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost indicators for both scenarios over the years 2020 to 2022. The alternate plan shows slightly lower investment and energy savings compared to the preferred plan.
3 Table 15: Preferred Plan: BNI Sector Offerings Program Program Target Market Delivery Enhancements Component Segment Approach in 2020-2022 Custom Custom Existing and new Facilitated and New system • Incentives construction BNI financial...
AI summary Table 15 outlines the BNI Sector Offerings under the Preferred Plan, detailing various energy efficiency programs, their target markets, delivery methods, and enhancements for the period 2020-2022. These include custom incentives, energy management systems, direct installation solutions, and product rebates aimed at reducing peak demand and promoting energy efficiency.
Table 16: 2020-2022 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energ Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Peak Demand Savings Savings (GWh) (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrat...
AI summary Table 16 outlines the performance indicators for the BNI Efficient Product Rebates program from 2020 to 2022, including investment, energy savings, cost metrics, and participation levels. The data shows consistent growth in energy savings and participation over the years.
Table 18: Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) Performance Indicators - Comparison of Preferred and Alternate Plans Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Tota...
AI summary Table 18 compares the performance indicators of the Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) program under preferred and alternate plans from 2020 to 2022. It includes metrics such as investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost indicators. The data shows the preferred plan outperforms the alternate plan in several areas, including energy savings and participation.
5.2.1 Overview The Custom Incentives program provides financial incentives and technical assistance to help non-profit, institutional, commercial and industrial customers reduce their electrical energy consumption and system-peak demand. S...
AI summary The Custom Incentives program offers financial and technical support to non-profit, institutional, commercial, and industrial customers to reduce electrical energy consumption and system-peak demand. It is tailored to project-specific needs and focuses on energy efficiency and demand reduction initiatives not covered by other ENS programs.
- influence electrical energy efficiency and system-peak demand reduction 1 projects within Nova Scotia; 2 • build awareness around the benefits of energy efficiency to program participants; 3 • increase awareness of cost-effective energy...
AI summary The document outlines goals for influencing electrical energy efficiency and reducing system-peak demand through various initiatives, including increasing awareness of energy efficiency options, helping customers overcome barriers to implementing complex projects, and diversifying program offerings. It also highlights market barriers such as financial constraints and upfront costs for feasibility studies.
Table 19: 2020-2022 Custom Incentives Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Tes...
AI summary Table 19 provides performance indicators for the BNI Custom Incentives Program from 2020 to 2022, showing investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost metrics over the period.
Table 24: Direct Installation Performance Indicators - Comparison of Preferred and Alternate Plans Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource C...
AI summary Table 24 compares the performance indicators of preferred and alternate plans for direct installation, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost metrics. The preferred plan shows higher investment and energy savings compared to the alternate plan, with the alternate plan having lower costs but lower overall savings.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Total cost-effectiveness tests are calc...
AI summary The text discusses avoided costs of energy and capacity from NS Power's 2014 IRP, as well as avoided costs of transmission and distribution from 2018. It also outlines how total cost-effectiveness tests are calculated and defines TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios used in efficiency programs.
1 7. CONCLUSION 2 This analysis captures the impacts of 2020-2022 DSM programs to customer rates 3 and bills throughout the full lifetime of the DSM impacts. Over the lifetime of 4 measures installed in 2020-2022, NS Power customers will s...
AI summary This conclusion discusses the long-term benefits of DSM programs from 2020-2022, including customer savings of over $475 million. It highlights the Total Resource Cost and Program Administrator Cost ratios, rate increases, and bill savings. The analysis also acknowledges the limitations of the evaluation and mentions future improvements to the model.
DATE FILED: 28 February 2019 Page 1 of 16 e# Rate and Bil I Impacts of DSM on the R esidenti al Class - PREFE RRED P LAN Impacts of DSM on the Residential Rate Class 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 202...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing the impacts of Demand Side Management (DSM) on the residential rate class from 2011 to 2035, including incremental and cumulative DSM savings, costs, participant numbers, and the levelized cost of saved energy. The data shows increasing savings and costs starting in 2020, with a peak in 2022, followed by stabilization.
This graph shows annual program participation for the class, as a percentage of total customers in the class. Each customer is counted once for each year that they participate in any program. # Rate a nd Bill Ir npacts o f DSM or the Sm al...
AI summary This table and graph analyze the impact of demand-side management (DSM) programs on the small industrial rate class in Nova Scotia. It shows participation rates, incremental and cumulative savings, costs, and the levelized cost of saved energy from 2011 to 2035.
Rate a nd Bill I mpacts o f DSM on the Lar ge Indust rial Clas s - PREF ERRED F PLAN Impacts of DSM on the Large Industrial Rate Class 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031...
AI summary The table presents the impacts of demand-side management (DSM) on the large industrial rate class from 2011 to 2035, including incremental and cumulative DSM savings, DSM costs, number of participants, and levelized cost of saved energy. DSM savings begin in 2020 and plateau by 2023, with costs and participant numbers remaining stable after 2020.
Page 13 of 16 Rate a nd Bill I mpacts of of DSM or า the Lar ge Indus trial Clas s - ALTE RNATE F PLAN Impacts of DSM on the Large Industrial Rate Class 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2...
AI summary This table presents the impacts of the Large Industrial Class Demand-Side Management (DSM) Plan from 2011 to 2035, including incremental and cumulative DSM savings, DSM costs, participant numbers, and the levelized cost of saved energy. Savings and costs are shown over time, with notable data starting in 2020.
Table 1: 2020-2022 Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted-Average Measure Life (years) Peak...
AI summary Table 1 outlines the investment and savings from 2020 to 2022 under an alternate DSM resource scenario. It shows increasing investments and savings in energy and peak demand, along with metrics like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC). The data comes from NS Power and includes avoided costs from the 2014 IRP and 2018 updates.
14 15 16 Tables 2, 3, and 4 provide the program-level savings and investment for 2020, 2021, and 2022 respectively. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy, capacity, trans...
AI summary Tables 2, 3, and 4 present program-level savings and investment data for 2020, 2021, and 2022. The text explains that lifetime benefits are calculated as the net present value of avoided costs, including energy, capacity, transmission, and distribution, using the utility WACC. TRC and PAC are defined as benefit/cost ratios comparing lifetime benefits to the combined costs of EfficiencyOne and participants, and to EfficiencyOne's costs, respectively.
Table 2: Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TR...
AI summary Table 2 outlines investment and savings for alternate Demand-Side Management (DSM) resource scenarios in 2020, including residential and business programs, with details on energy savings, peak demand reductions, and cost tests. The data reflects avoided costs provided by NS Power from the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2018 transmission and distribution costs.
Table 3: 2021 Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Tes...
AI summary Table 3 presents the 2021 investment and savings data for alternate Demand-Side Management (DSM) resource scenarios, including program-specific investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests. The data is provided by Nova Scotia Power and includes information from the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2018 transmission and distribution avoided costs.
& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy, capacity, transmission and distribution, over the life of the program measures, using the utility WACC. b TRC is a benefit/cost rat...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits for energy efficiency programs, using net present value of avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios such as TRC and PAC. It also references EfficiencyOne's planned participation in low-income programs and specific rebate initiatives.
Table 4: 2022 Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Tes...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the 2022 Alternate DSM Resource Scenario Investment and Savings, showing various programs and their associated investments, benefits, and savings. This data includes residential and non-residential programs, with details on energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost tests such as TRC and PAC.
- 4 A: Yes. As we see in Table 2, lighting average unit costs continue to decline. Many program - 5 administrators have now realized reduced costs for lighting programs by shifting initiatives from a - 6 downstream approach (direct-to-cust...
AI summary The text discusses the declining average unit costs for lighting programs due to shifts in initiative approaches, such as moving from downstream to midstream or upstream strategies. It acknowledges that while lighting savings may decline, there will still be cost-effective opportunities and continued need for market support.
9 2020 and 2018 - 2037 Performance output Total 2018-2020 Total 2018-2037 Annual MWh, net 375,069 1,933,683 Lifetime MWh, net 3,759,301 22,993,891 First-year summer peak kW, net 48,180 260,913 Lifetime summer peak kW, net 472,358 3,276,277...
AI summary The text presents performance outputs for energy efficiency programs over two timeframes: 2018-2020 and 2018-2037. It includes metrics such as MWh saved, peak kW reductions, cost effectiveness ratios, societal benefits, and greenhouse gas reductions. These figures highlight the projected impact of energy efficiency initiatives.
tates' DSM - Program Administrators (PAs) on their residential new construction, demand response, lighting, - appliances, consumer electronics, electric and gas HVAC and DHW, and behavioural programs. - 1 Mostly recently, my engagement on...
AI summary The testimony supports EfficiencyOne's proposed 2020-2022 DSM Plan, arguing it is affordable, reduces long-term power generation costs, and provides significant customer bill savings. The three-year investment of $129.1 million is projected to generate $494 million in avoided costs and $477 million in customer savings.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Supply Agreement for 7 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities 8 9 Between 10 11 Nova Scotia Power Incorporated 12 13 and 14 EfficiencyOne 15 16 Effective Date – January 1, 2020 1 Table of Contents 2 1. INTERPRETATIO...
AI summary This document outlines a supply agreement between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and EfficiencyOne for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities, effective from January 1, 2020. It includes terms related to interpretation, performance requirements, indemnity, and confidentiality, along with schedules detailing activities, compensation, and approved plans.
1 SCHEDULE A 2 3 ELECTRICITY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 4 Schedule A 5 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities 6 7 The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3 year Cumulative Annual Energy 8 Savings,Cumulativ...
AI summary This document outlines the scope of savings from Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECAs) over a specified term, including cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings. It also references the Performance Targets set out in Schedule E and mentions the regulatory process that could be triggered if targets are not met.
E-3E1 (NSPI) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-69
153 passages
ting various investment levels without regard to considerations such as 25 deliverability, balanced portfolio, short and long term affordability, and related factors 26 considered in the development of an appropriate and deliverable DSM Pl...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) developed three investment scenarios for the DSM 2020-2022 Plan, considering affordability, balanced portfolios, and deliverability. The scenarios included $34M and $27M annual investments, with alignment to the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan's key considerations: maximizing energy savings, balanced portfolios, and appropriate investment levels.
imizing Energy Savings (customer value); 9 • Ensuring a Balanced Portfolio (customer need); and 10 • Establishing an Appropriate Investment Level (customer affordability). 11 The $27M annual investment tables show this level of investment...
AI summary The text evaluates the impact of $27M and $34M annual investments on Energy Savings, highlighting that both fall short of 2019 targets and the 2014 IRP Preferred Resource Plan. A $27M investment yields less than 100 GWh savings annually, while $34M achieves ~118 GWh, still below 2019 goals. Lower investments hinder barrier mitigation and program effectiveness.
N/A N/A Total 34.2 181.4 124.1 1819.6 33.5 2.1 5.3 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2022 a Savings at Demand Savings b Administrator ($ million) ($ million) E...
AI summary The text presents a table with financial and energy metrics, including investment figures, lifetime benefits, annual energy savings, and cost tests (TRC and PAC). It appears to evaluate program performance and resource allocation, focusing on energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms.
N/A N/A Total 27.1 132.4 97.8 1421.9 22.2 2.1 4.9 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2022 a Savings at Demand Savings b Administrator ($ million) ($ million) En...
AI summary The text presents a table with financial and energy data, including investment, benefits, energy savings, and cost tests related to programs. It includes metrics such as lifetime energy savings, annual net demand savings, and program administrator details.
N/A N/A Total 26.8 136.2 94.5 1408.5 21.7 2.1 5.1 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment ($ Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource Year Savings at Demand Savings Administrator million) ($ million)a Energ...
AI summary The text presents a table with columns including Total, Investment, Lifetime Benefits, Annual Net Energy Savings, and Program Administrator, suggesting it is related to energy program metrics and cost evaluations.
Generator (GWh) (MW) 2020 27.1 128.2 99.8 1433.0 22.3 2.0 4.7 2021 27.1 132.4 97.8 1421.9 22.2 2.1 4.9 2022 26.8 136.2 94.5 1408.5 21.7 2.1 5.1 Total 81.0 396.8 292.0 4263.4 66.2 2.1 4.9 aLifetime benefits are expressed as the net present...
AI summary The text provides data on generator output in gigawatt-hours (GWh) and megawatts (MW) for the years 2020 to 2022, including totals. It also defines terms such as 'Lifetime benefits,' 'TRC,' and 'PAC,' which are used to evaluate the net present value of avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios in energy efficiency programs.
5.4 Total 102.1 535.6 354.9 5192.4 103.0 2.1 5.2 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2020 Savings at Demand Savings Administrator ($ million) ($ million)a Energy...
AI summary The text presents financial and energy data, including total investment, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests related to a program. The data includes figures for 2020 and other years, with metrics such as investment in millions, energy savings in GWh, and cost tests.
A N/A Total 33.1 166.9 118.0 1702.9 32.7 2.0 5.0 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2021 a Savings at Demand Savings b Administrator ($ million) ($ million) Ene...
AI summary The document presents a table with financial and energy-related metrics, including investment, benefits, energy savings, and cost tests. It includes columns such as 'Incremental Investment,' 'Lifetime Benefits,' 'Annual Net Energy Savings,' and 'Total Resource Cost Test (TRC).'
A N/A Total 34.2 179.7 118.9 1745.9 34.6 2.1 5.3 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2022 a Savings at Demand Savings b Administrator ($ million) ($ million) Ene...
AI summary The text presents a table with financial and energy-related metrics, including investment, benefits, energy savings, and cost tests. It includes columns such as 'Investment ($ million)', 'Lifetime Benefits ($ million)', 'Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh)', and 'Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)' and 'Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC)' metrics.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Table 1: Historical percentages of lighting energy savings within each ENS program component 2 (2015-2018) Percent of Savings from Lighting Program Program Component 2015 2016 2017 2018 Business Energy Rebates 84% 84% 86...
AI summary The text presents historical data on lighting energy savings from various program components of EfficiencyOne between 2015 and 2018. It also highlights that the data tracking system prior to 2015 did not allow for detailed tracking, and provides information on EfficiencyOne's 2018 spending on lighting, which was $15.71M and accounted for 51% of its total expenditure (excluding Enabling Strategies).
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 d) The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan introduces the following specific program 2 enhancements to further overcome participation barriers: 3 • New service: 4 o Appliance replacement: full-service appliance replacement packa...
AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan introduces several program enhancements to overcome participation barriers, including new services, measures, program components, approaches, and increased financial support for energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia.
enhancements are 28 detailed in Appendix A – Section 4 on a program by program basis and BNI Sector 29 enhancements detailed in Appendix A – Section 5 on a program by program basis. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-14 Page 1 of...
AI summary The document outlines program cost breakdowns for EfficiencyOne's energy efficiency initiatives, including Efficient Product Rebates, Residential programs, and BNI Sector enhancements, with details provided for 2016-2018, 2019, and 2020-2022.
lication pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities. Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Impl...
AI summary The document outlines the filing of an incentive setting methodology related to electricity efficiency and conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act. It includes a report by CLEAResult and an implementation plan by EfficiencyOne, submitted for approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement.
in public documents. The best practices were reviewed by the CLEAResult Subject Matter Expert (SME) team, which has significant experience in program design, delivery and evaluation. The result of the jurisdictional scans, contained in App...
AI summary The CLEAResult SME team reviewed best practices for energy efficiency programs, benchmarking ENS’s incentives and performance. Jurisdictional scans identified considerations for incentive setting, which were integrated into recommendations. The study also analyzed Nova Scotia’s energy market, demographics, and regulatory structure to tailor findings to the local context.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 43 of 206 Data Analysis Phase General Principle Definition Examples Identified Best Practice Capture incentive rates used in benchmark jurisdictions (for new incentives) Develop target budget and cost e...
AI summary This section outlines best practices for the data analysis phase, including capturing incentive rates from benchmark jurisdictions and developing target budgets and cost-effectiveness thresholds.
uorescent technology dominates indoor lighting in the commercial sector with 94 percent of the installed lamp base. The average lamp wattage is 36W, which indicates that the commercial lighting market is close to market transformation from...
AI summary The commercial sector in Nova Scotia has a high penetration of fluorescent lighting, with limited use of efficient technologies like T8 and tubular LEDs. There is significant potential for lighting controls and energy savings through upgrades and maintenance incentives. Commercial buildings also have high space cooling system penetration, primarily direct expansion, and rely heavily on electric heating systems like baseboard heating.
$0.30/kWh (MACE Low Cost) 1.6% $0.1567/kWh $0.35/kWh (MACE High Cost) Massachusetts (National $0.46/kWh 2.94% $0.165-$0.185/kWh Grid) The dollar amounts for these jurisdictions are quoted in US dollars. Table 8: Unit Cost, Energy Savings,...
AI summary Table 8 compares energy efficiency portfolio performance and residential rates across different jurisdictions, showing that Nova Scotia's EfficiencyOne and energy efficiency targets are comparable to others. The 2016-2018 savings targets and budgets for ENS are outlined, with consistent unit costs of $0.25/kWh.
$0.25/kWh 2017 136.5 $34.02 $0.25/kWh 2018 136.3 $34.92 $0.26/kWh Total 405.9 $102.15 $0.25/kWh Table 9: ENS’s Targets and Budgets From a total consumption perspective, ENS’s annual target for 2015 is 1.3 percent of electricity sales for t...
AI summary The document discusses ENS’s energy efficiency targets and budgets, referencing a 2014 study on achievable potential for DSM in Nova Scotia, including annual savings and expenditure figures for 2016–2018.
nditure for 2016, 2017, and 2018 were as follows: Year Annual Savings (GWh) Expenditure ($ million) Unit Cost ($/kWh) 2016 139.9 $50.5 $0.36/kWh 2017 141.7 $50.0 $0.35/kWh 2018 136.2 $52.4 $0.38/kWh Total 417.8 $152.9 $0.37/kWh Table 10: N...
AI summary The table summarizes energy efficiency expenditure and savings from 2016 to 2018, showing annual savings in gigawatt-hours and expenditure in millions of dollars, along with unit costs per kilowatt-hour.
Total 417.8 $152.9 $0.37/kWh Table 10: Nova Scotia Achievable Potential Summary The numbers presented are for the base scenario, where the incentives do not change over time. This suggests that ENS’s current savings targets are almost 100...
AI summary The text discusses ENS's current savings targets being nearly 100% of achievable potential, though the approved budget is only 50-70% of the forecasted required budget. ENS is running its portfolio efficiently and optimizing savings for expenditure. Historical performance is also strong compared to other jurisdictions.
ve levels) to adjust for annual variations in the avoided costs. Deployment of specific programs or measures can take advantage of annual variations, but it is difficult to apply this approach to an entire portfolio. Other jurisdictions, s...
AI summary The text discusses the challenge of adjusting for annual variations in avoided costs and how other jurisdictions, like Oregon, address this by aligning with energy efficiency policy and portfolio savings goals. It also notes that ENS is investigating the recognition of local avoided costs and the consideration of discount and premium zones for electricity conservation.
cognize local avoided costs, and to consider discount and premium zones for electricity conservation. This position will be considered in any incentive methodology recommendations. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Through the most recent program evalu...
AI summary The document discusses the need to consider local avoided costs and discount/premium zones for electricity conservation. It highlights issues with savings attribution in educational initiatives, particularly the Home Energy Reports (HER) program, and notes the use of an average wattage approach for energy savings estimates, which may present challenges in determining lifetime energy savings.
Commercial, institutional and industrial customers are eligible to apply to the Custom Program for measures or projects that do not fit under a prescriptive project stream. Scoping and/or Feasibility studies have to be conducted before the...
AI summary The Custom Program allows commercial, institutional, and industrial customers to apply for energy efficiency measures not covered by standard project streams. Projects require scoping or feasibility studies, and incentives are calculated based on various factors. Interest-free financing is available, and there are specialized components for compressed air and recommissioning services.
payback, and unit cost), up to a maximum of $25,000 per building. Customers can access other programs for the other energy savings opportunities. For commercial and industrial customers planning a new build, a building expansion or a major...
AI summary The ENS program offers financial assistance and support for energy efficiency initiatives in commercial and industrial buildings, including design assistance, incentives for equipment, and access to energy management systems. The program also provides multi-year financing and support for strategic energy management approaches.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 61 of 206 parameter such as $/kWh. Recommendations for an Absolute Limit or a Suggested Boundary/Ceiling should be based on the forecasted pro...
AI summary The text outlines recommended incentive thresholds for various customer categories and program models, including absolute limits and suggested boundaries for program expenditures, based on forecasted program costs and administration expenses.
$0.50/kWh, $1,000,000 $0.25/kWh, $500,000 Incentive Table 14: Basis for Program Budget Incentive Threshold 5. What is the acceptable incentive threshold in terms of cost effectiveness? With respect to cost effectiveness, there may be an ac...
AI summary The text discusses determining an acceptable incentive threshold for program budgets based on cost effectiveness, suggesting the use of a lifetime energy savings approach and recommending the development of a consolidated calculator to assess individual measure thresholds.
d retail prices and the incremental equipment costs because customer contribution caps are rarely reached in the commercial sector programs, so the protection is rarely encountered. 57 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1...
AI summary The text discusses the Custom Program, highlighting that customer contribution caps in commercial sector programs are rarely reached, and outlines CLEAResult's recommendations for current and future activities.
negotiations of financial incentives), the budget impact is always being quantified from both a total financial impact and a unit cost perspective. During the program evaluation process, the energy savings assumptions and NTG ratios are re...
AI summary The Custom Program Retrofit incentive offers flexibility through individually negotiated incentives based on project costs, payback, and energy savings. This approach ensures visibility into financial implications for customers, utilities, and society, allowing ENS to balance perspectives and include feasibility study costs in the final payment.
Continue the current activities of engaging the supply chain and reviewing the project invoices to understand technology savings and pricing. For the Business Energy Rebates program, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of Investigate...
AI summary The text discusses ongoing activities related to the Business Energy Rebates program, including program management, evaluation, and investigations into methods to understand program participant operating hours. It also mentions the implementation of recommendations from a General report.
e should update these numbers internally with the information provided from ongoing program management activities, as the estimated 2016 retail prices for the measures will be more accurate. 2016 Cost to Consumer Cost to Current 2014 Estim...
AI summary The text outlines updated retail prices and incentives for ENERGY STAR® LED lamps and specialty lamps in 2016, reflecting program management activities and estimated cost savings for consumers.
25% Lamp ENERGY STAR® LED $30.00 $7.00 $20.50 $25.00 $20.00 $20.50 Yes 20% Specialty Lamp ENERGY STAR® LED $45.00 $20.20 $44.30 $45.00 $33.00 $44.30 Yes 27% Recessed Downlight Not Not Not ENERGY STAR® LED Included Included Included $45.00...
AI summary The text presents a table listing various energy-efficient products along with their costs, including prices for ENERGY STAR® LED lamps, recessed downlights, dimmer switches, motion sensors, power bars, and timers. The table includes details such as manufacturer's suggested retail price, program administrator cost, total resource cost, and rebate amounts.
e suitable. The only three measures that breach the program budget incentive level threshold are the ENERGY STAR specialty lamp, ENERGY STAR recessed downlight and the dimmer switch. The current incentive for the ENERGY STAR specialty lamp...
AI summary The text discusses three measures that exceed the program budget incentive level threshold: ENERGY STAR specialty lamp, ENERGY STAR recessed downlight, and dimmer switches. It outlines the current incentives and the necessary reductions to align with the threshold, while noting a program budget expenditure limit of $0.26/kWh.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 94 of 206 CUSTOM PROGRAM FINANCIAL SIMULATION For the Custom Program Retrofit track, the program financial simulation analysis included the fol...
AI summary This section outlines the steps taken in the financial simulation analysis for the Custom Program Retrofit track, including identifying project parameters, determining incentive level thresholds, and comparing current incentives to these thresholds. EfficiencyOne provided the parameters, and CLEAResult can only comment on average project incentives.
, so that parameter can be analyzed as well. 78 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 95 of 206 Program Budget Incentive Level Threshold As discussed in the Financial Impact Analysi...
AI summary The document discusses the Program Budget Incentive Level Threshold for the Custom Project Retrofit Track, referencing a $25,475 threshold compared to a $24,106 current program budget incentive. It also mentions the use of $/kWh and total incentive for program budget thresholds, with specific values from the 2016 Custom Program.
5 $24,106 Table 29: Program Budget Incentive Level Threshold for Average Project in Custom Retrofit Cost Effectiveness Incentive Level Threshold EfficiencyOne has a PAC target of 4.9 for this program. For the calculation, it is assumed tha...
AI summary This text discusses the Program Budget Incentive Level Threshold for Custom Retrofit Projects, including the EfficiencyOne Program Administrator Cost (PAC) target of 4.9. It outlines how program administration costs are assumed to be 40% of total expenditure, with 60% allocated to incentives. The cost effectiveness threshold varies based on energy savings persistence, with higher persistence leading to higher thresholds.
re different than the project costs, and play more of a factor in equipment replacement decisions, versus new purchase, The program budget incentive level threshold is not exceeded. Finally, for projects where the energy savings persistenc...
AI summary The text discusses considerations for adjusting energy program incentives based on energy savings persistence and project costs. It also includes jurisdictional scans comparing Nova Scotia and Ontario in terms of peak load, population served, and electricity generation sources.
ency Maine) 1,863 MW 1.33 million Gas, Coal, Petroleum-Fired Massachusetts (National Grid) 13,128 MW ≈1.1 million Natural Gas, Nuclear Peak for all of state Table 32: Jurisdiction Overview Current Annual Annual Unit Cost Target per Residen...
AI summary The table provides an overview of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia and Ontario, including annual savings targets, budgets, and incentive percentages. Nova Scotia's program (ENS) has a target of 135.3 GWh with a budget of $34.05 million and a 70% incentive rate. Ontario's program has a larger target of 1,450 GWh with a budget of $366.67 million.
$51.05 N/A $0.24/m3 $0.1069/m3 (Cumulative Cubic Meters) British Columbia (BC $0.10- 2007-2020 884 GWh N/A N/A N/A N/A Hydro) $0.12/kWh 2016+ Rolling $0.1625/kW California (PG&E) 593 GWh $365.1M 81% $0.43/kWh 1% Portfolio h $0.1109- Energy...
AI summary The document includes a table with data on energy-related figures, such as costs and volumes, and mentions British Columbia Hydro, California (PG&E), and the Energy Trust of Oregon. It also includes a statement about changing the way people use energy and a filing date of March 29, 2019, with a reference to NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 99 of 206 Current Annual Annual Unit Cost Target per Residential Jurisdiction Framework Savings Budget ($ % Incentive of Savings Retail Retail...
AI summary The text presents energy efficiency program data, including savings targets, budgets, and unit costs from various jurisdictions such as the Energy Trust of Oregon and New York (ConEd), with references to EEPS and EEPS II programs.
Average (EEPS II) (EEPS II) Average New York $0.2005/kW ≈1% (NYSERDA) h $0.125- Vermont 2015-2017 107.27 GWh $43.43 55% $0.40/kWh 2% $0.195/kWh
AI summary The text presents average energy efficiency program performance metrics, including data from New York and Vermont, highlighting key figures such as energy savings, costs, and efficiency rates.
MACE High 54,057.3 Dth Cost) High Cost) (Base) $9.79/Dth $0.529 (Gas 118,016 Dth Base) (Base) (MACE) $10.00/Dth $1.18 (Gas Average MACE) (MACE) Average Massachusetts/ $0.165- 2016-2018 646.33 $299.20 80% $0.46/kWh 2.94% National Grid $0.18...
AI summary The document includes a table with energy cost data and savings targets from 2016-2018, including details on gas and electricity prices, savings percentages, and average costs. It also references an appendix about Ontario electricity and is part of a larger regulatory proceeding.
range in size. The two largest LDCs are Toronto Hydro and Hydro One, both with over 500,000 customers. In comparison, Atikokan Hydro, one of the smallest LDCs, has just over 1,600 customers. Electricity Generation Ontario is a summer peaki...
AI summary The text discusses the size of LDCs in Ontario, highlighting Toronto Hydro and Hydro One as the largest with over 500,000 customers, and Atikokan Hydro as one of the smallest with just over 1,600 customers. It also outlines Ontario's electricity generation, consumption by sector, and the history of energy efficiency programs in the province.
Kilowatt Counts”), an appliance retirement program (“The Great Refrigerator Round up”) and a business incentive program delivered through multiple partners (“ERIP”, “BOMA”, “MEER”). Cost Effectiveness Testing In their conservation (CDM) pl...
AI summary The text discusses cost effectiveness testing for conservation programs, including the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC), with specific exceptions for low-income programs. It also outlines avoided costs for electricity, such as avoided capacity and energy costs, and includes a 15% adder for societal benefits. The IESO is highlighted as responsible for maintaining cost effectiveness across programs.
chment 1 Page 107 of 206 participants; and analyzing what future impacts would be on uptake, the budget and cost effectiveness based on current and future participation trends. ONTARIO CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Curr...
AI summary The text discusses Ontario's conservation programs, which cover various sectors and include financial incentives, coaching, assessments, and training initiatives. Ontario has conducted rigorous evaluations of its programs, leading to higher energy efficiency baselines. A new pay-for-performance framework for LDC funding of Conservation Program delivery was recently released.
ial performance track provides $500 or $1,000 per New Business home for obtaining the appropriate Energuide Construction rating. Incentives were set based on attracting builder to consider program for additional electricity efficiency meas...
AI summary The document outlines incentive programs for energy efficiency in new and retrofit construction, offering financial support to businesses based on Energuide ratings and upfront costs. These programs aim to encourage the adoption of energy-efficient measures in commercial and industrial sectors.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 109 of 206 This program provides funding for hiring an Energy Manager for larger commercial or industrial customers. https://saveonen The incen...
AI summary This program offers funding for hiring Energy Managers by larger commercial or industrial customers, with options for guaranteed salary or pay for performance based on realized energy savings. The pay for performance option is set at $40/MWh, and annual savings targets are provided to ensure program cost-effectiveness.
Systems.aspx 93 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 110 of 206 APPENDIX A-2: ONTARIO GAS (UNION GAS) The incentive setting methodology and cost effectiveness section was based on...
AI summary This document discusses Ontario Gas, specifically Union Gas and Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., their customer base, and load and consumption information for 2014, including the number of customers and sales data categorized by rate classes.
and for assessing the appropriateness DSM plans for 2015-2020. The framework can also be used in gas utilities’ proposal reviews/approvals for their DSM plans by the OEB. Guiding principles include: 1. Invest in DSM where the cost is equal...
AI summary The document outlines guiding principles for assessing DSM plans, emphasizing cost-effectiveness, customer participation, and integration with other energy efficiency efforts. It also mentions the submission of annual budgets, eligibility criteria, and studies for OEB approval, including a mid-term review in 2018 to assess performance and impact on customer rates and shareholder incentives.
luding financial, marketing and communications, administration and staffing requirements and program evaluation. The OEB has approved annual DSM budgets for the 2015-2020 with modifications: Figure 19: Gas Program Budgets 4 Figure 20: Gas...
AI summary The document discusses the approval of annual DSM budgets by the OEB for 2015-2020, including financial and program evaluation aspects. Gas utilities have set targets and performance metrics, using a weighted scorecard approach that emphasizes lifetime natural gas savings. Union Gas also proposed specific metrics targeting various programs and participant categories.
Technical Reference Manual The EC reviews and proposes updates to the OEB with regards to data within the TRM. This occurs yearly. This review and update includes input assumptions to reflect the findings of the annual DSM evaluation and a...
AI summary The document discusses the Technical Reference Manual (TRM) reviewed annually by the Energy Commission (EC) for updates, including input from annual DSM evaluations. It outlines cost-effectiveness requirements for gas utilities, noting different thresholds for low-income programs versus Resource Acquisition programs. Avoided supply costs and benefits under the TRC-plus test are also detailed, including non-energy benefits.
me-reno - Water Heater: $200 - Window: $40 per window https://www.uni ongas.com/busi ness/save- money-and- Resource energy/space- Acquisition heating- programs https://www.uni Program provides customers rebates for ongas.com/busi a list of...
AI summary The document outlines a program that provides rebates to customers for the installation of efficient technologies and equipment, including examples such as water heaters and windows, with links to additional information.
INCENTIVE LEVEL-SETTING METHODOLOGY The following is a rough sketch of what we have seen in other territories. BC Hydro is responsible for setting incentive levels for their programs and introducing new measures and programs. This is perfo...
AI summary This text outlines BC Hydro's methodology for setting incentive levels for energy efficiency programs. It includes benchmarking against other jurisdictions, market research, use of technical reference manuals, and incremental cost design to determine appropriate incentives for customers.
Community Energy & Emissions Plan (CEEP): Intended for improved energy management and it can be used to foster green economic development in the community Community Energy Manager (CEM): Funding for a dedicated staff resource within lo...
AI summary The text outlines several initiatives under the Sustainable Communities Program, including the Community Energy & Emissions Plan, Community Energy Manager, Local Area Plan, and Project Implementation Pilot. These initiatives aim to improve energy management, reduce emissions, and promote sustainable development. A Business Energy Advisor will also engage with businesses to identify energy-saving opportunities.
Commercial 15.62 Industrial 12.34 Table 34: Average Retail Rates California - 2014 CALIFORNIA ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE & COST EFFECTIVENESS POLICY California has long been recognized as one of the leading jurisdiction in North A...
AI summary The text discusses California's energy efficiency programs and the regulatory framework established by the CPUC, including the implementation of a 'Rolling Target' system for setting annual budgets and long-term forecasts. The CPUC requires IOUs to submit annual budgets and business plans every five years. The text also mentions a commitment to fund approximately $1B in ratepayer funds for energy efficiency and conservation programs.
combustion turbine Ancillary Services Percentage of Generation Energy value Directly linked with energy shape Marginal transmission and distribution costs T&D Capacity Hourly temperature data from utility ratemaking filings Directly linked...
AI summary This text discusses the components of avoided costs in the California electricity sector, including the cost of marginal renewable resources and the use of carbon forecasts in integrated resource plans. It references a decision from the California Public Utilities Commission and a report from Energy and Environmental Economics.
2014 2015 Goal Achieved Table 36: PG&E 2013-2015 Gross Energy Savings PG&E 2013-2015 Demand Savings: Goals vs. Achieved. 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 - 2013 2014 2015 Goal Achieved Table 37: PG&E 2013...
AI summary The document presents PG&E's energy efficiency performance from 2013 to 2015, including gross energy savings, demand savings, and budget spending. PG&E achieved $1.53B in actual expenditures against a $1.68B budget, exceeding its targets.
PG&E 2013-2015 Incentive-to-Administrative Spending Ratios 2013 2014 2015 TRC 1.33 1.38 N/A PAC 2.36 2.18 N/A 120 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 137 of 206 FUTURE TARGETS Bel...
AI summary The document outlines PG&E's incentive-to-administrative spending ratios for the years 2013 to 2015 and discusses the formation of PG&E’s Energy Efficiency Products organization to standardize and streamline energy efficiency measures. It also references future energy efficiency targets submitted to the CPUC.
, goals were limited by funding and not by opportunity. Achieving this higher level of performance required a focused effort to diversify and refine Energy Trust programs, generate faster feedback from participants on program effectiveness...
AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon increased its energy efficiency expenditures from $63 million in 2008 to $117 million in 2013, emphasizing the need for diversified programs, faster feedback, and tailored strategies. The Northwest Power & Conservation Council highlights energy efficiency as the least-cost resource, critical for meeting capacity needs and mitigating financial and carbon risks.
e Energy Trust in its Annual Budget and Action Plans referred to below. 2013 2014 2015 2016 Electricity Efficiency $125,804,504 $130,262,893 $130,359,188 $141,288,266 Gas Efficiency $28,471,175 $28,946,948 $23,316,785 $26,347,507 Total $15...
AI summary The text presents financial and efficiency data for the Energy Trust, including annual budgets and savings from electricity and gas efficiency programs from 2013 to 2016. It includes links to strategic plans and reports, as well as statistics on energy savings.
d uncertainty. Avoided costs based on integrated resource planning will be provided to the Energy Trust by utilities. The utility system test will include items 1, 3, 4 and 5 above. 14 https://energytrust.org/library/policies/4.06.000.pdf...
AI summary The text discusses avoided costs in utility planning, including the inclusion of forecasted reduced carbon dioxide emissions and the consideration of other environmental pollutant costs as per OPUC guidance. It also mentions the application of societal tests and specific measure evaluations by the Energy Trust.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 149 of 206 COST EFFECTIVENESS – NATURAL GAS The current market condition for natural gas prices (i.e., low price environment) has caused the En...
AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon uses a Total Resource Cost (TRC) guideline to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of natural gas efficiency measures. Measures with a TRC of 1.0 or higher are prioritized, while those with lower TRC values may be exceptions or excluded unless justified. This approach helps maintain program infrastructure and momentum until gas prices rise.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 151 of 206 Overall, it was commented that the process of setting incentives is “more of an art than a science” and determining the ideal incent...
AI summary The text discusses the challenge of setting energy efficiency incentives, noting that it is more of an art than a science. It mentions the Energy Trust's guidelines for maximum LUEC and annual performance measures set by commissions, including specific targets for utilities in Oregon.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 158 of 206 Figure 42: Overall Targets 2007 - 20158 Figure 43: Electric Program Budgets9 Small Residential Multi- C&I C&I Residential Program Business Appliance Room Air Residential Residential family Custom...
AI summary The text presents figures related to electric program budgets from 2009 to 2011, including various categories such as C&I Custom Efficiency, Residential Direct Install, and Multi-family Energy Efficiency. Specific monetary amounts are listed for different years, indicating program spending.
$10,544,823 $16,589,934 $10,660,000 $3,832,285 $5,659,857 $2,593,500 N/A 2011 2012 $4,519,285 $5,564,562 $2,739,807 $5,907,497 2013 $29,365,716 $144,919,976 $111,567,548 $29,493,216 2014 $17,741,736 Three programs combined into Discontinue...
AI summary The text presents financial figures and program details, including gas program budgets and electric savings results, with references to energy efficiency studies and regulatory documents related to energy programs in New York.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 160 of 206 The costs calculated in the TRC are costs paid by the program administrators and participants plus the increase in supply costs for...
AI summary The text presents a table showing the costs calculated in the TRC, which include costs paid by program administrators and participants, as well as the increase in supply costs due to load increases. It lists various programs and their associated energy efficiency targets from 2009 to 2015.
gas for HVAC and VFD projects, whichever is less. TRC test is required and the benefit must be greater than costs. Commercial All C&I custom measures incented at $0.16 per kWh. Additional bonus incentives on super-efficient chillers. Gas i...
AI summary The document outlines various incentive programs for commercial and industrial customers to upgrade energy-efficient equipment and conduct energy studies. Incentives include performance-based rewards, gas and electric rebates, and funding for energy efficiency studies. The Total Resource Cost (TRC) test is a requirement for eligibility, ensuring that the benefits of the measures exceed their costs.
he following are the retail prices for Con Edison customers in 2014: Residential: $0.2885/kWh Commercial: $0.2216/kWh Industrial: $0.2018/kWh NYSERDA ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS POLICY Cost Effectivenes...
AI summary The text provides retail electricity prices for Con Edison customers in 2014 and discusses NYSERDA's energy efficiency programs under the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS). It outlines cost-effectiveness testing using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and the calculation of avoided supply costs provided by the NY-ISO. Energy efficiency programs are funded over three-year cycles and cover residential and commercial sectors.
VERMONT ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS POLICY Vermont is viewed as one of the leading jurisdictions for promoting conservation in North America. Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) has won multiple awar...
AI summary Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) leads energy efficiency efforts in Vermont, setting three-year energy savings and budget targets negotiated with the Public Services Board (PSB). The current cycle (2015-2017) aims for 321,800 MWh of savings annually, with performance tied to payments through an EM&V process. Targets are determined via a 20-year Demand Resource Plan (DRP) process.
Every three year cycle is determined through a Demand Resource Plan (DRP) process that has a 20 year horizon. This process sets the three year energy conservation savings and budget targets. According to the latest update to the 2015-2017...
AI summary The Demand Resource Plan (DRP) sets three-year energy conservation savings and budget targets over a 20-year horizon. Efficiency Vermont's resource acquisition budgets for 2015–2017 are outlined, with annual figures of $42.35M, $39.46M, and $45.56M. The Public Services Board (PSB) verifies annual savings to ensure alignment with the initial plan.
for developing, planning, coordinating and implementing energy efficiency and alternative energy resource programs in the entire state; this includes electric and gas fuel programs. LOAD AND CONSUMPTION INFORMATION (ELECTRIC) Electricity i...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency and alternative energy programs in Maine, including electricity distribution by ISO New England and Northern Maine Independent System Operator, along with customer account numbers and electricity rates for residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 185 of 206 the state’s electric utilities to collect the applicable budget from their customers and remit it to the Trust for its programs. An...
AI summary The text discusses the funding and evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Maine, emphasizing that energy efficiency is the lowest-cost energy resource. It mentions the role of the MPUC in approving budgets and the use of various funding sources, including ratepayer contributions and market revenues.
Costs of running the energy efficiency programs (delivery and administration costs) TRC at the Measure level: Costs incurred from the measure (incremental costs) PACT at the Program Level: Costs incurred from the measure (incremental...
AI summary The text outlines the costs associated with energy efficiency programs, distinguishing between TRC at the Measure level and PACT at both Program and Measure levels. It includes incremental costs, delivery and administration costs, and incentive costs. The document also references benefit-cost ratios for electric and natural gas programs from 2015.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 191 of 206 Figure 61: Benefit- Cost Ratios: All Fuels and Natural Gas Programs 2015 12
AI summary The document presents Figure 61, which illustrates benefit-cost ratios for all fuels and natural gas programs in 2015. This figure is part of an attachment to NS Power's IR-15 filing.
Commercial Heat Pump For businesses that are looking to Ductless heat pumps: $500 to $1,250 Program upgrade their heating and cooling system with highly efficient products. http://www.efficiencymaine.com/at- work/commercial-heat-pump-progr...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency programs in Maine, including the Commercial Heat Pump Program, Large Customer Program, and Advanced Building Program, each offering financial incentives for businesses and property owners to upgrade to efficient heating and cooling systems and achieve significant energy savings.
National Grid is an investor owned utility that operates in the United Kingdom, and in parts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New York in the United States. National Grid provides both electricity and natural gas to customers across thes...
AI summary National Grid is an investor-owned utility operating in the UK and parts of the US, providing electricity and natural gas services. It collaborates with other utilities to submit multi-year energy efficiency plans to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities. Mass Save is a public-facing initiative for energy efficiency programs in Massachusetts, supported by various utilities and service providers.
enerated comes from large scale generators and CHP units, while the rest comes from electric utilities. The majority of generators participate in ISO-New England’s capacity market. MASSACHUSETTS ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST...
AI summary Massachusetts leads in energy efficiency, with utilities required to prioritize cost-effective programs under the Green Communities Act. The state's 2016-2018 plan targets 4,122 GWh of savings, funded by sources like the Systems Benefit Charge, Forward Capacity Market, and cap and trade programs. 10% of the budget must support low-income initiatives.
5. Energy Efficiency Surcharge (if required and approved by DPU) For electricity efficiency programs, 10 percent of the total budget should be dedicated to the low income sector. 100 http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=MA#tabs-4 101 http://web1....
AI summary The text discusses the allocation of 10% of the total budget for electricity efficiency programs to support the low-income sector and outlines the cost-effectiveness testing requirements for programs, including the use of the TRC test, minimizing administration costs, and using competitive procurement processes.
s) costs should be minimized to the fullest practicable extent 3. Program administrators will use competitive procurement processes to the fullest practicable extent Avoided Costs Periodically, the avoided costs are updated. The last updat...
AI summary The text discusses the minimization of costs through competitive procurement processes and the periodic updating of avoided costs, last updated in 2015 based on a Synapse Energy Economics report. It outlines major categories of benefit for electricity, including avoided capacity and energy costs, transmission and distribution costs, and various DRIPE categories. It also provides an overview of National Grid's service area and customer classes.
Expenditure ($) Residential 805,157 $290,842,401 $222,323,354 Low Income 58,040 $85,604,742 $68,824,752 Commercial & Industrial 919,015 $300,079,268 $247,234,173 National Grid 2013-2015 Incentive to Total Program Spending and Spending per...
AI summary The text presents expenditure data for residential, low-income, and commercial & industrial sectors, along with incentive ratios and cost effectiveness for National Grid's programs from 2013-2015. It also outlines future energy savings targets and budgets for 2016-2018, including National Grid's specific goals and the overall target as a percentage of retail electricity sales.
Massachusetts.106 National Grid’s individual target and budget for 2016-2018 is 1,939 GWh and $897.6 million. The overall target is 2.94 percent of retail electricity sales. 104 Data from Masssavedata.com 105 2013-2015 Plan: http://www.mas...
AI summary The document outlines National Grid's 2016-2018 energy efficiency targets and budget, as well as its incentive level setting methodology, which includes customer market research, technology research, and stakeholder discussions. It also lists core program offerings for residential and business sectors.
ling Income thermostat ( up to $100) and programmable thermostats (up to $25)
AI summary The text mentions income-related rebates for thermostats, including up to $100 for standard thermostats and up to $25 for programmable thermostats.
Incentives are provided for the installation of qualifying energy management systems and vending miser controls For customers with a demand under 300 kW, offer http://www.mass a free audit for identifying energy savings save.com/en/bu...
AI summary The document outlines incentives for energy efficiency measures in commercial and small business settings, including free audits, financial support for retrofits, and financing options for energy management systems and equipment.
ustom measures r Renovation and siness/incentive- Commercial and sustainable office design. Incentives are Replacing Failed programs/new- provided on a prescriptive, quasi-prescriptive or Equipment construction- performance basis. Program...
AI summary The text outlines a commercial incentive program for replacing failed equipment and implementing sustainable office design, offering up to 75% of the incremental cost for installed equipment and $1.00/sqft for energy-efficient lighting and control systems in leased spaces.
wner or operator of residential building with 5 or more units. An energy assessment is offered that energy savings opportunities for the http://www.mass building envelope, as well as lighting and save.com/en/bu Multi-Family mechanical syst...
AI summary The document describes a program offering energy assessments and incentives for multi-family and commercial buildings, encouraging the use of the EPA’s Portfolio Manager tool for benchmarking performance.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 206 of 206 Outputs Total Gross Energy Savings; Total Gross Demand Reduction; Total Net Energy Savings; Total Net Demand Reduction; TR...
AI summary The text outlines key outputs and inputs for reviewing incentive protocols in energy efficiency programs. Outputs include energy savings, demand reduction, TRC and PAC metrics, and cost calculations. Inputs involve cost thresholds, program delivery channels, and financial considerations for setting review guidelines.
often reported the “Existing Measures” and “Inputs & Calcs” tabs were the most time consuming because they had to search for information their program components did not track. All five staff members reported the current incentive setting...
AI summary Staff members found the 'Existing Measures' and 'Inputs & Calcs' tabs in the Workbook time-consuming due to the need to search for untracked information. The current incentive setting process is more time-intensive than previous methods, increasing workload burdens and concerns about scaling up.
f 94 4.3. Complete an Electronic Technical Reference Manual Objective Verify that ENS has completed its electronic TRM. ENS completed its eTRM on September 30, 2017. The purpose of the eTRM is to “centrally organize and administer characte...
AI summary ENS has completed its electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM) and integrated it into the Dynamic Demand Side Management System. Additionally, ENS developed a Consolidated Calculator to assist in setting incentive levels, though some program staff found it challenging to locate required inputs.
llects data to more effectively capture that information? Q9. Now let’s move on to the “Inputs and Calcs” tab. What was most challenging on that tab? 1. What, if anything, might make it easier for you to provide the information that tab wa...
AI summary The text includes questions about challenges in completing the 'Inputs and Calcs' tab of a workbook, the potential for improvement in data collection, and the factors influencing decisions on incentive levels for energy efficiency programs.
ce respondents represented close to half of the Retrofit service projects, and more than half of the service’s savings and incentives paid from January through September, 2017 (Table 3). Table 3: Comparison of Retrofit Service Population (...
AI summary The text discusses the Retrofit service projects and BER program participation, noting that respondents represented nearly half of the projects and over half of the savings and incentives paid from January to September 2017. Only three out of 12 BER participants completed interviews.
ly for the BD evaluation. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 35 of 94 3. Findings This chapter is based upon the results of our interviews with BDMs, other key ENS staff, consultants, and participants in BNI progra...
AI summary The chapter evaluates the effectiveness of internal collaboration at ENS, particularly between BDMs and program staff. BDMs are instrumental in identifying appropriate energy-efficiency programs and connecting customers with ENS staff, facilitating the approval and implementation of energy-saving projects.
an interest in future projects stated that they had a small facility and their recent completed Retrofit service project addressed their one major energy using piece of equipment. As further evidence that ENS is responding to the market, C...
AI summary The document discusses ENS's efforts to expand its Custom program component by targeting specific market niches and developing specialists in areas like refrigeration and industrial applications. It also highlights the need for better participation pathways for businesses that are too large for SBES but too small for Custom programs due to the cost of feasibility studies.
feasibility study. According to these respondents, any financial advantage of participating in the Custom program component is eroded by the cost of completing this study. 3.3. Effectiveness of the Sales Process To understand if improvemen...
AI summary Respondents indicate that the cost of conducting a feasibility study erodes the financial benefits of the Custom program component. The sales process effectiveness is discussed, with BDMs and consultants working closely on program projects, including feasibility studies and M&V plans.
Q10. [If they work with BDMs] Do you ever work with BDMs and consultant to discuss technical aspects of a project you are interested in? How does that typically occur? Q11. [If they work with BDMs] Overall, how satisfied are you with your...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions about interactions with BDMs, ENS, and service providers in the context of energy-saving projects and BER incentives. It seeks feedback on satisfaction, communication, and support received, as well as suggestions for improvement.
paperwork? Did the service provider interact directly with ENS staff? Q19. Overall, how satisfied were you with the following aspects of your service provider? 1) The service you received throughout the process 2) [IF APPLICABLE] The infor...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer satisfaction with service providers, additional energy-saving projects, and the BER program. It also asks about future plans and challenges with the BER program, as well as suggestions for improving its effectiveness.
. Costs include both direct incentives (cheques to participants) and the cost to remove and replace appliances 3 4 g) Yes, enhancements have been included in the Alternate Scenario. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-21 Page 3 of...
AI summary The document discusses the costs associated with EfficiencyOne's program, including direct incentives and appliance replacement. It references an application by E1 for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for efficiency and conservation activities from 2020 to 2022, under matter number M09096.
fits exceeding total costs by a ratio of almost five to one. By 2030, the present value of benefits and costs from the Amendment is estimated to be $5.75 billion and $1.20 billion, respectively. For all product categories affected by the A...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to generate significant energy savings and reduce GHG emissions, with benefits far exceeding costs. The analysis shows that energy savings over the product lifecycle will offset any increased retail prices, with payback periods of less than eight years for all product categories. The document provides a detailed cost-benefit analysis.
roduct category, the potential cost of modifying the benchmark product model so that it meets the more stringent MEPS was estimated (e.g. cost of adding extra insulation to a water heater; cost of http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/201810...
AI summary The text discusses the estimated costs of modifying products to meet more stringent MEPS, including manufacturing, compliance, and administrative costs. It also mentions additional costs related to installation, maintenance, and product lifetime, as well as government implementation costs.
applicable. Total costs reported as being attributable to the Amendment include manufacturing, compliance and administrative costs as well as those incurred by Government to implement the changes. Methodology to estimate benefits Energy sa...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for estimating the benefits of an amendment, focusing on energy savings and cost calculations. Energy savings are calculated by comparing the energy use of benchmark product models with modified versions meeting stricter MEPS. These savings are monetized by multiplying by the cost of energy per unit saved.
ns were monetized and incorporated into the analysis using a social cost of carbon, as calculated by Environment and Climate Change Canada. Assumptions Key assumptions include the following: Businessasusual case reflects Canadian market...
AI summary The analysis assumes a business-as-usual scenario based on 2016 Canadian market conditions and uses a social cost of carbon calculated by Environment and Climate Change Canada. It estimates benefits and costs in real constant 2015 dollars with a 3% discount rate. The valuation of GHG emissions and incremental costs for efficient technology are key factors, with the latter assumed constant despite potential cost reductions over time.
ication — costs and alternative scheme for battery chargers A number of stakeholders including three industry associations inquired or raised concerns over verification and its associated costs. Canada’s compliance approach differs from th...
AI summary Stakeholders raised concerns about verification costs for battery chargers. Natural Resources Canada requires certification by accredited bodies for compliance, ensuring fairness and credibility. An alternative verification scheme was introduced to make the process more efficient for low-cost, high-volume products like battery chargers.
Indicators performance GHG emissions are reduced to contribute to Canada’s goal to reduce GHG Percentage of product models Energy efficiency reports emissions by at least 30% below 2005 levels by 2030 that meet MEPS Import reports Consumer...
AI summary The text outlines performance indicators related to GHG emissions reduction, energy efficiency, and cost savings from using efficient products. It emphasizes monitoring through compliance reporting, third-party verification, and market data collection to assess outcomes.
2030. The quantified costs include incremental technology costs to meet the more stringent standards, administrative costs and costs to Government associated with regulatory implementation. While not quantified as part of this analysis, en...
AI summary The text discusses the quantified costs of implementing more stringent energy efficiency standards, including technology, administrative, and regulatory costs. It also highlights economic and non-energy benefits, such as increased productivity and household comfort. The amendment is classified as an 'IN' under the 'One-for-One' Rule and impacts small Canadian manufacturers. The amendment resulted from domestic and international cooperation to meet GHG and energy consumption goals.
s estimated that, by applying a social cost of carbon to these reductions, the cumulative present value of economic benefits associated with GHG emission reductions will be $701 million by 2030. 12 Canadian consumers will also realize econ...
AI summary The document estimates that the Amendment will yield $701 million in economic benefits from GHG emission reductions by 2030, with over $2 billion in energy savings. The cumulative present value of net benefits is projected to be $1.80 billion by 2030, with total benefits exceeding costs by more than two to one.
ns. Policy case The policy case is defined as the application of the more stringent MEPS across 11 product categories relative to markets defined by studies completed in 2016. Benchmarks For all product categories, benchmarks are chosen to...
AI summary The policy case involves applying more stringent MEPS across 11 product categories based on 2016 studies. Benchmarks are set for products not meeting these standards, with efficiency levels weighted by market share. The social cost of carbon is used to quantify GHG emission reduction benefits, using estimates from Environment and Climate Change Canada and aligning with U.S. methodologies.
estimate social cost of carbon values at $37.4/tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2013 (in 2012$), increasing each year with the expected growth in damages. Methodology to estimate costs The additional or “incremental” costs associated...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology for estimating the incremental costs of an Amendment, focusing on the difference between inefficient and more energy-efficient product models. It outlines how costs are calculated based on modifications to meet MEPS, multiplied by the number of shipments of inefficient models, and includes manufacturing, compliance, and administrative costs, excluding testing and verification costs.
arking is not included either because they are confidential business costs that vary based on business relationships. 16 However, they are estimated to be less than 10% of the total testing costs. http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/201...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology used to estimate energy savings from implementing more stringent MEPS. Energy savings for each product category were calculated by comparing the energy usage of benchmark models with modified versions that meet the new standards. The results were monetized by multiplying energy savings by the cost of energy per unit.
its. A 2018 study 20 found that each doubling of production for residential gas furnaces lead to a 5.7% to 8.9% decrease in manufacturing costs. Data collection and sources Data is collected on a productbyproduct basis, through market st...
AI summary The text discusses a 2018 study on the relationship between production volume and manufacturing costs for residential gas furnaces, as well as data collection methods for assessing the impact of MEPS amendments. The study found that increased production leads to lower costs, and data is collected on a product-by-product basis for market analysis.
$0.00 $29.63 $29.63 Commercial gasfired water heaters $29.42 $47.23 $17.81 Commercial gasfired storage water heater $15.01 $42.01 $27.00 Residentialduty commercial gasfired storage water heater $5.53 $1.53 $4.00 Commercial gasfired i...
AI summary The table presents costs for various water heaters and furnaces, along with benefits from energy savings and GHG emission reductions. It notes that numbers may not add up due to rounding and covers shipments impacted by proposed regulations between 2019 and 2030. All figures are discounted to the year 2018.
Covers shipments impacted by the proposed Regulations between 2019 and 2030. All benefits and costs are discounted at 3% to the year 2018. Table 3: Summary of benefits and costs to Canadians Aggregate Total Cumulative Annual Totals Present...
AI summary The text discusses the economic impacts of proposed regulations from 2019 to 2030, including benefits such as fuel savings and avoided GHG damages, and costs related to technology, installation, and compliance. All values are discounted to 2018 prices.
would allow for a more precise stakeholder estimate and decided, for the purpose of this calculation, to apply estimates of incremental burden to all 710 stakeholders. Submitting import reports The Amendment would introduce import reportin...
AI summary The text discusses the administrative burden on importers due to new import reporting requirements for energy-using products, estimating the number of importers affected and the time and cost associated with completing these reports.
he burden on the affected industries, primarily through the use of existing testing standards used by the industry or required by other jurisdictions to assess conformity with the proposed MEPS. Prescribed MEPS are a proven costeffective...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation and enforcement of energy efficiency regulations, emphasizing the use of Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) to reduce GHG emissions and energy consumption. It outlines compliance procedures, third-party verification, and the role of Natural Resources Canada in ensuring adherence to these standards.
Lab testing commercial building floor space. Emission factors Businesses using regulated energyusing products save money that can lead to Energy prices increased productivity and competitiveness. Performance will be monitored through a co...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency regulations, focusing on compliance monitoring, emission factors, and the role of lab testing and third-party verification. It outlines methods for tracking performance and the impact of energy consumption on both GHG emissions and consumer savings. The standards are part of a federal program, and progress is reported in various official documents.
urer engages in with the certification body, e.g. safety certification, energy efficiency verification, as well as the number of products and models the manufacturer has. 17 Marginal fuels represent the last power plant that is needed to m...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency verification processes, marginal fuel costs and emissions, discount rates aligned with the Pan-Canadian Framework, and references to studies and regulations related to appliance energy efficiency standards in Canada.
ption associated with the Amendment are estimated to be 0.4 petajoules (PJ) in 2020, and to reach 3.57 PJ in 2030 as the sale of more efficient equipment steadily replaces the preregulation stock. Annual reductions in GHG emissions result...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to result in significant energy savings and GHG emission reductions, with estimated benefits exceeding costs by a ratio of more than three to one by 2030. The cumulative present value of net benefits is estimated at $818 million by 2030.
imate social cost of carbon values at $46.84/tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2018 (in 2018$), increasing each year with the expected growth in damages. 17 Methodology to estimate costs The additional or “incremental” costs associated...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology for estimating the incremental costs and benefits associated with an Amendment, focusing on the difference between inefficient and modified product models meeting new MEPS standards, and the inclusion of various cost components while excluding certain compliance and verification costs.
ct categories to arrive at the estimate of total energy saved. This was then monetized by multiplying the results by the cost of energy per unit of energy saved (i.e. dollars per kilowatt hour). The reductions in GHG emissions were calcula...
AI summary The document outlines a methodology for estimating energy savings and GHG emissions reductions from an amendment. Energy savings are calculated using cost per unit of energy saved, while GHG reductions are determined using fuel-specific emission factors and a social cost of carbon for monetization.
its. A 2018 study 23 found that each doubling of production for residential gas furnaces lead to a 5.7% to 8.9% decrease in manufacturing costs. Data collection and sources Data is collected on a productbyproduct basis, through market st...
AI summary The text discusses a 2018 study on the impact of increasing production for residential gas furnaces, showing decreased manufacturing costs with higher production. It outlines data collection methods for market studies, including market size, energy savings, and costs associated with moving from business-as-usual to policy cases. The results are summarized in tables showing benefits and costs per product category.
Product Category Shipped by 2030(Millions of Dollars) [2018$] ProductCosts 24 Product Benefits 25 Product Net Benefits Ceiling fans $66.50 $132.27 $65.77 http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181208/html/reg3eng.html 10/45 Date Filed: Ma...
AI summary The text presents a table of product categories with their associated costs, benefits, and net benefits, including ceiling fans, chillers, clean water pumps, and other refrigeration products, with figures in millions of dollars as of 2018. The data is sourced from a regulatory document filed on March 29, 2019, and includes a link to a Canada Gazette regulation from 2018.
Indicators Measure Performance GHG emissions are reduced to contribute to Canada’s goal to reduce GHG Energy efficiency emissions by at least 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. reports Import reports Market data Consumers save money by purchas...
AI summary The text outlines performance indicators related to reducing GHG emissions and promoting energy efficiency. It highlights consumer savings from purchasing efficient products, business benefits from using regulated equipment, and the importance of energy efficiency reports, market data, lab testing, and emission factors in measuring progress.
U.S. Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Carbon (IWGSCC), 2010. Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866. 18 Vary by manufacturer and are based on a number of...
AI summary The text references technical documents and studies related to energy efficiency, including the Social Cost of Carbon, appliance standards, and the impact of regulations on emissions. It also mentions cost calculations for technologies and installation, as well as benefits from energy savings and GHG reductions.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Year 2020 2021 2022 Incremental Demand Reduction (MW) 5.9 6.9 7.9 2 3 b) Please note that EfficiencyOne has inadvertently underestimated capacity-related avoided 4 costs in its modelling for the Business, Not-for-Profit...
AI summary EfficiencyOne underestimated capacity-related avoided costs in the BNI sector, using outdated values for transmission and distribution. This underestimate is immaterial and conservative, underreporting total benefits by less than 0.6%. Correct values and their differences from the model are detailed in an attachment.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-40: 2 3 Reference: Evid...
AI summary EfficiencyOne responds to a request regarding the calculation of $3.3 million annual investment in demand reduction initiatives and the expected 20.7 MW demand reduction under the 2020-2022 DSM Plan. The response outlines the design of demand reduction initiatives, including prescriptive and custom program components.
ear demand unit cost for demand-focused projects, relative to energy-focused projects All other cost information identical in both cases Incremental Energy Demand Savings Incremental Cost Savings (kWh) (kW) ($) Admin Cost ($) Incentives ($...
AI summary The text presents a comparison of cost and savings for demand-focused and energy-focused projects, including incremental energy savings, demand savings, and associated costs and incentives. It details the impact of removing demand-focused efforts from a custom retrofit base characterization and revising it with demand-focused efforts.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 TRC – Refers to the Total Resource Cost [Test]. 2 3 VFD – Refers to a Variable Frequency Drive. 4 5 Please note that standard SI unit abbreviations have not been defined here. 6 7 d) These values were calculated within N...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy and demand savings using Navigant’s ProCESS model, administrative cost allocation methods, and the basis for incremental cost information and incentives for various energy efficiency measures. It also notes that some cost estimates are preliminary and will be refined with operational data.
FL table lamp CT 8 LI, SF, MF EL (=8 years; operating hours 3.2 hours/day [7]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0); no source listed PSNH 10 Energy Star Lighting Program [17] DEER 16 EL(=16) [6] [29] [34] NG 5 EL and Measure Persistence EL(=16 [37] [3...
AI summary The text provides data on the expected lifetime (EL) and measure persistence (MP) for various lighting fixtures, including table lamps and CFLs, with references to different studies, programs, and technical documents. It includes information from organizations such as PSNH, DEER, and VEIC.
Current Value (in Years, or Hours if indicated) Basis and Documentation Source(s) May Vary by: Retail Store (RS), Retail Catalog (RC), Residential Measures Basis: Equipment Life (EL) or EL and Measure Persistence (EL&MP) Installed, Multifa...
AI summary The document provides information on the current value and lifespan of various residential heating measures, including burner replacement, ECM air furnaces, and furnace replacement, based on equipment life and measure persistence, with sources such as manufacturer data and studies.
[13] Residential Torchiere Assumptions, EPA Savings Calculator – Torchieres [14] Engineering estimate of wattage savings and annual hours use of 912.5 hours from October 1, 2004 Massachusetts, ME Rhode Island and Vermont Impact Evaluation...
AI summary The text references various energy efficiency programs and their associated assumptions, documentation, and data sources, including savings calculations, program lifetimes, and technical references from multiple states and organizations.
Home Energy Savings" 8th ed., 2003, ACEEE VT TPS [28] phone call with Honeywell by Dick Spellman in 2001 DEER [29] engineering judgement [30] “Evaluation of Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s 1997 Commercial Energy Efficiency Incentives Prog...
AI summary The text lists various sources and references used in evaluating energy efficiency programs, including studies by Quantum Consulting, Inc., and technical reports from organizations such as DEER, CALMAC, and SERA Inc., along with data from the Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute and VEIC experience.
10 [48] VT TPS - 25 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [9] DEER - 20 EL(=20) [32] CT-07 10 15 [48] VEIC 14 VT TPS 7 EL(=10 without MP, 7 with MP) &MP(=0.7), manufacturer data, studies [9] Enthalpy Economizer DEER 15 EL(=15) [30] [31] EL(=9....
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures, including Enthalpy Economizers, Custom HVAC Equipment, and Unitary systems, with associated energy savings and measure persistence. It references various programs and studies, such as DEER and VT TPS, and includes data from manufacturers and studies.
EL(=10 [5] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Energy Reduction 10 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=15 [7] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenc...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures, including energy reduction, water heater controls, EMS optimization, retrocommissioning, and variable speed drive control, along with their associated persistence values and sources such as CALMAC and EL&MP. It also references studies and data from manufacturers.
EL(=9 [36]; 11 [17]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced Pump Repair Sku 9;11 - included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=12; each project's expected life is 4 yrs but VFD's will be used for mult...
AI summary The text discusses various energy efficiency and management programs, including persistence and retention studies, variable time periods systems, and specific projects like VFD for environmental remediation and heat pump VSD. It references multiple studies and footnotes related to project lifespans and efficiency factors.
5 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 6 of 16 ECOMBI ECOMBI AND THE TRADITIONAL ELECTRIC STORAGE SYSTEMS During the autumn, the cold winter and into spring, your heating system will have to deal with different tempe...
AI summary The document describes traditional electric storage systems, including static and fan-forced storage heaters, explaining their operation during off-peak hours and their benefits in terms of energy efficiency and cost savings.
customer really requires it. These storage heaters are ideal for large and open areas. If the user manages the temperature optimally, storage heaters can result in an energy saving of 25%. A Fan Forced Storage Heater will not use the compl...
AI summary The text describes how storage heaters and the Ecombi system manage energy usage and temperature control. It highlights the energy-saving potential of storage heaters and explains how the Ecombi system dynamically manages energy charging to ensure comfort while optimizing costs.
gy option. ►► Storage, Combined storage, Convection, Frost protection and Automatic ECOMBI operation modes can be set up. ►► Weekly programming. ►► Visual alarm.
AI summary The text describes features of a device, including storage options, convection, frost protection, and automatic operation modes, as well as weekly programming and visual alarm capabilities.
-See Note 3 Blower Wattage- See Note 4 30 Minimum 120 Maximum Note 1: The heating ability of each system is dependent upon the power company’s availableoff-peak hours. Please con- tact Steffes for assistance in selecting the appropriate si...
AI summary The document provides technical specifications for the 4100 Comfort Plus Forced Air unit, including blower wattage, voltage options, and installation requirements. It outlines configurations, accessories, and warranty information.
Measure Admin Cost Unit Count High Bay Luminaire (60 000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 High Efficiency Circulator Pump 1.5kW Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 High Efficiency Circulator Pump 100W Small Business Energ...
AI summary The text provides a list of energy efficiency measures under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including various lighting and HVAC equipment, along with associated administrative costs and the number of units for some items.
Ground SourceFloors/Headers: Exposed (Geothermal) Heat Pump $4,000.00 $7,500.00 ENERGY STAR Most Rebate Efficient 2018 Amount: Minimum requirements: Regular Oil Boilerrebate: $500.00 $900.00 $12.00/SQ/R-value ENERGY increase STAR w/AFUE of...
AI summary The text outlines various rebate amounts and requirements for different heating systems, including geothermal heat pumps, oil boilers, and propane boilers, with specific emphasis on ENERGY STAR efficiency standards and R-value requirements for insulation upgrades.
r requirements: Regular rebate: $12.00/SQ/R-value increase Minimum R-value increase of R12 Propane Furnace Low-income rebates: $500.00 $900.00 ENERGY STAR Most Efficientincrease $20.00/SQ/R-value 2018 w/AFUE of 97.0% or higherR-value incre...
AI summary The text outlines rebate requirements for energy efficiency programs, including specific amounts for different types of heating systems and insulation upgrades, with some rebates tied to specific programs in Summerside.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 prepared by H. Gil Peach & Associa...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) regarding the reliance on evaluated and verified LES results for reporting purposes. E1 states that Econoler's evaluations are within accepted industry frameworks and that uncertainty in EUL values is addressed through qualitative technical assessments.
and far less expensive – exercise than “fixing” the current TRC by, among other things, assessing non-energy benefits. It may also be less contentious (see below). • Accuracy: Even if the TRC were to be corrected, in part by efforts to acc...
AI summary The text discusses the challenges with the Total Resource Cost (TRC) approach, highlighting concerns about accuracy, relevance, and alignment with existing legislation. It suggests that the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test may be a more effective and less contentious alternative for evaluating demand-side management (DSM) programs.
While providing useful information for program design, notably to determine incentive levels, these are not used as screening tests since they each address only one group of customers. WWW.DUNSKY.CA 4 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR...
AI summary The text discusses the use of different tests, such as the Societal Cost Test (SCT) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC), in program design for determining incentive levels. It highlights that these tests provide useful information but are not used as screening tests and should be viewed in relation to each other for a holistic perspective.
program costs in year t PCNt = Net participant costs in year t UICt = Utility increased supply costs in year t Specifically, at least six key components of the TRC calculation may be subject to entirely different methodological approaches...
AI summary The document discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) calculation, emphasizing how different regions approach the inclusion of costs and benefits associated with free riders in DSM measures. It highlights varying methodologies used in regions like Ontario, California, and Quebec.
analysis they can account for, and the benefits of measures with longer lifespans (e.g. new construction, envelope retrofits, ground source heat pumps) may literally be cut short as a result. WWW.DUNSKY.CA 12 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS...
AI summary The text discusses concerns about the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test's potential bias in neglecting non-energy benefits (NEBs) from demand-side management (DSM) measures. It highlights that while TRC accounts for costs, it may not fully capture benefits to participants, utilities, and society, especially from long-term measures like ground source heat pumps.
18 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 23 of 46 generate, for every million dollars in DSM program spending, a net increase in provincial GDP of between $2.7 and $4.1M, and from 22 to 33 job-years of net employment....
AI summary The text discusses the economic benefits of DSM programs, noting that they generate GDP and employment. It also addresses the use of discount rates in TRC calculations, questioning whether utility WACC is appropriate or if a societal discount rate should be used instead, as seen in regions like New York and New England.
ate, which is commonly viewed as the government’s cost of borrowing?23 New York and many New England states use a societal discount rate within their own TRCs. SUMMARY OF NEB ISSUES Increasingly, non-energy benefits – especially those that...
AI summary Nova Scotia's current Total Resource Cost (TRC) does not account for non-energy benefits, creating a bias against Demand-Side Management (DSM). Other regions have modified their TRC to include non-energy benefits or adopted different tests, such as the Modified TRC. This omission affects the evaluation of DSM programs and their overall impact on participants and society.
22 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 27 of 46 In Nova Scotia, this is not yet an important concern in that specific electric DSM goals are based on an assessment of the potential for cost-effective DSM, and not on...
AI summary Nova Scotia's DSM goals are based on cost-effective assessments rather than legislated targets. The Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act emphasizes least-cost procurement, aligning with the PAC test rather than the TRC. The use of the TRC for screening DSM was inconsistent with this policy, and the framework was modified in December 2011.
the corresponding guidelines recently developed by the National Efficiency Screening Project and adopted by the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships’ EM&V Forum – for Nova Scotia. Fig. 7. Overview of Concerns & Implications for Nova Sc...
AI summary The text discusses concerns related to the accuracy and bias in the Total Resource Cost (TRC) methodology, emphasizing the need for transparency and the inclusion of non-energy benefits. It references guidelines from the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) and the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships’ EM&V Forum, suggesting a shift to the Potential Annual Cost (PAC) test for better symmetry and vetting.
f move to the PAC test with its fully vetted inputs and while accounting for all costs. non-energy benefits in particular. inherent symmetry. RATEPAYER NESP silent on whether ratepayer Give strong consideration to value of the PAC test, VA...
AI summary The text discusses the TRC's potential misalignment with policy goals and the need to consider ratepayer dollar efficiency over societal efficiency. It also highlights the importance of the PAC test in evaluating DSM programs and mentions the Nova Scotia Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act.
30 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 35 of 46 We note that accounting for environmental externalities goes beyond what is needed to more accurately reflect the TRC’s stated “all consumers” perspective (it is in fa...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of accounting for environmental externalities and revisiting discounting practices in the context of energy efficiency programs. It notes that environmental costs already internalized, such as compliance with regulations, should not be double-counted. It also highlights the need to reassess the use of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for discounting future energy savings, especially in regions with shareholder-owned utilities.
vice's Energy Efficiency Plan, Re: Phase II. Vermont Public Service Board. (2011). Order approving updated avoided costs for use by the Energy Efficiency Utilites (EEU-2011-02). Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission. (2013, Oc...
AI summary The text includes references to energy efficiency plans, regulatory orders from Vermont and Washington, and an academic paper on industrial energy efficiency. It also mentions a resource value framework assessment in Nova Scotia and a document from Xcel Energy.
Qualitative Resource Value Framework – Nova Scotia Legacy TRC Program Name: Electric DSM Date: December 2014 1. Key Assumptions, Parameters and Summary of Results Program Analysis Level □ Portfolio Measure Life n/a Discount Rate WACC 2. Mo...
AI summary This document outlines the Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Summary of Results for the Electric DSM Program under the Qualitative Resource Value Framework – Nova Scotia Legacy TRC. It details monetized program administrator costs and benefits, including avoided energy and capacity costs, as well as participant costs and benefits such as fuel savings and non-energy benefits.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 b) No, it is not possible to unambiguously confirm that the electric efficiency expenditure data 3 used in the ACEEE Appendix B (available at: https://aceee.org/research-report/u1808) 4 are reported in a similar manner...
AI summary The document discusses the limitations in comparing electric efficiency expenditure data from the ACEEE Appendix B with budget data from Mr. Reed's direct evidence. It highlights that the ACEEE data may include additional state expenditures beyond PA activities and notes that per capita spending is not a commonly used metric, with ACEEE preferring revenue-based normalization.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-67: 2 3 Reference: Appendix B, Forward Looking Rate & Bill Impact Analysis, page 32, lines 5-7 4 state that “program components were not all scaled down in proportion to one another to 5 produce the Alternate...
AI summary The response explains that program components in the Alternate Plan were not scaled down proportionally due to higher unit costs and different investment levels compared to the Preferred Plan. EfficiencyOne increased investment in some components slightly but not to the same level as the Preferred Plan.
E-52018 DSM Evaluation Reports
183 passages
2.3 On-site Visits For the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator visited a total of 211 participant sites in the summer and fall of 2018. For all BNI program components, the objective of the on-site visits was to collect data to establish or vali...
AI summary In 2018, an evaluator conducted on-site visits to 211 participant sites to collect data for validating parameters in savings calculations for BNI program components. These visits were used to review project files, assess the completeness of simulation files, validate equipment functionality, and ensure proper metering processes at recycling facilities.
Table 5: 2018 Evaluated Results and Tracked Energy Savings at the Generator Sa ( ) 2 0 1 8 En in G W h er g g s y v Ev lu d te a a E N S S D M Pr og ra m S Co D M Pr t og ra m m p on en An l nu a In i ia l G t ro ss Sa in v g s An l nu a j...
AI summary Table 5 presents the 2018 evaluated results and tracked energy savings at the generator, showing data related to demand-side management programs and their impact on energy savings, including gross savings, net-to-gross ratio, and tracked energy savings.
Instant Savings In 2018, 669,550 products were sold through Instant Savings which represents fewer sales than in 2017. Although the overall savings achieved by Instant Savings in 2018 were higher than in 2017, due to higher average savings...
AI summary In 2018, Instant Savings sold 669,550 products, with LED A-type lamps being the most popular. Despite fewer sales than in 2017, overall savings increased due to higher average savings per product. Net electrical energy savings were 21.930 GWh and net peak demand savings were 2.572 MW. Evaluated savings were higher than tracked savings due to adjustments in unitary savings and increased spillover levels.
Efficient Product Rebates Efficient Product Rebates comprises one component, Business Energy Rebates. In 2018, Business Energy Rebates achieved 75.298 MWh in net energy savings and 11.327 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator.
AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates program includes Business Energy Rebates, which in 2018 achieved 75.298 MWh in net energy savings and 11.327 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator.
Strategic Energy Management Four participants generated savings in 2018, all of whom were new participants. The Evaluator determined that Strategic Energy Management achieved 1.455 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.190 MW in net p...
AI summary Strategic Energy Management achieved 1.455 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.190 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018. However, savings were 8% below tracked values due to untracked capital project savings and an adjustment from revised savings on a lighting project. Net savings were 13% below tracked values due to these adjustments.
Table 8: 2018 Evaluated Net Lifetime Energy Savings at the Generator DSM Program Program Component Annual Net Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Net Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average EUL (years) Residential Residential Efficient Appliance R...
AI summary Table 8 presents the 2018 evaluated net lifetime energy savings at the generator for various DSM programs, including Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement, Products Rebates, and BNI programs. The data includes annual and lifetime energy savings in GWh and weighted average EUL in years.
Table 10: 2018 Satisfaction Results DSM Program Program Component Participant Satisfaction Partner Satisfaction Residential Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement 9.6 - Products Rebates Instant Savings - 8.6 Green Heat 9.0 - Existing R...
AI summary Table 10 presents 2018 satisfaction results for various DSM program components, with average ratings above 8.0 on a 10-point scale. Most components saw improved ratings, except Strategic Energy Management and Energy Management Information Systems, which had low participant numbers.
Table 11: 2018 Planned Savings and Evaluated Results DSM Program Program Component Mid-course Planned Savings Evaluated Results Variance GWh MW GWh MW GWh (%) MW (%) Residential Residential Appliance Retirement 3.1 0.4 2.657 0.378 -13% -5%...
AI summary The ENS portfolio of DSM program components achieved 151.393 GWh in total net energy savings in 2018, 9% higher than planned. However, the total portfolio net peak demand savings of 25.542 MW fell short of the planned demand savings by 1%.
Table 13: Evaluated Net Energy Savings at the Generator, 2014-2018 DCM Drawers DOM Drowner Company Eı nergy (GW h) Energy (% of Total Portfolio) DSM Program DSM Program Component 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Residentia...
AI summary Table 13 presents evaluated net energy savings at the generator from 2014 to 2018, detailing energy savings and percentages of the total portfolio for various DSM programs, including appliance retirement, product rebates, home energy assessments, and business energy rebates. The data highlights the contribution of residential and BNI programs to overall energy savings.
Table 14: Evaluated Net Peak Demand Savings at the Generator, 2014-2018 DOM Due succes DCM Program Commonant Peak Demand (MW) Peak Demand (% of Total Portfolio) DSM Program DSM Program Component 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017...
AI summary Table 14 presents evaluated net peak demand savings at the generator from 2014 to 2018, showing data for residential, BNI, and portfolio totals. The table breaks down savings by program and year, highlighting the impact of various energy efficiency initiatives on peak demand.
Table 17: Recommendations on Business, Non-profit and Institutional Program Components No. Recommendation BER-R2. Implement a system that enables connecting Instant Rebates sales data to participants. While ENS implemented the Evaluator's...
AI summary The text discusses the need for a system to track Instant Rebates sales data linked to participants to improve data collection and better understand market conditions. Current data is limited, making it difficult to adjust savings assumptions and track purchases by contractors or end users.
APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Components Bibliographic References ECOX. Technical Information Bulletin No. E-004-EN: SEER, www.ecoxline.com (Last accessed March 3, 2016). EMERA INC., Management's Discussion & Analysis as at February 9, 2...
AI summary This appendix provides a bibliography of references related to energy efficiency programs, appliance standards, and emissions data, including sources such as Natural Resources Canada, Nova Scotia Power, and various studies conducted by organizations like Econoler and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Executive Summary – Appendix Report Program Components Bibliographic References NOVA SCOTIA POWER. Total System Emissions, https://www.nspower.ca/en/home/about us/environmental-commitment/air-emissions-reporting/total-system-emissions-all-...
AI summary The document provides a list of bibliographic references and citations related to energy efficiency, heating systems, and emissions in Nova Scotia. It includes references to Nova Scotia Power, Energy Nova Scotia, and various studies and reports on energy efficiency programs and technologies.
Margin of Error of the Surveys The 2017 EPI non-low-income survey margin of error was established by using the following formula, which corresponds to the margin of error calculation for a proportion (i.e. a value between 0 percent and 100...
AI summary The document explains the formula used to calculate the margin of error for the 2017 EPI non-low-income survey, which is based on the proportion calculation method.
Calculation of the Weighted Standard Deviation Since the overall adjustment ratio is based on a weighted average, the Evaluator also used the weighted standard deviation of the adjustment ratio for the calculation instead of the standard d...
AI summary The weighted standard deviation of the adjustment ratio for energy savings was calculated using a specific formula, resulting in a value of 0.360 for lighting measures. This approach was used instead of the standard deviation to account for the weighted average of the adjustment ratio.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) evaluation of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program comprised of two components: (1) Appliance Retirement (ARet); and (2) Instant Savin...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) program, specifically the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, which includes Appliance Retirement and Instant Savings. It provides participant numbers and savings data for each component and the overall program.
Table 1: Overall Participation and Savings for Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings ARet Energy Savings 4.568 GWh 0.58 2.657 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings1 5,595 appliances 35.043 GWh 0.57...
AI summary Table 1 provides data on participation levels and savings from residential efficient product rebates, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and net savings. The table also includes a section on appliance retirement, indicating the focus on retiring inefficient appliances to improve energy efficiency.
The overall evaluated net energy savings are 4 percent lower than those tracked by ENS. This difference is mainly due to the lower gross unitary savings value established for refrigerators, which was caused by a different distribution of r...
AI summary The evaluated net energy savings are 4% lower than those tracked by ENS, primarily due to a lower gross unitary savings value for refrigerators, influenced by changes in the distribution of retired refrigerator ages and a lower part-use factor from participant surveys compared to 2017 values. The same factors also caused a 4% lower evaluated net peak demand savings.
4.2 Calculation Methodology The ARet impact evaluation was conducted using the savings calculation methodology developed for the 2013 evaluation to comply with the general guidelines of the Uniform Methods Project (UMP) for refrigerator re...
AI summary The ARet impact evaluation uses a methodology developed for the 2013 evaluation, aligned with the Uniform Methods Project (UMP) guidelines. However, the methodology was adjusted due to updates in the UMP, specifically the removal of induced consumption calculations. The evaluation includes factors such as part-use, free-ridership, and secondary market impact, and uses tracked savings values from 2017.
4.14 NTGR Calculation Given the methodology used to obtain net savings, the NTGR could not be calculated as a sum of the percentages of all the effects values. As required by the UMP calculation methodology, the savings associated with eac...
AI summary The document explains the methodology for calculating the equivalent NTGR (Net Total Gross Savings) by using a weighted average of savings from scenarios with and without appliance retirement. It also presents a table with appliance-specific data and notes that HomeWarming replacements assume a NTGR of 1 due to their direct replacement nature.
Table 26: Comparison of ARet Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Revised Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 4.736 GWh 4.736 GWh 0.58 2.763 GWh Evaluation Results 4.568 GWh 4.5...
AI summary Table 26 compares Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) tracked savings and evaluation results for energy and peak demand savings at the generator level. The table shows initial and revised gross savings, NTGR (Net Total Gross Savings), and net savings for both energy and peak demand categories.
7 INSTANT SAVINGS EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the Instant Savings evaluation are as follows: - › Reporting on participant and partner perspectives - › Calculating program results, namely electrical first-ye...
AI summary The Instant Savings evaluation aims to report on participant and partner perspectives, calculate program results such as energy savings and GHG emissions, and analyze the market evolution of LED lamps. The methodology involved reviewing documentation, meeting with the program manager, and preparing data-collection instruments.
Product Selection, Preparation Process, and Rebate Amounts Retailers were generally satisfied with the selection of products included in Instant Savings, with an average satisfaction rating of 7.8 on a 10-point scale. Among the nine retail...
AI summary Retailers generally expressed satisfaction with the Instant Savings program's product selection, preparation process, and rebate amounts, though some suggested improvements such as diversifying eligible products and increasing rebates on lighting fixtures. The average satisfaction ratings were 7.8, 7.9, and 8.0 respectively.
9.1.1 Unitary Savings Values The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used in the tracking sheet for each product category rebated through Instant Savings. Using a combination of program data, engineering algorithms, and values fr...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised unitary savings values for various product categories under the Instant Savings program. Adjustments were made based on product popularity, replacement scenarios, and installation feasibility, with changes documented for LED lamps, smart thermostats, load sensing power bars, clotheslines, and large appliances.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for Instant Savings (Continued) Product Category Smart Power Bar Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Programmable Thermostat Clothesline Efficient Refrigerator Efficient Clothes Washer...
AI summary The table presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Instant Savings program, including energy savings at the meter and generator, net lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings. The data includes various product categories and their corresponding savings metrics.
Table 42: ENS Rebated LED Lamp Replacement Intention Replacement Intention 2015 2016 2017 2018 Early Replacement 81% 77% 70% 59% Replace on Burn-out 19% 23% 30% 41% 10.1.4 LED Prices
AI summary Table 42 presents data on the intention of customers to replace rebated LED lamps, showing a decline in early replacement and an increase in replacement on burn-out from 2015 to 2018. Section 10.1.4 discusses LED prices.
11 INSTANT SAVINGS RECOMMENDATIONS The evaluation revealed that Instant Savings again succeeded to achieve high levels of participation and savings in 2018. Some indicators such as low LED prices and a slight decrease in A-type LED lamp sa...
AI summary The evaluation of Instant Savings in 2018 showed high participation and savings. A-type LED lamps have matured, leading to the removal of rebates in 2019. The Evaluator recommends a socket study to assess remaining lighting savings potential and continued monitoring of LED market indicators to stay informed about market changes.
Table 46: Overall Participation and Savings for Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings ARet Energy Savings 4.568 GWh 0.58 2.657 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 5,595 appliances 35.043 GWh 0.57...
AI summary Table 46 presents data on participation levels and energy savings from residential efficient product rebates, including gross and net savings, as well as the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for different categories such as energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings.
CONCLUSION In 2018, the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program aimed to achieve 19.3 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.5 MW in peak demand savings at the generator. The Evaluator determined that the Residential Efficient Pr...
AI summary In 2018, the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program exceeded its planned energy and peak demand savings, achieving 24.588 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.951 MW in net peak demand savings. Instant Savings was the largest contributor, accounting for 89% of program savings. These savings equate to 15,062 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual avoided GHG emissions.
Efficient Clothes Washers For efficient clothes washers, the unitary savings value was determined by comparing the standard and efficient clothes washer annual energy consumption values. These energy consumption values were determined by u...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy efficiency of clothes washers by comparing standard and efficient models using the Integrated Modified Energy Factor (IMEF) and capacity. The analysis calculates annual energy consumption for both types of washers based on 290 loads per year and determines the unitary savings value. The evaluation uses data from ENERGY STAR and Natural Resources Canada to establish consumption values and highlights that hot and cold water usage was not considered in the initial calculations.
Table 40: Energy Consumption Breakdown for Standard and Efficient Clothes Washers Energy Consumption Breakdown for Clothes Washers Proportion of Overall Consumption 51 Standard Clothes Washer Electricity Consumption (kWh) Efficient Clothes...
AI summary Table 40 provides an energy consumption breakdown for standard and efficient clothes washers, highlighting significant savings in electricity use for efficient models. The water heating system accounts for 24.8% of overall consumption, with efficient washers using 110 kWh compared to 163 kWh for standard ones. The Evaluator estimated savings by considering the percentage of electrically heated water and internal heaters in washers.
Where: › CADR: Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) 53 › EFbase: Efficiency for baseline unit (CADR/W) › EFeff: Efficiency for efficient unit (CADR/W) › Hours: Annual operating hours (hours/year) › SBPbase: Standby power for baseline unit (W) ›...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of annual energy consumption for room air purifiers, including baseline and efficient units, based on efficiency metrics like CADR and standby power. It references the ENERGY STAR program and the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances to establish energy consumption values for both standard and efficient models.
Home Energy Assessment HEA encourages homeowners to improve the energy efficiency and comfort of their homes by improving building envelopes, space heating systems, water heating systems, and mechanical ventilation systems. Eligible measur...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program encourages homeowners to improve energy efficiency and comfort through various home improvements. The program underwent several changes, including the removal of tiered rebates and the inclusion of non-electrically heated households after receiving funding from the Low Carbon Economy Fund in 2018. An evaluation in 2018 included documentation reviews, interviews, billing analysis, and project reviews.
EPI Performance EPI aimed to achieve 17.1 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.0 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that EPI achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463...
AI summary The EPI program achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018. These savings corresponded to 7,827 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided GHG emissions. EPI's net lifetime energy savings were 107.988 GWh, with a weighted average EUL of 8.45 years. Over 10,813 households participated, and ENS distributed free clotheslines and diversified product offerings to boost participation.
EPI Market Evaluation Highlights EPI achieved a very high level of satisfaction among participants, who rated the component an average of 9.3 on a 10-point scale. Similar to past evaluations, the main reason provided for this high level of...
AI summary EPI achieved high participant satisfaction, with installers being a key factor. Installed products received strong ratings, except for thermostatic shower valves. Lack of funds was identified as the main barrier to energy efficiency upgrades. Respondents showed high interest in door sweeps and lighting controls for porch lights.
EPI Energy Savings To calculate EPI gross energy savings, the Evaluator performed a literature review of the unitary savings values of each category of product tracked and installed through EPI. The Evaluator found that the values used to...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated EPI gross energy savings by reviewing unitary savings values for various products and updating them based on new data. Installation rates for certain products were adjusted, and the NTGR was determined to estimate net energy savings, with different values for low-income and non-low-income participants.
In 2018, EPI generated 12.777 GWh in net energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator. Net lifetime savings were estimated at 107.988 GWh. Table 7 below compares the tracked and the evaluated savings at the gener...
AI summary In 2018, the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program achieved significant energy and demand savings. The program generated 12.777 GWh in net energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator, with estimated net lifetime savings of 107.988 GWh. Table 7 provides a comparison of tracked and evaluated savings.
Table 7: Comparison of EPI Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 16.093 GWh 14.468 GWh 0.93 13.480 GWh Evaluation Results 15.914 GWh...
AI summary Table 7 compares EPI tracked and evaluated savings at the generator, showing that evaluated net energy savings are 5% lower than tracked net energy savings. The differences are attributed to small decreases in installation rates and NTGR values, as well as unitary savings adjustments.
2017 2018 Program Program Component Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R C C Home Energy Assessment C C R Existing Residential Program Gree...
AI summary The table outlines various energy efficiency programs and their components, indicating their processes and impacts in different years. It highlights program components such as appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and efficient product installation, noting their roles in process and impact markets for 2017 and 2018.
version of HOT2000 and of the rating system have been put in place; with these new versions, a rating in GJ reflects the modelled consumption of a home and 0 GJ is the best rating a home can achieve. Homeowners have 12 months to complete t...
AI summary The document outlines the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, which provides rebates and low-interest financing for energy efficiency upgrades. It details the process for homeowners to complete upgrades, schedule assessments, and receive final EnerGuide ratings. The program includes eligible measures such as insulation, windows, heat pumps, and ventilation systems, with incentive adjustments made in July 2018.
Solar Domestic Hot Water The design details of the solar DHW systems installed through HEA are not included in the tracking sheet. Therefore, the unitary savings value for this equipment is determined based on the average value of DHW syst...
AI summary The unitary savings value for solar domestic hot water (DHW) systems installed through Home Energy Assessments (HEA) was updated to 2,945 kWh per year, based on data from 40 systems installed between 2016 and 2018 through Green Heat. Previously, the value was determined using data from 2015 to 2017.
3.2.8 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings at the generator are presented in Table 16 further below. Overall, the annual gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator amounted to 6.366 GWh and 1.800 MW respectively, which...
AI summary The annual gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are reported as 6.366 GWh and 1.800 MW, respectively, with a total lifetime energy savings of 127.258 GWh. The weighted average EUL value for gross energy savings is 20.0 years, calculated using a line loss factor of 1.099, derived from HEA participants' rate codes.
3.4 Unconverted D Assessment Spillover Since the 2014 evaluation, another spillover effect associated with unconverted D assessment savings has been considered. This effect corresponds to the savings associated with those measures implemen...
AI summary This section discusses the unconverted D assessment spillover effect, which includes energy savings from participants who did not complete an E assessment within the 12-month period. Data from 2016 and 2018 evaluations show that 54% of expired participants installed upgrades, with an average electrical savings of 2,283 kWh per participant. In 2018, total spillover savings were estimated at 0.836 GWh and 0.236 MW.
3.6 Net Savings Net savings represent the savings that can be reliably attributed to a program component. For HEA, net savings are calculated by deducting the Green Heat savings, applying the aforementioned NTGR value to the evaluated gros...
AI summary Net savings for the Home Energy Assistance (HEA) program are calculated by adjusting gross savings with specific factors, resulting in estimated energy and peak demand savings. The calculation also considers greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy usage over time, yielding a weighted average energy use life (EUL) of 20.0 years.
Table 26: Tracked and Revised Unitary Savings Values for Biomass and DHW Measures Measure Unitary Energy Savings (kWh) Unitary Peak Demand Savings (kW) Tracked Revised Tracked Revised Wood Stove with Electrical Resistance Baseline 10,443 N...
AI summary The document presents tables detailing tracked and revised unitary savings values for biomass and DHW measures, highlighting changes in HPWHs and discrepancies in MSHPs due to outdated values from the 2016 Evaluation Report. These revisions aim to improve accuracy in energy savings calculations.
10.3 Participation History Since 2012, EPI has contributed significantly to the growth of energy efficient lighting product penetration in the Nova Scotia market by providing direct installation of such products to over 100,000 households....
AI summary Since 2012, the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program has significantly increased energy-efficient lighting product penetration in Nova Scotia. However, participation levels declined in 2018, with a 21% drop in participants and a 27% drop in installed products compared to 2017. The decline is attributed to a smaller pool of potential participants and a shift in product types, with A-type lamps decreasing and non-A-type lamps increasing in usage.
13.1.3 Peak Demand Savings Peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand of the electricity system. The projected electricity demand peak period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m....
AI summary Peak demand savings are calculated based on the timing of electricity demand during peak periods in Nova Scotia, specifically between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. in December to February. The Evaluator used various studies and ratios, including those from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan and the Residential Lighting Metering Study, to determine peak demand-to-energy ratios for different product categories such as DHW products, lighting, and LED holiday lights.
Table 47: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Apartments LED Lamps Category of Product 9 W Replacing 40 W 9 W Replacing 60 W 9 W Replacing 100 W 9.5 W Replacing 40 W 9.5 W Replacing 60 W 9.5 W Replacing...
AI summary Table 47 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI Apartments, detailing energy savings, installation rates, and lifetime energy savings for different LED lamp replacements. The data includes metrics like unitary savings value, interactive effects factor, and line loss factor.
Table 49: Average Participant Spillover Level for EPI Non-low-income Participants Product Category Average Participant Spillover Level Sample Size Population Size62 Margin of Error Percentage of Gross Energy Savings All Products Owners 3%...
AI summary Table 49 provides data on the average participant spillover level for EPI non-low-income participants, including statistics on sample size, population size, margin of error, and percentage of gross energy savings. The section '13.3 Net Savings' likely discusses the financial implications of these energy savings.
Table 50: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI L E D La m p s Sa in ( ) To ta l Ne t En t t he Ge to G W h er g g s a ne ra r y v – 0. 0 5 7 5. 9 0 8 0. 0 4 6 0. 0 3 9 0. 2 2 2 0. 0 2 4 E f fe ive Us fu...
AI summary Table 50 evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It includes metrics such as net energy savings, effective useful life, net life energy savings, and peak demand savings, along with the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR).
Influence of Factors on Decision to Solar or Biomass 2018 Equipment Installed Sample Size Mean The program component rebate 23 4.4 Information provided by ENS 23 3.7 Don't know/Refused excluded from calculations
AI summary The text discusses a 2018 study examining the influence of factors on the decision to adopt solar or biomass energy. It includes data on equipment installed, sample size, and mean values for program component rebates and information provided by ENS.
Revised Savings To review the new unitary savings calculations, the Evaluator first assessed the reasonableness of each variable. - › QDHW: This value is drawn from Efficiency Vermont, but the source of the calculation is not publicly avai...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised savings calculations for water heating and heat pump systems. Key variables like QDHW, EFBase, EFHPWH, WHHF, and COP were reassessed using data from Efficiency Vermont, literature reviews, and performance studies. Revised savings values were set at 790 kWh and 1,312 kWh for homes with different heating systems, with recommendations for using updated metrics like COP and demand-to-energy ratios for peak demand savings.
Equations 2 and 3 are used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for LED Holiday Lights installed through EPI. Annual Unitary Savings $$\left[\frac{kWh}{yr}\right] = \frac{(Displaced\ Wattage)[W] \times HOU\left[\frac{h}{day}\right...
AI summary The text provides equations used to calculate annual unitary savings for LED holiday lights installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Equation 2 calculates the annual savings in kilowatt-hours per year, while Equation 3 calculates the displaced wattage based on the difference between old and new wattage.
Equation 4 below is used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for the faucet aerators installed through EPI. Annual Unitary Savings $$\left[\frac{kWh}{yr}\right]$$ $$= \frac{\left(DHW_{base} - DHW_{efficient}\right)\left[\frac{gal...
AI summary The document provides equations and parameters used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for faucet aerators installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. The calculations involve domestic hot water consumption, efficiency factors, and conversion constants.
Table 17: Unitary Savings Values for Low-flow Showerheads24 Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Baseline Flow Rate [gpm] qbase Variable (2.0 gpm, 2.25 gpm, or 2.5 gpm) Variable (2.0 gpm, 2.25 gpm, or...
AI summary Table 17 outlines unitary savings values for low-flow showerheads in single-family homes and apartments, including parameters such as flow rates, shower usage, and water heater efficiency. These values are calculated based on data from EPI tracking sheets and other studies.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. EnerGuide rating An EnerGuide (official brand of Natural Resources Canada) rating is a standard measure of the home's energy performance. It is a measure of the...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and measurement, including EnerGuide ratings, effective useful life, and equivalent CO2. These definitions are used to assess building performance, energy savings, and greenhouse gas equivalencies.
Incentives and Home Labels Jurisdictions use a range of incentive amounts and base their incentives on different benchmarks depending on their location, program delivery history, market research, and home label certifications. Offering a r...
AI summary Jurisdictions use varying incentive amounts based on location, program history, and home label certifications to attract different types of builders. Incentives help builders improve efficiency over time, and associating programs with labels like ENERGY STAR helps builders stand out to customers.
NHC On-site Visits and Simulation Review Highlights On-site visits and simulation file reviews were conducted for 10 NHC projects to determine the completeness and accuracy of the information in the as-built simulation files and data-colle...
AI summary On-site visits and simulation file reviews for 10 NHC projects revealed incomplete documentation, with eight projects missing key building plans and as-built reports. Adjustments to energy consumption values were made following NRCan protocols, showing a 0.3% global adjustment, a significant improvement from 3% in 2016.
Table 4: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component Program Component 2017 2018 Program Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in 2017 and 2018, focusing on process, market, and impact evaluations across various residential and business energy efficiency programs.
ts remained the same. This new version of the rating system and HOT2000 are meant to provide homeowners with more useful information about their new homes' energy performance. New Home Construction 3 4 ENS considers a home to be electrical...
AI summary The document discusses the new version of the energy rating system and HOT2000 software, which provide homeowners with more useful information about their new homes' energy performance. It also outlines incentives for new home construction based on energy efficiency standards, including ENERGY STAR and R2000 certifications.
Table 9: Project Registration Overview Project Registration Processes Efficiency mont Ver Connecticut Energize National Grid Rhode Island Fortis BC wer NB Po ENS Total Fees Builders Pay No fee 2 Fee paid to HERS rater or energy advisor...
AI summary Table 9 outlines project registration processes across various entities, including ENS and others, detailing fees, registration methods, and requirements. Builders in ENS territory pay a portion of the fee, with ENS covering the remainder.
Table 11: Incentive Amounts and Basis for Incentive by Program Range (CAD) Program Low High Efficiency Vermont Energize Connecticut National Grid Rhode Island Fortis BC^ NB Power ENS> Incentive Amounts Offered $500 $1,000 $1,001 $2,000...
AI summary Table 11 outlines incentive amounts and their basis for various energy efficiency programs, including Efficiency Vermont, Energize Connecticut, National Grid Rhode Island, Fortis BC, NB Power, and ENS. It specifies ranges for incentive amounts and the criteria used to determine eligibility, such as HERS scores and code compliance.
Lessons Learned by Respondents Offering several incentive tiers provides options for many different types of builders . All respondents noted offering multiple incentive tiers designed to provide differing efficiency levels so builders can...
AI summary Respondents emphasized the importance of offering multiple incentive tiers to encourage builders to adopt energy efficiency gradually, and highlighted the value of home labels and certifications in helping builders differentiate themselves from competitors. Examples include ENERGY STAR and EnerGuide labels.
4.1 On-site Visits and Simulation Review The Evaluator conducted on-site visits for and reviewed the simulation files of 10 NHC projects selected among those that generated electrical savings and completed the as-built assessment (or N ass...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted on-site visits and reviewed simulation files for 10 NHC projects to assess the accuracy and completeness of as-built simulation data. The review used the EnerGuide home evaluation framework, with a focus on improved data collection due to the updated EnerGuide version 15.
HVAC Equipment Version 15 of EnerGuide includes enhanced specifications for HVAC equipment. The guidelines provided by the new EnerGuide version enabled EAs to successfully collect the specifications for the new equipment during the post-r...
AI summary Version 15 of EnerGuide includes enhanced HVAC equipment specifications, which EAs used during post-retrofit evaluations. A review of 10 files identified 18 errors, mainly related to exhaust fan counts, HRV flow rates, and SEER values, which could affect energy consumption results.
Overestimation Ratio The OR is used to adjust the modelled energy consumption values generated by the HOT2000 software because it tends to slightly overestimate savings. The ORs established as part of the HEA evaluation were used to adjust...
AI summary The Overestimation Ratio (OR) is used to adjust energy consumption values from the HOT2000 software, which overestimates savings. ORs were established for the 2018 HEA evaluation, distinguishing between homes with and without heat pumps. Additional analyses were conducted for the to-code model, which uses electrical baseboards. The OR used for tracked savings calculation was 16 percent across all scenarios.
Method 2: Savings per EnerGuide Point For 2018, the savings per EnerGuide point method was used for one participant who registered before 2015 and who did not have a to-code energy consumption value. The method was also used for one partic...
AI summary The document discusses the use of the 'Savings per EnerGuide Point' method in 2018 for energy efficiency evaluations. It explains that the method was applied to two specific cases due to inconsistencies in energy consumption data. The average baseline EnerGuide rating of 78 is based on the 2012 National Building Code and used in HOT2000 Version 10. The savings per EnerGuide point value of 1,278 kWh was calculated using data from 2015 NHC participants and adjusted by an overestimation ratio of 16%.
Table 15: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings NHC Passive House Pilot Total Number of Participants 645 7 652 Energy Savings Initial Gross Energy Savings (GWh) 5.256 0.109 5.365 Overestimation Ratio - - - Revised Gross Energy Savin...
AI summary Table 15 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings from the NHC and Passive House Pilot programs. It includes metrics such as initial and revised energy savings, line loss factors, and effective useful life, providing a detailed breakdown of energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Table 17: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Parameter NHC Passive House Pilot Total Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 4.288 0.081 4.369 NTGR 0.95 0.39 - Total Net Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh...
AI summary Table 17 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for the NHC and Passive House Pilot programs. It includes metrics such as energy savings, peak demand savings, line loss factors, and effective useful life to assess the overall impact of these initiatives.
OT2000 version 11 rating system in upcoming years, the Evaluator recommends conducting a billing analysis specific to NHC participants when a large enough sample becomes available to both consider the various versions of HOT2000 (i.e. vers...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends conducting a billing analysis for NHC participants to evaluate the impact of different HOT2000 versions and heating systems. Issues with manual data entry and inconsistent formulas in the 2018 tracking sheet were identified, and revised formulas were shared with ENS for future use.
APPENDIX II ON-SITE VISITS AND HOT2000 SIMULATION REVIEW PROTOCOL Quality assurance auditor / Quality Assurance Specialist: File number (N) Date of quality assurance audit (YYYY/MM/DD): N Energy advisor name: House evaluation date (YYYY/MM...
AI summary This document outlines a quality assurance audit protocol for on-site visits and HOT2000 simulation reviews, including data collection forms and evaluation criteria for energy consumption differences and data sufficiency.
Interest and Participation in Non-lighting Measures ENS developed a long-term diversification strategy to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures. The Evaluator assessed participants' interest in and intentions to implement n...
AI summary ENS developed a strategy to promote non-lighting energy efficiency measures. Survey results show that about half of participants plan to implement such measures, with HVAC being the most common category. Contractors suggest adding specific measures and increasing incentives for heating and refrigeration. Many participants use payback thresholds, with most requiring payback periods of five years or less, which may be a barrier for some non-lighting measures.
Table 2: Net-to-gross Ratio for BER Mail-in 2018 Free-ridership Level 17% Spillover Level 0% NTGR 0.83 BER Instant Rebates
AI summary Table 2 provides the net-to-gross ratio for BER Mail-in in 2018, showing a free-ridership level of 17% and a spillover level of 0%, with an NTGR of 0.83. The section on BER Instant Rebates likely discusses rebate programs for businesses.
Table 4: Overall Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BER Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 101.271 GWh 101.271 GWh 0.76 77.208 GWh Evaluation Resul...
AI summary Table 4 compares tracked and evaluated savings for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, showing differences in energy and peak demand savings between ENS tracked savings and evaluation results, with adjustments based on the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR).
BER Recommendations The 2018 impact evaluation revealed that the accuracy of reported savings had improved, especially for Mail-in. In addition, ENS has been proactive in adapting their Instant Rebates offerings to the evolving market by r...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program highlights the need for process improvements, including reviewing eligibility criteria, improving data tracking, connecting participants with non-lighting contractors, and analyzing incentive levels for non-lighting measures. These recommendations aim to enhance program performance and savings accuracy.
Table 6: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for BER 2017 Recommendations Status 2017 BER-R1. Continue to monitor the market evolution of LED lamps and adapt the BER offer when needed. Implemented 2017 BER-R2. Identify opportunit...
AI summary The table outlines the implementation status of 2017 recommendations for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. ENS is continuing market analysis on LED lighting to adapt the BER offer as the market evolves quickly.
BER Instant Rebates Since participant information is not tracked systematically for Instant Rebates, the number of participants is unknown. Available information does indicate the number of rebated measures sold by distributors. Figure 4 b...
AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program saw a significant increase in participation in 2018, with 506,533 rebated measures sold, driven in part by a single customer purchasing 67,311 LED measures. LED downlight lamps contributed the largest share of gross savings in 2018, followed by LED linear fixtures and outdoor LED fixtures. The average unitary savings increased to 150 kWh in 2018.
2 BER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the BER evaluation are as follows: - › Assessing the effectiveness of BER design and delivery - › Reporting on participant and partner perspectives - › Calculating program...
AI summary The BER evaluation objectives include assessing the program's effectiveness, reporting on stakeholder perspectives, calculating energy and GHG savings, and analyzing LED lamp market evolution. The methodology involved document reviews, meetings with program managers, and statistical sampling with a 10% margin of error at a 90% confidence level.
Interviews with Distributors In November 2018, CRA conducted 11 interviews with Instant Rebates participating distributors. These interviews mainly served to establish free-ridership levels for the highest-selling lighting measure categori...
AI summary In November 2018, CRA conducted interviews with Instant Rebates participating distributors to assess free-ridership levels, distributor satisfaction, and ways to improve the service. Distributors also provided feedback on incentive levels and the relationship between Mail-in and Instant Rebates programs.
New Construction vs. Retrofit The Instant Rebates participant survey sample included 30 end users who purchased eligible lighting measures for their own businesses and 20 contractors who purchased them for clients. For a majority of contra...
AI summary The Instant Rebates and Mail-in programs serve both new construction and retrofit projects. Contractors predominantly purchased lighting measures for new construction, while end users through BER focused more on retrofit projects. The Evaluator found that Mail-in participants mostly used lighting measures for retrofit projects.
4 IMPACT EVALUATION FOR BER MAIL-IN The objective of the 2018 BER Mail-in impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary The 2018 BER Mail-in impact evaluation aims to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, providing insights into the effectiveness of the Business Energy Rebates program.
4.1 Gross Savings Gross savings refer to changes in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants, regardless of their reasons for participating.7 For each Mail-in Rebates project, ENS tracks annual gross savings using th...
AI summary Gross savings are calculated based on energy consumption changes from participant actions. ENS uses the CIRx Screening Tool to track annual savings for Mail-in Rebates projects. In 2018, 366 projects were implemented by 257 participants, with 78 projects reviewed through on-site visits. An adjustment ratio is used to revise savings estimates for each measure category.
Summary of Adjustments to Gross Savings Since lighting measures represent 75 percent of Mail-in savings, applying an adjustment factor to this measure category had the largest impact on gross savings. The most common adjustment was revisin...
AI summary Lighting measures account for 75% of Mail-in savings, and adjustments to this category had the largest impact on gross savings. Adjustments included revising HOUs and efficient wattage values, with 23% of measures requiring over 5% adjustment. Other categories like motors, HVAC, and refrigeration also saw significant adjustments, while some agricultural and kitchen measures were not extrapolated due to high margins of error.
Table 10: Adjustment Ratios per BER Mail-in Measure Category per of sures Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Measure Category Total Sample Calculated Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Extrapo- lated Overall Adjustment Ratio Calculated Adjus...
AI summary Table 10 presents adjustment ratios for various BER measure categories, including energy savings and peak demand savings. The data shows calculated and overall adjustment ratios, along with margins of error and extrapolation status for each category.
Interactive Effects When a measure implemented as part of BER Mail-in is affected by interactive effects, this is taken into account by the gross savings standard equation presented in the CIRx Screening Tool. For BER, interactive effects...
AI summary The document discusses how interactive effects are considered in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, particularly for lighting projects, using the CIRx Screening Tool to adjust factors based on site visits and observations by the Evaluator.
Effective Useful Life As part of the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life (EUL) values used by ENS to calculate the energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The EUL values of all measures were rev...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation reviewed ENS's use of effective useful life (EUL) values for energy savings calculations. Most non-lighting measures were accurately tracked, but some lighting measures, such as downlight fixtures and LED luminaires, had inaccurately tracked EUL values. The Evaluator revised these values based on the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Revised Gross Savings The savings achieved by Mail-in measure category are presented in Table 11 further below. Both the energy and peak demand savings were revised by applying the adjustment ratios discussed in Subsection 4.1.1. The savin...
AI summary The revised gross savings for the BER Mail-in measure category are calculated using adjustment ratios and line loss factors provided by NSP. The total gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are 24.596 GWh and 3.702 MW, with lifetime energy savings of 379.986 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 15.4 years.
Table 11: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in Me Ca te as ur e g or y H V A C L ig h in t g Re fr ig io t er a n M d V to o rs a n F Ds Co d A m p re ss e ir Ag ic l l tu r u ra En Sa in er g y v g s Tr ke d G En S...
AI summary Table 11 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Mail-in program, detailing energy savings across various categories such as HVAC, lighting, refrigeration, and agriculture. The table includes metrics like tracked gross energy savings, adjusted ratios, effective useful life, and peak demand savings across different sectors.
4.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use attributable specifically to Mail-in Rebates. Net savings were estimated by applying the above NTGR to the revised gross savings, as illustrated in the following equation...
AI summary Net savings from BER Mail-in rebates are calculated using a revised gross savings and NTGR, resulting in 20.414 GWh energy savings and 3.073 MW peak demand savings. These savings avoided 12,506 tonnes of CO2 eq annually. The net lifetime energy savings are 315.388 GWh, with a weighted average EUL value of 15.4 years.
Table 13: Revised Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in Ca Me te as ur e g or y C H V A L ig h in t g Re fr ig io t er a n M d V to o rs a n F Ds Co d A m p re ss e ir Ag ic l l tu r u ra En Sa in er g y v g s Re ise d G En Sa...
AI summary Table 13 presents revised net energy and peak demand savings for the BER Mail-in program, detailing energy savings and peak demand reductions across various sectors such as commercial, residential, and agricultural. The table includes metrics like revised gross energy savings, net energy savings, effective life, and peak demand savings in gigawatt-hours and megawatts.
Revised Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in (Continued) Me Ca te as ur e g or y K i he tc n W He in te t a r a g Pu in m p g So la r fo To l A l l ta r Ca ies te g or En Sa in er g y v g s Re ise d G En Sa ing he M ( G W h )...
AI summary The document presents revised net energy and peak demand savings for the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) mail-in program, including various metrics such as energy savings, peak demand savings, and effective useful life in years. These figures are categorized under different headings and are presented in a table format.
Table 15: Adjustment Ratios per BER Instant Rebates Measure Category Measure Category Energy Savings Adjustment Ratio Demand Savings Adjustment Ratio LED Linear Fixtures 1.000 1.000 LED Linear Lamps 1.009 1.009 LED General-use and Decorati...
AI summary The document presents adjustment ratios for various energy efficiency measures under the BER Instant Rebates program. ENS applied recommended usage and wattage values, with adjustments made for specific items such as occupancy sensors and LED downlight fixtures.
In-service Rates To establish ISRs, the Evaluator conducted a literature review in 2016 of other jurisdictions with an upstream commercial program service similar to Instant Rebates because research indicates that a percentage of purchased...
AI summary The Evaluator established In-Service Rates (ISRs) based on a 2016 literature review, applying an 85% ISR for LED lamps and 100% for other measures like fixtures and pumps. This approach was later applied in 2018 across all measure categories, with results aligning with Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) tracking.
Peak Demand Savings Since no on-site visits were conducted for Instant Rebates in 2018, no PCF specific to the lighting measures sold through the service could be established. Hence, a PCF of 62.4 percent was applied to Instant Rebates. Th...
AI summary The text discusses the application of Peak Cost Factors (PCF) to different energy efficiency measures. A 62.4% PCF was used for indoor lighting measures based on past data, while 100% PCF was applied to outdoor lighting and circulator pumps due to their continuous or predictable usage patterns.
Table 16: Revised Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values by Instant Rebates Measure Category Measure Category Subcategory Tracked Equivalent EUL (Years) Rated Life (Hours) Annual HOU Revised EUL (Years) Revised Equivalent EUL (Years) 1 x...
AI summary Table 16 provides revised equivalent effective useful life values for various instant rebates measure categories, including lighting fixtures, lamps, and pumps, with details on tracked equivalent EUL, rated life, annual HOU, and revised EUL values.
Revised Gross Savings The energy and peak demand savings associated with Instant Rebates were calculated using the unitary savings values, ISRs, and interactive effects factors revised as part of this evaluation. The savings at the generat...
AI summary The revised gross savings for Instant Rebates were calculated based on unitary savings values and interactive effects factors. The generator-level energy savings amounted to 76.053 GWh, with a total lifetime energy savings of 716.364 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 9.4 years. Peak demand savings were estimated at 11.144 MW.
Table 17: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates Ca Me te as ur e g or y L in D F L E ea r ix tu re s L in D La L E ea r m p s Ge l-u d ne ra se a n ive De t L E D co ra La m p s Re f le L E D to c r La m p s...
AI summary Table 17 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, including various metrics such as number of units, energy savings, and adjustment ratios for different categories.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Me Ca te as ur e g or y D ire io l a d t c na n Ar h i l L E D F ix te tu tu c c ra re s Oc cu p an cy Se ns or s Pu m p s fo To l A l l ta r Me as ur es L in...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BER instant rebates, including metrics such as effective useful life, total gross energy savings, and peak demand savings across various categories.
5.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to Instant Rebates. Net savings were estimated by applying the overall NTGR presented above to the revised gross savings, as exemplifie...
AI summary Net savings are calculated using the Netting and Transfer Guidance Ratio (NTGR) applied to revised gross savings. Total net energy and peak demand savings are estimated at 54.884 GWh and 8.255 MW, respectively, leading to 35,622 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. These calculations use a 2017 Nova Scotia-specific GHG factor and data from Nova Scotia Power.
Table 20: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates Ca Me te as ur e g or y L E D L in ea r F ix tu re s L E D L in r La ea m p s L E D Ge l-u d ne ra se a n De ive La t co ra m p s D Re L E f le to r La c m p s...
AI summary Table 20 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, detailing metrics such as energy savings, peak demand reduction, and effective useful life for various lighting fixtures and programs.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Ca Me te as ur e g or y L E D D ire io l a d t c na n Ar h i l F ix te tu tu c c ra re s Oc cu p an cy Se ns or s Pu m p s To l fo A l l ta r Me as ur es Sa E...
AI summary This table evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, showing various metrics such as energy savings in gigawatt-hours, peak demand savings in megawatts, and effective useful life in years across different categories like LED directional and occupancy sensors, pumps, and total measures.
Table 21 below compares the savings tracked by ENS to the 2018 evaluated savings for Instant Rebates.
AI summary Table 21 compares the savings tracked by ENS to the 2018 evaluated savings for Instant Rebates, highlighting the performance of the program over time.
Table 21: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator – BER Instant Rebates Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 76.036 GWh 76.036 GWh 0.73 55.506 GWh Evaluation...
AI summary Table 21 compares tracked and evaluated savings from BER Instant Rebates. Energy and peak demand savings are presented, showing slight differences between tracked and evaluated values. Evaluated savings were slightly lower than tracked savings due to minor adjustments and changes in the NTGR.
6 OVERALL BER RESULTS Table 22 below compares the savings tracked by ENS to the 2018 evaluated savings for BER.
AI summary Table 22 compares the savings tracked by ENS to the 2018 evaluated savings for BER, highlighting the performance of the Bill-Entry Rebate program in terms of energy savings.
Table 22: Comparison of Overall Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BER Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 101.271 GWh 101.271 GWh 0.76 77.208 GWh Evaluation Resu...
AI summary Table 22 compares tracked and evaluated savings for the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program, including energy and peak demand savings. ENS Tracked Savings and Evaluation Results are presented for both energy and peak demand, with adjustments made based on the Netting and Transfer Guidance Ratio (NTGR).
Table 23: Overall Participation and Savings for BER Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Mail-in Rebates Mail-in Rebates Energy Savings 24.596 GWh 0.83 20.414 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 366 projects 379.986 GWh 0.83 315.388...
AI summary Table 23 presents the overall participation and savings for the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program, including energy and peak demand savings, NTGR values, and net savings for both mail-in and instant rebate categories. It highlights the cumulative impact of the program across various metrics.
8 BER RECOMMENDATIONS The 2018 impact evaluation revealed that the accuracy of reported savings had improved, especially for Mail-in. In addition, ENS has been proactive in adapting their Instant Rebates offerings to the evolving market by...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation highlights improvements in reported savings accuracy for Mail-in and Instant Rebates, but identifies process issues, including overlapping eligibility and limited data tracking. Recommendations focus on aligning BER logic models, improving data systems, connecting participants with non-lighting contractors, and adjusting incentive levels for non-lighting measures with longer payback periods.
ication on my behalf - 98. (Don't know) - 99. (Refused) - P7. Did you interact with any Efficiency Nova Scotia staff during the process of applying for the rebate? [DO NOT READ, CODE ONE ONLY] - 1. Yes - 2. No - 98. Don't know - 99. Refuse...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to program awareness and participation, focusing on customer experiences with Efficiency Nova Scotia's rebate programs, including ease of application, staff responsiveness, and satisfaction with rebate amounts and eligible measures.
FR2. A RANGE Efficiency Nova Scotia paid your organization $[REBATE VALUE FROM SAMPLE BY CATEGORY] for the energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures. If your organization had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would yo...
AI summary The text discusses a rebate program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, asking respondents about their likelihood of implementing energy-efficient measures without the rebate. It includes questions about lighting products and their certification, as well as the impact of the rebate on purchasing decisions.
FR3c. [IF FR2≥5] If the program rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed implementing the [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures by at least one year? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR4. Using a scale from...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to energy-efficient measure implementation, including the influence of program rebates and information from program representatives, as well as the use of payback period thresholds in decision-making.
Would Have Paid 201 15 2016 2017 201 18 Cost of Project Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0 = "Definitely Would Not Have Paid" 10 = "Definitely Would Have Paid") Paid cost of project 72 5.6 69 6.7 70...
AI summary The text presents survey data on awareness and willingness to pay for energy efficiency programs, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates Program. Respondents were asked about their awareness of premium lighting products and their actions if the program had not been available. Results indicate a moderate level of awareness and a tendency to implement similar measures even without the program.
Influence of Factors in Decision to 201 16 20 17 20 )18 Implement Energy-Efficient Measures Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0 = "No influence" 10 = "Great influence") The assistance provided by your on-site energy...
AI summary The text presents data on the influence of various factors in the decision to implement energy-efficient measures, with a focus on program rebates and assistance from energy managers. It also includes information on the use of payback period thresholds by companies for making energy efficiency decisions.
FR5c. Just to be sure I understand correctly, you are saying that the measure was already attractive enough in terms of financial payback to be implemented without the rebate? Payback Period was Short Enough 2016 2016 2017 2016 2017 2 Samp...
AI summary The discussion centers on the financial payback period of energy efficiency measures and whether they were attractive enough to be implemented without rebates. It also explores the presence of energy efficiency processes and policies in facilities, and whether projects with longer payback periods were implemented.
Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials Led to Examine Options for Facility 2016 2017 2018 Sample Size 59 65 53 Agree 61% 62% 53% Disagree 37% 35% 43% Don't know/refused 2% 3% 4% Base: Respondents who previously saw ENS...
AI summary This chunk presents survey data on the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy-efficiency promotional materials on company representatives' decision-making processes, particularly regarding the cost-effectiveness of energy measures. It also includes data on the use of contractors listed on the Efficiency Trade Network under the Business Energy Rebates Program.
Sampling Methodology The 2018 BER sample covered 78 projects, with six projects being counted in more than one measure category. These visits were rolled out as a first sample of 47 and a second sample of 31. The plan for the first sample...
AI summary The 2018 BER sample included 78 projects, with two samples conducted in July and September 2018. The sampling methodology used tracked savings to determine sample sizes, focusing on lighting, motors and drives, and HVAC measures, which accounted for the majority of tracked savings.
On-site Visit Protocol The on-site visit protocol was only slightly modified from the 2017 BER protocol since eligible measures were similar. The main change for 2018 was adding columns to input the tracked values in addition to the values...
AI summary The on-site visit protocol for 2018 was slightly modified from the 2017 BER protocol, with added columns for tracked values and equipment age. The protocol includes general and measure-specific sections, with data collected from project documentation and on-site visits. Most fields were pre-filled based on ENS-provided information.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Commercial Dish Washers Quantity Installed: Location: Product type Manufacturer: Model number: Is the equipment used for commercial purpose? Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? High or...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and validation form for commercial energy equipment, including dish washers and fryers. It collects data on installation quantity, location, product type, manufacturer, model number, usage, and energy efficiency certification.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Validate the equipment is ENERGY STAR certified: Is the equipment still used? If not, why? Commercial Ice Makers Ice making head Location Quantity Installed: Product Type Manufacturer: Model number: Harves...
AI summary The text presents a tracking sheet for validating the use and certification status of commercial ice makers, including details on equipment type, manufacturer, model, and usage. The form asks whether the equipment is still in use and whether it replaces non-certified ENERGY STAR ice makers.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Steam Cookers Quantity Installed: Location: Manufacturer: Model number: Product Type: Operation Days/yr: Operation Hours/yr: Number of pans per unit: Number of pans per day: Explanation if different: Valid...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and validation form for energy-efficient equipment installations, including steam cookers, commercial convection ovens, and griddles. It collects details such as location, manufacturer, model numbers, usage data, and ENERGY STAR certification verification.
P7a. For what type of project did you purchase the majority of the [PRODUCT]? Was it for a… Type of Project – Contractors 2018 Sample Size 20 New construction 60% Replacement of existing fixtures or lamps 35% Don't know 5% Base: Contractor...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the types of projects for which the [PRODUCT] was purchased, distinguishing between contractors and end-users in 2018. Contractors primarily purchased the product for new construction (60%), while end-users mainly purchased it for replacing existing fixtures or lamps (80%).
Don't know/Refused excluded from calculations \ \ Base: Respondents who were aware of rebate and who had existing products that were working and not close to their useful life \ \ \ Base: Respondents who were aware of rebate and who purcha...
AI summary The text provides statistical bases for survey responses related to rebate awareness and product usage, excluding those who declined to answer or were unsure. It references specific conditions for inclusion in calculations and mentions ENS as the entity offering rebates.
- C1a. [ASK IF SALES DATA NON AVAILABLE] If the current trend is maintained, do you think you will sell more, less or the same number of LED linear lamps by the end of 2018 than the number of units you sold in 2017? If "more" or "less", ho...
AI summary The document asks whether the sales trend of LED linear lamps will continue in 2018 and whether the Business Energy Rebates Program's incentives influenced the number of lamps sold. It also explores factors such as market trends and competitor activity.
Commercial Lighting Measures Thirty-four (34) lighting projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 141 different commercial lighting measures. - › Adjustments were limited, resulting in adjustment ratios of 0.984 for tracked energy savings...
AI summary In 2018, 34 lighting projects were evaluated, with adjustments made to energy and demand savings due to outliers, data discrepancies, and errors. Adjustments included revising HOUs, efficient wattages, and addressing incompatible fixtures. Most metrics were tracked accurately, with high success rates for CF, IE/IEpd, and Wb.
Heating, Ventilation and Air-conditioning (HVAC) Measures Eleven (11) HVAC projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 20 different commercial HVAC measures. - › Adjustments were limited, with adjustment ratios of 0.990 for tracked energy...
AI summary In 2018, eleven HVAC projects were evaluated, with adjustments made to energy and peak demand savings ratios, the use of CIRx Screening Tool values, and AHRI performance ratings. Errors were identified and corrected in several projects, including the use of incorrect values and adjustments for product quantities and baseline conditions.
Commercial Refrigeration Measures Eight (8) refrigeration projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 24 different commercial refrigeration measures. - › Adjustments were required for all revised projects, resulting in adjustment ratios of...
AI summary In 2018, eight refrigeration projects with 24 commercial refrigeration measures were evaluated. Adjustments were made to energy and peak demand savings based on site data, with specific changes to motor and fan parameters. Adjustments were extrapolated due to high margins of error, and no on-site visits were conducted for data collection.
APPENDIX XII BER: MAIL-IN ALGORITHM FOR PARTICIPANT SPILLOVER CALCULATION Participant spillover for BER Mail-in was measured using a participant survey conducted during the on-site visits. Participants were asked whether, following their p...
AI summary This appendix describes the algorithm used to calculate participant spillover for the BER Mail-in program. It involves surveying participants to determine if they implemented additional energy efficiency measures after program participation and quantifying the program's influence on these decisions, which is then used to calculate the level of spillover.
Table 9: Recommended Values for Linear LED Fixtures Subcategory Lumens Output (lm) Baseline Wattage (W) Hours of Use 1,500 – 3,500 61.00 1 x 4 Luminaires ≥ 3,500 83.25 4,410 1,500 – 4,500 61.00 2 x 2 Luminaires & Retrofit Kits ≥ 4,500 84.0...
AI summary Table 9 provides recommended values for linear LED fixtures, including lumens output, baseline wattage, and hours of use for various subcategories. Efficient wattage is excluded as actual product wattages are used for Instant Rebates.
Recommended Savings The outdoor LED fixtures category contains outdoor wall-mounted area luminaires, as well as the architectural flood and spot luminaires subcategories with the majority of fixtures belonging to the latter. In 2018, ENS a...
AI summary The document discusses the outdoor LED fixtures category, including subcategories like wall-mounted area luminaires, architectural flood, and spot luminaires. ENS updated its service offer in 2018 to include non-cutoff and semi-cutoff wall-mounted area luminaires, previously covered only by the Mail-in program. Baseline wattages are based on 2017 recommended values and use a weighted average of metal halide and high-pressure sodium fixture wattages.
BER Instant Rebates – Participant Survey FR3. If your organization had not received the rebate and the cost for [PRODUCT] had been about $[REBATE AVERAGE VALUE BY CATEGORY] higher, would you have paid the full cost of the [PRODUCT]? (Scale...
AI summary The survey asks participants about their purchasing behavior regarding energy-efficient products, specifically focusing on whether they would have purchased the product at a higher cost without the BER rebate and whether they would have bought the same model of premium lighting products without the rebate.
Table 1: 2018 Overall Participation and Savings for Custom Incentives Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Custom Energy Savings 14.315 GWh 0.81 11.603 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 69 projects completed 196.661 GWh 0.79 156.07...
AI summary Table 1 presents 2018 participation levels and savings for custom incentives, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings across different programs such as Energy Savings, EMIS, and SEM. The table also includes metrics like NTGR and net savings for each category.
Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.681 GWh 1.681 GWh 1.00 1.681 GWh Evaluation Results 1.681 GWh 1.548 GWh 0.94 1.455 GWh Peak Demand Savings ENS Tracked Savings 0.000 MW 0.00...
AI summary The evaluated gross energy savings were 8% below tracked values due to incorrect tracking of savings from capital projects. An adjustment to savings from a lighting project installed through BER Instant Rebates caused net savings to be 13% lower than tracked savings.
Program Component 2017 2018 Program Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R C C Home Energy Assessment C C R Existing Residential Program Gree...
AI summary The table outlines program components and their process and impact evaluations for the years 2017 and 2018, highlighting initiatives such as appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and strategic energy management under residential and business programs.
Table 7: Implementation Status of the 2017 Recommendations for Custom 2017 Recommendations for Custom Status 2017 Custom-R1. Continue relying on BDMs to assist participants and find new markets. Implemented 2017 Custom-R2. Continue conduct...
AI summary The document outlines the implementation status of four 2017 recommendations for Custom. ENS has implemented or is in the process of implementing these recommendations, including collaboration with BDMs, expanding outreach, and improving energy model reviews.
4.1.2 Project Review Findings The 25 sampled projects were reasonably well documented and included some form of measurement and verification (M&V) documentation that defined how the savings were to be verified. A new QA workbook was implem...
AI summary The review of 25 sampled projects found that while documentation was generally good, adjustments were needed for energy and peak demand savings due to verification gaps, administrative errors, and incorrect calculations. The Evaluator recommended improvements to QA processes and M&V planning to increase accuracy. Adjustment ratios were calculated at 0.948 for energy and 0.825 for peak demand savings.
4.1.4 Effective Useful Life For each of the 25 sampled projects, the Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life (EUL) values based on the literature review performed in 2017 and on an analysis of each project baseline. The Evaluator foun...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed 25 projects to assess their effective useful life (EUL) values and found that 13 required adjustments due to incorrect categorization or dual-baseline issues. Adjustments resulted in a weighted average adjustment ratio of 0.940, and EULs for 2018 projects were reduced from 12.2 to 11.2 years.
4.1.5 Revised Gross Savings For projects that claimed partial savings over previous years and were completed in 2018, the Evaluator calculated a true-up adjustment. This true-up adjustment is added to the total adjusted gross savings claim...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of revised gross savings for energy efficiency projects, particularly those completed in 2018. A true-up adjustment is applied to projects that claimed partial savings over previous years, ensuring the total adjusted gross savings align with the total tracked project savings multiplied by an adjustment ratio.
Table 9: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Retrofit Partial Savings Final Savings for Projects Started and Completed in 2018 Final Savings for Multi-year Projects Total Number of Projects 9 44 14 67 Energy Savings Tracked Gr...
AI summary Table 9 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for retrofit projects, including data on the number of projects, energy savings tracked and adjusted at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings with adjustments. This data provides a comprehensive overview of energy efficiency outcomes from 2018 and multi-year projects.
5.4 Benefits of New Construction Many SPs indicated that New Construction provides their firm with benefits such as the ability to assist participants in designing a more energy efficient building. Additionally, one SP mentioned that the s...
AI summary New Construction programs provide benefits such as assisting in designing energy-efficient buildings, improving market awareness of efficiency, and helping participants forecast operating costs, showcase carbon reduction efforts, offset capital expenditures, and gain more information about building energy efficiency.
5.7 Process and Market Evaluation Summary The process and market evaluation indicated that there is room to improve awareness of and engagement with the service. While SPs reported mentioning ENS incentives in their communications, they re...
AI summary The process and market evaluation highlights the need for improved awareness and engagement with ENS incentives, particularly in New Construction projects. While SPs found ENS staff helpful, they reported challenges in understanding service requirements and timelines, which hinder participation. Improving communication and clarifying service steps are recommended.
6.1.1 Project Review Findings The on-site visits served to establish that all energy efficiency measures had been implemented in the four visited buildings. The project reviews and on-site visits revealed that reported savings calculations...
AI summary The project review found that energy savings calculations for four buildings were overestimated due to incorrect base case assumptions, mechanical system modelling inconsistencies, and incomplete commissioning. The largest adjustment was for a project with an ice rink and ventilation systems, where savings were reduced by 76%. Documentation was also incomplete for two projects, affecting the accuracy of energy models.
6.1.3 Effective Useful Life The Evaluator reviewed the EUL of the four sampled projects by selecting an appropriate EUL for each measure implemented in those projects. The measure-level revised EULs were selected based on the literature re...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of four sampled projects, establishing a weighted average revised EUL of 19.8 years. ENS tracked 20.1 years for these projects, but adjustments were only applied to the four reviewed projects due to a small sample size. The average EUL for 2018 projects was set at 18.5, while the tracked value of 11.4 years was conserved for a project claiming partial savings.
6.3 Net Savings For New Construction, the total net electrical energy and peak demand savings amounted to 1.500 GWh and 0.500 MW respectively at the generator. To calculate the avoided GHG emissions resulting from New Construction, the Eva...
AI summary The section discusses net savings from New Construction, including 1.500 GWh of electrical energy and 0.500 MW of peak demand savings. It calculates avoided GHG emissions using Nova Scotia's specific factor and estimates 835 tonnes of annual CO2 eq avoided. The net lifetime energy savings are 25.960 GWh, with a weighted average EUL value of 17.3 years.
8.1.3 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator reviewed the lifetime energy savings and corresponding EUL values used by ENS. The EUL of an implemented measure serves to calculate the energy savings achieved thro...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of effective useful life (EUL) values for energy efficiency measures in Building Optimization projects by ENS. It notes discrepancies between assigned EUL values and those recommended in a 2017 study, leading to a weighted average EUL of 6.7 years for 2018.
Table 16: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for Custom Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 16.416 GWh 16.416 GWh 0.91 14.944 GWh Evaluation Result...
AI summary Table 16 compares tracked and evaluated savings from Energy Nova Scotia (ENS) at the generator level for energy and peak demand. The table shows initial gross savings, adjusted gross savings, NTGR, and net savings for both energy and peak demand, highlighting differences between tracked and evaluated results.
11.1 Description EMIS offers incentives in the form of rebates or zero-percent on-bill financing to help facilities reduce their electricity consumption through the implementation of an energy management information system. First introduce...
AI summary EMIS provides rebates and zero-percent on-bill financing to help industrial businesses and institutions reduce electricity consumption through energy management information systems. The program, which became a stand-alone component of the Custom Incentives program in 2015, includes audits, implementation plans, and technical support. In 2018, EMIS aimed for 0.90 GWh in net electricity savings and 0.2 MW in net peak demand savings.
14.2.2 Interactive Effects The savings associated with EMIS are usually established based on the results of metered electrical energy consumption within a defined measurement boundary encompassing specific industrial processes. This was th...
AI summary The savings from the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) are measured based on metered electrical energy consumption within a defined boundary. The continuing participant's savings were not impacted by HVAC systems, while the new participant's savings from HVAC fan control measures were not adjusted for interactive effects due to the setup of air handling units.
14.4 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to EMIS. Since spillover and free-ridership effects were considered to be nil, the net program component impacts are equal to the gros...
AI summary Net savings from the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) are calculated as 1.616 GWh of electrical energy and 0.051 MW of peak demand, resulting in 990 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. The calculation uses a Nova Scotia-specific factor derived from 2017 data from Nova Scotia Power and Emera Inc.
ew of each regression workbook to verify that each of the four models were statistically significant and that any routine and non-routine adjustments needed to calculate 2018 savings had been applied. The tracked savings of all four partic...
AI summary The evaluation of energy savings from four participants in 2018 showed minimal adjustments, primarily due to discrepancies between tracked and reported savings. The Evaluator estimated peak demand savings as an average of energy savings, considering that most savings were driven by production levels and facilities operated during peak hours.
18.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to SEM. Since one project had some savings reported through SEM that resulted from participation in BER Instant Rebates, the Evaluator...
AI summary Net savings from the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program are calculated after adjusting for savings attributed to BER Instant Rebates, using a Non-Technology Grant Rate (NTGR) of 0.63. The adjusted energy savings amount to 88,701 Whk, with peak demand savings proportionally deducted. Total net savings are 1.455 GWh and 0.190 MW.
Using the Nova Scotia-specific factor23 for greenhouse gas emissions generated by electricity production, 0.6126 kg CO2 eq/kWh, it was estimated that the net energy savings resulted in 891 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. Based on an equ...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from the SEM program, using a Nova Scotia-specific factor to estimate avoided greenhouse gas emissions. It also notes a discrepancy in the NTGR value due to an adjustment for the BER Instant Rebates project, with a recommendation to use a NTGR of 1.00 in 2019.
Table 24: Comparison of SEM Total Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.681 GWh 1.681 GWh 1.00 1.681 GWh Evaluation Results 1.681 G...
AI summary The table compares energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENS and evaluated results. Evaluated gross energy savings were 8% lower than tracked due to incorrect tracking of savings from capital projects and adjustments made by the Evaluator after the tracking sheet was submitted. Net savings were 13% below tracked savings.
Table 25: 2018 Overall Participation and Savings for Custom Incentives Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Custom Energy Savings 14.315 GWh 0.81 11.603 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 69 projects completed 196.661 GWh 0.79 156.1...
AI summary Table 25 provides data on the 2018 participation levels and savings from custom incentives, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings across various programs such as EMIS and SEM. The data includes gross and net savings, as well as the NTGR factor applied.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The program financial incentives Response 97 N/A 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. The recommendations and technical assistance provided by the Business Development Manager or other ENS staff in selecting...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to energy efficiency programs and responses, including questions about financial incentives, technical assistance, and decision-making criteria such as payback period thresholds. The responses are categorized as N/A, Don't Know, or Refused.
Spillover - SO1. Since the time that you participated in the Custom Retrofit program, have you implemented some additional energy efficiency measures other than those implemented through the program? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [THANK AND...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to energy efficiency measures implemented by participants in the Custom Retrofit program, including whether additional measures were taken, financing or rebate requests, and detailed descriptions of the measures, their locations, and estimated savings.
8. Estimated Useful Life of the project Type of replacement If early replacement, indicate the remaining useful life of th ne equipment Observations that justify the type of replacement choice Main equipment considered in EUL calculation T...
AI summary The text provides a table related to the estimated useful life of a project and energy and demand savings adjustments. It includes fields for equipment replacement, energy savings, demand savings, and peak coincidence factor (PCF) adjustments. The table also includes notes on project status and adjustments made to energy and demand savings.
This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 EMIS and SEM evaluations, as well as all 2017 evaluation recommendations that were not fully implemented. Sections Recommendations SEM Net Savings 5...
AI summary This appendix summarizes recommendations from the 2018 EMIS and SEM evaluations, as well as unimplemented 2017 recommendations. It highlights that the NTGR for SEM net savings was adjusted due to the BER Instant Rebates project, and the Evaluator recommends using a NTGR of 1.00 for 2019 tracking.
SBES Performance SBES aimed to achieve 9.6 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.7 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that SBES achieved 9.589 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.44...
AI summary SBES achieved 9.589 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.441 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, contributing to 5,874 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided greenhouse gas emissions. A total of 529 projects were completed, a 30% increase from 2017, including four projects from the AMH pilot.
SBES Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed ENS gross savings estimates using the information contained in the tracking sheet, the CIRx Screening Tool, and findings from the on-site visits. Overall, this review found continued improvement i...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed ENS gross savings estimates for SBES Energy Savings, noting improvements in DIY project accuracy but significant adjustments due to inaccuracies in tracked HOUs and peak coincidence factors. Audit path savings were also adjusted due to various issues, leading to an overall adjustment ratio of 0.811. Free-ridership values from 2017 were reapplied in 2018, and spillover was found to be nil. Net energy and peak demand savings in 2018 were 9.589 GWh and 1.441 MW respectively.
4.1.2 Summary of Adjustments to Gross Savings – DIY Path Table 6 below summarizes the adjustment ratios used for all measure categories in the DIY path. The variations uncovered during site visits had a relatively small impact on energy sa...
AI summary The DIY path's gross savings adjustments are summarized, highlighting that variations found during site visits had a minimal impact on energy savings but a significant impact on demand savings. Incorrectly tracked peak coincidence factors in lighting projects due to incorrect HOUs led to a large adjustment ratio for peak demand savings.
4.1.5 Revised Gross Savings Table 7 and Table 8 further below present the revised total gross savings at the meter and at the generator for both paths. The savings at the generator were calculated by applying a line loss factor of 1.079 fo...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of revised gross savings for energy efficiency programs, including line loss factors applied to audit and DIY paths, and provides figures for energy and peak demand savings at the generator level for both paths, as well as lifetime energy savings and EUL values for SBES.
Revised Savings Calculation The revised savings calculations are based on two adjustments, and, as a result, the energy and demand savings have been impacted. The first adjustment made was the revision of the base case HVAC systems to thos...
AI summary The revised savings calculations involved two adjustments: revising the base case HVAC systems to reflect actual site conditions and correcting the Cooling Efficiency Factor. These changes impacted both energy and demand savings estimates. The baseline HSPF was updated, but the Coefficient of Performance at -15°C remained undetermined, leading to nil demand savings. The discrepancy in the Cooling Efficiency Factor value was not fully explained due to insufficient documentation.
EFFECTIVE USEFUL LIFE This appendix discusses the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the SBES program component. First, the EUL of lighting products is discussed and then, the EULs of the other types...
AI summary This appendix discusses the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the SBES program component, starting with lighting products and then covering other types of measures rebated through SBES.
Sections Recommendations 2017 Recommendations (Not fully implemented at the time of evaluation) 2. Investigate new ways to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures to increase their share of savings and ultimately increase SBE...
AI summary The 2017 recommendations highlight the need to encourage non-lighting energy efficiency measures within the SBES program, as lighting retrofits made up 82% of total savings. The Evaluator suggests exploring new marketing, educational materials, and additional support for participants to increase the variety of measures implemented and ensure continued program performance.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. Precision The extent to which repeated measurements agree with one another. Random sampling error The error in measurement due to the fact that measurements are...
AI summary The text provides definitions related to energy efficiency and statistical concepts, including terms like accuracy, precision, random sampling error, and tracked savings. It discusses how energy savings are calculated by ENS based on parameters such as participant numbers and unitary savings values.
Context and Background To improve the efficiency of energy-consuming products marketed in Canada, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has been implementing regulations regarding minimum energy efficiency standards (MEPS) by issuing a series o...
AI summary Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has implemented minimum energy efficiency standards (MEPS) through amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations as part of Canada's Clean Air Regulatory Agenda. Nova Scotia also adopted similar regulations, including LED lighting for roads and the Nova Scotia Building Code. Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) commissioned an evaluation of the energy and peak demand savings from these regulations in 2018.
Table 4: Methodology Used to Estimate Market Sizes Source for Estimating Total Shipments Sent to Canada or the Atlantic Region Method for Estimating Total Shipments Sent to Canada or the Atlantic Region Method for Estimating Shipments Sent...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the methodology used to estimate market sizes for various product categories in Nova Scotia. It includes sources such as industry associations, CMHC/StatCan, and Nova Scotia municipalities, along with methods like population ratio calculations and trade data analysis.
3.1.3 Market Size Estimate EFC provided information about lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to the end of 2018, and this information was converted into estimates for Nova Scotia. Of note, 2013 was the last year of shi...
AI summary EFC provided data on lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to 2018, which was used to estimate Nova Scotia's market size if energy efficiency standards had not been implemented. The Evaluator used 2013 as the baseline year and applied a -5.56% annual decline to project 2018 market size. The data also included estimated wattage distribution of lamps sold.
Table 13: Existing Lighting Unit Inventory in Nova Scotia, 2009 Type Energy Consumption Range for an Average Month (kWh/month) Proportion of Inventory Proportion of Total Power Consumed High-pressure sodium From 32 to 150 82% 73.5% Mercury...
AI summary Table 13 presents the existing lighting unit inventory in Nova Scotia in 2009, detailing the types of lighting units, their energy consumption ranges, and their proportion of the total inventory and power consumed. High-pressure sodium lamps dominate both in terms of inventory and power consumption.
per EnerGuide point at 1,521 kWh/year. Using the overestimation ratio of 16 percent resulting from the billing analysis, the final savings value per EnerGuide point was established at 1,278 kWh/year. The literature review conducted by the...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for residential buildings in Nova Scotia, considering the use of electricity as the primary heating source in new homes and the impact of building codes on compliance rates. It also references a survey by ENS and the application of an overestimation ratio from billing analysis.
In Amendment 13, NRCan specifies the average unitary savings values for Tier I and Tier II clothes washer categories according to their water heating sources, as listed in Table 28 below.56 Higherefficiency clothes washers use less water i...
AI summary Amendment 13 outlines average unitary savings values for Tier I and Tier II clothes washers based on water heating sources. Higher efficiency washers reduce water usage, leading to savings in domestic hot water heating, especially if electrically heated. The Evaluator used 2018 Instant Savings evaluation data to calculate a weighted average for Nova Scotia.
Table 36: Energy Savings Associated with Phasing Out Incandescent Light Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 (lamps) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/lamp) Energy Interactive...
AI summary Table 36 presents energy savings associated with phasing out incandescent light lamps in Nova Scotia, showing the number of lamps, annual energy savings, energy interactive effects factor, and total energy savings at the meter for different product classes in 2018.
Table 41: Fluorescent Lamp Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class NRCan Share of Class Shipments in 2017 Actual Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2018 (lamps) Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 25 W (standard-output) 37% 6,6...
AI summary Table 41 provides estimates of fluorescent lamp market size in Nova Scotia for 2018, categorized by product class, including residential and commercial/industrial (C&I) lamps, with data on shipments and NRCan share of class shipments in 2017.
3.6.5 Unitary Savings Values In Amendment 13, NRCan specifies the average unitary savings values listed in Table 43 for T5, T8 and T12 fluorescent lamps with a residential, commercial or industrial use.65 64 Natural Resources Canada. (2016...
AI summary Amendment 13 specifies average unitary savings values for T5, T8, and T12 fluorescent lamps across residential, commercial, and industrial uses, as outlined in Table 43 and referenced in a Natural Resources Canada cost-benefit analysis.
Table 43: Unitary Savings Values for Tier II General-service Fluorescent Lamps Product Class Unitary Savings Value (kWh) Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 26 W (standard-output) 0.2 Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 49 W (high-output...
AI summary Table 43 presents unitary savings values for Tier II general-service fluorescent lamps across various product classes and sizes, distinguishing between residential and commercial and industrial (C&I) categories. The values indicate energy savings in kWh for different lamp types and configurations.
Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of C&S, replacing lamps with more efficient products causes...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically focusing on how replacing lamps with more efficient products affects heating and cooling loads. The Evaluator used factors derived from past evaluations and onsite visits to calculate these effects for residential and commercial/industrial lamps, adjusting for factors like recessed fixtures.
3.7.3 Market Size Estimate EFC provided information about ballast product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to the end of 2018, and this information was converted into estimates for Nova Scotia based on population share. Since ballast...
AI summary EFC provided data on ballast shipments in Atlantic Canada from 2004 to 2018, which was used to estimate Nova Scotia's market size. Trends showed a decline in T12 ballast sales and an increase in T8 ballast sales until 2009, followed by a general decline until 2017. NRCan provided breakdowns of shipments by sector, and 2017 levels were used to project 2018 shipments assuming new standards had not been in force.
Table 49: Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class NRCan Share of Class Shipments in 2017 Actual Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2018 Com – 2 lamp med bi-pin (IS) 4-ft 84% 16,402 Ind – 2 lamp med bi-pi...
AI summary Table 49 presents market size estimates for fluorescent lamp ballast shipments in Nova Scotia in 2018, categorized by product class and usage (commercial, industrial, residential), with data on NRCan share of class shipments in 2017 and actual shipments in 2018.
Table 50: Estimated Portion of the Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Market Impacted by the Regulation Product Class Percentage of Total Projected Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 2018 Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the...
AI summary Table 50 provides an estimate of the portion of the fluorescent lamp ballast market in Nova Scotia impacted by a regulation in 2018, showing percentages of total projected shipments affected and the number of shipments for different product classes.
Table 52: Interactive Effects for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Product Class Energy Interactive Effects Factor Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Com – 2 lamp med bi-pin (IS) 4-ft -2.32% - Ind – 2 lamp med bi-pin (IS) 4-ft -2.32% - Res –...
AI summary Table 52 presents interactive effects for various fluorescent lamp ballasts, showing energy and peak demand effects for different product classes and usage categories (commercial, industrial, residential). The data indicates significant differences in impact across categories, particularly for residential applications.
Table 53: Energy Savings Associated with Phasing Out Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/unit) Interactive Effects Factor...
AI summary Table 53 details the energy savings associated with phasing out fluorescent lamp ballasts in Nova Scotia, categorized by product class and usage sector. The table includes shipments, annual energy savings per unit, interactive effects factors, and total energy savings in 2018, highlighting the impact of different lamp types and sectors.
3.8 Total Savings at the Generator Incremental annual energy savings at the meter were calculated by taking into account all product categories for which information about the market size, non-compliance rates, and unitary savings values w...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of incremental annual energy savings at the generator, taking into account transmission and distribution losses for different sectors. It also estimates the 2018 overall energy and peak demand savings for C&S and the corresponding avoided CO2 emissions based on Nova Scotia Power's 2017 data.
Table 55: Codes and Standards Overall Incremental Annual Energy and Peak Demand Savings, 2018 Pr du Ca t te o c g or y In de t ca n sc en La m p s D S L E t L tre e ig h in t g Ne w Bu i l d in g s ( Ho d us es a n Sm l l a i in ) Bu l d g...
AI summary Table 55 provides incremental annual energy and peak demand savings from codes and standards in 2018, including data for different lighting technologies and building types. The table includes metrics for various lamp types and building categories, such as new buildings and large buildings.
3.9 Recommendations International experience and the Evaluator's own experience suggest that evaluating the energy impact of regulations or policies is usually more difficult than calculating the impacts of DSM programs that have lists of...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends removing houses, small buildings, and incandescent lamps from the scope of the 2019 C&S evaluation due to negligible energy impact and existing reporting on past regulations. Large buildings, condos, and apartments with updated energy codes should remain in the evaluation scope.
78612Compliance Filing
34 passages
14 15 16 17 Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. 18 19 b TRC is a benefit/co...
AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity provided by NS Power from the 2014 IRP, as well as benefit/cost ratios (TRC and PAC) used to evaluate EfficiencyOne's programs, including participation by low-income customers and specific rebate programs.
1 Table 4: 2021 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Pr...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the 2021 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, showing detailed breakdowns of residential and business programs, including investment amounts, energy savings, and cost tests like TRC and PAC. The data highlights the financial and energy benefits of various demand-side management initiatives.
1 Table 5: 2022 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Pr...
AI summary Table 5 presents the 2022 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including residential and business programs, with details on energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost tests such as TRC and PAC.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expres...
AI summary The document discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity provided by NS Power, referencing the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2018 transmission and distribution costs. It explains how lifetime benefits are calculated using net present value and introduces TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios. It also notes the focus on low-income customer participation in EfficiencyOne programs.
1 3. 2020-2022 DSM RESOURCE PLAN 2 3 The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan represents a comprehensive suite of programs and 4 service offerings for Nova Scotia electricity customers. The main goal of each program 5 is to help reduce electricity...
AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan outlines a suite of programs aimed at reducing electricity costs for consumers in Nova Scotia. The plan highlights energy savings, CO2 reductions, and system benefits, with EfficiencyOne investing $110 million to achieve significant energy and demand savings.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Portfolio total cost-effectiveness test...
AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from NS Power's 2014 IRP and provides data on CO 2 reductions from the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan. It also outlines cost-effectiveness tests and program investment budgets for 2020-2022, referencing TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios.
Table 3: 2020 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Prog...
AI summary Table 3 provides an overview of the 2020 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, detailing investments, savings, and costs for residential and business programs. It highlights the financial and energy benefits of various DSM initiatives, including energy savings, peak demand reductions, and cost metrics like TRC and PAC.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. & lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expres...
AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from the 2014 IRP, provided by NS Power, and explains metrics like TRC and PAC, which compare lifetime benefits to program costs. It also references EfficiencyOne's planned participation by low-income customers.
Table 4: 2021 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Prog...
AI summary Table 4 presents the 2021 investment and savings data for Demand Side Management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia, detailing residential and business programs, including energy savings, cost tests, and total resource costs.
Table 5: 2022 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Prog...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2022 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including residential and business programs, with details on investment amounts, energy savings, and cost tests. It provides a breakdown of various DSM initiatives and their associated benefits.
Table 11: 2020-2022 New Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Test...
AI summary Table 11 presents performance indicators for new residential energy efficiency programs from 2020 to 2022, including investment, energy savings, cost-effectiveness ratios, and participation levels. The data shows a steady increase in investment, energy savings, and participation over the three years.
Table 13: 2020-2022 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administra...
AI summary Table 13 presents performance indicators for BNI Efficient Product Rebates from 2020 to 2022, including investment amounts, energy savings, cost-effectiveness ratios, and participation numbers. The data highlights trends in energy savings and cost efficiency over the three-year period.
Table 15: 2020-2022 Custom Incentives Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Tes...
AI summary Table 15 presents performance indicators for custom incentives from 2020 to 2022, including investment amounts, energy savings, peak demand reductions, and cost metrics. The data show consistent growth in investment and energy savings over the three years, with total investment reaching $21.2 million and cumulative energy savings of 1,233.2 GWh.
Table 2: 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted- Average Measure Life (years) Peak Demand Saving...
AI summary Table 2 outlines the investment and savings from the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, including annual investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests. The data shows increasing investments and savings over the three years, with a focus on energy efficiency and demand management.
Table 3: 2020 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Prog...
AI summary Table 3 presents the 2020 investment and savings data for Demand Side Management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia, including details on energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost tests. The table highlights the financial and energy benefits of various residential and business programs.
Table 3: 2020 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2020 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...
AI summary Table 3 outlines the 2020 investment and savings from the Preferred DSM Resource Plan, detailing program-specific investments, energy savings, and cost tests. It provides data on residential and non-residential programs, including efficient product rebates, direct installation, and enabling strategies.
Table 4: 2021 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Prog...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the 2021 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan Investment and Savings, detailing investments, benefits, energy savings, and cost tests for various residential and business programs. It includes data on energy savings, peak demand reduction, and cost evaluations like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).
Table 4: 2021 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2021 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...
AI summary Table 4 presents the 2021 Preferred DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, showing the investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests for various demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia. The data includes both residential and business programs, as well as enabling strategies.
Table 5: 2022 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Prog...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2022 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing program investments, energy savings, and cost tests for residential, business, and enabling strategies programs. It provides data on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and peak demand reductions across various DSM initiatives.
Table 5: 2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2022 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (T...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2022 Preferred DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings, detailing investments, benefits, and savings across residential, business, and enabling strategies programs. The table highlights energy savings, peak demand reductions, and cost tests such as TRC and PAC.
Table 7: 2020-2022 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Adm...
AI summary Table 7 presents performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program from 2020 to 2022, including investment amounts, energy savings, and cost metrics such as the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC).
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Total cost-effectiveness tests are calc...
AI summary The text provides details on avoided costs of energy and capacity from 2014 and transmission and distribution costs from 2018. It also explains cost-effectiveness tests, including TRC and PAC, and defines terms like levelized cost of saved energy and nominal cost of saved energy.
Table 7: 2020-2022 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Adm...
AI summary Table 7 presents performance indicators for residential efficient product rebates from 2020 to 2022, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost metrics such as the Total Resource Cost Test and Program Administrator Cost Test. The data shows trends in participation and cost efficiency over the three-year period.
11 Table 8: 2020-2022 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Low-Income 12 Performance Indicators Year First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Participation (units)a 2020 0.4 2.7 0.04 1,996 202...
AI summary Table 8 presents performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Low-Income program from 2020 to 2022, showing energy savings, peak demand savings, and participation numbers over the three years.
33 Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) b Participation (products) c Participation (homes)...
AI summary The table presents energy efficiency program performance metrics from 2020 to 2022, including investments, energy savings, participation numbers, and cost metrics. It highlights increasing investments and energy savings over the years, along with consistent cost metrics.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Total cost-effectiveness tests are calc...
AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from NS Power's 2014 IRP and 2018 transmission and distribution costs. It also outlines cost-effectiveness tests, including TRC and PAC ratios, and explains metrics like levelized and nominal costs of saved energy.
Alternate Plans Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) b Participation (homes) c Le...
AI summary The document presents a comparison of alternate plans for energy efficiency programs, including investment amounts, energy savings, participation numbers, and cost metrics. The preferred plan and alternate plan are compared across multiple years, with variance percentages indicating differences between the two scenarios.
3 Table 12: Preferred PlanDSM Resource Plan: BNI Sector Offerings Program Program Target Market Delivery Enhancements Component Segment Approach in 2020-2022 Custom Custom Existing and new Facilitated and New system • Incentives constructi...
AI summary Table 12 outlines the BNI sector offerings under the Preferred PlanDSM Resource Plan, detailing various programs, target markets, delivery methods, and enhancements aimed at promoting energy efficiency and demand-side management in the Business, Industrial, and Non-Industrial sectors.
Table 13: 2020-2022 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administra...
AI summary Table 13 presents performance indicators for the BNI Efficient Product Rebates program from 2020 to 2022, including investments, energy savings, cost metrics, and participation levels. The data highlights consistent energy savings and cost efficiency over the three-year period.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Total cost-effectiveness tests are calc...
AI summary The text discusses annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from the 2014 IRP, as well as avoided costs of transmission and distribution from 2018. It outlines methods for calculating cost-effectiveness tests and defines key terms like TRC and PAC, which are benefit/cost ratios used in evaluating energy efficiency programs.
Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity were provided by NS Power, from the 2014 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2018. Total cost-effectiveness tests are calc...
AI summary The document provides information on annual avoided costs of energy and capacity from the 2014 IRP, along with details on cost-effectiveness tests and definitions of TRC and PAC. It includes data on the number of projects supported through the Custom program component and participation in EMIS and SEM. The document also contains dates and page numbers.
Table 19: 2020-2022 Custom Incentives Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Tes...
AI summary Table 19 presents performance indicators for custom incentives from 2020 to 2022, showing energy savings, investment, and cost metrics. The data highlights consistent energy savings and participation levels over the years, with slight increases in investment and savings, and stable cost metrics.
2223 & lt;sup>b PAC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to EfficiencyOne's costs. & lt;sup>e- The number of projects supported through the Custom program component (includes Custom Retrofit, BNI New Construction, and Buildi...
AI summary The text discusses metrics related to energy efficiency programs, including the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) benefit/cost ratio, the number of projects supported through the Custom program component, the number of companies participating in Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS) and Strategic Energy Management (SEM), and the levelized and nominal costs of saved energy.
1 SCHEDULE A 2 3 ELECTRICITY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 4 Schedule A 5 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities 7 The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3 year Cumulative Annual Energy 8 Savings and,Cumulat...
AI summary Schedule A outlines the scope of savings from Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECAs) over a three-year term, including cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings, as well as lifetime energy savings.