Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M10473

3.1 SUMMARY - The Settlement Plan represents a comprehensive suite of programs and service offerings which will - deliver approximately 412.7 GWh of affordable, incremental net energy savings and 96.7 MW (78.8 MW - from energy efficiency a...

AI summary The Settlement Plan delivers 412.7 GWh of energy savings and 96.7 MW of demand reduction, aligning with the 2020 IRP's DSM spending levels. It proposes a $173M investment (vs. $188M in the IRP) over 2023-2025, with a lifetime unit cost of $0.035/kWh. Past DSM programs have already saved ratepayers $1.5B.

Figure 2: 2021-2025 Energy Efficiency Investment (Settlement Plan) compared to 2020 IRP Reference Plan - 2 2021 tracked results and 2022 planned targets and spending were used for E1 Planned Results. - With a DSM investment of approximatel...

AI summary Figure 2 compares the 2021-2025 Energy Efficiency Investment Settlement Plan to the 2020 IRP Reference Plan. The Settlement Plan, with $58 million annual DSM investment, projects $543 million in lifetime ratepayer benefits, emphasizing energy efficiency as a key strategy.

13 Table 2: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Cost-Effectiveness Results by Program 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Total Resource Cost (TRC) Testa Program Administrator Cost (PAC) Testb Residential Energy Efficiency (EE) Programs Efficient Product Reba...

AI summary Table 2 presents the cost-effectiveness results of various energy efficiency and demand response programs under the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan. The data includes Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests for different sectors, such as residential, business, and non-profit, with overall results indicating varying levels of cost-effectiveness across programs.

5. AVOIDED COSTS In calculating the benefits and cost effectiveness of the energy efficiency portfolio, E1 incorporated the avoided costs of energy, capacity, transmission, distribution and carbon. E1 used the avoided costs of capacity and...

AI summary E1 calculates avoided costs for energy efficiency programs using NS Power's 2020 IRP and historical data. E1 argues that Scenario 3.1C from the 2020 IRP is more appropriate for assessing the Settlement Plan due to its alignment with coal plant retirement timelines, the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act, and renewable energy standards.

DSM ENERGY SAVINGS - NS Power modelled various reference scenarios in the development of the IRP and selected Reference - Plan 2.0C as the scenario which will deliver the lowest net revenue requirements to the NS Power - electricity system...

AI summary The document discusses the development of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and its impact on energy savings targets and avoided costs. E1 argues that the Settlement Plan better reflects recent climate initiatives and legislation, providing a more accurate assessment of avoided costs and energy savings compared to the IRP Reference Plan 2.0C.

BALANCING SHORT- AND LONG-TERM AFFORDABILITY The Settlement Plan seeks to maximize value for ratepayers by balancing short- and long-term affordability. This is accomplished through a DSM Plan that incorporates the needs and best interests...

AI summary The Settlement Plan aims to balance short- and long-term affordability for ratepayers by emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of Demand Side Management (DSM) over fuel alternatives. DSM is shown to be significantly cheaper than fuel, leading to substantial fuel savings. The plan aligns with legislative requirements and considers the best interests of customers.

7.4 DSM SPENDING SHOULD ECLIPSE A MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF UTILITY REVENUE This 2020 Utility Energy Efficiency Scorecard also provides data pertaining to the amount of energy efficiency spending relative to a given utility's total revenue[31]...

AI summary The document argues that Nova Scotia's Demand Side Management (DSM) spending should exceed a minimum percentage of utility revenue, referencing data from the 2020 Utility Energy Efficiency Scorecard. It highlights that leading U.S. states like Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine spent significantly higher percentages of their revenue on energy efficiency programs compared to Nova Scotia.

7.5 DSM IN NOVA SCOTIA TRAILS INVESTMENT LEVELS OF LEADING AMERICAN JURISDICTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF REVENUE In 2020, Nova Scotia ratepayers spent approximately $1.5 billion on electricity. However, in contrast to leading American jurisdic...

AI summary In 2020 and 2021, Nova Scotia's investment in Demand Side Management (DSM) as a percentage of total electricity revenue was significantly lower than in leading American jurisdictions. The Settlement Plan proposes increasing this to 3.5% by 2023, which E1 considers reasonable, though still below the average of major U.S. utilities.

CARBON - For the Settlement Plan, it remains E1's position that it is reasonable to assign a value to carbon and - related pricing avoidance. With this in mind, E1 determined the avoided costs of carbon for the purposes - of the Settlement...

AI summary E1 argues that assigning a value to carbon and related pricing avoidance is reasonable for the Settlement Plan, using the federal carbon pricing trajectory to assess affordability. The discussion also references legislative goals under the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act, emphasizing energy efficiency and equitable access for low-income and marginalized communities.

E1's RBIA for 2023-2025 indicates that DSM, and specifically its energy efficiency portfolio, is the only resource option available to ratepayers that generates true bill savings. Expanding DSM through increased investment under the Settle...

AI summary E1's RBIA for 2023-2025 highlights that DSM, especially energy efficiency programs, is the only resource option that provides true bill savings for ratepayers. Expanding DSM through the Settlement Plan will enhance overall bill savings, with the long-term benefits outweighing any potential rate increases.

8.6 ENERGY EFFICIENCY IS THE LEAST RISK OPTION - 18 Energy efficiency is a low-risk energy investment as there is: - Certainty with respect to the level in investment; - No unexpected costs associated with an investment in energy efficienc...

AI summary Energy efficiency is presented as the least risky investment option due to its predictable costs, capped spending, and consistent program performance. Unlike other fuel sources, it avoids unexpected costs and volatility, ensuring ratepayer stability. E1's consistent administration of efficiency programs further supports this claim.

11.1 PERFORMANCE TARGETS IN THE SETTLEMENT PLAN - The Settlement Plan sets a target for cumulative annual energy savings of 412.7 GWh and cumulative - annual peak demand savings of 78.8 MW. The Supply Agreement defines them as:

AI summary The Settlement Plan sets performance targets for cumulative annual energy savings of 412.7 GWh and cumulative annual peak demand savings of 78.8 MW, as defined by the Supply Agreement.

ver $130 million in annual electricity costs (accounting for DSM cost recovery)[1](#page-98-1) and over 775 kilotonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually through a variety of programs and services. E1's Settlement Plan is an investment o...

AI summary E1's Settlement Plan invests $173 million in energy efficiency and demand response, delivering $543 million in lifetime benefits. Over the past decade, DSM in Nova Scotia has provided benefits exceeding utility investment by more than 4 to 1. The plan addresses market evolution and increasing unit costs as low-cost opportunities diminish.

1.1.2 LEGISLATED CLIMATE CHANGE GOALS Climate change policy and goals are evolving quickly and have shifted even throughout the development of the Settlement Plan. In October and November 2021, the United Nations Climate Change Conference...

AI summary The text discusses the evolving climate change goals and policies, including federal and provincial commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and achieve net zero by 2050. It highlights the role of DSM in contributing to Nova Scotia's clean energy transformation and mentions the need to align the IRP Evergreen Process with recent environmental goals.

8 2.1.3 CUSTOMER INSIGHTS - 9 As part of the development of its Settlement Plan, E1 commissioned Narrative Research to undertake a - 10 quantitative research study to assess perceptions on a variety of topics related to energy efficiency a...

AI summary E1 commissioned a survey to gather insights on energy efficiency perceptions in Nova Scotia. The survey found that while most Nova Scotians are aware of E1's brand, there is a need to improve awareness and uptake of its Energy Solutions Advisor services. Cost was identified as a major barrier to participation, and Nova Scotians recognized the importance of funding DSM initiatives for climate action and energy conservation.

14 Table 3: Balanced Plan Aspects Addressed in the Settlement Plan Balanced Plan Aspects 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Short- and long-term energy and capacity avoidance • resource acquisition (measures with a diversity of short- and long-term...

AI summary Table 3 outlines aspects of the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan, including energy and capacity avoidance, program delivery costs, avoided investments, and non-electric benefits. It highlights strategies for managing costs, incentive setting, and incorporating customer perception into measure mix decisions.

- 3 objectives were applied to the Settlement Plan: - 4 investment in low-income (LI): 17% to 22% of total energy efficiency portfolio investment; - 5 investment split: 50% Residential (Res) and 50% BNI programs; and 1 • energy savings spl...

AI summary The Settlement Plan includes three objectives, with a focus on low-income investment, residential and BNI program splits, and energy savings distribution. Table 4 outlines key global assumptions for the plan, differentiating model inputs for EE, DR, and both.

7 Table 4: Key Global Assumptions in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development Key Global Assumptions Model ITEM DESCRIPTION OF MODEL INPUTS & ASSUMPTIONS EE DR Incentive thresholds contained in the Incentive Setting Methodology, as accept...

AI summary The document outlines key global assumptions in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development, including incentive thresholds and the development of DR incentives based on updated information and pilot insights.

8 distribution infrastructure. [Figure 11,](#page-135-1) below, provides highlights of the Settlement Plan. Carbon Emissions Avoided First-Year CO2e Savings (kt) 326 Lifetime CO2e Savings (kt) 1,742 Portfolio Summary (2023-2025) First-Year...

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines carbon emissions avoided and energy savings from a portfolio of initiatives between 2023-2025. It includes details on energy and demand savings, investment allocations, and cost-effectiveness metrics, with a focus on low-income participation and the split of energy efficiency and demand response investments between residential and business sectors.

3.1 SETTLEMENT PLAN - SAVINGS & INVESTMENT 10 In 2023-2025, E1 will invest $173.0 million (in nominal dollars) to achieve 412.7 GWh of incremental cumulative net energy savings, 96.7 MW of cumulative system-peak demand savings (inclusive o...

AI summary In 2023-2025, E1 plans to invest $173.0 million to achieve significant energy savings, including 412.7 GWh of incremental cumulative net energy savings and 96.7 MW of system-peak demand savings. Table 8 outlines the investment budgets and targets for the 14 planned programs in the portfolio.

1 Table 9: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023-2025 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW)...

AI summary Table 9 outlines the investment and savings from the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan, detailing energy efficiency and demand response programs. It includes program components such as residential and business energy efficiency, enabling strategies, and demand response, with metrics like investment amounts, energy savings, and cost-effectiveness.

12 13 Table 10: 2023 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity Cost Te esource st (TRC)...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing the 2023 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings by Program Component, including residential and business energy efficiency programs, enabling strategies, and demand response initiatives. It outlines investments, energy savings, and cost considerations for various programs across Nova Scotia.

Table 11: 2024 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2024 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available D...

AI summary Table 11 outlines the 2024 Settlement Plan investment and savings by program component, including residential and business energy efficiency programs, enabling strategies, and demand response initiatives. It provides data on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and administrative costs.

11 Table 12: 2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component Lifetime First-Year Lifetime Peak EE Available esource gram rator Cost 2025 Investment Benefits b Energy Energy Demand DR Cost Tes st (TRC) c Test (PAC) d ($ mi...

AI summary Table 12 outlines the 2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings by Program Component, detailing investments, benefits, energy savings, and demand reductions for various energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia, including residential, business, and enabling strategies.

21 Table 14: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Cost Effectiveness Results by Program 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Total Resource Cost (TRC) Testa Program Administrator Cost (PAC) Testb Residential Energy Efficiency (EE) Programs Efficient Product Reb...

AI summary Table 14 presents the cost-effectiveness results of the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan by program, including residential and business energy efficiency initiatives. Key observations highlight the performance of various programs under the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests.

10 4.1.1 OBJECTIVES 1 2 3 8 9 11 Objectives of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program include: DATE FILED: 11 March 2022 - 1 make energy-efficient products more accessible to Nova Scotians across all income levels and 2 geograph...

AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program aims to increase access to energy-efficient products for all Nova Scotians, raise awareness of energy efficiency benefits, boost market participation, and remove inefficient appliances from the electricity system, ultimately helping customers reduce their energy bills.

Table 20: 2023-2025 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Re esource st (TRC) a Admin gram strator st (PAC) b Participation...

AI summary Table 20 outlines the performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program from 2023 to 2025, including investment amounts, energy savings, demand savings, and participation numbers, with a focus on cost and resource metrics.

18 Table 22: 2023-2025 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Cost...

AI summary The table compares performance indicators for the 2023-2025 Residential Efficient Product Rebates under the Settlement Plan and an Alternate Scenario, showing metrics such as investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost metrics, with no variance noted in most categories.

Table 31: 2023-2025 Existing Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Cost Tes esource st (TRC) a Admin Cost Te gram istrator st (PAC) b Participation (homes)...

AI summary Table 31 presents residential performance indicators for the years 2023 to 2025, including investment, energy savings, cost metrics, and participation data. The table highlights trends in energy savings, costs, and the number of homes and projects involved in demand-side management initiatives.

2 Scenario Scenario Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Re Cost Tes esource st (TRC) a Admin gram istrator st (PAC) b Participation Participation Participation Lifetime Unit Cost ($ m...

AI summary The table presents two scenarios (Settlement and Alternate) with investment, energy savings, and cost details for different years. It includes metrics such as energy savings, participation numbers, and unit costs. The variance between the scenarios is also outlined in percentage terms.

Table 34: Three-Year Summary of the New Home Construction Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (homes) 2023 Total 0.8 0.4 1.3 419 2024 Total n/a n/a n/a n/a 2025 Total n/a n/a...

AI summary Table 34 provides a three-year summary of the New Home Construction Program Component, showing investment, energy savings, demand savings, and participation from 2023 to 2025. Data for 2024 and 2025 is not available, and the document references Attachment 4 for more details.

17 Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings esource st (TRC) a Admin gram istrator st (PAC) b excl. Participation Lifetime Unit ($ 1111111011) (GWh) (GWh) (MW) Carb...

AI summary The document presents a table outlining various scenarios with investment amounts, energy savings, and cost metrics over multiple years. It includes data on carbon emissions, administrative costs, and participation metrics for different programs, highlighting variations between scenarios and settlement totals.

• utility bill savings and improved building comfort • reduced maintenance and extended equipment life • access to energy expertise through funded studies and on-site energy manager support • improved control over buildings and industrial...

AI summary The table outlines the benefits of the Building and Neighborhood Initiative (BNI) custom incentives, including utility bill savings, improved building comfort, reduced maintenance, and environmental benefits such as reduced GHG emissions. It also highlights market transformation, relationship building, and support for innovative projects.

21 Table 45: Three-Year Summary of the Custom Program Component Annual Plan Investment Energy Savings Demand Savings Participation Measures Promoted A variety of technical and financial assistance is available through the program, which is...

AI summary The Custom Program Component provides a variety of technical and financial assistance to support energy efficiency and system-peak demand reduction projects. Key areas of support include financial incentives for feasibility studies, energy modelling, and implementing energy efficiency upgrades, as well as assistance for compressed air systems and building performance optimization.

22 Table 46: Three-Year Summary of the SEM & EMIS Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (participants) Key Components • Assisting large and mid-sized industrial companies devel...

AI summary This table outlines the three-year summary of the SEM & EMIS Program Component, focusing on assisting industrial companies with energy management systems, providing tools for energy management, and supporting energy efficiency projects in Nova Scotia.

5.2.3.1 PROGRAM DELIVERY - The Custom Incentives program structure is designed to overcome customer barriers associated with large - upfront costs, lack of in-house capacity and business case requirements. The program is delivered through...

AI summary The Custom Incentives program is structured to help customers overcome barriers to energy efficiency by providing financial and technical support. It involves multiple service components like Retrofit, NC, BOpt, EMIS, and SEM, each with different processes, incentives, and target markets. External consultants and service providers are engaged to deliver these services, ensuring compliance with industry standards and program goals.

1 Table 51: 2023-2025 Direct Installation Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings Energy Energy Savings Savings Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Cost Test (PAC) Participation (products) c Lifetime Unit...

AI summary Table 51 outlines performance indicators for the Direct Installation program from 2023 to 2025, including investment amounts, energy savings, and cost metrics. It provides data on energy savings, total resource cost, participant cost, and participation levels over the three-year period.

1 Table 53: Direct Installation Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total...

AI summary Table 53 compares performance indicators for the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario in the Direct Installation Program. It includes metrics such as investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs across different years and scenarios. The table highlights the differences between the two scenarios and provides a variance analysis.

ehouse. The DR Roadmap provides additional implementation details and considers how DR can ramp over the period 2021-2030. The DR Roadmap has been included as Attachment 5 – Demand Response Roadmap. E1's DSM Plan proposes expanding the dir...

AI summary The document discusses E1's Demand Response (DR) Roadmap and expansion of DR pathways, including behavioural DR, electric vehicle charging, and behind-the-meter battery. It highlights the inclusion of these new pathways to test technologies and delivery approaches, and to provide customers with more choices. The DR Roadmap and related studies are referenced, along with regulatory actions and legislation.

Item Description Eligible Customers • Interruptible Rider • Large C&I Program Enrollment Assumptions • Enrollment varies by customer segment (business type) and ranges from 5% to 50% of total eligible customers/load. These percentages repr...

AI summary The document outlines the parameters and assumptions for a demand-side management program, including eligible customers, enrollment rates, event timing, notification methods, and incentives. It projects a 9 MW peak load reduction in 2025 with estimated program costs of approximately $3.3 million for the 2023-2025 period.

Table 23. BNI EE-DR Integration Considerations EE Program EE Program Component EE-DR Measure for Integration Corresponding DR Option for Integration Considerations Brief Description of EE-DR Integration Approach Efficient Product Business...

AI summary Table 23 outlines the integration of energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) measures under the BNI program. It details how smart thermostats can be used for both EE and DR purposes, with E1 offering rebates and additional incentives for DR participation through the DLC-BYOT option.

he avoided costs from the 2014 IRP, used for the 2020 RBIA. In addition, NS Power also made improvements to the NS Power Rate Model by incorporating transfer tables and cost allocation summary tables. - Since the filing of E1's 2021 RBIA o...

AI summary The 2023-2025 DSM Plan RBIA incorporates avoided costs of carbon, demand response components, and partial year measure lives. It highlights that DSM programs will save Nova Scotian ratepayers $0.4 billion through energy and demand reductions, with average bill reductions ranging from 1.2% to 7.9% depending on participant type.

4 Table 6: Full Range of Avoided Cost Values Used for This Analysis Category Years Details Capacity ($/kW-year) 2023-2040 • Fitted series PRM adjusted stream (AVC 2.0C NPV 2023) of avoided costs of capacity, as calculated by NS Power for t...

AI summary Table 6 presents avoided cost values for capacity, transmission, distribution, energy, and carbon from 2023 to 2040. These values are derived from NS Power's calculations for the IRP Reference Plan and include inflation adjustments and carbon pricing trajectories.

4.9 DEMAND RESPONSE - This section discusses how demand response has been incorporated into the E1 RBIA model and NS Power - Rate Model. - Demand Response costs, savings, measure life, and customer incentives are first calculated and provi...

AI summary The document discusses the integration of demand response into the E1 RBIA model and NS Power Rate Model. Demand response is modeled separately from energy efficiency, allowing for multiple scenarios, such as 'no DSM,' 'energy efficiency without demand response,' and 'demand response without energy efficiency.' Demand response is assumed to have no energy savings, only demand savings, and is modeled with a one-year measure life.

5.2 OVERALL BILL IMPACTS Generally speaking, ratepayers that participate in DSM programs directly benefit by reducing their electricity consumption and thereby lowering their electricity bills. Together, the level of reduced consumption (o...

AI summary The 2023-2025 DSM Settlement Plan RBIA shows that DSM programs reduce electricity bills for participants by -7.9 to -1.2 percent and benefit all ratepayers with $0.4 billion in savings. Non-participants also see slight savings, while the overall impact ranges from -4.0 to -1.0 percent. The savings are attributed to reduced consumption and revenue requirements.

Business, Non-Profit and Institutional Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates (BER-IR) Assumptions: - For high-consumption rate classes (Large General, Medium Industrial, Large Industrial, and Municipal), assume that each account partic...

AI summary The document outlines assumptions for participation rates in the Business, Non-Profit and Institutional Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates (BER-IR) program. It provides participation rates for different rate classes, including high-consumption and low-consumption categories, and explains how historical participation data was estimated using a shape factor and re-participation rate assumptions.

Comments The applied process is a simplification of a more elaborate cost allocation process where some FAM costs, such as fuel costs, are allocated to rate classes based on their shares in monthly energy requirements; some other FAM costs...

AI summary The text discusses a simplified cost allocation process for FAM and non-FAM costs across rate classes, using factors like monthly and annual energy requirements and system peaks. It outlines how annual non-FAM costs are calculated and prorated across different functional areas and rate classes, with adjustments for inflation from 2023 to 2035.

1. 2023-2025 ALTERNATE SCENARIO - Like the Settlement Plan, E1's key global assumptions and design objectives for the Alternate Scenario align - with E1's DSM Plan Guiding Principles and the Standardized Filing Framework (SFF). With the Ba...

AI summary The 2023-2025 Alternate Scenario aligns with E1's DSM Plan Guiding Principles and the Standardized Filing Framework. It includes investment targets, energy savings, and demand reductions, with a focus on low-income investments and a balanced split between residential and BNI programs.

DATE FILED: 11 March 2022 Page 1 of 8 1 Figure 1: 2023-2025 Alternate Scenario – Portfolio-level Insights Carbon Emissions Avoided First-Year CO2e Savings (kt) 299 Lifetime CO2e Savings (kt) 1,658 Portfolio Summary (2023-2025) First-Year E...

AI summary The document presents a 2023-2025 alternate scenario with insights on energy and demand savings, carbon emissions avoided, and investment breakdowns. It highlights the distribution of energy efficiency and demand response investments between residential and business sectors, along with cost and benefit analyses.

Table 2: 2023-2025 Alternate Scenario Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023-2025 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Cap...

AI summary Table 2 outlines investment and savings for energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia from 2023 to 2025. It details program components, including residential and business initiatives, along with their associated investment costs, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and demand savings.

1 Table 3: 2023 Alternate Scenario Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Availab...

AI summary Table 3 presents investment and savings data for various energy efficiency and demand response programs in 2023, including residential and business initiatives, with details on costs, benefits, and energy savings.

1 Table 4: 2024 Alternate Scenario Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2024 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Availab...

AI summary Table 4 presents investment and savings data for energy efficiency and demand response programs in 2024, including details on residential and business programs, enabling strategies, and overall portfolio performance. The data highlights investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and other metrics for various program components.

1 Table 5: 2025 Alternate Scenario Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2025 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Availab...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2025 Alternate Scenario Investment and Savings for various energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia. It provides data on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and other metrics for residential, business, and institutional programs.

7 Q. IS EFFICIENCYONE'S TRC TEST FORMULATION CONSISTENT 8 WITH STANDARD PRACTICES? 9 A. Yes. EfficiencyOne's TRC test includes all appropriate benefits and costs. 10 EfficiencyOne's avoided cost benefit categories include electric energy,...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's TRC test formulation is consistent with standard practices as it includes all appropriate benefits and costs, such as avoided costs and incremental measure costs. It aligns with the National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) guidelines and uses the Federal trajectory of the cost of carbon and data from Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to calculate carbon benefits.

6 Q. IS EFFICIENCYONE'S TRC TEST CONSERVATIVE? 7 A. Yes, there are several areas that make EfficiencyOne's TRC test results 8 conservative relative to practices in other states or provinces. First, fixed and 9 variable administrative costs...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's TRC test is considered conservative due to factors such as allocating administrative costs at multiple levels, not exempting low-income participants, using WACC as a discount rate, and employing the minimum clearing floor cost for carbon emissions compliance. These practices align with standard evaluation methods.

25. COORDINATION MEETINGS AND REPORTS - 25.1 During the Term of this Agreement, EfficiencyOne shall prepare and deliver to the UARB and NSPI a quarterly report (the " Quarterly Report ") in a form acceptable to the UARB. - 25.2 EfficiencyO...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to submit quarterly and annual reports to the UARB and NSPI, detailing progress on the EECA and financial performance. The agreement emphasizes the importance of ongoing coordination and communication between NSPI and EfficiencyOne to ensure effective planning and implementation of the EECA.

12 13 Performance Targets[\\ ](#page-134-0) 14 The Performance Targets will be achieved in accordance with the EECA Plan as set out 15 in Schedule E. 16 17

AI summary The document references Performance Targets to be achieved according to the EECA Plan outlined in Schedule E.

1 SCHEDULE D 2 3 CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 4 5 THIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT made effective this 1st day of January, 2023 6 7 Between: 8 9 EfficiencyOne, hereinafter "EfficiencyOne" 10 Party of the First Part 11 12 And 1...

AI summary This document outlines a confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, detailing the terms under which confidential information will be shared and treated in accordance with the Supply Agreement and relevant legislation.

PRICE & PAYMENT 13 4. 5 - NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for EECA as set out in Schedule "B" Compensation (the " Contract Price "). 14 4.1 15 - The Contract Price shall constitute full compensation for the EECA, and no additional compens...

AI summary NSPI agrees to pay EfficiencyOne for the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECA) as outlined in Schedule 'B' Compensation, known as the 'Contract Price'. This includes monthly payments, applicable HST, and provisions for tax withholdings and waivers.

17. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - 17.1 NSPI acknowledges that all branding, trade and business marks of EfficiencyOne used in the course of provision of EECA pursuant to this Agreement, (the "EfficiencyOne Brands" ) are, and shall remain, the so...

AI summary This section outlines the intellectual property rights related to branding and trademarks between NSPI and EfficiencyOne. NSPI acknowledges that EfficiencyOne retains ownership of its brands used in the provision of EECA, and vice versa. Both parties agree to return or destroy the respective brands upon termination of the agreement.

ive obligations under this Agreement for EECA provided up to the date of termination. Any claim for payment by EfficiencyOne must be asserted within thirty (30) days from the date of such termination.

AI summary This section outlines the obligations under the agreement for EECA up to the date of termination, and specifies that any claim for payment by EfficiencyOne must be asserted within 30 days from termination.

Table 3: 2021 Interviews Completed Program Component Program Manager 1 / EOne Staff Service Provider/ Distributors Participants Retailers Program Administrators Residential Appliance Retirement 2 - - - - Instant Savings 2 - - 8 - Home Ener...

AI summary Table 3 presents the number of interviews conducted in 2021 across various program components and stakeholder groups, including program managers, service providers, participants, and program administrators. The data highlights engagement levels for different programs such as appliance retirement, instant savings, and market transformation.

Site Visits The Evaluator performed a total of 106 on-site visits during the summer and fall of 2021. For Business Energy Rebates, the objective of on-site visits was to collect data to establish or validate some of the parameters used in...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted 106 on-site visits in 2021 to validate data and parameters for various programs, including Business Energy Rebates, Affordable Multifamily Housing, and Efficient Product Installation. These visits aimed to ensure accuracy in savings calculations and model simulations.

Avoided GHG Emission Calculations The Evaluator estimated the avoided annual GHG emissions resulting from the evaluated electrical savings for all program components. Avoided GHG emissions were estimated by using a Nova Scotiaspecific fact...

AI summary The Evaluator estimated avoided annual GHG emissions from electrical savings using Nova Scotia-specific factors based on 2020 data from Nova Scotia Power and Emera Inc. This factor was derived from total system emissions and electricity generation figures.

Data Collection This subsection describes the data-collection activities conducted for the process and market evaluations. As discussed above, interviews were often integrated to collect impact, process, and market information. - › Seconda...

AI summary This subsection outlines data-collection methods used for process and market evaluations, including the use of secondary data on LED markets and heat pump installations, as well as in-depth interviews with stakeholders to gather insights on program components and experiences.

Table 6: Comparison of 2021 Evaluated and Tracked Energy Savings at the Generator Portfolio Total 141.346 111.047 138.896 0.79 109.418 1,548.786 99% BNI Subtotal 90.978 71.663 88.668 0.77 68.142 970.670 95% Direct Installation Small Busine...

AI summary Table 6 compares the 2021 evaluated and tracked energy savings across different programs and portfolios, including BNI, residential, and DSM initiatives. It highlights energy savings metrics such as annual gross and net savings, NTGR, and lifetime net energy savings for various programs like Small Business Energy Solutions, Strategic Energy Management, and the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project.

3.3 Lifetime Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life values for measures offered by EOne and their associated lifetime energy savings. The Evaluator found that the DSM portfolio generated 1,548.786 GWh in lifetime e...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life (EUL) of energy efficiency measures in the EOne portfolio, finding that the DSM portfolio generated 1,548.786 GWh in lifetime energy savings. Measures with longer EUL, such as insulation and new home construction, contribute disproportionately to lifetime savings compared to annual savings.

Table 9: 2021 Evaluated Net Lifetime Energy Savings at the Generator DSM Program Program Component Annual Net Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Net Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average EUL (years) Residential Residential Efficient Appliance R...

AI summary Table 9 presents the 2021 evaluated net lifetime energy savings at the generator for various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia, including residential, BNI, and portfolio totals, with data on annual and lifetime energy savings and weighted average effective useful life (EUL).

- › Driven by increases in participation, Appliance Retirement slightly surpassed its 2021 energy savings targets and achieved 17% more savings than in 2020. While it did not achieve its 2021 peak demand savings targets, these savings were...

AI summary The document outlines the performance of various energy efficiency programs in 2021, highlighting successes and challenges. Appliance Retirement and Green Heat exceeded their energy savings targets, while Home Energy Assessment and Efficient Product Installation faced challenges. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project is also noted.

Table 13: Evaluated Net Energy Savings at the Generator, 2017-2021 Energy Savings (GWh) Energy Savings (%) DSM Program Program Component 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 Appliance Retirement 3.094 2.657 2.545 2.111 2.474 2% 2%...

AI summary Table 13 presents evaluated net energy savings from various DSM programs and components between 2017 and 2021, including Appliance Retirement, Instant Savings, Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, Efficient Product Installation, and others. The data shows energy savings in gigawatt-hours and percentages for each year.

6.2 Evaluation Approaches for Event-based Demand Response Pilots The 2021-2022 winter peak period is the first time EOne will have a demand response pilot implemented, piloting a domestic hot water demand response pilot as well as a demand...

AI summary EOne is implementing demand response pilots during the 2021-2022 winter peak period, requiring evaluation approaches. Econoler recommends using ex-ante evaluation methods, refined with ex-post analysis, to validate DR capacity available to the grid operator. This ensures demand savings are accurately assessed and aligns with energy efficiency portfolio evaluations.

APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Components Bibliographic References ADS ASSOCIÉS, Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d'économies d'énergie – résidence unifamiliale, report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. NRCan, Air-s...

AI summary This appendix provides a list of bibliographic references for various energy efficiency studies and reports, including evaluations of residential lighting and heat pump technologies, as well as regulatory documents and studies conducted by organizations such as Efficiency Nova Scotia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Calculation of the Weighted Standard Deviation Since the overall adjustment ratio is based on a weighted average, the Evaluator used the weighted standard deviation of the adjustment ratio for the calculation instead of the standard deviat...

AI summary The weighted standard deviation of the adjustment ratio for energy savings was calculated using a specific formula. This approach was used because the overall adjustment ratio is based on a weighted average. The weighted standard deviation for the adjustment ratio of energy savings for lighting measures was determined to be 0.427.

Calculation of the Margins of Error The margins of error of the BER Mail-in lighting measures adjustment ratio were established by using the following formula that applies to samples drawn from a small population (defined as being less tha...

AI summary The document explains the calculation of the margin of error for the BER Mail-in lighting measures adjustment ratio using a specific formula. The margin of error was determined to be 6.7% based on a population size of 394. This calculation was used in 2021 for BER Mail-in lighting measures, while a census approach was used for other programs, making a margin of error calculation unnecessary for them.

DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. Table 14: 2021 ARet Effects and NTGR 17 Table 15: Evaluated 2021 ARet Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings 19 Table 16: Evaluated 2021 ARet GHG Emission Reduction...

AI summary The document provides definitions and includes multiple tables related to energy efficiency programs, rebate evaluations, and savings data from 2021. It discusses topics such as accuracy, energy savings, GHG reductions, and free-ridership levels for various programs.

Table 2: Overall 2021 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation and Evaluated Savings Participa tion Level Gross Sa vings NTGR Net Sav ings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit ARet Energy Savings 4.462 GWh 0.55 2.474 GWh Lifet...

AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program exceeded its 2021 targets for net electrical energy savings and peak demand savings by 29% and 20%, respectively, with Instant Savings being the primary contributor to these achievements.

3.2.4 Effective Useful Life The effective useful life (EUL) values are used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. For ARet, the lifetime energy savings and equivalent EUL of a unit are high...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of effective useful life (EUL) values for appliance retirement (ARET) programs, emphasizing how the remaining useful life (RUL) of old appliances affects energy savings. Equivalent EUL values from the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment are used to calculate gross and net lifetime energy savings, resulting in differences between weighted average EUL values for gross and net savings.

Table 18: List of 2021 Rebates by Product Products Offered During Campaigns Rebate ENERGY STAR Certified Light Emitting Diode (LED) Non-A-type Lamps (single & multipacks) $7/unit or up to 50% off package price Dimmer Switches or Wi-Fi Enab...

AI summary Table 18 lists the 2021 rebates offered for various energy-efficient products, including LED lamps, thermostats, motion sensors, and heat pump water heaters, with varying rebate amounts and conditions.

5.3 Participation History In 2021, a total of 201,175 eligible products were sold in participating stores across Nova Scotia, which represents a decrease of 2% compared to 2020. EOne reported that retailers noted that many, if not all, Ins...

AI summary In 2021, sales of eligible energy-efficient products in Nova Scotia decreased slightly overall, with some categories like LED lamps and clothesline kits declining. However, sales of control products, heat pump water heaters, and variable speed pool pumps increased significantly, driven by incentives and product introductions.

Table 25: 2021 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Energy Savings Product Tracked Savings [kWh/year] Evaluated Savings [kWh/year] ENERGY STAR Certified LED Non-A-type Lamps (R, BR, and Decorative) 45.0 47.2 ENERGY STAR Certified...

AI summary Table 25 presents the 2021 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Energy Savings for various energy-efficient products. The table compares tracked and evaluated savings in kWh/year for different items such as LED lamps, motion sensors, thermostats, and water heaters, indicating varying levels of energy savings impact.

8.2.3 Unitary Peak Demand Savings Peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand period of the electricity system. The projected electricity peak demand period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p....

AI summary The document discusses unitary peak demand savings, focusing on the timing of demand savings during peak electricity periods in Nova Scotia. It references the 2020–2022 Measure Assessment and Table 26, which summarizes tracked and evaluated savings values for products installed through the Instant Savings program in 2021.

Lighting Products and Controls The weighted interactive effects factors for lighting products were established as part of the 2020–2022 Measure Assessment activities and considered the various types of space heating and cooling found in No...

AI summary The document discusses the weighted interactive effects factors for lighting products, established during the 2020–2022 Measure Assessment. These factors account for both indoor and outdoor usage of ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps and fixtures, as part of the Instant Savings program.

8.2.6 Evaluated Gross Savings The annual gross savings are based on the revised unitary savings values established for each product sold in 2021. The results are presented in [Table](#page-139-0) 29 further below. The gross savings at the...

AI summary The annual gross savings are calculated using revised unitary savings values for products sold in 2021. Line loss factors of 1.095 and 1.147 were used to estimate gross energy and peak demand savings, respectively. These factors were submitted to the NSUARB as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. Gross energy savings at the generator were estimated at 15.792 GWh, with a weighted average EUL of 8.12 years.

Evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings (Continued) Product Category Outdoor Motion Sensors Power Bars with Timers Smart Power Bars Heavy-duty Outdoor Timers Programmable Thermostats Smart Thermostats for EBB Cl...

AI summary The document presents a detailed evaluation of energy and peak demand savings from the 2021 Instant Savings program, including data on various product categories, their energy savings values, and lifetime energy savings at the generator level.

Table 36: Evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings LED Non-A-ty /pe Lamps LED ENERGY S STAR Fixtures Dimmor Indoor Product Category R, BR, and Decorative Others Recessed Downlight Fixtures Without Motion Sensors Wi...

AI summary Table 36 presents the evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for various products and categories, including energy savings at the meter and generator, line loss factors, and peak demand savings. The table includes categories such as LED lamps, STAR fixtures, and dimmer switches, along with their respective energy and peak demand savings.

Evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings (Continued) Product Category Outdoor Motion Sensors Power Bars with Timers Smart Power Bars Heavy-duty Outdoor Timers Programmable Thermostats Smart Thermostats for EBB Clot...

AI summary The document presents a table evaluating the 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for various product categories. It includes metrics such as energy savings, NTGR, line loss factor, and lifetime energy savings, but reports zero peak demand savings across all categories.

Evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings (Continued) Product Category Efficient Clothes Washers Efficient Clothes Dryers Room Air Purifiers Dehumidifiers Pool Pumps Heat Pump Water Heaters Showerheads Total for All...

AI summary The document presents evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings data across various product categories, including energy savings at the meter and generator, NTGR, line loss factors, and net lifetime energy savings. The data includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, effective useful life, and peak demand savings.

9.1.5 LED Lamp Prices [Figure](#page-160-1) 17 below illustrates the evolution in the unit price (before rebate) of eligible LED lamps sold through Instant Savings. Program component data for 2019, 2020 and 2021 are available only for non-...

AI summary The text discusses the evolution of LED lamp prices through the Instant Savings program, noting a slow rise in average prices for non-A-type lamps since 2019, with a significant increase in 2021. It also references Nova Scotia's inflation rate and provides data sources for the information.

Table 45: Overall 2021 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation Level and Evaluated Savings Participat tion Level Gross Sa vings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit ARet Energy Savings 4.462 GWh 0.55 2.474 GW...

AI summary Table 45 summarizes the 2021 participation levels and savings from the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program. The program exceeded its net electrical energy savings target by 29% and peak demand savings target by 20%, with Instant Savings being the main contributor.

Sections 2021 Recommendations Executive Summary 1. Update the LED lamp and fixture baselines in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment to reflect updates to regulations, the growing presence of LEDs in the market as well as the decreased market...

AI summary The document outlines recommendations from a 2021 evaluation, including updating LED lamp and fixture baselines, performing socket studies, adjusting free-ridership levels for Costco participants, and monitoring market trends. It highlights challenges in data availability and the impact of the pandemic on market observations.

1.1 HEA Description HEA is a home energy evaluation-based program component that encourages homeowners to improve the energy efficiency and comfort of their home by providing them with related information and financial incentives in the fo...

AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program provides homeowners with energy evaluations and financial incentives to improve home energy efficiency. The program involves a pre-retrofit assessment, eligibility for rebates, and a post-retrofit assessment to confirm upgrades. The cost of the pre-retrofit assessment increased in August 2021, and eligible participants can receive a reimbursement of $100 after completing upgrades.

Reporting Requirements HEA incentives originate from two sources of funding and are thus reported to two different parties via the 2021 DSM evaluation and the 2021/22 PNS evaluation reports. The DSM evaluation is focused on reporting elect...

AI summary HEA incentives are funded from two sources and reported in two evaluations: the 2021 DSM evaluation and the 2021/22 PNS evaluation. Equations were developed to avoid double counting and better reflect energy savings from fuel switching and the distribution of savings between DSM and PNS programs. The 2019 formulas were updated and remained valid for the 2021 evaluation.

3.3.6 Evaluated Net Savings Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions specifically attributable to HEA. Net savings were calculated by applying the NTGR value, adding unconverted D assessment spillover savings, and subtracting G...

AI summary Net savings from HEA are calculated using the NTGR value and adjusted for spillover and deduction factors. The 2021 net energy savings were estimated at 3.481 GWh and 1.495 MW, with lifetime savings of 72.399 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 20.8 years.

15 At the time of writing, 2021 data were not yet available. The Nova Scotia-specific factor was obtained from Nova Scotia Power's 2020 total system emissions data (6,283,894 CO 2 eq tonnes) and total electricity generation (10,759 GWh) wa...

AI summary The text references Nova Scotia Power's 2020 emissions data and electricity generation figures, obtained from their website and Emera Inc.'s 2020 Management's Discussion & Analysis report, to calculate a Nova Scotia-specific factor.

Table 43: Analysis of 2021 Key Factors in Program Component Planning Factor Results Market share of heat pumps and efficient MSHPs NS Power predicted a relatively flat market for MSHPs in 2020 and 2021. That said, distributors reported inc...

AI summary The market for mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) in Nova Scotia is showing increased adoption, with 35% of households using them in 2021. Distributors report rising sales, and efficiency of MSHPs has improved due to stricter requirements. Prices for higher capacity units have increased, but incentives from EOne have supported adoption. A new regulation in 2023 is expected to further push for more efficient heat pumps.

11.3 Participation History direct installations. As presented in [Figure](#page-152-0) 26 below, EPI had 10,028 DSM participants, which represents a 15% increase in participation compared to 2020. 34 This can be explained in large part by...

AI summary The document discusses the participation history of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, highlighting a 15% increase in participants in 2021 compared to 2020. Despite this, the average number of products installed per household decreased, and savings per participant also declined slightly. LED lamps remain the most popular product type, contributing significantly to energy savings.

12 EPI EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 EPI evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation. The main objectives of the 2021 EPI evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net EPI results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime en...

AI summary The 2021 EPI evaluation focused on calculating gross and net energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions. The evaluation aimed to address key research questions and utilized specific methods outlined in Table 46.

Tracking Sheet Audit Prior to performing the savings calculation review, the Evaluator audited the final 2021 tracking sheet to ensure it was complete and the entered data were consistent. The detailed protocol used for the tracking sheet...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted an audit of the final 2021 tracking sheet to ensure its completeness and data consistency prior to reviewing the savings calculations. The audit protocol and results are detailed in Appendix XII.

14.1 Tracking Sheet Audit To ensure program component results are reliably compiled, the Evaluator first performed a tracking sheet audit aimed at verifying the completeness and consistency of the data submitted by EOne. The verification a...

AI summary A tracking sheet audit was conducted to verify the completeness and consistency of data submitted by EOne, ensuring reliable compilation of program component results. Corrective actions taken by the Evaluator are detailed in Appendix XII, leading to corrected tracked savings results.

14.2 Gross Savings For EPI, gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from installing energy efficient products in participants' homes regardless of why they participated. 40 While the Evaluator relied on infor...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of gross savings for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including updates to installation rates, assumptions, and energy use values based on evaluations and on-site visits.

14.2.2 Unitary Energy Savings For EPI, EOne establishes separate unitary savings values for single-family homes and apartments. The Evaluator used the unitary savings values from the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment and revised them where nece...

AI summary The Evaluator adjusted unitary savings values for EPI products, such as DHW products and blackout bulbs, based on 2021 on-site visit findings. The document details changes made to unitary savings calculations and provides a summary of tracked and evaluated energy savings for each product installed through EPI in 2021.

14.2.3 Unitary Peak Demand Savings Peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand period of the electricity system. The projected electricity demand peak period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p...

AI summary This section discusses unitary peak demand savings in Nova Scotia, focusing on the peak demand period between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. during December to February on non-holiday weekdays. The Evaluator used the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment to establish unitary peak demand savings for each product, with updates and additions based on literature reviews.

Table 52: 2021 EPI Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values Product Tracked Equivalent EUL [years] Evaluated Equivalent EUL [years] Evaluated Gross Lifetime Unitary Savings [kWh] Single-familyApartments LED A19 Lamps 9 W Replacing 25 W 4.0...

AI summary The document presents a table with 2021 EPI Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various energy-efficient products, including LED lamps, air sealing kits, and low-flow showerheads. The table includes both tracked and evaluated EUL values, as well as gross lifetime unitary savings in kilowatt-hours for single-family apartments.

The annual gross savings for each category of products installed in 2021 through EPI are listed below. [Table](#page-170-0) 53 and [Table](#page-178-0) 54 below present the results for single-family homes and apartments respectively. Overa...

AI summary The annual gross savings from EPI programs in 2021 are detailed, with total energy and peak demand savings reported as 8.174 GWh and 1.143 MW respectively. These savings are calculated using line loss factors from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update submitted to the NSUARB.

Table 53: Evaluated 2021 EPI Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings - Single-family Homes LED Lamps Product Category 9 W Replacing 25 W 29 W 40 W 43 W 60 W 72 W 100 W 150 W Number of Units Number of Units 359 847 7,652 670 59,700 110 5,414 6...

AI summary Table 53 evaluates the 2021 EPI gross energy and peak demand savings for single-family homes, detailing metrics such as unitary energy savings, installation rates, and gross energy savings at the meter and generator. It also includes factors like energy interactive effects and line loss for different wattage LED lamps.

LED Lamps Product Category 9.5 W Replacing 29 W 40 W 43 W 60 W 72 W 100 W 150 W Number of Units Number of Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Installation Rate (%) 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% Number of Units Installed 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Energy Savings Unitary...

AI summary The table presents data on LED lamp installations and their energy savings across various wattage categories, including unitary energy savings, installation rates, and adjustments. Only 2 units of 150W lamps were installed, with no energy savings recorded at the meter or generator for most categories, except for a small amount of lifetime energy savings for 150W lamps.

LED Lamps Product Category PAR38 15 W Replacing 120 W PAR38 15 W Replacing 150 W GU10 7 W Replacing 35 W GU10 7 W Replacing 50 W G25 7 W Replacing 40 W E12 5 W Chandelier Replacing 40 W Number of Units Number of Units 551 1,595 762 5,056 4...

AI summary The table presents data on energy savings and installation rates for various LED lamp products, including numbers of units, energy savings at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings. It also includes factors such as interactive effects and line loss, which are used to calculate the energy savings.

Low-flow Showerheads LED Nightlights Faucet Aerators 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Number of Units Number of Units 9,949 5,418 224 186 3,323 Installation Rate (%) 94% 85% 96% 96% 96% Number of Units Installed 9,352...

AI summary The table details energy savings from the installation of low-flow showerheads and other efficiency measures, including units installed, energy savings, and peak demand reductions. It includes metrics like energy savings at the meter and generator, interactive effects factors, and line loss factors for different product types.

Thermostatic Shower Valves Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Product Category 1.5 gpm 2.0 gpm 2.5 gpm (per feet) Wraps Number of Units Number of Units 3 4 1,349 6,936 2,139 Installation Rate (%) 88% 88% 88% 100% 100% Number of Units Installed...

AI summary The document presents a detailed table of energy savings data for various energy efficiency programs, including thermostatic shower valves, pipe insulation, and hot water tanks. It includes metrics such as number of units installed, energy savings, peak demand savings, and factors like interactive effects and line loss.

Defendable Air Sealing Kits – Electric Resistance Heating 0.242 0.063 0.022 0.039 0.081

AI summary The table presents data related to air sealing kits for electric resistance heating, including numerical values that may represent costs, efficiencies, or other metrics. The context suggests a regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency programs and their associated costs or benefits.

Table 54: Evaluated 2021 EPI Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings – Apartments LED Lamps Product Category 9 W Replacing 25 W 29 W 40 W 43 W 60 W 72 W 100 W 150 W Number of Units Number of Units 14 19 122 16 4,135 0 90 1 Installation Rate (...

AI summary Table 54 evaluates the 2021 EPI gross energy and peak demand savings in apartments, providing data on energy savings, installation rates, and interactive effects factors for different LED lamp wattages. The table includes metrics such as unitary energy savings, gross energy savings at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings.

Low-flow Showerheads LED Nightlights Faucet Aerators 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Number of Units Number of Units 1,996 515 8 5 243 Installation Rate (%) 94% 85% 96% 96% 96% Number of Units Installed 1,876 438 8 5...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing energy savings from the installation of low-flow showerheads, LED nightlights, and faucet aerators across different units. It includes metrics like installation rates, energy savings, and peak demand savings, along with factors such as interactive effects and line loss.

PAR38 15 W PAR38 15 W GU10 7 W GU10 7 W G25 7 W E12 5 W Chandelier Replacing 40 W 0.053 0.201 0.016 0.163 0.100 0.394 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.048 0.180 0.015 0.147 0.090 0.354 1.0947 1.0947 1.0947 1.0938 1.0947 1.0946 0.053 0.198 0...

AI summary The text presents a table with various lighting products and their corresponding metrics, including wattage, efficiency factors, and line loss calculations. The table includes values for different bulb types and replacement scenarios, with a note explaining how line loss factors are calculated based on weighted average proportions of rate codes.

Product Category Define del le Air Sealing Kits – Electric Resistance Heating Retractable Clotheslines Foam Gaskets Door Sweeps Window Air Sealing Door Weather Stripping Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.291 0.063...

AI summary The table presents energy savings data for various products under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including gross and net energy savings, NTGR, line loss factors, and peak demand savings at the meter and generator levels. The data is used to assess the effectiveness of energy efficiency measures.

Table 59: Evaluated 2021 EPI GHG Emission Reductions Total Net Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) 7.812 Nova Scotia-specific GHG Emissions Factor for Electricity Production (kg of CO2 eq/kWh) 0.5841 Gross Annual GHG Emission Reduction...

AI summary Table 59 evaluates the 2021 GHG emission reductions from the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, showing net energy savings of 7.812 GWh and gross annual GHG emission reductions of 4,563 tonnes of CO2 eq. Section 14.4 discusses the realization rate.

20.1 AMH Description AMH provides affordable housing owners and non-profit organizations, such as rehabilitation or transition houses, with incentives for building-wide energy retrofit projects with the intent of reducing electrical and no...

AI summary AMH provides incentives for energy retrofit projects in affordable housing and non-profit organizations, aiming for energy savings. Projects require audits unless specific measures are installed, and funding comes from electricity ratepayers and the Province of Nova Scotia. Due to the pandemic, in-home activities were suspended temporarily, affecting project completions.

Tracking Sheet Audit Calculate net results Prior to conducting the savings calculation review, the Evaluator performed an audit of the final 2020 tracking sheet to ensure it was complete and the entered data were consistent. The detailed p...

AI summary An audit of the final 2020 tracking sheet was conducted to ensure completeness and data consistency prior to the savings calculation review. The audit protocol and results are detailed in Appendix XIX.

23.2.1 On-site Visits and Desk Review Findings The Evaluator conducted a desk review for four prescriptive projects and on-site visits accompanied by simulation model reviews for three comprehensive projects. Reviewed projects were randoml...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted desk reviews and on-site visits for energy efficiency projects, verifying the accuracy of savings calculations. Adjustments were made to one project due to an incorrect heat pump capacity value in the simulation model, while no adjustments were needed for the others.

Data Accuracy [Table](#page-37-0) 1 lists all the parameters required for the HEA evaluation. The Evaluator validated whether the data contained in the tracking sheet submitted by EOne were accurate based on previous evaluation results as...

AI summary The document discusses the validation of data accuracy in the HEA evaluation process, focusing on the parameters listed in Table 1 and the actions taken by the Evaluator to adjust data as needed based on previous results and completeness.

B. Efficiency and Price of MSHPs First, I want to discuss with you the characteristics of the MSHPs that you sell. Efficiency Nova Scotia's Green Heat program provides incentives to high-performance cold climate MSHPs; that is MSHPs that h...

AI summary The document discusses the efficiency and pricing of Mini-Split Heat Pumps (MSHPs), focusing on the criteria for high-performing cold climate MSHPs under Efficiency Nova Scotia's Green Heat program. It also asks about the availability and pricing trends of these MSHPs since 2019.

Table 3: Participant Spillover Algorithm G1. Since participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service, have you installed any additional efficient products in your home? IF Yes: CONTINUE IF No OR DK OR REF : GO TO G5 G2. What ener...

AI summary Table 3 outlines the Participant Spillover Algorithm used to assess the impact of the Efficient Product Installation Service (EPI) on energy-efficient product installations and appliance retirements. It includes steps to calculate energy savings, rebate impacts, and attribution levels based on participant responses.

Table 1: Verification of 2021 AMH Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Participant...

AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 AMH data fields. While most data fields are complete and consistent, the rate codes for two DSM participants were missing and were assigned by the evaluator based on address and organization type.

Table 3: Verification of 2021 AMH Data Field Consistency Program Component Result Valid Equation? (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Gross Energy Savings at the Generator N The values for the gross energy and peak demand savings a...

AI summary This table verifies the consistency of 2021 AMH data fields. It highlights issues with the absence of gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator, which were resolved using net savings data. The evaluation confirmed the appropriateness of the net energy savings equation, though some discrepancies were noted.

2 NHC EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 NHC evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation. The main objectives of the 2021 NHC evaluation were as follows: › Calculate NHC gross and net results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime ene...

AI summary The 2021 NHC evaluation focused on calculating both gross and net results, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions. The evaluation involved auditing tracking sheets, applying correct formulas, and using NTGR results from 2020 to calculate net savings and GHG emissions.

[Table](#page-198-2) 11 below presents the annual gross savings for NHC. Overall, the total gross energy and peak demand savings amounted to 6.245 GWh and 2.511 MW at the generator respectively. Based on EUL values of 36 years for Tier 3 p...

AI summary The table presents annual gross energy and peak demand savings for NHC, totaling 6.245 GWh and 2.511 MW respectively. Lifetime gross energy savings are estimated at 190.712 GWh based on EUL values. Line loss factors used in the calculation were updated in the 2019 evaluation and submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update.

Table 2: Verification of NHC 2021 Data Field Consistency Consistency Verification Consistent (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Verification of Duplicate IDs or Projects Y Verification of Negative As built Modelled Energy Consumpt...

AI summary Table 2 verifies data consistency in the NHC 2021 program. It identifies inconsistencies such as negative energy consumption values, negative savings against incentives, and incorrect savings claims for non-electrical heating systems. Actions taken include capping values at zero and removing participants from the tracking sheet.

Table 2: Overall 2021 Efficient Product Rebates Participation and Evaluated Savings Participati ion Level Gross Sa vings NTGR Net Sav ings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit Mail-in Energy Savings 16.366 GWh 0.74 12.111 GWh Lifetime En...

AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates program aimed to achieve 35.681 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 7.236 MW in net peak demand savings for 2021. However, it only achieved 33.491 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 5.401 MW in net peak demand savings, falling short of the planned targets. Instant Rebates was the largest contributor to the program's savings.

1.1 BER Description BER provides financial incentives in the form of prescriptive rebates or financing to business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants to foster reductions in electricity consumption and peak demand. All busin...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides financial incentives to BNI participants to reduce electricity consumption and peak demand. The program offers prescriptive rebates and financing, with participation through Mail-in or Instant Rebates. In 2021, participation was affected by supply chain delays, but rebate amounts were increased to boost engagement. The program aimed for 35.681 GWh in energy savings and 7.236 MW in peak demand savings.

1.2 Follow-up on Past Evaluation Report Recommendations The Evaluator evaluated BER in previous years and issued improvement recommendations. [Table](#page-32-1) 7 provides one past recommendation that has been carried forward; no recommen...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed past recommendations for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program and noted that one recommendation from previous years has been carried forward. Implementation was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and no new recommendations were issued in 2020.

BER Mail-in In 2021, 301 Mail-in projects were implemented by 187 unique participants. 2 [Figure](#page-32-2) 6 below illustrates how Mail-in participation has evolved since 2015. The number of participating businesses increased in 2021, w...

AI summary In 2021, the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Mail-in program saw 301 projects implemented by 187 participants. Participation increased by 18% compared to 2020 but remained below pre-pandemic levels. Gross savings per participant decreased to 87.518 MWh. Lighting and motor/VFD measures accounted for the majority of savings, though lighting's share declined due to smaller project sizes. The pandemic and delayed recovery are cited as key factors.

2 BER EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 BER evaluation comprised a comprehensive impact evaluation as well as a market evaluation. The main objectives of the 2021 BER evaluation were as follows: - › Collect information on participant and partne...

AI summary The 2021 BER evaluation involved a comprehensive impact and market evaluation with objectives including collecting participant perspectives, calculating energy savings, and analyzing LED adoption in the commercial lighting market.

Unitary Savings Review As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the equations, parameters, and assumptions used to establish savings values for eight BER measures. In 2021, unitary peak demand savings...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed equations and assumptions for eight BER measures as part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment. Savings values for booster pumps and RTU controls were updated based on project data and literature reviews.

GHG Emission Reduction Calculations To obtain net avoided GHG emissions in CO 2 eq for BER, the Evaluator multiplied the net energy savings by the latest Nova Scotia-specific factor for GHG emissions generated by electricity production. Th...

AI summary The document explains how net avoided GHG emissions for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program are calculated by multiplying net energy savings by a Nova Scotia-specific GHG emissions factor derived from NS Power data.

The savings achieved for each Mail-in measure category are presented in [Table](#page-56-0) 13 below. Both energy and peak demand savings were revised by applying the adjustment ratios discussed in Subsection [4.2.1](#page-48-3) above. The...

AI summary The document discusses energy and peak demand savings from Mail-in measure categories, using line loss factors and data from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. The total energy and peak demand savings at the generator are 16.366 GWh and 2.433 MW, with lifetime energy savings of 258.596 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 15.8 years.

Evaluated 2021 Mail-in Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings (Continued) Measure Category Water Heating Kitchen Pumping Compressed Air Total for All Categories Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.067 0.031 0.0...

AI summary The document presents a table evaluating 2021 mail-in gross energy and peak demand savings across various categories such as water heating, kitchen, pumping, and compressed air. It includes metrics like energy savings, adjustment ratios, line loss factors, and lifetime energy savings, with a total of 258.596 GWh of gross lifetime energy savings at the generator.

Table 17: Evaluated 2021 Mail-in GHG Emission Reductions Total Net Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) 12.111 Nova Scotia-specific GHG Emissions Factor for Electricity Production (kg of CO2 eq/GWh) 0.5841 Net Annual GHG Emission Reduct...

AI summary Table 17 evaluates the 2021 mail-in GHG emission reductions, showing net energy savings of 12.111 GWh and a reduction of 7,074 tonnes of CO2 eq. This data is associated with the Business Energy Rebates program.

5.2 Gross Savings For Instant Rebates, gross savings refer to changes in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants regardless of their reasons for participating. 11 Since eligible measures are tracked at the point of...

AI summary Gross savings for Instant Rebates are calculated based on changes in energy consumption from participant actions, using assumptions specific to each measure type. EOne calculates savings using equations that include baseline wattages, efficient measure wattages, and other factors. During 2020-2022, the Evaluator validated and revised these equations and assessed EUL values.

5.2.2 In-service Rates Research indicates that a percentage of measures purchased through rebate programs might be stored for later use. As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator established the in-service rate...

AI summary Research suggests that some measures purchased through rebate programs may be stored for later use. The Evaluator established an in-service rate (ISR) of 85% for linear LED lamps and 100% for other measures like fixtures and sensors as part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities.

Table 20: 2021 Instant Rebates Equivalent EUL Values Product Tracked Equivalent EUL [years] Evaluated Equivalent EUL [years] LED Linear Fixtures 1 x 4 Luminaires 11.6 No change 2 x 2 Luminaires and Retrofit Kits 11.6 No change 2 x 4 Lumina...

AI summary Table 20 presents Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values for various energy-efficient products under the 2021 Instant Rebates program. The EUL values are categorized by product type, with most products showing no change in their evaluated EUL compared to the tracked EUL.

Table 21: Evaluated 2021 Instant Rebates Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Measure Category LED Linear Fixtures LED Linear Lamps LED Outdoor Fixtures LED Directional and Architectur al Fixtures Occupancy /Motion Sensors Circulator Pumps...

AI summary Table 21 evaluates the 2021 Instant Rebates program, detailing energy and peak demand savings across various measures, including LED fixtures, occupancy sensors, and pumps, with data on number of units, energy savings, and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.

Table 30: 2021 Analysis of Key Factors in Program Planning Factor Results Trends in prices and availability The average retail prices of LED linear fixtures and LED linear lamps reached a new low at approximately $74 and $9 respectively in...

AI summary In 2021, the average retail prices of LED linear fixtures and lamps reached new lows at approximately $74 and $9, respectively, while remaining stable despite increasing quality and variety. LED technology is widely available to BNI customers in Nova Scotia due to the involvement of most distributors in BER.

2021 BER-Finding: Following the site visits, the Evaluator made downward adjustments to energy and peak demand savings for Mail-in. The Mail-In lighting project review and site visit results revealed that the parameters used to determine t...

AI summary The 2021 BER-Finding highlights downward adjustments to energy and peak demand savings for the Mail-in program due to incorrect reporting of parameters like HOUs and peak coincidence factors. It also notes a decline in the NTGR for Mail-in and Instant Rebates, attributed to increased free-ridership. The LED fixture market is approaching maturity, with stabilizing prices and growing shares despite overall shipment declines.

Table 31: Overall 2021 Efficient Product Rebates Participation and Evaluated Savings Participati ion Level Gross Sa Gross Savings Net Sav ings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit Mail-in Energy Savings 16.366 GWh 0.74 12.111 GWh Lifetim...

AI summary Table 31 presents participation and savings data for the 2021 Efficient Product Rebates program. The program aimed to achieve 35.681 GWh in net energy savings and 7.236 MW in peak demand savings but fell short, achieving 33.491 GWh and 5.401 MW respectively. Instant Rebates was the primary contributor to these savings.

C5. [ASK IF MEASURE CATEGORY IS NOT LIGHTING] offered, what is the likelihood that you would have implemented exactly the same energy efficient Energy Rebates Program? If the program rebate had not been measures that you purchased through...

AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the influence of energy rebate programs on the implementation of energy-efficient measures, particularly focusing on lighting and other measures. It also asks about the likelihood of implementing the same measures without the rebate and the influence of various factors such as program representatives and on-site energy managers.

E4. You mentioned that the eligible measures were not sufficient. Were there types of efficient equipment or services you would like to see Efficiency Nova Scotia provide rebates for? Other Types of Efficient Equipment or Services for ENS...

AI summary Respondents indicated that the list of eligible measures for rebates by Efficiency Nova Scotia was insufficient, with suggestions for additional equipment and services such as ventilation systems, solar panels, and heat pumps. Satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates program was generally high, with mean scores ranging from 8.8 to 9.1 across multiple years.

E8c. Why were you not more satisfied with the rebate amounts? Reasons Not More Satisfied with Rebate Amounts 2017 2018 2019 2021 Sample Size 16 (#) 16 (#) 13 (#) 11 (#) Rebate is too small/expected higher rebate 13 15 11 9 Rates are differ...

AI summary Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with rebate amounts, citing that rebates were too small and expected higher rebates. A small number of respondents also mentioned differences in rates across facilities and the high cost of measures. The data is based on responses from 2017 to 2021.

ASK ALL - READ AND ROTATE (E1 + E2-E4) AND (E5 + E6-E8) SEQUENCES - E1. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program in 2021, had your organization at any time in the past already participated in the Business Energy Rebates...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions aimed at assessing the impact of previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and exposure to promotional materials on business decisions regarding energy efficiency, particularly in relation to purchasing products and considering cost-effectiveness.

C5. What was the SECOND most important reason you purchased [PRODUCT] rather than a standard [STANDARD PRODUCT]?\ \ 2018 2019 2020 2021 Motivations for Buying Efficient Products Most Important Reason Other Reasons Most Important Reason Oth...

AI summary The table shows the motivations for purchasing energy-efficient products from 2018 to 2021, highlighting reasons such as improving energy efficiency, saving on energy costs, and taking advantage of program rebates. The data reflects responses from individuals who purchased products for their organization or made the decision to buy efficient products.

D4. How did you first become aware of the rebates available under Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates Program? Source of Awareness of Rebates 2018 2019 2020 2021 Sample Size 30 31 20 20 Through my distributor 57% 39% 65% 55% T...

AI summary The text presents data on how participants became aware of the Business Energy Rebates Program and whether they had already decided to purchase energy-efficient products before learning about the rebate. The data spans from 2018 to 2021 and highlights the primary sources of awareness, such as distributors and contractors.

ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials Led to Assess Product Cost-Effectiveness 2018 2019 2020 2021 Sample Size 48 52 45 44 Agree 81% 77% 71% 66% Disagree 19% 23% 29% 32% Don't know - - - 2% Base: Respondents who previously saw ENS en...

AI summary The document presents survey data on customer satisfaction with ENS energy-efficiency promotional materials and the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program from 2018 to 2021. It highlights declining satisfaction levels and identifies reasons for dissatisfaction, such as mail-in rebates, small rebate amounts, and lack of program knowledge.

A. Identification and Screening of Respondent - A1. I'd like to speak with someone in your company/store who is knowledgeable about the stocking and supplying of specific products that were rebated by the program. These products are 1) lin...

AI summary The document outlines a process for identifying and screening respondents in a regulatory proceeding, focusing on individuals responsible for stocking and supplying specific LED products rebated by a program in Nova Scotia. The text includes options for proceeding based on the availability of the responsible person.

ASK IF OUTDOOR LED FIXTURES WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM I have a few questions about your sales of Outdoor LED fixtures that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. This category includes the following measures (as define...

AI summary The document inquires about the sales of outdoor LED fixtures under the Business Energy Rebates Program, including the number sold, the impact of the program on sales, and the influence of incentives on customer choices. It also asks about potential changes in sales trends and competitor activity.

APPENDIX VI BER: MAIL-IN TRACKING SHEET AUDIT This appendix presents the results of the tracking sheet audit performed by the Evaluator, which was aimed at: - › Verifying that all data fields required for the evaluation were included and f...

AI summary This appendix details the audit of the Mail-in Tracking Sheet conducted by the Evaluator to verify data completeness and accuracy in EfficiencyOne's submissions. The audit aimed to ensure consistency in calculation methods and parameters used for evaluating energy and peak demand savings, noting a change in tracking sheet format due to the implementation of a new system in 2021.

Table 1: Verification of 2021 Mail-in Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/ Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Partic...

AI summary The document verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 mail-in data fields, identifying partial completeness in some fields and actions taken to correct inconsistencies, such as recalculating peak demand savings and adjusting line loss factors and effective useful life values.

Table 3: Verification of 2021 Mail-in Savings Compilation Service Result Valid Equation? (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Gross Energy Savings at the Generator Y N/A Gross Peak Demand Savings at the Generator Y N/A Net Energy Sa...

AI summary Table 3 verifies the 2021 mail-in savings compilation. It indicates that gross energy and peak demand savings were valid, but net energy and peak demand savings had inconsistencies. The evaluator corrected the net results due to discrepancies in the NTGR value used.

On-site Visit Protocol The 2021 BER Mail-in on-site visit protocol was prepared based on the 2019 protocol. The only major change to the latter was that the sections for all measure categories other than for lighting were removed. The prot...

AI summary The 2021 BER Mail-in on-site visit protocol was based on the 2019 version, with changes including the removal of sections for measure categories other than lighting. The protocol includes general and measure-specific data sections, with most fields pre-filled using project documentation from EOne to save time during on-site visits.

Table 1: Tracked Variables for Example Calculation Baseline Measure – Six-lamp T8 High-bay Fixture Parameter Value Source Baseline Fixture Quantity 43 Tracking Sheet Baseline System Wattage (W) 175 Tracking Sheet Hours of Use (hrs/year) 6,...

AI summary Table 1 presents a comparison between a baseline six-lamp T8 high-bay fixture and an efficient 123W LED high-bay fixture, including parameters such as system wattage, energy consumption, and demand savings. Calculations are based on tracked variables and interactive effects factors, with savings tracked in both energy and demand.

Table 1: Verification of 2021 Instant Rebates Data Field Completeness and Accuracy – Lighting Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each...

AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of data fields related to 2021 instant rebates for lighting. Issues were identified with wattage baseline, hours of operation, and energy savings calculations, which were corrected based on 2020 evaluation standards.

Equations and Compilation Once the correct values were established (as per Table 1 and Table 2 above), the Evaluator validated that the equations in the tracking sheet correctly calculated each of the main program component results as pres...

AI summary The Evaluator confirmed that the equations in the tracking sheet correctly calculated the main program component results based on the values established in Table 1 and Table 2, as presented in Table 3 and Table 4.

Table 3: Verification of 2021 Instant Rebates Savings Compilation – Lighting Program Result Valid Equation? (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Gross Energy Savings at the Generator N The total savings calculations were based on Gr...

AI summary The document verifies the accuracy of energy savings calculations for the 2021 Instant Rebates program, specifically for lighting and pumping. It highlights errors in the lighting calculations, such as incorrect interactive effect factors, which required adjustments to obtain accurate results.

Table 6: 2021 Instant Rebates Tracked and Corrected Savings – Pumping Program Component Result Value Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Relative Difference Value Unit Value Unit Value BER Instant Rebates – Pumping Gross Energy Savings...

AI summary The table shows discrepancies in tracked energy and demand savings from the BER Instant Rebates – Pumping program in 2021. The Evaluator corrected the NTGR from 0.75 to 1.00, significantly increasing both gross and net energy savings values.

Table 1: Instant Rebates End-users D7. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a rebate for the purchase of efficient lighting products. If your organization had not received the rebate and the cost for [PRODUCT] had been about $[REBATE AVERAGE VAL...

AI summary This table presents a series of questions and scoring mechanisms related to the impact of instant rebates on the purchase of efficient lighting products by end-users, including how rebate removal might affect purchasing decisions and timing.

APPENDIX XIII BER: 2021 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations issued by the Evaluator as part of the 2021 evaluation as well as all past evaluation recommendations that were not fully implemented or deferred. Sec...

AI summary This appendix outlines the 2021 recommendations for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including changes to improve the accuracy of tracked parameters in the lighting measure worksheet. It also references deferred 2018 recommendations, such as investigating ways to liaise more clients with non-lighting contractors.

Table 39: Evaluated 2021 EMIS Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings 82 Table 40: Evaluated 2021 EMIS GHG Emission Reductions83 Table 41: Comparison of 2021 EMIS Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator84 Table 42: Implementation Statu...

AI summary The text presents a list of tables and figures from a regulatory proceeding document, focusing on energy management and efficiency programs. Tables evaluate energy savings, GHG emissions, and program implementation status, while figures illustrate program performance, participant satisfaction, and participation trends over time.

Table 1: Summary of Custom Incentives Program Evaluation Program Evaluation Type Component Impact Process Market Methodology Custom Comprehensive X - NC › Participant phone interviews (New Construction) or participant follow-up interview d...

AI summary The document presents a summary of the Custom Incentives Program Evaluation, including the evaluation type, impact, process, market, and methodology for various programs. It outlines methods such as participant interviews, desk reviews, tracking sheet audits, and GHG emission reduction calculations.

[Table](#page-9-0) 2 presents the participation levels, NTGRs, as well as evaluated gross and net savings at the generator for each program component and for the Custom Incentives program as a whole.

AI summary Table 2 outlines participation levels, NTGRs, and evaluated gross and net savings at the generator for each program component and the Custom Incentives program as a whole.

Table 2: Overall 2021 Custom Incentives Participation and Savings Participation Le Gross Savings NTGR NTGR Net Savin Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit Custom Energy Savings 5 26.729 GWh 0.87 23.293 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 102 Proj...

AI summary Table 2 summarizes the performance of the 2021 Custom Incentives program, which aimed to achieve 33.610 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 8.476 MW in net peak demand savings. However, the program achieved only 25.165 GWh in energy savings and 6.390 MW in peak demand savings, falling short of its targets. Custom incentives were the largest contributor to the program's outcomes.

EUL was estimated at 6.2 years, which is significantly higher than the EUL of approximately three years that would have been estimated using the methodology based on the remaining time in the program. 2021 SEM-Finding : While adjustments t...

AI summary The estimated equipment useful life (EUL) was 6.2 years, significantly higher than the three-year estimate using the program's remaining time methodology. Adjustments to peak demand savings were significant due to unreported savings by EOne for some projects.

1.1 Custom Description Custom provides large business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants with technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to help reduce their electricity consumption and demand. Busines...

AI summary The Custom program offers technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to large businesses, non-profits, and institutions to reduce electricity consumption and demand. It includes retrofit, new construction, building optimization, and a pilot for operational demand savings.

Table 10: Summary of Tracked and Evaluated Effective Useful Life Project Tracked EUL [years] Evaluated EUL [years] Participant 1 3 3 Participant 2 3 1 Participant 3 11 12.7 The EUL for Participant 2 was adjusted to one year from three year...

AI summary Table 10 summarizes the effective useful life (EUL) of projects, showing adjustments due to changes in facility ventilation requirements and standard practice for control replacement measures. Participant 2's EUL was reduced to one year due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, while Participant 3's EUL was increased to 12.7 years based on the Custom Project Agreement (CPA).

Table 12: Evaluated Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Savings for 2021 Number of Projects 3 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.418 Adjustment Ratio for Energy Savings 0.99 Gross Energy Savings Without Tru...

AI summary Table 12 presents evaluated gross energy and peak demand savings for 2021, including adjustments and line loss factors. It highlights energy and peak demand savings at the meter and generator, with specific reference to the Klondike pilot and its contribution to energy savings.

ator made the appropriate downward adjustments to energy and peak demand savings in accordance with the reduced operating schedule. For four projects, the Evaluator adjusted peak demand savings only: - › One of the files included a compres...

AI summary The evaluator made downward adjustments to energy and peak demand savings for four projects due to issues such as unsubstantiated claims, keying errors, and inadequate consideration of demand savings. Adjustments were categorized into methodology, demand savings consideration, and process quality errors.

[Table](#page-52-0) 18 below presents the evaluated gross savings for Retrofit, which were obtained by applying the overall adjustment ratios for energy savings and peak demand savings as well as the true-up adjustments to the final saving...

AI summary The document presents evaluated gross savings for Retrofit projects in 2021, calculated using line loss factors from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. The savings at the generator were 14.570 GWh for energy and 3.007 MW for peak demand, with lifetime energy savings totaling 179.288 GWh.

9.2.1 Sampling Methodology For the energy model review, the Evaluator selected a sample of 12 projects from a total of 21 projects completed in 2021. The project sample represented 91% of total tracked energy savings for projects completed...

AI summary The Evaluator selected a sample of 12 projects from 21 completed in 2021 for the energy model review, representing 91% of total tracked energy savings. The sample was designed using industry best practices, with selection probability proportional to project size, ensuring a variety of project types were included.

Energy Savings Positive or negative adjustments were made to the tracked gross energy savings of the 12 projects reviewed by the Evaluator for 2021, with some of the adjustments being minor. One large project was reviewed separately due to...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed 12 energy efficiency projects in 2021, making adjustments to their gross energy savings. One project had a significant adjustment ratio of 0.650 due to baseline exemptions and modeling changes. Other projects had an average adjustment ratio of 0.884. Adjustments were made for operating schedules, COP values, and baseline model requirements, including recommendations for future arena projects.

Peak Demand Savings To establish evaluated peak demand savings, the Evaluator averaged the monthly peak demand reductions calculated in the revised energy models for the months of December, January, and February. The differences between tr...

AI summary To evaluate peak demand savings, the Evaluator used revised energy models and averaged monthly peak demand reductions for December, January, and February. Adjustments to the models, such as removing lighting energy savings, led to an average adjustment ratio of 0.954 for gross peak demand savings, with a margin of error of 14.8%. A separate large project had an adjustment ratio of 0.551.

9.2.5 Evaluated Gross Savings The 2021 gross energy and peak demand savings calculated for New Construction are presented in [Table](#page-73-2) 25 below. They were obtained by applying the average adjustment ratios of 0.884 on energy savi...

AI summary The 2021 gross energy and peak demand savings for New Construction are calculated with average adjustment ratios of 0.884 and 0.954, respectively, except for a large project with different ratios. The overall adjustments were 0.839 for energy and 0.898 for peak demand. Savings at the generator were calculated using line loss factors provided by NS Power, resulting in 11.218 GWh energy savings and 3.394 MW peak demand savings.

Table 25: Evaluated 2021 New Construction Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2021 Number of Projects 21 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 12.529 Adjustment Ratio...

AI summary Table 25 presents the evaluated 2021 new construction gross energy and peak demand savings, including metrics like tracked energy savings, adjustment ratios, and line loss factors, as well as lifetime energy savings and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.

11.1 Tracking Sheet Audit To ensure service results were reliably compiled, the Evaluator first performed a tracking sheet audit aimed at verifying the completeness and consistency of the data submitted by EOne. The verification and correc...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted a tracking sheet audit to verify the completeness and consistency of data submitted by EOne, ensuring reliable compilation of service results. Corrective actions are detailed in Appendix I, and the reported tracked savings reflect the corrected figures.

11.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to changes in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by Building Optimization participants regardless of why they participated. This subsection describes the review methodology used for...

AI summary Gross savings are calculated based on changes in energy consumption from Building Optimization projects, using data from applicants and EOne, and supplemented with engineering assumptions where necessary. The methodology follows best practices for measurement and verification in commercial and industrial energy efficiency projects.

11.2.1 Project Review Findings As a result of the Evaluator review, adjustments were made to the savings of one of the six projects in the service. For that project, the Evaluator identified an error in the electrical heating efficiency va...

AI summary An Evaluator identified an error in the electrical heating efficiency value used in energy consumption calculations for one of six projects, leading to an overestimation of energy savings. The efficiency was corrected from 80% to 100%, resulting in an adjustment ratio of 0.934 for energy savings. No revisions were made to peak demand savings for Building Optimization projects.

11.2.3 Effective Useful Life The Evaluator validated the EUL values based on the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment. The EUL values are used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The Evaluator re...

AI summary The Evaluator validated EUL values based on the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment and adjusted one project's EUL from five to three years, citing the implementation of modified scheduling control parameters in the central building automation system.

Table 30: Evaluated 2021 Building Optimization Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Started and Completed in 2021 Number of Projects 6 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.494 Adjust...

AI summary Table 30 provides an evaluation of 2021 Building Optimization Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings, including metrics such as energy savings, adjustment ratios, and lifetime energy savings. The table indicates that six projects were completed, resulting in 0.462 GWh of gross energy savings at the meter and zero peak demand savings.

11.3.4 Evaluated Net Savings Net savings represent the savings that can be reliably attributed to a service. For Building Optimization, net savings are calculated by applying the NTGR value in the following equation: Net Savings = Gross Sa...

AI summary Net savings for Building Optimization are calculated using the NTGR value, with 2021 net energy savings estimated at 0.444 GWh at the generator, representing 1.332 GWh in lifetime net energy savings and a weighted average EUL of 3.0 years.

Table 32: Evaluated 2021 Building Optimization Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2021 Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.462 NTGR 0.905 Net Energy Savings Without True-up...

AI summary Table 32 presents evaluated 2021 Building Optimization Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings. The table shows energy savings at the meter and generator, as well as peak demand savings, with a focus on net energy savings and their impact on avoided CO2 emissions.

Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value Energy Savings Tracked Savings by EOne 0.525 GWh 0.81 0.426 GWh Evaluation Results 0.491 GWh 0.91 0.444 GWh 104% Peak Demand Savings Tracked Savings by EOne...

AI summary The table presents energy and peak demand savings tracked and evaluated by EOne, including gross and net savings values and realization rates. The section highlights the 2021 Building Optimization Impact Evaluation results.

12 OVERALL SAVINGS FOR CUSTOM A comparison of the energy and peak demand savings values established through this evaluation and those tracked by EOne is presented in [Table](#page-86-1) 35. The realization rate, representing the ratio of e...

AI summary The evaluation compares energy and peak demand savings values established through the process with those tracked by EOne, showing realization rates of 105% for energy savings and 111% for peak demand savings.

2021 Custom-Finding: Participant satisfaction with Custom continues to be very high across the three services. Participant satisfaction was also high with the OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot. All participants rated the OEM Operational...

AI summary Participant satisfaction with the Custom program and the OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot is very high, with all participants rating the service between 8 and 10. The Evaluator adjusted energy and peak demand savings for various programs, with adjustment ratios varying across services. More robust M&V methodologies could reduce future adjustments.

2021 Custom-Finding: Both the evaluated net energy and peak demand savings determined by the Evaluator were higher than the savings tracked by EOne. Evaluated gross energy and peak demand savings were slightly lower than those tracked by E...

AI summary The 2021 Custom-Finding indicates that evaluated net energy and peak demand savings were 11% and 5% higher than those tracked by EOne, primarily due to lower free-ridership rates and positive true-up adjustments to Retrofit projects.

2021 OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot Finding: M&V methodologies for peak reduction projects can be further refined. One of the three projects required the Evaluator to change the M&V methodology, which led to a reduction in evaluated...

AI summary The 2021 OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot found that M&V methodologies for peak reduction projects need refinement. Whole building approaches are not suitable for small projects, and system-level methods are more appropriate. The Evaluator recommends improved M&V protocols and guidance for future operational demand programs, including handling load-shifting projects and ensuring savings are well outside margin of error.

14.1 EMIS Description EMIS offers incentives in the form of incentives or zero-percent on-bill financing to help facilities reduce their electricity consumption through the implementation of an energy management information system. EMIS as...

AI summary EMIS provides incentives and zero-percent on-bill financing to help industrial businesses and institutions reduce electricity consumption through energy management information systems. Participants must sign a letter of intent with EOne, undergo an audit, develop an implementation plan, and install metering equipment. EMIS also offers ongoing support and can be combined with Strategic Energy Management (SEM). The program aimed for 0.300 GWh in net electricity savings in 2021.

16.2 Tracking Sheet Audit To ensure program component results are reliably compiled, the Evaluator first performed a tracking sheet audit aimed at verifying the completeness and consistency of the data submitted by EOne. The verification a...

AI summary The Evaluator conducted a tracking sheet audit to verify the completeness and consistency of data submitted by EOne, ensuring reliable compilation of program component results. Corrective actions are detailed in Appendix XV, and the report refers to corrected tracked savings.

16.3.4 Evaluated Gross Savings EMIS gross incremental energy and peak demand savings are listed in [Table](#page-102-1) 39 below. Gross incremental energy savings at the generator were established at 0.027 GWh while gross peak demand savin...

AI summary The document discusses evaluated gross savings from EMIS, including energy and peak demand savings at the generator level. It mentions the use of line loss factors from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update to estimate these savings, with a calculated EUL of two years.

18.1 SEM Description SEM provides industrial and institutional participants with funding and support to implement energy management practices within their organizations. SEM helps participants achieve continuous energy savings by offering...

AI summary The Smart Energy Management (SEM) program supports industrial and institutional participants in implementing energy management practices. It provides funding, structured approaches, and tools to achieve continuous energy savings. Participants must commit to 12 months of participation and can extend for a second year. SEM also offers energy audits, training, and tools for performance monitoring and reporting.

Figure 17: 2021 SEM Participation Process Summary Eligibility Check, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and Kick-off Meeting - Once approved, eligible participants must first sign a MOU that outlines the project scope, participant requirem...

AI summary The 2021 SEM Participation Process Summary outlines the steps for eligibility, data collection, energy modeling, and the establishment of energy teams and policies. It also discusses performance-based incentives for energy savings, with different rates for participants in the Large Industrial initiative versus others. SEM aimed to generate 3.00 GWh of net electrical energy savings and 0.310 MW of peak demand savings in 2020.

20.2 Gross Savings This subsection describes the methodology used to review the six SEM projects that generated savings in 2021 and summarizes the review findings. Interactive effects, EUL values, and revised gross savings are also assesse...

AI summary This subsection outlines the methodology used to evaluate six SEM projects that generated savings in 2021, focusing on incremental savings reported by EOne. It also discusses interactive effects, EUL values, and revised gross savings.

20.2.1 Project Review Findings The Evaluator reviewed the calculation methodologies for all six projects based on project documentation as well as the information obtained through interviews with participants and the service provider. The...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed six projects and made minor adjustments to energy savings calculations, primarily due to duplicate claims from BER Instant Rebates and insufficient M&V data. Adjustments resulted in a 99% realization rate for energy savings, with one measure to be resubmitted next year with improved M&V.

Table 1: Verification of 2021 Custom Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Particip...

AI summary Table 1 verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 custom data fields, indicating that most data fields are complete, except for Equivalent Net-to-gross Ratios, which required correction for three pilot projects.

- 99. Refused - C6. [IF [D5](#page-135-1) ≠ 98 OR 99] Did the energy modeling consultant help you assess different options available for building envelope and HVAC equipment? - 1. Yes - 2. No - 98. Don't know - 99. Refused - C7. You have r...

AI summary This section includes questions about the energy modeling consultant's role in assessing building envelope and HVAC equipment options, as well as the impact of an incentive from Efficiency Nova Scotia on the design of energy-efficient buildings.

COVID Impact for Measure #1 Include notes on how calculated savings are impacted by COVID, if so. Detail any adjustment, along with the rational, needed to bring back the savings to a typical year. 10 .Has this measure been impacted by COV...

AI summary The document outlines a table and notes for assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on energy efficiency measures, including questions about occupancy, production schedules, baseline periods, and adjustments to savings calculations. It also covers peak demand savings and interactive effects related to heating and cooling systems.

Sections below to be filled aft er the visit 6. Estimated Useful Life of the project Type of replacement Measure #1 Measure #2 Tracked Project EUL (yrs) Evaluated Project EUL (yrs) EUL Refer to project documentation for tracked baseline EU...

AI summary The document provides a template for recording project details, including estimated useful life, energy and demand savings, and adjustments made during the evaluation process. It includes sections for tracking electricity and peak demand savings, as well as adjustments to these figures and the peak coincidence factor.

Virtual visit, call or document 3. Virtual Visit, Call or Document Review Summary 4. Adjustments to Energy Model per Measure The reviewer must verify the model following guidance defined in the tab "Modelling Review Checklist". Description...

AI summary The document outlines the process for reviewing energy models during a virtual visit, call, or document review. It emphasizes the need for the reviewer to verify the model according to the 'Modelling Review Checklist' and includes sections for comparing the project documentation, participant modeling, and changes made by Econoler.

1. Results General Overview - › Check savings (in %) for each end use and identify where the major savings lie. Crosscheck with the energy efficiency measure list to validate if the savings claimed make sense. - › Verify GJ/m2 and check be...

AI summary The overview discusses verifying energy savings percentages across end uses and validating them against energy efficiency measures. It also emphasizes checking energy intensity metrics (GJ/m2) and benchmarking data to ensure consistency, noting that building differences (e.g., underground parking) can affect energy usage comparisons.

Tracked Savings Calculation For this project, EOne's on-site energy manager (OEM) created an energy model using PVWatts. This was used to estimate the system's projected annual electricity generation, which are is equivalent to the annual...

AI summary EOne's on-site energy manager used PVWatts to estimate the system's annual electricity generation, which was used to calculate tracked energy savings. The original estimate assumed a panel capacity of 310W and did not account for a revised system size. No peak demand savings were claimed due to negligible winter peak generation, confirmed by the Evaluator.

Revised Savings Calculation EOne's OEM created an updated PVWatts model to reflect the change in system size, which was shared with the Evaluator during the project review process. The updated model estimated an annual electricity generati...

AI summary EOne's OEM updated the PVWatts model to reflect a change in system size, resulting in an estimated annual electricity generation of 25,992 kWh. After installation, actual output over 92 days was 92% of the modeled output, leading to a revised annual energy savings estimate of 23,913 kWh. The adjustment ratio for energy savings was calculated as 0.923.

APPENDIX XIV CUSTOM: 2021 RECOMMENDATIONS Sections Recommendations OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot (Impact Evaluation) Further, for those projects that are limited to demand reduction measures affecting only the system peak (and by ex...

AI summary The document provides recommendations for the OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot and Retrofit programs. It suggests that EOne should consider offering annual incentives for demand reduction measures and implement a project closure timetable that aligns with evaluation activities.

COVID Did Covid had an impact on the implemented measures? Are the savings calculations impacted by Covid? Were any adjusments made by the SP regarding Covid? Are the reported savings based on a typical year? IMPACT EVALUATION NOTES Projec...

AI summary The text discusses impact evaluation and savings adjustments related to energy efficiency measures, focusing on baseline and reporting periods, regression equations, and adjustments for factors other than the energy conservation measure (ECM). It includes questions about the impact of COVID-19 on savings calculations and the adequacy of models used for evaluation.

Table 1: 2021 SEM Energy Savings Adjustments Project Tracked Savings (kWh) Evaluated Savings (kWh) Adjustment Ratio Explanation for Adjustment 1 255,977 250,470 97.8% The Evaluator applied a deduction for 2 BER Instant Rebates measures in...

AI summary Table 1 outlines energy savings adjustments for various projects in 2021, with discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings. Adjustments were made due to incomplete information, such as the deduction of savings for BER Instant Rebates and the removal of a lighting measure already claimed under BER Instant Savings.

Table 2: 2021 SEM Peak Demand Savings Adjustments Project Tracked Savings (kW) Evaluated Savings (kW) Adjustment Ratio Explanation for Adjustment 1 29.2 28.6 97.8% The reduction to the energy savings resulted in a proportional reduction of...

AI summary Table 2 details 2021 SEM Peak Demand Savings Adjustments for various projects, showing discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings. Adjustments are due to incorrect assumptions, removal of measures, and timing issues in claiming savings. Some projects had no adjustments, while others had significant reductions or corrections.

Table 4: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component, 2021 2021 Program Program Component Process Market Impact Direct Installation SBES - - Condensed Key findings, electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak dema...

AI summary Table 4 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in 2021, focusing on direct installation and SBES. Key findings include electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided greenhouse gas emissions.

1.2 Follow-up on Past Evaluation Report Recommendations No major improvement recommendations were made for SBES in 2020.

AI summary No major improvement recommendations were made for the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2020, as noted in the evaluation report.

1.3 Participation History As presented in [Figure](#page-28-1) 6 below, SBES participation reached 512 projects in 2021, nearly returning to 2019 levels after the large drop in participation observed in 2020. This increase appears to have...

AI summary The SBES program saw increased participation in 2021, reaching 512 projects, driven by incentive increases and the CDI pilot. DIY projects remain the most popular, contributing 96% of energy savings. Energy and peak demand savings rose significantly in 2021, nearing 2019 levels.

GHG Emission Reduction Calculations To obtain net avoided GHG emissions in CO 2 eq for SBES, the Evaluator multiplied the net energy savings by the latest Nova Scotia-specific factor for GHG emissions generated by electricity production. T...

AI summary The document discusses how net avoided GHG emissions for SBES are calculated by multiplying net energy savings by a Nova Scotia-specific factor derived from NS Power data. It references the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment, which provides parameters for calculating energy and peak demand savings from EOne's DSM program portfolio.

4.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants regardless of their reasons for participating. 6 For each SBES Audit or DIY project, EOne calculates gross savings...

AI summary Gross savings refer to energy consumption changes due to participant actions. In 2021, lighting measures made up 99% of implemented SBES measures and contributed 82% of total savings. Calculations are done using the CIRx Screening Tool or custom methods.

4.2.1 Summary of 2021 Gross Savings Adjustments As part of the 2019 evaluation, the Evaluator conducted site visits (n=50) to establish adjustment ratios and determine evaluated savings. Based on the observations made on site and an analys...

AI summary The 2021 Gross Savings Adjustments were based on 2019 adjustment ratios calculated from site visits and evaluations of 50 projects. These ratios were applied to all energy savings due to low margins of error. For the CDI pilot, different savings calculation methods were used, and 2019 EPI adjustment ratios were applied instead of SBES ratios.

br>No change Pole/Arm-mounted Area Luminaires 13.7 No change Pole/Arm-mounted Decorative Luminaires 22.8 No change Parking Garage Luminaires 22.8 No change Case Lighting for Sign Retrofit Applications 11.6 No change LED Directional and Arc...

AI summary The table lists the 2021 SBES Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values for various lighting products, with no changes noted across all categories listed.

4.2.6 Evaluated Gross Savings Total gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator were respectively 0.190 GWh and 0.034 MW for the Audit path, 10.643 GWh and 2.321 MW for the DIY path, and 0.272 GWh and 0.043 MW for the Commercial...

AI summary The document provides evaluated gross savings for different energy efficiency programs, including the Audit path, DIY path, and Commercial Direct Instal (CDI) pilot, with specific figures for energy and peak demand savings at the generator. Line loss factors were applied to calculate savings, referencing a 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update submitted to the NSUARB.

Table 12: Evaluated 2021 SBES Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings – All Paths Program Path Audit DIY CDI Pilot Total Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.177 9.950 0.248 10.376 Line Loss Factor 1.071 1.070 1.096 - Gr...

AI summary Table 12 presents evaluated 2021 SBES gross energy and peak demand savings across different program paths, including Audit, DIY, and CDI Pilot. The table includes metrics like gross energy savings, line loss factors, and lifetime energy savings. Differences between tracked and evaluated savings are attributed to changes in unitary savings for the CDI pilot.

[IF PROJECT TYPE=DIY AND LIGHTING=YES, ASK D1 TO D9; OTHERWISE SKIP TO HVAC SECTION] The next questions will be about the lighting upgrades that were rebated and/or financed through the Small Business Energy Solutions Program and installed...

AI summary The text outlines a conditional set of questions related to lighting upgrades under the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, specifically asking whether the business had already decided to install energy-efficient lighting before learning about the program.

Table 1: Verification of 2021 SBES Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Participan...

AI summary Table 1 verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 SBES data fields. Issues identified include negative energy savings without justification, zero demand savings with no explanation, and missing rate codes. The evaluator made assumptions to address these gaps.

Table 3: Verification of 2021 SBES Data Field Consistency Data Field 1 Data Field 2 Consistent (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Calculated Line Loss Factor (Gross Energy Savings at the Generator / Gross Energy Savings at the Met...

AI summary This text presents two tables verifying data consistency in the 2021 SBES and Commercial Direct Install Pilot programs. Key findings include inconsistencies in energy savings data at the measure and project levels, with corrective actions taken by the evaluator.

Table 5: Verification of 2021 SBES Savings Compilation Program Component Result Valid Equation? (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Gross Energy Savings at the Generator Partial No adjustment ratios were applied by EOne. The Evalua...

AI summary The document presents verification results for energy savings from the 2021 SBES and Commercial Direct Install Pilot programs. It highlights inconsistencies in the application of adjustment ratios and line loss factors, with evaluators making corrections where necessary.

Table 7: 2021 SBES Corrected Tracked Savings Program Component Result Value Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Relative Difference Value Unit Value Unit Value SBES Gross Energy Savings at the Generator 11.099 GWh 10.832 GWh -2.4% Gros...

AI summary Table 7 shows the 2021 SBES corrected tracked savings, revealing a decrease in energy and peak demand savings compared to EOne's tracked values. The Evaluator adjusted the savings by incorporating an adjustment ratio and correcting missing line loss factors, which slightly increased some savings.

Measure Additional Notes Unitary Energy Savings Value Unitary Peak Demand Savings Value EUL Value - (kWh/year) (W) (years) 9.5 W Replacing 100 W 326 53.4 3.5 9.5 W Replacing 150 W 506 82.9 3.2 18 W Replacing 75 W 205 33.6 4.1 18 W Replacin...

AI summary The document presents a table of energy savings measures, including the unitary energy savings value, unitary peak demand savings value, and effective useful life (EUL) value for various lighting and hot water efficiency programs. The data reflects the impact of replacing traditional lighting with more efficient alternatives and reducing hot water usage through flow rate reductions and insulation.

3.1.2 Activities Included in Programs All programs included in this jurisdictional scan used multiple activities to influence a variety of market actors, from the legislator to the end user. Those activities include: - › Lending specialize...

AI summary The text outlines various activities included in energy efficiency programs within the jurisdiction, such as code development, training, enforcement support, incentive programs, marketing, and public tool development to drive market transformation and code standardization.

ABBREVIATIONS AHRI Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute ARet Appliance Retirement program ASHP Air-source heat pump ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers BER Business Energy Reba...

AI summary This section provides a list of abbreviations and their full forms, primarily related to energy efficiency, building systems, and regulatory frameworks. It includes terms from industry standards, programs, and organizations relevant to energy management and policy.

Table 98: EPI Smart Power Controller for Audiovisual Equipment Installation Rate 101 Table 99: Power Bars with Integrated Timer Measure Summary 102 Table 100: Electrical Unitary Savings Value for Power Bars with Integrated Timers 103 Table...

AI summary The document contains a series of tables detailing energy efficiency measures, including savings values for various lighting, heating, and water heating technologies. These tables are part of an analysis of energy efficiency programs and their impact on energy consumption and savings.

Program Components Plug Load Controls EPI Smart Power Controller for Audiovisual Equipment Instant Savings Power Bar with Integrated Timer Instant Savings Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Instant Savings ENERGY STAR® Certified Pool Pump Instant Sa...

AI summary The document outlines various program components under different categories such as Plug Load Controls, Demand Reduction, Lighting, Pumps, Space Heating, and Water Heating. These components include initiatives like the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, Home Energy Assessment (HEA), and Business Energy Rebates (BER).

Value fo or EPI Value for Parameter Symbol Single-family Homes Apartments Instant Savings Source Temperature Rise in Electrical Water Heater [°F] ΔT H2O 79 2011 OPA Electrical Water Heater Efficiency η 97% Pennsylvania Public Utility Commi...

AI summary The table presents key parameters and values related to energy efficiency programs, including temperature rise in electrical water heaters, efficiency percentages, unit conversions, and energy savings from flow rate reductions. These data points are used to evaluate the performance and impact of energy efficiency initiatives.

Table 60: Solar Air Heating Measure Summary Parameter Green Heat HEA Reference Measure Description and Ider Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Solar air heating sys tems N/A Additional Notes - IVA General Parameters...

AI summary Table 60 provides a summary of solar air heating measures, including installation rates, useful life, and energy savings parameters. The table references specific subsections for detailed calculations and explanations.

Table 65: Programmable Thermostat Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings, MHEEP Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Programmable thermostats to reduce electricity consumption N/A Additional Notes - Gener...

AI summary The document provides a summary of the programmable thermostat measure, including its installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. It outlines the measure's description, energy savings, and peak demand-to-energy ratio.

Table 72: Clothesline and Outdoor Drying Rack Measure Summary Parameter EPI Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Clotheslines and outdoor drying racks to reduce electricity consumption of dry...

AI summary Table 72 summarizes the Clothesline and Outdoor Drying Rack Measure, focusing on energy savings parameters. It outlines installation rates, useful life, and energy savings in kWh/year. The table also references subsections for detailed calculations and assumptions.

Summary [Table](#page-30-0) 75 presents a summary of the values used to calculate refrigerator retirement and replacement savings. The detailed methodology follows.

AI summary Table 75 summarizes the values used to calculate refrigerator retirement and replacement savings, with the detailed methodology provided in the following sections.

Electrical Unitary Energy Savings The following equations are used to determine the electrical unitary energy savings value of retired and replaced refrigerators. ℎ = × × × − $$AvgConsumptionPerSize = \sum (ConsumptionPerSize \times \%Manu...

AI summary The document outlines the calculation methodology for electrical unitary energy savings from retired and replaced refrigerators. It uses data from various sources, including metering activity results, tracking sheets, and energy consumption ratings, to determine average annual energy consumption for different refrigerator models and programs.

retirement and replacement measures. 112 Econoler, Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program – 2017 DSM Evaluation , Final Report presented to Efficiency Nova Scotia, March 15, 2018. 113 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Effi...

AI summary The text references various energy efficiency programs and regulations, including evaluations of residential efficient product rebate programs and energy conservation standards for refrigeration products. It cites reports from Econoler, Natural Resources Canada, and the U.S. Department of Energy, as well as ENERGY STAR's product certification tools.

For both ARet and Instant Savings, dehumidifier electrical unitary energy savings are calculated using the equation below. $$Energy \, Savings_{\,kWh} = AWRC \times AOD \times \left(\frac{1}{EF_{base}} - \frac{1}{EF_{new}}\right)$$ For ARe...

AI summary The document outlines the calculation of energy savings for dehumidifiers under the ARet and Instant Savings programs, using specific energy factor values derived from regulatory guidelines and the 2011 OPA Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report. The calculations assume replacement of units rather than mere retirement.

Parameter ARet Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Replacement of old clothes dryers to reduce electricity consumption ENERGY STAR certified clothes dryers to reduce electricity consumption...

AI summary The table outlines the parameters for the Appliance Retirement (ARET) Instant Savings program, including measure descriptions, installation rates, useful life, and energy savings. It provides details on unitary energy savings, peak demand-to-energy ratio, and calculated peak demand savings for replacing old clothes dryers with ENERGY STAR certified models.

Table 86: Clothes Washer Energy Consumption Parameter Value for Standard Clothes Washer Value for Efficient Clothes Washer Source Number of Loads [Loads/Year] 29 00 Hydro-Québec 130 Capacity [L] 127 Weighted average capacity based on 10 mo...

AI summary The text provides a table comparing energy consumption parameters for standard and efficient clothes washers, including load numbers, capacity, and energy factor. It also introduces a section on water heating adjustment, indicating a potential discussion on energy efficiency and consumption adjustments.

Table 96: Smart Power Controllers for Audiovisual Equipment Measure Summary Parameter EPI Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Smart power controllers equipment to reduce ele N/A Additional N...

AI summary The table outlines the energy savings parameters for Smart Power Controllers for Audiovisual Equipment, including installation rates, useful life, and unitary energy savings for two tiers of power strips.

Table 101: Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Heavy-duty outdoor timers to reduce electricity consumption N/A Additional Notes - General P...

AI summary Table 101 provides a summary of the Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, unitary energy savings, and peak demand-to-energy ratio. The table outlines the measure's energy and demand savings characteristics.

Table 103: ENERGY STAR Certified Pool Pump Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description ENERGY STAR certified pool pumps to reduce electricity consumption N/A Additional Not...

AI summary This table provides a summary of the ENERGY STAR certified pool pump measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, and electrical savings. The measure aims to reduce electricity consumption through the use of energy-efficient pool pumps.

3 BNI MEASURE GROSS SAVINGS PARAMETERS The following sections outline all necessary parameters to calculate gross energy savings for BER Instant Rebates semi-prescriptive measures as well as measures added to the BER Mail-in and SBES offer...

AI summary This section outlines the parameters needed to calculate gross energy savings for BER Instant Rebates semi-prescriptive measures and additional measures added to the BER Mail-in and SBES offerings between 2020 and 2022.

3.1.1 Interactive Effects For indoor lighting measures offered through BER Instant Rebates, the interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings used are based on the average values of indoor lighting products installed throu...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of interactive effects factors for indoor and outdoor lighting measures offered through BER Instant Rebates, SBES, and Mail-in programs. The factors are based on average values from 2019 installations and adjusted for recessed fixtures. Outdoor lighting measures have no interactive effects.

Peak Coincidence Factor For indoor lighting measures offered through Instant Rebates, the peak coincidence factor (PCF) for indoor products is based on the average PCF value of indoor lighting products installed through BER Mail-in and SBE...

AI summary The document explains the calculation of the peak coincidence factor (PCF) for indoor and outdoor lighting measures under different rebate programs. For indoor lighting, the PCF is based on historical data from 2019, while a fixed 100% PCF is applied to outdoor lighting due to predictable usage patterns.

Table 127: Occupancy/Motion Sensor Measure Summary Parameter BER Instant Rebates Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Occupancy/N Notion sensors Additional Notes Ceiling or wall remote-mounted or wall switch...

AI summary Table 127 provides a summary of occupancy/motion sensor measures, including details on energy savings, useful life, and other parameters. It outlines electrical savings parameters such as unitary energy savings, peak demand savings, and interactive effects factors, with references to specific subsections for further details.

Summary Table 134 presents a summary of the values used to calculate booster pump savings. The detailed methodology follows.

AI summary Table 134 summarizes the values used to calculate booster pump savings, with a detailed methodology provided in the following content.

Table 135: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Booster Pumps Parameter Symbol BER-MI BER-IR Source Rated horsepower of the new booster pump or pumping system [HP] 𝐻𝑃𝑒𝑒 Based on specification data for each installed system 0.7376 MI: 2020...

AI summary Table 135 provides electrical unitary savings values for booster pumps, including rated horsepower, energy savings per horsepower, and annual energy savings calculations. The table includes data from the 2020 Hawaii TRM and other sources.

Table 159: Hot Water Tank Wrap Measure Summary Parameter SBES Reference Measure Description and Identifi cation Measure Description Hot water tank wrap to reduce hot water consumption N/A Additional Notes - General Parameters Installation...

AI summary Table 159 provides a summary of the Hot Water Tank Wrap Measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, energy savings, and peak demand savings. It references subsections of the document for detailed calculations and definitions.

Table 163: EUL Values for BNI LED Lamps and Fixtures 1 Measure Program Component Average Rated Lifetime (hours) Annual HOU (hours/year) Equipment Life 2021 Equivalent EUL LED Linear Fixtures 1 x 4 Luminaires BER Instant Rebates, BER Mail-i...

AI summary Table 163 presents Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values for various BNI LED lamps and fixtures, including details on average rated lifetime, annual hours of use, equipment life, and EUL for different product categories and programs.

Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Space Heating Mini-split Heat Pumps Green Heat, HEA 18 GDS, 2007 (Table 1 – Residential Measures, value for AC/heat pumps) Central Air-source Heat Pumps Green Heat, HEA 18 GDS, 2007 (Table 1,...

AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures and their associated Energy Use Labels (EUL) values for residential heating systems, including heat pumps, wood stoves, and air sealing kits. The EUL values are derived from sources such as the Green Development Standards (GDS) and the U.S. Department of Energy.

Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Efficient Clothes Washers Instant Savings 11 ENERGY STAR Calculator, 2016 (Value for clothes washers) DOE, Building Energy Data Book, 2011, Table 5.7.15 (Value for clothes washers) DEER, 2014...

AI summary The table outlines various energy efficiency measures and their associated savings values, including efficient clothes washers, smart power controllers, and energy-efficient pool pumps. These measures are part of broader efficiency programs and are sourced from various studies and organizations.

Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Other New Homes NHC 30 (Tier 1 & 2) 36 (Tier 3) The EUL values were established by calculating the weighted average EUL of insulation, heating system, and lighting measures. The difference in...

AI summary The document discusses the establishment of Energy Use Label (EUL) values for new homes and space heating measures under various programs. EUL values are calculated based on weighted averages of insulation, heating systems, and lighting measures. The values are considered valid based on a literature review and 2017 evaluations.

Table 165: EUL Values and Sources for Non-LED Lighting BNI Measures Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Lighting Occupancy Sensors BER Instant Rebates, BER Mail-in, SBES 10 GDS, 2007 (Table 2 – Commercial & Industrial Measures,...

AI summary Table 165 lists energy use label (EUL) values and sources for non-LED lighting BNI measures, including occupancy sensors, heat pads, ventilation fans, and various agricultural equipment. EUL values are derived from multiple sources such as the IESO PMA List, KEMA studies, and technical reference manuals.

Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Compressed Air Air Entraining Air Nozzles BER Mail-in, SBES 15 KEMA, 2009 (Value for compressed air nozzles) Cycling Air Dryers BER Mail-in, SBES 10 KEMA, 2009 (Value for cycling air dryers)...

AI summary The table outlines various energy efficiency measures, their associated programs, EUL values, and sources. It includes details on compressed air systems, HVAC systems, and other efficiency-related components, with corresponding program names and values derived from different studies and standards.

Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Kitchen Demand-controlled Kitchen Exhausts BER Mail-in, SBES 15 Efficiency Maine TRM, 2019 (Value for demand control kitchen ventilation) DEER, 2014 (Value for variable speed drives controlle...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing various energy efficiency measures, their associated programs, and their EUL values. The data includes appliances such as dishwashers, freezers, fryers, and laundry equipment, with associated program components like BER Mail-in and SBES, and references to sources like DEER 2014 and the DOE.

DHW Measures Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Water Heating Electrical-to-natural Gas Water Heating BER Mail-in, SBES 15 KEMA, 2009 (Value for water heaters, Ag o Heat Pump Water Heaters BER Mail-in, SBES 10 DEER, 2008, 2014...

AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures under the DHW (Domestic Hot Water) category, including water heating, solar, pool, and IT & datacenters. Each measure includes program components, EUL values, and sources. These measures are part of the BNI Efficient Product Rebates Program and SBES (BNI Building Efficiency Service).

Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Ventilation Measures Custom NC 20 Based on the EUL value of heat recovery ventilators Motor Equipment Custom NC 15 Based on the EUL value of energy efficient motors Other Custom NC 15 Reasona...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency measures and their associated Energy Use Label (EUL) values, including ventilation, motor equipment, refrigeration, and renewable power generation. It also details Building Optimization (BOpt) and Energy Management components, such as Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS) and Strategic Energy Management (SEM), with specific calculation methods for persistency.

APPENDIX II DETAILED CALCULATIONS OF 2021 EQUIVALENT EUL VALUES FOR LED LAMPS AND FIXTURES This appendix presents how the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of LED lamps and fixtures were calculated for applicable measures in the EPI,...

AI summary This appendix explains the calculation of equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for LED lamps and fixtures in the EPI, Instant Savings, BER, and SBES programs. The EUL is determined by comparing manufacturer-rated lifetimes with annual HOU values used for savings calculations.

Rationale for Using an Equivalent EUL The LED market is evolving rapidly, driven in part by government regulations. LED products installed today are likely to become the baseline before the end of their rated lifetime since LED technologie...

AI summary The rationale for using an equivalent EUL (Energy Use Label) is based on the rapid evolution of LED technology and government regulations, such as the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2020. Some jurisdictions use a higher baseline to reflect future savings, reducing the equivalent EUL applied to first-year savings. Uncertainty remains about the timing of compliance enforcement for new lighting standards.

Table 168: Equivalent EUL Calculation Summary for LED A19 Lamps Replaced Lamp (W) Typical Efficient Lamp (W) Baseline Incandescent Baseline 1 Year (2021) Displaced Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation216,217 2 Years (2022-2...

AI summary Table 168 provides a summary of equivalent EUL (Energy Use Label) calculations for LED A19 lamps compared to various traditional lighting technologies, including incandescent, halogen incandescent, and CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lamp) equivalents, based on legislation and energy efficiency standards.

Table 169: Equivalent EUL Calculation Summary for LED Reflector Lamps Replaced Lamp (W) Replaced Lamp (W) Typical Efficient Lamp (W) 3 Years (2 Baseline 2021-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislation 220 22 Years (2024-2045) Bas...

AI summary Table 169 provides a summary of equivalent EUL calculations for LED reflector lamps, comparing wattage values for replaced lamps, typical efficient lamps, and equivalent EUL over different time periods. The table includes various lamp types such as PAR20, PAR30, PAR38, and GU10, along with their respective wattage and EUL values.

Table 172: Equivalent EUL Calculation Summary for LED Non-A-type Lamps (Excluding R, BR, and Decorative Lamps) Average Average Wattage of Replaced Efficient Halogen Baseline 3 Years (2021-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislatio...

AI summary Table 172 presents a summary of equivalent EUL calculations for LED non-A-type lamps, excluding R, BR, and decorative lamps. It compares the average wattage of replaced efficient lamps with halogen and CFL equivalents, highlighting energy savings and equivalent EUL over a 5-year period.

Table 173: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Recessed Downlight Fixtures Average Replaced Lamp Average Wattage of Efficient Lamp (W) (W) Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation 3 Years (2021-2023) CF...

AI summary Table 173 summarizes the equivalent effective useful life calculation for LED recessed downlight fixtures, comparing halogen incandescent and CFL baselines. It highlights energy savings and EUL based on wattage and replacement data.

Table 174: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Fixtures Without Motion Sensors Average Replaced Lamp Average Wattage of Efficient - Canadian lalogen Incandescent Baseline - Canadian Legislation 3 Years (2021-2023)...

AI summary Table 174 provides a summary of the equivalent effective useful life calculation for LED fixtures without motion sensors, showing energy savings and equivalent EUL. The table includes data on average replaced lamp wattage, baseline wattage, and lifetime energy savings, with the equivalent EUL calculated at 7.4 years.

Table 175: Lifetime Energy Savings for LED Fixtures with Motion Sensors – Reduced Wattage Replaced Ffficient Wattage of Halogen Incande - Canadian 3 Years (20 Legislation CFL Equivale American Le 22 Years (2 Lifetime Energy Savings (W) Lam...

AI summary Table 175 presents the lifetime energy savings for LED fixtures with motion sensors, comparing wattage and energy savings across different lighting technologies. The table includes baseline and displaced wattage for various lamps and highlights the energy savings in kilowatt-hours.

Table 176: Lifetime Energy Savings for LED Fixtures with Motion Sensors – Reduced Hours of Use New Average Hours of Use (hours per day) Lifetime Energy Savings (kWh) 4.72 2.92 22.2 10.0 146 The total lifetime energy savings of 1,041 kWh we...

AI summary Table 176 presents lifetime energy savings for LED fixtures with motion sensors, showing a reduction in hours of use and corresponding energy savings. The equivalent energy use label (EUL) was calculated as 8.1 years based on total savings and first-year savings.

EfficiencyOne (E1) is pleased to provide its 2021 Annual Progress report (APR). The report summarizes E1's 2021 Demand Side Management (DSM) results and activities as administrator and operator of the Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) franchise...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) reported its 2021 Annual Progress Report, showing 109.4 GWh in net energy savings and 27.5 MW in net peak demand savings. E1 did not meet its 2021 targets due to the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, but showed a quicker recovery compared to 2020. E1 is working to meet its three-year contractual energy savings targets but may not meet the demand savings threshold.

2.1.1 Forecast for 2020-2022 DSM Plan Period E1 has provided an updated three-year Plan period forecast in [Table 1](#page-11-1) to provide stakeholders and the NSUARB with additional insight on mid-term DSM Plan implementation.[7](#page-9...

AI summary E1 provides a three-year forecast for the 2020-2022 DSM Plan, projecting energy savings of 127.0 GWh in 2022 (90% of the target threshold) but not meeting the system-peak demand savings target. Expenditures remain within the approved $110 million investment level, though unforeseen circumstances could lead to falling short of energy savings goals.

Table 1: 2020-2022 DSM Plan Period Forecast 2020-2022 DSM Plan Period Forecast Plan Year Er nergy Savir (GWh) ngs De mand Savi ings Expenditures ($ million) , rear Plan as Filed 1 Results/ Forecast Variance Plan as Filed 1 Results/ Forecas...

AI summary Table 1 outlines the 2020-2022 DSM Plan Period Forecast, showing energy savings and expenditures for each year. The underspend from 2020 was reinvested in 2021 and 2022 E1 DSM activities, with E1's 2022 planned investment aimed at operationalizing the DSM Plan.

4 Table 2: 2021 Results to 2021 Plan as Filed, Mid-Course Adjustments, and 2021 Year-End Forecast 12 2021 Plan as Filed 1 2021 Mid-Course Adjustment 2021 Forecast (Year-end) 2021 Results Results to Forecast Results to Mid-Course First-Year...

AI summary The text presents Table 2, which compares 2021 results to the 2021 plan as filed, mid-course adjustments, and the 2021 year-end forecast. It includes metrics such as energy savings, peak demand, and budget figures for various programs and initiatives.

1 2.3 2021 Unit Cost Data - 2 [Table 4](#page-17-1) below presents unit cost data for the 2021 Plan as filed, 2021 mid-course adjustments, - 3 2021 year-end forecast, and 2021 results. In 2021, E1 achieved an overall unit cost of $0.33/kWh...

AI summary Table 4 presents 2021 unit cost data for E1, showing an achieved cost of $0.33/kWh aligning with the Plan's filed $0.32/kWh and year-end forecast of $0.33/kWh. This demonstrates alignment between actual performance and projections.

7 Table 4: 2021 Unit Cost First-Year Unit Cost 2021 Plan as Filed1 ($/kWh) 2021 Mid-Course Adjustment ($/kWh) 2021 Year-End forecast ($/kWh) 2021 Results ($/kWh) Program Status2 Efficient Product Rebates 0.25 0.31 0.32 0.28 Instant Savings...

AI summary Table 4 outlines the 2021 unit costs for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including Efficient Product Rebates, Home Energy Assessment, and the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project, with costs varying between program categories and subcategories.

tial for average electrical savings per participant, as compared to the average electrical savings potential when HEA was available solely to electrically heated homes. 23 Ibid., at page 6. 24 Non-electrically heated homes are funded via t...

AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program expanded its scope to include non-electrically heated homes, funded by the Low Carbon Economy Fund and the Province of Nova Scotia. E1 piloted remote energy assessments and increased the cost of HEAs to reflect expanded service requirements. Marketing efforts were adjusted based on high enrolment and delivery partner capacity.

3.3 Business, Non-Profit and Institutional (BNI) Sector Results - The BNI sector is comprised of the following programs: - Efficient Product Rebates; - Custom Incentives; and - Direct Installation. - In 2021, the BNI sector achieved net in...

AI summary The BNI sector includes Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation programs. In 2021, the sector achieved energy and peak demand savings, with E1's On-site Energy Manager (OEM) initiative contributing to these results. Marketing efforts targeted various sectors, including small businesses, retail, and non-profits, through digital and in-store campaigns, virtual events, and website updates.

1 Table 9: Custom Incentives Program Results Custom Incentives (2021) Custom Incentives Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Expenditures ($ million) 2021 Results 25.2 6.4 6.8 2021 MCA Target 33.6 8.5 8.0 Program Components • Building...

AI summary Table 9 provides the results of the Custom Incentives Program in 2021, including energy savings, demand savings, and expenditures. The program offers technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to large businesses, non-profits, and institutional participants to reduce electricity consumption and demand. It includes components such as Building Optimization, New Construction, and Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS).

3.6.2 Commercial Demand Response Pilot 2021 activities included the development, design, and logistics for this pilot. The pilot will be conducted in two phases. Phase One - Phase One involves working with Siemens, NS Power's distributed e...

AI summary The Commercial Demand Response Pilot involves two phases with Siemens and a future aggregator. Phase One offers a $125/kW annual incentive for participation in demand response events, while Phase Two involves a competitive procurement process for an aggregator. The pilot aims to achieve energy savings and is aligned with the Custom program's incentive structure.

3.7 Additional 2021 Results and Updates - E1 has additional Performance Indicators (a set of particular performance metrics) that indicate - progress towards its Performance Targets.[51](#page-47-2) In 2021, the results of E1's additional...

AI summary In 2021, E1 achieved significant results from its energy efficiency programs, including lifetime ratepayer benefits of $175.4 million and annual avoided CO2e emissions of 63,911 tonnes. Customer satisfaction and awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia remained consistent with 2020 levels.

1 2021 Rate Class Results by Program - 2 Tables 2 through 7 provides a breakdown of the 2021 net incremental energy and net peak - 3 demand savings, expenditures, and participation achieved, by rate class, and within each - 4 program. 5

AI summary The text outlines the 2021 Rate Class Results by Program, providing a breakdown of net incremental energy and net peak demand savings, expenditures, and participation achieved, categorized by rate class and program.

6 Table 2: 2021 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Rate Class Results Residential Efficient Product Rebates (2021) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Expenditures ($ thousand) Units Re...

AI summary Table 2 presents the results of the 2021 Residential Efficient Product Rebates, showing energy and demand savings across various rate classes, along with expenditures and the number of units rebated. Savings are net of free-ridership and spillover effects and are pending verification.

1 Table 5: 2021 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Rate Class Results BNI Efficient Product Rebates (2021) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Expenditures ($ thousand) Units Rebated (#) Reside...

AI summary Table 5 presents the 2021 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Rate Class Results, detailing energy and demand savings, expenditures, and units rebated across various rate classes. The data includes first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, expenditures, and the number of units rebated for residential, commercial, and industrial categories.

Table 4: Update on Implementation of 2020 Verification Recommendations Year Evaluation/ Verification Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Expected Period of Completion 2017 Evaluation Develop a way for potential participants to bette...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation status of a 2020 recommendation to create a list of eligible ASHP equipment for the Green Heat Program. E1 made changes in 2020 to align with the NEEP list but excluded COP criteria due to potential impacts on rebate eligibility. E1 plans to continue monitoring the market rather than fully adopting the NEEP criteria for ASHP.

Table 9: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023-2025 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Av...

AI summary Table 9 outlines the investment and savings associated with various residential energy efficiency programs from 2023 to 2025, including details on energy savings, demand reductions, and costs. The data highlights the financial and energy impacts of initiatives like Efficient Product Rebates, Appliance Retirement, and Home Energy Assessments.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity and annual avoided $CO_2$ e emissions were provided by NS Power, from the 2020 IRP using the Base level of DSM for Scenario 2.0C. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by N...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs and emissions related to energy and capacity from NS Power's 2020 IRP, including DSM and DR programs. It outlines cost-effectiveness ratios and explains TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios, emphasizing the importance of NS Power's collaboration for DR benefits.

Verification Review: Program Year 2021 Towards practical and contextually sound measurement, analysis, and reporting 3 Table of Contents I. Introduction 7 II. How Savings Verification fits in the Policy, Planning, Program Cycle 7 III. Eval...

AI summary The document outlines a 2021 program verification and evaluation process for energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia. It discusses evaluation frameworks, standards, and results from Econoler, including net demand reduction and energy savings at the generator level. The report also covers individual program reviews and provides recommendations for improving evaluation efforts.

In [Figure 3,](#page-15-0) net first year energy savings (GWh) by DSM program component is shown in rank order, from lowest to highest. On a first-year net energy savings basis, the top three program components are Business Energy Rebates,...

AI summary The document presents data from Figure 3 and Figure 4, which show the ranking of DSM program components by net first-year energy savings and the split of net demand reduction at the generator by sector. Business Energy Rebates, Custom, and Instant Savings programs are the top contributors, while Energy Management Information Systems, Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project, Affordable Multifamily Housing, and Strategic Energy Management contribute less.

8. New Residential Program The New Home Construction Program is the single program component of the New Residential Program. There were 853 completions in 2021. The program encourages homeowners and builders to exceed building code require...

AI summary The New Residential Program in Nova Scotia encourages energy efficiency in new homes through incentives based on performance tiers. The program includes a structured evaluation process and achieved significant energy savings in 2021, exceeding the net savings target but falling slightly short of the demand reduction target. The evaluation was deemed excellent.

Water Heating Equipment Rebate Guide Equipment Information and Eligibility Criteria Equipment Eligibility Criteria Eligibility System Type Criteria Incentives Certification Requirements Install Requirements Three-Element replacing existing...

AI summary The Water Heating Equipment Rebate Guide outlines eligibility criteria and incentives for replacing existing oil-fired and electric domestic hot water systems with more efficient alternatives, such as three-element water heaters and solar thermal systems. Rebates are available for qualifying installations, with specific certification and installation requirements.

House Type Single detached Year built 1930 Square footage 1,863 sq ft Initial EnerGuide rating 138 GJ Final EnerGuide rating 86 GJ Rebate for basement wall insulation (100% of foundation, R-0 to R-12) $600 Rebate for basement header insula...

AI summary The document provides details on a single detached house built in 1930 with an initial EnerGuide rating of 138 GJ and a final rating of 86 GJ after energy efficiency upgrades. Rebates for insulation and air sealing are listed, along with the estimated cost of upgrades, annual savings, and a payback period of 4.3 years.

Some rules to keep in mind when installing new heating, hot water, or solar equipment: - Rebates are not available for the replacement of working equipment. If replacing non-working equipment, please contact us prior to making your purchas...

AI summary The text outlines rules for installing new heating, hot water, and solar equipment, including restrictions on rebates for replacing working equipment, eligibility requirements for rebates, and guidelines for heat pump rebates and installation practices.

Wood/Pellet Burning Equipment Rebates Equipment Eligibility Solar Thermal: Air-to-Air $400/ System OG-100 system certification by SRCC (Solar Rating and Certification Corporation) System Installation: must be designed for heating season op...

AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for wood/pellet burning equipment and other energy efficiency upgrades. It specifies eligibility criteria, rebate amounts, and installation requirements for solar thermal systems, air sealing, and windows, doors, and skylights.

To qualify for Electric Thermal Storage Unit Rebates, units must be replacing or supplementing electric resistance heating (e.g. electric baseboard or electric forced air furnace). Currently, non-electrically heated homes are not eligible...

AI summary To qualify for Electric Thermal Storage Unit Rebates, units must replace or supplement electric resistance heating. Non-electrically heated homes are not eligible. The central ETS provides a single incentive of $2,100 based on 5 kW demand savings.

- 17 Dollars Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average Measure Life (years) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available DR Capacity (MW) Cost (TI incl...

AI summary The table presents investment and energy savings data for years 2023 to 2025, including total investment, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and other metrics. The data is measured in millions of dollars and gigawatt-hours, with a note that real dollars are stated in 2022 values.

E1 Responses to Industrial Group (IG) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL - 1 Table 2 2023-2025 Alternate Scenario Investment and Savings Investment Restated in Real

AI summary This document contains E1's responses to information requests from the Industrial Group regarding investment and savings under the 2023-2025 Alternate Scenario, restated in real terms.

- 2 Dollars Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average Measure Life (years) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available DR Capacity (MW) Cost (Tf incl....

AI summary The table presents investment and energy savings data for years 2023 to 2025, showing increasing investments and energy savings over time. It includes metrics such as lifetime benefits, first-year and lifetime energy savings, and weighted average measure life. The total investment and savings are also provided, with a note that real dollars are restated in 2022 dollars.

low-income customers. 1 Request IR-09: 2 3 Reference: EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan Filing, Evidence, 4.2.4 Application of 4 Costs, Page 25 (Page 34/584 of PDF), Line 5 5 6 The avoided costs of transmission and distribution wer...

AI summary The text outlines information requests related to low-income customers, specifically concerning avoided transmission and distribution costs, carbon avoided costs, and fuel cost calculations. These requests are linked to EfficiencyOne's 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan Filing, with responses directed to previous filings and responses by EfficiencyOne and the Industrial Group.

2 Dollars Lifetime First-Year Lifetime Peak EE Available Total R esource Prog gram 2023-2025 Investment Benefits Energy Energy Demand DR Cost Te st (TRC) rator Cost 2023 2023 ($ million) ($ million) Savings Savings Savings Capacity incl. e...

AI summary The document presents a detailed financial and performance breakdown of various energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs in Nova Scotia from 2023 to 2025, including investment amounts, energy savings, and cost metrics. It outlines program-specific data for residential, business, and institutional programs, along with enabling strategies and DR initiatives.

1 Table 1: Summary of Diverse and Underserved Communities by Sector Investment ($ million) Sector 2023 2024 2025 Total Residential - EE Programs 11.3 11.7 12.1 35.2 BNI - EE Programs 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 Demand Response Programs 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5...

AI summary Table 1 summarizes the investment in energy efficiency and demand response programs across different sectors for the years 2023 to 2025. The residential and BNI sectors show increasing investments, while demand response programs also show slight growth.

E1 Responses to Industrial Group (IG) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-23: Reference: EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan Filing, Appendix A 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan; 3.4.1 Diverse & Underserved Communities, Page 5...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to the Industrial Group's (IG) request for detailed calculations regarding low-income investments and energy savings in the 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan. E1 refers to specific tables in Appendix A of the DSM Plan Application to explain the breakdown of the 21% Low-Income Investment and the basis for the 10% Low-Income Energy Savings.

- (b) Please refer to part (a) of this IR response. Request IR-24: Reference: EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan Filing, Appendix A - 2023-2025 DSM Plan, 7. Enabling Strategies, Page 124 (Page 222/584 of PDF) "Historically, E1 has i...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) has historically invested 10% of its total DSM Portfolio investment in Enabling Strategies. The response to IR-24(a) refers to Table 1 for the allocation of Enabling Strategies for each year of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, using a methodology based on the percentage of program costs. No Education and Outreach costs were allocated to industrial classes in this plan.

1 Table 1: Allocation of Enabling Strategies by Rate Class Methodology Development & Research / Other Enabl ling Allocation using Total Program Costs P Rate Class 2023 2024 2025 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 54% 54% 55% Small General (10)...

AI summary The text presents tables showing the allocation of enabling strategies by rate class methodology for development, research, and education and outreach in 2023, 2024, and 2025. The allocation percentages vary by rate class, indicating a distribution of resources among different customer segments.

Table 2: Settlement Plan – Allocation of 2023 DSM Expenditures by Rate Class ($ millions) Prog ram costs by part icipating rate clas s Program Efficient Product Rebates RES Existing Residential New Residential Efficient Product Rebates BNI...

AI summary Table 2 outlines the allocation of 2023 Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditures by rate class, showing the distribution of costs for various programs and strategies across residential, general, industrial, and municipal sectors in millions of dollars.

1 Table 5: Alternate Scenario –Allocation of 2023-2025 DSM Expenditures by Rate Class ($ millions) Prog ram costs by part icipating rate clas s Program Efficient Product Rebates RES Existing Residential New Residential Efficient Product Re...

AI summary Table 5 presents an alternate scenario for the allocation of 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditures by rate class, detailing program costs, education and outreach, development and research, and other enabling strategies across various residential, industrial, and municipal categories.

5 Table 7: Alternate Scenario – Allocation of 2024 DSM Expenditures by Rate Class ($ millions) Prog ram costs by part icipating rate clas s Program Efficient Product Rebates RES Existing Residential New Residential Efficient Product Rebate...

AI summary Table 7 outlines the allocation of 2024 Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditures by rate class in millions of dollars. It details program costs across different categories such as efficient product rebates, direct installation, and enabling strategies, along with total costs for each rate class.

1 Table 8: Alternate Scenario – Allocation of 2025 DSM Expenditures by Rate Class ($ millions) Progr ram costs by part icipating rate clas s Program Efficient Product Rebates RES Existing Residential New Residential Efficient Product Rebat...

AI summary Table 8 outlines the allocation of 2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditures by rate class in millions of dollars. The data includes program costs, education and outreach, development and research, and other enabling strategies, with different rate classes showing varying levels of spending.

E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-10: ENERGY STORAGE : To what degree have energy load shifting technologies been investigated and analyzed as an...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) outlines its 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, which includes diurnal energy storage measures such as residential ETS systems and domestic hot water load control. E1 estimates spending of $240,000 to achieve $1.53 million in avoided costs from 0.8 MW of demand savings, with resource costs ranging from 2.0 to 2.7.

E1 Responses to Investment Property Owners Association of Nova Scotia (IPOANS) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL For domestic hot water-based direct load control, Guidehouse has provided an estimate of total savings within the 2023-202...

AI summary E1 provides estimates for energy efficiency programs, including direct load control and behind-the-meter battery control, along with their associated costs, benefits, and TRC ratios. These are compared to the overall energy efficiency portfolio, which includes a significant investment with corresponding ratepayer benefits and a TRC ratio of 2.9.

1 Request IR-05: 2 3 Reference: Appendix A, Table 8: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, page 39 4 of 149. 5 6 Reference: Appendix A, Table 9: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by 7 Program Component, page 40...

AI summary The text outlines Requests IR-05 and IR-06, which involve reproducing and modifying specific tables related to investment and savings in the Settlement Plan for different rate classes and scenarios, including adjustments to avoided energy costs and expenditure breakdowns.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (b) The “optimal IRP levels” referenced in the DSM Plan are taken to mean those annual 2 ene...

AI summary E1 outlines energy efficiency investment levels from the 2020 IRP Reference Plan for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, citing $61M (2023), $65M (2024), and $62M (2025). E1 emphasizes the IRP's role as a strategic tool balancing cost, reliability, and environmental standards, with priorities including affordability and clean energy.

tween E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 [Evidence] 2 Request IR-05: 3 4 Referencing p. 10 of 65, E1 stated that the DSM initiatives in...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) requests regarding the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, providing tables showing approved vs. actual first-year unit costs ($/kWh) from 2015 to 2025, along with variance explanations. Actual costs consistently differ from approved targets, with notable increases in recent years.

(0.025) (0.017) (0.032) 0.006 0.009 0.044 0.036 Year Over Year Actual (0.012) (0.007) 0.007 (0.008) 0.050 0.024 0.032 0.030 0.068 (0.048) 0.006 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-05 Page 1 of 7 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Applicatio...

AI summary The document presents tables comparing approved and actual energy efficiency investments and savings from 2015 to 2025, highlighting variances. It is part of E1's application for approval of a supply agreement for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, with data showing discrepancies between planned and actual outcomes.

siness Energy Rebates 21 etc.). 22 • Lingering impacts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic challenged E1 in meeting its 23 energy savings targets. 8 As per the First Amending Agreement between Nova Scotia Power and E1, and approved by the NSUA...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) faced challenges meeting energy savings targets due to lingering pandemic impacts. A deferred $2 million payment from Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) adjusted 2021-2022 investment amounts under the First Amending Agreement, approved by the NSUARB in 2020. The 2023-2025 DSM Plan application (M10473) is referenced.

Residual Suggested ID # Original finding Original Finding Description Status Remaining gaps Recommendations risk level timeframe 3.1 Access controls While EfficiencyOne has developed various Remediated + While EfficiencyOne has EfficiencyO...

AI summary EfficiencyOne has implemented logical access controls, but there are inconsistencies, especially with third-party IT providers, leading to a high risk. The original recommendations have been addressed, but further action is needed to align with the rate of access and permissions reviews.

rporate data warehouse with access to PI corporate data through an embedded Excel macro. warehouse Management response N/A Residual Suggested ID # Original finding Original Finding Description Status Remaining gaps Recommendations risk lev...

AI summary This chunk discusses a finding related to the redaction of social insurance numbers in EfficiencyOne's corporate data warehouse. The concern is that the current method does not fully render the numbers irrecoverable, although physical security safeguards are in place for paper forms.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Aside from climate similarities that each of Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts offer a...

AI summary This document provides comparative data on energy efficiency (EE) spending, population, and electricity revenue between Nova Scotia and three U.S. states (Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont), highlighting Nova Scotia's lower EE spending relative to its population and electricity revenue.

tween E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 v) Total electricity revenue (approximate derived values): 2 a. Maine – $1.66B 3 b. Massachuse...

AI summary The document provides information on electricity revenue and energy efficiency savings across several U.S. states and Nova Scotia, including data on renewable energy generation in Maine. It includes figures on total electricity revenue, incremental net savings, and net savings as a percentage of retail sales, as well as details on the sources of renewable energy in Maine.

the heating oil industry, one from ISO New England Inc. (“ISO-NE”), and one from energy efficiency businesses. G.L. c. 25, § 22(a). Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 21 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 P...

AI summary The text outlines the preparation of a three-year, statewide energy efficiency plan by the Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation (DOER) in coordination with the Council. The plan includes various programs such as efficiency and load management, demand response, energy storage, and support for energy use assessment and building energy codes.

at several Council and one-on-one meetings throughout October 2021 (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 47). On October 25, 2021, the Program Administrators, the Attorney General, and DOER reached a 40 page “Term Sheet” agreement that served...

AI summary In October 2021, the Program Administrators, Attorney General, and DOER reached a Term Sheet agreement guiding the finalization of the Statewide Plan. The Council supported the final Statewide Plan and the Program Administrators’ Three-Year Plans, which were filed with the Department on November 1, 2021. The Department is required to review these plans under the Green Communities Act.

Pursuant to the Green Communities Act, each Program Administrator’s Three-Year Plan must provide for the acquisition of all available energy efficiency resources that are cost 15 The Term Sheet includes a number of “key terms” agreed to by...

AI summary Under the Green Communities Act, Program Administrators must submit Three-Year Plans that prioritize cost-effective energy efficiency and demand reduction resources to mitigate capacity and energy costs for all customers. These plans must ensure the acquisition of available energy efficiency resources at the lowest reasonable customer contribution.

21(b)(1); see also Guidelines § 3.4.7. The Three-Year Plans must provide for the acquisition of these resources with the lowest reasonable customer contribution. G.L. c. 25, § 21(b)(1). A Program Administrator must demonstrate that its Thr...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plans, emphasizing low customer contribution, sustainability, and competitive procurement. It also references the Climate Act signed in 2021, which amended the Green Communities Act and Global Warming Solutions Act.

D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 13 Climate Act requires the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs (“EEA”) to set a goal, every three years, for the necessary contributions of the Statewide Plan to meeting each greenhouse g...

AI summary The Climate Act requires the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs to set GHG emissions reduction goals for the Statewide Plan every three years. The Green Communities Act, as amended, mandates cost-effectiveness reviews at the sector level, with a focus on benefit-cost ratios and the inclusion of the social value of GHG emissions reductions in the evaluation process.

Climate Act requires that the Department and the entities it regulates (e.g., the Program Administrators) prioritize safety, security, reliability of service, affordability, equity, and reductions in GHG emissions to meet statewide GHG emi...

AI summary The Climate Act mandates that the Department and regulated entities prioritize service reliability, affordability, equity, and GHG emission reductions. The Department emphasizes balancing cost-effective energy efficiency with prudent use of ratepayer funds and requires Program Administrators to consider both cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Energy efficiency costs must initially be funded from non-ratepayer sources.

trators must first fund the Three-Year Plans from other revenue sources.18 The Department may also approve funding from gas and electric ratepayers through a fully reconciling funding 17 To assess cost-efficiency and, thereby, the prudence...

AI summary The Department requires Program Administrators to fund Three-Year Plans through various revenue sources, including a system benefits charge, capacity market revenues, and cap-and-trade programs. The Department also mandates cost-effectiveness reporting to assess the prudence of expenditures.

m Administrators’ 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans, with modifications. G.L. c. 25, § 21(d)(2). Under the Three-Year Plans, the Program Administrators will invest approximately $4.0 billion in energy efficiency and demand reduction resources tha...

AI summary The 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans, aligned with the Energy Act of 2018 and the Climate Act, aim to invest $4.0 billion in energy efficiency and demand reduction, emphasizing strategic electrification and equitable access. These plans support the Commonwealth's 2030 GHG emissions reduction targets and net-zero by 2050.

Order. In our review of a Three-Year Plan, the Department examines the costs and bill impacts of the proposed programs from both a participant and non-participant perspective to ensure customers experience bill reductions from the energy e...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities assesses the cost and bill impacts of energy efficiency programs from both participant and non-participant perspectives to ensure affordability and equity, particularly for low-income residents, while balancing short-term bill impacts with long-term benefits. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring the cost of electricity remains affordable as electrification efforts expand.

t discovered multiple additional data anomalies, including but not limited to NSTAR Electric incorrectly projected its SBC revenues in its initial filing; the proposed EM&V budget in the Three-Year Plans and pre-filed testimony was not con...

AI summary The text highlights multiple data inconsistencies and inaccuracies in filings related to SBC revenues, EM&V budgets, and equity measures. It notes discrepancies in electrification thresholds and confusion around the equity component of the performance incentive mechanism, with Program Administrators failing to define equity measures as requested.

mandate, the Program Administrators coordinate with the Council to develop the programs contained in the Statewide Plan. G.L. c. 25, § 21(b)(1). The Department requires that the Program Administrators use a net lifetime all fuel savings me...

AI summary The Department requires Program Administrators to use a net lifetime all fuel savings metric, measured in MMBtus, and to report net savings by fuel and electric demand savings. The Program Administrators must also ensure that their Three-Year Plans address cost-effective energy efficiency and demand reduction resources.

energy efficiency and demand reduction resources. See G.L. c. 25, §§ 19(a), 19(b), 21(b)(1). B. Program Administrators Proposal 1. Plan Goals The Program Administrators set savings goals and GHG emissions reduction goals for the term, both...

AI summary The Program Administrators set energy efficiency and demand reduction goals for the 2022-2024 term, including both individual and aggregate savings and GHG emissions reduction targets. The goals are calculated using conversion factors to account for embedded energy in electricity generation.

37). In other words, the Program Administrators propose to count approximately 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reductions from the gas Program Administrators towards the electric Administrator, see, e.g., Exh. EGMA-4 (Rev.), Tab “Savi...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose counting 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reductions from gas-to-electric fuel switching toward the electric Program Administrator’s goal. They set these goals considering sustainability, stakeholder input, avoided costs, prior energy efficiency orders, bill impacts, and studies on energy efficiency potential and EM&V results.

year period beginning January 1, 2022, and that the Three-Year Plan is constructed to attain GHG emissions reduction targets set by the EEA Secretary (Program Administrators Brief at 14, 16-17). The Program Administrators argue that the Th...

AI summary The Program Administrators assert that the Three-Year Plan is designed to meet GHG emissions reduction targets set by the EEA Secretary, including a goal of reducing CO2e emissions by 845,000 metric tons by 2030. They highlight that the plan includes aggressive energy savings goals and a roadmap for achieving these reductions.

and, therefore, are not shown as separate line items (Program Administrator Reply Brief at 10). The Program Administrators assert that, going forward, they will continue to offer ground source heat pumps as a custom measure but are also in...

AI summary The Program Administrators state that ground source heat pumps will continue as a custom measure but are adding prescriptive C&I offerings. They argue for a 25-year measure life for prescriptive C&I heat pumps, differing from NEGPA's 30-year recommendation, and agree that custom measures will retain their custom measure lives. They also agree with NEGPA that baseline measures should not apply except in cases of upgrade or replacement.

ion of data collection does not strike an appropriate balance between the value and usefulness of the data requested with the cost to provide the data (Program Administrators Reply Brief at 13-14, citing Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 21). The...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that data collection requirements are too costly and that concerns about customer displacement should be addressed by other agencies. The Attorney General supports the approval of the Three-Year Plans and agrees to reallocate CO2e from gas to electric Program Administrators, contingent on ensuring no double-counting of savings from natural gas equipment.

serts that her support for this proposal is conditioned on an expressed commitment that no other savings from other efficient natural gas equipment are counted towards the achievement of the electric Program Administrators’ goal (Attorney...

AI summary The Attorney General supports the proposed electrification programs but requires that savings from other efficient natural gas equipment not be counted toward the Program Administrators’ goals. They emphasize equity, climate goals, and workforce development, and argue that electrification will lower customer costs and reduce fossil fuel heating. DOER supports the Statewide Plan, stating it complies with the Green Community Act and Climate Act requirements.

Statewide Plan complies with the Climate Act and the EEA Secretary’s overall GHG Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 84 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 71 emissions reduction goal (DOER Brief at 11)....

AI summary The DOER supports the Program Administrators' Statewide Plan, which aligns with the Climate Act and EEA Secretary’s GHG reduction goals. DOER emphasizes the importance of electrification, including incentives for switching to cold-air heat pumps, and supports mid-cycle changes to ADR offerings being addressed through the Council.

nters and landlords while minimizing risks of displacement and gentrification (CLF Brief at 30). CLF also requests that the Program Administrators (1) further develop their participation goals by building size and plans for serving C&I ren...

AI summary The Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) supports electrification efforts by Program Administrators, emphasizing benefits for environmental justice communities and low-income households. CLF requests improved outreach strategies, including customized communication and community-focused marketing, and argues that electrification reduces heating costs and aligns with the Climate Act.

Page 84 2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order, at 25-27; 2013-2015 Three-Year Plans Order, at 37-40. In addition, the Department considers whether the proposed programs prioritize safety, reliability, security, affordability, equity, and the GH...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation criteria for Three-Year Plans, including safety, reliability, affordability, equity, and GHG limits. It references legal frameworks such as the Energy Act of 2018 and the Green Communities Act, emphasizing the inclusion of strategic electrification in energy efficiency programs to achieve cost-effective GHG reductions.

.)). These goals were developed through a collaborative process that culminated with Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 98 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 85 the Council’s approval of the Statewide...

AI summary The Department has reviewed the Statewide Plan and found that the energy efficiency goals developed by the Program Administrator are appropriate, considering studies, sustainability, and territory-specific factors. The net lifetime all fuel savings metric is also deemed correctly calculated, taking into account various fuel types and embedded energy values.

ed modifications for heating systems and lighting addressed below, consistent with the achievement of all available cost-effective energy efficiency (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 144-151). In addition, each Three-Year Plan must be designed t...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures and their alignment with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction goals under the Energy Efficiency Act (EEA). It highlights the need for the electric Program Administrators to meet their emissions reduction targets, which they currently fall short of, and proposes transferring some reductions from the gas Program Administrators.

at 2-3; see, e.g., Exh. NSTAR Gas-2, at 37). To address this shortfall, the Program Administrators propose to transfer approximately 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reduction to be achieved by the gas Program Administrators to the ele...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose transferring 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reduction from gas to electric programs due to a shortfall in planned electric GHG emissions reduction. They argue this is appropriate as the reductions come from gas-to-electric fuel switching. DOER, Acadia, and NECEC support the proposal, but the Department notes that modifying the EEA Secretary's goals may lack legal authority.

electrification efforts, the Department notes that neither the parties, nor the Department have the legal authority to effectively modify the goals established by the EEA Secretary and it is not appropriate for customers of gas Program Adm...

AI summary The Department notes that the EEA Secretary's goals were set after the Program Administrators submitted their draft Statewide Plan, limiting their ability to align with the goals during the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan development. Future planning processes will allow more time for alignment, as per G.L. c. 21N, § 3B. The Department also states that electrification goals cannot be modified by the parties or the Department and that electric Program Administrators are responsible for meeting their GHG reduction goals.

lan term, the Department directs the Program Administrators to perform a review of the TRM for each prescriptive electrification offering before the next Three-Year Plan filing to ensure the accuracy of measure assumptions (Statewide Plan,...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities directs Program Administrators to review the Technology Readiness Matrix for prescriptive electrification offerings prior to the next Three-Year Plan filing. The Three-Year Plans include strategies to address participation barriers for hard-to-reach customers, with a focus on promoting equity and cost-effective energy efficiency. The Community First Partnership Program is highlighted as a strategy to increase energy efficiency reach, particularly in environmental justice communities.

did not receive weatherization services (Exh. DPU-Comm 5-9). In terms of incentives, the Program Administrators intend to require weatherization as a prerequisite for moderate income 72 The Program Administrators calculate GHG emissions re...

AI summary The Program Administrators are implementing weatherization as a prerequisite for moderate-income customers to receive enhanced incentives for heat pumps. However, weatherization will not be required for low-income customers to receive heat pump incentives. The Green Communities Act acknowledges that strategic electrification may increase electricity consumption but requires such efforts to result in net GHG emissions reductions.

-Comm 12-18). The Green Communities Act states that strategic electrification may increase electricity consumption, but stipulates that such efforts must be designed to result in cost-effective reductions in GHG emissions while minimizing...

AI summary The Green Communities Act emphasizes strategic electrification's potential to increase electricity consumption but requires cost-effective GHG emission reductions and minimized ratepayer bill impacts. Program Administrators must prioritize safety, reliability, affordability, and equity in delivering electrification efforts. Weatherization is highlighted as a foundational measure to reduce energy use and prepare buildings for electrification.

is increase in demand would have on electric grid resiliency and reliability (Tr. 3, at 462-463; Exh. DPU-Comm 12-14). Considering the potential energy savings lost from customers not 74 The Department notes that the risk of installing hea...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities is concerned about the potential negative impacts of installing heat pumps without prior weatherization, including increased demand on the electric grid, potential system upgrades, and increased costs for ratepayers. The Department suggests that weatherization should be encouraged prior to or as part of electrification projects to ensure energy consumption decreases and ratepayer bills are minimized.

). The Program Administrators may offer non-cost-effective strategic electrification measures that reduce customer energy use, lower GHG emissions, and lower customer energy costs within cost-effective strategic electrification offerings....

AI summary The Program Administrators are required to revise Energy Efficiency Data Tables to provide cost, benefits, and savings by sector for strategic electrification offerings, ensuring alignment with the Green Communities Act’s cost-effectiveness requirements. This is part of compliance filings and future reporting.

ven for non-participants, most Program Administrators79 expect significant bill impacts related to implementing their Three-Year Plans (Exhs. EGMA-6; LU-6 (Non-Participant Bill Impacts); NG-Gas-6, at 10-160; NSTAR-Gas-6; Compact-6; FGE-Ele...

AI summary The document discusses the potential bill impacts for non-participants due to the implementation of Three-Year Plans by Program Administrators. To mitigate these impacts, the Department will establish budget caps and require Program Administrators to seek approval for any budget increases that result in additional energy savings and benefits for customers.

ovide additional direct resource benefits to electric or gas customers above planned levels. After review and subject to the directives set forth above, the Department finds that the Program Administrators have demonstrated their proposed...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities reviews proposed strategic electrification strategies and active demand reduction (ADR) offerings by Program Administrators, emphasizing cost-effective GHG emissions reductions and minimizing costs to ratepayers. The ADR proposals include performance-based incentives for technologies like thermostats and battery storage.

cess and whether it is “opt-in” or “opt-out.” The Department is concerned about the safety of children, the elderly, and medically compromised individuals residing in a household that is auto-enrolled in an air conditioning ADR program. Ac...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities is concerned about the safety of vulnerable individuals in households auto-enrolled in air conditioning ADR programs and requires opt-in enrollment for residential and income-eligible ADR programs. The Online Marketplace allows customers to purchase energy efficiency products with rebates already applied. Program Administrators are seeking approval for a statewide EV load management offering, though details are not yet provided.

Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. K at 3 (October 31, 2018); NSTAR Electric Company, D.P.U. 18-119, Exh. DPU-NSTAR-Electric 5-1, at 2 (December 5, 2018). 83 The Department recognizes the potential for overlap between EV programs and the energy...

AI summary The Department acknowledges potential overlaps between EV programs and energy efficiency plans, directing electric distribution companies to coordinate and streamline their offerings. It cautions Program Administrators to avoid double recovery of EV-related costs through multiple funding mechanisms.

customers knowing some customers have not been served, and prior to assessing the remaining savings opportunities for renters, moderate income, minority, and limited English-proficiency customers (Exh. DPU-Comm 9-2). The Department finds t...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities finds that eliminating lighting programs for certain customer groups may hinder equitable service and emissions reduction goals. Energy efficiency remains a cost-effective way to lower emissions, and continuing electric savings measures can help mitigate increased consumption and grid costs during electrification.

are fulfilling their statutory obligation to pursue all cost-effective energy efficiency resources (Exh. DPU-Comm 10-12). Cost-effective savings for limited fossil fuel heating are still available (Exh. DPU-Comm 10-12). A participant upgra...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures, including upgrading condensing heating systems and the cost-effectiveness of such upgrades. It mentions savings in energy consumption and GHG emissions, and the Department supports prioritizing heat pumps and low-carbon technologies through market transformation.

a); Tr. 1, at 89). Conversely, MEMA argues that heat pumps will not fully replace fossil-fueled heating systems in the next three years and, therefore, preserving existing rebates for 91 The Department notes that incentive levels do not ha...

AI summary The Department and MEMA discuss the effectiveness of energy efficiency programs, particularly regarding the use of heat pumps and high-efficiency oil boilers. MEMA argues that heat pumps may not fully replace fossil-fueled heating systems in the near future, while the Department emphasizes cost-effectiveness and the need to justify ratepayer funding based on achieved benefits.

framework for long-term GHG emissions reductions from heating fuels. Executive Order No. 596, § 1 (September 9, 2021).95 The Department expects that the Commission on Clean Heat and the resulting policy framework will provide additional gu...

AI summary The text outlines a framework for long-term GHG emissions reductions from heating fuels, referencing Executive Order No. 596 and the role of the Commission on Clean Heat. It also discusses the submission of a revised Statewide Plan by Program Administrators, which includes provisions for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) energy efficiency measures.

cy measure during the upcoming Three-Year Plans term (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. M § IV.C.2).98 Consistent with the Term Sheet, the Program Administrators did not include any renewable natural gas CHP proposals in the 2022-2024 Three-Yea...

AI summary The Program Administrators excluded renewable natural gas CHP proposals from the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans, aligning with the Term Sheet's phase-out of natural gas CHP incentives. However, they later added the provision to the October 6th draft Statewide Plan, allowing support for cost-effective projects that meet emissions and savings criteria under the EEA methodology.

D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 135 Statewide Plan.99 Less than three weeks after submitting the October 6th draft Statewide Plan to the Council, the Program Administrators, DOER, and Attorney General reached agreement on the Term...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPU) is concerned that the Program Administrators are not fulfilling their statutory obligation to include all cost-effective energy efficiency resources in the Three-Year Plan, specifically noting the exclusion of renewable natural gas CHP measures. The Green Communities Act identifies CHP as an energy efficiency measure and has been included in prior plans.

ents from the Three-Year Plans based solely on an agreement with another party. To the extent the Program Administrators develop parameters for implementing projects, these parameters 100 The Department supports the efforts of the Program...

AI summary The Department emphasizes that the Term Sheet is not part of the Statewide Plan or the Program Administrators’ Three-Year Plans. Program Administrators must include any elements from the Term Sheet in their Three-Year Plans with full documentation and record evidence to be considered by the Department. The text also references evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) of energy efficiency programs.

tion Management Committee will provide oversight of the EM&V activities (Statewide Plan, Exh 1, at 177-178). The Program Administrators have demonstrated that their proposed EM&V framework is appropriate in terms of funding, scope, oversig...

AI summary The document discusses the oversight of EM&V activities by the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority, approval of an EM&V framework, and the requirement for potential studies aligned with the Climate Act and EEA Secretary’s Goal Letter. The Department finds the proposed framework consistent with guidelines and approves its implementation.

roduction In reviewing the Three-Year Plans, the Department is charged with ensuring that the Program Administrators have (1) minimized administrative costs to the fullest extent practicable and (2) used competitive procurement processes t...

AI summary The Department is tasked with ensuring Program Administrators minimize administrative costs and use competitive procurement. They must report PP&A expenditures by category and allocate at least 10% and 20% of funds to low-income sectors for electric and gas efficiency programs, respectively. Program Administrators propose spending 3.4% and 3.7% on PP&A for electric and gas programs over three years.

Table IV.C.1 (Rev.)). Each Program Administrator’s PP&A costs as a percentage of total program expenditures for 2022 through 2024 are presented in the Gas and Electric Budget Comparison Tables (see, e.g., Exh. FGE-4, Table IV.C.2.2 (Rev.))...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of PP&A costs for Program Administrators from 2022 through 2024, as well as the competitive procurement of services for energy efficiency programs. It also outlines the percentage of budgets allocated to low-income programs in both electric and gas sectors over a three-year period.

App. C.1 – Electric, Table V.B (Rev.)). The gas Program Administrators project that they will spend, on average, 20.6 percent of the total energy efficiency program budget on low-income residential demand-side management and education prog...

AI summary The Program Administrators assert that they have minimized administrative costs through collaborative processes and economies of scale, citing a Department-mandated study on best practices. They also project that a significant portion of the energy efficiency program budget will be allocated to low-income residential demand-side management and education programs over the Three-Year Plan term.

laboratively with LEAN to capture all available cost-effective energy efficiency in the low-income sector (Program Administrators Brief at 58, citing Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 108-115). No other party addressed low-income program budgets...

AI summary The document discusses the minimization of administrative costs in energy efficiency programs, noting that some Program Administrators have kept their PP&A costs flat or slightly increased, while others have seen a significant increase, such as electric Program Administrators who proposed an $8.4 million increase over the Three-Year Plan period.

nd develop new program designs during the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans term.103 However, the Program Administrators propose significant enhancements in every Three-Year Plan. D.P.U. 18-110 through D.P.U. 18-119, Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 13...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose significant enhancements to energy efficiency programs during the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans term, including new initiatives, realignments, and outreach strategies. However, there is a discrepancy in the reported PP&A budget, and the Department emphasizes the need for accurate and complete filings to ensure an efficient review within the statutory 90-day period.

recommendations were adopted. 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, at 50. The Program Administrators have implemented many of the recommendations in the PP&A Study Report, which has led to 104 The Best Practices for Minimizing Program Plannin...

AI summary The document references the implementation of recommendations from the PP&A Study Report, which led to the minimization of administrative costs through updated accounting systems, streamlined data reporting, and the establishment of a cost review working group. These efforts are intended to continue under the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan.

ta request process. PP&A Study Report at 18. As directed by the Department, in the 2019 Annual Reports, the Program Administrators provided a detailed explanation of the progress towards implementing each recommendation contained in the PP...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of recommendations from the PP&A Study Report by Program Administrators, focusing on creating a formal process for Key Performance Indicators and addressing data requests from stakeholders while minimizing administrative costs. The Department of Public Utilities has directed the Program Administrators to adopt revised guidelines and work with the Council to develop a formal process for handling data requests.

Program Administrators Brief at 59, citing Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. C (Rev.), Table V.D.1). The Department will not make any substantive findings on the reasonableness of the Program Administrators’ decision not to competitively procur...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities finds that Program Administrators' 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans meet statutory requirements for competitive procurement and low-income program budgets, but will not make substantive findings on the reasonableness of the Program Administrators’ decision not to competitively procure services at this time.

ton (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. Q, Study 1, at 197). The Program Administrators state that, in light of the passage of the Climate Act, they entered into a new contract with the study author to update the recommended social value of GHG...

AI summary The Program Administrators updated the social value of GHG emissions reductions from $128 to $393 per short ton by adjusting the discount rate from 2% to 1%, following a supplemental study and in response to the Climate Act. This update is used in calculating benefits for energy efficiency programs.

D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 159 Program Administrators state that the Statewide Plan and the Program Administrator-specific Three-Year Plans include cost-effective sectors and programs for each plan year and over the entirety...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that the increased social value of GHG emissions reductions from $128 to $393 per short ton reflects Massachusetts legislators' climate urgency and the Commonwealth's commitment to reducing emissions, as outlined in the Climate Act and the Supplemental Study.

ties for cost-effective projects (including custom projects) (Program Administrators Brief at 46-47, citing Exh. DPU-Comm 8-1; RR-DPU-3). The Program Administrators assert these types of projects are critical to achievement of overarching...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that cost-effective projects, including custom ones, are essential to achieving the Three-Year Plan goals and equity commitments, particularly for small businesses. They claim compliance with cost-effectiveness screening requirements using the TRC test. The Attorney General supports the proposal, citing the Supplemental Study and the AESC Study's initial $128 per short ton value.

l $128 per short ton value, recognizing that this figure could be updated as more research was available and as study users monitored developments in this rapidly changing area (Attorney General Brief at 15-16). The Attorney General assert...

AI summary The Attorney General argues that using a $128 per short ton value for GHG emissions reductions is critical to maintaining the cost-effectiveness of the Three-Year Plans, and that disallowing it would reduce benefits by 29% and potentially lead to the loss of certain measures. DOER asserts that the Program Administrators properly incorporated updated avoided costs into their BCR models.

GHG emissions by appropriately valuing climate-mitigation investments (DOER Brief at 18). DOER also maintains that a low discount rate ensures that future environmental damage costs and benefits are appropriately valued (DOER Brief at 18)....

AI summary DOER argues that a low discount rate is necessary to appropriately value climate-mitigation investments and future environmental damage costs. It also claims that revising the social value of GHG emissions reductions to $128 per short ton may conflict with the EEA Secretary’s priorities and that the $393 per short ton value is specific to Massachusetts. Acadia Center supports the Program Administrators’ proposed social value of GHG emissions reductions.

te would be closer to two percent (Exh. DPU-Comm 1-5(c), Att. B at 22). Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 184 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 171 Next, the Department takes issue with the Program A...

AI summary The Department challenges the Program Administrators' proposed increase in the social value of GHG emissions reductions, arguing that the change would not affect program design or implementation, as the programs remain cost-effective regardless of the value used.

s in the Supplemental Study were the result of a careful, stakeholder-driven analysis. In fact, the Program Administrators admitted that no quantitative analysis was performed during the course of the Supplemental Study (Tr. 2, at 290-292;...

AI summary The Supplemental Study's findings are questioned due to a lack of quantitative analysis, and the AESC Study is expected to provide reliable avoided cost figures for the Three-Year Plan. The AESC Study is conducted before the draft Statewide Plan is submitted to ensure Program Administrators have time to finalize proposals.

e to finalize their proposals using the avoided cost assumptions from the study. G.L. c. 25, §§ 21(b)(1), (c). Despite the fact that the Supplemental Study was finalized only 13 business days before the Three-Year Plan filing deadline and...

AI summary The Department is skeptical of the Program Administrators' claim that changes are needed to meet the Green Communities Act's cost-effectiveness requirement, as the Program Administrators failed to identify any changes made to the Three-Year Plans due to the higher social value of GHG emissions reductions.

of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 175 Program Administrators provide recalculated BCR screening models using the AESC Study-derived $128 per short ton social value of GHG emissions reductions (Tr. 2, at 288-290). The data the...

AI summary The Department of Energy Resources (DOER) evaluates the Program Administrators' recalculated BCR models and social value of GHG emissions reductions. It finds that the revised social value, derived from a non-peer-reviewed literature review, does not justify increasing the Three-Year Plans' benefits from $9.2 billion to $12.9 billion without additional quantitative support.

of any quantitative analysis, will not address climate change any more urgently than the original social value of GHG emissions reductions, and was not developed through the formal AESC Study group process. For these reasons, the Departmen...

AI summary The Department denies the Program Administrators' proposal to change the social value of GHG emissions reductions from $128 to $393 per short ton. It emphasizes that the $128 value, derived from the AESC Study, should be used in future three-year plan filings, and does not include updates to the BCR screening model after a specific deadline.

yses submitted using the $128 per short ton social value of GHG emissions reductions, however, did not include the December 21, 2021, updates to the Program Administrators’ BCR screening model and energy efficiency data tables (Statewide P...

AI summary The document discusses the social value of GHG emissions reductions, setting it at $128 per short ton based on the AESC Study. Program Administrators are required to update their BCR screening models and data tables to reflect this value. The Green Communities Act mandates performance incentives for Program Administrators based on their success in meeting plan goals.

ide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 27). The Program Administrators do not propose to set individual incentive caps for either the equity component or the electrification component; instead, the proposed incentive payouts for each component are su...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose a performance incentive mechanism with a total portfolio cap and specific caps for the standard component until equity and electrification thresholds are met. They also propose not applying marginal abatement cost benefits to fossil fuel measures to prioritize electrification, aligning with the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan and the Climate Act.

D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 181 the performance incentive mechanism (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, Apps. A at 27; S.1 - Electric (Rev.); S.2 - Gas (Rev.)). The Program Administrators state that the proposed payout rate for the equit...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose performance incentive payout rates for the equity component of the electric and gas programs, set at $0.0173 and $0.0136, respectively. These rates are higher than the standard component rates by 20% and 55%. A threshold of 85% of planned portfolio equity benefits is proposed to trigger incentives, aiming to increase equity benefits beyond previous terms.

hreshold, they will begin to earn a performance incentive (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 28). The Program Administrators propose not to cap performance incentives from the equity and electrification components as long as the total perf...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose not capping performance incentives from the equity and electrification components, provided the total performance incentive does not exceed 125% of the portfolio design level. The equity component aims to incentivize benefits in 38 Targeted Communities and for moderate-income customers, based on income, minority or English isolation, and historically low participation in energy efficiency programs.

27; S.1 - Electric (Rev.); S.2 - Gas (Rev.)). The Program Administrators state that the purpose of the standard component is to provide an incentive for the Program Administrators to 60 percent in Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 29. Duri...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose a standard component of the incentive program with a 60% threshold for Targeted Communities and moderate-income customers, aiming to avoid double-counting benefits. The payout rates for the standard component are set at $0.0144 for electric and $0.0087 for gas. The threshold for achieving incentives is either 75% of planned benefits or the statewide weighted portfolio threshold.

tandard component is either 75 percent of planned standard component benefits or the statewide weighted portfolio threshold (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 27, 29; Tr. 3, at 403). The Program Administrators propose to establish the weig...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose to establish a weighted portfolio threshold for benefits and discontinue the value component to avoid conflicting incentives and promote electrification and equitable access. They also submitted a revised exemplar performance incentive mechanism upon request.

Program Administrators submitted a revised exemplar performance incentive mechanism that included a value component (Exh. DPU-Comm 3-16, Att.). C. Positions of the Parties 1. Program Administrators The Program Administrators assert that it...

AI summary Program Administrators submitted a revised performance incentive mechanism, arguing that discontinuing the value component would better align with energy and climate goals by encouraging equity and electrification measures, despite increased uncertainty in cost estimation due to expanded program scope.

ving benefits at the lowest-cost but also to consider the new electrification and equity goals (DOER Brief at 33-34). Specifically, DOER contends that the benefits associated with equity and electrification are expected to come at a higher...

AI summary DOER argues that the benefits of electrification and equity goals come at higher costs compared to standard components and that existing mechanisms already encourage cost containment. DOER suggests distinct value components for each of the three component pools to ensure cost-effective achievement of priorities and avoid incentivizing energy efficiency in affluent areas over underserved ones.

to its standard for setting a fair and reasonable return on equity, we may exercise discretion in considering various factors to determine the appropriate level of performance incentives, including qualitative factors such as compliance wi...

AI summary The document discusses the determination of a fair and reasonable return on equity, considering compliance with the Green Communities Act and other factors. It also references past decisions and the approval of incentive pools for electric and gas Program Administrators in the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans, noting changes in the proposed incentive pool for the current Three-Year Plans.

(Rev.) at 14; C.2 – Gas (Rev.) at 9). Although the proposed performance incentive Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 207 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 194 The Department finds that the proposed st...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities has determined that the proposed statewide incentive pool is consistent with previous plans but has reduced it by 10% for each gas and electric Program Administrator due to deficiencies in their filings, which impacted reviewability and reliability.

, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 211 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 198 statewide (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 29). The Attorney General, DOER, and Acadia support the adoption of the electrification component...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPUE) has raised concerns about the electrification component of the Statewide Plan, arguing that it lacks sufficient definition and verifiability. The Attorney General, DOER, and Acadia support the electrification component, but the Program Administrators have identified some measures as ineligible. The DPUE requires Program Administrators to revise their Energy Efficiency Data Tables to address these concerns.

nent. Accordingly, each Program Administrator shall provide the following information in its required compliance filing: (1) revised Energy Efficiency Data Tables identifying specific 126 As discussed above, the Department has modified the...

AI summary The Department has modified the criteria for the equity component of the program, making electrification measures in certain communities ineligible for the electrification component. Program Administrators must provide detailed compliance filings, including Energy Efficiency Data Tables and methods for tracking strategic electrification measures at the ZIP code level. The Department accepts the modified electrification component as consistent with energy policies and necessary to overcome barriers in the fuel conversion market.

osed electrification component, as modified above, is appropriately designed to overcome barriers in the nascent market for fuel conversions (see Tr. 3, at 363-364). 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, at 96. However, as proposed, the Depart...

AI summary The Department identifies a design flaw in the electrification component of the Program, noting insufficient safeguards that may create perverse incentives for Program Administrators to prioritize electrification over weatherization and right-sizing of heating and cooling equipment. To address this, the Department proposes making performance incentives contingent on prior weatherization.

arguing that it is redundant to other components of the proposed performance incentive mechanism (Attorney General Brief at 23, citing Tr. 3, at 290-291; DOER Brief at 33). DOER suggests that if the Department directs the Program Administr...

AI summary The Department of Energy Resources (DOER) argues that the value component of the performance incentive mechanism is essential for ensuring equity, electrification, and standard energy efficiency. It emphasizes that previous energy efficiency plans have included this component as a central element to maximize net benefits and ensure cost-effectiveness of programs.

at 97-98. The Department is not persuaded by the Program Administrators’ argument that a value component may disincentivize their pursuit of equity and electrification measures. Rather, the Department has found that a portion of the incent...

AI summary The Department rejects the Program Administrators’ argument that a value component may disincentivize equity and electrification measures, finding that tying a portion of the incentive pool to net benefits ensures cost-effective administration of energy efficiency programs. The Department also dismisses DOER’s suggestion of distinct value components, favoring a unified approach.

Page 206 Department finds it necessary to ensure that the Program Administrators possess a clear incentive to minimize administrative costs when implementing the Three-Year Plans. Accordingly, the Program Administrators shall include a val...

AI summary The Department mandates that Program Administrators include a value component in performance incentive mechanisms to minimize administrative costs and ensure adequate incentives for net benefits. At least 30% of the incentive pool must be allocated to the value component, with a threshold of 75% of planned portfolio net-benefits.

Page 209 cost-effective energy efficiency, while also reflecting the need for the Program Administrators to improve the quality of their filings with the Department and compliance with Department directives. Further, the modifications to t...

AI summary The text discusses modifications to energy efficiency programs aimed at improving compliance and enhancing incentives for strategic electrification, aligning with the Massachusetts 2050 Decarbonization Roadmap. It also outlines funding sources for these programs, including ratepayer revenues, cap and trade proceeds, and other approved mechanisms.

unds; (2) whether past programs have lowered the cost of electricity to consumers; and Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 223 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 210 (3) the effect of any rate increases...

AI summary The text discusses the legal requirements for gas Program Administrators to include a fully reconciling funding mechanism, such as the Energy Efficiency Surcharge (EES), in their Three-Year Plans. It also outlines how electric Program Administrators project revenues from non-EES sources, including the System Benefits Charge (SBC) and Federal Clean Energy Program (FCM) revenues.

he year (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, Apps. A at 38-39; C.1 – Electric (Rev.), Tables IV.B.3.1, IV.B.3.2). The electric Program Administrators propose to allocate SBC and FCM revenues to each customer sector in proportion to each class’ kWh con...

AI summary The document discusses the allocation of SBC and FCM revenues to customer sectors based on kWh consumption and the 2019 Supplemental Budget's impact on RGGI revenues. It also outlines the use of the energy efficiency reconciliation factor (EERF) to collect budget differences from non-EES funding sources.

atewide Plan (Program Administrators Brief at 63). Accordingly, to mitigate the growing energy efficiency program cost burden on ratepayers, the Program Administrators maintain that they are: (1) actively working to identify additional out...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that the significant bill impacts from their Three-Year Plans are necessary to meet GHG emissions reductions under the Climate Act and are equitable, balancing long-term benefits with short-term costs. They also seek outside funding and government assistance to mitigate the financial burden on ratepayers.

bution (Program Administrators Brief at 60). Accordingly, the Program Administrators assert that the Department should find the bill impacts are reasonable and consistent with Department precedent (Program Administrators Brief at 61). 2. A...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that energy efficiency bill impacts are reasonable and consistent with Department precedent. The Attorney General emphasizes the need to balance energy efficiency costs with emission reduction goals and avoided supply costs. DOER supports the Program Administrators, noting that funding sources like the SBC and FCM help minimize customer bill impacts and that programs provide significant benefits.

343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 215 reduce customers’ energy usage and bills, and are required to meet the Commonwealth’s GHG emissions limits for 2030 (DOER Brief at 23). 4. Acadia Center Acadia asserts that, given the benefi...

AI summary The document discusses the anticipated revenue sources for electric Program Administrators during the Three-Year Plans term, including the System Benefits Charge (SBC) and participation in the Federal Clean Energy Program (FCM). It notes that RGGI funding is no longer available due to legislative prioritization of non-energy efficiency activities.

their projected budgets through the EES contained in their EERF tariffs is consistent with the Guidelines.131 Similarly, the Department finds that the gas Program Administrators’ proposal 130 NSTAR Electric incorrectly projected its SBC re...

AI summary The text discusses the alignment of projected budgets through the Energy Efficiency Surcharge (EES) within the Electric Efficiency Reconciliation Factor (EERF) and Local Distribution Adjustment Clause (LDAC) tariffs with established guidelines. It also references a prior error by NSTAR Electric in projecting SBC revenues and the requirement for electric distribution companies to revise their EERF tariffs in future rate cases.

NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 232 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 219 5. Bill Impacts The Department must consider customer bill impacts when approving the use of ratepayer funds for energy efficiency programs. D.P.U. 08...

AI summary The Department must evaluate customer bill impacts when approving energy efficiency programs, balancing short-term costs with long-term benefits. This includes considering affordability and equity under General Laws, and assessing the reasonableness of increased budgets due to new programs and statutory requirements.

gic electrification programs (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 8). In addition, Program Administrator budgets have increased due to new statutory requirements.133 The Program Administrators’ 132 Going forward, in its three-year plan filing, each...

AI summary The text discusses increases in Program Administrators’ budgets due to new statutory requirements, such as the Climate Act, and highlights the impact of electrification on electricity bills. It notes that traditional energy efficiency programs reduce energy usage and bills, but electrification may lead to higher costs for some customers.

and/or add air conditioning will increase. In addition, these customers may experience increased costs to heat their homes with electricity relative to a fossil fuel heat source because the cost of electricity as a heating fuel is currentl...

AI summary The text discusses potential increases in customer costs due to electrification projects, such as oil heat to heat pump conversions, and highlights the impact of strategic electrification programs on overall electric savings. It also notes the challenge of increased energy efficiency budgets without prior funding sources to offset program costs to ratepayers.

29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 235 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 222 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, at 105-106. For the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans term, the Legislature has reallocated RGGI revenues such tha...

AI summary The document discusses the reallocation of RGGI revenues and the impact on energy efficiency programs, noting that funding to offset costs to ratepayers has decreased despite increased energy efficiency budgets needed to meet GHG reduction goals. Energy efficiency costs now make up a significant portion of residential gas and electric distribution rates.

tribution rates (excluding the fixed customer charge) and 14 percent of residential electric distribution rates (excluding the fixed customer charge) (see, e.g., Exh. NG-Gas-6, at 12). $60 million of the $2.1 billion total electric budget)...

AI summary The text discusses the distribution rates and budget allocations, referencing specific exhibits and regulatory filings. It highlights the need to consider energy bill impacts on customers, especially during the pandemic and rising energy costs, while acknowledging the long-term benefits of efficiency programs, including GHG reductions.

rovide total benefits of approximately $9.0 billion over the lifetime of the efficiency measures installed (Exh. DPU-Comm 8-1). Significantly, many of these benefits are derived from GHG emissions reductions. In particular, the energy effi...

AI summary The document highlights the significant benefits of energy efficiency programs, including $9 billion in total benefits over the lifetime of installed measures and annual CO2e emissions reductions of over 845,000 metric tons by 2030. The Department acknowledges the bill impacts but finds them reasonable, while implementing measures to mitigate these impacts on ratepayers.

ool by ten percent. Further, the Department has directed all Program Administrators to minimize administrative costs and will not allow recovery of certain costs until the Department has reviewed and approved the adequacy of a Council data...

AI summary The Department has directed Program Administrators to minimize administrative costs, ensure low-income customers receive weatherization before electrification, and restrict budget increases without approval. These measures aim to ensure reasonable bill impacts and increased energy savings.

ram Administrator must demonstrate that an increase in budget results in an increase in kWh or therm savings.139 Together, the Department finds that these steps are an important means to ensure that the Program Administrators deliver the f...

AI summary The text discusses the need for Program Administrators to demonstrate that increased budgets lead to increased energy savings, ensuring cost-efficiency and delivering benefits of the Three-Year Plans to ratepayers at the lowest possible cost. It also highlights the significance and materiality of the bill impacts associated with these plans.

owing why the proposed program budget modification should be approved. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 239 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 226 the Commonwealth’s critical energy policy goals. Ini...

AI summary The text discusses the need to balance energy policy goals with the impact on customer bills, noting that initiatives like net metering and grid modernization are funded through reconciling mechanisms that recover costs from ratepayers, contributing to approximately 25% of residential electric distribution rates.

h from these policy initiatives, the Department and policy makers must remain cognizant of the cumulative effect that these programs will have on customer bills now and in the future. 140 See, e.g., 220 CMR 18.00; Model SMART Provision, D....

AI summary The text discusses the need for regulators and policymakers to consider the cumulative impact of energy efficiency programs on customer bills. It references various Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.) proceedings and mentions the use of revenue decoupling to recover program implementation costs through the Energy Efficiency Surcharge (EES).

der, at 169-170. The Program Administrators did not, however, include an energy scorecard proposal or associated budget as part of their RCS filings in the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans. 149 On April 17, 2017, DOER promulgated revised RCS reg...

AI summary The Program Administrators did not include an energy scorecard proposal or associated budget in their 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans. DOER revised RCS regulations and guidelines in 2017 and 2020, requiring energy scorecards to be offered with in-home energy audits. The Department did not make findings on energy scorecards or budgets, but directed Program Administrators to file amended budgets if implementation required a 20% increase.

tart using home energy scorecards in the first quarter of 2022 (Exh. DOER-Comm 1-4, at 3). C. Positions of the Parties 1. Program Administrators The Program Administrators argue that their proposed RCS program budgets are fully consistent...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that their proposed RCS program budgets align with the Green Communities Act and Department directives, and that compliance issues are related to implementation rather than budget approval. They also note they missed the original target launch date.

th DOER, the proposed RCS budgets should be approved (Program Administrators Reply Brief at 7). The Program Administrators acknowledge that they missed the original target launch date for home energy scorecards but maintain that the delay...

AI summary The Program Administrators argue that their proposed Residential Conservation Standards (RCS) budgets should be approved, despite missing the original launch date for home energy scorecards. They assert that the delay was justified and that they are now ready to launch. They also emphasize that customer consent is required for sharing home energy assessment data with the United States Department of Energy, citing confidentiality provisions. The Attorney General supports the approval of the RCS budgets, even though the scorecards have not yet been implemented.

ressly charged with reviewing the reasonableness of the budget and expenditures, and may modify the budget. St. 1980, c. 465 § 7(b). The Program Administrators must include a description of the activities that support the requested budget....

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources (DOER) is reviewing the reasonableness of the Residential Conservation Standards (RCS) budgets proposed by Program Administrators. It approves most of the budgets but notes that the portion allocated to home energy scorecards lacks supporting proposals and documentation, raising concerns about the justification for these expenditures.

some information regarding activities they had taken during the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans term regarding home energy scorecards, including a contractual agreement with DOE to produce a home energy score (RR-DOER-1; Exh. DOER-Comm 1-4). In...

AI summary The document discusses the need for Program Administrators to file a comprehensive proposal and itemized budget for home energy scorecards in order for the Department to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budgets. The Department has not received a complete proposal and thus cannot make findings regarding the budgets.

il 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 256 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 243 (2) an itemized RCS budget with information specific to home energy scorecards necessary to carry out the proposal. See, e.g., NSTAR Gas C...

AI summary The document discusses the requirement for Program Administrators to remove energy scorecard costs from RCS budgets and the need for customer consent to disclose audit data to third parties, referencing Massachusetts General Laws and a prior petition.

n its CVEO proposal in D.P.U. 20-40 and its CVEO proposal in the instant proceeding:158 (1) an increase in assumed battery costs from $10,000 per battery to $12,000 per battery, based on more recent experience; (2) a reduction in battery o...

AI summary The document discusses updates to the Compact's CVEO proposal, including higher battery costs, revised battery output estimates, delayed SMART revenue projections, and changes in incentive structures and participant enrollment timing. The Department rejected the earlier CVEO proposal due to funding issues and legal inconsistencies.

h Program Administrators’ planning assumptions; and (5) a shift of participant enrollments from the end of the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plan term (i.e., “backloaded”) to the beginning of the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan term (i.e., “front-loaded”...

AI summary The Cape Light Compact proposes enhanced incentives for commercial and industrial energy efficiency programs to increase participation among underrepresented customer classes. These incentives include up to 100% for weatherization, lighting, and electrification measures, supported by studies showing lower historical participation rates among these groups.

, at 638-639). In sum, the Compact asserts that: (1) the proposed CVEO budget is reasonable and designed to maximize use of federal and state outside funding to minimize costs to participants and costs collected from ratepayers through the...

AI summary The Compact argues that the CVEO budget is reasonable and designed to minimize costs to participants and ratepayers. The Attorney General supports the proposed CVEO enhancements, stating they align with the Green Communities Act and address environmental and economic concerns.

27). The Attorney General contends that the Department’s Order in D.P.U. 20-40 denying the CVEO as a matter of law construes the energy efficiency funding statute too narrowly (Attorney General Brief at 28). The Attorney General further as...

AI summary The Attorney General challenges the Department’s Order in D.P.U. 20-40 for narrowly interpreting the energy efficiency funding statute and not fully reflecting the Energy Act of 2018's changes to the Green Communities Act. The Attorney General asserts that the proposed CVEO requires pairing solar PV with battery storage and heat pumps to be effective. DOER does not take a position on the CVEO component but supports other enhancements to the Statewide Plan. Acadia Center advocates for approval of the Compact’s Three-Year Plan.

ratepayer protections in the Green Communities Act regarding cost effectiveness, funding, and bill impacts. G.L. c. 25, § 21(a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(iv). Customers within the Compact’s member municipalities may opt out of participation in the C...

AI summary The text discusses the Green Communities Act and its provisions related to cost effectiveness, funding, and bill impacts. It highlights that customers in the Compact's municipalities may opt out of the municipal aggregation program but not of having the Compact as their energy efficiency Program Administrator. The Department is required to ensure the Compact spends its funds reasonably and prudently.

egislature’s clear intent to have DOER design a ratepayer solar incentive program (i.e., SMART) that “promotes the orderly transition to a stable and self-sustaining solar PV market at a reasonable cost to ratepayers.” St. 2016, c. 75, §§...

AI summary The legislature intended for DOER to design a solar incentive program (SMART) that promotes a stable solar PV market at a reasonable cost. The proposed CVEO is seen as conflicting with this, as it also offers incentives to low-income participants. The text argues that interpreting energy efficiency laws to allow alternative solar programs could misalign with the Climate Act's GHG reduction goals.

h. Compact-2, at 130). In this Three-Year Plan filing, the Department directed the Compact to set forth the incremental budget of its enhancements relative to the Statewide Plan. 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, at 132-133. The Compact te...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources (DOER) is reviewing the Compact's Three-Year Plan, focusing on the incremental budget for its residential multifamily new construction and C&I existing buildings enhancements. Concerns are raised about the budget impacts and the lack of evidence demonstrating the reasonableness and prudence of these enhancements.

rd with its residential new construction and C&I existing buildings enhancements, but makes no substantive findings on the prudence of these incentive levels at this time. The Department again directs the Compact to complete prior to the f...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources requires the Compact to analyze enhanced incentives in its 2025-2027 Three-Year Plan, ensuring they are justified and necessary for participation levels. The Compact must provide detailed support for these incentives, including stakeholder review and budget breakdowns, in future filings.

oping these materials as part of their required compliance filings in these dockets. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 292 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 279 D. Allocation of Shared Costs 1. Intro...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of shared costs between the Compact's energy efficiency and municipal aggregation programs, highlighting the need for internal controls to ensure proper cost recovery through the EES and operational adder.

al Reports and Term Reports a comparison of planned allocations versus actual spent dollars and an explanation of any significant variance (i.e., a variance of greater than ten percent). 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, at 142. The Depart...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of consumer advocacy costs related to energy efficiency programs, referencing the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order and the Department's expectations for budgeting. It also mentions the Cape Light Compact's proposed 2020 EES filing and the Department's approval of EES for 2020, 2021, and 2022 using specific allocation factors.

identified in the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans. D.P.U. 19-136, at 5. The Department approved 2021 and 2022 EES using the same factors. Cape Light Compact JPE, D.P.U. 20-122, at 4-5 (2020); Cape Light Compact JPE, D.P.U. 21-119, at 7 (2021)....

AI summary The text discusses the approval and allocation of shared costs by the Department of Public Utilities (DPU) in relation to the Compact's energy efficiency budget, particularly focusing on the allocation of legal and consumer advocacy costs. The DPU has expressed concerns about the proposed allocation of 70% of these costs to the energy efficiency budget.

xh. Compact-2, at 146). The Compact proposes to determine what allocation method to Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 296 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 283 use for these costs based on its Govern...

AI summary The document outlines the positions of the Attorney General and the Cape Light Compact regarding the allocation of shared costs between municipal aggregation and energy efficiency programs. The Attorney General supports the proposed allocation methods, while the Compact argues that its Governing Board should determine the allocation process.

ree-Year Plans Order, at 140. While the Governing Board may work with the Compact to develop a cost-allocation proposal, the Department must ensure that the Compact spends its ratepayer- provided energy efficiency funds in a reasonable and...

AI summary The text discusses the role of the Compact as a municipal aggregator and Program Administrator, emphasizing its responsibility to ensure that energy efficiency funds are used reasonably and prudently. It also highlights the Compact’s obligation to make rate recovery filings and be subject to the same regulatory standards as investor-owned utilities.

ng mechanism otherwise available to municipal aggregators pursuant to a municipal aggregation plan or G.L. c. 164, § 134(b).179 It is a fully funded reconciling mechanism available to 176 As we have stated previously, while the Compact is...

AI summary The text discusses the oversight of energy efficiency programs by the Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.) and the legal framework governing municipal aggregation plans and energy efficiency cost recovery mechanisms. It emphasizes the Department's role in ensuring proper cost allocation and the standards applied to energy efficiency plans.

rogram Administrators properly allocate costs to their energy efficiency programs. See, e.g., 2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order, at 51; Grid Modernization, D.P.U. 20-69-A at 48-49 (2021). The proper treatment of the allocation of shared cos...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of shared costs between energy efficiency and municipal aggregation operational budgets, referencing past orders and filings. It also outlines a process for municipalities in Massachusetts to apply for funds from specific energy trust funds.

group [of] municipalities. This will not prevent said municipality or municipalities from applying to the Massachusetts clean energy technology center for additional funds. G.L. c. 164, § 134(b). 180 Pursuant to the Green Communities Act,...

AI summary The text discusses the requirement for a fully reconciling funding mechanism (EES) under the Green Communities Act and references ongoing regulatory matters related to the Compact's energy efficiency proposals and allocation methods for the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan term. It also notes the need to resolve tensions between the Compact's view of its Governing Board's discretion and the Department's ratemaking principles.

182 We note that previously the Compact has reiterated its erroneous belief that it has complied with the Department’s directive that it identify its allocation methods and factors and that the “method it identified to allocate shared cost...

AI summary The text discusses the Compact's incorrect belief that it has fulfilled the Department's directive to identify allocation methods and factors for shared costs. It references past orders and cases where allocation methods were discussed and approved, emphasizing the Department's authority to oversee the EES and investigate the appropriateness of funds collected through it.

e three-year plan context previously in approving the allocation of certain shared costs between NSTAR Electric and Western Massachusetts Electric Company (“WMECo.”) 2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order, at 125 n.59. In that instance, the Depa...

AI summary The document discusses the allocation of shared costs between NSTAR Electric and Western Massachusetts Electric Company based on methods like direct allocation and planned energy efficiency budgets. The Compact proposes allocating shared costs based on staff time spent on energy efficiency versus municipal aggregation activities in 2021.

n energy efficiency versus municipal aggregation activities in 2021. This proposed method results in an allocation of 95 percent of these shared costs to the energy efficiency budget and five percent to the municipal aggregation operationa...

AI summary The Department is evaluating the reasonableness of the Compact’s proposed allocation method for shared costs between energy efficiency and municipal aggregation programs. The method allocates 95% of costs to energy efficiency and 5% to municipal aggregation based on employee hours. The Department must ensure this does not improperly subsidize the aggregation program through the energy efficiency budget.

to apportion shared costs under these circumstances, the Department must now consider whether 2021 is an appropriately representative period upon which to set allocation factors for the 186 In its 2022 EES filing, the Compact stated that t...

AI summary The Department is evaluating whether using 2021 as the representative year for cost allocation in the Compact's 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan is reasonable, given the rigorous process of preparing such filings and the potential for higher employee hours in development years.

ableness of the proposed allocations as well as the prudence of the expenditure of the actual costs. In order for any shared consumer advocacy costs to be allocated to the energy efficiency budget and ultimately recovered through the EES,...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of shared consumer advocacy costs to the energy efficiency budget and their recovery through the EES. It emphasizes the need for a clear and direct energy efficiency-related benefit to Massachusetts ratepayers and the Department, and cautions against subsidizing non-energy efficiency functions.

municipal aggregation operating budget. D.P.U. 19-136, Compact Brief at 12 (January 13, 2021). In its 2022 EES filing, the Compact proposes an allocation of shared legal/consumer advocacy costs of 13 percent to the energy efficiency budget...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources is considering the Compact's proposal to allocate shared legal and consumer advocacy costs between the energy efficiency budget and the municipal aggregation budget. The proposal allocates 13% to energy efficiency and 88% to municipal aggregation, which aligns with previous directives. However, the final allocation will be reviewed by the Department in future proceedings.

ncome programs in 2016-2018. Cape Light Compact, D.P.U. 16-127, 2013-2015 Energy Efficiency Term Report, Part One at 18 (2013-2015 Customer Sector Cost Allocation) (August 1, 2016); Cape Light Compact, D.P.U. 19-96, 2016-2018 Energy Effici...

AI summary The Cape Light Compact's energy efficiency programs have faced challenges in achieving planned benefits, particularly in low-income programs, where benefits were 47% lower during the 2016-2018 term. The Compact recovers program costs from all electric ratepayers through a fully funded mechanism, and customers cannot opt out of paying for these programs. The 2019 Plan-Year Report indicates that only 8.8% of the Compact’s budget was spent on low-income programs.

NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 318 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 305 b. Program Budget EGMA and NSTAR Gas requests approval of an aggregated program budget (Exhs. NSTAR Gas-2, at 141; EGMA-2, at 141). NSTAR Gas and EGMA...

AI summary EGMA and NSTAR Gas request approval for an aggregated program budget for their 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan. They propose to track energy efficiency costs separately in each company’s accounting system and allocate common resource costs based on planned net benefits, energy efficiency budgets, and customer numbers in each service territory. They also plan to track spending for low-income gas energy efficiency programs and use an aggregated budget for mid-term modification triggers.

ram Administrators Brief at 81). Further, EGMA and NSTAR Gas maintain that Department approval of their proposal will result in no adverse impacts to customers of either company (Program Administrators Brief at 81). Date Filed: April 29, 2...

AI summary EGMA and NSTAR Gas argue that consolidating their energy efficiency budgets will reduce administrative and regulatory burdens and lead to cost savings. They also propose calculating performance incentives based on combined performance, allocating costs based on service territory benefits and allowing flexibility for strategic electrification.

ting has the potential to achieve efficiencies. D.P.U. 12-110/D.P.U. 12-111, at 137. Although NSTAR Gas and EGMA will adopt an aggregated program budget, each company will track spending separately for the Three-Year Plan term and allocate...

AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.) has approved the aggregated energy efficiency budget proposal by NSTAR Gas and EGMA, ensuring transparency and compliance with low-income spending requirements. The companies will maintain separate savings goals despite the aggregated budget approach.

AR Gas and EGMA to calculate and report performance incentives on an individual-company basis.198 2013-2015 Three-Year Plans Order, at 141. f. Conclusion With the exception of the proposed joint performance incentive mechanism, the Departm...

AI summary The Department approves the consolidated Three-Year Plan by NSTAR Gas and EGMA, with the exception of the proposed joint performance incentive mechanism. NSTAR Gas and EGMA are required to allocate 20% of their energy efficiency budgets to the low-income sector and file all required reports for the term.

the low-income sector. In addition, NSTAR Gas and EGMA shall file all Annual Reports and Term Reports (and related documents) for this Three-Year Plans term, both on an individual and an aggregate basis. The Department will review the perf...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for NSTAR Gas and EGMA to file reports and update screening models as part of their compliance with the Three-Year Plans. It also discusses the Program Administrators' proposal to include energy savings from a Codes and Standards Compliance and Technical Support initiative in their Three-Year Plans.

mm 1-1). The Program Administrators provided a log documenting these activities from 2017 through 2021, along with letters from state Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 328 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-12...

AI summary The Program Administrators provided documentation of activities from 2017 to 2021 and propose an evaluation in 2022 to improve savings claims for 2023 and 2024. They argue that their CSCS activities during 2019-2021 generated savings that should be recognized in future terms.

that this proposal is not part of the record and, therefore, the Department cannot not consider it (Program Administrator Reply Brief at 4). b. Attorney General The Attorney General argues that the Department should reject the Program Admi...

AI summary The Attorney General argues that the Program Administrators' proposal to claim savings from lobbying efforts related to appliance standards legislation should be rejected due to insufficient evidence linking the savings directly to their actions. They also agree with DOER that compliance should be distinguished from adoption of appliance standards.

the Council’s EM&V consultant (Exh. DOER-Comm 1-1, at 2). The Program Administrators shall submit such study with their 2022 Annual Reports. Pending the Department’s review of the study, the Program Administrators may include a ten percent...

AI summary The Department is concerned about the Program Administrators' alleged actions under the EM&V process and their decision not to appeal a decision affecting their ability to present information. The EM&V framework, approved in the 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, ensures independence and objectivity through the EM&V consultant and the Council's oversight.

Page 325 reasonable and are consistent with the achievement of all available cost-effective energy-efficiency and demand-reduction resources. The Department has reviewed the Three-Year Plans and finds that they are constructed in a manner...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resource Development has reviewed the Three-Year Plans and found them to be consistent with GHG emissions reduction goals. It has directed Program Administrators to implement these plans while minimizing administrative costs, using competitive procurement, and ensuring sufficient funding for low-income programs.

022-2024 Three-Year Plans (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. Q). The Department finds that Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 339 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 326 each Program Administrator: (1) has a...

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resource Development approves the Three-Year Plans for energy efficiency programs, finding them cost-effective and aligned with the Green Communities Act. Program Administrators are approved to recover implementation costs through the Energy Efficiency Service (EES), with performance incentives tied to meeting specific goals.

c. 25, §§ 19(a), 21(b)(2)(vii). In particular, the Department finds that the proposed budgets are appropriately designed to achieve savings goals while minimizing customer rate impacts. Subject to the modifications and disallowances addres...

AI summary The Department approves the Program Administrators' Three-Year Plans and budgets, subject to modifications and disallowances, aligning with the Green Communities Act and guidelines. Compliance filings with updated data, BCR models, and performance indicators are required within 60 days.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-19: 2 3 Page 39 of 65 of the Application: 4 5 (a) Please explain how E1 plans to...

AI summary E1's 2023-2025 DSM Settlement Plan aims to increase Electric Efficiency Spending as a percentage of NS Power’s annual revenue, aligning more closely with peer utilities. Current spending was 1.8% and 2.3% in 2020 and 2021, respectively, and the plan projects 3.5%, 3.8%, and 4.2% for 2023, 2024, and 2025.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 [Evidence] 2 Request IR-20: 3 4 On p. 41 of 65, E1 stated that the Settlement Plan “proposes...

AI summary E1 provided a table comparing NSUARB-approved DSM spending levels with actual spending from 2012 to 2022, highlighting variances between approved and actual investments. E1 argues that increased DSM investment is necessary to counteract lower investment levels in previous years.

1 Request IR-31: 2 3 Appendix A, page 32 of 149: please describe the modelling quality assurance process in more 4 detail. Within this response, please specially address how this process ensures accuracy in all 5 assumption and variables u...

AI summary The response to Request IR-31 details the quality assurance process used in the DSM Plan modelling, including validation of inputs, segregation of duties, and consistency checks on assumptions and variables.

1 Project eligibility criteria include the following: 2 • All projects must reduce or offset electrical energy or demand. The savings from a 3 project cannot exceed the actual usage provided by Nova Scotia Power (where 4 baseline data exis...

AI summary The text outlines eligibility criteria for energy efficiency programs, including requirements for project energy savings, payback periods, building codes, and eligible costs. Projects must reduce energy use or demand, meet specific savings thresholds, and comply with building regulations. Eligible measures must save energy or reduce peak demand, and eligible costs include engineering expenses.

constructed to the latest version of ASHRAE/IESNA standard. The Department of Education also requires that new facilities constructed with FY14 funds must be constructed to the same ASHRAE standards. Senate Bill 220 also directed the Offic...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency policies in Alaska, including adherence to ASHRAE/IESNA standards for new facilities, Senate Bill 220's mandate for energy data collection via ARIS, a $250M revolving loan fund for retrofits, and the role of ESCOs and AIDEA in facilitating ESPCs and loans. Benchmarking efforts and state-led initiatives are highlighted.

pproves SRP’s funding for demand-side management. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: April 2022 ","Under the...

AI summary Arizona's energy efficiency programs, administered by utilities like APS and TEP under the state's EERS, are funded via adjustor mechanisms or surcharges. The ACC approves funding, while utilities set targets such as Salt River Project's 20% retail sales goal through efficiency and renewables by FY2020.

ycle cost analysis. The Arkansas Energy Office must update this program annually. HB 1663 also directed the Arkansas Energy Office to complete an energy audit of every public agency within five years. In May 2009, Governor Mike Beebe issue...

AI summary Arkansas has implemented several energy efficiency policies, including annual program updates, energy audits for public agencies, strategic energy plans, and the Energy Performance Contracting Program. These initiatives aim to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy use across state agencies and public buildings.

ch include provisions for demand-side resources. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. For further reading, in March 2011, as p...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Arkansas, including the establishment of energy efficiency resource standards, cost recovery mechanisms, and the expansion of programs by utilities to meet annual targets. It references regulatory actions and reports related to these initiatives.

efficiency targets. Recovery of direct program costs associated with commission-approved energy efficiency programs is accomplished through an energy efficiency cost recovery rider on customer bills. The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary The Commission approved Resource Planning Guidelines for Electric Utilities in Docket 06-028-R, requiring utilities to consider demand-side resources for incremental capacity needs. Energy efficiency cost recovery is handled through a rider on customer bills, and EERS was established in 2010 to require utilities to file energy efficiency plans. Savings targets for 2020-2022 are 1.20% for electric utilities and 0.5% for natural gas utilities.

tility energy efficiency programs. All investor-owned utilities were approved to recover lost revenues as part of the annual energy efficiency program tariff docket (See Order No. 14 Docket 08-137-U). In 2007 rate cases, the Arkansas PSC a...

AI summary Arkansas allows investor-owned utilities to recover lost revenues from energy efficiency programs through a BDA tariff, approved by the PSC in 2007. Energy efficiency performance incentives are awarded annually based on achievement of performance goals. However, Arkansas has no policy requiring utilities to release energy use data or focused policies on energy efficiency in transportation.

nditures. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","No policy in place or proposed. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",0 out of 3,"Arkansas has not set appliance standards beyond those required by the federal government. Last Reviewed: June 2019 ", California,1...

AI summary Arkansas has not implemented appliance standards beyond federal requirements, while California offers a range of energy efficiency incentives, including PACE financing, high performance grants, and leads by example through energy benchmarking and building efficiency requirements.

ant: The High Performance Incentive (HPI) grant is a supplemental grant available to districts with projects that have increased costs associated with high performance attributes in school facilities. The Governor's Strategic Growth Plan,...

AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency and incentive programs in California, including the High Performance Incentive (HPI) grant, Energy Partnership Program, Bright Schools Program, and Statewide Energy Efficiency Program (SWEEP), all aimed at promoting high performance attributes in school facilities and other public buildings.

Jobs Act (Proposition 39): Provides funding to local educational agencies (LEAs) for planning and installing eligible energy measures, such as energy efficiency upgrades and clean energy generation. California Capital Access Program: Calif...

AI summary The text outlines several energy efficiency and financing programs in California, including the Jobs Act, California Capital Access Program, ECAA-Ed, and CHEEF. These initiatives provide funding and incentives for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects in educational institutions and small businesses. California’s energy plans also emphasize energy equity with advisory groups and policies involving multiple state agencies.

ns have specific advisory group, policies, programs and metrics to ensure energy equity. State agencies involved include CEC, CPUC and California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The Disadvantaged Community Advisory G...

AI summary The text discusses energy equity initiatives in California, including the Disadvantaged Community Advisory Group (DACAG), the 2019 California Energy Efficiency Action Plan, and the Energy Equity Indicators Tracking Progress report. These efforts aim to improve access to energy programs for low-income and disadvantaged communities and ensure data collection and collaboration across agencies.

al gas lines. Many of these residents have been using propane or wood for heating; once the San Joaquin Pilot is implemented, they will instead have modern space and water heating heat pump equipment. CPUC’s Building Initiative for Low-Emi...

AI summary The CPUC’s BUILD program funds all-electric low-income residential buildings using cap and trade revenue, with incentives for energy efficiency and affordability. The CEC provides tools like the Utility Allowance Calculator to support energy efficiency in low-income housing, and HCD offers programs that promote sustainable development and reduce GHG emissions.

ber, 2030. DGS will be developing statewide policy to ensure compliance with this statute and will continue to work to adopt more zero-emission vehicles in the medium and heavy duty weight categories. Last Updated: August 2020 ","Under the...

AI summary The Department of General Services (DGS) in California manages energy service company (ESCO) projects for state buildings, implementing energy efficiency initiatives and utilizing alternative financing mechanisms. As of 2019, ESCO projects had achieved significant energy savings and were expanding across state facilities.

er Architectural Aluminum, American Society of Home Inspectors (ASHI), Nevada County Contractors Association, Valley Contractors Exchange, International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), OJ Insulation, newly develop...

AI summary In 2019, the Statewide Codes and Standards Compliance Improvement (CI) Subprogram, implemented by California’s investor-owned utilities and the California Energy Commission (CEC), focused on behavior change across the building and appliance efficiency supply chains. The Subprogram delivered training, outreach, and tools to support compliance with the 2019 Energy Code, reaching over 3,600 students with a high satisfaction rate.

encourage CHP including interconnection standards, incentive programs, financial assistance, and additional supportive policies. In 2018, five new CHP installations were completed. ","Policy: Rule 21 Description: California was among the f...

AI summary The text discusses California's policies and regulations supporting combined heat and power (CHP) systems, including Rule 21, which establishes interconnection standards for distributed generation. Assembly Bill 32 and the Governor’s Clean Energy Jobs Program set CHP deployment targets, while Assembly Bill 1890 and 995 emphasize energy efficiency and renewable resources over new fossil-fuel generation.

he electric utilities to hold solicitations between 2015 and 2020 to procure energy and capacity from efficient CHP resources sufficient to achieve 2.72 MMTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Revenue streams: CHP systems in Califo...

AI summary The text discusses how California electric utilities procure energy and capacity from efficient combined heat and power (CHP) resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It outlines revenue streams, including feed-in tariffs and standard offer contracts, established by regulatory bodies such as the CPUC and the California Energy Commission.

ist CHP facilities in meeting the eligibility and interconnection requirements of the standard offer contracts available through the state's CHP feed-in-tarrif and the state's implementation of PURPA. The CA IOUs frequently issue Requests...

AI summary The document discusses California's policies and programs supporting combined heat and power (CHP) facilities, including standard offer contracts, feed-in tariffs, and incentives for renewable-fueled CHP systems. It also highlights the role of the California IOUs in issuing Requests for Offers (RFOs) for Local Capacity Resources (LCRs), with some RFOs targeting renewable DG and energy storage, while others include natural gas CHP. The BioMAT Program and SB 859 are also mentioned as key initiatives.

lectric and gas IOUs. Over the first five years (2020-2025) targets translate to roughly 1.6% gross electric savings and 0.6% gross gas savings, including codes & standards supportive efforts (link). The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs administered by investor-owned utilities (IOUs) and publicly-owned utilities (POUs) in California, with oversight by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Programs are funded through public benefits, on-bill financing, and AB 32 cap and trade funds. Targets for energy savings are outlined for 2020-2025.

the Air Resources Board (ARB) and other state agencies to implement AB 32. In 2016, SB 32 was passed to further require the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40% below the 1990 level by 2030. Beginning in fiscal year 2013-2014, Ca...

AI summary California has prioritized energy efficiency as a primary resource for meeting new energy demands, driven by legislation such as AB 1890 and AB 995. The CPUC has set aggressive efficiency targets and funding, and in Decision 12-11-015, mandated a 5% market spillover effects adder for program tracking claims. The state also allocated significant funds through Prop. 39 for energy efficiency and clean energy in schools.

works, and community choice aggregators to apply a market spillover effects adder of 5% to their program tracking claims, acknowledging the impacts of energy efficiency programs on the market overall. In August 2019, in a move that helps a...

AI summary The text discusses modifications to California's energy efficiency policies by the CPUC, including the introduction of a market spillover effects adder for efficiency programs and updates to the three-prong test related to fuel substitution. These changes aim to align energy efficiency efforts with climate goals and increase the use of energy efficiency funds for electrification. SB 350 has also led to the doubling of energy efficiency targets by 2030.

3, the CPUC developed new electric and natural gas goals in 2008 for years 2012 through 2020, which call for 16,300 GWh of gross electric savings over the 9-year period (see CPUC Decision 08-07-047). In 2015, California essentially doubled...

AI summary The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has set energy efficiency goals since 2008, including doubling targets with SB 350 in 2015 and updating them in 2019. The evaluation of energy efficiency programs uses cost-effectiveness tests and is overseen by the CPUC.

customers under a straight fixed-variable rate design, which continues through today. The CPUC stopped the electric decoupling mechanisms in 1996 due to restructuring of the electric power industry. In 2001, the Legislature passed Section...

AI summary The text discusses the history and current implementation of decoupling mechanisms in California, including the resumption of decoupling in 2001 and its integration with performance incentives for energy efficiency. It also references the Energy Savings and Performance Incentive (ESPI) established by the California Public Utilities Commission.

13) allocates incentive earnings among four major categories: Energy Efficiency Resource Savings; Ex Ante Review Process Performance; Codes and Standards Advocacy Programs; and Non-Resource Program: Incentives for energy efficiency resourc...

AI summary The text outlines the allocation of incentive earnings across four categories, including caps on energy efficiency incentives and management fees for utility involvement in codes and standards programs. It also discusses the ESPI mechanism and the Commission's approval of third-party access to energy data through the EDRP and Energy Data Access Committee.

owned utilities do not charge a fee for providing data. Costs incurred by utilities for data management and request fulfilment are tracked in a balancing account and funded through general rate cases. Data provided via Green Button Connect...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for the provision of energy use data, including the process for requesting data, confidentiality measures, and the exclusion of buildings with fewer than 15 tenants from Whole Building Usage Information. It also mentions the authorization for data sharing with third parties and government entities.

Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The California Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Housing Program, administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) provides $2.85 billion for housing and infrastructure programs within...

AI summary The California Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Housing Program provides $2.85 billion for housing and infrastructure near transit stations, requiring 15% of units to be affordable. HCD’s AHSC Program and other initiatives prioritize low-income housing near transit, with funding and requirements outlined in Assembly Bill 101 and Health and Safety Code.

ncluding car share, bike share, vanpool, and ridesourcing) in disadvantaged communities using advanced clean vehicles (zero-emission or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles) and associated infrastructure. The Sustainable Transportation Equity...

AI summary The Sustainable Transportation Equity Project (STEP) and CARB's Clean Mobility in Schools program aim to improve transportation equity and reduce GHG emissions in disadvantaged communities through clean mobility initiatives. These programs include funding for planning, implementation, and financing assistance for lower-income consumers to access zero-emission vehicles and related infrastructure.

. California’s Title 20 Appliance Efficiency Regulations have long had existing provisions that backstop all other federal appliance standards in case of repeal or rollback (Title 20 section 1605(a)). Last Reviewed: December 2021 ", Colora...

AI summary Colorado offers various energy efficiency incentives, including the Energy Saving Mortgage Program, which provides credits for purchasing or renovating efficient homes. The state also supports PACE financing and leads by example with energy-saving initiatives in public facilities.

nicipal utilities, and electric cooperatives. All utilities are subject to the rules (except small municipal utilities) and credit net excess generation on the customer's next bill at the retail rate. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Some addit...

AI summary Colorado encourages combined heat and power (CHP) and waste heat to power (WHP) through financial incentives, with Xcel Energy providing $500 per kilowatt over 10 years. Energy efficiency programs are administered by utilities under the Public Utilities Commission's oversight, with goals set by legislation in 2007.

expanded their demand-side management (DSM) programs in recent years. The utilities file DSM plans annually, and are working toward the most recent EERS targets which have ramped up to 1.68% in 2020. HB 1227, signed in June 2017, extends e...

AI summary Colorado has expanded its demand-side management (DSM) programs, with utilities submitting annual DSM plans and aiming for EERS targets of 1.68% in 2020. HB 1227, enacted in 2017, extends electric efficiency programs to 2028 and mandates 5% peak demand reduction and energy savings goals. Xcel Energy and Black Hills Energy are the major utilities administering these programs, funded through a DSM cost adjustment mechanism rate rider.

Connecticut as the first state to implement the statewide adoption of home energy scores. As of Spring 2019, 33,952 DOE home energy scores have been distributed to Home Energy Solutions participants. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Connecticut...

AI summary Connecticut has implemented a statewide home energy score program and a 'Lead by Example' initiative to reduce energy use in state buildings. The state has allocated $88 million for energy efficiency retrofits, with significant savings achieved through completed and approved projects. The initiative includes energy audits, cost-effective measures, and financial support mechanisms.

chmarking data. Additionally, Connecticut utilities have launched the Automated Data Transfer Project to benchmark municipal, board of education, houses of worship, and other local business buildings. The Institute for Sustainable Energy (...

AI summary Connecticut utilities have initiated the Automated Data Transfer Project to benchmark various local buildings. The Institute for Sustainable Energy (ISE) has established a Benchmarking Help Desk to assist towns, agencies, and schools with energy benchmarking and Portfolio Manager training. ISE has benchmarked over 900 buildings and provided technical assistance to multiple organizations, leading to energy-saving initiatives like LED lighting upgrades.

m ISE, CTHSS implemented LED lighting upgrades through the utility-run Small Business Energy Advantage Program and received a 2016 CT Green-Circle Sustainability Award for its energy saving successes. Connecticut’s Small Business Energy Ad...

AI summary Connecticut implemented energy efficiency initiatives through the Small Business Energy Advantage Program and the Demand Reduction Program, leading to significant cost and emissions reductions. These efforts were recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with an Energy Star Partner of the Year award in 2017.

s a result of these efforts, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognized Energize Connecticut Partners as the 2017 Energy Star Partner of the Year for Energy Efficiency Program Delivery. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","CT St...

AI summary The document highlights Energize Connecticut Partners' recognition by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for energy efficiency efforts. It also outlines Connecticut's legislative requirements for state fleet acquisitions and energy management plans, including the establishment of the Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) Program to improve energy efficiency in state buildings.

pital. The costs of the energy retrofits are paid for by future guaranteed savings from utility and maintenance budgets. The new program, replaces the program ESPC program that existed prior to 2011. The State’s ESPC Program includes a num...

AI summary The State’s ESPC Program, which replaced the pre-2011 program, includes tools to minimize risk and simplify performance contracting. It features standardized contracts, pre-qualified ESCOs, and technical support. SB 334 revised the definition of 'cost effective' in 2016, extending the payback period and removing outdated requirements. There are currently 46 active ESPC projects in state and University of Connecticut buildings.

Last reviewed: August 2021 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: A proposal to conduct third party plan review and site studies has been approved by DEEP in its 2013-2015 C&LM draft decision. The Department of Construction Services a...

AI summary The document outlines a gap analysis and strategic compliance plan approved by DEEP in 2013-2015 for conducting third-party plan reviews and site studies. It also mentions baseline and updated compliance studies, including a 2018 code compliance study on single-family homes in Connecticut and a 2015 commercial and industrial compliance study by DNV-GL. These studies assess compliance rates and potential energy savings.

by Eversource, United Illuminating, Connecticut Natural Gas, and Southern Connecticut Gas. The utilities administer the programs and utilize a robust, highly-skilled green workforce to implement them. In 2007, the Connecticut legislature e...

AI summary Connecticut's energy efficiency initiatives, including the 2019-2021 Conservation & Load Management Plan, aim to achieve significant energy and cost savings, reduce emissions, and develop a green workforce. The legislation, starting with Public Act 07-242, prioritizes energy efficiency and established mechanisms like decoupling. The Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (DEEP) plays a central role in developing the Comprehensive Energy Strategy.

ivate capital, continuing to target C&I market segments to deliver tailored measures and custom approaches, and to evaluate and implement demand reduction strategies for residential and C&I customers. In 2019, the three primary funding sou...

AI summary The document outlines Connecticut’s energy efficiency program funding sources, including a systems benefit charge, a Conservation Adjustment Mechanism, and contributions from natural gas customers. It also mentions the Energy Efficiency Dashboard and references the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and the Forward Capacity Market as additional funding sources.

s, as well as for residential financing programs. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Prior to pa...

AI summary This text discusses Connecticut's energy efficiency and integrated resource planning requirements, including the impact of Public Act 07-242 and Public Act 11-80. It outlines the obligation of electric distribution companies to develop comprehensive resource plans and the requirement for utilities to prioritize energy efficiency and demand reduction resources. The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is also working to refresh the 2020 integrated resource plan.

rning Implementation of Connecticut’s Comprehensive Energy Strategy and Various Revisions to the Energy Statutes, adopted the requirement (again) of decoupling for all electric distribution companies. Currently, United Illuminating uses a...

AI summary This text discusses the implementation of decoupling mechanisms in Connecticut's electric and natural gas distribution companies, including the use of lost-based revenue recovery and performance management incentives tied to energy efficiency goals. It also outlines the introduction of new metrics for tracking energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions reductions.

21 Plan, the utilities also plan to introduce an MMBtu-based or a greenhouse gas emissions reductions-based metric for tracking purposes. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Guidelines for Third Party Access Under Gen. Stats. §16-245o(d) and Regul...

AI summary The document discusses energy use data policies in Connecticut, including third-party access requirements, public availability of non-residential building energy data, and the use of dashboards to track energy efficiency programs and consumption metrics. It also mentions the introduction of new metrics for tracking purposes.

ticut’s 169 towns and cities. The individual town pages also detail the participation of Connecticut’s households and businesses in energy efficiency programs, as well as Residential Rebates redeemed. The design and implementation of digit...

AI summary This text discusses Connecticut's energy efficiency programs, including the implementation of digital customer engagement platforms by utilities during the 2016-2018 Conservation & Load Management Plan. It also outlines Connecticut's transportation policies, such as tailpipe emissions standards and the adoption of California’s Low-Emission Vehicle and Zero Emission Vehicle programs.

s, and they consider proximity to transit facilities when distributing federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits to qualifying property owners. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","No policy in place or proposed. Last Updated: July 2018 ","Connecticut...

AI summary Connecticut has implemented energy efficiency standards for various products, with some preempted by federal legislation. The state also offers rebates for the purchase of hydrogen and electric vehicles, with rebate amounts based on the vehicle's electric range. Additionally, federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits are distributed considering proximity to transit facilities.

also purchased two Ford Focus Electric vehicles and 16 Electric Transit buses, and plans to have 20 operating by 2021. Thanks to a new $2.6 million grant, these buses will be used throughout Delaware. Last Updated: July 2020 ","Title 29, S...

AI summary Delaware has purchased electric vehicles and buses and plans to expand their use. The Energy Performance Contracting Act encourages energy conservation measures in agency facilities, including audits and performance contracts funded by utility cost savings. The Delaware Sustainable Energy Utility offers programs for schools and agencies to enter into these contracts.

The CHP pathway is ideal for facilities with high annual hours of operation and a high thermal load. In addition, the State Revolving Loan Fund offers low-interest loans to qualifying CHP projects. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","The state pro...

AI summary The CHP pathway is ideal for facilities with high annual hours of operation and a high thermal load. Delaware supports CHP through technical assistance, state revolving loan funds, and research on low-emission microgrids. Delaware has also established Energize Delaware to deliver energy efficiency programs and has set energy efficiency goals under the Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS).

utilities. The goals are 15% electricity consumption and peak demand savings and 10% natural gas consumption savings by 2015. However, rules outlining how these goals are to be met are still pending. In 2014, the state legislature passed S...

AI summary Delaware has established energy efficiency goals of 15% electricity consumption and peak demand savings and 10% natural gas consumption savings by 2015. These goals are supported by legislation such as SB 150, which created the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) and allowed utilities to recover program costs through rates. However, rules for meeting these goals are still pending.

utilities. The goals are 15% electricity consumption and peak demand savings and 10% natural gas consumption savings by 2015. However, rules outlining how these goals are to be met are still pending. In 2014, the state legislature passed S...

AI summary Delaware has established voluntary energy efficiency targets through the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC), aiming for 15% electricity and peak demand savings and 10% natural gas savings by 2015. These targets are incremental and cost-effective, with specific annual savings goals set from 2016 to 2022. The state does not have a mandatory Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS) program.

ent of enforcement mechanisms. Given the lack of final implementation rules, and the funding and institutional challenges outlined above, Delaware's energy savings targets are considered voluntary. Established by SB 150, House Amendment 2...

AI summary Delaware's energy efficiency targets are voluntary due to a lack of final implementation rules and institutional challenges. The EEAC, established by SB 150, sets incremental energy savings goals for utilities, with targets increasing annually to reach cumulative 3-year goals. Evaluations of energy efficiency programs are mandated by the Energy Efficiency Resource Standards Act of 2009 and administered by DNREC.

cember 31, 2020, but is expected to be renewed for additional funding. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ",0 out of 3,"Delaware has not set appliance standards beyond those required by the federal government. Last Reviewed: June 2019 ", District of...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency initiatives in Delaware and the District of Columbia, including appliance standards, financial incentives, and grant programs aimed at promoting energy efficiency. It also mentions minimum spend requirements and savings goals in low-income communities.

imum spend requirement was $3,854,487 and the DCSEU spend was $4,037,174. The savings target minimum was 23,278 MMBtu (electric and fuel unit equivalents), and the DCSEU achieved 37,868 MMBtu in 2019. The DOEE has sought eligible entities...

AI summary The DCSEU exceeded its energy savings target in 2019, achieving 37,868 MMBtu compared to the minimum of 23,278 MMBtu. The DOEE is seeking entities to research utility burden among low- and moderate-income residents. The Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008 and the Clean Energy DC Omnibus Amendment Act of 2018 set benchmarking requirements for buildings over specific square footage thresholds.

uals, including architects, engineers, contractors, property managers, real estate developers and government regulators, contributed their time, through Technical Advisory Group meetings, to ensure the most appropriate codes possible. Othe...

AI summary The Green Building Act of 2006 mandates green building compliance, enforced by the Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs (DCRA). Training and outreach initiatives, including seminars and compliance tools, support project teams. The Urban Sustainability Administration (USA) provides grants for early design assistance in net-zero energy buildings, aligned with the Clean Energy DC plan aiming for net-zero energy building codes by 2026.

calls for net-zero energy building codes by 2026. Because there are few net-zero energy projects in the District, having more projects pursue net-zero energy will grow the number of available case studies and build the capacity of the deve...

AI summary The District of Columbia promotes net-zero energy buildings by 2026 and supports CHP through incentives and interconnection rules. However, there are limited policies to encourage CHP beyond these measures. The DCSGIR outlines interconnection regulations for systems up to 10 MW, and a tax credit is available for large cogeneration facilities.

entered microgrids for critical infrastructure, which will use CHP. The DC Public Service Commission is also examining a potential CHP-centered microgrid pilot project which will provide resiliency. Last Updated: August 2019 ",9.5 out of 2...

AI summary The District of Columbia has implemented energy efficiency programs funded by a systems benefits charge, initially through the Reliable Energy Trust Fund and later replaced by the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund. The DCSEU administers these programs, with performance incentives and penalties tied to meeting energy efficiency targets.

addition, DC SEU has been bidding aggregated energy efficiency measures into PJM's capacity market with DOEE's full support. For more information on energy efficiency as a resource, click here. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Summary: For FY20...

AI summary The DCSEU operates under a performance-based contract with DOEE, authorized by the Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008. It has multi-year contracts with targets expressed in BTUs, growing from 1,136,789 MMBtus in Year 1 to 6,820,733 MMBtus in Year 5. The DCSEU also participates in PJM's capacity market with DOEE's support.

to meet the required performance benchmarks.” In April 2017, DCSEU moved to operating on a five-year contract, which allows for larger, longer projects, and higher savings targets over the five years. In 2008, the District of Columbia enac...

AI summary The text discusses the establishment and evolution of the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund in the District of Columbia, replacing the Reliable Energy Trust Fund in 2008. It outlines the transition of energy efficiency program implementation from PEPCO to DCSEU in 2011 and the subsequent performance-based contract awarded to VEIC in 2017, which includes energy savings goals and evaluation criteria.

e eligible for the performance incentives for electricity and natural gas, the VEIC is required to meet the minimum performance targets for reductions in both electricity and natural gas consumption. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","For custome...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for third-party access to energy use data in DC, including the use of the Green Button platform, benchmarking laws, and data access procedures for residential and commercial customers. It also mentions the availability of aggregated data for public buildings and the role of the DC Sustainable Energy Utility.

not have interval meters, but allows third parties to electronically access and download monthly utility data with customer consent via Utility portal. Requirements for Provision of Energy Use Data Aggregated benchmarked data that have bee...

AI summary The District of Columbia mandates the provision of aggregated energy use data, including automated benchmarking services, through the Sustainable DC Act of 2014. Pepco provides automated upload of whole building electricity data to Portfolio Manager, and utilities provide detailed energy consumption data by zip code. Interval meters are largely installed, allowing third parties to access collected data.

otential assessment, and recommendations for energy conservation measures. FRED will reimburse farmers up to 80% of the cost to implement the recommendations from the energy evaluation, up to $25,000. Efficiency and Renewable Improvements...

AI summary The text discusses two energy-related programs in Florida: FRED, which provides financial assistance to farmers for energy conservation measures, and ERICA, which supports energy efficiency and renewable improvements in commercial aquaculture. It also mentions the Florida Energy and Climate Plan, focusing on reducing energy burdens for low-income communities and evaluating energy equity across the state.

ce green building rating system as approved by the department. State agencies also must lease ENERGY STAR-rated buildings and employ energy saving performance contracts to upgrade existing facilities. In 2008, the Florida Legislature passe...

AI summary The Florida Energy Conservation and Sustainable Buildings Act of 2008 mandates state agencies to adopt sustainable building practices and energy efficiency measures. This includes leasing ENERGY STAR-rated buildings and using energy-saving performance contracts. The Florida Department of Management Services developed the Florida Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Program and the State Energy Management Plan to support energy reduction efforts. House Bill 7117 in 2012 added requirements for agencies to report energy use data for buildings over 5,000 square feet.

n energy use by each building owned or leased for state business 5,000 square feet or more. The statute requires that agencies collect energy usage and cost data, but does not specify a tracking tool. All State government-owned buildings l...

AI summary The text discusses Florida's energy use reporting requirements for state buildings over 5,000 square feet, including annual benchmarking and data collection. It also outlines executive orders and statutes requiring state agencies to prioritize fuel-efficient vehicle purchases and maintenance practices to reduce emissions.

f “renewable energy.” Some CHP systems may be interpreted as using “waste heat” as a primary fuel, but there is no wording that clearly defines CHP as eligible for interconnection using this standard. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","There are...

AI summary The text discusses the eligibility of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems in Florida for interconnection and incentives. It highlights that CHP systems may be considered renewable energy and are eligible for tax incentives, but there are no state policies specifically targeting CHP for energy savings or generation. The Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (FEECA) mandates energy-efficiency programs for utilities.

quires each utility to implement cost-effective energy-efficiency programs and to conduct energy audits. It also includes improving the efficiency of generation, transmission and distribution systems. FEECA also established the authority f...

AI summary FEECA requires utilities to implement energy-efficiency programs and conduct energy audits. The Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) sets energy and peak demand savings targets and may allow utilities to earn an additional return on equity for achieving energy efficiency goals. The FPSC reviewed and continued existing goals through 2024.

ic, mandatory requirement for increasing state fleet efficiency. State alternative-fuel vehicle procurement requirements that give a voluntary option to count efficient vehicles are thus not included. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","Georgia ha...

AI summary Georgia has implemented performance contracting in state government facilities, with $90 million in contracts over six years. The Georgia Environmental Finance Authority (GEFA) funds the Southface Energy Institute for research and training on energy-efficient housing. The Georgia Institute of Technology's Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems conducts research on efficient water and power infrastructures.

June 2020 ","Georgia does not allow for large customers to self-direct the funds they would have paid for energy efficiency, nor to opt-out entirely from participating in energy efficiency programs. Last updated: July 2018 ","Georgia Code...

AI summary Georgia does not permit large energy customers to self-direct energy efficiency funds or opt out of participation in such programs. The state code allows electric utilities to recover costs and an additional sum for approved energy efficiency programs. Georgia Power has multiple certified programs and provides tools for energy data access and benchmarking.

et. The benchmarking project found potential for all state agencies to save more than 56 million kilowatt hours annually—the equivalent to saving more than $25 million using current electricity rates. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","House...

AI summary The benchmarking project identified significant energy savings potential for state agencies in Hawaii, with potential annual electricity savings of over 56 million kilowatt hours and $25 million in cost savings. House Bill 2175 promotes fuel-efficient vehicle purchases based on life-cycle cost-benefit analysis, and Hawaii Revised Statute 196-30 mandates energy efficiency retrofits through performance contracting. Hawaii has implemented large-scale ESPC projects, including a $158 million airport retrofit, yielding substantial energy savings.

cing: In July 2013, Hawaii enacted legislation allowing the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to issue Green Infrastructure Bonds for clean energy installations, including CHP. Net metering: Small biomass energy sys...

AI summary Hawaii has implemented policies to support clean energy and energy efficiency, including Green Infrastructure Bonds and a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) aiming for 100% renewable energy by 2045. Energy efficiency programs are managed by HECO and KIUC, with HECO using a public benefits charge to fund these initiatives. Hawaii collaborates with the U.S. Department of Energy to achieve 70% renewable and efficiency-based energy by 2030.

in place or proposed. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",1.5 out of 3,"Hawaii adopted appliance standards for five products in 2019 and adopted a backstop to adopt federal standards in case they are repealed Last Updated: July 2019 ","Products ado...

AI summary Hawaii adopted appliance standards for five products in 2019 and implemented a backstop to adopt federal standards if they are repealed. Idaho offers energy efficiency incentives, including tax deductions, loans, and grants, but lacks benchmarking and fuel efficiency requirements for public buildings and fleets. Neither state has a comprehensive energy or climate action plan that includes metrics for marginalized groups or clean energy workforce development.

e Energy Circuit Rider. The Idaho Code Collaborative includes the Office of Energy and Mineral Resources, the state’s electric investor-owned utilities, and the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. Last Updated: July 2021 ",,"The state ha...

AI summary Idaho has limited policies to encourage CHP deployment, with no interconnection standards or state-wide policies to acquire energy savings or generation from CHP. Some financing options exist, such as low-interest energy loans and the Renewable Energy Project Bond Program. Energy efficiency programs are administered by investor-owned utilities under the oversight of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission.

ogram staff oversaw the implementation of over $491 million in energy efficient capital improvements through performance contract arrangements resulting in over $35 million in combined annual savings. The state has recently entered into a...

AI summary The state has implemented energy performance contracts (ESPCs) for public facilities, resulting in over $35 million in annual savings. A new contract for six Department of Human Services' facilities in Chicago is expected to save $10 million annually. The State Energy Office supports ESPCs through technical assistance and has issued an RFP for streetlight replacements as a master contract.

Last reviewed: July 2019 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The State Energy Office (Illinois Dept. of Commerce and Economic Opportunity) worked with BCAP to complete a gap analysis in 2010 and a strategic compliance plan in 2011....

AI summary The Illinois State Energy Office has conducted multiple studies on building code compliance rates, including a 2010 baseline study and an updated 2014 evaluation. Compliance rates for residential buildings were found to be 79% and 81.3%, while commercial compliance rates were not fully determined due to lack of participation. Utilities are involved in training and technical assistance programs, and the Energy Codes Enhancement Program is forming a Stakeholder Advisory Committee.

he Future Energy Jobs Bill (SB 2814), raising overall utility energy efficiency targets to require ComEd and Ameren to achieve cumulative 21.5% and 16% reductions in energy use, respectively, by 2030. Illinois established a natural gas EER...

AI summary Illinois passed SB 2814, which raised utility energy efficiency targets and increased the cost cap for energy efficiency programs. The legislation shifted program administration to utilities and transitioned goals to focus on long-term cumulative savings. Natural gas energy efficiency programs were also established with specific savings targets.

first-year savings to goals related to longer-term cumulative persistent annual savings. The utilities also offer on-bill financing opportunities to their customers for energy efficiency measures. Section 16-111.5B of the Illinois Public U...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Illinois, referencing statutory provisions that allow for additional procurement of cost-effective energy efficiency measures. It highlights the increase in utility expenditures on these programs and mentions the approval of a new 5-year energy efficiency plan. Budgets for these programs and their savings are referenced in State Spending and Savings Tables.

indirect costs to consumers. It serves the public interest to allow natural gas utilities to recover costs for reasonably and prudently incurred expenses for cost-effective energy efficiency measures. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Summary: E...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs in Illinois, including the Illinois Power Agency Act (IPAA), the Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS), and the Future Energy Jobs Bill (SB 2814). These measures set incremental energy savings targets for utilities and require investment in low-income energy efficiency programs.

bonds. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","No program in place or proposed. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",0 out of 3,"Illinois has not set appliance standards beyond those required by the federal government. Last Reviewed: June 2019 ", Indiana,37,11....

AI summary The text discusses the lack of appliance standards in Illinois beyond federal requirements, Indiana's residential tax credit for insulation, and the absence of specific policies to ensure equity in energy access or workforce development. It also mentions the Green Project Reserve Revolving Loan Fund in Indiana and the absence of a disclosure policy.

th new plans slated to run 2019-2021. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables on the left. Last Updated: October 2018 ","Under cur...

AI summary Electric utilities in Indiana are required to submit resource and energy efficiency plans under the Indiana Administrative Code, with recent changes aligning these requirements with SEA 412. The updated rules require integrated resource plans and energy efficiency plans to be submitted periodically and include EM&V procedures conducted by independent third-party administrators.

by the state. IEDA provided funding to the Prison Industries Training Program, an effort to train incarcerated Iowans in construction, with an emphasis on energy efficiency and high performing homes. The State Energy Plan has four pillars,...

AI summary The document discusses the Iowa Energy Workforce Consortium, established by Iowa utilities to address workforce needs in the energy sector, and outlines the State Energy Plan's focus on economic development and energy careers. It also mentions the requirement for public buildings to comply with the 2012 IECC code and the use of LCCA for energy equipment in public facilities.

including natural gas-fired units less than 10 mmBTU/hr and units less than 1 mmBtu/hr powered by coal, fuel oil, untreated wood, untreated seeds or pellets, or other untreated vegetative materials. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",4 out of 20,"...

AI summary Iowa's utilities administer energy efficiency programs under the oversight of the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) and the Office of Consumer Advocate. These programs are mandated for rate-regulated utilities and include voluntary goals for municipal utilities and cooperatives. Program costs are recovered through tariff riders. In 2018, utilities filed new plans with lower savings targets, and a bill allows customers to request exemptions based on the RIM test.

line. Industrial Revenue Bonds: State and local government-issued bonds to finance industrial buildings, as defined by KRS 103.200. This financing can cover the cost of energy efficiency projects. Local Government Efficiency Retrofit Progr...

AI summary The text discusses financing mechanisms for energy efficiency, such as Industrial Revenue Bonds and the Local Government Efficiency Retrofit Program, as well as legislative measures like House Bill 2 and House Bill 299, which promote high-performance building standards and energy-efficient HVAC equipment.

buildings could be added to CEMCS. Current state policy is to publicly disclose building performance for all buildings in the CEMCS as they are added to the system, and as the budget allows over time. Currently, 0% of buildings are benchma...

AI summary The text discusses building energy management in Kentucky, highlighting the Commonwealth Energy Management and Control System (CEMCS) and the lack of mandatory policies for fleet efficiency. It also mentions the use of Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) by state agencies.

state’s other utilities have also made substantial reductions in similar programs. Since then, statewide levels of electric savings have fallen to just a fraction of those reported in previous years. The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary Kentucky's energy efficiency programs have seen reduced savings in recent years. DSM programs are regulated by the KPSC, with cost recovery through tariff riders. The 2007 Energy Act and HB 240 increased oversight, requiring utilities to implement DSM programs and consider equity across customer classes. Natural gas programs are available for non-industrial sectors and administered by utilities with third-party contractors.

eneration from CHP (in terms of kWh production) that apply to all forms of CHP. Last Updated: July 2018 ","There are currently no state policies that provide additional incentives for CHP deployment. Last Updated: July 2018 ","In 2012 the...

AI summary Louisiana has no state-level incentives for CHP deployment, but House Resolution 167 encourages CHP in critical facilities. Energy efficiency programs, like Energy Smart by Entergy New Orleans, began in 2011, and the LPSC approved quick-start energy efficiency rules in 2013. Phase Two programs are being developed, with budgets and savings details available in State Spending and Savings Tables.

improvements, bicycle facilities, housing projects, and parking facilities within .25 (1/4) miles of a commuter rail station, subway station, bus station, bus rapid transit station, or ferry terminal. Pathways to Zero Net Energy Program: T...

AI summary The text outlines several energy efficiency and sustainability programs in Massachusetts, including the Pathways to Zero Net Energy Program, Leading by Example Grants, Municipal Energy Technical Assistance (META) Program, and Capturing Franchise Energy Savings (CaFES). These initiatives aim to promote energy efficiency, support zero net energy buildings, and provide technical assistance to municipalities and franchises.

ergy savings across their franchise stores located in Municipal Light Plant (MLP) territories. The focus of this effort will be quick service restaurants, gas stations, convenience stores, and others. Zero Energy Modular Affordable Housing...

AI summary The text outlines several energy efficiency and clean energy initiatives in Nova Scotia, including a focus on energy savings in MLP territories, the ZE-MAHI grant program for affordable housing, the LED street lighting accelerator, and the Community Clean Energy Resiliency Initiative. Additionally, the Affordable Access to Regional Coordination (AARC) Grant Program aims to expand knowledge of low-income energy efficiency programs.

cerning policies, practices, and specific actions that the Commonwealth should implement to ensure that the objectives of Executive Order 552 are accomplished. Goals and metrics for tracking progress In addition to its oversight role throu...

AI summary The document discusses the oversight role of MA DOER in tracking progress towards energy efficiency goals, including the development of outcomes for the Massachusetts Residential Conservation Services (RCS) program. It also outlines the formation of an inter-agency workgroup to assess cumulative environmental impacts on environmental justice populations as mandated by Chapter 8 of the Acts of 2021.

quantitative method by which cumulative impacts can be measured, such that state agencies may utilize this information in permitting, siting, grant disbursement, enforcement and other state functions. With respect to development of the 202...

AI summary The text discusses the need for quantitative methods to measure cumulative impacts for state agencies and outlines recommendations from the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) for the 2022-2024 Three Year Energy Efficiency Plan, including data collection on barriers and service equity.

he Green Jobs Academy is a Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Network Verified Weatherization Training Center and provides training approved by the Massachusetts Utilities Program Administrators. Building Operator Training. MassCEC is...

AI summary The Green Jobs Academy is a Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) training center in Massachusetts. DOER is piloting a Building Asset Rating (BAR) protocol and participating in HELIX to make home energy score data accessible. SB 2746 mandates home energy audit disclosure for home buyers.

tionally, the Green Communities Act (S.B. 2768) of 2008 mandates that new buildings owned or operated by the state must minimize their life-cycle costs by using energy efficiency and renewable energy. Since 2013, the Division of Capital As...

AI summary The Green Communities Act of 2008 requires state-owned or operated buildings to minimize life-cycle costs through energy efficiency and renewable energy. Since 2013, DCAMM has completed 82 energy projects across 35 million square feet, saving $14.8 million annually and reducing GHG emissions by 41,000 metric tons. The Commonwealth Energy Intelligence program has expanded to include 200 new meters and 7 million square feet of additional building area.

inistration and Finance houses the ESPC Program under its sub-Department of Capital and Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM). Massachusetts offers some model documents, including a model contract. Through the DCAMM-DOER Accelerated Ene...

AI summary Massachusetts utilizes Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) through the Department of Energy Resources (DOER) and the sub-Department of Capital and Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM). The DCAMM-DOER Accelerated Energy Program, initiated in 2012, has facilitated $470 million in energy investments across 58 million square feet of state buildings, aiming for a 25% energy reduction and significant greenhouse gas emission reductions. DOER also participates in the DOE Better Buildings Performance Contracting Accelerator, contributing $350 million for energy projects.

doption since 2015.Stretch code towns have slightly higher average compliance rates than do base code towns. Non-program has remained constant since 2015 at 88% despite an increase in code stringency. The residential study methodology esse...

AI summary The document discusses Massachusetts' energy efficiency programs, including the use of HERS ratings for compliance assessments, utility involvement in code compliance initiatives, and training efforts. It also outlines policies supporting CHP deployment, such as incentives and interconnection standards.

urce within the state's EERS, and an interconnection standard that applies to CHP. Five new CHP installations came online in 2018. ","Policy: Massachusetts Distributed Generation Interconnection Rules Description: Massachusetts’ investor-o...

AI summary Massachusetts has implemented policies and incentives to support Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems. These include interconnection rules, energy efficiency standards requiring prioritization of demand-side resources like CHP, and incentive programs offering financial support for CHP installations.

es a greater reward to systems that are sized and designed to achieve ideal performance and cost-effectiveness. Incentives range from $750/kW to $1,200/kW and cannot exceed 50% of total project costs. Net metering: In Massachusetts net met...

AI summary The text discusses net metering policies in Massachusetts, including historical expansions, current caps, and eligibility for combined heat and power (CHP) systems. Incentives for systems are also mentioned, ranging from $750/kW to $1,200/kW.

o provide energy efficiency programs during its restructuring of the industry in 1997. The natural gas utilities in the state have offered energy efficiency programs to customers since the late 1980s. In 2008, the governor signed Chapter 1...

AI summary The text discusses the evolution of energy efficiency programs in Massachusetts, starting with the restructuring of the industry in 1997 and the introduction of the Green Communities Act in 2008. The Act established requirements for utility energy efficiency plans and created the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC). In 2018, the state further advanced clean energy initiatives with the passage of Chapter 227, addressing climate and technological challenges.

24. The 2008 Green Communities Act requires that electric and gas utilities procure all cost-effective energy efficiency before more expensive supply resources, requiring a three-year planning cycle. In January 2019, the DPU approved the f...

AI summary The 2008 Green Communities Act mandates that electric and gas utilities procure cost-effective energy efficiency before more expensive supply resources. The 2019-2021 Mass Save plan set ambitious energy savings targets, and the 2022–24 plan emphasizes electrification, equity, and workforce development in response to climate legislation aiming for net-zero emissions by 2050. Specific GHG reduction goals were established for electric and natural gas programs.

d cumulative savings over the next decade. Last reviewed: April 2022 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: total resource cost Secondary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: none The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency prog...

AI summary Massachusetts evaluates energy efficiency programs using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test, guided by legislative mandates like the Green Communities Act of 2008 and regulatory orders such as DPU 8-50-A. The state's approach includes assessing both energy and non-energy benefits, including health and economic impacts, and uses an electronic Technical Reference Manual for evaluation methods.

ocess to develop a statewide energy efficiency database that would potentially include customer energy use data, but there is no regulation in place to date. Requirements for Provision of Energy Data To date, there is no regulation in plac...

AI summary The document discusses the lack of statewide regulation for energy data provision in Massachusetts, highlighting the availability of estimated annual aggregate sales data through MassSaveData.com and the presence of building disclosure ordinances in Boston and Cambridge. It also notes that 86% of electric and 71% of gas customers have access to Green Button data through voluntary utility participation.

gy Administration also offers an Offshore Wind Workforce Training program; the program made $3M in awards in FY20 and $656K in FY21. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","House Bill...

AI summary Maryland's energy efficiency initiatives include an Offshore Wind Workforce Training program, energy savings goals for State-owned buildings, and a High Performance Green Building Program requiring new buildings to meet specific green building standards. The state has 27 active energy performance contracts with significant annual savings and CO2 reduction benefits.

location, commodity, meter, or account. Facility details including area (in square feet), service address, build date, primary use, geographic coordinates, and weather station data are also captured. As a result of the executive order that...

AI summary Maryland's executive order mandates a 10% energy savings goal for state-owned buildings, with EUI calculations underway. Additionally, the Clean Cars Act of 2019 established a Zero Emissions Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Council to develop procurement practices that include lifecycle cost evaluations for ZEVs. Budgets for the State Fleet Electric Vehicle Program are allocated for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.

5 and a new energy efficiency goal of 2% of annual retail sales beginning from 2018 was established. Electricity savings generated from CHP systems are eligible to be counted toward the savings goals. CHP resource acquisition programs: Uti...

AI summary Maryland utilities are implementing CHP programs to meet energy efficiency goals set by the EmPOWER Maryland Efficiency Act of 2008. These programs offer financial incentives, such as $0.07/kWh for net electricity produced, to encourage the adoption of CHP systems by commercial and industrial customers.

roject costs, with a maximum of $75,000. CHP projects may also be eligible for other assistance through Maryland Energy Administration’s Lawton Loan Program or Maryland’s Clean Energy Capital program. Net metering: Maryland’s net-metering...

AI summary Maryland offers various incentives and policies to support CHP systems, including grants, loan programs, and net metering rules. The Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard requires utilities to meet increasing percentages of retail sales with renewable resources, and a CHP Grant Program provides specific funding for resiliency in critical infrastructure.

6 and through 2023, utilities must ramp up programs by 0.2% per year, leveling out at 2% incremental savings per year as a percent of 2016 weather-normalized gross retail sales and electricity losses. The EmPOWER Maryland Energy Efficiency...

AI summary Maryland's EmPOWER Act of 2008 set energy efficiency targets for utilities, requiring them to achieve 10% of a 15% per-capita electricity reduction goal by 2015. Utilities met the energy savings goal but fell short of the peak demand reduction target. Legislative goals were achieved by 2015, though the demand reduction goal was not fully met.

promoting urban redevelopment. In 2001, Maryland state general assembly dedicated $500 million to the upgrade of mass transit service and infrastructure. VMT Targets: No policy in place or proposed. Complete Streets: In 2005, Maryland impl...

AI summary Maryland has invested in mass transit and implemented policies like Complete Streets to promote pedestrian and cyclist access. The state submitted a freight plan with energy efficiency and emissions reduction targets. However, there are no state programs to incentivize low-income housing near transit or formal goals for equitable EV charging deployment.

r the operation of the Maryland Transit Administration in fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022 to be increased by at least 4.4% over the previous year, starting with the fiscal year 2019 budget (Source). Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","For fiscal...

AI summary The document outlines budget increases for the Maryland Transit Administration and discusses electric vehicle incentives and energy efficiency standards in Maryland. It mentions a $3,000 tax credit for qualifying vehicles and $1.2M in incentives for EV supply equipment. Additionally, it notes that most Maryland energy efficiency standards have been preempted by federal legislation, except for two products.

ng energy disclosure requirements and re-establishes the Residential and Commercial Building Energy Labeling Working Groups. As of May 2019, this bill had not yet been sent to the Governor for action. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","The 2016 S...

AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency and climate change initiatives in Vermont, including energy disclosure requirements, building energy labeling working groups, and goals to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from state government operations by specific percentages by set years.

Last Updated: August 2020 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: A gap analysis and energy code compliance plan was completed for Vermont and is available on the Vermont Department of Public Service website. Baseline & Updated Complia...

AI summary A gap analysis and energy code compliance plan for Vermont was completed and made available online. Compliance studies show 66% residential and 90% commercial compliance with energy codes. Efficiency Vermont and Burlington Electric Dept. provide training and support to improve compliance. The Department of Public Service plans to form a stakeholder advisory group, and Efficiency Vermont funds energy code training for various professionals.

System Planning Committee, with recommnedations from that committee to the Public Utilities Commission as to whether non-wires alternatives are eligilbe. CHP is an eligible project to be considered. Last Updated: July 2019 ","There are som...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency and combined heat and power (CHP) policies in Vermont, including tax exemptions and renewable energy standards. It also highlights Vermont's leadership in energy efficiency through the creation of an energy efficiency utility and the role of the PUC in setting budgets for energy efficiency programs.

law requires the Vermont Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to set budgets at a level that require the program administrators to realize ""all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency."" The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary The Vermont Public Utilities Commission (PUC) is required by law to set energy efficiency budgets that ensure the realization of all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency. Vermont established a statewide energy efficiency utility (EEU) model in 1999, with Efficiency Vermont (EVT) and Burlington Electric Department (BED) operating under this designation. Natural gas efficiency programs are also supported by legislation and regulation, beginning in 1993. Act 56 of 2015 introduced a Renewable Energy Standard, requiring electric utilities to reduce fossil fuel use through efficiency measures, starting in 2017.

2% of the utility's sales, rising to 10% by 2032. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: June 2020 ","Vermont sta...

AI summary Vermont requires utilities to prepare least cost integrated plans to meet energy needs at the lowest lifecycle cost, including energy efficiency programs. Energy Efficiency Utility budgets are set to realize all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency. Recent energy efficiency savings include 357,400 MWh of electricity and 192,599 Mcf of natural gas over 2018-2020.

incremental savings totaling 357,400 MWh over 2018-2020, or approximately 2.4% of annual sales. Natural gas - Three-year annual incremental savings of 192,599 Mcf spanning 2018-2020, or 0.5% of sales. Vermont does not have traditional EERS...

AI summary Vermont's energy efficiency programs focus on incremental savings in electricity and natural gas, with no traditional EERS legislation. Instead, the PUC sets budgets and goals every three years through a Demand Resource Plan proceeding, with compensation tied to performance. The EEU structure is reviewed every six years, and the administrator may be replaced if goals are not met.

support energy efficiency projects in their facilities. The ESA is run through the Efficiency Vermont program and related savings are reported and verified through the Savings Verification mechanism. For CCP, eligible customers must be ISO...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Vermont, including the Energy Savings Accounts (ESA) run through Efficiency Vermont and the Customer Credit Program (CCP) which requires ISO 14001 certification. It also mentions a pilot program allowing selected customers to direct funds from the electric EEC toward energy efficiency projects. VEIC is highlighted as the operator of most state programs and is eligible for performance incentives based on energy savings goals.

period January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, VEIC can earn up to $4,543,500 for meeting electric energy savings goals and other performance goals including peak savings, and total resource benefits. Vermont statute (30 VSA Sec. 218c) dire...

AI summary The text outlines Vermont's energy efficiency regulations, including statutory requirements for utilities to develop least-cost integrated plans and the decoupling mechanisms for IOUs. It also discusses Act 62 of 2019, which mandates the aggregation and release of energy usage data for multiunit buildings.

f 2019) included funding for 23 bicycle and pedestrian projects and $36.8 million in total for public transit operations and capital investments, including the purchase of four all-electric buses. Last Reviewed: June 2020 ","Financial ince...

AI summary Vermont has implemented various energy efficiency and transportation initiatives, including funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects, electric vehicle incentives, and the adoption of appliance efficiency standards. These efforts aim to promote sustainability and reduce energy consumption.

vels. Green Loan Loss Reserve: This program, offered by the Michigan Energy Office through a third-party contractor, guarantees loans for energy efficiency projects, primarily in multifamily housing. Community Energy Management Program: Th...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Michigan, including the Green Loan Loss Reserve and the Community Energy Management Program, as well as the MI Healthy Climate Plan and the Five Pillars for a Just Transition. It also mentions the 2008 Clean, Renewable, and Efficient Energy Act and the Low-Income Workgroup established by the Michigan Public Service Commission to address low-income energy needs.

ity providers, and community stakeholders every month to address low-income specific issues with the goal of enhancing available initiatives so they may better serve the needs of low-income customers. One of the five pillars of Michigan's...

AI summary The text discusses Michigan's efforts to address low-income energy needs through stakeholder engagement and the Pay it Forward pillar of the Just Transition plan, which focuses on creating clean energy jobs and workforce development. It also mentions Public Act 295, which aims to reduce state government energy purchases by 25% by 2015 through energy efficiency measures and the use of LEED standards.

ic, mandatory requirement for increasing state fleet efficiency. State alternative-fuel vehicle procurement requirements that give a voluntary option to count efficient vehicles are thus not included. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","PA 625 was...

AI summary PA 625, enacted in 2012, promotes energy savings performance contracts in Michigan by designating the Department of Technology, Management and Budget as the lead agency. It requires the assembly of qualified energy service providers and the development of standardized contracts and documents. The legislation also allows for fees and outlines cost-savings measures, with municipalities receiving technical assistance for energy efficiency projects.

ainties in how the pandemic would affect tax revenue led to statewide budget freezes. With no funding to support trainings or resource development there was no action taken on code education in 2020. Last reviewed: July 2021 ",,"The state...

AI summary Due to uncertainties in pandemic-related tax revenue, Michigan implemented budget freezes, halting code education efforts in 2020. The state has an interconnection standard for CHP systems, which are eligible under the renewable energy standard, but there are no state policies to acquire energy savings or provide incentives for CHP deployment.

significantly above the statutory minimum (link). The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: August 2020 ","Legislati...

AI summary Public Act 295, passed in 2008, reestablished utility energy efficiency programs in Michigan. The MPSC must ensure that proposed plans meet the utility system resource cost test and are reasonable and prudent. Recent IRPs have set higher savings targets for utilities. Utilities must offer energy efficiency programs across all customer sectors, and large customers may be exempt from surcharges if approved.

lity financial incentives under PA 342 have spurred utilities to pursue upwards of 1.5% annual electric savings. And recent IRPs approved for Consumers and DTE call for 2% savings for 2021 and beyond. Michigan adopted an EERS in October 20...

AI summary Michigan's EERS, established by the Clean, Renewable, and Efficient Energy Act, requires utilities to achieve annual energy savings targets. These targets have been maintained and extended by PA 342, which also removed a spending cap and introduced credit banking rules for energy waste reduction.

ove their operational practices, including Reduced Fleet Fossil Fuel Consumption that specifies a 30% reduction of State Fleet consumption of fossil fuels by 2027 relative to a 2017 adjusted baseline. Last Updated: October 2020 ","In 2011,...

AI summary The state established the Guaranteed Energy Savings Program (GESP) in 2011 to provide technical, contractual, and financial assistance for energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements. GESP requires state facilities to use its pre-qualified contractors and model contracts, while municipalities and schools are not required but can benefit from technical assistance.

jects implemented by state facilities must use the Guaranteed Energy Savings Program. Municipals and schools are not required to use GESP, but if they do, they receive Commerce’s technical assistance. In April 2019, Governor Walz issued Ex...

AI summary Governor Walz's Executive Order 19-25 mandates state agencies to reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency and renewable energy strategies. It also requires the use of the Guaranteed Energy Savings Program (GESP) for state facilities and encourages the adoption of energy-saving performance contracting with technical assistance provided by Commerce.

ormance contacting; and for Commerce to offer technical assistance for state agencies and local government and school districts that elect to implement energy-saving and renewable energy improvements. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","To help ac...

AI summary The Next Generation Energy Act of 2007 established the CARD Grant Program to fund energy-saving and renewable energy research through utility assessments. The program has a $3.6 million annual budget and has funded over $25.5 million in R&D projects. The Center for Energy and Environment and the Center for Sustainable Building Research at the University of Minnesota are highlighted for their work in energy efficiency and environmental impact research.

Last Updated: July 2021 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: Minnesota completed a gap analysis in October 2014 with the Building Code Assistance Project. Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Completed in 2018, the Minnesota Cente...

AI summary Minnesota has completed several studies and initiatives related to energy code compliance, including a gap analysis, baseline studies, and training programs. A collaborative effort involving utilities, stakeholders, and organizations is working on a C&S Roadmap to support energy efficiency and utility participation in code-related activities.

cedures applicable to all investor-owned utilities, apply to systems up to 10 MW in size, and include CHP systems. Several aspects of the review process are different depending on the size of system. Last Updated: July 2018 ","CHP in energ...

AI summary The text discusses policies related to combined heat and power (CHP) systems in Minnesota, including the Next Generation Energy Act (NGEA) and modifications to energy conservation improvement definitions. It also covers net metering laws and supportive policies for renewable-fueled CHP, including a CHP Action Plan developed with stakeholder input.

entation of CHP in the state. In 2016, the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) published a case study documenting Minnesota's experience that can serve as a model for other states. Last Updated: July 2018 ",13 out of 20,...

AI summary Minnesota has a long history of energy efficiency programs, supported by legislation like the Next Generation Energy Act and the Energy Conservation and Optimization Act. These programs have achieved significant savings and are integrated into the state's regulatory framework, including performance incentives and integrated resource plans filed with the Public Utilities Commission.

c Utilities Commission. The plans identify the potential resources the utilities intend to use to meet consumer needs in future years, including significant energy efficiency and conservation savings. The most recent budgets for energy eff...

AI summary Minnesota's utilities are required to invest in energy efficiency and conservation through the Conservation Improvement Program and file integrated resource plans with the Public Utilities Commission. These plans identify resources to meet consumer needs and include energy efficiency savings. The most recent budgets for these programs are available in the State Spending and Savings Tables.

ies Commission. The plans identify the potential resources the utilities intend to use to meet consumer needs in future years. The plans include significant energy efficiency and conservation savings. On May 19, 2010, the Minnesota 2009 En...

AI summary The Minnesota 2009 Energy Policy Act and subsequent legislation, such as H.F. 729, established energy efficiency as a preferred resource and mandated minimum annual savings goals for utilities. The 2007 Next Generation Energy Act (NGEA) introduced the state’s first Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program (EERS), setting 1.5% annual savings targets for electricity and natural gas, with exemptions for small utilities and large customers.

o exempt small utilities under a certain customer threshold. About 13% of electric load and gas sales are also exempt from efficiency programs due to the state’s opt-out provision for large customers. In 2021, the state enacted the Energy...

AI summary The 2021 Energy Conservation and Optimization (ECO) Act strengthened the state's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Standards (EERS), increasing utility savings targets and expanding the scope of energy-saving measures. It also introduced load management and fuel-switching incentives to promote beneficial electrification and energy efficiency.

data. Each utility shall file its aggregation and release policies with the Commission within 30 days of the order or 30 days prior to implementation. See the 2017 order in Docket E,G 999/CI-12-1344. While utilities are not required to pro...

AI summary Minnesota does not require utilities to provide energy use data to multi-tenant building owners or public agencies. While there is no standardized system for requesting aggregated energy use data, rate-regulated utilities must use an approved data release consent form for individual meter data. Minnesota has adopted complete streets legislation and is pursuing rulemaking to adopt California's low- and zero-emission vehicle standards.

alls for a State Energy Management Advisory Board comprised of selected agencies and led by the ENRD to meet at least once a year in order to review implementation of the State Energy Management Plan. Mississippi Senate Bill 3007 requires...

AI summary Mississippi Senate Bill 3007 mandates energy efficiency measures for state-funded construction and renovations. The state also requires its fleet to meet specific fuel economy standards and encourages the use of alternative fuels. Public entities can engage in Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) with pre-qualified ESCOs to achieve energy savings and capital improvements.

tinely engages in informational and technical assistance campaigns to increase the utilization of ESPCs as a means to acheive energy savings and capital improvement for Mississippi's public entities. Last Updated: July 2020 ","The Energy I...

AI summary Mississippi engages in energy efficiency initiatives through the Energy Institute at Mississippi State University, which focuses on combined heating and power, energy audits, and biomass technologies. The state has a voluntary residential energy code and updated commercial codes to ASHRAE 90.1-2010, with opportunities for jurisdictions to adopt stricter standards. Additionally, the Smart Business Act provides rebates for corporations collaborating with state universities on energy-related research.

de for commercial and state-owned buildings. These codes training sessions complement the work of MDA by leveraging a network of officials to educate and implement the building energy code standard. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ",,"The st...

AI summary The text discusses the lack of state policies in Mississippi to encourage CHP deployment and the absence of interconnection standards for CHP systems. It also mentions the Mississippi Public Service Commission's energy efficiency rules implemented in 2013, which require investor-owned utilities to implement energy efficiency programs.

ned utilities to implement “Quick Start” energy efficiency programs. The rule also laid out criteria for program cost-benefit tests, cost recovery, and evaluation, monitoring, and verification (EM&V). The PSC issued revised energy efficien...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of energy efficiency programs, including 'Quick Start' initiatives and Demand Side Management (DSM) portfolios, mandated by regulatory bodies such as the Public Service Commission. These programs aim to achieve cost-effective energy savings and include criteria for cost recovery and evaluation. The most recent budgets and savings data are available in State Spending and Savings Tables.

ng Practices (DSESP), a resource of the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP). Last Updated: August 2019 ","Requirements for State and Utility Support of Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs No specific required spending or savings...

AI summary The text discusses Mississippi's energy efficiency policies, including the absence of specific cost-effectiveness rules for low-income programs, the lack of self-direct or opt-out programs, and the integration of energy efficiency into an updated Integrated Resource Planning and Reporting rule. It also notes the absence of policies to release energy use data and transportation-related policies.

l, regardless of cost-effectiveness, of energy savings from low-income demand-side programs. Energy savings from multi-family buildings that house low-income households may count toward this target."" DE anticipates the inclusion of clean...

AI summary The document discusses DE's initiatives to support low-income demand-side programs, workforce development in clean energy, and energy efficiency in public and agricultural sectors. It highlights efforts such as grant programs, energy audits, and low-interest loans to reduce energy costs and support workforce training.

marked in Portfolio Manager by the Missouri Division of Energy in partnership with OA-FMDC, which represents approximately 50 percent of square footage managed by OA and the Department of Corrections. All Missouri Housing Development Commi...

AI summary The document outlines Missouri's requirements for low-income housing developments and fuel conservation for state vehicles. It specifies compliance with local or national building codes and the use of green building techniques. Additionally, it details the need for state agencies to develop energy conservation plans to reduce fuel consumption and increase the use of alternative fuels.

ry groups meet separately at least quarterly. Training/Outreach: The Division of Energy has developed a resource page dedicated to building codes compliance training with assistance from MEEA: Link. Last reviewed: July 2021 ",,"Missouri pr...

AI summary Missouri promotes combined heat and power (CHP) for critical infrastructure and renewable-fueled CHP under its renewable energy standard. The Division of Energy (DE) has implemented various initiatives, including training, outreach, and participation in CHP partnerships. Net metering and interconnection standards are also in place for small-scale systems.

as a result of cogeneration, outreach by Liberty Utilities’ local gas distribution company, and the inclusion of CHP as a business custom measure in Ameren Missouri’s upcoming cycle of MEEIA programs. Missouri voters approved the state’s R...

AI summary The text discusses the promotion of combined heat and power (CHP) in Missouri through various initiatives, including the Renewable Energy Standard (RES) law, the Energy Loan Program, and the Missouri Comprehensive State Energy Plan. CHP is recognized as an eligible technology under the RES and receives incentives such as a 1.25 multiplier for in-state renewable fuels.

rogram, which calls for all eligible participants to be provided with the past 12 months of energy usage and technical assistance to enable benchmarking buildings using ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager. Building on Ameren Missouri's support...

AI summary The text discusses initiatives related to building energy benchmarking, including the provision of past energy usage data and technical assistance to enable benchmarking using ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager. It also outlines a two-stage project by Ameren Missouri and mentions regulatory requirements for multi-tenant buildings by KCP&L.

local marginalized groups. The state does not currently include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","In April 200...

AI summary The state has implemented energy efficiency standards for state-owned buildings, requiring them to exceed the Energy Conservation Code by 20% where cost-effective. The State Building Energy Conservation Program tracks energy performance and provides benchmarking data publicly. However, there is no specific policy for clean energy workforce development or a disclosure policy in place.

with marginalized groups in the community for the creation or implementation of its energy, sustainability, or climate action plan. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2017 ","In 2010, SB73...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency and sustainability policies, including data collection mandates and high-performance design standards for state buildings. It references legislation such as SB73 and New Hampshire law (RSA 155-A:13), and mentions the development of energy conservation plans and annual energy reports.

source within its EERS and renewable energy standard, but otherwise has limited policies to encourage CHP. No new CHP systems were installed in 2018. ","Policy: New Hampshire Interconnections Standard Description: The New Hampshire Public...

AI summary The document discusses policies related to combined heat and power (CHP) in New Hampshire, including its eligibility under energy efficiency programs and access to financing through the Clean Energy Fund. CHP systems are designated as eligible measures under various programs, and interconnection rules for net-metered systems up to 1 MW are outlined.

old to end-use customers be supplied by renewable energy or an equivalent (via trading) by 2025. Resources are separated into four tiers, and new renewable-powered CHP would likely fall within Tier 1. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ",10 out of 2...

AI summary New Hampshire's regulated electric utilities offer energy efficiency programs under NHSaves, funded by a system benefits charge and RGGI. Natural gas efficiency programs are separately administered and funded via the LDAC. An EERS was established in 2016 with savings targets for 2020.

of electric sales and 2.25% of gas sales by 2020. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","New Hampshi...

AI summary New Hampshire restructured its electric utility markets and supports energy efficiency programs. The PUC approved core energy efficiency programs in 2002, leading to the NHSaves program. Funding comes from a system benefits charge and a local distribution adjustment clause for gas programs.

ach electric utility (except for NHEC) proposed an additional system benefit charge component to recover lost base revenues. Natural gas programs are funded by a Local Distribution Adjustment Clause. Additional funding for New Hampshire’s...

AI summary New Hampshire's energy efficiency programs are funded through mechanisms like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and the Local Distribution Adjustment Clause. The state's Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) mandates increased savings targets, with corresponding increases in funding from ISO-NE's forward capacity market (FCM). Savings targets are projected to increase from 0.8% in 2018 to 1.3% in 2020 for electricity and from 0.7% to 0.8% for natural gas.

pation and energy savings among potential participants that tend to have large, complex facilities. Since 2008, the Clean Energy Division has done nearly 1500 audits and benchmarks across all sectors. New Jersey leads by example with an in...

AI summary New Jersey's Clean Energy Division has conducted over 1500 energy audits since 2008. The state is leading by example with the Energy Savings Improvement Programs (ESIP) aimed at improving energy efficiency in state facilities and contributing to a 20% reduction in energy usage by 2020. The FY20 budget includes increased funding for these initiatives, managed through the BPU and the Energy Capital Committee.

isting of members from Treasury and the BPU Division of State Energy Services coordinates and recommends approval of these projects based on evaluation of capital costs and anticipated energy savings. The list of planned projects includes...

AI summary The State Facilities Initiative involves planned energy efficiency projects coordinated by Treasury and the BPU Division of State Energy Services, with budgets increasing from $100,000 in FY18 to $10 million in FY20, including carryover funds and a true-up from FY19. Agencies are encouraged to use the New Jersey Clean Energy Program’s Local Government Energy Audit program, which covers audit costs fully.

tionally, state agencies are encouraged to utilize the New Jersey Clean Energy Program’s Local Government Energy Audit program which provides 100% of the costs of audits to local and state facilities. The New Jersey Board of Public Utiliti...

AI summary New Jersey state agencies are encouraged to use the NJ Clean Energy Program's Local Government Energy Audit program, which provides free energy audits and benchmarking for public facilities. The Office of State Energy Facilities, established by the NJ Board of Public Utilities, promotes energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives, supported by a $100 million line of credit for state projects.

and usage and identify outlying state facilities that need energy efficiency upgrades. The Division of State Energy Services has started to develop a plan forward to tackle these largest energy users. The New Jersey Department of Community...

AI summary The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs and Rutgers Center for Green Buildings have developed resources to promote energy efficiency in buildings and municipalities. State fleets and certain businesses are regulated under the 1992 Energy Policy Act to increase energy efficiency and use alternative fuels.

nt interdisciplinary center for green building excellence in the Northeast, while serving as a single accessible locus for fostering collaboration among green building practitioners and policy-makers. The proposed FY2020 budget also includ...

AI summary The FY2020 budget includes funding for energy efficiency and clean energy initiatives, such as a Research and Development Energy Tech hub, innovation in clean energy, and incentives for smart technology devices. The BPU will also initiate a proceeding on energy storage to address peak demand. The document outlines building code compliance requirements for residential and commercial structures in New Jersey.

y Group: The Uniform Construction Code Act establishes a Uniform Construction Code Advisory Board. And under the Uniform Construction Code Advisory Board, there is a mechanical/energy subcode committee which includes code officials, engine...

AI summary New Jersey incorporates combined heat and power (CHP) into its energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) with specific goals and excludes natural gas used for CHP from gas savings targets. The state offers training, continuing education, and incentives for CHP projects, including a $29 million budget for CHP incentives in FY 2018.

opted a budget of $29 million in FY 2018 for CHP incentives. Last Updated: August 2019 ","Incentives, grants, or financing: New Jersey provides incentives for CHP deployment through several programs. New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program (NJCE...

AI summary New Jersey supports combined heat and power (CHP) deployment through various programs and policies, including financial incentives, tax exemptions, and changes to property definitions. The Clean Energy Program (NJCEP) offers incentives based on system type and efficiency, with bonus incentives for systems with blackstart capabilities. The Cogeneration Tax Exemption provides tax relief for natural gas used in on-site generation, and the state has updated definitions to support CHP integration with district energy systems.

s, within five years of implementation of their energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs, and until such time as all cost-effective energy efficiency is achieved in each utility territory. The Board of Public Utilities has adop...

AI summary The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) has set energy efficiency and peak demand reduction targets for utilities, based on the 2019 market potential study. The program includes triennial reviews, cost recovery mechanisms, and performance incentives. Evaluation is conducted annually by a third party, Rutgers University CEEEP, to ensure independence.

award has a goal to realize 20% energy savings by the year 2020 in the General Services Department building inventory through the WISE (Whole-building Investments for Sustainable Efficiency) program. SB 200 of 2010 established a wider buil...

AI summary New Mexico aims to achieve 20% energy savings in state buildings by 2020 through the WISE program. SB 200 of 2010 mandates Energy Star certification for new and renovated buildings over 3,000 square feet. The Energy Conservation and Management Division (ECMD) supports energy audits and tracks energy use with Portfolio Manager. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham issued Executive Order 2019-03 to develop a climate strategy and adopt new building codes.

ding of natural gas vehicle infrastructure and adoption of natural gas vehicles. The state will also be developing an outline for a pilot project that highlights how CNG can be utilized in New Mexico. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The Energy...

AI summary The document discusses New Mexico's efforts in developing natural gas vehicle infrastructure and adoption, as well as the Energy, Conservation, and Management Division's (ECMD) role in Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC), including the implementation of $280.4 million in contracts that have saved 127.47 million kWh and $12.6 million in guaranteed utility savings.

in the facilities. In addition, measurement and verification reports are required to be reported to the NM Energy Conservation and Management Division every January to confirm the guaranteed savings. ECMD has processed $49.5 million in ene...

AI summary New Mexico has implemented energy performance contracting through agreements with seven ESCOs, supporting $49.5 million in projects across 200 buildings. These efforts are part of a partnership with the DOE and align with House Memorial 61, which calls for a study on energy performance contracting and related initiatives. A task force was formed to evaluate ways to expand and improve these programs.

energy projects may also be eligible for an Advanced Energy Tax Credit. The state energy office also partners with USDOE support services to address any needs from any entity that requests assistance. New Mexico has used the DOE CHP Techni...

AI summary New Mexico has three investor-owned electric utilities and three natural gas utilities, which are required by the 2005 Efficient Use of Energy Act to invest in energy efficiency and load management. They recover program costs through a tariff rider with annual reconciliation. The state energy office collaborates with USDOE and other organizations to support energy projects and workshops on combined heat and power and waste reduction in the oil and gas industry.

tariff rider with an annual reconciliation mechanism. These four utilities offer a variety of energy efficiency programs, including programs targeted at low-income customers and multi-family housing. Electric IOUs have a statutory goal of...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency (EE) programs and statutory goals for utilities in New Mexico. Electric IOUs have a statutory goal of achieving 8% energy savings by 2020, updated to 5% savings relative to 2020 sales between 2021-2025. Rural electric cooperatives are required to examine cost-effective programs, though they are not mandated to implement them. The Efficient Use of Energy Act (EUEA) of 2005 set these goals and requires utilities to evaluate and implement cost-effective EE and load management programs.

exico’s utilities, and representatives of the Public Regulation Commission, and preserved the targets but reduced the energy savings requirement in 2020 for electric utilities from 10% to 8% of sales. In early 2019, the New Mexico legislat...

AI summary New Mexico passed HB 291 in 2019, which sets energy efficiency program requirements for utilities, reduces the energy savings target for electric utilities from 10% to 8% in 2020, and mandates the development of energy savings targets for 2026–2030. Distribution cooperatives must self-impose electricity reduction targets and report annually to the PRC. Energy efficiency programs are subject to cost-effectiveness testing and independent evaluation for measurement and verification.

year the two programs with the highest projected energy savings are evaluated. The Commission has oversight in selecting the independent program evaluator and uses an RFP process for this purpose. According to the Database of State Efficie...

AI summary The text discusses New Mexico's energy efficiency programs, focusing on the evaluation of programs with the highest projected energy savings, the use of the Utility Cost Test (UCT) for decision-making, and legislative requirements for low-income energy efficiency programs, including targets and funding mandates.

y 2025. Furthermore, Sections 7.2 and 7.3 of the CLCPA direct State agencies and authorities to incorporate emissions reduction goals into decisions on permits, licenses, grants, loans, and contracts. Following the issuance of the EO166 gu...

AI summary The text outlines New York's climate and energy policies under the CLCPA, emphasizing emissions reduction goals and energy efficiency measures. Key requirements include the development of Energy Master Plans, LED lighting replacement by 2025, and benchmarking policies. These initiatives aim to reduce energy use across state agencies and authorities.

g grid outages. Bonus incentives may be available for CHP projects serving critical infrastructure. Also, New York customers using natural gas for CHP may be eligible for discounted natural gas rates. The state also has a decade-plus of ef...

AI summary New York encourages renewable-fueled combined heat and power (CHP) systems through its Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and Clean Energy Fund. Energy efficiency programs are supported by a non-bypassable system benefits charge (SBC) on utility bills. These programs cover residential, multifamily, low-income, and commercial/industrial customers, and are managed by the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) and public power authorities.

ssion, two public power authorities not under the Commission’s jurisdiction, the New York Power Authority and the Long Island Power Authority, also offer energy efficiency programs to their customers. New York set a statewide 2025 target o...

AI summary New York State has set a 2025 target of 185 Tbtu in energy savings, with specific sub-targets for electricity and natural gas savings. The Public Service Commission (PSC) has established incremental annual energy savings targets for utilities, tripling efficiency savings goals since 2019. The State Energy Planning Board uses program evaluations to develop 20-year energy demand forecasts and assessments.

efficiency programs—a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in the NYS Register on April 15, 2015. A new case, 15-M-0252, was established for the utilities post-2015 energy efficiency programs. In January 2016, the PSC authorized NYS...

AI summary This text outlines the development of energy efficiency programs in New York, including the establishment of a Clean Energy Fund, the transition from surcharge-based funding to rate-based recovery, and the setting of energy efficiency targets and strategies. Key events include the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in 2015 and the issuance of a white paper in 2018.

al site energy savings for 2015-2025, relative to forecasted site energy consumption in 2025. The white paper also provided a number of strategies the state could pursue in order to achieve the goal. In December 2018, the PSC approved new...

AI summary The PSC approved increased energy efficiency targets for investor-owned utilities in 2018, including a 3% annual reduction in electricity sales by 2025 and a minimum 5 TBtu subtarget for heat pump savings. In 2020, the PSC authorized incremental utility-specific budgets and savings targets for electric, gas, and heat pump portfolios, aiming for 3.0% EE savings as a percentage of sales for electric and 1.3% for gas by 2025.

3% for gas in 2025. Last Updated: August 2020 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: societal cost test Secondary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: utility cost test, ratepayer impact measure Both utilities and the New York State Ener...

AI summary The text outlines the cost-effectiveness tests used in New York for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including the societal cost test and utility cost test. It mentions the use of a technical reference manual and guidance from NYSERDA and the Public Service Commission for program evaluations. The societal cost test includes environmental and non-energy benefits.

roviding additional demand-side management resources. PSC-authorized orders in December 2018 and January 2020 established annual utility-specific LMI program budgets and savings targets through 2025. In December 2018, the PSC ordered the d...

AI summary The PSC has established LMI program budgets and savings targets through 2025, requiring a minimum of 20% of additional energy efficiency investments to go to low-income markets. Cost-effectiveness rules for these programs consider specific low-income benefits, and the LMI portion of the portfolio may be assessed separately from the overall BCA.

elines to be filed by August 3, 2015. The order also required electric utilities to implement a self-direct program in accordance with the Self-Direct Program Guidelines no later than January 1, 2017. The Self-Direct Program is available t...

AI summary The Self-Direct Program is available to large energy users with specific demand thresholds and requires adherence to funding and savings commitments. The Commission allowed utilities to decide whether to continue offering the program due to low enrollment. Additionally, utilities must implement decoupling mechanisms and energy efficiency incentives as mandated by past orders.

ain registration and renewal fees to fund public transit. It also created the MTA (Metropolitan Transportation Authority) Financial Assistance fund to support New York City area subway, bus and rail. In April 2019, the New York State Legis...

AI summary The text discusses New York State's initiatives to fund public transit through registration and renewal fees and the MTA Financial Assistance fund. It also outlines the Congestion Pricing Plan, which aims to reduce congestion and emissions while generating revenue for transit systems. Additionally, it mentions rebate programs such as the Drive Clean Rebate and the New York Truck Voucher Incentive Program to promote the adoption of zero-emission vehicles and cleaner transportation options.

ergy workforce. Various state agencies, college/universities and non-profits are taking actions identified in these recommendations. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Senate Bill...

AI summary North Carolina has implemented energy efficiency requirements for state-owned buildings, including exceeding ASHRAE 90.1-2004 standards and reducing energy consumption by specific percentages. The Utility Savings Initiative (USI) manages energy efficiency efforts, though funding was scaled back in 2017. The state also participates in the Better Buildings Challenge with a goal of reducing energy consumption by 20% by 2020.

he entire existing building stock, which included all agency and UNC buildings, was committed to the challenge, which sets a goal of reducing energy consumption by 20% by 2020 from a 2008-09 baseline. In October 2018, Governor Cooper signe...

AI summary North Carolina has committed to energy reduction goals, including a 20% reduction in energy consumption by 2020 and a 40% reduction in BTUs/Sqft by 2025. Governor Cooper's Executive Order 80 includes targets for energy efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions, and electric vehicle purchases. The state also has a Petroleum Displacement Plan requiring a reduction in petroleum use and alternative fuel vehicle acquisition requirements.

system is an energy efficiency measure. As of June 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas both offer incentives for CHP as a part of their non-residential energy efficiency programs. Last Updated: September 2018 ","Incentives...

AI summary The text discusses incentives and policies supporting combined heat and power (CHP) in North Carolina, including tax credits and the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS). It notes that Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas offer incentives for CHP as part of their energy efficiency programs.

tate’s RPS, which is a part of the Energy Portfolio Standard (EPS) encourages the use of opportunity fuels that may be used to power CHP, which can meet up to 25% of the RPS requirements through 2018. Last Updated: July 2018 ",3 out of 20,...

AI summary North Carolina's Energy Portfolio Standard (EPS) includes a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) that encourages the use of opportunity fuels for Combined Heat and Power (CHP), which can contribute up to 25% of RPS requirements through 2018. Energy efficiency programs have expanded, but investment and performance remain below the national average. The NCUC implemented REPS in 2008, setting energy efficiency targets that increased from 0.75% to 5% of prior-year sales by 2021.

creation of low-income housing near transit facilities, nor does it consider the proximity of transit facilities when distributing federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits to qualifying property owners. Last Reviewed: July 2021 ","In 2009 No...

AI summary The text discusses the absence of specific policies in North Carolina and North Dakota related to low-income housing near transit facilities, appliance standards, energy efficiency grants, and equity-related metrics in energy plans. It also notes the lack of research centers focused on energy efficiency in North Dakota.

nsure access for underserved customers or if they include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: September 2020 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2017 ","Though North D...

AI summary The text discusses the absence of a disclosure policy in North Dakota, the existence of public building efficiency programs, and the lack of specific policies for state fleet efficiency. It also notes the legal framework enabling energy savings contracts and the absence of public research centers focused on energy efficiency.

te. There is no statewide limit on aggregate net-metered capacity. These rules apply to CHP systems. Last Updated: July 2017 ","There are currently no additional supportive policies to encourage CHP. Last Updated: July 2017 ",0 out of 20,"...

AI summary North Dakota does not have statewide policies to encourage combined heat and power (CHP) systems or treat energy efficiency as a resource. Utilities are required to use least-cost planning, including demand-side management (DSM), but efficiency programs are limited and underfunded compared to the national average. There are no formally approved ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs in the state.

including energy conservation requirements. Last reviewed: August 2020 ","Ohio's commercial energy code is mandatory statewide and references both the 2012 IECC and 2010 ASHRAE 90.1 with amendments. Amendments were made to both the commerc...

AI summary Ohio's energy codes are mandatory statewide and reference the 2012 IECC and 2010 ASHRAE 90.1 with amendments. Local jurisdictions cannot adopt conflicting codes. A gap analysis and compliance studies have been conducted, and utilities provide voluntary support for training. Ohio also has an interconnection standard and incentive program for CHP systems.

that provides up to $500,000 for CHP projects with generating capacities less than 500 kW (not to exceed 50% of the project cost) The rebates include $0.08 per kWh generated and $100 per kW capacity. Last Updated: September 2018 ","Incenti...

AI summary Ohio provides financial incentives for CHP projects, including rebates and tax exemptions, but energy efficiency programs have faced legislative challenges, including the elimination of most programs by HB 6 in 2019. Technical assistance is available in certain areas.

electric energy customers. Most recently, HB 6, a nuclear subsidy bill passed in 2019, dealt a disastrous and lethal blow to energy efficiency in the state, effectively eliminating most all programs. The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary HB 6, a nuclear subsidy bill passed in 2019, eliminated most energy efficiency programs in Ohio by cutting surcharges on customer bills. PUCO ruled in February 2020 that energy efficiency programs would wind down and terminate by December 31, 2020, as per HB 6. Financing options like the Advanced Energy Fund and the Ohio Energy Loan Fund provide support for energy efficiency initiatives.

nt their savings collectively. Given the bill prohibits PUCO from approving a cost recovery mechanism after the 17.5% target is reached, programs are scheduled to be discontinued at the close of 2020. Before it's dismantling under HB 6, Oh...

AI summary The text discusses Ohio’s Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS) under Senate Bill 221, which included an Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS) and required utilities to achieve cumulative energy savings targets. The law was scheduled to be discontinued at the end of 2020 due to a prohibition on cost recovery mechanisms after reaching the 17.5% target. The primary and secondary cost-effectiveness tests used were the total resource cost test and the utility cost test.

k or evaluate how any energy, sustainability, or climate action initiatives being taken are affecting local marginalized groups. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2018 ","In 2008, the Gov...

AI summary The text discusses Oklahoma's energy efficiency policies, including the Conserving Oklahoma Act, the Oklahoma First Energy Plan, and the State Facilities Energy Conservation Program. These initiatives require state-owned buildings to meet LEED standards, set energy savings targets, and use the ENERGYSTAR Portfolio Manager tool for benchmarking. However, no disclosure policy or fleet efficiency requirements are in place.

n communities expressed interest in local ordinances for home and commercial scoring as part of their Climate Action Plans. These communities are moving through the process to create scoring programs. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","The mandat...

AI summary Communities are developing local ordinances for home and commercial energy scoring as part of their Climate Action Plans. Oregon's State Energy Efficiency Design Program (SEED) requires state facilities built after 2001 to exceed energy conservation standards by 20%, with 21 agencies using Energy Star Portfolio Manager for reporting. The Oregon Department of Energy (ODOE) uses this data for benchmarking and identifying energy efficiency opportunities.

Last reviewed: July 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Commercial: On October 16, 2019 Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) completed the Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies (Report #E19-392) for 2019 Oregon New Comme...

AI summary The document discusses compliance studies for Oregon's commercial and residential energy codes, highlighting high compliance rates and minimal deviations from code requirements. It also outlines utility involvement in promoting energy efficiency through training, incentives, and market transformation efforts.

wable energy and energy efficiency projects undertaken by utilities in the state. Energy savings generated by all types of CHP are eligible to contribute toward Energy Trust's long-term savings goals. Last Updated: July 2018 ","Incentives,...

AI summary Oregon supports combined heat and power (CHP) systems through incentives, grants, and technical assistance. Energy Trust of Oregon provides incentives for fossil fuel and renewable-fueled CHP systems, while the Department of Energy offers technical assistance and tax incentives. Renewable-fueled CHP systems are eligible under the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard, which requires 25% of electricity to come from renewable resources by 2025.

g efforts. ODOE hosted a workshop in 2016 that focused on resiliency and CHP systems entitled ""Northwest Combined Heat and Power: Improving Efficiency and Resilience in Energy Intensive Businesses."" Last Updated: July 2018 ",11 out of 20...

AI summary Oregon has been a leader in energy efficiency since the 1980s, with programs like the 1981 Residential Energy Conservation Act and the 1999 SB 1149 restructuring law. The Energy Trust of Oregon (ETO) administers energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and has set energy savings goals for multiple periods.

energy savings goals for the years 2015 through 2019 of 240 average megawatts (2,102 GWh) and 24 million annual therms of natural gas. These goals include savings from market transformation programs. NW Natural and Cascade Natural Gas adop...

AI summary Oregon has set energy savings goals from 2015 to 2019, including 2,102 GWh of electricity and 24 million therms of natural gas. NW Natural, Cascade Natural Gas, and Avista Utilities use various funding mechanisms for their programs. The Energy Trust of Oregon (ETO) administers most natural gas energy efficiency programs and has been successful since its creation in 2002.

ed significant success in a short time. Since its creation in 2002, the organization has rapidly developed and implemented a comprehensive menu of programs and services for customer energy efficiency. Oregon's public purpose charge (3% of...

AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon (ETO) has achieved significant success in implementing energy efficiency programs since its creation in 2002. Oregon's public purpose charge funds ETO's programs, as well as low-income initiatives. Self-direct options allow large customers to achieve energy savings with financial incentives and penalties based on performance.

s: Improving Large Customer Self-Direct Programs. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Oregon is p...

AI summary Oregon's energy efficiency programs are managed by the Energy Trust of Oregon, which works with investor-owned utilities to achieve cost-effective energy savings. SB 1157 (2016) mandates that electric utilities pursue all cost-effective energy efficiency. Incremental targets for 2020–2021 are ~1.3% for electricity and ~0.5% for natural gas.

ting use-per-customer decoupling since 2003. Both make a base rate decoupling adjustment to reflect changes in use per customer over the past year on a prospective basis in the following year’s rates. Cascade Natural Gas Docket No. UG 167,...

AI summary The text discusses decoupling mechanisms in utility rate structures, referencing past regulatory orders and current practices in energy efficiency programs. It also highlights data sharing requirements and platforms like Green Button used by utilities for customer energy use data.

a through Schedule 320 for large commercial and industrial customers. Pacific Power has historically made interval meter data available through Schedule 271. They called this service Energy Profiler. The only third party that regularly rec...

AI summary The document discusses energy data availability and management in Oregon, including how Pacific Power provides interval meter data and Energy Trust of Oregon's access to customer data. It also outlines Oregon's transportation and emissions policies, including adoption of California's Low-Emission Vehicle and Zero-Emission Vehicle programs.

ty Commission issued an final order amending interconnection rules that reflected a number of adjustments, including raising the size-limit on customer generation capacity. Last Updated: July 2018 ","CHP in energy efficiency standards: CHP...

AI summary The text discusses the amendment of interconnection rules by the Commission, increasing the size-limit on customer generation capacity. It also outlines Pennsylvania's Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS), which includes Combined Heat and Power (CHP) as an eligible resource, and mentions revenue streams and incentives available for CHP systems.

ncing: CHP systems may have access to state grants and loans through the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority (PEDA) and Commonwealth Financing Authority’s Alternative Clean Energy (ACE) Program. Net metering: Net metering rules apply...

AI summary The text discusses net metering and CHP systems in Pennsylvania, including eligibility criteria, rules, and programs such as the Alternative Clean Energy (ACE) Program. It references legislative acts and regulatory actions by the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission (PUC).

nsumption (i.e., system size is not limited by the customer's on-site load). Systems eligible for net metering include those that generate electricity using combined heat and power (CHP) technologies. Last Updated: July 2018 ","Some additi...

AI summary Pennsylvania supports combined heat and power (CHP) systems through policies and initiatives, including a CHP policy statement, collaboration with Penn State University on a microgrid demonstration project, and the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS) which recognizes renewable CHP as a Tier I resource.

Enabled Renewable Energy Guide” are also underway. The state also encourages the use of renewable-fueled CHP systems through its AEPS, which recognizes renewable CHP as eligible as a Tier I resource. Last Updated: July 2018 ",4 out of 20,"...

AI summary Pennsylvania has significantly expanded energy efficiency programs since the enactment of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (Act 129) in 2008, with oversight by the PUC. The program has evolved through multiple phases, setting increasing energy savings and demand response targets over time.

2424864, for details on DR and EE, respectively). The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. For further reading, in May 2009, as pa...

AI summary Pennsylvania utilities have expanded energy efficiency and demand response programs since the enactment of Act 129 in 2008, which established the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (EERS). Utilities file energy efficiency plans with the PUC, which may approve, reject, or modify them. Cost-recovery mechanisms and voluntary programs exist for natural gas and electric customers, including low-income households.

A has 13 rural electric cooperatives and several smaller municipalities that are not regulated by the Commission. The rural electric cooperatives do offer some electric efficiency programs/incentives. In 2016, the Commission approved a rat...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Pennsylvania, including the approval of natural gas EE&C programs by the PUC, the implementation of Phase III of Act 129, and the use of the total resource cost test as a primary cost-effectiveness test. It also mentions the absence of natural gas EERS in the state.

s one active program. For additional information on PACE, visit PACENation. The Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank (RIIB) administers the state C-PACE program and Efficient Buildings Fund for the state. LED Streetlight Program: $3.8 million...

AI summary The document outlines several energy efficiency and renewable energy programs in Rhode Island, including the LED Streetlight Program, Efficient Buildings Fund, Block Island Saves, and Charge Up!, each administered by different agencies and funded through RGGI and other sources.

ack the success and efficacy of these efforts and develop additional metrics, with significant community input, to evaluate how local marginalized groups are impacted by energy policy and programming. Rhode Island's State Energy Plan - Ene...

AI summary Rhode Island's Energy 2035 Plan includes policies supporting low-income and underserved customers through programs like WAP and LIHEAP, enhanced incentives for air source heat pumps, and targeted energy efficiency initiatives. The plan also emphasizes equitable heating sector transformation and sets specific funding levels for income-eligible programs in utility energy efficiency plans.

age. The state is in the process of matching properties with energy data and is seeking proposals for a web-based utility bill management application to streamline reporting and tracking capabilities. The state has also established the Rho...

AI summary Rhode Island is developing a web-based utility bill management application to streamline reporting and tracking. Additionally, the state established RIPEP, a three-year energy efficiency initiative, which completed energy audits, implemented efficiency projects, and used rebates and financing to achieve significant energy savings.

sts ESPCs as one of the main ways it promotes energy efficiency and cites funds used to engage energy service companies to use ESPCs. The state provides a model contract and a list of qualified ESCOs. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The Univer...

AI summary Rhode Island promotes energy efficiency through ESPCs, a voluntary stretch code for buildings, and the Energy Fellows Program. The state has adopted the 2015 IECC with amendments and supports a stretch code aiming for 15% more energy efficiency. Compliance with building codes is mandatory statewide.

w to 120-150 for a Standard review (usually complex projects). These standards were cited as supportive policies in the 2015 Energy Efficiency Program Plan which was approved by the Rhode Island PUC. Last Updated: August 2019 ","CHP in ene...

AI summary Rhode Island established energy efficiency standards and policies supporting combined heat and power (CHP) systems, including legislation requiring utilities to include CHP in their efficiency plans. National Grid implements a CHP Program offering incentives, with goals for 2018 and future years.

tional Grid's CHP Program. For any project greater than 1 new MW, a performance-based energy efficiency incentive, capped at $20/kW-year ($1.66/kW-month) for a period of up to ten years, is available. Last Updated: August 2019 ","Incentive...

AI summary Rhode Island supports combined heat and power (CHP) through incentives, streamlined permitting, and nonwires alternatives. Incentives range from $900/kW to $1250/kW, depending on system efficiency and energy efficiency commitments. Air permitting is simplified for CHP systems under Regulation No. 43. CHP is also eligible for nonwires alternatives to enhance grid reliability and resilience.

and authorizes utility demand-side management program plans, including budget amounts. The fee to support energy efficiency is a floor; actual spending amounts have exceeded this minimum requirement. The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary Rhode Island has a legislative requirement for electric and gas utilities to prioritize energy efficiency as the first resource in their loading order. The Comprehensive Energy Conservation, Efficiency and Affordability Act of 2006 mandates cost-effective energy efficiency procurement, with utilities submitting plans reviewed by the Public Utilities Commission. Energy efficiency budgets and savings are tracked in State Spending and Savings Tables.

: August 2017 ","There are currently no state policies that provide incentives for CHP deployment. Last Updated: August 2017 ","There are currently no additional supportive policies to encourage CHP. Last Updated: August 2017 ",2 out of 20...

AI summary South Dakota's utilities have limited energy efficiency programs, with spending and savings below the national average. Energy efficiency is considered in integrated resource planning, and some utilities offer rebate programs. The South Dakota Energy Smart Initiative supports energy efficiency efforts. No state policies currently provide incentives for CHP deployment.

olds that include young children, elderly, or disabled members are given priority for service. By Q3 2020, THDA allocated $9,695,185 to eligible candidates under the Weatherization Assistance Program. Finally, THDA administers Tennessee’s...

AI summary The Tennessee Housing Development Authority (THDA) administers the Weatherization Assistance Program and the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), allocating significant funds to assist low-income households. Additionally, the State of Tennessee transferred building energy management responsibilities to TDEC OEP via Executive Order No. 63, and SFUM was established to provide utility insights to State facilities.

7 end-users across General Government and Higher Education have been granted access to the UDM platform. As a result, the SFUM team is now able to provide aggregated utility consumption and cost data. As of May 2019, SFUM now tracks all ut...

AI summary Seven end-users in General Government and Higher Education have access to the UDM platform, allowing SFUM to provide aggregated utility consumption data. Since May 2019, SFUM tracks utility energy use at State-owned facilities, including higher education institutions, and measures energy efficiency project savings. The State of Tennessee benchmarks 100% of its State-owned facilities using various metrics.

ces. As of May 2020, the only area designated by the EPA as nonattainment in Tennessee is Sullivan County (Sullivan County does not meet the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard). Last Updated: July 2020 ","The State o...

AI summary The State of Tennessee does not track public sector performance contract projects, but TDEC OEP is aware of at least eight completed or ongoing projects. The Tennessee Board of Regents has completed 17 ESPC projects since 2004, with $54 million in investment and $6.8 million in annual savings. Legislation in 2018 allowed state procurement agencies to use alternative procurement methods for energy savings contracts.

n) that apply to all forms of CHP. Last Updated: July 2018 ","Tennessee has several policies and programs in place that can incentivize CHP deployment in addition to other technologies and resources. In 2015, the Tennessee Valley Authority...

AI summary Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has provided financial assistance for CHP projects, including a $6.75 million award to Erlanger Health Systems for a 6 MW CHP facility and a $6.75 million award for an 8 MW CHP facility at Erlanger Health System. Additionally, TVA and The Chemours Company converted a combustion turbine into a CHP plant with a capacity of 87 MW.

igible to receive up to six years of financing at a 2% interest for qualified energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. Qualifying entities could apply for loans between $20,000 and $5 million. At the State level, the Tennessee Gene...

AI summary Tennessee has implemented various policies to support combined heat and power (CHP) systems, including the Energy Independence Act of 2014, which amended tax codes to include CHP in natural gas configurations. The Tennessee Public Utility Commission allows utilities to recover costs and earn returns on CHP installations. Additional programs such as the Qualified Energy Conservation Bond Program and Clean Tennessee Energy Grant Program also support CHP deployment.

o and total program-level screening. The rules for benefit-cost tests are not specified. Some exceptions of flexibility exist in the application like low-income programs, pilots, and new technologies. Coordination of Ratepayer-Funded Low-I...

AI summary The text discusses Tennessee's energy efficiency policies, noting the absence of self-direct or opt-out programs, decoupling of utility profits from sales, and lack of policies rewarding successful energy efficiency programs. The Alignment and Usage Adjustment (AUA) mechanism was implemented to align ratepayer and utility interests, with a 2% accrual on margin recoveries. No policy requires utilities to release energy use data.

uipment. The rebate will cover 100% of the costs, up to $400 (Link). Last Reviewed: July 2020 ",0 out of 3,"Tennessee has not set appliance standards beyond those required by the federal government. Last Reviewed: June 2019 ", Texas,29,14....

AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency and appliance standards in Tennessee and Texas, including rebate programs, loan initiatives, and legislative requirements for energy consumption reduction. It highlights the absence of specific policies addressing equity and workforce development in clean energy.

nt seven years beginning September 1, 2019. Each political subdivision must submit a report annually to SECO regarding the entity's progress and efforts to meet the five percent annual reduction goal. In 2007, Governor Perry signed HB 3693...

AI summary The text outlines various legislative and executive actions in Tennessee aimed at promoting energy efficiency. These include HB 3693, which set energy reduction goals for schools and state agencies, and Executive Order RP 49, which was updated by SB 700 to require energy reporting. Energy Star Portfolio Manager is used for tracking progress, and programs like Energy Savings Performance Contracts are encouraged.

"," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource (SPEER) collaborated with the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO) to conduct a baseline study. The study did not attemp...

AI summary This section outlines Texas's efforts in energy code compliance through the South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource (SPEER) and the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). It details baseline studies, compliance studies, utility involvement, stakeholder groups, and training programs aimed at improving residential energy efficiency and code compliance.

aining/Outreach: SPEER has developed a statewide Energy Code Ambassador Program and these professionals have advanced training in the energy codes and provide peer-to-peer assistance to code officials and builders in their local areas, whi...

AI summary Texas has established policies and interconnection regulations that support combined heat and power (CHP) systems, including generous rules allowing up to 10 MW of distributed generation interconnection. Despite these policies, no new CHP systems were installed in Texas in 2018. SPEER and SECO also provide training and outreach programs to support energy code implementation.

creased modestly in recent years, they are still far below most other EERS policies, and as a result, utility energy efficiency program investments and savings in Texas are below the national average. To meet the efficiency goals, utilitie...

AI summary Texas energy efficiency programs are underfunded compared to national standards, resulting in lower-than-average savings. Utilities are required by law to meet efficiency goals, including 30% of load growth and 0.4% peak demand savings. Programs are funded through tariffs or base rates and are subject to PUCT approval.

information). In the 2011 legislative session, Texas adopted Senate Bill 1125, which amended the EERS policy by requiring utilities to eventually achieve savings of 0.4% of each company’s peak demand. To meet these goals, utilities adminis...

AI summary Texas established an energy efficiency resource standard in 1999, requiring utilities to offset 10% of load growth through energy efficiency. This was increased to 15% and 20% in 2007. Senate Bill 1125 in 2011 further required utilities to achieve 0.4% of peak demand savings. Programs are administered by utilities and providers to reduce peak demand and energy costs.

by December 31, 2009 (Texas House Bill 3693). The legislation also required utilities to submit energy savings goals. The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) approved these rules in March 2008. While the 2007 legislation required uti...

AI summary Texas legislation and regulatory actions, including Senate Bill 1125 and PUCT orders, establish energy savings goals and cost caps for utilities. The PUCT uses the utility cost test as the primary cost-effectiveness test for evaluating ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs.

ed the program into law on June 12th and the rebate goes into effect on Sept. 1, 2017. Last Reviewed: May 2020 ",0 out of 3,"Texas adopted plumbing product standards in 2009 for toilets and urinals. Last Reviewed: June 2019 ", U.S. Virgin...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs and policies in Texas and the U.S. Virgin Islands, including rebate programs, plumbing product standards, and energy service performance contracts. It also references the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE) as a source of information.

rformance contracting stakeholders agreed to reinstate the Utah Chapter of the Energy Services Coalition to raise awareness and educate stakeholders about energy performance contracting opportunities. The Governor's Office of Energy Develo...

AI summary The Utah Chapter of the Energy Services Coalition has been reinstated to promote energy performance contracting. The Governor's Office of Energy Development and Division of Facilities Construction and Management have established a pre-approved list of third-party reviewers for energy savings performance contracting, complementing a list of energy savings companies. Utah's GESPC program meets most success metrics, and contract templates are being developed to streamline project processes.

IMT, and energy code compliance findings from the study will be incorporated into Utah's energy code training program. More info at: https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/articles/department-energy-invests-115-million-building-america-indu...

AI summary Utah is enhancing energy code compliance through utility programs, stakeholder groups, and training initiatives. Utilities offer incentives for compliant equipment, and the Uniform Building Code Commission provides recommendations and public input. A three-year training program with utilities has been established to improve code enforcement and builder training.

g materials are provided to builders, code officials, and trades in the form of compliance pathways, short guides to the residential and commercial energy codes, and a dedicated website (in process). Last Updated: September 2020 ",,"Utah o...

AI summary Utah provides compliance pathways and resources for energy codes and offers incentives for CHP systems through the Alternative Energy Development Incentive (AEDI). The state's interconnection rules apply to all electric generation resources, even though CHP is not specifically defined as an eligible technology. There are currently no state policies designed to acquire energy savings or generation from CHP.

ble “renewables” include electric generation facilities that produce electricity from waste gas and waste heat. Funding may be available for CHP systems through federal pre-disaster mitigation funds. Last Updated: July 2019 ",6.5 out of 20...

AI summary Utah's utilities implement energy efficiency programs as required by the Public Service Commission. Rocky Mountain Power scaled back its programs based on integrated resource plans. Legislation from 2009 mandates annual energy consumption reductions. Questar Gas implemented efficiency programs and changed its decoupling mechanism in 2010.

As part of its Triennial Plan for FY2020-FY2022, Efficiency Maine Trust (EMT) establishes program budgets that reflect the minimum funding allocations to low-income customers set forth in statute [see 35-A MRS §10110(2)(B)] and 35-A MRS §1...

AI summary Efficiency Maine Trust (EMT) sets program budgets for low-income customers based on statutory and regulatory requirements. The Trust allocates 10% of electric and RGGI funds to low-income programs, while a reasonable percentage is set for natural gas funds. Maine's climate action plan aims to install 15,000 heat pumps in low-income households by 2025 and double home weatherization efforts.

mated highway mileage rating of at least 35 mpg. Pursuant to the Governor's Executive Order, the Maine DOT Central Fleet has purchased six battery electric vehicles for usage across state government. Last Updated: July 2020 ","In 1999, Mai...

AI summary Maine has implemented energy efficiency initiatives, including the adoption of the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code and the use of Energy Saving Performance Contracts (ESPCs). The state also administers energy efficiency programs through Efficiency Maine and has invested in research and development through the Maine Technology Institute.

OUs are required to offer net metering to customer-generators up to 100 kW, but, they are authorized to offer net metering to eligible facilities with capacity limits up to 660 kW at their discretion. Net metering is available to owners of...

AI summary The document outlines net metering requirements for customer-generators in Maine, including capacity limits and efficiency requirements for CHP systems. It also discusses supportive policies for CHP, such as funding for technical assistance and eligibility for renewable credits. Efficiency Maine is highlighted as an organization responsible for administering energy efficiency programs in the state.

ion enacted in 2013 requires the utilities to fund Efficiency Maine’s budgets at a level sufficient to procure all electric and natural gas efficiency that is cost-effective, reliable, and achievable. The most recent budgets for energy eff...

AI summary Efficiency Maine administers energy efficiency programs for electric and natural gas customers in Maine, funded by utilities and state programs. The 2013 Omnibus Energy Act extended these programs to all natural gas utilities, and at least 10% and 20% of funds must support low-income and small business customers, respectively. Funds are collected through rate surcharges and managed by Efficiency Maine.

grants, such as those received from the Federal government's American Recovery Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in 2010. The funds for natural gas conservation programs are collected through a rate surcharge. The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary Maine's energy efficiency programs are funded through rate surcharges and are required by statute to procure all cost-effective energy efficiency. Efficiency Maine operates under triennial plans, with the most recent covering fiscal years 2017-2019. Annual savings targets for 2020-2022 are approximately 2.3% for electricity and 0.1% for natural gas.

ird Triennial Plan covering fiscal years 2017-2019 was approved in 2016. Last reviewed: September 2020 ","Summary: Annual savings targets of ~2.3% for electric and 0.1% for natural gas for 2020-2022. The Maine Public Utilities Commission (...

AI summary The fourth Triennial Plan of Efficiency Maine, approved by the Maine Public Utilities Commission, sets annual energy efficiency savings targets for 2020-2022, including 2.3% for electricity and 0.1% for natural gas. The plan incorporates long-term statutory targets, such as reducing electricity and natural gas consumption by 20% by 2020 and conducting weatherization of homes.

all ensure that measures to reduce the cost of residential heating are available for low-income households..."" and EMT allocates a minimum of 10% to Low-Income Initiatives. See 35-A MRS §10109(4)(A). Following the passage of LD 1766 in 20...

AI summary The text discusses Maine's efforts to ensure low-income households have access to residential heating cost reductions, including the allocation of LIHEAP funds for heat pump installations. It also covers cost-effectiveness rules for low-income energy efficiency programs and coordination with WAP services.

ility, serving roughly 80% of statewide load, proposed and was granted decoupling in its rate case in 2014 (Docket No. 2013-00168). Last reviewed: September 2020 ","Guidelines for Third Party Access In 2007, Maine's Electronic Business Tra...

AI summary Maine's energy sector has implemented decoupling in its rate case, allowing Efficiency Maine access to individual meter data through a Commission Order. Guidelines for third-party access and electronic data interchange standards have been established to support retail competition and data dissemination.

th potential, early stage Virginia companies capable of driving job creation, reducing energy consumption, increasing energy generation from renewable resources, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Last Updated: July 2018 ","The Virgini...

AI summary The Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) mandates 100% clean power by 2045 for Dominion Energy and 2050 for Appalachian Power Company, increases energy efficiency investments for low-income customers, and enables participation in RGGI. The VCEA also allocates 50% of RGGI revenue to support low-income energy efficiency programs. Virginia lacks a disclosure policy for energy benchmarking in buildings.

purchase of fuel-efficient, low-emission state-owned vehicles, when practicable. In addition, DGS’s leasing vehicles guidelines encourage the use of compact, fuel-efficient, and low-emission vehicles. The state included in the 2014 Virgini...

AI summary Virginia's Department of General Services (DGS) has policies promoting the purchase of fuel-efficient and low-emission vehicles for state fleets. The 2014 Virginia Energy Plan aimed to increase the number of natural gas, propane, and electric vehicles in government fleets to 300 by 2017. Funding and loan programs support these initiatives, particularly in nonattainment and maintenance areas.

ic, mandatory requirement for increasing state fleet efficiency. State alternative-fuel vehicle procurement requirements that give a voluntary option to count efficient vehicles are thus not included. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The Depart...

AI summary The Virginia Energy Management Program (VEMP) is administered by the Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) and the Department of General Services (DGS), providing performance contracting for state facilities. Governor McDonnell's 2010 executive order and Executive Directive 2 from 2011 emphasized improving energy efficiency and transitioning VEMP to a self-sustaining operation.

onversion of VEMP to a self-sustaining enterprise operation and to create a plan to centralize energy management across state facilities to seek out economies of scale and greater energy efficiencies. Governor McAuliffe issued Executive Or...

AI summary The text discusses the conversion of the Virginia Energy Management Program (VEMP) into a self-sustaining enterprise and the centralization of energy management across state facilities to achieve economies of scale and energy efficiency. It also references Executive Order 31 issued by Governor McAuliffe, which promotes energy efficiency measures, including Energy Performance Contracting (EPC), and highlights investments in EPCs and the role of various organizations in advancing clean energy technologies and research.

resource plan. The authors also recommend developing strategies for achieving the target. These include utility investments, private market mobilization, and the deployment of CHP in public buildings. Last Updated: August 2019 ",1.5 out of...

AI summary Virginia has made significant legislative progress in clean energy and energy efficiency, including the Grid Transformation and Security Act of 2018, which mandates $1.3 billion in energy efficiency spending over ten years. The state also set a legislative goal in 2007 to reduce electricity consumption by 10% by 2022 and established mandatory energy efficiency targets for utilities.

Transformation and Security Act of 2018 (HB 1558/SB 966), which requires regulated utilities to spend $1.3 billion on energy efficiency over the next ten years, more than tripling efficiency budgets. Virginia’s State Corporation Commission...

AI summary Virginia's energy efficiency regulations require Dominion Energy and ApCo to achieve specific energy savings targets by 2025. The 2020 VCEA mandates 5% and 2% savings respectively, translating to average annual savings of 1.2% over four years. The state also requires integrated resource plans from utilities and has authorized cost recovery for energy efficiency programs.

agencies to ensure that marginalized voices are centered in the grant programs, agency request legislation, and other significant actions taken by the agency. Goals and metrics for tracking progress In 2019, legislation was passed that cre...

AI summary In 2019, legislation was passed in WA to prioritize vulnerable populations in CEF grant programs and establish new funding for community solar projects benefiting low-income households. The Clean Energy Transformation Act (CETA) introduced low-income and equity provisions, mandating utilities to provide energy assistance programs and report on their effectiveness in reducing energy burden.

ergy assistance need, or increase of 15% from 2018, by 2030; and (B) 90% current energy assistance need by 2050. Utilities are mandated to make progress on these goals as part of compliance with CETA. CETA also included equity provisions a...

AI summary Washington State's CETA mandates utilities to meet energy assistance goals and ensure equitable distribution of clean energy benefits. The legislation includes provisions for equity in utility planning, requiring integrated resource plans to consider cumulative impacts on vulnerable communities. Clean energy workforce development is also emphasized as part of the initiative.

that each lease or purchase of new vehicles shall prioritize battery electric vehicles(BEV) (or better emerging technology), and that all trips which could be feasibly made by BEVs shall be utilized. Last Updated: July 2020 ","Washington h...

AI summary Washington State prioritizes battery electric vehicles (BEVs) in new vehicle leases and purchases, and utilizes energy performance contracting to improve public facility efficiency. The Smart Buildings Center and WSU's Energy Program support building energy technology development and energy efficiency initiatives.

ding for energy efficiency programs and services. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Washington,...

AI summary Washington incorporates energy efficiency as a key resource in its planning and investment decisions. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Seventh Power Plan outlines targets for energy efficiency acquisition, aiming to meet electricity load growth and contribute significantly to the region's future energy needs.

rd-party consultants selected by the utilities. Each electric utility files, develops, and maintains an EM&V Framework as well as an EM&V Plan, which is filed with each Biennial Conservation Plan. Washington uses two of the benefit-cost te...

AI summary Washington uses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Utility Cost Test (UCT) as benefit-cost tests for energy efficiency programs. The Energy Independence Act of 2006 mandates independent third-party evaluations of conservation savings, selected by utilities with input from advisory groups and Commission staff.

duce the usage of gasoline and diesel fuel in state-owned vehicles that is petroleum based by at least 20% for gasoline by 2015 and 10% for diesel by 2015 as compared to the total amount used in 2006. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","Wisco...

AI summary Wisconsin state statute §16.85 (5) and Governor Walker’s Executive Order #63 mandate energy conservation and renewable energy initiatives in state-owned facilities. The Department of Administration (DOA) is tasked with implementing these measures and ensuring new facilities are more energy efficient than commercial code. Additionally, the DOA can fund energy conservation projects through public debt up to $220 million, with contractors guaranteeing energy savings.

he minimum savings in energy usage that will be realized by the state from construction of the project and the contractor shall guarantee that the savings will be realized pursuant to §16.847 (2) (c). The commission, under §13.48 (2) (h),...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for energy efficiency and renewable energy systems in new construction and building projects in Wisconsin, including the use of performance contracts and technical assistance programs to ensure energy savings.

-1980s when integrated resource planning—termed the ""Advance Plan Process""—was enacted by PSCW. This process is no longer in place and has been replaced by biennial ""strategic energy assessments."" Under the 2005 Wisconsin Act 141, over...

AI summary In the 1980s, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) implemented the Advance Plan Process for integrated resource planning, which was later replaced by biennial strategic energy assessments. The 2005 Wisconsin Act 141 transferred oversight of the Focus on Energy program to PSCW, requiring investor-owned utilities to spend 1.2% of their revenues on energy efficiency and renewable programs, while municipal and cooperative utilities must collect $8 per meter for similar initiatives.

to fulfill their obligations under Act 141. SEERA is required to create and fund Focus on Energy and to contract, on the basis of competitive bids, with one or more persons to administer the programs. The most recent budgets for energy eff...

AI summary Wisconsin's Focus on Energy program is funded through a non-bypassable charge on customer bills and is overseen by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin. Investor-owned utilities may also operate voluntary energy efficiency programs, which require PSC approval. Municipal and electric cooperative utilities have the option to participate in Focus on Energy or run their own Commitment to Community programs.

programs. Municipal and retail electric cooperative utilities can collect the dollars and participate in the Focus on Energy program or can elect to operate their own Commitment to Community programs. Program cost recovery is handled via i...

AI summary The document outlines how program cost recovery is managed through rate cases and escrow accounts, with the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin overseeing the programs. Investor-owned utilities established SEERA to administer energy efficiency programs under Act 141. Focus on Energy offers residential and non-residential energy efficiency and renewable energy programs.

itutional, industrial, and agricultural sectors). The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","The Public...

AI summary The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin conducts a Strategic Energy Assessment every two years to assess electric energy needs and resources, but it does not result in regulatory orders. Energy efficiency and renewable goals are set every four years, with the most recent goals established in 2010. Funding limitations have led to reductions in energy efficiency targets.

was approved by the Joint Finance Committee of the state legislature, the state limited funding to Focus on Energy to 1.2% of revenues, which resulted in a major reduction in energy efficiency goals. The Commission in May 2018 set four-yea...

AI summary The Joint Finance Committee limited Focus on Energy's funding to 1.2% of revenues, reducing energy efficiency goals. The Commission set four-year savings targets for 2019-2022, using lifecycle terms. Wisconsin's evaluation of energy efficiency programs is guided by Act 141 and PSC Chapter 137, with an independent evaluator required for annual evaluations.

enhanced incentives were 18 offered in Custom program and Direct Install program (Small Business Energy Solutions) to 19 further incentivize customers to start and complete projects. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (SBA) IR-05 Page 3 of 3 M1...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) outlines enhanced incentives in its Custom and Direct Install programs under Small Business Energy Solutions. The document references E1's response to the Small Business Advocate's (SBA) inquiry about fuel cost projections in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, directing to prior responses related to the Industrial Group (IG).

10 Page 2 of 2 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) Inf...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) is responding to information requests from the Small Business Advocate (SBA) regarding the 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, specifically related to savings data categorized by measure life and rate classes, and how budget allocations would change if focused on longer-lived measures.

Efficient Energy Energy Energy Efficient Energy Energy Energy Program Costs + Energy Product Savings Demand Existing Savings Demand New Savings Demand Product Savings Demand Custom Savings Demand Direct Savings Demand Enabling Enabling Sav...

AI summary The document presents a table detailing energy program costs and savings across various rate classes, including residential, commercial, and industrial categories. It outlines rebate amounts, energy savings in gigawatt-hours (GWh), and demand savings in megawatts (MW) for different programs such as residential, BNI, custom incentives, direct installation, and enabling strategies.

Efficient Energy Energy Energy Efficient Energy Energy Energy Program Costs + Energy Product Savings Demand Existing Savings Demand New Savings Demand Product Savings Demand Custom Savings Demand Direct Savings Demand Enabling Enabling Sav...

AI summary The document presents a table outlining program costs and energy savings across various rate classes and energy efficiency programs. It details savings in terms of gigawatt-hours (GWh) and megawatts (MW) for different programs such as residential, BNI, custom incentives, and enabling strategies.

Program costs, energy savings, and demand savings by participating rate class

AI summary The text provides an overview of program costs, energy savings, and demand savings categorized by participating rate classes. It highlights the relationship between different rate classes and their respective contributions to energy and demand savings through various programs.

Efficient Energy Energy Energy Efficient Energy Energy Energy Program Costs + Energy Product Savings Demand Existing Savings Demand New Savings Demand Product Savings Demand Custom Savings Demand Direct Savings Demand Enabling Enabling Sav...

AI summary The document presents a table outlining energy program costs and savings across various rate classes, including residential, commercial, and industrial categories. It includes data on rebates, demand savings, and program-specific metrics for different energy efficiency initiatives.

Program costs, energy savings, and demand savings by participating rate class

AI summary The text presents an overview of program costs, energy savings, and demand savings categorized by participating rate classes, highlighting the financial and operational impact of energy efficiency programs across different customer segments.

Efficient Energy Energy Energy Efficient Energy Energy Energy Program Costs + Energy Product Savings Demand Existing Savings Demand New Savings Demand Product Savings Demand Custom Savings Demand Direct Savings Demand Enabling Enabling Sav...

AI summary The text presents a table outlining various energy efficiency programs, including rebate amounts, energy savings in gigawatt-hours (GWh), and demand savings in megawatts (MW) for different rate classes such as Small General, General Demand, and Small Industrial. The table highlights the financial and energy-saving impacts of different program categories, such as product rebates, direct installation, and enabling strategies.

on Activities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-23: 2 3 Referencing Figure 6 or Section 7.2.3.5 of the EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM...

AI summary E1 is winding down the New Home Construction (NHC) program due to anticipated reductions in future energy savings and budget constraints. The program's closure is expected to impact costs in the first year of the Settlement Plan, with no further investment included beyond 2023. E1 will continue to support new residential building through alternative formats.

E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics (Synapse) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL - o execution of peak shifting and generation contingency events (peak shifting events are to help shift electrical consumption away from when the gri...

AI summary E1 has completed its first winter season of the DLC pilot and is evaluating results to inform future planning, including the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. NS Power will continue calling events in 2022, including renewable following use cases. E1's independent Evaluation Consultant will provide evaluated savings from the pilot in the 2022 annual impact evaluation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: - 1. The Board approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 in the aggregate amount of $102,150,000 with a target of total cumulative energy savings of 405.9 GWh and demand savings of 62.5 MW. Approved spending is $33,210,0...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) approves a DSM Plan for 2016-2018 with a total budget of $102,150,000 and sets targets for energy and demand savings. It also approves agreements, outlines reporting and research requirements, and directs the submission of alternate DSM budget scenarios and rate impact analyses.

- (d) "Consequential Losses" means consequential, special, incidental, multiple, exemplary or punitive damages including lost profits, whether such claim of lost profits is categorized as indirect, direct or consequential damages or under...

AI summary The text defines key legal terms and concepts in a contractual agreement, including 'Consequential Losses,' 'Contract Documents,' 'EECA Plan,' and 'Force Majeure Event,' among others. These definitions are part of a broader legal framework governing obligations and responsibilities under the agreement.

The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3-year Cumulative Annual Net Energy and Net Peak Demand Savings) associated with carrying out EECAs over the Term. Cumulative Annual Net Cumulative Annual Net Peak Energy Savings at Generat...

AI summary The text outlines the performance targets for energy efficiency and conservation agreements (EECAs), specifying cumulative energy and peak demand savings over the term. These targets are to be achieved in accordance with the EECA Plan and the Consensus Agreement.

Permitted Scope of Use 2. The Recipient may use the Confidential Information solely for the purposes of providing or receiving EECA, as the case may be, in accordance with the Legislation and the Supply Agreement and for no other reason or...

AI summary The Recipient is permitted to use Confidential Information solely for the purpose of providing or receiving EECA, in accordance with the Legislation and the Supply Agreement, and for no other reason or purpose.

1 Figure 1.1 - 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)2 Incremental Incremental Annual Net Annual Net Energy Savings Demand Savings at Generator at Generator (GWh) (MW) T...

AI summary The table presents investment and savings data from the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, showing increasing investments and savings over the years. It includes metrics such as energy and demand savings, as well as cost tests related to the program.

a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value ofthe avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life ofthe program measures. , b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum ofENS's and partici...

AI summary The text discusses metrics used to evaluate the benefits of energy efficiency programs, including net present value of avoided costs, TRC (total benefit/cost ratio), and PAC (program benefit/cost ratio), as well as program-level investment and savings data for the years 2016 to 2018.

4 Figure 1.2 - 2016 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2016 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total...

AI summary Figure 1.2 from the 2016 DSM Resource Plan outlines investment and savings for various demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia. It details program investments, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost-benefit ratios for residential and non-residential initiatives.

Figure 1.3 - 2017 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2017 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)8 Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.3 details the 2017 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including program-specific investments, benefits, and efficiency metrics. The table shows investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost-benefit ratios for various DSM programs, with total investment at $34.02 million and total lifetime benefits of $138.7 million.

DATE REVISED: September 15, 2015 Page 5 of27 a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life ofthe program measures. b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing life...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits as the net present value of avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of program measures. It also defines TRC and PAC as benefit/cost ratios and references ENS's planned participation by low-income customers under the 2015 DSM Resource Settlement Agreement.

Figure 1.4 - 2018 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 2018 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)" Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Re...

AI summary Figure 1.4 from the 2018 DSM Resource Plan outlines investment and benefits for various demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia. It includes data on energy and demand savings, cost tests, and program-specific investments, providing a detailed breakdown of residential and non-residential initiatives.

2.2 Existing Residential 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Existing Residential program is designed to help reduce electricity consumption for space and water heating and lighting. The goal is to promote cost-effective energy efficiency improvem...

AI summary The Existing Residential program aims to reduce electricity consumption in residential buildings through energy efficiency improvements. It offers incentives, rebates, and financing options for upgrades like heating systems and lighting. Services are delivered via service organizations and include promotional activities and contractor engagement.

2.3 New Residential 1 2 To encourage energy efficient design and use of energy efficient products in new residential construction, Efficiency Nova Scotia's New Residential services are offered to builders and owners of new houses, includin...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia offers New Residential services to promote energy efficiency in new homes, aiming for ENERGY STAR® certification. The program provides pre-construction advice and post-construction ratings. The 2016-2018 DSM Plan does not include Energy Saving Actions, and the Home Energy Report pilot was paused due to affordability concerns.

1 will Custom Rebates incentives through the Incentives and Efficient Products programs 2 New but by be available for measures that qualify that are not supported the 3 Construction Program. 4 5 market The Custom Incentives program will co...

AI summary The document discusses the Custom Rebates and Incentives programs offered through the Incentives and Efficient Products programs. These programs will provide tailored offerings for specific market segments, including retro-commissioning, compressed air optimization, energy management systems, and employee engagement initiatives. The programs aim to support energy efficiency and management efforts.

4 5 Enabling Strategies are essential to ensure that ENS is able to increase awareness about energy efficiency, evolve services, and provide information and tools needed by Nova Scotians to make informed energy choices. This, in turn, driv...

AI summary Enabling Strategies are crucial for ENS to enhance energy efficiency awareness, evolve services, and drive market transformation. These strategies include education, research, and regulatory activities. ENS emphasizes their role in achieving cost efficiencies and long-term DSM results, even amid short-term affordability concerns.

1 Revised Table 9: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023-2025 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savin...

AI summary The table outlines the investment and savings associated with various residential energy efficiency programs from 2023 to 2025, including details on energy savings, peak demand reductions, and administrative costs for each program component.

1 Revised Table 31: 2023-2025 Existing Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Re Cost Tes incl. esource st (TRC) a excl. Admini gram istrator st (PAC) b...

AI summary Revised Table 31 outlines residential performance indicators for 2023-2025, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs associated with energy efficiency programs. The data shows increasing investment and energy savings over the three-year period, with consistent lifetime unit costs.

7 Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment First-Year Energy nvestment Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) b Participation Participation Participation Li...

AI summary The Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario table compares investment, energy savings, demand savings, and costs for both scenarios over three years. The Settlement Plan shows higher investment and savings compared to the Alternate Scenario, with variations expressed as percentages. The table includes metrics such as Total Resource Cost (TRC), Program Administrator Cost (PAC), and participation numbers.

4. REBATES - (a) Any rebates available under this Agreement are strictly for new equipment and cannot be combined with any other Efficiency Nova Scotia offer. Any rebates provided under this Agreement are subject to change without notice....

AI summary This section outlines the rebate program under the Agreement, specifying eligibility criteria, restrictions, and procedural requirements. Rebates are limited to new equipment in multifamily buildings with affordable units and cannot be combined with other Efficiency Nova Scotia offers. Applicants must obtain pre-approval and submit required documentation for rebate payments.

8. MAINTENANCE - (a) The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the units are maintained to a minimum level of health and safety. - (b) Any contactor(s) hired by the Applicant will install at the property set out herein the energ...

AI summary The maintenance section outlines the Applicant's responsibility for ensuring the health and safety of units, contractor obligations for installing energy construction measures, and the responsibility for associated costs such as sales tax, disposal, and recycling.

Business Energy Rebates Enhanced Agricultural Rebates initiative is currently available which includes increased incentives for select dairy equipment, high efficiency fans, and high-volume low speed (HVLS) fans. In addition, adjustments w...

AI summary The document outlines updates to Business Energy Rebates in Nova Scotia, including enhanced incentives for agricultural equipment, the addition of horticultural lighting as a new measure, and adjustments to performance requirements for heat pumps to improve rebate accessibility.

Technical Tables workbook Referenced Table/Figure Tab(s) and details Table 2 Tab: "18. BC Ratios" for benefits, costs, and TRC results Tab: "23. Levelized Cost" for levelized costs Table 3 Same as Table 2 Referenced Table/Figure Tab(s) and...

AI summary The document references technical tables and figures related to BC ratios, levelized costs, demand potential, and annual costs. It includes instructions for filtering scenarios and tabs for analysis. E1 has responded to information requests from Synapse Energy Economics.

(a) The DLC-smart thermostat program enrollment assumptions were guided by those used in the "Nova Scotia Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Potential Study for 2021-2045" and adjusted for the Plan based on a pragmatic ramp up associate...

AI summary The text discusses the basis for enrollment and unit impact assumptions in the DLC-smart thermostat program, referencing EfficiencyOne's response to Synapse IR-24. It outlines the source of incentives and administrative costs for the 2023-2025 Plan period, linking them to a study on energy efficiency and demand response potential in Nova Scotia.

1 [Appendix A, Attachment 5] 2 Request IR-32: 3 4 Refer to Attachment 5, Section 3.2.3 BNI Curtailment Option and Table 16. 5 6 (a) Please provide analyses or studies that support the proposed program enrollment 7 assumptions. 8 9 (b) Plea...

AI summary The document outlines requests and responses related to the BNI Curtailment Option and Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) Option in a regulatory proceeding. It asks for analyses supporting enrollment assumptions, unit impacts, and administrative costs, with responses referencing studies and documentation.

(a) The EV Charging Control enrollment assumptions were sourced from the "Nova Scotia Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Potential Study for 2021-2045". (b) Please refer to the "Unit Impact by Enduse" tab in Attachment 1 of EfficiencyOn...

AI summary The text discusses the assumptions and cost structures related to EV Charging Control enrollment in Nova Scotia's energy efficiency and demand response programs. It references studies, vendor bids, and administrative costs, including a fixed delivery cost and ongoing incentives for participants.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-3: Does NS Power accept E1's comparative analysis of DSM lifetime unit costs against annual fuel costs as presented in Table 8 on page 51 of 65? If not please explain. Response IR-3: The anticipated lifetime cos...

AI summary NS Power does not accept E1's comparative analysis of DSM lifetime unit costs against annual fuel costs as presented in Table 8. Instead, NS Power argues that the anticipated lifetime cost of DSM measures in the 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, at $0.035/kWh, is a more appropriate comparator over the short term.

Increased ambition over time In our view, it is essential for all parts of our energy system to support a rapid and fair transition to a zero carbon economy. Increasing investments in deeper efficiency measures is vitally important to the...

AI summary The text emphasizes the need for increased investment in deeper energy efficiency measures to accelerate the transition to a zero-carbon economy. It praises NS Power's current programming under the Agreement but advocates for raising efficiency spending to 3% and prioritizing deeper retrofits with greater savings.

1 Figure 1. Plan vs. Achieved Annual Savings - Residential 3 Since 2019, E1's savings goals have declined slightly. Despite the COVID-19 4 pandemic, E1 has been able to keep achieved savings relatively in line with projections for 5 the re...

AI summary Since 2019, E1's residential energy savings goals have slightly declined, but achieved savings have remained largely aligned with projections despite the pandemic. A 23.9 GWh cumulative gap (16% of targets) exists over three years, with a disproportionately larger gap in low-income sectors.

12 Q. WHAT SCENARIO DO YOU RECOMMEND AND WHY? 13 A. I recommend that the Board adopt the Settlement Plan since it represents a significant step 14 in the right direction for efficiency saving and investment levels that have lagged those 15...

AI summary The respondent recommends adopting the Settlement Plan over the Alternate Scenario due to its higher investment and savings levels, particularly for low-income residents. The Settlement Plan addresses a growing gap in energy efficiency investment compared to the 2014 and 2020 IRPs and is seen as a more equitable approach.

Economic and Policy Analysis Small Business Utility Advocate ‐ California (June 2020 – Present) - ‐ Performing data analysis of underserved small and medium business customers as part of the California Energy Efficiency Coordinating Commit...

AI summary The text discusses the role of the Small Business Utility Advocate in California, focusing on data analysis of underserved small and medium businesses, analysis of arrearages due to COVID-19, and contributions to policy recommendations and clean energy financing initiatives.

Development and Implementation of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plans UGI Utilities, Inc. – Pennsylvania (June 2015 – Present) Assist UGI Utilities, Inc. and PNG with the development and approval of Energy Efficiency and Conservation...

AI summary The text outlines the development and implementation of energy efficiency and conservation plans for UGI Utilities, Inc. and PNG Gas, including the design of multi-year plans with specific funding amounts and docket numbers for each initiative.

Natural Gas Efficiency Options and EE&C Plan for Peoples Natural Gas Peoples Natural Gas, Inc. – Pennsylvania (September 2017 – February 2019) - Prepared report on program, sector, and portfolio‐level cost and savings for 29 natural gas ad...

AI summary Peoples Natural Gas prepared a report analyzing natural gas efficiency opportunities for 29 administrators across 11 states, developed a five-year, $42 million Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plan, and provided testimony to support its adoption.

Training for NGOs Working on Energy Efficiency Projects in China ISC and NRDC – United States and China (August 2008 – September 2010) - Developed training materials and provided remote and in‐person training sessions on the economic and f...

AI summary This document outlines a training initiative by ISC and NRDC from 2008 to 2010 to support NGOs in China with energy efficiency projects, focusing on financial analysis and incentive structuring for industrial retrofits, and collaboration with local institutions in Guangdong and Jiangsu provinces.

Testimony 1. Pennsylvania PUC R‐2022‐3031211. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania – Rate Case. March 2022. Three‐year energy efficiency plan proposal. 2. Ontario Energy Board (OEB), EB‐2021‐0002. Enbridge Gas Inc. – Multi Year Demand Side Managem...

AI summary The document lists various regulatory proceedings from different jurisdictions, focusing on energy efficiency plans, demand-side management, and utility rate cases. These include analyses of program goals, implementation, and impacts on affordability and bill management.

Table 2: Residential Sector Programs: Low-Income Assumptions and Calculations Program Program Component Assumptions Calculation for 2023-2025 DSM Plan Residential Instant Savings Low-income Nova Scotians are assumed to be Low-income IS sav...

AI summary The table outlines assumptions and calculations for low-income participation in residential energy efficiency programs under the 2023-2025 DSM Plan. It assumes low-income Nova Scotians are 10% as likely to participate in programs like Instant Savings and Appliance Retirement, while participation in other programs like Home Energy Assessment and Green Heat is not assumed. Calculations use percentages of total savings and expenditures for low-income participants.

E1 Proposed Charges to NS Power for DSM Measures ($Millions) Category 2023 2024 2025 Total Residential – product rebates $4.0 $4.6 $5.6 $14.1 Residential – existing 20.9 22.5 23.6 67.0 Residential – new 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 Subtotal 25.7 27.1 2...

AI summary The document presents proposed charges to Nova Scotia Power for Demand-Side Management (DSM) measures from 2023 to 2025, showing a significant increase compared to the 2020-2022 plan. The total proposed cost is $173 million, nearly double the previous budget of $110 million when excluding Demand Response.

with the MEUs as well within this program. Flexibility is needed to ensure that all cost-effective opportunities for the MEUs can be explored in collaboration with E1 within the 2023-2025 time period. Finally, with respect to the DSM spend...

AI summary MEUs support E1's proposed DSM spending levels for 2023-2025, emphasizing flexibility in exploring cost-effective opportunities. They recommend allowing wholesale market participants to pay DSM costs directly to E1, enhancing transparency and fostering collaboration between E1 and MEUs, separate from NS Power's rate processes.

Q. What is the allocation of the spending and benefits in terms of customer classes? A. E1 describes on Page 13 of the Plan filing that the portfolio will be allocated a variety of ways. In terms of investment, the Plan allocates spending...

AI summary E1's Plan filing allocates 55/45% of investment to residential vs. business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) customers, resulting in a 40/60% energy savings split. Low-income investment comprises 17-22% of total energy efficiency spending over three years, aligning with 2016 Census data on low-income prevalence.

Exhibit E13 – Response to SBA IR-01. 1 Q. What information have you relied on to form the basis of your testimony? 2 A. I have reviewed E1's application filed in M10473 as well as responses to information 3 requests issued by Board Staff,...

AI summary The testimony discusses the evaluation of E1's DSM Resource Plan, highlighting differences in cost effectiveness between customer classes, concerns about rate impacts on small businesses, and recommendations for focusing funding on high-impact measures and reallocating resources to improve carbon reduction goals.

Program Program Component Target Market Segment Delivery Approach Enhancements in Settlement Plan Section Reference BNI Efficient Product Rebates Business Energy Rebates Existing and new construction BNI facilities Point of sale rebates an...

AI summary The text outlines various program components under the BNI Efficient Product Rebates, including Business Energy Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation, targeting different market segments. It also references specific sections of the document and raises a question about the investment in BNI classes and their rate impact.

A. Implications of failing the TRC test vary depending on the ultimate goal of the individual measure or program. For example, measures and programs aimed at helping to reduce Exhibit E13 - Response to SBA IR-16. 1 customer bills are more...

AI summary The text discusses the implications of failing the TRC test for energy programs, emphasizing that measures failing this test may not be cost-effective. It highlights that certain programs, such as those aimed at reducing customer bills, may be more costly to implement than simply providing credits. The text also raises a question about whether measures with TRC test results below 1.0 should be excluded from E1 programs.

- A. Yes, however the threshold could be set at 0.9 or less to show a preference for energy savings rather than continue a higher consumption of energy that NSPI will have to serve with generation and capacity, which would demonstrate a pr...

AI summary The discussion addresses the redirection of investments in measures failing the TRC test within the DSM Plan, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of BNI sector programs compared to residential ones. It also mentions setting a threshold for energy savings preference.

- A. Generally speaking, yes. While the exact percentages change from year to year, they do remain at an approximate 55/45% split in the favor of the Residential Sector. 1 Q. Do you know any reason why the growth in expenditures could not...

AI summary The discussion centers on the allocation of investment in BNI programs, with a suggestion to shift 80% of the increase in expenditures above 2022 levels toward the most cost-effective measures, moving away from the current 50/50% split utilized by E1 as outlined in the July 2016 Consensus Agreement.

- 1. We recommend that E1 should focus funding on measures and programs that maximize carbon reduction and compare DSM measures against similar levels of carbon-free generation. - 2. While we recognize the desire to spread dollars among th...

AI summary The testimony recommends that E1 should prioritize funding for demand-side management (DSM) measures that maximize carbon reduction and focus on programs with the highest cost-effectiveness ratios. It also suggests reallocating funds from DSM investments beyond 2022 levels to improve economics and support carbon goals.

Expert Testimony FORUM ON BEHALF OF MATTER Arkansas Public Service Commission Arkansas Public Service Commission General Staff Formula Rate Plan Filings of Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company Pursuant to APSC Docket No. 16-052-U Docket No. 18-...

AI summary The text presents a table of expert testimony from various regulatory forums, including the Arkansas Public Service Commission and the Manitoba Public Utilities Board, with associated matters and entities involved. It includes references to energy efficiency plans, tariff applications, and acquisition approvals.

- Q. Please state your name, title, and employer. - A. Ms. Napoleon: My name is Alice Napoleon. I am a Principal Associate at - Synapse Energy Economics ("Synapse"), located at 485 Massachusetts Avenue, - Cambridge, MA 02139. - A. Mr. Taka...

AI summary This text introduces two witnesses from Synapse Energy Economics, detailing their roles and expertise in energy regulation, policy analysis, and energy efficiency programs. The witnesses provide background on Synapse's work in electricity and gas industry regulation, planning, and analysis.

11 Table 4. Settlement Plan vs. 2024 IRP savings First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Energy Efficiency Demand Savings (MW) Settlement Plan (2023–2025) 412.7 78.8 Energy Efficiency Savings from 2020 IRP Reference Plan (2023–2025) 381 74 %...

AI summary Table 4 compares the energy savings of the Settlement Plan (2023–2025) with the 2024 IRP reference plan, showing an 8% increase in first-year energy savings and a 6% increase in peak energy efficiency demand savings.

9 Q. How does this budget compare to the savings of the prior three-year plan? 10 A. We show the budget for the Settlement Plan and the 2020–2022 Plan in [Table 7,](#page-11-2) 11 below.

AI summary The response directs to Table 7 for comparing the Settlement Plan's budget with the 2020–2022 Plan's savings, highlighting budgetary allocations across two distinct planning periods.

14 Q. How does this budget compare to investment for energy efficiency assumed 15 in the 2020 IRP? 16 A. We show the budget for the Settlement Plan and the investment in energy 17 efficiency in the 2020 IRP in [Table 8,](#page-12-0) below.

AI summary The response refers to Table 8 for comparing the Settlement Plan budget with energy efficiency investments in the 2020 IRP. The answer does not explicitly detail the comparison but directs to the table for specifics.

1 Table 8. Settlement Plan vs. 2024 IRP energy efficiency investment Budget ($ million) Settlement Plan (2023–2025) 173.0 EE Investment from 2020 IRP (2023–2025) 158.6 % Change 9.1 2

AI summary Table 8 compares the energy efficiency investment amounts between the Settlement Plan (2023–2025) and the 2024 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), showing a 9.1% increase in the Settlement Plan's budget.

- 3 Q. Please describe the lifetime and first-year cost of saved energy (COSE) for 4 the Settlement Plan. - 5 A. The lifetime COSE of the Settlement Plan is $0.035 per kWh, and the first-year 6 COSE is $0.39 per kWh (E1 Evidence, p. 10). -...

AI summary The Settlement Plan has a lifetime COSE of $0.035 per kWh and a first-year COSE of $0.39 per kWh. This is compared to U.S. energy efficiency programs with a weighted average cost of $0.024 per kWh saved (equivalent to $0.033 per kWh in 2022 Canadian dollars). The Settlement Plan's COSE is also compared to the Round 3 Modeling Preferred Plan in Table 9.

4 [Table 15](#page-22-1) provides the projected program costs for 2023–2025 including NSPI's 5 program costs. Most of the program costs increase by about 10 percent with 6 NSPI's costs while the costs for the EV Charging Control program an...

AI summary Table 15 outlines the projected program costs for 2023–2025, including NSPI's program costs. Most program costs are expected to increase by about 10 percent, while the EV Charging Control and CPP programs see much higher increases of 40 percent and 840 percent, respectively. E1 assumes that the majority of the CPP program cost will be borne by NSPI.

9 Q. Please describe your concern about E1's peak reduction estimates for the EV 10 charger control program. 11 Based on our review of NSPI's EV and associated load forecasts, we conclude 12 that E1's EV and associated peak load impacts fr...

AI summary The concern raised is about E1's peak reduction estimates for the EV charger control program being overly conservative. E1's estimate of 0.08 MW contrasts sharply with NSPI's range of 1.7 MW to 2.4 MW in 2025, based on different assumptions about EV load impacts.

TESTIMONY Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Docket No. M-2020-3020824) : Revised Direct Testimony of Alice Napoleon and Kenji Takahashi regarding PPL Electric Utilities' proposed Act 129 Phase IV Energy Efficiency and Conservation. O...

AI summary Testimonies by Alice Napoleon and others in multiple regulatory proceedings across jurisdictions, focusing on energy efficiency, demand-side management (DSM), and infrastructure projects. Testimonies were provided on behalf of organizations like the Natural Resources Defense Council and The Utility Reform Network, addressing proposals from utilities and regulatory bodies.

gree to $29,000 for those with post-secondary degrees. 8 In the 2016 census, the all Nova Scotian median income was $31,813 while it was only $15,498 in Mi'kmaw on-reserve communities. 9 Higher electrical usage when coupled with other dete...

AI summary The Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project (MHEEP) by EfficiencyOne aims to address energy poverty in Mi'kmaw communities through retrofits, but faces challenges like income disparities and funding cuts. Mi'kmaw households face higher energy costs and lower incomes, necessitating increased efficiency budgets. Program improvements include better reporting, training, and communication. COMFIT is referenced in a related proceeding.

1, including the incentive provided. E1 submits that given this methodology, it is very much focused on limiting incentive to the lowest level necessary to effect the desired result of measure uptake. Additionally, the 2023-2025 DSM Resour...

AI summary E1 argues its incentive methodology prioritizes minimizing incentives to achieve measure uptake. The 2023-2025 DSM Plan excludes savings from Net-to-Gross ratio calculations, and Mark Drazen testified E1 overlooked customer bill savings except in the Custom program. E1 clarifies it considers bill savings but uses thresholds for incentive comparisons in other programs.

1 Table 3: 2023 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2023 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available DR Capacity (MW) Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) d...

AI summary Table 3 outlines the 2023 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including residential and BNI energy efficiency programs, enabling strategies, and demand response initiatives. The table provides data on investment, benefits, energy savings, and cost ratios for various programs.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity and annual avoided CO₂e emissions were provided by NS Power, from the 2020 IRP using the Base level of DSM. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Power in 2021. Cost-...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs and emissions from energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs, citing data from NS Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2021 updates. It explains how cost-effectiveness ratios are calculated and highlights investment requirements for DR, including collaboration with NS Power and DERMS integration.

1 Table 4: 2024 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2024 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available DR Capacity (MW) our...

AI summary This table outlines the 2024 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, including energy efficiency programs, enabling strategies, and demand response initiatives. It details investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost ratios for various residential and business programs.

1 Table 5: 2025 DSM Resource Plan Investment and Savings 2025 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available DR Capacity (MW) our...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2025 DSM Resource Plan investment and savings, detailing various energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia. It includes data on investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost ratios for residential and business programs.

- 8 distribution infrastructure. [Figure 11,](#page-61-1) below, provides highlights of the Settlement Plan. 9 Figure 11: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan – Portfolio-level Insights Carbon Emissions Avoided First-Year CO2e Savings (kt) 326 Lifeti...

AI summary The Settlement Plan for 2023-2025 highlights significant carbon emissions avoided, energy and demand savings, and investment allocation, including a focus on low-income participation and the split of energy efficiency and demand response investments between RES and BNI.

3.1 SETTLEMENT PLAN – SAVINGS & INVESTMENT In 2023-2025, E1 will invest $173.0 million (in nominal dollars) to achieve 412.7 GWh of incremental cumulative net energy savings, 96.7 MW of cumulative system-peak demand savings (inclusive of b...

AI summary In 2023-2025, E1 plans to invest $173.0 million to achieve significant energy savings, including 412.7 GWh of incremental cumulative net energy savings and 96.7 MW of cumulative system-peak demand savings. The investment aims to reduce demand and increase DR capacity.

Table 8: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Average Dema Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity (MW) Total Re Cost Tes esource st (...

AI summary Table 8 presents the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, outlining annual investments, energy savings, demand reductions, and related costs. The table includes metrics such as lifetime benefits, energy savings, peak demand savings, and associated costs, providing a comprehensive overview of the plan's financial and operational impact.

1 Table 9: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023-2025 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity Test ( ource Cost (...

AI summary Table 9 outlines the investment and savings associated with various energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia from 2023 to 2025. It details program components, including residential and business initiatives, along with their respective investments, energy savings, and cost metrics.

7 Table 10: 2023 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2023 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity Test ( ource Cost (TRC) c Pr...

AI summary Table 10 outlines the 2023 Settlement Plan investment and savings by program component, detailing energy efficiency (EE) programs, enabling strategies (ES), and demand response (DR) programs. It provides data on investment amounts, energy savings, and cost metrics such as TRC and PAC across residential, business, and institutional sectors.

18 Estimates are based on current electricity emissions intensity and reductions in emissions intensity in accordance with Nova Scotia Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulations emissions caps, §4 (1) - avoided costs, including capacity, transmi...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs from demand response (DR) operations between 2023 and 2025, including capacity, transmission, and distribution benefits. It outlines the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as benefit/cost ratios, both excluding carbon for informational purposes. The analysis includes E1's planned participation by low-income customers.

11 Table 11: 2024 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2024 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Availabl...

AI summary This table outlines the investment and savings associated with various energy efficiency and demand response programs in Nova Scotia for 2024. It includes details on program components, investment amounts, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and other metrics.

Existing Residential, Efficient Product Rebates (BNI), and Direct Installation. 2025 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity (MW) Test ( ource Cost (TR...

AI summary The document presents a detailed table of energy efficiency and demand response programs, including investment, benefits, energy savings, and costs. It outlines various programs such as efficient product rebates, appliance retirement, and direct installation, along with their associated metrics and costs. The data includes both residential and business/non-profit programs and highlights the total benefits and costs across different initiatives.

3.3 SETTLEMENT PLAN – COST-EFFECTIVENESS - The cost effectiveness results for the Settlement Plan are shown below as part o[f Table 14,](#page-68-0) which provides - cost effectiveness results associated with the Settlement Plan, for both...

AI summary The Settlement Plan's cost-effectiveness is evaluated using the TRC and PAC tests. The TRC test is used for program-level decision-making at the NSUARB, while the PAC test focuses on utility-specific costs and benefits. The PAC test excludes carbon for informational purposes and considers the full program life for DR programs.

17 Table 14: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Cost Effectiveness Results by Program 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Total Resource Cost (TRC) Testa Program Administrator Cost (PAC) Testb Residential Energy Efficiency (EE) Programs Efficient Product Reb...

AI summary The 2023-2025 Settlement Plan outlines cost-effectiveness results for various energy efficiency programs. The table shows the Total Resource Cost (TRC) Test and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) Test for different residential and BNI programs, highlighting varying levels of cost effectiveness across different categories.

1 Table 15: Major Categories of Customer Segments, Dedicated Program Components & Other Support Category Description of Target Segment Dedicated Program Components Other Support & Resources Industrial includes businesses that produce goods...

AI summary Table 15 outlines major customer segments and their associated program components and support. The industrial segment includes businesses like aquaculture and agriculture, with dedicated programs such as Strategic Energy Management and Energy Management Information Systems, along with support like Industrial Energy Managers and OEMs.

17 and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Lifetime Energy Energy Savings Savings nergy Demand esource st (TRC) a excl. gram istrator st (PAC) b excl. Participation Lifetime Unit Cost ($ million) (GWh) (GWh)...

AI summary The document presents a table comparing investment, energy savings, resource costs, and participation metrics across different scenarios (Scenario 6 111, Settlement, and Alternate) from 2023 to 2025. It includes data on energy demand, carbon-related costs, and program administrator costs, with no variance noted from the Settlement scenario.

1 4.2.2.4 GREEN HEAT 6 9 - 2 The Green Heat program component is externally marketed as Heating System Rebates. Through this - 3 offering, Nova Scotians can apply for post-purchase rebates for high-efficiency space and water heating - 4 sy...

AI summary The Green Heat program, marketed as Heating System Rebates, offers post-purchase rebates for high-efficiency and renewable-fueled heating systems. It aims to encourage the installation of efficient heating solutions, including those powered by solar and biomass. Table 27 summarizes the program's three-year investment, energy savings, demand savings, target market, and key components.

Program Component History & Highlights - 2013 modified initial natural gas fuel switching scope to focus on switching to fuel derived from renewable sources; program component retitled to Green Heat - 2015 incorporated solar thermal rebate...

AI summary The document outlines the evolution of a program component, detailing key changes from 2013 to 2021, including modifications to fuel switching scope, incorporation of solar thermal rebates, changes in delivery models, introduction of new demand management measures, and adjustments in response to the pandemic.

7 Table 28: Three-Year Summary of the Home Energy Assessment Program Component Investment Energy Savings Demand Savings Participation Program Component History & Highlights • windows, doors, and skylights • 2000s – incentives offered throu...

AI summary This table provides a three-year summary of the Home Energy Assessment Program component, highlighting key historical developments, including changes in eligible measures, introduction of financing options, adjustments to rebates, and program redesigns in response to customer feedback and external initiatives like the federal Greener Homes initiative.

1 Table 30: Three-Year Summary of the Residential Behaviour Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (homes) 2023 Total 1.1 8.7 38,195 Low-income 0.13 0.96 n/a 4,240 2024 Total 2....

AI summary This chunk presents a three-year summary of the Residential Behaviour Program Component, outlining investments, energy and demand savings, and participation numbers. It highlights market barriers such as awareness, accessibility, and lack of information, as well as program enhancements including personalized energy-use feedback and integration with demand response (DR) programming. The program is a re-introduction of a component first offered by E1 in 2013-2015.

2 Scenario Scenario Year First-Year Energy Investment Savings 0, Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a gram rator Cost (PAC) b Participation Participation Participation Lifetime Unit ($ million) (GWh) (GWh) Savings (MW) incl. Carbon excl. Carbo...

AI summary The document presents a table comparing energy investment savings, participation, and costs under different scenarios (Settlement and Alternate) for the years 2023 to 2025. It includes metrics such as first-year energy investment savings, total resource cost test, participation numbers, and variances between scenarios. The data is expressed in nominal dollars and includes percentages of variance from the settlement scenario.

4.3.1.1 NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM COMPONENT Since its adoption in 2011, the New Home Construction program component has provided support, education, and incentives to the building industry in Nova Scotia. The program has been successfu...

AI summary The New Home Construction program component, established in 2011, has supported residential new construction energy efficiency in Nova Scotia. However, due to reduced savings from increased heat pump usage, the program is being phased out and replaced with a new market transformation initiative under Enabling Strategies.

Table 34: Three-Year Summary of the New Home Construction Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (homes) 2023 Total 0.8 0.4 1.3 419 2024 Total n/a n/a n/a n/a 2025 Total n/a n/a...

AI summary Table 34 provides a three-year summary of the New Home Construction Program Component, showing investment, energy savings, demand savings, and participation for 2023. Data for 2024 and 2025 is not available, and the table references Attachment 4 for more details on the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan.

19 Table 35: 2023-2025 New Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Demand Savings - gram strator st (PAC) b Participation (homes) c Lifetime Unit Cost ($/kWh) d ($ million) (GWh)...

AI summary Table 35 outlines the 2023-2025 New Residential Performance Indicators, including investment, energy savings, demand savings, and participation metrics. The data shows a total investment of $0.8 million, with energy savings and demand savings figures for 2023 and projected values for 2024 and 2025.

12 Table 38: Summary of Benefits – Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) Participant Benefits Industry Benefits Environmental Benefits Strategic DSM Portfolio Benefits • utility bill savings and improved building comfort • reduced maintenance an...

AI summary Table 38 outlines the benefits of the Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) program, highlighting participant, industry, environmental, and strategic DSM portfolio benefits. It includes utility bill savings, reduced GHG emissions, support for local economic development, and alignment with provincial and federal incentives.

Table 39: Three-Year Summary of the Business Energy Rebates Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (products) Market Barriers • Upfront costs: the higher priced energy efficient...

AI summary Table 39 outlines the Business Energy Rebates Program, highlighting market barriers such as upfront costs, lack of knowledge, and time constraints. It also details key components like accessible rebates and product-level expertise. Eligible measures include energy efficiency upgrades across various sectors, such as agriculture, heating, lighting, and refrigeration.

17 Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Total Reso Test ( - incl. Carbon Administ gram rator Cost (PAC) b \nexcl. Carbon Participation (product...

AI summary The table presents energy savings, investment, and cost data for different scenarios (Settlement and Alternate) across multiple years. It includes metrics such as energy savings, peak demand savings, and administrative costs, with comparisons and variances between the scenarios.

• utility bill savings and improved building comfort • reduced maintenance and extended equipment life • access to energy expertise through funded studies and on-site energy manager support • improved control over buildings and industrial...

AI summary The table outlines the benefits of the BNI Custom Incentive Program, including utility bill savings, improved building comfort, reduced maintenance, and environmental benefits such as lower GHG emissions. It also highlights market transformation, relationship building, and support for innovative projects.

13 Custom has criteria to determine what types of facilities, projects, measures, and costs are eligible. These 14 criteria ensure the program works the way it is intended and that E1 only pays incentives for actions that 15 generate incre...

AI summary The Custom program component has specific criteria to ensure eligibility for energy efficiency and demand response initiatives, ensuring that E1 only pays for actions that generate incremental energy savings. The program also allows for integration of EE and DR programming for cost efficiencies and ease of participation. Table 45 summarizes the three-year investment, energy savings, demand savings, target market, and key components of the Custom program.

21 Table 45: Three-Year Summary of the Custom Program Component Annual Plan Investment Energy Savings Demand Savings Participation ($M) (GWh) (MW) (projects) 2023 Total 7.3 22.3 4.7 257 Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Dema...

AI summary Table 45 presents a three-year summary of the Custom Program Component, including investment, energy savings, demand savings, and participation across 257 projects from 2023.

22 Table 46: Three-Year Summary of the SEM & EMIS Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (participants) 2023 Total 0.9 2.7 0.3 8 2024 Total 0.9 2.7 0.3 8 2025 Total 0.9 2.7 0.3...

AI summary This table summarizes the SEM & EMIS program component over three years, highlighting investment, energy savings, demand savings, and participation. It also identifies market barriers, such as upfront costs, internal competition for capital, and long payback periods, which hinder the adoption of energy efficiency initiatives by industrial customers.

5.2.3.1 PROGRAM DELIVERY - The Custom Incentives program structure is designed to overcome customer barriers associated with large - upfront costs, lack of in-house capacity and business case requirements. The program is delivered through...

AI summary The Custom Incentives program is structured to address customer barriers through a combination of E1 staff, contractors, and third parties. It includes services like Retrofit, NC, BOpt, EMIS, and SEM, each tailored to support energy efficiency initiatives with varying incentives, eligibility criteria, and implementation processes.

13 Table 50: Three-Year Summary of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (products) 2023 Total 6.4 11.9 2.5 106,189 Low-income 0.11 0.48 0.1...

AI summary This table summarizes the Small Business Energy Solutions Program over three years (2023-2025), showing investment, energy savings, demand savings, and participation. It also outlines the target market and barriers, including affordability, awareness, and resource limitations.

Table 51: 2023-2025 Direct Installation Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) b Participation (products) c Lifetime Unit ($ millio...

AI summary Table 51 outlines performance indicators for direct installation programs from 2023 to 2025, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs. The table provides data on first-year and lifetime energy savings, as well as participation and cost metrics.

19 5.3.5 PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES 20 The Direct Installation program does not vary between the Alternate Scenario and Settlement Plan – as 21 summarized in Table 53, below. & lt;sup>a TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to...

AI summary The Direct Installation program remains unchanged between the Alternate Scenario and Settlement Plan. The text defines key metrics such as TRC (Total Resource Cost), PAC (Participant Cost), and lifetime unit cost, which are used to evaluate the program's effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis.

1 Table 53: Direct Installation Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment Energy Energ Lifetime Energy Savings Energy Demand Control Savings (GWh) (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (...

AI summary Table 53 compares the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario for Direct Installation Performance Indicators, showing differences in investment, energy savings, and costs across years 2023 to 2025. The Alternate Scenario shows higher investment and energy savings but similar total resource costs and participant costs compared to the Settlement Plan.

1 7. ENABLING STRATEGIES - 2 E1 has delivered energy efficiency and conservation programs through annual and/or three-year DSM Plan 3 cycles since 2010. Beginning with the development of its first DSM Plan for the 2012 program year, E1 has...

AI summary Enabling Strategies have been a key part of E1's DSM Portfolio since 2012, contributing to capacity building in Nova Scotia's energy efficiency industry. E1 has invested an average of 10% of its DSM Portfolio in Enabling Strategies, which includes Education and Outreach, Development and Research, and Other Enabling Strategies. The focus has shifted over time from Education and Outreach to innovation, research, and development to support future programming.

Scenario Analysis The DR analysis produced MW savings and costs for two scenarios, which are the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario. These align with the scenarios in the EE analysis and use the EE analysis results for the baseline pea...

AI summary The scenario analysis compares the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario, focusing on DR savings and costs. The Alternate Scenario assumes lower DR incentives, lower enrollment, and excludes certain DR suboptions tied to EE measures and EV Charging Control, as well as Behavioural DR.

Table 16. BNI Curtailment Option Characteristics Item Description E1 will offer the BNI Curtailment option to Large C&I and Interruptible customers. • Customers agree to reduce load by a fixed contracted amount when events are called; enro...

AI summary The BNI Curtailment option is offered to Large C&I and Interruptible customers under E1, allowing them to reduce load by a fixed amount during events. Customers are paid based on contracted load reduction, and load reductions are achieved through various end uses. The program includes both in-house delivery and aggregator-managed approaches, with rebates for advanced lighting controls and assistance with EMCS installation.

more complex markets and projects – as a result, the historically low first year unit costs of DSM cannot be maintained. Despite the resulting increasing unit costs, the Settlement Plan remains cost effective and demand side management con...

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines Nova Scotia Power's (E1) demand side management (DSM) strategies for 2023-2025, emphasizing cost-effectiveness, program enhancements, and support for decarbonization goals. It highlights the TRC and PAC ratios, and aims to improve accessibility and achieve deeper energy savings.

1.3 THE NEXT DECADE OF DSM Nova Scotians have been achieving considerable energy, cost, and emissions savings through energy efficiency over the past ten years. But the current climate outlook requires further transition to clean energy re...

AI summary Nova Scotians have made progress in energy efficiency over the past decade, but more action is needed in the next ten years due to climate and energy demands. E1 faces challenges in DSM planning as the market evolves, particularly with residential sector changes and the need to meet efficiency targets set by the 2020 IRP. The Settlement Plan aims to address gaps caused by pandemic impacts and ensure benefits are realized.

ers achieve cost-effective energy solutions; - providing accessibility for a wider variety of market sectors and customer segments; and - increasing the level of system-peak demand reduction benefits. E1 considers affordability in the deve...

AI summary E1's Settlement Plan focuses on achieving cost-effective energy solutions, improving accessibility, and increasing system-peak demand reduction. The plan includes energy efficiency, demand response, and enabling strategies, with a payback period of under five years. It is expected to offset significant energy production and reduce system-peak demand, providing substantial lifetime benefits.

4 Table 3: Balanced Plan Aspects Addressed in the Settlement Plan Balanced Plan Aspects 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Short- and long-term energy and capacity avoidance • resource acquisition (measures with a diversity of short- and long-term...

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines balanced aspects of energy and capacity avoidance, program delivery costs, avoided investments, non-electric benefits, and diversity in program delivery. It includes strategies for resource acquisition, incentive setting, and measure diversity across various customer segments and delivery types.

1 Table 4: Key Global Assumptions in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development Key Global Assumptions Model • Avoided cost of carbon was developed using the Federal Policy Position13 Document, inclusive of the federal backstop trajectory (...

AI summary The document discusses key global assumptions in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development, including the avoided cost of carbon based on federal policy and updated line loss factors for residential and BNI sectors, derived from E1's 2020 DSM Program Evaluation Report.

2.3.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE MODELLING PROCESS - The modelling process, and its associated software tools, were used to support the quantitative - development of the Settlement Plan for both EE and DR. Modelling and software tools support the -...

AI summary The modelling process was used to support the quantitative development of the Settlement Plan for Energy Efficiency (EE) and Demand Response (DR). It provides detailed cost-effectiveness impacts, energy and demand impacts, participation estimates, and investment views to support regulatory processes and performance targets.

2.3.3.1 PHASE 1 – MODEL CONFIGURATION - The model configuration process involves the initial configuration of the modelling tools associated with - the Settlement Plan development: - 1. the DRSim™ model, which models DR activities within t...

AI summary Phase 1 of the model configuration process involves setting up the DRSim™ and ProCESS™ models for the Settlement Plan, including adjusting parameters like cost-effectiveness testing and administrative cost methodologies, as well as inputting initial assumptions such as avoided costs and electricity retail rates.

1 3. 2023-2025 SETTLEMENT PLAN 2 The 2023-2025 Settlement Plan represents a comprehensive suite of programs and service offerings for 3 Nova Scotia electricity customers. The main goal of each energy efficiency program is to eliminate ener...

AI summary The 2023-2025 Settlement Plan outlines a range of energy efficiency and demand response programs aimed at reducing energy waste, lowering costs for customers, and supporting environmental compliance by reducing GHG emissions. It also seeks to provide flexible capacity to the utility during peak times, potentially reducing the need for new generation and transmission infrastructure.

8 distribution infrastructure. [Figure 11,](#page-114-1) below, provides highlights of the Settlement Plan. Carbon Emissions Avoided First-Year CO2e Savings (kt) 326 Lifetime CO2e Savings (kt) 1,742 Portfolio Summary (2023-2025) First-Year...

AI summary The Settlement Plan outlines distribution infrastructure initiatives with significant carbon emissions reductions, energy savings, and investment allocations. It highlights first-year and lifetime energy and demand savings, investment breakdowns, and cost-benefit analyses, including a focus on low-income participation and energy efficiency measures.

3.1 SETTLEMENT PLAN - SAVINGS & INVESTMENT 10 In 2023-2025, E1 will invest $173.0 million (in nominal dollars) to achieve 412.7 GWh of incremental 11 cumulative net energy savings, 96.7 MW of cumulative system-peak demand savings (inclusiv...

AI summary E1 plans to invest $173 million from 2023 to 2025 to achieve significant energy savings, including 412.7 GWh of incremental net energy savings and 96.7 MW of system-peak demand savings. The investment includes demand reductions and DR capacity additions, with detailed program budgets and targets outlined in Table 8.

16 2023 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity (MW) city Test (TRC) c Test (PAC) d EE Portfolio Total (EE + ES) 51.5 171.1 172.4 120.7 1,502 26.9 - 2....

AI summary The table outlines investment and savings data for energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs in 2023. It includes metrics such as investment, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and test results for the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC) tests.

Table 11: 2024 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2024 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Available D...

AI summary Table 11 outlines the 2024 Settlement Plan investment and savings by program component, including details on energy efficiency programs, their associated investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and costs. The table includes various initiatives such as efficient product rebates, appliance retirement, and home energy assessments.

- 17 and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings esource st (TRC) a excl. gram istrator st (PAC) b excl. Participation Lifetime Unit ($ minon) (GWh) (GWh...

AI summary The document presents a table comparing energy efficiency and conservation scenarios, including investment amounts, energy savings, peak demand savings, and carbon emissions across different years. It includes a 'Settlement' and 'Alternate' scenario with data for 2023, 2024, and 2025, along with variance percentages from the settlement scenario.

Table 26: Three-Year Summary of the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project Program Component Annual Plan24 Investment Energy Savings Demand Savings Participation ($M) (GWh) (MW) (products) (homes) 2023 Total 1.2 0.5 0.2 130 118 2024 Total...

AI summary The Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project is a low-income program targeting Mi'kmaw communities, focusing on energy efficiency upgrades and education. It addresses barriers such as affordability, awareness, and resource limitations, and includes measures like home energy assessments, heating systems, and appliance replacements. The program has evolved from a pilot initiative into a standalone component under the DSM Resource Plan.

Table 31: 2023-2025 Existing Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings 0, 0 Javings Total Re Cost Tes esource st (TRC) a Admini gram strator st (PAC) b Participation (products) c Participation (homes) d P...

AI summary Table 31 presents performance indicators for residential energy efficiency programs from 2023 to 2025, including investment, energy savings, participation metrics, and costs. The data shows increasing investment and energy savings over the years, with consistent participation in programs and a stable lifetime unit cost of 0.05 \/kWh.

29 Scenario Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings ource Cost (TRC) a Administr gram rator Cost PAC) b Participation Participation Participation Lifetime Unit ($ million) (GWh) (GWh) (MW) incl...

AI summary The text presents a table comparing investment, energy savings, and costs across different scenarios (Settlement and Alternate) for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. The data includes metrics such as first-year and lifetime energy savings, participation numbers, and total resource costs (TRC). The table also includes variances from the Settlement scenario for each year and overall totals.

8 Table 36: 2023-2025 New Residential Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW)...

AI summary Table 36 compares the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario for 2023-2025 residential performance indicators, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs. The data shows no variance between the scenarios for most metrics, with identical values for investment, energy savings, and costs across years.

Table 40: 2023-2025 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment 0, Lifetime Energy Savings O Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) b Participation (products) c Lifetime Unit Cost ($...

AI summary Table 40 outlines the performance indicators for the 2023-2025 BNI Efficient Product Rebates program, including investment amounts, energy savings, participation metrics, and cost tests such as Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC). The data provides a breakdown of performance across three years and highlights changes in metrics such as energy savings and participation.

5.1.5 PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES The Efficient Product Rebates Program features a modestly lower amount of participation, with marginally lower incentives, in the 2025 Plan year. This is due to an incentive increase applied within the Settlement...

AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates Program in the 2025 Plan year has a modestly lower participation level and slightly lower incentives compared to the Settlement Plan, which is expected to result in higher energy and demand savings in the final year of the 2023-2025 DSM Plan period.

- 3 Table 47: 2023-2025 Custom Incentives Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings esource st (TRC)ª gram strator st (PAC) b Participation (projects) c Participation (part...

AI summary Table 47 outlines the performance indicators for custom incentives from 2023 to 2025, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs. The data shows a steady increase in investment and energy savings over the three-year period, with consistent unit costs and participation metrics.

1 Table 48: Custom Incentives Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment First-Year Lifetime Energy Energy Savings Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a gra...

AI summary Table 48 compares the performance indicators of the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario for custom incentives, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, total resource cost, and participation metrics across 2023 to 2025. The Alternate Scenario shows slightly higher investment and participation but similar energy and demand savings compared to the Settlement Plan.

1 Table 49: Summary of Benefits – Direct Installation Participant Industry Benefits Environmental Strategic DSM Portfolio Benefits Benefits Benefits • utility bill savings and improved building comfort reduced maintenance costs • reduced m...

AI summary Table 49 outlines the benefits of the Direct Installation program, highlighting industry benefits such as utility bill savings and reduced maintenance costs, environmental benefits like reduced GHG emissions, and strategic DSM portfolio benefits including access to hard-to-reach customers and increased public awareness of energy efficiency opportunities.

9 5.3.2.1 SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY SOLUTIONS PROGRAM COMPONENT - 10 The Small Business Energy Solutions program component provides small business customers access to - 11 technical assistance and financial incentives for the installation of e...

AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions program component offers technical assistance and financial incentives to small businesses for energy efficiency upgrades. It includes self-directed and facilitated pathways, with the latter involving energy audits. The program provides prescriptive and customized incentives and is detailed in Table 50 of the Settlement Plan.

1 Table 51: 2023-2025 Direct Installation Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) b Participation (products) c Lifetime Unit ($ mill...

AI summary Table 51 outlines the 2023-2025 Direct Installation Performance Indicators, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost metrics. The table provides data for each year and a total across the three-year period, with metrics such as energy savings in GWh and peak demand savings in MW.

6.6 PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES - E1 engaged Guidehouse in the development of both the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario. In order to develop the DR Alternate Scenario, the following adjustments were made: - EV charging and DR Behavioural pa...

AI summary E1 engaged Guidehouse to develop the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario for the DR program, making several adjustments such as removing certain pathways, reducing incentives, and adjusting program components to achieve an Alternate Scenario of 8.3 MW and $5.5 million.

13 Table 61: Three-Year Summary of the Development & Research Component of Enabling Strategies Annual Plan Investment ($M) 2023 Total 1.5 2024 Total 1.5 2025 Total 1.5 Innovation & Emerging Technologies: driving participation and uptake th...

AI summary The table outlines a three-year investment plan for the Development & Research Component of Enabling Strategies, focusing on areas such as innovation, market research, beneficial electrification, locational DSM efforts, market transformation, and data analytics. Annual investments are set at $1.5M for 2023, 2024, and 2025.

7.3.3.5 MARKET TRANSFORMATION In 2023-2025, E1 will place increased emphasis on activities that help to redefine the market for energy efficiency through market transformation and customer education. Market transformation is a high-level f...

AI summary E1 will focus on market transformation and customer education from 2023-2025 to redefine the energy efficiency market. This includes aligning regulations with federal standards, improving building code compliance, and promoting energy-efficient technologies like heat pumps. E1 will also collaborate with various organizations and governments to support these initiatives.

10. CONCLUSION - The Settlement Plan is responsive to the climate emergency and helps advance recent environmental goals - preparing for the future. The Settlement Plan positions E1 to achieve levels of DSM in the future and is a - transit...

AI summary The Settlement Plan addresses the climate emergency, expands accessibility and equity, and is cost-effective, delivering significant benefits to ratepayers. It includes increased energy efficiency targets, supports underserved communities, and reflects stakeholder input, aligning with the goal of achieving net zero by 2050.

GENERAL .................................... 1 27. SURVIVAL 17 2 3 List of Schedules 4 5 Schedule "A": Electricity Efficiency And Conservation Activities 6 Schedule "B": Compensation 7 Schedule "C": Performance Requirements 8 Schedule "D":...

AI summary The document outlines schedules related to electricity efficiency and conservation activities, compensation, performance requirements, confidentiality agreements, and an approved EECA plan. It also defines a 'Business Day' as Monday to Friday, excluding holidays in Nova Scotia.

5 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities 6 7 The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3 year Cumulative Annual Energy 8 Savings, Cumulative Annual Peak Demand Savings, Cumulative Annual Energy Savings 9 from Low Income...

AI summary The text discusses the scope of savings from electricity efficiency and conservation activities, including cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings, and available demand response capacity over a three-year plan associated with EECAs.

EFFICIENCYONE 2023-2025 DSM PLAN COMPLIANCE FILING Appendix F D – Supply Agreement 97 vii. Total spending (reported by program and rate class); 98 viii. Customer satisfaction; and 99 ix. Incidental cumulative annual energy savings applicab...

AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Plan Compliance Filing, including a confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated. The agreement covers the handling of confidential information in accordance with the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Act and the Public Utilities Act of Nova Scotia.

- (d) " Consequential Losses " means consequential, special, incidental, multiple, exemplary or punitive damages including lost profits, whether such claim of lost profits is categorized as indirect, direct or consequential damages or unde...

AI summary The text defines key legal and contractual terms, including consequential losses, contract documents, the EECA Plan, and environmental laws. It outlines the scope of Force Majeure Events and excludes certain circumstances from their application.

25. COORDINATION MEETINGS AND REPORTS - 25.1 During the Term of this Agreement, EfficiencyOne shall prepare and deliver to the UARB and NSPI a quarterly report (the " Quarterly Report ") in a form acceptable to the UARB. - 25.2 EfficiencyO...

AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to provide quarterly and annual reports to the UARB and NSPI detailing the progress of the EECA, including milestones, financial statements, and evaluations. Regular coordination meetings between NSPI and EfficiencyOne are mandated to ensure effective planning and alignment with the EECA Plan.

27. SURVIVAL 27.1 Subject to the provisions of the Act, all provisions of this Agreement which by their express terms or nature are continuing shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, without limitation, th...

AI summary This section outlines that certain provisions of the Agreement, including those related to the EECA Plan, covenants, confidentiality, indemnity, intellectual property, and general provisions, will continue to apply even after the Agreement's expiration or termination.

4 Schedule A 6 5 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities The figure below identifies the scope of savings (3 year Cumulative Annual Energy Savings, Cumulative Annual Peak Demand Savings, Cumulative Annual Energy Savings from Low...

AI summary This section outlines the scope of savings from Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECAs) over a three-year plan, including cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings, and demand response capacity, specifically highlighting savings from low-income programs.

Permitted Scope of Use 2. The Recipient may use the Confidential Information solely for the purposes of providing or receiving EECA, as the case may be, in accordance with the Legislation and the Supply Agreement and for no other reason or...

AI summary The Recipient is permitted to use Confidential Information solely for providing or receiving EECA, in accordance with the Legislation and the Supply Agreement, and for no other purpose.

ver $130 million in annual electricity costs (accounting for DSM cost recovery)[1](#page-47-1) and over 775 kilotonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually through a variety of programs and services. E1's Settlement Plan is an investment o...

AI summary The document highlights the benefits of demand side management (DSM) in Nova Scotia, noting that past DSM programs have provided ratepayers with benefits exceeding utility investments by over 4 to 1. The Settlement Plan, a $173 million investment, is expected to deliver $545 million in lifetime benefits, with a payback period of less than five years. The plan addresses the maturation of the electricity efficiency market and the need to shift focus to more complex energy efficiency opportunities.

1.3 THE NEXT DECADE OF DSM Nova Scotians have been achieving considerable energy, cost, and emissions savings through energy efficiency over the past ten years. But the current climate outlook requires further transition to clean energy re...

AI summary Nova Scotians have made significant energy efficiency progress over the past decade, but more action is needed due to the current climate outlook. The 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) requires 2,800 GWh of efficiency by 2045, but progress has lagged due to the impacts of the pandemic. The Settlement Plan aims to make up this lost ground and support future energy efficiency and climate goals.

8 2.1.3 CUSTOMER INSIGHTS 9 As part of the development of its Settlement Plan, E1 commissioned Narrative Research to undertake a 10 quantitative research study to assess perceptions on a variety of topics related to energy efficiency and c...

AI summary E1 commissioned a survey to understand Nova Scotians' perceptions of energy efficiency and conservation. The survey revealed high brand awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia but low engagement with Energy Solutions Advisors. Cost barriers and the need for education were identified as key issues, with participants supporting DSM initiatives for their climate and energy benefits.

ers achieve cost-effective energy solutions; - providing accessibility for a wider variety of market sectors and customer segments; and - increasing the level of system-peak demand reduction benefits. E1 considers affordability in the deve...

AI summary The Settlement Plan focuses on achieving cost-effective energy solutions, increasing accessibility for various market sectors, and reducing system-peak demand. It includes energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), and Enabling Strategies, with a payback period under five years. The plan is expected to offset 4,600 GWh of energy production and reduce annual system-peak demand by 97 MW, providing lifetime benefits of $542 million.

14 Table 3: Balanced Plan Aspects Addressed in the Settlement Plan Balanced Plan Aspects 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Short- and long-term energy and capacity avoidance • resource acquisition (measures with a diversity of short- and long-term...

AI summary Table 3 outlines the balanced plan aspects addressed in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan, including energy and capacity avoidance, program delivery costs, avoided investments, and non-electric and non-energy benefits. It highlights strategies such as resource acquisition, market transformation, cost management, and incentive setting.

7 Table 4: Key Global Assumptions in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development Key Global Assumptions Model ITEM DESCRIPTION OF MODEL INPUTS & ASSUMPTIONS EE DR • Avoided costs of both energy and capacity were based on NS Power's 2020 IRP...

AI summary The document outlines key global assumptions in the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Development, including avoided costs based on NS Power's 2020 IRP Scenario 2.0C, transmission and distribution avoided costs developed by NS Power and the DSMAG, and avoided costs of carbon using the Federal Policy Position with a carbon price of $170 per tonne by 2030.

2.3.3.1 PHASE 1 – MODEL CONFIGURATION - The model configuration process involves the initial configuration of the modelling tools associated with the Settlement Plan development: - 1. the DRSim™ model, which models DR activities within the...

AI summary Phase 1 of the model configuration process involves setting up the DRSim™ and ProCESS™ models for the Settlement Plan. This includes adjusting parameters related to cost-effectiveness testing, administrative costs, and inputting initial assumptions like avoided costs and electricity retail rates.

1 3. 2023-2025 SETTLEMENT PLAN 2 The 2023-2025 Settlement Plan represents a comprehensive suite of programs and service offerings for 3 Nova Scotia electricity customers. The main goal of each energy efficiency program is to eliminate ener...

AI summary The 2023-2025 Settlement Plan outlines a range of energy efficiency and demand response programs aimed at reducing energy waste, lowering costs for customers, and decreasing GHG emissions. These programs also aim to provide flexible capacity to the utility during peak times, potentially reducing the need for new infrastructure.

8 distribution infrastructure. [Figure 11,](#page-83-1) below, provides highlights of the Settlement Plan. 9 Figure 11: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan – Portfolio-level Insights Carbon Emissions Avoided First-Year CO2e Savings (kt) 326 Lifetime...

AI summary The Settlement Plan for 2023-2025 outlines key metrics such as carbon emissions avoided, energy savings, peak demand reductions, and investment allocations. It highlights a focus on energy efficiency and demand response programs, with a significant portion of investment directed toward low-income initiatives.

3.1 SETTLEMENT PLAN - SAVINGS & INVESTMENT 10 In 2023-2025, E1 will invest $173.0 million (in nominal dollars) to achieve 412.7 GWh of incremental 11 cumulative net energy savings, 96.7 MW of cumulative system-peak demand savings (inclusiv...

AI summary The document outlines a settlement plan for energy savings and investment from 2023 to 2025, with E1 investing $173.0 million to achieve significant energy and demand savings. The plan includes both cumulative and lifetime savings targets.

Table 8: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings Year Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average Measure Life (years) Peak EE Demand Savings Availabl...

AI summary Table 8 outlines the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, detailing annual investments, energy savings, and cost metrics for energy efficiency and demand response programs. It includes data on energy savings, peak demand reductions, and resource costs over the three-year period.

Annual avoided costs of energy and capacity and annual avoided CO₂e emissions were provided by NS Power, from the 2020 IRP using the Base level of DSM for Scenario 2.0C. Avoided costs of transmission and distribution were provided by NS Po...

AI summary The text discusses avoided costs and CO₂e emissions from energy and capacity programs, using data provided by NS Power from the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It also explains cost-effectiveness ratios and various metrics like TRC and PAC, which compare benefits and costs of energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs over their lifetimes.

$ million) First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity (MW) ource Cost (TRC) c Prog Administr Test ( ator Cost

AI summary The text presents a table outlining the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings by Program Component, including metrics such as first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, available demand response capacity, total resource cost, program administrator cost, and weighted-average cost of capital.

7 Table 10: 2023 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component Residential (Res) Energy Efficiency (EE) Programs Efficient Product Rebates 4.0 9.1 10.9 8.3 1.2 - 1.1 0.7 2.3 1.4 Appliance Retrement 1.0 0.7 1.2 5 0.2 0.9 0.5...

AI summary Table 10 outlines the 2023 Settlement Plan investment and savings by program component, including residential energy efficiency programs, appliance retirement, instant savings, and other initiatives aimed at improving energy efficiency and affordability in Nova Scotia.

11 Table 11: 2024 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings, by Program Component 2024 Investment a ($ million) Lifetime Benefits b ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak EE Demand Savings (MW) Availabl...

AI summary Table 11 outlines the 2024 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings by Program Component, detailing investments, benefits, energy savings, and costs for various energy efficiency, enabling strategies, and demand response programs in Nova Scotia.

Existing Residential, Efficient Product Rebates (BNI), and Direct Installation. 2025 Investment a Lifetime Benefits b First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity ource Cost (TRC) c Prog Ad...

AI summary The document presents a detailed breakdown of various energy efficiency and demand response programs, including their investments, benefits, energy savings, and cost ratios. It highlights the performance of residential, BNI, and direct installation programs, along with enabling strategies and demand response initiatives.

27 Table 23: Summary of Benefits – Existing Residential Participant Industry Benefits Environmental Strategic DSM Portfolio Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • utility bill savings and increased sales of reduced GHG strengthened relationshi...

AI summary This table outlines the benefits of the existing residential energy efficiency and demand response programs. It highlights industry benefits, environmental impacts, and strategic DSM portfolio advantages, including reduced GHG emissions, improved home comfort, and partnerships with Mi'kmaw communities.

9 Table 25: Three-Year Summary of the Efficient Product Installation Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings Demand Savings (GWh) Participation (products) Enhancements in 2023-2025 Electrician-installed measures that e...

AI summary The Efficient Product Installation Program Component outlines enhancements from 2023 to 2025, including electrician-installed measures like occupancy sensors, lighting controls, and smart thermostats for electric heating systems, aiming to improve energy efficiency and demand response integration.

4.3.1.1 NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM COMPONENT Since its adoption in 2011, the New Home Construction program component has provided support, education, and incentives to the building industry in Nova Scotia. The program has been successfu...

AI summary The New Home Construction program component, established in 2011, has supported energy efficiency in residential new construction in Nova Scotia. However, due to reduced savings from increased heat pump use, the program will be wound up and replaced with a new market transformation program. Incentives were performance-based and aimed to encourage energy-efficient home construction.

19 Table 35: 2023-2025 New Residential Performance Indicators Year Investment First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) a Administrator Participation (homes) c Lifetime Unit Cost (...

AI summary Table 35 outlines the 2023-2025 New Residential Performance Indicators, showing investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and participation metrics. The data includes total resource cost tests and lifetime unit costs for residential energy efficiency programs.

Table 36: 2023-2025 New Residential Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) e...

AI summary Table 36 compares the Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario for 2023-2025 residential performance indicators, including investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and costs. The table shows no variance between the two scenarios for 2023, with identical values across all metrics.

Table 39: Three-Year Summary of the Business Energy Rebates Program Component Annual Plan Investment ($M) Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Participation (products) 2023 Total 7.4 35.3 6.7 207,143 Low-income 0.09 0.47 0.12 2,738 202...

AI summary Table 39 provides a three-year summary of the Business Energy Rebates Program Component, outlining annual investments, energy and demand savings, and participation numbers. The program targets existing and new construction in Nova Scotia, including businesses, non-profit, and institutional facilities.

Table 40: 2023-2025 BNI Efficient Product Rebates Performance Indicators Year Investment 0, Lifetime Energy Savings O Cost Test (PAC) Participation (products) c Lifetime Unit ($ million) (GWh) (GWh) (MW) incl. excl. incl. excl. (p. caacts)...

AI summary Table 40 outlines performance indicators for the BNI Efficient Product Rebates from 2023 to 2025, including investment amounts, energy savings, participation metrics, and cost tests. The table provides data on investment, energy savings, participation, and cost per kilowatt-hour over the three-year period.

13 Table 42: Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) Performance Indicators – Comparison of Settlement Plan and Alternate Scenario Year Investment ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Resource Cos...

AI summary The table compares the performance indicators of the Efficient Product Rebates (BNI) program under the Settlement Plan and Alternate scenarios, showing differences in investment, energy savings, peak demand savings, and cost metrics across years 2023 to 2025.

• utility bill savings and improved building comfort • reduced maintenance and extended equipment life • access to energy expertise through funded studies and on-site energy manager support • improved control over buildings and industrial...

AI summary The table outlines the benefits of the Custom Incentives program, including utility bill savings, improved building comfort, reduced maintenance, extended equipment life, access to energy expertise, and environmental benefits such as reduced GHG emissions. It also highlights market transformation, relationship building, and support for innovative projects.

21 Table 45: Three-Year Summary of the Custom Program Component Annual Plan Investment Energy Savings Demand Savings Participation Key Components • approach. • savings. • Retrofit: help to conduct scoping and feasibility studies; and assis...

AI summary The document outlines the Custom Program Component, which provides tailored financial and technical assistance for energy efficiency initiatives. It includes support for feasibility studies, energy modeling, and implementing cost-effective efficiency projects in both new and existing buildings.

1 7. ENABLING STRATEGIES 2 E1 has delivered energy efficiency and conservation programs through annual and/or three-year DSM Plan 3 cycles since 2010. Beginning with the development of its first DSM Plan for the 2012 program year, E1 has -...

AI summary E1 has implemented Enabling Strategies as part of its DSM Plan since 2010, focusing on education, research, and innovation. These strategies have supported market adoption and industry growth, with E1 investing around 10% of its DSM portfolio in enabling strategies. The DSM landscape is evolving with a focus on electrification, distributed energy resources, and equity.

7.3.3.4 LOCATIONAL EFFORTS Locational DSM provides geographically targeted demand-side resources to alleviate capacity-constrained system resources, such as substations and distribution assets. Efforts can include demand response technolog...

AI summary Locational DSM efforts aim to alleviate capacity-constrained system resources through geographically targeted demand-side initiatives, such as the Klondike Pilot. The pilot, launched in 2019, faced challenges due to the pandemic but provided valuable insights. E1 plans to collaborate with NS Power to explore future locational DSM opportunities.

4.1 Proposed Levels of DSM Spending for 2023-2025 [34] As noted earlier in this decision, E1 is seeking Board approval of its Settlement Plan, which includes spending $173.0 million over the three-year period from 2023 to 2025. DSM program...

AI summary E1 is proposing a three-year DSM spending plan of $173 million from 2023 to 2025, aiming for 412.7 GWh of energy savings and 96.7 MW of demand savings. Spending will increase annually, with a focus on residential and BNI sectors, and significant investment in underserved and Mi'kmaw communities.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EfficiencyOne (E1) for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Pow...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) applied for approval of a supply agreement and a 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power). The Board approved the application, setting a total funding of $173 million with specific energy and demand savings targets. Adjustments may be required if targets are not met, and the Board accepted evaluation and verification reports for the 2021 DSM year.

in the 2023-2025 Plan? Which programs are designed to achieve early replacement? If E1 1 2 proposes to change the emphasis on early retirement from the 2020-2022 programs, please describe how. 20 costs and benefits of various demand respon...

AI summary The text discusses requests for clarification regarding the 2023-2025 Plan, specifically about changes in emphasis on early retirement from previous programs, and requests for explanations on cost calculations, exclusion of certain lighting and load categories, and assumptions in distribution modeling.

Document: 294149 Date Filed: April 14, 2022 Synapse (E1) Page 5 of 9 1 2 with the cost data in these figures. It appears that labels in the two figures are mislabeled. If this is correct, please provide corrected figures and/or tables. 16...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions and requests related to cost data, capital cost reductions, payback acceptance curves, program enrollment assumptions, unit impacts, incentive determination, administrative costs, and energy savings estimates for demand response (DR) programs.

1 Please explain whether this percentage includes money spent by NS Power ratepayers for 1 2022 M10473 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 "E1's investment in customer incentives continues to be a significant category of spending as expected in a resourc...

AI summary The text discusses EfficiencyOne's (E1) investment in customer incentives and how they are set using a methodology from the CLEAResult study. It also asks whether E1 has considered NS Power's rate increases in the current General Rates Application and references avoided energy and capacity costs calculated using the 2020 IRP Reference Plan.

- a) Understanding that each program listed in Table 2 has passed the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test, please describe the process and provide a list of criteria used to justify the even split in investments between Residential Programs and...

AI summary The text contains a series of requests related to the EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, including inquiries about investment splits between residential and BNI programs, TRC and PAC test results, and the Settlement Plan's savings and spending as a percentage of load and revenue.

One 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, Page 42 of 65, Figure 6: Proposed Investment Ramp-up Between 2022 and 2023. This ramp up assumes an inflation rate of 4%. Please provide the source of this assumption. - Request IR-5: Please refer to the Ef...

AI summary The document contains several requests related to the EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 DSM Resource Plan, including questions about the source of an inflation rate assumption, the plan to achieve savings from increased investment, utilization of industry partners, fuel cost projections, and the validity of a statement regarding bill savings for non-participants.

a) Have any surveys or other studies been conducted to verify the accuracy of the 100% installation assumption? b) Please explain the assumption of the measure removal being "highly unlikely." - Request IR-3: Please refer to the 2021 M1047...

AI summary The text includes questions about the verification of a 100% installation assumption and the likelihood of measure removal, as well as a request for savings targets and verified savings from specific programs in the BNI Customer Incentives Program, BNI Energy Management Information Systems, and BNI Strategic Energy Management for the years 2020 and 2021.

- Please refer to the 2021 M10473 DSM Savings Verification Report, Page 12. The report states that "Econoler is using the current general evaluation guidelines appropriately," and that Econoler "has demonstrated thorough knowledge of the U...

AI summary The document references a 2021 DSM Savings Verification Report, highlighting Econoler's adherence to evaluation guidelines and questioning the Evaluator's methods and the reasons for lower energy savings in the BNI Efficiency Products Rebates program compared to 2020.

8 Table 1: 2023-2025 Settlement Plan Investment and Savings Year Investmenta ($ million) Lifetime Benefitsb ($ million) First-Year Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Energy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average Measure Life (years) Peak EE Demand Savi...

AI summary The table outlines the 2023-2025 Settlement Plan's investment and savings, showing annual investments, lifetime benefits, energy savings, and demand response capacity. It notes that while E1's investment is included, NS Power collaboration is also necessary for realizing demand response benefits.

5. INVESTMENT LEVEL AND ENERGY SAVINGS - The proposed investment for the three-year period of the Settlement Plan is $173 million, for both energy efficiency and demand response programs. The Settlement Plan represents an increase in deman...

AI summary The Settlement Plan proposes a $173 million investment in energy efficiency and demand response programs over three years, an increase of $63 million from the 2020-2022 DSM Plan. This investment is supported by the Consumer Advocate, Ecology Action Centre, and Membertou First Nation. It is expected to deliver significant energy savings and contribute to climate change goals by reducing CO2e emissions.

Year Investment Lifetime Benefits First-Year Energy Savings Lifetime Energy Savings Weighted Average Measure Life Peak EE Demand Savings Available DR Capacity Total Resource CostTest (TRC) Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) ($ million)...

AI summary The table presents data on energy efficiency investments and benefits from 2023 to 2025, including lifetime benefits, energy savings, and demand reductions. It provides metrics such as investment amounts, energy savings in gigawatt-hours, weighted average measure life, and peak demand savings in megawatts.

4.1 Proposed Levels of DSM Spending for 2023-2025 [34] As noted earlier in this decision, E1 is seeking Board approval of its Settlement Plan, which includes spending $173.0 million over the three-year period from 2023 to 2025. DSM program...

AI summary E1 proposes a three-year DSM spending plan of $173 million from 2023 to 2025, targeting energy savings of 412.7 GWh and demand savings of 96.7 MW. Spending is expected to increase annually, with 55% directed to residential programs and 45% to BNI sectors. A significant portion is allocated to underserved and diverse communities, including Mi'kmaw communities.