Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M12282

1 2. Review and discuss the consideration of utility system impacts in the Nova Scotia test. One 2 of the core principles of the NSPM is that to provide an accurate comparison of demand side 3 and supply side options, all utility system im...

AI summary The document discusses the consideration of utility system impacts and non-utility system impacts in the Nova Scotia test. It highlights the inclusion of avoided costs for energy, capacity, transmission, and distribution for the electric system, while gas system non-commodity impacts are not quantified. Non-utility impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutants, and host customer costs are also addressed.

tely 13 used by E1 for screening the 2027-2031 DSM portfolio are likely to be from the same sources, but in 14 many cases will be updated from the values used by EFG for the illustrative examples. 15 Table 3: Data Sources and Application i...

AI summary The document discusses data sources used by E1 for the 2027-2031 DSM portfolio, noting that they are likely from the same sources as EFG but may be updated. It also references the National Energy Screening Project and National Standard Practice Manuals used in benefit-cost analysis and utility system impacts.

oided distribution. grid locations. Transmission and distribution line losses should be based on marginal losses from generator. Program E1 program administration costs EFG made assumptions about program Administration including marketing...

AI summary The document discusses assumptions made by EFG regarding program administration costs, fuel price trends, greenhouse gas emissions, and host customer impacts. It references data from Natural Resources Canada and the US Energy Information Administration, and reviews proxy values for non-energy benefits based on DSMAG work.

2005 Market Response to Photovoltaic Incentive Offerings: An Analysis of Trends and Indicators. Presented at the International Solar Energy Society Solar World Congress, 2005. 2003 Solar Energy Value and Opportunities in Vermont, Invited S...

AI summary The text lists various presentations and publications related to renewable energy, solar energy, and energy efficiency, focusing on case studies, market responses, and software tools developed for evaluating energy efficiency and renewable energy opportunities.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 20 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ.#,#/-+0ÿ,...

AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and discussing the application of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings, including the use of standardized practices and evaluation methods.

ÿCD@Z NMNÿB@ÿR@ABÿJLAB@VMDAÿB@ÿNMFDOUÿBRMÿ J@ABAÿ@FÿA@VMÿGHIAÿ ?@ABÿKLAB@VMDÿaHSAÿ bMEMF BAÿOENÿJ@ABAÿ@FÿGHIAÿBROBÿODMÿAMCODOBMÿFD@VÿMEMDWUcDMPOBMNÿ VCOJBAÿ d@\c EJ@VMÿaHSAÿ a@EcMEMDWUÿTMEMF BAÿOENÿJ@ABAÿBROBÿOFFMJBÿP@\c EJ@VMÿGHIÿR@ABÿJLA...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs and the importance of cost-benefit analysis in utility proceedings. It references the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis and highlights the need for proper evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives and their impact on utility operations and customer affordability.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 23 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ.#,#/-+0ÿ,...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes a table with various categories and values, and mentions a test application related to energy efficiency initiatives.

QDM P@ÿ@@DMAÿQDOKAAÿMN@ÿƒI?AŽÿ‘ ]VO@ÿ[‡’ÿ ANKXAÿNKXÿMN@ÿ CM@OQDM P@ÿ@@DMAÿT@MX@@CÿR AMO TVM@Rÿ‚NKMKPKBMQ DAÿQCRÿAMKOQ]@ÿQCRÿT@MX@@CÿIIÿQCRÿ ƒ?ÿDQCÿQ@DMÿMN@ÿMKMQBÿT@C@ MAÿKÿQÿGI~Žÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ...

AI summary The text contains a fragment of a regulatory proceeding document with references to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and a National Standard Practice Manual. It includes a filing date of May 16, 2025, and appears to be part of a larger submission.

ÿ03.-1$"6.ÿ-1ÿ%#6- 0 %#-"ÿ#+/ÿ#/$ + .-6#- "ÿ01.-.ÿ &"#/ÿ-1ÿ-!"ÿ$16"ÿ.3 .-#+- "ÿ;"+"6#&ÿ3- & -4ÿ01.-.ÿ,16ÿ-! .ÿ &&3.-6#- "ÿ#+#&4. .>ÿ ?ÿN7ÿ7M 8ÿSMT ÿBÿ81.-ÿ03.-1$"6ÿ01.-.ÿ +0&3/"ÿ +-"601++"0- 1+ÿ,"".5ÿ-6#+.#0- 1+ÿ01.-.5ÿ #+/ÿEFGÿ01.-....

AI summary The text discusses the application of an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis in the context of a regulatory proceeding, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It mentions the role of the Building Code Division and Nova Scotia Power in the process.

•“ •’ •‘ • ” “ ’ ‘  g,$#!4ÿ– =#1,-& f-.#+".), 7)-. 676 ˆ.3.4 7)-. ;$. ?181(.4 ), ?"-.) $#- %4-.$ ?"-.) $#- >$,$0.- ÿ I^OPGUJZC_Gÿ̀SaÿbWFPXWNCWOÿ =/$ÿ;%cdÿ8#) 2$-ÿ!"21,($ÿ),ÿ/)Aÿ.)ÿ1,134e$ÿ1,2ÿ8#)#.e$ÿ1ÿ8)#.0)3)ÿ)0ÿ "3.83$ÿfghÿ.48$-ÿ1(#)...

AI summary The text discusses the role of the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism in Nova Scotia's regulatory proceedings, highlighting concerns over its impact on cost recovery and the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs. It also touches on the importance of prudence reviews and the evaluation of efficiency programs.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 27 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ%&'ÿ(#$)$ +)ÿ,ÿ- )+ÿ./ÿ...

AI summary The document outlines an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes a section discussing the application of standard practices in the context of an analysis involving EfficiencyOne.

!"##$%&ÿ $() +,-(ÿ.-/-01+2ÿ1+30 4/05,/50-ÿ6$789:ÿ;<ÿ <=>?@;=>AÿBCB=>DÿEFÿBD;@=ÿD>=>@Bÿ; D><=ÿ BCB=>DBÿ=G;=ÿ><;HI>Bÿ=JEKJ;CÿLEDDM< L;= E<ÿH>=J>><ÿM= I = >Bÿ; @BNÿ $220-2 /O0Pÿ;ÿLEDQ; ?E= ;=>BÿJ =GÿQ@EAML>@BÿEFÿ;ÿM= I =CÿB>@ L>ÿBMLGÿ;Bÿ>I>L=...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the evaluation of program effectiveness. It also references the role of the Building Code Division and Nova Scotia Power in implementing and assessing these programs.

8ÿ "#01 .ÿ$#$"%, "ÿ7!%$,ÿ5$!%$,'Aÿ!1ÿ"5$/ '%, $'ÿ:$(.(8ÿ#$!16!" 1Aÿ!'ÿ -++-'$1ÿ%-ÿ%5-'$ÿ"- $"%$1ÿ!%ÿ%,!'/ '' -ÿ:$(.(8ÿ+0/+$1ÿ531,-ÿ!1ÿ"-/+,$''$1ÿ! ,A(ÿ:B$$ÿ=5!+%$,ÿm(Aÿÿ EIJabOzHIJKLFKePÿ%5$ÿ "#0' -ÿ- ÿ-&$,#!++ .ÿ /+!"%'ÿ ÿ!!#3'$'8ÿ!1ÿ%50'...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs and the analysis of cost-benefit for such initiatives, involving entities like EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power. It references various regulatory proceedings and mechanisms, including fuel-cost-adjustment and rate-related considerations.

: ,:ÿ/-.ÿ3 /0.0ÿ3:/3ÿ3-/Jÿ:./3ÿ +ÿ3:.ÿ/3=50J:.-.ÿK +,271 +>ÿ,/-;5+ÿ1 5 1.8ÿ =.3:/+.8ÿ+ 3-570ÿ5 1.8ÿ/+1ÿ4275- +/3.1ÿ>/0.0Lÿ.= 33.1ÿ4-5=ÿ:7=/+ÿ/,3 R 3 .08ÿJ- =/- 2<ÿ;7-+ +>ÿ4500 2ÿ 47.20ÿ45-ÿ.2.,3- , 3<ÿ>.+.-/3 5+8ÿ3-/+0J5-3/3 5+8ÿ +1703- /2...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy efficiency programs, including the role of the Building Code Division and EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis in assessing program effectiveness. It touches on topics like energy efficiency, compliance, and the evaluation of energy programs in Nova Scotia.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 32 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%!&ÿ'()ÿ )+ ,-ÿ.,/)+ 01ÿ...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis and compliance with standards. The document also mentions the application of the =>? framework and the use of standardized practices in energy efficiency evaluations.

).'+ . '5ÿ80-ÿ186ÿ+)6,3+.)6@ÿ 0.43- 01ÿ=>?6@ÿ.80ÿ7)ÿ 3'ÿ 0',ÿ 4)/)4 9)-ÿ.,6'6ÿ',ÿ844,Hÿ2,+ÿ8ÿ+)48' /)45ÿ6 A 4)@ÿ- +).'ÿ.,A 8+ 6,0ÿ8.+,66ÿ- 22)+)0'ÿ+)6,3+.)6:ÿÿ sLCE$TLoÿTJKLMCB&ÿ A 8.'6ÿ'(8'ÿ8+)ÿ) ).')-ÿ',ÿ7)ÿ,2ÿ6322 . )0'ÿA810 '3-)ÿ',ÿ822...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives. It references the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis and Nova Scotia Power, emphasizing the importance of cost-effectiveness and program evaluation in the regulatory process.

4ÿ/,-ÿ .88315/0 L1ÿ70 : 0 14?ÿ27, . 3/:ÿ/66516/085ÿ68L15, ,6ÿ@8/5-4?ÿ/,-ÿ2851Aÿ ]DpEB"&!Cÿ%D! %D$"#WD+ÿ0F1ÿ315431.0 L1ÿ8;ÿ5167:/0854ÿ85ÿ80F15ÿ/61,04ÿ0F/0ÿ8L15411ÿ514875.1ÿ ,L14021,0ÿ .F8 .14?ÿ ,.:7- ,6ÿ1,156Mÿ61,15/0 8,ÿ/,-ÿKt<ÿ ,;5/4057.0...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of efficiency programs, including the role of the Building Code Division and EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis. It also addresses regulatory considerations related to energy efficiency, program performance, and the evaluation of benefits and costs associated with these initiatives.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 34 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&ÿ( )$ÿ #)$ÿ+ ( ,-ÿ.ÿ/0...

AI summary The text references the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and the National Standard Practice Manual, discussing the application of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings and the use of standard practices in evaluating energy efficiency programs. It highlights the role of regulatory frameworks and the importance of standardized procedures in assessing the impact of energy efficiency initiatives.

C: :G=:?<ÿG?C5A5>ÿ @UÿA5IFBD=?A;ÿ?Aÿ?=45Aÿ5<=:=:5;ÿ=4D=ÿ?C5A;55ÿJKLÿ:<:=:D=:C5;Pÿ  ÿA5Q5A;ÿ@A?D>BUÿ=?ÿD ;Hÿ:NTB5N5<=;Hÿ?Aÿ;FTT?A=;ÿJKL;ÿF;: ;ÿ =4D=ÿDA5ÿ?C5A;55<ÿ@UÿA5IFBD=?A;ÿ?Aÿ?=45Aÿ>5G:;:? 5;ÿ: ÿF=:B:=:5;€ÿTF@B:GBUÿ ?S<5>ÿF=:B:=:5;€ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs and the analysis of cost-benefit assessments in Nova Scotia. It includes references to energy efficiency initiatives, regulatory processes, and the evaluation of various programs aimed at improving energy efficiency and reducing costs.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 38 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%& 'ÿ$()ÿ&% ÿ'%$+ &#) '...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines key considerations for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including the importance of accurate cost-benefit analysis, program design, and stakeholder engagement.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 39 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿÿ!87 8" #ÿ$%&'ÿ&() +,-...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of standard practices in the context of benefit-cost analysis and discusses the relevance of these practices in regulatory proceedings.

+,&(>ÿ- -).3&)&.:7ÿ(/.+3/ ÿ>/'7ÿ1& 7ÿ2312/(-7ÿ /(,ÿ>/'1 &(-ÿA&?-?7ÿ/22 &)/.&1('ÿ8%-3-ÿ/ÿ4567ÿ13ÿ)1<9&(/.&1('ÿ1;ÿ456'7ÿ/;;-).ÿ<+ .&2 -ÿ;+- ÿ.:2-'C?ÿ $%-ÿ)1()-2.'ÿ/(,ÿ>+&,/()-ÿ&(ÿ.%-ÿDEFGÿ)/(ÿ9-ÿ/22 &-,ÿ.1ÿ91.%ÿ9-%&(,=.%-=<-.-3ÿAJ$GCÿ/(,ÿ;31...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of the 456 program, including the use of benefit-cost analysis, efficiency measures, and regulatory considerations. It references the DEFG and mentions the role of Nova Scotia Power in the proceedings.

3/).&0-ÿ-;;&)&-(.ÿ9+& ,&(>'lÿA9Cÿ<+ .&2 -ÿ456ÿ.:2-'ÿ.%/.ÿ /3-ÿ 1)/.-,ÿ&(ÿ/ÿ)-3./&(ÿ>-1>3/2%&)ÿ/3-/ÿ.1ÿ&,-(.&;:ÿ(1(=8&3-'ÿ'1 +.&1('lÿ/(,ÿA)Cÿ<+ .&2 -=456ÿ .:2-'ÿ.%/.ÿ/3-ÿ 1)/.-,ÿ/)31''ÿ.%-ÿ-(.&3-ÿ+.& &.:ÿ':'.-<?ÿi%/2.-3'ÿggmgnÿ2310&,-ÿ)1('&...

AI summary The document discusses the role of the 456 Efficiency Program in addressing energy efficiency and cost management. It highlights the importance of aligning base rates with actual costs and the need for effective program design to avoid perverse incentives. The 456 program is mentioned as a key initiative in this context.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 40 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ!" #$%!"&ÿ' ()!'#ÿ ' ÿ(#$...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, including the role of the Building Code Division and the Demand-side Management Plan.

B?BJÿI>A<=?<;ÿ_<<\ B=Eÿ]>aÿ ^=?:?=GÿFGE=;Hÿ b?E=>?W =?\Bÿ b9cEÿ V>ABEH?EE?\Bÿ ^=?:?=GYF A=?\Bÿ K$(#$N7#$+'Q P $#$+' "ÿ $(#$N7#$+'ÿ0" ''$',ÿ ÿ Yÿ Yÿ Yÿ +'"&ÿdÿ%!#$) ""&ÿ $'#!, #! ÿÿ S'#!, #! ÿ $(#$N7#$+'ÿ0" ''$',ÿeSKfgÿ ÿ ÿ Yÿ Yÿ h!#$) ""&ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of benefit-cost analyses and the implementation of demand-side management plans, focusing on the methodologies used to assess energy efficiency programs and their impacts. It references regulatory frameworks and processes for evaluating energy programs.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 41 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ !"#ÿ%&'()&) +,+-. ÿ/+0,+)...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of HIJ (a program or initiative) and its impact on energy efficiency, including benefits, cost considerations, and implementation strategies.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 69 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ#"$ÿ%&"&ÿ'()ÿ&" (+,-)$ÿ....

AI summary This document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures for evaluating benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings, including the use of the 678 framework and the role of the Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework in assessing energy efficiency programs.

ÿ"#$ÿ&#'#() +ÿ,'"ÿ-.+ +ÿ /012ÿ3045678ÿ58727962ÿ4ÿ3464:;<ÿ;=ÿ607ÿ849<7ÿ;=ÿ>797=162ÿ49?ÿ3;262ÿ6046ÿ@1<06ÿ>7ÿ455:134>:7ÿ6;ÿ49AÿBCDÿ 6A57Eÿ193:F?19<ÿ4ÿ>817=ÿ?72381561;9ÿ;=ÿ7430ÿ6A57ÿ;=ÿ>797=16ÿ;8ÿ3;26GÿH045678ÿIÿ?72381>72ÿ2;@7ÿ4??161;94:ÿ 122F...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of BCD (likely a program or regulation) and its impact on energy management and efficiency. It outlines the role of BCD in shaping energy policies, the challenges in implementation, and the need for alignment with broader energy efficiency goals. The text also touches on the evaluation of energy programs and the importance of stakeholder engagement.

VWWÿ[\ÿ 10)(80+ÿ90-T: 8'6ÿ45@'8ÿ4+01)ÿ)5ÿ.'')ÿ/(-)5.'8ÿ6'.016<ÿ )ÿ@ ++ÿ2'ÿ+5/;'6ÿ 1)5ÿ)&0)ÿ8'-5(8/'ÿ:58ÿ)&'ÿ )&8''ÿ58ÿ:5(8ÿ,'08-ÿ )ÿ)0;'-ÿ)5ÿ/51-)8(/)ÿ)&'ÿ45@'8ÿ4+01)>ÿ]:ÿBCD-ÿ08'ÿ 1-)0++'6ÿ 1-)'06ÿ5:ÿ)&0)ÿ4+01)<ÿ)&'1ÿ )&'ÿ() + ),ÿ@ ++ÿ&07...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation and implications of BCD (likely a regulatory measure or program), focusing on its impact on cost structures, program design, and compliance with regulatory standards. It highlights concerns about alignment with energy efficiency goals and the need for adjustments in program design and oversight.

%41&#$ÿ4(11!-$3ÿ1#ÿ1#3!ÿ;&1ÿ&,!-Z"#31ÿ"#$3 %41&#$ÿ4(11!-$38ÿ_#31Z3&+1&$,ÿ0!1;!!$ÿ" 31#%!-3ÿ &3ÿ(ÿ.&++!-!$1ÿ%(11!-ÿ+-#%ÿ"#31Z!++!"1&'!$!33ÿ($.ÿ3# ).ÿ$#1ÿ0!ÿ(""# $1!.ÿ+#-ÿ&$ÿ̀_?38ÿa1ÿ&3ÿ$#$!1!)!33ÿ #+ÿ,-!(1ÿ&%4#-1($"!ÿ1#ÿ-!, )(1#-3ÿ($.ÿ#1!-ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of the 567 Standard Practice Manual in Nova Scotia Power's (NSP) regulatory proceedings, including the use of the Standard Test Unit (STU) and the Affordable Bill Cap (ABC). It outlines the impact of these practices on cost recovery and service delivery.

-.#(X="/$2/ .++:ÿ.(ÿ=.-/ÿ"0ÿ.ÿ2"2D= =$(ÿ("+1/ "2ÿAVY!BX,.2ÿ +")$-ÿ3$#.23ÿ0"-ÿ;.(ÿ(1==+:ÿ31- 2;ÿ=$.Cÿ/ #$(ÿ.23ÿ,-$./$ÿ5$2$0 /(>ÿ?+/$-2./ 4$+:<ÿ 0ÿ%&'(ÿ 2,-$.($ÿ 3$#.23ÿ"2ÿ"/9$-ÿ01$+ÿ,.=., /:ÿ31- 2;ÿ=$.Cÿ/ #$(ÿA$>;><ÿZ[Y\ÿ01$+ÿ,$++(B<ÿ /ÿ) +...

AI summary The document discusses regulatory proceedings related to Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and the implementation of the Affordable Bill Cap (ABC). It addresses the need for adjustments in billing practices and the potential impacts on customers, including the use of standard test units (STU) and standard practice manuals (567). The text also outlines the importance of compliance with regulatory standards and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs.

.+ÿ 2,$2/ 4$(ÿ#.:ÿ,"#$ÿ 2ÿ4.- "1(ÿ0"-#(<ÿ 2,+13 2;ÿ-$5./$(ÿ0"-ÿ%&'ÿ/$,92"+"; $(<ÿ51:D 3")2(ÿ"0ÿ 2/$-$(/ÿ-./$(ÿ0"-ÿ0 2.2, 2;ÿ.ÿ="-/ "2ÿ"0ÿ%&'ÿ,"(/(<ÿ=.:#$2/(ÿ/"ÿ(1=="-/ÿ/-.3$ÿ.++:ÿ-$="-/ 2;ÿ"2ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ7...

AI summary The document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the use of the %&' mechanism, and the analysis of cost-benefit factors, program effectiveness, and the impact of energy efficiency initiatives on utility operations.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 92 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#"$ÿ%&#ÿ#'(#) #+ÿ ,ÿ-%.#ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test using the National Standard Practice Manual. It highlights the use of FGH2 and the importance of standard test units and practices in evaluating energy efficiency programs.

2%6# <4"ÿD-#ÿB ÿ,6ÿ2,/#ÿ,6ÿ -#2#ÿ5#1#6! 2ÿ%&#ÿ,6 #1ÿ:&#% #&ÿ6,&ÿ0,;C!1),/#ÿ)32 ,/#&2ÿ -%1ÿ6,&ÿ 1,1C0,;C!1),/#ÿ)32 ,/#&2"ÿD-!2ÿ!2ÿ5#)%32#ÿ -#ÿ),1+! !,1ÿ,6ÿ -#ÿ0,;C!1),/#ÿ-,32!1:ÿ2 ,)dÿ!2ÿ,6 #1ÿ ;,&2#ÿ%1+e,&ÿ5#)%32#ÿ -#ÿ#),1,/!)ÿ2 &#22ÿ3...

AI summary The document discusses the regulation of energy costs, specifically addressing the implementation of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and their impact on rate structures. It highlights the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs, as well as the role of regulatory oversight in ensuring fair pricing and compliance with energy efficiency standards.

!(= 'ÿ) ÿ,! &$'ÿ%+)=0'ÿ ÿ&'' %%'ÿ)!ÿ&ÿ(=/=0&$#-ÿ &%#%ÿ$)ÿ'$ /#!ÿ)- &00ÿ ()%$A""($#-!%%;ÿ M;ÿN0($ÿ&ÿ()!%#%$!$ÿ&!'ÿ 0#& 0ÿ/ $+)'ÿ") ÿ&00)(&$#!,ÿ1 ), &/ÿ()%$%;ÿN)/ ÿ !"#$%ÿ&!'ÿ ()%$%ÿ/&>ÿ ÿ'# ($0>ÿ&00)(& 0;ÿO) ÿP&/10.ÿ(&1&(#$>ÿ/& Q$ÿ % -&$#)!...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms, referencing specific programs and regulatory frameworks. It outlines the role of energy efficiency initiatives, cost recovery, and the evaluation of programs such as DSM plans and energy efficiency resource standards.

ÿ"#$%&#'(%)"ÿ+),)&-%#.,ÿ&)$.(&/)$ÿ 0123ÿ4156789ÿ:83492;83ÿ718ÿ;8<8=273ÿ5<:ÿ4>373ÿ?>37ÿ98@8A5<7ÿ7>ÿ:23792;B78:ÿC8<89572><ÿDEFGÿ983>B9483HÿI7ÿ 2:8<72=283ÿJ8Kÿ=547>93ÿ7157ÿ5==847ÿEFÿ;8<8=273ÿ5<:ÿ4>373ÿ5<:ÿ69>A2:83ÿCB2:5<48ÿ><ÿ5::98332 ??><ÿ 4...

AI summary The document discusses the Board of Commissioners (BC) and the Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) in the context of a regulatory proceeding involving demand-side management (DSM) and energy standards (ES). It outlines the evaluation of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the role of energy efficiency programs, and the impact of these policies on rate structures and cost recovery.

0'+&!&+ÿ(0#ÿ'1ÿ #$&-ÿ; ,(+ÿ$ ?&ÿ&:'0#&+ÿ'%ÿ#$&ÿ4,%#&!1 4#, (ÿ4 0&8ÿÿ @$'!+2ÿ,#'('#-ÿ0-0#&5ÿ40#0ÿ !&ÿ4!& #&+ÿ%(-ÿ'1ÿ#$&!&ÿ'0ÿ05&ÿ'%4!& 0&ÿ'%ÿ,#'('#-ÿ !&?&%,&ÿ!&k,'!&5&%#08ÿ91ÿ ÿ67ÿ# !'11ÿ!&0,(#0ÿ'%ÿ %ÿ'%4!& 0&ÿ'%ÿ,#'('#-ÿ!&?&%,&ÿ v#'('#-ÿ0-...

AI summary The text discusses the Board of Commissioners' (BC) and Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) analysis of the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, highlighting issues with base rates lagging actual costs and the impact on incentive structures. It also references the 67 # !'11 mechanism and the need for alignment with energy efficiency and conservation initiatives.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 162 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%ÿ!&'ÿ(&!) &)!'(ÿ$+ÿ+'...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test under the EfficiencyOne framework, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It touches on the evaluation of energy efficiency programs and the use of standard practices in regulatory proceedings.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 189 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!""#$%&ÿ'"("#$%ÿ)" ÿ+$,-....

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures related to cost-benefit analysis and includes some technical terms and acronyms, though the content is partially redacted or encoded.

!ÿ#$#%&'() ÿ $,-.'$# ÿ /01210134ÿ567ÿ8093:4ÿ48;301;34ÿ433<ÿ08ÿ1640522ÿ;=201>23ÿ?@Aÿ0B>34ÿ16ÿ5ÿ4>3C1D1CÿE38E:5>91Cÿ5:35ÿD8:ÿ093ÿ >=:>843ÿ8Dÿ73D3::16Eÿ8:ÿ5F81716Eÿ63Gÿ16F340;3604ÿ16ÿ7140:1H=0186ÿ8:ÿ0:564;144186ÿ4B403;4IÿJ914ÿC95>03:ÿ 734C:1H...

AI summary The text discusses the role of MNO in Nova Scotia's energy regulatory process, including its function in cost recovery, fuel cost adjustment mechanisms, and the impact of regulatory decisions on energy pricing and customer affordability. It also highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs.

ÿ-,)),;$(_ÿr:sÿ67+ÿ$(ÿ5#+$4#("$!)ÿ!(4ÿ',%%#5'$!)ÿ83$)4$(_+qÿ tÿ 7(#5_ ÿ# $'$#(' ÿ%#!+35#+ÿ<#9_9̀ÿ)$_2"$(_ÿ!(4ÿ',("5,)+Dÿ tÿ 6#%!(4ÿ5#+&,(+#ÿ<#9_9̀ÿ/$^v$^#(!8)#4ÿ"2#5%,+"!"+Dÿ tÿ 6$+"5$83"#4ÿ&2,",1,)"!$'+ÿÿ tÿ 6$+"5$83"#4ÿ+",5!_#ÿ+ +"#%+ÿÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the regulation and management of energy efficiency programs, including the implementation of the benefit-cost analysis test and the evaluation of demand-side management (DSM) initiatives. It outlines the process for assessing the effectiveness of these programs and their impact on utility operations.

ÿ278 ]ÿ^^ _ÿÿ̀ a1-$-ÿ"-$!5'$ÿ&(!5%ÿ<-ÿ!$-%ÿ'(ÿb"#("#'#c-ÿ6&"($$ÿ789$ÿ6)%ÿ$-5-&'ÿ'1-ÿ;($'ÿ&($'0-33-&'#4-ÿ()-$ ÿ+("ÿ -d6;b5-:ÿ!'#5#'#-$ÿ("ÿ('1-"$ÿ&(!5%ÿ6&&-b'ÿ'1-ÿ;($'ÿ&($'0-33-&'#4-ÿ789$:ÿ#)ÿ'-";$ÿ(3ÿ-#'1-"ÿ)-'ÿ<-)-3#'$ÿ("ÿ <-)-3#'0&($'...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of the 789$ demand-side management (DSM) plan, including its impact on cost recovery, efficiency, and regulatory considerations. It outlines the role of the 789$ plan in managing energy demand, evaluating benefit-cost analyses, and addressing challenges related to program design and implementation.

kVJ{XMÿKJhMÿ_euJWhgÿWkYXZÿZkÿgkÿ{mÿWkVZYWh_VLÿKJhMsÿ{_XXsÿJVZÿ uJKh_W_uJh_kVÿJVJXmgMgÿhkÿgYuuXMeMVhÿh^MÿWkghnMjjMWh_lMVMggÿJVJXmgMgÿdMMÿdMWh_kVÿfTQÿJVZÿvuuMVZ_rÿvTÿÿ PVÿh^_gÿWkVhMrhsÿ_hÿ_gÿYgMjYXÿhkÿWkVZYWhÿJÿKJhMsÿ{_XXsÿJVZÿuJKh_W_uJh_k...

AI summary The document discusses the impact of the Gq] mechanism on the efficiency of demand-side management programs and the challenges associated with aligning base rates with actual costs. It highlights the need for adjustments in the benefit-cost analysis test and the implications of these adjustments for the overall effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives.

MVhÿjKkeÿh^kgMÿuKMgMVhMZÿ^MKMTÿ̀YKh^MKsÿKMgYXhgÿo_XXÿlJKmÿo_h^_Vÿh^MÿGq]ÿhmuMgÿ uKMgMVhMZÿ^MKM“ÿh^MÿGq]ÿhmuMgÿJKMÿ{YVZXMZÿhkLMh^MKÿhkÿ MMuÿh^Mÿj_LYKMgÿjKkeÿ{M_VLÿhkkÿ{YgmTÿdMMÿvuuMVZ_rÿvTÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses in the context of regulatory proceedings, including the application of standardized practices and the evaluation of various metrics.

anual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ)# #+ ,#-ÿ./01ÿ/2ÿ343ÿ5#-!61 /78ÿ9!+1 :+#ÿ4;:/1<#1 6=+ÿ%>50ÿ ÿ ?@ABCÿDEFEDGHICÿEJKÿLMLÿNOKPDHGQJÿERRÿFNQSGKOÿKGTTONOJHÿGJTQNUEHGQJÿEVQPHÿHWOÿGUFEDHXÿQTÿYBZX[ÿ\QNÿ HWQXOÿ]PNGXKGDHGQJXÿGJHONOXHOKÿGJÿESQGKGJ^ÿDEFEDGHIÿDQXHXÿE...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the role of YBZ in managing energy efficiency initiatives, the impact of regulatory frameworks, and the evaluation of program performance. It highlights the importance of accurate cost tracking and the need for alignment between program goals and regulatory oversight.

78 ÿ\ Jÿ]%ÿ &/"3)3ÿ,+ÿ!-)ÿ^_ Zÿ "$#" 0)%ÿ"$ÿS- !)ÿaQÿ $3ÿ'1!-)ÿ )W 0 "$)3ÿ"$ÿ] )$3"Wÿ]Qÿ!-)ÿOVZÿK)%!ÿ"%ÿ3)%" $)3ÿ!&ÿ 33)%%ÿ !)ÿ". #!%ÿ $3ÿ!-))'&)ÿ $%L)%ÿ '1$3 .)$! 00+ÿ3"''))$!ÿ[1)%!"&$%ÿ!- $ÿ3&)%ÿ ÿ#&%!()'')#!"/)$)%%ÿ $ 0+%"%4ÿ]%ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), highlighting concerns about the impact of the Mandatory Net Output (MNO) on energy assistance programs. It emphasizes the need for a benefit-cost analysis (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives to ensure equitable and effective energy policies.

!%ÿ&ÿ !"#" !"&$ÿ !)%QÿL-"#-ÿ )ÿ#"!"# 0ÿ'&ÿ1$3)%! $3"$ ÿ3"%!",1!"&$ 0ÿ)[1"!+4ÿÿ K ,0)ÿN(dÿ%1.. "e)%ÿ!-)ÿ 1 &%)ÿ&'ÿ) #-ÿ&'ÿ!-)ÿ! 3"!"&$ 0ÿ!)%!%Qÿ $3ÿ!-)ÿ)0)/ $#)ÿ!&ÿMNOÿ %%)%%.)$!4ÿÿ

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of the Mandatory Net Output (MNO) and its impact on the benefit-cost analysis (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives. It references the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML) in the context of energy policy discussions.

!"#$%ÿ'(ÿ +,"-.!+ÿ/,01!"2-ÿ,"#ÿ3..-!22$"4ÿ51 ,62-ÿ 789:ÿ;<<=>?9@ÿ F=ÿB>ÿ8BGÿHBÿ9?=>H9IJÿG8=H8=AÿF=AH;9>ÿK=>=I9H:ÿ;>?ÿFB:H:ÿBII:=Hÿ=;F8ÿBH8=Aÿ ;>?ÿ:8BEL?ÿH8=A=IBA=ÿK=ÿ=@FLE?=?ÿIABMÿH8=ÿNOPQÿÿ '(RÿST11,+0ÿU.ÿV!0ÿ/U$"2-ÿ Wÿ78=ÿH=AMÿYZ[]^_ [ÿa...

AI summary The text discusses the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), focusing on benefit-cost analysis (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives. It also references Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Mandatory Net Output (MNO) in the context of energy regulation and policy.

1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 268 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ""#$!ÿ$%&'ÿ!'$()ÿ $!$(+,...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for conducting a benefit-cost analysis, including the application of standards and procedures related to energy efficiency programs.

1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 269 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ%) +)"ÿ, +# -).#/...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCD) test under the EfficiencyOne program, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It highlights the use of a test application and mentions the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML) as related initiatives.

%(pÿrs/"#7"#ÿ; -t#4ÿ,-52#ÿ ..#247ÿ CRXGDE^GREDÿQRÿDI^GÿTUVDÿHJRÿHJPDGÿdFINGDJNGÿGRGLS[ÿJRYÿHJKJHQE[ÿ^JLuGEÿKLQHGDÿEIÿYGHNQRGÿJDÿJÿLGDPNEÿ IMÿLGYPHGYÿYG^JRYAÿ̀FQDÿDFILEeEGL^ÿLGYPHEQIRÿQRÿ^JLuGEÿKLQHGDÿJLGÿE[KQHJNN[ÿLGNJEQXGN[ÿD^JNNÿZPEÿEFGÿ...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy programs and mechanisms, including the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ), Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), and the Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCD). It references the Clean Energy (CDE) initiative and Nova Scotia Power (NSP), highlighting the Mandatory Net Output (MNO) and related regulatory considerations.

1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 271 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ )# +#, ÿ-.ÿ/0-"#...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for conducting benefit-cost analyses in energy efficiency programs, focusing on methodology and evaluation criteria.

1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 272 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ#"$#"ÿ%&ÿ"'() +"ÿ%,-#ÿ....

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and the use of Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCD) in evaluating energy efficiency programs. It outlines the process for assessing the economic benefits and costs of such initiatives.

!"#$%ÿ'(ÿ $+,-."/ÿ01/!+ÿ 2345ÿ67789:4;ÿ7<=>4:85ÿ?@4:69A8ÿ=9ÿ3=BÿC=ÿ:8C8 89855ÿC85Cÿ:45A=@9Cÿ<6C8ÿ C36Cÿ45ÿA=9545C89CÿB4C3ÿC38ÿ=GH8AC4>8I5Jÿ=FÿC38ÿA=5CE8FF8AC4>89855ÿ696KL545ÿ69:ÿC38ÿMNOPQRPSTPUVWQÿ 677K4A6GK8ÿ7=K4ALÿ?=6K5Xÿ238ÿA=9A87C5ÿ:85...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy programs and policies, including the implementation of the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ), the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), and the analysis of benefit-cost (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives. It also references Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Mandatory Net Output (MNO) in the context of energy regulation.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 276 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#"$%ÿ&'"ÿ$"() +&$,ÿ-"$.-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses in regulatory proceedings, focusing on the evaluation of energy efficiency programs and their economic impacts.

1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 279 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ#$%$&'()() ÿ%,$ÿ#(-./0)%...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses in energy efficiency programs, including the use of a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCD) and the application of standard practices for assessing program effectiveness.

ÿ 2==74>??E117 36@?4/=14?01G8.K=?G/K14?6143.6A14?Hff5g -fq4g h1736=Fc/E8K 70Gÿ ÿ !" ÿ17 8ÿT$( ÿ((87 )ÿÿx%ÿ ÿy$  7ÿ76ÿ)ÿ178)zÿ4  zÿ ÿ97[ÿ { }~€‚ÿƒ ÿ !^ ÿ„<2611ÿ]8:4ÿ7=C.=ÿM8EÿdB763L1ÿI3.6ÿP1B8E0ÿh1473E41ÿ563@...

AI summary The text contains a mix of encoded or corrupted data, URLs, and references to various regulatory proceedings, including energy efficiency programs and legal matters. It includes mentions of Nova Scotia Power, the Public Utilities Act, and other regulatory topics, though the content is not fully readable or coherent.

-energy benefit, while recognizing that excluding non- energy benefits is an implicit valuation of zero. Reliability: A reduction in the frequency or duration of electricity system outages. Resilience: Increased ability for customers and t...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to benefit-cost analysis in energy efficiency planning, including reliability, resilience, Total Resource Cost Test, and Utility Cost Test. It references changes to Section 79H(2) of Chapter 380 in October 2022 and includes information about the Energy Futures Group, Inc.

s on the gas system. In the future further consideration of the gas system non- commodity cost impacts may be necessary and appropriate. (See Tables 4 and 11, and Section V). 6) For host customer impacts the new jurisdictional test should...

AI summary The text discusses the need to consider non-commodity costs of the gas system, the inclusion of non-energy benefits in the jurisdictional test for host customers, the use of social cost of carbon for societal impacts, and the recommendation to assess economic and job impacts of DSM separately. It also references specific tables and sections for detailed analysis.

affordability in Nova Scotia’s policy objectives. Energy Futures Group, Inc PO Box 587, Hinesburg, VT 05461 – USA 802-482-5001 802-329-2143 [email protected] DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 18 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analy...

AI summary This document discusses the affordability of energy policies in Nova Scotia, focusing on a benefit-cost analysis test application by Energy Futures Group, Inc. It includes a table illustrating the impact of replacing 1,000 heat pumps in Nova Scotia using avoided costs from 2023-2025.

Updated NSP Avoided Costs Capacity (time and seasonal U dependent) ($8.70) ($8.70) 8.70 t Generation Should be reflected in Environmental Compliance i Avoided Costs 0 0 0 l Should be reflected in RPS/CES Compliance i Avoided Costs 0 0 0 t...

AI summary The text presents an updated table of avoided costs for Nova Scotia Power (NSP), including capacity, generation, environmental compliance, RPS/CES compliance, market price effects, and transmission capacity. Specific figures and adjustments are outlined, such as the $8.70 and $1.86 values for different cost categories.

ollection Need to be developed Risk Need to be developed Should be reflected in Reliability Avoided Costs 0 0 0 Resilience NM NM NM NM Sub Total Electric Impacts ($26.08) ($26.08) $20.16 Other Fuels Avoided Heating Oil/Natural Gas Fuel cos...

AI summary The text presents a table summarizing various impacts related to energy projects, including reliability, resilience, avoided costs, fuel costs, health impacts, and greenhouse gas emissions. It highlights financial figures and environmental considerations associated with different energy sources and initiatives.

energyfuturesgroup.com 21 Figure 1: Illustrative Example of Recommended Nova Scotia Test As illustrated, the major drivers for the differences between these cases are the value of the saved other fuel, and the valuation of the avoided carb...

AI summary The text presents an illustrative example of a benefit-cost analysis test for Nova Scotia, highlighting the differences in value between cases involving fuel oil and natural gas, as well as the benefits of replacing electric resistance heat with heat pumps. The analysis considers the value of saved fuel, avoided carbon emissions, and the resulting net benefits.

include tax or other incentives as reductions to host customer costs. + Water cost impacts  NA NA NA NA NA Some efficiency measures also reduce water consumption +/- Host Customer Energy Impacts Proxy EE DR DG DS BE EV Time required to en...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of various energy efficiency and demand response measures on host customer costs and non-energy benefits. It highlights how some measures reduce water consumption and energy costs, as well as improve resilience and productivity. It also notes the economic well-being benefits from reduced energy bills.

acts from GHG and other air pollutants. 33 While the E1 portfolio and support for DERs will provide societal benefits and impacts beyond these two categories as indicated in Table 17, the 33 The consultant team recommends the US EPA’s bene...

AI summary The text discusses the recommendation to calculate net CO2e emissions for efficiency and fuel switching measures, referencing the Difference in Carbon Emissions (DICE) method used by E1 for the 2023-2025 Plan. It also highlights the importance of estimating benefits from air quality improvements due to reduced PM, SO2, and NOx emissions.

2023-2025 Plan (Difference in Carbon Emissions or DICE) can be applied or may be updated to reflect Nova Scotia Power’s updated emissions estimates from the latest integrated resource plan. Reductions of GHG emissions from avoided on-site...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the 2023-2025 Plan (DICE) and the consideration of lifecycle emissions in evaluating decarbonization strategies. It highlights that GHG impact estimates only account for on-site combustion and electric generation, not upstream emissions. Social costs of greenhouse gases are based on Canadian guidance, with a 2% real discount rate. Calculations of avoided GHG benefits are illustrated, noting that carbon price elements are subtracted from fuel costs to avoid double counting.

Costs Electricity System Increased Capacity Avoided Electric System Electric $/MWh MWh Energy Costs Peak kW $/kW-yr. T&D Capacity Costs System Costs

AI summary The text presents a table outlining various costs related to the electricity system, including energy costs, peak kW costs, transmission and distribution (T&D) costs, and system costs. The table includes metrics such as $/MWh, MWh, and $/kW-yr.

Electric Avoided Increased Increased Increased Net (Gas Benefit Costs Electricity Electric Increased Capacity Avoided Electric System minus Electric Year $/MWh MWh System Costs Peak kW $/kW-yr. T&D Capacity Costs System Costs) 2023 2024 20...

AI summary The document presents a table showing financial and operational metrics for a period from 2023 to 2038, including avoided costs, increased electricity and system costs, capacity costs, and net gas benefits. The data indicates rising costs and increasing capacity requirements over time.

2040 $341 $4,194 $100,886 43 https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/science-research-data/social- cost-ghg.html Energy Futures Group, Inc PO Box 587, Hinesburg, VT 05461 – USA 802-482-5001 802-329-2143...

AI summary The document provides price projections for heating fuel oil, including a starting price of $1.65 per litre and an average annual escalation rate of 0.20%, with references to sources for recent price data and outlooks.

9 Impact Category Impact Type Impact Work Products Energy Generation Capacity Avoided costs of energy & capacity are currently Generation Environmental Compliance developed and provided by NS Power; in the future these are expected to come...

AI summary The text outlines the current and future responsibilities of NS Power and the NSIESO in developing avoided costs for energy generation, transmission, and distribution. It highlights the transition of responsibilities and considerations such as marginal system losses and the role of E1 in developing financial incentives.

- 7 See Table 5 from the EFG Report, reproduced below, as an illustrative example of the accounting. [1](#page-37-0) 8 Nova Sco tia Test ($Million), 2% Social Di scount Rate, Usine 202 3-2025 Av oided Co osts: Example based on 1,000 Heat P...

AI summary The text presents a table from the EFG Report illustrating the accounting of benefits and costs associated with replacing 1,000 heat pumps in Nova Scotia. It includes avoided costs for generation, transmission, and distribution, as well as financial incentives, program administration, and environmental impacts.

Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (IG) IR-16 Page 1 of 2 M12282, E1 BCA Test Application, May 16, 2025, Appendix B: Development of a Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Analysis Framework for Nova Scotia (EFG Report), Prepared by Energy Futures Group, p...

AI summary The text presents a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) framework example, showing how changes in incentive amounts affect host customer measure costs while maintaining a constant benefit-cost ratio of 4.17. Total benefits are listed as $41.26, and total costs are $9.9, with incentives playing a key role in adjusting costs without affecting the ratio.

- 2 system benefit that is not measured and is considered not material. 1 Request IR-05: 5 (a) Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Guidance (TBCS): Include all relevant economic, 6 environmental, and social impacts 7 BCA: includes utility...

AI summary The document outlines the considerations for a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) in relation to Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, emphasizing the inclusion of economic, environmental, and social impacts, full lifecycle analysis, and market adjustments. It notes that Nova Scotia does not participate in an organized wholesale electricity market, affecting the inclusion of certain metrics.

- Halifax Regional Municipality. 1 Request IR-25: 2 3 Reference: Appendix A, Mr. Hill's Evidence 4 5 Table 3 on Page 12 of 18 of Mr. Hill's Evidence: Data Sources and Application in Developing 6 Recommended Nova Scotia Test: 7 8 (a) For th...

AI summary The response to Request IR-25 discusses assumptions made by Energy Futures Group (EFG) regarding program administration and incentive costs, as well as the removal of carbon costs for fuel under 'Other Fuels' to avoid double counting. EFG used a 40% market rate incentive and installed measure costs of $8,000 for heat pumps in 2026. Carbon costs for fuels were excluded from 'Other Fuels' and accounted for under 'Societal' impacts using the social cost of carbon.

- i) The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook was used for projected escalation rates for heating oil, propane and natural gas. For each fuel a simple average was used between the values of the high and low sc...

AI summary The document discusses the use of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook for projecting fuel price escalation rates and the application of a new BCA framework. It also outlines the assumptions made by EFG, including the use of a 40% incentive for heat pump replacements and the estimation of non-energy benefits based on energy savings.

E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 a. No. The energy benefits are included in the other fuel impacts and are not 2 adjusted in relation to the estimate of non-energy host customer benefi...

AI summary The response indicates that energy benefits are included in other fuel impacts and are not adjusted in relation to the estimate of non-energy host customer benefits.

E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL - (b) Please refer to E1's response to NSEB IR-26. Data sources are noted in the workbook. Workbook calculations are in real dollars, though not all values...

AI summary E1 provides responses to information requests from the Small Business Advocate, referencing prior responses and noting that data sources are included in a workbook. Calculations are in real dollars with a 2% real discount rate applied, and regional factors such as Nova Scotia price and avoided cost estimates are considered.

Request IR-10: Refer to Exhibit E-1, the Application, page 23 of 38, lines 25-26. (a) Please provide the criteria used to categorize each impact category as reliable. (b) Please note for each category's impact how it was measured for Nova...

AI summary The response to Request IR-10 explains that Energy Futures Group (EFG) did not classify data sources as reliable or unreliable but considers referenced data reliable. Reliable data sources include NS Power, government data, and the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The impact categories are based on data from NS Power and EfficiencyOne, with societal impacts informed by updated social cost of carbon guidance.

Request IR-15: Referring to Exhibit E-1, the Report, Page 45 of 68, Table 14, please explain how the percentages in columns 2 and 3 are created – what are the data points that are used to create the percentage? (a) Please explain how the c...

AI summary The response to Request IR-15 explains that the percentages in Table 14 of the EFG Report are based on expert opinion and stakeholder discussions, and are consistent with the NSPM's principles for handling hard-to-quantify impacts. The use of reliable data where available is emphasized, though some impacts may lack current studies.

(a) Summary Table – Canadian Cost Effectiveness Testing Province Primary Test Additional Tests Used Non-Energy Benefits Ontario • In accordance with the IESO's Cost-Effectiveness Guide, the IESO only implements Conservation and Demand Mana...

AI summary The summary table outlines cost-effectiveness testing practices in Ontario for conservation and demand management programs. It highlights the use of the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test and Levelized Unit Energy Cost (LUEC) as primary metrics, along with the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test for internal reporting. Non-energy benefits are now evaluated on a sector level, replacing a 15% benefit adder.

- (b) Energy benefits and net energy benefits are different than electric utility system impacts and incorporate changes to other fuels, in addition to changes to the electric utility system. - (c) The rationale for considering the non-inc...

AI summary The text distinguishes between energy benefits and net energy benefits, noting that they differ from electric utility system impacts by incorporating changes to other fuels. It also explains that non-incentivized measure cost is used as a proxy adder for non-energy benefits in beneficial electrification, as it better represents customer benefits like added cooling or enhanced cooking compared to energy savings.

- (d) No, under the proposed approach of using the non-incentivized measure cost as the basis for calculation, the estimated host customer non-energy benefit would not increase. 1 Request IR-20: 2 3 EFG states that the "consultant team dev...

AI summary The response to IR-20 refers to EfficiencyOne's workpapers for Levelized NEI calculations, while IR-21 questions the resilience benefits of EVs and the materiality of public health impacts. EFG acknowledges insufficient development of vehicle-to-building support in their analysis.

EXPERT TESTIMONY FORUM ON BEHALF OF MATTERS DPU 14-111, Joint Petition by Massachusetts Gas Utilities for Emergency Authorization to plan for a portion of the gas-supply requirements of capacity- exempt transportation customers converting...

AI summary The document lists various regulatory matters and proceedings from different states, including Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire, involving gas utilities, tariff mechanisms, and power supply cost recovery plans. These matters were handled by different public utilities commissions and involved various stakeholders.

Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator PAC Previously reported TRC for info purposes with non-energy benefits based on a 2021 study, which replaced a 15% adder. Enbridge Gas TRC-Plus 15% adder to account for non-energy benefits ef...

AI summary The text discusses various approaches and tests used in energy regulation, including the Program Administrator Cost test (PAC), Total Resource Cost (TRC), and Prescriptive Cost Test (PCT), with examples from different organizations and regulatory decisions.

- benefit of being a key part of the approach needed to fulfill the Board's role under section 79L(4) of - the Act, where it must specifically assess impacts on NS Power's customers. - The PAC test is also beneficial as it permits a BCA as...

AI summary The text argues for the adoption of the PAC test over E1's proposed BCA approach, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and the inclusion of customer incentives. It also criticizes the use of a low discount rate for assessing DSM measures and highlights the importance of including revenue benefits from electrification in the PAC test.

Table 2: Host Customer Non-Energy Impact Proxy Values Host Customer Impact – by measure category and customer segment Non-Income Qualified/Target Market Segment Income Qualified Target Market Segment Building Shell Measures (air sealing, i...

AI summary Table 2 presents proxy values for non-energy benefits (NEBs) associated with various energy efficiency and demand response measures for different customer segments. The values are reduced from the Application's proposed levels, with some measures like Demand Response and Electric Vehicle (managed charging, VtG) having zero proxy values. These proxy values represent an aggregate NEB value and do not quantify individual impacts.

his program does not look great for a utility. And I believe Mr. Neme explained that this will always look bad, but this one looks particularly bad because of the heating, and it drives a lot of peak. [Posterity] came in and oh, and by the...

AI summary The text discusses a program's negative impact on a utility due to heating costs and peak demand. Posterity suggests combining heat pumps with gas peaking to reduce costs and eliminate the need for transmission and distribution infrastructure, resulting in lower net costs and passing a PAC test.

APPENDIX A Category PAC (Program Administrator Cost) Current TRC (Total Resource Cost) NS Power Recommendatio ns E1's Proposed BCA (Nova Scotia Jurisdictional Test) GHG Impacts �Excluded �Excluded Greenhouse �� gas emissions reductions to...

AI summary The table compares different cost categories and their inclusion in the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) and Total Resource Cost (TRC) under various proposals. It discusses the treatment of greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts, other fuel impacts, and host customer costs, with differences in inclusion and evaluation methods between NS Power's recommendations and E1's proposed BCA.

Asset Value New equipment, latest technologies improve asset value Water cost impacts Some efficiency measures also reduce water consumption O&M Costs Energy Efficiency (EE) and Electric Vehicles (EV) typically decrease. Demand Response (D...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of energy efficiency (EE) measures and other programs on asset value, water consumption, operational costs, productivity, economic well-being, comfort, amenity, health and safety, empowerment, and pride. It also critiques the relevance of individual benefits to sustainability goals outlined in legislative amendments, emphasizing the need for empirical support to link these benefits to broader sustainability outcomes.