Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M12550

- 4 (Exhibit N-1), NS Power represents the following table: Title: RTU Replacements Projecution Year: 2025 - 2027 gram – Phas e 6 Meals Units 378 8 40 Sub-Total $ 15,120 $ 15,120 Sub-Total $ 15,120 + Conting gency 1 Contingency 10% $ 3,806...

AI summary The document presents a table from NS Power outlining the costs and details for the RTU Replacements Project from 2025 to 2027, including meals, contingency, interest, overhead, and administrative costs, as well as a request for an itemized equipment list for Phase 6 and Phase 1.

Review of C0051815 - RTU Replacements Program - Phase 6 (NSEB M12550) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests 1 Request IR-9: 15 (ii) Please refer to Attachment 1 for the NS Power Contractor Safety Management 16 Program. The improved i...

AI summary The document outlines NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests regarding the RTU Replacements Program - Phase 6. It mentions internal practices related to safety management and documentation improvements for substation drawings, as well as references to cybersecurity, safety, and quality assurance standards compliance.

7 (c) The detailed site-specific actual unit hours and unit labour costs are not fully available for 8 comparison, primarily because some labour categories such as: Engineering & Design, 9 Drafting, and Project Management are executed in p...

AI summary The document discusses limitations in accessing detailed site-specific labour cost data for RTU installations due to parallel execution of tasks and a cyber incident. However, insights from completed sites have improved resource utilization. Scope revisions also occurred, with details provided in an attachment.

1 NS Power acknowledges that the absence of material lost during the cyber incident resulted in 2 difficulty evidencing the Company's baseline data and resulting project efficiency gains. 3 However, as demonstrated by NS Power's response t...

AI summary NS Power acknowledges challenges in evidencing project efficiency gains due to a cyber incident but asserts that project execution has been largely as planned, demonstrating process maturity. The amended cost estimate reflects lessons learned and improved accuracy based on actual execution data from completed sites.

ctions): 1. Identify the function, bay, or internal asset tag so units can be differentiated. At Page 2 of 3 of the NSPI (NSEB) Undertaking U-6 (Exhibit N-21 of 2025 ACE Plan), NS Power states: Also, because the installations are much broa...

AI summary The text discusses the increased complexity and resource requirements of Phase 6 RTU installations, including the need for dedicated project management, challenges related to remote locations, and workforce constraints. These factors increase labor hours and impact project timelines.

ave set pricing in place to control costs,” and that costs and completion timelines are not materially affected by any outage windows for transmission lines. 5. Similarly, in the 2026 ACE Plan proceeding, NS Power justifies the lack of a r...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's justification for not preparing a risk matrix for the Phase 6 project, citing their experience with transformer addition projects. It also references the Project Delivery Model (PDM) and asks for Midgard’s opinion on the adequacy of risk documentation for RTU replacement projects.