Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Energy Efficiency Budgets" in M12887

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2025 Short Run Marginal Cost (SRMC) Test to Rates Report
5 passages 3 documents

Energy Efficiency Budgets across all matters →

N-1Report 3 passages
Preamble p. pp. 11-12
5 The most recent estimates of daily price elasticities for TOU and Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) 6 domestic rates differ significantly from the long-term price elasticity of -0.15 used in the 2026 7 Annual Load Forecast Report. The daily pr...

AI summary The document discusses the price elasticity of demand under Time-Varying Pricing (TVP) programs, noting that daily price elasticities for TOU and CPP rates differ significantly from long-term estimates. The elasticities were developed based on a small subset of customers and may not be representative of broader consumption patterns. The Company advises caution in extrapolating these findings to annual consumption outcomes and highlights the importance of future monitoring.

Q. How should the SRMC test be used? p. p. 24
.15 -0.15 - - General Demand 2.78% 5.78% 16.52 9.30 77.7% 2,308.0 -0.15 -0.15 - - General Demand Time of Use On-Peak (Winter) 2.78% 5.78% 29.85 14.05 112.4% 0.3 -0.15 -0.15 - - Off-Peak (Winter) 2.78% 5.78% 17.43 10.96 59.0% 0.8 -0.15 -0.1...

AI summary The text presents data on demand and pricing across various sectors and time-of-use categories, including General Demand, MURB, CPP, and different industrial and municipal classifications. It includes metrics such as percentage changes, average costs, and inefficiency estimates related to the Short Run Marginal Cost (SRMC) Test for the year 2025.

Figure 1.2 2025 Base Cost Rate Revenues with DSM, SCRR and 2025 FAM Amounts p. p. 24
Figure 1.2 2025 Base Cost Rate Revenues with DSM, SCRR and 2025 FAM Amounts (Based on 2025 average annual marginal cost of 9.048 cents/kWh) Short Run Marginal Cost Test Inefficient Usage Estimate Sales Price Elasticity-of- Inefficient Usag...

AI summary Figure 1.2 presents 2025 base cost rate revenues with DSM, SCRR, and FAM amounts. It includes data on residential and small general usage, time-of-day pricing, and critical peak pricing, showing variations in costs and sales across different usage periods.

N-2Report - Refiled 1 passage
Preamble p. pp. 11-24
5 The most recent estimates of daily price elasticities for TOU and Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) 6 domestic rates differ significantly from the long-term price elasticity of -0.15 used in the 2026 7 Annual Load Forecast Report. The daily pr...

AI summary The text discusses daily price elasticities for Time-of-Use (TOU) and Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) domestic rates, noting they differ significantly from long-term estimates. The elasticities were developed for a small subset of customers in a TVP pilot program, and the Company cautions against extrapolating these findings to annual consumption outcomes. The discussion has implications for future SRMC tests, as all rate classes passed the SRMC test in 2025.

102465Board letter re: Accepts the 2025 SRMC Test to Rates Report, as refiled in Exhibit N-2 1 passage
Section 2 p. p. 0
ts. NS Power adjusted the 2025 class revenues in the 2026 FAM AA and BA amounts, associated with the cost imbalances incurred as of September 2025. All the tested rate classes passed both SRMC tests. The calculated average annual marginal...

AI summary NS Power adjusted 2025 class revenues in the 2026 FAM AA and BA amounts due to cost imbalances as of September 2025. The average annual marginal cost for 2025 increased by 11.4% to 9.048 cents per kWh, driven by changes in generation, commodity prices, and load growth. NS Power conducted a review of price elasticity for the 2025 SRMC Report, finding notable variations in elasticity for certain rate classes.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →