E-52018 DSM Evaluation Reports
6 passages
8 BER RECOMMENDATIONS The 2018 impact evaluation revealed that the accuracy of reported savings had improved, especially for Mail-in. In addition, ENS has been proactive in adapting their Instant Rebates offerings to the evolving market by...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation highlights improvements in reported savings accuracy for Mail-in and Instant Rebates, but identifies process issues, including overlapping eligibility and limited data tracking. Recommendations focus on aligning BER logic models, improving data systems, connecting participants with non-lighting contractors, and adjusting incentive levels for non-lighting measures with longer payback periods.
Table 1: 2018 Overall Participation and Savings for Custom Incentives Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Custom Energy Savings 14.315 GWh 0.81 11.603 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 69 projects completed 196.661 GWh 0.79 156.07...
AI summary Table 1 presents 2018 participation levels and savings for custom incentives, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings across different programs such as Energy Savings, EMIS, and SEM. The table also includes metrics like NTGR and net savings for each category.
Building Optimization In 2018, six projects were completed through Building Optimization service. The 2018 evaluation included a review of three of those projects for which both a project file review and an on-site visit was conducted. Sim...
AI summary In 2018, six Building Optimization projects were completed, with three reviewed through on-site visits and project file reviews. Participant satisfaction was high, but energy savings were reduced by 39% and peak demand savings by 22% due to engineering errors. The net electrical energy savings were 1.184 GWh, avoiding 725 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emissions.
Table 9: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Retrofit Partial Savings Final Savings for Projects Started and Completed in 2018 Final Savings for Multi-year Projects Total Number of Projects 9 44 14 67 Energy Savings Tracked Gr...
AI summary Table 9 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for retrofit projects, including data on the number of projects, energy savings tracked and adjusted at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings with adjustments. This data provides a comprehensive overview of energy efficiency outcomes from 2018 and multi-year projects.
[ Do not read: ] - 98. Don't know - 99. Refused [ASK ALL] Q15. Are you a member of the ENS Efficiency Trade Network (ETN)? Why or why not? [ASK ALL] Q16. What, if any, professional associations or groups should ENS be reaching out to to in...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at participants regarding their involvement with ENS's Efficiency Trade Network, potential professional associations to engage with for program participation, and additional training or certifications related to energy management and efficient design.
P5. Now thinking specifically abo out the support given by the serv vice provider a) Can you describe how the in previous years? e service provider was helpful in maintaining the energy conserva ation measures put in place , . 0 where 1 is...
AI summary The text includes a table with questions regarding the effectiveness of service providers in maintaining energy conservation measures and interactive effects on energy consumption. It asks for ratings on a scale from 1 to 10 and includes notes on seasonal and production variables impacting energy use.