Topic:"Energy Efficiency Conservation Agreement" in M12780

Table 7: Demand Response 2027-2031 Demand Response 2028 3.1 2029 4.1 Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 2030 4.4 2031 4.2 2027-2031 18.7 2027 0.2 2028 0.2 Small General (10) 2029 0.2 2030 0.2 2031 0.2 2027-2031 1.1 2027 1.4 2028 1.3 General (1...

AI summary The document presents a table outlining projected demand response (DR) participation across various sectors from 2027 to 2031, including residential, small and large general, industrial, municipal, and unmetered categories. It also outlines the structure of an innovation plan under DSM Enabling Strategies, including governance, project classification, and focus areas.

Table 1 Update on Implementation of 2022-2023 Evaluation Recommendations Year Evaluation/ Verification Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Expected Period of Completion wattage when information is not available from the participant....

AI summary The text provides an update on the implementation of 2022-2023 evaluation recommendations, focusing on the use of wattage information and product categorization in energy efficiency programs. It highlights the shift from manual determination by model number to automated methods.

Table 69: Overall 2025 Existing Residential Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit AMH Electrical Energy Savings 98 Projects 1.378 GWh 1.00 1.378 GWh Li...

AI summary Table 69 outlines the participation levels and savings across various residential programs in 2025, including energy savings, GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life for each program category such as AMH, ASFH, EPI, and Green Heat. The table provides data on gross and net savings, highlighting the impact of these programs on energy efficiency and emissions reduction.

Table 10: Example of a 2025 True-up Adjustment 2024 2025 Total Tracked Savings (kWh) 105,187 63,884 169,071 Year-specific Adjustment Ratio 1.021 1.003 Revised Savings Prior to True-up (kWh) 107,396 64,076 171,472 Total Project Revised Savi...

AI summary Table 10 shows a 2025 true-up adjustment example, illustrating tracked savings, adjustment ratios, and revised savings. Table 11 builds on this by applying adjustment ratios and true-up adjustments to Retrofit projects' energy and peak demand savings. Line loss factors from NS Power's 2014 study are used for calculations, with assumptions for municipal utilities.

Summary [Table](#page-79-1) 356 presents a summary of the values used to calculate server virtualization and decommissioning savings. The detailed methodology follows.

AI summary Table 356 summarizes the values used to calculate server virtualization and decommissioning savings, with a detailed methodology provided afterward.

ynapse Energy Economics for NRDC. Hopkins, A. S., A. Napoleon, K. Takahashi. 2021. A Framework for Long-Term Gas Utility Planning in Colorado. Synapse Energy Economics for the Colorado Energy Office. Hopkins, A. S., A. Napoleon, T. Woolf,...

AI summary The text lists various publications by Synapse Energy Economics for different organizations and projects, including energy planning, utility resilience, and energy efficiency programs. These publications are related to long-term planning, energy equity, and performance evaluation in the energy sector.

ng homes, furthering the strong example of what can be achieved when our Mi'kmaw communities and provincial partners work together to address energy affordability, housing quality, and climate action. The Assembly was encouraged to see the...

AI summary The Opening Statement highlights a forward-looking plan transitioning from retrofits to new residential construction with solar PV incentives, emphasizing energy affordability, housing quality, and climate action. It also notes increased support for community-led initiatives, such as heat pump maintenance and energy advisor certification, in the 2027–2031 Demand Side Management Plan.

ome households. We oppose E1's decision to omit strategic electrification except through enabling strategies. We are in the throes of the biggest transition in our energy system in over 100 years. Electric equipment provides energy-enabled...

AI summary The Affordable Energy Coalition (AEC) opposes E1's exclusion of strategic electrification from enabling strategies, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to energy affordability. They argue that electrification, such as heat pumps, benefits low and moderate income households and support specific low-income and equity energy savings programs in the E1 proposal.

is not acceptable. 2. The Affordable Energy Coalition supports including substantial strategic electrification in the E1 contract, especially for low and modest income households. We oppose E1's decision to omit strategic electrification e...

AI summary The Affordable Energy Coalition supports including strategic electrification in the E1 contract, especially for low and modest income households, arguing that electrification can save money and improve efficiency. They also support specific low-income and equity energy savings programs in the E1 proposal.