E-3E1 (NSPI) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-69
142 passages
N/A N/A Total 34.2 181.4 124.1 1819.6 33.5 2.1 5.3 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2022 a Savings at Demand Savings b Administrator ($ million) ($ million) E...
AI summary The text presents a table with financial and energy metrics, including investment figures, lifetime benefits, annual energy savings, and cost tests (TRC and PAC). It appears to evaluate program performance and resource allocation, focusing on energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms.
N/A N/A Total 27.1 132.4 97.8 1421.9 22.2 2.1 4.9 Incremental Incremental Lifetime Energy Annual Net Program Investment Lifetime Benefits Annual Net Total Resource 2022 a Savings at Demand Savings b Administrator ($ million) ($ million) En...
AI summary The text presents a table with financial and energy data, including investment, benefits, energy savings, and cost tests related to programs. It includes metrics such as lifetime energy savings, annual net demand savings, and program administrator details.
Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.1 4.5 7.0 56.0 0.6 1.1 2.1 Existing Residential 6.3 42.2 23.8 372.7 8.5 2.5 6.7 New Residential 2.6 13.0 5.2 158.1 1.5 1.7 5.0 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient Pr...
AI summary The text presents a table detailing various residential and business DSM programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation, along with their associated costs and participation metrics. It highlights the distribution of program costs and participation across different categories.
Generator (GWh) (MW) 2020 27.1 128.2 99.8 1433.0 22.3 2.0 4.7 2021 27.1 132.4 97.8 1421.9 22.2 2.1 4.9 2022 26.8 136.2 94.5 1408.5 21.7 2.1 5.1 Total 81.0 396.8 292.0 4263.4 66.2 2.1 4.9 aLifetime benefits are expressed as the net present...
AI summary The text provides data on generator output in gigawatt-hours (GWh) and megawatts (MW) for the years 2020 to 2022, including totals. It also defines terms such as 'Lifetime benefits,' 'TRC,' and 'PAC,' which are used to evaluate the net present value of avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios in energy efficiency programs.
enhancements are 28 detailed in Appendix A – Section 4 on a program by program basis and BNI Sector 29 enhancements detailed in Appendix A – Section 5 on a program by program basis. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-14 Page 1 of...
AI summary The document outlines program cost breakdowns for EfficiencyOne's energy efficiency initiatives, including Efficient Product Rebates, Residential programs, and BNI Sector enhancements, with details provided for 2016-2018, 2019, and 2020-2022.
lication pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities. Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Impl...
AI summary The document outlines the filing of an incentive setting methodology related to electricity efficiency and conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act. It includes a report by CLEAResult and an implementation plan by EfficiencyOne, submitted for approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement.
9 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's incentive setting methodology filing, which is part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency programs and customer incentives.
24 EfficiencyOne’s current incentive setting practices. 25 4. Application of CLEAResult’s findings, in a detailed quantitative manner, 26 to two Efficiency Nova Scotia programs: Custom Retrofit and Instant 27 Savings. 2 M06733, NSUARB Orde...
AI summary The document discusses EfficiencyOne’s current incentive setting practices and the application of CLEAResult’s findings to two Efficiency Nova Scotia programs: Custom Retrofit and Instant Savings. It references a 2015 order related to the approval of a Demand Side Management Resource Plan and a supply agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated.
inciples, conduct a program financial 17 simulation of all of the current incentives in the programs to 18 evaluate their current levels. 7 7 Ibid. DATE FILED: June 30, 2016 Page 5 of 13 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment...
AI summary The document discusses the need to evaluate current incentive levels in programs through a financial simulation, citing a reference to a prior document. EfficiencyOne's methodology filing is mentioned.
, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary This document is an incentive setting methodology filing by EfficiencyOne, submitted in 2019 as part of a regulatory proceeding related to demand-side management programs.
29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne incentive setting methodology filing (E-ENS-R-16), submitted by NS Power in 2019. It details the approach for setting incentives under the EfficiencyOne program, a key aspect of demand-side management in Nova Scotia.
Executive Summary As a result of the regulatory process for the 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, EfficiencyOne was asked to review its current incentive level setting methodology. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Boa...
AI summary EfficiencyOne was asked to review its incentive level setting methodology following the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process. The UARB requested a quantitative analysis to assess whether incentive levels are set appropriately. CLEAResult was retained to examine methodologies from other jurisdictions and develop a comprehensive approach for Efficiency Nova Scotia’s programs.
206 Project Methodology To produce recommendations for an incentive level setting methodology based on industry best practices, CLEAResult undertook the following steps: Jurisdictional Scans CLEAResult undertook jurisdictional scans of var...
AI summary CLEAResult conducted jurisdictional scans to identify best practices in incentive level setting methodologies for energy efficiency programs. The scans focused on provinces and states with similar geography, mature portfolios, and recognized market leadership. Both primary and secondary research were used to gather insights and validate findings.
in public documents. The best practices were reviewed by the CLEAResult Subject Matter Expert (SME) team, which has significant experience in program design, delivery and evaluation. The result of the jurisdictional scans, contained in App...
AI summary The CLEAResult SME team reviewed best practices for energy efficiency programs, benchmarking ENS’s incentives and performance. Jurisdictional scans identified considerations for incentive setting, which were integrated into recommendations. The study also analyzed Nova Scotia’s energy market, demographics, and regulatory structure to tailor findings to the local context.
These incentives can be used in isolation, or in combination with each other, depending on the specific barriers present. All three types of incentives should aim to alleviate barriers to participation. Often, the main component of utility...
AI summary The text discusses the use of financial and convenience incentives in energy conservation programs to overcome cost and time barriers for participants. Financial incentives are a major component of program budgets, with some jurisdictions requiring that program administration costs be minimized to ensure participants receive the majority of benefits.
d technical assistance incentives. These incentives address the lack of knowledge barrier. From posting energy savings tips and a home energy assessment tool on a public website to providing residential and commercial on-site energy assess...
AI summary Educational and technical assistance incentives are crucial for overcoming knowledge barriers in energy efficiency programs. These incentives range from online tools to on-site assessments and are tied to energy savings in some cases. They support market transformation by encouraging participation in energy conservation initiatives.
arget budget and cost effectiveness thresholds When considering the inclusion of a While NYSERDA will typically cap commercial incentive Program administrators identify the measure in programs, efficiency rates at 50% of project costs, it...
AI summary The text discusses considerations for setting incentive rates in energy efficiency programs, noting that while typical caps are 50% of project costs, agricultural customers may receive up to 70% due to policy goals and other factors. It also references a data analysis phase and model incentive rates.
nditure for 2016, 2017, and 2018 were as follows: Year Annual Savings (GWh) Expenditure ($ million) Unit Cost ($/kWh) 2016 139.9 $50.5 $0.36/kWh 2017 141.7 $50.0 $0.35/kWh 2018 136.2 $52.4 $0.38/kWh Total 417.8 $152.9 $0.37/kWh Table 10: N...
AI summary The table summarizes energy efficiency expenditure and savings from 2016 to 2018, showing annual savings in gigawatt-hours and expenditure in millions of dollars, along with unit costs per kilowatt-hour.
ve levels) to adjust for annual variations in the avoided costs. Deployment of specific programs or measures can take advantage of annual variations, but it is difficult to apply this approach to an entire portfolio. Other jurisdictions, s...
AI summary The text discusses the challenge of adjusting for annual variations in avoided costs and how other jurisdictions, like Oregon, address this by aligning with energy efficiency policy and portfolio savings goals. It also notes that ENS is investigating the recognition of local avoided costs and the consideration of discount and premium zones for electricity conservation.
Commercial, institutional and industrial customers are eligible to apply to the Custom Program for measures or projects that do not fit under a prescriptive project stream. Scoping and/or Feasibility studies have to be conducted before the...
AI summary The Custom Program allows commercial, institutional, and industrial customers to apply for energy efficiency measures not covered by standard project streams. Projects require scoping or feasibility studies, and incentives are calculated based on various factors. Interest-free financing is available, and there are specialized components for compressed air and recommissioning services.
payback, and unit cost), up to a maximum of $25,000 per building. Customers can access other programs for the other energy savings opportunities. For commercial and industrial customers planning a new build, a building expansion or a major...
AI summary The ENS program offers financial assistance and support for energy efficiency initiatives in commercial and industrial buildings, including design assistance, incentives for equipment, and access to energy management systems. The program also provides multi-year financing and support for strategic energy management approaches.
considerations on funding caps will also be developed at both the owner and project levels (i.e. restricting the amount of funding for any one landlord or project).21 21 Email Communication from EfficiencyOne Program Management Staff – May...
AI summary The text discusses considerations on funding caps for energy efficiency programs, restricting the amount of funding available to any one landlord or project. It references an email communication from EfficiencyOne Program Management Staff dated May 25, 2016.
2) Residential customers receive incentives for installing eligible measures. The incentive is typically 15-25 percent of the project costs. 1) For efficiency projects, commercial and 1) Commercial and industrial customers receive industri...
AI summary Residential customers receive incentives of 15-25% for installing eligible energy efficiency measures. Commercial and industrial customers face challenges with upfront capital and lack of education about energy efficiency projects. The midstream application involves distributors educating contractors, who influence customer awareness and adoption of energy efficiency practices.
al expensiveness, and can set the upper boundary of an acceptable price range for consumers. Figure 7: Van Westerndorp’s Price Sensitivity Meter23 While this analysis is not exact, it provides a useful reference point for setting incentive...
AI summary The text discusses methods for determining acceptable pricing ranges for consumer incentives, specifically using Van Westerndorp’s Price Sensitivity Meter and Conjoint Analysis. These tools help evaluate how different attributes influence consumer value and identify appropriate incentive levels.
$0.50/kWh Equipment Purchase Residential Customer, Large Purchase $/kWh $1.00/kWh $0.50/kWh Commercial and Industrial Small Business $/kWh, Total $1.00/kWh $0.75/kWh Customer, Direct Install Incentive Commercial Customer, Small Purchase at...
AI summary The text presents a table outlining various incentive thresholds and rates for different customer categories and equipment purchases under a program budget. It specifies different rates and incentives for residential, commercial, and industrial customers based on the type and scale of purchase.
d retail prices and the incremental equipment costs because customer contribution caps are rarely reached in the commercial sector programs, so the protection is rarely encountered. 57 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1...
AI summary The text discusses the Custom Program, highlighting that customer contribution caps in commercial sector programs are rarely reached, and outlines CLEAResult's recommendations for current and future activities.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 75 of 206 for incentive level setting and understanding customer motivation barriers. Through ongoing program management efforts, the limited uptake in the low cost financing offer indicates that direct fin...
AI summary The document discusses the limited uptake in low-cost financing offers for energy efficiency programs, suggesting that direct financial incentives are more effective than financing solutions. Larger Custom Retrofit projects show a 10% uptake in financing, whereas smaller projects and residential sectors do not show similar results. The small business sector has seen significant financing uptake in the past.
erved for smaller Custom projects or the residential sector. The small business sector has seen a significant uptake in financing in the past, Through the delivery of the Custom Compressed Air Optimization service, customers frequently ide...
AI summary The document discusses the Custom Compressed Air Optimization service and the Custom Retrofit program, highlighting the introduction of educational incentives to address knowledge gaps and the adjustment of incentive rates based on program experience and customer feedback.
Savings, Price and Market Below are two examples for large savings opportunities Penetration provided with Nova Scotia’s market characteristics in mind: 1. Space cooling systems that feature direct expansion technology, either through ince...
AI summary The text outlines two examples of large savings opportunities in Nova Scotia, focusing on space cooling systems with direct expansion technology and electric baseboard heating systems, particularly for controls installation and major renovations, to assist in setting incentive levels.
68 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 85 of 206 Incentive Level-Setting Excel-Based Tool for Review Protocol To assist with determining incentive levels, CLEAResult has developed an Excel-based tool (which is provi...
AI summary CLEAResult has developed an Excel-based tool to assist in determining incentive levels for energy efficiency programs. The tool requires inputs such as sector, program delivery channel, financial motivation for participants, and financial impact, and provides considerations for setting incentive levels. It does not offer specific financial recommendations.
25% Lamp ENERGY STAR® LED $30.00 $7.00 $20.50 $25.00 $20.00 $20.50 Yes 20% Specialty Lamp ENERGY STAR® LED $45.00 $20.20 $44.30 $45.00 $33.00 $44.30 Yes 27% Recessed Downlight Not Not Not ENERGY STAR® LED Included Included Included $45.00...
AI summary The text presents a table listing various energy-efficient products along with their costs, including prices for ENERGY STAR® LED lamps, recessed downlights, dimmer switches, motion sensors, power bars, and timers. The table includes details such as manufacturer's suggested retail price, program administrator cost, total resource cost, and rebate amounts.
historical expenditures, the costs for program administration have been between 20-30 percent of the total expenditure. Therefore, the incentive expenditure, on a $/kWh basis is as follows: Program Budget Incentive Level Parameter Threshol...
AI summary The text discusses historical program administration costs, which have ranged between 20-30% of total expenditures for the Instant Savings Program. It provides incentive expenditure levels per kWh based on different program administration cost assumptions.
16.49 20 $24,106 Retrofit Track Table 27: Parameters for Average Custom Retrofit Project Cost to Customer Incentive Level Threshold As discussed in the Financial Impact Analysis section of the General Principles recommendations, a program...
AI summary The text discusses the parameters for the Average Custom Retrofit Project, including the cost to customer incentive level threshold. It recommends that EfficiencyOne start determining incremental costs for each project. The cost to customer threshold is not breached for either the project cost or the simple payback period.
re different than the project costs, and play more of a factor in equipment replacement decisions, versus new purchase, The program budget incentive level threshold is not exceeded. Finally, for projects where the energy savings persistenc...
AI summary The text discusses considerations for adjusting energy program incentives based on energy savings persistence and project costs. It also includes jurisdictional scans comparing Nova Scotia and Ontario in terms of peak load, population served, and electricity generation sources.
ency Maine) 1,863 MW 1.33 million Gas, Coal, Petroleum-Fired Massachusetts (National Grid) 13,128 MW ≈1.1 million Natural Gas, Nuclear Peak for all of state Table 32: Jurisdiction Overview Current Annual Annual Unit Cost Target per Residen...
AI summary The table provides an overview of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia and Ontario, including annual savings targets, budgets, and incentive percentages. Nova Scotia's program (ENS) has a target of 135.3 GWh with a budget of $34.05 million and a 70% incentive rate. Ontario's program has a larger target of 1,450 GWh with a budget of $366.67 million.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 99 of 206 Current Annual Annual Unit Cost Target per Residential Jurisdiction Framework Savings Budget ($ % Incentive of Savings Retail Retail...
AI summary The text presents energy efficiency program data, including savings targets, budgets, and unit costs from various jurisdictions such as the Energy Trust of Oregon and New York (ConEd), with references to EEPS and EEPS II programs.
range in size. The two largest LDCs are Toronto Hydro and Hydro One, both with over 500,000 customers. In comparison, Atikokan Hydro, one of the smallest LDCs, has just over 1,600 customers. Electricity Generation Ontario is a summer peaki...
AI summary The text discusses the size of LDCs in Ontario, highlighting Toronto Hydro and Hydro One as the largest with over 500,000 customers, and Atikokan Hydro as one of the smallest with just over 1,600 customers. It also outlines Ontario's electricity generation, consumption by sector, and the history of energy efficiency programs in the province.
Kilowatt Counts”), an appliance retirement program (“The Great Refrigerator Round up”) and a business incentive program delivered through multiple partners (“ERIP”, “BOMA”, “MEER”). Cost Effectiveness Testing In their conservation (CDM) pl...
AI summary The text discusses cost effectiveness testing for conservation programs, including the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administrator Cost (PAC), with specific exceptions for low-income programs. It also outlines avoided costs for electricity, such as avoided capacity and energy costs, and includes a 15% adder for societal benefits. The IESO is highlighted as responsible for maintaining cost effectiveness across programs.
ht to consider is that retailers need six to eight months advance notice for incentive level changes, so analysis and recommendations have to be conducted with this structural issue in mind. Recently, the Retrofit program approved new ince...
AI summary The text discusses the structural challenge of requiring six to eight months of advance notice for incentive level changes in energy programs. It references the recent approval of new incentive levels for the prescriptive lighting track in the Retrofit program, which involved analyzing historical participation data, future impacts on uptake, budget, and cost effectiveness.
chment 1 Page 107 of 206 participants; and analyzing what future impacts would be on uptake, the budget and cost effectiveness based on current and future participation trends. ONTARIO CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Curr...
AI summary The text discusses Ontario's conservation programs, which cover various sectors and include financial incentives, coaching, assessments, and training initiatives. Ontario has conducted rigorous evaluations of its programs, leading to higher energy efficiency baselines. A new pay-for-performance framework for LDC funding of Conservation Program delivery was recently released.
ial performance track provides $500 or $1,000 per New Business home for obtaining the appropriate Energuide Construction rating. Incentives were set based on attracting builder to consider program for additional electricity efficiency meas...
AI summary The document outlines incentive programs for energy efficiency in new and retrofit construction, offering financial support to businesses based on Energuide ratings and upfront costs. These programs aim to encourage the adoption of energy-efficient measures in commercial and industrial sectors.
Incentives were set based on kW or kWh savings https://saveonen realized, with lighting savings receiving a lower ergy.ca/Busines incentive rate than non-lighting savings to s/Program- encourage greater penetration of the latter Overviews/...
AI summary Incentive rates for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia have been updated, removing the $/kW rate and introducing cost sharing for more expensive measures. Lighting efficiency incentives are lower than non-lighting to encourage broader adoption. An M&V Plan is required for approval, ensuring cost-effectiveness from the program administrator's perspective.
program were updated to include cost sharing for certain measures that were more expensive on a savings delivered basis. https://saveonen Incentives are based on the lower of the price of ergy.ca/Busines the equipment supply and installati...
AI summary The program has been updated to include cost sharing for more expensive energy-saving measures. Incentives are based on the lower of the equipment cost or a prescribed rate per kWh saved, with the customer covering the remaining cost if the incentive rate is the limiting factor. The program continues to offer free lighting assessments.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 109 of 206 This program provides funding for hiring an Energy Manager for larger commercial or industrial customers. https://saveonen The incen...
AI summary This program offers funding for hiring Energy Managers by larger commercial or industrial customers, with options for guaranteed salary or pay for performance based on realized energy savings. The pay for performance option is set at $40/MWh, and annual savings targets are provided to ensure program cost-effectiveness.
Managers.aspx Energy Managers are provided annual savings targets which help with program cost effectiveness. https://saveonen ergy.ca/Busines s/Program- This program is targeted towards large customers, Overviews/Proc Process & including...
AI summary The Energy Managers program sets annual savings targets for large customers, including transmission-connected ones, with incentive funding based on the lower of three options: a prescribed incentive rate, a 40% project cost cap, or an incentive to achieve a one-year payback. The program is part of the Industrial Accelerator Program and includes process and system upgrades.
and social benefits Costs Under the TRC-plus test include: Costs incurred by program participants (incremental costs) Costs of running the energy efficiency programs (delivery and administration costs) 100 We change the way people use...
AI summary The TRC-plus test includes costs incurred by program participants and the costs of running energy efficiency programs, such as delivery and administration costs. The document also mentions incentive rate setting.
Union Gas is responsible for setting incentive levels for their programs. Periodic reviews of the appropriateness of incentive levels is conducted and adjustments to financial incentives are made. Below is an overview of the process employ...
AI summary Union Gas sets incentive levels for their programs through a process involving market research, technical reference manuals, benchmarking, and incremental cost design. This ensures that incentives are appropriate and aligned with market conditions and other jurisdictions.
me-reno - Water Heater: $200 - Window: $40 per window https://www.uni ongas.com/busi ness/save- money-and- Resource energy/space- Acquisition heating- programs https://www.uni Program provides customers rebates for ongas.com/busi a list of...
AI summary The document outlines a program that provides rebates to customers for the installation of efficient technologies and equipment, including examples such as water heaters and windows, with links to additional information.
eck link for list of measures and ness/save- C&I Prescriptive technologies and equipment. incentives money-and- energy/water- heating- programs https://www.uni ongas.com/busi ness/save- money-and- energy/cooking -programs This program is s...
AI summary This text discusses a program that provides incentives for commercial and industrial customers based on overall energy efficiency measures, with contract customers eligible for up to $100,000 in incentives. The program is similar to other incentive-based initiatives and includes links to additional information.
ntract customers: $0.10 up to $100,000 https://www.uni C&I Custom provides incentives based on overall ongas.com/busi 102 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 119 of 206 natural gas savings realized by the - General...
AI summary The text outlines incentive structures for natural gas savings, with different rates for contract and general service customers, and references a project cost limit of 50 percent. The document also includes a URL and a page number from a filing dated March 29, 2019.
https://www.uni This program provides large volume ongas.com/busi customers with technical support and ness/save- Large Volume - Check link for details customer training along with financial money-and- incentives for energy saving projects...
AI summary The program offers technical support, customer training, and financial incentives for energy-saving projects to large volume customers. The Strategic Energy Management initiative focuses on long-term energy savings for large customers, with incentives supporting start-up costs and measured energy efficiency.
INCENTIVE LEVEL-SETTING METHODOLOGY The following is a rough sketch of what we have seen in other territories. BC Hydro is responsible for setting incentive levels for their programs and introducing new measures and programs. This is perfo...
AI summary This text outlines BC Hydro's methodology for setting incentive levels for energy efficiency programs. It includes benchmarking against other jurisdictions, market research, use of technical reference manuals, and incremental cost design to determine appropriate incentives for customers.
Energy Management management which produces a detailed report that highlights Assessment areas of opportunities within your organization (Commercial) Working together with BC Hydro to provide you with resources to Program implement recom...
AI summary The text describes an energy management program that includes assessments, benchmarking, and studies to help organizations identify energy efficiency opportunities. It outlines eligibility criteria and available study types, such as site investigations and audits, targeting industrial customers with high energy consumption.
that use 500 megawatt-hours or more electricity per year o Eligible technologies are: Compressed Air Systems between 40 and 200 horsepower; and/or Industrial Lighting Distribution: Customers that use more than one gigawatt-hour of electr...
AI summary The text outlines eligibility criteria and funding coverage for various industrial energy efficiency projects, including compressed air systems, industrial lighting, and new plant designs, based on electricity usage and potential energy savings.
Community Energy & Emissions Plan (CEEP): Intended for improved energy management and it can be used to foster green economic development in the community Community Energy Manager (CEM): Funding for a dedicated staff resource within lo...
AI summary The text outlines several initiatives under the Sustainable Communities Program, including the Community Energy & Emissions Plan, Community Energy Manager, Local Area Plan, and Project Implementation Pilot. These initiatives aim to improve energy management, reduce emissions, and promote sustainable development. A Business Energy Advisor will also engage with businesses to identify energy-saving opportunities.
and identify energy saving opportunities for both electricity and natural gas. Business Energy Advisors will also introduce applicable incentives for upgrading to energy Advisors efficient technologies to better understand consumption as w...
AI summary The text discusses the role of Business Energy Advisors in identifying energy-saving opportunities and introducing incentives for upgrading to efficient technologies, as well as promoting energy-saving behaviors for businesses.
Commercial 15.62 Industrial 12.34 Table 34: Average Retail Rates California - 2014 CALIFORNIA ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE & COST EFFECTIVENESS POLICY California has long been recognized as one of the leading jurisdiction in North A...
AI summary The text discusses California's energy efficiency programs and the regulatory framework established by the CPUC, including the implementation of a 'Rolling Target' system for setting annual budgets and long-term forecasts. The CPUC requires IOUs to submit annual budgets and business plans every five years. The text also mentions a commitment to fund approximately $1B in ratepayer funds for energy efficiency and conservation programs.
PG&E 2013-2015 Incentive-to-Administrative Spending Ratios 2013 2014 2015 TRC 1.33 1.38 N/A PAC 2.36 2.18 N/A 120 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 137 of 206 FUTURE TARGETS Bel...
AI summary The document outlines PG&E's incentive-to-administrative spending ratios for the years 2013 to 2015 and discusses the formation of PG&E’s Energy Efficiency Products organization to standardize and streamline energy efficiency measures. It also references future energy efficiency targets submitted to the CPUC.
.03 Industrial 5.79 8.55 ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON STRUCTURE AND FUNDING9 History In 1999, Oregon lawmakers and citizens envisioned a future with Oregon homes and businesses powered by clean, affordable energy. They established stable, consis...
AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon was established in 1999 to promote clean and affordable energy through energy efficiency and renewable resources. It began operations in 2002, funded by customers of four utilities across two states, and is tasked with delivering cost-effective energy solutions with low administrative costs and high customer satisfaction.
inistrative and program support costs and maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction. Customers of four utilities in two states now fund and directly benefit from Energy Trust programs. Energy Trust of Oregon Funding Through state le...
AI summary The text discusses how Energy Trust of Oregon is funded through a public purpose charge collected from customers of four utilities in Oregon. The funds support energy efficiency, renewable energy, and low-income housing programs, with Energy Trust acting as an independent third party approved by the OPUC.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 149 of 206 COST EFFECTIVENESS – NATURAL GAS The current market condition for natural gas prices (i.e., low price environment) has caused the En...
AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon uses a Total Resource Cost (TRC) guideline to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of natural gas efficiency measures. Measures with a TRC of 1.0 or higher are prioritized, while those with lower TRC values may be exceptions or excluded unless justified. This approach helps maintain program infrastructure and momentum until gas prices rise.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 151 of 206 Overall, it was commented that the process of setting incentives is “more of an art than a science” and determining the ideal incent...
AI summary The text discusses the challenge of setting energy efficiency incentives, noting that it is more of an art than a science. It mentions the Energy Trust's guidelines for maximum LUEC and annual performance measures set by commissions, including specific targets for utilities in Oregon.
mes HVAC Install Income Energy Efficiency Equipment Rebate Gas Efficiency 2009 765 N/A N/A N/A N/A
AI summary The document includes a table with data related to energy efficiency programs, including HVAC installation income and rebates for energy efficiency equipment and gas efficiency, with values provided for the year 2009.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 161 of 206 customers with old window or http://www.coned.com/energyefficiency/residential_bounty_program.as wall or air conditioning units. p R...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency programs offered by Con Edison, including rebates for residential and business customers for upgrading to energy-efficient appliances and installing thermostats, along with additional incentives for existing smart thermostats.
Rebates for lighting and controls http://cdn.platform.honestbuildings.com/wp- content/uploads/sites/5/2016/02/Lighting-and-LEDs_v14.pdf HVAC, furnaces, boilers and chillers http://cdn.platform.honestbuildings.com/wp- content/uploads/sites/...
AI summary The document outlines prescriptive rebate programs available to commercial and industrial customers for upgrading equipment such as lighting, HVAC systems, furnaces, boilers, motors, and VFDs. Rebates are capped at 50% or specific monetary limits, and a TRC test is required to ensure the benefit exceeds the costs.
gas for HVAC and VFD projects, whichever is less. TRC test is required and the benefit must be greater than costs. Commercial All C&I custom measures incented at $0.16 per kWh. Additional bonus incentives on super-efficient chillers. Gas i...
AI summary The document outlines various incentive programs for commercial and industrial customers to upgrade energy-efficient equipment and conduct energy studies. Incentives include performance-based rewards, gas and electric rebates, and funding for energy efficiency studies. The Total Resource Cost (TRC) test is a requirement for eligibility, ensuring that the benefits of the measures exceed their costs.
rate in the state of New York. Customers of these utilities are eligible for their own utility programs as well as NYSERDA programs. Double-dipping of incentives by customers is not allowed. Central Hudson (Central Hudson Gas & Electric...
AI summary The text lists electricity generation sources in New York in 2013, highlighting the contribution of various resources such as natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, and renewables. It also mentions utility companies in New York and notes that customers are eligible for both utility and NYSERDA programs, with a prohibition on double-dipping of incentives.
he following are the retail prices for Con Edison customers in 2014: Residential: $0.2885/kWh Commercial: $0.2216/kWh Industrial: $0.2018/kWh NYSERDA ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS POLICY Cost Effectivenes...
AI summary The text provides retail electricity prices for Con Edison customers in 2014 and discusses NYSERDA's energy efficiency programs under the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS). It outlines cost-effectiveness testing using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and the calculation of avoided supply costs provided by the NY-ISO. Energy efficiency programs are funded over three-year cycles and cover residential and commercial sectors.
Rebates are paid after purchase and submission of mont.com/rebates Equipment rebate form. Certain products are qualified through a qualifying product list or through provided specifications. 163 We change the way people use energy Date Fil...
AI summary The document outlines rebate and incentive programs for energy-efficient lighting products, including CFLs and LEDs, with minimum price requirements and incentives provided at participating retailers.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 185 of 206 the state’s electric utilities to collect the applicable budget from their customers and remit it to the Trust for its programs. An...
AI summary The text discusses the funding and evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Maine, emphasizing that energy efficiency is the lowest-cost energy resource. It mentions the role of the MPUC in approving budgets and the use of various funding sources, including ratepayer contributions and market revenues.
gure 63: Natural Gas and All Fuels Program Expenditures 2015 12 176 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 193 of 206
AI summary The text includes a figure titled 'Natural Gas and All Fuels Program Expenditures 2015' and mentions a document filed by NS Power on March 29, 2019. It also references a page number and attachment information.
furnace/boiler) Ultra-low GHG whole house heating systems: 33 percent, up to $5,000 (eligible biomass boilers/furnaces)
AI summary The text outlines incentives for ultra-low GHG whole house heating systems, specifically biomass boilers/furnaces, with a 33 percent discount up to $5,000.
systems: 33 percent, up to $5,000 (eligible biomass boilers/furnaces) Custom projects: Tier 1 incentive: Achieve a minimum of 20 percent projected whole energy savings through any combination of savings measures and receive $1,000 per buil...
AI summary The text outlines incentive structures for energy efficiency projects, including tiered incentives based on projected energy savings. Tier 1 provides $1,000 per building for 20% savings, and Tier 2 provides $1,500 per building for 40% savings, with each incentive capped at one-third of the total project cost.
per building, representing no more than 1/3 of total project cost PACE and unsecured energy loans: Available to most home owners, up to 15 year repayment period, fixed rate of 4.99APR, transferrable with property sale, range of loans from...
AI summary The text outlines financing options for energy efficiency improvements, including PACE and unsecured energy loans with specific terms such as repayment periods, interest rates, and loan amounts. Additional incentives are available for specific utility customers.
Commercial Heat Pump For businesses that are looking to Ductless heat pumps: $500 to $1,250 Program upgrade their heating and cooling system with highly efficient products. http://www.efficiencymaine.com/at- work/commercial-heat-pump-progr...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency programs in Maine, including the Commercial Heat Pump Program, Large Customer Program, and Advanced Building Program, each offering financial incentives for businesses and property owners to upgrade to efficient heating and cooling systems and achieve significant energy savings.
enerated comes from large scale generators and CHP units, while the rest comes from electric utilities. The majority of generators participate in ISO-New England’s capacity market. MASSACHUSETTS ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST...
AI summary Massachusetts leads in energy efficiency, with utilities required to prioritize cost-effective programs under the Green Communities Act. The state's 2016-2018 plan targets 4,122 GWh of savings, funded by sources like the Systems Benefit Charge, Forward Capacity Market, and cap and trade programs. 10% of the budget must support low-income initiatives.
ling Income thermostat ( up to $100) and programmable thermostats (up to $25)
AI summary The text mentions income-related rebates for thermostats, including up to $100 for standard thermostats and up to $25 for programmable thermostats.
Roof upgrades ($3.00/sqft), exterior walls ($3.50/sqft) and basement insulation ($2.00/sqft) to perform better than current building code http://www.mass Deep Energy Performance incentive of $1.75 per CFM reduced save.com/en/res Reside...
AI summary The text outlines various residential energy efficiency programs, including incentives for roof upgrades, exterior wall insulation, and basement insulation, as well as performance-based rebates and access to financing options like the HEAT Loan Program. It also mentions the availability of online or mail-in rebate submissions and links to additional resources.
http://www.mass save.com/en/res idential/offers/rn c-performance- path Provides incentives for lighting and lighting controls, variable speed drives, food service equipment, gas-fired heating and water heating equipment through online or...
AI summary The text outlines incentive programs for energy efficiency measures, including lighting, lighting controls, variable speed drives, and natural gas heating and water heating equipment. These incentives are available through online or mail-in rebate submissions and are categorized as prescriptive or quasi-prescriptive based on specific criteria.
heating incentives are prescriptive/quasi-prescriptive based on size Large Retrofit (MBH) or AFUE rating http://www.mass Commercial Program Food service incentives cover fryers, convection save.com/busin ovens, steam cookers, griddles, c...
AI summary The heating incentives program includes prescriptive and quasi-prescriptive incentives for large commercial retrofits, with specific coverage for food service equipment and custom incentives based on project economics. Engineering studies are also supported with partial cost reimbursement.
Incentives are provided for the installation of qualifying energy management systems and vending miser controls For customers with a demand under 300 kW, offer http://www.mass a free audit for identifying energy savings save.com/en/bu...
AI summary The document outlines incentives for energy efficiency measures in commercial and small business settings, including free audits, financial support for retrofits, and financing options for energy management systems and equipment.
ustom measures r Renovation and siness/incentive- Commercial and sustainable office design. Incentives are Replacing Failed programs/new- provided on a prescriptive, quasi-prescriptive or Equipment construction- performance basis. Program...
AI summary The text outlines a commercial incentive program for replacing failed equipment and implementing sustainable office design, offering up to 75% of the incremental cost for installed equipment and $1.00/sqft for energy-efficient lighting and control systems in leased spaces.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 206 of 206 Outputs Total Gross Energy Savings; Total Gross Demand Reduction; Total Net Energy Savings; Total Net Demand Reduction; TR...
AI summary The text outlines key outputs and inputs for reviewing incentive protocols in energy efficiency programs. Outputs include energy savings, demand reduction, TRC and PAC metrics, and cost calculations. Inputs involve cost thresholds, program delivery channels, and financial considerations for setting review guidelines.
Technical Reference Manual (eTRM). Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 10 of 94 2. Experience with the Incentive Setting Workbook This section describes the experience of program staff in completing the Workbook, ba...
AI summary The document discusses the time and challenges involved in completing the Incentive Setting Workbook, noting that it can take up to three to four days per measure due to the complexity and need for multiple reviews. The 'Existing Measures' and 'Inputs & Calcs' tabs were particularly time-consuming.
often reported the “Existing Measures” and “Inputs & Calcs” tabs were the most time consuming because they had to search for information their program components did not track. All five staff members reported the current incentive setting...
AI summary Staff members found the 'Existing Measures' and 'Inputs & Calcs' tabs in the Workbook time-consuming due to the need to search for untracked information. The current incentive setting process is more time-intensive than previous methods, increasing workload burdens and concerns about scaling up.
ting process. We also found adding more detailed and explicit instructions on how to use the tools would improve the Manual. Table 2. Incentive Setting Manual Requirements
AI summary The text discusses the need for more detailed and explicit instructions on how to use tools in the Incentive Setting Manual, suggesting that this would improve the Manual.
process compliance Reviewer is responsible for oversight of the Incentive Review Process, it does not describe what oversight entails. Roles and responsibilities with The Manual specifies that the Incentive Process Reviewer is respect to t...
AI summary The document outlines the responsibility of the Incentive Process Reviewer in overseeing the Incentive Review Process and updating the incentive manual. It confirms that Energy Nova Scotia (ENS) is conducting customer and technology research as specified in the Implementation Plan, both through the incentive setting process and formal research.
market characteristics, customer insights, and supply chain and stakeholder insights. The Workbooks the evaluation team reviewed demonstrate that this research has occurred. 4.2.2. Formal Research ENS’s Two-Year Incentive Setting Research...
AI summary ENS has committed to conducting formal research on incentive setting, focusing on price sensitivity analysis for various energy efficiency measures. The research plan includes residential and commercial LED lighting, heat pumps, and insulation, with a budget of $150,000 annually. The research is on track to be completed by late 2017 or early 2018. ENS has also been tasked with completing an electronic Technical Reference Manual.
ide Management Report – Attachment 2. eTRM Overview. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 19 of 94 ENS completed these recommended financial simulations on June 30, 2017. The purpose of the simulations was to review...
AI summary ENS conducted financial simulations in 2017 to evaluate the appropriateness of existing incentives. The simulations were more effective for prescriptive measures, but less so for quasi-prescriptive and complex programs, such as whole home initiatives, where average incentives and savings were used instead of detailed data.
oduct pricing and other factors are changing over time. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 21 of 94 Recommendation 1-3: Providing market specialists to work with program staff to take on specific aspects of researc...
AI summary The text outlines recommendations for improving market research and program efficiency, including the use of market specialists, creating a repository of common information, and enhancing the Incentive Setting Manual with clearer instructions and role definitions.
Table A-1. Technical Issues with Incentive Setting Tool Across Tabs Permissions: Many (4 of 5) users noted that the current permissions on the tool make it impossible to enter data in certain sections, add notes, or wrap text so that cel...
AI summary The document highlights technical issues with the Incentive Setting Tool, including permission restrictions, inefficiencies in data entry, redundancies, and structural issues in the Existing Measures Tab. Users suggested improvements such as auto-populating information, separating market characteristics by program, and merging cells for better usability.
ta, and therefore does not work if the program is residential. Rounding: The same user also reported that the incentive field rounds up, and because some incentives values are not whole numbers, the cell needs 2 decimal places. Date File...
AI summary The text discusses an interview guide used by ENS staff to gather feedback on an incentive-setting tool, focusing on user experiences, challenges faced, and opportunities for improvement. The guide emphasizes the importance of user input to refine the process for future use.
ce respondents represented close to half of the Retrofit service projects, and more than half of the service’s savings and incentives paid from January through September, 2017 (Table 3). Table 3: Comparison of Retrofit Service Population (...
AI summary The text discusses the Retrofit service projects and BER program participation, noting that respondents represented nearly half of the projects and over half of the savings and incentives paid from January to September 2017. Only three out of 12 BER participants completed interviews.
ly for the BD evaluation. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 35 of 94 3. Findings This chapter is based upon the results of our interviews with BDMs, other key ENS staff, consultants, and participants in BNI progra...
AI summary The chapter evaluates the effectiveness of internal collaboration at ENS, particularly between BDMs and program staff. BDMs are instrumental in identifying appropriate energy-efficiency programs and connecting customers with ENS staff, facilitating the approval and implementation of energy-saving projects.
an interest in future projects stated that they had a small facility and their recent completed Retrofit service project addressed their one major energy using piece of equipment. As further evidence that ENS is responding to the market, C...
AI summary The document discusses ENS's efforts to expand its Custom program component by targeting specific market niches and developing specialists in areas like refrigeration and industrial applications. It also highlights the need for better participation pathways for businesses that are too large for SBES but too small for Custom programs due to the cost of feasibility studies.
Q10. [If they work with BDMs] Do you ever work with BDMs and consultant to discuss technical aspects of a project you are interested in? How does that typically occur? Q11. [If they work with BDMs] Overall, how satisfied are you with your...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions about interactions with BDMs, ENS, and service providers in the context of energy-saving projects and BER incentives. It seeks feedback on satisfaction, communication, and support received, as well as suggestions for improvement.
paperwork? Did the service provider interact directly with ENS staff? Q19. Overall, how satisfied were you with the following aspects of your service provider? 1) The service you received throughout the process 2) [IF APPLICABLE] The infor...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer satisfaction with service providers, additional energy-saving projects, and the BER program. It also asks about future plans and challenges with the BER program, as well as suggestions for improving its effectiveness.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-21: 2 3 Reference: Appe...
AI summary The document contains a series of detailed requests for information related to the costs and breakdowns of energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the 'Appliance Retirement' and 'Instant Savings' components of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program for the years 2020-2022, as well as geographical and product-type breakdowns.
. Costs include both direct incentives (cheques to participants) and the cost to remove and replace appliances 3 4 g) Yes, enhancements have been included in the Alternate Scenario. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-21 Page 3 of...
AI summary The document discusses the costs associated with EfficiencyOne's program, including direct incentives and appliance replacement. It references an application by E1 for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for efficiency and conservation activities from 2020 to 2022, under matter number M09096.
fits exceeding total costs by a ratio of almost five to one. By 2030, the present value of benefits and costs from the Amendment is estimated to be $5.75 billion and $1.20 billion, respectively. For all product categories affected by the A...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to generate significant energy savings and reduce GHG emissions, with benefits far exceeding costs. The analysis shows that energy savings over the product lifecycle will offset any increased retail prices, with payback periods of less than eight years for all product categories. The document provides a detailed cost-benefit analysis.
roduct category, the potential cost of modifying the benchmark product model so that it meets the more stringent MEPS was estimated (e.g. cost of adding extra insulation to a water heater; cost of http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/201810...
AI summary The text discusses the estimated costs of modifying products to meet more stringent MEPS, including manufacturing, compliance, and administrative costs. It also mentions additional costs related to installation, maintenance, and product lifetime, as well as government implementation costs.
ication — costs and alternative scheme for battery chargers A number of stakeholders including three industry associations inquired or raised concerns over verification and its associated costs. Canada’s compliance approach differs from th...
AI summary Stakeholders raised concerns about verification costs for battery chargers. Natural Resources Canada requires certification by accredited bodies for compliance, ensuring fairness and credibility. An alternative verification scheme was introduced to make the process more efficient for low-cost, high-volume products like battery chargers.
Indicators performance GHG emissions are reduced to contribute to Canada’s goal to reduce GHG Percentage of product models Energy efficiency reports emissions by at least 30% below 2005 levels by 2030 that meet MEPS Import reports Consumer...
AI summary The text outlines performance indicators related to GHG emissions reduction, energy efficiency, and cost savings from using efficient products. It emphasizes monitoring through compliance reporting, third-party verification, and market data collection to assess outcomes.
2030. The quantified costs include incremental technology costs to meet the more stringent standards, administrative costs and costs to Government associated with regulatory implementation. While not quantified as part of this analysis, en...
AI summary The text discusses the quantified costs of implementing more stringent energy efficiency standards, including technology, administrative, and regulatory costs. It also highlights economic and non-energy benefits, such as increased productivity and household comfort. The amendment is classified as an 'IN' under the 'One-for-One' Rule and impacts small Canadian manufacturers. The amendment resulted from domestic and international cooperation to meet GHG and energy consumption goals.
estimate social cost of carbon values at $37.4/tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2013 (in 2012$), increasing each year with the expected growth in damages. Methodology to estimate costs The additional or “incremental” costs associated...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology for estimating the incremental costs of an Amendment, focusing on the difference between inefficient and more energy-efficient product models. It outlines how costs are calculated based on modifications to meet MEPS, multiplied by the number of shipments of inefficient models, and includes manufacturing, compliance, and administrative costs, excluding testing and verification costs.
arking is not included either because they are confidential business costs that vary based on business relationships. 16 However, they are estimated to be less than 10% of the total testing costs. http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/201...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology used to estimate energy savings from implementing more stringent MEPS. Energy savings for each product category were calculated by comparing the energy usage of benchmark models with modified versions that meet the new standards. The results were monetized by multiplying energy savings by the cost of energy per unit.
$0.00 $29.63 $29.63 Commercial gasfired water heaters $29.42 $47.23 $17.81 Commercial gasfired storage water heater $15.01 $42.01 $27.00 Residentialduty commercial gasfired storage water heater $5.53 $1.53 $4.00 Commercial gasfired i...
AI summary The table presents costs for various water heaters and furnaces, along with benefits from energy savings and GHG emission reductions. It notes that numbers may not add up due to rounding and covers shipments impacted by proposed regulations between 2019 and 2030. All figures are discounted to the year 2018.
would allow for a more precise stakeholder estimate and decided, for the purpose of this calculation, to apply estimates of incremental burden to all 710 stakeholders. Submitting import reports The Amendment would introduce import reportin...
AI summary The text discusses the administrative burden on importers due to new import reporting requirements for energy-using products, estimating the number of importers affected and the time and cost associated with completing these reports.
Indicators Measure Performance GHG emissions are reduced to contribute to Canada’s goal to reduce GHG Energy efficiency emissions by at least 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. reports Import reports Market data Consumers save money by purchas...
AI summary The text outlines performance indicators related to reducing GHG emissions and promoting energy efficiency. It highlights consumer savings from purchasing efficient products, business benefits from using regulated equipment, and the importance of energy efficiency reports, market data, lab testing, and emission factors in measuring progress.
U.S. Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Carbon (IWGSCC), 2010. Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866. 18 Vary by manufacturer and are based on a number of...
AI summary The text references technical documents and studies related to energy efficiency, including the Social Cost of Carbon, appliance standards, and the impact of regulations on emissions. It also mentions cost calculations for technologies and installation, as well as benefits from energy savings and GHG reductions.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 • Some lighting measures in the Instant Savings program component (e.g., R, BR and 2 Decorative LEDs) are anticipated to be phased out over time. Machine-generated 3 solutions maintained relatively constant uptake of the...
AI summary The text discusses adjustments to various energy efficiency programs, including the phase-out of certain lighting measures, changes in heat pump incentives, and adjustments to anticipated participation levels. It also mentions corrections to assumptions for new programs such as the First Nations Home Energy Efficiency program.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 TRC – Refers to the Total Resource Cost [Test]. 2 3 VFD – Refers to a Variable Frequency Drive. 4 5 Please note that standard SI unit abbreviations have not been defined here. 6 7 d) These values were calculated within N...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy and demand savings using Navigant’s ProCESS model, administrative cost allocation methods, and the basis for incremental cost information and incentives for various energy efficiency measures. It also notes that some cost estimates are preliminary and will be refined with operational data.
Incentives were informed by actual incentive levels offered by Efficiency PEI, as provided 29 in Attachment 8. Incentive levels for Business Energy Rebates ETS systems were linearly Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-41 Page 6 of...
AI summary The text outlines how incentive levels for energy efficiency programs were determined, referencing Efficiency PEI and extrapolating data for Business Energy Rebates and Small Business Energy Solutions. It also mentions the use of Navigant’s ProCESS model for calculating other information in the appendix.
inition Based on a critical review of previous definitions2 by GDS and discussion with the SPWG, the following measure life definition was agreed on for use in this report: For programs delivered by program administrators in New England, M...
AI summary The document outlines the agreed-upon definition of Measure Life for energy efficiency programs, distinguishing between equipment life and measure persistence, and presents recommended measure life values for residential and commercial/industrial lighting and HVAC measures.
• Development of Proposed Draft and Final Default Measure Life Values More information regarding the approach for conducting each of these activities is presented below. A. Data Collection GDS identified and assembled reference measure lif...
AI summary The document outlines the process for developing proposed draft and final default measure life values for energy efficiency programs. It includes data collection from various sources such as studies and technical reference manuals, and the subsequent review and analysis of this data to propose measure life values.
Home Energy Savings" 8th ed., 2003, ACEEE VT TPS [28] phone call with Honeywell by Dick Spellman in 2001 DEER [29] engineering judgement [30] “Evaluation of Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s 1997 Commercial Energy Efficiency Incentives Prog...
AI summary The text lists various sources and references used in evaluating energy efficiency programs, including studies by Quantum Consulting, Inc., and technical reports from organizations such as DEER, CALMAC, and SERA Inc., along with data from the Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute and VEIC experience.
EL(=9 [36]; 11 [17]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced Pump Repair Sku 9;11 - included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=12; each project's expected life is 4 yrs but VFD's will be used for mult...
AI summary The text discusses various energy efficiency and management programs, including persistence and retention studies, variable time periods systems, and specific projects like VFD for environmental remediation and heat pump VSD. It references multiple studies and footnotes related to project lifespans and efficiency factors.
“The future is already present with ECOMBI System” 4 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 5 of 16 EFFICIENCY IS ALL DOWN TO CONTROL The cornerstone of ECOMBI technological innovation patented by ELNUR is the dynamic...
AI summary The ECOMBI system uses advanced thermostat technology and dynamic energy management to optimize heating efficiency and reduce energy consumption. It adjusts energy charging based on temperature readings and customer comfort needs, and utilizes off-peak electricity tariffs for cost-effective heating.
ined by our ESSIC technology. ESICC (ECOMBI Smart Input Charge Control) electronic management module assesses the energy consumption and adjusts energy charging to cover the user’s comfort needs. ECOMBI is programmed to store only the requ...
AI summary The ECOMBI system uses smart input charge control to manage energy consumption for heating, ensuring that only the required energy is used to maintain set temperatures. It adjusts energy charging during off-peak periods and can reduce energy consumption by 35%. The system allows for programming of comfort and eco temperatures on a daily and weekly basis.
11016 11016 Storage heater elements and predictive emitter element will never operate at the same time. 14 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 15 of 16 ECOMBI, SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY The ECOMBI System does not re...
AI summary The ECOMBI System is described as a safe, maintenance-free electric heating solution with no moving parts, requiring no fuel tanks or hydraulic circuits. It is environmentally friendly, does not emit CO2 or produce fumes, and can be powered by renewable energy sources. The system is highlighted as promoting a healthy environment and being suitable for both new and old buildings.
Energy Rebates $4,917.98 68 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 7 Page 2 of 6
AI summary The document contains a line item for Energy Rebates with a value of $4,917.98 and a count of 68, filed on March 29, 2019, as part of NS Power IR-41 Attachment 7.
Table 3: SBES Unitary Admin Cost Measure Admin Cost Unit Count 1/2 Size Hot Food Holding Cabinet Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Advanced Lighting Design (Performance Lighting) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Air Source Hea...
AI summary The table outlines administrative costs for various energy efficiency measures under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, with some measures having zero administrative costs and others having significant costs associated with them.
umen) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Pole/Arm-Mounted Area Luminaire (20000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $121,780.87 1945 Pole/Arm-Mounted Area Luminaire (4000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $10,438.36 834 Pole/A...
AI summary The text lists various lighting and equipment installations under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including costs and quantities for different luminaire types. It appears to be a financial breakdown or summary of expenditures related to energy efficiency initiatives for small businesses.
Measure Admin Cost Unit Count Refrigerated Vending Machine Controls Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Remote Condensing Unit Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Self-Contained Ice Maker Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Ser...
AI summary The text presents a list of energy efficiency measures under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including details on administrative costs and unit counts for various equipment. Most entries show zero administrative costs and unit counts, with a few exceptions such as Solid Door Refrigerator and Standard Capacity Electric Fryer.
l Mounted Area Luminaire (1000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $9,820.41 311 Wall Mounted Area Luminaire (10000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $56,367.15 1667 Wall Mounted Area Luminaire (50000 lumen) Small Business Energy S...
AI summary The text provides administrative cost data for energy efficiency programs, including specific measures and their associated costs and unit counts for Small Business Energy Solutions and Home Energy Assessments. The data includes various lighting and heating measures, with some measures having zero costs and unit counts.
ergy Assessment $536,239.13 1,745 Whole Home Home Energy Assessment $3,483,047.39 2,804 Average Per Unit Admin $848.68 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 8 Page 1 of 3 Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates: Registration effi...
AI summary The text describes the Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates program offered by efficiencyPEI, which provides incentives for energy efficiency upgrades in existing homes. Applicants must meet eligibility criteria, complete upgrades by the application date, and provide receipts for work done. The program targets homeowners, with rebates issued directly to them or to contractors.
City/town: Postal code: Phone: PID: The dwelling owner has the right to allow or deny a particular individual or contractor access to their residence for the purpose of performing these upgrades. Neither efficiencyPEI nor the Government of...
AI summary The text outlines the rights of dwelling owners regarding access to their property for energy efficiency upgrades and the certification process for eligibility in the Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates program. It also includes a privacy notice under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Regular rebate: Energy Efficient Equipment$25.00/SQ/R-value Above Grade Walls (with new interior/exterior finish): Rebate Rebate Amounts: Amount: increase Minimum requirements: Minimum R-value increase of R6 Low-income rebates: Rebate Reba...
AI summary The text outlines rebate amounts for energy-efficient equipment, specifically for above-grade walls and heat pumps, with different rates for regular and low-income programs. Rebates are based on R-value increases and include specific minimum requirements for eligibility.
Ground SourceFloors/Headers: Exposed (Geothermal) Heat Pump $4,000.00 $7,500.00 ENERGY STAR Most Rebate Efficient 2018 Amount: Minimum requirements: Regular Oil Boilerrebate: $500.00 $900.00 $12.00/SQ/R-value ENERGY increase STAR w/AFUE of...
AI summary The text outlines various rebate amounts and requirements for different heating systems, including geothermal heat pumps, oil boilers, and propane boilers, with specific emphasis on ENERGY STAR efficiency standards and R-value requirements for insulation upgrades.
r requirements: Regular rebate: $12.00/SQ/R-value increase Minimum R-value increase of R12 Propane Furnace Low-income rebates: $500.00 $900.00 ENERGY STAR Most Efficientincrease $20.00/SQ/R-value 2018 w/AFUE of 97.0% or higherR-value incre...
AI summary The text outlines rebate requirements for energy efficiency programs, including specific amounts for different types of heating systems and insulation upgrades, with some rebates tied to specific programs in Summerside.
Program SolarSealing: Air Thermal Hot Water Heater $1,500.00 $2,750.00 ENERGY STARRegular or CAN/CSA F379 or CSA Class 2831-06, 2831-07, 2831-30, 2831-37 Rebate: Low or Class 8854 Income Reb 10% improvement Tankless over Heater Propane Hot...
AI summary The text provides rebate details for various hot water heater and ventilation programs, including eligibility criteria and rebate amounts based on efficiency improvements and compliance with specific standards.
r $500.00 $900.00 Terms and conditions: Heat/Energy Recovery Ventilator I/We ackowledge and agree that: $1,000.00 $1,800.00 ENERGY STAR Boimass 1. Stove and dwelling that is the subject of this The property $1,000.00 $1,800.00 application...
AI summary The text outlines rebate eligibility criteria for energy efficiency programs, including requirements for heat recovery ventilators, biomass stoves, and geothermal heat pumps. Specific conditions such as property registration, occupancy duration, and compliance with standards are mentioned.
er the efficiencyPEI Energy Efficient Equipment program is registered with the Taxation and Property 7. I am/We are required to inform the contractor who is completing energy upgrades on my/our dwelling that the contractor must declare to...
AI summary The document outlines requirements and conditions for participation in the efficiencyPEI Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates program, including eligibility criteria, contractor obligations, information disclosure, and rebate limits.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 prepared by H. Gil Peach & Associa...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) regarding the reliance on evaluated and verified LES results for reporting purposes. E1 states that Econoler's evaluations are within accepted industry frameworks and that uncertainty in EUL values is addressed through qualitative technical assessments.
program costs in year t PCNt = Net participant costs in year t UICt = Utility increased supply costs in year t Specifically, at least six key components of the TRC calculation may be subject to entirely different methodological approaches...
AI summary The document discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) calculation, emphasizing how different regions approach the inclusion of costs and benefits associated with free riders in DSM measures. It highlights varying methodologies used in regions like Ontario, California, and Quebec.
analysis they can account for, and the benefits of measures with longer lifespans (e.g. new construction, envelope retrofits, ground source heat pumps) may literally be cut short as a result. WWW.DUNSKY.CA 12 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS...
AI summary The text discusses concerns about the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test's potential bias in neglecting non-energy benefits (NEBs) from demand-side management (DSM) measures. It highlights that while TRC accounts for costs, it may not fully capture benefits to participants, utilities, and society, especially from long-term measures like ground source heat pumps.
18 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 23 of 46 generate, for every million dollars in DSM program spending, a net increase in provincial GDP of between $2.7 and $4.1M, and from 22 to 33 job-years of net employment....
AI summary The text discusses the economic benefits of DSM programs, noting that they generate GDP and employment. It also addresses the use of discount rates in TRC calculations, questioning whether utility WACC is appropriate or if a societal discount rate should be used instead, as seen in regions like New York and New England.
the corresponding guidelines recently developed by the National Efficiency Screening Project and adopted by the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships’ EM&V Forum – for Nova Scotia. Fig. 7. Overview of Concerns & Implications for Nova Sc...
AI summary The text discusses concerns related to the accuracy and bias in the Total Resource Cost (TRC) methodology, emphasizing the need for transparency and the inclusion of non-energy benefits. It references guidelines from the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) and the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships’ EM&V Forum, suggesting a shift to the Potential Annual Cost (PAC) test for better symmetry and vetting.
Qualitative Resource Value Framework – Nova Scotia Legacy TRC Program Name: Electric DSM Date: December 2014 1. Key Assumptions, Parameters and Summary of Results Program Analysis Level □ Portfolio Measure Life n/a Discount Rate WACC 2. Mo...
AI summary This document outlines the Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Summary of Results for the Electric DSM Program under the Qualitative Resource Value Framework – Nova Scotia Legacy TRC. It details monetized program administrator costs and benefits, including avoided energy and capacity costs, as well as participant costs and benefits such as fuel savings and non-energy benefits.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 b) No, it is not possible to unambiguously confirm that the electric efficiency expenditure data 3 used in the ACEEE Appendix B (available at: https://aceee.org/research-report/u1808) 4 are reported in a similar manner...
AI summary The document discusses the limitations in comparing electric efficiency expenditure data from the ACEEE Appendix B with budget data from Mr. Reed's direct evidence. It highlights that the ACEEE data may include additional state expenditures beyond PA activities and notes that per capita spending is not a commonly used metric, with ACEEE preferring revenue-based normalization.
lities that have a few very large customers. An 26 alternative metric, statewide electric energy efficiency spending per 27 capita, is presented in ACEEE Appendix B. ” Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-58 Page 3 of 3 EfficiencyOn...
AI summary The document discusses an alternative metric for evaluating electric energy efficiency spending per capita, referencing ACEEE Appendix B. It also mentions EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020-2022) under matter M09096.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 ii) That EfficiencyOne offers in-store rebates on those high-efficiency versions 2 through electrical distributors; 3 iii) That these facilities are of a sufficient size so that within each facility, some of 4 this equip...
AI summary EfficiencyOne provides in-store rebates for high-efficiency equipment through electrical distributors. The text outlines conditions for participation in the BER-IR program, including facility size, maintenance practices, and the role of maintenance staff. The Municipal class is also addressed, with MEUs treated as participants if their customers participate. No sensitivity analysis was conducted.
E-52018 DSM Evaluation Reports
147 passages
2.3 On-site Visits For the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator visited a total of 211 participant sites in the summer and fall of 2018. For all BNI program components, the objective of the on-site visits was to collect data to establish or vali...
AI summary In 2018, an evaluator conducted on-site visits to 211 participant sites to collect data for validating parameters in savings calculations for BNI program components. These visits were used to review project files, assess the completeness of simulation files, validate equipment functionality, and ensure proper metering processes at recycling facilities.
Instant Savings In 2018, 669,550 products were sold through Instant Savings which represents fewer sales than in 2017. Although the overall savings achieved by Instant Savings in 2018 were higher than in 2017, due to higher average savings...
AI summary In 2018, Instant Savings sold 669,550 products, with LED A-type lamps being the most popular. Despite fewer sales than in 2017, overall savings increased due to higher average savings per product. Net electrical energy savings were 21.930 GWh and net peak demand savings were 2.572 MW. Evaluated savings were higher than tracked savings due to adjustments in unitary savings and increased spillover levels.
Table 13: Evaluated Net Energy Savings at the Generator, 2014-2018 DCM Drawers DOM Drowner Company Eı nergy (GW h) Energy (% of Total Portfolio) DSM Program DSM Program Component 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Residentia...
AI summary Table 13 presents evaluated net energy savings at the generator from 2014 to 2018, detailing energy savings and percentages of the total portfolio for various DSM programs, including appliance retirement, product rebates, home energy assessments, and business energy rebates. The data highlights the contribution of residential and BNI programs to overall energy savings.
Table 14: Evaluated Net Peak Demand Savings at the Generator, 2014-2018 DOM Due succes DCM Program Commonant Peak Demand (MW) Peak Demand (% of Total Portfolio) DSM Program DSM Program Component 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017...
AI summary Table 14 presents evaluated net peak demand savings at the generator from 2014 to 2018, showing data for residential, BNI, and portfolio totals. The table breaks down savings by program and year, highlighting the impact of various energy efficiency initiatives on peak demand.
Table 15: Crosscutting Recommendation on ENS Programs No. Recommendation CR-R1. Monitor the market evolution for lighting products that were recently removed from ENS offerings. The recent changes to lighting product eligibility in Instant...
AI summary The recommendation suggests monitoring the market evolution for lighting products recently removed from ENS offerings. Changes to lighting product eligibility in Instant Savings and Business Energy Rebates may significantly impact savings. The Evaluator advises ENS to collect timely data on market evolution to enable quick adjustments if necessary.
Table 17: Recommendations on Business, Non-profit and Institutional Program Components No. Recommendation BER-R1. Review BER logic model and eligibility criteria to ensure that the intended projects and participants go through each service...
AI summary The text recommends reviewing the Business Energy Rebate (BER) logic model and eligibility criteria to clarify the purpose and differences between BER and other services, ensuring alignment with objectives and improving performance and savings assessment accuracy.
APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Components Bibliographic References ECOX. Technical Information Bulletin No. E-004-EN: SEER, www.ecoxline.com (Last accessed March 3, 2016). EMERA INC., Management's Discussion & Analysis as at February 9, 2...
AI summary This appendix provides a bibliography of references related to energy efficiency programs, appliance standards, and emissions data, including sources such as Natural Resources Canada, Nova Scotia Power, and various studies conducted by organizations like Econoler and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Margin of Error of the Surveys The 2017 EPI non-low-income survey margin of error was established by using the following formula, which corresponds to the margin of error calculation for a proportion (i.e. a value between 0 percent and 100...
AI summary The document explains the formula used to calculate the margin of error for the 2017 EPI non-low-income survey, which is based on the proportion calculation method.
Executive Summary – Appendix Report Efficient Product R ebates - LED Bulbs, Owners Free-ridership algorithm Low Free-ridership Participant High Free-ridership Participant Average Free-ridership Participant Questions Calculation Algorithm A...
AI summary The document presents a table analyzing free-ridership in an efficient product rebate program for LED bulbs and low flow showerheads. It includes questions and calculations to determine the likelihood of participants having purchased these items independently of the program.
Custom Retrofit Custom Retrofit, you had a I just want to make sure - Before you decided to participate in already made the decision to implement the energy efficiency ed through Custom Retrofit? IF 1. Yes: FR1c=100% IF 2. No OR DK OR REF:...
AI summary The text presents a table related to a Custom Retrofit program, focusing on participant responses regarding their decision-making process, the influence of program rebates, technical assistance, and confidence in the project. It includes scoring metrics and factors influencing participation, such as the likelihood of postponing implementation without financial incentives.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) evaluation of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program comprised of two components: (1) Appliance Retirement (ARet); and (2) Instant Savin...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) program, specifically the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, which includes Appliance Retirement and Instant Savings. It provides participant numbers and savings data for each component and the overall program.
Instant Savings Instant Savings is carried out with the help of one delivery agent (DA) and participating retailers to offer rebates to consumers on the purchase of various energy efficient products that include ENERGY STAR® certified ligh...
AI summary Instant Savings is a program that provides rebates for energy-efficient products through a delivery agent and participating retailers. The program expanded in 2018 to include additional products like air purifiers and dehumidifiers. Evaluations were conducted through documentation reviews, retailer interviews, participant surveys, and savings reviews.
4.14 NTGR Calculation Given the methodology used to obtain net savings, the NTGR could not be calculated as a sum of the percentages of all the effects values. As required by the UMP calculation methodology, the savings associated with eac...
AI summary The document explains the methodology for calculating the equivalent NTGR (Net Total Gross Savings) by using a weighted average of savings from scenarios with and without appliance retirement. It also presents a table with appliance-specific data and notes that HomeWarming replacements assume a NTGR of 1 due to their direct replacement nature.
6.1 Description Instant Savings offers instant cash rebates to consumers who purchase eligible energy efficient products. Instant Savings is carried out with the help of one DA, as well as nine national retailers and 33 independent retaile...
AI summary Instant Savings provides cash rebates for energy-efficient products in Nova Scotia. The program works with a Demand Advisor and multiple retailers. In 2018, rebates were offered during two campaigns, and new products like smart thermostats and air purifiers were added. Rebate amounts for certain products were increased during the fall 2018 campaign.
Table 27: List of Rebates by Product Products Offered during Campaigns Spring Rebate Fall Rebate ENERGY STAR Certified LED A-type Lamps (1-2 packs/packs of 3 or more) $2/$5 $2/$5 ENERGY STAR Certified LED Non-A-type Lamps (1-2 packs/packs...
AI summary The document presents Table 27, which lists various rebates offered for energy-efficient products during Spring and Fall campaigns, as well as year-round rebates. It also mentions the promotion of the Instant Savings program through multiple channels in 2018.
Product Selection, Preparation Process, and Rebate Amounts Retailers were generally satisfied with the selection of products included in Instant Savings, with an average satisfaction rating of 7.8 on a 10-point scale. Among the nine retail...
AI summary Retailers generally expressed satisfaction with the Instant Savings program's product selection, preparation process, and rebate amounts, though some suggested improvements such as diversifying eligible products and increasing rebates on lighting fixtures. The average satisfaction ratings were 7.8, 7.9, and 8.0 respectively.
9.1.1 Unitary Savings Values The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used in the tracking sheet for each product category rebated through Instant Savings. Using a combination of program data, engineering algorithms, and values fr...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised unitary savings values for various product categories under the Instant Savings program. Adjustments were made based on product popularity, replacement scenarios, and installation feasibility, with changes documented for LED lamps, smart thermostats, load sensing power bars, clotheslines, and large appliances.
OPTION C [ASK IF DIFFICULTY TO ANSWER OPTION B AND IF REBATE ELIGIBLE NON A-TYPE TOTAL SALES =YES]
AI summary The text references an option (Option C) and mentions rebate eligibility for non-A-type total sales, indicating a discussion related to customer programs and eligibility criteria for rebates.
Green Heat Green Heat provides financial incentives to homeowners and encourages them to reduce heating electricity consumption by either installing high-efficiency electrical systems or replacing existing electrical heating systems with s...
AI summary Green Heat offers financial incentives for installing high-efficiency heating systems, including heat pumps, biomass, and solar thermal. As of August 2017, it shifted to an after-purchase mail-in rebate model and introduced new eligibility criteria. In 2018, it expanded to non-electrically heated homes with funding from the LCEF. The program evaluation involved documentation reviews, interviews, and on-site visits.
EPI Performance EPI aimed to achieve 17.1 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.0 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that EPI achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463...
AI summary The EPI program achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018. These savings corresponded to 7,827 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided GHG emissions. EPI's net lifetime energy savings were 107.988 GWh, with a weighted average EUL of 8.45 years. Over 10,813 households participated, and ENS distributed free clotheslines and diversified product offerings to boost participation.
EPI Energy Savings To calculate EPI gross energy savings, the Evaluator performed a literature review of the unitary savings values of each category of product tracked and installed through EPI. The Evaluator found that the values used to...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated EPI gross energy savings by reviewing unitary savings values for various products and updating them based on new data. Installation rates for certain products were adjusted, and the NTGR was determined to estimate net energy savings, with different values for low-income and non-low-income participants.
version of HOT2000 and of the rating system have been put in place; with these new versions, a rating in GJ reflects the modelled consumption of a home and 0 GJ is the best rating a home can achieve. Homeowners have 12 months to complete t...
AI summary The document outlines the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, which provides rebates and low-interest financing for energy efficiency upgrades. It details the process for homeowners to complete upgrades, schedule assessments, and receive final EnerGuide ratings. The program includes eligible measures such as insulation, windows, heat pumps, and ventilation systems, with incentive adjustments made in July 2018.
Table 9: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for HEA 2017 Recommendation Status 2017 HEA-R1. Review the current incentive structure to look for possible ways to simplify it. Implemented 2017 HEA-R2. Conduct a billing analysis to...
AI summary The 2017 HEA recommendations were implemented. ENS simplified the incentive structure by discontinuing bundling and tiered approaches, launching the new structure in July 2018. A billing analysis using HOT2000 estimated the overestimation ratio for simulation models.
5.1 Description The goal of Green Heat is to encourage the installation of energy efficient heating systems that have a renewable component in Nova Scotia homes. More specifically, Green Heat provides financial incentives to homeowners for...
AI summary The Green Heat Program encourages the installation of energy-efficient heating systems with renewable components in Nova Scotia homes. It offers financial incentives for heat pumps, biomass, and solar thermal systems, managed by ENS. Changes in August 2017 include a mail-in rebate structure, updated eligibility criteria, and referrals to HEA and NSP for financing.
Heat Pump Systems Incentive Mini-split Heat Pumps $200/Refrigeration Tonne Air-source Heat Pumps (Centrally-ducted) $400/Refrigeration Tonne Air-to-water Heat Pumps $400/Refrigeration Tonne Ground-source Heat Pumps $500/Refrigeration Tonne...
AI summary The document outlines incentive rates for various heat pump and biomass systems under the Green Heat Program from August 2017 to November 20, 2017. It also discusses the inclusion of participants who completed their process in 2018, leading to the 2018 Evaluation Report.
Fuel-switching Measure For biomass or solar heating systems, the questionnaire assessed the likelihood of participants replacing their electrical system with a non-electrical system in the absence of the program component. Additional quest...
AI summary The free-ridership level for biomass and solar heating systems increased significantly from 36% in 2017 to 58% in 2018, attributed to a new delivery mechanism that allows rebate claims after purchase, reducing reliance on ENS approval. This change impacted the influence of rebates and information provided by ENS on participant decisions.
Table 33: Green Heat Incented High-efficiency ∕ Mini-spli it Heat Pumi p Systems , , 2015 2016 2017 2018 Electrical Non- electrical Electrical Non- electrical Electrical Non- electrical Electrical Non- electrical Number of MSHP Systems 111...
AI summary The table provides data on the number of high-efficiency mini-split heat pump systems installed and incentivized by the Green Heat Program from 2015 to 2018, along with the average HSPF of units during those years.
Table 34: HEA Incented High-efficiency Mini-split Heat Pump Systems 2015 2016 2017 2018 Number of MSHP systems 16 220 516 402 Figure 14 further below presents the number of MSHP systems incented through Green Heat and HEA compared to an es...
AI summary Table 34 shows the number of HEA-incented mini-split heat pump systems installed from 2015 to 2018. In 2017, 25% of total MSHPs installed in existing homes were incented by ENS, with 19% from Green Heat. In 2018, the percentage incented by ENS was estimated at 26%.
2016 2017 2018 Nominal Capacity (BTU/hr) Average Cost Average Incentive Average Cost Average Incentive Average Cost Average Incentive 12,000 and below $4,462 $335 $5,028 $256 $4,693 $216 12,100-24,000 $6,510 $428 $6,335 $351 $6,124 $302 Ab...
AI summary Table 35 presents average costs and incentives for program component units in 2016, 2017, and 2018, showing variations across different nominal capacity ranges.
10.1 Description EPI provides participants with free-of-charge direct installations of energy efficient products. ENS contracts service providers to provide this service across the province. EPI encourages participants to also consider oth...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program provides free direct installation of energy-efficient products to homeowners and renters across Nova Scotia. In 2018, the program expanded to include thermostatic shower valves and free clotheslines. EPI is funded by electricity ratepayer funds and the Government of Nova Scotia, with specific eligibility criteria for different products. The program aimed to achieve significant energy savings in 2018.
10.3 Participation History Since 2012, EPI has contributed significantly to the growth of energy efficient lighting product penetration in the Nova Scotia market by providing direct installation of such products to over 100,000 households....
AI summary Since 2012, the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program has significantly increased energy-efficient lighting product penetration in Nova Scotia. However, participation levels declined in 2018, with a 21% drop in participants and a 27% drop in installed products compared to 2017. The decline is attributed to a smaller pool of potential participants and a shift in product types, with A-type lamps decreasing and non-A-type lamps increasing in usage.
Table 50: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI L E D La m p s Sa in ( ) To ta l Ne t En t t he Ge to G W h er g g s a ne ra r y v – 0. 0 5 7 5. 9 0 8 0. 0 4 6 0. 0 3 9 0. 2 2 2 0. 0 2 4 E f fe ive Us fu...
AI summary Table 50 evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It includes metrics such as net energy savings, effective useful life, net life energy savings, and peak demand savings, along with the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR).
FRH1. Moving along to another topic… Had you already decided to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT] before you heard about the Green Heat program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don't know) 99. (Refused) 1. 2. 98. 99. [EQUIPMENT]? Yes No (Don't know)...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question regarding whether a respondent had already decided to install high efficiency equipment before learning about the Green Heat program, and explores the impact of the program's rebate on their decision-making process.
FRH1a. I just want to make sure I understand – before you decided to participate in the Green Heat program, you had already made the decision to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT]? Already Made Decision to Install Equipment Prior to Gre...
AI summary The text discusses participant responses regarding their decision to install high efficiency equipment prior to joining the Green Heat program and their willingness to pay for the equipment without the rebate. The data shows that 64% had already decided to install a heat pump before the program, and the mean willingness to pay full cost was 8.1 out of 10.
Influence of Factors on Decision to Solar or Biomass 2018 Equipment Installed Sample Size Mean The program component rebate 23 4.4 Information provided by ENS 23 3.7 Don't know/Refused excluded from calculations
AI summary The text discusses a 2018 study examining the influence of factors on the decision to adopt solar or biomass energy. It includes data on equipment installed, sample size, and mean values for program component rebates and information provided by ENS.
PA3 Score: (10 - FRH4) x 10% FRH3c. If Green Heat rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed installing the [EQUIPMENT] by at least one year? (Scale 0 to 10) FRH3c = (10 - Answer) x 10% IF DK OR REF:...
AI summary The text presents a scoring formula related to the Green Heat rebate program, asking respondents to assess the likelihood of postponing equipment installation if the rebate had not been offered, with a calculation based on their response.
Table 17: Unitary Savings Values for Low-flow Showerheads24 Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Baseline Flow Rate [gpm] qbase Variable (2.0 gpm, 2.25 gpm, or 2.5 gpm) Variable (2.0 gpm, 2.25 gpm, or...
AI summary Table 17 outlines unitary savings values for low-flow showerheads in single-family homes and apartments, including parameters such as flow rates, shower usage, and water heater efficiency. These values are calculated based on data from EPI tracking sheets and other studies.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. Net-to-gross ratio The ratio of net energy savings to gross energy savings. Non-sampling error Errors arising during the course of all survey activities other t...
AI summary The document defines key terms related to energy efficiency and measurement accuracy, including net-to-gross ratio, precision, peak demand savings, and tracked savings. These definitions are essential for understanding energy savings calculations and measurement methodologies in regulatory contexts.
Incentives and Home Labels Jurisdictions use a range of incentive amounts and base their incentives on different benchmarks depending on their location, program delivery history, market research, and home label certifications. Offering a r...
AI summary Jurisdictions use varying incentive amounts based on location, program history, and home label certifications to attract different types of builders. Incentives help builders improve efficiency over time, and associating programs with labels like ENERGY STAR helps builders stand out to customers.
Table 4: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component Program Component 2017 2018 Program Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in 2017 and 2018, focusing on process, market, and impact evaluations across various residential and business energy efficiency programs.
ts remained the same. This new version of the rating system and HOT2000 are meant to provide homeowners with more useful information about their new homes' energy performance. New Home Construction 3 4 ENS considers a home to be electrical...
AI summary The document discusses the new version of the energy rating system and HOT2000 software, which provide homeowners with more useful information about their new homes' energy performance. It also outlines incentives for new home construction based on energy efficiency standards, including ENERGY STAR and R2000 certifications.
Table 5: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for NHC 2017 Recommendations Status 2017 NHC-R1. Conduct a process evaluation for NHC in 2018. Implemented 2017 NHC-R2. Conduct a billing analysis to review the overestimation ratio (O...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the implementation status of 2017 recommendations for New Home Construction (NHC). Recommendation NHC-R1 was implemented in 2018 with a process evaluation, while NHC-R2, which involved a billing analysis to review the overestimation ratio, was not implemented. ENS adjusted NHC incentive levels on 3 December 2018.
Table 9: Project Registration Overview Project Registration Processes Efficiency mont Ver Connecticut Energize National Grid Rhode Island Fortis BC wer NB Po ENS Total Fees Builders Pay No fee 2 Fee paid to HERS rater or energy advisor...
AI summary Table 9 outlines project registration processes across various entities, including ENS and others, detailing fees, registration methods, and requirements. Builders in ENS territory pay a portion of the fee, with ENS covering the remainder.
Table 11: Incentive Amounts and Basis for Incentive by Program Range (CAD) Program Low High Efficiency Vermont Energize Connecticut National Grid Rhode Island Fortis BC^ NB Power ENS> Incentive Amounts Offered $500 $1,000 $1,001 $2,000...
AI summary Table 11 outlines incentive amounts and their basis for various energy efficiency programs, including Efficiency Vermont, Energize Connecticut, National Grid Rhode Island, Fortis BC, NB Power, and ENS. It specifies ranges for incentive amounts and the criteria used to determine eligibility, such as HERS scores and code compliance.
+ Additionally, $750 is offered to Zero Net Energy (ZNE) Homes and $500 is offered to ENERGY STAR, LEED for homes, National Green Building Standard (NGBS), and Passive House homes. ^ In addition to builder incentives, $400 is offered to en...
AI summary The text discusses incentive structures for energy-efficient homes, including financial support for ZNE and certified homes, and the evolution of programs to meet code and market changes. It also highlights the provision of home labels and certifications by various programs.
Lessons Learned by Respondents Offering several incentive tiers provides options for many different types of builders . All respondents noted offering multiple incentive tiers designed to provide differing efficiency levels so builders can...
AI summary Respondents emphasized the importance of offering multiple incentive tiers to encourage builders to adopt energy efficiency gradually, and highlighted the value of home labels and certifications in helping builders differentiate themselves from competitors. Examples include ENERGY STAR and EnerGuide labels.
Overestimation Ratio The OR is used to adjust the modelled energy consumption values generated by the HOT2000 software because it tends to slightly overestimate savings. The ORs established as part of the HEA evaluation were used to adjust...
AI summary The Overestimation Ratio (OR) is used to adjust energy consumption values from the HOT2000 software, which overestimates savings. ORs were established for the 2018 HEA evaluation, distinguishing between homes with and without heat pumps. Additional analyses were conducted for the to-code model, which uses electrical baseboards. The OR used for tracked savings calculation was 16 percent across all scenarios.
Method 2: Savings per EnerGuide Point For 2018, the savings per EnerGuide point method was used for one participant who registered before 2015 and who did not have a to-code energy consumption value. The method was also used for one partic...
AI summary The document discusses the use of the 'Savings per EnerGuide Point' method in 2018 for energy efficiency evaluations. It explains that the method was applied to two specific cases due to inconsistencies in energy consumption data. The average baseline EnerGuide rating of 78 is based on the 2012 National Building Code and used in HOT2000 Version 10. The savings per EnerGuide point value of 1,278 kWh was calculated using data from 2015 NHC participants and adjusted by an overestimation ratio of 16%.
OT2000 version 11 rating system in upcoming years, the Evaluator recommends conducting a billing analysis specific to NHC participants when a large enough sample becomes available to both consider the various versions of HOT2000 (i.e. vers...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends conducting a billing analysis for NHC participants to evaluate the impact of different HOT2000 versions and heating systems. Issues with manual data entry and inconsistent formulas in the 2018 tracking sheet were identified, and revised formulas were shared with ENS for future use.
[ASK ALL] Q19. How long does it take the builder or incentive to receive their incentive once they have completed all required program steps? Q20. What feedback, if any, have you heard from builders or homeowners about the time it takes to...
AI summary The questions ask about the time it takes for builders and incentives to receive payments after completing program steps and seek feedback from builders and homeowners regarding the time taken to receive incentives.
[ASK ALL] Q25. ENS requires homes that are registered with the program be completed within 1 year of registration in order to receive incentives. Do you have a similar requirement, and if so, what is the requirement? What feedback, if any,...
AI summary The question asks whether similar requirements exist for program registration deadlines, specifically regarding the completion of homes within a year of registration to receive incentives. It also inquires about feedback from builders and homeowners, and any changes to the deadline since the program's implementation.
[ASK ALL] Q26. Who receives program incentives - builders, homeowners, or both? Why did you choose to give incentives to builders and/or homeowners? Q27. How did you choose the incentive amounts you offer? [ASK ALL] Q28. How have incentive...
AI summary The questions focus on who receives program incentives, the rationale behind incentive amounts, changes over time, and feedback from builders regarding the sufficiency of incentives to maintain participation in the program.
[ASK IF NOT ADDRESSED] Q30. How, if at all, do the perceptions about incentives differ between spec and custom builders? [ If differences :] What are those differences?
AI summary The question explores differences in perceptions about incentives between spec and custom builders. It asks whether such differences exist and, if so, what they are.
Interest and Participation in Non-lighting Measures ENS developed a long-term diversification strategy to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures. The Evaluator assessed participants' interest in and intentions to implement n...
AI summary ENS developed a strategy to promote non-lighting energy efficiency measures. Survey results show that about half of participants plan to implement such measures, with HVAC being the most common category. Contractors suggest adding specific measures and increasing incentives for heating and refrigeration. Many participants use payback thresholds, with most requiring payback periods of five years or less, which may be a barrier for some non-lighting measures.
BER Recommendations The 2018 impact evaluation revealed that the accuracy of reported savings had improved, especially for Mail-in. In addition, ENS has been proactive in adapting their Instant Rebates offerings to the evolving market by r...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program highlights the need for process improvements, including reviewing eligibility criteria, improving data tracking, connecting participants with non-lighting contractors, and analyzing incentive levels for non-lighting measures. These recommendations aim to enhance program performance and savings accuracy.
Table 6: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for BER 2017 Recommendations Status 2017 BER-R1. Continue to monitor the market evolution of LED lamps and adapt the BER offer when needed. Implemented 2017 BER-R2. Identify opportunit...
AI summary The table outlines the implementation status of 2017 recommendations for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. ENS is continuing market analysis on LED lighting to adapt the BER offer as the market evolves quickly.
BER Instant Rebates Since participant information is not tracked systematically for Instant Rebates, the number of participants is unknown. Available information does indicate the number of rebated measures sold by distributors. Figure 4 b...
AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program saw a significant increase in participation in 2018, with 506,533 rebated measures sold, driven in part by a single customer purchasing 67,311 LED measures. LED downlight lamps contributed the largest share of gross savings in 2018, followed by LED linear fixtures and outdoor LED fixtures. The average unitary savings increased to 150 kWh in 2018.
2 BER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the BER evaluation are as follows: - › Assessing the effectiveness of BER design and delivery - › Reporting on participant and partner perspectives - › Calculating program...
AI summary The BER evaluation objectives include assessing the program's effectiveness, reporting on stakeholder perspectives, calculating energy and GHG savings, and analyzing LED lamp market evolution. The methodology involved document reviews, meetings with program managers, and statistical sampling with a 10% margin of error at a 90% confidence level.
Interviews with Contractors As part of the process evaluation, Research Into Action conducted 15 interviews with Mail-in participating contractors in October and November 2018. These interviews mainly served to inform the Evaluator on thre...
AI summary Research Into Action conducted 15 interviews with Mail-in participating contractors in 2018 to evaluate the service, focusing on increasing interest in non-lighting measures, the relationship between Mail-in and Instant Rebates, and the need for rebate adjustments. The interview guide is detailed in Appendix III.
BER Service Offers and Logic for Lighting Measures BER-eligible measures are offered through both Instant Rebates and Mail-in. Instant Rebates provides point-of-purchase rebates through participating distributors, whereas Mail-in requires...
AI summary The BER program offers lighting measures through Instant Rebates and Mail-in services. Instant Rebates provide point-of-purchase rebates, while Mail-in requires applications. Some measures are exclusive to Mail-in, such as high-bay luminaires. In 2018, downlight luminaires and linear replacement lamps were major contributors to savings under both services, while high-bay and pole-mounted luminaires were primarily Mail-in-specific.
New Construction vs. Retrofit The Instant Rebates participant survey sample included 30 end users who purchased eligible lighting measures for their own businesses and 20 contractors who purchased them for clients. For a majority of contra...
AI summary The Instant Rebates and Mail-in programs serve both new construction and retrofit projects. Contractors predominantly purchased lighting measures for new construction, while end users through BER focused more on retrofit projects. The Evaluator found that Mail-in participants mostly used lighting measures for retrofit projects.
Jurisdictional Review The Evaluator performed a brief jurisdictional review of business programs elsewhere in Canada to determine how BER design compared. This review included the following utilities: BC Hydro, Energy Efficiency Alberta, M...
AI summary A jurisdictional review of business energy programs in Canada was conducted, comparing Nova Scotia's BER program with similar programs from other utilities. The review found that most utilities require pre-approval for mail-in rebates, unlike ENS which offers instant rebates.
Suggestions to Generate Interest in Non-lighting Measures According to non-lighting Mail-in contractors, there are no measures that they avoid promoting, and they already promote a range of measure types. Typically, contractors that use th...
AI summary Non-lighting Mail-in contractors promote a range of measures, with HVAC contractors emphasizing heat pumps despite low incentives. Contractors suggest promoting roof-top units and improving control sequencing for better participation. Most participants are satisfied with the current list of BER Mail-in measures, and past participation in ENS programs influences continued engagement.
Satisfaction with Instant Rebates The 11 interviewed Instant Rebates distributors provided an overall satisfaction rating of 7.7 out of 10 when considering the service overall (using a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means "not at all satisfied...
AI summary The 11 interviewed Instant Rebates distributors rated their overall satisfaction at 7.7 out of 10. Issues included administrative complexity, eligibility tracking, and challenges with contractor access. ENS staff support and communication received a 7.9 rating, but difficulties in contacting staff were noted. Rebate processing and reporting received a 7/10 rating, with distributors citing cumbersome data entry processes.
Satisfaction with BER Incentives Mail-in participants noted that, generally, received incentives were what they expected, and the time to receive the incentives was as anticipated (see Figure 11). Figure 11: Participant Satisfaction with I...
AI summary Participants in the BER program generally found the incentives to be as expected, though some suggested increasing incentives for specific LED products and non-lighting measures. Contractors indicated that higher incentives for HVAC and refrigeration measures could foster more interest in these areas.
Table 10: Adjustment Ratios per BER Mail-in Measure Category per of sures Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Measure Category Total Sample Calculated Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Extrapo- lated Overall Adjustment Ratio Calculated Adjus...
AI summary Table 10 presents adjustment ratios for various BER measure categories, including energy savings and peak demand savings. The data shows calculated and overall adjustment ratios, along with margins of error and extrapolation status for each category.
Interactive Effects When a measure implemented as part of BER Mail-in is affected by interactive effects, this is taken into account by the gross savings standard equation presented in the CIRx Screening Tool. For BER, interactive effects...
AI summary The document discusses how interactive effects are considered in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, particularly for lighting projects, using the CIRx Screening Tool to adjust factors based on site visits and observations by the Evaluator.
Revised Gross Savings The savings achieved by Mail-in measure category are presented in Table 11 further below. Both the energy and peak demand savings were revised by applying the adjustment ratios discussed in Subsection 4.1.1. The savin...
AI summary The revised gross savings for the BER Mail-in measure category are calculated using adjustment ratios and line loss factors provided by NSP. The total gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are 24.596 GWh and 3.702 MW, with lifetime energy savings of 379.986 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 15.4 years.
4.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use attributable specifically to Mail-in Rebates. Net savings were estimated by applying the above NTGR to the revised gross savings, as illustrated in the following equation...
AI summary Net savings from BER Mail-in rebates are calculated using a revised gross savings and NTGR, resulting in 20.414 GWh energy savings and 3.073 MW peak demand savings. These savings avoided 12,506 tonnes of CO2 eq annually. The net lifetime energy savings are 315.388 GWh, with a weighted average EUL value of 15.4 years.
Table 13: Revised Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in Ca Me te as ur e g or y C H V A L ig h in t g Re fr ig io t er a n M d V to o rs a n F Ds Co d A m p re ss e ir Ag ic l l tu r u ra En Sa in er g y v g s Re ise d G En Sa...
AI summary Table 13 presents revised net energy and peak demand savings for the BER Mail-in program, detailing energy savings and peak demand reductions across various sectors such as commercial, residential, and agricultural. The table includes metrics like revised gross energy savings, net energy savings, effective life, and peak demand savings in gigawatt-hours and megawatts.
Revised Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in (Continued) Me Ca te as ur e g or y K i he tc n W He in te t a r a g Pu in m p g So la r fo To l A l l ta r Ca ies te g or En Sa in er g y v g s Re ise d G En Sa ing he M ( G W h )...
AI summary The document presents revised net energy and peak demand savings for the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) mail-in program, including various metrics such as energy savings, peak demand savings, and effective useful life in years. These figures are categorized under different headings and are presented in a table format.
Table 15: Adjustment Ratios per BER Instant Rebates Measure Category Measure Category Energy Savings Adjustment Ratio Demand Savings Adjustment Ratio LED Linear Fixtures 1.000 1.000 LED Linear Lamps 1.009 1.009 LED General-use and Decorati...
AI summary The document presents adjustment ratios for various energy efficiency measures under the BER Instant Rebates program. ENS applied recommended usage and wattage values, with adjustments made for specific items such as occupancy sensors and LED downlight fixtures.
In-service Rates To establish ISRs, the Evaluator conducted a literature review in 2016 of other jurisdictions with an upstream commercial program service similar to Instant Rebates because research indicates that a percentage of purchased...
AI summary The Evaluator established In-Service Rates (ISRs) based on a 2016 literature review, applying an 85% ISR for LED lamps and 100% for other measures like fixtures and pumps. This approach was later applied in 2018 across all measure categories, with results aligning with Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) tracking.
Peak Demand Savings Since no on-site visits were conducted for Instant Rebates in 2018, no PCF specific to the lighting measures sold through the service could be established. Hence, a PCF of 62.4 percent was applied to Instant Rebates. Th...
AI summary The text discusses the application of Peak Cost Factors (PCF) to different energy efficiency measures. A 62.4% PCF was used for indoor lighting measures based on past data, while 100% PCF was applied to outdoor lighting and circulator pumps due to their continuous or predictable usage patterns.
Revised Gross Savings The energy and peak demand savings associated with Instant Rebates were calculated using the unitary savings values, ISRs, and interactive effects factors revised as part of this evaluation. The savings at the generat...
AI summary The revised gross savings for Instant Rebates were calculated based on unitary savings values and interactive effects factors. The generator-level energy savings amounted to 76.053 GWh, with a total lifetime energy savings of 716.364 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 9.4 years. Peak demand savings were estimated at 11.144 MW.
Table 17: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates Ca Me te as ur e g or y L in D F L E ea r ix tu re s L in D La L E ea r m p s Ge l-u d ne ra se a n ive De t L E D co ra La m p s Re f le L E D to c r La m p s...
AI summary Table 17 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, including various metrics such as number of units, energy savings, and adjustment ratios for different categories.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Me Ca te as ur e g or y D ire io l a d t c na n Ar h i l L E D F ix te tu tu c c ra re s Oc cu p an cy Se ns or s Pu m p s fo To l A l l ta r Me as ur es L in...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BER instant rebates, including metrics such as effective useful life, total gross energy savings, and peak demand savings across various categories.
5.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to Instant Rebates. Net savings were estimated by applying the overall NTGR presented above to the revised gross savings, as exemplifie...
AI summary Net savings are calculated using the Netting and Transfer Guidance Ratio (NTGR) applied to revised gross savings. Total net energy and peak demand savings are estimated at 54.884 GWh and 8.255 MW, respectively, leading to 35,622 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. These calculations use a 2017 Nova Scotia-specific GHG factor and data from Nova Scotia Power.
Table 20: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates Ca Me te as ur e g or y L E D L in ea r F ix tu re s L E D L in r La ea m p s L E D Ge l-u d ne ra se a n De ive La t co ra m p s D Re L E f le to r La c m p s...
AI summary Table 20 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, detailing metrics such as energy savings, peak demand reduction, and effective useful life for various lighting fixtures and programs.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Ca Me te as ur e g or y L E D D ire io l a d t c na n Ar h i l F ix te tu tu c c ra re s Oc cu p an cy Se ns or s Pu m p s To l fo A l l ta r Me as ur es Sa E...
AI summary This table evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, showing various metrics such as energy savings in gigawatt-hours, peak demand savings in megawatts, and effective useful life in years across different categories like LED directional and occupancy sensors, pumps, and total measures.
Table 22: Comparison of Overall Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for BER Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 101.271 GWh 101.271 GWh 0.76 77.208 GWh Evaluation Resu...
AI summary Table 22 compares tracked and evaluated savings for the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program, including energy and peak demand savings. ENS Tracked Savings and Evaluation Results are presented for both energy and peak demand, with adjustments made based on the Netting and Transfer Guidance Ratio (NTGR).
Table 23: Overall Participation and Savings for BER Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Mail-in Rebates Mail-in Rebates Energy Savings 24.596 GWh 0.83 20.414 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 366 projects 379.986 GWh 0.83 315.388...
AI summary Table 23 presents the overall participation and savings for the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program, including energy and peak demand savings, NTGR values, and net savings for both mail-in and instant rebate categories. It highlights the cumulative impact of the program across various metrics.
7.1 Market Indicators The Evaluator analyzed available market data and established key market indicators to understand the state of the Nova Scotia LED market. For this analysis, the Evaluator relied on data from Instant Rebates since sale...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed market data to understand the state of the Nova Scotia LED market, relying on Instant Rebates data due to its detailed documentation of sales quantities and prices, which is not available for Mail-in lighting category measures.
BER Participating Distributor Outlook BER Instant Rebates collaborates with distributors to provide rebates on lighting measures to BNI participants. The overall number of distributors reporting LED sales has varied slightly throughout the...
AI summary The BER Participating Distributor Outlook discusses the adoption of LED lighting technologies across Nova Scotia. Distributors report that LED downlight fixtures are growing but nearing maturity, while LED linear fixtures are in sustained growth. LED linear lamps and general-use decorative LEDs are nearing maturity, with decreasing costs and increased customer awareness.
Retail LED Prices As prices vary greatly among LED lighting types, the evolution of LED prices was examined for the most popular lighting categories offered under Instant Rebates. Figure 15 further below illustrates the evolution of averag...
AI summary The document discusses the decreasing trend in retail prices for LED lighting categories from 2015 to 2018, including downlight fixtures, linear fixtures, general-use and decorative lamps, and linear lamps. It also notes the corresponding decline in rebate amounts offered by ENS under the Instant Rebates program.
8 BER RECOMMENDATIONS The 2018 impact evaluation revealed that the accuracy of reported savings had improved, especially for Mail-in. In addition, ENS has been proactive in adapting their Instant Rebates offerings to the evolving market by...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation highlights improvements in reported savings accuracy for Mail-in and Instant Rebates, but identifies process issues, including overlapping eligibility and limited data tracking. Recommendations focus on aligning BER logic models, improving data systems, connecting participants with non-lighting contractors, and adjusting incentive levels for non-lighting measures with longer payback periods.
CONCLUSION The 2018 evaluation revealed that BER largely surpassed planned energy and peak demand savings, which were 50.6 GWh and 7.9 MW respectively, by achieving 75.298 GWh in net energy savings, the highest savings level in its history...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program showed significant energy and peak demand savings, surpassing initial targets. Instant Rebates and Mail-in services contributed substantially, with lighting measures being the most popular. The program achieved 75.298 GWh in net energy savings and avoided 46,128 tonnes of CO2 eq annually.
BER Appendix I - BER: Mail-in Participant Survey Questionnaire Appendix II - BER: Mail-in Participant Survey Results Appendix III - BER: Mail-in Interview Guide with Contractors Appendix IV - BER: Mail-in On-site Visit Sampling Methodology...
AI summary The document outlines various appendices related to the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program, including survey questionnaires, results, interview guides, sampling methodologies, savings calculations, and recommendations. These appendices support the evaluation and administration of the BER program.
Program Awareness and Participation (P Series) - P1. Prior to your most recent Business Energy Rebates Program incented project, have you participated in projects that received Efficiency Nova Scotia incentives before? [CODE ONLY ONE] - 1....
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to program awareness and participation, specifically focusing on prior involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and the influence of past participation on recent Business Energy Rebates projects. It includes options for responses and details about various incentive programs.
FR2. A RANGE Efficiency Nova Scotia paid your organization $[REBATE VALUE FROM SAMPLE BY CATEGORY] for the energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures. If your organization had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would yo...
AI summary The text discusses a rebate program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, asking respondents about their likelihood of implementing energy-efficient measures without the rebate. It includes questions about lighting products and their certification, as well as the impact of the rebate on purchasing decisions.
FR3c. [IF FR2≥5] If the program rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed implementing the [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures by at least one year? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR4. Using a scale from...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to energy-efficient measure implementation, including the influence of program rebates and information from program representatives, as well as the use of payback period thresholds in decision-making.
READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUENCES - CI1. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program in [DATE], had your organization at any time in the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document contains a series of questions aimed at understanding the factors influencing participation in the Business Energy Rebates program. It explores prior participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, the influence of promotional materials, and the use of contractors from the Efficiency Trade Network.
b. [ASK S4b IF S3b <8] Interaction and communication with contractors or distributors 1. (Lack of communication/availability with contractor/distributor) 2. (Less knowledgeable about the program) 3. (Took too long/Communication was slow) 9...
AI summary The text outlines barriers related to interaction with contractors, rebate amounts, and processing times, highlighting issues such as lack of communication, slow processing, and dissatisfaction with rebate sizes. These points are part of a broader discussion on barriers and recommendations.
FR2. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid your organization $[REBATE VALUE FROM SAMPLE BY CATEGORY] for the energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures. If your organization had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have p...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia provided a rebate for energy-efficient measures. The question asks if the organization would have paid the full cost without the rebate.
Would Have Paid 201 15 2016 2017 201 18 Cost of Project Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0 = "Definitely Would Not Have Paid" 10 = "Definitely Would Have Paid") Paid cost of project 72 5.6 69 6.7 70...
AI summary The text presents survey data on awareness and willingness to pay for energy efficiency programs, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates Program. Respondents were asked about their awareness of premium lighting products and their actions if the program had not been available. Results indicate a moderate level of awareness and a tendency to implement similar measures even without the program.
FR5c. Just to be sure I understand correctly, you are saying that the measure was already attractive enough in terms of financial payback to be implemented without the rebate? Payback Period was Short Enough 2016 2016 2017 2016 2017 2 Samp...
AI summary The discussion centers on the financial payback period of energy efficiency measures and whether they were attractive enough to be implemented without rebates. It also explores the presence of energy efficiency processes and policies in facilities, and whether projects with longer payback periods were implemented.
Importance That Contractor is Listed Under the ETN 2018 Sample Size Mean Mean (1 = "Not at all important" 10 = "Highly important") Influence of past participation 13 7.8 Base: Respondents used a contractor listed on ENS's ETN S1. Using a s...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of contractors being listed under the Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) Energy Trust Network (ETN) and evaluates customer satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program over the years 2016 to 2018. It also highlights reasons for dissatisfaction with the BER program.
B6. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is not at all likely and 10 is highly likely, how likely are you to seek Efficiency Nova Scotia incentives for these future upgrades? 2018 Likelihood of Seeking ENS Incentives for Future Upgrades Sample Si...
AI summary The text presents survey results regarding the likelihood of seeking Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) incentives for future energy efficiency upgrades, with a mean score of 9.7 out of 10. It also includes reasons why some respondents are not considering efficiency upgrades beyond lighting, such as equipment already being efficient or financial constraints.
Suggestions to Improve BER Mail-in Service 2018 Sample Size 70 No recommendation 59% Make forms more user-friendly 14% Better marketing/awareness 10% Provide more information/information sessions 7% Increase/better rebates 6% ENS staff sho...
AI summary The document presents survey results from 2018 regarding suggestions to improve the Business Energy Rebate (BER) mail-in service. The majority of respondents (59%) had no recommendations, while others suggested making forms more user-friendly, better marketing, providing more information, and improving rebate processes.
Overview of Data Collection Activity Descriptor This Instrument Instrument Type In-depth interview Estimated Time to Complete 30 minutes Population Description Contractors familiar with the mail-in rebate program Sampling Strata Definition...
AI summary The document outlines an in-depth interview instrument aimed at contractors familiar with the mail-in rebate program, with data collection managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia and fielded by Research Into Action staff. It also provides a brief description of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program.
Instrument Name: Date: Interviewer: Thanks for taking the time to talk today. I work for Research Into Action, a subcontractor to Econoler, and we have been asked by Efficiency Nova Scotia to conduct the process evaluation for the Business...
AI summary The interview discusses the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, its implementation, and its relationship with other Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. The focus is on understanding how the program functions for contractors and how to increase interest in non-lighting measures such as pumps and heating and cooling equipment.
[ASK IF RESPONDENT IDs UNDER REPRESENTED MARKET SEGMENTS] Q14. What type of measures or equipment do you think would appeal to these market segments? [ASK IF Q2 <>1] Q15. LED lighting measures are increasingly becoming more popular among t...
AI summary The text includes questions about market segments, lighting measures, and the promotion of non-lighting measures or services by ENS and the BER program. It also asks about the percentage of equipment sold through the ENS BER Mail-in program and without incentives.
[ASK IF NOT SPECIFIED IN Q19] Q20. Are you familiar with the BER Instant Rebate program? [ If needed: This is the program that provides incentives to lighting and pump distributors to offered discounted equipment to contractors .]
AI summary The question asks if the respondent is familiar with the BER Instant Rebate program, which provides incentives to lighting and pump distributors to offer discounted equipment to contractors.
[ASK IF USE OTHER ENS PROGRAM] Q21. How, if at all, do you promote the BER Mail-program to customers using other ENS programs? [ASK IF Q2=1] Q22. How does BER mail-in participation influence your customer's participation in other ENS progr...
AI summary The questions focus on how the BER Mail-in program interacts with other ENS programs, customer awareness of incentives, and potential integration opportunities. They also ask about participation rates and preferences between the BER Mail-in and Instant Rebate programs for different lighting types.
Sampling Methodology The 2018 BER sample covered 78 projects, with six projects being counted in more than one measure category. These visits were rolled out as a first sample of 47 and a second sample of 31. The plan for the first sample...
AI summary The 2018 BER sample included 78 projects, with two samples conducted in July and September 2018. The sampling methodology used tracked savings to determine sample sizes, focusing on lighting, motors and drives, and HVAC measures, which accounted for the majority of tracked savings.
On-site Visit Protocol The on-site visit protocol was only slightly modified from the 2017 BER protocol since eligible measures were similar. The main change for 2018 was adding columns to input the tracked values in addition to the values...
AI summary The on-site visit protocol for 2018 was slightly modified from the 2017 BER protocol, with added columns for tracked values and equipment age. The protocol includes general and measure-specific sections, with data collected from project documentation and on-site visits. Most fields were pre-filled based on ENS-provided information.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Commercial Dish Washers Quantity Installed: Location: Product type Manufacturer: Model number: Is the equipment used for commercial purpose? Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? High or...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and validation form for commercial energy equipment, including dish washers and fryers. It collects data on installation quantity, location, product type, manufacturer, model number, usage, and energy efficiency certification.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Validate the equipment is ENERGY STAR certified: Is the equipment still used? If not, why? Commercial Ice Makers Ice making head Location Quantity Installed: Product Type Manufacturer: Model number: Harves...
AI summary The text presents a tracking sheet for validating the use and certification status of commercial ice makers, including details on equipment type, manufacturer, model, and usage. The form asks whether the equipment is still in use and whether it replaces non-certified ENERGY STAR ice makers.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Steam Cookers Quantity Installed: Location: Manufacturer: Model number: Product Type: Operation Days/yr: Operation Hours/yr: Number of pans per unit: Number of pans per day: Explanation if different: Valid...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and validation form for energy-efficient equipment installations, including steam cookers, commercial convection ovens, and griddles. It collects details such as location, manufacturer, model numbers, usage data, and ENERGY STAR certification verification.
- P10. I just want to make sure I understand When you purchased [PRODUCT], you were unaware that a rebate was given to reduce the product's total cost? Aware of Product Rebate prior to Purchase 2018 Sample Size 50 Yes 92% No 8% P11. [ASK I...
AI summary The proceeding discusses customer awareness of rebates for energy-efficient products, specifically whether customers were aware of the rebate before purchasing and whether they knew it was offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia as part of its Business Energy Rebates Program. Survey results show high awareness in both cases.
FR1a. Had you already decided to purchase [PRODUCT] before knowing that these products were rebated? Already Made Decision to Purchase Product Before Knowing about Rebate 2018 Sample Size 46 Yes 59% No 39% Don't know 2% Base: Respondents w...
AI summary The document presents survey results on customer purchasing behavior regarding rebated products. In 2018, 59% of respondents who were aware of rebates had already decided to purchase products before knowing about the rebate, and 52% had already decided to purchase before knowing the product price. A mean score of 5.7 indicates moderate willingness to pay the full cost of efficient lighting products if rebates were not available.
FR4. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means "No influence" and 10 means "Great influence", please rate the influence of each of the following in your organization's decision to purchase [PRODUCT]. 2018 Influence of Factors in Decision t...
AI summary The document presents a survey on the influence of various factors in the decision to purchase energy-efficient products, with a focus on the mean ratings from respondents. The program rebate, prevalence of LED products, and information received from distributors and program representatives are discussed.
ASK IF LINEAR LED FIXTURES WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM I have a few questions about your sales of linear LED fixtures that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. This category includes the following measures (as defined...
AI summary The text discusses inquiries regarding the rebate of linear LED fixtures through the Business Energy Rebates Program, specifically referencing Efficiency Nova Scotia's rebate schedule and sales data up to September 2018. It also asks whether the trend in sales of these fixtures is expected to continue or change by the end of 2018.
- B1a. [ASK IF SALES DATA NON AVAILABLE] If the current trend is maintained, do you think you will sell more, less or the same number of LED downlight fixtures by the end of 2018 than the number of units you sold in 2017? If "more" or "les...
AI summary The text includes questions about LED downlight fixture sales trends, the impact of incentives on sales, and the percentage of fixtures sold for residential use. It references the 2018 DSM Evaluation Report and the Business Energy Rebates Program.
- C1a. [ASK IF SALES DATA NON AVAILABLE] If the current trend is maintained, do you think you will sell more, less or the same number of LED linear lamps by the end of 2018 than the number of units you sold in 2017? If "more" or "less", ho...
AI summary The document asks whether the sales trend of LED linear lamps will continue in 2018 and whether the Business Energy Rebates Program's incentives influenced the number of lamps sold. It also explores factors such as market trends and competitor activity.
- C2b. [IF LOWER] In your estimation, by what percentage would the number of LED linear lamps you sold have been lower in 2018, if the Business Energy Rebates Program incentive had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% RECORD EXPLANAT...
AI summary The question asks about the estimated percentage decrease in LED linear lamp sales in 2018 if the Business Energy Rebates Program had not been available, with a placeholder for the recorded percentage and explanation.
SECTION O: Process Questions - O1. Generally, how aware are contractors that they are getting an incentive from ENS for buying energy efficient equipment through the Business Energy Rebates Instant-Rebate program? - O2. Generally, how awar...
AI summary The section asks about awareness of ENS incentives through the Business Energy Rebates Instant-Rebate program, contractor and customer awareness, and the sufficiency of incentives for specific LED products. It also inquires about familiarity with ENS programs and the distribution of sales through different incentive services.
Commercial Lighting Measures Thirty-four (34) lighting projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 141 different commercial lighting measures. - › Adjustments were limited, resulting in adjustment ratios of 0.984 for tracked energy savings...
AI summary In 2018, 34 lighting projects were evaluated, with adjustments made to energy and demand savings due to outliers, data discrepancies, and errors. Adjustments included revising HOUs, efficient wattages, and addressing incompatible fixtures. Most metrics were tracked accurately, with high success rates for CF, IE/IEpd, and Wb.
Commercial Refrigeration Measures Eight (8) refrigeration projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 24 different commercial refrigeration measures. - › Adjustments were required for all revised projects, resulting in adjustment ratios of...
AI summary In 2018, eight refrigeration projects with 24 commercial refrigeration measures were evaluated. Adjustments were made to energy and peak demand savings based on site data, with specific changes to motor and fan parameters. Adjustments were extrapolated due to high margins of error, and no on-site visits were conducted for data collection.
Recommended Savings The outdoor LED fixtures category contains outdoor wall-mounted area luminaires, as well as the architectural flood and spot luminaires subcategories with the majority of fixtures belonging to the latter. In 2018, ENS a...
AI summary The document discusses the outdoor LED fixtures category, including subcategories like wall-mounted area luminaires, architectural flood, and spot luminaires. ENS updated its service offer in 2018 to include non-cutoff and semi-cutoff wall-mounted area luminaires, previously covered only by the Mail-in program. Baseline wattages are based on 2017 recommended values and use a weighted average of metal halide and high-pressure sodium fixture wattages.
APPENDIX XIV BER: INSTANT REBATES EFFECTIVE USEFUL LIFE This appendix presents the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the BER Instant Rebates service. First, the EUL of lighting products are presente...
AI summary This appendix outlines the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for product types in the BER Instant Rebates service, starting with lighting products and followed by other rebated measures.
Table 1: 2018 Overall Participation and Savings for Custom Incentives Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Custom Energy Savings 14.315 GWh 0.81 11.603 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 69 projects completed 196.661 GWh 0.79 156.07...
AI summary Table 1 presents 2018 participation levels and savings for custom incentives, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings across different programs such as Energy Savings, EMIS, and SEM. The table also includes metrics like NTGR and net savings for each category.
New Construction Process and Market Evaluation The key research question identified by previous evaluations and ENS staff was how to increase participation in New Construction. The evaluation aimed to answer this question by understanding...
AI summary This evaluation focuses on the New Construction process and market, examining challenges in SP awareness, client engagement, and program participation. Key issues include low client inquiries about ENS incentives, lack of clarity on service requirements, and barriers such as project timeline concerns. SPs highlight benefits like offsetting capital expenditures and suggest improving outreach to commercial clients and professional associations.
Energy Management Information System The main goal of EMIS is to assist industrial businesses and institutions in making real-time decisions about their processes using energy consumption data from metered systems. To achieve this goal, EM...
AI summary The Energy Management Information System (EMIS) assists industrial businesses and institutions in making real-time energy decisions through audits, implementation plans, and metering equipment. The 2018 evaluation of EMIS included documentation reviews, interviews, and project assessments.
Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.681 GWh 1.681 GWh 1.00 1.681 GWh Evaluation Results 1.681 GWh 1.548 GWh 0.94 1.455 GWh Peak Demand Savings ENS Tracked Savings 0.000 MW 0.00...
AI summary The evaluated gross energy savings were 8% below tracked values due to incorrect tracking of savings from capital projects. An adjustment to savings from a lighting project installed through BER Instant Rebates caused net savings to be 13% lower than tracked savings.
4.1.4 Effective Useful Life For each of the 25 sampled projects, the Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life (EUL) values based on the literature review performed in 2017 and on an analysis of each project baseline. The Evaluator foun...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed 25 projects to assess their effective useful life (EUL) values and found that 13 required adjustments due to incorrect categorization or dual-baseline issues. Adjustments resulted in a weighted average adjustment ratio of 0.940, and EULs for 2018 projects were reduced from 12.2 to 11.2 years.
6.1.1 Project Review Findings The on-site visits served to establish that all energy efficiency measures had been implemented in the four visited buildings. The project reviews and on-site visits revealed that reported savings calculations...
AI summary The project review found that energy savings calculations for four buildings were overestimated due to incorrect base case assumptions, mechanical system modelling inconsistencies, and incomplete commissioning. The largest adjustment was for a project with an ice rink and ventilation systems, where savings were reduced by 76%. Documentation was also incomplete for two projects, affecting the accuracy of energy models.
11.1 Description EMIS offers incentives in the form of rebates or zero-percent on-bill financing to help facilities reduce their electricity consumption through the implementation of an energy management information system. First introduce...
AI summary EMIS provides rebates and zero-percent on-bill financing to help industrial businesses and institutions reduce electricity consumption through energy management information systems. The program, which became a stand-alone component of the Custom Incentives program in 2015, includes audits, implementation plans, and technical support. In 2018, EMIS aimed for 0.90 GWh in net electricity savings and 0.2 MW in net peak demand savings.
15.1 Description SEM was launched in 2014 as a pilot to provide industrial and institutional participants with funding and support to implement energy management practices within their organizations. The program component became a part of...
AI summary SEM, launched in 2014, supports industrial and institutional participants in implementing energy management practices. It provides tools, training, and audits to achieve energy savings and improve long-term performance. Participants must commit to 12 months of involvement, with an option for a second year. SEM aimed for 0.7 GWh in electrical savings and 0.1 MW in peak demand savings in 2018.
ew of each regression workbook to verify that each of the four models were statistically significant and that any routine and non-routine adjustments needed to calculate 2018 savings had been applied. The tracked savings of all four partic...
AI summary The evaluation of energy savings from four participants in 2018 showed minimal adjustments, primarily due to discrepancies between tracked and reported savings. The Evaluator estimated peak demand savings as an average of energy savings, considering that most savings were driven by production levels and facilities operated during peak hours.
18.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to SEM. Since one project had some savings reported through SEM that resulted from participation in BER Instant Rebates, the Evaluator...
AI summary Net savings from the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program are calculated after adjusting for savings attributed to BER Instant Rebates, using a Non-Technology Grant Rate (NTGR) of 0.63. The adjusted energy savings amount to 88,701 Whk, with peak demand savings proportionally deducted. Total net savings are 1.455 GWh and 0.190 MW.
Using the Nova Scotia-specific factor23 for greenhouse gas emissions generated by electricity production, 0.6126 kg CO2 eq/kWh, it was estimated that the net energy savings resulted in 891 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. Based on an equ...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from the SEM program, using a Nova Scotia-specific factor to estimate avoided greenhouse gas emissions. It also notes a discrepancy in the NTGR value due to an adjustment for the BER Instant Rebates project, with a recommendation to use a NTGR of 1.00 in 2019.
Table 24: Comparison of SEM Total Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.681 GWh 1.681 GWh 1.00 1.681 GWh Evaluation Results 1.681 G...
AI summary The table compares energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENS and evaluated results. Evaluated gross energy savings were 8% lower than tracked due to incorrect tracking of savings from capital projects and adjustments made by the Evaluator after the tracking sheet was submitted. Net savings were 13% below tracked savings.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The program financial incentives Response 97 N/A 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. The recommendations and technical assistance provided by the Business Development Manager or other ENS staff in selecting...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to energy efficiency programs and responses, including questions about financial incentives, technical assistance, and decision-making criteria such as payback period thresholds. The responses are categorized as N/A, Don't Know, or Refused.
Spillover - SO1. Since the time that you participated in the Custom Retrofit program, have you implemented some additional energy efficiency measures other than those implemented through the program? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [THANK AND...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to energy efficiency measures implemented by participants in the Custom Retrofit program, including whether additional measures were taken, financing or rebate requests, and detailed descriptions of the measures, their locations, and estimated savings.
Small Business Energy Solutions SBES offers incentives and resources to Nova Scotia small businesses to encourage them to make smart energy efficient upgrades in their facilities. To be eligible, businesses must annually consume less than...
AI summary SBES provides incentives for Nova Scotia small businesses with annual electricity consumption under 350,000 kWh. Eligibility is determined using electricity consumption data from NSP or municipal utilities. In 2018, ENS updated application forms and four participants completed projects under the AMH pilot, which targets affordable housing.
SBES Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed ENS gross savings estimates using the information contained in the tracking sheet, the CIRx Screening Tool, and findings from the on-site visits. Overall, this review found continued improvement i...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed ENS gross savings estimates for SBES Energy Savings, noting improvements in DIY project accuracy but significant adjustments due to inaccuracies in tracked HOUs and peak coincidence factors. Audit path savings were also adjusted due to various issues, leading to an overall adjustment ratio of 0.811. Free-ridership values from 2017 were reapplied in 2018, and spillover was found to be nil. Net energy and peak demand savings in 2018 were 9.589 GWh and 1.441 MW respectively.
On-site Visit Protocol for Participant Visits The SBES protocol was developed based on the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Mail-in protocol, the installed measures are very similar, with the exception of building envelope insulation upgrades...
AI summary The SBES protocol was developed using the BER Mail-in protocol, with similar installed measures except for building envelope insulation upgrades. The protocol includes an Excel-based format with measure-specific data entry fields. In 2018, new questions were added to collect information about participants' knowledge and interest in measures beyond lighting.
EFFECTIVE USEFUL LIFE This appendix discusses the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the SBES program component. First, the EUL of lighting products is discussed and then, the EULs of the other types...
AI summary This appendix discusses the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the SBES program component, starting with lighting products and then covering other types of measures rebated through SBES.
per EnerGuide point at 1,521 kWh/year. Using the overestimation ratio of 16 percent resulting from the billing analysis, the final savings value per EnerGuide point was established at 1,278 kWh/year. The literature review conducted by the...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for residential buildings in Nova Scotia, considering the use of electricity as the primary heating source in new homes and the impact of building codes on compliance rates. It also references a survey by ENS and the application of an overestimation ratio from billing analysis.
In Amendment 13, NRCan specifies the average unitary savings values for Tier I and Tier II clothes washer categories according to their water heating sources, as listed in Table 28 below.56 Higherefficiency clothes washers use less water i...
AI summary Amendment 13 outlines average unitary savings values for Tier I and Tier II clothes washers based on water heating sources. Higher efficiency washers reduce water usage, leading to savings in domestic hot water heating, especially if electrically heated. The Evaluator used 2018 Instant Savings evaluation data to calculate a weighted average for Nova Scotia.
Table 43: Unitary Savings Values for Tier II General-service Fluorescent Lamps Product Class Unitary Savings Value (kWh) Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 26 W (standard-output) 0.2 Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 49 W (high-output...
AI summary Table 43 presents unitary savings values for Tier II general-service fluorescent lamps across various product classes and sizes, distinguishing between residential and commercial and industrial (C&I) categories. The values indicate energy savings in kWh for different lamp types and configurations.
Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of C&S, replacing lamps with more efficient products causes...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically focusing on how replacing lamps with more efficient products affects heating and cooling loads. The Evaluator used factors derived from past evaluations and onsite visits to calculate these effects for residential and commercial/industrial lamps, adjusting for factors like recessed fixtures.
Table 49: Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class NRCan Share of Class Shipments in 2017 Actual Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2018 Com – 2 lamp med bi-pin (IS) 4-ft 84% 16,402 Ind – 2 lamp med bi-pi...
AI summary Table 49 presents market size estimates for fluorescent lamp ballast shipments in Nova Scotia in 2018, categorized by product class and usage (commercial, industrial, residential), with data on NRCan share of class shipments in 2017 and actual shipments in 2018.
Table 50: Estimated Portion of the Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Market Impacted by the Regulation Product Class Percentage of Total Projected Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 2018 Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the...
AI summary Table 50 provides an estimate of the portion of the fluorescent lamp ballast market in Nova Scotia impacted by a regulation in 2018, showing percentages of total projected shipments affected and the number of shipments for different product classes.
Table 52: Interactive Effects for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Product Class Energy Interactive Effects Factor Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Com – 2 lamp med bi-pin (IS) 4-ft -2.32% - Ind – 2 lamp med bi-pin (IS) 4-ft -2.32% - Res –...
AI summary Table 52 presents interactive effects for various fluorescent lamp ballasts, showing energy and peak demand effects for different product classes and usage categories (commercial, industrial, residential). The data indicates significant differences in impact across categories, particularly for residential applications.
3.8 Total Savings at the Generator Incremental annual energy savings at the meter were calculated by taking into account all product categories for which information about the market size, non-compliance rates, and unitary savings values w...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of incremental annual energy savings at the generator, taking into account transmission and distribution losses for different sectors. It also estimates the 2018 overall energy and peak demand savings for C&S and the corresponding avoided CO2 emissions based on Nova Scotia Power's 2017 data.