Topic:"Energy Efficiency Financing" in M12768

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-5: 2 3 Please refer to PDF page 3, "Load Variations." Did PHP's lower-than-forecasted demand 4 increase system costs, such as through retention of higher capacity, higher reserves, greater 5 unit commitment, o...

AI summary The response to Request IR-5 explains that PHP's lower-than-forecasted demand did not affect NS Power's long-term procurement decisions, such as gas and power RFPs, as PHP load is not currently included in these decisions. The modeling in PortOps ensures PHP pays for all generation serving its demand.

Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to IG Information Requests 1 Request IR-13: 15 (e) In light of this determination, does NSPI plan to modify or enhance any cost or...

AI summary NSPI responded to an information request regarding whether it plans to modify or enhance cost or load tracking practices under the ELIADC or proposed ELID to accurately track hourly load-shifting benefits or costs. NSPI indicated that prior internal discussions with experts suggested the feasibility of a recommendation was questionable, and subsequent attempts to construct software models confirmed it was not feasible.

1 Request IR-1: 26 reported monthly, quarterly or annually? 27 28 Response IR-4: 29 30 (a) PortOps and associated data inputs, such as PI, were unavailable following the cyber 31 incident, and their full restoration was necessary for calcu...

AI summary The response to Request IR-1 discusses the unavailability of PortOps and related data following a cyber incident, the prioritization of restoring modeling systems, and the anticipated availability of detailed ADC load shifting benefits data for the Q2 2026 FAM Small Working Group meeting.