E-32025 DSM Evaluation Reports
156 passages
Table 8: 2025 Evaluated Net Lifetime Electrical Energy Savings at the Generator DSM Program Program Component Annual Net Electrical Energy Savings (GWh) Lifetime Net Electrical En ergy Savings (GWh) Weighted Average EUL (years) Share of An...
AI summary Table 8 presents the 2025 evaluated net lifetime electrical energy savings at the generator for various DSM programs, including appliance retirement, efficient product rebates, and home energy assessments. The table highlights the contribution of residential and BNI programs to annual and lifetime energy savings, with the residential subtotal contributing 36% of annual and 45% of lifetime savings, and BNI programs contributing 64% of annual and 55% of lifetime savings.
Table 11: Evaluated Net Electrical Energy Savings at the Generator, 2020-2025 Electrical Energy Savings (GWh) Electrical Energy Savings (%) DSM Program Program Component 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Residenti...
AI summary This table presents evaluated net electrical energy savings by program and year from 2020 to 2025, highlighting contributions from residential and BNI (Business, Non-profit, and Institutional) programs. It includes energy savings from initiatives like appliance retirement, efficient product rebates, and home energy assessments, with percentages indicating the share of total savings.
Table 12: Evaluated Net Peak Demand Savings at the Generator, 2020-2025 DSM Peak Demand Savings (MW) Peak Demand Savings (%) Program Program Component 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Residential Residential Appl...
AI summary Table 12 evaluates the net peak demand savings from various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2020 to 2025, highlighting the contributions of residential, BNI, and overall portfolio programs in reducing peak demand in megawatts and percentages.
Table 14: 2025 Recommendations on Residential Program Components No. Recommendation BER – R1 Use the calculated adjustment ratios to track gross electrical energy and peak demand savings moving forward, with the exception of the 0.514 adju...
AI summary This table outlines recommendations for residential program components in 2025, focusing on adjusting ratios for tracking energy and peak demand savings and using updated NTGR values for converting gross savings into net savings for evaluation purposes.
Program Components Bibliographic References Instant Savings Emera Inc., Emera Inc. 2024 Annual Report, p. 32, available at https://s205.q4cdn.com/781121964/files/doc_financials/2024/ar/2024_Emera_Annual_Report.pdf (last accessed August 26,...
AI summary The document references bibliographic materials related to the 'Instant Savings' and 'Affordable Multifamily Housing' program components, including reports, regulations, and studies from organizations such as Emera Inc., Natural Resources Canada, and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.
Table 5: 2025 ARet Evaluation Approach Evaluation Objectives Research Questions Methodology Calculate gross results › Are the data in the tracking sheet complete, accurate, and consistent? › What are the evaluated first-year and lifetime g...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the 2025 ARet Evaluation Approach, focusing on calculating both gross and net results through tracking sheet audits and evaluation calculations. It includes research questions related to data accuracy and energy savings, as well as methodologies involving NTGR results and GHG emission reductions.
3.2.5 Evaluated Gross Savings The gross electrical energy and peak demand savings resulting from the retirement of appliances through ARet are listed in [Table](#page-93-0) 6 below. The line loss factors were updated in 2019 and correspond...
AI summary This section discusses the gross electrical energy and peak demand savings from appliance retirements through ARet. Line loss factors were updated in 2019 and submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. Savings are estimated using specific line loss factors for residential and commercial participants.
Table 12: List of 2025 Rebates by Product Products Offered During Campaigns Rebate Products Offered Year-Round Clothes Washers (qualifying models are on the ENERGY STAR Most Efficient list) $75 Bathroom and Utility Room Fans (no light) (qu...
AI summary Table 12 outlines the 2025 rebate amounts for various energy-efficient products offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes both year-round and time-limited rebates, with additional information on how Instant Savings is promoted through various media and consumer engagement events.
5.3 Participation History In 2025, 113,696 eligible products were rebated in participating stores across Nova Scotia, a total that represents a decrease of 71% compared to 2024. As presented in [Table](#page-103-1) 13 below, sales of ENERG...
AI summary In 2025, rebate participation in Nova Scotia saw a significant decrease in sales of ENERGY STAR certified LED products, attributed to changes in the Instant Savings program following the 2024 'Lights Out' campaign. However, sales of control products, such as timers and thermostats, increased substantially, contributing the majority of energy savings.
Table 13: Number of Rebated Products Rebated Through Instant Savings, 2024–2025 Product Category 2024 2025 Variation ENERGY STAR Certified Non-A-type LED Lamps 78,539 1,651 -98% ENERGY STAR Certified LED Fixtures a 268,740 23,606 -91% Cont...
AI summary Table 13 shows a significant decline in the number of rebated products through the Instant Savings program from 2024 to 2025, with most categories experiencing a decrease of over 90%, except for Controls, which increased by 255%.
Methodology The Evaluator conducted a literature review of technical reference manuals (TRMs), NTG studies and instant rebate program impact evaluation reports across 12 jurisdictions in Canada and the United States for NTGR assumptions of...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed technical reference manuals and NTGR studies from 12 jurisdictions to assess instant rebate program impact. Similar measures like lighting controls and thermostats were grouped based on customer motivation and program influence. Priority was given to instant rebate programs and online marketplaces, as well as participant survey data for NTGR assumptions.
1.1 AMH Description AMH provides affordable housing owners and non-profit organizations, such as rehabilitation or transition houses, with incentives for building-wide energy retrofit projects with the intent of reducing electrical and non...
AI summary AMH provides incentives for energy retrofits in affordable multifamily housing and non-profits, requiring energy audits unless prescriptive measures are used. Funding comes from electricity ratepayers and the Province of Nova Scotia, with updated incentive amounts and energy savings targets for 2025. Two project paths (comprehensive and prescriptive) are outlined, with savings calculated via modeling tools or the 2025 DSM MA.
EPI funding comes from two sources: (1) Electricity ratepayer funding is used for upgrades that reduce electricity consumption; and (2) funding from the Government of Nova Scotia using funds from the Green Fund for upgrades that reduce the...
AI summary EPI funding comes from electricity ratepayers and the Government of Nova Scotia's Green Fund. The report evaluates the electricity ratepayer portion of EPI, which aimed for 13.426 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.581 MW in net peak demand savings by 2025.
11.2.7 Evaluated Gross Savings [Table](#page-195-0) 22 and [Table](#page 1-53) 23 below present the annual gross savings results per product category and dwelling for the main EPI offerings. [Table](#page 1-54) 24 further below presents th...
AI summary The document presents annual gross savings results for EPI offerings, showing total electrical energy and peak demand savings at the generator level. Line loss factors, updated in 2019, were used in the calculations and submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update.
Table 22: Evaluated 2025 EPI Gross Electrical Energy and Peak Demand Savings per Measure - Single-family Homes LED Lamps Product Category 9 W Replacing 29 W 40 W 43 W 60 W 72 W 100 W 150 W Number of Units Number of Units 238 244 7,833 498...
AI summary Table 22 evaluates the 2025 EPI gross electrical energy and peak demand savings per measure for single-family homes, focusing on LED lamps replacing various wattage bulbs. The table provides data on installation rates, energy savings, and adjustment ratios across different wattage categories.
LED Lamps Product Category 18 W Replacing 100 W PAR20 7 W Replacing 50 W PAR38 15 W Replacing 90 W PAR38 15 W Replacing 120 W PAR38 15 W Replacing 150 W Number of Units Number of Units 188 1,710 113 27 382 Installation Rate (%) 94% 94% 94%...
AI summary The document presents a detailed table of energy savings from LED lamp installations, including metrics such as number of units, installation rates, energy savings, and adjustment ratios. The data is categorized by different types of LED lamps and includes interactive effects and line loss factors for each category.
Product Category Faucet Aerators Thermostatic Shower Valves 2.5 gpm Pipe Insulation (per foot) Hot Water Tank Wraps Low-flow Showerheads 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Number of Units Number of Units 1,611 97 3,855...
AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings data for various residential efficiency products, including faucets, shower valves, pipe insulation, and low-flow showerheads. It includes metrics such as installation rates, energy savings, and peak demand reductions, with adjustments for interactive effects and line losses.
Product Category Smart Thermostats for Electric Central Heat Pumps Smart Thermostats for Electric Forced Hot Air Furnaces Smart Thermostats for Electric Baseboards Smart Thermostats for Electric Radiant In-Floor Smart Thermostats for MSHPs...
AI summary The table presents data on the number of units, installation rates, energy savings, and other metrics for various smart thermostat products used in different heating systems in Nova Scotia. It includes details on electrical energy savings, gross lifetime savings, and effective useful life for each product category.
Evaluated 2025 EPI Gross Electrical Energy and Peak Demand Savings per Measure - Single-family Homes (Continued) A ir Sealing Pr oducts – Heat Pump Heatir ng Total for Product Category Foam Gaskets (per pack of 10) Door Sweeps Window Air S...
AI summary This table evaluates the 2025 EPI gross electrical energy and peak demand savings per measure for single-family homes. It includes details such as the number of units installed, unitary savings values, and gross energy savings at the meter and generator. The data highlights the effectiveness of various energy efficiency measures in reducing energy consumption and peak demand.
Table 23: Evaluated 2025 EPI Gross Electrical Energy and Peak Demand Savings per Measure – Apartments LED Lamps Product Category 9 W Replacing 29 W 40 W 43 W 60 W 72 W 100 W 150 W Number of Units Number of Units - - 455 - 1,193 - 4 - Insta...
AI summary Table 23 evaluates the 2025 EPI gross electrical energy and peak demand savings per measure in apartments, focusing on LED lamps. It provides data on unitary energy and peak demand savings, adjustment ratios, and line loss factors for various wattage replacements.
, Air Sealing Products – Hea t Pump Hea ting Product Category Foam Gaskets (per pack of 10) Door Sweeps Window Air Sealing (per 15 ft) Window Film Kits Door Weather Stripping (per 17 ft) Total for Apartments Number of Units Number of Units...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data for various energy efficiency products installed in apartments, including installation rates, energy savings, and peak demand savings. It includes metrics like unitary savings value, adjustment ratios, line loss factors, and effective useful life for each product category.
11.3.2 Participant Spillover For EPI, participant spillover occurs when participants purchase and install additional energy efficient products due to the influence of having participated in the program component without receiving any addit...
AI summary The text discusses participant spillover in the context of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, where participants may install additional energy-efficient products due to program participation. Spillover is assumed to be nil for low-income participants, while non-low-income participants were surveyed in 2024 to assess spillover levels, with results used in the 2025 evaluation.
21.1 MHEEP Description MHEEP provides energy efficiency upgrades to homes in Mi'kmaw communities at no cost to participants or communities. E1 works with community housing managers (HMs), two delivery agents (DAs), and Mi'kmawpreferred con...
AI summary The Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project (MHEEP) delivers free energy upgrades to Mi'kmaw communities in Nova Scotia through E1, community housing managers, delivery agents, and contractors. Funded by DSM and provincial sources, MHEEP aims for 0.548 GWh electrical savings and 0.156 MW peak demand reductions by 2025, including home assessments, insulation, heating upgrades, and moisture management measures.
Table 69: Overall 2025 Existing Residential Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit AMH Electrical Energy Savings 98 Projects 1.378 GWh 1.00 1.378 GWh Li...
AI summary Table 69 outlines the participation levels and savings across various residential programs in 2025, including energy savings, GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life for each program category such as AMH, ASFH, EPI, and Green Heat. The table provides data on gross and net savings, highlighting the impact of these programs on energy efficiency and emissions reduction.
Table 1: 2025 ASFH Corrected Tracked Savings Program Component Result Value Tracked by E1 Corrected Tracked Value Relative Difference Value Unit Value Unit Value ASFH Gross Electrical Energy Savings at the Generator 5.858 GWh 5.785 GWh -1....
AI summary The table presents corrected tracked savings for the 2025 Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, showing a decrease in both gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. The discrepancies between tracked and corrected savings are attributed to E1's outdated calculation methodology, with adjustments made by the Evaluator to correct ratios, line loss factors, and unclaimed savings.
Evaluated 2025 ASFH Allocation of EPI Gross Electrical Energy and Peak Demand Savings per Measure (Continued) Product Category Faucet Aerators Thermostatic Shower Valves 2.5 gpm Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Wraps Low-flow Showerheads 1.0...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2025 allocation of EPI gross electrical energy and peak demand savings per measure for Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH). It includes data on product categories, installation rates, energy savings, and interactive effects factors, providing a detailed breakdown of energy efficiency measures implemented.
APPENDIX XI HEA Reporting Requirements HEA incentives originate from three sources of funding and are thus reported to different parties via the DSM evaluation and government-funded evaluation. The DSM evaluation is focused on reporting el...
AI summary HEA reporting requirements involve incentives funded by both DSM and government programs. The reporting methodology was updated in 2019 and 2024 to reflect changes in energy savings calculations, including the impact of fuel switching and the use of new adjustment ratios. The Canada Greener Homes Grant was incorporated in 2021 without changing the reporting structure.
Table 1: 2025 Reporting Requirements for Different Energy Savings Scenario[s](#page-113-0) 1 Scenarios 1 2 3 4 Change in Overall Electrical Energy Consumption Increase Increase Decrease Decrease Change in Overall Non electrical Energy Cons...
AI summary Table 1 outlines 2025 reporting requirements for various energy savings scenarios, detailing changes in electrical and non-electrical energy consumption, reporting obligations, and equations used to calculate DSM and government-funded savings. The table highlights the rationale for different reporting approaches based on funding sources and energy consumption changes.
Evaluation Approach The 2025 evaluation was focused on calculating both gross and net results for the BER program component, including first-year and lifetime electrical energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided greenhouse gas (GHG)...
AI summary The 2025 evaluation focused on calculating gross and net results for the BER program, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and GHG emissions avoidance, with Table 1 summarizing the evaluation types and methodologies used.
Table 2: Evaluated 2025 BER Program Savings and Participation Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit Application Rebates ' Electrical Energy Savings 143 Projects 9.214 GWh 0.93 8.586 GWh L...
AI summary Table 2 evaluates the 2025 Business Energy Rebates (BER) program's savings and participation. The program exceeded its net electrical energy savings target by 5% but fell short of its peak demand savings target by 26%. Instant Rebates was the largest contributor to the program's overall savings.
Program Measure Date an Early Replacement Baseline Calculation Approach Comes into Effect Date of LED Baseline Expected to Come into Effect for All Projects Fixtures N/A – midstream program June 30, 2026 BER-IR Lamps N/A – midstream progra...
AI summary The table outlines the dates for the implementation of baseline calculation approaches and LED baseline dates for various programs and measures, including midstream programs, Business Energy Rebates, and Small Business Energy Solutions. These dates are relevant for lighting and fixture replacements and are subject to confirmation through a 2026 market study.
Table 3: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated 2025 BER Savings at the Generator Gross Savings Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Unit BER Electrical Energy Savings Tracked Savings by E1 44.659 GWh 0.85 38.065 GWh 106% Evaluation...
AI summary Table 3 compares tracked and evaluated 2025 Business Energy Rebates (BER) savings at the generator level. Tracked savings by E1 and evaluation results are presented for electrical energy and peak demand savings, along with realization rates and net-to-gross ratios.
1.2 Follow-up on Past Evaluation Report Recommendations The Evaluator evaluated BER for 2024 and provided improvement recommendations. [Table](#page-146-1) 5 below outlines the status of those recommendations that were carried forward.
AI summary The Evaluator assessed the Business Energy Rebates (BER) for 2024 and provided improvement recommendations, with Table 5 outlining the status of those recommendations that were carried forward.
Table 5: Implementation Status of Past Recommendations for BER # Recommendation Status Comments 2024-BER-R1 Undertake additional research to further validate market evaluation results to establish, no later than Q3, when the LED baseline f...
AI summary The recommendation for additional research on LED baseline timing for BER-IR has been completed. E1 collaborated with the Evaluator to conduct the research and will present the findings in the 2025 DSM Efficient Product Rebates Evaluation Report to be submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board on March 31, 2026.
Table 6: 2025 BER Evaluation Approach Evaluation Objectives Research Questions Methodology Calculate gross results › Are the data in the tracking sheet complete, accurate, and consistent? › Are the gross savings calculated for a sample of...
AI summary Table 6 outlines the evaluation approach for the 2025 Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It includes objectives such as calculating gross results and research questions related to data accuracy, savings calculations, and interactive effect factors. Methodologies include tracking sheet audits, site visits, and calculations using updated lighting interactive effects methodology.
Table 7: 2025 Application Rebates Adjustment Ratios Electrical Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Measure Category Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Lighting 1.117 8.3% 1.031 10.4% Heating, Ventilation, and...
AI summary Table 7 presents the 2025 Application Rebates Adjustment Ratios for various measure categories, including lighting and HVAC, with specific adjustment ratios and margins of error for electrical energy and peak demand savings.
Table 8: 2025 BER-AR EUL Values Measure Tracked EUL Evaluated EUL LED Linear Fixtures 1 x 4 Luminaires 11.6 4.8 2 x 2 Luminaires and Retrofit Kits 11.6 4.8 2 x 4 Luminaires and Retrofit Kits 11.6 4.8 Linear Ambient and Low-bay Luminaires 1...
AI summary Table 8 presents the 2025 BER-AR EUL values for various LED lighting measures, comparing tracked and evaluated effective useful life (EUL) values. The evaluated EUL values are used to calculate gross and net lifetime electrical energy savings, with weighted average EUL values of 15.8 and 16.0 years respectively.
3.2.4 Evaluated Gross Savings The savings achieved for each Application Rebates measure category are presented in [Table](#page-163-0) 9 below. Both electrical energy and peak demand savings were revised by applying the adjustment ratios d...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of evaluated gross savings for Application Rebates measure categories, including the use of adjustment ratios and line loss factors. It references the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update and mentions the use of line loss factors provided by NS Power.
The differences between tracked and evaluated savings outlined in the figures are the results from applying updated adjustment ratio values across all measure categories and revised interactive effects values for recessed fixture lighting...
AI summary The document discusses differences between tracked and evaluated savings in the 2025 Application Rebates, resulting from updated adjustment ratio values and revised interactive effects for recessed fixture lighting measures. It also references figures and a table related to electrical energy and peak demand savings, as well as GHG emission reductions calculated using a Nova Scotia-specific factor.
Table 10: Evaluated 2025 Application Rebates Gross GHG Emission Reductions Total Gross Electrical Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) 9.214 Nova Scotia-specific GHG Emissions Factor for Electricity Production (tonnes of CO2 eq/GWh) 469...
AI summary Table 10 presents the evaluated gross GHG emission reductions from the 2025 Application Rebates, showing 4,324 tonnes of CO2 eq annually based on 9.214 GWh of electrical energy savings and a Nova Scotia-specific GHG emissions factor of 469.3 tonnes of CO2 eq/GWh.
Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use attributable specifically to Application Rebates. Net savings were estimated by applying the above NTGR values to the evaluated gross electrical energy savings, as illustrated in the fol...
AI summary Net savings from Application Rebates are calculated using NTGR values applied to gross electrical energy savings, resulting in 4,029 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emission reductions.
Table 26: Participating Distributors - Average DLC Shares Stocked Lighting Category % DLC Standard % DLC Premium % NOT DLC Certified Linear fixtures (n=3) 55 43 2 Outdoor fixtures (n=3) 48 50 2 High bay fixtures (n=3) 32 67 2 Lighting dist...
AI summary The table shows the percentage of DLC-certified LED fixtures stocked by lighting distributors. After program rebates, DLC Standard-certified fixtures are typically cheaper than non-DLC products. Some distributors report that most of their inventory is DLC-certified, making price comparisons difficult.
Opinions among distributors were mixed on the topic of DLC Premium and DLC Standard pricing patterns and the impact of rebates on pricing differences between the two categories. For DLC Premium fixtures, some distributors observed that the...
AI summary Distributors have mixed opinions on DLC Premium and DLC Standard pricing patterns and rebate impacts. Some note that DLC Premium prices remain higher than DLC Standard even after rebates, while others express confusion about the certification differences. Non-participating distributors supply DLC-certified fixtures, mostly DLC Standard, with higher proportions in outdoor fixtures.
e based on projects targeted by a given program (e.g. early replacement) and/or an agreed upon date when it is assumed that LED fixtures is the baseline for all project types (even early replacement). The Table 29 below details the baselin...
AI summary The text discusses the baseline approach and Effective Useful Life (EUL) assumptions for LED fixtures across different jurisdictions, noting that no jurisdiction uses a different baseline approach for LED fixtures based on program type.
Program Measure Date an Early Replacement Baseline Calculation Approach Comes into Effect Date of LED Baseline Expected to Come into Effect for All Projects Fixtures N/A – midstream program June 30, 2026 BER-IR Lamps N/A – midstream progra...
AI summary The table outlines the dates for the implementation of baseline calculation approaches and LED baseline dates for various programs and measures, including Fixtures, Lamps, and New Construction. These dates vary by program and are subject to confirmation through a 2026 market study.
CONCLUSION Table 30 below presents the participation levels, net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs), evaluated gross and net savings at the generator, annual GHG emission reductions, as well as effective useful life (EUL) values for each service and...
AI summary Table 30 presents participation levels, net-to-gross ratios, evaluated gross and net savings, annual GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life values for each service and Efficient Product Rebates as a whole.
Table 30: Overall 2025 Efficient Product Rebates Participation and Evaluated Savings Unit Projects Products 9.214 145.644 0.815 4,324 15.8 GWh GWh MW Tonnes of CO2 eq Years 0.93 0.94 0.90 0.93 8.586 137.476 0.737 4,029 GWh GWh MW Tonnes of...
AI summary Table 30 presents data on the participation and evaluated savings from the 2025 Efficient Product Rebates program. It includes metrics such as GWh, MW, Tonnes of CO2 eq, and Years, along with NTGR values indicating the efficiency of the rebates.
D5. [ASK ONLY IF DLC Premium=YES] Without the Business Energy Rebates Program, what is the likelihood that you would have purchased DLC Premium LED lighting products? 1. Definitely would have 2. Probably would have 3. Probably would not ha...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, focusing on customer behavior regarding the purchase of energy-efficient lighting products and the use of energy management services. It explores the impact of the rebate program on purchasing decisions and project implementation.
Table 1: BER-AR Participant Survey Free-ridership Algorithm (Heat Pumps) INTENTION 1 – Heat Pump Cost Score (CS) C3 Context Question C4. Without the Business Energy Rebates Program and the rebate you received, would you have: [ONLY ONE POS...
AI summary This table outlines a free-ridership algorithm used in the BER-AR Participant Survey for heat pumps, focusing on how participants would have acted without the Business Energy Rebates Program. It includes questions about cost scores, timing of purchase, and quantity, with scoring based on responses.
Table 2: BER-AR Participant Survey Free-ridership Algorithm (Lighting) INTENTION D7. [ASK IF D2=1 OR D4=1, 2 OR 3] Without the Business Energy Rebates Program, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed the purchase of the energy...
AI summary This table outlines the free-ridership algorithm used in the BER-AR Participant Survey for the Lighting program, including questions about the likelihood of postponing purchases and scoring methods to assess free-ridership.
B. Lighting Market Assessment - B1. Based on your observations, what's happened in the commercial LED lighting market in the past three years in terms of…? [ASK FOR EACH] - b. New technologies [Any differences between LED lamps and LED fix...
AI summary The document asks about changes in the commercial LED lighting market over the past three years, including technology, demand, product offerings, availability, and pricing. It also requests the proportion of LED versus non-LED lighting stock in 2025 and asks if participation in the Midstream Business Rebate Program affected this percentage.
- C) [IF LESS THAN 100% FOR LED AT B11A)] When do you expect LED products to make up 100% of your [READ CATEGORY NAME] sales? Lighting Estimated Sales (%) in 2027 Lighting Category % LED % Non-LED [Why increase/decrease Year anticipated fo...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document asks respondents to estimate when LED products will make up 100% of sales in various lighting categories and to provide details on the percentage of DLC certified LED fixtures before and after participation in the Midstream Business Rebate Program.
This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2025 BER evaluation. Section Recommendations Executive Summary Recommendation #1: Use the calculated adjustment ratios to track gross electrical energy a...
AI summary The appendix outlines two key recommendations from the 2025 BER evaluation. The first suggests using calculated adjustment ratios to track energy and peak demand savings, with exceptions and reassessments planned for specific measure categories. The second recommends using updated NTGR values to convert gross savings into net savings for reporting purposes.
Retrofit - •Technical and financial support to help organizations conduct scoping and feasibility studies. - •Technical and financial support for the implementation of energy efficiency projects using a customized and flexible approach.\ -...
AI summary The Retrofit program offers technical and financial support for energy efficiency projects, targeting organizations with annual electricity consumption of 350,000 kWh or higher. It emphasizes customized approaches for scoping studies and project implementation, provided projects have not yet commenced.
Table 9: 2025 Retrofit Adjustment Ratios per Project Category Retrofit Project Category Adjustment Ratio on Electrical Energy Savings (Margin of Error) Adjustment Ratio on Peak Demand Savings (Margin of Error) Regular Retrofit 1.003 (±0.4%...
AI summary Table 9 presents the 2025 retrofit adjustment ratios for different project categories, including Regular Retrofit, Solar PV (using PV Watts and RETScreen), and Compressed Air Leak Audit. Adjustment ratios are provided for electrical energy savings and peak demand savings, along with margins of error. Solar PV projects use 2023 adjustment ratios due to completed savings verification.
For multiyear projects that claimed partial savings in previous years and were completed in 2025, the Evaluator applied the 2025 adjustment ratios to the full savings associated with those projects. To compensate for adjustments to partial...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation process for multiyear projects completed in 2025, including the application of adjustment ratios and true-up adjustments. It also notes that solar PV projects did not contribute to peak demand savings during Nova Scotia's peak periods and that compressed air leak audit projects used 2021 adjustment ratios due to completed savings verification.
Table 10: Example of a 2025 True-up Adjustment 2024 2025 Total Tracked Savings (kWh) 105,187 63,884 169,071 Year-specific Adjustment Ratio 1.021 1.003 Revised Savings Prior to True-up (kWh) 107,396 64,076 171,472 Total Project Revised Savi...
AI summary Table 10 shows a 2025 true-up adjustment example, illustrating tracked savings, adjustment ratios, and revised savings. Table 11 builds on this by applying adjustment ratios and true-up adjustments to Retrofit projects' energy and peak demand savings. Line loss factors from NS Power's 2014 study are used for calculations, with assumptions for municipal utilities.
Table 1: Participant Interview Questionnaire and Free-ridership Algorithm Question Answer Score I would like to understand the impact of the financial incentives offered by Reduced the cost of the energy efficiency measures, significantly...
AI summary The table discusses the impact of financial incentives from Efficiency Nova Scotia on energy efficiency measures and decision-making in building projects. Respondents indicate that incentives significantly reduced costs and influenced decisions, with varying levels of confidence in hiring energy modeling consultants without the incentives.
Table 6: 2025 SBES Evaluation Approach Evaluation Objectives Research Questions Methodology Calculate gross results › Are the data in the tracking sheet complete, accurate, and consistent? › What are the average interactive effect factors,...
AI summary Table 6 outlines the 2025 SBES Evaluation Approach, focusing on calculating gross and net results through tracking sheet audits, adjustment ratios, and GHG emission reduction calculations. It addresses research questions related to data accuracy, interactive effects, and the application of baseline methodologies.
Table 16: Overall 2025 Direct Installation Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit SBES Electrical Energy Savings 62,011 Units 9.774 GWh 0.80 7.862 GWh L...
AI summary Table 16 presents the 2025 Direct Installation participation and evaluated savings under the SBES program. The program fell significantly short of its energy savings and peak demand targets, with a 38% shortfall in net electrical energy savings and a 46% shortfall in net peak demand savings.
1.1 Residential DR Description In 2023, E1 officially launched Residential DR. Since the fall of 2020, E1 has implemented several initiatives focused on reducing demand during the Nova Scotia peak period. The Residential DR program compone...
AI summary The Residential Demand Response (DR) program in Nova Scotia, launched by E1 in 2023, offers four pathways for participants to reduce demand during peak periods. Eligibility criteria, incentives, and technical implementation details are outlined, including the role of EPI, Virtual Peaker, and Shifted Energy in program execution.
Table 11: DR Program Enrollment Pathways by Jurisdiction Program Administrator Is there a Complimentary Energy Efficiency Program Associated with DR? DR Enrollment Pathway via Energy Efficiency Program? Efficiency Nova Scotia √ (EPI: Free...
AI summary Table 11 outlines Demand Response (DR) program enrollment pathways by jurisdiction, including whether a complimentary energy efficiency program is associated with DR and the enrollment process. Efficiency Nova Scotia, BC Hydro, IESO, National Grid, PSE, and Rhode Island Energy are highlighted with their respective DR and energy efficiency program details.
Table 14: Home Battery Incentive Structures and Levels per Jurisdiction Program Administratora Enrollment Incentive Participation Incentive Efficiency Nova Scotia $500/household $300/average kW across all events BC Hydro $500/household $25...
AI summary Table 14 outlines home battery incentive structures and levels per jurisdiction, showing variations in enrollment and participation incentives across different program administrators in Canada and the US. The table highlights the differences in financial support provided by entities such as Efficiency Nova Scotia, BC Hydro, and others.
Table 15: Hot Water Controllers Incentive Structures and Levels per Jurisdiction Program Administratora Enrollment Incentive Participation Incentive Other Efficiency Nova Scotia - $20/device/year - BC Hydro $100/household $50/household/yea...
AI summary Table 15 compares hot water controller incentive structures across various jurisdictions, including enrollment and participation incentives, as well as additional benefits like discounted rates and gift cards.
Table 11: LED Fixture with Motion Sensor Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure LED fixtures with motion sensors rebated in store - Baseline Standard-compliant new fixtures Genera...
AI summary Table 11 outlines the energy savings parameters for LED fixtures with motion sensors under the Instant Savings program, including unitary energy savings, peak demand savings, and interactive effects factors. The table provides details on installation rates, useful life, and calculations related to energy and demand savings.
Table 22: Solar Fixture Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings EPI Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure LED solar fixtures rebar Savings) or with direct i - Baseline LED fixtures connected to the grid Non-LED fixture...
AI summary Table 22 presents a comparison between the Instant Savings and EPI programs for LED solar fixtures, including parameters such as installation rates, useful life, energy savings, and peak demand savings. The table highlights differences in performance metrics and references specific subsections for detailed calculations.
Table 61: Wood and Pellet Boiler and Furnace Measure Summary Parameter Green Heat HEA Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure purchase (Green Heat) Wood and pellet boilers and furnaces rebated after installation (HEA) or r...
AI summary Table 61 provides a summary of the Wood and Pellet Boiler and Furnace Measure under the Green Heat program. It outlines parameters such as installation rates, effective useful life, energy savings, and peak demand savings for various heating systems, including electrical heating, heat pumps, and HEA (Home Energy Assessment).
Table 72: Non-learning Smart Thermostat for Electrical Heating System Measure Summary Parameter ASFH, Instant Savings EPI Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Non-learning smart thermostats with programmable schedules t...
AI summary Table 72 provides a summary of the Non-learning Smart Thermostat for Electrical Heating System Measure, including parameters such as installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings. It outlines energy savings for different heating systems and subcategories, such as single-family homes and apartments.
Table 80: Clothesline and Outdoor Drying Rack Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Clotheslines and outdoor drying racks rebated in store - Baseline Clothes being dr...
AI summary Table 80 provides a summary of the Clothesline and Outdoor Drying Rack Measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings. The measure involves rebating clotheslines and outdoor drying racks in store, with a baseline of clothes being dried using a clothes dryer.
148 Ad Hoc Recherche, Rapport d'évaluation, Programme : Produits Mieux Consommer – Électroménagers Energy Star (Années 2008 et 2009) , p. 18. 149 The proportions of electric water heating published by NRCan are not consistent and significa...
AI summary The text discusses the use of data from the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program to determine the proportion of electric water heating, noting inconsistencies in data from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and the changes in the EPI program in 2021 that affected data accuracy.
Table 107: ENERGY STAR Certified Room Air Purifier Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers rebated in store - Baseline New Non-ENERGY STAR...
AI summary This table provides a summary of the ENERGY STAR certified room air purifier measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, unitary energy savings, and peak demand savings. The measure involves rebating ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers in store.
The electrical unitary energy savings value is determined by using the following equation for ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers. $$\begin{split} Energy \, Savings \, \left[ \frac{kWh}{year} \right] \\ &= \left[ CADR[cfm] \times \lef...
AI summary The text provides a formula for calculating the energy savings of ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers, using parameters such as CADR, EF, SBP, and HOU. It references data from the 10 most sold models under the Instant Savings program and the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances due to the absence of Canadian minimum requirements for room air purifiers.
Table 120: Smart Power Controllers for Audiovisual Equipment Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Smart power controllers for audiovisual equipment rebated in store - Baseline N...
AI summary Table 120 provides a summary of a measure involving smart power controllers for audiovisual equipment. It outlines parameters such as installation rate, useful life, and energy savings. The measure is categorized as Tier 1 power strip, and the baseline is non-smart power controllers.
[Table](#page-93-1) 121 presents the annual unitary savings values for EPI and for Instant Savings and the source of those values. Table 121: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Smart Power Controller Audiovisual Equipment Parameter Inst...
AI summary Table 121 presents annual unitary energy savings values for EPI and Instant Savings, with the source cited as NMR Group, 2019166. The table includes parameters such as unitary energy savings in kWh/year for audiovisual equipment.
Table 122: Power Bar with Integrated Timer Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identificatio n Measure Description Power bars with integrated timer rebated in store - Baseline Power bars without an i...
AI summary Table 122 provides a summary of the Power Bar with Integrated Timer Measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings. The measure involves rebating power bars with integrated timers, and the table outlines baseline assumptions and savings calculations.
Table 126: ENERGY STAR Certified Pool Pump Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description ENERGY STAR certified pool pumps rebated in store - Baseline Standard efficiency elec...
AI summary This table summarizes the ENERGY STAR certified pool pump measure, including details on energy savings, installation rates, and life expectancy. The measure involves rebating energy-efficient pool pumps and outlines parameters such as unitary energy savings and peak demand-to-energy ratios.
Table 129: Electric Thermal Storage Measure Summary Parameter Green Heat Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Electric thermal storage systems rebated after purchase - Baseline Heating systems without electr...
AI summary This table provides a summary of the Electric Thermal Storage Measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings. It outlines the baseline heating systems and the measure description, focusing on rebates for electric thermal storage systems.
Table 139: Solar Photovoltaic System Measure Summary Parameter HEA Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Solar PV systems of a maximum of 100 kW, rebated after installation - Baseline No solar PV systems General Paramete...
AI summary Table 139 outlines the parameters for Solar Photovoltaic (PV) systems, including installation rates, useful life, and energy savings calculations. The table provides details on the baseline, measure description, and various technical parameters related to electrical savings and demand.
Table 142: EUL Values and Sources for Non-LED Lighting Residential Measures Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Reference Appliances Clotheslines and Outdoor Drying Racks Instant Savings 10 IESO Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions (...
AI summary Table 142 lists effective useful life (EUL) values and sources for non-LED lighting residential measures, including appliance retirements and drying racks. Values are derived from various references such as the IESO Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List and the ENERGY STAR Calculator.
Table 143: Commercial Measure Assessment Change Log Change Type Section Description Date Update 1.1.1(2) Advanced RTU Controls Update savings calculation methodology 2023-03-09 Update 3.1 EUL - LED Lamps and Fixtures Update EUL values and...
AI summary This table documents changes to the Commercial Measure Assessment, including updates to savings calculation methodologies, new measures such as compressed air leak repairs and variable frequency drives, and the removal of the booster pump from BER Instant Rebates. It also outlines the creation of separate residential and commercial reports and the addition of LED roadway lighting and smart thermostats for electric heating.
Table 151: LED Lamp Measure Summary Parameter SBES SBES CDI Pilot Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description LED lamps installed with direct installation - Baseline Existing lighting being replaced Measure Subcate...
AI summary Table 151 provides a summary of LED lamp measures, including parameters such as installation rates, energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and unitary energy savings. It outlines differences between the SBES and SBES CDI Pilot programs, as well as reference details for calculations.
Table 154: Linear LED Fixture Measure Summary Parameter BER-IR BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Linear LED fixtures (Luminaires, Retrofit Kits, Linear Ambient and Low bay Luminaires), rebated in store Li...
AI summary Table 154 provides a summary of linear LED fixture measures, including descriptions, baseline comparisons, and energy savings adjustment ratios. It outlines parameters such as energy savings, peak demand savings, and interactive effects factors for different types of fixtures.
Table 155: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Linear LED Fixtures Parameter Symbol Value for BER-IR Value for BER AR and SBES Reference Baseline Wattage [W] 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 Fixed baseline based on fixture type and lumen output A...
AI summary Table 155 outlines the parameters used to calculate electrical unitary energy savings for linear LED fixtures, including baseline wattage, new wattage, and hours of operation. The table references Table 156 for baseline wattage values based on lumens output for T8 fluorescent luminaires.
Table 157: Linear LED Lamp Measure Summary Parameter BER-IR BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Linear LED lamps, rebated in store Linear LED lamps, rebated after installation See Table 274 for BER-IR basel...
AI summary Table 157 provides a summary of linear LED lamp measures, including baseline parameters, energy savings adjustment ratios, and interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings. It outlines the differences between BER-IR, BER-AR, and SBES measures.
Table 158: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Linear LED Lamps Parameter Symbol Value for BER-IR Value for BER- AR and SBES Reference Baseline Wattage [W] Baseline Wattage Based on fixture type and lumen output Actual Based on sp...
AI summary The table outlines the electrical unitary energy savings values for linear LED lamps, including baseline wattage, new wattage, ballast factor, and hours of operation. It references the Duke Energy Fixture Wattage Table for baseline wattage calculations and provides specific values for different subcategories of LED lamps.
Table 160: Outdoor LED Fixture Measure Summary Parameter BER-IR BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Outdoor LED fixtures, rebated in store Outdoor LED fixtures, rebated after installation See Table 162 and...
AI summary Table 160 provides a summary of the Outdoor LED Fixture Measure under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It outlines parameters such as baseline lighting types, energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings ratios, and other technical details for both BER-IR and BER-AR programs, referencing specific subsections and studies for further information.
Table 161: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Outdoor LED Fixtures Parameter Symbol Value for BER-IR Value for BER- AR and SBES Reference Baseline Wattage [W] Baseline Wattage Based on fixture type and lumen output Actual IR: See...
AI summary Table 161 outlines the electrical unitary energy savings values for outdoor LED fixtures, including baseline wattage, new wattage, and hours of operation. The table provides different values for BER-IR, BER-AR, and SBES, with references to other tables and specification data for calculations.
Both subcategories are divided into groups by lumens output to assign the correct baseline wattages, and the baseline technology used for each subcategory differs. Weighted averages of 50% MH and 50% HPS fixture system wattages are used to...
AI summary The text discusses the categorization of outdoor wall-mounted area luminaires based on lumens output to determine baseline wattages. It mentions the use of weighted averages of 50% metal halide (MH) and 50% high-pressure sodium (HPS) fixture system wattages for different types of luminaires, as detailed in Table 162.
Lumens Range MH Baseline Fixture Wattage (W) HPS Baseline Fixture Wattage (W) Weighted Average Baseline Wattage (W) ≥ 300 and < 2,000 43 46 44.5 ≥ 2,000 and < 5,000 95 95 95.0 ≥ 5,000 and < 15,000 295 250 272.5 ≥ 15,000 and < 25,000 458 46...
AI summary The text presents tables comparing baseline wattages for different lumens ranges of metal halide (MH) and high-pressure sodium (HPS) fixtures, used for calculating energy savings in the Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates (BER-IR) program. These tables help in selecting efficient LED fixtures based on required light output.
Table 164: Directional and Architectural LED Fixture Measure Summary Parameter BER-IR BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identific cation Measure Directional and architectural LED fixtures, rebated in store Directional and archi...
AI summary Table 164 provides a summary of energy savings parameters for directional and architectural LED fixture measures under different rebate programs, including baseline fixtures, energy savings adjustment ratios, and other technical details related to energy efficiency.
Table 165: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Directional and Architectural LED Fixtures Parameter Symbol Value for BER-IR Value for BER AR and SBES Reference Baseline Wattage [W] 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 Based on fixture type and lumen...
AI summary Table 165 outlines the electrical unitary energy savings values for directional and architectural LED fixtures under different rebate programs. It provides parameters such as baseline wattage, new wattage, and hours of operation, with specific values for BER-IR, BER-AR, and SBES programs.
Table 166: Directional and Architectural LED Fixture Baseline Wattages for BER-IR Category Lumens Baseline Wattage (W) Track or Mono-point Directional Luminaires ≥ 250 60.4 Wall-wash Luminaires 517 - 1199 50.0 ≥ 1,200 100 In-service Rate
AI summary Table 166 outlines baseline wattages for directional and architectural LED fixtures under the Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates (BER-IR) program. The table includes categories such as Track or Mono-point Directional Luminaires and Wall-wash Luminaires, along with their respective lumens and baseline wattage values.
Table 167: Occupancy/Motion Sensor Measure Summary Parameter BER-IR BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Occupancy/Motion sensors, rebated in store Occupancy/Motion sensors, rebated after installation - Base...
AI summary Table 167 provides a summary of occupancy/motion sensor measures and their associated energy savings parameters, including adjustment ratios, effective useful life, and unitary energy savings for different rebate programs such as BER-IR, BER-AR, and SBES.
Table 168: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Occupancy/Motion Sensors Parameter Type of Occupancy Sensor Value for BER-IR Value for BER AR and SBES Reference Connected Wattage (W) Interior 110 Actual Average connected wattage fo...
AI summary Table 168 provides electrical unitary energy savings values for occupancy/motion sensors based on data from 2021 to 2023, including connected wattage, savings factors, and hours of operation. The values are derived from Efficiency Vermont TRM and program data, with specific exceptions for exterior sensors.
Table 172: LED Roadway Lighting Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure LED, DLC Premium qualified roadways lighting with a minimum efficacy of 150 lm/W, with advanced dimming based o...
AI summary Table 172 outlines the LED roadway lighting measure summary, including details such as the measure description, baseline, installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. It specifies that the measure involves LED, DLC Premium qualified roadway lighting with a minimum efficacy of 150 lm/W, and provides calculations for energy savings and peak demand savings.
Table 176: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Horticultural Lighting BER-AR SBES Parameter Symbol Retrofit Retrofit New Construction Reference Peak Coincidence Factor [-] PCF Actual Actual Use information in TS Energy Savings Interacti...
AI summary Table 176 presents unitary peak demand savings values for horticultural lighting, including parameters such as peak coincidence factor, energy savings interactive effects factor, and conversion factor. The table outlines calculation methods for retrofit and new construction scenarios based on project data and technical references.
Table 177: Pump Gross Savings Adjustment Ratios Source Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Program Component Evaluation Report Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error BER-AR 2025 0.951 5.8% 0.514 21.9% 6.2.4 Pump M...
AI summary Table 177 presents Pump Gross Savings Adjustment Ratios for the BER-AR program component in 2025, showing an energy savings adjustment ratio of 0.951 with a 5.8% margin of error and a peak demand savings adjustment ratio of 0.514 with a 21.9% margin of error. Section 6.2.4 discusses Pump Measures.
Table 178: Circulator Pump Measure Summary Parameter BER-IR, BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Variable speed electronically commutated motor (ECM) circulator pumps, rebated in store - Baseline Single-sp...
AI summary Table 178 provides a summary of circulator pump measures, including details on energy savings, peak demand savings, and installation rates for different rebate programs. It outlines parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratios, effective useful life, and unitary energy savings for various pump categories.
Table 180: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Circulator Pumps BER-IR Parameters Max Input Power < 144 W Max Input Power ≥ 144 W and < 575 W Max Input Power ≥ 575 W and < 2,500 W Reference Average Demand Savings [kW] 0.0675 0.0953 0.12...
AI summary Table 180 presents unitary peak demand savings values for circulator pumps based on different input power ranges, with reference to the 2023 Vermont TRM. The table includes average demand savings, peak coincidence factor, and calculated unitary peak demand savings.
Table 182: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Booster Pumps Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Rated Horsepower of the New Booster Pump or Pumping System [HP] 𝐻𝑃𝑒𝑒 Specification data for each system Tracking sheet Reduction...
AI summary Table 182 provides electrical unitary energy savings values for booster pumps, including parameters like rated horsepower, energy savings per horsepower, and annual energy savings calculations. It references the 2024 Hawaii TRM199 and mentions calculation methods based on specification data.
6.3.3 Adjustment Ratios The adjustment ratios in [Table](#page-152-2) 184 were established through the latest comprehensive impact evaluation for each program. They should be applied for all HVAC measures in SBES and BER-AR.
AI summary Adjustment ratios in Table 184 were established through the latest comprehensive impact evaluation for each program and should be applied to all HVAC measures in SBES and BER-AR.
Table 184: HVAC Gross Savings Adjustment Ratios Source Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Program Component Evaluation Report Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error BER-AR 2025 1.006 3.3% 1.027 8.5% SBES 2023 0.9...
AI summary Table 184 presents HVAC Gross Savings Adjustment Ratios for the BER-AR and SBES programs, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and their respective margins of error. Section 6.3.4 discusses HVAC measures in detail.
Table 185: Electric Thermal Storage Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure load, rebated after installation Electric thermal storage systems to reduce peak demand space heating - Base...
AI summary Table 185 outlines the Electric Thermal Storage Measure Summary, detailing parameters for BER-AR and SBES, including installation rates, energy savings adjustment ratios, and effective useful life. It also references subsections in the Technical Reference Manual for additional details on energy and peak demand savings.
Table 186: Advanced RTU Control Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Advanced RTU controls that include demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) and an optional variable frequency drive (VFD)...
AI summary Table 186 provides a summary of the Advanced RTU Control Measure, including details on energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and other parameters related to the Business Energy Rebates – After Installation program. The table outlines technical specifications and references for calculations.
Table 187: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Advanced RTU Controls Parameter Symbol BER-AR Reference Indicator of Cooling in the RTU AC RTU with AC: 1 RTU without AC: 0 - Indicator of Electrical Heating in the RTU ElecHeat RTU w...
AI summary Table 187 presents electrical unitary energy savings values for advanced RTU controls, including parameters such as cooling indicators, COP, and energy savings factors. The table references specification data and external sources like the 2021 Illinois TRM and evaluations from 2016.
Table 189: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Advanced RTU Controls Parameter Symbol BER-AR Reference Demand Savings Factor [kW/hp] 𝐷𝑆𝑉𝐺 0.252 2025 Massachusetts Peak Coincidence Factor [-] 𝑃𝐶𝐹 1.0 TRM211 Conversion Factor [W/kW] - 1,0...
AI summary Table 189 presents unitary peak demand savings values for advanced RTU controls, including parameters such as demand savings factor, peak coincidence factor, and conversion factor. The table references a 2025 Massachusetts Technical Reference Manual and includes a calculation method for unitary peak demand savings based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 190: Smart Thermostat for Electric Heating Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, BER-IR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Smart thermostats for electric baseboards, in floor radiant heating, and heat pumps, r...
AI summary This table outlines the Smart Thermostat for Electric Heating Measure Summary, detailing parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and unitary energy savings for various heating systems.
Table 201: Dual Enthalpy Economizer Control Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Dual enthalpy economizer controls which must be installed on new equipment that is also eligible for...
AI summary Table 201 outlines the Dual Enthalpy Economizer Control Measure, including parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and effective useful life. The table provides details on how energy and peak demand savings are calculated based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 202: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Savings Factor [kBtu/tonne] SF SF (<4.5 tonnes) = 4,576 SF (>4.5 tonnes) = 3,318 Vermont TRM, 2015226 Annual kWh sav...
AI summary Table 202 provides electrical unitary savings values for dual enthalpy economizer controls, including parameters such as savings factor, tonnage of cooling equipment, operational testing factor, energy efficiency ratio, and unitary energy savings. These values are based on simulation modelling and reference data from Vermont TRM.
Table 209: Interactive Effects Factors for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Space Heating Energy Interactive Effects During Heating Period Energy Interactive Effects During Cooling Period Total Energy Interactive Effects Peak Deman...
AI summary The table presents interactive effects factors for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps on energy use and peak demand under different heating scenarios. It shows significant energy savings during heating periods with heat pump and electrical heating, but no effect during cooling periods. The data is sourced from an evaluation report and energy efficiency regulations.
Table 250: Solar PV Measure Summary Parameter Custom Retrofit, BER-AR Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Solar PV systems for commercial, industrial, and agricultural facilities rebated after installation - Baseline F...
AI summary Table 250 outlines the Solar PV Measure Summary, focusing on the installation and energy savings parameters for solar PV systems in commercial, industrial, and agricultural facilities. The table includes details such as installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings calculations.
Table 252: Solar Domestic Hot Water Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure CSA approved Solar domestic hot water heating rebated after installation - Baseline Existing conventional e...
AI summary Table 252 outlines the Solar Domestic Hot Water Measure, including parameters such as the installation rate, energy savings adjustment ratio, and useful life. The measure involves rebating CSA-approved solar domestic hot water heating systems after installation, with energy savings calculated using RETScreen.
Table 255: Cooler Night Cover and Display Strip Curtain Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Night cover or strip curtain for refrigerated cases, rebated after installation - Basel...
AI summary Table 255 presents a summary of the Cooler Night Cover and Display Strip Curtain Measure, including parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and effective useful life. It outlines details related to installation rates and energy savings calculations.
Table 258: Zero-energy Door Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Zero-energy doors, without electric resistance heating in the door or frame, for Reach-in Coolers. Reach-in display...
AI summary Table 258 outlines the parameters for the Zero-energy Door Measure, including energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings, and other technical specifications. The table provides details on installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings calculations for rebate-eligible units.
6.10.3 Adjustment Ratios The adjustment ratios in [Table](#page-31-0) 287 were established as part of the 2025 BER-AR evaluation. They should be applied to all agricultural measures in BER-AR. No adjustment ratios were calculated for SBES.
AI summary The adjustment ratios in Table 287 were established as part of the 2025 BER-AR evaluation and should be applied to all agricultural measures in BER-AR. No adjustment ratios were calculated for SBES.
Table 288: Energy Efficient Ventilation and Circulation Fan Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Ventilation Fan: BESS or AMCA listed rated High Efficiency Ventilation Fan (Exhaust...
AI summary Table 288 outlines the Energy Efficient Ventilation and Circulation Fan Measure Summary, including details on rebate criteria, energy savings adjustment ratios, and other parameters for the BER-AR and SBES programs. It specifies minimum efficiency requirements for rebated fans and provides calculation methods for energy and peak demand savings.
Table 289: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Energy Efficient Ventilation and Circulation Fans BER-AR, SBES Parameter Symbol Ventilation Fan Circulation Fan Reference Airflow Produced by Baseline Fan [CFM] AFb Actual or assume s...
AI summary Table 289 provides electrical unitary energy savings values for energy-efficient ventilation and circulation fans, including parameters such as airflow, efficacy ratios, and hours of use. The table references data from the Technical Reference Manual (TRM) and the Independent Electrical System Operator (IESO) Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List from 2024.
Table 291: Dual and Natural Ventilation Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Both natural and dual ventilation systems that meet the following criteria are eligible, rebated after i...
AI summary This table outlines the eligibility criteria, baseline conditions, and energy savings parameters for natural and dual ventilation systems under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It includes adjustment ratios, effective useful life, and calculation methods for energy and peak demand savings.
Table 294: Zero-energy and Low-energy Livestock Waterer Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Must contain a minimum of 2 inches insulation and an adjustable thermostat and be CSA /...
AI summary Table 294 outlines the parameters for the Zero-energy and Low-energy Livestock Waterer Measure, including requirements for insulation, thermostat, and CSA/cUL ratings, along with energy savings adjustment ratios and other technical details for the BER-AR and SBES measures.
Table 295: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Zero-energy and Low-energy Livestock Waterers Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Wattage of the Heater in the Old Waterer Pb Actual or 800 Use information in TS Default: IESO Pre...
AI summary Table 295 outlines parameters for calculating electrical unitary energy savings for zero-energy and low-energy livestock waterers, including wattage of heaters in old and new waterers, quantity, hours of use, and unitary energy savings. The table provides default values and references for data collection and calculation methods.
Table 297: Agriculture Heat Pad Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure CSA / cUL rated agricultural heat pad, rebated after installation - Baseline Incandescent heat lamps - General P...
AI summary Table 297 outlines the parameters for the BER-AR and SBES measures related to agricultural heat pads, including baseline technologies, energy savings adjustment ratios, and other technical details. The table references various subsections in the document for further details on calculations and assumptions.
Table 298: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Agriculture Heat Pads Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Wattage of Inefficient Heat Lamps Pb Actual or 175 Use information in TS Default: IESO Prescriptive Measures and Assumpti...
AI summary Table 298 provides electrical unitary energy savings values for agriculture heat pads, detailing parameters such as wattage, baseline and efficient quantities, hours of use, and energy savings calculations. These values are used to calculate peak demand savings for rebated units.
Table 302: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Tractor Engine Block Heater Timers Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Peak Coincidence Factor PCF 0.84 As per Subsection 6.10.2 Unitary Peak Demand Savings [kW] ∆𝑘𝑊 Calculation based o...
AI summary Table 302 provides unitary peak demand savings values for tractor engine block heater timers, focusing on the peak coincidence factor (PCF) and unitary peak demand savings (∆𝑘𝑊) based on specification data for each rebated unit. The table references Subsection 6.10.2 for the peak coincidence factor calculation.
Table 307: Heat Reclaimer Unit Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Heat reclaimer unit that electrically heats water, rebated after installation - Baseline No heat reclaimer - Gene...
AI summary Table 307 provides a summary of the Heat Reclaimer Unit Measure, including parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and effective useful life. The table outlines specific values for BER-AR and SBES, with references to subsections in the document for further details.
Table 313: VFD for Milk Vacuum Pump Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure VFD for milk vacuum pump which must milk at least 50 cows, rebated after installation - Baseline No existing...
AI summary Table 313 outlines the VFD for Milk Vacuum Pump Measure Summary, including parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and useful life. It provides details on installation rates, energy savings calculations, and references to subsections for further information.
Table 316: VFD Milk Transfer Pump Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure VFD for milk transfer pump with pre cooler installed which must milk at least 75 cows, rebated after installat...
AI summary Table 316 provides a summary of the VFD Milk Transfer Pump Measure, including details on baseline conditions, energy savings adjustment ratios, peak demand savings adjustment ratios, and other parameters related to the measure's implementation and performance.
Table 317: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for VFD Milk Transfer Pumps Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Energy Factor - Estimate of Energy Offset by Using VFD Milk Transfer Pump per Cow Milked EF 33.945 Massachusetts Farm E...
AI summary Table 317 outlines the electrical unitary energy savings values for VFD milk transfer pumps, including parameters such as the energy factor, average number of cows milked per day, and unitary energy savings. The table references data from the Massachusetts Farm Energy Program and provides a basis for calculating peak demand savings using additional variables from Table 318.
Table 319: Commercial Kitchen Gross Savings Adjustment Ratios Source Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Program Component Evaluation Report Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error BER-AR 2025 0.951 5.8% 0.514 21.9...
AI summary Table 319 presents the Commercial Kitchen Gross Savings Adjustment Ratios for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including energy savings and peak demand savings with their respective adjustment ratios and margins of error. Section 6.11.4 discusses commercial kitchen measures.
Table 320: Dishwasher Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Low or high temperature ENERGY STAR® rated dishwasher, rebated after installation - Baseline Standard dishwasher - General...
AI summary Table 320 provides a summary of the dishwasher measure under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It outlines parameters such as installation rates, energy savings adjustment ratios, and effective useful life for different dishwasher types. The table references various subsections in the technical reference manuals for detailed calculations.
Table 322: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Dishwashers Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Peak Coincidence Factor PCF Actual or 0.68 As per Subsection 6.11.2 Unitary Peak Demand Savings [kW] 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠𝑘𝑊 Calculation ba...
AI summary The table outlines the unitary peak demand savings values for dishwashers under the Business Energy Rebates program. It includes parameters such as the peak coincidence factor and the calculation method for peak demand savings based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 323: Freezer/Refrigerator Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure ENERGY STAR® rated rebated after installation standalone refrigerator or freezer, - Baseline Standard refrigerat...
AI summary Table 323 provides a summary of energy savings measures for freezer and refrigerator programs, specifically focusing on the Business Energy Rebates (BER-AR) and the Standard Baseline Equipment (SBES). It includes parameters like installation rates, energy savings adjustment ratios, and useful life.
Table 326: Fryer Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure ENERGY STAR® rated fryer, rebated after installation - Baseline Standard electric fryer - General Parameters Installation Rate...
AI summary Table 326 details the Fryer Measure Summary, focusing on the ENERGY STAR® rated fryer rebated after installation. It outlines parameters such as energy savings adjustment ratio, peak demand savings adjustment ratio, and effective useful life, referencing specific subsections for calculations and data.
Table 327: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Fryers Parameter Symbol BER-AR R, SBES Reference Annual Days of Operation [days/year] DAYS Actual Measure specific - use information in TS Average Daily Operation [hours/day] HOU Actu...
AI summary Table 327 outlines parameters for calculating electrical unitary energy savings values for fryers, including operational days, fryer size, and energy efficiency. Energy savings are calculated using the ENERGY STAR Commercial Food Services Calculator, with reference to other tables for additional variables.
Table 331: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Griddles Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Peak Coincidence Factor PCF Actual or 0.68 As per Subsection 6.11.2 Unitary Peak Demand Savings [kW] 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠𝑘𝑊 Calculation based...
AI summary Table 331 presents unitary peak demand savings values for griddles, focusing on parameters such as the peak coincidence factor (PCF) and the calculation of peak demand savings in kilowatts (kW) based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 332: Hot Food Holding Cabinet Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure cabinet, rebated after installation ENERGY STAR® rated hot food holding - Baseline Standard hot food holding...
AI summary Table 332 summarizes the Hot Food Holding Cabinet Measure, including parameters such as installation rates, energy savings adjustment ratios, and peak demand savings adjustment ratios. It outlines details for the Business Energy Rebates (BER-AR) and Standard Building Energy Standards (SBES).
Table 336: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Ice Machines Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Annual Days of Operation [days/year] DAYS Actual Measure specific - use information in TS Average Daily Operation [hours/day] HOU...
AI summary Table 336 outlines parameters for calculating electrical unitary energy savings values for ice machines, including operational days, hours, equipment categories, ice type, harvest rate, and energy use. Energy savings are calculated using the ENERGY STAR Commercial Food Services Calculator.
Table 337: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Ice Machines Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Peak Coincidence Factor PCF Actual or 0.68 As per Subsection 6.11.2 Unitary Peak Demand Savings [kW] 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠𝑘𝑊 Calculation b...
AI summary Table 337 presents unitary peak demand savings values for ice machines, including parameters such as the peak coincidence factor and unitary peak demand savings. The table references Subsection 6.11.2 and provides calculation details based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 339: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Ovens Parameter Symbol BER-AR R, SBES Reference Annual Days of Operation [days/year] DAYS Actual Measure specific - use information in TS Average Daily Operation [hours/day] HOU Actua...
AI summary Table 339 outlines the parameters and reference sources for calculating electrical unitary energy savings values for ovens, including operational days, size, cooking efficiency, and energy savings. It references the ENERGY STAR Commercial Food Services Calculator for calculations.
Table 340: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Ovens Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Peak Coincidence Factor PCF Actual or 0.68 As per Subsection 6.11.2 Unitary Peak Demand Savings [kW] 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠𝑘𝑊 Calculation based on...
AI summary Table 340 outlines unitary peak demand savings values for ovens, focusing on parameters like the peak coincidence factor (PCF) and calculation methods for peak demand savings. The table references Subsection 6.11.2 and provides context for how savings are calculated based on rebated unit specifications.
Table 341: Steam Cooker Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure ENERGY STAR® rated steam cooker, rebated after installation - Baseline Standard steam cooker - General Parameters Instal...
AI summary Table 341 summarizes the Steam Cooker Measure, including details such as the measure description, baseline, installation rate, energy savings adjustment ratio, peak demand savings adjustment ratio, and other parameters related to energy and peak demand savings. It references various subsections for additional details.
Table 344: Demand Controlled Kitchen Exhaust Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Controlled by temperature and/or optical sensors located in exhaust hood, rebated after installatio...
AI summary Table 344 provides a summary of the Demand Controlled Kitchen Exhaust Measure under the Business Energy Rebates - Advanced Rebates (BER-AR) and Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) programs. It outlines parameters such as measure description, baseline, installation rate, energy savings adjustment ratios, and other technical details.
Table 348: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Commercial Washing Machines Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Modified Energy Factor of Baseline Equipment [ft3/kWh/load] MEFb Actual or 1.26 Use information in TS Default: Cana...
AI summary Table 348 outlines parameters and values for calculating electrical unitary energy savings for commercial washing machines, including modified energy factors, equipment capacity, number of loads, and quantity of machines. These values are used in conjunction with Table 349 to calculate peak demand savings.
Table 350: Commercial Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Commercial heat pump clothes dryer meeting a minimum Combined Energy Factor (CEF) of 4.5, rebated...
AI summary Table 350 outlines the Commercial Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Measure Summary, including details such as the measure description, baseline, installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. The measure involves rebating commercial heat pump clothes dryers meeting specific energy efficiency standards.
Table 351: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Commercial Heat Pump Clothes Dryers Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Quantity QTY Actual Use information in TS Loads per Year [loads/year] Cdry Multi-unit Residential 1,083 Lau...
AI summary Table 351 presents energy savings values for commercial heat pump clothes dryers, including parameters like loads per year, average load, and energy efficiency factors. The table references data from the U.S. Department of Energy and Vermont TRM for baseline and efficient equipment calculations.
Table 352: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Commercial Heat Pump Clothes Dryers Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Time Cycle [h] timecycle Actual or 1 Use information in TS Default: Vermont 2015 TRM Peak Coincidence Factor PCF...
AI summary Table 352 presents unitary peak demand savings values for commercial heat pump clothes dryers, including parameters such as time cycle, peak coincidence factor, and unitary peak demand savings. The table references the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program and includes calculation methods based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 354: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Server-based Power Management Software Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Energy Savings Factor for a Desktop Computer [kWh/year] ESFD 356 Based on ENERGY STAR Computer Power Man...
AI summary Table 354 presents electrical unitary energy savings values for server-based power management software, including energy savings factors for desktop and laptop computers, quantities of power-managed devices, and unitary energy savings calculations. The data is based on assumptions from the ENERGY STAR Computer Power Management Savings Calculator and a 2004 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Report.
Table 355: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Server-based Power Management Software Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Demand Savings Factor for a Desktop Computer [W] DSFD 68 Based on ENERGY STAR Computer Power Management Saving...
AI summary Table 355 provides unitary peak demand savings values for server-based power management software, including demand savings factors for desktop and laptop computers. These values are calculated based on assumptions from the ENERGY STAR Computer Power Management Savings Calculator.
Summary [Table](#page-79-1) 356 presents a summary of the values used to calculate server virtualization and decommissioning savings. The detailed methodology follows.
AI summary Table 356 summarizes the values used to calculate server virtualization and decommissioning savings, with a detailed methodology provided afterward.
Table 356: Server-based Server Virtualization and Decommissioning Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Removed servers must be properly disposed of and not be reused in any form, r...
AI summary Table 356 outlines the parameters for the Server-based Server Virtualization and Decommissioning Measure under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It specifies that removed servers must be properly disposed of and not reused, and provides details on energy savings calculations based on unit specifications.
Table 357: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Server Virtualization and Decommissioning Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Servers to Be Retired RS Actual (minimum of 8) Use information in TS Power Use in Idle [W] of a Serve...
AI summary Table 357 outlines the parameters and calculations used to determine electrical unitary energy savings from server virtualization and decommissioning. It includes details such as server power use, utilization rates, and energy savings calculations. The table is used to evaluate the impact of energy efficiency programs like Business Energy Rebates (BER).
Table 359: Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Measure Summary Parameter BER-AR, SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure ENERGY STAR® certified UPS to reduce energy losses, rebated after installation - Baseline No UPS...
AI summary Table 359 outlines the Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) measure summary, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates (BER-AR, SBES) program. It details parameters such as measure description, baseline, installation rate, and energy savings, with specific emphasis on energy losses reduction through ENERGY STAR® certified UPS units.
Table 360: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Parameter Symbol BER-AR, SBES Reference Energy Use per Rated kVA - 204 CMUA California 2017 TRM UPS Power [kVA] 𝑘𝑉𝐴 Actual Use information in TS Uni...
AI summary Table 360 provides electrical unitary energy savings values for Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems, including energy use per rated kVA, UPS power in kVA, and unitary energy savings in kWh/year. The table references the CMUA California 2017 TRM and specifies that calculations are based on specification data for each rebated unit.
Table 361: EUL Values for BNI LED Lamps and Fixtures Measure Program Component Average Rated Lifetime (hours) Annual HOU (hours/year) Equipment Life 2025 Equivalent EUL LED Omnidirectional (A-lamp and Globe) SBES 25,000 3,600 6.9 1.0 Four...
AI summary Table 361 presents Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various BNI LED lamps and fixtures under the SBES and BER-AR programs. The table includes data on average rated lifetime, annual HOU, equipment life, and 2025 equivalent EUL for different LED products.
Table 362: EUL Values for Non-LED Lighting BNI Measures Measure Program Component EUL Value Reference Lighting Controls Occupancy Sensors BER-IR, BER-AR, SBES 10 GDS, 2007 (Table 2 – Commercial & Industrial Measures, value for occupancy se...
AI summary Table 362 presents EUL (Effective Useful Life) values for various non-LED lighting BNI measures under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) and Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) programs, referencing studies and reports from multiple organizations including KEMA, IESO, and ERS.
KEMA. Focus on Energy Evaluation Business Programs: Measure Life Study. Prepared for PA Consulting Group Inc., August 2009. Measure Program Component EUL Value Reference HVAC Air-source Heat Pumps Greater Than or Equal to 65,000 Btu/hr BER...
AI summary The document presents a measure life study for various energy efficiency programs, including heat pumps and economizer controls, with Effective Useful Life (EUL) values derived from sources such as the California Public Utilities Commission and Natural Resources Canada.
andard assumption is that savings are achieved for one year. After that one-year period, the bulb would have to be replaced with bulbs available in store, which are assumed to be LED starting in 2025. For solar fixtures, a measure life of...
AI summary The document discusses assumptions regarding the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of lighting fixtures, particularly LED bulbs and solar lamps. It highlights that savings are assumed for one year before replacement, and for solar lamps, a 10-year EUL is used based on motion sensors. An equivalent EUL of 2.5 years was calculated for a specific measure using an equation and values from Table 1.
E-12E1 (NSEB) RIRs 1-66 - Redacted
90 passages
E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL Impact of 2027-2031 DSM Plan on Residential Customers Bills 7 b) Please provide background information to support the $600 incentive 8 per unit in 2027....
AI summary The text outlines information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) to EfficiencyOne (E1) regarding the impact of the 2027-2031 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan on residential customer bills, specifically focusing on the justification for a $600 incentive per unit for heat pump cleaning, cost breakdowns, and assumptions about the number of mini-split heads cleaned per customer.
Heat pump configuration Number of outdoor units Number of indoor units Average price per visit 1 1 $277.97 1 2 $372.71 1 3 $472.73 1 4 $562.14 1 5 $650.44 E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIA...
AI summary The document outlines E1's responses to the Nova Scotia Energy Board's information requests regarding heat pump configurations and incentive calculations. E1 assumed an average of two outdoor and two indoor units per customer and provided estimated PAC results for heat pump cleaning measures using a $200 incentive. The calculations were manually performed and are presented as approximations.
25 • For the "Solar Security Fixture" measure under the "Efficient Products 26 Installation" program: 1 a) Efficient Product Installation appointments are focused on installing 17 Table 3: Estimated PAC Results for Energy Star Certified Co...
AI summary The document discusses the 'Solar Security Fixture' measure under the 'Efficient Products Installation' program. It mentions incentives for Energy Star Certified Combination Washer/Dryer units and provides projected participation counts from 2027 to 2031.
plate and an Excel-based tool) that prescribes both frequency and methodology of updates. The scope of the project focused on financial incentives, though the other types of incentives were discussed. The jurisdictional research involved p...
AI summary The document discusses a project focused on financial incentives within a jurisdictional research study, highlighting the performance of ENS compared to Nova Scotia's Achievable Potential study. It notes the lack of formalized documentation on incentive design, but identifies key principles used across jurisdictions through research and interviews.
Jurisdictional Scans CLEAResult undertook jurisdictional scans of various provincial and state utilities and energy efficiency agencies to: - 1) identify the incentive level setting methodologies and best practices in other jurisdictions;...
AI summary CLEAResult conducted jurisdictional scans of provincial and state utilities and energy efficiency agencies to identify incentive level setting methodologies and best practices. The scans focused on geographical similarity, portfolio maturity, and recognized market leadership. Results were used to benchmark ENS's program incentives and inform recommendations.
Study of Nova Scotia's Market To tailor the final findings to Nova Scotia's market, efforts were taken to understand the current landscape of energy efficiency programming, from both the perspective of EfficiencyOne and other major stakeho...
AI summary The study of Nova Scotia's market focuses on energy efficiency programming, considering the perspectives of EfficiencyOne and other stakeholders. It includes research on the electricity market, supply and demand forecasts, population and building demographics, and regulatory structures that influence incentive setting for energy efficiency programs.
Program Financial Simulation To test the recommendations, a program financial simulation was conducted for both the Instant Savings and Custom programs. The current incentives were evaluated against multiple criteria, with a recommendation...
AI summary A program financial simulation was conducted to evaluate the Instant Savings and Custom programs, assessing the appropriateness of current incentives against multiple criteria.
Incentive Setting for Energy Efficiency Programs Energy conservation programs feature different types of incentives to attract participation. The underlying theory behind the design of energy conservation programs is that some energy effic...
AI summary Energy conservation programs use incentives to overcome barriers such as cost, time, and lack of knowledge. The three main types of incentives are financial, convenience, and educational/technical assistance. Financial incentives are the most common in utility and government-sponsored programs to help residential and business customers make energy-efficient choices.
Supply Chain and Stakeholder Discussion In designing and delivering any best-in-class energy efficiency program, it is important to involve the supply chain and key stakeholders such as industry associations, other government agencies and...
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of involving the supply chain and stakeholders in energy efficiency programs to ensure effective delivery, identify market barriers, and align incentives. It highlights the need for stakeholder input in incentive-setting, program design, and awareness of existing market incentives.
Unique Combination Customer Cost Considered Rationale for Selection Residential Customer LED A Lamp Purchase Current Incandescent A Lamp Burned Out (Replacement on Burnout) Retail Price Residential customers for small purchases look at ret...
AI summary The text discusses how different customer segments consider various cost parameters when making energy-related purchases. Residential customers typically focus on retail price for small purchases, while larger purchases involve project costs, incremental equipment costs, and payback. Commercial customers also consider upfront costs, lifecycle operations, and payback when evaluating incentives.
Budget Threshold Measure level, program or portfolio budgets can also limit incentive levels. For example, for high-volume measures, there may be an overall budgetary restriction due to the volume risk of participation. Additionally, certa...
AI summary Budget thresholds can limit incentive levels in energy efficiency programs, particularly for high-volume measures. Jurisdictions may use unitary savings metrics like \/kWh to cap incentive spending. Commercial and industrial sectors generally have lower \/kWh spending compared to residential, requiring a balance to maintain program effectiveness within available budgets.
The Role of Financing If upfront costs are an issue, but not monthly or annual cash flows, the provision of low-interest or zero-interest financing may be valued by customers, either as a stand-alone incentive, or in combination with an up...
AI summary The document discusses the role of financing in energy efficiency programs, noting that low-interest or zero-interest financing can be valuable for customers facing upfront costs but not cash flow issues. It also mentions that customers generally prefer upfront incentives over financing if both are mutually exclusive, and highlights the inclusion of financing costs in program budget analysis.
FINDINGS AND IDENTIFIED BEST PRACTICES Our jurisdictional research has shown that the majority of jurisdictions employ similar methodologies and approaches to setting incentives. All of the jurisdictions have broad program design, TRM and/...
AI summary The jurisdictional research highlights that most regions use similar methodologies for setting incentives, though no single consolidated process exists. EfficiencyOne already performs many of these steps, so the recommendations focus on detailed nuances. The process involves program design, TRM, and market research, with analysis conducted in parallel rather than sequentially.
Table 7: Research Engagement Phase Research and Engagement Phase Technology Research This research is conducted with the goal of understanding the savings opportunity for the technology, and to establish a range for the incentive level. Al...
AI summary This section discusses the Research and Engagement Phase, focusing on technology research to understand savings opportunities and establish incentive levels. It highlights the use of TRMs by various jurisdictions, including Efficiency Maine and Con Ed New York, and outlines the components of a TRM maintained by program administrators.
Year Residential Energy Savings (GWh) Business, Not for Profit and Institutional Savings (GWh) Residential Demand Reduction (MW) Business, Not for Profit and Institutional Demand Reduction (MW) Fully Allocated Residential Expenditure ($ mi...
AI summary The document presents tables summarizing energy savings and expenditures related to efficiency programs in Nova Scotia and other jurisdictions. It includes data on residential and business energy savings, demand reduction, and expenditure allocations from 2010 to 2014. It also compares unit costs of conservation and energy savings percentages across different regions.
se of this, measures and projects that pass the TRC and PAC are only able to claim the benefit of avoided energy costs until 2020. After 2020, they can claim both avoided energy and capacity benefits. This can be a challenge since momentum...
AI summary The document discusses the challenges of aligning energy efficiency programs with avoided costs, noting that after 2020, programs can claim both energy and capacity benefits. It highlights the difficulty in adjusting program portfolios to annual variations in avoided costs and mentions that other jurisdictions, like Oregon, have addressed this by providing cost-effectiveness relief. The text also notes that ENS is considering local avoided costs and discount/premium zones for electricity conservation.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA'S PROGRAM PORTFOLIO The following table contains a summary of ENS's current programs, target market and incentive structure. Commercial customers are defined as businesses, not-for-profits and institutional customers.
AI summary This section introduces Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENSC) program portfolio, targeting commercial customers such as businesses, not-for-profits, and institutional customers. It outlines the current programs, target market, and incentive structures.
Table 15 : ENS Program Overview Program Name Program Offer and Incentive Structure Type of Program (for CE modelling purposes) Residential Direct Install and Rental Properties and Condos Residential customers receive products directly inst...
AI summary This table outlines three ENS programs: Residential Direct Install and Rental Properties and Condos, Green Heat, and New Home Construction. Each program provides incentives or services for residential customers to improve energy efficiency through product installation, financing, and design review.
18 Email Communication from EfficiencyOne Program Management Staff – May 25, 2016 Program Identified Barriers Incentive Strategy 3) Retailers and their employees show varying degrees of awareness, engagement and knowledge of the program. A...
AI summary The email discusses barriers to participation in the Home Energy Assessment program, including customer lack of knowledge and concerns about upfront costs. It outlines strategies such as subsidized assessments, personal energy planning, and incentives for installing eligible measures to address these barriers.
Basis for Customer Cost Incentive Threshold Customer and Decision Suggested Basis Suggested Upper Limit Low Income Customer, Direct Install Model Project Cost 100% Residential Customer, Small Purchase at Retailer Retail Price, Incremental...
AI summary The document outlines the suggested basis and upper limits for customer cost incentive thresholds for various customer types and decision models, including low-income customers, residential, and commercial and industrial customers.
Substantiation for Upper Limits The values for the upper limits have been recommended from the jurisdictional studies and CLEAResult's experience from program design and incentive setting activities. The concept of setting Upper Limits for...
AI summary The document discusses the recommendation of upper limits for incentive levels based on jurisdictional studies and CLEAResult's experience. It suggests 50% for small purchases and 70-100% for small business direct install programs, acknowledging the need for annual review as market conditions change.
http://energy.novascotia.ca/sites/default/files/Our-Electricity-Future.pdf General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities Understand Financial Impacts EfficiencyOne conducts cost effectiveness testing using the TRC test. The T...
AI summary EfficiencyOne currently uses the TRC test for cost effectiveness at the measure and program levels, but does not conduct ex-post analysis. A new software system is being implemented to track measure implementations. Recommendations include improving incentive screening thresholds and increasing data tracking frequency for better budget risk insight.
EXISTING INCENTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The existing incentive development process should be followed for all existing incentives. While it does not necessarily need to be step-wise, all four steps should be covered in the analysis. It woul...
AI summary The existing incentive development process requires following four steps in analysis, even if not strictly step-wise. Completing step (4) is difficult without first completing steps (1)-(3). A figure is referenced but not detailed in the text.
Other Considerations for Business Energy Rebates Program From reviewing program operations, the Business Energy Rebates program tracks retail pricing through the application process. This allows program managers to understand if incentive...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates program tracks retail pricing to ensure incentive levels are appropriate. It forecasts a high Program Administration Committee (PAC) score, assuming cost-effectiveness thresholds are not breached. However, the lack of customer/project information for Instant Rebates and challenges in aligning with local avoided costs may impact the program's effectiveness.
Measure 2014 Retail Price 2014 PMI 2014 PME Estimated 2016 Retail Price 2016 Cost to Consumer (Estimated 2016 Retail Price – Current Incentive) Estimated 2016 PME Cost to Consumer Less than PME? Current Incentive as % of Retail Price ENERG...
AI summary The table provides a comparison of retail prices, program measure incentives, and cost-to-consumer estimates for various energy efficiency products and measures between 2014 and 2016. It includes details such as incentives, cost reductions, and percentages of retail prices covered by incentives.
CUSTOM PROGRAM FINANCIAL SIMULATION For the Custom Program Retrofit track, the program financial simulation analysis included the following steps: - 1. Identify the average project parameters for the analysis; - 2. Determine an appropriate...
AI summary The Custom Program Retrofit track involves a financial simulation analysis with steps to identify project parameters, determine incentive level thresholds, and compare current incentives to these thresholds to assess if changes are needed.
Measure Energy Savings Persistence Cost Effectiveness Threshold Custom Project Retrofit Track 10 3.14 Custom Project Retrofit Track 15 4.50 Custom Project Retrofit Track 20 5.69 Table 35: Cost Effectiveness Incentive Level Threshold for Av...
AI summary Table 35 outlines the cost effectiveness incentive level thresholds for average projects in the Custom Project Retrofit Track, showing persistence levels of 10, 15, and 20 with corresponding thresholds of 3.14, 4.50, and 5.69 respectively.
Table 37: Jurisdiction Overview Jurisdiction Current Framework Period Annual Savings Target Annual Budget ($ million) % Incentive Unit Cost of Savings Target Target per Retail Sales Residential Retail Rates Nova Scotia (ENS) 2016-2018 135....
AI summary Table 37 provides an overview of energy efficiency programs across various jurisdictions, including Nova Scotia, Ontario, British Columbia, California, and others. It outlines framework periods, annual savings targets, budgets, incentive percentages, unit costs of savings targets, and residential retail rates for each jurisdiction.
Electricity Market The following entities are the key players in the electricity system in Ontario. - Ontario Government Ministry of Energy - Ontario Energy Board (OEB) - Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) - 72 Local Distributi...
AI summary The document outlines key players and responsibilities in Ontario's electricity market, including the Ministry of Energy, Ontario Energy Board (OEB), Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), and Local Distribution Companies (LDCs). The IESO manages conservation efforts, sets savings targets, and oversees program delivery, while the OEB regulates LDCs and reviews rate applications.
Program Net Savings (GWh) Expenditure Appliance Retirement 58 Not available Retailer Coupons 280 Not available Heating & Cooling Incentive 174 Not available Home Assistance Program 55 Not available Other Residential Programs 5 Not availabl...
AI summary The document presents a table showing energy efficiency programs with their net savings and expenditures, followed by another table with TRC and PAC values for different program categories. The data provides insights into the performance of energy efficiency initiatives across residential, business, and industrial sectors.
FUTURE TARGETS The Conservation First Framework covers the time period from 2015-2020. The province-wide budget for the six years is $2.2 billion, of which LDCs are provided with $1.8 billion. The IESO retains some funds for central servic...
AI summary The Conservation First Framework (2015-2020) allocates a total budget of $2.2 billion, with $1.8 billion provided to Local Distribution Companies (LDCs). The total Ontario target for energy savings during this period is 8.7 TWh, with LDCs having a combined target of 7 TWh. Each LDC must develop a CDM plan aligned with their budget and target.
ONTARIO CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Currently, the conservation programs in Ontario cover the residential, low income, small business, commercial and industrial, and large industrial sectors. The programs cover financ...
AI summary Ontario's conservation programs target multiple sectors, offering financial incentives and support for energy efficiency. The province has implemented rigorous evaluations and updated baselines, such as T8 lighting, and recently introduced a pay-for-performance framework for LDC funding, marking a first in North America.
APPENDIX A-2: ONTARIO GAS (UNION GAS) Program Name Program Area Program Measures Links Heating & Cooling Incentive Residential This program features mail-in or online submission of rebates through participating HVAC contractors for qualify...
AI summary This appendix outlines a residential heating and cooling incentive program offering rebates for high-efficiency furnaces and central air conditioners. The incentives are based on up-front cost differences and program cost-effectiveness, with a specific equipment mix allocation.
Figure 23: Union Gas Targets & Performance Metric[s](#page-37-0) 4 Resource Acquisition Scorecard Low Income Total Large Volume Large Volume - Revised Large Volume Overhead - Revised Evaluation - Revised Administrative costs - Revised Larg...
AI summary The text presents a resource acquisition scorecard with various financial figures and targets related to energy efficiency programs, including low-income initiatives, market transformation, and administrative costs. It includes actuals, revised targets, and performance metrics.
Costs Under the TRC-plus test include: - Costs incurred by program participants (incremental costs) - Costs of running the energy efficiency programs (delivery and administration costs)
AI summary The TRC-plus test includes incremental costs incurred by program participants and the costs of running energy efficiency programs, such as delivery and administration costs.
EXISTING MAIN PROGRAMS – UNION GAS [4](#page-37-1) Program Area Program Name Description Incentives Links Home Reno Rebate Program provides an audit of customer homes to identify areas of improvement and also rebates or incentives to perfo...
AI summary The Home Reno Rebate program by Union Gas offers home audits and incentives for energy efficiency improvements, including insulation, air sealing, and appliance upgrades, with specific incentive amounts for various improvements.
- 4. Net Levelized cost ($/kWh)1 = PV (costs all benefits except for electric energy benefits) / PV (energy savings) Benefits Costs Renovation Rebate Program5 Primarily focused on lowering space heating load, this program is targeted towar...
AI summary The text discusses two residential energy efficiency programs: the Renovation Rebate Program, which provides incentives for energy-efficient retrofits in electrically heated homes, and the New Home Program, which encourages the construction of homes exceeding B.C. Building Code energy efficiency standards. Both programs offer financial incentives based on energy performance metrics.
INCENTIVE LEVEL SETTING METHODOLOGY PG&E's Energy Efficiency Products organization was formed approximately six years ago in part to standardize and streamline the measures developed and marketed through PG&E's breadth of energy efficiency...
AI summary PG&E's Energy Efficiency Products organization was established to standardize and streamline energy efficiency measures. The organization evaluates new technologies and sets appropriate incentive levels, using a structured process called SPARC. PG&E employs a streamlined version of the E3 Cost Effectiveness model to ensure incentives are set appropriately while maintaining portfolio-level cost effectiveness.
History In 1999, Oregon lawmakers and citizens envisioned a future with Oregon homes and businesses powered by clean, affordable energy. They established stable, consistent funding to help Oregonians invest in energy efficiency and renewab...
AI summary In 1999, Oregon established the Energy Trust of Oregon as a non-profit to invest in energy efficiency and renewable resources. It began operations in 2002 under the Oregon Public Utilities Commission, aiming to deliver cost-effective services with low administrative costs and high customer satisfaction. Customers of four utilities across two states fund and benefit from its programs.
Energy Trust of Oregon Funding Through state legislation, tariffs and other requirements, Energy Trust is funded by customers of Portland General Electric, Pacific Power, NW Natural and Cascade Natural Gas. Customers of all four utilities...
AI summary Energy Trust of Oregon is funded by customers of Portland General Electric, Pacific Power, NW Natural, and Cascade Natural Gas through a public purpose charge and state legislation. Energy Trust delivers energy-efficiency and renewable energy programs, with increased savings and funding after the passage of SB 838 in 2008. Expenditures rose from $63 million in 2008 to $117 million in 2013.
Costs The OPUC has defined that the following elements be considered when determining the costs from the societal perspective 15 (i.e., Total Resource Cost): - 1. Total cost of efficiency measures and actions 16 , including costs to the En...
AI summary The OPUC outlines the elements to consider when determining societal costs, including total efficiency measure costs, Energy Trust administrative and program management costs. It clarifies that utility system tests include only Energy Trust incentives and associated administrative costs, while excluding tax credits and certain program costs paid by federal or state agencies.
MEASURE DEVELOPMENT & INCENTIVE SETTING PROCESS The Energy Trust has created a standardized, four step process (see Appendix A for flow chart) by which to introduce new measures to their product portfolio and set their maximum eligible inc...
AI summary The Energy Trust has established a four-step standardized process for introducing new measures and setting maximum eligible incentives. This process allows the Energy Trust and its program delivery agents to balance measure incentives with delivery and administration expenses while meeting their goals.
Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) What is a MAD: It is the decision of record determining measure cost effectiveness and authorizing use of a measure. The measure is clearly defined along with the conditions under which it is approved. Th...
AI summary The Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) is a formal decision outlining the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency measures and authorizing their use. It includes sections such as scope, program applicability, description of the measure, cost effectiveness, and requirements. All MADs are approved by Energy Trust engineering staff after analysis by delivery contractors.
Program Analysis Initiatives Target Market Incentive Setting Methodology Residential Gas Rebate (Gas) Residential customers looking to upgrade HVAC, water heater, or install programmable thermostats. Rebate for water heaters, boilers, furn...
AI summary The document outlines various residential energy efficiency programs, including gas rebates for HVAC upgrades and a bounty program for energy-efficient appliances. Incentives vary by initiative and target market, with specific rebates and rewards for customers upgrading to more efficient equipment.
Cost Effectiveness Testing Under the EEPS, NYSEDRA was required to conduct cost effectiveness testing at the project level. The TRC is used as the cost effectiveness test. Prior to the implementation of the EEPS, the TRC was applied at the...
AI summary Under the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS), the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) was required to perform cost effectiveness testing at the project level using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) metric. Previously, under the Clean Energy Fund (CEF), the TRC was applied at the program level, and this approach will be reinstated.
2012 2013 2014 2012–2014 Total Energy savings in megawatt- hours (MWh) 110,179 85,582 91,146 286,907 Total Resource Benefits 2 $118,358,445 $83,830,177 $82,101,439 $284,290,061 U.S. tons of carbon dioxide emissions avoided through efficien...
AI summary The document presents energy savings and performance indicators for the period 2012–2014, including energy savings in MWh, total resource benefits, and carbon dioxide emissions avoided through efficiency programs. It also outlines key quantifiable performance indicators (QPIs), such as electric savings, demand reduction, and the ratio of benefits to spending.
EFFICIENCY VERMONT CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Program Name Program Area Program Measures (Prescriptive Incentives) Links Agricultural Equipment Rebates Agricultural (Commercial) Lighting Equipment Rebates are pai...
AI summary The document outlines Efficiency Vermont's core program offerings for residential and business customers, focusing on rebates for agricultural equipment and appliances. Rebates are paid after purchase and submission of a rebate form, with products qualifying based on a list or specifications.
MARKET STRUCTURE OVERVIEW The Efficiency Maine Trust Act came in effect in 2009 and is responsible for Efficiency Maine's inception as an independent Trust. Their purpose is to develop, plan, coordinate, and implement energy efficiency/alt...
AI summary The Efficiency Maine Trust Act, effective since 2009, establishes Efficiency Maine as an independent entity responsible for energy efficiency programs. The Trust sets long-term energy savings goals, develops triennial plans, and ensures programs meet cost-effectiveness criteria. Funding comes from ratepayers, the Forward Capacity Market, and utility contracts. Energy efficiency is identified as the lowest-cost energy resource in Maine, with specific cost metrics provided.
Figure 57: 2011-2015 Gas Savings Result [11](#page-109-0) Year Total (MMBtu) 2011 16,115 2012 1,845 2013 12,169 2014 30,839 2015 19,274 Total 80,242 Figure 58: Gross Electricity Savings 12 Program Annual kWh Savings Lifetime kWh Savings Ef...
AI summary The document presents data on gas savings from 2011 to 2015 and electricity savings from various programs in Efficiency Maine. The figures highlight the total energy savings and associated costs and benefits of different initiatives.
Figure 59: Gross Gas Savings [12](#page-110-0) Program Annual MMBtu Savings Lifetime MMBtu Savings Efficiency Maine Costs Participant Cost Lifetime Energy Benefit Cost/MMBTu (Lifetime) Benefit-to- Cost Ratio Business Incentive Program Natu...
AI summary This table presents the gross gas savings and related costs and benefits for various energy efficiency programs in Maine, including business incentives, low-income initiatives, home energy savings, and multifamily efficiency programs. The data includes annual and lifetime savings in MMBtu, program costs, and benefit-to-cost ratios.
Figure 61: Benefit- Cost Ratios: Electric Programs 2015 [12](#page-110-0) Adjusted Gross Benefit-to-Cost-Ratio Net I Benefit-to-Cost-F Ratio Programs TRC PACT Last Evaluation Net to Gross Ratio TRC PACT Business Incentive Program Electric...
AI summary Figure 61 and Figure 62 present benefit-cost ratios for electric and natural gas programs in 2015, including programs such as the Business Incentive Program and Low-Income Direct Install Initiative. These figures highlight the adjusted gross benefit-to-cost ratios and net-to-gross ratios for various programs, providing insights into their cost-effectiveness.
Figure 63: Electric Program Expenditures 2015 [12](#page-110-0) Program Incentive Delivery Total Business Incentive Program Electric Measures $15,642,304 $1,520,601 $17,162,905 Large Customer Program Electric Measures $6,439,194 $544,245 $...
AI summary Figure 63 presents electric program expenditures in 2015, detailing various programs and their associated incentive, delivery, and total costs. Programs include business incentives, home energy savings, low-income initiatives, and cross-cutting strategies, with total expenditures reaching over $45 million for electric measures and additional costs for natural gas and other fuels.
Overview of Electricity Market The following entities make up the electricity system in Massachusetts. - National Grid - Massachusetts Government: Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs: Department of Public Utilities (DPU) - Mass Save...
AI summary The electricity system in Massachusetts includes entities such as National Grid, the Department of Public Utilities, and ISO New England. National Grid submits multi-year energy efficiency plans to the Department of Public Utilities, which oversees utility services, ensuring reliability, safety, and affordability for customers.
MASSACHUSETTS ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS POLICY Massachusetts is viewed as one of the leading jurisdictions for promoting energy efficiency in North America. It is ranked as the #1 jurisdiction in ACEEE's 20...
AI summary Massachusetts is a leader in energy efficiency, with aggressive targets and a three-year planning cycle mandated by the Green Communities Act. The state aims to achieve 2.6% of retail sales in energy efficiency savings by 2015, with funding coming from sources like the Systems Benefit Charge and cap-and-trade programs. A portion of the budget is dedicated to low-income programs.
NATIONAL GRID CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Program Name Program Area Program Measures Links Heating & Cooling Residential and Low Income Mail-in rebate for Central Air Conditioners, Air Source Heat Pumps, Heat Pump W...
AI summary The document outlines National Grid's core program offerings for residential and business customers, including heating and cooling rebates, deep energy retrofit incentives, and access to financing programs. These programs aim to improve energy efficiency and reduce costs for customers.
Inputs - Avoided Supply Costs (energy and capacity); - Local Avoided Supply Costs (energy and capacity); - Fixed Program Administration Costs; - Year of Implementation; - Measure Participation; - Variable Costs; - Annual Operating Costs (F...
AI summary The text lists various cost and efficiency-related factors and metrics used in energy programs, including avoided supply costs, program administration costs, energy savings, and financial parameters such as discount and inflation rates.
Scope: The scope of the internal audit included assessing the design and operating effectiveness of 6 key controls identified by EfficiencyOne, covering 14 control activities in EfficiencyOne's control matrix for BER-IR. The focus was to a...
AI summary The internal audit evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of 6 key controls in EfficiencyOne's BER-IR program from January 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022, focusing on compliance with internal processes and risk management.
t ing R ort ide nti fie d b the ot he nly e h th Ad dit ion ally thi th d f rep or g a mo un orm on re ca pe ep y r a s o on as e s m ay re mo ve e n ee or , nts . F the B rd Op tin Re rt, the B ER -IR da ta to rfo th alc ula tio ica tio f...
AI summary The document discusses the analysis of Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates (BER-IR) data and its use in calculating the accuracy of Business Energy Rebates – Annual Rebates (BER-AR) efficiency. It also references a table and mentions processes related to validation and program management.
- 16 ii) Please refer to part (b) of this IR response. 1 Request IR-24: 16 design decision to prioritize near-term affordability for Nova Scotia ratepayers while 17 continuing to deliver long-term value. The $63.75 million annual investmen...
AI summary The document discusses a design decision to prioritize near-term affordability for Nova Scotia ratepayers while continuing to deliver long-term value. A $63.75 million annual investment is allocated to energy efficiency, demand response, and solar-PV. The downward trend in energy savings and peak demand savings is attributed to changes in investment allocation, including a front-loaded energy efficiency investment and a shift to accommodate the planned ramp-up in demand response.
3.1 ANH_RETRO CUSTOM – EQUITY DESERVING - RETROFITS - Custom provides large business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants with technical assistance, - financial incentives, and project financing to help reduce their electricit...
AI summary The Custom program provides technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to large businesses, non-profits, and institutions to reduce electricity consumption and peak demand. It includes Retrofit, New Construction, Building Optimization, and Pay-for-Performance services, with a new service for low-income and equity groups under consideration for the 2027-2031 DSM plan. EfficiencyOne claims savings for certain Custom projects over multiple years.
3.2 CUS-NC_001 CUSTOM – NEW CONSTRUCTION - Custom provides large business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants with technical assistance, - financial incentives, and project financing to help reduce their electricity consumpti...
AI summary The Custom – New Construction program provides technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to large businesses, non-profits, and institutions to reduce electricity consumption and peak demand. Eligible projects must meet specific size and energy savings criteria, and EfficiencyOne claims savings based on phased project completion.
1 3.2.1 MEASURE IDENTIFIERS & DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS Measure ID (Plan) CUS-NC_001 Measure ID (Incremental Cost) BNI__CUS-NC_001 Common Measure Name Custom - New Construction Sector BNI Program Name Custom Incentives Program Component Cus...
AI summary This section outlines a measure related to custom incentives for new construction under the BNI program. It includes identifiers, sector, program name, and other defining characteristics of the measure.
1 3.2.3 MEASURE LIFE - 2 Value: 19 Years - Source: Derived based on information in Table 19[2](#page-61-3) 3 from the Custom Incentives Evaluation 2024. - 4 Details: To estimate the EUL, E1 divided Total gross lifetime energy savings at th...
AI summary The document discusses the estimation of the Energy Unit Life (EUL) based on data from Table 19 and the Custom Incentives Evaluation 2024, with a value of 19 years derived from total gross lifetime energy savings at the generator divided by total annual energy savings.
12 3.2.5 INCREMENTAL COST - 13 Value: $382,537.50 (in $2025) - 14 Unit: per GWh saved - 15 Source: Refer to CUS_IND_001 - 16 Details: The incremental cost for this measure is assumed to be consistent with CUS_IND_001. 2 2024 Custom Incenti...
AI summary The incremental cost for a specific energy efficiency measure is valued at $382,537.50 per GWh saved in 2025, based on data from CUS_IND_001 and evaluations from 2024 and 2025 Custom Incentive Evaluations.
Source: Derived based on information in Table 19[4](#page-62-1) from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. Partial Savings Claimed Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2024 Total Number of Projects 1 27 28 Energy Savings Tracked Gr...
AI summary The table presents data on energy and peak demand savings from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. It includes metrics such as gross energy savings, adjustment ratios, line loss factors, and effective useful life for projects fully claimed in 2024. The data is used to evaluate the impact of energy efficiency initiatives.
Value: 9.094 Source: Derived based on information in Table 11[8](#page-66-1) from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. Details: To estimate the EUL, E1 calculated the average EUL of the three categories of Retrofit program measures (Part...
AI summary The document discusses the estimation of EUL based on the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation, using data from Table 11 to calculate the average EUL of three Retrofit program categories, weighted by their lifetime gross savings.
12 3.3.5 INCREMENTAL COST - 13 Value: $382,537.50 (in $2025) - 14 Unit: per GWh of energy savings - 15 Source: Incremental Costs were developed by Apex Analytics in 2024. - 16 Details: The incremental cost of this measure is assumed to be...
AI summary The incremental cost for the measure is estimated at $382,537.50 per GWh of energy savings, based on an average incentive of 15 cents per kWh multiplied by 2.5. This multiplier was recommended due to insufficient program tracking data, with Apex Analytics citing the EmPOWER 2023 report as a reference. Future evaluations should collect more specific data for Nova Scotia.
3.5 CUS-P4P_001 CUSTOM - PAY FOR PERFORMANCE - Custom provides large business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants with technical assistance, - financial incentives, and project financing to help reduce their electricity consu...
AI summary The Pay-for-Performance (P4P) program provides financial support for energy efficiency upgrades to large businesses, non-profits, and institutions, with incentives based on verified energy savings. Eligibility requires annual electricity consumption of at least 1,000,000 kWh and a 10% reduction in consumption. EfficiencyOne (E1) claims savings over multiple years, and savings are normalized on a per GWh basis.
- Incentives Evaluation. This table is reproduced below. _ Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2022 Final Savings for Multiyear Projects Total Number of Projects 22 58 80 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (...
AI summary The document presents a table evaluating incentives based on energy and peak demand savings, including metrics like gross energy savings, adjustment ratios, and effective useful life. It focuses on the evaluation of program outcomes and their impact on energy efficiency.
Value: 11.20 Years - Source: Derived based on information in Table 21[15](#page-74-3) from the 2022 Custom Incentives Evaluation. - Details: To estimate the EUL, E1 divided Total gross lifetime energy savings at the generator by Total annu...
AI summary The estimated Effective Useful Life (EUL) is 11.20 years, derived from Table 21 in the 2022 Custom Incentives Evaluation by dividing total gross lifetime energy savings at the generator by total annual energy savings.
3.6 CUS-BO__001 CUSTOM – BUILDING OPTIMIZATION - Custom provides large business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants with technical assistance, - financial incentives, and project financing to help reduce their electricity con...
AI summary Custom offers building optimization services to BNI participants, including technical and financial support for investigations and low-cost energy efficiency measures. EfficiencyOne claims savings for Custom projects based on phased implementation, with measure characteristics normalized on a per GWh basis.
3 3.6.2 KEY SOURCES FOR MEASURE INPUT DEVELOPMENT - The primary source of the values for measure input development is Table 24 [18](#page-78-2) 4 from the 2024 Custom - 5 Incentives Evaluation. This table is reproduced below.
AI summary The primary source for measure input development is Table 24 from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation, which is reproduced below.
3.6.3 MEASURE LIFE - Value: 1.76 Years - Source: Derived based on information in Table 24[19](#page-79-3) from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. - Details: To estimate the EUL, E1 divided Total gross lifetime energy savings at the gen...
AI summary The document provides a measure of Effective Useful Life (EUL) for a program, calculated as 1.76 years based on data from Table 24 in the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. The EUL was estimated by dividing total gross lifetime energy savings by total annual energy savings.
3.6.6.1 Energy Savings (kWh) Value: 1,000,000 Source: By construction. - Details: Due to the heterogenous nature of this bundled measure, the unit basis of "per GWh of savings" - is used to determine the appropriate costs and incentives ne...
AI summary This section discusses energy savings measured in kWh, with a value of 1,000,000. The savings are calculated using a unit basis of 'per GWh of savings' to determine the costs and incentives required to achieve 1 GWh of savings, due to the heterogenous nature of the bundled measure.
3 3.7.2 KEY SOURCES FOR MEASURE INPUT DEVELOPMENT - The primary source of the values for measure input development is Table 32[22](#page-82-3) 4 from the 2024 Custom - 5 Incentives Evaluation. This table is reproduced below.
AI summary The primary source for measure input development values is Table 32 from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation, which is reproduced below.
- E1 for this service. This was based on tracked program data for the program. Input Description 2022 2023 2024 A Evaluated Gross at meter Energy Savings (GWh) 3.177 3.381 4.478 B Total Incentives $442,679 $498,179 $552,292 C = B /A Total...
AI summary The table provides data on energy savings and incentives for E1, showing increasing energy savings and incentives from 2022 to 2024, with a calculated unit cost that fluctuates over the years.
3.7.6.1 Energy Savings (kWh) - Value: 1,000,000 - Source: By construction. 2024 Custom Incentive Evaluation, Net Savings, page 68 (PDF 840/1442) - 1 Details: Due to the heterogenous nature of this bundled measure, the unit basis of "per GW...
AI summary The section discusses energy savings in kWh, highlighting 1,000,000 kWh of savings achieved through a bundled measure. The savings are calculated on a per GWh basis, reflecting the heterogenous nature of the measure and the costs and incentives required to achieve 1 GWh of savings.
3 3.7.6.2 Coincident Peak Demand Savings (kW) 4 Value: 120.2 - Source: Derived based on information in Table 32[24](#page-84-0) 5 from the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. - 6 Details: This value was calculated by dividing the Gross Peak...
AI summary The value of 120.2 for Coincident Peak Demand Savings (kW) is derived from Table 32 in the 2024 Custom Incentives Evaluation. It is calculated by dividing the Gross Peak Demand Savings at the Meter by the Gross Energy Savings at the Meter.
3.8 BER-AR__LGT_INHORT_001__0 AR - INDOOR - HORTICULTURAL LIGHTING - BER provides financial incentives in the form of prescriptive rebates or financing to business, non-profit, - and institutional (BNI) participants to foster reductions in...
AI summary The BER program provides rebates and financing to BNI participants in Nova Scotia to reduce electricity consumption and peak demand. The program includes Application Rebates and Instant Rebates, with different eligibility criteria and participant details tracking capabilities. Distributors play a key role in promoting and supporting the program.
- is reproduced below. BER-AR Parameter Retrofit New Construction Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Horticultural after installat lighting rebated tion - Baseline Existing lighting Metal halide HID fixtur...
AI summary This table provides parameters related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) and Application Rebates (AR) program, including measure descriptions, baseline conditions, installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters for lighting retrofits and new construction.
3.8.6.1 Energy Savings (kWh) - Value: 2,058.18 - Source: Value is an average or recent tracked evaluated savings for this measure. - Details: In practice, energy savings calculations are based on specification data for each rebated unit. -...
AI summary This section discusses energy savings measured in kilowatt-hours, with a value of 2,058.18 derived from an average or recent evaluation. Energy savings are calculated based on specification data for rebated units, with specific equations and parameters outlined in the 2024-2025 Measure Assessment under the Horticultural Lighting Measure.
$$Unitary\ Peak\ Demand\ Savings\ [kW] = \frac{(W_b[W] \times Qty_b[-] - W_e[W] \times Qty_e[-]) \times PCF \times IE_{PD}}{1.000}$$ ВЕ R-AR Parameter Symbol Retrofit New Construction Reference Peak Coincidence Factor [-] PCF Actual ctual...
AI summary The document presents a formula for calculating unitary peak demand savings, along with a table outlining parameters and their values. It references the 2024 DSM Evaluation Reports and mentions BER (Business Energy Rebates) providing financial incentives for energy-efficient measures, such as small ductless mini-split heat pumps.
4.1.4 NET TO GROSS Value: 1.0 Source: As set out in the 2024 DSM Program Evaluation Reports, [31](#page-93-6) free-ridership and spillover effects are nil since participants are non-profits or low-income housing owners with limited budgets...
AI summary The document discusses the Net to Gross (NTGR) value of 1.0 applied to the 2024 DSM Program Evaluation Reports due to nil free-ridership and spillover effects from participants in non-profit or low-income housing. It also outlines the direct installation cost, energy savings, and coincident peak demand savings associated with the program. The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program is highlighted, focusing on the installation of energy-efficient products and its role in residential demand response.
4.3 EPI__HVAC_HUMS_EPI_001__0 HUMIDITY SENSOR - EPI provides participants with free-of-charge direct installations of energy efficient products. EPI has - played a pivotal role in transforming the residential lighting market by making ener...
AI summary EPI provides free direct installations of energy-efficient products, focusing on electrician-installed measures to support residential demand response. It is funded by electricity ratepayers and the Nova Scotia government's Green Fund. The program has evolved to phase out lighting measures as LEDs become standard and has introduced new technologies like smart thermostats.
4.8 HEA_HVAC_BE_CI HEA BUILDING ENVELOPE - CUSTOMER INSTALLED - HEA is a home energy evaluation-based program component that encourages homeowners to improve - the energy efficiency and comfort of their homes by providing them with related...
AI summary The HEA Building Envelope - Customer Installed program provides energy efficiency evaluations and rebates to homeowners in Nova Scotia. The Canada Greener Homes Grant, co-delivered through HEA, was closed to new applications in February 2024, ending support for certain measures. Some low uptake and demand reduction measures were removed from the program in 2022, but existing rebates remain valid for prior enrollments.
4.10 HW_BE_EI HW BUILDING ENVELOPE - E1 INSTALLED ASFH provides energy efficient retrofits and heat pump installations to income-qualified Nova Scotian owners of both electrically heated and non-electrically heated homes at no cost to part...
AI summary The HomeWarming (HW) and Affordable Solutions for Home Efficiency (ASFH) programs provide energy efficiency retrofits and heat pump installations to income-qualified Nova Scotian homeowners. HW focuses on building envelope measures and is delivered by E1 since 2023, while ASFH targets homes primarily heated with electricity. Participants may also access the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) and Oil to Heat Pump Affordability (OHPA) programs.
4.15.6.2 Coincident Peak Demand Savings (kW) Value: 0.000 Source: This is the deemed unitary peak demand savings value for the Smart Thermostat for Electrical Heating Systems Measure[71](#page-155-1) in the 2025 Measure Assessment. Details...
AI summary The document discusses the deemed unitary peak demand savings value of 0.000 for the Smart Thermostat for Electrical Heating Systems Measure in the 2025 Measure Assessment. It also outlines details about Outdoor Heavy Duty Timers under the Instant Savings program, including measure identifiers, program components, measure life, net-to-gross ratios, and incremental costs.
3.4.3.1 Deep Retrofit Navigator pilot The Deep Retrofit Navigator pilot was designed to provide comprehensive project management support, from an assigned project "Navigator", to complete deep energy retrofits for homeowners in HRM. The pi...
AI summary The Deep Retrofit Navigator pilot provided project management support to homeowners in HRM for deep energy retrofits, offering rebates and financing to reduce financial barriers. The pilot yielded 533 GJ/year in energy savings and identified customer segments and financing risks for future initiatives.
12 Table 7: 2025 Free-ridership, Spillover, and NTGRs Program Component and Measure Type Spillover Levels NTGRs Residential Appliance Retirementa Refrigerators 43% 0% 0.57 Freezers 45% 0.55 Air Conditioners 47% 0.53 Small Refrigerators 32%...
AI summary Table 7 presents data on free-ridership, spillover, and NTGRs for various residential and appliance programs in 2025. It details percentages for different program components such as appliance retirement, instant savings, and energy-efficient appliances.
19 Tracked Evaluated Difference in Reason for Difference Program Component Annual Net Annual Net Net Savings between Tracked and Savings (GWh) Savings (GWh) (GWh) Evaluated 11.430 -4.551 Tracked used previous NTGRs for non-lighting Instant...
AI summary The document compares tracked and evaluated annual net savings for various program components, highlighting discrepancies due to differences in NTGR calculations and the inclusion of unclaimed savings. The Instant Savings program had a significant difference due to the use of previous NTGRs for non-lighting products, while the Affordable Single Family Homes program had a minor difference due to unclaimed savings from 2024.