E-22021 DSM Evaluation Reports
271 passages
Evaluated savings Gross and net energy or peak demand savings calculated by the Evaluator using the parameters (unitary savings values, installation rates, interactive effects, net-to-gross ratio, etc.) validated or measured during the eva...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency programs, including evaluated savings, participant spillover, in-service rate, installation rate, and lifetime energy savings. These terms describe methods of calculating energy savings and the performance of installed efficiency measures over time.
Site Visits The Evaluator performed a total of 106 on-site visits during the summer and fall of 2021. For Business Energy Rebates, the objective of on-site visits was to collect data to establish or validate some of the parameters used in...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted 106 on-site visits in 2021 to validate data and parameters for various programs, including Business Energy Rebates, Affordable Multifamily Housing, and Efficient Product Installation. These visits aimed to ensure accuracy in savings calculations and model simulations.
Energy Model Reviews Assisted by Participant Follow-up Interviews After initial file reviews, the Evaluator concluded that the virtual site visits were not required given the available documentation, and instead opted to complete energy mo...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted energy model reviews for 12 Custom New Construction projects by comparing models against as-built drawings, project documentation, and follow-up interviews, adjusting models to establish evaluated savings.
2.1.4 Effective Useful Life Review The Evaluator reviewed the EUL values for any new measures to ensure they were valid and revised them where appropriate. The EUL update was based on a literature review of the most recent technical refere...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised effective useful life (EUL) values for energy efficiency measures based on technical reference manuals and considered the evolution of baselines over time to calculate lifetime energy savings and adjusted EUL for projects.
2.1.5 Gross Savings Analysis Gross savings refer to changes in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants regardless of their reasons for participating. Upon completion of the impact evaluation activities described abo...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of gross savings from energy efficiency programs, including interactive effects and peak demand savings. Interactive effects are calculated based on site-specific or provincial averages, while peak demand savings are derived from electrical energy savings using established ratios and engineering calculations.
3.1 Individual Impact Evaluation Results [Table](#page-27-0) 6 and [Table](#page-28-0) 7 below respectively list the evaluated energy and peak demand savings as well as the corresponding savings tracked by EOne for each program component o...
AI summary The section presents the results of individual impact evaluations for energy and peak demand savings from 2021 programs. Net savings are calculated using the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), and lifetime energy savings are based on the effective useful life (EUL) of efficiency measures. Line loss factors were submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) as part of a 2014 study.
Table 6: Comparison of 2021 Evaluated and Tracked Energy Savings at the Generator Portfolio Total 141.346 111.047 138.896 0.79 109.418 1,548.786 99% BNI Subtotal 90.978 71.663 88.668 0.77 68.142 970.670 95% Direct Installation Small Busine...
AI summary Table 6 compares the 2021 evaluated and tracked energy savings across different programs and portfolios, including BNI, residential, and DSM initiatives. It highlights energy savings metrics such as annual gross and net savings, NTGR, and lifetime net energy savings for various programs like Small Business Energy Solutions, Strategic Energy Management, and the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project.
Strategic Energy Management - › SEM net energy and peak demand savings did not meet targets. - › The SEM participation level has remained stable over the past four years - › While adjustments to energy savings were minor, adjustments made...
AI summary The Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program's net energy and peak demand savings have not met targets. Participation levels have remained stable, but adjustments to peak demand savings were significant due to unreported savings by EOne. A new methodology for estimating EUL values has led to higher average EUL for SEM.
3.3 Lifetime Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life values for measures offered by EOne and their associated lifetime energy savings. The Evaluator found that the DSM portfolio generated 1,548.786 GWh in lifetime e...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life (EUL) of energy efficiency measures in the EOne portfolio, finding that the DSM portfolio generated 1,548.786 GWh in lifetime energy savings. Measures with longer EUL, such as insulation and new home construction, contribute disproportionately to lifetime savings compared to annual savings.
6.1 Market Transformation and Codes and Standards The literature review was first aimed at defining MT: "The strategic process of intervening in a market to create lasting change in market behaviour by removing identified barriers or explo...
AI summary The section discusses market transformation (MT) programs, explaining their strategic role in removing barriers to energy efficiency. It notes that as products become more efficient, traditional incentive-based programs face challenges. MT programs cover a range of technologies and include activities like training, code enforcement support, and marketing tool development.
Table 16: 2021 Recommendations on Business, Non-profit, and Institutional Program Components No. Recommendation SEM – R1 Develop guidelines on the usage of bottom-up approaches in SEM and ensure they are consistent with program objectives....
AI summary The recommendation focuses on developing guidelines for using bottom-up approaches in SEM, ensuring consistency with program objectives and integrated energy management strategies at the facility level. The guidelines should define conditions for use, M&V requirements, and align with multi-year reporting and overall energy performance improvement.
APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Components Bibliographic References ADS ASSOCIÉS, Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d'économies d'énergie – résidence unifamiliale, report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. NRCan, Air-s...
AI summary This appendix provides a list of bibliographic references for various energy efficiency studies and reports, including evaluations of residential lighting and heat pump technologies, as well as regulatory documents and studies conducted by organizations such as Efficiency Nova Scotia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Calculation of the Weighted Average of Adjustment Ratios The weighted average was calculated by using the following formula and applying the adjustment ratios and tracked energy savings generated by Mail-in lighting measures: Weighted Aver...
AI summary The weighted average adjustment ratio was calculated using a formula that multiplies each project's adjustment ratio by its tracked energy savings, then divides the sum by the total tracked energy savings. The result was 0.993, based on 87 evaluated projects related to Mail-in lighting measures.
Calculation of the Weighted Standard Deviation Since the overall adjustment ratio is based on a weighted average, the Evaluator used the weighted standard deviation of the adjustment ratio for the calculation instead of the standard deviat...
AI summary The weighted standard deviation of the adjustment ratio for energy savings was calculated using a specific formula. This approach was used because the overall adjustment ratio is based on a weighted average. The weighted standard deviation for the adjustment ratio of energy savings for lighting measures was determined to be 0.427.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. Table 14: 2021 ARet Effects and NTGR 17 Table 15: Evaluated 2021 ARet Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings 19 Table 16: Evaluated 2021 ARet GHG Emission Reduction...
AI summary The document provides definitions and includes multiple tables related to energy efficiency programs, rebate evaluations, and savings data from 2021. It discusses topics such as accuracy, energy savings, GHG reductions, and free-ridership levels for various programs.
Table 42: Average LED Prices by Fixture Type, 2017-202171 Table 43: Free-ridership Level for LED Fixtures 2019-2021 72 Table 44: Overview of 2021 Key Factors in Program Planning74 Table 45: Overall 2021 Residential Efficient Product Rebate...
AI summary The document contains a list of tables and figures related to energy efficiency programs, including average LED prices, free-ridership levels, and participation metrics for residential and commercial programs. It also includes figures that track savings, shipments, and market evolution for LED lighting in Atlantic Canada.
Table 21: 2021 Instant Savings Evaluation Approach Evaluation Objectives Research Questions Methodology Collect information on participant and partner perspectives › What is the awareness level about Instant Savings and how did participant...
AI summary Table 21 outlines the 2021 Instant Savings Evaluation Approach, detailing objectives, research questions, and methodology for evaluating the program. It includes data collection methods such as participant surveys and retailer interviews to assess awareness, satisfaction, and the program's impact on energy savings and market evolution of LED products.
Calculations Using Evaluation Results Building on all the above methods and collected data. the Evaluator calculated the first-year and lifetime energy and peak demand savings using the calculation methodology presented in Section [8](#pag...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated first-year and lifetime energy and peak demand savings using the methodology outlined in Section 8. The 2020–2022 Measure Assessment serves as a reference for calculating energy and peak demand savings for EOne's DSM program portfolio, including effective useful life measures for all measures offered.
Table 25: 2021 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Energy Savings Product Tracked Savings [kWh/year] Evaluated Savings [kWh/year] ENERGY STAR Certified LED Non-A-type Lamps (R, BR, and Decorative) 45.0 47.2 ENERGY STAR Certified...
AI summary Table 25 presents the 2021 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Unitary Energy Savings for various energy-efficient products. The table compares tracked and evaluated savings in kWh/year for different items such as LED lamps, motion sensors, thermostats, and water heaters, indicating varying levels of energy savings impact.
8.2.5 Effective Useful Life The Evaluator validated the EUL values based on the 2020–2022 Measure Assessment. The EUL values are used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. [Table](#page-137...
AI summary The Evaluator validated Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values based on the 2020–2022 Measure Assessment, which are used to calculate long-term electrical energy savings. Revised EUL values were applied to gross and net first-year savings to determine lifetime savings, resulting in different weighted average EUL values for gross and net savings.
8.2.6 Evaluated Gross Savings The annual gross savings are based on the revised unitary savings values established for each product sold in 2021. The results are presented in [Table](#page-139-0) 29 further below. The gross savings at the...
AI summary The annual gross savings are calculated using revised unitary savings values for products sold in 2021. Line loss factors of 1.095 and 1.147 were used to estimate gross energy and peak demand savings, respectively. These factors were submitted to the NSUARB as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. Gross energy savings at the generator were estimated at 15.792 GWh, with a weighted average EUL of 8.12 years.
Evaluated 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings (Continued) Product Category Outdoor Motion Sensors Power Bars with Timers Smart Power Bars Heavy-duty Outdoor Timers Programmable Thermostats Smart Thermostats for EBB Clot...
AI summary The document presents a table evaluating the 2021 Instant Savings Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for various product categories. It includes metrics such as energy savings, NTGR, line loss factor, and lifetime energy savings, but reports zero peak demand savings across all categories.
[Table](#page-181-1) 4 presents the corrected tracked savings values obtained as a result of all the changes made by the Evaluator, which are described in this appendix.
AI summary Table 4 shows the corrected tracked savings values after changes made by the Evaluator, as detailed in the appendix.
Scenario 2 Would-be acquirer in the secondary market would not have acquired another unit. The appliance is therefore used as a secondary unit by the acquirer who normally would not have sought the secondary unit. This means that there wou...
AI summary Scenario 2 describes a situation where a secondary market acquirer would not have obtained an appliance otherwise, leading to an additional appliance on the grid. This scenario does not require removing secondary market impacts on energy consumption from gross savings. Tables 6 to 10 outline various appliance scenarios and their energy impacts, using default assumptions from the UMP that may be refined with future research.
Evaluation Approach The evaluation was aimed at calculating program component gross and net results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, as well as avoided greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. For Gree...
AI summary The evaluation approach focuses on calculating program component gross and net results, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided greenhouse gas emissions. It also includes market evaluation for Green Heat.
Table 1: Summary of Existing Residential Program Evaluation Program Evaluation Type Component Impact Process Market Methodology › Tracking sheet audit › Unitary savings review HEA Condensed › Calculations using evaluation results › GHG emi...
AI summary The document presents a summary of the evaluation of existing residential programs, including methods such as participant surveys, tracking sheet audits, on-site visits, and GHG emission reduction calculations. It outlines different evaluation types, such as condensed and comprehensive, and includes specific programs like HEA, Green Heat, Efficient Product Installation, MHEEP, and AMH.
Table 2: Overall 2021 Existing Residential Participation and Evaluated Savings Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit HEA Energy Savings 3.618 GWh 0.96 3.481 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 96...
AI summary Table 2 presents the 2021 participation levels and evaluated savings for various residential energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. It details energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings for programs such as Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, Efficient Product Installation, Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project, and Affordable Multifamily Housing, along with net-to-gross ratios and net savings.
Table 3: Comparison of 2021 HEA Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value Energy Savings Tracked Savings by EOne 3.618 GWh 0.96 3.481 GWh Evaluation Res...
AI summary Table 3 compares 2021 Home Energy Assessment (HEA) tracked and evaluated savings, including energy and peak demand savings. It highlights gross savings, net savings, and realization rates, with NTGR values calculated as the ratio of net to gross savings. The table also notes the inclusion of unconverted D assessment spillover savings and deductions from Green Heat and EPI savings.
Table 6: Comparison of 2021 EPI Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value Energy Savings EOne Tracked Savings 8.347 GWh 0.91 7.621 GWh Evaluation Result...
AI summary Table 6 compares the gross and net energy and peak demand savings tracked and evaluated by EOne in 2021. The evaluation results show a slight decrease in energy savings but a higher realization rate compared to tracked savings. Peak demand savings also show similar trends with a 103% realization rate.
Calculations Using Evaluation Results Building on all the above methods and collected data, the Evaluator calculated the first-year and lifetime energy and peak demand savings as per the calculation methodology presented in Section [3](#pa...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated first-year and lifetime energy and peak demand savings based on typical energy consumption, excluding changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
3 HEA IMPACT EVALUATION The objectives of the 2021 HEA impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as effective useful life (EUL) values and associate...
AI summary The 2021 HEA impact evaluation aimed to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, effective useful life values, and associated lifetime energy savings.
3.1 Tracking Sheet Audit To ensure program component results were reliably compiled, the Evaluator first performed a tracking sheet audit aimed at verifying the completeness and consistency of the data submitted by EOne. The verification a...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted a tracking sheet audit to verify the completeness and consistency of data submitted by EOne, identifying and correcting errors in savings calculations, capping errors, and heat pump demand savings. The audit revealed that the increasing complexity of the tracking sheet, particularly due to changes in HEA, increases the risk of errors and necessitates reorganization.
3.2 Gross Savings For HEA, gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from measures implemented by HEA participants regardless of their reasons for participating. 4 As part of the 2020- 2022 Measure Assessment a...
AI summary This section discusses gross savings related to the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, explaining that it measures changes in energy consumption due to implemented measures. The Evaluator reviewed installation rates, energy savings values, and applied overestimation ratios to calculate space heating savings as part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities.
Where: - $\rightarrow$ Elec_Heating D and Elec_Heating E correspond to electrical space heating consumption levels during the D and E assessments respectively. - $OR_D$ and $OR_E$ correspond to the overestimation ratios used to adjust mode...
AI summary This section explains the calculation of electrical space heating consumption and overestimation ratios during D and E assessments, and identifies non-modelled energy savings from specific heating systems not accounted for in the HOT2000 model.
Wood, pellet, and solar air space heating equipment is not modelled in HOT2000. Instead, energy savings are calculated based on unitary energy savings values. The detailed savings calculations are presented in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessm...
AI summary The document notes that wood, pellet, and solar air space heating equipment are not modelled in HOT2000, with energy savings calculated using unitary values. The 2020-2022 Measure Assessment provides detailed savings calculations. In 2021, no changes were made to tracked savings, and no solar air equipment was installed under HEA, so no unitary value was established for that measure.
Table 15: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Space Heating Mini-split Heat Pumps Variable Symbol Value Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump at outdoor air temperature of -15 °C [kBTU/h] 𝐻𝐶𝑚𝑖𝑛 Specification data for each installe...
AI summary Table 15 presents unitary peak demand savings values for space heating mini-split heat pumps. It includes variables such as rated heating capacity, coefficient of performance for baseline and new heat pumps, and conversion factors. The values are based on specifications for each installed system.
For space heating measures that are not modelled in HOT2000, specific peak demand savings values were used for the 2021 evaluation (instead of applying a peak demand-to-energy ratio) to be consistent with Green Heat. The detailed calculati...
AI summary For space heating measures not modelled in HOT2000, specific peak demand savings values were used in the 2021 evaluation to align with Green Heat, with detailed calculations provided in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment.
3.2.5 Effective Useful Life As part of 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The EUL values established i...
AI summary The document discusses the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values used in calculating electrical energy savings for 2020-2022, noting that EUL values from 2019 remain valid for water heating measures but were revised for space heating measures due to changes in the distribution of implemented measures.
3.2.6 Evaluated Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of measure installed through HEA in 2021 are listed in [Table](#page-103-0) 18 below. Overall, total gross electrical energy and peak demand savings amounted to 3.618...
AI summary The annual gross savings from energy efficiency measures installed through HEA in 2021 are detailed, showing total electrical energy and peak demand savings of 3.618 GWh and 1.722 MW respectively. These savings are calculated using line loss factors and include contributions from the Klondike pilot. The weighted average EUL value for gross energy savings is 20.8 years.
Measure Category Electric Thermal Storage Three-element Water Heaters DHW Heater Timers Total Number of Participants/Units 16 0 1 961 Evaluated Energy Savings Unitary Energy Savings (kWh) N/A N/A N/A - Gross Energy Savings Without OR – at...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data from a Home Energy Assessment program, including participant numbers, energy savings metrics, line loss factors, and peak demand savings across various heating technologies. It highlights total energy savings and effective useful life for these measures.
3.3.6 Evaluated Net Savings Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions specifically attributable to HEA. Net savings were calculated by applying the NTGR value, adding unconverted D assessment spillover savings, and subtracting G...
AI summary Net savings from HEA are calculated using the NTGR value and adjusted for spillover and deduction factors. The 2021 net energy savings were estimated at 3.481 GWh and 1.495 MW, with lifetime savings of 72.399 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 20.8 years.
Table 23: Evaluated 2021 HEA Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Total Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 3.305 NTGR 0.75 Unconverted D Assessment Spillover Energy Savings (GWh) 0.740 Net Energy Savings Without Savings...
AI summary Table 23 presents the evaluated 2021 HEA net energy and peak demand savings, including gross and net savings at the meter and generator, as well as deductions for Green Heat and EPI. The table also highlights the effective useful life and net lifetime energy savings. Applying a Nova Scotia-specific GHG factor to the savings results in 2,033 tonnes of annually avoided CO2 eq.
2021 HEA Impact Evaluation Highlights - › HEA achieved 3.481 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.495 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2021. - › Evaluated net energy and peak demand savings were identical to the trac...
AI summary The 2021 HEA Impact Evaluation highlights that the Home Energy Assessment program achieved 3.481 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.495 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2021. The evaluated savings were identical to the tracked results.
4 HEA KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As mentioned previously, the main objectives of the 2021 HEA evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net HEA results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand sa...
AI summary The 2021 HEA evaluation aimed to calculate gross and net results, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions. This section outlines the Evaluator's key findings and recommendations related to these objectives, with additional details provided in Appendix III.
6 GREEN HEAT EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 Green Heat evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation and a market evaluation. The main objectives of the evaluation were as follows: - › Collect information on participant perspectives - ›...
AI summary The 2021 Green Heat evaluation focused on assessing the impact and market evolution of mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs), with objectives including collecting participant perspectives, calculating energy savings and emissions reductions, and analyzing market trends.
Unitary Savings Review The Evaluator updated the unitary peak demand savings for CASHPs based on characteristics of the models installed in 2021. The 2020-2022 Measure Assessment 10 was updated accordingly. 10 The 2020-2022 Measure Assessm...
AI summary The Evaluator updated the unitary peak demand savings for conventional air-source heat pumps (CASHPs) based on 2021 model characteristics. The 2020-2022 Measure Assessment was updated to reflect these changes, providing detailed parameters for calculating energy and peak demand savings in EOne's DSM program.
8.2.2 Unitary Energy Savings To establish Green Heat unitary savings, the Evaluator relied on a combination of billing analyses, energy models, engineering algorithms, and literature reviews. The 2020-2022 Measure Assessment provides a det...
AI summary The Evaluator used billing analyses, energy models, and literature reviews to establish Green Heat unitary savings. Energy savings for heat pump measures are calculated per capacity, while biomass measures use unchanged average unitary values. Solar measures use the RETScreen tool due to their rarity.
8.2.3 Unitary Peak Demand Savings Peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand period of the electricity system. The projected electricity demand peak period in Nova Scotia is defined as t...
AI summary This section discusses unitary peak demand savings in Nova Scotia, focusing on calculations for various measures installed through Green Heat. It outlines how savings are calculated for different technologies, such as MSHPs, CASHPs, GSHPs, and others, and notes that some values have been revised based on performance data.
8.2.5 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculations of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The EUL values establis...
AI summary The document discusses the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values used in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities to calculate electrical energy savings. The EUL values from the 2020 evaluation remain valid for the 2021 evaluation, and the equivalent EUL values are applied to gross and net first-year savings to determine lifetime savings.
Evaluated 2021 Green Heat Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings (Continued) Measure Solar DHW Solar Thermal Air Heating Electric Thermal Storage Three element Water Heaters DHW Heater Timers Total Number of Units - - 235 43 71 3,654 Energy...
AI summary The table provides data on energy and peak demand savings from various measures in the 2021 Green Heat program. It includes the number of units, energy savings, line loss factors, and lifetime energy savings. The figure compares tracked and evaluated energy savings, showing they are the same for all measures.
Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions specifically attributable to Green Heat. Net savings were estimated by applying the NTGRs listed above to the evaluated gross savings using the following equation: Net Savings = Gross Sa...
AI summary The text defines net savings for Green Heat as energy use reductions attributable to the program, calculated using NTGRs applied to gross savings. In 2021, net energy savings were estimated at 6.795 GWh and peak demand savings at 6.451 MW, with lifetime savings of 122.306 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 18.0 years.
11.3 Participation History direct installations. As presented in [Figure](#page-152-0) 26 below, EPI had 10,028 DSM participants, which represents a 15% increase in participation compared to 2020. 34 This can be explained in large part by...
AI summary The document discusses the participation history of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, highlighting a 15% increase in participants in 2021 compared to 2020. Despite this, the average number of products installed per household decreased, and savings per participant also declined slightly. LED lamps remain the most popular product type, contributing significantly to energy savings.
12 EPI EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 EPI evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation. The main objectives of the 2021 EPI evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net EPI results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime en...
AI summary The 2021 EPI evaluation focused on calculating gross and net energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions. The evaluation aimed to address key research questions and utilized specific methods outlined in Table 46.
14.2.6 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. Apart from lighting pro...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed effective useful life (EUL) values for energy efficiency measures as part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment. EUL values for lighting products and pipe insulation were updated, while others remained unchanged. Revised EUL values are used to calculate gross and net lifetime electrical energy savings, leading to differences in weighted average EUL values.
LED Lamps Product Category 18 W Replacing 100 W 7 W BOB Replacing 60 W PAR20 7 W Replacing 50 W PAR30 8 W Replacing 53 W PAR30 8 W Replacing 75 W PAR38 15 W Replacing 90 W Number of Units Number of Units 420 817 6,749 0 0 234 Installation...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data for various LED lamp products, including the number of units installed, energy savings, and peak demand savings. It also includes factors such as interactive effects and line loss, which adjust the energy savings calculations based on installation rates and other considerations.
Low-flow Showerheads LED Nightlights Faucet Aerators 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Number of Units Number of Units 9,949 5,418 224 186 3,323 Installation Rate (%) 94% 85% 96% 96% 96% Number of Units Installed 9,352...
AI summary The table details energy savings from the installation of low-flow showerheads and other efficiency measures, including units installed, energy savings, and peak demand reductions. It includes metrics like energy savings at the meter and generator, interactive effects factors, and line loss factors for different product types.
Thermostatic Shower Valves Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Product Category 1.5 gpm 2.0 gpm 2.5 gpm (per feet) Wraps Number of Units Number of Units 3 4 1,349 6,936 2,139 Installation Rate (%) 88% 88% 88% 100% 100% Number of Units Installed...
AI summary The document presents a detailed table of energy savings data for various energy efficiency programs, including thermostatic shower valves, pipe insulation, and hot water tanks. It includes metrics such as number of units installed, energy savings, peak demand savings, and factors like interactive effects and line loss.
A Air Sealing Kits - Heat Pump Heatin g Total for Product Category Foam Gaskets Door Sweeps Window Air Sealing Door Weather Stripping Single-family Homes Number of Units Number of Units 1,347 88 185 333 146,393 Installation Rate (%) 31% 10...
AI summary The table presents data on energy savings from various home insulation products, including air sealing kits, foam gaskets, door sweeps, window air sealing, and door weather stripping. It provides details on the number of units installed, energy savings, peak demand savings, and other metrics related to single-family homes.
Thermostatic Shower Valves Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Product Category 1.5 gpm 2.0 gpm 2.5 gpm (per feet) Wraps Number of Units Number of Units 0 0 73 85 103 Installation Rate (%) 88% 88% 88% 100% 100% Number of Units Installed 0 0 64...
AI summary The document presents a table with data on energy savings from various efficiency measures, including thermostatic shower valves, pipe insulation, and hot water tanks. The table includes metrics such as installation rates, energy savings, and peak demand savings, along with factors like interactive effects and line loss. The data is used to evaluate the overall impact of these measures on energy consumption.
Low-flow Showerheads LED Nightlights Faucet Aerators 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.268 0.563 0.042 0.052 1.299 NTGR 0.90 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 Net Energy Sav...
AI summary The table presents energy savings and peak demand savings data for various low-flow showerhead programs, including LED nightlights, faucet aerators, and different flow rate reductions. It includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, NTGR, line loss factors, and lifetime energy savings.
Thermostatic Shower Valves Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Product Category 1.5 gpm 2.0 gpm 2.5 gpm (per feet) Wraps Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.000 0.000 0.149 0.074 0.297 NTGR 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Net En...
AI summary The table presents energy and demand savings for various efficiency programs, including thermostatic shower valves, pipe insulation, and hot water tanks. It includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, net lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, and line loss factors for each product category.
Product Category Define del le Air Sealing Kits – Electric Resistance Heating Retractable Clotheslines Foam Gaskets Door Sweeps Window Air Sealing Door Weather Stripping Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.291 0.063...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data for various products under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including gross and net energy savings, NTGR, line loss factors, and peak demand savings at the meter and generator levels. The data is used to assess the effectiveness of energy efficiency measures.
Product Category A Foam Gaskets Door Sweeps Window Air Sealing Door Weather Stripping Total for Single- family Homes Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.017 0.007 0.011 0.025 7.471 NTGR 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 - Net Ener...
AI summary The text presents a table detailing energy savings and peak demand savings for various home insulation products, including foam gaskets, door sweeps, window air sealing, and door weather stripping. The table includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, NTGR, line loss factors, and net lifetime energy savings, all calculated for single-family homes.
15 EPI KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As mentioned previously, the main objectives of the 2021 EPI evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net EPI results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand s...
AI summary The 2021 EPI evaluation found that net electrical energy and peak demand savings fell short of targets, with savings per participant decreasing due to fewer LED lamp installations. The lighting market's evolution is a key challenge for maintaining savings, and adjusted installation rates led to a 2% decrease in gross evaluated energy savings.
16.1 MHEEP Description MHEEP provides energy efficiency upgrades to band-owned homes in Mi'kmaw communities at no cost to participants or the community. EOne works with community housing managers (HMs), two delivery agents (DA), and Mi'kma...
AI summary MHEEP provides energy efficiency upgrades to Mi'kmaw band-owned homes at no cost, managed by EOne, community housing managers, delivery agents, and Mi'kmaw-preferred contractors. It includes home energy assessments, building envelope upgrades, and appliance replacements. Funding comes from electricity ratepayers and the Province of Nova Scotia. MHEEP was suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic and aimed for specific energy savings in 2021.
Tracking Sheet Audit Prior to performing the savings review, the Evaluator performed an audit of the final 2021 tracking sheet to ensure it was complete and the entered data were consistent. The detailed protocol used for the tracking shee...
AI summary An audit of the final 2021 tracking sheet was conducted prior to the savings review to ensure completeness and data consistency. The audit protocol and results are detailed in Appendix XVII.
18.2.1 Energy Savings The savings from building envelope and space heating measures are estimated using pre-retrofit (D assessment) and post-retrofit (E assessment) energy models from HOT2000 simulations. Electrical savings are calculated...
AI summary The document describes the method used to estimate energy savings from building envelope and space heating measures using HOT2000 simulations, including a formula for calculating gross space heating savings in kWh based on pre- and post-retrofit assessments.
Where: - › % corresponds to the proportion of space heating covered by electrical heating systems during the D assessment. - › SHC corresponds to total space heating consumption (all fuel types combined). - › OR corresponds to the overesti...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation of energy savings for the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Program (MHEEP) using overestimation ratios (ORs) derived from billing analyses. The ORs adjust modelled energy consumption based on the type of heating systems present during assessments. Savings are calculated by comparing D and E assessments, and specific measures like programmable thermostats are evaluated using unitary savings values.
18.2.4 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The EUL for building en...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed effective useful life (EUL) values for building envelope upgrades and space heating equipment as part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities. These values were revised based on measures installed by HEA participants in 2021, as HEA and MHEEP participants install similar measures.
18.2.5 Evaluated Gross Savings The annual gross savings at the generator are presented in [Table](#page-10-0) 64 below. Overall, the annual gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator amounted to 0.316 GWh and 0.147 MW respective...
AI summary The annual gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are 0.316 GWh and 0.147 MW, respectively, with a weighted average EUL value of 21 years. Line loss factors of 1.0947 and 1.1466 were used for energy and peak demand savings, provided by NS Power and based on values submitted to the UARB in the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update.
A comparison of the energy and peak demand savings values established through this evaluation and those tracked by EOne is presented in [Table](#page-12-0) 66. The realization rate, representing the ratio of evaluated net savings to tracke...
AI summary The document compares energy and peak demand savings values from an evaluation with those tracked by EOne, noting a 100% realization rate for both. It references Nova Scotia Power's 2020 emissions and electricity generation data to calculate a Nova Scotia-specific factor.
19 MHEEP KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As mentioned previously, the main objectives of the 2021 MHEEP evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net MHEEP results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak de...
AI summary The 2021 MHEEP evaluation found that net electrical energy and peak demand savings fell short of targets, achieving only 33% of the energy savings targets. However, average savings per participant increased, especially for peak demand, due to improved calculation methods. The evaluator confirmed that savings tracked by EOne were accurate and made no adjustments.
Effective Useful Life Update Using the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for common measures presented in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment 52 and the proportion of measures implemented through AMH in 2021, the Evaluator calculated the EUL...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of the program component using EUL values from the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment and the proportion of measures implemented through AMH in 2021.
23.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from custom electrical energy saving upgrades such as building envelope measures, space heating measures, and DHW measures implemented by AMH partici...
AI summary Gross savings from AMH projects are calculated based on energy consumption changes from upgrades like building envelope and heating measures. Two project types—comprehensive and prescriptive—are used, with comprehensive projects modeled using tools like HOT2000 and prescriptive projects using the CIRx Screening Tool. The review methodology and findings for 2021 projects are described, including interactive effects and EUL assessments.
23.2.1 On-site Visits and Desk Review Findings The Evaluator conducted a desk review for four prescriptive projects and on-site visits accompanied by simulation model reviews for three comprehensive projects. Reviewed projects were randoml...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted desk reviews and on-site visits for energy efficiency projects, verifying the accuracy of savings calculations. Adjustments were made to one project due to an incorrect heat pump capacity value in the simulation model, while no adjustments were needed for the others.
23.2.4 Evaluated Gross Savings The annual gross savings at the generator are presented in [Table](#page-25-0) 71 below. Overall, the annual gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator amounted to 0.402 GWh and 0.186 MW respective...
AI summary The annual gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are 0.402 GWh and 0.186 MW, respectively, with a weighted average EUL of 17.7 years. Line loss factors were used to estimate these savings, based on rate codes and submitted to the NSUARB in 2014.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 HEA Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluations If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Unitary Savings Partial N/A The Eva...
AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 HEA data fields. It highlights that some data fields are incomplete or inconsistent, and corrective actions were taken by the evaluator, such as adding unitary savings values and correcting equations for peak demand-to-energy ratios.
Once the correct values were established (as per [Table](#page-37-0) 1), the Evaluator validated that the equations in the tracking sheet correctly calculated each of the main program component results, the results of which are presented i...
AI summary The Evaluator confirmed that the equations in the tracking sheet accurately calculate the main program component results, as presented in Table 3 after the correct values were established from Table 1.
Table 3: Verification of 2021 HEA Savings Compilation Program Component Result Valid Equation? (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Gross Energy Savings at the Generator Partial The savings calculation for gross energy savings at th...
AI summary Table 3 verifies the 2021 HEA savings compilation, noting that while some calculations were consistent, others required adjustments. Specifically, the evaluator added columns to calculate gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator and refined heat pump demand savings calculations based on tracked specifications.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 Green Heat Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Unitary Savings (Y/N/Partial)...
AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of the 2021 Green Heat data fields. It indicates that unitary savings data was partially complete and outlines corrections made by the evaluator, including adjustments for pellet and wood stove projects and ETS measures.
[Table](#page-101-0) below presents the corrected tracked savings values resulting from all the changes made by the Evaluator as described in this appendix.
AI summary The text refers to a table that shows corrected tracked savings values after changes made by the Evaluator, as described in the appendix.
Data Accuracy Table 1 lists all the parameters required for the MHEEP evaluation. The Evaluator validated whether the data contained in the tracking sheet submitted by EOne were accurate based on previous evaluation results as well as whet...
AI summary The document discusses the validation of data accuracy in the MHEEP evaluation process, including the verification of data completeness and the actions taken by the Evaluator to adjust data when necessary.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 MHEEP Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluations If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Particip...
AI summary Table 1 verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 MHEEP data fields, including information on heat pump presence, space heating consumption, and rate codes. The data fields are marked as complete, with some noted as not applicable for consistency checks.
Table 1: Site Visit and Desk Review Protocol 1. General Information On-site Visit Date: Company Name: Project ID: Facility Contact Name: Facility Name: Contact Title: Address: Contact Phone: Email: List of people participating in the On-si...
AI summary This document outlines a protocol for conducting site visits and desk reviews, focusing on collecting building and energy efficiency information, verifying energy savings calculations, and ensuring consistency across documentation files.
Evaluation Approach The evaluation was aimed at calculating program component gross and net results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, as well as avoided greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The eval...
AI summary The evaluation approach focuses on calculating program component gross and net results, including energy savings and avoided greenhouse gas emissions, as well as assessing market-related questions. Table 1 outlines the types of evaluations and their corresponding methodologies.
NHC Findings and Recommendations This subsection presents the key findings and recommendations from the NHC evaluation. 2021 NHC-Finding: NHC net electrical energy savings surpassed targets but net peak demand savings fell short of targets...
AI summary The 2021 NHC evaluation found that net electrical energy savings exceeded targets by 6%, but net peak demand savings were below targets by 4%. Participation levels in NHC dropped by 6% compared to 2020, possibly due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and project delays. Evaluated gross savings matched EOne's tracked savings, while net evaluated savings were 3% higher due to a slight increase in the NTGR value.
Table 4: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component, 2021 2021 Program Program Component Process Market Impact New Residential New Home Construction - - Condensed Key findings, electrical first-year and lifetime energy savin...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in 2021, focusing on New Home Construction under the New Residential program. Key findings include electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided greenhouse gas emissions.
1.3 Participation History The evolution of NHC participation levels as well as that of gross energy and peak demand savings from 2012 to 2021 is presented in [Figure](#page-193-0) 5 and [Figure](#page-193-1) 6 below respectively. A total o...
AI summary The participation history of the New Home Construction (NHC) program from 2012 to 2021 shows a decrease in participation in 2021, attributed to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and project delays. Despite this, 853 homes were completed in 2021, with significant energy and peak demand savings achieved.
2 NHC EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 NHC evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation. The main objectives of the 2021 NHC evaluation were as follows: › Calculate NHC gross and net results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime ene...
AI summary The 2021 NHC evaluation focused on calculating both gross and net results, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions. The evaluation involved auditing tracking sheets, applying correct formulas, and using NTGR results from 2020 to calculate net savings and GHG emissions.
GHG Emission Reduction Calculations To obtain net avoided GHG emissions in CO 2 eq for NHC, the Evaluator multiplied the net energy savings by the latest Nova Scotia-specific factor for GHG emissions generated by electricity production. Th...
AI summary The document outlines the method used to calculate net avoided GHG emissions for new home construction (NHC) by multiplying net energy savings with a Nova Scotia-specific GHG emissions factor derived from NS Power data. First-year savings are based on typical energy consumption and do not account for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
3.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from the energy efficiency performance achieved in new homes under NHC. The Evaluator reviewed the gross energy savings calculations, peak demand-to-e...
AI summary This section discusses gross savings, which represent changes in energy consumption due to energy efficiency performance in new homes under NHC. The Evaluator reviewed calculations, peak demand-to-energy ratios, and effective useful life values, with methodologies detailed in subsequent subsections.
3.2.1 Gross Energy Savings Calculations Gross Energy Savings = $$(EC_{To\text{-code}} - BC) \times (1 - OR_{To\text{-code}}) - (EC_{As\text{-built}} - BC) \times (1 - OR_{As\text{-built}})$$
AI summary The document presents a formula for calculating Gross Energy Savings, which involves comparing energy consumption under a code-compliant scenario to an as-built scenario, adjusted by occupancy rates.
Modelled Energy Consumption For each participant, HOT2000 simulations are used to model as-built energy consumption levels, i.e. the energy consumption of a new house as built, and the to-code energy consumption level representing the valu...
AI summary The document discusses the use of HOT2000 simulations to model energy consumption for each participant, distinguishing between as-built energy consumption and to-code energy consumption levels based on current building codes.
Baseload Consumption Baseload consumption is a fixed value of 8,760 kWh for HOT2000 version 10.5 and of 7,118 kWh for HOT2000 version 11. The baseload consumption is removed from the savings calculation since it is not affected by energy e...
AI summary Baseload consumption refers to a fixed value used in HOT2000 versions 10.5 and 11, which is excluded from energy savings calculations as it is not impacted by energy efficiency improvements.
Overestimation Ratio ORs are used to adjust the modelled energy consumption values generated by HOT2000 because the software tends to slightly overestimate savings. The Evaluator considered the OR values established as part of the 2018 HEA...
AI summary The Overestimation Ratio (OR) is used to adjust energy consumption values generated by HOT2000, which overestimates savings. The Evaluator found that OR values from the 2018 HEA evaluation remain valid. ORs will be updated in the next evaluation year to reflect changes in HOT2000 version 11.
3.2.3 Interactive Effects The Evaluator added no interactive effects to the savings calculations since they were already taken into account in the HOT2000 simulations.
AI summary The Evaluator did not include interactive effects in the savings calculations because they were already considered in the HOT2000 simulations.
3.2.4 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The EUL values establish...
AI summary The document discusses the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values used in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities. It notes that EUL values from the 2019 evaluation remained valid for the 2021 evaluation, with specific EUL values assigned to different participant tiers.
[Table](#page-198-2) 11 below presents the annual gross savings for NHC. Overall, the total gross energy and peak demand savings amounted to 6.245 GWh and 2.511 MW at the generator respectively. Based on EUL values of 36 years for Tier 3 p...
AI summary The table presents annual gross energy and peak demand savings for NHC, totaling 6.245 GWh and 2.511 MW respectively. Lifetime gross energy savings are estimated at 190.712 GWh based on EUL values. Line loss factors used in the calculation were updated in the 2019 evaluation and submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board as part of the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update.
Table 11: Evaluated 2021 NHC Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Total Number of Participants 853 Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings Without Overestimation Ratio (OR) – at the Meter (GWh) 6.978 Gross Energy Savings with OR – at the Meter...
AI summary Table 11 presents the evaluated 2021 NHC gross energy and peak demand savings, including metrics like energy savings with and without overestimation ratios, line loss factors, and effective useful life. It also includes peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Net savings represent the savings that can be reliably attributed to a program component. For NHC, net savings are calculated by applying the NTGR value calculation above to the evaluated gross savings, as exemplified in the following equa...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of net savings for the NHC program, using the NTGR value applied to gross savings. Net energy and peak demand savings are reported as 5.683 GWh and 2.285 MW respectively, with lifetime energy savings calculated at 173.548 GWh based on EUL values.
Data Accuracy [Table](#page-10-0) 1 below lists all the parameters required for the New Home Construction (NHC) evaluation. The Evaluator validated whether the data contained in the tracking sheet submitted by EOne were accurate based on p...
AI summary The document discusses the data accuracy process for the New Home Construction (NHC) evaluation, including validation of data from EOne's tracking sheet and the actions taken by the Evaluator to adjust data when necessary.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 NHC Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Participant...
AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of the 2021 NHC data fields, including heating system types, energy consumption models, heat pump performance metrics, and reference data. Most fields are complete and consistent, though some cold climate heat pump data fields are marked as N/A for consistency.
Table 2: Verification of NHC 2021 Data Field Consistency Consistency Verification Consistent (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Verification of Duplicate IDs or Projects Y Verification of Negative As built Modelled Energy Consumpt...
AI summary Table 2 verifies data consistency in the NHC 2021 program. It identifies inconsistencies such as negative energy consumption values, negative savings against incentives, and incorrect savings claims for non-electrical heating systems. Actions taken include capping values at zero and removing participants from the tracking sheet.
1.1 BER Description BER provides financial incentives in the form of prescriptive rebates or financing to business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) participants to foster reductions in electricity consumption and peak demand. All busin...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides financial incentives to BNI participants to reduce electricity consumption and peak demand. The program offers prescriptive rebates and financing, with participation through Mail-in or Instant Rebates. In 2021, participation was affected by supply chain delays, but rebate amounts were increased to boost engagement. The program aimed for 35.681 GWh in energy savings and 7.236 MW in peak demand savings.
BER Instant Rebates Although participant information tracking has improved over the past three years, the available data collected by distributors make it difficult to reliably establish the total number of Instant Rebates participants. Th...
AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program saw an 18% increase in measures rebated in 2021 compared to 2020, with LED linear fixtures contributing the largest share of gross energy savings. Participation in some product categories, like booster pumps and LED directional fixtures, declined significantly.
2 BER EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 BER evaluation comprised a comprehensive impact evaluation as well as a market evaluation. The main objectives of the 2021 BER evaluation were as follows: - › Collect information on participant and partne...
AI summary The 2021 BER evaluation involved a comprehensive impact and market evaluation with objectives including collecting participant perspectives, calculating energy savings, and analyzing LED adoption in the commercial lighting market.
EUL Update As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator also reviewed the effective useful life (EUL) values for all measure categories and recalculated the EUL values of lighting measures for which baseline change...
AI summary As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed and recalculated the effective useful life (EUL) values for lighting measures where baseline changes are expected during their lifetimes.
4.2.1 Adjustment Ratios As part of the 2021 evaluation, the Evaluator conducted on-site visits (n=40) to establish adjustment ratios and determine evaluated savings for lighting measures. The visits were focused on lighting measures that a...
AI summary The 2021 evaluation involved on-site visits to determine adjustment ratios for lighting measures, which accounted for 64% of Mail-in gross energy savings. The adjustment ratio was calculated based on evaluated savings divided by tracked savings. Most adjustments were due to incorrect hours of operation data, leading to significant changes in savings estimates.
4.2.3 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. All EUL values establish...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for electrical energy savings during the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities. It confirms that EUL values from the 2020 evaluation remain valid for the 2021 evaluation and outlines how these values are applied to calculate gross and net lifetime energy savings.
Table 11: 2021 Mail-in Equivalent EUL Values by Lighting Product Product Tracked Equivalent EUL [years] Evaluated Equivalent EUL [years] LED Linear Fixtures 1 x 4 Luminaires 11.6 No change 2 x 2 Luminaires and Retrofit Kits 11.6 No change...
AI summary Table 11 and Table 12 present 2021 Mail-in Equivalent EUL (Energy Use Life) values for various lighting and non-lighting products. Most products show no change in their evaluated EUL values compared to tracked values, with specific recommendations for reviewing horticultural lighting in 2022.
Product Tracked Equivalent EUL [years] Evaluated Equivalent EUL [years] HVAC Air-source Heat Pumps Greater Than or Equal to 65,000 BTU/hr 15 No change Air-source Heat Pumps Less Than 65,000 Btu/hr (excluding air-to-water) 18 No change Air-...
AI summary The document presents a table comparing tracked and evaluated equivalent useful life (EUL) years for various energy-efficient products and technologies. The table shows that in most cases, the evaluated EUL years remain unchanged from the tracked EUL years, indicating no significant adjustments in the estimated lifespans of these products.
The savings achieved for each Mail-in measure category are presented in [Table](#page-56-0) 13 below. Both energy and peak demand savings were revised by applying the adjustment ratios discussed in Subsection [4.2.1](#page-48-3) above. The...
AI summary The document discusses energy and peak demand savings from Mail-in measure categories, using line loss factors and data from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. The total energy and peak demand savings at the generator are 16.366 GWh and 2.433 MW, with lifetime energy savings of 258.596 GWh and a weighted average EUL of 15.8 years.
Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use attributable specifically to Mail-in. Net savings were estimated by applying the above NTGRs to the evaluated gross savings, as illustrated in the following equation. Net Savings = Evalu...
AI summary The document calculates net savings for Mail-in by applying NTGRs to gross savings, resulting in 12.111 GWh of energy savings and 1.800 MW of peak demand savings. The net lifetime energy savings are 191.361 GWh, with a weighted average EUL value of 15.8 years for gross energy savings.
5.2.3 Peak Demand Savings As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator established a PCF of 71% for indoor lighting measures. This percentage is an average of the results from 2019 Mail-in and SBES on-site visits....
AI summary The Evaluator established a PCF of 71% for indoor lighting measures based on data from 2019 Mail-in and SBES on-site visits. Outdoor measures and circulator pumps retained a 100% PCF due to 24-hour usage, while booster pumps were updated to a 70% PCF based on data from eight Custom Retrofit projects.
7.1.1 Market Shares of Lamp Technologies The BNI lamp market is comprised of six main technologies: Incandescent, halogen, Compact Fluorescent Light (CFLs), high intensity discharge (HID), LEDs, and fluorescent. As in the 2017 to 2019 eval...
AI summary The BNI lamp market in Atlantic Canada saw a significant contraction of nearly 46% between 2018 and 2020, with LED shipments declining by 53%. Factors such as the maturity of the LED market, longer product life, and a shift to integrated lamps may have contributed to the decline. Supply chain issues from the COVID-19 pandemic also impacted shipments in 2021.
7.1.2 Market Shares of LED Fixture Types As with LED lamps, the Evaluator relied on secondary data available for 2018 to 2020 from Electro-Federation Canada and data from Instant Rebates to understand the state of the Nova Scotia LED fixtu...
AI summary The document discusses the market share of LED fixture types in Nova Scotia between 2018 and 2020. Despite a decline in the overall industrial fixtures market, LED fixtures grew in share, reaching 92% of total shipments in 2020. The market was split roughly between outdoor and indoor fixtures, with outdoor fixtures making up 56%.
Table 31: Overall 2021 Efficient Product Rebates Participation and Evaluated Savings Participati ion Level Gross Sa Gross Savings Net Sav ings Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit Mail-in Energy Savings 16.366 GWh 0.74 12.111 GWh Lifetim...
AI summary Table 31 presents participation and savings data for the 2021 Efficient Product Rebates program. The program aimed to achieve 35.681 GWh in net energy savings and 7.236 MW in peak demand savings but fell short, achieving 33.491 GWh and 5.401 MW respectively. Instant Rebates was the primary contributor to these savings.
ASK IF OUTDOOR LED FIXTURES WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM I have a few questions about your sales of Outdoor LED fixtures that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. This category includes the following measures (as define...
AI summary The document inquires about the sales of outdoor LED fixtures under the Business Energy Rebates Program, including the number sold, the impact of the program on sales, and the influence of incentives on customer choices. It also asks about potential changes in sales trends and competitor activity.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 Instant Rebates Data Field Completeness and Accuracy – Lighting Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each...
AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of data fields related to 2021 instant rebates for lighting. Issues were identified with wattage baseline, hours of operation, and energy savings calculations, which were corrected based on 2020 evaluation standards.
Table 39: Evaluated 2021 EMIS Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings 82 Table 40: Evaluated 2021 EMIS GHG Emission Reductions83 Table 41: Comparison of 2021 EMIS Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator84 Table 42: Implementation Statu...
AI summary The text presents a list of tables and figures from a regulatory proceeding document, focusing on energy management and efficiency programs. Tables evaluate energy savings, GHG emissions, and program implementation status, while figures illustrate program performance, participant satisfaction, and participation trends over time.
Table 2: Overall 2021 Custom Incentives Participation and Savings Participation Le Gross Savings NTGR NTGR Net Savin Value Unit Value Unit Value Value Unit Custom Energy Savings 5 26.729 GWh 0.87 23.293 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 102 Proj...
AI summary Table 2 summarizes the performance of the 2021 Custom Incentives program, which aimed to achieve 33.610 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 8.476 MW in net peak demand savings. However, the program achieved only 25.165 GWh in energy savings and 6.390 MW in peak demand savings, falling short of its targets. Custom incentives were the largest contributor to the program's outcomes.
9_Figure_4.jpeg) 2021 SEM-Finding: The savings measurement approaches are now more diversified, and an increasing proportion of participants use a bottom-up approach. The Evaluator noted that only two of the six participants used a whole-f...
AI summary The 2021 SEM-Finding highlights that savings measurement approaches are more diversified, with an increasing use of bottom-up methods. However, the Evaluator is concerned that this approach may lead to missed opportunities for continuous monitoring and operational improvements, resulting in lower overall savings.
4.2.1 Project Review Findings Three organizations participated in the pilot. Given this small number and a desire for more detailed results to inform the pilot, the Evaluator presents anonymized evaluation results by project in the remaind...
AI summary Three organizations participated in a pilot project involving energy efficiency measures in institutional and municipal buildings. Two projects had no capital costs, while the third involved significant costs for system upgrades. The Evaluator confirmed that the projects were implemented as stated.
6.2.4 Effective Useful Life The Evaluator reviewed the EUL values of all sampled projects by selecting an appropriate EUL for each measure implemented. The revised measure-level EULs were selected based on the values outlined in the 2020-2...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and adjusted the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for energy efficiency measures in Retrofit and Pay-for-Performance (P4P) projects. Adjustments were made based on the contribution of each measure to energy savings, with solar PV systems revised to a 25-year EUL and P4P projects adjusted using a weighted average method, resulting in a revised EUL of 6.6 years for the group.
[Table](#page-52-0) 18 below presents the evaluated gross savings for Retrofit, which were obtained by applying the overall adjustment ratios for energy savings and peak demand savings as well as the true-up adjustments to the final saving...
AI summary The document presents evaluated gross savings for Retrofit projects in 2021, calculated using line loss factors from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update. The savings at the generator were 14.570 GWh for energy and 3.007 MW for peak demand, with lifetime energy savings totaling 179.288 GWh.
Table 20: Evaluated 2021 Retrofit Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Partial Savings Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2021 Final Savings for Multiyear Projects (Regular) Final Savings for Multiyear Projects (P4P) Total Energy Sa...
AI summary Table 20 evaluates the 2021 retrofit net energy and peak demand savings, providing detailed breakdowns of gross and net energy savings, true-up adjustments, and lifetime energy savings. It also includes peak demand savings and line loss factors for different project types.
Table 22: Comparison of 2021 Retrofit Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value 14.680 GWh 0.82 12.038 GWh 14.570 GWh 0.88 12.821 GWh 107% 2.790 MW 0.82...
AI summary Table 22 compares 2021 retrofit tracked and evaluated savings at the generator level, including gross and net savings in GWh and MW, along with realization rates. The data includes values adjusted due to true-up adjustments and different NTGRs applied to sample strata, as referenced in Subsection 6.3.3.
Table 24: EOne Influence Factors on Building Design Influence Factors Details Incentive for implementation › All respondents indicated that the implementation incentive is critical in participants' decision to design better-than-code build...
AI summary The table outlines the influence factors of EOne on building design, emphasizing the importance of implementation incentives, energy modeling, technical and non-technical assistance, on-site energy managers, and promotion of energy efficiency in Nova Scotia.
9 NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2021 New Construction impact evaluation was to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. Unlike Retrofit, New Construction currently claims only one type of...
AI summary The 2021 New Construction impact evaluation aimed to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, with New Construction claiming only final savings, unlike Retrofit.
9.2 Gross Savings This subsection describes the methodology used by the Evaluator to review the gross savings of New Construction projects. For New Construction, gross savings are calculated based on energy models developed with building e...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used to evaluate gross savings for New Construction projects. It involves comparing energy models of baseline and proposed building designs, with the baseline following the National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) and EOne guidelines.
9.2.2 Project Review Findings The 12 project reviews were aimed at validating the energy models developed for the reference and proposed cases of each project and the resulting savings. The Evaluator based its review mainly on the project...
AI summary The project reviews validated energy models for 12 projects, confirming measure installations and input data. Project files were more complete and well-documented in 2021, reducing the need for in-person visits. The Evaluator used eQuest and other software for modeling and found that Program Guide requirements were better followed.
Energy Savings Positive or negative adjustments were made to the tracked gross energy savings of the 12 projects reviewed by the Evaluator for 2021, with some of the adjustments being minor. One large project was reviewed separately due to...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed 12 energy efficiency projects in 2021, making adjustments to their gross energy savings. One project had a significant adjustment ratio of 0.650 due to baseline exemptions and modeling changes. Other projects had an average adjustment ratio of 0.884. Adjustments were made for operating schedules, COP values, and baseline model requirements, including recommendations for future arena projects.
Peak Demand Savings To establish evaluated peak demand savings, the Evaluator averaged the monthly peak demand reductions calculated in the revised energy models for the months of December, January, and February. The differences between tr...
AI summary To evaluate peak demand savings, the Evaluator used revised energy models and averaged monthly peak demand reductions for December, January, and February. Adjustments to the models, such as removing lighting energy savings, led to an average adjustment ratio of 0.954 for gross peak demand savings, with a margin of error of 14.8%. A separate large project had an adjustment ratio of 0.551.
9.2.3 Energy Interactive Effects Since New Construction savings are based on the results of simulation models that comprise the total electricity consumption of both proposed and reference buildings, interactive effects are already include...
AI summary The text explains that energy savings from new construction are calculated using simulation models that account for the total electricity consumption of both proposed and reference buildings, meaning interactive effects are already included and no additional factor was applied.
9.2.4 Effective Useful Life The Evaluator reviewed the EUL values of each project in the sample by calculating a weighted average EUL value based on measure-specific EULs and their associated annual energy savings. The revised measure-leve...
AI summary The Evaluator adjusted effective useful life (EUL) values for projects in the sample, based on measure-specific EULs and energy savings. Adjustments included aligning EULs with defined categories and correcting inconsistencies in the tracking sheet.
9.2.5 Evaluated Gross Savings The 2021 gross energy and peak demand savings calculated for New Construction are presented in [Table](#page-73-2) 25 below. They were obtained by applying the average adjustment ratios of 0.884 on energy savi...
AI summary The 2021 gross energy and peak demand savings for New Construction are calculated with average adjustment ratios of 0.884 and 0.954, respectively, except for a large project with different ratios. The overall adjustments were 0.839 for energy and 0.898 for peak demand. Savings at the generator were calculated using line loss factors provided by NS Power, resulting in 11.218 GWh energy savings and 3.394 MW peak demand savings.
Table 25: Evaluated 2021 New Construction Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2021 Number of Projects 21 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 12.529 Adjustment Ratio...
AI summary Table 25 presents the evaluated 2021 new construction gross energy and peak demand savings, including metrics like tracked energy savings, adjustment ratios, and line loss factors, as well as lifetime energy savings and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
For New Construction, total net electrical energy and peak demand savings amounted to 9.535 GWh and 2.885 MW respectively at the generator. Net lifetime energy savings were established at 178.500 GWh, which yields a weighted average EUL of...
AI summary The text reports on energy savings from new construction, detailing total net electrical energy savings of 9.535 GWh and peak demand savings of 2.885 MW. Net lifetime energy savings are calculated at 178.500 GWh, with a weighted average EUL of 18.7 years.
Table 27: Evaluated 2021 New Construction Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2021 Number of Projects 21 Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 10.514 NTGR 0.85 Net Energy Saving...
AI summary Table 27 presents the evaluated 2021 new construction net energy and peak demand savings, including gross and net energy savings at the meter and generator, line loss factors, and net lifetime energy savings over an effective useful life of 18.7 years.
2021 New Construction Impact Evaluation Highlights - › New Construction achieved 9.535 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.885 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2021. - › Project reviews resulted in overall adjustmen...
AI summary In 2021, new construction in Nova Scotia achieved significant energy and peak demand savings. The evaluation highlights 9.535 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.885 MW in net peak demand savings. Adjustment ratios for energy and peak demand savings were 0.839 and 0.898, respectively. The evaluated savings were higher than those tracked by EOne due to the higher NTGR.
11.2.3 Effective Useful Life The Evaluator validated the EUL values based on the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment. The EUL values are used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. The Evaluator re...
AI summary The Evaluator validated EUL values based on the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment and adjusted one project's EUL from five to three years, citing the implementation of modified scheduling control parameters in the central building automation system.
Table 30: Evaluated 2021 Building Optimization Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Started and Completed in 2021 Number of Projects 6 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.494 Adjust...
AI summary Table 30 provides an evaluation of 2021 Building Optimization Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings, including metrics such as energy savings, adjustment ratios, and lifetime energy savings. The table indicates that six projects were completed, resulting in 0.462 GWh of gross energy savings at the meter and zero peak demand savings.
11.3.4 Evaluated Net Savings Net savings represent the savings that can be reliably attributed to a service. For Building Optimization, net savings are calculated by applying the NTGR value in the following equation: Net Savings = Gross Sa...
AI summary Net savings for Building Optimization are calculated using the NTGR value, with 2021 net energy savings estimated at 0.444 GWh at the generator, representing 1.332 GWh in lifetime net energy savings and a weighted average EUL of 3.0 years.
Table 32: Evaluated 2021 Building Optimization Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings Final Savings for Projects Fully Claimed in 2021 Energy Savings Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.462 NTGR 0.905 Net Energy Savings Without True-up...
AI summary Table 32 presents evaluated 2021 Building Optimization Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings. The table shows energy savings at the meter and generator, as well as peak demand savings, with a focus on net energy savings and their impact on avoided CO2 emissions.
Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value Energy Savings Tracked Savings by EOne 0.525 GWh 0.81 0.426 GWh Evaluation Results 0.491 GWh 0.91 0.444 GWh 104% Peak Demand Savings Tracked Savings by EOne...
AI summary The table presents energy and peak demand savings tracked and evaluated by EOne, including gross and net savings values and realization rates. The section highlights the 2021 Building Optimization Impact Evaluation results.
2021 OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot Finding: M&V methodologies for peak reduction projects can be further refined. One of the three projects required the Evaluator to change the M&V methodology, which led to a reduction in evaluated...
AI summary The 2021 OEM Operational Demand Savings Pilot found that M&V methodologies for peak reduction projects need refinement. Whole building approaches are not suitable for small projects, and system-level methods are more appropriate. The Evaluator recommends improved M&V protocols and guidance for future operational demand programs, including handling load-shifting projects and ensuring savings are well outside margin of error.
14.1 EMIS Description EMIS offers incentives in the form of incentives or zero-percent on-bill financing to help facilities reduce their electricity consumption through the implementation of an energy management information system. EMIS as...
AI summary EMIS provides incentives and zero-percent on-bill financing to help industrial businesses and institutions reduce electricity consumption through energy management information systems. Participants must sign a letter of intent with EOne, undergo an audit, develop an implementation plan, and install metering equipment. EMIS also offers ongoing support and can be combined with Strategic Energy Management (SEM). The program aimed for 0.300 GWh in net electricity savings in 2021.
EUL Update As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment 29 activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values for all measure categories to ensure they were still valid and revised them where appropriate.
AI summary As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment, the Evaluator reviewed and revised EUL values for all measure categories to ensure their validity.
Calculations Using Evaluation Results Building on all the above methods and collected data, the Evaluator calculated the first-year and lifetime gross energy and peak demand savings as per the calculation methodology presented in Section [...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated first-year and lifetime gross energy and peak demand savings using the methodology outlined in Section 16, based on collected data and previous methods.
GHG Emission Reduction Calculations To obtain net avoided GHG emissions in CO 2 eq for EMIS, the Evaluator multiplied the net energy savings by the latest Nova Scotia-specific factor for GHG emissions generated by electricity production. T...
AI summary The document discusses how net avoided GHG emissions for EMIS are calculated by multiplying net energy savings by Nova Scotia-specific GHG emission factors from NS Power. It also references the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment, which provides parameters for calculating energy and peak demand savings from EOne's DSM program portfolio.
16.3.2 Interactive Effects Since savings were calculated based on a facility-wide electricity consumption model, all interactive effects were already included in the savings calculations.
AI summary The savings calculations in the facility-wide electricity consumption model already account for interactive effects, meaning no additional adjustments are required for these effects.
16.3.3 Effective Useful Life The EUL for the EMIS participant is based on the remaining time in the program and a decay rate of 50% per year after the end of program engagement. This participant was in their fourth year of SEM participatio...
AI summary The Effective Useful Life (EUL) for the EMIS participant is calculated based on their remaining time in the program and a 50% annual decay rate after program engagement. The participant was in their fourth year of SEM participation, and the Evaluator assumed one year of continued participation and one year of post-program participation, resulting in a two-year EUL.
16.3.4 Evaluated Gross Savings EMIS gross incremental energy and peak demand savings are listed in [Table](#page-102-1) 39 below. Gross incremental energy savings at the generator were established at 0.027 GWh while gross peak demand savin...
AI summary The document discusses evaluated gross savings from EMIS, including energy and peak demand savings at the generator level. It mentions the use of line loss factors from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update to estimate these savings, with a calculated EUL of two years.
A comparison of the energy and peak demand savings values established through this evaluation and those tracked by EOne is presented in [Table](#page-104-0) 41. The realization rate, representing the ratio of evaluated net savings to track...
AI summary The evaluation shows a 100% realization rate for both energy and peak demand savings compared to EOne's tracked values. Data on Nova Scotia Power's emissions and electricity generation were sourced from 2020 reports, with 2021 data not yet available.
Table 41: Comparison of 2021 EMIS Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value Energy Savings Tracked Savings by EOne 0.027 GWh 1.00 0.027 GWh Evaluation R...
AI summary Table 41 compares 2021 EMIS tracked and evaluated savings at the generator level. Both energy and peak demand savings show 100% realization rates, indicating that the savings tracked by EOne align perfectly with the evaluation results.
18.1 SEM Description SEM provides industrial and institutional participants with funding and support to implement energy management practices within their organizations. SEM helps participants achieve continuous energy savings by offering...
AI summary The Smart Energy Management (SEM) program supports industrial and institutional participants in implementing energy management practices. It provides funding, structured approaches, and tools to achieve continuous energy savings. Participants must commit to 12 months of participation and can extend for a second year. SEM also offers energy audits, training, and tools for performance monitoring and reporting.
Figure 17: 2021 SEM Participation Process Summary Eligibility Check, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and Kick-off Meeting - Once approved, eligible participants must first sign a MOU that outlines the project scope, participant requirem...
AI summary The 2021 SEM Participation Process Summary outlines the steps for eligibility, data collection, energy modeling, and the establishment of energy teams and policies. It also discusses performance-based incentives for energy savings, with different rates for participants in the Large Industrial initiative versus others. SEM aimed to generate 3.00 GWh of net electrical energy savings and 0.310 MW of peak demand savings in 2020.
EUL Update The Evaluator reconsidered the EUL values used for SEM participants in light of the types of measures implemented by participants in 2021. Where appropriate, an EUL value was selected from the values presented in the 2020-2022 M...
AI summary The Evaluator updated the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for Smart Energy Management (SEM) participants based on the types of measures implemented in 2021, using values from the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment where appropriate and retaining the previous methodology otherwise.
Calculations Using Evaluation Results Building on all the above methods and collected data, the Evaluator calculated the first-year and lifetime gross energy and peak demand savings as per the calculation methodology presented in Section [...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated first-year and lifetime gross energy and peak demand savings using the methodology outlined in Section 20, based on collected data and various methods.
20 SEM IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2021 SEM impact evaluation is to determine project gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. The various terms related to the SEM impact evaluation are defined in the EMIS sectio...
AI summary The 2021 SEM impact evaluation aims to assess project gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. Definitions related to the evaluation are outlined in the EMIS section of the report, which applies to both program components.
EOne applied a peak coincidence factor (PCF) of zero when the measure indeed operated during the peak demand period. These two adjustments resulted in a 163% realization rate for peak demand savings. The Evaluator noted that, for 2021, few...
AI summary EOne used a peak coincidence factor of zero during peak demand periods, resulting in a 163% realization rate for peak demand savings. The Evaluator noted that in 2021, fewer participants used whole-facility energy models (top-down approach), with most using measure-specific M&V (bottom-up approach). Reference protocols recommend limiting bottom-up approaches unless whole-facility models are not feasible.
20.2.3 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values for all measure categories to ensure they were still valid and revised them where appropriate. In previous years, EU...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for measure categories in the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment. For participants using a bottom-up approach, EUL was assigned based on measure-specific estimates, resulting in a 6.2-year average. For participants using whole-facility models, an EUL of two years was assumed, leading to an overall weighted average of 5.6 years for all SEM participants.
20.2.4 Evaluated Gross Savings The 2021 evaluated SEM gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are listed in [Table](#page-116-1) 44 below. Gross incremental energy and peak demand savings at the generator were established at...
AI summary The 2021 evaluated SEM gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator are listed in Table 44, with 1.845 GWh and 0.282 MW respectively. Lifetime energy savings amounted to 10.402 GWh, resulting in an average equivalent EUL of 5.6 years. These savings were estimated using line loss factors from the 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update.
A comparison of the energy and peak demand savings values established through this evaluation and those tracked by EOne is presented in [Table](#page-118-0) 46 below. The realization rate, representing the ratio of evaluated net savings to...
AI summary This text compares energy and peak demand savings values from an evaluation with those tracked by EOne, noting a 99% realization rate for energy savings and 164% for peak demand savings. It also references Nova Scotia Power's 2020 emissions data and electricity generation figures from multiple sources.
Table 46: Comparison of 2021 SEM Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Realization Rate Value Unit Value Value Unit Value Energy Savings Tracked Savings by EOne 1.859 GWh 1.00 1.859 GWh Evaluation Re...
AI summary Table 46 compares 2021 SEM tracked and evaluated savings at the generator. Tracked energy savings by EOne were 1.859 GWh, while evaluated savings were 1.845 GWh, a 1% difference due to deductions from two projects. Peak demand savings were also evaluated at 164% of tracked values.
2021 SEM-Finding: The savings measurement approaches are now more diversified, and an increasing proportion of participants use a bottom-up approach. The Evaluator noted that only two of the six participants used a whole-facility energy mo...
AI summary The 2021 SEM-Finding highlights that savings measurement approaches are more diversified, with an increasing use of bottom-up methods. The Evaluator expressed concerns that bottom-up approaches may miss operational and behavioral improvements, leading to fewer overall savings. Guidelines for bottom-up approaches are recommended to align with program objectives and ensure consistency with energy management strategies.
2021 SEM-Finding: Applying a different methodology for estimating EUL values resulted in higher EUL values for SEM. For participants using a whole-facility model, the Evaluator estimated the EUL based on the remaining time in the program a...
AI summary The 2021 SEM-Finding discusses the change in methodology for estimating Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for Smart Energy Management (SEM) projects. A new approach, based on measure-specific EULs, resulted in higher estimates (6.2 years) compared to the previous method (approximately 3 years). The old method was still considered appropriate for behavioural measures where savings are hard to estimate precisely.
Table 3: Verification of 2021 Custom Savings Compilation Program Component Result Valid Equation (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Gross Energy Savings at the Generator Y N/A Gross Peak Demand Savings at the Generator Y N/A Net E...
AI summary Table 3 verifies the 2021 Custom Savings Compilation, confirming that all program component results related to energy and peak demand savings at the generator level are valid with no corrective actions required by the evaluator.
costs, and tradespeople availability. For each sub-question : Score : 98) DK/Refuse G2. We understand that your organization availed itself of the services of an Onsite Energy Manager during the time that this project was being considered...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions related to the involvement of an Onsite Energy Manager (OEM) in a project and the importance of their contributions to the decision-making process for implementing energy efficiency measures through a Custom Retrofit or Building Optimization program.
COVID Impact for Measure #1 Include notes on how calculated savings are impacted by COVID, if so. Detail any adjustment, along with the rational, needed to bring back the savings to a typical year. 10 .Has this measure been impacted by COV...
AI summary The document outlines a table and notes for assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on energy efficiency measures, including questions about occupancy, production schedules, baseline periods, and adjustments to savings calculations. It also covers peak demand savings and interactive effects related to heating and cooling systems.
1. Results General Overview - › Check savings (in %) for each end use and identify where the major savings lie. Crosscheck with the energy efficiency measure list to validate if the savings claimed make sense. - › Verify GJ/m2 and check be...
AI summary The overview discusses verifying energy savings percentages across end uses and validating them against energy efficiency measures. It also emphasizes checking energy intensity metrics (GJ/m2) and benchmarking data to ensure consistency, noting that building differences (e.g., underground parking) can affect energy usage comparisons.
4. Loads and Schedules - › Validate occupancy and plug-load values according to NECB. - › Validate lighting loads by spot-checking installed lighting power in random rooms vs. electrical plans and shop drawings. - › Validate domestic hot w...
AI summary The document outlines procedures to validate occupancy, plug-load, lighting, and domestic hot water (DHW) loads in buildings, referencing NECB guidelines and EfficiencyOne's DHW consumption values. It also emphasizes the need to ensure that schedules used are typical for the building type being modeled.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 EMIS Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Participan...
AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 EMIS data fields, focusing on energy savings, peak demand savings, rate class, and net-to-gross ratios. It notes that the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of 3 years is uniformly applied, though it will be reviewed individually for each participant.
Table 2: Verification of 2021 EMIS Data Field Consistency Data Field 1 Data Field 2 Consistent (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Calculated Line Loss Factor (Gross Energy Savings at the Generator / Gross Energy Savings at the Met...
AI summary This table verifies the consistency of 2021 EMIS data fields, including the calculated line loss factor, gross energy savings, and verification of duplicate project IDs. All fields are marked as consistent.
Table 4 presents the corrected tracked savings, which were identical to the values tracked by EOne.
AI summary Table 4 presents corrected tracked savings, which are identical to the values tracked by EOne. The table is accompanied by an image reference.
Table 4: 2021 EMIS Corrected Tracked Savings Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Relative Program Component Result Value Unit Value Unit Difference Gross Energy Savings at the Generator 0.027 GWh 0.027 GWh 0% Gross Peak Demand Savings...
AI summary Table 4 presents the 2021 EMIS corrected tracked savings for various program components, showing no discrepancies in tracked values and no changes made by the Evaluator.
Data Accuracy Table 1 lists all the parameters required for the SEM evaluation. The Evaluator validated whether the data contained in the tracking sheet submitted by EOne were accurate based on previous evaluation results as well as whethe...
AI summary The document discusses the validation of data accuracy in the SEM evaluation, focusing on the parameters listed in Table 1 and the actions taken by the Evaluator to adjust data as needed based on previous results and completeness checks.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 SEM Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Data for Each Project or Participant...
AI summary This table verifies the completeness and accuracy of 2021 SEM data fields, particularly focusing on energy and peak demand savings, rate class, and net-to-gross ratios. It notes inconsistencies in the effective useful life (EUL) application and plans for a review as part of the impact evaluation.
Table 2: Verification of 2021 SEM Data Field Consistency Data Field 1 Data Field 2 Consistent (Y/N) If Not, Action Taken by the Evaluator Calculated Line Loss Factor (Gross Energy Savings at the Generator / Gross Energy Savings at the Mete...
AI summary Table 2 verifies the consistency of 2021 SEM data fields, including Calculated Line Loss Factor, Gross Energy Savings, and duplicate project verification. The table indicates all data fields are consistent, with no actions taken by the evaluator.
Table 4 presents the corrected tracked savings, which were identical to the values tracked by EOne.
AI summary Table 4 shows corrected tracked savings that are the same as the values tracked by EOne, indicating no changes in the savings data after correction.
4. SEM Management SEM MANAGEMENT NOTES Were all activities held according to the Event Log? Annual Reduction Target? (Y/N) Percent Target Reduction (%) Did you Meet the Reduction Target(s)? (Y/N) If Not, Can You Explain Why? Who Is Respons...
AI summary The document includes a table with questions related to SEM Management, including topics such as event logs, reduction targets, responsibility for managing the M&T, review frequency, handling variations, communication of results, and the capability of the energy team to update and interpret energy models without support from the SEM service provider.
COVID Did Covid had an impact on the implemented measures? Are the savings calculations impacted by Covid? Were any adjusments made by the SP regarding Covid? Are the reported savings based on a typical year? IMPACT EVALUATION NOTES Projec...
AI summary The text discusses impact evaluation and savings adjustments related to energy efficiency measures, focusing on baseline and reporting periods, regression equations, and adjustments for factors other than the energy conservation measure (ECM). It includes questions about the impact of COVID-19 on savings calculations and the adequacy of models used for evaluation.
Table 2: 2021 SEM Peak Demand Savings Adjustments Project Tracked Savings (kW) Evaluated Savings (kW) Adjustment Ratio Explanation for Adjustment 1 29.2 28.6 97.8% The reduction to the energy savings resulted in a proportional reduction of...
AI summary Table 2 details 2021 SEM Peak Demand Savings Adjustments for various projects, showing discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings. Adjustments are due to incorrect assumptions, removal of measures, and timing issues in claiming savings. Some projects had no adjustments, while others had significant reductions or corrections.
1.2 Follow-up on Past Evaluation Report Recommendations No major improvement recommendations were made for SBES in 2020.
AI summary No major improvement recommendations were made for the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2020, as noted in the evaluation report.
2 SBES EVALUATION APPROACH The 2021 SBES evaluation consisted of a condensed impact evaluation. The objectives of the 2021 SBES evaluation were to calculate gross and net SBES results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savin...
AI summary The 2021 SBES evaluation focused on calculating gross and net results, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions. Research questions and methods were identified to achieve these objectives.
Tracking Sheet Audit Prior to performing the savings calculation review, the Evaluator performed an audit of the final 2021 tracking sheet to ensure it was complete and the entered data were consistent. The detailed protocol used for the t...
AI summary An audit of the final 2021 tracking sheet was conducted to ensure completeness and data consistency prior to a savings calculation review. The audit protocol and results are detailed in Appendix III. First-year savings estimates are based on typical energy consumption and do not account for pandemic-related changes.
4.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants regardless of their reasons for participating. 6 For each SBES Audit or DIY project, EOne calculates gross savings...
AI summary Gross savings refer to energy consumption changes due to participant actions. In 2021, lighting measures made up 99% of implemented SBES measures and contributed 82% of total savings. Calculations are done using the CIRx Screening Tool or custom methods.
4.2.5 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used in the calculation of electrical energy savings that are expected to persist over time. Most of the EUL values e...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and updated Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for lighting measures as part of the 2020-2022 Measure Assessment activities. Most EUL values from the 2020 evaluation remained valid for 2021, with updates made for measures affected by upcoming regulations and new measures added.
Table 7: 2021 SBES Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values by Lighting Product Tracked Evaluated Product Equivalent EUL Equivalent EUL [years] [years] LED Linear Fixtures 1 x 4 Luminaires 11.6 No change 2 x 2 Luminaires and Retrofit Kits 1...
AI summary Table 7 presents the 2021 SBES Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various lighting products, showing the equivalent EUL in years for different types of LED and other lighting fixtures, with some values remaining unchanged from previous years.
Table 8: 2021 SBES Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values by Non-lighting Product Product Tracked Equivalent EUL [years] Evaluated Equivalent EUL [years] Server-based Power Management Software 5 No change Server Virtualization and Decommi...
AI summary Table 8 outlines the 2021 SBES Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various non-lighting products, showing that most products have no change in their EUL values from the tracked to evaluated periods.
4.2.6 Evaluated Gross Savings Total gross energy and peak demand savings at the generator were respectively 0.190 GWh and 0.034 MW for the Audit path, 10.643 GWh and 2.321 MW for the DIY path, and 0.272 GWh and 0.043 MW for the Commercial...
AI summary The document provides evaluated gross savings for different energy efficiency programs, including the Audit path, DIY path, and Commercial Direct Instal (CDI) pilot, with specific figures for energy and peak demand savings at the generator. Line loss factors were applied to calculate savings, referencing a 2014 Cost of Service Study Progress Update submitted to the NSUARB.
Table 9: Evaluated 2021 SBES Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings – Audit Path Measure Category DHW HVAC Lighting Motors Pumping Refrigeration Compressed Air Total for All Categories Energy Savings – Gross Energy Savings Before Adjustment...
AI summary Table 9 presents evaluated 2021 SBES gross energy and peak demand savings, including adjustments for line loss and energy savings at the meter and generator levels. It also includes effective useful life and lifetime energy savings for various measure categories.
Table 10: Evaluated 2021 SBES Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings – DIY Path Measure Category Commercial Kitchens Envelopes HVAC Laundry Lighting Custom Refrigeration Renewable Generation Agriculture Total for All Categories Energy Saving...
AI summary Table 10 presents evaluated 2021 SBES gross energy and peak demand savings across various categories, including Commercial Kitchens, Envelopes, HVAC, and others, with data on energy savings, adjustment ratios, line loss factors, and lifetime energy savings.
Table 11: Evaluated 2021 SBES Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings – CDI Pilot Measure Category Lighting Water Heating Total for All Categories Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.067 0.038 0.105 Adjustment R...
AI summary Table 11 presents evaluated 2021 SBES gross energy and peak demand savings from the CDI Pilot, detailing energy savings across lighting and water heating categories, including adjustments, line loss factors, and lifetime energy savings at the generator level.
4.3.4 Evaluated Net Savings Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions that are specifically attributable to SBES. Program component net impacts were estimated by applying the above NTGRs to the revised gross savings by using the...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of net savings from the Smart Building Energy Solution (SBES) program, using Net-to-Gross Ratios (NTGRs) applied to revised gross savings. It provides specific figures for energy and peak demand savings under different program paths and highlights the overall performance of the SBES program in 2021.
As presented in Table 16, applying the Nova Scotia-specific factor 10 for GHG emissions generated by electricity prod[uction to](#page-48-1) SBES net savings corresponds to a total of 5,541 tonnes of annually avoided CO 2 eq.
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of annual CO2 equivalent emissions avoided through the application of a Nova Scotia-specific factor to GHG emissions from electricity production, resulting in 5,541 tonnes of annually avoided CO2 eq using the SBES net savings.
APPENDIX III SBES: TRACKING SHEET AUDIT This appendix presents the results of the tracking sheet audit performed by the Evaluator, which was aimed at: - › Verifying that all data fields required for the evaluation were included and properl...
AI summary This appendix outlines the tracking sheet audit conducted by the Evaluator to verify the completeness and accuracy of data submitted by EOne, ensuring consistency in parameters and calculations used for evaluating program results such as energy and peak demand savings.
Table 1: Verification of 2021 SBES Data Field Completeness and Accuracy Data Fields Complete (Y/N/Partial) Consistent with Previous Evaluation If Incomplete or Inconsistent, Action Taken by the Evaluator Interactive Effects Factors N N/A N...
AI summary The table evaluates the completeness and accuracy of 2021 SBES data fields, noting that several key fields such as Interactive Effects Factors, Net-to-gross Ratios, Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios, and Effective Useful Life were incomplete. The evaluator applied assumptions to address these gaps, which had no significant impact on the corrected tracked savings.
Table 7: 2021 SBES Corrected Tracked Savings Program Component Result Value Tracked by EOne Corrected Tracked Value Relative Difference Value Unit Value Unit Value SBES Gross Energy Savings at the Generator 11.099 GWh 10.832 GWh -2.4% Gros...
AI summary Table 7 shows the 2021 SBES corrected tracked savings, revealing a decrease in energy and peak demand savings compared to EOne's tracked values. The Evaluator adjusted the savings by incorporating an adjustment ratio and correcting missing line loss factors, which slightly increased some savings.
Measure Additional Notes Unitary Energy Savings Value Unitary Peak Demand Savings Value EUL Value - (kWh/year) (W) (years) 9.5 W Replacing 100 W 326 53.4 3.5 9.5 W Replacing 150 W 506 82.9 3.2 18 W Replacing 75 W 205 33.6 4.1 18 W Replacin...
AI summary The document presents a table of energy savings measures, including the unitary energy savings value, unitary peak demand savings value, and effective useful life (EUL) value for various lighting and hot water efficiency programs. The data reflects the impact of replacing traditional lighting with more efficient alternatives and reducing hot water usage through flow rate reductions and insulation.
ABBREVIATIONS AHRI Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute ARet Appliance Retirement program ASHP Air-source heat pump ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers BER Business Energy Reba...
AI summary This section provides a list of abbreviations and their full forms, primarily related to energy efficiency, building systems, and regulatory frameworks. It includes terms from industry standards, programs, and organizations relevant to energy management and policy.
Table 51: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Central Air-source Heat Pumps 56 Table 52: Ground-source Heat Pump Measure Summary 57 Table 53: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Ground-source Heat Pumps 58 Table 54: Wood and Pellet St...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables that outline energy savings values for various heating and efficiency measures, including heat pumps, wood and pellet stoves, air sealing kits, and thermostats, providing detailed data on their impact on energy consumption and demand.
Table 98: EPI Smart Power Controller for Audiovisual Equipment Installation Rate 101 Table 99: Power Bars with Integrated Timer Measure Summary 102 Table 100: Electrical Unitary Savings Value for Power Bars with Integrated Timers 103 Table...
AI summary The document contains a series of tables detailing energy efficiency measures, including savings values for various lighting, heating, and water heating technologies. These tables are part of an analysis of energy efficiency programs and their impact on energy consumption and savings.
Table 149: Faucet Aerator Measure Summary 142 Table 150: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Faucet Aerators 143 Table 151: Average Hot Water Usage per Faucet 143 Table 152: SBES Faucet Aerator Installation Rate 144 Table 153: Thermostat...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables summarizing energy efficiency measures, including faucet aerators, thermostatic shower valves, pipe insulation, hot water tank wraps, and LED lighting. These tables include data on energy savings, installation rates, and effective useful life calculations.
Table 1: Measure Assessment Change Log Change Type Section Description Date Update Abbreviation table Update abbreviation table, including adding program component acronyms. 2022-01-25 Update Introduction – Development and Review Process C...
AI summary This document outlines updates and changes to measure assessments, including the addition of new measures and updates to existing ones, such as LED black out bulbs, drain water heat recovery, and adjustments to energy efficiency parameters based on findings and retirements from 2021.
Change Type Section Description Date New measure 3.1 Lighting 3.1.3(1) LED Lamps 3.1.3(7) LED Nightlights 3.4 Water Heating Add measures from SBES Commercial Direct Install pilot. 2022-01-25 Update 3.2.3(2) Booster Pumps Update peak demand...
AI summary The document outlines various updates and new measures related to energy efficiency programs, including the addition of LED lamps, nightlights, and advanced RTU controls, as well as updates to EUL values for lighting and water heating measures. These changes were implemented between 2021 and 2022.
Development and Review Process The savings are established using one or more of the following approaches: literature reviews of technical reference manuals; metering studies and evaluation reports; engineering calculations; adjustments bas...
AI summary The document outlines the process for establishing savings in the DSM program using various methods, including literature reviews and engineering calculations. Parameters used in the 2020 evaluation are generally valid throughout the DSM cycle, except for specific parameters that are updated annually. New measures introduced are reviewed and incorporated into the MA during subsequent evaluations.
Interactive Effects on Air Conditioning The Hydro-Québec study found that efficient lighting installed in homes with air-conditioning units results in an interactive effects factor for cooling of 3.6%. By analyzing the Hydro-Québec study,...
AI summary The Hydro-Québec study found that efficient lighting in homes with air-conditioning units leads to a 3.6% interactive effects factor for cooling. The Evaluator adjusted this figure to 3.1% based on updated air-conditioning efficiency levels, using a formula involving COP and the percentage of conditioned home area.
Table 8: LED Lamp Measure Summary Parameter EPI Instar Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description LED Lamps to reduce e electricity consum nption. Additional Notes A-type, Reflector, and Decorative LED Lamps ENERG...
AI summary Table 8 provides a summary of LED lamp measures, including installation rates, effective useful life, energy savings, and peak demand savings. The table also includes interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings based on home heating and air-conditioning systems.
Table 14: Dimmer Switch Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Dimmer switches to reduce electricity consumption N/A Additional Notes - General Parameters Installation...
AI summary Table 14 provides a summary of the dimmer switch measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, unitary energy savings, and interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings.
Table 16: Motion Sensor Measure Summary Instant Savings Parameter Indoor Motion Sensor Indoor Motion Sensor with Dimmer Switch Outdoor Motion Sensor Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Motion sensors t o re...
AI summary Table 16 summarizes motion sensor measures, including installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings. It provides details on indoor and outdoor motion sensors, their energy consumption reduction, and related parameters such as unitary energy savings and peak demand-to-energy ratios.
Table 17: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Indoor Motion Sensors Parameter Value Source Average Wattage [W] 2 x 43 W = 86 W As per Canadian regulation, the wattage of general- service lamps with a luminous flux in the range of 750 and...
AI summary Table 17 presents electrical unitary savings values for indoor motion sensors, including average wattage, daily hours of operation, reduction in hours of operation, and annual energy savings. These values are derived from Canadian regulations, studies, and calculations.
Table 21: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for LED Nightlights Parameter Value Source Old Wattage [W] 7.0 Assumption based on the typical wattage value of an incandescent nightlight New Wattage [W] 0.3 Wattage value of the LED nightlight...
AI summary Table 21 presents electrical unitary savings values for LED nightlights, comparing old and new wattage, average displaced wattage, hours of operation, and annual energy savings. The table assumes typical usage patterns and provides calculated savings based on the installation of LED nightlights through the EPI program.
Single-family Homes Based on site visit results from the 2015 evaluation 39 and accounting for the proportion of DHW insulation measures installed in conditioned spaces, the average number of months during which heating interactive effects...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of domestic hot water (DHW) insulation measures on heating and cooling loads in single-family homes, noting that heating interactive effects occur for 3.8 months on average. Adjustments are made for homes with heat pump heating systems, using a coefficient of performance (COP) of 2.2 based on federal energy efficiency regulations.
Table 26: Drain Water Heat Recovery Measure Summary Parameter HEA, MHEEP Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Drain water heat recovery for high-efficiency water heating N/A Additional Notes - General Parame...
AI summary Table 26 presents a summary of the Drain Water Heat Recovery Measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, unitary energy savings, and peak demand-to-energy ratio. The table provides detailed information on the measure's energy savings and other relevant parameters.
Table 27: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Drain Water Heat Recovery Systems Parameter HEA, MHEEP Source Number of Persons per Household [person] 2.5 2020 HEA Participant Survey Number of Showers per Person per Day [shower] 0.6...
AI summary Table 27 outlines the electrical unitary energy savings values for Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR) systems. It includes parameters such as the number of showers per household, average shower duration, and shower flow rate. The table also provides the unitary energy savings calculated as 805 kWh/year.
Summary [Table](#page-182-1) 28 presents a summary of the values used to calculate solar domestic hot water (solar DHW) savings. The detailed methodology follows. 43 Mayer, P. W., Oreo W. B. et al., Residential End Uses of Water , publishe...
AI summary Table 28 summarizes the values used to calculate solar domestic hot water (solar DHW) savings, with references to methodologies and sources including studies by Mayer, DeOreo, and the Connecticut Program Savings Document.
The unitary savings for HPWHs are calculated based on the equations below. The savings without the interactive effects parameter ( w o ) is obtained using a weighted average of unitary savings from six studies presented in a paper from the...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation of unitary savings for heat pump water heaters (HPWHs), using equations and parameters from studies and technical references. It incorporates a heating penalty factor (PF) derived from the Efficiency Vermont TRM and adjusts savings based on the conversion of initial heating systems to water heating.
Table 30: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Heat Pump Water Heaters HEA, N IHEEP In stant Savings Parameter Symbol Electric Resistance Space Heating Heat Pump Space Heating Non- Electrical Space Heating Electric Resistance Space Heatin...
AI summary Table 30 presents electrical unitary savings values for heat pump water heaters, including parameters such as coefficient of performance, heating penalty factor, and energy savings in kWh/year. The data is sourced from various studies and calculations, with some values based on tracking sheets and statistical data.
Table 31: Low-flow Showerhead Measure Summary Parameter EPI IS Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Low-flow showerheads to reduce domestic hot water consumption Single-family homes Apartments Additional Not...
AI summary Table 31 summarizes the Low-flow Showerhead Measure, detailing energy savings, installation rates, and performance metrics for different residential categories. It outlines flow rate reductions, energy savings in kWh/year, peak demand savings, and other parameters for both single-family homes and apartments.
Table 34: Faucet Aerator Measure Summary Parameter EPI Reference Measure Description and Ide Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Faucet aerators to red water consumption uce domestic hot N/A Additional Notes Single-f...
AI summary Table 34 summarizes the Faucet Aerator Measure, including installation rates, energy savings, and other parameters. The table provides details on energy and peak demand savings, with references to specific subsections for further information.
Table 37: Thermostatic Shower Valve Measure Summary Parameter EPI Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Thermosta atic shower valves to re duce dome stic hot wat er consump otion Single-fan nily homes Apartme...
AI summary Table 37 provides a summary of the Thermostatic Shower Valve Measure, including parameters like installation rates, energy savings, and peak demand savings. The table outlines details such as flow rates, effective useful life, and energy savings metrics for different home types.
Electrical Unitary Energy Savings The equation below is used to determine the annual unitary savings values for thermostatic shower valves. Energy savings are established by calculating the reduction in domestic hot water usage, as present...
AI summary The document provides equations to calculate annual energy savings from thermostatic shower valves by reducing domestic hot water usage. The equations consider factors like water reduction, efficiency coefficients, and other operational variables.
Table 40: Pipe Insulation Measure Summary Parameter EPI Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Pipe insulation to reduce domestic hot water consumption N/A Additional Notes - Installation Rate Installation Rat...
AI summary Table 40 summarizes the pipe insulation measure, including its description, installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. It outlines key metrics such as unitary energy savings, peak demand-to-energy ratio, and interactive effects factors related to energy and peak demand savings.
Table 43: Hot Water Tank Wrap Measure Summary Parameter EPI Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Hot water tank wrap to reduce domestic hot water consumption N/A Additional Notes Single-family homes Apartmen...
AI summary Table 43 summarizes the energy savings parameters for the hot water tank wrap measure, including unitary energy savings, peak demand savings, and interactive effects factors. The measure is intended for single-family homes and apartments, with an effective useful life of 7 years.
Table 44: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Hot Water Tank Wraps Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Layer 1: Interior Insulation of Tank External Radius of the Layer [m] re 0.300 0.280 Giant73 In...
AI summary Table 44 presents the electrical unitary savings values for hot water tank wraps, detailing parameters such as thermal resistance, heat transfer, and energy savings for single-family homes and apartments. The data includes calculations and sources for various thermal properties and assumptions used in the analysis.
Table 48: Mini-split Heat Pump Measure Summary Parameter Gree n Heat HEA MHEEP Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Mini-split heat pumps for high-effi ciency spa ce heating Additional Notes Fully electrical...
AI summary Table 48 provides a summary of mini-split heat pump measures, including installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. It outlines details such as unitary energy savings, peak demand-to-energy ratio, and interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings.
Table 49: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Mini-split Heat Pumps Variable Symbol Green Heat Source Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump at outdoor air temperature of -15°C [kBTU/h] 𝐻𝐶𝑚𝑖𝑛 Specification data for each installed s...
AI summary The table provides unitary peak demand savings values for mini-split heat pumps, including variables such as heating capacity, coefficient of performance, and conversion factors. Adjustments are made based on performance at different temperatures using simulation software and equations provided by NRCan.
Unitary Peak Demand Savings For CASHPs installed under Green Heat, rated heating capacity and COP at -15°C are not always available. The Evaluator looked into the specification details of CASHPs installed through Green Heat in 2021 and was...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of unitary peak demand savings for CASHPs (Cold Air Source Heat Pumps) installed under the Green Heat program, noting that not all models have rated heating capacity and COP at -15°C. The Evaluator identified parameters for 15 models and used a specific equation to calculate average savings.
Table 51: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Central Air-source Heat Pumps Variable Symbol Value Source Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump at outdoor air temperature of -15°C [BTU/h] 𝐻𝐶𝑚𝑖𝑛 25,976 Average specification data for...
AI summary Table 51 presents unitary peak demand savings values for central air-source heat pumps, including parameters like heating capacity, coefficient of performance, and calculated peak demand savings. The data is sourced from the 2021 Green Heat tracking sheet and conventions.
Table 52: Ground-source Heat Pump Measure Summary Parameter Green Heat HEA Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Ground-source heat pumps for high-efficiency space heating Additional Notes - N/A General Param...
AI summary Table 52 provides a summary of ground-source heat pump measures, including installation rates, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. The table outlines details such as unitary energy savings, peak demand-to-energy ratio, and interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings.
Table 56: Unitary Peak Demand Savings Values for Wood and Pellet Stoves and Fireplace Inserts Green Hea Parameter Wood stove/ Fireplace Insert with electrical baseline Pellet stove/ Fireplace Insert with electrical baseline Wood stove/ Fir...
AI summary Table 56 presents unitary peak demand savings values for different types of wood and pellet stoves and fireplace inserts, with specific values provided for pellet stove/fireplace inserts with an electrical baseline. The data is sourced from a 2013 evaluation using HOT2000 Energy Models.
Summary [Table](#page-14-1) 57 presents a summary of the values used to calculate wood and pellet boiler and furnace savings. The detailed methodology follows.
AI summary Table 57 summarizes the values used to calculate wood and pellet boiler and furnace savings, with a detailed methodology provided in the following text.
Table 57: Wood and Pellet Boiler and Furnace Measure Summary Parameter Green Heat HEA Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description renewable fuel Wood and pellet boilers and furnaces for space heating from Fuel Wood...
AI summary Table 57 summarizes the parameters for the Wood and Pellet Boiler and Furnace Measure under the Green Heat program. It includes details such as installation rates, effective useful life, energy savings, and peak demand savings for both wood and pellet-based systems.
Parameter ARet Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Replacement of old clothes dryers to reduce electricity consumption ENERGY STAR certified clothes dryers to reduce electricity consumption...
AI summary The table outlines the parameters for the Appliance Retirement (ARET) Instant Savings program, including measure descriptions, installation rates, useful life, and energy savings. It provides details on unitary energy savings, peak demand-to-energy ratio, and calculated peak demand savings for replacing old clothes dryers with ENERGY STAR certified models.
The electrical unitary energy savings of the clothes dryer replacement measure are calculated using the equations below. $$Energy \, Savings \, _{kWh} = APDL \times AWL \times ALW \times \left(\frac{1}{CEF_{base}} - \frac{1}{CEF_{new}}\rig...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation method for electrical unitary energy savings from replacing clothes dryers, using formulas involving average proportion of dried loads (APDL), combined energy factor (CEF), and data from ENERGY STAR and Natural Resources Canada reports. It references specific reports and models used for these calculations.
Table 86: Clothes Washer Energy Consumption Parameter Value for Standard Clothes Washer Value for Efficient Clothes Washer Source Number of Loads [Loads/Year] 29 00 Hydro-Québec 130 Capacity [L] 127 Weighted average capacity based on 10 mo...
AI summary The text provides a table comparing energy consumption parameters for standard and efficient clothes washers, including load numbers, capacity, and energy factor. It also introduces a section on water heating adjustment, indicating a potential discussion on energy efficiency and consumption adjustments.
Summary [Table](#page-52-0) 99 presents a summary of the values used to calculate power bar with integrated timer savings. The detailed methodology follows. 137 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Technical Reference Manual, February 2...
AI summary Table 99 outlines the values used to calculate power bar with integrated timer savings. The methodology is detailed in subsequent sections, with references to technical manuals and studies from various organizations.
Summary [Table](#page-53-1) 101 below presents a summary of the values used to calculate heavy-duty outdoor timer savings. The detailed methodology follows.
AI summary A table summarizes the values used to calculate heavy-duty outdoor timer savings, with a detailed methodology provided in the proceeding.
Table 103: ENERGY STAR Certified Pool Pump Measure Summary Parameter Instant Savings Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description ENERGY STAR certified pool pumps to reduce electricity consumption N/A Additional Not...
AI summary This table provides a summary of the ENERGY STAR certified pool pump measure, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, and electrical savings. The measure aims to reduce electricity consumption through the use of energy-efficient pool pumps.
Summary [Table](#page-58-1) 107 presents a summary of the values used to calculate electric thermal storage savings. The detailed methodology follows.
AI summary Table 107 summarizes the values used to calculate electric thermal storage savings, with a detailed methodology provided afterward.
Parameter Value Source Baseline Wattage [W] N/A Based on specification data for each rebated unit. See Table 126 below New Wattage [W] N/A Based on wattage listed in tracking sheet for each rebated unit Hours of Operation [hrs/day] 4,300 A...
AI summary The document outlines parameters for calculating energy savings from LED fixtures, including baseline wattage, new wattage, and hours of operation. It references Table 126 for baseline wattage data and notes that the baseline technology is halogen lamps.
Table 128: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Occupancy/Motion Sensors Parameter Type of Occupancy Sensor Value Source Ceiling or Wall Remote-Mounted 220 Average connected wattage for Connected Wattage (W) Fixture Mounted or Wall Switch...
AI summary The table provides electrical unitary savings values for occupancy/motion sensors, including connected wattage, savings factors, and energy savings calculations. The data is based on installations from 2018 to 2020, with exterior sensors using data from the 2015 Efficiency Vermont TRM.
Table 131: Circulator Pump Measure Summary Parameter BER Instant Reb Reference Measure Description and Ider Measure Description and Identification Measure Description peed electronically M) circulator pumps Additional Notes Max input power...
AI summary Table 131 provides a summary of circulator pump measures, including parameters such as installation rate, effective useful life, energy savings, and peak demand savings. It outlines two categories: BER Instant Reb and Reference, with details on energy efficiency and performance metrics.
The electrical energy unitary savings for circulator pumps are calculated using the equation below and savings data from Vermont adapted to Nova Scotia using each jurisdiction's average operating hours. Although the max input power tiers d...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of electrical energy unitary savings for circulator pumps, using an equation and data adapted from Vermont to Nova Scotia, with EOne's tiers used for savings assumptions due to minimal differences compared to Vermont's TRM tiers.
Table 134: Booster Pump Measure Summary Parameter BER-MI BER-IR Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description High efficiency booster pumps Additional Notes - N/A General Parameters Installation Rate 100% See details...
AI summary Table 134 provides a summary of the Booster Pump Measure, including details such as the measure description, installation rate, effective useful life, and energy savings parameters. The table outlines key metrics like unitary energy savings and peak demand savings, with some values based on assumptions and specifications.
Summary [Table](#page-82-1) 137 presents a summary of the values used to calculate electric thermal storage savings. The detailed methodology follows.
AI summary Table 137 summarizes the values used to calculate electric thermal storage savings, with a detailed methodology provided in the document.
Table 137: Electric Thermal Storage Measure Summary Parameter BER Mail-in SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description Electric thermal storage systems to reduce peak demand space heating load N/A Additional No...
AI summary Table 137 summarizes the Electric Thermal Storage Measure, focusing on parameters such as installation rate, useful life, and energy savings. The table highlights details for BER Mail-in and SBES, including the peak demand-to-energy ratio and unitary peak demand savings.
The electrical unitary energy savings for advanced RTU controls are calculated using the variables defined and listed in the equation below as well as in [Table](#page-85-0) 139 and [Table](#page-86-0) 140 below. $$\begin{split} Energy Sav...
AI summary The text provides a formula for calculating electrical unitary energy savings for advanced RTU controls, referencing specific tables for variable definitions. It includes a mathematical equation and a figure related to the calculation process.
Table 139: Electrical Unitary Savings Values for Advanced RTU Controls Parameter Symbol BER-MI Source Indicator of cooling in the RTU 𝐴𝐶 RTU with AC: 1 RTU without AC: 0 Indicator of electrical heating in the RTU 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 RTU with electric...
AI summary Table 139 outlines electrical unitary savings values for advanced RTU controls, detailing parameters such as cooling and heating indicators, capacities, COP values, and savings calculations. It includes data sources like the Illinois TRM and Canadian historical climate TRM, and provides conversion factors and assumptions for COP values.
Hot Water Insulation Measures For hot water insulation measures, namely pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, the interactive effects factors are based on engineering calculations to account for the duration of the heating and cooling...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects factors for hot water insulation measures, including pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps. It considers the duration of heating and cooling seasons, system efficiency, and heat loss. Adjustments are made for heat pump systems due to their higher efficiency.
Table 141: Interactive Effects Factors for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Space Heating Energy Interactive Effects During Heating Period Energy Interactive Effects During Cooling Period Total Energy Interactive Effects Peak Deman...
AI summary Table 141 presents interactive effects factors for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, showing energy and peak demand impacts during heating and cooling periods for different heating types, such as heat pump and electrical heating.
Table 145: Low-flow Showerhead Measure Summary Parameter SBES Reference Measure Description and Identification Measure Description howerheads consumption to reduce Additional Notes Flow rate reduction of 0.5 gpm 0.75 gpm Flow rate reductio...
AI summary Table 145 presents a summary of energy savings from low-flow showerhead measures, including unitary energy savings, peak demand-to-energy ratio, and installation rates. The table includes various flow rate reductions and calculations based on assumptions and subsections of the document.
Table 146: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Low-flow Showerheads Parameter Symbol SBES Source Proportion of Water Heating Supplied by Electric Resistance Heating %ElectricDHW 100% Electrical energy savings will only be claimed...
AI summary Table 146 provides electrical unitary energy savings values for low-flow showerheads, including parameters like baseline and low-flow rates, energy efficiency, and calculations for annual energy savings. The table includes data sources and conversion factors used in the calculations.
Table 147: Average Showerhead Usage Building Type Annual Minutes per Showerhead (SHtime) Weight Source Hospitality 3,509 86% Health 2,528 0% Annual minutes per Education 2,057 0% showerhead: Iowa Energy Efficiency TRM – 2021 Commercial - E...
AI summary Table 147 provides average annual showerhead usage across different building types in Nova Scotia, with weighted averages and sources cited. Hospitality buildings show the highest usage at 3,509 minutes per showerhead annually, while fitness centers show significantly higher usage at 56,893 minutes. The weighted average is 3,419 minutes per year.
Table 154 lists the parameters and corresponding values applied to the two above equations and the resulting unitary savings values for thermostatic shower valves. Table 154: Electrical Unitary Energy Savings Values for Thermostatic Shower...
AI summary Table 154 provides parameters and unitary energy savings values for thermostatic shower valves, including flow rates, shower times, water temperature rise, and efficiency factors. These values are used in calculations to determine energy savings associated with different showerhead configurations.
4.1 LED Lamps and Fixtures To establish lifetime energy savings for LED lamps and fixtures, the equipment life is determined using rated lifetimes identified in product specification sheets and annual HOU, as described in the equation belo...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of equipment life for LED lamps and fixtures using rated lifetimes and annual hours of use (HOU). It highlights the need for an equivalent EUL to account for regulatory changes affecting baseline energy use, ensuring accurate lifetime energy savings calculations. Equivalent EUL values are summarized in tables for residential and BNI LED products.
Table 163: EUL Values for BNI LED Lamps and Fixtures 1 Measure Program Component Average Rated Lifetime (hours) Annual HOU (hours/year) Equipment Life 2021 Equivalent EUL LED Linear Fixtures 1 x 4 Luminaires BER Instant Rebates, BER Mail-i...
AI summary Table 163 presents Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values for various BNI LED lamps and fixtures, including details on average rated lifetime, annual hours of use, equipment life, and EUL for different product categories and programs.
& lt;sup>182 GDS Associates. Measure Life Report Residential and Commercial/Industrial Lighting and HVAC Measures. prepared for The New England State Program Working Group (SPWG). June 2007. & lt;sup>183 Retrieved from https://www.energyst...
AI summary The text references several documents and reports related to energy efficiency and building standards, including a Measure Life Report on lighting and HVAC measures, a water heater criteria analysis from Energy Star, and a DEER 2014 update from the California Public Utilities Commission.
Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Space Heating Mini-split Heat Pumps Green Heat, HEA 18 GDS, 2007 (Table 1 – Residential Measures, value for AC/heat pumps) Central Air-source Heat Pumps Green Heat, HEA 18 GDS, 2007 (Table 1,...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures and their associated Energy Use Labels (EUL) values for residential heating systems, including heat pumps, wood stoves, and air sealing kits. The EUL values are derived from sources such as the Green Development Standards (GDS) and the U.S. Department of Energy.
Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Efficient Clothes Washers Instant Savings 11 ENERGY STAR Calculator, 2016 (Value for clothes washers) DOE, Building Energy Data Book, 2011, Table 5.7.15 (Value for clothes washers) DEER, 2014...
AI summary The table outlines various energy efficiency measures and their associated savings values, including efficient clothes washers, smart power controllers, and energy-efficient pool pumps. These measures are part of broader efficiency programs and are sourced from various studies and organizations.
Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Other New Homes NHC 30 (Tier 1 & 2) 36 (Tier 3) The EUL values were established by calculating the weighted average EUL of insulation, heating system, and lighting measures. The difference in...
AI summary The document discusses the establishment of Energy Use Label (EUL) values for new homes and space heating measures under various programs. EUL values are calculated based on weighted averages of insulation, heating systems, and lighting measures. The values are considered valid based on a literature review and 2017 evaluations.
Table 165: EUL Values and Sources for Non-LED Lighting BNI Measures Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Lighting Occupancy Sensors BER Instant Rebates, BER Mail-in, SBES 10 GDS, 2007 (Table 2 – Commercial & Industrial Measures,...
AI summary Table 165 lists energy use label (EUL) values and sources for non-LED lighting BNI measures, including occupancy sensors, heat pads, ventilation fans, and various agricultural equipment. EUL values are derived from multiple sources such as the IESO PMA List, KEMA studies, and technical reference manuals.
Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Compressed Air Air Entraining Air Nozzles BER Mail-in, SBES 15 KEMA, 2009 (Value for compressed air nozzles) Cycling Air Dryers BER Mail-in, SBES 10 KEMA, 2009 (Value for cycling air dryers)...
AI summary The table outlines various energy efficiency measures, their associated programs, EUL values, and sources. It includes details on compressed air systems, HVAC systems, and other efficiency-related components, with corresponding program names and values derived from different studies and standards.
Measure Name Program Component EUL Value Source Kitchen Demand-controlled Kitchen Exhausts BER Mail-in, SBES 15 Efficiency Maine TRM, 2019 (Value for demand control kitchen ventilation) DEER, 2014 (Value for variable speed drives controlle...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing various energy efficiency measures, their associated programs, and their EUL values. The data includes appliances such as dishwashers, freezers, fryers, and laundry equipment, with associated program components like BER Mail-in and SBES, and references to sources like DEER 2014 and the DOE.
Verification of Climate Data Validity Considering that the 1992 ADS study remains the only well-documented study for cold climates, it is still used to establish interactive effects. To ensure that the findings of the ADS study are valid a...
AI summary The document compares Nova Scotia's climate with Quebec's to assess the validity of using the 1992 ADS study for evaluating energy programs. It concludes that the ADS study's findings remain applicable to Nova Scotia despite minor differences in heating and cooling seasons.
as to the amount of time the DOE would allow between the adoption of the standards and compliance enforcement with some observers estimating that the standard will be in effect in 2023. 204 In Canada, lighting is not currently on Natural R...
AI summary The text discusses the adoption of lighting efficiency standards in the U.S. and Canada, noting that the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2020 sets a minimum efficiency level corresponding to a CFL, while the Canadian market lags by approximately two years. However, the market is shifting rapidly toward LED lamps, which has implications for baseline efficiency calculations and future regulations.
Table 169: Equivalent EUL Calculation Summary for LED Reflector Lamps Replaced Lamp (W) Replaced Lamp (W) Typical Efficient Lamp (W) 3 Years (2 Baseline 2021-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislation 220 22 Years (2024-2045) Bas...
AI summary Table 169 provides a summary of equivalent EUL calculations for LED reflector lamps, comparing wattage values for replaced lamps, typical efficient lamps, and equivalent EUL over different time periods. The table includes various lamp types such as PAR20, PAR30, PAR38, and GU10, along with their respective wattage and EUL values.
Table 175: Lifetime Energy Savings for LED Fixtures with Motion Sensors – Reduced Wattage Replaced Ffficient Wattage of Halogen Incande - Canadian 3 Years (20 Legislation CFL Equivale American Le 22 Years (2 Lifetime Energy Savings (W) Lam...
AI summary Table 175 presents the lifetime energy savings for LED fixtures with motion sensors, comparing wattage and energy savings across different lighting technologies. The table includes baseline and displaced wattage for various lamps and highlights the energy savings in kilowatt-hours.
LED General-use and Decorative Lamps The methodology used for establishing the equivalent EUL of general-use and decorative lamps is based on the information presented in [Table](#page-129-0) 177 and the equation below. The equivalent EUL...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating the equivalent Energy Use Label (EUL) for LED general-use and decorative lamps, considering baseline technologies and legislative changes. The calculation includes adjustments for the phase-out of incandescent lamps and a shift to a 18 W CFL equivalent starting in 2024.
$$Equivalent \; EUL = \frac{\Delta W_{Halogen} \times 3 \; Years + \Delta W_{CFL} \times 10.9 \; Years}{\Delta W_{Halogen}}$$ Table 180: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps in Downlight Fixtures Typic...
AI summary The document presents a formula for calculating the Equivalent Energy Use Label (EUL) and a table showing the baseline evolution of LED reflector lamps in downlight fixtures over their effective useful life. The table compares halogen and CFL baselines in terms of wattage and displacement.
E-12E1(NSUARB) RIR-1 to RIR-41
62 passages
(0.025) (0.017) (0.032) 0.006 0.009 0.044 0.036 Year Over Year Actual (0.012) (0.007) 0.007 (0.008) 0.050 0.024 0.032 0.030 0.068 (0.048) 0.006 Date Filed: April 29, 2022 E1 (NSUARB) IR-05 Page 1 of 7 M10473 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Applicatio...
AI summary The document presents tables comparing approved and actual energy efficiency investments and savings from 2015 to 2025, highlighting variances. It is part of E1's application for approval of a supply agreement for the 2023-2025 DSM Plan, with data showing discrepancies between planned and actual outcomes.
tween E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 ii) 60% of households use fuel oil as their primary heating source. 2 iii) 2020 net generation...
AI summary The text provides statistics on electricity generation and household heating sources in Nova Scotia and Massachusetts. It includes data on fuel oil and natural gas usage, net electricity generation by source, and comparisons with other regions such as Maine.
Department conducted a procedural teleconference with the Program Administrators to Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 20 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 7 II. BACKGROUND A. Development of Three-Yea...
AI summary The Department held a procedural teleconference with Program Administrators regarding the development of energy efficiency plans under the Green Communities Act. Program Administrators submitted a response with unrequested information that could not be tested on cross-examination.
the heating oil industry, one from ISO New England Inc. (“ISO-NE”), and one from energy efficiency businesses. G.L. c. 25, § 22(a). Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 21 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 P...
AI summary The text outlines the preparation of a three-year, statewide energy efficiency plan by the Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation (DOER) in coordination with the Council. The plan includes various programs such as efficiency and load management, demand response, energy storage, and support for energy use assessment and building energy codes.
up14 convened by the Council and held one-on-one meetings with various stakeholders related to the development of the Statewide Plan (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 7, 20 & App. A at 46-47). Consistent with G.L. c. 25, § 21(c), the Program Adm...
AI summary The Council convened meetings with stakeholders and the Program Administrators to develop the Statewide Plan, which was filed with the Council in April 2021. The Council provided feedback, including a resolution in July 2021 and continued input through October 2021. The Program Administrators submitted additional materials, including draft benefit-cost ratio models and an updated Statewide Plan.
at several Council and one-on-one meetings throughout October 2021 (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 47). On October 25, 2021, the Program Administrators, the Attorney General, and DOER reached a 40 page “Term Sheet” agreement that served...
AI summary In October 2021, the Program Administrators, Attorney General, and DOER reached a Term Sheet agreement guiding the finalization of the Statewide Plan. The Council supported the final Statewide Plan and the Program Administrators’ Three-Year Plans, which were filed with the Department on November 1, 2021. The Department is required to review these plans under the Green Communities Act.
Pursuant to the Green Communities Act, each Program Administrator’s Three-Year Plan must provide for the acquisition of all available energy efficiency resources that are cost 15 The Term Sheet includes a number of “key terms” agreed to by...
AI summary Under the Green Communities Act, Program Administrators must submit Three-Year Plans that prioritize cost-effective energy efficiency and demand reduction resources to mitigate capacity and energy costs for all customers. These plans must ensure the acquisition of available energy efficiency resources at the lowest reasonable customer contribution.
D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 13 Climate Act requires the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs (“EEA”) to set a goal, every three years, for the necessary contributions of the Statewide Plan to meeting each greenhouse g...
AI summary The Climate Act requires the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs to set GHG emissions reduction goals for the Statewide Plan every three years. The Green Communities Act, as amended, mandates cost-effectiveness reviews at the sector level, with a focus on benefit-cost ratios and the inclusion of the social value of GHG emissions reductions in the evaluation process.
m Administrators’ 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans, with modifications. G.L. c. 25, § 21(d)(2). Under the Three-Year Plans, the Program Administrators will invest approximately $4.0 billion in energy efficiency and demand reduction resources tha...
AI summary The 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans, aligned with the Energy Act of 2018 and the Climate Act, aim to invest $4.0 billion in energy efficiency and demand reduction, emphasizing strategic electrification and equitable access. These plans support the Commonwealth's 2030 GHG emissions reduction targets and net-zero by 2050.
supported under the Green Communities Act. See, e.g., 2016-2018 Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plans, D.P.U. 15-160 through D.P.U. 15-169, at 26 (2016) (“2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order”) (approving renter specific offering, enhanced incent...
AI summary The Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation (DOER) requires energy efficiency programs to align with GHG emissions reduction targets under the Green Communities Act. The 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans must be consistent with statutory goals and assess the impact on the distribution system to avoid reliability issues. Program Administrators are required to evaluate program effectiveness and GHG impacts.
29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 35 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 22 and the results of certain studies (see, e.g., Exh. EGMA-2, at 56-61). However, for the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan term, the Program Administrat...
AI summary The Program Administrators have delayed developing their renter strategic plan until the second quarter of 2022, which is inconsistent with the Green Communities Act. They also failed to submit a formal process for addressing Council data requests as previously directed by the Department.
are appropriate to be made so close to the filing of a multi-billion dollar, ratepayer funded Three-Year Plan. Such actions erode the credibility of the foundational elements that these Three-Year Plans have been built on. With regard to t...
AI summary The Department of Energy and Environmental Regulation (DOER) criticizes the timing of actions related to a multi-billion dollar, ratepayer-funded Three-Year Plan, arguing it undermines credibility. The DOER emphasizes the importance of reliable avoided cost studies, referencing the AESC Study and prior orders, and indicates it will not reject filings solely due to procedural deficiencies in energy efficiency plans.
343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 29 the Three-Year Plans. While the draft Statewide Plan was submitted to the Council on April 30, 2021, the EEA Secretary, consistent with St. 2021, c. 8, § 106, established the GHG emissions re...
AI summary The document discusses the process for developing and reviewing the Statewide Plan, emphasizing the Council's statutory role in reviewing and providing comments on the draft plan submitted by the Program Administrators. The timing of the GHG emissions reduction goal and the Council's advisory role are highlighted as key considerations in the process.
ewide Plan to address the Council’s recommendations or provide a statement and justification of any unresolved issues. G.L. c. 25, § 21(d)(1). Accordingly, given that the EEA Secretary’s GHG emissions reduction goals were finalized approxi...
AI summary The document discusses the development of the Statewide Plan in response to the Council’s recommendations and highlights the need for additional coordination. It emphasizes the Program Administrators' responsibility to file complete and accurate Three-Year Plans by the statutory deadline, while noting that future GHG emissions goals will be set earlier to avoid timing challenges.
re that the Statewide Plan development process is sufficiently transparent to ensure that stakeholders are made aware of any significant revisions from the draft to final Statewide Plan. During prior three-year energy efficiency planning c...
AI summary The document discusses the development process of the Statewide Plan and highlights concerns about its transparency and timeliness. While collaboration with the Council and stakeholders is supported, the process has not resolved all issues in a timely manner, impacting the Program Administrators' ability to submit complete and accurate plans.
mandate, the Program Administrators coordinate with the Council to develop the programs contained in the Statewide Plan. G.L. c. 25, § 21(b)(1). The Department requires that the Program Administrators use a net lifetime all fuel savings me...
AI summary The Department requires Program Administrators to use a net lifetime all fuel savings metric, measured in MMBtus, and to report net savings by fuel and electric demand savings. The Program Administrators must also ensure that their Three-Year Plans address cost-effective energy efficiency and demand reduction resources.
energy efficiency and demand reduction resources. See G.L. c. 25, §§ 19(a), 19(b), 21(b)(1). B. Program Administrators Proposal 1. Plan Goals The Program Administrators set savings goals and GHG emissions reduction goals for the term, both...
AI summary The Program Administrators set energy efficiency and demand reduction goals for the 2022-2024 term, including both individual and aggregate savings and GHG emissions reduction targets. The goals are calculated using conversion factors to account for embedded energy in electricity generation.
,013,084 3,317 Compact 9,906,529 35,009 Aggregate Statewide Goal 129,390,960 474,518 Table 2: Individual Gas Program Administrator Goals (2022-2024 Term Total)37 Lifetime Savings Avoided GHG Emissions (MMBtus) (metric tons CO2e in 2030) Na...
AI summary The document outlines statewide goals for GHG emissions reduction and energy savings, including specific targets set by the EEA Secretary on July 15, 2021, and details the contributions from various gas program administrators.
Page 39 On July 15, 2021, the EEA Secretary established the GHG emissions reduction goals for the current Statewide Plan. The Secretary established an overall goal to reduce CO2e emissions by 845,000 metric tons by 2030, with 504,000 metri...
AI summary The EEA Secretary established a GHG emissions reduction goal of 845,000 metric tons by 2030, with specific allocations for electric and gas Program Administrators. The Program Administrators propose a revised allocation, shifting 28,982 metric tons from the electric to the gas allocation.
37). In other words, the Program Administrators propose to count approximately 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reductions from the gas Program Administrators towards the electric Administrator, see, e.g., Exh. EGMA-4 (Rev.), Tab “Savi...
AI summary The Program Administrators propose counting 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reductions from gas-to-electric fuel switching toward the electric Program Administrator’s goal. They set these goals considering sustainability, stakeholder input, avoided costs, prior energy efficiency orders, bill impacts, and studies on energy efficiency potential and EM&V results.
ity; (4) economic conditions; (5) penetration of natural gas and delivered fuels; and (6) depth of community engagement (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 13; see, Exh. DPU-Comm 6-1). 38 To provide them with a better understanding of the r...
AI summary The text discusses the factors considered in energy efficiency planning, including technical, economic, and community engagement aspects. It also outlines proposed enhancements in the residential sector for the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan, such as a Community First Partnership Program aimed at more equitable distribution of program benefits.
rs plan to implement a workforce development program with a focus on introducing new skills to the existing workforce and bringing underrepresented groups into the field (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. H at 4). Through EM&V research, the Pro...
AI summary The Program Administrators are implementing a workforce development program aimed at enhancing skills and increasing diversity in the workforce. They have established an Evaluation Management Committee and developed a strategic evaluation plan to guide evaluation activities for the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan. The Three-Year Plan includes energy efficiency and demand reduction goals aligned with GHG emissions targets.
year period beginning January 1, 2022, and that the Three-Year Plan is constructed to attain GHG emissions reduction targets set by the EEA Secretary (Program Administrators Brief at 14, 16-17). The Program Administrators argue that the Th...
AI summary The Program Administrators assert that the Three-Year Plan is designed to meet GHG emissions reduction targets set by the EEA Secretary, including a goal of reducing CO2e emissions by 845,000 metric tons by 2030. They highlight that the plan includes aggressive energy savings goals and a roadmap for achieving these reductions.
Statewide Plan complies with the Climate Act and the EEA Secretary’s overall GHG Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 84 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 71 emissions reduction goal (DOER Brief at 11)....
AI summary The DOER supports the Program Administrators' Statewide Plan, which aligns with the Climate Act and EEA Secretary’s GHG reduction goals. DOER emphasizes the importance of electrification, including incentives for switching to cold-air heat pumps, and supports mid-cycle changes to ADR offerings being addressed through the Council.
nters and landlords while minimizing risks of displacement and gentrification (CLF Brief at 30). CLF also requests that the Program Administrators (1) further develop their participation goals by building size and plans for serving C&I ren...
AI summary The Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) supports electrification efforts by Program Administrators, emphasizing benefits for environmental justice communities and low-income households. CLF requests improved outreach strategies, including customized communication and community-focused marketing, and argues that electrification reduces heating costs and aligns with the Climate Act.
olistic approach to overcoming the technical and financial barriers of electrification (CLF Reply Brief at 2-3, citing MEMA Brief, at 7-9). CLF argues that the EEA Secretary has stated a clear policy need to ramp up electrification and tra...
AI summary The text discusses the need for a holistic approach to electrification, emphasizing the importance of overcoming technical and financial barriers. It also highlights the Low-Income Energy Affordability Network's (LEAN) position on maintaining energy efficiency programs for low-income participants, including specific measures related to lighting and fossil fuel heating systems.
ir customers from qualifying renewable energy facilities. 225 CMR 14.07. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 93 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 80 encourage the use of RPS-eligible fuels for CHP faci...
AI summary NECEC argues that excluding renewable natural gas from efficiency measures in the Three-Year Plan creates market uncertainty and may lead to higher emissions from diesel generators. NEGPA supports the Three-Year Plans but criticizes the omission of ground source heat pump measures in the Statewide Plan, which it claims undermines cost-effectiveness and net zero goals.
Page 84 2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order, at 25-27; 2013-2015 Three-Year Plans Order, at 37-40. In addition, the Department considers whether the proposed programs prioritize safety, reliability, security, affordability, equity, and the GH...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation criteria for Three-Year Plans, including safety, reliability, affordability, equity, and GHG limits. It references legal frameworks such as the Energy Act of 2018 and the Green Communities Act, emphasizing the inclusion of strategic electrification in energy efficiency programs to achieve cost-effective GHG reductions.
.)). These goals were developed through a collaborative process that culminated with Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 98 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 85 the Council’s approval of the Statewide...
AI summary The Department has reviewed the Statewide Plan and found that the energy efficiency goals developed by the Program Administrator are appropriate, considering studies, sustainability, and territory-specific factors. The net lifetime all fuel savings metric is also deemed correctly calculated, taking into account various fuel types and embedded energy values.
ed modifications for heating systems and lighting addressed below, consistent with the achievement of all available cost-effective energy efficiency (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, at 144-151). In addition, each Three-Year Plan must be designed t...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures and their alignment with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction goals under the Energy Efficiency Act (EEA). It highlights the need for the electric Program Administrators to meet their emissions reduction targets, which they currently fall short of, and proposes transferring some reductions from the gas Program Administrators.
at 2-3; see, e.g., Exh. NSTAR Gas-2, at 37). To address this shortfall, the Program Administrators propose to transfer approximately 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reduction to be achieved by the gas Program Administrators to the ele...
AI summary The Program Administrators propose transferring 30,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions reduction from gas to electric programs due to a shortfall in planned electric GHG emissions reduction. They argue this is appropriate as the reductions come from gas-to-electric fuel switching. DOER, Acadia, and NECEC support the proposal, but the Department notes that modifying the EEA Secretary's goals may lack legal authority.
electrification efforts, the Department notes that neither the parties, nor the Department have the legal authority to effectively modify the goals established by the EEA Secretary and it is not appropriate for customers of gas Program Adm...
AI summary The Department notes that the EEA Secretary's goals were set after the Program Administrators submitted their draft Statewide Plan, limiting their ability to align with the goals during the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan development. Future planning processes will allow more time for alignment, as per G.L. c. 21N, § 3B. The Department also states that electrification goals cannot be modified by the parties or the Department and that electric Program Administrators are responsible for meeting their GHG reduction goals.
degree to which the activities undertaken by the Program Administrators pursuant to the performance of each Three-Year Plan met the goals for the Statewide Plan set by the EEA Secretary pursuant to G.L. c. 21N, § 3B. Accordingly, in each A...
AI summary The Program Administrators are required to align their activities with the EEA Secretary's GHG emissions reduction goals. Strategic enhancements are proposed to address barriers in residential, income-eligible, and C&I sectors, including workforce development and increased participation through flexible strategies.
-115). The Program Administrators propose several strategies for the C&I sector, which include: (1) increasing participation of microbusinesses through the Main Streets offering; (2) developing a technically proficient and diverse workforc...
AI summary The Program Administrators propose several strategies for the C&I sector, including increasing microbusiness participation and improving workforce diversity. They also suggest technical assistance and new optimization measures. The Department supports these strategies as reasonable for addressing barriers and emphasizing new technologies. NEGPA recommends a 30-year measure life for ground source heat pumps, but Program Administrators plan to use 25 years. The Department directs a review of the TRM for electrification offerings before the next Three-Year Plan filing.
lan term, the Department directs the Program Administrators to perform a review of the TRM for each prescriptive electrification offering before the next Three-Year Plan filing to ensure the accuracy of measure assumptions (Statewide Plan,...
AI summary The Department of Public Utilities directs Program Administrators to review the Technology Readiness Matrix for prescriptive electrification offerings prior to the next Three-Year Plan filing. The Three-Year Plans include strategies to address participation barriers for hard-to-reach customers, with a focus on promoting equity and cost-effective energy efficiency. The Community First Partnership Program is highlighted as a strategy to increase energy efficiency reach, particularly in environmental justice communities.
9, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 115 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 102 obligation to continuously improve customer outreach and other methods of attracting customers to maximize participation. The Department fully...
AI summary The Program Administrators propose prioritizing strategic electrification in the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plan to shift from fossil-fuel based heating and cooling towards electrification. This is aimed at meeting GHG emissions reduction goals set by the EEA Secretary and supporting the Commonwealth’s net zero goals. However, it is noted that electrification alone, through energy efficiency, may not be sufficient to achieve climate goals without additional policies and customer decisions.
heir strategic electrification efforts, the Program Administrators state that they will continue to focus on weatherization as a foundational measure that reduces energy use and prepares residential and commercial buildings for strategic e...
AI summary The Program Administrators emphasize weatherization as a foundational measure for reducing energy use and preparing buildings for strategic electrification, supported by intervenors. The Department supports cost-effective energy and GHG emission reductions while minimizing ratepayer costs. NECEC argues that strategic electrification does not necessarily require individual customer energy use reduction, but the Department aligns with Program Administrators that electrification must reduce energy consumption and peak demand to be included in efficiency investment plans.
are fulfilling their statutory obligation to pursue all cost-effective energy efficiency resources (Exh. DPU-Comm 10-12). Cost-effective savings for limited fossil fuel heating are still available (Exh. DPU-Comm 10-12). A participant upgra...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures, including upgrading condensing heating systems and the cost-effectiveness of such upgrades. It mentions savings in energy consumption and GHG emissions, and the Department supports prioritizing heat pumps and low-carbon technologies through market transformation.
cy measure during the upcoming Three-Year Plans term (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. M § IV.C.2).98 Consistent with the Term Sheet, the Program Administrators did not include any renewable natural gas CHP proposals in the 2022-2024 Three-Yea...
AI summary The Program Administrators excluded renewable natural gas CHP proposals from the 2022-2024 Three-Year Plans, aligning with the Term Sheet's phase-out of natural gas CHP incentives. However, they later added the provision to the October 6th draft Statewide Plan, allowing support for cost-effective projects that meet emissions and savings criteria under the EEA methodology.
D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 135 Statewide Plan.99 Less than three weeks after submitting the October 6th draft Statewide Plan to the Council, the Program Administrators, DOER, and Attorney General reached agreement on the Term...
AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPU) is concerned that the Program Administrators are not fulfilling their statutory obligation to include all cost-effective energy efficiency resources in the Three-Year Plan, specifically noting the exclusion of renewable natural gas CHP measures. The Green Communities Act identifies CHP as an energy efficiency measure and has been included in prior plans.
age 139 The Department recognizes that the implementation of the Climate Act, along with the EEA Secretary’s Goal Letter dated July 15, 2021, introduced some uncertainty into the then-ongoing energy efficiency planning process. The Program...
AI summary The Department acknowledges that the Climate Act and the EEA Secretary’s Goal Letter introduced uncertainty into the energy efficiency planning process. Program Administrators will incorporate GHG emissions factors and reductions into future studies, with the EEA Secretary setting GHG goals by March 1st to allow sufficient time for planning.
ton (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. Q, Study 1, at 197). The Program Administrators state that, in light of the passage of the Climate Act, they entered into a new contract with the study author to update the recommended social value of GHG...
AI summary The Program Administrators updated the social value of GHG emissions reductions from $128 to $393 per short ton by adjusting the discount rate from 2% to 1%, following a supplemental study and in response to the Climate Act. This update is used in calculating benefits for energy efficiency programs.
il 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 177 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 164 Commonwealth’s policy goals (Acadia Brief at 17). Further, Acadia claims that the AESC Study author noted the original social value of GHG...
AI summary Acadia and the Conservation Law Foundation argue for a lower discount rate to better align with climate policy goals and the social value of GHG emissions reductions. They emphasize the need to prioritize equity and climate change mitigation in decision-making processes.
outright that a one percent discount rate more accurately reflects the intergenerational nature of climate change in Massachusetts than a two percent discount rate Statewide Plan Exh. 1, App. Q, Study 3, at 15-18; Exhs. DPU-Comm 14(b), (c)...
AI summary The text discusses the use of a one percent discount rate in Massachusetts for climate change considerations, citing studies and comments from Attorneys General. The Department of Energy Resources argues that the new information does not definitively support the proposed change and that the comments were taken out of context.
The Program Administrators claim that a primary reason to change the social value of GHG emissions reductions is to recognize the added priority of GHG emissions reduction as 116 By incorporating a social value of GHG emissions reductions...
AI summary The Program Administrators argue that incorporating a social value of GHG emissions reductions in the BCR screening model increases the valuation of GHG-reducing measures. However, the Department disputes this, stating the Climate Act's purpose is to account for avoided carbon costs, not to prioritize GHG reduction. The Department also criticizes the Program Administrators for bypassing the AESC Study group process.
s in the Supplemental Study were the result of a careful, stakeholder-driven analysis. In fact, the Program Administrators admitted that no quantitative analysis was performed during the course of the Supplemental Study (Tr. 2, at 290-292;...
AI summary The Supplemental Study's findings are questioned due to a lack of quantitative analysis, and the AESC Study is expected to provide reliable avoided cost figures for the Three-Year Plan. The AESC Study is conducted before the draft Statewide Plan is submitted to ensure Program Administrators have time to finalize proposals.
tandard component is either 75 percent of planned standard component benefits or the statewide weighted portfolio threshold (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 27, 29; Tr. 3, at 403). The Program Administrators propose to establish the weig...
AI summary The Program Administrators propose to establish a weighted portfolio threshold for benefits and discontinue the value component to avoid conflicting incentives and promote electrification and equitable access. They also submitted a revised exemplar performance incentive mechanism upon request.
ernative approaches to the value mechanism design from prior plans (Attorney General Reply Brief at 2). In this regard, the Attorned General maintains that DOER’s recommendation that the Department apply the value component individually to...
AI summary The Attorney General and DOER discuss the design of a value mechanism for emissions reduction programs. DOER argues that the proposed performance incentive mechanism aligns with the Climate Act and ensures equitable outcomes. The mechanism includes three components: value, equity, and performance, with the value component applied individually to each benefit category.
, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 211 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 198 statewide (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 29). The Attorney General, DOER, and Acadia support the adoption of the electrification component...
AI summary The Department of Public Utilities (DPUE) has raised concerns about the electrification component of the Statewide Plan, arguing that it lacks sufficient definition and verifiability. The Attorney General, DOER, and Acadia support the electrification component, but the Program Administrators have identified some measures as ineligible. The DPUE requires Program Administrators to revise their Energy Efficiency Data Tables to address these concerns.
osed electrification component, as modified above, is appropriately designed to overcome barriers in the nascent market for fuel conversions (see Tr. 3, at 363-364). 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans Order, at 96. However, as proposed, the Depart...
AI summary The Department identifies a design flaw in the electrification component of the Program, noting insufficient safeguards that may create perverse incentives for Program Administrators to prioritize electrification over weatherization and right-sizing of heating and cooling equipment. To address this, the Department proposes making performance incentives contingent on prior weatherization.
”) tariffs (see, e.g., Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. A at 40; Exh. NG-Electric-5, Table IV.B.3.6 (Rev.)). Based on current Department-approved tariffs, the electric Program Administrators calculate separate EERFs for their residential, low-...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy efficiency reconciliation factors (EERFs) for different customer classes and the use of local distribution adjustment factors (LDAF) by gas Program Administrators. It also notes the lack of projected revenues from other funding sources during the Three-Year Plan term and the submission of bill impacts for both participants and non-participants.
tribution rates (excluding the fixed customer charge) and 14 percent of residential electric distribution rates (excluding the fixed customer charge) (see, e.g., Exh. NG-Gas-6, at 12). $60 million of the $2.1 billion total electric budget)...
AI summary The text discusses the distribution rates and budget allocations, referencing specific exhibits and regulatory filings. It highlights the need to consider energy bill impacts on customers, especially during the pandemic and rising energy costs, while acknowledging the long-term benefits of efficiency programs, including GHG reductions.
Administrators to develop best practices for transitioning all customers to electrification and, in particular, low- and moderate-income customers who have historically under-participated in many energy efficiency programs (NECEC Brief at...
AI summary The document discusses the need for administrators to develop best practices for transitioning customers, especially low- and moderate-income individuals, to electrification. It also outlines the Compact's proposed enhancements to the Statewide Plan under G.L. c. 164, § 134(b), which must be reviewed in the context of the Green Communities Act.
ree-Year Energy Plans 162 The appeal has been docketed as SJ-2021-0443. Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 271 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 258 Order, at 74. The passage of the Energy Act of 2018...
AI summary The appeal has been docketed as SJ-2021-0443. The discussion focuses on the interpretation of the Green Communities Act and whether the proposed CVEO solar PV component is authorized under the Energy Act of 2018 and the Climate Act. The argument centers on whether solar PV qualifies as a renewable energy source under the Act.
182 We note that previously the Compact has reiterated its erroneous belief that it has complied with the Department’s directive that it identify its allocation methods and factors and that the “method it identified to allocate shared cost...
AI summary The text discusses the Compact's incorrect belief that it has fulfilled the Department's directive to identify allocation methods and factors for shared costs. It references past orders and cases where allocation methods were discussed and approved, emphasizing the Department's authority to oversee the EES and investigate the appropriateness of funds collected through it.
entive mechanism easily applicable to the Compact. As investor-owned utilities, all other Program Administrators are subject to performance incentives and penalties, and poor performance will be the responsibility of the utility’s sharehol...
AI summary The Department emphasizes the need for additional scrutiny of the Compact's performance due to its historical poor performance and the necessity of ensuring that municipal aggregators meet energy efficiency goals and deliver programs safely and equitably.
§ 1A. If the Compact fails to improve on its record of underspending on low-income customers, historically low participation rates among all residential customers relative to the statewide average, and overall cost-effective and cost-effic...
AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources may decertify the Compact’s energy efficiency investment plan if it fails to improve performance, particularly in low-income participation and cost-effectiveness. Certification will be based on performance and ability to meet goals equitably. The text also mentions the consolidation of EGMA/NSTAR Gas three-year plans following an acquisition.
the low-income sector. In addition, NSTAR Gas and EGMA shall file all Annual Reports and Term Reports (and related documents) for this Three-Year Plans term, both on an individual and an aggregate basis. The Department will review the perf...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for NSTAR Gas and EGMA to file reports and update screening models as part of their compliance with the Three-Year Plans. It also discusses the Program Administrators' proposal to include energy savings from a Codes and Standards Compliance and Technical Support initiative in their Three-Year Plans.
l 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 327 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 314 The Program Administrators introduced codes and standards compliance support as a measure in their 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans (Statewide Pl...
AI summary The Program Administrators introduced codes and standards compliance support in their 2019-2021 Three-Year Plans and propose to increase their focus on this area through lobbying efforts in the 2022-2024 plan term. They also intend to claim savings related to appliance standards provisions starting in 2023.
, subject to an appeals process (Statewide Plan, Exh. 1, App. H at 8). Date Filed: April 29, 2022 NSUARB IR-17, Attachment 3, Page 336 of 343 D.P.U. 21-120 through D.P.U. 21-129 Page 323 cannot count these claimed savings towards their per...
AI summary The text discusses the requirement for Program Administrators under the Green Communities Act to file three-year energy efficiency plans by October 31st of the year prior to the plan's first year. The Department must issue an Order on these plans within 90 days of filing, leading to a gap of about 30 days between the end of previously approved programs and the approval of new plans.
Page 325 reasonable and are consistent with the achievement of all available cost-effective energy-efficiency and demand-reduction resources. The Department has reviewed the Three-Year Plans and finds that they are constructed in a manner...
AI summary The Department of Energy and Resource Development has reviewed the Three-Year Plans and found them to be consistent with GHG emissions reduction goals. It has directed Program Administrators to implement these plans while minimizing administrative costs, using competitive procurement, and ensuring sufficient funding for low-income programs.
1 • reviewed and validated energy and demand savings assumptions for individual 2 measures; 3 • reviewed and validated compilation of technical tables from raw model outputs; 4 • reviewed and validated the translation of raw model outputs...
AI summary The text outlines quality assurance activities performed by Guidehouse for the ProCESS and DRSim models, including validation of energy savings assumptions, model outputs, and index assignments to ensure accuracy and consistency in data processing and analysis.
E-12-(i)NSUARB IR-17 Attachment 2_ACEEE’s Entire State Database - Excel
280 passages
Last Reviewed: May 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Alabama was one of eight states participating in the US DOE's Residential Energy Code Field Study, which included an initial field study, followed by education and outreach...
AI summary Alabama participated in a US DOE study on residential energy code compliance, achieving 92% initial compliance with 2009 codes. Post-study, compliance was re-evaluated under 2015 codes. Utilities and stakeholders collaborate via the AERC Board, with Alabama Power offering training for code verification. ADECA and the Institute for Market Transformation led education efforts.
constructed to the latest version of ASHRAE/IESNA standard. The Department of Education also requires that new facilities constructed with FY14 funds must be constructed to the same ASHRAE standards. Senate Bill 220 also directed the Offic...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency policies in Alaska, including adherence to ASHRAE/IESNA standards for new facilities, Senate Bill 220's mandate for energy data collection via ARIS, a $250M revolving loan fund for retrofits, and the role of ESCOs and AIDEA in facilitating ESPCs and loans. Benchmarking efforts and state-led initiatives are highlighted.
ycle cost analysis. The Arkansas Energy Office must update this program annually. HB 1663 also directed the Arkansas Energy Office to complete an energy audit of every public agency within five years. In May 2009, Governor Mike Beebe issue...
AI summary Arkansas has implemented several energy efficiency policies, including annual program updates, energy audits for public agencies, strategic energy plans, and the Energy Performance Contracting Program. These initiatives aim to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy use across state agencies and public buildings.
effective on January 1, 2015. Newly constructed or remodeled public buildings must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007. Newly constructed or remodeled state-owned buildings must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2013. Last Reviewed: May 2021 "," Baseline &...
AI summary Arkansas requires new or remodeled public and state-owned buildings to comply with specific ASHRAE standards. The state participates in a US DOE study to assess energy code compliance, with an estimated 88% compliance rate. Arkansas has limited policies to encourage CHP and no new CHP systems were installed in 2018. The state engages in training and outreach programs for energy conservation and has a stakeholder advisory group focused on energy codes.
ch include provisions for demand-side resources. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. For further reading, in March 2011, as p...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Arkansas, including the establishment of energy efficiency resource standards, cost recovery mechanisms, and the expansion of programs by utilities to meet annual targets. It references regulatory actions and reports related to these initiatives.
efficiency targets. Recovery of direct program costs associated with commission-approved energy efficiency programs is accomplished through an energy efficiency cost recovery rider on customer bills. The most recent budgets for energy effi...
AI summary The Commission approved Resource Planning Guidelines for Electric Utilities in Docket 06-028-R, requiring utilities to consider demand-side resources for incremental capacity needs. Energy efficiency cost recovery is handled through a rider on customer bills, and EERS was established in 2010 to require utilities to file energy efficiency plans. Savings targets for 2020-2022 are 1.20% for electric utilities and 0.5% for natural gas utilities.
the audit and installation is covered by the customer’s AWP utility, and the balance is paid by the customer. Customers eligible for the DOE WAP have their co-payment covered by that federal program. Last updated: June 2020 ","An Arkansas...
AI summary The text outlines eligibility criteria for opting out of energy efficiency (EE) programs in Arkansas, including requirements for Self-Direct and Opt-out customers. It also references the Arkansas PSC's approval in 2010 for investor-owned utilities to recover lost revenues from future EE programs, citing Order No. 14 Docket 08-137-U.
ns have specific advisory group, policies, programs and metrics to ensure energy equity. State agencies involved include CEC, CPUC and California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The Disadvantaged Community Advisory G...
AI summary The text discusses energy equity initiatives in California, including the Disadvantaged Community Advisory Group (DACAG), the 2019 California Energy Efficiency Action Plan, and the Energy Equity Indicators Tracking Progress report. These efforts aim to improve access to energy programs for low-income and disadvantaged communities and ensure data collection and collaboration across agencies.
The CEC’s energy research and development programs also prioritize energy equity to ensure that the most vulnerable communities benefit from emerging clean energy technologies. The CEC’s EPIC program exceeded the requirements set forth in...
AI summary The CEC's EPIC program focuses on energy equity by allocating funds to disadvantaged and low-income communities. Outreach efforts, including community engagement meetings and the launch of the Empower Innovation platform, aim to connect stakeholders and improve program effectiveness. A Civic Spark fellow was hired to better understand community needs in specific cities.
-specific education and training. The WE&T Connections subprogram facilitates implementation of energy efficiency strategic planning for K-12, community colleges, adult education, and higher education institutions. It seeks to promote ener...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs targeting educational institutions and building energy disclosure requirements in California. It outlines the WE&T Connections subprogram and Assembly Bills 1103 and 802, which mandate energy consumption data disclosure for commercial and multifamily buildings.
nergy Commission will publicly disclose some of the reported information beginning in 2019 for buildings with no residential utility accounts, and 2020 for buildings with residential utility accounts. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","CA Executi...
AI summary California's Executive Order B-18-12 sets energy and water efficiency targets for state agencies, including zero net energy (ZNE) goals for new and existing buildings. The state has already exceeded some targets, with over 5 million square feet of existing buildings achieving ZNE status. The policy was accelerated in 2017, requiring new buildings to meet ZNE standards earlier than originally planned.
2019. In 2019, ESCO projects resulted in over 6 million kWh in annual energy savings. Total energy savings seen in 2019 from all prior years ESCO projects combined equal approximately 57 million kWh. Last Updated: August 2020 ","The Califo...
AI summary In 2019, ESCO projects achieved 6 million kWh in annual energy savings, with cumulative savings from prior projects reaching 57 million kWh. The California Energy Commission's Energy Research and Development program supports research to improve energy efficiency across various sectors, including buildings, appliances, and industrial processes, funded by EPIC and other initiatives.
Last Updated: September 2020 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), in collaboration with the Energy Commission, adopted the state’s Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (“Strat...
AI summary The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and Energy Commission developed a Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (2009-2020), aiming for Zero Net Energy in new residential buildings by 2020 and commercial buildings by 2030. Compliance studies and evaluations were conducted across multiple program cycles, with reports published on the CALMAC website.
er Architectural Aluminum, American Society of Home Inspectors (ASHI), Nevada County Contractors Association, Valley Contractors Exchange, International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), OJ Insulation, newly develop...
AI summary In 2019, the Statewide Codes and Standards Compliance Improvement (CI) Subprogram, implemented by California’s investor-owned utilities and the California Energy Commission (CEC), focused on behavior change across the building and appliance efficiency supply chains. The Subprogram delivered training, outreach, and tools to support compliance with the 2019 Energy Code, reaching over 3,600 students with a high satisfaction rate.
ols and training for the healthcare building practitioners who must now comply with 2019 Energy Code requirements for hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The CI Subprogram worked alongside the Energy Commission in developing a “Turb...
AI summary The CI Subprogram has developed an online interface to help building practitioners comply with the 2019 Energy Code requirements for healthcare facilities. They also provide outreach, training, and support for Certified Energy Analysts. California has implemented policies to encourage CHP, including interconnection standards and incentive programs.
encourage CHP including interconnection standards, incentive programs, financial assistance, and additional supportive policies. In 2018, five new CHP installations were completed. ","Policy: Rule 21 Description: California was among the f...
AI summary The text discusses California's policies and regulations supporting combined heat and power (CHP) systems, including Rule 21, which establishes interconnection standards for distributed generation. Assembly Bill 32 and the Governor’s Clean Energy Jobs Program set CHP deployment targets, while Assembly Bill 1890 and 995 emphasize energy efficiency and renewable resources over new fossil-fuel generation.
he electric utilities to hold solicitations between 2015 and 2020 to procure energy and capacity from efficient CHP resources sufficient to achieve 2.72 MMTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Revenue streams: CHP systems in Califo...
AI summary The text discusses how California electric utilities procure energy and capacity from efficient combined heat and power (CHP) resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It outlines revenue streams, including feed-in tariffs and standard offer contracts, established by regulatory bodies such as the CPUC and the California Energy Commission.
ist CHP facilities in meeting the eligibility and interconnection requirements of the standard offer contracts available through the state's CHP feed-in-tarrif and the state's implementation of PURPA. The CA IOUs frequently issue Requests...
AI summary The document discusses California's policies and programs supporting combined heat and power (CHP) facilities, including standard offer contracts, feed-in tariffs, and incentives for renewable-fueled CHP systems. It also highlights the role of the California IOUs in issuing Requests for Offers (RFOs) for Local Capacity Resources (LCRs), with some RFOs targeting renewable DG and energy storage, while others include natural gas CHP. The BioMAT Program and SB 859 are also mentioned as key initiatives.
s. Heat utilization is optional, and CHP can enhance the economics when a suitable thermal host is on site or nearby. Through 2018, there have been 22 signed contracts for 33 MW of capacity statewide. Escalation of wildfires in the State h...
AI summary The text discusses the role of combined heat and power (CHP) in enhancing energy economics and grid resiliency, noting that CHP has not received much attention in California's resiliency plans. It also highlights California's long history of energy efficiency programs, including decoupling and performance incentives, and the updated 10-year efficiency goals set by the CPUC.
the Air Resources Board (ARB) and other state agencies to implement AB 32. In 2016, SB 32 was passed to further require the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40% below the 1990 level by 2030. Beginning in fiscal year 2013-2014, Ca...
AI summary California has prioritized energy efficiency as a primary resource for meeting new energy demands, driven by legislation such as AB 1890 and AB 995. The CPUC has set aggressive efficiency targets and funding, and in Decision 12-11-015, mandated a 5% market spillover effects adder for program tracking claims. The state also allocated significant funds through Prop. 39 for energy efficiency and clean energy in schools.
works, and community choice aggregators to apply a market spillover effects adder of 5% to their program tracking claims, acknowledging the impacts of energy efficiency programs on the market overall. In August 2019, in a move that helps a...
AI summary The text discusses modifications to California's energy efficiency policies by the CPUC, including the introduction of a market spillover effects adder for efficiency programs and updates to the three-prong test related to fuel substitution. These changes aim to align energy efficiency efforts with climate goals and increase the use of energy efficiency funds for electrification. SB 350 has also led to the doubling of energy efficiency targets by 2030.
electric and gas IOUs. Over the first five years (2020-2025) targets translate to roughly 1.6% gross electric savings and 0.6% gross gas savings, including codes & standards supportive efforts (link). Last reviewed: August 2020 ","Summary:...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency targets set for California’s electric and gas IOUs, including 1.6% gross electric savings and 0.6% gross gas savings from 2020-2025. These targets were formalized by the CPUC in various decisions, including Decision 04-09-060 and Decision 08-07-047, following the 2001 electricity crisis and Assembly Bill 2021 of 2006.
o establish the Energy Data Request and Release Process (EDRP), which is underway, as well as an Energy Data Access Committee comprised of relevant stakeholders to serve as an informal advisory body. Data to third parties are transmitted v...
AI summary The document outlines the Energy Data Request and Release Process (EDRP) and the establishment of an Energy Data Access Committee. It details how energy data is shared with third parties through Green Button Connect platforms, eligibility criteria for data access, and security measures required for data transmission. Costs related to data management are funded through general rate cases.
owned utilities do not charge a fee for providing data. Costs incurred by utilities for data management and request fulfilment are tracked in a balancing account and funded through general rate cases. Data provided via Green Button Connect...
AI summary The document outlines requirements for the provision of energy use data, including the process for requesting data, confidentiality measures, and the exclusion of buildings with fewer than 15 tenants from Whole Building Usage Information. It also mentions the authorization for data sharing with third parties and government entities.
“data catalogs” that each utility is required to maintain. This information is detailed on the utility websites, which can be located from this web page: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=10151. Last reviewed: July 2019 ",10.5 out of...
AI summary The text discusses California's comprehensive transportation and land-use planning policies, including Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley) from 2002, which addressed greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. California's vehicle emission standards have evolved over time, with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) setting stricter targets for model years 2017 to 2025, and updating the zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) program to increase production of clean vehicles.
s impacts on energy rates are better understood. Colorado WAP will be expanding its community engagement approach starting July 1, 2021, with a focus on EDI for engagement across Colorado communities. The heat pump pilot program will likel...
AI summary The text discusses Colorado's Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) expansion and its focus on equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in community engagement. It also highlights the heat pump pilot program's role in developing expertise in heat pump installation, addressing Colorado's low level of air conditioning expertise. The CEO collaborates with utilities and organizations to promote heat pump contractor training and provides funding for certifications and equipment.
seline of FY 2014-15 or at least 7.5% by the end of FY 2022-23 for vehicles categorized as special use. The executive order further requires that all agencies priorize EVs for light duty applications. Last Updated: July 2020 ","Since Color...
AI summary Colorado's Energy Performance Contracting Program (EPC) has led to significant utility savings and attracted substantial capital investment since its establishment in the mid-1990s. Additionally, the Colorado Energy Office (CEO) conducted research on energy savings opportunities in the marijuana growing industry and the industrial sector, providing tools to help growers make informed energy efficiency decisions.
olorado Energy Code Compliance Collaborative is highly involved in building code compliance. The Collaborative's mission is to facilitate compliance with local energy codes and to coordinate energy code actions and policies throughout the...
AI summary The Colorado Energy Code Compliance Collaborative facilitates compliance with local energy codes and provides training and outreach to stakeholders. The Colorado Energy Office offers free education and technical assistance to local governments on energy code adoption and implementation. Colorado has policies supporting combined heat and power (CHP), but no new CHP systems were installed in 2018.
s some policies in place to encourage CHP including supportive interconnection policies and net metering rules. No new CHP systems were installed in 2018. ","Policy: Code of Colorado Regulations 723-3 Description: Modeled very closely on t...
AI summary The document discusses Colorado's interconnection standards and net metering rules for CHP systems, noting that no new CHP systems were installed in 2018. It also mentions that there are no state-wide policies to acquire energy savings or generation from CHP, but CHP may be eligible for incentives and financing from the Colorado Energy Office and Xcel Energy.
expanded their demand-side management (DSM) programs in recent years. The utilities file DSM plans annually, and are working toward the most recent EERS targets which have ramped up to 1.68% in 2020. HB 1227, signed in June 2017, extends e...
AI summary Colorado has expanded its demand-side management (DSM) programs, with utilities submitting annual DSM plans and aiming for EERS targets of 1.68% in 2020. HB 1227, enacted in 2017, extends electric efficiency programs to 2028 and mandates 5% peak demand reduction and energy savings goals. Xcel Energy and Black Hills Energy are the major utilities administering these programs, funded through a DSM cost adjustment mechanism rate rider.
lly-recognized open standards and best practices.” Requirements for Provision of Energy Use Data No policies are in place that require the provision of energy use data. Energy Use Data Availability The state does not have an online standar...
AI summary Colorado does not have policies requiring the provision of energy use data and lacks an online system for accessing such data. The state has implemented legislation to support public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian investments, as well as adopted low emission and zero emission vehicle standards to improve fuel efficiency and increase the percentage of zero emission vehicles.
core investments. In calendar year 2016, C-PACE financed 200 projects for $114 million in energy efficiency and energy efficiency/renewable energy financing for upgrades. Last Updated: July 2018 "," We were unable to determine if the state...
AI summary Connecticut's Home Energy Solutions program implemented a home energy score and labeling pilot in mid-2014, which became fully integrated in 2015. Confidentiality laws prevent public disclosure of scores, but participants are encouraged to share them voluntarily. The program aims to drive market transformation by using energy labels to guide real estate and energy efficiency decisions. As of 2019, over 33,000 scores had been distributed.
Connecticut as the first state to implement the statewide adoption of home energy scores. As of Spring 2019, 33,952 DOE home energy scores have been distributed to Home Energy Solutions participants. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Connecticut...
AI summary Connecticut has implemented a statewide home energy score program and a 'Lead by Example' initiative to reduce energy use in state buildings. The state has allocated $88 million for energy efficiency retrofits, with significant savings achieved through completed and approved projects. The initiative includes energy audits, cost-effective measures, and financial support mechanisms.
e Standard to establish state building construction standards by January 1, 2020, that incorporate a nationally-recognized model for sustainable construction codes of high performance green buildings. Benchmarking: In 2014, DEEP was requir...
AI summary Connecticut has implemented energy benchmarking requirements for state buildings, mandating the use of the Energy Star Portfolio Manager and the EnergyCAP tool to track energy and water consumption. The state has benchmarked 42% of its buildings, with plans to expand the initiative further.
chmarking data. Additionally, Connecticut utilities have launched the Automated Data Transfer Project to benchmark municipal, board of education, houses of worship, and other local business buildings. The Institute for Sustainable Energy (...
AI summary Connecticut utilities have initiated the Automated Data Transfer Project to benchmark various local buildings. The Institute for Sustainable Energy (ISE) has established a Benchmarking Help Desk to assist towns, agencies, and schools with energy benchmarking and Portfolio Manager training. ISE has benchmarked over 900 buildings and provided technical assistance to multiple organizations, leading to energy-saving initiatives like LED lighting upgrades.
s a result of these efforts, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognized Energize Connecticut Partners as the 2017 Energy Star Partner of the Year for Energy Efficiency Program Delivery. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","CT St...
AI summary The document highlights Energize Connecticut Partners' recognition by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for energy efficiency efforts. It also outlines Connecticut's legislative requirements for state fleet acquisitions and energy management plans, including the establishment of the Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) Program to improve energy efficiency in state buildings.
pital. The costs of the energy retrofits are paid for by future guaranteed savings from utility and maintenance budgets. The new program, replaces the program ESPC program that existed prior to 2011. The State’s ESPC Program includes a num...
AI summary The State’s ESPC Program, which replaced the pre-2011 program, includes tools to minimize risk and simplify performance contracting. It features standardized contracts, pre-qualified ESCOs, and technical support. SB 334 revised the definition of 'cost effective' in 2016, extending the payback period and removing outdated requirements. There are currently 46 active ESPC projects in state and University of Connecticut buildings.
Last reviewed: August 2021 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: A proposal to conduct third party plan review and site studies has been approved by DEEP in its 2013-2015 C&LM draft decision. The Department of Construction Services a...
AI summary The document outlines a gap analysis and strategic compliance plan approved by DEEP in 2013-2015 for conducting third-party plan reviews and site studies. It also mentions baseline and updated compliance studies, including a 2018 code compliance study on single-family homes in Connecticut and a 2015 commercial and industrial compliance study by DNV-GL. These studies assess compliance rates and potential energy savings.
will conduct a baseline study. Although these findings have not been reported to date, they will be provided in a separate report. Additionally, NEEP completed a residential energy code compliance study in 2019/2020. Utility Involvement: U...
AI summary The document outlines efforts in Connecticut related to energy code compliance, including a baseline study, utility involvement in strategic planning, and training programs. The Connecticut General Statute (16-245m) requires utilities to submit a three-year Conservation and Management Plan, and the State collaborates with NEEP to implement the 2009 IECC. Stakeholder groups and certification requirements for building code officials are also discussed.
d separates distributed generation into three distinct tiers based upon system size. These tiers mirror those of FERC’s interconnection standards, upon which Connecticut’s standards are closely based. Connecticut's guidelines include a sta...
AI summary Connecticut's distributed generation guidelines are based on FERC's interconnection standards but include stricter requirements such as external disconnect switches and liability insurance. CHP systems are part of the state's Renewable Portfolio Standard, requiring a minimum operating efficiency of 50%. The state also provides long-term financing for customer-side distributed resources and has net metering regulations for renewable systems up to 2MW.
by Eversource, United Illuminating, Connecticut Natural Gas, and Southern Connecticut Gas. The utilities administer the programs and utilize a robust, highly-skilled green workforce to implement them. In 2007, the Connecticut legislature e...
AI summary Connecticut's energy efficiency initiatives, including the 2019-2021 Conservation & Load Management Plan, aim to achieve significant energy and cost savings, reduce emissions, and develop a green workforce. The legislation, starting with Public Act 07-242, prioritizes energy efficiency and established mechanisms like decoupling. The Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (DEEP) plays a central role in developing the Comprehensive Energy Strategy.
gy and Environmental Protection(DEEP) has initiated a process to refresh the integrated resource plan for 2020. A vendor has been selected and DEEP is anticipating to have final results by June 2020. Last reviewed: June 2020 ","Summary: Re...
AI summary The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) has initiated a process to refresh the integrated resource plan for 2020. A vendor has been selected, and DEEP anticipates final results by June 2020. The state's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requires 27% of retail load to come from renewable energy and energy efficiency by 2020. DEEP issued the 2018 Comprehensive Energy Strategy to advance Connecticut's energy goals, and the 2019-2021 Conservation & Load Management Plan focuses on energy efficiency in buildings.
21 Plan, the utilities also plan to introduce an MMBtu-based or a greenhouse gas emissions reductions-based metric for tracking purposes. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Guidelines for Third Party Access Under Gen. Stats. §16-245o(d) and Regul...
AI summary The document discusses energy use data policies in Connecticut, including third-party access requirements, public availability of non-residential building energy data, and the use of dashboards to track energy efficiency programs and consumption metrics. It also mentions the introduction of new metrics for tracking purposes.
for such projects if it can be accomplished at a reasonable cost. EO 18 also directs executive agencies and departments to procure at least 30% of their electricity load from clean, renewable sources. As an extension of the State's efforts...
AI summary Delaware joined the Better Buildings Challenge (BBC) in 2012, committing to energy reduction goals and tracking energy use in public buildings. The State meets BBC requirements by using EPA's Portfolio Manager and has been recognized for energy reporting for six consecutive years.
n system size and system type. Delaware Electric Cooperative has two tiers. All forms of CHP including fossil- and renewable-fueled systems of up to 10 MW are eligible for interconnection in Delaware. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","There is n...
AI summary The text discusses CHP eligibility in Delaware, including system size and type requirements, incentives through the Energy Efficiency Investment Fund, and the CHP Grant Pathway. It also mentions the State Revolving Loan Fund offering low-interest loans for qualifying CHP projects.
as formed to help guide the council on all aspects of EM&V, ensuring compliance of EM&V activities with the regulations, and striving for consistency in the execution of EM&V activities statewide. Further information on cost-effectiveness...
AI summary Delaware has established legislative energy savings targets through SB 106, setting up a Sustainable Energy Trust Fund to support energy efficiency programs. A portion of the fund is allocated to the Weatherization Assistance Program. Additionally, electric utility restructuring legislation from 1999 mandates Delmarva Power and Light to collect funds for low-income fuel assistance and weatherization programs.
from DC Government buildings are available in the Build Smart DC database. Results from privately-owned buildings are available in the District of Columbia Open Data Portal and via an interactive map. The District of Columbia mandated, in...
AI summary The District of Columbia requires electric and gas utilities to provide aggregated whole-building data to owners upon request, with the data available for download and automated upload to ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager®. The Clean Energy DC Act establishes a building energy performance standard (BEPS), which segments buildings by type and requires compliance through performance or prescriptive pathways.
iance. The Standard will be recalculated every five years and as smaller buildings are subject to the benchmarking requirements, they will also be required to comply with BEPS on a phased-in timeline. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","The Distri...
AI summary The District of Columbia has committed to reducing energy use in government buildings by 50% by 2032 through initiatives like the Better Buildings Challenge and Sustainable DC Plan. It has already achieved improvements of up to 25% in electricity consumption through retrofits and plans to implement a strategic energy management plan by 2020.
ategic energy management plan for reducing both energy & water use across their portfolio of government buildings by 2020, and codifies the 9% and 2.5% targets recommended by the Clean Energy DC Plan. In July 2008, the District of Columbia...
AI summary The District of Columbia implemented a strategic energy management plan targeting 9% and 2.5% reductions in energy and water use by 2020, supported by the Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008 and the Green Building Act of 2006. These laws mandate benchmarking, disclosure, and energy efficiency standards for public and private buildings, with the District also participating in the Better Buildings Challenge.
Last Reviewed: August 2021 "," Strategic Compliance Plan: DC has completed a Comprehensive Energy Plan, called Clean Energy DC, which was published November 2, 2017. Clean Energy DC provides a detailed roadmap that outlines long-term targe...
AI summary The District of Columbia has completed a Comprehensive Energy Plan called Clean Energy DC, aiming for net-zero energy in new construction by 2026. The Energy Code for the District includes specific language on net-zero buildings. Compliance studies and utility involvement support building energy code enforcement, with a 99% weighted compliance rate achieved in 2016.
uals, including architects, engineers, contractors, property managers, real estate developers and government regulators, contributed their time, through Technical Advisory Group meetings, to ensure the most appropriate codes possible. Othe...
AI summary The Green Building Act of 2006 mandates green building compliance, enforced by the Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs (DCRA). Training and outreach initiatives, including seminars and compliance tools, support project teams. The Urban Sustainability Administration (USA) provides grants for early design assistance in net-zero energy buildings, aligned with the Clean Energy DC plan aiming for net-zero energy building codes by 2026.
calls for net-zero energy building codes by 2026. Because there are few net-zero energy projects in the District, having more projects pursue net-zero energy will grow the number of available case studies and build the capacity of the deve...
AI summary The District of Columbia promotes net-zero energy buildings by 2026 and supports CHP through incentives and interconnection rules. However, there are limited policies to encourage CHP beyond these measures. The DCSGIR outlines interconnection regulations for systems up to 10 MW, and a tax credit is available for large cogeneration facilities.
s within the District. Owners of cogeneration equipment used for developments of more than one million square feet are eligible if the fuel used to generate power was previously subject to a D.C. tax. Net metering: District of Columbia Net...
AI summary The District of Columbia supports combined heat and power (CHP) through various policies, including net metering, technical assistance programs, and resiliency-centered microgrids. The DC Sustainable Energy Utility provides evaluation and review services, and the Public Service Commission is exploring a CHP-centered microgrid pilot project.
entered microgrids for critical infrastructure, which will use CHP. The DC Public Service Commission is also examining a potential CHP-centered microgrid pilot project which will provide resiliency. Last Updated: August 2019 ",9.5 out of 2...
AI summary The District of Columbia has implemented energy efficiency programs funded by a systems benefits charge, initially through the Reliable Energy Trust Fund and later replaced by the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund. The DCSEU administers these programs, with performance incentives and penalties tied to meeting energy efficiency targets.
, the DC Public Service Commission approved five demand-side management programs. These programs were initially implemented by Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO), the local investor-owned utility. In 2008, the District of Columbia enac...
AI summary The DC Public Service Commission approved demand-side management programs implemented by PEPCO. In 2008, the Clean and Affordable Energy Act replaced the Reliable Energy Trust Fund with the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund, administered by the District Department of the Environment. DCSEU, operated by VEIC since 2017, manages energy efficiency and renewable programs. Energy efficiency is a key focus in the Department of Energy & Environment's draft Comprehensive Energy Plan.
addition, DC SEU has been bidding aggregated energy efficiency measures into PJM's capacity market with DOEE's full support. For more information on energy efficiency as a resource, click here. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Summary: For FY20...
AI summary The DCSEU operates under a performance-based contract with DOEE, authorized by the Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008. It has multi-year contracts with targets expressed in BTUs, growing from 1,136,789 MMBtus in Year 1 to 6,820,733 MMBtus in Year 5. The DCSEU also participates in PJM's capacity market with DOEE's support.
e eligible for the performance incentives for electricity and natural gas, the VEIC is required to meet the minimum performance targets for reductions in both electricity and natural gas consumption. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","For custome...
AI summary The document outlines requirements for third-party access to energy use data in DC, including the use of the Green Button platform, benchmarking laws, and data access procedures for residential and commercial customers. It also mentions the availability of aggregated data for public buildings and the role of the DC Sustainable Energy Utility.
not have interval meters, but allows third parties to electronically access and download monthly utility data with customer consent via Utility portal. Requirements for Provision of Energy Use Data Aggregated benchmarked data that have bee...
AI summary The District of Columbia mandates the provision of aggregated energy use data, including automated benchmarking services, through the Sustainable DC Act of 2014. Pepco provides automated upload of whole building electricity data to Portfolio Manager, and utilities provide detailed energy consumption data by zip code. Interval meters are largely installed, allowing third parties to access collected data.
tionate impact of environmental hazards on vulnerable populations. This study will provide much needed information on the current status of energy equity within Florida, which has yet to be evaluated. The FDACS Office of Energy is looking...
AI summary The FDACS Office of Energy is working to promote energy equity through various programs, including the Florida Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Program, and is also supporting workforce development initiatives such as EnergyWhiz Events and the Youth Energy Academy. These efforts aim to reduce energy burden and promote clean energy education in Florida.
ce green building rating system as approved by the department. State agencies also must lease ENERGY STAR-rated buildings and employ energy saving performance contracts to upgrade existing facilities. In 2008, the Florida Legislature passe...
AI summary The Florida Energy Conservation and Sustainable Buildings Act of 2008 mandates state agencies to adopt sustainable building practices and energy efficiency measures. This includes leasing ENERGY STAR-rated buildings and using energy-saving performance contracts. The Florida Department of Management Services developed the Florida Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Program and the State Energy Management Plan to support energy reduction efforts. House Bill 7117 in 2012 added requirements for agencies to report energy use data for buildings over 5,000 square feet.
n energy use by each building owned or leased for state business 5,000 square feet or more. The statute requires that agencies collect energy usage and cost data, but does not specify a tracking tool. All State government-owned buildings l...
AI summary The text discusses Florida's energy use reporting requirements for state buildings over 5,000 square feet, including annual benchmarking and data collection. It also outlines executive orders and statutes requiring state agencies to prioritize fuel-efficient vehicle purchases and maintenance practices to reduce emissions.
f “renewable energy.” Some CHP systems may be interpreted as using “waste heat” as a primary fuel, but there is no wording that clearly defines CHP as eligible for interconnection using this standard. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","There are...
AI summary The text discusses the eligibility of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems in Florida for interconnection and incentives. It highlights that CHP systems may be considered renewable energy and are eligible for tax incentives, but there are no state policies specifically targeting CHP for energy savings or generation. The Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (FEECA) mandates energy-efficiency programs for utilities.
quires each utility to implement cost-effective energy-efficiency programs and to conduct energy audits. It also includes improving the efficiency of generation, transmission and distribution systems. FEECA also established the authority f...
AI summary FEECA requires utilities to implement energy-efficiency programs and conduct energy audits. The Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) sets energy and peak demand savings targets and may allow utilities to earn an additional return on equity for achieving energy efficiency goals. The FPSC reviewed and continued existing goals through 2024.
eeding 20% of their annual load-growth through energy efficiency measures. The FPSC may also assess penalties if utilities do not meet the goals. No utilities have yet requested the additional return. Last reviewed: June 2020 ","There is n...
AI summary The document outlines policies and initiatives in Florida, including the M-CORES Program for transportation and land-use integration, the absence of policies requiring utilities to release energy use data, and the state's dedicated revenue stream for transportation projects. No policies exist for VMT targets or freight energy reduction goals.
and maintenance. FAST Freight Plans and Goals: Florida has a state freight plan that identifies a multimodal freight network, but it does not include freight energy or greenhouse gas reduction goals. The Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) P...
AI summary Florida has a state freight plan focusing on multimodal transportation but lacks freight energy and greenhouse gas reduction goals. Public transit access is encouraged through incentives for low-income housing near transit facilities. The EV Roadmap and EVMP emphasize the role of transit in EV implementation, including targets for municipal and transit fleet electrification by 2025 and 2030.
nsure access for underserved customers or if they include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: September 2020 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2018 ","In April 2008,...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency policies in Georgia, including an executive order requiring state agencies to reduce energy use by 15% by 2020 and Senate Bill 130 mandating building commissioning and energy efficiency standards for new state buildings. It also notes the absence of a disclosure policy and state fleet efficiency initiatives.
se knowledge about clean energy and inspire a new generation of environmental stewards and clean energy leaders within the State. Last Updated: July 2021 "," Building type(s) affected: residential §508D-10.5 requires residential property o...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency requirements in Hawaii, including disclosure obligations for residential property owners and standards for state-owned buildings. It also highlights a public benchmarking project that identified significant energy savings potential.
et. The benchmarking project found potential for all state agencies to save more than 56 million kilowatt hours annually—the equivalent to saving more than $25 million using current electricity rates. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","House...
AI summary The benchmarking project identified significant energy savings potential for state agencies in Hawaii, with potential annual electricity savings of over 56 million kilowatt hours and $25 million in cost savings. House Bill 2175 promotes fuel-efficient vehicle purchases based on life-cycle cost-benefit analysis, and Hawaii Revised Statute 196-30 mandates energy efficiency retrofits through performance contracting. Hawaii has implemented large-scale ESPC projects, including a $158 million airport retrofit, yielding substantial energy savings.
cing: In July 2013, Hawaii enacted legislation allowing the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to issue Green Infrastructure Bonds for clean energy installations, including CHP. Net metering: Small biomass energy sys...
AI summary Hawaii has implemented policies to support clean energy and energy efficiency, including Green Infrastructure Bonds and a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) aiming for 100% renewable energy by 2045. Energy efficiency programs are managed by HECO and KIUC, with HECO using a public benefits charge to fund these initiatives. Hawaii collaborates with the U.S. Department of Energy to achieve 70% renewable and efficiency-based energy by 2030.
utility rates set by the Cooperative’s directors. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last Updated: August 2018 ","In 2008, H...
AI summary Hawaii's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) incorporates energy efficiency targets set by the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative (HCEI), aiming for 4,300 GWh of electricity savings by 2030, with 30% of the 70% clean energy goal coming from efficiency measures. The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) suspended and later reopened IRP dockets for utilities.
s Fund within their IRPs. Last Updated: August 2018 ","Summary: Cumulative electricity savings of 4,300 GWh by 2030 (equal to approximately 30% of forecast electricity sales, or 1.4% annual savings). Hawaii’s renewable portfolio standard (...
AI summary Hawaii's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) mandates increasing renewable energy usage, with energy efficiency and combined heat and power contributing up to 50% until 2014. After 2015, energy efficiency savings will count toward the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS), aiming for 4,300 GWh in savings by 2030. The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) is responsible for setting interim goals and rules for the EEPS.
ocal marginalized groups. The state does not currently include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Idaho statute...
AI summary The text discusses the absence of a disclosure policy in Idaho and the lack of specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. It also outlines Idaho's building code requirements and the use of Energy Star Portfolio Manager for tracking energy use in government buildings, though participation is voluntary. Additionally, it mentions the Performance Contracting Program administered by the Department of Administration.
e Energy Circuit Rider. The Idaho Code Collaborative includes the Office of Energy and Mineral Resources, the state’s electric investor-owned utilities, and the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. Last Updated: July 2021 ",,"The state ha...
AI summary Idaho has limited policies to encourage CHP deployment, with no interconnection standards or state-wide policies to acquire energy savings or generation from CHP. Some financing options exist, such as low-interest energy loans and the Renewable Energy Project Bond Program. Energy efficiency programs are administered by investor-owned utilities under the oversight of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission.
en Governor Quinn signed Executive Order 7 to better coordinate energy savings activities in State government. Executive Order No. 7 sets a goal of a 20% energy reduction by 2020 for state facilities. Specifically, EO 7 directed the Depart...
AI summary Governor Quinn signed Executive Order 7 to reduce state energy use by 20% by 2020. The order established an Energy Efficiency Committee and directed the Department of Central Management Services to implement energy efficiency programs. Public Act 96-0896 mandated a pilot study to benchmark and label state buildings for energy efficiency, which was completed in 2013.
ercentage of all public buildings. Flagship buildings (James R. Thompson Center, Michael A. Bilandic Building) and some template buildings (e.g. ISP district offices) have done benchmarking thus far. Illinois' Green Buildings Act (20 ILCS...
AI summary Illinois' Green Buildings Act mandates green building certifications for new state-funded construction and renovations. The state also set goals to reduce petroleum use by 20% by 2012, requiring agencies to increase the purchase of hybrid and electric vehicles and reduce fuel consumption through various strategies.
ogram staff oversaw the implementation of over $491 million in energy efficient capital improvements through performance contract arrangements resulting in over $35 million in combined annual savings. The state has recently entered into a...
AI summary The state has implemented energy performance contracts (ESPCs) for public facilities, resulting in over $35 million in annual savings. A new contract for six Department of Human Services' facilities in Chicago is expected to save $10 million annually. The State Energy Office supports ESPCs through technical assistance and has issued an RFP for streetlight replacements as a master contract.
es in the Chicago region, with guaranteed energy savings valued at $10 million. The state is exploring additional energy performance contract opportunities at Department of Corrections' facilities. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","The Univ...
AI summary The University of Illinois at Chicago’s Energy Resources Center (UIC-ERC) focuses on energy conservation and production, providing practical energy solutions through audits, modeling, and consultations. The Center collaborates with various organizations and receives funding from public and private entities. The Illinois Sustainable Technology Center also promotes sustainability through energy efficiency and research.
Last reviewed: July 2019 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The State Energy Office (Illinois Dept. of Commerce and Economic Opportunity) worked with BCAP to complete a gap analysis in 2010 and a strategic compliance plan in 2011....
AI summary The Illinois State Energy Office has conducted multiple studies on building code compliance rates, including a 2010 baseline study and an updated 2014 evaluation. Compliance rates for residential buildings were found to be 79% and 81.3%, while commercial compliance rates were not fully determined due to lack of participation. Utilities are involved in training and technical assistance programs, and the Energy Codes Enhancement Program is forming a Stakeholder Advisory Committee.
he Future Energy Jobs Bill (SB 2814), raising overall utility energy efficiency targets to require ComEd and Ameren to achieve cumulative 21.5% and 16% reductions in energy use, respectively, by 2030. Illinois established a natural gas EER...
AI summary Illinois passed SB 2814, which raised utility energy efficiency targets and increased the cost cap for energy efficiency programs. The legislation shifted program administration to utilities and transitioned goals to focus on long-term cumulative savings. Natural gas energy efficiency programs were also established with specific savings targets.
first-year savings to goals related to longer-term cumulative persistent annual savings. The utilities also offer on-bill financing opportunities to their customers for energy efficiency measures. Section 16-111.5B of the Illinois Public U...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Illinois, referencing statutory provisions that allow for additional procurement of cost-effective energy efficiency measures. It highlights the increase in utility expenditures on these programs and mentions the approval of a new 5-year energy efficiency plan. Budgets for these programs and their savings are referenced in State Spending and Savings Tables.
energy efficiency plan in ICC Docket No. 13-0423. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Illinois le...
AI summary The text discusses Illinois legislation (SB 1592) that mandates electric and natural gas utilities to use cost-effective energy efficiency and demand-response measures to reduce consumer costs and avoid infrastructure investments. It also outlines policy requirements from the Illinois Public Utilities Act (PUA) for both electric and natural gas utilities.
ross (NTG) framework. See also 220 ILCS 5/8-103B for electric, effective June 1, 2017, and 220 ILCS 5/8-104 for natural gas utility evaluation. Evaluations are conducted for each of the utilities. According to the Database of State Efficie...
AI summary Illinois uses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) benefit-cost test as its primary cost-effectiveness screening method for energy efficiency programs, with the utility cost test (UCT) as a secondary test. The state's framework accounts for avoided costs of greenhouse gas emissions compliance and environmental impacts. The Illinois Statewide Technical Reference Manual for Energy Efficiency is updated annually and became effective January 1, 2018.
te Approaches to Account for Health and Environmental Benefits of Energy Efficiency. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Requirements for State and Utility Support of Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs In December 2016, the Illinois State Legis...
AI summary The Future Energy Jobs Bill (SB 2814) in Illinois mandates electric utilities to implement low-income energy efficiency programs with specific funding requirements. The legislation also excludes these programs from the total resource cost-effectiveness (TRC) test. The Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity administers weatherization funds through the Illinois Home Weatherization Assistance Program (IHWAP), which is supported by multiple funding sources including DOE WAP, HHS grants, and state-level charges.
nsure access for underserved customers or if they include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: September 2020 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2017 ","Executive Orde...
AI summary The text outlines policies related to energy efficiency in state buildings and fleets, including building standards, energy savings contracts, and fleet initiatives. It notes the absence of specific disclosure policies and emphasizes mandatory requirements for energy efficiency in construction and renovation projects.
es ESPCs entered into by state buildings on the main campus. Agencies with their facilities, such as prisons and hospitals, manage their own ESPCs with input from the Office of Management and Budget. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","The En...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency initiatives in Indiana, including compliance with the 2018 IECC and ASHRAE 90.1-2007 standards, the formation of the Energy Efficiency and Reliability Center at Purdue University Calumet, and the use of Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) by state agencies. It also highlights the mandatory Indiana Energy Conservation Code and LEED certification requirements for new state buildings.
de references ASHRAE standard 90.1-2007 as of May 6, 2010. Executive Order 08-14, signed by Governor Mitch Daniels on June 28, 2008, requires all new state buildings to earn LEED silver certification. Last Reviewed: September 2019 "," Gap...
AI summary The document outlines Indiana's interconnection standards for CHP systems, noting that while CHP is eligible for interconnection, there are no additional policies to encourage CHP development or energy savings. Net metering is available for systems up to 1 MW, but CHP is not eligible. Training has been provided on energy conservation codes, but no trainings were held in 2015.
statewide approach offered by all regulated electric utilities. Utilities also implemented additional programs outside of the shared Energizing Indiana programs, which were called Core Plus programs. SB 340 eliminated Energizing Indiana, a...
AI summary SB 340 eliminated the Energizing Indiana program and replaced it with individual utility plans. Utilities like Duke, Vectren, IPL, I&M, and NIPSCO continue with their energy efficiency programs, while some natural gas utilities suspended theirs. Energy efficiency plans must be submitted every three years as per SEA 412.
th new plans slated to run 2019-2021. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables on the left. Last Updated: October 2018 ","Under cur...
AI summary Electric utilities in Indiana are required to submit resource and energy efficiency plans under the Indiana Administrative Code, with recent changes aligning these requirements with SEA 412. The updated rules require integrated resource plans and energy efficiency plans to be submitted periodically and include EM&V procedures conducted by independent third-party administrators.
by the state. IEDA provided funding to the Prison Industries Training Program, an effort to train incarcerated Iowans in construction, with an emphasis on energy efficiency and high performing homes. The State Energy Plan has four pillars,...
AI summary The document discusses the Iowa Energy Workforce Consortium, established by Iowa utilities to address workforce needs in the energy sector, and outlines the State Energy Plan's focus on economic development and energy careers. It also mentions the requirement for public buildings to comply with the 2012 IECC code and the use of LCCA for energy equipment in public facilities.
line. Industrial Revenue Bonds: State and local government-issued bonds to finance industrial buildings, as defined by KRS 103.200. This financing can cover the cost of energy efficiency projects. Local Government Efficiency Retrofit Progr...
AI summary The text discusses financing mechanisms for energy efficiency, such as Industrial Revenue Bonds and the Local Government Efficiency Retrofit Program, as well as legislative measures like House Bill 2 and House Bill 299, which promote high-performance building standards and energy-efficient HVAC equipment.
buildings could be added to CEMCS. Current state policy is to publicly disclose building performance for all buildings in the CEMCS as they are added to the system, and as the budget allows over time. Currently, 0% of buildings are benchma...
AI summary The text discusses building energy management in Kentucky, highlighting the Commonwealth Energy Management and Control System (CEMCS) and the lack of mandatory policies for fleet efficiency. It also mentions the use of Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) by state agencies.
s. Last Updated: September 2019 ",,"Few policies are in place that encourage the deployment of CHP systems. No new CHP systems were installed in 2018. ","Policy: Kentucky Interconnection Standard Description: Applicable only to systems pow...
AI summary Kentucky has limited policies encouraging CHP deployment, with no new systems installed in 2018. The interconnection standard applies only to small biomass or biogas systems. Net metering for CHP is limited to 30kW systems and was shifted to a net billing arrangement in 2020. Technical assistance and feasibility studies are being conducted to promote CHP deployment.
tudies are conducted to help assess the potential for CHP in public buildings and at other sites in Kentucky. CHP projects could also qualify for expedited permitting through Kentucky's EXCEL program. The State Energy Office currently incl...
AI summary Kentucky's 2007 Energy Act and subsequent legislation, such as HB 240, promoted energy efficiency and demand-side management (DSM) programs. However, a 2018 public service commission order significantly reduced Kentucky Power’s DSM funding, leading to a decline in statewide electric savings. The State Energy Office collaborates on initiatives like the Sustainable Spirits program and provides training on combined heat and power (CHP) and biogas projects.
ncluded. Louisiana has also contracted for the installation of GPS monitoring in all state vehicles to ensure efficient utilization and prevent excessive idle time, speeding, and unnecessary travel. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ","Louisia...
AI summary Louisiana has implemented GPS monitoring in state vehicles for efficiency and uses ESPCs for energy efficiency. Energy codes for residential and commercial buildings are based on IECC and ASHRAE standards. The University of Louisiana-Lafayette runs an energy assessment program with state funding.
ow-income programs. Cost-Effectiveness Rules for Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs No specific adjustments or exceptions to general cost-effectiveness rules are in place for low-income programs. In its original Quick Start portfolio fi...
AI summary The document discusses low-income energy efficiency programs in Louisiana, noting that no specific cost-effectiveness adjustments apply to them. Entergy submitted an income-qualified program that initially failed the TRC test but was later revised and approved. The Louisiana Public Service Commission authorized an LCFC mechanism for efficiency programs in its Quick Start rules, which was implemented by electric utilities starting in 2014. There is no state-level policy to decouple utility profits from sales.
cerning policies, practices, and specific actions that the Commonwealth should implement to ensure that the objectives of Executive Order 552 are accomplished. Goals and metrics for tracking progress In addition to its oversight role throu...
AI summary The document discusses the oversight role of MA DOER in tracking progress towards energy efficiency goals, including the development of outcomes for the Massachusetts Residential Conservation Services (RCS) program. It also outlines the formation of an inter-agency workgroup to assess cumulative environmental impacts on environmental justice populations as mandated by Chapter 8 of the Acts of 2021.
quantitative method by which cumulative impacts can be measured, such that state agencies may utilize this information in permitting, siting, grant disbursement, enforcement and other state functions. With respect to development of the 202...
AI summary The text discusses the need for quantitative methods to measure cumulative impacts for state agencies and outlines recommendations from the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) for the 2022-2024 Three Year Energy Efficiency Plan, including data collection on barriers and service equity.
he Green Jobs Academy is a Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Network Verified Weatherization Training Center and provides training approved by the Massachusetts Utilities Program Administrators. Building Operator Training. MassCEC is...
AI summary The Green Jobs Academy is a Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) training center in Massachusetts. DOER is piloting a Building Asset Rating (BAR) protocol and participating in HELIX to make home energy score data accessible. SB 2746 mandates home energy audit disclosure for home buyers.
S after completing efficiency upgrades. In 2018, Governor Baker introduced bill number H. 4371 in the Massachusetts Legislature that would require home energy scorecards to be part of an MLS listing. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Massachuset...
AI summary Massachusetts has implemented several green building initiatives, including Executive Order 484 (2007), which mandates energy consumption reductions in state buildings, and the Green Communities Act (S.B. 2768) of 2008, requiring energy efficiency and renewable energy use in new state buildings. These efforts have led to significant energy savings and the certification of multiple LEED buildings.
tionally, the Green Communities Act (S.B. 2768) of 2008 mandates that new buildings owned or operated by the state must minimize their life-cycle costs by using energy efficiency and renewable energy. Since 2013, the Division of Capital As...
AI summary The Green Communities Act of 2008 requires state-owned or operated buildings to minimize life-cycle costs through energy efficiency and renewable energy. Since 2013, DCAMM has completed 82 energy projects across 35 million square feet, saving $14.8 million annually and reducing GHG emissions by 41,000 metric tons. The Commonwealth Energy Intelligence program has expanded to include 200 new meters and 7 million square feet of additional building area.
lities with customized electricity, natural gas, and oil usage information to allow local officials to understand where their departments and buildings are wasting energy and act to reduce that waste. The State’s Leading by Example program...
AI summary Massachusetts uses the Leading by Example program with three databases to track energy use in state facilities, including LBE, MassEnergyInsight, and CBEI. The state participates in the Better Buildings Challenge, achieving a 15% reduction in source EUI since 2009 with a goal of 20% by 2022.
llion in annual energy costs, respectively. In 2016, Massachusetts surpassed its commitment for the ESPC Accelerator and was named one of the Energy Steward Champions by the Energy Services Coalition. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The Massac...
AI summary Massachusetts has made significant strides in energy efficiency through various initiatives, including the ESPC Accelerator and the Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Partnership (MAEEP). The state has also established the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (CEERE) and the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (CEC) to support innovation and technology demonstration in the energy sector.
rogram is identifying a small subset of companies that have products ready to go to market and will work closely with state partners to identify potential host sites for both pilots and installations. Massachusetts also supports an extensi...
AI summary Massachusetts is supporting clean energy R&D and market development through various incubators and programs like the Clean Energy Extension (CEE). The state has adopted updated energy codes, including the 2018 IECC and ASHRAE 90.1-2016, and continues to expand the stretch energy code. The Next Generation Roadmap for Climate Policy legislation aims to develop an opt-in net-zero stretch code.
doption since 2015.Stretch code towns have slightly higher average compliance rates than do base code towns. Non-program has remained constant since 2015 at 88% despite an increase in code stringency. The residential study methodology esse...
AI summary The document discusses Massachusetts' energy efficiency programs, including the use of HERS ratings for compliance assessments, utility involvement in code compliance initiatives, and training efforts. It also outlines policies supporting CHP deployment, such as incentives and interconnection standards.
o provide energy efficiency programs during its restructuring of the industry in 1997. The natural gas utilities in the state have offered energy efficiency programs to customers since the late 1980s. In 2008, the governor signed Chapter 1...
AI summary The text discusses the evolution of energy efficiency programs in Massachusetts, starting with the restructuring of the industry in 1997 and the introduction of the Green Communities Act in 2008. The Act established requirements for utility energy efficiency plans and created the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC). In 2018, the state further advanced clean energy initiatives with the passage of Chapter 227, addressing climate and technological challenges.
m the Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Advisory Council, a stakeholder body chaired by the state Department of Energy Resources (DOER). The Department of Public Utilities has regulatory responsibility. All investor-owned gas and electric ut...
AI summary The Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) oversees energy efficiency programs, including the Mass Save® program, which is sponsored by investor-owned utilities and energy efficiency administrators. At least 10% of electric and 20% of gas efficiency funds must be allocated to low-income residential programs. Program budgets and savings data are available online.
gets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found at MassSaveData.com. Detailed information is available at the state Savings and Spending tables at ma-eeac.org. Last reviewed: August 2020 ","The Gree...
AI summary The Green Communities Act mandates that utilities prioritize cost-effective energy efficiency over supply resources. It established the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) to coordinate 3-year planning cycles. A 2021 act set a 2050 net-zero emissions target and specific GHG reduction goals for Mass Save programs, requiring 504,000 metric tons of CO2e reduction from electric utilities and 341,000 metric tons from natural gas programs between 2022-24.
24. The 2008 Green Communities Act requires that electric and gas utilities procure all cost-effective energy efficiency before more expensive supply resources, requiring a three-year planning cycle. In January 2019, the DPU approved the f...
AI summary The 2008 Green Communities Act mandates that electric and gas utilities procure cost-effective energy efficiency before more expensive supply resources. The 2019-2021 Mass Save plan set ambitious energy savings targets, and the 2022–24 plan emphasizes electrification, equity, and workforce development in response to climate legislation aiming for net-zero emissions by 2050. Specific GHG reduction goals were established for electric and natural gas programs.
d cumulative savings over the next decade. Last reviewed: April 2022 "," Primary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: total resource cost Secondary cost-effectiveness test(s) used: none The evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency prog...
AI summary Massachusetts evaluates energy efficiency programs using the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test, guided by legislative mandates like the Green Communities Act of 2008 and regulatory orders such as DPU 8-50-A. The state's approach includes assessing both energy and non-energy benefits, including health and economic impacts, and uses an electronic Technical Reference Manual for evaluation methods.
ocess to develop a statewide energy efficiency database that would potentially include customer energy use data, but there is no regulation in place to date. Requirements for Provision of Energy Data To date, there is no regulation in plac...
AI summary The document discusses the lack of statewide regulation for energy data provision in Massachusetts, highlighting the availability of estimated annual aggregate sales data through MassSaveData.com and the presence of building disclosure ordinances in Boston and Cambridge. It also notes that 86% of electric and 71% of gas customers have access to Green Button data through voluntary utility participation.
gy Administration also offers an Offshore Wind Workforce Training program; the program made $3M in awards in FY20 and $656K in FY21. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","House Bill...
AI summary Maryland's energy efficiency initiatives include an Offshore Wind Workforce Training program, energy savings goals for State-owned buildings, and a High Performance Green Building Program requiring new buildings to meet specific green building standards. The state has 27 active energy performance contracts with significant annual savings and CO2 reduction benefits.
rent International Green Construction Code (IGCC), or Two Globes of the Green Building Institute’s Green Globes program. There are a few exceptions for facilities like warehouses and pumping stations. Maryland's Department of General Servi...
AI summary Maryland's Department of General Services has established a baseline for energy use in state-owned facilities and uses the EnergyCAP database to benchmark building performance, track energy usage, and identify opportunities for improvement. The database includes utility data from over 50 agencies and tracks energy use intensity (EUI) for analysis.
location, commodity, meter, or account. Facility details including area (in square feet), service address, build date, primary use, geographic coordinates, and weather station data are also captured. As a result of the executive order that...
AI summary Maryland's executive order mandates a 10% energy savings goal for state-owned buildings, with EUI calculations underway. Additionally, the Clean Cars Act of 2019 established a Zero Emissions Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Council to develop procurement practices that include lifecycle cost evaluations for ZEVs. Budgets for the State Fleet Electric Vehicle Program are allocated for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
, the Department of Labor is required to adopt the new codes within 18 months. After adoption, all local jurisdictions have up to 12 months to amend & adopt these new codes for local code enforcement. Last reviewed: July 2021 "," Baseline...
AI summary Maryland has conducted compliance studies on energy codes, with high compliance rates in Howard and Montgomery counties. A Codes Compliance Work Group was established to improve compliance, and a prior U.S. DOE award supported training and outreach efforts. A final report on the efficacy of energy code training is being finalized by PNNL.
5 and a new energy efficiency goal of 2% of annual retail sales beginning from 2018 was established. Electricity savings generated from CHP systems are eligible to be counted toward the savings goals. CHP resource acquisition programs: Uti...
AI summary Maryland utilities are implementing CHP programs to meet energy efficiency goals set by the EmPOWER Maryland Efficiency Act of 2008. These programs offer financial incentives, such as $0.07/kWh for net electricity produced, to encourage the adoption of CHP systems by commercial and industrial customers.
6 and through 2023, utilities must ramp up programs by 0.2% per year, leveling out at 2% incremental savings per year as a percent of 2016 weather-normalized gross retail sales and electricity losses. The EmPOWER Maryland Energy Efficiency...
AI summary Maryland's EmPOWER Act of 2008 set energy efficiency targets for utilities, requiring them to achieve 10% of a 15% per-capita electricity reduction goal by 2015. Utilities met the energy savings goal but fell short of the peak demand reduction target. Legislative goals were achieved by 2015, though the demand reduction goal was not fully met.
quire the provision of energy use data. Energy Use Data Availability The state does not have a standardized system through which access to individual or aggregated energy use data may be requested. Last Updated: July 2018 ",9.5 out of 12,"...
AI summary The state lacks a standardized system for requesting individual or aggregated energy use data. Maryland has adopted California's ZEV program and Cal LEV III standards, and has implemented smart growth policies to integrate transportation and land use planning, including significant investment in mass transit.
reer pathway in energy efficiency construction and shall include a certification that is broadly recognized, transparent, and portable. The plans are due to the VT General Assembly by October 1, 2021. Last Updated: July 2021 ","Act 89 of 2...
AI summary Vermont is working on establishing energy efficiency construction certification and building energy disclosure tools. Act 89 of 2013 mandates a working group to develop these tools, and the state has made progress with residential disclosure tools. The Public Service Department must report on the effectiveness of voluntary disclosure efforts by 2016, and legislation is pending to make energy disclosure mandatory.
ng energy disclosure requirements and re-establishes the Residential and Commercial Building Energy Labeling Working Groups. As of May 2019, this bill had not yet been sent to the Governor for action. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","The 2016 S...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency and climate change initiatives in Vermont, including energy disclosure requirements, building energy labeling working groups, and goals to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from state government operations by specific percentages by set years.
law requires the Vermont Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to set budgets at a level that require the program administrators to realize ""all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency."" The most recent budgets for energy effi...
AI summary The Vermont Public Utilities Commission (PUC) is required by law to set energy efficiency budgets that ensure the realization of all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency. Vermont established a statewide energy efficiency utility (EEU) model in 1999, with Efficiency Vermont (EVT) and Burlington Electric Department (BED) operating under this designation. Natural gas efficiency programs are also supported by legislation and regulation, beginning in 1993. Act 56 of 2015 introduced a Renewable Energy Standard, requiring electric utilities to reduce fossil fuel use through efficiency measures, starting in 2017.
2% of the utility's sales, rising to 10% by 2032. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: June 2020 ","Vermont sta...
AI summary Vermont requires utilities to prepare least cost integrated plans to meet energy needs at the lowest lifecycle cost, including energy efficiency programs. Energy Efficiency Utility budgets are set to realize all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency. Recent energy efficiency savings include 357,400 MWh of electricity and 192,599 Mcf of natural gas over 2018-2020.
r integration of forecasting (EEU Structure Docket 7466). Every 6 years there is a performance review for the three EEUs to determine if each appointment should be extended for an additional 6 years. In addition to the EEU Structure the st...
AI summary The document discusses the structure and performance review cycle of Energy Efficiency Utilities (EEUs) in Vermont, the Renewable Energy Standard (Act 56) requiring distribution utilities to reduce fossil fuel use, and the evaluation of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs under legislative and regulatory frameworks.
support energy efficiency projects in their facilities. The ESA is run through the Efficiency Vermont program and related savings are reported and verified through the Savings Verification mechanism. For CCP, eligible customers must be ISO...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Vermont, including the Energy Savings Accounts (ESA) run through Efficiency Vermont and the Customer Credit Program (CCP) which requires ISO 14001 certification. It also mentions a pilot program allowing selected customers to direct funds from the electric EEC toward energy efficiency projects. VEIC is highlighted as the operator of most state programs and is eligible for performance incentives based on energy savings goals.
period January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, VEIC can earn up to $4,543,500 for meeting electric energy savings goals and other performance goals including peak savings, and total resource benefits. Vermont statute (30 VSA Sec. 218c) dire...
AI summary The text outlines Vermont's energy efficiency regulations, including statutory requirements for utilities to develop least-cost integrated plans and the decoupling mechanisms for IOUs. It also discusses Act 62 of 2019, which mandates the aggregation and release of energy usage data for multiunit buildings.
ity providers, and community stakeholders every month to address low-income specific issues with the goal of enhancing available initiatives so they may better serve the needs of low-income customers. One of the five pillars of Michigan's...
AI summary The text discusses Michigan's efforts to address low-income energy needs through stakeholder engagement and the Pay it Forward pillar of the Just Transition plan, which focuses on creating clean energy jobs and workforce development. It also mentions Public Act 295, which aims to reduce state government energy purchases by 25% by 2015 through energy efficiency measures and the use of LEED standards.
ic, mandatory requirement for increasing state fleet efficiency. State alternative-fuel vehicle procurement requirements that give a voluntary option to count efficient vehicles are thus not included. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","PA 625 was...
AI summary PA 625, enacted in 2012, promotes energy savings performance contracts in Michigan by designating the Department of Technology, Management and Budget as the lead agency. It requires the assembly of qualified energy service providers and the development of standardized contracts and documents. The legislation also allows for fees and outlines cost-savings measures, with municipalities receiving technical assistance for energy efficiency projects.
iency opportunities when planning or renovating a building owned or operated by the State; reduce energy use 40% by 2040; make all major renovations of buildings and facilities carbon neutral by 2040. Last reviewed: July 2021 "," Baseline...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency goals for state-owned buildings, including reducing energy use by 40% by 2040 and achieving carbon neutrality in major renovations by 2040. It also discusses a compliance study and the Michigan Energy Code Compliance Collaborative, which involves stakeholders in improving energy code compliance. The pandemic affected training and outreach efforts in 2020.
ainties in how the pandemic would affect tax revenue led to statewide budget freezes. With no funding to support trainings or resource development there was no action taken on code education in 2020. Last reviewed: July 2021 ",,"The state...
AI summary Due to uncertainties in pandemic-related tax revenue, Michigan implemented budget freezes, halting code education efforts in 2020. The state has an interconnection standard for CHP systems, which are eligible under the renewable energy standard, but there are no state policies to acquire energy savings or provide incentives for CHP deployment.
Pilot for Combined Heat and Power (TAP CHP) offers assistance to facilities to complete feasibility studies and trainings. A CHP training event targeting hospitals and universities drew 102 attendees. Last Updated: August 2019 ",13 out of...
AI summary Michigan's energy efficiency efforts have grown since 2008 with the establishment of an energy efficiency resource standard. Prior to this, programs were discontinued in 1995. Public Act 295 of 2008 revived energy efficiency programs, requiring providers to file energy waste reduction programs with the MPSC. Recent legislation, PA 341 and PA 342, increased efficiency targets and removed spending caps.
significantly above the statutory minimum (link). The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: August 2020 ","Legislati...
AI summary Public Act 295, passed in 2008, reestablished utility energy efficiency programs in Michigan. The MPSC must ensure that proposed plans meet the utility system resource cost test and are reasonable and prudent. Recent IRPs have set higher savings targets for utilities. Utilities must offer energy efficiency programs across all customer sectors, and large customers may be exempt from surcharges if approved.
lity financial incentives under PA 342 have spurred utilities to pursue upwards of 1.5% annual electric savings. And recent IRPs approved for Consumers and DTE call for 2% savings for 2021 and beyond. Michigan adopted an EERS in October 20...
AI summary Michigan's EERS, established by the Clean, Renewable, and Efficient Energy Act, requires utilities to achieve annual energy savings targets. These targets have been maintained and extended by PA 342, which also removed a spending cap and introduced credit banking rules for energy waste reduction.
Last Updated: July 2021 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: Minnesota completed a gap analysis in October 2014 with the Building Code Assistance Project. Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Completed in 2018, the Minnesota Cente...
AI summary Minnesota has completed several studies and initiatives related to energy code compliance, including a gap analysis, baseline studies, and training programs. A collaborative effort involving utilities, stakeholders, and organizations is working on a C&S Roadmap to support energy efficiency and utility participation in code-related activities.
cedures applicable to all investor-owned utilities, apply to systems up to 10 MW in size, and include CHP systems. Several aspects of the review process are different depending on the size of system. Last Updated: July 2018 ","CHP in energ...
AI summary The text discusses policies related to combined heat and power (CHP) systems in Minnesota, including the Next Generation Energy Act (NGEA) and modifications to energy conservation improvement definitions. It also covers net metering laws and supportive policies for renewable-fueled CHP, including a CHP Action Plan developed with stakeholder input.
entation of CHP in the state. In 2016, the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) published a case study documenting Minnesota's experience that can serve as a model for other states. Last Updated: July 2018 ",13 out of 20,...
AI summary Minnesota has a long history of energy efficiency programs, supported by legislation like the Next Generation Energy Act and the Energy Conservation and Optimization Act. These programs have achieved significant savings and are integrated into the state's regulatory framework, including performance incentives and integrated resource plans filed with the Public Utilities Commission.
ies Commission. The plans identify the potential resources the utilities intend to use to meet consumer needs in future years. The plans include significant energy efficiency and conservation savings. On May 19, 2010, the Minnesota 2009 En...
AI summary The Minnesota 2009 Energy Policy Act and subsequent legislation, such as H.F. 729, established energy efficiency as a preferred resource and mandated minimum annual savings goals for utilities. The 2007 Next Generation Energy Act (NGEA) introduced the state’s first Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program (EERS), setting 1.5% annual savings targets for electricity and natural gas, with exemptions for small utilities and large customers.
o exempt small utilities under a certain customer threshold. About 13% of electric load and gas sales are also exempt from efficiency programs due to the state’s opt-out provision for large customers. In 2021, the state enacted the Energy...
AI summary The 2021 Energy Conservation and Optimization (ECO) Act strengthened the state's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Standards (EERS), increasing utility savings targets and expanding the scope of energy-saving measures. It also introduced load management and fuel-switching incentives to promote beneficial electrification and energy efficiency.
alls for a State Energy Management Advisory Board comprised of selected agencies and led by the ENRD to meet at least once a year in order to review implementation of the State Energy Management Plan. Mississippi Senate Bill 3007 requires...
AI summary Mississippi Senate Bill 3007 mandates energy efficiency measures for state-funded construction and renovations. The state also requires its fleet to meet specific fuel economy standards and encourages the use of alternative fuels. Public entities can engage in Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) with pre-qualified ESCOs to achieve energy savings and capital improvements.
tinely engages in informational and technical assistance campaigns to increase the utilization of ESPCs as a means to acheive energy savings and capital improvement for Mississippi's public entities. Last Updated: July 2020 ","The Energy I...
AI summary Mississippi engages in energy efficiency initiatives through the Energy Institute at Mississippi State University, which focuses on combined heating and power, energy audits, and biomass technologies. The state has a voluntary residential energy code and updated commercial codes to ASHRAE 90.1-2010, with opportunities for jurisdictions to adopt stricter standards. Additionally, the Smart Business Act provides rebates for corporations collaborating with state universities on energy-related research.
de for commercial and state-owned buildings. These codes training sessions complement the work of MDA by leveraging a network of officials to educate and implement the building energy code standard. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ",,"The st...
AI summary The text discusses the lack of state policies in Mississippi to encourage CHP deployment and the absence of interconnection standards for CHP systems. It also mentions the Mississippi Public Service Commission's energy efficiency rules implemented in 2013, which require investor-owned utilities to implement energy efficiency programs.
ng Practices (DSESP), a resource of the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP). Last Updated: August 2019 ","Requirements for State and Utility Support of Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs No specific required spending or savings...
AI summary The text discusses Mississippi's energy efficiency policies, including the absence of specific cost-effectiveness rules for low-income programs, the lack of self-direct or opt-out programs, and the integration of energy efficiency into an updated Integrated Resource Planning and Reporting rule. It also notes the absence of policies to release energy use data and transportation-related policies.
l, regardless of cost-effectiveness, of energy savings from low-income demand-side programs. Energy savings from multi-family buildings that house low-income households may count toward this target."" DE anticipates the inclusion of clean...
AI summary The document discusses DE's initiatives to support low-income demand-side programs, workforce development in clean energy, and energy efficiency in public and agricultural sectors. It highlights efforts such as grant programs, energy audits, and low-interest loans to reduce energy costs and support workforce training.
s gathering input on the criteria and design of the certification that includes home energy ratings and highly efficient energy assets based on the 2012 IECC. The MHEC rolled out on February 20, 2015. In addition, the Division of Energy wo...
AI summary The Division of Energy in Missouri is gathering input on home energy certification criteria based on the 2012 IECC. The MHEC was launched in 2015, and the Division is transitioning to the Green Building Registry to store and share green home data with real estate entities. Over 4,800 homes have been assessed, and a continuing education course for real estate professionals is being developed and updated for online access.
ues including resources and efficiency of their use, processing facilities, generation facilities and the entire energy infrastructure needed as well as ensuring the sustainability of our environment. Mid?America Regional Council (MARC) ha...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency initiatives in Missouri, including the Regional Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy (REECS) Initiative led by Mid?America Regional Council (MARC), and the adoption of energy codes across the state. Missouri, as a home-rule state, has no mandatory statewide codes, but about 50% of its population is covered by the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) or equivalent codes.
Last Reviewed: July 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Missouri completed a compliance study of residential energy codes with the Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. PNNL analysis is complete for all but the Manual J measure....
AI summary Missouri conducted a compliance study of residential energy codes with the Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, estimating a 64.6% compliance rate. The Division of Energy is developing a compliance plan for submission to DOE. Ameren Missouri committed to funding a building codes circuit rider, and the Division of Energy encourages utility stakeholder advisory groups to engage in building code compliance efforts.
ry groups meet separately at least quarterly. Training/Outreach: The Division of Energy has developed a resource page dedicated to building codes compliance training with assistance from MEEA: Link. Last reviewed: July 2021 ",,"Missouri pr...
AI summary Missouri promotes combined heat and power (CHP) for critical infrastructure and renewable-fueled CHP under its renewable energy standard. The Division of Energy (DE) has implemented various initiatives, including training, outreach, and participation in CHP partnerships. Net metering and interconnection standards are also in place for small-scale systems.
engineered and assembled systems from proven service providers. The eCatalog will serve in a powerful way to reduce the perceived risk associated with the performance of unknown (to them) technology. In partnership with Spire, the Departme...
AI summary The Department of Energy partnered with Spire to host CHP resiliency summits and provided technical assistance to critical facilities. They also filed testimony in multiple Missouri Public Service Commission cases, leading to improved Standby Service Rider tariffs and the development of tools for customers to estimate utility charges from cogeneration.
ing, in August 2011, as part of the State Clean Energy Resource Project, ACEEE completed the report Missouri's Energy Efficiency Potential: Opportunities for Economic Growth and Energy Sustainability. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Missouri h...
AI summary Missouri's energy efficiency goals are voluntary and include incremental and cumulative annual savings targets. The state uses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Utility Cost Test (UCT) as primary and secondary cost-effectiveness tests for evaluating energy efficiency programs.
ed in the California Standard Practice Manual. These are the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and utility cost test (UCT). The benefit-cost tests are required for portfolio and total program level screening. According to the Database of State Eff...
AI summary The text discusses Missouri's use of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) as its primary benefit-cost test for energy efficiency programs, including non-energy benefits. It also mentions the approval of technical reference manuals for Ameren Missouri and KCP&L, and the development of a statewide TRM for gas and electric measures, which has not yet been approved by the Missouri Public Service Commission. Natural gas utilities use all five cost effectiveness tests as governed by specific regulations.
rogram, which calls for all eligible participants to be provided with the past 12 months of energy usage and technical assistance to enable benchmarking buildings using ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager. Building on Ameren Missouri's support...
AI summary The text discusses initiatives related to building energy benchmarking, including the provision of past energy usage data and technical assistance to enable benchmarking using ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager. It also outlines a two-stage project by Ameren Missouri and mentions regulatory requirements for multi-tenant buildings by KCP&L.
local marginalized groups. The state does not currently include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","In April 200...
AI summary The state has implemented energy efficiency standards for state-owned buildings, requiring them to exceed the Energy Conservation Code by 20% where cost-effective. The State Building Energy Conservation Program tracks energy performance and provides benchmarking data publicly. However, there is no specific policy for clean energy workforce development or a disclosure policy in place.
Last Reviewed: June 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: The most current study was finalized in April 2019. The study used the prescriptive method when evaluating compliance and estimated a 75% compliance rate. The report is a...
AI summary The most current compliance study was finalized in April 2019, estimating a 75% compliance rate using the prescriptive method. Utility providers in Montana support energy code compliance through various activities, and the Montana Energy Code Collaborative, coordinated by NEEA and NCAT, includes multiple stakeholders. Training and outreach efforts are conducted by MEO and the Montana Department of Labor and Industry.
y the utilities. There are no specific legal requirements for these evaluations in Montana, and the rules for benefit-cost tests are not specified. Evaluations are conducted for each of the utilities. According to the Database of State Eff...
AI summary Montana uses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) model as its primary cost-effectiveness test for energy efficiency programs, with additional tests like the Utility Cost Test (UCT) and Societal Cost Test (SCT). A 10% environmental adder is applied to the SCT to account for non-energy benefits. Evaluations are conducted for each utility, though there are no specific legal requirements for these assessments.
nsure access for underserved customers or if they include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: September 2020 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2018 ","All new constr...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency and building code compliance in Nebraska, including requirements for new construction and remodeling projects, benchmarking of state facilities, and fleet efficiency standards. It notes the absence of a disclosure policy and the use of the 2018 IECC for compliance.
nder the direction of the Institute for Market Transformation (IMT), to measure the impact of energy codes on commercial buildings and identify opportunities for savings through increased compliance.
AI summary The Institute for Market Transformation (IMT) is directed to measure the impact of energy codes on commercial buildings and identify opportunities for savings through increased compliance.
Utility Involvement: The state’s three largest publicly-owned electric utilities – Lincoln Electric System, Nebraska Public Power District and Omaha Public Power District – have a long history of providing very strong support (financial an...
AI summary The state's three largest publicly-owned electric utilities have historically supported building energy code upgrades and compliance activities. The Nebraska Energy Code Compliance Collaborative (NECCC) was established in 2013 to promote compliance with energy codes. The State Energy Office is required by statute to provide training for code officials and others involved in implementing energy codes. Training initiatives, including conferences and webinars, have been conducted with support from the utilities and the Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance.
ic, mandatory requirement for increasing state fleet efficiency. State alternative-fuel vehicle procurement requirements that give a voluntary option to count efficient vehicles are thus not included. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","Nevada's E...
AI summary Nevada's ESPC programs were established in 2003 and require state and local agencies to follow specific guidelines for success. The Nevada Governor's Office of Energy provides education, tools, and grants to support performance contracting, including funding for energy audits for government entities.
source within its EERS and renewable energy standard, but otherwise has limited policies to encourage CHP. No new CHP systems were installed in 2018. ","Policy: New Hampshire Interconnections Standard Description: The New Hampshire Public...
AI summary The document discusses policies related to combined heat and power (CHP) in New Hampshire, including its eligibility under energy efficiency programs and access to financing through the Clean Energy Fund. CHP systems are designated as eligible measures under various programs, and interconnection rules for net-metered systems up to 1 MW are outlined.
ach electric utility (except for NHEC) proposed an additional system benefit charge component to recover lost base revenues. Natural gas programs are funded by a Local Distribution Adjustment Clause. Additional funding for New Hampshire’s...
AI summary New Hampshire's energy efficiency programs are funded through mechanisms like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and the Local Distribution Adjustment Clause. The state's Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) mandates increased savings targets, with corresponding increases in funding from ISO-NE's forward capacity market (FCM). Savings targets are projected to increase from 0.8% in 2018 to 1.3% in 2020 for electricity and from 0.7% to 0.8% for natural gas.
impact evaluations on a number of specific programs; and adding a representative from the Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Energy (EESE) board to the EM&V working group established in DE 15-137.? According to the Database of State Efficie...
AI summary The text discusses the use of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) as a primary test for decision-making in energy efficiency programs in New Hampshire, including non-energy costs and benefits. It also references the Database of State Efficiency Screening Practices (DSESP) and other resources for further information on cost-effectiveness screening practices and health and environmental benefits.
tomer authorization, suppliers can access Eversource's large customers' interval via a software package called Energy Profiler Online (EPO). Other utilities provide usage data via alternative formats. Requirements for Provision of Energy D...
AI summary The document outlines how energy usage data is provided to customers in New Hampshire, including access via Energy Profiler Online for large customers and requirements for data provision to multi-tenant building owners and public agencies. It also notes that while transportation and land-use planning are integrated, no other policies encourage efficient transportation systems. A bill related to vehicle emissions standards was passed by the House but not acted on due to the pandemic.
ents. The NHDOT Statewide Freight Plan was approved by FHWA on February 11, 2019. Additional information is available on the NHDOT project website. Last Reviewed: July 2021 ","Public transit access New Hampshire does not have any state pro...
AI summary New Hampshire does not have state programs to incentivize low-income housing near transit facilities. It uses federal funds for electric vehicle infrastructure, prioritizing areas with air quality issues. The state also funds transportation programs for seniors and individuals with disabilities, with federal funding covering up to 80% of costs.
iteria among state programs, Additionally, the utility targets and incentive/penalty structure considers performance in the category of low-moderate income programs as part of its evaluation criteria. The Board of Public Utilities is estab...
AI summary The Board of Public Utilities is forming a Workforce Development Working Group to enhance energy efficiency programs with a focus on workforce development and job training for underrepresented and disadvantaged groups. The Clean Energy Act of 2018 mandates commercial building benchmarking using the USEPA Portfolio Manager tool.
pation and energy savings among potential participants that tend to have large, complex facilities. Since 2008, the Clean Energy Division has done nearly 1500 audits and benchmarks across all sectors. New Jersey leads by example with an in...
AI summary New Jersey's Clean Energy Division has conducted over 1500 energy audits since 2008. The state is leading by example with the Energy Savings Improvement Programs (ESIP) aimed at improving energy efficiency in state facilities and contributing to a 20% reduction in energy usage by 2020. The FY20 budget includes increased funding for these initiatives, managed through the BPU and the Energy Capital Committee.
isting of members from Treasury and the BPU Division of State Energy Services coordinates and recommends approval of these projects based on evaluation of capital costs and anticipated energy savings. The list of planned projects includes...
AI summary The State Facilities Initiative involves planned energy efficiency projects coordinated by Treasury and the BPU Division of State Energy Services, with budgets increasing from $100,000 in FY18 to $10 million in FY20, including carryover funds and a true-up from FY19. Agencies are encouraged to use the New Jersey Clean Energy Program’s Local Government Energy Audit program, which covers audit costs fully.
tionally, state agencies are encouraged to utilize the New Jersey Clean Energy Program’s Local Government Energy Audit program which provides 100% of the costs of audits to local and state facilities. The New Jersey Board of Public Utiliti...
AI summary New Jersey state agencies are encouraged to use the NJ Clean Energy Program's Local Government Energy Audit program, which provides free energy audits and benchmarking for public facilities. The Office of State Energy Facilities, established by the NJ Board of Public Utilities, promotes energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives, supported by a $100 million line of credit for state projects.
and usage and identify outlying state facilities that need energy efficiency upgrades. The Division of State Energy Services has started to develop a plan forward to tackle these largest energy users. The New Jersey Department of Community...
AI summary The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs and Rutgers Center for Green Buildings have developed resources to promote energy efficiency in buildings and municipalities. State fleets and certain businesses are regulated under the 1992 Energy Policy Act to increase energy efficiency and use alternative fuels.
ions for fleet procurement. They are also in contact with Sawatch, Electrification Coalition, and Nissan regarding potential outreach projects to promote municipal fleet adoption of electric vehicles. In January 2020, Governor Phil Murphy...
AI summary New Jersey has implemented legislation requiring state-owned non-emergency light duty vehicles to transition to plug-in electric by 2035, with intermediate targets. The Board of Public Utilities and Department of Environmental Protection are working on additional goals for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) in New Jersey are governed by a 2009 law and supported by the New Jersey Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP).
ergy savings performance contracts through the New Jersey Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP). The program complements the New Jersey Clean Energy Program and provides some model ESIP documents. The ESIP allows public facilities to e...
AI summary The New Jersey Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP) enables public facilities to enter into long-term energy savings agreements without using capital budgets. Sixteen Treasury-approved Energy Services Contractors manage these projects, with 127 approved ESIP projects as of August 2020. The Rutgers Center for Green Building evaluates NJCEP energy efficiency programs and promotes green building through research and education.
nt interdisciplinary center for green building excellence in the Northeast, while serving as a single accessible locus for fostering collaboration among green building practitioners and policy-makers. The proposed FY2020 budget also includ...
AI summary The FY2020 budget includes funding for energy efficiency and clean energy initiatives, such as a Research and Development Energy Tech hub, innovation in clean energy, and incentives for smart technology devices. The BPU will also initiate a proceeding on energy storage to address peak demand. The document outlines building code compliance requirements for residential and commercial structures in New Jersey.
Last reviewed: August 2021 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: NJ has an Evaluation Plan which was last made public in May 2017. The BPU’s Office of Clean Energy, in conjunction with the independent evaluator, Rutgers Center for Gr...
AI summary New Jersey has an ongoing Evaluation Plan updated by the BPU and Rutgers Center for Green Building, with a baseline study completed in 2019. A Code Compliance Study is underway, and the Clean Energy Act mandates the development of quantitative performance indicators by utilities. Utilities can participate in advisory groups and committees related to energy codes.
opted a budget of $29 million in FY 2018 for CHP incentives. Last Updated: August 2019 ","Incentives, grants, or financing: New Jersey provides incentives for CHP deployment through several programs. New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program (NJCE...
AI summary New Jersey supports combined heat and power (CHP) deployment through various programs and policies, including financial incentives, tax exemptions, and changes to property definitions. The Clean Energy Program (NJCEP) offers incentives based on system type and efficiency, with bonus incentives for systems with blackstart capabilities. The Cogeneration Tax Exemption provides tax relief for natural gas used in on-site generation, and the state has updated definitions to support CHP integration with district energy systems.
etal Benefit Charge (SBC) for the programs and then transfer these funds to the state. However, state’s societal benefit charge has repeatedly been reallocated away from energy efficiency programming. The most recent budgets for energy eff...
AI summary New Jersey's energy efficiency programs are funded by the Societal Benefit Charge (SBC), but these funds have been reallocated away from energy efficiency. The state requires comprehensive resource assessments (CRAs) every four years, and in 2018, an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) was adopted requiring utilities to achieve specific energy savings targets.
energy conservation measures, including but not limited to building shell, air-sealing, hot water conservation measures, attic, sidewall, and foundation insulation and electric base load measures. In order to expand access for low-income r...
AI summary The document discusses energy conservation measures and the collaboration between NJBPU and NJDCA to expand access to energy efficiency programs for low-income residents. It highlights the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) approved in 2018, as well as the Board's June 2020 EE order requiring utilities to provide non-competing low and moderate income energy efficiency programs and the development of an integrated energy efficiency and health and comfort program.
whole house"" program and provide funding in the 5th quarter FY20 budget extension to design and establish this program. Last reviewed: September 2020 ","There are no opt-out programs in New Jersey. A Societal Benefits Credit (SBC) program...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in New Jersey, including a proposed 'whole house' program and funding for its establishment. It also describes the Societal Benefits Credit (SBC) program and the Large Energy Users Program, which provide incentives for energy efficiency and combined heat and power projects. Performance incentives and penalties are tied to utility-specific energy savings targets.
the target will represent compliance. A penalty will be assessed if performance of the target is between 50% and 90%, and a utility will be deemed non-compliant if achieving 50% or less of its target. The New Jersey Board of Public Utiliti...
AI summary The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) has established compliance targets for energy efficiency programs, with penalties for underperformance. Utilities are required to recover costs through surcharges, and no caps on customer rates are in place. Third-party access to energy use data is available via EDI upon request, with no formal requirements for data provision.
00 per person for the purchase and installation of home charging equipment. Last Reviewed: June 2020 ",0 out of 3,"Policy: N.J. Stat. § 48:3-99 et seq., New Jersey Energy Efficiency Product Standards Description: In 2005 New Jersey Governo...
AI summary New Jersey established Energy Efficiency Product Standards in 2005, which were preempted by the federal Energy Policy Act. The standards are managed by the Board of Public Utilities. New Mexico offers financial incentives for energy efficiency and enables PACE financing, though no active PACE programs exist.
te universities, community colleges, and technical schools. In addition, the statewide modeling effort will include job impact. Last Updated: September 2020 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","New Mexico...
AI summary New Mexico has implemented energy efficiency standards for public buildings since 2006, including LEED-Silver requirements for large buildings and energy performance targets. The state also aims to reduce energy usage by 20% below 2005 levels by 2015 and has initiatives like the WISE program to achieve energy savings goals.
award has a goal to realize 20% energy savings by the year 2020 in the General Services Department building inventory through the WISE (Whole-building Investments for Sustainable Efficiency) program. SB 200 of 2010 established a wider buil...
AI summary New Mexico aims to achieve 20% energy savings in state buildings by 2020 through the WISE program. SB 200 of 2010 mandates Energy Star certification for new and renovated buildings over 3,000 square feet. The Energy Conservation and Management Division (ECMD) supports energy audits and tracks energy use with Portfolio Manager. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham issued Executive Order 2019-03 to develop a climate strategy and adopt new building codes.
ding of natural gas vehicle infrastructure and adoption of natural gas vehicles. The state will also be developing an outline for a pilot project that highlights how CNG can be utilized in New Mexico. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The Energy...
AI summary The document discusses New Mexico's efforts in developing natural gas vehicle infrastructure and adoption, as well as the Energy, Conservation, and Management Division's (ECMD) role in Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC), including the implementation of $280.4 million in contracts that have saved 127.47 million kWh and $12.6 million in guaranteed utility savings.
in the facilities. In addition, measurement and verification reports are required to be reported to the NM Energy Conservation and Management Division every January to confirm the guaranteed savings. ECMD has processed $49.5 million in ene...
AI summary New Mexico has implemented energy performance contracting through agreements with seven ESCOs, supporting $49.5 million in projects across 200 buildings. These efforts are part of a partnership with the DOE and align with House Memorial 61, which calls for a study on energy performance contracting and related initiatives. A task force was formed to evaluate ways to expand and improve these programs.
ng to adopt a strech code beyond the 2018 IECC. Builders can also use the updated NM Energy Conservation Code Residential Applications Manual to comply when building a passive solar or high mass home. Last reviewed: August 2020 "," Gap Ana...
AI summary New Mexico has implemented energy efficiency and compliance measures, including a gap analysis and strategic compliance plan. The state supports training and outreach for building codes and has an interconnection standard for CHP systems. Policy regulations by the Public Regulation Commission govern CHP projects.
energy projects may also be eligible for an Advanced Energy Tax Credit. The state energy office also partners with USDOE support services to address any needs from any entity that requests assistance. New Mexico has used the DOE CHP Techni...
AI summary New Mexico has three investor-owned electric utilities and three natural gas utilities, which are required by the 2005 Efficient Use of Energy Act to invest in energy efficiency and load management. They recover program costs through a tariff rider with annual reconciliation. The state energy office collaborates with USDOE and other organizations to support energy projects and workshops on combined heat and power and waste reduction in the oil and gas industry.
tariff rider with an annual reconciliation mechanism. These four utilities offer a variety of energy efficiency programs, including programs targeted at low-income customers and multi-family housing. Electric IOUs have a statutory goal of...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency (EE) programs and statutory goals for utilities in New Mexico. Electric IOUs have a statutory goal of achieving 8% energy savings by 2020, updated to 5% savings relative to 2020 sales between 2021-2025. Rural electric cooperatives are required to examine cost-effective programs, though they are not mandated to implement them. The Efficient Use of Energy Act (EUEA) of 2005 set these goals and requires utilities to evaluate and implement cost-effective EE and load management programs.
% of 2005 total retail kWh sales by 2014 and 8% of 2005 total retail kWh sales by 2020. This was later updated in 2019 by HB 291 to call for 5% savings relative to 2020 retail sales between 2021-2025. Program costs are 3% of customer bills...
AI summary The Efficient Use of Energy Act (EUEA) mandates that public utilities develop cost-effective energy efficiency and load management resources. The New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC) updated its rules in 2014 to implement these requirements, with utilities required to file annual applications and reports. Program costs are limited to 3% of customer bills for electric utilities and 3% of total annual revenues for gas utilities.
exico’s utilities, and representatives of the Public Regulation Commission, and preserved the targets but reduced the energy savings requirement in 2020 for electric utilities from 10% to 8% of sales. In early 2019, the New Mexico legislat...
AI summary New Mexico passed HB 291 in 2019, which sets energy efficiency program requirements for utilities, reduces the energy savings target for electric utilities from 10% to 8% in 2020, and mandates the development of energy savings targets for 2026–2030. Distribution cooperatives must self-impose electricity reduction targets and report annually to the PRC. Energy efficiency programs are subject to cost-effectiveness testing and independent evaluation for measurement and verification.
year the two programs with the highest projected energy savings are evaluated. The Commission has oversight in selecting the independent program evaluator and uses an RFP process for this purpose. According to the Database of State Efficie...
AI summary The text discusses New Mexico's energy efficiency programs, focusing on the evaluation of programs with the highest projected energy savings, the use of the Utility Cost Test (UCT) for decision-making, and legislative requirements for low-income energy efficiency programs, including targets and funding mandates.
through on-the-job training, and supporting an internship program, the initiative will ensure that New York has the skilled workers necessary to meet clean energy and energy efficiency business needs. The talent pipeline initiative is desi...
AI summary The initiative focuses on developing a talent pipeline for clean energy and energy efficiency in New York, with $38 million allocated for training programs, including support for NY Clean Heat and building electrification. The Truth in Heating law mandates the release of utility data for residential buildings at sale or rental, and state-owned facilities over 25,000 ft2 must benchmark and disclose their energy performance annually.
y 2025. Furthermore, Sections 7.2 and 7.3 of the CLCPA direct State agencies and authorities to incorporate emissions reduction goals into decisions on permits, licenses, grants, loans, and contracts. Following the issuance of the EO166 gu...
AI summary The text outlines New York's climate and energy policies under the CLCPA, emphasizing emissions reduction goals and energy efficiency measures. Key requirements include the development of Energy Master Plans, LED lighting replacement by 2025, and benchmarking policies. These initiatives aim to reduce energy use across state agencies and authorities.
a Clean Energy Community designation. One of the primary policy goals the program advocates for is the implementation of Benchmarking laws, requiring public disclosure of building energy consumption. New Efficiency: New York directs state...
AI summary New York is promoting clean energy through initiatives like the Clean Energy Community designation and Benchmarking laws requiring public disclosure of building energy use. New construction must meet Net Zero Energy or Net Zero Carbon standards starting in 2020, with full compliance by 2030. The state is also working to expand electric vehicle ownership and transition transit fleets to all-electric buses by 2040.
path in their Green Building Code. NYSERDA also worked with the State University of New York Construction Fund to pass a directive that all construction on its campuses will meet NYStretch provisions.
AI summary NYSERDA collaborated with the State University of New York Construction Fund to ensure that all campus construction meets the NYStretch provisions in their Green Building Code.
Last Updated: June 2021 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: NYS performed a Gap Analysis and strategic compliance plan, or Action Plan. The draft report was prepared April 2016, describing both Gap Analysis findings as well as an A...
AI summary New York State conducted a Gap Analysis and strategic compliance plan in 2016 to improve energy code compliance and enforcement. This included interviews with 150 professionals and surveys of 450 code enforcement officials. Baseline compliance studies were conducted in 2015/2016 and 2019/2020, with Delphi Panels and longitudinal studies to measure compliance levels. NYSERDA is involved in these efforts.
for these studies will be published in 2020. Additional Delphi Panels are planned for 2021 and 2023, and annual longitudinal studies through 2023, to measure progress. Utility Involvement: NYSERDA administers utility rate payer dollars to...
AI summary NYSERDA administers utility ratepayer funds to support building energy code compliance and enforcement in New York State. Training, outreach, and stakeholder engagement initiatives are ongoing, including the publication of manuals and the collection of public input through comment periods and working groups.
d-connected CHP systems at customer sites that pay the Systems Benefit Charge (SBC) on their electric bill, or if new construction, will pay the SBC surcharge on the electric bill once interconnected. The CHP Program is available to system...
AI summary The CHP Program provides incentives and consumer protections for combined heat and power systems up to 3 MW. Con Edison partnered with NYSERDA in 2016 to offer additional incentives for CHP projects in Brooklyn and Queens, aiming to fast-track deployment in a transmission-constrained area. The Public Service Commission later authorized non-wires solutions programs, including CHP, for investor-owned utilities.
a 2025 target to achieve 185 Tbtu savings (see New Efficiency, New York report), with 2025 utility targets ramping up to 3% of incremental electric sales and 1.3% for natural gas (January 2020 Order). In 2008, the New York State Public Ser...
AI summary The text discusses the establishment and evolution of energy efficiency programs in New York, including the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS) and the Reforming the Energy Vision proceeding. It outlines the targets, funding, and regulatory processes involved in these initiatives.
al site energy savings for 2015-2025, relative to forecasted site energy consumption in 2025. The white paper also provided a number of strategies the state could pursue in order to achieve the goal. In December 2018, the PSC approved new...
AI summary The PSC approved increased energy efficiency targets for investor-owned utilities in 2018, including a 3% annual reduction in electricity sales by 2025 and a minimum 5 TBtu subtarget for heat pump savings. In 2020, the PSC authorized incremental utility-specific budgets and savings targets for electric, gas, and heat pump portfolios, aiming for 3.0% EE savings as a percentage of sales for electric and 1.3% for gas by 2025.
ity territories to enhance achievement of its targets as well. The amount for which each utility is eligible is based on its proportional share of the utilities’ aggregate targets by the end of 2015. In 2014, New York initiated a proceedin...
AI summary New York's energy efficiency initiatives, including the 2014 REV proceeding (Case 14-M-0101), led to Energy Efficiency Transition Implementation Plans (ETIPs) and energy efficiency earning adjustment mechanisms (EAMs) developed during rate case proceedings. Third-party access to energy use data is not mandated, though Con Edison provides aggregated data to property owners and NYSERDA for program evaluation.
o NYSERDA for program evaluation. Energy Use Data Availability New York does not have an online standardized system through which access to individual or aggregated energy use data may be requested. Last Updated: July 2018 ",10.5 out of 12...
AI summary New York has efficient transportation policies, including the adoption of California's Low-Emission Vehicle Program and ZEV program. The state encourages comprehensive planning for local development and has implemented the Smart Growth Public Infrastructure Policy Act to reduce sprawl costs and ensure infrastructure projects align with smart growth criteria.
ergy workforce. Various state agencies, college/universities and non-profits are taking actions identified in these recommendations. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","Senate Bill...
AI summary North Carolina has implemented energy efficiency requirements for state-owned buildings, including exceeding ASHRAE 90.1-2004 standards and reducing energy consumption by specific percentages. The Utility Savings Initiative (USI) manages energy efficiency efforts, though funding was scaled back in 2017. The state also participates in the Better Buildings Challenge with a goal of reducing energy consumption by 20% by 2020.
he entire existing building stock, which included all agency and UNC buildings, was committed to the challenge, which sets a goal of reducing energy consumption by 20% by 2020 from a 2008-09 baseline. In October 2018, Governor Cooper signe...
AI summary North Carolina has committed to energy reduction goals, including a 20% reduction in energy consumption by 2020 and a 40% reduction in BTUs/Sqft by 2025. Governor Cooper's Executive Order 80 includes targets for energy efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions, and electric vehicle purchases. The state also has a Petroleum Displacement Plan requiring a reduction in petroleum use and alternative fuel vehicle acquisition requirements.
on in performance contracts with state agencies and universities. In the past 3 years, local governmental units have enacted ESPCs totaling $47,888,969 with an annual guaranteed savings of $3,998,615. Last Updated: July 2020 ","The North C...
AI summary The North Carolina Solar Center and CERT at North Carolina A&T State University focus on energy efficiency and renewable energy research. They have implemented ESPCs with significant savings and operate programs like DSIRE. Appalachian State University’s Energy Center also contributes to renewable energy policy and development.
Engineering Division of the NC Department of Insurance regularly conducts code trainings and they have energy conservation code training modules available on their website. Last Reviewed: July 2021 ",,"The state offers incentives for CHP p...
AI summary North Carolina has interconnection standards for CHP projects, classifies CHP as an energy efficiency measure, and offers incentives for CHP installations. A court decision in 2017 changed how CHP is classified, and Duke Energy provides incentives for CHP as part of their energy efficiency programs.
system is an energy efficiency measure. As of June 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas both offer incentives for CHP as a part of their non-residential energy efficiency programs. Last Updated: September 2018 ","Incentives...
AI summary The text discusses incentives and policies supporting combined heat and power (CHP) in North Carolina, including tax credits and the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS). It notes that Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas offer incentives for CHP as part of their energy efficiency programs.
tate’s RPS, which is a part of the Energy Portfolio Standard (EPS) encourages the use of opportunity fuels that may be used to power CHP, which can meet up to 25% of the RPS requirements through 2018. Last Updated: July 2018 ",3 out of 20,...
AI summary North Carolina's Energy Portfolio Standard (EPS) includes a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) that encourages the use of opportunity fuels for Combined Heat and Power (CHP), which can contribute up to 25% of RPS requirements through 2018. Energy efficiency programs have expanded, but investment and performance remain below the national average. The NCUC implemented REPS in 2008, setting energy efficiency targets that increased from 0.75% to 5% of prior-year sales by 2021.
. For further reading, in March 2010, as part of the State Clean Energy Resource Project, ACEEE completed the report North Carolina's Energy Future: Electricity, Water, and Transportation Efficiency. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Individual...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency and renewable energy programs in North Carolina, including the NCUC's oversight, the 2011 settlement agreement between Progress Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Carolinas, and the establishment of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REEPS) in 2007. It outlines cost-recovery mechanisms and energy efficiency goals for utilities.
the full quarter allowable over the next ten years. Industrial customers may opt-out of utility energy efficiency programs and not bear the costs of new programs if they implement their own programs. Each electric power supplier must file...
AI summary North Carolina requires electric power suppliers to file REPS compliance plans as part of their Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) filings, including a 15-year forecast of demand-side resources. Industrial customers may opt-out of utility energy efficiency programs. Cost-effectiveness tests include total resource cost, utility cost, participant cost, and ratepayer impact measure tests. Evaluations of energy efficiency programs are conducted by utilities under regulatory orders.
nsure access for underserved customers or if they include specific measures to prioritize clean energy workforce development. Last Updated: September 2020 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2017 ","Though North D...
AI summary The text discusses the absence of a disclosure policy in North Dakota, the existence of public building efficiency programs, and the lack of specific policies for state fleet efficiency. It also notes the legal framework enabling energy savings contracts and the absence of public research centers focused on energy efficiency.
eholder Advisory Group: NA Training/Outreach: A series of seven trainings on the 2009 IECC were held across the state in January of 2015 for contractors, code officials, and aspiring code officials. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ",,"Some i...
AI summary The text discusses the lack of state policies and incentives for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) deployment in North Dakota, noting no new CHP systems were installed in 2018. While some tax exemptions and net metering rules apply to CHP, there are no comprehensive policies to support CHP deployment or acquisition of energy savings.
including energy conservation requirements. Last reviewed: August 2020 ","Ohio's commercial energy code is mandatory statewide and references both the 2012 IECC and 2010 ASHRAE 90.1 with amendments. Amendments were made to both the commerc...
AI summary Ohio's energy codes are mandatory statewide and reference the 2012 IECC and 2010 ASHRAE 90.1 with amendments. Local jurisdictions cannot adopt conflicting codes. A gap analysis and compliance studies have been conducted, and utilities provide voluntary support for training. Ohio also has an interconnection standard and incentive program for CHP systems.
that provides up to $500,000 for CHP projects with generating capacities less than 500 kW (not to exceed 50% of the project cost) The rebates include $0.08 per kWh generated and $100 per kW capacity. Last Updated: September 2018 ","Incenti...
AI summary Ohio provides financial incentives for CHP projects, including rebates and tax exemptions, but energy efficiency programs have faced legislative challenges, including the elimination of most programs by HB 6 in 2019. Technical assistance is available in certain areas.
nt their savings collectively. Given the bill prohibits PUCO from approving a cost recovery mechanism after the 17.5% target is reached, programs are scheduled to be discontinued at the close of 2020. Before it's dismantling under HB 6, Oh...
AI summary The text discusses Ohio’s Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS) under Senate Bill 221, which included an Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS) and required utilities to achieve cumulative energy savings targets. The law was scheduled to be discontinued at the end of 2020 due to a prohibition on cost recovery mechanisms after reaching the 17.5% target. The primary and secondary cost-effectiveness tests used were the total resource cost test and the utility cost test.
, and the EPP. In doing so, the HWAP network integrates federal weatherization funds with utility resources through a single coordinated funding model, managing programs for all seven major utilities. Last updated: April 2017 ","Self-direc...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms in Ohio, including the integration of federal weatherization funds with utility resources through the HWAP network, self-direct options for large customers under SB 221, and the termination of cost recovery for EERS compliance once a savings benchmark is met under HB 6.
ely reaching the 17.5% cumulative savings benchmark, a goal anticipated to be surpassed in 2020. Per HB 6, a February 2020 PUCO order calls for the winding down of programs starting in September 2020. In the Public Utilities Commission of...
AI summary Ohio has not implemented policies requiring utilities to release energy use data, lacks transportation and land use integration policies, and has no state programs to incentivize low-income housing near transit. Energy efficiency programs are being phased out under HB 6, and opt-out provisions for energy efficiency have been expanded.
k or evaluate how any energy, sustainability, or climate action initiatives being taken are affecting local marginalized groups. Last Updated: July 2021 ","There is no disclosure policy in place. Last Updated: July 2018 ","In 2008, the Gov...
AI summary The text discusses Oklahoma's energy efficiency policies, including the Conserving Oklahoma Act, the Oklahoma First Energy Plan, and the State Facilities Energy Conservation Program. These initiatives require state-owned buildings to meet LEED standards, set energy savings targets, and use the ENERGYSTAR Portfolio Manager tool for benchmarking. However, no disclosure policy or fleet efficiency requirements are in place.
hase their NEG. If the utility agrees, the NEG will be purchased at the utility's avoided-cost rate. Last Updated: July 2018 ","There are currently no additional supportive policies to encourage CHP. Last Updated: July 2018 ",4 out of 20,"...
AI summary Oklahoma utilities have energy efficiency programs, but their investment and performance are below the national average. The Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) established and updated rules for these programs in 2008 and 2018, requiring utilities to file three-year program plans. Utilities may recover lost revenues and earn incentives for successful programs, but no policy currently treats energy efficiency as a resource.
t revenues and earn an incentive for implementing successful energy efficiency programs. Last reviewed: July 2020 ","There is currently no policy in place that treats energy efficiency as a resource. Last reviewed: July 2020 ","There is cu...
AI summary The evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Oklahoma uses multiple cost-effectiveness tests, including the total resource cost test, utility cost test, participant cost test, societal cost test, and ratepayer impact measure. These tests are mandated by regulatory orders and Commission rules, and apply to all levels of program evaluation.
n communities expressed interest in local ordinances for home and commercial scoring as part of their Climate Action Plans. These communities are moving through the process to create scoring programs. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","The mandat...
AI summary Communities are developing local ordinances for home and commercial energy scoring as part of their Climate Action Plans. Oregon's State Energy Efficiency Design Program (SEED) requires state facilities built after 2001 to exceed energy conservation standards by 20%, with 21 agencies using Energy Star Portfolio Manager for reporting. The Oregon Department of Energy (ODOE) uses this data for benchmarking and identifying energy efficiency opportunities.
chmarking policies and ordinances. Based on ODOE's ongoing data gathering and Portfolio Manager reporting of state buildings, the state has benchmarked 312 buildings, or over 17.5 million square feet. ODOE pulls reports from the Portfolio...
AI summary The Oregon Department of Energy (ODOE) is responsible for benchmarking state buildings using Portfolio Manager reporting, which has covered over 17.5 million square feet. ODOE prepares a biennial State Energy Efficient Design report for the legislature. Oregon law mandates that public buildings include energy efficiency measures and invest 1.5% of project costs in green energy technologies. University system policy requires new construction to meet LEED Silver standards.
nonrenewable energy resources and to serve as models of energy efficiency. University system policy requires that new construction in the higher education system meet at minimum LEED silver standards. A 2017 Executive Order implemented new...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency and carbon neutrality initiatives in Oregon, including requirements for new state buildings to meet LEED silver standards, carbon-neutral operations for new buildings, retrofits for existing buildings based on ASHRAE standards, and the development of procurement guidelines and lifecycle analysis tools to promote energy efficiency.
he Baker Lighting Lab at University of Oregon provides support and opportunities for the exploration of light design ideas. Among other facets, it studies daylighting and the control of these systems. Portland State University’s Green Buil...
AI summary The text highlights various institutions in Oregon that focus on energy, transportation, and environmental research. These include the Baker Lighting Lab, Green Building Research Laboratory, Energy Trust of Oregon, and the Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC), among others, which contribute to advancements in sustainable design, air quality, energy efficiency, and transportation innovation.
Last reviewed: July 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: Commercial: On October 16, 2019 Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) completed the Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies (Report #E19-392) for 2019 Oregon New Comme...
AI summary The document discusses compliance studies for Oregon's commercial and residential energy codes, highlighting high compliance rates and minimal deviations from code requirements. It also outlines utility involvement in promoting energy efficiency through training, incentives, and market transformation efforts.
Trust of Oregon). Through NEEA, utilities directly support market transformation, training, and compliance with energy codes. Utility program implementers participate in code proposal development. Oregon's compliance rates are such that di...
AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon (NEEA) supports market transformation, training, and compliance with energy codes. NEEA, funded by utilities, collaborates with state agencies and stakeholders to ensure code compliance and advance energy efficiency standards. Oregon's PUC allows energy savings from code compliance to be included in utility IRP energy efficiency savings. Multiple stakeholder groups, including the CIEB and BWEEG, contribute to code development and compliance.
g efforts. ODOE hosted a workshop in 2016 that focused on resiliency and CHP systems entitled ""Northwest Combined Heat and Power: Improving Efficiency and Resilience in Energy Intensive Businesses."" Last Updated: July 2018 ",11 out of 20...
AI summary Oregon has been a leader in energy efficiency since the 1980s, with programs like the 1981 Residential Energy Conservation Act and the 1999 SB 1149 restructuring law. The Energy Trust of Oregon (ETO) administers energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and has set energy savings goals for multiple periods.
energy savings goals for the years 2015 through 2019 of 240 average megawatts (2,102 GWh) and 24 million annual therms of natural gas. These goals include savings from market transformation programs. NW Natural and Cascade Natural Gas adop...
AI summary Oregon has set energy savings goals from 2015 to 2019, including 2,102 GWh of electricity and 24 million therms of natural gas. NW Natural, Cascade Natural Gas, and Avista Utilities use various funding mechanisms for their programs. The Energy Trust of Oregon (ETO) administers most natural gas energy efficiency programs and has been successful since its creation in 2002.
s: Improving Large Customer Self-Direct Programs. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Oregon is p...
AI summary Oregon's energy efficiency programs are managed by the Energy Trust of Oregon, which works with investor-owned utilities to achieve cost-effective energy savings. SB 1157 (2016) mandates that electric utilities pursue all cost-effective energy efficiency. Incremental targets for 2020–2021 are ~1.3% for electricity and ~0.5% for natural gas.
a through Schedule 320 for large commercial and industrial customers. Pacific Power has historically made interval meter data available through Schedule 271. They called this service Energy Profiler. The only third party that regularly rec...
AI summary The document discusses energy data availability and management in Oregon, including how Pacific Power provides interval meter data and Energy Trust of Oregon's access to customer data. It also outlines Oregon's transportation and emissions policies, including adoption of California's Low-Emission Vehicle and Zero-Emission Vehicle programs.
of State Payroll Tax Program that provides a direct ongoing revenue stream for transit districts that can demonstrate equal local matching revenues from state agency employers in their service areas. Last Reviewed: June 2020 ","In the 2017...
AI summary The document discusses Oregon's transportation and energy policies, including the State Payroll Tax Program for transit districts and the Keep Oregon Moving Act, which introduced incentives for zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) through rebate programs. The funding for these programs comes from a tax on car dealers, though a pending lawsuit may affect its eligibility.
more population are residents of color as defined by the US Census. All of these communities are encouraged during the training webinar below to engage their EJ communities in climate action planning. DEP worked with BW Research Partnershi...
AI summary Pennsylvania has implemented Executive Order 2019-01, which mandates energy consumption reductions in public buildings and promotes clean energy workforce development through reports and training initiatives. The DEP collaborated with BW Research Partnership to produce employment and workforce development reports, highlighting clean energy employment trends and identifying training needs.
Last reviewed: July 2020 "," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The Building Codes Assistance Project completed a gap analysis in 2012. The Pennsylvania Energy Code Collaborative (PECC) met to further define best practices and recomme...
AI summary This text outlines efforts in Pennsylvania to improve energy code compliance, including a gap analysis, strategic compliance plan, baseline studies, utility involvement, stakeholder meetings, and training initiatives. The PECC and other groups are working on long-term actions to support energy efficiency goals.
ncing: CHP systems may have access to state grants and loans through the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority (PEDA) and Commonwealth Financing Authority’s Alternative Clean Energy (ACE) Program. Net metering: Net metering rules apply...
AI summary The text discusses net metering and CHP systems in Pennsylvania, including eligibility criteria, rules, and programs such as the Alternative Clean Energy (ACE) Program. It references legislative acts and regulatory actions by the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
nsumption (i.e., system size is not limited by the customer's on-site load). Systems eligible for net metering include those that generate electricity using combined heat and power (CHP) technologies. Last Updated: July 2018 ","Some additi...
AI summary Pennsylvania supports combined heat and power (CHP) systems through policies and initiatives, including a CHP policy statement, collaboration with Penn State University on a microgrid demonstration project, and the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS) which recognizes renewable CHP as a Tier I resource.
Enabled Renewable Energy Guide” are also underway. The state also encourages the use of renewable-fueled CHP systems through its AEPS, which recognizes renewable CHP as eligible as a Tier I resource. Last Updated: July 2018 ",4 out of 20,"...
AI summary Pennsylvania has significantly expanded energy efficiency programs since the enactment of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (Act 129) in 2008, with oversight by the PUC. The program has evolved through multiple phases, setting increasing energy savings and demand response targets over time.
A has 13 rural electric cooperatives and several smaller municipalities that are not regulated by the Commission. The rural electric cooperatives do offer some electric efficiency programs/incentives. In 2016, the Commission approved a rat...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs in Pennsylvania, including the approval of natural gas EE&C programs by the PUC, the implementation of Phase III of Act 129, and the use of the total resource cost test as a primary cost-effectiveness test. It also mentions the absence of natural gas EERS in the state.
onic Data Exchange Working Group and directed electric utilities to establish secure web portals that can be used by entities working for utilities or licensed suppliers to obtain customer meter data. Last reviewed: July 2019 ",6.5 out of...
AI summary Pennsylvania has implemented policies to promote efficient transportation systems, including tailpipe emissions standards and incentives for high-efficiency vehicles. The state adopted California’s Low Emission Vehicle Program in 1998, which significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions. However, federal standards were later rolled back by the SAFE Vehicles Act in 2020. Smart growth initiatives in Pennsylvania include brownfields reuse and farmland preservation programs, though the state planning statute does not mandate specific measures like urban growth boundaries.
e, except for municipal buildings, which aggregate buildings by municipality. Last Updated: July 2016 ","Act No. 57 of 2014 establishes energy savings mandates for each government branch as follows: By 2022, all state agencies, public corp...
AI summary Act No. 57 of 2014 mandates energy savings targets for state agencies, judicial branch buildings, and municipalities, including a 40% reduction in electrical energy consumption by 2022 and the promotion of energy savings performance contracts. The State Office of Energy Policy oversees implementation and publishes program evaluations. No specific policies are in place for state efficient fleet initiatives.
ack the success and efficacy of these efforts and develop additional metrics, with significant community input, to evaluate how local marginalized groups are impacted by energy policy and programming. Rhode Island's State Energy Plan - Ene...
AI summary Rhode Island's Energy 2035 Plan includes policies supporting low-income and underserved customers through programs like WAP and LIHEAP, enhanced incentives for air source heat pumps, and targeted energy efficiency initiatives. The plan also emphasizes equitable heating sector transformation and sets specific funding levels for income-eligible programs in utility energy efficiency plans.
age. The state is in the process of matching properties with energy data and is seeking proposals for a web-based utility bill management application to streamline reporting and tracking capabilities. The state has also established the Rho...
AI summary Rhode Island is developing a web-based utility bill management application to streamline reporting and tracking. Additionally, the state established RIPEP, a three-year energy efficiency initiative, which completed energy audits, implemented efficiency projects, and used rebates and financing to achieve significant energy savings.
sts ESPCs as one of the main ways it promotes energy efficiency and cites funds used to engage energy service companies to use ESPCs. The state provides a model contract and a list of qualified ESCOs. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","The Univer...
AI summary Rhode Island promotes energy efficiency through ESPCs, a voluntary stretch code for buildings, and the Energy Fellows Program. The state has adopted the 2015 IECC with amendments and supports a stretch code aiming for 15% more energy efficiency. Compliance with building codes is mandatory statewide.
ode Commission to provide trainings and support aimed at improving code compliance with the energy code in the RI CCEI. National Grid is also actively involved in strategic planning and coordination with the RI Building Code Commission, OE...
AI summary National Grid collaborates with the RI Building Code Commission, OER, and other stakeholders to improve code compliance with the energy code in the RI CCEI. The Code Compliance Enhancement Initiative (CCEI) includes training, outreach, and partnerships aimed at enhancing compliance and engagement from various industry groups.
Resource Management Council (EERMC). Efforts include classroom trainings, webinars, focus groups and on site demonstrations, as well as the development of an array of compliance documentation tools. Last Updated: September 2020 ",,"The sta...
AI summary Rhode Island has implemented policies to support combined heat and power (CHP) deployment, including incentives and eligibility within its energy efficiency resource standard. The state also established a tariff for distributed generation interconnection, offering streamlined processes for CHP systems. However, no new CHP systems were deployed in 2018.
tional Grid's CHP Program. For any project greater than 1 new MW, a performance-based energy efficiency incentive, capped at $20/kW-year ($1.66/kW-month) for a period of up to ten years, is available. Last Updated: August 2019 ","Incentive...
AI summary Rhode Island supports combined heat and power (CHP) through incentives, streamlined permitting, and nonwires alternatives. Incentives range from $900/kW to $1250/kW, depending on system efficiency and energy efficiency commitments. Air permitting is simplified for CHP systems under Regulation No. 43. CHP is also eligible for nonwires alternatives to enhance grid reliability and resilience.
as also codified the use of nonwires alternatives for promoting the state's policy goals of enhancing grid reliability and resilience. CHP is defined as an eligible measure for nonwires alternatives. Technical assistance is also available,...
AI summary Rhode Island has achieved high energy savings through its energy efficiency programs, supported by legislation like the Comprehensive Energy Conservation, Efficiency and Affordability Act of 2006 and House Bill 8082. Narragansett Electric and Pascoag Utility District manage these programs, with National Grid offering technical assistance and incentives for CHP systems.
and authorizes utility demand-side management program plans, including budget amounts. The fee to support energy efficiency is a floor; actual spending amounts have exceeded this minimum requirement. The most recent budgets for energy effi...
AI summary Rhode Island has a legislative requirement for electric and gas utilities to prioritize energy efficiency as the first resource in their loading order. The Comprehensive Energy Conservation, Efficiency and Affordability Act of 2006 mandates cost-effective energy efficiency procurement, with utilities submitting plans reviewed by the Public Utilities Commission. Energy efficiency budgets and savings are tracked in State Spending and Savings Tables.
urement mandate, National Grid is required to participate in strategic long-term planning and invest in all energy efficiency that is cost-effective and cheaper than supply on behalf of its customers. The act also established requirements...
AI summary Rhode Island's EERS policy mandates strategic long-term planning and energy efficiency procurement by utilities like National Grid. Utilities must submit 3-year and annual plans with spending and savings goals, reviewed annually by the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission. Energy efficiency cost-effectiveness is evaluated using state-specific tests, with deemed savings and technical reference materials provided by utilities.
es, K-12 schools and colleges and universities for over a decade. This data allows individual organizations to compare their energy use with others of a similar type, and adjust behavior accordingly. In June 2008, the state enacted additio...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency initiatives in the state, including legislation requiring energy use reductions, benchmarking data collection, and energy audits. It also mentions requirements for new state buildings to meet green building standards and preferences for purchasing alternative fuel vehicles.
rid, plug-in hybrid electric, biodiesel, hydrogen, fuel cell, or flexible fuel vehicles when the performance, quality, and anticipated lifecycle costs are comparable to other available motor vehicles. Section 1-11-220 (e) requires the Divi...
AI summary South Carolina's energy efficiency policies include vehicle acquisition standards favoring energy-efficient options and building codes referencing the 2009 IECC. The state allows energy performance contracts and provides resources for compliance. No public research centers focus on energy efficiency.
arency and accountability, Public Service Commission empowerment concerning approving utility's integrated resource plans (IRPs), and encouraging competition, especially from “small power producers.” The state Energy Office launched the So...
AI summary The text discusses the absence of an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (EERS) in place as of June 2020 and outlines the South Carolina Energy Efficiency Roadmap initiative launched in 2019. The initiative includes working groups focused on energy efficiency, equity, utility programs, and education, with a final report expected by October 2020. Cost-effectiveness tests used include the utility cost test, ratepayer impact measure test, and total resource cost test.
l utilities perform integrated resource planning (IRP), which considers energy efficiency as a potential resource to meet demands. For more information on energy efficiency as a resource, click here. Last Updated: July 2018 ","There is cur...
AI summary The text discusses how South Dakota evaluates energy efficiency programs using cost-effectiveness tests, including the Total Resource Cost (TRC) as the primary test and several secondary tests. It also notes the absence of an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) and the voluntary participation of utilities in the state's Renewable, Recycled, and Conserved Energy Objective.
7 end-users across General Government and Higher Education have been granted access to the UDM platform. As a result, the SFUM team is now able to provide aggregated utility consumption and cost data. As of May 2019, SFUM now tracks all ut...
AI summary Seven end-users in General Government and Higher Education have access to the UDM platform, allowing SFUM to provide aggregated utility consumption data. Since May 2019, SFUM tracks utility energy use at State-owned facilities, including higher education institutions, and measures energy efficiency project savings. The State of Tennessee benchmarks 100% of its State-owned facilities using various metrics.
"," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The Tennessee (TDEC) Office of Energy Programs, the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, and the Tennessee Fire Service and Codes Enforcement Academy) are currently engaged in a reside...
AI summary The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office of Energy Programs, along with other state agencies, is conducting a residential energy code compliance baseline field study to identify areas needing additional education and training. The study, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and led by the Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance, collects data from single-family homes across two climate zones in Tennessee.
nt seven years beginning September 1, 2019. Each political subdivision must submit a report annually to SECO regarding the entity's progress and efforts to meet the five percent annual reduction goal. In 2007, Governor Perry signed HB 3693...
AI summary The text outlines various legislative and executive actions in Tennessee aimed at promoting energy efficiency. These include HB 3693, which set energy reduction goals for schools and state agencies, and Executive Order RP 49, which was updated by SB 700 to require energy reporting. Energy Star Portfolio Manager is used for tracking progress, and programs like Energy Savings Performance Contracts are encouraged.
tool. Each shall prepare a long-range plan for the delivery of reliable, cost-effective utility services to the agency or institution, and shall update every 5 years and post plan on a public website. As published in April 2016, the State...
AI summary The document outlines requirements for state agencies and institutions to create energy efficiency and vehicle management plans. It specifies energy codes for new construction, the use of EnergyStar Portfolio Manager for tracking energy data, and mandates for reducing gasoline usage and promoting low-emission vehicles. The Office of Vehicle Fleet Management (OVFM) is responsible for managing vehicle reporting systems and ensuring compliance with alternative fuel purchase requirements.
"," Gap Analysis/Strategic Compliance Plan: The South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource (SPEER) collaborated with the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO) to conduct a baseline study. The study did not attemp...
AI summary This section outlines Texas's efforts in energy code compliance through the South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource (SPEER) and the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). It details baseline studies, compliance studies, utility involvement, stakeholder groups, and training programs aimed at improving residential energy efficiency and code compliance.
have all created districts. CHP is eligible and being promoted for PACE financing in these areas. Last Updated: August 2017 ","Several additional supportive policies exist to encourage CHP in Texas. In 2013, Texas passed House Bill 2049, w...
AI summary Texas has implemented several policies to support combined heat and power (CHP) systems, including HB 2049, HB 3268, and requirements for critical government buildings to assess CHP feasibility. Additionally, energy efficiency goals for electric utilities in Texas have been established since 1999, though they remain below national standards.
by December 31, 2009 (Texas House Bill 3693). The legislation also required utilities to submit energy savings goals. The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) approved these rules in March 2008. While the 2007 legislation required uti...
AI summary Texas legislation and regulatory actions, including Senate Bill 1125 and PUCT orders, establish energy savings goals and cost caps for utilities. The PUCT uses the utility cost test as the primary cost-effectiveness test for evaluating ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs.
ed the program into law on June 12th and the rebate goes into effect on Sept. 1, 2017. Last Reviewed: May 2020 ",0 out of 3,"Texas adopted plumbing product standards in 2009 for toilets and urinals. Last Reviewed: June 2019 ", U.S. Virgin...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs and policies in Texas and the U.S. Virgin Islands, including rebate programs, plumbing product standards, and energy service performance contracts. It also references the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE) as a source of information.
75% of DFCM managed buildings are being bench-marked in Building OS. This does not include higher education or other public buildings. The City of Salt Lake has its own bench-marking program underway. In Spring 2015, the Utah Governor's Of...
AI summary 75% of DFCM-managed buildings are being benchmarked in Building OS, excluding higher education and public buildings. Utah has initiated a statewide benchmarking program through legislation S.B. 217 (2015), requiring annual reporting of energy and water consumption by state agencies. An RFP was issued for metering buildings and developing an online benchmarking platform, with the contract active until 2024.
mated highway mileage rating of at least 35 mpg. Pursuant to the Governor's Executive Order, the Maine DOT Central Fleet has purchased six battery electric vehicles for usage across state government. Last Updated: July 2020 ","In 1999, Mai...
AI summary Maine has implemented energy efficiency initiatives, including the adoption of the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code and the use of Energy Saving Performance Contracts (ESPCs). The state also administers energy efficiency programs through Efficiency Maine and has invested in research and development through the Maine Technology Institute.
Last Reviewed: May 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: A New Construction Baseline Assessment was performed by Ridgeline Energy Analytics in 2020-21. The study used Home Energy Rating Scores (HERS) and RemRate software to asses...
AI summary A compliance study conducted by Ridgeline Energy Analytics found that 67% of homes in Maine met energy code standards under the 2009 IECC. The study faced limitations due to the pandemic. Maine has statutory requirements for Efficiency Maine's involvement in energy code development, and offers training and outreach for code enforcement and compliance.
interconnection requests for all eligible technologies and systems subject to Maine PUC jurisdiction. The four tiers are not subject to jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Last Updated: July 2018 ","CHP in Ener...
AI summary Maine's energy efficiency standards include CHP systems eligible under PURPA, with a goal for utilities to procure cost-effective energy efficiency resources. Efficiency Maine Trust is required to achieve specific CHP savings targets, with financial incentives provided for qualifying projects.
grants, such as those received from the Federal government's American Recovery Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in 2010. The funds for natural gas conservation programs are collected through a rate surcharge. The most recent budgets for energy effi...
AI summary Maine's energy efficiency programs are funded through rate surcharges and are required by statute to procure all cost-effective energy efficiency. Efficiency Maine operates under triennial plans, with the most recent covering fiscal years 2017-2019. Annual savings targets for 2020-2022 are approximately 2.3% for electricity and 0.1% for natural gas.
ird Triennial Plan covering fiscal years 2017-2019 was approved in 2016. Last reviewed: September 2020 ","Summary: Annual savings targets of ~2.3% for electric and 0.1% for natural gas for 2020-2022. The Maine Public Utilities Commission (...
AI summary The fourth Triennial Plan of Efficiency Maine, approved by the Maine Public Utilities Commission, sets annual energy efficiency savings targets for 2020-2022, including 2.3% for electricity and 0.1% for natural gas. The plan incorporates long-term statutory targets, such as reducing electricity and natural gas consumption by 20% by 2020 and conducting weatherization of homes.
ility, serving roughly 80% of statewide load, proposed and was granted decoupling in its rate case in 2014 (Docket No. 2013-00168). Last reviewed: September 2020 ","Guidelines for Third Party Access In 2007, Maine's Electronic Business Tra...
AI summary Maine's energy sector has implemented decoupling in its rate case, allowing Efficiency Maine access to individual meter data through a Commission Order. Guidelines for third-party access and electronic data interchange standards have been established to support retail competition and data dissemination.
onversion of VEMP to a self-sustaining enterprise operation and to create a plan to centralize energy management across state facilities to seek out economies of scale and greater energy efficiencies. Governor McAuliffe issued Executive Or...
AI summary The text discusses the conversion of the Virginia Energy Management Program (VEMP) into a self-sustaining enterprise and the centralization of energy management across state facilities to achieve economies of scale and energy efficiency. It also references Executive Order 31 issued by Governor McAuliffe, which promotes energy efficiency measures, including Energy Performance Contracting (EPC), and highlights investments in EPCs and the role of various organizations in advancing clean energy technologies and research.
ication. The program consists of two separate components, training and examination, with training delivered by the Jack A. Proctor Virginia Building Code Academy (JPVBA) and examinations administered by various nationally-recognized code t...
AI summary The document discusses training and examination programs for code officials in Virginia, including the Jack A. Proctor Virginia Building Code Academy and interconnection standards. It also mentions limited state policies for combined heat and power (CHP) development and the 2018 State Energy Plan's recommendations.
resource plan. The authors also recommend developing strategies for achieving the target. These include utility investments, private market mobilization, and the deployment of CHP in public buildings. Last Updated: August 2019 ",1.5 out of...
AI summary Virginia has made significant legislative progress in clean energy and energy efficiency, including the Grid Transformation and Security Act of 2018, which mandates $1.3 billion in energy efficiency spending over ten years. The state also set a legislative goal in 2007 to reduce electricity consumption by 10% by 2022 and established mandatory energy efficiency targets for utilities.
Transformation and Security Act of 2018 (HB 1558/SB 966), which requires regulated utilities to spend $1.3 billion on energy efficiency over the next ten years, more than tripling efficiency budgets. Virginia’s State Corporation Commission...
AI summary Virginia's energy efficiency regulations require Dominion Energy and ApCo to achieve specific energy savings targets by 2025. The 2020 VCEA mandates 5% and 2% savings respectively, translating to average annual savings of 1.2% over four years. The state also requires integrated resource plans from utilities and has authorized cost recovery for energy efficiency programs.
ral gas decoupling mechanism that provides for a sales adjustment to customers’ monthly bills. The ECP and RNA Rider became effective on January 1, 2009 (Docket No. PUE-2008-00060; December 23, 2008). Virginia Code Section 56-585.1 provide...
AI summary Virginia has no policy requiring utilities to release energy use data. The state has not adopted the Advanced Clean Cars program, though it was recommended in the 2018 Virginia Energy Plan. The state does fund transportation initiatives and has passed complete streets legislation.
ergy assistance need, or increase of 15% from 2018, by 2030; and (B) 90% current energy assistance need by 2050. Utilities are mandated to make progress on these goals as part of compliance with CETA. CETA also included equity provisions a...
AI summary Washington State's CETA mandates utilities to meet energy assistance goals and ensure equitable distribution of clean energy benefits. The legislation includes provisions for equity in utility planning, requiring integrated resource plans to consider cumulative impacts on vulnerable communities. Clean energy workforce development is also emphasized as part of the initiative.
. The state plans to track these indicators across the census tracts of applicants to monitor changes to the environmental or health factors the indicators measure. Clean energy workforce development CETA includes incentives for workforce...
AI summary The state plans to track environmental and health indicators across census tracts of applicants. CETA provides tax incentives for workforce development, including exemptions based on labor standards and community agreements. SB 5854 requires nonresidential buildings to maintain energy data records for disclosure to buyers and lenders.
y star rating system. Resulting metrics will be disclosed to a prospective buyer, lessee, or lender. Benchmarking will be required to demonstrate compliance with the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 100-2018. Last Reviewed: July 2019 ","WA Statute...
AI summary Washington State requires public agencies receiving state capital budget funding to meet LEED Silver standards and include building commissioning in the design process. Senate Bill 5854 mandates benchmarking of public facilities using EPA Portfolio Manager. The state has benchmarked a large percentage of its buildings and supports local government benchmarking through the Smart Building Center.
that each lease or purchase of new vehicles shall prioritize battery electric vehicles(BEV) (or better emerging technology), and that all trips which could be feasibly made by BEVs shall be utilized. Last Updated: July 2020 ","Washington h...
AI summary Washington State prioritizes battery electric vehicles (BEVs) in new vehicle leases and purchases, and utilizes energy performance contracting to improve public facility efficiency. The Smart Buildings Center and WSU's Energy Program support building energy technology development and energy efficiency initiatives.
Last reviewed: July 2021 "," Baseline & Updated Compliance Studies: A residential code compliance study was completed by the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) in 2013. This report describes the compliance of residential new const...
AI summary A residential and commercial code compliance study was conducted in Washington State, showing high compliance rates with energy codes. The study used two methods, and utilities provided funding to NEEA for code development and implementation, including a new initiative for commercial code enhancement.
ding for energy efficiency programs and services. The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","Washington,...
AI summary Washington incorporates energy efficiency as a key resource in its planning and investment decisions. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Seventh Power Plan outlines targets for energy efficiency acquisition, aiming to meet electricity load growth and contribute significantly to the region's future energy needs.
aw, the Council revises the 20-year plan every five years. While Bonneville implements the plan, the plan also serves as a reference document for the region's electric utilities in their own planning. Each investor-owned utility models ene...
AI summary Utilities set biennial targets to achieve all cost-effective electricity conservation. Electric: Targets average ~0.9% (gross) incremental electricity savings per year. Annual conservation targets are available on the Washington UTC site. Natural gas: HB 1257 (2019) establishes an all cost-effective EERS for natural gas. Initial conservation targets must take effect by 2022.
rd-party consultants selected by the utilities. Each electric utility files, develops, and maintains an EM&V Framework as well as an EM&V Plan, which is filed with each Biennial Conservation Plan. Washington uses two of the benefit-cost te...
AI summary Washington uses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Utility Cost Test (UCT) as benefit-cost tests for energy efficiency programs. The Energy Independence Act of 2006 mandates independent third-party evaluations of conservation savings, selected by utilities with input from advisory groups and Commission staff.
overriding the authority of local and regional governmental institutions. As of February 2000, 92% of local communities mandated to plan fully for future growth had adopted comprehensive growth plans. VMT Targets: Washington has also estab...
AI summary Washington State has implemented various policies to reduce VMT and promote sustainable transportation, including VMT reduction targets, complete streets initiatives, and equity-focused transit and EV programs. The state also emphasizes affordable housing and transit access in its planning efforts.
ncludes an alternative fueling mechanism for every vehicle classification. Vendors are also required to provide the federal mpg for each vehicle classification, which is given bid award consideration. Last Updated: July 2020 ","West Virgin...
AI summary The text discusses energy-savings contracts in West Virginia, compliance with building energy codes, and research initiatives at West Virginia University Energy Institute. It highlights legislative actions and code updates related to energy efficiency and sustainability.
gy Program funds, the WV Office of Energy is working with the Homebuilders Association of West Virginia Foundation and Energy Efficient West Virginia to provide training on the 2009 IECC and beyond. Last Reviewed: September 2020 ",,"CHP sy...
AI summary The document discusses the status of CHP systems in West Virginia, noting that they are eligible for net metering but lack supportive policies. It also mentions the repeal of the Alternative and Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard in 2015, which affected CHP's eligibility for energy generation incentives.
he minimum savings in energy usage that will be realized by the state from construction of the project and the contractor shall guarantee that the savings will be realized pursuant to §16.847 (2) (c). The commission, under §13.48 (2) (h),...
AI summary The document outlines requirements for energy efficiency and renewable energy systems in new construction and building projects in Wisconsin, including the use of performance contracts and technical assistance programs to ensure energy savings.
itutional, industrial, and agricultural sectors). The most recent budgets for energy efficiency programs and electricity and natural gas savings can be found in the State Spending and Savings Tables. Last reviewed: July 2019 ","The Public...
AI summary The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin conducts a Strategic Energy Assessment every two years to assess electric energy needs and resources, but it does not result in regulatory orders. Energy efficiency and renewable goals are set every four years, with the most recent goals established in 2010. Funding limitations have led to reductions in energy efficiency targets.