N-1Application - Directory 5 filing
6 passages
C. Description of Directory #5 and Justification for Revisions In this application, NPCC requests the NSEB to approve revisions to the Regional Reliability Criteria contained in Directory #5 Reserve , effective October 15, 2025. Directory...
AI summary NPCC requests approval from the NSEB to revise Directory #5 Reserve , aligning it with NERC Standards and incorporating industry feedback. The revisions were reviewed by the TFCO and RCC, and obtained Full Member approval on October 15, 2025.
Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking (New, Errata or Revisions) 1 12/2/2010 New 2 10/11/2012 Revised/clarified Criteria: (radial source cont., time zero) Revisions 3 9/27/2019 NERC style reformat, Revised/clarified Criteria...
AI summary The document outlines the version history and table of contents for a regulatory proceeding related to reserve criteria and reliability standards. It includes multiple revisions and errata corrections over time, with references to NERC and NPCC standards.
Energy Scheduling and Managing Reserve - R17 . A Balancing Authority providing (allocating or activating) inter- Balancing Area reserve, not as part of a Reserve Sharing Group, shall not count that reserve to meet its own reserve requireme...
AI summary The document outlines rules for energy scheduling and managing reserve, emphasizing the responsibilities of Balancing Authorities in allocating, activating, and recalling reserve energy. It specifies that reserve energy provided outside of a Reserve Sharing Group cannot count toward a Balancing Authority's reserve requirement and that recallable energy must be managed with additional operating reserve.
Sandy Pond flow = 1000 MW NYISO - HQ-TE transaction = -500 MW (flow is NY to HQ-TE) HQ-TE – ISONE transaction = 2000 MW PJM – HQ-TE transaction = -500 MW (flow is PJM to HQ-TE) Area Initial Share/ Assistance Sought First Pass Second Pass T...
AI summary The document presents a table showing energy transactions and generation data across various balancing authorities, including NYISO, ISO-NE, IESO, and PJM. It outlines initial shares, energy picked up during different passes, and total generation after adjustments. The context includes flow data between different entities like Sandy Pond and HQ-TE.
Initial Shares – NYISO and ISO-NE are initially assigned one-half of their respective purchases from HQ-TE. Consequently, under the ordinary SAR rules, they would be 'seeking' assistance for an equal amount. The total assistance sought is...
AI summary The text discusses the allocation of assistance during a contingency scenario involving NYISO, ISO-NE, and NBP-SO, with shares being distributed in two passes. It outlines how additional generation is picked up by Balancing Authorities and how the ACE is restored after the SAR procedure is canceled.
3.0 Radial Source Contingencies with Counter flow Transactions Coincident with energy Transactions delivered out of the Balancing Authority on radial source tie line s, countervailing Transactions may be scheduled simultaneously into the B...
AI summary This section discusses contingency scenarios involving radial source tie lines with counter flow transactions, highlighting potential energy losses and the use of SAR assistance for allocation. It also mentions ramping out interchange schedules when below a reportable event threshold.