064632010 DSM Evaluation Reports 2/28/2011
838 passages
ENT PRODUCTS – RETAIL PROGRAM (POWER DOWN - PD) ............................................................... 14 3.4.1 CFL Component ...........................................................................................................
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency programs and initiatives, including retail programs, direct installation, appliance rebates, and low-income household support. It also references an impact and process evaluation executive summary by NSPI, indicating a focus on assessing program effectiveness and processes.
NMR Evaluation 2010 DSM Programs Executive Summary Page 1 Executive Summary 1 DSM Portfolio Performance 1.1 Overview This document provides a summary of the evaluation of 2010 electric Demand Side Management programs in Nova Scotia. NMR co...
AI summary This executive summary evaluates the performance of Nova Scotia's 2010 Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, conducted by NMR for Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The evaluation found that the programs were generally well-run and efficient, meeting their 2010 savings targets despite challenges. The DSM plan was approved by the Utility and Review Board (UARB) in August 2009.
results for the 2010 program year. NMR Evaluation 2010 DSM Programs Executive Summary Page 2 Table 1-1: 2010 UARB Approved Savings Targets and NMR Results (Net Installed Annual Energy and Demand Savings at the Generator) 2010 Targets 2010...
AI summary The 2010 DSM program evaluation by NMR shows that residential and commercial and industrial (C&I) programs exceeded or met their energy and demand savings targets. Residential programs achieved higher savings than targets, while C&I programs also met or exceeded their goals, with some programs like Efficient Products - Direct Install surpassing targets significantly.
.41 Small Business Lighting Solutions 13.98 3.30 11.21 1.53 C&I TOTAL 63.94 12.37 62.60 10.49 PORTFOLIO TOTAL 81.13 16.63 84.97 16.38 Includes the Power Down (Retail) and Appliance Retirement and Replacement program components. Includes Re...
AI summary The DSM Administrator's portfolio of conservation programs exceeded 2010 energy savings targets by 5%, achieving 3.84 GWh in savings. The Efficient Products - Residential program exceeded its target by 153%, with the CFL markdown component contributing 72% of the savings. Other programs also exceeded their targets by significant margins.
In 2010, the CFL component of the Efficient Products – Retail program accounted for 88% of the program‘s energy savings from retail product sales. As a result of the upcoming phase-out of incandescent bulbs starting in January 2012, the...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Retail program and Direct Install program are facing challenges due to the phase-out of incandescent bulbs and the diminishing energy savings from CFLs. Other programs, such as the Low Income Households and New Houses programs, significantly underperformed their energy savings targets.
it will be critical for Efficiency Nova Scotia to take early steps to prevent such problems because they will become magnified when the new organization scales up to meet more ambitious savings goals.
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia is urged to take early steps to prevent problems that will worsen as the organization scales up to meet more ambitious savings goals.
ns (e.g. monthly portfolio and program reports). If possible, incorporate data likely to be needed for project assessments (such as historical billing data) into the data tracking system. 1.4 Looking Ahead to 2011 As Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia reviewed the performance of its programs from 2008 to 2010, noting that commercial and industrial sectors contributed over two-thirds of total energy and demand savings. Residential programs accounted for less than one-third. The Efficient Products Direct Install and CFL programs were key contributors but may face limitations due to the phase-out of incandescent bulbs in 2012.
<1 <1 1 5 1 3 BER 1 <1 <1 <1 In summary, the portfolio has relied heavily on deriving savings from the commercial sector and, until now, the DSM Administrator has not been able to establish a solid foothold in the residential sector, aside...
AI summary The DSM Administrator has struggled to establish a strong presence in the residential sector, relying mainly on commercial sector savings. New programs like EEH and ARR are expected to provide significant energy savings in 2011. Efficiency Nova Scotia, as a new organization, faces challenges in meeting its increased energy savings goals due to organizational growth and diminishing savings from existing programs.
f 2010. However, even the new minimum requirement of EnerGuide 83 did not set significant stretch goals for participants, who could exceed this rating simply by installing a heat pump. The Business Energy Rebates program was a new program...
AI summary The document discusses the Business Energy Rebates program and its higher free-ridership rates due to prescriptive measures. It also highlights net-to-gross ratios for various energy efficiency programs, with some programs like Efficient Products –Retail: CFLs showing high ratios due to spillover effects.
nly source of concern about the program expressed by some participants. In addition, the DSM Administrator should work with participants to help secure additional energy savings from their businesses. 3.2.2 Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) For...
AI summary The text discusses concerns about the Demand Side Management (DSM) program and suggests that the DSM Administrator should collaborate with participants to achieve additional energy savings. It also mentions the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program for 2010, noting that NMR focused on measuring impacts rather than improving the program, as it will be terminated with the enactment of legislation mandating T8 lighting.
will become increasingly important for the DSM Administrator to monitor the performance of Delivery Agents in order to achieve 2011 targets and to ensure continued high levels of customer service. NMR Evaluation 2010 DSM Programs Executive...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down (PD) program's CFL component is expected to reach the limits of its energy savings potential due to the phase-out of incandescent bulbs in 2012. In response, the PD program diversified its energy efficiency measures by including light fixtures, controls, and appliances, though these new measures are unlikely to match the energy savings achieved by CFLs.
ased only if needed. The PD program should consider focusing instead on new construction and major renovation projects for promoting fixtures and controls such as programmable thermostats and dimmers. 3.4.3 Appliance Rebates Component As w...
AI summary The PD program is advised to focus on new construction and major renovations to promote energy-efficient fixtures and controls. The appliance rebate component should target higher efficiency levels to reduce free-ridership and increase energy savings, potentially using CEE's SEHA performance tiers and offering packaged rebates for multiple efficient appliance purchases.
One possible approach might be to require customers to pay for a portion of the cost for the energy efficiency measures offered by the program and to continue to offer installation services for free. 3.6 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Progr...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program faced challenges due to the withdrawal of federal rebates and uncertainty about its continuation. Despite these issues, it exceeded its energy savings goals. The DSM Administrator is advised to rebuild trust with Delivery Agents and reinforce program infrastructure to ensure continued success.
he DSM Administrator work to overcome these barriers as a cursory review of statistics from NRCan suggest that there are substantial opportunities for an existing home retrofit program such as EEH. NMR Evaluation 2010 DSM Programs Executiv...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program (NH) saw increased participation due to the 2010 Nova Scotia building code raising energy efficiency standards. However, the program's impact on energy efficiency was limited, as participation was largely driven by heat pump incentives rather than overall energy efficiency goals. Free-ridership was also high among builders and homeowners.
gn of any future program needs to address a number of issues including screening free riders, revising incentive structures, timing of promotions, and careful attention to planning and communications. 3.8.2 Appliance Replacement The replac...
AI summary The DSM Administrator's Appliance Replacement Program faced challenges in reaching the multi-family market due to limited resources and the pilot program's short term. NMR recommends continuing the program to build relationships and explore future opportunities in this sector.
family sector. Pursuant to developing NMR Evaluation 2010 DSM Programs Executive Summary Page 17 program offerings for the multi-family sector, the DSM Administrator should seek to gain a better understanding of this market in Nova Scotia....
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 DSM programs highlights the need for a better understanding of the multi-family sector in Nova Scotia, noting split incentives as a barrier to energy efficiency. The LIH program is delivered through REAP Delivery Agents and Energy Advisors, with high participant satisfaction and positive outcomes such as improved comfort and energy bill reductions.
Program Finding Recommendation Commercial C&I-F4. C&I-R4. and In contrast to 2008 and 2009, relatively few 2010 respondents Conduct training sessions with energy efficiency contractors and Industrial reported that they had first heard of t...
AI summary The C&I Custom program saw limited awareness from contractors and vendors in 2010, but external parties were primarily responsible for specifying installed measures. Marketing efforts like adding a Sales Lead and print advertising increased participation. Recommendations include training contractors and developing marketing tools to improve outreach.
respondents (29%) reported that participation in the SBLS program actions after participating in the SBLS program. The DSM had influenced them to take additional actions on their own. When Administrator should consider expanding program of...
AI summary Respondents participating in the SBLS program reported that it influenced them to take additional energy efficiency actions. However, nearly half of respondents indicated they were unaware of additional measures, highlighting a need for expanded program offerings to help small businesses identify and pursue further energy efficiency opportunities.
Program Finding Recommendation Efficient DI-F1. DI-R1. Lighting While around one out of four respondents in 2008, 2009 and 2010 The DSM Administrator should consider using email to contact Products (23%, 25% and 27%) reported having first...
AI summary The text discusses the effectiveness of email as a communication tool for the Direct Install (DI) program, noting a significant increase in email awareness from 1% in 2008 to 21% in 2010. It also highlights that financial benefits were the primary motivation for customer participation, with 79% citing energy cost savings as a key factor.
Program Finding Recommendation Efficient DI-F7. DI-R7. Lighting According to self-reported data, even after participating in the DI The DSM Administrator should make an effort to install CFLs in all Products program, there is significant p...
AI summary The DI program's findings indicate that despite participation, many households did not fully utilize the opportunity to install additional CFLs. Additionally, awareness of LED exit lights remained low, suggesting a need for continued promotion of this component of the program.
actually installed additional LEDs after participating in the DI program. DI-F9. DI-R9. According to self-reported data, even after participating in the DI The DSM Administrator should make an effort to install LEDs in all program there re...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 DSM program indicates that while most participants were satisfied, there was significant potential for further LED installation among participants. Despite participation, many exit signs still did not have LEDs installed, indicating room for improvement in program implementation.
other three respondents gave the program a rating of three. With the sole exception of rebate amounts, the other specific aspects of the program each received high satisfaction ratings from the majority of respondents. BER-F6. BER-R6. Desp...
AI summary The BER program received high satisfaction ratings overall, but respondents were least satisfied with rebate amounts. Participants noted that rebates did not provide enough incentive to implement energy-efficient measures. The program manager acknowledged the need to adjust incentives based on feedback and cost-effectiveness.
Program Finding Recommendation New NH-F1. NH-R1. Houses Implementation of the NH program entailed multiple phases and a Under these circumstances, the program has two choices for its Program variety of people were involved in delivering th...
AI summary The New Houses Program's implementation involved multiple phases and stakeholders. Despite a minimum EnerGuide 83 requirement, many homes could meet this by installing heat pumps, making the program function as a heat pump initiative. The program is advised to raise the EnerGuide level to 85 or 90 over time or shift to direct incentives for specific measures to improve cost-effectiveness and efficiency.
Program Finding Recommendation New NH-F3. NH-R3. Houses Despite the increased awareness about NH in 2010 from newspaper Continue to build awareness through marketing to homeowners in Program ads or stories (cited by homeowners regarding wh...
AI summary The New Houses Program (NH) received feedback indicating that while awareness increased in 2010, more marketing is needed. Homeowners participated due to energy cost savings, and builders were motivated by energy efficiency benchmarks and market demand. Marketing should continue to emphasize energy savings and the EnerGuide label.
system were not used (i.e., incentives for specific measures mentioned in NH-R1 were used instead), this would not be an option. NH-F6. NH-R6. Aside from the HOT 2000 reports and EnerGuide rating, builders The NH program should develop an...
AI summary The text discusses challenges faced by builders in the Nova Scotia Home Energy Program (NH), including confusion over program changes, lack of clear information and training, and uncertainty regarding support for the HOT2000 report. Builders expressed a need for better education, marketing, and clarity on program requirements.
gular communication with builders will also help improve satisfaction with this aspect of program delivery. NH-F12. NH-R12. Prescriptive measures, such as solar hot water heaters and water Solar hot water heaters and water heater tank insu...
AI summary The text discusses the modeling of various energy efficiency measures in HOT2000, including solar hot water heaters, water heater tank insulation, CFLs, and water heater pipe wrap insulation. It highlights inconsistencies in how these measures are modeled and suggests improvements for accurate savings calculations.
participants to sign during the initial audit and the final audit. This form would allow the DSM Administrator access to customer contact information which would aid in program evaluations. EEH-F5. EEH-R5. The 2009 evaluation had found tha...
AI summary The text discusses the EEH program's contractor selection process, noting that it places the full burden on customers and lacks contractor training. It suggests that future programs should use pre-approved, certified contractors to improve efficiency and customer choice.
Program Finding Recommendation EnerGuide EEH-F6. EEH-R6. Existing The EEH program has both resource acquisition and market In order to achieve its market transformation goals, any future transformation goals. A pool of well trained contrac...
AI summary The EEH program aims to achieve both resource acquisition and market transformation goals. It emphasizes the importance of contractor training to ensure proper installation of energy efficiency measures and to promote energy-efficient products and services. The withdrawal of federal rebates and the transition of DSM program administration are noted as factors requiring attention in future program development.
Program Finding Recommendation EnerGuide EEH-F10. EEH-R10. Existing Among the most important reason mentioned for having homes Promotions for the new program should emphasize to customers Houses evaluated by an Energy Advisor were that res...
AI summary The evaluation of the Existing Houses Program highlights that participants valued energy bill savings and home efficiency insights. However, cost was a barrier to implementing recommended upgrades. Comfort improvements were widely noted, suggesting additional benefits beyond energy savings.
change in the comfort of their homes. They most frequently reported energy benefits. It is possible that customers are unaware of the that temperatures were more even throughout their homes (71%) and effect that program upgrades can have o...
AI summary The text discusses customer feedback on home comfort improvements from energy efficiency upgrades, noting that even temperature distribution and reduced drafts were commonly reported. It also highlights the effectiveness of specific measures such as electronic thermostats and high-efficiency heat pumps, while identifying less effective measures like hot air furnaces.
Program Finding Recommendation EnerGuide EEH-F14. EEH-R14. Existing NMR found that the program was double counting savings for a The new program should remove the potential for double counting Houses number of measures. Any of the five hea...
AI summary The EnerGuide Existing Houses Program was found to have double-counted savings for certain measures. The recommendation suggests removing double-counting by applying prescriptive savings only to measures that do not affect EnerGuide ratings or energy consumption in HOT2000 models.
Program Finding Recommendation Low LIH-F4. LIH-R4. Income Customers were motivated to participate in the program primarily Continue to promote the savings benefits of the program with an Households because of energy savings and the associa...
AI summary The Low Income Households Program was effective in motivating participation through energy savings and financial benefits, with 48% of participants citing energy cost savings as a primary motivator. The program led to a 40% reduction in energy bills for some participants, and improved comfort levels were reported by 61% of respondents. The recommendation emphasizes promoting the program's benefits and clarifying its cost-free nature.
Program Finding Recommendation Low LIH-F20. LIH-R20. Income Some respondents reported a substantial discrepancy between the Continue to require the Delivery Agent to walk participants around Households measures that were recorded as having...
AI summary The Low Income Households Program faced challenges with verifying installed energy efficiency measures, as reported by respondents. Verification rates dropped from 95% in 2009 to 77% in 2010, possibly due to poor recall or incomplete installations. Quality control activities increased, including third-party inspections and participant sign-offs. Education on energy-efficient practices was recommended to improve long-term energy savings.
consumers on continued energy efficient information from the energy audit, there was a change in their behavior practices offers a payback in energy savings long after a customer with regard to their use of energy at home: 51% now turn off...
AI summary The program has achieved high overall satisfaction (90%) with participants reporting behavioral changes and increased interest in energy efficiency. However, satisfaction with specific aspects like energy conservation measures, presentations, and work quality declined between 2009 and 2010. Participants recommended improving the quality of work as a key area for improvement.
Program Findings Recommendations Efficient PD:CFL-F1. PD:CFL-R1. Products – With the approaching phase-out of incandescent bulbs in 2012, the PD The DSM Administrator should start paring back on incentives for Retail program will need to d...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Retail Program (Power Down - CFLs) found that the program fell short of its 2010 goal of specialty CFL sales, with regular CFLs dominating. The program discontinued in-store giveaway events, which were previously effective. Recommendations include reducing incentives for regular CFLs and increasing education on specialty CFLs.
Program Findings Recommendations Efficient PD:CFL-F3. PD:CFL-R3. Products – A number of program and non-program factors indicate that there is The PD program should work with retailers to develop/expand Retail likely to be a substantial ne...
AI summary The text discusses the need for improved CFL disposal and recycling in Nova Scotia due to increased adoption of CFLs and the 2012 phase-out of incandescent bulbs. It recommends developing recycling locations and collecting baseline data, as well as considering an incandescent bulb bounty program.
PD:CFL-R8. During an on-site store visit by an NMR representative, it was difficult To the extent possible, the program should reach agreements with to tell which specific items were discounted, especially for dimmers. participating retail...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 DSM programs highlights challenges in ensuring consistent signage and advertising for energy-efficient products, such as CFLs, due to varying practices among retailers. NMR representatives noted difficulties in identifying discounted items and the lack of standardized informational content on product tags.
Program Findings Recommendations Efficient PD:F&C, APP-F1. PD:F&C, APP-R1. Products – While lighting products are often purchased in the fall, major Consider starting the program earlier in the year, to avoid Retail appliances such as refr...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Retail Program (Power Down – Fixtures, Controls & Appliance) findings highlight that major appliances are often purchased when existing ones fail or during home remodeling, not at year-end. Retailers suggest starting the program earlier to avoid holiday season conflicts and recommend advance notice for product stock preparation and promotion.
improving the energy efficiency of the properties such as increased tenant comfort, higher tenant satisfaction, and reduced tenant turnover. NMR Impact and Process Evaluation: Efficient Products Retail Program 2010 February 25, 2011 Final...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program, focusing on improving energy efficiency in properties, leading to benefits such as increased tenant comfort, higher tenant satisfaction, and reduced tenant turnover. The evaluation was conducted by NMR Group, Inc., and submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
............................................. 5 1.3.1 APP: Program Theory ..............................................................................................................................5 1.3.2 APP: Program Logic Model .........
AI summary The document outlines the structure of an impact evaluation for energy efficiency programs, focusing on components such as Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), energy star qualified indoor light fixtures, and various control devices like programmable thermostats and timers. It includes sections on program theory, logic models, and estimated energy savings.
.................................................................................. 21 3.2.4 Dimmer Switches ......................................................................................................................................
AI summary The text outlines sections of an impact evaluation report, focusing on fixtures, controls, and appliance rebates. It discusses gross and net impacts, free-ridership, and spillover effects related to energy efficiency programs. Sections include dimmer switches, power bars, and ENERGY STAR appliances.
.................... 55 5.11.3 CFL Purchase Plans ............................................................................................................................... 60 5.12 SATISFACTION ...........................................
AI summary The document outlines various sections related to program evaluations, including fixtures and controls, appliances, and satisfaction metrics. It discusses methodology, retailer participation, and program impact on product sales, as well as demographic and satisfaction data.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM ENERGY SAVINGS ESTIMATES.........................................................................II TABLE 2-1: ENERGY AND DEMAND SAVINGS ESTIMATION PARAMETERS ....................................... 10 TABLE 2-...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables that outline energy savings estimates and evaluations for various programs and measures. The tables include data on energy and demand savings, estimation parameters, tracked savings, and free-ridership estimation questions. These tables are likely used for assessing the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives.
..................................................................... 38 TABLE 4-7: FREE-RIDERSHIP: CLOTHES WASHERS................................................................................... 39 TABLE 4-8: FREE-RIDERSHIP BY MEASURE—...
AI summary The text references tables related to free-ridership and appliance energy savings estimates, indicating a focus on program evaluation and energy efficiency measures.
NMR TABLE 5-1: SAMPLE SIZE AND SAMPLING ERROR ..................................................................................... 42 TABLE 5-2: LEVEL OF FAMILIARITY WITH ENERGY STAR™[][] .....................................................
AI summary The text lists various tables related to energy efficiency programs, including customer awareness, purchasing behavior, and barriers to adopting CFLs (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) and energy-efficient products. The data spans different years and focuses on program participation and knowledge of energy labels.
NMR TABLE 5-49: EDUCATION LEVEL – 2008 AND 2009 ........................................................................................ 70 TABLE 5-50: RESPONDENT GENDER – 2010 .................................................................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to customer participation and satisfaction with energy efficiency programs, including data on education levels, gender distribution, product sales trends, and rebate impacts. It provides insights into program effectiveness and customer behavior.
........................................................................... 77 TABLE 6-10: OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH PROGRAM ........................................................................ 77 TABLE 6-11: REASON FOR DISSATISFACTION...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to customer satisfaction, program participation barriers, and the impact of rebate programs. It includes data on satisfaction levels, reasons for dissatisfaction, employment statistics, and sales trends associated with energy efficiency initiatives.
N FIXTURES & CONTROLS LOGIC MODEL ...................................................4 FIGURE 1-3: POWER DOWN APPLIANCE REBATES LOGIC MODEL ........................................................8 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, focusing on its logic models and fixtures and controls. The evaluation likely includes an analysis of program effectiveness, implementation, and outcomes related to energy efficiency and demand-side management.
..8 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page I
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, focusing on its effectiveness and impact. It provides an overview of the program's objectives, implementation, and outcomes related to energy efficiency and conservation efforts.
Executive Summary This report presents the results of the process and impact evaluations of the Efficient Products Retail program which was marketed under the name Power Down (PD). NMR Group, Inc. (NMR) conducted the evaluation. In 2010, t...
AI summary This report evaluates the Efficient Products Retail program (Power Down) in Nova Scotia, covering products like CFLs, light fixtures, and appliances. NMR Group conducted the evaluation, assessing program implementation through interviews and surveys with participants, non-participants, and retailers.
d savings estimates can be found in Table 1. All savings presented are at the generator level (based on line losses of 11.88%) and the CFL savings include the impact of interactive effects of heating. Table 1: 2010 Program Energy Savings E...
AI summary The document presents energy savings estimates from various programs in 2010, including CFLs, ENERGY STAR products, and thermostats. It distinguishes between gross and net savings at the generator level, factoring in line losses and interactive effects of heating.
es washers 114.2 548 15% 17.1 82 Total Program 2,078.0 9,678 107% 2,234.8 10,361 Findings and Recommendations3 The CFL component of the PD program is faced with the upcoming phase-out of incandescent bulbs starting in January 2012.4 The fi...
AI summary The CFL component of the PD program is reaching the limits of its energy-saving potential due to the phase-out of incandescent bulbs starting in 2012. The evaluation used surveys and interviews to estimate net-to-gross ratios, excluding some measures like programmable thermostats due to low projected energy savings.
its sources for achieving energy efficiency goals by expanding the range of energy efficiency measures that it incentivized. At the retail level, these other energy efficiency measures included ENERGY STAR indoor light fixtures, programmab...
AI summary The document discusses the effectiveness of various energy efficiency measures within the Power Down program. It highlights that while other energy efficiency products like programmable thermostats and ENERGY STAR appliances are incentivized, they are infrequently purchased due to high costs and long lifespans. In contrast, CFLs remain the primary source of energy savings. NMR believes the PD program will struggle to achieve similar savings from these other products.
difficult for the PD program to have these other retail products provide anywhere near the energy savings that were derived from the CFLs. Under these circumstances, NMR believes that the PD program should consider the following steps to h...
AI summary NMR suggests steps to mitigate the impact of removing regular CFLs from the PD program, including focusing on specialty CFLs, incandescent bounty programs, LED rebates, consumer education, and promoting energy-efficient appliances. The evaluation of the program's free ridership highlights limitations in rebate timing and the net-to-gross ratio for certain products.
esponses. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page V Appliance Rebates Component As with fixtures and controls, retailers interviewed reported that the majority of refrigerator and clothes washer sales would likely have taken place i...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program's appliance rebate component faced challenges due to high free-ridership. Retailers indicated that most appliance sales would have occurred regardless of the program. To improve effectiveness, the DSM Administrator could rebate Tier 3 appliances and offer packaged rebates for multiple efficient appliances. A year-round program may be more effective to align with customer purchasing behavior.
rovided on the DSM Administrator‘s and CNS‘s websites, associate training, and associate contests. Unlike in 2008 and 2009, the program did not include any in-store events or an educational component. 1.1.1 CFL: Program Theory The program...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down (PD) program focused on promoting Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) through revised program theory and logic models. The program aimed for market saturation of CFLs in Nova Scotia, with high adoption rates already observed prior to the program's implementation.
residential customers said they used CFLs.8 Therefore, the CFL component of the PD program aims to encourage customers to ―think beyond the mini-twister‖ and learn that there are specialty CFL bulbs for almost every application in the hous...
AI summary The PD program aims to encourage residential customers to use ENERGY STAR-qualified CFLs by offering incentives through retail partnerships. In 2010, the program shifted strategies to provide discounts for all ENERGY STAR-qualified CFLs, regardless of type or pack size, and worked with retailers to promote in-store marketing and educational events.
Installation. The CFLs purchased through the program will be installed in residential homes in Nova Scotia. Availability of CFLs. The above strategy and projections for uptake are based on retailers having sufficient CFL bulbs availabl...
AI summary The PD program aims to promote the installation of energy-efficient CFLs in Nova Scotia homes through retailer partnerships and customer outreach. Key barriers include awareness, saturation of CFLs, and retailer engagement. Short-term outcomes include discounted CFLs, customer awareness, and energy savings.
by the program, customers purchase ENERGY STAR CFLs. Energy savings and bill reductions. Energy savings are achieved when customers install CFLs in their homes. Mid-Term Outcomes Participants are more knowledgeable about energy efficie...
AI summary The Power Down Program encourages customers to purchase ENERGY STAR CFLs, leading to energy savings, increased knowledge about energy efficiency, and greater demand for energy-efficient lighting. Retailers also recognize the demand and view energy efficiency programs as business opportunities.
programs and promote energy efficiency. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 4 Long-Term Outcomes Improved availability of energy efficient equipment. Increased understanding of the benefits of energy efficiency and the sustain...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, focusing on long-term outcomes such as increased availability of energy-efficient equipment, residential adoption of energy-efficient practices, and sustained energy savings. It includes a logic model for the CFL component of the program.
rmostats for electric baseboard heaters (single and multi-packs), 524 indoor lighting timers, 2,139 heavy duty outdoor or pool timers, 221 power bars with integrated timers, and 3,781 dimmer switches.
AI summary The text lists the number of various energy-efficient devices distributed, including thermostats, timers, power bars, and dimmer switches, indicating efforts in demand-side management and energy efficiency programs.
Customer education and outreach. The PD program designs and distributes marketing materials to increase awareness among residential customers. Marketing efforts include radio, print, in-store signage, mail drop and the Internet. Collab...
AI summary The PD program focuses on customer education and outreach through various marketing channels, including radio, print, and in-store signage, and collaborates with retailers to promote energy efficiency. Key assumptions include retailer participation, effective marketing, and the availability of CFLs. Barriers include awareness and retailer engagement.
lack of interest in or knowledge of the program could lead to poor participation by retailers and poor sales of qualified fixtures and controls. Short-Term Outcomes Discounted fixtures and controls available at participating retailers. A...
AI summary The Power Down program aims to increase participation in energy efficiency by offering discounts on qualified fixtures and controls through retailers. Outreach and marketing efforts ensure customer awareness, leading to purchases and energy savings. Retailers are trained to promote the program, and customers benefit from reduced bills.
fixtures and controls in their homes. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 3 Mid-Term Outcomes Participants are more knowledgeable about energy efficiency. Participants gain first-hand understanding about the benefits of purcha...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program highlights mid-term and long-term outcomes, including increased participant knowledge, comfort, and demand for energy-efficient equipment, as well as improved availability and standardization of energy-efficient products in the residential market.
stomers. Sustained energy savings. As a result of increased supply and demand for energy efficient lighting equipment, sustained energy savings are achieved in the residential market. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 4 1.2....
AI summary The document discusses the 2010 Power Down Program, focusing on its logic model and the sustained energy savings achieved through increased supply and demand for energy-efficient lighting equipment in the residential market.
Incentives and rebates. The program provides point-of-sale (POS) discounts to offset the cost of purchasing ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers at retailers throughout Nova Scotia. Buying down the cost of these appliances at PO...
AI summary The program offers point-of-sale discounts for ENERGY STAR appliances, along with customer education and collaborative marketing efforts to increase awareness and adoption. It assumes retailer cooperation, effective marketing, and sufficient appliance availability to achieve its goals.
Customers are aware of the program. Customers are made aware of the available discounts through marketing materials, such as in-store signage and direct mailings. Customers may also learn about the program through collaborative marketing...
AI summary The program aims to increase awareness and adoption of ENERGY STAR appliances through marketing and discounts. Customers benefit from energy savings and bill reductions, while retailers recognize the demand for energy-efficient products and view energy efficiency as a business opportunity.
etailers look for more opportunities to leverage energy efficiency programs and promote energy efficiency. Long-Term Outcomes Improved availability of energy efficient appliances. Increased understanding of the benefits of energy efficie...
AI summary The text discusses the long-term outcomes of energy efficiency programs, focusing on increased availability of energy-efficient appliances and sustained energy savings. It also outlines the evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program, specifically the CFL component, and mentions the use of a difference of differences approach to estimate net energy savings.
y that existing household stocks and stocks remaining in storage in distribution channels will mean that incandescent bulbs will be available through the life of CFLs installed in the 2008 program.‖ NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Progra...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program under three scenarios for energy savings. The second scenario assumes new energy performance standards for general-service lamps in 2012, allowing only one year of savings. The third scenario assumes standards exclude specialty bulbs, resulting in different savings calculations for regular and specialty CFLs.
d Assumptions. January, 2010. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 18 Quantec (2004). Residential New Construction High Efficiency Appliance Lighting: End of Year Assessment. April, 2004.18 NMR and RLW (2007). Process and Imp...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program, referencing studies on energy savings from lighting upgrades. It highlights the use of data from the OPA report and an Efficiency Maine evaluation, including assumptions about bulb replacement and usage patterns.
that the average displaced wattage from the rebated fixtures was 50 Watts. Using the equation below, the NMR team developed annual gross per unit savings estimates for interior fixtures of 34 kWh. NMR applied the annual savings value ident...
AI summary The NMR report estimates that the Power Down Program resulted in 274,074 kWh of annual savings from rebated interior light fixtures, which is 73% lower than the program's tracking database. Differences are attributed to variations in bulb replacement assumptions, daily usage estimates, and in-service rate adjustments.
avings estimates for any of the ―controls‖ measures rebated through the program. This section details the reports we reviewed, and outlines the assumptions made by the OPA for their savings estimates. 3.2.1 Programmable Thermostats for Ele...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility Board (NMR) evaluated the savings estimates for programmable thermostats in the Power Down Program. The program assumes 63.15 kWh/year savings per thermostat, but studies by Quantec and ODC estimated significantly higher values, such as 3,750 kWh and 814 kWh, respectively.
outdoor/heavy duty timers provided the most savings under the evaluated estimates (821 MWh at the meter). Power bars with timers and dimmer switches had the smallest impact on overall program savings. Table 3-7: Detailed Comparison of Savi...
AI summary The table compares the savings from various energy efficiency measures. Outdoor/heavy duty timers provided the most savings (821 MWh at the meter), while power bars with timers and dimmer switches had the smallest impact on overall program savings. The evaluated savings were lower than the tracked savings, with a 29% decrease in total savings.
er Down Program Page 32 The following tables show the final overall unweighted and weighted free-ridership for each measure. Table 3-15: Free-Ridership by Measure—Fixtures and Controls Free-ridership Measure Unweighted Weighted ES indoor l...
AI summary The document presents tables showing free-ridership rates for various energy efficiency measures under the Power Down Program, including indoor light fixtures, timers, and thermostats. It also provides net energy and demand savings for the Fixtures and Controls (F&C) components of the program in 2010.
rio Power Authority report titled ―2010 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions.‖30 This is reasonable as the OPA report offers savings estimates for each of the products rebated through the PD program. 4.1.1 ENERGY STAR Refrigerators Accord...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of savings estimates for ENERGY STAR refrigerators rebated through the Power Down (PD) program, referencing studies and reports including the Ontario Power Authority (2010) and others. The Nova Scotia Utility Board (NMR) reviewed these sources to assess the reasonableness of the program's savings estimate.
33 This study was sponsored by Nova Scotia Power. 34 This study was prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission CPUC and sponsored by California‘s Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs). NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page...
AI summary This study, sponsored by Nova Scotia Power and prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission, evaluated the savings from ENERGY STAR qualified refrigerators in the 2010 Power Down Program. The OPA and Mowris & Carlson reports were reviewed, and the OPA's estimate was used due to its reasonableness and lack of justification for change in the current savings estimate.
Number of units 2,191 Savings per unit (kWh) 112.8 Total savings (kWh) 247,145 4.1.2 ENERGY STAR Clothes Washers The PD program currently assumes that ENERGY STAR qualified clothes washers have savings of 181.27 kWh per year. The program‘s...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy savings assumptions for ENERGY STAR qualified clothes washers in the PD program, referencing multiple reports including the Cadmus (2010) study. The current assumption is based on the OPA report and federal standards, and the NMR team used the Cadmus report to develop savings estimates.
Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs). NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 35 and electric washing machines to determine the savings from ENERGY STAR clothes washers. The Cadmus report justified the decision to include dryer and water...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program discusses the energy savings from ENERGY STAR qualified clothes washers, including dryer and water heater savings. The savings estimate was 0.8 kWh per cycle, leading to annual savings of 242 kWh per unit. The program rebated 2,025 units, resulting in 490,050 kWh saved, a 34% increase over current estimates.
gy and demand savings for the APP component of the PD program in 2010. For the 2010 program year, the generator-level impacts were estimated at 160 MWh of energy savings and 31.5 kW of demand savings. Table 4-9: Appliance Energy Savings Es...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program's appliance energy savings were evaluated, showing 160 MWh of energy savings and 31.5 kW of demand savings. The evaluation included interviews with program staff and residential customer surveys, with results used for both process and impact evaluations.
r and one interview in December with the implementation contractor‘s project manager. The interviews covered a variety of program- related topics, including program goals, program theory and delivery. 5.1.2 Residential Survey Seventy progr...
AI summary The residential survey identified 31% of participants in the CFL program, higher than previous years, indicating increased adoption. The survey, conducted by NMR's subcontractor, aimed to assess program effectiveness, including spillover effects and in-service rates for CFL purchases.
+9.8% Non-participant survey 260,023 70 +9.8% Overall residential survey 376,845 140 +6.9% 5.2 Program Goals and Design The lighting component of the PD program was designed to achieve energy savings of 2,330.27 MWh through sales of CFLs a...
AI summary The lighting component of the PD program aimed to achieve energy savings through the sale of CFLs and light fixtures. The 2010 Power Down program modified its approach by removing restrictions based on pack size and bulb type, and shifted from in-store events to markdowns and coupons. Communication between the DSM Administrator and implementation contractor was deemed satisfactory.
oduct was approved for a rebate. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 44
AI summary The document discusses the approval of a product for a rebate under the 2010 Power Down Program by NMR. This indicates a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and customer incentives.
presentative tested this by trying to purchase an outdoor timer and the discount did not automatically ring up. When told about the discount, the cashier did not know anything about it and did not know how to ring it up; she needed to get...
AI summary The text discusses an instance where a representative attempted to purchase an outdoor timer with a discount but faced difficulties as the cashier was unaware of the discount. It also highlights survey results from 2010 showing that participants had higher awareness of the ENERGY STAR label compared to non-participants, though there were differences in recognition of ENERGY STAR-qualified heat pumps.
energy efficiency. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 46 Table 5-2: Level of Familiarity with ENERGY STAR™[39][40] 2010 2010 Non- 2010 Total Participants Participants (Weighted)41 Sample size 70 70 140 Very familiar 36% 20%Ω 24...
AI summary This table evaluates the level of familiarity with ENERGY STAR™ among participants in the 2010 Power Down Program. It shows that 24% of participants were very familiar, while 26% were not at all familiar before being described.
t at all familiar before description 16 27 26 Don‘t know 1 1 Table 5-3: ENERGY STAR™ Products Available - 2010 Non- Total Participants Participants (Weighted) Sample size 70 70 140 CFLs 88% 78% 76% Light Fixtures 73% 64% 64% Refrigerators...
AI summary Table 5-3 presents data on the availability of ENERGY STAR™ products in 2010, showing participation rates among different product categories. The table includes metrics for CFLs, light fixtures, refrigerators, clothes washers, and heat pumps, with varying participation rates across categories.
Clothes Washers 90% 94% 90% Heat Pumps 25% 40%Ω 32% Table 5-4: Knowledge of ENERGY STAR™ Label - 2010 (multiple response) Non- Total Participants Participants (Weighted) Sample size 59 50 109 Energy efficient 59% 62% 62% Label on products...
AI summary The table presents data on the knowledge of the ENERGY STAR™ label among participants in 2010, showing low awareness with only 10% of participants recognizing the label on products and 8% understanding the rating system.
tion NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 49 5.9 CFL Purchase Motivations 5.9.1 Participants and Non-participants When asked their reasons for purchasing CFLs during the program period, almost two out of three 2010 participants (...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program evaluation found that 63% of participants purchased CFLs primarily to save energy, with 17% motivated by the need to replace bulbs. Non-participants also cited saving energy as their main motivation (74%), though fewer purchased CFLs during the program period.
2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Heard they were safer 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% Because of an ad 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Because of ad 0% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% Recommended 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 1% Fit better in fixtures 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% <1% Don't know 0% 3% 3% 0% 3% 2% NMR Evaluatio...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program found that 73% of non-participants did not purchase CFLs because they did not need them, a higher percentage than in previous years. Many non-participants already had CFLs installed, suggesting lack of need rather than resistance to purchasing.
0% 2% 0% Bulb contains mercury 0% 2% 0% Renting 0% 2% 0% Blind 0% 2% 0% Don‘t know what they are 0% 2% 0% I‘m old, stick with what I have 0% 2% 0% Paperwork is inconvenient 0% 2% 0% Unaware of multipacks 0% 2% 0% Not that interested in ene...
AI summary The text presents data on non-participant CFL use and installations from 2008 to 2010, showing a slight decline in the percentage of participants using CFLs and an increase in the average number of CFLs installed.
57 55 65 Average # of CFLs Installed 11.1 13.3 13.9 5.11 CFL Purchase and Use Behaviors 5.11.1 Quantities of CFLs Purchased Table 5-13 shows the estimated number of CFLs purchased by participants and non-participants during October and Nov...
AI summary The text discusses the purchase and use behaviors of CFLs during October and November 2010, highlighting that participants in the program purchased significantly more CFLs than non-participants, with participants averaging nearly ten times as many purchases.
ipants (14%) than 2009 participants (27%) purchased eleven or more CFLs. Similarly, significantly more non-participants reported not purchasing any CFLs in 2010 (90%) than in 2008 (41%) or 2009 (73%). Table 5-13: All CFL Purchases – Progra...
AI summary The data shows that participants in the CFL purchase program purchased significantly more CFLs compared to non-participants. In 2010, 90% of non-participants reported not purchasing any CFLs, while only 0% of participants did. The average number of CFLs purchased by participants was 6.9, compared to 0.7 for non-participants.
0 2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 53 Table 5-14: All CFL Purchases – Program Period – 2008 and 2009 2008 2009 Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants (Weighted) Participants Participants (Weighted) Sample size 57 7...
AI summary The document presents a table summarizing CFL purchases under the 2010 Power Down Program during 2008 and 2009, including sample sizes, average purchases, and distribution across different purchase ranges.
26 8 10 9σ 1Ω σ 2 16 or more 26 3 6 19 6Ω 7 Out of the 483 CFLs purchased by participants during the program period, 327 (67%) were qualifying CFL bulbs and were, therefore, counted as having been purchased through the program. Over the co...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, noting that 67% of the 483 CFLs purchased by participants were qualifying bulbs. Participants in 2010 averaged significantly fewer qualifying CFL purchases (4.7) compared to 2008 (10.8) and 2009 (6.5). Qualifying bulbs were those purchased from participating retailers, including multipacks or specialty CFLs.
327 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 54 In the months prior to the program period, participant purchases (0.48) were almost the same as non- participant (0.51) purchases. In 2010 as a whole, participants (1.05) purchased more...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program led to a significant increase in CFL purchases by participants compared to non-participants, with participants purchasing more than twice as many CFLs on average. This suggests the program successfully motivated increased customer purchases of energy-efficient lighting.
10σ 12 30 12σ 17 16 or more 43 17σ 20 37 19σ 20 Table 5-18: All CFL Purchases – Outside the Program Period – 2010 2010 Non- Total Participants Participants (Weighted) Sample size 70 70 140 Ten month average 4.8 5.1 4.9 Monthly average 0.48...
AI summary The text presents data on compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) purchases outside the Power Down Program period in 2008, 2009, and 2010. The tables provide statistics on sample sizes, averages, and totals for participants and non-participants, highlighting differences in purchasing behavior.
0.46 0.62 .61 0.82 0.56 0.61 Total 268 391 696 487 336 732 5.11.2 In-Service Rate Table 5-20 summarizes participant installations of CFLs purchased during the program period. We asked participants how many of the CFLs they had purchased du...
AI summary The document discusses the installation rate of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) purchased by program participants. 83% of CFLs were in-service, with 17% never installed and less than 1% removed. Participants planned to install 55% of uninstalled CFLs within the next year, showing a slight increase from previous years.
installed CFLs (55%) within the next year. 2010 participants had installed about the same proportion of CFLs as 2009 participants (81%) and significantly more CFLs compared to 2008 participants (68%). Table 5-20: Installation of CFLs Purch...
AI summary The document discusses the installation and removal rates of CFLs (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) over the years 2008 to 2010, noting that participants in 2010 had the highest installation rate at 83%. Some CFLs were removed due to issues like breakage or malfunction, with participants either discarding or storing them.
0 na NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 57 In all three program years, 2008 through 2010, the majority of participants reporting at least one CFL had not been installed indicated ―bought as spares‖ as the primary reason for not...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program evaluation found that most participants who had not installed CFLs kept them in storage, with fewer reporting they were bought as spares compared to previous years.
places to put them 0 0 6% Haven‘t got around to it or forgot 0 3 0 Do not work with three-way switch or dimmer 4 3 0 Don‘t know 86 94 0 Disposition of CFLs Not Installed 2008 Participants 2009 Participants 2010 Participants Sample size 29...
AI summary The table summarizes the disposition of CFLs not installed by participants in 2008, 2009, and 2010, with most respondents indicating they did not know where to place them. The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program highlights that 79% of recently-purchased CFLs replaced incandescent bulbs, with an average wattage of 61 Watts, higher than in previous years.
4 Utility room 5% 0% 3% <1% 6% 2 Office 7% 2% 4% 1% 3% 0 Closet 9% 1% 1%∑ 0%∑ 3% 1 Recreation room na na 1% <1% 2% 0 Garage 7% 1% 7% 2% 0 Den 3% 6% 1% <1%∑ 0 Other na na 1% 1% 6% 6 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 59
AI summary The text presents a table with percentages related to different room types and their energy usage, followed by a reference to the Evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program by NMR.
Table 5-24: Average Wattage of Replaced Bulbs 2008 2009 2010 Room Sample size Wattage Sample size Wattage Sample size Wattage Average for All Rooms 15 52 65 56 64 61 Living room or family room 10 56 36 61 29 60 Kitchen 9 56 29 56 27 64 Din...
AI summary Table 5-24 presents data on the average wattage of replaced bulbs in various rooms from 2008 to 2010, showing changes in bulb wattage across different areas of homes.
n room 0 0 1 60 1 60 Other 0 0 1 60 4 70 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 60 5.11.3 CFL Purchase Plans Participants and non-participants were asked how likely they would be to purchase CFLs in the next year. Similar percentag...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program found that similar percentages of participants and non-participants were likely to purchase CFLs in the next year, with slight variations over time compared to 2008 and 2009.
21% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 62
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Power Down Program, focusing on its effectiveness and outcomes. It discusses the program's impact on energy efficiency and demand-side management, highlighting key metrics and results.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 63 5.12 Satisfaction Both participants and non-participants exhibited high levels of satisfaction with the installed CFLs. More than nine out of ten participants and non-participants (95% and...
AI summary The 2010 Power Down Program saw high satisfaction levels among both participants and non-participants with installed CFLs, though satisfaction with CFLs decreased from 2008 to 2010. A small number of participants and non-participants reported dissatisfaction, citing issues such as bulb burnout and light preference.
Familiar 65% Somewhat Familiar 34% Neither Familiar nor Unfamiliar 1% As shown in Table 6-3, nine out of ten retailers (90%) interviewed sold ENERGY STAR light fixtures and electronic baseboard thermostats in 2010. More than four out of fi...
AI summary The text discusses the sales of ENERGY STAR products by retailers in 2010, highlighting that 90% sold light fixtures and electronic baseboard thermostats, with varying percentages for other products like dimmer switches and power bars with timers. It also notes that most retailers offered rebates for these products during October and November 2010.
1 Don‘t carry rebated 1 products 6.4 Program Impact on Product Sales For each of the four different products classes (light fixtures, power bars with timers, indoor light timers, and heavy duty outdoor or pool timers), retailers were asked...
AI summary The program significantly increased the sales of rebated products, particularly ENERGY STAR light fixtures, during the rebate period. Sales dropped sharply after rebates ended, with the most dramatic decline observed in light fixtures. Comparing 2010 to 2009, sales of rebated products increased across all categories, with power bars with timers showing the highest increase.
ovember 2010. The lowest average increase was a 10% increase for outdoor timers from 60% to 66%; the highest average increase was a 78% increase for power bars with timers from 36% to 64%. (Table 6-5) Table 6-5: Average Percent of Rebated...
AI summary The text presents data on the average percent of rebated product sales for various products under the 2010 Power Down Program, showing increases in sales percentages from January–September 2010 to October–November 2010, with the lowest and highest increases noted for outdoor timers and power bars with timers, respectively.
. The additional rebates offered ranged from $3 to $15; again, the percentages shown for the additional rebates are based on the small number of interviewees that answered these questions. (Table 6-8) Table 6-8: Whether Other Rebates were...
AI summary The text discusses the range of additional rebates offered during the 2010 Power Down Program, ranging from $3 to $15. The percentages of participants who received these rebates are based on a small number of interviewees. Table 6-8 provides data on the distribution of rebates across different product categories and sources.
100% 100% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 77 When asked about the importance of the program rebates to the customers‘ purchasing decisions, there was much more agreement among the retailers that the rebates were important. A...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program indicates that program rebates significantly influenced customer purchasing decisions, particularly for ENERGY STAR light fixtures, indoor and outdoor timers, and power bars with timers. Retailers largely agree on the importance of these rebates.
would be a good idea to do.” NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 80 On the time of year, an interviewee said, “Once we get into Christmas, people aren’t concentrating on buying light fixtures.” Interviewees also noted that recei...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program highlights challenges in timing and communication, with interviewees suggesting improvements such as better signage, earlier distribution of materials, and streamlining the rebate process to enhance participation and efficiency.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Power Down Program Page 82 7 Process Evaluation: Appliances 7.1 Methodology According to the work plan, NMR had planned to conduct a survey of customers who had purchased a rebated ENERGY STAR refrigerator or clothes...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Power Down Program's appliance rebate component faced challenges due to retailers' refusal to provide customer names, leading to a revised methodology involving surveys of retail store managers. Interviews were conducted with store managers and program staff to assess program administration and delivery.
ontractor‘s program manager. Additionally, during the course of the evaluation, NMR had numerous discussions with these program staff regarding various aspects of program administration and delivery. 7.2 Program Goals and Design The Applia...
AI summary The 2010 Nova Scotia Power Down program (PD) included an Appliance Rebate portion (APP) aimed at achieving energy savings through ENERGY STAR appliances. The program was initially offered to chain retailers but later expanded to include independent retailers after protests. Rebates exceeded projections, with sales extending into December.
t to customers‘ purchasing decisions to buy ENERGY STAR clothes washers, while two out of five stated that the rebate had not been important to the purchase decision for clothes washers. ( Table 7-7) Table 7-7: Importance of Program Rebate...
AI summary The text discusses customer purchasing decisions influenced by rebates for ENERGY STAR appliances, with mixed results. Most retailers reported no barriers to participating in the program, though some noted challenges like confusing signage or initial exclusion of independent retailers.
Presentation of Rebate/Incentive to Customer (Multiple responses) Independent Retailers Sample size 6 Displayed next to full price 3 Showed price after rebate 2 Displayed rebate information but ask sales associate 1 rebate value NMR Evalua...
AI summary The document evaluates the marketing of ENERGY STAR appliances by independent retailers under the 2010 Power Down Program. It highlights the frequency and methods of advertising, including newspaper, flyers, and radio/TV, with varying levels of participation across different time periods.
NERGY STAR equivalency table. As such, these calculations are best used as a validation of the parameter from the New England study, which included on-site visits and the installation of data loggers. Table A-1: ENERGY STAR Table of Lighti...
AI summary The document includes an ENERGY STAR equivalency table comparing incandescent bulbs with qualified light bulbs, and references an evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program. The table is presented as a validation tool based on a New England study with on-site visits and data loggers.
://www.energystar.gov/ - January 2010 NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page A2
AI summary The document provides an evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, which is related to energy efficiency initiatives. The evaluation is conducted by NMR, and it includes references to external resources such as the Energystar website.
Table A-2: Displaced Wattage Validation Incandescent Estimated Total Estimated CFL Wattage Equivalent # of CFLs Sold Displaced Wattage Displaced Wattage 4 na 232 na na 5 na 98 na na 7 na 720 na na 9 40 3,762 31 116,622 10 40 1,521 30 45,63...
AI summary Table A-2 provides data on displaced wattage validation, including CFL wattage, equivalent incandescent wattage, number of CFLs sold, and estimated displaced wattage. The data indicates the impact of replacing incandescent bulbs with CFLs on total wattage displacement.
150 50 118 5,900 33 150 101 117 11,817 40 150 146 110 16,060 Unknown na 61,389 na na Total na 179,591 na na NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B1 Appendix B - Questionnaire and Interview Guides NOVA SCOTIA POWER RESIDENTIA...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation study of Nova Scotia Power's energy efficiency programs, specifically the Residential Lighting Program. It includes a phone questionnaire for participants and non-participants, aimed at gathering customer feedback to improve the programs. The survey is conducted by the NMR Group on behalf of Nova Scotia Power and is confidential.
tter. Your responses will be kept strictly confidential—that is your name will not be associated with any of your responses. This survey will take about 15 minutes of your time. Would that be okay? [IF REFUSE, ASK ―Can we schedule a more c...
AI summary The text outlines a survey about awareness of the ENERGY STAR™ label and Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs (CFLs), asking respondents about their familiarity and knowledge of these energy-efficient products. It includes specific questions on product availability in local stores.
1. Yes 2. No 3. DK/Refused [IF AB1=4 OR 5 AND AB2.A = 2 OR 3 and AB2.B = 2 OR 3 (Not familiar with any type of CFL at all) THEN GO TO D1] PB. PURCHASES OF BULBS PB2b1a. [ASK IF AB1 = 1, 2, OR 3 OR AB2.A=1 or AB2.B=1] Between October 1st an...
AI summary The text outlines a survey question related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) between October 1st and November 30th, 2010, and includes instructions for recording the number of bulbs purchased based on pack sizes. It also references the Nova Scotia Power Down program.
_ PB2b1a9. Number of nine-pack CFLs PB2b1a10. Number of ten-pack CFLs PB2b1a11. Number of eleven-pack CFLs PB2b1a12. Number of twelve-pack CFLs [PROGRAMMING NOTE: CALCULATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL CFL BULBS PURCHASED FROM THE DIFFER...
AI summary The text contains forms and instructions for collecting data on the purchase of compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs, including ENERGY STAR-qualified bulbs, as part of the Nova Scotia Power Down program during October and November 2010. Respondents are asked to report the number of bulbs purchased in various pack sizes.
RGY STAR CFLs PB2b1b6. Number of six-pack ENERGY STAR CFLs PB2b1b7. Number of seven-pack ENERGY STAR CFLs PB2b1b8. Number of eight-pack ENERGY STAR CFLs PB2b1b9. Number of nine-pack ENERGY STAR CFLs PB2b1b10. Number of ten-pack ENERGY STAR...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions related to the number of ENERGY STAR CFL bulbs purchased in different pack sizes throughout 2010, with instructions on how to count and record the total number of bulbs purchased by households. It includes a reference to the Nova Scotia Power Down program and instructions for handling responses.
2B2B12 SERIES. 999=DON’T KNOW] PB2B2B. RECORD NUMBER OF ENERGY STAR CFL BULBS— JANUARY – DECEMBER 2010 _ [CHECK: PB2B2b >= PB2B1b] Purchases by pack size of ENERGY STAR CFLs January-December 2010: PB2b2b1. Number of single CFL bulb packs P...
AI summary The document contains a series of data collection fields related to the purchase of ENERGY STAR CFL bulbs under the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, including pack sizes and programming notes for data calculation and survey flow control.
F PB2b1a=0 OR DON’T KNOW THEN SKIP TO NP1a] NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B9 PB2e. Were any of [Insert value from PB2B1A] CFLs that you purchased in October and November specialty CFL bulbs? Specialty compact fluoresc...
AI summary The text is a survey questionnaire related to the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), including specialty bulbs and reasons for purchase.
STORE NAME FROM PB4 – . KEEP A RUNNING COUNT OF PB6b EACH TIME THROUGH: PB6b COUNT SHOULD NOT EXCEED PB2b1. IF NECESSARY, REMIND RESPONDENT OF PB2b1, OR CHANGE PB2b1 VALUE IF RESPONDENT RECONSIDERS NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Pr...
AI summary The text outlines a data collection process for evaluating the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program. It asks respondents to count the number of compact fluorescent light bulbs purchased from a specific store and whether they were ENERGY STAR™-qualified. It also inquires about Nova Scotia Power promotions related to the purchase of these bulbs.
ulbs at [PB4 STORE NAME]? This may have included such things as representatives providing information, and signs, or posters. [REPEAT FOR EACH STORE]. 1. Yes 2. No 3. (Don‘t Know PB6a2. Were you aware that Nova Scotia Power was offering a...
AI summary The text discusses a survey about customer awareness and behavior regarding a discount on compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) offered by Nova Scotia Power. It includes questions about prior purchase intentions, the influence of the discount, and the number of bulbs purchased.
o 5, where 1 indicates the discount ‗had no influence at all on you purchase decision‘ and 5 indicate that the discount was ‗extremely influential to your purchase decision.‘ C. CFL IN-SERVICE RATE C2. Earlier you said that you purchased a...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process to evaluate the installation and removal of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) purchased under the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program. It asks respondents to report the number of bulbs currently in use, the number removed, and the reasons for removal.
you have yet to install do you plan on installing within the coming year? ENTER NUMBER OF BULBS _ [NOTE: IF #C2 (#installed) = 0, THEN SKIP to #C13 (Satisfaction)] Installed CFLs C10. Of the [INSERT #C2(number installed)] compact fluoresce...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about the installation of compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs), including how many were installed, which rooms they were installed in, and what type of bulbs they replaced. It also asks for wattage information of replaced bulbs. The document references the Nova Scotia Power Down (PD) program.
b is ugly 15. (Bulb is too heavy) 16. (Bulb contains mercury) 17. (Other [Specify _]) 18. Don‘t know NP. NON-PARTICIPANTS [ASK ONLY NON-PARTICIPANTS] NP1a. [IF PB2b2a 0 haven‘t purchased CFLs in past year}] Have you ever purchased a compac...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), including reasons for not purchasing them and reasons for purchasing them. It also references the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program and includes a section labeled 'NMR'.
1. (Bulb is too bright) 2. (Bulb is not bright enough) 3. Don‘t like the overall quality of the light 4. Don‘t like the color of the light—it is too [SPECIFY: _]) Function/Performance 5. (Delay in light coming on) 6. (Interference with rad...
AI summary The document outlines customer feedback on the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on issues with compact fluorescent bulbs including brightness, quality, energy savings, and compatibility with fixtures. It also asks about future purchasing intentions and potential incentives to increase CFL adoption.
ers 4 Indoor Light Timers 5 Heavy Duty Pool or Outdoor Timers 6 Electronic Baseboard Thermostats 7 ENERGY STAR Refrigerators 8 ENERGY STAR Clothes washers Q2c. FOR ANY PRODUCT WHERE Q2a=1 (sold in 2010) and Q2b=2 (not rebated by Power Down...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions aimed at evaluating the participation and impact of the Power Down program on the sale of energy-efficient products, including light fixtures and appliances, in 2010. It seeks to understand why certain products were not rebated and how sales changed before, during, and after the program's promotion period.
Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q4. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED FIXTURES ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]: You...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of sales of rebated fixtures during different time periods and the impact of the program on those sales. It includes questions about the attribution of increased sales to the program's promotion and rebates.
e program discounts, you would have only sold [100 - (% FROM Q10B 100)] dimmer switches that week without the program discounts? IF RESPONSE IS ≠ YES THEN CLARIFY RESPONSE TO Q10B Q11A. During the October-November promotion period, besides...
AI summary The text consists of a series of questions related to the Power Down program's impact on dimmer switch sales, including inquiries about rebate offerings and their perceived importance to customer purchasing decisions during a specific promotion period.
ov Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q14. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED POWER BARS ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of power bar sales attributed to the rebate program during different time periods. It includes questions about the impact of the program on sales during October-November 2010 compared to earlier periods.
Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q19. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED INDOOR LIGHT TIMERS ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (C...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of sales of rebated indoor light timers during different time periods, specifically comparing October-November 2010 with earlier periods to assess the impact of the rebate program.
that the percentage sales of indoor NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B37 light timers that qualified for the Power Down rebate was higher after the Power Down program period in December 2010 than they were before Power D...
AI summary The text evaluates the impact of the Power Down program on the sales of indoor light timers, asking retailers to estimate the percentage increase in sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects are expected to last. It also inquires about the effect of the $3 rebate on sales during the October-November promotion.
m promotion and rebates? % NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B43 C. [IF % SALES OF REBATED ELECTRONIC BASEBOARD THERMOSTATS ARE HIGHER IN DEC. 2010 (COL. C) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]: You just indicated that the per...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the impact of rebates on the sales of electronic baseboard thermostats. It asks retailers to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects of the promotion are expected to last.
6. Provincial Government $ 7. City/Town/Municipality $ 8. Other $ 98. Refused 99. Don‘t know Q32. During the October-November program promotion period, how important would you say the rebate from the Power Down Program was to customers‘ de...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer perceptions of the Power Down Program's rebate importance during the October-November promotion period and includes follow-up questions about ENERGY STAR refrigerator sales before, during, and after the promotion.
sales, roughly what percent of all the refrigerators that your store sold in October and November OF 2009 were ENERGY STAR refrigerators that were later rebated by the Power Down program? [IF RESPONDENT DOES NOT KNOW, ASK THEM FOR THEIR BE...
AI summary The question asks about the percentage of ENERGY STAR refrigerators sold in October and November 2009 that were later rebated by the Power Down program. The respondent is asked to provide an estimate or a range if they cannot provide an exact figure.
Dec 2010 Oct-Nov 2009 2010 2010 Percent Rebated % % % % Q34. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] A. [IF % SALES OF REBATED REFRIGERATORS ARE HIGHER IN OCT-NOV 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (CO...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the percentage of sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators that qualified for rebates during different time periods. It asks respondents to attribute increases in sales during the program period to the promotion and rebates.
cated that the percentage sales of ENERGY NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B46 STAR refrigerators that qualified for the Power Down rebate was higher after the Power Down program period in December 2010 than they were be...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the impact of rebates on ENERGY STAR refrigerator sales. It asks retailers to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the program and how long the follow-on effects might last.
Down Program was to customers‘ decisions to purchase the ENERGY STAR refrigerators? Please give your response on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is not at all important and 5 is extremely important. NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program...
AI summary The text is part of an evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the sales of ENERGY STAR clothes washers before, during, and after the program's promotion period, and the impact of rebates on customer purchasing decisions.
ASK THEM FOR THEIR BEST GUESS. IF THEY CANNOT PROVIDE A SINGLE BEST GUESS, ASK THEM FOR AN APPROXIMATE RANGE. TRY, AS FAR AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE, TO AVOID A DON‘T KNOW RESPONSE] A. B. C. D. CLOTHES WASHERS Jan-Sept. 2010 Oct-Nov Dec 2010 O...
AI summary The text presents survey questions regarding the impact of the Power Down rebate program on the sales of ENERGY STAR clothes washers during different time periods, asking respondents to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributable to the program.
n and rebates? % C. [IF % SALES OF REBATED CLOTHES WASHER ARE HIGHER IN DEC. 2010 (COL. C) THAN IN JAN-SEPT. 2010 (COL A)]: You just indicated that the percentage sales of ENERGY NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B49 STAR...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on the impact of rebates on the sales of ENERGY STAR clothes washers. It asks retailers to estimate the percentage increase in sales attributed to the program and the duration of any follow-on effects.
during the October-November promotion period if the $XXX Power Down program rebate had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; [998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] C. I want to make sure I understand you correctly when y...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question regarding the impact of the Power Down program rebate on the sales of ENERGY STAR clothes washers, including hypothetical scenarios and follow-up questions about other rebates offered during the same period.
6. Provincial Government $ 7. City/Town/Municipality $ 8. Other $ 98. Refused 99. Don‘t know Q42. During the October-November program promotion period, how important would you say the rebate from the Power Down Program was to customers‘ de...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Power Down Program, specifically focusing on the importance of rebates and overall satisfaction. It also asks for reasons for dissatisfaction, such as rebate size, paperwork, and program coverage.
9. Don‘t know / Refused NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B55 I4. Is there someone else at this store who would be familiar with the stocking patterns or sales trends for the appliances that you sell? BACKGROUND 1. What i...
AI summary The document is a questionnaire aimed at evaluating the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program. It asks retailers about their participation, product sales, and awareness of the program. The focus is on understanding appliance sales trends and rebate application during the program period.
st heard about Power Down program? [If felt excluded] What actions, if any, did you take to become involved in the program? 6. Did you have any concerns about participating in the program? NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Pag...
AI summary The text is a series of survey questions aimed at evaluating the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program, focusing on participant concerns, reasons for participation, barriers to involvement, and the program's impact on sales and store practices.
r store? 12. Did you make any changes to your advertising and promotions for these appliances? (PROBE: media advertising (flyers, newspaper ads, radio, tv), in-store signage, shelf talkers) SALES SPECIFIC QUESTIONS APPLIANCES ENERGY STAR R...
AI summary The text includes questions about advertising changes for appliances and sales data on ENERGY STAR refrigerators during and before the Power Down program promotion. It also references a table with data from the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program evaluation.
ct-Dec Oct-Dec 2009 2010 Percent Rebated % % % Q34. [RECORD PERCENTAGE _%; 998 Refused; 999 Don't know/Not sure/Can‘t remember] E. [IF % SALES OF REBATED REFRIGERATORS ARE HIGHER IN NOV-DEC 2010 (COL. B) THAN IN JAN-OCT. 2010 (COL A)]: You...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about the impact of the Power Down rebate program on the sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators during the November-December 2010 period. It asks respondents to estimate the percentage of increased sales attributed to the rebate and whether they believe sales would have been lower, higher, or the same without the rebate.
period, besides the Power Down program rebates, were there any other rebates provided on ENERGY STAR clothes washers? 3. Yes 4. No 8. Refused 9. Don‘t know Q41B. [IF Q41A=YES]: Who offered the rebates and what was the value of the rebates?...
AI summary The text includes questions about rebates for ENERGY STAR clothes washers, specifically asking if there were other rebates besides the Power Down program and who offered them. It also asks about the importance of the Power Down Program rebate in influencing customer purchases. The text references the Power Down Program and mentions NMR as an entity involved.
Down program or the available rebates in any way? [Probe: flyers, newspaper ads, radio, tv, circulars, posters, in-store signage, shelf-talkers, direct mail, etc.] a. Why or why not? 14. During the past year that is between January and Oct...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions aimed at understanding how retailers promoted and processed rebates under the Power Down program, including media used, frequency of advertising, and rebate presentation methods to customers.
to fill-out a form to receive the rebate after the purchase? Now, I‘d like to ask you a few questions about how you processed and tracked the rebates/incentives as part of the program. 17. How did you track the rebates/incentives? [Excel s...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at evaluating the implementation and tracking of rebates/incentives under the Power Down program, as well as overall and specific satisfaction levels with the program. It focuses on the process of submitting paperwork and receiving rebates, and gauges participant satisfaction.
rier affecting customer participation? Any others? 25. Do you have any recommendations for improving the Power Down program? NMR Evaluation of 2010 NSPI Power Down Program Page B63 26. Approximately how many full-time equivalent workers ar...
AI summary The document includes questions about improving the Power Down program and details an evaluation of the 2010 NSPI Power Down Program and appliance retirement and replacement programs conducted by NMR Group, Inc. for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
50-2 Howard Street, Somerville, MA 02144 Phone: (617) 284-6230 Fax: (617) 284-6239 www.nmrgroupinc.com Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs. It likely assesses the effectiveness, impact, and outcomes of these initiatives aimed at retiring old appliances and replacing them with more energy-efficient models.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM ENERGY AND DEMAND SAVINGS ..................................................................... I TABLE 3-1: CALIFORNIA ARP LAB-TO-ON-SITE DIFFERENCES FOR “COOL” CLIMATE ZONES .....................................
AI summary The text lists various tables related to energy and demand savings, appliance consumption estimates, and energy efficiency program evaluations. These tables provide detailed data on appliance retirement programs, energy consumption, and savings calculations.
MPTION ........................... 21 TABLE 3-14: DEHUMIDIFIER UEC ESTIMATES ............................................................................................. 22 TABLE 3-15: TOTAL PROGRAM SAVINGS—DEHUMIDIFIERS ....................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to energy efficiency programs, including dehumidifier and refrigerator replacement initiatives, with data on energy consumption, savings, and free-ridership rates. These tables provide detailed metrics on program performance and participant engagement.
NMR TABLE 4-9: RESPONDENTS’ ABILITY TO BEAR THE FULL COST OF RECYCLING ........................... 40 TABLE 4-10: AMOUNT WILLING TO PAY TO REMOVE APPLIANCE ...................................................... 40 TABLE 4-11: INFLUENCE OF...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables analyzing respondents' willingness to pay for appliance recycling, the influence of incentives and program information on participation decisions, and the disposal methods and conditions of removed appliances.
vel energy and demand savings estimates can be found in Table 1. For the 2010 program year, the generator-level impacts were estimated at 2,286 MWh of energy savings and 476.4 kW of demand savings.1 Table 1: 2010 Program Energy and Demand...
AI summary The text provides energy and demand savings estimates for the 2010 program year, including data on appliance retirement and replacement programs. It details gross and net savings at the generator level, with specific figures for different appliance types.
raints and the level of marketing and outreach also was significantly reduced for the second phase. These factors combined contribute to lower participation levels in the second phase of the program. Appliance Replacement The Appliance Rep...
AI summary The Appliance Replacement Program faced challenges in engaging the multi-family market due to limited outreach and synchronization issues with the sector's planning cycle. Despite these difficulties, the program offers significant energy savings potential, and NMR recommends continuing the initiative to establish a foothold in the multi-family sector.
f the Appliance Replacement Program, they also encompass NMR‘s experience in the multi-family sector from evaluations as well as program planning activities in other jurisdictions. Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation ARR-F1...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program highlights that participants were motivated by a combination of removal services and incentives, such as rebates and discounted prices. The participant's decision to replace refrigerators varied based on who was responsible for the electric bill, with cost savings and appliance age being key factors.
a Any future program should explore the following pilot, it had a limited target for the number of refrigerators to be potential opportunities in the multi-family sector: replaced. Program promotions consisted solely of cold calls to Aff...
AI summary The document discusses the challenges of engaging the multi-family sector in energy efficiency programs, highlighting limited outreach and split incentives as barriers. It suggests targeting affordable housing property owners and bundling incentives to improve participation and address non-energy benefits of energy efficiency.
energy benefits of improving the energy efficiency of the properties such as increased tenant comfort, higher tenant satisfaction, and reduced tenant turnover. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs Page 1 2 Pro...
AI summary The text discusses the energy benefits of improving property energy efficiency, such as increased tenant comfort and satisfaction, and reduced tenant turnover. It also mentions the Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs and a Program Description and Data Tracking section.
ck-up service (Recycler). Worked with the Appliance Retirement program component to pick up the old appliances from single family homes in Nova Scotia and transport them to the recycler. Retailer. Worked with the Appliance Replacement pr...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement and Replacement (ARR) program in Nova Scotia aimed to remove inefficient appliances from single-family homes and multi-residential buildings, promoting energy efficiency and environmental benefits. It involved recycling, education, and the replacement of refrigerators with energy-efficient models, implemented between June and November 2010.
, local recycler and shipping companies were identified, incentive levels were determined, and a marketing communication plan was developed. The program was implemented between June and November 2010. 2.2.1 Appliance Retirement Program The...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement program was a pilot initiative aimed at removing inefficient appliances from the grid through recruitment of drivers, marketing outreach, and rebate processing. The program was implemented between June and November 2010 with the goal of promoting recycling and market transformation.
Program Assumptions Sufficient marketing and outreach. Marketing and outreach activities are sufficient to recruit adequate numbers of participants. Sufficient program delivery staff. The program hires companies with sufficient numbers...
AI summary The text outlines program assumptions, barriers, and short-term outcomes related to appliance recycling. It highlights the importance of marketing, staff capacity, and accessibility, while noting challenges such as customer reluctance and inaccessibility. Short-term outcomes include awareness, appliance pickup, and energy savings through recycling.
appliances in the market. Energy savings are achieved when old appliances are removed from the home and fewer inefficient products are in the market. Old appliances recycled. Most of the materials in the old appliances are recycled. NMR...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs highlights outcomes such as sustained energy savings, bill reductions, environmental benefits from recycling, and participant incentives. It also discusses long-term outcomes like increased customer engagement with DSM programs and reduced emissions.
Appliance Retirement Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs Page 6
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs, focusing on the logic model developed by NMR. It outlines the structure and goals of the program aimed at retiring inefficient appliances and replacing them with more energy-efficient alternatives.
2.2.3 Appliance Replacement Program Theory The Appliance Replacement program component was a pilot with primarily a Resource Acquisition objective of removing inefficient refrigerators from the grid and replacing them with energy efficient...
AI summary The Appliance Replacement Program aims to remove inefficient refrigerators from the grid and replace them with energy-efficient models, primarily through vendor contracts, marketing outreach, and rebate processing. The program also seeks to shift market behaviors and attitudes toward energy efficiency and proper recycling practices.
ords/building management are sufficient generate interest for the program. Prospective customers have available budget. The prospective customers have the budget available to purchase multiple refrigerators through the program. Vendor...
AI summary The document outlines the conditions required for the success of an appliance retirement and replacement program, including customer budget availability, vendor stock levels, delivery capabilities, and staff skills. It is part of an evaluation of 2010 programs conducted by NMR.
Transfer of understanding. Multi-residential unit owners will remember the energy and bill savings they realized from participating in the program and consider energy efficient options when making decisions to purchase other energy using...
AI summary The document outlines program barriers, short-term and mid-term outcomes of an energy efficiency initiative targeting multi-residential units. It highlights challenges such as program timing and staff capacity, and discusses benefits like energy savings, bill reductions, and environmental improvements from replacing inefficient appliances.
eading to sustained energy savings and a reduction in energy costs. Environmental benefits. Removed appliances are recycled instead of land-filled while toxins are blocked from entering the environment. Participants receive rebates. Pa...
AI summary The document discusses the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs, highlighting energy savings, environmental benefits from recycling, and participant rebates. It also outlines long-term outcomes such as customer engagement with other DSM programs and emission reductions.
Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs Page 10 3 Impact Evaluation 3.1 Methodology for Refrigerators and Freezers This section describes the methodology and calculations used by NMR to calcul...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used by NMR to calculate energy savings from the Appliance Retirement and Replacement program for refrigerators and freezers, including the use of AHAM data, adjustments for device degradation and field performance, and the calculation of adjusted gross savings.
pact the appliance‘s energy consumption. We weighted the lab-to-on-site ratios by sample size to calculate a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.82 (Table 3-1). The equation below displays this calculation. Table 3-1: California ARP Lab-to-On-site...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of an appliance replacement program, focusing on the lab-to-on-site energy consumption differences for refrigerators in cool climate zones. A weighted lab-to-on-site factor of 0.79 was calculated based on sample sizes from California results, which were used to assess the effectiveness of the program in a Canadian context.
3.1.2 Degradation Factor A number of refrigerator metering studies have found that refrigerators and/or freezers degrade over time, in turn increasing their annual energy consumption. The NMR team reviewed three reports to determine what d...
AI summary The document discusses the degradation factor of refrigerators over time, referencing studies conducted in New York City and applying a 1.37% annual degradation rate to both refrigerators and freezers in Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. This rate was selected based on in situ metering data from multifamily buildings in New York, which has a climate similar to Nova Scotia.
ppliance Retirement & Replacement Programs Page 15 Table 3-4 shows the distribution of participants by category. Most participants retired secondary appliances. Table 3-4: Participant Categories Participant Categories Refrigerators Freezer...
AI summary The document discusses the distribution of participants in appliance retirement programs, focusing on the replacement of secondary appliances. It outlines the calculation of unit energy consumption (UEC) for retired refrigerators and freezers using AHAM data and a degradation rate. The final UEC estimates are lower than the program's current assumptions.
tor we developed final UEC estimates of 1,252 kWh for refrigerators and 979 kWh for freezers. The UEC for both refrigerators and freezers were lower than the program‘s current assumptions (Table 3-5). Table 3-5: Comparison of UEC Estimates...
AI summary The document presents updated unit energy consumption (UEC) estimates for refrigerators and freezers, showing lower values than current program assumptions. A partial use factor was developed to adjust UEC estimates, reflecting that not all appliances are used year-round. AHAM provided historical data on appliance efficiency, and a degradation value was applied to freezers based on refrigerator studies.
Replacement Equipment According to the participant survey, of the participants who had refrigerators retired by the program, 42% had a primary refrigerator retired through the program, 17% had a secondary refrigerator retired through the p...
AI summary The evaluation of the appliance retirement program considers the replacement of retired refrigerators and freezers, using energy consumption estimates from AHAM for new and used equipment. It assumes that used appliances have lower energy efficiency and applies a lab-to-on-site factor to estimate annual energy consumption for replacement equipment.
ould expect, the partial use factor was higher for equipment that was replaced than equipment that was not replaced. Most of the replacement refrigerators (93%) and freezers (86%) were new appliances. Table 3-9: Partial Use Factors and Rep...
AI summary The text discusses the adjustment of UECs (unit energy consumption) based on partial use factors and replacement equipment, using data from Table 3-9. It highlights that replaced appliances had higher partial use factors and that most replacements were new appliances. Adjustments were applied to other UECs as well, with results shown in Table 3-10.
and freezers at 3,364 MWh and 1,948 MWh respectively. Our evaluated savings estimates represented a 42% decrease from the tracking database estimates for refrigerators and a 37% decrease for freezers. Table 3-11: Refrigerator and Freezer S...
AI summary The text provides evaluated savings estimates for refrigerators and freezers, showing a 42% decrease from tracking database estimates for refrigerators and a 37% decrease for freezers. Table 3-11 details the number of units, program proportion, savings per unit, and total savings in MWh/year for both categories.
868 833 776 557 705 (kWh/year) Total savings (MWh/year) 853.9 331.5 763.2 391.6 495.2 3.2.3 Dehumidifiers The program‘s tracking database currently assumes that all dehumidifiers retired through the program are ultimately replaced by ENERG...
AI summary The text discusses the energy consumption of conventional and ENERGY STAR qualified dehumidifiers based on studies by the Ontario Power Authority and PA Consulting. It outlines assumptions and estimates for annual energy use, highlighting differences between the two types of dehumidifiers.
er Eff: Dehumidifier efficiency (liters/kWh) Using this equation and the values in Table 3-12, NMR developed an annual energy consumption of 735 kWh for conventional dehumidifiers. Table 3-12: Conventional Dehumidifier—Annual Energy Cons...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of annual energy consumption for conventional and ENERGY STAR qualified dehumidifiers, using data from Table 3-12 and applying the same methodology to estimate consumption for ENERGY STAR models, resulting in 627 kWh annually.
Source: DSM Administrator Applying the same methodology displayed in Table 3-12, we developed an annual energy consumption estimate of 627 kWh for ENERGY STAR qualified dehumidifiers. (Table 3-13) Table 3-13: ENERGY STAR Dehumidifier—Annua...
AI summary The document provides an annual energy consumption estimate of 627 kWh for ENERGY STAR qualified dehumidifiers, based on a methodology outlined in Table 3-12. However, the evaluated UEC estimates for both conventional and ENERGY STAR qualified dehumidifiers were significantly lower than those listed in the tracking spreadsheet (Table 3-14).
four appliances retired through the program. Evaluated savings were lower than the tracked savings for all measures except room air conditioners—the program did not calculate savings for these units. Table 3-16: Program Savings by Measure...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs found that evaluated savings were significantly lower than tracked savings, with overall gross program savings estimated at 2,911 MWh at the meter and 3,256 MWh at the generator—40% below tracked savings estimates.
ator Refrigerator Number of units 305 305 Annual energy consumption (kWh/year) 950 363 22 Per Program Development Working Group on January 26, 2010. 23 All replacement refrigerators were ENERGY STAR qualified. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Applia...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from a refrigerator replacement program, highlighting that replacing 305 units with ENERGY STAR qualified models resulted in 179 MWh savings at the meter and 200 MWh at the generator, after applying a line loss factor of 1.1188.
Savings—Replacement Program Total Savings Meter Generator Energy Savings (MWh) 179 200 3.3.2 Evaluated Program Impacts Based on the program‘s tracking database, NMR determined that the program was replacing retired equipment with two diffe...
AI summary The Savings—Replacement Program evaluated the energy savings from replacing old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR qualified models. The program's energy consumption estimates were significantly lower than those from other studies due to differences in the age and type of refrigerators replaced.
ith an average manufacture year of 1993. The evaluations referenced above included secondary refrigerators and often included refrigerators much older than those retired in the replacement program. 24 The two models of refrigerators being...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 appliance retirement and replacement programs discusses the energy consumption of retired and replacement refrigerators. The retired refrigerators had an average annual energy consumption of 716 kWh, while the replacement models consumed 279 kWh annually. The program resulted in total energy savings of 134 MWh at the meter and 150 MWh at the generator, representing a 25% decrease compared to tracked savings estimates.
27% 7% NFR (non-free-riders) 57 93 PFR (possible free-riders) 14 0 3.5.2 Appliance Replacement Component NMR was able to conduct only one in-depth interview with a participant in the Appliance Replacement program component. NMR determined...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs highlights that free ridership could not be estimated for the Appliance Replacement component due to limited interview data. Net savings for the 2010 program were estimated at 2,286 MWh of energy and 476.4 kW of demand savings, based on original population tracking and participant survey data.
ngs and do not account for any potential program free ridership. For the 2010 program year, the generator-level impacts were estimated at 2,286 MWh of energy savings and 476.4 kW of demand savings. Table 3-27: 2010 Final Energy and Demand...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Programs, highlighting energy and demand savings. Generator-level impacts were estimated at 2,286 MWh of energy savings and 476.4 kW of demand savings. The net-to-gross ratio varies across different appliance categories.
their appliance cited by the refrigerator group (28%) was that they had bought a new refrigerator; the single largest reason cited by the freezer (36%) and dehumidifier (33%) groups was the incentive.
AI summary The text discusses reasons why consumers replaced appliances, noting that 28% of refrigerator owners cited purchasing a new unit, while 36% of freezer and 33% of dehumidifier owners cited incentives as the main reason.
Other 8% Don‘t know/Refused 3% 4.5.2 Participant Perspectives – Appliance Replacement The Appliance Replacement participant interviewed said that, while she did not replace all of her properties‘ refrigerators, she had targeted those refri...
AI summary The participant in the Appliance Replacement program replaced refrigerators in properties where tenants were responsible for electric bills due to their age and in others to take advantage of utility bill savings. Factors such as rebate, refrigerator price, and removal and recycling services influenced her decision to participate.
nd only 32% rated this program aspect as extremely influential. Within the dehumidifier group, 67% of respondents said the $10 incentive had been extremely influential to their participation decision. Table 4-12: Influence of Incentive on...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of incentive amounts and program information on participation in energy efficiency programs. Respondents in the dehumidifier group found the $10 incentive extremely influential, while refrigerator and freezer groups also showed significant influence from program information and advice, though some respondents in the dehumidifier group were unsure or refused to answer.
one (―extremely dissatisfied‖) to five (―extremely satisfied‖). About three-fourths (74%) were satisfied and nearly one-half (48%) were extremely satisfied with their electricity savings. (Table 4-37) Table 4-37: Satisfaction with Electric...
AI summary A participant in the Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program expressed mixed satisfaction with the program, highlighting issues with payment methods and rebate processing times, despite being happy with the new refrigerators and their price.
nergy usage or energy efficiency. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program Page A1 Appendix A Interview Guides and Questionnaire Participant Survey 2009-10 NSPI Appliance Retirement Program DRAFT 8-11-10 SCREENING...
AI summary The document is a participant survey used to evaluate the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program by Nova Scotia Power. It aims to gather customer feedback to improve the program, ensuring responses are confidential and anonymous.
? 1. $0—Would not pay any amount 2. [RECORD DOLLARS $1 to $999] $ _ 98. (Don‘t know) [PROBE: ‗CAN YOU GIVE AN APPROXIMATE ESTIMATE OF HOW MUCH YOU WOULD PAY?‘] 99. (Refused) NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program...
AI summary The document includes survey questions related to the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program, focusing on freezer replacement, including whether participants received a new or used freezer, where they obtained it, and whether it has an ENERGY STAR label. It also asks about the number of freezers currently in use.
efused) DHE2. Was the replacement dehumidifier new or used when you started using it as the replacement dehumidifier? 1. New 2. Used 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Refused) DHE3. Where did you get the replacement dehumidifier? [DON‘T READ] 1. (Sear...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about dehumidifier replacement and usage, including whether the replacement dehumidifier was new or used, where it was obtained, and whether it has the ENERGY STAR label. It also includes questions about the age and number of dehumidifiers currently in use.
0 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program Page A35 Staff and Contractor Interview Guide ARR, August 2010 Date: Name: Programs responsible for: Introduction: [This interview should take about an hour] Your comments are confidential. By t...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide for staff and contractors involved in the Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program in 2010. It includes questions about program background, implementation successes and challenges, and marketing efforts.
RFR1. Before you heard about the Nova Scotia Power appliance retirement program, had you already considered replacing the refrigerators in your building? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Refused) RFR2. Why did you decide to replace the r...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the Nova Scotia Power appliance retirement program, inquiring about participants' prior considerations, motivations for participation, and hypothetical actions in the absence of the program.
uld you have sold the refrigerators? NMR Evaluation of 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program Page A6 1. Private party, such as a friend or family member 2. Used appliance dealer 3. Sold on an Internet site, such as Craig‘s List 4...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program, focusing on how respondents disposed of old refrigerators and whether financial incentives from Nova Scotia Power influenced their ability to afford new ENERGY STAR refrigerators.
ervices provided for free as no extremely DK influence influential part of the program RF11. If the Nova Scotia Power appliance retirement program had not been available, how much, if anything, would you have been willing to pay someone to...
AI summary The document includes survey questions about the Nova Scotia Power appliance retirement program, asking participants about willingness to pay for appliance removal, energy-saving actions taken, and electricity usage changes. It also includes a page reference to an evaluation of the 2010 Appliance Retirement & Replacement Program.
NMR Group, Inc. 50-2 Howard Street, Somerville, MA 02144 Phone: (617) 284-6230 Fax: (617) 284-6239 www.nmrgroupinc.com Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program
AI summary The document presents an evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program, which aimed to improve energy efficiency in residential homes. It likely includes findings on the program's effectiveness, participant feedback, and recommendations for future improvements.
............................................... 19 3.2 PROGRAM GOALS AND DESIGN................................................................................................... 20 3.2.1 Exit of NRCan.........................................
AI summary The document outlines the structure and goals of a program related to energy efficiency in existing homes, including program responsibilities, communication strategies, and delivery mechanisms. It references the Evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and includes the entity NMR.
........................................................... 21 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, assessing its effectiveness and impact on energy efficiency in residential buildings.
................................................ 1 APPENDIX B INTERVIEW GUIDES ......................................................................................................... 1 Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM ENERGY SAVINGS............
AI summary This document provides an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including tables that detail energy savings, incentives, and free-ridership questions. The evaluation includes tracking database savings, prescriptive measures, and comparisons between sampled and other projects.
ESTIMATES .................................................. 18 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program
AI summary The text refers to an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by NMR, indicating a focus on assessing the program's effectiveness and outcomes.
..... 32 TABLE 3-17: IMPACTS OF THE PROGRAM ................................................................................................ 33 TABLE 3-18: SUGGEST ADDITIONAL UPGRADES ..........................................................
AI summary The text outlines the structure of a document evaluating the 2010 Existing Houses Program, including tables and figures that detail program impacts, suggested improvements, and respondent demographics. The document is associated with NMR, which is identified as Nova Scotia Power.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page I Executive Summary This report presents the results of the 2010 impact and process evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program conducted by NMR Group, Inc. (NMR). NMR c...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, finding that it exceeded its energy and demand savings goals. The evaluation was conducted by NMR Group, Inc. for Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, using interviews and HOT2000 reports to measure program impacts.
MWh of energy savings and 2,174 kW of demand savings. These evaluated program savings substantially exceeded the program‘s goal of 4,930 MWh of energy savings and 1,410 kW of demand savings (Table 1). Table 1: 2010 Program Energy Savings P...
AI summary The 2010 Existing Houses Program achieved significant energy and demand savings, exceeding its targets. The evaluation highlights potential double counting of savings attributed to electric measures funded by Natural Resources Canada and other agencies.
laimed savings. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page II
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on claimed savings and energy efficiency initiatives. It is associated with Nova Scotia Power and Conserve Nova Scotia.
Findings and Recommendations The EnerGuide for Existing Homes program has been somewhat confusing for potential participants since the withdrawal of the rebates from NRCan in March 2010. In March, 2010 NRCan announced that new participants...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Homes (EEH) program exceeded its energy and demand savings goals despite confusion caused by the withdrawal of federal rebates in 2010. However, uncertainty about the program's continuation past March 31, 2011, led to staff layoffs and affected program delivery infrastructure. NMR emphasized the importance of maintaining strong relationships with Delivery Agents to rebuild trust and infrastructure.
ire the DSM Administrator to regain the trust and confidence of Delivery Agents and to re- build the program delivery infrastructure. While an assessment of market potential is beyond the scope of this evaluation, even a cursory review of...
AI summary The document highlights the need for the DSM Administrator to rebuild trust and program delivery infrastructure. It notes that a significant portion of Nova Scotia's housing stock is old and could benefit from energy retrofits, with many homes relying on electric heating systems, suggesting substantial energy savings potential.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page III
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on its effectiveness and outcomes. It provides an overview of the program's goals, implementation, and impact on energy efficiency in residential properties.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page IV Program Design & Delivery (continued) Findings Recommendations EEH-F6. EEH-R6. The EEH program has both resource acquisition and market In order to achieve its market transformation go...
AI summary The EEH program aims to achieve both resource acquisition and market transformation goals. Proper contractor training is essential to ensure energy efficiency measures are installed correctly and to encourage the recommendation of energy-efficient products and services.
to install energy efficient products will be more likely to recommend and offer energy efficient products and services to their clients, both within any future EEH program and outside of the program.
AI summary The text suggests that individuals who install energy-efficient products are more likely to recommend and offer such products and services to their clients, both within and outside of the EEH program.
vities delivery agents said that most people hear about the program such as home shows. through word-of-mouth. Other ways that customers frequently mentioned finding out about the program were though the Internet (14%) and the newspaper (1...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program highlights that most participants learned about the program through word-of-mouth, while others found out via the Internet or newspapers. Many respondents had already considered energy-efficient upgrades before the audit. The program helped reduce energy bills for nearly 57% of participants.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page V Program Marketing and Outreach (continued) Findings Recommendations EEH-F11. EEH-R11. Three out of four 2010 respondents (76%) mentioned at least one The new program marketing materials...
AI summary The 2010 Existing Houses Program evaluation found that 76% of respondents decided not to install recommended measures due to cost, with 46% citing expense as the main barrier. However, 89% of respondents noted improved home comfort, including more even temperatures and fewer drafts.
peratures were more even throughout their homes impact that program upgrades can have on the comfort levels in (71%) and that there were fewer drafts (29%) in their homes. their homes. EEH-F13. EEH-R13. The Measure Effectiveness Index reve...
AI summary The text discusses the effectiveness of various energy efficiency measures in the 2010 program, noting that electronic thermostats and high-efficiency heat pumps were particularly effective, while certain ETS measures were less effective. It also mentions improved comfort and reduced drafts in homes after program upgrades.
heater exposed pipe insulation, high efficiency ductless mini split measures for the 2010 program. heat pumps, and electric water heater tank insulation.
AI summary The text lists specific energy efficiency measures, such as heater exposed pipe insulation, high efficiency ductless mini split heat pumps, and electric water heater tank insulation, which were part of the 2010 program.
Program Performance and Savings Findings Recommendations EEH-F14. EEH-R14. NMR found that the program was double counting savings for a The new program should remove the potential for double counting number of measures. Any of the five hea...
AI summary The document highlights issues with double counting savings in the EEH program, particularly for heat pump measures, solar hot water heaters, and water heater tank insulation. It recommends removing double counting by using prescriptive savings only for measures that do not impact EnerGuide ratings. It also suggests coordination between the new program and any new houses program.
ent savings estimates for every prescriptive The new program should consider coordinating with any new measure that is sponsored by the existing and new houses houses program to maintain consistency with regards to programs. Savings estima...
AI summary The document discusses prescriptive savings estimates for energy efficiency measures in existing and new houses programs. It highlights discrepancies in savings estimates between the two programs and calls for clarity in how these estimates are developed and calculated.
ates. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 1
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It examines the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency in existing residential buildings.
1 Program Description and Data Tracking The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program was primarily administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS) and encouraged homeowners in Nova Scotia to improve the energy efficiency of their houses...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS), aimed to improve energy efficiency in Nova Scotia homes. It initially included federal rebates from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), but these were discontinued in March 2010. The program involves pre-retrofit evaluations, retrofit activities, and post-retrofit evaluations.
ings. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 2 vary depending upon the measures installed. For houses with electricity as its primary heating source, the DSM Administrator pays for all of the provincial government‘s share of t...
AI summary The 2010 Existing Houses Program provides rebates for electricity-related upgrades in homes with electric heating or hot water systems. The DSM Administrator covers provincial government rebates and offers incentives for eligible measures.
individual residences NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 3
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on individual residences and their energy efficiency. It is associated with NMR, which is likely Nova Scotia Power.
1.1 Program Theory Program Background The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program was primarily administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS) and encouraged existing home owners in Nova Scotia to improve the energy efficiency of thei...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS), aimed to improve energy efficiency in existing homes through market transformation and resource acquisition. It involved pre-retrofit evaluations, retrofit activities, and post-retrofit evaluations, with support from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and the DSM Administrator.
ter systems. Energy Evaluators input pre-retrofit information into HOT2000 software and upload the data to NRCan. The Energy Evaluators prepare a pre-retrofit report that includes an initial EnerGuide rating and recommendations for energy...
AI summary The 2010 Existing Houses Program involves pre- and post-retrofit evaluations using HOT2000 software, with Energy Evaluators submitting data to NRCan. Homeowners receive rebates after retrofit activities, and the program assumes sufficient marketing and availability of evaluators.
ost-retrofit evaluation activities. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 4
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on retrofit activities. It is associated with NMR, which is likely involved in the evaluation process.
Skills and equipment. Delivery Agents have the equipment, tools and skills required to complete evaluations of participating homes or they can contract for such services. Understanding of savings. Homeowners will understand the energy...
AI summary The text outlines key aspects of a home energy efficiency program, including the skills and resources required for successful implementation, the expected energy and financial savings for participants, and potential barriers such as lack of awareness, cost concerns, and training needs. It also highlights short-term outcomes like increased participant awareness.
nd equipment. Without such contractor training, the measures might not be installed or the savings opportunity might not be fully realized. Short-Term Outcomes Participants learn the energy efficiency levels of their homes. The pre-retro...
AI summary The text outlines the short-term and mid-term outcomes of an energy efficiency program, focusing on homeowner education, evaluation processes, and the installation of energy-saving measures, leading to energy savings and increased knowledge about energy efficiency.
efficiency among participants. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 5 Confidence in energy savings estimates. Based on their experience with the EEH program, homeowners will have confidence in energy savings estimates for...
AI summary The document outlines the short- and long-term outcomes of the 2010 Existing Houses Program, emphasizing increased confidence in energy savings, higher demand for energy efficiency services, and long-term benefits such as emission reductions and avoidance of new generation plant construction.
0 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 8 Table 2-2: Prescriptive Measures and Tracking Database Savings Values Measures Annual Savings (kWh) Ground source heat pump 12,745 Ductless, mini-split air source heat pump 7,325 Air...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing the annual energy savings in kilowatt-hours (kWh) and demand savings in kilowatts (kW) for various prescriptive measures under the 2010 Existing Houses Program. It includes measures such as heat pumps, solar domestic hot water systems, and insulation, among others.
pacts of the program. These results were matched to the difference in EnerGuide ratings to calculate a value for the relationship between the EnerGuide point differential and the savings differential. 13 There were 156 projects in the trac...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program analyzed the relationship between EnerGuide ratings and energy savings, noting that 156 projects lacked D audit EnerGuide ratings and that participants typically installed 1.26 programmable thermostats per home, often due to the prevalence of electric baseboard heating.
. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 9
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on its effectiveness and impact on energy efficiency in residential properties.
Eleven of the participating projects that were sampled had undergone a fuel switch, most often from heating oil to electric based heat. In all 11 cases, the participating project had converted their primary heating system from a non-electr...
AI summary Eleven projects in the sample had switched from heating oil to electric heat pumps, leading to higher electricity consumption and negative savings. These projects were excluded from the EnerGuide point savings analysis. Five additional projects were excluded due to missing EnerGuide ratings, leaving 71 projects for analysis. The sampled projects showed similar results to the rest of the program in terms of EnerGuide ratings.
ings between the pre- and post-audits was almost the same for the sampled projects (6.0) and the rest of the program‘s projects (6.2). These results suggest that the sampled projects reasonably represent the rest of the program. Table 2-3:...
AI summary The audit results show minimal differences between sampled projects and the rest of the program, indicating that the sampled projects are representative. Key measures like programmable thermostats and insulation show slight variations, but most are not statistically significant. EnerGuide ratings are slightly higher for sampled projects.
428 Total savings—D and E audit difference (kWh) 448,102 Per EnerGuide point savings (kWh) 1,047
AI summary The text presents data related to energy savings from audits, showing a total savings of 448,102 kWh with an average of 1,047 kWh saved per EnerGuide point.
sumption of the model, thus removing any possibility of double counting.18 Water heater pipe wrap insulation could not be modeled in HOT2000 so we assumed prescriptive savings should be applied to that measure as well. 17 HOT2000 is the so...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program, noting that certain energy efficiency measures, such as water heater pipe wrap insulation, could not be modeled in HOT2000. Prescriptive savings were applied to these measures, and it was found that all four measures had no impact on the EnerGuide rating or energy consumption of the model.
the model. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Existing Houses Program Page 11
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes.
2.5 2010 Program Impacts To calculate the impacts of the 2010 existing houses program, the NMR team applied the evaluated EnerGuide point savings value of 1,047 kWh, and the prescriptive savings values for drain water heat recovery measure...
AI summary The 2010 existing houses program's impacts were calculated using EnerGuide point savings values and prescriptive savings for various energy efficiency measures. Adjustments were made based on secondary research and the new houses program's prescriptive values, with special handling for homes that underwent fuel switches.
rain water heat recovery systems, water heater tank wrap insulation, and water heater pipe wrap insulation to reflect our secondary research and the prescriptive values used in the new houses program. Table 2-5: Comparison of Prescriptive...
AI summary The text compares prescriptive savings from various energy efficiency measures, including solar domestic hot water heating systems, drain water heat recovery systems, and insulation measures. The table highlights differences between tracked and evaluated savings, with some measures showing significant discrepancies.
1,516 9,723 10,878 9,571 10,708 Evaluated prescriptive savings only were applied to the 48 participants that underwent a fuel switch 24 The tracking database only calculated savings for 1,312 participants using the EnerGuide point system....
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Existing Houses Program showed that it exceeded its energy savings target by nearly double, achieving 9,571 MWh at the meter and 10,708 MWh at the generator with only 1,516 participating projects, slightly over half of the anticipated number. Demand savings were also higher than expected, reaching 2,557 kW at the meter and 2,861 kW at the generator.
ur initial estimates.26 We found that the total demand savings from all ETS measures was 1,085 kW, resulting in total demand savings of 2,557 kW at the meter and 2,861 kW at the generator. (Table 2-7) Table 2-7: Gross Savings Evaluated Imp...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from the 2010 Existing Houses Program, highlighting total demand savings of 2,557 kW at the meter and 2,861 kW at the generator. The data is based on prescriptive savings values from the program’s tracking data and references the 2010 DSM Plan Targets.
Slightly 25% [IF FR3c = YES] Would you have made slightly, somewhat, or Somewhat 25% FR3ci. significantly fewer energy efficiency upgrades to your home? Significantly 0% Don‘t know 25% Yes 50% Would have made the same amount of energy effi...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents about their likelihood of making energy efficiency upgrades to their homes if a program were not available. The responses are categorized into slightly, somewhat, significantly fewer, and the same amount of upgrades. A 'Stated Intent Score' is calculated as an average of the responses.
made through the program Don‘t know 25% Stated Intent Score = average of FR3a, FR3b, FR3c+ci, and FR3d. Table 2-9: Free-ridership Program Influence Questions Free- Question Question Responses Rider Number Score How influential were the fol...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the influence of various factors in the EnerGuide Existing Houses program, including program incentives, information from energy audits, and contractor services, with responses indicating varying levels of influence on participants' decisions to improve home energy efficiency.
t Check Nova Scotia Power paid $[prompt with actual incentive] for the energy efficient upgrades made to your home. If you had not Yes FR4. received the incentive from Nova Scotia Power, could your budget No N/A have accommodated the full...
AI summary Nova Scotia Power's energy efficiency program is being evaluated to determine the extent to which participants would have installed energy efficiency measures without the program. Respondents are categorized into full free-riders, non-free-riders, and partial free-riders based on their responses to budget and planning questions.
e EEH program. Thus, to the extent feasible, interviews with staff or delivery agents who worked on both programs were combined to avoid having to conduct multiple interviews with the same person. 3.1.2 Participant Survey NMR completed a t...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, including participant interviews and sampling error analysis. NMR conducted 70 interviews with 2010 program participants, and sampling errors were calculated for both 2009 and 2010 surveys.
een withdrawn by NRCan, was necessary for the program to exist. All of the Delivery Agents also observed that a large majority of the public was unaware of the fact that a provincial program existed. 3.3 Program Responsibility and Communic...
AI summary The EEH program's success is hindered by low public awareness, despite efforts by CNS and Delivery Agents to promote it through various channels. Delivery Agents increased marketing efforts after NRCan's withdrawal but faced resource limitations.
ance requirements and data tracking forms; the other indicated that the decrease in overall participation had resulted in participants being more spread out, which increased travel distances and time. 3.4.2 On-Site Visits NMR conducted two...
AI summary The document discusses findings from on-site visits conducted by NMR during the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. The visits highlighted the professionalism of contractor services and the effectiveness of energy audits, with one customer noting a reduction in their electric bill after program measures were installed.
mation and HOT2000 audit reports. NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 23 3.6 Program Awareness and Participation 3.6.1 Program Awareness When asked how they had learned about the program, two-fifths of partici...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program found that word-of-mouth was the primary source of awareness, with 40% of 2010 participants and 48% of 2009 participants learning about the program this way. Other sources included the Internet and newspapers.
tion Community center Don‘t know All of the delivery agents said that customers in their service territory were not aware that, even though NRCan has withdrawn its rebates, the provincial program was still in place. Only one delivery agent...
AI summary Delivery agents reported that customers were largely unaware of the provincial energy efficiency program after NRCan withdrew its rebates. Very few respondents had concerns about participating in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, with most not having any concerns. Barriers to participation included lack of work to do at some homes, apathy, and reluctance to work with the government.
e size 23 70 Yes 9% 7% No 91 93 Respondents were asked about the reasons they had been interested in having their homes evaluated by an Energy Advisor. (Table 3-4) In 2010, the most important reasons mentioned by respondents were that they...
AI summary Respondents were surveyed on their reasons for wanting home energy evaluations. In 2010, the top reasons were saving on energy bills (26%) and already thinking about energy-efficient upgrades (24%), while in 2009, the primary reason was already thinking about energy-efficient upgrades (39%).
was (20%). In contrast, the single most important reason that 2009 respondents mentioned for having their homes evaluated was that they had already been thinking about energy efficient upgrades (39%). Table 3-4: Reasons for Interest in Hav...
AI summary The text discusses reasons why respondents were interested in having their homes evaluated for energy efficiency, with a focus on saving on energy costs and considering energy-efficient upgrades. The data compares responses from 2009 and 2010, highlighting shifts in motivations over time.
test 4 1 No other reasons na 13 na 30 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 25 3.7 Participant Plans & Actions 3.7.1 Prior Plans and Actions Respondents were asked if they had had plans to pursue any of the reco...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program found that only two out of five respondents had prior plans to install energy efficiency measures before engaging with the EEH program, with fewer than one in ten having specific plans for any single measure.
o out of five respondents reported prior plans to install at least of one of the measures. However, fewer than one in ten respondents reported specific plans to install any single measure. (Table 3-5) Table 3-5: Prior Plans to Install Meas...
AI summary The text discusses respondents' prior plans to install energy efficiency measures and their contact with contractors before energy audits. Only a small percentage of respondents had specific plans to install any single measure, and fewer than one in ten had plans to install at least one measure. Additionally, nearly one in three respondents contacted contractors about equipment they later installed as part of the EEH program.
water heating equipment that they later installed as part of the EEH program. Nearly one in three respondents reported having made such contact with a contractor prior to the first audit. (Table 3-6) Table 3-6: Contacted Contractor Prior t...
AI summary The document discusses the EEH program and indicates that nearly one in three respondents had contacted a contractor prior to their first audit, with data provided for the years 2009 and 2010.
now 0% 3% NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 26 3.7.2 Recommendations and Installations through the Program Respondents were asked about the measures they recalled being recommended after the pre-retrofit aud...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program recommended and installed various energy efficiency measures. Programmable electronic thermostats were the most frequently recommended and installed, while other measures like solar domestic water heating and electric thermal storage room units were also commonly installed.
ir heat pump with electric backup (9%). Although electric water heater tank insulation was the second most frequently recommended measure (43%), very few respondents (7%) followed up on installing it.
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures, noting that while electric water heater tank insulation was the second most recommended, only a small percentage of respondents followed through with installation. Heat pumps with electric backup were also mentioned as a recommended measure.
Table 3-7: Recommended and Installed Measures 2009 2010 Recommended Installed Recommended Installed Sample size 23 23 70 70 Electronic thermostats 70% 43% 66% 41% Solar domestic water heating system 30% 13% 26% 11% Electric Thermal Storage...
AI summary The table presents data on recommended and installed energy efficiency measures for 2009 and 2010, including electronic thermostats, solar water heating systems, and heat pumps. The data shows a gap between recommended and installed measures, with some measures having low installation rates.
, electric water heater exposed pipe insulation, high efficiency ductless mini split heat pump, and electric water heater tank insulation had been particularly effective measures for the 2010 program.
AI summary The text highlights the effectiveness of specific energy efficiency measures, including electric water heater exposed pipe insulation, high efficiency ductless mini split heat pump, and electric water heater tank insulation, in the 2010 program.
Table 3-8: Effectiveness of Measures Per Unit Cost Annual per Energy Per Unit kWh of Measure Measure Savings EEH annual Effectiveness Uptake (kWh/yr) Incentive savings Index High efficiency air to air heat pump with 70% 7,208 $1,200 $0.17...
AI summary This table evaluates the effectiveness of various energy efficiency measures, including high-efficiency heat pumps, thermostats, and insulation, based on annual energy savings, incentives, and cost per kWh. The data highlights the performance of these measures in the context of the Energy Efficient Homes (EEH) program.
because they had only demand savings. Estimates from the DSM Administrators consultant in EEH program tracking spreadsheet. There were no installations of drain water recovery with 30% - 41.9% efficiency. NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide f...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program found that 76% of respondents decided not to install at least one recommended measure, with cost being the primary reason (46%). This aligns with findings from the 2009 program and feedback from Delivery Agents about cost being a barrier to participation.
ended measure. This also paralleled remarks by the Delivery Agents who said that the cost of installing the measures was the main reason that people had dropped out of the program after the ―D‖ Audit.
AI summary The discussion highlights that the cost of installing energy efficiency measures was a primary reason for participants dropping out of the program following the ―D‖ Audit, as noted by the Delivery Agents.
Table 3-9: Reasons All Recommended Measures Were Not Installed 2009 2010 Primary Secondary Reasons Primary Secondary Reasons Reason (Multiple Response) Reason (Multiple Response) Sample size 15 15 50 41 Too expensive 33% 7% 46% 17% Don‘t t...
AI summary The table presents reasons why recommended energy efficiency measures were not installed in 2009 and 2010. The primary reasons included high costs, lack of perceived need, and insufficient rebates, with secondary reasons including the need for more research and financial constraints.
No other reasons 47% 63% Don‘t Know 22α Respondents who reported not having installed recommended measures were asked if they had any intentions to install those measures in the future. Only two respondents reported that they were planning...
AI summary The evaluation found that the information from energy audits was the most influential factor in encouraging respondents to install EEH-rebated measures, followed by program incentives. Contractor-provided information was the least influential. Only a small number of respondents who did not install recommended measures planned to do so in the future.
on, advice, or services provided by a contractor was the least influential factor with about two out of five respondents (41%) giving the factor a rating of extremely or very influential. (Table 3-10) Table 3-10: Influence of Various Facto...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of various factors on respondents' decisions to install energy efficiency measures. Program incentives and rebates were the most influential, followed by information from energy audits. Contractors' advice was less influential. In 2010, many respondents installed non-program-recommended measures, such as additional insulation and new windows.
installing additional insulation (67%) and new windows (40%). In 2009, respondents most frequently mentioned installing insulation (55%) followed by new doors (36%) and new windows (27%). (Table 3-11) Table 3-11: Other Installed Upgrades N...
AI summary The text discusses the types of home upgrades installed by program participants in 2009 and 2010, highlighting insulation, windows, and doors as the most common upgrades. The data is presented in Table 3-11, which compares the frequency of these upgrades across the two years.
r rebates under the program NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 30 3.8 Satisfaction and Program Impact 3.8.1 Satisfaction with the Program Respondents exhibited very high satisfaction with the program overall....
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program shows very high overall satisfaction among respondents, with 95% in 2010 and 96% in 2009 expressing satisfaction or very satisfaction. Most respondents were satisfied with aspects such as the initial energy audit, Energy Advisor's performance, and scheduling of audits. A small number of respondents expressed dissatisfaction due to the cost of hiring a contractor for upgrades.
t report and recommendations, and the final energy audit overall. It is important to note that, at the time of the survey, not all respondents had received their final rebate cheques from the program. Table 3-13: Overall Satisfaction with...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program indicates high levels of satisfaction among participants, with 97% expressing satisfaction with the energy-efficient upgrades they received. The report highlights strong satisfaction with aspects such as the first and final energy audits, scheduling, and information provided by Energy Advisors.
2009 2010 Sample size 22 65 Very satisfied / Satisfied 100% 97% Respondents were asked to rate the overall value of the program to themselves as well as to the other occupants of their homes. Based on a scale of one to five, where one is l...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program received high satisfaction ratings, with 91% of respondents rating its value as four or five on a five-point scale. Most participants noted improved comfort and fewer drafts in their homes, though the percentage reporting fewer drafts decreased from 2009 to 2010.
Table 3-16: Change in Comfort Noticed Change in Comfort Levels 2009 2010 Sample size 22 65 Yes 86% 89% No 9 8 Don‘t know 3 Refused 5 2009 2010 (multiple (multiple Changes Noticed response) response) Sample size 19 59 Even temperatures thro...
AI summary The table presents data on changes in comfort levels noticed by participants in 2009 and 2010. The majority of respondents reported noticing a change in comfort, with significant percentages noting improvements in even temperatures and fewer drafts, though some aspects like affordability and convenience showed lower percentages.
2% Other 7%α Don‘t Know 2% NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 33 Nearly three out of five 2010 respondents (57%) reported a decrease in their energy bills since the installation of their upgrades. About one i...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program saw 57% of participants report a decrease in energy bills after installation of upgrades, while 11% saw no change or an increase. There was no significant difference between 2010 and 2009 participants, with over half in both years reporting decreased electric bills and high satisfaction with economic savings.
icipants on the program impacts. In 2010 and 2009 over one-half of all participants reported that their electric bill had decreased and they were very satisfied with the economic savings. (Table 3-17) Table 3-17: Impacts of the Program Tim...
AI summary The program's impacts on participants' electric bills were analyzed in 2009 and 2010. Over half of participants reported a decrease in their bills and expressed high satisfaction with the economic savings. The data shows varying levels of satisfaction and changes in bill amounts over time.
Yes 35% 41% No 57 46 Don‘t know 9 0 Respondents were asked if they had any recommendations for improving the program. About one-half of 2010 participants (54%) offered at least one recommendation, significantly fewer than in 2009 (78%). On...
AI summary Respondents were asked about program improvements, with 54% of 2010 participants offering recommendations, significantly lower than 78% in 2009. Common suggestions included increased rebates, tax deductions, and extending the program. Most respondents (93%) lived in single-family homes with at least three bedrooms.
EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A1 Appendix A Participant Survey NSPI – EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program – Participant Survey Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GOTO INTRODUCTION] 2 No [SAY ―Perhaps you can...
AI summary The text introduces a participant survey for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, conducted by NMR Group on behalf of Nova Scotia Power and Conserve Nova Scotia. It begins with a phone call script to identify and confirm participation in the program.
the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program from Nova Scotia Power and Conserve Nova Scotia. 1. We understand you participated in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses rebate program. Is that correct?
AI summary The text references participation in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses rebate program by Nova Scotia Power and Conserve Nova Scotia, and asks if the individual participated in the program.
1 Yes [CONTINUE] 2 No [PROMPT: ―Are you sure? Someone would have come to your house to evaluate the energy efficiency of your home and sent you a report telling you about upgrades you could make to your home to improve its energy efficienc...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for participants in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses rebate program, aiming to gather feedback to improve the program and other services. It includes prompts for respondents and procedures for handling various responses.
about your experience with participating in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses rebate program. Your opinions are very important to us and will help us improve this program and other services for NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing...
AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted for participants of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses rebate program, focusing on how they learned about the program and their reasons for participating. It includes various methods of learning about the program, such as through Nova Scotia Power, Conserve Nova Scotia, and other channels.
tion and participate in the EnerGuide program. What was the ONE most important reason you were interested in having your home evaluated by an EnerGuide Energy Advisor? [SAME LIST AS IN Q4 below] 4. Were there any other reasons? [DO NOT REA...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participants' motivations for joining the EnerGuide program and their concerns before participation. It explores reasons for interest in home energy evaluations and potential concerns, such as cost, rebate amounts, and the audit process.
ry dissatisfied with your experience with that specific aspect of the program. V.Satisf Satisf Neither Dissat V.Dissat DK/Ref 10a. The First Energy Audit Overall 1 2 3 4 5 9 This was the first audit of your home's energy use that identifie...
AI summary The text presents a survey section related to customer satisfaction with energy audit processes and rebate programs. It includes questions about the first and final energy audits, scheduling, information provided, and rebate satisfaction. The survey aims to gather feedback on the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives.
3 4 5 9 10i. The rebates provided by the program for 1 2 3 4 5 9 electric space and water heating measures 11. [IF Q10a = 4 or 5 or Q10f=4 or 5] You indicated that you were not satisfied with the first and/or final energy audit was that wa...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer dissatisfaction with energy audits and verification of energy efficiency upgrades. It focuses on reasons for dissatisfaction and whether specific electric heating measures were recommended.
lectric space or water heating equipment that may have been recommended by the Energy Advisor for your home. For each one, can you please tell me if that measure was recommended for your home? [1 = YES, RECOMMENDED, 2 = NO, NOT RECOMMENDED...
AI summary The text asks respondents if they implemented any energy efficiency recommendations provided by an Energy Advisor, listing various energy efficiency measures such as heat pumps, thermal storage systems, and insulation. It also references the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program.
. (Don‘t Know) 9. (Refused) NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A6 15. [IF Q14 = 1] Which of the following recommendations have you implemented? [ASK FOR EACH ITEM IN Q13a THRU Q13l = 1] [1 = YES, IMPLEMENTED,...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to indicate which energy efficiency recommendations they have implemented, with specific options related to heating systems, thermal storage, and insulation. It also asks about future installation plans for recommended upgrades.
2: Do you plan to install any of the other recommended upgrades in the future? IF ALL Q0a thru l ≠ 1 OR Q14 = 2, 8, 9: Do you plan to install any of the recommended upgrades in the future? 1. (Yes, plan to implement all of the recommended...
AI summary The text includes a questionnaire asking about future installation plans for recommended energy upgrades, followed by a reference to an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. The questionnaire is part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency and customer programs.
9. (Refused) >SKIP TO Q19 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A7 17. Which of the following recommended upgrades do you plan to install in the future? [ASK FOR EACH ITEM IN Q15a THRU Q15l = 1 AND Q0a thru l≠1]...
AI summary The document presents a survey asking respondents about their plans to install various energy efficiency upgrades, including heat pumps, electric thermal storage systems, and insulation, as well as the timing of these installations.
1. Within the next six months 2. Within seven to twelve months 3. More than a year from now 4. (Don‘t know) 19. [ISA: THIS QUESTION HAS THREE ALTERNATE WORDINGS DEPENDING ON PREVIOUS RESPONSES] [IF Q14 >= 2 AND Q16 >= 3] What is the ONE mo...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer responses regarding the timing of actions and reasons for not installing recommended energy efficiency upgrades, as well as follow-up questions about specific upgrades recommended for their homes.
f electric space or water heating upgrades that may have been recommended by the Energy Advisor for your home. For each one, can you please tell me if that upgrade was recommended for your home? [1 = YES, RECOMMENDED, 2 = NO, NOT RECOMMEND...
AI summary The text asks respondents to indicate whether specific electric space or water heating upgrades recommended by an Energy Advisor for their home were suggested, with options to confirm, deny, or indicate refusal or lack of memory.
j. (High efficiency ductless mini split heat pump) k. (Electric water heater tank insulation) l. (Electric water heater exposed pipe insulation) 22. I am now going to read you a list of electricity related upgrades that, according to our r...
AI summary The text lists various electricity-related home upgrades and asks the respondent to confirm if they were installed. It includes a list of heat pumps, water heater insulation, and other energy-efficient technologies. The document is part of an evaluation of an energy efficiency program.
Q21a thru i = 1 AND Q22a thru i≠1]: NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A9 23. So it seems that there were some recommended upgrades that you decided not to install. What is the ONE most important reason you d...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It asks respondents to identify the most important reason for not installing recommended energy efficiency upgrades and to provide additional reasons for not implementing these measures.
next six months 2. Within seven to twelve months 3. More than a year from now 8. (Don‘t know) 9. (Refused) NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A10 [ASK Q27 IF ANY Q0a thru l=1 or Q22a thru l=1] 27. How satisfi...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer satisfaction with energy efficiency upgrades installed in homes under the EnerGuide program. It asks respondents to rate their satisfaction and identify reasons for dissatisfaction, as well as whether they made additional energy-saving upgrades beyond those recommended by the program.
2 3 NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A11 Section 4 – Free-ridership FR1. Did you have any specific plans to pursue any of the recommended improvements that you have installed BEFORE talking with anyone abou...
AI summary The document asks respondents if they had plans to install any energy efficiency improvements before engaging with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program. Most respondents indicate they planned to install various energy efficiency measures, such as heat pumps and water heater insulation, prior to the program.
water heater tank insulation) 10. (Yes, planned to install water heater exposed pipe insulation) 11. (NO) 12. (Don‘t know) 13. (Refused) FR2. Before your initial energy audit, had you contacted any contractors about any of the electric spa...
AI summary The text contains survey responses and questions related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including participant actions and financial considerations. It asks about energy efficiency upgrades, contractor consultations, and the impact of incentives on budgeting.
e incentive from Nova Scotia Power, could your budget have accommodated the full cost of the energy efficient upgrades including the incentive? 1. Yes 2. No 3. (Don‘t know) FR5. How influential were the following elements to your decision...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the influence of program incentives, energy audits, and contractor services on participants' decisions to install energy efficiency upgrades as part of the EnerGuide Existing Houses program. It also references a conditional skip in the survey based on audit stage and response data.
luation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page A13 [IF IN SAMPLE FILE ‘AUDIT STAGE’ = ‘D’ AND Q22a THRU I ≠1 SKIP TO Q37, OTHERWISE CONTINUE] Section 4 - Impact of measures on comfort level and value of the program to customers...
AI summary This section of the audit evaluates the impact of energy efficiency measures on comfort levels and the perceived value of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program. It asks participants if there have been changes in comfort and how they rate the program's value on a scale from 1 to 5.
VALUE and five is IMMENSE VALUE, how would you rate the overall value of the program? [ENTER VALUE] _ Section 5 - Satisfaction with the effects of measures on their energy bills 34. How long has it been since you installed the energy effic...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to customer satisfaction with energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the perceived value of the program, changes in energy bills after installation of energy-efficient measures, and receptivity to additional upgrades not covered by the program.
ades that were not covered by the program that you would like to have had covered through the program? 1. (Yes) 2. (No) 8. (Don‘t know) 9. (Refused) 38. [IF Q37 = 1] Which energy efficiency upgrades would you like to have covered by the pr...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, asking respondents about energy efficiency upgrades they would like to have covered, recommendations for program improvements, and demographic characteristics of participants. The survey is part of an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide program.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page B1 Appendix B Interview Guides
AI summary This document is an appendix containing interview guides from the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It provides structured questions and topics for interviews related to the program's implementation and impact.
Staff Interview Guide for EnerGuide Existing Houses Date: Name: Programs responsible for: Introduction: [This interview should take about an hour] Your comments are confidential. By the way, if I ask you about areas you don‘t know about, p...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide for the EnerGuide Existing Houses program, focusing on program responsibilities, interactions with stakeholders, and program goals. It includes questions about program structure, communication challenges, and energy savings targets.
of specific areas later in the interview, but from an overall perspective, what would you say are the successes you were able to achieve in planning and implementing the program(s) this year? a. Again at the broadest level, what were the a...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on its successes, challenges, and theoretical framework. It asks about program theory, logic models, and whether the program aims to reduce demand or transform market practices.
formation program, where the focus is on changing practices and building adoption, and ultimately effect changes in NS provincial energy standards? Or is it a combination of the two? Why?
AI summary The text questions whether an energy efficiency program should focus on changing practices and building adoption, aligning with provincial energy standards, or if it should be a combination of both, and seeks the rationale behind the approach.
in and promote the program g. Characteristics of target customers that make them the appropriate target for the program h. Customer energy usage and operational characteristics that will result in the achievement of program goals by the im...
AI summary The text outlines questions related to the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on key program targets, their motivations, barriers to participation, and changes in the program over time.
ll need to be made to the program? 24. Are there any other program issues we have not discussed that you would like to mention? 25. We are planning on conducting interviews with [below] are there any other individuals or groups we should s...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions for an interview guide related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, focusing on program issues, stakeholders, and delivery agents. It also references an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide program.
Houses Delivery Agents Primary Contact NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page B4
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on its delivery agents and primary contact information, specifically referencing Nova Scotia Power (NMR).
Date: Name: Organization: Introduction: [This interview should take about 30 minutes] Your comments are confidential. By the way, if I ask you about areas you don‘t know about, please feel free to tell me and we will move on. For transcrip...
AI summary This document outlines an interview protocol for gathering information about the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It includes questions about organizational responsibilities, training, goals, and stakeholder interactions related to the program.
he program manager at Conserve Nova Scotia? What is the nature of these interactions? Do you have any contacts with Natural Resources Canada, the Federal administrator of the EnerGuide Program? IF YES: How frequently and what is the nature...
AI summary The text asks about the program manager at Conserve Nova Scotia and their interactions with Natural Resources Canada regarding the EnerGuide Program. It also inquires about potential efficiencies from managing both the EnerGuide for New Houses and Existing Houses programs, and the role of the President of DA-4 in managing these programs.
program? To what extend does handling the management and communications for the Existing Houses program impact your other responsibilities as President of [Name of DA-4]?
AI summary The question asks about the extent to which managing and communicating for the Existing Houses program impacts the President of [Name of DA-4]'s other responsibilities.
on to Conserve Nova Scotia? To Nova NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page B6
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on its effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency in residential buildings.
Scotia Power? If not, what data should be captured? Do you think the data is being captured and communicated in the most efficient possible way? IF NO: How could the data capture and communication be improved? 16. [IF NOT MENTIONED ABOVE]...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding data capture, program delivery processes, and challenges faced in implementing energy efficiency programs, particularly focusing on customer engagement, data tracking, and the impact of Nova Scotia Power's involvement.
that can be done to encourage these customers to implement recommended measures? 22. For customers who go on to do the final audit, typically, how soon after the first audit do they implement the measures and how much time after the first...
AI summary The text consists of a series of questions aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on customer behavior, program implementation, vendor practices, and overall program performance.
ng the program delivery process? NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page B7
AI summary The text refers to the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on the program delivery process. The document appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency programs.
Customer Issues 26. In general, how aware and knowledgeable are consumers in your service territory about the program? How important do you think it is to increase consumer awareness levels about the program? Why do you feel this way? What...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at understanding customer awareness, participation, and engagement with a program. It explores how customers learn about the program, outreach efforts, barriers to participation, and the impact of Nova Scotia Power's involvement.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM SAVINGS SUMMARY.............................................................................................. I TABLE 2-1: COMPARISON OF 2009 AND 2010 PROGRAM ACTIVITY .............................................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables summarizing energy savings data from various programs, including comparisons between 2009 and 2010, participant and control group analyses, and savings estimates. These tables provide insights into the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives and their impact on electricity usage.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households Program Page I Executive Summary This report presents the results of the 2010 process and impact evaluation of the residential Low Income Households program (LIH) conducted by NMR Group, Inc. (N...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households Program (LIH) administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS) as the Residential Energy Affordability Program (REAP). The evaluation, conducted by NMR Group, Inc., focused on the program's process and impact, including interviews with staff and contractors and a survey of 62 participants.
ogram Savings Summary Peak Demand (kW) Energy (MWh) Net annual savings at generator 199.2 895.4 Findings and Recommendations The LIH program uses three primary REAP Delivery Agents who implement the program. Each Delivery Agent employs or...
AI summary The LIH program uses REAP Delivery Agents to implement energy efficiency measures. Most participants are satisfied with the program, and energy savings are reported, though the program faced delays in 2010 due to contract execution issues.
ergy efficiency (46%). This evaluation identified opportunities to improve program design, marketing and communications. The major survey findings and recommendations are provided below.
AI summary An evaluation of energy efficiency programs found that 46% of participants reported benefits. The evaluation highlighted opportunities to improve program design, marketing, and communications, with major survey findings and recommendations outlined.
Program Outreach and Marketing (continued) Finding Recommendation LIH-F5. LIH-R5. Participation in the program resulted in 40% of the respondents Prospective participants should be made aware of the reporting a reduction in their energy bi...
AI summary The program has led to significant energy bill reductions, with 40% of participants reporting savings and an average monthly saving of $42. Most participants were satisfied with the savings and comfort improvements. Nearly all would recommend the program, though word-of-mouth was not a common source of awareness.
Behavior Changes and Satisfaction Finding Recommendation LIH-F22. LIH-R22. Three out of five respondents (60%) reported that after receiving Education of low-income consumers on continued energy information from the energy audit, there was...
AI summary A majority of low-income participants in the LIH program reported behavioral changes and increased interest in energy efficiency after receiving energy audit information. Satisfaction with the program was high, but decreased between 2009 and 2010, particularly regarding installed energy conservation measures, presentations, and work quality.
1.1 Program Description The 2010 Low Income Housing (LIH) program was administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS),4 which called it the Residential Energy Affordability Program (REAP); and was funded by CNS, the DSM Administrator, Natural R...
AI summary The 2010 Low Income Housing (LIH) program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS) and known as the Residential Energy Affordability Program (REAP), aimed to assist lower-income homeowners in Nova Scotia with energy efficiency upgrades. The program was funded by CNS, the DSM Administrator, Natural Resources Canada, and ecoNova Scotia. Administrative changes included the addition of an Outreach Agent, the reduction of Delivery Agents, and the use of third-party inspections.
ocation of the REAP funds. The regions were: Western region including the Lunenburg, Queens, Shelburne, Yarmouth, Digby, Annapolis and Kings counties; Central region including the Halifax Regional Municipality and Hants county; North...
AI summary The REAP program funds energy efficiency measures in low-income homes across Nova Scotia, targeting older homes in specific regions. Conserve Nova Scotia will shut down in 2011. The program includes building envelope and water-saving measures, with eligibility restrictions based on heating type and location.
quired due to other upgrades installed by the program. For example, bathroom fans are installed to help reduce moisture levels in homes that are have draft proofing measures installed.
AI summary The text discusses the installation of bathroom fans as part of energy efficiency programs, which are required due to other upgrades like draft proofing measures in homes.
1.1.1 Program Theory Program Background The LIH program is a Resource Acquisition program. As a Resource Acquisition program, LIH‘s primary goal is to increase the energy efficiency levels of low-income customer-owned households in Nova Sc...
AI summary The LIH program aims to increase energy efficiency in low-income households through whole-house upgrades. Scope I and II measures are implemented, with Scope I funded only for electrically heated homes. Outreach agents and community organizations help identify eligible participants, and contractors conduct evaluations and prepare renovation plans.
a detailed renovation plan including photographs of areas of homes requiring upgrades and the proposed costs for each upgrade for those homes considered to have enough potential for energy efficiency upgrades. Once CNS has approved the ren...
AI summary The REAP program involves detailed home renovation plans, contractor implementation, homeowner education, and final EnerGuide evaluations. CNS recruits delivery agents and trains energy evaluators. Referrals come from DCS and SNSMR, and outreach agents conduct province-wide recruitment.
Pre-Retrofit Evaluation. The Delivery Agents contact homeowners, collect signed waivers, and conduct an EnerGuide for Houses evaluation. The Delivery Agents then prepare a detailed renovation plan including photographs of areas of homes...
AI summary The process outlines steps for a home retrofit program, including pre-retrofit evaluations, renovation plan approvals, retrofit activities, educational discussions, verification of installed measures, quality control, and data collection. Program assumptions include the adequacy of outreach sources, delivery agents, and training.
ngs estimates for energy efficiency improvements. Increased awareness of the LIH program in Nova Scotia low-income population. Through word-of-mouth and other channels, awareness of the LIH program and its benefits spreads among the low-...
AI summary The document outlines the outcomes of the Low Income Households (LIH) Program in Nova Scotia, emphasizing increased awareness, receptivity, and contractor participation. Long-term outcomes include sustained energy savings, reduced bills, improved economic well-being, and emission reductions.
e average control group pre- and post-installation usage along with the participant data were used to estimate net savings. Table 2-5 shows the mean savings for the program derived from this analysis. Table 2-5: Comparison of 2009 Net Savi...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households Program by analyzing energy savings using the PRISM method. It compares pre- and post-installation usage and shows net savings across different strata. The results indicate a reduction in electricity consumption, with energy savings associated with the program.
0 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 -1 -2 -3 Y Hat NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households Program Page 15 When heteroscedasticity is present, the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression approach to establishing the relations...
AI summary The text discusses the use of Weighted Least Squares (WLS) regression to evaluate the 2010 Low Income Households Program, estimating average savings of 1,044 kWh/year with a 90% confidence interval of ±220 kWh. The results were not statistically different from those obtained using the PRISM method.
measure verification AMP (electric focus): 968 kWh (Massachusetts), AMP and Low Income 15 and HEAT analysis tool AMP (electric focus): 827 kWh (Rhode Island) Baseload Program (no electric heat) net savings: Pre/post treatment/ compar...
AI summary The document presents energy savings data from various programs, including the AMP and Low Income programs, with specific figures for different regions and programs such as the Baseload Program and Full Cost Program. It also references evaluation reports from multiple sources.
AP%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households Program Page 19 Table 2-10 presents the final estimates of savings for the LIH program based upon the billing analysis results described above. This table utilizes t...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households (LIH) Program, estimating energy and demand savings based on billing analysis. It reports total energy savings of 800.3 MWh at the meter and 895.4 MWh at the generator, with a 30% realization rate compared to the program tracking estimate. Demand savings are estimated at 178 kW at the meter and 199.2 kW at the generator.
In considering what might be driving the low realization rate for this program, we looked at ten HOT2000 reports each from the three 2010 program Delivery Agents. In examining these 30 reports, we found an average space heating consumption...
AI summary The analysis found a significant discrepancy between estimated and actual space heating electricity usage in the LIH program, with billing data showing much lower consumption than reported in HOT2000 and Conserve Nova Scotia reports. This led to the development of a more conservative alternative estimate for program impacts.
tive estimate of impacts for the LIH program. In the interest of producing this alternative estimate conservatively, we used the lower bound of the Conserve Nova Scotia space heating use combined with 17 We used a factor of 1.1188 to calcu...
AI summary This section presents an alternative estimate of the impact of the Low Income Households (LIH) program by using a conservative approach that combines data from Conserve Nova Scotia and billing analysis results. The estimated energy savings are 1,129 MWh and 1,264 MWh for meter and generator respectively, with corresponding demand savings of 251 kW and 281.2 kW.
Meter Generator Energy (MWh) 1,129 1,264 Demand (kW) 251 281.2 In the final analysis, however, the billing data approach was based on actual consumption data for the low income population and thus may be considered more reliable than extra...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households (LIH) program, comparing billing data with survey estimates to assess energy savings. It highlights the use of actual consumption data for low-income households and discusses the process evaluation involving interviews and surveys to ensure cost-effective energy-saving measures are implemented.
3.2 Program Design and Administration The 2010 Low Income Households (LIH) program operated in concert with the Conserve Nova Scotia Residential Energy Affordability Program (REAP) which had overall administrative responsibility for the pr...
AI summary The 2010 Low Income Households (LIH) program, administered through the Residential Energy Affordability Program (REAP), provided energy-efficient upgrades for low-income homes. The program had two scopes: Scope I covered building envelope upgrades with full funding for electrically heated homes, and Scope II included items like CFLs and ENERGY STAR appliances, fully funded regardless of heating source. Three Delivery Agents implemented the program in 2010, with one exiting due to an unsuccessful bid.
ators and freezers. The guidebook is contained as an appendix within the LIH program manual. If the age of the appliance could not be determined from the guidebook, Delivery Agents were expected to consult web- based resources in order to...
AI summary The LIH program manual provides guidance on appliance replacement, but initial lack of information caused challenges for Delivery Agents. Program administrators are considering a design change to separate Scope I and Scope II audits to improve cost effectiveness, though this would require additional visits to homes.
r to perform the Scope I upgrades. The EnerGuide audit would not be performed for homes receiving only Scope II upgrades. While they had heard about the discussions regarding separating Scope I and Scope II audits, at the time of the in-de...
AI summary The document discusses the implementation of the Low Income Households Program, focusing on the roles of Delivery Agents and the challenges related to audit scopes. Delivery Agents are responsible for program coordination, and concerns were raised about the cost of separating Scope I and Scope II audits. The DSM administrator is considering these concerns during program redesign.
3.4 Production of Participant Lists In 2010, the proportion of participants recruited through DCS decreased while the proportion recruited by the Outreach Agents increased. In addition, a third recruitment method was implemented to generat...
AI summary In 2010, the recruitment of participants for energy programs in Nova Scotia saw a shift from DCS to Outreach Agents, with a new method involving SNSMR and CNS identifying eligible households. While the process was generally smooth, there were concerns about insufficient participant names and inconsistent screening, leading to inefficiencies.
suggested customizing the letter to reflect recruitment channel in order to enhance participant recall of the program. The Outreach Agents reported confusion among individuals between the REAP program and EnerGuide Existing Homes program f...
AI summary The REAP program's outreach faced challenges due to confusion with the EnerGuide Existing Homes program after federal rebates were cancelled. Participants primarily joined REAP to save money on electric bills, with a significant increase in this motivation from 2009 to 2010. Outreach methods and participant sources also differed between the two years.
2009 2010 Most Other Reasons for Most Other Reasons for Important Participating Important Participating Motivation (multiple response) Motivation (multiple response) Sample size 55 52 62 56 To save money on 18% 29% 48%β 21% my electric bil...
AI summary The table presents survey results from 2009 and 2010 regarding participants' motivations for joining energy efficiency programs. Key motivations include saving money on electric bills, receiving insulation, and improving energy efficiency, with varying percentages across years.
2009 2010 Sample DK/ Sample DK/ Measures size Yes No Ref size Yes No Ref Building envelope measures 37 95% 5 39 77%β 23 Programmable thermostats 14 93% 7 24 100% Tank wrap for electric hot water 40 70% 30 22 91%β 9 heater Pipe wrap for exp...
AI summary This table shows the participation rates in various energy efficiency measures in 2009 and 2010. Measures such as building envelope improvements, programmable thermostats, and low-flow fixtures are listed with their sample sizes and participation rates. Some measures show high participation, while others have lower rates.
8% 16% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households Program Page 37 When asked if there were any other energy savings actions taken on their own, in addition to the measures installed by the program, more than two-thirds of the 2010 respon...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Low Income Households Program found that 69% of respondents did not take any additional energy-saving actions beyond those installed by the program. Among those who did, weather stripping and door/window replacement were the most common actions, each reported by 11% of respondents.
in satisfaction with the energy conservation measures installed, the energy efficiency presentation, and the quality of the work completed was statistically significant at the 90% confidence interval. Table 4-15: Satisfaction with LI REAP...
AI summary The satisfaction levels with the REAP program and its various aspects decreased from 2009 to 2010, with statistically significant differences at the 90% confidence level for several components such as the energy efficiency presentation, energy conservation measures installed, and the quality of the work completed.
2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households Program Page 40 Nine respondents (15%) stated that they had not recommended the program to a family member or friend. When asked to explain why they had not recommended the program to anyone,...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Low Income Households Program found that 15% of respondents did not recommend the program to others, mainly due to eligibility requirements. Additionally, 11% of respondents did not install recommended energy efficiency measures, with reasons varying among participants.
2009 2010 Sample size 55 62 Yes 4% 11% No 96 87β Don‘t know/Refused 2 Number of Number of Respondents Respondents Measures not installed (multiple response) (multiple response) Sample size 2 7 Incandescent lamp replacement with CFLs 2 Buil...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures installed and not installed by respondents in 2009 and 2010. It includes sample sizes, percentages of respondents who installed or did not install specific measures, and reasons for not installing them.
Table 4-20: Interest in measures not provided by program Interest 2009 2010 Sample size 55 62 Yes 40% 55%β No 56 42 Don‘t know 4 3 2009 2010 Specific Measures (multiple response) (multiple response) Sample size 22 34 Additional windows/env...
AI summary The table presents data on interest in energy efficiency measures not provided by a program in 2009 and 2010. It shows an increase in interest from 40% to 55% over the two years, with specific measures like additional windows and doors showing varying levels of interest.
= Absolute Relative Deviation Uc = Annualized Usage for Potential Control Group Member Up = Annualized Usage for Participant For each participant, the control group pool customers with the smallest absolute relative deviation in the annual...
AI summary The text describes the methodology for selecting a control group in an energy efficiency program, based on annualized usage deviation and temperature normalization using the PRISM algorithm to estimate normalized annual consumption.
s using a representative control group and simple equations. After the normalization of the participant and control group bills (see Temperature Normalization Methodology), the difference between the pre-program and post-program NACs were...
AI summary The text describes the use of a control group and normalization methodology to calculate energy savings from a program. It outlines the use of Equation 6 to determine gross energy savings and Equation 7 to adjust for exogenous influences by comparing pre- and post-program normalized annual consumption (NAC) values.
the estimated mean. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households program Page A8
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households program, focusing on its estimated mean and other relevant data, likely related to energy efficiency or affordability initiatives for low-income households.
n you received from the energy evaluation changed your behavior in terms of how you use energy at home? 1. Yes [ASK Q#17] 2. No 8. Don‘t know 9. Refused 17. [IF Q#16=1] How has your behavior changed? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT ALL RESPONSES] 1....
AI summary The text includes survey questions about changes in energy usage behavior and verification of installed energy efficiency measures in homes. It focuses on assessing the impact of the 2010 Low Income Households program on energy consumption patterns.
NSTALLED, 8=REFUSED, 9=DON'T KNOW) NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households program Page C6 1. Building envelope measures such as: insulation, air sealing, weather stripping, or exterior door installation or replacement (Electric Space...
AI summary This document outlines the evaluation of the 2010 Low Income Households program, detailing energy efficiency measures implemented, including insulation, thermostat installation, and appliance replacements. It also asks about additional energy-saving actions taken by participants beyond the REAP program.
2. No [SKIP TO Q#32] 8. Don‘t know [SKIP TO Q#32] 9. Refused [SKIP TO Q#32] [IF YES TO Q#29] 30. Which measures did you choose not to install in your home? 1. Building envelope measures such as: insulation, air sealing, weather stripping,...
AI summary This section of the document presents a series of questions related to energy efficiency measures that respondents chose not to install in their homes, along with reasons for not installing them. It includes options for various energy efficiency measures and asks respondents to specify the reasons for not implementing them.
E TIME TO RESPOND TO THIS SURVEY.] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households program Page C12
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Low Income Households program, focusing on its effectiveness and impact on low-income households. It discusses the program's goals, implementation, and outcomes, with an emphasis on energy efficiency and affordability.
program? When did it start? When will it end? 6. What are the 2010 energy savings goals for [PROGRAM(s)]? Do you think you will achieve these goals? 7. We‘ll be going into a number of specific areas later in the interview, but from an over...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions related to a program, focusing on its start and end dates, 2010 energy savings goals, and overall successes in planning and implementation. It references the evaluation of the 2010 Low Income Households program.
Staff Interview Guide for LI REAP Delivery Agents Primary Contact Date: Name: Organization: Introduction: [This interview should take about 30 minutes] Your comments are confidential. By the way, if I ask you about areas you don‘t know abo...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for delivery agents involved in the LI REAP Program, focusing on their responsibilities, training, program goals, and business impact. It seeks to gather insights on program effectiveness, training needs, and operational challenges.
main goals of the LI REAP Program? NMR Evaluation of 2010 Low Income Households program Page C15
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Low Income Households program, focusing on its goals and outcomes. It appears to be part of a larger analysis of energy efficiency initiatives targeting low-income households.
ganization‘s effort for the LI REAP Program is spent on fulfilling data tracking requirements? [PROBE IF ISSUE IS NOT BROUGHT UP: What tracking and reporting data do you provide specifically regarding electric measures that are rebated by...
AI summary The text discusses the LI REAP Program, including how much effort is spent on data tracking and reporting for electric measures rebated by Nova Scotia Power. It also outlines the two categories of energy-efficient upgrades under the program—Scope I and Scope II—detailing which upgrades are funded by NSPI and under what conditions.
16. In general, how well do you think the program tracking and reporting process is working? Do you believe all the necessary data is being captured and passed on to Conserve Nova Scotia? To Nova Scotia Power? If not, what data should be c...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions concerning the program tracking and reporting process, data collection efficiency, program delivery timelines, vendor selection, and challenges in program implementation. It focuses on data accuracy, communication, and process improvements.
ularly good about program outreach? How could program outreach be improved? STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES / WRAP-UP 18. What would you say are the greatest strengths of the LI REAP program? And what would you say are the greatest weaknesses? Wh...
AI summary The evaluation focuses on the 2010 New Houses Program, assessing its impact and process. It was conducted by NMR Group, Inc., and submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The report includes findings from the evaluation and recommendations for improvement.
.3 INCREMENTAL ENERGUIDE POINT SAVINGS ....................................................................20 3.4 PROGRAM IMPACTS ..........................................................................................................22...
AI summary The text outlines various sections of an evaluation report, including incremental energy savings, program impacts, validation of energy models, heat pump analysis, free-ridership assessment, and energy savings estimation. These sections are part of a broader process evaluation methodology.
4.1.1 Sampling Error ........................................................................................................ 33 4.2 PROGRAM GOALS AND DESIGN ....................................................................................
AI summary The text outlines various sections of a program evaluation, covering sampling error, program goals, communication strategies, information sources, homeowner involvement, motivations and barriers, participant and staff perspectives, benefits of energy-efficient homes, program incentives, and overall program satisfaction.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM SAVINGS SUMMARY ............................................................................. 2 TABLE 3-1: TRACKING DATABASE SAVINGS—2010 CALENDAR YEAR ..................................... 14 TABLE 3-2: PRESCR...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables summarizing energy efficiency program savings and evaluations from the year 2010. These tables compare various metrics, including baseline home characteristics, electricity savings, and program influence, providing data for analysis and evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives.
TABLE 4-6: MOST IMPORTANT REASON FOR PARTICIPATING ................................................... 38 TABLE 4-7: OTHER REASONS FOR PARTICIPATING ................................................................... 39 TABLE 4-8: CONCERNS...
AI summary The text lists a series of tables related to participant motivations, concerns, and experiences with the New Home (NH) program, including factors influencing participation, comfort and energy bill impacts, and builder awareness of energy efficiency requirements.
................................ 13 NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 1 1 Executive Summary This report presents the results of the process and impact evaluation of the 2010 New Houses (NH) program conducted by NMR Group, Inc. (N...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 New Houses program by NMR Group, Inc. for Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The evaluation highlights changes due to new building codes and organizational shifts, including the transition of the DSM portion to ENSC and impacts from NRCan's withdrawal from the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program.
tion explored issues that included program administration, satisfaction, motivation, barriers to participation and how the rebates incentivized participants to implement energy efficiency measures. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Pa...
AI summary The impact evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program found that it achieved 680 MWh of energy savings and 810 kW of demand savings, falling short of the 2,000 MWh energy savings target but exceeding the 640 kW demand savings target. The evaluation considered free-ridership rates and adjusted calculations accordingly.
Targets Revised Jan 26 2010. Note, however, that the ENH program manual shows 2010 targets of 1,000 new houses and energy savings of 4.37 GWh; the manual did not include any demand savings target. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Pag...
AI summary In 2010, the EnerGuide for New Houses and PerformancePlus (NH) program saw participation driven largely by heat pump incentives, despite increased energy efficiency standards. Free-ridership was high, and the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency is questioned.
mostly a heat pump program. That said, survey respondents reported strong interest in energy efficiency and satisfaction with the program. Specific findings and recommendations are provided below. 2 During 2010, the EnerGuide New Houses pr...
AI summary The text discusses a heat pump program and mentions survey respondents' strong interest in energy efficiency and satisfaction with the program. It also notes the re-launch of the EnerGuide New Houses program as PerformancePlus in 2010.
Program Participation and Incentive Structure Finding Recommendation NH-F1. NH-R1. Implementation of the NH program entailed multiple phases and a Under these circumstances, the program has two choices variety of people were involved in de...
AI summary The NH program's implementation involved multiple phases and stakeholders. With the EnerGuide 83 minimum requirement, many homes could meet it by installing heat pumps, making the program function as a heat pump initiative. The recommendation suggests raising the EnerGuide level to 85 or 90 over time or shifting to direct incentives for specific measures to improve cost-effectiveness and efficiency.
NH-R2. Starting in January 2010, Nova Scotia building code required all new Before designing any future residential new construction homes to have a minimum EnerGuide rating of 80. Builders or energy efficiency programs, the DSM Administra...
AI summary The Nova Scotia building code since 2010 requires new homes to meet an EnerGuide rating of 80. Building inspectors are crucial for enforcing these standards. Marketing for the NH program should continue to emphasize energy cost savings and be expanded through various channels.
ause they wanted a house that would save on emphasize energy cost savings from constructing a house energy costs and bills. through the program. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 5
AI summary The text discusses the motivation behind constructing energy-efficient homes, emphasizing energy cost savings through a program. It references NMR in the context of an evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program.
e program. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 5 Program Marketing (continued) Finding Recommendation NH-F5. NH-R5. Builders were motivated to participate in the NH program because NH program marketing to builders should emphasize...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program highlights that builders were motivated by the opportunity to benchmark energy efficiency and market demand for energy-efficient homes. The report recommends improving marketing materials and emphasizing the value of the EnerGuide label. It also suggests that using an alternative incentive structure could limit these benefits.
Program Administration and Delivery Finding Recommendation NH-F7. NH-R7. The program underwent changes in the past year including changing ENSC should work to provide a cohesive program with its name as well as changes in program requireme...
AI summary The program has undergone changes, including a name change and adjustments to requirements and incentives, leading to confusion among builders regarding support for HOT2000 and the Nova Scotia building code. Builder training sessions were found to lack sufficient detail, and there is a need for improved education and clearer communication about the program's administration.
NH-R10. Delivery Agents reported that reviewing HOT2000 reports was a The NH program should work with NRCan to provide time-consuming process. Program staff observed that NH program additional training to Delivery Agents on reviewing and c...
AI summary Delivery Agents found reviewing HOT2000 reports time-consuming. Program staff suggested the NH program should provide more training and guidance on tracking and adjusting energy savings, particularly differentiating between plug load and building envelope measures.
Program Performance and Savings Finding Recommendation NH-F11. NH-R11. Only one of the four builders reported being satisfied with the The program should work to improve the scheduling and scheduling and timing of the audit. timing of the...
AI summary The findings highlight issues with the scheduling of energy audits, double counting of prescriptive measures in HOT2000, inconsistent modeling of CFLs, and the inability to model water heater pipe wrap insulation. Recommendations include improving audit scheduling, ensuring proper modeling practices, and addressing gaps in HOT2000.
NH-R14. Water heater pipe wrap insulation could not be modeled in HOT2000. It is appropriate to add prescriptive savings for water Drain water heat recovery measures and programmable thermostats heater pipe wrap insulation, thermostats and...
AI summary The text discusses the modeling of energy efficiency measures in the HOT2000 program, the EnerGuide rating requirements for homes in Nova Scotia, and administrative considerations for the NH program. It highlights that some measures, like water heater pipe wrap insulation, cannot be modeled in HOT2000, while others, like programmable thermostats, do not affect energy consumption. The EnerGuide rating of 80 is a baseline for new homes, and program participants can benefit from rebates by increasing their ratings.
2.1 Program Description The NH program was administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS). The DSM Administrator joined the program in 2009 by adding incentives for specific measures. The new independent program administrator, Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The NH program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia and later by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, provides rebates for energy efficiency upgrades in new homes, including heat pumps, thermal storage systems, and water heating improvements. The program involves certified Energy Advisors and Delivery Agents to evaluate and implement upgrades.
r heating systems Electric water heater pipe wrap Aluminum foil or fibreglass electric water heater tank wrap At least 10 energy efficient lights in fixtures 3 Conserve Nova Scotia also provided rebates for other non-electric measure...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures such as electric water heater wraps and lighting, as well as the Conserve Nova Scotia rebate program. It also notes that the R-2000 program is not part of the DSM program and provides details about R-2000 certified homes. The document references NMR and includes a link to an evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program.
2000program.html. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 8 Through the NH program, electrically heated houses receiving a final EnerGuide rating of 85 or higher were eligible for an additional incentive of $300. This increased substan...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program provided incentives for electrically heated homes achieving high EnerGuide ratings. The program was re-launched as PerformancePlus with higher rebates and additional solar incentives. Registration fees were rebated for homes achieving specific EnerGuide ratings before September 7, 2010, but this was discontinued afterward.
houses achieving an EnerGuide rating of 85 or higher qualified for an additional $300 rebate. For homes registered on or after September 7, 2010, the program no longer offers registration fee rebates. 2.1.1 Program Theory Program Backgroun...
AI summary The 2010 New Homes (NH) program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia (CNS), aimed to improve energy efficiency in new homes through Market Transformation and Resource Acquisition strategies. It worked with Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and required participation through registration, construction, and EnerGuide ratings, with rebates tied to EnerGuide ratings.
house construction. Helping them to specify energy efficient construction practices and measures for houses will ensure long-term savings. Marketing and outreach. The program utilizes advertising directed to commercial and private builde...
AI summary The program focuses on promoting energy-efficient home construction through marketing, outreach, registration, and evaluation processes. Builders register house plans, energy advisors model upgrades, and completed homes are audited to ensure energy efficiency measures are implemented.
audit the completed house (including a blower door test) and verify the energy saving measures that were installed. Energy Evaluators input audited data into HOT2000 software and upload information to NRCan. Based on the results, the house...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program involves auditing completed houses with a blower door test, inputting data into HOT2000 software, and assigning an EnerGuide rating. Eligibility for rebates depends on the results, and rebates are processed by CNS for the first owner or builder. The program assumes sufficient outreach to motivate builders, developers, and customers to participate.
Adequate availability of Energy Evaluators. NRCan is able to train a sufficient number of Delivery Agents/Energy Evaluators to model the house plans and audit the completed house. Skills and equipment. Delivery Agents/Energy Evaluators...
AI summary The document discusses program enablers and barriers related to energy efficiency initiatives. Enablers include availability of trained evaluators, proper skills and equipment, and availability of materials. Barriers include lack of awareness, reluctance to change practices, and cost-driven construction.
ge of the program could lead to poor participation by local business associations. Cost-driven construction and competitive markets. Some builders or customers may be interested in building only the most economical house that meets build...
AI summary The text discusses challenges in promoting energy-efficient home construction, including poor participation by local business associations, cost-driven construction, and misplaced incentives that may discourage home builders from investing in energy efficiency.
program incentives (which are sent directly to the home buyers).6 Participants who are building the houses for themselves may be reluctant to make investments in more efficient measures because they may not be confident that the rebates wi...
AI summary The text discusses challenges in implementing energy efficiency programs, such as reluctance among self-building participants to invest in efficient measures due to uncertainty about rebate approval, lack of availability of efficient equipment, inadequate training for builders, and restrictions on marketing homes as energy efficient until certification is complete. It also outlines short-term outcomes, including program awareness and identification of energy-saving opportunities.
outreach efforts. Energy Evaluators identify energy saving opportunities. The reports from the modeling of the house plans that are provided to customers identify energy savings opportunities and help inform participants about what they...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program encourages energy efficiency in new homes through outreach, energy evaluations, and incentives. Builders and developers are motivated to use energy-efficient materials and equipment, and rebates can be transferred to builders to reduce upfront costs for homeowners.
Home owners receive rebates and incentives. Home owners receive rebates for applicable energy efficiency measures from the provincial government and the DSM Administrator. Intermediate Outcomes Energy savings and bill reductions. Energ...
AI summary The text outlines the outcomes of a program aimed at promoting energy efficiency in residential construction. It highlights immediate benefits such as rebates and increased knowledge, intermediate outcomes like energy savings and confidence in efficiency estimates, and long-term goals including standardizing energy-efficient practices and revising building codes.
tock of energy efficient houses across Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia building code is revised. Building code in the province is revised to be consistent with the widespread adoption of the energy efficient building practices. Sustained ener...
AI summary The document outlines the impacts of the 2010 New Houses Program in Nova Scotia, including revised building codes, increased demand for energy-efficient homes, sustained energy savings, and avoidance of new generation plant construction.
NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 14 3 Impact Evaluation 3.1 Methodology The NMR team‘s approach to evaluating the 2010 impacts of the NH program was based on a review of the program records to assess the approach taken by the DS...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program assessed program savings using a sample of homes, updated baseline models, and software comparisons. Tracked savings for 2010 were 1,700 MWh at the meter and 1,900 MWh at the generator, with the latter adjusted using a line loss factor. Free-ridership rates were calculated through a survey of 47 participants.
vings estimates for 2010 were 1,700 MWh at the meter and 1,900 MWh at the generator. (Table 3-1) Savings at the generator were calculated by applying a line loss factor of 1.1188 to the meter savings. Table 3-1: Tracking Database Savings—2...
AI summary The document provides energy savings estimates for the 2010 New Houses Program, with 1,700 MWh savings at the meter and 1,900 MWh at the generator. Savings were calculated using EnerGuide ratings and a line loss factor. The evaluation used HOT2000 software and excluded three homes that had not yet been invoiced.
lculations. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 15 value of 611 kWh per EnerGuide point was applied to the difference in EnerGuide ratings. 11 In addition, the program savings also included a host of prescriptive measures whose sav...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 New Houses Program, calculating energy savings based on EnerGuide ratings and prescriptive measures. Specific measures and their annual savings in kWh are listed in Table 3-2.
of how savings would be calculated for a participating home that received an EnerGuide rating of 80, installed a solar domestic hot water heating system, and installed two programmable thermostats: 11 NMR (2010). Impact and Process Evaluat...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings for homes participating in an energy efficiency program, including the installation of a solar domestic hot water heating system and programmable thermostats. It references evaluations by NMR and the Ontario Power Authority.
.51 of HOT2000. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 17 programmable electronic thermostat installed through the program. The sampled projects also had a significantly higher average EnerGuide rating (83.5) than all other participat...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program found that homes with programmable thermostats had higher EnerGuide ratings, suggesting they may have been larger in size compared to other participating projects.
Table 3-3: Comparison of Sampled Projects vs. Other Projects Measures Sampled Projects Other Projects Sample Size 25 235 13 watt CFL compatible fixtures 72% 55% Programmable electronic thermostat 44% 19% Air source heat pump with electric...
AI summary The table compares the implementation rates of various energy efficiency measures in sampled projects versus other projects. It shows higher adoption rates for measures such as 13 watt CFL compatible fixtures and programmable electronic thermostats in sampled projects.
backup ETS room unit 5% ETS forced air furnace <1% Average EnerGuide rating 83.5 82.4 Indicates results that are significantly different at the 90% confidence interval 16 Larger homes often ―score‖ better than homes that have identical fea...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 New Houses Program shows that larger homes in the sampled projects had slightly higher EnerGuide ratings compared to the rest of the program. This may be due to the larger building components in the 2010 homes, which led to higher annual energy consumption compared to the 2009 baseline homes.
the code upgrade baseline home was 26,605 kWh, while the consumption of the updated baseline home was 33,740 kWh. This represents a difference of 7,135 kWh between the two baseline homes. (Table 3-5) Table 3-5: Comparison of 2010 Baseline...
AI summary The text compares the energy consumption of updated and code upgrade baseline homes in 2010. The updated baseline home consumed 33,740 kWh annually, while the code upgrade baseline home consumed 26,605 kWh, showing a 7,135 kWh difference. The table highlights differences in building components like insulation, windows, and heating systems.
74 80 Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh) 33,740 26,605 20 Nova Scotia Labour and Workforce Development, Nova Scotia Building Code Regulations (Halifax, NS 2009), 112. 21 After adjusting the insulation values and the efficiency of the wat...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency improvements in new homes, including adjustments to insulation values, water heating systems, and EnerGuide ratings. It references the Nova Scotia Building Code Regulations and outlines assumptions made for electric heating systems and water heater storage tanks.
0 vs. 2009. In fact, the average electricity savings in 2010 (10,746 kWh) represented a 100% increase over the electricity savings in 2009 (5,374 kWh). NMR calculated the EnerGuide point savings by dividing the electricity savings by the d...
AI summary The text discusses electricity savings in 2010 compared to 2009, showing a 100% increase in average electricity savings. NMR calculated EnerGuide point savings by dividing electricity savings by the difference in EnerGuide ratings, resulting in an increase in EnerGuide point savings despite a higher denominator.
) Updated baseline home 74 n/a 33,740 n/a n/a Average participating home 83.5 9.5 22,994 10,746 1,131 Performing the same analysis with the code upgrade baseline home resulted in an EnerGuide rating difference of 3.5 between the average pa...
AI summary The analysis compares the energy efficiency of code upgrade baseline homes and average participating homes in the 2010 New Houses Program. It finds an EnerGuide rating difference of 3.5, with annual electricity savings of 3,611 kWh, resulting in 1,032 kWh saved per EnerGuide point.
611 Updated baseline home 74 1,131 Code upgrade baseline home 80 1,032 NMR added the prescriptive savings estimates for each of the drain water heat recovery measures, hot water pipe insulation, programmable thermostats, and CFLs. Solar ho...
AI summary NMR Group, Inc. provided prescriptive savings estimates for various energy efficiency measures, excluding solar hot water heaters and water heater tank insulation due to potential double counting. Adjustments were made to CFL and thermostat savings estimates to align with other programs and ensure consistency in impact analysis.
ed in the new houses program in 2010 saved a total of 1,321 MWh at the meter. The program‘s tracking database estimated total savings at 1,702 MWh at the meter—29% higher than the evaluated savings. Table 3-10: Comparison of Detailed Track...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program in Nova Scotia achieved meter savings of 1,321 MWh, while tracking estimates showed 1,702 MWh, indicating a 29% discrepancy. The table compares detailed tracking and evaluated savings estimates across various energy efficiency measures.
Total Savings (MWh) 1,321 1,478 Demand Savings (kW) 1,574 1,761 3.5 REM/Rate Validation of HOT2000 In the final segment of our analysis, we compared the calculated savings for a sample of program homes using both the HOT2000 software and R...
AI summary The text discusses a comparison between the HOT2000 and REM/Rate software in estimating energy savings for the 2010 New Houses Program. The objective was to assess the accuracy of HOT2000, which was used to model program savings, by comparing it with REM/Rate, a widely used residential energy analysis software in the United States.
m/products/remrate NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 25 3.5.1 Comparison of Savings The NMR team recreated a sample of ten participating projects and each of the baseline homes in the REM/Rate software. The ten projects were sele...
AI summary The NMR team evaluated the 2010 New Houses Program by comparing savings calculated using HOT2000 and REM/Rate software. Results showed small differences between the two programs, suggesting that HOT2000 can be used to accurately calculate program savings.
efficiency. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 26 lower in REM/Rate, decreasing the solar gain of the model and increasing the heating consumption.35 3) REM/Rate adjusts the estimated electricity consumption of lights and applianc...
AI summary The document compares the REM/Rate and HOT2000 models used in the 2010 New Houses Program, noting differences in solar gain calculations, electricity consumption estimates based on home size, and model accuracy due to data extraction methods and assumptions.
have been slightly inaccurate. Other factors that may have led to differences in the models include differing weather data, different water heating assumptions, and different internal calculations.37 3.6 Heat Pumps NMR conducted an analysi...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of heat pumps on EnerGuide ratings in Nova Scotia homes. Adding an air source heat pump increases the EnerGuide rating from 80 to 84, and a ground source heat pump increases it to 85. This suggests that participation in the NH program may be driven by incentives for installing heat pumps.
If yes: Would you have built the house to achieve a (i. Somewhat 25% FR2ci. Slightly, ii. Somewhat, iii. Significantly) lower level of Significantly 0% energy efficiency? ] Don‘t know 25% The final energy efficiency level of the house woul...
AI summary The text presents survey responses regarding the impact of energy efficiency programs on home construction, with 50% of respondents indicating they would have built homes with the same or higher energy efficiency level even without participating in the program.
of FR2a, FR2c+ci, and FR2b. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 28 Table 3-14: Builder NH Free-ridership Program Influence Questions Free- Question Question Responses Rider Number Score How influential were the following elements i...
AI summary The table evaluates the influence of various elements of the 2010 New Houses Program on builders' decisions to achieve an EnerGuide Rating. Respondents rated the influence of program incentives, information provided, feedback on home plans, and the EnerGuide label on a scale from 1 to 5.
er comparison was not done. NMR Evaluation—2010 New Houses Program Page 32 Table 3-17: Free-ridership by EnerGuide Rating 2010 Builders Homeowners Total Sample size 4 43 47 All respondents greater than or equal to EG80 79% 52% 54% Responde...
AI summary The 2010 New Houses Program's energy savings were estimated at 680 MWh and 810 kW of demand, after accounting for a free-ridership rate of 54%. These results fell short of the energy savings target of 2.0 GWh but exceeded the demand savings target of 640 kW.
upgrade options. Upon completion of construction, the Energy Advisor verified the upgrades that had been completed and notified the homeowners about which rebates that they were eligible to receive. 4.3 Program Communication and Delivery I...
AI summary The document discusses the communication and delivery challenges of the Nova Scotia New Homes (NH) program. It highlights confusion among builders and inspectors due to changes in program support and the discontinuation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program. Program staff have taken steps to address this by increasing promotion efforts.
0, two of four builders surveyed had learned about the program from contractors, one had learned about it from the Nova Scotia Power website, and one had learned about it from an unspecified source.43 42 By contrast, in 2009 the program ha...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program had limited awareness among builders and homeowners, with information primarily coming from contractors, the Nova Scotia Power website, and home shows, rather than through the Nova Scotia Home Builders Association.
1 1 Program Delivery Agent: Nova Scotia Home Builders 8 8 α Association R-2000 Manager 1 1 2 α Nova Scotia/Ideal new home 1 1 2 α show Letter (unspecified source) 1 1 Nova Scotia government 1 1 website Conserve Nova Scotia website 1 1 Prev...
AI summary The document presents data on the delivery of the EnerGuide for New Houses Program in Nova Scotia, including the involvement of various entities such as the Nova Scotia Home Builders Association and Conserve Nova Scotia. It highlights differences in responses compared to a 2009 sample, indicating significant changes in program delivery and participant engagement.
level. NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page 36 4.5 Homeowner Involvement in Decision-Making Homeowners were asked a series of questions regarding their involvement in the decision to participate in the program and the...
AI summary In 2010, about half of the surveyed homeowners became involved in the EnerGuide for New Houses program during the initial planning stage, while slightly under one-third became involved after equipment installation. The data highlights the timing of homeowner engagement in energy efficiency decisions.
of 29) reported that they themselves had made these decisions, nearly 44 However, the program may have had limits to such early involvement given that some houses are built on speculation. NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Progr...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program found that homeowners were primarily responsible for decisions regarding energy efficiency measures, with some joint decisions made with builders. The program's early involvement may have been limited in speculative housing developments.
Joint decision (homeowner and builder) 1 9 This also includes owners who built their own homes. 4.6 Motivations and Barriers 4.6.1 Participant Perspectives The survey asked builders and owners about their motivations and barriers to partic...
AI summary The survey explored motivations and barriers for participation in the EnerGuide for New Houses program. Builders were motivated by energy efficiency, helping homeowners save energy, and receiving rebates. About half of the homeowners participated to save on energy costs, while others were interested in rebates or had already planned energy-efficient measures.
omeowner sample. NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page 38
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on its implementation and effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency in new residential construction.
Table 4-6: Most Important Reason for Participating (Base: Builders, owners who made the decision to participate; multiple responses) 2009 2010 Motivations Builders Homeowners Total Builders Homeowners Total Sample size 13 2 15 4 21 25 To h...
AI summary The table presents the motivations of builders and homeowners for participating in energy efficiency programs in 2009 and 2010, highlighting reasons such as saving on energy costs, receiving rebates, and improving energy efficiency.
1 1 energy efficiency programs Energy efficiency 3 1 4 Already using many components/practices of the 1 1 program For expert advice about measures to install or how to make home 1 1 more energy efficient Option through R2000 1 1 Make house...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs, including the EnerGuide for New Houses Program, and highlights components such as expert advice, home improvements, and marketing tools. It also mentions the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (NMR) as an entity involved.
NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page 39
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on its implementation and effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency in new residential construction in Nova Scotia.
I was thinking about/planning to get energy efficient 1 1 measures in my house anyway Comfort in the home 2 1 Make houses that reduce 1 1 2 energy costs/bills Get rebates 1 1 Make house more attractive to 1 1 potential buyers Request by to...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program evaluation indicates that no builders had concerns about participating, while one homeowner worried about the costs of energy-efficient measures.
21 25 Had concerns about NH 1 1 1 1 prior to participation 4.6.2 Delivery Agent Perspectives Starting in January 2010, Nova Scotia building code required all new homes to have an equivalent minimum EnerGuide rating of 80. Builders or homeo...
AI summary The document discusses perspectives on the Nova Scotia New Homes (NH) program. Builders and homeowners were motivated by the EnerGuide 80 requirement, but some were confused or put off by the performance-based approach. Program staff noted that builders were less motivated by rebates since they went to homeowners, and confusion arose after NRCan stopped supporting EEH, leading to more promotion of the NH program.
d thought that it had ended because NRCan had ceased support for EEH. However, as a result of lost EEH business, service providers were more aggressive in promoting the NH program. 46 Homeowners typically receive the rebates. As the Progra...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program highlights that increased Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) from 13% to 15% in 2010 led to a slight drop in new building activity. The program's energy efficiency measures were generally viewed positively by builders and homeowners, with most reporting increased comfort and significantly lower energy bills.
table. All four builders and about two-thirds of the homeowners (28 of 43) thought that the energy efficiency measures installed through the program would result in significantly lower energy bills. Table 4-9: Impact of Measures on Comfort...
AI summary The table shows that most builders and homeowners believe that energy efficiency measures installed through the program will increase home comfort and lower energy bills. In 2009 and 2010, a majority of respondents reported positive expectations from the measures.
3 3 Don‘t know / refused 1 3 4 12 12 4.8 Program Incentives and Measure Installation Decision 4.8.1 Recommended Measures Not Installed The 2010 survey asked respondents to indicate if there were any upgrades recommended in the initial revi...
AI summary The 2010 survey found that one builder and five homeowners did not install recommended energy efficiency measures, with cost being the primary reason. The measures not installed included air source heat pumps, in-floor heating, solar water heaters, skylights, and solar panels.
Page 42 important reason for not installing these measures, these homeowners most frequently indicated that the measures were too expensive (4).48 Table 4-10: Decided not to Install Some Recommended Measures (Base: Builders and owners invo...
AI summary The text discusses reasons why homeowners decided not to install recommended energy efficiency measures, with cost being the primary factor. It also highlights that prior to the NH program, few builders and homeowners planned to build houses to high EnerGuide ratings, but the program influenced some to aim for higher ratings.
rebates and technical assistance provided by the program. 48 Note that skylights would likely reduce the energy efficiency of the house, and thus the EnerGuide rating, rather than increase it. NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses P...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of skylights on the energy efficiency of a house, noting that they may reduce the EnerGuide rating. It references the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program and is associated with the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (NMR).
Table 4-11: Prior Plans and Program Influence (Base: Builders and owners involved in decisions to participate) Intention to build house with 2009 2010 EnerGuide rating of 80 or higher Builders Homeowners Total Builders Homeowners Total Sam...
AI summary The table presents data on builders and homeowners' intentions to build homes with specific EnerGuide ratings and the influence of rebates and technical assistance on final EnerGuide ratings. It includes sample sizes and responses from 2009 and 2010.
11 3 23 26 Lower 7 2 9 1 17 18 Don‘t know 1 1 2 3 3 None of the builders included in the survey had achieved an actual EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher, so their intentions to build to this level of efficiency prior to participating was no...
AI summary The survey results indicate that none of the builders had achieved an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher prior to participating in the NH program. Most builders and homeowners did not indicate they would have postponed building by more than a year without the program. Three out of four builders believed their budgets could have covered the full cost of energy-efficient upgrades, including incentives, without rebates.
5 38 No 1 5 6 Don‘t Know 3 3 The 2010 survey asked respondents about the influence of various elements of the NH program on their decision to build to the EnerGuide rating. Two out of the four builders and nearly one- half of the homeowner...
AI summary The 2010 survey assessed the influence of elements of the NH program on building to the EnerGuide rating. Builders and homeowners found information, rebates, feedback, and the EnerGuide label influential in their decisions.
plans as extremely or very influential. Two of four builders and about one-half of homeowners (23 of 43) rated the EnerGuide label and designation itself as extremely or very influential. (Table 4-14) Table 4-14: Rating of Program Elements...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program evaluation found that information/advice from energy audits, incentives/rebates, feedback on home plans, and the EnerGuide label were considered influential by builders and homeowners. The EnerGuide label was rated as extremely or very influential by 25 respondents.
provided in the appendix. (Table B-1) NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page 45 4.8.3 Awareness and Influence of Nova Scotia Energy Efficiency Requirements The survey asked builders about the energy efficiency requiremen...
AI summary The survey indicates that all four builders in Nova Scotia were aware of the 2010 energy efficiency requirements incorporated into the building code. They all had working knowledge of these requirements, though only two had received training on energy efficient construction practices.
d not know where they had received their training. Table 4-16: Training on energy efficient construction practices (Base: Builders) Received training on energy efficient construction practices Builders Sample size 4 Yes 2 No 2 NMR Evaluati...
AI summary The 2010 survey found that only two of four builders had received training on energy-efficient construction practices, and two methods—prescriptive measures and EnerGuide Rating—were used to comply with the new building code, with one builder unsure of their method.
Rating 1 R-2000 Don‘t Know 1 Three builders indicated that before the code went into effect, 100 percent of their houses were constructed to meet or exceed the standards now required by the new code. One builder indicated one percent met o...
AI summary The document discusses builders' experiences with new building code compliance, noting that most were already meeting or exceeding the new standards before the code was implemented. Only one builder reported making changes, which increased building costs. The NH program was rated highly by both builders and homeowners for its value.
h value ratings to the NH program. NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page 47 Table 4-18: Rating of Program as Immense/High Value (Base: Builders, owners) 2009 2010 Builders Homeowners Builders Homeowners Sample size 13 1...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, highlighting the value ratings provided by builders and homeowners. Builders and homeowners rated the program as having immense or high value, with specific data provided in the appendix.
2 13 4 16 20 current efficiency Sample size 12 5 17 4 28 32 Final energy audit, overall 12 3 15 4 24 28 Overall rebates provided by program 10 3 13 4 23 27 Recommendations for energy efficient 10 2 12 4 22 26 measures Scheduling and timing...
AI summary The NH survey found that two builders and ten homeowners felt there were energy efficiency upgrades not covered by the program. This feedback is used to suggest improvements for the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program.
12α Don‘t know 5 5 α Significantly different from the 2009 sample at the 90% confidence level. Two of the four builders provided suggestions for additional upgrades they would like to see covered by the program. One indicated that he would...
AI summary Respondents to the survey provided feedback on the EnerGuide for New Houses program, suggesting upgrades like electric hot water and in-floor heating, requesting higher rebates for solar power and heat pumps, and calling for increased marketing, more information during the EnerGuide process, and faster rebate processing.
l rebate. It can get confusing.” NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page 50 Two homeowners said that they would like higher or more accurate efficiency ratings. Two homeowners wanted a faster certification process and two...
AI summary Homeowners expressed a desire for higher or more accurate efficiency ratings, faster certification processes, and increased support for the NH program. There was also a strong desire for continued and higher rebates, increased program awareness, and greater clarity regarding the program.
Table 4-21: Recommendations for improvement (Base: Builders, owners; multiple responses) 2009 2010 Builders Homeowners Builders Homeowners Sample size 13 10 4 43 More marketing/advertising 1 2 3 Make process simpler (e.g. consolidate rebat...
AI summary The table presents recommendations for improving energy efficiency programs based on feedback from builders and homeowners in 2009 and 2010. Key suggestions include more marketing, simplifying processes, providing better information, and increasing rebates.
1 Encourage ratings for all existing homes when they 5 are sold. 4.11.2 Program Staff Recommendations Program Staff offered the following program improvement recommendations: Provide more information on HOT2000 and how to track or adjust...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the EnerGuide for New Houses Program, including providing more information on HOT2000, considering the consequences of raising minimum ratings, and offering information packages to builders. These recommendations aim to enhance program effectiveness and stakeholder engagement.
customer attention to the program. The ductless heat pump measure was added to the program. The program builds toward future increases in building code requirements. The program showed that building energy efficient homes was feasible an...
AI summary The 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program included the addition of ductless heat pumps and aimed to transform the market by increasing awareness of energy efficiency technologies. However, weaknesses included delays in paperwork submission by builders due to lack of monetary incentives and uncertainty about the program's future following the end of the NH program in 2011.
43 Male 8 27 Female 2 16 NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A1 Appendix A: Interview Guides PARTICIPANT QUESTIONNAIRE: NSPI ENH PROGRAM Draft: July 22, 2010 Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GOTO IN...
AI summary The document provides a participant questionnaire for the EnerGuide for New Houses (ENH) program, administered by Conserve Nova Scotia and Nova Scotia Power. It includes a sample of responses and a draft questionnaire used in an evaluation of the 2010 ENH program.
y.‖ GOTO INTRODUCTION] INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _, from NMR Group. I am calling on behalf of the EnerGuide for New Houses program from Conserve Nova Scotia and Nova Scotia Power. 1. We understand you participated in the EnerGuide for...
AI summary The text is an introduction from a survey conducted by the NMR Group on behalf of the EnerGuide for New Houses program. It seeks confirmation from respondents regarding their participation in the program, which provides rebates for energy-efficient upgrades in newly constructed homes.
icipated in the EnerGuide program?‖] Yes [ASK TO SPEAK TO THEM AND REPEAT INTRODUCTION] No [THANK & TERMINATE] Refused [THANK AND TERMINATE] NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A2 ―I‘m NOT calling about your electrici...
AI summary This text outlines a survey script for participants in the EnerGuide for New Houses rebate program, focusing on gathering feedback from builders and homeowners about their experience with the program. It includes prompts for participation, refusal, and scheduling.
gh the EnerGuide New Homes program? 1. Yes 2. No / Not building any houses through program – SKIP TO Q7 8. Don't know – SKIP TO Q7 9. Refused– SKIP TO Q7 NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A3 5. For any houses that w...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions related to the EnerGuide for New Houses program, focusing on participation, energy advisor involvement, and how participants learned about the program. It is part of an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program.
't know 9. Refused Section 1 - How Learned about Program/Reasons for Participating 7. How did you first learn about the EnerGuide for New Houses program? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] 1. (Nova Scotia Power Bill insert) 2. (A utility other...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about how participants learned about the EnerGuide for New Houses program and their reasons for participating. It includes multiple response options and is part of an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program.
ipating in the program? [SAME LIST AS IN Q9 below; ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE. PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS] 9. Were there any other reasons? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE; PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS] 1. (To make house that would save buyers / home...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to participation in the EnerGuide for New Houses program, including reasons for participation and non-participation. It also references the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (NMR) and mentions the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program evaluation.
CEPT ONE RESPONSE; PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS] NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A5 11. Were there any other reasons? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE; PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS] 1. (That my ―bottom line‖ would suffer...
AI summary The text presents a survey section from the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, asking participants about reasons for not participating and concerns related to the program, including cost, efficiency, and logistical issues.
99. Refused [IF Q4 = 2, 8 OR 9 SKIP Q17] NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A7
AI summary This document references the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (NMR) and discusses the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding, possibly related to energy efficiency standards or program performance.
17. Now I‘m going to ask you about your experience with specific aspects of the EnerGuide Program for New Houses. For each one, please tell me if you are very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or very...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with specific aspects of the EnerGuide Program for New Houses, including the review process, energy advisor competence, audit timing, and rebate provisions. It includes conditional questions based on prior responses.
m overall 1 2 3 4 5 9 k. The rebates provided by the program for 1 2 3 4 5 9 electric space and water heating measures 18. [IF Q17a = 4 or 5; OTHERWISE SKIP TO Q20] You indicated that you were not satisfied with the first review of the hou...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer dissatisfaction with energy efficiency reviews and upgrades, specifically focusing on the EnerGuide for New Houses Program. It asks participants to identify reasons for dissatisfaction and whether they declined recommended upgrades.
[RECORD VERBATIM - ALLOW FOR SIX OPEN END RESPONSES] 1. Air source electric heat pump (ANY HEAT PUMP) 2. Solar domestic water heater (ANY SOLAR WATER HEATER) 3. (OTHER) 8. (Don‘t know) 9. (REFUSED) INCENT3. What is the ONE most important r...
AI summary The text presents a survey on energy efficiency measures, including air source heat pumps and solar water heaters, and asks participants about reasons for not installing recommended measures. It also includes a section on free-ridership, asking whether respondents had plans to build energy-efficient homes before engaging with the EnerGuide for New Houses program.
ild houses that achieve a level of energy efficiency similar to the level required to earn an EnerGuide Rating of 80 or higher? 1 Yes 2 No 8 (Don‘t know) 9 (Refused) FR2. [IF ENERGUIDE RATING FROM FILE IS 83 OR HIGHER]: The house you built...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about the EnerGuide for New Houses program, asking participants whether they would have built a house with similar or lower energy efficiency levels without the program's influence. It also explores the impact of the program on energy efficiency and whether participation affected construction timelines.
ad not participated in the program FR2ci. [If yes: Would you have built the house to achieve a (i. Slightly, ii. Somewhat, iii. Significantly) lower level of energy efficiency? ] FR3. According to our records, you received [$XX - READ FROM...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the EnerGuide New Houses program, asking participants about their decision-making process regarding energy efficiency upgrades and the influence of program incentives, information, and feedback on their choices.
2 3 4 5 9 from review of home no extremely DK plans influence influential NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A11 d. The EnerGuide label 1 2 3 4 5 9 and designation itself no extremely DK influence influential Now I w...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about awareness and understanding of recent energy efficiency changes in Nova Scotia's building code, as well as training received on energy-efficient construction practices and methods for compliance.
3. R-2000 4. (don‘t know) NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A12 FR10. Before the code went into effect, about what percentage of your houses were constructed to meet or exceed the standards now required by the new c...
AI summary The document contains survey questions related to the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on builder compliance with new building codes, changes in building practices, and the impact of energy efficiency measures on comfort and energy bills.
2. No 8. Don‘t know 9. Refused NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A13 24. Overall how would you rate the value of the EnerGuide for New Houses program to your company? On a scale from one to five, where one is LITTLE...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about the EnerGuide for New Houses program, asking respondents to rate its value to their company and customers, identify uncovered energy efficiency upgrades, and provide recommendations for program improvements. It also includes demographic questions about the size of the respondent's organization.
ESTIONS Section 9 – Screening 34. Which of the following statements would you say best describes when you became involved in the decisions about the energy efficiency of your home? Would you say.. 1. You were involved from the initial plan...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to homeowner involvement in energy efficiency decisions during home planning and construction, specifically regarding the EnerGuide for New Houses program. It asks about the timing of involvement, who made decisions about participation, and how homeowners learned about the program.
Page A16 Section 10 - How Learned about Program/Reasons for Participating 37. How did you first learn about the EnerGuide for New Houses program? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] 1. (Home Builder) 2. (Nova Scotia Power Bill insert) 3. (A uti...
AI summary The text discusses how participants learned about the EnerGuide for New Houses program and their reasons for participating, with multiple response options provided for both questions.
ating in the program? [SAME LIST AS IN Q39 below] [ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE; PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS\ 39. Were there any other reasons? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE; PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS] 1. (To have a house that would save on energy...
AI summary The text presents a list of reasons for participating in an energy efficiency program, including saving on energy costs, getting expert advice, helping the environment, and receiving rebates. It also asks about concerns participants had before joining the program.
know) 99. (Refused) 40. Before participating, did you have any concerns about taking part in the program? 1. Yes 2. No 8. Don‘t know 9. Refused 41. [IF Q40 = 1] What were those concerns? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT ALL RESPONSES] 1. (That my ―bot...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to participant concerns and satisfaction with the EnerGuide for New Houses Program. It asks about concerns before participation and overall satisfaction with the program, including reasons for dissatisfaction.
CEPT ONE RESPONSE–SAME LIST AS Q44] NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A18 44. Were there any other reasons you were dissatisfied? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] 1. (The review of the plans took too lo...
AI summary The text outlines dissatisfaction reasons with the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, including delays, rebate issues, eligibility concerns, and paperwork. It also asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with specific aspects of the program.
ASK ONLY f thru k) VS S Neither Dissat V.Dissat DK/Ref a. The First Review of the house plans, overall 1 2 3 4 5 9 (This was the review of the house plans evaluating the house‘s energy efficiency with recommended measures.) b. Scheduling a...
AI summary The text presents a survey evaluating the EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on aspects such as the review of house plans, the final energy audit, and rebate provisions for energy-efficient measures. It includes rating scales for various aspects of the program's performance and customer satisfaction.
2. No 8. (Don‘t know) 9. (Refused) NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A20 INCENT21. [IF INCENT20 = YES] What measures were those? [RECORD VERBATIM - ALLOW FOR SIX OPEN END RESPONSES – DO NOT READ] 1. Air source elect...
AI summary This section of the document contains survey questions related to the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on incentives, reasons for not installing recommended energy efficiency measures, and pre-program plans for building or purchasing energy-efficient homes.
ked with anyone about the EnerGuide for New Houses NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A21 program did you have specific plans to build this house to achieve an energy efficiency level similar to what is required to e...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation in the EnerGuide for New Houses Program, asking respondents about their energy efficiency goals, potential delays in home construction, and the impact of the program on energy efficiency levels. It also inquires about the financial impact of the incentive provided by Nova Scotia Power.
a Power, could your budget have accommodated the full cost of the energy efficient upgrades incorporated into your home including the incentive? 1. Yes 2. No 3. (Don‘t know) FR16. How influential were the following elements to your decisio...
AI summary This text is part of a survey assessing the influence of various elements on homeowners' decisions to build energy-efficient homes. It asks respondents about the influence of incentives, information provided by the program, feedback on home plans, and the EnerGuide label on their decision-making process.
2 3 4 5 9 no extremely DK and designation influence influential itself Section 14 - Impact of measures on comfort level and value of the program to customers 50. Do you think the energy efficiency measures installed through the program hav...
AI summary The section asks participants about the impact of energy efficiency measures on home comfort and energy bills, the value of the EnerGuide for New Houses program, and whether there are additional upgrades they would like covered. It also invites recommendations for program improvements.
gram? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC UPGRADES; ACCEPT MULTIPLE] Section 16 - Recommendations for program improvements 55. Do you have any recommendations for improving the EnerGuide for New Houses program? NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses...
AI summary The document includes questions about improving the EnerGuide for New Houses program and collects demographic data from home buyers. It asks about residence type, number of bedrooms, ownership status, electricity bill payment, and whether the home is occupied year-round or seasonally.
8. (Refused) NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A26 65. [DO NOT READ] Gender 1. Male 2. Female [READ: THAT IS ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE FOR YOU. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THIS SURVEY.] NMR Evaluation...
AI summary This text includes a refused question, a page from an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, and a staff interview guide. It outlines the structure of the interview, including confidentiality, recording, and initial program background questions. It also lists program responsibilities and delivery agents involved in the EnerGuide Existing Homes and New Homes programs.
Guide New Homes program i. Brian Hayes at Conserve Nova Scotia ii. Delivery agents 1. Sustainable Housing and Education Consultants – 50% NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A28
AI summary The Guide New Homes program involves Brian Hayes from Conserve Nova Scotia and delivery agents such as Sustainable Housing and Education Consultants, who provide 50% of the service. The evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program is also referenced.
. Sustainable Housing and Education Consultants – 50% NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A28
AI summary The text references a 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program evaluation, highlighting a 50% contribution from Sustainable Housing and Education Consultants and the involvement of NMR.
2. Nova Scotia Home Builders‘ Association – 50% c. Low Income REAP i. Kate McDonald at Conserve Nova Scotia ii. Delivery agents 1. MJM Energy 2. Clean NS 3. Trinity Maintenance Solutions 4. ACAP Cape Breton iii. Low income outreach agent [...
AI summary The text discusses interactions between the Nova Scotia Home Builders' Association and various program delivery agents, including Conserve Nova Scotia and MJM Energy, focusing on communication, coordination, and challenges faced in implementing low-income energy programs. It also inquires about program timelines, energy savings goals, and the development of program theories and logic models.
g Now, turning to the EnerGuide New Homes Program / Now, turning to the EnerGuide Existing Homes Program 8. Does the program have an explicit program theory and logic model? 9. In general, how would you characterize the overall goals of th...
AI summary The text discusses the EnerGuide New Homes and Existing Homes Programs, asking whether they are primarily Resource Acquisition programs, Market Transformation programs, or a combination of both, and why. It also inquires about the presence of an explicit program theory and logic model.
formation program, where the focus is on changing practices and building adoption, and ultimately effect changes in NS provincial energy standards? Or is it a combination of the two? Why?
AI summary The text questions whether an energy efficiency program should focus on changing practices and building adoption, aligning with provincial energy standards, or if it should be a combination of both, and seeks the rationale behind the approach.
ticipate in and promote the program g. Characteristics of target customers that make them the appropriate target for the program h. Customer energy usage and operational characteristics that will result in the achievement of program goals...
AI summary The text outlines questions related to the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on key program targets, their motivations, barriers to participation, and changes to the program since its inception.
far, what are the most important improvements that still need to be made to the program? 25. Are there any other program issues we have not discussed that you would like to mention? NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page...
AI summary The text outlines questions related to program improvements and stakeholder engagement for the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program. It lists individuals and groups to be interviewed, such as delivery agents and energy advisors, and includes an interview guide for delivery agents.
Your comments are confidential. By the way, if I ask you about areas you don‘t know about, please feel free to tell me and we will move on. For transcription purposes we will be recording this call. Do you have any questions before we star...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions aimed at understanding the role and training of an individual or organization involved with the EnerGuide for New Houses Program. It also explores the program's goals, participation, and the organization's business focus related to the program.
rganizations and individuals do you primarily interact with for this program? What is the nature of these interactions? How frequently are you in contact with them? [PROBE IF NOT MENTIONED: How frequent are you in contact with Jordan Dorey...
AI summary The text asks about the primary organizations and individuals interacted with for the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, the nature of these interactions, and the frequency of contact, specifically probing about Jordan Dorey.
uent are you in contact with Jordan Dorey, the program NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A33
AI summary The document references an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, indicating a focus on assessing the program's effectiveness and outcomes.
manager at Nova Scotia Power? What is the nature of these interactions? How frequently are you in contact with Brian Hayes, the program manager at Conserve Nova Scotia? What is the nature of these interactions? Do you have any contacts wit...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions about interactions between program managers, delivery agents, and other organizations involved in energy efficiency programs. It explores the frequency and nature of these interactions, as well as potential coordination and administrative efficiencies.
fic barriers to communication or collaboration with others involved in the program, such as turf issues or bureaucratic red tape? Are there any other overall issues with communication, or opportunities for improvement? 12. Describe how you...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to program implementation, including communication barriers, payment processes, and data tracking and reporting for the EnerGuide for New Houses Program. It focuses on how the program is managed and evaluated.
h of your organization‘s effort for the EnerGuide for NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A34 New Homes Program is spent on fulfilling data tracking requirements specifically for electric measures rebated by Nova Scot...
AI summary The text discusses data tracking and reporting processes for the EnerGuide for New Houses Program, including questions about program management, data capture efficiency, and improvements to the data tracking process. It also inquires about the program delivery process and timing for each step.
ess; for example, how long does it take to complete the initial EnerGuide rating, provide information to the customer, make changes to plans, complete construction, receive rebate checks? 18. Are there any factors that inhibit your ability...
AI summary The text asks about the effectiveness of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, including factors that may inhibit program delivery, the impact of Nova Scotia Power's involvement, and customer behavior regarding recommended changes after an EnerGuide rating.
es of equipment vendors? IF YES: In what way? NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A35
AI summary The document text references an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, indicating a focus on assessing the program's performance and outcomes.
22. In general, which parts of the program process do you think work particularly well? Why? Which parts work less well? Why? 23. Do you have any other suggestions for improving the program delivery process? Builder Issues 24. How aware an...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions directed at stakeholders regarding the effectiveness of a program, focusing on builder and consumer awareness, participation, and potential improvements. It seeks feedback on program delivery, builder engagement, and customer outreach strategies.
keeps customers from participating in the program? NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page A36 34. What impact, if any, has the entry of Nova Scotia Power into the program had on customer awareness and/or response to the...
AI summary The text consists of a series of evaluation questions about the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, focusing on customer awareness, program effectiveness, customer satisfaction, and areas for improvement. It also requests contact information for an energy advisor from an unspecified organization.
n for an energy advisor? NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page B1 Appendix B: Detailed Tables The following table provides a detailed view of Table 4-14 in the report.
AI summary The document text references an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program and includes an appendix with detailed tables, specifically Table 4-14 from the report.
Table B-1: Importance of Program Elements in Achieving Rating (Base: Builders, owners) 2009 2010 Rating: 5= ‘extremely Rating: 5= ‘extremely influential’ influential’ and 1 = ‘no influence’ and 1 = ‘no influence’ Builders n 5 4 3 2 1 DK n...
AI summary The table presents data on the importance of various program elements in achieving an EnerGuide rating, as perceived by builders and homeowners in 2009 and 2010. Builders and homeowners rate the influence of factors such as information/advice from energy audits, incentives/rebates, feedback from home plan reviews, and the EnerGuide label itself.
3 2 1 DK n 5 4 3 2 1 DK Influence- Importance of information/advice 9 1 1 3 2 1 1 43 9 11 10 3 8 2 from energy audit on EnerGuide rating Influence- Importance of incentives/rebates from 9 2 2 4 1 43 6 13 7 6 9 2 EnerGuide program Feedback...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the influence of various factors related to the EnerGuide program, including the importance of information/advice from energy audits, incentives/rebates, feedback from home plan reviews, and the EnerGuide label itself. The data shows significant differences in responses compared to a 2009 sample.
NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page B2 The following table provides a detailed view of Table 4-18 in the report. Table B-2: Value of Program (Base: Builders, owners) 2009 2010 Rating: 5= ‘immense value’ Rating: 5= ‘im...
AI summary This table evaluates the perceived value of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program by builders, owners, and homeowners, using a rating scale from 5 (immense value) to 0 (little value). The data shows responses across different categories, including those who refused to answer or were unsure.
2 1 refused n 5 4 3 2 1 refused Value to 10 3 5 1 1 43 12 22 7 1 1 occupants NMR Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page B3 The following table provides a detailed view of Table 4-19 in the report.
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program, referencing a detailed table (Table 4-19) from a report. The content appears to be part of a regulatory or policy analysis related to energy efficiency in residential construction.
Evaluation—2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program Page B3 The following table provides a detailed view of Table 4-19 in the report.
AI summary The text refers to an evaluation of the 2010 EnerGuide for New Houses Program and mentions a table that provides a detailed view of Table 4-19 in the report.
Builders 13 7 4 1 1 4 1 3 review Homeowners 5 1 3 1 21 10 6 2 1 2 Competence of Energy Builders 13 9 3 1 4 2 2 Advisor Homeowners 5 2 1 1 1 21 10 6 1 1 - 3 Builders 13 8 5 4 1 3 Ease of review process Homeowners 5 2 2 1 21 9 7 1 1 1 2 Repo...
AI summary The text presents data from surveys or assessments related to builders and homeowners regarding their competence with energy advisors, ease of review processes, and recommendations for energy-efficient measures. It includes metrics on how well builders and homeowners perceive the efficiency of homes and the effectiveness of energy recommendations.
4 1 2 1 with measures installed Homeowners 5 2 1 1 1 28 8 11 2 1 1 5 Builders 12 4 8 4 1 3 Final energy audit, overall Homeowners 5 2 1 1 1 28 10 14 0 2 1 1 Scheduling and timing of Builders 12 5 6 1 3 1 audit Homeowners 5 1 2 1 28 14 9 1...
AI summary This document presents the final report of the Impact and Process Evaluation for the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program 2010, submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes data on the number of measures installed, energy audits conducted, scheduling, and rebates provided by the program for both homeowners and builders.
tion: Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program 2010 February 25, 2011 Final Report Submitted to: Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Submitted by: NMR Group, Inc. Principal Investigators: Rohit Vaidya David Barclay NMR Group, Inc....
AI summary This document is a final report evaluating the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program submitted by NMR Group, Inc. to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The report was prepared by principal investigators Rohit Vaidya, David Barclay, and Tom Ledyard.
NMR 4.6 PARTICIPATION BARRIERS .......................................................................................................................... 29 4.7 PURCHASE AND USE BEHAVIORS ......................................................
AI summary This section of the document discusses participation barriers, purchase and use behaviors related to energy efficiency programs, and energy attitudes and behaviors. It includes subsections on socket saturation, CFL installation and removal, purchase behaviors, usage behavior, future purchases, and satisfaction with the program. It also touches on firmographics and includes appendices on stratified ratio estimation and interview questionnaires.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM ENERGY AND DEMAND SAVINGS ..................................................................... I TABLE 2-1: ENERGY GOALS BY YEAR ...................................................................................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to energy and demand savings, installation teams, lighting retrofits, population summaries, sample design, HVAC system efficiency, in-service rates, and free-ridership questions. These tables support analysis of energy programs and their impact.
NMR TABLE 4-11: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EFFICIENT LIGHTING PRODUCTS ........................................... 33 TABLE 4-12: PRIOR PURCHASES OF EFFICIENT LIGHTING PRODUCTS .............................................. 33 TABLE 4-13: PLANS TO...
AI summary The text lists a series of tables related to energy efficiency programs, focusing on the prior knowledge and purchases of efficient lighting products, program influence, and future energy efficiency actions. These tables likely provide data for evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
PACE ............................................................................................................ 42 TABLE 4-25: FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT WORKERS ....................................................................................
AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program (DI) by NMR Group, Inc. for Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes process and impact evaluations, comparing results from 2008, 2009, and 2010. The evaluation involved interviews and surveys with staff, contractors, and participants.
rtion of the cost for the energy efficiency measures offered by the program and to continue to offer installation services for free. Detailed findings and recommendations are provided below. Customer Awareness, Motivations and Barriers Fin...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program highlights the effectiveness of email as a customer notification method and emphasizes the importance of financial incentives in motivating participation. The program provided energy-efficient measures and installation at no cost to participants.
articipant. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page III
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It provides an analysis of the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency and reducing energy consumption through the installation of efficient lighting products.
Customer Awareness, Motivations and Barriers (continued) Finding Recommendation DI-F3. DI-R3. As in 2008 and 2009, the majority of 2010 respondents (97%) Since the majority of DI program participants have reported no prior participation in...
AI summary The majority of DI program participants in 2010 had no prior experience with energy efficiency programs, highlighting the need for the DI program to have a positive impact. Lack of time was the top barrier to pursuing additional energy efficiency measures, and some respondents could not provide reasons for not pursuing them.
ason that they information for identifying other energy efficiency had not pursued additional energy efficiency measures. This may measures they could implement. With the expansion indicate that respondents didn‘t have the time to research...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures, such as lack of time and financing. It also mentions the expansion of the SBLS program and the need for financing options in collaboration with local banks.
in the program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page V LEDs Finding Recommendation DI-F8. DI-R8. About two out of five respondents (44%) reported that they had Given the unchanged awareness levels...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found that awareness of LED exit lights was low, with few participants having installed them prior to or after the program. Recommendations include promoting the program actively and ensuring all exit lights are retrofitted with LEDs during visits.
that 30% of their exit signs did not contain LEDs. In addition, nearly three out of ten respondents (27%) said that even after participating in the DI program none of their exit signs contained LEDs. Satisfaction with the Program Finding R...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found that 30% of exit signs did not contain LEDs, even after participation in the program. Most respondents were satisfied with the program overall, with 97% expressing satisfaction and 85% being very satisfied.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 1 2 Program Description and Data Tracking 2.1 Program Description The DI program was first launched in 2008 as a pilot program with an energy savings target of...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program was extended due to its popularity and the availability of CFLs. The program aimed to achieve 19,960 MWh in energy savings, and 25,233 MWh were achieved. The program was managed by 12 teams across eight regions in Nova Scotia.
2.1.1 Program Theory The program theory and logic model was updated to reflect any changes to the program compared to 2009. The program theory and logic model are included below. Program Background The Efficient Lighting Products – Direct...
AI summary The Direct Install (DI) program aims to promote the adoption of energy-efficient lighting products, such as CFLs and LED exit lights, through market transformation and resource acquisition. The program seeks to increase awareness and usage in the commercial sector and replace incandescent lights with efficient alternatives at participating businesses.
opportunity for transforming the market. 2 NMR (2010) Impact and Process Evaluation: Efficient Lighting Products Retail Markdown Program 2009. Submitted February 25th, 2010 3 See Table 4-11. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Produc...
AI summary The document refers to an evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program conducted by NMR. It also cites a prior impact and process evaluation of a 2009 retail markdown program.
The DI program's marketing and outreach channels include direct contact through a subcontractor, the program contractor, and partnerships with local business associations such as chambers of commerce and business improvement areas. Program...
AI summary The DI program utilizes various marketing and outreach strategies, including partnerships with local business associations, telephone outreach, and on-site visits, to promote energy efficiency initiatives to small businesses. Program activities include training representatives, obtaining program products, and installing energy-efficient lighting.
Transfer of understanding. Small business owners will remember the energy and bill savings they realized from participating in the program and consider energy efficient options when making decisions to purchase other energy using equipme...
AI summary The document discusses the DI program's impact on small businesses, highlighting benefits like energy savings and awareness, as well as barriers such as liability concerns, perceptions of quality, and inaccessibility of equipment. It also outlines short-term outcomes, including awareness through marketing and customer participation in installations.
Customers allow DI representatives to install CFLs and LEDs. After becoming aware of the opportunities offered by the program, customers allow DI program representatives to install qualifying equipment: o 13 Watt, 23 Watt, 14 Watt (R20)...
AI summary The Direct Install Program (DI) allows customers to have energy-efficient lighting, such as CFLs and LEDs, installed by DI representatives. The program aims to increase knowledge about energy efficiency, boost demand for efficient lighting, and ultimately lead to long-term energy savings and market transformation through standard practices.
Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 7 2.2 Program Tracking The subcontractor tracked installations and also conducted brief satisfaction calls with participants after lights were installed....
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program tracked installations by collecting detailed data including business information, installation details, bulb types, wattage replaced, and estimated energy savings. However, limited information was recorded on the pre-existing conditions of exit signs.
e-existing conditions. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 8 3 Impact Evaluation The NMR team evaluated the impacts of the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install Program through on- site visits to...
AI summary The NMR team evaluated the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install Program by conducting on-site visits and using engineering algorithms to estimate energy savings. A total of 41,349 MWh in energy savings was tracked across 5,447 locations, with the majority of installations consisting of 13W CFL twist style bulbs.
ing purposes Program Administrators and the NMR Team collapsed some sites to reflect all activity performed at the site in instances where installations at a given location occurred over several days. Table 3-1: Population Summary Quantity...
AI summary The document discusses the installation of energy-efficient products under the Efficient Products Direct Install program, including the use of Model-Based Statistical Sampling (MBSS) to evaluate program impact. It includes a summary table of installations and energy savings across various product types and mentions that the program year had approximately six weeks left at the time of sampling.
ng the sample population by 4 Since there were multiple technologies installed at some sites, the number of sites in Table 3-1 exceeds the number of sites that participated in the program in 2010. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, including the sample design used to estimate annual energy savings. A sample of 25 sites was targeted, but only 22 were visited due to scheduling and accessibility challenges. The methodology aimed for ±10% precision at the 90% confidence interval.
ugh selected for the purpose of estimating energy savings, provides a fairly good representation of those building types. Table 3-3: Final Sample Design: Building Type Building Type Population Sample Church 241 3 Charity 57 0 Community Fac...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used in evaluating the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, including on-site work consisting of reviewing installed lighting, facility walk-throughs, logger installation/removal, and savings analysis to estimate energy savings.
stallation/removal, and a savings analysis. Each part is described below. The on-site engineering assessment process culminated in the development of gross estimates of savings for the on-site sample. 3.2.1 Tracking Data Review The first s...
AI summary The process of on-site engineering assessments includes reviewing tracking data and conducting facility walk-throughs to verify installed measures and gather energy savings data. Auditors assess installation accuracy, collect usage data, and install loggers to evaluate the effectiveness of energy efficiency measures.
Install time-of-use lighting loggers to gather operating hours of unique schedules identified on- site; Collect available information with which to assess interactive effects. 3.2.3 Lighting Loggers So as to compile the most accurate d...
AI summary Lighting loggers were installed to collect operating hours data for various room types, and standard analysis spreadsheets were used to calculate demand and energy savings, both with and without interactive effects, using pre- and post-retrofit information.
KEMA calculated the impact of interactive effects for each site. In the context of energy savings analysis, the term ―interactive effect‖ refers to a related change in another devices‘ electrical use as influenced by the implementation of...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects in energy savings analysis, particularly focusing on how energy conservation measures, such as lighting retrofits, influence heating and cooling systems. Interactive savings are determined using factors like direct lighting kW reduction, coincidence factors, and system efficiencies, with simplified methods used for reliable estimates.
hting coincidence factor as determined from specific measured logger interval data or from a reported schedule when data was not available. While on-site, evaluators assessed whether areas with lighting were served by cooling systems and t...
AI summary The document describes a method for calculating cooling kWh and kW energy savings from efficient lighting installations, taking into account factors such as the cooling system's COP, the percentage of space cooled, and the timing of lighting usage.
te kW Savings (% of space cooled) (% of lights on at 5 - 6 PM) 0.80 Cooling System COP Where 0.80 is the demand interaction factor between the lights and cooling system at 5-6 PM. The HVAC System Efficiencies were taken from...
AI summary The text explains a formula for calculating kW savings based on lighting and cooling system efficiency, with a demand interaction factor of 0.80. It references a lookup table of HVAC system efficiencies (COP) for different types of cooling and heating systems used in calculations.
0.90 Refrigerated Area 2.00 Water to Air Heat Pump 4.21 Non-Electric 40.0 The following calculations were used in the instances that electric heating occurred in the space equipped with retrofitted lighting. However, the majority of sites...
AI summary The text discusses calculations for heating kWh and kW energy savings related to the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. It uses factors like the energy interaction factor (0.15) and demand interaction factor (0.133) between lighting and heating systems, and notes that most sites were heated via oil or gas, which had minimal impact on interactive savings.
or the on-site sample, including interactive effects. A one-to-one reference line is the plotted line on the diagonal, which would represent the line on which all points would fall if the tracking system savings estimates were exactly corr...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found discrepancies between on-site savings and tracking system estimates. At several sites, fewer lights were installed or operating hours were lower than expected, leading to a 77.8% installation rate across all sites.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 14 Figure 3-1: Observed On-site versus Tracking System Savings
AI summary The document presents a figure comparing observed on-site savings with tracking system savings from the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, highlighting discrepancies between actual and recorded energy savings.
Table 3-5 shows the installed annual energy and demand savings for the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install Program. This table is comprised of the original population tracking savings followed by the expanded savings estimates from the...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install Program's energy and demand savings were evaluated, revealing discrepancies in installation rates. The NMR team identified overestimations in program savings, with the tracking system overstating savings by 2,294 MWh. Efficiency Nova Scotia addressed the issue by instructing the implementation contractor to quantify the discrepancies and make adjustments.
lize this information to inform an alternative savings estimate, we can assume that the reduction in savings of 2,294 MWh (or 5.5% of tracking) can also be considered an estimate of the installation rate, albeit a rate that is determined t...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, comparing initial and revised energy savings estimates. The initial estimate was 26,401 MWh, while the final revised estimate, adjusted using an installation rate from the implementation contractor, is 29,853 MWh. The evaluation also includes demand savings based on different metrics.
r Installation Rate Evaluated Annual Energy Savings (Meter) 2929,853 72.2% 6,259 Evaluated Annual Savings (Generator) 3232,617 78.9% 66,839 As part of the analysis, we also reviewed the self-reported hours of operation at the time of our v...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found that the in-service rate for CFLs was 98.4%, while LED exit lights had a 100% in-service rate. However, on-site visits revealed a much lower in-service rate of 77.8%, indicating discrepancies between self-reported data and actual usage.
used is 1.0926 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 16 3.4 Spillover Spillover is additional energy-efficient equipment installed by participants due to program influences and in the absence of dir...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program led to spillover effects, with 19% of participants installing additional CFLs and 3% installing additional LEDs. The program influenced over 78% of respondents who made additional lighting upgrades, though spillover rates for LEDs were higher compared to previous years.
decision to install 10 additional LED exit lights. The resulting spillover rates were relatively lower for CFLs and relatively higher for LEDs compared to 2008 and 2009, although not significantly so. Table 3-7: Additional Purchases of CFL...
AI summary The text discusses the spillover rates of additional purchases of CFLs and LEDs in 2008, 2009, and 2010, noting that the rates were relatively lower for CFLs and higher for LEDs. It also shows the influence of the Direct Install Program on these purchases.
Table 3-9: CFL Free-ridership Program Influence Questions Free- Question Question Responses Rider Number Score How influential were the following to your decision to install [CFLs or/LEDs]? Please give your answer on a scale of 1 to 5, whe...
AI summary The table assesses the influence of various aspects of the CFL and LED free-ridership programs on participants' decisions to install energy-efficient lighting products. Respondents rated factors such as free CFLs, free installation services, and information received during initial contact by program representatives on a scale of 1 to 5.
77% 83% NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 22 3.7 Energy Savings Estimation Table 3-13 presents the net installed annual energy and demand savings for the 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install p...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Products Direct Install program achieved significant energy and demand savings, exceeding its goals and surpassing the combined savings of previous years. The majority of savings came from CFL installations, with LED Exit Lights contributing a smaller portion. The program showed substantial growth compared to 2008 and 2009.
he implementation contractor‘s project manager and the subcontractor‘s project manager. The interviews covered a variety of program-related topics including program goals, program theory and delivery. 4.1.2 Participant Survey & Sample Desi...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, including interviews with program participants and analysis of CFL and LED installations. The sample design for the evaluation was modified due to limited availability in some strata, and the 2010 survey showed higher installation numbers compared to the population average.
4-2 shows the estimated population, sample size and sampling error for the 2008, 2009 and 2010 telephone surveys. For each survey, the sampling error was less than 10% at the 90% confidence interval. Table 4-2: Sample Size and Sampling Err...
AI summary The document provides data on sampling errors for telephone surveys conducted in 2008, 2009, and 2010, and details the design and implementation of a program that installed CFLs and LED exit lights in small commercial businesses across Nova Scotia to achieve energy and demand savings goals.
† Other 0 <1 4 Don‘t know 3 2 1 12 Throughout this report, the symbol ‗σ‘ is used to indicate that results between 2008 and 2009 respondents are significantly different at the 90% confidence level. The symbol ‗†‘ is used to indicate that r...
AI summary The DI program continues to attract participants who have not previously engaged in DSM Administrator energy efficiency programs, with 97% of respondents reporting no prior participation. The data shows a slight decline in previous participation from 2008 to 2010.
2008 2009 2010 Sample size 70 70 77 Previous participation 7% 6% 3% Table 4-5: Prior Energy Efficiency Programs Reported Programs 2008 2009 2010 Direct Install Program 1 Unspecified Conserve 1 Nova Scotia Program Lighting Program 2006 to 5...
AI summary The text presents data from Table 4-5, showing participation in prior energy efficiency programs from 2008 to 2010. It includes sample sizes and specific programs like the Direct Install Program, Lighting Program, and others. The data highlights participation trends and program names.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 28 4.5 Participation Motivations When asked their reasons for participating in the DI program in 2010, the majority of respondents reported a financial benefit...
AI summary The majority of participants in the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program were motivated by financial benefits, with 84% citing energy cost savings as their primary reason. A quarter also mentioned environmental concerns, while over a quarter noted financial benefits as secondary motivations, including reduced maintenance costs.
Table 4-6: Reasons for Participating 2008 2009 2010 Second Second Second Most Most Most Most Most Most Important Important Important Most Important Important Important Important Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motiva...
AI summary The table presents the reasons for participating in energy efficiency programs from 2008 to 2010. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs, with percentages showing a consistent trend. Other motivations include helping the environment and taking advantage of incentives, though these were less significant compared to cost savings.
1 6 5 4 3 Reduce carbon † 4 2 3 11 footprint Reduce σ† 3 10 <1 13 maintenance costs Improve existing 3 9 5 4 lighting conditions Past program 1 participation Part of a green 1 initiative Assistance with 1 changing lighting Offer at our 1 f...
AI summary The text presents a table with various initiatives aimed at reducing carbon footprint, improving lighting conditions, and reducing maintenance costs. It also includes information on past program participation, assistance with changing lighting, and other initiatives. The table includes responses categorized under different headings such as 'Other' and 'Don‘t know'.
100 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 30 When asked what was preventing them from pursuing additional energy efficiency measures, two out of five 2010 respondents (40%) were unable to provide a...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found that 40% of respondents could not provide a reason for not pursuing additional energy efficiency measures. The most common barrier was lack of time (25%), followed by lack of financing, interest, and information (each 8%). There was a shift from prior years, with more emphasis on time constraints and fewer mentions of lack of available measures.
fewer mentioned a lack of additional measures to pursue; this may indicate that potential participants are beginning to recognize additional opportunities but lack the resources (time) to pursue them. Table 4-8: Barriers to Pursuing Additi...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to pursuing additional energy efficiency, with a notable increase in the percentage of respondents citing a lack of time as a barrier from 2008 to 2010. Other barriers include lack of financing, lack of interest, and lack of information, though these show varying trends over the years.
ts surveyed (31%) had had any LED exit lights installed. This may indicate the need for program teams to more thoroughly examine opportunities for LED exit lights or opportunities may be lost. Table 4-9: Socket Saturation 2009 2010 Percent...
AI summary The survey indicates that only 31% of respondents had LED exit lights installed, suggesting potential missed opportunities for energy efficiency programs. Socket saturation data from 2009 to 2010 shows increasing adoption of LEDs over CFLs, with higher saturation rates in the higher socket ranges.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 33 4.7.3 Purchase Behaviors Prior to participating in the DI program, nearly seven out of ten 2010 respondents (69%) reported that they had been aware of the...
AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program evaluation shows that 69% of respondents were aware of the benefits of CFLs and 44% of LED exit lights. Most respondents had previously purchased efficient lighting products, with 94% having bought CFLs. Fewer respondents in 2010 reported replacing T-12 lighting with high efficiency T-8s or T-5s compared to 2009.
2010 respondents (78%) reporting additional installations of CFLs or LEDs indicated that the DI program had influenced their decision to install these additional bulbs. 13 (Table 4-14 and Table 4-15)
AI summary In 2010, 78% of respondents reported that the DI program influenced their decision to install additional CFLs or LEDs, indicating the program's effectiveness in promoting energy-efficient lighting.
rgy efficient lighting. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 36 Respondents were also asked if participation in the DI program had influenced them to pursue additional energy efficiency actions, ot...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found that nearly one-third of respondents indicated that participation influenced them to take additional energy efficiency actions, such as behavior changes or heating system modifications, though fewer took actions related to lighting, windows, or energy management systems.
five respondents (17%). (Table 4-16) Table 4-16: Influence of Program on Additional Energy Efficiency Actions Respondents
AI summary The text references a table (Table 4-16) that examines the influence of a program on additional energy efficiency actions, with five respondents accounting for 17% of the responses.
9 8 Insulation 16 8 8 Refrigeration 5 5 8 Scoping, feasibility, technical 5 7 4 assessments Solar hot water 4 Cooling 5 3 Applied for a grant 5 Motors 3 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 37 4.7....
AI summary The survey found that 82% of respondents used their new efficient lighting products about the same as the lighting that had been replaced, indicating stable usage behavior post-installation.
ut instead of other less efficient lighting.‖ The majority of respondents (82%) reported that they used their new lighting ‗about the same‘ as the lighting that had been replaced. (Table 4-17) Table 4-17: Use of New Lighting Respondents 20...
AI summary The majority of respondents (82%) used their new lighting about the same as the lighting that was replaced. Most respondents (95%) indicated they would be likely to purchase energy efficiency equipment in the future, with 80% stating they would be very likely to do so when replacing equipment.
fficient equipment, and four out of five respondents (80%) reported that they would be ‗very likely‘ to purchase energy-efficient equipment when replacing equipment in the future. (Table 4-18) Table 4-18: Future Energy Efficiency Purchases...
AI summary The text discusses survey results showing high customer satisfaction with the Direct Install (DI) program for energy-efficient lighting products. 80% of respondents indicated they would be very likely to purchase energy-efficient equipment in the future. 97% of respondents were satisfied with the program overall, with 84% reporting very high satisfaction. However, satisfaction with installation scheduling and timing was lower in 2010 compared to 2009.
90-99% Average 21.4% 15.4% 18.0% As in 2008 and 2009, the large majority of respondents reported that reducing energy usage (96%) and managing energy costs (95%) was important to their businesses and around four out of five respondents rep...
AI summary A majority of respondents emphasized the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to their businesses. Additionally, one-third of participants in the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program indicated that nearly 38% required energy efficiency measures to pay for themselves within one year.
nizations‘ payback requirements for energy efficiency measures. Among them, nearly two out of five (38%) required that energy efficiency measures pay for themselves in less than one year. (Table 4-22) Table 4-22: Required Payback for Energ...
AI summary The text discusses the payback requirements for energy efficiency measures, noting that nearly 38% of respondents required measures to pay for themselves in less than one year. It also outlines the firmographic profiles of survey respondents for the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, highlighting a decrease in retail business participation and the limited availability of business type information in program records.
2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page A1
AI summary This document evaluates the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It provides an analysis of the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency through the installation of efficient lighting products.
2 h 1 N h nh s h2 e ek eh 2 1 nh 1 ksh ek y k b xk ^ Next, the relative precision of the estimate Y ra was calculated using the equation: ^ 1.645 V Y ra rp ^ Y ra NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficien...
AI summary This document discusses the evaluation of Nova Scotia Power's 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, including an interview questionnaire used to gather participant feedback for program improvement.
answer some questions related to your participation in this program, the information you provide will be used to help Nova Scotia Power evaluate and improve the program. Is this a good time for you? 1. Our records indicate that your compan...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for participants in Nova Scotia Power's Efficient Lighting Products Program, aiming to gather feedback to improve the program. It includes questions about participation confirmation, identification of the most knowledgeable individual, and scheduling of interviews.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page B2 Section I. Reasons for participating & Previous Purchases 5. Did your company / organization participate in any other Nova Scotia Power energy efficiency pro...
AI summary This section of the document asks participants in the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program whether they had previously participated in any Nova Scotia Power energy efficiency programs and, if so, which ones and in what years.
. 2003 5. 2004 6. 2005 7. 2006 8. 2007 9. 2008 10. 2009 11. 2010 99. Don‘t Know 8. How did you first learn about the Efficient Lighting Products Program? [RANDOMIZE AND READ 1-8, THEN 9] (Choose one) 1. From a phone call from an Efficient...
AI summary The text includes a survey question about how participants first learned about the Efficient Lighting Products Program, with options such as phone calls, mail, Nova Scotia Power's website, and word of mouth. It also references an evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program by NMR.
ded by contractor) 11. (Past participation in utility programs) 12. (Other (Please explain )) 99. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) 11. Prior to your company / organization participating in the Efficient Lighting Products Program were you aware th...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions aimed at evaluating prior awareness and participation in the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. Questions focus on awareness of CFLs and LED exit lights, as well as previous purchases of energy-efficient lighting products.
_% [999 = Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page B5 14g. After participating in the Efficient Lighting Products Program, what percentage of your company‘s / organization‘s ex...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the participation and outcomes of the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. It asks respondents about the percentage of LED lamps in exit signs and whether they have removed any installed compact fluorescent or LED exit lights.
RANGE, RECORD MIDDLE VALUE, OR ROUND UP. IF ‗DON‘T KNOW,‘ PROBE FOR BEST GUESS TO NARROW IN ON A NUMBER.] [RECORD PERCENT] _% [999=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] 17. What percent of these compact fluorescent bulbs did you remove? Again, I‘m aski...
AI summary The text is part of a survey or evaluation form asking participants about the removal of compact fluorescent bulbs installed through the Efficient Lighting Products Program, including reasons for removal and what was done with the removed bulbs.
do with the LED exit lights you removed? (Threw away) (Put them away, stored them) (Gave them away) (Installed them at another location) (Other [Specify _]) 9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall FREE-RIDERSHIP FR1. Did your company / organization hav...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Efficient Lighting Products Program, specifically asking about the disposal or reuse of LED exit lights and whether companies had prior plans to install CFLs or LED exit lights before engaging with the program. It also asks about potential actions taken in the absence of the program.
am, which of the following actions do you think you would have taken? Please select all that apply. Would you have… [For FR2a – h 1 = YES, 2 = NO, 9 = Don’t know; For FR2e-f if YES ask FR2ei & FR2fi] FR2a. [IF CFLFlag = 1] Postponed instal...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to consumer behavior regarding the installation of energy-efficient lighting products, such as CFLs and LED exit lights, under the Direct Install Program by Nova Scotia Power. It explores the impact of the program on installation decisions and budget considerations.
o to Q0] 9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall [If purchased and installed both CFLs and LED exit lights, Go to Q0, Else go to Q0] [IF Q0=YES] About what quantity of these additional CFLs did your company / organization purchase on its own since part...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, focusing on customer purchases of CFLs and LED exit lights, their influence on self-purchasing decisions, and broader energy efficiency actions taken by participants.
pation in the Efficient Lighting Products Program influenced any other energy efficiency actions taken by your company / organization? Yes No [Go to Q0] 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall [Go to Q0]) What are the other measures that your company...
AI summary The text includes questions about energy efficiency measures and their implementation, such as the Efficient Lighting Products Program, and explores reasons for not pursuing additional measures. It also asks about payback requirements for energy efficiency initiatives.
n require energy efficiency measures pay for themselves in order for your company / organization to implement a measure—that is, what are your payback requirements? [999 = Don‘t know/don‘t recall] Section III. Satisfaction with Program & F...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to energy efficiency programs, focusing on payback requirements, satisfaction with the Efficient Lighting Products Program, and barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures. It includes sections on program satisfaction, future purchase intentions, and barriers to action.
arriers that your company / organization faced in implementing the energy efficiency measures provided through the program? Yes No [Go to Q45] 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) [Go to Q45] What was the most important barrier? (Do not read) (Con...
AI summary The text is a survey question asking about barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures through a program, followed by a list of possible barriers and a question about the importance of reducing energy usage on a scale from 1 to 5. The survey appears to be part of an evaluation of a direct install program for efficient lighting products.
ow/Don‘t recall) On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all important‘ and 5=‗very important‘, how important is reducing energy usage to your company / organization? [9 = Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all im...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to energy usage importance, energy cost management, and the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs. It also asks for suggestions to improve the Efficient Lighting Products Program and collects information on business operating hours.
Hour (0000 - 2400) Closing Hour (0000 - 2400) A. Monday B. Tuesday C. Wednesday D. Thursday E. Friday F. Saturday G. Sunday Other than scheduled holidays (e.g. national holidays, Christmas, New Year, etc.) and regular days of the week that...
AI summary The text outlines a survey format to gather information about business closures and lighting usage patterns. It includes questions about the number of days a business is closed annually, specific periods of closure, and the percentage of lights used under different lighting conditions. The document also references the 'Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program' and includes a company name, NMR.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page B18 Cloudy % Dark % Bright % Section IV. Firmographics What is the principal building activity where the energy efficiency improvements were implemented? [DO NO...
AI summary The document contains a survey form from the Evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. It includes questions about building activity, floor space, number of employees, and company structure. The survey is part of an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives.
ny independent, or part of a larger company? Independent Part of a larger company Don‘t know Refused Other ( _) 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) NMR Process and Impact Evaluation: Prescriptive Rebate Programs 2010 February 25, 2011 Final Repor...
AI summary This document outlines the final report of a process and impact evaluation of prescriptive rebate programs conducted in 2010, submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation by NMR Group, Inc. The evaluation was carried out by a team of principal investigators and includes contributions from KEMA, Inc.
50-2 Howard Street, Somerville, MA 02144 Phone: (617) 284-6230 Fax: (617) 284-6239 www.nmrgroupinc.com Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................
AI summary The document outlines the Business Energy Rebate (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices programs, including their program theories and logic models. It also discusses the impact evaluation of the BER program, focusing on population and program activity in 2010 and savings methodology.
............................................................ 38 5.6.2 Spillover ................................................................................................................................................. 40 5.7 ENERGY...
AI summary The text outlines sections of a report, including topics such as spillover effects, energy attitudes, customer satisfaction, and firmographics. It also references an appendix containing interview guides. No specific arguments or entities are discussed in this excerpt.
Tables TABLE 1: PROGRAM ENERGY AND DEMAND SAVINGS SUMMARY ........................................................ I TABLE 3-1: 2010 POPULATION TRACKING SUMMARY..................................................................................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables summarizing energy and demand savings from various programs, including lighting, motor and drive efficiency, HVAC, and free-ridership assessments. These tables are part of a broader evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives and their impacts.
.............. 25 TABLE 4-2: BALLAST AND BULB SYSTEM SAVINGS SUMMARY ............................................................. 26 TABLE 4-3: LIGHTING IN ELECTRICALLY CONDITIONED SPACES .....................................................
AI summary The document contains a series of tables summarizing energy savings from various efficiency measures, including lighting systems, HVAC efficiencies, and program participation details. These tables provide quantitative data on savings and program implementation.
NMR TABLE 5-5: REASONS FOR PARTICIPATING .................................................................................................. 36 TABLE 5-6: IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATIONS FOR PRODUCT INSTALLATION ....................................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to program participation, barriers, motivations, and satisfaction with an energy efficiency program. It includes data on budget capabilities, installation of energy-efficient measures, and the influence of program elements on participation and additional energy efficiency actions.
will be terminated once the legislation is enacted. The impact evaluation was based on visits to nine sites with installed lighting and visits with four of the six major distributors for the program. Impact Evaluation Findings For the BER...
AI summary The impact evaluation of the BER and SLC programs found that combined energy savings were 6,748.3 MWh and demand savings were 1,267.3 kW, falling short of the program targets of 10,000 MWh and 2,420.0 kW. The evaluation involved site visits, surveys, and data from program records.
Net-to-Gross Ratio (%) 54% 54% 84% 84% N/A N/A Net Savings at Generator 72.8 503.3 1,194.5 6,245.0 1,267.3 6,748.3 1 These two programs are known collectively as the Prescriptive Rebate Programs. 2 These targets included 8 GWh of energy sa...
AI summary The BER program was launched in 2010 as part of the Prescriptive Rebate Programs, with 13 participants receiving incentives. While participants expressed satisfaction, there is a need to improve incentive levels and develop a more rational structure to enhance program effectiveness and achieve energy savings targets.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page III
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on their implementation and effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency.
. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page IV Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation BER-F7. BER-R7. All of the respondents said that managing and reducing energy costs BER participants appear to be a group of...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program, launched in 2010, provides financial incentives for businesses to purchase energy-efficient equipment. Respondents emphasized the importance of managing energy costs, though few had participated in rebate programs prior to BER, and few took additional energy-efficient actions after participating.
se of qualified energy efficient equipment. Eligible product categories include: lighting, motors and drives, HVAC, refrigeration and compressed air equipment. The BER program was modeled closely after successful prescriptive pro...
AI summary The BER program focuses on the use of qualified energy-efficient equipment across several product categories, modeled after Efficiency Vermont's successful prescriptive programs. EVT provided guidance on eligible technologies, eligibility criteria, savings estimates, and approved product lists.
the equipment to apply for a rebate. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 2
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on the process for applying for rebates related to energy-efficient equipment.
Program Assumptions The following assumptions underlie the program‘s process: Outreach and marketing. The outreach performed by the Sales Leads, a marketing contractor, and the outbound commercial call group will be sufficient to generat...
AI summary The document outlines assumptions, barriers, and short-term outcomes for an energy efficiency program. Key assumptions include sufficient outreach, funding availability, and equipment access. Barriers include lack of knowledge, time, and capital. Short-term outcomes focus on generating interest, purchasing, and installing energy-efficient equipment.
oming aware of the program, customers identify and purchase energy efficient equipment. Customers install energy efficient equipment. After purchasing energy efficient equipment, customers install the energy efficient equipment. Mid-Term...
AI summary The document outlines the outcomes of the BER program, including energy savings, bill reductions, increased knowledge about energy efficiency, and long-term benefits such as emission reductions and avoidance of new plant construction. The program encourages the adoption of energy-efficient equipment by businesses.
ficient products and services as standard practices. Due to first-hand experience, energy efficient products become standard practice for business customers throughout the province. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page...
AI summary The document discusses the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, which provides financial incentives for the installation of high-performance T8 lighting in non-residential facilities in Nova Scotia. The program is expected to become obsolete once legislation mandating the use of High Performance T8 lighting is enacted.
Program Assumptions The following assumptions underlie the program‘s process: Availability of HP lighting products. The distributors have access to sufficient quantities of the HP lighting products to meet customer demands. Program inc...
AI summary The document outlines assumptions and barriers related to a high-performance (HP) lighting program. Key assumptions include product availability, incentive passing to customers, and full installation of incentivized products. Barriers include misplaced incentives, higher first costs, product availability issues, lead times, and lack of reliable information.
rom HP lighting is a major issue for professionals who are designing new buildings and for building managers who are seeking to replace lighting equipment. Lack of experience with HP lighting. Design professionals, building managers and...
AI summary The document discusses challenges with the adoption of high-performance (HP) lighting, including a lack of experience among professionals and end users' unawareness of incentivized HP lighting. It also notes the difficulty in verifying the installation of program incentivized lighting, particularly for smaller projects.
ses for smaller projects. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 7 Short-Term Outcomes All eligible distributors are enrolled into the program. Distributors become more active in the program and continue promoting the...
AI summary The document outlines the short-term, mid-term, and long-term outcomes of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on the increased adoption of high-performance (HP) lighting, improved lighting quality, energy savings, and long-term emission reductions and infrastructure avoidance.
ons. Avoidance of plant construction. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 8 2.2 Program Logic Model Figure 2-1: Smart Lighting Choices Program Logic Model NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 9 3...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on the Smart Lighting Choices Program and the Building Efficiency Rebate (BER) program. It discusses program logic models, population data, and energy savings achieved in 2010.
Demand Projects HVAC Lighting Motors Total Savings (kW) Retrofit 8 5.1 529.5 229.7 764.3 120.9 New Construction 5 3.3 5.8 18.4 27.5 6.3 Total 13 8.4 535.3 248.1 791.8 127.2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 10 At the...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs involved visiting eleven sites where energy efficiency measures had been implemented, representing nearly one-third of the total tracked savings. These sites included retrofitted and newly constructed buildings with various energy-saving equipment.
visited, including the project number, type of equipment installed, and tracking connected demand and energy savings. Our on-site sample represented nearly one-third of the total 2010 tracked savings. Table 3-2: 2010 BER Population Trackin...
AI summary The text provides a summary of the 2010 BER Population Tracking Summary (Sample Frame), detailing energy and demand savings from various projects. The sample represents nearly one-third of the total tracked savings, with specific data on each project's category, energy savings in MWh, and connected demand savings in kW.
of the approach taken for each NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 11 measure type included in the sample. The evaluated savings used the most accurate information available; secondary sources and assumptions were empl...
AI summary This section evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on lighting savings analysis. It outlines the formula used by the DSM Administrator to calculate energy savings, including interactive effects such as cooling credits and heating penalties.
Energy Savings ConnectedLoad 1,000 1,000 Peak Demand Savings ConnectedLoad Energy Savings ConnectedLoad CF 1,000 Where: PPre = power of existing equipment, W. PPost = power of new equipment, W. QTYPre = quantity...
AI summary The document provides formulas for calculating energy and peak demand savings from connected loads, using pre- and post-installation equipment parameters. It describes the process of verifying existing and new lighting systems, including the use of spare equipment, specifications, and invoices to determine wattage and fixture details.
priate type and size of the cooling system were applied. The total energy savings for lighting projects was the combination of the connected load energy savings and cooling interactive energy savings. Lighting Results A summary of lighting...
AI summary The evaluation of lighting projects from the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs shows that total energy savings were 514.9 MWh with a realization rate of 104%. Variations in operating hours significantly affected savings estimates, with some sites showing decreases and others increases. Interactive effects also influenced the savings calculations.
kW savings of 75.5. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 13 Table 3-3: Lighting Savings Results Evaluated Savings Tracking Peak Demand Project # Savings (MWh) Energy (MWh) (kW) K-07 5.8 2.1 1.4 K-09 13.0 4.8 0.5 K-10 0....
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on lighting and motor/drive savings. Table 3-3 summarizes the savings from various projects, with total energy savings of 514.9 MWh and peak demand savings of 75.5 kW. The analysis discusses the use of variable frequency drives (VFDs) for motor efficiency, highlighting the methodology for calculating energy savings.
Flow0 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 14 Where: Ppre = input power of existing equipment for each flow bin, watts. Ppost = input power of new equipment for each flow bin, watts. HoursPre = annual operating hours o...
AI summary The document evaluates 2010 prescriptive rebate programs by calculating energy savings from motor upgrades. It details formulas for determining input power before and after equipment replacement, including assumptions about motor efficiency and operating conditions. All sampled projects used constant speed motors without flow control.
ews. All three of the sampled projects had constant speed motors with no flow control mechanism. 6 Electric Power Research Institute, Adjustable Speed Drives Directory, Table 3.1, p18, 1991 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Progra...
AI summary The document discusses sampled projects with constant speed motors lacking flow control mechanisms and references a table from the Electric Power Research Institute's Adjustable Speed Drives Directory from 1991.
Table 3.1, p18, 1991 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 15
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on their effectiveness and outcomes. It provides insights into the programs' impact and performance in the context of energy efficiency initiatives.
8 25 100 56 68 6 20 100 51 64 5 Each of the projects had unique operating conditions. Data collection was limited by control system software and the knowledge of the staff. Equipment schedules and load profiles were collected. For one proj...
AI summary The document discusses the unique operating conditions of VFD projects, highlighting data collection limitations and discrepancies in motor sizes. It notes that savings estimates were higher than expected due to differences in baseline operating hours and actual motor usage.
luation found the baseline operating hours to be much higher than the program had estimated for one of the motors. With the installation of VFDs, the motors ran for less time and at a reduced load. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebat...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 prescriptive rebate programs highlights discrepancies in baseline operating hours and energy savings estimates, particularly in projects involving VFD installations. The use of VFDs led to reduced motor operating hours and lower load, resulting in higher savings than initially projected.
vely. The demand savings factor for supply and return fans were 0.173 kW/hp and 0.263 kW/hp, respectively. The commissioning factor was 1.05, since the equipment was calibrated by an engineering firm. Table 3-5: Motor and Drive Savings Res...
AI summary The text provides data on motor and drive savings results, including demand savings factors and commissioning factors. It lists evaluated savings for various projects, with project K-12 noted as having savings assessed over the phone.
205.5 205.5 35.5 Total 248.1 345.2 47.7 Savings assessed over the phone 3.2.3 HVAC Savings Analysis Four HVAC projects were visited and evaluated. Each of these sites had new high efficiency air-source heat pumps installed. These heat pump...
AI summary The evaluation of HVAC projects with high-efficiency air-source heat pumps shows energy savings through improved efficiency. Adjustments were made to the program's methodology, including using actual SEER and HSPF values instead of minimum qualifying values and considering both heating and cooling capacities for savings calculations.
1 1 1,000 SEER Pre SEER Post 1 Energy Savings H QTYCapacityH EFLH H 1 1 1,000 HSPFPre HSPFPost 1 Peak Demand Savings Winter QTYCapacityH CF 1 1 1,000 HSPFPre HS...
AI summary The text presents mathematical formulas for calculating energy savings and peak demand savings related to heating systems, using metrics such as SEER, HSPF, and capacity factors. These calculations are likely used in energy efficiency evaluations or program assessments.
1 1 1,000 HSPFPre HSPFPost Energy Savings Energy Savings C Energy Savings H Where: QTY = quantity of units installed, n CapacityC = rated cooling capacity, BTU/hr EFLHC = Annual equivalent full load cooling hours, hr/ y...
AI summary The document provides a formula for calculating energy savings from HVAC unit replacements, using parameters such as cooling and heating capacities, efficiency ratios, and full load hours. It references baseline efficiency values and program-specific assumptions used in the evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs.
HVAC savings from this program were greater than that assumed in the tracking system. The tracked HVAC savings was 8,386 kWh, while our evaluated savings was 11,779 kWh, or a 140.5% realization rate. Table 3-6: HVAC Savings Results Evaluat...
AI summary The evaluation of the BER program found that HVAC savings were higher than initially tracked, with a 140.5% realization rate. The program's overall savings at the generator level were estimated at 932.0 MWh and 134.8 kW in peak demand.
ed or contacted as part of the evaluation, these results represent the entire population of 2010 participants. Our gross estimate of savings at the generator was 932.0 MWh and 134.8 kW in peak demand. Table 3-7: Evaluated Program Savings E...
AI summary The evaluated program savings from 2010 participants show a total of 791.8 MWh in energy savings and 126.1 kW in peak demand reduction at the meter level, with corresponding savings of 932.0 MWh and 134.8 kW at the generator level. The savings are categorized under lighting, motors and drives, and HVAC.
(14,670), the watts reduced per ballast system (5) and the assumed hours per year (3,400).9 The estimated savings associated with 2-lamp T8F32 ballasts sold was, therefore, determined to be 249.4 MWh.
AI summary The text calculates the estimated energy savings from the installation of 2-lamp T8F32 ballasts, based on the number of units sold, watts reduced per system, and assumed annual operating hours, resulting in an estimated saving of 249.4 MWh.
Table 4-2: Ballast and Bulb System Savings Summary Watts Energy Savings Replacing T12F34 Lamp System… Ballasts Lamps Reduced (MWh) … of 30 Watts with 1-Lamp… HPT8F32 (27 Watts) 1,295 1,295 3 13.2 HPT8F28 (24 Watts) 2,500 2,500 6 51.0 HPT8F...
AI summary Table 4-2 presents the energy savings from replacing traditional T12F34 lamp systems with more efficient HPT8F32, HPT8F28, and HPT8F25 systems, showing reductions in watts and corresponding energy savings in MWh across various configurations.
12 50 34 1.4 Total 66,407 164,205 N/A 2,698.3 The baseline for lamps sold separately from ballasts was T8F32 fixtures with electronic ballasts. This assumed baseline was predicated on the belief that a customer purchasing lamps without bal...
AI summary The text discusses the baseline assumptions used in the evaluation of 2010 prescriptive rebate programs, focusing on lamp sales and energy savings calculations. It assumes that lamps sold separately from ballasts were used with existing electronic ballasts and estimates energy savings based on lamp wattage reductions and annual operating hours.
l of the savings associated with ballasts and lamp systems and the savings associated with lamp-only sales in 2010 was, therefore, estimated to be 2,698 MWh plus 1,024 MWh, or 3,722 MWh at the meter. 4.2 Impact Evaluation Methodology To pe...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from lighting technologies in 2010, estimating total savings at 3,722 MWh. It outlines the impact evaluation methodology, including the use of installation rates, delta watts, and hours of use, as well as site visits and analysis of prior evaluations.
the savings for the SLC program. These totals matched within reason, indicating that the quantities tracked matched the data provided on a monthly basis to program administrators by the distributors. 4.2.2 Installation Rates At the nine si...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility Board evaluated the installation rates of the SLC program in 2010, finding a weighted installation rate of 89.8% based on site visits, and combined it with a 2009 survey result of 96.3% to arrive at an average estimate of 93% for the installation rate.
I Custom 2009 and 2010 14,644 66% 32% Weighted Average N/A 24,724 58.6% 19.1% Table 4-4: HVAC Efficiencies Fixtures in Fixtures in Electric Cooling Electric Heating Heating Program Year Sample Cooling COP Sample Efficiency Smart Lighting C...
AI summary The document presents data on HVAC efficiencies and lighting programs, including metrics such as cooling COP and electric heating efficiency for various initiatives like Smart Lighting Choices and Efficient Products - Direct Install. It also outlines formulas used to calculate cooling savings and heating penalties based on fixture performance.
r is the average annual operation of all fixtures installed. % coincident cooling is the percentage of total annual lighting hours that the cooling equipment operates. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 30 Average...
AI summary The text provides definitions and formulas related to the evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, including terms such as average COP, winter waste heat factor, and efficiency of heating and cooling equipment. These metrics are used to calculate energy savings and performance.
Sampling Error at 90% Population Sample Size (n) Confidence Interval Participants 2010 30 11 +20.1% 5.2 Program Goals and Design The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program was a new addition to the DSM Administrator‘s portfolio of energy eff...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebate (BER) program, launched in mid-2010, provided financial incentives for businesses to purchase energy-efficient equipment. It was modeled after successful programs like Efficiency Vermont and aimed to increase market penetration of efficient technologies and raise customer awareness of energy-efficient products.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 36
AI summary This document evaluates the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs, focusing on their implementation and effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency.
Respondents participated in the program for a variety of reasons. The most frequently cited reason was to save on energy costs, with six respondents citing this as their most important motivation and three citing it as their second most im...
AI summary Respondents participated in the program primarily to save on energy costs, with environmental concerns and ease of process also cited as motivations. Program incentives were not the primary motivation for any respondents.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 37 Respondents were also asked why they had decided to install energy efficient equipment. Table 5-6 shows respondents‘ most and second most important motivations by type of equipm...
AI summary Respondents cited saving on energy bills as the most common motivation for installing energy-efficient equipment, with additional motivations including improving lighting conditions, reducing maintenance costs, and taking advantage of program incentives.
by one respondent). Other motivations for respondents who had installed HVAC equipment included reducing maintenance costs, taking advantage of program incentives, and reducing their carbon footprint. Table 5-6: Importance of Motivations f...
AI summary Respondents who installed HVAC equipment were motivated by reducing maintenance costs, taking advantage of program incentives, and reducing their carbon footprint. The table highlights the importance of these motivations for product installation.
2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 38 Nearly all of the respondents (ten out of eleven) reported that they had experienced no barriers to participating in the BER program. The one respondent who had reported facing...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs indicates that nearly all respondents faced no barriers to participating in the BER program, with only one respondent citing delays in eligibility determination. The section also discusses free-ridership and spillover effects, examining participants' pre-program intentions and post-program energy-efficient actions.
8 No Don‘t know 1 1 Respondents rated the influence of various aspects of the BER program on their decision to participate in the program on a scale from one (―not at all influential‖) to five (―very influential‖). Information, services, o...
AI summary Respondents evaluated the influence of various aspects of the BER program on their participation. Information and advice from contractors and NSPI representatives were the most influential, while rebates and program information were only moderately influential.
1 3 1 3 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 40 5.6.2 Spillover When respondents were asked whether they had installed any additional equipment of the type they had installed through the BER program (i.e., additional li...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs found that respondents did not install additional equipment of the same type as those covered by the BER program. However, three respondents reported being influenced to take other energy efficiency actions, such as installing HVAC upgrades and occupancy sensors.
n influenced to take additional actions including installing HVAC upgrades, energy efficient lighting, and occupancy sensors.12 Table 5-13: Influence of Program on Additional Energy Efficiency Actions Program Influenced Additional Actions...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of a program on additional energy efficiency actions, with three respondents reporting actions such as HVAC upgrades, energy-efficient lighting, and occupancy sensors. These actions were not completed by 2010 and were included in the 2010 process evaluation but excluded from the impact evaluation.
from the 2010 impact evaluation. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 41 5.7 Energy Attitudes and Importance As shown in Table 5-14, all of the respondents indicated that managing energy was important to their business....
AI summary The evaluation indicates that all respondents consider energy management important to their business, with energy usage reduction and cost management rated highly. Most respondents reported energy costs as a small portion of their annual budget, except for one respondent whose energy costs constituted 60% of their operating budget.
5.8 Satisfaction and Program Improvement Suggestions The majority of respondents were satisfied with the program. On a scale from one (―not at all satisfied‖) to five (―very satisfied‖), eight out of the eleven respondents gave a rating of...
AI summary Most respondents were satisfied with the BER program, rating it four or five out of five. However, rebate amounts were a point of dissatisfaction, with some participants feeling the incentives were insufficient. One participant suggested that LED parking lot lighting rebates should be increased to $300 to $400 to better cover costs.
5= ‘very satisfied’ and 1 = ‘not at all satisfied’ Aspect of program n 5 4 3 2 1 DK NA Program overall 11 3 5 3 Program application, forms and paperwork 11 3 3 4 1 Interaction and communication with staff 11 6 1 2 2 Availability of NSP sta...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer satisfaction with a program, including aspects like application processes, staff interaction, and rebate amounts. It also mentions that nearly all respondents indicated a high likelihood of purchasing energy-efficient products in the future.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs Page 44 Concomitantly, there was a wide range of building floor space reported by the respondents. Two out of eleven respondents reported having facilities with less than 5,000 square f...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Prescriptive Rebate Programs highlights the variability in building floor space and number of employees among respondents. Two respondents had facilities under 5,000 square feet, while two had over 100,000 square feet. Employee numbers also varied significantly, with three respondents having fewer than 10 employees and two having 100 or more.
1. Outside design professional 2. Contractor 3. Manufacturer representative 4. Utility account manager 5. Someone within your company / organization 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Refused) [ASK V7/V8 FOR EACH MEASURE CATEGORY VERFIED IN V1 – V5; V1...
AI summary The text outlines a survey methodology used to gather information on factors motivating companies to install energy-efficient equipment across various categories, such as lighting, motors, and HVAC. It includes response options and instructions for data collection, focusing on program incentives, cost savings, and other motivations.
E] 99. (Refused) – [CONTINUE] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program Page A7 FREE-RIDERSHIP [FR series] [ASK EACH QUESTION IN THIS SECTION FOR EACH MEASURE CATEGORY VERIFIED IN V1 –V5] FR1. Did your company / organization ha...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to free-ridership evaluation for the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program. It asks participants whether they had plans to install energy-efficient equipment prior to the program and how their actions would have differed without the rebate incentives.
cility open? [998 = Don’t know, 999 = Refused] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program Page A14 F5. Is your company independent, or part of a larger company? 1. Independent 2. Part of a larger company 98. (Don‘t know) 99. (Re...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide used to evaluate the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program by NMR Group, Inc. The guide includes questions about company independence, number of facilities in Nova Scotia, and interactions with Nova Scotia Power's energy efficiency programs. The evaluation focuses on free-ridership and spillover effects.
ebate Program Page A16 5. In general, how often do you interact with NSPI energy efficiency program staff? Who do you interact with at NSPI? a. What types of interactions do you typically have with NSPI staff? [Probe: status calls, meeting...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to interactions with NSPI energy efficiency program staff, the use of design professionals in project scoping, and the delivery process of the C&I Custom and BER programs. It focuses on participant experiences and perceived barriers to program participation.
t pose a barrier to participation in the C&I Custom program? [Probes: Assistance, availability, or interaction with program staff; requirements of any of the four-steps;] The BER program was designed to streamline the rebate process for C&...
AI summary The document discusses the Business Energy Rebate (BER) program, highlighting its streamlined rebate process for C&I customers implementing specific energy efficiency measures. It also explores participants' experiences, identifying potential barriers and motivations for participation, such as paperwork and the importance of rebates and environmental concerns.
cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at understanding the experiences and challenges of participants in NSPI rebate programs, including barriers to participation, issues encountered, and satisfaction levels with various programs and interactions with NSPI staff.
ith NSPI staff [Does this vary by program at all?] e. Project implementation f. Rebate amounts [Does this vary by program at all?] g. Measurement and verification h. Application, rebate/incentive and associated paperwork [Does this vary by...
AI summary The text includes questions about energy efficiency programs administered by NSPI, focusing on rebate implementation, project execution, and free-ridership. It also asks respondents about their plans and actions regarding energy efficiency upgrades in the absence of NSPI incentives.
2 3 4 5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures...
AI summary The text asks respondents to consider energy-efficient equipment or upgrades their company has installed or is pursuing, and whether these measures are similar to those covered by NSPI rebate programs. It also inquires about the location of installations, whether the upgrades are being implemented through NSPI programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010.
t measures and processes; or the NMR Evaluation of 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program Page A20 savings could be from PLANNED OR END-OF-LIFE replacements and installations of higher efficiency rather than standard efficiency measures and p...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Business Energy Rebate Program, focusing on energy savings from efficiency measures and the influence of the program on participants' decisions. It also includes questions about the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to organizations.
Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... I IMPACT EVALUATION FINDINGS ................................................
AI summary The document provides an executive summary and key findings of an impact evaluation related to a program, focusing on the description of the program, methodology for evaluating savings, and specific sections on lighting and traffic lighting.
........................ 11 2.6.4 Combining Scores and Weighting ......................................................................................................... 12 2.7 NET-TO-GROSS RATIO .............................................
AI summary The text outlines the methodology for evaluating a program, including scoring and weighting, net-to-gross ratio, energy savings estimation, and process evaluation through interviews, surveys, and data tracking. It also touches on program goals, free-ridership assessment, and outreach strategies.
nt programs. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page II close to achieving its one-year energy savings goal of 20,000 MWh but fell notably short of reaching its demand target of 3,410 kW. As energy savings were close to targets but...
AI summary The 2010 C&I Custom Program nearly met its energy savings target but fell short of its demand savings goal. NMR recommends adapting the program to include incentives for demand response and load shifting. The launch of the Business Energy Rebate program in 2010 helped streamline processes. A new Sales Lead position was introduced in 2010, leading to increased participation and savings. A second Sales Lead was added in 2011 to support higher program goals.
rmance in: o Building envelopes; o Lighting; o HVAC; o Power systems; o Controls; o Design guidance; o Verification. This document reports the results of the evaluation of the C&I Custom program. Although the C&I New Construction program l...
AI summary The document evaluates the performance of the C&I Custom program in areas such as building envelopes, lighting, HVAC, power systems, and controls. It notes that the C&I New Construction program did not have completed projects in 2010 and that two projects were included in the C&I Custom evaluation. The program manager confirmed the logic model in the C&I Custom program manual is correct.
action of installations performed and their associated savings. The total installed savings for the 2010 projects was 22,758 MWh of energy savings and 2,805 kW of peak demand savings at the generator. Table 2-1: Tracking Estimates of 2010...
AI summary The text presents data on energy and peak demand savings from 2010 C&I custom installations, including lighting retrofits, HVAC upgrades, and other technologies. A total of 22,758 MWh of energy savings and 2,805 kW of peak demand savings were achieved across 102 projects.
nistrator did not include the M&V data. For more information on the on-site activities performed at this facility, as well as a synopsis of the motor data collected while on site, refer to Appendix A. 2.3.4 Comprehensive “Whole Building” S...
AI summary The 2010 sample included a newly constructed facility characterized as a whole building energy efficiency project, incorporating HVAC, insulation, and lighting measures. A building simulation modeling approach was used to evaluate savings, with on-site data collection focused on occupancy schedules, lighting, HVAC set points, and facility plans.
e, where some revisions to the inputs and the savings approach caused the savings to go down approximately 14%. This, among other factors, contributed to the relatively lower realization rate in 2010. Table 2-5: Comparison of 2008, 2009 an...
AI summary The realization rates for energy efficiency programs were 107% in 2008, 110% in 2009, and 95% in 2010. The lower 2010 rate was due to revisions in inputs and savings approaches, which caused a 14% drop in savings.
Customer was unable to raise the needed capital Project was a lost opportunity. For example, a customer had to upgrade equipment but could not buy a more energy-efficient option.
AI summary The customer was unable to secure the necessary capital to invest in energy-efficient equipment, resulting in a missed opportunity to upgrade and improve energy efficiency.
members to the program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page 19 One of the 2010 participants said they had participated in another energy efficiency program in 2009 but had been unable to provide a description of the program. (Ta...
AI summary The document discusses the 2010 C&I Custom Program, noting that some participants had previously participated in energy efficiency programs, though descriptions of these programs were not always available. One participant mentioned being in a 2009 program but could not describe it.
Descriptions Electric water heating program Description na Don‘t know (1) (1) 3.5 Participation Motivations and Barriers When asked their primary reason for participating in the C&I Custom program, the majority of 2010 respondents reported...
AI summary The 2010 C&I Custom Program saw participants primarily motivated by financial benefits, such as saving on energy costs and receiving program incentives. A significant portion also cited environmental motivations, such as reducing their carbon footprint and protecting the environment.
nt Important Important Save on energy/energy costs 45% 36% 50% 36% 69% Incentives 36 8 9 15 8 Part of existing retrofit efforts 9 8 Help protect the environment 9 25 9 8 17 Reduce maintenance costs 17 Reduce carbon footprint 17 See what wa...
AI summary The text presents survey data on reasons for implementing energy efficiency measures, with a focus on saving on energy costs and incentives. It highlights the importance of reducing energy costs, protecting the environment, and improving lighting conditions as key motivations. A significant percentage of respondents also indicated they did not know the reasons for implementing these measures.
t Important Important Important Important Important Save on energy/energy costs 64% 36% 64% 9% 85% 0% Incentives 9 8 8 Reduce maintenance costs 9 9 23 Reduce carbon footprint 9 15 Improve existing lighting conditions 9 9 36 8 Help protect...
AI summary The table highlights the importance of energy efficiency and cost-saving initiatives among participants, with a significant percentage prioritizing energy savings and incentives. It also shows varying levels of interest in reducing maintenance costs, carbon footprints, and improving lighting conditions.
principles behind the project Lack of personnel 15 Payback timeframe 8 Contract language 8 Consultant error 8 Complicated communication 8 Legal issues 8 Don‘t know 36 23 31 These are not program-related barriers. 3.6 Implemented Measures T...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to project implementation, including lack of personnel, payback timeframe, contract language, consultant error, and communication issues. It also notes that a significant portion of respondents implemented energy efficiency measures, particularly lighting retrofits through the C&I Custom program, while some measures like refrigeration and solar were not implemented by surveyed participants.
Table 3-7: Additional Purchases of Energy Efficiency Equipment 2008 Respondents 2009 Respondents 2010 Respondents Sample size 11 13 13 Additional energy efficiency measures 27% 23% 15% Additional feasibility studies 18 39 8 Have not pursue...
AI summary The table presents data on the additional purchases of energy efficiency equipment by respondents in 2008, 2009, and 2010, highlighting the percentage of respondents who pursued additional energy efficiency measures and the types of equipment they acquired.
Utility account manager 9 8 Don‘t know 7 8 3.9 Firmographics Respondents were asked to rate the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to their organization on a scale of one to five, where one equaled ‗not at all im...
AI summary The survey highlights that 92% of 2010 respondents found reducing energy usage and managing energy costs very or somewhat important to their organization. Energy costs accounted for an average of 37% of annual operating budgets, with 81% of respondents reporting energy costs made up 20% or more of their budgets.
respondents (81%) reported that energy costs accounted for 20% or more of their annual operating budgets. On average, energy costs accounted for 37% of annual operating budgets for respondents. Table 3-11: Energy Costs as a Percent of Annu...
AI summary The text highlights that energy costs make up a significant portion of annual operating budgets for respondents, with 81% reporting that energy costs accounted for 20% or more. On average, energy costs accounted for 37% of annual operating budgets for respondents in 2010.
^ Y ra NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A2 Project ID: C-4142145-1 1.0 Facility Overview This is a grocery distribution warehouse. The main areas of the facility include offices, loading docks, and extensive warehouse floor s...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from a 2010 C&I Custom Program project at a grocery distribution warehouse. New lighting systems were installed, resulting in energy and demand savings. Savings were recalculated after a site visit, and evaluated savings were 6.9% less than tracking savings.
Generator savings are customer savings plus a 7.01% scale factor to account for transmission and distribution losses. The evaluated energy savings were ultimately 6.9% less than the tracking savings. Table 1: Summary of Tracking and Evalua...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from lighting projects, comparing tracking and evaluated savings. It includes tables showing differences between customer and generator savings, with a 7.01% scale factor applied to account for transmission and distribution losses. The project overview mentions installed fixtures and their quantities and wattages.
107 48 T8 6 50 T8 296 97 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A3 Table 3: Summary of Removed Fixtures Fixture Type Quantity Fixt. Wattage 250W HPS 347V 126 295 400W HPS 347V 221 465 400W MH 347V 5 450 T12 1 4 120V 6 45 T12 2 4 12...
AI summary This table summarizes the fixtures removed as part of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, including the type, quantity, and wattage of each fixture removed.
The project had not been completed at the time of the site visit. Twenty seven HID fixtures were still in place across different areas of the warehouse and loading dock areas. Safe access to the fixtures was the primary reason for partial...
AI summary The project was not fully completed during the site visit, with 27 HID fixtures still in place. The installation contractor returned after the visit and finished the work. Tables 2 and 3 summarize equipment reviewed, but baseline fixtures were removed during installation, making it difficult to confirm pre-existing conditions. Installed fixtures include 6-lamp T8 and T8 designations, replacing HID lighting in high-bay areas.
tures were inventoried in offices and hallways. Two-lamp and four-lamp fixtures were also present. Conversions from eight-foot T12 can include two or four T8 lamps installed in the eight foot troffer. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...
AI summary The document describes the process of inventorying lighting fixtures and calculating energy savings from a lighting retrofit. Fixtures were categorized by type and location, and savings were calculated based on wattage differences and annual operating hours.
Page A4 where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1000 = Wh to kWh conversion factor. No loggers were insta...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations from a lighting retrofit project, including direct lighting savings and interactive cooling savings. It outlines formulas used for calculation and mentions that no loggers were installed to monitor operating hours, though values were reviewed with facility personnel and retained for evaluation.
d at 33% of the annual lighting operating hours. A heat gain factor of 0.208 was used in the spreadsheet. An electric heating penalty was not assessed for this facility as it is heated by #2 fuel oil. 5.0 On-Site Methodology A detailed lig...
AI summary The document details on-site methodology and observations from the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It outlines the inventory of lighting systems, the use of #2 fuel oil for heating, and discrepancies in wattage ratings for fixtures that affected savings calculations.
lculations also used incorrect wattage for one fixture type. The 250-Watt high pressure sodium fixtures were rated at 465-Watts in the baseline system. This was changed to 295-Watts in the evaluation. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program at a hardware store facility shows that annual energy savings were 93.1% of tracking savings, with variances attributed to fixture quantity reductions and modifications. Customer and generator demand savings were lower than expected, but interactive cooling contributed additional savings.
to 8 PM Thursday through Friday, 8 AM to 6 PM Saturday, and 10 AM to 5 PM Sunday. Employees typically arrive and leave the facility 15 minutes before opening and 30 minutes after closing respectively. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document outlines a lighting renovation project at a facility, including energy and demand savings from the retrofit. Customer savings were 25% less than tracking savings, and generator savings were adjusted to account for transmission and distribution losses. The project involved replacing high-wattage lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient alternatives.
ows: Replace 2L 4‘ T12 (120W) and 2L 8‘ T12 (68W) fixtures with 2L (48W) and 4L (98W) low wattage T8 fixtures. Replace metal halide (457W) fixtures with 6L T8 (221W) high bay fixtures. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tra...
AI summary The document outlines a lighting retrofit project involving replacing high-wattage T12 fixtures with lower-wattage T8 fixtures. Savings from the retrofit were calculated using a spreadsheet-based approach, splitting the lighting retrofit into groups of lights installed in various areas of the store and calculating savings based on wattage differences and annual operating hours.
(n preiWprei n postiWposti )h ES i 1000 (1) where, ES = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Store area i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh to kWh...
AI summary The document calculates energy savings from a lighting retrofit project using a formula that includes factors like the number of fixtures, wattage, and annual operating hours. It also discusses on-site verification of fixture installations and discrepancies in quantities between the application and on-site findings.
ed those listed in the application. The quantities, however, were slightly different. Table 2 below compares the fixtures found on-site with the fixtures specified in the tracking savings analysis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...
AI summary The text compares the number of fixtures found on-site with those specified in the tracking savings analysis for the 2010 C&I Custom Program. There are slight discrepancies in the counts for certain areas, such as the basement and renovation area.
24 2L T8 4' 28W 0 1 Main Entry 6L T8 4' 28W 16 16 The site contact was able to explain the presence of two additional 4L fixtures in the basement. He stated that after the project had been completed, the lighting levels were still too low...
AI summary The document discusses discrepancies in lighting fixtures installed at a site, with two additional 4L fixtures added in the basement due to low lighting levels. Amperage data collected during the implementation of the M&V process was reviewed, revealing that not all lights on a circuit turned on simultaneously, and that some circuits may serve non-lighting loads.
was assumed based on the site contact‘s claim that the store is open continuously during the peak period. Peak demand savings for all lighting areas were summed to generate gross peak demand savings. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings w...
AI summary The analysis shows that annual energy savings were 74.5% of the tracking savings due to discrepancies in fixture counts, improper logger data usage, and rounding of baseline values. Peak demand savings were 140.2% of the tracking estimate, largely due to outdated tracking system data and differences in peak coincidence factors between analyses.
lly predicted primarily because the load weighted average peak coincidence factor using in the evaluation analysis (.96) was larger than the peak coincidence factor using in the M&V analysis (.75). NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...
AI summary The document evaluates a 2010 C&I Custom Program lighting retrofit project, highlighting the installation across six buildings and the recalculated energy and demand savings. The evaluated savings were 4.7% higher than the tracked savings, considering a 4.1% scale factor for transmission and distribution losses.
2 lamp T8 88 64 Stores 6 lamp T8 17 192 Total 851 208.5 Avg kW NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A13
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, providing data on lamp usage and energy consumption, including metrics such as average kW and total usage across different locations.
851 208.5 Avg kW NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A13 Table 3: Summary of Removed Fixtures Fixture Type Quantity Fixt. Wattage 3 Plant #1 T12(4) 20 75 3 Plant #1 T12(2) 26 75 4 Halfway River T12 8' 14 173 4 Halfway River T12...
AI summary The table summarizes the removal of various lighting fixtures across multiple locations, including the number of fixtures, their wattage, and the total average kW. This data is likely used for evaluating the impact of energy efficiency programs.
4 290 Hillaton N.S. 150HPS 4 175 Total 813 334.1 Avg kW Fixture types and wattages for the pre-existing fixtures were taken at face value since pre-existing fixtures were unavailable for verification at the time of the evaluation-site visi...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a lighting retrofit project, including fixture types, wattages, and savings calculations. Pre-existing fixtures were not verified, and the total connected load was 177.4 kW. Savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach based on differences in wattage and annual operating hours.
(1) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A14 where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh...
AI summary The evaluation discusses the energy savings from a lighting retrofit in a commercial and industrial (C&I) custom program. It includes equations for calculating direct savings and interactive cooling savings, noting reduced waste heat and lower cooling costs. Data from loggers and pivot tables were used to verify operating hours and savings claims.
ghting savings [kWh] = Heat gain factor (fraction of the lighting energy assumed to become a load on the space) = Seasonality factor (fraction of the year assumed to require cooling) = Coefficient of performance of the cooling system. A he...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from lighting efficiency improvements in commercial and industrial settings. It discusses factors such as heat gain, cooling seasonality, and coefficient of performance, and how they affect cooling and heating loads. It also mentions peak demand savings and the impact of interactive refrigeration and heating effects.
to demand savings. The cooling equipment operated with a reduced load due to the reduction in waste heat. The electric resistance heating operated at slightly greater loads, affecting demand savings. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The installatio...
AI summary The text describes the on-site methodology used to assess energy savings from new lighting equipment and other systems. It includes discussions with site personnel, verification of baseline assumptions, and inventory checks to ensure accuracy in tracking energy savings.
xtures according to general usage along with the fixture type. Annual lighting operation was also obtained for each location. The savings re-creation spreadsheet was populated from the collected data. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The document details on-site observations of lighting fixtures and cooling/refrigeration equipment at a facility, noting discrepancies in fixture counts and inefficiencies in cooling systems. The cooling calculations use a low COP value, which may not reflect actual equipment performance. Interactive heating penalties are also mentioned due to electric resistance heating in certain areas.
pe. Interactive heating and cooling effects added 4.7 kW to peak demand savings. The 1.040 loss adjustment factor was applied to the interactive demand savings to estimate generator demand savings. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...
AI summary The document describes a new fire hall and civic center facility in rural Nova Scotia, including its layout, usage patterns, and occupancy schedules. The facility includes offices, training rooms, and other spaces, with varying levels of occupancy depending on the day and time.
er holds parties, weddings, remembrance services, seminars, and other events. A typical weekend event runs from 4 PM on Saturday to 1 AM on Sunday. The civic center is generally unoccupied on Sundays. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The project involved three energy-saving measures: occupancy sensors in washrooms and the fire hall, high-efficiency ground source heat pumps, and increased insulation. Savings were recalculated using updated energy models, showing 1.6% more gross evaluated energy savings than tracking savings.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A18 Table 1: Summary of Tracking and Evaluation Savings Results Customer Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 4224 1800 -2424 0.5 0.0 -0.5 HVAC 1...
AI summary The document presents a comparison of customer savings and generator savings from the 2010 C&I Custom Program, showing discrepancies between tracking and evaluated results across lighting, HVAC, and insulation categories.
3.6 -17.5 Insulation 57,894 7,031 -50,863 6.7 0.1 -6.6 Total 247,408 251,470 4,062 28.4 3.7 -24.7 3.0 Project Overview As mentioned in Section 2.0, this project consisted of lighting, HVAC, and building shell measures. The lighting compone...
AI summary The project involved lighting, HVAC, and building shell measures. Key components included occupancy sensors for lighting and two ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs) for heating and cooling. The baseline conditions were based on 1997 MNEC requirements, with packaged rooftop AC units and electric resistance baseboards for heating.
the installed and base cases consisted of identical sensible heat recovery ventilators. Exhaust fans and ventilation requirements were also consistent between the installed and baseline conditions. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from insulation improvements at a facility, comparing baseline and installed conditions. The installed insulation achieved higher R-values than required, and savings were calculated using building energy modeling software.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A21 where, = HVAC Energy Savings [kWh] = Month = Baseline building monthly cooling loads [kBtu] = Baseline building monthly heating loads [kBtu] = Installed building monthly cooling loads [kBt...
AI summary This section evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program by calculating HVAC energy savings using baseline and installed building cooling and heating loads, along with energy efficiency ratings and performance coefficients.
ving the ground loop, hot water loop, and chilled water loop. Other plan details, such as the locations of HRVs and fan coils, were also verified to ensure that the building would be modeled properly. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The document describes on-site observations and findings related to the installation of heat pumps, occupancy sensors, and other systems in a building. The evaluation includes verification of installed systems and the collection of data to construct a new energy model.
center is typically occupied by a single part time employee from 1 PM to 5 PM, Monday through Friday. A walking club occasionally uses the civic center for two mornings each week; NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A24 howev...
AI summary The document describes the usage patterns and energy management practices at a civic center. The facility is occupied by a part-time employee during weekdays and used for events on weekends. Lighting and HVAC systems are only activated during occupied hours, with specific temperature set points maintained in different areas.
modeling approach was necessary because DOE2 does not allow in-slab heating in zones with air side equipment; only baseboard heating is permitted in zones with airside equipment. Even though the dynamics of a GSHP based heating strategy co...
AI summary The text discusses a modeling approach used to evaluate energy efficiency measures, including insulation and occupancy sensors, using eQuest. The model compared baseline and as-built scenarios to estimate annual energy and peak demand savings, with a focus on heating and cooling systems in buildings.
eekdays) were averaged. The final step in the evaluation analysis was assessing the proportions of project savings attributable to each measure. Lighting savings were calculated first on the basis of the difference between the lighting ene...
AI summary The evaluation analysis assessed the proportion of energy savings attributable to different measures in a project. Lighting savings were calculated based on energy consumption differences between base and as-built models. For HVAC and insulation measures, independent model runs were conducted to isolate their effects, revealing that heat pumps accounted for 97.9% of savings, while insulation contributed 2.1%.
lation measure was responsible for the other 2.1%. These percentages were then multiplied by the gross annual savings (less lighting savings) to estimate savings directly attributable to each measure. 7.0 Conclusions When assessed in the a...
AI summary The project achieved energy savings slightly above the tracking estimate, primarily due to higher HVAC system efficiency, though insulation savings were lower than expected, contributing to a reduced overall impact.
king analysis. The primary culprit NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A26 was likely the use of lower wall and roofing R-values in the tracking baseline model than those proposed in the feasibility study. As documented previous...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that lower insulation R-values in the baseline model led to overestimation of energy savings. Lighting controls savings could not be assessed due to an unknown calculation method, and peak demand savings were only 13% of projections due to low occupancy during peak hours.
d period. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A27 Project ID: C-276-166-9 1.0 Facility Overview Changes in refrigeration controls and operation were implemented in 19 convenience stores in this project. These are small individua...
AI summary This document evaluates energy savings from refrigeration control upgrades in 19 convenience stores. New controls regulate evaporator fans and anti-condensate heaters based on temperature and humidity. Outside air dampers were also installed in 10 locations to reduce compressor use. Savings are calculated with a 7.1% scale factor for transmission and distribution losses.
e. Generator savings are customer savings plus a 7.1% scale factor to account for transmission and distribution losses. There is no variance between the evaluated energy savings and tracking savings. Table 1: Summary of Tracking and Evalua...
AI summary The text discusses generator savings, which are calculated as customer savings plus a 7.1% scale factor for transmission and distribution losses. The evaluated energy savings and tracking savings are shown to be consistent across different categories, with no variance reported.
0 27.0 27.0 0.0 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A28 Project Overview Table 2 provides a list of the refrigeration equipment by location. These fans, compressors, and door heaters operate with the beverage coolers in the stor...
AI summary The document provides an overview of a project evaluating the 2010 C&I Custom Program, specifically detailing refrigeration equipment in Truro and Bedford. It includes technical specifications such as volts, amps, phase, number of units, and COP for various equipment types.
1 1 1 2.5 Condenser Fan 240 2.2 1 1 2 Door Heaters 120 8 1 1 4 Dartmouth Fans or Equipment Volts Amps Phase # of Units Doors/Unit COP Evaporators 120 6 1 2 3 Compressor 240 30.7 1 1 1 2.5 Condenser Fan 240 3 1 1 2 Door Heaters 120 5.53 1 1...
AI summary The document presents technical data on equipment specifications for evaporators, compressors, condenser fans, and door heaters in different locations, including voltage, amperage, and COP. It also notes the installation of evaporator fan and door humidity controls in all four locations and free cooling in Truro and Dartmouth.
nstalled in Truro and Dartmouth. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A29 Table 3: Summary of Controlled Refrigeration Equipment Installed Measures Evaporator Fan Door Heater Outside Air Location Control Control Cooling Truro Y Y...
AI summary The document presents a table summarizing the installation of controlled refrigeration equipment across various locations, including Truro, Bedford, Dartmouth, and Halifax, with details on specific installed measures.
ed 1,512 annual reduction in operation. New air fans are installed in the cooler to move the outside air. The power consumption of 0.17 kW is set for these fans. The 0.17 kW is multiplied by the reduction in operating hours to account for...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from installing new air fans and anti-condensate heater controls in a cooler. It calculates savings by reducing operation hours of condensing units and heaters, and accounts for additional fan power consumption. Peak demand savings are derived from connected loads and operational changes.
s shut off for 1,512 hours during the winter. Free cooling operation is a weather variable and will shut off the condensing unit when outside air temperatures drop below the temperature in the cooler. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The evaporator...
AI summary The document describes the on-site methodology used to observe and record data on evaporators, condensing units, and door heaters in stores located in Truro and Dartmouth. The store managers were interviewed to gather information on the performance of new equipment and baseline operations, including observations on free cooling and the operation of outside air dampers.
t but were not completely sure. They had no knowledge of baseline condensate heater operation. They have seen the outside air dampers open to provide free cooling but are not sure how often they work. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The on-site observations found that nameplate data matched tracking values for evaporator fans, condensing units, and door heaters. Cooler temperatures were satisfied during the site visit, and outside air supply fans and compressors were not operating. Door frames were cold, indicating anti-condensate heaters were not active, and evaporator fans were off in most locations.
that the controller was in override or that the fans would not shut off in the future. The evaluator was not able to compare box temperatures with fan control set points to further verify fan control. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that annual energy savings matched tracking savings, with no variances in equipment types or performance. Controls were operational, but calculations relied on fixed default values without additional monitoring to confirm equipment operation.
alculation changes for this project. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A31 There are no heating or cooling interactive savings or penalties for these measures. Peak demand savings are also 100% of the tracking estimate. Peak c...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on demand savings and adjustments for various equipment, such as evaporator fan controls and door heaters. The facility in question is a corrugated paper packaging plant with varying operational hours depending on the season.
ng processes typically run 24 hours per day and 6 days per week during their peak season of May to October. During off peak months, the manufacturing schedule drops to 8 hours a day for 5 days a week. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document details energy savings from a lighting retrofit project completed in 2009 and 2010 at a facility that operates 24/7 during peak season. Savings were recalculated after a site visit, with 76% of the 2010 savings attributed to the project. Generator savings include a 6.1% scale factor for transmission and distribution losses, and evaluated energy savings were 3.0% less than tracking savings.
4.2 26.2 Interactive Lighting 4,260 4,507 247 0.0 1.0 1.0 Total Savings 515,484 500,160 -15,325 48.0 75.1 27.1 Generator Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 542,409 525,887 -16,522 50.9 78.7...
AI summary The text presents a table showing savings from lighting and interactive lighting programs, including kWh and kW metrics, with differences between tracking and evaluated values. The context suggests an evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program.
50.9 79.7 28.8 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A33 3.0 Project Overview Table 2 below provides an overview of the fixtures installed, as well as the baseline fixtures that were removed: Table 2: Summary of Installed and Remo...
AI summary This section provides a summary of installed and removed fixtures as part of the 2010 C&I Custom Program evaluation. It includes details on the types and quantities of new fixtures installed and the preexisting fixtures removed.
148 4' 1L T-12 92 4' 1L T828 72 Note that these fixture quantities reflect slight changes to the counts made during the evaluation. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet based app...
AI summary The document details the calculation of tracking savings from a lighting retrofit project. Savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach, breaking down fixtures by type and location, and using formulas to estimate annual energy savings based on wattage differences and operating hours.
ccount for the fact that 24% of project savings had already been claimed during the 2009 program year. Total project energy and demand savings were multiplied by .76 to arrive at 2010 project savings. 5.0 On-Site Methodology During the sit...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program involved adjusting total project savings by 24% to account for savings already claimed in 2009. A site visit verified the installation of 753 out of 781 new lighting fixtures, and operating hours were assessed with the assistance of the site contact.
e peak coincidence factors, which could have assisted in calculating peak demand savings. For the evaluation savings estimate, these data were further analyzed to determine the percentage of time lights in each monitored area were on durin...
AI summary The text describes a methodology for evaluating peak demand savings from a lighting retrofit, involving the use of peak coincidence factors and connected load reduction. It also outlines a new method for calculating interactive cooling demand savings using specific formulas and factors.
d savings. As in the tracking analysis, project energy and demand savings were scaled by a factor of .76 to account for the fact that 24% of project savings had been claimed for the 2009 program year. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The document evaluates energy and demand savings from the 2010 C&I Custom Program. Annual energy savings were 97% of tracking savings, but the tracking system was not updated with M&V results. Peak demand savings exceeded tracking estimates due to differences in coincidence factors used in calculations.
open 24 hours per day and 7 days per week to allow students to work on projects at all hours. The university only closes for one week between Christmas and New Years, otherwise it operates year round. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document describes a comprehensive lighting retrofit project conducted across the university campus, resulting in energy and demand savings. The savings were recalculated and verified, showing a slight reduction in evaluated energy savings compared to tracking savings. Table 1 summarizes the results of the project.
-3.8 Interactive Lighting 14,174 13,720 -454 0.0 2.1 2.1 Total Savings 398,635 395,693 -2,943 64.4 62.7 -1.7 Generator Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 411,758 409,092 -2,665 69.0 64.9 -4....
AI summary The document presents energy savings data from a lighting retrofit project, including the number of fixtures installed and energy savings in kWh and kW. The retrofit included various types of fixtures such as T8 and CFLs, and the data is organized into categories like 'Lighting' and 'Interactive Lighting'.
151 23W CFLs 4 2x14W CFLs 14 2.4W LED Fixtures Note that these fixture quantities reflect slight changes to the counts made during the evaluation. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were calculated using a...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit project, including the use of different light fixtures and the methodology for tracking savings. It also mentions the impact of lower wattage fixtures on heating and cooling loads, with equations provided for calculating these effects.
. Peak demand savings were calculated by a applying a coincidence factor of .9 to the gross change in connected load for the entire campus. Demand savings from interactive effects were not considered. 5.0 On-Site Methodology Since this pro...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program discusses the methodology used to calculate peak demand savings and on-site verification processes. A coincidence factor of 0.9 was applied, and a sampling approach was used to verify proper installation of lighting fixtures across the campus.
retrofitted on a 1-for-1 basis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A41
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on retrofitting on a 1-for-1 basis. It appears to be a part of a larger evaluation process, likely related to energy efficiency or utility programs.
In one area, the retrofits were found to be incomplete. According to the site contact, the gallery was retrofitted with 31 CFLs as proposed, but then returned to the original state at the request of students who thought the new lights prod...
AI summary The retrofitting of lighting fixtures in a college was found to be incomplete in one area due to student feedback. Lighting logger data was used to estimate savings, but only two loggers were installed, limiting the ability to adjust peak demand savings calculations. Adjustments were made to fixture counts and the peak demand calculation method.
hat demand savings result from cooling and a demand penalty occurs for heating. The coincidence factor accounts for the fact that lights may not necessarily be operating during the peak demand period. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows that annual energy savings were 99.3% of the tracking savings, with peak demand savings at 97.3% of the tracking estimate. Issues included incorrect data entry in the tracking database and unimplemented retrofitting. If properly updated, the demand savings realization rate would have increased to 101.4%.
g database. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A43 Project ID: C-348218-2 1.0 Facility Overview This lighting project was installed across eight different buildings in three locations. These were air maintenance facilities and...
AI summary This document evaluates a 2010 lighting retrofit project across eight buildings in three locations, focusing on energy and demand savings. An extensive retrofit was completed, with savings recalculated based on site visits and program documentation. Evaluated energy savings were 19.6% less than the tracking savings.
8 188 90 Area 5 FB 6L T5HO 83 351 Area 6 FB 6L T-5HO 61 351 Area 7 1L 4' T-8 6 23 Area 7 2L 4' T-8 77 42 Area 7 2L T-8 HBF 60 76 Area 7 4L 8' T-8 482 90 Total 3,163 98.9 Avg/Fixt NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A45 Table 3:...
AI summary The text presents a table summarizing the removal of fixtures as part of an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program. It lists various areas, fixture types, quantities removed, and average fixture values, concluding with a total of 3,163 fixtures removed with an average value of 98.9 per fixture.
96 160 Area 5 1000W MH 77 1,075 Area 5 175W Wall Pks 44 205 Area 5 1L 4' T-12 71 50 Area 5 2L 4' T-12 902 80 Area 5 2L 8' T-12 12 137 Area 5 400W MH 6 450 Area 5 4L 4' T-12 132 160 Area 6 400W MH 450 61 Area 7 1L 4' T-12 6 50 Area 7 2L 4'...
AI summary The document lists various lighting fixtures and their quantities in different areas, noting that pre-existing fixtures were taken at face value due to unavailability for verification. The quantities reflect on-site inventories, and replacements at a remote maintenance location are included in tracking savings.
te visit and those fixtures are not NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A46 included in the lighting summary. Site personnel could not confirm the installation matches tracking estimates at that site. Fixture tables do not inclu...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program indicates that the installed lighting fixtures do not fully match tracking estimates, with some original baseline fixtures still in use. The majority of the installed fixtures are T8 lamps and ballasts, while T5 equipment accounts for a smaller portion.
Total T-8 2,760 87.3% Total T-5 403 12.7% Totals 3,163 100.0% 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet based approach. The lighting retrofit was broken down into groups of lights by...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology used to calculate tracking savings from a lighting retrofit program. Savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach, breaking down lighting fixtures by type and location, and using a formula to estimate annual energy savings based on pre- and post-retrofit wattage and operating hours.
ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh to kWh conversion factor Logger information and trend logs we...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from lighting retrofits, including direct savings calculations based on fixture wattage, usage hours, and conversion factors. It also mentions interactive cooling savings due to reduced waste heat and lower air conditioning loads. Logger data was used to verify operating hours, though some data was unclear or inconsistent.
location and operation. These adjustment factors ranged from 28.68% in a remote maintenance facility to 100.0% in main high-bay work areas. Demand savings from interactive effects were not considered. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The installati...
AI summary The document outlines the on-site methodology used to assess lighting equipment installation and operation. Adjustments factors varied between locations, and demand savings from interactive effects were not considered. The site contact confirmed baseline assumptions, and a detailed inventory of fixtures was conducted to match tracking documents.
xtures according to general usage along with the fixture type. Annual lighting operation was also obtained for each location. The savings re-creation spreadsheet was populated from the collected data. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The document discusses on-site observations and findings related to lighting fixtures, noting discrepancies between inventory data and tracking documentation. Variations in fixture quantities and installed technologies contributed to reduced annual savings. Some differences may be due to access issues, labeling inconsistencies, and terminology differences.
d 6. These fixtures are located in NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A49 support/service areas. They are not included in the high-bay work area circuits and do not operate 8760 hour per year. Interactive heating and cooling ef...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program discusses energy savings and demand reductions. Annual energy savings were 80.4% of tracking estimates, with reductions due to changes in fixture counts and technology. Peak demand savings were 91.6% of tracking estimates. The facility described is a multistory office building in Halifax.
in downtown Halifax. The building comprises 230,000 square feet of leasable space spanning 15 floors. Most offices operate on typical 8 AM to 6 PM weekday schedules with occasional weekend occupancy. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document details a lighting retrofit project in a 230,000 square foot building in downtown Halifax. The retrofit involved replacing T12 fixtures with T8 fixtures, resulting in energy and demand savings. The savings were recalculated based on program documentation, analysis, and verification during a site visit, with evaluated energy savings being 0.3% less than tracking savings.
9.1 -0.6 Interactive Lighting -3,022 -3,006 16 0 -0.7 -0.7 Total Savings 644,536 641,059 -3,477 149.8 148.5 -1.3 Generator Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 693,534 689,793 -3,741 160.4 159...
AI summary The text provides a summary of energy savings from a project involving lighting and interactive lighting fixtures, including kWh and kW metrics. It also references a project overview and Table 2, which details new fixtures installed and those they replaced. The document is part of an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program.
t and the fixtures they replaced. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A51 Table 2: Summary of New and Pre-existing Fixtures New Fixture Preexisting Fixture Type Quantity Type Quantity 14W CFL 70 100a Table Lamp (?) 1 16W CFL 82...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, summarizing the replacement of various lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient alternatives. It provides a table comparing new and pre-existing fixtures, noting slight changes in quantities and some uncertainty in the naming of pre-existing fixtures.
he counts made during the evaluation. Question marks next to fixture types indicate cases where the meanings of the pre-existing fixture type names in the tracking spreadsheet were not entirely clear. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...
AI summary The document outlines the method used to calculate tracking savings from a lighting retrofit. Savings were determined by comparing pre- and post-retrofit wattage for different fixture types and locations, using annual operating hours to estimate energy savings in kWh.
four data loggers. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A52 Interactive heating and cooling savings were also claimed for this project. Since the new fixtures operate at lower wattages, and thus impart less heat to the buildings,...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive heating and cooling savings from a project involving new fixtures that operate at lower wattages. The net effect is determined using a specific equation that considers factors like direct lighting savings, heat gain factors, and seasonality factors.
e logger data to tenant spaces. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A53
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on its performance and impact. It includes analysis and findings related to the program's effectiveness in achieving energy efficiency goals for commercial and industrial customers.
6.0 On-site Observations and Findings On each of the sampled floors, there were slight discrepancies between the verified installations and the fixture quantities claimed in the tracking data. In general, these discrepancies were on the or...
AI summary The document reports slight discrepancies between verified installations and fixture quantities claimed in tracking data across various floors. Discrepancies were generally small, ranging from 1 to 2 lights, with most floors showing minimal differences between tracked and evaluated counts.
5 0 1L F28 T8 12 12 0 Floor 3 (Men's WR) 2L F28 T8 4 4 0 Since all retrofits were performed on a 1-for-1 basis, the slightly lower evaluation counts reflect a reduction in savings. However, since the discrepancies were relatively minor, it...
AI summary The evaluation of lighting retrofits showed minor discrepancies in savings due to 1-for-1 retrofitting, but no systemic issues were found. Logger data indicated emergency lights operate 7,700 hours annually, while office lighting operates 3,201 hours annually. Adjustments were made to fixture counts and coincidence factors for peak demand calculations.
od. Equation 3 was applied to all retrofitted areas of the building served by HVAC systems (100% in this case). Savings from all areas were summed to arrive at interactive effects peak demand savings. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program at a dairy plant found that annual energy savings were 99.5% of the tracking savings, while peak demand savings were 99.1% of the tracking estimate. The slight reduction in savings was due to fewer retrofitted fixtures and interactive effects from heating penalties.
llow a more weekday schedule of roughly 8 am to 5 pm. Heating is provided by #2 oil. Direct expansion cooling equipment provides space cooling. Ammonia chillers are used for refrigeration at the site. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary The document describes an energy efficiency project at a facility that included a lighting retrofit across various areas, resulting in energy and demand savings. The savings were recalculated and verified, showing a 13.6% increase in evaluated energy savings compared to tracking savings.
-8.8 Interactive Lighting 49,531 96,113 46,583 0.0 11.4 11.4 Total Savings 372,900 423,785 50,885 50.8 53.4 2.6 Generator Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 343,095 347,660 4,565 53.9 44.5 -...
AI summary The document presents data on energy savings from lighting programs, including interactive lighting and total savings, along with details on installed fixtures in a 2010 C&I Custom Program evaluation.
ec. Ball 112 21 4' 6L T8 154 11 6L T5 200 245 Table 3: Summary of Removed Fixtures Fixture Type Quantity Fixt. Wattage 4' 2L mag. Ball 20 88 4' 4L mag. Ball 60 156 8' 2L mag. Ball 21 170 HPS 14 225 HPS 35 360 MH 10 225 MH 8 250 MH 189 360...
AI summary The text summarizes the removal and replacement of lighting fixtures in a facility. High-intensity discharge (HID) fixtures, such as HPS and MH, were replaced with more energy-efficient T5 and T8 lighting in high-bay production areas and other locations. The quantities and wattages of the removed fixtures are listed in the tables.
lamp T8 equipment. These new units provide quicker re-strike in these large areas as well as energy savings. The remaining T8 equipment was installed in the offices, lunch room, and mechanical spaces. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcul...
AI summary The document discusses the installation of new T8 lighting equipment in large areas and offices, resulting in quicker re-strike and energy savings. Tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet approach, grouping lights by fixture type and location. Savings were calculated based on the difference between pre- and post-retrofit wattage, multiplied by annual operating hours.
1000 (1) where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh to kWh conversion factor No loggers were inst...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings from lighting retrofits, including direct savings and interactive cooling savings. It outlines formulas and assumptions used to estimate energy savings, such as the heat gain factor, seasonality factor, and coefficient of performance of cooling systems. The facility is heated with #2 fuel oil, so no heating penalty was applied.
tures according to general usage along with the fixture type. Annual lighting operation was also obtained for each location. The savings re- creation spreadsheet was populated from the collected data. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The document discusses on-site observations and findings related to fixture installations, highlighting a discrepancy between evaluated and tracked fixtures. The evaluation identified 356 fixtures, while tracking data counted 334, with differences attributed to variations in lamp/ballast configurations and fixture types.
6L T5 250 6L T5 245 Total 334 Total 356 Difference 22 There was also a small variation in equipment type installed. Six-lamp T8 fixtures were observed in production and dry storage areas. These fixtures did not exist prior to the project....
AI summary The text discusses variations in lighting equipment installed, including 6-lamp T5 fixtures with differing wattage values, and notes potential labeling issues. It also mentions the evaluation of cooling and refrigeration equipment, noting differences in COP values for various refrigeration systems.
efrigeration plant and extensive low temperature loads. Loads in freezers are continuous and year round. A 1.56 COP was assigned to low temperature freezers and a 1.72 COP for all other refrigeration. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation discusses energy savings from a refrigeration system upgrade, highlighting increased annual energy savings due to changes in COP values and fixture additions. It also outlines peak demand savings and the impact of generator demand savings from cooling interactions.
oject ID: C-528984-1 1.0 Facility Overview This facility is a large hotel in Downtown Dartmouth. The hotel contains numerous conference rooms, a large banquet hall, and a full service restaurant. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments An e...
AI summary This document outlines a lighting retrofit project at a large hotel in Downtown Dartmouth, including the replacement of T12 fixtures with T8 fixtures and the installation of occupancy sensors. The project resulted in energy and demand savings, but evaluated savings were 17.1% less than tracking savings.
0.4 Interactive Lighting -644 -534 110 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 Total Savings 137,354 113,812 -23,542 15.3 15.6 0.3 Generator Savings kWh kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Lighting 147,796 122,464 -25,332 16.4 16.8 0.4 In...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings from lighting and interactive lighting programs, including kWh and kW metrics, and highlights total savings and differences between tracking and evaluated figures. It is part of an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program.
16.4 16.7 0.3 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A61 3.0 Project Overview Table 2 below provides a summary of the new and pre-existing fixtures affected by this project. Table 2: Summary of New and Pre-existing Fixtures Pre-exi...
AI summary This section provides a summary of new and pre-existing fixtures affected by the project, detailing their types, quantities, and wattages. It includes a variety of lighting fixtures such as halogen, fluorescent, and LED retro kits, along with their respective wattages and quantities.
g credited to the program under the gross savings work, although the circumstances surrounding their installation suggests they might be considered spillover had they been fully explored at the site. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calcula...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating energy savings from a lighting retrofit project under the Program Development Agreement (PDA). Savings were estimated using a spreadsheet-based approach, grouping fixtures by type and location, and calculating the difference in wattage before and after installation.
iW prei n postiW posti )h ES L i 1000 (1) where, ES L = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) n = Number of fixtures W = Fixture wattage i = Lighting group i h = Assumed lighting annual hours of operation 1,000 = Wh to...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit project, including both direct lighting savings and interactive heating and cooling effects. It outlines formulas used to compute these savings and notes the assumptions made regarding heat gain factors for heating and cooling seasons.
areas. Since the Metrix analysis was not available for review at the time of the evaluation, savings were calculated relative to the feasibility study savings values available in the tracking system. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The on-site met...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program involved verifying the installation of retrofit fixtures and reviewing lighting operating schedules with the hotel's maintenance manager. Of 655 retrofit fixtures, 582 (88.9%) were verified, contributing significantly to load reduction and energy savings.
6.0 On-site Observations and Findings In general, the fixture counts verified on-site matched the counts specified in the tracking savings spreadsheet. There was however one major exception. In the tracking analysis, fixture counts for the...
AI summary On-site verification found that fixture counts in the banquet room were double-counted in the tracking analysis. The facility manager identified overestimations in lighting operating schedules. Adjustments were made to energy savings calculations using verified fixture counts and corrected operating schedules. Peak demand savings calculations were also revised to use independent coincidence factors for each lighting group.
od. Equation 3 was applied to all retrofitted areas of the building served by HVAC systems (100% in this case). Savings from all areas were summed to arrive at interactive effects peak demand savings. 7.0 Conclusions Annual energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows annual energy savings of 82.9% of tracking savings, with reductions due to removing double-counted savings and reduced operating hours. Peak demand savings exceeded tracking projections by 1.9% due to higher coincidence factors used in the evaluation.
ngs. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A66 Project ID: C-675561-1 1.0 Facility Overview This facility manufacturers disposable paper food products such as plates, bowls and egg cartons. The business runs a continuous manufactu...
AI summary A facility manufacturing disposable paper food products completed a motor retrofit project in 2009 and 2010, replacing 42 inefficient motors with premium efficiency models. Energy savings were evaluated, with generator savings accounting for transmission and distribution losses. Evaluated savings were 14.3% lower than tracking savings.
92.4 150 96.2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A68 Note that the motor efficiencies and sizes listed in Table 2 reflect changes made during the evaluation. With respect to motor size, only motor #6 was changed based on site c...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on motor efficiency changes and tracking savings calculations. It notes that motor size changes were made based on site conditions and that tracking savings were calculated using a spreadsheet-based approach based on the Project Development Agreement (PDA).
(2) where, = Installed Motor Power Factor = Installed Motor Nameplate Horsepower [HP] = Installed Motor Nameplate Efficiency NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A69 = Phase-to-Phase Conversion Factor = Preexisting Motor Phase-to...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of power draw for preexisting and installed motors in the context of energy efficiency programs. It highlights the use of the preexisting motor's nameplate amperage and power factor in calculations, despite the installed motor having a higher efficiency, and raises questions about the methodology used.
(4) where, = Installed Motor Power Draw [kW] = Preexisting Motor Power Draw [kW] = Preexisting Motor Efficiency NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A70 = Installed Motor Efficiency Finally, savings for a given motor were calcula...
AI summary The text outlines a method for calculating energy savings from motor upgrades, using preexisting and installed motor power draw and efficiency metrics to determine the energy savings in kWh.
demand savings calculation did not take into account variations in individual motor usage during the facility‘s operating schedule. These issues were subsequently addressed in the evaluation analysis. 5.0 On-Site Methodology During the sit...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program found that demand savings calculations did not account for variations in motor usage during operating hours. On-site verification confirmed motor installations, but some specifications differed slightly from those listed in the tracking analysis.
95.8 150 96.2 0.4 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A73 Notice that in all cases but one (Item 13), the specifications of the installed motors met or exceed the specifications claimed in the tracking analysis. In addition to g...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program notes that motor specifications met or exceeded claims, with revised operating hour data collected for evaluation. The data was used for analysis and is summarized in Table 4.
96.2 88.5 40 Not Logged NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A75 Using the data collected on-site, a revised analysis methodology was employed to correct for the errors in the tracking analysis. For the 34 motors where roughly on...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program involved correcting errors in tracking analysis by using post-installation amperage data for 34 motors. Two calculation methodologies were employed depending on the availability of data, with equations provided for both scenarios.
tt to kW Conversion Factor [W/kW] NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A76 = Installed Motor Nominal Efficiency = Preexisting Motor Nominal Efficiency = Weekly Operating Hours [h] = Annual Schedule Scale Factor In cases where bot...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on the methodology used to calculate motor efficiency savings. It highlights the challenges of comparing pre- and post-installation amperage data due to shifts in motor loads and explains the use of Equation 6 and 7 for calculating savings based on available data.
view Traffic lights throughout a regional municipality were replaced as part of this project. As with any city, traffic lights are required to operate 24 hours per day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. 2.0 Summary of Savings and Adjustments...
AI summary This project involved replacing 108 intersections' incandescent traffic signals with LED signals, achieving energy and demand savings. Savings were recalculated based on pre- and post-implementation data, showing 7.0% more evaluated energy savings than tracking savings. As of the end of the 2010 program year, 14 intersections remained unaddressed.
kW Tracking Evaluated Difference Tracking Evaluated Difference Traffic Lighting 1,232,524 1,318,411 85,887 139.9 150.5 10.6 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A79 3.0 Project Overview Table 2 below provides an overview of the i...
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program by comparing the number and wattage of pre-existing incandescent fixtures with newly installed LED fixtures. The data shows a significant reduction in total connected load from 352.3 kW to 38.4 kW after the program's implementation.
4,027 Total Connected Load (kW) 352.3 Total Connected Load (kW) 38.4 Note that the fixture quantities listed in Table 2 reflect changes made during the evaluation. 4.0 Tracking Savings Review and Calculations Since the project was not comp...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from a lighting retrofit project, using both the Program Development Agreement (PDA) and Monitoring and Verification (M&V) approaches. It outlines the methodology for calculating energy consumption based on fixture quantities, wattage, and operating schedules to determine annual energy savings.
ated as, (1) where, = Direct savings from the lighting retrofit (kWh) 8,760 = Annual Hours [hours] NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A80 = Intersection number = Quantity of affected intersections = Incandescent light of type a...
AI summary The text presents a formula for calculating direct savings from a lighting retrofit, using variables related to incandescent and LED lights, including quantities, wattages, and operating factors, as well as an annual hours value and a watt-to-kilowatt conversion factor.
tage [W] = Incandescent fixture operating factor = LED fixture quantity = LED fixture wattage [W] = LED fixture operating factor 1009 = W to kW conversion factor The various operating schedule factors, and , used in the analysis were deriv...
AI summary The text details assumptions about the operating schedules of traffic lights and pedestrian signals for energy efficiency analysis. It outlines how different light types (incandescent, LED) and signal types (green, yellow, red, pedestrian) operate under various conditions, with specific percentages for their usage. These factors were used in the M&V savings analysis.
was then subtracted from the instantaneous peak demand of the incandescent case to calculate demand savings. Demand savings from each intersection were then summed to calculate project demand savings. 5.0 On-Site Methodology The evaluation...
AI summary The document describes the on-site methodology used to evaluate the 2010 C&I Custom Program, including visits to the traffic office, inspection of LED fixtures, and verification of fixture counts at intersections. The evaluation involved comparing wattages of LED and incandescent fixtures with data from NSPI's M&V analysis.
ues used in NSPI‘s M&V analysis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A82 Table 4: Summary of verified and M&V signal wattages Signal Type Verified Wattage M&V Wattage 12" Green Traffic Signal 12 12 12" Amber Traffic Signal 13 17...
AI summary The table summarizes verified and M&V signal wattages for various traffic signals and pedestrian signals under NSPI's M&V analysis for the 2010 C&I Custom Program. Some signals show discrepancies between verified and M&V wattages, while the PED Countdown signal is marked as unverified.
l 10 14 PED Walk/Don't Walk Signal 6 6 PED Countdown Unverified 9 Although the verified wattages were lower than the wattages used in the M&V analysis, the site contact noted that the light types used throughout the project have changed. A...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program discusses discrepancies between verified wattages and M&V analysis wattages due to changes in light types. The M&V wattages may have been accurate for earlier installations, and fixture wattages were not adjusted for consistency. A spreadsheet provided by the site contact details affected intersections, and 11 intersections were visited for verification.
% 62.875% LED Pedestrian Countdown 16.500% 24.750% Incandescent Pedestrian 91.750% 87.625% Notice in Table 6 that the ―Incandescent Pedestrian‖ operating factor is equivalent to the sum of the LED pedestrian ―Walk‖ and ―Don‘t Walk‖ factors...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy savings from retrofitting pedestrian signals with LED technology. It explains how operating factors were developed and used to calculate energy savings for both protected and permissive intersections. Peak demand savings are calculated differently, using a simplified methodology based on annual energy savings divided by 8,760 hours.
oximate the mean demand savings, which is simply the annual energy savings divided by 8,760 hours. For the purposes of the evaluation, demand savings were calculated using this simplified methodology. 7.0 Conclusions Evaluated annual energ...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program shows that annual energy savings were 107.0% of the tracking estimate, and peak demand savings were 107.6% of the tracking estimate. The discrepancy between evaluated and tracking savings is attributed to differing operating factors, with the evaluation using a heavier weighting towards red lights, which provide greater savings compared to baseline incandescent fixtures.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C1 Appendix C Interview Guides PARTICIPANT QUESTIONNAIRE: C&I Custom Program Final: July 22, 2010 Hello, my name is from NMR Group. I am calling on behalf of Nova Scotia Power, as part of an e...
AI summary This document is a participant questionnaire for Nova Scotia Power's Commercial and Industrial Custom Program, used to evaluate and improve the program by gathering feedback from participants. It includes questions to confirm participation and identify the most knowledgeable individual within the company.
2. Contractor 3. Manufacturer representative 4. Utility account manager 5. Someone within your company / organization 9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall (ASK QUESTIONS Q13 – Q15 FOR THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND EACH MEASURE RECALLED.) [NOTE: Two-thir...
AI summary The text outlines potential respondents and factors influencing the implementation of energy measures, focusing on program incentives, energy cost savings, and environmental impact. It includes a list of respondents and motivations for implementing energy efficiency measures.
(To take advantage of program incentives) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C5 2. (To see what else I should be doing as part of a planned project) 3. (To save on energy costs/bills) 4. (To reduce maintenance costs) 5. (To imp...
AI summary The text outlines motivations for participating in energy efficiency programs, including saving on energy costs, reducing maintenance, and environmental benefits. It also references a feasibility study and includes instructions for asking about free-ridership for each measure.
rganization had not participated in the NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C6 Commercial and Industrial Custom Program, which of the following actions do you think you would have taken? Please select all that apply. Would you h...
AI summary The document evaluates the impact of the 2010 Commercial and Industrial Custom Program on participants' decisions to install energy-efficient equipment. It asks respondents about potential actions if the program had not existed and assesses the program's influence on their decisions.
you installed or pursued through the Commercial and Industrial Custom program? 1. Yes 2. No 3. Don‘t know [IF Q17 = NO / DON‘T KNOW FOR EVERY MEASURE GO TO Q20] IF Q16=YES: Q17. Was equipment of the same level or a higher level of efficien...
AI summary This text is a series of survey questions related to energy efficiency measures, specifically asking whether equipment was purchased and installed independently by the respondent and whether it met or exceeded the efficiency levels of equipment installed through the Commercial and Industrial Custom program.
he amount of [measure x] installed or pursued through the program? % (Don‘t know=999) ALLOW 1-998—THEY COULD HAVE INSTALLED MORE THAN WAS INSTALLED THROUGH THE PROGRAM. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C9 19. Did your experie...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the impact of the Commercial and Industrial Custom program on participants' decisions to install energy-efficient measures. It asks about the percentage of measures installed independently and whether the program influenced these decisions.
1. Yes Measure x _ _ _% 2. No 9. Don’t know 20. Has your participation in the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program influenced other energy efficiency actions that your company / organization has taken? 1. Yes. We have implemented addit...
AI summary The text is part of a survey assessing whether participation in the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program influenced additional energy efficiency actions, including measures like energy management systems, insulation, and behavior changes. It lists possible implemented or pursued measures.
n‘t know/Don‘t recall NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C10 IMPLEMENTED MEASURES Q21A1. FOR EACH Q21=1 (except scoping, feasibility or technical assessments): Did you implement this energy efficient upgrade through a Nova Scot...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions related to the implementation of energy-efficient upgrades through Nova Scotia Power programs, including whether the upgrade was implemented through a program, the reason if not, the implementation date, and estimated energy savings in 2010.
OR $ _ (88888=Measure uses fuel other than electricity: What fuel is that? _ IF NON-ELECTRIC FUEL (88888) SKIP TO NEXT MEASURE IN Q21=1.) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C11 Q21A5. (IF Q21A4 ≠ 88888): And how many kilowatt h...
AI summary The text outlines a questionnaire for evaluating energy efficiency measures, including questions about expected electricity savings and whether energy-efficient upgrades will be implemented through Nova Scotia Power programs. It also asks about the reasons for not participating in such programs and the expected timeline for implementation.
ct to have [energy efficient upgrade from Q21=2] implemented? 1. 2011 2. 2012 3. 2013 4. 2014 or later 5. (Don‘t know / not sure) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C12 6. (Refused) Q21B4. Approximately, how many kilowatt hours...
AI summary This section of the document asks respondents about the year they plan to implement energy-efficient upgrades and estimates the expected electricity savings from those upgrades in a specific year and over a full calendar year. It also includes instructions for handling responses where the measure uses non-electric fuel.
l Calendar Year Savings: _ kWh OR $ _ WHEN ALL MEASURES WHERE Q21=2 HAVE BEEN COVERED IN Q21B SERIES CONTINUE TO SECTION III, Q22. Section III. Satisfaction with Program & Recommendations for Improvements 22. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=...
AI summary The text outlines a survey section evaluating the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program, asking respondents to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the program and identify any barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures.
24. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in implementing these energy efficiency measures? 1. Yes 2. No (SKIP TO Q30) 9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall 25. What was the ONE most important barrier? (Do not read) 1. (Concern that ac...
AI summary The text presents a survey question about challenges in implementing energy efficiency measures, listing several potential barriers. It also references an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program by NMR.
3. (Too little incentive) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C14 4. (Too much work required to obtain funding) 5. (Too little information about the program) 6. (Cost savings not worth the effort of applying) 7. (Approval takes...
AI summary The document presents a survey with questions about barriers to participation in a commercial and industrial energy efficiency program, including issues such as insufficient incentives, excessive effort required to obtain funding, and lack of information. It also asks about the importance of energy usage reduction and energy cost management to the organization.
or outcomes that are not included in the C&I logic model?] d. How do you think this program will affect the overall market in the intermediate term? What is the mechanism by which this impact on the market will be achieved? NMR Evaluation...
AI summary The text outlines questions regarding the long-term goals of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, its impact on the market, and how program success will be measured. It focuses on outcomes such as persistent energy savings, market adoption of new technologies, and the development of the energy efficiency services industry.
rogram delivery be improved? NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C20
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on whether program delivery can be improved. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power.
what would you say are the programs greatest weaknesses? What could be done to address these weaknesses? 29. Based on your experience with the program so far, what are the most important improvements that still need to be made to the progr...
AI summary The document includes a set of interview questions for participants in Nova Scotia Power's Commercial and Industrial Custom and Business Energy Rebate programs. The questions focus on program weaknesses, potential improvements, and unaddressed issues. The interview is conducted by NMR Group, Inc. on behalf of Nova Scotia Power.
t pose a barrier to participation in the C&I Custom program? [Probes: Assistance, availability, or interaction with program staff; requirements of any of the four-steps;] The BER program was designed to streamline the rebate process for C&...
AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebate (BER) program and its implementation by C&I customers, highlighting the simplicity of the BER compared to the C&I Custom program. It also explores participant experiences, identifying potential barriers and motivations for participation in energy efficiency programs.
cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at evaluating the experience of participants in NSPI rebate programs, focusing on barriers to participation, challenges in implementation, satisfaction levels, and gaps in program coverage. It also asks about the effectiveness of communication, rebate amounts, and measurement and verification processes.
ith NSPI staff [Does this vary by program at all?] e. Project implementation f. Rebate amounts [Does this vary by program at all?] g. Measurement and verification h. Application, rebate/incentive and associated paperwork [Does this vary by...
AI summary The text includes questions about energy efficiency programs administered by NSPI, focusing on rebate implementation, project execution, and free-ridership. It also asks respondents about their plans and actions regarding energy efficiency upgrades in the absence of NSPI incentives.
5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures could...
AI summary The text asks respondents to consider energy-efficient equipment and upgrades implemented or pursued by their company in the past two years, including whether they were installed independently or through rebate programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010.
ent measures and processes; or the NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C26 savings could be from PLANNED OR END-OF-LIFE replacements and installations of higher efficiency rather than standard efficiency measures and processes....
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures and their impact on electricity savings, asking participants about the influence of programs like C&I Custom and BER on their decision to implement energy efficiency actions. It also includes questions about the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to organizations.
sts to your company / organization? [9=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] 32. What percent of your annual operating budget do energy costs account for? [999=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] % 33. Do you have any suggestions on how to improve any of the NSPI...
AI summary This document is a final report on the impact and process evaluation of the Small Business Direct Install Program 2010, submitted by NMR Group, Inc. and KEMA, Inc. to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes survey questions and findings related to energy costs and rebate programs.
50-2 Howard Street, Somerville, MA 02144 Phone: (617) 284-6230 Fax: (617) 284-6239 www.nmrgroupinc.com Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................
AI summary The document outlines the structure of a program description and impact evaluation, including sections on program theory, logic models, research design, and evaluation methodology. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency programs.
.......................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................
AI summary The text outlines the methodology and structure of a study, including in-depth interviews, telephone surveys, and sampling error considerations. It also covers program goals, responsibility, outreach, awareness, prior purchases, and post-participation energy efficiency actions.
ICIENCY ACTIONS ................................................................................. 23 3.8 LIGHTING USAGE BEHAVIORS ................................................................................................................
AI summary The text outlines sections related to energy efficiency actions, focusing on lighting usage behaviors, participant motivations and barriers, and satisfaction with the program. It also includes sections on energy attitudes, behaviors, and firmographics, with an appendix on interview guides.
Tables TABLE 1: 2010 PROGRAM ENERGY SAVINGS .................................................................................................. I TABLE 2-1: SUMMARY OF SBLS 2010 PROGRAM TRACKING SAVINGS ........................................
AI summary The text presents a series of tables related to energy savings and program tracking under the SBLS (Small Business Lighting Program) for the years 2008, 2010, and other related data. The tables include information on energy savings, connected demand, free-ridership, and program influence, as well as sampling details and sources of awareness for the program.
............... 17 TABLE 3-3: SOURCE OF FIRST AWARENESS OF SBLS PROGRAM .......................................................... 21 TABLE 3-4: PRIOR PURCHASES OF EFFICIENT LIGHTING PRODUCTS ..................................................
AI summary The text provides a list of tables related to the Small Business Lighting Program (SBLS), including participant awareness, prior purchases, program influence, barriers, and satisfaction levels. These tables are used for evaluating the program's effectiveness and participant experiences.
PRODUCTS IN THE FUTURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 TABLE 3-17: BARRIERS TO PURSUING ADDITIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENT E...
AI summary The text outlines various tables and figures related to energy efficiency, including barriers to adopting energy-efficient equipment, energy costs as a percentage of operating budgets, and the importance of energy management. It also references the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program logic model.
...................... 36 Figures FIGURE 1-1: SMALL BUSINESS LIGHTING SOLUTIONS PROGRAM LOGIC MODEL ...........................4 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page I Executive Summary This report presents...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program (SBLS), conducted by NMR Group, Inc. for Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The evaluation includes process and impact assessments and compares 2010 results with those from 2008 and 2009. The DSM Administrator contracted with service providers, a materials vendor, and a recycling contractor to deliver audit, installation, and recycling services.
nerator 1,758.5 12,944 Net-to-Gross Ratio (%) 87.0% 86.6% Net annual savings at generator 1,529.9 11,210 Key Findings The net energy impacts of the SBLS program have increased steadily since 2008. They have more than tripled from 1,522 MWh...
AI summary The SBLS program's net energy impacts have increased significantly since 2008, with customer satisfaction remaining high and free-ridership at about 13% in 2010. NMR recommended monitoring the performance of Delivery Agents and other partners to maintain quality and satisfaction.
Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation SBLS-F1. SBLS-R1. In 2010, the SBLS program formally added a Recycling Contractor The SBLS program should continue to require that all responsible for collecting and recycling lamps and b...
AI summary The SBLS program improved its recycling process in 2010 by adding a Recycling Contractor for lamp and ballast collection. However, recruitment still relied heavily on word-of-mouth and trade allies, with 55% of participants citing these methods. The report recommends continued recycling mechanisms and the use of business cards for better outreach.
%) cited word of mouth (23%) the contact information for the Delivery Agent in their or trade allies (22%)—electricians, contractors or vendors. region. SBLS-F3. SBLS-R3. The DSM Administrator should continue to Customers were motivated to...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program was primarily motivated by cost savings, with 71% of participants citing energy cost reduction as their main reason for joining. The DSM Administrator is advised to continue emphasizing the financial benefits of the program to small businesses.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page III
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It provides an overview of the program's goals, strategies, and performance, highlighting key findings and recommendations for improvement.
Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation SBLS-F4. SBLS-R4. As in 2008, the 2010 SBLS program encountered materials delivery NMR recommends that the DSM Administrator carefully issues. Delivery Agents estimated that anywhere betw...
AI summary The 2010 SBLS program faced material delivery issues, with 60% to 80% of deliveries being late or incorrect. Despite a quality action plan, issues persisted. Nova Scotia Power recommends monitoring the new program design and setting reliability and quality criteria for vendors.
uirements. SBLS-F5. SBLS-R5. Some respondents cited barriers to implementing additional energy At the time of participant contact, the DSM Administrator efficiency measures (beyond those covered by the program) including should continue to...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program found that participants faced barriers such as lack of financing and information in implementing additional energy efficiency measures. The program was identified as a crucial source of assistance and funding, with participants showing low free-ridership and limited spillover effects.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page IV Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation SBLS-F7. SBLS-R7. While nearly all of the 2010 respondents (63 out of 65) said they would Despite the importance o...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program found that while most respondents were likely to purchase energy-efficient equipment in the future, few reported taking additional energy efficiency measures after participating in the program. The main barriers cited were lack of knowledge and information about additional measures.
Nova Scotia. A lack of interested electrical contractors could lead to inadequate resources to perform installations. Short-Term Outcomes Generate customer interest. Customers are made aware of the program by Delivery Agents. Lighting...
AI summary The text discusses the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program in Nova Scotia, focusing on its short-term and mid-term outcomes, including generating customer interest, performing lighting audits, and achieving energy savings and cost reductions for small businesses.
y similar between the two years. T8 fixtures represent the vast majority of activity in each year, with CFL and exit signs showing the greatest amount of activity among the remaining technologies. Table 2-2: Summary of SBLS 2008 and 2010 S...
AI summary The text summarizes the energy savings achieved by the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program in 2008 and 2010, highlighting the dominance of T8 fixtures in both years and the overall energy savings by lighting type.
2.3 Evaluation Methodology The approach to determining the impacts of the SBLS program in 2010 was based upon the evaluation results from the 2008 program year. The 2008 program year evaluation comprised 39 site visits with spot watt meter...
AI summary This section describes the evaluation methodology used for the SBLS program in 2010, which relied on the 2008 evaluation results. It discusses the factors influencing this decision, including the reliability of tracking systems for small business lighting and the realization rates from similar studies, which ranged from 85% to 120%.
at the realization rate for energy savings in the SBLS program in 2008 was determined to be 93.6% at the meter and 100% at the generator, which also falls into this range of realization rates. Table 2-3: Recent Small Business Impact Study...
AI summary The text discusses the realization rates for energy savings in the SBLS program in 2008, which were 93.6% at the meter and 100% at the generator. It also references various studies from different states and regions that evaluated lighting realization rates using different methods such as on-site visits and billing analysis.
: 99.6%, CFL: 85.2%, On-site visits New Hampshire4 NHEC, PSNH, Unitil, 2003 Exits: 102.5% with M&V New York5 NYSERDA Small Commercial On-site visits 94%, + 14% Precision Lighting, 2006 with M&V 1 http://www.ctsavesenergy.org/files/CT%20SBE...
AI summary The document presents evaluation data for the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, including metrics such as 99.6% and 85.2% for CFL usage, and references on-site visits and M&V (Monitoring and Evaluation) processes. It also cites reports from various states and organizations, including New Hampshire and New York.
To more fully assess the transferability of the 2008 SBLS results to the 2010 program year, the NMR Team spoke with program implementers to assess differences in program operations between the two program years. The SBLS program was confir...
AI summary The document discusses the transferability of the 2008 SBLS program results to the 2010 program year, noting that program operations are largely unchanged except for expanded availability province-wide. It highlights discrepancies in wattage assumptions between the tracking system and on-site measurements, which affected savings estimates in 2008 and are still used in 2010.
ce from another DSM program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 10 participating in the SBLS program, and only four of these respondents said the equipment was of the same efficiency or higher than had be...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program found a very low spillover rate (<1%), with some participants reporting non-like spillover. The spillover rate was calculated based on additional lighting installed and estimated savings from program records. However, without follow-up inspections, the actual efficiency and savings from spillover could not be determined.
Table 2-7: CFL Free-ridership Stated Intent Questions Free- Question Question Responses Rider Number Score Now I would like to ask you to consider what actions you would have taken in the absence of the Small Business Lighting Solutions Pr...
AI summary The text presents a table from a regulatory proceeding discussing free-ridership in the context of the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program. It asks respondents about their intended actions if they had not participated in the program, with responses indicating a mix of delayed installation, no installation, and installation of less efficient lighting.
lled through the program Don‘t know 25% Stated Intent Score = average of FR2a, FR2b, FR2c+ci, and FR2d. Table 2-8: CFL Free-ridership Program Influence Questions Free- Question Question Responses Rider Number Score How influential were the...
AI summary The text presents data from a survey assessing the influence of various elements on participation in the Small Business Lighting Solutions program. Respondents rated the influence of NSPI incentives, initial contact by program representatives, and NSPI-funded lighting audits on their decision to install energy-efficient lighting.
el impacts were estimated to be 11,210 MWh of energy savings and 1,529.5kW of demand savings. These savings fell short of the energy savings goal of 13,980 MWh and the demand savings goal of 3,300 kW. Table 2-11: Program Energy Savings Est...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program achieved energy savings of 11,210 MWh and demand savings of 1,529.5 kW, which were below the set goals of 13,980 MWh and 3,300 kW, respectively. A process evaluation was conducted using interviews and surveys to assess the program's effectiveness.
with a single ―Materials Vendor‖ and ―Recycling Contractor,‖ who was responsible for supplying lighting materials to the Delivery Agents, and collecting materials (lamps and fixtures) for recycling. 3.3 Program Responsibility and Communica...
AI summary The SBLS program's responsibilities are distributed among the DSM Administrator, Delivery Agents, Materials Vendor, and Recycling Contractor. The DSM Administrator oversees customer pre-qualification, authorization, audits, and compensation, while Delivery Agents handle customer interaction, audits, installations, and project coordination.
June 24 th and August 23rd NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 20 2010.11,12 Despite requests made to the Delivery Agents and Materials Vendor for additional information, NMR was unable to determine the tr...
AI summary NMR evaluated the 2010 SBLS program and found that materials delivery issues could not be fully assessed due to lack of information. In response, the DSM Administrator changed the program design in 2011, allowing Delivery Agents to source materials themselves while adhering to price constraints, to improve program performance and customer service.
ad previously purchased energy efficient products, more than seven out of ten (71%) reported having purchased CFLs and two-fifths (20%) reported retrofitting T-12 lighting with T8s or T5s. (Table 3-4) Table 3-4: Prior Purchases of Efficien...
AI summary The text discusses the purchase of energy-efficient lighting products by respondents in 2008, 2009, and 2010, with a focus on CFLs and retrofitting T-12 lighting with T8s or T5s. It also notes that about two-fifths of 2010 respondents had prior plans for lighting improvements before engaging with the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.
fic plans to pursue lighting improvements prior to talking with anyone about the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program— similar to 2008 (42%) and significantly more than in 2009 (22%). (Table 3-5) Table 3-5: Prior Plans to Pursue Light...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program shows that only 12% of participants installed additional energy-efficient lighting post-participation, with only four of these installations matching or exceeding the efficiency of the SBLS program. Participation in the program influenced these additional installations.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 24 Respondents were also asked if participation in the SBLS program had influenced them to pursue additional energy efficiency actions other than lighting improvements...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program found that 29% of respondents indicated participation influenced them to take additional energy efficiency actions beyond lighting improvements, including heating system upgrades, behavior changes, and improvements to ceilings and insulation.
. Other subsequent actions reported by respondents included upgrading insulation and actions related to air conditioners, water tanks, lighting, energy audits, windows and air compression. (Table 3-7)
AI summary Respondents reported various energy efficiency actions including upgrading insulation, air conditioners, water tanks, lighting, energy audits, windows, and air compression as part of their initiatives.
Table 3-7: Influence of Program on Additional Energy Efficiency Actions Program Influenced Additional Actions 2008 2009 2010 Sample size 50 50 65 No 62% 76% 66% Yes 34 22 29 Don‘t Know 2 2 5 Type of Action Taken 2008 2009 2010 Sample size...
AI summary The table presents data on how a program influenced additional energy efficiency actions from 2008 to 2010. It shows the percentage of participants who took additional actions, the types of actions taken, and the sample sizes for each year.
- 11 Additional energy efficient lighting 10 5 Technical assessments/audit 6 20 5 Windows 5 Air Compression 5 Continue program at another facility 12 10 Awareness of energy consumption 10 Refrigeration 6 Changed lights at home 6 Fuel switc...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program evaluation found that 85% of participants used their new energy-efficient lighting the same as before, with no significant behavioral changes impacting energy savings. This aligns with findings from previous years, indicating the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency without unintended usage patterns.
of other less efficient lighting. As in 2008 and 2009, these results indicate that energy savings were not impacted by behavioral changes as a result of the influence of the SBLS program. (Table 3-8) Table 3-8: Use of New Lighting Relative...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program indicates that energy savings were not significantly impacted by behavioral changes. Most participants cited energy cost savings as their primary motivation for joining the program, with improving lighting conditions as the second most common motivation.
Table 3-9: Reasons for Participating 2008 2009 2010 Second Second Second Most Most Most Most Most Most Important Important Important Important Important Important Motivations Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivatio...
AI summary The table shows the reasons for participating in energy efficiency programs from 2008 to 2010. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs, with a significant decline in the percentage of participants citing this reason over time. Other motivations included improving lighting conditions, reducing maintenance costs, and taking advantage of program incentives.
2 2 2 Already changing 2 out lights Reduce carbon 4 4 8 footprint Get experts to do 2 audit and installation Replace non-working 2 3 equipment To increase resale 2 value † Don‘t Know 6 18 17 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting S...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program shows that 88% of respondents faced no barriers to participation, similar to findings from 2008 and 2009. A small percentage of respondents reported barriers, with 12% in 2010 indicating challenges.
l of the participants (93% or greater) reported that they were satisfied with the different aspects of the lighting equipment installed through the SBLS program, similar to 2008 and 2009. (Table 3-15) Table 3-15: Satisfaction with Lighting...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program shows high satisfaction with the lighting equipment installed, with over 90% of participants reporting satisfaction across various aspects. Additionally, 63 out of 65 respondents indicated they would likely purchase energy-efficient equipment in the future.
Efficiency Actions The large majority of 2010 respondents (63 out of 65) reported that they would be likely to purchase energy efficient equipment when replacing equipment in the future. (Table 3-16) Table 3-16: Likelihood of Purchasing En...
AI summary The majority of respondents in 2010 indicated a high likelihood of purchasing energy-efficient equipment in the future. However, nearly two-fifths of those who did not pursue additional energy efficiency measures cited a lack of resources, such as financing or information, as a barrier. Another two-fifths stated they did not need additional measures or were unaware of available options.
Table 3-17: Barriers to Pursuing Additional Energy Efficient Equipment Barrier 2008 2009 2010 Sample size 33 39 44 No need/No additional measures to upgrade 27% 23% 20% Lack of financing 15 20 16 Lack of information 3 13 11 Lack of time 12...
AI summary Table 3-17 outlines barriers to pursuing additional energy-efficient equipment from 2008 to 2010. Key barriers include lack of financing, information, and time, with some respondents indicating no need for upgrades or expressing concerns about bill savings. The SBLS program was still in progress during this period.
† SBLS program still in progress 15 5 Have not considered other measures 6 5 Switched to another utility 3 Installed other measures before program 3 Not aware of rebates for other measures 6 3 ϐ Other 7 †ϐ Don‘t know 3 18 NMR Evaluation of...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program is still in progress, with some respondents not considering other measures or being unaware of rebates. Energy costs accounted for an average of 12.1% of annual operating budgets in 2010, slightly higher than in 2009 but not significantly so.
d about the same as reported in 2008 (15.7%). Among 2010 respondents, energy costs accounted for less than 20% of the annual operating budget for nearly all of the 2009 respondents (87%). (Table 3-18) Table 3-18: Energy Costs as a Percent...
AI summary The text discusses the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs across different years (2008, 2009, 2010) and highlights the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs among respondents. Energy costs as a percent of the budget decreased over time, with most respondents considering energy cost management and reduction important to their businesses.
costs (96%) were important to their businesses; about one out of four respondents reported that reducing energy usage (75%) and managing energy costs (74%) were ‗very important‘ to them. (Table 3-19) Table 3-19: Importance of Energy Manage...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of energy management to businesses, highlighting that reducing energy usage and managing energy costs were very important to a large percentage of respondents. It also outlines the payback requirements for energy efficiency measures, with most businesses requiring a payback period of less than two years.
ur-fifths of 2010 respondents (86%) reported that their businesses operated less than 80 hours each week. Overall, 2010 respondents reported average operating hours of 60 hours each week. (Table 3-25) Table 3-25: Hours of Operation Hours 2...
AI summary The text presents data on the operating hours and company types of small business respondents in 2010, highlighting that most businesses operated less than 80 hours per week and that the majority were independent. The data is presented in tables and is related to the evaluation of the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.
Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B1 Appendix A Interview Guides Draft participant QUESTIONNAIRE: NSPI SBLS PROGRAM Final: July 22, 2010 Hello, I am with NMR Group, and we are performing an evaluation of ene...
AI summary This document outlines an interview questionnaire used to evaluate the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program by Nova Scotia Power. The questionnaire aims to gather participant feedback on their experience with the program and previous participation in other energy efficiency initiatives.
Scotia Power energy efficiency programs before participating in the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to Q7) 9. Don‘t know (Go to Q7) 5. Which programs did your company / organization participate in prior to the S...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to participation in Scotia Power energy efficiency programs, specifically asking about prior participation in the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program and other programs. It also includes a question about the years of participation in identified programs.
nded by contractor) 11. (Past participation in utility programs) 12. (Other (Please explain )) 99. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B3 9. What was the second most important rea...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to participation in the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program, including reasons for participation and prior purchases of energy-efficient lighting products. The survey is part of an evaluation of the 2010 SBLS program conducted by NMR.
program, had your company / organization purchased any energy efficient lighting products? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to Q12) 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall (Go to FR1)) 11. What purchases of energy efficient lighting had your company / organization ma...
AI summary This section of the document asks participants whether they had previously purchased energy-efficient lighting products and whether they had plans to pursue lighting improvements before engaging with the Small Business Lighting Solutions program.
sue lighting improvements prior to talking with anyone about the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program? 1. Yes 2. No 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) Now I would like to ask you to consider what actions you would have taken in the absence...
AI summary The text asks respondents about their behavior in the absence of the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, including whether they would have postponed or reduced energy-efficient lighting installations, and how influential the program was in their decision to participate.
e energy efficient lighting ‖ and 5 indicates that the program was ―extremely influential to your decision to install the energy efficient lighting.‖ How influential was / were the: NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions...
AI summary The text evaluates the influence of various factors on the installation of energy-efficient lighting through the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program. It asks participants to rate the influence of NSPI incentives, information provided by program representatives, and NSPI-funded lighting audits on their decision to install the lighting.
aced 3. Use lights the same amount as the lights that were replaced 4. Use the lights more, but instead of other less efficient lights 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) SPILLOVER 21. Now I'd like you to think of the time since you participated...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the usage and impact of energy-efficient lighting upgrades installed through the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program. It asks participants about their lighting usage, additional upgrades, and the influence of the SBLS program on their decisions.
ficient lighting‖ and 5 indicates that the program was ―extremely influential to your decision to install the energy efficiency lighting.‖ [record response on scale of 1 to 5, 9 = Don‘t know] 25. Has your participation in the Small Busines...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the influence of the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program on energy efficiency actions and reasons for not pursuing additional measures. It asks respondents to rate the program's influence and list other energy efficiency measures implemented.
7. (Decision made elsewhere) 8. (Do not own building – have to work through owner) 9. (Other (Specify: _) ) 99. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) 28. In number of years or months, how quickly does your company / organization require energy efficie...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about energy efficiency payback requirements and satisfaction with the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program. It focuses on customer feedback regarding lighting quality, brightness, and energy savings.
c. How long it takes them to come on d. Flickering e. How long they last f. Energy savings provided by the measure 30. Also on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means ‗not at all satisfied‘ and 5=‗very satisfied‘, how satisfied are you with the f...
AI summary This section contains survey questions about the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on customer satisfaction with various aspects of the program and future intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. It also introduces a section on barriers to action and recommendations for improvements.
n implementing the energy efficiency measures provided through the program? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to Q30) 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) (Go to Q30) 36. What was the ONE most important barrier? (Do not read) 1. (Concern that actual bill savings w...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures through the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program, with options for respondents to indicate the most and second most important barriers they faced.
_ Section V. Firmographics 42. What is the principal building activity where the energy efficiency improvements were implemented? [DO NOT READ—BUT CONFIRM WITH RESPONDENT THAT THE CATEGORY YOU CHOOSE IS CORRECT] 1. Education 2. Food Sales...
AI summary This section asks respondents to identify the principal building activity where energy efficiency improvements were implemented, with multiple categories provided for selection. The document is part of an evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.
9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B11 Delivery Agent Interview Guide: NSPI SBLS Program Interviewer: Date of Interview: Time Begun: Time Ended: Respondent Name: Respondent Ti...
AI summary The text is an interview guide used by Nexus Market Research (NMR) to evaluate the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) Program delivered by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). The guide includes questions for delivery agents about their experience with the program, their role, and program processes.
implementations, retrofits, etc] 3. What is your current job title? What roles and responsibilities do you have at [Company]? 4. How did you first become aware of the SBLS program? NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions P...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at individuals involved in the SBLS program, focusing on their roles, interactions with NSPI, marketing strategies, and the program's implementation process. It explores how participants are aware of the program, communication with vendors, and the timeline from audit to savings analysis.
What is the average length of an on-site lighting audit? 12. How much time typically passes between the on-site audit and the presentation of cost and savings analysis to the customer? 13. As a percent about how much of this time is spent:...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions regarding the process of conducting on-site lighting audits, the time between audit and cost/savings analysis presentation, and the time between presentation and customer authorization. It also asks about follow-up procedures and safety protocols after retrofit work is completed.
b. On-site lighting audit NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B14 c. Preparation of cost and savings analysis d. Presentation of cost and savings analysis to customer e. Obtaining participant authorization...
AI summary The text outlines the process of the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program, including on-site lighting audits, cost and savings analysis, customer authorization, and direct installation of energy-efficient lighting. It also asks about participant perceptions, motivations, barriers, and spillover effects of the program.
Since participating in the SBLS program, have you implemented any other energy efficiency measures for any of the SBLS participants that you worked with? [IF NO SKIP TO FIRMOGRAPHICS] 36. Did participation in the SBLS program influence the...
AI summary The text includes questions about the impact of the SBLS program on energy efficiency measures, the types of measures implemented by participants, and suggestions for improving the program. It also includes firmographic questions related to company size and structure.
9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B16 Materials Vendor Interview Guide: NSPI SBLS Program Interviewer: Date of Interview: Time Begun: Time Ended: Respondent Name: Respondent Ti...
AI summary This document is an interview guide used by Nexus Market Research and Marketing (NMR) to evaluate the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) Program provided by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). The guide includes questions for materials vendors who have worked with NSPI customers participating in the SBLS Program.
ranty replacements? d. The agreed list of lighting products? [PROBE: Are there other products that should be on the list? Are there products that should not be on the list?] 11. Are there other incentives or rebates available, not provided...
AI summary The document presents a series of questions related to the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program, including inquiries about product lists, other incentives, program impacts on sales, and participant satisfaction with NSPI staff.
f 17. Incentive level provided NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B18 18. Program paperwork 19. Program delivery process and procedures 20. Availability of information about the program 21. The program ov...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program, focusing on data tracking, contractor perceptions, and firmographics. It includes inquiries about program improvements, contractor motivations, barriers to participation, and the number of full-time employees.
alent workers are employed by your company/organization? NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B19 15. Fewer than 5 16. 5 to 9 17. 10 to 19 18. 20 to 49 19. 50 to 99 20. 100 to 249 21. 250 or More 9. Don‘t k...
AI summary The document contains a portion of an evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) Program, including survey questions and an interview guide for recycling contractors. It includes questions about company size, independence, and how contractors became aware of the SBLS program.
me aware of the SBLS program? [PROBE IF NOT MENTIONED: Were you recruited by the SBLS program staff? IF NO: Did you approach SBLS program staff about being their recycling contractor?] 45. What are your responsibilities with regards to the...
AI summary The text discusses the SBLS program and includes questions about the respondent's involvement, responsibilities, interactions with program staff and vendors, training received, and the recycling process. The SBLS program is being evaluated in the context of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.
sites, need to be recycled?] NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B21 a. Does the SBLI program require that all bulbs, replaced through the program, be recycled? IF NO: Why not? Are there additional incenti...
AI summary The text includes questions about the SBLS program, specifically regarding bulb recycling requirements, incentives for recycling, and the impact of the program on participating companies. It also asks about data tracking and contractor perceptions.