1 2. 2011 DSM RESULTS 2
AI summary The 2011 Demand Side Management (DSM) results are analyzed in this section, focusing on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) performance, Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) implementation, and oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). The proceeding evaluates energy efficiency outcomes and regulatory compliance under DSM programs.
2.3 2011 DSM Programs In its first full year of operation, ENSC built awareness as the new place for Nova Scotians to go for energy efficiency solutions, largely through the promotion of its programs, advertising, media opportunities and o...
AI summary ENSC expanded outreach through online presence and targeted low-income programs in 2011, exceeding energy savings targets and increasing participation. They provided free upgrades to renters and homeowners, achieving significant energy savings.
DATE FILED: February 27, 2012 Page 11 of 45 1 The Small Business Energy Solutions program completed lighting retrofits for 1468 customers in 2011, compared to 801 in 2010. Delivery agents have continued to build capacity, and a number of n...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions program completed lighting retrofits for 1468 customers in 2011, an increase from 801 in 2010. Delivery agents are expanding their capacity and planning to add non-lighting measures for implementation in 2012.
Through the Efficient Products program, CFLs and LED exit-sign lamps were installed for 4,595 businesses, non-profit and institutional customers in 2011. Additional efforts included a successful LED lighting pilot for applications not suit...
AI summary In 2011, the Efficient Products program installed energy-efficient lighting in 4,595 businesses and institutions. Additional initiatives included LED lighting pilots, program enhancements for compressed air systems and energy management systems, and outreach to specific customer segments. The Embedded Energy Manager program was piloted and will continue with dedicated support for large customers.
4. 2013-2015 DSM PLAN
AI summary The 2013-2015 DSM Plan outlines Demand Side Management initiatives under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework. Key stakeholders include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with focus on energy efficiency programs and regulatory oversight.
4.1 Summary ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan, presented in Appendix A, is a multi-year plan, which identifies proposed DSM programs, services, and strategies, and annual investment and energy savings targets, for 2013, 2014 and 2015. The plan bui...
AI summary ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan outlines multi-year energy efficiency strategies, including a customer-centric approach to simplify program access and increase participation. The plan emphasizes cultural shifts through public education, community engagement, and long-term behavior change to sustain energy savings. Education and outreach remain critical components of DSM initiatives.
Savings from Codes and Standards In addition to savings resulting from the 2013-2015 DSM Plan, ENSC is forecasting energy savings attributed to the adoption of new energy efficiency codes and standards as provided in Figure 4.6. ENSC's str...
AI summary ENSC is forecasting energy savings from the adoption of new energy efficiency codes and standards, in addition to savings from the 2013-2015 DSM Plan. This strategy is crucial for achieving long-term energy savings in Nova Scotia, with additional details provided in Appendix A.
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Report, Volume 1: Nova Scotia Power Inc. (July 2007), at pp 35-36. In 2012, ENSC has more experience with DSM in Nova Scotia, which is reflected in the 2013-2015 savings forecast. ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan co...
AI summary This text discusses ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan, highlighting achievements from CFL measures and the diminishing returns of further CFL installations. It emphasizes the need to build a culture of energy efficiency and the importance of education and outreach in Nova Scotia.
va Scotians' participation and to ultimately help change behaviour around energy efficiency, the Corporation is committed to education and outreach, with a DATE FILED: February 27, 2012 Page 27 of 45 growing emphasis on a more community-ba...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is committed to promoting energy efficiency through education, outreach, and a community-based approach. ENSC aims to provide individualized energy solutions and improve customer service. It also emphasizes collaboration with trade allies to strengthen the energy efficiency industry and promote energy-efficient codes and standards.
Dr. Peach states: One continuing need is development of provision for the safe disposal of CFLs (Request & Response IR-2). The marketing, promotion and installation of CFLs will eventually result in a large substitution of CFLs for less ef...
AI summary Dr. Peach highlights the need for safe disposal of CFLs, noting that their eventual replacement will create a significant hazardous waste issue. ENSC acknowledges the challenge but suggests recycling centers are outside the DSM program's scope, though they support initiatives that aid in CFL recycling. Current disposal methods include shipping fluorescent tubes for safe destruction.
1 ENSC's Response: As a point of clarification, the old fluorescent tubes from ENSC's Small Business Energy Solutions program are fully recycled, as opposed to being destructed in a standard bulb eater where its mercury-laden filter could...
AI summary ENSC clarifies that fluorescent tubes from its Small Business Energy Solutions program are fully recycled rather than destructed, with the recycling process involving specialized facilities in Quebec. The cost of full recycling in 2011 was approximately $300,000.
Background: A dual baseline approach calculates energy savings using a more complex method than is used by the majority of North American DSM administrators. Most jurisdictions use the effective useful life (EUL), or assumed average life o...
AI summary The text explains a dual baseline approach to calculating energy savings in demand-side management (DSM) programs, which uses both the effective useful life (EUL) of new measures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of replaced equipment. This method accounts for technological improvements over time and adjusts savings calculations accordingly.
t for ENSC to complete a more thorough analysis to determine if the implementation of a dual baseline approach is feasible. ENSC commits to the following tasks in 2012: baseline policy in Nova Scotia determine the programs in which early r...
AI summary The document outlines ENSC's commitment in 2012 to conduct a thorough analysis of implementing a dual baseline approach in Nova Scotia's energy efficiency programs, including assessing feasibility, benefits, costs, and lessons learned from other jurisdictions.
2.0 RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES The overarching objective for ENSC's residential sector electricity DSM initiatives is to help Nova Scotians achieve long-term energy savings by building energy efficiency and conservation consideratio...
AI summary ENSC's residential DSM initiatives aim to promote long-term energy savings through efficient lighting, appliances, and home energy education. Programs include product rebates, existing/new residential services, and energy-saving actions like home energy reports. Initiatives focus on behavioral change and peer comparison to drive conservation.
2.1 Efficient Product Rebates Financial incentives to offset the higher cost of efficient products, along with public awareness, education, and retail availability, are the foundation of Efficient Product Rebates. All homeowners and renter...
AI summary Efficient Product Rebates offer financial incentives for high-efficiency products, including ENERGY STAR® items, with eligibility for all residents. Low-income households may receive free installations. The Appliance Retirement program provides cash incentives and recycling for old refrigerators/freezers.
2.2 Existing Residential The Existing Residential service is designed to promote cost-effective energy efficiency improvements to Nova Scotia's housing stock of single detached houses, duplexes, rental housing, mobile/mini homes and multi-...
AI summary The Existing Residential program promotes energy efficiency in Nova Scotia's housing stock through incentives for lighting, water heating, and appliance upgrades. Enhancements include renter eligibility, direct low-cost measure installation, innovative financing, and contractor training. The Province of Nova Scotia funds non-electric rebates, while ENSC manages the program via contracted service organizations.
Low Income The Low Income Homeowners component builds on the existing program, providing free energy audits and turnkey implementation of energy efficiency measures at no cost to participants. Building envelope measures include upgrades su...
AI summary The Low Income Homeowners component provides free energy audits and implementation of energy efficiency measures for low-income households. It includes building envelope upgrades, appliance replacements, and customer education. Green heating systems are promoted to increase the use of renewable energy sources for heating. ENSC plans to develop qualified contractor lists and address barriers to adopting advanced technologies like automated pellet boilers.
2.3 New Residential awareness of this opportunity. The New Residential services are available to builders and owner/builders of new houses in Nova Scotia, to encourage the construction of high performance housing by promoting the use of en...
AI summary The New Residential program by ENSC aims to promote energy-efficient construction in Nova Scotia through incentives, design consultation, and marketing. It targets builders to exceed building code energy efficiency requirements, using EnerGuide ratings and tiered incentives. Collaboration with municipalities and CMHC is emphasized to enhance participation and mortgage eligibility.
2.4 Energy Saving Actions The Energy Saving Actions initiative being implemented in 2012 is known as the Home Energy Report and involves a combination of mailed information and an Internet portal. It may be continued for use in 2013 to 201...
AI summary The Home Energy Report initiative, launched in 2012, provides residential customers with feedback on their energy consumption to encourage behavioural changes and energy savings. The program may be expanded through smart meters, other platforms, and enhanced messaging, and is expected to increase participation in other ENSC residential services.
Customers will have the option of completing an online or mail-in questionnaire about their home, which will allow ENSC to provide more customized recommendations. 1 3.0 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES FOR BUSINESSES, NON-PROFIT AND 2 INSTITUTIONAL...
AI summary ENSC is updating its terminology for customer segments, using 'Business, Non-profit and Institutional' (BNI) to more accurately describe sectors like healthcare and education, previously categorized as Commercial and Industrial (C&I). Customers can complete a questionnaire for customized recommendations.
3.1 Efficient Product Rebates The Efficient Product Rebates category is intended to secure cost-effective electrical energy savings for customers in the retrofit and new construction markets, through promotion and rebates on high-efficienc...
AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates program, managed by ENSC, aims to reduce energy costs for customers through rebates and financing for high-efficiency equipment. It combines the Business Energy Rebates (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs in 2012, targeting retrofit and new construction markets. BER offers prescriptive rebates for reliable energy-saving equipment, focusing on sectors like lighting, HVAC, and refrigeration, with eligibility for businesses and multi-unit residential buildings.
3.2 Custom Incentives The Custom program is designed to secure cost-effective electrical energy savings from energy efficiency projects and to promote efficient fuel choices in new construction projects as well as existing facilities. The...
AI summary The Custom Incentives program helps customers achieve energy savings through tailored energy efficiency projects. It supports engineering studies, upgrades, and the installation of energy-efficient products not covered by standard rebate structures. Eligible measures include system upgrades and green heating systems, with incentives based on energy savings and design efficiency.
1 Measures are categorized as: 2 3 market-driven measures, such as equipment replacement, new 4 construction, renovation and expansion, where the program can result in 5 higher efficiency choices than would otherwise have been purchased...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures, including market-driven and discretionary retrofit initiatives, and highlights the role of technical and financial services in supporting these efforts. It also mentions the continuation of the Custom program, which focuses on tailored offerings and technical expertise development.
3.3 Direct Installation In the Direct Installation category, the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program is designed to acquire electrical energy savings through the direct installation of energy-efficient measures for small busines...
AI summary The Direct Installation category under the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program focuses on acquiring electrical energy savings through direct installation of energy-efficient measures for small businesses. The program includes lighting retrofits, refrigeration upgrades, and other energy-efficient measures, with incentives covering up to 80% of project costs.
1 4.0 ENABLING STRATEGIES 2 3 Enabling Strategies include the following elements: 4 5 Education and Outreach 6 Development and Research 7 Innovative Financing 8 Capacity Building 9 Working with Governments 10 11 Enabling Strategi...
AI summary Enabling Strategies include Education and Outreach, Development and Research, Innovative Financing, Capacity Building, and Working with Governments. These strategies aim to support energy savings through ENSC's DSM services and drive market transformation by changing industry practices through training, labeling, and regulation.
4.3 Innovative Financing ENSC recognizes that a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. ENSC's objective is to deliver innovative financing to remove this barrier and increase participatio...
AI summary ENSC aims to provide innovative financing to overcome upfront capital barriers for energy efficiency, particularly in the Existing Residential program, including green heating systems, offering various financing options for residential and commercial customers.
develop capacity to meet future needs 1 ENSC is evaluating several financing options, including potential opportunities to 30 already seen, and expects to see, continued growth in local energy 31 efficiency industries that supply products...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) is evaluating financing options to meet future energy efficiency needs and expects growth in local energy efficiency industries. ENSC aims to provide customers with access to knowledgeable contractors and the ability to identify energy-efficient technologies, building on experiences from DSM administrators in jurisdictions like Vermont and Oregon.
REGULATORY OVERSIGHT – A BALANCED APPROACH FOR EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA Prepared by PHILIPPE DUNSKY, PRESIDENT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Submitted to: EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION January 24th, 2012
AI summary A document prepared by Philippe Dunskey of Dunsky Energy Consulting and submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on January 24, 2012, outlines a balanced approach to regulatory oversight for energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia.
ABOUT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specialized in the design, analysis and implementation of successful energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and policies. Our clients include leading...
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specializing in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. They serve utilities, government agencies, private firms, and non-profits in Canada and the U.S., focusing on policy design, analysis, and implementation.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Philippe Dunsky has 20 years of experience in the fields of energy efficiency and renewable energy (EE/RE) programs, plans and policies. Throughout much of his career, he has provided analytical support and strategic couns...
AI summary Philippe Dunsky has 20 years of experience in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, providing analytical support and strategic counsel to utilities, government agencies, private firms, and non-profits across North America.
MANDATE Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) has tasked us with reviewing the current regulatory oversight model and proposing changes that may be useful toward improving the Corporation's ability to assist Nova Scotians in saving ene...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is reviewing the current regulatory oversight model to enhance its ability to improve energy efficiency in Nova Scotia. The review aims to ensure recommendations do not hinder the UARB and stakeholders from tracking ENSC's performance. Consultations with ENSC's Board of Directors, management, and stakeholders in November and December 2011 informed the recommendations.
2. MARKET CREDIBILITY For ENSC to succeed in transforming markets toward greater energy efficiency, it will need to convince a wide array of market actors to invest in new business lines, procurement processes, and other ventures. For exam...
AI summary ENSC requires market actors to invest in training and certification programs for energy efficiency, including retrofit contractors, HVAC vendors, and building professionals. Success depends on sustained demand for these services, necessitating collaboration with educational institutions and private training organizations.
CRITERIA: PERFORMANCE DRIVERS LATITUDE OVERSIGHT Components No D isin ce nti ve s Inc en tiv es Re so urc es Re sp on siv en es s Ab ilit y t o C om mi t Tra ns pa ren cy Sa feg ua rds Inf lue nc e Co st Examples Are profits unaffected by...
AI summary The document evaluates the performance drivers and oversight criteria for Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC), focusing on incentives, resources, transparency, and cost considerations. It notes that ENSC has no sales disincentives, has a budget on the higher end of the typical range, and has moved to a 3-year approval process with some long-term predictability still missing.
classes. In order to allocate cost to the electricity and other fuel mandates within the ENSC CAM, ENSC's accounts have been divided into several categories that require different allocation methods: - 1. Direct Program Cost Accounts: A fe...
AI summary ENSC divides its accounts into two categories for cost allocation: Direct Program Cost Accounts (e.g., SBES Recovery) and Joint Direct Program Cost Accounts (e.g., marketing expenses for C&I). Costs are allocated based on invoice details or broad-based allocators when specific data is unavailable. ENSC aims to improve data accuracy to minimize broad-based allocations.
100.0% TABLE 2 b) (2014) Preliminary Estimate of DSM Program participation by rate class after accounting for the Municipal Class COLUMN A B C D K L M R S T Program co sts incurred or n participatir ng rate classe S - - New Efficient Home...
AI summary The table provides a breakdown of DSM program participation rates across various rate classes in Nova Scotia, showing high participation in residential programs and low participation in industrial and large general classes. It also includes the relative shares of municipal sales by sector.
E-ENSC-R-12 Line# 1 ABLE 1 (2015) Alloca ation of 25% of p rogram cos ts associated with system ben efits Existing New Homes Constructi Efficient products Home Energy Report Prescriptive Custom Small Business Education & Outreach Developme...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing the allocation of program costs associated with system benefits in 2015, including various categories such as efficient products, home energy reports, and education & outreach. The table includes figures for different program categories and their respective costs.
COLUMN A B C D E F G H I J F Relative sha res of program costs incurred on partic pating rate classe s before Muni cipal Class Existing New Efficient Home Energy Education & Development Other Enabling Program Homes Construction Products Re...
AI summary The table presents the distribution of program costs across various rate classes in Nova Scotia, showing the relative shares of costs incurred by different categories such as residential, small general, and industrial. It highlights the breakdown of costs for programs like Efficient Homes, Home Energy Report, and Education & Outreach.
COLUMN A B C D E F G M N O Program cost s incurred on p articipating rate classes Home Other New Efficient Energy Small Education & Development Enabling Program Existing Homes Construction Products Report Prescriptive Custom Business Outre...
AI summary The table presents the distribution of program costs incurred on participating rate classes across various energy efficiency programs. It highlights the percentage of costs associated with different program categories, such as Home Energy Report, Prescriptive, Custom, and Enabling Strategies, for different rate classes including Residential, Small General, and Industrial.
Detailed Review of completed energy efficiency projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation October 17, 2011
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) conducted a detailed review of completed energy efficiency projects at New Page in Port Hawkesbury, focusing on project outcomes and compliance with regulatory standards.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the period of January to March, 2011 Energy Performance Services (EPS/Canada) Inc. ("EPS) carried out a preliminary review of energy efficiency projects undertaken at the New Page Port Hawkesbury ("NPPH") and Abiti...
AI summary Energy Performance Services conducted a detailed M&V of energy efficiency projects at NPPH and a preliminary analysis at ABL. Using the SEP M&V Protocol and IPMVP guidelines, they estimate annual energy savings of 154.2 GWh and average electricity demand savings of 17.8 MW at NPPH.
2. MILL CONFIGURATION WITH KEY PROCESS UNITS Figure 1 below shows the NPPH mill schematic with the main operating units (the "FACILITY"). From a production point of view, the key operating units are: (a) the TMP plant (includes the bleach...
AI summary The document describes the configuration of the NPPH mill, highlighting key process units such as the TMP plant, paper machines, and power boilers. It notes that PB3 has been sold to NSPI and is being modernized as part of the Biogen Project, which will generate 60 MW of electricity for the provincial grid and reduce waste steam venting.
3. PROJECTS CONSIDERED While NPPH is always in the process of continuous improvement with respect to energy and other raw materials consumption, only a limited number of projects were considered as part of the INITIAL REPORT. These were es...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency projects considered in the INITIAL REPORT and M&V REPORT, noting that only a limited number of projects were included and others were excluded due to lack of savings. Projects not producing savings were omitted from Table 3.
Table 4 – Reporting periods and standard conditions Year Period Start Period End Paper actual avg. TMP actual avg. Tonnes/ yr & day ADMT/ yr & day Yr 1 Jun 1, 2007 Jun 30, 2008 515,842 1,413.3 435,250 1,193.5 Yr 2-3 Jul 1, 2008 Jun 29, 201...
AI summary The text discusses the use of statistical analysis and modeling techniques, specifically the IPMVP framework, to evaluate energy consumption. It mentions the use of top-down and bottom-up approaches, such as the 'whole facility' and 'retrofit isolation' methods, and highlights the construction of mathematical models using multi-variable linear regression in Excel 2007 to analyze energy consumption and related variables.
4.2Analysis Procedure For the purposes of the various analyses required to carry out our mandate, we have built a data model using daily time weighted average numbers for a large number of process parameters at the NPPH mill. The data set...
AI summary The analysis procedure involves building a data model using daily time-weighted average numbers for process parameters at the NPPH mill over a four-year period. A multi-variable linear regression analysis tool is used to develop statistically rigorous models for energy consumption, with results provided in Appendix-3 of the M&V REPORT.
4.3Data analyzed As discussed, EPS obtained daily averages for key operating and energy consumption variables for at least one full year prior to the start of each energy efficiency project studied and one year following the implementation...
AI summary The analysis used data from NPPH's PI historian and NSPI's billing data, validated by Alexander Allen and Mark Frith. Discrepancies were noted but data was accepted. Projects include Line 1 Refiner Replacement, Line 3 Optimization, and others, with data limitations for Noss Cleaners and PM2 projects.
4.4Period of Analysis, Energy & Conditions Since TMP refining energy (electricity) consumption represents a full two-thirds of the NPPH mill's electric consumption a first analysis was done on TMP refining energy. Because of its relative i...
AI summary The analysis focuses on TMP refining energy consumption, which constitutes two-thirds of NPPH's electric use. Detailed records from NPPH enabled statistical analysis, with data collected from mid-2007 to establish a baseline before energy efficiency projects starting in mid-2009. A model linking refining energy to production was developed, resulting in a CUSUM chart (Figure 7) to monitor trends.
Table 4 (repeated) – Reporting periods and standard conditions for production. Year Period Start Period End Paper actual avg. TMP actual avg. Tonnes/ yr & day ADMT/ yr & day Yr 1 Jun 1, 2007 Jun 30, 2008 515,842 1,413.3 435,250 1,193.5 Yr...
AI summary The text discusses standard conditions for production reporting periods and the use of a fixed Paper/TMP ratio of 1.131 to quantify avoided energy use rather than absolute energy savings. It also mentions the use of a 10°C standard condition for total mill electrical consumption regressions.
4.9Adherence to IPMVP analysis and reporting principles
AI summary Section 4.9 discusses adherence to IPMVP (International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol) analysis and reporting principles within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, emphasizing compliance with standardized energy efficiency measurement protocols.
Conservativeness Bottom-up estimates tend to be quite conservative, notably because they don't capture all the small efficiency projects that we know have been occurring at NPPH. Top-down estimates tend to be close to reality because they...
AI summary Bottom-up estimates are more conservative as they miss small efficiency projects at NPPH, while top-down estimates use real data and are closer to reality. Estimates reflect avoided energy costs, not absolute savings.
Table 5 – Output from Importance of Factors Analysis Coefficient Factor Product Percent Intercept -20.064 1499 -30076 -11% Avg. refining load (MW) 1.265 180938 228846 84% Total paper production (tonnes/d) 0.013 2077764 27123 10% TMP plant...
AI summary The analysis in Table 5 shows that TMP plant outlet freeness is not a significant predictor of mill energy consumption, while refining load is the most significant factor. The coefficients and percentages highlight the relationship between various factors and electricity consumption.
Table 7 – Multi-variable Regression Statistical Fit Indicators and Importance Factors for NPPH's Total Electrical Consumption Period 2 R Standard Importance factor / P-Value Deviation Paper Production TMP production Temperature (MW) (tonne...
AI summary Table 7 presents multi-variable regression statistical fit indicators and importance factors for NPPH's total electrical consumption across different periods. The standard deviation of energy consumption is relatively high, ranging from 13.87 to 17.00 MW, which is 7-10% of the average total mill load, indicating significant variability in energy use.
Table 8 – Top-down savings estimate, standard conditions: 1,400 t/d of paper, 10°C, 365 days/yr # Projects that came on-line during period (with start date) Mill annual GWh Avg. MW Yr 1 Baseline 1,697.7 193.9 Optimize Line 3 (Summer 2008)...
AI summary Table 8 provides a top-down savings estimate based on energy consumption data from a paper mill, comparing baseline energy usage in Year 1 to consumption in Year 4 after various energy efficiency projects were implemented.
6. ANALYSIS OF PROJECT RESULTS One of the key requirements of the SEP M&V protocol is that top-down energy performance for facilities be calculated and then "sanity-checked" against aggregated bottom-up calculations of individual Energy Co...
AI summary The analysis emphasizes the SEP M&V protocol's requirement to cross-verify top-down energy performance calculations with bottom-up Energy Conservation Measure aggregations, ensuring accuracy in evaluating Nova Scotia's energy efficiency projects.
Table 9 - Summary of key statistical factors, TMP energy regressions Series Period 2 R Standard Importance factor / P-value Deviation Intercept Paper TMP Temp (°K) (MW) production Prodcution With Yr 1 .745 11.4 -7%/.664 28%/9E-25 83%/1E-68...
AI summary Table 9 presents statistical factors from energy regression analyses at the TMP plant, showing that removing temperature from the model does not affect the R² or standard deviation. The standard deviation remains between 11.4-12.3 MW, representing about 10% of the average refining load, indicating inherent variability in refining energy.
The importance factor, expressed as a percentage (either positive or negative), is the relative weight that a factor has in the regression equation. Regardless of the sign, an importance factor which is less than 1% is indicative that a fa...
AI summary The text discusses the use of importance factors and P-values in statistical analysis to determine the significance of variables in regression equations. It notes that ambient temperature and the Year 4 intercept are not statistically significant. It also highlights increased refining energy variability in Year 4 due to differences in specific energy consumption across refining lines and operational efficiency considerations.
herefore more efficient to run TMP lines as hard as possible and shut them down when they are not required than to reduce production over a longer period to meet a specified paper machine requirement. Coupled with the observation that the...
AI summary The TMP lines should be operated at maximum capacity and shut down when not needed, rather than reducing production over time to meet paper machine requirements. The increased importance factor for paper production in Year 4 indicates greater flexibility in production levels due to the Line 1 modernization project, allowing better load management and taking advantage of load shedding during high power prices.
mmon operating conditions. Figure 12 – Graphical representation of the statistical models TMP plant refining energy vs production – at a fixed Paper/TMP ratio of 1.131 Table 10- Bottom-up savings estimate, standard conditions: 1,237.8 ADMT...
AI summary The text includes a figure and table related to energy efficiency and production at the TMP plant, highlighting statistical models and bottom-up savings estimates under standard operating conditions.
# Project Title Year started Bottom Up estimate based on statistical energy analysis _ ed INITIAL F estimate GWh MW GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 53.4 6.1 63.9 7.3 2 Optimize Line 3 Production Mid 2009 FO C C 0 9.8 1.1 3 Optimize Re...
AI summary The table presents energy savings estimates for various projects, including upgrades and optimizations, with details on the year started, energy savings in GWh and MW, and initial estimates. Project 4 was not completed, and totals are provided both including and excluding it.
8. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The top-down electricity savings estimate for the whole mill described in Section-5 of this Report is consistent with the M&V requirements defined in the SEP M&V Protocol and meets all the IPMVP criteria (a...
AI summary The top-down electricity savings estimate for the NPPH mill aligns with SEP M&V Protocol and IPMVP criteria, validating its accuracy. It closely matches the initial report but may overstate savings due to limited bottom-up data. The analysis concludes the top-down method provides a reliable energy savings representation.
GREEN HEATING SYSTEMS INITIATIVE OVERVIEW FOR ENSC'S 2013-2015 DSM PLAN Prepared by PHILIPPE DUNSKY, PRESIDENT FRANÇOIS BOULANGER, SENIOR CONSULTANT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Submitted to: EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION January 31 th ,...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems Initiative is part of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) 2013-2015 Demand Side Management (DSM) plan, aiming to promote energy-efficient heating systems. Prepared by Dunsky Energy Consulting and submitted to ENSC on January 31, 2012, the document outlines the initiative's role in advancing energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia.
ABOUT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specialized in the design, analysis and implementation of successful energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and policies. Our clients include leading...
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specializing in energy efficiency and renewable energy program design, analysis, and implementation. They serve utilities, government agencies, private firms, and non-profits across Canada and the U.S.
OBJECTIVES Green Heating Systems, which we have defined to include systems that deliver all or most of their heat directly from renewable resources, have the potential to deliver significant benefits to Nova Scotia, including electricity s...
AI summary The document outlines the objectives of introducing Green Heating Systems (GHS) to address gaps in ENSC's existing programs. Current initiatives like EnerGuide for Houses focus on comprehensive home improvements, leaving opportunities unmet for homes with minor issues. The GHS initiative aims to create new channels through incentives, training, and marketing, targeting electricity savings while using non-DSM funds for other components.
1 - Green Heating Systems Heating System Renewable Source Renewable Heat Loads served Solar Thermal Sun 100% Part Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHP) Earth ~75% Full Ductless Air Source Heat Pumps (DHP) Air ~60% Part Air Source Heat Pumps (ASH...
AI summary The document outlines various green heating systems, including solar thermal, ground source heat pumps, and air source heat pumps, along with their renewable sources, heat percentages, and load served. It also mentions target markets for these systems.
1- Electric Space Heating Households - by channel and heat distribution systems As can be seen, the vast majority of Nova Scotia's electrically heated homes are not being reached by the existing comprehensive energy efficiency programs, an...
AI summary The text highlights that most electrically heated homes in Nova Scotia are not covered by existing energy efficiency programs, with many using zoned baseboard heating systems. Table 2 provides a qualitative assessment of market potential by technology and heat distribution system.
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA The Green Heating Systems initiative will strive to promote only the most efficient systems within each technology area. To do so, it will adopt, where feasible, specific performance requirements based on independent,...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative aims to promote efficient heating technologies by adopting third-party performance criteria where feasible. ENSC will collaborate with industry and government to develop standards if existing criteria are lacking or unsuitable for Nova Scotia. Table 3 outlines current and proposed system requirements.
3 - Green Heating Systems Requirements Technologies Existing Requirements for Eligibility Requirements to be Developed Solar Thermal None TBD Ground Source Heat Pumps (GHP) Conforms to CAN/CSA-448. Installation certified by CGC. Ductless A...
AI summary This section outlines the existing and proposed requirements for green heating systems, including technologies such as solar thermal, ground source heat pumps, ductless air source heat pumps, and pellet stoves. It notes that some requirements are still under development.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS While most of the targeted Green Heating Systems are readily available in Nova Scotia, this is not the case of whole-house, fully-automated pellet boilers and furnaces. In keeping with the recommendations of our previo...
AI summary The initiative focuses on promoting Green Heating Systems, including a pilot project for whole-house pellet boilers and furnaces, and developing third-party pellet supply services. It also emphasizes awareness of energy-saving opportunities like heating maintenance, home weatherization, and whole-house approaches, leveraging ENSC's existing programs.
KEY COMPONENTS
AI summary The document outlines key components of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia, including acronyms related to energy management, utility regulation, and efficiency programs. It provides definitions for terms used in proceedings involving energy conservation, cost recovery, and utility oversight.
CHANNELS The Green Heating Systems initiative will focus primarily on existing HVAC channels, as well as on direct marketing to homes heated with electric baseboard, to promote Green Heating Systems. In order to add additional value, the i...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative targets existing HVAC channels and homes with electric baseboard heating, promoting ENSC's EnerGuide for Houses and Performance Plus programs with enhanced incentives.
SAVINGS 2013 2014 2015 Gross Savings (Incr. Ann.) 1st Yr Electricity Svgs (MWh) 20,330 25,391 30,816 Levelized-Lifetime (MWh) 230,543 290,735 358,749 Net Savings (Incr. Ann) 1st Yr Electricity Svgs (MWh) 10,150 12,768 15,664 Levelized-Life...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative demonstrates cost-effectiveness with a benefit-cost ratio exceeding 2.8 and passing both the Total Resource Cost and Program Administrator Cost tests, indicating that for every dollar invested by ENSC, there is approximately $3 in savings.
Executive Summary The results of the 2011 Socket Study indicate that approximately one-half of all bulbs in Nova Scotia are energy efficient CFL or LED. Overall, residents of Nova Scotia report having an average of 26 permanent light fixtu...
AI summary The 2011 Socket Study found that ~50% of Nova Scotia bulbs are energy efficient (CFL/LED), with residents averaging 19 energy-efficient bulbs. Regular bulbs dominate permanent fixtures (48%) and outdoor lights (50%), while CFLs are common in indoor lighting. LED use is low (<4% in indoor bulbs). Replacement intentions vary, with 40% planning to upgrade, but uncertainty around LEDs. Verification showed discrepancies between survey and in-home data on regular bulb counts.
Detailed Analysis
AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia's energy sector, focusing on DSM programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and efficiency initiatives. Key entities include NSPI, ENSC, and UARB, with discussions on TRC, PAC, and IRP frameworks.
Walked Around Home to Count Number of Light Bulbs
AI summary The document references an individual's action of walking around their home to count light bulbs, potentially related to energy efficiency assessments or Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives. This activity may inform regulatory proceedings involving energy conservation measures, cost recovery, or program evaluation under Nova Scotia's energy management framework.
Energy Efficiency Approximately one-half of all bulbs in Nova Scotia are energy efficient CFL or LED. LED bulbs are the least common of all bulb types. Overall, residents of Nova Scotia report having an average of 26 permanent light fixtur...
AI summary Approximately half of all bulbs in Nova Scotia are energy efficient CFL or LED. LED bulbs are the least common. Residents have an average of 26 permanent light fixture bulbs, 6 plug-in lamp bulbs, and 4 outdoor light bulbs, with a mix of regular, CFL, and LED bulbs across different types.
Energy Efficient Number of bulbs found in Overall Regular Bulbs CFL Bulbs LED Bulbs Permanent Light Fixture Bulbs 26 13 12 1 Plug-in Lamp Bulbs 6 3 3 0 Outdoor Light Bulbs 4 2 1 1 \ NOTE: Figures rounded to nearest whole number
AI summary The table presents the distribution of different types of light bulbs (regular, CFL, and LED) found in various lighting fixtures across Nova Scotia. It shows the number of bulbs in permanent light fixtures, plug-in lamps, and outdoor lights, highlighting the prevalence of regular and CFL bulbs over LED bulbs.
Permanent Light Fixture Bulbs Light Bulb Type Residents Most Likely to Use More Regular bulbs (over 50% of permanent light fixture bulbs) • Rent residence • Live in apartment • 55 years or older • Heat home with oil or electricity CFL (ove...
AI summary The document categorizes permanent light fixture bulb usage by type (regular, CFL, LED) and resident characteristics, such as residence type, age, heating source, and income level. It highlights demographic trends in bulb usage, particularly for CFL bulbs.
Energy Efficient Plug-in Lamp Bulbs Plug-in lamp bulbs are less common than permanent light fixture bulbs. The usage of energy efficient bulbs is more commonplace in households of middle-aged residents, and among those who heat their homes...
AI summary Plug-in lamp bulbs are less common than permanent fixtures, with energy-efficient bulbs more prevalent in middle-aged households and alternative heating users. Most plug-in lamps use a mix of regular and CFL bulbs, while LED adoption remains low (Tables A6a-d).
Outdoor Light Bulb Types Energy efficient light bulbs are used more commonly by residents who own their dwelling (instead of renting), and among Nova Scotians who use energy sources other than electricity or oil to heat their homes. The fo...
AI summary The document discusses factors influencing the adoption of energy-efficient outdoor light bulbs in Nova Scotia, noting higher usage among homeowners and residents using non-electric/oil heating. A table outlines resident characteristics correlated with specific bulb types, highlighting ownership and heating source impacts.
Outdoor Light Bulbs Light Bulb Type Residents Most Likely to Use More Regular bulbs (over 50% of outdoor light bulbs) • Do not own residence • Use oil or electricity to heat home • Live in an apartment CFL (over 50% of outdoor light bulbs)...
AI summary The text discusses the usage patterns of different types of outdoor light bulbs, highlighting the demographics most likely to use regular, CFL, and LED bulbs. It provides a breakdown of factors such as residence ownership, heating methods, and employment status that correlate with bulb type usage.
Light Bulb Count and Usage
AI summary The document section titled 'Light Bulb Count and Usage' appears to focus on analyzing data related to the number and usage patterns of light bulbs, likely in the context of energy efficiency initiatives or regulatory assessments in Nova Scotia. No detailed content is provided in the excerpt.
Intentions to Implement Energy Efficient Light Bulbs Up to one-half of residents intend to replace non-efficient bulbs in the next year with energy efficient light bulbs. In order to assess their intentions to improve the energy efficiency...
AI summary Survey data indicates 39% of residents plan to replace inefficient bulbs with energy-efficient ones, with 50% targeting CFLs and 26% LED. Uncertainty is high (34% unsure for general replacements, 44% for LEDs). Only 27% will not replace bulbs, showing mixed consumer intent towards energy efficiency.
Household Will Replace Light Bulb Types With… (% Saying Yes, applies) In terms of replacing one light fixture with one that is more energy efficient, the only population difference that emerged was for residents who heat their home with oi...
AI summary The document examines household willingness to replace light bulbs with energy-efficient alternatives, noting that residents heating with oil are less likely to do so than those using electricity. Owners are more likely than non-owners to replace bulbs with CFLs, and higher-income households show greater intent to adopt energy-efficient lighting. Apartment dwellers are less likely to replace bulbs than those in single-family homes.
In-Home Verification Visits As mentioned in the Introduction, a total of 50 in-home verification visits were made among survey respondents, to count the actual number of bulbs within surveyed households. A comparison of survey versus verif...
AI summary A total of 50 in-home verification visits were conducted to compare survey responses with actual bulb counts in households. Survey respondents significantly underestimated the number of regular light bulbs in permanent fixtures, but their responses closely matched verification results for CFL and LED bulbs.
Panel vs. Site Visit Analysis CFL Regular LED Panel Survey Site Visit Diff erence Panel Survey Site Visit Diff erence Panel Survey Site Visit Diff erence Permanent 14.3 14.8 ↑0.5 13.2 24.1 ↑10.9 1.5 .3 ↓1.2 Plug-in 3.7 3.8 ↑0.1 2.6 4.8 ↑2....
AI summary The text presents a comparison between panel survey results and site visit data for Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), including differences in measurements for permanent, plug-in, and outdoor lighting. It highlights variations in performance metrics between the two methods.
Mean scores suggest that panel members accurately count the number of CFL bulbs in their home. That said, 34 percent underestimated their number of permanent CFL bulbs by at least three bulbs, and 23 percent overestimated by the same amoun...
AI summary The analysis indicates that while most panel members accurately count their permanent CFL bulbs, a significant portion (34%) underestimated and 23% overestimated by at least three bulbs. Most residents correctly estimate their outdoor or plug-in CFL bulbs.
Reasons to Change
AI summary The document outlines reasons for changing energy programs and regulatory approaches in Nova Scotia, emphasizing updates to Demand Side Management (DSM) frameworks, cost recovery mechanisms, and efficiency initiatives. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). Topics involve regulatory review, program cost allocation, and energy efficiency measures.
Full Conversion - Rebates for new central heating system and installation - Natural gas = 30% rebate (with cap) - Wood / Pellet = 40-60% rebate (with cap) - Up to $6,500 in additional rebates to remove electric and install new distribution...
AI summary The document outlines rebate programs under Full Conversion, including 30% rebates for natural gas heating systems (capped), 40-60% for wood/pellet systems (capped), up to $6,500 for removing electric distribution systems, and $750 for new domestic water heating systems. These incentives aim to promote energy-efficient upgrades.
Results to Date - 25% of installations completed - Anticipate 400 installations - Projected 2011 result = 1.8 GWh savings
AI summary 25% of planned installations are completed, with 400 total anticipated. Projected 2011 energy savings are 1.8 GWh. Progress updates are provided without specific entity references.
Green Schools Nova Scotia Laura Sinclair ENSC Program Manager DSM Stakeholder Consultation Session November 3, 2011
AI summary A DSM stakeholder consultation session on November 3, 2011, led by Laura Sinclair of ENSC, focused on Green Schools Nova Scotia initiatives. The session aimed to discuss energy efficiency programs and demand-side management strategies in Nova Scotia.
• Key Learnings: - Awareness of inefficiencies and waste - Sustainability - Energy efficiency, food sources, grounds, operations, procurement, transportation, water and waste - Teamwork, leadership - Stewardship, active citizenship
AI summary The key learnings emphasize awareness of inefficiencies, sustainability across energy, operations, and procurement, along with teamwork, leadership, and stewardship. Themes focus on reducing waste, promoting sustainable practices, and fostering active citizenship.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes Laura Sinclair ENSC Program Manager DSM Stakeholder Consultation Session November 3, 2011
AI summary A DSM Stakeholder Consultation Session held on November 3, 2011, involving Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and its Program Manager Laura Sinclair, discussing demonstration homes and energy efficiency initiatives under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework.
Allan Crandlemire CEO, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are two great projects that will help educate Nova Scotians on how to use energy better. The remarkable design and construction of the...
AI summary Allan Crandlemire, CEO of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlights the success of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes in promoting energy-efficient, affordable housing. He emphasizes the role of programs like Performance Plus in making energy efficiency achievable for homeowners, builders, and architects, aiming to make efficient homes the norm in Nova Scotia.
The Future of Housing in Nova Scotia I n the fall of 2010, Effi ciency Nova Scoti a and the Nova Scoti a Home Builders' Associati on (NSHBA) issued a challenge to Nova Scoti an architects and home designers to design an aff ordable energy...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) and the Nova Scotia Home Builders' Association (NSHBA) launched a competition for energy-efficient home designs with a minimum EnerGuide rating of 92. Denim Homes Inc. won the design contest, and both Denim and Whitestone Builders were selected to construct demonstration homes using different foundation options.
R-2000: Giving back to Homeowners Energy efficient homes constantly reduce their owner's carbon footprint and save them money from the day they are complete. Not only do energy efficient homes save money in energy costs through their lifes...
AI summary Energy-efficient homes reduce carbon footprint and save money, with Performance Plus rebates available for those meeting EnerGuide standards.
PerformancePlus Program In Nova Scotia, based on the building code, a home following the performance path must reach an EnerGuide rating of 80. Made available to anyone building a new home in the province, PerformancePlus is Nova Scotia's...
AI summary Nova Scotia's PerformancePlus Program encourages energy-efficient home building by requiring an EnerGuide rating of 80 and offering rebates based on a home's energy performance, with higher ratings leading to greater incentives.
What is the EnerGuide Rating System? EnerGuide is an energy scale used to measure the efficiency of new homes and all R-2000 homes must have a minimum rating of 80. New homeowners qualify for monetary rebates with an EnerGuide rating above...
AI summary The EnerGuide Rating System measures the energy efficiency of new homes, with R-2000 homes requiring a minimum rating of 80. Homeowners with ratings above 83 are eligible for monetary rebates.
The Performance Plus rebates pertaining to an EnerGuide rating are as follows: EnerGuide Rating Rebate 83 and 84 $3000 85 to 87 $5000 88 and above $7000 Other mechanical systems facilitate additional rebates. In fact, monetary incentives a...
AI summary The Performance Plus program offers rebates based on EnerGuide ratings, with higher ratings qualifying for larger rebates. Additional rebates are available for energy-efficient mechanical systems, helping homeowners reduce energy costs.
Some of the mechanical systems that qualify for an additional rebate include: Mechanical System Rebate Heat pump $900-1200 Drain water heat recovery $130 Solar domestic hot water $1250 Programmable thermostats $15 Efficient Lighting $100 \...
AI summary The document lists mechanical systems that qualify for additional rebates, including heat pumps, drain water heat recovery, solar domestic hot water, programmable thermostats, and efficient lighting, along with the corresponding rebate amounts.
EnerGuide 80 vs. EnerGuide 92+ The minimum standard for an R-2000 home is an EnerGuide rating of 80. Many homeowners work to achieve this minimum standard without considering the added benefit in exceeding it with additional energy efficie...
AI summary The document compares EnerGuide 80 (minimum standard) and EnerGuide 92+ (demonstration homes), highlighting that exceeding the minimum standard yields significant long-term energy savings. While initial costs for energy-efficient homes are higher, monthly savings offset these expenses. The text emphasizes environmental benefits and long-term financial value of energy-efficient upgrades.
Demonstration Home Profile: EnerGuide Rating: 94
AI summary The Demonstration Home Profile features an EnerGuide Rating of 94, indicating high energy efficiency. This rating is part of the EnerGuide for Houses (EGH) program, reflecting compliance with national energy performance standards.
About the home... The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Home in Dartmouth is a single family detached home located on a corner lot on Viridian Drive in the Willow Ridge subdivision. This fourbedroom, 3 1/2 bathroom R-2000 home has more...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Home in Dartmouth is a 3,300 sq ft R-2000 home showcasing energy-efficient design with features like natural gas heating and a walk-in pantry. It serves as a model for sustainable residential construction in Nova Scotia.
Additional Features: - Triple glazed windows (facing south) - A drain water heat recovery (DWHR) system - Comprehensive automated monitoring system - Natural gas hookup for appliances and fireplace - Cork flooring and SmartStrand carpet -...
AI summary The document outlines building features including triple glazed windows, drain water heat recovery systems, automated monitoring, natural gas hookup, cork flooring, mechanical shutters, CFL/LED lighting, and an instant hot water system, emphasizing energy efficiency and advanced technology integration.
Wall Design Both Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are built with a unique wall design that creates a complete thermal break between the interior and exterior of the home. The wall structure is built with 2"x10" top and bottom pla...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes feature a wall design with 2x10 plates and staggered 2x4 studs, creating a thermal break and preventing heat/cold conduction. The design allows for additional insulation, reduces moisture condensation, and includes large window ledges for aesthetic and functional benefits.
Windows The windows installed in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes contribute to the overall R-value of the home, in turn adding to the homes' energy efficiency. Most are triple glazed/paned, low-E argon windows. These windows...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes use triple-glazed low-E argon windows on the north side to retain heat and double-glazed low-E argon windows on the south, east, and west sides to capture solar heat. Aerosol spray foam ensures an airtight envelope, enhancing energy efficiency through optimal window placement and materials.
Wall Insulation The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are insulated with a fibrous material known as cellulose, made completely out of recycled materials. Cellulose is mostly comprised of recycled newsprint and fire retardant mate...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes use cellulose insulation made from recycled newsprint and fire retardant materials for wall, attic, and roof insulation. The text explains how this material is applied in demonstration homes for energy efficiency purposes.
Drain Water Heat Recovery In the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes even the drain water contributes to their energy efficiency. The heat from all drain water is used to further heat the domestic water supply in the home. This simp...
AI summary The document explains how Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR) systems in Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes use heat from drain water to preheat domestic water, reducing energy costs and enhancing energy efficiency. The system uses a copper pipe to transfer heat from drain water to the domestic supply line, eliminating additional energy costs for heating water.
Solar Hot Water Another great feature of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes is the solar boiler domestic hot water system, which uses solar energy to heat the potable water used in the homes for showers, sinks, laundry, dishes...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes utilize solar boiler domestic hot water systems with solar panels and PV-powered pumps. A traditional hot water tank serves as backup, while the Sackville Home includes an in-floor radiant heat system using excess heated water for additional comfort.
Air Source Heat Pump The primary heating systems used in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes is an air source heat pump. This versatile and energy efficient system will heat the homes during the winter months and cool it during...
AI summary The document describes the use of air source heat pumps (ASHP) in Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes, highlighting their dual functionality for heating and cooling, closed-system design with heat recovery ventilators, and reliance on refrigeration compressors and thermostats for temperature control.
Water and power conservation In additi on to the major energy-effi cient elements listed in this booklet, there are various other upgrades that the Demonstrati on homes feature. To help the homeowners save electricity is an energy control...
AI summary The text highlights energy and water conservation measures in demonstration homes, including an energy control switch to manage electricity use and low-flow fixtures to reduce water consumption by over 30%. It emphasizes the environmental and economic benefits of these technologies.
Come experience the future of residential housing in Nova Scotia! The Effi ciency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are being hailed as the most energy-effi cient residential homes in the province! Come see for yourself the construction tech...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's Demonstration Homes are highlighted as the most energy-efficient residential homes in Nova Scotia, showcasing advanced construction techniques and products that achieve the best energy ratings available.
Create a more Energy Efficient Nova Scotia
AI summary Initiative to enhance energy efficiency in Nova Scotia through regulatory proceedings, focusing on demand-side management and energy conservation measures.
Appliance Retirement Program Do you have an inefficient second fridge? Perhaps an old freezer, dehumidifier or room air conditioner? We'll pay you for your old, inefficient appliances.
AI summary Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program offers financial incentives to residents for removing inefficient appliances such as second fridges, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room air conditioners, aiming to reduce energy consumption and promote more efficient alternatives.
Building a New Home? We offer rebates for energy efficiency measures. Get access to valuable energy analysis tools and rebates on your new home when you build with energy saving measures.
AI summary The document promotes energy efficiency rebates and tools for new home construction. It highlights incentives for building with energy-saving measures, emphasizing access to energy analysis resources.
EnerGuide for Existing Houses Are you a homeowner looking to save money on your heating and power bill? If so, the EnerGuide for Existing Homes may be for you. You get access to valuable energy analysis tools and can earn rebates worth up...
AI summary EnerGuide for Existing Houses offers homeowners energy analysis tools and rebates up to $6500 for energy efficiency upgrades. Administered by ENSC, the program aims to reduce heating and power bills through targeted energy conservation measures.
This program has been extended to Dec. 31, 2011! Apply now to help reduce your electricity bill. Whether you want to get off electric heat altogether or just want to supplement it with another energy source, earn rebates and save money by...
AI summary A program extension until December 31, 2011, encourages switching from electric heating to wood, pellet, or natural gas heating to reduce electricity bills and earn rebates. Participants can supplement electric heat or transition entirely to alternative energy sources.
2.3 2011 DSM Programs In its first full year of operation, ENSC built awareness as the new place for Nova Scotians to go for energy efficiency solutions, largely through the promotion of its programs, advertising, media opportunities and o...
AI summary In 2011, ENSC expanded energy efficiency outreach through online platforms and targeted low-income residents, exceeding its energy savings target. Programs included free upgrades for renters and homeowners, with 12.4 GWh saved and 10,023 participants. Online engagement and direct-install services increased accessibility and participation.
DATE FILED: February 27, 2012 Page 11 of 45 1 The Small Business Energy Solutions program completed lighting retrofits for 1468 customers in 2011, compared to 801 in 2010. Delivery agents have continued to build capacity, and a number of n...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions program completed lighting retrofits for 1468 customers in 2011, compared to 801 in 2010. Delivery agents have continued to build capacity, and a number of non-lighting measures are being added for planned implementation in 2012.
Through the Efficient Products program, CFLs and LED exit-sign lamps were installed for 4,595 businesses, non-profit and institutional customers in 2011. Additional efforts included a successful LED lighting pilot for applications not suit...
AI summary In 2011, ENSC implemented various energy efficiency programs, including the Efficient Products program, Custom program, and Prescriptive Rebates program, targeting businesses, non-profits, and institutional customers. Outreach efforts were directed at specific sectors, and new initiatives such as the Embedded Energy Manager program were piloted to support large customers.
3.2 Annual Progress Reports Beginning in 2013, and in each intervening year between multi-year filings, ENSC will file an annual progress report in the first quarter of the calendar year, intended to be a paper filing and consisting of: a...
AI summary ENSC is required to file annual progress reports starting in 2013, in the first quarter of each calendar year, summarizing the context, activities, and milestones achieved in the prior year.
4.1 Summary ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan, presented in Appendix A, is a multi-year plan, which identifies proposed DSM programs, services, and strategies, and annual investment and energy savings targets, for 2013, 2014 and 2015. The plan bui...
AI summary ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan introduces a customer-focused approach to energy efficiency, replacing program-specific outreach with personalized solutions. It emphasizes cultural change through public education, community engagement, and long-term behavior modification, building on prior DSM strategies. The plan aims to simplify customer interactions and sustain energy savings through social marketing.
& lt;sup>a Lifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. & lt;sup>b TRC is a benefit/cost ratio comparing lifetime benefits to the sum o...
AI summary The text discusses lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC ratios in the context of energy efficiency programs, highlighting avoided costs and participation by low-income households.
Savings from Codes and Standards In addition to savings resulting from the 2013-2015 DSM Plan, ENSC is forecasting energy savings attributed to the adoption of new energy efficiency codes and standards as provided in Figure 4.6. ENSC's str...
AI summary ENSC is forecasting energy savings from the adoption of new energy efficiency codes and standards, in addition to savings from the 2013-2015 DSM Plan. ENSC's strategy to support and influence code and standard development is critical for long-term energy savings in Nova Scotia.
1 4.3 DSM Targets 2 3 ENSC affirms that the overall purpose of electricity DSM in Nova Scotia is to help meet 4 the province's long-term electricity needs through conservation and energy efficiency as 5 a lower-cost alternative to new supp...
AI summary ENSC emphasizes the importance of Demand Side Management (DSM) in meeting Nova Scotia's long-term electricity needs through conservation and energy efficiency. ENSC has successfully met the energy savings targets set out in the 2009 IRP Update, which outlines DSM targets for 2008-2017.
- DSM program achievements to date - the saturation of low-cost CFL measures - the importance of building a culture of energy efficiency for sustained energy savings - energy efficiency service capacity in Nova Scotia DSM program achieveme...
AI summary The DSM program in Nova Scotia has largely relied on low-cost CFL measures, but these are now saturated. ENSC emphasizes the need to build a culture of energy efficiency and shift focus to community-based approaches for sustained energy savings.
social marketing and awareness building, using research, insights and feedback from staff, customers, stakeholders and trade allies, best practices from other jurisdictions and home-grown innovation. An evolution to a one-window customer s...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is focusing on social marketing, awareness building, and customer service improvements to optimize energy savings. ENSC plans to adopt a one-window approach to provide personalized energy solutions and promote energy efficiency codes. The Corporation is also strengthening relationships with trade allies to expand the energy efficiency industry and deliver more cost-effective services.
1 ENSC's Response: As a point of clarification, the old fluorescent tubes from ENSC's Small Business Energy Solutions program are fully recycled, as opposed to being destructed in a standard bulb eater where its mercury-laden filter could...
AI summary ENSC clarifies that fluorescent tubes from its Small Business Energy Solutions program are fully recycled, not destructed, and details the recycling process and associated costs in 2011.
ENSC's Response: ENSC recognizes that lack of financial capital may be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. Removal of this barrier could increase participation in energy efficiency programs and therefore increase en...
AI summary ENSC acknowledges financial barriers hinder energy efficiency adoption and proposes on-bill financing with NSPI and other partners to expand DSM participation. Discussions include bank partnerships and leveraging rebates for broader program access, with cost-benefit analyses planned for 2012 implementation.
Background: A dual baseline approach calculates energy savings using a more complex method than is used by the majority of North American DSM administrators. Most jurisdictions use the effective useful life (EUL), or assumed average life o...
AI summary The text explains a dual baseline approach for calculating energy savings in demand-side management (DSM) programs, which considers both the effective useful life (EUL) of the new measure and the remaining useful life (RUL) of the replaced equipment. This method accounts for technological improvements and market changes, affecting how energy savings are calculated and claimed over time.
2.0 RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES The overarching objective for ENSC's residential sector electricity DSM initiatives is to help Nova Scotians achieve long-term energy savings by building energy efficiency and conservation consideratio...
AI summary ENSC's residential DSM initiatives aim to promote long-term energy savings through efficiency and conservation. Programs include product rebates, whole-home efficiency, appliance retirement, and home energy reports. Education and peer comparisons are used to drive behavioral change. Four categories of initiatives are outlined: Efficient Product Rebates, Existing Residential, New Residential, and Energy Saving Actions.
2.1 Efficient Product Rebates Financial incentives to offset the higher cost of efficient products, along with public awareness, education, and retail availability, are the foundation of Efficient Product Rebates. All homeowners and renter...
AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates program offers financial incentives for high-efficiency products, including ENERGY STAR® items, and provides free efficient products for low-income residents. The Appliance Retirement component includes cash incentives and recycling for old appliances.
2.2 Existing Residential The Existing Residential service is designed to promote cost-effective energy efficiency improvements to Nova Scotia's housing stock of single detached houses, duplexes, rental housing, mobile/mini homes and multi-...
AI summary The Existing Residential program promotes energy efficiency in Nova Scotia's housing stock through incentives for lighting, heating, and appliance upgrades. It includes renter eligibility, direct installation of low-cost measures, and enhanced customer support. Funding comes from the Province of Nova Scotia, with ENSC managing service organizations for implementation.
Low Income The Low Income Homeowners component builds on the existing program, providing free energy audits and turnkey implementation of energy efficiency measures at no cost to participants. Building envelope measures include upgrades su...
AI summary The Low Income Homeowners program offers free energy audits and no-cost efficiency upgrades for low-income households, including insulation, CFLs, and ENERGY STAR appliances. It expands to renters with direct installation services and education. Measures aim to reduce energy costs through envelope improvements, appliance replacements, and behavioral education.
1 Low-income seniors are a specific market segment that ENSC can target for participation 2 in its programs. 3 4 ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan includes an investment of $13.3 million in Low Income 5 DSM programs over three years to achieve 19....
AI summary The text discusses ENSC's focus on targeting low-income seniors for participation in its programs and the promotion of green heating systems, including solar thermal, ground source heat pumps, and biomass systems. It outlines the goal of increasing market penetration of renewable heating technologies and the strategies for implementation.
2.4 Energy Saving Actions The Energy Saving Actions initiative being implemented in 2012 is known as the Home Energy Report and involves a combination of mailed information and an Internet portal. It may be continued for use in 2013 to 201...
AI summary The Home Energy Report initiative, part of the Energy Saving Actions program, aims to help residential customers reduce energy use through behavioral changes and regular feedback on electricity consumption. The program, delivered in partnership with Nova Scotia Power, may be expanded and enhanced through 2015, including the use of smart meters and other platforms.
Customers will have the option of completing an online or mail-in questionnaire about their home, which will allow ENSC to provide more customized recommendations. 1 3.0 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES FOR BUSINESSES, NON-PROFIT AND 2 INSTITUTIONAL...
AI summary ENSC is introducing a new customer engagement method through online or mail-in questionnaires to provide customized recommendations. The term 'Business, Non-profit and Institutional' (BNI) is being used to more accurately describe the sector previously known as 'Commercial and Industrial (C&I)', including segments like healthcare and education.
3.1 Efficient Product Rebates The Efficient Product Rebates category is intended to secure cost-effective electrical energy savings for customers in the retrofit and new construction markets, through promotion and rebates on high-efficienc...
AI summary ENSC's Efficient Product Rebates aim to reduce customer costs for energy-efficient technologies through rebates and financing, targeting retrofit and new construction markets. The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program combines previous initiatives and offers prescriptive rebates for equipment with measurable energy savings, focusing on market-driven opportunities and specific industries.
1 Measures are categorized as: 2 3 market-driven measures, such as equipment replacement, new 4 construction, renovation and expansion, where the program can result in 5 higher efficiency choices than would otherwise have been purchased...
AI summary The text outlines the categorization of energy efficiency measures, including market-driven and discretionary retrofit measures, and discusses the role of technical and financial services in supporting energy efficiency initiatives. It also mentions the Custom program's focus on tailored offerings and future initiatives such as continuous energy improvement and biomass energy feasibility studies.
3.3 Direct Installation In the Direct Installation category, the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program is designed to acquire electrical energy savings through the direct installation of energy-efficient measures for small busines...
AI summary The Direct Installation category under the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program focuses on acquiring energy savings through the direct installation of energy-efficient measures, such as lighting retrofits, for small businesses and non-profit organizations. The program offers incentives covering up to 80% of project costs and provides marketing support to promote participation.
1 4.0 ENABLING STRATEGIES 1 customer understanding, complemented by a wide variety of communications activities. 2 Education and outreach strategies for 2013 through 2015 will build on existing programs, 3 research, feedback from Nova Scot...
AI summary The document outlines enabling strategies for customer education and outreach from 2013 to 2015, focusing on energy efficiency and demand-side management (DSM). It emphasizes educating customers, students, and the public on energy conservation, reducing peak demand, and the benefits of DSM programs. The strategy includes training delivery agents and incorporating customer feedback to improve programs.
4.3 Innovative Financing ENSC recognizes that a lack of upfront capital can be a barrier to customers adopting energy efficiency measures. ENSC's objective is to deliver innovative financing to remove this barrier and increase participatio...
AI summary ENSC aims to address upfront capital barriers for energy efficiency adoption through innovative financing, targeting DSM programs like the Existing Residential initiative. Financing options will support capital-intensive projects such as green heating systems, benefiting residential and commercial customers.
develop capacity to meet future needs 1 ENSC is evaluating several financing options, including potential opportunities to 30 already seen, and expects to see, continued growth in local energy 31 efficiency industries that supply products...
AI summary ENSC is exploring various financing options to expand capacity and support future energy efficiency needs. It anticipates growth in local energy efficiency industries and aims to improve customer access to knowledgeable service providers and energy-efficient technologies. ENSC plans to build a network of trade allies and enhance their capabilities in energy efficiency training and quality assurance.
ABOUT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specialized in the design, analysis and implementation of successful energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and policies. Our clients include leading...
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specializing in energy efficiency and renewable energy program design, analysis, and implementation. They serve utilities, government agencies, private firms, and non-profits in Canada and the U.S.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Philippe Dunsky has 20 years of experience in the fields of energy efficiency and renewable energy (EE/RE) programs, plans and policies. Throughout much of his career, he has provided analytical support and strategic couns...
AI summary Philippe Dunsky, an energy efficiency and renewable energy expert with 20 years of experience, has provided analytical support and strategic counsel to utilities, government agencies, private firms, and non-profits across North America. His work focuses on EE/RE programs, plans, and policies.
2. MARKET CREDIBILITY For ENSC to succeed in transforming markets toward greater energy efficiency, it will need to convince a wide array of market actors to invest in new business lines, procurement processes, and other ventures. For exam...
AI summary ENSC requires market actors to invest in training and certification programs for energy efficiency, including evaluators, contractors, and building professionals. Collaboration with educational institutions is essential, contingent on sustained demand for these services.
RECOMMENDATIONS
AI summary The document outlines recommendations from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, involving entities like NSPI, ENSC, and UARB. Key topics include DSM, energy efficiency programs, and cost recovery mechanisms. Acronyms such as DSM, ENSC, and DCRR are central to the discussion.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Cost Allocation Report
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) submitted a cost allocation report, detailing its programs and cost recovery mechanisms, likely in response to regulatory oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). Key programs include Demand Side Management (DSM) and Business Energy Rebates (BER), with references to regulatory tests like the Total Resource Cost Test (TRC).
4 Relative shares of program costs incurred on particpating rate classes before Municipal Class Existing New Efficient Home Energy Small Education & Development Other Enabling 5 Program Homes Construction Products Report Prescriptive Custo...
AI summary This table presents the relative shares of program costs incurred across various rate classes before the Municipal Class. The data highlights the distribution of costs among different categories such as residential, small general, and industrial rate classes for various programs including Home Energy Report and Education & Outreach.
2 COLUMN A B C D K L M R S T 4 Program costs incurred on participating rate classes New Efficient Home Energy Small Education & Development Other Enabling 5 Program Existing Homes Construction Products Report Prescriptive Custom Business O...
AI summary The text presents a table showing the distribution of program costs across different rate classes and sectors, highlighting the percentage of costs incurred by each category. It also includes data on the relative shares of municipal sales in total NSPI sales by sector, providing insights into the breakdown of sales and their proportions.
22 23 4 Relative shares of program costs incurred on particpating rate classes before Municipal Class Existing New Efficient Home Energy Education & Development Other Enabling 5 Program Homes Construction Products Report Prescriptive Custo...
AI summary The table presents the relative shares of program costs incurred across various rate classes in the context of energy efficiency programs. It details how different programs, such as Home Energy Report and Education & Outreach, are distributed among residential, industrial, and other rate classes.
Detailed Review of completed energy efficiency projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation October 17, 2011
AI summary This document, dated October 17, 2011, outlines a detailed review of completed energy efficiency projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury, conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). The review involves Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), focusing on regulatory compliance and project outcomes.
3. PROJECTS CONSIDERED While NPPH is always in the process of continuous improvement with respect to energy and other raw materials consumption, only a limited number of projects were considered as part of the INITIAL REPORT. These were es...
AI summary The text discusses the consideration of energy efficiency projects by NPPH, noting that only a limited number were included in the INITIAL REPORT. Projects not showing savings were excluded, and the scope of projects in the M&V REPORT is summarized.
Table 3– Projects found to significantly affect energy consumption, INITIAL REPORT Feb 2 # Project Title Year started estimate on preling projects minary Comments GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 74.00 8.5 Start-up June 30, 2010. Becau...
AI summary Table 3 lists energy consumption projects that significantly impact energy use, including upgrades and optimizations at various facilities. The table includes project titles, start dates, energy estimates, and comments on their impact.
y performance numbers from NPPH, but not independently audited at the time of the report. In the SEP approach to energy performance evaluation, two different components are required for the analysis: - The first component is top-down energ...
AI summary The document outlines the two components of the Superior Energy Performance (SEP) approach for evaluating energy performance at NPPH: top-down analysis using whole-facility data and bottom-up sanity checks. Due to limited sub-facility metering, the top-down analysis applies to the entire mill, while bottom-up evaluation focuses on three TMP projects and one PM2 plant project. The standard conditions method from the SEP protocol is used for baseline comparisons.
Table 5 – Contents of regression analysis modelling files Tab Content Purpose Appendix 3a) NPPH Mill Regressions (Rev 4) – All modeling work except PM2 blower project Tab-1 PI system vs NSPI bills Check accuracy & validity of energy data i...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the contents of regression analysis modelling files, detailing various tabs and their purposes, including energy data validation, regression iterations, and analysis of factors like ambient temperature on refining energy.
4.3Data analyzed As discussed, EPS obtained daily averages for key operating and energy consumption variables for at least one full year prior to the start of each energy efficiency project studied and one year following the implementation...
AI summary EPS analyzed energy efficiency projects at NPPH using data from the PI historian and NSPI invoices, finding general alignment despite minor discrepancies. Key projects included Line 1 Refiner Replacement and PM2 Vacuum Blower initiatives, with data collection challenges noted for some projects.
4.4Period of Analysis, Energy & Conditions Since TMP refining energy (electricity) consumption represents a full two-thirds of the NPPH mill's electric consumption a first analysis was done on TMP refining energy. Because of its relative i...
AI summary The analysis focuses on TMP refining energy consumption at NPPH, which accounts for two-thirds of the mill's electricity use. Detailed records from power transmitters enabled statistical modeling of energy use relative to production, leading to a CUSUM chart for monitoring efficiency trends pre- and post-2009 energy projects.
4.5Baseline Period Based on the above analysis, we have chosen a baseline period of June 1 2007 to June 30 2008, where we have observed fairly stable operating conditions prior to energy efficiency improvements. This represents the period...
AI summary The baseline period selected is June 1, 2007, to June 30, 2008, due to stable operating conditions before energy efficiency improvements. This period reflects pre-improvement conditions.
Table 4 (repeated) – Reporting periods and standard conditions for production. Year Period Start Period End Paper actual avg. TMP actual avg. Tonnes/ yr & day ADMT/ yr & day Yr 1 Jun 1, 2007 Jun 30, 2008 515,842 1,413.3 435,250 1,193.5 Yr...
AI summary The text discusses the standard conditions for production periods and the use of a fixed Paper/TMP ratio to quantify avoided energy use. It outlines the reporting periods, production averages, and the rationale for maintaining a fixed ratio to ensure accurate energy use quantification.
Table 5 – Output from Importance of Factors Analysis Coefficient Factor Product Percent Intercept -20.064 1499 -30076 -11% Avg. refining load (MW) 1.265 180938 228846 84% Total paper production (tonnes/d) 0.013 2077764 27123 10% TMP plant...
AI summary The analysis in Table 5 indicates that TMP plant outlet freeness is not a significant predictor of mill energy consumption due to low importance percentages. Refining load, however, is identified as the most significant predictor of mill electricity consumption.
Table 7 – Multi-variable Regression Statistical Fit Indicators and Importance Factors for NPPH's Total Electrical Consumption Period 2 R Standard Importance factor / P-Value Deviation Paper Production TMP production Temperature (MW) (tonne...
AI summary Table 7 presents multi-variable regression statistical fit indicators and importance factors for NPPH's total electrical consumption across different periods. The data shows high R-squared values and significant importance factors for variables such as paper production, TMP production, and temperature, indicating their strong influence on energy consumption.
Table 8 – Top-down savings estimate, standard conditions: 1,400 t/d of paper, 10°C, 365 days/yr # Projects that came on-line during period (with start date) Mill annual GWh Avg. MW Yr 1 Baseline 1,697.7 193.9 Optimize Line 3 (Summer 2008)...
AI summary Table 8 presents a top-down savings estimate for energy consumption in a paper mill, comparing baseline energy use in Year 1 to consumption in Year 4 after several energy efficiency projects were implemented. The table shows a reduction in annual energy use from 1,697.7 GWh to 1,543.5 GWh, resulting in an estimated savings of 154.2 GWh annually.
The importance factor, expressed as a percentage (either positive or negative), is the relative weight that a factor has in the regression equation. Regardless of the sign, an importance factor which is less than 1% is indicative that a fa...
AI summary The text discusses statistical significance in regression equations, noting that factors with importance factors below 1% or P-values above 0.05 are not statistically significant. It highlights that ambient temperature and the Year 4 intercept are not significant, but the intercept is retained for consistency. It also notes increased refining energy variability in Year 4 due to differences in specific energy consumption across refining lines.
herefore more efficient to run TMP lines as hard as possible and shut them down when they are not required than to reduce production over a longer period to meet a specified paper machine requirement. Coupled with the observation that the...
AI summary The mill has increased flexibility in managing production levels due to the Line 1 modernization project, allowing it to adjust production in response to paper machine requirements and take advantage of load shedding opportunities during high power prices.
days/yr fixed Paper/TMP ratio of 1.131 # Project Title Year started Bottom-up savings estimate at fixed Paper/TMP ratio GWh/yr MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 53.4 6.1 2 Optimize Line 3 Production Mid 2009 59.6 6.8 3 Optimize Rejects Scre...
AI summary The document presents a table with three projects and their energy savings estimates based on a fixed Paper/TMP ratio of 1.131. It explains that pulp production estimates are less accurate due to challenges in calibrating TMP production from refiner feed screw speed conversions, which are affected by variations in chip bulk density.
7. AGGREGATED PROJECT RESULTS Finally, as per the suggested procedure within the SEP M&V protocol, we have tallied all the bottom-up energy saving estimates in order to compare them to the top-down estimate derived from the mill aggregated...
AI summary The text discusses the aggregation of project results using the SEP M&V protocol, comparing bottom-up energy saving estimates with top-down estimates from mill aggregated consumption data. It notes that project 4 does not contribute to validated savings as it is not yet commissioned.
# Project Title started based on st Bottom Up estimate based on statistical energy analysis ed INITIAL F estimate GWh MW GWh MW 1 Upgrade Line 1 Refiner 2010 53.4 6.1 63.9 7.3 2 Optimize Line 3 Production Mid 2009 50.6 C 0 9.8 1.1 3 Optimi...
AI summary The table outlines various energy projects with their start dates, energy savings in GWh and MW, and initial estimates. It includes projects like upgrading Line 1 Refiner and optimizing production, with a note that some projects were not completed.
8. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The top-down electricity savings estimate for the whole mill described in Section-5 of this Report is consistent with the M&V requirements defined in the SEP M&V Protocol and meets all the IPMVP criteria (a...
AI summary The top-down electricity savings estimate for NPPH aligns with SEP M&V and IPMVP criteria, validating its accuracy. It closely matches the initial report but may be higher due to limited data for bottom-up analysis. The estimate is deemed a reasonable reflection of actual energy savings achieved.
GREEN HEATING SYSTEMS INITIATIVE OVERVIEW FOR ENSC'S 2013-2015 DSM PLAN Prepared by PHILIPPE DUNSKY, PRESIDENT FRANÇOIS BOULANGER, SENIOR CONSULTANT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Submitted to: EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION January 31 th ,...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems Initiative is part of ENSC's 2013-2015 Demand Side Management (DSM) plan, aiming to promote energy efficiency in heating systems. Prepared by Dunskey Energy Consulting, the document outlines program goals and is submitted to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
ABOUT DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specialized in the design, analysis and implementation of successful energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and policies. Our clients include leading...
AI summary Dunsky Energy Consulting is a Montreal-based firm specializing in designing, analyzing, and implementing energy efficiency and renewable energy programs and policies for clients including utilities, government agencies, private firms, and non-profits in Canada and the U.S.
OBJECTIVES Green Heating Systems, which we have defined to include systems that deliver all or most of their heat directly from renewable resources, have the potential to deliver significant benefits to Nova Scotia, including electricity s...
AI summary The initiative aims to promote Green Heating Systems, which use renewable resources for heating, to achieve electricity savings and reduce emissions. Current ENSC programs like EnerGuide for Houses and Performance Plus focus on comprehensive home improvements but miss opportunities for homeowners needing only heating system upgrades. The new initiative will use incentives, training, and marketing to expand adoption, targeting HVAC installers and builders.
1- Electric Space Heating Households - by channel and heat distribution systems As can be seen, the vast majority of Nova Scotia's electrically heated homes are not being reached by the existing comprehensive energy efficiency programs, an...
AI summary The analysis highlights that most electrically heated homes in Nova Scotia are not covered by current energy efficiency programs, with many using zoned baseboard heating systems. Table 2 provides a qualitative assessment of market potential for technologies based on heat distribution systems.
2 - Green Heating Systems Market Potential Target Technologies Zoned Heating (baseboard) Central Heating (furnaces, boilers) Solar Thermal Small Small Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHP) marginal Small Ductless Air Source Heat Pumps (DHP) LARG...
AI summary The analysis evaluates the market potential of green heating technologies in Nova Scotia. While individual technologies like solar thermal and ground-source heat pumps show limited potential, combined adoption of ductless air source heat pumps and pellets/cordwood systems could yield significant electricity and GHG savings. Zoned heating systems (e.g., DHPs) demonstrate larger potential compared to central heating applications.
3 - Green Heating Systems Requirements Technologies Existing Requirements for Eligibility Requirements to be Developed Solar Thermal None TBD Ground Source Heat Pumps (GHP) Conforms to CAN/CSA-448. Installation certified by CGC. Ductless A...
AI summary The document outlines current and proposed eligibility requirements for green heating technologies, including ground source heat pumps, ductless and air source heat pumps, and pellet stoves and furnaces. Existing standards are referenced, and new high-performance standards are under development for some technologies.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS While most of the targeted Green Heating Systems are readily available in Nova Scotia, this is not the case of whole-house, fully-automated pellet boilers and furnaces. In keeping with the recommendations of our previo...
AI summary The initiative focuses on promoting Green Heating Systems, including a pilot project for whole-house pellet boilers and third-party pellet supply distribution. It also emphasizes energy awareness through maintenance, weatherization, and whole-house approaches, with incentives aligned to ENSC's existing programs.
KEY PERFORMANCE ASSUMPTIONS Our assessment of the likely costs, benefits and electricity savings associated with this program is built upon hundreds of important inputs that address such issues as incremental costs, savings, baseline techn...
AI summary The program's key performance assumptions focus on heat pump efficiency, using specific HSPF values for ducted and ductless systems in Nova Scotia, referencing Energy Trust of Oregon standards and considering load building penalties.
KEY COMPONENTS
AI summary The document outlines key components and acronyms related to a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including energy efficiency programs, utility regulations, and cost recovery mechanisms. It lists organizations, programs, and technical terms involved in energy management and utility oversight.
CHANNELS The Green Heating Systems initiative will focus primarily on existing HVAC channels, as well as on direct marketing to homes heated with electric baseboard, to promote Green Heating Systems. In order to add additional value, the i...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative targets existing HVAC channels and homes using electric baseboard heating, promoting green heating solutions. It integrates with ENSC's EnerGuide for Houses and Performance Plus programs, offering enhanced incentives for participation.
FORECAST RESULTS The following table presents the expected electricity-related costs, savings and benefits for the first three years of the Green Heating Systems initiative, as included in ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan. The reported numbers in...
AI summary The document outlines forecasted electricity costs, savings, and benefits for the first three years of the Green Heating Systems initiative under ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan. It includes participants from whole-house, simple rebate, and new HVAC-only channels, factoring in net-to-gross adjustments, interactive effects, and cost allocations to Enabling Strategies and non-DSM budgets.
SAVINGS 2013 2014 2015 Gross Savings (Incr. Ann.) 1st Yr Electricity Svgs (MWh) 20,330 25,391 30,816 Levelized-Lifetime (MWh) 230,543 290,735 358,749 Net Savings (Incr. Ann) 1st Yr Electricity Svgs (MWh) 10,150 12,768 15,664 Levelized-Life...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative demonstrates cost-effectiveness with savings increasing from 2013 to 2015. Gross and net electricity savings rose annually, while unit costs remained stable. The program passed both the Total Resource Cost and Program Administrator Cost tests, showing that for every dollar invested, ENSC achieved approximately $2.87 in savings.
2011 Socket Study
AI summary The 2011 Socket Study examines energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia, focusing on Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, utility regulations, and cost recovery mechanisms. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). The study addresses program evaluation, cost allocation, and compliance with energy efficiency standards.
Executive Summary The results of the 2011 Socket Study indicate that approximately one-half of all bulbs in Nova Scotia are energy efficient CFL or LED. Overall, residents of Nova Scotia report having an average of 26 permanent light fixtu...
AI summary The 2011 Socket Study found that 50% of Nova Scotia bulbs are energy efficient (CFL/LED), with residents averaging 19 efficient bulbs. Usage varies by demographics, heating sources, and income. Residents plan to replace bulbs, but LED adoption is uncertain. Verification showed discrepancies between survey and in-home data, with efficient bulbs more common in high-use fixtures.
Detailed Analysis
AI summary The document heading indicates a regulatory proceeding analysis in Nova Scotia, focusing on energy programs and regulatory frameworks. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), with acronyms related to demand-side management, cost recovery, and energy efficiency programs.
Energy Efficiency Approximately one-half of all bulbs in Nova Scotia are energy efficient CFL or LED. LED bulbs are the least common of all bulb types. Overall, residents of Nova Scotia report having an average of 26 permanent light fixtur...
AI summary In Nova Scotia, about half of all bulbs are energy efficient CFL or LED, with LED bulbs being the least common. Residents have an average of 26 permanent light fixture bulbs, 6 plug-in lamp bulbs, and 4 outdoor light bulbs. Regular bulbs make up about half of all bulbs, while CFL bulbs are more common than LED bulbs in both permanent and plug-in fixtures.
Energy Efficient Number of bulbs found in Overall Regular Bulbs CFL Bulbs LED Bulbs Permanent Light Fixture Bulbs 26 13 12 1 Plug-in Lamp Bulbs 6 3 3 0 Outdoor Light Bulbs 4 2 1 1 \ NOTE: Figures rounded to nearest whole number
AI summary The table presents data on the number of bulbs found in different types of light fixtures, categorized by bulb type. It includes permanent light fixtures, plug-in lamps, and outdoor lights, with counts for regular, CFL, and LED bulbs.
Energy Efficient Outdoor Light Bulbs Approximately one-half of outdoor light bulbs are energy efficient CFLs or LEDs. Such energy efficient outdoor light bulbs are more common on the properties of homeowners, women, and residents who heat...
AI summary Approximately half of outdoor light bulbs are energy efficient (CFLs or LEDs), with LEDs being more common outdoors than in other fixtures. The text notes demographic trends, such as higher adoption among homeowners and those using alternative heating sources.
Intentions to Implement Energy Efficient Light Bulbs Up to one-half of residents intend to replace non-efficient bulbs in the next year with energy efficient light bulbs. In order to assess their intentions to improve the energy efficiency...
AI summary Survey data indicates 39% of residents plan to replace non-efficient bulbs with energy-efficient ones, with 50% intending CFL replacements and 26% LED. 34% are unsure, 27% will not replace bulbs. Uncertainty is higher for LEDs (44% unsure) compared to CFLs.
Household Will Replace Light Bulb Types With… (% Saying Yes, applies) In terms of replacing one light fixture with one that is more energy efficient, the only population difference that emerged was for residents who heat their home with oi...
AI summary The analysis reveals that residents heating with oil are less likely to replace light bulbs with energy-efficient options compared to those using electricity. Residence owners and higher-income households show greater intent to replace bulbs with CFLs, while apartment dwellers are less likely than those in single/detached homes.
In-Home Verification Visits As mentioned in the Introduction, a total of 50 in-home verification visits were made among survey respondents, to count the actual number of bulbs within surveyed households. A comparison of survey versus verif...
AI summary This section compares survey responses with verification visits for 50 households, revealing that respondents underestimated the number of regular light bulbs in permanent fixtures but accurately reported CFL and LED bulb counts.
Panel vs. Site Visit Analysis CFL Regular LED Panel Survey Site Visit Diff erence Panel Survey Site Visit Diff erence Panel Survey Site Visit Diff erence Permanent 14.3 14.8 ↑0.5 13.2 24.1 ↑10.9 1.5 .3 ↓1.2 Plug-in 3.7 3.8 ↑0.1 2.6 4.8 ↑2....
AI summary The document presents a comparison between panel survey and site visit data for CFLs, Regular, and LED lighting options, highlighting differences in measurements such as permanent, plug-in, and outdoor usage. The analysis focuses on variations in values across different lighting types.
Estimate of number of light bulbs Permanent CFL Plug-In CFL Outdoor CFL Underestimated by 11+ 7% 2% n/a Underestimated by 3-10 27% 17% 9% Correctly estimated within 2 43% 67% 82% Overestimated by 3-10 19% 9% 8% Overestimated by 11+ 4% 5% n...
AI summary The table provides an estimate of the number of light bulbs across different categories (Permanent CFL, Plug-In CFL, and Outdoor CFL), showing how accurately they were estimated. The estimates are categorized into ranges of underestimation, correct estimation, and overestimation.
Estimate of number of light bulbs Permanent LED Plug-In LED Outdoor LED Underestimated by 11+ n/a n/a n/a Underestimated by 3-10 6% 7% 2% Correctly estimated within 2 77% 91% 91% Overestimated by 3-10 14% 2% 6% Overestimated by 11+ 2% n/a...
AI summary The table estimates the accuracy of the number of light bulbs in different categories (Permanent LED, Plug-In LED, Outdoor LED). It shows that the majority of estimates were correctly within a 2% range, while some were underestimated or overestimated by varying degrees.
Reasons to Change
AI summary The document outlines acronyms and entities involved in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including organizations, programs, and technical terms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and cost recovery mechanisms. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, Nova Scotia Power Inc., and various energy programs.
Rebates
AI summary The 'Rebates' section of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document outlines discussions related to rebate programs and their administration. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), with topics focusing on program cost recovery, utility rebates, and energy efficiency initiatives. No specific claims or cross-references are detailed in the provided text.
Full Conversion - Rebates for new central heating system and installation - Natural gas = 30% rebate (with cap) - Wood / Pellet = 40-60% rebate (with cap) - Up to $6,500 in additional rebates to remove electric and install new distribution...
AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient upgrades, including 30-60% rebates for new central heating systems (natural gas, wood/pellet), up to $6,500 for distribution system upgrades, and up to $750 for domestic water heating systems. Caps apply to all rebates.
Results to Date
AI summary The 'Results to Date' section is under development, with a comprehensive list of acronyms and entities involved in Nova Scotia's regulatory proceedings. Key organizations, programs, and technical terms are defined, but substantive analysis or outcomes are not detailed in the provided text.
• Key Learnings: - Awareness of inefficiencies and waste - Sustainability - Energy efficiency, food sources, grounds, operations, procurement, transportation, water and waste - Teamwork, leadership - Stewardship, active citizenship
AI summary The key learnings emphasize awareness of inefficiencies, sustainability across energy, operations, and procurement, and the importance of teamwork, leadership, stewardship, and active citizenship in achieving operational and environmental goals.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes Laura Sinclair ENSC Program Manager DSM Stakeholder Consultation Session November 3, 2011
AI summary A DSM stakeholder consultation session led by Laura Sinclair, ENSC Program Manager, on November 3, 2011, focused on Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes. The session involved discussions around energy efficiency programs, regulatory processes, and stakeholder input.
Allan Crandlemire CEO, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are two great projects that will help educate Nova Scotians on how to use energy better. The remarkable design and construction of the...
AI summary Allan Crandlemire, CEO of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlights the success of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes in promoting energy efficiency. He emphasizes the affordability and long-term savings of energy-efficient homes, supported by programs like Performance Plus, and advocates for their widespread adoption in Nova Scotia.
a message from Paul Pettipas CEO, Nova Scotia Home Builders' Association As the cost of energy rises, homeowners need to explore different ways to conserve energy to lower their monthly costs. Programs like the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demon...
AI summary Paul Pettipas, CEO of the Nova Scotia Home Builders' Association, promotes the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes as a model for energy-efficient residential construction. These homes reduce carbon footprints and long-term energy costs, despite higher initial building costs, offering substantial energy savings over time.
news, as well as on allNovaScoti a.com. As part of the program, the builders were required the homes to be completed by October 1st so they can be open to the public for an eight-week viewing period. During these eight weeks, industry prof...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes program showcases energy-efficient residential construction, aiming to educate Nova Scotians on cost-effective and sustainable home building. Homes were completed by October 1st for an eight-week public viewing period, highlighting reduced carbon footprints and energy savings.
R-2000: Giving back to Homeowners Energy efficient homes constantly reduce their owner's carbon footprint and save them money from the day they are complete. Not only do energy efficient homes save money in energy costs through their lifes...
AI summary Energy-efficient homes reduce carbon footprints and save owners money over time. Some homes qualify for Performance Plus rebates if they meet EnerGuide standards, offering additional financial incentives for compliance.
PerformancePlus Program In Nova Scotia, based on the building code, a home following the performance path must reach an EnerGuide rating of 80. Made available to anyone building a new home in the province, PerformancePlus is Nova Scotia's...
AI summary The PerformancePlus Program in Nova Scotia is a home energy efficiency initiative requiring new homes to meet an EnerGuide rating of 80. It offers rebates based on energy performance, encouraging energy-efficient construction.
What is the EnerGuide Rating System? EnerGuide is an energy scale used to measure the efficiency of new homes and all R-2000 homes must have a minimum rating of 80. New homeowners qualify for monetary rebates with an EnerGuide rating above...
AI summary The EnerGuide Rating System measures the energy efficiency of new homes, with R-2000 homes requiring a minimum rating of 80. Homeowners with ratings above 83 are eligible for monetary rebates.
The Performance Plus rebates pertaining to an EnerGuide rating are as follows: EnerGuide Rating Rebate 83 and 84 $3000 85 to 87 $5000 88 and above $7000 Other mechanical systems facilitate additional rebates. In fact, monetary incentives a...
AI summary The Performance Plus program offers rebates based on EnerGuide ratings, with higher ratings qualifying for larger rebates. Additional rebates are available for energy-efficient mechanical systems such as heat pumps and programmable thermostats, which help reduce energy bills over time.
Some of the mechanical systems that qualify for an additional rebate include: Mechanical System Rebate Heat pump $900-1200 Drain water heat recovery $130 Solar domestic hot water $1250 Programmable thermostats $15 Efficient Lighting $100 \...
AI summary The text lists mechanical systems that qualify for additional rebates under a program, including heat pumps, drain water heat recovery, solar domestic hot water, programmable thermostats, and efficient lighting, with corresponding rebate amounts.
EnerGuide 80 vs. EnerGuide 92+ The minimum standard for an R-2000 home is an EnerGuide rating of 80. Many homeowners work to achieve this minimum standard without considering the added benefit in exceeding it with additional energy efficie...
AI summary The document discusses the benefits of building homes with EnerGuide ratings above 80, highlighting long-term savings and environmental benefits. It emphasizes that while initial costs are higher, energy-efficient homes result in significant monthly energy savings. The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes serve as examples of energy-efficient construction.
Demonstration Home Profile: EnerGuide Rating: 94
AI summary The demonstration home profile includes an EnerGuide Rating of 94, indicating high energy efficiency in residential construction under Nova Scotia's regulatory proceedings.
Additional Features: - Triple glazed windows (facing south) - A drain water heat recovery (DWHR) system - Comprehensive automated monitoring system - Natural gas hookup for appliances and fireplace - Cork flooring and SmartStrand carpet -...
AI summary The text lists building features emphasizing energy efficiency, including triple glazed windows, drain water heat recovery systems, automated monitoring, natural gas hookups, and CFL/LED lighting. These features aim to enhance energy performance and sustainability in construction.
Demonstration Home Profile: EnerGuide Rating: 96
AI summary The Demonstration Home Profile includes an EnerGuide Rating of 96, indicating high energy efficiency. This rating is part of the EnerGuide for Houses (EGH) program, which evaluates residential energy performance.
About the home... Located in Lower Sackville, this Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Home is a two-level, single family dwelling located on Hanwell Drive in the newly developed Sunset Ridge subdivision. This elegant home is 2,304 square...
AI summary A two-level, single-family Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Home in Lower Sackville features solar thermal panels for water heating, photovoltaic panels for electricity generation, and an 8" engineered slab with foam insulation. Designed by Denim Homes Inc., the home emphasizes energy efficiency and sustainable building practices.
Insulation: - Foundation: R25 type 3 expanded foam under slab - Exterior Walls: R42 wet sprayed cellulose insulation with 1" foil faced foam over 10" walls with staggered 2"x4" vertical studs - Attic: R60 cellulose (recycled paper) insulat...
AI summary The document outlines specific insulation requirements for foundation, exterior walls, and attics, detailing materials (e.g., expanded foam, cellulose) and R-values (R25, R42, R60). These specifications likely relate to energy efficiency standards or building code compliance in Nova Scotia.
Additional Features: - Triple glazed windows - A drain water heat recovery (DWHR) system - Recycled quartz countertops - Comprehensive automated monitoring system - Integrated/mobile lighting and electrical control - CFL lighting - Acid-st...
AI summary The document lists additional features in a building, including energy-efficient measures like triple glazed windows, drain water heat recovery systems, and CFL lighting, along with sustainable materials and automated monitoring systems, likely part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency or building standards.
Wall Design Both Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are built with a unique wall design that creates a complete thermal break between the interior and exterior of the home. The wall structure is built with 2"x10" top and bottom pla...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes use a unique wall design with thermal breaks, staggered 2x4 studs, and enhanced insulation to improve energy efficiency. The design prevents heat conduction, includes boardstock insulation to avoid moisture condensation, and features large window ledges for aesthetic and functional benefits.
Windows The windows installed in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes contribute to the overall R-value of the home, in turn adding to the homes' energy efficiency. Most are triple glazed/paned, low-E argon windows. These windows...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes use triple-glazed low-E argon windows on the north side and double-glazed windows on other sides to enhance energy efficiency. Triple-glazed windows minimize heat loss, while double-glazed windows on sun-facing sides capture solar heat. Aerosol spray foam seals gaps, ensuring an airtight envelope.
Wall Insulation The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are insulated with a fibrous material known as cellulose, made completely out of recycled materials. Cellulose is mostly comprised of recycled newsprint and fire retardant mate...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's Demonstration Homes use cellulose insulation made from recycled newsprint and fire retardant materials, applied in walls and attics. This highlights sustainable insulation practices in residential construction.
Drain Water Heat Recovery In the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes even the drain water contributes to their energy efficiency. The heat from all drain water is used to further heat the domestic water supply in the home. This simp...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes utilize a drain water heat recovery system that recovers heat from drain water to preheat domestic water, reducing energy costs. The system uses a copper pipe wrapped around the domestic water supply line to transfer heat from drain water to the supply line, eliminating additional heating energy requirements.
Air Source Heat Pump The primary heating systems used in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes is an air source heat pump. This versatile and energy efficient system will heat the homes during the winter months and cool it during...
AI summary The document describes the use of air source heat pumps in Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes, highlighting their dual functionality for heating and cooling, closed-system design with heat recovery ventilators, and components like refrigeration compressors and heat exchangers. The system operates efficiently across seasons, controlled by programmable thermostats.
Water and power conservation In additi on to the major energy-effi cient elements listed in this booklet, there are various other upgrades that the Demonstrati on homes feature. To help the homeowners save electricity is an energy control...
AI summary The text highlights energy and water conservation measures in demonstration homes, including an energy control switch to reduce electricity use and low-flow fixtures to cut water consumption by over 30%. These upgrades benefit homeowners and the environment by improving efficiency in household energy and water usage.
Come experience the future of residential housing in Nova Scotia! The Effi ciency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are being hailed as the most energy-effi cient residential homes in the province! Come see for yourself the construction tech...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are promoted as the most energy-efficient residential homes in Nova Scotia, showcasing advanced construction techniques and products. These homes aim to set a new standard for energy ratings in the province.
Create a more Energy Efficient Nova Scotia
AI summary The initiative 'Create a more Energy Efficient Nova Scotia' focuses on enhancing energy efficiency through programs and regulatory frameworks, involving entities like Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), with oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB).
Appliance Retirement Program Do you have an inefficient second fridge? Perhaps an old freezer, dehumidifier or room air conditioner? We'll pay you for your old, inefficient appliances.
AI summary The Appliance Retirement Program offers financial incentives to residents for retiring inefficient appliances such as second fridges, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room air conditioners, aiming to promote energy efficiency and reduce waste.
Building a New Home? We offer rebates for energy efficiency measures. Get access to valuable energy analysis tools and rebates on your new home when you build with energy saving measures.
AI summary The document promotes energy efficiency rebates and tools for new home construction. It highlights incentives for incorporating energy-saving measures during home building, emphasizing access to energy analysis resources.
EnerGuide for Existing Houses Are you a homeowner looking to save money on your heating and power bill? If so, the EnerGuide for Existing Homes may be for you. You get access to valuable energy analysis tools and can earn rebates worth up...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Homes program offers homeowners energy analysis tools and rebates up to $6500 for energy efficiency upgrades, aiming to reduce heating and power costs.
This program has been extended to Dec. 31, 2011! Apply now to help reduce your electricity bill. Whether you want to get off electric heat altogether or just want to supplement it with another energy source, earn rebates and save money by...
AI summary The program, extended until December 31, 2011, offers rebates to reduce electricity bills by switching to wood, pellet, or natural gas heating.
Efficiency Nova Scotia is committed to providing energy saving to Nova Scotians. Contact us to find out how we can help you save money on your power bill. It's easy. So why not do it now? Like us on Facebook w: efficiencyns.ca e: info@effi...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia promotes energy-saving initiatives for Nova Scotians, offering assistance in reducing power bills. The text includes contact information, social media links, and a focus on customer engagement through outreach.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
5 Table 15: Recommendations for the Retail Markdown Program......................................................... 27 Table 16: Recommendations for the Low Income Renter Program .................................................... 29 Tab...
AI summary The document lists tables with recommendations for various energy efficiency and demand-side management programs, including low-income initiatives, residential retrofits, and business rebates. It references an evaluation of 2011 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and an executive summary from ECONOL:R.
x x Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) x x program Ref.: 5725 1 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary It is the opinion of Econoler that the portfolio of programs evaluate...
AI summary Econoler evaluated ENSC's 2011 DSM programs, noting efficient management and significant energy/demand savings (141.751 GWh and 28.864 MW) compared to 2010. Program design improvements and expanded market coverage drove success, though marketing/communication required enhancement. ENSC transitioned from NSPI as administrator in 2010.
each program offered by ENSC in 2011. Table 2: 2011 Savings Targets, Tracked Savings and Evaluated Results for Each Program (Net Energy and Demand Savings at the Generator)
AI summary The text references Table 2, which evaluates energy and demand savings from ENSC's 2011 programs, focusing on net generator-level metrics. The document discusses program performance tracking and evaluation within a regulatory proceeding context.
2011 Energy Savings (GWh) 2011 Demand Savings (MW) DSM PROGRAM Tracked Evaluated Tracked Evaluated Targets Targets Savings Savings Savings Savings RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS Efficient Products Programs ARet program 7.27 4.189 7.175 1.16 0.668 1....
AI summary The table presents 2011 energy and demand savings data for various DSM programs, including residential and C&I initiatives, showing tracked and evaluated savings against targets, with some programs exceeding their goals while others fell short.
program b Including the Fuel Substitution pilot c Including the Low Income Renter program d Including the BER and SLC programs Appliance Retirement Program The net savings achieved by the ARet program greatly exceeded those tracked by ENSC...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARet) and Appliance Replacement (ARep) programs achieved significantly higher net savings than Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) tracked, due to revised unitary savings values based on metering data. Econoler's evaluation methods for dehumidifiers and air conditioners also contributed. The Retail Markdown Program is mentioned in the context of DSM program evaluations.
ated for 2011. Moreover, while some adjustments were applied to the unitary savings estimates used in the tracking sheet, they were in most cases revised upward. Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program The MURR program net evaluated savings...
AI summary Evaluations of 2011 DSM programs show discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings. The Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program exceeded ENSC-tracked savings by 6%, attributed to revised unitary savings values and interactive effects. Conversely, the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program fell short by 12%, despite upward revisions to evaluation metrics.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program The evaluated net energy savings are lower than those tracked by ENSC by approximately 26 percent. This difference is mainly due to...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program's evaluated net energy savings are 26% lower than ENSC's tracking due to adjusted EnerGuide point values and revised unitary savings. The Fuel Substitution Pilot showed higher net savings than ENSC's tracking. Econoler adjusted savings calculations for pilot projects and prescriptive measures based on updated studies.
Substitution pilot revealed net savings higher than those tracked by ENSC. The difference between the NTGR used for the evaluation and in the tracking sheet explains this result. Low Income Program The net evaluated savings of the Low Inco...
AI summary The document compares evaluated savings from energy efficiency programs (Substitution pilot, Low Income, Performance Plus) with ENSC's tracked savings. Discrepancies arise from adjustments in baseline values, unitary savings calculations, and interactive effects of measures like lighting and thermal storage systems.
oler adjusted significantly the unitary peak demand savings related to the installation of electric thermal storage systems (reduction of tracked demand savings by approximately 75% for this system). Ref.: 5725 6 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Pro...
AI summary The document evaluates adjustments to demand savings from electric thermal storage systems, reducing tracked demand savings by 75%. It also assesses the Business Energy Rebates (BER) and Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) programs, noting the BER program's net savings were 1.5% lower than tracked by ENSC, while the SLC program's net savings were 3% higher due to increased operational hours.
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Portfolio Savings Portfolio Savings Portfolio Savings Portfolio Savings DSM PROGRAM 2008 2009 2010 2011 Energy Demand Energy Demand Energy Demand Energy Demand RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM ARe...
AI summary The table presents portfolio savings percentages for various Demand Side Management (DSM) programs across 2008-2011, including residential and commercial-industrial initiatives like RMP, EP-DI, and BER programs, showing energy and demand savings trends over time.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary In 2011, programs were launched as pilots while several pilot projects were integrated into existing or new programs. For example, the Fuel Substitution pilot as well as...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) launched and integrated multiple pilot programs in 2011, including Fuel Substitution, MURR, and LIR, targeting diverse markets. These programs provided valuable experience, though some were reconfigured or discontinued (e.g., Appliance Replacement). ENSC expanded energy efficiency measures in 2011, diversifying incentives beyond lighting in programs like EP-DI.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary 2.2.5 Impact Evaluation The impact evaluations integrated findings from the telephone surveys, program data from the tracking system, on-site visits and/or interviews wi...
AI summary The impact evaluation of ENSC programs integrated data from surveys, tracking systems, on-site visits, and billing analysis. Methods included metering for ARet/ARep programs and HOT20001 simulations for EEH/Performance Plus/Low Income. Billing analysis for LIR faced limitations due to low participation, though it was recommended for future use to enhance savings verification accuracy.
ately estimate savings in some instances. Recommendations presented for specific programs in the following sections include ways in which the billing analysis could support ENSC in future evaluations. The 2010 verification study also menti...
AI summary The text discusses challenges in evaluating energy efficiency programs due to complexities around early replacement of equipment. It highlights differing approaches by jurisdictions like New York and California, while noting no consensus exists. The evaluation did not address early replacement due to time constraints, emphasizing the need for careful consideration with ENSC.
No. Recommendations OV-R6. Adjust the tracked savings on the basis of the evaluation results: In order to provide a more precise estimation of savings, ENSC should track the gross and net savings of each program on the basis of the most re...
AI summary The recommendations focus on improving the accuracy and consistency of savings tracking for energy efficiency programs. ENSC is advised to adjust tracked savings based on evaluation results, use average unitary savings values for residential programs, and establish standardized data tracking protocols across all programs.
e. It would be useful to have at least the capacity, in litres per day, for dehumidifiers and in Btu per hour for room air conditioners, which is a key determinant of energy consumption for those appliances. ARet-R3. Pursue the metering of...
AI summary The text discusses the need to include capacity metrics for dehumidifiers and room air conditioners to assess energy consumption. It also suggests metering refrigerators and freezers at recycling facilities to improve savings calculations for DSM programs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary ARet-R4 Conduct on-site metering for dehumidifiers and room air conditioners: The metering conducted at the recycling facility included the consumption measurement of 29...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of an appliance retirement program (ARET) and an appliance replacement program (ARep) in Nova Scotia. It highlights the limitations of metering data collected at a recycling facility and recommends on-site metering during the summer in homes. The ARep program achieved energy and demand savings in 2011 through refrigerator and freezer replacements.
viewed the unitary savings estimates, using the metering data from the ARet program and the theoretical energy consumption of the new models installed, based on the ENERGY STAR-qualified product list. As for the process evaluation of the A...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program (ARep) highlights the importance of offering financing options to overcome barriers to purchasing large quantities of appliances. Retailers expressed high satisfaction with the program, but noted that upfront payment requirements limited participation. Recommendations include improving access to upfront capital for landlords.
as much as possible and ensure optimal success in program implementation. In that sense, ENSC could improve the availability of upfront capital from landlords. Ref.: 5725 25 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporatio...
AI summary The document highlights the need for ENSC to improve the availability of upfront capital for landlords to support program implementation. It also recommends adding a field in the tracking sheet to validate ENERGY STAR qualifications for appliances installed through the program.
ERGY STAR criterion and to identify the energy consumption of the appliance would ensure that savings are calculated correctly. 4.1.3 Retail Markdown Program The 2011 evaluation of the RMP demonstrated that the program used the right appro...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) showed increased participation and significant energy and demand savings. However, awareness of the program and its promotions decreased, with issues like disorganized displays and inadequate marketing materials identified as barriers to effectiveness.
s been conducted since the program started its activities. Therefore, the evaluation conducted this year for this program aimed to evaluate the electricity savings generated by the program since 2007. The 2007-2011 evaluation of the progra...
AI summary The evaluation of the program since 2007 shows net energy savings of 1.447 GWh and demand savings of 3.618 MW, though net savings fell short of tracked savings due to interactive effects and adjustments. The Low Income Renter Program (LIR) generated 4.756 GWh and 1.066 MW savings in 2011, but faced challenges due to limited participant eligibility.
. The program partners contacted during the in-depth interviews identified the main program barrier to be the limited number of participants as a result of the few eligible leads provided by housing Ref.: 5725 28 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Pro...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2011 DSM programs highlights that limited participant numbers due to few eligible leads from housing authorities and concerns about CFLs were identified as barriers. However, health risks from CFLs were not a major concern among participants. The program is deemed successful and recommendations are provided for improvement.
antages. It is to be noted that, for the most installed product (CFLs), only 1.6 percent were removed after installation, showing a high level of sustainability. Ref.: 5725 29 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporat...
AI summary The text discusses the sustainability of CFL installations, noting that only 1.6% were removed after installation, indicating a high level of long-term use. The reference points to an evaluation of 2011 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
ld lamps replaced is another element that could be relevant for validating the baseline case and for ensuring that the new lamps installed actually replaced less efficient lamps. At first, Econoler had planned to validate such information...
AI summary The document discusses the validation of energy savings from the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program (MURR) in 2011, highlighting the accuracy of tracking sheets and installation rates, particularly for CFLs. It also mentions the importance of verifying lamp replacements to ensure energy efficiency gains.
No. Recommendations MURR-R1. Review marketing material used for lobby events: The program partners have mentioned that the information related to time commitment shown on the marketing posters used to promote the lobby events was misleadin...
AI summary The recommendations focus on improving the marketing of lobby events for the MURR program to avoid misleading tenants about time commitments and enhancing participant education on the proper use of energy-saving products, such as power bars with integrated timers, to ensure long-term energy savings.
the absence of the program. This result shows the need for increasing awareness for energy efficiency in this market. 4.1.7 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program The 2011 evaluation of the EP-DI program demonstrated that the program...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Direct Install Program (EP-DI) has shown strong performance with significant energy savings, but relies heavily on direct outreach rather than marketing materials. Suggestions for improvement include better marketing and advertising strategies.
EP-DI-R1. Improve the tracking sheet to allow for a better validation of savings: Several fields in the tracking sheet are not required for program administration. Those fields are present even though they are not filled and should be remo...
AI summary The document recommends improving the EP-DI program's tracking sheet by removing unnecessary fields and ensuring required fields are consistently filled. It also suggests enhancing marketing strategies, as most participants learned about the program through direct interactions rather than marketing materials, and there is a desire for more effective advertising.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
EP-DI-R3. Require additional information during survey campaigns with commercial and industrial (C&I) customers as well as from participants and increase the number of on-site visits to better calculate savings: Additional information woul...
AI summary The text outlines the need for collecting additional information during survey campaigns with commercial and industrial customers to improve savings calculations for various energy efficiency measures. It also suggests increasing on-site visits for categories with a large number of projects to ensure reliable data collection and adjustment values.
nformation for these categories and the establishment of adjustment values that could be used to correct savings. 4.1.8 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program The 2011 evaluation of the EEH program demonstrated that it is a good energy effi...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program in 2011 achieved energy and demand savings, with 1,494 participants. Evaluation highlighted program success but noted concerns about future continuation due to uncertainty around federal government involvement and inconsistent marketing efforts.
savings. The Evaluator has the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: Table 19: Recommendations for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program
AI summary The Evaluator provides recommendations aimed at optimizing specific aspects of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, as outlined in Table 19.
No. Recommendations EEH-R1. Create a list of pre-approved contractors: During the in-depth interviews, some of the program partners mentioned the contractors’ deficient understanding of energy efficiency programs. The lack of experienced c...
AI summary The document recommends creating a list of pre-approved contractors, maintaining marketing efforts to ensure program continuation, and informing participants about expected savings to reduce cost barriers in energy efficiency programs.
ect, in terms of energy and money. This could be included in the pre- retrofit report with a view to reducing the perceived cost barrier. This improvement would also fulfill the participants’ request to have more information on the measure...
AI summary The text discusses improving the Energy Efficiency Home (EEH) program by providing more detailed information on recommended measures and their cost-saving benefits to reduce perceived cost barriers. It also suggests exploring on-bill financing for residential customers to help overcome financial barriers to implementing expensive energy efficiency measures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
EEH-R4. Collect the building energy consumption data for each house: The Evaluator recommends calculating the energy savings of each participant using the energy consumption data simulated by HOT2000. The energy consumption difference betw...
AI summary The document recommends improving the accuracy of energy savings calculations for building retrofits by using HOT2000 simulation data, adjusting for calibration errors, conducting detailed billing analysis, and randomly reviewing HOT2000 models to ensure reliability.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary Fuel-R4. Conduct a billing analysis in order to evaluate energy consumption for heating: A billing analysis would provide a more precise evaluation of the energy consump...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of conducting a billing analysis to evaluate heating energy consumption and improve energy savings calculations. It also suggests continuing to target participants for natural gas system installations to reduce free-ridership and increase program effectiveness.
s to natural gas heating systems present higher unitary savings as these systems seldom require the use of a secondary heating system. 4.1.10 Low Income Program The 2011 evaluation of the Low Income program demonstrated that the program ha...
AI summary The Low Income Program, evaluated in 2011, demonstrated significant success with 5,103 participants and generated notable energy and demand savings. However, confusion arose due to program name changes, and recommendations are made to improve clarity and optimize program aspects.
ENSC’s team. Econoler finds that the program works well overall and at a satisfactory level. The Evaluator has the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: Ref.: 5725 38 Evaluation of 2011 DSM Progr...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2011 DSM programs by Econoler finds that the program works well overall and at a satisfactory level. The Evaluator provides recommendations aimed at optimizing specific aspects of the Low Income Program.
No. Recommendations LI-R1. Assess the installation rate of certain prescriptive measures: In 2011, the savings related to the increase of EnerGuide points accounted for only 13 percent of total program energy savings, the remaining proport...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving energy efficiency program evaluations, including assessing the installation rate of prescriptive measures, reviewing HOT2000 models, and ensuring final audits are completed after implementing energy efficiency measures. These recommendations aim to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of program evaluations.
s organized for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program caused an increase in the number of participants in 2011 for both Low Income and EEH programs. As a result, the auditors became very busy in performing initial audits and impo...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program saw increased participation in 2011, leading to delays in audit completion. ENSC used a temporary estimate method to calculate savings, but should ensure sufficient staffing and protocols to complete final audits promptly after measures are implemented.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary 4.1.11 Performance Plus Program The 2011 evaluation of the Performance Plus program demonstrated that the program is well designed. The program totalled 701 participants...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Performance Plus program showed it is well-designed, with significant participation growth and notable energy and demand savings. Builders were identified as key partners, and participants were satisfied with the program. Recommendations aim to further optimize its performance.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
PP-R2. Improve program communication: The main recommendations expressed by homeowner participants were related to communication improvements. More specifically, the surveyed participants suggested improving the program by offering more in...
AI summary The document outlines several recommendations for improving the energy efficiency program. These include enhancing communication with participants, using HOT2000 simulation data for more accurate energy savings tracking, randomly reviewing HOT2000 models, and adding a measure of the percentage of heating delivered by electricity.
tia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary 4.2 COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL 4.2.1 Business Energy Rebates Program The 2011 evaluation of the BER program demonstrated that the program is well designed and has a good potential for success...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program saw significant growth in 2011, with 106 participants and substantial energy and demand savings. Evaluation highlighted the program's success but noted areas for improvement, including communication and marketing. The ENSC website was effective, but further engagement with participants is recommended to enhance program effectiveness.
ost reductions. Econoler finds that the program works well overall and at a satisfactory level. The Evaluator has the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: Table 23: Recommendations for the Busin...
AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates Program finds that it works well overall but recommends improvements in tracking sheets to better validate savings calculations and include sub-category details for more accurate evaluations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary
AI summary The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and its executive summary related to ECONOL:R, indicating a focus on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
BER-R2. Inform participants about expected customer savings: Once the final rebate is disbursed to clients, Econoler recommends informing them about the approximate savings to be expected from the project, in terms of energy and money. Thi...
AI summary The document outlines several recommendations for improving the BER program, including informing participants about expected savings, increasing promotion efforts, and collecting additional information to better calculate energy savings from various efficiency measures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary 4.2.2 Smart Lighting Choices Program The 2011 evaluation of the SLC program demonstrated that it is well designed and has a good potential for success. For the year 2011...
AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) was evaluated in 2011 and found to be well-designed with good potential for success. It achieved significant energy savings and increased sales of high-performance lighting products. The evaluation also identified opportunities for optimization.
collected from these customers. Such replacements would reduce program energy savings. In order to better evaluate the interactive effects factors, information on the heating source and on the use of air conditioning should also be collect...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the C&IC and CINC programs showed significant improvements in energy and peak demand savings, with a total of 32.93 GWh saved in 2011, compared to 19.4 GWh in 2010. The number of projects also increased substantially from 102 to 168.
hich represented a considerable increase in comparison to 2010 net savings (total of 19.4 GWh). In terms of demand savings, the C&IC program generated 3.764 MW in 2011 (compared to 2.4055 MW in 2010). In order for the number of participant...
AI summary The C&IC program has seen significant growth in participation and energy savings, with increased demand savings and program awareness driven by ENSC's marketing and prior participation in other programs. Econoler found the program to be generally effective but identified opportunities for improvement.
r has the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of each program: Table 25: Recommendations for the C&IC Program No. Recommendations C&IC-R1. Clearly define the M&V requirements before signing the PDA: The Evalua...
AI summary The document recommends clearly defining Measurement and Verification (M&V) requirements before signing the Project Development Agreement (PDA) for the C&IC Program. It highlights that most projects lack a dedicated M&V plan despite being marked as complete and approved. The Evaluator suggests using M&V plan templates compliant with the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) to standardize M&V activities.
ams Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary C&IC-R2. Envisage performing third-party M&V for a number of C&IC projects: ENSC should consider performing third-party M&V on projects where the implementation firm...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is advised to consider third-party M&V for C&IC projects where the implementation firm also conducts M&V, to ensure compliance with IPMVP and accuracy of results. A minimum energy savings threshold may be defined to determine when third-party M&V is required.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary CINC-R3. Clearly define the CPG minimum requirements at the early stage of the CINC projects: The Evaluator noticed that the M&V step of the program process was an issue...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends clearly defining the CPG minimum requirements early in CINC projects to improve M&V processes and encourages ENSC to provide detailed examples and templates. Additionally, the Evaluator suggests incorporating limited peak demand savings into project impact calculations for the CINC program to enhance overall program impact.
they could raise the overall impact of the program with future increases in the number of program participants. 4.2.4 Small Business Energy Solutions Program The 2011 evaluation of the SBES program demonstrated that the program is well des...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions Program (SBES) has shown positive results with increasing participation and energy savings. The 2011 evaluation noted 1,468 participants and energy savings of 23.180 GWh. Recommendations focus on improving communication and marketing to increase awareness and participation.
e paper mill in Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia. The M&V report was produced by EPS and is titled “Detailed Review of Completed Energy Efficiency Projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury,” October 17, 2011. The report methodology adhered to the...
AI summary The M&V report evaluated energy efficiency projects at a paper mill in Port Hawkesbury, using the SEP protocol based on IPMVP. The top-down analysis showed 154.2 GWh in energy savings, 26% higher than the bottom-up analysis. The evaluator concluded the savings are a fair representation of the project's impact.
eased quantity of TMP pulp produced internally at the plant. The utilization of the top-down savings vs. the bottom-up savings approach adheres to the SEP protocol for plant energy savings evaluation. The Evaluator concludes that annual en...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of an appliance retirement program in Nova Scotia, focusing on energy efficiency projects and their impact. It references energy savings metrics and protocols such as the SEP protocol for evaluating plant energy savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives and programs implemented during that period.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, which likely assesses the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs and initiatives in the region.
c Model ........................................... 2 Figure 2: Methodological Model .............................................................................................................. 3 Ref.: 5725 v Efficient Products – Applian...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program, run by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, assessed its impact through interviews, site visits, and a survey of participants. The program allowed residents to retire old appliances in exchange for rebates and collaborated with various partners for implementation.
a DA, Summerhill Group. An external call center, a transportation service and a recycler also acted as program partners in 2011 since the units were sent to be recycled once removed from the premises. The program aimed at achieving net ele...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program showed high participation and significant energy savings, with 8,211 units retired and 7.175 GWh of net energy savings. Awareness through advertising was a key factor in program success, though participants suggested improvements in marketing.
: Distortion Effects and Net-to-Gross Ratio 2011 Free-Ridership Level 22% Spillover Level 1% Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.79 The evaluation revealed that the ARet program had generated net energy savings of 7.175 GWh and demand savings of 1.144 MW...
AI summary The ARet program achieved net energy savings of 7.175 GWh and demand savings of 1.144 MW in 2011. These savings exceeded the tracked savings by ENSC by 71%, largely due to revised unitary savings values based on metering data and studies from Ontario.
programs in the overall executive summary of the 2011 demand-side management programs, the Evaluator has the following specific recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: ARet-R1. Strengthen the marketing strat...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program recommends strengthening marketing strategies to improve program awareness and address participant reluctance to retire functioning appliances. The program's success is attributed to current marketing efforts, but further improvements are needed.
ng. Moreover, marketing and advertising should be oriented towards the main program barrier identified, which is the reluctance to dispose of an appliance that still works. ARet-R2. Ensure that all information necessary for evaluation purp...
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of marketing strategies targeting the reluctance to dispose of functional appliances and outlines the need for comprehensive data collection in tracking sheets for program evaluation, including specific appliance details like capacity and energy consumption metrics.
least the capacity, in litres per day, for dehumidifiers and in Btu per hour for room air conditioners, which is a key determinant of energy consumption for those appliances. ARet-R3. Pursue the metering of refrigerators and freezers at th...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of metering energy consumption for retired appliances, specifically refrigerators, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room air conditioners, to accurately calculate energy savings. It recommends continuing this approach for future evaluations.
refrigerators, freezers and dehumidifiers, participants can now retire room air conditioner units. In order to be eligible, all appliances must be plugged in, in working order and older than 10 years. Participants can register to have thei...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement Program (ARET) allows participants to retire old appliances, offering rebates and free recycling. The program exceeded its 2010 target and achieved significant electricity and demand savings. It involves a delivery agent and sub-contractors for appliance pickup and recycling.
am logic model below shows the causal links between program activities and the changes expected in the market. Figure 1: Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Logic Model Ref.: 5725 2 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement P...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program. It includes a logic model showing causal links between program activities and market changes, as well as a methodological model with research tools and data sources such as the ENSC website, previous evaluation reports, and program manuals.
obtained from the following four sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation report; > program manual; and > tracking sheet. 2.2.2 In-Depth Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff conducted one interview in September with the Program...
AI summary The document outlines the data collection methods used in the evaluation of a program, including sources such as the ENSC website, evaluation reports, and interviews with the Program Manager and program partners. On-site visits were also conducted to gather information on appliance retirements through the ARet program.
thodology used for the on-site visits for the ARet program is further explained in the program impact evaluation section of this report. A copy of the site visit protocol is included in Appendix VII. Ref.: 5725 4 Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The report discusses the methodology used for on-site visits in the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program and mentions a participant survey conducted by Econoler’s subcontractor, Corporate Research Associates, Inc. (CRA), in 2011. The survey aimed to understand participant experiences and program impact.
y on the three most important appliances: refrigerators, freezers and room air conditioners. Considering all appliance types, the total population of participants in the program amounts to 6,596. Ref.: 5725 5 Efficient Products – Appliance...
AI summary The document outlines the process evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focusing on assessing the program's design and delivery effectiveness through interviews and surveys. It also discusses the content of the ARet program manual used by program staff and evaluators.
s found in the ARet program manual. Table 4: Program Manual Content Program Manual Content ARet Program Manual Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives...
AI summary The document outlines the content of the ARet Program Manual, which includes sections on program description, incentives, eligibility criteria, cost-effectiveness tests, marketing and evaluation plans, and program theory. It also references a 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Evaluator can keep track of the assumptions used to estimate the program objectives. Moreover, the parameters should be continually adjusted based on the most recent evaluation results. Ref.: 5725 7 Efficient Products – Appliance Retiremen...
AI summary The text discusses the need to refine marketing plans and update the program manual for the Appliance Retirement Program to ensure consistency, track changes, and standardize content for better monitoring and evaluation.
corrected by the recycler once it is at the plant. Therefore, since it remains relatively low, Econoler accepts the fact that a few appliances under the age limitation of the program can slip through. Estimated annual energy consumptions a...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used by the recycler to estimate annual energy consumption for retired appliances, including the use of EnerGuide ratings, historical data, and extrapolation for older models. It also notes that some appliances may slip through the program's age limitations.
d with the high number of program participants, show that program marketing generated a good level of customer awareness. Table 5: How Participants Found Out About the Program Sources of Awareness 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 90 Utility/sponso...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses how participants in the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program became aware of the program through various channels, with utility/sponsor advertising being the most common source. Most participants enrolled over the phone.
6% 3 Reduce maintenance costs/appliance 4% needed repairs Other 8% 1% Don’t know/refused 3% 2% Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 15 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Jus...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that 53% of respondents believe retired appliances are recycled, 20% believe hazardous materials are eliminated, and 22% do not know what happens to the appliances after collection. The program should improve communication about appliance disposal.
ated that participants found it easy to participate. As mentioned in the program manual, the main program barrier among consumers is related to the reluctance to dispose of a device that still works. Table 11: Concerns prior to Taking part...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses concerns and participation barriers in the Appliance Retirement Program, noting that only 2% of participants had concerns, while 97% did not. It also highlights that over half of those who had a refrigerator removed had a second refrigerator, and 4% had a non-functional one.
ho retired a dehumidifier also ended up acquiring a new unit. It is to be noted that 23 percent of participants who retired a refrigerator that was not a primary refrigerator have since replaced it. Table 15: Replacement of Appliances 2010...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses appliance replacement rates among participants in the Appliance Retirement Program. It notes that 23% of participants who retired a non-primary refrigerator replaced it, and 33% of those who replaced a refrigerator used a second-hand model. Most replaced appliances were new models.
13% 4% Don’t know/ 1 refused Base: Respondents that replaced appliances retired through the program Ref.: 5725 20 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Among respondents...
AI summary The report discusses appliance replacement under the Appliance Retirement Program, noting that most respondents who replaced retired appliances selected ENERGY STAR®-qualified products. The data shows high adoption rates of energy-efficient appliances in 2010 and 2011.
ppliance retired through the program (see Section 3.7.4), indicate the importance of secondary appliances for consumers. It could also explain consumer reluctance to get rid of a working appliance. Table 19: Importance of Secondary Refrige...
AI summary The table highlights the importance consumers place on secondary refrigerators and freezers, with a significant percentage considering them 'absolutely necessary.' This insight helps explain consumer reluctance to retire working appliances through the Appliance Retirement Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.6 Appliances Remaining in Home The majority of respondents have one refrigerator or freezer remaining in their home (73% and 58%, respectively). Eight of the twelve respondents...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report indicates that most respondents have one refrigerator or freezer remaining in their home, with 73% and 58% respectively. The report also shows that 55% of those with refrigerators have a unit less than five years old, while 23% have a refrigerator older than 10 years.
7% years old Don’t know/ 2% 1 1 refused Ref.: 5725 22 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For respondents with freezers remaining, the freezer is generally less than f...
AI summary The report indicates that 81% of freezers remaining with respondents are less than five years old, suggesting a relatively new appliance base. This data may be relevant to appliance retirement programs and efficiency initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.7 Program Influence In terms of the importance of various factors in influencing the decision to remove the appliance through the program, removal and recycling being free was t...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's program on appliance removal decisions. The most significant factor was the provision of free removal and recycling services, followed by information provided through the program and the incentive offered.
7.5 7.0 6.4 program The $10 or $35 incentive provided by ENSC 6.8 6.0 5.4 3.7.8 Impact of Program Respondents were asked to rate how much improvement they had noticed with respect to a number of areas. Six in 10 respondents offered a ratin...
AI summary The program provided by ENSC offers $10 or $35 incentives. Respondents reported improvements in interest in energy efficiency (61%), knowledge of appliances (40%), and knowledge of energy efficiency (43%), though fewer noted reductions in total energy costs (36%).
1 12 21 1 2 improved Reduction in total energy costs 90 24% 12 10 6 18 28 2 improved Ref.: 5725 24 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Most respondents did not report...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that most respondents were satisfied with the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, with a very high overall satisfaction score of 96%. Only a small percentage reported any drawbacks, such as loss of food storage space or disposal of usable appliances.
(17%) offering a rating of 4, where 1 is “extremely dissatisfied” and 5 “extremely satisfied.” The overall satisfaction score for this program is therefore very high (96%, or a mean of 4.7 out of 5). Table 27: Satisfaction with Program Ove...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program received high satisfaction ratings, with a mean score of 4.7 out of 5 in 2011. Almost all respondents (98%) would recommend the program, indicating strong satisfaction, although a few found it too cumbersome or lacked confidence in the organization.
ements needed 7 No recommendations 56 71 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 26 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Four in 10 respondents (40%) do not believe a diagram ill...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program found that while 40% of respondents did not believe a diagram would facilitate participation, 28% believed it would significantly help. Around half (46%) thought the diagram would be helpful, suggesting that the flow chart developed by ENSC was a positive initiative to simplify future participation.
on. To do so, Econoler reviewed the following parameters: > adjusted unitary savings; > energy-to-demand ratio; > interactive effects; > free-ridership; and > spillover. The review of the unitary savings calculations is mainly based on the...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program in 2011, focusing on parameters like unitary savings, free-ridership, and spillover effects. It also describes the sampling methodology for on-site visits and the types of appliances retired, with refrigerators being the most common.
used appliance replaced the unit retired, specifications of this appliance were collected by the Evaluator to, among other things, determine whether the new appliance met ENERGY STAR specifications. Ref.: 5725 29 Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, noting that estimated savings for appliances are not tracked in the tracking sheet. Instead, the annual energy consumption of retired appliances is recorded, and a metering activity was conducted at the recycling facility to measure energy consumption using a protocol based on the New York Technical Resource Manual.
metering test of 26 hours. The table below presents the number of units tested for each appliance retired through the program. Table 32: Number of Appliances Metered Number of Units Number of Units Appliance Retired Tested Refrigerators 4,...
AI summary The document discusses the appliance retirement program, focusing on the number of units tested for each appliance type and the calculation of unitary savings values for refrigerators. It references a technical resource manual and outlines parameters considered in the evaluation process.
conoler reviewed the savings estimations used to monitor the gross savings generated by the refrigerators retired through the program. To do so, the following parameters were taken into consideration: > average consumption of refrigerators...
AI summary Econoler analyzed the average energy consumption of retired refrigerators using metering data, factoring in manufacture year and proportion of refrigerators in the tracking sheet to calculate an average annual consumption of 78.1 kWh per cubic foot.
ased on the manufacture year of the retired refrigerators monitored in the 2011 tracking sheet, these average values were weighted to establish an average consumption value of 78.1 kWh per cubic foot. The average size of the retired refrig...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report calculates the average annual energy consumption of retired refrigerators as 1,226 kWh based on their size and efficiency. It notes that metering data already account for efficiency degradation, eliminating the need for a degradation factor this year.
ing data already take into account the degradation of the appliances over time. Hence, no degradation factor needs to be applied to the average annual consumption calculated for retired refrigerators. Econoler decided to use average annual...
AI summary Econoler used average annual consumption data for retired refrigerators instead of applying a degradation factor, as metering data already accounted for appliance degradation. Refrigerators were categorized based on replacement status, with primary units assumed to be replaced and secondary units having a 23% replacement rate based on participant surveys.
icipant survey was used to establish a replacement ratio. As mentioned in Section 3.7.4, from the participants who had secondary refrigerators retired through the program, 23 percent replaced them. Ref.: 5725 32 Efficient Products – Applia...
AI summary The report evaluates the replacement ratio of retired refrigerators under the Appliance Retirement Program. Primary refrigerators had a 100% replacement rate, while secondary refrigerators had a 23% replacement rate. Of those who replaced refrigerators, 67% opted for new models and 33% for used ones.
eplaced, 67 percent were replaced with a new refrigerator and 33 percent with a used model. These proportions are the same among participants who have replaced their primary or secondary refrigerator. In the 2010 evaluation, new replacemen...
AI summary The evaluation of refrigerator replacements shows that 67% of replaced units were new, and 33% were used. Energy consumption assumptions differ between new and used models, with new models now predominantly ENERGY STAR-qualified, reducing average annual energy consumption to 363 kWh.
US et al., Residential Retrofit High Impact Measure Evaluation Report, February 8, 2010. 4 ENERGY STAR, Refrigerators Qualified Product List, www.energystar.gov, list posted on January 17, 2012. Ref.: 5725 33 Efficient Products – Appliance...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy consumption of replacement refrigerators under the Appliance Retirement Program. It references data from Natural Resources Canada and assumes that used refrigerators 5 to 10 years old still have market value and energy consumption levels similar to 2003 estimates.
ENERGY STAR 2008 NRCan 2003 NRCan Energy Consumption (kWh/yr) 363 479 487 By applying the percentages of refrigerators replaced by ENERGY STAR models and standard models, the average energy consumption for new refrigerators is equal to the...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of average energy consumption for new refrigerators, using ENERGY STAR and standard models, and the use of partial use factors for secondary refrigerators. It references data from Natural Resources Canada and outlines how Econoler estimated plug-in patterns for secondary refrigerators.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > most of the time – the refrigerator was plugged in for nine months of the year; > occasionally – the refrigerator was plugged in for four months of the year; > never – the refrige...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the partial use factors for retired refrigerators, distinguishing between primary and secondary units. It uses data on how often refrigerators were plugged in during the year to calculate these factors.
20% Never - 0 10% Partial Use Factor 1.00 0.85 0.74 Ref.: 5725 35 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Lab-to-on-Site Factor Energy consumption estimates from manufactu...
AI summary The document discusses the use of a lab-to-on-site factor to adjust energy consumption estimates for replacement refrigerators, based on manufacturer data. This factor accounts for real-world variables such as door openings and indoor temperature, with a value of 0.82 established in the 2010 evaluation of the California Appliance Retirement program.
or. Table 38: Unitary Savings Values for Retired Refrigerators Refrigerator Category Primary – Replaced Secondary – Replaced Secondary – Not Replaced Average Consumption – Unit Retired 1,226 1,226 1,226 (kWh/yr) Occupant Adjustment Factor...
AI summary Table 38 provides unitary savings values for retired refrigerators in different categories, including average consumption, replacement percentages, and savings calculations. The data includes factors like occupant adjustment and lab-to-on-site adjustments, with an average unitary savings value of 1,004 kWh/yr.
gs Value 1,004 kWh/yr 10 New York Department of Public Service, Technical Resource Manual for Multifamily Replacement Refrigerators, September 29, 2010. Ref.: 5725 37 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The document presents an evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on energy savings calculations for refrigerators and freezers. It details the methodology used to estimate average unitary savings values, including data from metering activities and participant surveys.
nual consumption of the freezers retired through the program, Econoler used the data from the metering activity. In total, the annual energy consumption of 46 freezers was tested during this activity. In order to estimate an average consum...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program analyzed the annual energy consumption of 46 retired freezers. The average consumption was calculated based on the freezers' manufacture years, resulting in an average of 82.6 kWh per cubic foot.
ulations. Average Consumption of Replacement Freezers According to the participant survey, when freezers were replaced, 82 percent were replaced with a new freezer and 18 percent with a used model. The same approach as with refrigerators w...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the average energy consumption of replacement freezers, noting that 82% of replacements were new freezers, with 87% of those being ENERGY STAR-qualified. Used freezers had higher energy consumption compared to new models. Energy consumption estimates were based on data from Natural Resources Canada.
per year. Table 40: Annual Energy Consumption Estimates for Replacement Freezers Replacement Category New ENERGY STAR New Standard Model Used Source ENERGY STAR 2008 NRCan 2003 NRCan Consumption (kWh/yr) 353 375 369 By applying the percent...
AI summary The document provides annual energy consumption estimates for replacement freezers, including ENERGY STAR models, standard models, and used freezers. It discusses partial use factors based on participant survey data, which account for the fact that secondary freezers are not used year-round.
ed Product List, www.energystar.gov, list posted on January 17, 2012. 12 Natural Resources Canada, Energy Consumption of Major Household Appliances Shipped in Canada, Trends from 1990- 2008, p.71. Ref.: 5725 40 Efficient Products – Applian...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of partial use factors for secondary freezers in the Appliance Retirement Program, using a sample size of 39 freezers. It also mentions the application of a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.82 for freezers, similar to the approach used for refrigerators.
n-Site Factor As with refrigerators, a lab-to-on-site factor must be applied to the consumption values estimated for replacement freezers. The same lab-to-on-site factor of 0.82 is used for freezers. For the retired freezers, no lab-to-on-...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings values for retired freezers under the Appliance Retirement Program. It outlines the application of lab-to-on-site factors and adjustments for metered consumption, similar to methods used for refrigerators.
lab-to-on-site factor. Table 42: Unitary Savings Values for Retired Freezers Freezer Category Secondary – Replaced Secondary – Not Replaced Average Consumption – Unit Retired 1,223 1,223 (kWh/yr) Occupant Adjustment Factor 1.12 1.12 Replac...
AI summary This text presents a table and calculation example for unitary savings values of retired freezers, including factors like average consumption, replacement rates, and adjustment factors. The average unitary savings value for freezers is estimated at 1,117 kWh per year based on participant survey proportions.
untered in homes when using their dehumidifier. Moreover, the capacity of the metered dehumidifiers was rarely available, which complicated the analysis. Average Consumption of Retired Dehumidifiers The evaluation team of the OPA’s 2008 Ev...
AI summary This text discusses the evaluation of dehumidifier energy consumption, focusing on the average capacity and energy factor (EF) of older units. The study involved 36 homes in Ontario and used data from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Econoler to estimate annual usage in Nova Scotia. Adjustments were made to the EF based on laboratory testing of units recycled through the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program.
he Ontario Power Authority’s 2008 Every Kilowatt Counts Power Savings Event, Keep Cool Pilot and Rewards for Recycling Programs, Final Report, Prepared for the Ontario Power Authority, July 9, 2009. Ref.: 5725 43 Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The document references an evaluation report on appliance retirement programs, comparing energy consumption estimates from different regions, including Wisconsin and Nova Scotia. It discusses the use of 1,114 annual operating hours for dehumidifiers in Nova Scotia, leading to an average annual consumption of 1,224 kWh for old dehumidifiers retired.
/ 1,224 / 0.66 / 24 / Replacement Ratio The dehumidifiers retired through the program can be subsequently replaced or not, which changes the unitary savings value attributable to the retirement. In order to take into account the actions ta...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of unitary savings value for dehumidifiers retired through a program, considering whether they are replaced. Econoler used a participant survey to establish a replacement ratio, finding that 64% of 11 participants replaced their retired dehumidifiers. This ratio is used instead of the previous assumption of 100% replacement.
9, 2009. 16 Efficiency Vermont, Technical Reference User Manual (TRM), p. 305, 12/30/2008. 17 ENERGY STAR, Dehumidifier energy savings calculator, www.energystar.gov, assumption from EPA 2006. Ref.: 5725 44 Efficient Products – Appliance R...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program estimates the average annual energy consumption of replacement dehumidifiers, assuming they were replaced with ENERGY STAR-qualified units. Based on ENERGY STAR eligibility criteria, the average consumption is estimated at 538 kWh per year.
538 / 1.50 / 24 / Unitary Savings Value Calculation Econoler calculated the unitary savings value for both categories of dehumidifiers (replaced and not replaced). Starting with the average annual consumption value estimated for the dehumi...
AI summary The document presents a calculation of unitary savings values for dehumidifiers, distinguishing between replaced and not replaced units. It uses average consumption values and replacement ratios to estimate an average unitary savings value of 880 kWh/yr.
880 kWh/yr 18 ENERGY STAR, Program Requirements for Dehumidifiers – Eligibility Criteria – version 3.0, http://www.energystar.gov/specifications. Ref.: 5725 45 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary The document discusses the average annual energy savings of 880 kWh for dehumidifiers and the inclusion of room air conditioners in the Appliance Retirement Program. Due to distorted metering data, savings estimates for room air conditioners were based on a similar program's results.
tary savings value for room air conditioners using the evaluation results from a similar program: the OPA’s Every Kilowatt Counts program.19 Average Consumption of Retired Room Air Conditioner Units Based on the evaluation of the OPA’s 200...
AI summary This text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from retiring old room air conditioners, using data from the OPA’s Every Kilowatt Counts program. It outlines the average annual consumption of retired units and notes the challenge of determining replacement ratios due to limited survey data for room air conditioners.
were established from the participant survey. However, since the number of participants for room air conditioners was small in comparison with other appliances, they were not included in the survey. 19 The Cadmus Group, Evaluation of the O...
AI summary The evaluation of the appliance retirement program in Nova Scotia considers the replacement of retired room air conditioners with ENERGY STAR-qualified units, based on participant surveys and data from the Ontario Power Authority's 2008 program evaluation.
aced by new ENERGY STAR-qualified units. For the new ENERGY STAR-qualified units, Econoler used the following parameters, also based on the evaluation of the OPA’s 2008 Every Kilowatt Counts program: > an EER value of 10.7 Btu/W-h, which c...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings value for retired room air conditioners, using parameters such as EER, capacity, and hours of operation. It references the OPA’s 2008 program and estimates annual consumption for new ENERGY STAR-qualified units in Nova Scotia.
1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 Total Gross Demand Savings – at Generator (MW) 0.757 0.510 0.160 0.011 Ref.: 5725 49 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EF...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of replacing old appliances with energy-efficient ones in Nova Scotia, noting that while such replacements may increase heating loads in winter and decrease cooling loads in summer, the overall impact is considered insignificant by Econoler due to various factors.
2011 Evaluation Report the appliances retired through the in-store weekend events conducted during retail markdown campaigns, a free-ridership level of 0 percent will be used. The approach used by Econoler was consistent with evaluation, m...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the methodology used to assess free-ridership and internal spillover effects of an appliance retirement program. Econoler's approach considers various factors influencing customer decision-making and uses participant surveys to measure internal spillover effects.
he equation below. The energy savings (kWh) associated with the additional retirements were estimated using the adjusted unitary savings value reviewed in this evaluation for each type of appliances. % From the 90 participants surveyed, tw...
AI summary The evaluation report estimates energy savings from the Appliance Retirement Program, considering spillover effects and free-ridership. It calculates a net energy savings of 6.493 GWh and 1.036 MW at the meter, and 7.175 GWh and 1.144 MW at the generator, using the NTGR value of 0.79.
Initial Gross NTGR Net Savings Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 5.661 GWh 0.74 4.189 GWh Evaluation Results 9.020 GWh 0.80 7.175 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.903 MW 0.74 0.668 MW Evaluation Results 1.439 M...
AI summary This report evaluates the Energy Savings and Demand Savings from the Appliance Retirement Program (ARET) and other efficiency initiatives by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in 2011. Tracked and evaluated savings are presented, with a note on the NTGR used for different retirement methods.
rmation on the model, such as the capacity and the age of manufacture, and information on usage patterns by asking the participants during which seasons they operate their appliances and for how long. The NTGR was evaluated at 0.79 for the...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program discusses the Net Total Gross Replacement (NTGR) rates for appliances retired through the program and in-store events, as well as the assessment of free-ridership and interactive effects on home energy consumption. The NTGR was slightly higher than previously used, and free-ridership was estimated at 1 percent.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives or programs. It likely outlines performance, outcomes, and recommendations related to energy efficiency efforts in Nova Scotia.
m air conditioners, which is a key determinant of energy consumption for those appliances. Information on the number of months the appliance is used could also be useful in order to estimate the partial use factor for refrigerators and fre...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving data collection and program implementation in energy efficiency initiatives. It highlights the need to standardize data entry, use drop-down lists, and address customer reluctance to replace working appliances as key barriers to program success.
tified is the customers’ resistance to get rid of a working Implementation appliance. Econoler recommends that the marketing strategy be oriented towards that specific barrier. Ref.: 5725 56 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Progra...
AI summary The text discusses customer resistance to retiring functional appliances and suggests that the marketing strategy should address this specific barrier. It references an evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, providing an overview of the organization's activities and performance during that year.
No 1 2 Don’t know/refused 1 1 All respondents reside in their home year round. Table 56: Residency in Home Residency in Home 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 90 Year round residence 96% 100% Seasonal/vacation home 3 Don’t know/ Refused 1 Ref.: 572...
AI summary The document presents data on residency patterns and household income from an evaluation report of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It highlights that most respondents live in their homes year-round and provides income distribution statistics for 2010 and 2011.
000 to $79,999 7 4 $80,000 or more 24 23 Don’t know/refused 27 22 Six in 10 respondents are female (62%), while four in 10 are male (38%). Table 58: Gender Gender 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 90 Female 56% 62% Male 44 38 Ref.: 5725 61 Efficien...
AI summary The text includes demographic data on respondents, a table showing gender distribution in 2010 and 2011, and excerpts from an interview guide related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Questions focus on cost-effectiveness, municipal electrical distributors, and savings calculations when appliances are replaced.
s concerning relatively high free ridership levels? Q: What is the status regarding the recommendation to screen the free-ridership? C: Cream skimming could look like a lot of free riders. Page 51 ARR-R12 Q: what is the status about this r...
AI summary The text discusses questions and comments regarding free ridership levels, communication issues among multiple organizations, and the evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program. It also raises inquiries about data sources, distortion effects, barriers to appliance retirement, and the evaluation processes used.
evaluation? And if not why? Q: was there an evaluation plan when this program was first designed? Q: Is there a written marketing and outreach strategy for that program with performance indicators? Q: How would you rate the facility or dif...
AI summary The document includes a series of evaluation questions for the Appliance Retirement Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), as well as an interview guide for program partners. The questions focus on program evaluation, marketing strategy, and ease of use of a centralized database.
u had that role (specify months or years)? Q1b - If you were a program partner before it changed status and name from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, how was this transition perceived in the market? Not applicable Unnoticed Some confusion A...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the transition of a program from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, the impact on relationships with the Program Administrator, and complaints received from program participants. It references an evaluation report from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions related to the efficiency program and appliance retirement program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about participation process, satisfaction ratings, suggestions for improvement, and outreach activities.
ou answered Yes to Q8, we would like your opinion on the frequency of these evaluations. Too frequent Adequate No opinion Part II: Questions Specific to the Appliance Retirement Program Q9 – We would like your opinion on the number of thir...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on stakeholder opinions regarding program frequency, number of third parties involved, market confusion, relationships with partners, and program name changes. It also includes evaluation scales and open-ended response opportunities.
n regard to the program name that has changed from ‘’Pull the Plug’’ to Appliance Retirement and Replacement Program (ARR) and to Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) since its first implementation? Q14- What is your opinion in regard to pr...
AI summary The text discusses the renaming of a program from 'Pull the Plug' to the Appliance Retirement and Replacement Program (ARR) and Appliance Retirement Program (ARet), and asks about program modifications, complaints from partners, and barriers to implementation. The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
d we hope that they will contribute to improving program performance. If we need to clarify some of your answers, we might call you back. Your name Date Phone number with area code E-mail Ref.: 5725 71 Efficient Products – Appliance Retire...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for contractors involved in the Appliance Retirement Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It outlines the process for completing a questionnaire to evaluate program performance and includes instructions for submission.
2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is ve...
AI summary The text contains a series of survey questions from a 2011 evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions aim to assess participant satisfaction, program complexity, and suggestions for improvement, including views on marketing, outreach, and third-party involvement.
our opinion on the number of third parties involved in this program other than you (delivery agent, transport contractor, call center). Are they? Too few Adequate Too many No opinion Q9a- If you answered Too Few or Too Many, please comment...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking about the number of third parties involved, market confusion, relationship ratings with program partners, lead sources, and opinions on program name changes and modifications.
y. Someone would have come to your home and picked up your old appliance. You would have received a $10 or $35 rebate also.”] IF PERSIST AS NO, THANK, TERMINATE AND RECORD. V2. [ASK IF V1=3] Let me clarify, I am talking about the Efficienc...
AI summary The text discusses the Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance Retirement program, which involved removing and recycling refrigerators, freezers, and dehumidifiers from homes and providing rebates for participation. The text includes questions about the number of appliances picked up through the program.
98=Don’t Know, 99=Refused] V5. [IF V2c. = YES] How many dehumidifiers were picked up through the Appliance Retirement Program? [Record number, 98=Don’t Know, 99=Refused] Ref.: 5725 80 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Effic...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking about participation numbers and reasons for appliance disposal. It also references an evaluation report from 2011 and lists sources through which participants learned about the program.
– MULTIPLE RESPONSE) Age/Need 1. (Old unit was not working well) 2. (Didn’t need/use it any more) Replacing unit 3. (Bought new appliance) Ref.: 5725 81 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2...
AI summary The text outlines reasons for replacing appliances under the Appliance Retirement Program, including age, housing changes, financial incentives, logistical convenience, and environmental concerns. It also asks about concerns participants had before joining the program.
(Refused) P3. Before participating, did you have any concerns about taking part in the program? 1. (Yes) 2. (No) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 82 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporat...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation concerns in the Appliance Retirement Program and what happens to retired appliances. It outlines responses such as concerns about appliance replacement, rebate amounts, and process complexity, as well as perceptions about appliance recycling and disposal.
READ. PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] S4. How did you initially sign up for the program? Did you sign up over the phone with a toll free number or did you sign up online? 1. (Over the phone) 2. (Signed up online) 3. (Both) 98....
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on how participants signed up, their experience with online and phone sign-up processes, and difficulties encountered. It also asks for recommendations to improve the program.
99. (Refused) [PROGRAMMER: EACH RESPONDENT WILL BE ASKED ABOUT ONE TO TWO APPLIANCES – NOT ALL THREE. NO RESPONDENT WILL BE ASKED ABOUT TWO OF A SAME APPLIANCE (E.G., NOT TWO REFRIGERATORS)]. Ref.: 5725 86 Efficient Products – Appliance Re...
AI summary The text outlines survey instructions for respondents in the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on refrigerator removals. It specifies that respondents will be asked about one or two appliances, not all three, and ensures no respondent is asked about two of the same appliance. It also provides clarification on how to classify the removed refrigerator as main, secondary, or unused.
.” [NOTE: If respondent recently bought a new refrigerator and was just waiting for the previously used one to be picked up by the program, it should be classified as “Main/Primary”] 1. Used as Main/Primary 2. Used as a Spare/Secondary at...
AI summary This text outlines a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on the status and age of removed refrigerators, including whether they were primary, secondary, or unused.
USED AS A SECONDARY REFRIGERATOR?’ RECORD] 99. (Refused) RF4. [IF RF1 = 3] Approximately how long had the refrigerator been unused when you decided to get rid of it? [RECORD] 1. Months [RECORD 1 to 11 months] 2. Years [RECORD 1 to 50 years...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the retirement of a refrigerator under an appliance retirement program, focusing on how long the appliance was unused, its condition, and its usage prior to retirement.
2011 Evaluation Report RF8. Where in the house was the refrigerator most recently located? [RANDOMIZE AND READ 1- 5, THEN 96 – CHECK ONLY ONE] 1. Basement 2. Kitchen 3. Garage 4. Porch 5. Laundry room 96. Some other place [SPECIFY _] 98. (...
AI summary The text contains survey questions from a 2011 evaluation report regarding the location of refrigerators and participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance Retirement Program. It includes questions about disposal methods and considerations prior to the program.
d 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused j. Postponing getting rid of it. 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused Ref.: 5725 90 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Sco...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, asking respondents how they would have disposed of an old refrigerator if the program had not been available and how long they would have postponed disposal.
when the Program took it or more than a year later? 1. Within a year of when the program took it 2. More than a year later 98. Don’t Know 99. Refused Ref.: 5725 91 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Co...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on the timing of program participation and the perceived importance of incentives in the decision to remove and recycle refrigerators.
Responses a. The $35 incentive provided _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused by Efficiency Nova Scotia b. Information or advice _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused received from the program c. Removal and recycling services provided for...
AI summary The text discusses responses to questions about the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, including incentives, information received, and removal and recycling services. It also asks about willingness to pay for refrigerator removal and includes questions about replacing the retired appliance.
e replacement refrigerator new or used when you started using it as the replacement refrigerator? 1. New 2. Used 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) RE3. Where did you get the replacement refrigerator? [DON’T READ] 1. (Sears) 2. (Home Depot) 3....
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to refrigerator replacement, including whether the refrigerator is new or used, where it was purchased, and if it has the ENERGY STAR label. It also includes a section about remaining refrigerators in use after program participation.
refrigerator through the program? [RECORD NUMBER] _ [98 Don’t know, 99 Refused] [IF 0 GO TO FZ1 (Freezer Series)]. IF ‘DON’T KNOW’ OR ‘REFUSED’ TO RRF1, SKIP TO FZ SERIES RRF2a through RRF2c. [FOR EACH REFRIGERATOR IN RRF1, ASK “Approximat...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for participants in the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on refrigerator and freezer removals. It includes instructions for data collection, such as determining the age of refrigerators and selecting one freezer for detailed questioning.
alone freezer removed through the program. For purposes of this survey, pick just one of the freezers removed and keep just that one freezer clearly in your mind as you answer the next few questions. FZ1. In the year prior to getting rid o...
AI summary This text contains survey questions from an appliance retirement program evaluation, specifically focusing on freezer removal. It asks participants about the usage frequency, age, and condition of the freezer prior to removal.
2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99. Refused c. Taking it to a recycling center 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98. Don’t Know _ 99.Refused d. Hiring someone to take it for recycling 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Cons...
AI summary This text presents a survey question about disposal options for an appliance and asks respondents to indicate which alternative they would have most likely used if the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program was not available.
this freezer had not been available. Which one of these other alternatives that we’ve just discussed would you have been most likely to do? (DO NOT READ; INDICATE ONE RESPONSE ONLY) IF NEEDED: Your best estimate is okay. 1. (Sold it) 2. (G...
AI summary This text is a survey question related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking respondents about their disposal plans for an old freezer if the program had not been available, and how soon they would have disposed of it if the program had taken it.
received from the program c. Removal and recycling services provided for free as _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused part of the program Ref.: 5725 99 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from an evaluation report on the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on participants' willingness to pay for removal and recycling services and details about replacement freezers.
Buy) 4. (Lowe’s) 5. (Wal-Mart) 6. (Target) 7. (Sam’s Club) 8. (Costco) 9. (Yard/garage sale) 10. (Friend/relative) Ref.: 5725 100 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on freezer replacement and energy efficiency. It includes response options for where old freezers were obtained and whether replacement freezers have the ENERGY STAR label.
w old is your freezer.” [IF MORE THAN ONE FREEZER, ASK ABOUT UP TO THREE FREEZERS INSERTING “first”, “second,” or “third” BEFORE “freezer” AS APPROPRIATE, BASED ON RFZ1 RESPONSE.] 1. 0 to 5 years old 2. 6 to 10 years old 3. 11 to 15 years...
AI summary The text is part of a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about the age and usage frequency of freezers and dehumidifiers removed through the program.
4. Never 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) DH2. Approximately how old was the dehumidifier you had removed through the program? Was it [READ, CHECK ONE]: 1. 0 to 5 years old 2. 6 to 10 years old 3. 11 to 15 years old 4. 16 to 20 years old 5....
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks about the age, usage, and condition of dehumidifiers removed through the program.
ong had you been using the dehumidifier when you decided to get rid of it? 1. Months [RECORD 1 to 11 months] 2. Years [RECORD 1 to 50 years, round to the nearest year (Don’t know) [PROBE: ‘CAN YOU GIVE AN APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF TIME THAT TH...
AI summary The text is part of a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on dehumidifier free-ridership. It asks participants about the duration of use, location, and whether they had considered disposing of the dehumidifier before learning about the program.
tive ways that you could have disposed of this appliance. For each, tell me if this is a method you had considered using or doing. [RANDOMIZE] Did you consider … a. Selling it 1.Yes - Considered 2. No – Did not consider 98. Don’t Know _ 99...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program. It asks respondents about methods they considered for disposing of an appliance, including selling, recycling, and storing it.
on’t Know _ 99.Refused i. Storing it unplugged 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused j. Postponing getting rid of it. 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused DFR3. Now suppose t...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question about appliance disposal alternatives, specifically focusing on the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program and how respondents would have handled their old dehumidifier if the program had not been available. It also asks about the timing of disposal if they had postponed getting rid of the appliance.
ting rid of your dehumidifier. How soon would you have disposed of your old dehumidifier? Would you have disposed if it within a year of when the Program took it or more than a year later? 1. Within a year of when the program took it 2. Mo...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on customer behavior regarding the disposal of dehumidifiers, likelihood of paying for recycling, and the importance of program incentives and information in decision-making.
by Efficiency Nova Scotia b. Information or advice _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused received from the program c. Removal and recycling services provided for free as _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused part of the program Ref.: 5725...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, including willingness to pay for removal and recycling services and questions about replacement dehumidifiers. It outlines response options and instructions for data collection.
as the replacement dehumidifier? 1. New 2. Used 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) DHE3. Where did you get the replacement dehumidifier? [DON’T READ] 1. (Sears) 2. (Home Depot) 3. (Best Buy) 4. (Lowe’s) 5. (Wal-Mart) 6. (Target) 7. (Sam’s Club...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to dehumidifier replacement and usage, including where respondents obtained their replacement dehumidifier and whether it has an ENERGY STAR label. It also includes a question about the number of stand-alone dehumidifiers currently in use.
2011 Evaluation Report REMAINING DEHUMIDIFIERS [DHZ SERIES] DHZ1. How many stand-alone dehumidifiers are currently in use in your home? [RECORD NUMBER] _ [RECORD NUMBER, 98 Don’t know, 99 Refused] [IF 0 GO TO SO SERIES] IF “DON’T KNOW’ OR...
AI summary This text is part of a 2011 evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program. It includes survey questions about the number and age of dehumidifiers in use, as well as questions about appliance disposal after participating in the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report [GO TO IM1 IF SO1=2 OR 98 OR 99] SO2. What other appliance(s) have you disposed of WITHOUT RECEIVING A REBATE since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance retirement pr...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2011 Evaluation Report, asking participants about additional appliances disposed of without a rebate and the influence of the Appliance Retirement Program on their decision.
ram was “extremely influential to your decision to dispose of this or these additional appliance(s).” [RECORD RESPONSE 0-10, 98 = Don’t know, 99 = REFUSED] [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE] Ref.: 5725 110 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Pr...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions from an evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks participants about changes in energy costs, knowledge, and negative consequences of appliance removal, as well as whether they would recommend the program to others.
contact: Appliance Number of Units Retired Date of Retirement Database Info Validation Database Info Validation Refrigerators: To be competed To be competed Stand-Alone Freezers: To be competed To be competed Dehumidifiers: To be competed...
AI summary The text provides a template for reporting the retirement of various appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room air conditioners, along with details about their replacement and usage patterns. It is part of an evaluation report for an appliance retirement program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Occasionally Never Time For a secondary refrigerator replaced: For a secondary refrigerator not replaced: Ref.: 5725 116 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report New Refrig...
AI summary This document contains forms and information related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including details about refrigerator and freezer replacements, energy consumption, and program evaluation.
2011 Evaluation Report 2.2 FREEZERS (IF APPLICABLE) Replacement Information (site contact declaration) Number of stand-alone freezers retired: Number replaced with a new freezer: Number replaced with a used freezer: Number not replaced at...
AI summary The text outlines forms and data collection procedures for appliance retirement programs, specifically focusing on freezers and dehumidifiers. It includes fields for replacement information, secondary freezer usage, and dehumidifier usage, indicating a structured evaluation process.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, likely assessing the performance or outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives during that period.
ogic Model ........................................ 2 Figure 2: Methodological Model .............................................................................................................. 3 Ref.: 5725 iii Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Replacement (ARep) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) found that the rebate structure was simplified from a sliding scale to a flat $200 rebate. The program allowed multi-unit residential building owners to replace old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR®-qualified units, with Gallery 1 acting as the preferred retailer offering additional rebates.
ators, a preferred retailer, Gallery 1, was selected through a request for proposal (RFP) process. This retailer offered customers an additional rebate to the one already provided through the program. The program collaborated with commissi...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program in 2011 achieved significant energy savings by replacing 531 refrigerators, 62 freezers, and 107 mini-fridges with ENERGY STAR units. The program generated 0.548 GWh of net energy savings, a notable increase from 2010. A special project at Dalhousie University and collaboration with partners contributed to these results.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Satisfaction The retailer partner contacted during an in-depth interview expressed a very high level of satisfaction with the overall program as well as with ENSC’s team and other p...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's ARep program highlights high satisfaction from a retailer partner, but notes a need for financing options to improve program implementation. The program achieved 0.548 GWh of net energy savings and 0.065 MW of demand savings at the generator in 2011.
Initial Gross NTGR Net Savings Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.362 GWh 0.74 0.268 GWh Evaluation Results 0.548 GWh 1.00 0.548 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.043 MW 0.74 0.032 MW Evaluation Results 0.065 M...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that the net evaluated savings from the Appliance Replacement Program more than doubled compared to the tracked savings. This is attributed to an upward revision of unitary savings values for refrigerators based on metering data from the ARET program and the NTGR of 1. The program, though discontinued in 2012, is noted to have worked well overall and recommendations are provided for potential future implementations.
programs in the overall executive summary of the 2011 demand-side management programs, the Evaluator has the following specific recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: ARep-R1. Consider offering financing: T...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving the 2011 demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia. It suggests offering financing to overcome barriers to appliance purchases and adding a field in the tracking sheet to ensure appliances meet ENERGY STAR qualifications, ensuring accurate savings calculations.
the addition of a field to validate the ENERGY STAR criterion and to identify the energy consumption of the appliance would ensure that savings are calculated correctly. Ref.: 5725 vi Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program Effi...
AI summary The Appliance Replacement Program, launched in 2011, aimed to replace old refrigerators in multi-unit residential buildings with ENERGY STAR®-qualified units. Incentives were initially based on a sliding scale but were later changed to a flat $200 rebate. The program also partnered with a retailer, transportation service, and recycler to facilitate the replacement and disposal of old appliances.
R refrigerators that was added to the program incentive. However, landlords could choose any retailer. The program also partnered with a transportation service and a recycler to retire old appliances. The ARep program was designed as a mar...
AI summary The ARep program aimed to replace older refrigerators in multi-residential buildings with ENERGY STAR appliances, targeting electricity and demand savings. It partnered with landlords and used sales representatives to generate leads. However, the program was not pursued in 2012 due to high costs per KWh.
m logic model below shows the causal links between program activities and the changes expected in the market. Figure 1: Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program Logic Model Ref.: 5725 2 Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program, including the analysis of program documentation and in-depth interviews with the program manager.
obtained from the following four sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation report; > program manual; > tracking sheet. 2.2.2 In-Depth Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff conducted one interview in September with the Program Mana...
AI summary The document outlines the data sources and interview processes used in evaluating the Appliance Replacement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes interviews with the Program Manager and a Retailer Partner, as well as on-site visits, to gather information on program justification, savings calculations, barriers, marketing strategies, and participation processes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November, two on-site visits were conducted at multi-unit residential buildings in which appliances had been replaced through the ARep program. In each multi...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses on-site visits conducted in November at multi-unit residential buildings where appliances were replaced through the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP). The visits aimed to validate the installation and characteristics of new refrigerators and were conducted by a subcontractor of Econoler.
fectiveness of the program design and delivery.” The process evaluation relied upon in-depth interviews conducted with the PM and with the program partner (retailer). 3.2 PROGRAM MANUAL CONTENT The ARep program features a manual that conta...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) includes a process evaluation based on interviews with the Program Manager and a program partner. The program manual contains essential components such as program description, objectives, incentives, eligibility criteria, and marketing plans, tailored to internal use by staff and evaluators.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Program Manual Content ARep Program Manual Evaluation plan Program theory Logic model Program process flow chart Partner or participant process flow chart Program forms Information...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Appliance Retirement Program (AREP) notes that the program manual lacks detailed criteria for rebate determination and does not provide a 'base case' for calculating assumed gross savings. Econoler recommends improving the documentation to enhance transparency and validation of program assumptions.
eet also contains a field that refers to the age of the unit retired. This field is essential to validate that the refrigerators replaced under the program are older than ten years, which is one of Ref.: 5725 8 Efficient Products – Applian...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the Appliance Replacement Program's tracking sheet, noting that while it meets basic monitoring needs, it lacks energy savings monitoring. The report recommends adding a field for average unitary savings values to improve evaluation accuracy.
the average unitary savings value estimated for each refrigerator replacement and compute the gross savings by multiplying this average value by the quantity of refrigerators replaced. > Include a field to validate the ENERGY STAR qualific...
AI summary Econoler recommends adding a field to validate ENERGY STAR qualification in the ARep program's tracking sheet to ensure compliance. While most appliances meet the criteria, a small percentage did not, though adjustments to savings calculations were not necessary.
ng program design and implementation. The following are comments and recommendations that would have a positive impact on the design and delivery of the program, should it be re-offered in the future: > Consider offering financing: ENSC ne...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving the design and delivery of a program, including offering financing to landlords and developing an evaluation plan in parallel with program development to ensure rigorous assessment and data collection.
mportant to the PM are covered. The two most important components of the plan are the evaluation methodology as well as the pre- and post-data required to apply the selected methodology. > Focus on a resource acquisition objective: Having...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program emphasizes the importance of the evaluation methodology and data collection. The program is focused on resource acquisition rather than market transformation due to its rebate structure and limited advertising. There were challenges with the transition from Nova Scotia Power to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, causing confusion and delays.
sport and recycling contractors) is very high. However, the retailer declared that there was confusion when the program changed hands from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC and that this change caused delays. According to the retailer, there was a...
AI summary The retailer expressed concerns about confusion caused by the transition of the appliance replacement program from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC, which led to delays. There was also confusion between the Appliance Replacement Program and the Retail Markdown Program. The retailer suggested offering financing to improve program performance and noted limited marketing support for the program.
ration 2011 Evaluation Report 4 IMPACT EVALUATION 4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the ARep program for 2011. Both energy and demand savings were...
AI summary The 2011 impact evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) assessed energy and demand savings. Econoler reviewed unitary savings and conducted on-site visits to validate installations and refrigerator characteristics. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) was assumed to be 1 due to insufficient participant numbers for a telephone survey.
e visits were conducted for the 2011 evaluation of the program. The sampling was based on program tracking sheets that contained the list of participants and information about the appliances replaced. As only two on-site visits were planne...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) outlines on-site visits conducted to assess refrigerator replacements. The report uses an average unitary savings value of 437 kWh per refrigerator, based on the 2010 evaluation.
g sheet. The gross savings calculation is made by using an average unitary savings value for each refrigerator replaced. ENSC estimates this value at 437 kWh, based on the 2010 ARep evaluation report. In 2011, an important project was held...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for refrigerator replacements under the Appliance Replacement Program. ENSC uses an average unitary savings value of 437 kWh, based on a 2010 evaluation report. Adjustments were made using a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.79 derived from the California Appliance Retirement Program.
e used in the 1 The Cadmus Group, Residential Retrofit – High Impact Measure Evaluation Report, Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission – Energy Division, February 8, 2010, p.141. Ref.: 5725 13 Efficient Products – Applianc...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the energy consumption of refrigerators under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Replacement Program. It compares the energy use of old and new ENERGY STAR-qualified refrigerators, using metering data to determine average consumption values and savings.
cture year. Based on the manufacture year of the old refrigerators in the ARep program tracking sheet, Econoler calculated an average annual consumption value of 58.7 kWh/cu ft for old refrigerators. Table 3: Metering Data for Retired Refr...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of average annual energy consumption for old refrigerators in the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) based on data from the ARep program tracking sheet. Econoler calculated an average annual consumption of 986 kWh for old refrigerators, which is used for unitary savings calculations in the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For the new refrigerators, Econoler used the same approach as the 2010 evaluation. Using the EnerGuide rating for the top 17 refrigerators installed under the program, it was found...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses the energy consumption of new and old refrigerators under the program. New refrigerators had an average annual consumption of 363 kWh, adjusted to 287 kWh using a lab-to-on-site factor. Old refrigerators used metering data adjusted by a factor of 1.12 to account for household occupancy differences.
he average number of people per participating household2. This adjustment is based on the occupant adjustment factor proposed in the New York protocol metering3 on which was based the metering study. Table 4: Unitary Savings Calculation fo...
AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of unitary savings values for refrigerator replacements in the Appliance Replacement Program, based on the New York protocol metering study. The unitary savings value was updated from 437 kWh to 817 kWh, though it remains below estimates from other studies such as Efficiency Maine’s.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 retired refrigerators consumed 1,824 kWh per year. The 2010 evaluation of the California ARP found 5 an average consumption value of 1,303 kWh across three utilities. At first gla...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation compares energy consumption data from retired refrigerators and freezers. It notes that older refrigerators consumed more energy and explains differences in consumption estimates between the Evaluator and previous studies. The report also provides data on freezer energy use based on metering data from the Appliance Recycling Facility.
usie University, Econoler calculated an average annual consumption value of 64.4 kWh/cu ft for old freezers. Table 5: Metering Data for Retired Freezers from the Appliance Recycling Facility Average Annual Consumption Proportion in the ARe...
AI summary Econoler calculated the average annual consumption of old freezers based on data from the Appliance Recycling Facility, finding an average of 64.4 kWh/cu ft. This data was used to evaluate the Low Income Appliance Replacement Program and assess energy efficiency improvements.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report This average annual consumption of 818 kWh will be used for the unitary savings calculation of freezers replaced through the program. For the new freezers, Econoler used the same ap...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of unitary savings for freezers replaced through the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation program. It uses average annual consumption values for both old and new freezers, applying adjustment factors to calculate the final unitary savings of 637 kWh per freezer.
per Freezer 637 kWh As a result, Econoler applied the average unitary savings value of 637 kWh to the freezers replaced through the program. Mini-Fridges A total of 86 mini-fridges were replaced through the special project in Dalhousie Uni...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for appliance replacements, specifically freezers and mini-fridges, using the ENERGY STAR federal standard. Econoler applied average unitary savings values to estimate energy consumption differences between old and new units, with a focus on efficiency improvements.
l # GMR05BLPWWC). This difference meets the ENERGY STAR criterion for compact refrigerators which requires to be at least 20 percent more energy efficient than the minimum federal government standard. The lab-to-on-site factor of 0.79, use...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency improvements in mini-fridges, calculating unitary savings based on consumption values and applying an installation rate of 100% for the ARep program. The calculations involve adjustments for lab-to-on-site factors and occupant behavior.
rs. The on-site visits revealed that all new refrigerators had been installed in accordance with the data found in the tracking sheet. Hence, the installation rate for the ARep program is 100 percent. The on-site visits were also used to v...
AI summary The on-site visits confirmed 100% installation rate for the ARep program, but found that some refrigerators did not meet ENERGY STAR qualifications. ENSC explained this was an isolated case due to a language barrier, and adjusted savings calculations accordingly. The energy-to-demand ratio for the program was calculated as 8.49 GWh/MW.
recommends to collect the participants’ rate codes in order to establish the line loss factor in a more precise way. Table 8: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings Refrigerator Freezer Mini-Fridge Replacement Replacement Rep...
AI summary The text discusses the collection of participants' rate codes to more accurately establish the line loss factor. It includes a table evaluating energy and demand savings from appliance replacements, including refrigerators, freezers, and mini-fridges, with line loss factors applied to calculate gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements suc...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures in residential settings, specifically the impact of replacing old refrigerators with more efficient units in the ARep program. It notes that while this may increase heating load in winter and decrease cooling load in summer, the overall effect is considered insignificant due to various factors analyzed by Econoler.
s that affect the interactive effects, Econoler concludes that the interactive effects for the ARep program are insignificant. Indeed, Econoler took into account the following factors in its analysis: > Within the framework of this evaluat...
AI summary The analysis concludes that interactive effects from the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) are insignificant due to factors such as low electricity use for heating, air conditioning prevalence, and refrigerator placement. The Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) is calculated using a self-report method involving telephone surveys to assess program distortions like free-ridership.
Generator Generator Total Gross Savings 0.497 0.548 0.059 0.065 Interactive Effects Factor 0% 0% 0% 0% NTGR 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Net Savings 0.497 0.548 0.059 0.065 Ref.: 5725 21 Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program Effi...
AI summary The document compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Appliance Replacement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It shows higher energy and demand savings from the evaluation compared to tracked data, with the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) at 1.00 for the evaluation results.
Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.043 MW 0.74 0.032 MW Evaluation Results 0.065 MW 1.00 0.065 MW The net evaluated savings more than doubled with relation to the net evaluated savings tracked by ENSC. This result is mainly due to...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program (ARET) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) showed that net evaluated savings more than doubled compared to tracked savings, primarily due to an updated unitary savings value for refrigerators. The evaluation also considered installation rates, interactive effects, and the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), concluding that free-ridership and spillover effects were negligible due to low participation.
Program 1. Document the major characteristic of the program: The program manual Manual indicates that the rebates offered depend on the age, efficiency and size of the Content appliance being retired. However, it does not detail the criter...
AI summary The program manual lacks detailed criteria for determining appliance rebate amounts and does not provide a base case for calculating gross savings. Additionally, it does not document the parameters used to estimate program objectives, such as distortion and interactive effects, which are essential for validation and updating purposes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, likely assessing the performance or outcomes of energy efficiency programs or initiatives undertaken during that period.
Program 5. Complete the program manual to keep track of changes and standardize Manual the content: The program manual is well written but important information is Content missing to serve as “program memory” in case of modifications or st...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving the program manual and tracking sheet for the Appliance Replacement Program. It suggests standardizing the manual, updating it with recent forms, and adding a field to validate ENERGY STAR qualifications in the tracking sheet to ensure compliance and accuracy.
ied. For one particular case, the nonconformity could be explained through an on-site visit. It was due to a misunderstanding from the participant, because of a language barrier. ENSC had already addressed this issue and had not claimed th...
AI summary The text discusses a case where a misunderstanding due to a language barrier led to a nonconformity in an appliance replacement program. ENSC addressed the issue and proceeded with the rebate to satisfy the customer. Econoler agreed but recommended adding a field to validate the ENERGY STAR criterion. Additionally, Econoler suggests including a field for the annual energy use of new appliances to aid in evaluation.
Such information would allow the Evaluator to register all the energy consumption of the new appliances installed, which is used in the unitary savings calculations. Ref.: 5725 24 Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program Efficien...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of registering energy consumption data from new appliances installed under the Appliance Replacement Program, which is used for unitary savings calculations in the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation evaluation report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011. It provides an overview of the organization's activities and performance during that year.
penetration and market share. For this particular program, Econoler recommends that the market transformation objective not be pursued. The program is already more oriented towards an acquisition objective considering the significant rebat...
AI summary Econoler recommends that the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) focus on acquisition rather than market transformation due to significant rebates and limited advertising. They also suggest collecting participants' rate codes to better estimate line loss factors for future program evaluations.
rocess Evaluation Program Name: Appliance Replacement Program Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: List of questions (Q) and comments (C) discussed Source: Program Manual Page 24 Q: Are you tracking the participants who recei...
AI summary The document outlines a telephone interview with the Program Manager of the Appliance Replacement Program, discussing program implementation, participant tracking, delivery agents, partnership roles, barriers related to landlord-tenant relationships and upfront capital, and performance indicators. It also references an evaluation report and questions about energy consumption data.
very easy) Q: Finally, do you have any subject or issue you would like the evaluator to investigate with the program partner (delivery agent)? Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. Ref.: 5725 28 Efficient Products – Appliance...
AI summary The document is an interview guide for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Replacement Program, asking program partners about their role, experience, and perception of the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC.
re it changed status and name from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, how was this transition perceived in the market? Not applicable Unnoticed Some confusion A lot of confusion Don’t know Ref.: 5725 29 Efficient Products – Appliance Replacemen...
AI summary The document includes survey questions about the transition of the program from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, the impact on relationships with the Program Administrator, participant complaints, and the ease of participation in the Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program.
m Q9 – We would like your opinion on the number of parties involved in this program (delivery agent, recycler, transport contractor). Are they? Too few Adequate Too many No opinion Q9a- If you answered Too Few or Too Many, please comment:...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about the Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program, focusing on the number of program participants, relationships between partners, lead sources, market confusion, and program name changes. Respondents are asked to evaluate their experience and provide feedback on program modifications.
n the change of program name)? Easy to adjust to the way you work Requires minor changes to the way you work Requires major changes to the way you work No opinion Not Applicable Ref.: 5725 33 Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Prog...
AI summary The document contains survey questions and an on-site visit protocol from an evaluation report of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program from 2011. It includes questions about program name changes, barriers to implementation, and complaints from program partners, along with a protocol for site visits.
SIT PROTOCOL 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Date of visit: Order ID: Site contact name: Telephone: Address: 2 APPLIANCE INFORMATION Validate the database information with the site contact: Appliance Total Number of Units Replaced Date of Replacemen...
AI summary This document outlines a protocol for verifying appliance replacement information as part of an appliance replacement program administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for recording appliance details such as brand, model, energy consumption, and ENERGY STAR ratings.
(site contact declaration) Energy consumption [kWh/year]: ENERGY STAR rating: Unit #4: To be competed New or used unit?: Brand: Model number: Capacity [in cubic feet]: Smaller, bigger or same size as the retired unit: (site contact declara...
AI summary The document presents a final evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program in 2011, assessing its impact and process.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an overview of the corporation's activities and performance.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which likely outlines the performance and impact of energy efficiency initiatives undertaken by the organization during that period.
T PROTOCOL .................................................................................. 122 APPENDIX VIII - ALGORITHM FOR FREE-RIDERSHIP CALCULATION ...................................... 129 Ref.: 5725 iii Efficient Products – Retai...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It provides an analysis of the program's performance and outcomes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an analysis of the organization's activities and outcomes related to energy efficiency initiatives.
........................................................................... 4 Figure 3: Light Output Equivalency for Incandescent Lamps to CFLs .................................................. 37 Ref.: 5725 v Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in Nova Scotia assessed its impact through interviews, on-site visits, and surveys. The program, known as 'Plug Into Savings,' collaborated with 12 retail chains to offer discounts on energy-efficient products such as LED lamps, CFLs, and thermostats during spring and fall markdown periods.
E Tier 3 refrigerators; and > CEE Tier 3 clothes washers. The spring and fall retail markdown periods for the year 2011 ran from May 1 to June 30 and from October 1 to December 18, respectively. In 2011, the program also included an Air Mi...
AI summary The 2011 Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation aimed to promote energy-efficient products such as EEE Tier 3 refrigerators and CEE Tier 3 clothes washers. The program included initiatives like an Air Miles pilot and in-store events, with goals of achieving 15.52 GWh in energy savings and 1.56 MW in demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report KEY FINDINGS The 2011 evaluation of the RMP demonstrated that the program constitutes the right approach in a market transformation and resource acquisition perspective. The inciden...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) found that participant incidence increased slightly from 31% in 2010 to 37% in 2011. However, awareness of the program dropped, with fewer participants and non-participants recalling in-store promotions or discounts. Marketing materials were found to be disorganized, making it difficult for customers to identify discounted products.
y, the clients who did not know about the program, and even the ones who did, had difficulty identifying discounted products. These findings revealed an issue regarding the program marketing material. The DA contacted during an in-depth in...
AI summary The document highlights challenges with program marketing materials, including difficulty in identifying discounted products and the need for optimization. Retailers expressed concerns about last-minute changes to promotions and suggested a more customer-oriented approach. They also emphasized the positive impact of weekend events and preferred shorter discount periods.
he program in general and most of its aspects such as their relationship with the DA, the amounts of the discounts, discount processing as well as discount tracking and reporting. Residual Potential Survey results demonstrated that the ins...
AI summary The document discusses the program's aspects, including its relationship with the DA, discount processing, and tracking. It highlights residual potential for CFL installation despite high adoption rates and outlines the methodology used to evaluate program energy savings, including NTGR calculations for various products.
urvey. Another reason explaining the NTGR of 1 lies in the fact that these products are grouped into too large retail categories to allow retailers to estimate the program influence on their sales. Ref.: 5725 viii Efficient Products – Reta...
AI summary The evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) found that it generated significant energy and demand savings in 2011, but noted that the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) of 1 for some products was due to grouping into large retail categories, making it difficult for retailers to estimate program influence on sales.
e effects for lighting products allowed for a more precise evaluation of savings. Finally, for several products, Econoler revised upward the unitary savings value, as summarized in the table below. Ref.: 5725 ix Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary This section discusses unitary savings adjustments for various efficient products under the Retail Markdown Program in 2011, highlighting increased savings values for some items, particularly programmable thermostats and CEE Tier 3 refrigerators and clothes washers.
223 CEE Tier 3 Refrigerators 112.8 230 CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washers 242 469 RECOMMENDATIONS Econoler finds that the program works well overall and at a satisfactory level. In addition to general recommendations presented for all ENSC program...
AI summary Econoler evaluates the CEE Tier 3 Refrigerators and Clothes Washers program, finding it works well overall. Specific recommendations are provided to optimize the program's performance.
n 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) Retail Markdown Program (RMP) is both a resource acquisition and a market transformation program operating...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program (RMP) aims to promote the use of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in all available sockets through market transformation and resource acquisition. The program encourages customers to use specialty CFL bulbs and offers discounts on multipacks of ENERGY STAR®-qualified CFLs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 4: List of Discounts per Product $3 on ENERGY STAR Regular CFLs $4 on Power Bars with Integrated Timer (multipacks of 4 or more) $3 on ENERGY STAR Specialty CFLs $10 on Heavy...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) conducted the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011, offering discounts on energy-efficient products like CFLs and LED lamps. The program was delivered by Summerhill Group under the 'Plug Into Savings' brand, with in-market periods and weekend events in retail stores to promote energy efficiency.
” Moreover, weekend events were held in participating retail stores during the markdown periods. These activities aimed at providing information about the program and involved specialty CFL giveaways. A pilot project was added to the progr...
AI summary The RMP program in Nova Scotia included weekend events, a pilot with Air Miles rewards, and promotions through various channels. Retailers participated extensively, and the program aimed for significant energy and demand savings in 2011. The program emphasized education and customer engagement to promote energy efficiency.
ivery period. The program aimed at achieving net electricity savings of 15.52 GWh and demand savings of 1.56 MW for the year 2011. In 2010, the RMP program generated net energy savings of 10.36 GWh. Ref.: 5725 2 Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, aiming for 15.52 GWh of electricity savings and 1.56 MW of demand savings in 2011. It also references the program's logic model and methodology for the 2011 evaluation.
as the analysis of the program documentation. At that stage, key program information was reviewed. The information used to conduct this analysis was obtained primarily from the following four sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation repo...
AI summary The evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program involved reviewing program documentation, conducting interviews with the Program Manager, and engaging with the delivery agent and retailers. Key areas discussed included program justification, savings calculations, barriers, marketing strategies, and stakeholder involvement.
er things, to understand the delivery agent’s involvement in the program, their participation process in the program and their perception and satisfaction with the program. Interviews with Retailers In November, six in-depth interviews wer...
AI summary The document discusses interviews with retailers and on-site visits to evaluate the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) and its impact on product promotion and customer experience. It includes assessments of free-ridership, spillover effects, and retailer satisfaction with the program.
displays and the knowledge of products and the program by the employees. A copy of the “mystery shopper” visit protocol is included in Appendix VII. 2.2.5 Participant and Non-Participant Surveys The 2011 evaluation of the RMP involved tele...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the RMP involved telephone surveys with program participants and non-participants to assess awareness of ENERGY STAR and CFLs, CFL purchases, in-store promotion, and awareness of discounts. Surveys were conducted by CRA in Halifax using CATI, with participant surveys averaging 11.5 minutes and non-participant surveys averaging 8 minutes.
non-participant surveys were used to understand the following: > awareness of ENERGY STAR symbol and CFLs; > CFL purchases; > in-store promotion; > awareness of the discount; Ref.: 5725 6 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Effici...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report discusses the use of non-participant and participant surveys to assess awareness and usage of ENERGY STAR and CFLs, including motivations, barriers, and satisfaction. It also covers free-ridership and replacement rates, with sample sizes and sampling errors provided for the surveys conducted.
+9.8% Non-Participant Survey 260,023 70 +9.8% Overall Residential Survey 376,845 141 +6.9% Ref.: 5725 7 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3 PROCESS EVALUATION 3.1 OBJECTI...
AI summary The document discusses the process evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focusing on assessing the program's design and delivery. The evaluation involved interviews, surveys, and in-store visits. The RMP includes a program manual with internal components, though specifics are not fully detailed in the text.
al. Table 6: Program Manual Content Program Manual Content RMP Program Manual Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives Eligibility criteria Not Applica...
AI summary The document outlines the content of the RMP Program Manual, including sections like program description, incentives, eligibility criteria, and budget. Econoler has evaluated the manual and provided recommendations for improvement.
Econoler has analyzed the RMP manual. It contains relevant information that is useful for both the PM and the Evaluator. However, Econoler proposes the following recommendations to improve the tool: > Document the major characteristics of...
AI summary Econoler has reviewed the RMP manual and found it lacks documentation on key program characteristics, a base case for gross savings calculations, and parameters used to estimate program objectives. These gaps hinder validation and updating of the program's evaluation.
HEET Econoler reviewed the content of the tracking sheet for the RMP. In general, the tracking sheet is consistent but contains minimal information for program administration and evaluation purposes. The tracking sheet is filled in with da...
AI summary Econoler reviewed the RMP tracking sheet, noting its consistency but lack of detailed administrative and evaluation data. The tracking sheet monitors product sales and returns but lacks package and product-specific details, which are stored in a separate database. Econoler supports ENSC's plan to require DAs to upload data into their management system in 2012.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The tracking sheet also provides information on the retail pricing and the promotional pricing with the discount offered. However, the total discount amount given by ENSC to retaile...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses issues with the tracking sheet used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) to monitor program performance. The sheet lacks information on total discount amounts and does not calculate gross energy savings. Econoler recommends adding a table of unitary savings values and a formula to compute savings directly in the tracking sheet.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.4 PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION Following the analysis of all program elements, and with the most up-to-date information about the program background and tools, the Evaluator...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report concludes that the markdown approach used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation is adequate for promoting energy-efficient products. The program has evolved with updated product criteria and expanded offerings, such as LED lamps. However, Econoler suggests potential improvements to the program's design and implementation.
and therefore wants to develop its presence in the market, but changing names should be kept to a minimum. The program name should reflect as much as possible the nature of the program. > Analyze the market offer in order to adjust the dis...
AI summary The document discusses the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focusing on adjusting in-store discounts as market penetration increases. The Evaluator recommends monitoring the evolution of in-store offers to guide the Program Manager (PM) in reducing discounts as product categories achieve higher market penetration.
cipating retailers, etc.). The information pertaining to the RMP was available on the website only for the period of the markdown, which is a good practice to avoid confusion. 3.5.2 On-Site Visits In October and November 2011, a total of 1...
AI summary The Retail Markdown Program (RMP) was evaluated through mystery shopping visits to 10 stores in 2011. The instant discounts under the RMP were found to be poorly visible, with an average rating of 2.7 out of 5, leading to confusion for customers in identifying eligible products.
of 5 was awarded. Overall, the mystery shoppers noted that the discounts were not always clearly visible and that this created confusion when it came to identifying products eligible for the program. Most retailers rang up the discount to...
AI summary A review of a program's implementation found that discounts were not always clearly visible, leading to confusion for customers. Some retailers did not apply discounts correctly, and in-store staff lacked knowledge about eligible products. Promotional events increased product exposure, but some representatives were unhelpful, and free CFLs were not consistently provided.
ystery shoppers received one free CFL in four stores out of six. This was explained by the fact that one store was out of stock and the other did not give CFLs away on the day the visit was conducted. Most of the promotional tools proposed...
AI summary Mystery shoppers found that promotional materials for energy-efficient products were inconsistently displayed in stores, leading to difficulties in identifying discounts. Most promotional tools were used, but shelf talkers were absent. Promotional displays received an average rating of 3 out of 5.
faction in regard to the overall program and with respect to their relationship with participant retailers and ENSC’s team. Nevertheless, the DA’s main concern seems to be with the marketing strategy. According to the DA, the main barrier...
AI summary The DA is concerned with the marketing strategy of the RMP, noting that barriers include optimizing marketing tactics and managing product discounts close to in-market periods. Retailers have provided feedback on specific marketing materials. The program's limited two-month in-market periods create challenges, but ENSC plans a 10-month campaign in 2012 with varying promotional efforts.
not easily adaptable to each store. Finally, one retailer suggested rethinking the marketing for it to be more customer- oriented, meaning that it should be more “eye-catching,” yet still informative. The retailers were very satisfied with...
AI summary Retailers expressed satisfaction with the Retail Markdown Program's support and communication but suggested improvements in marketing, product selection, and communication consistency. They recommended adding more products and improving the marketing approach to be more customer-oriented.
ncy Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Opinion on Program Duration, Barriers and Recommendations All retailers interviewed prefer a two-month offer to a year-round offer. However, some retailers do believe that the markdown per...
AI summary Retailers generally support the program and suggest improvements like shorter markdown periods, weekend events, and more training for sales staff. Customers are highly familiar with the ENERGY STAR label, with 80% of participants and 61% of non-participants showing some familiarity.
what or very familiar with it. The level of familiarity among non-participants is significantly lower, with 61 percent saying they were somewhat or very familiar with the ENERGY STAR label or symbol. Table 7: Level of Familiarity with ENER...
AI summary The text discusses the level of familiarity with the ENERGY STAR label among participants and non-participants in 2010 and 2011, with significantly lower familiarity among non-participants. It also mentions a table comparing familiarity levels and references an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.2 Awareness of CFLs Similar to 2010 results, the majority of participants reported being very familiar with CFLs after being read a description (68% in 2011, compared to 63% in...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation shows that the majority of participants were very familiar with CFLs (68%), slightly higher than the 2010 result (63%). Non-participants also showed increased familiarity compared to 2010, though at a lower rate (57%).
liar Before 6 4 Description Don’t Know 3 2 Table 9: Level of Familiarity with CFLs (2008 to 2010) 2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants Participants Participants (weighted) Participants (weighted) Partic...
AI summary This table presents data on the level of familiarity with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) among participants from 2008 to 2010. The data shows a decline in the percentage of participants who were very familiar with CFLs over the three years.
8 1 9 7 Before Description Don’t 1 1 3 2 Know Ref.: 5725 18 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report In 2011, participants were asked about their familiarity with different type...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation found that while most participants and non-participants were familiar with spiral-shaped CFLs, awareness of other specialty CFL designs was significantly lower, particularly among non-participants.
bulbs but have a heavier base. Just over four in 10 non-participants (44%) were aware of this type of CFL. Thus, the familiarity with some types of specialty CFLs is rather low among the population. Table 10: Knowledge of CFLs (2011) To th...
AI summary The text discusses awareness of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) and their features among participants and non-participants in a program. It highlights that familiarity with certain specialty CFLs is low and provides statistics on program awareness, including in-store promotions and discounts offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC).
SC regarding the purchase and use of CFLs in retail stores in the province, while 36 percent of non-participants were aware that ENSC was offering a discount for the purchase of specific CFL packages. Results show a higher level of program...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program shows a decrease in program awareness among non-participants compared to 2010, likely due to methodological changes and issues with promotional displays and store organization, which made it harder for customers to identify discounted products.
28% 76% 69% 71% Promotion Aware of 10 9 9 16 14 15 81 86 84 Promotion Ref.: 5725 20 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.4 CFL Purchase Motivations and Barriers Particip...
AI summary The report discusses participants' motivations for purchasing CFLs during the markdown period, with energy savings being the primary reason, followed by replacing burned-out bulbs and saving on electric bills.
the markdown period, including to save on energy or electricity (48%), because they were replacing burned out bulbs (31%), to save on electric bills (10%) or because they wanted long-life bulbs (7%). Table 13: Customers’ Reasons for Purcha...
AI summary The text discusses customers' reasons for purchasing compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) during the markdown period, with the primary reasons being to save on energy or electricity, replace burned-out bulbs, and save on electric bills. A small percentage of customers cited utility recommendations or ENSC recommendations as a reason for purchase.
2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Participant Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants Participants (weighted) s Participants (weighted) Participants (weighted) Sample Size 60 64 124 70 58 128 70 61 131 To save 82% 63% 65% 73% 71% 69% 63% 7...
AI summary The text presents survey data from 2008 to 2010 regarding participant responses to energy-saving initiatives, including motivations such as saving energy, replacing bulbs, wanting long-life bulbs, saving money on bills, and environmental concerns. It includes percentages of participants indicating these motivations and some unspecified responses.
cified Good for 17 5 7 13 9 7 1 5 4 environment Liked light they 3 2 2 4 2 2 produce Utility 2 2 2 3 <1 recommended Needed specialty 2 bulbs Heard they were 2 2 safer Because of an 3 3 ad Recommended 3 1 Fit better in 1 <1 fixtures Don't k...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation assesses the program's effectiveness in promoting energy-efficient products through markdowns. The report includes survey data on consumer preferences and perceptions of efficient lighting products.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Non-participants were asked the reason for which they had not purchased any CFLs during the markdown periods. The top response was because non-participants did not feel they needed...
AI summary A 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation found that 58% of non-participants did not purchase CFLs during markdown periods because they did not feel they needed them, and 21% were waiting for existing bulbs to burn out.
Table 15: Non-Participant Barriers to Purchasing CFLs (2008 to 2011) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 64 51 60 48 Don't need them 34% 53% 73% 58% Waiting for bulbs to burn out 23 16 7 21 Too expensive 6 8 5 8 Not bright enough 6 2 2 Don’t l...
AI summary The table shows the percentage of non-participants who cited various barriers to purchasing CFLs from 2008 to 2011, with the most common reason being 'Don't need them' increasing over time.
Don’t know what they are 2 I’m old, stick with what I have 2 Paperwork is inconvenient 2 Unaware of multipacks 2 Not that interested in energy 2 efficiency Other 7 15 Don't know 9 2 3 2 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 23 Efficient Products –...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation indicates that most non-participants already use CFLs, with an average of 13.9 installed. Despite this, there is still high residual potential for CFL adoption, as households have an average of 36 sockets.
rticipants, it should be noted that the residual potential still remains high. Indeed, a socket study conducted in 2011 by ENSC indicated that households in Nova Scotia have an average of 36 sockets. Table 16: Non-Participant CFL Use and I...
AI summary The text discusses CFL usage and purchases by participants and non-participants in Nova Scotia, highlighting that participants purchased significantly more CFLs than non-participants, especially during program periods, suggesting that the program increased customer CFL purchases.
the same as non-participants (4.9 CFLs). As stated in the past, the difference in purchase habits between participants and non-participants suggests that the program increased customer CFL purchases. Furthermore, when analyzing the number...
AI summary The report evaluates the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by analyzing CFL purchases among participants and non-participants. It finds that participants purchased more CFLs than non-participants and that overall CFL purchases remained high in 2011. A socket study confirmed residual potential for CFL adoption.
roducts, Market Progress Report, Developed by KEMA, November 2005, pages 4-6 and 4-7. Original Source: KEMA. Phase 4 California Residential Lighting and Appliance Program Market Effects Study, 2002. Ref.: 5725 25 Efficient Products – Retai...
AI summary The text references a 2011 evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, citing a Market Progress Report developed by KEMA in 2005 and a 2002 study on the California Residential Lighting and Appliance Program.
Table 17: CFL Purchases (2008 to 2011) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Partici- Non- Total Partici- Non- Total Partici- Non- Total Partici- Non- Total pants Participants (weighted) pants Participants (weighted) pants Participants (weighted) pants Part...
AI summary Table 17 provides data on CFL purchases from 2008 to 2011, including sample sizes, average purchases, total purchases, and distribution of purchase quantities among participants and non-participants.
30 10 12 30 12 17 24 17 19 31 10 Ω 18 16 or more 43 17 20 37 19 20 21 10 13 23 13 17 CFL Purchases – Program Period Sample Size 57 70 127 70 71 141 70 58 128 70 65 135 Average 13.2 3.3 4.4 10.4 2.4 3.8 6.9 0.7 2.9 8.0 1.5 4.0 Total 751 233...
AI summary The text presents data on CFL purchases during and outside the program period, including sample sizes, averages, totals, and distribution across different purchase ranges. The data highlights the frequency of purchases and non-purchases, with notable percentages and numerical values provided for analysis.
0 2 9 2 4 CFL Purchases – Outside the Program Period Sample Size 59 70 129 70 71 141 70 70 140 70 65 135 Average 4.1 5.6 5.5 7.0 4.7 5.2 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.4 4.9 5.1 4 Monthly Average 0.46 0.62 .61 0.82 0.56 0.61 0.48 0.51 0.50 0.68 0.61 0.64 T...
AI summary The document presents data on CFL purchases outside the program period, including sample sizes, averages, and totals. It also references an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Out of the 562 CFLs purchased by surveyed participants during the program periods, 470 (84%) were qualifying CFLs and, therefore, counted as having been purchased through the progra...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 evaluation report indicates that 84% of 562 CFLs purchased by participants were qualifying ENERGY STAR CFLs. On average, participants purchased 6.7 qualifying CFLs during the program periods, with 57% of these CFLs being installed, 36% stored, 4% removed, and 3% not yet installed. Reasons for removal included brightness, fit, and mercury concerns.
the CFLs had been removed stated that the lamp was not bright enough (1 respondent), that the lamp did not fit properly in the fixture (1 respondent) or that the lamp contained mercury (1 respondent). Noteworthy is that the proportion of C...
AI summary The report discusses the installation and removal of CFLs under the Retail Markdown Program in 2011, noting a decrease in CFL installations over time. Some respondents reported issues such as insufficient brightness, improper fit, and mercury content. The data shows that 57% of CFLs were installed, 36% were in storage, and 4% were removed.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 20: Installation of CFLs Purchased during the Program Period (2008 to 2010) Plan to Year Participants Installed Storage Removed Install Average 9.0 4.1 0.2 1.1 2008 % of CFLs...
AI summary This report evaluates the installation of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) by participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's program from 2008 to 2010. The majority of CFLs replaced incandescent bulbs, with consistent results across the years.
alled by participants replaced incandescent bulbs (74%), while two in 10 replaced CFLs (20%) and six percent were installed in new fixtures. These results are generally consistent with past findings. Table 21: Distribution of Installed CFL...
AI summary The report discusses the distribution of installed CFLs among participants, showing that most replaced incandescent bulbs. It also highlights that participants primarily chose CFLs based on light output equivalency rather than wattage guidelines.
ey use the same wattage as the bulbs to be replaced (13%) or use the number on the fixture/lamp (11%). Thus, the majority of participants (70%) chose their CFLs based on the light output equivalency. Table 22: Selecting Wattage for CFLs 20...
AI summary The majority of participants (70%) selected CFLs based on light output equivalency rather than wattage. A smaller percentage used guidelines on equivalent wattage, the same wattage as the bulbs being replaced, or the number on the fixture/lamp.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.7 CFL Purchase Plans Participants and non-participants were asked how likely they would be to purchase CFLs in the next year. Seven in 10 participants (72%) and four in 10 non-p...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report indicates that 72% of participants and 40% of non-participants were extremely likely to purchase CFLs in the next year, showing an increase from 2010 results. However, 15% of the population remained extremely unlikely to purchase CFLs, indicating a segment of laggards.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an overview of the organization's activities and performance during that period.
Table 24: Likelihood of Purchasing CFLs in the Next Year (2008 to 2010) 2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants (weighted) Participants Participants (weighted) Participants Participants (weighted) Sample 5...
AI summary Table 24 presents data on the likelihood of purchasing Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) from 2008 to 2010, showing trends in consumer behavior over time with weighted percentages and sample sizes for each year.
2 1 1 5 3 0 'Extremely 5 8 7 3 12 8 2 7 5 Unlikely' Ref.: 5725 31 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Respondents who were unlikely to purchase CFLs in the next year (rated...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program found that respondents unlikely to purchase CFLs in the next year cited longer markdown periods and lower prices as potential motivators. Non-participants might have participated if markdown periods were extended.
tions for both participants and non-participants. These results are consistent with findings stating that, had the markdown periods been longer, non-participants might have been program participants. Table 25: Factors that Would Encourage...
AI summary The table presents factors that would encourage the purchase of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in 2011, showing that lower prices and the replacement of burned-out CFLs were the most significant motivators, while other factors had minimal influence.
8% Nothing 2 16% 15% Don't know 5% 4% Ref.: 5725 32 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The text provides a brief statistical summary and references an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, highlighting participation and response rates.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of their programs and activities.
Table 26: Factors that Would Encourage CFL Purchases (2008 to 2010) 2008 (#) 2009 (#) 2010 (#) Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants Participants Participants (unweighted) Participants (unweighted ) Participants (weigh...
AI summary Table 26 outlines factors that influenced the purchase of CFLs (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) between 2008 and 2010, highlighting factors such as discounts, energy savings, and product characteristics like brightness and lifespan.
1 1 savings If they lasted longer/didn't 3 3 1 1 break Have plenty 2 2 1 1 in storage If they had fewer health 2 2 concerns Don't know 1 1 1 3 4 3 2 5 Note: In order to lighten the load of the results reported from previous years, only res...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that participants and non-participants were highly satisfied with the CFLs installed in their homes, with only 2% and 6% respectively expressing dissatisfaction. Reasons for dissatisfaction included lack of awareness about discounted bulbs and dissatisfaction with the light quality.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 29: Satisfaction with CFLs (2008 to 2010) 2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants Participants Participants (weighted) Participants (weighted...
AI summary This table from the 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation presents participant satisfaction levels with CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) from 2008 to 2010, showing varying percentages of very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and dissatisfied participants across the years.
11 3 6 5 Not at all 2 2 2 1 Satisfied Ref.: 5725 35 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 IMPACT EVALUATION 4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact e...
AI summary This section outlines the impact evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011, focusing on determining energy and demand savings. The evaluation considers unitary savings per product, replacement ratios, and market effects. New products added in 2011 include LED lamps and motion sensors.
nducted a literature review to find studies that had analyzed the savings resulting from their installation. For CFLs, the participant survey was used to establish the replacement ratio of CFL to CFL. The participant survey as well as reta...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to estimate energy savings from the RMP, including the use of a participant survey and retailer interviews to determine free ridership and market spillover effects. Unitary savings values for products like CFLs are based on the OPA's 2010 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report.
d demand savings remain the same. In the case where the assumptions were modified from 2010 to 2011, it is noted in the unitary savings review for the product. 4.2.1 Regular and Specialty CFLs ENSC uses the same unitary savings value of 41...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings assumptions for Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) used in residential programs, including the unitary savings value of 41 kWh and the calculation of displaced wattage based on light output equivalency between CFLs and incandescent lamps.
in the figure below. Figure 3: Light Output Equivalency for Incandescent Lamps to CFLs7 7 ENERGY STAR, “ENERGY STAR Qualified Light Bulbs – 2006 Partner Resource Guide.” Ref.: 5725 37 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency...
AI summary The analysis of the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Econoler found that the average power of CFLs sold was 14.4 watts, replacing incandescent lamps with an average power of 64.9 watts, resulting in a typical wattage difference of 50.5 watts. The majority of participants selected CFLs based on light output equivalency, and daily usage was revised to 2.4 hours based on metering studies.
in the table below. Table 30: Daily Usage of CFLs from Metering Studies Hours of Use Sampling Source Econoler, Hydro-Québec, Indoor: 2.65 h/day Outdoor: 3.6 h/day 200 sites 20108 Indoor: 2.28 h/day Outdoor: 3.1 h/day 752 loggers KEMA, Cali...
AI summary The document presents data on the daily usage of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) from metering studies conducted in Quebec and other regions, providing insights into indoor and outdoor usage patterns. These findings were used by Econoler in their evaluation of efficiency programs for Hydro-Québec.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report In 2011, ENSC conducted a socket study with 1,004 respondents. This study investigated CFL installations, indicating that 94 percent of CFLs were installed inside houses while the r...
AI summary In 2011, ENSC conducted a socket study showing that 94% of CFLs were installed indoors, with an estimated daily usage of 2.7 hours. Econoler recommended using metering data over self-reported estimates, leading to an updated unitary savings value of 49.8 kWh for CFLs in the RMP. The study also noted that replacement of CFLs may not generate additional savings.
arket, it is likely that many CFLs will be replacing other CFLs. Such replacement affects a portion of the market that is already transformed and does not generate savings attributable to the program. A replacement ratio was measured throu...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the replacement ratio of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in the Retail Markdown Program, noting that 20% of CFLs purchased replaced other CFLs, which affects gross savings calculations. The report explains that the replacement ratio applies only to regular CFLs due to differences in market timing and survey targeting.
s can only be applied to regular CFLs. Specialty CFLs have particularities that prevent them from being considered as regular CFLs, such as higher prices and a lower penetration rate. In-Service Rate For various reasons, it is possible for...
AI summary The document discusses the in-service rate of regular CFLs and the evaluation of LED lamps under the RMP. It notes that 96% of regular CFLs remain in service, and the savings value for LED lamps is based on assumptions due to lack of specific data.
ing the manufacturers’ specifications. To do so, Econoler consulted the website of participating retailers to investigate on the replacement scenario suggested for each LED model sold through the RMP. The analysis revealed that the average...
AI summary Econoler analyzed the RMP to determine the energy savings of LED lamps replacing CFLs. The analysis found that LEDs displaced 42.3 watts of equivalent wattage and calculated an annual savings of 41.7 kWh per unit based on average usage and wattage data.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Indoor Motion Sensors Indoor motion sensors were added to the RMP in 2011. In the tracking sheet, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 63.95 kWh based on the 2010 OPA report....
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) added indoor and outdoor motion sensors to the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011. The unitary savings values for these sensors were based on assumptions from the 2010 OPA report, including operating time reductions and lamp wattages.
verage Lamp Wattage 242.6 W Old Operating Time 4.75 h/day New Operating Time – with Sensor 2.95 h/day Annual Savings 159.38 kWh Ref.: 5725 42 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation R...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from outdoor motion sensors and power bars with integrated timers. It provides calculations based on assumptions about lamp wattage and operating time, and recommends continuing to use the unitary savings value of 159.38 kWh per year for outdoor motion sensors.
r help reduce standby power. Various groups of electronic devices can be plugged into a power bar with integrated timer and a time frame can be set to shut them down completely when they are not used. In the tracking sheet, an average unit...
AI summary The text discusses power bars with integrated timers that reduce standby power consumption by shutting down devices when not in use. It outlines the assumptions used to calculate unitary savings of 53 kWh per year, based on an OPA report and data from Econoler.
r year in its evaluation for all power bars purchased through the RMP. 13 Representative bulb mix: (85% × 2 × 150 W incandescent) + (10% × 2 × 90 W halogen) + (5% × 2 × 26 W CFL) = 275.6 W. Ref.: 5725 43 Efficient Products – Retail Markdow...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from heavy duty timers used in pool pumps, based on the OPA report. It references the reduction in operating time from 10 to 6 hours per day, supported by sources such as the U.S. Department of Energy and the White River Valley Electric Cooperative.
://www.energysavers.gov/your_home/water_heating/index.cfm/mytopic=13290 > The White River Valley Electric Cooperative: https://wrve.opower.com/ei/app/tip/tip122_reduce_pool_pump_run-time As the assumptions used in the calculations performe...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses energy savings from programmable thermostats and uses a unitary savings value of 63.15 kWh per year, derived from the OPA report. The savings are based on a 1% reduction for every degree setback from a standard electronic thermostat.
es, they had recently been installed. This means that additional savings can be applied to the accuracy of having an electronic thermostat instead of a bimetallic thermostat that uses on/off controls. Therefore, Econoler reviewed another s...
AI summary Econoler reviewed a study on Hydro-Québec’s Residential Electronic Thermostats in its New Construction program to adjust the unitary savings value for programmable thermostats, considering the energy savings from thermostat accuracy and temperature setback.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 36: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec’s Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Calculation Parameters Duplex / Triplex / Single-Detached Apartment Townhouse Gross Energy Savings for Electronic Th...
AI summary This table from the 2011 Evaluation Report provides data on energy savings from electronic thermostats and programmable thermostats in different housing types, including savings per housing unit and per thermostat.
ermostats per housing 4.33 1.66 1.91 Savings per thermostat [kWh] 100 201 118 For the calculation of savings generated by the electronic thermostat accuracy, the percentages of savings were based on research supervised by Hydro-Québec’s la...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from electronic thermostats, referencing research by Hydro-Québec’s LTE laboratory. It compares bimetallic and electronic thermostats, using billing analysis and environmental chamber tests. Econoler suggests using Hydro-Québec’s findings instead of ENSC’s theoretical value.
bec – Laboratoire des technologies de l’énergie (LTE), “Sommaire exécutif de rapports publiés par Hydro- Québec concernant les économies d’énergie dues aux thermostats électroniques,” October 2004. Ref.: 5725 46 Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary Econoler suggests adding savings from bimetallic thermostats to temperature setback savings for programmable thermostats sold through the RMP, based on field data from the MURR program and housing type proportions in Nova Scotia's residential market.
tors sold through the program. This value is based on the OPA report, using an annual energy consumption of 564.01 kWh for a standard refrigerator and 451.21 kWh for an ENERGY STAR refrigerator. At the beginning of 2011, the target for thi...
AI summary The Retail Markdown Program (RMP) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) adjusted unitary savings values for refrigerators based on CEE Tier 3 ENERGY STAR models. The standard refrigerator's annual consumption was 564 kWh, while the new model's consumption was 334 kWh, resulting in a unitary savings of 230 kWh.
ntial Refrigerators Qualifying Product List, http://www.cee.1.org, December 15, 2011. 19 CSA-C360-03, Energy Performance, Water Consumption, and Capacity of Household Clothes Washers, January 2005. Ref.: 5725 48 Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from CEE Tier 3 clothes washers under the Retail Markdown Program, noting a significant increase in unitary savings due to updated program targets and the energy efficiency of the washers sold.
1050. This value was provided by ENSC and corresponds to the line loss factor for residential customers. At the generator, the gross energy and demand savings correspond to 19.752 GWh and 1.987 MW. Ref.: 5725 50 Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary The text provides a value for the line loss factor for residential customers, provided by ENSC, and mentions gross energy and demand savings at the generator level. It also references an evaluation report related to the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which outlines the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs implemented during that year.
Table 40: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings Power Indoor Outdoor Heavy Prog. Tier 3 Tier 3 Regular Specialty LED Dimmer Bars Product Category Motion Motion Duty Thermo- Refrige- Clothes CFLs CFLs Lamps Switches with Sens...
AI summary The table presents evaluation results for energy and demand savings from various campaigns and initiatives, including spring and fall markdown campaigns, in-store weekend events, and the Air Miles pilot project. It includes data on the number of units distributed and metrics such as replacement ratio and in-service rate.
placement ratio 80% - - - - - - - - - - In-service rate 96% - - - - - - - - - - Total number of units generating 168,578 66,347 1,705 7,736 207 19 203 4,650 7,662 1,218 4,525 savings Unitary Savings (kWh) 49.8 49.8 41.7 23.65 63.95 159.38...
AI summary The text presents a table with metrics related to energy savings, including placement ratios, in-service rates, total number of units generating savings, unitary savings, total gross energy savings at meter and generator, line loss factors, and total gross demand savings. These metrics are provided for multiple categories.
1.1050 Total Gross Demand Savings – 0.933 0.367 0.008 0.020 0.001 0.0003 0.001 0.198 0.190 0.031 0.236 at Generator (MW) Ref.: 5725 51 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4...
AI summary The document discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically the replacement of lighting products with CFLs, which impacts heating and cooling loads. An interactive effects factor of -18.5 percent is applied, based on a 1992 study for Hydro-Québec using DOE-221 software simulations.
ctive effects: low, moderate and high. The scenario with minimum interactive effects was selected for the calculation because it enabled the Evaluator to account for the evolution of homes since 1992. The following table presents the calcu...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of interactive effects for energy-saving measures such as CFLs, LED lamps, and indoor motion sensors in Nova Scotia. It outlines the distribution of residences based on heating and air conditioning usage and provides a weighted interactive effects factor of -18.5%.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Since outdoor motion sensors and heavy duty timers are installed outdoors, no interactive effects factor is calculated on these devices. For all other products, interactive effects...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the lack of interactive effects for outdoor motion sensors and heavy duty timers, and explains why interactive effects are not considered for ENERGY STAR refrigerators in Nova Scotia. It also outlines two approaches used to calculate the net-to-gross ratio for the RMP: a self-report approach via telephone surveys and an interview-based approach with retailers.
rket effects attributable to the program for three eligible products: CFLs, CEE Tier 3 ENERGY STAR refrigerators and CEE Tier 3 ENERGY STAR clothes washers. More specifically, retailers were asked to: > rate the influence of the program on...
AI summary The analysis measures the market effects of a program on the sale of CFLs, CEE Tier 3 ENERGY STAR refrigerators, and clothes washers. Retailers reported that 31% of CFL sales, 30% of refrigerator sales, and 32% of clothes washer sales during markdown periods were influenced by the program beyond just discounts.
ther. Table 44 presents the details of the calculation. Overall, the total net energy and demand savings amount to 12.490 GWh and 1.257 MW at the meter, and 13.802 GWh and 1.388 MW at the generator. Ref.: 5725 57 Efficient Products – Retai...
AI summary The document provides an evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, highlighting total net energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
fficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which provides an assessment of the organization's performance and initiatives in energy efficiency programs during that year.
oject, as well as from specialty CFLs given away during in-store events, were calculated together. However, for the Air Miles pilot project, a NTGR of 1 was used in the net savings calculation. Ref.: 5725 58 Efficient Products – Retail Mar...
AI summary The document compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) in 2011. The evaluation results show higher initial gross savings but lower net savings after accounting for NTGR (Net Total Gross Reduction) factors compared to the tracked savings.
ng sheet, ENSC used a line loss factor of 1.1188, as in the 2010 evaluations for residential programs. The line loss factor for the residential sector was updated this year to 1.1050. Ref.: 5725 60 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Prog...
AI summary The document discusses the line loss factor used by ENSC in residential program evaluations, noting a change from 1.1188 in 2010 to 1.1050 in the current year. It also references an evaluation report related to the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
ally adjusted based on the most recent evaluation results. 4. Refine and disseminate the marketing plans: Marketing plans, even if they are prepared in another department, should cover a whole year of activities and be included in the prog...
AI summary The text discusses the need to refine and disseminate marketing plans for the Retail Markdown Program, emphasizing the importance of including performance indicators and product specifications such as relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability in marketing strategies to effectively influence consumer behavior.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of their programs and initiatives related to energy efficiency.
Program 5. Complete the program manual to keep track of changes and standardize Manual the content: The program manual is well written but important information is Content missing to serve as “program memory” in case of modifications or st...
AI summary The text outlines recommendations for improving the program manual and tracking sheet used by ENSC. It suggests standardizing the manual, adding unitary savings values to the tracking sheet, tracking package-to-unit conversions, and including technical product information for better evaluation.
ormation on products could be useful to estimate the unitary savings of products. For that reason, Econoler suggests including all the technical information provided by the retailers, such as lamp wattage and product descriptions, in the t...
AI summary Econoler recommends improving the tracking sheet by including detailed product information and using clearer field titles. They also emphasize the importance of developing an evaluation plan in parallel with program design to ensure rigorous evaluation and data collection.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011. It provides an overview of the organization's activities and performance during that year.
Program 11. Standardize the program name across all channels: To avoid confusion, Tracking Sheet and to ensure adequate evaluation and tracking, the program name should always be the same whether it is for administrative reasons for ENSC (...
AI summary The document discusses the need to standardize the program name for ENSC's energy efficiency initiative, analyze market offers to adjust product discounts, and consider exit surveys to evaluate program effectiveness. It highlights the importance of consistency in branding and the need for data-driven adjustments to ensure program success.
ces set by the Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE). However, gross savings will be lower since a dynamic baseline is used (the baseline will be higher). Ref.: 5725 63 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia C...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, noting that gross savings will be lower due to the use of a dynamic baseline which is higher than the baseline set by the Consortium for Energy Efficiency.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of their performance and outcomes related to energy efficiency initiatives.
keting for it to be more customer-oriented, meaning that it should be more “eye-catching,” yet still informative. 18. Limit the number of people involved in the communications: The retailers were very satisfied with program support and com...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations from retailers to improve the customer-oriented approach of a program, including making communications more eye-catching, limiting the number of people involved, adding more products to the promotion list, and continuing weekend events. ENSC is also noted to conduct a 10-month marketing campaign in 2012.
weekend events was mentioned as being very positive. It is to be noted that ENSC will conduct a 10-month campaign in 2012, which will include marketing pulse. Ref.: 5725 64 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary The document references a 10-month campaign by ENSC in 2012, which includes marketing pulse, and mentions a weekend event with positive outcomes. It also refers to an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Relationship 21. Offer more training and support to retailers: One retailer wishes to see more with Partners training offered to the salespeople. According to them, ENSC’s sales rep...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation highlights the need for more training and support for retailers, as well as increasing the number of retailer interviews to better assess the program's indirect market influence and quantify market effects.
re precise quantification of spillover through market effects and could increase the number of products targeted by the assessment of this distortion effect. Ref.: 5725 65 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary This section discusses the demographics of participants and non-participants in the Retail Markdown Program, noting that most own their homes. It refers to a 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
1 3 2 4 Other 0 1 1 0 Ref.: 5725 66 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the Retail Markdown Program for efficient products in 2011. It provides an analysis of the program's performance and outcomes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an analysis of the organization's performance and outcomes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 51: Number of Bedrooms – 2008 to 2010 2008 2009 2010 Total Non- Non- Total Non- Total Participants (Weighted Participants Participants Participants Participants (Weighted) Par...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation shows that participants in the program have a higher household income compared to non-participants, with 57% of participants earning $50,000 or more annually, compared to 48% of non-participants.
s have a higher household income than non-participants, with 57 percent of participants reporting an annual household income of $50,000 or more, compared with 48 percent of non- participants. Table 52: Annual Income – 2011 Participants Non...
AI summary The text discusses the income distribution of participants and non-participants in a program, showing that participants have a higher proportion of higher household incomes compared to non-participants, with 57% of participants earning $50,000 or more annually, compared to 48% of non-participants.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 53: Annual Income – 2008 to 2010 2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants (Weighted) Participants Participants (Weighted) Participants Partici...
AI summary This report provides an overview of the annual income distribution of participants and non-participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation programs from 2008 to 2010. It includes data on income brackets and the average number of full-time residents per household.
21 16 25 18 20 or more The average number of full time residents by household is 2.5 for participants and 2.4 for non- participants. Table 54: Number of Full Time Residents – 2011 Non- Total Participants participants (Weighted) Sample Size...
AI summary The text presents data on the average number of full-time residents per household for participants and non-participants in a program, with an average of 2.5 for participants and 2.4 for non-participants. The data comes from Table 54 in the 2011 Evaluation Report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 55: Number of Full Time Residents – 2008 to 2010 2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants participants (Weighted) Participants participants (Weighted) Part...
AI summary This report discusses the 2011 evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlighting data on full-time residents from 2008 to 2010. It notes that all participants and most non-participants were responsible for paying their electric bills, consistent with past study results.
82% 96% 94% 95% No 5 11 10 6 7 18 4 6 5 Ref.: 5725 70 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Participants and non-participants had similar age distributions. The majority of r...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation shows that participants and non-participants had similar age distributions, with the majority being at least 35 years of age. The data is presented in Table 58, which includes percentages and sample sizes for different age groups.
17 16 21 27 25 65 or 15 19 18 12 36 32 19 24 22 older Ref.: 5725 71 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Over one-half of participants have a college or university degree (5...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation shows that 56% of participants have a college or university degree, compared to 49% of non-participants. The report includes data on education levels across different groups.
5% 57% 69% 69% 61% 51% 54% Male 48 44 44 43 31 31 39 49 46 Ref.: 5725 72 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX III - INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Eva...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide for evaluating the Retail Markdown Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions and comments related to implementation contractors, program partners, and the status of recommendations from the 2010 evaluation report, including those concerning CFLs, Tier 3 appliances, and year-round programs.
rogram. What is the status of these recommendations? Q: On page V, We would like to know the status of the following recommendation: R1 R3 Page VI – Status on recommandations R6 Page VII R2 Ref.: 5725 73 Efficient Products – Retail Markdow...
AI summary The text discusses the status of recommendations (R1, R2, R3, R6) and questions about the Retail Markdown Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes queries regarding the logic model, training for retailers, program name changes, and the rationale behind the program's short duration.
ed them? Q: what was the main barrier for customers to acquire these products (when you designed the program)? Q: Do you perform a post-cost effectiveness test after each evaluation? And if not why? Q: was there an evaluation plan when thi...
AI summary This text contains a series of questions from an interview guide used in the evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions focus on program design, evaluation practices, marketing strategies, and the ease of working with a centralized database.
address: [email protected]. Thank you! Part I: General Questions Please indicate your company name: Q1 - How would you define your role(s) as an ENSC energy efficiency program partner? Q1a – How long have you had that role (specify mon...
AI summary The document includes general questions directed at ENSC energy efficiency program partners, focusing on their role, the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, their relationship with the Program Administrator, and any complaints received from program participants.
for such a score? Reason(s): Q3 – Did you receive any complaints from participants in the program? Yes What was the complaint about? No Don’t Know Refused Not applicable Ref.: 5725 77 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency...
AI summary The document presents a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It asks participants about their experience with the program, including complaints, satisfaction levels, and suggestions for improvement.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q8 – Last year, have you been interviewed by another evaluator about the same program? Yes No Not applicable Q8a – If you answered Yes to Q8, we would like your opinion on the frequ...
AI summary The document is part of an evaluation report for the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes survey questions about program evaluations, retailer involvement, relationships with retailers, and the program's name changes over time.
pant retailers? Q13- What is your opinion in regard to the program name that has changed many times since its first implementation (Power Down, Plug into Savings and now Retail Markdown Program)? Q14- What is your opinion in regard to prog...
AI summary The text contains a series of survey questions related to the Retail Markdown Program, including opinions on program name changes, modifications, data collection, and barriers to implementation. The questions are part of an evaluation report conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
ion report) and we hope that they will contribute to improving program performance. If we need to clarify some of your answers, we might call you back. Your name Date Phone number E-mail Ref.: 5725 81 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown P...
AI summary This document is an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the Retail Markdown Program, formerly known as the Power Down program. It outlines the process for contacting and interviewing corporate retailers as part of the 2011 evaluation report.
D IF NECESSARY] The program was formerly known as the “Power Down” program. Throughout the interview, I will refer to it as the “Retail Markdown” program. IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF RESPONDENT I1. According to our records, your compan...
AI summary The text discusses an interview process for evaluating the Retail Markdown Program, formerly known as the 'Power Down' program, conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia with the assistance of Econoler. The interview aims to gather information from a person knowledgeable about the program's product stocking and supply, specifically ENERGY STAR CFLs, refrigerators, and clothes washers.
kept strictly confidential and that we will not share the information you provide with any other party in a way that could identify your individual or corporate responses. Recording of the Interview Please note that the interview will be r...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for verifying product discounts under the Retail Markdown Program, specifically focusing on ENERGY STAR CFLs and other efficient products. It includes instructions for checking sales volumes and validating information with the interviewee.
STAR CFLs, ASK FOR ALL CFLs). A. According to our information, you sold ENERGY STAR CFLs DURING the Markdown promotion in May and June? Is this accurate? B. Do you think that your sales of ENERGY STAR CFLs from the Markdown period currentl...
AI summary This text outlines a series of questions aimed at determining the sales performance of ENERGY STAR CFLs during and outside of markdown periods, including the impact of discounts on sales volume and projections for 2011.
ut the same, lower or higher? Same [SKIP TO C2b] Lower Higher [SKIP TO C2b] Don’t know [SKIP TO C3] Refused [SKIP TO C3] Ref.: 5725 84 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report C...
AI summary The text is a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks respondents about the impact of discounts on ENERGY STAR CFL sales during specific promotion periods, including projections for future sales.
[SINCE THE SECOND MARKDOWN PERIOD IS NOT OVER YET, ASK THE RESPONDENT TO ANSWER BASED ON A PROJECTION] RECORD PERCENTAGE _% [IF DIFFERENT FROM C2a, ASK WHY] Ref.: 5725 85 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text is part of an evaluation report regarding the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It asks whether discounts on CFLs were provided during specific promotion periods and seeks details on the sources and values of these discounts.
program discounts, are there any other discounts provided on CFLs? Yes [GO TO C5a] No [GO TO C6] Don’t know [GO TO C6] Refused [GO TO C6] Ref.: 5725 86 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Ev...
AI summary The text asks whether there are other discounts on CFLs beyond program discounts and includes a form to collect information on who offers discounts and their values. It also asks about the influence of the Retail Markdown Program on various aspects of store operations related to CFLs.
If not, will they be higher or lower? Can you give me an estimate? [SINCE THE SECOND MARKDOWN PERIOD IS NOT OVER YET, ASK THE RESPONDENT TO ANSWER BASED ON A PROJECTION] C. Roughly, how many ENERGY STAR refrigerators do you think you will...
AI summary The document includes questions about the impact of a retail markdown program on the sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators during specific promotion periods in 2011. It asks respondents to estimate sales and the effect of discounts on sales volume.
the same without the discount, do you mean that the program had no influence on your sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators? Yes, the program had no influence on my sales [GO TO R3] No, the program did have an influence on my sales [GO BACK TO...
AI summary This text outlines a survey process regarding the impact of the Retail Markdown Program on the sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators, including questions about the influence of discounts and projections of sales without the discount.
Yes [GO TO R5a] No [GO TO R6] Don’t know [GO TO R6] Refused [GO TO R6] R5a. Who offers the discount(s) and what is the value of the discount(s)? Store $ Manufacturer1 (specify) $ Manufacturer2 (specify) $ Natural Resources Canada $ Other F...
AI summary This document includes a questionnaire regarding discount offerings and the influence of the Retail Markdown program on stores, specifically focusing on ENERGY STAR refrigerators. It also references an evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report R7. What percentage of your sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators outside of the two markdown periods do you attribute to the program (or think occurred because of the program)? [SINCE...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions directed at a respondent regarding the sales of ENERGY STAR refrigerators and clothes washers, particularly during markdown periods in 2011. It asks for the percentage of sales attributed to the program and estimates for future sales outside of these periods.
do you think you will sell in 2011 outside of the two Markdown periods or what percentage of your 2011 sales approximately will occur during the two Markdown periods? W2. During the May-June promotion, the Markdown program provided a disco...
AI summary The text is a series of questions posed to retailers about the impact of a Markdown program on the sales of ENERGY STAR clothes washers during specific periods in 2011, including the May-June promotion and the October-November period.
that your October-November sales of ENERGY STAR clothes washers will be about the same, lower or higher than they would have been without the discount offered? Same [SKIP TO W4] Lower Higher [SKIP TO W4] Don’t know [SKIP TO W4] Refused [SK...
AI summary The text is a survey questionnaire asking retailers about the impact of discounts on ENERGY STAR clothes washer sales during promotional periods, including the percentage of sales decline if discounts were not available and any additional discounts offered by other entities.
Provincial Government $ City/Town/Municipality $ Other $ Don’t know Refused W5. During the October-November promotion period currently in effect, besides the Markdown program discounts, are there any other discounts provided on ENERGY STAR...
AI summary The text asks respondents whether discounts other than those from the Markdown program are offered on ENERGY STAR clothes washers during the October-November promotion period and seeks information about the source and value of any additional discounts. It also inquires about the influence of the Retail Markdown program on store offerings of ENERGY STAR clothes washers.
Please answer using a scale where 0 means “Not at all influent” and where10 means” Very influent”. a. Your stores offer of ENERGY STAR clothes washers Scale: b. The knowledge of your salespersons with regard to Energy Star clothes washers...
AI summary The text presents a survey evaluating the impact of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program for ENERGY STAR clothes washers, including questions about sales, consumer knowledge, and program satisfaction.
eason(s): S10. On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is excellent), what is your satisfaction level in regard to the tracking and reporting of discounts? Scale: S10a If your answer to S10 was equal to or less than 8, would yo...
AI summary The text contains survey questions and responses related to the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks about participant satisfaction, barriers to program implementation, program duration, promotion timing, complaints, and suggestions for improvement.
the questions I have for you today. Do you have anything to add regarding the program or this interview? I thank you very much for your collaboration and the time you took to answer our questions. Ref.: 5725 99 Efficient Products – Retail...
AI summary This text outlines a survey conducted by Corporate Research Associates on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to gather customer feedback on energy-efficient lighting products. The survey includes introductory questions to identify a household head and ensure the respondent is 18 years or older.
efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. We are trying to get feedback from customers about energy- efficient lighting products and your perceptions about these products. Ref.: 5725 100 Efficient Products – Retai...
AI summary The text discusses a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to gather customer feedback on energy-efficient lighting products and perceptions about them. The survey includes questions about demographics, awareness of the ENERGY STAR label, and familiarity with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs).
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report AB. AWARENESS OF CFLS AB1. Some of my questions will be about energy-saving lighting, such as compact fluorescent [Pronounced “flor-ess-ent”] bulbs, also known as CFLs. CFLs or comp...
AI summary The document discusses awareness and knowledge of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) through a series of questions, including familiarity with CFLs and their physical characteristics, as well as annual purchase habits.
pretty much like regular light bulbs, but have a heavier base? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) AP. ANNUAL PURCHASE AP1. In 2011 so far, approximately how many total compact fluorescent light bulbs in total has your household pu...
AI summary The text includes a survey question about the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) in 2011 and instructions for recording the number of bulbs purchased by pack size. It also references an evaluation report related to an efficient products retail markdown program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
2011 Evaluation Report AP2T. Record Number of CFL Bulbs— January – day of interview 2011 Purchases by pack size January-Day of interview 2011: AP2a. Number of single CFL bulb packs AP2b. Number of two-pack CFLs AP2c. Number of three-pack C...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report collects data on the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) by pack size during January of the interview period. It includes prompts for recording the number of bulbs purchased in various pack sizes and instructions for calculating the total number of individual CFL bulbs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report MP. MARKDOWN PERIOD [MP SERIES] MP1. [ASK IF AP1>0 OR AP2T>0] From October 1st, 2011 to today, approximately how many compact fluorescent light bulbs did your household purchase? He...
AI summary The document contains a survey question from the 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking respondents about the number of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) they purchased from October 1st, 2011, to the date of the interview. The question includes instructions on how to count individual bulbs and handle cases where respondents are unsure of the exact number.
culate the total number of CFLs. if yes, go to MP2 series. MP2T. Record Number of CFL Bulbs— October 1st – day of interview 2011 Purchases by pack size October 1st -Day of interview 2011: MP2a. Number of single CFL bulb packs MP2b. Number...
AI summary The document provides a form to record the number of compact fluorescent light bulb (CFL) packs purchased by customers during a specific period. It includes fields for different pack sizes and instructs to calculate the total number of individual CFL bulbs from these purchases.
2011 Evaluation Report PROGRAMMING NOTE: CALCULATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL CFL BULBS PURCHASED FROM THE DIFFERENT PACK SIZES IN MP2a-MP2l AND INSERT THAT VALUE IN MP2T. ES2. [ASK IF MP1>0 or MP2T>0]: We know that some CFLs have the...
AI summary The document outlines a 2011 evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program, focusing on the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), including ENERGY STAR labeled bulbs, from various retail stores in October and November. It provides instructions for data collection and reporting.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report MP4. [ASK IF AP1>0 OR AP2T>0] Now, I’d like you to think about the purchase of CFLs that your household could have made in May or June 2011. Between May 1st to June 30th, approximat...
AI summary The document presents a survey question related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) by households in May and June 2011, focusing on the number of bulbs purchased and how they were packaged.
and that we would calculate the total number of CFLs. if yes, go to MP5 series. MP5T. Record NUMBER OF CFL BULBS— MAY 1ST – JUNE 30TH 2011 Purchases by pack size May 1st – June 30th 2011: MP5a. Number of single CFL bulb packs MP5b. Number...
AI summary This document outlines a process for calculating the total number of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) purchased during May 1st to June 30th, 2011, based on different pack sizes. The data is collected in MP5a through MP5l, and the total is recorded in MP5T.
2011 Evaluation Report PROGRAMMING NOTE: CALCULATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL CFL BULBS PURCHASED FROM THE DIFFERENT PACK SIZES IN MP5a-MP5l AND INSERT THAT VALUE IN MP5T. ES3. [ASK IF MP4>0 or MP5T>0]: We know that some CFLs have the...
AI summary The text outlines a 2011 evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes instructions for calculating the total number of CFL bulbs purchased from different pack sizes and questions regarding ENERGY STAR™ CFL bulb purchases and store locations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report PARTICIPANT Bought ES CFLs during one of [PS2A-i = at least one QUOTA=70 the Markdown Period at one of yes] (OR) the selected stores (PS2 or [PS3A-J = at least one PS3) yes] NON Did...
AI summary The text outlines criteria for participants in an energy efficiency program based on their purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) during specific markdown periods. It includes conditions for participation and non-participation, with references to various program metrics and quotas.
since October 1st] IF (MP3T>0) AND (ES3=0,DK,REF): [since October 1st] IF (ES2=0,DK,REF) AND (ES3>0): [May or June] IF (ES2=0,DK,REF) AND (ES3=0,DK,REF): GO TO NP SERIES [READ IF BOTH MARKDOWN PERIODS (ES2>0) AND (ES3>0)] For the next ques...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) during a specific markdown period, including reasons for purchase and awareness of in-store promotions by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also references a free-ridership section, indicating an analysis of non-participation or lack of engagement in the program.
representatives providing information, and signs, or posters. 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FR. FREE-RIDERSHIP [ASK PARTICIPANT ONLY] P3. You bought CFLs in [Markdown Period]. During that period, Efficiency Nova Scotia offere...
AI summary This document contains survey questions related to consumer awareness and behavior regarding the purchase of energy-efficient light bulbs, specifically compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), under a discount program offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explores whether participants were aware of the discount and whether it influenced their purchasing decisions.
s? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that you “Definitely Would Not Have Bought the CFLs” and a 10 indicating that you “Definitely Would Have Bought the CFLs.” _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused FR4a. And if you h...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer purchasing behavior related to CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) under a discount program. Respondents are asked about how the discount influenced their purchase quantity and timing.
you “Definitely would have made the purchase at a later date.” _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused IF FR5 > 5, then ask: [DO NOT ASK IF FR5=98 OR 99] FR6. You indicated in your previous response that if the discount had NOT been offered...
AI summary The text presents a survey question regarding the influence of a discount on the purchase of CFLs and includes follow-up questions to determine the timing of the purchase without the discount. The survey is part of an evaluation report on an efficient products retail markdown program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
f 0 to 10, where 0 indicates the discount ‘had no influence at all on your purchase decision’ and 10 indicates that the discount was ‘extremely influential to your purchase decision. _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused iC. CFL IN-SERVICE...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process to determine how many Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) purchased with a discount were installed and how many remained unused, along with the reasons for non-installation.
OF BULBS _] IC7. When you purchase CFLs to replace regular incandescent light bulbs, on what do you usually rely to select the right wattage for your CFLs? [DO NOT READ, ONE RESPONSE] 1. (I use the guideline about equivalent wattage/power...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about consumer behavior regarding purchasing CFLs, including how they select the right wattage and their satisfaction with discounted CFLs purchased during a specific period. It also asks for reasons for dissatisfaction with the CFL bulbs.
ied 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) IC9. [IF IC8 = 4 OR 5] Why are you not satisfied with the CFL bulbs? [MULTIPLE MENTION, DON’T READ LIST] Light Quality 1. (Bulb is too bright) 2. (Bulb is not bright enough) 3. (Don’t like the overall qua...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to customer dissatisfaction with compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), including issues with light quality, function, performance, and physical limitations. It also includes questions for non-participants regarding their experience with purchasing CFLs.
1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) NP1b. [IF NP1a=2 or 98, OR 99,READ:] Why have you never purchased a compact fluorescent light bulb? [IF NP1a=1, READ:] Why have you not purchased any compact fluorescent light bulbs in the past y...
AI summary This text includes survey questions related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) and mentions a 2011 evaluation report on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Retail Markdown Program. It asks respondents about their reasons for not purchasing CFLs and whether they saw promotions related to the program.
use of compact fluorescent light bulbs in a number of retail stores in the province? This may have included such things as representatives providing information, and signs, or posters. 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) NP2b. Were...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the use of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) in retail stores and homes, and customer satisfaction with CFLs. It also references an evaluation report on Efficiency Nova Scotia's Retail Markdown Program.
2011 Evaluation Report NP5. [IF NP4 = 4 OR 5] Why are you not satisfied with the CFL bulbs? Probe: Anything else? [MULTIPLE MENTION, DON’T READ LIST] Light Quality 1. (Bulb is too bright) 2. (Bulb is not bright enough) 3. (Don’t like the o...
AI summary The text presents a 2011 evaluation report discussing customer dissatisfaction with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), including issues with light quality, performance, and physical limitations, as well as questions about future purchases of CFL bulbs.
likely” and 10 is “extremely likely.” [99=DON’T KNOW] FP2. [IF #FP1 <= 8] What would encourage you to buy CFL bulbs in the next year? [DO NOT READ RESPONSES; MULTIPLE RESPONSE] 1. (Lower price/make them less expensive) 2. (Make them availa...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about consumer behavior regarding the purchase of CFL bulbs and demographic information. It also references an evaluation report on an efficient products retail markdown program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
h of the following income categories best describes your total annual household income before taxes in 2010? Stop me when I reach the right category. [READ LIST; SELECT ONE RESPONSE] 1. Less than $15,000 2. $15,000 - $24,999 3. $25,000 - $...
AI summary The document contains a survey question regarding household income and an appendix detailing the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Retail Markdown Program, including discounts on energy-efficient products such as CFLs, thermostats, and refrigerators.
n Dimmer Switches (hard-wired); > Save $10 on Heavy Duty Outdoor Timers (plug-in); > Save $100 on Select Energy Star Refrigerators; > Save $100 on Select Energy Star Clothes Washers. Participating stores include 12 major chain retailers ac...
AI summary The document outlines a 2011 evaluation of the Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including mystery visits to assess instant discounts, product displays, and employee knowledge at 10 stores across Nova Scotia.
according to the dates mentioned (note that those events occur on the weekend). Equilibrium will have to evaluate certain aspects of those events as well, as indicated further in this guide. Ref.: 5725 123 Efficient Products – Retail Markd...
AI summary This document outlines a visit report and product purchase details for the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes a list of eligible energy-efficient products and a table for recording product purchase situations.
hase Situation In the table below, please check off the items which apply to your product. Product Purchase Situation Product to purchase: xxxxxxx Instant discount received directly at the counter upon presentation of the product to purcha...
AI summary This text outlines a product purchase situation and promotional display evaluation for the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in a 2011 evaluation report. It includes sections for checking purchase experiences and evaluating in-store promotional materials for lighting, controls, and appliances.
No No. Yes No No. Yes No No. Vertical Signs Coupons Apron Cards Others (specify) Comments: Observations In the store visited, the products eligible for discounts are easily identified. (On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means that the produc...
AI summary The document evaluates the in-store event for the Efficient Products – Retail Markdown Program, focusing on product visibility, promotional material exposure, and customer interaction with representatives. It includes rating scales and comments for assessment.
s Did the representative provide you with information on the products? Did the representative provide you with information on the discount offered? Did you receive a free CFL? Other Comments Ref.: 5725 127 Efficient Products – Retail Markd...
AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted to assess knowledge of a retail markdown program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions for mystery shoppers about program discounts, product differences, and ENERGY STAR logo awareness.
want to make sure - Before learning about the discount on IF 1. Yes: FR1 = 100% CFLs, you had already made the decision to purchase CFLs? IF 2 OR 9 : FR1 = 0% FR3. If the discount had NOT been offered, how likely would you have been to buy...
AI summary This text outlines a survey or questionnaire regarding customer purchasing behavior related to Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), specifically focusing on the impact of discounts offered by ENSC. It includes questions about likelihood of purchase with and without the discount, and the potential reduction in quantity purchased without the discount.
would you have purchased without the discount? Just as a reminder, you mentioned that FR4b you purchased [#ES] CFLs for which you received a discount. IF NUM. ANSWER TO PA2 Score: FR4b: (#ES-FR4b)/ #ES OTHERWISE: FR4a FR5. If the discount...
AI summary The text asks respondents to consider whether they would have purchased CFLs without a discount and at a later date, with a scale from 0 to 10 to gauge likelihood.
4899 www.econoler.com LED HOLIDAY LIGHTING EXCHANGE PROGRAM IMPACT EVALUATION 2007 TO 2011 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report February 20, 2012 LED Holiday Lighting Exchange Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2007 to 2...
AI summary This document is the final report of an impact evaluation of the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, covering the period from 2007 to 2011.
gs .................................................................................... 8 Table 7: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator (2007-2011) ....................... 9 Ref.: 5725 iii LED Holiday Lighting Excha...
AI summary The LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program, operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, has distributed 46,399 LED light sets from 2007 to 2011, resulting in 1.447 GWh of net energy savings. The program exchanges traditional incandescent lights for LED lights to reduce energy consumption.
GS The 2007-2011 evaluation of the program demonstrated good results. Since 2007, the program has handed out a total of 46,399 LED holiday light sets and has generated net energy savings of 1.447 GWh. To calculate the net savings of the pr...
AI summary The LHLE program, which distributed 46,399 LED holiday light sets from 2007 to 2011, achieved net energy savings of 1.447 GWh and demand savings of 3.618 MW. The evaluation assumed a net-to-gross ratio of 1, as free-ridership and spillover effects were not measured.
Tracked savings from ENSC 9.136 MW 9.136 MW 1.00 9.136 MW Evaluation results 4.512 MW 3.618 MW 1.00 3.618 MW Ref.: 5725 iv LED Holiday Lighting Exchange Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2007 to 2011 Impact Evaluation Report These...
AI summary The LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program, run by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), aimed to promote energy-efficient LED lights for holiday use. An evaluation found that net energy savings were 20.8% lower than tracked savings, and demand savings were 60.4% lower, partly due to adjustments in diversity and line loss factors.
ld annually from November to December across Nova Scotia, ENSC provided households with the opportunity to receive a free set of LED lights in exchange for two sets of traditional incandescent lights. The LHLE program has run every fall si...
AI summary The LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program, run annually since 2005, exchanges traditional incandescent lights for LED lights. The program, not a regular demand-side management (DSM) program, was approved by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) for the 2012 DSM Plan. This report evaluates electricity savings from 2007 to 2011 based on ENSC unitary savings calculations.
orporation 2007 to 2011 Impact Evaluation Report 2 IMPACT EVALUATION 2.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the LHLE program from 2007 to 2011. To do s...
AI summary The impact evaluation of the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program from 2007 to 2011 assesses gross and net energy and demand savings. Econoler reviewed ENSC's unitary savings calculations, using an average value of 35.2 kWh per set of LED lights exchanged and a unitary peak demand of 176 W.
itary Energy Savings Value (per exchange) 2 sets/exchange × 88 W × 200 h/year = 35.2 kWh/year Unitary Peak Demand (per exchange) 2 sets/exchange × 88 W = 176 W Through the LHLE program, ENSC offers one set of LED lights in exchange for two...
AI summary ENSC's LHLE program exchanges LED lights for incandescent ones, calculating energy savings based on the assumption that customers will replace both returned sets with new LED lights. This assumption is considered conservative, as some customers return multiple sets for one LED set and may not replace all returned sets.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2007 to 2011 Impact Evaluation Report Displaced Wattage Based on in-field observation, ENSC established proportions of old sets returned for three different types of incandescent light sets. The wattages...
AI summary The report evaluates the impact of replacing incandescent light sets with LED lights from 2007 to 2011. It validates the wattage values of old incandescent sets using studies from PG&E, BC Hydro, and the Ontario Power Authority, confirming that the wattage values used by ENSC are appropriate and no adjustment is needed.
ate. Thus, no adjustment is needed. The wattage used for the replacement set of LED lights provided by ENSC corresponds to the real wattage value of the C-6 LED lights offered through the program. 1 Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E),...
AI summary The document discusses the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focusing on the annual usage assumptions and unitary savings value. It compares different jurisdictions' approaches to estimating savings from LED holiday lighting, ultimately adopting ENSC's assumption of 40 days of annual usage with five hours of daily usage.
e, Econoler decided to use ENSC’s assumption of 40 days per year coupled with a daily usage of five hours, which represents an average value of all the studies mentioned above. Unitary Savings Value Econoler’s analysis of ENSC’s assumption...
AI summary Econoler evaluated ENSC's assumptions for program savings, including unitary savings value and diversity factor. Econoler found the unitary savings value of 35.2 kWh reasonable but questioned the use of a 100% diversity factor, suggesting it is not conservative given the likelihood of LED holiday lights being on during peak demand times.
ns indicated that the LED holiday lights would be turned on about five hours a day and that it would usually be in the evening, there was a high probability that the lights would be turned on between 4 BC Hydro, Make your Holiday Season Br...
AI summary The LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program's impact evaluation report discusses assumptions about the usage of LED holiday lights, including their operation during peak load times and the use of a diversity factor in demand savings calculations.
ases, the peak load occurred during the month of December. Therefore, a diversity factor of 50 percent was used in the demand savings calculations for the LHLE program. 2.2.3 Total Gross Savings The program gross savings for the years 2007...
AI summary The document details energy savings from the LHLE program between 2007 and 2011, using a diversity factor of 50% and a line loss factor of 1.1050. Total gross energy savings are reported as 1.633 GWh at the meter and 1.805 GWh at the generator level.
1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 Total Gross Energy Savings – at Generator (GWh) 0.219 0.291 0.398 0.392 0.506 1.805 Demand Savings Number of LED sets – from tracking sheet 5,622 7,475 10,223 10,075 13,004 46,399 Unitary peak dema...
AI summary The document presents data on energy and demand savings from the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation between 2007 and 2011, including tables with metrics such as total gross energy savings and demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2007 to 2011 Impact Evaluation Report 2.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of oth...
AI summary The report discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically the impact of replacing traditional holiday lights with LED lights in homes. It notes that LED lights generate less heat, leading to an increase in heating load during winter. This effect was previously addressed by Hydro-Québec, which only promoted external holiday lighting for energy savings.
Hydro-Québec for its holiday lighting program and it was agreed to remove any impact for electrically heated houses. Only external holiday lighting was promoted and considered for the energy savings. The table below presents the calculatio...
AI summary The LED Holiday Lighting Program's interactive effects factor calculation considers the proportion of households using electric heating and the installation location of LED lights. The factor is -19.8% due to energy savings from outdoor LED lights in electrically heated homes, while indoor installations had no impact.
generator. Table 6: Evaluation Results – Total Net Savings Energy Savings 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Total gross energy savings – at meter (GWh) 0.198 0.263 0.360 0.355 0.458 1.633 Interactive effects factor -19.8% -19.8% -19.8% -19.8%...
AI summary The document presents evaluation results of the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange Program from 2007 to 2011, detailing total net energy and demand savings at both meter and generator levels, including adjustments for interactive effects and line loss factors.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2007 to 2011 Impact Evaluation Report As shown below, the gross and net savings resulting from this evaluation were compared to the gross and net savings estimates from the 2011 tracking sheet. Table 7: C...
AI summary This report compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from 2007 to 2011. Evaluated savings are lower than tracked savings due to the inclusion of interactive effects, particularly from the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange (LHLE) program, which reduced savings by 19.8%.
LED holiday lights are not negligible. The interactive effects factor for the LHLE program was estimated at -19.8 percent by the Evaluator and was used in the net savings calculations. > The diversity factor: ENSC used a diversity factor o...
AI summary The document discusses adjustments to factors used in evaluating the energy savings of LED holiday lights, including interactive effects, diversity factors, and line loss factors. These adjustments resulted in more accurate net savings estimates of 1.447 GWh and 3.257 MW.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
ults –Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product ...................................... 38 Table 30: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator ........................................ 39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Efficient...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter (LIR) program, which installs energy-efficient products in subsidized housing for low-income renters in Nova Scotia. The evaluation involved interviews, site visits, and a survey of participants.
inted by stakeholders of the low-income rental market. Such needs include, among others, achieving energy efficiency upgrades in homes and providing further information on energy-efficient behaviours. In order to be eligible, participants...
AI summary The LIR program aimed to achieve energy efficiency upgrades in low-income rental homes and promote energy-efficient behaviors. It installed various energy-efficient products and achieved significant electricity and demand savings in 2011. The program was evaluated as having good potential for success as a pilot targeting an unexplored market.
arket that had not been explored before. The program totalled 4,920 participants for the year 2011. In terms of net energy savings, the program generated 4.809 GWh at the generator. Program Barriers The program partners contacted during th...
AI summary The program had 4,920 participants in 2011, generating 4.809 GWh in energy savings. Key barriers included limited participant numbers due to few eligible leads and concerns about CFLs, though health risks were not a major issue. Participant satisfaction was high, though some removed installed products.
em did remove certain products that had been installed through the program. On-site visits revealed that for 11 of the 15 sites visited, at least one product had been removed. Program Energy Savings To calculate the net savings of the LIR...
AI summary The evaluation of the LIR program in 2011 found that some products installed through the program had been removed from 11 out of 15 sites visited. Econoler calculated net energy and demand savings, assuming a net-to-gross ratio of 1 due to minimal distortion effects, resulting in 4.809 GWh of energy savings and 1.078 MW of demand savings.
allation rates and the interactive effects factors, the evaluation revealed that the LIR program had generated net energy savings of 4.809 GWh and demand savings of 1.078 MW at the generator in 2011. Table 1: Comparison of Tracked and Eval...
AI summary The evaluation of the LIR program in 2011 showed net energy savings of 4.809 GWh and demand savings of 1.078 MW, which were 7% lower than the tracked savings by ENSC. The difference was attributed to the installation rate for power bars with integrated timers and interactive effects, as well as adjustments made to unitary savings estimates.
y savings estimates used in the tracking sheet, they were in most cases revised upward. The table below shows such changes. Table 2: 2011 Program Unitary Savings Adjustments Unitary Savings Values (kWh/year) Products Tracked Evaluated 13 w...
AI summary The document discusses revisions to unitary savings estimates for various energy-efficient products in the 2011 program evaluation, showing increases in savings values for items such as CFLs, LED lights, and low-flow showerheads.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report RECOMMENDATIONS Econoler found that the program is well on its way to becoming successful. In addition to general recommendations presented for all ENSC programs in the overall exec...
AI summary Econoler's 2011 evaluation report on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's programs recommends monitoring program barriers and participant concerns, such as the perceived health risks of CFLs, to ensure the program's success and proper addressing of participant issues.
e perceived health risk becomes a more important barrier among participants, ENSC could develop a brochure to better inform the participants about the technologies installed. LIR-R2. Improve measure sustainability: The on-site visits revea...
AI summary Econoler recommends improving measure sustainability by providing more information on products installed through the program, such as LED nightlights and faucet aerators, to prevent removal and ensure proper usage. It also suggests increasing the number of on-site visits to better assess installation rates and validate product use.
of on-site visits in order to have a reasonable precision level that would allow for the establishment of installation rates for CFLs, LED nightlights and faucet aerators. Ref.: 5725 viii Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Effi...
AI summary The document discusses the need for more precise evaluation of savings in the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program. It highlights the need to collect additional data, such as heating types and air conditioning use, to improve the accuracy of impact evaluations and ensure that new lighting products effectively replace less efficient ones.
At first, Econoler had planned to validate such information during on-site visits but participants did not know the exact wattage of the old lamps replaced in their home. Ref.: 5725 ix Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficie...
AI summary The Low Income Renter (LIR) program, launched by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in March 2011, installs energy-efficient products in low-income rental housing. The program initially focused on subsidized housing and later expanded to include mini-home parks. It is modeled after the direct install component of the Low Income program and is expected to expand to the wider rental market in 2012.
pies of the interview guides and the survey questionnaire are included in Appendices IV, V and VI. Figure 2: Methodological Model 2.2 METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION 2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information The first task in the process evalua...
AI summary The evaluation of the Low Income Renter (LIR) program involved analyzing program documentation, conducting interviews with the Program Manager, and planning interviews with program partners. The evaluation focused on program justification, savings calculations, barriers, marketing strategies, and the roles of partners.
or the 2011 survey included 1,887 participants (1,689 participants with no missing names, phone numbers, or both), which was the number of program participants at the time of conducting the survey. Ref.: 5725 5 Efficient Products – Low Inc...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Low Income Renter Program discusses the process evaluation conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The evaluation aimed to assess the program's design and delivery effectiveness through interviews and participant surveys. The program manual is still in development as the program is a pilot.
more, the content of all program manuals should be standardized based on the same template so that it is easier to locate specific sections or subjects. 3.3 PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of the tracking sheet for the...
AI summary The report discusses the need for standardizing program manuals and reviews the tracking sheet for the Low Income Renter (LIR) program. It highlights the tracking sheet's functionality, including unique project identification numbers and energy savings calculations, but notes missing customer information and inconsistencies in product categorization.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The program tracking sheet was also evaluated by the PM during the interview. The PM is satisfied with the tracking sheet and considers it easy to use. Although the tracking sheet i...
AI summary The program tracking sheet used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation was evaluated and found to be relatively complete and easy to use. However, recommendations were made to improve data collection for future evaluations, including adding fields for heating types, air conditioning use, and details about old lamps.
concerns are related to CFLs (too dim, presence of mercury, etc.). Questions to investigate these barriers were included in the participant survey. It appears that only one respondent out of 70 has Ref.: 5725 10 Efficient Products – Low In...
AI summary The document discusses concerns about CFLs, including their dimness and mercury content, and mentions that only one out of 70 survey respondents expressed concerns about mercury. It highlights the need to monitor program barriers and adjust marketing strategies. The DA suggests using NSPI's customer database to target eligible participants, while ENSC must determine if this data is accessible.
15 Refused 5 Don’t know 7 65 Ref.: 5725 11 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The vast majority of participants did not have any concerns about taking part in the progra...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program found that 93% of participants had no concerns about joining the program, while only 3% had concerns, primarily related to health risks. Most participants retained all installed energy efficiency products, with 89% keeping them and 7% removing at least one.
ough the program. Since the installation, most surveyed participants stated that they had kept all installed products (89%), as just under one in 10 indicated having removed at least one product (7%). When it comes to product removal, ther...
AI summary The program's evaluation found that most participants retained installed energy efficiency products, but some removed them. On-site visits revealed discrepancies between self-reported removal and actual findings, with only a few instances of product removal. The Evaluator recommends improving participant education on product benefits to enhance program sustainability.
89 Don’t know 3 Refused 1 Ref.: 5725 12 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report From the very few participants who indicated having removed at least one energy-efficient prod...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses participant experiences with energy-efficient products, noting that some removed them due to performance or health concerns. It also highlights that 60% of participants changed their energy use behavior after receiving information during product installation visits.
2 Other 17 Don’t know 14 Ref.: 5725 13 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Just under four in 10 participants indicated that the products installed were successful in low...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program found that 37% of participants noticed a decrease in energy bills after installation, while 30% saw no change and 11% saw an increase. A significant portion (21%) were uncertain about the impact due to recent installation or lack of information.
of 1 or 2 to express their dissatisfaction (5% combined), while just under two in 10 offered a mid-range score of 3 (16%). Table 12: Overall Experience with the LIR program Level of Satisfaction 2011 Sample Size 69 Very satisfied – 5 55% 4...
AI summary The LIR program received high satisfaction ratings in 2011, with 55% of participants very satisfied and 23% satisfied. The primary reasons for satisfaction included lower energy bills, good service, and energy savings. These findings are based on a sample size of 69 participants.
cotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 13: Satisfaction with the Program Reasons for Satisfaction 2011 Sample Size 54 Lowered energy bill 28% Good service 22 Saves energy 17 Better lights/lighting 11 Replaced the lights 11 Explaine...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report discusses participant satisfaction with a program, highlighting that 28% were satisfied due to lowered energy bills, while others cited good service and energy savings. A small group of neutral respondents mentioned dissatisfaction with lamps and lack of perceived bill reductions.
that more was expected of the program, although the small sample size warrants caution in the interpretation of these results. Table 14: Neutral Impression of the Program Reasons for Being Neutral 2011 (#) Sample Size 11 Don’t like the lig...
AI summary The evaluation report notes that participants had a neutral impression of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, with some expressing dissatisfaction due to bills not decreasing as expected. A small sample size limits the interpretation of results.
69% 27 5 Overall communication 62 66% 18 10 2 4 Don’t know/no answer removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 17 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.5 Recommendations for...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Low Income Renter Program found that 81% of respondents had no recommendations for improvement, while the remaining 19% suggested improvements such as better lighting products, more product options, and increased information on installed products.
1 Other 6 No recommendations 81 Ref.: 5725 18 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 IMPACT EVALUATION 4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evalu...
AI summary This section outlines the impact evaluation of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program in 2011, focusing on determining gross and net savings through unitary savings analysis and on-site visits to validate installations and data accuracy.
after installation. Moreover, product information was collected through on-site observations or homeowner interviews in order to validate the assumptions used to calculate the product unitary savings: > For lighting measures: power of lamp...
AI summary The document outlines the process for collecting product information to validate unitary savings assumptions for energy efficiency measures, such as lighting, power bars, faucet aerators, and insulation. It also mentions the use of past evaluations and studies, including the 2011 Ontario Power Authority report, for estimating savings.
report3 or on other reliable secondary sources of data. This document is a reliable secondary data source in which the assumptions used for savings calculations are well documented. 4.2.1 CFLs ENSC uses the same unitary savings value of 41...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 41 kWh for 13 W CFLs based on a 2009 evaluation, which considered their replacement of 60 W incandescent bulbs. This value was later revised by Econoler for two types of CFLs (13 W and 23 W), with separate savings values assigned for each.
watt and 23 watt CFLs. Since these two types of products are entered separately in the tracking sheet, Econoler elected to establish a different unitary savings value for each of them. 13 Watt CFLs According to the ENERGY STAR light output...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings values for 13 watt and 23 watt CFLs, including considerations of light output equivalency, daily usage estimates, and the preference for metering data over self-declared usage estimates.
60 13 2.7 365 46.3 1000 23 Watt CFLs For estimating the unitary savings value for 23 watt CFLs, the average displaced wattage was estimated by calculating the difference between the actual wattage of the CFLs (23 W) and the average wattage...
AI summary The document discusses the estimation of energy savings from replacing incandescent lamps with 23 watt CFLs, using data from the Efficient Products – Direct Install program. It notes that 23 watt CFLs replace 93.5 watt incandescent lamps, resulting in an average displaced wattage of 70.5 W. The usage of 23 watt CFLs was adjusted to 2.7 hours per day based on a metering study.
erage displaced wattage of 70.5 W. As for 13 watt CFLs, the daily usage of 23 watt CFLs was adjusted to 2.7 hours, based on a metering study conducted for Hydro-Québec’s residential lighting program. The review resulted in a unitary saving...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for 23 watt CFLs and CFL compatible floor lamps. Adjustments were made based on metering studies and participant feedback, though some assumptions remain unverified. Future evaluations should collect more precise data on replaced wattage.
stimated at 241 kWh, based on the Navigant study mentioned earlier. The assumptions used to estimate this value were not available. Thereby, Econoler based its review on other studies and assumptions. The average displaced wattage was esti...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from CFL torchieres installed through the Low Income Renter Program, adjusting the estimated annual unitary savings from 241 kWh to 69.5 kWh based on real data and assumptions about wattage and usage.
e, the unitary savings estimation of 241 kWh will be adjusted to the 69.5 kWh value calculated from the real data of the CFL torchieres installed through the LIR program. 4.2.3 LED Nightlights Based on a technical reference manual from the...
AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of unitary savings estimates for CFL torchieres and LED nightlights under the LIR program. The savings for CFL torchieres are revised based on real data, while LED nightlights are evaluated using assumptions from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's technical reference manual.
efore, the nightlights installed in rooms that are not affected by daylight are likely to remain 5 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, “Technical Reference Manual,” Pennsylvania, June 2011. Ref.: 5725 23 Efficient Products – Low Income...
AI summary The document discusses the energy savings from LED nightlights installed under the Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It calculates the unitary savings value based on displaced wattage and average operating time, using data from on-site visits and daylight exposure in Halifax.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Seasonal LED Lights ENSC offers seasonal LED lights to LIR program participants. The unitary savings estimate for this product is 17.52 kWh per set of lamps. This value is bas...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) provides seasonal LED lights to low-income renters (LIR) as part of its energy efficiency programs. The unitary savings estimate for this initiative is 17.52 kWh per set of lamps, calculated based on the wattage of old incandescent sets and new LED sets, along with their usage patterns.
(35 lamps per set) Average displaced wattage (90 W – 2.4 W) = 87.6 W Annual usage 5 h/day × 40 days/yr = 200 h/yr Annual Savings 87.6 W × 200 h/yr = 17.52 kWh Econoler reviewed this savings estimate. The proportions of each type of old set...
AI summary The document calculates annual energy savings from replacing old holiday lighting with LED lights, using wattage data from various sources including PG&E, BC Hydro, and the Ontario Power Authority. The savings are based on in-field observations from the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange program.
Large incandescent 5W Ontario Power Authority Report9 Mini incandescent 0.5 W These studies demonstrate that the wattage values used by ENSC for large and mini incandescent light sets are appropriate. Thus, no adjustment is needed. The wat...
AI summary The text discusses the validation of wattage values and usage assumptions for LED holiday lighting by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), based on studies and comparisons with other jurisdictions. It confirms that ENSC's assumptions are reasonable and appropriate for calculating energy savings.
s distributed through the program are reasonable. As a result, the unitary savings value of 17.52 kWh was used in the evaluation to compute the gross energy savings achieved with seasonal LED lights. 7 Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy savings from seasonal LED lights and faucet aerators, citing studies and reports. A unitary savings value of 17.52 kWh was used for LED lights, while faucet aerators had an estimated value of 86 kWh based on a Navigant study, though assumptions are not available.
on other studies and assumptions to conduct its evaluation. To calculate the unitary savings value, Econoler reviewed two studies estimating the annual value for the installation of faucet aerators. Table 21: Unitary Savings Estimate for F...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for faucet aerators based on studies from other jurisdictions, including the OPA and Wisconsin Focus on Energy. It uses the OPA value of 176.30 kWh per year as it is more appropriate for Canadian provinces and aligns with ENSC program standards.
deemed acceptable for most products promoted through ENSC programs. Therefore, the unitary savings value that is used in the current evaluation is 176.30 kWh per year. 4.2.6 Low-Flow Showerheads For low-flow showerheads, ENSC uses a unitar...
AI summary The unitary savings value for low-flow showerheads promoted through ENSC programs is 157 kWh, based on data from the OPA report and assumptions about flow rates, shower frequency, and temperature. This value is used to evaluate energy savings in the Low Income Renter Program.
minutes Average Shower Temperature 40°C (104°F) Annual Savings 377 kWh per household Econoler considers these parameters reliable and conservative. On its website, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) promotes the installation of low-flow show...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from low-flow showerheads and power bars with integrated timers under the Low Income Renter Program. It references Natural Resources Canada and the Ontario Power Authority for savings estimates, using 377 kWh and 53 kWh as unitary savings values respectively.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 23: OPA Unitary Savings Estimate for Power Bars with Integrated Timer Entertainment Computer Parameters Lighting Others Centres Systems Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Aver...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the OPA Unitary Savings Estimate for Power Bars with Integrated Timer, including parameters like proportion, average wattage, operating time, and annual savings. It confirms the acceptability of these assumptions and notes the continued use of the unitary savings value in various programs.
stalled through the LIR program. This unitary savings value is also used in the ENSC Retail Markdown Program and the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter program. 4.2.8 Pipe Insulation The LIR program proposes the installatio...
AI summary The LIR program includes energy efficiency measures such as pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps for renters. ENSC uses unitary savings values based on past evaluations, including the 2009 Low Income Homeowner program and the OPA report. The savings values are adjusted based on pipe sizes commonly used in residential settings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The annual unitary savings for both single- and multi-family households were estimated at 270 kWh. Since the assumptions used by the OPA to estimate this unitary savings value are c...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation estimates annual unitary savings at 270 kWh for single- and multi-family households. The report discusses the LIR program's direct installation approach, product removal verification, and methods for measuring installation rates, including the use of timers on energy-efficient power bars.
erifying that the end-users were using the timer. This timer is specific to an energy-efficient power bar, and not using it prevents the reduction of standby power and thus the achievement of savings. The table below shows the percentages...
AI summary The text discusses the verification of energy-efficient product usage, specifically focusing on the installation rates and percentages of products installed through a program. It highlights discrepancies between on-site visits and installation rates, particularly for certain product categories, and notes that a 100% installation rate was applied where precision was too low.
Low-flow showerheads 4 4 100% 100% Power bars with timer 7 0 0% 0% Pipe insulation 3 3 100% 100% Ref.: 5725 30 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Hot water tank wraps 3...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program in 2011 shows high installation rates for items like low-flow showerheads, pipe insulation, and hot water tank wraps. A minor issue was noted with CFLs, where only one participant out of 70 removed a CFL, though this was considered a localized occurrence.
f 100 percent for this product. This result was confirmed during the telephone survey. Only one participant out of 70 revealed having removed one of their CFLs after their installation by the program. A significant level of removal was fou...
AI summary The evaluation of installed energy efficiency products found that most CFLs remained installed, but significant removal rates were observed for faucet aerators, LED nightlights, and power bars with timers. Econoler recommends increasing on-site visits to improve installation rates and ensure proper usage of products for energy savings.
essed in the future by ensuring that participants have received all the necessary information to use the timer and that they understand the necessity of using it to achieve the desired energy savings. In a few cases (low-flow showerheads,...
AI summary The report discusses the installation rates for energy-efficient products in the Low Income Renter (LIR) program, noting 100% installation rates for several items. It also details the energy-to-demand ratio used to calculate demand savings and provides revised gross savings for the program, both at the meter and generator levels.
el are also estimated in Table 25, using a line loss factor between the meter and the generator of 1.1043 (provided by NSPI). They correspond to energy and demand savings of 5.492 GWh and 1.231 MW. Ref.: 5725 32 Efficient Products – Low In...
AI summary The text references Table 25, which estimates energy and demand savings from the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, using a line loss factor provided by NSPI. The savings are reported as 5.492 GWh of energy and 1.231 MW of demand.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 25: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings by Product
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report includes Table 25, which presents evaluation results focusing on gross energy and demand savings by product. This table is likely used to assess the effectiveness of energy efficiency programs and their impact on energy consumption.
Low-Flow 13 Watt 23 Watt CFL LED Seasonal Faucet Power Bars Pipe Hot Water Product Category Shower- CFLs CFLs Torchieres Nightlights LED lights Aerators with Timer Insulation Tank Wraps heads Energy Savings Number of units – 49,563 12,482...
AI summary The document presents data on energy savings from various low-flow and energy-efficient products installed across different categories, including CFLs, LED lights, faucet aerators, and pipe insulation. It includes metrics such as the number of units installed, energy savings at the meter and generator levels, and demand savings.
0 0.153 0.304 – at Generator (GWh) Demand Savings Energy-to-demand ratio 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 4.46 Total Gross Demand 0.515 0.195 0.004 0.050 0.001 0.137 0.122 0 0.031 0.062 Savings – at Meter (MW) Line loss factor...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically the replacement of lighting products with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in the Low Income Renter (LIR) program. This change increases heating load in winter and decreases cooling load in summer due to the reduced heat output of CFLs.
ing products with CFLs causes an increase in the heating load during winter and a decrease in the cooling load during summer. Indeed, a CFL releases less heat than the less efficient lamp it replaces. For CFLs, CFL torchieres and LED night...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of replacing traditional light bulbs with CFLs and LED nightlights on heating and cooling loads, and the use of an interactive effects factor in evaluating these changes. The factor is based on a 1992 study by ADS for Hydro-Québec, and calculations involve data on low-income renters and air conditioning usage in Nova Scotia.
ccepted software building energy analysis program developed under funding from the U.S. Department of Energy. 17 Statistics Canada (CANSIM), Households having air conditioning, Nova Scotia, 2009. Ref.: 5725 34 Efficient Products – Low Inco...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, including an analysis of interactive effects factors for energy-efficient products like CFLs and LED nightlights across different heating and air conditioning scenarios.
3.6% No electric heating without air conditioning 71% × 82% = 58.2% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -16.2% For seasonal LED lights, the interactive effects factor is estimated at -100 percent for indoor installation in electric...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects factor for seasonal LED lights, particularly in electrically heated homes without air conditioning. It estimates a -100% interactive effects factor for indoor installations, as all energy from holiday lights contributes to heating load. Econoler used data from the LED Holiday Lighting Exchange program to determine installation ratios and calculate the factor.
not possible to determine whether participants would install the lights inside our outside. Therefore, Econoler used the most reliable data available for the calculation of the interactive effects. 18 From DA information and Statistics Can...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects factor for seasonal LED lights in the context of the Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It uses data on the percentage of residences using electric heating and calculates the impact of LED light installations on energy savings.
heating – Outdoor seasonal LED lights 71% × 40% = 28.4% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -17.4% For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, interactive effects of -100 percent are considered during the heating period in electr...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects factors for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, considering heating and cooling periods. During heating, a -100% interactive effect is assumed for electrically heated homes, while during cooling, a +100% interactive effect is assumed for homes with air conditioning. The weighted interactive effects factor for lighting products is calculated as -16.3% based on regional data.
onditioning in Nova Scotia, which resulted in a weighted interactive effects factor of -16.3 percent. Table 28: Interactive Effects Factor for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Interactive Effects Interactive Effects Parameters % of...
AI summary The document calculates the weighted interactive effects factor for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps in Nova Scotia, resulting in a -16.3 percent factor. It uses data on electric heating and air conditioning prevalence and considers effects during heating and cooling periods.
ther. Table 29 presents the details of the calculation. Overall, the total net energy and demand savings amount to 4.335 GWh and 0.976 MW at the meter, and 4.809 GWh and 1.078 MW at the generator. Ref.: 5725 37 Efficient Products – Low Inc...
AI summary The document provides evaluation results for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, highlighting net energy and demand savings. The total net energy savings are 4.335 GWh at the meter and 4.809 GWh at the generator, with corresponding demand savings of 0.976 MW and 1.078 MW.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 29: Evaluation Results –Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report includes Table 29, which presents evaluation results focusing on net energy and demand savings by product. This table likely provides data on the effectiveness of various energy efficiency programs or initiatives in reducing energy consumption and demand.
Seasonal Low-Flow 13 Watt 23 Watt CFL LED Faucet Power Bars Pipe Hot Water Product Category LED Shower- CFLs CFLs Torchieres Nightlights Aerators with Timer Insulation Tank Wraps Lights heads Energy Savings Total gross energy savings 2.295...
AI summary The text presents energy savings data across various product categories, including LED, CFL, and other energy-efficient devices. It includes metrics like gross energy savings, net energy savings at the meter and generator, and demand savings, along with factors such as interactive effects and line loss.
2 savings – at meter (MWh) Interactive effects factor -16.2% -16.2% -16.2% -16.2% -17.4% 0% 0% 0% -16.3% -16.3% NTGR 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Net Demand 0.431 0.163 0.003 0.042 0.001 0.137 0.122 0 0.026 0.052...
AI summary This section compares energy and demand savings from the 2011 tracking sheet with evaluated savings from the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, highlighting the performance of the program in achieving its energy efficiency goals.
m this evaluation were compared to the energy and demand savings from the 2011 tracking sheet in the table below. Table 30: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Installed Gross Installed Initial Gross Savings with N...
AI summary The evaluation of energy and demand savings from the 2011 tracking sheet shows that actual savings were 7 percent lower than those tracked by ENSC. This discrepancy is attributed to several factors, though they are not detailed in the provided text.
1.231 MW 1.078 MW 1.00 1.078 MW The fact that the energy and demand savings fell short of those tracked by ENSC by 7 percent can be explained by the following factors: > Revision of the unitary savings values: For CFLs, LED nightlights, fa...
AI summary The energy and demand savings tracked by ENSC fell short by 7 percent due to revised unitary savings values, the addition of an installation rate for some products, and the consideration of interactive effects on heating and cooling loads.
duct replacements, pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps are not negligible. Interactive effects factors were estimated for these products and used in the net savings calculations. Ref.: 5725 39 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Pr...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses energy savings calculations for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program, including adjustments to line loss factors and the inclusion of installation rates and interactive effects factors to improve estimation accuracy. These changes reduced program savings estimates, but significant savings were still observed in the program's first year.
Program 1. Document important program practices: Manual – The disposal of old products should be documented in the program manual to Content have a complete description of the implementation process. – There are no instructions related to...
AI summary The text discusses the need for improved documentation in program manuals, specifically regarding the disposal of old products, energy source information for installations, and the provision of a 'base case' for calculating savings. It also highlights the importance of documenting parameters used to estimate program objectives, including distortion and interactive effects.
ly based on past evaluation results, market intelligence, secondary research and other sources. The program manual should document these parameters so that the PM and the Evaluator can keep track of the assumptions used to estimate the pro...
AI summary The document discusses the need to improve the program manual for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by documenting parameters, standardizing content, and ensuring it serves as a reference for program modifications and staff changes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011. It provides an analysis of the organization's activities and outcomes related to energy efficiency programs.
Program 5. Collect additional information on the products installed: The PM, together Tracking with the evaluator, should determine what fields are necessary for administration Sheet and evaluation purposes and ensure the information is sy...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving data collection in energy efficiency programs. It emphasizes the need to track specific product details, such as heating types and lighting specifications, and ensures systematic entry of customer information for better evaluation and follow-up activities.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, likely assessing the performance or outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives or programs.
Relationship 9. Monitor program barriers: Program barriers should be frequently monitored to with Partners adjust the program components or the marketing strategy and ensure that the barriers are addressed. For example, if the perceived he...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving energy efficiency programs, including monitoring program barriers, enhancing product sustainability through better information sharing, and collecting data on replaced wattage during installations to validate savings calculations.
cent of the CFLs installed through the program. Nevertheless, the on-site visits did not allow Econoler to confirm that 23 watt CFLs had been used to replace old incandescent lamps with an equivalent light output. Since participants could...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program highlights issues with data collection during on-site visits, including the inability to confirm wattage replacements and the need for more visits to accurately assess installation rates. It also recommends collecting information on air conditioning use for future evaluations.
4 Some educational material will be prepared for participating tenants to be Educational and training material given by the DA after installing the energy-efficient products. 5 The DA will install the products in Tracking data and activiti...
AI summary The document outlines a program involving the installation of energy-efficient products in tenants' apartments by a DA, with the goal of increasing energy savings and participant awareness. Educational materials will be provided, and data on installations will be tracked and reported to ENSC. The program also includes future evaluations and sustainability indicators.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report C: It would be useful to know what kind of arrangement there is between the building administration and the low-income renter (for each building) in regards to the method of sharing...
AI summary The text discusses questions and comments related to the evaluation of a program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on cost-sharing arrangements between building administrations and low-income renters, process evaluation, program theory, and barriers addressed by the program. It also asks about evaluation plans, marketing strategies, and data management challenges.
f you were a program partner before it changed status and name from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, how was this transition perceived in the market? Not applicable Unnoticed Some confusion Ref.: 5725 51 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter...
AI summary The text discusses the transition of a program from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC and how it was perceived by program partners, including confusion and impacts on relationships with the Program Administrator. It also asks about complaints received and the ease of participation in the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program.
October 5, 2011 I1. Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GOTO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] [INTRODUCTION] V1. Hello, my name is _ and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Assoc...
AI summary This text outlines a phone script used by CRA (Corporate Research Associates) to conduct a survey with participants of Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy efficiency program. The script aims to gather feedback on the program's effectiveness and includes options for participants who may not be available or do not recall participating.
satisfied with the program overall? PROBE: Anything else? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. ACCEPT MULTIPLE. RECORD FIRST/SUBSEQUENT MENTIONS SEPARATELY] RECORD VERBATIM RESPONSE Now I am going to read a list of specific aspects of the program....
AI summary The text outlines a survey process to assess customer satisfaction with a program, focusing on aspects such as communication, time required for work, installed energy conservation measures, and the quality of work completed. It also inquires about changes in energy behavior following an installer's visit.
f air conditioning) 7. (Close doors and windows) 8. (Turn off appliances) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 60 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluati...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation evaluation report asks participants in the Low Income Renter Program about energy efficiency measures they installed and whether they later removed any of them from their homes. It lists various measures and provides response options.
lledDateJob.ProcessingDate]. Since these measures were installed, what changes, if any, have you noticed in your energy bills? Have ... READ STATEMENTS IN ORDER - RECORD ONE RESPONSE 1. Your bills gone down 2. Your bills gone up, or 3. Has...
AI summary This section of the document asks participants in the Low Income Renter Program about changes in their energy bills and comfort levels after energy efficiency measures were installed. It includes questions on perceived improvements in comfort, energy bill changes, and knowledge of energy efficiency.
lasting hot water 3. Improved indoor lighting 4. Improved outdoor lighting 96. (Other [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) 1 (Yes) 2 (No) 98 (Don’t know) 99 (Refused) Section R - Interest in other possible measures and recommendatio...
AI summary The document presents survey questions related to energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on interest in additional energy-saving measures and recommendations for improving the program. It includes options for products and measures not covered by the program and invites respondents to provide feedback on how the program could be improved.
[SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) R3. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the program? PROBE: Anything else? 1. (Offer more products/measures to be installed) 2. (Offer more information on the produc...
AI summary The document contains survey responses and demographic questions from a program evaluation report, focusing on recommendations for improving the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes responses on product offerings, communication, and work quality, along with demographic data on residence type and bedroom count.
eclaration): CFL Compatible Floor Lamps Database Info Validation Date of installation: Number of units installed: Number of lamps per fixture: Power of CFL lamps [watt]: Type of lamp replaced (contact declaration): Power of lamp replaced (...
AI summary This document contains forms and data collection templates related to energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the installation and removal of energy-efficient products such as CFL floor lamps, power bars with timers, faucet aerators, and low-flow showerheads. The forms request information on installation dates, quantities, and reasons for removal.
Validation Date of installation: Number of units installed: Number of units removed after installation: Explanation (contact declaration): Source of energy for water heating: Ref.: 5725 69 Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program Eff...
AI summary The document outlines validation forms and evaluation reports related to energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including the Efficient Products – Low Income Renter Program and the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program, with data collection details and a 2011 evaluation report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of its operations and performance during that year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, detailing the organization's performance and outcomes related to energy efficiency initiatives in the region.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, likely assessing the performance or outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives or programs during that period.
............. 37 Table 29: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator ........................................ 38 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Logic Model .............
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Multi-Unit Residential Renter (MURR) program, which aimed to educate tenants on energy efficiency through events and direct installation of energy-efficient products in selected communities across Nova Scotia. The evaluation included interviews, site visits, and a survey of participants.
ton Regional Municipality (CBRM) and the Town of Antigonish were selected to hold events in common areas, during which tenants could be informed one-on-one and ask energy efficiency-related questions. The program also conducted direct inst...
AI summary The MURR program conducted direct installs of energy-efficient products in 853 households in 2011, achieving 0.651 GWh of net energy savings. Participant satisfaction was very high, with no reports of dissatisfaction. The program was delivered by Summerhill and targeted specific energy savings goals.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Installation of Products During the telephone survey, participants were asked to confirm the products that had been installed through the program. The survey results demonstrate the...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation highlights that the program's product installation tracking is accurate, with a 100% installation rate for CFLs. However, power bars with integrated timers are not being used correctly, resulting in lower energy savings due to the timer's non-use.
Free-Ridership Level 17% Spillover Level 0% Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.83 Ref.: 5725 vi Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Using the revised unitary savings values...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program in 2011 indicates that the program generated net energy savings of 0.651 GWh and demand savings of 0.104 MW at the generator. This includes savings from two additional pilot projects.
.104 MW at the generator in 2011. These results include the savings generated by the two additional pilot projects. Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Installed Gross Savings Initial Gross Installed with...
AI summary The evaluation report shows that the net energy and demand savings from the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program exceeded the tracked savings. The revision of unitary savings values for items like CFLs and thermostats explains the difference.
d not have installed any energy-efficient products in the absence of the program. This result shows the need for increasing awareness for energy efficiency in this market. Ref.: 5725 ix Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Pr...
AI summary The Multi-Unit Residential Renter (MURR) program, launched by Efficiency Nova Scotia in 2011, aimed to educate tenants in multi-unit buildings about energy efficiency through events and product installations. The program included the installation of energy-efficient products and opportunities for tenants to retire old appliances.
raps. The program also provided tenants with the opportunity to retire and recycle their old dehumidifiers and room air conditioner units in exchange for a rebate coupon from a participating retailer. Buildings across the Halifax Regional...
AI summary The program targeted buildings in the Halifax Regional Municipality, CBRM, and Antigonish, offering tenants rebates for retiring old appliances and installing energy-efficient products. Summerhill Group was the delivery agent, and the program achieved electricity and demand savings. Two pilot projects were also conducted, using similar direct installation methods as the MURR program.
onnaire are included in Appendices IV, V and VI. Figure 2: Methodological Model 2.2 METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION 2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information The first task in the process evaluation of the MURR program was the analysis of the p...
AI summary The evaluation of the MURR program involved analyzing program documentation, conducting interviews with the Program Manager and Delivery Agent, and examining topics such as program justification, savings calculations, barriers, marketing strategies, and partner roles.
gram DA. This interview was intended, among other things, to understand the DA’s involvement in the program, their participation process as well as their perception and satisfaction with the program. 2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November, five...
AI summary The document describes the evaluation of the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program, including on-site visits to validate product installations and a telephone survey of participants to assess their experiences and perceptions of the program.
details of gross savings and hypothesis for free- ridership and other effects) Details about the savings calculations and type of products Budget per year Ref.: 5725 6 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency N...
AI summary The document discusses the need for an in-depth program manual for the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program, highlighting the current lack of detailed content such as cost-effectiveness test results, marketing plans, and evaluation plans. Econoler has proposed recommendations for improving the manual if the program is officially launched.
ted savings for each product. Therefore, Econoler proposes the following recommendations that are aimed at assisting ENSC in its production of an in-depth manual if the program is officially launched: > Explain the nature of the energy aud...
AI summary Econoler recommends clarifying the nature of energy audits and providing a 'base case' for calculating energy savings in ENSC's program manual to ensure accuracy and transparency in the program's implementation.
nitoring and evaluation purposes. 3.3 PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler has reviewed the content of the tracking sheet for the MURR program. The tracking sheet presents information in one sheet. In general, the tracking sheet is easy to use...
AI summary The tracking sheet for the MURR program is functional for program administration but lacks direct monitoring of savings. Econoler recommends adding unitary savings values and establishing a validation protocol to improve data accuracy and program evaluation.
port source used for domestic hot water heating. This way, it will be possible to confirm that product replacements have only been made where domestic hot water is electrically heated. > Collect information for establishing base cases: The...
AI summary The text outlines steps for collecting information to establish base cases and line loss factors for program evaluation. It emphasizes the importance of tracking product replacements, particularly for electrically heated domestic hot water systems, and suggests collecting specific data such as old lamp wattage and thermostat types for accurate savings estimation.
d again in the future, Econoler recommends collecting the participants' rate codes in order to establish the line loss factor in a more precise way. 3.4 PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION The MURR program was launched in 2011 as a pilot pro...
AI summary The document discusses the MURR program, launched in 2011 as a pilot, and highlights the lack of an evaluation plan. Econoler recommends creating an evaluation plan during program design to ensure data collection and rigorous evaluation. The delivery agent reports satisfaction with the program and no major barriers, though challenges arose from the program's short duration and timing.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report time: it began in August, which is a busy time of the year for property managers and impedes property manager recruitment. According to the DA, the events should have started in the...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the timing and capacity issues of an efficiency program, noting that events were scheduled during a busy period for property managers. The report also addresses the installation of CFLs, finding that the program's outcomes were satisfactory despite concerns about limited capacity and existing CFL installations.
cerns regarding the opportunities for replacing remaining incandescent lamps with CFLs, the Evaluator finds the latter satisfactory based on the results from the tracking sheet and the on-site visits. To improve the program, the DA recomme...
AI summary The evaluation of the MURR program highlights the success of replacing incandescent lamps with CFLs and identifies areas for improvement, such as better defining program scope and improving marketing materials to avoid confusion among participants.
save energy (10%) or to help the environment (7%). Other reasons are generally consistent with the most important mentions. Table 6: Reasons for Participating in Program 2011 Reasons for Participating Single Most Other Important Reasons Re...
AI summary The table highlights the primary reasons for participating in an energy efficiency program, with the majority citing saving on energy costs as the most important reason, followed by general energy savings and environmental benefits. Other reasons are less frequently mentioned.
Refused 20 Don’t know 40 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 11 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.2 Participant Barriers The participant survey did not establ...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program found that only 7% of participants had concerns about the program, primarily related to cost or distrust. Additionally, 17% of respondents did not install some recommended energy-efficient products, believing they were not needed.
100% Low-flow showerheads 12 12 Faucet aerators 13 10 1 2 Ref.: 5725 13 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.4 Program Influence The most important factor...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program's influence was driven by factors such as free installation, advice from program advisors, and information from events. Previous experience had a lesser impact on the decision to install energy-efficient products.
rea of the building (mean score of 8.1). Previous experience was less important, with a mean score of 5.8. Table 11: Importance in Decision to Install Energy-Efficient Products Through the Program Importance in Decision to Install Energy-E...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of various factors in the decision to install energy-efficient products through a program, with free installation and program advisor information being highly valued. It also notes that 13% of respondents removed some products post-installation, though this appears to be isolated and not targeted at specific products.
dating the removal of the faucet aerators and the low-flow showerheads (see Section 4.2.14 for additional information). Table 12: Removal of Energy-Efficient Products Post-Program Products Removed 2011 Sample Size 30 Yes 13% No 87 Ref.: 57...
AI summary The document discusses the removal of energy-efficient products, such as faucet aerators and low-flow showerheads, after the program's implementation. It also highlights improvements in participants' interest and knowledge of energy efficiency following their involvement in the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program.
NA Interest in energy efficiency 30 17% 33 37 3 7 3 Knowledge of energy efficiency 30 17% 30 30 17 3 3 Survey results also indicate that the MURR program has had an impact on the energy behaviour of participants. Indeed, three-quarters of...
AI summary Survey results show that the MURR program significantly influenced participants' energy behavior, with 76% reporting changes in energy use habits. Common changes included turning off lights (64%) and appliances (41%), with smaller percentages reducing water usage and adjusting thermostats.
othes 9 Set heating thermostat lower 5 Other 23 Ref.: 5725 15 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.7 Satisfaction with the Program Nearly all MURR program...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program indicates that nearly all participants (96%) were satisfied with their overall experience, with no respondents expressing dissatisfaction.
Very dissatisfied – 1 Don’t know/refused removed from calculations Respondents were asked to rate various aspects of the MURR program. Results show a very high level of satisfaction. All respondents were satisfied with the program represen...
AI summary Respondents expressed very high satisfaction with the MURR program, particularly with the program representative and information received about energy efficiency. Most were also satisfied with the time required to complete work and the products installed, though satisfaction with the energy evaluation of their apartment was lower.
24 7 3 The energy evaluation of your apartment 25 48% 44 8 Don’t know/don’t recall removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 16 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report...
AI summary The 2011 impact evaluation of the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program assessed energy and demand savings, analyzing unitary savings, installation rates, energy-to-demand ratios, and interactive effects. On-site visits and participant surveys were used to validate data and estimate free ridership and spillover effects.
to estimate the installation rate for each category of products. Finally, the participant survey was used to estimate the free ridership ratio and evaluate if the program had generated spillover. Ref.: 5725 17 Efficient Products – Multi-Un...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program, including the installation of energy-efficient products and the use of participant surveys to estimate free ridership and spillover effects. Five on-site visits were conducted in 2011 to assess program implementation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2 GROSS SAVINGS The quantities of products installed under the program are computed in the tracking sheet. For each product, ENSC uses a unitary savings estimation that is either...
AI summary This section discusses how Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) calculates energy savings from Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) installed under its residential programs. It references past evaluations and studies, including a 2009 evaluation of the Low Income program and the 2011 Ontario Power Authority report, to determine a unitary savings value of 41 kWh per CFL.
h saving should be equal to 2.4 h/day. This, in turn, corresponds to the daily usage of interior fixtures estimated from the telephone survey conducted in 2010 under the Retail Markdown Program (RMP). This value was revised by Econoler for...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings for CFLs under the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. It references a 2010 telephone survey and a 2011 study by the Ontario Power Authority to determine usage patterns and displaced wattage for different CFL models.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Econoler considers that the daily usage of 2.7 hours from Hydro-Québec’s metering study4 is more accurate. When available, metering data should always be prioritized instead of usin...
AI summary Econoler evaluates the energy savings of CFLs, prioritizing metering data over self-declaration estimates. For 13 watt CFLs, a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh is calculated. For 23 watt CFLs, an average displaced wattage of 70.5 W is used based on market data and ENERGY STAR equivalency tables.
a 23 watt CFL is sufficient to replace a 100 watt incandescent lamp. Thus, Econoler considers adequate using an average replaced wattage of 93.5 W resulting in an average displaced wattage of 70.5 W. As for 13 watt CFLs, the daily usage of...
AI summary The document discusses the energy savings of 23 watt CFLs and CFL torchieres in the context of the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. It references studies by Econoler and Navigant, and provides calculations for average displaced wattage and unitary savings values.
installation of LED nightlights. The assumptions behind this savings calculation are presented in the table below. Table 18: Unitary Savings Estimation for LED Nightlights Parameters Values Old Wattage (incandescent nightlights) 7W New Wat...
AI summary This section discusses the energy savings from replacing incandescent nightlights with LED nightlights under the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. The savings calculation assumes a displacement of 6.7 W per unit, with an annual savings of 26 kWh per unit.
d to replace old nightlights which are traditionally made of a 7 W incandescent light. Such replacement results in an average displaced wattage of 6.7 W, which is used by Econoler for this evaluation. The 12-hour/day operation time used by...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy savings of replacing traditional 7 W incandescent nightlights with LED versions, using a displaced wattage of 6.7 W and an average operating time of 12 hours per day. Econoler calculates a unitary savings value of 29.3 kWh for the LED nightlights installed under the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Programmable Thermostats Programmable thermostats were installed through the Nedco Homeowner pilot project. For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 63.15 kWh pe...
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of programmable thermostats installed through the Nedco Homeowner pilot project by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). The unitary savings value of 63.15 kWh per year is derived from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) report and considers temperature setbacks. A study by Hydro-Québec is also referenced for evaluating thermostat accuracy and temperature setbacks in different housing types.
Townhouse Gross Energy Savings for Electronic Thermostat Accuracy Percentage of savings due to the thermostat accuracy 9.0% 5.5% 4.5% Annual consumption for electric space heating (before 12,542 7,734 4,782 thermostat installation) [kWh] S...
AI summary The document presents data on energy savings from thermostat installations in townhouses, including savings percentages, annual consumption, and savings per thermostat. It also references evaluation reports on thermostat programs and includes citations from the U.S. Department of Energy and Econoler.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For the savings calculation due to the electronic thermostat accuracy, the percentages of savings were based on research supervised by Hydro-Québec’s laboratory of energy technologi...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses energy savings calculations from thermostat upgrades and a pilot project. It references research by Hydro-Québec’s LTE and billing analysis involving 25,703 clients. Econoler recommends using LTE test results and field data for more accurate savings estimates.
edco Homeowner pilot project was targeted at the residential sector. Econoler calculated an average unitary savings value based on the proportion of housing types in Nova Scotia’s residential market. Table 20: Unitary Savings Estimation fo...
AI summary The Nedco Homeowner pilot project targeted residential energy efficiency, with Econoler estimating average unitary savings based on housing types in Nova Scotia. Table 20 outlines savings from programmable thermostats across different housing types, including single-detached, duplex/triplex, and apartment units. The report also references Hydro-Québec's findings on energy savings from electronic thermostats.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Thus, the total unitary savings value associated with the installation of a programmable thermostat through the Nedco Homeowner pilot project is equal to 223 kWh per year. 4.2.5 Ele...
AI summary The report evaluates energy savings from various efficiency programs, including programmable thermostats, electric kettles, and faucet aerators, using unitary savings values derived from studies such as those by Navigant and OPA. These values are used in evaluations of programs like the Low Income Homeowner initiative.
Source 176.3 kWh OPA 159.1 kWh Wisconsin Focus on Energy Evaluation10 The annual unitary savings value presented in the table above is an average savings value per faucet, calculated from three faucets, one installed in the kitchen and two...
AI summary The document discusses unitary savings values for efficient products, specifically faucets and low-flow showerheads, referencing data from the OPA and other studies. The values are used in evaluations for the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
of data to review the unitary savings generated by the installation of low-flow showerheads. In the OPA report, the annual savings for low-flow showerheads are calculated using the assumptions below. Table 22: OPA Unitary Savings Estimate...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of annual energy savings from low-flow showerheads based on parameters provided by the OPA and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). It confirms that the assumptions used are reliable and conservative, and that the savings value of 377 kWh per household is consistent between the two sources.
d as a unitary savings value per low-flow showerhead. 11 Natural Resources Canada, Personal: Residential – Better Water Use Means Bigger Savings, www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca, date modified: 2009-06-26. Ref.: 5725 26 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps. It references savings values per unit installed, citing reports from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and the Ontario Power Authority, and highlights the use of unitary savings values based on past evaluations.
he Low Income Homeowner program. As a second source, Econoler consulted the OPA report. The 2011 version of the report looked into the installation of water heater blankets in the residential market. The annual unitary savings for both sin...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the Low Income Homeowner program and the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. It references the OPA report, which provides unitary savings estimates for energy-efficient products like water heater blankets and power bars with integrated timers.
Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Average Wattage 38.1 W 28 W 60 W 28 W Old Operating Time 9 h/day 14 h/day 6 h/day 11 h/day New Operating Time – with Timer 5 h/day 8 h/day 3 h/day 4 h/day Operating Season 12 months 12 months 8.5 months 8...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from power bars with integrated timers installed through the MURR program, based on assumptions and on-site visits. It also mentions the MURR program's appliance retirement component, which targeted room air conditioners and dehumidifiers, and notes the installation rate and potential for product removal.
the installation rate calculated from the five on-site visits conducted under the framework of this evaluation. Table 24: Percentage of Products Installed and Installation Rate Percentage of Installation Tracking Sheet – On-Site Visits – R...
AI summary The evaluation found that 100% of CFLs, faucet aerators, and low-flow showerheads were installed, but only 40% of power bars with timers were used effectively. The low usage of the timer on power bars reduces energy savings, and the issue could be addressed by providing more information to participants on how to use the timer.
ation to participants on how to use the timer on the power bar. To maintain measure sustainability, participants need to understand the necessity of using the timer to benefit from the energy savings. The on-site visits were scheduled main...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the need for more on-site visits to accurately determine the installation rate of power bars with timers in the MURR program. It also outlines the energy-to-demand ratio used to calculate demand savings for the program.
-to-demand ratio of 6.27 GWh/MW. This ratio was obtained from the adjusted 2011 program targets, by dividing the target energy savings by the target peak demand savings. 4.2.14 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each catego...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of revised gross savings from energy efficiency programs, including the MURR program and two pilot projects. It details energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, using a line loss factor of 1.1043. The savings are calculated based on revised unitary savings and account for different customer types, such as residential and commercial.
%) customers in the low-income renter market was similar to that found in the multi-unit renter market. Total gross energy and demand savings correspond to 0.903 GWh and 0.144 MW at the generator. Ref.: 5725 30 Efficient Products – Multi-U...
AI summary The evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011 discusses energy and demand savings from the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. It notes that energy savings were 0.903 GWh and demand savings were 0.144 MW at the generator level.
Power Hot Water 13 Watt 23 Watt CFL LED Programmable Electric Faucet Low-Flow Pipe Product Category CFLs CFLs Torchieres Nightlights Thermostats Kettles Aerators Showerheads Bars with Insulation Tank Timer Wraps Energy Savings Number of un...
AI summary The text presents a summary of energy-saving product installations across various categories, including CFLs, LED, programmable electric faucets, and low-flow aerators. It details the number of units installed through different initiatives, such as the MURR tracking sheet and the Nedco Homeowner pilot, and provides installation rates for each category.
1.1043 1.1043 Total Gross Demand Savings – at Generator 0.072 0.012 0.0001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.016 0.020 0.003 0.003 0.012 (MW) Ref.: 5725 31 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 201...
AI summary This section discusses the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures in the MURR program, specifically how replacing traditional lighting with CFLs affects heating and cooling loads in residential units.
ing products with CFLs causes an increase in the heating load during winter and a decrease in the cooling load during summer. Indeed, a CFL releases less heat than the less efficient lamp it replaces. For CFLs installed through the MURR pr...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of replacing traditional lighting products with CFLs on heating and cooling loads. It highlights that CFLs reduce heat output, affecting energy use in homes. An interactive effects factor of -18.5% is applied, based on a 1992 study for Hydro-Québec, and calculations are presented for different heating and air conditioning scenarios in Nova Scotia.
.0% No electric heating with air conditioning 67% × 18% = 12.1% 3.6% No electric heating without air conditioning 67% × 82% = 54.9 % 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor - -18.5% 12 DOE-2 is a widely used and accepted software building e...
AI summary The document presents statistical data on residential heating and air conditioning usage in Nova Scotia, along with references to energy efficiency studies and software tools used for building energy analysis. It also cites an evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the New Waterford and Nedco Homeowner pilot projects, interactive effects of -100 percent are considered during the he...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses the interactive effects of pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps in Nova Scotia. It calculates the impact during heating and cooling periods, considering the proportion of residences with electric heating and air conditioning. The weighted interactive effects factor for lighting products is -19.0 percent.
that the MURR program was new this year and was targeting multi-unit renters, which often represent customers that are less interested in energy efficiency, explains this low level of free-ridership. This result is in line with the survey...
AI summary The MURR program targets multi-unit renters, a group less likely to engage in energy efficiency. Survey results show that the program's free installation of energy-efficient products was a key factor in participation, with low free-ridership (17%). Internal spillover effects were also observed, as participants were influenced to purchase more energy-efficient products after program involvement.
cur when participants purchase eligible energy-efficient products following their previous participation in the program because of its influence, thereby demonstrating the advantages of such products. During the telephone survey, participa...
AI summary The evaluation report assesses the impact of the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by analyzing participant behavior, including whether they purchased additional energy-efficient products after initial participation and how much of the energy savings from these purchases can be attributed to the program.
pilot projects present several similarities with the MURR program; i.e., the typical energy-efficient products installed, the direct install approach and the targeted customers. 4.5 NET SAVINGS Net energy savings are estimated by adding th...
AI summary The document discusses the similarities between pilot projects and the MURR program, focusing on energy-efficient product installations, direct install approaches, and targeted customers. It outlines the calculation of net energy and demand savings using an equation incorporating gross energy savings, interactive effects, and the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR).
Power 13 Watt 23 Watt 23 Watt CFL LED Programmable Electric Faucet Low-Flow Pipe Hot Water Product Category CFLs CFLs Torchieres Nightlights Thermostats Kettles Aerators Showerheads Bars with Insulation Tank Wraps Timer Energy Savings Tota...
AI summary The document presents energy savings data for various power products, including CFLs, LEDs, and thermostats, along with interactive effects and net-to-gross ratios (NTGR). The data shows total gross and net energy savings at the meter and generator levels, as well as demand savings across different product categories.
0.050 (GWh) – at Generator Demand Savings Total Gross Demand Savings – 0.066 0.011 0.0001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.015 0.018 0.002 0.002 0.011 at Meter (MW) Interactive effects -18.5% -18.5% -18.5% -18.5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -19.0% -19.0% NTGR 0.83...
AI summary The document presents a comparison of tracked and evaluated energy savings from the MURR program and two additional pilot projects, including metrics such as demand savings, interactive effects, and net demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
lculations. > NTGR: There was a small difference between the evaluated NTGR of 0.83, which was estimated through the participant survey, and the NTGR of 0.85 used in the tracking sheet. Ref.: 5725 38 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residen...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It highlights adjustments to unitary savings values and the inclusion of interactive effects factors, which led to higher-than-expected energy and demand savings. The line loss factor used in the tracking sheet was also noted.
case. These parameters are usually based on past evaluation results, market intelligence, secondary research and other sources. The program manual should document these parameters so that the PM and the Evaluator can keep track of the assu...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of documenting program parameters in the program manual for tracking assumptions used in estimating program objectives. It also highlights the need to refine and disseminate marketing plans annually, including performance indicators for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, which likely discusses the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia.
Program 5. Monitor the gross savings directly in the tracking sheet: The performance of Tracking the tracking sheet could be improved by adding a table with the unitary savings Sheet value estimated for each product. That way, it would be...
AI summary The text outlines recommendations for improving the tracking sheet used in a program, including adding unitary savings values, establishing a validation protocol, and ensuring eligibility criteria are met by collecting all necessary information.
y source used for domestic hot water heating. This way, it will be possible to confirm that product replacements have only been made where domestic hot water is electrically heated. 8. Collect information for establishing base cases: The P...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for tracking product replacements and collecting data for evaluation purposes, including establishing base cases and line loss factors. It emphasizes the importance of detailed information collection for accurate evaluation of energy efficiency programs.
program be conducted in the future, Econoler recommends to collect the participants' rate codes in order to establish the line loss factor in a more precise way. Ref.: 5725 41 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Effi...
AI summary Econoler recommends collecting participants' rate codes to more accurately establish the line loss factor in the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011. It provides an analysis of the organization's programs and initiatives related to energy efficiency.
imer installed through the program. Therefore, an installation rate of 100 percent was used. However, since a significant number of sites visited did not use the timer with their power bar, Econoler recommends increasing the number of on-s...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program, focusing on the evaluation of educational materials for energy efficiency. It highlights the need for increased on-site visits due to low timer usage with power bars and outlines program theory and performance indicators.
he program. energy and its advantages. Analyzing the available educational material will allow an adequate selection for this category of customers. 2 This is a three-month pilot program in three Stating clearly the selection criteria for...
AI summary This document outlines a three-month pilot program in three municipalities aimed at promoting energy efficiency. It includes criteria for building selection, analysis of energy-efficient products, and the development of educational materials for landlords and tenants. The program will be implemented by a delivery agent, the Summerhill Group.
free of charge. 6 Program implementation will be done through Contract between ENSC and the Summerhill a delivery agent (Summerhill Group). Group. 7 Once the buildings are selected as well as the List of activities (educational, walk-throu...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program is implemented by a delivery agent, Summerhill Group, through a contract with ENSC. The program involves selecting buildings and products, followed by implementation activities such as educational sessions and product installations. Monthly reports are submitted for monitoring and evaluation, with the expected outcome being reduced utility bills.
n and control purposes. 9 The expected outcome is a reduction in the Tracking deemed savings associated with each bill for whomever is responsible. product. 10 In the medium term, one should expect an In future evaluations, persistence of...
AI summary The text discusses the expected outcomes of an energy efficiency program, focusing on reducing energy bills, increasing awareness, and addressing institutional barriers between landlords and tenants regarding energy use and product installation in multi-unit residential rental properties.
you provide information on what is their role in this program? This will help us to ask the appropriate question in the process evaluation survey. Q: Is there a reason why you selected 26 buildings? C: I understand that the energy audits w...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions and responses from an evaluation of the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Topics include program design, market transformation, energy savings calculations, and evaluation processes.
ons Please indicate your company name: Q1 - How would you define your role(s) as an ENSC energy efficiency program partner? Q1a – How long have you had that role (specify months or years)? Q1b - If you were a program partner before it chan...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at ENSC energy efficiency program partners regarding their roles, the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, their relationship with the Program Administrator, and any complaints received from program participants.
s for such a score? Reason(s): Q3 – Did you receive any complaint from participants in the program? Yes What was the complaint about? No Don’t Know Refused Not applicable Ref.: 5725 51 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Pro...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It includes survey questions about participant satisfaction, complaints, and suggestions for improvement.
ion report) and we hope that they will contribute to improving program performance. If we need to clarify some of your answers, we might call you back. Your name Date Phone number E-mail Ref.: 5725 54 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Reside...
AI summary This document is a participant survey questionnaire from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 evaluation report for the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. It aims to gather feedback from participants to improve program performance.
he energy efficiency of your house and to install CFL bulbs, power bars with timers, low flow showerheads or faucet aerators. Do you recall participating in this program? 1 Yes [CONTINUE] 2 No [PROMPT: “Are you sure? An event would have ta...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for participants in the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking if they recall participating in the program and providing prompts for clarification if they do not remember.
TO THEM AND REPEAT INTRODUCTION] No [THANK & TERMINATE] 4. Refused [THANK AND TERMINATE] The survey will take about fifteen minutes. Is this a good time for you? [IF REFUSED, ASK “Can we schedule a more convenient time for you to conduct t...
AI summary This text outlines a survey process conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation as part of the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program. It includes verification steps for property ownership, recall of program visits, and confirmation of installed energy efficiency measures.
mation is correct and that the measure was installed? [1=YES, INSTALLED, 2=NO, NOT INSTALLED, 98=DON'T KNOW, 99=REFUSED]? NOTE FOR PROGRAMMER: DO NOT PUT THE NUMBER OF EACH MEASURE a) CFL bulbs (CFLs 13W – CFLs 23W) b) Low flow showerheads...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for participants in the Multi-Unit Residential Program, asking about the installation of energy-efficient products and the reasons for participation, with a focus on energy cost savings and home evaluation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4. (To get expert’s advice about what upgrades to get/how to make house more energy efficient) 5. (To save energy—not further specified whether for cost, environment) 6. (To help th...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions from a 2011 evaluation report about participant motivations and concerns regarding an energy efficiency program. It includes questions about reasons for participation, concerns about joining, and overall satisfaction with the program.
fied were you overall with the program on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all satisfied’ and 5=‘very satisfied’? [RECORD NUMBER, DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE, 98 = Don’t know, 99 = Refused] Ref.: 5725 58 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Resid...
AI summary The text is part of a program evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes survey questions about customer satisfaction and reasons for dissatisfaction with the program, such as product suitability, energy evaluation duration, and customer preferences.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SM2. [ASK IF V2= 1] Has the information you received from the energy evaluation changed your behavior in terms of how you use energy at home? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refu...
AI summary The document presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 Evaluation Report, focusing on behavioral changes in energy use and barriers to action related to energy efficiency measures in multi-unit residential properties.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report B2. [ASK IF B1 = 1] Which measures did you choose to remove from your house? [READ ALL THAT WERE INSTALLED ‘YES’ IN V3a-d OR V4a-d]; [1 = YES, REMOVED 2 = NO, DID NOT REMOVE 98 = Do...
AI summary This text outlines a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on energy efficiency measures installed in homes and reasons for their removal. It includes questions about specific measures removed and the rationale behind their removal, as well as inquiries about uninstalled measures recommended by the Multi-Unit Residential Program.
ough the Multi-Unit Residential Program that you chose not to install or implement in your house? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 61 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia C...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on why participants chose not to install energy efficiency measures and instructions for data collection and analysis.
SUBSEQUENT SEQUENCES. START SECOND/SUBSEQUENT SEQUENCES BY SAYING: “AND NEXT. In the absence of the Program, would you have . . . DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE – POSE FR2M1 SEQUENCE IN ORDER/DO NOT RANDOMIZE FR2aM1 …installed the [MEASURE 1] that...
AI summary The text outlines a survey sequence for assessing the impact of the Multi-Unit Residential program on the installation of energy-efficient products, including follow-up questions about potential delays in installation without the program.
2011 Evaluation Report IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2ccM1 ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ: Would it have been within . . . 1. Less than 6 months? 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later? 3. 1 to less than 2 years later? 4. 2 to less t...
AI summary This text is from a 2011 evaluation report related to the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It contains survey questions about customer behavior, including whether respondents would have installed energy efficiency measures without the program and if they had prior plans to install them.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR2ccM2. You indicated in your previous response that if the Multi-Unit Residential program had not been available there was an [FR2cM2] in 10 likelihood that you would have install...
AI summary The text discusses the Multi-Unit Residential program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including questions about the timing of energy-efficient product installations and whether participants would have paid for the measures if they were not installed for free.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR4. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the importance of the Program as well as other factors that might have influenced your decision to install energy efficient measures through...
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate the importance of the Multi-Unit Residential program and other factors that influenced their decision to install energy-efficient measures, using a scale from 0 to 10.
important”, please rate the importance of each of the following in your decision to implement the energy-efficient products you installed through the Program. DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE Factor Responses (READ AND RANDOMIZE) a. The free installa...
AI summary The text asks participants to rate the importance of various factors in their decision to install energy-efficient products through the Program. It also inquires about additional energy-efficient measures or appliance retirements since participating in the Multi-Unit Residential Program.
d appliances on your own? 1. Yes 2. No [Go to D series] 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall) [Go to D series] 99. (Refused) [Go to D series] Ref.: 5725 67 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporati...
AI summary This text is part of a survey related to the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks participants whether they installed additional energy-efficient measures or retired old appliances after participating in the program and explores their use of other financing or rebate programs.
n or what appliances you have retired on your own after participating in the program. Did you install additional… POSE THE FOLLOWING IN ORDER – DO NOT RANDOMIZE SO4a. CFLs of any kind? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SO4b. Faucet aerators? 1...
AI summary The text contains a series of survey questions from an evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions focus on appliance installations and retirements by participants in the program.
98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) D10. [DO NOT READ] Gender 1. Male 2. Female [READ: THAT IS ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE FOR YOU. THANK AND TERMINATE.] Ref.: 5725 71 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary This document outlines an on-site visit protocol for the Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including sections for general information and details about the installation of CFLs (Twister) in residential buildings.
): W W W Number of units removed after installation: Explanation (contact declaration): Hours of use [hrs/day] (contact declaration): Ref.: 5725 72 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporati...
AI summary The document provides data collection forms for efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the installation and performance of efficient products such as power bars with timers and low-flow showerheads under the Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
ship level for the program corresponded to the weighted average of the final adjusted free-ridership levels calculated for each participant with the energy savings associated with each participant. Ref.: 5725 75 160, rue Saint-Paul, bureau...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on its impact and process evaluation from 2011. The program's ship level is tied to the weighted average of free-ridership levels and energy savings per participant.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation dated 2011. It likely provides an assessment of energy efficiency programs or initiatives undertaken during that period.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which likely outlines the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken during that year.
in Non-Residential Facilities 47 Table 27: Interactive Effects Factor for Hot Water Tank Wraps Installed in Individual Rental Units of Multi-Unit Buildings ...................................................................... 48 Table 28:...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Efficient Products-Direct Install (EP-DI) program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes interviews, on-site visits, and a survey of participants to evaluate the program's process and impact.
EP-DI) program. The 2011 evaluation was based on in-depth interviews with the Program Manager and one delivery agent, on 15 on-site visits as well as on a telephone survey of 70 program participants. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The EP-DI program prov...
AI summary The EP-DI program provides free installation of energy-efficient products to businesses and multi-unit residential buildings, aiming to overcome barriers to adoption. Initially launched in 2008 for small businesses, it expanded to larger businesses and institutions by 2011 and introduced new products to meet energy-saving targets, including a pilot for LED PAR lamps.
or this pilot program were 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps. The Efficient Products-Direct Install program aimed at achieving net electricity savings of 18.59 GWh and demand savings of 1.87 MW in 2011. Ref.: 5725 v Efficient Products – Direct I...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Efficient Products-Direct Install (EP-DI) program showed it achieved significant energy savings, with 4,595 projects completed. Awareness was primarily driven by in-person visits and phone calls from program representatives rather than marketing materials.
tant marketing tools to contact eligible businesses and promote the program. It also demonstrates that the use of promotional material was not intended as the main marketing strategy for this program. Very little promotional material was f...
AI summary The program has high participant satisfaction, with most expressing satisfaction with the overall program and its products. However, some participants faced issues with CFLs and installation barriers. Promotional material was limited, and program partners had concerns about its effectiveness.
ormation in general. It is to be noted that the addition of dimmable CFLs to the product list later in 2011 addresses some of the issues identified during the 2011 evaluation. Program Energy Savings To calculate the net savings of the EP-D...
AI summary The evaluation of the EP-DI program in 2011 calculated net savings by accounting for free-ridership and spillover effects, resulting in a net-to-gross ratio of 0.94. Combined with the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project, the program achieved 25.792 GWh in energy savings and 2.593 MW in demand savings.
s at the generator for the EP-DI program combined with the savings for the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project amounted to 25.792 GWh for energy savings and 2.593 MW for demand savings in 2011. Ref.: 5725 vii Efficient Products – Direc...
AI summary The evaluation report compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program and the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project in 2011. Combined energy savings amounted to 25.792 GWh and demand savings to 2.593 MW, with a combined net-to-generator ratio (NTGR) of 0.95.
MW 2.731 MW 0.95 2.593 MW NTGR of 0.94 for EPDI program and NTGR of 1 for Retail LED Direct Install pilot project. The combined NTGR value for all savings is 0.95. These net evaluated savings fell short of those tracked by ENSC. The adjust...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, noting that net evaluated savings were lower than tracked savings due to adjustments and interactive effects. Econoler recommends improving tracking sheets for better validation and data accuracy.
include marketing material addressing both partner and participant requests for better, more effective marketing as well as for further information on the program in general. EP-DI-R3. Require additional information during survey campaigns...
AI summary The text discusses the need for improved marketing and the collection of additional data during survey campaigns to enhance the accuracy of savings calculations for various energy efficiency measures, including hot water tank wraps, occupancy sensors, and thermostats. It also suggests increasing on-site visits for better evaluation.
ategory. This would allow for the collection of reliable information for these categories and the establishment of adjustment values that could be used to correct savings. Ref.: 5725 ix Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficienc...
AI summary The 2011 Efficient Products-Direct Install (EP-DI) program provided free installation of energy-efficient products to businesses and multi-unit residential buildings. The program expanded its product offerings in response to market saturation and participant feedback, including programmable thermostats and dimmable lamps.
hose were interested in having programmable thermostats installed. Moreover, one in five past participants was interested in replacing dimmable lamps. The eligible products in 2011 are the following: 1 13 Watt CFLs; 2 23 Watt CFLs; 3 LED e...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and delivered by Summerhill Group, expanded in 2011 to include all businesses and new products. The program promotes energy-efficient products like programmable thermostats and occupancy sensors, with outreach through local business associations and a call centre.
2011 Evaluation Report not previously available. In 2011, the program started in March and ran until the end of the year. From the end of November 2011 through December 2011, the EP-DI program included a pilot for LED parabolic aluminized...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the EP-DI program, which includes a pilot for LED PAR lamps in small retail businesses. The program aims to help businesses overcome barriers to energy efficiency, explain benefits, and transform market practices. The pilot project, managed by Nedco, targeted 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps.
11. These targets exclude savings for the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project. The EP-DI program generated net electricity savings of 25.23 GWh in 2010 and 39.52 GWh for 2008 and 2009 combined. Ref.: 5725 2 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary The text discusses the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program's electricity savings and evaluation methodology. It excludes savings from the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project and outlines the program's logic model and research strategy for the 2011 evaluation.
ting Program Information The first task in the process evaluation of the EP-DI program was the analysis of the program documentation. At that stage, all available program information was reviewed. Ref.: 5725 4 Efficient Products – Direct I...
AI summary The evaluation of the EP-DI program involved analyzing program documentation, conducting interviews with the Program Manager and Delivery Agent, and performing on-site visits. The process aimed to assess the program's effectiveness, barriers, and overall implementation.
ded, among other things, to understand the DA’s involvement in the program, their participation process in the program and their perception and satisfaction with the program. 2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November, 15 on-site visits were conduct...
AI summary The report discusses on-site visits conducted in November to assess the installation of EP-DI products. These visits were carried out by Equilibrium Engineering and involved evaluating the installation process and validating data from the tracking sheet. Some visits occurred during the installation, allowing for evaluation of the DA's data collection and communication with facility managers.
2011 Evaluation Report 3 PROCESS EVALUATION 3.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE PROCESS EVALUATION The process evaluation conducted under the EP-DI program focuses on one of ENSC’s evaluation objectives, which is “assessing the effectiveness...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the process evaluation of the EP-DI program, focusing on assessing the effectiveness of program design and delivery. The evaluation involved interviews with the Program Manager (PM) and the Director of Administration (DA), as well as a telephone survey of participants. The report also outlines the content of the program manual, including components such as program description, objectives, incentives, eligibility criteria, and savings calculations.
Furthermore, the content of all program manuals should be standardized based on the same template so that it is easier to locate specific sections or subjects. 3.3 PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of ENSC’s EP-DI progra...
AI summary The document discusses the need to standardize program manuals and reviews the EP-DI program tracking sheet, noting its usefulness for monitoring energy savings but highlighting missing data and inconsistencies in fields such as rate code and facility type.
rovided by participants. From this information, energy savings are calculated by the PM for 13 W and 23 W CFLs installed by the participant using the equation below when the information is available. Ref.: 5725 10 Efficient Products – Dire...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Direct Install Program's tracking sheet was evaluated and found to provide necessary information, though improvements are recommended, including removing unnecessary fields to enhance clarity and usability.
hat several fields in the tracking sheet are not required for program administration. Those fields are present even though they are not filled and should be removed for clarity purposes. > Ensure that all fields are filled in systematicall...
AI summary The text discusses improvements to the tracking sheet used in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, suggesting the removal of unnecessary fields and the systematic filling of required fields. It also highlights issues with missing rate code values and the need to improve the labelling of the usage group field to reduce the use of the 'Other' category.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.4 PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION Following the analysis of all program elements, and with the most up-to-date information about the program background and tools, the Evaluator...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report concludes that the EP-DI program is appropriate for the market, especially for small businesses that have not participated in energy efficiency programs due to various barriers. The program was upgraded in 2011, expanding its target market and product offerings.
itoring name is “Efficient Products Direct Install.” The Evaluator’s recommendation is to limit changing names as much as possible and use the same name in all contexts. 3.5 ENSC WEBSITE Customers can consult the ENSC website to find relev...
AI summary The text discusses the EP-DI program's website and product listings, noting discrepancies between the website and the program manual. It also highlights confusion caused by the transition of responsibilities from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC, along with challenges from mid-course modifications and resource constraints faced by sub-contractors.
eover, mid-course modifications require major changes to the way the DA operates and there have been complaints from the sub-contractor related to resource constraints due to additional scope changes. Satisfaction with the relationship bet...
AI summary The document discusses mid-course modifications to a program, highlighting complaints from sub-contractors about resource constraints due to scope changes. It also notes high satisfaction with the relationship between ENSC and sub-contractors, but emphasizes the need for better-defined program scope and improved advertising to enhance promotion.
2011 Sample Size 70 70 77 70 Previous participation 7% 6% 3% 40% Ref.: 5725 13 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.2 Program Awareness In 2011, the actions of program st...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report discusses program awareness for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It highlights that most participants learned about the program through direct interactions with ENSC staff or representatives, with in-person visits and phone calls being the primary methods of outreach.
ious program participant (16%). One in 10 learned about the program at an ENSC presentation (10%) or off the ENSC website (10%). Table 6: Program Awareness Program Awareness 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 70 77 70 PA/ENSC staff person...
AI summary The text discusses program awareness data from 2008 to 2011, highlighting how participants learned about the program through various channels, including in-person visits, phone calls, and presentations by ENSC staff. The data shows a significant increase in awareness through ENSC presentations and website visits in 2011.
0 <1 4 6 Don’t know 3 2 1 Multiple responses2 2 In assessing the source of program awareness, participants had historically been allowed to indicate only one response, representing the source of first contact with the program. In 2011, the...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program highlights that the primary motivation for participation was saving on energy costs, with 57% citing it as their first motivation and 34% as a secondary motivation. Environmental concerns were also a factor, though less prominent than in previous years.
gnificantly from 2010. Since saving on energy costs is the most important motivation for participating in the EP-DI program, program communications should continue to focus on energy bill savings. Ref.: 5725 15 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of focusing program communications on energy bill savings as the primary motivation for participation in the EP-DI program, highlighting the significance of cost savings for participants.
2008 2009 2010 2011 Second Most Important Second Second Second Most Most Most Most Most Motivation Most Most Most Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Motivation Motivatio Motivation Motivation Mo...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer motivations for participating in energy efficiency programs between 2008 and 2011. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs, with significant declines in the percentage of respondents citing this reason over time. Other motivations, such as environmental protection and taking advantage of incentives, were less frequently mentioned.
nvironment Reduce carbon 4 2 3 11 1 6 footprint Energy efficiency 9 Reduce 3 10 <1 13 1 maintenance costs Improve existing 3 9 5 4 1 lighting conditions Past program 1 participation Part of a green 1 initiative Assistance with 1 changing l...
AI summary The text presents a table with various categories related to energy efficiency and carbon reduction initiatives, including participation rates, maintenance cost reductions, and improvements in lighting conditions. It also includes responses such as 'refused' and 'don’t know' in relation to these initiatives.
3 Don’t know 1 10 5 33 3 29 21 Ref.: 5725 16 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from 2011 on the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It provides an analysis of the program's performance and outcomes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Compared to 2010, a significantly higher percentage of respondents reported having faced a challenge or barrier in installing the energy-efficient products provided through the prog...
AI summary A 2011 evaluation report found that 27% of respondents faced challenges in installing energy-efficient products provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, with 58% of those citing compatibility issues between the products and their existing equipment or installation.
ting up the power bar with integrated timer and a lack of information about the program as a barrier to participation. Table 8: Barriers Faced During Program Participation Barriers Faced 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 70 77 70 No 86% 7...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to program participation, citing a lack of information and difficulty in setting up the power bar with an integrated timer. It also highlights positive energy attitudes among participants, with most emphasizing the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs to their businesses.
70 92% 74 95% 70 99% Those giving a rating of 5 or 4 on a scale where 5= “Very satisfied” and 1= “Not at all satisfied” Don’t-knows removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 17 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses prior purchases of energy-efficient products by organizations participating in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It notes that two-thirds had previously purchased CFLs, but the program still increased CFL installations by replacing low-efficiency bulbs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.6 Program Influence Organizations were asked to rate the importance of program elements that might have influenced their decision to participate in the program and have energy-e...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the importance of program elements in influencing participation in energy efficiency programs. Free products and installation services were rated as highly important, with free installation being particularly significant for hot water tank wraps. The information provided during the initial contact with program representatives was also considered important.
initial contact with the program 7.3 8.1 7.0 representative 3.7.7 Future Energy Efficiency Actions The vast majority of respondents continued to report that they were likely to purchase energy-efficient products when installing or replacin...
AI summary The text discusses future energy efficiency actions, noting that most respondents are likely to purchase energy-efficient products in the future. It references a table showing trends in likelihood over several years and mentions an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
91% 51 89% 57 96% 53 85% Those giving a rating of 5 or 4 on a scale where 5= “Very satisfied” and 1= “Not at all satisfied” Don’t-knows removed from calculations When asked specifically about their satisfaction with products installed thro...
AI summary The text presents survey results showing high customer satisfaction with energy efficiency products installed through a program, with 78% satisfied with CFLs, 90% with hot water tank wraps, and all surveyed participants satisfied with programmable thermostats.
al of CFLs among surveyed participants was not used in the impact calculation (see Section 4.2.13 for additional details). Table 15: Removal of CFLs and LEDs
AI summary The text discusses the removal of CFLs and LEDs, noting that the overall number of CFLs among surveyed participants was not used in the impact calculation, with additional details provided in Section 4.2.13.
Products Removed 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 70 77 323 Did not remove any lighting 93% 88% 86% 63% Removed only CFLs 1 12 9% 38% Removed only LED exit lights 3 Removed some CFLs and some 1 <1 LEDs Don’t know 1 5 2008 2009 2010 2011...
AI summary The text presents data on the removal of lighting products from 2008 to 2011, including sample sizes and reasons for removal such as burned out bulbs, dimmer switch incompatibility, and energy savings. It highlights the prevalence of CFLs and LEDs being removed, with varying percentages across years.
T8s 1 To save energy 1 1 Doesn’t fit properly 2 Don’t know 1 1 1 2 2008 2009 2010 2011 Disposal of Removed Lights CFLs LEDs CFLs LEDs CFLs LEDs CFLs Sample Size 3 2 8 1 7 0 12 Threw away 1 4 6 Put in storage 2 1 6 2 3 Don’t know 1 1 1 1 2...
AI summary The text presents data on the disposal of removed lights, including CFLs and LEDs, across several years, with responses categorized into 'threw away,' 'put in storage,' 'don’t know,' and 'installed at another location.' It also includes a statistical note about the margin of error for the sample size and references an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.10 Participant Recommendations for Improvements One-half of respondents did not offer any suggestions for improving the program (51%). One in 10 mentioned more products and opti...
AI summary In the 2011 Evaluation Report, half of the respondents did not suggest improvements for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation program. Suggestions included offering more products, better marketing, and improved information. Six in 10 respondents believed a diagram illustrating the program steps would help future participants.
dual rental units of multi-unit residential buildings while the remainder corresponds to installations conducted in commercial buildings or in common areas of multi-unit residential buildings. In order to cover the main products installed...
AI summary The text discusses the categorization of energy-saving products installed in rental units and commercial buildings, with a focus on how site visits were allocated based on the percentage of total energy savings achieved by each product category. Categories with less than 1% of total savings did not receive on-site visits, despite some categories achieving higher savings post-sampling.
han 1 percent of total savings. Table 18: Total Number of Projects and Total Gross Energy Savings for Each Category of Products Installed – From Tracking Sheet Category of Products Installed Hot Water Power LED Exit Occupancy Programmable...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings from various product installations, categorizing them by type and showing the total number of projects, gross energy savings, and the percentage of total savings. Projects were sorted into two strata based on energy savings, with some categories having no projects above 10,000 kWh.
ings above 10,000 kWh. Thus, for those two categories, sites were selected randomly. However, for the CFL and programmable thermostat categories, several projects had savings in both strata. Ref.: 5725 24 Efficient Products – Direct Instal...
AI summary The Efficient Products – Direct Install Program conducted site visits in specific regions of Nova Scotia, selecting locations based on energy savings potential. Visits focused on installations of CFLs, programmable thermostats, and hot water tank wraps, with sites chosen randomly for some categories and based on savings data for others.
re conducted for sites where the following products were to be installed: > CFLs; > commercial & multi-unit residential buildings programmable thermostats; and > hot water tank wraps. On-Site Visit Protocols An on-site visit protocol listi...
AI summary The document outlines on-site visit protocols for installations of energy-efficient products such as CFLs, programmable thermostats, and hot water tank wraps. Protocols were developed to collect data on product types, usage, and facility operations. Gross savings were estimated using program tracking sheets and on-site visit data.
e location where the measure is implemented be collected by the DA for all buildings since savings can differ depending on whether measures are installed in common areas or in individual renter units. For each eligible product, a unitary s...
AI summary The document discusses how energy savings from efficient products, such as 13 W CFLs, are calculated based on installation location and usage patterns. Unitary savings values are applied depending on whether the product is installed in non-residential or residential buildings, with specific values adjusted for the 2011 evaluation.
ducts installed, for all the projects where this value was available in the tracking sheet. Based on the average old wattage value, the displaced wattage value was calculated using the equation below: 61.4 13.0 48.4 Hours of Operation In 2...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from 13 W CFLs installed in residential buildings, comparing different methods and assumptions used by ENSC and Econoler. It highlights differences in unitary savings values and the basis for these calculations, including the use of average hours of operation and historical data from evaluations.
aving should be equal to 2.4 h/day. This, in turn, corresponds to the daily usage of interior fixtures estimated from the telephone survey conducted in 2010 under the Retail Markdown Program (RMP). Ref.: 5725 27 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of displaced wattage and energy savings for 13 watt CFLs under the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It references a 2010 telephone survey, ENERGY STAR equivalency data, and a Hydro-Québec metering study to determine usage hours and savings.
rate to use the daily usage of 2.7 hours from Hydro-Québec’s metering study. Unitary Savings Calculation The review resulted in a unitary savings value for 13 watt CFLs of 46.3 kWh, as shown below. 60 13 2.7 365 46.3 1000 5 For more detail...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings calculation for 13 W and 23 W CFLs in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It notes a revised value for 13 W CFLs and provides separate values for 23 W CFLs in non-residential and residential buildings, citing a lack of detail in the 2010 evaluation report.
in residential buildings, the daily usage of 23 watt CFLs was adjusted to 2.7 hours, based on a metering study conducted for Hydro-Québec’s residential lighting program. Unitary Savings Calculation The review resulted in a unitary savings...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings calculation for 23 watt CFLs in residential buildings, adjusting daily usage to 2.7 hours based on a metering study. It also covers the savings value for chandelier CFLs, citing the OPA Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report and noting adjustments made by Econoler using tracking sheet data.
as established for residential buildings. Econoler revised this savings value using the information available in the tracking sheet, covering projects completed by September 2011. Displaced Wattage The displaced wattage value was establish...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of displaced wattage and unitary savings for chandelier CFLs in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, using data from the tracking sheet and information provided by site contacts. The unitary savings value was revised to 118.0 kWh per year for 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Dimmable CFLs For dimmable CFLs, ENSC used a unitary savings value of 123 kWh for each 14 W dimmable CFL installed in non-residential buildings and 41 kWh for each dimmable CF...
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of dimmable CFLs by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in 2011, including the unitary savings value, displaced wattage, and hours of operation used in the calculation. The data was based on information from the tracking sheet and site contacts.
52.4 9.90 365 189.3 1000 The EP-DI 2011 impact evaluation revised the unitary savings value for chandelier CFLs installed in non-residential buildings to 189.3 kWh per year. 14 W Dimmable CFLs Installed in Residential Buildings The 41 kWh...
AI summary The document evaluates the unitary savings value for 14 W dimmable CFLs installed in residential buildings, adjusting for displaced wattage and hours of operation. It references a prior evaluation for 13 W CFLs and uses data from Hydro-Québec's metering study.
a metering study conducted for Hydro-Québec’s residential lighting program. Unitary Savings Calculation The review resulted in a unitary savings value for 14 watt CFLs of 45.3 kWh, as shown below. 60 14 2.7 365 45.3 1000 4.2.5 LED Exit Sig...
AI summary The document discusses unitary savings calculations for energy efficiency programs, including 14 watt CFLs and LED exit signs. It highlights discrepancies in data sources and methods used to calculate displaced wattage values for these programs.
A is 2.4 W. Based on the average old wattage value, the displaced wattage value was calculated using the equation below. 38.8 2.4 36.4 Ref.: 5725 33 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evalua...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for LED exit signs and power bars with integrated timers under the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It references data from the OPA and Navigant Consulting, and provides specific kWh values for energy savings.
ucing the standby power consumption of electronic devices plugged into the power bar. Table 19 presents the data used by the OPA to calculate the unitary savings for power bars with integrated timer. Table 19: Unitary Savings Calculation f...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings calculation for power bars with integrated timers, as calculated by the Ontario Power Authority. These power bars account for a small portion of the Efficient Products – Direct Install program's total savings, leading to no site visits being conducted for this category.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Average Energy Savings The 2011 OPA Quasi-Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report7 presents energy savings for hot water tank wrap installations in different types of commercia...
AI summary The 2011 OPA Quasi-Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report provides energy savings data for hot water tank wraps in various commercial sectors. The average annual savings across all sectors is 1.80 kWh/L of tank capacity, with specific values provided for different sectors such as office, food retail, schools, restaurants, and lodging.
2.10 Lodging 1.74 Average Annual Savings 1.80 Hot Water Tank Volume The OPA report shows the hot water tank volume for different types of commercial facilities. The average hot water tank size based on this information is 380 L (100 gal)....
AI summary The document discusses the discrepancy between the average hot water tank volume reported by the OPA and data from on-site visits. It highlights that the OPA's average is based on a larger dataset, while on-site visits showed smaller tanks. The EP-DI program does not set a minimum tank size for insulation, and the Evaluator recommends collecting more detailed data on tank volumes for better energy savings estimates.
product. 7 Ontario Power Authority (OPA), “2011 Quasi Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions,” http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/evaluation-measurement-and-verification/measures-assumptions-lists. Ref.: 5725 36 Efficient Products – Direct Ins...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program, including the unitary savings calculation for hot water tank wraps in residential and non-residential buildings. It references the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) report and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) impact evaluations.
mate this unitary savings value are clear, well documented and reliable, Econoler used the unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for this evaluation. 4.2.8 Commercial Programmable Thermostats For commercial programmable thermostats, EN...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings value for commercial programmable thermostats used in the EP-DI program. ENSC uses a value of 1,098 kWh per unit, based on data from the Massachusetts Technical Reference Manual and Statistics Canada. However, on-site visits revealed that the controlled space area is significantly lower than assumed, suggesting a potential overestimation of savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Based on these values, the unitary savings value for commercial programmable thermostats used in the 2011 evaluation is calculated, as indicated below. 0.119 212 25.23 For future ev...
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of commercial programmable thermostats in 2011 and recommends using the OPA's approach for future evaluations, which involves collecting detailed data on building types, thermostat usage, and heating systems.
at the facility before the retrofit and inquire on the use of manual nighttime setback with the old thermostat. 4.2.9 Programmable Thermostats for Individual Rental Units of Multi-Unit Buildings For programmable thermostats, ENSC uses a un...
AI summary The document discusses the use of programmable thermostats in multi-unit buildings, referencing a unitary savings value of 63.15 kWh per year derived from the OPA report. Econoler revised this value based on the Retail Markdown program evaluation, questioning the 1% savings per degree setback from the U.S. Department of Energy.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Fahrenheit and not to degree degree-Celsius like the OPA did. The percentage of savings per degree- Celsius of setback should be higher than for degree-Fahrenheit. Moreover, based o...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 evaluation report discusses thermostat efficiency, comparing Fahrenheit and Celsius savings calculations and suggesting alternative data sources. It highlights differences in baseline thermostats between Nova Scotia and Ontario, noting that bimetallic thermostats are more common and that electronic thermostats offer greater energy savings. The report references Hydro-Québec's evaluation of residential electronic thermostats.
used for programmable thermostats. This study estimated the energy savings generated by the thermostat accuracy and by the temperature set back. The Table 21 presents the results of this evaluation. Table 21: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec...
AI summary This text discusses an evaluation of energy savings from programmable thermostats conducted by Hydro-Québec. It highlights the percentage of savings attributed to thermostat accuracy and temperature setback, along with key metrics such as annual consumption and savings per thermostat.
tation: 2012-01-11. 11 Econoler, “Évaluation du programme thermostats électroniques – Volet nouvelle construction au marché résidentiel,” Final Report presented to Hydro-Québec, February 9, 2009. Ref.: 5725 39 Efficient Products – Direct I...
AI summary This report evaluates the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by analyzing the energy savings from electronic thermostats. Savings calculations are based on research by Hydro-Québec’s laboratory and billing analysis involving thousands of clients. The unitary savings value of 179 kWh per year is determined and used for the 2011 impact evaluation of the RMP.
t. Thus, the total unitary savings value associated with the installation of a programmable thermostat is equal to 179 kWh per year. This value will be used in the 2011 impact evaluation of the RMP. 4.2.10 Occupancy Sensors For occupancy s...
AI summary The report evaluates the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, noting that the unitary savings value for programmable thermostats is 179 kWh per year and for occupancy sensors is 391 kWh per unit. No on-site visits were conducted for occupancy sensors due to their low impact, but recommendations are made for future evaluations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.11 Dishwasher Spray Valves For dishwasher spray valves, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 2,500 kWh per year. This value is based on two studies conducted by Veritec Consulti...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses energy savings from dishwasher spray valves and LED PAR lamps. ENSC uses an average savings value of 2,500 kWh/year for dishwasher spray valves based on studies from Calgary and Waterloo. For the Retail LED Direct Install pilot, 254 installations used 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps with savings values of 244 kWh and 292 kWh, respectively.
s. A total of 254 installations were conducted under the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project. Unitary savings values of 244 kWh and 292 kWh are used for 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps, respectively. These unitary savings are calculated ba...
AI summary The Retail LED Direct Install pilot project conducted 254 installations using 14 W and 17 W LED PAR lamps, with unitary savings values of 244 kWh and 292 kWh, respectively. These savings were based on replacing 70 W and 90 W halogen lamps and adjusting for actual replacements. The total gross energy savings for the project was 4.27 GWh.
installed through the pilot project. The total gross energy savings value for the pilot project is 4.27 GWh. Table 22: Gross Savings for Retail LED Direct Install Pilot Project Adjustment for Total Gross Number of Units Unitary Savings Exi...
AI summary The document provides details on the installation and energy savings from a Retail LED Direct Install Pilot Project, including a table showing the number of units installed, unitary savings, and total gross energy savings of 4.27 GWh. It also discusses the installation rate and discrepancies between installed products and tracking sheet data.
s different from the information in the savings tracking sheet. The installation rate is the ratio between the number of products installed and the number of products identified in the tracking sheet. The installation rate was found to be...
AI summary The evaluation found a 100% installation rate for most products, except for CFLs, where only 65.7% was achieved due to limited on-site visits. An error margin of 28% was identified for CFLs, making the rate too unreliable to use for savings adjustments. No on-site visits were conducted for occupancy sensors, power bars, and dishwasher spray valves, resulting in a 100% installation rate for these categories.
r rate class with the corresponding line loss factor value provided by Nova Scotia Power. It results in total gross energy and demand savings estimated at 29.995 GWh and 3.017 MW at the generator. Ref.: 5725 43 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary The text discusses a rate class associated with a line loss factor provided by Nova Scotia Power, resulting in estimated energy and demand savings. It also references an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 23: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings Dimmable Hot Water Programmable Dishwas 13 W CFLs 23 W CFLs Power Retail LED Chande CFLs LED Tank Wraps Thermostats Oc...
AI summary This document presents an evaluation of energy and demand savings from various efficiency programs, including the use of CFLs, hot water tank wraps, programmable thermostats, and other energy-efficient products. The focus is on quantifying the impact of these initiatives on energy consumption.
Energy Savings Number of Units 47,818 96,762 5,988 6,903 12,343 10,956 1,396 1,814 1,724 3,814 2,153 6,816 968 3,502 37 15,836 Unitary 150.7 46.3 270.0 69.5 118.0 189.3 45.3 318.9 53.1 684.0 270.0 25.2 179 391.0 2500.0 - savings (kWh) Inst...
AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings data, including the number of units, unitary savings, installation rates, and total gross energy and demand savings at both meter and generator levels. The data spans multiple categories and includes line loss factors.
Gross Demand Savings 0.796 0.495 0.179 0.053 0.160 0.229 0.007 0.064 0.010 0.288 0.064 0.019 0.019 0.152 0.010 0.472 – at Generator (MW) Ref.: 5725 44 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Eval...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses interactive effects in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, noting that while ENSC does not account for them in net savings calculations, they were considered in the program evaluation. These effects occur when energy efficiency measures impact heating and cooling systems, increasing winter heating loads and decreasing summer cooling loads.
k wraps cause an increase in the heating load during winter and a decrease in the cooling load during summer. Interactive effects values were calculated for non-residential and residential facilities. For all lighting products (CFLs, LED e...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of lighting products and occupancy sensors on heating and cooling loads in non-residential facilities, citing a 1992 study by ADS for Hydro-Québec that used the DOE2 software to simulate these effects in electrically heated buildings.
collected during the C&I telephone survey campaigns conducted by ENSC, and from each participant of the EP-DI program. This would provide for a better evaluation of the interactive effects factor. Ref.: 5725 45 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program, focusing on the interactive effects factor for lighting products and occupancy sensors in non-residential facilities. Data was collected from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and EP-DI program participants to assess these effects.
5.7% No electric heating without air conditioning 23.53% 0.0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor - -7.7% For lighting products installed in individual rental units of multi-unit residential buildings, the same approach was used to calcula...
AI summary The text calculates the interactive effects factor for lighting products in rental units of multi-unit residential buildings in Nova Scotia, considering factors like electric heating and air conditioning usage. The weighted interactive effects factor is determined as -18.5% based on data from ENSC and Statistics Canada.
onditioning, Nova Scotia, 2009. 17 ADS ASSOCIÉS, “Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale,” report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. Ref.: 5725 46 Efficient Products – Direct I...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects factor for hot water tank wraps in non-residential buildings and multi-unit residential buildings, considering heating and cooling seasons in Halifax. It highlights the use of -100% and +100% factors based on temperature control and seasonal energy use.
its in multi-unit residential buildings. Table 26: Interactive Effects Factor for Hot Water Tank Wraps Installed in Non-Residential Facilities % of Non- Interactive Effects Interactive Effects Parameters Residential During Heating Period D...
AI summary The text discusses the Interactive Effects Factor for Hot Water Tank Wraps installed in non-residential facilities, including percentages and calculations for different heating and cooling scenarios. It also references an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 27: Interactive Effects Factor for Hot Water Tank Wraps Installed in Individual Rental Units of Multi-Unit Buildings % of Interactive Effects Interactive Effects Parameters Re...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation presents a table analyzing the interactive effects factor for hot water tank wraps installed in individual rental units of multi-unit buildings, showing different percentages based on heating and cooling periods.
- -19.0% The gross savings at the meter including interactive effects are presented in the table below. Table 28: Gross Savings at the Meter – Including Interactive Effects Savings for Unitary Rental Units of Savings for Non-Residential Bu...
AI summary The table presents gross energy and demand savings at the meter for the EP-DI program, including interactive effects. After applying interactive effects, the total gross energy savings were estimated at 24.737 GWh, and demand savings at 2.487 MW.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report This value is used for all products installed through the EP-DI program. However, this value cannot be used for products installed under the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project....
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the calculation of net savings for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's programs. It uses the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) to adjust gross savings for the EP-DI program and the Retail LED Direct Install pilot project. Net energy savings were estimated at 25.792 GWh and net demand savings at 2.593 MW for 2011.
35.678 GWh 35.678 GWh 0.83 29.435 GWh Evaluation Results 29.995 GWh 29.995 GWh 27.161 GWh 0.95 25.792 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 3.589 MW 3.589 MW 3.589 MW 0.83 2.961 MW Evaluation Results 3.017 MW 3.017 MW 2.731 MW 0.95...
AI summary The evaluation of the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program in 2011 found that net energy savings were slightly lower than tracked savings, primarily due to adjustments in unitary savings values and interactive effects factors. The Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) was revised upward for certain programs but did not fully offset the impact of these adjustments.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency initiatives and programs.
e evaluation methodology as well as the pre- and post-data required to apply the selected methodology. 9. Standardize the program name across all channels: Econoler understands that the program name should reflect its nature and that ENSC...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for standardizing the name of the Efficient Products – Direct Install (EP-DI) program, ensuring all 10 products are listed on the ENSC website, and emphasizing energy bill savings as a key motivator for program participation.
on Perspectives energy costs is the most important motivation for participating in the EP-DI program, program communications should continue to focus on energy bill savings. Ref.: 5725 53 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficie...
AI summary The text highlights that energy cost savings is the primary motivation for participation in the EP-DI program, suggesting that program communications should emphasize energy bill savings. It references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the EP-DI program in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, summarizing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken during that period.
ions, the Evaluator recommends that the DA collect information on the hot water tank volume. This will help provide a better estimate of energy savings for this product. 16. Collect additional information for each room where a commercial p...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends collecting additional data on hot water tank volumes and room-specific thermostat settings to improve energy savings estimates. On-site visits are also recommended to determine the wattage and operating hours of lamps connected to occupancy sensors, with a minimum load criterion of 105 W for each occupancy sensor installation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Impact 18. Collect information on dishwasher spray valve usage: Since no on-site visit Evaluation was conducted for dishwasher spray valves, no indication on the usage hours is avai...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation highlights the need for improved data collection methods in energy efficiency programs, such as on-site monitoring for dishwasher spray valves and increased on-site visits for CFL installations. It also recommends collecting information on heating sources and air conditioning use during telephone surveys and program participation to better assess program effectiveness.
One-quarter of respondents (26%) report that energy costs are between 20 and 29 percent of the annual operating budget. Table 30: Energy Costs as a Percent of Annual Operating Budget Energy Costs as a Percent of Respondents Annual Operatin...
AI summary The text highlights that 26% of respondents report energy costs between 20 and 29% of their annual operating budget, with data provided in Table 30 showing trends from 2008 to 2011. It also references an evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The majority of respondents in the 2011 sample were concentrated in a few business types including lodging (25%), retailers (17%), food service (11%), service (7%), and recreation (...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation highlights that the majority of respondents were from specific business types, with lodging accounting for 25% of the sample.
Manufacturing 2 Other/Missing (Count) 4 3 16 Ref.: 5725 57 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Six in 10 2011 respondents (60%) have fewer than five full time employees, and...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program discusses the size and structure of participating businesses, noting that 60% have fewer than five full-time employees and 81% are independent businesses not part of a larger company.
5 3 Eight in 10 (81%) of 2011 respondents reported that their businesses were independent and not part of a larger company. Table 33: Type of Company Respondents Type of Company 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 70 77 70 Independent 69% 7...
AI summary The Direct Install Program (C&I) has undergone multiple name changes, including Small Business Energy Solution and Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, raising questions about the reasons for these changes.
Since this a new program, did you have an evaluation plan designed at the same time the program was designed? Q: Will there be a detailed program marketing strategy along with performance indicators? Q: How would you rate the facility or d...
AI summary The text outlines a questionnaire for partners in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, asking about their role, experience, and perception of the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes instructions for completing the form and provides contact information for submission.
u had that role (specify months or years)? Q1b - If you were a program partner before it changed status and name from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, how was this transition perceived in the market? Not applicable Unnoticed Some confusion A...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, the impact on program partners, and participant complaints related to the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It also references an evaluation report from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On...
AI summary The document contains a 2011 evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes survey questions about program participation, satisfaction, and suggestions for improvement, as well as questions about prior evaluations and marketing outreach.
uires minor changes to the way you work Requires major changes to the way you work No opinion Q14- Did you receive any complaints from other parties involved in the delivery of that program? Yes: If yes, which party was that? (Please do no...
AI summary This text is from a participant survey questionnaire for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions about complaints, barriers to program implementation, and participant contact information.
EFFICIENT PRODUCTS – DIRECT INSTALL PROGRAM October 7, 2011 Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] Hello, my name is from CRA (Corporate Research Assoc...
AI summary This text is part of a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Direct Install Program. The survey aims to gather feedback from participants regarding their experience with the program, which involves the free installation of energy-efficient products.
call V1. Our records indicate that your organization participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Direct Install Program. Is this correct? 1. Yes (Go to V3) 2. No Ref.: 5725 68 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions directed at an organization regarding its participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Direct Install Program, including whether they participated in other energy efficiency programs prior to this one.
ticipating P1. Did your organization participate in any other Efficiency Nova Scotia or Nova Scotia Power energy efficiency programs before participating in the Direct Install Program? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to P4) 98. (Don’t know) (Go to P4) 99...
AI summary This text is a form used to gather information about an organization's participation in energy efficiency programs, specifically asking whether they participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia or Nova Scotia Power programs prior to the Direct Install Program and which ones.
2004 7. 2005 8. 2006 9. 2007 10. 2008 11. 2009 12. 2010 13. 2011 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) P4. How did you learn about the Direct Install Program? [RANDOMIZE AND READ 1-9, THEN READ CODE 96] [ACCEPT MULTIPLE RESPONSES] 1. From a phone...
AI summary The text presents a survey question about how participants learned about the Direct Install Program, including various methods such as phone calls, visits, literature, and word of mouth. It also references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the 2011 program.
2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) P5. What was the SINGLE most important reason your organization chose to participate in the program? (Do not read) 1. (To take advantage of program incentives) 2. (To see what else I should be doing as...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the reasons for participating in an energy efficiency program, with options such as taking advantage of incentives, reducing energy costs, and environmental concerns. Some responses are marked as 'Don’t know' or 'Refused'.
rint) 7. (To help protect the environment) 8. (To replace non-working equipment) 9. (Recommended by utility account rep) 10. (Recommended by contractor) Ref.: 5725 71 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpo...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including reasons for participation and verification of installations such as CFLs and hot water tank wraps.
TANKWRAP = 1] Do you recall having hot water tank wrap installed through the Direct Install Program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) (If No: VA2a Are you sure? According to our records, you had hot water tank wrap installed for...
AI summary The text contains survey questions from an evaluation of the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It asks respondents if they recall having hot water tank wraps and thermostats installed through the program and includes follow-up questions based on their responses.
IFIED IN VA1-VA3, CHOOSE AT RANDOM TWO MEASURES VERIFIED IN VA1-VA3. THE RESPONDENT WILL ANSWER ACCORDING TO THESE TWO MEASURES THROUGHOUT THE QUESTIONNAIRE WHEN IDENTIFIED LIKE SO: [MEASURE 1 or 2].) (Note: IF THERE ARE TWO MEASURES VERIF...
AI summary The text outlines a questionnaire for participants in the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, focusing on previous purchases and the removal of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) installed through the program. Respondents are asked to answer based on specific energy-efficient measures verified in VA1-VA3.
of the Direct Install Program? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to FR1) 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall (Go to FR1)) 99. (Refused) (Go to FR1) (ASK IF IC1 = 1) IC4. What was the SINGLE main reason you removed the compact fluorescent light bulb(s) from servic...
AI summary This section of the document outlines a survey related to the removal and disposal of compact fluorescent light bulbs under the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program. It includes questions about the reasons for removal and what participants did with the bulbs.
tion,” and a 10 indicating that you “Definitely Would Have Taken the Action.” In the absence of the Program, would you have . . . DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE – POSE FR2M1 SEQUENCE IN ORDER/DO NOT RANDOMIZE FR2aM1. … installed exactly the same en...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program, specifically asking respondents about their likelihood of installing energy-efficient lighting products without the program and the potential delay in installation.
er) 3. (At the same time) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2ccM1 ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ: Would it have been within . . . 1. Less than 6 months? 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later 3. 1 to less t...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the installation of energy-efficient products through the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks respondents about the timing of installation and whether they would have paid for the measure if it had not been installed for free.
RANDOMIZE) _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 a. Free [MEASURE 1] Refused b. Free Installation services _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused c. Information received during the initial contact by the program _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 repres...
AI summary The text outlines a survey questionnaire focused on participant behavior related to energy efficiency measures, specifically asking about prior plans and likelihood of taking action without the Direct Install Program. It includes response options and instructions for interviewers.
n,” and a 10 indicating that you “Definitely Would Have Taken the Action.”. In the absence of the Program, would you have . . . DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE – POSE FR2M2 SEQUENCE IN ORDER/DO NOT RANDOMIZE Ref.: 5725 78 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary The text outlines a series of survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on participant behavior in the absence of the program and the timing of installations.
ever) 3 (At the same time) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2cc ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ: Would it have been within . . . 1. Less than 6 months? 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later 3. 1 to less th...
AI summary The text is part of an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It includes survey questions about customer responses to the program, including whether they would have installed energy-efficient products without the program and the importance of various factors in their decision.
-efficient products you installed through the Program. DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) (a) Performance of Measure _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 a. Free [MEASURE 2] Refused b. Free Installation services _ Response _98 Don’...
AI summary This section of the evaluation report asks participants about additional energy-efficient measures installed after participation in the Direct Install Program. It includes questions about spillover effects and whether the organization installed additional measures on its own.
ficient measures on its own for this facility. Is that correct? 1. Yes SO3 2. No Go to S1 98. (Don’t know) Go to S1 99. (Refused) Go to S1 Now, I will specifically talk about the additional energy-efficient measures your company installed...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to energy-efficient measures implemented by a company after participating in the Direct Install Program, including whether additional measures were taken, if they benefited from other financing or rebates, and what specific measures were implemented.
1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SO4e. L-E-D Exit Signs? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SO4f. Intelligent power bars with timers? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SO4g. Other energy-efficient measures? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) Ref.: 5725 82...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Direct Install Program, specifically regarding the influence of the program on the installation of energy-efficient products and overall satisfaction with the program's aspects.
2011 Evaluation Report S3_M2. [IF S2_M2 = 4 OR 5] Why are you not satisfied with the [MEASURE 2]? [MULTIPLE MENTION, DON’T READ LIST] Light Quality for CFLs 1. (Bulb is too bright) 2. (Bulb is not bright enough) 3. (Don’t like the overall...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses dissatisfaction with Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) and Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) based on factors like light quality, function, performance, and physical limitations. It also includes a survey question about future purchasing likelihood of energy-efficient products.
ency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Section B. Barriers to Action & Recommendations for Improvements B1. Were there any challenges or barriers that your organization faced in implementing the energy efficiency measures prov...
AI summary The text presents a section from an evaluation report discussing barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures. It asks respondents to identify the most significant challenges they faced, with options including concerns about savings, lack of information, and financing issues.
er) 96. (Other (Specify: _)) 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall) 99. (Refused) B3. What was the SECOND most important barrier? (Do not read) 1. (Concern that actual bill savings would be less than estimated) 2. (Lack of information to make an in...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about barriers to energy efficiency programs and asks respondents to rate the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs. It includes options for answering and a reference to an evaluation report.
’t recall] B5. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all important’ and 5=‘very important’, how important is managing energy costs to your organization? [98 = Don’t know/Don’t recall] B6. Approximately, what percent of your annual operatin...
AI summary The text presents survey questions aimed at understanding the importance of energy costs to organizations, the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs, and feedback on improving the Direct Install Program. It also asks about the potential benefit of a visual guide for program participation.
Not at all 96. (Depends on what the figure or illustration would have been) 97. (This kind of document already exists) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 87 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporat...
AI summary The text is a section from an evaluation report about the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on the hours of operation of a facility located at a service address. It asks respondents to provide operating hours for each day of the week and whether the business is closed for specific periods of the year.
re specific periods of the year that your business is closed? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to F1) 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall (Go to F1) 99. (Refused) (Go to F1) Ref.: 5725 88 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpora...
AI summary The text includes a question about business closure periods and a section on firmographics, specifically asking about the main activity of the facility where energy efficiency improvements were implemented. It is part of an evaluation report for an energy efficiency program.
What is the main activity of the facility where the energy efficiency improvements were implemented? [DO NOT READ—BUT CONFIRM WITH RESPONDENT THAT THE CATEGORY YOU CHOOSE IS CORRECT] 1. Education 2. Food Sales (grocery) 3. Food Service (re...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to energy efficiency improvements, including the primary activity of the facility and the number of full-time equivalent workers employed there. It is part of an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
6. 100 to 249 7. 250 or More 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall) 99. (Refused) F4. Is your organization independent, or part of a larger organization or company? 1. Independent 2. Part of a larger organization or company 96. Other ( _) 98. (Don’...
AI summary This document outlines the on-site visit protocols for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including details on site observation, data collection, and follow-up information.
ing schedule reported by the site contact operation schedule (hours per as usage could vary for each section of the facility. Use additional sheets if day): necessary. Schedule Lighting # Monday Tuesday Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. Sun. Holidays sc...
AI summary The document provides a template for reporting lighting schedules and includes information about the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It outlines how to record operating hours and details for lighting measures, including the use of CFLs.
nc. Halogens CFLs Number – Existing equipment (Contact Declaration): Inc. Halogens CFLs Number – CFL 13 W installed (From database): Number – CFL 13 W installed (On-site validation): Power – Existing lighting [W] (From database): Inc. Halo...
AI summary The text provides a form for reporting on existing lighting equipment, including the number of CFLs installed, power consumption, hours of use, and validation of lamp status. It is part of an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
corresponding heating system number for this section (Site validation/Contact declaration): Validate that all lamps are still installed and not burnt. If some are burnt or missing, indicate how many: When were the lamps removed or when did...
AI summary This document is a form used to validate the installation and status of CFL 23 W lamps. It asks about the number of lamps installed, whether they are still functional, and whether they will be replaced. The form is part of an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
CFL 23 W Power – Existing lighting [W] (Contact Declaration/On site validation): Inc. Halogens CFLs Hours of use per year (From database): Hours of use for equipment: Indicate the corresponding schedule number for each section (Contact dec...
AI summary The document outlines a form for validating existing lighting systems, including CFLs, and provides information about the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for lighting power, hours of use, and verification of lamp status.
th Dimmable CFLs to be validated please fill this section of the form (make copies if necessary). Measure location: Date of installation (From database): Date of installation (Contact Declaration): Number – Existing equipment for this faci...
AI summary This form is used to validate the installation of dimmable CFLs as part of the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It collects data on existing lighting equipment, installation dates, power usage, dimming settings, and hours of use for program evaluation purposes.
va Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Dimmable CFLs Indicate the corresponding cooling system number for this section (Site validation/Contact declaration): Percent of the time when both lighting and heating are ON in this section (...
AI summary This document is a 2011 evaluation report for a facility that includes sections for validating the installation and status of dimmable and candelabra (chandelier) CFLs. It includes fields for logging installation dates, verifying lamp status, and noting any missing or burnt lamps.
c. Halogens CFLs Power – Existing lighting [W] (Contact Declaration/On site validation): Inc. Halogens CFLs Ref.: 5725 98 Efficient Products – Direct Install Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Power – Candela...
AI summary The document contains forms and data collection fields related to the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on lighting power usage, hours of use, and lamp status validation.
nt or missing, indicate how many: When were the lamps removed or when did they burn? Is the facility manager planning to have them replaced? If, not why? Are they OK with the reduced light level? Ref.: 5725 99 Efficient Products – Direct I...
AI summary The document is an evaluation report for the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on the installation and performance of LED exit signs. It includes data collection forms for verifying the number of existing and installed lamps, their power consumption, and the status of the lamps (burnt or missing).
rmostat? Indicate the heating system number (based on the information collected in the heating system section): Locate the heating device and indicate its type (ex: baseboard, wall heater, etc.): Ref.: 5725 101 Efficient Products – Direct...
AI summary The document outlines forms and data collection procedures for efficiency programs, including thermostat usage, heating system details, and insulation information for hot water systems. It focuses on data gathering for the Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
ation): Is the tank insulated: YES/NO (On-site validation)? Tank capacity [gal] (On-site validation): Water heater model number (On-site validation): Hot water temperature (Contact declaration) Ref.: 5725 102 Efficient Products – Direct In...
AI summary The text outlines data collection procedures for an evaluation report on the Efficient Products – Direct Install Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about the percentage of screw-base light sockets containing CFLs before and after program participation.
y-efficient products prior to talking with IF 2 OR 9 : FR1 = 0% anyone about the program? FR1a. I just to make sure - Before you decided to participate in the IF 1. Yes: FR1 = 100% program, you had already made the decision to install the...
AI summary This text outlines a survey or assessment tool used to evaluate customer participation in energy-efficient product programs. It includes questions about pre-program decisions, likelihood of installation without the program, and the influence of the program on customer choices.
0 to 10) FR4_P = MAX(a; b; c) Factors a, b and c = Program factors PA2 Score: (10 - FR4_P) x 10% FR2c. In the absence of the program, what is the likelihood that you would IF FR2c > 5 : ASK FR2cc have installed exactly the same energy-effi...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring mechanism (PA2 Score) based on responses to questions about the likelihood of installing energy-efficient products without a program and the timing of such installations. The scoring depends on responses to FR2c and FR2cc, with different weightings based on the time delay.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives and programs undertaken during that period.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which likely details the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives undertaken during that year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Logic Model ............................................................ 5 Figure 2: Methodological Model ..............
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, based on interviews with the Program Manager, delivery agents, and energy auditors, as well as on-site visits, simulations, and a telephone survey of participants.
h interviews with the Program Manager (PM) and four delivery agents and energy auditors as well as on two on-site visits, 25 participant simulations and a telephone survey of 70 program participants. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The EEH program provid...
AI summary The EEH program provides financial incentives to homeowners for energy efficiency improvements. It includes pre- and post-retrofit audits, uses a simulation tool (HOT2000), and collaborates with Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan).
0, and submitted to the homeowner through a report. Once the measures have been implemented, a post-retrofit evaluation is conducted to assess the upgrades made and give the house an EnerGuide rating. Since the end of October 2011, the EEH...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including a pilot project with Standard Direct Install and Direct Install Plus components, aimed to achieve 7.80 GWh of electricity savings and 2.14 MW of demand savings in 2011. The program involves retrofits, evaluations, and EnerGuide ratings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report KEY FINDINGS The 2011 evaluation of the EEH program demonstrated that the program includes all the necessary ingredients and is well adapted to each house that takes part in the pro...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's EEH program found that while participation slightly decreased from 2010, it remained higher than in 2009. Energy savings dropped by over 40% compared to 2010. The most recommended and implemented measures were programmable thermostats and insulation for electric water heaters. Cost was the primary reason participants did not install recommended measures.
s that had been recommended is the cost. Indeed, participants mentioned that the recommended measures were too expensive. This justification was the top reason in 2010 and 2009 as well. Satisfaction Satisfaction towards the program is high...
AI summary Participants found the recommended energy efficiency measures too expensive, though overall program satisfaction was high. Energy audits were well-received, but marketing and outreach efforts were inconsistent. Participants suggested improving information availability on program measures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Program Energy Savings To calculate the gross savings of the EEH program in 2011, Econoler reviewed the gross savings estimated by ENSC using three key features. The latter were nam...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Econoler assesses the energy savings of the EEH program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). The report recalibrates savings estimates based on EnerGuide point increases and prescriptive measures, adjusting the energy savings per EnerGuide point from 1,047 kWh to 817 kWh.
n Report The evaluation revealed that the EEH program (including the pilot project) had generated net energy savings of 4.805 GWh and demand savings of 1.543 MW in 2011, as shown in the next table. Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evalua...
AI summary The evaluation of the EEH program found that net energy savings were 4.805 GWh and demand savings were 1.543 MW in 2011. These figures are 25% lower than the tracked savings due to adjustments in energy savings per EnerGuide point and updated unitary savings values from national studies.
lues used for the calculation of the two pilot project savings were revised upward, as shown in the next table. Table 3: Direct Install Products and their Associated Energy Savings Pilot Project Unitary Savings Values (kWh/year) Products C...
AI summary The document presents a table showing revised upward energy savings values for various direct install products used in pilot projects, including CFLs, LEDs, and other efficiency measures, with tracked and evaluated savings in kWh per year.
7 Standard + Plus Pipe Insulation 74 74 Standard + Plus Hot Water Tank Wraps 399 270 Ref.: 5725 ix EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Finally, the addition of interactive effects...
AI summary The 2011 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program evaluation report notes that net-to-gross ratios were lower in 2011 compared to 2010, and that demand savings were adjusted downward by over 35% due to revised estimates for electric thermal storage systems.
by ENSC were not realistic; consequently, the former conducted a short survey of building simulations to fine-tune the latter. As a result, these demand savings were reduced by more than 35 percent. RECOMMENDATIONS Econoler finds that the...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the EEH program and found it to be a good energy efficiency initiative with satisfactory energy savings. However, they recommended creating a list of pre-approved contractors and maintaining marketing efforts to address program continuation concerns and ensure program effectiveness.
nd to maintain these efforts in order to reassure program partners as well as Nova Scotians that the Province is serious about the program, regardless of federal support. EEH-R3. Inform participants about expected customer savings: Since t...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program is being evaluated for improvements, including providing participants with information on expected savings and exploring on-bill financing to reduce financial barriers for implementing energy efficiency measures.
bill financing scheme for residential customers. This could help overcome the financial barrier related to the implementation of certain expensive energy efficiency measures. EEH-R4. Collect the building energy consumption data for each ho...
AI summary The text discusses methods for calculating energy savings in residential energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the use of building-specific data and improving billing analysis to adjust for overestimations by the HOT2000 simulation tool.
ation energy consumption data with a view to establishing an adjustment ratio by comparing the HOT2000 expected savings to the actual reduction in participants’ energy bills. EEH-R6. Revise HOT2000 models on a random basis: The Evaluator o...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), aims to improve energy efficiency in residential buildings in Nova Scotia. The program includes measures such as revising HOT2000 models and ensuring accurate energy consumption data collection to validate savings.
xisting Houses (EEH) program encourages homeowners in Nova Scotia (NS) to improve the energy efficiency (EE) of their house. The program also extends to small multi-unit residential buildings (MURBs). The program provides incentives from E...
AI summary The EEH program in Nova Scotia encourages homeowners and small multi-unit residential buildings to improve energy efficiency through incentives. It uses DSM ratepayer funding and provincial taxpayer funds for different aspects of the program. The program initially partnered with NRCan’s ecoENERGY Retrofit Homes program, which ended in 2010 but was later reinstated in 2011, with a deadline for participation set for 2012.
accepting new registrations.1 As planned, all retrofit renovations had to be completed by March 31, 2012, but the deadline for completing the post- retrofit evaluations was extended to June 30, 2012. The EEH program of ENSC contracts with...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), requires homeowners to contact delivery agents for pre-retrofit evaluations. These evaluations include a blower door test and cost $150 plus tax, with additional fees for larger homes. The program was extended to allow post-retrofit evaluations until June 30, 2012.
2011 Evaluation Report along with the effectiveness of the proposed energy efficiency measures are calculated using a simulation tool developed by the federal government, namely HOT20003. The homeowner then has 18 months to complete the up...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the use of the HOT2000 simulation tool for calculating energy efficiency measures, the process for homeowners to complete upgrades and schedule post-retrofit evaluations, and the structure and implementation of pilot projects under the EEH program, including the Standard Direct Install and Direct Install Plus initiatives.
t receives $55 to install the tank and pipe wraps, and $30 for installing the bulbs. ENSC would like that the Certified Energy Advisors reach an amount of at least $60 of installed products per house. The Direct Install Plus pilot project...
AI summary The EEH program targets existing homes in Nova Scotia, offering incentives for energy-efficient products. ENSC aims for Certified Energy Advisors to install at least $60 worth of products per house. The Direct Install Plus pilot includes additional products like electric kettles and faucet aerators. HOT2000 is a residential energy analysis software used for EnerGuide ratings.
n Report Eligible Measures Through the standard EEH program, ENSC’s contribution for the energy-saving portion of the program covers a series of DSM measures for the following electricity end-uses: > electrically heated buildings; > buildi...
AI summary The EEH program covers various DSM measures for electricity end-uses and envelope improvements in residences using non-electric energy sources. The eligible products for the direct install pilot project are listed in Table 4.
wo components of the EEH direct install pilot project, the eligible products to be installed are shown below. Table 4: List of Eligible Products Installed under the Pilot Project Components Standard Direct Direct Install Plus Products Inst...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program and its pilot project components aim to achieve electricity and demand savings through the installation of eligible energy-efficient products. The program generated significant electricity savings in 2009 and 2010, with targets of 7.80 GWh and 2.14 MW for 2011.
r Existing Houses Program Logic Model4 4 The numbers 1 through 11 contained in this logic model explain the relationship between the different levels involved. They are presented in Appendix II. Ref.: 5725 5 EnerGuide for Existing Houses P...
AI summary This document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes a methodological model, sources of program information, and details of an in-depth interview with the program manager.
obtained primarily from the following sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation report; > program manual; > tracking sheet. 2.2.2 In-Depth Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff conducted one interview in September with the Program...
AI summary The evaluation process includes interviews with the Program Manager and program partners, as well as on-site visits to assess the EEH program's implementation. The interviews covered program justification, savings calculations, marketing strategies, and participant feedback, while on-site visits evaluated the effectiveness of energy efficiency measures.
o is a certified ecoEnergy advisor. The sampling was established to include one D audit and one E audit. Furthermore, the selection included the evaluation of two different energy advisor companies. Ref.: 5725 7 EnerGuide for Existing Hous...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, including on-site visits to validate auditor compliance with EnerGuide guidelines, simulation reviews using HOT2000, and participant surveys. The evaluation involves comparing real energy consumption with simulated results to assess program effectiveness.
mented. The billing information for these 25 participants was also used to compare real annual consumption with the HOT2000 consumption and calculate an adjustment ratio. 2.2.6 Participant Survey A telephone survey with a total of 70 progr...
AI summary The document discusses a participant survey conducted by Econoler’s subcontractor, Corporate Research Associates, Inc. (CRA), to evaluate the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. The survey aimed to understand participant motivations, concerns, and program impact, with 70 participants interviewed via telephone in October and November.
ple size as well as the associated sampling error at the 90 percent confidence level for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 telephone surveys. Table 5: Sample Size and Sampling Error Sampling Error at 90% Survey Population Sample Size (n) Confidence...
AI summary The process evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program, conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focuses on assessing the effectiveness of the program's design and delivery. The evaluation involved interviews with program managers and partners, on-site visits, and a telephone survey of participants.
interviews conducted with the PM and with the program partners, through on-site visits with participants as well as through a telephone survey of program participants. 3.2 PROGRAM MANUAL CONTENT The EEH program features a manual that conta...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program includes a program manual with components such as program description, objectives, incentives, eligibility criteria, and savings calculations. The manual is a critical tool for program staff and evaluators, and is tailored to meet specific organizational needs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report EEH Program Program Manual Content Manual Budget per year Cost-effectiveness test results Market study or technical study that supports program elements or assumptions Marketing pla...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the EEH Program reviewed the program manual and found that it contains relevant information for program managers and evaluators but lacks completeness. Recommendations were made to supplement and improve the tool.
yet complex information that is difficult to understand, leaving room for improvement in terms of ease of use. Nevertheless, once the user understands it, the tracking sheet is still efficient to use. The Evaluator believes that a number o...
AI summary The Evaluator notes that the tracking sheet is complex but efficient once understood. They recommend removing fields related to energy savings for specific measures that do not affect the EnerGuide rating, such as programmable thermostats and certain drain water heat recovery systems, to improve clarity and program evaluation.
am: existing houses and small multi-unit residential buildings (MURB). The PM ought to include this information in the tracking sheet to follow program development for each project type. > Create fields for building energy consumption data...
AI summary The text discusses improvements to the tracking sheet for energy efficiency programs, including the inclusion of building energy consumption data and systematic data entry processes. It also highlights the EEH program as a well-designed initiative with multiple funding sources, including NRCan, ENSC, and the Province of NS.
axpayers). While NRCan operates on its own, ENSC acts as a single window for taxpayers and for rate payers. This is an excellent initiative as long as this does not complicate the participant process. The program uses a good approach to mo...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program is reviewed for its participant process, baseline and post-retrofit monitoring, and measures to prevent double-counting savings. A $150 pre-retrofit fee is introduced to encourage genuine participation. The program improved its process with a flow chart in 2011, and Econoler provided recommendations for further improvements.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Develop an evaluation plan in parallel with program design and development: This program has no evaluation plan. Econoler strongly recommends that for each new program, an evaluat...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights the need for an evaluation plan during program design, stronger partnership with DAs, and the creation of a list of pre-approved contractors to enhance program implementation and effectiveness.
Training contractors and establishing a list of pre-approved contractors should be part of the program components to reduce complaints and achieve program savings as closely as possible. > Inform the participants about the expected savings...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of training contractors and informing participants about expected savings to reduce complaints and improve program effectiveness. It also suggests enhancing the ENSC website to improve communication about the EEH program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Facilitate the understanding of the participation process by clarifying the difference between steps 3 and 4: In the “Enroll in the Program’’ section found on the website (MURB co...
AI summary The document highlights issues with the clarity of the participation process in Efficiency Nova Scotia's program, particularly the confusion between steps 3 and 4, the need for clearer examples in rebate descriptions, and inconsistencies in rebate maximum amounts between the Rebate Guide and program manual.
ount per house for electricity DSM. This information could be confusing and misleading and should be clarified in the program literature, including the website. 3.6 ON-SITE VISITS The on-site visits conducted as part of the evaluation of t...
AI summary The evaluation of the EEH program highlights the need for clarification in program literature regarding the electricity DSM cost per house. On-site visits were conducted to assess the ecoEnergy protocol followed by energy advisors, with the Evaluator noting that while procedures were generally followed, there were issues with the blower test approach, including inconsistent temperature measurements and improperly sealed fan holes.
e differences caused by wind fluctuations. Moreover, internal and external temperatures were not taken systematically when conducting the blower door tests. In some cases, the temperature was taken a Ref.: 5725 16 EnerGuide for Existing Ho...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program evaluation report highlights issues with blower door testing practices, including inconsistent temperature measurements and improper fan hole handling, which could lead to biased results. The evaluator recommends improving client communication and better documentation of house parameters for more accurate HOT2000 simulations.
lations are made at a certain time upon completion of the site visit. This practice also allows for the verification of simulation data entries by a third party who has not been on site. > Enforce the protocol procedures for performing blo...
AI summary The text discusses issues with the execution of blower door tests and the need for more detailed technical information in energy audit reports. It highlights mistakes in testing procedures and suggests improvements to enhance the accuracy of energy efficiency evaluations and provide better guidance to participants.
C should promote the addition of technical information and safety concerns (if any) on the audit reports to help participants understand and follow up on their energy efficiency project. > Encourage the energy advisor to provide participan...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of providing technical information and safety concerns on energy audit reports to help participants understand energy efficiency projects. It also mentions the use of informational booklets developed by NRCan under its ecoENERGY program to improve participant understanding and increase agreement with audit recommendations. The evaluation report highlights confusion and uncertainty caused by the Federal Government's exit from the EEH program and its impact on program resources.
oyment when NRCan ended the program, thus leaving fewer available resources for the program continuation. Indeed, one DA indicated that he could use the service of another auditor or two at this time. The reinstatement of the federal progr...
AI summary The reinstatement of the federal program in 2011 increased complexity and confusion due to conflicting messages from the Federal Government and ENSC. The program name change to include multi-unit residential buildings is seen positively. Partners express satisfaction with ENSC but note lower satisfaction with other program elements and limited interaction between service organizations.
tle interaction between the service organizations (DAs and contractors) and that some contractors continue to show a lack of understanding of EE programs, which can lead to confusion among homeowners. While one energy auditor expressed a h...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights concerns about the lack of understanding of EE programs by some contractors and the need for better support after training. Program partners also criticize the marketing efforts and suggest increased provincial funding and new rebates to compensate for the loss of federal support.
r a price of $39. Direct installation of low cost measures was also included in the Team Buy offer. For more information on the Team Buy approach, visit the following website: http://www.teambuy.ca/. Ref.: 5725 19 EnerGuide for Existing Ho...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program's evaluation report highlights that 40% of participants learned about it through word of mouth, with additional awareness from newspapers, the internet, and other media. Marketing activities also play a role in program awareness.
Other 13% Don’t know 7% Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 20 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.9.2 Participation Motivations and Barriers Similar to last year, the primary reason...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program's 2011 evaluation report highlights that the primary motivation for participation is saving money on energy costs (33%), followed by interest in home efficiency (17%). Other motivations include seeking expert advice (14%) and receiving rebates (14%).
r one in 10 wanted to help the environment (6%). Secondary motivators are generally consistent with primary motivators. Table 8: Reasons for Interest in Having Home Evaluated
AI summary The text discusses motivations for homeowners to have their homes evaluated, with a primary focus on environmental concerns, citing that one in 10 wanted to help the environment (6%). Secondary motivators align with primary ones.
2009 2010 2011 Participant Motivations Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Reason Reasons Reason Reasons Reason Reasons Sample Size 23 23 70 70 70 70 To save on energy costs/bills 17% 17% 26% 16% 33% 17% Find out how effi...
AI summary This table outlines participant motivations for energy efficiency programs from 2009 to 2011. The primary motivations include saving on energy costs, home evaluations, expert opinions, rebates, and pre-existing interest in energy efficiency. Environmental concerns and heating improvements are less frequently cited.
29 Refused 1 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 21 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Six percent of participants had concerns about the EEH program prior to taking part, which is con...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that 6% of participants had concerns about the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program before participation, with issues related to rebate amounts, cost, and time. The energy auditor's advice was considered the most important factor in participants' decisions to implement energy-efficient measures.
label and designation were less important (mean of 6.8), while previous experience was not deemed important (mean of 4.6). Table 10: Importance of Program in Influencing Decisions Mean Rating: 2011 10= “extremely important” and 0= “not imp...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that program incentives and information from energy auditors were highly valued by respondents, while the EnerGuide label and previous experience with similar programs were less important. Most respondents implemented recommended energy efficiency measures.
ded (keeping in mind that some of these respondents might have only been given recommendations for one measure). Finally, six percent of respondents did not implement any of the measures recommended. Table 11: Implemented Energy Efficiency...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that 50% of participants implemented all recommended energy efficiency measures, while 42% implemented some, and 6% implemented none. Electronic programmable thermostats and exposed pipe insulation were the most commonly recommended and implemented measures, whereas high-efficiency heat pumps and drain water heat recovery units had the lowest implementation rates.
2009 2010 2011 Recommended Implemented Recommended Implemented Recommended Implemented Sample Size 23 23 70 70 70 70 Electronic programmable 70% 43% 66% 41% 63% 51% thermostats Electric water heater N/A N/A 36 10 56 51 exposed pipe insulat...
AI summary The table presents the implementation rates of various energy efficiency programs from 2009 to 2011, including the use of programmable thermostats, insulation for electric water heaters, heat pumps, and thermal storage systems. Implementation rates vary across years and program types, with some programs showing significant improvements and others showing minimal progress.
6 6 hot air furnaces Electric thermal storage central hydronic 4 4 4 3 1 systems Ref.: 5725 24 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The next table shows the measure uptake (install...
AI summary The evaluation report for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program in 2011 highlights that electric water heater insulation and programmable thermostats had the highest uptake among participants.
insulation, along with electronic programmable thermostats are those that had the highest uptake among program participants. Table 13: Effectiveness of Measures Proposed Energy Efficiency Measures Measure Uptake Sample Size 70 Electric wat...
AI summary The table highlights the uptake of various energy efficiency measures, with insulation and programmable thermostats having the highest adoption rates. Many respondents who did not implement recommended measures cited cost as the primary barrier, with 61% considering the measures too expensive.
2009 as well. A small number did not have the financial means to implement the measure (6%), they were too busy (6%), they did not believe they needed it (3%) or the rebate was not big enough (3%). Ref.: 5725 25 EnerGuide for Existing Hous...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program evaluation found that the primary reason participants did not implement recommended energy efficiency measures was the high cost. The evaluator suggests providing information on expected savings in pre-retrofit reports to reduce perceived cost barriers.
2009 2010 2011 Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Reason Reasons Reason Reasons Reason Reasons Sample Size 15 15 50 41 31 30 Too expensive 33% 7% 46% 17% 61% 7% Didn’t have the financial 13 2 6 7 means Too busy 7 4 6 Did...
AI summary The text presents survey results from 2009 to 2011 regarding barriers to energy efficiency program participation. Key reasons cited include high costs, lack of financial means, perceived lack of need, and dissatisfaction with rebate sizes. These insights highlight challenges in encouraging program uptake.
vironmentally friendly Had another heat source 7 Looking for alternatives 7 Other 16 3 No other reasons 47 63 Don’t know 22 3 53 Refused 7 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 26 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program evaluation report indicates that 90% of respondents noticed improved comfort levels after energy efficiency measures were implemented. Specific improvements include warmer homes, even temperatures, fewer drafts, reduced energy costs, and easier temperature control.
rgy (16%), it is more convenient to control temperatures automatically (10%) and more comfortable temperatures in the home (10%). Table 15: Specific Impacts on Comfort
AI summary The text discusses the impact of energy efficiency measures on comfort, highlighting that 16% of respondents find it more convenient to control temperatures automatically, while 10% each find it more convenient and more comfortable to have controlled temperatures in the home.
9 Hot water lasts longer 3 Don’t have to put wood in stove 5 2 Heat is not as comfortable/basement is colder 5 2 Other 7 10 Don’t know 2 2 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 27 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that 57% of respondents noted a decrease in their energy bills following the implementation of energy efficiency measures, with 7% reporting an increase and 32% noting no change or insufficient time to determine the impact.
y dissatisfied (n=4), expressed this opinion for the following reasons: they had not received their rebate yet, there was a lack of information or the equipment they had installed was not eligible. Ref.: 5725 28 EnerGuide for Existing Hous...
AI summary Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program due to not receiving their rebate and lack of information. However, overall satisfaction with the program's aspects like energy audits and advisor courtesy was extremely high.
d somewhat lower satisfaction ratings in comparison with other measures, although this rating is still high (86%). Table 18: Satisfaction with Specific Aspects of the Program Satisfaction with Specific Aspects of the Program 2009 2010 2011...
AI summary The satisfaction ratings for the program are generally high, with 86% overall satisfaction. Most respondents are satisfied with the energy audits and energy efficiency measures, though some dissatisfaction was noted regarding the energy evaluator's demeanor, audit duration, recommendations, and follow-up reports.
-up report and another mentioned a general lack of information. Similar to previous results, nearly all respondents are satisfied with the energy efficiency measures implemented in their home (96%). Table 19: Satisfaction with Energy Effic...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates high satisfaction (96%) with energy efficiency measures implemented in homes. However, 43% of respondents believe the program should have included additional measures such as heating, insulation, windows, solar panels, and appliances.
% 41% 43% No 57 46 54 Don’t know 9 0 3 Fifty percent of respondents were unable to offer any recommendations for improving the EEH program. Among respondents who suggested program improvements, 14 percent mentioned offering more informatio...
AI summary Fifty percent of respondents could not recommend improvements to the EEH program. Among those who did, 14% suggested more information on recommended measures, 9% wanted more time for implementation, and others suggested increasing rebates, expanding eligible measures, and improving communication.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The program partners contacted during the in-depth interviews mentioned having received complaints from participants about the lack of information on qualifying measures. This reinf...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights that participants in the EEH program expressed a need for more information on qualifying measures and better communication. A majority of respondents believed a diagram illustrating the program's steps would improve participation, and ENSC's 2011 flow chart is noted as a positive initiative.
This result indicates that the participation process flow chart developed by ENSC in late 2011 was a good initiative as it will potentially simplify the participation of future program participants. Table 22: Provision of a Diagram Illustr...
AI summary The document discusses an impact evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program in 2011, focusing on energy and demand savings. The evaluation considered factors such as HOT2000 simulations, prescriptive measure savings, free-ridership, and internal spillover to determine the program's gross and net savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report A better way to use the comparison group could be to look for trends or to construct a trend line that can be incorporated into the analysis. For the billing analysis, the trend lin...
AI summary The document discusses methods for improving the comparison group analysis in efficiency programs, suggesting the use of trend lines and economic indicators. It also outlines how gross savings were estimated for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, noting data gaps in some projects.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The sample was established from the participant list found in the tracking sheet, which included 1,301 projects as of August 2011. Projects were sorted to consider only those which...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses the sampling of 1,301 projects from the tracking sheet, focusing on those with complete information and diverse prescriptive measures to calculate savings per EnerGuide point.
as to cover a wide variety of prescriptive measures. More particularly, Econoler applied the following criteria to sample projects to be used for calculating the amount of savings per EnerGuide point:
AI summary Econoler used specific criteria to evaluate sample projects for calculating energy savings per EnerGuide point, focusing on prescriptive measures.
very with an efficiency of 42 percent or greater; solar domestic hot water heating system (solar DHW); electric hot water heater tank wrap; and electric hot water heater pipe insulation and programmable thermostats. Econoler used the...
AI summary The document discusses the sampling process conducted by Econoler for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. A representative sample of 25 projects was selected based on specific criteria, including efficiency ratings and types of energy-saving measures. The sample was compared to the overall project population using average EnerGuide ratings and energy savings.
2011 Evaluation Report and average energy savings per project (in kWh/year). The results of this comparison analysis are presented in the next table. Table 23: Sampled Projects Compared to Population Average Energy Savings per Average Init...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report compares sampled projects to the overall program population, analyzing average energy savings per EnerGuide point using pre-audit and post-audit simulation results. The sample is considered representative of the program population.
population. EnerGuide Rating The sampled projects were used to analyze the average energy savings per EnerGuide point through the comparison of pre-audit (D) and post-audit (E) simulation results. Econoler extracted the EnerGuide points an...
AI summary Econoler analyzed energy savings per EnerGuide point by comparing pre-audit and post-audit simulation results from 23 out of 25 sampled projects. Two projects were excluded due to missing data or inconsistencies. Calculations were done on a per-project basis to ensure equal weighting, and an overall average was computed.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 24: Calculation of Average Savings per EnerGuide Average Point Saving from HOT2000 Data Description Values and Units Number of projects 23 Increase of EnerGuide point per proj...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 Evaluation Report discusses Econoler's analysis of energy savings from the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. The report highlights an average savings of 1,089 kWh/year per EnerGuide point across 23 projects with energy savings ranging from 413 to 29,372 kWh/year.
imated the overall value of savings per EnerGuide point at 1,089 kWh/year, using data from all sample projects. Upon completion of this simulation analysis, Econoler highlights the following findings: > The calculated energy savings values...
AI summary Econoler analyzed energy savings per EnerGuide point and found significant variability in savings values. The analysis revealed that savings per EnerGuide point were not significantly influenced by evaluated parameters. Discrepancies between initial EnerGuide ratings and HOT2000 simulations were noted, and Econoler opted to use HOT2000 data for consistency. A linear regression analysis was conducted to improve precision.
es the results of this regression analysis along with the calculated linear equation for estimating the simulated energy consumption of a residential building in relation with its EnerGuide rating. 9 22 out of the 23 sample projects show a...
AI summary A regression analysis is presented showing the relationship between EnerGuide ratings and residential building electricity consumption. The analysis indicates that 22 out of 23 projects showed an increase in EnerGuide points, with energy savings ranging from 413 to 10,350 kWh/year.
000 0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 EnerGuide Rating This linear regression was established using 47 points. The coefficient of determination R2 (0.805) shows that this regression is statistically acceptable (over 0.75) and thereby likely represen...
AI summary A regression analysis using 47 data points shows a strong relationship between EnerGuide ratings and energy consumption, with an R2 value of 0.805. The coefficient of 1,052 kWh is close to previously calculated savings per point. The regression is considered valid for EnerGuide ratings between 58 and 89, but less accurate outside this range.
imulations of the 25 sample projects. The fact that each project is considered twice (before and after project implementation) may improve the overall coefficient of determination R2. 10 International Performance Measurement and Verificati...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the removal of three energy consumption data points from regression analysis due to missing or unreliable values and outliers. Despite an acceptable R2 coefficient, the average savings value from a previous simulation is used for further calculations.
rage and thus has over-influenced the regression analysis (it increased the R of the regressions analysis by 10%). Consequently, Econoler decided not to include this value in the regression analysis. Ref.: 5725 38 EnerGuide for Existing Ho...
AI summary The analysis found that the HOT2000 simulation overestimates building energy consumption, which affects the accuracy of energy savings calculations. Econoler excluded a value that increased the regression analysis' R by 10% due to its over-influence.
gure spreads the 17 sample projects in terms of percentage difference between actual and simulated consumption. Figure 5: Spread of the Percentage of Overconsumption with the Simulation Percentage Diffrerence between Actual and Simulated C...
AI summary The figure shows that the average overestimation of energy consumption in HOT2000 simulations is around 40%, which is significantly higher than typical acceptable inaccuracies of building energy software. This discrepancy must be considered when calculating savings per EnerGuide point coefficient.
ound 10 to 15 percent. Nevertheless, this percentage cannot be automatically applied to the calculated savings per EnerGuide point coefficient without taking into account the following considerations: > The fact that HOT2000 simulations te...
AI summary The text discusses concerns about the accuracy of HOT2000 simulations in estimating energy savings per EnerGuide point, noting that overestimation percentages vary significantly and that a sample of 17 projects may not be sufficient for calculating a reliable adjustment factor. Econoler suggests additional comparative analyses to refine the percentage used for adjustment.
r EnerGuide point coefficient. As mentioned previously, the sample project simulations include at least one of each prescriptive measure. Starting with the HOT2000 simulations created by the energy Ref.: 5725 40 EnerGuide for Existing Hous...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on the impact of various prescriptive measures on electricity consumption in HOT2000 simulations. It highlights that only certain measures, such as solar DHW and electric hot water heater tank wrap, resulted in reduced electricity consumption when electrical space heating was involved.
No modification Solar DHW Reduction of electricity consumption (if electrical space heating) In conclusion, four prescriptive measures have to be evaluated separately from the EnerGuide point analysis. Their gross savings will be calculate...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from prescriptive measures, including solar DHW and drain water heat recovery systems. It references the EnerGuide program and the OPA report, which provides unitary savings values based on assumptions about shower usage and system efficiency.
itary savings value for this measure as that used for the DWHR units with more than 42 percent efficiency; i.e., 816 kWh per year for each installed system. Electric hot water heater pipe insulation The EEH program proposes the installatio...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency savings values for various residential programs, including electric hot water heater pipe insulation and tank wraps. These values are based on evaluations from the EEH program, Low Income program, and OPA reports, with Econoler selecting the most reliable and consistent figures for use in their analysis.
ssumptions used by the OPA to estimate this unitary savings value are clear, well documented and reliable, Econoler decided to use the unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for this evaluation. Ref.: 5725 42 EnerGuide for Existing Hous...
AI summary The OPA provided a unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, which Econoler accepted as reliable. For programmable thermostats, ENSC uses a value of 63.15 kWh per year, based on the OPA's calculation of 1% savings per degree setback. A Hydro-Québec evaluation is referenced for thermostat accuracy and setback savings.
rmostat accuracy and by the temperature set back. The table below presents the results of this evaluation. Table 26: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec’s Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Calculation Parameters Duplex /...
AI summary The text presents a table evaluating energy savings from electronic thermostats and temperature setbacks in different housing types, highlighting savings percentages and consumption data across various categories.
ats per housing 4.33 1.66 1.91 Savings per thermostat [kWh] 100 201 118 12 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Savers – Thermostats and Control Systems, www.energysavers.gov, Last update: 2011-09-02. 13 Econoler, Évaluation du programme ther...
AI summary The document evaluates the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on energy savings from electronic thermostats. Savings were calculated based on research by Hydro-Québec’s LTE, comparing bimetallic and electronic thermostats using data from 25,703 clients and 206,861 billing periods.
temperature set back, the savings per housing resulted from a billing analysis regression which compared the consumption of houses with electronic thermostats and houses with programmable thermostats. As the unitary savings value of 63.15...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the savings from programmable thermostats in Nova Scotia, considering data from Hydro-Québec and field data from the EP-DI program. They adjusted savings estimates based on housing types and assumed most participants lived in single-detached homes, leading to an estimated unitary savings of 221 kWh per year.
ndard hot water tanks to 50 US gallons. A seasonal savings pattern was also generated for each housing sector based on a hot water usage profile defined in the Building America Performance Analysis15. Moreover, the OPA estimated the energy...
AI summary The OPA estimated the energy production potential of solar thermal systems using SRCC data, adjusting for location differences between Rochester and Toronto. Econoler then adjusted these results for Nova Scotia, considering solar radiation data from NASA and adjusting annual savings by 5.3 percent to reflect differences between Toronto and Halifax.
reduced the annual savings of a residential solar DHW system in Toronto by 5.3 percent to obtain the unitary annual savings to be used for Nova Scotia; i.e., 1,622 kWh/year for each installed unit. 15 Daily Water Use Profile, Building Amer...
AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of annual savings for residential solar DHW systems in Nova Scotia based on Toronto data and outlines pilot project savings for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including various energy-efficient products installed.
gram were removed from the program tracking sheet as soon as the pilot projects would start. The two energy-efficient products subject to double-counting were pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps. The next sections present the analysis...
AI summary The document discusses the removal of pilot projects from the program tracking sheet and the analysis of energy savings for 13 W CFLs. It highlights the use of metering data from Hydro-Québec to adjust daily usage estimates and calculates a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh for 13 W CFLs.
, Econoler considers more accurate to use the daily usage of 2.7 hours from Hydro-Québec’s metering study. The review resulted in a unitary savings value for 13 watt CFLs of 46.3 kWh, as shown below. 60 13 2.7 365 46.3 1000 23 W CFLs For a...
AI summary Econoler calculates energy savings for CFLs by comparing their wattage to incandescent lamps and using data from Hydro-Québec's metering studies. For 13 watt CFLs, a daily usage of 2.7 hours was applied, resulting in a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh. For 23 watt CFLs, an average displaced wattage of 70.5 W was used, leading to a unitary savings value of 69.5 kWh.
.7 365 69.5 1000 CFL Compatible Floor Lamps (CFL torchieres) ENSC estimated the unitary savings for CFL torchieres at 241 kWh per year. This figure was based on the Navigant study mentioned earlier. The assumptions used to estimate this va...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings estimation for CFL torchieres, initially estimated at 241 kWh per year by ENSC, but later adjusted to 69.5 kWh by Econoler based on revised assumptions. The calculation involved comparing the wattage of CFL torchieres (23 W) with incandescent lamps (93.5 W) and using an average daily usage of 2.7 hours.
69.5 1000 Therefore, the unitary savings estimation of 241 kWh was adjusted to 69.5 kWh. LEDs ENSC did not record the power capacity of the installed LEDs. Therefore, Econoler based the energy savings evaluation on the average power given...
AI summary The unitary savings estimation for LEDs was adjusted from 241 kWh to 69.5 kWh due to inaccurate power capacity data. Econoler used an average of 7 watts per LED and adjusted daily usage based on Hydro-Québec metering data, resulting in a revised unitary savings of 32.5 kWh.
1W Average Displaced Wattage 6W Operating Time 12 h/day Annual Savings 26 kWh LED nightlights installed under the program have a wattage value of 0.3 W. They are used to replace old nightlights which are traditionally made of a 7 W incande...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy savings from LED nightlight installations under a program, using a displaced wattage of 6.7 W and an average operating time of 12 hours per day. The calculation results in an annual savings of 29.3 kWh per unit.
average operating time of 12 hours a day, Econoler calculated a unitary savings value of 29.3 kWh. This value will be used in the gross savings calculations for the installation of LED nightlights. 21 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings values for various home efficiency measures, including LED nightlights, electric kettles, and faucet aerators. These values are based on studies by Econoler and Navigant, with some values carried forward from previous evaluations.
llation of faucet aerators. Table 28: Unitary Savings Estimate for Faucet Aerators from Other Jurisdictions Annual Unitary Savings Source 176.30 kWh OPA 159.1 kWh Wisconsin Focus on Energy Evaluation23 The annual unitary savings value pres...
AI summary The document presents unitary savings estimates for faucet aerators based on studies from other jurisdictions. It uses the OPA's value of 176.30 kWh per year, considering the average savings from multiple faucets and the relevance of a Canadian comparison for ENSC programs.
ll be used in the current evaluation is 176.30 kWh per year. 23 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Focus on Energy Evaluation, conducted by PA Consulting Group, Final Report, June 24, 2008. Ref.: 5725 50 EnerGuide for Existing Houses...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program uses a unitary savings value of 157 kWh for low-flow showerheads, based on a Navigant study. However, Econoler relied on other data sources, including an OPA report, which estimates annual savings of 377 kWh per household under specific assumptions.
minutes Average Shower Temperature 40°C (104°F) Annual Savings 377 kWh per household Econoler considers these parameters reliable and conservative. On its website, NRCan promotes the installation of low-flow showerheads24. NRCan specifies...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from low-flow showerheads and pipe insulation, referencing Natural Resources Canada and the Office of the Public Advocate. It highlights an annual savings of 377 kWh per household and the use of a unitary savings value per showerhead.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Demand Savings The demand savings of the EEH program are calculated using two different considerations. Firstly, Econoler calculated the demand savings for the EEH program usi...
AI summary The demand savings for the EEH program are calculated using an energy-to-demand ratio of 3.64 GWh/MW and include additional savings from electric thermal storage (ETS) units installed in residential buildings.
o account the operation mode of standard electrical heating systems (base case), which do not operate continuously but on a cyclic basis (full load/partial load/off) depending on heat requirements. 25 In January 2012, the firm Navigant con...
AI summary The text discusses the operation of standard electrical heating systems and their impact on energy and demand savings calculations. It references a 2012 confirmation by Navigant that ETS unit demand savings were excluded from 2011 targets, and provides technical details on heating load curves and calculations from CanmetEnergy and ASHRAE.
For the calculation of savings at the generator level, Econoler used a line loss factor of 10.5 percent, which takes into account transmission and distribution losses. This value was provided by NSPI. Taking everything into account, the 20...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) program in 2011, using a line loss factor of 10.5 percent provided by NSPI. The estimated gross energy savings are 6.740 GWh at the meter and 7.447 GWh at the generator, with peak demand savings of 2.140 MW and 2.364 MW respectively.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives and programs in the region.
Table 30: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings Program- Savings per DWHR DWHR Pipe Tank mable Solar 13 Watt 23 Watt Product Category EnerGuide (eff. = 30% (eff. ≥ CFLs CFLs Insulation Wraps Thermostat DHW Point to 42%) 42%)...
AI summary The table presents evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings from various programs, including the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and other initiatives. It lists the number of units installed, unitary energy savings, and total gross energy savings for different product categories and technologies.
3 69.5 Total Gross Energy Savings – 4.521 0.001 0.002 0.071 0.181 0.427 0.044 0.758 0.100 at Meter (GWh) Line Loss Factor 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 Total Gross Energy Savings – 4.995 0.001 0.003 0.079 0.200 0.47...
AI summary The text provides numerical data on energy and demand savings related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including gross energy savings at meter and generator levels, line loss factors, and energy-to-demand ratios, with additional notes on the calculation methodology and an acronym definition.
per EnerGuide point. The unitary savings value shown in this column is the savings per EnerGuide point figure calculated through the EEH program impact evaluation. DWHR: Drain Water Heat Recovery Ref.: 5725 55 EnerGuide for Existing Houses...
AI summary This text discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and its evaluation by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on unitary savings values calculated through the EEH program impact evaluation and referencing Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR).
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of the organization's activities and performance during that period.
Energy savings for hot water tank wraps were calculated only when there was no electrical space heating and when the water heating system was electric. For the participants who had not received a D audit report, the Evaluator calculated en...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings calculations for hot water tank wraps and the distribution of energy-efficient products across various categories. It includes data on the number of units from different programs and installation projects.
t Project Number of Units from Direct 26 1,550 140 78 1,678 708 Install Plus Pilot Project Number of Units 26 1,550 661 78 1,678 708 0 3 66 Unitary Energy Savings (kWh) 69.5 29.3 32.5 49 176 377 N/A N/A N/A Total Gross Energy Savings – 0.0...
AI summary The text presents a table with energy savings data from a project, including the number of units, energy savings in kWh and GWh, line loss factors, and demand savings. The data appears to be related to energy efficiency initiatives and their impact on energy consumption.
105 Total Gross Demand Savings 0.0005 0.014 0.007 0.001 0.090 0.081 0 0.033 0.285 – at Generator (MW) The "LED Bulbs" category of the above table includes all the LEDs less than 10 watts and greater than 10 watts (Standard Direct Install),...
AI summary The document discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and suggests improvements to the methodology for calculating gross demand savings. It recommends using building-specific energy consumption data simulated by HOT2000 to calculate energy savings more accurately, rather than relying on average savings per EnerGuide point.
nformation). This way of calculating the savings would be more tailored to the reality of each building than by using an average savings per EnerGuide point for all program participants. > Conduct a more thorough billing analysis to evalua...
AI summary The text suggests improving the accuracy of energy savings calculations by tailoring them to individual buildings, conducting more thorough billing analyses to adjust for HOT2000 overestimations, and randomly revising HOT2000 models to validate input data and ensure quality control.
PM should target projects with outlier values, such as an initial EnerGuide rating below 20 or an increase of the EnerGuide rating by more than 40 points. 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implement...
AI summary The text discusses the EEH program's approach to identifying outlier projects based on EnerGuide ratings and the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, such as the impact of replacing lighting with CFLs or LEDs on heating and cooling loads. An interactive effects factor of -43.8 percent was used in the evaluation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report based its assessment on a study conducted by ADS in 1992 for Hydro-Québec.28 The work performed in this study was intended to modify certain parameters in simulations of an average...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses the methodology used to assess program impact, including the use of simulations from a 1992 study and adjustments based on heating systems and energy sources among program participants.
he calculation details of the interactive effects. It reflects the proportion of residences in Nova Scotia that are mainly heated by electricity and those that have air conditioning units or systems. Table 31: Interactive Effects Factor fo...
AI summary The table calculates the interactive effects factor for CFLs and LED bulbs in Nova Scotia, considering different heating and air conditioning scenarios. It shows the percentage of residences in each category and the corresponding interactive effects factor, resulting in a weighted average of -43.8%.
out Air Conditioning 13% x 82% = 11% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -43.8% For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the EEH program and the Direct Install pilot project, interactive effects of -100 percen...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects for water pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the EEH program and Direct Install pilot project. It considers a -100% interactive effect during heating periods in electrically heated homes and +100% during cooling periods in homes with air conditioning. A weighted interactive effects factor of -48.3% was calculated based on heating and cooling degree-days for Halifax.
on of residences in Nova Scotia that are heated electrically and those that use air conditioning units or systems. This calculation resulted in a weighted interactive effects factor of -48.3 percent. Table 32: Interactive Effects Factor fo...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of a weighted interactive effects factor for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps in Nova Scotia, resulting in a -48.3% factor. It includes a table showing the distribution of residences by heating and cooling systems and their respective effects. The section also mentions that interactive effects for other products are considered negligible.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.4.2 Internal Spillover The participant survey was also used for assessing internal spillover. In the case of the EEH program, internal spillover can occur when participants declar...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's EEH program found minimal internal spillover, with only one participant out of 70 implementing an additional energy efficiency measure (programmable thermostats) after previous participation. This accounted for 0.5% of total gross energy savings, equivalent to 37.3 MWh.
r approximately 0.5 percent of total gross energy savings for the sample.33 This percentage corresponds to energy savings at the generator attributable to the program totalling approximately 37.3 MWh. For the 2011 program impact evaluation...
AI summary The 2011 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program evaluation report calculates net savings by adjusting gross energy savings for interactive effects and the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR). The gross savings were approximately 246.8 MWh, with an internal spillover level of 1 percent considered in the calculations.
Savings per DWHR DWHR Program- Pipe Tank Solar 13 Watt 23 Watt Product Category EnerGuide (eff. = 30% (eff. ≥ mable CFLs CFLs Insulation Wraps DHW Point to 42%) 42%) thermostats Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at 4.521 0.001 0....
AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings and demand savings for various products and programs, including EnerGuide, DWHR, and CFLs. It includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factors, and NTGR. The data is analyzed at both the meter and generator levels.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an analysis of their programs and initiatives related to energy efficiency.
ETS Low-Flow ETS CFL LED Electric Faucet Central ETS Room Product Category Torchieres Nightlights LED Bulbs Kettles Aerators Showerhea Forced Air ds Hydronic Units Furnaces Systems Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at 0.002 0.045...
AI summary The text presents a table with energy savings data across various product categories, including CFLs, LEDs, electric kettles, and others. It includes metrics such as total gross energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, and line loss factor. The data is presented in GWh and includes percentages and numerical values for different product types.
1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 N/A N/A N/A Total Net Energy Savings 0.001 0.020 0.009 0.003 0.229 0.206 N/A N/A N/A (GWh) – at Generator Demand Savings Total Gross Demand Savings – 0.0005 0.012 0.006 0.001 0.081 0.073 0 0.030 0.258 at...
AI summary The document presents energy savings data for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program in 2011, comparing net energy savings values with tracked net savings. It includes tables showing total net energy and demand savings, interactive effects factors, and line loss factors.
APPENDIX I - RECOMMENDATIONS This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Program Manual 1. Document important...
AI summary The appendix outlines recommendations for improving the program manual, including detailed descriptions of roles, clarification of audit types, and the inclusion of rebate calculation sources and unitary savings information for better tracking and transparency.
gram manual. The plans should also identify for each activity the performance indicators that should be collected for monitoring and evaluation purposes. Ref.: 5725 67 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporatio...
AI summary The document highlights the need for a comprehensive program manual for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, emphasizing the importance of standardizing content and including performance indicators for effective monitoring and evaluation.
Furthermore, the content of all program manuals should be standardized based on the same template so that it is easier to locate specific sections or subjects. Program 5. Delete fields pertaining to individual measure savings for which ene...
AI summary The text discusses the need to standardize program manuals using a common template for easier navigation and suggests deleting unnecessary fields in the program tracking sheet, specifically those related to energy savings for certain measures that do not affect the EnerGuide rating.
t necessary to calculate energy savings including the “estimated kWh savings for individual measures” column to facilitate understanding of the tracking sheet. 6. Add the period or end date of the renovation: During the program impact eval...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving the tracking sheet used in program impact evaluations. It suggests adding the renovation completion date and project type to enhance billing calibration and analysis of energy efficiency measures.
multi-unit residential buildings (MURB). The PM ought to include this information in the tracking sheet to follow program development for each project type. Ref.: 5725 68 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpora...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program tracking sheet, including adding fields for building energy consumption data and ensuring systematic data entry to improve accuracy and completeness of energy savings calculations.
could be notified in advance of any major modifications to the program or could be consulted about potential EE measures to be included in the program. Ref.: 5725 69 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation...
AI summary The document discusses the need to create a list of pre-approved contractors for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program to address the lack of experienced contractors and reduce complaints, thereby improving program implementation and achieving forecasted energy savings.
a list of pre-approved contractors should be part of the program components to reduce complaints and achieve the forecast program savings more successfully. 13. Inform the participants about the expected savings of their projects: One of t...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations to improve energy efficiency programs, including pre-approved contractors to reduce complaints, educating participants on savings calculations, and clarifying program steps on the ENSC website to enhance understanding.
s 3 and 4 is not clear. Both steps take place when the assessment after retrofit has been completed. These sections could be revised for better understanding. 15. Provide examples: In the “Enroll in the Program’’ section found on the websi...
AI summary The text highlights concerns regarding the clarity of steps in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, the need for simplified rebate descriptions, and confusion around maximum rebate amounts. It suggests revisions to improve understanding and consistency between program materials.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report On-Site Visits 17. Explain in detail the protocol to the clients: The energy advisor should explain carefully the different elements of the protocol to the clients (program process,...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report outlines key findings from on-site visits related to the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's program. It emphasizes the need for energy advisors to clearly explain protocols to clients, document house parameters accurately, and properly enforce procedures for blower door tests to ensure the accuracy of HOT2000 simulations and EnerGuide ratings.
temperature on site during the visit. These practices may influence significantly the HOT2000 simulation and, therefore, the calculated EnerGuide rating. 20. Promote the addition of typical technical details on audit reports: Typical energ...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of improving audit reports and providing educational materials to enhance residential participants' understanding of energy efficiency measures. It highlights the need for more technical details and safety concerns in reports and suggests the use of informational booklets, similar to those used in NRCan's ecoENERGY program, to improve engagement and comprehension.
sed energy efficiency measures, such informational tools might increase the likelihood of participants agreeing with the recommendations of the audit report. Ref.: 5725 71 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary The document discusses the need for continued marketing efforts for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program to maintain stakeholder confidence and ensure program continuation, regardless of federal support.
quired in order to be proactive in educating Nova Scotians about the fact that ENSC and the Province are committed to the program regardless of federal support. Participant 23. Provide more information to participants on the recommended Pe...
AI summary The document highlights the need to provide participants with more detailed information about recommended energy efficiency measures, including expected savings based on the duration of the measure, to address concerns about cost barriers. It also suggests clarifying the distinction between eligible and ineligible measures to improve program communication.
recommended, several mentioned that the distinction between eligible measures and the measures not covered by the program could be made clearer. Impact 24. Collect the building energy consumption data for each house: The Evaluation Evaluat...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the clarity of eligible measures in a program and suggests a method for calculating energy savings using HOT2000 simulation data, which would provide more accurate results tailored to individual buildings rather than using an average savings per EnerGuide point.
rogram Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Impact 25. Conduct a more thorough billing analysis to evaluate the Evaluation overestimation of energy consumption by HOT2000 with better precision: The billing calibration...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report recommends conducting a more thorough billing analysis to improve the accuracy of HOT2000's energy consumption estimates and suggests random revisions of HOT2000 models to validate input data and ensure accuracy.
ion, the PM should target projects with outlier values, such as an initial EnerGuide rating below 20 or an increase of the EnerGuide rating by more than 40 points. Ref.: 5725 73 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The document discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and its implementation by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It outlines the program theory, including the selection of delivery agencies by Natural Resources Canada and the training of energy auditors using the HOT2000 simulation software.
auditors to use the simulation trainees, dates and evaluation forms. software HOT2000 and other aspects of the energy audit such as the blower door test, etc. 3 The Program Manager (PM) has a Publicity and marketing outreach, presence in e...
AI summary The text outlines processes related to energy audits and participant engagement in an energy efficiency program. It mentions the use of the HOT2000 software, marketing activities by the Program Manager, and the provision of pre-retrofit reports to participants. These reports include energy efficiency measures and cost-effectiveness information, along with the installation of insulation for electric water heaters.
report their cost-effectiveness, the mentioned in item #4. participant has all the information required to make an informed decision. Ref.: 5725 74 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Re...
AI summary The document discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, highlighting how participants can implement energy efficiency measures recommended in audits, with incentives available to cover some of the costs. Performance indicators include the compilation of measures implemented and their deemed savings.
nnual market penetration participants will result in an increased rate could be used as a performance indicator for this confidence in the merits of EE. program. 10 Contractors that specialized in Keeping statistics on specialized contract...
AI summary The text discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, highlighting how increased market penetration and participation by specialized contractors can improve energy efficiency and reduce harmful emissions. It outlines the program's theory and suggests performance indicators such as the number of houses participating and the reduction in emissions.
harmful emissions coming from thermal generation will in harmful emissions and in avoiding be reduced. building new energy plants fueled by oil or coal. Ref.: 5725 76 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation...
AI summary The text discusses the reduction of harmful emissions from thermal generation and highlights the demographics of participants in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, noting that most reside in single-family detached homes with at least three bedrooms.
han five stories Mobile home or house trailer Table 36: Number of Bedrooms Numbers of Bedrooms 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 23 70 70 1 0% 0% 0% 2 17 7 9 3 52 53 59 4 or more 30 40 33 Ref.: 5725 77 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Effici...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, highlighting household sizes with 27% having four or more people and 44% having two people residing in their households.
o $79,999 9 6 13 $80,000 or more 52 36 41 Refused 13 10 Ref.: 5725 78 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report One-half of respondents are aged 45 to 64 (52%), and just under two in 10...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program indicates that half of the respondents were aged 45 to 64, and 71% had a college or university degree. The report includes data on respondent demographics across multiple years.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV – INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: EnerGuide for Existing Houses & Multi-Units Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: Li...
AI summary The document discusses the 2011 evaluation report of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses & Multi-Units program, including interview questions and comments related to the program's status with Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN), the Provincial Government, and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). It also raises questions about the status of various recommendations and findings, including discrepancies in thermostat savings between existing and new houses.
W GUIDE WITH DELIVERY AGENTS PROCESS EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ENSC ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM PARTNERS Program Name: EnerGuide for Existing Houses & Multi-Units How to fill this form: This is a word document that integrates some form fe...
AI summary This document is a process evaluation questionnaire for ENSC energy efficiency program partners, focusing on their role, experience with the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, and their relationship with the Program Administrator. It is part of an evaluation report from 2011.
applicable It was the same Program Administrator I had to deal with a new PA The transition went smoothly The transition caused some delays or adjustments Other, please comment Q2 - On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is ex...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to participant experiences with the ENSC Program Administrator, including transition challenges, relationship satisfaction, complaints, and program improvements. It also includes a reference to an evaluation report on the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program.
Q7 – On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied), what is your satisfaction level in regard to the marketing and outreach activities to implement the program? Q 7a - If your answer to Q7 was equal to or l...
AI summary The text contains survey questions from an evaluation report on the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It asks about satisfaction with marketing and outreach, frequency of evaluations, and opinions on the number of parties and organizations involved in the program.
gram Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q9b1- If you answered Too Few or Too Many, please comment: Q10- On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is excellent), how would you rate your relationship with the...
AI summary The document contains evaluation questions from the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation report regarding the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It asks about program partner relationships, lead sources, market confusion, and opinions on program name changes and modifications.
e name change (e.g., the extension to Multi-Units)? Easy to adjust to the way you work Requires minor changes to the way you work Requires major changes to the way you work No opinion Q15- What is your opinion about the fact that ENSC now...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including feedback on program changes, the role of ENSC in rebate financing, and barriers to program implementation. It also includes confidentiality assurances and contact information for respondents.
tion report) and we hope that they will contribute to improving program performance. If we need to clarify some of your answers, we might call you back. Your name Date Phone number E-mail Ref.: 5725 90 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for energy auditors participating in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It outlines the process for completing a questionnaire to evaluate program performance and includes instructions for submission.
re it changed status and name from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, how was this transition perceived in the market? Not applicable Unnoticed Some confusion A lot of confusion Don’t know Ref.: 5725 91 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Eff...
AI summary The text discusses the transition of the program from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC and its impact on program partners, including changes in perception, relationship with the Program Administrator, and participant complaints. It also includes questions about the ease of participation in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program.
2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is ve...
AI summary This text contains a series of survey questions from the 2011 Evaluation Report for the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions focus on participant satisfaction, program complexity, suggestions for improvement, and perceptions of the number of parties involved in the program.
We would like your opinion on the number of parties involved in this program. Q9a- Other program partners like you (delivery agents and contractors). Are they? Too few Adequate Too many No opinion Q9a1- If you answered Too Few or Too Many,...
AI summary The document contains survey questions about the number of program partners, the adequacy of their involvement, and the quality of relationships among partners in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It also asks about lead sources and confusion in the market.
usion in the market among the parties, including yours and/or the participants? Other program partners Yes: which ones? What was the confusion about? No Don’t know Not applicable Ref.: 5725 95 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficien...
AI summary The text asks participants about confusion regarding the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program's name change and modifications, such as the extension to Multi-Units. It also inquires about the impact of ENSC acting as a single window for financing rebates.
for other energy-saving measures? It simplifies the participation process for the delivery agent It simplifies the implementation process for the participant It does not change anything Ref.: 5725 96 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program E...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on participation processes, complaints from partners, barriers to implementation, and evaluations of training and software performance. It does not provide specific responses or data.
racy of the HOT 2000 software that you are using to perform your audit? Q19a – If your answer to Q18 was equal to or less than 8, would you care to share the reason or reasons for such a score? Ref.: 5725 97 EnerGuide for Existing Houses P...
AI summary This text is part of a participant survey questionnaire from the 2011 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about software accuracy and participant feedback, with a focus on confidentiality and program improvement.
October 25, 2011 Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GOTO INTRODUCTION] 2 No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and w...
AI summary This text is a script for a survey conducted by CRA (Corporate Research Associates) evaluating the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, sponsored by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The script aims to confirm participation and gather feedback from respondents.
PROMPT WORKS; IF RESPONDENT STILL SAYS NO: “Is there someone else in the household who would know about having participated in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program?”] Ref.: 5725 99 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for determining if a respondent has participated in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, including prompts and recoding instructions. It also includes a section on how respondents learned about the program.
_] SECTION P - PROGRAM NOTORIETY AND REASONS FOR PARTICIPATING P1. How did you learn about the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE RESPONSES] 1. (Nova Scotia Power Bill insert) 2. (Efficiency Nova Scotia We...
AI summary The section asks respondents how they learned about the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, providing multiple channels such as websites, radio ads, program delivery agents, and word of mouth.
a contractor) 16. (Word of mouth neighbour, friend, co-worker, family member, etc.) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _] 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) P2. Now I’m going to ask you to think back to when you decided to schedule an energy efficiency eval...
AI summary The text outlines a survey questioning participants about their motivations for joining the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, including reasons such as saving on energy costs, planning for upgrades, and environmental concerns. It also inquires about concerns participants had before joining the program.
icient) 2. (That improvements would cost a lot) 3. (Rebates would be too low / insufficient) 4. (That the audit wouldn’t find anything / my home was too efficient) Ref.: 5725 101 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text outlines reasons for dissatisfaction with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including high costs, low rebate amounts, and concerns about the audit process and recommendations. It also includes a satisfaction survey with options for rating the program experience.
fied with the program overall. What was the SINGLE most important reason you were not satisfied with the program overall? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASON. ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE] DO NOT READ 1. (The first or final energy audit took too long) 2. (I...
AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted to assess customer satisfaction with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on reasons for dissatisfaction and specific aspects of the program. It includes questions about the audit process, cost, rebate size, and evaluator experience.
DK/Ref Neither Very a. The First Energy Audit Overall (This was the first audit of your home's energy use that identified ways to make it more energy efficient) 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 b. Scheduling and timing of the first audit 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 c....
AI summary The text presents a survey or evaluation form related to an energy audit, focusing on aspects such as the first energy audit, scheduling, courtesy of the Energy Advisor, information provided, and the quality of the report received regarding home energy use and recommendations for energy-efficient upgrades.
current energy use and recommendations for energy efficient upgrades 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 f. The Final Energy Audit Overall (This was the final audit of your home's energy use to confirm the energy efficient upgrades that you had installed.) 1...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on customer satisfaction with energy audits and rebate provisions. It highlights dissatisfaction with the audit process and the need for feedback on specific issues.
and/or final energy audit that was done of your home. What was the SINGLE most important reason you were dissatisfied? [DO NOT READ. PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE] 1. (The energy audit took too long) 2. (I did not agree w...
AI summary The text presents a survey questionnaire focused on customer dissatisfaction with home energy audits and recommended upgrades. It asks for the single most important reason for dissatisfaction and explores additional reasons if applicable. The questionnaire also verifies which energy upgrades were recommended for the home.
stic water heating system j. High efficiency ductless mini split heat pump k. Electric water heater tank insulation l. Electric water heater exposed pipe insulation Ref.: 5725 104 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary The text outlines a series of energy efficiency recommendations and questions related to their implementation under the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes options for responding to whether upgrades were implemented and which specific recommendations were followed.
implemented under the program? [ASK FOR EACH ITEM IN VR1a thru l = 1] [1 = YES, IMPLEMENTED, 2 = NO, NOT IMPLEMENTED, 98 = DON’T KNOW / DON'T REMEMBER, 99 = REFUSED] READ a. High efficiency air to air (or air source) heat pump with electri...
AI summary The text refers to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program and asks whether participants have implemented any recommended upgrades on their own since participating in the program. It lists various energy efficiency measures and includes a reference to an evaluation report from 2011.
ll through the program. SO1. Since the time that you participated in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, have you implemented one or more of the recommended upgrades on your own? 1. (Yes) 2. (No) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) [IF S...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, asking participants whether they implemented recommended energy efficiency upgrades and if they received financing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs.
ates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs? 1. Yes [Go to NP1] 2. No 98. (Don’t know) [Go to NP1] 99. (Refused) [Go to NP1] [IF SO3 = 2] SO4. How influential was your experience with the Program on your decision to implement some or a...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions related to participation in an energy efficiency program, specifically the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, and reasons for non-participation or non-installation of recommended upgrades. It includes response options and instructions for data collection.
5. (Don’t think I really need it) 6. (Rebate not big enough) 7. (Want to install other upgrades that aren’t covered) 8. (Plan to install in the future) Ref.: 5725 107 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions from an evaluation report on the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, focusing on reasons participants did not install recommended energy-efficient measures and assessing whether participants had pre-existing plans for the upgrades.
ade the decision to implement the energy efficiency upgrades you implemented through the program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 108 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Eval...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participants' actions in the absence of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, focusing on whether they would have implemented the same energy efficiency upgrades, used standard equipment, or delayed the upgrades.
ame energy efficiency upgrades that you implemented through the program, but at a later date? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused IF FR2c > 5, then ask: FR2cc. DO NOT ASK FR2cc IF DON’T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your res...
AI summary This text is a survey question related to the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, asking respondents about the likelihood and timing of implementing energy efficiency upgrades without the program. It also provides alternative response options for respondents who have difficulty specifying a timeframe.
4. 2 to less than 3 years later? 5. 3 to less than 4 years later? 6. 4 or more years later? 7. (Never) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FR3. Efficiency Nova Scotia gave you a rebate for the energy efficiency upgrades you implemented in your...
AI summary The text presents survey questions regarding customer experiences with Efficiency Nova Scotia's rebate program for energy efficiency upgrades in homes, including questions about timing, willingness to pay, and the importance of program incentives.
Responses (READ AND RANDOMIZE) a. The program incentive _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused b. Information or advice provided by the program _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused c. Information or advice from the energy audit _ Response...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions related to a program's impact on comfort levels in homes, including responses to incentives, information provided, and changes in comfort due to energy efficiency measures. The questions focus on user experiences with energy efficiency programs and their effects.
bly fewer drafts throughout home) 4. (Provided longer lasting hot water) 5. (Reduced the noise level of replaced appliances) 96. (Other [SPECIFY _]) Ref.: 5725 111 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 20...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions from an evaluation report on the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program in Nova Scotia, focusing on the perceived effects of energy efficiency measures on energy bills and receptivity to additional upgrades not covered by the program.
like to have covered by the program? PROBE: Anything else? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC UPGRADES; ACCEPT MULTIPLE] 1 2 3 Ref.: 5725 112 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report RECOMMENDATIONS...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including offering more eligible products, improving communication, and advertising the program more effectively. It also asks participants whether a visual guide would have facilitated their participation in the program.
ses program have facilitated your participation in the program? Would you say it would have facilitated your participation in the program significantly, somewhat, slightly or not at all? 1. Significantly 2. Somewhat 3. Slightly 4. Not at a...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from an evaluation report on the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks respondents about their participation in the program and demographic information about their residence.
: +1 (418) 692-4899 www.econoler.com FUEL SUBSTITUTION PILOT IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION 2011 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report February 20, 2012 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Re...
AI summary This document is the final report of an evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It provides an analysis of the pilot's impact and process, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and their outcomes.
PROTOCOL ..................................................................................... 50 APPENDIX VII – ALGORITHM FOR FREE-RIDERSHIP CALCULATION......................................... 53 Ref.: 5725 iii Fuel Substitution Pilot Ef...
AI summary This document outlines a fuel substitution pilot program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, with an evaluation report detailing its outcomes and findings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2011 process and impact evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot. The 2011 evaluation was based on one in-depth interview...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), which provides financial incentives to homeowners to reduce electricity use for heating and domestic hot water. The program had 296 participants and achieved 1.570 GWh in net energy savings, meeting expectations of 1.8 GWh.
am has great potential for success considering that it was a pilot. The program totalled 296 participants for the year 2011. In terms of net energy savings, the program generated 1.570 GWh. Awareness In its current form, the Fuel Substitut...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot program had 296 participants in 2011, generating 1.570 GWh in energy savings. Awareness was primarily through retail stores, highlighting the importance of commercial partners. The program lacks delivery agents and requires better promotion and upstream advertising to increase participation and impact.
ore they are at the stage of shopping. This aims to influence decision making of homeowners who have not already decided to replace or substitute their electric space heating/DHW system. Satisfaction Satisfaction towards the pilot was very...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot was highly satisfactory to participants, with no dissatisfaction reported. The program achieved net energy savings of 1.570 GWh and demand savings of 0.785 MW in 2011. A 42% free-ridership level was identified, but no spillover effects were found.
0.58 The evaluation revealed that the Fuel Substitution Pilot had generated net energy savings of 1.570 GWh at the generator and demand savings of 0.785 MW at the generator in 2011. Ref.: 5725 vi Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Sco...
AI summary The evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot in 2011 found that it generated net energy savings of 1.570 GWh and demand savings of 0.785 MW at the generator. These results were higher than the tracked savings due to differences in the NTGR value used in the evaluation compared to the one applied by the project manager.
d savings. The NTGR value in the tracked savings varied from 1 for natural gas heating systems to as low as 0.23 for natural gas DHW systems compared to the 0.58 value calculated for the evaluation. RECOMMENDATIONS Building on lessons lear...
AI summary The document discusses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program and its potential transformation into a service promoting green heating systems. It highlights the need for partnerships, awareness campaigns, and collaboration with stores to increase participation and effectiveness of the program.
information on the heating load provided by a secondary heating source would give a basis for savings adjustment when high usage of a secondary heating source is identified. Fuel-R4. Conduct a billing analysis in order to evaluate energy c...
AI summary The document discusses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on evaluating energy consumption for heating through billing analysis and targeting participants for natural gas system installations to reduce free-ridership and increase energy savings.
iciency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) launched the Fuel Substitution Pilot in 2011. This pilot targets all existing homes across Nova...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) launched the Fuel Substitution Pilot in 2011 to encourage homeowners to reduce electricity use for heating and domestic hot water by substituting with alternative sources such as wood, pellet stoves, or natural gas. The program offers incentives and rebates for replacing electric systems with new heating solutions and includes a multi-channel marketing strategy.
natural gas additional eligibility. The marketing strategy for this pilot includes a series of activities including radio, newspaper and online advertising, web presence, direct mails and home shows. Since Fuel Substitution is a pilot, no...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot aims to reduce natural gas usage through marketing activities and financial incentives. A logic model outlines the program's approach, linking external factors, resources, and activities to expected market changes. No official target was set, but net savings of 1.8 GWh were expected in 2011.
Excel Database Conversion partners 6 Customers who have electric Wood Energy Customers who are Target space and/or water heating Technology Transfer close to an Audience systems or consume at least (WETT) certified unconnected gas line 21,...
AI summary The text outlines a target audience for an energy efficiency program, focusing on customers with electric space and/or water heating systems or those consuming at least 21,000 kWh/year. It also mentions a short-term outcome related to replacing or substituting old electric equipment with natural gas or wood/pellet equipment, and references Wood Energy Technology Transfer (WETT) certified professionals.
/or water heating equipment with natural gas or Outcome wood/pellet equipment 12 Medium- Reduce home heating & Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Term hot water costs associated 13 from electricity generation produced Outcome with electricity...
AI summary The document outlines the outcomes of a fuel substitution pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, aiming to reduce home heating and hot water costs through the use of natural gas or wood/pellet equipment, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and energy dependence.
y questionnaire are included in Appendices IV and V. Figure 2: Methodological Model 2.2 METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION 2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Pilot Information The first task in the process evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot was the anal...
AI summary The evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot involved analyzing existing documentation, conducting an interview with the Program Manager, and performing on-site visits to participating households to validate measures and gather data on energy usage.
iew with the PM as well as through a telephone survey of program participants. 3.2 PILOT MANUAL CONTENT Since Fuel Substitution is a pilot, the manual is not as exhaustive as a program manual. There is no perfect example of program manual...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot program manual outlines key components such as program description, objectives, incentives, eligibility criteria, and budget details. It is noted that the manual is not as comprehensive as a full program manual due to its pilot status. The table lists standard program manual content and what is included in the Fuel Substitution manual.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Fuel Substitution Program Manual Content Manual Market study or technical study that supports program elements or assumptions Marketing plan Evaluation plan Program theory Logic mod...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the Fuel Substitution Pilot program manual and found it contains useful information for the project manager and evaluator, including eligibility criteria and marketing initiatives. However, Econoler recommended documenting the source of calculations for rebates to improve internal tracking and modification.
tracking and modification purposes, the source of calculation for each rebate should be documented in the manual, including the presumed costs participants have to pay for each measure. > Add information to the pre-approval application for...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving the documentation and administrative processes of the Fuel Substitution Pilot program. It suggests including detailed cost information, an ID number, revision dates, and utility names in application forms, as well as providing a 'base case' for validating assumed savings calculations.
unique identification number that can be used as a reference. The tracking sheet includes all projects for which an application was submitted, even if the project was not approved or is not completed. All customer information necessary to...
AI summary The tracking sheet contains all submitted project applications, including customer information and energy savings calculations. A discrepancy was found in one project where savings were double the prescriptive savings, but the PM justified it with a billing analysis. Energy savings are defined by the PM based on the type of system selected, with prescriptive savings estimates from Dunsky Energy Consulting in 2010.
en calculated by using the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) also estimated in the Dunsky study. 3 Dunsky Energy Consulting, Residential Fuel Substitution Pilot Program, Final report, December 2010. Ref.: 5725 8 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights the need for improvements in tracking sheet consistency and the evaluation process. It recommends clearly defining project status and collecting details on heating and Domestic Hot Water system capacity to better justify savings claims.
vings allocated by the PM to the new measure implemented, especially in situations where values different from the prescriptive value are used. 3.4 PILOT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION Following the analysis of all pilot elements, the Evaluator...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot is seen as a promising initiative to reduce electricity use for home heating and water heating, lower secondary energy production from coal or oil, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the pilot lacks an evaluation plan, which Econoler strongly recommends developing in parallel with program design to ensure rigorous evaluation and data collection.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.5 ENSC WEBSITE Customers can consult the ENSC website to find a large amount of information regarding the pilot, such as rebate amounts and eligibility criteria. However, Econoler...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights issues with the ENSC website, such as undefined acronyms, and discusses how participants learned about the Fuel Substitution Pilot, with 50% learning about it from the store where they purchased equipment.
age Gas 4% Print brochure 4% Other 14% Ref.: 5725 10 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.2 Participation Motivations and Barriers The main reason for participating in the pilot is to save o...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot evaluation report indicates that 86% of participants were motivated by energy cost savings, with additional motivations including home efficiency, comfort, and environmental benefits. Communications should highlight energy bill savings as the primary incentive for participation.
tional comfort and help the environment. Communications should emphasize to customers the opportunities to save on energy bills since it is by far the main motivation for participating in the pilot. Table 6: Reasons for Participating 2011...
AI summary The document discusses customer motivations for participating in a pilot program, with saving on energy costs being the primary reason. Only a small percentage of participants expressed concerns about the efficiency of the new heating system.
e Size 28 Yes 4% No 96% Ref.: 5725 11 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report One in 10 respondents (11%) reported that there had been challenges or barriers faced when implementing the new measure...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot faced minor challenges, with 11% of respondents reporting barriers such as pellet stove installation, pellet availability, and cost. However, overall, no significant barriers were identified, suggesting the pilot was generally successful.
28 Yes 11% No 89% 3.6.3 Pilot Influence Survey respondents were asked questions about the influence of the pilot on their decision to replace or substitute their space heating system or domestic hot water system. According to their respons...
AI summary The pilot rebate was found to be important in influencing respondents' decisions to replace or substitute their space heating or domestic hot water systems, with a mean rating of 7.5. Information or advice provided through the pilot was also considered important, with a mean rating of 6.8.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.4 Impacts of the Pilot Three in 10 respondents have noticed that their energy bills have gone down since the new measure was implemented under the Fuel Substitution Pilot (29%)....
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Fuel Substitution Pilot indicates that 29% of respondents saw a decrease in energy bills, while 46% felt the time since implementation was too short to assess changes. Additionally, 75% of respondents reported improved interest in energy efficiency, and 57% noted increased knowledge.
where 5 is “considerable improvement”) since participating in the Fuel Substitution Pilot. Just under six in 10 reported that there had been improvement in their knowledge of energy efficiency (57%). Table 11: Improvements since Participat...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot has led to considerable improvement in interest and knowledge of energy efficiency, with 54% and 57% of participants reporting improvement, respectively. Nearly all respondents (96%) expressed satisfaction with the pilot program.
han nine in 10 respondents who are satisfied with all aspects evaluated. Notably, no respondent offered a rating of 1 or 2 (where 1 is “very dissatisfied”) for any of the aspects under consideration. Table 13: Satisfaction with Pilot Aspec...
AI summary The table shows high satisfaction levels among respondents regarding various aspects of the pilot program. Most respondents rated their experience with ENSC staff, rebate amounts, and eligibility confirmation as very satisfied. However, satisfaction levels were lower for aspects like the ease of understanding information and the time required to receive rebates.
application, forms and associated 28 64% 32% 4% paperwork Don’t know/no answer removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 14 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report All participants would recommend the F...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot received high satisfaction, with all participants recommending it to others. Most respondents did not suggest improvements, though some mentioned better advertising, communication, or higher rebates.
while under one in 10 mentioned improving communication (7%) or increasing the rebate amount (7%). Over six in 10 respondents (61%) did not offer recommendations as to how the pilot could be improved. Worthy of note is that one respondent...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that most participants in the Fuel Substitution Pilot did not provide recommendations for improvement, with only a small percentage suggesting better advertising, improved communication, or increased rebate amounts. One participant noted difficulty in finding the application form online.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Just under six in 10 respondents believe a diagram illustrating the steps involved in the program would have facilitated their participation, with 36 percent offering a rating of “s...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation indicates that a diagram illustrating the steps of the pilot program was viewed as beneficial by 36% of respondents, who felt it significantly facilitated their participation, while 21% found it somewhat helpful.
d for this particular project, the latter was not considered for the remainder of the impact evaluation. Table 17 presents the number of projects completed for each type of heating system installed. Table 17: Total Number of Projects Compl...
AI summary The text discusses the distribution of heating system installations and their energy savings, highlighting that most systems were wood and pellet stoves. Despite fewer installations, pellet and natural gas furnace or boiler systems required on-site visits. Preferred regions for site selection include Halifax, Dartmouth, Sydney, Coldbrook, Kentville, and Pictou County.
on. The following regions were considered for site selection: > Halifax; > Dartmouth; > Sydney and North Sydney; > Coldbrook and Kentville; and > Pictou County. Ref.: 5725 18 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011...
AI summary The document outlines the regions considered for site selection and details the on-site visit protocols and gross savings estimation for the Fuel Substitution Pilot conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It describes the collection of information on heating and hot water systems and the calculation of gross savings based on a pilot tracking sheet.
acking sheet and for the evaluation, as well as the details as to how each value was obtained. Most savings were established for systems installed in single-family dwellings, except for one case.
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of savings established for systems installed in single-family dwellings, with most savings being documented except for one case. It highlights the need for detailed information on how each value was obtained.
22,206 10.34 - Wood Pellet Boilers 16,433 7.75 - Combo Pellet Boilers 22,206 7.75 - Propane Furnaces 16,802 7.57 - Natural Gas Boilers for Multi-Family - 42,535 47.53 Dwellings (MF) Natural Gas Condensing DHW - 5,370 0.63 Systems Propane T...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot evaluation report found that most systems installed through the pilot were used as the main heating source. However, two sites used the new systems for only 25% and 50% of their heating needs, respectively, and only one site had a supplemental heating source before the pilot.
nt of its heating needs. Moreover, information on usage of the old heat source was also collected and revealed that only one site had a supplemental heating source prior to participating in the pilot. No correction factor was established b...
AI summary The document discusses findings from a pilot program on fuel substitution, highlighting the collection of data on heating sources and the need to investigate the proportion of heating load provided by secondary sources before and after fuel substitution. Gross savings from the pilot are also calculated and presented.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives and programs in Nova Scotia.
05 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 Total Gross Energy Savings – at Generator 1.305 1.153 0.109 0 0 0.074 0.054 0 0 0 0.012 0 (GWh) Demand Savings Unitary demand savings 4.00 4.00 7.66 7.66 7.66 10.34 7.66 10.34 7.57 4...
AI summary The document presents data on energy and demand savings from a pilot program, including total gross energy savings and demand savings at different points. It references an evaluation report on the Fuel Substitution Pilot Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, which includes a section on the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) calculated using a self-report approach from participant surveys.
articipants who installed a natural gas heating system replace or substitute electric appliances with natural gas appliances, following or during their participation in the pilot due to its influence. During the telephone survey, the parti...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot Program's net savings were calculated using the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) of 0.58. The pilot's net savings were estimated as 1.300 GWh based on gross savings of 2.741 GWh. The NTGR was derived from free-ridership and spillover levels, with no spillover identified due to the lack of additional natural gas appliance installations by participants.
whether positive or negative. These parameters are usually based on past evaluation results, market intelligence, secondary research and other sources. The pilot manual should document these parameters so that the PM and the Evaluator can...
AI summary The text discusses the need for clear documentation of parameters in a pilot manual, the importance of defining project status in a tracking sheet, and the collection of details on heating and domestic hot water system capacity to justify savings allocations in the Fuel Substitution Pilot Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an analysis of their energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
a delivery agent (DA) would be useful along with competent subcontractors in order to have a better control on program implementation. The DA could be involved once the program generates enough participants. ENSC Website 10. Define acronym...
AI summary The text discusses improvements for program implementation, including the use of a delivery agent and subcontractors, defining acronyms on the ENSC website, emphasizing energy bill savings in communications, investigating secondary heating system usage, and increasing natural gas system installations in future programs.
install natural gas systems, despite the fact that few potential participants have access to the natural gas network compared to other energy sources. Ref.: 5725 28 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation...
AI summary The document discusses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlighting its marketing strategy and performance indicators aimed at attracting participants. It mentions the use of various communication media and activities to promote the program.
significant number of etc. participants. Analyses of the performance indicators will tell which strategy or strategies attracted more participants. 2 Subsidies are not given for just any The list of minimum efficiency standards by equipmen...
AI summary The program includes efficiency standards, financial incentives, and application forms. Heritage Gas (HG) collaborates with ENSC, offering additional rebates for natural gas conversions. Eligibility and rebate applications are tracked in a database and Excel sheet.
ulative rebate additional rebate for customers who wish that exceeds 100 percent of the total to convert to natural gas. substitution cost. Ref.: 5725 29 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Fue...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation involves offering rebates to customers converting to natural gas, with additional incentives for those who convert. The program includes marketing strategies, inspections, and requirements such as WETT certificates for safety and efficiency.
the electrical system (if efficiency purposes. applicable) and proceeds with the acquisition, installation and inspection of the new energy system. 11 The Heritage Gas rebate contributes to Data from Heritage Gas related to rebates increas...
AI summary The text discusses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlighting benefits such as cost savings for participants, reduced electricity generation, and decreased greenhouse gas emissions. It also notes the use of local resources like wood and pellets, contributing to energy self-sufficiency in the province.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX III - DEMOGRAPHICS The majority of respondents reside in a detached single-family home (86%). Seven in 10 respondents have a home with three bedrooms (68%), and one in 10 h...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation provides demographic data, indicating that most respondents live in detached single-family homes, with most households having two or three people. The data includes statistics on the number of bedrooms and household sizes.
2011 Sample Size 28 Male 57% Female 43 Ref.: 5725 33 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV - INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: Fuel Substitution Pi...
AI summary This document contains an interview guide for the Fuel Substitution Pilot Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). It includes questions and comments related to the program's implementation, such as equipment disposal, incentive calculations, and the clarity of program materials.
notice that natural gas equipment have no capacity specified. Care to comment? Q: The incentives have been calculated based on what exactly: uninstalling, acquisition, installation and inspection? Ref.: 5725 34 Fuel Substitution Pilot Effi...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions and comments regarding the Fuel Substitution Pilot program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). Topics include program incentives, participant responsibilities, form requirements, and verification processes for eligibility and cost calculations.
ility) Q: 10th point: about receiving more incentives than the total cost. How do you verify this? And what happens if you have such a case? Rebate Application form: This form needs a revision date. C: The logic model was developed by the...
AI summary The text includes questions about program evaluation, incentive verification, and cost-effectiveness testing. It references a 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and discusses program partners, assumptions about distortion effects, and the use of social cost tests for emission reduction.
base? (1 is very difficult 10 is very easy) Q: Do you have any other subject you wish us to investigate with the program partners who will be part of the process evaluation? Thank you very much. Ref.: 5725 36 Fuel Substitution Pilot Effici...
AI summary The document includes a survey questionnaire from the Fuel Substitution Pilot Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), aimed at participants who substituted electric heating with alternative sources in 2011. It outlines screening and introduction steps for surveying participants.
involved and familiar with deciding about the program? [IF NO, ASK TO SPEAK TO THE APPROPRIATE PERSON: “May I please speak to the person who knows the most about the heating system in your house?”] [IF APPROPRIATE PERSON] We are trying to...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for gathering customer feedback on the Fuel Substitution Pilot Program, emphasizing confidentiality and participation verification. It includes prompts for confirming participation and identifying the appropriate person to speak with.
NO, ASK TO SPEAK TO THE APPROPRIATE PERSON AND RESTART AT INTRODUCTION. IF PERSISTS AS NO, THANK, TERMINATE AND RECORD.] Program Notoriety and Participation [P series] P1. How did you learn about the Fuel Substitution Program? PROBE: Anyth...
AI summary The text outlines how respondents learned about the Fuel Substitution Program through various channels, including mail, email, websites, homeshows, and word of mouth. It also references an evaluation report from 2011 by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the Fuel Substitution Pilot.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report P2. Now I’m going to ask you to think back to when you decided to supplement your electric space heating or completely replace it with another heating source or system and participa...
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on participant motivations and concerns in the Fuel Substitution Program. It includes survey questions about reasons for switching heating systems, concerns, and responses related to cost, efficiency, and environmental impact.
d) 5. (The process would take too long) 6. (My insurance would increase) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _]) 98. Don’t know 99. Refused Ref.: 5725 39 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Program Satisfacti...
AI summary The text includes survey questions from the Fuel Substitution Pilot program evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on participant satisfaction and reasons for dissatisfaction with the program.
unt (rebate)) 8. (There are too many verifications from Efficiency Nova Scotia) 96. (Other, [specify: _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) S3. [IF S1 = 1 or 2] Were there any other reasons you were dissatisfied? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS....
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Fuel Substitution Program, including aspects like program application, communication with Efficiency Nova Scotia, rebate amounts, and installation of systems. It also includes a question about whether participants had already considered replacing their heating systems prior to the program.
em with another heating source before you heard about the Fuel Substitution Program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) [IF FR1=YES] FR1a. Before you decided to participate in the Fuel Substitution Program, had you already made th...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation in the Fuel Substitution Program and asks respondents about their likelihood of taking alternative actions without the program. It also references an evaluation report on the Fuel Substitution Pilot by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR2b. …replaced or substituted your old space heating or domestic hot water system with another one that uses electricity? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused FR2c. ...replaced or...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the replacement of heating and domestic hot water systems with or without electricity, including follow-up questions about timing if the Fuel Substitution Program had not been available. It includes response options and instructions for handling specific answers.
4. 2 to less than 3 years later? 5. 3 to less than 4 years later? 6. 4 or more years later? 7. (Never) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 42 Fuel Substitution Pilot Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR3. Effi...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including questions about the timing of purchases and the importance of program rebates in decision-making.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses – DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE a. The program rebate _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused b. Information or advice provided _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused by the program c. Previous experience with a...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking participants if they converted additional equipment to gas after converting their heating system to gas, and what specific equipment was converted.
did you convert to gas while or after converting your heating system to gas? PROBE: Anything else? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT. DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE; 98 = DK, 99 = REFUSED] 1. (Stove) 2. (Clothes dryer) 3. (Other kitchen applianc...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Fuel Substitution Program, asking participants about their conversion to gas equipment, timing of decisions, and connection to gas utility networks, as well as the impact of energy conservation measures on energy bills.
M1. Since this new equipment was installed under the program, what changes, if any, have you noticed in your energy bills? Have ... READ STATEMENTS IN ORDER - RECORD ONE RESPONSE 1. Your bills gone down 2. Your bills gone up, or 3. Has the...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the impact of the Fuel Substitution Program on participants' energy bills, knowledge of energy efficiency, and barriers faced in implementing new equipment or energy sources. The questions are part of an evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) B2. [If B1 = 1 “Yes”] What was the SINGLE most important challenge or barrier? (DO NOT READ - ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE) 1. (Concern that actual bill savings would be less than estimated) 2. (Lack of informat...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about barriers to participation in a program and customer recommendations, with references to the Fuel Substitution Pilot and an evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
va Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report VP2. [IF VP1 = 2 “NO”] Why not? [DO NOT READ – multiple responses] 1. (Is not worth the expenses) 2. (No family members or friends that could be eligible) 3. (Concern that actual bill savings wo...
AI summary The text presents survey responses regarding the Fuel Substitution Program, including reasons for non-participation and recommendations for program improvements, such as offering more products, increasing rebate amounts, and improving communication.
Program have facilitated your participation in the program? Would you say it would have facilitated your participation in the program significantly, somewhat, slightly or not at all? 1. Significantly 2. Somewhat 3. Slightly 4. Not at all 9...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to program participation, residence type, bedroom count, and home occupancy, collected for statistical purposes and kept confidential.
000 - $34,999 4. $35,000 - $49,999 5. $50,000 - $69,999 6. $70,000 - $79,999 7. $80,000 or more 99. (Refused) D10. [DO NOT READ] Gender 1. Male 2. Female [READ: THAT IS ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE FOR YOU. THANK AND TERMINATE.] Ref.: 5725 49...
AI summary The document outlines an on-site visit protocol for the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including sections for general information and measures related to home heating systems before conversion.
they still have the equipment or some documentation): Secondary energy source for heating before conversion and % of total heating of the building envelope provided (electric, natural gas, etc.): Ref.: 5725 50 Fuel Substitution Pilot Effic...
AI summary The document outlines data collection requirements for a fuel substitution pilot program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on heating systems before and after conversion, including energy sources, system types, and efficiency ratings.
E – New heating system installed Model name/number - New heating system installed Is the equipment ENERGY STAR® certified (YES/NO)? Is electric back-up still in use? If yes, what is the % usage? Ref.: 5725 51 Fuel Substitution Pilot Effici...
AI summary The text contains forms and data collection templates related to heating system installations and energy efficiency evaluations, including ENERGY STAR® certification checks and fuel substitution details. It references an evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, focusing on the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
rch conducted by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) indicated that the “Low Income Program” name was best suited for the program, efforts will have to be put forth to eliminate all confusion in the market. Program partners identified the main b...
AI summary The Low Income Program's name is deemed appropriate, though efforts are needed to eliminate market confusion. Program partners identified participant enrolment as a main barrier, but a new delivery model implemented in 2011 aims to address this by offering direct installs and conducting initial audits. Participant satisfaction is high, and program partners are also satisfied with the program and their collaboration with ENSC. Energy savings are calculated using EnerGuide points and prescriptive measures.
tion with the implementation of a series of prescriptive measures. An initial methodology using a billing analysis was planned, but after a preliminary analysis of the participant database, Econoler Ref.: 5725 vi Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The evaluation of the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011 showed net energy savings of 7.636 GWh and demand savings of 1.632 MW. The program's net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) was assumed to be 1 due to minimal distortion effects.
acked Savings from ENSC 1.513 MW 1.513 MW 1.00 1.513 MW Evaluation Results 1.744 MW 1.632 MW 1.00 1.632 MW These net evaluated savings were slightly higher than those tracked by ENSC by approximately 8 percent for the net energy and demand...
AI summary The evaluation of energy savings from the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) program found that net evaluated savings were slightly higher than those tracked by ENSC. Adjustments to unitary savings of lighting products, programmable thermostats, and low-flow fittings were the main factors contributing to this difference.
mind, Econoler believes that on-site visits aiming at validating the installation rate of the Direct Install products should be performed under future project evaluations. LI-R2. Review HOT2000 models on a random basis: The Evaluator or th...
AI summary Econoler suggests that future project evaluations should include on-site visits to validate the installation rate of Direct Install products. Additionally, a random review of HOT2000 models and detailed record-keeping by energy advisors is recommended, with a focus on projects with outlier EnerGuide ratings.
In addition, the PM should target projects with outlier values, such as an initial EnerGuide rating below 20 or an increase of the EnerGuide rating by more than 40 points. LI-R3. Ensure the final audits are completed after the implementati...
AI summary The text discusses the need to target projects with outlier EnerGuide ratings and ensures final audits are completed after the implementation of energy efficiency measures. It references delays in 2011 due to increased participation in the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program and the use of temporary estimates for savings calculations.
Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Low Income program is aimed at facilitating the implementation of cost-effective electrical-saving measures in residential low-incom...
AI summary The Low Income program, administered by ENSC, provides energy efficiency measures for low-income households in Nova Scotia. It includes two scopes of work, with funding sources varying based on heating type. Eligibility is determined by income and home ownership criteria, and delivery agents conduct energy audits and implement measures.
to the estimated use of electric space heating. When the home has multiple fuel sources, the DA will estimate, after talking with the homeowner, the percentage of heating supplied by each fuel source. Scope II covers the implementation of...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency measures in homes, including the use of electric space heating and the replacement of non-efficient appliances with ENERGY STAR®-qualified models. It also highlights a pilot project conducted by the Low Income Program in two First Nations communities in Nova Scotia, which involved the direct installation of energy-efficient products.
2011 Evaluation Report savings resulting from this pilot project were claimed with the savings of the Low Income program in the impact evaluation. In 2011, the program had a net energy savings goal of 4.70 GWh and 1.00 MW for demand saving...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the Low Income Program's energy savings goals, including a net energy savings target of 4.70 GWh and 1.00 MW for demand savings. It also references a program logic model and methodology used in the evaluation.
esults of the PM interview, the list of questions and topics to include in the program partner interviews for the process evaluation was finalized. 2.2.3 In-Depth Interviews with Program Partners In September, in-depth interviews were cond...
AI summary The document outlines the evaluation process for a low-income energy efficiency program, including interviews with program partners, on-site visits to validate compliance with EnerGuide guidelines, and a telephone survey of 70 participants conducted by CRA in Halifax.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report pending the final audit, the tracking sheet provides a temporary estimation of the savings based on a projection of the final EnerGuide rating (E). This projection is made during th...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) uses a temporary estimation method for energy savings, applying a 75% realization rate for envelope measures due to incomplete final audits in 2011. The tracking sheet includes prescriptive measure savings calculated directly in cells for easier tracking. The Program Manager (PM) finds the sheet somewhat user-friendly but acknowledges its complexity.
and analyze. Additionally, the program tracking sheet was evaluated by the PM during the interview. The PM is somewhat satisfied with the tracking sheet and considers it moderately easy to work with. To facilitate the use of the program tr...
AI summary The program tracking sheet used by the Program Manager (PM) is found to be moderately easy to work with but could be improved by adding complementary information and standardizing entries. The EEH program previously collaborated with Natural Resources Canada’s ecoENERGY Retrofit Homes program before its rebate ended in 2010, and ENSC’s Team Buy initiatives allowed customers to save money by pooling purchases.
ed as part of the EEH program where customers could save money by uniting to buy the same product. For more information on the Team Buy approach, visit the following website: http://www.teambuy.ca/. Ref.: 5725 10 Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The text discusses the need for a verification protocol to identify inconsistencies in the tracking sheet and the recommendation to use energy consumption data from HOT2000 for more accurate energy savings calculations within the Low Income Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
ate them with the energy consumption data of HOT2000. Econoler proposes adding fields for building energy consumption per year in kWh for D and E audits. 3.4 PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION Following the analysis of all program elements,...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of developing an evaluation plan in parallel with program design for ENSC’s program portfolio, emphasizing the need for rigorous evaluation and data collection to ensure effective program delivery and impact assessment.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.5 ON-SITE VISITS The on-site visits conducted as part of the evaluation of the Low Income program aimed at assessing the procedure and the ecoEnergy protocol that the energy advis...
AI summary The on-site visits for the Low Income program were evaluated to assess adherence to the ecoEnergy protocol. Advisors followed procedures well, but there were opportunities for improvement. The evaluation noted proper data collection and timing aligned with protocol guidelines.
or the two E audits. Nevertheless, the Evaluator identified a number of opportunities for improving on-site visit effectiveness. In light of the on-site visit evaluation, the Evaluator recommends to: > Explain in detail the protocol to the...
AI summary The Evaluator identified opportunities to improve the effectiveness of on-site visits during energy audits. Recommendations include explaining the program protocol in detail to clients and spending more time explaining household energy use basics to enhance understanding and project success.
ould be provided to the participants, especially because this issue represents a high energy savings potential in low-income households when compared to typical residential buildings. Ref.: 5725 12 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of providing informational materials to low-income households participating in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the potential for significant energy savings and the need for improved understanding of energy efficiency measures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.1 Program Awareness Similar to previous years, word of mouth (17%) or receiving a letter about the program (13%) are the primary ways in which participants found out about the p...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights that word of mouth and letters are the primary ways participants learned about Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation programs, with other sources such as newspapers and bill inserts being less effective in reaching a broad audience.
ee services (9%) and making home improvements (9%) are other reasons mentioned by respondents for participating in the program. Table 6: Reasons for Participating
AI summary Respondents participated in the program for reasons such as receiving energy efficiency services and making home improvements, each cited by 9% of participants.
2009 2010 2011 Most Other Most Other Most Other Reasons for Important Reasons for Important Reasons for Important Reasons for Participating Motivation Participating Motivation Participating Motivation Participating Sample Size 55 52 62 56...
AI summary The table presents survey results from 2009 to 2011 regarding reasons customers participated in energy efficiency programs. Key motivations included saving on energy costs, improving insulation, and receiving free services like CFLs and power bars. Participation varied by year and reason, with energy cost savings being a consistent motivator.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.3 Measures In-Service Eleven percent of respondents chose not to implement some measures recommended by the program, which is consistent with last year’s findings. The eight res...
AI summary Eleven percent of respondents did not implement some recommended energy efficiency measures, such as dehumidifiers and building envelope improvements. Reasons included skepticism about energy bill reductions and concerns about disruption.
Table 8: Chose Not to Implement Recommended Measures Chose Not to Implement Recommended 2009 2010 2011 Measures Sample Size 55 62 70 Yes 4% 11% 11% No 96 87 84 Don’t know/refused 2 4 Measures Not Implemented 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 2 7...
AI summary The table summarizes the implementation of recommended energy efficiency measures from 2009 to 2011. It shows that the majority of respondents did not implement the measures, with a small percentage indicating they did. Specific measures not implemented include dehumidifiers, building envelope improvements, and replacement of inefficient lighting and appliances.
1 Low-flow faucet aerators 1 Electric kettles with auto shut-off 1 Don’t know/refused 1 Reason 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 2 6 8 Did not believe any changes would result in 2 1 lower energy bills Hassle factor, too much disruption to my dai...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that very few participants in the Low Income Program removed energy efficiency measures, with only 3% or 2 respondents doing so. One removed CFLs due to non-compatibility with dimmer switches, while another removed low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators, and power bars.
wo respondents removed CFLs while the other stated having removed low-flow showerheads, low-flow faucet aerators and power bars. The removal of CFLs was due to non-compatibility with dimmer switches. Table 9: Measure Removal Verification R...
AI summary The document discusses the removal of energy efficiency measures by respondents, with some removing CFLs due to dimmer switch incompatibility and others removing low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators, and power bars. A table summarizes the removal rates and specific measures removed.
ighting (54%). Finally, 49 percent believe that the measures have reduced the noise level because of the replaced appliances. Table 10: Specific Impacts on Comfort Specific Impacts on Comfort 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 55 62 70 Provided ev...
AI summary The text discusses survey results showing that 49% of respondents believe appliance replacements have reduced noise levels, and 70% noticed improved interest in energy efficiency. The data comes from a table tracking comfort improvements over time, including temperature control, drafts, and hot water longevity.
ponses Seven in 10 respondents have noticed improvements in their interest in energy efficiency (70%) while six in 10 respondents have seen improvements in their energy efficiency knowledge (58%). Table 11: Impact of Measures Impact of Mea...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that 70% of respondents noticed improved interest in energy efficiency, and 58% reported improved knowledge. Over 60% of participants believed the information from the energy evaluation changed their home energy behavior, such as turning off lights and adjusting thermostats.
stomers, electricity consumption for the last three years and the corresponding heating degree-days for each period and for each customer were assembled totalling 9,791 observations (billing periods). Before running the analysis, it was ne...
AI summary The analysis involved compiling electricity consumption and heating degree-day data for 9,791 billing periods. After filtering for participants with electrical space heating and valid winter billing periods, only 35 participants remained, making billing analysis unreliable. Energy and demand savings were instead calculated using unitary savings from the EEH program, with Econoler refining the data using survey outcomes. Net savings were evaluated using interactive effects factors and NTGR.
a using outcomes from the participant survey conducted with Low Income program participants. Finally, the program net savings were evaluated by applying the interactive effects factors and the NTGR. Ref.: 5725 26 Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Low Income Program's gross savings is based on the EEH program analysis, using unitary savings estimates from various studies, including a 2011 Ontario Power Authority report, to calculate savings for prescriptive measures implemented through different programs.
it performed. For the other 203 participants, the measures were implemented before the end of the year but since the emphasis was put on reaching new customers, many E audits were postponed to 2012. Ref.: 5725 27 Low Income Program Efficie...
AI summary The 2011 Low Income Program evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) used energy savings coefficients from the 2010 EEH program evaluation. ENS used 1,047 kWh per EnerGuide point, calculated based on the percentage of space heating load delivered by electricity. Econoler confirmed these figures through various analyses detailed in the EEH report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For establishing the EnerGuide point increase per project, Econoler used the final EnerGuide rating (given upon completion of the E audit) when this figure was available in the prog...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses how Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) calculated the EnerGuide point increase for projects, using either final EnerGuide ratings or projected ratings with an assumed realization rate of 75%. The report also mentions an adjustment to energy savings per EnerGuide point based on the percentage of space heating load delivered by electricity.
based on a metering study conducted for Hydro-Québec’s residential lighting program. The value used by ENSC (2.4 h/day) was estimated from participant declarations during a telephone survey. However, Ref.: 5725 29 Low Income Program Effici...
AI summary The document discusses the estimation of daily usage for CFLs, comparing data from a metering study by Hydro-Québec with estimates from participant declarations. It highlights the preference for metering data over self-declared estimates due to potential inaccuracies.
the respondents’ answers. The review resulted in a unitary savings value for 13 watt CFLs of 46.3 kWh, as shown below. ( ) 23 Watt CFLs For estimating the unitary savings value for 23 watt CFLs, the average displaced wattage was estimated...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings values for 13 watt and 23 watt CFLs, based on data from the Efficient Products – Direct Install program and ENERGY STAR equivalency tables. The displaced wattage for 23 watt CFLs was estimated at 70.5 W, leading to a savings value of 69.5 kWh.
( ) 10 Econoler, “Evaluation Report: Programme Produits Mieux Consommer – Éclairage résidentiel,” presented to Hydro- Québec, Quebec, March 30, 2011. Ref.: 5725 30 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Repor...
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of specialty CFLs and their energy savings, using data from Econoler's 2011 RMP evaluation and adjusting for daily usage based on a Hydro-Québec study. The unitary savings value was adjusted to 49.8 kWh per year, consistent with Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's calculations.
ent with that used by ENSC in its gross impact calculations; i.e., 41 kWh per year. ( ) 4.2.3 Flush-Mount CFLs and CFL Porch Lights In 2011, ENSC promoted the installation of flush-mount CFLs and CFL porch lights under the Low Income progr...
AI summary The 2011 Low Income Program by ENSC included the promotion of flush-mount CFLs and CFL porch lights with a unitary savings value of 34 kWh per year. These products accounted for a negligible portion of total program savings. Econoler opted to use a higher unitary savings value of 49.8 kWh per year for specialty CFLs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 CFL Torchieres ENSC estimated the unitary savings for CFL torchieres at 241 kWh per year. This figure was based on the Navigant study mentioned earlier. The assumptions used t...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy savings from CFL torchieres and LED nightlights. ENSC estimated 241 kWh/year for CFL torchieres but this was adjusted to 69.5 kWh/year based on Econoler's analysis. For LED nightlights, ENSC used a 26 kWh/year savings estimate based on a Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission technical reference manual.
htlights. The assumptions behind this savings calculation are presented in the table below. 13 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, “Technical Reference Manual,” Pennsylvania, June 2011. Ref.: 5725 32 Low Income Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations from replacing incandescent nightlights with LED nightlights under the Low Income Renter program. It provides parameters such as wattage, operating time, and annual savings, and references a technical manual from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
o replace old nightlights, which are traditionally made of a 7 W incandescent light. Such replacement resulted in an average displaced wattage of 6.7 W, which was used by Econoler for this evaluation. The 12-hour/day operation time used by...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for LED nightlights and programmable thermostats. It outlines the displaced wattage and operating time used to calculate unitary savings values, referencing the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and the OPA report for thermostat savings.
energy savings were calculated from the 14 National Research Council Canada, Sunrise/Sunset Calculator, Standard times of solar rise for Halifax, Nova Scotia, 2011, http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. Ref.: 5725 33 Low Income Program Efficiency Nov...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from programmable thermostats, referencing a study by Hydro-Québec and the Ontario Power Authority's consideration of a 1 percent savings value per degree setback. It also references an evaluation report on a low-income program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
mostat accuracy and by the temperature setback. The table below presents the results of this evaluation. Table 20: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec’s Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Calculation Parameters Duplex / Tr...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from electronic thermostats and temperature setbacks in different housing types. It presents data on gross energy savings, annual consumption, and savings per thermostat across single-detached homes, duplexes/triplexes, and apartments.
housing 4.33 1.66 1.91 Savings per thermostat [kWh] 100 201 118 For the calculation of savings due to the electronic thermostat accuracy, the percentages of savings were based on research supervised by Hydro-Québec’s laboratory of energy t...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from the use of electronic thermostats compared to bimetallic thermostats, based on research conducted by Hydro-Québec’s Laboratory of Energy Technologies. It includes data on housing, savings per thermostat, and references to studies and reports.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For the calculation of savings due to the temperature set back, the savings per housing resulted from a billing analysis regression which compared the consumption of houses with ele...
AI summary This evaluation report discusses the calculation of energy savings from thermostat replacements in Nova Scotia. It compares theoretical engineering calculations with field data from Hydro-Québec and LTE tests, and addresses the need to adjust savings based on housing types in the low-income market.
or townhouses (respectively 221 kWh per year and 295 kWh per year), it was deemed a conservative assumption to consider that 100 percent of all program participants resided in single-detached houses. In light of the above, Econoler estimat...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings estimates for various products installed under the Low Income program and First Nation pilot project, including programmable thermostats, electric kettles, and power bars with integrated timers. Econoler and ENSC used specific unitary savings values based on previous studies and evaluations.
rmed the proportion of 40 percent used for this electronic device. Therefore, Econoler continued using the unitary savings value of 53 kWh per year for the installed power bars with integrated timer. 4.2.9 Dehumidifiers The Low Income prog...
AI summary The Low Income Program promoted replacing inefficient dehumidifiers with more efficient models. Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) used a unitary savings value of 108 kWh per year for each replaced dehumidifier, based on a Wisconsin program evaluation. For this year's evaluation, the estimated savings per replaced dehumidifier was 686 kWh per year.
es Capacity of the Dehumidifier 17.4 litres per day Efficiency – Old Conventional Unit 0.66 litres/kWh Efficiency – New ENERGY STAR-Qualified Unit 1.50 litres/kWh Usage 1,114 hours per year Annual Unitary Savings 686 kWh The assumptions pr...
AI summary The document discusses the energy efficiency of dehumidifiers, comparing old and new models, and considers the impact of installing high-efficiency dehumidifiers in homes without prior appliances. It references evaluations of the Ontario Power Authority’s program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation’s approach to energy savings.
ed to keep a conservative approach and considered neither additional consumption nor energy savings for the new dehumidifiers installed in houses where there was no dehumidifier before the project. 19 The Cadmus Group, Evaluation of the On...
AI summary In 2011, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) promoted replacing old refrigerators with more efficient models through the Low Income program. A unitary savings value of 850 kWh per year was used, based on prior evaluations. Econoler estimated that replacing old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR models could save 817 kWh per year.
estimated at 1,104 kWh, from the annual consumption of new ENERGY STAR models, corresponding to 287 kWh on average. Table 23: Unitary Savings Calculation for Refrigerator Replacement Parameters Values Base Annual Consumption – Old Refriger...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from replacing inefficient refrigerators and freezers with ENERGY STAR models. Unitary savings figures are provided, based on evaluations from 2010 and 2011, showing significant reductions in annual energy consumption.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 24: Unitary Savings Calculation for Freezer Replacement Parameters Values Base Annual Consumption – Old Freezers 916 kWh New Annual Consumption – New Freezers 279 kWh Annual Unitary Savings 637 kWh 4.2.12 Refri...
AI summary In 2011, the Low Income program facilitated the retirement of old refrigerators, with ENSC using a unitary savings value of 776 kWh per year. This was based on the 2010 evaluation of the ARet program. Econoler estimated a higher average unitary savings value of 1,016 kWh per year for freezer retirements, calculated using data from the recycling facility.
igerators was obtained from the metering activity conducted at the recycling facility to measure the consumption of the old refrigerators retired through the ARet program. 4.2.13 Freezer Retirements The Low Income program promoted the reti...
AI summary The document discusses the retirement of inefficient freezers through the Low Income program and ARet program, noting that ENSC used a unitary savings figure of 705 kWh per year, while Econoler estimated 1,274 kWh per year based on consumption data from the ARet program recycling facility.
tor of 1.12. As for refrigerator retirements, the average consumption of old freezers was obtained from the metering activity conducted at the ARet program recycling facility. 4.2.14 Faucet Aerators In 2011, faucet aerators were installed...
AI summary The text discusses the estimation of unitary savings for faucet aerators installed through the Low Income program and First Nation pilot project. Econoler used the OPA unitary savings value of 176.3 kWh per year, considering it more appropriate than other studies due to its alignment with Canadian standards and prior acceptance for ENSC programs.
alues from the OPA were already deemed acceptable for most products promoted through ENSC programs. Therefore, the unitary savings value that was used in the current evaluation was 176.3 kWh per year. The OPA calculated an average unitary...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings values for faucet aerators and low-flow showerheads used in Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) programs. The savings values are based on data from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) and other sources, with specific assumptions made about installation locations and energy use.
werheads. In the OPA report, the annual savings for low-flow showerheads were calculated using the assumptions below. Table 26: OPA Unitary Savings Estimate for Low-Flow Showerheads Parameters Values Typical Flow Rate for a Low-Flow Shower...
AI summary The document discusses the energy savings from low-flow showerheads, using assumptions from the OPA report and verifying them with NRCan data. It notes that savings are calculated based on electricity as the energy source for water heating.
ed pipe size found in the OPA report. In addition, the Evaluator calculated savings for this product only when the energy used for domestic water heating was electricity. 4.2.17 Hot Water Tank Wraps Hot water tank wraps were installed in h...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from hot water tank wraps and low-flow showerheads under the Low Income program in 2011. It references savings estimates from the OPA report and the 2009 impact evaluation of the Low Income Homeowner program. The Evaluator considered only electricity usage for domestic water heating in calculating savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.18 Energy-to-Demand Ratio Econoler calculated the demand savings for the Low Income program based on an energy-to-demand ratio of 4.68 GWh/MW. This ratio was obtained from the a...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the calculation of demand savings for the Low Income program using an energy-to-demand ratio of 4.68 GWh/MW. It also presents revised gross savings for the program, including energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, using a line loss factor of 1.050 provided by ENSC.
Savings Program- Flush- CFL LED Power per 13 Watt 23 Watt Specialty CFL Tor- mable Electric Product Category EnerGuide CFLs CFLs CFLs Mount Porch chieres Night- Thermos- Kettles Bars with CFLs Lights lights Timer Point tats Energy Savings...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data across various product categories, including the number of units from low-income tracking sheets and the first nation direct install pilot. It highlights the distribution of energy-saving devices such as CFLs, LED lights, and other efficient products.
442 85 134 Nation Direct Install Pilot Total Number of Units 319 73,876 8,862 258 65 89 157 7,581 1,299 1,494 971 Unitary Savings (kWh) 817 46.3 69.5 49.8 49.8 49.8 69.5 29.3 221 49 53 Total Gross Energy Savings – 0.855 3.420 0.616 0.013 0...
AI summary The text presents data from the Nation Direct Install Pilot program, including the total number of units, unitary savings in kWh, and energy and demand savings at the meter and generator levels. The data includes line loss factors and energy-to-demand ratios for various categories.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, detailing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives undertaken during that period.
Dehumi- Hot New Fridge Freezer Fridge Freezer Low-Flow difier Faucet Pipe Water Product Category Repla- Dehumi- Repla- Repla- Retire- Retire- Aerators Shower- Insulation Tank difiers cement cement ment ment heads cement Wraps Energy Saving...
AI summary The document provides data on energy savings from various products and programs, including dehumidifiers, fridges, freezers, low-flow faucets, shower heads, and pipe insulation. It includes metrics such as the number of units installed, energy savings in kWh, and total gross energy savings in GWh.
270 Total Gross Energy Savings – 0.012 0.000 0.098 0.100 0.014 0.005 0.492 0.479 0.128 0.501 at the Meter (GWh) Line Loss Factor 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 Total Gross Energy Savings – 0.014 0.000 0.108 0.1...
AI summary The text presents tables with energy savings data and references an evaluation report on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, focusing on interactive effects.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements suc...
AI summary This section discusses interactive effects in energy efficiency programs, specifically how replacing inefficient lighting with CFLs or LEDs in low-income homes affects heating and cooling loads. A -9.8% interactive effects factor was applied based on a 1992 study, adjusted for modern construction practices.
sheet (all the empty cells and the “Other,” “N/A” and “?” entries were removed from this calculation). A total of 906 participant households from the 5,090 were mainly heated with electric systems. Ref.: 5725 46 Low Income Program Efficien...
AI summary The text discusses an evaluation of a low-income program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on interactive effects of energy-efficient lighting products in Nova Scotia. It calculates the proportion of residences with electric heating and air conditioning and their impact.
without Air Conditioning 82% x 82% = 67.2% 0.0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -9.8% For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the Low Income program and First Nation pilot projects, interactive effects of -1...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the Low Income program and First Nation pilot projects. It estimates -100% interactive effects during heating periods in electrically heated homes and +100% during cooling periods in homes with air conditioning, based on climate data from Halifax.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The table below presents the details for such a calculation. As for lighting products, the table shows the proportion of residences in Nova Scotia that are heated electrically and t...
AI summary The document presents an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on the interactive effects factor for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps. It calculates a weighted interactive effects factor of -9.0% based on the proportion of residences with electric heating and air conditioning.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, detailing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an analysis of their programs and initiatives related to energy efficiency.
Dehumidifier New Fridge Freezer Fridge Freezer Low-Flow Hot Water Faucet Pipe Product Category Repla- Dehumi- Repla- Repla- Retire- Retire- Aerators Shower- Insulation Tank cements difiers cements cements ments ments heads Wraps Energy Sav...
AI summary The text provides a table detailing energy savings for various products, including dehumidifiers, fridges, freezers, low-flow faucets, aerators, shower heads, and insulation. It includes metrics such as total gross energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, line loss factor, and total net energy savings at the meter.
105 1.105 1.105 1.105 Total Net Energy Savings 0.014 0 0.108 0.111 0.016 0.006 0.544 0.529 0.129 0.504 (GWh) – at the Generator Demand Savings Total Gross Demand Savings 0.003 0 0.021 0.021 0.003 0.001 0.105 0.102 0.027 0.107 – at the Mete...
AI summary The document presents energy savings data from the Low Income Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, comparing net energy savings with estimates from the 2011 tracking sheet.
et energy savings resulting from this evaluation were compared to the energy savings estimations from the 2011 tracking sheet. The next table details the final evaluated and tracked impacts for 2011. Table 31: Comparison of Tracked and Eva...
AI summary The evaluated net energy and demand savings were higher than those calculated by ENSC. The difference is attributed to the revision or addition of certain parameters in the evaluation process.
is that only a limited number of participants (319) had their houses improved through the EcoENERGY program when compared to the total program population (more than 5,000 participants). > Interactive effects factors: Interactive effects we...
AI summary The evaluation of the Low Income Program in 2011 by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Econoler found that interactive effects factors significantly reduced net energy and demand savings. The line loss factor was updated from 1.1188 to 1.105. Adjustments to unitary savings values increased gross savings by approximately 15%, but net savings were only 8% higher due to the use of interactive effects factors.
ergy and demand savings evaluated by Econoler were only 8 percent higher than those tracked by ENSC since the Evaluator used interactive effects factors for the calculation of the net program impacts. Upon completion of the impact evaluati...
AI summary Econoler evaluated energy and demand savings and found that their results were only 8% higher than those tracked by ENSC. They recommend assessing the installation rate of prescriptive measures and reviewing HOT2000 models to improve future impact calculations.
nergy advisor. In addition, the PM should target projects with outlier values, such as an initial EnerGuide rating below 20 or an increase of the EnerGuide rating by more than 40 points. > Ensure the final audits are completed after the im...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report highlights issues with the completion of final audits in the Low Income Program, noting that delays occurred due to an increase in participants. Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) used projected EnerGuide ratings and a 75% realization rate as temporary estimates. The report recommends ensuring that Delivery Agents (DAs) have sufficient staff and protocols to complete final audits promptly after measures are implemented.
Program 1. Revise the current process flow chart found in the program manual: The Manual program process flow chart illustrated in the program manual contains names of Content individuals in some places. The Evaluator recommends changing t...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends revising the program manual to clarify process flow chart terminology, document EnerGuide audits and trainer activities, monitor outreach activities with performance indicators, provide a 'base case' for gross savings calculations, and document parameters used for program objectives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011. It likely provides an overview of the organization's activities, performance, and achievements related to energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia.
Program 6. Complete the program manual to keep track of changes and standardize Manual the content: The program manual is well written but important information is Content missing to serve as “program memory” in case of modifications or st...
AI summary The document outlines several recommendations for improving the program manual and tracking sheet, including standardizing content, adding complementary information, standardizing entries, and implementing a verification protocol to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an overview of the organization's performance and outcomes during that period.
Program 12. Address the confusion around the program name: The program has carried Design and a few names through its existence (Low Income program and Low Income Implementation Homeowners). It was also integrated with the REAP program. Ac...
AI summary The document discusses the confusion caused by multiple names used for a low-income energy efficiency program and recommends clarifying the program's name. It also highlights the need for energy advisors to thoroughly explain the program's process, incentives, and energy concepts to participants to improve understanding and engagement.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs.
On-Sites Visits 15. Encourage the energy advisor to provide participants with booklets: Under its ecoENERGY program, NRCan developed a series of booklets for homeowners aiming to explain energy efficiency concepts and potential measures fo...
AI summary The text discusses improving program communications and participant engagement by providing informational materials and reducing the number of organizations involved in the program to streamline processes and reduce confusion.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely discussing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives and programs implemented during that period.
Impact 18. .Review HOT2000 models on a random basis: The Evaluator or the PM Evaluation should review a small percentage of the HOT2000 models on a random basis to validate the input data. The energy advisors would have to keep detailed re...
AI summary The text discusses the need to randomly review HOT2000 models and ensure final audits are completed after project implementation. It highlights the challenges in completing final audits due to increased participation and the use of temporary estimates for savings calculations.
le window for electricity savings measures as well as other energy-saving measures. The first is funded by ratepayers and the second by taxpayers. 8 Implementing the EE measure will Each measure has its own deemed savings along with reduce...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency (EE) measures and their funding sources, the impact of increasing participant numbers on program confidence, the role of specialized contractors in market transformation, and the evaluation of a low-income energy efficiency program.
Low Income Households Program Theory and Performance Indicators The following table explains the relationship between the different levels of the logic model. # Program Theory Performance Indicators 11 Sustainable energy savings will occur...
AI summary The document discusses the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on program theory and performance indicators related to sustainable energy savings and emission reductions. It also includes demographic data about participants, such as housing types and household sizes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Income 2009 2010 2011 Sample size 55 62 70 Less than $15,000 47% 40% 27% $15,000 - $24,999 31 31 44 $25,000 - $34,999 7 5 13 $35,000 - $49,999 2 2 1 $50,000 or more 2 Refused 11 23...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation provides data on income levels and household characteristics of respondents. The majority of respondents earn less than $15,000 annually and live in the same house involved in the program, with all respondents paying their own electric bills.
e Household Program 4. And now, Low Income Homeowner Care to comment? Q: We understand that the qualifying measures have changed from last year, correct? Source Program Manual Page 3 C: It is not easy to read who does what in the introduct...
AI summary The text discusses feedback on the Low Income Homeowner Program, including suggestions for improving clarity in the program manual, concerns about budget management, and questions about protocols for replacing and disposing of CFLs. It also references an evaluation report and mentions the need for performance indicators and process evaluations.
formation? Is this for saturation purposes? Q: Do you have a protocol for disposal of CFLs? Page 16 C: All the protocols that have been added to the program manual are considered as good practice. Q: Refrigerators and Freezers: These two i...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions and comments related to program protocols, audit procedures, and program evaluation, including topics such as CFL disposal, appliance eligibility, audit naming conventions, and the shutdown of Conserve Nova Scotia in 2011. There are also references to program manuals, participation forms, and evaluation reports.
his form within the next 48 hours, save the file and send it back at the following email address: [email protected]. Thank you! Part I: General Questions Please indicate your company name: Q1 - How would you define your role(s) as an E...
AI summary This document contains general questions directed to ENSC energy efficiency program partners, focusing on their role, experience with the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, and their relationship with the Program Administrator. It also asks about complaints received from program participants.
GUIDE WITH OUTREACH AGENT PROCESS EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ENSC ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM PARTNERS Program Name: Low-Income Households How to fill this form: This is a word document that integrates some form features. All you have to d...
AI summary This document is a process evaluation questionnaire for ENSC energy efficiency program partners, specifically focusing on the Low-Income Households program. It asks partners to provide information about their role, the duration of their involvement, and their perception of the transition from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report P3. What was the SINGLE most important reason you chose to participate in the program? [ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE] [DO NOT READ] 1. (To save on energy costs/bills) 2. (To receive a new re...
AI summary The document presents a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, asking participants about their reasons for joining an energy efficiency program, whether they had concerns about participation, and what those concerns were. The survey includes multiple-choice and open-ended response options.
/99 P15.a. Energy conservation measures installed 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 b. Quality of the work completed 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 P16. Has the information you received from the energy evaluation changed your behavior in terms of how you use energy at hom...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to energy conservation measures installed, behavior changes post-energy evaluation, and whether participants removed any energy efficiency measures from their homes. It focuses on the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and includes skip instructions for the evaluation report.
99. (Refused) [SKIP TO SECTION SM] [IF YES TO VA2] VA3. Which measures did you choose to remove from your home? [READ, RECORD ALL THAT APPLY] LIST OF MEASURES ON RECORD 1. Air sealing or weather stripping 2. Programmable thermostats 3. Tan...
AI summary This section of the document asks participants in a program to indicate which energy efficiency measures they removed from their homes, listing various options such as air sealing, programmable thermostats, and CFL light bulbs. It also includes a reference to an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report VA4. FOR EACH MEASURE RESPONDENT CHOSE TO REMOVE (VA3): Why did you choose to remove the [READ EACH ‘YES’ RESPONSE FROM VA3]? [DO NOT READ] 1. (Did not work like I thought it would)...
AI summary The document includes survey questions about why respondents removed energy conservation measures and their satisfaction with changes in energy bills. It also asks about the impact of the measures. The focus is on customer feedback regarding program effectiveness and perceived outcomes.
you choose not to install or implement in your home? [READ – ACCEPT multiple responses] REMOVE FROM LIST MEASURES THAT WERE INSTALLED THROUGH THE PROGRAM (CORRESPOND TO “1” IN THE DATABASE) 1. Building envelope measures such as: insulation...
AI summary This document lists measures installed through a program and provides options for removing them from a list. It also references an evaluation report for the Low Income Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, detailing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives and programs in the region.
19 Table 15: Results of the EnerGuide Baseline Studies .......................................................................... 22 Table 16: Annual Energy Savings of the Prescriptive Measures ................................................
AI summary This report evaluates the Performance Plus program in 2011, based on interviews with the Program Manager and builders, on-site visits, and a survey of 70 participants, providing insights into the program's process and impact.
he Performance Plus program. The 2011 evaluation was based on in-depth interviews with the Program Manager (PM) and 10 builders, two on-site visits, and a telephone survey of 70 program participants. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Performance Plus p...
AI summary The Performance Plus program provides financial incentives to homeowners and builders to encourage energy efficiency in new residential constructions beyond building code requirements. It involves simulation tools, reports with recommendations, and a final inspection to assess efficiency and provide an EnerGuide rating.
and a blower door test are completed once the home is built to assess the home’s level of efficiency and to provide a final EnerGuide rating. The following measures were promoted through the program: > ENERGY STAR®-qualified ductless (“min...
AI summary The Performance Plus program, run by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, achieved significant energy savings in 2011, with 701 participants and 2.45 GWh of net electricity savings. The program promotes energy-efficient measures such as heat pumps, water heating systems, and lighting.
net energy savings, the program generated 2.45 GWh in 2011, which represents an increase of approximately 360 percent in comparison to 2010 net savings (0.68 GWh). Homeowner and Builder Involvement Most homeowner participants personally to...
AI summary The Performance Plus program achieved significant net energy savings, increasing by 360% from 2010 to 2011. Homeowners and builders were both actively involved in the program, with homeowners showing high satisfaction levels and builders expressing strong support. Suggestions for improvement included more information on energy measures and increased advertising.
ore (93%). Suggestions for improving the program from homeowner participants included offering more information on the measures recommended and increasing program advertising. Program Energy Savings To calculate the net savings of the Perf...
AI summary The Performance Plus program's energy savings in 2011 were evaluated by Econoler, who adjusted the baseline EnerGuide rating and the savings per EnerGuide point based on simulation analyses and national DSM studies. Suggestions from homeowners included improving information and increasing program advertising.
tio 0.73 The evaluation revealed that the Performance Plus program had generated net energy savings of 2.454 GWh and demand savings of 0.861 MW in 2011, as shown in the next table. Ref.: 5725 vii Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Sc...
AI summary The evaluation of the Performance Plus program in 2011 showed that it generated net energy savings of 2.454 GWh and demand savings of 0.861 MW. The results are based on gross savings adjusted for interactive effects.
acked Savings from ENSC 1.560 MW 1.560 MW 0.46 0.717 MW Evaluation Results 1.324 MW 1.180 MW 0.73 0.861 MW As per the last table, the evaluated net energy savings exceeded those tracked by ENSC by more than 80 percent. This is mainly due t...
AI summary The evaluated net energy savings exceeded those tracked by ENSC by more than 80 percent, largely due to an adjustment in the house rating baseline value and a higher net-to-gross ratio. Econoler recommends optimizing specific aspects of the program, finding that it works well overall.
for all ENSC programs in the overall executive summary of the 2011 DSM programs, the Evaluator has the following specific recommendations that are aimed at optimizing specific aspects of the program: PP-R1. Increase the number of in-depth...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends increasing the number of in-depth interviews with home builders to better assess the impact of ENSC programs on market effects, as the current sample size was too small to draw definitive conclusions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report PP-R2. Improve program communication: The main recommendations expressed by homeowner participants were related to communication improvements. More specifically, the surveyed partic...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation highlights the need for improved program communication and the inclusion of HOT2000 simulation data in tracking sheets to more accurately calculate energy savings. Homeowner participants emphasized the need for more information and advertising, and the Evaluator recommends using simulated energy consumption data for precise savings calculations.
cotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation’s (ENSC) Performance Plus program is aimed at encouraging homeowners and builders across Nova Scotia (NS) to exceed t...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Performance Plus program encourages homeowners and builders to exceed required building code energy efficiency standards in new homes. The program is funded by electricity ratepayers and the Province of Nova Scotia, with funds used to reduce electricity consumption and support all homes regardless of heating type.
received from electricity ratepayers go towards measures that reduce electricity consumption, whereas funds from the Province of Nova Scotia are directed to all homes regardless of their heating type. Three delivery agents (DAs), approved...
AI summary Funds from electricity ratepayers support energy efficiency measures, while provincial funds benefit all homes regardless of heating type. Nova Scotia’s Performance Plus program, managed by three delivery agents approved by Natural Resources Canada, requires registration, simulation using HOT2000, and achieving an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher for rebate eligibility.
tion after registration in the program. A final inspection and a blower door test are completed once the home is built to assess the home’s level of efficiency and to provide a final EnerGuide rating. Based on the EnerGuide rating provided...
AI summary The Performance Plus Program provides incentives based on EnerGuide ratings after a final inspection and blower door test. Rebates can be paid to the homeowner or builder, with the homeowner needing to confirm consent for direct payment to the builder. HOT2000 software is used for EnerGuide ratings and was developed by CanmetENERGY.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Several types of incentives are provided through the program. As mentioned above, the builder or the homeowner needs to send a payment of $250 to have the initial evaluation of the...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation program offers various incentives for energy-efficient home improvements, including initial evaluations and rebates based on EnerGuide ratings. In 2011, the program had 701 participants and aimed for 2.60 GWh of electricity savings and 0.79 MW of demand savings.
he program aimed to achieve net electricity savings of 2.60 GWh and demand savings of 0.79 MW. For reference purposes, the Performance Plus program generated net energy savings of 0.68 GWh in 2010. Ref.: 5725 2 Performance Plus Program Eff...
AI summary The Performance Plus program aimed to achieve electricity savings of 2.60 GWh and demand savings of 0.79 MW. A 2011 evaluation report outlines the program's logic model and methodology, including the analysis of program documentation and the use of research tools like interviews and surveys.
ly monitor program savings. The necessary fields for program administration and evaluation purposes are present, but some improvements could make this tool a better asset for the PM and the Evaluator. The tracking sheet is presented in one...
AI summary The document discusses the tracking sheet used for the Performance Plus program, noting that while it contains necessary fields for program administration and evaluation, improvements are needed. The sheet includes data from HOT2000 simulations and program evaluations, but the Evaluator did not review the online DSMDS system, which ENSC is working to improve.
the Demand Side Management Data System (DSMDS). At the time of writing this report, ENSC was working on the DSMDS to make it more accessible and ensure that the information contained was up to date. Ref.: 5725 8 Performance Plus Program Ef...
AI summary The report discusses the Demand Side Management Data System (DSMDS) and its development by ENSC. It also addresses the Performance Plus Program evaluation, highlighting the need for improvements in the tracking sheet for consistency and efficiency in program evaluation.
systematically entered for these fields. Conversely, the fields that are not utilized should be removed from the tracking sheet in order to concentrate the efforts on the essential. > Delete fields for individual measures savings for which...
AI summary The text discusses improvements to a tracking sheet for the Performance Plus program, including removing unnecessary fields, differentiating applicants, and adding fields for energy consumption data. The focus is on streamlining the sheet for better accuracy and clarity in energy savings calculations.
y consumption data from HOT2000. Econoler recommends adding fields for building energy consumption per year in kWh for both a baseline house built to code and the house as completed. > Ensure that all fields are systematically filled in: O...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations for improving data collection in energy efficiency programs, including the use of the HOT2000 simulation software and the need for systematic data entry. It also mentions on-site visits conducted as part of the Performance Plus Program evaluation to ensure proper implementation of energy efficiency measures.
on house design (if available). Each parameter used in the HOT2000 models must be validated and documented appropriately. Furthermore, the audit procedures should be clearly explained to participants. During the two visits, the Evaluator n...
AI summary The Evaluator noted that advisors followed EcoEnergy protocol procedures well during house audits, but identified issues with blower door tests, such as leaving the fan hole open and not taking temperatures on-site at the time of testing. These practices may lead to biased results, though overall tests were performed properly.
ng the test. As defined by the protocol, sinks, floor drains and siphons were also properly filled with water. Taking into account the findings of the two on-site visits, the Evaluator recommends to: > Explain in detail the protocol to the...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends improving client education about the protocol, documenting house parameters with photographs for accurate HOT2000 models, and enforcing proper procedures for blower door tests to ensure accurate EnerGuide ratings.
tial test and failed to take the temperature on site during the visit. These practices may influence significantly the HOT2000 simulation and thereby the calculated EnerGuide rating. > Encourage the energy advisor to provide participants w...
AI summary The text discusses issues with the HOT2000 simulation tool and the impact of energy advisors not taking on-site temperatures, which can affect EnerGuide ratings. It also mentions the use of informational booklets under the ecoENERGY program to improve participant understanding of energy efficiency measures.
Source of Awareness 2009 (#) 2010 (%) 2011 (%) Sample Size 10 43 70 From a contractor 2% 29% Builder 2 28 17 Internet (unspecified) 7 17 Word of mouth (neighbour, friend, co-worker, family 3 9 11 member, etc.) Radio advertisement 5 7 Real...
AI summary The text presents data on sources of awareness for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2009 to 2011. It shows the percentage of respondents who became aware of the programs through various channels, such as word of mouth, internet, and media.
nspecified source) 1 Nova Scotia government website 1 Conserve Nova Scotia website 1 Previous experience building with EnerGuide 1 1 Other (unspecified) 16 Don’t know/refused 1 5 1 Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 12 Performance Plus Program...
AI summary The Performance Plus Program evaluation report indicates that 76% of respondents personally participated in the decision to join the program, and 74% were involved in choosing energy efficiency measures. This highlights strong homeowner involvement, though builders also play a significant role in decision making.
s show a high level of involvement on the part of homeowners, although a non- negligible proportion of builders are involved in decision making showing the importance of builders as program partners. Table 5: Homeowner Involvement in Decis...
AI summary The text highlights that homeowners are highly involved in decision-making processes related to energy efficiency programs, with a significant portion of builders also participating. Most participants were involved in the initial planning and design stages, showing increased engagement compared to previous findings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.4.3 Participation Motivations and Barriers Having a house that would save on energy costs is one of the main motivations for participating in the program, with over two in 10 resp...
AI summary The report highlights that the primary motivation for participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's program is the potential for energy cost savings, with 23% of respondents citing this reason. Rebates were also a significant factor, with 19% mentioning general rebates and 17% mentioning rebates for already implemented measures. The report recommends that marketing efforts should continue to focus on these key incentives.
Table 7: Reasons for Participating 2010 2011 Most Important Motivation Most Second Most Most Second Most Important Important Important Important Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Sample Size 21 21 53 52 To have a house that would...
AI summary The table presents the reasons for participating in energy efficiency programs in 2010 and 2011, with the most important motivation being saving on energy costs and bills, followed by receiving rebates and improving home energy efficiency.
pondents, one was not sure about the eligibility of his modular home, one was not familiar with the type of measures implemented and one thought the process would take too long or be too complicated. Table 8: Concerns with Program Prior to...
AI summary Respondents expressed concerns about program eligibility, understanding of measures, and process complexity. Program incentives were the most influential factor in decisions to build energy-efficient homes, followed by information provided, EnerGuide Label, and feedback from home plan reviews.
lso important (7.3), followed by the EnerGuide Label and designation (6.8) and the feedback received from the review of home plans (6.5). Previous experience was less important to participants (3.7). Table 9: Importance of Program in Influ...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of various factors in influencing decisions to build or buy a house with high energy efficiency, with program incentives and information being the most significant factors. The EnerGuide label and feedback from home plan reviews also play notable roles.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.4.5 Impact of Measures Nearly all respondents (96%) reported that the energy efficiency measures resulted in a more comfortable home while eight in 10 (80%) noted that these measu...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report indicates that 96% of respondents found energy efficiency measures increased home comfort, and 80% noted significantly lower energy bills, showing improvement from 2010 findings.
7 4 Don’t know / refused 3 28 16 3.4.6 Satisfaction with Program There is a high level of satisfaction with the program, with nearly all respondents rating their overall experience as very satisfied or satisfied (91%). Respondents were hig...
AI summary The Performance Plus Program has a high level of satisfaction, with 91% of respondents reporting very satisfied or satisfied. Satisfaction was particularly high with the final energy audit, house plan reviews, and scheduling. Lower satisfaction was noted with rebates and energy efficiency recommendations, though still positive. A few respondents expressed dissatisfaction with rebate amounts and the duration of the final audit.
o were dissatisfied with their final energy audit (three respondents), one felt that the final energy audit took too long. Table 11: Satisfaction with Aspects of Program Satisfaction with Program 2009 (#) 2010 (%) 2011 (%) Sample Size 10 4...
AI summary Participants expressed general satisfaction with the program, though some were dissatisfied with the final energy audit's duration. Builders were highly satisfied with the program, noting its benefits to the construction industry and energy efficiency behaviors of homeowners.
ut also that it had had a positive influence on homeowners and on their energy efficiency behaviors. The participating builders were delighted to be part of the program and wished for it to continue. 3.4.7 Participant Recommendations for I...
AI summary The majority of participants in the Performance Plus Program did not offer recommendations for improvement, but those who did suggested better communication and faster delivery of review results. Participants emphasized the need for more information on rebates and better advertising of the program.
Table 12: Suggested Improvements to the Program Suggestions 2009 (#) 2010 (%) 2011 (%) Sample size 10 43 70 More marketing/advertising 1% 7% 7% Offer more information on the measures recommended 7 Make process simpler (consolidate rebate 3...
AI summary Table 12 outlines suggested improvements to a program over the years 2009 to 2011, highlighting areas such as increasing marketing, simplifying processes, offering more eligible measures, improving auditor quality, and enhancing communication with builders and customers.
2 Continue program 2 Other 8 No recommendation 67 Don’t know 4 Ref.: 5725 18 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Two in 10 respondents (19%) indicated that some energy efficiency measures that...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Performance Plus Program found that 19% of respondents believed some energy efficiency measures were not covered by the program, such as heat pumps, insulation, and renewable energy sources. However, most of these measures were actually covered, indicating a need for improved program communication.
ho mentioned heat pumps were referring to the eligibility of some models. For example, one respondent said that he would have chosen a different heat pump than the one in compliance with the program. Table 13: Additional Energy Efficiency...
AI summary The text discusses feedback on heat pump eligibility and the effectiveness of a participation flow chart for the Performance Plus program. Respondents indicated that a diagram would have improved program participation, with 61% believing it would significantly or somewhat facilitate participation.
ulate the net-to-gross ratio for this program, including free-ridership, internal spillover and market effects. The NTGR established was used to calculate program net savings. 4.2 GROSS SAVINGS As mentioned previously, the 2011 evaluation...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of net-to-gross ratio for the Performance Plus program, including free-ridership, internal spillover, and market effects. Gross savings are calculated using parameters such as incremental energy savings per EnerGuide point and energy-to-demand ratio for demand savings.
residential construction standards affected the minimum energy efficiency of new houses in Nova Scotia. For additional information: http://www.gov.ns.ca/lwd/buildingcode/docs/NSBuildingCodeAct.pdf. Ref.: 5725 21 Performance Plus Program Ef...
AI summary The text discusses residential construction standards in Nova Scotia and references an evaluation report on the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
code, which was put into force in January 2010. 8 ACH50: air changes per hour at a pressure difference of 50 Pascals. This is the standard SI unit for reporting the blower- door test results. Ref.: 5725 22 Performance Plus Program Efficien...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights a shortcoming in the Sustainable Housing study due to a low sample size and notes that ENSC used a higher baseline EnerGuide rating of 78. ENSC calculates energy savings based on EnerGuide points, using a coefficient of 1,032 kWh per point, but only for homes with electricity as the main heat source.
sly calculated EnerGuide savings per point (1,089 kWh). Econoler decided to use the first energy savings coefficient (i.e., 1,089 kWh per EnerGuide point) as a basis for energy savings computation. Ref.: 5725 23 Performance Plus Program Ef...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the accuracy of HOT2000 simulations used in the Performance Plus Program and found that they overestimated electricity consumption by about 25%. This led to an adjustment in the calculated energy savings per EnerGuide point, reducing it from 1,089 kWh to 817 kWh.
er heat recovery with an efficiency of 42 percent or greater; > electric hot water heater pipe insulation; > programmable thermostats; and > energy-efficient lighting products. In the above list, additional savings were taken into consider...
AI summary The text outlines prescriptive energy efficiency measures, including heat recovery, electric hot water heater insulation, programmable thermostats, and energy-efficient lighting. Energy savings calculations vary based on the primary energy source of the heating system and are defined in Table 16. Additional measures like electric hot water heater tank wraps and solar domestic hot water heaters are considered under specific conditions.
60 watt incandescent lamps. This is by far the most common energy efficiency measure in residential lighting. The savings for this prescriptive measure were calculated in the EEH evaluation report. Ref.: 5725 25 Performance Plus Program Ef...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency measures, specifically highlighting the 60 watt incandescent lamps as a common residential lighting measure. It also references a report evaluating the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and mentions a table comparing savings values from ENSC and Econoler.
ghts the seven prescriptive measures for which Econoler took into account additional savings per measure. The savings values of ENSC along with those of Econoler are also included in the table below. Table 16: Annual Energy Savings of the...
AI summary The text discusses the annual energy savings of various prescriptive measures, comparing the savings values calculated by ENSC and Econoler. It mentions the evaluation process conducted by Econoler as part of the EEH program and refers to a detailed evaluation report.
l of the above annual savings values as part of the EEH program evaluation process. The corresponding evaluation report presents all details of this analysis. 4.2.2 Demand Savings Calculation The demand savings of the Performance Plus prog...
AI summary The Performance Plus program's demand savings are calculated using an energy-to-demand ratio of 3.77 GWh/MW, confirmed by ENSC, and additional savings from ETS units installed in residential buildings. ETS systems reduce demand by storing heat during off-peak hours and releasing it during on-peak hours. Different ETS systems provide varying levels of demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report In the 2011 EEH program evaluation report, Econoler assessed the validity of these two demand savings values (10 kW and 45 kW). Upon completion of this evaluation, Econoler calculat...
AI summary The 2011 EEH program evaluation report by Econoler assessed demand savings values for ETS systems and revised gross savings calculations using a line loss factor provided by Nova Scotia Power. The report outlines energy and demand savings based on EnerGuide ratings and prescriptive measures.
Savings DWHR Program- ETS ETS DWHR ETS per (eff. = Pipe Tank mable Solar 13 Watt Forced Central Product Category (eff. ≥ Room EnerGuide 30% to Insulation Wraps Thermo- DHW CFLs Air Hydronic 42%) Units Point 42%) stats Furnaces Systems Ener...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data for various products and programs, including the number of units, unitary savings in kWh, and total gross energy savings at the meter in GWh. It also includes a line loss factor applied to calculate total gross energy savings.
rgy savings for hot water tank wraps and solar domestic hot water heating (solar DHW) were calculated only when there was no electrical space heating and when the water heating system was electric. Ref.: 5725 28 Performance Plus Program Ef...
AI summary The 2011 Performance Plus Program achieved estimated energy savings of 3.20 GWh at the meter and 3.53 GWh at the generator, with peak demand savings of 1.14 MW and 1.26 MW respectively. Econoler recommends using detailed building energy data and HOT2000 simulations to improve future impact calculations.
s information can be collected from HOT2000 simulation results. The delivery agents should be able to verify this information on site during their audit with program participants. Ref.: 5725 29 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary The Performance Plus Program involves installing energy-efficient lighting (CFLs) which affects heating and cooling loads in homes. CFLs reduce heat output, increasing winter heating demand and decreasing summer cooling demand.
ard incandescent bulbs causes an increase in the heating load during winter and a decrease in the cooling load during summer. Indeed, CFLs release less heat than the less efficient lamps they replace. For CFLs installed in 2011, an interac...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of replacing incandescent bulbs with CFLs on heating and cooling loads, noting that CFLs reduce heat output. It mentions the use of an interactive effects factor of -29.1 percent for 2011, based on a 1992 study by ADS for Hydro-Québec, which simulated residential heating scenarios using DOE-214 software.
f houses that had air conditioning units or systems installed. This percentage was taken from Statistics Canada,16 which states that 18 percent of households have air conditioning in their residence. 13 ADS ASSOCIÉS, “Évaluations des effet...
AI summary The text discusses the percentage of households in Nova Scotia with air conditioning and references data from Statistics Canada. It also mentions a table presenting interactive effects factors for compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in the context of the Performance Plus Program evaluation report.
esidences in Nova Scotia that are mainly heated by electricity and those that have air conditioning units or systems. Table 18: Interactive Effects Factor for CFLs Parameters % of Residences Interactive Effects Electric Baseboard Heating w...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects factor for compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in different residential heating and air conditioning scenarios, as well as the interactive effects of pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps in electrically heated homes and those with air conditioning. The weighted interactive effects factor for CFLs is calculated as -29.1%.
ed on the heating and cooling degree-days for the region of Halifax,17 Econoler considered an eight-month period of heating and a two-month period of cooling in the interactive effects calculation. 17 RETScreen International, Normalized cl...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects for water pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, using heating and cooling degree-days for Halifax. It includes a weighted interactive effects factor of -31.3 percent, derived from data on residential heating and cooling methods in Nova Scotia.
red for this program through a participant survey conducted with homeowners as well as through interviews with participating builders. The questionnaire included six questions that intended to assess: > if homeowners had any plans to build...
AI summary The program's impact on homeowners and builders was evaluated through surveys and interviews, assessing factors such as the influence of the program on decisions to build or buy energy-efficient homes, the likelihood of achieving specific EnerGuide ratings, and the timing and cost of implementing energy efficiency measures.
plemented (or are currently implementing) additional energy-efficient products (CFLs) in their house, following their previous participation in the program. These additional energy-efficient products Ref.: 5725 34 Performance Plus Program...
AI summary The Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation is evaluated for its energy savings and market effects. The program's energy savings are reported as 7.8 MWh, or 0.2% of total gross savings, with no spillover effects considered. Market effects may occur when builders implement energy efficiency measures independently of the program.
on various energy efficiency measures. Consequently, market effects can occur when a builder decides to implement energy efficiency measures in new constructions without participating in the program. Ten in-depth builder interviews were co...
AI summary The document discusses a study on market effects of energy efficiency programs, based on interviews with builders. It found that 5% of market effects were attributed to the program, with participating builders showing lower effects (1.7%) compared to non-participating ones (8%).
2011 Evaluation Report Table 20: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report presents the results of an evaluation focusing on net energy and demand savings, as detailed in Table 20. The table likely contains key metrics and findings related to energy efficiency and demand management initiatives.
Savings DWHR Program- ETS ETS DWHR Tank ETS per (eff. = Pipe mable Solar 13 Watt Forced Central Product Category EnerGuide 30% to (eff. ≥ Insulation Wraps Thermo- DHW CFLs Air Hydronic Room 42%) Units Point 42%) stats Furnaces Systems Ener...
AI summary The text presents a table with energy savings data for various products and technologies, including Energy Savings, Interactive Effects Factor, NTGR, and Total Net Energy Savings. The table includes metrics such as Gross Energy Savings and Line Loss Factor for different categories like DWHR, ETS, and others.
7 0.001 0.026 0.002 0 0.036 0 0.122 N/A N/A N/A (GWh) – at Meter Line Loss Factor 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 1.105 N/A N/A N/A Total Net Energy Savings 2.505 0.001 0.029 0.002 0 0.040 0 0.134 N/A N/A N/A (GWh) – at Generator...
AI summary The document presents data on energy savings and demand reductions related to the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including line loss factors and net-to-gross ratios, and references an evaluation report from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The Evaluator compared the net energy savings values calculated in the previous table with the Performance Plus program tracked net savings for 2011. The next table details the fina...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Performance Plus program. Tracked energy savings were 2.948 GWh, while evaluated savings were 3.791 GWh. Tracked demand savings were 1.560 MW, compared to evaluated demand savings of 1.324 MW. The report highlights differences in gross and net savings with interactive effects and NTGR considerations.
acked Savings from ENSC 1.560 MW 1.560 MW 0.46 0.717 MW Evaluation Results 1.324 MW 1.180 MW 0.73 0.861 MW As per the last table, the evaluated net energy savings exceeded those tracked by ENSC by more than 80 percent. This is mainly due t...
AI summary The evaluation of the Performance Plus Program by ENSC shows that net energy savings exceeded initial tracking by over 80%, primarily due to adjustments in the house rating baseline and the inclusion of energy and demand savings from efficient lighting. The Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) increased from 0.46 to 0.73, reflecting changes in free-rider evaluation approaches. Demand savings realization was lower at 120% due to adjustments in peak demand savings calculations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX I - RECOMMENDATIONS This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. Sec...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, with Appendix I listing all recommendations made by the evaluator along with the sections where they originated.
Program 1. Determine the required fields and remove those that are unnecessary: The Tracking PM, together with the Evaluator, should determine what fields are necessary for Sheet administration and evaluation purposes and ensure that the i...
AI summary The document outlines steps to improve the tracking sheet for the Performance Plus program, including removing unnecessary fields, deleting fields related to energy savings already included in EnerGuide ratings, and differentiating applicants such as building owners, occupants, or builders.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing insights into the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives during that period.
On-Site Visits 6. Explain in detail the protocol to the clients: The energy advisor should explain carefully the different elements of the protocol to the clients (program process, incentives, booklets, resulting report, concepts under the...
AI summary The text outlines detailed protocols for on-site visits by energy advisors, emphasizing the need to explain procedures, document house parameters, enforce blower door test protocols, and provide educational materials to participants. It highlights the importance of accurate data collection and proper testing to ensure reliable EnerGuide ratings and HOT2000 simulations.
cy concepts and potential measures for reducing energy consumption (such as the free guide “Keeping the Heat In”). Since residential participants often have a low understanding of the proposed energy efficiency measures, such informational...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of improving communication in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the need for better information on recommended measures and increasing program advertising. It highlights that participants often have a low understanding of energy efficiency measures and that program marketing should focus on energy bill savings and rebates as key motivators for participation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, which likely discusses the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken during that period.
tracking sheet should include a percentage (ranging from 0 to 100%) to take into account houses that are not fully heated with electricity year-round. In the EEH program savings calculations, this percentage is collected for each participa...
AI summary The tracking sheet should include a percentage to adjust savings calculations for homes not fully heated with electricity. The Evaluator suggests increasing the number of interviews with home builders to better assess market effects of energy efficiency programs.
98% 99% Seasonal/vacation home 1 Don’t know/refused 2 Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Participants have a mix of ages, with nearly six in 10 between the age of 25 and 44 (57%)....
AI summary The Performance Plus Program evaluation report highlights participant demographics, showing that nearly 60% of participants are aged 25-44 and two-thirds have a college or university degree. The report includes data from surveys conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Page 13 C: The program logic model: In our opinion, the ‘’Energy Savings and Bill Reduction’’ bubble’’ should be moved to the Short Term Outcome section. Care to comment? Q: Also th...
AI summary The document contains questions and comments regarding the Energy Savings and Bill Reduction program logic model, eligibility criteria for homes with electric baseboards, and discrepancies between incentives listed on the website and in the program manual. It also references the renaming of the program to Performance Plus and concerns about double incentives for achieving high EnerGuide scores.
e Guide Q: On the Web site we see only incentives to electricity measures. In the program manual we have both incentives coming from rate-payer funds and coming from provincial funds, Why is that? Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Effici...
AI summary The document contains questions and clarifications regarding the Performance Plus Program, including the source of funding, program name changes, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders. Questions focus on incentives, program implementation, and data collection practices.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV - INTERVIEW GUIDES WITH BUILDERS PARTICIPATING BUILDER INTERVIEW GUIDE ENSC PERFORMANCE PLUS PROGRAM October 27, 2011 Hello, may I please speak with _? 1. Yes [GO TO INT...
AI summary This document is an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) for evaluating the Performance Plus program. It outlines the process for contacting participating builders and gathering information about their involvement in the program during 2011.
u built so far in 2011 in Nova Scotia? (or try to get a percentage per type) [IF RESPONDENT FINDS IT DIFFICULT TO GIVE AN EXACT NUMBER, ASK FOR A PERCENTAGE OF ANSWER TO A1] Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary The text is part of an evaluation report for the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions about the number of residential units built under the program and the measures implemented. It also addresses free-ridership by asking whether the same number of energy-efficient homes would have been built without the program's rebate.
es built under the program, how many houses with an EnerGuide rating of 83 would you have built if you had not participated in the Performance Plus program? Enter number: Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporati...
AI summary The text asks participants in the Performance Plus program to estimate how many houses with an EnerGuide rating of 83 they would have built without the program, and whether they would have installed efficient HVAC, lighting, and windows/doors to achieve the same rating.
th the exact same level of efficiency in the houses that you built, reaching the same EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher? Scale: Don’t Know Refused Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report...
AI summary The text asks builders about their use of the Performance Plus program and its impact on achieving high EnerGuide ratings in homes. It includes questions on whether they would have installed the same level of insulation without the program and the importance of the program and other factors in their decision-making.
Scale Don’t Know Refused information c. Feedback received from the Scale Don’t Know Refused review of home plans d. The EnerGuide label and Scale Don’t Know Refused designation itself e. Previous experience with the Performance Plus progra...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Performance Plus program, focusing on market effects and participant behavior. It asks about energy-efficient home construction, implementation of program measures, rebate decisions, and the likelihood of building without the program. The report also seeks additional feedback from participants.
. Do you have anything to add regarding the program, your participation in the program or this interview? Thank you very much for your collaboration and the time you took to answer our questions. Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficie...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Performance Plus program, also known as the 'New Houses' program. It includes questions for non-participating builders to gather their knowledge and perceptions of the program.
CENTAGE OF ANSWER TO A1] A3. Has your firm ever participated in the Performance Plus program? Yes No Don't know Refused Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report A4. For what reason(s) ha...
AI summary The document includes questions about participation in the Performance Plus program and the implementation of energy-efficient measures in new residential units by a firm. It also asks about reasons for non-participation and the measures taken.
2011 Evaluation Report M2. What energy-efficient measures has your firm implemented in those new residential units? M3. What percentage of these measures would you not have implemented if the program had not been implemented (point out pro...
AI summary This document is a questionnaire from the 2011 Evaluation Report on the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions directed at participants regarding the implementation of energy-efficient measures in residential units and the influence of the Performance Plus program on building decisions.
ESTIONNAIRE Participant questionnaire Performance Plus Program October 14, 2011 Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] INTRODUCTION Hello, m...
AI summary This document is a participant questionnaire for the Performance Plus program, formerly known as 'EnerGuide for New Houses' or 'R2000', conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questionnaire aims to evaluate the program's performance based on participant feedback.
Recall V1. We understand you participated in the Performance Plus program for the house you built or are building at [ADDRESS FROM FILE]. Is that correct? 1. Yes [CONTINUE] 2. No [PROMPT: “Are you sure? This program provides rebates for in...
AI summary The text discusses the Performance Plus program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which provides rebates for energy-efficient upgrades in newly constructed homes. It includes prompts to confirm participation in the program and instructions for handling responses.
uld know about having participated in the Performance Plus program?”] 1. Yes [ASK TO SPEAK TO THEM AND REPEAT INTRODUCTION] 2. No [THANK & TERMINATE] 99. Refused [THANK AND TERMINATE] [IF REFUSED, ASK “Can we schedule a more convenient tim...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the Performance Plus program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions about participation in the program, decision-making roles, and involvement in energy efficiency measures for homes.
ng statements would you say best describes when you became involved in the decisions about the energy efficiency of your home? Would you say… READ STATEMENTS IN ORDER – CODE ONE ONLY 1. You were involved from the initial planning and desig...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about homeowner involvement in energy efficiency decisions during home planning and learning about the Performance Plus program. It asks respondents to indicate when they became involved and how they learned about the program.
s Canada Website) 8. (Nova Scotia Home Builders Association’s member list) 9. (The Internet) 10. (Radio Ad) 11. (Newspaper/Renovation Guide Ad or Story) Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation...
AI summary The text outlines various channels through which participants learned about the Performance Plus Program, including online resources, media, and word of mouth. It also asks participants to identify the most important reason they joined the program.
1 2 3 4 5 98/99 c. The report you received about the house plan’s current energy efficiency 1 2 3 4 5 98/99 Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report d. Recommendations for energy efficie...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report for the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It outlines the process for reviewing house plans, including energy efficiency measures, final audits, and rebate provisions. It also includes a survey question about dissatisfaction with the initial review of house plans.
4. (Not enough items covered by first review of the house plans) 5. (Didn’t like the recommendations) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _]) 98. (Don’t know) S6. Were there any other reasons you were dissatisfied with the energy efficiency review of the...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to dissatisfaction with energy efficiency reviews and final energy audits, as well as a question about homeowners' decisions to build or buy energy-efficient homes before participating in the Performance Plus program.
80. Did you decide to build or buy a house with a high level of energy efficiency, reaching an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher, before participating in the Performance Plus program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) [IF FR1=YES]...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation in the Performance Plus program, specifically whether respondents had already decided to build or buy a highly energy-efficient home before joining the program. It also asks about the likelihood of taking similar actions without the program. The document references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR2b. …built or bought a standard house, with an EnerGuide rating under 83, instead of a house with a high level of energy efficiency that has an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher? _...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Performance Plus program, asking respondents about their likelihood of building or buying a home with a specific EnerGuide rating at a later date if the program had not been available, and how long that delay would have been.
5. 3 to less than 4 years later? 6. 4 or more years later? 7. (Never) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) [ASK FR3_1 IF, IN SAMPLE, TotalRebates>0] Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR...
AI summary The document contains survey questions related to the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking participants about their willingness to pay for energy efficiency measures if rebates were not available. It includes response options and instructions for data collection.
y Would Have Paid.” PROBE FOR SPECIFIC RESPONSE – DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE _ Response 97. (Did not receive that rebate) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FR4. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the importance of the Performance Plus program as w...
AI summary The text refers to the Performance Plus program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and asks respondents to rate the importance of various factors in their decision to build or buy a house with an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher. The evaluation is part of a 2011 report.
am, or a similar program either from _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Efficiency Nova Scotia or Nova Scotia Power Section SO – Spillover – Homeowners SO1. Now I’d like you to think about the time since you participated in the Performa...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, asking participants about additional energy-efficient measures they implemented post-program and whether they benefited from other financing or rebates.
1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SO4c. Lighting equipment? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SO4d. Other energy-efficient measures? 1. Yes [Please specify _] 2. No 98. (Don’t know) [IF SO3 = 2] Ref.: 5725 Performance Plus Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The text includes survey questions from an evaluation report of the Performance Plus Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking participants about the influence of the program on their decision to implement energy-efficient measures and the impact of these measures on comfort and energy bills.
f you had not installed the energy efficiency measures, do you think the energy efficiency measures installed through the program have resulted in a significantly lower energy bills? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Section RU -...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the impact of energy efficiency measures on energy bills and homeowner receptivity to upgrades not covered by the Performance Plus Program. It also asks for recommendations to improve the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives and programs in the region.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, which likely discusses the organization's performance and initiatives related to energy efficiency programs in the region.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an overview of the organization's activities and performance during that period.
lent communication tool for the program. Word of mouth was also mentioned as an important source of awareness, which should be considered as a strong indicator of program satisfaction. Satisfaction Satisfaction towards the program is high...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program has high participant satisfaction, with many expressing contentment with the program's communication and effectiveness. Recommendations for improvement include better marketing and increased customer interaction. Program energy savings were calculated by Econoler, accounting for free-ridership and internal spillover effects, resulting in a 17.6% free-ridership rate and 0.2% spillover rate.
9.483 GWh 9.483 GWh 9.483 GWh 0.75 7.112 GWh from ENSC Evaluation Results 9.760 GWh 9.340 GWh 8.436 GWh 0.83 7.002 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings 1.977 MW 1.977 MW 1.977 MW 0.75 1.483 MW from ENSC Evaluation Results 1.963 MW 1.895 MW 1...
AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates Program by Econoler found that the program works well overall. Net evaluated savings were slightly lower than tracked savings due to adjustments from on-site visits and an interactive effects factor. The report includes recommendations for optimizing the program.
cate energy savings and cost reductions, which constitutes the most important motivation for participating in the BER program and for installing energy-efficient equipment. BER-R3. Increase program promotion: The fact that the ENSC website...
AI summary The BER program aims to promote energy savings and cost reductions through the installation of energy-efficient equipment. While the ENSC has made progress in program promotion, there is a need for more aggressive outreach strategies. Additionally, collecting more detailed information from participants is recommended to improve the accuracy of savings calculations for various energy measures.
, information on the heating source and the use of air conditioning should be collected during the surveys with C&I customers to better estimate the interactive effects. Ref.: 5725 viii Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary The document discusses the need to collect information on heating sources and air conditioning use during customer surveys to better estimate interactive effects. It also mentions the need to increase on-site visits for the Business Energy Rebates Program to ensure sufficient data collection for all equipment categories.
Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides financial incentives, in the form of prescriptive rebates, to commercial and industri...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in Nova Scotia provides financial incentives to commercial and industrial clients to reduce energy consumption and demand. Launched in 2010, the program aims to increase the use of energy-efficient products and technologies, with a goal of achieving 21.80 GWh in electricity savings by 2011.
e net electricity savings of 21.80 GWh in 2011. In 2010, the BER program generated net electricity savings of 0.503 GWh. Eligible Measures The prescribed measures are divided into seven categories: > Lighting Fixtures & Lamps; > Occupancy...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program generated 0.503 GWh of net electricity savings in 2010 and 21.80 GWh in 2011. The program allows eligible commercial customers to apply for rebates on energy-efficient products, which are categorized into seven types, including lighting, HVAC systems, and compressed air equipment.
ned primarily from the following four sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation report; > program manual; > tracking sheet. 2.2.2 In-Depth Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff conducted one interview in September with the Program...
AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates program involved reviewing documentation, conducting interviews with the Program Manager, on-site visits to verify implemented measures, and surveying 43 participants. The process aimed to assess program effectiveness, barriers, and participant experiences.
on 2011 Evaluation Report 3 PROCESS EVALUATION 3.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE PROCESS EVALUATION The process evaluation conducted on the BER program focuses on ENSC’s objective, which is “assessing the effectiveness of the program desig...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the process evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on assessing the effectiveness of program design and delivery. The evaluation was conducted through interviews with the Program Manager and telephone surveys with participants. The report also examines the content of the BER program manual, which serves as an essential tool for staff and evaluators.
year of activities and be included in the program manual. For each activity, the plans should identify the performance indicators to be collected for monitoring and evaluation purposes. > Complete the program manual to keep track of change...
AI summary The document discusses the need to update and standardize the program manual for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including performance indicators for monitoring and evaluation. It also mentions the review of the BER program tracking sheet and the use of online documents to validate project details.
ne database). However, for certain projects, online documents were consulted to obtain and validate details on the measures installed, such as the number or type of product and the hours of operation. In general, the tracking sheet is usef...
AI summary The tracking sheet used for the Business Energy Rebates Program provides essential program administration data but lacks sufficient detail to fully evaluate energy savings or validate calculations. Improvements are recommended to enhance its usefulness for program monitoring and evaluation.
required for savings calculations. As it is featured now, the information in that cell does not allow the Evaluator to systematically validate the savings calculations by reproducing that calculation. The number of products, their characte...
AI summary The document highlights issues with the current tracking sheet used for savings calculations in energy efficiency programs, noting that it lacks systematic validation capabilities. It mentions that product details and standard values are used by program managers, and that some methodologies are based on Efficiency Vermont and US-EPA studies. Recommendations are made for adjustments to improve validation and consistency.
sselaer Polytechnic Institute (Bill VonNeaida, Dorene Maniccia, Allan Tweed), An analysis of the energy and cost savings potential of occupancy sensors for commercial lighting systems (August 2000). Ref.: 5725 9 Business Energy Rebates Pro...
AI summary The text discusses the need to reorganize the database structure for the Business Energy Rebates Program to allow for systematic validation of energy savings calculations. It suggests separating values like wattage and SEER into individual cells while retaining detailed equations for flexibility.
es site selection based on location for field activities. Presenting the address information in three cells – street address, city and postal code – will greatly facilitate this process. > Ensure that all fields are systematically filled i...
AI summary The document emphasizes the importance of accurate and standardized data entry in tracking sheets to improve field activities and savings validation. It highlights issues such as missing postal codes and bill account numbers, and suggests implementing drop-down lists to ensure consistency in data entry.
tors and Drives category is identified in three different ways. This will facilitate the site sampling process and the savings validation once a systematic validation can be conducted. Ref.: 5725 10 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficien...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates Program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, has seen significant growth in participation, with 106 participants in 2011 compared to 13 in the first year. The program was upgraded with streamlined application processes, market push strategies, and free-rider screening. Econoler provided recommendations for further improvements.
process flow chart was also developed by ENSC in order to make the program participation procedures clearer. However, Econoler has the following recommendations regarding program design and delivery: > Develop an evaluation plan in paralle...
AI summary Econoler recommends developing an evaluation plan alongside program design, monitoring application processing delays, and informing participants about expected savings from the Business Energy Rebates Program. These measures aim to improve program rigor and customer satisfaction.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.5 ENSC WEBSITE Customers can consult the ENSC website to find a large amount of information regarding the program, such as a list of rebates and eligibility criteria for the five...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the ENSC website's role in providing information on the BER program, including rebate details and eligibility criteria. It also highlights participant perspectives from a telephone survey, noting that 21% of participants had previously participated in other energy programs.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.2 Program Awareness The most common way organizations heard about the BER program was through contractors or vendors (60%), followed by word of mouth through a business associat...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights that the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program was most commonly discovered by organizations through contractors or vendors (60%), followed by word of mouth (53%). ENSC's literature, website, and staff efforts also contributed to program awareness. High word of mouth suggests program satisfaction.
2010 (#) 2011 (%) Second Motivations Most Second Most Most Most Important Important Important Important Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Sample Size 11 11 43 43 Save on energy costs/bills 6 3 44% 21% Take advantage of program 3...
AI summary The table presents survey results on motivations for participating in energy efficiency programs, with the majority of respondents citing saving on energy costs and taking advantage of program incentives as their primary motivations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Respondents were asked their motivations for installing energy-efficient equipment. Among those who had implemented lighting measures (n = 34), savings on energy costs was the most...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights that saving on energy costs is the primary motivation for installing energy-efficient equipment, with 84% of respondents citing this as their main reason. Improving lighting conditions and taking advantage of rebates were also important but less frequently mentioned.
2011 HVAC New Motors Compressed Refrig- Lighting Equipment/ All Measures or VSDs Air erators Upgrades Motivations 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Imp. Imp. Imp. Imp. Imp. Imp. Imp. Imp. I...
AI summary The text presents a breakdown of motivations for implementing energy efficiency measures, such as HVAC upgrades, lighting improvements, and equipment upgrades, with percentages and counts indicating the importance of factors like cost savings, environmental benefits, and program incentives.
10 88% Yes 1 9% Don’t know 2% Ref.: 5725 16 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.4 Energy Attitudes Nearly all respondents believe reducing energy usage (98%) and managing energy cos...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates Program evaluation report highlights that nearly all respondents (98%) believe reducing energy usage is important, and 93% consider managing energy costs important. Respondents are also likely to purchase energy-efficient products in the future, similar to 2010 results.
ery important’ and 1= ‘not at all important’ All respondents are likely to purchase energy-efficient products when installing or replacing products in the future, which is similar to 2010 results. Table 12: Likelihood of Purchasing Energy-...
AI summary The survey indicates that respondents are very likely to purchase energy-efficient products in the future, similar to 2010 results. However, most participants had not engaged in other programs before or after the BER program, suggesting potential timing issues or a need for increased promotion of ENSC's other programs.
. This could be a mere timing issue since their participation was fairly recent. However, ENSC could still promote additional actions to participants by providing information on its other programs. Ref.: 5725 17 Business Energy Rebates Pro...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) had a significant influence on participants' decisions to implement energy efficiency measures, with rebates being the most impactful factor (mean 7.3) followed by initial contact information (mean 6.4).
atest influence on the decision (mean of 7.3 on an importance scale from 0 to 10). The information received during the initial contact was also deemed important by program participants (mean of 6.4). Table 13: Influence of Program Elements...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program's influence on participation was evaluated, with ENSC rebates and initial information being the most important factors. The mean scores for these elements were 7.3 and 6.4, respectively, indicating their significant impact on program engagement.
rporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 IMPACT EVALUATION 4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the program for 2011. Both energy and demand savings were c...
AI summary The impact evaluation for 2011 assesses the program's energy and demand savings by analyzing factors such as savings methodology, installation rates, and free-ridership. It involved on-site visits, participant surveys, and interviews to verify data and establish adjustment ratios for energy savings calculations.
cts. These 130 projects were implemented by 106 participants and covered different measures. Table 17 presents the weight in terms of savings for each category for all the projects completed in 2011. In order to ensure that the on-site vis...
AI summary The document discusses the implementation of 130 energy efficiency projects by 106 participants, with a focus on sampling strategies for on-site visits. Lighting measures accounted for the largest share of savings, and sampling was adjusted to prioritize these categories due to their significant impact on total savings.
of total savings. Thus, the remaining seven sites to be sampled, after the selection based on technology, were allocated to lighting measures, for a total of eight on-site visits for this category. Table 17: Energy Savings per Category for...
AI summary The document outlines energy savings data categorized by type, including lighting, HVAC, and refrigeration, with a focus on sampling sites in regions near major city centres. The Business Energy Rebates Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation are highlighted in the context of a 2011 evaluation report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For lighting measures, energy savings varied from 336 kWh to 1,087,932 kWh per site. In order to include both sites with significant energy savings and sites with lower energy savin...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses energy savings from lighting measures, stratifying sites based on energy savings. It outlines an on-site visit protocol for data collection and describes the methodology for calculating gross savings from completed projects in the BER program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For the 11 on-site visits conducted, gross energy savings values were adjusted based on the hours of operation declared during on-site visits, when necessary. Currently, the hours o...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses adjustments to energy savings calculations based on hours of operation for refrigeration measures, using fixed values from Efficiency Vermont’s TRM. On-site visits were primarily for quality assurance, and sample sizes were too small to establish reliable adjustments for all categories. No adjustments were made for compressed air or laundry measures due to lack of site visits.
dry measures, as no site visit was conducted for these categories. However, for future evaluations, the evaluator recommends conducting on-site visits for these categories 4.2.1 Lighting Measures When the wattage information for the old eq...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of lighting measures, noting that standard wattage values are used when old equipment wattage is unavailable. On-site visits for eight sites allowed more accurate demand savings calculations, resulting in a 1.9% reduction in total demand savings for lighting products.
site visits conducted represented a total reduction of 19.33 kW, or 1.9 percent of the total demand savings for lighting products. This reduction was applied to the total tracked demand savings value. The hours of operation collected for e...
AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates Program found that eight on-site visits for lighting products resulted in a 1.9% reduction in demand savings and a 0.9% reduction in energy savings. The evaluator recommends increasing the number of on-site visits to improve the accuracy of savings adjustments for this category of measures.
ds increasing the number of on-site visits conducted for this category of measures in order to obtain adjustment values that could be applied to all projects in this category. 4.2.2 HVAC Measures Savings calculations are based on efficienc...
AI summary The document discusses adjustments made to energy and demand savings calculations for HVAC measures based on findings from a single on-site visit. The visit revealed discrepancies in system usage, leading to reductions in both energy and demand savings for the category.
o be noted that since only one on-site visit was conducted for this category, and considering the unexpected nature of the findings, no further adjustment was applied to savings for the HVAC category. The Evaluator recommends that the PM c...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights the need for the Program Manager (PM) to confirm equipment usage with participants before using default full load hours to avoid overestimating savings. It also recommends increasing on-site visits for HVAC and motor/drives measures to improve accuracy in savings calculations. A commissioning factor was not applied due to lack of evidence that commissioning occurred.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report conducted, savings were calculated using a load profile approach and were compared with the savings in the tracking sheet. Such an approach allows considering unique site conditions...
AI summary The report discusses adjustments to energy and demand savings calculations for motor and drives measures, resulting in a 0.9% increase in demand savings and an 11.9% decrease in energy savings. It also highlights the need for more on-site visits for these measures.
nt. The evaluator recommends increasing the number of on-site visits conducted for this category of measures and including on-site visits for motor installations. 4.2.4 Occupancy Sensor Measures Savings are calculated as a percentage of re...
AI summary The evaluator suggests increasing on-site visits for motor installations and occupancy sensor measures. Savings for occupancy sensors are calculated based on reduced hours of operation and lamp wattage. One on-site visit increased energy savings by 0.1 percent for the category, but the adjustment was not applied universally due to limited data from a single site.
ings during peak load, considering that lighting usage reductions occur during the whole peak load period, as presented in Efficiency Vermont TRM. The data collected on site for occupancy sensors did Ref.: 5725 27 Business Energy Rebates P...
AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates Program found that occupancy sensors did not reduce demand during peak load periods, as lighting systems remained in use. This led to demand savings being reduced to 0 kW for all projects in the occupancy sensor category. The Evaluator recommends collecting more data on usage reduction periods and increasing on-site visits to improve accuracy.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of their activities and performance.
Table 19: Evaluation Results – Revised Gross Savings Lighting Measures Motor and Compressed HVAC Laundry For Non- For Occupancy Refrigeration Measure Category Drives Air Systems Systems Systems refrigerated Refrigeration Sensors Systems Sy...
AI summary This table presents the evaluation results for revised gross savings under various lighting and energy measures, including compressed air systems, HVAC systems, and refrigeration systems. It details total program tracking savings, demand savings, energy savings adjustments, and line loss factors across different categories.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically how replacing regular lighting with efficient lighting and installing occupancy sensors in the BER program affects heating and cooling loads. A -7.7% interactive effects factor was applied, based on a 1992 study by ADS for Hydro-Québec using DOE2 software simulations on electrically heated buildings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Table 20: Interactive Effects Factor for Lighting Products† % Commercial Interactive Effects8 Parameters Buildings Electric heating with air conditioning 14.71% -43.4% Electric heat...
AI summary The document presents data on interactive effects factors for lighting products in commercial buildings, highlighting variations based on heating and air conditioning configurations. It also mentions that gross savings, including these interactive effects, are detailed in Table 21.
ions for these products. The gross savings including interactive effects factor are presented in Table 21. Table 21: Gross Savings at the Meter – Including Interactive Effects Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Lighting Lighting Meas...
AI summary The text presents Table 21, which shows gross energy and demand savings from the BER program, including interactive effects factors. After applying these factors, total gross savings are estimated at 8.436 GWh for energy and 1.710 MW for demand.
1.977 MW 1.977 MW 1.977 MW 0.75 1.483 MW from ENSC Evaluation Results 1.963 MW 1.895 MW 1.710 MW 0.83 1.419 MW The net energy values calculated were compared to the program tracked savings for 2011. The values calculated were slightly lowe...
AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates program in 2011 found that calculated net energy values were slightly lower than tracked savings due to adjustments from on-site visits and an interactive effects factor. The NTGR used in the evaluation was higher than the one used for tracked savings, but this did not offset the reduction in energy savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken during that period.
Program Manual 4. Complete the program manual to keep track of changes and standardize Content the content: The program manual is well written but important information that would serve as “program memory” in case of modifications or staff...
AI summary The document outlines improvements needed for the program manual and tracking sheet, including standardizing content, breaking down savings calculation values into separate cells, and including measure sub-categories for better organization and validation of energy efficiency programs.
asures include several sub-categories. This is the case for Compressed Air, HVAC, Lighting, Motors and Drives and Refrigeration. The savings calculation approach is often very different from one sub-category to the other. Moreover, baselin...
AI summary The document discusses the need to improve data management practices in energy efficiency programs. It highlights the importance of breaking down measure sub-categories and address information for better data analysis and field activity planning. It also emphasizes the need for systematic data entry to ensure completeness in tracking sheets.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Program 9. Standardize the entries: To prevent the same information from being entered Tracking Sheet in different ways in the tracking sheet, ENSC should integrate a drop-down list...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) outlines recommendations to improve program tracking and evaluation. It suggests standardizing data entry, developing evaluation plans in parallel with program design, and monitoring application processing delays to ensure timely incentive disbursement.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an analysis of their programs and initiatives related to energy efficiency.
15. Provide information to participants on program portfolio: The results show Participant Perspectives a very positive attitude and a high level of motivation toward energy efficiency among participants. However, survey results indicate t...
AI summary The BER program has received positive participant feedback, but there is limited spillover effect as most participants did not engage in other programs or purchase energy-efficient products. Suggestions include increasing program promotion and conducting more on-site visits for compressed air, laundry, and lighting measures to improve evaluation accuracy.
t was applied on savings for the lighting category. The evaluator recommends increasing the number of on-site visits conducted for this category of measures in order to obtain adjustment values that could be applied to all projects in this...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations to increase on-site visits for energy efficiency measures in lighting, HVAC, and motors and drives categories to improve accuracy in savings calculations and reduce overestimation risks.
es Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Impact 21. Increase the number of on-site visits for the occupancy sensors category: Evaluation In order to be able to consider the impact of occupancy sensors on peak demand, th...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) evaluation report recommends increasing on-site visits for occupancy sensors and refrigeration measures to better assess energy savings and collect additional data such as temperature, usage hours, and heating sources during C&I telephone surveys to improve evaluation accuracy.
s that are not qualified for the incentive? Q: If yes what is the percentage of these requests that are not admissible? Q: Do you keep a record of these non-admissible requests per type of measure? FAQ C: It’s a good practice to confirm pr...
AI summary The text discusses questions and comments regarding the Business Energy Rebates program, including eligibility criteria, application processing times, inspection practices, and the clarity of the program manual. Concerns are raised about the admissibility of incentives, communication with participants, and the accessibility of the program documentation.
calculations are done with the algorithms imbedded in the database, but our question is: Will the participant eventually know what will be the savings that he should expect from each measure? Page 8 Q: The table of incentives for each meas...
AI summary The document discusses concerns about the clarity and usability of the Business Energy Rebates program manual, including repeated sections, missing form elements, and the need for simplification. Questions are raised about who fills out the worksheets and where the data comes from.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q: Please describe who are the program partners and what are their roles. This should guide us in asking the appropriate questions in the process evaluation. (Sales leads, marketing...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions for evaluating the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including inquiries about program partners, design considerations, barriers, evaluation plans, marketing strategies, and database usability. It also includes an interview guide for participants in the program evaluation.
mber 20, 2011 Interviewer: Date of Interview: Company Contacted: Respondent Name: Title: Phone Number: Hello, my name is from Econoler. Hello, may I please speak with _? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. Person responsible currently unavailab...
AI summary This document outlines an interview conducted by Econoler on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Business Energy Rebates Program. The purpose is to gather feedback from participants regarding their experience and additional purchases of energy-efficient products since joining the program.
kept strictly confidential and that we will not share the information you provide with any other party in a way that could identify your individual or corporate responses. Recording of the Interview Please note that the interview will be r...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for an interview regarding energy efficiency measures, including validation of hours of operation and confirmation of additional measures implemented after participation in the BER program. It emphasizes confidentiality and the use of a recording for documentation purposes.
September 29, 2011 Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] [INTRODUCTION] Hello, I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an...
AI summary This text is an introduction to a survey conducted by CRA on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Business Energy Rebates Program. The survey aims to gather feedback from participants to improve the program. Nova Scotia Power is mentioned as the former sponsor of the program.
V2. Is there someone else at your company or organization who would know about your company / organization’s participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Business Energy Rebates Program? 1. Yes (Ask for name: and telephone #: _) (Thank and te...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process aimed at identifying the most knowledgeable individual within a company or organization regarding their participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Business Energy Rebates Program. It includes steps to determine if another person is more familiar with the program and instructions for contacting the appropriate individual.
R PARTICIPATING [P SERIES] P1. Did your company or organization participate in any other Nova Scotia Power or Efficiency Nova Scotia programs before the Business Energy Rebates Program? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to P4) 98. (Don’t know) (Go to P4) 9...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions from a survey regarding participation in Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, specifically asking about prior participation in programs before the Business Energy Rebates Program and how respondents learned about the Business Energy Rebates Program.
A5 = HVAC; THEN ASK VA9 FIRST TIME THROUGH THEN NOT AGAIN IF THE ANSWER IS NO. IF THE ANSWER IN VA9 IS YES, REPEAT VA7/VA8 FOR EVERY OTHER MEASURE CATEGORY IN SAMPLE THAT HAS BEEN VERIFIED IN VA1-VA5 VA7. What ONE factor was most important...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process to determine factors motivating companies and organizations to install energy-efficient equipment, with specific focus on HVAC and other measure categories. It includes a list of potential motivations, such as program rebates, energy cost savings, and recommendations from utility representatives.
s Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The Efficiency Nova Scotia _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused rebate(s) b. Information received during the initial contact by the _ Res...
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates Program. It includes survey questions about participants' reasons for applying for rebates and whether they implemented additional energy-efficient measures after participating.
y additional energy-efficient measures on its own in any Nova Scotia location of your company 1 Yes 2 No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 65 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SP2. [I...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the implementation of energy-efficient measures by businesses participating in the Business Energy Rebates Program. It asks about the timing of implementation and whether other financing or rebates were used.
1. Yes 2. No 96. (Don’t know) SP4b. Heating, Ventilating and Air conditioning (HVAC) measures? 1. Yes 2. No 96. (Don’t know) Ref.: 5725 66 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SP4c. Lighting mea...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking participants about their adoption of energy-efficient measures and the influence of the program on their decisions. The survey includes multiple choice and rating scale questions.
program was “extremely influential in your decision to implement additional energy-efficient measures.” [RECORD RESPONSE 0-10, 98 = Don’t know, 99 = REFUSED] DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE Ref.: 5725 67 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebates Program and includes survey questions about participants' experiences with the program, including satisfaction with application processes, communication, rebate amounts, and likelihood of future participation in energy efficiency initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1. Significantly 2. Somewhat 3. Slightly, or 4. Not at all 96 (Depends on what the figure or illustration would have been) 97. (This kind of document already exists) 98. (Don’t know...
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2011. It includes a questionnaire with response options and categories for firmographics, such as company activity types.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report F3. Approximately how many full-time equivalent workers DOES YOUR COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION employ at all locations within Nova Scotia? 1. Fewer than 5 2. 5 to 9 3. 10 to 19 4. 20 to...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, containing a series of questions related to employment numbers, business operating hours, company structure, and business locations in Nova Scotia.
END. Those are all the questions I have for you. I thank you very much for your time and cooperation and have a nice day! Ref.: 5725 71 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX VI – ON-SITE...
AI summary The document text includes a section from an evaluation report on Business Energy Rebates by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, specifically Appendix VI, which outlines an on-site visit protocol for assessing building heating and cooling systems.
e at the site Heating system 1 Heating system 2 Heating system 3 Heating system 4 Heat source Heating system type Heating system efficiency or COP Cooling system: Please fill the table below for each cooling source at the site Cooling syst...
AI summary The text includes tables for heating and cooling systems, facility operation hours, and lighting usage, along with a reference to a 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on Business Energy Rebates.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Normal week/holidays Please fill the table below for each lighting schedule reported by the site contact lighting operation schedule as usage could vary for each section of the faci...
AI summary The document provides a template for reporting lighting operation schedules and measures information as part of an evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes sections for recording installation dates, usage hours, and schedule numbers for different lighting sections.
for equipment [h/day] (From database): Hours of use for equipment: Indicate the corresponding schedule number for each section: Hours of use for equipment: Indicate the corresponding annual hours: % time with lights and cooling ON: Yes Coo...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for recording equipment usage hours, lighting and cooling/heating system information, and lamp status. It includes prompts for verifying installation, usage patterns, and replacement plans, primarily related to energy efficiency and facility management.
replacement lamps or retrofit kit (specify)? Is product LED screw- ENERGYSTAR® in/pin-based rated? If not lamps/bulbs available, collect and product number. Downlight Is product ENERGYSTAR® rated? If not LED Strip ft ft Wt/ft available, co...
AI summary The text outlines a process for collecting product information, specifically for LED lighting products, including lamps, retrofit kits, downlights, strip lights, and streetlights/parking lights. It requests details such as product numbers and ENERGYSTAR® ratings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report New equipment installed Existing equipment Number Wattage Number Wattage Additional Additional Type From Site From Site Type From Contact From Contact information information databa...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation outlines the installation of new equipment and the status of existing equipment, focusing on LED traffic and pedestrian signals. It includes data on the number and wattage of equipment, as well as a check on whether the products meet ENERGYSTAR® and Institute for transportation engineer specifications.
Metal Halide? Was a HPS or Metal Pulse Start Metal Halide - Halide Fixture Fixture installed? Is HPS or Metal Electronic Ballast Halide Fixture Metal Halide - installed? Fixture Ref.: 5725 77 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text refers to a 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the Business Energy Rebates program, discussing energy-efficient lighting fixtures such as Metal Halide and HPS fixtures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report New equipment installed Existing equipment Number Wattage Number Wattage Additional Additional Type From Site From Site Type From Contact From Contact information information databa...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation details installed and existing equipment, including induction lamps and T5 High-Bay fixtures, with information on wattage, site validation, and product certifications.
How many lamps are installed per fixture? Does it meet UL Is it an incandescent LED exit sign 924? or fluorescent exit illuminated LED - sign? Lamps Is product Is the existing lamp Photoluminescent ENERGYSTAR® an incandescent or - exit sig...
AI summary The document includes a form for reporting the installation of LED exit signs and photoluminescent exit signs, including questions about compliance with standards and the type of lamps used. It also references an evaluation report related to the Business Energy Rebates program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
ort VSD Date of installation (From database): Date of installation (Contact declaration): Total number of equipment installed – From database: Total number of equipment installed – Site validation: Use additional sheets if required VSD 1 V...
AI summary This document contains a form for recording information about variable speed drives (VSDs) installed under the Business Energy Rebates program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for installation dates, equipment details, operational status, and load profiles.
iciency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Equipment heating capacity, if a heat pump is installed (Btu/hr) – From database: Equipment heating capacity, if a heat pump is installed (Btu/hr) – On site validation: Equipment SEER...
AI summary The document contains data collection forms related to energy efficiency programs, including heat pump performance metrics, occupancy sensors, and equipment validation procedures. It outlines fields for gathering information on equipment capacity, usage hours, and installation details.
if several types are encountered per OCC, indicate each type (On site validation): Number – Lamps controlled by OCC; if several types are encountered per OCC, indicate each type (On site validation): Wattage of lamps controlled by (From da...
AI summary The document contains forms and tables related to energy usage and equipment details, specifically focusing on lighting, cooling, heating, and refrigeration systems. It includes information on wattage, operation hours, and equipment schedules, likely for the purpose of evaluating energy efficiency programs.
PA1 Score: (FR2a ; FR2b) IF PRE-SCREENING: 0% FR3. If your company had not received the rebateoffered by the program, would you have paid for the full cost of the energy-efficient measures, FR3 = Answer x 10% including the portion covered...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring methodology for evaluating the impact of energy efficiency programs, focusing on factors such as rebate influence, customer behavior, and program effectiveness, using a series of questions and formulas to calculate scores.
Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SMART LIGHTING CHOICES PROGRAM IMPACT EVALUATION 2011 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report February 21, 2012 Smart Lighting Choices Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 E...
AI summary This document is the 2011 evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It provides an assessment of the program's impact during that year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation dated 2011, likely assessing the performance or outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives or programs.
r Lighting Products ............................................................. 20 Table 11: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator ........................................ 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Smart Lightin...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Smart Lighting Choices program, which provides financial incentives to distributors in Nova Scotia to promote the sale of energy-efficient lighting products. The evaluation included interviews with the Program Manager and distributors, as well as on-site visits.
lamps: - 32 W high-performance T8 (HPT8) lamps (HPT8-32W) - 28 W reduced-wattage T8 lamps (RW-T8-28W) - 25 W reduced-wattage T8 lamps (RW-T8-25W); and > HPT8 ballasts. The program is both a resource acquisition and a market transformation...
AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, aimed to achieve 8.04 GWh of electricity savings in 2011. It includes high-performance T8 lamps, reduced-wattage T8 lamps, and HPT8 ballasts. The program also incorporated the Upstream Business Energy Rebates (UBER) sub-program, which targeted specific energy-efficient products and was evaluated under the SLC program.
a Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The SLC program aimed at achieving net electricity savings of 8.04 GWh in 2011. KEY FINDINGS The 2011 evaluation of the SLC program demonstrated that the latter is well designed and has a good potential...
AI summary The SLC program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2011, with net energy savings of 7.954 GWh and demand savings of 2.050 MW. The program's success was supported by increased product sales and a 19% free-ridership level, leading to a net-to-gross ratio of 0.81.
Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.81 The evaluation revealed that the SLC program had generated net energy savings of 7.954 GWh and demand savings of 2.050 MW at the generator in 2011. Ref.: 5725 v Smart Lighting Choices Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The evaluation of the Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) found that the program generated 7.954 GWh of net energy savings and 2.050 MW of demand savings at the generator in 2011. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for the SLC program was 0.81, indicating the proportion of gross savings that were net savings after accounting for interactive effects.
d. Lastly, the PM should develop a tracking sheet that allows monitoring savings for the whole year instead of completing individual monthly reports as is currently the case. SLC-R2. Collect additional information through telephone surveys...
AI summary The document recommends developing a tracking sheet to monitor annual savings rather than monthly reports and suggests collecting additional data through telephone surveys with commercial and industrial customers to better understand retrofit activities and their impact on energy savings.
Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program is both a resource acquisition and a market transform...
AI summary The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, which includes the Upstream Business Energy Rebates (UBER) sub-program, aims to promote the use of high-performance T8 lamps and ballasts by providing financial incentives to distributors. The program targets non-residential facilities and seeks to achieve electricity savings through market transformation.
ard practices. Through these goals, the program aimed at achieving net electricity savings of 8.04 GWh in 2011. In 2010, the SLC program generated net energy savings of 6.24 GWh. Eligible Products Under the SLC program, the prescribed prod...
AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program aimed to achieve electricity savings through the promotion of energy-efficient lighting products. In 2010, the program achieved 6.24 GWh in net energy savings, with a target of 8.04 GWh in 2011. Rebates were offered for T8 lamps and HPT8 ballasts, while the UBER sub-program included a range of eligible products such as LED downlights and wall packs.
ting Diode (LED) Flat $15 rebate Downlights LED Wall Packs Flat $100 rebate T5 High Bay Fixtures Flat $60 rebate T8 High Bay Fixtures Flat $45 rebate 45% of listed price or $40, Occupancy Sensors whichever is lower 45% of listed price or $...
AI summary The document outlines rebate amounts for various energy-efficient lighting and control systems under the Smart Lighting Choices Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes specific rebate values for LED products, occupancy sensors, and other energy-saving technologies.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Participating Distributors As of November 2011, the ten distributors listed below are participating in the SLC program; two additions have been made to the eight listed in the progr...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, including participating distributors and the program logic model. It outlines the causal links between program activities and expected market changes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 2 METHODOLOGY 2.1 METHODOLOGICAL MODEL The 2011 evaluation of the SLC program included an impact evaluation through which program energy savings were assessed. For 2011, the SLC pro...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation focused on assessing energy savings through an impact evaluation. A process evaluation was not conducted in 2011 as no major changes had occurred since the 2010 evaluation. The methodology included analyzing program documentation and conducting in-depth interviews with the program manager.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November, ten on-site visits were conducted at facilities in which SLC products had been installed. They were conducted by Econoler’s subcontractor, Equilibr...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses on-site visits conducted in November to validate the installation of SLC products. These visits were carried out by Equilibrium Engineering and used data from tracking sheets and interviews with site energy managers to verify installations and hours of operation.
PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET A tracking sheet is not used to monitor savings for the SLC program. However, invoices provided by distributors and monthly reporting sheets developed by the PM were reviewed. Econoler reviewed the content of some of...
AI summary The document outlines the process for tracking savings under the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program, including the review of invoices and monthly reporting sheets. Issues with incomplete invoice data and the approval of such invoices by the Program Manager are noted.
lues for the fields listed above. Nevertheless, these invoices were approved by the PM. The missing information might not be essential for program administration but is useful for evaluation purposes. For each sale, the information in the...
AI summary The evaluation of the Smart Lighting Choices Program highlights that while invoices contain necessary information for rebate administration, additional details such as product specifications are missing. The Program Manager uses product numbers to determine lamp wattage and ballast types for tracking savings. The Evaluator suggests improvements to invoice consistency and program evaluation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Develop a tracking sheet that monitors program savings for the whole year: The data from the invoices could be used to track the quantity of products sold along with program savin...
AI summary The report suggests developing a tracking sheet to monitor program savings using invoice data and provides a template for distributors to standardize data entry. This would improve data consistency, quality control, and ease of information transfer into the general tracking sheet.
e quality control process on the tracking sheets to ensure that the required data is submitted. Finally, it would make the transfer of information into the general tracking sheet easier. > Make sure that all fields are filled in systematic...
AI summary The text discusses the need for improved data submission processes and invoice completion to ensure program evaluation accuracy. It highlights the importance of systematic data entry and the need for distributors to provide more detailed product information on invoices.
ency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 IMPACT EVALUATION 4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the program for 2011. Both energy and demand savings were conside...
AI summary The 2011 impact evaluation assesses the energy and demand savings of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's program. It considers factors like savings calculation methods, installation rates, and on-site visits to verify technology installations and collect operational data.
sits for each stratum. Table 4: Size of Ballast and Lamp Transactions at the Time of Sampling Ballasts Lamps Stratum 1: Less Stratum 2: 100 Stratum 1: Less Stratum 2: 100 than 100 Units Units or More per than 100 Units Units or More per pe...
AI summary The text includes a table summarizing ballast and lamp transaction data across different strata, along with a list of preferred regions for site selection, including Halifax, Dartmouth, Sydney, and others. It also references an evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report On-Site Visit Protocol An on-site visit protocol listing the information to be collected was developed for each site, including the type, wattage and number of old products and new...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the on-site visit protocol used to collect data on energy efficiency products installed, as well as the method for calculating gross savings. It highlights the need to avoid double counting of rebates across different programs and provides details on the number of lamps and ballasts considered for energy savings calculations.
urchases made through the SBES and C&IC programs, a total of 257,897 lamps and 75,083 ballasts were considered for energy and demand savings calculations. 4.3.1 Unitary Savings Calculation Review As presented before, there were two types o...
AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program evaluated energy savings from T8 lamps and HPT8 ballasts. Unitary savings values were calculated based on the wattage difference between baseline T12-34 W lamps and the new T8 lamps. These values were used to calculate program savings and were not modified during the evaluation.
W 34 W – 32 W = 2 W RW-T8-28 W 34 W – 28 W = 6 W RW-T8-25 W 34 W – 25 W = 9 W HPT8 lamps are characterized by a higher lumen production per watt compared to standard T8 lamps. The National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT) indicates...
AI summary The text discusses the energy efficiency of HPT8 lamps compared to T12 lamps, noting higher lumens per watt and potential for de-lamping. It outlines the methodology used to calculate ballast savings for HPT8 ballasts based on wattage differences and unit sales in 2010. Econoler recommends further investigation of de-lamping during future evaluations by ENSC.
ble%20with%20Lumens.pdf (website visited on November 21, 2011). 2 CEE, High Performance T8 Specification, http://www.cee1.org/com/com-lt/com-lt-specs.pdf (website visited on November 21, 2011). Ref.: 5725 13 Smart Lighting Choices Program...
AI summary The document discusses the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, presenting baseline and new equipment wattage values along with unitary savings for various lighting products. Ballast factor values are noted for old magnetic ballasts and new HPT8 ballasts.
Table 6: HPT8 Ballast Unitary Savings Unitary Savings New Unitary Savings for Baseline Lamp for Ballasts – New Ballast and Lamp Equipment Ballasts – from Wattage Savings Used for Systems Wattage Tracking Sheet (W) (W) Evaluation (W) (W) (W...
AI summary The table presents unitary savings data for various ballast and lamp systems, comparing baseline wattage with new equipment and calculating savings for different configurations. It includes data for 1-lamp, 2-lamp, 3-lamp, and 4-lamp systems using HPT8 and RW-T8 lamps.
71.0 18.0 23.0 22.4 RW-T8-28 W lamps 3-lamp ballasts with 112.0 63.0 27.0 22.0 RW-T8-25 W lamps 4-lamp ballasts with 144.0 107.0 8.0 29.0 HPT8-32 W lamps 4-lamp ballasts with 144.0 94.0 24.0 26.0 27.4 RW-T8-28 W lamps 4-lamp ballasts with...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of average unitary savings for different ballast systems in the Smart Lighting Choices Program, using weighted averages based on lamp sales percentages from 2011, including RW-T8-25W, RW-T8-28W, and HPT8-32W lamps.
ary savings for each type of ballasts were recalculated using the percentage of each type of lamps sold for 2011. The table below presents the revised unitary savings value for each type of ballasts. Table 7: HPT8 Ballast Savings for 2011...
AI summary The text discusses the recalculations of energy savings for different types of ballasts based on 2011 lamp sales data and provides product sales information for the UBER sub-program in 2011.
t was used since it came from a more recent source. Moreover, the average hours of operation value from the OPA was in line with the value obtained from on-site visits. 4.3.4 Installation Rate As part of the evaluation, information on the...
AI summary The text discusses challenges in evaluating the installation rate and replacement ratio for energy efficiency programs. On-site visits provided limited data due to end-users' lack of accurate information on product installation locations. An installation rate of 100% was assumed for T8 lamps and HPT8 ballasts in the SLC program. For T8 to T8 replacements, a telephone survey is recommended to assess the impact on unitary savings.
s. 3 Ontario Power Authority (OPA), “2011 Quasi Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions,” http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/evaluation-measurement-and-verification/measures-assumptions-lists. Ref.: 5725 17 Smart Lighting Choices Program Effici...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program discusses the calculation of diversity factor and revised gross savings. The diversity factor of 73% was determined based on peak demand periods and facility schedules. Revised gross savings were calculated using adjusted wattage values, hours of operation, installation rates, and a line loss factor of 1.062 provided by Nova Scotia Power.
or each category of commercial and industrial customers, with the total customer sales of the corresponding projects. The line loss factor values were provided by Nova Scotia Power for each rate code. The total savings obtained for each pr...
AI summary The text discusses energy and demand savings from the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program and its UBER sub-program, providing figures for gross energy savings at both the meter and generator levels, as well as demand savings. The data is presented in Table 9 from an evaluation report.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 9: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report includes Table 9, which presents evaluation results related to gross energy and demand savings.
Lamp Replacements – SLC Program HPT8 Ballasts – SLC Program UBER Sub- Product Category program HPT8-32W RW-T8-28 W RW-T8-25 W 1-Lamp 2-Lamp 3-Lamp 4-Lamp Number of Units Number of Units in the Program 134,241 122,592 1,064 4,899 43,547 4,6...
AI summary The text provides a detailed tracking sheet for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, listing the number of units replaced, installation rates, and energy and demand savings for various lamp and ballast products. It includes metrics like unitary savings, gross energy savings, and line loss factors.
r (MW) Diversity Factor 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% Total Gross Peak Demand Savings - 0.196 0.537 0.007 0.048 0.429 0.084 0.457 0.102 at Meter (MW) Line Loss Factor 1.062 1.062 1.062 1.062 1.062 1.062 1.062 1.062 Total Gross Demand Sav...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, particularly the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) and UBER sub-programs. Replacing regular lighting with efficient products increases heating load in winter and decreases cooling load in summer, impacting overall energy consumption.
and UBER sub-programs, replacement of regular lighting products with efficient lighting products causes an increase in the heating load during winter and a decrease in the cooling load during summer. An interactive effects factor of -7.7 p...
AI summary Replacing regular lighting with efficient lighting products increases heating load in winter and decreases cooling load in summer. An interactive effects factor of -7.7 percent, derived from a 1992 ADS study for Hydro-Québec using DOE2 software, was used to evaluate these impacts on commercial buildings heated entirely by electricity.
84 for the SLC program and of 0.75 for the UBER sub-program were used for tracked savings while NTGRs of 0.81 for the SLC program and of 1 for the UBER sub-program were used for program evaluation. Ref.: 5725 22 Smart Lighting Choices Prog...
AI summary The evaluation report compares net energy savings with tracked savings for the Smart Lighting Choices (SLC) program in 2011. The net savings were slightly higher due to increased hours of operation for SLC products, which offset reductions caused by an interactive effects factor and differences in NTGR values used for tracking and evaluation.
d estimate the savings generated for the whole year. At the moment, savings estimation is completed on a monthly basis by ENSC through individual monthly reports. 2. Provide distributors with a template listing the information required for...
AI summary The document discusses the need for improving savings estimation and data standardization in energy efficiency programs. Currently, savings are estimated monthly by ENSC, and there is a lack of uniformity in how distributors format and submit data, leading to inconsistencies and challenges in data consolidation and quality control.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, which likely discusses the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives in Nova Scotia during that year.
Program 4. Facilitate the tracking of products by requesting that distributors include Tracking the type of product purchased for each category: Currently, the only Sheet information available on a product is the category of product (lamp...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving program tracking and evaluation, including enhancing product tracking by distributors, investigating de-lamping retrofit activities, using telephone surveys to assess T8 to T8 lamp replacements, and collecting data on heating sources and air conditioning usage during C&I surveys.
ns, the Evaluator recommends that information on the heating source and on the use of air conditioning equipment at participants’ facilities be collected during the C&I telephone survey campaigns conducted by ENSC. This would provide for a...
AI summary The evaluator suggests collecting information on heating sources and air conditioning use during C&I telephone surveys by ENSC to better assess interactive effects. The document also includes a 2011 evaluation report on the Smart Lighting Choices Program and a discussion about legislation, cost savings, and market impacts.
consumer)? C: Since the end users are unknown (beside large customers) sales records of a previous year from retailer could give an identification of the program impact in the market. Source: Web Q: When referring to the CEE Web Site, whic...
AI summary The text discusses the Smart Lighting Choices Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including questions about program participation, reporting forms, and the need for clearer separation of sections in the program manual for participants, retailers, and ENSC. It also references an interview guide for distributors.
INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH DISTRIBUTORS DISTRIBUTOR INTERVIEW GUIDE ENSC SMART LIGHTING CHOICES PROGRAM November 1, 2011 Hello, may I please speak with _? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTIO...
AI summary This document is an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Smart Lighting Choices Program with distributors. It outlines how to identify and screen respondents who are knowledgeable about the program's products, such as T8 lamps and HPT8 ballasts.
OFFICE CONTACT - CONTINUE TO I2] _Don’t know [CONTINUE INTERVIEW WITH STORE MANAGER/HEAD OFFICE CONTACT - CONTINUE TO I2] _Refused [THANK AND TERMINATE] Confidentiality Ref.: 5725 28 Smart Lighting Choices Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Co...
AI summary The text outlines an interview process for collecting data on the sales of high-performance and low wattage T8 lamps under the Smart Lighting Choices Program. The interview includes confidentiality and recording notices, and asks about sales trends and potential reasons for changes in sales volume.
-performance and low wattage T8 lamps in 2011 will be significantly lower/higher (select the appropriate term) than for the previous year. Is there any reason for this change? [PROBE: market trend, more competitors offering these products,...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Smart Lighting Choices Program on the sales of high-performance and low wattage T8 lamps in 2011, asking whether the incentive influenced sales and by how much. It also inquires about other rebates offered for these products.
TO T4a] 2. No [GO TO T4] 98. (Don’t know) [GO TO T4] 99. (Refused) [GO TO T4] T3a. Which organization offered the rebate(s) and what was the value of the rebate(s)? 1. Store $ 2. Manufacturer1 (specify) $ 3. Manufacturer2 (specify) $ 4. Na...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to rebate providers and the importance of incentives in customer decisions for energy-efficient lighting, as well as the impact of program discontinuation. It references an evaluation report on the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
n available, do you think that your sales of HPT8 ballasts in 2011 would have been about the same or lower? 1. Same [GO TO E3] 2. Lower [GO TO E2a] Ref.: 5725 31 Smart Lighting Choices Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evalua...
AI summary The text is a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Smart Lighting Choices Program in 2011. It seeks to determine the impact of the program on sales of HPT8 ballasts and high-performance T8 lamps, including whether other rebates were available and their sources.
cial Government $ 7. City/Town/Municipality $ 97. Other $ 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) E4. In 2011, how important would you say the incentive from the Smart Lighting Choices Program was in customers’ decision to purchase HPT8 ballasts? P...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the importance of the Smart Lighting Choices Program's incentives in influencing customer purchases of HPT8 ballasts, as well as inquiries about the adequacy of the incentive amounts and their use for marketing purposes. It also references an evaluation report from 2011.
propriate amount? E8. Do you promote HPT8 ballasts as part of the Smart Lighting Choices Program? Is part of the ¢25 incentive used for marketing purposes? GENERAL IMPACT OF PROGRAM G1. Overall, do you think that the Smart Lighting Choices...
AI summary The text includes interview questions regarding the Smart Lighting Choices Program, its impact on businesses, and the use of incentives. It also includes an on-site visit protocol for evaluating the program's effectiveness.
2011 Evaluation Report 2 BUILDING HEATING/COOLING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Heating Source: Please fill the table below for each heating source at the site Heating system 1 Heating system 2 Heating system 3 Heating system 4 Heat source Heating sy...
AI summary The document provides a template for evaluating building heating and cooling systems, including their efficiency, and facility operation hours and lighting usage. It includes tables for filling in details about heating and cooling systems as well as occupancy schedules.
For example: seasonal closure) Total number of day per 261 104 261 104 261 104 year Ref.: 5725 35 Smart Lighting Choices Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Normal week/holidays Please fill the table below for...
AI summary The document outlines the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including lighting operation schedules and measures information such as the number of lamps installed. It focuses on the transition from baseline fluorescent T12 and T8 lamps to high-performance T8 lamps.
cent T8 lamps (Contact declaration): Total number – High performance T8 lamps installed (From database): Total number – High performance T8 lamps installed (On-site validation/Contact declaration): Collect the information for up to 3 secti...
AI summary The document provides data on the installation of high-performance T8 lamps as part of the Smart Lighting Choices Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including information collected from database entries and on-site validation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Type – Baseline Fluorescent T12 or T8 lamps (Contact declaration): Power – Existing Fluorescent T12 lamps [W] (Contact declaration/On site validation if spare lamps are available):...
AI summary The document outlines a 2011 evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes data collection forms for assessing the performance of fluorescent T12 and T8 lamps, including power usage, installation status, and hours of use, as well as validation procedures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report cooling are ON for each section (Contact declaration): Indicate the corresponding cooling system number for this section (Site validation/Contact declaration): Percent of the time w...
AI summary The document is a 2011 evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes data collection forms for assessing the installation of reduced wattage T8 lamps and baseline fluorescent lamps across up to three sections of a site.
information for up to 3 sections: Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Measure location: Date of installation: Type – Baseline Fluorescent T12 and/or T8 lamps (Contact declaration): Power – Existing Fluorescent T12 lamps [W] (Contact declaration/...
AI summary The document provides a template for collecting data on the installation and performance of reduced wattage T8 lamps under the Smart Lighting Choices Program. It includes sections for measuring lamp types, power consumption, installation dates, and usage patterns.
age of lights that remain ON when the facility is unoccupied, for each section (Contact declaration): Percent of the time when both lighting and cooling are ON for each section (Contact declaration): Indicate the corresponding cooling syst...
AI summary The text provides a template for collecting data on lighting and cooling/heating systems, including the number of baseline and HPT8 ballasts, dates of installation, and rebate claims. It is part of an evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
ion: Total number – Baseline ballasts (Contact declaration): Total number – HPT8 ballasts installed (From database): Total number – HPT8 ballasts installed (On-site validation/Contact declaration): Manufacturer name – Baseline ballast (Sit...
AI summary The text provides detailed data collection forms for assessing lighting systems, specifically baseline ballasts and HPT8 ballasts, including manufacturer details, model numbers, lamp counts, and usage schedules. It is part of an evaluation report for the Smart Lighting Choices Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
icate the corresponding cooling system number for this section (Site validation/Contact declaration): Percent of the time when both lighting and heating are ON for each section (Contact declaration): Indicate the corresponding heating syst...
AI summary This document contains forms related to lighting and heating system validation, including questions about lamp status, replacement plans, and the installation of High-performance T8 lamps. It also references the Smart Lighting Choices Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2011 evaluation report.
www.econoler.com COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CUSTOM AND NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION 2011 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report February 22, 2012 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program E...
AI summary This document is a final evaluation report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, published in February 2012. It assesses the program's impact and process.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, providing an assessment of energy efficiency initiatives and programs in the region during that year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, assessing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives during that period.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
................................................... 7 Figure 3: Methodological Model .............................................................................................................. 8 Ref.: 5725 v Commercial & Industrial Cust...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report assesses the Commercial and Industrial Custom Retrofit and New Construction programs managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The evaluation involved interviews, on-site visits, and surveys to analyze program performance and impact.
med 25 on-site visits as well as a telephone survey of 27 program participants. The analysis and program evaluation results are presented separately for each of the two C&I Custom program components. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The C&I Custom program...
AI summary The C&I Custom programs offer technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to medium and large C&I customers to reduce energy consumption and demand. The C&IC program component, launched in 2008, was upgraded in 2011 with improved staffing, focus on larger projects, and enhanced sales outreach to improve peak demand savings.
e promoted through the program so that they could be more proactive in marketing the program. The activities of the sales leads were included in the C&IC program, so the PM is now able to monitor the Ref.: 5725 vi Commercial & Industrial C...
AI summary The Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction (C&IC) program includes sales leads monitored by a Program Manager using performance indicators to assess effectiveness. The program aims for 43 GWh of net energy savings and nearly 10 MW of peak demand savings in 2011. The CINC component supports new and renovated commercial and industrial buildings with technical and financial assistance.
930 GWh in 2011, which represents a considerable increase in comparison to 2010 net savings (total of 19.413 GWh). It also realized generated 3.764 MW peak demand savings compared to 2.406 MW in 2010. Ref.: 5725 vii Commercial & Industrial...
AI summary The Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program (C&IC) saw increased participation and awareness in 2011, with ENSC's marketing efforts playing a key role. Participants also came from prior engagement with NSPI or ENSC programs, and the addition of sales leads contributed to the growth.
m a participation point of view, these are indications that program marketing efforts are improving from past years, which means that the program clearly evolved in the right direction. Satisfaction Satisfaction towards the C&IC program ha...
AI summary The C&IC program has seen improved satisfaction, particularly in staff interaction and communication, following a transition from NSPI to ENSC. Despite some concerns about the M&V process, overall satisfaction remains high. Energy savings were calculated through on-site visits and interviews, with adjustment factors used to estimate overall program savings.
Free-Ridership Level 7% Spillover Level 0% Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.93 The evaluation revealed that the C&IC and CINC programs had respectively generated net energy savings of 30.323 GWh and 2.607 GWh at the generator in 2011. Regarding electr...
AI summary The evaluation of the C&IC and CINC programs in 2011 showed higher net energy savings compared to ENSC's tracked savings, attributed to a reduction in free-ridership from 10% in 2010 to 7% in 2011. This improvement was due to an enhanced screening process implemented by ENSC for participants who signed the PDA in 2011.
ates should significantly help program participants develop their own M&V plan and is a first step toward standardizing the M&V activities performed under the C&IC program. C&IC-R2. Envisage performing third-party M&V for a number of C&IC...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for the C&IC program, suggesting that third-party monitoring and verification (M&V) should be used for certain projects to ensure compliance and reduce risk. It also mentions the importance of developing standardized M&V plans for program participants.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Recommendations for the CINC Program: CINC-R1. Conduct a separate complete evaluation for the CINC program: In 2010, only one new construction project was included in the C&IC progr...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report recommends conducting a separate evaluation for the CINC program due to its increasing impact and the need to address uncertainties in savings calculations. It also suggests comparing actual building consumption with design simulations to improve accuracy.
Even though such demand savings are very small per project, they could raise the overall impact of the program with future increases in the number of program participants. Ref.: 5725 xi Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction P...
AI summary The Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, provides technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to help medium and large C&I customers reduce energy consumption and demand through retrofit projects and highly-efficient new construction.
he other. 1.1 C&IC PROGRAM OVERVIEW This section presents the description of the C&IC program component, as well as the project and measure eligibility criteria. 1.1.1 Program Description Through the C&IC program component, incentives are...
AI summary The C&IC program provides incentives for eligible customers to conduct feasibility studies and implement energy efficiency improvements in existing facilities. It focuses on retrofit and improvement projects and supports a variety of initiatives. The program aims to achieve significant energy and peak demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1.1.2 Program Eligibility As stated in its program manual, project sites eligible to participate in the C&IC program must be institutional, charitable, commercial or industrial faci...
AI summary The C&IC program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) allows institutional, charitable, commercial, and industrial facilities served by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) with a peak demand of 250 kW or higher to participate. Projects must save at least 20 MWh annually and cannot include non-utility energy sources. Eligible measures include lighting and HVAC systems, while demand limiting controls and cogeneration are ineligible.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 1.2 CINC PROGRAM OVERVIEW The next sections present the description of the CINC program component as well as its main eligibility criteria. 1.2.1 Program Description ENSC launched t...
AI summary The CINC program, launched by ENSC in 2010, provides technical and financial support to commercial and industrial customers to reduce energy consumption. It offers incentives for new construction and major renovations, with three participation paths: NCCP, NCWB, and Prescriptive Rebate.
l or not-for-profit new constructions. 2 FRANKEL, Mark et al., “Core Performance Guide: Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Edition 1.00,” New Building Institute – Advanced Buildings Program, 2010. Ref.: 5725 3 Commercial & Industrial Custo...
AI summary The Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction (CINC) program offers different paths for incentives, including the New Construction Prescriptive Rebate path, which functions similarly to the BER program. ENSC facilitates the process for small construction projects under CINC while providing financial incentives through BER.
eving net electricity savings of approximately 4.8 GWh for the year 2011. With regard to net demand savings, the combined overall target of the C&IC and CINC program components was 10.4 MW in 2011. Ref.: 5725 4 Commercial & Industrial Cust...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report discusses the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction (CINC) program's eligibility criteria, emphasizing cost-effective energy-saving measures. ENSC has authority to determine eligibility and screens for free-ridership before offering incentives, typically providing support only for measures beyond common practice.
to identify measures or design techniques which it considers “common practice” in its service territory. ENSC usually provides incentives only for measures which exceed the deemed common practice. Ref.: 5725 5 Commercial & Industrial Custo...
AI summary The document outlines the logic models for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction (C&IC) and Commercial & Industrial New Construction (CINC) programs, illustrating the causal links between program activities and expected market changes. ENSC typically provides incentives only for measures exceeding deemed common practice.
Figure 2: CINC Program Logic Model3 3 The numbers 1 through 12 contained in this logic model explain the relationship between the different levels involved. They are presented in Appendix II. Ref.: 5725 7 Commercial & Industrial Custom and...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used in the 2011 evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program. It includes the analysis of program documentation, interviews with program administrators, on-site visits, surveys, and interviews with participants and verification partners.
program manuals intended for internal use. More specifically for the C&IC program, the table below presents such typical program manual contents along with what was found in the C&IC program manual. Table 4: C&IC Program Manual Content Eva...
AI summary The document evaluates the content of the C&IC program manual, highlighting typical sections such as program description, objectives, eligibility criteria, and program partners. It notes that certain sections, such as total savings objectives and market studies, are either missing or partially included in the manual.
ocess flow chart Program forms Information included in the program manual Information partially included in the program manual No information The Evaluator analyzed the C&IC program manual and found that it contains relevant information us...
AI summary The Evaluator found that the C&IC program manual contains useful information but recommends adding details on M&V aspects and explaining the 'Custom Client Response Process' form. These improvements would enhance clarity and support program management and evaluation.
s multiple purposes such as determining project eligibility, establishing the level of incentive, estimating free-ridership levels, etc. This should be explained in the program manual. > Clarify the use of the terms “preliminary energy aud...
AI summary The text discusses the need for clarity in terminology related to energy audits and scoping studies, and the importance of documenting parameters used for estimating program objectives. It emphasizes avoiding confusion between terms and ensuring transparency in assumptions for future evaluations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report number, the document type (form 2, form 7, etc.) and the revision of the file. Many documents have the same name even though they do not pertain to the same project. This situation...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights inconsistencies in data entry within the DSMDS, such as misspelled project details and incorrect percentage installations. It recommends standardizing entries using drop-down lists to improve data accuracy and facilitate evaluation.
eld: When summing the percentage installed of each project for 2010 and 2011, the Evaluator noted that several projects appeared as if they had been more than 100% installed. > Split the customer name field in two columns: At the time of c...
AI summary The Evaluator identified issues with the tracking sheet used for energy efficiency programs, including incorrect project categorization under the customer name field and inaccurate energy savings calculations that did not account for line losses. Recommendations include splitting the customer name field and adding a new column to track consumer-level energy savings.
o consideration. To reduce the risk of such errors, the Evaluator recommends adding a new column in the project tracking sheet to show energy savings at the meter independent from the Ref.: 5725 16 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Co...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends adding a new column to the project tracking sheet to show energy savings at the meter independently from the energy savings at the generator, using Excel functions to calculate the savings at the generator level.
el function could automatically calculate the savings at the generator. Furthermore, the existing energy savings field should be clearly identified as being “at the generator level.” > Split the demand savings field in two different column...
AI summary The text discusses the need to split the demand savings field in the C&IC program tracking sheet into two separate columns for kW and kVA to avoid biases and errors in data entry. It highlights the importance of accurately capturing demand savings based on the customer's tariff rate and power factor. Additionally, it mentions improvements made to the C&IC program in 2011.
2011, the C&IC program was significantly upgraded with regard to several aspects. During the interview with the PM, the Evaluator noted the following key improvements from the 2010 program evaluation: > Program staffing has been improved t...
AI summary In 2011, the C&IC program was upgraded with improved staffing, a focus on larger projects with high demand savings potential, and the inclusion of sales lead activities. ENSC is advised to use a weighted average of line loss factors for projects involving multiple rate codes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Within the website material, there is a program overview chart that describes the different project phases along with the documents needed. Such a chart should help participants u...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights the importance of developing an evaluation plan in parallel with program design and development for the C&IC program. The report notes that the absence of such a plan limits the ability to rigorously evaluate the program's effectiveness and impact.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.4 Section of ENSC Website Commercial, institutional and industrial customers can easily consult the ENSC website to seek information on the programs offered. More specifically,...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the ENSC website's C&IC section, highlighting its usefulness for commercial, institutional, and industrial customers. It praises the comprehensive program materials and standardized forms but recommends expanding the 'Who Is Eligible' section to include industrial companies and large institutional customers.
ses. This section should also mention the large institutional customers as eligible customers since the C&IC program targets hospitals, universities and regional school boards as well. > Supplement the ENSC website with information taken f...
AI summary The text discusses improvements to the ENSC website, including adding information from Appendix H of the C&IC program manual for staff training and updating the title of the 'Nova Scotia Power On-Bill Financing' section to better include customers of independent municipal electric utilities.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.2.5 Interview with a Verification Partner Under the C&IC program the key role of the verification partner, who is an external consultant, is to help clients access the ENSC progra...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the C&IC program and highlights the verification partner's high satisfaction with the program's operations, participation process, and relationships with program staff. The verification partner suggests improving client awareness through enhanced marketing activities to overcome the main barrier to participation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3.2 Program Tracking Sheet Under the program process evaluation, Econoler reviewed the structure and contents of ENSC’s CINC program tracking sheet. All in all, the tracking sheet...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report reviewed ENSC’s CINC program tracking sheet, noting its usefulness for program monitoring and administration. While essential fields are present, improvements are recommended to enhance efficiency. The sheet includes project details, energy savings estimates, and financial incentive calculations under the NCCP path.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Standardize the entries and fix limitations: To avoid entering the same information in different ways, ENSC should integrate a drop-down list of answers when possible. This will f...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation recommends standardizing data entry practices to reduce errors and improve evaluation processes. It suggests using drop-down lists for fields like 'Path,' 'Status,' and 'Finish Month' to ensure consistency and alignment with program manuals.
s site selection based on location for field activities. Presenting the address information in three cells (street address, city and postal code) will greatly facilitate this process. Ref.: 5725 24 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Co...
AI summary The CINC program, launched in October 2010, has remained largely unchanged in its design and implementation. It has seen increasing project completion rates, with nine projects completed in 2011 and more than 21 planned for upcoming years. The program offers three distinct paths for project implementation, which affects the level of customization and management workload.
iency measures may be installed before the PDA is completed under the NCCP path. Therefore, the CINC project management workload on ENSC’s side is high due to the fact that each project is customized. When conducting the on-site visits, th...
AI summary The document highlights challenges in collecting necessary documentation for energy efficiency programs, particularly under the NCCP path. Participants, often building owners, lack awareness of construction details, and design-build firms do not automatically retain required records. This leads to difficulties in conducting M&V and complying with the CPG.
evaluating project delivery process efficiency, ENSC should establish performance indicators to monitor if such tasks are completed within the time frame predicted in the program theory. > Clearly define the CPG minimum requirements at the...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends that ENSC establish performance indicators to monitor project delivery efficiency and provide standardized minimum requirements for CINC projects early in the process. Additionally, the Evaluator suggests adding a commissioning component to the program to help achieve predicted energy savings.
ributes to achieving the savings predicted by the modeling. The CPG already includes an enhanced building commissioning component that could be used. 4.3.4 Section of ENSC Website Commercial, institutional and industrial customers can easi...
AI summary The document discusses improvements to the ENSC website's description of the CPG, noting that the CPG is a tool rather than a program. It also mentions that the CINC program is new, and the verification partner had limited experience with it during the evaluation.
cation partner who reviews energy model submissions and provides technical assistance to program participants did not have much experience with the program (three months) at the time of the interview. The level of satisfaction of the verif...
AI summary A verification partner expressed high satisfaction with the CINC program despite some initial challenges, including the need for developing guidelines and improving software tools. The partner highlighted the importance of collaboration with ENSC's team and suggested enhancements such as adding a commissioning component and calibrating modeling tools. Approximately 44% of respondents had previously participated in other NSPI or ENSC programs.
rom someone who previously participated in the program (11%), from the Dalhousie Eco Efficiency Centre (7%), from when NSPI ran the program (7%), from ENSC literature (4%) or from word of mouth (4%).
AI summary The text indicates that awareness of the program comes from various sources, including past participants, the Dalhousie Eco Efficiency Centre, NSPI's previous management, ENSC literature, and word of mouth.
Table 7: Source of Awareness of C&IC Program 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source (#) (#) (#) (%) Sample Size 11 13 13 27 Contractor/vendor 4 6 1 22% ENSC staff 2 1 22% ENSC presentation 1 3 2 19% Internet/ENSC website 8 1 19% Someone in program/wor...
AI summary Table 7 shows the sources of awareness of the C&IC Program from 2008 to 2011, with the Internet/ENSC website being a significant source in 2009 and 2010. The sample size increased over time, and various channels such as contractors, ENSC staff, and presentations contributed to awareness.
1 2011 questions included ‘Yes/No’ response categories and therefore allowed multiple mentions, while previous years were a single response question. Ref.: 5725 29 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program highlights that 66% of participants cited energy cost savings as a primary or secondary motivation, with 59% listing it as their primary reason. Program incentives and environmental concerns were also noted as motivators, though to a lesser extent. The report recommends maintaining a focus on financial benefits.
ts of the program since savings on energy cost and program incentives are still the main participant motivations. Table 8: Participant Motivations
AI summary The text discusses the primary motivations of program participants, highlighting energy cost savings and program incentives as the main drivers. A table is referenced, but its content is not detailed in the provided text.
2008 2009 2010 2011 Second Second Second Second Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Motivations Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Moti...
AI summary The text presents data on motivations for energy efficiency programs between 2008 and 2011, highlighting factors such as saving on energy costs, incentives, improving lighting conditions, and environmental protection. The data shows varying levels of importance and participation across the years.
4% project Reduce 1 1 maintenance costs Reduce carbon 2 footprint Ease of program 2 1 participation Other 11% Refused 4% Don’t know 1 1 2 2 7% Ref.: 5725 30 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The majority of participants in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program did not identify barriers to participation (74%). Among those who did, issues included long approval times, equipment not meeting payback requirements, and required measurement as barriers.
2008 2009 2010 2011 Second Second Second Second Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Barriers Barrier Barrier Barrier Barrier Barrier Barrier Barrier Barrie...
AI summary The document presents a table showing barriers to the implementation of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2008 to 2011, with data on sample sizes, the percentage of respondents who reported no barriers, and specific barriers such as approval time, payback timeframe, and communication issues.
7% Don’t know 4 3 1 4 26% These are not program-related barriers. Ref.: 5725 31 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.4.4 Energy Attitudes The vast majority...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program highlights that 93% of respondents believe reducing energy usage is important, and 100% believe managing energy costs is important. These findings are consistent with previous years.
1 1 4% Other 7% Ref.: 5725 32 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.4.6 Program Influence The incentives or on-bill financing are the most important factors...
AI summary The Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program's incentives and on-bill financing are the most significant factors influencing energy efficiency measure adoption, with funded preliminary energy audits and technical assistance also playing important roles.
actice of the industry (mean score of 4.6) and the existing energy efficiency code (mean score of 4.1) are deemed less important. Table 12: Program Influence Importance of Program in Influencing Decision to Implement Energy Efficiency Meas...
AI summary The table highlights the importance of various factors in influencing the decision to implement energy efficiency measures, with program financial incentives and on-bill financing being the most important (mean score of 8.4). The existing energy efficiency code is considered less important (mean score of 4.1).
4.6 Existing energy efficiency code 4.1 Note: Don’t know responses removed from data. Ref.: 5725 33 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.4.7 Satisfaction wi...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program shows that all respondents are satisfied with the program overall. Satisfaction levels are high for various aspects, including program staff availability, rebate amounts, and communication. However, verification received the lowest satisfaction score at 53%.
SPI to ENSC. Noteworthy is that in 2011, verification received the lowest score of satisfaction with only 53 percent. Table 13: Participant Satisfaction with Program
AI summary The document mentions SPI to ENSC and highlights that verification received the lowest satisfaction score in 2011 with only 53 percent. A table titled 'Participant Satisfaction with Program' is referenced, but no further details are provided.
10 9 12 8 27 76% Paperwork and procedures required to 27 70% receive rebate or incentives Verification 7 6 9 7 12 9 27 53% Those giving a rating of 5 or 4 on a scale where rating: 5= ‘very satisfied’ and 1 = ‘not at all satisfied’ Note: Do...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights participant feedback on the C&IC program, with many suggesting improvements such as increasing staffing, enhancing technical knowledge, improving marketing, and offering electronic forms. Some participants also recommended expanding the program's scope to include other energy types beyond electricity.
of forecast energy savings of the two C&I Custom programs (C&IC and CINC) accounted for approximately 30 percent of the total expected savings to be generated by all ENSC programs for the same period. This section presents the work complet...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the impact of the C&IC and CINC programs in 2011, including on-site visits and calculations of energy and peak demand savings. The evaluation involved determining adjustment factors and net-to-gross ratios to estimate overall savings.
or the energy and demand savings calculations. Considering the respective size of each program component, the Evaluator made 23 on-site visits to C&IC projects and two on-site visits to CINC projects. The sampling methodologies applied to...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted 23 on-site visits to C&IC projects and two to CINC projects to assess energy and demand savings. Different sampling methodologies were used for C&IC and CINC programs due to project-specific differences and data collection requirements. The report outlines sampling methods, on-site protocols, and in-depth interviews for evaluating program effects.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report projects for which savings had already been verified and adjusted through measurement and verification (M&V). On the other hand, this list also included projects which were only at...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the selection of 40 energy efficiency projects for on-site visits, focusing on those with verified savings through the C&IC program, including projects completed in 2011 and those partially completed in 2012.
dditional details on savings claim status along with a breakdown of energy and peak demand savings at the generator for the 40 completed projects used for on-site visit sampling (as of October 2011). Table 16: Claimed Savings at the Genera...
AI summary This section provides details on the status of savings claims for 40 completed projects, including energy and peak demand savings tracked at the generator as of October 2011. It outlines the sampling criteria used to select 23 sites for on-site visits, prioritizing factors such as project size, source of savings claims, type of project, participant sector, and location.
lation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, electrical motors and VSDs, etc.; > participant’s market sector (commercial, municipal or industrial sector); and > project location. Ref.: 5725 37 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construc...
AI summary The document discusses the sampling criteria used to select 23 projects for evaluation under the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program (C&IC) in 2011, comparing them to the total population of 159 projects. It also references the detailed sampling plan in Appendix IX.
on-site visits were planned for measuring and verifying the energy savings of the implemented measures. At the time of planning the on-site visits, the status of each CINC project was as shown below.
AI summary On-site visits were planned to measure and verify energy savings from implemented measures, with the status of each CINC project shown at the time of planning.
NCCP: New Construction Core Performance path, NCWB: New Construction Whole Building b This project is the least likely to be completed in 2011 among all CINC projects under construction in 2011. Ref.: 5725 38 Commercial & Industrial Custom...
AI summary The document discusses the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on a 2011 evaluation report and the selection criteria for site visits.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 5.1.3 On-Site Visit Protocols – C&IC and CINC Programs A tailored on-site visit protocol was developed for each C&IC program, in accordance with its respective program specifics and...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation developed tailored on-site visit protocols for the C&IC and CINC programs. These protocols involved interviews with technical staff and walk-through audits of installed equipment to gather key information for impact evaluation.
report, ENSC tracking sheet or PDA). In addition, this document defined the facility operation schedules, which included daily time of use (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) and the number of operating hours per day. During the site visits, the Evaluator...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for on-site visits to evaluate compliance with energy efficiency programs. It describes the use of ENSC tracking sheets, M&V reporting files, and tailored questionnaires based on CPG criteria to validate technical information and ensure adherence to program requirements.
interviews with C&IC program participants and another with one CINC program participant). The five program participants that the Evaluator met for in-depth interviews were selected on a random basis. The in-depth interview outcomes were us...
AI summary The document discusses an evaluation of the C&IC and CINC programs, including in-depth interviews with participants to assess internal spillover, participant experience, and program improvements. Gross savings were estimated using data from program tracking sheets, on-site visits, and savings reviews, with analyses varying by program component and energy efficiency measures.
ed in accordance with project specificities, such as the program component in which the customer participated (C&IC or CINC), or the type of energy efficiency measures implemented through the project. The Evaluator conducted the 25 on-site...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted on-site visits to assess energy savings from efficiency measures, calculating adjustment ratios to refine program savings estimates. Lighting retrofits were the primary source of energy savings in the C&IC program, contributing to 70% of the projected savings in 2011.
their global energy savings approach. Projects that involved building lighting retrofits only accounted for almost 70 percent of the overall projected savings of the C&IC population for the year 2011. In accordance with the large proportio...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from building lighting retrofit projects in 2011, emphasizing the importance of verifying unitary wattage and ballast factors to ensure accurate savings estimates.
te of the nameplate of spare ballasts) during on-site visits. When not written on the nameplate, the ballast factor could be found on the Internet through the manufacturer website. Installation Rate When possible, the Evaluator conducted a...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted inspections of lighting fixtures to ensure accurate energy savings calculations. A census was performed when feasible, while samples were used for large facilities. Discrepancies between reports and actual counts prompted further audits to improve accuracy.
vings of the project. In comparison, additional fixture inspections were not required when the Evaluator found no (or very few) discrepancies between its fixture count and ENSC’s. Hours of Operation To evaluate the hours of operation, the...
AI summary The document outlines the evaluation process for energy efficiency programs, focusing on fixture inspections, hours of operation, occupancy sensors, and interactive effects with heating and cooling systems. The Evaluator confirmed data with program participants and considered special circumstances affecting energy savings calculations.
al circumstances, for instance, related to the space condition set points (dry bulb temperature and relative humidity) to be maintained or related to the annual operation schedules. Diversity Factor During the on-site visits, the Evaluator...
AI summary The document discusses the assessment of lighting systems and their impact on energy efficiency, including the use of diversity factors for calculating peak demand savings. It also references the evaluation of municipal projects under the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program in 2011.
eet lighting systems are steadily in operation year round, their electricity demand (in kW) is constant. The Evaluator thus set the diversity factor to 100 percent. 5.2.3 C&IC – Motors and Drives There was only one project of the 2011 samp...
AI summary The evaluation of a 2011 project involving variable-speed drives (VSDs) and motor retrofits found that the M&V approach used by the consultant was questionable. The Evaluator recommended a more thorough method, such as IPMVP Options B or C, involving power monitoring over a minimum period of two weeks.
um period (2 weeks). IPMVP Options B or C would therefore be appropriate. However, the consultant only made spot measurements with a power clamp meter to evaluate energy savings from VSD installation Ref.: 5725 44 Commercial & Industrial C...
AI summary The evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program found that the consultant's method of assessing energy savings using IPMVP Option A was not appropriate. Spot measurements with a power clamp meter were used instead of more accurate methods like IPMVP Options B or C. An on-site visit was conducted to verify installations and collect equipment data.
nd operation schedules were discussed with the program participants. Finally, the Evaluator reviewed with the program participants the assumptions and calculations made in the consultant’s M&V report. The interactive effects on space heati...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency projects, including the assessment of space heating and cooling systems and the on-site review of a refrigeration project. Econoler noted that certain rooms were not heated or cooled, and a conservative approach was taken in calculating demand savings. The refrigeration project involved replacing expansion valves and was classified as a process refrigeration project.
onfirmed that these three chillers were not used for purposes (such as space cooling) other than the manufacturing process. This project was therefore considered to be a process refrigeration project. For project impact evaluation, Econole...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of a refrigeration project involving chillers used in a manufacturing process. It outlines the steps taken to assess the project's impact, including on-site verification of equipment installation and efficiency calculations based on manufacturer testing and consultant input.
e time have the appropriate measurement tools on hand, i.e., power data loggers. However, ENSC committed to conducting more sound measurement activities for this project by the end of 2011 or in 2012. For this project, the Evaluator had li...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted an on-site assessment of UPS systems installed as part of an energy efficiency project. They validated correct installation, reviewed feasibility study data, and used spot measurements to estimate energy consumption. The diversity factor was assumed to be high due to continuous operation of critical units, and no significant impact on heating and cooling systems was observed.
the UPS systems are located in mechanical rooms where the temperature control scheme allows wide margins of air temperatures. The Evaluator thus estimated that the interactive effects of the energy Ref.: 5725 46 Commercial & Industrial Cus...
AI summary The evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program (CINC) under the New Construction Core Performance Path is discussed. Two new construction buildings were assessed in 2011 under the NCCP path, with the Evaluator confirming compliance with CPG requirements and identifying key queries for on-site verification.
l the received documents and evaluating the actual compliance of the projects with CPG requirements. The Evaluator also collected any new documentation from either ENSC or sample program participants. For calculating the verified project i...
AI summary The evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program found that participants had low understanding of CPG compliance requirements. Due to missing documentation and uncertainties, the evaluator decided not to adjust the energy savings calculated by ENSC for 2011 and provided recommendations for improvement.
matically require third-party M&V from those for which it would be optional. The Evaluator believes that third-party M&V could be done either by ENSC or by an independent consultant. > Build the capacity of ENSC on M&V and IPMVP requiremen...
AI summary The Evaluator notes that third-party M&V is not consistently applied in ENSC projects, with many projects lacking proper M&V plans and reports that comply with IPMVP standards. Discrepancies in measurement methods, such as using spot measurements instead of run-time measurements, have led to inaccuracies in savings calculations.
VP.10 For the lighting retrofit 10 In the IPMVP, the “key parameter” is the parameter whose performance defines the energy savings due to the implementation of the energy conservation measure. Ref.: 5725 51 Commercial & Industrial Custom a...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of measuring pre- and post-retrofit wattage of lighting fixtures as the key parameter for energy savings under the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program. It recommends training on M&V and the IPMVP for program staff.
sured was the pre- and post-retrofit wattage of the lighting fixtures. With this in mind, the Evaluator encourages ENSC to organize trainings on M&V and the IPMVP for C&IC program staff. > Record the diversity factors used for peak demand...
AI summary The text discusses issues with diversity factors used in peak demand savings calculations for the C&IC program, highlighting that ENSC used conservative factors that did not reflect actual conditions. It recommends training on M&V and IPMVP, and recording diversity factors and their rationale for future evaluations.
limate zones that have been used for building load simulations, namely the Greenwood and Shearwater airports) as well as the building market sector (office, retail and warehouse). Using Ref.: 5725 52 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New...
AI summary The text discusses the use of climate zones, specifically Greenwood and Shearwater airports, and building market sectors (office, retail, and warehouse) for building load simulations to improve energy savings calculations in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program.
a CINC program participant did not show any relevant sign of internal spillover, the Evaluator decided to consider CINC program internal spillover as negligible. Evaluation of C&IC Program Spillover For the year 2011, the Evaluator assesse...
AI summary The evaluation of the C&IC Program's internal spillover in 2011 found negligible effects based on a telephone survey and interviews. Participants were asked about energy efficiency measures they decided not to implement through the program and whether they implemented them elsewhere.
s 15 As previously mentioned, one in-depth interview was also carried out with a CINC program participant. This interview did not reveal significant internal spillover effects for this program. Ref.: 5725 57 Commercial & Industrial Custom...
AI summary An interview with a CINC program participant did not reveal significant internal spillover effects. The evaluation report compares tracked and evaluated savings for the C&IC and CINC programs in 2011, showing slight differences in energy and demand savings.
vings Tracked Savings from ENSC 3.949 MW 0.90 3.554 MW Evaluation Results 4.047 MW 0.93 3.764 MW As per the last table, the evaluated net energy savings of the C&IC and CINC programs are higher than those tracked by ENSC by approximately 1...
AI summary The evaluated net energy savings from the C&IC and CINC programs are slightly higher than those tracked by ENSC, primarily due to improvements in the free-ridership level. Adjustments were made to some C&IC projects based on sample project evaluations, while CINC program savings were not adjusted due to data gaps and inaccuracies in assessing NCCP and NCWB projects.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, detailing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives undertaken during that period.
Program 5. Complete the program manual to keep track of changes and standardize Manual the content: The program manual is well written, but the information is not Content comprehensive enough to serve as “program memory” in case of modific...
AI summary The program manual needs to be completed and standardized to ensure comprehensive tracking of program changes and improve consistency. A standardized nomenclature for electronic files is also recommended to avoid confusion. Standardized entries in program forms are necessary to reduce data entry errors and improve data evaluation.
seful. – “Project Details” field: Inconsistencies were found in this column, such as “Lighting Retrofit” and “Lighitng Retrofit.” Moreover, a number of projects were defined as “Lighting/HVAC” while others were identified as “HVAC/Lighting...
AI summary The document highlights inconsistencies in project details and data fields within a tracking sheet evaluation. Issues include misspelled project types, incorrect percentage installation values, and the need to split the 'Customer Name' field into two columns to improve data accuracy and clarity.
ram participant. The addition of this new “Project Name” column along with the standardization of “Customer Name” column entries would help address this issue. Ref.: 5725 60 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Effic...
AI summary The document discusses the addition of a new 'Project Name' column and the standardization of the 'Customer Name' column to improve clarity and address issues in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program evaluation report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, assessing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives.
t 1. However, when implementing the measure significantly improves the equipment power factor, the kVA and kW figures may be very different. For instance, the feasibility study of an uninterruptible power supply replacement project estimat...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of splitting installed demand savings into kW and kVA columns to avoid errors and improve accuracy, as well as the use of weighted average line loss factors for projects with multiple rate codes. These recommendations aim to enhance data consistency and clarity in energy efficiency evaluations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of its programs and performance during that year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of its performance and initiatives during that year.
outreach activities. Participant 18. .Focus on the financial benefits of the program: ENSC should continue to Perspectives focus on the financial benefits of the program since savings on energy cost and program incentives are still the mai...
AI summary The document emphasizes the importance of focusing on the financial benefits of the energy efficiency program to motivate participants, as well as the continued use of contractors and design professionals to promote the program, given their significant role in specifying implemented measures.
m Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which likely outlines the performance, achievements, and challenges of the organization in delivering energy efficiency programs during that year.
e for the C&IC program but are not simple to extract from the M&V results. In addition, giving the sole responsibility of M&V to the firm that also implements the project may be risky. For instance, the M&V of the largest project of the 20...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights concerns about the reliability of measurement and verification (M&V) results when conducted by the same firm implementing energy efficiency projects, especially for large projects. It recommends third-party M&V for projects with energy savings above 500 MWh/year to reduce bias and improve accuracy.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, which likely outlines the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives conducted during that year.
Impact 22. Build the capacity of ENSC on M&V and IPMVP requirements: As per the Evaluation program manual, all C&IC projects must have an M&V plan compliant with the IPMVP (Section 5.7 of the program manual). This would also mean that all...
AI summary The evaluation highlights a lack of compliance with M&V and IPMVP requirements in C&IC projects, noting missing M&V plans and improper measurement methods. The Evaluator recommends training for ENSC staff on M&V and IPMVP to improve accuracy and adherence to standards.
ator encourages ENSC to organize trainings on M&V and the IPMVP for C&IC program staff. 23. Record the diversity factors used for peak demand savings calculations: When analyzing the C&IC savings per project, Econoler realized that the div...
AI summary Econoler advises ENSC to improve the accuracy of peak demand savings calculations by recording diversity factors for each project and their rationale. The current approach uses overly conservative diversity factors, such as 70% for a 24/7 facility, which should be closer to 100% for accurate assessments.
ons of this program’s impacts. 17 In the IPMVP, the “key parameter” is the parameter whose performance defines the energy savings due to the implementation of the energy conservation measure. Ref.: 5725 65 Commercial & Industrial Custom an...
AI summary The document discusses the 'key parameter' concept in the IPMVP, which defines energy savings from energy conservation measures. It references an evaluation report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
easibility Study Incentive – Whole Building & Custom Paths), the Evaluator recommends always using the same terminology to designate a product or activity. In this case, the program manual uses alternatively the terms energy audit and feas...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends standardizing terminology in the program manual to avoid confusion and suggests providing a printable version of Appendix H (CPG) to program participants for easier reference.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of their energy efficiency initiatives and programs.
evelop their project under a custom approach. Consequently, the Evaluator recommends adding a column in the tracking sheet to follow these peak demand savings. Ref.: 5725 67 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Effic...
AI summary The Evaluator suggests adding a column to the tracking sheet to monitor peak demand savings under the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in the 2011 Evaluation Report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of its performance and operations during that year.
Program 9. Track the market type of each customer: The PM should consider adding the Tracking Sheet market sector of each customer (e.g. “Commercial,” “Industrial,” “Institutional,” etc.) for tracking purposes. This additional information...
AI summary The text outlines several recommendations for improving program tracking and implementation, including tracking customer market sectors, adding contact details, breaking down address information, and adjusting eligibility criteria to accommodate projects that partially comply with the CPG due to corporate requirements.
construction project. This new building was to be used for retailing luxury cars of a brand that had its specific and non- negotiable standards for indoor lighting level and technology. The former program participant told the Evaluator tha...
AI summary A program participant decided not to apply for the CINC program due to inability to meet lighting power density requirements. The Evaluator recommends developing a methodology to allow partial compliance with CPG for new constructions and adjusting incentives accordingly, while ensuring compliance with a minimum number of Core Performance Requirements.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of its programs and activities during that year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, providing an assessment of the organization's performance and programs during that year.
sector (office, retail and warehouse). Using such indices should lead to energy savings calculations per project that are closer to actual project savings. Ref.: 5725 70 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficienc...
AI summary The text discusses the use of energy indices in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program to improve the accuracy of energy savings calculations for projects in sectors like office, retail, and warehouse.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, which likely outlines the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken during that period.
Impact 22. Review the simulation made for the warehouse typical building: Through Evaluation the impact evaluation process, ENSC submitted the spreadsheet “1 Measure Level Outputs – All Buildings.xlsx,” which showed the key results from th...
AI summary The evaluation of the warehouse building simulations revealed an anomaly where applying the CPG increased energy consumption compared to the MNECB-1997. This discrepancy is attributed to the higher lighting power density in the CPG and potential overestimation of cross effects on heating systems.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011. It likely outlines the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken during that year.
nd of the year, the PDA savings figures would also be a better estimate of the actual project impacts than any general savings value per area unit. 20 On page 11 of the CPG, the text refers to savings from 25 percent to 35 percent over bey...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on energy savings estimates and performance indicators related to building efficiency.
APPENDIX II – PROGRAM THEORY Commercial & Industrial New Construction (CINC) Services # Program Theory Performance Indicators 1 In order to publicize the program and The marketing activities are numerous in this enhance participation, seve...
AI summary The CINC program uses various marketing activities to promote energy efficiency in commercial and industrial new construction. Performance indicators include tracking activities, attendance, and evaluations to assess the effectiveness of these efforts and improve future events.
the source of awareness in order to establish which ones were the most effective. 2 The program offers three types of technical Selecting the right path will be captured in assistance: modeling validation by an each project file. As for ed...
AI summary The program provides technical assistance and incentives for energy efficiency measures. It includes modeling validation, educational activities, and incentives based on the chosen path. Tracking of activities and incentives is emphasized to evaluate effectiveness and measure savings.
epending on the path chosen. date of payment. This ratio will establish the level of distortion of forecasted savings. Ref.: 5725 73 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evalua...
AI summary The document discusses the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, highlighting three paths available to participants based on building type and size. It emphasizes the importance of tracking program performance indicators to determine the popularity of different paths for future development.
Performance (NCCP) path, the NCWB unpopular paths for future program approach or the prescriptive rebate developments. approach. 5 The Program Manager will support If the Program Manager or any program staff customers selecting the right p...
AI summary The text outlines program management procedures for energy efficiency initiatives, emphasizing customer support, feasibility studies, and tracking program participation. It discusses the roles of the Program Manager, the requirement for feasibility studies under the NCWB approach, and the integration of projects into the BER program.
2011 Evaluation Report Commercial & Industrial New Construction (CINC) Services # Program Theory Performance Indicators 11 Depending on the path selected, savings Track savings generated from each project are expected to be anywhere from 2...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the Commercial & Industrial New Construction (CINC) Services program, focusing on performance indicators such as energy savings compared to the MNECB 1997. It highlights the importance of tracking savings and adjusting baselines, particularly in renovation projects, though this process may be costly.
ensive as it would require a full "market" study specific to Nova Scotia builders. 12 The long-term outcome of this program is to This is a long-term indicator that cannot be convince engineers, architects, building tracked over a short pe...
AI summary The document discusses the long-term goals of the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, emphasizing the need for a market study specific to Nova Scotia builders. It also highlights a shift in energy costs, with less than half of respondents reporting energy costs as less than 10% of their annual operating budget.
ed to always use the same term in all the program literature. C: Point 3, is a very good recommendation due to frequent modification in the program content, even though the form has a version number. Q: You do not approve the proposal of a...
AI summary The text discusses feedback on program forms and eligibility criteria, including concerns about clarity, version control, and the approval process for energy audits. It also raises questions about the evaluation of projects and the use of standard market practices for determining savings and equipment replacement.
pment still functioning: If there is a level of standard practice, do you calculate savings based on the early replacement principle (a stair approach)? Page 4 6.2 Q: Are all the projects measured? Q: Who decides what protocol to use in ea...
AI summary The text includes questions and comments regarding program protocols, eligibility for financing, and the structure of the program manual. Concerns are raised about the complexity of the manual, the number of forms, and the eligibility of municipality clients for on-bill financing.
it for participants or non-participants or both? Q: Do you do cost effectiveness test post evaluation? Q: When the program was initially designed, was there an evaluation plan designed concurrently? Q: How would you rate the facility or di...
AI summary The document contains a questionnaire for ENSC energy efficiency program partners, focusing on their role, experience, and evaluation of the program. It includes questions about cost effectiveness, evaluation plans, and ease of use of a centralized database.
stions Please indicate your company name: Q1 - How would you define your role as an ENSC energy efficiency program partner? Q1a – How long have you had that role (specify months or years)? Q2 - On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions directed at program partners of the Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program. It asks about their role, relationship with ENSC, participation process, complaints received, and overall satisfaction with the program.
t), how would you rate your satisfaction in regard to the overall program? Q5a- If your answer to Q5 was equal to or less than 8, would you care to share the reason or reasons for such a score? Ref.: 5725 90 Commercial & Industrial Custom...
AI summary The text includes survey questions from an evaluation report on the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It asks participants about their satisfaction with the program, reasons for low satisfaction scores, suggestions for improvement, and involvement in program components such as feasibility studies and site inspections.
that use the Whole Building Path Participant in the kick-off meeting with ENSC and the client Site inspections Measurement & Verification (M&V) Design assistance, if needed Other Ref.: 5725 91 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Constru...
AI summary The text outlines various stages and processes involved in a commercial and industrial energy efficiency program, including kick-off meetings, site inspections, measurement and verification, and design assistance. It also includes a series of questions regarding program verification, commissioning, and relationships with stakeholders such as clients, consultants, and contractors.
tion report) and we hope that they will contribute to improving program performance. If we need to clarify some of your answers, we might call you back. Your name Date Phone number E-mail Ref.: 5725 95 Commercial & Industrial Custom and Ne...
AI summary This document is a process evaluation questionnaire for the Custom Program (Existing Commercial and Industrial) under the ENSC Energy Efficiency Program. It asks participants to provide feedback on their role, relationship with the Program Administrator and Project Coordinator, and other general questions.
ou characterize your relationship with the ENSC Program Administrator and/or the Project Coordinator? Program Administrator Score: Not applicable Project Coordinator Score: Not applicable Ref.: 5725 96 Commercial & Industrial Custom and Ne...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about participant satisfaction, complaints, and suggestions for improvement. The report indicates that some participants had complaints, and there are opportunities for program enhancement.
2011 Evaluation Report Q6 – Do you have any suggestion to improve the program? No Yes Q6a- If you answered Yes, please explain the nature of the improvement(s): Q7 – On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satis...
AI summary The text presents a series of evaluation questions related to a program, including inquiries about program improvements, satisfaction with marketing efforts, and the involvement of consultants in various program components such as energy audits and measurement and verification. It also includes references to the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
involved? 0a Q12- Is your involvement in projects of each participant mandatory? Yes No Some Q12a- If you answered Some, please explain on what basis your involvement is required. Q13- As an outside Consultant, do you discuss or consult wi...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions regarding involvement in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, including the number of parties involved, mandatory participation, and potential confusion in the market about roles of program parties and other organizations.
r questions). In addition, this questionnaire should help shed light on the participant’s satisfaction in the program process and outcomes. Questions on other Potential Energy Efficiency Initiatives A1. Why did your company or organization...
AI summary The document contains a questionnaire aimed at gathering feedback from participants in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program regarding their reasons for participation, implementation of energy efficiency measures, and financial support received.
all measures. A5. (If yes to A4) Do you have any financial support for implementing the measures you mentioned in the previous question? If yes, could you name the program(s)? Ref.: 5725 104 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construct...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, asking about financial support, influence on decision-making, and overall satisfaction with the program.
2011 Evaluation Report Satisfaction Questions B1. In general, how was your company or organization’s experience with the Custom Program? Please develop. B2. More precisely, could you comment the following aspects of the program support off...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses participant experiences with the Custom Program, focusing on satisfaction, program support, challenges, and barriers faced in implementing energy efficiency measures. It includes questions about communication, rebate amounts, and paperwork procedures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report B4. More specifically, what are the positive and/or negative comments you have for the way each project phase has been conducted (please comment only the project phases undertaken w...
AI summary The document requests feedback on the conduct of specific project phases supported by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) under the Custom Program, including Project Discovery, Scoping Study, Feasibility Study, and others. It also lists typical significant barriers for reference purposes.
_ List of typical significant barriers, for reference purposes only: 1. (concern that actual bill savings would be less than estimated) 2. (lack of information to make an informed decision) 3. (rebate/incentive was too little) 4. (paperwor...
AI summary The document lists common barriers to program participation, including concerns about bill savings, lack of information, and paperwork challenges. It also references an evaluation report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011 and asks for suggestions to improve the program.
stom Program? Consider all aspects and phases of the program previously mentioned. B6. Anything else to add (or additional notes)? Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. Ref.: 5725 108 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Con...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes a participant survey questionnaire and mentions the transition of program sponsorship from Nova Scotia Power to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
e for you? You may know Nova Scotia Power as the sponsor of this program. However, since 2011 the program is now sponsored by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Verification and Recall [V series] V1. The Custom program helps businesses im...
AI summary The text discusses the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program sponsored by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, and includes verification questions for participants from 2011. It outlines program details, such as technical assistance and financial incentives, and asks about company participation and knowledge.
erson in your company or organization who is most knowledgeable about your experience with the Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Custom Program? 1. Yes (if YES go to P1) 2. No V4. We would like to talk to the person who is the most knowledgeable ab...
AI summary The text outlines procedures for identifying the most knowledgeable person in an organization regarding the Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Custom Program and includes a reference to a 2011 evaluation report on the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report P3. (REPEAT FOR EACH PROGRAM IDENTIFIED IN P2) In what year did your company or organization participate in [Program x]? ACCEPT MULTIPLE YEARS 1. Before 2000 2. 2000 3. 2001 4. 2002...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report asks participants about their involvement in the Custom Program, including the year they participated, how they learned about the program, and the primary reason for their participation. The focus is on gathering data about program engagement and motivations.
3. (to save on energy costs/bills) 4. (to reduce maintenance costs) 5. (to improve existing lighting conditions) 6. (to find ways to reduce carbon footprint) Ref.: 5725 111 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program Effici...
AI summary The document outlines participant motivations for joining the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, including saving on energy costs, reducing maintenance costs, improving lighting, and reducing carbon footprint. It also asks about the second most important reason for participation and who was responsible for specifying measures during the project design phase.
2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) [READ FIRST TIME THROUGH ONLY] Now I would like to ask you to consider what actions you would have taken in the absence of the Custom Program. If your company or organization had not participated in the...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to consider what actions they would have taken in the absence of the Custom Program, focusing on energy efficiency measures. It includes response options and instructions for administering the survey.
ame energy efficiency measures that you implemented through the program, but at a later date? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused IF FR2c > 5, then ask: FR2cc. DO NOT POSE FR2cc IF DON’T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your re...
AI summary The text outlines a survey question regarding the likelihood of implementing energy efficiency measures at a later date if a program had not been available, followed by a series of response options. It also references an evaluation report for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report FR3. As part of its Custom Program, Efficiency Nova Scotia offers financial incentives and on-bill financing to help the implementation of energy-saving projects. If your company or...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom Program provides financial incentives and on-bill financing for energy-saving projects. Respondents are asked whether they would have paid for these projects without the program and to rate the importance of the program's incentives in their decision to implement energy efficiency measures.
at you decided not to implement through the program? 1. (Yes) 2. (No) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) [IF SO1 = 2 OR 98 OR 99, GO TO S Series] SO2. [ASK IF SO1=1] Which of the following energy efficiency measures were recommended in your fe...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process to determine which energy efficiency measures were recommended in a feasibility study but not implemented, and the reasons for non-implementation. It includes response options for both the selection of measures and the reasons for not implementing them.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SATISFACTION [S series] S1. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all satisfied’ and 5=‘very satisfied’, how was your company or organization’s experience with each of the following...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report asks participants to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the Custom Program and identify any barriers they faced in implementing energy efficiency measures. It includes both quantitative ratings and qualitative feedback on program experiences.
2. No (SKIP TO B4) 98. (Don’t know) (SKIP TO B4) 99. (Refused) (SKIP TO B4) B2. What was the SINGLE most important barrier? (DO NOT READ - ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE) 1. (concern that actual bill savings would be less than estimated) 2. (lack of...
AI summary The document presents a list of barriers to participation in the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program, with respondents identifying concerns such as insufficient savings, lack of information, and lengthy approval processes as key obstacles. The evaluation report is from 2011 and relates to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
ere 1= ‘not at all important’ and 5 = ‘very important’, how important is reducing energy usage to your company or organization? [98 = Don’t know, 99 = Refused] do not accept a range B5. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1= ‘not at all important’...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs for companies, as well as inquiries about the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs and suggestions for improving the Custom Program. It also asks if a visual guide would have helped with program participation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report F3. Approximately how many full-time equivalent workers DOES YOUR COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION employ at all locations within Nova Scotia? 1. Fewer than 5 2. 5 to 9 3. 10 to 19 4. 20 to...
AI summary The document includes a questionnaire about employment and organizational structure, followed by a reference to an appendix containing on-site visit protocols for the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program.
2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX VIII – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOLS The on-site visit protocols for the C&IC and CINC programs are attached in PDF format to this report. Ref.: 5725 122 Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report outlines the sampling plan for the C&IC program, emphasizing the importance of project size in selecting a representative sample. Larger projects, which have a greater impact on overall energy savings, are prioritized in the sampling process.
out of the 146 projects of 2011. After having applied the project size criterion, the Evaluator looked at the source of claimed energy and demand savings to guide project selection in stratum 1 to 3. In the list of 40 projects, only two pr...
AI summary In the 2011 evaluation report, 40 projects were analyzed under the Commercial & Industrial Custom and New Construction Program. Projects using M&V for savings verification were prioritized over those relying on PDA. The program includes a wide range of energy efficiency measures, which introduces challenges in impact evaluation due to varying verification efforts.
s reliably as possible in the sample. Pursuant to this objective, the 40 claimed projects were divided into five categories according to the type of measures implemented, as shown in the next table. Table 30: Breakdown of C&IC Projects by...
AI summary The 40 claimed C&IC projects were categorized into five types based on the measures implemented. The breakdown shows that lighting retrofit only projects accounted for the largest share of both energy and demand savings, followed by LED street lighting and lighting retrofit and other projects.
a The “Various” category of energy efficiency measures includes the following types of projects: HVAC improvements, uninterruptible power supply (UPS) upgrades and projects described as “Various.” After having automatically selected the fi...
AI summary The document discusses the distribution of energy efficiency measures, highlighting overrepresentation of certain categories like 'Street Lighting' and 'Lighting Retrofit and Other' and underrepresentation of 'Lighting Retrofit Only' and 'Various' in project selection. It also addresses the influence of market sectors (commercial, industrial, municipal) on project feasibility and sampling.
e likelihood that you would have implemented exactly the same energy efficient measures that you FR2a = Answer x 10% installed through the program? (Scale 0 to 10) FR2b. In the absence of the program, what is the likelihood that you would...
AI summary The text outlines a method for evaluating the impact of an energy efficiency program by assessing the likelihood of implementing energy-efficient measures without the program, the influence of program factors, and the financial impact of rebates on project costs.
= Program factors FR4_NP = SUM(f; g) Factors f and g = Non Program factors 100% - PA3 Score: [FR4_P/(FR4_P+FR4_NP)] FR2c. In the absence of the program, what is the likelihood that you would IF FR2c > 5 : ASK FR2cc have implemented exactly...
AI summary This text outlines a program evaluation framework that assesses the likelihood of implementing energy efficiency measures without the program, using a scoring system based on time delays and their impact on the program's effectiveness.
IF 7. : FR2cc = 0% 9. (Don’t know / Refused) IF 9. : FR2cc = 0% PA4 Score: FR2cc MEAN VALUE OF : Final Free-Ridership (PA1 ; PA2 ; PA3 ; PA4) Ref.: 5725 128 160, rue Saint-Paul, bureau 200, Québec (Québec), Canada G1K 3W1 Tél. : +1 (418) 6...
AI summary This document outlines the On-Site Visit Protocol for the C&I Custom Retrofit Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes general information such as site visit date, project details, contact information, and a list of people met during the visit, along with the type of building.
day Schedule 2 Time of use (specified Hours per above) day Schedule 3 Time of use (specified Hours per above) day ENSC_C&IC_On‐Site Visits Protocol 111024.xlsx 2012‐02‐15 1 of 4 C&I Custom Retrofit Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporatio...
AI summary This document outlines the on-site visit protocol for the C&I Custom Retrofit Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes sections for describing building heating and cooling systems, as well as verified energy and demand savings from monitoring and verification (M&V).
oints (occ./ unocc. temp., % hum) 4. Verified Energy Savings from M&V M&V Energy Savings (kWh/year) M&V Demand Savings (kW/year) 5. Additional Notes ENSC_C&IC_On‐Site Visits Protocol 111024.xlsx 2012‐02‐15 2 of 4 C&I Custom Retrofit Progra...
AI summary The document outlines a protocol for on-site visits under the C&I Custom Retrofit Program, focusing on lighting system assessments and energy savings verification through M&V (Monitoring and Verification). It includes tables for recording energy and demand savings and instructions for identifying emergency lighting systems.
ystem Assessment Fill the next table with proper information on the baseline/new lighting systems installed. Use additional sheets if required. Identify emergency lights as separated lighting systems. Nb. of Lighting Baseline / Nb. of Watt...
AI summary The text provides a table template for assessing lighting systems, including baseline and new systems, with columns for lamp type, number of fixtures, wattage, operating hours, control type, and other factors. The table is to be filled with specific information about installed lighting systems, including emergency lights as separate systems.
a‐ Lamp Type List: d‐ Control Type ‐ Choose 1 or b‐ Schedule List e‐ Heating System a CFL ‐ Hard‐wired m Metal Halide ‐ Pulse Start Fixture more between: b CFL ‐ Screw‐in n Metal Halide ‐ Reduced –Wattage Lamp Schedule 1 Dimmers Heating sy...
AI summary The text provides a list of lamp types, control types, schedules, and heating systems relevant to energy efficiency programs. It includes options for lighting technologies and control mechanisms, which may be used in energy efficiency initiatives or rebate programs.
c‐ Type of Ballast g LED Strip Lights s T8 Std Energy Savings Fixture Other (specify) f‐ Cooling Systems h LED Street lights/parking lights t T8 Super T8 E‐Electronic i LED Traffic/pedestrian signals u M‐Electromagnetic Cooling System 1 j...
AI summary The document outlines various lighting and cooling system options, including LED strip lights, T8 fixtures, and metal halide lamps, along with specifications for annual peak cooling periods. It provides a structured format for specifying energy-efficient lighting and cooling systems.
ic Ballast Fixture x Other (specify) non‐holiday weekdays only Cooling System 4 ENSC_C&IC_On‐Site Visits Protocol 111024.xlsx 2012‐02‐15 3 of 4 C&I Custom Retrofit Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation On-Site Visit Protocol 6. Lighti...
AI summary The document outlines a protocol for on-site visits under the C&I Custom Retrofit Program, focusing on the assessment of lighting systems, including baseline and new installations, with specific attention to emergency lighting systems.
a‐ Lamp Type List: d‐ Control Type ‐ Choose 1 or b‐ Schedule List e‐ Heating System a CFL ‐ Hard‐wired m Metal Halide ‐ Pulse Start Fixture more between: b CFL ‐ Screw‐in n Metal Halide ‐ Reduced –Wattage Lamp Schedule 1 Dimmers Heating sy...
AI summary The document outlines a list of lamp types, control types, schedules, and heating systems relevant to energy efficiency programs. It includes categories such as CFL, LED, HID lamps, and various control mechanisms like dimmers and occupancy sensors.
c‐ Type of Ballast g LED Strip Lights s T8 Std Energy Savings Fixture Other (specify) f‐ Cooling Systems h LED Street lights/parking lights t T8 Super T8 E‐Electronic i LED Traffic/pedestrian signals u M‐Electromagnetic Cooling System 1 j...
AI summary The text lists various lighting and cooling system options and specifications, including types of ballasts, LED lighting fixtures, and details about annual peak periods for cooling systems.
ic Ballast Fixture x Other (specify) non‐holiday weekdays only Cooling System 4 ENSC_C&IC_On‐Site Visits Protocol 111024.xlsx 2012‐02‐15 4 of 4 C&I New Construction Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation On-Site Visit Protocol 0. Proje...
AI summary This document outlines an on-site visit protocol for the C&I New Construction Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes project details, a section on design process strategies, and a question regarding whether a meeting was conducted to identify energy goals for the project.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation On-Site Visit Protocol 1.5 Construction Certification (Acceptance Testing) Implement an Acceptance Testing protocol to test the operational characteristics of installed systems. Document that installed sy...
AI summary This document outlines protocols for construction certification and operator training for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It emphasizes acceptance testing of installed systems and the collection of documentation and training for building operations teams.
Training given? Collect a statement (if Yes Notes: any) that training was completed. No 1.6.2 Systems manual and full set of design and installation Yes Notes: document available? No 1.6.4 Ensure that information of manuals describes build...
AI summary The document outlines requirements for training, systems manuals, and performance data collection protocols under the C&I New Construction Program. It emphasizes the installation of digital utility meters and the collection and analysis of energy use and building occupancy data for ongoing operational improvements.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation On-Site Visit Protocol 2.1 Section Two: Core Performance Requirements 2.1 Energy Code Compliance In addition to implementing the requirements of the Core Performance program, projects using the program mu...
AI summary The document outlines core performance requirements for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's on-site visit protocol, focusing on energy code compliance and air barrier performance. Buildings must meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1-2004 and MNECB 1997 standards, with specific attention to air sealing and documentation requirements.
documentation. 2.5.3 Ensure all fenestration (windows, skylights, doors) is rated Check Notes: according to Std. CSA A440.2 or the National Fenestration Coucil (NFRC). 2.6 Lighting Controls Install control systems throughout the building,...
AI summary This text outlines requirements for fenestration ratings and lighting controls in buildings. It specifies that windows, skylights, and doors must meet CSA A440.2 or NFRC standards. Lighting controls, including occupancy sensors and time clocks, are required, with specific illumination reduction requirements in occupied and daylit areas. Lighting power density (LPD) limits must also be adhered to.
ting equipment power density does not Check Notes: exceed the allowed lighting power density (LPD), as shown in Table 2.7.1. Provide documentation. Additional Notes: ENSC_CINC_On‐Site Visits Protocol.xlsx 2012‐01‐11 4 of 6 C&I New Construc...
AI summary The document outlines mechanical equipment efficiency requirements for the C&I New Construction Program, including compliance with Energy Star labeling, performance criteria from the Consortium for Energy Efficiency, and specific AFUE ratings for gas furnaces and other equipment.
ventilation at 800 ppm, maximum Check Notes: ventilation at 950 ppm. Differiential settings: max differential between outside and inside: 530 ppm. Additional Notes: ENSC_CINC_On‐Site Visits Protocol.xlsx 2012‐01‐11 5 of 6 C&I New Construct...
AI summary The document outlines protocols for on-site visits under the C&I New Construction Program, focusing on domestic hot water system efficiency and economizer performance. It specifies requirements for insulation, heat traps, flue control dampers, and water-conserving fixtures, as well as features for effective economizer operation.
omizer operation. 2.12.1 Installed economizers should incorporate features as of Check Notes: Criteria 2.12. 2.12.1 Verify that all units larger than 33,000 Btu/hr (9.7 kW) have Check Notes: an economizer installed. 2.13 Heat Recovery Inco...
AI summary This document outlines technical specifications for energy efficiency measures, including economizers, heat recovery systems, and VAV temperature reset strategies. It also references an evaluation report on the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, likely assessing the performance and impact of energy efficiency initiatives in the region.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation provides an assessment of the organization's performance and initiatives related to energy efficiency programs and services.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, detailing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives and programs implemented during that period.
................................................... 3 Figure 2: Methodological Model .............................................................................................................. 4 Ref.: 5725 iv Small Business Energy Solut...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program assessed its process and impact through interviews, on-site visits, and surveys. The program provides direct installation of energy-efficient lighting retrofits to small businesses and facilities.
systems; > efficient halogen MR16, PAR30 and PAR38 lamps; > exterior lighting upgrades such as high-pressure sodium and metal halides; and > lighting controls such as occupancy sensors. Participating businesses pay as little as 20 percent...
AI summary The document outlines the SBES program's modifications in 2011, including allowing delivery agents to choose vendors, adding occupancy sensors, and improving recycling services. Participating businesses pay up to 20% of installation costs, with ENSC covering the remainder. Delivery agents play a key role in program success.
in order to enhance energy savings by lowering the hours of operation. Finally, ENSC developed a participant process flow chart in 2011 in order to make the program participation procedures clearer. Ref.: 5725 v Small Business Energy Solut...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program showed significant growth in participation and energy savings, with 1,468 participants and 23.176 GWh of net electricity savings. Participant satisfaction is high, though paperwork and application assistance received lower ratings and require monitoring.
sfaction ratings compared with 2010 findings and should therefore be closely monitored: the paperwork and procedures required to receive incentives and the assistance provided for program application. Participants were also asked to expres...
AI summary The document highlights participant feedback on a lighting program, noting high satisfaction but a slight decline from the previous year. Changes in 2011, such as allowing delivery agents to choose vendors, may have influenced this. Participants recommend improving communication, marketing, and information dissemination. ENSC plans to expand the program beyond lighting in 2012.
munication need to be observed closely considering the fact that more changes will be made to the program in 2012. Indeed, ENSC is planning on including measures other than lighting to the program. Ref.: 5725 vi Small Business Energy Solut...
AI summary The evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2011 found net energy savings of 23.176 GWh and demand savings of 6.820 MW. Free-ridership was estimated at 12.8%, and internal spillover at 0.8%, resulting in a net-to-gross ratio of 0.88.
Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.88 The evaluation revealed that the SBES program had generated net energy savings of 23.176 GWh and demand savings of 6.820 MW at the generator in 2011. Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Gener...
AI summary The evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2011 found that it generated 23.176 GWh of net energy savings and 6.820 MW of demand savings at the generator. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) was 0.88, indicating that tracked savings were slightly higher than evaluated savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report interactive effects factor calculated for the lighting products installed in non-refrigerated spaces. This factor resulted in a 7.7 percent reduction of gross savings. Moreover, the...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's programs finds that the program works well overall but recommends improvements to the tracking sheet for better validation of savings, including detailed components and correct wattage values.
arger non- residential buildings. Overall, participants as well as program partners agree that broader marketing efforts should be deployed to increase program awareness. SBES-R3. Require additional information during survey campaigns with...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program suggests that broader marketing efforts are needed to increase awareness. It also recommends collecting more detailed information from participants and increasing the number of on-site visits to improve the accuracy of program evaluations and installation ratios.
on at more sites and obtaining a more reliable self-declaration ratio. Increasing the number of on-site visits would also allow calculating more reliable installation ratios. SBES-R4. Revise the list of products eligible for an incentive t...
AI summary The SBES program provides energy-efficient lighting retrofits to small businesses in Nova Scotia, with participants covering 20% of the costs and ENSC covering up to 80%. The program allows financing of the participant's portion through NSPI bills over 24 months at 0% interest. The text suggests revising product eligibility to reduce free-ridership by focusing on high-end products.
ales and administration staff; qualified electrical/lighting auditing staff and qualified electricians. In 2011, the province was divided into six (6) designated areas, with a DA assigned to each one. The DAs are responsible for all aspect...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions Program (SBES) aims to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in small businesses by promoting efficient lighting products and providing support for installations. The program's goals include improving lighting quality, increasing participation through access to resources, and achieving electricity and demand savings.
4.27 MW in 2011. The SBES program generated net electricity savings of 11.21 GWh in 2010, 4.70 GWh in 2009 and 1.52 GWh in 2008. Eligible Measures The promoted measures in 2011 were the following: > A variety of CFLs including hard glass,...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2011 promoted various energy-efficient lighting measures, including CFLs, LEDs, and lighting controls, and achieved electricity savings of 11.21 GWh in 2010. The document outlines the program's logic model and evaluation methodology.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 2 METHODOLOGY 2.1 METHODOLOGICAL MODEL Figure 2 below illustrates the research strategy used for the 2011 evaluation and features the collection tools used. Copies of the interview...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report outlines the methodology used to evaluate the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program. It includes the analysis of program documentation, an interview with the Program Manager, and the use of various sources such as the ENSC website, previous evaluation reports, and program manuals.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SBES Program Program Manual Content Manual Market study or technical study that supports program elements or assumptions Marketing plan Evaluation plan Program theory Logic model Pr...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the SBES program manual and found it contains useful information on responsibilities, eligibility criteria, and administrative forms. However, it lacks critical information that makes understanding the program design and delivery difficult, with some issues being minor and others more significant.
erns minor issues that are easily manageable (the first three following comments address them), while others are more substantial. The following are recommendations to supplement and improve the tool: > Document the major characteristics o...
AI summary The text highlights recommendations for improving the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including documenting program characteristics, ensuring consistent terminology, and specifying financing options for municipal utility customers.
PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of ENSC’s tracking sheet for the SBES program. This tracking sheet is an extract from the online Demand Side Management Data System (DSMDS). In general, the tracking sheet is useful to t...
AI summary Econoler reviewed ENSC's tracking sheet for the SBES program, noting that while it is useful for monitoring, it lacks sufficient detail on installed measures and savings calculations, such as wattage variations and lighting control measures. Some fields are incomplete, and the sheet includes both implemented and unimplemented measures.
ement Data System. For measures with a reduction in hours of operation, the projected hours of operation are also based on information provided by participants during the installation of a measure. Ref.: 5725 10 Small Business Energy Solut...
AI summary The document outlines how demand and energy savings are calculated for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, specifically for lamp replacements. Savings are based on wattage differences and the number of units installed, with hours of operation derived from the database or assumed to be the same for baseline and replacement measures.
or measures without occupancy sensors, the baseline hours of operation and the replacement hours of operation are the same. Thus, the calculation of the replacement hours of operation is not required. For the implementation of T8 and T5 fl...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings for lighting replacements in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It highlights the use of prescriptive values for baseline and new equipment, and the importance of tracking sheets for program evaluation. Adjustments are recommended for future improvements in validation and consistency.
everal adjustments must be made in the future to allow the validation of savings calculations, improve tracking sheet consistency and facilitate program evaluation. The Evaluator recommends that ENSC: > Present the detailed characteristics...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends several improvements to the tracking sheet used for program evaluation, including detailing measure characteristics, identifying lighting controls, and streamlining data fields to improve accuracy and efficiency in savings calculations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report > Set limitations for entries and develop a validation process: To ensure that incorrect values are not entered in the tracking sheet, a validation process should be developed by EN...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses modifications to the SBES program, including the introduction of multiple material vendors, new lighting controls, and a participant process flow chart to improve program implementation and energy savings.
ogram without affecting other programs will generate additional savings. Finally, ENSC developed a participant process flow chart in 2011 in order to make the program participation procedures clearer. ENSC is planning to change the program...
AI summary ENSC is planning to update the SBES program in 2012 by expanding beyond lighting measures. The Evaluator recommends replacing current DAs with more versatile organizations and developing an evaluation plan in parallel with program design to ensure rigorous evaluation and better program outcomes.
the SBES program: > Consider replacing current DAs with organizations not limited to lighting specialization. > Develop an evaluation plan in parallel with program design and development. Ref.: 5725 13 Small Business Energy Solutions Progr...
AI summary The SBES program suggests replacing current DAs with more diversified organizations and developing an evaluation plan alongside program design. The ENSC website provides information about the SBES program, including eligibility, costs, and enrollment processes. Partners reported minimal confusion during the transition from NSPI to ENSC.
artners interviewed (DAs and electricians), the transition of responsibilities from Nova Scotia Power (NSPI) to ENSC did not cause any confusion in the market, except for minor delays and adjustments. The partners state that the implementa...
AI summary Partners involved in the SBES program report a smooth transition from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC, with minor delays. They find the program easy to implement and appreciate recent changes, such as the new program name and material vendor flexibility. However, they recommend creating a mailing list and accepting faxed contracts to improve outreach and efficiency.
Accept faxed contracts: One DA suggests accepting faxed contracts as opposed to originals to improve performance. ENSC could also develop a web-based contract as opposed to paperwork. Ref.: 5725 14 Small Business Energy Solutions Program E...
AI summary A DA suggests accepting faxed contracts to improve performance and streamline eligibility and financing procedures for the SBES program. The program's eligibility criteria and potential for scaling through franchise participation are discussed.
icator of program satisfaction and also suggests that the program has built momentum after the initial years of operation. Table 6: Source of Awareness of SBES Program
AI summary The text discusses the SBES program's growing momentum and satisfaction levels after its initial years of operation, with Table 6 highlighting the source of awareness for the program.
Source of Awareness 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 50 65 61 Friend or business associate (word 42% 22% 23% 51% of mouth) NSPI/ENSC staff/presentation 2 16 18 34 Another/previous participant 4 2 5 30 Contractor or vendor 12 32 14 28 SBE...
AI summary The document presents data on the sources of awareness for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2008 to 2011. It highlights the percentage of participants who became aware of the programs through various channels, such as word of mouth, NSPI/ENSC staff, contractors, and media. The data shows fluctuations in awareness sources across the years.
de of 2 contact) NSPI/ENSC e-mail 2 Don’t know 9 Other 2 3 Multiple mentions2 2 In assessing the source of program awareness, participants had historically been allowed to indicate only one response, representing the source of first contac...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report on the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program indicates that 89% of participants cited energy cost savings as a primary or secondary motivation for joining, with 74% identifying it as their primary motivation. Improving lighting conditions was the second most common motivation, mentioned by 29% of respondents.
08. Improving existing lighting conditions was the second most frequently mentioned motivation, mentioned by three in 10 respondents as a primary (13%) or secondary (16%) motivation (Table 7). The program should continue to promote the fin...
AI summary Improving existing lighting conditions was the second most common motivation for participation, mentioned by 13% as a primary and 16% as a secondary motivation. The program should continue emphasizing the financial benefits of participating in the SBES program, as energy cost savings is the main reason for participation.
2008 2009 2010 2011 Second Second Second Motivations Most Most Most Most Most Most Most Second Most Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Important Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Moti...
AI summary The table presents survey results from 2008 to 2011 regarding motivations for energy efficiency. The primary motivation across years was saving on energy costs, with percentages ranging from 15% to 76%. Other motivations included improving lighting conditions, taking advantage of program incentives, and environmental protection.
nts who needed to obtain permission from the building owner, no one reported that it had been a significant barrier. Table 9: Building Ownership Status and Need for Owner Permission Ownership Status 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 50 65...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that nearly all 2011 respondents considered reducing energy usage and managing energy costs as important for their businesses, indicating a strong awareness of energy management among small businesses.
respondents reported that reducing energy usage (95%) and managing energy costs (93%) were important for their businesses. Table 10: Importance of Energy Management Importance of Energy Management 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 50 65 6...
AI summary Respondents emphasized the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs for their businesses. In 2011, 62% of respondents had previously purchased energy-efficient lighting products, with a notable increase in the adoption of CFLs, T8s/T5s retrofits, and LED Exit lights compared to 2010.
s an increase from 2010 findings. One-quarter purchased LED Exit lights (26%), also an increase from 2010 findings. Table 11: Prior Purchases of Efficient Lighting Products Previously Purchased Products 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 5...
AI summary The text discusses an increase in the purchase of LED Exit lights from 2010 to 2011, with 26% of respondents having previously purchased them. It also highlights an increase in the overall percentage of respondents who had purchased efficient lighting products, from 54% in 2010 to 62% in 2011.
9 5 Don’t know 4 5 3 Ref.: 5725 19 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.6 Program Influence Financial assistance from ENSC is the most important factor that influenced organi...
AI summary The report highlights that financial assistance from ENSC is the most important factor influencing organizations' decisions to implement energy-efficient lighting measures, with a mean importance score of 8.9 on a scale from 0 to 10.
y a program representative (mean of 7.4). Recycling and removal of lamps and fixtures, a program activity, has also influenced decisions to implement energy-efficient lighting measures (mean of 7.2). Table 12: Influence of Program Elements...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of various program elements on the participation of small businesses in the SBES program. Key factors include ENSC financial assistance and program representative interactions. Most respondents expressed a positive attitude toward future energy-efficient equipment purchases.
(93%) reported they would be likely to purchase energy- efficient equipment when replacing equipment in the future. This result indicates positive attitudes of participants towards energy efficiency. Table 13: Likelihood of Purchasing Ener...
AI summary A survey found that 93% of participants indicated they would likely purchase energy-efficient equipment in the future, showing positive attitudes towards energy efficiency. The report includes a table showing trends over several years and discusses satisfaction with the Small Business Energy Solutions Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.8 Satisfaction with the Program The vast majority of 2011 respondents (87%) reported a rating of 5 or 4 on a 5-point scale, where 5 is “very satisfied” and 1 is “not at all sati...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report shows that 87% of respondents were very or somewhat satisfied with the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, though this is a drop from 2010. Satisfaction with paperwork and procedures improved, but project completion on schedule received the lowest scores and requires attention.
86% to receive incentives Assistance with program application 98% 98% 94% 85% Completion of the project on 87% 90% 84% 84% schedule % very satisfied / satisfied Don’t know/refused removed from calculations Ref.: 5725 21 Small Business Ener...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that while most participants in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program were satisfied with the lighting equipment installed, there was a notable drop in satisfaction with aspects such as flickering, lifespan, light quality, and energy savings. This decline coincides with a change in the material vendor in 2011, prompting a recommendation to closely monitor the program's product quality.
he change caused such drop in satisfaction; however, Econoler still recommends closely monitoring this program aspect. Table 15: Satisfaction with Lighting Equipment Satisfaction with Lighting Equipment 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 5...
AI summary The satisfaction levels with lighting equipment in the SBES program have fluctuated over the years, with energy savings showing a significant drop in satisfaction. Econoler recommends monitoring this aspect closely. Participants suggested improvements such as increasing advertising, providing more information, and improving interactions with program representatives.
total savings for each of the five categories selected is underlined. This table includes all savings values, except for the 32 “Rise” jobs for which detailed information could not be retrieved. Table 18: Total Energy Savings for Each Cate...
AI summary The text presents a table of total energy savings by category of existing equipment, with MWh and percentage of total savings. It also describes the selection of regions for site visits, including Halifax, Dartmouth, and Cape Breton, though one site was outside the preferred zones and was still selected.
pe Breton area. However, in one case, the location was outside of the desired zones. That participant was one of the few large sites available for an on-site visit and was selected nonetheless. Ref.: 5725 25 Small Business Energy Solutions...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program discusses the selection process for on-site visits, ensuring coverage of major equipment categories and proximity to urban centers, with some exceptions for sites outside the desired zones.
allowing for duplication in case on-site visits could not be scheduled for some sites in the first sample. For large duplicate sites, the selection included sites located outside of the desired zones. Finally, it is to be noted that the 15...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used for on-site visits and data collection during a program evaluation, including the installation of time-of-use loggers and the collection of information on product installations and facility usage. It also mentions the calculation of gross savings based on program tracking data and on-site visits.
1, a total of 17,378 closed measures were identified, based on the information in the tracking sheet and collected for most of the “Rise” jobs. The allocation of gross savings to different categories Ref.: 5725 26 Small Business Energy Sol...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including the allocation of energy savings from the 'Rise' project and the review of unitary wattage values for different types of energy efficiency measures. Savings were allocated based on available data and proportions from other measures.
d in combination with a lighting measure. For this measure, the energy impact is quantified as a reduction in pre-retrofit hours of operation and is directly incorporated in every measure implemented. For each type of old or new equipment,...
AI summary The document discusses issues with the accuracy of unitary wattage values used in energy savings calculations for lighting systems. It highlights inconsistencies in the data provided by ENSC and the need to correct wattage values for accurate validation of savings.
System Unitary Wattage Adjusted Unitary Wattage New CFLs HPS flood 70 W lamps (old) 70 W and 95 W 95 W Mercury vapour – 175 W New CFLs 193 W and 205 W 205 W (old) Mercury vapour – 250 W New CFLs 275 W and 290 W 290 W (old) Based on the sys...
AI summary The document discusses adjustments to unitary wattage for new CFLs compared to old HPS and mercury vapour lamps, leading to increased energy and demand savings. The adjustments are based on efficiency measures and are applied to final CFL savings values.
of unitary wattage adjustments for HPS flood-70 W, mercury vapour-175 W and mercury vapour-250 W lamps. They were applied to the final CFL savings values. 4.2.2 Hours of Operation Currently, the hours of operation in the program tracking s...
AI summary The document discusses the application of unitary wattage adjustments to specific lamp types and the methodology used to determine hours of operation for lighting systems through on-site visits and time-of-use loggers. A self-declaration ratio of 83.33% was calculated, but due to a high error margin, it was not used to adjust energy savings. The Evaluator recommends increasing the number of sites with data loggers for more reliable results.
he “Rise” project. The line loss factors were provided by Nova Scotia Power for each rate code. The total revised savings obtained for each category of measures implemented are presented in Table 20. The total gross energy savings for the...
AI summary The document discusses the 'Rise' project and provides line loss factors for each rate code, as well as the total revised savings from the SBES program, including gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
T8s Measure Category: New Ballasts and CFLs Exit Signs T5s Others New Lamps Lamps or Fixtures Program Tracking sheet Total program tracking savings (GWh) 0.382 19.243 4.590 0.400 0.067 1.758 Total program tracking demand savings 0.116 5.82...
AI summary The text presents a program tracking sheet detailing energy savings from various lighting efficiency initiatives, including new ballasts, CFLs, exit signs, T5s, and others, with metrics on total program savings, demand savings, and adjustments for wattage and hours of operation.
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Gross Demand Savings - at Meter 0.116 5.827 1.352 0.046 0.026 0.422 (MW) Diversity factor 70% 70% 70% 100% 70% 70% Total Gross Peak Demand Savings - at 0.081 4.079 0.946 0.046 0.018 0.295 Meter (MW)...
AI summary The text presents data on demand savings and peak demand savings at the meter and generator levels, along with factors such as diversity and line loss. It references an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, and mentions interactive effects in section 4.3.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of efficiency programs as part of the 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling systems. In the case of the SBES program, replacement of regular lighting...
AI summary The SBES program's energy efficiency measures have interactive effects on heating and cooling systems. Replacing regular lighting with efficient lighting in non-refrigerated spaces increases winter heating loads and decreases summer cooling loads. An interactive effects factor of -7.7% was applied, based on a 1992 ADS study for Hydro-Québec using DOE2 simulations of electrically heated commercial buildings.
on of industrial customers, rendering the information collected difficult to use for other C&IC programs. Sites with electric heating systems were over-represented in the sample used for EP-DI on-site visits. Information for a total of 34...
AI summary The evaluation of the interactive effects factor for lighting products in commercial buildings indicates that electric heating with air conditioning leads to a significant reduction in energy savings, while no electric heating with air conditioning shows a slight increase. The report recommends collecting more detailed data on heating sources and air conditioning usage in future evaluations.
- -7.7% 4 ADS ASSOCIÉS, “Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale,” report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. Ref.: 5725 32 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nov...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating energy savings from lighting products installed in refrigeration units, using an approach similar to that used in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It mentions an interactive effects factor of +40 percent for such installations and references a table presenting gross savings including these effects.
ts installed in refrigerated areas. The gross savings including interactive effects are presented in Table 22. Table 22: Gross Savings at the Meter – Including Interactive Effects Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Lighting Lighting...
AI summary The text presents gross energy and demand savings from the SBES program, including interactive effects, with a net-to-gross ratio calculation discussed in the following section.
ition to program influences. Econoler’s approach is consistent with evaluation, measurement and verification methods used in other jurisdictions such as California, New York, Oregon and Pennsylvania. Using this approach, the survey results...
AI summary The evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program found a free-ridership level of 12.8 percent, close to the 13.6 percent from 2010. The report suggests revising rebate-eligible products to high-end items to reduce free-ridership. Internal spillover effects were also measured through participant surveys.
installed additional efficient lighting products following their previous participation in the program. Additional questions were used to verify the eligibility of the additional purchases by asking: > The date of the purchase to ensure it...
AI summary The evaluation of a program found low internal spillover, with only four out of 61 participants confirming additional energy-efficient lighting purchases after initial participation. These purchases contributed 4.71 MWh in energy savings, representing 0.8% of total savings. Follow-up calls were used to verify purchases and collect product details.
rchases correspond to energy savings attributable to the program totalling 4.71 MWh for these participants. Spillover represented 0.8 percent of total energy savings for all the participants surveyed. Using the free-ridership level establi...
AI summary The evaluation report estimates the net savings for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program in 2011, using the NTGR value and accounting for interactive effects. Total net energy savings at the generator are estimated at 23.176 GWh, while net demand savings are estimated at 6.820 MW.
Effects Energy Savings Tracked Savings 28.978 GWh 28.978 GWh 28.978 GWh 0.90 26.080 GWh from ENSC Evaluation Results 28.426 GWh 28.426 GWh 26.336 GWh 0.88 23.176 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings 8.536 MW 8.536 MW 8.536 MW 0.90 7.682 MW f...
AI summary The evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program highlights energy and demand savings tracked and evaluated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. The results show slightly lower net savings due to an interactive effects factor from lighting products in non-refrigerated spaces.
Program 1. Document the major characteristics of the program: The goal of the program Manual and its objectives in terms of energy or demand savings, as well as the measures Content promoted by the program and their deemed savings should b...
AI summary The document outlines several recommendations for improving the program manual, including documenting program characteristics, ensuring eligibility for financing, maintaining consistent terminology, and providing a 'base case' for calculating energy savings. These changes aim to enhance clarity and transparency in the program's implementation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, providing an assessment of their energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
ual relationships in the program manual (section 8) should be modified in accordance with these changes. Program 8. Present the detailed characteristics of each measure and the Tracking corresponding unitary savings to allow for savings ca...
AI summary The document highlights issues with the Program Tracking Sheet in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, noting that it lacks detailed information on measure components and lighting controls, which hinders the Evaluator's ability to validate savings calculations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the year 2011, assessing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency programs and initiatives.
such as hours of operation will not exceed a defined range or that inconsistent postal codes are not entered in the database. Occurrences of these two inconsistencies were encountered in the database. The validation process could also be u...
AI summary The document discusses the need for improving data validation processes in energy efficiency programs and recommends replacing current DAs with more versatile organizations. It also emphasizes the importance of developing evaluation plans in parallel with program design and development.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, detailing the performance and outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives in the region.
ENSC 15. Supplement the ENSC website with the participant process flow chart: Website ENSC developed a participant process flow chart in 2011 in order to make the program participation procedures clearer. This participant process flow char...
AI summary The document outlines suggestions for improving program participation and delivery for ENSC and SBES. These include updating the ENSC website with a participant process flow chart, creating a mailing list, accepting faxed contracts, streamlining eligibility and financing procedures, and continuing to promote the financial benefits of the SBES program.
Continue to promote the financial benefit: The program should continue to Perspectives promote the financial benefit of participating in the SBES program since savings on energy cost is the main participation reason. 20. Monitor satisfacti...
AI summary The SBES program should continue to emphasize financial benefits to participants. However, there is a need to monitor satisfaction with paperwork, project timelines, and product quality, particularly after a vendor change in 2011, which may have affected satisfaction levels with lighting equipment.
y of products. There is no saying that the change caused such drop in satisfaction; however, Econoler still recommends closely monitoring this program aspect. Ref.: 5725 40 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Cor...
AI summary The text discusses the Small Business Energy Solutions Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, noting a potential drop in satisfaction without attributing it to a specific cause, while recommending continued monitoring of the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, likely assessing the performance or impact of energy efficiency programs or initiatives.
Participants 22. Enhance program marketing and communication: Increasing Perspectives advertising/marketing (18%), providing more information to reduce confusion (11%) and improving interactions with program representatives (7%) were the m...
AI summary The document outlines several recommendations to improve the SBES program, including enhancing marketing and communication, correcting erroneous wattage values, increasing data logger installations and on-site visits, collecting more information on heating and air conditioning use, and revising eligible product lists for rebates.
27. Revise the list of products eligible: The Evaluator recommends revising the list of products eligible for a rebate through the SBES program, in order to restrict eligibility to high-end products that business owners would not likely in...
AI summary The Evaluator suggests revising the SBES program to limit rebate eligibility to high-end products that small business owners are unlikely to install themselves. The 2011 evaluation report notes that energy costs averaged 13.8% of annual operating budgets for participating businesses.
74% 74% 69% Lease 22 26 25 31 Don’t know 2 Ref.: 5725 42 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Respondents in the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 samples represented a diverse variety o...
AI summary The text references an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlighting the diversity of business types represented in the 2008 to 2011 samples.
onstruction 2 Public Library 2 Public order and safety 4 2 Wholesaler 2 Animal shelter 2 Equipment rental 2 Publishing 2 Other 4 13 Ref.: 5725 43 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Re...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program highlights that 51% of respondents had fewer than 5 employees, with the majority (90%) having fewer than 20. Table 27 provides data on the distribution of full-time equivalent workers across different business sizes from 2008 to 2011.
n Report Over eight out of 10 2011 respondents (84%) reported that their businesses were independent and not part of a larger company. Table 29: Type of Company Type of Company 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sample Size 50 49 62 61 Independent 84% 70...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program discusses survey data indicating that 84% of respondents were independent businesses, and 64% had only one business location in Nova Scotia. The report includes an interview guide for the program manager as part of the process evaluation.
- INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: Small Business Energy Solutions Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: List of questions (Q) and comments (C) discussed Source: Evaluation Report 2010 Page...
AI summary This text discusses the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, including questions about the program's theory, incentives, structure, and eligibility criteria. It also mentions the program's name change from Small Business Direct Install and considerations for improving the program manual.
ng a minimum number of installations? Page 7 Q: If the main objective of ENSC is to save electricity, why are municipal utilities not eligible for the bill financing of 20% like the clients of NSP? Q: What is the proportion (%) of particip...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions raised during a regulatory proceeding regarding the Small Business Energy Solutions Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions focus on program eligibility, incentive levels, verification processes, and administrative procedures.
e participant) to only one organization? Attachment A (Program Flow Chart) Q: You are using the term labor vendor instead of material vendor. Is it the same? If yes why do you call them differently? C: This flow chart is for the internal u...
AI summary The text discusses various attachments and comments related to the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, including requests for clarification on terminology, document formatting, and program evaluation methods. Comments focus on improving clarity, participant engagement, and the structure of evaluation tools.
DELIVERY AGENTS PROCESS EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ENSC ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM PARTNERS Program Name: Small Business Energy Solutions How to fill this form: This is a word document that integrates some form features. All you have to d...
AI summary The document is a process evaluation questionnaire for ENSC's Small Business Energy Solutions program, asking partners to provide information about their role, experience with the transition from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC, and the impact on their relationship with the Program Administrator.
9b- The fact that now you chose your material vendor to get better prices has been a: Positive experience Negative experience Q10 – Who provides you with leads for potential participants? Ref.: 5725 53 Small Business Energy Solutions Progr...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Small Business Energy Solutions Program delivered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks about experiences with vendor selection, lead generation, market confusion, program name changes, modifications to the program, and complaints received during program delivery.
lved in the delivery of that program? Yes: If yes, from which party? (Please do not mention names, just the position of the party.) No Don’t know Q14a- What was the complaint about? Ref.: 5725 54 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Eff...
AI summary The text is part of an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes a questionnaire for electricians and program partners to identify barriers to program implementation and gather feedback for improving performance.
TH ELECTRICIANS PROCESS EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ENSC ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM PARTNERS Program Name: Small Business Energy Solutions How to fill this form: This is a word document that integrates some form features. All you have to d...
AI summary This document is a process evaluation questionnaire for ENSC's Small Business Energy Solutions program, aimed at program partners. It includes questions about their role, duration of partnership, and the impact of the transition from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC on market perception and relationship with the Program Administrator.
t applicable It was the same Program Administrator I had to deal with a new PA The transition went smoothly The transition caused some delays or adjustments Other, please comment Q2 - On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very bad and 10 is...
AI summary The text is a survey questionnaire related to the Small Business Energy Solutions Program administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks participants about their experience with the Program Administrator, satisfaction levels, complaints received, and suggestions for improvement.
Q7 – On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied), what is your satisfaction level in regard to the marketing and outreach activities to implement the program? Q 7a - If your answer to Q7 was equal to or l...
AI summary The text contains survey questions evaluating the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, focusing on participant satisfaction with marketing and outreach, relationship with partners, and market confusion. It references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
rogram, did you experience or witness any confusion in the market among the parties, including yours and/or the participants? Yes: which ones? What was the confusion about? No Don’t know Ref.: 5725 59 Small Business Energy Solutions Progra...
AI summary The text is from an evaluation report of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about program name changes, modifications, complaints, and barriers to implementation. The report seeks feedback on the program's operation and effectiveness.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. Your answers will be treated in total confidentiality (no names will ever be mentioned in the evaluation report) and we hope that...
AI summary The document is an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including an interview guide for contractors. It outlines procedures for completing a questionnaire and emphasizes confidentiality.
ions Please indicate your company name: Q1 - How would you define your role(s) as an ENSC energy efficiency program partner? Q1a – How long have you had that role (specify months or years)? Q1b - If you were a program partner before it cha...
AI summary The text is a set of questions directed at ENSC energy efficiency program partners, asking about their roles, the transition from Nova Scotia Power to ENSC, and their relationship with the ENSC Program Administrator. It also inquires about complaints received from program participants.
a score? Reason(s): Q3 – Did you receive any complaints from participants in the program? Yes What was (were) the complaint(s) about? No Don’t Know Refused Not applicable Ref.: 5725 63 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nov...
AI summary The text is a portion of a 2011 evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes survey questions about program participation, complaints, satisfaction levels, and suggestions for improvement.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q8 – Last year, have you been interviewed by another evaluator about the same program? Yes No Not applicable Q8a – If you answered Yes to Q8, we would like your opinion on the frequ...
AI summary This document is part of an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes questions about program evaluation, partnerships, market confusion, and program modifications.
Program)? Q13- What is your opinion in regard to program on-course modifications other than the change of program name (e.g., more products to install, expand territory or any other modification)? Easy to adjust to the way you work Require...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about program modifications, complaints, and barriers to implementation related to the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It also references an evaluation report from 2011 by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX VII - PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Participant Survey ENSC Small Business Energy Solutions Program Oct 5, 2011 Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCT...
AI summary This document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including a participant survey questionnaire. The survey aims to assess the program's effectiveness and gather feedback from participants.
, or utility account manager]. Name: _ Telephone #: (Note: Thank and terminate call. Schedule interview with best contact regarding experience with the program.) V5. According to our information, through its participation in the Small Busi...
AI summary This text outlines a survey related to the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, asking participants about their prior involvement in other energy efficiency programs. It includes instructions for interviewers and questions about program participation and previous purchases.
3 d. _ Program 4 P3. (REPEAT FOR EACH PROGRAM IDENTIFIED IN P2) In what year did your company or organization participate in [Program x]? ACCEPT MULTIPLE YEARS 1. Before 2000 2. 2000 3. 2001 4. 2002 5. 2003 6. 2004 7. 2005 8. 2006 9. 2007...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to participation in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including the year of participation and how participants learned about the program. It also asks for the most important reason for participation.
Don’t know) 99. (Refused) P5. What was the SINGLE most important reason your company or organization chose to participate in the program? (DO NOT READ – accept one response) 1. (To take advantage of program incentives) 2. (To see what else...
AI summary The text provides a set of survey questions related to participation in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including reasons for participation and prior purchases of energy-efficient lighting products. It also references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report P8. What purchases of energy-efficient lighting products had your company or organization made before participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program? (Record all that...
AI summary The text includes survey questions from an evaluation report on the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, focusing on prior energy-efficient lighting purchases and potential free-ridership. It asks participants if they had plans to install energy-efficient lighting before joining the program.
w) 99. (Refused) [READ FIRST TIME THROUGH ONLY] Now I would like to ask you to consider what actions you would have taken in the absence of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. Ref.: 5725 72 Small Business Energy Solutions Program...
AI summary The text references a 2011 evaluation report on the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes a survey question asking respondents about the likelihood they would have taken specific energy efficiency actions in the absence of the program, such as installing energy-efficient lighting products.
rgy-efficient lighting products that you installed through the Program but at a later date? _Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused IF FR2c > 5, then ask: FR2cc. DO NOT POSE FR2cc IF DON’T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your previ...
AI summary The text is a survey question related to the Small Business Energy Solutions program, asking respondents about the likelihood of installing energy-efficient lighting products at a later date if the program had not been available, and how many months later they would have installed them.
4. 2 to less than 3 years later? 5. 3 to less than 4 years later? 6. 4 or more years later? 7. (Never) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FR3. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid up to 80% of the $[TOTAL PROJECT COST] total project cost. If your compa...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's incentives on project decisions and the importance of various factors in implementing energy-efficient lighting products. The survey includes response scales and is part of an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program.
2011 Evaluation Report Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. Efficiency Nova Scotia _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Financial Assistance b. Information received during the initial contact by the program _ Response _98 Don’t Know _...
AI summary This 2011 evaluation report examines the Small Business Energy Solutions Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on factors such as financial assistance, information provided during initial contact, and corporate policies related to energy efficiency. The report includes survey responses and references a SPILLOVER series.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SPILLOVER [SP series] SP1. Now I'd like you to think of the time since you participated in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. Has your company purchased and installed any...
AI summary The document is a 2011 evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, containing a series of survey questions aimed at assessing participants' actions post-program, including whether they installed additional energy-efficient lighting products and if they received or plan to receive financing or incentives from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs.
what are the additional energy-efficient lighting products that you have installed on your own after participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. Did you install… Ref.: 5725 76 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Effic...
AI summary The text is from an evaluation report on the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, asking participants about additional energy-efficient lighting products they installed after program participation. It includes a list of specific lighting products and options for respondents to indicate whether they installed them.
-D exit signs? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SP4h. Other energy-efficient lighting products? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) SP5. [IF SP3 = 2 ‘NO’] Did your experience with the energy-efficient lighting products installed through the Small B...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, focusing on the use of energy-efficient lighting products and customer satisfaction with the program. It also references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report S2. Also on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means ‘not at all satisfied’ and 5=‘very satisfied’, how satisfied are you with the following aspects of your experience of the Small Business...
AI summary The text presents a survey evaluating the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, focusing on customer satisfaction with various aspects of the program, including service delivery, installation processes, and incentives. It also includes a question about future likelihood of purchasing energy-efficient products and explores barriers to action and recommendations for improvement.
installing or replacing energy-using products for your business in the future? [98 = Don’t know/Don’t recall, 99 = Refused] BARRIERS TO ACTION & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS [B series] B1. Does your company or organization own or lease...
AI summary The text outlines a series of survey questions related to barriers faced by businesses in implementing energy efficiency measures through the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It includes questions about property ownership, permission requirements, and the identification of the most significant barrier.
2. No (Go to B7) 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall) (Go to B7) 99. (Refused) (Go to B7) B5. What was the SINGLE most important barrier? (Do not read - one response) 1. (Concern that actual bill savings would be less than estimated) 2. (Lack of...
AI summary The text presents a survey form asking about the most important barriers to participation in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes options such as concerns about bill savings, lack of information, and approval delays, and asks respondents to rate the importance of reducing energy usage on a scale of 1 to 5.
f 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all important’ and 5=‘very important’, how important is reducing energy usage to your company or organization? [98 = Don’t know/Don’t recall, 99 = Refused] B8. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‘not at all important’...
AI summary The text contains survey questions aimed at understanding the importance of energy usage reduction and cost management for businesses, as well as feedback on the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It asks about the percentage of annual operating budgets attributed to energy costs and seeks suggestions for program improvements and the potential benefits of a participation flowchart.
Not at all 96. (Depends on what the figure or illustration would have been) 97. (This kind of document already exists) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 81 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation...
AI summary The text includes a series of responses to survey questions related to the Small Business Energy Solutions Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions pertain to building activity and the number of full-time equivalent workers at a facility, with multiple response options provided.
Other? 17. Vacant 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) F3. Approximately how many full-time equivalent workers are employed at this facility? 1. Fewer than 5 2. 5 to 9 3. 10 to 19 4. 20 to 49 5. 50 to 99 6. 100 to 249 7. 250 or More 98. (Don’t k...
AI summary The text contains a series of survey questions related to workforce size, building operating hours, company structure, and number of business locations in Nova Scotia. These questions are part of an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) F6. How many business locations does your organization have in Nova Scotia? [RECORD A NUMBER 1-99; 998 = Don’t know, 999 = Refused] END. Those are all the questions I have for you. I thank you very much for...
AI summary The document contains a series of survey questions and an on-site visit protocol for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes sections for gathering business location information and details about heating and cooling systems.
2 3 Heat source Heating system type Heating system efficiency or COP Cooling system: Please fill the table below for each cooling source at the site Cooling system 1 Cooling system Cooling system Cooling system 4 2 3 Cooling system type Co...
AI summary The document provides a template for reporting heating and cooling system details, including efficiency metrics and occupancy schedules, as part of an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
or example: 8:00 to 17:00) Hours per day 2 Operating hours Hours per day 3 Operating hours Hours per day Ref.: 5725 85 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4 MEASURES INFORMATION...
AI summary The document outlines the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on fluorescent lighting measures, including baseline and installed fixtures and ballasts.
Visual check of spare baseline parts if still in stock, for example: magnetic, electronic, etc.): Type – Fluorescent lamp ballasts installed (From database for example: magnetic, electronic, etc.): Ref.: 5725 86 Small Business Energy Solut...
AI summary The text provides a template for evaluating the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, focusing on the verification of fluorescent lamp ballasts, baseline lamps, and new fluorescent lamps installed. It includes data collection methods such as database checks, on-site validation, and contact declarations to ensure accuracy and compliance.
When were the lamps removed or when did they burn? Is the facility manager planning to have them replaced? If, not why? Are they OK with the reduced light level? Hours of use per year (From database) Ref.: 5725 87 Small Business Energy Sol...
AI summary The text contains questions and data collection items related to the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It includes inquiries about lighting usage, equipment hours, and fixture status, as well as data fields for lighting and cooling/heating systems.
/Visual check of spare baseline parts if still in stock): Number – Baseline lamps (From database): Number – Baseline lamps (Contact declaration): Number – CFL Hardwire installed (From database): Ref.: 5725 88 Small Business Energy Solution...
AI summary The document contains data collection forms for evaluating the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including metrics on baseline lamps, CFL installations, power usage, and facility usage patterns. This information is used for program evaluation and energy efficiency assessment.
ate the corresponding cooling system number for each section (Site validation/Contact declaration): Percent of the time when both lighting and heating are ON in this section (Contact declaration): Ref.: 5725 89 Small Business Energy Soluti...
AI summary The text includes forms and evaluation reports related to energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on lighting and heating systems validation, lamp status verification, and exit sign LED measurements. It involves data collection for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Number – Exit sign LEDs (On-site validation): Power – Baseline lamp [W] (From database): Power – Baseline lamps [W] (Contact Declaration//Visual check of spare baseline parts if still in stock): Ref.: 5725 90 Small Business Energy Solution...
AI summary This document appears to be an evaluation report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on the installation and performance of LED lighting and occupancy sensors, including validation checks and follow-up questions regarding their usage and condition.
Is the equipment still used? If not, which percentage is operating? When did the change occur? Number – Occupancy sensor (From database): Number – Occupancy sensor installed (On-site validation): Ref.: 5725 91 Small Business Energy Solutio...
AI summary The document contains a table and questions related to the evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It focuses on occupancy sensors and the lamps they control, including their usage, wattage, and operation hours before installation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Schedule Lighting Monday Tuesday Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat. Sun. Holidays # schedule Operating hours (for example: 8:00 1 to 17:00) Hours per day Operating hours 2 Hours per day Operating...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program includes a question about the use of new lighting installed through the program, asking respondents to select the statement that most accurately describes their company's or organization's usage.
2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX VIII-2 LIGHTING LOGGER INSTALLATION PROTOCOL 1 SELECTION OF THE LOCATION FOR LOGGER INSTALLATION Econoler will provide Equilibrium with a list of sections where a data logger should be installed for each sit...
AI summary This document outlines the protocol for installing lighting loggers, including site selection, logger placement, and sensitivity adjustment. It ensures accurate data collection by specifying that loggers should be installed on representative fixtures and not on permanently closed lights or exit signs.
itions and with the light to be monitored off, the logger is off (ON symbol is missing). The logger should then show the ON symbol when the monitored light is turned on. 9 Ref.: 5725 96 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency No...
AI summary The document provides instructions on adjusting the sensitivity of a LIGHTINGlogger and resetting its memory for use in the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. It emphasizes proper calibration to ensure accurate monitoring of lighting devices.
od includes a business holiday (for example, Thanksgiving). Furthermore, even if the metering period overlaps on more than 7 days, only data for a complete week with only 7 days should be reported. Ref.: 5725 97 Small Business Energy Solut...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for data collection under the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, emphasizing the use of Smart-ware software for extracting data in CSV and .log formats, and proper naming conventions for data files.
MEAN VALUE OF: PA1 Score: (FR2a ; FR2b) FR3. If your company had not received the rebate offered by the program, would you have paid for the full cost of the project, including the portion FR3 = Answer x 10% covered by the rebate? (Scale 0...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions related to evaluating the impact of an energy efficiency program, focusing on factors such as rebate influence, cost considerations, and likelihood of installation without the program. It includes scoring mechanisms based on responses to these questions.
ship level for the program corresponded to the weighted average of the final adjusted free-ridership levels calculated for each participant with the energy savings associated with each participant. Ref.: 5725 100 160, rue Saint-Paul, burea...
AI summary This document is a final report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation evaluating completed energy efficiency projects at New Page in Port Hawkesbury in 2011. It includes a detailed review and analysis of the measurement and verification (M&V) report, a follow-up investigation into feedstock and product characteristics, and other hypotheses for higher savings achieved.
hieved............................................ 8 3 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................ 10 List of Tables Table 1 : Summary of Results .....
AI summary This document outlines an evaluation of energy efficiency projects at New Page's Port Hawkesbury paper mill, conducted by Econoler based on a measurement and verification report by EPS. The evaluation is part of the 2011 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation program review.
in the results than would a single approach. According to the SEP procedure, the top-down approach should be used as the main source of savings while the bottom-up approach as a “sanity check” only. Table 1 of the report is reproduced belo...
AI summary The evaluation of energy efficiency projects at New Page in Port Hawkesbury found that the top-down approach identified higher energy and demand savings compared to the bottom-up 'sanity check' method. The top-down analysis reported 154.2 GWh in energy savings and 17.8 MW in demand savings, which are 26% higher than the bottom-up results of 122 GWh.
TOTAL (incl. project 4) 114.4 13.25 - - - - TOTAL (excl. project 4) 103.1 11.9 122.0 13.9 154.2 17.8 The analysis was conducted for projects implemented over a period ranging from June 2007 to August 2011. The baseline period was June 2007...
AI summary The text outlines the timeline and methodology of an energy efficiency analysis conducted between June 2007 and August 2011, including baseline, middle, and follow-up periods. A multi-variable regression model with normalized plant output was used for the analysis, excluding one incomplete measure.
re that was planned for completion in December 2011 were thus not included in the present analysis. The analysis was done using a multi-variable regression model with a normalization of plant output. The regression analysis was performed o...
AI summary The evaluation of energy efficiency projects at New Page in Port Hawkesbury used a multi-variable regression model with normalized plant output. The analysis was conducted using Excel and reviewed by the Evaluator. Statistical models were developed for baseline and post-implementation periods, with variables tested and refined to explain energy usage variations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Review the final model is logically derived from the various analyses. The analyses included an initial assessment with a large number of variables followed by several more specific analys...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Review by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses statistical analyses performed on various factors affecting energy usage, including pulp freeness, refining energy, and temperature impacts. The analyses were conducted using advanced statistical methods, and the Evaluator commends the quality of work done by EPS.
s, including free floating intercept and forced zero intercept. The statistical analyses performed are state-of-the-art and well done and the Evaluator has no concerns with the work performed by EPS. The figure below presents one of the an...
AI summary The document discusses a CUSUM analysis of TMP energy usage at the New Page plant, highlighting trends in energy usage before and after the implementation of energy efficiency measures. The Evaluator notes the effectiveness of the analysis and raises questions about discrepancies in the timeline of improvements and energy usage changes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Review Baseline (year 1) NPPH Total electric load (MW) = Paper Production (tons/d) 0.048 + TMP production (admt/d) 0.090 + Temp (°K) 0.022; Middle Period (year 2-3) NPPH Total electric loa...
AI summary The document presents equations used to calculate the total electric load at New Page Paper, Port Hawkesbury, based on paper production, TMP production, and temperature. The equations show strong statistical correlation (R2 > 0.99) and resulted in energy savings of 154.2 GWh and 17.8 MW.
inal product sold. The raw material density variation is an operational reality of paper plants and there is no reliable and affordable solution to density variation measurement on a continuous basis. Subsequent interviews with the New Pag...
AI summary The document discusses the operational challenges of measuring raw material density variation in paper production, noting that while there are seasonal and annual variations in feedstock composition, these variations follow a repetitive pattern and do not significantly affect long-term energy usage assessments.
followed a repetitive profile over the years and it was correct to assume that there was no substantial energy usage variation caused by feedstocks over the analysis period. Type of Finished Product The SEP protocol does not mention specif...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of energy efficiency projects at New Page, Port Hawkesbury, noting that variations in finished product type could influence energy usage. However, these factors were not included in the statistical analysis conducted by EPS, which only considered mass and outside air temperature.
eliminary report. Mr. Frith estimates that this element is likely the element responsible for the significant increase in performance observed in the whole plant energy usage analysis. Measure No. 5 Another possibility for the additional s...
AI summary The evaluator concludes that the energy savings reported for the New Page, Port Hawkesbury plant are a fair representation of actual savings. However, some factors like feedstock and product characteristics were not sufficiently discussed in the report, though their impact on energy usage is considered minimal.
letter of Comment to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board RE: Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's application for approval of "Demand Side Management Plan" for 2013 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to comment and express my concern...
AI summary The letter expresses concern over an unnoted energy efficiency tax on power bills, questioning Nova Scotia Power's monopoly and the board's duty to ensure fair rates. It references the Wheeler report's findings on efficiency and generator costs, noting changes due to pulp mill closures, while advocating for continued energy conservation efforts.
2b. Any agreement which accesses public funds or bills the public directly needs to be made readily available to the public (mass media, direct mail out, etc.) and written in language understandable by the average reader of a public newspa...
AI summary The text argues that ENSC has not made agreements involving public funds or direct billing accessible to the public in understandable language. It references a 2011 NSUARB document and cites a poll showing public confusion over energy efficiency charges, emphasizing the need for transparency and clarity in billing practices.
4b. If the entire province of Nova Scotia and its population were to disappear today, the effect on the global environment and energy concerns would be an insignificantly small percentage. We have a worldwide exploding population of over s...
AI summary The text argues that Nova Scotia's environmental and energy impact is negligible globally, criticizing overreactions to climate change and funding for ENSC. It claims Nova Scotia's population is insignificant compared to global totals and that conservation efforts should focus on practical savings rather than funding ENSC, described as a poorly spent make-work group.
5b. By forcibly extracting money from working Nova Scotians, we are depriving them of the means by which they can improve their own energy efficiency through their own efforts, at a much lesser cost. Nova Scotians need information and guid...
AI summary The argument asserts that forcibly extracting funds from Nova Scotians hinders their ability to improve energy efficiency independently. It references past participation in the federal EnerGuide program (now ecoEnergy – Retrofit Homes), which was cut due to high administrative costs. The province, facing economic challenges, cannot afford similar programs, as citizens are already burdened by mandatory funding.
6a. Not requesting assistance with various energy programs does not necessarily mean that the individual/family is not making or has not made significant improvements in energy efficiency. It seems when the survey results are viewed (See f...
AI summary The text argues that not participating in energy programs does not equate to a lack of energy efficiency, citing extensive home improvements made without government aid. The author criticizes ENSC and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for penalizing electric heating despite significant energy conservation efforts, highlighting the infeasibility of alternative heating methods in their residence.
6b. Owners of electrically heated homes unfairly targeted. Having an electrically heated home, once considered a positive move in cost efficiency, has now become a liability under the ENSI rate mechanism. As explained above , modification...
AI summary Owners of electrically heated homes argue they are unfairly targeted by ENSI's rate mechanism. The text highlights the high cost of modifying such homes to alternative heating sources and emphasizes that these homes use electricity (from coal) but avoid other fossil fuels, a nuance decision-makers should recognize.
9. Much of the mandate of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation appears to be a duplication of already available federal information and programs. See also, 5b above. Anything which increases costs to Nova Scotians needs to be carefully scrut...
AI summary The text argues that Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) mandate overlaps with federal programs, raising concerns about increased costs for Nova Scotians. It emphasizes that energy savings are irrelevant if the province becomes financially dependent on others.
11. Ongoing rate increases for 'Energy Efficiency Programs', reflected on the electrical power bills issued by Nova Scotia Power Inc., are not made obvious, justified, or explained in any manner to the ratepayer. Even if the findings based...
AI summary The document criticizes Nova Scotia Power Inc. for failing to transparently justify or explain ongoing rate increases for Energy Efficiency Programs on electricity bills. It highlights that rates have more than doubled in under a year without public input, disproportionately affecting low-income ratepayers. The text also calls for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to improve efficiency and questions the advocacy priorities of ENSC when funded by ratepayer money.
12. Hardship and Benefit not clearly differentiated in Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's plan. In reviewing the literature available, it seems that far too often, the approach has simply been to encourage (force) a reduction in energy u...
AI summary The analysis criticizes Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) plan for failing to distinguish between hardship and benefit in energy reduction measures. It argues that excessive energy use reduction imposes undue hardship on homeowners and businesses, conflating savings with unnecessary costs. The text references a prior citation (Ref. 5a) supporting this claim.
13. Suggested savings frequently proven to be more expensive Converting an existing electrically heated home to a fossil fuel appliance heated home is often a very expensive option. Many of these homes do not have the physical room for suc...
AI summary The text argues that energy-saving measures like converting electric heating to fossil fuels or using compact fluorescent bulbs often result in higher costs due to installation expenses, product failures, and hidden consumer costs. It challenges ENSC's claims of savings, emphasizing that true savings must reflect direct consumer benefits, not just vague metrics.
opens them up to considering a course of action. A pull strategy motivates the individual to make a choice on what to do once they have already decided on or considered a general course of action. The classic example of a pull strategy is...
AI summary The text explains pull and push strategies in energy efficiency programs. Pull strategies incentivize action through rebates and subsidies, while push strategies create awareness for new technologies. ENSC uses pull strategies like rebates and audits to encourage energy-efficient upgrades, targeting individuals and businesses already considering reducing their carbon footprint.
Stockholm, Sweden Agneta Persson, M.Sc. Tel: +48-(0)8 688 61 93 [email protected] Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 1 Demand-Side Management 1 The 2011 Programs 3 The 2011 Evaluation of DSM Programs 4 The 2011 Savings Verific...
AI summary The document outlines a DSM Savings Verification Report, covering various programs and evaluations from 2011, including appliance retirement, replacement, and energy efficiency initiatives. It includes a table of contents with sections on program evaluations and process discussion.
uation recommendation. It is grounded in the problems of personal and organizational interest and in the problem of appearances. We recommend that this recommendation not be implemented for 2012. - (1) This change is contrary to the way mo...
AI summary The recommendation against implementing the 2012 proposal is based on large firms' in-house expertise, simple measurement processes, and industrial practices. Efficiency Nova Scotia's oversight ensures effective program implementation, contrasting with residential sectors requiring third-party measurement.
(4) LED Holiday Light Exchange Program The lighting exchange is a seasonal program. One set of LED bulbs is exchanged for the trade in of two sets of older energy wasting bulbs. The addition of an interactive effects factor and adjustment...
AI summary The LED Holiday Light Exchange Program exchanges one set of LED bulbs for two sets of older, energy-inefficient bulbs. Adjustments for interactive effects, diversity, and line loss reduced evaluated savings below tracking levels, but the methods used for these adjustments are deemed appropriate.
(5) Low Income Renter Program (LIR) The Low Income Renter pilot program was started in 2011 in cooperation with municipal and provincial housing authorities in different locations in Nova Scotia. To be eligible to participate, a household...
AI summary The Low Income Renter (LIR) program, initiated in 2011, provides energy efficiency measures to eligible low-income renters in Nova Scotia. Measures include CFLs, LED lights, and insulation. Interactive effects were deemed negligible except for lighting, insulation, and hot water tank wraps. Econoler's recommendations to increase on-site validation and collect more data for precise savings evaluation are supported.
(6) Multi-Unit Residential Renter Program (MURR) This direct install pilot program was started in 2011. Measures installed through the program are the same set of low-cost measures as installed through the Low Income Renters Program (aerat...
AI summary The MURR program, initiated in 2011, uses low-cost measures like aerators and CFLs. Power bars were misused in some cases, prompting a recommendation to improve their proper use through better information. The program's effectiveness is evaluated, with a focus on sustainability and energy savings.
(7) Efficient Products – Direct Install Program (EP-DI) The Efficient Products – Direct Install Program provides business and multi-unit residential buildings with free installation of energy-efficient products. Measures include CFLs, LED...
AI summary The EP-DI program offers free energy-efficient product installations for businesses and multi-unit residential buildings, including LED lights, thermostats, and insulation. A pilot program (Retail LED Direct Install) was launched in 2011. Evaluation metrics like Net-to-Gross effect (0.95) and free ridership (15.4%) are discussed. Econoler recommends improving data collection through enhanced tracking sheets, site visits, and detailed technical information gathering for better savings accuracy.
(8) EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program The EnerGuide for Existing Houses program provides support to homeowners to reduce use of electrical energy and fuel consumption. Financial assistance for fuels other than electricity is provided b...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, supports homeowners in reducing energy use through measures like programmable thermostats and insulation. Due to data limitations, a 'true-up' analysis adjusted savings estimates by 25%. Econoler recommended improving data collection, refining HOT2000 models, and enhancing billing analysis to improve accuracy. The Province supports these recommendations.
(9) Fuel Substitution Pilot (Fuel) The Fuel Substitution Pilot was started in 2011. This program allows participants to substitute a non-electrical heat system or domestic hot water system for all or a portion of their current electric hea...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution Pilot, launched in 2011, allows participants to replace non-electrical heating systems with electric ones. Free-ridership was 42%, attributed to early pilot status and dealer-driven awareness (50% of clients). Econoler noted this, and the text supports two Evaluation recommendations.
(10) Low Income Program The Low Income Program serves low-income homeowner households with two categories of energy efficiency measures. Scope 1 measures concern the building envelope. Scope 2 measures are everything else including the usu...
AI summary The Low Income Program (LI) provides energy efficiency measures for low-income homeowners in Nova Scotia, divided into Scope 1 (building envelope) and Scope 2 (other measures, including appliances and water heating). Funding combines electricity and provincial sources. Efficiency Nova Scotia manages the program, collaborating with multiple departments. Evaluation recommendations include verifying prescriptive measure installations and reviewing HOT2000 models for accuracy.
(11) Performance Plus Program (PP) The Performance Plus Program is the residential new houses program. It provides financial incentives to homeowners and builders to exceed the energy efficiency requirements of the building code. Modeling...
AI summary The Performance Plus Program (PP) incentivizes residential new homes to exceed building code energy efficiency. Econoler adjusted EnerGuide baselines and savings estimates, citing studies. Free-ridership was 42%, with 5% market effect. Four recommendations include expanding builder interviews, integrating HOT2000 data, random model revisions, and tracking electric heating percentages for accurate EnerGuide calculations.
(12) Business Energy Rebates Program (BER) The Business Energy Rebates Program provides financial incentives, through prescriptive rebates, to businesses throughout Nova Scotia for the purchase of a wide range of qualified energy efficient...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates Program (BER) offers prescriptive rebates to Nova Scotia businesses for energy-efficient equipment, aiming to drive market transformation. Evaluation highlights 17.6% freeridership and a 0.83 Net-to-Gross ratio. Three recommendations are supported: improving tracking sheets, collecting detailed participant data, and increasing on-site visits for accurate savings estimation.
(13) Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) Smart Lighting Choices is an upstream lighting program that is designed to produce market transformation in the non-residential lighting sector by working through lighting distributors to buy down...
AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) is an upstream initiative reducing non-residential lighting costs via distributor incentives. It includes the Upstream Business Energy Rebates (BER) subprogram. Evaluation highlights 19% free-ridership, 0.81 Net-to-Gross, and -7.7% interactive effect. Recommendations include standardizing distributor invoices and conducting customer surveys to improve evaluation accuracy.
(15) Small Business Energy Solutions Program – SBES The Small Business Energy Solutions Program provides direct installation of energyefficient lighting retrofits to small businesses and includes small government, institutional and health...
AI summary The SBES program offers energy-efficient lighting retrofits to small businesses, with clients covering 20% of costs. Efficiency Nova Scotia funds 80%, and financing options are available. Evaluations recommend improving tracking sheets for better savings validation and collecting more data on heat sources and air conditioning use to enhance impact estimation accuracy.
Optimization of Lines 1 & 2 67,428 MWh/year Optimization of Line 3 Including Reject Screening 34,916 MWh/year Other Efficiency Measures 23,900 MWh/year It should be noted that the analysis of the plant's operational data was simply a "roug...
AI summary The document presents energy savings from various efficiency measures, noting that a rough check of plant operational data aligns with the Energy Performance Services multivariate regression model results, deeming them acceptable.
The evaluation review performed by the Evaluator on February 23, 2012, addressed several additional important questions related to plant performance and operations. Specifically, the majority of plant savings realized were associated with...
AI summary The evaluation review by the Evaluator on February 23, 2012, examined plant performance improvements, particularly the shift in operational loading from Line 2 to the more efficient Line 1. Savings were attributed to this shift, but not if outputs differed. The Econoler review confirmed these findings, aligning with international protocols. It is recommended to accept the savings and load reduction findings of 154.2 GWh and 17.8 MW.
IV. References Campbell, Donald T & Julian C. Stanley, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally College Publishing Company, 1963. Cook, Thomas D. & Donald T. Campbell, Quasi-Experimentation Designs &...
AI summary The references section lists academic and industry publications on research methodologies, demand-side management, and energy efficiency. Key works include studies on quasi-experimental designs, energy conservation, and measurement protocols, authored by experts like Donald T. Campbell, Clark W. Gellings, and Thomas D. Cook. The International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol (IPMVP) is cited as a key resource.
INTRODUCTION On May 19, 2010, a workshop was held by Nova Scotia Power's Demand Side Management team and a group of evaluation experts 1 to discuss a Nova-Scotia-based protocol for the assessment of free ridership, spillover and net-to-gro...
AI summary In 2010, Nova Scotia Power and experts discussed protocols for assessing free ridership, spillover, and net-to-gross (NTG) calculations. A 2011 order required Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) to submit a methodology document for free ridership and spillover calculations. This report, titled Net-to-Gross Evaluation Methodology , outlines ENSC's approach, aligning with workshop suggestions and addressing the board's order.
Selected Approach The methodology selected for assessing net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs) for Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs relies on the self-report approach (SRA). The SRA involves the analysis of responses to survey questions that are de...
AI summary The self-report approach (SRA) is selected to assess net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs) for Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy efficiency programs. SRA uses survey data to estimate program impacts and energy savings. It was chosen for its feasibility and cost-effectiveness over other methods like econometric and cross-sectional approaches discussed in a 2010 workshop. Organizations such as ScanAmerica and Navigant Consulting were involved in the workshop.
Table 1: Summary of the Distortion Effects Evaluated for Each Program Field Activities Distortion Effects Program Names P Survey N-P Survey Retailer/ Builder Interviews FR SO Market Effects Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement 90 0 0...
AI summary Table 1 summarizes the distortion effects evaluated for various energy efficiency programs, including data on survey responses and interviews conducted with retailers and builders. The table highlights programs such as Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement, EnerGuide for Existing Houses, and New Houses – Performance Plus, and indicates the presence of distortion effects such as FR, SO, and market effects.
1.2 Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement The Appliance Replacement program offers an incentive to multi-unit residential building owners for replacing old refrigerators with new ENERGY STAR qualified units. For the 2011 evaluation ye...
AI summary The Appliance Replacement program provides incentives for replacing old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR units in multi-unit residential buildings. Due to insufficient 2011 participants, no telephone survey was conducted to assess free-ridership or internal spillover effects, leading to unmeasured distortion impacts.
1.3 Efficient Products – Retail Markdown The Retail Markdown program provides retailer-level discounts to offset the cost of purchasing energy efficient products. CFLs, ENERGY STAR refrigerators and ENERGY STAR clothes washers provide a la...
AI summary The Retail Markdown program offers retailer discounts to offset costs of energy-efficient products like CFLs and ENERGY STAR appliances. Savings from these products are significant, and free-ridership is assessed using two approaches.
Market Effects Retail Markdown program discounts are offered during two distinct periods: in the spring and in the fall. Between these periods, eligible product sales may take place due to the program's intervention. The general population...
AI summary The Retail Markdown program offers discounts in spring and fall, assessing market penetration of three products (CFLs, ENERGY STAR refrigerators, and ENERGY STAR clothes washers) via surveys and retailer interviews to evaluate long-term market effects.
1.4 Efficient Products – Low-Income Renter The Low-Income Renter program was implemented in 2011. This program works with Community Services, local housing authorities, and landlords of low-income housing to offer free energy efficient upg...
AI summary The Low-Income Renter program (2011) partners with Community Services and local housing authorities to provide free energy upgrades for low-income tenants. The program assumes no distortion effects, resulting in a 100% Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR).
1.5 Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter The Multi-Unit Residential Renter program aims to educate and engage multi-unit property owners and tenants through events held in the lobby areas of selected multi-unit properties. Th...
AI summary The Multi-Unit Residential Renter program educates property owners and tenants through lobby events, promoting appliance retirement and installations of energy-efficient products like CFLs, power bars with timers, low-flow showerheads, and faucet aerators.
Free-Ridership Free-ridership is not being calculated for individual measures; rather, one overall level of free-ridership is being estimated for the program. Participants are considered to be free-riders when they declare they would still...
AI summary Free-ridership is estimated at the program level rather than for individual measures. Participants are considered free-riders if they would have implemented energy efficiency measures without the program's incentives, based on criteria like prior plans, timing, and discount influence.
Internal Spillover The participant survey is used to assess spillover. Participants are considered as contributing to spillover when they declare that they implemented eligible energy efficient measures on their own following their previou...
AI summary The participant survey assesses internal spillover by identifying if participants implemented energy-efficient measures independently after previous program participation. Additional questions gather details on the measure, implementation date, and program influence to quantify spillover.
1.6 Efficient Products – LED Holiday Light Exchange Program Each fall since 2005, the LED Holiday Light Exchange program has given the opportunity for Nova Scotians to exchange two sets of old holiday lights for one new set of LED holiday...
AI summary The LED Holiday Light Exchange Program, active since 2005, allows Nova Scotians to exchange old holiday lights for LED sets. Due to its small scale and lack of participant tracking, no distortion effects are measured for this program.
1.7 Existing Houses – EnerGuide for Existing Houses The EnerGuide for Existing Houses program fosters energy efficiency improvements in existing houses. A certified energy advisor performs a comprehensive examination of the house and provi...
AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Houses program promotes energy efficiency improvements in existing homes through certified energy advisors who conduct comprehensive house examinations. The program aims to enhance residential energy performance and reduce consumption.
2011 DSM Program Evaluation Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Net-to-Gross Evaluation Methodology the owner with a list of possible efficiency upgrades. After upgrades are implemented, a final EnerGuide rating is established by a follow u...
AI summary The 2011 DSM Program Evaluation in Nova Scotia uses a Net-to-Gross methodology where homeowners receive rebates based on EnerGuide rating improvements after implementing efficiency upgrades, verified by follow-up audits.
Free-Ridership The free-ridership level for this program is measured through questions included in a participant survey. Participants are considered to be free-riders when they declare they would have implemented the energy efficiency upgr...
AI summary Free-ridership is measured via participant surveys assessing whether energy efficiency upgrades would have been implemented without the program. Criteria include prior planning, number of upgrades, timing, and program influence on decisions.
Internal Spillover A participant survey is used to assess spillover. Internal spillover occurs when participants declare that, following their participation in the program, they implemented additional energy efficiency upgrades of the type...
AI summary The document describes a participant survey method to assess internal spillover in energy efficiency programs. Internal spillover refers to participants implementing additional energy efficiency upgrades post-program, influenced by their initial program participation. The survey quantifies spillover by identifying upgrades, implementation dates, and the program's influence on decisions.
1.9 Low-Income Homeowner The Low-Income Homeowner program offers various energy efficiency measures to low-income homeowners. The measures targeted are building envelope upgrades as well as the installation of programmable thermostats, CFL...
AI summary The Low-Income Homeowner program provides energy efficiency measures such as building envelope upgrades and programmable thermostats. It assumes no significant distortion effects, leading to a net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) of 100%.
1.10 New Houses – Performance Plus The Performance Plus program encourages builders and homeowners to make better energy efficiency choices for their new house. Rebates are based on the final EnerGuide rating of the house and on energy eff...
AI summary The Performance Plus program incentivizes energy efficiency in new homes through rebates tied to final EnerGuide ratings and energy-efficient product installations, encouraging builders and homeowners to adopt higher efficiency standards.
Free-Ridership The free-ridership level for this program is measured through questions included in a participant survey and in-depth builder interviews. A question is included in the participant survey that determines whether the decision...
AI summary The free-ridership level for the program is assessed via participant surveys and builder interviews. Homeowners are classified as free-riders if they indicate they would have achieved similar energy efficiency without the program. Criteria include building timelines, energy efficiency levels, and program influence on decisions.
Market Effects The marketing of the Performance Plus program is designed so that builders receive promotion and awareness documents on various energy efficiency measures. Consequently, market effects can occur when a builder decides to ins...
AI summary The Performance Plus program's marketing may influence builders to adopt high-efficiency equipment in new homes even without program participation. Market effects are assessed through builder interviews to evaluate how program promotions impact design decisions.
2 COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL PROGRAMS
AI summary The section outlines regulatory considerations for commercial and industrial programs, including demand-side management (DSM) and net-to-gross (NTG) metrics. Key focus areas involve program design, efficiency targets, and compliance with NTGR benchmarks for energy usage.
2.1 Efficient Products – Commercial Direct Install The Direct Install program manages the installation of efficient products such as CFLs, LED exit signs and programmable thermostats in Nova Scotia businesses.
AI summary The Direct Install program oversees the installation of energy-efficient products like CFLs, LED exit signs, and programmable thermostats in Nova Scotia businesses, aiming to promote commercial energy efficiency through direct product deployment.
2.2 Prescriptive Retrofit – Business Energy Rebates The Business Energy Rebates program offers incentives and financing for energy efficient equipment, including lighting, refrigeration, compressed air, HVAC, high efficiency motors and var...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates program provides incentives and financing for energy-efficient equipment in Nova Scotia, including lighting, refrigeration, HVAC, and motors. It aims to support businesses in adopting technologies that reduce energy consumption.
2.4 Custom – Retrofit and New Construction The Custom program offers incentives and financing for energy efficient equipment including compressed air, industrial processes, refrigeration, motors, lighting and other electrical end-uses. The...
AI summary The Custom program provides incentives and financing for energy-efficient equipment in sectors like industrial processes and lighting. Participation requires a feasibility study and a measurement and verification (M&V) plan. Free-ridership is anticipated to be low due to these process requirements.
Free-Ridership A telephone survey is used to evaluate the potential free-ridership level. Participants are considered to be free-riders when they declare they would have implemented the efficiency measures without the incentive offered thr...
AI summary A telephone survey assesses free-ridership by identifying participants who would have implemented energy efficiency measures without program incentives. Key questions focus on whether measures would have been taken independently and if the program influenced decisions.
2.5 Small Business Energy Solutions The Small Business Energy Solutions program offers installation services, incentives and financing for businesses to install various energy efficient products.
AI summary The Small Business Energy Solutions program provides installation services, incentives, and financing to help businesses in Nova Scotia adopt energy-efficient products. The initiative aims to support small businesses in reducing energy consumption through accessible solutions.
Residential Programs - ›Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement & Replacement - ›Efficient Products – Retail Markdown - ›Efficient Products – Low-Income Direct Install - ›Efficient Products – Multi-Unit Residential Renter - ›Efficient Pr...
AI summary The document outlines residential energy efficiency programs, including appliance replacement, low-income initiatives, and home performance upgrades. Programs focus on efficient products, fuel substitution, and new/existing house performance standards.
Measured through: O Participant surveys EP – Appliance Retirement 90 0 0 0 0 EP – Appliance Replacement 0 0 1 EP – Retail Markdown 70 70 5 ⊙&∆ Δ&□ LED Holiday Light Exchange 0 0 0 EP – Low-Income Direct Install 70 0 0 EP – Multi-Unit Resid...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on various energy efficiency programs, measured through participant surveys. It includes metrics such as the number of participants and program-specific outcomes, indicating the scope and reach of different initiatives.
EP – MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL RENTER - › Free-ridership will be measured through participant surveys. - › Participants will be considered as FR when they declare that they would still have implemented the energy-efficient measures if the pro...
AI summary The document outlines a methodology to measure free-ridership (FR) in the EP – MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL RENTER program. FR is defined as participants who would have implemented energy-efficient measures regardless of the program. Criteria include pre-program planning, number of measures, timing, and influence of the discount.
EXISTING HOUSES – ENERGUIDE - › Free-ridership will be measured through participant surveys. - › Participants will be considered as FR when they declare that they would have implemented the energy efficiency upgrades anyway. - › The level...
AI summary The document outlines methods to measure free-ridership (FR) in energy efficiency programs through participant surveys. FR is identified if participants claim they would have implemented upgrades independently, using criteria like prior planning, number of upgrades, timing, and program influence on decisions.
CUSTOM - › Free-ridership will be measured through participant surveys. - › FR for this program is expected to be low, considering the process requirement. - › Participants will be considered as FR when they declare that they would have im...
AI summary The program measures free-ridership (FR) via participant surveys, expecting low FR due to process requirements. Participants are classified as FR if they would have implemented energy efficiency measures without the rebate. FR determination involves three criteria: implementation intent, timing, and program influence.
SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY SOLUTIONS - › Spillover will be measured through participant surveys. - › Participants will be considered as SO when they declare that they bought and installed additional efficient lighting products following their p...
AI summary The program measures spillover (SO) through participant surveys, identifying SO when participants purchase additional efficient lighting. Quantification involves product type, purchase date, and program influence. Follow-up calls confirm declarations and collect product details.
5 Response IR-1: Acronym Definition RUL Remaining Useful Life SBES Small Business Energy Solutions SEP Superior Energy Performance SLC Smart Lighting Choices TRC Total Resource Cost UARB Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board WETT Wood Energ...
AI summary The response to IR-2 discusses variances in spending and savings for DSM programs. The Low Income Households program exceeded its budget and energy target due to increased participation, while the Small Business Direct Install program exceeded its energy target due to program improvements. EnerGuide for Existing Houses had a significant spending variance below budget.
\ Not applicable: a customer may install multiple measures. A В C Estimated Total Number of Participation 2014 Eligible Customers Units/Participants/ Facilities (C=B/A) Efficient Products Rebates (Residential) 455,000 142,047 (U) N/A Exist...
AI summary The table presents participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and BNI (Business, Non-profit and Institutional) initiatives. It highlights the number of eligible customers, participants, and participation rates for different programs such as Efficient Products Rebates, Home Energy Reports, and Custom Incentives.
1 A B C 2011 Estimated Total Eligible Customers Number of Units/Participants/ Facilities Participation Rate (C=B/A) Efficient Products - Residential 440,000 341,237 (U) N/A Existing Houses 330,000 1,540 (P) 0.5% Low Income2 55,000 10,023 (...
AI summary The table presents participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, highlighting the number of eligible customers, participants, and participation rates for residential and commercial programs. The data includes low-income and new housing initiatives, as well as direct installation and rebate programs.
3 A B C 2012(F) Estimated Total Eligible Customers Number of Units/Participants/ Facilities Participation Rate (C=B/A) Efficient Products 440,000 300,000 (U) N/A Existing Houses3 385,000 21,000 (P) 5.5% New Houses 3,000 900 (P) 30% Home En...
AI summary The table presents participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, showing the number of eligible customers, participants, and participation rates for programs such as Efficient Products, Home Energy Report, and Small Business Direct Install.
2010 Prescriptive (U) Custom (F) Small Business Energy Solutions (F) Efficient Products - Direct Install (F) Residential/Charitable - 19 108 2,079 Small General 1 7 245 1,605 General Demand 153,382 49 420 1,427 Large General 148,584 3 - 49...
AI summary The text presents data on energy usage and programs related to energy efficiency, including residential, commercial, and industrial categories, with a focus on rebates and energy solutions in Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2012.
DSM Technical Tables Residential Table # Measure Name Peak Demand First Tear Energy I Otal Avoided Cost TRC rotarnet Resource Peak Demand Energy I Otal Avoided Cost TRC rotarnet Resource Peak Demand First fear Energy ι οται Avoided Cost TR...
AI summary The DSM Technical Tables present data on demand-side management measures, including savings, energy usage, costs, and benefits for various residential energy efficiency programs. The tables compare different years and metrics such as total avoided cost and TRC (Total Resource Cost) ratios.
- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-10: a) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 1, filed electronically. b) Over the three-year plan, no program areas fail the TRC test. The New Residential, Existing Residential and Energy Savings Actions prog...
AI summary The document discusses the TRC (Technology Readiness Curve) test results for several energy efficiency programs, noting that none failed the test. It highlights the New Residential program's strategic benefits, including market transformation and trade ally capacity building. ENSC acknowledges that its current TRC calculation method is conservative and may need updating, citing examples from other jurisdictions.
21 With DSM Case No DSM Case Manuals 150,000 0.25 0.75 Strategy Development work, including research into emerging electrical energy efficiency technologies and learning from 75,000 results and activities in other jurisdictions results and...
AI summary The text presents a table comparing costs associated with a DSM case versus a no DSM case, including items like manuals, strategy development, data system maintenance, and innovative financing. It also mentions capacity building initiatives, working with governments on codes and standards, and enabling strategies aimed at education and outreach, including green schools and corporate communications.
23 c) The potential loss of significant load would be reflected in NSPI's avoided costs. Please 24 refer to Multeese IR-6 and Synapse IR-14. 1 Request IR-17: New Energy Rating System 50 $25,000 $8,000 New Energy Rating Software 25 $12,000...
AI summary The text discusses the potential loss of significant load and its impact on NSPI's avoided costs, referencing specific reports (Multeese IR-6 and Synapse IR-14). It also includes a detailed table outlining various programs, training initiatives, and associated costs related to energy efficiency and infrastructure.
6 Acronym Definition 29 sudden cancellation of the complementing federal incentive program, which affected 30 overall spending and energy savings. The budget variance was greater than the energy 1 variance, as more cost-effective savings w...
AI summary The Performance Plus (New Houses) program and C&I Custom and Prescriptive programs experienced budget and savings variances due to insufficient market demand in early 2011. Efforts to address these issues included increasing internal sales and marketing capacity, targeting vertical market segments, and launching the 'Embedded Energy Manager' program in 2011.
A В С Estimated Number of Participation Total Eligible Units/Participants/ Rate 2008-2009 Customers Facilities (C=B/A) Efficient Products - Residential 440,000 93,324 (U) N/A Existing Houses 330,000 520 (P) 0.2% Low Income 55,000 521 (P) 0...
AI summary The table presents participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and commercial initiatives, with estimated numbers of eligible customers and participants, as well as participation rates for each category.
d) A В С 2010 Estimated Total Eligible Customers Number of Units/Participants/ Facilities Participation Rate (C=B/A) Efficient Products - Residential 440,000 205,916 (U) N/A Existing Houses 330,000 1,516 (P) 0.5% Low Income 55,000 680 (P)...
AI summary The tables provide data on participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012. The data includes estimated eligible customers, the number of units or participants, and participation rates for different program categories such as residential, existing and new houses, low-income, and small business initiatives.
DSM Technical Tables Residential Table # Page # Existing Homes CFL - Dimmable - 19 W 0.8 6.8 $2,701 $3,849 -$1,148 0.7 0.9 7.0 $3,107 $3,981 -$874 0.8 0.9 7.2 $3,520 $4,114 -$594 0.9 Energy Star Decorative CFL Lamps- Chandelier (5 W) 0.0 0...
AI summary The document presents technical tables detailing residential demand-side management (DSM) programs, including various energy efficiency measures such as CFLs, power bars, showerheads, and thermostats, with data on costs, savings, and performance metrics.
Table 2.2: Residential Existing Homes (Excluding Low Income, Including MURB) Program Results by Measure Table 2.2: ResidentialExisting Homes (Excluding Low Income, Including MURB)Program Results by Measure For Plan Year 2013 For Plan Year...
AI summary Table 2.2 presents program results for residential existing homes (excluding low income, including MURB) by measure for the years 2013 to 2015. It includes data on demand savings, energy savings, costs, and total net benefits for various measures, such as CFL - Dimmable - 19 W.
Table 2.6: Residential MURB Only Program Results by Measure For Plan Year 2013 For Plan Year 2014 For Plan Year 2015 A B C Total D E = C - D F = C / D A B C Total D E = C - D F = C / D A B C Total D E = C - D F = C / D Measure Name savings...
AI summary This table presents the results of residential energy efficiency programs for multi-unit residential buildings (MURB) for the years 2013 to 2015. It includes metrics such as peak demand savings, energy savings, avoided costs, and total net resource benefits for specific measures like screw-in CFLs and LED bulbs.
Table 3: Residential New Construction Program Results by Measure For Plan Year 2013 For Plan Year 2014 For Plan Year 2015 Faucet Aerator Base 2.2GPM, efficient 1.5 GPM (all faucet aerators in home replaced) 2.7 14.3 $10,713 $3,244 $7,469 3...
AI summary Table 3 provides program results for residential new construction in Nova Scotia for the years 2013 to 2015, detailing measures such as faucet aerators, programmable thermostats, heat pumps, and pellet stoves. The table includes metrics such as the number of units, costs, and savings for each measure.
2 1 - 3 The benefits of the programs are shown in terms of energy savings (GWh) and demand - 4 savings (MW), but the dollar Lifetime Benefits are shown as a single number ($million, - 5 second column). Please provide ENSC Evidence, Tables...
AI summary The request asks for separate lifetime benefits for energy and demand savings from ENSC programs, currently shown as a single figure. The response refers to ENSC Evidence, Figures 4.1 to 4.4, which provide the requested data.
Figure 4.3 2014 Energy Lifetime Benefits ($ million) Demand Lifetime Benefits ($ million) RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRAMS Efficient Product Rebates 9.9 0.1 Existing Residential 17.7 2.2 New Residential 9.1 1.3 Energy Savings Actions 1.0 0.0 BUSIN...
AI summary Figure 4.3 presents the energy and demand lifetime benefits of various DSM programs in Nova Scotia from 2014, measured in 2013 dollars. Residential and business programs show significant energy savings, with total energy benefits of $108.3 million and demand benefits of $7.7 million.
1 Request IR-13: 2 Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.23, lines 4-5, states that "...[C]onservation and energy efficiency [are] a lower-cost alternative to new supply". 5 6 a) What assumptions were made about NSPI's need for new supply? 7 8 b) Wh...
AI summary Request IR-13 asks about assumptions regarding NSPI's need for new supply and its forecast reserve margin from 2012 to 2017. The response directs to a table showing supply-side additions under DSM and No DSM scenarios and provides reserve margin data indicating it met the minimum requirement of 20%.
21 With DSM Case No DSM Case 2012 23% 22% 2013 24% 21% 2014 27% 23% 2015 28% 24% 2016 29% 23% 2017 30% 24% 1 Request IR-14: 2 3 Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.32, Recommendation #2, lines 11 – 14, 4 5 a) Please provide details of the specific...
AI summary The document discusses a request (IR-14) related to the Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and its enabling strategies in 2013, including budget allocations for education and outreach, development and research, and other enabling strategies. It also asks for details on how customer classes are identified for cost allocation and any strategies that cannot be directly allocated.
Other Trade Ally Network - Development of a Trade Ally Network will benefit all rate classes. It is anticipated that the residential sector will make up about 70% of the users of the network. Through the Trade Ally Network, residential cus...
AI summary The development of a Trade Ally Network is expected to benefit all rate classes, with residential customers making up about 70% of users. Businesses will also benefit by accessing information on trained professionals and by partnering with ENSC to promote energy efficiency products and services, comprising about 30% of the network.
27 o Building Energy Estimation Business Sector 28 o Refrigeration Compressors Business Sector 29 o Air Compressor Systems Business Sector 30 o Refrigerators/Freezers Residential Sector 1 o Clothes Washers Residential Sector 2 o Small Netw...
AI summary The document outlines various sectors and categories of energy-related equipment and discusses the allocation of expenditures for Enabling Strategies, noting that ENSC will adjust cost assignments based on program needs. It also references a request and response related to the funding of DSM programs outside the Electricity DSM Fund.
Trade Ally Training Programs -2014 Type of Training Specific Program Estimated Number of Participants Entire Cost ENSC Cost Totals $405,000 $405,000 NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-18: 2 3 Reference: 4.5 Working with Governments (Appendix A,...
AI summary The document references a request for information (IR-18) related to studies and evaluations under the Codes and Standards projects, specifically asking for project details, costs, and potential funding sources. It also mentions the Steering Committee on Performance Energy Efficiency and Renewables (SCOPEER), which oversees the creation and updating of national energy efficiency standards.
24 1 The funding for the national market study on fenestration is shared with the Nova Scotia 4 Program costs incurred on participating rate classes 5 Program Existing Homes New Homes Efficient Products Home Energy Report Prescriptive Cust...
AI summary The text presents a table listing program costs incurred on participating rate classes for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2015. The table includes data for different program categories such as existing homes, new homes, efficient products, and others. The percentages indicate the share of program costs for each category and year.
5 2013 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million)a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)b Program Administrator Cost Test (...
AI summary The table presents data on residential sub-programs under the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including investment, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests. The data is expressed in 2013 dollars and includes various sub-programs such as Low Income, Direct Install, and Green Heat.
Green Heating Systems initiative in 2013. In the field of heating systems, - then, it will have taken four years to move from a desire for a one-year pilot to implementation - of the ensuing program. - Within a three-year approval cycle, i...
AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative faced delays in implementation, with ENSC suggesting a more dynamic approach within a three-year approval cycle could have led to earlier implementation and faster realization of energy savings, particularly with advancements in ductless heat pump technology.
One factor influencing the residential forecast involves market effects including the price of electricity versus other alternatives (e.g. fuel oil) and the effects of natural gas distribution. The stock of electric appliances is estimated...
AI summary The residential electricity forecast considers market effects such as electricity versus fuel oil prices and natural gas distribution. Technology factors and appliance efficiency are also considered. Commercial and industrial electricity sales are influenced by economic factors and large industries.
Total Sales 16 15 - 17 Given the combined activities of each sector, including large industrial shutdowns, expansions, - etc., total sales grew at an average annual rate of 1.0 percent over the 5 years ending 2008, but - 19 then had a 3.6...
AI summary Total sales in Nova Scotia grew at 1.0% annually from 2004-2008 but fell 3.6% in 2009 due to economic slowdown. Forecasts show a 1.3% annual decline over 2011-2021 due to energy conservation, compared to 0.8% without conservation programs. Billed sales are projected to drop from 11,840 GWh (2011) to 10,430 GWh (2021).
Figure 13 Total Energy Requirement Year With future DSM Net System Requirement GWh Growth Rate % Without future DSM Net System Requirement GWh Growth Rate % 2001 11,303 0.6 11,303 11.5 2002 11,501 1.8 11,501 1.8 2003 12,009 4.4 12,009 4.4...
AI summary The table and text present the Net System Requirement (NSR) in Nova Scotia from 2001 to 2021F, showing how DSM impacts energy demand. NSR grew at 0.9% annually from 2003-2008 but declined by 3.7% in 2009 due to the recession. With DSM, NSR is projected to decline by 1.3% over the next decade, while without DSM, it would grow by 1.1% annually.
Unmetered Services 21 20 - 22 This class is comprised of street and area lighting, as well as miscellaneous lighting and small - 23 loads. In 2010, unmetered sales represented approximately 1.0 percent of total Nova Scotia - 24 Power sales...
AI summary Unmetered services include street and area lighting, comprising 1.0% of Nova Scotia Power sales in 2010. A 2012 LED street light relamping project is projected to save 4 GWh annually in the first year and 44 GWh total over five years, reducing energy use.
Energy Forecast without Future DSM Program Effects 2 3 Year Residential Sector Growth Commercial Sector Growth Industrial Sector Growth Total Sales Growth Losses Total Energy Growth GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh GWh % 1994 3,498 0.4 2,660 1....
AI summary The document presents a historical energy forecast table without the effects of future Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, showing energy consumption growth across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors from 1994 to 2021, along with total energy sales and losses.
Annual Net System Peak (Winter-ending) Over the longer term, Net System Peak is forecast to decrease from 2,192 MW in winter 2007/08, to 1,888 MW in 2019, which represents an average annual decline of 1.2 percent. The declining growth rate...
AI summary The document discusses the forecasted decline in Annual Net System Peak (Winter-ending) from 2,192 MW in 2007/08 to 1,888 MW in 2019, attributed to conservation and energy efficiency programs. The 2008 peak demand was 2,192 MW, lower than the 2004 record due to reduced industrial load and warmer temperatures.
One factor influencing the residential forecast involves market effects including the price of electricity versus other alternatives (e.g. fuel oil) and the effects of natural gas distribution. The stock of electric appliances is estimated...
AI summary The residential electricity forecast considers market effects like electricity versus fuel oil prices and natural gas distribution impacts. Commercial electricity sales are linked to GDP and economic activity, while industrial use is influenced by large industries and economic fluctuations.
1 result, the effect on the overall system load is very gradual as older appliances are retired and 2 replaced with more efficient models. 3 4 With the rapidly rising oil prices and increasing concerns over hazardous oil spills, the market...
AI summary The text discusses the gradual reduction in overall system load as older appliances are replaced with more efficient models. It also mentions the increasing use of electric space heating due to rising oil prices and concerns over oil spills, along with forecasts based on heating degree-days (HDD) and residential load growth rates.
Municipal 956 GWh, or 8.2 percent of energy sales. 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 This class comprises municipal utilities that purchase wholesale electricity from NSPI and distribute it within their own service territories. The six municipalit...
AI summary This section discusses municipal utilities in Nova Scotia that purchase electricity from NSPI and distribute it within their territories. It outlines the six municipalities involved, the sectors they serve, and the impact of energy losses. It also mentions the availability of an Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) and forecasts for municipal sales.
Peak Demand The Total System Peak is defined as the highest single hourly average demand experienced in a year. It includes both firm and interruptible loads and due to the weather-sensitive load component in Nova Scotia, the Total System...
AI summary The Total System Peak is the highest hourly demand in a year, influenced by weather and industrial loads. The 2007/2008 peak of 2,192 MW occurred at -14°C, 46 MW less than 2004. Forecasting uses historical load factors and DSM, reducing peak growth to 1.3% annually. The 2009 peak is forecast at 2,214 MW, with long-term declines due to conservation.
Forecast Model for DOMENG Regression(5 regressors, 0 lagged errors) Term Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Significance AIDX 323.774438 53.421556 6.060745 0.999998 CUSTHDD 0.250221 0.038338 6.526670 0.99999 RRCGOODS 0.107744 0.014962 7.20...
AI summary The document presents a regression model for forecasting DOMENG (Domestic Energy) with five regressors, including AIDX, CUSTHDD, RRCGOODS, RREP, and DOMENG1. All coefficients are statistically significant, indicating strong relationships between the variables and domestic energy consumption.
Energy Forecast without Conservation and DSM Program Effects Residential 0 11 Commercial 0 11 Industrial Total 0 11 Total 0 11 Year Sector Growth Sector Growth Sector Growth Sales Growth Losses Energy Growth GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh GWh...
AI summary The document presents an energy forecast table showing electricity consumption growth across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors in Nova Scotia from 1994 to 2019, excluding the effects of conservation and Demand Side Management (DSM) programs. The data includes energy sales, growth percentages, and losses for each year.
High and Low Forecast Scenarios Low Forecast Scenario Assumptions 1 Major Paper Mill Closure (- 1,700 GWh /yr from 2010 onward) 2 Economic Growth Diminishes (Base case growth rate decreases by 50%) 3 30% reduction in home heating oil price...
AI summary The document outlines high and low forecast scenarios for energy demand, considering factors like economic growth, industrial activity, heating oil prices, and the impact of demand-side management (DSM) programs. It also provides numerical projections for Net System Requirement (NSR) and peak demand (MW) from 2009 to 2019.
Residential Sector Sales Residential energy sales are forecast using the same models and assumptions as described in the 2006 NSPI Load Forecast report. For the IRP forecast period beyond 2015 shown in the Load Forecast Report, the followi...
AI summary Residential energy sales are forecasted using models from the 2006 NSPI Load Forecast report, with assumptions based on economic data, heating oil prices, and electricity price trends. The forecast assumes rising electric space heating adoption and limited natural gas distribution, projecting residential load growth to 2029.
Table 2: Annual Commercial Sector Sales Year GWh Growth Year GWh Growth 2000(actual) 2,829 2.3% 2015 3,933 1.8% 2001(actual) 2,959 4.6% 2016 3,999 1.7% 2002(actual) 2,996 1.3% 2017 4,066 1.7% 2003(actual) 3,091 3.1% 2018 4,132 1.6% 2004(ac...
AI summary Table 2 presents annual commercial sector sales in GWh from 2000 to 2029, showing consistent growth rates over the years, with GWh increasing from 2,829 in 2000 to 4,894 in 2029.
Request IR-8: Please provide ENSC's views on whether experience with DSM in Nova Scotia since the 2007 indicates that the forecast level of savings in the 2007 IRP cannot be can be achieved at the projected costs in the 2007 IRP. Response...
AI summary The document contains responses from ENSC to various requests regarding the 2007 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), the 2013-2015 DSM Plan, and the evaluation of Energy Savings Actions. ENSC refers to Synapse IR-12 for views on DSM savings, suggests an IRP update by 2013, explains the development of the DSM plan through consultation, clarifies the exclusion of solar domestic water heating, and outlines plans for third-party evaluation of savings programs.
- 10 numbers refer to the numbers as listed in Appendix I of each evaluation report. Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement ARet 5: Facilitate tracking of savings by using adjusted unitary savings values. All tracking sheet recommendati...
AI summary The document outlines actions taken by ENSC related to the Efficient Products program, including implementing tracking sheet recommendations, standardizing entries, conducting on-site metering for specific appliances, and improving visibility of discounted products. The Appliance Replacement program is not being offered in 2012.
1 Request IR-19: 2 3 Is ENSC planning to include evaluation of Enabling Strategies in future third part 4 program evaluations and, if not, why not? 5 6 Response IR-19: 7 8 ENSC plans to include third-party evaluation of Enabling Strategies...
AI summary ENSC plans to include third-party evaluations for Enabling Strategies that claim energy savings, such as Codes and Standards, but not for those that do not claim savings, as their purpose is to encourage energy-efficient behaviors and increase participation in existing programs already evaluated.
Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-21 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-22: 2 3 Please provide as detailed and realistic as possible an example of the allocation of costs 4 between taxpayer and ratepayer components, based on the proposed budget...
AI summary The document requests detailed examples of cost allocation between taxpayer and ratepayer components based on the 2013 budget or anticipated program activity. It provides three examples, including direct program costs, administrative overhead, and general program administration.
Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-23 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-23: 23 24 b) Please refer to part a. 25 26 c) Please refer to part a. 1 Request IR-27: 2 3 The bill-impact tables in Appendix C, Attachment 3, do not appear to reflect eithe...
AI summary The text discusses a request (IR-27) regarding the accuracy of bill-impact tables in Appendix C, Attachment 3, and the inclusion of energy-efficiency program benefits. NSPI responds that DSM impacts are already included in the load forecast and that billing determinants reflect savings from DSM programs.
3 2013 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Program Administrator Cost Test...
AI summary The table presents investment and benefit data for various energy efficiency programs in 2013, including investments, lifetime benefits, energy and demand savings, and cost tests for each program. The data is expressed in 2013 dollars and includes programs such as Low Income, Direct Install, and Green Heat.
4 2014 Investment ($ million) Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh) Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings at Generator (MW) Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) b Program Administrator Cost Test...
AI summary The table presents investment and benefit data for various residential energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including Low Income, Direct Install, Existing Homes, Green Heat, and MURB, with metrics such as lifetime benefits, energy savings, and cost tests.
New load forecasting methodology under development at NSPI A review of NSPI's load forecasting methodology in 2008 recognized that load forecasting could be enhanced with better integration of DSM savings by adopting an end-use model frame...
AI summary NSPI is updating its load forecasting methodology to incorporate a Statistically-Adjusted End-use (SAE) model, which will improve the integration of Demand Side Management (DSM) savings and provide more detailed analysis of end-use types and efficiency trends.
One factor influencing the residential forecast involves market effects including the price of electricity versus other alternatives (e.g. fuel oil) and the effects of natural gas distribution. The stock of electric appliances is estimated...
AI summary The residential electricity forecast considers market effects, fuel prices, and appliance stock changes. Natural gas distribution is expected to have a limited impact. Commercial and industrial electricity sales are tied to economic factors and large industries, with fluctuations influenced by external conditions.
Total Sales 16 15 - 17 Given the combined activities of each sector, including large industrial shutdowns, expansions, - etc., total sales grew at an average annual rate of 1.0 percent over the 5 years ending 2008, but - 19 then had a 3.6...
AI summary Total sales in Nova Scotia grew at 1.0% annually from 2003–2008 but dropped 3.6% in 2009 due to economic slowdown. Over the 10-year forecast period, sales are expected to decline at 1.3% annually with conservation programs, versus 0.8% without them. Billed sales are projected to fall from 11,840 GWh (2011) to 10,430 GWh (2021).
Unmetered Services 21 20 - 22 This class is comprised of street and area lighting, as well as miscellaneous lighting and small - 23 loads. In 2010, unmetered sales represented approximately 1.0 percent of total Nova Scotia - 24 Power sales...
AI summary The unmetered services class includes street and area lighting, comprising ~1.0% of NSPI's 2010 sales. A 2012-2017 LED street light relamping project aims to save 4 GWh in the first year and 44 GWh annually over five years.
Peak Demand 13 14 15 16 17 The total system peak is defined as the highest single hourly average demand experienced in a year. It includes both firm and interruptible loads and due to the weather-sensitive load component in Nova Scotia, th...
AI summary The document defines total system peak demand as the highest hourly average demand in a year, influenced by weather and customer behavior. It notes that NSPI and ELI-2P-RTP customers can reduce peak loads through interruptions or price responses. Historical data shows a 2009/2010 peak of 2,114 MW, lower than the 2004 peak. Forecasting methods use load factors and DSM programs, projecting a 1.5% annual decline in peak demand by 2021 due to conservation efforts.
Energy Forecast without Future DSM Program Effects 2 3 Year Residential Sector Growth Commercial Sector Growth Industrial Sector Growth Total Sales Growth Losses Total Energy Growth GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh GWh % 1994 3,498 0.4 2,660 1....
AI summary The document presents an energy forecast table without the effects of future Demand Side Management (DSM) programs. It outlines historical energy consumption data across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors from 1994 to 2021, including growth rates and total energy sales.
Annual Net System Peak (Winter-ending) Over the longer term, Net System Peak is forecast to decrease from 2,192 MW in winter 2007/08, to 1,888 MW in 2019, which represents an average annual decline of 1.2 percent. The declining growth rate...
AI summary The Annual Net System Peak (Winter-ending) is projected to decrease from 2,192 MW in 2007/08 to 1,888 MW in 2019, driven by conservation and energy efficiency programs. The decline is attributed to reduced industrial load and warmer temperatures compared to the 2004 peak of 2,238 MW.
One factor influencing the residential forecast involves market effects including the price of electricity versus other alternatives (e.g. fuel oil) and the effects of natural gas distribution. The stock of electric appliances is estimated...
AI summary The residential electricity forecast considers factors like the price of electricity compared to alternatives, appliance saturation, and natural gas distribution. Commercial and industrial electricity sales are linked to economic indicators such as GDP and consumer confidence, with large industries like forestry and pulp & paper significantly influencing the industrial sector forecast.
Figure 5 Persons per Residential Account With an ever-increasing array of new technology available, usage per customer continues to grow, despite efficiency improvements for many household appliances. Larger appliances are modeled individu...
AI summary The text discusses increasing residential energy usage despite efficiency improvements in appliances like TVs, dishwashers, and electric ranges, with specific annual efficiency forecasts (0.5% for most appliances, 1% for electric ranges). These improvements apply only to new appliances, while overall usage per customer continues to grow.
1 result, the effect on the overall system load is very gradual as older appliances are retired and 2 replaced with more efficient models. 3 4 With the rapidly rising oil prices and increasing concerns over hazardous oil spills, the market...
AI summary The document discusses the gradual effect on system load as older appliances are replaced with more efficient models, and notes the increasing market share of electric space heat due to rising oil prices and concerns over oil spills. It also provides details on heating degree-days (HDD) used for weather forecasting and mentions residential sector load growth rates.
Energy Forecast with Conservation and DSM Program Effects Year Residential Sector Growth Commercial Sector Growth Industrial Sector Growth Total Sales Growth Losses Total Energy Growth GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh % GWh GWh % 1994 3,498 0.4 2,660...
AI summary The document presents a historical energy forecast table, showing energy usage (in GWh) and growth percentages across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors in Nova Scotia from 1994 to 2019. It highlights fluctuations in energy demand, with notable increases and decreases in specific years, particularly in the industrial sector.
High and Low Forecast Scenarios Low Low Forecast Scenario Assumptions 1 Major Paper Mill Closure (- 1,700 GWh /yr from 2010 onward) 2 Economic Growth Diminishes (Base case growth rate decreases by 50%) 3 30% reduction in home heating oil p...
AI summary This document outlines high and low forecast scenarios for energy demand in Nova Scotia, considering factors such as economic growth, industrial activity, heating oil prices, and the impact of demand-side management (DSM) programs. It includes assumptions and projected values for Net System Requirement (NSR) and peak demand across various years.
Residential Sector Sales Residential energy sales are forecast using the same models and assumptions as described in the 2006 NSPI Load Forecast report. For the IRP forecast period beyond 2015 shown in the Load Forecast Report, the followi...
AI summary Residential energy sales are forecast using models from the 2006 NSPI Load Forecast report, with assumptions including economic data from the Conference Board of Canada, heating oil price escalation, and rising electric space heating adoption. The forecast extends to 2029, with load growth projected at 2.2% after 2025.
Table 4: Annual Net System Requirement Year GWh Growth Year GWh Growth 2000(actual) 11,240 3.4% 2015 15,028 1.7% 2001(actual) 11,303 0.6% 2016 15,265 1.6% 2002(actual) 11,501 1.8% 2017 15,506 1.6% 2003(actual) 12,009 4.4% 2018 15,748 1.6%...
AI summary Table 4 presents the Annual Net System Requirement (NSR) from 2000 to 2029, showing the growth in gigawatt-hours (GWh) over time. The data indicates a general upward trend in energy demand, with varying growth rates across different years.
- 10 numbers refer to the numbers as listed in Appendix I of each evaluation report. Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement ARet 5: Facilitate tracking of savings by using adjusted unitary savings values. All tracking sheet recommendati...
AI summary The document outlines actions taken and planned by ENSC related to appliance retirement and replacement programs, including tracking sheet improvements, on-site metering for specific appliances, and promotional support for independent stores. Certain programs, like Appliance Replacement, are not being offered in 2012.
1 eliminating or reducing options, such as mini-split heat pumps, for which there is 2 already substantial demand, which leads to high free ridership 3 4 ENSC will limit free ridership for the Green Heating initiative by providing incent...
AI summary The document discusses ENSC's approach to limit free ridership in the Green Heating initiative by incentivizing only the highest-performing systems. It also requests a list of program changes ENSC plans to ensure the 2013-15 energy savings.
1 Request IR-19: 2 3 Is ENSC planning to include evaluation of Enabling Strategies in future third part 4 program evaluations and, if not, why not? 5 6 Response IR-19: 7 8 ENSC plans to include third-party evaluation of Enabling Strategies...
AI summary ENSC plans to include third-party evaluation of Enabling Strategies that claim energy savings, such as Codes and Standards, but not for strategies that do not claim savings, as their purpose is to encourage energy-efficient behaviors and increase participation in existing programs already evaluated by third parties.
Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-21 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-22: 2 3 Please provide as detailed and realistic as possible an example of the allocation of costs 4 between taxpayer and ratepayer components, based on the proposed budget...
AI summary The response to Request IR-22 provides examples of cost allocation between taxpayer and ratepayer components. It outlines how direct program costs, administrative overhead, and general program administration are allocated based on the proposed 2013 budget and anticipated program activity.
1 Notably for this reason, ENSC is proposing to develop or adapt specific performance requirements for air-source heat pumps, as indicated in Appendix E to the Evidence, page 4. A similar concern around air quality issues explains ENSC's i...
AI summary ENSC is proposing performance requirements for air-source heat pumps and biomass units to address air quality concerns. The document requests information on TRC and PAC screening tests for oil-fired appliances compared to other fuels, but ENSC did not perform these tests and explains that its Green Heating Systems approach is based on renewable energy criteria rather than test results.
d) Please explain why heating oil is the only petroleum-based heating fuel/gas not included under the Fuel Substitution Program. Response IR-2: a) The Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act, S.N.S. 2009, c. 3, as amended, ("the ENSC Act"),...
AI summary The response explains that heating oil is excluded from the Fuel Substitution Program due to the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act, which limits ENSC's mandate to electricity demand-side management and other energy efficiency programs. The Act does not require specific measures, and the Utility and Review Board (UARB) oversees program approval and cost allocation.
pursuant to section 36 of the Act. General supervision of ENSC as the independent DSM Administrator is mandated to the UARB pursuant to section 37 of the ENSC Act, through which the UARB may make all necessary examinations and enquiries an...
AI summary The ENSC Act grants ENSC broad authority to design demand-side management (DSM) programs, subject to UARB oversight. Heating oil was excluded from a Fuel Substitution pilot due to environmental, economic, and insurance concerns. ENSC's Green Heating Systems initiative found that replacing electricity with high-efficiency oil furnaces increased greenhouse gas emissions.
Annual Fuel Utilization Factor. 1 ENSC also explored the option of promoting condensing oil furnaces that can achieve 21 on certain design directions within the software) which drives them to install electric 22 heat in order to achieve th...
AI summary ENSC is adapting its programs based on the Provincial Building Code and uses the HOT2000 software to meet energy efficiency standards. There are concerns about anomalies in HOT2000 and whether promoting electric heat aligns with DSM goals.
New System Replace (R) / Offset (O) Electricity (kWh/yr) Fossil Fuels (fuel/yr) GHGs (kg CO2e/yr) AL NTI G RESIDE N XISTI E Wood Stove Pellet Stove Ductless HP – base Ductless HP - premium Air Source HP - base Air Source HP - premium Groun...
AI summary The table compares different heating systems, including wood stoves, pellet stoves, heat pumps, and oil furnaces, in terms of electricity usage, fossil fuel consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. It highlights the replacement or offset of certain systems and their environmental impact.
1 or avoided as the result of a DSM-related decrease in kWhs consumed, and should be 2 consistent with the assumptions that underlie NSPI's avoided costs. The scenarios 3 modeled are meant as reasonable boundaries for the likely marginal p...
AI summary The text discusses the modeling of avoided costs related to DSM initiatives, emphasizing the use of Energy StarTM furnaces with electronically commutated motors. It notes that ENSC did not model less efficient options in its analysis.
upgrades, in the Low Income program. 1 Request IR-2: 25 Lifetime Benefits is a summation of the avoided energy costs and avoided capacity costs 26 by measure within a program. 27 28 Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings at Generator (GWh)...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of Lifetime Benefits, Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings, and Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings within the Low Income program. It also introduces the TRC and PAC tests used to evaluate program components, such as the Efficient Products program, including the Screw-In (<=15W) Efficient Products measure.
- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-6: 2 3 With respect to NSPI's avoided costs, as provided by NSPI in February: 4 5 a) Please describe the method used to estimate these avoided costs. 6 7 b) If the method in a) is not based on adjusting load in...
AI summary The document outlines a request and response regarding NSPI's avoided costs methodology. The response explains that the 2012 avoided costs of DSM were calculated by comparing the 'No DSM' plan with a plan including DSM, with costs divided by annual DSM energy savings. A portion of the avoided cost is attributed to avoided capacity based on a combined cycle natural gas unit, including a 20% reserve margin.
- apartment buildings are not subject to the residential building code. - Gross standard savings - According to the Ministry of Labour and Workforce Development, compliance with the new - energy code has been significant to date. Although...
AI summary The text discusses energy code compliance and its impact on energy savings, referencing the Ministry of Labour and Workforce Development's assumption of 90% compliance. It also outlines the impact of new federal lighting regulations, which are expected to reduce lighting energy consumption by 25% to 30%, and references a socket study commissioned by ENSC in 2011.
Yearly net savings - The yearly savings coming from the general service lighting regulation is heavily dependent on - the replacement rate of the bulbs, and cannot be calculated based on the average bulb savings. A - distribution curve of...
AI summary Yearly savings from the general service lighting regulation depend on bulb replacement rates, calculated using a distribution curve of daily operating hours. The analysis assumes a 3-month period for depleting existing incandescent bulb stocks post-regulation implementation.
LINEAR FLUORESCENT LIGHTING - The existing Business Prescriptive (Smart Lighting Choices) program targets the same market as - the desired regulation for T12 lamps. Other Business programs with similar components include - the Small Busine...
AI summary The text discusses the existing Business Prescriptive (Smart Lighting Choices) program and its overlap with other programs like Small Business Energy Solutions and Custom, which target similar markets as the regulation for T12 lamps.
- capture approximately 80% of the potential market for high performance T8 lighting. 1 Potential savings - Since existing ENSC programs have the same impact as the proposed regulation, potential
AI summary The text discusses capturing approximately 80% of the potential market for high performance T8 lighting. It mentions that existing ENSC programs have the same impact as the proposed regulation, indicating a focus on energy efficiency and market penetration.
LED STREET LIGHTING The LED (Light Emitting Diode) street lighting estimate is based on the following assumptions: - approximately 120,000 street lights - average savings of 88W per street light when converted to LED - 4,000 hours of annua...
AI summary The LED street lighting estimate assumes 120,000 street lights, with an average saving of 88W per light, leading to 40 GWh of annual energy savings and 10 MW of peak demand savings.
- ten year implementation of the conversion (4 GWh and 1 MW each year) 1 Request IR-9: 2 3 With respect to Appendix C Table 2 a) (Attachment 1-8), please confirm that this table is 4 for 2014, as opposed to 2013 as included in the title. 5...
AI summary The document discusses a ten-year implementation plan for energy conversion, including requests and responses related to data accuracy, program calculations, and the proposed green heating systems initiative. The green heating systems initiative is described as a new component to be integrated into residential programs, with anticipated installations by type and year.
upgrades, in the Low Income program. 1 Request IR-2: 1 ENSC Measure Incentive = $1.02/unit 2 3 Net Present Value (NPV) of Energy Avoided Costs for Measure Life of 7 years = 4 $0.555/kWh 5 6 NPV of Demand Avoided Costs for Measure Life of 7...
AI summary The Low Income program's Request IR-2 outlines the ENSC Measure Incentive, energy and demand savings, avoided costs, and the TRC calculation. It includes data on net present value, administrative costs, and references to confidential attachments.
LINEAR FLUORESCENT LIGHTING - The existing Business Prescriptive (Smart Lighting Choices) program targets the same market as - the desired regulation for T12 lamps. Other Business programs with similar components include - the Small Busine...
AI summary The text discusses the existing Business Prescriptive (Smart Lighting Choices) program and its overlap with other programs like Small Business Energy Solutions and Custom, which target similar markets as the regulation for T12 lamps.
- capture approximately 80% of the potential market for high performance T8 lighting. 1 Potential savings - Since existing ENSC programs have the same impact as the proposed regulation, potential
AI summary The text discusses the goal of capturing approximately 80% of the potential market for high performance T8 lighting. It notes that existing ENSC programs have the same impact as the proposed regulation, suggesting potential savings.
12 MJ MNECB Adjusted Baseline 2011 NECB Savings Relative to Baseline 1997 1997 Lighting 2070 1351 23% Equipment 1092 1092 0% Heating 3329 3329 18% Cooling 329 329 12% Ancillary 1891 1891 25% Total 8711 7992 18% 13
AI summary The table compares energy savings from various building systems under the 2011 National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) relative to an adjusted baseline. Lighting, heating, and ancillary systems show significant savings, while equipment and cooling show lower savings. Total savings amount to an 18% reduction.
LED STREET LIGHTING The LED (Light Emitting Diode) street lighting estimate is based on the following assumptions: - approximately 120,000 street lights - average savings of 88W per street light when converted to LED - 4,000 hours of annua...
AI summary The document provides an estimate of energy savings from converting 120,000 street lights to LED, assuming an average savings of 88W per light, 4,000 hours of annual operation, and potential annual energy savings of 40 GWh and peak demand savings of 10 MW.
- ten year implementation of the conversion (4 GWh and 1 MW each year) 1 Request IR-9: 2 3 With respect to Appendix C Table 2 a) (Attachment 1-8), please confirm that this table is 4 for 2014, as opposed to 2013 as included in the title. 5...
AI summary The text discusses requests and responses related to a regulatory proceeding. It includes a request to confirm the year of a table, a request regarding DSM Rider bill impacts, and a request about a green heating systems program. The responses confirm the year of the table, state that no calculations were performed for consumption changes, and provide details about the green heating systems program.
2 3 Please provide a forecast of electricity sales to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated retail 4 customers, by rate class, in each year from 2013 through 2022. 5 6 Response IR-4: 7 8 The following table shows the 2011 base forecast prior to a...
AI summary The response provides a forecast of electricity sales to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated retail customers by rate class from 2013 through 2022, noting that the 2011 base forecast is presented prior to adjustments for DSM or other conservation programs, and that class level detail for 2022 and beyond has not been developed.
2 - 3 With regard to Figure 4.3 of the Evidence, please provide the average energy efficiency - 4 measure life associated with each efficiency program. 5 6 Response IR-5: - 8 The following figure presents, with regard to Figure 4.3 of the...
AI summary The respondent provides the average energy efficiency measure life for each program referenced in Figure 4.3 of the Evidence, calculated as a weighted average based on aggregate data.
Figure 4.2 2013 Lifetime Benefits ($ million) a PAC Lifetime Costs ($ million) b PAC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ million) c Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PROGRA AMS Efficient Product Rebates e 7.1 3.9 3.2 1.8 Existin...
AI summary Figure 4.2 presents a table showing the lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business programs, as well as enabling strategies. The table includes data on the Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) for each category.
12 Rate Class 2013 2014 2015 Residential 452,558 456,991 461,716 Small General 23,894 24,109 24,326 General Demand 11,387 11,349 11,310 Large General 18 19 19 Small Industrial 2,227 2,221 2,215 Medium Industrial 197 198 199 Large Industria...
AI summary The text presents a table showing the number of customers in different rate classes from 2013 to 2015 and includes requests and responses related to energy efficiency program participation and DSM budget estimates. It highlights variability in how participation is measured across programs and discusses the need for estimating DSM budgets to meet savings goals.
2 - 3 With regard to Figure 4.3 of the Evidence, please provide the average energy efficiency - 4 measure life associated with each efficiency program. 5 6 Response IR-5: - 8 The following figure presents, with regard to Figure 4.3 of the...
AI summary The respondent provided a weighted average measure life for each efficiency program, based on the aggregate data presented in Figure 4.3 of the Evidence, in response to a request for average energy efficiency measure life.
Figure 4.4 2015 Lifetime Benefits ($ millions) a PAC Lifetime Costs ($ millions) b PAC Lifetime Net Benefits ($ millions) c Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC) d RESIDENTIAL DSM PROG RAMS Efficient Product Rebates e 13.0 5.0 7.9 2.6 Exis...
AI summary Figure 4.4 presents a table summarizing the lifetime benefits, costs, and net benefits of various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. The data includes residential and business programs, along with enabling strategies, and provides insights into their financial impact.
12 Rate Class 2013 2014 2015 Residential 452,558 456,991 461,716 Small General 23,894 24,109 24,326 General Demand 11,387 11,349 11,310 Large General 18 19 19 Small Industrial 2,227 2,221 2,215 Medium Industrial 197 198 199 Large Industria...
AI summary The text presents a table showing the number of customers in various rate classes from 2013 to 2015. It also includes requests and responses related to energy efficiency program participation and DSM budget estimates. The responses note that participation may be measured differently depending on the program and that extrapolation of costs is needed to estimate DSM budgets.
generation plans for the No DSM and With DSM cases which include Bowater and Port Hawkesbury Paper Mill PM2 load. b) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 2. c) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 3. The loads and firm capacity (reso...
AI summary The text discusses generation plans with and without demand-side management (DSM), referencing specific attachments and transmission avoided costs. It notes that DSM programs are not geographically targeted and that avoided costs consider Nova Scotia's greenhouse gas regulations. Both DSM and non-DSM plans use the same environmental and system constraints.
Within programs, the error has the greatest impact on those programs with a relatively high percentage of measures with relatively low NTG factors, such as the Existing Residential and New Residential programs. The following aggregate prog...
AI summary The error in the programs has the greatest impact on those with high percentages of measures with low NTG factors, such as the Existing Residential and New Residential programs. However, aggregate program and sectoral results like Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings and Incremental Annual Net Demand Savings were not materially affected.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-35: Does ENSC agree that the average customer will have lower usage in 2013– with the energy-efficiency program than without? Response IR-35: Yes. Average customer usage of electricity would be higher in the abs...
AI summary ENSC agrees that energy efficiency programs reduce average customer electricity usage compared to a scenario without such programs, offsetting the trend of increasing electricity load growth.
2 Source: Nova Scotia Power Inc. Tariffs & Regulations Effective January 1, 2012 1 Request IR-37: 2 3 Does ENSC agree that NSPI's fuel adjustment charge will be lower with the energy 4 efficiency programs than without? 5 6 a) If not, pleas...
AI summary The document contains two requests and responses from the Energy and Utilities Board of Nova Scotia (ENSC) regarding Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). Request IR-37 asks whether energy efficiency programs would lower NSPI's fuel adjustment charge, to which ENSC responds that it does not have the necessary information. Request IR-38 inquires about deferred capital investments due to reduced loads from energy efficiency programs, and ENSC states that no such investments have been identified.
1 EXISTING HOUSES (cont.) Measure Program Type Maximum Market Potential (MWh) Maximum Market Potential (MWh) In a Competition Group? Difference (MWh) before RAM Tool after RAM Tool correction correction CFL: Screw-In (<=15W) Existing Homes...
AI summary The table outlines energy efficiency measures for existing homes, including maximum market potential before and after RAM Tool corrections, with some measures showing significant differences. The data covers various lighting and water efficiency programs, including CFLs, LEDs, and low-flow fixtures, and indicates whether measures compete in a group.
1 EXISTING HOUSES COMPONENT Measure Program Type MWh before RAM Tool correction MWh after RAM Tool correction Difference (MWh) Calibration Total (MWh) 6,500 6,500 0 CFL - Dimmable - 19 W Existing Homes 6.4 6.3 -0.1 Energy Star Decorative C...
AI summary The table presents energy efficiency measures for existing homes, comparing energy usage before and after correction using the RAM Tool. Each measure shows a slight reduction in MWh following the correction, indicating the tool's impact on energy savings estimates.
1 EXISTING HOUSES COMPONENT (cont.) Measure Program Type MWh before RAM Tool correction MWh after RAM Tool correction Difference (MWh) LED 6 W Screw-In (replacing 60 W Incandescent) (MURB) Existing Homes 7 6 0 CFL: Screw-In (16-24W) (MURB)...
AI summary The table presents data on energy efficiency measures for existing homes, comparing energy savings before and after correction using the RAM Tool. The data includes various measures such as LED and CFL lighting, water heater wraps, and thermostats, with some measures showing minimal or no change in energy savings after correction.
We clarify today how the NTG ratio is to be applied to the cost-side of the TRC equation. As described in the SPM and reiterated in D.06-06-063, the intent of the TRC test of cost-effectiveness is to capture " all costs associated with the...
AI summary The document clarifies the application of the Net-to-Gross (NTG) ratio to the cost-side of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) equation, emphasizing the inclusion of all costs associated with energy efficiency activities, including those incurred by free rider participants.
s we presented in D.06-06-063 involved only one participant, the issue of how to fold in free rider considerations on the cost side of the TRC equation was never explicitly addressed in that decision. In fact, the only time we have discuss...
AI summary The 2007 SPM Clarification Memo addresses unresolved issues from prior decisions (e.g., D.06-06-063) regarding the application of the NTG ratio to energy efficiency program costs. It highlights concerns that the 1988 SPM Correction Memo's TRC cost equation may unfairly advantage rebate programs over direct install programs by misallocating free rider costs, requiring reevaluation in post-2005 portfolio planning.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 An exception to this methodology is for a small set of residential measures where participation 3 estimates are fixed values provided to Navigant by ENSC. These measures include the ones 4 included in the Green Heat St...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology for estimating participation levels in residential energy efficiency programs, including the Green Heat Strategy, and references a request for explanation regarding a decrease in program participation from 2012 to 2013.
TO: Navigant Consulting Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation FROM: Glen Weisbrod and Lisa Petraglia, EDR Group DATE: April 27, 2012 RE: Independent Assessment Report - Navigant's Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model (RAM Tool)
AI summary A letter from Glen Weisbrod and Lisa Petraglia of EDR Group to Navigant Consulting and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation dated April 27, 2012, references an Independent Assessment Report evaluating Navigant's Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model (RAM Tool). The document outlines the purpose of the assessment but does not detail specific findings or conclusions.
EDR Group Economic Development Research Group (EDR Group) is a research and consulting firm that works across North America, applying state-of-the-art tools and techniques for evaluating public investments and policies. The hallmark of EDR...
AI summary EDR Group is a North American research and consulting firm specializing in public investment and policy evaluation using modeling tools. They focus on energy efficiency, renewable energy, and pricing programs. The firm emphasizes its independence from Navigant Consulting and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC).
Purpose At the request of ENSC, Economic Development Research Group was retained by Navigant to conduct an Independent Assessment of Navigant's Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model (RAM Tool). This report is intended to provide ENSC...
AI summary ENSC requested Economic Development Research Group (EDR Group) to assess Navigant's Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model (RAM Tool). The assessment focuses on verifying corrections to a Net-To-Gross (NTG) duplication error, evaluating algorithms for systemic errors, and reviewing Navigant's Quality Control practices. The report aims to validate the RAM Tool's functionality for ENSC and Navigant.
Economic Development Research Group, Inc. (EDR Group) is a consulting firm focusing specifically on applying state-of-the-art tools and techniques for evaluating public investments and policies. The firm was started in 1996 by a core group...
AI summary The Economic Development Research Group, Inc. (EDR Group) is a Boston-based consulting firm established in 1996, specializing in impact analysis, market/strategy analysis, and benefit/cost analysis for public policies and private investments. They focus on energy, environment, transportation, and economic development, with expertise in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and utility pricing studies.
Direct Economic Effects Other Economic Effects Local admin of Stimulus Regional Economy Spending Lower Business Operating Costs (increased · Labor, Materials competitiveness for business attraction) · Funding for Participants Lower Househo...
AI summary The document outlines direct and indirect economic benefits of energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia, including lower business operating costs, increased household disposable income, regional economic growth through local manufacturing and installation sectors, and environmental benefits like reduced pollution emissions.
Hourly Rates: Senior Oversight: Lisa Petraglia and Glen Weisbrod - $200 per hour Model Analyst: Adam Winston and Derek Cutler - $110 per hour Blended Daily Average (2 hrs Sr. Oversight, 6 hrs. Analyst) - $1,060 per day Glen Weisbrod is Pre...
AI summary The document outlines hourly rates for senior oversight and model analyst roles, including a blended daily average. Glen Weisbrod, President of EDR Group, is highlighted for his expertise in economic impact studies and energy program evaluations, with a focus on transportation, energy, and technology development across multiple regions.
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ("Corporation") is a not-for-profit organization, incorporated by legislation in the Province of Nova Scotia under the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act ("Act") on January 22,...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, a not-for-profit established by the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act in 2010, manages energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. It oversees the Electricity Demand-Side Management Fund (EDSM Fund), previously administered by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI). The Corporation operates under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) and is exempt from income taxes under the Income Tax Act.
- f) ENSC's proposal to transition from the Program Development Working Group (PDWG) to a DSM Advisory Group is in keeping with the evolution of DSM 1 to 5 DISCUSS YOUR WITH TO OF DSM PROGRAMS PROPOSED FOR 2013, 2014 and 2015. 1 11 1 • 1 •...
AI summary ENSC proposes transitioning from the Program Development Working Group (PDWG) to a DSM Advisory Group, aligning with the evolution of DSM. The document outlines various energy efficiency programs, including new initiatives like the Green Heating Systems program, which is an evolution of a 2011 pilot fuel substitution program.
Renewable Heating Industry Strategy, which is now being expanded again to become the Green Heating Systems program. 4 ENSC(CA) IR-3 • Existing Residential - 1 ENSC is also changing its delivery with a focus on "one-window approach", design...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) is updating its Residential program and transitioning to a 'one-window approach' to simplify customer access to energy efficiency, shifting the responsibility of selecting Demand Side Management (DSM) programs from customers to ENSC.
& lt;sup>5 ENSC Evidence, page 17(pdf page 20), line 11. 1 The second area that warrants further comment is the economic assessment of ENSC's 2 proposed programs provided in Figures 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4, as revised by ENSC on April 18, 3 2012....
AI summary The document discusses the economic assessment of ENSC's proposed programs, focusing on the Energy Savings Actions program in the residential sector. It highlights the TRC (Total Resource Cost) values over time, the assumptions used in the assessment, and the impact of avoided costs provided by NSPI. The one-year life assumption for savings is questioned, and the continuation of the program is supported based on the expected improvement in TRC.
13 Q: Have you testified previously regarding energy-efficiency programs? - 14 A: Yes. I have testified in at least three score proceedings on utility-funded energy- - 15 efficiency efforts, as listed in my resume.
AI summary The witness has testified in multiple proceedings regarding utility-funded energy-efficiency programs, as detailed in their resume.
5 Q: Why does ENSC exclude the avoided costs of transmission and distribution? 6 A: That is difficult to determine from the record in this case. On the one hand, 7 ENSC, perhaps quoting NSPI, dismisses the possibility that reducing or 8 el...
AI summary ENSC excludes avoided transmission and distribution (T&D) costs, citing their relative insignificance compared to energy and capacity costs. It argues DSM programs lack geographic targeting to impact specific high-load areas, making T&D upgrades unavoidable. However, ENSC acknowledges future inclusion of T&D costs, referencing a 2012 Dunsky Energy Consulting report on avoided T&D benefits in other jurisdictions.
SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1986– Present President, Resource Insight, Inc. Consults and testifies in utility and insurance economics. Reviews utility supply-planning processes and outcomes: assesses prudence of prior power planning...
AI summary The individual has extensive experience in utility and insurance economics, including reviewing utility supply planning, rate design, conservation programs, and advising regulatory commissions. They have worked as President of Resource Insight, Inc., Research Associate at Analysis and Inference, Inc., and Utility Rate Analyst for the Massachusetts Attorney General, focusing on topics like demand forecasting, cost allocation, and energy conservation.
PUBLICATIONS "Environmental Regulation in the Changing Electric-Utility Industry" (with Rachel Brailove), International Association for Energy Economics Seventeenth Annual North American Conference (96–105) . Cleveland, Ohio: USAEE. 1996....
AI summary The text lists academic publications from 1992 to 1996 addressing energy efficiency, utility resource planning, environmental regulation, and DSM cost allocation. These works were presented at conferences and published in journals, contributing to energy policy and regulatory frameworks discussions.
REPORTS "State of Ohio Energy-Efficiency Technical-Reference Manual Including Predetermined Savings Values and Protocols for Determining Energy and Demand Savings" (with others). 2010. Burlington, Vt.: Vermont Energy Investment Corporation...
AI summary The text lists technical reports and studies on energy efficiency, demand-side management, and cost analysis from various U.S. states and organizations. These include evaluations of energy-saving protocols, procurement strategies, and avoided energy costs, though none directly reference Nova Scotia or the NSUARB.
- "Environmental Externalities: Current Approaches and Potential Implications for District Heating and Cooling" (with R. Brailove), International District Heating and Cooling Association 84th Annual Conference; June 1993. - "Using the Cost...
AI summary The text lists presentations on energy efficiency, environmental externalities, and utility planning. Topics include integrated resource planning, demand-side management, and cost recovery. Key entities include MIT, NARUC, ENSC, and NSPI. Presentations address environmental externalities, utility regulations, and conservation strategies in natural gas and electricity sectors.
wth; cost of generation, transmission, and distribution additions. Determination of hook-up charges. Development of residential load estimation procedure reflecting appliance ownership, dwelling size. 58. New Mexico PSC 2004; Public Servic...
AI summary The document references multiple regulatory proceedings from 1987, covering nuclear decommissioning costs, utility rate design, insurance rate filings, and excess capacity analyses. Cases involve entities like New Mexico PSC, MDPU, and Texas PUC, addressing topics such as long-run marginal cost rate design, nuclear plant viability, and conservation potential.
Before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF An Application to Approve Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Electricity Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan for 2013-2015 Direct Testimony of George Foote on behalf of the N...
AI summary The document details George Foote's testimony on behalf of the Nova Scotia Consumer Advocate regarding the approval of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2013-2015 DSM Plan. Foote, with extensive experience in energy efficiency and climate change, previously testified in 2011 on a similar DSM plan.
Q. Have you testified before other utility regulatory Boards? A. Yes. I testified on behalf of the Nova Scotia Department of Energy at the joint National - Energy Board/Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board hearing of an application...
AI summary The witness testified on behalf of the Nova Scotia Department of Energy regarding EnCana's Deep Panuke Natural Gas Project and DSM topics including budget, energy savings targets, approval process changes, low-income programs, Enabling Strategies, free ridership, and ENSC program administration.
t is conceivable, then, that new provincial environmental constraints to 2030 for - greenhouse gas emissions will also include a discussion of new limits for air pollutants to 2030 at - the same time. - As noted in response to Avon IR-34,...
AI summary The document discusses challenges in achieving cost-effective energy savings under DSM, noting that incremental savings are 30% more expensive than projected. Environmental regulations, renewable energy integration, and declining TRC (Total Resource Cost) are key factors. A new IRP by 2013 is recommended to guide future DSM spending and align with updated capacity and environmental requirements.
Q. What are your views on the low income programs proposed by ENSC? - A. Access to ENSC programs is important to ensure fairness to ratepayers who are paying - for the DSM initiative. It is recognized that some groups face higher barriers...
AI summary The respondent supports ENSC's low-income programs, highlighting their importance in ensuring fairness and addressing barriers faced by low-income ratepayers. The 2013-2015 DSM Plan includes significant investment in low-income programs, and past performance, such as exceeding energy savings targets in 2011, suggests the program's effectiveness. Recommendations include monitoring barriers and adjusting targets based on experience.
George R. Foote Bachelors of Arts (Political Science), University of Western Ontario, 1975 14 Cheltonham Court, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, B2Y 4V2, CANADA Telephone: 902-496-3713 (home) 222-5858 (mobile) E-mail: [email protected] WORK EX...
AI summary George R. Foote is a private consultant with experience advising Nova Scotia Consumer Advocate on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's 2012 Demand Side Management Plan and Nova Scotia Environment on federal greenhouse gas regulations. He previously served as Senior Advisor and Executive Director in Nova Scotia's Climate Change Directorate, focusing on policy development and implementation of climate action plans.
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD In the Matter of Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation - Application for Approval of its Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2013-2015 E-ENSC-R-12 / Matter No. M04819
AI summary Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation seeks approval for its 2013-2015 Electricity Demand Side Management Plan. The proceeding is under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, with reference to Matter No. M04819 and docket E-ENSC-R-12.
- Q. Please state your name, title and employer. - A. My name is Tim Woolf. I am a Vice-President at Synapse Energy Economics, - located at 485 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139. - Q. Please describe Synapse Energy Economics. - A....
AI summary Tim Woolf, Vice-President at Synapse Energy Economics, has extensive experience in energy efficiency policies and programs, including his role as a commissioner at the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities. He has worked on energy efficiency guidelines, ratepayer-funded programs, and has testified on energy efficiency issues in multiple jurisdictions, including Nova Scotia.
- designed to promote cost-effective energy efficiency improvements to Nova 1 Scotia's housing stock of single detached houses, duplexes, rental housing, 2 mobile/mini homes and multi-family buildings, and includes small community 3 buildi...
AI summary ENSC proposes to recover approximately $24 million annually through the Residential rate class for its three-year plan, aiming to achieve energy savings and enroll participants in the Existing Residential program. The program includes incentives for energy efficiency improvements in various housing types.
Q. What conclusions do you draw with regard to the magnitude of these rate and bill impacts? A. I do not intend to draw any conclusions about the magnitude of these rate and bill impacts at this point in time. Instead, I present the result...
AI summary The answer states that no conclusions are drawn about the magnitude of rate and bill impacts at this time. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of presenting analysis results to illustrate methodology and recommends that ENSC include such information in future DSM Plans for the Board and stakeholders to assess impacts of energy efficiency activities.
Q. You mentioned that ENSC should look at program participation levels. Why? A. After reviewing the rate and bill impact analysis, it is important to analyze program participation to discern the extent of customers experiencing bill increa...
AI summary Analyzing program participation levels helps assess how rate changes affect customer bills. High participation in energy efficiency programs can offset DSM rate increases, reducing long-term bills. The 2012 DSM Plan testimony highlights participation's critical role in evaluating acceptable rate impacts.
Q. What conclusions do you draw from the information presented in Figure 4? A. I do not intend to draw specific conclusions from the participation rates in Figure 4 as part of my testimony, because I see these participation rates as prelim...
AI summary The witness notes Figure 4's participation rates are preliminary and may include double-counting. However, they conclude that DSM programs will reach a large portion of Nova Scotia customers, leading to lower bills. Programs like the Home Energy Report and Efficient Product Rebate are expected to achieve high participation rates. The witness recommends maximizing participation to ensure equity and mitigate rate impacts.
Q. What is the impact on Residential bills from the 20 percent increase in program budgets? A. The impact on bills from this incremental increase in program budgets are presented in Figure 8. This figure mirrors the information presented i...
AI summary A 20% increase in program budgets leads to a 0.5-1.0% initial increase in non-participant residential bills, followed by a 0.1-0.3% decrease. Participants see ~14% bill reductions. ENSC could enroll 12,000 participants, saving 17.2 GWh annually. The average rate impact over the study period is less than 0.1%.
the performance incentives resulting from an energy efficiency program are changed by 20 percent. 2 1 ENSC recommends that it continue to meet quarterly with the Board. Regular 26 a new program is added to the portfolio of programs; 27 a...
AI summary The document discusses changes to energy efficiency programs, including adding new programs, terminating existing ones, altering budgets by 20 percent, and modifying program savings by 20 percent. ENSC recommends regular quarterly meetings with the Board.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Synapse Energy Economics Inc ., Cambridge, MA. Vice President, 2011 to present. Provides expert consulting on the economic, regulatory, consumer, environmental, and public policy implications of the electricity and...
AI summary The individual has extensive experience in energy policy and consulting, including roles at Synapse Energy Economics Inc. and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU). Key contributions include advancing clean energy policies, expanding energy efficiency programs, implementing decoupled rates, and shaping net metering regulations. They also led rate case proceedings and participated in regional energy initiatives.
TESTIMONY Missouri Office of Public Counsel (Docket No. EO-2011-0271). Rebuttal testimony regarding IRP rule compliance. On behalf of Missouri Office of the Public Counsel. October 28, 2011. Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission (Docket...
AI summary Multiple testimonies from various states' Public Utilities Commissions and advocacy groups address energy efficiency, renewable energy standards, and IRP compliance. Testimonies include rebuttals, direct, and surrebuttal statements from entities like the Missouri Office of Public Counsel, National Grid, and the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, across different docket numbers.
REPORTS Indian Point Energy Center Nuclear Plant Retirement Analysis, prepared for Natural Resources Defense Council, and Riverkeeper, October 17, 2011. Equipment Price Forecasting in Energy Conservation Standards Analysis, prepared for Ap...
AI summary The document lists multiple reports on energy efficiency, resource planning, and regulatory processes prepared for various organizations, including environmental groups, utility companies, and state regulatory bodies, spanning 2005 to 2011. Topics include carbon emissions, integrated resource planning, and energy conservation standards.
ARTICLES AND PRESENTATIONS Energy Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness Tests, presented at the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships Annual Meeting, October, 12, 2011 Why Consumer Advocates Should Support Decoupling, presented at the 2011 ACEE...
AI summary The text lists presentations on energy efficiency, demand response, and regulatory strategies, including discussions on cost-effectiveness tests, decoupling, rate impacts, and utility motivation. Key organizations and conferences involved include NEEP, ACEEE, Efficiency Maine, and NARUC, with a focus on policy development and regulatory perspectives in energy management.
Developing Integrated Resource Planning Policies in the European Community , Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, Energy and Environment Issue, Vol. 1, Issue 2. 1992. Testimony of Tim Woolf Savings per Participan...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency programs, including savings per participant, participants per dollar spent, and the impact of increasing the budget by 20%. It also discusses the effects of increased demand-side management (DSM) on energy efficiency rates and cumulative participation percentages.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2013 DSM Plan NSUARB-E-ENSC-R-12 Before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board REDACTED Evidence of Drazen Consulting Group, Inc. on Behalf of the Avon Group Project No. 121522 May 22, 2012
AI summary The document pertains to a 2013 DSM (Demand Side Management) Plan by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, part of a proceeding before the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. Evidence submitted by Drazen Consulting Group on behalf of the Avon Group includes a project (No. 121522) dated May 22, 2012. The proceeding involves a redacted section.
2006 Conservation and Energy Efficiency Plan, Page 37. 2008-2010: 2010 Application Exhibit N-7( c) Response to Multeese IR-8. 2011: 2011 DSM Evidence of NSPI, Page 12. 2012: 2011 Application, Response to Multeese IR-2(b). 2013: Derived fro...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of assumptions about new capacity additions on capacity cost and long-run levelized cost, noting that NSPI does not anticipate needing new capacity through 2017, with avoided energy costs being the primary consideration. Variability in calculated energy costs from 2012 to 2017 is highlighted.
Table 9 Measures with Negative Net Benefits Program Measure TRC Costs (000) TRC Net Benefit ($000) TRC Ratio Residential–existing houses Solar Hot Water Heater, replacing electric water heater (Table 2.1) $1,633 -$893 0.5 Residential–Low I...
AI summary Table 9 identifies measures with negative net benefits, including solar hot water heaters and retrofit envelope measures for low-income residential programs. The table highlights TRC costs, net benefits, and ratios. The question focuses on the impact of lower avoided costs on TRC benefit/cost ratios.
Table 10 TRC Benefit/Cost Ratio with Change in Avoided Costs TRC Costs TRC Ratio TRC Ratio Program Measure ($000) As Filed Revised Residential – Power Bar $275 0.9 0.7 Efficient Products With Timer (Table 1) Residential – Refrigerator 2,05...
AI summary Table 10 presents the TRC benefit/cost ratio for various residential energy efficiency programs, showing that changes in avoided costs have reduced the ratio for the Residential Existing Home and Residential Low Income programs to below 1.0, with total costs exceeding $12 million.
Evidence of Canadian Oil Heat Association – Nova Scotia (COHA-NS) May 22, 2012
AI summary The Canadian Oil Heat Association – Nova Scotia (COHA-NS) submitted evidence on May 22, 2012, in a regulatory proceeding. The document references Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) as a relevant entity, though specific claims or arguments are not detailed in the provided text.
9 Q. What are the purposes of the ENSC Act ? - A. The purposes of the Act are stated to be establishing an administrator to manage DSM,10 - establishing a fund to defray the costs, providing for regulatory oversight of the administrator,11...
AI summary The ENSC Act establishes an administrator to manage demand-side management (DSM), creates a fund to cover costs, ensures regulatory oversight, and authorizes the administrator to implement energy efficiency and conservation programs beyond electricity DSM initiatives.
14 Q. How is ENSC authorized to meet the purposes of the ENSC Act ? - A. Section 8 of the ENSC Act states that the objects of ENSC as the independent DSM15 - Administrator are to (a) design and administer DSM electricity programs with a vi...
AI summary ENSC is authorized under Section 8 of the ENSC Act to design and administer demand-side management (DSM) electricity programs and energy efficiency initiatives. The Act does not mandate specific program types or fuels, with program content subject to Board oversight and approval. ENSC clarified that no legislation requires particular measures in DSM programs.
1 Q. What do you recommend? - A. We recommend that the Board direct ENSC to adjust its DSM Plan to include incentives2 - to fuel switch to Energy Star (84%-97%) oilheat equipment technologies in both existing houses3 - and new construction...
AI summary Recommends adjusting ENSC's DSM Plan to include incentives for fuel switching to Energy Star oilheat equipment. COHA-NS seeks stakeholder recognition and inclusion of oilheat options in future programs. Background includes a 2009-2010 study by Navigant on fuel substitution potential.
18 Q. How has the oil heat industry responded to the Action Plan? A. Firstly, the oil heat industry has never been contacted by ENSC to discuss ways to19 implement reductions for our industry. COHA was contracted by its predecessor, Conser...
AI summary The oil heat industry states ENSC did not engage them on GHG reduction strategies. COHA-NS administered rebate programs like 'Retire Your Furnace' and 'EEFI', upgrading ~7,000 appliances, reducing oil imports and GHG emissions. Industry claims these efforts demonstrate their capacity for energy efficiency and emissions reduction.
Achieving Provincial Greenhouse Gas Reduction Emissions Targets TOGETHER RETIRE YOUR FURNACE (October 12, 2005—March 31, 2007) Total Boiler/Furnace/Indirect applications received under program 4,030 ENERGY EFFICIENCY FURNACE INITIATIVE (Se...
AI summary The text presents data on furnace replacement programs aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Nova Scotia, highlighting the number of applications received under two initiatives between 2005 and 2009.
DID YOU KNOW? 14,648 tonnes CO2 saved is the equivalent of removing 4,902\ \ \ vehicles from our highways. \ Representative of Furnaces and Boilers only; does not include indirect water heaters \ \ Sustainable Liquid Fuels Research. 2008....
AI summary ENSC's program achieved limited GHG reductions with only 296 homeowners switching to wood/pellet stoves, while COHA-NS/Conserve Nova Scotia's appliance efficiency programs showed greater impact. Experts argue conservation, not conversion, drives significant GHG reductions.
12 Q. Did Dunsky consider high efficiency condensing oil heating furnaces in his
AI summary The document contains a question from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, inquiring whether Dunsky evaluated high-efficiency condensing oil heating furnaces in his analysis. The context implies the proceeding involves energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions considerations.
18 Q. Is this appropriate? - A. No; it is based on outdated information. Oil heat manufacturers have made great strides19 - in the area of efficiencies for their heating appliances. Condensing oil warm air furnaces have20 - now been availa...
AI summary The response argues that the information is outdated, highlighting advancements in oil heat efficiency, such as 95% AFUE condensing furnaces like the Kerr Paradigm and Conforto (95.7% AFUE). These products are tested for sulphur content (1500 ppm), exceeding typical Nova Scotia heating fuel sulphur levels (500–1000 ppm).
Project Report Thomas A. Butcher and Roger J. McDonald Prepared for the Building Technologies Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy United States Department of Energy Energy Resources Division Department of Energy Scienc...
AI summary A project report authored by Thomas A. Butcher and Roger J. McDonald for the US Department of Energy's Building Technologies Program Office. The report was prepared under Contract No. DE-ACO2-98CH10886 by Brookhaven National Laboratory and Brookhaven Science Associates for the Energy Resources Division of the Department of Energy Sciences and Technology.
Abstract The introduction of oil-fired condensing boilers and furnaces to the U.S. market offers the potential for a significant step increase in efficiency. With oil, the energy loss in a conventional, non-condensing appliance associated...
AI summary The document discusses the efficiency improvements of oil-fired condensing boilers and furnaces, highlighting up to 98% combustion efficiency and 25-45% energy savings in furnaces. Lab and field studies evaluated performance, condensation limits, and corrosion risks, noting that high return water temperatures in boilers sometimes prevent condensing operation.
Table of Contents Abstract i Figure 21 Condensing boiler at Standfordville, NY site 22 Figure 22 Condensing boiler and complex distribution system, Walden, N.Y. 23 Figure 23 New condensing boiler design 24 Figure 24 Condensing boiler befor...
AI summary The document contains a table of contents with figures and tables related to condensing boilers, including their design, performance, and maintenance, as well as latent heat loss comparisons for different fuels in non-condensing systems.
Condensing boilers and furnaces achieve very high efficiency by recovering both sensible heat from flue gas dry components (N2, CO2, O2) and both sensible and latent heat from flue gas water vapor. Generally the transition from conventiona...
AI summary Condensing boilers and furnaces achieve high efficiency by recovering both sensible and latent heat from flue gas. The transition from non-condensing appliances can significantly increase efficiency. Fuel properties, particularly the hydrogen to carbon ratio, influence the amount of water vapor and latent heat recovery, affecting condensation and efficiency levels.
Table 1. Latent Heat Loss for Natural Gas, Propane, and Oil in a Non-Condensing Boiler or Furnace (ASHRAE 1993) Fuel Latent Heat Loss (% of Input Based on Higher Heating Value) Natural Gas 9.55 Propane 7.99 Heating Oil 6.50 Gas-fired conde...
AI summary This table presents latent heat loss percentages for natural gas, propane, and oil in non-condensing boilers or furnaces, based on ASHRAE 1993 data. It also discusses the growing market for condensing boilers, particularly in Europe and the U.S., with a note that all new boilers in the U.K. after 2007 must be condensing.
Condensation only starts to occur when the boiler return water temperature is below the saturation temperature of the water vapor, which is affected by the fuel, excess air level, and, to a lesser degree, the ambient air humidity. Figure 1...
AI summary The text explains how condensation occurs in boilers and furnaces, depending on factors like return water temperature, fuel type, and excess air levels. It highlights that condensing appliances require surfaces below the saturation temperature, with radiant floor heating being ideal for condensing boilers due to lower return water temperatures.
Experimental The purpose of the laboratory studies was to develop a performance map for the condensing boiler over the range from idle to full load. This performance map would then be used in a simple bin analysis to estimate the annual oi...
AI summary The text describes experimental studies on condensing boilers, including performance mapping, testing methods, and measurement techniques. BNL is conducting research on integrated hydronic systems to reduce oil consumption, using detailed test setups and data acquisition systems.
Field Studies
AI summary The Field Studies section discusses energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analyses involving organizations like Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), and the National Oilheat Research Alliance (NORA). Key topics include transportation energy use and regulatory frameworks.
burner is mounted (409 stainless steel) and the secondary or condensing heat exchanger is formed of smaller diameter AL 29-4C with fins on the outside and baffles on the interior or flue gas hot side. The secondary heat exchanger works lik...
AI summary The document describes the construction of a condensing furnace, emphasizing materials like stainless steel and AL 29-4C, a self-cleaning process via condensate drainage, and the importance of proper installation. It also references BNL's analysis of fuel delivery records for condensing vs. non-condensing furnaces in the U.S.
Durability of Oil-fired Condensing Warm Air Furnaces BNL secured the cooperation of a major fuel oil marketer in Hampton, Virginia allowing a staff member to visit the company for the purpose of inspecting several condensing warm air furna...
AI summary This report details an inspection of oil-fired condensing furnaces in Virginia, finding no corrosion after 20 months of use. The units, developed under a NORA grant with materials based on Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and DOE-EERE research, showed excellent durability. A minor gasket issue was corrected during the inspection.
id="page-45-0"> Figure 22 Condensing boiler and complex distribution system, Walden, N.Y. BNL Participation In Field Trials of a New Condensing Boiler Design In its efforts to support the development of new high efficiency options for the...
AI summary BNL participated in field trials of a new condensing boiler developed with NORA and a private company. The boiler uses European heat exchanger and US components, achieving 93% AFUE. Tested in 2005/2006.
Field Results The pre-production prototype was installed during the second half of the heating season in a house located on Long Island, NY. During the following summer a team consisting of BNL staff, the boiler manufacturer and one oil bu...
AI summary A pre-production prototype condensing boiler was installed in a house on Long Island, NY. Post-heating season inspection revealed minimal corrosion, with the highest corrosion near the return flow connection. A water wash cleaning procedure was effective, and deposits were analyzed for iron and sulfate concentrations.
Condensing Boiler Deposit Analysis (Long Island) # Sample Location Sulfate Iron % Sulfate by % Iron by Concentration Concentration Weight Determined Determined Weight 1 Top, Upper Jet 10 mg./liter 2.49 mg./liter 6.8 % 1.7 % 2 Bottom, Upper...
AI summary This document presents an analysis of condensing boiler deposits in Long Island, including sulfate and iron concentrations from various sample locations. It also references a successful field evaluation by BNL/DOE that influenced the manufacturer's decision to produce a high-efficiency prototype boiler for the US oilheating industry.
Conclusions Condensing boilers and furnaces offer the potential for a significant step increase in the efficiency of oil heated homes. To achieve condensing operation the appliance heat transfer surfaces must be below the water vapor dewpo...
AI summary Condensing boilers and furnaces can significantly improve oil heating efficiency, but furnaces are more effective due to lower return air temperatures. Boilers may fail to condense at high return water temperatures, limiting latent heat recovery. While corrosion rates are higher in condensing systems, they appear manageable with lower sulfur fuels over time.
References - ASHRAE. 1993. ASHRAE Standard 103-1993, Method of Testing for Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central Furnaces and Boilers . Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers,...
AI summary The references include studies and reports on condensing boilers, hydronic heating systems, and energy efficiency technologies. Key authors include Butcher, Locklin, Mori, and Weber, with organizations like ASHRAE, BNL, and programs such as OPET cited. Focus areas include thermal distribution systems, heat exchangers, and efficiency standards for oil-fired heating equipment.
NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY & REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380 as amended IN THE MATTER OF: An Application to Approve Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Electricity Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board is considering an application by Efficiency Nova Scotia to approve its Electricity Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan for 2013-2015 under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding involves evaluating the plan's compliance with regulatory standards and its impact on electricity demand management.
16. ENSC and COHA-NS agree that: - a) COHA-NS will be recognized as a stakeholder in future proposed DSM programs and that oil heat options will be considered for inclusion in energy efficiency and conservation programs; and - b) Outside t...
AI summary ENSC and COHA-NS agree to recognize COHA-NS as a stakeholder in future demand-side management (DSM) programs, including oil heat options. They also commit to discussing incentives for high-efficiency condensing oil heating furnaces with provincial representatives outside electricity ratepayer DSM programs.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 Electricity Conservation & Efficiency (DSM) Plan 2013‐15 Hearing Before N.S. Utility and Review Board Opening Remarks by Allan Crandlemire CEO, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY Good afternoon,...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's CEO, Allan Crandlemire, emphasizes broad stakeholder consensus on the 2013-15 DSM Plan, highlighting collaboration with ratepayer groups, businesses, and industry players. The agreement ensures multi-year program certainty, supporting energy efficiency investments and stakeholder trust in Nova Scotia.
r business, continue to develop their skills and capacity, and deliver better service to customers. No question, there is rising frustration over the rising cost of energy. People want to fight back. Efficiency Nova Scotia is your best way...
AI summary The text highlights Efficiency Nova Scotia's role in combating rising energy costs through energy efficiency initiatives. It emphasizes savings achieved, including $100 million in future electricity cost reductions and 141.8 million kWh saved. The program's success in engaging businesses, low-income residents, renters, and First Nations communities is noted, along with plans to expand a pilot project.
to reach according to other efficiency organizations. A successful pilot project in two First Nations communities reached 170 homes and is being expanded to more First Nations communities this year. Two other pilot projects took on efficie...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia highlights successful energy efficiency initiatives, including pilot projects in First Nations communities, demonstration homes with the Nova Scotia Homebuilders' Association, and the Green Schools program with Clean Nova Scotia. The proposed plan emphasizes customer-focused approaches, multi-year planning, and improved regulatory engagement to enhance energy savings and program effectiveness.
oversight will remain as strong and productive as ever. We will continue meeting regularly with the Board as well as stakeholders, providing regular, detailed reports, and responding to any concerns. The strength and productivity of our re...
AI summary The company emphasizes strong stakeholder relationships, 97% customer satisfaction from a survey, and the importance of promoting energy efficiency to lower power bills and improve economic outcomes in Nova Scotia. Energy efficiency is framed as a cost-effective solution with broader societal benefits.
ALL OF WHICH is hereby agreed to and signed by legal counsel or other authorized representative this 28 th day of May, 2012. Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Per: Allan Crandlemire, CEO Avon Group Consumer Advocate Per: Nancy Rubin Per:...
AI summary The document outlines an agreement signed on May 28, 2012, by various parties including Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, the Consumer Advocate, the Small Business Advocate, and the Canadian Oil Heat Association. The agreement includes signatories and their respective representatives.
16. ENSC and COHA-NS agree that: - a) COHA-NS will be recognized as a stakeholder in future proposed DSM programs and that oil heat options will be considered for inclusion in energy efficiency and conservation programs; and - b) Outside t...
AI summary ENSC and COHA-NS agree to recognize COHA-NS as a stakeholder in future DSM programs, including oil heat options, and to engage provincial representatives on incentives for high-efficiency condensing oil heating furnaces outside electricity ratepayer programs.
PRELIMINARY ISSUES LIST The following issues will be dealt with in the public hearing on Efficiency Nova Scotia's ("ENS") Application for approval of its electricity Demand Side Management (HDSM") Plan for 2013-15: - 1. Proposed 2013-15 DS...
AI summary The document outlines preliminary issues for a public hearing on Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) 2013-15 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. Key topics include the DSM Plan's appendices, cost allocation methods, evaluation of past programs, CFL disposal, financing strategies, savings evaluation baselines, cost recovery riders, and the structure of a new DSM Advisory Group.
ELECTRICITY DEMAND SIDE M.ANAGEENT PLAN FOR 2013 - 2015
AI summary This document outlines the Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for Nova Scotia from 2013 to 2015, focusing on strategies to manage electricity demand through conservation and efficiency measures.
1 2012 NSUARB-E-ENSC-R-12 5 NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT and - MATTER OF: IN APPLICATION AN Corporation, To: Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation c/o Sean Foreman Wickwire Holm 2100-1801 Hol...
AI summary This document contains a series of requests submitted in a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, asking for detailed information on avoided costs, expenditure adjustments, assumptions, and program proposals. The proceeding involves Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and Multeese Consulting Inc. as key entities.
INFORMATION REQUESTS to ENSC from Bowater Mersey NON-CONFIDENTIAL a plan why 1 million in 2014, and $45.1 ENSC 3, plan, is it ENSC's the UARB implementation? If If is a If ENSC is required to file a be approved Request IR-1 Reference: ENSC...
AI summary Bowater Mersey requests information from ENSC regarding energy efficiency plans, including a trigger mechanism for corrective action if savings fall below 75% of forecasts, funding levels for 2014-2015, and spending limits without carry-over. ENSC proposes a multi-year budget with annual spending caps requiring UARB approval.
1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Please provide details of how ENSC plans to obtain the stakeholder views on program design and implementation that was formerly provided by the Program Development Working Group. 4 5 Request IR-2: 6 7 Please describe th...
AI summary The document outlines several requests related to energy efficiency programs, including stakeholder engagement, program design, program breakdowns, load forecasts, and the impact of multi-year versus one-year programs on cost tests.
2 Please explain exactly how ENSC proposes to update the 3 CP kW Demand allocator and the MWh 3 Energy Requirement in Attachment 1-1 of Appendix C in actual cost-recovery filings. 4 a. What sales values would be used in the adjustment in n...
AI summary The text presents a request for clarification on how ENSC proposes to update the 3 CP kW Demand allocator and the MWh requirement, and questions regarding the allocation of costs based on system benefits and the impact of energy-efficiency programs on billing tables.
16 Request IR-6 - The benefits of the programs are shown in terms of energy savings (GWh) and demand savings17 - (MW), but the dollar Lifetime Benefits are shown as a single number ($million, second column).18 - Please provide ENSC Evidenc...
AI summary The request asks ENSC to provide evidence tables (4.1-4.4) that separate Lifetime Benefits into demand and energy savings, as currently aggregated as a single figure.
17 Request IR-13 - Reference: ENSC Evidence, p.23, lines 4-5, states that "…[C]onservation and energy18 - efficiency [are] a lower-cost alternative to new supply".19 - (a) What assumptions were made about NSPI's need for new supply?20 - (b...
AI summary The text references ENSC's assertion that conservation and energy efficiency are lower-cost alternatives to new supply, and poses two questions regarding NSPI's assumptions about new supply needs and its forecast reserve margin from 2012-2017.
mented the same energy efficiency measures without the program" or have "implemented the energy efficiency measures at the same time without the program," which are the questions proposed to be asked. Asking participants if they would have...
AI summary Bowater Mersey criticizes Efficiency Nova Scotia's proposed method for identifying free-riders in an energy efficiency program, arguing that the questions may be self-defeating as participants would likely claim they wouldn't have implemented the programs without incentives. Bowater suggests an alternative question to assess whether DSM incentives divert funds from other projects or encourage new improvements.
MERRICK JAMIESON STERNS WASHINGTON & MAHODY BARRISTERS January 30, 2012 VIA EMAIL 25978 Tanya Bolivar Administrative Assistant to Chuck Faulkner Director, Efficiency Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Dear Ms. Bolivar:
AI summary A letter dated January 30, 2012, from the law firm Merrick Jamieson Sterns Washington & Mahody to Tanya Bolivar, Administrative Assistant to Chuck Faulkner, Director of Efficiency Programs at Efficiency Nova Scotia. The communication is referenced as 25978 and sent via email.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Request IR-28: Please provide an explanation of why Figure 4.1 - 2013-2015 DSM Plan Savings and Investment including...
AI summary The Consumer Advocate (CA) requests clarifications on discrepancies in ENSC's revised DSM Plan, including unexplained increases in investment without commensurate energy savings, higher sub-program costs, comparisons with past IRPs, and definitions of terms like 'No New DSM' and 'Without Future DSM' in load forecasts. The CA questions the rationale for cost differences and data inconsistencies.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-32: 2 3 4 Please provide a breakdown of actual and forecast administration costs for the DSM for the years 2011 to 2015 inclusive, including number of employees, total salary costs, consultants, travel and off...
AI summary The text contains several requests for information related to the administration costs of the DSM program, management audits, fuel cost allocation methods, and the impact of energy efficiency programs on customer usage. These requests are part of a regulatory proceeding involving ENSC.
2013-2015 DSM Plan (AJ]IDeIJIOIX 1. 3 plannIng" cost n Ilr"..... n~·"ff"'_ measures or
AI summary Fragment of a 2013-2015 DSM Plan document with incomplete text referencing planning costs and measures. Context includes Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency programs and stakeholder entities.
1.1 2012 DSM Programs ENSC programs and services exceeded savings target in 2012. Savings from all demand-side management programs were 158.9 GWh in 2012, compared to the 2012 target of 124.2 GWh. These savings included contributions from...
AI summary ENSC exceeded 2012 DSM savings targets (158.9 GWh vs. 124.2 GWh), driven by Residential and BNI sector contributions. Marketing efforts boosted participation, social media engagement, and customer satisfaction (89% overall, 96% recommendation rate). Success attributed to new programs like Residential Direct Install.
1.2 Residential Sector Results The Existing Houses program achieved energy savings of 50.4 GWh in 2012 compared to its target of 29.5 GWh, largely due to contributions from the Residential Direct Install service, which achieved savings of...
AI summary The Residential Sector Results highlight significant energy savings from programs like Existing Houses and Residential Direct Install, achieving 50.4 GWh in 2012. Energy efficiency upgrades were completed in 28,397 homes, with low-income initiatives expanding. Efficient Products saved 17.9 GWh, including 6.8 GWh from Appliance Retirement. LED campaigns and the Home Energy Assessment contributed to savings, while New Houses achieved 4.9 GWh of savings. The Home Energy Report service is set to launch in 2013.
1.3 Business, Non-Profit and Institutional Sector Results The Small Business Direct Install program includes the former Small Business Energy Solutions program, the former Commercial Direct Install program component, and an LED Retail init...
AI summary Nova Scotia's energy efficiency programs achieved significant energy savings in 2012. The Small Business Direct Install program exceeded its target, while the Prescriptive Rebates program expanded offerings and increased savings. The Custom program, including EMIS and EEM initiatives, achieved 33.6 GWh savings. EEMs were deployed across multiple organizations, identifying over 10 GWh in potential savings.
1.4 Codes and Standards ENSC's evaluator reported on the energy savings associated with new Codes and Standards in the Nova Scotia market. Eight new standards were considered: - Electric motors - General service incandescent reflector lamp...
AI summary ENSC evaluated eight new energy codes and standards in Nova Scotia, reporting 16.4 GWh savings for five standards but unable to assess others due to data gaps. ENSC leads national energy efficiency initiatives, including the Building Energy Estimation Methodology (BEEM) project and the National Market Study on fenestration products, supported by organizations like the Strategic Resource Task Group (SRTG) and the Steering Committee on Performance Energy Efficiency and Renewables (SCOPEER).
1.5 2012 Enabling Strategies ENSC launched a financing program for Solar and Fuel Substitution participants in September 2012. Participants of this program received zero-percent financing instead of rebates. In December, the lending partne...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) launched a zero-percent financing program for Solar and Fuel Substitution in 2012, later re-launched after a partner withdrawal. ENSC also conducted LED Holiday Light Exchanges, hosted the Bright Business Conference, developed the Trade Ally program and Efficiency 101 presentations, and initiated the Technical Reference Manual (TRM) with Navigant Consulting. These initiatives aimed to promote energy efficiency, engage businesses, and standardize energy savings calculations.
4 4. 2013 PLANNED ACTIVITIES 5 In 2013, ENSC will continue to build on its success from 2012, maintaining its focus on building a culture of energy efficiency in Nova Scotia through the enabling of energy savings while providing quality cu...
AI summary In 2013, ENSC will continue to focus on building a culture of energy efficiency in Nova Scotia through enabling energy savings and providing quality customer service. Specific initiatives are outlined in different sections, with Figure 2 showing mid-course adjustments.
4.1 Residential Programs and Services In 2013, ENSC plans to build on its 2012 successes in the Residential sector. In efforts to reduce participation barriers for residential services, 2013 will see the initiation and piloting of a Person...
AI summary ENSC plans to launch a Personal Energy Planner (PEP) service in 2013 to assist homeowners facing non-financial barriers to home upgrades. The initiative includes staff support for contractor quotes, upgrade management, and rebate acquisition, aligning with ENSC's 2013-2015 DSM Plan and customer-centric approach.
4.1.1 Efficient Product Rebates Efficient Product Rebates consists of both instant-rebate services and rebates provided for the retirement of old, inefficient appliances. In 2013, a number of strategies will be tested in the instant-rebate...
AI summary Efficient Product Rebates includes instant rebates and appliance retirement incentives. In 2013, ENSC will test expanded in-store rebate strategies and longer campaign periods, and explore CFL recycling. The program will focus on LED lamps to drive market transformation, building on 2012 rebate success.
4.1.2 Existing Residential ENSC's Existing Residential program consists of services focused on building envelope retrofits, direct installation of low-cost energy-efficient technologies, and rebates for installation of larger energy-effici...
AI summary ENSC's Existing Residential program offers building retrofits, direct installations, and rebates. In 2013, ENSC will enhance services with zero-interest financing and marketing. The Green Heat program shifts focus to renewable energy (wood/pellets) and excludes natural gas/propane. Low-income and medium-income assistance continues with targeted outreach.
4.2 Business, Non-Profit and Institutional Programs and Services In 2013 and 2014, ENSC will continue its work in building energy efficiency considerations into Business, Non-profit and Institutional (BNI) customers' decision-making proces...
AI summary ENSC aims to enhance energy efficiency among BNI customers in 2013-2014 by promoting customer ownership, energy monitoring systems, and long-term energy management planning. The organization will adapt to federal lighting standards and invest in emerging technologies to drive cultural change in energy efficiency.
4.2.1 Efficient Product Rebates ENSC's 2013 plans for Efficient Product Rebates, which includes both mail-in rebates and point-of-sale discounts on over 100 product types ranging from LED strip lighting to dairy farm heat recovery units, w...
AI summary ENSC's 2013 Efficient Product Rebates plan continues with mail-in and point-of-sale discounts on over 100 products, aiming to improve customer access via online tools and a trade portal. Expansion into BNI markets is prioritized through research, targeting commercial kitchens, agriculture, and commercial laundry sectors.
4.2.3 Direct Installation In its continuing evolution to meet the needs of customers, the Small Business Direct Install program has become more comprehensive and is now referred to as "Direct Installations" or "Business Energy Solutions" i...
AI summary The Small Business Direct Install program has evolved into 'Direct Installations' or 'Business Energy Solutions' to broaden customer reach. ENSC plans to expand non-lighting measures, explore zero-interest financing for municipal utility customers, and adapt to 2014 federal lighting standards.
4.3.1 Education and Outreach The focus of ENSC's education and outreach efforts in 2013 will be on connecting with Nova Scotians on their own terms, in communities that may not easily be reached otherwise. Doing so puts a human face on Eff...
AI summary ENSC's 2013 education and outreach initiatives focus on community engagement, expanding energy efficiency programs, collaborating with Habitat for Humanity, developing trade ally programs, and hosting an international conference. Efforts aim to make energy efficiency accessible and socially normative through digital media and local events.
6. ITEMS ARISING FROM THE 2013-2014 DSM PLAN STAKEHOLDER AGREEMENT
AI summary This section outlines items from the 2013-2014 DSM Plan Stakeholder Agreement, which likely involves regulatory considerations for energy efficiency programs, stakeholder collaboration, and implementation of demand-side management initiatives in Nova Scotia.
Appendix A-4 ENSC 2013 APR
AI summary This document refers to Appendix A-4 of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) 2013 Annual Performance Report (APR). It likely contains detailed information related to ENSC's performance, programs, or initiatives during the 2013 reporting period.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA'S DUAL BASELINE PRACTICE 2 1
AI summary The document discusses Efficiency Nova Scotia's dual baseline practice within regulatory proceedings. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and the Utility and Review Board of Nova Scotia (UARB), focusing on energy efficiency programs and regulatory oversight.
INTRODUCTION 4 Efficiency Nova Scotia is committed to using the most accurate system of accounting for costs - 5 and benefits of achieving its energy savings. To this end, ENSC will use a dual baseline practice - 6 for calculating its ener...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) employs a dual baseline approach to calculate energy savings and costs for program planning. This method distinguishes between enhanced savings during the remaining useful life (RUL) of replaced equipment and regular savings afterward, while also comparing full costs of energy-efficient and baseline equipment over time.
APPLICATION Because of the work required to implement a dual baseline practice, Efficiency Nova Scotia will implement it in a staged approach over the next two years:
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia will implement a dual baseline practice in a staged approach over two years due to the complexity of the required work.
2013: - o Processes and tracking mechanisms, including the development of assumptions for RULs of existing equipment and future costs of baseline equipment, will be developed for the Custom Retrofit and Business Energy Solutions programs....
AI summary Processes and tracking mechanisms for the Custom Retrofit and Business Energy Solutions programs will be developed, including assumptions for RULs of existing equipment and future costs. Data collection will begin in 2014, and research on air source heat pumps and dual baseline approaches will be conducted. Efficiency Nova Scotia's planning model will be modified to accommodate dual baseline for savings and costs.
INTRODUCTION This document provides a summary of the evaluation of the 2012 electric demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. Econoler was mandated to conduct this evaluation for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). Esta...
AI summary This document summarizes the evaluation of the 2012 electric demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. Econoler evaluated ENSC's programs, finding total net energy savings of 158.867 GWh and demand savings of 33.902 MW, with additional savings from Codes and Standards initiatives.
Table 3: 2012 On-Site Visits On-Site Visits Completed in 2012 Program Participant Sites Retailer Stores Recycler Appliance Retirement (ARet) 3 1 Instant Savings 20 Home Energy Assessment (HEA) 2 Fuel Substitution 8 Low Income Homeowner Ser...
AI summary Table 3 presents the number of on-site visits completed in 2012 across various energy efficiency and appliance retirement programs in Nova Scotia, including details on participant sites, retailer stores, and recyclers involved in these initiatives.
Table 4: 2012 Telephone Surveys Surveys Completed in 2012 Program Participants Builders Appliance Retirement (ARet) 201 Instant Savings 164 Home Energy Assessment (HEA) 80 Fuel Substitution 75 Low Income Homeowner Service (LIHS) Performanc...
AI summary Table 4 presents the number of surveys completed in 2012 across various energy efficiency and demand-side management programs in Nova Scotia. The data highlights participation levels in initiatives such as Appliance Retirement, Home Energy Assessment, and Business Energy Rebates, among others.
The impact evaluations integrated findings from the literature review, tracking sheets, interviews with program partners, on-site visits and/or surveys, depending on the type of data collection activities considered necessary. Moreover, th...
AI summary The impact evaluations used various methods, including literature reviews, tracking sheets, interviews, on-site visits, and surveys. The HEA, LIHS, and Performance Plus evaluations used HOT2000 simulation calibration analyses with billing data. On-site visits were conducted for all programs, with some used to validate parameters like installation rates and hours of operation. More sites were visited in 2012 to ensure reliable data collection.
2.1 OVERVIEW It is the opinion of Econoler that the portfolio of programs evaluated in 2012 was run efficiently and at a satisfactory level overall. In 2012, ENSC's program portfolio achieved a total of 158.867 GWh in net energy savings an...
AI summary Econoler evaluated ENSC's 2012 program portfolio, noting that it was efficient and achieved 158.867 GWh in net energy savings and 33.902 MW in net demand savings, an increase from 2011 levels.
Table 7: Program Performance as Net Energy and Demand Savings at the Generator 2011 2012 DSM PROGRAM Energy GWh Demand MW Energy GWh Demand MW RESIDENTIAL ARet 7.175 1.144 6.795 0.999 Appliance Replacement 0.548 0.065 Instant Savings 13.80...
AI summary Table 7 presents program performance data for energy and demand savings from 2011 to 2012, including contributions from residential and BNI programs. The table includes specific programs like ARet, HEA, and BES, and highlights overall net energy and demand savings achieved by C&S.
The achievement of such savings for 2012 was mainly attributable to the increased internal and external capacity, as well as strengthened marketing efforts. Notably, in 2012, ENSC managed to launch new programs following successful pilots....
AI summary In 2012, ENSC achieved increased energy efficiency savings due to expanded program offerings, improved marketing, and the introduction of new federal C&S regulations. The Evaluator noted significant improvements to the program portfolio since 2011, including new tools for performance management and increased participant satisfaction.
Appliance Retirement The evaluated net savings of ARet fell short of those tracked by ENSC by 13 percent. This result is mainly due to the revision of the unitary savings values for each type of appliance. The revised unitary savings value...
AI summary The evaluated net savings of the Appliance Retirement program (ARET) were 13% lower than those tracked by ENSC, primarily due to revised unitary savings values for refrigerators and freezers, which were affected by newer units being retired. Additionally, the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) increased from 0.79 to 0.84 due to lower free-ridership.
Instant Savings The net evaluated energy savings of Instant Savings exceeded those tracked by ENSC by 6 percent although some unitary savings values were revised downward. The main element that explains this result is the difference betwee...
AI summary The Instant Savings program's net evaluated energy savings exceeded ENSC's tracking by 6%, primarily due to changes in the NTGR for CFLs and a lower freeridership rate. The inclusion of outdoor installation percentages improved the accuracy of savings evaluation.
Home Energy Assessment For HEA, both the energy and demand savings calculated for this evaluation are higher than the tracked savings, by 12 percent and 11 percent respectively. For the energy savings, this difference can be explained main...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) shows energy and demand savings are 12% and 11% higher than tracked savings, due to an updated calculation method using a larger sample size and adjustments for electric thermal storage systems.
Low Income Homeowner Service For LIHS, both the energy and demand savings calculated for this evaluation are practically identical to the tracked savings. On the one hand, an adjustment was made to the gross energy savings per EnerGuide po...
AI summary For the Low Income Homeowner Service (LIHS), energy and demand savings calculated for the evaluation are nearly identical to tracked savings. Adjustments were made to gross energy savings per EnerGuide point and unitary savings for prescriptive measures, which balanced each other out.
Performance Plus For Performance Plus, both the energy and demand savings calculated for this evaluation are higher than the tracked savings by 19 percent and 18 percent respectively. This difference can mainly be explained by the adjustme...
AI summary Performance Plus program's energy and demand savings are 19% and 18% higher than tracked savings, primarily due to an adjustment in the gross energy savings per EnerGuide point from 817 kWh to 914 kWh, based on the 2012 HEA evaluation. Solar DHW systems were treated as a prescriptive measure, impacting the savings calculation.
LED Holiday Light Exchange Although the unitary savings value was revised upward due to an increase in the average daily usage assumption for the LED holiday lights installed, the net evaluated energy savings fell short of the tracked savi...
AI summary The LED Holiday Light Exchange program's energy savings were lower than expected, with net evaluated savings falling 7% short of tracked savings due to an interactive effects factor. Demand savings were even more significantly lower by 60%, attributed to the inclusion of a diversity factor.
Business Energy Solutions Overall, the net energy savings evaluated for BES fell short of those tracked by ENSC by 2 percent. This result can be explained by the adjustments applied in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) gross savin...
AI summary The net energy savings for Business Energy Solutions (BES) were 2% lower than those tracked by ENSC, due to adjustments in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) gross savings calculation. Additionally, differences in demand savings evaluation arose from the application of a diversity factor of 80% by Econoler.
3 OVERALL RECOMMENDATIONS This section presents general recommendations for the program portfolio. These recommendations are generally considered good practices and can be applied to most ENSC programs. They are aimed specifically at enhan...
AI summary This section outlines general recommendations for the program portfolio managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). The recommendations focus on improving program documentation, data management, and implementation and evaluation practices, aiming to enhance overall program effectiveness.
Table 11: General Recommendations on ENSC Program Manuals No. Recommendations
AI summary The document presents a table titled 'General Recommendations on ENSC Program Manuals,' which outlines recommendations related to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) program manuals. However, the table is empty and does not contain specific recommendations or details.
3.2 DATA TRACKING Data tracking and reporting are crucial for program management as well as for evaluation purposes. In 2010, ENSC implemented an online Demand-Side Management Data System (DSMDS), and has been working on its improvement si...
AI summary Data tracking and reporting are critical for program management and evaluation. ENSC implemented the DSMDS in 2010 but it had limitations, particularly in generating comprehensive reports. Econoler used tracking sheets for the 2012 evaluation and noted improvements since 2011, though challenges remain in validating savings calculations. Recommendations were made to improve data consistency and support the DSMDS development.
3.3 EVALUATION PLAN The evaluation plan identifies key variables that must be collected as part of program operations in order to make it possible to evaluate the program. In 2011, the Evaluator noticed that ENSC's programs did not have su...
AI summary The evaluation plan is a critical component of program operations, ensuring the collection of key variables for assessment. ENSC adopted an evaluation plan template in 2011, improving program documentation and enabling effective evaluations. The Evaluator recommends further improvements to enhance the evaluation process.
4.1.1 Appliance Retirement The 2012 evaluation of ARet demonstrated that the program is well designed and that it underwent a series of positive changes aimed at improving its design and implementation. Notably, the program has excluded de...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program found it well-designed with positive changes, including the exclusion of dehumidifiers and the inclusion of AIR MILES® reward points. Improvements in logistics, communication, and participant satisfaction were noted, along with significant energy and demand savings achieved in 2012.
Table 15: Recommendations for Appliance Retirement No. Recommendations ARet-R1. Continue marketing efforts and perform targeted marketing in rural communities: The ARet marketing campaign has improved since the last evaluation to include m...
AI summary The ARet marketing campaign has improved with various mediums and a brochure on appliance disposal. Partners and survey results indicate satisfaction with current marketing efforts, and the Evaluator recommends continuing these efforts, particularly in rural communities to increase market penetration.
The 2012 evaluation of Instant Savings demonstrated that the program works well overall and constitutes the right approach in a market transformation and resource acquisition perspective. Additions were made to the program to help improve...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Instant Savings program showed that it functions well and is effective in market transformation and resource acquisition. Improvements included increased discounts, more eligible products, and enhanced marketing strategies. ENSC's efforts in marketing and advertising improved program awareness and partner satisfaction. Retailers and customers positively responded to in-store signage and promotional tools.
th customers regarding the program and the discount. Retailers also provided positive feedback regarding the program marketing as they indicated being satisfied with the look of the promotional tools. The DA and the retailers interviewed p...
AI summary The Instant Savings program received positive feedback from retailers and the DA regarding its marketing and overall satisfaction. However, challenges remain in involving store personnel and expanding the range of eligible products, particularly refrigerators and LED products. The program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012, with recommendations from Econoler focusing on improving retailer engagement and product eligibility.
Table 16: Recommendations for Instant Savings No. Recommendations Instant-R3. Focus on LED products going forward with the program: Some retailers recommended upgrading the lighting offer under Instant Savings. Indeed, they believe that LE...
AI summary The table recommends focusing on LED products for the Instant Savings program, citing declining demand for CFLs and high free-ridership levels. ENSC added LED recessed downlight fixtures in 2012, and Econoler suggests removing regular CFLs from eligibility by 2014.
The 2012 evaluation of HEA demonstrated that the program underwent a series of changes that altered its design and implementation. In addition to the withdrawal of the federal government from the program, modifications were made to the for...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program showed significant changes in design and implementation, including the removal of mechanical heating system rebates and the introduction of new tools for program management. Partners noted a lack of collaboration from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and issues with the HOT2000 software.
T2000 software by NRCan. They reported that the software still contained several deficiencies and that NRCan should grant more human resources to finally fix this issue. When asked about the program marketing and outreach activities, the m...
AI summary The evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program in 2012 showed an increase in participants and energy savings compared to 2011. Program partners were satisfied with marketing improvements and suggested continuing aggressive outreach. Econoler recommended enhancing information on program measures and noted the absence of internal spillover in 2012.
Table 17: Recommendations for Home Energy Assessment No. Recommendations HEA-R1. Strengthen the relationship with the DAs: The interviews with the DAs revealed that there is still improvement to be made in terms of communication between EN...
AI summary The document recommends strengthening communication between Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Delivery Agents (DAs) to improve program modifications and support. It emphasizes the need for advance notifications, consultation, and open communication channels. Econoler supports these efforts and highlights the 2013 launch of a Trade Allies Internet portal as a positive step.
The 2012 evaluation of Fuel Substitution found that the transition from a pilot to a component of the Existing Houses program was successful. Participants expressed high levels of satisfaction with the program overall, as well as with its...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Fuel Substitution program showed increased participant satisfaction and program improvements, including new tools for management and enhanced upstream promotion. ENSC's efforts raised program awareness, reducing free-ridership from 42% in 2011 to 32% in 2012. The program had 282 participants in 2012, generating energy and demand savings comparable to the previous year.
Table 18: Recommendations for Fuel Substitution No. Recommendations Fuel-R3. Consider conducting calibrated simulations with participants who installed a wood or pellet stove: Wood and pellet stoves are by far the largest contributors of t...
AI summary The text recommends conducting calibrated simulations with participants who installed wood or pellet stoves to review unitary savings values and demand savings based on load profiles, as these stoves account for a significant portion of energy savings in the Fuel Substitution program.
The 2012 evaluation of LIHS demonstrated that the program is well designed and important to ENSC's program portfolio, considering that it targets customers who generally do not have the financial resources to undertake deep home energy ret...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Low Income Homeowner Service (LIHS) program showed that it is well-designed and essential for ENSC's portfolio, targeting low-income customers who cannot afford deep energy retrofits. The program had 811 participants in 2012, with some improvements needed in advisor training and insulation assessments. Energy savings were reported at 2.209 GWh and 1.047 MW in 2012, although these figures differ from 2011 due to changes in program structure.
Table 19: Recommendations for Low Income Homeowner Service No. Recommendations LIHS-R1. Consider the possibility of providing technical support for HOT2000: A great majority of the EAs reported a lack of collaboration and support from NRCa...
AI summary The table outlines recommendations for improving Low Income Homeowner Service (LIHS), focusing on providing technical support for HOT2000 software and implementing a continuous simulation review process to improve the quality of EnerGuide ratings and address errors in data collection and building simulations.
s left up to them. Most of the program partners agreed that people should be more informed about the assessment process, energy efficiency in general and the impact the implemented measures will have. On-site visits were also conducted to...
AI summary The evaluation of the Performance Plus program found that it achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012 compared to 2011. Econoler reviewed the program's procedures, EAs' assessments, and net savings calculations, recommending improvements based on findings such as free-ridership and spillover effects.
Table 20: Recommendations for Performance Plus No. Recommendations PP-R1. Provide participants with more information on the measures recommended: Survey results revealed that participants wish to obtain more information on the measures rec...
AI summary Participants in the Performance Plus program expressed a need for more detailed information on recommended energy efficiency measures to achieve their EnerGuide ratings. The Evaluator recommends providing this information, particularly in the HOT2000 report, to improve program outcomes and participant satisfaction.
The evaluation of RDI revealed that the transition from a pilot to a component of the Existing Houses program in July 2012 was successful. Indeed, participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with this component, as well as with its...
AI summary The evaluation of the Residential Direct Install (RDI) program found that its transition to the Existing Houses program was successful, with high participant satisfaction. However, marketing challenges, such as regional and demographic restrictions, were identified as barriers. DAs expressed satisfaction with ENSC staff but found program participation complex due to short timelines and operational demands.
se it required incorporating new parameters into a complex and widespread program within a short time frame, e.g. managing a large number of office and field staff while meeting weekly result targets. The program totalled 28,397 participan...
AI summary The RDI program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012 with 28,397 participants. Econoler evaluated the program, accounting for free-ridership and spillover effects, and provided recommendations based on the findings.
Table 21: Recommendations for Residential Direct Install No. Recommendations RDI-R2. Continue informing participants about energy-efficient products: The survey results showed that information or advice provided by the program advisor duri...
AI summary The table recommends continuing to provide participants with information about energy-efficient products during residential direct install programs, as survey results showed that such information influenced participants' decisions and encouraged energy-efficient behavior at home.
4.1.8 Multi-Unit Residential Buildings The 2012 evaluation of MURB demonstrated that the transition from a pilot to a component of the Existing Houses program has been successful overall. The Evaluator found major improvements to the progr...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Multi-Unit Residential Buildings (MURB) program showed significant improvements since 2011, including better tools, revised marketing strategies, and high installation rates. The program achieved 100% installation rates for CFLs and generated notable energy and demand savings. Econoler recommended continued improvements, particularly in recognizing building superintendents for their support.
Table 22: Recommendations for Multi-Unit Residential Buildings No. Recommendations MURB-R1. Analyze the possibility of rewarding building superintendents' support: The new marketing strategy, which involves direct collaboration with landlo...
AI summary The document recommends analyzing ways to reward building superintendents for their support in energy efficiency programs, continuing to provide information on energy efficiency to multi-unit renters, and collecting data on installed products per tenant unit for better planning and tenant engagement.
No. Recommendations MURB-R4. Improve the tracking sheet to facilitate field activities and provide a more precise evaluation of savings: Besides the fact that the information should be collected on a unit basis, the tracking sheet review a...
AI summary The recommendation focuses on improving the tracking sheet to enhance data collection for field activities and savings evaluation. It suggests implementing a protocol to ensure complete and systematic data recording, including additional fields such as CFL location, energy source for heating, and air conditioning use.
The 2012 evaluation revealed that Solar had generated net energy savings of 0.120 GWh at the generator. To calculate the net savings of Solar in 2012, Econoler not only reviewed the parameters used for estimating the unitary savings values...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation found that Solar generated 0.120 GWh in net energy savings. Econoler validated these savings through RETScreen simulations and on-site visits to ensure accuracy and consistency with the tracking sheet data. Key recommendations were made based on the evaluation results.
Table 23: Recommendations for Solar No. Recommendations Solar-R1. Complete a RETScreen simulation for all the projects to improve the accuracy of the deemed savings: The RETScreen simulation tool is very easy to use and understand. With ad...
AI summary The document recommends using RETScreen simulations for solar projects to improve deemed savings accuracy, suggests involving solar installers in this process, and proposes including participant surveys to estimate free-ridership if participation levels are high enough.
4.2.1 Business Energy Rebates The 2012 evaluation of BER demonstrated that the program had undergone a series of changes, creating an intensified impact on the market. In fact, BER has grown in both range and scale, expanding from offering...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program has expanded significantly since 2011, offering instant rebates through distributors and incorporating new eligible measures. It has improved program promotion, communication, and management tools, leading to increased awareness and satisfaction. The program achieved notable energy and demand savings in 2012. However, some distributors noted that other programs offered higher incentives for certain products, which may have limited BER's impact.
Table 24: Recommendations for Business Energy Rebates No. Recommendations BER-R1. Analyze product offering to reduce duplicate rebates and program overlapping in the market: Some eligible measures covered by the BER instant rebate approach...
AI summary The text discusses the need to analyze and adjust the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program to avoid duplicate rebates and program overlap with other BNI programs like BES and Custom Retrofit. It highlights that 37% of T8 lamps and 48% of ballasts eligible for BER instant rebates are already covered by other programs, suggesting a need to limit BER rebates to products with low market penetration, such as LED technologies.
No. Recommendations BER-R6. Standardize savings calculations for lighting products with typical baseline values: A statistical analysis of the adjustment ratios calculated for each of the 14 lighting projects visited for this evaluation de...
AI summary The text discusses the need to standardize savings calculations for lighting products due to high error margins caused by large variations in adjustment ratios. Econoler recommends using typical baseline values for each product type to simplify calculations and improve accuracy.
The 2012 evaluation of Custom Retrofit demonstrated that the program had undergone a series of positive changes that helped to improve and simplify its implementation and evaluation. Custom Retrofit was initially one of the two distinct co...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Custom Retrofit program highlighted improvements in its implementation and evaluation, including new tools and increased collaboration with contractors and professionals. The program's main source of awareness was ENSC's marketing and outreach, and participant satisfaction remained high, though wait times for eligibility and rebates were less satisfactory.
rogram overall and most of its aspects. The two aspects less satisfactory were the wait times required to confirm eligibility and receive rebates. Despite the above, satisfaction was generally strong. The program saw a total of 155 project...
AI summary The program overall was well-received, with high satisfaction levels, though wait times for rebate confirmation were a concern. In 2012, 155 projects were implemented, resulting in 28.941 GWh in net energy savings and 3.490 MW in demand savings. Evaluation methods included on-site visits and technical documentation reviews, with adjustments made for free-ridership and internal spillover.
Table 25: Recommendations for Custom Retrofit No. Recommendations Custom-R1. Consider diverting or assigning a proportion of the simple lighting retrofit projects to other prescriptive measure programs: When reviewing the project list of 2...
AI summary The document recommends diverting simple lighting retrofit projects to other BNI programs, such as BES, to improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness in managing these projects. These projects, which accounted for a significant portion of energy savings in 2012, could be better tracked and managed under different programs.
Table 26: Recommendations for Custom New Construction No. Recommendations NC-R2. Improve tracking and monitoring of project status and savings: The Evaluator ran into a number of difficulties when investigating the status of each project a...
AI summary Econoler recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) improve tracking and monitoring of custom new construction (NC) projects to better understand project status and savings. The current tracking system lacks detailed information, and some projects did not allow claiming savings in 2012.
The 2012 evaluation of BES demonstrated that the program is well-designed and generates important electric savings. The program underwent structural changes in 2012. Indeed, BES is now comprised of two components: SBES and CDI. SBES carrie...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Building Efficiency Program (BES) found it well-designed and effective in generating electric savings. The program was restructured into SBES and CDI in 2012, with SBES offering partial cost reimbursement and CDI providing no-cost support. ENSC was successful in program communication, with CDI participants learning about it more through ENSC, while SBES participants relied more on contractors and word of mouth. Both components achieved high participant satisfaction, though SBES had higher satisfaction levels. Participants suggested improvements such as increased advertising and faster processing.
Table 27: Recommendations for Business Energy Solutions No. Recommendations BES-R1. Improve the tracking sheet to allow for a better validation of savings: Both SBES and CDI tracking sheets show some improvements on last year's version. In...
AI summary The table outlines recommendations for improving the tracking sheet used in the Business Energy Solutions program. Key improvements include detailed tracking of lighting products, automatic savings calculations, and collecting specific data on insulation and heating sources to enhance validation and accuracy.
No. Recommendations CS-R2. Prepare a list of contact names that could provide market information specific to Nova Scotia: The Evaluator recommends that, for future evaluations, once ENSC knows which MEPS will be implemented during the targ...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends preparing a list of contact names, including manufacturers, distributors, and associations, to gather market-specific information for Nova Scotia. This is necessary because data from NRCan is national and not specific to any province, making it difficult to derive province-specific information.
APPENDIX I – BIBLIOGRAPHY Programs Bibliographic References Appliance Retirement (ARet) New York Department of Public Service, "Technical Resource Manual for Multifamily Replacement Refrigerators," September 29, 2010. Statistics Canada (CA...
AI summary The bibliography in Appendix I lists references for various energy efficiency programs, including appliance retirement initiatives and evaluations of energy-saving measures. It includes reports from organizations such as The Cadmus Group, Efficiency Vermont, and Econoler, and references standards and tools like the RETScreen simulation tool and the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol.
Programs Bibliographic References Hydro-Québec – Laboratoire des technologies de l'énergie (LTE), « Sommaire exécutif de rapports publiés par Hydro-Québec concernant les économies d'énergie dues aux thermostats électroniques, » October 200...
AI summary The text lists various programs and their associated bibliographic references, including studies on energy savings from electronic thermostats, water use, and residential energy efficiency. It references organizations like Hydro-Québec, Natural Resources Canada, and the Ontario Power Authority.
Programs Bibliographic References RETScreen International, "Normalized climate data for Halifax International Airport," Natural Resources Canada, 1997-2010. Veritec Consulting Inc., "City of Calgary Pre-Rinse Spray Valve Pilot Study," Fina...
AI summary The document presents a list of bibliographic references related to various energy efficiency programs and studies, including reports on pre-rinse spray valve pilot studies, transformer efficiency standards, and market analyses for external power supplies and standby power usage.
DEFINITIONS Base case A base case details the information on how assumed gross savings used in the tracking sheet have been established. Usually, these savings are calculated with a series of variables such as hours of operation, wattage o...
AI summary This section defines key terms related to energy efficiency programs, including base case, demand savings, distortion effects, and net-to-gross ratio. It provides clear explanations of concepts such as evaluated savings, free-ridership, and interactive effects, which are important for program evaluation and measurement.
2012 Evaluation Report Sampling error The amount of inaccuracy in estimating some value that is caused by examining only a portion of a population (i.e. a sample) rather than the whole population. Sample size The number of observations or...
AI summary The 2012 Evaluation Report defines key terms related to statistical sampling and energy efficiency program evaluation, including sampling error, sample size, internal spillover, and tracked savings, with reference to document 5790 iv.
PROGRAM COMPONENT OVERVIEW ARet began as a pilot in 2010 in the Halifax and Cape Breton Regional Municipalities. It was designed to encourage the retirement of old household appliances, such as refrigerators, freezers and room air conditio...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, initiated in 2010, encourages Nova Scotians to retire old appliances by offering incentives and free pickup services. The program expanded to all of Nova Scotia in 2011 and later changed in 2012, including the exclusion of dehumidifiers and the reorganization of delivery agents. The program aimed to achieve net electricity savings of 5.4 GWh and demand savings of 0.8 MW in 2012.
Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 9.875 GWh 0.79 7.801 GWh Evaluation Results 8.089 GWh 0.84 6.795 GWh Demand Savings Track...
AI summary The evaluated net savings from energy efficiency programs were 13% lower than the tracked savings, primarily due to revised unitary savings values for appliances. The revision was influenced by changes in the average age and usage factors of retired appliances, particularly affecting refrigerators and freezers.
RECOMMENDATIONS Econoler finds that the program works well overall and at a satisfactory level. In addition to the general recommendations presented for all ENSC programs in the overall executive summary of the 2012 demand-side management...
AI summary Econoler recommends continuing marketing efforts, exploring rebate adjustments, collecting more detailed appliance data, and pursuing metering activities for the ARet program to improve its effectiveness and accuracy in calculating energy savings.
3.2.1 Program Manual A program manual is an important tool for the entire program staff, as well as for the Evaluator. Indeed, it serves as a program memory and can be particularly useful in case of staff changes. The program manual is int...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of a program manual in managing energy efficiency programs, highlighting improvements made in the 2012 version compared to the 2011 format. It notes the use of a standardized template and the inclusion of recommendations such as documenting assumptions and practices.
3.2.2 Logic Model The logic model is a diagram representation of the program theory which describes 1) how the program is expected to work; and 2) how it contributes to the intended or observed outcomes. In 2012, ENSC made many changes to...
AI summary The logic model is a diagram that represents the program theory, showing how the program is expected to work and contribute to intended outcomes. ENSC updated its programs in 2012, and Econoler is working with ENSC to finalize updated logic models for each program, which will be included in program manuals soon.
eting towards a more allinclusive approach, which offers a full suite of energy saving services and rebates for customer. Over the last year, a focus was put on developing a customer-centric approach: - > Facebook: Launched in September 20...
AI summary The document discusses ENSC's marketing and outreach activities, including their Facebook page, new website features, email marketing strategies, and customer relationship management improvements aimed at promoting energy efficiency services and improving customer engagement.
3.3 TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of the ARet tracking sheet. It is to be noted that the tracking sheet reviewed by Econoler is an extract of the DA's online data management system. This specific form of the tracking sheet i...
AI summary Econoler reviewed the ARet tracking sheet, which is an extract from the DA's online data management system. The tracking sheet contains detailed information about participants and retired appliances, including contact details, appliance specifics, pickup dates, and data relevant for impact evaluation. It is noted that this form is not used by the PM for program monitoring.
3.5.1 Program Awareness and Enrolment Survey respondents were asked how they became aware of the program. Results indicated that participants found out about ARet a number of different ways. Advertising from ENSC was the primary source of...
AI summary Survey results show that 41% of participants learned about the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program through ENSC advertising, with word of mouth being another common source (35%).
Table 5: Sources of Program Awareness Sources of Program Awareness 2011 2012 Sample Size 90 201 TOTAL ADVERTISING 41% Utility/sponsor advertising in newspapers, on the radio, on TV 46% 30% Bill insert/mailing from utility/sponsor 21% 9% EN...
AI summary Table 5 outlines the sources of program awareness for energy efficiency initiatives between 2011 and 2012, showing changes in the effectiveness of various advertising and outreach methods. The majority of participants enrolled in the program over the phone.
Table 7: Ease of Program Enrolment by Phone and Online 2011 2012 Level of Ease of Program Enrolment Enrolled Online (#) Enrolled Over the Phone (%) Enrolled Online (%) Enrolled Over the Phone (%) Sample Size 13 77 49 148 5 – Extremely easy...
AI summary Table 7 shows that the majority of participants found program enrolment extremely easy, with high percentages reporting ease of enrolment online and over the phone. The survey also highlights that 84% found it extremely easy to schedule appliance pick-up, indicating an improvement in program accessibility.
3.5.2 Motivations and Barriers to Participation There were a number of reasons participants chose to retire their appliances through the program. Four in ten people (41%) indicated that the unit was not working well, while three in ten (31...
AI summary Participants in the appliance retirement program retired their appliances for various reasons, including the appliance not working well, rebate incentives, convenient pickup options, and a desire to reduce energy costs. Approximately 41% cited appliance malfunction, 31% were motivated by rebates, and 17% aimed to lower their energy costs.
Table 11: Concerns Prior to Taking Part in the Program Concerns 2011 2012 Sample Size 90 201 Yes 2% 1% No 97% 98% Don't know 1% 1%
AI summary Table 11 presents concerns prior to participation in a program, showing a high percentage of participants (97% in 2011 and 98% in 2012) indicating 'No' concerns, with minimal responses of 'Yes' (2% in 2011 and 1% in 2012) and 'Don't know' (1% in both years). The sample size increased from 90 in 2011 to 201 in 2012.
Table 13: Amount of Time Appliance was Plugged In 2011 2012 Time Plugged In Refrigerators Freezers (%) (%) Refrigerators (%) Freezers (%) Sample Size 26 39 37 80 All the time 62% 90% 54% 81% Most of the time 12% 3% 14% 4% Occasionally 19%...
AI summary Table 13 presents data on the amount of time appliances such as refrigerators and freezers were plugged in during 2011 and 2012, based on responses from participants in a program. The data includes percentages for different usage categories and sample sizes for each year.
Table 14: Air Conditioner Use 2012 Air Conditioner Use Air Conditioners Sample Size 36 Only when necessary 78% Generally running all the time 22% Base: Respondents who turned in an air conditioner to the program Don't know/Refused removed...
AI summary Table 14 presents data on air conditioner use in 2012, showing that 78% of respondents only used their air conditioners when necessary, while 22% generally ran them all the time. The sample size was 36, with only working appliances being collected through the program.
3.5.5 Importance of Secondary Appliance Respondents who retired a secondary refrigerator or freezer through the program were asked how important it was to have a spare refrigerator or freezer for household food storage. The results exhibit...
AI summary Respondents who retired a secondary refrigerator or freezer through the program had differing views on the importance of having a spare appliance for food storage. A secondary refrigerator was seen as moderately important, while a freezer was considered very important. These findings, along with replacement rates, highlight the significance of secondary appliances to consumers and may explain their reluctance to discard functional appliances.
3.5.6 Appliances Remaining in Home Those who had a refrigerator retired through the program generally have just one refrigerator remaining (69%), while three in 10 (28%) have two refrigerators remaining. In terms of those who had a freezer...
AI summary The text discusses the number of appliances remaining in homes after retirement through a program. Most participants have one or two refrigerators, one freezer, or no air conditioners left. Refrigerators remaining are generally new, with most being less than five years old.
3.5.7 Program Influence Participants were asked to rate the importance of various factors in their decision to retire an appliance through the program on a scale of '1' to '10', where '10' is extremely important. The removal and recycling...
AI summary Participants rated the importance of factors influencing appliance retirement through a program. Removal and recycling services were most valued, followed by information/advice and monetary incentives. The Evaluator suggests that the rebate amount could be reconsidered in future evaluations.
3.5.8 Program Impact The majority of participants (72%) reported that their interest in energy efficiency has improved since participating in the program. Participants noted a moderate level of improvement in terms of their knowledge of en...
AI summary The majority of participants (72%) reported improved interest in energy efficiency after participating in the program, with moderate improvements in knowledge of energy efficiency (53%), appliances (45%), and reduction in total energy costs (40%).
Table 24: Level of Improvement 2012 Level of Improvement Sample Size Improved Interest in energy efficiency 195 72% Your knowledge of energy efficiency improved 197 53% Your knowledge of appliances improved 197 45% Reduction in total energ...
AI summary Table 24 presents survey results on the level of improvement in energy efficiency knowledge and outcomes, showing varying percentages of respondents who felt improvements in energy efficiency, knowledge, and cost reductions.
Table 26: Overall Satisfaction with Program Satisfaction with Program 2011 2012 Sample Size 90 201 5 - Extremely satisfied 79% 85% 4 17% 10% 3 3% 4% 2 1 - Extremely dissatisfied 1% Don't know Average 4.7 4.8 Don't know/Refused removed from...
AI summary Table 26 presents overall satisfaction with a program from 2011 to 2012, showing high levels of satisfaction with 79% and 85% of participants extremely satisfied in each year, respectively. The average satisfaction score increased from 4.7 to 4.8, and nearly all participants would recommend the program to others.
Table 28: Recommendations for Improving Program in Future Recommendations 2011 2012 Sample Size 90 201 Better advertising/publicity/advertise the program more or in a better way 13% 7% Accept a wider variety of products 4% 5% Improve sched...
AI summary Table 28 outlines recommendations for improving a program based on responses from 2011 and 2012. The majority of respondents (71% in 2011 and 78% in 2012) felt no improvements were needed. Key recommendations included better advertising, accepting a wider variety of products such as stoves and washers, improving scheduling, and offering more product information.
4.1.1 On-Site Visit Sampling and Protocol Four on-site visits were conducted under the 2012 evaluation of ARet: one at the recycling facility and three at households that had retired old appliances in 2012. For the participating households...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program involved four on-site visits, including one at a recycling facility and three at households. Sampling was based on a tracking sheet with 4,500 participants who retired 5,119 appliances, mostly refrigerators. The selection aimed to cover various appliance types and quantities, with visits limited to the Halifax region.
4.2.1 Refrigerators For this year's evaluation, Econoler reviewed each parameter used in the unitary savings calculations of the refrigerators retired through the program, i.e.: - > average consumption of refrigerators retired through the...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the unitary savings calculations for refrigerators retired through the program, considering parameters such as average consumption, occupant adjustment factor, replacement ratio, and partial use factor for secondary refrigerators.
Average Consumption of Retired Refrigerators Econoler revised the annual consumption of the refrigerators retired through the program using the data from the 2011 metering activity. In total, the annual energy consumption of 38 refrigerato...
AI summary Econoler updated the annual energy consumption of refrigerators retired through the program using data from the 2011 metering activity, testing 38 refrigerators. The analysis considered cubic foot size and age of the refrigerators retired in 2012 to estimate an average consumption.
Replacement Ratio In the last evaluation, the unitary savings calculation took into account the replacement of refrigerators retired through the program. For the proportion of refrigerators that were replaced by a new unit after their reti...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used in calculating energy savings from a refrigerator replacement program. Previously, savings were calculated based on the difference between old and new refrigerators. This year, Econoler decided not to account for replacement ratios, arguing that appliances retired through the program are recycled and not reused, thus focusing only on the energy consumption of retired appliances.
4.2.2 Freezers Based on the same approach, Econoler revised the unitary savings value used for the freezers retired through the program. To do so, the following parameters were taken into consideration: - > average consumption of freezers...
AI summary Econoler revised the unitary savings value for freezers retired through the program by considering parameters such as average consumption, occupant adjustment factor, replacement ratio, and partial use factor.
Average Consumption of Retired Freezers To revise the annual consumption of the freezers retired through the program, Econoler used the data from the 2011 metering activity. In order to estimate an average consumption representative of the...
AI summary Econoler revised the annual consumption of retired freezers using 2011 metering data, analyzing energy consumption per cubic foot and manufacture year for 46 freezers to estimate an average representative of the program's retired freezers.
Partial Use Factors Secondary freezers are likely to be unplugged for a portion of the year. Therefore, partial use factors were developed to adjust the unitary savings calculations in accordance with the fact that not all freezers are ope...
AI summary Partial use factors are used to adjust unitary savings calculations for secondary freezers, which are not used year-round. The factors are calculated based on participant survey data, which estimates the time freezers are plugged in during the year, using four plug-in patterns: all the time, most of the time, occasionally, and never.
Unitary Savings Value Calculation The table below presents the variables that were used to calculate the unitary savings value for freezers. Starting with the average annual consumption value estimated for the retired freezers, the calcula...
AI summary The unitary savings value for retired freezers is calculated using average annual consumption, occupant adjustment factor, and partial use factor. The result is 950 kWh/year, a slight decrease from the 2011 value of 1,068 kWh/year, which did not account for a replacement ratio.
4.2.3 Room Air Conditioner Units Based on the 2011 evaluation, ENSC used a unitary savings value of 197 kWh per year for the room air conditioners retired through the program. This value was reviewed during this evaluation. Since onsite me...
AI summary The evaluation of room air conditioner units retired through the program used a unitary savings value of 197 kWh per year, which was reviewed based on limited onsite metering data. Econoler relied on literature and participant surveys, calculating an average annual consumption of 371 kWh using parameters from the OPA's 2008 program. The usage hours and capacity were validated against local climate data and participant behavior, and no replacement ratio was applied for this evaluation.
4.2.3 Revised Gross Savings Gross energy savings for the program were recalculated by the Evaluator to include the revised unitary savings values estimated for all types of appliances retired through the program. These adjusted unitary sav...
AI summary The Evaluator recalculated gross energy savings for the program by incorporating revised unitary savings values that consider appliance retirement proportions, occupant adjustment factors, and partial use factors. Demand savings were calculated using a 0.147 MW/GWh ratio, leading to total gross energy and demand savings of 7.354 GWh and 1.081 MW at the meter, and 8.089 GWh and 1.189 MW at the generator, using a line loss factor provided by Nova Scotia Power.
Table 36: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings Refrigerators Freezers Room AC Units Total Number of Units Units Retired – From Tracking Sheet 5,092 2,744 140 7,976 Energy Savings Unitary Savings (kWh) 922 950 371 - Total Gr...
AI summary Table 36 presents evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings from retired appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, and room AC units. The data includes energy savings at both the meter and generator levels, as well as demand savings calculated using a demand-to-energy ratio and line loss factors.
4.4.2 Internal Spillover The internal spillover effects were measured through the participant survey. For ARet, internal spillover can occur when participants decide to retire or replace other appliances on their own following their previo...
AI summary The internal spillover effects of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program were measured through a participant survey. Two participants reported retiring additional appliances after program participation, with the program's influence estimated at 100%. This resulted in an internal spillover level of 1%.
The demand and energy savings resulting from this evaluation were compared to the savings from the 2012 tracking sheet in the table below.
AI summary The text discusses a comparison of demand and energy savings from an evaluation to those from the 2012 tracking sheet, as presented in a table.
Table 39: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 9.875 GWh 0.79 7.801 GWh Evaluation Results 8.089 GWh 0.84 6.795 GWh Demand Savings Trac...
AI summary The evaluated net savings from energy efficiency programs were 13% lower than the tracked savings due to revised unitary savings values for appliances. The revision was influenced by factors such as the average age and use patterns of retired appliances, particularly affecting refrigerators and freezers. Room air conditioners saw higher unitary savings values due to a change in replacement ratio.
CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of ARet demonstrated that the program is well designed and that it underwent a series of positive changes aimed at improving its design and implementation. Notably, the program has excluded dehumidifiers from...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program highlighted its improved design and implementation, including the exclusion of dehumidifiers for cost-effectiveness and the inclusion of AIR MILES® reward points. The program's reorganization into two delivery agents increased participant satisfaction. ENSC's efforts in advertising, communication, and program promotion led to high participation and satisfaction levels, with 7,976 units retired in 2012 and significant energy and demand savings achieved.
APPENDIX I - RECOMMENDATIONS Sections Recommendations 2. Explore the possibility of lowering the rebate: Participants' survey responses revealed that the money incentive is the third factor influencing the decision to retire an appliance t...
AI summary The appendix recommends exploring the possibility of lowering rebate amounts in the appliance retirement program, based on survey findings that suggest incentives are the third most important factor in appliance retirement, following removal and recycling services and information provided.
Thank you! Part I: General Questions Please indicate your company name. Q1a. How would you describe your role(s) as an ENSC energy efficiency program partner? Q1b. How long have you held that role/those roles (specify months or years)? Q2a...
AI summary The text presents a section of a regulatory proceeding document containing general questions directed at ENSC energy efficiency program partners, asking about their roles, duration of involvement, and the complexity of their participation process.
Q3. On a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is very poor and 10 is excellent, please rate your satisfaction in regard to the: Aspects of the program Score 1 = very poor 10 = excellent NA = Not applicable Reason If you answered 8 or less, please s...
AI summary The document presents a survey with questions about satisfaction with various aspects of a program, including overall program satisfaction, marketing and outreach, and relationships with ENSC staff and the Call Centre. It also includes specific questions about the Appliance Retirement Program, modifications to the program, barriers to delivery, and complaints received.
2.2 Freezers (if applicable) Replacement Information (Participant declaration and on-site observations) Number of stand-alone freezers retired: Number replaced with a new freezer: - ENERGY STAR or not? - Smaller, Bigger or Same Size? - Cap...
AI summary The section provides a table for recording information about freezer replacements, including the number of freezers retired, replaced with new or used freezers, and details about their size and capacity. It also includes a table for secondary freezer usage and time plugged in.
INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _________ and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or...
AI summary CRA is conducting a survey to evaluate Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program, seeking feedback from participants who had appliances removed and recycled in 2012. The survey aims to improve the program and will take approximately 15 minutes, with responses kept confidential.
Verification and Recall (V Series) V1. Our records indicate that your household participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program, which removed and recycled [INSERT NUMBER FROM VARIABLE "RF" IN THE SAMPLE] refrigerator...
AI summary This section of the document verifies participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program, asking respondents to confirm the number of appliances (refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners) removed and recycled from their homes in 2012, and provides clarification about the program's details, including rebates and Air Miles rewards.
Program Administrator Sources - 1. (Bill insert/mailing from Efficiency Nova Scotia) - 2. (Efficiency Nova Scotia website) - 3. (Advertising in newspaper, radio, TV) - 4. (Social Media –Facebook) - 5. Contest "Nova Scotia's Worst Fridge" -...
AI summary The document outlines various sources used by the Program Administrator, including bill inserts, website advertisements, media campaigns, and social media, as part of their outreach and promotion efforts.
Energy/Environment - 14. (Better for the environment) - 15. (Wanted to recycle)
AI summary The text includes two brief points under the 'Energy/Environment' heading: 'Better for the environment' and 'Wanted to recycle', indicating a focus on environmental benefits and recycling initiatives.
Replacement Freezer Questions (FE Series) - FE1. Did you get another freezer to replace the one you turned in through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? - 1. Yes - 2. No [GO TO RFZ1] - 98. (Don't know) [GO TO RFZ1] - 99...
AI summary The document presents a series of questions related to the replacement of freezers under Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. It asks whether a freezer was received as a replacement and whether the replacement was new or used.
Air Conditioner Unit Free-Ridership [AFR Series] Please continue thinking about just that one air conditioner unit. - AFR1. Had you already considered disposing of the air conditioner unit before you heard about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Ap...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document asks respondents about their behavior regarding disposing of an air conditioner unit, specifically in relation to the Appliance Retirement Program offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explores whether the program influenced their decision to retire the appliance and how likely they were to have paid for the service themselves.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The $10 incentive provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. Information or advice received from the program Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused c. Removal and recycling s...
AI summary The text discusses customer responses to an appliance retirement program, focusing on incentives and services provided. It asks respondents about their likelihood of participating in the program without the financial incentive, highlighting the role of monetary and non-monetary factors in program participation.
Impact of Measures [IM Series] - IM1. Please indicate how each of the following has changed since participating in the Appliance Retirement Program? On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "no improvement" and 5 means a "considerable improveme...
AI summary The document outlines a survey (Impact of Measures [IM Series]) assessing the effects of the Appliance Retirement Program. It asks participants about improvements in energy costs, knowledge, and interest in energy efficiency, as well as any negative consequences experienced from the program and whether they would recommend it to others.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report March 5, 2013 December 3, 2012 Preliminary Report
AI summary The document presents a preliminary and final report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation dated March 5, 2013, and December 3, 2012, respectively. These reports likely contain analyses or findings related to energy efficiency programs or initiatives in Nova Scotia.
KEY FINDINGS The 2012 evaluation of Instant Savings demonstrated that the program constitutes the right approach in a market transformation and resource acquisition perspective. In terms of net energy savings at the generator, the program...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Instant Savings program showed it is an effective approach for market transformation and resource acquisition, generating 10.767 GWh in net energy savings, slightly less than the 13.802 GWh achieved in 2011.
Awareness and Marketing In order for the program to keep being successful in the years to come, program awareness constitutes an important aspect of the program strategy. Survey results showed that nearly six in ten CFL or LED buyers had h...
AI summary The Instant Savings program's success depends on effective awareness and marketing strategies. Surveys show high customer recognition of the program, with in-store promotions and customer engagement events contributing significantly. However, challenges remain, including difficulties in engaging store personnel and tight timelines for campaign preparation. Retailers also suggest expanding the range of eligible products to increase program impact.
Satisfaction In spite of the concerns mentioned above, the DA indicated being very satisfied with the program overall as well as with their relationship with the participating retailers and ENSC's team. Likewise, the retailers provided hig...
AI summary The DA expressed high satisfaction with the program and its relationship with retailers and ENSC's team. Retailers also provided positive feedback on various aspects of the program, including communication, support, and discount processing.
Table 1: Distortion Effects and Net-to-Gross Ratio Category of Product Free-Ridership Spillover NTGR Regular CFLs 59% 29% 0.70 Specialty CFLs - - 1.00 LED Lamps 33% 20% 0.87 CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washers 78% 48% 0.70 LED Distributed During In...
AI summary Table 1 presents the distortion effects and net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for various energy-efficient products, highlighting free-ridership and spillover percentages. The evaluation found that the Instant Savings program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012.
1 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) Instant Savings offers customers instant discounts at the cash register at more than 200 participating retailers when purchasing eligible energy-efficient products. Instant...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Instant Savings program provides customers with instant discounts on energy-efficient products at participating retailers. The program collaborates with a delivery agent and various retail chains, and it has undergone name changes over time, including 'Plug Into Savings' and 'Retail Markdown Program.'
Interviews with Retailers In October and November 2012, a total of 17 in-depth interviews were conducted with program retailers. Of the 17 retailers, eight were corporate retailers and nine were independent retailers. These interviews focu...
AI summary In 2012, 17 interviews with retailers were conducted to assess their experiences with efficiency programs, focusing on ENERGY STAR® CFLs, LED lamps, and CEE Tier 3 clothes washers. The study measured free-ridership for LED lamps and clothes washers and spillover effects for all three products, while CFL free-ridership was measured through intercept surveys.
2.2.4 In-Store Visits In the spring (May–June) and fall (October) of 2012, a total of 20 visits and observations were conducted by Econoler in various stores to gather qualitative information to describe the in-store client experience. Sev...
AI summary In 2012, Econoler conducted 20 in-store visits to assess the efficiency of instant rebates, product displays, and employee knowledge at seven major chain retailers. The findings were part of an evaluation of customer experience related to energy efficiency programs.
3.2.1 Program Manual A program manual is an important tool for the entire program staff, as well as for the Evaluator. Indeed, it serves as a program memory and can be particularly useful in case of staff changes. The program manual is int...
AI summary The Program Manual for the Instant Savings program has been updated to a standardized template with 10 sections, improving upon the 2011 format. It now includes documentation on program characteristics, eligible products, campaign periods, and parameters for estimating program objectives, as recommended by the Evaluator.
3.2.2 Logic Model The logic model is a diagram representation of the program theory which describes 1) how the program is expected to work; and 2) how it contributes to the intended or observed outcomes. In 2012, ENSC made many changes to...
AI summary The logic model represents the program theory of ENSC's programs, outlining how they are expected to function and contribute to outcomes. ENSC updated its programs in 2012, and Econoler is assisting in aligning the logic models with current strategies and performance indicators. Finalized models will be included in program manuals soon.
3.2.5 Marketing and Outreach Activities Instant Savings is a difficult program to evaluate by nature, since the identity of the participants is unknown. Hence, the marketing strategy must be comprehensive and be comprised of two vectors: T...
AI summary The Instant Savings program faces challenges in evaluation due to unknown participant identities. To address this, a comprehensive marketing strategy is implemented, including POP displays, social media engagement, customer events, and performance indicators. The Evaluator recommends making performance indicators more quantitative and revising the marketing plan periodically.
3.3 TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of ENSC's tracking sheet for Instant Savings. The tracking sheet for 2012 is very clear and useful. All recommendations from 2011 were incorporated into the 2012 tracking sheet, which makes...
AI summary Econoler reviewed ENSC's tracking sheet for the Instant Savings program, noting that the 2012 version was comprehensive and incorporated all 2011 recommendations. The tracking sheet includes detailed sales data, product information, and rebate discounts, though some inconsistencies were found for certain products due to manual rebate applications.
3.4 IN-STORE VISITS In the spring (May–June) and fall (October) of 2012, a total of 20 visits and observations were conducted in various participant stores to gather qualitative information to describe the in-store client experience. Seven...
AI summary In 2012, 20 in-store visits were conducted at seven major chain retailers to assess the efficiency of instant rebates, product displays, and employee knowledge related to energy efficiency programs. The findings from these mystery shopper observations are detailed in the following sections.
Efficiency of the Instant Rebates Awarded at the Counter During the spring campaign, the Evaluator found that most retailers visited automatically awarded customers a rebate at the cash register when a qualifying product was purchased. How...
AI summary During a spring campaign, most retailers automatically awarded instant rebates at the cash register for qualifying purchases, but issues were identified in two visits. In one case, no rebate was given despite eligible products, and in another, a required coupon was not displayed, leading to confusion for the shopper.
Product Promotional Display Of the ten stores visited, four participated in the customer engagement event. Overall, the in-store events were fine but not great. Only two out of four representatives were well informed about the products and...
AI summary The customer engagement event in four stores showed mixed results, with only two representatives well-informed about products and rebates. Promotional tools like stickers and signs were used but poorly placed in some areas, making it difficult for customers to identify eligible products for rebates.
Employees' Knowledge of the Products and Program Overall, the salespeople were aware of the Instant Savings campaign, and of the fact that rebates applied to various products offered. However, as mentioned above, the rebates were not alway...
AI summary Salespeople were generally aware of the Instant Savings campaign and rebates for various products, but sometimes struggled to clearly identify rebate amounts for different products, such as the difference between rebates for regular and specialty CFLs.
, eligible products and rebate amounts. This feedback from retailers confirmed what the DA had already noticed. Some retailers suggested communicating information progressively instead of all at once. Most retailers were satisfied with the...
AI summary Retailers provided feedback on the marketing and product selection of an energy efficiency program. They suggested improving communication strategies, increasing educational content, and enhancing customer engagement through events and mass media. Retailers also recommended expanding the list of eligible products and focusing more on LED products.
3.6.1 Program Awareness As part of the intercept survey conducted in participant retail stores, only consumers who purchased discounted products during in-market campaigns were interviewed. These discounted products specifically included E...
AI summary The intercept survey found that 58% of participants were aware of the Instant Savings program, with ENSC advertising being the primary source of awareness. Most participants learned about the program through in-store promotions, the ENSC website, newspapers, and radio.
Table 6: Discount Awareness 2012 Discount Awareness Overall CFL LED Purchasers Purchasers Sample Size 164 99 65 Yes, was aware of discount before paying 76% 70% 85% No, was not aware of discount before 24% 30% 15% paying Base: Respondents...
AI summary Table 6 shows that 76% of participants were aware of discounts before purchasing CFLs or LEDs, with higher awareness for LEDs (85%) compared to CFLs (70%). In-store signage, such as stickers and posters, was effective in communicating discounts to customers.
Table 7: In-Store Promotion Awareness 2012 In-Store Promotion Awareness CFL LED Overall Purchasers Purchasers Sample Size 120 65 55 Yes, saw stickers, shelf signs, posters 93% 91% 96% No, did not see stickers, shelf signs, posters 6% 8% 4%...
AI summary Table 7 presents data on in-store promotion awareness for CFL and LED products, showing high awareness rates among purchasers, with 93% overall awareness, 91% for CFL, and 96% for LED. The sample size was 120, with 65 for CFL and 55 for LED. A small percentage of respondents did not see promotional materials, and a minimal percentage were unsure.
The majority of participants have heard of ENSC, with almost nine in ten (87%) having heard of the organization.
AI summary The majority of participants, with 87% having heard of ENSC, are familiar with the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Table 8: ENSC Awareness 2012 ENSC Awareness CFL LED Overall Purchasers Purchasers Sample Size 164 96 61 Yes 87% 83% 90% No 12% 16% 8% Don't know 1% 1% 2% 3.6.2 Purchases
AI summary Table 8 presents ENSC awareness data from 2012, showing high awareness levels among CFL and LED purchasers. The data indicates that 87% of respondents were aware of ENSC, with slightly higher awareness among LED purchasers (90%) compared to CFL purchasers (83%).
Participants were asked the types of lamps they purchased. Of the 164 participants interviewed, six in ten purchased CFLs only (59%). Almost four in ten purchased LEDs only (37%), while four percent purchased both CFLs and LEDs. It should...
AI summary Of 164 participants surveyed, 59% purchased only CFLs, 37% purchased only LEDs, and 4% purchased both. The survey included only customers who bought discounted CFLs or LEDs.
Table 9: Type of Lamp Purchased CFLs/LEDs Purchased 2012 Sample Size 164 CFLs only 59% LEDs only 37% Both 4%
AI summary Table 9 provides a breakdown of the types of lamps purchased in 2012, showing that 59% were CFLs only, 37% were LEDs only, and 4% were both. The sample size was 164.
The number of CFL and LED lamps purchased by each participant was counted. Counts were done for individual lamps rather than packages of lamps. Overall and on average, participants purchased a higher number of CFLs than LEDs. On average, p...
AI summary The document reports that participants purchased more CFLs than LEDs, with an average of 7.7 CFLs and 4.0 LEDs per participant. Counts were based on individual lamps rather than packages.
Table 10: Number of CFLs/LEDs Purchased 2012 Number Purchased Overall CFL Purchasers LED Purchasers Both CFL/LED Purchasers CFLs Sample Size 103 96 n/a 7 1-2 CFLs 13% 14% n/a 3-4 23% 24% n/a 1 5-7 22% 23% n/a 1 8-10 24% 25% n/a 1 11 or mor...
AI summary Table 10 presents data on the number of CFLs and LEDs purchased by respondents in 2012, including sample sizes, distribution across purchase ranges, and average numbers of units purchased by CFL purchasers, LED purchasers, and those who purchased both.
In order to understand if lamps purchased during the program campaign were to replace existing CFLs, participants were asked if they have any CFLs currently installed in their home. Approximately one-half of participants have CFLs installe...
AI summary The analysis indicates that many participants already have energy-efficient lighting installed, and program rebates may be encouraging the purchase of LEDs. About 52% of participants have CFLs, 35% have both CFLs and LEDs, and 10% have only LEDs. Approximately 25% of LED purchasers did not previously have LEDs installed, suggesting the program may be influencing trial behavior.
Table 12: Number of CFLs Purchased on Day of Survey to Replace Current CFLs Number of CFLs Purchased on Day of Survey to Replace Current CFLs 2012 Sample Size 98 0 22% 1-2 23% 3-4 16% 5-7 10% 8-10 15% 11 or more 6% Don't know 6% Average 4....
AI summary Table 12 presents data on the number of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) purchased by respondents on the day of the survey to replace existing CFLs. The data shows a distribution across categories, with an average of 4.4 CFLs purchased per respondent.
3.6.3 Program Influence Participants indicated that the discount was important in influencing their decision to install energyefficient products. This was more so the case for those who bought LEDs (mean score of 8.0) than for those who bo...
AI summary Participants emphasized the importance of discounts in influencing their decision to install energy-efficient products, particularly LEDs, which had a higher mean score (8.0) compared to CFLs (6.7), likely due to the higher price of LEDs and the greater discount available for them.
Table 13: Importance of Discount in Influencing Installation 2012 Importance of Discount in Influencing Decision to Install Energy-Efficient Products CFL LED Purchasers Purchasers Sample Size 68 55 Mean (0=Had no influence at all, 10= extr...
AI summary Table 13 highlights the importance of discounts in influencing the installation of energy-efficient products, specifically comparing Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) and Light Emitting Diodes (LED). The mean importance score for LED was higher (8.0) compared to CFL (6.7), indicating that discounts had a greater influence on LED purchases.
Participants aware of other energy-efficient products discounted through the program mentioned a number of different products. These included motion sensors, programmable thermostats, outdoor timers, power bars or smart strips, hardwired d...
AI summary Participants identified various energy-efficient products offered through the program, including motion sensors, programmable thermostats, outdoor timers, power bars, smart strips, hardwired dimmer switches, LED lamps, and recessed downlights.
Table 15: Other Discounted Products Other Discounted Products 2012 Sample Size 31 Motion sensors 29% Programmable thermostats 29% Outdoor timers 26% Power bars or Smart strips 19% Hardwired dimmer switches 19% LED lamps and recessed downli...
AI summary Table 15 presents data on the distribution of other discounted products in 2012, including motion sensors, programmable thermostats, and LED lamps, among others. The data reflects responses from a sample size of 31, with percentages indicating the proportion of each product category.
Table 16: Which Products Should Be Discounted Which Products Should be Discounted 2012 Sample Size 73 Appliances 30% Heat pumps 12% Everything/Anything 11% Water heaters 8% Water saving devices/Low flow toilets/Low flow showerheads 8% Heat...
AI summary Table 16 presents survey data on which energy efficiency products respondents believe should be discounted. Appliances received the highest percentage of responses (30%), followed by heat pumps (12%) and 'everything/anything' (11%). Other products such as water heaters, water-saving devices, and solar panels received lower percentages.
4.2 GROSS SAVINGS The quantities of products sold through the spring and fall campaigns are all computed in the tracking sheet. For each category of product, ENSC uses the unitary savings values from last year's evaluation. These unitary s...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of gross savings from energy efficiency programs, specifically using unitary savings values from past evaluations and secondary data sources like the 2011 Ontario Power Authority report and the Efficiency Vermont Technical Reference Manual for new products introduced in 2012.
Tracked Savings In the tracking sheet, the quantity of CFLs sold through the program was recorded according to the type of CFLs: - > ENERGY STAR® regular CFLs; and - > ENERGY STAR® specialty CFLs. Last year's evaluation calculated an avera...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings from CFLs sold through the program. It details the displaced wattage, hours of operation, and the formula used to determine an average annual savings of 49.8 kWh per CFL.
Revised Savings This value was reviewed by Econoler during this evaluation. To do so, the Evaluator analyzed the information on CFL wattages recorded in the tracking sheet and conducted a literature review to validate the hours of operatio...
AI summary The revised savings value was evaluated by Econoler, who analyzed CFL wattages and hours of operation. Displaced wattage values for regular and specialty CFLs were calculated separately.
Displaced Wattage The displaced wattage of 50.5 watts was revised this year according to the new wattage values of the regular and specialty CFLs sold through the program in 2012. This information was provided by the retailers and was avai...
AI summary The displaced wattage of 50.5 watts was revised based on new wattage values of regular and specialty CFLs sold through the program in 2012. Retailers provided this data, which was available for 100% and 95.7% of all CFLs sold. The average displaced wattage was calculated by comparing the average wattage of CFLs with the average equivalent wattage of incandescent lamps replaced.
LIGHT OUTPUT EQUIVALENCY INCANDESCENT BULBS (WATTS) MINIMUM LIGHT OUTPUT (LUMENS) COMMON ENERGY STAR QUALIFIED LIGHT BULBS (WATTS) 40 450 9 то 13 60 800 13 TO 15 75 1,100 18 TO 25 100 1,600 23 то 30 150 2,600 30 ™ 52 Figure 2: Light Output...
AI summary This table provides light output equivalency between incandescent bulbs and compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), showing the minimum lumens and corresponding wattage ranges for energy-efficient alternatives.
Hours of Operation New England States, 2009 9 Econoler considers that metering data, when available, should always be prioritized over selfdeclaration estimates which may be influenced by respondent behavioural factors. Therefore, Econoler...
AI summary Econoler recommends using the Hydro-Québec study for estimating CFL usage in Nova Scotia due to its relevance and large sample size. The study found that 94% of CFLs are used indoors and 6% outdoors, leading to an overall average of 2.7 hours of daily use.
Unitary Savings According to the Evaluator's review of the displaced wattage values and the hours of operation, the unitary savings value was revised for both regular and specialty CFLs: $$Annual\ Unitary\ Savings_{Regular} = \frac{(51.8\...
AI summary The Evaluator revised the unitary savings values for regular and specialty compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) based on their actual wattage and hours of operation, resulting in annual savings of 51.0 kWh/yr for regular CFLs and 46.2 kWh/yr for specialty CFLs.
Final Unitary Savings Value The unitary savings value of 51.0 kWh and the replacement ratio of 0.8 are used in the gross savings evaluation for all regular CFLs sold through Instant Savings, which include the spring, fall and AIR MILES® ca...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings value and replacement ratio used in gross savings evaluations for regular and specialty CFLs sold through the Instant Savings program, with different values applied for each category.
Displaced Wattage The displaced wattage was revised according to the real wattage values of the two best seller models of LED recessed downlight fixtures found in the 2012 tracking sheet and the average equivalent halogen lamp wattage valu...
AI summary The displaced wattage was calculated based on the real wattage values of the two best-selling LED recessed downlight fixtures and the average equivalent halogen lamp wattage. The analysis found that the LED fixtures use 10.5 watts, while the halogen lamps they replaced used 65 watts, resulting in a displaced wattage of 54.5 watts.
Hours of Operation To the best of our knowledge, no organization has measured and released reliable and trustworthy statistics specifically on the hours of operation of LED recessed downlight fixtures installed in residential facilities. S...
AI summary The document discusses the estimation of hours of operation for LED recessed downlight fixtures, noting that no reliable statistics are available. Econoler used the same estimate as for CFLs, adjusting it to 2.68 hours per day due to the installation location of LED fixtures inside the house.
Table 18: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Dimmer Switches Parameters Values Wattage 2 × 60W = 120W Dimmed Wattage 80% × 120W = 96W Operating Time 2.7 h/day Annual Savings 23.7 kWh The OPA assumes that the light output from light fixt...
AI summary The OPA calculates annual energy savings from dimmer switches at 23.7 kWh per year, assuming a 20% energy saving from a 25% reduction in light output. Econoler accepts this assumption as there is no contradictory evidence.
Table 19: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Indoor Motion Sensors Parameters Values Fixture Wattage (2 × 60W) = 120W Old Operating Time 2.7 h/day New Operating Time – with Sensor 1.24 h/day Annual Savings 63.9 kWh The OPA estimates a r...
AI summary The OPA calculates unitary savings for indoor motion sensors based on a 54% reduction in operating time, from 2.7 to 1.24 hours per day, resulting in 63.9 kWh of annual savings. This calculation is based on fixture wattage and data from a metering study.
Table 20: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Dimmer Switches with Motion Sensor Parameters Values Fixture Wattage (2 × 60W) = 120W Dimmed Wattage 80% × 120W = 96W Old Operating Time 2.7 h/day New Operating Time – with Sensor 1.24 h/day...
AI summary Table 20 presents the OPA's unitary savings calculation for dimmer switches with motion sensors, showing an annual energy savings of 74.8 kWh. This value is used in the gross savings evaluation for all such devices sold through the program.
Table 21: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Outdoor Motion Sensors Parameters Values Average Lamp Wattage 242.6 W Old Operating Time 4.75 h/day New Operating Time – with Sensor 2.95 h/day Annual Savings 159 kWh
AI summary Table 21 presents the OPA's unitary savings calculation for outdoor motion sensors, including parameters such as average lamp wattage, old and new operating times, and annual savings of 159 kWh.
Table 22: Unitary Savings Calculation for Power Bars with Integrated Timer Parameters Entertainment Center Computer System Lighting Other Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Average wattage 38.1W 28W 60W 28W Old operating time 9 h/day 14 h/...
AI summary Table 22 presents a unitary savings calculation for power bars with integrated timers, based on assumptions provided by the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA). Econoler decided to retain a unitary savings value of 53.1 kWh per year, as data collection on usage was not feasible due to low sales volume.
Table 23: Unitary Savings Calculation for Load Sensing Power Bars Parameters Entertainment Center Home Office Average Annual Savings per Unit 79.0 kWh 38.4 kWh Average Usage 6,935 hours per year 5,252 hours per year Weighted Annual Savings...
AI summary Table 23 presents unitary savings calculations for load sensing power bars in different settings. Econoler evaluated the assumptions used in the calculation, which are based on a study by Ecos on smart plug strips, including manufacturer estimates and independent research.
Table 24: OPA's Unitary Savings Calculation for Heavy Duty Timers Parameters Values Average wattage 746W (1 HP pool pump power) Motor efficiency 70% Old operating time 10 h/day New operating time – with sensor 6 h/day Annual operating time...
AI summary Table 24 presents the OPA's unitary savings calculation for heavy duty timers used with pool pumps. The calculation assumes a reduction in operating time from 10 hours to 6 hours per day, resulting in an annual savings of 384 kWh. Econoler validated this value through a literature review, confirming that six hours per day is a reasonable reduced operating time for pool pumps.
Table 25: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec's Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Gross Energy Savings per Thermostat Single-Detached Duplex / Triplex / Townhouse Apartment Unitary savings for electronic thermostat accura...
AI summary Table 25 presents the energy savings from electronic thermostats in different housing types, calculated by Hydro-Québec. The data includes unitary savings for thermostat accuracy and temperature setback, with total unitary savings values for single-detached, duplex/triplex/townhouse, and apartment housing types. An average unitary savings value was calculated for programmable thermostats sold through Instant Savings, based on Nova Scotia's residential market proportions.
Table 26: ENSC's Unitary Savings Estimation for Programmable Thermostats Housing Type Calculation Parameters Single-Detached Duplex / Triplex / Townhouse Apartment Proportion of housing type16 76% 11% 13% Gross Energy Savings per thermosta...
AI summary Table 26 outlines ENSC's unitary savings estimation for programmable thermostats across different housing types, providing values for energy savings per thermostat. A unitary savings value of 223 kWh per year was established under the 2011 impact evaluation of the program.
Table 28: Unitary Savings Value for CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washers Parameters Values Base Annual Consumption – 319 Standard Clothes Washer kWh New Annual Consumption – 132 CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washer kWh Annual Unitary Savings 187 kWh 4.2.14 Hot...
AI summary Table 28 provides the unitary savings value for CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washers, showing a reduction in annual energy consumption from 319 kWh to 132 kWh, resulting in 187 kWh of annual unitary savings. The section also references Hot Water Tank Wraps as part of the discussion.
4.2.16 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of product installed through the program are presented in [Table 29.](#page-38-0) They were calculated using the revised unitary savings values presented in the previo...
AI summary The annual gross energy and demand savings from the program are detailed, with total savings at the meter being 13.853 GWh and 2.438 MW. At the generator level, after applying a line loss factor of 1.100, the savings increase to 15.238 GWh and 2.682 MW, split between Instant Savings and the AIR MILES® component.
Table 30: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings by Product – Other Products Category of Product Power Bar with Timer Smart Power Bar Heavy Duty Timer Program mable Thermostat CEE Tier 3 Refrigerator CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washer...
AI summary Table 30 presents evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings by product category, including data on the number of units sold, energy savings, and demand savings. The table includes various products such as power bars, thermostats, and refrigerators, along with their respective energy and demand savings metrics.
4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. For instance, replacement of inc...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, such as replacing incandescent bulbs with CFLs, which affect heating and cooling loads. It references a 1992 study by ADS for Hydro-Québec using DOE-2 software to evaluate these effects in homes heated entirely by electricity, selecting a minimum interactive effects scenario for calculations.
Table 32: Interactive Effects Factor for CFLs, LED Lamps and LED Recessed Downlights Category of Product % Indoor % Outdoor Interactive Effects Factor CFL 94% 6% (94% × -18.5%) + (6% × 0%) = -17.4% LED Lamp 94% 6% (94% × -18.5%) + (6% × 0%...
AI summary Table 32 presents the interactive effects factor for CFLs, LED lamps, and LED recessed downlights, based on their indoor and outdoor usage percentages. No interactive effects factor is calculated for other lighting devices such as motion sensors and timers sold through the program.
-ridership level of 59 percent. This value is lower than the 78 percent free-ridership level obtained under the 2011 evaluation. Through the intercept survey, participants were asked about their decision to purchase CFLs closer to the mome...
AI summary The free-ridership level for CFLs in 2012 was 59%, lower than 78% in 2011, due to improved in-store promotions and customer awareness. However, the level remains high, and Econoler suggests removing the rebate for regular CFLs.
4.5 NET SAVINGS Net energy savings are estimated by adding the interactive effects and the NTGR to the gross energy savings, using the equation below. Net Energy Savings = Gross Energy Savings × (1 + Interactive Effects Factor) × NTGR The...
AI summary This section outlines the calculation of net energy savings using a specific equation that incorporates gross energy savings, interactive effects, and the NTGR. The total net energy and demand savings are reported at both the meter and generator levels, with specific figures attributed to the Instant Savings and AIR MILES® components.
Table 34: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product – Lighting Products Category of Product Regular CFL Specialty CFL LED Lamp LED Recessed Downlight Fixture Dimmer Switch Dimmer Switch with Motion Sensor Indoor Motion...
AI summary Table 34 presents evaluation results for net energy and demand savings by product category, focusing on lighting products. The table includes energy savings, interactive effects factors, and demand savings for various lighting products such as CFLs, LED lamps, and motion sensors. The data highlights the performance of different lighting technologies in reducing energy and demand usage.
\ \ The NTGR of 0.91 for LED lamps corresponds to a weighted average calculated to take into account that a NTGR of 0.87 is applied on the LED lamps sold through the spring and fall campaigns (7,871 + 8,598 units) while a NTGR of 1 is used...
AI summary The document calculates the NTGR (Net Thermal Generation Ratio) of 0.91 for LED lamps by considering different sales channels, including spring and fall campaigns with a NTGR of 0.87 and AIR MILES® campaigns and in-store events with a NTGR of 1.00.
Table 35: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product – Other Products Category of Product Power Bar with Timer Smart Power Bar Heavy Duty Timer Program mable Thermostat CEE Tier 3 Refrigerator CEE Tier 3 Clothes Washer H...
AI summary Table 35 presents the evaluation results of net energy and demand savings by product category for other products. It includes energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, with specific values for products such as power bars, thermostats, and refrigerators.
CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of Instant Savings demonstrated that the program works well overall and constitutes the right approach in a market transformation and resource acquisition perspective. Additions were made to the program to he...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Instant Savings program found that it works well overall and was improved with increased discounts, more eligible products, and better marketing. ENSC implemented key recommendations from the 2011 evaluation, including new tools for program management. Retailers reported high satisfaction but noted challenges in involving store staff and expanding eligible product categories, especially for refrigerators. The program achieved energy savings of 10.767 GWh and demand savings of 1.895 MW in 2012.
Executive Summary 5. Improve the content of the tracking sheet : Econoler's review of the tracking sheet showed that ENSC took into consideration the recommendations from last year's evaluation and the Evaluator concludes that the 2012 tra...
AI summary Econoler's evaluation of the 2012 tracking sheet for the Instant Savings program found it to be complete and consistent. Two adjustments were suggested: including store identifiers for better organization of field activities and separating technical information into distinct columns for easier data analysis.
Please complete this form within the next 48 hours, save the file and send it back to us at [email protected]. Thank you! Part I: General Questions Please indicate your company name. Q1a. How would you describe your role(s) as an Effic...
AI summary This form requests information from Efficiency Nova Scotia energy efficiency program partners regarding their roles, duration of involvement, and the complexity of their participation process in the program.
CORPORATE RETAILER INTERVIEW GUIDE EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA INSTANT SAVINGS PROGRAM October 23, 2012 Hello, may I please speak with_______________? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY "Perhaps you can help me anyway." GO TO INTRODUCTION]...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for corporate retailers participating in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Instant Savings Program. It outlines the purpose of the interview, which is to evaluate the program's implementation and participation by retailers. The program includes rebates for energy-efficient products such as LED bulbs, thermostats, and refrigerators.
Scale: SECTION V - VERIFICATION OF PRODUCTS FROM DATABASE V1. From the database, check the products that received the program rebate for each period and validate the information with the interviewee. April-June campaign October-November ca...
AI summary The text outlines a verification process for products that received program rebates, focusing on ENERGY STAR CFLs and LED bulbs. It includes questions about sales volume, campaign performance, and the influence of the Instant Savings program on store operations.
SECTION L – ENERGY STAR LED BULBS L1. I now have a few questions about your sales of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs. By ENERGY STAR LED bulbs, we refer to ENERGY STAR LED screw-in bulbs and ENERGY STAR LED recessed downlights rebated through the pr...
AI summary The section asks about the sales volume of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs during the spring and fall 2012 campaigns and overall for 2012. It also inquires about expected sales trends and the percentage of sales attributed to the two campaigns.
L2. During the spring campaign, the Instant Savings program provided a rebate for each ENERGY STAR LED lamp and fixture sold in your stores. If this rebate had not been available, do you think that your spring sales of ENERGY STAR LED bulb...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Instant Savings program on the sales of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs during spring and fall campaigns, asking respondents to estimate the effect of the rebate on sales and the program's influence on various aspects of store operations.
Same [SKIP TO W3] Lower Higher [SKIP TO W3] Don't know [SKIP TO W3] Refused [SKIP TO W3] W2a. By what percentage do you estimate your stores' sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers would have been lower during the spring campaign if the reb...
AI summary The question asks for an estimate of the percentage decrease in sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers during a spring campaign if the rebate had not been available.
W3. Do you think that your fall sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers will be about the same, lower or higher than they would have been without the rebate offered? Same [SKIP TO W6] Lower Higher [SKIP TO W6] Don't know [SKIP TO W6] Refused...
AI summary The text includes a survey question regarding the impact of rebates on the sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers and another question assessing the influence of the Instant Savings program on various aspects of stores. Respondents are asked to estimate sales changes and rate the program's influence on a scale.
SECTION S - SATISFACTION WITH ENSC'S INSTANT SAVINGS PROGRAM I will now ask you questions on your satisfaction with different aspects of Efficiency Nova Scotia's Instant Savings on Energy Efficient Products. S1. On a scale from 1 to 10 (wh...
AI summary This section asks participants to rate their overall satisfaction with Efficiency Nova Scotia's Instant Savings on Energy Efficient Products on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is 'very bad' and 10 is 'excellent'.
SECTION BR - BARRIERS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BR1. In your opinion, what are the main barriers to the delivery of the program by order of importance? BR2. Efficiency Nova Scotia also offers Air Miles instead of rebates at stores that choose to...
AI summary The section asks for the main barriers to program delivery and inquires about customer preferences between instant rebates and loyalty rewards for energy-efficient purchases.
APPENDIX IV – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL 1 Visit Report Store Name: Address: Date of Visit: Eligible Products Energy Star Regular CFLs (multipacks of 2 or more) Energy Star Specialty CFLs (single or double packs) Energy Star Specialty CFLs (mu...
AI summary Appendix IV outlines an on-site visit protocol, including a table listing eligible products for inspection, such as Energy Star certified light bulbs, thermostats, and appliances. The document includes a placeholder for a store name, address, and visit date.
Canadian Tire Lighting Controls Thermostats Appliances Promotional Material Yes No No. Yes No No. Yes No No. Yes No No. Shelf Talkers Posters Stickers Street signs Vertical Hang tabs Comments: Atlantic Superstore Lighting Controls Thermost...
AI summary The text presents a table related to Canadian Tire's promotional materials and in-store displays for energy efficiency products, including lighting, controls, thermostats, and appliances. It includes information on the presence of promotional materials, shelf talkers, posters, stickers, and street signs at Atlantic Superstore.
Costco Lighting Controls Thermostats Appliances Promotional Material Yes No No. Yes No No. Yes No No. Yes No No. Shelf Talkers Posters Stickers Comments:
AI summary The document provides a table outlining the presence of promotional materials, such as shelf talkers, posters, and stickers, in various categories including lighting, controls, thermostats, and appliances at Costco. The table indicates that promotional materials are present in some categories but not others.
In the store visited, the products eligible for rebates are easily identified. The products are located at eye level on the shelf. Yes No Indicate the percentage of available products that are eligible versus ineligible (i.e., Energy Star...
AI summary The text discusses the visibility and identification of rebate-eligible products in a store, focusing on their placement, labeling, and the ability of shoppers and salespersons to identify them.
Do not ask the following questions directly to the representative. Simply show interest in the product/event. In-Store Event Section of the Store where the Event Takes Place Comments Location of the event (which section in the store). Is i...
AI summary This table outlines an in-store event related to energy efficiency programs, focusing on the location, information provided by representatives, and promotional materials used. It includes questions about product rebates, program details, and event visibility.
Knowledge of Products - 5. What does the ENERGY STAR logo mean? (Ask only if the ENERGY STAR logo is displayed.) - 6. Could you tell me how these products (products eligible for the instant rebate) differ from other products sold in your s...
AI summary The text discusses questions related to the ENERGY STAR logo and the differences between eligible products for instant rebates and other products sold in a store. It includes a reference to a picture, likely illustrating relevant products or information.
INTRODUCTION AND ELIGIBILITY Hello, my name is _____and I am with Corporate Research Associates, and we are performing the evaluation of the Instant Savings program provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. We are gathering informati...
AI summary This section outlines the introduction and eligibility criteria for a customer survey conducted by Corporate Research Associates to evaluate the Instant Savings program provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The survey focuses on customers who purchased energy-efficient light bulbs (CFLs and LEDs) and includes questions about purchase details and willingness to participate.
Awareness of Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia (AW Series) - AW1. Have you ever heard of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Instant Savings program? [CODE ONE ONLY] - 1. Yes [GO TO AW2] - 2. No [GO TO AW3] - 98. (Don't Know) [GO TO AW3] - 99. (Re...
AI summary This section of the proceeding document asks respondents about their awareness of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Instant Savings program and their familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes a series of questions designed to gauge public knowledge and exposure to the program through various channels.
CFL SEQUENCE - FR0a. [POSE FR0a ONLY IF I2 = 1] You bought CFLs today. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a discount on packages of CFLs. Before paying at the cash register, were you aware that a discount was offered on the purchase of CFLs? [...
AI summary This section of the proceeding collects customer feedback on awareness and influence of a discount offered on the purchase of CFLs by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explores how customers learned about the discount, whether they saw in-store promotions, and how the discount influenced their purchasing decisions.
- FR4. If the discount had NOT been offered, when would you have purchased the CFLs that you purchased today? Would it have been…[CODE ONE ONLY] - 1. Definitely today - 2. Probably today - 3. Probably at a later date - 4. Definitely at a l...
AI summary The text contains survey questions about the influence of a discount on the purchase of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) by customers. It asks respondents when they would have purchased the CFLs without the discount, how the quantity purchased would have changed, and how influential the discount was on their decision.
FR0aa. [POSE FR0aa ONLY IF I2 = 2 OR 3] You bought LEDs today. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a discount on packages of LEDs. Before paying at the cash register , were you aware that a discount was offered on the purchase of LEDs? [CODE ON...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document contains a series of questions aimed at determining whether respondents were aware of a discount on LED packages offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia before making a purchase. The questions are structured to identify awareness and follow-up based on responses.
FR0cc. How did you learn about the discount offered on the purchase of specific packages of LEDs? [DO NOT READ RESPONSES – CODE AS MANY AS APPLY] 1. (Radio ads) 2. (Newspaper ads) 3. (In-store signage) 4. (Efficiency Nova Scotia website) 5...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions related to customer awareness and response to discounts on LED purchases, including how customers learned about the discount, whether they saw promotional materials in stores, and how the discount influenced their purchasing decisions.
- FR41. If the discount had NOT been offered, when would you have purchased the LEDs that you purchased today? Would it have been…[CODE ONE ONLY] - 1. Definitely today - 2. Probably today - 3. Probably at a later date - 4. Definitely at a...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about customer behavior regarding LED purchases, specifically focusing on how a discount might influence the timing and quantity of purchases. Respondents are asked to consider scenarios where the discount was not available and how their purchasing decisions would have changed.
[ASK IF AWARE OF THE DISCOUNT (FR0aa=1) OR (FR0bb=1)]] FR71. How influential was the discount offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia on your decision to purchase the LEDs that you purchased today? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10,...
AI summary The text asks respondents about the influence of a discount offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia on their decision to purchase LEDs, using a scale from 0 to 10. The table shows a response category for 'Don't Know' and 'Refused'. The section also mentions 'Products Rebated (PR Series)', which may relate to rebate programs.
IF FR0 = 100% OR EMPTY: FR0 and FINISH OTHERWISE CONTINUE FR1. Did knowing that a discount was offered on the purchase of [CFLs or LEDs] play a part in your decision to buy [CFLs or LEDs] today? IF 1. Yes: FR1 = 0% IF 2 OR 9 · FR1 = 100% F...
AI summary The text outlines a conditional survey question regarding the influence of discounts on the purchase of [CFLs or LEDs]. It asks respondents whether the discount influenced their decision and how likely they would have been to purchase the products without the discount.
IE FR1 - 0%: FR3/2 IF FR1 = 100% : FR3 FR4. If the discount had not been offered, when would you have - purchased the [CFLs or LEDs] that you purchased today? - Definitely today - Probably today - Probably at a later date - Definitely at a...
AI summary This section of the document presents a conditional question regarding the purchase of energy-efficient lighting products (CFLs or LEDs) under different discount scenarios. It explores customer behavior in response to the absence of a discount, with multiple response options provided.
FR4 FR5. [ASK IF AWARE OF THE DISCOUNT (FR0a=1 OR FR0b=1)] Without the discount, would you have purchased the same number of [CFLs or LEDs]? - Definitely the same number - 2 Probably the same number - Probably less - Definitely less (Don't...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document asks respondents whether they would have purchased the same number of CFLs or LEDs without a discount, with response options ranging from 'definitely the same number' to 'definitely less.' The responses are used to calculate the discount's impact, with corresponding percentages assigned based on the answer selected.
FR5 FR7. How influential was the discount offered by ENSC on your decision to purchase the [CFLs or LEDs] that you purchased today? (Scale 0 to 10) $FR7 = (10 - Answer) \times 10\%$
AI summary This question asks about the influence of a discount offered by ENSC on the purchase of energy-efficient lighting products. The response is calculated as a percentage based on a scale from 0 to 10.
ACRONYMS CATI Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing CEATI Center for Energy Advancement through Technology Innovation CRA Corporate Research Associates DA Delivery Agent DHW Domestic Hot Water DWHR Drain Water Heat Recovery DSM Demand S...
AI summary The document provides a list of acronyms relevant to energy efficiency and related programs, including terms such as DSM (Demand Side Management), ENSC (Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation), and EE (Energy Efficiency), along with their full forms.
DEFINITIONS Base case A base case details the information on how assumed gross savings used in the tracking sheet have been established. Usually, these savings are calculated with a series of variables such as hours of operation, wattage o...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and demand management, including concepts like base case, demand savings, distortion effects, and evaluated savings. It outlines how these terms are used in the context of program evaluation and energy performance measurement.
Line loss factor Percentage of the electrical energy losses occurring in the transmission and distribution system between the utility generator and the customer meter. Net energy savings Energy savings generated by energy efficiency measur...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and measurement, including line loss factor, net energy savings, net-to-gross ratio, sampling error, sample size, spillover, and tracked savings, as calculated and used by EnerGuide for Existing Houses (ENSC).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2012 process and impact evaluation of Home Energy Assessment (HEA), which is a component of the Existing Houses program. The 2012 evaluation was based on in-depth interviews with th...
AI summary The 2012 process and impact evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, part of the Existing Houses program, involved interviews with key personnel, on-site visits, participant simulations, and a telephone survey to assess the program's effectiveness.
Implementation of Measures This year, survey results showed that draft proofing and window/door/skylight replacement were the two most recommended measures. Among all the recommended measures, draft proofing, electric water heater exposed...
AI summary Survey results indicate that draft proofing and window/door/skylight replacement were the most recommended measures, with draft proofing, electric water heater insulation, and tank insulation being the most implemented. Cost was the primary barrier to implementing recommended measures, as noted in previous surveys.
Satisfaction Satisfaction with the program is high among participants. Indeed, nearly all participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with the program overall and with the impact of the measures implemented. Very high levels of sat...
AI summary Participants in the program express high satisfaction with the program and its impact, particularly with energy assessments and the courtesy of Energy Advisors. However, program partners are divided in their satisfaction, with some expressing dissatisfaction due to frequent program changes and lack of government support. Partners also note a lack of collaboration from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and issues with the HOT2000 software.
Program Energy Savings Econoler estimated the gross savings of HEA in 2012 through a comparative analysis of information available in the tracking sheet, a billing calibration with 172 participants and the review and proper adjustment of p...
AI summary Econoler estimated the gross energy savings of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program in 2012 through a comparative analysis of tracking sheets, billing calibration with 172 participants, and adjustments to prescriptive measure savings from the old EEH program. Free-ridership was found to be 30%, similar to the 2011 evaluation, while no internal spillover was detected.
The evaluation revealed that HEA generated net energy savings of 7.184 GWh and demand savings of 2.370 MW in 2012, as shown in the next table.
AI summary The evaluation found that the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012, with net energy savings of 7.184 GWh and demand savings of 2.370 MW.
1 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Home Energy Assessment (HEA) encourages homeowners in Nova Scotia to improve the energy efficiency (EE) and comfort of their home while reducing its environmental impact a...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program helps homeowners improve energy efficiency and reduce costs. The program replaced the EnerGuide for Existing Houses (EEH) in 2012 due to changes in eligible measures and the withdrawal of federal rebates. The federal EnerGuide program reached its participant limit and closed new enrollments in 2012, but existing participants can still use HEA for further upgrades.
2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information Analyzing program documentation was the first task in the process evaluation for HEA. At this stage, all of the available program information was reviewed. The information used to conduct this a...
AI summary The first task in the process evaluation for HEA involved analyzing program documentation. Information was primarily obtained from the ENSC website, the Program Manual, and the Tracking Sheet.
2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November 2012, two on-site visits were conducted at houses in which measures from HEA had been implemented. This part of the process evaluation was carried out by Econoler's subcontractor ecoPlus Services, which app...
AI summary In November 2012, two on-site visits were conducted at homes where HEA measures were implemented to ensure EAs followed EnerGuide guidelines and collected necessary data for HOT2000 simulations. The visits were carried out by ecoPlus Services, a subcontractor of Econoler.
3.2.1 Program Manual A program manual is an important tool for the entire program staff as well as for the Evaluator. Indeed, it serves as a program memory and can be particularly useful in case of staff changes. The program manual is inte...
AI summary The program manual serves as a critical tool for program staff and evaluators, providing a standardized template for ENSC programs. It includes detailed sections and has improved from the 2011 version based on evaluator recommendations. Some details, such as incentive calculations, will be addressed as the new program manager becomes more familiar with the program.
Table 4: Program Manual Content - HEA Program Manual Content 2011 2012 Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives Eligibility criteria Program partners a...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the content of the Program Manual for the Heat Energy Assistance (HEA) program, detailing sections such as program description, eligibility criteria, incentives, and evaluation plans. The table shows that most content was not included in the manual for the years 2011 and 2012, with only 'Program forms' noted as 'N/A'.
3.4 ON-SITE VISITS The on-site visits conducted as part of the HEA evaluation were used to assess the procedure and ecoENERGY protocol that EAs must follow during assessments. The ecoENERGY protocol was established by NRCan to provide a fr...
AI summary On-site visits were conducted to evaluate the HEA program, focusing on the ecoENERGY protocol followed by EAs. The visits confirmed that EAs adhered well to the protocol, effectively communicated with homeowners, and accurately collected data for EnerGuide ratings using HOT2000 simulations.
3.5 HOT2000 SIMULATION REVIEW The first point noticed during the HOT2000 simulation review was the high variability in professionalism and training found between EAs. Some of these organizations presented very accurate files which displaye...
AI summary The HOT2000 simulation review identified significant variability in the quality of work performed by EAs, with some producing accurate reports while others had recurrent errors. Econoler recommends ENSC implement a continuous review process to improve data collection and simulation accuracy, including feedback and training for EAs.
3.6.2 Relationship with Program Partners All of the program partners had a very high level of satisfaction regarding their relationship with ENSC staff. On the other hand, a great majority of the DAs reported the near absence of collaborat...
AI summary Program partners expressed high satisfaction with ENSC staff, but DAs and EAs reported poor collaboration and lack of commitment from NRCan. EAs also highlighted issues with the HOT2000 software managed by NRCan, including deficiencies and a need for more human resources.
3.6.3 Assessment Process Regarding the assessment process in general, both EAs reported that the EnerGuide methodology is appropriate in the context of the program. The 2011 evaluation report mentioned recommendations related to explaining...
AI summary The assessment process for energy efficiency programs involves using the EnerGuide methodology, with Energy Advisors ensuring proper explanation of protocols, taking photographs, and following blower door testing procedures. Clients are provided with educational materials like the 'Keeping the Heat In' booklet.
3.6.4 Opinion on Marketing Strategy Concerning the marketing and outreach activities, the majority of the program partners stated that even though it took a long time before the marketing strategy was put in place, they were happy with the...
AI summary Program partners expressed satisfaction with the marketing strategy, suggesting continued aggressive outreach through media and merchant promotions. They recommended focusing on renovators and contractors, increasing incentives, and offering more education through workshops to boost participation and support the growth of the energy efficiency industry.
3.7 PARTICIPANT PERSPECTIVES The survey was conducted with participants that completed their upgrades during 2012. Therefore, the following 2012 results include participants from both the old delivery model under EEH (n=72) and the new del...
AI summary The survey included participants who completed energy efficiency upgrades in 2012, comprising individuals from both the old EEH model (n=72) and the new HEA model (n=8).
Table 5: Program Awareness Sources of Program Awareness 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Word of mouth 40% 40% Newspaper ad or story 23% 15% The Internet 10% 15% Television 10% 11% Radio 10% 6% From a contractor 7% 6% Building supply dealer/sto...
AI summary Table 5 presents data on program awareness in 2011 and 2012, showing that word of mouth was the primary source of awareness, followed by newspaper ads, the internet, and television. Other sources like Facebook, TeamBuy, and specific distributors had lower awareness rates.
3.7.2 Motivations and Barriers to Participation Saving money was the primary motivation for participation in the program, with three in ten participants wanting to save on energy costs (29%) and one quarter motivated by the rebates availab...
AI summary Saving money was the primary motivation for participation in the energy efficiency program, with 29% of participants aiming to reduce energy costs and 24% motivated by available rebates. A smaller percentage were already considering energy efficiency measures or wanted to assess their home's efficiency.
Table 6: Reasons for Participating 2011 2012 Reasons for Participating Primary Reason Secondary Reasons Primary Reason Secondary Reasons Sample Size 70 70 80 80 To save on energy costs/bills 33% 17% 29% 13% Rebates 14% 9% 24% 11% Already t...
AI summary Table 6 presents the reasons participants in energy efficiency programs cited for joining between 2011 and 2012. The primary reasons included saving on energy costs, rebates, and evaluations of home efficiency. The data shows a decline in the percentage of participants who 'don't know' their reasons over the two years.
Table 7: Concerns with Program Prior to Taking Part Participant Concerns 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Yes 6% 8% No 94% 93% The concerns held by participants were varied. Participants were concerned that the improvements would cost a lot, th...
AI summary Participants expressed concerns about the cost of improvements, dissatisfaction with recommended measures, low rebate amounts, and perceived inefficiency of their homes prior to taking part in the program.
Respondents were asked to rate the importance of the program elements that might have influenced their decision to implement energy-efficient measures through the program. Program incentives (mean of 8.6 on a 10 point scale), information a...
AI summary Respondents rated the importance of various program elements influencing their decision to implement energy-efficient measures. Program incentives, information from energy advisors, and the EnerGuide label were highly valued, while previous experience with the program was considered less important.
Table 9: Importance of Program in Influencing Decisions Importance of Program in Influencing Decisions 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Average rating: 10="Extremely important," 0="Not important at all" Program incentives 8.4 8.6 Information or...
AI summary Table 9 presents data on the importance of various programs in influencing decisions, with high ratings for program incentives and information from energy advisors. The data shows slight improvements from 2011 to 2012. Section 3.7.4 discusses recommendations and implementation through the program.
Table 10: Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures Implemented Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures Implemented 2011 2012 Sample Size 64 79 Implemented some of the measures recommended 42% 65% Implemented all measures recommended 50% 32% D...
AI summary Table 10 shows the implementation rates of recommended energy efficiency measures in 2011 and 2012. In 2011, 42% of respondents implemented some measures, while 50% implemented all. In 2012, these rates changed to 65% and 32%, respectively. The data highlights varying levels of compliance with recommendations over time.
2012 Evaluation Report Participants were given a number of measures and asked whether a measure was recommended and, if so, whether they implemented that measure. This year, the most recommended measure was draft proofing (76%), followed b...
AI summary The 2012 Evaluation Report highlights that draft proofing was the most recommended and implemented energy efficiency measure, while several other measures had very low implementation rates, including electric thermal storage systems and solar domestic water heating systems.
Table 11: Recommended and Implemented Measures 2011 2012 Measures Recom mended Imple mented Recom mended Imple mented Sample Size 70 70 80 80 Draft proofing n/a n/a 76% 45% Windows/Doors/Skylights n/a n/a 70% 30% Electric water heater tank...
AI summary Table 11 presents the recommended and implemented measures for energy efficiency programs from 2011 to 2012, including insulation, heat pumps, and water heating systems, with varying levels of implementation across different measures.
4 This result may include homeowners who had this measure implemented under RDI. 5 This result may include homeowners who had this measure implemented under RDI. 6 This result may include homeowners who had this measure implemented under R...
AI summary The table shows the uptake rates of various energy efficiency measures, with electric water heater exposed pipe insulation, draft proofing, and electric water heater tank insulation having the highest uptake at 60%, 59%, and 57% respectively among program participants.
Table 12: Uptake of Measures 2011 2012 Proposed Energy Efficiency Measures Measure Uptake Measure Uptake Sample Size 70 80 Electric water heater exposed pipe insulation 91% 60% Draft proofing n/a 59% Electric water heater tank insulation 8...
AI summary Table 12 outlines the uptake of proposed energy efficiency measures in 2011 and 2012, showing varying levels of implementation across different measures, with some measures having significantly higher uptake in 2011 compared to 2012.
Table 13: Implementation of Recommended Upgrades Implementation of Recommended Upgrades 2012 Sample Size 76 I hired a contractor to complete the upgrades 45% Some upgrades were implemented by me and others by a contractor/Mix of both 33% I...
AI summary Table 13 outlines how respondents implemented recommended energy efficiency upgrades in 2012. The majority (45%) hired a contractor, 33% used a mix of self-implementation and contractors, and 22% completed the work themselves.
Those participants who did not implement all of the measures recommended were asked the reason for this decision. Cost was the primary reason, with four in ten participants saying that it was too expensive to implement all the measures (43...
AI summary The majority of participants who did not implement all recommended energy efficiency measures cited cost as the primary reason, with 43% finding it too expensive and 12% lacking financial means. Additionally, 24% did not believe they needed all the recommended measures.
Table 14: Reasons all Recommended Measures were not Implemented Reasons Measures were 2011 2012 not Implemented Primary Reason Secondary Reasons Primary Reason Secondary Reasons Sample Size 31 30 51 50 Too expensive 61% 7% 43% 12% Didn't t...
AI summary Table 14 outlines the reasons why recommended energy efficiency measures were not implemented by respondents in 2011 and 2012. The primary reason cited was that the measures were too expensive, with secondary reasons including lack of financial means, perceived lack of need, and long payback periods.
3.7.5 Impact of Measures Participants were asked a series of questions regarding comfort, in order to assess the impact the program measures have had. Eight in ten participants noticed a change in the comfort level of their home (81%). Of...
AI summary Participants in the program reported that 81% noticed a change in home comfort, with 46% noting increased warmth and 37% observing reduced energy costs. Other improvements included more even temperatures, fewer drafts, and easier heating.
Table 15: Specific Impacts of Measures on Comfort Noticed Change in Comfort Level 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Yes 90% 81% No 9% 13% Don't know 1% 6% Changes Noticed 2011 2012 Sample Size 63 65 House is warmer 32% 46% Reduced cost of energy...
AI summary Table 15 presents data on the impact of energy efficiency measures on comfort levels in 2011 and 2012. It shows a decrease in the percentage of respondents who noticed a change in comfort level, along with shifts in specific comfort-related factors such as warmth, drafts, and temperature control.
3.7.6 Satisfaction with the Program The program achieved a very high level of satisfaction. Indeed, nearly all participants were very satisfied (60%) or satisfied (35%) with the program overall. Participants who were not satisfied indicate...
AI summary The program achieved a very high level of satisfaction, with 60% of participants very satisfied and 35% satisfied. Dissatisfaction was primarily due to short time periods for completing upgrades, issues with pre- or post-retrofit reports, and difficulties in scheduling appointments with energy advisors.
Table 17: Satisfaction with Specific Aspects of the Program Satisfaction with Specific Aspects of the Program 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Courtesy of EA 99% 100% First energy assessment overall 99% 96% Scheduling and timing of the first as...
AI summary Table 17 presents customer satisfaction levels with specific aspects of an energy efficiency program in 2011 and 2012. Satisfaction rates for aspects like courtesy of energy advisors and scheduling of assessments were high, while satisfaction with rebates and time for upgrades was lower. Overall, nearly all participants were satisfied with implemented measures.
Table 18: Satisfaction with Energy Efficiency Measures Satisfaction with Energy Efficiency Measures 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Very satisfied/satisfied 96% 94%
AI summary Table 18 presents data on customer satisfaction with energy efficiency measures in 2011 and 2012, showing high satisfaction rates of 96% and 94% respectively, with sample sizes of 70 and 80.
Table 19: Recommendations for Improvements Suggestions 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 80 Offer more information on the products/measures recommended 14% 11% Increase rebates/give bigger rebates 7% 11% Increase the period given to complete the im...
AI summary Table 19 presents recommendations for improving energy efficiency programs, with a focus on increasing rebate sizes, expanding eligible products, enhancing communication, and advertising. The data shows a trend of increasing suggestions from 2011 to 2012, with the most notable increase in advertising the program and offering more information on products.
Table 20: Specific Information Would Like to See with Rebate/Incentive Cheque Specific Information 2012 Sample Size 24 More detail on what measures would get a rebate/Break down of the rebate calculation 50% More energy saving tips 17% Oth...
AI summary Table 20 outlines customer preferences regarding the information they would like to see with rebate or incentive cheques. The majority (50%) want more detail on rebate measures and calculations, while 17% prefer energy saving tips or information on other programs. A significant portion (17%) indicated they don't know.
Electric Hot Water Heater Pipe Insulation The EEH program proposed the installation of water heater pipe insulation where the domestic hot water is electrically heated. For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 74 kWh. This va...
AI summary The EEH program proposed installing water heater pipe insulation for electrically heated domestic hot water, with ENSC using a unitary savings value of 74 kWh. This value was based on a 10-foot, 0.75-inch diameter insulated pipe, but Econoler noted it corresponds to approximately 6 feet of insulation as calculated in the 2011 OPA report.
Table 22: Unitary Savings Values by Length of Insulated Pipe Length of Insulated Pipe Unitary Savings Value 3 feet 38 kWh/year 6 feet 76 kWh/year 9 feet 114 kWh/year 12 feet 152 kWh/year 15 feet 190 kWh/year While three feet seems to be a...
AI summary Table 22 shows unitary savings values for different lengths of insulated pipe, ranging from 3 feet to 15 feet. The text discusses that residential applications typically use between 6 and 15 feet of insulation, with the assumption that insulation is installed downstream of the hot water storage tank to maximize energy savings.
Table 23: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec's Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Calculation Parameters Single Detached Duplex/Triplex/ Townhouse Apartment Gross Energy Savings for Electronic Thermostat Accuracy Savings...
AI summary Table 23 presents energy savings from electronic thermostats in different housing types. Savings per thermostat are provided for single detached, duplex/triplex/townhouse, and apartment units. The data is based on research from Hydro-Québec's laboratory of energy technologies, comparing electronic and bimetallic thermostats.
4.4.2 Internal Spillover The participant survey was also used to assess internal spillover. In the case of HEA, internal spillover can occur when participants, following their previous participation, implement additional energy efficiency...
AI summary The evaluation of internal spillover from the HEA program found negligible impact in 2012, with only three participants out of 80 reporting additional energy efficiency measures. Savings from these measures were minimal, leading Econoler to exclude internal spillover from calculations.
The Evaluator compared the net energy savings values calculated in the previous table with HEA tracked net savings for 2012. The next table details the final evaluated and tracked impacts for 2012.
AI summary The Evaluator compared net energy savings values from a previous table with HEA tracked net savings for 2012, and the next table provides the final evaluated and tracked impacts for that year.
Table 27: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Gross Savings Initial Gross with Interactive Savings Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 9.177 GWh 9.177 GWh 0.70 6.424 GWh Evaluation Res...
AI summary Table 27 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC programs in 2012. Evaluated savings are 12% and 11% higher than tracked savings for energy and demand, respectively. The discrepancy is due to a recalibration of energy savings per EnerGuide point based on a larger sample size and more precise billing analysis.
This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations 2. Consider the possibility of providing technical support for HO...
AI summary The appendix recommends that ENSC consider providing technical support for HOT2000, as EAs reported a lack of collaboration and support from NRCan after training, and noted deficiencies in the software management by NRCan.
ectrically and non-electrically heated houses. Secondly, based on these savings, the net savings can be determined using the net-to-gross ratio and the line loss factor for electrically heated houses. On-Site Visits 13. Explain the values...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of explaining EnerGuide reports to homeowners during on-site visits, emphasizing the need for Energy Advisors (EAs) to provide examples of these reports to ensure homeowners understand their value, including details like EnerGuide ratings, air leakage rates, and recommended upgrades.
APPENDIX II – INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH DELIVERY AGENTS Program name: Home Energy Assessment How to complete this form This is a Word document that integrates some form features. To enter your answers, simply position your cursor on the shaded...
AI summary This document provides an interview guide for delivery agents involved in the Home Energy Assessment program. It outlines how to complete the form, which is a Word document with integrated form features, and requests completion within 48 hours and submission to a specific email address.
ENERGY ADVISOR INTERVIEW GUIDE EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA HEA PROGRAM September 28, 2012 INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _______, from Econoler. I am calling on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the Home Energy Assessment program...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for the Efficiency Nova Scotia Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program from 2012. It outlines the purpose of the interview, confidentiality, and questions about the respondent's involvement and participation process in the program.
IN3. On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is very poor and 10 is excellent), how would you rate your satisfaction in regard to the…? Aspects of the program Score 1=very poor 10=excellent Reason If you answered 8 or less, please share the reaso...
AI summary The text presents a survey asking participants to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of a program, including marketing, relationships with ENSC staff, and the assessment process. It includes questions about the EnerGuide methodology, the assessment protocol, and participant understanding of energy efficiency measures.
The next questions will concern the measures promoted by the Home Energy Assessment program. PM1a. The program now promotes only insulation measures to reduce heat loss in homes. Do you feel this program modification… Was easily adapted in...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions related to the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, focusing on its current promotion of insulation measures and potential improvements. It also mentions a section for recommendations to help ENSC enhance the program.
APPENDIX IV – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL The others on-site visit protocols for Home Energy Assessment are attached in PDF format to this report.
AI summary This appendix references on-site visit protocols for Home Energy Assessments, which are attached as PDFs to the report.
RELEVANCE AND ACCURACY OF OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMANDATIONS MADE BY ADVISOR The advisor made an effort to collect as much information as possible about the house components / 5 The advisor understood the different sections of the house and...
AI summary The document evaluates the accuracy and thoroughness of an advisor's home energy assessment, highlighting precise measurements, understanding of building systems, and proper use of equipment. The advisor was successful in identifying issues and making effective recommendations for energy efficiency improvements.
ABILITY OF THE ADVISOR TO CONVEY HIS OBSERVATIONS TO THE CLIENT The advisor explained his views in simple language which the client can easily understand / 5 The advisor made an effort to convince the client to undertake the recommended re...
AI summary The document evaluates the advisor's ability to communicate effectively with the client during an energy assessment. It highlights the advisor's use of simple language, thorough explanations of processes and reports, attention to client concerns, and adherence to safety and property respect.
QUALITY AND PRECISION OF THE COMPUTER SIMULATION AND ENERGUIDE RATING The data that was input in the HOT2000 simulation is consistent with the actual real measurements of the house The ENERGUIDE RATING given to the house is accurate / 5 Th...
AI summary The document assesses the accuracy of the ENERGUIDE RATING and simulation data for a home. It confirms that the data input into the HOT2000 simulation aligns with actual measurements, the ENERGUIDE report is accurate, and the advisor followed proper procedures, including correct modeling of windows, doors, and insulation levels.
RELEVANCE AND ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTED BY THE ADVISOR The advisor made a complete list of all of the relevant retrofits that were performed /5 The advisor collected all of the relevant invoices and pictures to clearly identify...
AI summary The document evaluates the advisor's performance in collecting and verifying information about home energy retrofits, including the accuracy of measurements, proper installation of testing equipment, and identification of moisture and air quality issues. The advisor was thorough in documenting changes and ensuring data accuracy.
QUALITY AND PRECISION OF THE COMPUTER SIMULATION AND ENERGUIDE RATING The data that was input in the HOT2000 simulation is consistent with the actual measurements of the house /5 The ENERGUIDE RATING given to the house is accurate /5 The E...
AI summary The document evaluates the accuracy and quality of a Home Energy Assessment (HEA) conducted using the HOT2000 simulation and ENERGUIDE rating. It confirms that the data input was consistent with actual measurements, the ENERGUIDE rating was accurate, and the advisor followed proper procedures, including safety precautions and data submission requirements.
INSTRUCTION QUESTION WORDING SHOULD BE ADAPTED ACCORDING TO TRACKING SHEET COLUMN "PROGRAM" - EGH=ENERGUIDE FOR EXISTING HOUSES PROGRAM - HEA=HOME ENERGY ASSESSEMENT SERVICE Hello may I please speak with [INSERT NAME]? - 1 Yes [GO TO INTRO...
AI summary The text outlines an instruction for handling customer inquiries, specifically regarding energy programs, and includes a script for engaging with a named individual. It references specific programs such as ENERGUIDE FOR EXISTING HOUSES and HOME ENERGY ASSESSEMENT SERVICE.
Verification and Recall (V Series) - V1. We understand you participated in the [Home Energy Assessment service/EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program]. Is that correct? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [PROMPT: "Are you sure? Someone would have...
AI summary This section of the document asks respondents if they participated in the Home Energy Assessment service or EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, providing prompts to help them recall if they did. It includes instructions for how to proceed based on their response.
- P1. How did you learn about the [Home Energy Assessment service/EnerGuide for Existing Houses program]? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE RESPONSES] - 1. (Efficiency Nova Scotia Website) - 2. (Internet Ad) - 3. (Radio Ad) - 4. (Newspaper Ad...
AI summary The text includes a survey question about how individuals learned about the Home Energy Assessment service and the EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, along with various response options, including program delivery agents and other channels. It also references a 2012 Evaluation Report, though the content of the report is not included in the provided text.
14. (Facebook) 15. (Home shows) 16. (Building supply dealer/store) 17. (Television) 18. (Previous/past participant) 96. (Other) [SPECIFY] 98. (Don't know) - P2. Now I'm going to ask you to think back to when you decided to schedule an ener...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to identify the single most important reason they decided to schedule an energy efficiency evaluation through the Home Energy Assessment service or EnerGuide for Existing Houses program.
Satisfaction with [Service/Program] (S Series) - S1. Thinking of your OVERALL experience with the [Home Energy Assessment service/EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program] up to this point, including any services received or energy efficient...
AI summary The text outlines a survey designed to assess customer satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment service or the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. It includes questions about overall satisfaction, reasons for dissatisfaction, and specific aspects of the service or program.
Very satisfied Satisfied satisfied nor dissatisfied Neither Dissatisfied dissatisfied Very DK/Ref a. The First Energy Audit Overall (This was the first audit of your home's energy use that identified ways to make it more energy efficient)...
AI summary The text presents a survey with questions related to customer satisfaction regarding energy audits, upgrades, and service provider interactions. It includes categories such as the first and final energy audits, scheduling, information provided, and the overall experience with the program.
Spillover (SO Series) SKIP PATTERN APPLIES TO ENTIRE SO SECTION: ASK IF VR2a=3 ("No, have not implemented any upgrades" OR IF VR2b=2 ("No, not implemented the upgrade") OR IF ANY POSED ITEM IN VR3a thru s=2 "No, not implemented" You mentio...
AI summary The text discusses a skip pattern for a section related to spillover effects, specifically asking if recommended upgrades from a home energy assessment or program have been implemented since participation. It includes response options for the participant.
[IF SO1=1] SO2. Which upgrades have you implemented on your own after participating in the [Home Energy Assessment service/EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program]? [READ, ACCEPT MULTIPLE] [IF VR2a=1 (Yes, implemented at least one upgrade):...
AI summary The text asks participants in the Home Energy Assessment service or EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program about upgrades they implemented after receiving recommendations and whether they received financing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. It also asks about the influence of the program on their decision to implement upgrades.
Reasons for Non-Participation [NP Series] [ASK IF VR2a=1 OR 3 OR IF VR2b=2] - NP1. You mentioned in a previous answer that there were some recommended upgrades that you decided not to install. What is the SINGLE most important reason you d...
AI summary The text outlines reasons for non-participation in a home energy program, focusing on the single most important reason participants decided not to install recommended upgrades. It includes options such as cost, financial means, and payback period, and allows for additional reasons to be specified.
FR2a. the [service/program]? implemented exactly the same energy efficiency upgrades that you implemented through Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2b. implemented standard equipment instead of energy-efficient equipment? Response 98 Don...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions related to the implementation of energy efficiency upgrades through a service or program, with response options indicating 'Don't Know' or 'Refused.' It also includes a conditional statement for follow-up questions if a specific threshold is met.
FR2cc. [DO NOT ASK FR2cc IF DON'T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c] You indicated in your response to a previous question that if the [Home Energy Assessment service/EnerGuide for Existing Houses program] had not been available there was an X in...
AI summary The text asks respondents to estimate how many months later they would have implemented energy-efficient upgrades without the Home Energy Assessment service or EnerGuide for Existing Houses program, assuming they would have done so eventually.
- 3. (At the same time) - 98. (Don't Know) - 99. (Refused) [IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2cc ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ]: Would it have been within… - 1. Less than 6 months? - 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later? - 3. 1 to le...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the timing of an event and the impact of a rebate provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia on a respondent's decision to pay for energy efficiency upgrades. The questions are structured for survey or interview responses.
FR4. Next, I'm going to ask you to rate the importance of the [service/program] as well as other factors that might have influenced your decision to implement the energy efficiency upgrades you implemented through the [service/program]? Us...
AI summary The text requests participants to rate the importance of a service or program and other factors influencing their decision to implement energy efficiency upgrades using a 0 to 10 scale, with 0 being 'Not at all important' and 10 being 'Extremely important'.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The [service/program] incentive Response 98 Don't Know99 Refused b. Information or advice provided by the [service/program] Response 98 Don't Know99 Refused c. Information or advice from the energy...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to a service or program and responses indicating a lack of knowledge or refusal to answer. It also references the impact of measures on comfort level, though no details are provided.
Recommendations for Program Improvements [R Series] - R1. Do you have any recommendations for improving the [Home Energy Assessment service/EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program]? Probe: Anything else? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] - 1. (...
AI summary The document presents a list of recommendations for improving the Home Energy Assessment service and the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program. Respondents are asked to provide feedback on various aspects such as increasing rebate amounts, improving communication, and advertising the program more effectively.
98. (Don't know) 99. (Refused) R2. 1. 2. 98. 99. Are there any energy efficiency upgrades that were not covered by the [service/program] that you would like to have had covered through the [service/program]? (Yes) (No) (Don't know) (Refuse...
AI summary The text presents a survey with questions related to energy efficiency upgrades and customer experiences with rebate or incentive programs. It includes response options such as 'Don't know' and 'Refused' and outlines demographic questions for statistical purposes.
MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a; FR2b) FR1. Before participating in the program, did you have plans to implement the specific energy efficiency upgrades that were implemented through the program? IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a IF 2 OR 9 : FR1 = 0% FR1a. I just...
AI summary This section asks participants whether they had pre-existing plans to implement energy efficiency upgrades before joining the program and whether they would have paid for the upgrades without the rebate. The responses determine the mean value of the program's impact on cost reduction.
100% -[FR4_P/(FR4_P+FR4_NP)] FR2c. If you had not participated in the program, what is the likelihood that you would have implemented the energy efficiency upgrades that you implemented through the program but at a later date? (Scale 0 to...
AI summary The text presents a survey question (FR2c) asking participants about the likelihood they would have implemented energy efficiency upgrades at a later date without the program. If the response exceeds 5, a follow-up question (FR2cc) asks how many months later the upgrades would have been implemented, with specific response options and corresponding percentages.
Notes on the On-Site Evaluation (D) Quality assurance Appendix 1 Audit file number Name of the advisor Service Organization ENSProgram : QA done by: Date of Audit : Not/Applicable =task performed well task not completed Introduction requir...
AI summary The document outlines a quality assurance checklist for an on-site evaluation, including sections such as foundation, walls, and attic. It details tasks related to insulation types, moisture signs, and client communication.
Sampling error The amount of inaccuracy in estimating some value that is caused by examining only a portion of a population (i.e. a sample) rather than the whole population. Sample size The number of observations or replicates included in...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to statistical sampling and energy efficiency program evaluation, including sampling error, sample size, internal spillover, and tracked savings. These concepts are used by ENSC in evaluating program effectiveness.
PROGRAM COMPONENT OVERVIEW Fuel Substitution began in April 2011 and ran as a pilot until the end of that year. January 2012 saw the completion of the pilot phase and the launch of Fuel Substitution by ENSC. Fuel Substitution encourages ho...
AI summary Fuel Substitution, initiated in 2011 by ENSC, encourages homeowners to reduce electricity use for heating and domestic hot water by replacing electric systems with alternative sources. Eligible incentives include wood and pellet stoves, natural gas systems, and heat pumps. The program aimed for 2.7 GWh electricity savings and 1.2 MW demand savings in 2012.
KEY FINDINGS The evaluation of Fuel Substitution demonstrated that the transition from a pilot to a full program in 2012 was successful. The program totalled 282 participants for the year 2012, which is similar to previous year (296 partic...
AI summary The Fuel Substitution program transitioned successfully from pilot to full program in 2012, with similar participation levels to 2011 and slightly lower net energy savings in 2012 compared to 2011.
Table 1: Distortion Effects and Net-to-Gross Ratio 2012 Free-Ridership Level 32% Spillover Level 1% Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.69 The evaluation revealed that Fuel Substitution generated net energy savings of 1.549 GWh and demand savings of 0.85...
AI summary Table 1 presents distortion effects and the Net-to-Gross Ratio for 2012, showing a free-ridership level of 32% and a net-to-gross ratio of 0.69. The evaluation indicates that Fuel Substitution achieved energy savings of 1.549 GWh and demand savings of 0.857 MW at the generator in 2012.
Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 2.592 GWh 0.58 1.503 GWh Evaluation Results 2.245 GWh 0.69 1.549 GWh Demand Savings Track...
AI summary Table 2 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) program in 2012. The net energy savings are 3% higher than tracked savings due to an improved NTGR and lower free-ridership, but unitary savings for wood and pellet stoves decreased after billing analysis.
2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information Analyzing program documentation was the first task in the process evaluation for Fuel Substitution. At this stage, all of the available program information was reviewed. The information used to...
AI summary The first step in the process evaluation for Fuel Substitution involved analyzing program documentation. Information was obtained from the ENSC website, Program Manual, and Tracking Sheet to conduct this analysis.
2.2.3 On-Site Visits In October and November 2012, eight on-site visits were conducted in households that participated in Fuel Substitution. They were conducted by Econoler's subcontractor, Equilibrium Engineering. These visits were used t...
AI summary In October and November 2012, eight on-site visits were conducted in households participating in Fuel Substitution to validate new equipment, collect data on previous heating systems, and assess energy usage. The methodology is detailed in the Impact Evaluation section and Appendix III.
Table 3: Sample Size and Sampling Error Survey Population Sample Size (n) Sampling Error at 90% Confidence Interval 2012 Participants 2821 75 ±8.2% 2011 Participants 2962 28 ±14.8% 2.2.5 Ductless Mini-Split Heat Pump Research
AI summary Table 3 provides sample size and sampling error for surveys conducted in 2011 and 2012. The data shows a decrease in sample size from 75 to 28, resulting in an increase in sampling error from ±8.2% to ±14.8%. The section also references research on ductless mini-split heat pumps.
3.2.1 Program Manual A program manual is an important tool for the entire program staff, as well as for the Evaluator. Indeed, it serves as a program memory and can be particularly useful in case of staff changes. The program manual is int...
AI summary The program manual is a critical tool for program staff and evaluators, serving as a repository of information about program characteristics, objectives, and changes. The Fuel Substitution program manual now follows a standardized template with 10 sections, improving upon the 2011 version and incorporating key evaluator recommendations.
Table 4: Program Manual Content – Fuel Substitution Program Manual Content 2011 2012 Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives Eligibility criteria Prog...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the content of a program manual related to fuel substitution, detailing sections such as program description, objectives, incentives, eligibility criteria, and evaluation plans. However, most sections are empty, with only 'Program partners and their roles' and 'Partner or participant process flow chart' marked as 'N/A'.
3.2.3 Evaluation Plan ENSC has adopted the Evaluator's recommended template for an evaluation plan, which is included as an Appendix of the Fuel Substitution program manual. The program manager provided positive feedback on this important...
AI summary ENSC has adopted an evaluation plan template for the Fuel Substitution program, which complements the program manual. The Evaluator recommends adapting the template to better fit the program's needs, particularly by adjusting table structures to avoid unnecessary N/A slots.
3.4.1 Program Awareness Participants found out about the program in a number of ways. The main way was at the store where they purchased their new equipment (41%), which indicates the importance of retailers in program promotion. Survey re...
AI summary Participants learned about the program primarily through retailers (41%), with ENSC advertising (32%) and the Internet (24%) also being significant sources. This highlights the importance of multiple marketing channels in program promotion.
The main reason for participating in the program was to save on energy costs (with 81% having given this response as their most important motivation), followed by about one in 10 for better comfort (8%). There were a variety of answers fro...
AI summary The primary motivation for participating in the program was saving on energy costs, cited by 81% of participants, followed by improved comfort (8%). Communications should focus on emphasizing energy cost savings as the main benefit.
Of the 10 respondents who reported challenges, three identified a lack of technical knowledge, while two mentioned difficulty in finding good wood to burn or in having the equipment installed before the deadline. One respondent mentioned t...
AI summary Respondents reported various challenges, including lack of technical knowledge, difficulty in sourcing materials, installation deadlines, insufficient financing, and excessive paperwork, which hindered the adoption of energy-efficient equipment.
3.4.3 Program Influence Survey respondents were asked questions about the influence of the program on their decision to replace their heating system with another heating source. According to their responses, the program rebate was most imp...
AI summary Survey respondents indicated that program rebates were the most influential factor in their decision to replace heating systems, with a mean score of 7.8 out of 10. Information about the program and its promotion through media channels were considered less influential but still significant.
Table 11: Importance of Program in Influencing Decision Importance of Program in Influencing Decision to Replace Heating System with Another Heating Source 2011 2012 Sample Size 28 75 Mean (0=Not at all important, 10=Extremely important) P...
AI summary Table 11 presents data on the importance of various factors in influencing the decision to replace a heating system with another heating source in 2011 and 2012. Program rebate and information provided by salespeople were the most influential factors, while previous experience with similar programs had a lower impact.
Three quarters of respondents reported that there had been an improvement in their interest in energy efficiency (75% having given a rating of 5 or 4, where 5 is "considerable improvement") since participating in the program. A similar num...
AI summary Three quarters of respondents reported a considerable improvement in their interest in energy efficiency since participating in the program, with a similar number noting improved knowledge of energy efficiency.
Table 12: Improvements since Participating in Program 2011 2012 Improvements since Participating in Program Sample Size Satisfied Sample Size Satisfied Interest in energy efficiency 28 75% 75 75% Knowledge of energy efficiency 28 57% 75 71...
AI summary Table 12 shows improvements in interest and knowledge of energy efficiency among participants in a program from 2011 to 2012. The sample size increased, and satisfaction levels remained consistent at 75% for interest, while knowledge improved from 57% to 71%.
Table 13: Satisfaction with Overall Experience Satisfaction with Overall Experience 2011 2012 Sample Size 28 75 5 - Very satisfied 89% 77% 4 7% 15% 3 4% 7% 2 1% 1 – Not at all satisfied Don't know removed from calculations Among the small...
AI summary Table 13 shows a decrease in satisfaction levels from 2011 to 2012, with fewer respondents reporting being very satisfied. Dissatisfaction was attributed to poor communication, delays in receiving incentives, and the amount of incentives being too low.
Table 14: Reasons Not Satisfied with Program Reasons Not Satisfied with Program Most Important Reason Other Reasons Sample Size 6 6 Poor communication 2 Too long to receive the incentive amount/rebate 2 1 Incentive amount (rebate) is too s...
AI summary Table 14 outlines the reasons respondents were not satisfied with a program, highlighting issues such as poor communication, delays in receiving incentives, and the perceived inadequacy of rebate amounts. The data is based on respondents who rated their satisfaction as 1, 2, or 3 on a scale where 5 is 'Very satisfied' and 1 is 'Not at all satisfied'.
Respondents were highly satisfied with various aspects of Fuel Substitution. Nearly all were satisfied with the interaction and communication with ENSC staff (96%), the program application, forms and associated paperwork (96%), the systems...
AI summary Respondents expressed high satisfaction with various aspects of the Fuel Substitution program, including communication with ENSC staff, program application processes, installed systems, rebate timing, eligibility confirmation, and rebate amounts.
Table 15: Satisfaction with Program Aspects 2011 2012 Aspect of Program Sample Size Satisfied Sample Size Satisfied Interaction and communication with ENSC staff 28 100% 74 96% Program application, forms and associated paperwork 28 96% 74...
AI summary Table 15 presents customer satisfaction rates for various aspects of a program in 2011 and 2012, showing high levels of satisfaction with interactions with ENSC staff, program application processes, and installed systems, but lower satisfaction with rebate amounts.
Existing Programs Review The Evaluator conducted an exhaustive analysis on the existing residential incentive programs which include ductless mini-split heat pumps. This review was meant to learn more about the programs promoting this ener...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed residential incentive programs for ductless mini-split heat pumps, noting that only British Columbia in Canada and several U.S. states offer such incentives. Eligibility typically requires ENERGY STAR-rated equipment, with baselines often being less efficient heating systems. Rhode Island National Grid estimated a 15% free-ridership rate for these programs.
Table 20: Results from Existing Program Review Organization Baseline Eligibility criteria Free ridership LiveSmart British Columbia3 Electric baseboards ENERGY STAR-rated ductless mini-split heat pump or LiveSmart qualified inverter-based...
AI summary Table 20 presents a review of existing energy efficiency programs, comparing baseline systems, eligibility criteria, and free ridership rates. It includes programs from various regions such as British Columbia, Oregon, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and California, focusing on heat pump systems and their energy efficiency standards.
Interviews with Distributors of Ductless Mini-Split Heat Pumps The distributors of heating systems contacted during the interview process were asked to speak, among other things, about the impact on the market of the elimination of the duc...
AI summary Distributors of ductless mini-split heat pumps were interviewed about the impact of ENSC eliminating the rebate, standard market practices for heating systems, and their position on reintegration of the rebate into one of ENSC's programs.
Impact of the elimination of the ENSC rebate Distributors found sales of ductless mini-split heat pumps steady following the elimination of the rebate on this equipment. Several distributors noted that they saw a continued interest in duct...
AI summary The elimination of the ENSC rebate did not significantly impact the sales of ductless mini-split heat pumps, as distributors reported steady sales due to continued customer interest and the product's energy efficiency. Some distributors attributed this to ENSC's previous financial offerings and positive word of mouth, while others noted that the product's efficiency made it a standard choice in the market.
Reintegration of a ductless mini-split heat pump rebate into ENSC programs All distributors felt that ENSC should again include a rebate on ductless mini-split heat pumps within one of its residential programs. This opinion was largely due...
AI summary Distributors recommend reintegrating a rebate for ductless mini-split heat pumps into ENSC programs to ensure quality installations and prevent low-confidence in energy-efficient heating solutions. Concerns include low-quality products and improper installation by unlicensed contractors.
Survey with Participants from Home Energy Assessment Since ductless mini-split heat pumps were once rebated under HEA, but are now only recommended under the audit reports, a question was added to the HEA participant survey in order to ass...
AI summary A survey of HEA participants found that 46% would not have installed ductless mini-split heat pumps without the rebate, suggesting the rebate influenced some decisions. However, the small sample size (13 respondents) limits the reliability of this figure. The quality of equipment chosen without the rebate is also unknown.
Recommendation Upon the review of existing programs that include a rebate on ductless mini-split heat pumps, the feedback from distributors in Nova Scotia and the results from the HEA participant survey, the Evaluator has the following rec...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends reintroducing a rebate for high-efficiency ductless mini-split heat pumps in Nova Scotia, based on distributor feedback and HEA survey results. Distributors believe a rebate would encourage the installation of quality heat pumps, and the program should only cover units with a Tier 2 ENERGY STAR rating to ensure higher efficiency and reduce free-ridership.
Sampling Methodology Eight on-site visits were conducted under the 2012 evaluation of Fuel Substitution. The sampling was established from the tracking sheet provided by ENSC on September 2012. This list included 137 participants for 2012...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of Fuel Substitution involved eight on-site visits, with sampling based on a list of 137 participants provided by ENSC. The list included 140 units installed, as three participants had installed two different units each. Table 21 details the number of units installed and tracked energy savings by equipment type.
On-Site Visit Protocols On-site visits were used to verify the type of new units installed, as well as to collect information on the usage of different energy sources. An on-site visit protocol listing the information to be collected for e...
AI summary On-site visits were conducted to verify the type of new units installed and collect information on energy source usage. A protocol was developed to standardize the data collection process, focusing on heating and domestic hot water systems and their heat sources.
Navigant savings estimate reduced by Dunsky Consulting based on HOT2000 simulations. Navigant savings estimate reduced by Dunsky Consulting based on HOT2000 simulations and an electricity requirement of 700 kWh per year to operate pellet s...
AI summary Navigant's savings estimates have been adjusted by Dunsky Consulting using HOT2000 simulations. Adjustments include reductions for pellet stove electricity use and increases for DHW heating savings, as well as an adjustment for furnace electricity use.
# ECONOLE R Category of Equipment Old Annual Electric Consumption for Heating (kWh/year) New Annual Electric Consumption for Backup/Fans/ Pumps (kWh/year) Energy Savings Value (kWh/year) Adjusted Energy Savings Value (kWh/year) Old Annual...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data for various heating systems, comparing old and new annual electric consumption and demand values. It includes energy savings values and adjusted values for hybrid wood heating systems, central furnaces, propane furnaces, and gas tanked and tankless domestic hot water systems. The data also includes a note about an adjustment made to the savings estimate for hybrid wood heating systems.
Table 23: Revised Unitary Savings Values Based on the Billing Analysis Category of Equipment Annual Electric Consumption for Heating (kWh/year) New Annual Electric Consumption for Backup/Fans/Pumps (kWh/year) Revised Energy Savings Value (...
AI summary Table 23 presents revised unitary savings values for various heating equipment based on billing analysis, including energy savings, demand savings, and tracked energy savings values for different categories of equipment such as wood stoves, pellet stoves, and natural gas boilers.
Table 24: Revised Unitary Savings Values Based on the Literature Review Category of Equipment Tracked Energy Savings Value (kWh/year) Revised Energy Savings Value (kWh/year) Tracked Demand Savings Value (kW/year) Revised Demand Savings Val...
AI summary Table 24 presents revised unitary savings values for various energy-efficient equipment based on a literature review. The table compares tracked and revised energy and demand savings values, with notable increases for geothermal heat pumps and slight decreases for some other equipment. The section also mentions on-site visit results, indicating additional analysis or data collection.
Table 25: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings Category of Product Wood Stove Pellet Stove NG Combo Boiler Wood Furnace or Boiler Central NG Heating Gas Tankless DHW Gas Tanked DHW Gas Area Heater Ducted Central ASHP DWHR G...
AI summary Table 25 presents evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings across various products. It includes data on the number of units, unitary savings, and total gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels. The table highlights energy efficiency measures and their impact on savings.
Table 26: Evaluation Results – Revised Net Demand Savings Category of Product Wood Stove Pellet Stove NG Combo Boiler Wood Furnace or Boiler Central NG Heating Gas Tankless DHW Gas Tanked DHW Gas Area Heater Ducted Central ASHP DWHR Gas Ra...
AI summary Table 26 presents the evaluation results for revised net demand savings across various product categories. It includes energy and demand savings metrics, such as total gross energy savings, NTGR, line loss factors, and net energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Table 27: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 2.592 GWh 0.58 1.503 GWh Evaluation Results 2.245 GWh 0.69 1.549 GWh Demand Savings Trac...
AI summary Table 27 compares tracked and evaluated savings from energy efficiency programs in 2012. Net savings are slightly higher than tracked savings, attributed to a lower free-ridership level due to increased marketing efforts. However, unitary savings for popular products like wood and pellet stoves decreased after billing analysis, affecting overall energy savings.
October 24, 2012 INTRODUCTION Hello, may I speak with? Hello, my name is, from CRA (Corporate Research Associates). I am calling regarding our scheduled interview for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Home Energy Assessment program. Is...
AI summary A phone call from CRA (Corporate Research Associates) regarding a scheduled interview for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Home Energy Assessment program. The caller is checking if now is a good time to conduct the interview.
The program was formerly known as the "EnerGuide for Existing houses" program. Throughout the interview, I will refer to it as the "Home Energy Assessment" program. Thank you for taking the time to participate in this interview. CRA has be...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program, formerly known as the EnerGuide for Existing houses program, is being evaluated by CRA on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia. The interview aims to gather information about the program and the residential market, with responses kept confidential and anonymous.
SECTION R – RECOMMENDATIONS The first few questions will be specifically about the Home Energy Assessment program. R1. How familiar are you with Efficiency Nova Scotia's Home Energy Assessment program? R2. And how familiar are you with Eff...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document outlines a series of questions aimed at gathering information about the Home Energy Assessment program and related energy efficiency initiatives managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia. The questions cover familiarity with the program, barriers to delivery, requested upgrades, and suggestions for improvement.
SECTION M – MARKET I will now ask you questions about the residential market and the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's EnerGuide programs on the market. [ NOTE - TO BE READ IF NECESSARY: Efficiency Nova Scotia's EnerGuide programs are the...
AI summary The section discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's EnerGuide programs on residential market sales, mentioning the Home Energy Assessment program, Performance Plus program, and Low Income Homeowners program, and their role in providing energy efficiency ratings and audits.
M4. Even though the purchase and installation of mini-split heat pumps are not financed through Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs, their implementation is still recommended through some EnerGuide programs. Do you believe these recommendati...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions regarding the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs on the purchase and sales of mini-split heat pumps, including whether recommendations influence purchases, if there has been a sales decrease since 2012, and whether rebates should be reintroduced with efficiency criteria.
Well, this completes our interview. Before we conclude do you have any comments or suggestions or are there topics that we didn't address that you would like to talk about? On behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia, I thank you very much for you...
AI summary The interview concludes with appreciation from Efficiency Nova Scotia for the participant's time and contribution. No further topics or comments are mentioned.
APPENDIX III – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL 1 General Information Date of visit: Contact name in tracking sheet: Person met during site visit: ENSC project #: Telephone: Address: 2 Validation of installation
AI summary This document outlines an on-site visit protocol, including general information and a section for validating installations. It provides a template for recording details such as the date of the visit, contact information, and ENSC project numbers.
Home Heating System (i.e. All systems except Natural Gas Condensing DHW) From tracking sheet Contact declaration Date of installation: N/A Main energy source for heating before conversion and approx. % of total heating of the building enve...
AI summary The text presents a tracking sheet for home heating systems, excluding Natural Gas Condensing DHW. It includes fields for gathering information on the main and secondary heating systems before conversion, such as energy sources, system types, capacities, and AFUE ratings. The sheet is designed for data collection purposes.
From tracking sheet Site validation Energy source for new equipment used for heating and % of total heating of the building envelope provided (wood, natural gas, etc.) Type – New heating system installed (boiler, furnace, etc.) AFUE – New...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and site validation form related to heating equipment installation, including details on energy sources, system types, and efficiency certifications. The form is partially filled with some fields marked as N/A.
Introduction Hello, my name is ____________________ from CRA (Corporate Research Associates). I am calling on behalf of the Fuel Substitution Program from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). We are calling customers who used the pro...
AI summary CRA is conducting a survey for the Fuel Substitution Program from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), targeting participants who replaced electric space heating with alternative heating sources in 2012. The survey aims to gather feedback to improve the program, with confidentiality assured.
Program Awareness and Participation [P Series] - P1. How did you learn about the Fuel Substitution Program? PROBE: Anything else? [DON'T READ; ALLOW MULTIPLE RESPONSES] - 1. (Mailing/Email from Heritage Gas) - 2. (On the Heritage Gas websi...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to customer awareness and participation in the Fuel Substitution Program, including how participants learned about the program, reasons for participation, influences on their decision, and concerns they had before joining.
Program Satisfaction [S Series] - S1. Using a scale from 1 to 5, where 1='not at all satisfied' and 5='very satisfied', how would you rate your satisfaction with the Fuel Substitution Program OVERALL? [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE - RECORD NUMBER...
AI summary The text outlines a survey on program satisfaction related to the Fuel Substitution Program, asking respondents to rate their overall satisfaction, identify reasons for dissatisfaction, and evaluate specific aspects of the program such as application processes, communication, rebate amounts, and ease of participation.
[IF FR2c > 5, THEN ASK] FR2cc. DO NOT ASK FR2cc IF DON'T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your response to a previous question that if the Fuel Substitution Program had not been available there was an [FR2c] in 10 likelihood that...
AI summary The document presents a series of questions related to the likelihood of replacing heating or domestic hot water systems without a rebate and the time delay associated with such a decision. It also asks about the importance of factors influencing the decision. The questions are part of a survey or regulatory proceeding.
Impact of measures [IM Series] - IM1. Please indicate how each of the following has changed since participating in the Fuel Substitution Program? On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "no improvement" and 5 means a "considerable improvement"...
AI summary The document requests participants in the Fuel Substitution Program to rate improvements in their interest and knowledge of energy efficiency on a scale from 1 to 5. Some responses were refused or marked as 'Don't know'.
- 2. (Lack of information to make an informed decision) - 3. (Rebate/incentive was too little) - 4. (Paperwork/process required too much work) - 5. (Too little information about the program) - 6. (Cost savings not worth the effort of apply...
AI summary The text lists various barriers customers face when participating in energy efficiency programs, including lack of information, insufficient incentives, cumbersome paperwork, and lack of financing. These barriers hinder program participation and effectiveness.
Value of the program to customers [VP Series] VP1. Would you recommend the Fuel Substitution Program to a family member or friend? - 1. Yes
AI summary The document presents a question about recommending the Fuel Substitution Program to a family member or friend, with an option to answer 'Yes'. It is part of an evaluation of the program's value to customers.
PA1 Score: FR1. Had you already considered replacing or substituting your space heating or domestic hot water system with another heating source before you heard about the program? MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a; FR2b) IF 1 Yes: Use FR1a IF 2 OR 9:...
AI summary The text outlines a survey question (FR1) assessing whether participants had already decided to replace their heating systems before learning about the program, followed by a related question (FR3) evaluating the impact of a rebate from ENSC on their decision to purchase a new system.
ACRONYMS ARep Appliance Replacement ARet Appliance Retirement CFL Compact Fluorescent Lamp DA Delivery Agent DCS Department of Community Services EA Energy Advisor EEH EnerGuide for Existing Houses ENSC Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation H...
AI summary The text provides a list of acronyms and their corresponding full forms, including terms related to energy efficiency, appliance programs, and government departments. It includes references to organizations, programs, and regulatory bodies involved in energy and utility management.
PROGRAM COMPONENT OVERVIEW LIHS aims to facilitate the implementation of cost-effective building enclosure measures in residential low-income customer-owned households all across Nova Scotia by providing upgrades at no cost to the homeowne...
AI summary The Low-Income Home Upgrade (LIHS) program provides free building enclosure improvements to low-income homeowners in Nova Scotia, funded by electricity ratepayers and provincial funds. It includes insulation, draft-proofing, and appliance replacements, with the goal of achieving electricity and demand savings.
Program Energy Savings To calculate the net savings of LIHS in 2012, Econoler reviewed the gross savings using two features, namely the savings per EnerGuide point increase and the savings generated in relation to the implementation of a s...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy savings of the Low-Income Home Upgrade (LIHS) program in 2012. It calculates net energy savings of 2.209 GWh and demand savings of 1.047 MW using revised unitary savings values, interactive effects factors, and a net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) of 1, assuming insignificant distortion effects.
Table 1: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 2.292 GWh 2.202 GWh 1.00 2.202 GWh Evaluation Resu...
AI summary The document compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC's programs in 2012. Adjustments to gross energy savings per EnerGuide point and reductions in unitary savings for prescriptive measures were made, but these adjustments balanced each other, resulting in evaluated savings being very similar to tracked savings.
1 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Low Income Homeowner Service (LIHS) aims to facilitate the implementation of cost-effective building enclosure measures in low-income, customer-owned households across Nov...
AI summary The Low Income Homeowner Service (LIHS) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation provides free building enclosure upgrades to low-income homeowners. Measures include insulation, draft-proofing, and energy-efficient appliance replacements, funded by ratepayers or provincial funds. Participants may also qualify for the Residential Direct Install (RDI) program.
2.2.2 Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff met with the Program Manager (PM) in July 2012. The discussion allowed the Evaluator to understand all program elements, such as the program background, mechanisms and delivery.
AI summary Econoler staff met with the Program Manager in July 2012 to understand the program's background, mechanisms, and delivery, providing insight into the program's structure and implementation.
2.2.3 On-Site Visits In November 2012, three on-site visits were conducted at houses in which measures from LIHS had been implemented. This part of the process evaluation was carried out by Econoler's subcontractor ecoPlus Services, which...
AI summary In November 2012, three on-site visits were conducted to evaluate the implementation of LIHS measures. The visits were carried out by ecoPlus Services, ensuring EAs followed EnerGuide guidelines and collected necessary data for HOT2000 simulations. Sampling included different DAs and pre- and post-retrofit assessments.
2.2.4 HOT2000 Simulation Review As part of this year's evaluation, Econoler also collected and reviewed a sample of 20 HOT2000 simulations. The main purpose of this verification was to validate the input data and assumptions used by the EA...
AI summary Econoler reviewed 20 HOT2000 simulations to validate input data and assumptions used by Energy Advisors (EAs) to ensure they are realistic and align with actual residential buildings. The assessment was conducted by ecoPlus Services and detailed in the Process Evaluation section of the report.
oint of 817 kWh. This figure came from the 2011 program evaluation. - > Main heating system type, electricity heating percentage, number of prescriptive measures and respective unitary savings values. For projects pending the final energy...
AI summary The document discusses the use of tracking sheets for energy efficiency programs, including temporary estimation methods for energy savings based on projected EnerGuide ratings and the recommendation to standardize data entry to improve accuracy and understanding of savings calculations.
3.2 ON-SITE VISITS The on-site visits conducted as part of the evaluation of LIHS aimed to assess the procedure and the ecoEnergy protocol that the EAs have to follow during the assessments. The ecoEnergy protocol was established by NRCan...
AI summary The on-site visits evaluated the procedure and ecoEnergy protocol followed by EAs during LIHS assessments. The Evaluator observed that EAs adhered to NRCan guidelines, collected detailed data, and conducted accurate EnerGuide ratings using the HOT2000 software.
3.3 HOT2000 SIMULATION REVIEW The first point noticed during the HOT2000 simulation review was the high variability in professionalism and training found between DAs. Some of these organizations presented very accurate files that displayed...
AI summary The HOT2000 simulation review identified significant variability in the quality of work among delivery agents (DAs), with some producing accurate files and others making recurrent errors such as omissions, incomplete information, and calculation mistakes. Econoler recommends that ENSC implement a continuous review process to improve simulation quality and address training needs.
4.2 GROSS SAVINGS The tracking sheets provided by ENSC for 2012 contained a total of 811 participants. These participants were bundled with 1,839 participants from HEA to estimate an incremental energy savings per EnerGuide point (hereafte...
AI summary ENSC provided tracking sheets with 811 participants for 2012, which were combined with 1,839 HEA participants to estimate energy savings per EnerGuide point. Econoler adjusted prescriptive measure savings based on ENSC program findings and used parameters like incremental energy savings and demand-to-energy ratio to evaluate LIHS gross savings.
13-Watt CFLs ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh that was calculated by Econoler in last year's evaluation. The replacement of a 60-watt incandescent lamp with a 13-watt CFL is considered the base case for this product and has a...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh for replacing 60-watt incandescent lamps with 13-watt CFLs, calculated based on a daily usage of 2.7 hours. This value was validated using data from Hydro-Québec's study and adjusted based on ENSC's socket study from 2011.
23-Watt CFLs The unitary savings value used by ENSC for 23-watt CFLs is based on last year's evaluation of the Efficient Products – Direct Install program. Based on the data collected through this program specifically for residential build...
AI summary The unitary savings value for 23-watt CFLs is calculated based on data from the Efficient Products – Direct Install program. Econoler estimated that replacing 93.5 W incandescent lamps with 23 W CFLs results in an annual savings of 69.5 kWh. This calculation assumes a daily usage of 2.7 hours and is consistent with market data.
Specialty CFLs For the specialty CFLs, ENSC uses the unitary savings figure calculated in the 2011 Retail Markdown Program (RMP) evaluation. The analysis of specialty CFLs sold through the RMP revealed that the typical difference in wattag...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for specialty compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) used in the Retail Markdown Program (RMP) and Instant Savings program. It outlines the differences in wattage between the CFLs and the lamps they replaced, and provides equations to calculate annual unitary savings based on these values.
Flush-Mount CFLs and CFL Porch Lights For these two products, ENSC uses the same unitary savings value calculated for the specialty CFLs in 2011; i.e., 49.8 kWh per year. With this in mind, Econoler decided to keep the same approach and us...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 46.2 kWh per year for Flush-Mount CFLs and CFL Porch Lights, based on calculations from 2012, following the same approach used for specialty CFLs in 2011.
Programmable Thermostats For programmable thermostats, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 221 kWh per year. This value comes from the 2011 EnerGuide for Existing House (EEH) impact evaluation report. 1 In the 2011 RMP evaluation report,...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 221 kWh per year for programmable thermostats, derived from the 2011 EnerGuide for Existing House impact evaluation report. The value is also informed by a 2009 Hydro-Québec evaluation of residential electronic thermostats in new construction, which considered thermostat accuracy and temperature setback.
Table 2: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec's Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Calculation Parameters Single Detached Duplex / Triplex / Townhouse Apartment Gross Energy Savings for Electronic Thermostat Accuracy Saving...
AI summary Table 2 presents energy savings from electronic thermostats in different housing types, based on Hydro-Québec's research. Savings are calculated by comparing electronic thermostats with bimetallic ones, using data from environmental chambers and single-family homes. Annual consumption for electric space heating was estimated through a billing analysis involving 25,703 clients and 206,861 billing periods.
Power Bars with Integrated Timer ENSC promoted the installation of power bars with integrated timer through LIHS for the first part of 2012. This product helps reduce the standby power of the electronic devices plugged into it. Based on th...
AI summary ENSC promoted the installation of power bars with integrated timers through the LIHS program in 2012. These devices reduce standby power consumption, and ENSC used a unitary savings value of 53 kWh per year per installed unit, based on the OPA 2011 report.
Table 3: OPA Unitary Savings Estimate for Power Bars with Integrated Timer Parameters Entertainment Centres Computer Systems Lighting Others Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Average Wattage 38.1 W 28 W 60 W 28 W Old Operating Time 9 h/da...
AI summary Table 3 presents an OPA unitary savings estimate for power bars with integrated timers, showing annual savings of 53 kWh per year. The product was removed from the program in 2012, but Econoler recommends maintaining the validated 2011 savings value for this year's evaluation.
Dehumidifiers LIHS promoted the replacement of old dehumidifiers with more efficient models. In some instances, ENSC also installed dehumidifiers in households where there was no dehumidifier in place before the project. With regard to the...
AI summary The document discusses how ENSC promoted the replacement of old dehumidifiers with more efficient models and installed new dehumidifiers in some households. It outlines the energy savings assumptions used, including a unitary savings value of 686 kWh per year and 500 kWh based on different evaluations and reports.
Refrigerator Category Primary Secondary Average Consumption per Retired Unit 75.6 kWh/cu ft.× 14.2 cu ft. = 1,074 kWh/year Occupant Adjustment Factor 1.12 Partial Use Factor 1.00 0.71 Unitary Savings Value per Category 1,203 kWh/year 848 k...
AI summary The text presents data on energy consumption and savings from replacing old refrigerators with new ENERGY STAR® models. It includes average consumption, adjustment factors, and unitary savings values for different refrigerator categories, highlighting the energy savings potential of replacing outdated units.
Freezer Replacements LIHS supports the replacement of existing inefficient freezers with high efficiency models. For each replaced freezer, ENSC uses a unitary savings figure of 637 kWh per year. This value is based on the 2011 ARep evalua...
AI summary LIHS supports replacing inefficient freezers with high-efficiency models, using a unitary savings figure of 637 kWh per year based on 2011 ARep evaluation. In 2012, Econoler revised this value using updated data from NRCan EnerGuide Appliance Directory, showing older freezers consumed more energy.
Table 5: Unitary Savings Values for Retired Freezers 20 to 29 Years Old Freezer Category Secondary Average Consumption per Retired Unit 84.1 kWh/cu ft. × 13.9 cu ft. = 1,169 kWh/year Occupant Adjustment Factor 1.12 Partial Use Factor 0.85...
AI summary Table 5 provides unitary savings values for retiring freezers aged 20 to 29 years. It calculates average energy consumption of old freezers and compares it to new ENERGY STAR® models, showing a unitary savings of 765 kWh per replacement.
Refrigerator Retirements For this appliance retirement measure, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 1,016 kWh per year. This result was based on an average consumption of 1,373 kWh for the unit retired, a partial use factor of 0.74 and an...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 1,016 kWh per year for refrigerator retirements, calculated based on average consumption data from old refrigerators retired through ARet. In 2012, Econoler updated this value to 756 kWh using 2011 metering data and other factors.
Freezer Retirements For each retired freezer, ENSC uses a unitary savings figure of 1,274 kWh per year. This result was based on an average consumption of 1,223 kWh for the unit retired, a partial use factor of 0.93 and an occupant adjustm...
AI summary ENSC calculates energy savings from retired freezers using a unitary savings figure of 1,274 kWh per year, based on metering data and adjustment factors. In 2012, Econoler updated this figure to 950 kWh using new data and factors.
Low-Flow Showerheads ENSC calculated the energy savings achieved from the installation of low-flow showerheads only when the energy source for domestic water heating was electricity. For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 3...
AI summary ENSC calculated energy savings from low-flow showerheads based on a 0.75 gpm flow-rate improvement, using a unitary savings value of 377 kWh. Econoler validated the OPA's assumptions, though noted that current market showerheads have higher flow rates than the OPA's baseline of 2 gpm, suggesting the savings value is largely acceptable.
Table 6: Unitary Savings Values by Length of Insulated Pipe Length of Insulated Pipe Unitary Savings Value 3 feet 38 kWh/year 6 feet 76 kWh/year 9 feet 114 kWh/year 12 feet 152 kWh/year 15 feet 190 kWh/year 10 Environment Canada, "Wise Wat...
AI summary Table 6 presents unitary savings values for different lengths of insulated pipe, showing increasing energy savings with longer lengths. The table is sourced from Environment Canada's 'Wise Water Use' document from 2013.
Hot Water Tank Wraps For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for each installed system. This value was used in last year's evaluation and is based on the 2011 OPA Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 270 kWh per year for hot water tank wraps, based on the 2011 OPA report. The Evaluator reviewed OPA's assumptions and calculations, confirming the accuracy of thermal resistances and tank size, leading Econoler to conclude the savings value is adequate.
4.2.4 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for LIHS are presented in the table below. Energy and demand savings for the program were revised to reflect the calibrated savings per EnerGuide rating point and the savings from prescr...
AI summary The annual gross savings for the Low-Income Home Upgrade (LIHS) program are revised to reflect calibrated savings based on EnerGuide ratings and prescriptive measures. Total gross energy and demand savings amount to 2.070 GWh and 0.981 MW at the meter, with higher estimates of 2.277 GWh and 1.079 MW at the generator level, using a line loss factor provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC).
Product Category Fridge Replacement Freezer Replacement Fridge Retirement Freezer Retirement Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Showerhead Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank Wrap Total Energy Savings Total Number of Units 132 157 1 1 204 139 202 167 7,55...
AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings across various product categories, including fridge and freezer replacements, retirement, faucet aerators, low-flow showerheads, pipe insulation, and hot water tank wraps. It includes metrics such as total number of units, unitary savings, gross energy savings at the meter and generator, line loss factors, demand savings, and demand-to-energy ratios.
4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as space heating and cooling equipment. In the case of L...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects in energy efficiency measures, focusing on how replacing lighting with CFLs in LIHS impacts heating and cooling loads. The analysis uses a 1992 study by ADS and simulations with DOE-2 software, assuming 38% of LIHS participants use electric heating and no air conditioning. Interactive effects are calculated based on electric heating efficiency and non-electric heating systems.
Table 8: Interactive Effects Calculation for CFL Products Parameters % of Residences Interactive Effects Electric Heating with Air Conditioning 38% x 0% = 0% -54.4% Electric Heating without Air Conditioning 38% x 100% = 38.3% -58.0% No Ele...
AI summary Table 8 calculates the interactive effects of CFL products based on heating and air conditioning usage. The overall interactive effects for CFLs are adjusted to -20.9% after accounting for both indoor and outdoor installations, using data from a 2011 socket study conducted for ENSC.
$$(94\% \times -22.2\%) + (6\% \times 0\%) = -20.9\%$$ For pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through LIHS, interactive effects of -100 percent were considered during the heating period in electrically heated houses. This e...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of interactive effects for energy efficiency measures, such as pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, in electrically heated homes and those with air conditioning. It uses weighted factors based on heating and cooling degree-days in Halifax, resulting in a -25.5% interactive effects factor for lighting products.
Table 9: Interactive Effects Factor for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Parameters % of Residences Interactive Effects During Heating Period Interactive Effects During Cooling Period Electric Heating with Air Conditioning 38% x 0%...
AI summary Table 9 presents the interactive effects factor for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, showing the percentage of residences and their impact during heating and cooling periods. The weighted interactive effects factor during the heating period is -25.5%, and during the cooling period, it is 0.0%. Interactive effects for other products are considered negligible.
4.5 NET SAVINGS The net savings for the program were estimated using the interactive effects factors and the NTGR above. The equation below was used to calculate the net savings. Net savings = Gross Evaluation Savings × (1 + Interactive Ef...
AI summary The net savings for the Low-Income Home Upgrade program were calculated using the interactive effects factors and the NTGR. The results show total net energy and demand savings of 2.008 GWh and 0.952 MW at the meter, and 2.209 GWh and 1.047 MW at the generator.
Table 10: Evaluation Results – Gross and Net Savings Product Category Savings per EnerGuide Point 13-Watt CFL 23-Watt CFL Specialty CFL Flush Mount CFL CFL Porch Light Programmable Thermostat Electric Kettle Power Bar with Timer Dehumidifi...
AI summary Table 10 presents evaluation results for energy and demand savings across various product categories, including CFLs, thermostats, and dehumidifiers. The table includes gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factors, and line loss factors for each category.
Table 11: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 2.292 GWh 2.202 GWh 1.00 2.202 GWh Evaluation Res...
AI summary Table 11 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in 2012. Adjustments to gross energy savings per EnerGuide point and reductions in unitary savings for prescriptive measures were made, leading to evaluated savings that are very similar to tracked savings.
CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of LIHS demonstrated that the program is well designed and important to ENSC's program portfolio, considering that it targets customers who generally do not have the financial resources to undertake deep home...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Low-Income Home Upgrade (LIHS) program found it well designed and important to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). The program had 811 participants in 2012, with improvements made since the 2011 evaluation. However, there were noted issues with advisor thoroughness and variability in professionalism among delivery agents (DAs). The program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012.
APPENDIX I – RECOMMENDATIONS This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary 1. Consider the po...
AI summary The appendix outlines three recommendations related to the HOT2000 software. It suggests providing technical support for EAs, implementing a continuous simulation review process, and adding complementary information to improve tracking of unitary savings.
APPENDIX II – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL The other on-site visit protocols for LIHS are attached in PDF format to this report.
AI summary This section references additional on-site visit protocols for the Low-Income Home Upgrade (LIHS) program, which are provided in PDF format as part of the report.
RELEVANCE AND ACCURACY OF OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMANDATIONS MADE BY ADVISOR The advisor made an effort to collect as much information as possible about the house components / 5 The advisor understood the different sections of the house and...
AI summary The document evaluates the accuracy and thoroughness of an advisor's home energy assessment, noting precise measurements, understanding of building systems, and proper use of equipment such as the blower door test. The advisor was effective in identifying insulation, ventilation, and heating system recommendations.
ABILITY OF THE ADVISOR TO CONVEY HIS/HER OBSERVATIONS TO THE CLIENT The advisor explained his views in simple language which the client can easily understand / 5 The advisor made an effort to convince the client to undertake the recommende...
AI summary The text evaluates the advisor's ability to communicate effectively with clients during energy assessments. It highlights the advisor's use of simple language, thorough explanation of processes and reports, attention to client concerns, and adherence to safety and property respect.
RELEVANCE AND ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTED BY THE ADVISOR The advisor made a complete list of all of the relevant retrofits that were performed /5 The advisor collected all of the relevant invoices and pictures to clearly identify...
AI summary The document evaluates the advisor's performance in collecting accurate information about home retrofits and communicating findings to the client. It highlights the advisor's thoroughness in documenting renovations, verifying data, conducting tests, and ensuring client understanding.
DEFINITIONS Base case A base case details the information on how assumed gross savings used in the tracking sheet have been established. Usually, these savings are calculated with a series of variables such as hours of operation, wattage o...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency programs, including demand savings, distortion effects, free-ridership, and interactive effects. It also explains metrics such as the demand-to-energy ratio and line loss factor, which are used in evaluating program performance and energy savings.
PROGRAM OVERVIEW Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Performance Plus' main objective is to encourage homeowners and builders across Nova Scotia to exceed the required building code for energy efficiency in new homes, in order to i...
AI summary The Performance Plus program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation encourages homeowners and builders to exceed building code energy efficiency standards. It uses the HOT2000 simulation tool for analysis and provides incentives based on final EnerGuide ratings after construction. In 2012, the program changed to a global incentive structure tied to overall EnerGuide ratings.
Homeowner and Builder Involvement The vast majority of homeowners were involved early in the decision to participate in the program and in decisions related to the implementation of energy efficiency measures. The involvement of the homeow...
AI summary The document highlights the significant involvement of homeowners and builders in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing early communication with the public and the importance of informing builders about the program, with 74% of builders typically deciding to participate.
Program Energy Savings To calculate the net savings of Performance Plus in 2012, Econoler reviewed the gross savings estimated by ENSC using two features, namely the savings per EnerGuide point increase estimated in the Home Energy Assessm...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of net energy savings for the Performance Plus program in 2012, including adjustments to baseline EnerGuide ratings, the use of simulation data, and the impact of free-ridership and market effects on program outcomes.
1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Performance Plus' main objective is to encourage homeowners and builders across Nova Scotia to exceed the required building code for energy efficiency in new homes, in order...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Performance Plus program encourages homeowners and builders to exceed building code energy efficiency standards in new homes. The program is funded by electricity ratepayers and the Province of Nova Scotia, with incentives based on achieving specific EnerGuide ratings. Registration is required within 30 days of obtaining a building permit, and final evaluation includes a blower door test and EnerGuide rating.
Table 4: Rebates Provided by ENSC per EnerGuide Rating EnerGuide Rating Total Rebate 83 or 84 $3,000 85, 86 or 87 $5,000 88 or higher $7,000 Rebates are paid to the homeowner or occupant of the house unless the homeowner and builder decide...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the rebates provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) based on EnerGuide ratings for homes. Higher ratings qualify for larger rebates, with amounts ranging from $3,000 to $7,000. Rebates can be paid to the homeowner or transferred to the builder to reduce construction costs.
2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information Analyzing program documentation was the first task in the process evaluation for Performance Plus. At this stage, all of the available program information was reviewed. The information used to c...
AI summary The first task in evaluating the Performance Plus program involved analyzing existing program documentation. Information was gathered primarily from the ENSC website, the Program Manual, and the Tracking Sheet.
2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November 2012, two on-site visits were conducted at new houses in which measures from Performance Plus had been implemented. This part of the process evaluation was carried out by Econoler's subcontractor ecoPlus Se...
AI summary In November 2012, two on-site visits were conducted at new homes where Performance Plus measures were implemented. The visits, carried out by ecoPlus Services, aimed to ensure EAs followed EnerGuide guidelines and collected necessary data for HOT2000 simulations. The methodology is detailed in the Process Evaluation section and Appendix IV.
3.5.1 Perceptions Related to Program Changes A total of three DAs and three EAs were interviewed for the evaluation of Performance Plus. The program partners were asked, among other things, about their general satisfaction with the program...
AI summary Interviews with Distribution Agents (DAs) and Energy Advisors (EAs) revealed high satisfaction with the Performance Plus program, though some improvements were suggested, including better alignment of incentives with costs, increased public education, and expanded coverage of energy efficiency upgrades.
3.5.2 Relationships with Other Partners The majority of the program partners interviewed expressed a high level of satisfaction with respect to their relationship with ENSC staff. The Evaluator noted that the DAs seem to have a better rela...
AI summary The majority of program partners are satisfied with their relationship with ENSC staff, though DAs have a better relationship with NRCan than EAs. EAs reported a lack of support from NRCan, high staff turnover, and issues with the HOT2000 software being outdated and limiting.
3.5.3 Assessment Process Regarding the assessment process in general, all three EAs reported that the EnerGuide methodology is appropriate in the context of the program. They stated that they always make sure the protocol is well-explained...
AI summary The assessment process for the program involves using the EnerGuide methodology, ensuring proper explanation of the protocol to clients, and conducting blower-door tests. While blueprints are used instead of taking house pictures, some EAs suggest updating the Keeping the Heat In booklet to align with the latest Nova Scotia building code.
3.5.4 Opinion on Marketing Strategy The majority of the program partners expressed a very low level of satisfaction with respect to the promotional activities currently implemented, since they feel that the marketing is left up to them. Mo...
AI summary Program partners expressed low satisfaction with current promotional activities, emphasizing the need for improved marketing strategies. They suggested radio and newspaper campaigns to educate builders and the public about energy efficiency. There was a call for better dissemination of information on the HOT2000 model and Performance Plus, with a joint effort between ENSC and building offices recommended.
3.6.1 Program Awareness among Homeowners Participants found out about the program in a number of different ways, with ENSC sources being the primary channel. Specifically three in ten participants found out about the program from newspaper...
AI summary Participants learned about the program through various channels, with ENSC sources being the primary method. Other sources included media, word of mouth, and the internet, with specific percentages provided for each.
Table 7: Program Awareness among Homeowners Sources of Program Awareness 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 70 70 TOTAL ENSC SOURCES – 29% Newspaper/renovation guide ad or story 4% 13% Radio advertisement 7% 10% Home show (unspecified) 4% 9% EN...
AI summary Table 7 shows the sources of awareness about Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) programs among homeowners in 2011 and 2012. Contractors and the internet were the most common sources of awareness in both years, with word of mouth also playing a significant role.
3.6.2 Homeowner Involvement in Decision Making Nearly all participants (99%) were involved in the decision to participate in the program, and involved in decisions to implement energy efficiency measures (94%).
AI summary The text indicates that nearly all participants (99%) were involved in the decision to participate in the program, and 94% were involved in decisions to implement energy efficiency measures.
Table 8: Homeowner Involvement in Decision Making Homeowner Involved in Decision to Participate in the Program 2011 2012 Sample Size 70 70 Yes 76% 99% No/The builder was the only one involved 23% 1% Don't know 1% – Homeowner Involved in De...
AI summary Table 8 shows that homeowner involvement in energy efficiency programs increased significantly from 2011 to 2012, with 76% in 2011 and 99% in 2012. Findings highlight the importance of early public communication about energy efficiency programs, as most homeowners were involved in initial planning stages.
Table 9: Stage of Homeowner Involvement in Home Energy Efficiency Decision When Homeowner Became Involved 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 70 70 Initial planning/design stage 77% 77% After plan finalization, before measure implementation 6% 1...
AI summary Table 9 shows the stages at which homeowners became involved in home energy efficiency decisions in 2011 and 2012. The majority were involved during the initial planning/design stage, with slight changes in involvement rates across other stages.
3.6.3 Homeowner Motivations and Barriers to Participation Encouraging participation in the program may be best done by informing the public about potential energy savings. Saving money, either through having a home that would save on energ...
AI summary The main motivation for homeowner participation in energy efficiency programs is saving money through reduced energy costs or rebates. Energy efficiency as a general goal is also a significant motivator, with secondary motivations aligning with these primary drivers.
Table 10: Reasons for Participating - Homeowners 2011 2012 Reasons for Participating Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 53 52 69 68 To have a ho...
AI summary This table presents data on the reasons homeowners participated in energy efficiency programs in 2011 and 2012, with energy cost savings and rebates being the most significant motivators.
Table 11: Concerns with Program Prior to Taking Part Concerns with Program Prior to Taking Part 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 53 69 Yes 6% 10% No 94% 90% Base: Respondents who personally took part in the decision to participate in the prog...
AI summary Table 11 shows that in 2011 and 2012, a small percentage of participants had concerns about the program prior to taking part. Concerns included lack of information, time frame, paperwork, and cost of measures. Most participants (94% in 2011 and 90% in 2012) did not have concerns.
3.6.4 Program Influence on Homeowners Given that the primary motivation for participation was to save money, it is not surprising that the program incentive was very important in participants' decisions to build or buy a house with a high...
AI summary The primary motivation for homeowners to participate in energy efficiency programs is cost savings, with program incentives being a significant factor. The EnerGuide label, expert advice, and feedback during home plan reviews were also important, while previous experience with ENSC programs had less influence.
Table 13: Importance of Program in Influencing Homeowner Decision Importance of Program in Influencing Homeowner 20 011 20 )12 Decision to Build or Buy a House with a High Level of Energy Efficiency Sample Size Average Sample Size Average...
AI summary Table 13 presents data on the importance of various factors in influencing homeowners' decisions to build or buy energy-efficient homes. Factors like program incentives and the EnerGuide label are rated highly, while previous experience with specific programs has a lower influence.
3.6.5 Impact of Measures The program was successful at providing participants with increased home comfort, with nearly all participants in agreement that this was the case (94%).
AI summary The program was successful in providing participants with increased home comfort, with 94% of participants agreeing with this outcome.
Table 14: Impact of Measures on Comfort Level Measures Increased Home Comfort 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 70 70 Yes 96% 94% No 1% 4% Don't know 3% 1%
AI summary Table 14 shows the impact of measures on home comfort levels in 2011 and 2012, with a high percentage of respondents indicating an increase in comfort. The sample size remained consistent at 70, and the percentage of 'No' responses increased slightly from 1% to 4%.
3.6.6 Homeowner Satisfaction with the Program There was a high level of satisfaction with the program overall, and with specific aspects of the program. Nearly all participants were satisfied with the program overall (93%). The majority we...
AI summary The program received high overall satisfaction from homeowners, with 93% expressing satisfaction. Participants were particularly satisfied with aspects like the final energy assessment and scheduling of reviews. However, there is room for improvement in the information provided by Energy Assessors and the recommendations for measures, which received lower satisfaction ratings.
Table 15: Homeowner Satisfaction with Program Satisfaction with Program 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 70 70 Program overall 91% 93% Sample Size 54 53 First review of house plans, overall 89% 74% Scheduling and timing of review 85% 75% Repo...
AI summary Table 15 presents homeowner satisfaction rates with a program across 2011 and 2012. Satisfaction levels vary across different aspects of the program, with overall satisfaction slightly increasing from 91% to 93%. Some areas, like recommendations for energy efficiency measures, show a decline in satisfaction over the same period.
Some of those participants who were dissatisfied with the final assessment did not get the EnerGuide rating they expected, while other reasons for dissatisfaction included finding the EA unpleasant and the length of time to complete the fi...
AI summary Some participants were dissatisfied with the final energy assessment due to not receiving the expected EnerGuide rating, finding the energy auditor (EA) unpleasant, and the time required to complete the assessment.
Table 18: Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Final Assessment - Homeowners 2012 (#) Reasons Dissatisfied with Final Assessment Single Most Important Reason Other Reasons Sample Size 7 7 I did not get the EnerGuide rating I expected 4 2 I fou...
AI summary Table 18 summarizes the reasons homeowners were dissatisfied with the final energy assessment. Key issues included not receiving the expected EnerGuide rating, an unpleasant experience during the assessment, and long wait times. However, the program was largely successful, with 81% of participants achieving their target EnerGuide rating.
That said, there may be issues with communication during the review of house plan process, given that some participants who did not achieve the EnerGuide rating they were aiming for felt this was a result of not being informed of some meas...
AI summary Participants who did not achieve their desired EnerGuide ratings during the house plan review process expressed dissatisfaction, citing a lack of communication and information as contributing factors. Improving communication could help ensure participants achieve their targeted EnerGuide ratings.
3.6.7 Homeowner Recommendations for Improvements Recommendations for improving the program are perhaps not surprising, given the above-mentioned problems pertaining to communication and understanding which measures could or should be imple...
AI summary Participants in the proceeding suggested improvements to the homeowner program, including more marketing, better information on eligible measures, expanded rebate eligibility, and a simpler participation process. However, a significant portion of participants could not provide suggestions for improvement.
Table 23: Homeowner Recommendations for Improvements Homeowner Suggestions 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample size 70 70 More marketing/advertising 7% 10% Offer more information on the measures recommended 7% 9% Offer more measures eligible for reba...
AI summary The table presents homeowner suggestions for improving energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia from 2011 to 2012. Key recommendations include more marketing, clearer information, and faster certification and rebate processes. A majority of respondents had no specific recommendations.
3.7.1 Program Awareness among Builders ENSC advertising was important in communicating with builders about the program. Indeed, while participant builders found out about the program in a number of ways, ENSC was the primary way. One-half...
AI summary ENSC advertising played a key role in informing builders about the program, with ENSC sources being the primary means of awareness. Program delivery agents, seminars, and the ENSC website were notable sources, while the NSHBA member list was also mentioned as a source by some builders.
Table 24: Program Awareness among Builders Source of Program Awareness 2012 (%) Sample Size 50 TOTAL ENSC SOURCES 54% Program delivery agent from NSHBA 24% Program delivery agent from SHEC 14% Seminar or information session put on by deliv...
AI summary Table 24 shows the sources of awareness among builders regarding Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) programs in 2012. The majority (54%) were aware through ENSC sources, with the NSHBA program delivery agent being the most cited (24%). Other sources included SHEC, seminars, and the ENSC website.
3.7.2 Builder's Decision to Register under the Program Making builders aware of the program is important, given that they are usually the ones making the decision to participate in the program. While participants reported that they were ge...
AI summary The builder's decision to register under the program is crucial, as builders are typically the ones making the decision to participate. This is supported by participant reports indicating that builders most often made the decision to register.
Table 25: Builder's Decision to Register under the Program Builder's Decision to Register under the Program 2012 (%) Sample Size 50 I, the builder, usually make the decision 74% Future homeowner usually makes the decision 16% Both builder...
AI summary In 2012, 74% of builders made the decision to register under the program, while 16% indicated the future homeowner made the decision. High-efficiency insulation was the most commonly implemented measure, followed by high-efficiency windows, energy-efficient lighting equipment, and mini-split heat pumps.
Table 26: Measures Typically Implemented Measures Typically Implemented 2012 (%) Sample Size 50 High-efficiency insulation 84% High-efficiency windows 74% Energy-efficient lighting equipment 72% Mini-split heat pumps 64% Programmable elect...
AI summary Table 26 presents the percentage of measures typically implemented in 2012, based on a sample size of 50. High-efficiency insulation and windows are the most commonly implemented measures, while geothermal systems and oil boilers are less common.
3.7.3 Builder Motivations to Participation Builders primarily participated in the program to get rebates for measures they were already planning on implementing (38%). A smaller number were interested in building a better, more energy-effi...
AI summary Builders participated in the program mainly to claim rebates for energy efficiency measures they were already planning to implement (38%), with smaller percentages interested in building more energy-efficient homes (21%) or reducing energy costs for homeowners (14%).
Table 27: Reasons for Participating - Builder 2012 (%) Reasons for Participating Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 42 42 To get rebates for measures that we were already planning 38% 19% We were interes...
AI summary The table shows that the primary motivation for builders participating in energy efficiency programs is to receive rebates for measures they were already planning, followed by an interest in building more energy-efficient homes. Other motivations include cost savings for buyers, marketing appeal, and compliance with building codes.
3.7.4 Program Influence on Builders The program incentive was very important in influencing participant builders' decisions to build houses with a high level of efficiency, with an average score of 9.1 on a 10 point-scale where '10' is ext...
AI summary The program incentive played a significant role in influencing builders to construct highly efficient homes, with an average importance score of 9.1 out of 10.
Table 28: Importance of Incentive in Influencing Builder Decision Importance of Incentive in Influencing Builder Decision to Build Houses with a High Level of Energy Efficiency 2012 Sample Size 30 Average (0 = "Not at all important"; 10 =...
AI summary Table 28 highlights the importance of program incentives in influencing builder decisions to construct energy-efficient homes. The average score of 9.1 indicates that incentives are considered extremely important by builders. This data is based on a sample size of 30 respondents who indicated they would not have built the same number of houses without the program.
The program is highly regarded given that the large majority of participant builders believe the program provided considerable value to customers (96%) and to their company (88%).
AI summary The program is viewed positively by most participant builders, with 96% believing it provided considerable value to customers and 88% believing it provided value to their company.
Table 29: Program Impact Program Impact 2012 (%) Sample Size 50 Value of program to customers 96% Value of program to company 88% Respondents rating a '5' or '4' a on scale where 5 = "Considerable value" and 1 = "No value"
AI summary Table 29 provides a summary of the Program Impact from a 2012 survey with a sample size of 50 respondents. The majority of respondents (96%) found the program valuable to customers, while 88% found it valuable to the company.
3.7.6 Builder Satisfaction with the Program There was a high level of satisfaction on the part of builders. Nearly all participant builders were satisfied with the program overall (92%). Participant builders were also asked about their sat...
AI summary Builder satisfaction with the program was high, with 92% of participant builders expressing overall satisfaction. Most were also satisfied with the rebate process, which involves paying the rebate to the homeowner unless a written agreement transfers it to the builder.
Table 30: Satisfaction with Program - Builder Satisfaction with Program Sample Size 2012 Program overall 50 92% Process to receive rebate 47 77% Respondents giving a ratings of "Very satisfied" or "Satisfied" Don't know/Refused excluded fr...
AI summary Table 30 shows builder satisfaction with the program, with 92% satisfied overall and 77% satisfied with the rebate process. Dissatisfaction was cited due to lack of information, insufficient incentives, poor service, and delays in rebate processing and plan reviews.
3.7.7 Builder Recommendations for Improvements Suggestions to improve the program included speeding up the process to receive the rebates, offering more measures to be rebated, simplifying the process, increasing program marketing and adve...
AI summary The document outlines builder recommendations for improving the program, including speeding up rebate processes, offering more rebatable measures, simplifying procedures, enhancing marketing, and providing more information. A significant percentage of builders could not offer suggestions.
Table 32: Builder Recommendations for Improvements Builder Suggestions 2012 (%) Sample Size 50 Speed up rebates 16% Offer more measures eligible for rebate 14% Make process simpler/consolidate rebate programs/clarify report 10% More market...
AI summary Table 32 summarizes builder recommendations for improving energy efficiency programs, with the most common suggestions including speeding up rebates, offering more eligible measures, and simplifying the rebate process. A significant portion of builders provided no recommendations.
4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the program for 2012. Both energy and demand savings were considered in this evaluation. To do so, Econoler anal...
AI summary The impact evaluation for 2012 assesses both gross and net energy and demand savings, considering factors such as HOT2000 simulations, prescriptive measure savings, interactive effects, free-ridership, and market spillover. The evaluation used methods from the 2011 approach and included participant and builder surveys to calculate the net-to-gross ratio.
4.2 GROSS SAVINGS As mentioned previously, the 2012 evaluation of Performance Plus gross savings is essentially based on the HEA gross savings analysis. Within this latter program analysis, Econoler estimated the gross savings due to EnerG...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of Performance Plus gross savings is based on HEA gross savings analysis. Econoler used parameters such as incremental energy savings per EnerGuide point and demand-to-energy ratio to calculate gross energy and demand savings, with details provided in the HEA evaluation report.
Savings per EnerGuide Point ENSC calculates all building envelope and most of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system energy savings of Performance Plus using an incremental savings coefficient per EnerGuide point increase...
AI summary ENSC calculates energy savings per EnerGuide point for the Performance Plus program, using an incremental savings coefficient. The 2012 evaluation used a value of 914 kWh per EnerGuide point after adjusting for overestimation in HOT2000 simulations. This method applies only when the main heat source is electricity.
Electric DHW Heater Pipe Insulation Performance Plus proposed the installation of DHW heater pipe insulation where the DHW is electrically heated. For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 74 kWh. This value was used for the 2...
AI summary Performance Plus proposed electric DHW heater pipe insulation with a unitary savings value of 74 kWh, based on assumptions from the 2011 OPA report. Econoler noted this value corresponds to 6 feet of insulation, not the 10 feet assumed by ENSC.
Table 33: Unitary Savings Values by Length of Insulated Pipe Length of Insulated Pipe Unitary Savings Value 3 feet 38 kWh/year 6 feet 76 kWh/year 9 feet 114 kWh/year 12 feet 152 kWh/year 15 feet 190 kWh/year 6 Center for Energy Advancement...
AI summary Table 33 provides unitary savings values for different lengths of insulated pipe, ranging from 3 feet to 15 feet, with corresponding energy savings in kWh/year. The data is sourced from the Center for Energy Advancement through Technology Innovation (CEATI).
Programmable Thermostats For programmable thermostats, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 221 kWh per year. This value is based on the 2009 evaluation of Hydro-Québec's Residential Electronic Thermostats in New Construction program 7 whe...
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 221 kWh per year for programmable thermostats, based on a 2009 evaluation of Hydro-Québec's Residential Electronic Thermostats in New Construction program.
Table 34: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec's Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Calculation Parameters Single Detached Duplex / Triplex / Townhouse Apartment Gross Energy Savings for Electronic Thermostat Accuracy Savin...
AI summary Table 34 presents energy savings from electronic thermostats in different housing types, with values ranging from 61 to 121 kWh per thermostat. The savings were calculated based on research conducted by Hydro-Québec's laboratory of energy technologies, comparing electronic thermostats to bimetallic ones.
13-Watt CFLs For this product, ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh, which was calculated by Econoler in last year's evaluation. The displaced wattage is based on the replacement of a 60-watt incandescent lamp with a 13-watt CFL....
AI summary ENSC uses a unitary savings value of 46.3 kWh for 13-Watt CFLs, calculated by Econoler based on replacing 60-Watt incandescent lamps. The calculation assumes a daily usage of 2.7 hours, derived from Hydro-Québec's study and adjusted using data from ENSC's 2011 socket study. The displaced wattage value of 47 watts is deemed adequate for the calculation.
4.2.4 Revised Gross Savings Energy and demand savings for the program were revised to reflect the new calibrated savings per EnerGuide rating point and the savings from prescriptive measures presented in previous sections. For the calculat...
AI summary The 2012 overall gross energy savings for the Performance Plus program are estimated at 5.962 GWh at the meter and 6.558 GWh at the generator. Peak demand savings are estimated at 1.782 MW and 1.960 MW respectively. These figures consider transmission and distribution losses using a line loss factor of 1.100 provided by Nova Scotia Power.
4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of Performance Plus,...
AI summary This section discusses interactive effects in residential energy efficiency, focusing on how energy-efficient lighting like CFLs can influence heating and cooling loads. The analysis uses data from a 1992 study and adjusts for the proportion of electric heating systems and air conditioning units among program participants.
Table 36: Interactive Effects Calculation for CFLs Parameters % of Residences Interactive Effects Electric Baseboard Heating with Air Conditioning 13% x 18% = 2.3% -54.4% Electric ASHP or GSHP Heating with Air Conditioning 78% x 18% = 14.0...
AI summary This table calculates the interactive effects of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) based on different heating and air conditioning configurations in residences. The weighted interactive effects are determined to be -18.2%, but after adjusting for outdoor installations, the overall interactive effects are established at -17.1%.
$$(94\% \times -18.2\%) + (6\% \times 0\%) = -17.1\%$$ For pipe insulation installed through Performance Plus, interactive effects of –100 percent were considered during the heating period in electrically heated houses. This estimation is...
AI summary The calculation of interactive effects for water pipe insulation installed through Performance Plus considers –100% during heating periods and +100% during cooling periods. Using heating and cooling degree-days for Halifax, Econoler determined a weighted interactive effects factor of –19.0%.
4.4.2 Spillover (Market Effects) The marketing of Performance Plus is primarily conducted through builders who receive promotion and awareness documents on various energy efficiency measures. Consequently, market effects, which constitute...
AI summary The Performance Plus program's marketing through builders led to market effects, where non-participating builders also implemented energy efficiency measures. A 2012 survey with 57 builders found a 13% market effect, up from 5% in 2011, indicating the program's influence extended beyond participants.
ENERGY ADVISOR INTERVIEW GUIDE EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA PEFORMANCE PLUS PROGRAM October 1, 2012 INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _______, from Econoler. I am calling on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation for the Performance Plus Prog...
AI summary This document is an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia for evaluating the Performance Plus Program. It outlines the process for contacting participants and gathering information about their involvement in the program.
QUALITY OF THE P EVALUATION PROCESS (SIMULATION AS PER PLAN) The advisor received the blueprints from the homebuilder and the data recorded in his simulation matches the information contained on the blueprints / 5 The advisor made a reason...
AI summary The evaluation process for the P simulation was assessed based on various criteria, including accuracy of data collection, understanding of building design, and effectiveness of recommendations. The advisor demonstrated thoroughness in modeling the house and providing actionable, non-biased upgrade recommendations to the builder.
QUALITY AND PRECISION OF THE ''N'' EVALUATION PROCESS The advisor made a reasonable effort to verify what details were built exactly as on the / 5 blueprints and house that were built directly. Where differences between blueprints and actu...
AI summary The document evaluates the quality and precision of the ''N'' evaluation process, focusing on the advisor's efforts to verify construction details, use proper equipment, and conduct thorough assessments including blower door tests and combustion spillage tests. The advisor's adherence to safety, respect for client property, and timely report submission are highlighted.
INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _________ and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or...
AI summary CRA is conducting an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Performance Plus program, also known as 'EnerGuide for New Houses', and is seeking participant feedback to improve the program. The survey is expected to take about fifteen minutes.
Program Notoriety and Reasons for Participating – Homeowners (P Series) - P1. How did you learn about the Performance Plus program? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] - 1. (Efficiency Nova Scotia bill insert) - 2. (Efficiency Nova Scotia's Web...
AI summary The document lists various ways homeowners learned about the Performance Plus program, including through Efficiency Nova Scotia's website, bill inserts, program delivery agents, and word of mouth.
9. (I am generally interested in energy efficiency and renewable energy) 10. (To get rebates (general)) 11. (Energy efficiency (general)) 12. (To get expert advice on what measures to implement/how to make home more energy efficient) 96. (...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to energy efficiency programs, focusing on participant motivations, concerns, and experiences. It asks about reasons for participation, concerns about costs, and whether participants had any concerns before joining the program.
S4. Now I'm going to ask you about your experience with specific aspects of the Performance Plus Program. Using a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means "very dissatisfied" and 5 means "very satisfied", please tell me how satisfied you are with...
AI summary The text presents a survey regarding the Performance Plus Program, asking participants to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the program, including reviews, audits, scheduling, rebates, and information provided by Energy Advisors.
FR2a. built or bought a house with the exact same level of efficiency, reaching the same EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused
AI summary The document asks whether a respondent built or bought a house with an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher, with responses indicating 98 'Don't Know' and 99 'Refused'.
FR2b. with a high level of energy efficiency that has built or bought a standard house, with an EnerGuide rating under 83, instead of a house an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2c. EnerGuide rating of...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to energy efficiency, specifically focusing on EnerGuide ratings and the Performance Plus program. Respondents are asked about their likelihood of building or buying a house with a high level of energy efficiency and the timing of such decisions if the program had not been available.
FR3_1. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid you $[Total incentive] for the EnerGuide Rating of [EnerGuide Rating] that you achieved in your new house. If you had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid for the full...
AI summary The text asks respondents about their willingness to pay for energy efficiency measures in their new homes without rebates and rates the importance of the Performance Plus program and other factors in achieving high EnerGuide ratings. It includes response options and instructions for answering.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The program incentive Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. Expert advice provided by the auditor Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused c. Feedback received from the review of home plans Response 98 Don'...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to responses regarding a program incentive, expert advice, feedback from home plan reviews, the EnerGuide Label, and previous experience with the Performance Plus program. The data includes responses such as 'Don't Know' and 'Refused'.
Recommendations for Program Improvements (R Series) - R1. Do you have any recommendations for improving the Performance Plus program? PROBE: Anything else? - 1. (Offer more measures eligible for rebates) [GO TO R3] - 2. (Offer more informa...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for improving the Performance Plus program, including expanding eligible measures, improving information and marketing, streamlining processes, and enhancing auditor support. Respondents are asked to specify additional energy efficiency upgrades they would like covered by the program.
INTRODUCTION – PARTICIPANT BUILDERS Hello, my name is _________ and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our record...
AI summary CRA is conducting an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Performance Plus program, seeking input from participants regarding their experience and the residential new construction market. The survey is expected to take about fifteen minutes and is aimed at improving the program.
INTRODUCTION – NON PARTICIPANT BUILDERS Hello, my name is _________ and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. We wou...
AI summary CRA is conducting an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Performance Plus program, which incentivizes builders to construct more energy-efficient homes. The survey aims to gather insights from non-participant builders regarding the residential new construction market in Nova Scotia.
Verification of Measures Implemented (V Series) - V1. Do you typically implement any of the following measures as part of your participation in the Performance Plus Program? [FOR EACH MEASURE READ AND ROTATE, EXCEPT ASK N LAST, CODE: YES=1...
AI summary The document asks participants in the Performance Plus Program whether they typically implement specific energy efficiency measures, such as programmable thermostats, energy-efficient lighting, and heat pumps, among others. It also allows for the specification of other measures not listed.
Free-Ridership (FR Series) Now, I would like to examine the influence of the Performance Plus program on your decision to build houses with a high level of efficiency. - FR1. Without the Performance Plus program and its rebate, would you h...
AI summary The Free-Ridership (FR Series) section investigates the impact of the Performance Plus program on the construction of highly energy-efficient homes in Nova Scotia in 2012. It asks respondents whether they would have built the same number of homes with an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher without the program's incentives and assesses the program's importance in their decision-making.
Market Effects – Non Participants (M Series) We will now talk about the houses you have built in 2012 without participating in the Performance Plus program. - M1. Before today, had you ever heard of the Performance Plus program from Effici...
AI summary The document explores the market effects of the Performance Plus program on non-participants, specifically asking about awareness, participation, and implementation of energy-efficient measures in houses built in 2012 in Nova Scotia.
[IF VRP5=1 or 3 OR VR5=1 or 3, CONTINUE OTHERWISE SKIP TO S1] - P2. Now I'm going to ask you to think back to when you decided to participate in the Performance Plus program. What was the SINGLE most important reason you were interested in...
AI summary The text asks participants in the Performance Plus program to identify the single most important reason for their participation, with options including energy cost savings, environmental benefits, rebates, and marketing. It also allows for multiple reasons to be selected.
Participants FR2a. If you had not participated in the program, what is the likehood that you would have built or bought a house with the exact same level of efficiency, reaching the same EnerGuide? (Scale 0 to 10) FR2a = Answer x 10% FR2b....
AI summary The text presents two questions (FR2a and FR2b) aimed at assessing the impact of a program on participants' decisions regarding home energy efficiency. FR2a asks about the likelihood of achieving the same EnerGuide rating without the program, while FR2b evaluates the likelihood of opting for a standard house instead of one with a higher EnerGuide rating.
PA1 Score: FR1. Did you decide to build or buy a house with a high level of energy efficiency, reaching an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher, before participating in the program? MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a; FR2b) IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a IF 2 OR 9 : F...
AI summary The text outlines a survey question (FR1) asking whether participants decided to build or buy an energy-efficient home with an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher before joining the program. It also includes a follow-up question (FR3) about willingness to pay for additional energy efficiency measures without a rebate.
Builders FR1. Without the program and its rebate, would you have built the same number of houses with the exact same level of efficiency? IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a IF 2 OR 9: FR1 = 0% FR1a. I just want to make sure I understand – If the program...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions to builders regarding the impact of a program offering rebates for constructing energy-efficient homes with an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher. It asks whether the program influenced the number of houses built and their efficiency levels.
PA1 Score: IF FR1 = 0% : FR2 / 2 OTHERWISE : FR1 FR3. Rate the importance of the program and the incentive it offers in your decision to build houses reaching an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher?(Scale 0 to 10) $FR3 = (10 - Answer) \times...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring formula for a program aimed at encouraging the construction of houses with an EnerGuide rating of 83 or higher. The formula uses FR1 and FR2 to determine the score, with FR3 being calculated based on a response scale from 0 to 10.
Notes on the On-Site Evaluation (D) Quality assurance Appendix 1 Audit file number Name of the advisor Service Organization ENSProgram : QA done by: Date of Audit : Not/Applicable =task performed well task not completed Introduction requir...
AI summary The document outlines a quality assurance checklist for on-site evaluations conducted under the ENSProgram. It includes sections for audit details, introduction, and various building components such as foundations, walls, and attics, with notes on required equipment, client information, and recommendations.
Program Influence and Impact While free installation of energy-efficient products is the main factor influencing the decision to install such products, it should be noted that information or advice provided by the program advisor during th...
AI summary The program's influence on energy-efficient product installation is primarily due to free installation, but information and advice from program advisors also play a significant role. Half of the households reported behavioral changes in energy use after receiving information during installation. The program should continue to provide educational support and improve communication.
3.5.2 Motivations and Barriers to Participation When the respondents were asked about their most important motivation for program participation, saving on energy or energy costs was mentioned most frequently (69% of participants offering t...
AI summary The most important motivation for program participation among respondents was saving on energy or energy costs, cited by 69% of participants. Other motivations included the program being free (8%), receiving CFLs (7%), LEDs (1%), or contributing to environmental protection (3%).
Respondents were asked to rate the importance of various factors in their decision to install energy-efficient products. The results have revealed that free installation of energy-efficient products offered by the program was a major influ...
AI summary Respondents rated the importance of factors influencing their decision to install energy-efficient products. Free installation was the most important factor with a mean of 8.4, followed by information/advice from the program (7.9), and previous experience with other programs (4.9). Ratings were consistent across products and services.
Table 9: Importance of Factors in Influencing Decision Importance of Factors in Influencing Decision to Install Energy-Efficient Products Overall CFLs Low Flow Shower heads Faucet Aerators Pipe Insulation, Tank Wraps Sample Size 181 175 87...
AI summary Table 9 presents survey results on the importance of various factors influencing the decision to install energy-efficient products. Factors such as free installation and advice from program advisors are rated highly, while previous experience with similar programs is rated lower.
3.5.4 Program Impact The majority of the households remembered receiving information about energy-efficient products during the installer's visit to their home (75%). One half of the households who received information about energy-efficie...
AI summary A majority of households (75%) remembered receiving information about energy-efficient products during an installer's visit, and nearly half (49%) indicated that this information influenced their energy consumption behavior, highlighting the effectiveness of in-home education on energy efficiency.
3.5.5 Satisfaction with the Program Participants were highly satisfied with various aspects of the program. Ninety-six percent were satisfied with the program overall, while nearly all of them were satisfied with the time required to compl...
AI summary Participants expressed high satisfaction with the program, with 96% overall satisfaction and strong approval of aspects such as time required, quality of work, energy conservation measures, and communication.
Table 12: Satisfaction with Program Satisfaction with Program 2012 Sample Size % Program overall 179 96% Time required to complete the work 181 98% Quality of the work completed 181 97% Energy conservation measures installed 175 96% Overal...
AI summary Table 12 shows high satisfaction levels with the program, with 96% of respondents expressing satisfaction overall. Key reasons for satisfaction include good service, energy savings, and positive experiences with installers and communication.
Table 13: Reasons for Satisfaction with Program Reasons for Satisfaction 2012 Sample Size 171 I liked the installer who visited the home 35% Good service 28% Saves energy 23% Lowered energy bill 20% Information received/informative 20% Pro...
AI summary Table 13 presents the reasons for satisfaction with a program in 2012, based on a sample size of 171 respondents. The most common reasons included liking the installer, good service, energy savings, and lower energy bills.
A small number of participants were dissatisfied with the program (n=8), giving various reasons for their dissatisfaction. Some did not like the installer who visited their home, some did not like the item installed (including insulation o...
AI summary A small number of participants (n=8) expressed dissatisfaction with the program, citing issues such as dissatisfaction with installers, installed items (like insulation or light bulbs), and lack of perceived energy bill reductions.
Although the majority (67%) of the participants did not offer any recommendations for improvements, those who did mentioned the following: a better advertising campaign or stronger efforts to build program awareness (13%); a wider range of...
AI summary Most participants (67%) did not provide recommendations for improvements. Those who did suggested enhancing advertising campaigns, increasing program awareness, offering a wider range of products, providing more product information, and improving overall communication.
Table 17: Recommendations for Improvements Participant Suggestions 2012 Sample Size 181 Better advertising/program awareness 13% Offer more products/measures to be installed 6% Offer more information on the products/measures installed 5% I...
AI summary Table 17 outlines participant suggestions for improving energy programs in 2012. The majority (67%) indicated no other recommendations, while others suggested better advertising, more products, improved communication, and compensation for larger projects.
Sampling Methodology A total of 100 on-site visits were conducted as part of the 2012 evaluation of ENSC's RDI program. The sampling was carried out in September 2012 based on the tracking sheet, which contained the list of participants an...
AI summary A sampling methodology was used in the 2012 evaluation of ENSC's RDI program, involving 100 on-site visits. The sampling focused on households with specific energy-efficient products installed and excluded pilot initiatives from earlier in the year. Key regions and multi-unit residential buildings were considered in the selection process.
On-Site Visit Protocol The on-site visits were conducted to validate the installation of the products according to the data found in the tracking sheet and to establish the percentage of products removed, if any, and the causes for removin...
AI summary An on-site visit protocol was implemented to verify product installations, assess removal rates, and collect technical data to validate assumptions about product unitary savings, including lighting products, hot water tank wraps, faucet aerators, and low-flow showerheads.
Table 19: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of CFL Category of CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 13W replacing 40W 40 13 27 2.7 26.6 13W rep...
AI summary Table 19 presents unitary savings values for different categories of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), showing the displaced wattage and annual energy savings based on old and new wattage ratings and hours of operation. The table includes categories such as 13W replacing 40W, 13W replacing 60W, and specialty CFLs.
Table 21: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of CFL Category of CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Tracked Value 13W replacing 40W 40 13 27 2....
AI summary Table 21 presents revised unitary savings values for different categories of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) based on wattage displacement and hours of operation. The data shows the energy savings achieved by replacing higher wattage bulbs with lower wattage CFLs, with calculations performed by Econoler for the pilot initiatives.
Table 22: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of LED Category of LED Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 8W replacing 40W 40 8 32 2.7 31.5 8W replac...
AI summary Table 22 provides unitary savings values for different categories of LED lamps based on wattage displacement and hours of operation. ENSC used a standard unitary savings value of 39.4 kWh for all LED lamps installed through pilot initiatives, despite varying wattage displacements.
Displaced Wattage The different possibilities of replacements proposed by ENSC with LED lamps are consistent with the light output equivalencies defined by the manufacturer for similar products. Therefore, Econoler concludes that ENSC's di...
AI summary Econoler finds ENSC's displaced wattage calculations adequate, as they are based on real wattage values of old and new LED lamps, consistent with manufacturer-defined light output equivalencies.
Table 23: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of LED Category of LED Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Tracked Value 8W replacing 40W 40 8 32 2.68...
AI summary Table 23 presents revised unitary savings values for different categories of LED lamps, based on wattage displacement and hours of operation. Econoler calculated these values using proportions of LED lamps installed in each category during pilot initiatives.
Table 24: Tracked Unitary Savings Value for LED Nightlights Parameter Value Old Wattage (incandescent nightlight) 7 W New Wattage (LED nightlight) 0.3 W Average Displaced Wattage 6.7 W Operating Time 12 h/day Unitary Savings 29.3 kWh/year...
AI summary Table 24 provides data on the energy savings from replacing incandescent nightlights with LED nightlights, including wattage, operating time, and unitary savings in kWh per year. The table highlights the efficiency improvement and energy reduction achieved through this replacement.
Table 25: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Low-Flow Showerheads Parameters 0.5 gpm 0.75 gpm 1.0 gpm Reduction Reduction Reduction Unitary Savings Value 251 kWh 377 kWh 503 kWh Revised Savings
AI summary Table 25 presents unitary savings values for low-flow showerheads at different flow rates, showing the energy savings in kilowatt-hours for 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 gallons per minute. The table is titled 'Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Low-Flow Showerheads' and includes a section labeled 'Revised Savings'.
Econoler reviewed these unitary savings values, based on the engineering equations used by other jurisdictions to estimate energy savings from the installation of a low-flow showerhead. The conclusion of this analysis is presented in the t...
AI summary Econoler evaluated unitary savings values from low-flow showerhead installations using engineering equations from other jurisdictions, with the conclusion presented in a table.
Table 26: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Low-Flow Showerheads Parameters 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Old Flow Rate 1.75 gpm 2.00 gpm 2.25 gpm New Flow Rate 1.25 gpm Average Number of Showers 2.3 showers/day A...
AI summary Table 26 provides revised unitary savings values for low-flow showerheads based on different flow rate reductions. The table includes parameters such as old and new flow rates, average number of showers, average showering time, and corresponding unitary savings values in kilowatt-hours.
Table 27: Unitary Savings Values by Length of Insulated Pipe Length of Insulated Pipe Unitary Savings Value 3 feet 38 kWh/year 6 feet 76 kWh/year 9 feet 114 kWh/year 12 feet 152 kWh/year 15 feet 190 kWh/year While three feet seems to be a...
AI summary Table 27 provides unitary savings values for different lengths of insulated pipe, ranging from 3 to 15 feet. The text explains that residential pipe insulation lengths typically vary between 6 and 15 feet due to installation constraints, and savings calculations assume installation near the hot-water storage tank to maximize heat loss reduction.
Table 28: Main Outputs from Hydro-Québec's Evaluation of Electronic Thermostat Savings Housing Type Gross Energy Savings per Thermostat Single-Detached Duplex / Triplex / Townhouse Apartment Unitary savings for electronic thermostat accura...
AI summary Table 28 presents Hydro-Québec's evaluation of energy savings from electronic thermostats in different housing types. ENSC used a conservative estimate of 221 kWh for single-detached homes, as data on housing type was unavailable in the previous tracking sheet, and single-detached homes are a significant portion of the Nova Scotia market.
4.2.10 Installation Rate During the 2011 evaluation of ENSC's residential direct install programs, a few discrepancies were found in the quantity of products installed when compared to the quantity claimed in the tracking sheet. However, t...
AI summary During the 2011 evaluation of ENSC's residential direct install programs, discrepancies were found between the number of products installed and those recorded in the tracking sheet. In 2012, the number of on-site visits was increased to 100 to improve validation and establish accurate installation rates, with exceptions for thermostats and electric kettles, which had a 100% installation rate.
Table 29: Percentages of Products Installed and Installation Ratesed Category of Product Quantity Installed – From Tracking Sheet Quantity Installed – From On-Site Visits Percentage of Products Installed Installation Rate Error Margin19 CF...
AI summary Table 29 shows high installation rates for energy-efficient products, with minimal discrepancies between tracking sheet data and on-site visits. The data indicates very low product removal rates, contributing to high installation rates across various product categories.
Table 30: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings by Product (Lighting Products) CFLs LED Lamps Category of Product 13W Replacing 40W 13W Replacing 60W 23W Replacing 60W 23W Replacing 100W Specialty CFLs 8W Replacing 40W 8W Re...
AI summary Table 30 presents evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings by product category, focusing on lighting products such as CFLs and LED lamps. It includes data on the number of units installed, installation rates, unitary savings values, and total gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Table 31: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings by Product (Other Products) Low-Flow Showerhead Total Category of Product Faucet Aerator 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Pipe Insulation Hot Water Tank W...
AI summary Table 31 provides evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings by product category, including data on installation rates, energy savings, and demand savings across various products like low-flow showerheads, pipe insulation, and thermostats, with total gross energy savings at the generator level amounting to 46.427 GWh and total gross demand savings at 10.585 MW.
Table 32: Interactive Effects Calculation for Lighting Products Parameter % of Residences 22 Interactive Effects 23 Electric heating with air conditioning 32% × 18% = 5.8% -54.4% Electric heating without air conditioning 32% × 82% = 26.2%...
AI summary Table 32 calculates the interactive effects of lighting products on different heating and air conditioning configurations in residences. The weighted interactive effects factor is -17.9%, indicating a net negative impact across all scenarios.
_ & lt;sup>20 DOE-2 is a widely used and accepted software building energy analysis program developed under funding from the U.S. Department of Energy. & lt;sup>21 Statistics Canada (CANSIM), Households having air conditioning, Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects of energy-saving products, particularly CFLs and LED lamps, on energy consumption. It notes that CFLs installed outdoors have their interactive effects adjusted based on installation proportions, while LED lamps maintain a consistent interactive effects factor. Data from a 2011 socket study for ENSC is referenced.
Table 34: Interactive Effects Factor for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Parameters % of Residences25 Interactive Effects During Heating Period Interactive Effects During Cooling Period Electric heating with air conditioning 32% ×...
AI summary Table 34 presents the interactive effects factor for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps in different residential heating and cooling scenarios. The weighted interactive effects factor during the heating period is -18.3%, while during the cooling period it is +3.1%. Other products have negligible interactive effects.
Table 36: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product (Lighting Products) CFLs LED Lamps Category of Product 13W Replacing 40W 13W Replacing 60W 23W Replacing 60W 23W Replacing 100W Specialty CFLs 8W Replacing 40W 8W Repl...
AI summary Table 36 presents the evaluation results of net energy and demand savings by product category for lighting products, including CFLs and LED lamps. It includes metrics such as gross energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, line loss factor, and net energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Table 37: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product (Other Products) Low-Flow Showerhead Hot Total Category of Product Faucet Aerator 0.5 gpm Reduction 0.75 gpm Reduction 1.0 gpm Reduction Pipe Insulation Water Tank Wra...
AI summary Table 37 presents evaluation results for net energy and demand savings by product category, including low-flow showerheads, pipe insulation, water tank wraps, and other products. The table includes gross and net energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, along with factors such as interactive effects and line loss.
Table 38: Comparisons of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 46.127 GWh 46....
AI summary Table 38 compares tracked and evaluated savings at the generator level, showing slight differences between energy and demand savings calculated by ENSC and the evaluator. The net energy values are 4% higher than tracked savings due to differences in parameters used for estimation.
For energy-efficient lighting products: Product Number in Tracking Sheet Number On-Site Explanation, If Different Type of Lamp Replaced Wattage of Lamp replaced 13W CFLs 23W CFLs Specialty CFLs
AI summary The text outlines a table tracking energy-efficient lighting products, including Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) of varying wattages, though specific details such as quantities and explanations are missing.
For energy-efficient domestic water heating products: Tank Size (in gallons): Product Number in Tracking Sheet Number On-Site Explanation, If Different Locations Hot Water Tank Wrap N/A Pipe Insulation N/A Kitchen Faucet Aerators Bathroom...
AI summary The document contains a table with energy-efficient domestic water heating products, including tank sizes, product types, and tracking information. However, the table appears to be incomplete or in progress, as several fields are left blank or marked as 'N/A'.
- 2. No, I don't remember the program / Don't know [PROMPT: "Are you sure? Someone would have come to your house and installed free energy-efficient products for you to save energy and money?" RECODE AS "YES" IF THE PROMPT WORKS; IF RESPON...
AI summary The text outlines a survey or interview process to determine if a respondent participated in the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, including prompts and follow-up questions based on their responses.
Verification and Recall [V Series] V3. I am going to read you a list of energy-efficient products that, according to our records, were installed in your house by the program: [READ WHAT IS ON RECORD (MEASURE≠0 IN THE DATABASE)]. For each o...
AI summary This section of the document outlines a verification and recall process for energy-efficient products installed in a respondent's home by a program. It asks the respondent to confirm if the listed products were installed and provides options for response.
- 1. (Lowered energy bill) - 2. (Good service) 99. (Refused) - 3. (Saves energy) - 4. (Better lights/lighting) - 5. (Informative/Information received) - 6. (I liked the installer who visited the home) - 96. (Other) [SPECIFY _______________...
AI summary The text presents a survey with customer feedback on a program, including satisfaction ratings for various aspects such as energy savings, service quality, and lighting improvements. It includes response options and instructions for participants.
S10. Did your household receive information during the visit from the installer about energy-efficient products? 1. Yes
AI summary The text asks whether a household received information about energy-efficient products during an installer visit. The response is 'Yes'.
Recommendations (R Series) - R1. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the program? PROBE: Anything else? [DO NOT READ, ACCEPT MULTIPLE] - 1. (Offer more products/measures to be installed) - 2. (Offer more infor...
AI summary The document presents a series of recommendations aimed at improving an energy efficiency program. Respondents are asked to suggest ways to enhance the program, including offering more products, improving communication, and increasing work quality. If respondents select the option to offer more products, they are asked to specify which energy efficiency products they would like to have installed.
[IF ONLY ONE MEASURE VERIFIED IN V3-V4, SKIP TO FR4] The next questions will be about the [MEASURE 2] you had installed through the program. FR1M2. Did you or anyone in your household have specific plans to purchase and install [MEASURE 2]...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at determining whether participants in the Residential Direct Installation Program had pre-existing plans to install [MEASURE 2] and assessing the likelihood they would have taken similar actions without the program.
FR2aM2. installed the [MEASURE 2] that was installed through the Program? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2cM2. installed the [MEASURE 2] that was installed through the Program but at a later date? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused IF...
AI summary The document includes survey questions related to the installation of energy-efficient measures through the Residential Direct Installation program, asking respondents about the timing of installation and whether they would have installed the measures later if the program was not available.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The free installation of energy efficient products offered by the program Response 98 Don't Know99 Refused 97 Not applicable b. Information or advice provided by the program advisor during the insta...
AI summary The text presents a randomized factor and responses related to customer experiences with energy efficiency programs, including free installation of products, advice from program advisors, and previous experience with similar programs. It also references a 'Spillover [SO Series]' section, though no details are provided.
PA3 Score: FR2c. If you had not participated in the program, what is the likelihood that you would have installed the energy-efficient products but at a later date? (Scale 0 to 10) FR2cc. Approximately how many months later would you have...
AI summary The text asks respondents about the likelihood of installing energy-efficient products at a later date if they had not participated in the program and estimates the time delay in months.
Common Areas Rental Units - > CFLs; > CFLs; - > LED exit signs; and > faucet aerators; - > LED lamps; > LED nightlights; - > hot water tank wraps. > low-flow showerheads; - > pipe insulation; and - > hot water tank wraps. MURB aimed to ach...
AI summary The Common Areas Rental Units initiative includes measures such as LED lamps, faucet aerators, and hot water tank wraps, aimed at achieving electricity and demand savings. The MURB program targeted 2.6 GWh of electricity savings and 0.6 MW of demand savings in 2012.
Installation of Products The 2011 evaluation revealed some issues associated with the installation rate of certain products, such as power bars. This product was removed from the program in 2012 and, for this year's evaluation, the on-site...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation identified issues with the installation rate of certain products like power bars, leading to their removal from the program in 2012. For this year's evaluation, on-site visits showed very high installation rates, with most products installed through the program still in place.
MURB-R2. Continue offering information about products installed and energy efficiency: There is a need for an energy efficiency program in the multi-unit renter market, as multi-unit renters are often less interested in energy efficiency a...
AI summary The document highlights the need for energy efficiency programs targeting multi-unit renters, who are less likely to install energy-efficient products. It also recommends improving data collection methods, such as tracking products by unit number instead of tenant names, and enhancing the tracking sheet to better evaluate savings and facilitate field activities.
Common Areas Rental Units - > CFLs; > CFLs; - > LED exit signs; and > faucet aerators; - > hot water tank wraps. > low-flow showerheads; - > LED lamps; > LED nightlights; - > pipe insulation; and - > hot water tank wraps. In 2011, under th...
AI summary The Common Areas Rental Units program includes energy efficiency upgrades like LED lighting, faucet aerators, and hot water tank wraps. Funding for electricity-related upgrades comes from rate-payers, while other fuel-related upgrades are funded by the Province of Nova Scotia. Savings from these upgrades are tracked under the Commercial Direct Install targets and the Existing Houses program.
2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information Analyzing program documentation was the first task in the process evaluation for MURB. At this stage, all of the available program information was reviewed. The information used to conduct this...
AI summary The analysis of existing program information for the Multi-Unit Retrofit Program (MURB) involved reviewing documentation from sources such as the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) website, the Program Manual, and the Tracking Sheet.
3.4 RELATIONSHIP WITH PARTNER As part of the process evaluation, the DA involved in MURB was interviewed. The latter indicated strong satisfaction with the program and their relationship with ENSC's team. When asked about the transition fr...
AI summary The DA involved in the MURB program reports satisfaction with ENSC's team and the transition from pilot to full program, despite initial challenges with installation booking and overestimation of savings. The DA plans to implement a 'pulse' strategy to improve efficiency and customer experience. Complaints were noted, but represent a small percentage of installations. The DA recommends improvements such as LED upgrade packages and better engagement events.
3.5.1 Program Awareness Survey respondents, who were landlords or landlords' representatives, were asked how they found out about the program. The results indicate that participants found out about MURB in a number of ways. The landlord or...
AI summary Survey respondents, primarily landlords or their representatives, were asked how they learned about the MURB program. The most common method was through landlord or building management (24%), followed by ENSC initiatives such as direct contact, website, mailings, and newspaper advertising. Word of mouth and the Investment Property Owners Association were also mentioned as sources.
Table 6: Characteristics of Participation Participation 2012 Sample Size 37 Did not have products installed in common area 76% Did have products installed in common area 24% Saving on energy and energy costs was mentioned as the single mos...
AI summary Table 6 outlines participation characteristics in the MURB program in 2012, including sample size and reasons for participation. Energy savings was the primary motivation, with other reasons including program cost, pre-existing upgrade plans, and curiosity about energy efficiency. A minority noted that building management made the decision to participate.
Table 7: Reasons for Participating in Program Reasons for Participating Single Most Important Reason Other Reasons Sample Size 37 37 To save on energy/To save on energy costs 65% 16% Building management made decision 16% 3% Program was fre...
AI summary Table 7 outlines the primary reasons respondents participated in an energy efficiency program. The most significant reason was saving on energy costs (65%), followed by building management decisions (16%) and program being free (5%). Other reasons included environmental concerns (11%) and planning for energy efficiency upgrades.
Table 10: Recommended but not Installed Products that were Recommended but not Installed 2012 Sample Size 37 Yes 8% No 92%
AI summary Table 10 presents data on products that were recommended but not installed in 2012, with a sample size of 37. Only 8% of the products were installed, while 92% were not installed.
3.5.3 Program Influence The participants who had products installed in the common areas were asked to indicate the level of importance of various factors in influencing their decision whether to install energy-efficient products through th...
AI summary Participants in the program indicated that free installation was the most important factor in their decision to install energy-efficient products in common areas, with a mean score of 9.3. Program staff information and previous experience with similar programs were also important factors.
Table 11: Importance of Factors in Influencing Decision Importance of Factors in influencing Decision to Install Energy Efficient Products 2012 Sample Size 9 Mean (0=Not at all important, 10=Extremely important) The free installation of en...
AI summary Table 11 highlights the importance of factors influencing the decision to install energy-efficient products, with free installation being the most important factor. The mean scores indicate that information from program staff and previous experience with similar programs are also significant. Section 3.5.4 discusses the program's impact.
A small majority of participants have indicated increased interest in energy efficiency since participating in the program (63%). Almost one-half felt their knowledge of energy efficiency has improved as a result of participation (45%).
AI summary A majority of participants (63%) have shown increased interest in energy efficiency after joining the program, with nearly half (45%) reporting improved knowledge of energy efficiency as a result of their participation.
Table 12: Improvements since Participating in Program Improvements Since Participation Sample Size 2012 Improved Interest in energy efficiency 35 63% Knowledge of energy efficiency 33 45% \ Don't know removed from calculations
AI summary Table 12 shows improvements in energy efficiency interest and knowledge among participants, with 63% showing increased interest and 45% improved knowledge since joining the program.
\ \ Percentage of respondents who gave a rating of 5 or 4 on a scale where 5= 'Considerable improvement' and 1 = 'No improvement' As part of the program, most participants received information about energy efficiency or energy savings (70%...
AI summary The program has seen 70% of participants receive information about energy efficiency or energy savings, with a notable percentage of respondents indicating considerable improvement in their energy efficiency.
Table 13: Information Received about Energy Efficiency Information Received about Energy Efficiency 2012 Sample Size 37 Yes 70% No 24% Don't know/Don't recall 5% 3.5.5 Satisfaction with the Program
AI summary Table 13 presents survey data from 2012 regarding energy efficiency program participation, with 70% of respondents indicating they received information, 24% indicating they did not, and 5% unsure. Section 3.5.5 discusses satisfaction with the program.
The majority of participants were satisfied with the overall experience with MURB (89%).
AI summary The majority of participants (89%) were satisfied with their overall experience with the Multi-Unit Retrofit Program (MURB).
Those who were overall satisfied with MURB mentioned the following reasons for their satisfaction: satisfaction with the service (38%); lower energy bills (25%); saving energy (22%); satisfaction with the products and services offered thro...
AI summary Survey respondents satisfied with the Multi-Unit Retrofit Program (MURB) cited reasons such as satisfaction with service, lower energy bills, energy savings, and the free nature of the program. Other factors included positive relationships with evaluators and the information provided.
Table 15: Reasons for Satisfaction with Program Reasons for Satisfaction 2012 Sample Size 32 Good service 38% Lowered energy bill 25% Saves energy 22% Products/services offered through the program 16% Program was free 9% Liked the evaluato...
AI summary Table 15 outlines the reasons for satisfaction with a program among 32 respondents in 2012. The top reason was good service (38%), followed by lowered energy bills (25%) and energy savings (22%). Three of the four dissatisfied participants noted that installed products did not meet their needs.
There was a high level of satisfaction with various aspects of the program. Specifically, nine in ten participants were satisfied with the time required to complete the work (92%), and with the program representative overall (89%). Almost...
AI summary The program received high satisfaction rates from participants, with 92% satisfied with the time required to complete work, 89% with the program representative, 86% with installed energy conservation products, and 77% with information received about energy efficiency and savings.
Table 17: Satisfaction with Aspects of the Program Aspect of Program Sample Size 2012 Satisfied The time required to complete work 37 92% The program representative overall 37 89% The energy conservation products installed in units (apartm...
AI summary Table 17 shows high satisfaction levels among participants in the program, with 92% satisfied with the time required to complete work and 86% satisfied with the ease of participation. Ratings are based on a 5-point scale where 5 is 'very satisfied' and 1 is 'not at all satisfied'.
Table 20: Recommendations to Improve Program Recommendations to Improve Program 2012 Sample Size 37 Offer a wider variety of products 14% Offer more information on the products 11% Improve scheduling/Shorten wait for visit 5% Faster servic...
AI summary Table 20 presents recommendations for improving a program, with 59% of respondents indicating no recommendation. The most common suggestions include offering a wider variety of products (14%) and providing more information on products (11%). Other recommendations include improving scheduling, shortening wait times for visits, and faster on-site service.
4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of the program for 2012. Both energy and demand savings were examined in this evaluation. To do so, the following p...
AI summary The impact evaluation assesses the gross and net savings of the MURB program for 2012, analyzing unitary savings values, installation rates, and free-ridership. On-site visits and interviews were conducted to validate installation and savings calculations, focusing only on tenant units.
Table 21: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of CFL Category of CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 13W CFL 60 13 47 2.7 46.3 23W CFL 93.5 23 7...
AI summary Table 21 presents tracked unitary savings values for different categories of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), including old and new wattage, displaced wattage, hours of operation, and unitary savings value in kWh per year. The table includes data for various CFL types such as 13W, 23W, and dimmable CFLs.
LIGHT OUTPUT EQUIVALENCY INCANDESCENT BULBS (WATTS) MINIMUM Light Output (Lumens) COMMON ENERGY STAR QUALIFIED LIGHT BULBS (WATTS) 40 450 9 то 13 60 800 13 ₹0 15 75 1,100 18 To 25 100 1,600 23 то 30 150 2,600 30 TO 52 Figure 2: Light Outpu...
AI summary The analysis confirms that the light output equivalency table accurately estimates wattage displacement for CFLs installed through the program. On-site visits showed that 92% of participants confirmed 60-watt incandescent lamps were replaced by 13-watt CFLs, while 23-watt CFLs replaced a mix of 60-watt and 100-watt incandescent lamps.
Table 23: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of CFL Category of CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Comparison with Tracked Value 13W CFL 60 13...
AI summary Table 23 presents revised unitary savings values for different categories of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), showing the displaced wattage, hours of operation, and resulting energy savings in kWh per year. The table compares the old and new wattage for each category and highlights the unitary savings value and its comparison with tracked values.
Table 24: Tracked Unitary Savings Value for LED Nightlights Parameter Value Old Wattage (incandescent nightlight) 7 W New Wattage (LED nightlight) 0.3 W Average Displaced Wattage 6.7 W Operating Time 12 h/day Unitary Savings 29.3 kWh/year...
AI summary Table 24 provides data on the energy savings achieved by replacing incandescent nightlights with LED nightlights under various low-income and energy efficiency programs. The average displaced wattage is 6.7 W, leading to 29.3 kWh/year in unitary savings.
Table 25: Unitary Savings Values by Length of Insulated Pipe Length of Insulated Pipe Unitary Savings Value 3 feet 38 kWh/year 6 feet 76 kWh/year 9 feet 114 kWh/year 12 feet 152 kWh/year 15 feet 190 kWh/year While 3 feet seems to be a comm...
AI summary Table 25 provides unitary savings values for insulated pipe lengths ranging from 3 to 15 feet. The text notes that 6 to 15 feet is typical for residential insulation, though 3 feet is common for purchase. Savings calculations assume installation downstream of the hot water tank, where heat loss is greatest.
Table 26: Percentage of Products Installed and Installation Rate Category of Product Quantity Installed – From Paper Forms Quantity Installed – From On-Site Visits Percentage of Products Installed Installation Rate Error Margin18 Regular C...
AI summary Table 26 shows high installation rates for energy efficiency products, with most items remaining in place during evaluations. Only a few products were removed or burned out, but these were not counted in the installation rate. The data highlights the effectiveness of the program in maintaining installed products.
Table 27: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings by Product Category of Product 13-Watt CFL 23-Watt CFL 8-Watt Dimm. CFL 14-Watt Dimm. CFL 16-Watt Dimm. CFL LED Nightlight Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Shower head Pipe Insulation H...
AI summary Table 27 presents the evaluation results of energy and demand savings by product category, including the number of units installed, installation rates, unitary savings values, and total gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Table 28: Interactive Effects Calculation for Lighting Products Parameter % of Residences Interactive Effects 22 Electric heating with air conditioning 33% × 18% = 5.9% -54.4% Electric heating without air conditioning 33% × 82% = 27.1% -58...
AI summary Table 28 calculates the interactive effects of lighting products based on the percentage of residences with electric heating and air conditioning. The weighted interactive effects factor is -18.5%, and these effects occur only when products are installed inside the house. Regular CFLs can also be used for outdoor lighting in some cases.
Table 29: Interactive Effects Factors for Regular CFLs, Dimmable CFLs and LED Nightlights Category of Product % Indoor % Outdoor Interactive Effects Factor Regular CFL (13W and 23W) 94% 6% (94% × -18.5%) + (6% × 0%) = -17.4% Dimmable CFL (...
AI summary Table 29 presents interactive effects factors for different lighting products, showing how their energy use interacts with heating and cooling loads. For electrically heated homes, pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps have a -100% interactive effect during the heating period, while air-conditioned homes have a +100% effect during the cooling period. Lighting products like CFLs and LED nightlights have lower interactive effects, with a weighted average of -19.0% for Nova Scotia residences.
Table 30: Interactive Effects Factor for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Parameters % of Residences24 Interactive Effects During Heating Period Interactive Effects During Cooling Period Electric heating with air conditioning 33% ×...
AI summary Table 30 presents the Interactive Effects Factor for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps, showing the percentage of residences and effects during heating and cooling periods. The weighted interactive effects factor is -19.0% during the heating period and +3.1% during the cooling period.
Table 31: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product Category of Product 13-Watt CFL 23-Watt CFL 8-Watt Dimm. CFL 14-Watt Dimm. CFL 16-Watt Dimm. CFL LED Nightlight Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Shower head Pipe Insulation Hot...
AI summary Table 31 provides evaluation results of net energy and demand savings by product category, including metrics such as gross energy savings, interactive effects factor, and net energy savings at the meter and generator levels. It also includes demand savings and line loss factors for various products.
Table 32: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings Installed Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 3.185 GWh 3.185...
AI summary The table compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from ENSC's programs. Evaluated savings were slightly higher than tracked savings, with differences attributed to revised unitary savings values, interactive effects of regular CFLs, freeridership levels, and a revised line loss factor.
Program Manual - 6. Document major changes in the Document Revision section: In the Document Revision section, it is advisable to give a brief description of the major changes incorporated into the new version of the program manual. For ex...
AI summary The Program Manual outlines best practices for updating and standardizing program documentation. It emphasizes documenting major changes in the Document Revision section and maintaining consistency in program naming across all residential services to avoid confusion and enhance clarity for participants.
3 Participation questions (Free-ridership) This section is an interview with the on-site contact. S1. Thinking of your OVERALL experience with the Multi-Unit Residential Buildings program, including any services or energy efficient product...
AI summary This section of the document presents a survey conducted with participants of the Multi-Unit Residential Buildings program, focusing on their satisfaction and whether they would have installed energy-efficient lighting products without the program's involvement.
FR4M1. If Efficiency Nova Scotia had not installed [CFLs AND/OR LED NIGHTLIGHTS] in your unit for free, what is the likelihood that you would have paid to install these products in your unit? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 i...
AI summary The text presents a survey question regarding the likelihood of residents paying for energy-efficient lighting products if they had not been installed for free. It also includes a section about domestic hot water (DHW) related products and instructions for adapting survey questions based on installed products.
My first questions will be about the energy-efficient products related to domestic hot water heating, i.e. low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators, hot water tank wrap and/or pipe insulation that were installed in your unit through the progr...
AI summary The text contains interview questions aimed at understanding participants' behavior regarding the installation of energy-efficient domestic hot water heating products, specifically low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators, hot water tank wraps, and pipe insulation, in the context of the Multi-Unit Residential Buildings program.
2012 Evaluation Report FR3M2. In the absence of the program, when would you have installed the [LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS, FAUCET AERATORS, HOT WATER TANK WRAPS AND/OR PIPE INSULATION] that were installed through the program? - 1. Definitely to...
AI summary The text presents two survey questions from a 2012 evaluation report, asking respondents about their likelihood of installing energy-efficient products without the program and their willingness to pay for them. The questions aim to assess the program's impact on customer behavior.
VERIFICATION AND RECALL [V series] [ASK IF COMMON AREA=YES, IF NOT SKIP TO P SERIES] V3. I am going to read you a list of measures that, according to our records, were installed in the common area of your building by the program: [READ WHA...
AI summary The text outlines a verification process for installed energy efficiency measures in the common areas of a building, asking the respondent to confirm whether each listed measure was indeed installed.
NOTE FOR PROGRAMMER: DO NOT PUT THE NUMBER OF EACH MEASURE - a) CFL bulbs - b) LED bulbs - c) LED Exit Signs - d) Pipe insulation/Tank wraps - V4. [FOR EACH OF V3a to V3d = NO and RECORD = YES] Are you sure? According to our records someon...
AI summary The text outlines a verification process for the installation of energy efficiency measures, such as CFL bulbs, LED bulbs, LED exit signs, and pipe insulation/tank wraps, asking if the installation was confirmed in the records.
SATISFACTION WITH THE PROGRAM [S series] [ASK ALL RESPONDENTS] - S1. Thinking of your OVERALL experience with the Multi-Unit Residential Program, including any services or energy efficient products received and installed, how satisfied wer...
AI summary The text outlines a survey on satisfaction with the Multi-Unit Residential Program, asking respondents about their overall experience, reasons for satisfaction or dissatisfaction, and recommendations for improvement. It includes questions about energy efficiency measures, service quality, and program participation ease.
IMPACT OF THE PROGRAM [IM series] [ASK ALL RESPONDENTS] - IM1. Please indicate how, if at all, each of the following has changed since participating in the Multi-Unit Residential Program. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "no improvement...
AI summary The document asks respondents to evaluate the impact of the Multi-Unit Residential Program on their interest and knowledge of energy efficiency, using a scale from 1 to 5. Respondents are also given options for not applicable, don't know, or refusal.
BARRIERS TO ACTION [B series] - B1. [ASK IF YES TO AT LEAST ONE QUESTION FROM V3(a-d) or V4(a-d)] Were there any energy efficiency measures installed through the Multi-Unit Residential Program that you later chose to remove from your build...
AI summary The document outlines barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings (MURB) through the Multi-Unit Residential Program. It asks respondents whether they removed installed measures, why they removed them, and why they chose not to install recommended measures. Key concerns include lack of trust in professionals, perceived complexity, and skepticism about cost savings.
IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2ccM1 ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ: Would it have been within . . . - 1. Less than 6 months? - 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later? - 3. 1 to less than 2 years later? - 4. 2 to less than 3 years lat...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the timing of an action and customer willingness to pay for an energy efficiency measure, likely part of a regulatory proceeding involving Efficiency Nova Scotia.
FR2aM2 installed the [MEASURE 2] that was installed through the Program? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2bM2 installed standard equipment instead of energy-efficient [MEASURE 2]? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2cM2 installed the...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions related to the installation of energy-efficient measures through a program, focusing on whether the Multi-Unit Residential program influenced the timing of installations. Respondents are asked to indicate if they would have installed the same measures at a later date if the program had not been available.
IF RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTY SPECIFYING AN FR2ccM2 ANSWER IN MONTHS, READ: Would it have been within . . . - 1. Less than 6 months? - 2. 6 months to less than 1 year later? - 3. 1 to less than 2 years later? - 4. 2 to less than 3 years lat...
AI summary The text presents a set of questions related to the timing of an action and the willingness to pay for a specific energy efficiency measure. The questions are part of a survey or proceeding, likely related to customer behavior and program participation in energy efficiency initiatives.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The free installation of energy-efficient products offered by the program Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. Information or advice provided by program staff throughout the upgrade process Response...
AI summary The text presents a survey on customer experiences with energy efficiency programs, focusing on factors such as free installation of energy-efficient products, information provided by program staff, and previous experience with similar programs. It includes response categories such as 'Don't Know' and 'Refused'.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2012 impact evaluation of the electricity savings generated by Solar; Residential Solar and Commercial Solar being components of the Existing Houses and Prescriptive Rebate programs...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2012 electricity savings from Solar programs, including Residential Solar and Commercial Solar, which are part of the Existing Houses and Prescriptive Rebate programs. The evaluation was conducted through discussions with the Program Manager and five on-site visits.
2.2.3 On-Site Visits In November 2012, five on-site visits were conducted in residential and commercial facilities where solar equipment had been installed. The visits were conducted by Econoler's subcontractor, Equilibrium Engineering. Th...
AI summary In November 2012, five on-site visits were conducted by Econoler's subcontractor, Equilibrium Engineering, to residential and commercial facilities with installed solar equipment to ensure proper installation and function. The methodology is detailed in the Impact Evaluation section and Appendix II.
Sampling Methodology Five on-site visits were conducted under the 2012 evaluation of Solar. The sampling was based on program tracking sheets that contained the list of participants and information about the type of project implemented in...
AI summary The sampling methodology for the 2012 Solar evaluation involved five on-site visits based on program tracking sheets containing participant and project details. A total of 38 projects, including 37 residential and 1 commercial, had 76 solar collectors installed, with flat plate and evacuated tube systems being the primary types. Most installations were for domestic hot water heating.
4.2 GROSS SAVINGS The gross energy was computed based on a review of the unitary savings values and the total number of each type of equipment installed presented in the program tracking sheet.
AI summary The gross energy savings were calculated by reviewing unitary savings values and the total number of each type of equipment installed, as presented in the program tracking sheet.
Tracked Savings The tracking sheet provided for 2012 contained a total of 45 completed projects, with 44 for residential participants and 1 for commercial participants. These projects involved installations with electricity savings, and th...
AI summary The document discusses ENSC's method for calculating energy savings from residential and commercial solar hot water installations, referencing NRCan's performance directory and TRNSYS simulations for systems not included in the directory. Table 3 summarizes the unitary energy savings values used.
Energy Savings for Commercial Installations The only commercial participant had installed a combo system with many collectors before the RETScreen requirement was implemented. ENSC calculated its savings based on the model unitary savings,...
AI summary The commercial participant installed a combo system with many collectors prior to the RETScreen requirement. ENSC calculated savings using a conservative approach based on model unitary savings, the number of collectors, and a 25% reduction contingency. The Evaluator found this approach to be appropriate.
4.2.3 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for all sectors and categories of equipment installed through Solar are presented in [Table 4.](#page-37-2) They were calculated using the unitary savings values reviewed in this report....
AI summary The document presents revised gross energy savings from Solar programs, calculating total savings at the meter as 0.109 GWh and at the generator as 0.120 GWh, using line loss factors provided by Nova Scotia Power for residential and commercial sectors.
CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation revealed that Solar had generated net energy savings of 0.120 GWh at the generator. To calculate the net savings of Solar in 2012, Econoler not only reviewed the parameters used for estimating the unitary sav...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation found that Solar generated net energy savings of 0.120 GWh. Econoler validated these savings through RETScreen simulations and on-site visits to ensure accuracy and consistency with installation data.
2. System information Appliance Number of Flat Plate Collectors Number of Evacuated Tubes Collectors From Tracking Sheet On-Site Validation From Tracking Sheet On-Site Validation Domestic Hot Water heating (DHWH): Space Heating (SH): DHWH...
AI summary The section provides a table outlining the number of flat plate and evacuated tube collectors for various appliance types, including domestic hot water heating and space heating. It includes data from tracking sheets and on-site validations. The table is accompanied by a picture referenced as _page_42_Picture_2.jpeg.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2012 impact evaluation of the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE), which is a component of the Efficient Products program.
AI summary This report evaluates the 2012 impact of the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE), a part of the Efficient Products program, providing insights into its effectiveness and outcomes.
1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The LHLE is aimed at promoting the use of energy-efficient LED lights for holiday lighting. The LHLE is mainly a community outreach and awareness activity. Through local tree-lighting events held annually in November...
AI summary The LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) program, managed by ENSC, promotes energy-efficient LED lights by exchanging them for traditional holiday lights. The program has been active since 2005, and an impact evaluation for 2012 is being conducted, building on previous evaluations that showed significant energy savings.
2.2 GROSS SAVINGS The quantity of LED sets exchanged during the LHLE events was computed in a tracking sheet. Then, ENSC used an average unitary savings value to estimate the total energy and demand savings generated by the program.
AI summary The gross savings from the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) program were calculated using a tracking sheet and an average unitary savings value to estimate energy and demand savings.
2.2.1 Unitary Savings Value The average unitary savings value estimated for each set of LED lights exchanged is 35.2 kWh and the unitary peak demand is estimated at 176 W. These values have been used since 2007 to estimate the gross energy...
AI summary The average unitary savings value for LED lights exchanged in the LHLE program is 35.2 kWh, with a peak demand of 176 W. These values, used since 2007, were revised in the last evaluation and are based on assumptions outlined in a table.
Table 2: ENSC Unitary Savings Estimate for Each Set of LED Lights Exchanged Parameters Values Proportion of old large incandescent sets returned (25 lamps per set) 40% Proportion of old mini incandescent sets returned (100 lamps per set) 4...
AI summary Table 2 provides an estimate of energy savings from replacing old incandescent light sets with LED lights. It includes parameters such as the proportion of old sets returned, wattage of old sets, and the average old wattage across different set sizes.
Parameters Values Wattage of new LED sets (25 lamps per set) 0.08 W/lamp × 25 lamps/set = 2 W/set Average displaced wattage (per exchange) (90 W – 2 W) = 88 W Annual usage 5 h/day × 40 days/yr = 200 h/yr Number of new LED sets used to repl...
AI summary ENSC's LHLE program exchanges two sets of traditional incandescent lights for one set of LED lights, with a limit of one set per person. The program calculates energy savings based on the assumption that customers will replace both returned sets with new LED sets, resulting in calculated energy and peak demand savings.
Annual Usage For the hours of operation, as in the last evaluation report, Econoler considers the annual usage of 40 days used by ENSC to be acceptable. While BC Hydro 7 and the OPA rather assume an annual usage of 31 days, corresponding t...
AI summary Econoler adjusted the daily usage of LED holiday lighting from 5 to 5.8 hours per day based on ENSC survey results and accepted the 40-day annual usage assumption, aligning with studies from various jurisdictions, despite differing assumptions by BC Hydro and the OPA.
Unitary Savings Value The annual unitary savings value of 35.2 kWh per set of LED lights exchanged used by ENSC was revised to take into account the new daily usage of 5.8 hours per day. This revision resulted in an increased unitary savin...
AI summary The unitary savings value for LED light exchanges was revised from 35.2 kWh to 40.8 kWh, reflecting updated daily usage of 5.8 hours. This value was used to calculate gross energy savings for the LHLE program in 2012. The estimated unitary peak demand remained unchanged at 176 W.
2.2.2 Diversity Factor In the tracking sheet, ENSC estimated gross demand savings by using a diversity factor of 100 percent. As in the last evaluation, Econoler revised this assumption, considering that the probability that the LED holida...
AI summary The document discusses the estimation of gross demand savings using a diversity factor for LED holiday lights. ENSC initially used a 100% diversity factor, but Econoler revised this to 50% based on historical data showing that peak load occurs in December 50% of the time, aligning with the 2011 LHLE evaluation.
2.2.3 Total Gross Savings The gross savings of the LHLE for 2012 are presented in the table below. They were calculated using the unitary savings value validated during this evaluation and using the number of LED sets exchanged through the...
AI summary The gross savings from the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) in 2012 are reported as 0.396 GWh and 0.854 MW at the meter. Using a line loss factor of 1.100, the savings are estimated at 0.435 GWh and 0.939 MW at the generator level.
2.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS In a residence, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of the LHLE, replace...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of LED holiday lights on heating loads in residential settings. It explains that LED lights, which produce less heat than incandescent lights, can increase heating demand when used indoors during winter. The analysis includes data from a 2011 ENSC survey and assumptions made by Econoler regarding indoor and outdoor installations.
Table 5: Interactive Effects Factor for the LHLE Parameters % of Residences Interactive Effects Using electric heating – indoor seasonal LED lights 33% × 60% = 19.8% -100% Using electric heating – outdoor seasonal LED lights 33% × 40% = 13...
AI summary Table 5 presents the interactive effects factor for the LED Holiday Light Exchange (LHLE) program, showing how different installation locations of LED lights affect the program's impact. The weighted interactive effects factor is calculated as -19.8%. A survey of participants was conducted to determine where the LED lights were installed, but no conclusions could be drawn as half of the respondents selected both indoor and outdoor locations.
BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION 2012 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report March 7, 2013
AI summary This document presents the final report of the Business Energy Rebates Impact and Process Evaluation conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2012. It outlines the evaluation of business energy rebate programs and their impact on energy efficiency and process improvements.
Awareness Program awareness constitutes an important aspect of the program strategy in terms of keeping the number of participants on the rise and ensuring program continuity in the years to come. The evaluation has revealed that the main...
AI summary The evaluation highlights that ENSC's communication efforts, along with contractors and word of mouth, are key drivers of program awareness for the BER mail-in rebate approach. ENSC's intensified promotion in 2012 has been effective, and contractors play a significant role in program promotion and implementation.
Satisfaction and Motivations Satisfaction with the program has been strong among mail-in rebate participants and distributors. Actually, most of them expressed their satisfaction with the program overall and its various aspects. Considerin...
AI summary The document highlights high satisfaction among mail-in rebate participants and distributors with the program, citing an easy application process and the introduction of ENSC's new energy sheet to inform participants about expected savings. This initiative aims to enhance satisfaction and participation by addressing the motivation of energy savings and cost reduction.
3.2.1 Program Manual A program manual is an important tool for the entire program staff, as well as for the Evaluator. Indeed, it serves as a program memory and can be particularly useful in case of staff changes. The program manual is int...
AI summary The document discusses the evolution of the Program Manual for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). It highlights the adoption of a standardized template with 10 sections, improving upon the 2011 format and incorporating recommendations from the Evaluator.
3.2.2 Logic Model The logic model is a diagram representation of the program theory which describes 1) how the program is expected to work; and 2) how it contributes to the intended or observed outcomes. In 2012, ENSC made many changes to...
AI summary The logic model is a diagram representing the program theory, explaining how the program is expected to work and contribute to intended outcomes. ENSC updated its programs in 2012, and Econoler is assisting in aligning the logic models with current strategies and performance indicators. Finalized models will be included in program manuals soon.
3.2.4 Program Charts The program now has three process charts: one for instant rebate partners, one for mail-in rebate participants and one for the PM. These charts were recommended in the 2011 evaluation and are very informative for any n...
AI summary The program has three process charts for different participant types, recommended in the 2011 evaluation. Econoler suggests simplifying and widely distributing these charts to ensure clarity and maximum exposure, with version numbers and revision dates included.
3.2.5 Marketing and Outreach Activities ENSC is moving away from program-specific marketing to a more all-inclusive approach with increased focus on offering a full suite of energy-saving services and rebates for businesses. There has been...
AI summary ENSC is shifting to an all-inclusive marketing approach for businesses, focusing on energy-saving services and rebates. Marketing activities include trade shows, distributor branches, and mail-outs. The Evaluator recommends making performance indicators more quantitative and specific to improve the effectiveness of the marketing plan.
, the name of each distributor is registered once in the column where their product codes are listed. This way of inputting data makes it difficult to calculate sales and savings for each distributor. Technical data on products are sometim...
AI summary The document highlights issues with the format and content of monthly reporting sheets used for tracking instant rebate programs. It notes that distributor product codes are not systematically categorized, making it difficult to analyze sales and savings data. The Evaluator recommends consolidating information and improving the reporting sheets for better data tracking.
Table 5: Distributors' Satisfaction with Program Aspect of Program Mean (/10) Sample Size 10 Mean (1="Not at all Satisfied", 10="Very Satisfied") Program overall 8.3 Program support and communications 8.9 Rebate processing, tracking and re...
AI summary Table 5 presents distributors' satisfaction with a program, showing high scores for program support and communications but lower scores for rebate processing. Distributors noted that advertising improved sales, especially for LED lighting, but some felt that other BNI programs competed with their BER business by offering similar products and services.
3.5.1 Previous Program Participation Before participating in BER, three in ten participants had previously taken part in an ENSC program (30%). Among those who had previously participated in the programs, Smart Lighting Choices and Custom...
AI summary Before joining the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, 30% of participants had previously taken part in an Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) program. The most frequently mentioned previous programs were Smart Lighting Choices and Custom Retrofit, while participation in other programs was less common.
3.5.2 Program Awareness Participants found out about BER in a number of different ways. However, communication from ENSC was the primary source (41%), including contact with ENSC staff (20%), the ENSC website (14%), the newspapers (5%), EN...
AI summary Participants learned about the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program through various channels, with ENSC communication being the primary source. Word of mouth also played a significant role, suggesting high program satisfaction.
Table 7: Sources of Awareness Sources of Awareness 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 43 56 TOTAL ENSC SOURCES 41% ENSC staff 14% 20% ENSC website 26% 14% Newspaper 5% ENSC literature 26% 4% ENSC presentation 7% 2% Contractor or vendor 60% 36%...
AI summary Table 7 shows the sources of awareness for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) programs in 2011 and 2012. Contractor or vendor was the most common source of awareness in both years, followed by ENSC literature and business associates.
3.5.3 Motivations and Barriers to Participation The most important motivation for over one-half of those participating in BER was to save on energy costs (55%), while for two in ten the most important motivation was to take advantage of th...
AI summary Over half of participants in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program were motivated by energy cost savings, while 20% were motivated by incentives and rebates. These were also the top two motivations for participation.
Table 8: Motivations for Participating 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Motivations for Participating Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 43 43 56 56 Save on en...
AI summary Table 8 presents data on participants' motivations for joining energy programs in 2011 and 2012. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs and bills, followed by taking advantage of program incentives and rebates. Other motivations included improving lighting conditions, reducing maintenance costs, and environmental concerns.
The respondents were asked about their motivations for installing energy-efficient equipment. Across most of the measures implemented, the most important motivation was to save on energy costs (66% overall). This was generally consistent a...
AI summary Respondents cited saving on energy costs as the primary motivation for installing energy-efficient equipment, with 66% overall across the six measures considered.
Table 9: Motivations for Product Installation 2012 Motivations for Product Lighting New Motors or VSDs HVAC Equipment/ Upgrades Compressed Air Kitchen Agriculture All Measures Installation Most Imp. % 2nd Most Imp. % Most Imp. # 2nd Most I...
AI summary Table 9 outlines the motivations for product installation across various categories such as lighting, new motors, HVAC equipment, and others. The primary motivation is saving on energy costs, with additional factors including program incentives, building renovations, and reducing carbon footprint.
3.5.4 Energy Attitudes Virtually all the participants indicated that both reducing energy usage (100%) and managing energy costs (96%) is important for their organization, giving a rating of '5' or '4' (with '5' being "very important").
AI summary All participants emphasized the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs, with 100% rating reducing energy usage as very important and 96% rating managing energy costs as very important.
Table 12: Importance of Energy Management Importance of… 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 43 56 Reducing energy usage 98% 100% Managing energy costs 93% 96% Those giving a rating of 5 or 4 on a scale where 5= "Very important" and 1= "Not at a...
AI summary The survey results highlight a strong commitment to energy efficiency, with nearly all participants considering it very important. A high percentage indicated a likelihood of purchasing energy-efficient measures in the future, showing a positive trend towards energy management and participation in energy efficiency programs.
3.5.5 Program Influence Participants were asked to rate the importance of various factors in influencing their decision to implement energy-efficient measures. The ENSC rebates were the most important influence on their decision to impleme...
AI summary Participants rated the importance of factors influencing their decision to implement energy-efficient measures. ENSC rebates were the most important factor, followed by information from initial contact, program outreach, corporate policy, and industry standards.
Table 19: Recommendations to Improve Program Suggestions 2011 (%) 2012 (%) Sample Size 43 56 Provide more information/information sessions 14% 11% Better marketing/awareness 12% 11% Make forms more user-friendly 2% 9% Offer more measures r...
AI summary Table 19 presents recommendations to improve a program based on survey responses from 2011 and 2012. Key suggestions include providing more information, better marketing, user-friendly forms, and increased rebates. A majority of respondents indicated no recommendations or stated they did not know.
4.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation for mail-in rebate is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of this component of BER for 2012. Both energy and demand savings were considered in the evaluat...
AI summary The impact evaluation for the mail-in rebate component of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012 aimed to determine gross and net savings, considering energy and demand savings. The evaluation involved analyzing parameters such as savings methodology, equipment characteristics, and free-ridership, supported by tracking sheets, 50 on-site visits, and participant surveys.
4.2 GROSS SAVINGS For the year of 2012, the tracking sheet provided for the mail-in rebate contains a total of 295 projects completed by 175 participants and covering 7 different categories of measures. The gross savings estimations presen...
AI summary The 2012 gross savings evaluation for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program involved reviewing 295 projects across 7 categories using the BER – Measure Equations Tool and 50 on-site visits. Adjustments were made based on discrepancies between recorded and calculated savings, especially related to hours of operation and equipment specifications.
4.2.1 HVAC Measures A total of 22 visits were conducted at the sites where HVAC measures, mainly air and ground source heat pumps, were implemented. The on-site visits conducted for this category of measures allowed validating the number o...
AI summary This section discusses 22 on-site visits to validate HVAC measures, such as heat pumps, and highlights discrepancies in energy savings calculations due to incorrect data in participant worksheets. Corrections were necessary to ensure accurate tracking of savings.
4.2.2 Lighting Measures A total of 15 on-site visits were conducted to validate the parameters used in the savings calculations. One of those 15 projects had to be removed from the sample because the project had not been completed for spec...
AI summary A total of 15 on-site visits were conducted to validate energy savings calculations for lighting measures. One project was excluded due to external factors, and adjustments were made to savings calculations based on wattage, hours of operation, and installed units. Some participants overestimated or underestimated wattage values, affecting the accuracy of savings estimates.
4.2.3 Refrigeration Measures Based on the three on-site visits conducted for this category of measures, Econoler validated the proper installation and the characteristics of the equipment stated in the projects' documentation. It was found...
AI summary Econoler validated the proper installation of refrigeration measures in three projects but found a discrepancy in one case, leading to adjustments in energy and demand savings calculations. Corrections reduced energy savings by 1% and demand savings by 0.2%, with overall impacts of -0.19% and -0.05% respectively.
4.2.4 Motors and Drives Measures Seven on-site visits were conducted for motors and drives measures. These visits allowed validating the technical data used by ENSC in the energy and demand savings calculations, namely the efficiency of th...
AI summary Seven on-site visits were conducted to validate technical data for Motors and Drives measures, leading to adjustments in energy and demand savings calculations. Adjustments were made to motor efficiency data and annual operation hours. For drives, energy and demand savings were calculated using specific factors or VSD impact analysis. Overall, energy savings increased by 3.34%, while demand savings decreased by 2.87%.
4.2.6 Agricultural Measures One on-site visit was conducted in a facility where agricultural measures were implemented. This visit revealed that the energy savings had been underestimated as the default value used by ENSC for the operation...
AI summary An on-site visit revealed that energy savings from agricultural measures were underestimated due to incorrect operation hours used by ENSC. The savings were adjusted upward by 4,204 kWh (33.8%) with no change in demand savings. This adjustment is equivalent to a factor of 1.037.
4.2.7 Commercial Kitchen Measures For commercial kitchen measures, only one on-site visit was conducted. This visit revealed that the operation hours and the number of racks washed per day entered in the worksheet differed from what was ob...
AI summary An on-site visit for commercial kitchen measures revealed discrepancies between reported and actual operational data, leading to a 21.8% reduction in energy savings and a 0.36% increase in demand savings. The overall impact on total energy savings was minimal, with a 0.02% reduction.
4.2.8 Commercial Laundry Measures No commercial laundry projects were implemented under the mail-in rebate approach in 2012. However, the methodology used to calculate energy and demand savings for these measures was reviewed during this e...
AI summary No commercial laundry projects were implemented under the mail-in rebate approach in 2012. However, the methodology for calculating energy and demand savings for these measures was reviewed and found to be reliable, based on assumptions from the Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE).
4.2.9 Diversity Factor Based on the information received from ENSC, the peak period for electricity demand in Nova Scotia occurs in December, January and February between 7 a.m. and 12 p.m. as well as between 4 p.m. and 11 p.m. on a weekda...
AI summary The document discusses the diversity factor for electricity demand in Nova Scotia, noting that peak demand occurs in December, January, and February. Econoler used a 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. timeframe for peak load evaluation and determined diversity factors for various categories, using a weighted average for the commercial kitchen category due to a site not representing typical practices.
Table 22: Evaluation Results – Revised Gross Savings – Mail-In Rebate Category of Measure HVAC Lighting Refrigeration Motors and Drives Compressed Air Agricultural Kitchen Laundry Total Program Tracking Sheet Tracked Energy Savings (GWh) 3...
AI summary Table 22 presents the evaluation results for revised gross savings from a mail-in rebate program, detailing energy and demand savings across various categories such as HVAC, lighting, and refrigeration, along with adjustment ratios and line loss factors.
4.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling systems. For instance, replacement of old lightin...
AI summary Interactive effects refer to changes in energy consumption of heating and cooling systems due to energy efficiency measures, such as lighting upgrades. Factors accounting for these effects were applied to lighting measures using Efficiency Vermont's TRM, and were deemed appropriate by the Evaluator.
Table 23: Evaluation Results – Revised Net Savings – Mail-In Rebate Category of Measure HVAC Lighting Refrigeration Motors and Drives Compressed Air Agricultural Kitchen Laundry Total Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at Meter (G...
AI summary Table 23 presents evaluation results for revised net savings from a mail-in rebate program, detailing energy and demand savings across various categories such as HVAC, lighting, and refrigeration. It includes metrics like gross and net energy savings, non-technical generation ratios (NTGR), and line loss factors.
The table below presents comparisons between the energy and demand savings established by this evaluation for the mail-in rebate approach and those calculated in the 2012 tracking sheet. Table 24: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Saving...
AI summary The table compares energy and demand savings from the mail-in rebate approach evaluated in this document with those tracked in the 2012 tracking sheet. The evaluation results show energy savings fell short by 7% and demand savings by 3% compared to ENSC's tracked savings.
5.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The impact evaluation for instant rebate is aimed at determining the gross and net savings of this component of BER for 2012. Both energy and demand savings were considered in this evalua...
AI summary The impact evaluation for the instant rebate component of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012 aimed to determine gross and net savings, considering energy and demand savings. Econoler analyzed parameters such as savings calculation methodology, diversity factor, interactive effects, and free-ridership. Monthly reporting sheets and distributor interviews were used to calculate net savings, including the Non-Technical Generation Ratios (NTGR).
Tracked Savings The displaced wattage of HP-T8 and RW-T8 lamps has been established by ENSC using a 34-watt T12 lamp as the baseline and the real wattage value of the T8 lamps purchased. For the hours of operation, ENSC uses a value of 3,4...
AI summary The displaced wattage of HP-T8 and RW-T8 lamps is calculated by ENSC using a 34-watt T12 lamp as the baseline and the actual wattage of T8 lamps purchased. ENSC also uses 3,400 hours per year as the average operating hours for these lamps, based on data from BES and Custom Retrofit in 2010.
Table 25: Tracked Unitary Savings for T8 Lamps Type of T8 Lamps Displaced Wattage Hours of operation Unitary Savings HP-T8-32 W 34 W – 32 W = 2 W 6.8 kWh RW-T8-28 W 34 W – 28 W = 6 W 3,400 h/year 20.4 kWh RW-T8-25 W 34 W – 25 W = 9 W 30.6...
AI summary Table 25 outlines unitary savings for T8 lamps based on displaced wattage and hours of operation. The table includes specific calculations for different types of T8 lamps, such as HP-T8-32 W and RW-T8-28 W, with corresponding savings in kWh. The data provides insights into energy efficiency improvements from using more efficient lighting technologies.
Table 26: Displaced Wattages for Each Type of Ballast Used in the Tracking Sheet New Ballast and Lamp Systems Baseline Wattage New Wattage Lamp ΔW Ballast ΔW Proportion of T8 Lamps Average Ballast ΔW 1-lamp ballast with HP-T8-32 W lamp 43....
AI summary Table 26 presents displaced wattages for various ballast and lamp systems used in the tracking sheet. It includes baseline wattage, new wattage, and changes in wattage for lamps and ballasts, along with the proportion of T8 lamps sold through the SLC program in 2011.
By analyzing these calculations, the ballast factors used for the baseline and the new systems could be determined. For old magnetic ballasts, ballast factors ranging from 1.26 to 1.06 were used depending on the number of lamps, while a va...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of ballast factors for old magnetic and new high-performance ballasts, which are used to determine unitary savings values based on displaced wattages and annual hours of operation (3,400 hours per year).
Table 27: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for High-Performance Ballasts Type of Ballast Demand Savings (W) Hours of Operation (h/year) Energy Savings (kWh/year) 1-lamp ballast 13.52 3,400 45.968 2-lamp ballast 13.52 3,400 45.968 3-lamp ball...
AI summary Table 27 presents tracked unitary savings values for high-performance ballasts, showing demand savings, hours of operation, and energy savings for different types of ballasts. The table includes data for 1-lamp, 2-lamp, 3-lamp, and 4-lamp ballasts.
For this year's evaluation, Econoler revised these unitary savings values according to the proportion of each type of T8 lamp sold in 2012 through the BER Instant Rebate approach and the hours of operation used for T8 lamps.
AI summary Econoler revised unitary savings values for T8 lamps based on sales proportions through the BER Instant Rebate approach and operational hours in 2012.
Table 28: Revised Displaced Wattages for Each Type of Ballast New Ballast and Lamp Systems Baseline Wattage New Wattage Lamp ΔW Ballast ΔW Proportion of T8 Lamps Average Ballast ΔW 1-lamp ballast with HP-T8-32 W lamp 43.0 27.0 2.0 14.0 39....
AI summary Table 28 presents revised displaced wattages for different types of ballasts and lamp systems. The data includes baseline and new wattage values, lamp and ballast delta wattages, and the proportion of T8 lamps. Econoler used these values and annual hours of operation to revise unitary savings values for each ballast type.
Table 29: Revised Unitary Savings Values for High-Performance Ballasts Type of Ballast Demand Savings (W) Hours of operation (h/year) Energy Savings (kWh/year) 1-lamp ballast 13.40 3,400 45.56 2-lamp ballast 13.36 3,400 45.42 3-lamp ballas...
AI summary Table 29 presents revised unitary savings values for high-performance ballasts, detailing demand savings in watts, annual hours of operation, and energy savings in kilowatt-hours per year for 1-lamp to 4-lamp ballasts.
Table 31: Input Assumptions Used for EC Motors for Walk-In Cooler Evaporator Fans Parameter Value Standard Motor Power (1/20 hp 0.746 kW/hp / 26%) 0.142 kW EC Motor Power (1/20 hp 0.746 kW/hp / 66%) 0.056 kW Load Factor (L.F.) 0.9 Duty cyc...
AI summary Table 31 provides input assumptions for EC motors used in walk-in cooler evaporator fans, including motor power, load factor, duty cycle, and operating hours per year. The data is used for energy efficiency calculations and includes parameters such as compressor COP and degradation factors.
Baseline (Metal Halide Fixture) New Fixture (T5 high bay fixture) Displaced Lamp Wattage Ballast Wattage Lamp Wattage Ballast Wattage Wattage From ENSC's tracking sheet 250 W 25 W 4 54W = 216 W - 59 From OPA Report17 250 W 45 W 4 54W = 216...
AI summary The document compares the energy consumption of a baseline metal halide fixture with a new T5 high bay fixture, highlighting differences in lamp wattage, ballast wattage, and displaced wattage based on data from ENSC's tracking sheet and an OPA report.
Table 33: Diversity Factors for Instant Rebate Category of Measure 2012 Diversity Factor HVAC 100% Lighting 97% Motors and Drives 93% 5.2.10 Revised Gross Savings
AI summary Table 33 presents diversity factors for instant rebate measures in 2012, including HVAC at 100%, Lighting at 97%, and Motors and Drives at 93%. The section also references Revised Gross Savings under 5.2.10.
Table 34: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings for Products with Unitary Savings Values – Instant Rebate Product Category HP-T8- 32W RW-T8- 28W RW-T8- 25W 1-Lamp HP Ballasts 2-Lamp HP Ballasts 3-Lamp HP Ballasts 4-Lamp HP B...
AI summary Table 34 presents evaluation results for energy and demand savings from various products under the Instant Rebate program. It includes details on unitary savings, total gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, along with factors like line loss and diversity.
Table 35: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings for All Other Products – Instant Rebate Product Category T5 and T8 High Bay LED Lighting Systems LED Wall Pack and Garage LED Ref. Strip Lighting Other LEDs Induction High Bay...
AI summary Table 35 presents the evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings across various product categories under the Instant Rebate program. It includes metrics such as tracked energy and demand savings, adjustment ratios, line loss factors, and diversity factors for different lighting products and systems.
5.3 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling systems. In the case of the instant rebate, repla...
AI summary Interactive effects occur when energy efficiency measures, such as replacing standard lighting with energy-efficient alternatives, impact the heating and cooling loads of buildings. A -15.5% interactive effects factor is applied for lighting products sold through the instant rebate program, based on a 1992 study and data from on-site visits for another program.
Table 36: Interactive Effects Factor for Lighting Products Parameters Proportion of Buildings Interactive Effects19 Electric heating with air conditioning 17% -43.4% Electric heating without air conditioning 20% -49.0% No electric heating...
AI summary Table 36 presents the Interactive Effects Factor for various lighting products, showing how different heating and air conditioning configurations impact energy efficiency. The weighted interactive effects factor is -15.5%, and no interactive effects were considered for outdoor lighting products like LED wall packs.
Table 39: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings for Products with Unitary Savings Values – Instant Rebate Product HP-T8- 32W RW-T8- 28W RW-T8- 25W 1-Lamp HP Ballasts 2-Lamp HP Ballasts 3-Lamp HP Ballasts 4-Lamp HP Ballasts Lig...
AI summary Table 39 provides evaluation results for net energy and demand savings from various products under the Instant Rebate program. It includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, and line loss factors for different products like T8 lamps, ballasts, sensors, and motors.
Table 40: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings for All Other Products – Instant Rebate Product T5 and T8 High Bay LED Lighting Systems LED Wall Pack and Garage LED Ref. Strip Lighting Other LEDs Induction High Bay Induction W...
AI summary Table 40 provides evaluation results for net energy and demand savings across various lighting products under the Instant Rebate program. It includes metrics such as total gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, and line loss factor for different product categories.
The table below presents comparisons between the energy and demand savings established by this evaluation and those calculated in the 2012 tracking sheet. Table 41: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for Instant R...
AI summary The table compares energy and demand savings from the 2012 tracking sheet with evaluation results. It highlights differences in gross and net savings, including adjustments for line loss factors used by ENSC and Econoler.
Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings with Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 26.680 GWh 26.680 GWh 26.680 GWh 0.78 20.819 GWh Evaluation Results 26.804 GWh- 27.295 G...
AI summary The table presents energy and demand savings data from ENSC and evaluation results, including initial gross savings, adjusted gross savings, and net savings. It also includes the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR), which measures the efficiency of rebate programs by comparing net savings to installed gross savings.
High-performance or low wattage T8 lamps I have a few questions about your sales of high-performance and low (reduced) wattage T8 lamps that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. products. Our records indicate that your tota...
AI summary The text discusses questions regarding the sales of high-performance and low wattage T8 lamps, promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program, and explores whether the program's incentives significantly influenced sales figures in 2012 compared to previous years.
High-performance electronic ballasts I have a few questions about your sales of high-performance electronic ballasts for T8 lamps that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. Our records indicate that your total sales of high-...
AI summary The text asks about the sales of high-performance electronic ballasts for T8 lamps promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program, specifically inquiring if there is a significant difference (plus or minus 25%) between sales in 2012 (expected) and 2011.
E1. If the current trend is maintained, your total sales for high-performance ballasts in 2012 will be significantly lower/higher ( select the appropriate term ) than for the previous year. Is there any reason for this change? [PROBE: mark...
AI summary The text asks about potential changes in sales of high-performance ballasts in 2012, considering market trends and the impact of the Business Energy Rebates Program. It inquires whether sales would have been lower without the incentive provided by the program.
RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% E4. In 2012, how important would you say the incentive from the Business Energy Rebates Program was in customers' decision to purchase high-performance ballasts instead of standard electronic ballasts? Please give yo...
AI summary The text asks respondents to evaluate the importance of the Business Energy Rebates Program's incentive in influencing customer purchases of high-performance ballasts, the likelihood of continued purchases if the program ended, and whether the current incentive amount is appropriate.
1. Same [GO TO L4] 2. Lower [GO TO L2a] 98. (Don't know) [GO TO L4] 99. (Refused) [GO TO L4] [IF ANSWERED SAME] I just want to make sure I understand well. Without the program and its incentive, you would have sold the same number of LED l...
AI summary The text includes a question about the impact of a program and its incentive on the sale of LED lighting systems compared to standard lighting systems, with a reference to a tracking report methodology.
Satisfaction and recommendation S1. On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 = not at all satisfied and 10 = very satisfied), how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates program? Scale: S1a. If S1<8, would you car...
AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted to assess satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates program, covering aspects such as overall satisfaction, program support and communications, and rebate processing. It also mentions a separate study on new Codes and Standards in Nova Scotia.
APPENDIX III – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL 1. General Information Date of visit: Project Name: Project Tracking sheet #: Company Name: Contact Name: Address: Telephone: Type of facility: Retail: College/ University: Manufacturing/ Industria...
AI summary This document outlines an on-site visit protocol used for collecting general information and building heating/cooling system details during energy efficiency assessments. It includes fields for project tracking, company information, facility type, and heating system specifics.
Lighting Collect the information in the table below if lighting measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact declaration. Use additional sheets if required. The information collected will then be compared with the informati...
AI summary The text provides instructions for collecting information on installed lighting measures using on-site observation and contact declaration, which will be compared with data in a tracking sheet by Econoler.
Date of installation: Section 1 (Specify): Hours of use for equipment Section 2 (Specify): (Indicate the corresponding schedule number for each section where lighting Section 3 (Specify): measures were implemented): Section 4 (Specify): Se...
AI summary The text outlines a form or table for recording details related to the installation and usage of lighting and HVAC systems in different sections of a facility. It includes fields for specifying sections, hours of use, and whether cooling or heating systems are installed alongside lighting measures.
New equipment installed Baseline equipm ent Nur nber Wa attage Address Nui mber Wa ttage A . L. P.C L Туре Tracking Sheet On-Site validation Tracking Sheet On-Site validation Additional information Туре Tracking Sheet On-Site validation Tr...
AI summary The text presents a table with information about new equipment installed and baseline equipment, including details such as types of lighting (e.g., LED, T8, T12) and on-site validation. The table includes references to tracking sheets and additional information, but no specific claims or arguments are made.
Ne w equipm ent insta lled Baseline equipment Nur mber Wa attage Additional Nur mber Wa ttage Additional Туре Tracking Sheet On-Site validation Tracking Sheet On-Site validation information Туре Tracking Sheet On-Site validation Tracking S...
AI summary The document contains tables related to the installation of new equipment and baseline equipment, including details about types of lighting and their wattage. It includes tracking sheets and on-site validation information for various lighting fixtures such as LED parking lot lights, reduced wattage metal halide lamps, and T8 low-bay fixtures.
Date of installation: Motors Total number of motors installed: Motor 1 Motor 2 Motor 3 Manufacturer: Model number: Motor Size [hp]: NEMA Nominal Efficiency (nameplate): Hours of use (Indicate the corresponding schedule number): Approx. pro...
AI summary The document contains a table for recording information about installed motors, including details such as manufacturer, model number, efficiency, hours of use, and whether the motors are listed in the CEE Premium Efficiency Motors List. This appears to be part of an energy efficiency data collection process.
Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Total number of VSDs installed: VSD 1 VSD 2 VSD 3 Validate that the new VSDs do not replace old VSDs? Validate that the new VSDs are operational? If not, why and since when? VSDs are automatically controlled? (...
AI summary The text contains a table and form related to Variable Speed Drives (VSDs), asking for details such as the number of VSDs installed, their operational status, control type, motor horsepower, equipment type, usage hours, and load profiles. This information is likely used for energy efficiency assessments or regulatory reporting.
HVAC Collect the information in the table below if HVAC measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact declaration. Use additional sheets if required. The information collected will then be compared with the information in th...
AI summary The text provides a table for collecting information on HVAC installations, including details on pumps, heat sources, efficiency ratios, and system sizes. This data is to be compared with information in a tracking sheet by Econoler.
Number of tons per unit: Hours of use (Indicate the corresponding schedule number): Total cooling full load hours [hr/yr]: Total heating full load hours [hr/yr]: Validate if the HVAC systems are still operational: If no, why, and since whe...
AI summary The document contains a table with technical details related to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, including energy efficiency metrics and system specifications. It requests information about the operational status of HVAC systems and the type of heat pumps in use.
Kitchen Collect the information in the table below if commercial kitchen measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact declaration. Use additional sheets if required. The information collected will then be compared with the...
AI summary The text provides instructions for collecting information on commercial kitchen measures, to be compared with data in a tracking sheet by Econoler. It mentions the use of on-site observation and contact declaration, and references a table and image.
[INTRODUCTION] Hello, I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or your firm recently part...
AI summary CRA is conducting an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Business Energy Rebates Program and is seeking collaboration from participants to improve the program. The survey is expected to take about fifteen minutes.
Verification and Recall - V1. Our records indicate that your company or organization participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates Program. Is this correct? - 1. Yes (Go TO V3) - 2. No - V2. Is there someone else at your...
AI summary The document outlines a verification and recall process for determining participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates Program. It includes a series of questions to confirm participation and identify the most knowledgeable individual within the organization.
Name: Telephone #: program.) (Note: Thank and terminate call. Schedule interview with best contact regarding experience with the V5. According to our information, through its participation in the Business Energy Rebates Program, your compa...
AI summary The text is part of a survey related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking participants about their prior involvement in other Nova Scotia Power or Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. It includes questions about participation, program awareness, and specific rebate information.
IF FR2c > 5, then ask: FR1. Did your company or organization decide to implement the energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measure before participating in the Business Energy Rebates Program? 1. 2. 98. 99. Yes No (Don't know) (Refused) FR1a....
AI summary The text outlines a survey question structure used to assess whether companies or organizations implemented energy-efficient measures prior to participating in the Business Energy Rebates Program and how the absence of the program might have influenced their decisions.
FR2cc. DO NOT POSE FR2cc IF DON'T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your response to a previous question that if the Business Energy Rebates Program had not been available there was an [FR2c] in 10 likelihood that you would have i...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia. It asks respondents about the timing of equipment installation without the rebate and the likelihood of paying for energy-efficient measures without the rebate. The questions aim to assess the program's impact on customer behavior.
importance of each of the following in your decision to implement the energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measure you implemented through the Program. Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The Efficiency Nova Scotia rebate(s) Response 9...
AI summary The text presents a table that collects responses on the importance of various factors in implementing energy-efficient measures through a program. The responses are largely 'Don't Know' or 'Refused,' indicating a lack of engagement or knowledge from participants.
Barriers to Actions & Recommendations for Improvements [B Series] - B1. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in implementing the energy efficient measures for which you received a rebate from the Business Energy Rebates Pro...
AI summary The text outlines barriers and recommendations related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, including challenges such as concerns about bill savings, lack of information, and paperwork issues. It also asks for suggestions to improve the program, such as better marketing, more information, and improved forms.
APPENDIX VII - CALCULATION EXAMPLE This Appendix presents a sample worksheet showing step-by-step calculations that support results for one of the projects reviewed under the impact evaluation of the BER mail-in rebate. First, the equation...
AI summary This appendix provides a calculation example for a project reviewed under the BER mail-in rebate impact evaluation. It details the equations used for savings calculations, tracked savings by ENSC, and revised savings results based on on-site visits and documentation analysis. The example project involves replacing an electric baseboard heating system with heat pump units.
Savings Equations For each heat pump with a capacity of less than 65,000 Btu/hr., as is the case in this example, the savings were calculated using the following equations: $$Annual\ Demand\ Savings\ \left[\frac{kW}{year}\right] = Capacity...
AI summary The text outlines equations used to calculate annual demand and energy savings for heat pumps with a capacity of less than 65,000 Btu/hr., using metrics like HSPF and SEER, and full load hours for heating and cooling.
Tracked Savings Calculations For each heat pump unit of the selected project, ENSC proceeded to calculate energy and demand savings with the information available on the worksheet submitted by the participant, as well as on the heat pump s...
AI summary ENSC calculated energy and demand savings for heat pump units by adjusting HSPF values from region IV to region V using a factor of 1.15, as recommended by other organizations including Natural Resources Canada. Adjusted HSPF values were 7.91 and 8.00 for the two heat pumps studied.
Parameter Unit 1 Unit 2 Source Capacity (kBTU/h) 18 18 Participant worksheet HSPFBase (BTU/W·h) 3.416 3.416 Baseline for electric baseboard heating HSPFEE (BTU/W·h) 7.91 8.00 Product specifications SEERBase (BTU/W·h) 13 13 Standard efficie...
AI summary The document presents a table with parameters related to energy efficiency, including capacity, HSPF, SEER, full load hours, and tracked demand and energy savings. It also mentions 'Revised Savings Calculations' as a section heading, indicating a review or update to savings calculations.
Econoler based their savings review on the result of the on-site visit conducted at the site where the heat pumps were installed and on documentation analysis. During the on-site visit, the following elements were verified: occupancy sched...
AI summary Econoler conducted a savings review of a heat pump installation project, verifying on-site details such as occupancy schedules and unit specifications. Minor adjustments were made to HSPFBase and full load hours based on findings, with recommendations to improve estimation methods for full load hours.
PROGRAM OVERVIEW Custom Retrofit by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) provides large business, non-profit and institutional (BNI) customers with technical assistance, financial incentives and project financing to help reduce their...
AI summary Custom Retrofit by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) assists large business, non-profit, and institutional customers with energy efficiency projects through technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing. The program includes two components: one for retrofit projects and another for new construction or major renovations. In 2012, it aimed for 26.3 GWh in net electricity savings and 3.7 MW in demand savings.
The evaluation revealed that Custom Retrofit generated 28.941 GWh in net energy savings at the generator in 2012. As for electricity demand reduction, the program achieved 3.490 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2012. The f...
AI summary The evaluation found that the Custom Retrofit program achieved 28.941 GWh in net energy savings and 3.490 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2012. The table shows these savings along with the program's targets and savings tracked by ENSC for that year.
1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Custom Retrofit provides large business, non-profit and institutional (BNI) customers with technical assistance, financial incentives and project financing to...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's (ENSC) Custom Retrofit program assists BNI customers with technical assistance, financial incentives, and project financing to reduce electricity consumption and demand. The program includes two components: one for retrofit projects and another for new construction or major renovations, with separate evaluations conducted in 2012.
1.1 PROGRAM OVERVIEW Custom Retrofit provides eligible ENSC customers with incentives to help them conduct scoping and feasibility studies, implement technical changes in their facilities and carry out the required measurement and verifica...
AI summary The Custom Retrofit program provides incentives for ENSC customers to conduct feasibility studies, implement energy efficiency measures, and perform measurement and verification. It is designed for customized approaches and aims to achieve 26.3 GWh of electricity savings and 3.7 MW of demand savings by 2012, as outlined in the 2012 Demand Side Management Plan.
1.2 PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY As stated in its program manual, project sites eligible to participate in Custom Retrofit must be institutional, charitable, commercial or industrial facilities. Eligible accounts typically have a peak electricity d...
AI summary The Custom Retrofit program outlines eligibility criteria for institutional, charitable, commercial, and industrial facilities with a peak demand of 250 kW or higher. Projects must have electricity savings of more than 20 MWh per year and cannot include energy from non-utility sources. Eligible costs include engineering fees, equipment, installation, and HST. Free-ridership screening is part of the selection process.
3.4 CONSULTANT PERSPECTIVES Two consultants were interviewed as part of the Custom Retrofit evaluation to understand their involvement in the program, their participation process, as well as their perception of and satisfaction with the pr...
AI summary Two consultants were interviewed about their experience with the Custom Retrofit program. They found the participation process easy but noted issues with lighting forms and long wait times for incentives. While satisfied with marketing and staff relationships, opinions were split on overall satisfaction, with one consultant expressing concern about the impact of Business Energy Rebates (BER) on their business and suggesting financial support for fuel/gas/propane savings measures.
3.5.3 Motivations and Barriers to Participation When asked about their reasons for participating in the program, nearly all the participants mentioned a cost-related motivation, with over one-half stating they participated to save on energ...
AI summary Participants in the program were primarily motivated by cost savings (56%) and incentives (33%), with secondary motivations including environmental protection (15%) and improving lighting, comfort, or equipment performance (22%).
Table 7: Motivations for Participating 2011 2012 Motivations for Participating Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 27 27 27 27 Save on energy/ene...
AI summary Table 7 shows that the primary motivation for participating in energy efficiency programs in 2011 and 2012 was saving on energy costs, with incentives and environmental protection also being significant factors. Most participants did not report barriers, though M&V requirements were cited as a barrier by some.
3.5.4 Attitudes with Respect to Energy Management Participants were asked about the importance of energy management to their organization. All the 2012 participants indicated that it is important to reduce energy usage (100%) and the vast...
AI summary All 2012 participants emphasized the importance of energy management, with 100% indicating the need to reduce energy usage and 93% believing it is important to manage energy costs.
Table 9: Importance of Energy Management Aspect 2011 2012 Sample Size 27 27 Reducing energy usage 93% 100% Managing energy costs 100% 93% Those giving a rating of 5 or 4 on a scale with 5 indicating 'very important' and 1 'not at all impor...
AI summary Table 9 highlights the importance of energy management, showing that over 90% of respondents rated reducing energy usage and managing energy costs as very important in 2011 and 2012. Section 3.5.5 discusses organizational decision-making in the context of energy management.
3.5.6 Program Influence The incentives or on-bill financing was the most important factor influencing participants' decision to implement energy efficiency measures through the program (mean of 8.7 on an importance scale of 0 to 10). The f...
AI summary The most important factors influencing participants' decision to implement energy efficiency measures were incentives and on-bill financing, followed by funded scoping studies and recommendations from program staff. Corporate policy, industry standards, and technical assistance during project implementation were moderately important, while energy efficiency codes and previous program experience were less influential.
Table 11: Importance of Factors in Influencing Decision Importance of Factors in Influencing Decision to 20 11 20 12 Implement Energy Efficiency Measures Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0=Not at all important, 10=Extremely important) Program f...
AI summary Table 11 presents the importance of various factors influencing the decision to implement energy efficiency measures. Factors such as program financial incentives, technical assistance, and corporate policies are evaluated based on their mean importance scores across different sample sizes.
4.1 OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The Custom Retrofit impact evaluation aims at determining the gross and net savings for the year of 2012. Both energy and demand savings were considered in this evaluation. To do so, Eco...
AI summary The Custom Retrofit impact evaluation for 2012 determined gross and net energy and demand savings by analyzing project documents, on-site visits, and participant surveys. Adjustments were made using an overall adjustment factor and NTGR to account for free-ridership and internal spillover effects.
Ref.: 5790 24 IREP is a program targeting ice rinks in Nova Scotia. This program is overseen by the Recreation Facility Association of Nova Scotia (RFANS). The electric savings achieved under IREP are incentivized and claimed under ENSC's...
AI summary IREP is a program targeting ice rinks in Nova Scotia, overseen by the Recreation Facility Association of Nova Scotia (RFANS). Electric savings from IREP are incentivized under ENSC's Custom Retrofit, while non-electric savings are promoted at the provincial level. The program includes partially completed projects, with savings claimed annually based on project implementation status.
- > Project size: the respective size of the projects in terms of annual energy savings was considered as the most important criterion for project sampling. In fact, adjustments to the larger projects in terms of energy savings have a grea...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for sampling energy efficiency projects under the Custom Retrofit program. Factors considered include project size, type of energy efficiency measures, and participants' market sectors. Larger projects have a greater impact on overall savings, and the variety of measure types necessitates careful sampling to ensure accurate impact evaluation.
Building Lighting Retrofits For 2012, lighting retrofits were the energy efficiency measure that generated the bulk of the energy and demand savings. In fact, over 50 percent of the tracked energy savings for 2012 was contributed by projec...
AI summary In 2012, lighting retrofits were the primary energy efficiency measure, contributing over 50% of tracked energy savings. The Evaluator developed an on-site visit methodology to verify key factors impacting the gross savings estimates of lighting projects.
Unitary Wattage The unitary wattage of retrofitted lamps was the first factor considered by the Evaluator. For most lighting retrofit projects, ENSC had already developed a project impact calculation spreadsheet. This file listed and descr...
AI summary The Evaluator considered the unitary wattage of retrofitted lamps as the first factor in assessing lighting retrofit projects. ENSC used a project impact calculation spreadsheet to list old and new fixtures, which was validated on site. Ballast factors were also considered, with information collected from nameplates and manufacturer websites where necessary.
Installation Rate Where possible, the Evaluator conducted a survey of all new lighting fixtures. When the facility was too large and the fixtures too numerous, the Evaluator inspected a sample of fixtures assumed to be representative of th...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted surveys and inspections of lighting fixtures to estimate energy savings, using representative samples when full surveys were impractical. Discrepancies between reported and actual fixture counts could lead to additional audits for greater accuracy.
Hours of Operation To evaluate the hours of operation, the Evaluator first looked at the operating schedules of old and new lighting equipment that program participants had provided to ENSC. The Evaluator then confirmed these figures with...
AI summary The Evaluator assessed the hours of operation by reviewing lighting equipment schedules provided by program participants and confirming them during on-site visits. Adjustments made using metering data were also discussed with participants. Occupancy sensors and photocells were installed in some projects, and energy savings were calculated based on reduced operating hours.
Interactive Effects In its energy and demand savings calculations, ENSC took into account the potential effects of energy efficiency measures on electric space heating and/or electric space cooling systems. Where applicable, the Evaluator...
AI summary ENSC considered the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures on electric heating and cooling systems, confirming with participants about system types and conditions. Adjustments were made for special circumstances like space conditions and operation schedules.
Refrigeration and HVAC Projects In the 2012 sample, there were three HVAC projects and one refrigeration project. To evaluate the impact of these projects, Econoler first collected the key technical information from the feasibility study....
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation process for refrigeration and HVAC projects in the 2012 sample. Econoler collected technical information, verified installations, and assessed interactive effects on building heating and cooling needs to evaluate energy and demand savings.
Ice Rink Projects The 2012 Custom Retrofit sample included a total of 3 ice rink projects which were expected to generate electric savings in 2012. The implementation scheme of the IREP projects is slightly different from that of other Cus...
AI summary The 2012 Ice Rink Projects under the IREP program involved three ice rink projects aimed at generating electric savings through energy efficiency measures. Econoler customized on-site visit protocols and used a feasibility study to estimate savings for similar projects. Energy efficiency measures included lighting upgrades, low-e ceilings, heat recovery, and water treatment systems.
Other Energy Efficiency Projects For all the other energy efficiency projects supported by Custom Retrofit in 2012, the Evaluator reviewed the technical documentation and conducted on-site visits in order to verify the following parameters...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed technical documentation and conducted on-site visits for energy efficiency projects supported by Custom Retrofit in 2012 to verify equipment specifications, operating conditions, installation details, and other relevant parameters for calculating energy and demand savings.
4.2.2 Adjusted Gross Savings The 2012 gross energy and demand savings recorded in the ENSC tracking sheet were revised by incorporating the adjustments calculated by the Evaluator following a comparison of the project savings computed by E...
AI summary The 2012 gross energy and demand savings were revised by incorporating adjustments calculated by the Evaluator after comparing project savings from Econoler with those in the tracking sheet. The adjustment process was divided into three categories based on the type of energy efficiency measure implemented.
llation rate was very low in comparison with the number of fixtures claimed by the participants, most of these discrepancies were very small and called for only minimal adjustements to ENSC's savings. Reviewing the 31 project folders also...
AI summary The document discusses discrepancies in the energy savings reported by participants in lighting retrofit projects, noting that the adjustment needed was minimal. It also highlights an issue with the interactive effect calculation methodology used by ENSC, which employs specific coefficients to estimate heating impacts from lighting installations.
Adjustments to the other Custom Retrofit Projects The savings achieved by all the Custom Retrofit projects not classified as "Lighting Retrofit Only" or "Ice Rink" projects were fine-tuned using the same energy and demand savings adjustmen...
AI summary The document discusses adjustments made to energy and demand savings for Custom Retrofit projects in 2012, excluding Lighting Retrofit Only and Ice Rink projects. Econoler used weighted average adjustment factors and identified discrepancies in data collection and calculations, leading to a -44% adjustment for one project and an overall energy savings adjustment factor of 0.978. Lighting retrofit projects also had adjustments based on diversity factors and peak demand savings.
Calculation of Adjusted Gross Savings The following table shows the adjustment factors used by the Evaluator for the gross energy and demand savings calculations.
AI summary The text introduces a section discussing the calculation of adjusted gross savings, mentioning the use of adjustment factors by the Evaluator for energy and demand savings calculations.
The details of the energy and peak demand savings calculated for the three project types mentioned above are presented in the table below, which indicates the savings at both the meter and the generator. Savings at the generator level were...
AI summary The document presents energy and peak demand savings for three project types, calculated at both the meter and generator levels. Generator-level savings account for transmission and distribution losses using line loss factors provided by Nova Scotia Power. For Custom Retrofit projects in 2012, energy savings are estimated at 30.102 GWh at the meter and 31.960 GWh at the generator, with corresponding peak demand savings of 3.451 MW and 3.679 MW.
Table 17: Evaluation Results – Revised Savings in Tracking Sheet Program Path Lighting Retrofit Only Ice Rink Projects Other Energy Efficiency Projects Total for all Custom Retrofit Projects Number of Projects 91 18 46 155 Program Tracking...
AI summary Table 17 presents evaluation results for energy and demand savings from various energy efficiency programs. It includes data on the number of projects, tracked energy and demand savings, and adjusted savings values, providing a comprehensive overview of the impact of these initiatives.
Table 18: 2012 Net Demand and Energy Savings for Custom Retrofit Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) Evaluation Results – Gro...
AI summary Table 18 provides data on energy and demand savings for the Custom Retrofit program in 2012, including gross and net savings at both the meter and generator levels, along with the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR).
Table 19: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator 9 Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 32.536 GWh 31.885 GWh 0.93 29.653 GWh Evaluation Results 32.536...
AI summary The table compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from the Custom Retrofit program. Adjusted gross energy savings were slightly lower than tracked savings, with minor adjustments made by the Evaluator due to issues in interactive effect calculations and discrepancies in equipment counts. The overall adjustment factor for 2012 was very similar to the one used by ENSC for internal monitoring.
Verification and Recall [V Series] V1. The Custom program helps businesses implement electrical energy-saving projects. The Custom program offers technical assistance, financial incentives and financing to offset the cost of engineering st...
AI summary The document outlines a verification process for participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom Program, which provides technical assistance, financial incentives, and financing for energy-saving projects. It includes questions to confirm participation and identify the most knowledgeable individual.
Reasons for Participating [P Series] - P1. Did your company or organization participate in any other Nova Scotia Power or Efficiency Nova Scotia energy efficiency programs before participation in the Custom Program? - 1. Yes - 2. No (GO TO...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions related to participation in energy efficiency programs, specifically the Custom Program. It asks whether respondents participated in prior programs, which ones, and how they learned about the Custom Program. The options include various Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and other sources of information.
FR2a. the program? implemented exactly the same energy efficiency measures that you implemented through Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2b. installed standard equipment instead of energy-efficient equipment? Response 98 Don't Know 99 R...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the implementation of energy efficiency measures and financial incentives provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explores scenarios where these programs were not available and asks respondents to evaluate the likelihood of implementing similar measures without incentives.
[RECORD RESPONSE 0-10; 97=NON APPLICABLE; 98=DON'T KNOW; 99=REFUSED] - a. The program financial incentives and/or on-bill financing [STATE IF ASKED WHAT 'ON BILL FINANCING' IS: Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom program offers on-the-bill fin...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to energy efficiency programs, including on-bill financing, technical assistance, scoping and feasibility studies, corporate policies, industry standards, energy efficiency codes, and prior program experience.
ASK SO SERIES IF, IN DATABASE, FEASIBILITY STUDY=YES - SO1. Now I'd like you to think at the energy efficiency measures that were recommended in the Feasibility Study you conducted through the Custom program. Was there any energy efficienc...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to a feasibility study conducted through a custom program, specifically asking whether any recommended energy efficiency measures were not implemented. The questions cover various types of energy efficiency measures and include options for respondents to indicate if they know, don't know, or refuse to answer.
Barriers to Actions and Recommendations [B Series] B1. Did you face any challenge or barrier when implementing energy efficiency measures through the Custom Program? 1. Yes 2. No (SKIP TO B4) 98. (Don't know) (SKIP TO B4) 99. (Refused) (SK...
AI summary The document outlines a survey related to barriers faced in implementing energy efficiency measures through the Custom Program. It asks respondents about challenges, the most important barriers, and suggestions for improving the program. Key themes include energy efficiency, program evaluation, and stakeholder engagement.
PA1 Score: MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a ; FR2b) IF PRE-SCREENING: 0% FR1. Before participating in the program, did your company have plans to implement the specific energy efficiency measures that were implemented through the program? IF 1. Yes: U...
AI summary This section outlines a scoring methodology for evaluating energy efficiency programs. It asks whether companies had pre-existing plans to implement energy efficiency measures and whether they would have financed projects without financial incentives or onbill financing from ENSC.
PA3 Score: 100% - [FR4_P/(FR4_P+FR4_NP)] FR2c. If your company had not participated in the program, what is the likelihood that you would have implemented the energy efficiency measures but at a later date ? (Scale 0 to 10) IF FR2c > 5 : A...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring methodology for assessing the likelihood of implementing energy efficiency measures at a later date if a company had not participated in a program. It includes a scale and corresponding percentages based on the time delay.
APPENDIX VII – ALGORITHM FOR IMPACT CALCULATION This appendix presents a sample worksheet showing step-by-step calculations that have produced the results for one of the projects reviewed in the impact evaluation of Custom. Firstly, the eq...
AI summary This appendix provides a sample worksheet for calculating the impact of a project involving the replacement of five motors with more efficient models. It includes equations for savings calculations, tracked savings estimated by ENSC, and revised savings results based on on-site visits and documentation analysis.
Savings Equations For both the existing and new motors, the annual energy consumption is calculated. The annual energy savings (in kWh/year) are the result of subtracting the new motor consumption from the existing motor consumption. The s...
AI summary The text explains the methodology for calculating annual energy and demand savings for motor upgrades using formulas that consider factors such as nominal power, load factor, motor efficiency, and diversity factor. The approach is applied to both existing and new motors to determine energy and demand savings in kWh/year and kW, respectively.
Tracked Savings Calculation ENSC proceeded to calculate energy and demand savings with the information available in the documentation submitted by the participant, namely Project Development Agreement forms and calculation spreadsheets. Be...
AI summary ENSC calculated energy and demand savings using information provided by the participant, including Project Development Agreement forms and calculation spreadsheets.
Table 25: Values Used for Tracked Savings Calculation Parameter Existing New Quantity of motors 5 5 Nominal power (hp) 50 50 Annual operation hours (hrs/year) 8,672 8,672 Load factor 80% (not considered) 80% (not considered) Motor efficien...
AI summary The table shows energy savings calculations for motor efficiency improvements, with tracked energy savings of 120,918 kWh and no demand savings. The load factor of 80% was not used in the energy savings calculation, and demand savings were zero.
Revised Savings Calculation Econoler based its savings review on the results of the on-site visit conducted at the plant where the motors were installed, as well as on in-depth analysis of the technical documentation provided by ENSC. Duri...
AI summary Econoler revised the energy and demand savings calculation after verifying discrepancies in motor efficiency and load factor. The actual motor efficiency was found to be 93% instead of 95%, and the load factor of 80% was omitted from the initial calculation. The revised calculation included peak demand savings.
Table 26: Values Used for Revised Savings Calculation Parameter Existing New Quantity of motors 5 5 Nominal power (HP) 50 50 Annual operation hours (hr/year) 8,672 8,672 Load factor 80% 80% Motor efficiency 88.7% 93.0% Energy consumption (...
AI summary Table 26 compares existing and new values used in a revised savings calculation. The energy savings decreased due to corrected motor efficiency and actual load factor. Demand savings were calculated using a 100% diversity factor, as estimated by the Evaluator.
Final Adjustment Ratios As mentioned previously, the inclusion of the load factor into the energy consumption equation, as well as the correction of the new motor efficiency, had a significant impact on the energy savings for this project,...
AI summary The final adjustment ratios for a project were influenced by the inclusion of load factor and correction of new motor efficiency, resulting in an energy savings adjustment ratio of 0.559. No adjustment ratio was calculated for demand savings due to nil tracked demand savings, but the project's revised demand savings contributed to overall adjustment factors for other projects in the 2012 program impact evaluation.
On-Site Visit Protocol - IREP Projects 5. Lighting declaration. Collect the information in the table below if Lighting measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact Hours of use for lighting over ice surface: Is cooling inst...
AI summary The document outlines an on-site visit protocol for IREP projects, focusing on data collection related to lighting, heat exchangers, low emissivity ceilings, water treatment, and energy and demand savings adjustments. It provides structured tables for gathering specific technical and operational details.
1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Custom program is comprised of two components, with one targeting retrofit projects and the other targeting new construction or major renovations to the existing buildings. As part of the Custom program, Custom Ne...
AI summary The Custom program, managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), includes New Construction (NC) and Retrofit components. NC provides incentives for energy-efficient commercial and industrial buildings, using energy modeling and prescriptive rebates. The program aims for significant electricity and demand savings, with performance tracked under the 2012 Demand-Side Management Plan.
2.2.1 Analyzing Existing Program Information Analyzing program documentation was the first task in the evaluation for NC. At this stage, all of the available program information was reviewed. The Evaluator consulted the following sources:...
AI summary The first task in the evaluation for NC involved analyzing program documentation. The Evaluator reviewed information from the ENSC website, the Program Manual, and the Tracking Sheet to assess existing programs.
1 version indicated project status and whether verification was already performed by ENSC, while the 2012 tracking sheet does not provide such information and only includes projects completed in 2012. Like the 2011 version, the 2012 tracki...
AI summary The 2012 tracking sheet provides limited information on energy efficiency projects, including project identification, location, contact details, and expected finish year. It classifies projects into three categories: Energy Modelling, Feasibility Study, and Core Performance Guide. However, it lacks detailed data on how energy savings, peak demand, and financial incentives are calculated.
4.3 GROSS SAVINGS The 2012 sample included all the 10 new-construction buildings that participated in the program for this year. Nine of these projects were conducted under the NCEM path while only one project was undertaken through the CP...
AI summary Section 4.3 discusses the 2012 sample of new-construction buildings participating in a program, with nine projects under the NCEM path and one under the CPG path. It outlines the approach taken by the Evaluator to assess gross savings for each project based on its respective path.
4.3.1 NCEM Project Gross Savings Evaluation The gross savings estimation of NCEM projects was computed based on the information available in the program tracking sheet and project folders submitted by ENSC, as well as based on the data col...
AI summary The gross savings estimation for NCEM projects was based on data from ENSC submissions and on-site visits. Each project's customized approach required tailored analyses, and 9 on-site visits were conducted to verify installations and collect data for accurate savings calculations.
Verification of the Baseline When simulating energy efficiency measures installed in a new building, the building simulation software typically compares the proposed energy-efficient components with the equivalent standard practices in the...
AI summary The document discusses the verification of the baseline in energy efficiency evaluations, specifically focusing on the NCEM project. Econoler evaluated whether baseline assumptions used in building simulations were compliant with the MNECB 1997 and adjusted savings calculations accordingly, except in the case of a major retrofit project where the existing building was used as the baseline.
Nominal Specifications The first kind of on-site verification conducted was to determine whether the nominal specifications of the energy-efficient equipment installed in the new building corresponded to the feasibility study and/or buildi...
AI summary On-site verification was conducted to ensure that the nominal specifications of energy-efficient equipment in a new building matched the feasibility study and building simulation report. Discrepancies were addressed through consultation and adjustment factors were calculated for relevant modifications.
Installation Rate Where possible, the Evaluator conducted a survey on the new energy efficiency measures installed in the new construction (e.g. lighting unit count). Should the facility be too large and the number of energy efficiency mea...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted surveys and inspections of energy efficiency measures installed in new construction, prioritizing facilities with higher energy savings potential. Sampling was used when facilities were too large or had too many measures.
Diversity Factor During the on-site visits, the Evaluator consulted with the customer to verify the annual operating schedules of the new building and its new energy-efficient systems, such as heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVA...
AI summary During on-site visits, the Evaluator consulted with the customer to verify the annual operating schedules of the new building and its energy-efficient systems. Econoler estimated the diversity factor for calculating coincident peak demand savings, using the same 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm timeframe on nonholiday weekdays of December, January, or February as in the 2011 evaluation.
Review of the M&V For the validation of the energy savings claimed by each NCEM project, a comprehensive M&V process must be developed and carried out, either by each program participant or by ENSC (or one of its consultants). This M&V aim...
AI summary The document discusses the review of the Measurement and Verification (M&V) process for energy savings claimed by NCEM projects. It highlights the need for a comprehensive M&V process, conducted by ENSC or participants, and notes challenges in collecting energy bills for analysis due to the timing of project completion.
4.3.2 CPG Project Gross Savings Evaluation There were three steps involved in the evaluation of the major impacts of the only 2012 NC project conducted under the CPG path. As part of the NCEM project impact evaluation, the first step was f...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2012 CPG project involved three steps: remote data collection, on-site verification, and document analysis. However, the project faced challenges due to poor compliance understanding and missing documentation, leading to the discontinuation of the CPG approach in 2012. Econoler accepted the savings calculated by ENSC without adjustments.
Adjustments to NC Projects Conducted under the NCEM Approach Each NCEM project was given an adjustment factor established on the basis of the findings and observations from the project document analyses and on-site visits performed. Since...
AI summary The evaluation of NCEM projects in 2012 found that most projects were implemented as expected, but two projects (11% of expected savings) did not yield significant energy savings. One project was delayed due to incomplete construction, and another (1.5% of savings) had incomplete insulation work, making it ineligible.
CONCLUSION The program saw a total of 8 projects implemented for the year of 2012, which is similar to the number of projects in 2011 (9). This year's evaluation also revealed that NC generated net energy savings of 4.644 GWh at the genera...
AI summary In 2012, the program implemented 8 projects, achieving net energy savings of 4.644 GWh and net peak demand savings of 0.525 MW. The evaluation used on-site visits and participant interviews to calculate gross and net savings, considering free-ridership to establish an appropriate NTGR.
In-Depth Interviews In general, this in-depth questionnaire aims to discuss with the participants their decision to participate in the program. More specifically, it would help validate the influence of the New Construction Program on the...
AI summary This in-depth questionnaire seeks to understand participants' motivations for joining the New Construction Program and assess their satisfaction with the program's process and outcomes, particularly regarding the influence of the program on their decision to implement energy efficiency measures.
A3. Before participating in the New Construction Program, did your company or organisation plan to include, in the new building design, all the energy efficiency elements that were identified/recommended through the New Construction Progra...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions from a regulatory proceeding, focusing on participation in the New Construction Program and the implementation of energy efficiency measures. It asks respondents whether they planned to include recommended energy efficiency elements in their building designs and whether they would have taken similar actions without the program.
A7. As part of its New Construction Program, Efficiency Nova Scotia offers financial incentives to help the implementation of energy-saving projects. If your company or organisation had not received the financial incentives from Efficiency...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia's New Construction Program, asking respondents about their willingness to pay for energy-saving projects without financial incentives or financing. The questions aim to assess the impact of these programs on project implementation.
A10. Next, I'm going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your decision to implement the energy efficiency project you implemented through the program. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means " Not at a...
AI summary The text asks the respondent to rate the importance of factors that influenced their decision to implement an energy efficiency project through the program, using a scale from 0 to 10.
Factor Response (scale of 0 to 10) a. The program financial incentives and/or financing ResponseN/A b. The technical assistance provided by the program during the design development ResponseN/A c. The technical assistance offered by the pr...
AI summary The table outlines various factors related to a program's financial incentives, technical assistance, and corporate policies, but all responses are marked as N/A, indicating no information provided. The context includes references to Efficiency Nova Scotia and Nova Scotia Power.
Satisfaction Questions In general, how was your company or organization's experience with the New Construction Program? Please explain. offered to participants? Interaction and communication with staff: Availability of staff: Interaction a...
AI summary The text presents a table from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, asking participants about their experience with the New Construction Program, including aspects like interaction with staff, rebate amounts, challenges faced, and program support.
Please fill the table below for each cooling system at the site Description Cooling system 1 Cooling system 2 Cooling system 3 Cooling system 4 Energy source (electricity, natural gas, oil, etc.) Cooling system type (compressor, absorption...
AI summary The text provides a table template for documenting cooling systems at a site, including energy sources, system types, capacities, efficiency metrics, and energy usage data. It also includes sections for project details and design process strategies.
Small Business Energy Solutions SBES provides implementation of energy-efficient lighting and non-lighting measures to small businesses all across Nova Scotia. The eligible businesses pay as low as 20 percent of the installation and materi...
AI summary SBES provides energy-efficient lighting and non-lighting measures to small businesses in Nova Scotia, with eligible businesses paying as low as 20% of the installation costs. The program includes pilot initiatives such as 100% incentive for Very Small Businesses, free LED installation for retail facilities, and LED Blitz for replacing inefficient bulbs in malls and hotels.
Commercial Direct Install CDI provides direct installation of energy-efficient lighting and non-lighting products free of charge to small businesses in Nova Scotia. CDI features the following products: - > a variety of compact fluorescent...
AI summary The Commercial Direct Install (CDI) program provides free installation of energy-efficient products to small businesses in Nova Scotia. It includes lighting and non-lighting items such as LED exit signs, hot water tank wraps, and faucet aerators. The program aimed for significant electricity and demand savings in 2012.
Awareness The evaluation revealed that ENSC is successful at communicating about the program. Indeed, it was the main way participants learned about the program, although more likely for CDI participants (77 %) than for SBES participants (...
AI summary The evaluation found that ENSC effectively communicated about the program, with participants learning about it primarily through ENSC sources. CDI participants were more likely to learn about the program than SBES participants. Contractors and word of mouth also played a role, especially for SBES participants.
The evaluation revealed that BES had generated net energy savings of 30.152 GWh and demand savings of 5.244 MW at the generator in 2012.
AI summary The evaluation showed that the Business Energy Solutions (BES) program achieved significant energy and demand savings in 2012, with 30.152 GWh of net energy savings and 5.244 MW of demand savings at the generator level.
2.2.3 On-Site Visits On-site visits were conducted in October and November 2012 for both SBES and CDI by Equilibrium Engineering, one of Econoler's subcontractors. For SBES, 50 on-site visits were conducted to verify the installation of li...
AI summary On-site visits were conducted in 2012 by Equilibrium Engineering for SBES and CDI to verify the installation of energy-efficient products and collect technical data. These visits included metering hours of operation and collecting lamp wattage information to validate savings assumptions.
3.2.1 SBES The SBES tracking sheet presents information on the participating facilities and the achieved savings in one tab. Another tab was included to present detailed information on the projects implemented. In this tab, each installati...
AI summary The SBES tracking sheet provides detailed information on participating facilities, project implementations, participant contact details, and energy savings. It uses unique project identification numbers for tracking and includes data on costs, utility and customer contributions, and key parameters for validating energy savings calculations.
3.2.2 CDI The CDI tracking sheet presents information in one main sheet with fields on the participating facilities, products installed and achieved energy savings. Each project has a unique identification number, which facilitates partici...
AI summary The CDI tracking sheet provides clear and concise information on participating facilities, products installed, and energy savings. However, some fields such as contact information, rate codes, and business type were missing or incomplete, though improvements have been made with mandatory rate codes and diversified business type options.
3.3.1 Program Awareness ENSC is successfully communicating about the BES program in a variety of ways. Both SBES and CDI participants primarily found out about the program from various ENSC sources, although this was much more likely for C...
AI summary ENSC is effectively promoting the BES program through multiple channels, with CDI participants more likely to learn about it from ENSC sources, while SBES participants are more likely to discover it through word of mouth, indicating positive program perception.
Businesses and organizations chose to participate in the program for a number of reasons. Among these, saving on energy costs was the primary motivation for both SBES (66%) and CDI (49%) participants. For fewer participants, the primary re...
AI summary Participants in the SBES and CDI programs were primarily motivated by energy cost savings, with additional motivations including improved lighting and energy efficiency. Environmental protection was a less common motivator. The survey methodology was updated in 2011 to allow multiple responses for program awareness sources.
Table 5: Reasons for Participating 2012 SBES (%) CDI (%) Motivations Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 76 76 75 74 Save on energy costs/bills 6...
AI summary Table 5 presents data on the motivations for participating in the SBES and CDI programs. The primary motivation for SBES participants was saving on energy costs, while for CDI participants, it was also saving on energy costs. A significant percentage of CDI participants reported barriers to participation.
Table 6: Barriers to Program Participation 2011 2012 Any Barriers SBES (%) SBES (%) CDI (%) Sample Size 61 76 75 No 77% 97% 85% Yes 20% 3% 15% Don't know 3%
AI summary Table 6 outlines the barriers to program participation in 2011 and 2012, showing a decrease in reported barriers over time. The SBES and CDI programs are discussed, with a significant drop in the percentage of participants reporting barriers from 20% in 2011 to 3% in 2012 for the SBES program.
Only two SBES participants mentioned barriers to the program, which makes them very minimal impediments. These barriers included too much work required to obtain the funding. Barriers mentioned by CDI participants were mainly related to pr...
AI summary Only two SBES participants mentioned barriers to the program, which are considered minimal. The barriers included excessive work required to obtain funding. CDI participants mentioned barriers related to product installation issues, product unavailability, and energy-efficient equipment not meeting payback requirements.
Table 7: Specific Barriers to Program Participation 2012 SBES (#) CDI (#) Specific Barriers Most Important Barrier Second Most Important Barrier Most Important Barrier Second Most Important Barrier Sample Size 2 2 11 11 Too much work requi...
AI summary Table 7 outlines specific barriers to program participation in 2012, highlighting issues such as the complexity of obtaining funding, implementation challenges, and unavailability of energy-efficient measures. The data is based on responses from participants in the SBES and CDI programs.
\ \ Don't know/refused removed from calculations As for the reasons for dissatisfaction, two SBES participants indicated that they had expected more savings, while one mentioned that the products installed did not suit their needs. Meanwhi...
AI summary Some participants in the SBES and CDI programs expressed dissatisfaction, citing unmet expectations and unsuitable installed products. ENSC's 2013 quality assurance plan is expected to address these issues, though some participants also mentioned dissatisfaction with evaluators and the duration of energy evaluations.
Table 12: Recommendations for Improvements 2011 2012 Suggestions SBES (%) SBES (%) CDI (%) Sample Size 61 76 75 Increase advertising/marketing 18% 9% 4% Better communication/Hard to get in contact with 7% 7% 11% More information/Found proc...
AI summary Table 12 presents recommendations for improvements in energy efficiency programs between 2011 and 2012. The data shows a decline in the percentage of participants suggesting the need for increased advertising, better communication, and more information, while the percentage of respondents who did not know or refused to provide recommendations remained high.
Sampling Methodology A total of 50 on-site visits were conducted for the impact evaluation of SBES. The sampling was completed in September 2012 based on the participant list in the tracking sheet. At that time, the tracking sheet included...
AI summary A total of 50 on-site visits were conducted in September 2012 to evaluate the impact of the SBES program, using a tracking sheet with 746 completed projects. Projects were sorted by category of new product and total tracked energy savings to identify products generating more savings.
Table 13: Tracked Energy Savings for Each Category of New Product Installed 5 New Lighting Product Т8 Custom Lighting CFLs Exit Signs Metal Halide Т5 НО Halogen PAR HP Sodium Total Total Savings (MWh) 8,773 2,667 1,673 177 46 31 7 0 13,374...
AI summary Table 13 presents tracked energy savings from new lighting products installed, with T8 lamps, custom lighting, and CFLs contributing 98% of total savings. Businesses with these products were selected for on-site visits.
Unitary Wattage A review of the unitary wattage values used in the gross savings calculations was conducted for each category of product identified in the tracking sheet. Three types of replacement can be done through this program: - > lam...
AI summary The document discusses the validation of unitary wattage values used in energy savings calculations for lighting products. It highlights discrepancies in ballast factor considerations for different product types, especially in lamp-only replacements and hardwired CFLs, metal halide, and high pressure sodium fixtures. Adjustments were made for T8 fluorescents but not for other categories due to their minimal impact on overall savings.
Category of Product Number of Sites Visited Quantity Installed – From Tracking Sheet Percentage of Products Installed On-Site Installation Rate Error Margin6 T8 48 4,135 97% 97% 2% T5 1 57 100% 100% 0% CFL 32 635 90% 90% 7% Exit Sign 13 71...
AI summary Table 14 presents data on the installation rates and percentages of products installed on-site for various categories, including T8, T5, CFL, Exit Sign, and Other. The table highlights the number of sites visited, quantity installed, and error margins for each category.
4.2.2 Unitary Savings for Non-Lighting Measures Non-lighting measures were added to the program at the end of 2012. For this year, three heat pumps were implemented in participating facilities. For each different model, the savings were ca...
AI summary Non-lighting measures, specifically heat pumps, were added to the program in 2012. Annual energy and demand savings for each heat pump model are calculated using equations based on capacity, HSPF values, and full load hours.
Where: - > the capacity represents the real capacity of the heat pump installed; - > the Heating Seasonal Performance Factors (HSPF) of the base measure is estimated at 3.412, considering electric baseboard heating as the baseline; - > the...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating energy savings from heat pump installations, using the Business Energy Rebate (BER) approach. It outlines assumptions about heating performance factors and annual full load hours, while noting the need for future data on air conditioning usage to improve accuracy.
Table 15: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings – SBES Category of Product Fluores cent T8 Fluorescent CFL Exit Other SBES LED (Retail Heat Total , care g : , care a care Relamp Other T5 Sign Lighting Products Pilot) Pump Tr...
AI summary Table 15 presents the evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings under the Standard Building Efficiency Program (SBES). It details initial and calculated tracked savings, adjustments, and factors affecting energy and demand savings across various product categories, including fluorescent lighting, exit signs, and heat pumps.
Table 16: Interactive Effects Calculation for Indoor Lighting Products Parameters % of Facilities Interactive Effects9 Electric heating with air conditioning 17% -43.4% Electric heating without air conditioning 20% -49.0% No electric heati...
AI summary Table 16 presents interactive effects calculations for indoor lighting products based on heating and cooling consumption. Econoler calculated an average interactive effects factor of -15.3% after identifying 1% of lighting products installed outdoors, excluding LED exit signs. This factor is applied to all indoor lighting products except those solely installed inside.
Ref.: 5790 26 9 ADS ASSOCIÉS, "Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d'économies d'énergie – secteur commercial," report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992.
AI summary The document references a 1992 report by ADS ASSOCIÉS on the combined energy efficiency effects of energy-saving measures in the commercial sector, presented to Hydro-Québec.
Table 17: Average Interactive Effects Factors for Lighting Products Category of Product % Indoor % Outdoor Interactive Effects Factor Exit Signs 100% 0% (100% × -15.5%) + (0% × 0%) = -15.5% All Other Lighting Products 99% 1% (99% × -15.5%)...
AI summary The text discusses the need to add a specific field in the tracking sheet to identify lighting products installed indoors or outdoors, as well as in refrigerated spaces, to better evaluate the net savings of the program. The evaluation of lighting products is based on interactive effects factors.
4.4.2 Spillover The internal spillover effects of SBES were measured through the participant survey. Internal spillover occurs when participants purchase eligible energy-efficient lighting products following their previous participation in...
AI summary The internal spillover effects of the SBES program were measured through participant surveys, revealing a very low level of spillover. Only two participants out of 76 reported additional purchases of energy-efficient lighting products post-program, but the energy savings from these purchases were negligible compared to those achieved through the program itself.
Table 18: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product – SBES Category of Product Fluores cent T8 Fluorescent T5 CFL Exit Sign Other SBES Lighting LED (Retail Heat Pump Total Relamp Other 15 Sign Products Pilot) Pullip Ene...
AI summary Table 18 presents the evaluation results of net energy and demand savings by product under the Standard Building Efficiency Program (SBES). It includes data on energy and demand savings across various product categories, with adjustments for factors like Interactive Effects, NTGR, and Line Loss.
Table 19: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator – SBES Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Adjusted Savings with Gross Savings Interactive Effects NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 23.952 GWh...
AI summary Table 19 compares tracked and evaluated energy and demand savings from the Standard Building Efficiency Program (SBES). It shows discrepancies between tracked savings from ENSC and evaluation results, attributed to differences in line loss factors used in the tracking sheet and for the evaluation.
Table 20: Total Quantity Installed and Gross Energy Savings – From Tracking Sheet10 Product Category Quantity Installed Gross Energy Savings (Tracked) Quantity % kWh % CFL Products 16,904 59% 7,284,848 60% LED Lighting Products 9,522 33% 4...
AI summary The table presents the total quantity installed and gross energy savings for various energy-efficient products. It was decided to select businesses with at least CFL and LED products installed, and a random sampling approach was used after screening. Some products installed in small quantities were not included in the sample.
5.2 GROSS SAVINGS The quantities of products installed under CDI were computed in the tracking sheet. The CDI tracking sheet provided by ENSC for 2012 contained a total of 2,730 participating facilities11 where different eligible products...
AI summary The CDI tracking sheet for 2012 includes 2,730 participating facilities, with some also participating in MURB. Unitary savings values for products are based on past evaluations and studies, including the 2011 OPA report. Econoler reviewed these values using recent data and on-site visits.
Table 21: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of Regular CFL Category of Regular CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 13-Watt CFL 61.4 13 48.4 8....
AI summary Table 21 presents tracked unitary savings values for different categories of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) based on wattage and usage. The data comes from a 2011 evaluation report of the EP-DI program and was reviewed for this evaluation.
Hours of Operation To estimate the savings of the CFLs installed, ENSC uses hours of operation totalling 8.53 hours per day for 13-watt CFLs and 10.29 hours per day for 23-watt CFLs. These values are based on the hours declared by site con...
AI summary ENSC uses hours of operation data from the 2011 EP-DI program to estimate savings from CFL installations. Due to a lack of current data, Econoler applied a self-declaration ratio of 0.98 to adjust the hours of operation. ENSC plans to collect this data directly in 2013 using a unified tracking sheet for SBES and CDI.
Unitary Savings Calculation Using the following equation, Econoler calculated the unitary savings values for both types of regular CFL. Annual Unitary Savings = $$\frac{\Delta W \times \frac{h}{day} \times 365 \frac{day}{yr}}{1000 \frac{W}...
AI summary Econoler calculated the annual unitary savings for regular CFLs using a specific equation, and the results are presented in a table, with the last column indicating if the values differ from those in the tracking sheet.
Table 22: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of Regular CFL Category of Regular CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Comparison with Tracked Val...
AI summary Table 22 provides revised unitary savings values for two categories of regular compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), comparing old and new wattage, displaced wattage, hours of operation, unitary savings value, and a comparison with tracked values.
Table 23: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of Dimmable CFL Category of Dimmable CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 8-Watt Dimmable 33.5 8 25...
AI summary Table 23 presents tracked unitary savings values for different categories of dimmable compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), including old and new wattage, displaced wattage, hours of operation, and unitary savings value in kWh per year. The data comes from a 2011 evaluation report by the Energy Program - Demand Initiative (EP-DI).
Table 24: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of Dimmable CFL Category of Dimmable CFL Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Comparison with Tracked V...
AI summary Table 24 presents revised unitary savings values for different categories of dimmable compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), showing reductions in wattage and corresponding energy savings. The table includes comparisons with tracked values and references an ENERGY STAR product list from 2013.
Unitary Savings Calculation The following equation presents the unitary savings calculation for R30 CFLs. $$Annual\ Unitary\ Savings = \frac{(60\ W - 15\ W) \times 9.7\frac{h}{day} \times 365\frac{day}{yr}}{1000\ \frac{W}{kW}} = 159.3\ \fr...
AI summary The unitary savings calculation for R30 CFLs was updated by Econoler, changing the annual savings estimate from 119.2 kWh to 159.3 kWh, based on a formula that accounts for wattage reduction, daily usage, and annual conversion.
5.2.5 LED Lamps Different types of LED lamp are installed under CDI: - > 2.3-watt chandelier LED; - > 7-watt LED MR16; - > 14-watt LED PAR30; and - > 17-watt LED PAR38. 15 ENERGY STAR, "ENERGY STAR Qualified Lamps Product List", Posted on...
AI summary The document outlines the types of LED lamps installed under CDI, specifying wattage thresholds for chandelier, MR16, PAR30, and PAR38 lamps, and references an ENERGY STAR product list from 2013.
Table 25: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of LED lamp Category of LED Lamp Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 2.3-Watt Chandelier 34.5 2.3 32.2...
AI summary Table 25 provides tracked unitary savings values for different categories of LED lamps, showing the displaced wattage and energy savings per year. The data is sourced from the 2011 evaluation report of EP-DI and was reviewed for this evaluation.
Table 26: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each Category of LED Lamp Category of LED Lamp Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Comparison with Tracked Value 2.3...
AI summary Table 26 provides revised unitary savings values for different categories of LED lamps, including old and new wattage, displaced wattage, hours of operation, and unitary savings values compared to tracked values. The section '5.2.6 LED Exit Signs' introduces a new topic related to LED exit signs.
Table 28: Unitary Savings Values Calculations for Low-Flow Showerheads Parameter Value Old Flow-Rate 2.0 gpm New Flow-Rate 1.5 gpm Average DHW Usage 59.3 liters/shower/day Number of Days 365 days/year Unitary Savings 292 kWh/year The annua...
AI summary Table 28 presents unitary savings values for low-flow showerheads, showing an annual saving of 292 kWh per year. The savings depend on the facility type, with hotels being the primary installation location for these showerheads in 2012.
Revised Savings For this year's evaluation, Econoler conducted a literature review to validate the values obtained from the Veritec studies. The OPA Quasi-Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report19 presents savings assumptions for pre-...
AI summary Econoler conducted a literature review to validate savings values from Veritec studies, finding them more relevant than the OPA's assumptions due to on-site data from efficient dishwasher spray valves. Econoler retained the unitary savings value of 2,500 kWh per year.
Average energy savings according to the type of commercial facility For the installation of hot water tank wraps, the OPA reports different energy savings values according to the type of commercial facility. The table below presents the va...
AI summary The OPA reports varying energy savings from hot water tank wraps based on the type of commercial facility, with data presented in a table for installations through CDI.
Table 29: Annual Energy Savings Calculation per Liter of Tank Capacity Type of Commercial Facility Proportion in the Tracking Sheet Annual Savings per Liter of Tank Capacity (kWh/L) Retail 18% 1.70 Office 15% 1.74 18 Veritec Consulting Inc...
AI summary Table 29 presents annual energy savings per liter of tank capacity for different types of commercial facilities. Retail facilities account for 18% of the tracking sheet and save 1.70 kWh/L annually, while office facilities account for 15% and save 1.74 kWh/L annually. The data is sourced from a 2005 report by Veritec Consulting Inc. and a 2010 document from the Ontario Power Authority.
Other Average 49% 100% 1.77 1.77 School 1% 1.74 Restaurant 7% 2.10 Lodging 10% 1.74 In 2011, the average annual savings value was established at 1.80 kWh per liter of tank capacity. Based on the proportions of various types of commercial f...
AI summary The document discusses the revision of average annual savings value for hot water tank wraps from 1.80 kWh per liter in 2011 to 1.77 kWh per liter in 2012, based on the proportions of commercial facilities where the wraps were installed.
Unitary Savings Calculation Using the two parameters presented above, Econoler calculated a unitary savings value of 697 kWh per year for the hot water tank wraps installed through CDI: Unitary Savings = 1.77 $$\frac{kWh}{liter} \times 394...
AI summary Econoler calculated a unitary savings value of 697 kWh per year for hot water tank wraps installed through CDI using a formula that multiplies 1.77 kWh per liter by 394 liters.
5.2.12 Occupancy Sensors, Thermostats and Power Bars Occupancy sensors, programmable thermostats and power bars with integrated timers were part of the 2011 EP-DI program. Occupancy sensors and programmable thermostats were phased out of C...
AI summary Occupancy sensors, programmable thermostats, and power bars with integrated timers were included in the 2011 EP-DI program but were phased out of CDI in 2012 due to high installation costs and low demand. Savings from these products were calculated using unitary values from the 2011 EP-DI evaluation report.
Table 31: Unitary Savings Values for Occupancy Sensors, Thermostats and Power Bars Category of Product Unitary Savings Occupancy Sensor 391 kWh/year Programmable Thermostat 25.2 kWh/year Power Bar with Integrated Timer 53.1 kWh/year
AI summary Table 31 presents unitary savings values for energy-efficient products such as occupancy sensors, programmable thermostats, and power bars with integrated timers, providing quantitative data on their annual energy savings in kWh.
Table 32: Percentages of Products Installed and Installation Rate Category of Product Number of Sites Visited Quantity Installed – From Tracking Sheet Quantity Installed – From On-Site Visits Installation Rate Error Margin21 Regular CFL 27...
AI summary Table 32 presents the percentages of products installed and installation rates for various energy efficiency products. The installation rate was 100% across all categories, but due to variations and small sample sizes, the error margins do not justify using these percentages for gross savings calculations.
Table 33: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings – CDI (CFLs and LED Lamps) Category of Product 13-Watt CFL 23-Watt CFL Chandelier CFLs 8-Watt Dimm. CFL 14-Watt Dimm. CFL 16-Watt Dimm. CFL R30 CFL 2.3-Watt Chandeli er LED 7-W...
AI summary Table 33 provides evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings from the CDI program, which includes CFLs and LED lamps. It details the number of units installed, installation rates, energy savings, demand savings, and associated factors such as line loss. The data covers various product categories and their respective savings.
Table 34: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings – CDI (Other Products) Category of Product LED Exit Sign Faucet Aerator Low-Flow Shower- head Pre- Rinse Spray Valve Hot Water Tank Wrap Pipe Insulation Occupancy Sensor Progra...
AI summary Table 34 presents evaluation results for gross energy and demand savings from various energy efficiency products under the CDI (Other Products) category. It includes data on the number of units installed, energy savings, demand savings, and associated factors such as line loss. The table highlights the effectiveness of different products in reducing energy consumption.
5.4 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS Interactive effects occur when the installation of energy-efficient products has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling systems. As far as CDI is concerned, the replacement...
AI summary Interactive effects refer to changes in energy consumption caused by energy-efficient product installations, such as lighting and hot water tank wraps. The text discusses how these changes impact heating and cooling loads, using specific factors derived from studies and simulations conducted in Quebec. The weighted interactive effects factor for lighting products is -15.5%, and for hot water tank wraps, the factors are -100% for heating and +100% for cooling.
Table 37: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product – CDI (CFLs and LED Lamps) Category of Product 13-Watt CFL 23-Watt CFL Chandelier CFLs 8-Watt Dimm. CFL 14-Watt Dimm. CFL 16-Watt Dimm. CFL R30 CFL 2.3-Watt Chandelier...
AI summary Table 37 presents the evaluation results of net energy and demand savings by product for Commercial Demand Improvement (CDI), focusing on CFLs and LED lamps. It details gross and net energy and demand savings, including factors like Interactive Effects, NTGR, and Line Loss.
Table 38: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product – CDI (Other Products) Ca f Pr du te t g or y o o c L E D Ex i t S ig n Fa t Ae uc e to ra r Lo -F lo w w S ho w er - he d a Pr R in e- se Sp y Va ra lve Ho W t te r T...
AI summary Table 38 presents the evaluation results of net energy and demand savings by product for Commercial Demand Improvement (CDI) other products. The table includes various products and their corresponding energy savings in gigawatt-hours (GWh).
6.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION At the end of 2012, ENSC conducted the LED Blitz pilot. This pilot targeted malls and common areas in hotels and aimed to replace incandescent and halogen light bulbs with LEDs. Two diffe...
AI summary The LED Blitz pilot, conducted by ENSC in 2012, aimed to replace incandescent and halogen bulbs with LEDs in malls and hotel common areas. The impact evaluation assesses both gross and net energy and demand savings, using parameters like the interactive effects factor and demand-to-energy ratio.
Tracked Savings The following table describes how ENSC estimated the unitary savings value for each LED product installed through the LED Blitz initiative.
AI summary The document discusses how ENSC estimated the unitary savings value for each LED product installed through the LED Blitz initiative.
Table 40: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Each LED Product LED Product Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) 3-Watt Chandelier LED 28.85 3 25.85 12.8 121 3.5-Wa...
AI summary Table 40 lists tracked unitary savings values for various LED products, showing the energy savings achieved by replacing traditional lighting with LED alternatives. The table includes details such as old and new wattage, displaced wattage, hours of operation, and unitary savings values in kWh/year.
Table 41: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Each LED Product LED Product Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Hours of Operation (h/day) Unitary Savings Value (kWh/year) Comparison with Tracked Value 3-Watt Chandelier LED...
AI summary Table 41 presents revised unitary savings values for various LED products, comparing old and new wattages, displaced wattage, hours of operation, and unitary savings values. The table highlights differences between revised and tracked values, noting that discrepancies are due to the use of a rounded value for hours of operation.
6.2.2 Demand-to-Energy Ratio For the LED Blitz pilot, Econoler used the demand-to-energy ratio of 0.094 MW/GWh calculated for CDI. This ratio was obtained from the 2012 CDI targets by dividing the target demand savings by the target energy...
AI summary The document discusses the demand-to-energy ratio of 0.094 MW/GWh used in the LED Blitz pilot, derived from 2012 CDI targets by dividing demand savings by energy savings.
Table 42: Evaluation Results – Gross Energy and Demand Savings – LED Blitz Pilot Category of Product 3-Watt Chandelier LED 3.5-Watt LED MR16 5-Watt LED GU10 7-Watt LED PAR20 8-Watt LED A LAMP 13-Watt LED BR30 14-Watt LED PAR30 17-Watt LED...
AI summary Table 42 presents the evaluation results for the LED Blitz Pilot, detailing energy and demand savings across various LED products. The table includes data on the number of units installed, unitary savings, and total gross energy and demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
6.4 INTERACTIVE EFFECTS For the LED products installed through the LED Blitz pilot, Econoler applied the overall interactive effects factor of -15.5 percent, calculated for CDI.
AI summary The LED Blitz pilot applied an interactive effects factor of -15.5 percent for LED products, calculated for CDI, as determined by Econoler.
Table 43: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings by Product – LED Blitz Pilot Category of Product 3-Watt Chandelier LED 3.5-Watt LED MR16 5-Watt LED GU10 7-Watt LED PAR20 8-Watt LED A LAMP 13-Watt LED BR30 14-Watt LED PAR30 17-...
AI summary Table 43 presents the evaluation results of the LED Blitz Pilot, showing energy and demand savings by product category. The table includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, interactive effects factor, NTGR, and line loss factor for various LED products. The data indicates the overall impact of the pilot on energy and demand savings.
Tracking Sheet SBES 4. Specify the detailed characteristics of each lighting product: The current tracking sheet does not specify some of the characteristics of the old or new lighting products. In fact, such details as the number of lamps...
AI summary The tracking sheet SBES lacks detailed specifications for lighting products, such as the number of lamps per fixture, wattage, and ballast factors, which are all compressed into one field. This makes it difficult for evaluators to differentiate similar products and validate wattage values used in savings calculations. The Evaluator recommends adding separate fields for old and new lighting product characteristics.
Tracking Sheet CDI - 8. Develop a validation process for product removals: Some inconsistencies related to product removal were noted in the CDI tracking sheet by the Evaluator. In some cases, an installer had to come back to replace lamps...
AI summary The tracking sheet for the Commercial Demand Improvement (CDI) program has inconsistencies in product removals and lacks direct energy savings calculations. Econoler recommends developing a validation process for product removals and adding fields to the tracking sheet to monitor energy savings and parameters used in calculations.
2011 Evaluation Report Gross Savings SBES 13. If heat pump measures gain in popularity in the future, collect information on the use of air-conditioning in the facility before the installation of the heat pump and calculate savings on cool...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report outlines recommendations for improving the tracking and calculation of energy savings. It suggests collecting data on air-conditioning usage before heat pump installations, tracking hours of operation for CDI-installed products, and recording DHW tank sizes for facilities with hot water tank wraps.
Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report
AI summary This document is the 2011 Evaluation Report for the Small Business Energy Solutions Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It provides an assessment of the program's performance and outcomes during that year.
INTRODUCTION Hello, I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or your firm recently partic...
AI summary CRA is evaluating energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and is seeking input from participants of the Business Energy Solutions Program to improve the program.
1. Yes [CONTINUE] 2. No [PROMPT: "Is there someone else in your organization who would know about having participated in the Business Energy Solutions Program?"] Yes [ASK TO SPEAK TO THEM AND REPEAT INTRODUCTION] No [THANK & TERMINATE] 3....
AI summary This text outlines a survey process related to participation in the Business Energy Solutions Program, which includes the Small Business Energy Solutions and Commercial Direct Install components. The Small Business Energy Solutions component offers up to an 80% incentive.
Verification and Recall (Series V) - V1. Our records indicate that your company or organization participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Solutions Program. Is this correct? - 1. Yes (GO TO V2) - 2. No (GO TO V1A) - 3. (Don'...
AI summary This section of the document is part of a verification and recall process related to participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Solutions Program. It asks respondents to confirm their participation and identify which component of the program they participated in during 2012.
Satisfaction (Series S) - S1. Thinking of your OVERALL experience with the [Small Business Energy Solutions/Commercial Direct Install] program, including any services or energy efficient products received and installed, how satisfied were...
AI summary The document contains survey questions related to customer satisfaction with the Small Business Energy Solutions and Commercial Direct Install programs. It asks participants to rate their overall satisfaction and identify the primary reasons for dissatisfaction, such as delays, product suitability, and incentive levels.
Barriers (Series B) - B1. Were there any barriers that your company or organization faced in implementing the energy efficiency measures provided through the [Small Business Energy Solutions/Commercial Direct Install] program? - 1. Yes - 2...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions about barriers faced by companies or organizations in implementing energy efficiency measures through the Small Business Energy Solutions/Commercial Direct Install program. It asks whether barriers were encountered and identifies the most and second most important barriers.
Free-Ridership SBES (Series FRS) [ASK THIS SECTION TO RESPONDENTS FROM THE SBES COMPONENT ONLY] The following questions will be about the lighting measures, such as T8 fluorescent lamps, compact fluorescent light bulbs and L-E-D lamps that...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding focuses on assessing free-ridership in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program by asking participants whether they had plans to install energy-efficient lighting before joining the program and what actions they would have taken in its absence.
FRS2a installed exactly the same energy-efficient lighting products that you installed through the Program? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FRS2b installed standard lighting products instead of energy-efficient lighting products? Respons...
AI summary The text references questions about the installation of energy-efficient lighting products through the FRS2a and FRS2b programs, with responses categorized as 'Don't Know' or 'Refused'.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. Efficiency Nova Scotia Financial Assistance Response98 Don't Know99 Refused b. Information received during the initial contact by the program representative. Response98 Don't Know99 Refused c. Effic...
AI summary The document outlines various factors related to energy efficiency programs, including financial assistance, industry practices, and previous program participation. Responses to these factors are largely marked as 'Don't Know' or 'Refused.'
IME THROUGH THE SEQUENCE, START HERE FOR SECOND AND SUBSEQUENT SEQUENCES. START SECOND/SUBSEQUENT SEQUENCES BY SAYING: "AND NEXT. In the absence of the Commercial Direct Install program, would you have . . . [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE – POSE F...
AI summary The text outlines a sequence of questions used in a regulatory proceeding to assess the impact of the Commercial Direct Install program and Efficiency Nova Scotia's role in the installation of energy-efficient measures. It includes response options and follow-up questions to determine the likelihood of installation without the program.
Factor Responses (READ AND RANDOMIZE) a. The free installation of energy-efficient products offered by the program Response98 Don't Know99 Refused b. Information or advice provided by program staff throughout the upgrade process Response98...
AI summary The text discusses responses to factors related to energy efficiency programs, including free installation of products, information provided by program staff, and previous experience with similar programs. The responses include 'Don't Know' and 'Refused'.
Firmographics (Series F) - F1. What is the main activity of the facility where the energy efficiency improvements were implemented under the program? [DO NOT READ—BUT CONFIRM WITH RESPONDENT THAT THE CATEGORY YOU CHOOSE IS CORRECT] - 1. (E...
AI summary The text presents a question regarding the main activity of a facility where energy efficiency improvements were implemented under a program. It provides a list of potential categories, including education, food sales, healthcare, lodging, and others.
SBES Component FR1. Before participating in SBES, did your company have plans to install the specific energy-efficient lighting products that were installed through SBES? IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a IF 2 OR 9 : FR1 = 0% FR1a. I just want to make s...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions and formulas used to assess free-ridership in the SBES program, focusing on whether companies would have installed energy-efficient lighting products without the program's incentives and the timing of such installations. It includes scoring mechanisms and consistency tests to evaluate the impact of the program.
PA1 Score: MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a; FR2b) FR1. Did your company have any specific plans to install the energy-efficient products in your facility prior to talking with anyone about CDI? IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a IF 2 OR 9: FR1 = 0% FR1a. I just wan...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring process for a company's participation in an energy efficiency program, focusing on whether the company had pre-existing plans to install energy-efficient products and whether it would have paid for them if not for the program.
PA3 Score: (10 - FR4_P) x 10% FR2c. If your company had not participated in CDI, what is the likelihood that you would have installed the energy-efficiency products but at a later date? (Scale 0 to 10) IF FR2c > 5 : ASK FR2cc Otherwise: PA...
AI summary This section of the proceeding asks companies to assess the likelihood and timing of energy-efficiency product installation if they had not participated in the CDI program, with specific scoring and response options provided.
Savings Equations For each T8 fluorescent lighting measure, the savings were calculated using the following equations: $$Annual \ Demand \ Savings \ \left[\frac{W}{year}\right] = (Qty \times Watt)_{Baseline} - (Qty \times Watt)_{New}$$ $$A...
AI summary The document provides equations for calculating annual demand and energy savings for T8 fluorescent lighting measures. The equations compare baseline and new quantities and wattages to determine savings in watts per year and kilowatt-hours per year.
Where: - > Qty represents the quantity of lighting fixtures installed; - > Baseline and new Watt represent the unitary wattage values, which include the number of lamps per fixture, the wattage of the lamps and the ballast factor; - > Hrs...
AI summary The text defines key terms used in the calculation of energy savings from lighting fixture installations, including quantity, wattage values, and annual hours of operation.
Tracked Savings Calculations For each T8 fluorescent lighting measure, when only the lamp was replaced ("Relamp" installation type), ENSC proceeded to calculate energy and demand savings with the information available in the tracking sheet...
AI summary ENSC calculated energy and demand savings for T8 fluorescent lighting measures where only the lamp was replaced. The calculation used the quantity installed, unitary wattage value, and hours of operation, without considering a ballast factor for the new lamp but including it for the old lamp.
Econoler revised the savings after reviewing the parameters used in the savings calculations and results of the on-site metering study. As for the unitary wattage value, Econoler noticed that no ballast factor was considered for the newly...
AI summary Econoler revised energy savings calculations following a review of parameters and an on-site metering study. Adjustments included correcting the unitary wattage value by excluding the ballast factor for the new lamp and using only the lamp wattage of the old lamp. An average self-declaration ratio of 0.98 was applied to T8 fluorescent lighting measures based on metering study results.
Based on these adjustments, Econoler revised the parameters used in the tracking sheet to calculate savings for the same specific case of a "T8-2LAMP-4FOOT-32W" replacing a "T8-2LAMP-4FOOT-28W". Parameter Value Source Baseline Measure "T12...
AI summary Econoler revised parameters in a tracking sheet to calculate energy and demand savings for replacing a T8-2LAMP-4FOOT-32W with a T8-2LAMP-4FOOT-28W, adjusting wattage and hours of operation based on specific factors.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW CODES AND STANDARDS IN NOVA SCOTIA IMPACT EVALUATION 2012 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report March 5, 2013
AI summary This document is a final report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the impact evaluation of new codes and standards introduced in Nova Scotia in 2012. The report was published on March 5, 2013.
ACRONYMS AC Alternating Current BR Bulged Reflector CEM Consumer Electronics Market C&S Codes & Standards DC Direct Current DVR Digital Video Recorder EEMAC Electrical Equipment Manufacturers Association of Canada EER Energy Efficiency Rat...
AI summary The document provides a list of acronyms and their full forms, including terms related to energy efficiency, electrical equipment, and standards. It includes references to organizations and regulatory bodies involved in energy and consumer electronics.
Table 1: Products Targeted by Amendment 11 4 Products Existing MEPS prior to Amendment 11 Reference code Electric motors Yes CAN/CSA 390-10 Residential gas boilers Yes CSA P.2-07 Residential oil boilers Yes CSA P.2-07 Dry-type transformers...
AI summary Table 1 lists products targeted by Amendment 11, including existing and new Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) in Canada. The table includes products like electric motors, gas boilers, and transformers, along with their reference codes. The text mentions Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) assessing the impact of new C&S standards introduced in 2012 on Nova Scotia's energy usage.
Table 2: 2012 Evaluated Energy and Demand Savings at the Generator Products Estimated Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Average Non Compliance rate Total Energy Savings at Generator Total Demand Savings at Generator Electric motors 3,338 61...
AI summary Table 2 presents the 2012 evaluated energy and demand savings at the generator for various products in Nova Scotia. The table includes estimated shipments, non-compliance rates, and corresponding energy and demand savings for items like electric motors, lamps, and power supplies.
2.3.3 In-Depth Interviews with Distributors and Manufacturers From November 12 to December 21, 34 in-depth interviews were conducted with distributors (15) and manufacturers (19) of products targeted by the eight standards evaluated. When...
AI summary In-depth interviews with 34 distributors and manufacturers were conducted from November 12 to December 21 to estimate market sizes for products targeted by eight standards. The interviews aimed to validate market size estimates and assess the impact of the standards on the market.
2.3.4 Analysis Once all interviews were completed, the original estimates were adjusted based on comments made by the distributors and manufacturers interviewed. Once the market size for each product and the portion of the market impacted...
AI summary After interviews with distributors and manufacturers, original estimates were adjusted to determine the market impact of new standards in Nova Scotia. Market size and the portion impacted by standards were used to estimate savings attributable to each standard using unitary savings from secondary data research.
New Regulation NRCan modified three elements regarding the MEPS for electric motors with the introduction of Amendment 11. The new regulations: - > Increase the stringency of current motor efficiency requirements for 1 to 200 HP (0.75 to 1...
AI summary Amendment 11 to the MEPS for electric motors increases efficiency requirements and expands coverage to more motor sizes. It modifies exclusions and extends MEPS to larger motors, aiming to improve energy efficiency and align with U.S. standards. The regulation came into effect in 2012 for motors manufactured after January 1, 2011.
Table 5: Electric Motors – Minimum Nominal Efficiency Standard (Premium) 22 Energy Efficiency Standard (Percentage) Item Power in HP Power in kW Open Enclosed 2 Pole 4 Pole 6 Pole 2 Pole 4 Pole 6 Pole 1. 1 0.75 77.0 85.5 82.5 77.0 85.5 82....
AI summary Table 5 outlines the minimum nominal efficiency standards for electric motors, categorized by horsepower and kilowatt ratings, with separate standards for open and enclosed motors. The data reflects efficiency percentages for different pole configurations.
Table 6: Electric Motors – Minimum Nominal Efficiency Standard (Energy Efficient) 23 Energy Efficiency Standard (Percentage) Item Power in HP Power in kW Open Enclosed 2 Pole 4 Pole 6 Pole 8 Pole 2 Pole 4 Pole 6 Pole 8 Pole 1. 1 0.75 75.5...
AI summary The document presents a table outlining the minimum nominal efficiency standards for electric motors, categorized by power in horsepower (HP) and kilowatts (kW), with different efficiency percentages for open and enclosed motors across various pole configurations.
3.1.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard The new regulations require the majority of electric motors that were already regulated (2-, 4- and 6 pole motors sized 1 to 200 HP) to meet or exceed higher MEPS (premium effi...
AI summary The new regulations expand efficiency requirements to include more electric motors, requiring previously regulated motors to meet higher MEPS standards and newly covered motors to meet the efficiency levels of former regulations, affecting most three-phase electric motors of 1 to 500 HP.
3.1.6 Unitary Savings Values In Amendment 11 , the unitary savings values for some types of electric motors are provided. That information is presented in [Table 10.](#page-83-0)
AI summary Amendment 11 provides unitary savings values for certain types of electric motors, as detailed in Table 10.
Table 10: Unitary Savings Values – Electric Motors 29 Product Class Annual Peak Demand Savings (W/yr./unit) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr./unit) 5 horsepower 51 133 15 horsepower 103 325 30 horsepower 175 637 75 horsepower 464 2,161 150 ho...
AI summary Table 10 presents unitary savings values for electric motors of various horsepower ratings, detailing both annual peak demand savings and annual energy savings. The section 'At Meter Energy Savings' is introduced, suggesting a focus on energy efficiency metrics.
The Evaluator estimated the impact of the introduction of this standard in the Nova Scotian market, in terms of "at meter" energy savings, by using the data collected on unitary savings, the market size of electric motors in Nova Scotia an...
AI summary The Evaluator estimated energy savings from the introduction of electric motor standards in Nova Scotia using unitary savings data, market size, and non-compliance rates. For motors between 26 to 100 HP, an average of savings values for 30 HP and 75 HP motors was used. The estimated total energy savings at meter is 1.146 GWh.
3.2.1 Product Description Incandescent reflector lamps are lamps that emit both light and heat in all directions. They are called reflector lamps because they direct light primarily away from the base by means of a reflective coating on a...
AI summary This section describes incandescent reflector lamps, their design, and how they are categorized based on wattage for energy efficiency regulations in Canada and the U.S. Each wattage category has a minimum average efficacy requirement.
Previous Regulations When the first Canadian Energy Efficiency Regulations came into effect in 1995, MEPS were introduced for general service incandescent reflector lamps. 30 "Consistent with the U.S. Energy Policy" Act of 1992" these regu...
AI summary The text outlines the evolution of Canadian Energy Efficiency Regulations, starting with the introduction of MEPS for general service incandescent reflector lamps in 1995, followed by a 2002 revision that expanded the scope of MEPS and introduced exemptions for certain BR lamps.
3.2.4 Estimating the Market Size In a report prepared by Navigant Consulting (a report commissioned by NRCan in order to prepare the amendment to the Regulations targeting general service incandescent reflector lamps), national Canadian sh...
AI summary This section discusses the estimation of the market size for BR and ER lamps in Canada and Nova Scotia, using data from Navigant Consulting's report commissioned by NRCan. The data was derived from surveys and studies conducted by EFC, and provincial population ratios were used to estimate shipments for Nova Scotia.
Table 16: Estimated 2012 Market Size of BR and ER Lamps in Canada and in Nova Scotia 39 Product Class Shipments to Canada in 2012 Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 60–66 W BR – residential 2,110,512 shipments 58,039 shipments 67–85 W BR – r...
AI summary Table 16 provides estimates of the 2012 market size for BR and ER lamps in Canada and Nova Scotia. Due to a lack of specific categories in Statistics Canada's database, the data was validated by manufacturers and distributors during interviews.
However, to facilitate the interview process, some product classes were regrouped and shipment numbers were rounded (see [Table 17)](#page-89-1). Table 17: Data Presented to Manufacturers and Distributors during the Interviews – 2012 Marke...
AI summary The text discusses the regrouping and rounding of product shipment data for BR and ER lamps in Canada and Nova Scotia in 2012, as presented in Table 17. The data is provided to manufacturers and distributors during interviews.
3.2.6 Unitary Savings Values When Amendment 11 was published in the Canada Gazette , the Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE) published the unitary savings values for some of the general service incandescent reflector lamps targeted by the Re...
AI summary This section discusses the publication of unitary savings values for general service incandescent reflector lamps by the Office of Energy Efficiency following the release of Amendment 11 in the Canada Gazette. The values are presented in Table 20.
3.2.7 At Meter Energy Savings Econoler estimates that 6.716 GWh were saved, at meter, in Nova Scotia in 2012 as a result of the introduction of the standard for general service incandescent reflector lamps.
AI summary Econoler estimates that the introduction of the standard for general service incandescent reflector lamps in Nova Scotia resulted in 6.716 GWh of energy savings at the meter in 2012.
Table 21: Energy Savings from the Introduction of the General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Standard in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by t...
AI summary Table 21 presents energy savings from the introduction of the General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Standard in Nova Scotia. The table shows the number of shipments, percentage affected by the standard, annual energy savings per unit, and total energy savings at the meter for 2012 across different product classes and sectors.
3.2.8 At Meter Demand Savings Econoler estimates that 3.764 MW were saved, at meter, in Nova Scotia in 2012 as a result of introducing the standard for general service incandescent reflector lamps. The diversity factor of 97 percent comes...
AI summary Econoler estimates that 3.764 MW of demand savings were achieved at the meter in Nova Scotia in 2012 due to the introduction of standards for general service incandescent reflector lamps. The diversity factor of 97% was derived from the 2012 BER evaluation report, which used on-site visits to assess the average diversity factor of installed lighting products.
Single Phase Efficiency (%) Three Phase Efficiency (%) kVA 20-45kV BIL 46-95kV BIL 96-199kV BIL kVA 20-45kV BIL 46-95kV BIL 96-199kV BIL 15 98.10 97.86 97.60 15 97.50 97.18 96.80 25 98.33 98.12 97.90 30 97.90 97.63 97.30 37.5 98.49 98.30 9...
AI summary The text presents efficiency percentages for single-phase and three-phase transformers across various kVA ratings, with data spanning from 15kVA to 7,500kVA. The information is sourced from a regulatory bulletin by the Office of Energy Efficiency, dated October 2011.
Table 31: Minimum Efficiency Levels for Air-conditioning Condensing Units 70 Product Class (ARI type classification) Cooling Capacity Range kW(1000Btu/h) Cooling Minimum Efficiency (EER) RCU-A Condensing unit, air-cooled 19-70 (135-240) 10...
AI summary Table 31 outlines the minimum efficiency levels for air-conditioning condensing units, specifying cooling capacity ranges and minimum efficiency (EER) requirements for different product classes. A new regulation is referenced, likely related to energy efficiency standards.
3.5.4 Estimation of the Market Size In 2008, Caneta Research produced a report for NRCan titled Market, Benchmark and Technical Analysis for Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps for Future Regulation Amendment . 77 In this study, Caneta R...
AI summary This section discusses the estimation of the market size for large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia in 2012, based on historical shipment data from 2002 to 2006 and demographic weightings. The analysis used the Microsoft Excel 'forecast' formula to project market size.
Table 33: Estimated 2012 Market Size of Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps in Canada and in Nova Scotia 79 Product Class Shipments to Canada in 2012 Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Medium air conditioners (≥ 19.0 kW and < 39.6 kW (≥ 65...
AI summary Table 33 provides estimated 2012 market sizes for large air conditioners and heat pumps in Canada and Nova Scotia. It highlights differences in shipment numbers between the two regions and notes limitations in the data, such as the upper capacity limit for large equipment and the lack of distinction between air-cooled and water-cooled condensers.
Table 34: 2012 Market Size of Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps in Nova Scotia 82 Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Medium air conditioners (≥ 19.0 kW and < 39.6 kW (≥ 65,000 Btu/h and < 135,000 Btu/h)) 338 shipments Large...
AI summary Table 34 provides data on the market size of large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia in 2012. The data is based on shipments and covers only 8 months of the year. The Evaluator used HRAI data to estimate the impact of a new standard, noting that the data did not distinguish between large heat pumps and single package vertical heat pumps.
3.5.5 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Standard In its report, Caneta Research notes that "at the time of the study [2008, ed], of equipment sold in Canada, 90% were minimum-efficiency, 7% were mid-efficiency and only 3% were high-eff...
AI summary Caneta Research's 2008 study indicates that 90% of equipment sold in Canada met minimum efficiency standards, with only 3% being high-efficiency. However, due to lack of precise non-compliance data, the analysis assumes a 90% non-compliance rate for all equipment targeted by the standard in Nova Scotia.
Table 36: Unitary Savings Values – Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps 84 Product Class Peak Demand Savings (W/yr./unit) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr./unit) Medium air conditioners (≥ 19.0 kW and < 39.6 kW (≥ 65,000 Btu/h and < 135,000...
AI summary Table 36 presents unitary savings values for large air conditioners and heat pumps, including peak demand savings and annual energy savings. These values are categorized by product class and are relevant to energy efficiency and conservation efforts.
Using these unitary savings, estimates of the market size of large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia and estimates of total shipments to Nova Scotia affected by the standard in 2012, the Evaluator estimates that the introducti...
AI summary The introduction of energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia is estimated to have resulted in energy savings of 0.844 GWh, based on unitary savings and market size estimates from 2012.
Table 37: Energy Savings from the Introduction of the Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Sta...
AI summary Table 37 presents energy savings data from the introduction of MEPS for large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia. It details shipments, energy savings per unit, and total energy savings at the meter for different product classes in 2012.
Econoler estimates that 0.282 MW were saved, at meter, in Nova Scotia in 2012 as a result of introducing the standard for general service incandescent reflector lamps. A diversity factor of 0 percent was applied to air conditioners since t...
AI summary Econoler estimates energy savings from the introduction of incandescent reflector lamp standards in Nova Scotia in 2012. The analysis also discusses diversity factors applied to air conditioners and heat pumps, based on peak electricity demand periods and evaluation reports.
Table 38: Demand Savings from the Introduction of the Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Sta...
AI summary Table 38 outlines demand savings from the introduction of the Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Standard in Nova Scotia. The table details shipments, percentage of shipments affected by the standard, annual demand savings, diversity factor, and total demand savings at the meter for various product classes in 2012.
3.7.4 Estimation of the Market Size The initial estimate of the market size of these products was based on a study produced by Ecos. Using different sources such as the 2008 Consumer Electronics Market (CEM) Trends and Forecast and Navigan...
AI summary The market size for standby power products in Canada and Nova Scotia was estimated using data from Ecos, based on shipment data from 2002 to 2007 and projected to 2012 using Excel trend formulas and scatter plots. The estimate for Nova Scotia was based on its demographic weight.
3.7.8 At Meter Demand Savings Because of the different nature of each product class and the lack of information necessary to evaluate a diversity factor for each product class, Econoler was unable to estimate demand savings with a sufficie...
AI summary Econoler was unable to estimate demand savings with sufficient precision due to the lack of information on diversity factors for different product classes. However, it believes the diversity factor would be minimal, leading to negligible demand savings.
3.8.1 Product Description As defined by NRCan, external power supplies are small external plug-in devices that convert AC 120V line voltage to a lower voltage either alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) to power various small pr...
AI summary The text defines external power supplies as devices that convert AC line voltage to lower voltages for small electronic products. It references a bulletin from the Office of Energy Efficiency regarding standards for external power supplies.
Table 47: Minimum Efficacy Levels – External Power Supplies 117 Nameplate Output Minimum Average Efficiency in Active Mode (In Watts Expressed as a Decimal) Maximum Power in No-load Mode (Not Applicable to Security EPS) < 1 watt 0.5 namepl...
AI summary Table 47 outlines minimum efficacy levels for external power supplies, specifying efficiency requirements and maximum no-load power consumption. The regulations are aligned with European and U.S. standards, including the European Imaging and Sound Association MEPS and H.R.5470.
Table 48: 2012 Market Size of External Power Supplies in Canada and in Nova Scotia 122 External Power Supplies Class Shipments to Canada in 2012 Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Less than 1 W 3,794,219 shipments 104,341 shipments 1 to 5 W...
AI summary Table 48 provides data on the 2012 market size of external power supplies in Canada and Nova Scotia, categorized by power class. The data was collected from manufacturers and distributors after interviews were completed and was not available in Statistics Canada's database.
3.8.5 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Standard In Ecos' report, non-compliance rates for shipments to Canada in 2008 were estimated. 123 However, without provincial statistics, Canadian percentages were applied to the Nova Scotian ma...
AI summary The text discusses non-compliance rates for shipments to Canada in 2008, as estimated in Ecos' report. Due to the lack of provincial statistics, Canadian percentages were applied to the Nova Scotian market. Table 49 provides data on the portion of products sold with an external power supply impacted by the standard.
Product Class Percentage of Total Shipments to Canada Affected by the Standard in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 <1 watts 78% 78% 1-5 watts 63% 63% 5-10 watts 63% 63% 11-20 watts 75% 75%...
AI summary The table shows the percentage of shipments to Canada and Nova Scotia affected by energy efficiency standards in 2012, categorized by product class. These data were used to estimate the impact of new MEPS on the Nova Scotian market, as participants could not estimate non-compliance rates.
3.8.6 Unitary Savings Values Below are the unitary savings values provided by Ecos in its spreadsheet:
AI summary This section presents unitary savings values provided by Ecos in a spreadsheet as part of the regulatory proceeding.
Table 50: Unitary Savings Values – Products Sold with an External Power Supply 125 Product Class Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr./unit) <1 watts 5.97 1-5 watts 0.01 5-10 watts 7.99 11-20 watts 0.51 21-50 watts 3.10 51-100 watts 4.51 > 100 wa...
AI summary Table 50 presents unitary savings values for products sold with an external power supply, categorized by product class and annual energy savings in kWh per year per unit. The table includes various wattage ranges and corresponding energy savings values. The section also references 'At Meter Energy Savings' as a related topic.
Based on Ecos' data, the Evaluator estimates that the standard for external power supplies generated energy savings of 3.480 GWh in Nova Scotia in 2012.
AI summary The Evaluator estimates that the standard for external power supplies generated energy savings of 3.480 GWh in Nova Scotia in 2012, based on data from Ecos.
3.8.8 At Meter Demand Savings Econoler did not estimate demand savings for this C&S since the necessary information to calculate a diversity factor for each product class was not available. However, Econoler believes that, considering the...
AI summary Econoler did not estimate demand savings for the C&S due to missing information on diversity factors, but believes the diversity factor would be minimal given the sporadic usage of targeted products, leading to negligible demand savings.
Table 52: Evaluation Results - Energy Savings and Demand Savings for all Codes and Standards Product Category Electric Motors General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Standby Power External Power S...
AI summary Table 52 presents evaluation results for energy and demand savings across various product categories under codes and standards. It includes energy savings in GWh, demand savings in MW, and line loss factors for different categories such as electric motors, lamps, air conditioners, and power supplies.
BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES Canadian Standards Association, Minimum efficiency for dry-type transformers , http://www.hammondpowersolutions.com/upload_files/csa_c802%202-2006.pdf, January 23, 2007, p. 6. Caneta Research, Commercial Refrigera...
AI summary The bibliography and references section lists various documents and studies related to energy efficiency, appliance standards, and transformer regulations. These include reports from organizations such as Caneta Research, Ecos, Navigant Consulting, and the Office of Energy Efficiency, covering topics like standby power use, market analysis, and regulatory amendments.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank Ms. Delves - Self-introduction by interviewer and colleague - Introduction of ENSC study Goal: The objective is to quantify the impact of the introduction of 12 new standards in the Nova Scotia market in te...
AI summary The objective of the interview is to assess the impact of introducing 12 new energy efficiency standards in Nova Scotia. The interviewee is asked to identify relevant contacts for more information on these standards and to provide sources such as market analyses for secondary research.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The interview aims to validate estimations on the impact of new energy efficiency standards for electric motors of 500 HP or less in Nova Scotia. The focus is on quantifying savings in the Canadian and Nova Scotian markets.
[IF NUMBERS DO NOT SEEM ACCURATE TO THE RESPONDANT] Do these numbers regarding all electric motors look more realistic to you? Products Number of Shipments to Canada Number of Shipments to Nova Scotia Electric motors of 1 to 100 HP 313 000...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions regarding the shipment of electric motors to Canada and Nova Scotia, particularly focusing on the percentage of shipments to Nova Scotia relative to total Canadian shipments and the proportion of motors impacted by new energy efficiency standards in 2012.
PROBE: The Office of Energy Efficiency has estimated that […] would be impacted for the whole Canadian market. Do those proportions seem appropriate to you? Provide an explanation. Products Proportion Impacted by the New Standard Electric...
AI summary The Office of Energy Efficiency has estimated that a significant proportion of electric motors in Canada would be impacted by new energy efficiency standards. The percentages range from 47.5% to 77.1% across different motor sizes, with the total for motors up to 500 HP being 60.7%. The question raised is whether these proportions are appropriate.
Products Percentage of All Canadian Shipments Being Shipped to Nova Scotia (2012) Residential BR lamps of 60 to 85 W % Residential BR lamps of 86 to 155 W % Commercial BR lamps of 60 to 85 W % Commercial BR lamps of 86 to 155 W % Residenti...
AI summary The document presents tables asking for data on the proportion of general service incandescent reflector lamps shipped to Nova Scotia in 2012 and the impact of new energy efficiency standards on these products. It also asks about sources of market data for these lamps.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The interview aims to validate estimations on the impact of new energy efficiency standards in Nova Scotia, focusing on three-phase dry-type transformers. The discussion involves market size assessments for these transformers in both Canada and Nova Scotia.
Products Percentage of All Canadian Shipments Being Shipped to Nova Scotia (2012) Three-phase dry-type transformers of 15 to 750 kVA % Three-phase dry-type transformers of 1000 kVA % Three-phase dry-type transformers of 1500 kVA % Three-ph...
AI summary The document includes tables and a question about the proportion of three-phase dry-type transformers shipped to Nova Scotia in 2012 that were impacted by a new minimum energy efficiency standard. It also references estimates from the Office of Energy Efficiency for the Canadian market.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The introduction outlines an interview aimed at validating estimations of market size for commercial self-contained refrigerators and freezers in Canada and Nova Scotia, following the introduction of 9 new energy efficiency standards.
3. What percentage of total shipments of commercial refrigerators and freezers to Canada do you think the sales of these products represent? Products Percentage of Total Commercial Refrigerator and Freezer shipments Opaque self-contained r...
AI summary The document asks for the percentage of total shipments of commercial refrigerators and freezers to Canada that are sold in Nova Scotia, as well as the proportion of these products impacted by new minimum energy efficiency standards in 2012. It also references an estimate from the Office of Energy Efficiency regarding the impact of these standards on the Canadian market.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The interview aims to validate estimations of market size for large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia following the introduction of 9 new energy efficiency standards. The focus is on quantifying the impact of these standards in terms of energy savings.
4. To your knowledge, in 2012, approximately which proportion of large air conditioners and heat pumps and single package vertical air conditioners and heat pumps shipped to Nova Scotia was impacted by the new minimum energy efficiency sta...
AI summary The question asks for the proportion of large air conditioners, heat pumps, and single package vertical air conditioners and heat pumps shipped to Nova Scotia in 2012 that were impacted by new minimum energy efficiency standards.
Products Proportion Impacted by the New Standard Medium air conditioners (between 19.0 kW and 39.6 kW (between 65 kBtu/h and 135 kBtu/h)) % Large air conditioners (between 39.6 kW and 70.3 kW (between 135 kBtu/h and 240 kBtu/h)) % Very lar...
AI summary The document presents a table showing the proportion of various air conditioning and heat pump products impacted by new energy efficiency standards. It asks for feedback on whether the estimated proportions seem appropriate and inquires about the sources of market data used for air conditioners and heat pumps.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The interview aims to validate estimations of market size and energy savings from introducing 9 new standards for electronic products with standby/sleep modes in Canada and Nova Scotia. The focus is on quantifying the impact of these standards.
Products Percentage of All Canadian Shipments Being Shipped to Nova Scotia (2012) Integrated stereo % Portable audio % Televisions % Non-recording video players % Recording video players % 4. To your knowledge, in 2012, approximately which...
AI summary The text includes tables and a question regarding the proportion of specific audio and video products shipped to Nova Scotia in 2012 that were impacted by new minimum energy efficiency standards. The tables are incomplete and lack data, and the question seeks to understand the impact of these standards on various product categories.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The introduction outlines an interview aimed at validating estimations of market size impacts from new energy efficiency standards for electronic products using external power supplies in Canada and Nova Scotia. The interview is part of an ENSC study and is designed to gather insights without expecting incorrect answers.
Products Percentage of All Canadian Shipments Being Shipped to Nova Scotia (2012) Mobile phones (5 watts or less) % Small flat panel TV/monitors (21 to 50 watts) % Flat panel monitors (51 to 100 watts) % Notebooks (51 to 100 watts) % High...
AI summary The text presents tables and questions regarding the proportion of mobile phones, flat panel TV/monitors, and notebooks shipped to Nova Scotia in 2012 that were impacted by new minimum energy efficiency standards, as well as sources of market data for these products.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →