E-22017 DSM Evaluation Reports
1177 passages
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. The ratio of evaluated results to tracked results. This ratio expresses the Adjustment ratio adjustment made to tracked savings or other tracked values such as...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency measurement and verification, including accuracy, base case, displaced wattage, and EnerGuide ratings. These definitions are critical for evaluating program effectiveness and ensuring reliable energy savings calculations in regulatory proceedings.
efficiency of the building only and does not take into account occupant EnerGuide rating behaviour. It shows how energy efficient the home is through modelled heat losses of the home, based on several factors including building envelope ch...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) metrics, including EnerGuide ratings, effective useful life, equivalent CO2, and evaluated savings. These concepts are used to assess building energy performance, measure the longevity of energy-saving measures, and quantify GHG emissions equivalencies.
rtain period before being installed, such as LED bulbs. The energy savings that occur over the lifetime of an energy efficiency Lifetime energy measure. Lifetime energy savings account for a measure’s effective useful savings life and any...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency program evaluation, including lifetime energy savings, line loss factor, net energy savings, and peak coincidence factor. These metrics are critical for measuring program effectiveness, accounting for system losses, market effects, and energy savings attribution.
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component ............................................. 4 Table 2: 2017 Interviews Completed .............................................................................
AI summary The document lists tables from a 2017 evaluation report covering program components, energy savings, GHG emissions, free-ridership, and recommendations. Tables track interviews, surveys, on-site visits, energy savings metrics, NTGRs, and crosscutting program recommendations, likely related to Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) initiatives.
........................... 37 Table 15: Recommendations for Appliance Retirement ....................................................................... 39 Table 16: Recommendations for Instant Savings .......................................
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for various energy efficiency programs evaluated by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and business rebates. It references Project No. 6138 and the evaluation of 2017 DSM programs, highlighting initiatives under demand-side management and energy efficiency.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary INTRODUCTION Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is a franchise held by EfficiencyOne and is responsible for helping Nova Scotians improve the energy efficiency of their homes and workplaces. ENS designs,...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), a franchise of EfficiencyOne, delivers energy efficiency programs funded by Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia. Econoler evaluated ENS's 2017 demand-side management (DSM) program portfolio and assessed impacts of Nova Scotia's energy efficiency codes, collaborating with CRA, Research Into Action, and other firms.
odes and standards introduced in Nova Scotia. To carry out this assignment, Econoler collaborated with Research Into Action, Equilibrium Engineering, Corporate Research Associates (CRA) and Technosim. Econoler served as team leader in the...
AI summary The Evaluator team, led by Econoler and including CRA, Research Into Action, and others, evaluated ENS's 2017 DSM program. The evaluation found 130.749 GWh net energy savings, 23.679 MW peak demand savings, and 85,393 tonnes of CO2 eq avoided annually, with additional savings from Codes and Standards.
838 GWh. In addition to the savings generated by ENS DSM programs, Codes and Standards were found to have achieved energy savings of 21.914 GWh and peak demand savings of 4.028 MW at the generator2. 1 Throughout this report, energy savings...
AI summary This report evaluates ENS's 2017 DSM programs, noting 838 GWh in energy savings and 21.914 GWh from Codes & Standards (excluded as not ENS-conducted). It outlines evaluation objectives, methodology, impact results, and recommendations for program improvements.
Participants Retailers Associations Manager Contractors Advisors Appliance Retirement 1 - 1 - - - Instant Savings 1 - - 8 - - Home Energy Assessment 1 - - - 4 - Green Heat 1 20 - - - - Efficient Product Installation 1 - - - - - New Home Co...
AI summary The table presents participation numbers across energy efficiency programs and stakeholder roles in Nova Scotia. It highlights varying levels of engagement from retailers, contractors, and advisors for initiatives like Appliance Retirement, Instant Savings, and Business Energy Rebates, with totals indicating program-specific involvement metrics.
Surveys Completed in 2017 Program Component Participants Intercept Builders Instant Savings - 100 - Home Energy Assessment 70 - - Green Heat 141 - - Efficient Product Installation 100 - - New Home Construction 13 - 59 Business Energy Rebat...
AI summary A 2017 survey summary shows participation numbers across various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including Instant Savings, Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and others, with varying participant counts and intercepts. The New Home Construction program involved builders, and participant breakdowns include mail-in and rebate categories.
34 Small Business Energy Solutions 55 Total 309 2.4 Unitary Savings Review For the evaluated program components where savings were established on a unitary basis, the Evaluator reviewed the savings presented in the tracking system. First,...
AI summary This section discusses the Unitary Savings Review process, where the Evaluator validated and updated savings data based on previous evaluations, technical references, and product specifications. It outlines methodologies used for different program components, including Efficient Product Installation and Instant Savings.
.g. lighting projects). This methodology was applied to Custom and Small Business Energy Solutions, the Mail-in Rebates service of Business Energy Rebates and some measure categories under Green Heat. 2.6 Billing Analysis For Green Heat, a...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs and their evaluation methods, including billing and metering analyses for initiatives like Green Heat and Efficient Product Installation. These analyses aim to assess energy savings and ensure accurate data collection for program effectiveness.
oducts will no longer constitute an adequate baseline in the EUL of LED products and calculated an equivalent EUL that accurately yields lifetime energy savings when multiplying by first-year savings. 2.10 Avoided GHG Emissions Quantificat...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2017 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including the calculation of energy savings, peak demand reductions, and avoided GHG emissions using Nova Scotia-specific factors derived from Nova Scotia Power's 2016 data.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement 5.266 5.266 0.59 3.094 23.050 4.852 2.761 Product Rebates Instant Savings 22.343 22.343 0.87 19.543 179.116 23.562 26.162 Home Energy Assessment 8.959 8.306 0.76 7.007 140.139 8.945 7.145 Existing...
AI summary The text provides a summary of various energy efficiency programs and their associated costs and rebates, including residential and business initiatives such as appliance retirement, instant savings, home energy assessments, and efficient product installation. It includes figures for different categories and subtotals.
ems 1.752 1.402 1.00 1.402 4.112 1.752 1.752 Direct Installation Small Business Energy Solutions 10.036 8.920 0.88 7.887 100.854 10.036 8.757 BNI Subtotal 100.862 93.208 0.82 76.877 966.078 100.862 84.015 Portfolio Total 171.086 156.800 0....
AI summary The text presents numerical data related to energy efficiency programs, including Direct Installation, Small Business Energy Solutions, and BNI Subtotal, with values for different years and categories. It also mentions the absence of Strategic Energy Management (SEM) savings in 2017 due to the start date of the latest cohort.
Appliance Retirement 0.740 0.740 0.60 0.443 0.368 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Instant Savings 2.993 2.993 0.85 2.558 5.186 Home Energy Assessment 2.535 2.348 0.76 1.981 2.029 Existing Residential Green Heat 4.271 5.114 0.60 3.073...
AI summary The text presents a table with various energy efficiency programs and their associated metrics, including appliance retirement, residential and business rebates, and custom incentives. It includes numerical data such as costs, quantities, and percentages, but no explicit discussion or arguments are made.
Executive Summary The following subsections discuss how evaluated savings compare to ENS tracked savings for each program and component. 3.1.1 Residential DSM Programs Residential Efficient Product Rebates The Residential Efficient Product...
AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2017, with Appliance Retirement and HomeWarming contributing notably. Evaluated savings exceeded tracked savings due to higher energy consumption in retired appliances and changes in the peak-demand-to-energy ratio for dehumidifiers.
er than the tracked net peak demand savings due to the higher revised energy savings as well as an increase in the peak-demand-to-energy ratio for dehumidifiers (from 0.000 to 0.335). Instant Savings In 2017, a total of 710,540 eligible pr...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2017 DSM programs in Nova Scotia shows that Instant Savings achieved 19.543 GWh in net energy savings and 2.588 MW in net peak demand savings. These figures are lower than tracked savings due to a decrease in LED lamp sales and a unitary savings review.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary The evaluated net peak demand savings are 49 percent lower than the tracked net peak demand savings. This difference is largely due to the same reasons as the lower energy savings, but is further ex...
AI summary The evaluated net peak demand savings for Efficiency Nova Scotia's Existing Residential programs are 49% lower than tracked savings, primarily due to lower evaluated peak demand-to-energy ratios from the 2017 Residential Lighting Metering Study. Home Energy Assessment achieved 7.007 GWh in net energy savings and 1.981 MW in net peak demand savings, slightly lower than tracked values due to a reduction in spillover levels in 2017.
er than those tracked by ENS due to the adjustment made for participants who installed an MSHP or ASHP in non-electrically heated households, for which ENS had tracked 0.0 MW in peak demand savings. Project No. 6138 18 Evaluation of 2017 D...
AI summary In 2017, the Efficient Product Installation program saw 13,672 households participate, with 377,875 efficient products installed. The program achieved 17.877 GWh in net energy savings and 2.129 MW in net peak demand savings. Evaluated savings were slightly lower than tracked savings, primarily due to a decrease in the installation rate of smart power controllers.
S tracked results to 57% in evaluated results). The adjustments made to the unitary savings and the interactive effects had only a small impact on the difference between tracked and evaluated savings. The evaluated net peak demand savings...
AI summary The New Residential program, including New Home Construction and the Passive House pilot, achieved energy and peak demand savings in 2017. Evaluated savings were higher than tracked savings due to increased market effects and changes in peak demand-to-energy ratios. The Efficient Product Installation program was introduced in 2017 following a merger of other programs.
peak demand savings explain most of this variation; those adjustments increased the evaluated savings by 1.012 MW for both the gross and net peak demand savings. Energy Management Information Systems Four participants reported savings in 2...
AI summary The evaluation of 2017 DSM programs highlights energy savings from Energy Management Information Systems and Direct Installation initiatives, particularly noting the impact of adjustments on evaluated savings and the contribution of peak demand savings. The Small Business Energy Solutions program achieved significant net energy and peak demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary Small Business Energy Solutions In 2017, among the 417 projects completed through Small Business Energy Solutions, 367 were implemented by following the do it yourself (DIY) path and 50 were impleme...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's Small Business Energy Solutions program had 417 completed projects in 2017, with 367 using the DIY path and 50 using the audit path. Evaluated net energy savings were 10% below tracked figures due to adjustments in lighting measures. Net peak demand savings were 24% lower due to revised peak coincidence factors for lighting measures. The Evaluator also examined the impact of federal and provincial energy codes and standards, including NRCan Amendment 13.
Refrigerators - 0.55 Freezers - 0.55 Air Conditioners - 1% 0.32 Appliance Retirement a, b Small Refrigerators - 0.50 Small Freezers - 0.50 HomeWarming Appliances - - 1 LED Lamps 32% 16% 0.83 Instant Savings All Other Products - - 1 Home En...
AI summary The text presents data on various energy efficiency programs and their participation rates, including appliance retirement, instant savings, home energy assessments, and green heat initiatives. It includes participation percentages and other metrics for different categories of appliances and homes.
New Home Construction Passive House Pilot 61% - 0.39 LED Lamps Non-low Income Tenants 14% 1% 0.87 LED Lamps Non-low Income Owners 26% 6% 0.80 LED Lamps Low-income Participants - - 1 Efficient Product Installation Other Products Non-low Inc...
AI summary The text presents data on various energy efficiency programs, including participation rates and performance metrics for initiatives such as LED lamp installations, efficient product installation, and business energy rebates. It highlights varying levels of participation across different categories and income groups.
ch are offered across several program components and represent most of the 2017 energy savings, remained quite high in 2017. This result is discussed in the Market Evolution Section (section 5) below. 3.3 Lifetime Energy Savings The Evalua...
AI summary The evaluation of 2017 DSM programs highlights that energy savings remained high, with the ENS portfolio generating 1,620.838 GWh in lifetime energy savings. Measures affecting the building envelope, such as insulation, have longer effective useful lives, contributing significantly to lifetime savings.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement 3.094 23.050 7.4 Product Rebates Instant Savings 19.543 179.116 9.2 Home Energy Assessment 7.007 140.139 20.0 Existing Residential Green Heat 2.980 53.925 18.1 Efficient Product Installation 17.87...
AI summary The document presents a summary of energy efficiency programs and their associated costs and savings. It includes data on residential and BNI (Business, non-profit and institutional) programs such as appliance rebates, home energy assessments, and energy management systems, along with their financial metrics.
12.4 Due to the start date of the latest Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, SEM did not have any participants who achieved savings in 2017; therefore, no evaluation was conducted for 2017. 3.4 Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions The...
AI summary The 2017 DSM program evaluation did not include Strategic Energy Management (SEM) due to the start date of the latest cohort. The evaluation also calculated avoided GHG emissions from the DSM portfolio for the first time in 2017.
Table 9: Evaluated Avoided GHG Emissions in 2017 Avoided GHG DSM Program Program Component Emissions CO2 eq Tonnes Residential Appliance Retirement 2,021 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Instant Savings 12,764 Home Energy Assessment 4...
AI summary The table presents evaluated avoided GHG emissions in 2017 across various demand-side management (DSM) programs, including appliance retirement, efficient product rebates, home energy assessments, and business energy rebates, with total avoided emissions amounting to 35,184 CO2 eq tonnes.
Energy Management Information Systems 916 Direct Installation Small Business Energy Solutions 5,151 BNI Subtotal 50,209 Portfolio Total 85,393 Codes & Standards 14,312 Total (Portfolio and C&S) 99,705 Due to the start date of the latest St...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of 2017 demand-side management (DSM) programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including the quantification of avoided GHG emissions and the exclusion of certain measures like fuel-switching in new construction.
37.2 5.9 46.583 7.286 25% 24% Rebates Custom 24.8 1.9 21.005 3.637 -15% 95% Custom Energy Management Information 4.0 0.1 1.402 0.255 -65% 88% Incentives Systems Strategic Energy Management 1.7 0.2 0.000 0.000 -100% -100% Direct Installatio...
AI summary The ENS DSM portfolio achieved 130.749 GWh in net energy savings, 4% below the planned target, with residential programs contributing 53.872 GWh, 10% below expectations. Net peak demand savings of 23.679 MW exceeded the planned target by 13%.
y savings were 10 percent lower than planned due to lower than expected savings from the Existing Residential and New Residential programs, which were both 16 percent below the planned energy savings. The underperformance of those two prog...
AI summary The 2017 DSM programs underperformed in some areas, particularly in the Existing and New Residential programs due to lower participation. However, the Appliance Retirement and Home Energy Assessment programs exceeded planned savings. Green Heat also contributed unexpectedly higher demand savings, especially from heat pumps in non-electrically heated households.
Heat. For the latter, no peak demand savings had been anticipated for heat pumps installed in non-electrically heated households. Therefore, the planned demand savings were lower than actual results. The ENS BNI programs achieved 76.877 GW...
AI summary The ENS BNI programs achieved significant energy savings, exceeding planned targets, primarily due to strong performance in Business Energy Rebates. However, some components underperformed due to lower participation. Participant and partner satisfaction remained high, with positive feedback on professionalism and quality of work.
erformed. As for partners, most were satisfied with their interactions with ENS and value their involvement in the program. Table 11 below presents satisfaction scores obtained in the 2017 evaluation. Participants gave all program componen...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's DSM programs shows high participant satisfaction across most components, with the exception of New Home Construction. The merger of two programs into Efficient Product Installation was well-received, but partner satisfaction with Instant Savings declined due to frustrations with a price floor for LED products.
37.275 24.607 15.675 16.360 23% 16% 11% 12% (Residential Direct Installc) 17.877 14% Efficient Product Installation (Rental 2.100 2.720 3.287 2.638 1% 2% 2% 2% Properties and Condos Serviced) New Residential New Home Construction 5.890 4.5...
AI summary The text presents numerical data related to energy efficiency programs, including residential and BNI (Business, non-profit and institutional) initiatives. It includes figures for various programs like Efficient Product Installation, Home Energy Report, and Business Energy Rebates, along with percentages and values associated with them.
Residential Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement 0.645 0.627 0.477 0.363 0.443 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% Product Rebates Instant Savings 3.793 1.479 1.599 6.77 2.558 11% 6% 7% 26% 11% LED Holiday Light Exchange 0.653 0.414 0.174 2% 2% 1% Home E...
AI summary The text presents data on various residential energy efficiency programs, including appliance retirement, product rebates, home energy assessments, and efficient product installation initiatives. It includes metrics such as participation rates and program impacts, but lacks detailed discussion on the themes or arguments related to these programs.
0.359 0.634 0.766 0.568 1% 2% 3% 2% (Rental Properties and Condos Serviced) New Residential New Home Construction 1.545 1.175 1.025 1.106 0.954 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% Home Energy Report Home Energy Report - 2.892 3.724 - 11% 16% Residential Subtot...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency programs and initiatives, including residential and BNI (Business, non-profit and institutional) programs, with figures indicating participation rates and financial allocations. It highlights various incentives and rebate programs, such as Efficient Product Rebates and Strategic Energy Management, and provides percentages related to their impact.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary In 2017, ENS achieved a total of 130.749 GWh in net energy savings and 23.679 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator. These values represent a slight decrease compared to 2016 in both energy...
AI summary In 2017, Efficiency Nova Scotia achieved 130.749 GWh in net energy savings and 23.679 MW in net peak demand savings, a slight decrease from 2016 due to lower residential sector performance. Instant Savings and Green Heat saw significant decreases, while Home Energy Assessment and Appliance Retirement showed increases due to lower free-ridership and upward revisions in unitary savings.
ctor contributed at least 50 percent in all previous years. This is mostly due to the steady increase in savings from Business Energy Rebates, which went from 28 percent in 2016 to 36 percent in 2017. Since ENS transitioned in 2015 toward...
AI summary The evaluation highlights that ENS's energy savings have increased, largely due to Business Energy Rebates and the shift to LED lighting. Lighting measures accounted for a significant portion of savings in 2017, similar to 2016. The Evaluator suggests ENS should continue adapting its offerings to maximize savings and diversify efficient measures.
n various program component offerings should be adapted or removed. These measures were: › Instant Savings: Residential LEDs › Business Energy Rebates: Commercial LEDs › Green Heat: MSHPs In 2017, for each measure, the Evaluator analyzed a...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, focusing on the Instant Savings and Business Energy Rebates programs for LED lighting. It highlights market saturation, price trends, and free-ridership levels for LED lamps in 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary in LED sales is expected to continue in the years ahead since more efficient technology is not currently available and Canadian energy efficiency regulations will not impact LED lamps and fixtures i...
AI summary The document discusses the performance and evolution of the Green Heat program, particularly the inclusion and impact of mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs). It highlights that MSHPs became a significant part of the program after 2015, with participation increasing following changes in eligibility and incentive structures. However, despite high market adoption, efficiency improvements have been minimal since 2015.
ary sources were unavailable).7 However, despite the high prevalence of MSHPs on the market and in Green Heat, there has been very little change in the overall efficiency of incented units since 2015. The market for MSHPs continues to evol...
AI summary The document discusses the market evolution of Mini-split Heat Pumps (MSHPs) in Nova Scotia, noting limited improvements in efficiency despite high market prevalence. It also highlights the implementation of past evaluation recommendations by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) for the 2017 DSM programs.
g the methodology for calculating interactive effects associated with lighting projects for Business Energy Rebates, Small Business Energy Solutions and Custom was implemented in all three components. As part of the 2017 evaluation, the Ev...
AI summary The evaluation of ENS programs highlights that lighting measures accounted for most energy savings in 2017, but the evaluator recommends fostering non-lighting energy efficiency measures to achieve greater savings and mitigate declining lighting savings due to improving LED market efficiency.
led by last year’s participant survey), the program component is still useful in encouraging the retirement of inefficient appliances and educating people about the cost of maintaining old appliances. A total of 5,739 appliances were retir...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement program in Nova Scotia successfully retired over 6,000 inefficient appliances in 2017, including refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners. Evaluations found that while metering improvements were made, larger sample sizes are needed to reduce error margins and better assess energy consumption variations among appliance types.
the margins of error. The average annual consumption values of metered appliances retired were within ranges similar to those of 2016, with the exception of freezers manufactured in 1994 and earlier. The unitary savings values of each type...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement program achieved more than its target energy and peak demand savings in 2017, resulting in significant GHG emission reductions. The Evaluator recommends optimizations to further improve the program's performance.
ARet-R1. Continue to perform the metering activity to increase sample sizes. This year, the Evaluator developed a new metering protocol, which greatly improved the quality of the metering data. Although the metering approach used in 2017 w...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends continuing the metering activity in 2018 using the same protocol as in 2017 to increase sample sizes and improve data quality. They also suggest minor changes, such as using a better tool to measure power factor and measuring the inside temperature of old appliances. Additionally, the Evaluator recommends using unitary savings values established in this year’s evaluation for appliances retired through the ARet pilot and improving the tracking process.
e pilot. The Evaluator also recommends improving the tracking process by clearly identifying the appliances retired through the pilot. 7.1.2 Instant Savings In 2017, a total of 710,540 eligible products were sold in participating stores ac...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Program saw a decrease in LED lamp sales due to the introduction of a price floor, though sales remained higher than previous years. The Evaluator recommends improving tracking of retired appliances through the pilot program.
y indicated that ENS marketing was the most common way for participants to find out about Instant Savings, primarily through in-store promotions, followed by TV ads, the ENS website and word-of-mouth. This year, the Evaluator reviewed the...
AI summary The Instant Savings program used ENS marketing, primarily in-store promotions, to reach participants. The Evaluator reviewed unitary savings values for LED lamps, washers, and refrigerators, noting a decline in free-ridership and spillover effects. The program achieved 19.543 GWh in net energy savings and 2.558 MW in peak demand savings in 2017, avoiding 12,764 tonnes of CO2 eq annually.
rator. These savings represent 12,764 tonnes of CO2 eq in terms of annual avoided GHG emissions. Based on a weighted average EUL value of 9.2 years, the net lifetime energy savings are 179.116 GWh. Project No. 6138 40 Evaluation of 2017 DS...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2017 DSM programs recommends continuing support for expanding LED bulb adoption in Nova Scotia while considering reducing incentives for A-type bulbs and exploring opportunities to shift focus to less adopted bulb types.
ortunities for shifting the focus of the program component, for example to bulb types with lower market adoption, to extend Instant Savings beyond the short-term. Instant-R2. Continue monitoring market indicators and collect additional inf...
AI summary The text discusses opportunities to shift the focus of the Instant Savings program to bulb types with lower market adoption and extend the program beyond the short-term. It also recommends continued monitoring of the LED market and collecting data on installed bulb types and customer knowledge of LEDs through surveys.
Omnibus survey. An Omnibus survey is a cost-effective method where data on a wide variety of subjects is collected during the same interview. 7.1.3 Home Energy Assessment In 2017, the Home Energy Assessment participation level of 931 parti...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program saw a drop in participation after provincial funding ended in 2015, but energy savings per participant increased. Participant and advisor satisfaction was high, though rebate calculations were found challenging.
do not generate high savings compared to other spillover measures observed in previous years. By applying these free-ridership and internal spillover levels, the Evaluator established the NTGR at 0.76 Home Energy Assessment aimed to achiev...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program achieved higher energy and peak demand savings than expected, with 7.007 GWh in net energy savings and 1.981 MW in net peak demand savings. The Evaluator recommends simplifying the incentive structure to improve clarity for EAs and participants.
nges, the Evaluator recommends continuing this effort while trying to make this structure as simple and straightforward as possible for both EAs and participants. HEA-R2. Conduct a billing analysis to review the overestimation ratio. The E...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2017 DSM programs, highlighting changes to the Green Heat program in August 2017, including its relaunch as a mail-in rebate program and the elimination of the pre-approval process. It also mentions the need for a billing analysis to address overestimation ratios in the HEA program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary Green Heat aimed to achieve 3.5 GWh in net energy savings and 1.7 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator for 2017. The Evaluator found that it achieved 2.980 GWh in net energy savings and 3....
AI summary The Green Heat program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2017, but the Evaluator recommends re-analyzing ASHP billing data in 2018 to improve accuracy due to small sample sizes and the need for better categorization of participants based on their existing heating systems.
ctrically heated households generated lower savings, this feedback could provide more insight on whether the inclusion of this measure in Green Heat should be reconsidered. GH-R3. Improve the collection of technical information about ASHPs...
AI summary The evaluation highlights the need to reconsider the inclusion of electrically heated households in the Green Heat program due to lower savings. It also recommends improving the collection of technical data on air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) to enhance the accuracy of peak demand savings calculations, especially with increased ASHP installations.
of eligible equipment, similar to the list established for MSHPs. Contractors could be asked to develop and update this list. 7.1.5 Efficient Product Installation A total number of 13,672 households participated in Efficient Product Instal...
AI summary The document discusses the participation and satisfaction levels of the Efficient Product Installation program in 2017, noting a decrease in participants compared to previous years but a high level of satisfaction with the program's execution and installer interactions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary The on-site visits and unitary savings review resulted in no major changes to the values used to calculate the savings of Efficient Product Installation, with the exception of one product, the smart...
AI summary The evaluation of Efficient Product Installation found that the installation rate for smart power controllers remained low despite efforts to improve it. Free-ridership and internal spillover levels were established for LED lamps, with an overall weighted average NTGR of 0.92 for participants.
for owners and at 1 percent for tenants, resulting in an overall level of 6 percent. Overall, the weighted average NTGR for low-income and non-low-income participants combined was established at 0.92. Efficient Product Installation aimed t...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation program achieved 17.877 GWh in net energy savings and 2.129 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017, with high participant satisfaction. The program faces challenges due to declining potential for LED lamp installations. The Evaluator recommends improvements based on evaluation results.
hip at 61 percent. Based on the free-ridership and market effects levels established, the NTGRs for New Home Construction and the Passive House pilot were established at 1.06 and 0.39 respectively. Project No. 6138 47 Evaluation of 2017 DS...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2017 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia found that New Home Construction and the Passive House pilot achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, contributing to GHG emission reductions. The Evaluator recommends optimizing the program component based on the results.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary The level of satisfaction with Mail-in remains high for 2017, with participants rating it on average 9.0 on a 10-point scale. Participants were asked about specific aspects of Mail-in, namely intera...
AI summary Participant satisfaction with Mail-in remains high, with an average score of 9.0. Satisfaction with Instant Rebates is lower, averaging 6.5. Small adjustments were made to tracked energy savings, and free-ridership levels for Mail-in and Instant Rebates were measured at 14% and 27%, respectively.
d free-ridership levels for four LED product categories. Those products have a free-ridership level between 32 and 38 percent, while the overall free-ridership level for Instant Rebates is 27 percent. Business Energy Rebates aimed to achie...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates program achieved significant energy savings in 2017, exceeding its targets. Instant Rebates contributed notably, with high participation and increased unitary savings. The program also helped avoid 30,423 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emissions. The Evaluator recommends improvements based on the evaluation results.
Executive Summary Table 21: Recommendations for Business Energy Rebates No. Recommendations BER-R1. Continue to monitor the market evolution of LED lamps and adapt the BER offer when needed. The 2017 evaluation served to confirm solid mark...
AI summary The document recommends that ENS continue to monitor the evolution of the LED market, particularly as market barriers decrease and adoption increases. It suggests that ENS should remove certain product categories from the Business Energy Rebate program when market transformation reaches a high level, based on indicators such as retail prices and market share.
Moreover, one consultant and one participant, both with experience in using other efficiency programs elsewhere in Canada, described the ENS Retrofit service as exceptional in comparison to its peers. For Retrofit, the Evaluator’s review o...
AI summary The ENS Retrofit service was praised for its quality, but the evaluation found issues with M&V procedures and data documentation, leading to adjustments in energy savings calculations. Discrepancies in simulation models and errors in savings calculations were identified in New Construction and Building Optimization projects. Free-ridership was not measured for Retrofit in 2017 and was confirmed nil for Building Optimization.
, the Evaluator recommends that ENS continue to expand outreach efforts via BDM contacts with specific business groups in the industrial and agricultural sectors. Custom-R2. Continue conducting an in-depth review of energy models as part o...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends that ENS continue expanding outreach through BDM contacts with industrial and agricultural business groups and improve staff capacity to identify discrepancies in energy models, particularly in heat pump systems and baseline calculations, by providing tools and training.
Custom-R3. Establish clear objectives for Building Optimization. The Building Optimization projects reviewed this year differed widely in scope. Some projects involved detailed investigative work to tap into deep energy savings, while othe...
AI summary The document discusses the need to establish clear objectives for Building Optimization projects to ensure they provide the right level of support and maximize value. It highlights differences in project scope and the importance of distinguishing between routine repairs and true energy-saving opportunities.
e SBES team to seek assistance from the Custom Incentive Program’s personnel, who already have the skills and expertise needed for reviewing this type of project. SBES-R2. Closely monitor the new lighting application forms’ effectiveness t...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2017 DSM programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the need for improved monitoring of new lighting application forms and collaboration with the Custom Incentive Program to enhance project review processes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary No. Recommendations
AI summary The document provides an executive summary of Efficiency Nova Scotia, outlining key recommendations and initiatives related to energy efficiency programs and customer engagement strategies.
SBES-R3. Investigate new ways to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures to increase their share of savings and ultimately increase SBES’s total savings. Although SBES offers a wide variety of measures, lighting retrofits acc...
AI summary The SBES program needs to explore ways to encourage the implementation of non-lighting energy efficiency measures to increase overall savings. Currently, lighting retrofits account for most savings, but as the market becomes saturated, expanding into other measures is necessary. Educational materials and support for participants could help promote non-lighting upgrades.
included. The Evaluator recommends continuing to evaluate the impacts associated with lighting, street-lighting and building codes in 2018 since they provide significant savings. Project No. 6138 58 Evaluation of 2017 DSM Programs Efficien...
AI summary The document outlines the evaluation of 2017 DSM (Demand Side Management) programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including appendices such as a bibliography, calculation of margins of error, and NTGR calculations. The evaluation focuses on the impact of lighting, street-lighting, and building codes implemented in 2018, which are noted to provide significant energy savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document provides an executive summary and appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and programs. It outlines key findings, program performance, and impacts related to energy conservation and customer engagement.
APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Bibliographic References Components DEER, DEER2014 EUL Table, May 2014. ECOX. Technical Information Bulletin No. E-004-EN: SEER, www.ecoxline.com, (Last accessed March 3, 2016). ENERGY STAR. Program Requirem...
AI summary This appendix contains a bibliography of references related to energy efficiency programs, including technical documents, regulations, and studies on refrigerators, dehumidifiers, and air conditioners. These references support evaluations and standards for energy efficiency measures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary of an appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia, providing an overview of key findings and considerations related to energy efficiency initiatives and programs.
Program Bibliographic References Components AD HOC RECHERCHE. Rapport d’évaluation, Programme : Produits Mieux Consommer – Électroménagers Energy Star (Années 2008 et 2009). ADS ASSOCIÉS. Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des me...
AI summary The text provides a list of bibliographic references and research materials related to energy efficiency programs, including studies on appliance standards, energy savings, and technical reference manuals from various organizations and jurisdictions.
.energystar.gov/productfinder/product/certified-room-air-cleaners/ (Last accessed August 11, 2017). ENERGY STAR. Certified Residential Clothes Washers, https://www.energystar.gov/ productfinder/product/certified-clothes-washers/ (Last acce...
AI summary The text provides a list of ENERGY STAR product specifications and resources, including links to certified products, program requirements, and energy savings calculators. It also references academic and industry reports, such as the 'Diffusion of Innovations' by Everett Rogers and a report by GDS Associates on energy efficiency measures.
eport prepared for the England State Program Working Group, June 2007. INDEPENDENT ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATOR, IESO Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List, October 2015. ILLINOIS ENERGY EFFICIENCY STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY GROUP. Illinois...
AI summary The document includes a list of bibliographic references related to energy efficiency programs and technical manuals from various states and organizations, including Massachusetts, Illinois, and Rhode Island, as well as resources from the Lighting Research Center and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
, http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes-standards/products/6889 (Last accessed August 3, 2017). NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA. Search: Clothes Washers Energy Efficiency Ratings, http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/pml-lmp/index.cfm?action=app.sear...
AI summary The text contains a list of references and citations to various energy efficiency and regulatory documents, including studies, regulations, and tools related to energy efficiency programs and appliance standards.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary from an appendix report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, outlining key findings and summaries related to energy efficiency initiatives and programs in the region.
NEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY (NREL). The Uniform Methods Project, Chapter 23: Estimating Net Savings, Common Practices, September 2014. NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA. Air-Source Heat Pumps, Updated March 27, 2017, http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/pub...
AI summary The text provides a list of references and citations related to energy efficiency, heat pump technologies, and emissions reporting. It includes sources from organizations such as NREL, Natural Resources Canada, and Nova Scotia Power, along with technical manuals and research papers on energy efficiency and HVAC systems.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary from an appendix report related to Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines key points and findings from the report, though specific details are not provided in the excerpt.
Program Bibliographic References Components HAMELIN, M. C. ET AL. “Accounting for Real-Life Conditions in Mini-Split Heat Pump Savings: Findings from a Billing Analysis” in Proceedings of the 2017 International Energy Program Evaluation Co...
AI summary The text provides bibliographic references for a program analysis related to mini-split heat pump savings, energy conservation improvement programs, and technical reference manuals from various regulatory and research organizations.
4, 2017) PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION (PUC). Technical Reference Manual, Section 2.2 – HVAC, June 2015. PROVINCE OF NOVA SCOTIA, Nova Scotia Building Code Regulation, December 31, 2014. ROSENBURG M. AND HOEFGEN L. 2009. Market Ef...
AI summary The document text contains a list of references and citations related to energy efficiency programs, technical manuals, and regulations, including those from Nova Scotia, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Massachusetts, and other jurisdictions. These references include studies, manuals, and reports on energy efficiency measures, HVAC systems, and market transformation strategies.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary from an appendix report by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines key findings and considerations related to energy efficiency programs and initiatives in the region.
Program Bibliographic References Components ADS ASSOCIÉS, Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale, report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. Barclay, D., von Trapp, K. and Mizio...
AI summary The text provides a list of bibliographic references related to energy efficiency programs, including reports, presentations, and technical documents from various organizations and institutions, focusing on energy savings measures and evaluations.
Lighting Research Center. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Lighting Patterns for Homes. Light Bulb Features, www.lrc.rpi.edu/patternbook/resources/lamp_features.asp, Efficient (Last accessed January 24, 2018). Product Installation MASSACH...
AI summary The text includes references to various resources and regulations related to energy efficiency, including technical manuals, protocols, and regulatory documents from organizations such as the Lighting Research Center, Natural Resources Canada, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary of an appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia. It provides an overview of key findings and considerations related to energy efficiency initiatives in the region.
ournal, November 1993. Efficiency Valuation Organization, Core Concepts, International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol, October 2016. Energy EMERA INC., “Management’s Discussion & Analysis as at February 10, Management 20...
AI summary The text contains a list of references and citations related to energy efficiency, environmental reporting, and energy management systems, including documents from Nova Scotia Power, EMERA Inc., and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary from an appendix report related to Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines key points and findings from the report, likely concerning energy efficiency initiatives and programs in the province.
Program Bibliographic References Components ADS ASSOCIÉS. Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale, report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. CANETA RESEARCH. Performance Simulat...
AI summary The text provides a list of bibliographic references related to energy efficiency programs and studies, including reports on residential energy savings, street lighting strategies, and market assessments for energy-efficient technologies.
ttp://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes-standards/12342 (Last accessed February 5, 2018) NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA. Energy Efficiency Act: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, September 22, 2011, available at http:...
AI summary The document references multiple energy efficiency regulations and guidelines from Natural Resources Canada and Nova Scotia, highlighting legislative actions related to road lighting and energy efficiency standards. It also mentions an evaluation of 2017 DSM (Demand Side Management) programs by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
novascotiabuildingcoderegulation2.pdf (Last accessed February 29, 2018) NOVA SCOTIA POWER, Street and Area Lighting, available at http://www.nspower.ca/en/ home/about-us/electricity-rates-and-regulations/rates/street-and-area-lighting.aspx...
AI summary The document references several sources related to energy efficiency and lighting, including Nova Scotia Power's street and area lighting information, total system emissions reports, and studies on LED roadway lighting conducted by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Statistics Canada data on building permits is also cited.
2.35 1.64 5 2.78 2.13 1.53 10 2.26 1.83 1.38 15 2.14 1.76 1.35 20 2.09 1.73 1.33 25 2.06 1.71 1.32 30 2.05 1.70 1.31 ∞ 1.96 1.64 1.28 Coefficient z, which corresponds to the value of coefficient t for an infinite sample size, and is used f...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of a margin of error for program components, using a confidence level of 90 percent, a proportion of 0.50, and a total number of Efficient Product Installation non-low-income participants equal to 7,625, resulting in a margin of error of 8.2 percent. The calculation excludes Appliance Retirement, Custom, and EMIS due to lack of participant surveys or use of census-based approaches.
the weighted standard deviation. ∑ 0.085 ∑ Where N’ represents the on-site visits for which the number of tracked LED lamps was higher than zero. In the case of LED lamps, N is 110 and N’ is equal to 109. Calculation of the Margin of Error...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of the margin of error for LED lamps' installation rate and adjustment ratios for lighting measures under the Efficient Product Installation program. It outlines the formula used, the sample size, and the resulting margin of error of 1.3 percent.
e Margin of Error The margin of error of the free-ridership level of biomass and solar measures was established by using the following formula, which applies to samples drawn from a small population: 4.9% Project No. 6138 15 Evaluation of...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of the margin of error for free-ridership levels in biomass and solar measures, using a sample size of 16 and a population size of 86, resulting in a 4.9% margin of error. It also covers the methodology used to calculate the margin of error for measured energy consumption from mini-split heat pumps installed through Green Heat.
h Green Heat in fully electrically heated households. This methodology was applied to calculate the margins of error of metered results. Below are the steps followed to calculate this margin of error. Calculation of the Average of Unitary...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used to calculate the margin of error for unitary savings values in fully electrically heated households. It describes the calculation of the average, standard deviation, and margin of error for heat pump efficiency.
or factor in your decision to install 1 0 1 a [EQUIPMENT] in your home. (Agree or Disagree) CI2/4b. [Your previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency CI = IF(CI2a OR CI4a=Agree) + promotional materials distributed by E...
AI summary The text presents a series of statements related to customer participation in energy efficiency programs and their influence on decisions regarding home heating systems. It also includes a formula for calculating revised free-ridership based on customer responses.
fficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary and appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia, likely providing an overview of energy efficiency initiatives and related activities.
0% 7 30% you would have simply kept your old equipment instead of installing IF DK OR REF: FR3a = EMPTY energy-efficient equipment in your facility? (Scale 0 to 10) MEAN VALUE OF: PA1 Score - 0% - 35% - 35% (FR2ab ; FR3a) FR1. Before havin...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to energy efficiency upgrades and customer responses to the installation of such upgrades. It includes scoring metrics and conditional logic for evaluating responses to questions about prior plans for energy-efficient installations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report
AI summary The document is an executive summary and appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia, which likely outlines key findings, summaries, or supporting information related to energy efficiency initiatives in the province.
FR3b. [ASK IF TOTAL MEASURE QTY>1] If the audit, rebate and/or financing had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have FR3b = Answer x 10% NA - NA - NA - installed exactly the same quantity of energy-efficient upgrades t...
AI summary This text contains a series of questions related to the impact of an energy efficiency program on the installation of energy-efficient upgrades and the postponement of such upgrades. It includes scoring and inconsistency tests based on responses to these questions.
PA2 = EMPTY IF PA4 < MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3): MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3; PA4) Free-ridership - 3% - 38% - 20% OTHERWISE MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [The company’s previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materia...
AI summary The text presents a calculation method for free-ridership and includes survey questions related to the impact of ENS programs and promotional materials on company decisions to install energy-efficient upgrades and conduct energy audits. The questions assess whether the company's participation in ENS programs influenced their evaluation of energy efficiency options.
1 - 1 - 1 - IF 2. No OR DK OR REF: FR3a = 0% Consortium or ENERGY STAR® FR3a. [ASK IF FR3d=1] If the program rebate or financing had not been offered, FR3a =Answer x 10% what is the likelihood that you would have installed the exact same m...
AI summary The text presents a survey or assessment tool related to the likelihood of installing energy-efficient lighting products without a rebate or financing option, and includes scoring mechanisms such as PA1 Score and FR3a. It also references the SBES program and energy-efficient lighting systems.
- 3% - 100% - 18% OTHERWISE MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [The company’s previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] was a major factor in your 1 0 1 decision to install energy...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions to assess the impact of ENS programs and promotional materials on a company's decision-making regarding energy efficiency upgrades. It asks respondents to agree or disagree with statements about whether ENS programs influenced their decisions, prompted energy audits, or affected cost-effectiveness evaluations.
1 - 1 - 2 0% HVAC system before learning about the SBES program? IF 2. No OR DK OR REF: FR1 = 0% FR1a. [ASK IF FR1=1] I just want to make sure I understand - Before you learned about the SBES program and the rebates offered through the pro...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question related to whether respondents had already decided to install energy-efficient HVAC upgrades before learning about the SBES program and its rebates, with responses categorized under FR1 and PA2 Score.
0% upgrades? PA2 Score FR1 - 100% - 0% - 0% FR4. Level of influence– 5 factors (Scale 0 to 10) FR4 = MAX(a; b; c; d; e) - 10 - 3 - 10 a. [ASK IF REBATE=YES] The program rebate - 10 - 0 - 8 - b.[IF FINANCING =YES] The program on-bill financ...
AI summary The text presents a scoring framework related to energy efficiency programs, evaluating factors such as rebate influence, financing, information provided, and contractor availability. It calculates PA2 and PA3 scores based on these factors, with FR4 being a key determinant.
e Network PA3 Score (10 − FR4) × 10% - 0% - 70% - 0% Project No. 6138 26 Evaluation of 2017 DSM Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Executive Summary – Appendix Report FR3c. [ASK IF FR2 a or b ≥5] If the program rebate or financing had not bee...
AI summary The text presents a scoring framework for evaluating the impact of energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the likelihood of delayed HVAC upgrades if rebates or financing were not available. It includes a scoring calculation for FR3c based on a scale from 0 to 10.
OTHERWISE MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [The company’s previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] was a major factor in your 1 0 1 decision to install energy efficient upgrades...
AI summary The text presents survey questions assessing the impact of ENS programs and promotional materials on a company's decision-making regarding energy efficiency upgrades. The questions focus on whether ENS initiatives influenced the company's decisions to install upgrades, conduct energy audits, and consider cost-effectiveness of energy-efficient options.
Example participant (none with Spillover Algorithm spillover this year) Calculation Algorithm Calculation Questions Answer Result SO1. Have you installed additional energy efficiency measures other IF 1. Yes: CONTINUE 1 - than those implem...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to energy efficiency measures and financing, asking participants if they have installed additional measures outside the program and whether they received or plan to receive financing from other agencies. It also requests a description of these additional measures and their associated energy savings.
0% NTGR calculation NTGR = 1-FRtotal+SOtotal NTGR= 88% Project No. 6138 28 160, rue Saint-Paul, bureau 200, Québec (Québec) G1K 3W1 CANADA / Tel.: 1-418-692-2592 Fax: 1-418-692-4899 www.econoler.com RESIDENTIAL EFFICIENT PRODUCT REBATES PR...
AI summary This document outlines the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Evaluation Report. It provides a final report on the program's performance and includes abbreviations used in the evaluation.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. The ratio of evaluated results to tracked results. This ratio expresses the Adjustment ratio adjustment made to tracked savings or other tracked values such as...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and measurement, including accuracy, adjustment ratio, base case, bias, billing calibration, confidence interval, displaced wattage, and EnerGuide rating. These terms are relevant to energy performance assessments and benchmarking.
rgy savings. This value takes into account variations in useful life annual energy savings throughout the effective useful life due to increased baselines. Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program iv Residential Efficient Product Reba...
AI summary The document discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program and references the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on energy savings and variations in useful life and annual energy savings.
Gross and net savings calculated by the Evaluator using the parameters (unitary savings values, installation rates, interactive effects, net-to-gross Evaluated savings ratio, etc.) validated or measured during the evaluation process. Unles...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency program evaluations, including gross and net savings, free-ridership, induced consumption, and interactive effects. It outlines the evaluation process and the parameters used to calculate energy savings.
duct ................................................................ 100 Table 65: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED A-Type Lamps Replaced Early .....................................................................
AI summary The document outlines the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) Evaluation Report, focusing on the replacement of LED A-Type lamps and their effective useful life calculations.
Table 1: Overall Participation and Savings for Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings ARet Energy Savings 5.266 GWh 0.59 3.094 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 1 6,138 appliances 40.321 GWh 0.57...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing the participation levels and savings from residential efficient product rebate programs, including the Appliance Retirement (ARet) initiative. ARet encourages the retirement of inefficient appliances by offering financial incentives and free pick-ups, aiming to reduce energy consumption and promote energy efficiency in Nova Scotia.
fered through ARet: › $30 for each retired refrigerator › $30 for each retired freezer › $10 for each retired air conditioner › $10 for each retired small refrigerator or freezer 1 Throughout this report, energy savings always refer to fir...
AI summary The document outlines the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program, which provides rebates for retiring inefficient appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners. It also discusses the 2017 evaluation of the program, which included a review of documentation, interviews, and facility visits.
review, an interview with the program manager, three visits to the recycling facility, an interview with a representative of the HRSB and a unitary savings review. ARet Key Findings ARet Performance ARet aimed to achieve 2.6 GWh in net ene...
AI summary The ARet program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2017, retiring over 5,700 inefficient appliances and contributing to GHG emission reductions. The program's performance was evaluated through various methods, including interviews and facility visits, with results showing higher-than-targeted savings.
Refrigerators 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Dehumidifiers were removed from ARet after 2011. Net Savings at the Generator 8,0 7.175 5.986 Peak Demand Savings (MW) 6,0 Energy Savings (GWh) 3.841 4,0 4.059 3.002 3.094 2.722 2,0 1.144 0....
AI summary The text presents a table and graph showing energy savings and peak demand savings from appliance retirement (ARET) programs between 2011 and 2017, with dehumidifiers removed from the program after 2011. The data includes metrics such as Net Savings at the Generator and Energy Savings in GWh.
0.443 0.363 0,0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ARet Energy Savings As part of the 2017 ARet evaluation, the Evaluator reviewed the metering protocol and improved it notably by measuring the interior temperature of appliances and by usi...
AI summary The 2017 ARet evaluation improved the metering protocol by measuring appliance temperatures and using new tools. Despite improvements, error margins were higher due to insufficient sample size and unusable data. Energy consumption values for retired appliances remained similar to 2016, except for older freezers.
e pilot. The impact evaluation revealed that ARet generated 3.094 GWh in net energy savings and 0.443 MW in net peak demand savings respectively at the generator in 2017, as summarized in Table 3. Residential Efficient Product Rebates Prog...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program showed that it achieved 3.094 GWh in net energy savings and 0.443 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017. These figures are higher than the tracked savings due to increased unitary savings values from retired freezers and dehumidifiers.
igher than the tracked net peak demand savings, which is attributable to the higher revised energy savings and the increase in the peak-demand- to-energy ratio for dehumidifiers (from 0.000 to 0.335). ARet Recommendations ARet continues to...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARet) program continues to achieve significant participation and savings, even after several years in the market. The program is effective in encouraging the retirement of inefficient appliances and educating participants on the costs of maintaining old appliances. The Evaluator provides additional recommendations for improving ARet, which are detailed in Appendix I.
e power factor of each appliance type and measuring old appliances’ inside temperature at the time of pick-up, as recommended in the Metering Review section of this report. 2017 ARet-R2. Improve the process for tracking appliances retired...
AI summary The document discusses improvements to the ARET pilot process, including tracking retired appliances with specific parameters and using unitary savings values. It also covers the Instant Savings program, which provides rebates for energy-efficient products and tested new indoor air quality products during the fall 2017 campaign.
ings was based on a program component documentation review, interviews with eight retailers, an intercept survey of 100 participants conducted during the fall campaign and a unitary savings review. Residential Efficient Product Rebates Pro...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Instant Savings program's performance, achieving 19.543 GWh in net energy savings and 2.558 MW in net peak demand savings. The report also notes a decrease in LED lamp sales due to the introduction of a price floor, though sales remained higher than previous years.
floor to prevent retailers from selling LEDs at very low prices, a situation that had resulted in extraordinary sales in 2016. However, 2017 sales are still much higher than any other previous year. Net energy savings generated by Instant...
AI summary The text discusses the performance of the Instant Savings program from 2011 to 2017, highlighting increased product sales in 2016 and 2017, particularly for LEDs, and a decrease in net energy savings in 2017 due to lower sales and a reduction in spillover levels.
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Net Energy Savings (GWh) CFLs LEDs Other Products Net Peak Demand Savings (MW) Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program xviii Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights varying levels of satisfaction with the Instant Savings program among retailers, with some frustration over the product price floor. Retailers generally had positive relationships with the DA and noted that the program influenced LED lamp stocking. Cost and knowledge gaps were identified as barriers to LED adoption.
tified cost as the main barrier, while three retailers believe that insufficient knowledge now trumps price as the key barrier to LED adoption. This is a first in the history of the program component. Similarly to 2016, the intercept parti...
AI summary The document discusses barriers to LED adoption, marketing methods for the Instant Savings program, and the evaluation of energy savings. It notes a shift in barriers from cost to knowledge and highlights the use of NTGR to measure net energy savings, including free-ridership and spillover effects.
participant survey, the LED unitary savings adjustment resulted mainly from the decreasing number of participants replacing incandescent lamps in favor of compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) and LED lamps. The evaluated net peak demand savings...
AI summary The evaluation of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program highlights a decrease in participant replacement of incandescent lamps with LEDs and CFLs, leading to lower net peak demand savings. Market saturation of LED lamps in Nova Scotia is noted, with A-type LEDs being the dominant type in shipments.
s had at least one LED lamp in 2016. In 2017, LED lamp shipments accounted for approximately one third of all lamps shipped in Atlantic Canada, among which A-types remained the dominant LED lamp type. LED lamps are available at major retai...
AI summary The text discusses the increasing adoption of LED lamps in Nova Scotia, noting the growth in shipments, declining prices, and reduced barriers to purchase. It also highlights the effectiveness of the Instant Savings program and mentions a 2016 socket study indicating LED adoption trends. An upcoming update to Canadian energy efficiency regulations may further promote LED use.
nstant Savings. These recommendations are also presented in Appendix I. 2 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2016 Socket Study, Final Report Prepared for Efficiency Nova Scotia, December 2016. Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program...
AI summary The document discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, referencing a 2016 Socket Study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. and the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It outlines the evaluation of demand-side management initiatives.
included in a periodic Omnibus survey. An Omnibus survey is a cost-effective method where data on a wide variety of subjects is collected during the same interview. Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program xxii Residential Efficient P...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is responsible for designing and delivering energy efficiency programs, funded by Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia. Econoler was commissioned to evaluate ENS’s 2017 demand-side management (DSM) program portfolio and assess the impact of energy efficiency codes and standards in Nova Scotia.
fficiency codes and standards introduced in Nova Scotia. To carry out this assignment, Econoler collaborated with Research Into Action, Equilibrium Engineering and Corporate Research Associates (CRA). Econoler served as team leader in the...
AI summary Econoler led a 2017 evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, collaborating with multiple organizations. The evaluation included impact assessments, process evaluations, and data collection, resulting in reports on energy savings and GHG emissions. Table 6 outlines the programs assessed and the types of evaluations conducted.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement C C R Product Rebates Program Instant Savings C C R R Home Energy Assessment C C C C Existing Residential Green Heat C C C C C Program Efficient Product Installation C C C C New Residential Progra...
AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business appliance rebates, home energy assessments, and custom incentive programs. It mentions the Retrofit service under the Custom program and notes the start date of the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort.
tions The process evaluation specifically targets the Retrofit service of the Custom program component. Due to the start date of the latest Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, SEM did not have any participants who achieved savings in...
AI summary The document evaluates the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, focusing on the Appliance Retirement (ARET) component. It outlines the program's purpose, which is to retire inefficient household appliances and provide financial incentives. The evaluation follows up on 2016 recommendations and provides an overview of participation history.
educates Nova Scotians about the cost of maintaining old and inefficient appliances, provides free pick-up from their homes (not from the roadside) and offers a financial incentive for the retirement. In addition to removing old appliances...
AI summary The ARet program educates Nova Scotians about the cost of maintaining old appliances, offers free pick-up and financial incentives for retiring them, and ensures proper recycling. Eligibility criteria and rebate amounts are outlined, with specific conditions for appliance sizes and ages.
offered through ARet: › $30 for each retired refrigerator › $30 for each retired freezer › $10 for each retired air conditioner › $10 for each retired small refrigerator or freezer Appliance Retirement 3 Residential Efficient Product Rebat...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARET) program offers rebates for retiring inefficient appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners. The program is administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and includes a pilot project with the Halifax Regional School Board (HRSB) to retire or replace old appliances in schools.
continues to work with representatives of the HRSB to retire appliances and, where necessary, replace inefficient refrigerators and freezers from school properties. The pilot includes three elements: › The removal of privately owned applia...
AI summary The document outlines the Appliance Retirement (ARet) Pilot program, which involves retiring inefficient appliances in school properties and offering incentives for participants. It also mentions the implementation status of recommendations from the 2016 evaluation report, including the continuation of metering activities to improve quality and effectiveness.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report To implement this recommendation, a new round of metering was performed on full-sized appliances in 2017 and allowed for including more recent appliances in the metering sample. The last ti...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia conducted a new round of metering on full-sized appliances in 2017, expanding eligibility for ARet to include appliances 10 years or older. Metering protocols were improved for accuracy, and participation in appliance retirement programs remained stable in 2017.
h ARet, the pilot and HomeWarming, as summarized in Figure 3 below. The total number of appliances retired in 2017 was less than 2 percent higher than in 2016, showing a stable level of participation. As a result of a bigger number of appl...
AI summary The document discusses the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program's performance in 2017, highlighting stable participation levels and increased energy savings. It notes that the number of retired appliances has remained steady since 2015, and the program remains effective in retiring inefficient appliances despite a diminishing stock of older appliances.
Air Conditioners 4,000 Dehumidifiers 2,000 Freezers ,0 Refrigerators 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Dehumidifiers were removed from ARet after 2011. Figure 4: Summary of Gross Savings for ARet, 2011-2017 Gross Energy Savings (GWh) Gros...
AI summary The text presents graphical data showing the number of air conditioners, dehumidifiers, freezers, and refrigerators retired under the Appliance Replacement and Conservation Assistance (ARet) program from 2011 to 2017, along with the associated gross energy and peak demand savings.
able, no participant survey was conducted in 2017 and the 2016 survey results were used to establish the free-ridership level, secondary market impacts and induced consumption and the associated NTGR. For HomeWarming, the data collected in...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) involved a literature review of technical reference manuals and evaluation reports to assess effective useful life (EUL) values used for calculating energy savings. Free-ridership levels and energy consumption differences were analyzed using data from surveys and appliance retirement programs.
ors. Special care was taken to ensure that the cable for the internal temperature probe did not affect the seal on the appliance, and, where necessary, tape was used to seal any gaps around the cable. Because of several small technical del...
AI summary The document discusses technical adjustments made during appliance metering, including the use of HOBO® loggers and internal temperature profiles to ensure accurate data collection and appliance functionality verification. The process involved adjusting metering periods due to technical delays and the introduction of new logging equipment.
› Temperatures not maintained: Some files or records were screened out because, although the appliances of these samples reached an operating temperature within the acceptable ranges, their compressors did not cycle again in the sampling p...
AI summary Some appliances were excluded from the analysis due to temperature not being maintained and refrigerant losses. These issues may have occurred during transportation or due to compressor failure, making it impossible to accurately assess their performance.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Since the appliances identified as non-working represented 23 percent of all the metered units, verification of old appliances’ working condition at the time of pick-up should be improved t...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights the need for improved verification of appliance functionality during pick-up, suggesting methods like temperature measurement and in-situ metering for more accurate energy consumption analysis. However, these methods may be cost-ineffective for the Appliance Retirement program due to its limited scale.
is more expensive than the current metering approach and may not be considered cost- effective for ARet because of this program component’s limited size. Average Energy Consumption Analysis The Evaluator first calculated each appliance’s a...
AI summary The analysis compares the average energy consumption of refrigerators and freezers across different age categories. It notes that the energy consumption of freezers from 1995 and later is significantly lower than those from 1994 and earlier. The study also combines two categories due to a negligible difference in energy consumption and a high margin of error.
reezers 1994 and earlier 117.8 kWh/cu. ft 12 21.4% 1995 and later 56.2 kWh/cu. ft 23 19.3% Appliance Retirement 15 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The changes made to the mete...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses changes to metering protocols that improved data quality and allowed for better identification of unusable data. Despite a smaller-than-expected sample leading to high margins of error, the Evaluator used the 2017 results due to more complete data. The report notes that newer refrigerators (2002 and later) consume more energy than older models, possibly due to larger freezer compartments and additional features.
ings of full-sized refrigerators retired through ARet in 2017. The calculations of the gross unitary savings are first described, followed by the net unitary savings. Gross Unitary Savings The Evaluator revised the gross unitary savings va...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of gross unitary savings for refrigerators retired through the Appliance Retirement program in 2017. Key parameters updated include average energy consumption of retired and replacement refrigerators, as well as part-use factors. Refrigerators were classified by manufacture year based on energy-efficiency regulations introduced in 1994 and 2001.
n Report By applying this occupant adjustment factor of 1.12, the average annual energy consumption value is established at 927 kWh per year. Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Refrigerators The average annual energy consumption of...
AI summary The report discusses the application of an occupant adjustment factor to determine average annual energy consumption at 927 kWh per year. It also outlines the categorization of replacement refrigerators into new and used, with high and standard efficiency levels, and assigns energy consumption levels based on the UMP methodology.
New New - Efficient New - Standard Used New - Standard Used – Standard The “New - Efficient” energy consumption has been established by multiplying (1) the average per- cubic-foot energy consumption of refrigerators sold through Instant Sa...
AI summary The 'New - Efficient' energy consumption is calculated using the average energy consumption of refrigerators sold through the Instant Savings program in 2017. The 'New - Standard' value is based on updated Canadian energy-efficiency regulations effective June 2017. A weighted average of the old and new regulation values was applied for the year 2017.
ova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 15: The Average Annual Consumption Values per Cubic Foot Proportion of Average Annual Retirement Period Refrigerators Retired Consumption per Cubic Foot After June 1, 2017 74% 23.1 kWh/cu. ft. Be...
AI summary The document presents data on refrigerator energy consumption before and after June 1, 2017, including average annual consumption values per cubic foot and by replacement category. It uses survey data to establish the average annual energy consumption for replacement refrigerators.
sumption value of replacement refrigerators has been established at 391 kWh per year, as summarized in Table 17 below. Table 17: Average Annual Consumption for Refrigerator Replacement Annual Energy Consumption Type of Replacement Proporti...
AI summary The document discusses the average annual energy consumption of replacement refrigerators, including part-use factors that adjust savings calculations for refrigerators not used year-round. It highlights the distribution of different refrigerator types and their energy consumption, with a focus on efficiency improvements.
to be unplugged over certain periods of the year and since they were eligible for the program component, their savings were calculated and an overall part-use factor was applied in these calculations. The 2016 participant survey data was u...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from refrigerator replacements in a demand-side management program. It uses a part-use factor of 0.81 derived from survey data, leading to estimated annual energy consumption values for both retired and replacement refrigerators. Net unitary savings are calculated by considering free-ridership, secondary market impacts, and induced consumption.
37% 0 0 0 100% Weighted Average (kWh/unit) 420 Induced Consumption Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Induced Replaced ARet-induced Overall % % Consumption Recycled Unit Replacement Proportion kWh Without ARet With ARet Yes 4% 3% 0 317 317 Yes...
AI summary The text presents data on energy consumption related to appliance replacement and induced consumption, showing the impact of appliance retirement (ARet) on energy usage. It includes percentages of replaced units, induced consumption, and weighted average energy consumption in kWh per unit.
s Canada, Registration and publication of Regulations Amending Canada’s Energy Efficiency Regulations, http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes-standards/6965 (Last accessed December 6, 2017) Appliance Retirement 24 Residential Effi...
AI summary The report calculates the average annual energy consumption of retired freezers in Nova Scotia in 2017, using an average size of 13 cubic feet and applying an occupant adjustment factor of 1.12, resulting in an average annual consumption of 1,150 kWh. It also outlines energy consumption levels for replacement freezers.
Annual Energy Consumption Type of Replacement Proportion (kWh/yr) New High Efficiency Freezer 278 88% Used High Efficiency Freezer 309 8% New Standard Efficiency Freezer 309 0% Used Standard Efficiency Freezer 818 4% Average Annual Consump...
AI summary The document presents annual energy consumption data for different types of freezers, showing that new high efficiency freezers consume significantly less energy than standard or used models. A part-use factor of 0.75 was calculated based on participant responses, and this factor was used to adjust the energy consumption values for both retired and replacement freezers.
an Alternative Type Proportion Unit Without ARet With ARet Net Reduction Yes 45% 45% 863 0 863 Old Unit 50% 4% 863 863 0 Yes 50% Transferred 26% New Unit 50% 4% 863 227 636 No 55% No 50% 7% 863 0 863 Disposed of 74% 40% 0 0 0 Weighted Aver...
AI summary The text presents a table showing the impact of an appliance retirement (ARET) program on energy consumption, comparing scenarios with and without the program. It includes metrics such as proportion, unit data, and net reduction in energy usage.
474 (kWh/unit) Induced Consumption Energy Consumption Induced Replaced the ARet-induced Overall (kWh/year) % % Consumption Recycled Unit Replacement Proportion kWh Without ARet With ARet
AI summary The text presents a table comparing energy consumption before and after appliance replacement under the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, highlighting induced consumption and overall energy consumption metrics in kWh/year.
kWh Without ARet With ARet Yes 6% 4% 0 227 227 Yes 73% No 94% 69% 227 227 0 No 27% 27% 0 0 0 Weighted Average 100% 9 (kWh/unit) Overall Savings (kWh/unit) 465 Appliance Retirement 28 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency...
AI summary This section discusses the methodology and calculations used to evaluate the unitary savings of room air conditioners retired in 2017 under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
mption of Retired Room Air Conditioners The Evaluator reviewed the assumptions used by ENS for the calculation of the average energy consumption of replaced room air conditioners. Hours of Operation In the 2016 evaluation, the Evaluator us...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed ENS's assumptions for calculating the average energy consumption of replaced room air conditioners, relying on data from NRCan's 2003 study due to the lack of recent metering studies. This information was used in the 2016 evaluation and continues to be used in the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
hours of operation have been established at 312 hours. Capacity With the information available in the tracking system, the retired units’ average capacity has been established at 6,146 Btu/hr. SEER The 2017 ARet tracking report showed that...
AI summary The document calculates the average annual energy consumption of retired room air conditioners based on hours of operation, capacity, and SEER. It uses data from the 2017 ARet tracking report and references technical information from Ecox and NRCan.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Room Air Conditioners The Evaluator assumes that the replacement units meet the current minimum level of energy efficiency required to meet ENERGY...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the average energy consumption of replacement room air conditioners, assuming they meet ENERGY STAR efficiency levels. It calculates annual energy consumption and net unitary savings, considering factors like free-ridership and secondary market impacts.
60% 0 0 0 100% Weighted average (kWh/unit) 66 Induced Consumption Energy Consumption Induced Replaced the ARet-induced Overall (kWh/year) % % Consumption Recycled Unit Replacement Proportion kWh Without ARet With ARet Yes 0% 0% 0 155 155 Y...
AI summary The table presents data on energy consumption and savings related to appliance replacement, specifically focusing on the impact of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program. It compares energy consumption with and without ARet, showing induced consumption and overall savings in kilowatt-hours per unit.
on the proportion accounted for by the retired small refrigerators in the 2017 tracking system. As a result, the average consumption value was established at 49.3 kWh/cu. ft as presented in Table 26. Table 26: Average Annual Consumption of...
AI summary The document calculates the average annual consumption of retired small refrigerators in 2017, using data from the tracking system. It establishes an average consumption value of 49.3 kWh per cubic foot and multiplies it by the average size of the refrigerators (6 cubic feet) to arrive at an average annual consumption of 296 kWh.
erage volume of small refrigerators and freezers. For replacement small refrigerators, the average annual energy consumption value was established at 125 kWh using the following calculation equation: 354 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑅...
AI summary The document calculates the average annual energy consumption for replacement small refrigerators and freezers using specific equations. It also introduces a part-use factor of 0.63, derived from 2016 survey data, to adjust energy consumption values for appliances before and after retirement.
Consumption Factor (kWh/year) (kWh/year) Retired Small Refrigerators 332 0.63 209 Replacement Small Refrigerators 125 0.63 79 Retired Small Freezers 519 0.63 327 Replacement Small Freezers 150 0.63 95 Net Unitary Savings To calculate the n...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of net savings from the retirement of small refrigerators and freezers under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program. It considers factors such as free-ridership, secondary market impacts, and induced consumption, using survey data from 2016 to determine these effects.
er of participants in this category of appliance and thus the smaller sample of respondents in the survey, small refrigerators and small freezers were analyzed together in the net savings calculation. Table 29 and Table 30 present the unit...
AI summary The analysis discusses the calculation of unitary savings values for small refrigerators and freezers retired through the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program, taking into account free-ridership and secondary market impacts. The results are presented in tables, with the first section showing unitary savings values after deductions and the second section showing induced consumption.
44% 0 0 0 100% Weighted average (kWh/unit) 103 Induced Consumption Energy Consumption Induced Replaced the ARet-induced Overall (kWh/year) % % Consumption Recycled Unit Replacement Proportion kWh Without ARet With ARet
AI summary The table presents data on energy consumption, including induced consumption and energy consumption before and after appliance retirement (ARET). It includes metrics such as weighted average kWh/unit and the proportion of replaced units.
kWh Without ARet With ARet Yes 0% 0% 0 79 79 Yes 25% No 100% 25% 79 79 0 No 75% 75% 0 0 0 100% Weighted Average (kWh/unit) 0 Overall Savings (kWh/unit) 103 Appliance Retirement 37 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency No...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of Appliance Retirement (ARET) on energy savings, comparing scenarios with and without ARET. It references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report and mentions a table analyzing net savings per small freezer, as well as free-ridership and secondary market impacts.
ion Report Table 30: Net Savings per Small Freezer Free-ridership and Secondary Market Impacts Energy Consumption Would-be Savings Would Have Discard Alternative Overall (kWh/year) % % Acquirer Finds an % % Kept the Unit Scenario Type Prop...
AI summary The table presents net savings per small freezer under different scenarios, including free-ridership and secondary market impacts. It shows energy consumption savings with and without the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program, highlighting the impact of unit replacement on energy efficiency.
44% 0 0 0 100% Weighted average (kWh/unit) 162 Induced Consumption Energy Consumption Induced Replaced the ARet-induced Overall (kWh/year) % % Consumption Recycled Unit Replacement Proportion kWh Without ARet With ARet Yes 0% 0% 0 95 95 Ye...
AI summary The text presents a table analyzing the impact of Appliance Retirement (ARET) on energy consumption. It shows that replacing appliances leads to energy savings, with a weighted average of 162 kWh/unit saved, while induced consumption remains unchanged at 95 kWh.
100% Weighted Average (kWh/unit) 0 Overall Savings (kWh/unit) 162 Appliance Retirement 38 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3.7 Appliances Retired through the Pilot This subsect...
AI summary This section discusses the methodology used to calculate the gross unitary savings of refrigerators and freezers retired through the 2017 ARet pilot project. It outlines the use of average metered annual consumption data to determine the average annual consumption of retired appliances.
earlier 117.8 0% Average Annual Consumption 56.2 kWh/cu. ft. Appliance Retirement 39 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The average size of the refrigerators retired through the...
AI summary The document evaluates the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It provides details on the average size and energy consumption of retired appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, and small refrigerators, and explains the methodology used to calculate their annual consumption.
usage conditions, the Evaluator applied a factor of 1.00 since it is assumed that all appliances retired so far through the pilot were rarely used since they were considered at as surplus appliances. According to the HRSB representative in...
AI summary The evaluation of the appliance retirement pilot program applied a part-use factor of 1.00 to retired appliances, assuming they were rarely used. Interviews with HRSB representatives confirmed that retired appliances were found plugged in, supporting the use of this factor. The report also discusses free-ridership assessment and the roles of HRSB and school principals in the pilot's implementation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The interview revealed that the audit of all the refrigeration appliances in HRSB schools was the main activity enabling the HRSB to first identify the appliances to be retired and then ret...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the role of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Appliance Retirement (ARET) in facilitating the retirement of refrigeration appliances in HRSB schools. ENS's support and resources were critical in enabling the process, leading to a free-ridership level of 0% for the ARet pilot. The report also outlines the methodology for calculating savings from appliance replacements through the HomeWarming program.
. Based on the nature of the HomeWarming program component (direct replacement) and its participant demographics, an NTGR of 1.00 has been assumed. Refrigerator Replacement Tracked Savings For the replacement of refrigerators through HomeW...
AI summary The HomeWarming program assumes an NTGR of 1.00 due to its direct replacement nature and participant demographics. Refrigerator replacements through the program use a unitary savings value of 938 kWh per year, based on data from appliance retirements in 2015 and new ENERGY STAR certified refrigerators installed in 2016.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The HomeWarming guidelines indicate that refrigerators eligible for a replacement through the program component must be manufactured in 1990 or earlier. Therefore, the tracked savings value...
AI summary This section of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the calculation of energy savings from the HomeWarming Program. It outlines how energy consumption values for old and new refrigerators were determined and used to calculate unitary savings.
as established at 332 kWh. By applying the average consumption values established for the old and new refrigerators, the tracked unitary savings were established at 938 kWh per year. Revised Savings The Evaluator used the average annual co...
AI summary The document calculates revised unitary savings for refrigerators by comparing the average annual consumption of old and new models. The old refrigerators consumed 1,055 kWh per year, while new ENERGY STAR certified models consumed 350 kWh per year, resulting in a unitary savings of 705 kWh per year. This differs from previous calculations due to updated metering data.
actured in 1994 and earlier at 58.9 kWh/cu.ft, in comparison to the value of 70.9 kWh/cu.ft used in 2016, which was the average consumption level for retired refrigerators manufactured before 1990. Appliance Retirement 42 Residential Effic...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings from replacing old freezers with new efficient models under the HomeWarming Program. It outlines the tracked savings based on average consumption levels of retired and new freezers, using data from the 2015 and 2016 tracking systems.
placement freezers installed in 2016 was established at 247 kWh. Therefore, replacing an old freezer with a new efficient model results in tracked unitary savings of 492 kWh per year. Revised Savings The Evaluator used the average annual c...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from replacing old freezers with new efficient models under the HomeWarming Program. It calculates unitary savings based on average consumption data from 2016 and 2017, noting that ENERGY STAR certified models were limited in size and availability.
HomeWarming. For the replacement of existing dehumidifiers, ENS used a unitary savings value of 633 kWh per year for each installed product based on the 2016 ARet evaluation report. Revised Savings The Evaluator reviewed the tracked unitar...
AI summary The document discusses the revision of unitary savings values for dehumidifiers under the HomeWarming program, based on updated ENERGY STAR Program Requirements and a literature review of other jurisdictions' methodologies.
y now need to have an Energy Factor of 2.00 L/kWh or higher. This new value was therefore used by the Evaluator to revise the unitary savings of dehumidifiers installed through HomeWarming in 2017. 24 ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for D...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings from replacing old dehumidifiers with new, more energy-efficient models under the HomeWarming Program. The new Energy Factor of 2.00 L/kWh was used to revise savings estimates, while old units were based on 2011 Ontario Power Authority data. Replacing old models results in 660 kWh/year in savings.
pliance-Fridge Air conditioner 0.000 Calculated by the Evaluator Dehumidifier 0.335 RES-Appliance-Dehumidifier 3.11 Interactive Effects Interactive effects occur in a conditioned space when an implemented energy-efficiency measure has an i...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of appliance retirement on heating and cooling loads in Nova Scotia. Retiring inefficient appliances increases winter heating loads and decreases summer cooling loads, leading to potential reductions in overall energy savings due to these effects.
useholds and the Environment Survey, air conditioners, Canada, provinces and census metropolitan areas, 2013, CANSIM, March 10, 2015. 28 RETScreen, Climatic Data for Halifax International Airport. Appliance Retirement 47 Residential Effici...
AI summary The document discusses the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of appliances retired through the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program. It explains that the EUL of ARet savings corresponds to the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the retired appliances, as the savings are attributed to the removal of these appliances from the electrical grid.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Therefore, for appliances replaced through HomeWarming, their equivalent EUL was calculated by taking into account different energy savings values during the RUL and the rest of the equipme...
AI summary This report evaluates the energy savings from the HomeWarming Program, which replaces appliances in low-income households. It calculates the Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) by considering energy savings during the Replacement Useful Life (RUL) and the remaining equipment life, assuming participants would purchase appliances meeting current minimum standards.
umption values for new standard refrigerator and freezer units were taken respectively from Section 3.3.1 and 3.4.1, while the new standard dehumidifier’s consumption value comes from Instant Savings. The Evaluator used an RUL of four year...
AI summary The document discusses the assumption values for new standard refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifier units, citing specific sections and the Instant Savings program. It outlines the RUL for appliances replaced through HomeWarming, comparing it to those retired through ARet, and references Table 37 for equipment life and RUL values.
Reference New Appliance Retired EUL Equipment Life Appliance RUL32 ENERGY STAR Calculator, Appliance Refrigerator 12 12 4 Magazine Market Research Report, Replacement value for refrigerators Freezer ENERGY STAR Calculator, EPA 12 12 4 Repl...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for appliances replaced through the HomeWarming Program, referencing ENERGY STAR and EPA research for refrigerators, freezers, and dehumidifiers. It also notes that Replacement Useful Life (RUL) values are assumed to be one-third of EUL values based on common assumptions in TRMs.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 38: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculations for Appliances Replaced through HomeWarming Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Lifetime Equivalent Appliance First 4 Years Following 8 Years Savings EUL (kWh) (y...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report includes tables detailing energy consumption and equivalent effective useful life (EUL) calculations for appliances replaced through the HomeWarming program. These calculations help assess the energy savings from appliance replacements and retirements.
Appliance Revised Equivalent EUL Lifetime Gross Energy (Years) Savings per Unit (kWh) Refrigerator Retirement – ARet 8 6,008 Freezer Retirement – ARet 8 6,904 Air Conditioner Retirement – ARet 3 645 Small Refrigerator Retirement – ARet 8 1...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings from appliance retirement and replacement programs, including the HomeWarming Program, and references an evaluation report on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3.13 Overall Gross Savings The gross energy and peak demand savings resulting from the retirement of old appliances and small appliances through ARet and the pilot, and the appliance replac...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia details gross energy and peak demand savings from appliance retirement programs (ARET) and the HomeWarming Program. Total gross energy savings were 5.266 GWh and 0.740 MW, with line-loss factors applied based on participant rate codes provided by Nova Scotia Power.
099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.438 0.217 0.000 0.002 0.002 Appliance Retirement 52 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Revised Gro...
AI summary The text presents data on gross peak demand savings and discusses the Appliance Retirement program, including the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program and the HomeWarming Program, as part of a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.241 0.119 0.000 0.001 0.001 Appliance Retirement 56 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Evalua...
AI summary This section presents data on the total net peak demand savings at the generator level and continues the evaluation of net energy and peak demand savings by appliance type, including Refrigerators, Freezers, and Dehumidifiers, under the HomeWarming Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
.071 1.100 1.100 1.100 - Total Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.043 0.030 0.443 Appliance Retirement 57 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Repor...
AI summary This section presents a comparison of tracked and evaluated savings from the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It highlights energy and peak demand savings, along with the Net to Gross Ratio (NTGR) for different appliance types.
M Evaluation Report Table 44: List of Rebates by Product Products Spring Rebate Fall Rebate ENERGY STAR certified LED A-type Lamps (1-2 packs/packs of 3 or more) $2/$5 $2/$5 ENERGY STAR certified LED Non-A-type Lamps (1-2 packs/packs of 3...
AI summary The document presents a table listing various energy-efficient products along with their corresponding rebate amounts for the Spring and Fall periods. The table includes items such as LED lamps, fixtures, thermostats, and appliances, with varying rebate amounts depending on the product and quantity purchased.
R certified Dehumidifiers N/A $30 ENERGY STAR certified Bathroom Fans (without a light) N/A $15 In an effort to manage sales and avoid excessively low prices as a result of rebates, ENS implemented a price floor on eligible products in 201...
AI summary In 2017, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) implemented a price floor for eligible products to manage rebate sales and prevent excessively low prices. The Instant Savings program was promoted through various media and events, aiming for 20.0 GWh in electricity savings and 3.3 MW in peak demand savings.
Implemented offerings when needed. 2016 Instant-R2. Closely monitor the evolution of the refrigerator and clothes washer markets. Implemented Recommendation 2016 Instant-R1 involves monitoring various key market indicators that include pro...
AI summary The document discusses the implementation of recommendations related to monitoring market indicators and assessing the impact of new energy efficiency regulations on appliance sales. ENS requested evaluations and data submissions from retailers to analyze the effectiveness of energy efficiency programs and the influence of the 2017 Canadian regulation.
aseline energy consumption and thus, the unitary savings value of appliances sold through Instant Savings. The results of this analysis are presented in the Impact Evaluation section further below. 34 Natural Resources Canada, Notice – Pub...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses participation in the Instant Savings program, noting that 710,540 eligible products were sold, with LED lamps making up the majority. The report attributes the high LED lamp sales in 2016 to unusually low promotional prices, which ENS addressed by setting floor prices to prevent similar situations in the future.
ignificant. This situation is not expected to occur again because ENS has established floor prices for all Instant Savings products and no product can be sold at a price below the value of the rebate. Instant Savings achieved 22.343 GWh in...
AI summary The Instant Savings program saw a 28% decrease in energy savings in 2017 compared to 2016, attributed to ENS's new price floor policy. However, sales of LED fixtures increased by 23%, and other rebated products saw an average 10% increase in sales.
tailers at least 90 days before the campaigns. The 90-day period meets ENS’s need to assess results from previous campaigns prior to confirming product and rebate amounts for the next campaign period. With the exception of one retailer, sa...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the satisfaction levels of retailers with ENS's marketing and advertising activities, noting high satisfaction except for one retailer. It also highlights the need for ENS to provide sufficient time for retailers to advertise rebated products. The report mentions the Instant Savings program and the selection of products and rebate amounts in the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Selection of Products and Rebate Amounts Retailers are generally satisfied with the selection of products included in Instant Savings, with an average satisfaction rating of 8.3 on a 10-poi...
AI summary Retailers have mixed opinions on the selection of products and rebate amounts in the Instant Savings program. While some are satisfied, others suggest removing low-selling items and expanding categories. There is also concern about rebate amounts and pricing structures.
7.6 8 6.3 8 Timeliness providing program component 8.2 9 7.4 8 5.3 8 information Instant Savings 68 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Influence of Instant Savings Retailers were...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of the Instant Savings program on retailers' stocking of ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps. Retailers reported varied impacts, with some indicating significant influence and others noting minimal or no influence, particularly due to a minimum retail price affecting inventory decisions.
d an influence rating of 10, two retailers provided an 8 while another a 7. One retailer gave a rating of 4 and the other three retailers rated the influence of Instant Savings as a 0 on a 0-10 scale. In terms of influencing knowledge of E...
AI summary The document discusses the influence of the Instant Savings program on retailer knowledge and consumer awareness of ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps. Retailers rated the program's impact on knowledge and consumer behavior, with mixed opinions on the effectiveness of the program in promoting technology understanding versus rebate incentives.
Table 47: Influence of Instant Savings Influence Factors Mean Quantity of ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps stocked in store (n=8) 7.1 Staff knowledge of ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps and technology (n=8) 6.1 Consumer knowledge of ENERGY S...
AI summary Retailers identified cost and lack of understanding of energy savings as barriers to purchasing energy-efficient products like ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps. Five retailers cited cost as the main barrier, while three believed insufficient knowledge is now the key barrier to LED adoption.
h as ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps. Five retailers identified cost as the main barrier, while three retailers believe that insufficient knowledge now trumps price as the key barrier to LED adoption. Retailers offered few specific recomme...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to LED adoption, with cost and knowledge identified as key issues. Retailers suggest removing price floors, increasing public awareness, and expanding rebated products to encourage participation in the Instant Savings program. A survey of 100 LED purchasers found that 90% had already installed LEDs, and awareness of ENS and Instant Savings remained high.
r in ten respondents were aware of other energy-efficient products rebated by ENS (40%), with heat pumps mentioned most often (48%), followed by programmable thermostats (44%) and refrigerators (24%). Over nine in ten (94%) respondents kne...
AI summary The 2017 Instant Savings impact evaluation assesses the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings from the program. Respondents were largely aware of rebates, with heat pumps, programmable thermostats, and LED lamps being prominent. In-store promotions and store personnel played a significant role in informing customers about rebates.
n (early replacement) or do they replace burned out lamps (replace on burn-out)? › When participants replace lamps that are still in a working condition, what types of lamps are replaced? These two questions are essential to establishing t...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of determining the baseline for LED lamp replacement in the context of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program. It highlights the need to understand whether lamps are replaced due to burn-out or as part of early replacement programs and the types of lamps being replaced, as this affects the evaluation of program effectiveness.
Number of Number of Percentage of Respondents Lamps Lamps Do you plan on installing these LED bulbs…37 To replace bulbs once they burn out? 33 161 30% To replace bulbs that are still working? 55 374 70% For respondents who are replacing wo...
AI summary The survey found that 70% of LED lamps purchased replaced working lamps, leading to the definition of an Early Replacement Baseline. The baseline wattage was calculated based on the proportion of each lamp type being replaced and the average wattage of LED lamps converted to equivalent CFL, halogen, and incandescent wattages.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The equivalent halogen, incandescent and CFL wattage values were obtained by researching the recommended equivalencies for the 10 most popular products for each categories of LED lamps. As...
AI summary The report discusses the methodology used to calculate wattage equivalencies for LED lamps replacing various types of lamps, including halogen, incandescent, and CFLs. It outlines assumptions made based on product categories and market data, such as the assumption that LED lamps primarily replace A-type lamps and that non-A-type lamps are unlikely to reach the end of their useful life.
ations. For each of these models, the wattage of the minimal efficiency lamp was defined, which in turn allowed for the calculation of the weighted average equivalent wattage for each lamp category. Instant Savings 74 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of equivalent minimal efficiency lamp wattages for LED lamps based on federal regulations and the weighted average of the 10 most popular LED models. It also outlines the replace on burn-out baseline for different LED lamp types and provides displaced wattage values for each category.
Wattages Proportion Baseline LED Lamp Displaced Wattage (W) Wattage (W) Wattage (W) LED A-type Lamps Early Replacement Scenario 70% 28.7 9.8 18.9 Replace On Burn-out Scenario 30% 44.1 9.8 34.3 Total LED A-type Lamps 100% 33.3 9.8 23.5 LED...
AI summary The text presents a table comparing the displaced wattage of different LED lamp types under various replacement scenarios. It highlights the energy savings from replacing traditional lamps with LED alternatives, including A-type, R, BR, and decorative lamps, as well as other non-A-type lamps.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Hours of Operation The Residential Lighting Evaluation Protocol of the Uniform Methods Project39 recommends that each jurisdiction conduct a metering study to determine their specific hours...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the determination of hours of operation for LED lamps through metering studies and the use of in-service rates for upstream programs like Instant Savings. The report references the Uniform Methods Project (UMP) and the NERHOU study for establishing appropriate values.
Protocol, February 2014, pp. 6-20. 40 National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 4.1.2. In-service Rates. http://ump.pnnl.gov/showthread.php/4839-4.12-In-Service- Rate (Last accessed February 16, 2014). Instant Savings 77 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for various lighting products under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program. It outlines the displaced wattage, estimated hours of operation, and the general lighting equation used to determine savings for LED lamps and recessed downlight fixtures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Hours of Operation Similar to LED lamps, the Evaluator concluded that the hours of operation value of LED lamps from the 2014 NERHOU Study (2.9 h/day) is still valid for LED recessed downli...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the evaluation of LED fixtures, including the hours of operation and unitary savings values. It revises unitary savings values based on displaced wattage and uses data from the NERHOU study for hours of operation.
ue of 2.9 based on the NERHOU study.42 Revised Savings The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings value associated with ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures without a motion sensor. Displaced Wattage The Evaluator selected the 10 most popula...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of unitary savings associated with ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures and the calculation of displaced wattage based on light output equivalency to incandescent lamps. The Evaluator used data from retailers and manufacturers, along with energy efficiency regulations, to determine these values.
descent Lamp Wattage43 Old Incandescent Lamps (W) ENERGY STAR Certified Lamp Light Output (Lumens) 40 450 60 800 75 1,100 100 1,600 150 2,600 This analysis indicates that for replaced lamps the average wattage value is 21.4 W and the avera...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings calculations for ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures, comparing old and new wattage values and calculating unitary savings based on displaced wattage and hours of use. The analysis includes both fixtures with and without motion sensors, referencing data from 2016 and the Ontario Power Authority's 2011 guidelines.
A) 2011 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions.44 Revised Savings The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings value associated with ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures equipped with a motion sensor. 43 ENERGY STAR, Learn About Brightness, htt...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures with motion sensors sold through the Instant Savings program, finding that they replace halogen lamps with significant wattage reduction. The displaced wattage was calculated as 143.8 W, and the operating hours were estimated based on previous data.
e 1, 2017. Therefore, the Evaluator used two revised unitary savings values for efficient refrigerators; one was applied to appliances sold before June 1, 2017, and the other to those sold thereafter. The Evaluator reviewed the average con...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed refrigerator energy consumption data before and after June 1, 2017, to determine unitary savings values for efficient refrigerators under the Instant Savings program. Two revised unitary savings values were used: 100 kWh/year before June 1, 2017, and 49 kWh/year thereafter, based on average consumption data from the 10 most popular models.
ber 1, 2016). 48 ENERGY STAR, ENERGY STAR Certified Residential Refrigerators, https://www.energystar.gov/productfinder/product/certified-residential-refrigerators/. (Last accessed January 8, 2018). Instant Savings 82 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The document discusses the revised unitary savings value for efficient refrigerators under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program, showing a reduction in annual savings from 100 to 49 after June 2017.
04 kWh respectively, while the consumption of efficient clothes washers was set at 370 kWh for both scenarios, which led to unitary savings values of 171 and 135 kWh/year respectively. Revised Savings The Evaluator used the same general me...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the revised savings calculations for efficient clothes washers under the Instant Savings program, using the Integrated Modified Energy Factor (IMEF) as a measure of energy efficiency. The report concludes that the efficiency improvements between 2017 and 2018 were not significant enough to warrant different unitary savings values for the period before and after the new regulation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The 10 most popular models sold through Instant Savings were identified based on the data in the tracking sheet. These models constitute 88 percent of all 2017 Instant Savings clothes washe...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia identifies the 10 most popular clothes washer models sold through the Instant Savings program, which accounted for 88% of sales. The report calculates annual energy consumption for both efficient and standard models using IMEF values and load assumptions, resulting in 443 kWh for efficient models and 658 kWh for standard models.
2018, as aforementioned.51 Using the IMEF value of 55.1, the number of loads per year of 290 and the capacity of 125 L, the annual consumption for standard clothes washers was established at 658 kWh. The same algorithm used in previous yea...
AI summary The document calculates the annual electricity consumption for standard clothes washers using an IMEF value of 55.1, number of loads per year (290), and capacity (125 L), resulting in 658 kWh. It also describes the breakdown of energy consumption for both standard and efficient clothes washers during the washing process.
Ratings directory. This same percentage was applied to efficient clothes washers. Where an internal heater was present, it was assumed that 100 percent of the water heating savings were to be claimed. For clothes washers using a domestic h...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to calculate water heating savings for efficient clothes washers, considering the proportion of electrical DHW tanks in Nova Scotia. Discrepancies in data from Natural Resource Canada and EPI participants led to an update in the values used, affecting energy consumption and savings calculations.
able 57 present the calculations of the total electricity consumption for both standard and efficient clothes washers. Table 56: Electricity Consumption for Standard Clothes Washers Energy Consumption Energy Electricity Adjustment Adjusted...
AI summary Tables 56 and 57 compare the electricity consumption of standard and efficient clothes washers, showing that efficient models consume significantly less energy. The average electricity consumption for standard washers is 577 kWh, while for efficient ones it is 389 kWh, resulting in unitary savings of 188 kWh.
d at 577 kWh for a standard clothes washer and 389 kWh for an efficient clothes washer. As a result, the unitary savings were established at 188 kWh. ENERGY STAR Certified Room Air Purifiers This measure consists of the purchase and instal...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency measures, specifically the installation of ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers and efficient clothes washers. It outlines minimum performance requirements for air purifiers and provides unitary savings estimates based on evaluations.
ode Island56 and Maine57) use the following algorithm to calculate the unitary savings of room air purifiers.58 This algorithm is based on the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances. 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 [ ] 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 1 1 𝑊 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟...
AI summary The text describes an algorithm used by jurisdictions like Rhode Island and Maine to calculate the unitary savings of room air purifiers, based on the ENERGY STAR Savings Calculator. The formula involves variables such as Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR), efficiency, standby power, and annual operating hours.
57 Efficiency Maine, Retail/Residential Technical Reference Manual Version 2018.1, July 2017, p.41. 58 Environmental Protection Agency. Savings Calculator for Energy Star Qualified Appliances (2014), http://www.energystar.gov/sites/default...
AI summary The document references the use of the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances to estimate annual operating hours for room air purifiers at 5,840 hours per year, assuming continuous use of 16 hours daily. This is part of an evaluation of residential efficient product rebate programs in Nova Scotia.
was available on the subject, the Evaluator used the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances value of 5,840 hours per year (16 hours per day all year long) for annual operating hours. Currently, the Canadian government has...
AI summary The Evaluator used the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances to estimate annual operating hours and energy consumption for air purifiers. Due to the lack of efficiency data for room air purifiers, baseline values were assumed. ENERGY STAR certified models had lower annual consumption compared to standard models, resulting in estimated unitary savings of 480 kWh per year.
of a standard air purifier was established at 733 kWh. The Evaluator therefore used unitary savings of 480 kWh per year for the room air purifiers sold. ENERGY STAR Certified Dehumidifiers This measure consists of the purchase and installa...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures, including air purifiers and dehumidifiers, and their energy savings. It outlines the use of unitary savings estimates for these products and references ENERGY STAR specifications for dehumidifiers.
ty Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions report.62 These parameters are considered more accurate than parameters based on theoretical studies since they are based on field activities such as metering. Using the tracking sheet and the list...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of dehumidifier efficiency using real-world data, including the use of ENERGY STAR certified products and established energy factors. It highlights the energy factor requirements set by Canadian regulations and the weighted average water removal capacity used in the Instant Savings program.
ov/productfinder/product/certified-dehumidifiers/ (Last accessed August 11, 2017). 64 The average water removal capacity refers to the amount of water the can be removed from the air during a day if a dehumidifier worked at full capacity w...
AI summary The document discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the installation of ENERGY STAR certified bathroom fans without lights as a new measure in the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. A unitary savings of 13 kWh per year is estimated based on early evaluations.
a light instead of a new standard efficiency fan. It is a new measure this year and is part of the pilot. ENS tracked a unitary savings of 13 kWh per year based on an early estimate by the Evaluator. The ENERGY STAR specifications require...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from replacing bathroom fans with more efficient models, using the ENERGY STAR specifications and an algorithm based on the ENERGY STAR Simple Savings Calculator. ENS tracked a unitary savings of 13 kWh per year for this new measure.
rating hours of 360 hours per year based on the Electric Usage Chart Tool of Efficiency Vermont.71 These operating hours represent one hour of daily usage, which the Evaluator considered realistic. 67 Natural Resources Canada, CANADA’S ENE...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of weighted average efficiency levels and nominal exhaust fan capacities based on ENERGY STAR compliant models sold through the Instant Savings program, using data from Efficiency Vermont and other technical references.
alculated a weighted average efficiency level and a nominal exhaust fan capacity based on all efficient fan models sold through Instant Savings, which resulted in 4.66 CFM/W and 99.1 CFM respectively. To determine the average standard fan...
AI summary The text calculates the efficiency levels and annual energy consumption of standard and efficient bathroom fans based on data from ENERGY STAR. A 50% reduction factor was applied to determine standard fan efficiency, leading to unitary savings of 7.85 kWh per year for efficient fans.
Product Tracked Savings Revised Savings (kWh/yr) (kWh/yr) LED A-type Lamps 26.4 24.9 LED Non A-type Lamps (R, BR and Decorative) 46.7 41.3 LED Non A-type Lamps (excluding R, BR and Decorative) 46.7 48.0 LED Recessed Downlight Fixtures 54.8...
AI summary The document presents a table comparing tracked and revised energy savings (in kWh/yr) for various energy-efficient products, including LED lamps, motion sensors, thermostats, and refrigerators. The data highlights the energy savings associated with different types of products and their revisions.
Efficient Refrigerators (before June) 104 100 Efficient Refrigerators (after June) 44.0 49.0 Efficient Clothes Washers (before June) 171 188.0 Efficient Clothes Washers (after June) 135 188.0 ENERGY STAR Certified Room Air Purifiers 372 48...
AI summary The document presents data on efficient appliances and their impact on peak demand savings in Nova Scotia, with a focus on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It highlights the timing of peak demand savings during winter evenings.
peak demand savings during this period are minimal because the lights are turned on most of the time with or without the motion sensor. Consequently, the on-peak demand-to-energy ratio is set at zero. The Evaluator also calculated the on-p...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of on-peak demand-to-energy ratios for various products, including room air purifiers and bathroom fans, based on their operating hours and peak usage patterns. These ratios are used to evaluate the efficiency of products under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program.
Peak Demand- Peak Demand-to-energy Ratio Type of Product to-energy Ratio Category Lighting Products (LED Lamps, LED Recessed Northeast Residential Lighting Downlight Fixtures, ENERGY STAR Certified LED Hours-of-Use Study 0.162 Fixtures Wit...
AI summary The text presents a table analyzing the peak demand-to-energy ratio for various lighting and energy-efficient products, categorizing them under different residential energy use categories. It includes metrics such as CADR, EFBASE, EFEFF, SBPBASE, and SBPEFF, and references Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and Demand Side Management (DSM).
e-Dehumidifier ENERGY STAR Certified Bathroom Fans 0.278 Calculated by the Evaluator (without a light) Interactive Effects In a home, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the ener...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically focusing on how replacing incandescent lighting with LED lamps affects heating and cooling loads. It also outlines ENS's approach to calculating these effects, including the use of different factors for energy savings and peak demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The interactive effects factors used by ENS for energy savings are based on a methodology developed by the Evaluator in 2015 and are still valid for 2017. As for peak demand savings, the Ev...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) uses interactive effects factors for energy savings calculations, based on a 2015 methodology. For peak demand savings, ENS updated its approach to avoid double-counting interactive effects for products with peak demand-to-energy ratios derived from whole-building energy modelling. Adjustments were made for products like LED lamps and dimmer switches.
as, 2015, CANSIM, November 13, 2017. 77 ADS ASSOCIÉS, Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale, Report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. Instant Savings 95 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of energy-efficient products, such as LED lamps and motion sensors, on energy and peak demand savings. Adjustments were made to account for indoor and outdoor installations, using data from the 2016 Socket Study and tracking sheets.
100% 0% -18.0% -29.7% Indoor Motion Sensors with Dimmers 100% 0% -18.0% -29.7% The interactive effects factors were then integrated to the peak demand-to-energy ratios for lighting products as shown in Table 62 below.79 78 Corporate Resear...
AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of peak demand-to-energy ratios for lighting products based on interactive effects factors, as part of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
eak Demand energy Ratio Savings Savings LED Lamps 0.162 -16.6% -27.3% 0.141 LED Recessed Downlight Fixtures 0.162 -18.0% -29.7% 0.139 ENERGY STAR Certified LED 0.162 -15.5% -25.5% 0.143 Fixtures Without Motion Sensors ENERGY STAR Certified...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from various lighting and appliance upgrades, including LED lamps, fixtures, and dimmer switches, along with considerations for interactive effects in refrigerator replacements. It highlights the impact of efficiency improvements and the exclusion of certain interactive effects due to factors like home heating methods.
f homes in Nova Scotia are electrically heated, the interactive effects associated with the purchase of efficient refrigerators were not integrated into the program component net savings calculations. For all other products, interactive ef...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program reviewed the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values used by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) for calculating energy savings. The EUL values were adjusted based on literature reviews and technical references to account for increased baselines over time, ensuring accurate lifetime energy savings estimates.
Table 63: Summary of Effective Useful Life Values by Measure Category ENS Revised Measure Tracked Equivalent Reference EUL EUL LED Lamps A-Type 16.7 9 Analysis of EE regulations (see the explanation below) LED Lamps Non-A-Type 16.7 8 Analy...
AI summary Table 63 outlines effective useful life values for various energy efficiency measures, including LED lamps, fixtures, motion sensors, and timers, with references to analyses and reports such as the IESO PMA List and GDS Measure Life Report.
ESO PMA List Clotheslines and Outdoor Drying 10 10 IESO PMA List Racks 10 10 GDS Measure Life Report, Table 1; value for Programmable Thermostats residential programmable thermostats 12 12 ENERGY STAR Calculator, EPA Research, value for Ef...
AI summary The text lists energy efficiency measures and their associated values, including clotheslines, programmable thermostats, efficient refrigerators, and clothes washers. It references various tools and reports used to calculate energy savings, such as the ENERGY STAR Calculator and the DOE Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period tool. The document is part of a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report ENS Revised Measure Tracked Equivalent Reference EUL EUL Efficient Room Air Purifiers 9 9 ENERGY STAR Calculator, EPA Research, value for Air Purifier Efficient Dehumidifiers 12 12 ENERGY S...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia reviews the accuracy of EUL values for various energy efficiency measures. It confirms that several measures, including efficient room air purifiers and dehumidifiers, have accurate EUL values based on reliable sources. The report also discusses the calculation of equipment life for LED lamps.
as the ratio between the manufacturers’ rated lifetime hours for the most popular models of lamps installed under Instant Savings and the annual HOU value used to calculate unitary savings values. Instant Savings 99 Residential Efficient P...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of equipment life value for various LED lighting products under the Instant Savings and Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program. It provides the average rated lifetime hours, annual hours of use, and equipment life in years for different types of LED lamps and fixtures.
35,010 1,059 33 LED Fixtures With Motion Sensors 43,555 1,077 40 The LED lamps market is evolving rapidly and driven by government regulations. LED lamps installed today are likely to become the baseline before the end of their rated life,...
AI summary The LED lamps market is evolving rapidly due to government regulations and technological advancements, leading to changes in baseline efficiency standards over the product's lifetime. Jurisdictions like Illinois and Massachusetts adjust baselines to reflect new regulations, such as the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2020, which impacts how energy savings are calculated for LED lamps.
nce Manual for Energy Efficiency Version 6.0, Volume 3, February 2017, p. 258. 88 Massachusetts Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Administrators, Massachusetts Technical Reference Manual for Estimating Savings from Energy Efficien...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It addresses the determination of equipment life for LED A-type lamps and the use of a triple baseline approach over an 18-year EUL to account for various factors.
› The replaced incandescent light lamps have an estimated remaining useful life of one year. Incandescent light lamps have a typical rated life expectancy of 1,000 to 2,000 hours.89 The remaining useful life of replaced functional incandes...
AI summary The text discusses the replacement of incandescent light lamps and their estimated useful life, as well as Canadian and U.S. regulations on light lamp efficiency, including the impact of the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 and anticipated future regulations.
be applied within a few years after 2019). The intent is to align the Canadian regulations with the requirements in force or soon to be in force in the United States, EISA 2020 in the case of general service lighting. Since this regulation...
AI summary The text discusses the alignment of Canadian lighting regulations with U.S. standards, specifically the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA 2020), which would ban the import and fabrication of efficient incandescent light lamps. It also references several sources, including the Lighting Research Center and Natural Resources Canada, and mentions the Instant Savings and Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report It should be noted that using the minimum efficiency levels of EISA 2020 starting in 2024 might be optimistic. Since LED lamps are rapidly gaining popularity while CFL market share is decli...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the potential impact of using minimum efficiency levels from EISA 2020, noting that LED lamps may dominate the market by 2024, which could affect savings calculations. The Evaluator used proposed American legislation efficiency levels until the end of the EUL of A-type lamps and established lifetime energy savings values for different lamp replacement scenarios.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 65: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED A-Type Lamps Replaced Early Halogen Incandescent Baseline CFL Equivalent Baseline – Incandescent Baseline – Canadian L...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report provides a summary of equivalent effective useful life calculations for LED A-Type lamps replaced early, comparing energy savings across different lamp types and legislation. The report notes that replaced CFLs and LEDs are not affected by energy efficiency regulations on the baseline.
14% For replaced lamps that are already CFLs of LED lamps, the changing energy efficiency regulation has no impact on the baseline which remains the same throughout the entire EUL of the measure. 94 Natural Resources Canada. “Energy Effici...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of energy efficiency regulations on the baseline energy usage of replaced lamps, noting that the baseline remains unchanged throughout the entire EUL (Equivalent Unit Load) of the measure. It references regulations from Natural Resources Canada and the EISA (Energy Independence and Security Act) legislation.
Lifetime Energy 7 years (2017-2023) 11 years (2024-2034) Savings (kWh) Baseline Wattage Displaced Wattage Baseline Wattage Displaced Wattage 44.1 W 34.3 W 18.4 W 8.6 W 354 The lifetime energy savings values in Table 65 and Table 66 were we...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings calculations for LED A-type and non-A-type lamps over different lifetimes. It calculates equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for LED lamps based on energy savings and regulatory changes, particularly the impact of EISA 2020 on baseline wattage requirements for reflector and decorative lamps.
was established for the other LED non-A-types. Table 67: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Non-A-Types (R, BR and Decorative Lamps) Halogen Incandescent CFL Equivalent Average Baseline – Baseline – American Canad...
AI summary The text discusses the Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) calculation for LED non-A-type lamps, comparing them to halogen incandescent and CFL equivalents, and references regulations from the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA). It also mentions the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Wattage Wattage Wattage101 Wattage 51.9 6.6 51.9 45.3 10.7 4.1 409 9 For LED fixtures, the Evaluator considered that their equivalent EUL can be analyzed the same way as for replaced-on-burn-out lamps since the energy consumption of these...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of LED fixtures' energy efficiency, noting that their equivalent effective useful life (EUL) is capped at 25 years due to early replacement likelihood. The EUL for LED recessed downlight fixtures was set to 8 years, based on a rated life of 38 years for the product category.
motion sensors was thus established at ten years. Table 70: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Fixtures Without Motion Sensors Halogen Incandescent CFL Equivalent Baseline – Baseline – American Average Canadian Le...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) for LED fixtures with and without motion sensors. For LED fixtures without motion sensors, the EUL is calculated based on halogen incandescent and CFL equivalents. For those with motion sensors, the EUL is determined based on reflector lamps, with a calculated EUL of nine years.
ensors at nine years as outlined in Table 71. Table 71: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Fixtures With Motion Sensors Halogen Incandescent CFL Equivalent Baseline – Baseline – American Average Canadian Legislati...
AI summary The text discusses the Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) calculation for LED fixtures with motion sensors, comparing them to halogen incandescent and CFL equivalents. It references U.S. federal legislation and efficiency standards set by the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA).
posed by U.S. federal legislation. Incandescent Equivalent 2nd Tier EISA 2007. 107 Baseline wattage values were established based on the minimum efficiency level of 45 lumen/watts dictated by the EISA regulation and on the assumed level of...
AI summary The document discusses the establishment of baseline wattage values based on EISA regulations and the updating of EUL values for indoor motion sensors and power bars, referencing various reports and standards to ensure accuracy in efficiency evaluations.
LED Non A- Motion LED LED Energy LED A- type Lamp LED Indoor Sensor Outdoor Power Energy Star Fixture Dimmer Product Category type Recessed Motion With Motion Bar with R, BR and Others Downlight Star With Motion Switch Lamp Sensor Dimmer S...
AI summary The text presents data on the number of LED lighting units installed across various categories during Spring and Fall periods, along with energy savings values and interactive effects factors. It includes metrics such as unitary savings value (kWh), gross energy savings (GWh), and a line loss factor of 1.100.
can be due to better knowledge and awareness of energy efficient products and changes in retailer offerings. These sales should be attributable to the program component as a form of market effect. Instant Savings 110 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the impact of the Instant Savings program on LED lamp sales outside of the 2017 campaigns. Retailers reported that 16% of LED lamp sales outside the campaigns can be attributed to the program, driven by increased ENERGY STAR certified LED stock and improved knowledge among salespeople and consumers.
and consumers. Overall, LED lamp sales (both A- type and non-A-type) outside the 2017 campaigns that can be attributed to Instant Savings represent 16 percent of LED lamps sales during the campaigns. The 2017 spillover level of 16 percent...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of the Instant Savings program on LED lamp sales, noting a 16% spillover effect in 2017, lower than 47% in 2016. The decrease is attributed to more accurate data collection in 2017, with retailers voluntarily providing sales data. ENS now requires mandatory annual sales data from retailers starting in 2018 for better accuracy.
as made it mandatory for the participating retailers to provide annual sales data as of 2018, the number of LED lamps sold outside the campaigns will be established with more accuracy and reliability. In addition to the reduced percentage...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) for LED lamps and other products, noting that the NTGR for LED lamps is 0.83, while non-LED products have an NTGR of 1.00. The report highlights challenges in assessing free-ridership and spillover levels for non-LED products due to their specialized nature and smaller buyer populations.
rogram component influence on their sales. Moreover, the buyer populations of these products are smaller, which renders it more difficult to reach them using an intercept or general population survey. 7.3 Net Savings Net savings are define...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of net savings for the Instant Savings program in 2017, including energy and peak demand savings, and the associated GHG emissions avoided. It uses the Nova Scotia-specific GHG factor derived from 2016 data from Nova Scotia Power and Emera Inc.
00 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 Net Peak Demand Savings – at 1.525 0.293 0.463 0.085 0.252 0.086 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 the Generator (MW) Instant Savings 113 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM...
AI summary The text presents a table showing net peak demand savings and energy efficiency metrics for various product categories under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It includes data on smart power, heavy-duty thermostats, and other efficiency-related products.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 8 INSTANT SAVINGS MARKET EVOLUTION ENS has been active in the LED lamp market since 2011 through Instant Savings. The 2016 Evaluation found indicators that market barriers for LED lamps, es...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia has been involved in the LED lamp market since 2011 through the Instant Savings program. The 2016 Evaluation found that market barriers for LED lamps had decreased, leading to a recommendation to continue monitoring market indicators to determine when program offerings should be adjusted or removed.
Savings and 2017 results Socket Saturation According to a socket study conducted in Nova Scotia in 2016, 112 the incidence of households with at least one LED lamp was 59 percent in 2016. Table 76 below compares lamp socket saturation resu...
AI summary The document discusses the increase in LED socket saturation in Nova Scotia from 2011 to 2016, with LED lamps rising from 4% to 24% in permanent fixtures and from 3% to 21% in plug-in lamps. Despite this growth, CFLs and incandescents remained the dominant lamp types in 2016. The data also notes a discrepancy between halogen shipment data and socket study results.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: 2012–2015 Evaluation Reports for Instant Savings, 2016–2017 Tracking Sheets for Instant Savings As demonstrated in Table 77 below, the prices of all LED lamp types have decreased since 2016, with BR lamps h...
AI summary The text discusses the decrease in average prices of LED lamps from 2016 to 2017, with BR lamps showing the largest decrease. The data is sourced from evaluation reports and tracking sheets related to the Instant Savings program and the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia.
4.43 R 10.19 5.59 Decorative 7.81 4.12 The incentives provided by Instant Savings in 2017 were up to $5 for A-type LED lamps and up to $7 for non-A type lamps. The average incentive provided for LED A-type lamps in 2017 was $1.32. The ince...
AI summary The Instant Savings program provided incentives for LED lamps in 2017, with average incentives of $1.32 for A-type lamps, reducing their average price to $1.72. Customer intentions to replace lamps with LEDs have increased, with 40% of residents certain to do so in 2016, up from 26% in 2011. Homeowners are more likely than renters to use LED lamps. The section also discusses codes and standards related to energy efficiency.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 8.1.6 Codes and Standards The ultimate indicator of market transformation is the adoption of more stringent codes and standards. Currently, general service lamps113 are required to meet an...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the adoption of more stringent energy efficiency codes and standards for general service lamps, including the impact of Canadian regulations and potential future alignment with U.S. standards. It also examines the free-ridership level in the LED residential market in Nova Scotia.
M. and Hoefgen L, Market Effects and Market Transformation: Their Role in Energy Efficiency Program Design and Evaluation, Prepared for the California Institute of Energy and the Environment, 2009. Instant Savings 121 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The document discusses the market share and recent trends in LED lamp usage and availability in Nova Scotia, highlighting a 21% saturation rate in permanent fixture lamps and a 24% saturation rate in plug-in lamps as of 2016, along with declining prices and increasing availability through various retailers.
0 Innovators Early Early Late Laggards Adopters Majority Majority Time Instant Savings 123 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 9 OVERALL SAVINGS OF THE RESIDENTIAL EFFICIENT PRODU...
AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, with gross and net savings reported across various program components. The report highlights participation levels and savings metrics, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings.
Lifetime Energy Savings 244.280 GWh 202.166 GWh Peak Demand Savings 3.733 MW 3.001 MW Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program 124 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report CONCLUS...
AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program achieved its energy savings target in 2017 but fell short of peak demand savings goals. The main reason was the lower peak demand-to-energy ratios used for lighting products in the Instant Savings component, which had a significant impact on overall performance. The program resulted in 202.166 GWh in total net lifetime energy savings and 14,785 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually.
t Rebates program. Appliance Retirement A total of 6,138 appliances were retired or replaced through ARet in 2017, generating 3.094 GWh in net energy savings and 0.443 MW in net peak demand savings. The number of appliances retired through...
AI summary In 2017, the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program retired 6,138 appliances, achieving energy and peak demand savings. The HRSB pilot was launched, and metering activities were conducted to improve data accuracy. The Instant Savings program also achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, though slightly below its targets.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Instant Savings therefore missed planned energy savings, which is mainly explained by the lower spillover level established for 2017. Indeed, the retailer interviews revealed a spillover le...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that Instant Savings missed planned energy savings due to a lower spillover level in 2017 (16%) compared to 2016 (47%). Product sales decreased by 30% due to a price floor introduced in 2017, though LED lamps still dominated sales. Retailers expressed overall satisfaction with the program despite some dissatisfaction with the price floor and identified cost and knowledge as barriers to LED adoption.
While most retailers identified cost as the main barrier to LED adoption, some retailers identified insufficient knowledge as the key barrier, which is a first in the history of the program component. As with previous years, the intercept...
AI summary The document highlights that while cost is the main barrier to LED adoption, some retailers note insufficient knowledge as a key barrier. Marketing efforts by ENS, particularly in-store promotions, have been effective in promoting the Instant Savings program. LED lamps are in a growth phase with prices declining, especially for A-type lamps.
stionnaire Appendix VI - IS: Participant Survey Results Appendix VII - IS: Unitary Savings Calculations for Measures not Updated in 2017 Appendix VIII - IS: Algorithm for Free-ridership Calculation Appendix IX - IS: Internal Spillover Meth...
AI summary The document provides appendices related to the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It includes participant survey results, unitary savings calculations, free-ridership calculation algorithms, and internal spillover methodology.
mmends improving the tracking process by clearly identifying the appliances retired through the pilot. 3 The Evaluator recommends that old appliances be plugged in on the evening before the pick-up to ensure that a reasonable temperature i...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the tracking process of retired appliances in the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program, including ensuring old appliances are plugged in before pick-up and annual recalibration of HOBO® data loggers. It also mentions an interview guide with a representative of the Halifax Regional School Board as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report ARET: INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HALIFAX REGIONAL SCHOOL BOARD Introduction I1. The Halifax Regional School Board (HRSB) has participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance Retiremen...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide used by the Assessment and Review Team (ARET) with a representative of the Halifax Regional School Board (HRSB) regarding their participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance Retirement Pilot. The guide explores the HRSB’s involvement, the role of school principals, and the impact of the program on appliance retirement decisions.
liance Retirement Pilot. I will read you a few options. For each one, please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” FR1. Without the support of Efficiency...
AI summary The text presents a survey with questions regarding the likelihood of schools conducting appliance audits and retiring appliances without the support of Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report related to the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program.
Sections Recommendations 1 Continue providing program component support to expand the share of LED bulbs in the Nova Scotia residential lighting market while beginning to plan an exit strategy for A-type bulbs. Given the high participation...
AI summary The document recommends continuing support for expanding LED bulb adoption in Nova Scotia while planning an exit strategy for A-type bulbs. It also suggests monitoring market indicators and collecting data on LED and halogen bulb types and customer knowledge to better understand the lighting market.
uestions included in a periodic Omnibus survey. An Omnibus survey is a cost-effective method where data on a wide variety of subjects is collected during the same interview. Peak Demand 3 The Evaluator compared these results with those fro...
AI summary The text discusses the use of an Omnibus survey to collect data on peak demand and energy savings, comparing results from the NERHOU study with the Residential Lighting Metering Study. It also references the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program and an interview guide used for the Instant Savings Program.
troduction Hello, my name is _, from Corporate Research Associates. I am calling on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia for the Instant Savings Program. Identification and Screening of Respondent The records we received from Efficiency Nova S...
AI summary The text outlines a call from Corporate Research Associates on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia to interview a person responsible for stocking and supplying LED light bulbs under the Instant Savings Program. The call includes confidentiality and recording consent, and provides context about the program's promotional campaigns.
September 29 to October 29 2017? L2. Would sales of ENERGY STAR A-type LED bulbs during the spring and fall campaigns have been the same, lower or higher without the Instant Savings program? Same [SKIP TO NEXT SECTION] Lower [SKIP TO L2b]...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions from a regulatory proceeding related to the sales of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs, specifically A-type and non-A-type bulbs, during the spring and fall campaigns of 2017. It explores the impact of the Instant Savings program on bulb sales and asks for estimates of sales changes without the rebate program.
Higher [SKIP TO N2a] Don’t know [SKIP TO NEXT SECTION] Refused [SKIP TO NEXT SECTION] N2a. [IF HIGHER] Why do you think your sales would have been higher without the rebate program? N2b. [IF LOWER] By what percentage do you estimate the nu...
AI summary The text includes survey questions assessing the impact of the Instant Savings program on sales, staff and consumer knowledge, and product availability of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs. The questions aim to evaluate the program's effectiveness in increasing sales and awareness.
ocked in your stores Scale: Please explain your response: d. The quantity of ENERGY STAR LED bulbs stocked in your stores Scale: Please explain your response: I2. While the Instant Savings rebates are only offered during the spring and fal...
AI summary The document discusses Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotion of energy-efficient products, such as LED bulbs, throughout the year, highlighting the impact of Instant Savings rebates and other programs on LED sales. It notes that while rebates are limited to seasonal campaigns, ongoing promotion may still influence customer behavior and product knowledge.
S0. On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is ‘’not at all satisfied’’ and 10 is ‘’completely satisfied’’, please rate your satisfaction in regard to the following aspects of the Instant Savings program. Score Reason 1 = not at all satisfied Aspec...
AI summary The text presents a survey asking participants to rate their satisfaction with the Instant Savings program and identify barriers to purchasing energy-efficient products. It includes questions on program aspects, rebate processing, and perceived barriers.
Savings program. BR1. In your opinion, what prevents consumers from buying energy-efficient products? What is the single most important barrier? How if at all has that changed in the past year? BR2. And finally, what suggestions do you hav...
AI summary The text discusses a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia to gather insights on consumer behavior regarding the purchase of energy-efficient LED lights. It includes questions about barriers to purchasing energy-efficient products and suggestions for increasing program participation.
ASK I1a] I1a. Would you mind showing me the L-E-Ds you bought today? [CODE ONE ONLY] [CONFIRM VISUALLY THAT THE PRODUCT BOUGHT BY RESPONDENTS IS L-E-Ds. IF NO, THANK AND TERMINATE.] 1. Product is L-E-D [CONTINUE] 2. Other type of bulbs/pro...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for a residential efficient product rebate program, specifically targeting LED bulb purchases. It includes instructions for interviewers on verifying purchases and collecting data on discounts and number of bulbs purchased.
To replace bulbs once they burn out 2. To replace bulbs that are still working 97. (Other [SPECIFY ]) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) P6a. [If P2_LED or P2_LEDconfirm=1] Do you plan on installing this L-E-D bulb in a specific room in partic...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to the installation of LED bulbs, including replacement practices and room-specific installation plans. It is part of a residential energy efficiency program evaluation conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia in 2017.
lled in a…? [READ] NOTE TO INTERVIEWER – ALL CATEGORIES NEED A NUMBER, ADD IN ZEROS FOR ANY THAT WERE NOT SELECTED. SUM OF BULBS CANNOT EXCEED NUMBER FROM P2_LED or P2_LEDconfirm 1. Kitchen 2. Living room 3. Bedroom 4. Bathroom 5. Dining r...
AI summary The document includes instructions for interviewers regarding data collection on the placement of energy-efficient light bulbs and awareness of the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, which offers instant savings for energy-efficient product purchases.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report CS1. How did you find out about this program? [DON’T READ; ALLOW MULTIPLE RESPONSE BUT DO NOT PROBE FOR MULTIPLE] 1. (TV ads) 2. (Print ads) 3. (Radio ads) 4. (In-store promotions) 5. (Store flyer) 6....
AI summary The document is an appendix report from the 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on customer awareness and participation in the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes survey questions about how participants learned about the program and their prior awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia.
ng tables. P1. Are there any L-E-Ds currently installed in your home? LED Lamps Currently Installed 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 255 246 100 Yes 84% 87% 90% No 16% 13% 7% Don’t know - - 3% P2. How many L-E-Ds did you purchase today? Number P...
AI summary The text presents data on the installation and purchase of LED lamps in homes from 2015 to 2017, showing an increasing percentage of households with LEDs installed and varying numbers of LEDs purchased annually.
5.1 6.8 6.2 Don’t know/Refused excluded from Average calculations A number of respondents are missing this question in the Spring data as it was optional P3a/P4. For which of the following reasons did you buy this/these L-E-D bulb(s)? Do y...
AI summary The data shows the reasons respondents purchased LED bulbs between 2015 and 2017, with the majority replacing CFL or halogen bulbs. The sample sizes and percentages are provided for each year, highlighting a shift in replacement preferences over time.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report P5. Concerning the bulbs that you will use to replace existing bulbs: do you plan on installing these L-E-D bulbs mostly… Reason for Purchasing LED Bulbs 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 95 220 91 To replace...
AI summary The text presents survey data on reasons for purchasing LED bulbs for replacement in 2015, 2016, and 2017, with a focus on replacement behavior and room-specific installation plans.
2% Family room 2% Closet or storage 1% Others 3% Base: Respondents who planned on installing bulb(s) in specific rooms Project No. 6138 24 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix...
AI summary The document provides data on awareness of the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, which offers rebates for energy-efficient products. It includes survey results from 2015 to 2017 showing awareness rates and sources of information about the program.
% 3% Don’t know 1% 1% - Multiple responses Base: Respondents who were aware of Instant Savings Project No. 6138 25 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report AW3. Prior to tod...
AI summary The text discusses survey data on awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia and customer knowledge of LED discounts. It shows high awareness levels and highlights customer responses regarding discounts on LED purchases.
on the purchase of L-E-Ds? FR0bb/FR0b. I just want to make sure I understand - You did not know about the discount on specific packages of L-E-Ds before paying at the register? Discount Awareness 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 255 246 100 Yes,...
AI summary The text discusses survey results regarding consumer awareness of discounts on LED lamps. In 2015, 79% of respondents were aware of discounts before purchasing, increasing to 94% in 2017. Additionally, prior to a rebate campaign in 2016, only 16% of respondents were aware of the discounts being offered that fall.
discount offered on the purchase of specific packages of L-E-Ds? Learn of Discount 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 201 221 94 In-store promotions 79% 66% 78% Store personnel 18% 15% 16% Store flyer - 1% 9% Through an ENS representative during a...
AI summary The text outlines various channels through which discounts on LED packages were learned about in 2015, 2016, and 2017, with in-store promotions being the most common method, followed by store personnel and other forms of advertising.
- 1% - Others - - 1% Don’t know - - 2% Base: Respondents who were aware of discount prior to purchase Multiple responses Wording change in 2017 Project No. 6138 27 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 D...
AI summary The text provides survey data on awareness of in-store promotions for LED bulbs under the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program. It shows high awareness of promotional materials in 2015, 2016, and 2017, with slight variations. The data also includes a question about the influence of knowing about the discount on purchasing decisions.
answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that you “Definitely Would Not Have Bought these L-E-Ds” and a 10 indicating that you “Definitely Would Have Bought these L-E-Ds.” 2015 2016 2017 Likelihood of Buying LEDs without Discount...
AI summary The text presents survey data on consumer likelihood of purchasing LEDs with and without discounts, showing an increase in likelihood over the years 2015 to 2017. It asks respondents how long they would have waited to purchase LEDs if the discount had not been offered.
R5. Without the discount, would you have definitely purchased the same number of L-E-Ds, probably purchased the same number, probably purchased fewer or definitely purchased fewer? Number of Bulbs Likely To Purchase 2015 2016 2017 Without...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer behavior regarding LED bulb purchases with and without discounts, and asks respondents if they are aware of other energy efficiency products discounted by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Other Discounted Products 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 73 58 25 Heat Pumps - - 48% Programmable thermostats 33% 41% 44% Refrigerators 26% 19% 24% Power bars or smart strips 19% 22% 16% LED fixtures 12% 3% 12% Windows - - 8% Hot water tank -...
AI summary The table presents data on the adoption rates of various energy-efficient products across different years, highlighting the percentage of participants who have installed specific items such as heat pumps, programmable thermostats, and LED fixtures from 2015 to 2017.
59% 62% 53% Female 41% 38% 47% Refused excluded from calculations Project No. 6138 32 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report IS: UNITARY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS FOR MEASURES...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Appendix Report discusses the use of 2016 unitary savings values for dimmer switches and indoor motion sensors, relying on previous evaluations and assumptions for calculations, as parameters for these measures remained stable.
mer switch savings value of 20 percent of the wattage, which is based on the OPA 2011 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions, and a fixture wattage value equal to two 43 W lamps. Indoor Motion Sensors ENS and the Evaluator used a unitary sa...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for various lighting efficiency measures, including mer switch savings, indoor motion sensors, and indoor motion sensors with dimmer switches, using data from studies and prescriptive measures from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA).
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Outdoor Motion Sensors ENS and the Evaluator used a unitary savings value of 159 kWh per year for outdoor motion sensors, based on last year’s evaluation results. This value is b...
AI summary The document details the methodology used by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) in evaluating energy savings from outdoor motion sensors, power bars with integrated timers, and load sensing power bars. Savings values are based on past evaluations and assumptions from the OPA 2011 report and other technical references.
re the most common product sold through Instant Savings, the unitary savings value is an average calculated based on the unitary savings for five-plug and seven-plug units sold for an unspecified use. Heavy-Duty Outdoor Timers ENS and the...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings values for energy-efficient products, specifically heavy-duty outdoor timers and programmable thermostats, referencing evaluations and reports from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). These values are used for calculating energy savings in the Instant Savings and Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Programmable Thermostats For programmable thermostats, ENS has been using a unitary savings value of 221 kWh per year since the 2011 evaluation. This value is based on the result...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has been using a unitary savings value of 221 kWh per year for programmable thermostats since 2011, based on Hydro-Québec’s 2009 evaluation. A unitary savings value of 150 kWh per year is used for clotheslines and outdoor drying racks, based on the 2011 OPA calculations and NRCan data.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report IS: INTERNAL SPILLOVER METHODOLOGY The retailer interviews were used to estimate the level of spillover by measuring the market effects attributable to the program for LED lamps....
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to estimate internal spillover effects from the Instant Savings program, focusing on LED lamp sales during spring and fall campaigns. Retailers were interviewed to assess program attribution for eligible product sales outside the campaigns, allowing for the estimation of market effects.
%LEDIS the spring and fall campaign periods combined - that is from March 30 to May 14, and from September 29 to October 29 2017? If retailers sales data available: #LEDOut = sales data LED Sales Outside Spring and Fall Campaigns If not av...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's existing residential program in 2017, focusing on the sales of ENERGY STAR LEDs outside of campaign periods and the influence of ENS programs on these sales. It includes formulas for calculating LED sales and final market effects.
ogram Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report MSHP Mini-split heat pump MURB Multi-unit Residential Building NERHOU Northeast Residential Hours of Use (study) NRCan Natural Resources Canada NTGR Net-to-gross ratio OPA Ontario Pow...
AI summary This document is the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the evaluation of existing residential energy efficiency programs. It includes definitions of key terms and acronyms related to energy efficiency and heating technologies.
ion of the Parameters and their Numerical Values - GSHP ........................................ 85 Table 44: Analysis of Electricity Consumption for Participants who Installed GSHPs .......................... 87 Existing Residential Progr...
AI summary The text references the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which analyzes the existing residential program, including the analysis of electricity consumption for participants who installed ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs).
.......................... 53 Figure 15: Contractor Satisfaction with Green Heat by Path ................................................................ 55 Figure 16: Green Heat Influence on Contractors (n=17)................................
AI summary This report evaluates the demand-side management (DSM) results of the 2017 Existing Residential program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), which includes Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation components. Table 1 summarizes participation levels and savings for each component.
Table 1: Overall Participation and Savings for Existing Residential Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings HEA Energy Savings 8.306 GWh 0.76 7.007 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 931 participants 166.116 GWh 0.76 140.139 GWh Peak D...
AI summary The table presents energy savings and participation levels for residential programs in Nova Scotia, including HEA, Green Heat, and EPI. It shows gross and net savings in terms of GWh and MW for energy and peak demand, along with participation numbers and NTGR factors.
9.779 MW 7.183 MW 1 Throughout this report, energy savings always refer to first-year energy savings rather than lifetime energy savings, unless specified otherwise. Existing Residential Program xiii Existing Residential Program Efficiency...
AI summary The 2017 HEA evaluation reviewed the Home Energy Assessment program, which helps homeowners improve energy efficiency. The program shifted focus after provincial funding ceased in 2015, limiting participation to electrically heated homes and expanding eligible measures to include heating and water-heating equipment. The evaluation included program documentation, interviews, surveys, and a literature review on effective useful life.
am documentation review, interviews with the program manager and four EAs, a telephone survey of 70 participants and an effective useful life (EUL) literature review. HEA Key Findings HEA Performance HEA aimed to achieve 5.4 GWh in net ene...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program achieved higher energy and peak demand savings in 2017 than its target, despite a decrease in participation due to the discontinuation of provincial funding. Savings per participant increased due to a shift in participant demographics and higher installation of space-heating appliances.
Participation 7.526 Net Savings 2,500 8.0 7.184 7.007 8.0 7.0 2,000 5.456 5.785 6.0 6.0 4.805 3.906 5.0 2.588 4.723 1,500 4.872 3.216 4.0 4.0 1,000 2.469 2.567 2.370 1.981 3.0 1.543 1.423 1.162 1.378 1.571 2.0 2.0 0.602 500 1,494 1,839 1,6...
AI summary The text presents data on participation numbers, energy savings, and peak demand savings over the years 2011 to 2017. It includes a table showing the number of participants, net energy savings per participant, and peak demand savings. The section is titled 'HEA Market Evaluation Highlights', indicating a focus on the Home Energy Assessment program.
Energy Savings (GWh) Net Energy Savings per Participant (MWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) HEA Market Evaluation Highlights Satisfaction with HEA was high among participants and EAs in 2017. Participants gave an average satisfaction rating of...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights high participant and EA satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, though some issues with rebate amounts and clarity of program requirements were noted. EAs praised the program's environmental benefits and integration of NRCan standards but found rebate calculations challenging. Training on new technologies was identified as a useful future topic.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report HEA Energy Savings The objective of the 2017 HEA impact evaluation was to determine the net energy and peak demand savings. To calculate gross savings, the Evaluator reviewed the contents o...
AI summary The 2017 HEA impact evaluation determined the net energy and peak demand savings by calculating gross savings using HOT2000 simulations and adjusting for free-ridership and internal spillover. A net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) of 0.76 was established based on a 25% free-ridership level and 1% internal spillover.
2017 Free-ridership Level 25% Spillover Level 1% Net-to-gross Ratio 0.76 Another spillover effect associated with unconverted D assessment savings was also considered in the net energy and peak demand savings calculations. This spillover c...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses free-ridership and spillover effects in the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. It calculates net energy and peak demand savings by accounting for unconverted D assessment participants and uses the 2016 evaluation data. Net savings for 2017 were 7.007 GWh in energy and 1.981 MW in peak demand.
Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 3: Comparison of HEA Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Adjusted Gross NTGR Net Savings Savings Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 8.945 GWh 8.298 GWh 0.78...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report compares tracked and evaluated energy and peak demand savings from the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. Evaluated net savings are 2% lower than tracked savings due to a decrease in the NTGR value. HEA received positive feedback and exceeded planned savings, with specific recommendations for improvement provided in the report.
tions specifically made for HEA. The recommendations for improving Green Heat and EPI are presented further below in this executive summary. The following recommendations are also found in Appendix I. 2017 HEA-R1. Review the current incent...
AI summary The document discusses recommendations for improving the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) and Efficient Product Installation (EPI) programs. It highlights the need to simplify the incentive structure and conduct a billing analysis to address overestimation in savings calculations using the HOT2000 tool.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Green Heat Green Heat provides financial incentives to homeowners and encourages them to reduce electricity used for heating by either installing high-efficiency electrical systems or repla...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses changes to the Green Heat program, including a shift from a pre-approval process to a mail-in rebate system, with eligibility divided into old and new paths. The program offers rebates for high-efficiency heating systems and has partnered with Nova Scotia Power for on-bill financing.
easure. Moreover, the removal of the pre-approval process as of August 2017 likely contributed to higher participation. Figure 2: Overview of Green Heat Performance, 2011-2017 Participation Net Savings 6.303 3.992 5.714 5.724 5.304 1,829 5...
AI summary The text discusses the Green Heat program's performance from 2011 to 2017, noting an increase in participation but lower net energy savings in 2017 due to billing analyses affecting MSHPs and ASHPs. Peak demand savings, however, increased in line with participation levels.
ed in 2017. However, peak demand savings increased similarly to participation levels since they were not affected by the billing analysis findings. Green Heat Process and Market Evaluation Highlights Participants were largely satisfied wit...
AI summary The evaluation of the Green Heat program highlights participant satisfaction with most aspects, except rebate amounts. Contractors generally favor the new Green Heat process, though some were unfamiliar with it. The program's equipment quality and eligibility process were well-received, while concerns about equipment reliability and contractor qualifications were noted.
of interviewed contractors were unfamiliar with the new Green Heat path, the remaining contractors who knew about the new path appeared to be more satisfied with the new path compared to the old path. Almost all contractors reported promot...
AI summary Contractors are more satisfied with the new Green Heat path, though many were unfamiliar with it. Marketing efforts have supported promotion, with long-term savings highlighted as effective. Most participants were already aware of MSHPs, but non-MSHP participants face challenges due to lack of rebated equipment lists. Outreach improvements were recommended.
wed the unitary and calculated savings values used for each type of equipment category based on the information in the tracking system, site visit results, literature reviews and two billing analyses. Again this year, a billing analysis wa...
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of energy savings from the installation of Multi-Split Heat Pumps (MSHPs) in residential settings. A billing analysis was conducted with 170 participants, revealing average energy savings values of 0.179 kWh/Btu/h for fully electrically heated households and 0.060 kWh/Btu/h for mainly electrically heated households. The analysis also considered non-electrically heated households using equivalent full-load hours (EFLH) values.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report For the first time, a billing analysis was performed for the 2017 evaluation with participants who had installed an ASHP in previous years. A total of 33 participants were included in the f...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report analyzed energy savings from air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) installed in electrically heated households, finding an average energy savings value of 0.101 kWh/Btu/h. The report also established an EFLH value of 604 hours for non-electrical participants and noted that revised energy savings are lower than previously tracked due to the presence of other heating systems.
Average Free- Net-to-gross Measure Category FR Old Path FR New Path ridership Level Ratio Biomass and Solar Measures 36% - 36% 0.64 Central Heat Pumps 44% - 44% 0.56 MSHPs - Fully electrically heated 35% 51% 42% 0.58 MSHPs - Mainly electri...
AI summary The document presents data on free-ridership levels and net-to-gross ratios for various energy efficiency measures, including biomass, solar, and heat pumps. It also references a 2017 DSM evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, highlighting energy and peak demand savings calculated using the NTGR method.
inly for new path participants with electric heating who installed MSHPs. For those participants, the difference in free-ridership level was 16 percentage points between the old path and the new path. The evaluated net peak demand savings...
AI summary The document discusses free-ridership differences between old and new paths for participants with electric heating who installed MSHPs, noting an 18% higher net peak demand savings evaluation compared to ENS tracking. It also analyzes the growth of the MSHP market in Nova Scotia and notes that while market share increased, the efficiency of MSHP units has not significantly improved since 2015.
efficiency of units incented through Green Heat has increased somewhat over time (from 12.34 to 13.04), there is very little change in the overall efficiency of the incented units over the period. Existing Residential Program xxii Existing...
AI summary The efficiency of incentivized units through Green Heat has slightly increased, but overall efficiency has remained stable. Market trends suggest that new eligibility criteria may shift the MSHP market toward higher efficiency units, though regulatory changes have had limited impact. More data is needed to assess market adoption of MSHPs in Nova Scotia.
unable to provide an indication of MSHP market adoption on the theoretical curve of technology diffusion as further data is required to fully assess the transformation of this market in Nova Scotia.4 Green Heat Recommendations The Evaluato...
AI summary The evaluation of the Green Heat program found that while participation increased, energy savings from MSHP and ASHP installations were lower than expected. Recommendations include re-evaluating ASHP savings calculations with a larger sample size to improve accuracy.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 2017 GH-R2. Conduct a survey with a larger sample of participants who installed MSHPs in non-electrically heated households. As part of the 2017 evaluation, a participant survey was conduct...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report recommends conducting a larger survey in 2018 to better understand the impact of Green Heat on participants who installed MSHPs in non-electrically heated households, as the initial sample size was too small to provide meaningful insights.
-electrically heated households generated lower savings, this feedback could provide more insight on whether the inclusion of this measure in Green Heat should be reconsidered. 2017 GH-R3. Improve the collection of technical information ab...
AI summary The document discusses the need to improve the collection of technical data on ASHPs and gather additional information on the MSHP market in Nova Scotia. It highlights the importance of accurate performance data for peak demand savings calculations and the lack of comprehensive market data for MSHPs.
a result, the Evaluator was unable to formulate a clear conclusion on the current state of the MSHP market in Nova Scotia. Additional data should be collected in 2018, such as: › Market share of efficient MSHPs in Nova Scotia from a broade...
AI summary The Evaluator was unable to determine the current state of the MSHP market in Nova Scotia due to a lack of sufficient data. Recommendations include collecting more data in 2018, such as market share and efficiency levels. Efficiency Nova Scotia is advised to create a list of eligible ASHP equipment to help participants make informed decisions and avoid dissatisfaction.
s eligible for a rebate, ENS should develop a list of eligible equipment, similar to the list established for MSHPs. Contractors could be asked to develop and update this list. Efficient Product Installation In January 2017, the former Ren...
AI summary The EPI program component, formed in 2017 by merging former programs, provides free installation of energy-efficient products to Nova Scotia residents, with a focus on low-income households. In 2017, EPI achieved 17.877 GWh in net energy savings and 2.129 MW in net peak demand savings, though participation and product installations decreased compared to the previous year.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The average number of products per participant has increased overall, partially because of the higher proportion of participants living in single-family homes in 2017, which typically have...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that the average number of products per participant increased, partly due to more single-family home participants. However, A-type lamp replacements decreased significantly, impacting EPI's gross savings. EPI received high participant satisfaction ratings, with positive feedback on installer interactions and overall service quality.
ompleted, the time required to complete the work, the energy-efficient products installed, and the information provided by the installer, also received strong satisfaction ratings. EPI Energy Savings To calculate EPI’s gross energy savings...
AI summary The evaluation of EPI's energy savings found high installation rates across most product categories, except for smart power controllers, which had a low installation rate. Despite efforts to improve this, the rate remained low. Net energy savings were calculated using an NTGR, which varied by participant group.
NTGR Net Savings Savings Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 21.257 GWh 20.460 GWh 0.88 18.082 GWh Evaluation Results 21.308 GWh 19.439 GWh 0.92 17.877 GWh Peak Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 3.487 MW 3.461 MW 0.87 3.0...
AI summary The document compares tracked and evaluated net savings from energy efficiency programs, noting that evaluated net energy savings are slightly lower than tracked savings. The decrease in installation rates, particularly for smart power controllers, and changes in peak demand-to-energy ratios for lighting products are key factors affecting the results.
emand savings. This difference was mainly associated with the lower evaluated peak demand-to-energy ratios used for lighting products based on the findings of the Residential Lighting Metering Study. Existing Residential Program xxviii Exi...
AI summary The EPI program achieved high participation and savings despite competition from earlier programs like RDI and RP&C. Satisfaction remains high, but future challenges include reduced potential for LED lamp installations as incandescent lamps become less common. One key recommendation is provided for improving EPI.
rogram components in the 2017 DSM Programs Evaluation Executive Summary, the Evaluator has one main recommendation on how to improve EPI, which is presented below and can also be found in Appendix XV. 2017 EPI-R1. Document the energy-savin...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Program Evaluation Executive Summary highlights a recommendation to improve the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program by documenting energy-saving potential from halogen incandescents and CFL lamp replacements. It notes a decline in the average number of LED lamps installed per household, suggesting fewer incandescents are present and fewer future replacement opportunities.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report INTRODUCTION Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is a franchise held by EfficiencyOne7 and is responsible for helping Nova Scotians improve the energy efficiency of their homes and workplaces. ENS...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is a franchise held by EfficiencyOne7 and delivers energy efficiency programs funded by Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia. Econoler led the evaluation of ENS's 2017 demand-side management (DSM) program portfolio, collaborating with multiple firms to assess program impact and energy efficiency codes.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement C C R Product Rebates Program Instant Savings C C R R Home Energy Assessment C C C C Existing Residential Green Heat C C C C C Program Efficient Product Installation C C C C New Residential Progra...
AI summary The document outlines various residential and business energy efficiency programs, including appliance rebates, home energy assessments, and custom incentive programs. It highlights initiatives such as the Efficient Product Installation and the Strategic Energy Management program, which are being evaluated for their effectiveness.
tions The process evaluation specifically targets the Retrofit service of the Custom program component. Due to the start date of the latest Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, SEM did not have any participants who achieved savings in...
AI summary The document discusses the 2017 evaluation of the Existing Residential program, which includes the Home Energy Assessment (HEA), Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation (EPI) components. It highlights that a process evaluation was added for Green Heat in 2017 due to program changes and outlines the evaluation methodology and findings.
e Green Heat and EPI program components follow. This section describes the HEA program component, follows up on the 2016 evaluation recommendations and gives an overview of its participation history. 1.1 Description HEA is meant to help ho...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program in Nova Scotia provides education and financial incentives for energy efficiency upgrades, including insulation and heating equipment. After provincial funding ended in 2015, only electrically-heated households became eligible. A new incentive structure introduced in 2015 encourages bundled upgrades with higher incentives for 'Green' and 'Smart' measures.
ing to its level of energy efficiency and the role it plays in a home’s energy usage. Depending on the Green and Smart upgrades combined, a participant can receive a maximum incentive of up to $5,000. HEA uses the EnerGuide home evaluation...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program evaluates homes for energy efficiency and provides incentives based on the level of upgrades. It uses the EnerGuide framework and is administered by delivery agents (DAs) in collaboration with Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). Homeowners initiate the process by contacting a DA to schedule an assessment with an energy advisor (EA).
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The pre-retrofit assessment is carried out to examine the house, complete a blower door test and collect information, such as the levels of insulation (attic, exterior wall, etc.), the numb...
AI summary This report outlines the process of pre-retrofit assessments conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) to evaluate home energy efficiency. It details the use of tools like the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) and the Energy Action Plan (EAP) to inform homeowners about potential upgrades and their benefits. The EnerGuide rating system, updated in 2017 to use gigajoules (GJ), is also discussed.
n (EAP) to help homeowners who may struggle with how to move forward with upgrades. The EAP includes brief information about the energy assessment, as well as the estimated costs, savings and payback. Homeowners then have 12 months to comp...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program provides homeowners with guidance on energy upgrades, including pre- and post-retrofit assessments. The program aimed for 5.4 GWh in net energy savings and 1.3 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017. Follow-up actions from a 2016 evaluation report have been implemented, including assigning staff to answer questions, using unitary savings for DHW measures, and maintaining follow-ups with EAs.
and continue to conduct project reviews to Implemented assess the progression of simulation file quality. Home Energy Assessment 4 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report All three 2016 recommendation...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) implemented all three 2016 recommendations, including assigning personnel to address HEA questions and establishing a shared-folder system for communication. ENS also continued reviewing projects in 2017 to ensure the quality of simulations and proper data collection for home modeling.
has continued reviewing projects in 2017, as per Recommendation 2016 HEA-R3, to ensure the overall quality of the simulations and that all the data needed to model the homes is collected and recorded. 1.3 Participation History A total of 9...
AI summary In 2017, 931 participants took part in the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, with participation levels similar to the previous year but lower than in earlier years due to the discontinuation of provincial funding in 2015. Despite lower participation, average savings per participant increased significantly to 8.922 MWh, partly due to incentives for space-heating equipment and a higher percentage of participants installing such appliances.
n lower electric savings per participant because space-heating is the main source of savings under this program component. Figure 4: Overview of Participation in HEA, 2011-2017 Participation 2,500 10 8.922 2,343 2,000 8 1,839 1,494 1,647 1...
AI summary The text discusses the participation numbers and electric savings per participant in the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program from 2011 to 2017, highlighting that space-heating is the main source of savings under this program component.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Number of Participants Gross Savings per Participant (MWh) Home Energy Assessment 5 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Despite a participation level similar to...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report shows that the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program achieved 8.306 GWh in gross energy savings and 2.348 MW in gross peak demand savings, despite participation levels similar to 2016. The report includes a visual representation of HEA's savings evolution from 2011 to 2017.
0.824 1.216 1.041 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Home Energy Assessment 6 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 2 HEA EVALUATION METHODOLOGY This section prese...
AI summary The 2017 HEA evaluation methodology involved reviewing program documentation, meeting with the program manager, and preparing data collection instruments based on the information obtained.
s-influence from ENS promotion and other program components) › Internal spillover › Barriers to the implementation of recommended upgrades › Recommendations for improvements › Demographics The total number of HEA participants was 931 for t...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program component, including participant perspectives, survey results, and an evaluation of the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values used by ENS. A sample of 70 participants was surveyed to assess satisfaction, barriers, and program influence.
questions designed for impact evaluation purposes, survey participants were asked questions regarding satisfaction, barriers to participation, influence from other ENS activities, and recommendations. Participants cited a number of reasons...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program received high participant satisfaction, with saving energy being the main reason for participation. Participants were particularly satisfied with the customer service and expertise of Energy Advisors (EAs) and the initial energy assessment. Some dissatisfaction was noted due to low rebate amounts and unclear program requirements.
9.3 The initial energy assessment overall (n=70) 9.3 The expertise of the EA (n=70) 9.2 Length of time allowed to complete your upgrades (n=69) 9.1 The Energy Efficiency Evaluation Report you received about home's energy use and recommenda...
AI summary Participants rated various aspects of the energy assessment process, with the Energy Action Plan (EAP) receiving an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. The EAP was found to be useful but had some criticisms regarding the lack of new information and specificity. Participants prioritized reducing energy costs and consumption over other factors like home value or cost.
mely important), reducing energy consumption (9.5) and increasing comfort at home (9.0) were considered more important than increasing the home’s value of (7.5), or using the lowest cost option (6.3). In terms of recommendations to improve...
AI summary Participants emphasized the importance of reducing energy consumption and increasing home comfort over other factors like home value and cost. Some participants requested greater clarity on incentive structures, increased rebates, and more eligible products for rebates.
Perspectives Interviews with four EAs were conducted as part of the HEA evaluation. The following subsections discuss the results of these interviews. 3.2.1 Involvement in and Satisfaction with HEA Satisfaction with HEA overall was high, a...
AI summary Interviews with Energy Advisors (EAs) about the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program showed high satisfaction, with an average rating of 8.3. EAs praised the program's environmental benefits and clear instructions from Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), but raised concerns about limited appeal for non-electrically heated homes and the time required for assessments in larger or older homes.
about the amount of energy savings that HEA can provide, thereby causing some homeowners to implement just some and not all of the upgrades that they could have in houses with high savings potential. EAs’ satisfaction with the eligible mea...
AI summary Energy Advisors (EAs) report high satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, though they note challenges with homeowner understanding of rebate calculations and suggest improvements, such as increasing incentives for deep energy retrofits and PV panels. Marketing efforts by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) are also highly rated.
by ENS (n=4) The eligible measures and equipment (n=4) 9.0 Your relationship with ENS staff (n=3) 8.0 The incentive structure (n=4) 7.8 Communication with ENS staff (including how program component updates and changes are 7.3 communicated)...
AI summary The document discusses feedback from Energy Advisors (EAs) regarding the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. Positive feedback includes the tiered incentive approach and alignment with homeowner expectations, while negative feedback highlights limitations such as the exclusion of non-electrically heated homes and complex rebate calculations.
n the Customer Rebate Guide is a downfall. Indeed, some surveyed participants mentioned the need to clarify the incentive structure and how to reach incentives as a main area for HEA’s improvement. Home Energy Assessment 12 Existing Reside...
AI summary The document discusses feedback on the Customer Rebate Guide and training needs for Energy Advisors (EAs) in the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. Some participants called for clearer incentive structures, while EAs suggested training on technology updates, program guidelines, and Nova Scotia-specific climate challenges.
n Rating Rating Rating 8-10 6-7 1-5 Newer technologies like heat pump water heaters, solar PV, etc. (n=4) 4 0 0 8.8 The other programs offered by ENS (n=4) 1 2 1 7.3 Building envelope retrofit construction best practices (n=4) 1 1 2 6.3 HO...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to participation in residential energy efficiency programs, including the usefulness of various program components and technologies. Ratings are provided for different aspects of the program, highlighting areas such as newer technologies, program guidelines, and data collection processes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3.2.3 Barriers to Participation and Recommendations for Improvement The EAs offered diverse feedback regarding opportunities for ENS to increase the number of participants that register for...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses barriers to participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. Key barriers include the cost of upgrades and limited outreach. Recommendations include engaging real estate professionals, increasing incentives, and expanding marketing efforts. The report also highlights the importance of tools like the Energy Action Plan (EAP) to encourage participation.
those that are rarely implemented. This feedback highlights the importance and relevance of a tool such as the EAP. The other EAs did not offer any feedback about this matter. 3.2.4 Market Trends When looking at how energy efficiency has c...
AI summary The document discusses market trends in energy efficiency, noting increased awareness and adoption of energy-efficient products like heat pumps, improved insulation practices, and higher R-value requirements in new home construction compared to existing homes. These trends are observed through feedback from Energy Advisors.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report All the EAs believed that existing homes have greater potential for improving energy efficiency because they are probably not up to the current building code. The EAs suggested that ENS sho...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the potential for improving energy efficiency in existing homes and suggests additional measures such as PV panels and tankless water heaters. It also outlines the impact evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, focusing on gross and net energy savings.
ardless of why they participated.11 The Evaluator revised the gross savings tracked by ENS by reviewing the savings calculations by eligible measure category. 4.1.1 HEA Energy Efficiency Measures No new energy efficiency measures were made...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, noting that no new energy efficiency measures were introduced in 2017. The report outlines eligible upgrades and how savings are calculated using HOT2000 energy consumption modelling.
sumption Eligible HEA Upgrade Measures Modelling Being Used Modelling not Being Used to Calculate Savings to Calculate Savings Building Envelope Measures Attic Insulation x Cathedral Ceiling Insulation x Flat Roof Insulation x Basement Fou...
AI summary The document outlines eligible home energy assessment (HEA) upgrade measures and categorizes them into building envelope, space heating, and domestic water heating. It specifies which measures are used in savings calculations for impact evaluation, focusing on space heating and domestic water heating savings.
x For impact evaluation purposes, the savings calculation has been divided in two categories: space heating savings (including building envelope and space heating measures), and DHW savings. Home Energy Assessment 17 Existing Residential P...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating space heating savings under the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It uses the HOT2000 simulation to compare D and E modelled space heating consumption levels, adjusting for overestimation and separately accounting for savings from wood, pellet, or solar air equipment.
t is made to account for the savings separately since these upgrades are not modelled using HOT2000. Finally, the percentage of electric heating from the D assessment is applied to the overall result. This method was used in the tracking s...
AI summary The document discusses a method for calculating energy savings in residential programs, using the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) and HOT2000 software. An overestimation ratio of 16% is applied to adjust for overestimations in space heating consumption. The method was used in the 2017 evaluation and was developed by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and the Evaluator.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The billing analysis was performed for HEA participants between 2013 and 2015. The analysis for the period before the upgrades was made for 305 participants, while the analysis for the peri...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report analyzed billing data from HEA participants before and after upgrades, revealing an average overestimation ratio of 16 percent. The report also noted that wood and pellet space-heating equipment was not simulated in HOT2000, with savings values aligned to Green Heat evaluations. Adjustments were not made for electric baseboard systems.
blic Utility Commission,Technical Reference Manual, June 2016, (Section 2.2.1 –Electric HVAC) 13 Unitary savings values with electrical resistance should be divided by a COP of 2.1 rather than 2.0. Home Energy Assessment 19 Existing Reside...
AI summary The text references a technical adjustment to unitary savings values for electric HVAC systems, suggesting a COP of 2.1 instead of 2.0. It also mentions the Home Energy Assessment and the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Drain Water Heat Recovery ENS uses a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year. This value was determined in last year’s evaluation using the online calculator from the Center for Energy Ad...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) uses a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for drain water heat recovery (DWHR) systems. This value is based on assumptions about shower frequency, duration, flow rate, and water temperature, along with the configuration of the DWHR system used.
Oreo et al.,Residential End Uses of Water, AWWA Research Foundation, 1999,pp. 99-102. 16 Mayer, P. W., W. B. Oreo et al., Residential End Uses of Water, AWWA Research Foundation, 1999, pp. 99-102. Home Energy Assessment 21 Existing Residen...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of residential energy efficiency programs, focusing on the unitary savings value of solar domestic hot water (DHW) systems installed through the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program in 2017. The value was determined based on average system performance, with 39 systems installed through Green Heat between 2015 and 2017.
with the peak demand of the electricity system. The projected electricity demand peak period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. in the months of December to February on a non-holiday weekday. For HEA, peak demand savings were calc...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of peak demand savings using on-peak demand-to-energy ratios established by Navigant in the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. These ratios are based on local data and are used to estimate savings from space heating and DHW measures. The Evaluator validates the approach used by Navigant.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 4.1.5 Interactive Effects In a home, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy-efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other factors, such as heatin...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses interactive effects of energy-efficiency measures in homes, noting that space-heating measures are already accounted for in simulations, while DHW measures like DWHRs and solar systems have no interactive effects. HPWHs had negligible effects due to low installation numbers. The report also reviews effective useful life (EUL) values for program measures, relying on literature and reliable data sources.
mon values found in TRMs, evaluation reports or relevant studies. Those sources that based their EUL estimates on measured data or other reliable methods were preferred, whenever these were available. Table 13 presents the tracked and the...
AI summary The document discusses the use of Energy Use Life (EUL) values in calculating lifetime energy savings for building-envelope measures and space-heating systems, with a weighted average of revised EUL values applied. It references Table 13 and mentions the Home Energy Assessment and Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 13: Summary of Effective Useful Life Values by Measure Category ENS Tracked Revised Measure Reference EUL EUL Envelope Measure Attic Insulation Cathedral Ceiling Insulation Flat Roof...
AI summary This table from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report summarizes effective useful life values for various energy efficiency measures, referencing reports such as the GDS Measure Life Report and DEER 2014 EUL Table. It includes categories like insulation, air sealing, and heat pumps, with specific lifespans assigned to each measure.
w.culluminc.com/wp- content/uploads/2013/02/ASHRAE_Chart_HVAC_Life_Expectancy%201.pdf, (Last accessed February 28, 2018). 31 Database for Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER), DEER2014 EUL Table, 2014, https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated a weighted average EUL value of 20 years for space-heating measures, using data from building-envelope measures, heat pumps, and biomass measures to determine lifetime energy savings for these measures in the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
e Evaluator chose to use an EUL value of 20 years for both measures since this value is in line with the EUL value proposed in the Massachusetts report and the Ohio TRM. 4.1.7 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for HEA are pres...
AI summary The Evaluator used an EUL value of 20 years for energy efficiency measures, aligning with Massachusetts and Ohio reports. Adjustments to gross savings for HEA included revised unitary savings for heating equipment, solar DHW systems, and Green Heat deductions. Line loss factors were applied to estimate generator-level savings, resulting in 8.306 GWh and 2.348 MW annual energy and peak demand savings, with 166.116 GWh in lifetime savings.
ounted to 8.306 GWh and 2.348 MW respectively. Based on the revised EUL values for various types of measures, the 2017 annual gross energy savings represents 166.116 GWh in lifetime energy savings. Home Energy Assessment 27 Existing Reside...
AI summary The document provides data on energy savings from the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, including revised gross energy and peak demand savings. It references the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report and Efficiency Nova Scotia's existing residential program.
NTGR = (1 – % free-ridership + % internal spillover) By applying the free-ridership and spillover factors established for HEA, the NTGR value has been estimated at 0.76. Home Energy Assessment 29 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nov...
AI summary The document discusses the Net to Gross Ratio (NTGR) calculation, incorporating free-ridership and spillover factors from the Home Energy Assessment (HEA). It also addresses unconverted D assessment spillover savings, which are added to gross savings but not included in the NTGR calculation.
The 2017 unconverted D assessment spillover energy and peak demand savings for HEA were estimated at 0.632 GWh and 0.179 MW at the meter respectively. Detailed results are shown in Table 17 below. Home Energy Assessment 30 Existing Residen...
AI summary The 2017 unconverted D assessment spillover energy and peak demand savings for the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program were estimated at 0.632 GWh and 0.179 MW, respectively. The table provides detailed results, including the number of participants and average savings per participant.
7). Emera Inc., Management’s Discussion & Analysis As at February 10, 2017, http://investors.emera.com/Cache/1500095769.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&fid=1500095769&T=&iid=4072693 (Last accessed December 17, 2017) Home Energy Assessment 31 Existing Resi...
AI summary The document references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which includes a table evaluating net energy and peak demand savings for the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program.
the energy and peak demand savings established through this evaluation and those calculated in the tracking system. Table 19: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Adjusted Gross Initial Gross Savings NTGR Net Saving...
AI summary The document compares tracked and evaluated energy and peak demand savings from the ENS and Green Heat programs. The evaluation shows slight differences due to revised unitary savings and changes in the 2017 spillover level compared to 2016.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report 5 GREEN HEAT OVERVIEW The following sections present the Green Heat evaluation results. The evaluation results of the EPI program component follow. This section describes Green Heat, follows up on the 2016 evalua...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Green Heat program, which provides financial incentives for homeowners to reduce electricity use for heating. It outlines the program's goals, managed by ENS staff, and details the categories of heating systems eligible for rebates, including heat pumps, biomass, and solar thermal. The report also describes changes to the program starting in August 2017, dividing eligibility into old and new paths.
n Heat incentives under the new path. Table 20: New Path Incentives Heat Pump Equipment Incentive Mini-split Heat Pump $200/Refrigeration ton Air-source Heat Pump (Centrally Ducted) $400/Refrigeration ton Air-to-water Heat Pump $400/Refrig...
AI summary The text outlines new incentives for heat pump and biomass equipment under the 'New Path' program, including specific financial incentives per unit or refrigeration ton. It also references an existing residential program, 'Efficiency Nova Scotia,' and a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
ly heated homes for a few months in 2017, which resulted in a participation increase for this measure. Figure 9 breaks down all the measures installed through Green Heat since 2011 by measure type. Green Heat 36 Existing Residential Progra...
AI summary The Green Heat program, part of Efficiency Nova Scotia, saw participation increase in 2017 after homes were heated for a few months. However, gross energy savings decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 due to lower average savings from heat pumps, although peak demand savings increased.
on the use of the different energy sources available in these homes. The on-site visit sampling methodology and the protocol used to collect information are presented in Appendix XIII. Savings Review The Evaluator applied various methodolo...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to evaluate energy savings from biomass, solar thermal, and heat pump measures, as well as a price sensitivity analysis conducted with MSHP participants. It also references the number of participants and measures installed under the Green Heat program and mentions the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Billing Analysis A billing analysis was conducted for participants who had an MSHP or an ASHP installed in previous years to establish the average energy savings achieved. The billing analy...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia includes a billing analysis of energy savings from MSHP and ASHP installations and a review of Effective Useful Life (EUL) values. It also includes a phone survey of Green Heat participants to assess their experiences and recommendations for program improvements.
ess burdensome on contractors, participants, and ENS. According to ENS staff, the Green Heat market actors (contractors and participants) experienced three key interrelated problems with the old path: › Projects took a long time for a rela...
AI summary The existing Green Heat program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report is described as burdensome on contractors, participants, and ENS. The process was slow, confusing, and led to dissatisfaction due to pre-approval requirements and delays in project timelines.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The new path aimed to resolve the three key problems by requiring fewer actions by the market actors and removing the pre-approval stage. This has had the effect of removing ENS from involv...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's new DSM approach streamlines the process by removing pre-approval stages, allowing ENS to focus on approving installed measures and issuing rebates. The Green Heat program manager expressed optimism about improved efficiency, and the new path expands eligibility for heat pump installations regardless of pre-existing heating fuel type.
lower than $50,000. Most respondents (74%) were 45 years or older (Table 22). 41 From August 1 to November 20, 2017, incentives for centrally ducted heat pumps, air-to-water heat pumps and ground- source heat pumps were offered to non-elec...
AI summary The document discusses participant characteristics in an energy efficiency program, noting that most respondents were over 45 years old and that certain heat pump incentives were available until November 20, 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Outreach efforts by contractors have not changed much as a result of the new path. Of the 13 contractors aware of the new path, seven noted no change in outreach efforts, five indicated a m...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that outreach efforts by contractors have not significantly changed despite a new path. Contractors emphasize long-term savings and non-energy benefits as key selling points for energy-efficient equipment, though some note that incentives are not the strongest motivators for participants.
uential factor or perceived as a bonus among participants who opt for energy efficient equipment, which elevates participant satisfaction with the service, thus increasing the likelihood of referrals. Saving on energy costs was the most co...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that energy cost savings were the primary motivation for participants in the Green Heat program, particularly among new path participants. Other reasons included improving home efficiency, comfort, and replacing faulty systems or seeking air conditioning.
Table 25: Reasons Participants Decided to Install Energy Efficient Equipment Reason Percent (n=141) Save energy and money 57% Old system wasn't working properly 11% Wanted air conditioning 11% Make home more energy efficient 6% Comfort 4%...
AI summary A table shows the reasons participants installed energy-efficient equipment, with saving energy and money being the most common reason at 57%. Other reasons include system malfunction, desire for air conditioning, and environmental concerns, though these are less frequent.
4% 42 Statistically significant (z-test <.05) between old and new path participants. 7.4 Barriers and Participant Concerns For participants who had previously considered installing an MSHP, cost was the most prominent barrier hindering the...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to installing MSHPs, with cost being the primary concern. Participants indicated a price range of $4,070 to $6,250 as acceptable for MSHPs, which can inform incentive structures. A Z-Test was used to assess statistically significant differences in responses between groups.
valuation Report Table 28: Most Helpful Aspects of Green Heat Aspect Percent (n=141) Financial Aspects 54% Lower installation cost 40% Energy savings/efficient heating device 9% Financing option 5% Programmatic Assistance 32% Information p...
AI summary The report highlights that 54% of participants found financial aspects most helpful in the Green Heat program, with 40% citing lower installation costs. Contractors generally view the new path positively, citing a streamlined process and quicker approvals as key benefits.
th the new path, noted that the new path has been time consuming and frustrating for participants. The contractor specified that it has been difficult to get answers from ENS since Green Heat changed. Contacting ENS by phone was the most c...
AI summary Contractors have found the new Green Heat path time-consuming and frustrating due to difficulties in getting answers from ENS. They recommend increased outreach, simpler documentation, and expanded rebate-qualified equipment lists to improve the program.
13% Other 20% The majority (75%) of contractors reported being a member of the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN).43 Of these 15 contractors, eight reported benefiting from their association with the network. Of these eight, six described bene...
AI summary The majority of contractors are members of the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN), with some reporting benefits such as referrals and increased exposure. Some contractors suggested improvements to the ETN list, including ensuring quality and displaying specializations. However, some contractors on the ETN list were not found online.
ed their sales due to heightened awareness and demand for energy-efficient heating systems. The other 55 percent of contractors reported that Green Heat has neither helped nor hindered their business. Contractors were asked to provide some...
AI summary The Green Heat program has had mixed effects on contractors, with 45% reporting increased sales due to awareness of energy-efficient heating systems, while 55% saw no impact. Contractors noted that the program encourages participants to choose more efficient models, particularly those already considering MSHPs, though some found its influence limited.
Table 30: Participant Recommendations for Improving Green Heat Improvements Old Path (n=44) New Path (n=23) Advertise the program component more or in a better way 27% 52% Offer more information and flexibility on the eligibility requireme...
AI summary The text presents participant recommendations for improving the Green Heat program, highlighting a statistically significant increase in support for better advertising and more flexible eligibility requirements in the 'New Path' group compared to the 'Old Path' group. The data is drawn from an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 8 GREEN HEAT IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2017 Green Heat impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings achieved. 8.1 Gross Savings...
AI summary The 2017 Green Heat impact evaluation assesses the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings from the program. On-site visits were conducted for biomass, heat pump, and solar measures, with a focus on MSHPs and ASHPs. The peak demand savings period is defined as the coldest days between December and February.
ry since no such installations had been performed by the time the on-site visits were conducted in November. Similarly, no on-site visits were conducted for HPWHs given the limited quantity installed. The on-site visits served to verify en...
AI summary The on-site visits were conducted to verify energy savings by confirming the proper installation and operation of rebated equipment. No visits were conducted for HPWHs due to limited installations. Additional information was gathered on heating systems and equipment usage.
M Evaluation Report Table 31: On-site Visits by Measure Category Measure Category Measure Number of On-site Visits Wood stove 2 Biomass Pellet stove 1 Wood Furnace or Boiler 1 Air-source heat pump 5 Ground-source heat pump 1 Heat Pump Mini...
AI summary The report details on-site visits for biomass and heat pump measures, confirming that new biomass equipment serves as the primary heating source, with electric baseboards as secondary. Heat pump installations were also evaluated, with no issues reported by participants.
ons were performed by Wood Energy Technology Transfer certified professionals, as required by Green Heat, and participants indicated no issues with the new biomass heating systems. Heat Pump Measures The Evaluator confirmed that the new he...
AI summary The evaluation of the Green Heat program found that biomass heating systems were successfully installed with no issues reported. Heat pumps were primarily used as the main heating source in most homes, though some had secondary systems. One participant had a heat pump installed on the main floor, but it was not eligible under the program due to the existing heating system being a wood stove. The ENS application process was noted as clear and not an oversight.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The on-site visits revealed that the GSHP and MSHPs were installed and operating correctly. Conversely, three of the five ASHP visits revealed installation issues. In two cases, the issues...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that GSHPs were installed correctly, while ASHPs encountered installation issues, including inadequate heating and blowing cool air during heating mode. The report also notes challenges in identifying the correct model number for a GSHP unit.
alysis and HOT2000 energy modelling to reflect the typical annual heating consumption values of actual 2012 program component participants. These values, listed in Table 33, have been used since 2013. Table 33: Tracked Unitary Savings Valu...
AI summary The document discusses the use of energy modelling and tracked unitary savings values for wood and pellet furnaces and boilers since 2013, including adjustments for electrical resistance and references to a 2010 report on a residential fuel substitution pilot program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Revised Savings A literature review focused on identifying updated technical references, metering studies and/or comparable billing analyses was carried out for wood and pellet boilers and...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the maintenance of revised savings for wood and pellet boilers, solar domestic hot water systems, and solar air heaters. It notes the lack of updated studies and the continued use of RETScreen energy models for calculating savings. Peak demand savings for solar systems are zero due to solar equipment not operating during peak periods.
t Table 36: Definition of the Variables and their Numerical Values – MSHP Acronym Unit Variable Value/Source
AI summary The text presents Table 36, which defines variables and their numerical values related to MSHP (Mini-Split Heat Pump). The table includes acronyms, units, variable names, and corresponding values or sources.
Specification data for each installed system (Air conditioning, Heating Btu/h Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump and Refrigeration Institute [AHRI] Certified Value) Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump Specification data fo...
AI summary The document provides technical specifications for installed heating and cooling systems, including rated capacities, performance factors, and energy efficiency ratios for heat pumps and air conditioning units, referencing AHRI certified values and PUC TRM standards.
C system Central AC: 13 Room AC: 11.3 Seasonal energy efficiency ratio for the Specification data for each installed Btu/W·h new equipment system (AHRI Certified Value) h/year Full heating load hours 2,280 (Minnesota TRM) h/year Full cooli...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency calculations for homes with MSHPs, noting differences in savings based on whether homes are electrically heated. It references a billing analysis conducted in 2017 with more participants and longer post-installation periods than the 2016 evaluation.
ublic Utility Commission (PUC), Technical Reference Manual, June 2015, Section 2.2 – HVAC. 51 Fully electrically heated households correspond to households that are 100 percent electrically heated. Green Heat 68 Existing Residential Progra...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia analyzed electrical consumption data from 292 participants before and after the installation of Mini-Split Heat Pumps (MSHPs). A regression model based on the Princeton Scorekeeping Method was used to compare energy consumption changes.
ld have had an effect on base consumption. 52 Government of Canada, Station Results - 1981-2010 Climate Normals and Averages, http://climate.weather.gc.ca. These data are updated every 10 years. Green Heat 69 Existing Residential Program E...
AI summary The analysis of the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report excluded participants with non-functional heat pumps and applied statistical criteria to ensure the validity of the results, retaining 170 out of 292 initial participants.
y value within two standard deviations of the average (10 participants removed) Of the 292 participants available at the beginning of the analysis, 170 were thus retained for the final analysis. A billing analysis performed on an extended...
AI summary The analysis of 170 participants showed that households with secondary non-electrical heating systems had lower energy savings from MSHPs compared to fully electrically heated households. Energy savings values were calculated as 0.179 kWh/Btu/h for fully electrically heated households and 0.060 kWh/Btu/h for mainly electrically heated households.
holds respectively. The average EFLH value for all participants included in the billing analysis (118 fully electrically heated household and 52 mainly electrically heated households) is 668 hours. Green Heat 71 Existing Residential Progra...
AI summary The evaluation report compares EFLH values from billing analyses and metering studies, noting that cold climate heat pumps in Massachusetts had EFLH values similar to the average of 668 hours found in Nova Scotia's billing analysis, despite some units not being used regularly during heating seasons.
ured using electrical billing data prior to the installation of the heat pump. 54 The Cadmus Group, Inc., Ductless Mini-Split Heat Pump Impact Evaluation, Prepared for the Electric and Gas Program Administrators of Massachusetts and Rhode...
AI summary The evaluation report considers basecase scenarios for non-electrically heated households under the Green Heat program, assessing how different participant behaviors affect energy savings based on whether they would have purchased a heat pump, switched to electrical heating, or kept their existing non-electrical heating system.
ectrical heating system in the absence of the program, then the purchase of a high-efficiency heat pump results in increased electricity consumption and therefore negative electricity savings. For the basecase scenario, the decision to pur...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of a high-efficiency heat pump on electricity consumption in non-electrically heated households, and how survey responses were used to establish a basecase for evaluating free-ridership in the Green Heat program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report There is, however, the possibility that a small number of participants might have purchased a heat pump sooner than anticipated because of influence from Green Heat since four participants...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report notes that some participants may have purchased heat pumps earlier due to Green Heat, potentially leading to negative savings in the initial years. More research is needed to confirm this impact, and no adjustments were made in the evaluation.
nil (i.e. the overall energy savings impact from non-electrical participants would be positive if only 19% of participants would have waited to purchase their heat pump in the absence of Green Heat). The Evaluator also considered the impac...
AI summary The evaluation of the Green Heat program considers the impact of early heat pump purchases on energy savings, noting that even with some participants buying heat pumps earlier, lifetime energy savings remain positive. However, there is uncertainty about the extent of any savings decrease, and the Evaluator recommends more precise quantification of negative savings in the future.
or all non-electrically heated households, the Evaluator used the previously defined general heat pump energy savings algorithms to calculate annual energy savings and peak demand savings, as follows: 1 1 ∗ – ∗ 1 1 ∗ 3.412 _ _ Capacities a...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to calculate energy and peak demand savings for non-electrically heated households using MSHPs. It outlines the use of specific efficiency levels and capacities for MSHPs, referencing federal energy efficiency regulations and baseline efficiency standards.
Canada, Single-Phase and Three-Phase Split-System Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes-standards/products/6895, (Last accessed December 4, 2017). Green Heat 76 Existing Residential Progra...
AI summary The evaluation of the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia found that 62% of participants using MSHPs still use non-electrical heating systems, while 38% use only electrical systems. The EFLH value was calculated as 528 based on billing analysis and survey results.
Specification data for each installed Btu/h Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump system (AHRI Certified Value) Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump Specification data for each installed Btu/h at an outdoor air temperature of...
AI summary The text provides technical specifications for heat pump systems, including heating and cooling capacities, seasonal performance factors, and efficiency ratios. It references certified values from AHRI and the PUC TRM, indicating a focus on performance metrics for energy efficiency programs.
a savings-per-installed-capacity value within two standard deviations of the average (three participants removed) The 37 remaining participants were categorized based on type of heating system: 1 Fully electrically heated with no secondary...
AI summary The text discusses the categorization of 37 participants based on their heating systems and presents average energy savings per installed capacity for each category. The analysis excludes three participants whose savings-per-installed-capacity values fall outside two standard deviations of the average.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Given the small sample sizes, it is difficult to establish distinct unitary savings for any of these categories. However, it seems that participants who do not have a secondary heating syst...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report notes that small sample sizes make it difficult to determine distinct unitary savings. Participants without secondary heating systems showed higher savings, and further analysis is recommended for those with secondary heat pumps. ASHPs in homes without secondary heating systems achieved significant energy savings, with EFLH estimated at 842 hours.
io than for the fully electrically heated participants in the present study. 62 Cadmus and IESO, Evaluation of Verifying Cold Climate Air Source Heat Pumps in Electrically Heated Residential Homes in Ontario, Canada, Poster presented at th...
AI summary The evaluation of air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) in residential homes found that cooling degree days (CDD) were not effective in predicting energy consumption. A unitary savings value of 0.101 kWh/Btu/h was used to revise savings estimates for ASHPs, based on participants with fully electric heating systems. The small sample size of non-electrical heating participants led to their exclusion from the analysis.
ctrical resistance heating system › Would have kept their non-electrical heating system 63 142 centrally-ducted air-to-air heat pumps and one centrally-ducted air-to-water heat pump in 2017. Green Heat 82 Existing Residential Program Effic...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for different scenarios involving heat pump installations under the Efficiency Nova Scotia program. It highlights how savings vary based on whether participants replace non-electrical systems with heat pumps or keep their existing systems, impacting electricity consumption.
mand savings value of 3.04 kW since such parameters were not tracked in 2017. Table 42 presents the unitary savings values obtained for each category, as well as the average unitary savings value. Green Heat 83 Existing Residential Program...
AI summary The document discusses unitary savings values for air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) in non-electrically heated households, as calculated in Table 42 of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia.
66 Minnesota Department of Commerce – Division of Energy Resources “State of Minnesota Technical Reference Manual for Energy Conservation Improvement Programs – Version 2” Effective January 1, 2017. Green Heat 84 Existing Residential Progr...
AI summary The document references a technical manual from the Minnesota Department of Commerce and discusses efficiency programs, including a table related to Ground-Source Heat Pump (GSHP) parameters and their numerical values.
a for each installed kW/kW heat pump system Unitless Derating factor from PUC TRM 0.885 Factor to determine the HSPF of a GSHP 3.412 Btu/W·h based on its COP Unitless Factor used to determine the SEER of a GSHP 1.02 based on its EER PUC TR...
AI summary The text provides technical data and reference factors related to heat pump efficiency, including derating factors, energy efficiency ratios, and load hours based on the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's Technical Reference Manual. It includes values for GSHP, AC systems, and cooling penalties.
No AC in baseline = 0 67 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), “Technical Reference Manual”, June 2015, Section 2.2 – HVAC. Green Heat 85 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Revised Saving...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings for Ground-Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) and the challenges in updating savings estimates based on existing studies. It highlights differences in operational characteristics between ASHPs and GSHPs and questions the applicability of previous findings.
ulated the difference in electricity consumption between the pre-installation and post- installation periods. The Evaluator also analyzed the annual electricity consumption prior to GSHP installation. Electricity savings were obtained for...
AI summary The evaluation analyzed electricity consumption before and after GSHP installation, finding significant savings for five of nine participants. Results for others were not statistically significant, possibly due to existing central heat pumps. The analysis focused on four participants without prior central heat pumps.
tia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 44: Analysis of Electricity Consumption for Participants who Installed GSHPs Existing Heating Systems Average Annual Annual Energy Consumption Existing Savings as per Participant Before Primary Heating...
AI summary Table 44 presents an analysis of electricity consumption for participants who installed GSHPs (Ground-Source Heat Pumps) and compares their energy usage before installation with savings. The data includes various heating systems and their associated energy consumption and savings.
esponds to the number of hours a three-ton GSHP would need to operate to meet a heating load of 14,600 kWh. For peak demand savings, the Evaluator used the same methodology as for tracked savings. Green Heat 87 Existing Residential Program...
AI summary This section discusses interactive effects and effective useful life (EUL) in the context of the Green Heat program. It explains that high-efficiency heating measures do not change heating or cooling loads, except for heat pump water heaters (HPWHs), where interactive effects are already accounted for. EUL values were reviewed based on literature and reliable data sources for the 2017 evaluation.
ing homes with an existing heat pump as the baseline, where the savings are 4,480 kWh. 82 Excluding participating homes with an existing heat pump as the baseline, where the savings are 4,226 kWh. Green Heat 90 Existing Residential Program...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from various heat pump measures in residential programs, comparing tracked and revised unitary savings values. It highlights the performance of different heat pump types, including MSHP and ASHP, and their impact on energy efficiency.
1.903 91.027 Peak Demand Savings Tracked Peak Demand Savings (MW) 2.380 0.916 0.019 0.225 0.000 0.047 3.883 Adjustment Ratio for Peak Demand Savings 0.982 0.978 40.890 N/A N/A 1.117 - Revised Unitary Peak Demand Savings (kW) N/A N/A N/A 3....
AI summary The document discusses the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) in the context of the Green Heat program, explaining that it accounts for free-ridership effects to determine reliable energy savings attributed to the program component.
ut energy efficiency. Using this approach, the free-ridership level was established at 36 percent for biomass and solar measures, which is the same as 2016’s results (36%). Central Heat Pump Measure For centrally ducted heat pump measures,...
AI summary The document evaluates free-ridership levels for various energy efficiency measures, including biomass, solar, central heat pumps, and MSHPs. Free-ridership levels were established at 36% for biomass and solar, and 44% for central heat pumps, similar to 2016 results. The evaluation used updated questionnaires to assess participant decisions and influences on installation choices.
ystem (type-of-system factor); and (2) a second series of questions regarding the participant decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump rather than a regular heat pump (high- efficiency factor). Participants who installed MSHPs were...
AI summary The document discusses survey questions related to participants' decisions to install high-efficiency heat pumps, including factors like system type and previous participation in energy efficiency programs. It also outlines how free-ridership levels were calculated for non-electrically heated households under the new path, resulting in a 33 percent free-ridership rate for high-efficiency heat pumps.
051 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.001 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.141 0.056 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.001 Green Heat 98 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM...
AI summary This excerpt from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia presents data on energy and peak demand savings from various heat pump programs, including MSHP and ASHP. It includes metrics such as Revised Gross Energy Savings, Net Energy Savings, and Line Loss Factor.
.083 0.154 0.012 0.039 2.711 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 - Net Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) 1.889 0.243 0.091 0.170 0.013 0.043 2.980 Effective Useful Life (years) 18 18 18 18 18 25 - Net Lifetime Energy...
AI summary The text presents numerical data comparing energy and peak demand savings from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report to those calculated in the tracking sheet, highlighting metrics such as Net Energy Savings, Net Lifetime Energy Savings, and Net Peak Demand Savings.
. This difference mainly results from the adjustment made for participants who installed an MSHP or an ASHP in non-electrically heated households, for which ENS had tracked nil peak demand savings. Green Heat 100 Existing Residential Progr...
AI summary The document discusses the evolution of the MSHP market in Nova Scotia, noting changes reported by contractors and the need for ENS to adapt program offerings. It highlights the difficulty in assessing market adoption due to insufficient data.
ctrically heated homes, whereas only electrically heated homes qualified for this incentive prior to August 2017. 83 Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations – Fifth Edition, August 16, 2003 Green Heat 101 Existing Residential Program E...
AI summary The document discusses the growth of heat pump market share in Nova Scotia, noting an increase from 6% in 2013 to 11% in 2015, with electric baseboard heaters declining slightly. It also mentions the evaluation of Green Heat's incentives and market indicators related to MSHPs.
Table 53: Share of Primary Heating Systems in Nova Scotia 2013 2015 Forced Air Furnaces 31% 24% Electric Baseboard Heaters 29% 28% Heating Stoves 7% 6% Boilers with Hot Water or Steam Radiators 23% 24% Electric Radiant Heating 3% 2% Heat P...
AI summary The text provides data on the share of primary heating systems in Nova Scotia in 2013 and 2015, and discusses the Green Heat program's eligibility criteria for multi-split heat pumps (MSHPs), which were updated in August 2017 to target higher efficiency systems with specific HSPF thresholds.
ponent targets a subset of high-efficiency MSHPs that provide the greatest savings. 84 Systems with an HSPF below 9.565 may still be admitted to the program if equipped with a drain pan heater. Green Heat 102 Existing Residential Program E...
AI summary The Green Heat program incentivizes high-efficiency MSHP systems, with eligibility criteria based on HSPF. In 2017, the program expanded to include participants with non-electrically heated homes, leading to a significant increase in the number of incented systems.
2015, MSHPs were only offered in the last three months of the year. MSHP systems include all indoor and outdoor units per participant (i.e. the number of participants equals the number of systems). The efficiency of the MSHP units has not...
AI summary The efficiency of MSHP units has not increased significantly since 2015, with the average HSPF decreasing slightly from 10.86 in 2015 to 10.27 in 2017. While the maximum efficiency of units incented through Green Heat has increased slightly, there is very little change in the overall efficiency of the incented units over the period.
has increased somewhat over time (from 12.34 to 13.04), there is very little change in the overall efficiency of the incented units over the period. 9.2.3 Market Share of High-efficiency MSHPs The Evaluator interviewed contractors who sell...
AI summary The text discusses the market share of high-efficiency MSHPs in Nova Scotia, noting that 90% of sales by interviewed contractors would have qualified for Green Heat, though this may be overestimated due to eligibility changes in August 2017. The data comes from the 2017 ENS Green Heat Tracking Sheet.
Heat pumps were the primary heating source in 11% of Nova Scotia homes in 2015, up from 6% in 2013. Data on secondary sources were unavailable. Market share of heat Participating contractors reported that efficient MSHPs (i.e. Green Heat p...
AI summary Heat pumps have seen increased adoption in Nova Scotia homes, with 11% using them in 2015. High-efficiency models dominate sales, though eligibility changes may impact this trend. Contractors note price and market competition as factors influencing consumer choices. Building codes still consider electric resistance heating as the minimum efficiency standard for small residential buildings.
or updates to near-term code or standard requirements for heat pumps in the latest federal energy efficiency regulations and no known plans to make heat pumps mandatory. Market readiness of more efficient substitute Not applicable technolo...
AI summary The text discusses the market readiness of more efficient heat pump technologies, specifically MSHPs, and highlights the ongoing evolution of the market. It also notes the influence of the Green Heat program and the need for further data to assess market adoption. The EPI program and its evaluation are also briefly mentioned.
ed for upgrades that reduce the use of other fuels, but is only offered to low-income participants. This report only presents the evaluation results regarding the electricity ratepayer portion of EPI. EPI aimed to achieve 24.4 GWh in net e...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program aimed to achieve 24.4 GWh in net electricity savings and 3.6 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator for 2017. The report follows up on recommendations from the 2016 evaluation of the Residential Program and Residential Demand Improvement (RDI) program components, indicating that several recommendations have been implemented.
roducts were installed in 2017, which was 10 percent less than in 2016. 88 The number of EPI participants refers to the number of participants generating electrical savings and this number has been established based on the number of unique...
AI summary The text discusses participation in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program and related residential programs in 2017, noting a 10% decrease in installations compared to 2016. It also references the number of EPI participants based on unique participant reference numbers.
2016 2017 EPI MURB/RP&C RDI RDI RP&C EPI Although a smaller number of households participated in EPI in 2017, the number of products installed per participant was higher (with a mean of 27.6 products in 2017, compared to a mean of 25 produ...
AI summary In 2017, the EPI program saw a decrease in the number of participants but an increase in the average number of products installed per participant, attributed to more participants living in single-family homes. A-type lamp replacements declined due to fewer incandescent lamps and increased adoption of energy-efficient lighting technologies. The program has contributed to the growth of energy-efficient lighting in Nova Scotia since 2012.
i-Unit Residential Building (MURB) program component became the RP&C program component in 2014. 91 EPI’s guidelines require that all installed lighting products replace existing incandescent lamps. Efficient Product Installation 109 Existi...
AI summary The EPI program achieved 19.439 GWh gross energy savings in 2017, with per-participant savings at 1.421 MWh. However, these savings were lower than those from RDI and RP&C in previous years, and peak demand savings dropped significantly due to methodological refinements.
blish peak demand savings. Figure 18: Summary of Gross Savings in RDI and RP&C and EPI Gross Energy Savings (GWh) Gross Peak Demand Savings (MW) 50 12 45 40 10 35 8 30 25 6 20 15 4 10 2 5 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 2013 2014 20...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation methodology for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, including data collection activities. It also references energy savings and peak demand reductions from the RDI and RP&C programs.
ly assigned an NTGR of 1. All low-income participants were removed from the EPI survey sample so that the levels of free-ridership and spillover could be determined for EPI using the survey results. Efficient Product Installation 112 Exist...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the unitary savings review and effective useful life review for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Literature reviews and engineering calculations were used to assess savings values and EUL for different product types.
=100) 9.5 The time required to complete work (n=90) 9.5 The information received about energy efficiency 9.5 products (n=66) Energy-efficient products installed (n=100) 9.2 Base: Respondents who received information during the visit from t...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2017 DSM program in Nova Scotia found that 11% of participants had issues with installed energy-efficient products, primarily smart power strips and LED bulbs. Problems included smart power strips turning off televisions and LED bulbs flickering.
ot water tank wrap and showerheads. According to participants, the main problem with the smart power strips was that they kept turning the television off; they also mentioned that LED bulbs flickered. Two in 10 participants started adoptin...
AI summary The document discusses participant feedback on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, noting issues with smart power strips and LED bulbs, as well as increased energy-efficient behaviors among participants. It also outlines the evaluation of energy savings from the 2017 EPI program.
uator to accurately establish the savings associated with the products installed through EPI in 2017. The single-family households’ and the apartments’ unitary savings values are presented separately. The tracked savings are generally base...
AI summary The document discusses the tracking of energy savings from LED lamps installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, including the displacement of wattage from old lamps and the introduction of new 11 W LED lamps. It also mentions a pilot project for new construction lighting using 9 W LED lamps with a specific savings value.
before occupancy. All the lamps installed through this pilot were 9 W LED lamps and ENS applied a unitary savings value of 50.3 kWh per year, with a displaced wattage of 51 W (9 W replacing 60 W). Efficient Product Installation 116 Existin...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It details the use of 9 W LED lamps replacing 40 W and 60 W bulbs, with unitary savings values of 30.6 kWh/year and 50.3 kWh/year respectively. The calculation uses an average daily usage of 2.7 hours based on the Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study.
30.6 30.6 9 W replacing 60 W 50.3 50.3 9 W replacing 100 W 89.7 89.7 9.5 W replacing 40 W 30.1 30.1 9.5 W replacing 60 W 49.8 49.8 9.5 W replacing 100 W 89.2 89.2 11 W replacing 60 W 48.3 48.3 18 W replacing 75 W 56.2 56.2 18 W replacing 1...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings from replacing traditional light bulbs with more efficient alternatives, such as LED bulbs. It also references a study by NMR Group Inc. and DNV GL on residential lighting hours-of-use, which was used to revise unitary savings values for energy efficiency calculations.
e Evaluator analyzed the displaced wattage calculations and reviewed the hours of operation. 95 NMR Group Inc. and DNV GL, Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study, May 5, 2014, p. 69. Efficient Product Installation 117 Existing R...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of displaced wattage in the context of energy efficiency programs, referencing the replacement of traditional lamps with LED lamps. It notes that the baseline wattage for new construction was set at 60 W due to the developer's initial plan, and confirms the appropriateness of ENS's displaced wattage calculations for existing residential buildings.
riate for the pilot. The Evaluator concludes that all the displaced wattage values calculated by ENS for existing residential buildings are appropriate for this year’s evaluation. Hours of Operation The Residential Lighting Evaluation Prot...
AI summary The Evaluator confirms that the displaced wattage values calculated for residential buildings are appropriate. The study found that the NERHOU study's HOU value of 2.7 hours/day is suitable for LED lamps installed through EPI, considering both indoor and outdoor usage. The HOU for single-family homes and apartments is the same, and unitary savings values in Table 58 are still valid.
in Table 58 are still appropriate and correspond to the revised unitary savings. 96 NREL, Uniform Methods Protocol Chapter 6 : Residential Lighting Evaluation Protocol, February 2014, pp. 6-20. Efficient Product Installation 118 Existing R...
AI summary The document discusses the revision of unitary savings for LED nightlights and holiday lights installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Savings were recalculated based on updated wattage values and operational hours, reflecting more accurate energy efficiency data.
oliday lights. Based on the evaluation results in the 2015 LED Holiday Light Exchange Report, ENS established the savings of each set of LED lights at 29.4 kWh in its tracking system. Revised Savings To update the unitary savings values us...
AI summary The report discusses the revised unitary savings value for LED holiday lights, changing from 29.4 kWh to 43.6 kWh, based on updated data from 2017. It also outlines assumptions about the number of sets replaced by participants and suggests validation methods for 2018 savings.
savings, the Evaluator suggests that participants be questioned through a participant survey or during on-site visits in 2018 if ENS offers this measure again in 2018. The Proportion of Sets Replaced New data collected in 2017 was used to...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends surveying participants or conducting on-site visits in 2018 to assess savings if the ENS program is repeated. Data from 2017 was used to update the proportion of old incandescent bulbs replaced, with 37% being long large bulbs, 32% long mini, and 31% short mini. The number of bulbs per set was based on 2014 data, as no new studies were found.
again this year. Table 60: Average Number of Lamps on Each Set by Category Category of Incandescent Set Average Number of Lamps per Set Long Large Incandescent Bulbs 35 Long Mini Incandescent Bulbs 50 Short Mini Incandescent Bulbs 20 Effic...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of displaced wattage and hours of operation for LED light sets in the 2017 Efficiency Nova Scotia DSM Evaluation Report. It references literature reviews and survey data to establish parameters for calculating unitary savings values.
tioned above, the unitary savings values were calculated for the 2017 evaluation and are listed in Table 61 below. Table 61: Revised Unitary Savings Value for Each Type of LED Light Set Parameter Value Proportion of Old Large Incandescent...
AI summary The text provides calculations related to energy savings from replacing old incandescent light sets with new LED sets. It includes proportions of returned sets, wattage of old and new sets, displaced wattage, annual hours of operation, and the resulting unitary energy savings value per exchange.
2 sets × 94.0 W × 232 h/yr = 43.6 Unitary Energy Savings Value (per exchange) kWh/year Efficient Product Installation 121 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 13.1.4 Faucet Aerators Tracked Savings...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary energy savings values for faucet aerators installed in single-family homes and apartments, based on evaluations from 2014 and 2016. These values are calculated using a custom equation that considers flow rate reduction, total domestic hot water consumption, and the number of faucet aerators per home.
(kWh/year) (kWh/year) Faucet Aerator 98 95 13.1.5 Low-flow Showerheads Tracked Savings As presented in Table 63, for single-family homes, ENS uses unitary savings values of 369 kWh, 553 kWh or 738 kWh for low-flow showerheads (or shower wa...
AI summary This section discusses the energy savings from low-flow showerheads in single-family homes and apartments. Unitary savings values are provided for different flow reductions, calculated using a custom DHW consumption equation based on evaluations from 2014 and 2016.
ontrollers for Audiovisual Equipment Tracked Savings Since 2013, ENS has used a unitary savings value of 411 kWh per year for the installation of a smart power controller for audio-visual equipment. This unitary savings value is based on a...
AI summary Since 2013, ENS has used a unitary savings value of 411 kWh per year for smart power controllers for audiovisual equipment. This value was based on a South African study and validated by the Victorian State Government. In 2015, the Evaluator confirmed this value was appropriate but noted that homes with more than two controllers may have reduced savings, recommending a limit of two controllers per home.
er of smart power controllers installed in each home should be limited to two. 98 Karebo Systems, Audiovisual Standby Power Controller: Energy Savings Field Trial, South Africa - June-August 2012, Field trial data analysis, March 6, 2013....
AI summary The document discusses the efficiency of smart power controllers in homes, referencing field trial data and energy savings from product installations. It also outlines tracked and revised unitary savings values for different product types in single-family homes and apartments.
265 207 0.75 GPM 553 354 398 310 1.0 GPM 738 472 531 413 Pipe Insulation (per foot) 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 Hot Water Tank Wraps 131 159 118 118 Smart Power Controller 411 411 411 411 for Audiovisual Equipment Efficient Product Installation 12...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted 110 on-site visits to verify the installation rates of efficiency products under the Existing Residential Program. Installation ratios were calculated by comparing recorded and verified numbers, with margins of error assessed for reliability.
smart power controllers. These results are comparable to the typical installation rates documented over the past few years, thus indicating that EPI’s product installation rates have remained stable. Like in previous years, the Evaluator i...
AI summary The report discusses the installation rates of energy-efficient products, noting that EPI's rates have remained stable over recent years. It highlights discrepancies in wattage values of installed LED lamps and addresses an outlier in pipe insulation installation rates, which were adjusted for accuracy in the gross savings calculation.
this type of product through EPI. 101 The installation rate remained at 106% because the outlier’s savings were small in comparison to the total savings of all the other pipe insulation projects. Efficient Product Installation 128 Existing...
AI summary The document discusses the installation rates and peak demand savings for energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It notes that installation rates for pipe insulation remained high due to minimal outlier impact and that LED holiday lights had a 100% installation rate. Peak demand savings were calculated using ratios from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, except for lighting products, which used measured data from a residential study.
was established at 1.509 W/kWh. Table 67 below lists the peak-demand-to-energy ratios established for each category of measure. These ratios are applicable to both single-family homes and apartments. Table 67: Peak-demand-to-energy Ratios...
AI summary The document provides peak-demand-to-energy ratios for various energy efficiency measures, including lighting products and insulation. It also discusses interactive effects, such as how replacing lighting with LEDs can impact heating and cooling loads in a home.
ng were used instead of the overall percentage of homes using electric heating, heat pump heating, and air-conditioning. The percentages were updated based on the information in the tracking sheet. Efficient Product Installation 131 Existi...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of interactive effects factors for heating and lighting products within the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It details how the efficiency of heat pumps was factored into the calculation, adjusting the interactive effects factor based on the coefficient of performance (COP) of the heat pumps used.
eractive effects factor of -24.0 percent for buildings electrically heated with a heat pump. Table 68 lists the interactive effects factor calculation results for lighting products installed indoors. Table 68: Interactive Effects Calculati...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects factor for different heating and air-conditioning scenarios in buildings with LED products installed indoors. The weighted interactive effects factor is calculated as -17.7% for energy and -40.4% for peak demand.
nditioning 44% 0% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -17.7% -40.4% These interactive effects occur only when the products are installed inside the building. Since LED A- type lamps installed through the program component are also...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects of LED lighting products installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, noting that outdoor installations affect energy and peak demand savings. The proportions are based on data from the 2017 EPI tracking report and assumptions about installation locations.
53% -8.4% -19.1% The interactive effect factors were then applied to the peak-demand-to-energy ratios for lighting products, as shown in Table 70 below. 108 Table 70: Adjusted Peak-demand-to-energy Ratios by Lighting Product Type Interacti...
AI summary The text presents adjusted peak-demand-to-energy ratios for various lighting products after applying interactive effect factors. The ratios show significant reductions in both peak demand and energy savings for different types of LED lamps, with the most dramatic changes observed in LED holiday lights.
E12 LED lamps. 108 Adjusted peak-demand-to-energy ratio = peak-demand-to-energy ratio × (1 + interactive effects factor for peak demand savings) / (1 + interactive effects factor for energy savings) Efficient Product Installation 133 Exist...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of adjusted peak-demand-to-energy ratios, incorporating interactive effects factors for peak demand and energy savings. It also details the methodology used in the 2015 RP&C evaluation for determining energy interactive effects factors for DHW measures, noting differences between apartments and single-family homes.
gs since DHW tanks are more likely to be in the air-conditioned living space than in single-family homes, where DHW tanks are more likely to be in the basement, where no air-conditioning is installed. Table 71 lists the updated interactive...
AI summary The text discusses the updated interactive effects factors for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps, based on the 2017 tracking report. It highlights the differences in energy effects during heating and cooling periods for various types of homes and heating systems, such as heat pumps and electric heating.
40% × 2/12 =6.7% air-conditioning Apartments, electric heating, without 6.2% -90% × 8/12 = -60.0% 0% × 2/12 = 0.0% air-conditioning Apartments, no electric heating, yet with 2.3% 0% × 8/12 = 0.0% 40% × 2/12 = 6.7% air-conditioning Apartmen...
AI summary The document discusses the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for energy efficiency measures under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program component, as reviewed by the Evaluator during the 2017 evaluation of the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS).
calculated as the ratio between the manufacturers’ rated lifetime hours for the most popular models of lamps installed under EPI, and the annual HOU value used for unitary savings values calculations. Table 73: Equipment Life Value per LED...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of equipment life value for different LED lamp types under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, using manufacturers' rated lifetime hours and annual HOU values. It references Table 73, which provides specific data on LED lamp lifetimes and their corresponding equipment life in years.
remain the baseline, the baseline is increased to halogen incandescent lamps. 114 Illinois Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Advisory Group, Illinois Statewide Technical Reference Manual for Energy Efficiency Version 6.0, Volume 3, February 20...
AI summary The text discusses the baseline for halogen incandescent lamps and references several technical manuals and regulations related to energy efficiency. It also mentions an evaluation report on an existing residential energy efficiency program in Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report › The next anticipated regulation expected to be imposed in the USA by federal legislation will impose an efficiency level of 45 lumens per watt in 2020118, as shown in the following table....
AI summary The text discusses U.S. and Canadian lighting efficiency regulations, particularly the EISA 2007 mandate requiring 45 lumens per watt by 2020 and Canada's planned alignment through Amendment 16 to its Energy Efficiency Regulations. It notes the phasing out of halogen incandescent bulbs and the expected impact on the market.
tocks are depleted. The displaced wattage values for replaced light bulbs of 40 W, 60 W and 100 W during the EUL of LEDs and their annual average displaced wattage values are shown in Table 74 below. Table 74: Baseline Evolution during the...
AI summary The text presents displaced wattage values for replacing 40 W, 60 W, and 100 W light bulbs with LED A19 lamps over their effective useful life, comparing baseline values for halogen incandescent, Canadian CFL equivalent, and American CFL equivalent lamps.
gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes- standards/18318 (Last accessed January 24, 2018). 120 Natural Resources Canada. Energy Efficiency Regulations. General Service Lamps and Modified Spectrum Incandescent Lamps, www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulatio...
AI summary The document references energy efficiency regulations and standards, particularly those related to General Service Lamps and Modified Spectrum Incandescent Lamps, as imposed by U.S. federal legislation. It also discusses the calculation of equivalent EUL (Equivalent Useful Life) for determining lifetime energy savings under the Efficient Product Installation program.
gen and LED reflector lamps, it is recommended to cap the equivalent EUL of reflector lamps at seven years. Table 75: Baseline Evolution during the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps Halogen Baseline CFL Equivalent Baseline – Ame...
AI summary The text discusses recommendations for capping the equivalent useful life (EUL) of LED reflector lamps at seven years. It also compares baseline wattage values for halogen and CFL lamps with efficient LED lamps, noting that for decorative lamps, CFL replacements are not widely available and baseline wattage values are close to efficient LED lamps.
s for Programs, Poster presented at the 2017 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Baltimore, MD. 125 As imposed by US federal legislation. Incandescent Equivalent 2nd Tier EISA 2007. Efficient Product Installation 139 Existi...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of an existing residential energy efficiency program in Nova Scotia, specifically focusing on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) initiative. It references the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2020 and compares halogen and CFL baseline wattages for decorative lamps over different time periods.
33 7 0 E12 40 5 40 35 7 2 Chandelier Finally, LED nightlights and LED holiday lights are not affected by the Canadian or American legislation since they are not defined as general-service lamps (they generate less than 310 lumens). For LED...
AI summary The text discusses the exclusion of LED nightlights and holiday lights from certain energy efficiency legislation due to their lumens output. It also provides data on energy savings from EPI installations in 2017, including gross energy and peak demand savings, and explains the line loss factor used in calculations.
er EISA 2007. 127 An equipment life of 129 years was established based on an average rated lifetime hours of 30,000 hours for holiday lights installed under EPI and annual hours of use of 232 hours. Efficient Product Installation 140 Exist...
AI summary The text references the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2007 and discusses the equipment life calculation for holiday lights installed under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, based on an average rated lifetime and annual usage hours.
Table 77: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Single-family Homes LED Lamps Category of Product 9W 9W 9W 9.5W 9.5W 9.5W Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing 40W 60W 100W 40W 60W 1...
AI summary The table presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI single-family homes, focusing on LED lamps replacing various wattage bulbs. It includes metrics such as total number of units, installation rates, unitary savings value, and total gross energy savings at the meter and generator.
ngs at the meter. Ratios from Navigant are used as is, but ratios for lighting products were adjusted to account for the difference in interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings. Efficient Product Installation 141 Exist...
AI summary The document discusses the adjustment of efficiency ratios for lighting products in the context of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, specifically for single-family homes under the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
ised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Single-family Homes (Continued) LED Lamps
AI summary The text discusses LED lamp energy and peak demand savings for single-family homes under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, continuing from a prior section.
Category of Product 11W 18W 18W 7W GU10 7W GU10 5W Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing 7W G25 Chandelier 60W 75W 100W 35W 50W E12 Energy Savings Total Number of Units 12 191 1,596 1,806 11,410 4,041 28,298 Installation Rate (...
AI summary The text presents a detailed breakdown of energy savings data for various lighting products, including installation rates, energy savings values, and lifetime energy savings. It includes metrics such as energy savings in kWh, gross energy savings at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings. The data spans multiple product categories and highlights the impact of energy-efficient lighting solutions.
0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.000 0.001 0.013 0.005 0.046 0.012 0.092 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the 0.000 0.001 0.014 0.0...
AI summary The text presents data on peak demand savings and energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program for single-family homes in Nova Scotia. It includes metrics like total gross peak demand savings and details on product categories such as LED lights and low-flow showerheads.
Energy Savings Total Number of Units 661 8,533 7,317 883 1,225 2,438 Installation Rate (%) 100% 97% 93% 89% 89% 89% Total Number of Units Installed 661 8,277 6,805 786 1,090 2,170 Unitary Savings Value (kWh) 43.6 28.5 98 236 354 472 Intera...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings from various programs, including the number of units installed, installation rates, energy savings values, and peak demand savings. It includes metrics such as unitary savings value, interactive effects factor, and gross lifetime energy savings.
1.333 0.117 0.162 0.162 0.162 0.162 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.035 0.023 0.108 0.030 0.063 0.166 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings at the Generator (MW) 0.039 0....
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, specifically the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, and includes data on peak demand savings and line loss factors. It notes that savings from LED holiday lights were categorized under 'Single-family Homes' due to a lack of building type information.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Single-family Homes (Continued) Hot Water Smart Power Total for Single- Category of Product Pipe Insulation Tank Wrap Controllers Family Homes Energy Savings Total Nu...
AI summary The document provides revised data on gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI single-family homes, including details on installation rates, energy savings, and lifetime energy savings for various products such as pipe insulation, hot water tank wrap, and smart power controllers.
0.162 0.162 0.000 - Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.044 0.077 0.000 1.906 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 - Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.049 0.084 0.000 2.094 Efficient Product Installa...
AI summary This section presents data on total gross peak demand savings and energy efficiency metrics, specifically focusing on LED lamps within the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) Apartments program under the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Table 78: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Apartments LED Lamps
AI summary The text presents a table titled 'Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Apartments,' focusing on LED lamps as a product category. It highlights energy and peak demand savings associated with the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in apartments.
Category of Product 9W 9W 9W 9.5W 9.5W 9.5W Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing 40W 60W 100W 40W 60W 100W Energy Savings Total Number of Units 397 23,390 1,052 68 438 4 Installation Rate (%) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%...
AI summary The text presents a detailed table of energy savings and peak demand reductions for various lighting products, including metrics like energy savings, installation rates, and lifetime energy savings. It reflects data on efficiency improvements and their impact across different wattage categories.
0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.001 0.115 0.009 0.000 0.002 0.001 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.001...
AI summary The text presents data on peak demand savings and line loss factors, and references the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on Efficient Product Installation (EPI) apartments and LED lamps.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Apartments (Continued) LED Lamps
AI summary The text presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI Apartments, focusing specifically on LED lamps. It provides data on the energy efficiency improvements associated with the installation of LED lighting in apartment settings.
Category of Product 11W 18W 18W 7W GU10 7W GU10 5W Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing 7W G25 Chandelier 60W 75W 100W 35W 50W E12 Energy Savings Total Number of Units 0 6 52 90 1,060 340 1,503 Installation Rate (%) 98% 98% 98...
AI summary The text presents a table of energy savings data for various lighting products, including energy savings, installation rates, and lifetime energy savings. The table includes metrics such as unitary savings value, interactive effects factor, and gross lifetime energy savings at the generator level.
0.120 0.120 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.001 0.005 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator...
AI summary The document presents data on energy and peak demand savings from various efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in apartments. It includes metrics such as gross energy savings and peak demand reductions for different product categories like LED lights, nightlights, faucet aerators, and low-flow showerheads.
Energy Savings Total Number of Units 0 1,142 1,208 70 176 410 Installation Rate (%) 100% 97% 93% 89% 89% 89% Total Number of Units Installed 0 1,108 1,123 62 157 365 Unitary Savings Value (kWh) 43.6 28.5 95 207 310 413 Interactive Effects...
AI summary The document presents energy savings data, including total units installed, energy savings at the meter and generator, peak demand savings, and effective useful life of installations across multiple years. Metrics such as unitary savings value, line loss factor, and demand-to-energy ratio are provided for analysis.
1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings at the Generator (MW) 0.000 0.003 0.019 0.002 0.009 0.027 Efficient Product Installation 147 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report
AI summary The document presents data on total gross peak demand savings and references an evaluation report on the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the 2017 DSM (Demand Side Management) Evaluation Report.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Apartments (Continued) Hot Water Smart Power Category of Product Pipe Insulation Total for Apartments Tank Wrap Controllers Energy Savings Total Number of Units 1,543...
AI summary The document provides revised data on gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI apartments, including metrics such as energy savings, installation rates, and lifetime energy savings. It details the performance of various energy efficiency measures like pipe insulation, hot water tank wraps, and smart power controllers.
y Ratio 0.162 0.162 0.000 - Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.003 0.006 0.000 0.202 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 - Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.003 0.007 0.000 0.222 Efficient Product...
AI summary This section discusses the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) in the context of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It explains how NTGR accounts for free-ridership and internal spillover effects, with free-ridership being assessed through a self-report approach in a telephone survey of non-low-income participants.
avings and using the following equation: Net Savings = Gross Savings × NTGR This equation was used to calculate both peak demand savings and energy savings. Efficient Product Installation 151 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Sc...
AI summary The document calculates net energy and peak demand savings from the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, estimating 17.877 GWh in energy savings and 2.129 MW in peak demand savings. It also estimates annual CO2 emissions avoided due to these savings and provides the methodology used, including the application of Nova Scotia’s specific GHG emissions factor.
7). Emera Inc., Management’s Discussion & Analysis As at February 10, 2017, http://investors.emera.com/Cache/1500095769.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&fid=1500095769&T=&iid=4072693 (Last accessed December 17, 2017) Efficient Product Installation 152 Exis...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, focusing on evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product category, specifically LED lamps.
0.87 0.87 Total Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Meter (MW) 0.016 0.985 0.029 0.004 0.107 0.006 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.018 1.083 0.032 0.004 0.117 0.007...
AI summary The document presents data on total net peak demand savings and line loss factors, and evaluates energy and peak demand savings by product category, specifically LED lamps, under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI (Continued) LED Lamps
AI summary The text continues evaluating the net energy and peak demand savings by product category, specifically focusing on LED lamps under the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program.
Category of Product 11W 18W 18W 7W GU10 7W GU10 5W Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing Replacing 7W G25 Chandelier 60W 75W 100W 35W 50W E12 Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.000 0.009 0.108 0.042 0.426 0....
AI summary The text presents a table of energy savings and peak demand savings for various lighting products, including metrics such as total gross and net energy savings, NTGR, line loss factor, effective useful life, and net lifetime energy savings. It also includes peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI (Continued) Low-flow Showerheads LED Holiday LED Faucet Category of Product 0.5 gpm 0.75 gpm 1.0 gpm Lights Nightlights Aerators Reduction Reduction Reduction Energy...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, focusing on low-flow showerheads, LED holiday lights, LED nightlights, and faucet aerators. It includes metrics such as gross and net energy savings, line loss factors, and net lifetime energy savings.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI (Continued) Hot Water Smart Power Total for All Category of Product Pipe Insulation Tank Wrap Controllers Products Energy Savings Total Gross Energy Savings – at the...
AI summary The document presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including metrics such as gross and net energy savings, line loss factors, and net lifetime energy savings at the generator level.
Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 - Total Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.054 0.095 0.000 2.129 Efficient Product Installation 156 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 83 compar...
AI summary The text presents a comparison of energy and peak demand savings from the 2017 tracking report and the evaluation report, focusing on the Efficient Product Installation program under the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
and savings. This difference was mainly associated with the lower evaluated peak demand-to-energy ratios used for lighting products based on the findings of the Residential Lighting Metering Study. Efficient Product Installation 157 Existi...
AI summary The text discusses overall savings for the Existing Residential program, including participation levels, gross savings, and net savings, based on the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
the whole program. Table 84: Overall Savings for Existing Residential Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings HEA Energy Savings 8.306 GWh 0.76 7.007 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 931 participants 166.116 GWh 0.76 140.139 GWh Peak...
AI summary The document presents a table summarizing the energy and peak demand savings from various residential efficiency programs, including HEA, Green Heat, and EPI, along with their net-to-gross ratios (NTGR) and net savings. The data highlights the overall savings from the Existing Residential Program in Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report CONCLUSION The Existing Residential program is comprised of two well-established program components (HEA and Green Heat) and a new component (EPI, which has resulted from the merger of RDI...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that the Existing Residential program achieved its peak demand savings target but fell short of its energy savings goal. EPI was the main contributor to energy savings, while Green Heat contributed most to peak demand savings. HEA exceeded both its energy and peak demand savings targets in 2017.
tor and thus exceeding the planned energy and peak demand savings and 2016 results. A total of 931 participants completed projects through HEA in 2017, an increase compared to 2016 (893 participants). Satisfaction with HEA was generally hi...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program saw increased participation in 2017, with high satisfaction among participants and Energy Advisors (EAs). Participants appreciated the service and expertise, while some expressed concerns about low rebates and unclear requirements. EAs praised the program’s integration with NRCan guidelines and its environmental benefits but noted that rebate calculations were complex and poorly explained.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Green Heat Green Heat achieved 2.980 GWh in net energy savings and 3.073 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017, meeting its planned peak demand savings (1.7 MW) but not its planned energy s...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that Green Heat achieved 2.980 GWh in net energy savings and 3.073 MW in net peak demand savings, meeting its peak demand target but falling short of its energy savings goal. Increased participation, driven by the introduction of MSHPs and policy changes, contributed to higher engagement, though energy savings were lower than expected due to revised savings values from billing analyses.
P market has undergone many changes over the last few years. Heat pumps are becoming a more popular option as a primary heating system, and the number of MSHPs incentivized by ENS keeps increasing. Existing Residential Program 160 Existing...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program achieved 17.877 GWh in net energy savings and 2.129 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017, falling short of its planned savings. Participation was lower than expected, but the program has contributed significantly to the growth of energy-efficient lighting product penetration in Nova Scotia since 2012.
information they provided to participants), the time required to complete the work, and the energy-efficient products installed were all cited as reasons for this high level of satisfaction with EPI. Again this year, LED lamps accounted fo...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights high participant satisfaction with the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, citing factors such as information provided, time required for installations, and energy-efficient products used. LED lamps contributed the majority of energy and peak demand savings, with a decrease in A-type lamp replacements attributed to the shift away from incandescent lighting. The report suggests further analysis of other replacement technologies like CFL and halogen incandescent lamps to improve savings calculations.
Program – Appendices. Home Energy Assessment Appendix I - HEA: 2017 Recommendations Appendix II - HEA: Interview Guide with the Energy Advisors Appendix III - HEA: Participant Survey Questionnaire Appendix IV - HEA: Participant Survey Resu...
AI summary The text outlines appendices related to various energy efficiency programs, including Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation, with details on surveys, methodologies, and evaluation reports from 2017.
HEA: 2017 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2017 evaluation. There were no incomplete 2016 recommendations at the time of writing. Section Recommendations 1. Review the cu...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program recommends simplifying the incentive structure and conducting a billing analysis to address overestimation of savings due to the use of a new version of the HOT2000 software.
RVIEW GUIDE WITH THE ENERGY ADVISORS PROGRAM NAME: HOME ENERGY ASSESSMENT Interview date and time Company name Interviewee name Area code and phone number Email Introduction Thank you for taking the time to speak with me. Today, I am inter...
AI summary This document is a review guide for evaluating Efficiency Nova Scotia's Home Energy Assessment program. It outlines an interview process with program partners to gather insights on their involvement and satisfaction with the program. The evaluation is being conducted by Econoler in partnership with Corporate Research Associates.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Score Reason 1=not at all satisfied Please share the reason(s) Aspects of the program 10=completely satisfied for your score (regardless NA=Not applicable of the score). DK=Don’t...
AI summary The document is an appendix from the 2017 DSM Evaluation by Efficiency Nova Scotia, containing survey questions about program satisfaction, challenges in delivery, and feedback on the Home Energy Assessment program. It includes sections for participants to rate their experience and provide qualitative feedback.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report A6. I will read a list of topics that could be the focus of training sessions. Using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 means ‘’not at all useful’’ and 10 means ‘’extremely useful’’,...
AI summary The text discusses training topics and delivery methods for the Home Energy Assessment Program, as well as outreach strategies to increase participation. It includes questions about the usefulness of training on program guidelines, technologies, and software, as well as preferences for training formats.
number of homes that register for a pre-retrofit assessment (in terms of marketing, outreach activities, technical support, etc.)? Is there anything that service organizations could do? B2. What prevents homeowners from going through the p...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions aimed at evaluating the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on barriers to participation, implementation of recommended upgrades, and improvements to the Home Energy Assessment program. It also seeks insights into recent trends in energy efficiency in Nova Scotia's residential market.
our opinion, what explains these changes or trends? [Probe whether the Home Energy Assessment program has had an influence: rebates/financing, ENS advertising and communications, etc.] C2a. More specifically, what changes have you observed...
AI summary The text outlines questions posed to assess the impact of ENS' Home Energy Assessment Program on customer choices regarding building envelope measures and heating systems over the past five years. It also explores differences in efficiency between new and existing homes and potential measures to increase market adoption of energy-efficient products.
Explanation: C5. What additional measures or equipment should ENS incent or support as part of the Home Energy Assessment Program or another program to increase market adoption? Why? Explanation: C6. Will it become easier or more difficult...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions from a regulatory proceeding regarding the Home Energy Assessment Program, focusing on measures to increase market adoption, challenges in promoting high-efficiency products, and broader trends in the residential market. It also includes a survey questionnaire for participants in the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Verification and Recall (Series V) V1. We understand you participated in the Home Energy Assessment program. Is that correct? 1 Yes [CONTINUE] 2 No, does not recall participating...
AI summary This document is part of an evaluation of Nova Scotia's 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program. It includes a verification process for participants in the Home Energy Assessment program, asking whether they recall participating and providing prompts to help them remember.
NATE AND RECORD.] [IF REFUSED, ASK “Can we schedule a more convenient time for you to conduct this survey?”] [SCHEDULED, IF NECESSARY, FOR: _] Participation [P Series] P1. Now I’m going to ask you to think back to when you decided to sched...
AI summary This section of the document outlines a survey conducted to assess customer participation and satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It asks participants about their primary motivation for joining the program and their overall satisfaction level.
is “not at all satisfied” and 10 is “completely satisfied” how would you rate your satisfaction with the program overall? [RECORD NUMBER, 98=Don’t know, 99 Refused] DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE S2. [IF S1<8] What was the most important reason you...
AI summary The text outlines a survey asking participants to rate their satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment Program on a scale from 1 to 10, and to identify the most important reason for dissatisfaction if applicable. It also asks participants to rate specific aspects of the program, including the energy assessment, reports, customer service, and rebate or financing options.
energy advisor f) [IF REBATE IN THE DATABASE] The rebate amount g) [IF FINANCING IN THE DATABASE] The financing option h) Length of time allowed to complete your upgrades S4. In addition to the Energy Efficiency Evaluation Report telling y...
AI summary The text outlines a process for home energy upgrades, including rebate amounts, financing options, and the Energy Action Plan report provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report related to residential energy efficiency programs.
sealing or draft proofing i. Heat pump water heater or solar water heating system j. Wood or pellet stove or furnace [ASK VR2A-B IF ANY ITEM IN VR1A THRU J=1 (“YES, RECOMMENDED”)] VR2a. IF MORE THAN ONE ITEM IN VR1a-j=YES, READ: Through th...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the implementation of energy efficiency upgrades through the Home Energy Assessment program, including heat pump water heaters, solar water heating systems, and wood or pellet stoves. It asks respondents whether they implemented at least one or all of the recommended upgrades and which specific recommendations they followed.
=1 (“YES, IMPLEMENTED AT LEAST ONE UPGRADE”) VR3. Which of the following recommendations have you implemented under the Home Energy Assessment program? [ASK FOR EACH ITEM IN VR1a thru j = 1] [1 = YES, IMPLEMENTED, 2 = NO, NOT IMPLEMENTED,...
AI summary The text asks respondents to indicate whether they have implemented specific energy efficiency upgrades under the Home Energy Assessment program, including insulation, heat pumps, and ventilation systems, as part of an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM program.
SES IN VR3a-j, OR IF ‘YES’ IN VR2b, OR VR2A=02 (ALL Now I’m going to ask you to think of all the energy-efficient upgrades that were implemented to your home under the Home Energy Assessment program. FR1. BEFORE having your home evaluated...
AI summary The text discusses a survey related to the Home Energy Assessment program, asking participants about their plans to implement energy-efficient upgrades before an energy advisor's evaluation and whether they would have paid for these upgrades without a rebate. It is part of an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report b. [IF FINANCING IN DATABASE] Efficiency Nova Scotia provided you with a $[ACTUAL LOAN AMOUNT] loan for the energy efficiency upgrades you implemented in your home. If you had no...
AI summary This section of the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report asks participants about their financing decisions for energy efficiency upgrades and how they would have acted without the Home Energy Assessment program. It seeks to evaluate the impact of the program on customer behavior.
tandard equipment, material or product instead of energy-efficient equipment, material or product in your home? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused FR3c. [ASK IF FR2 a or b >=5] If the program, rebate or financing had not been offered, w...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer perceptions of energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the influence of rebates, financing, and expert advice on their decision to implement energy efficiency upgrades in their homes.
efused c. Expert information or advice from the energy _ Response _98 Don’t Know advisor who came to your home to conduct the energy assessment _99 Refused Cross-Influence (CI Series) READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUE...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, particularly the Home Energy Assessment program. It explores whether prior participation in other programs influenced decisions to implement energy efficiency upgrades and consider energy savings on bills.
you took into account the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different upgrades for your home in [DATE]. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) CI3. Before participating in the Home Energy Assessment program in [DATE]...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer participation in the Home Energy Assessment program and the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on their decisions to implement energy efficiency upgrades. The questions focus on whether promotional materials were a major factor in decision-making and energy bill savings considerations.
the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different upgrades for your home in [DATE]. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Spillover (SO Series) [ASK SO SECTION IF VR2a = 1 OR 3, OR IF VR2b = 2, OR IF ANY OF VR3 = ‘2’....
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to customer participation in the Home Energy Assessment program and subsequent implementation of recommended energy upgrades. It includes conditional logic for follow-up questions based on responses and references a 2017 DSM Evaluation report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report [IF SO1=1] SO3. Have you received financing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for the energy efficiency upgrades you implemented on your own after participati...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's Home Energy Assessment program on participants' decisions to implement energy efficiency upgrades. It also references recommendations for program improvements.
on to implement additional energy efficiency upgrades.” [RECORD RESPONSE 0-10, 98 = Don’t know, 99 = REFUSED] [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE] Recommendations for Program Improvements [R Series] R1. Do you have any recommendations for improving the...
AI summary The document includes recommendations for improving the Home Energy Assessment program, such as offering more eligible products, increasing rebates, and improving program advertising. It also outlines demographic questions for statistical purposes, emphasizing confidentiality.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report HEA: PARTICIPANT SURVEY RESULTS The participant survey results are presented in the following tables. P1. Now I’m going to ask you to think back to when you decided to schedule an energy efficiency ass...
AI summary The text presents participant survey results from the 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on the Home Energy Assessment program and the reasons participants decided to schedule an energy efficiency assessment.
terested in having your home evaluated by an energy advisor? P2. Were there any other reasons? 2015 2016 2017 Reasons for Participating Most Second Most Most Second Most Most Second Most Important Important Important Important Important Im...
AI summary The text presents survey data on reasons for participating in energy efficiency programs between 2015 and 2017. The most common motivation was saving on energy costs, followed by receiving expert advice and planning for energy-efficient upgrades. Rebates and financing also played a significant role in participation.
- 32% - 37% - 41% Don’t know/Refused - 1% - 1% - 6% Multiple responses Project No. 6138 21 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report S1. Using a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 is ‘not at all sati...
AI summary The document presents survey results from the 2017 evaluation of the Existing Residential Program, specifically the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) under Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes customer satisfaction ratings and reasons for dissatisfaction with the program.
hat was the most important reason you were not more satisfied with the program overall? Key Reasons Not More Satisfied with HEA 2016 2017 Sample Size 27 12 (#) The rebate received was too small 30% 5 Program requirements/Eligibility criter...
AI summary Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, citing reasons such as the rebate being too small, unclear program requirements, and the scope of the program being too narrow. Other issues included difficulties in scheduling appointments and not receiving expected EnerGuide ratings.
2 None/No reasons - 1 Base: Respondents who were not satisfied with HEA (NOT SATISFIED: S1<8) Project No. 6138 22 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report S3. On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1=...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question regarding customer satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment program, specifically asking respondents to rate their satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 10.
S3. On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1=‘not at all satisfied’ and 10=‘completely satisfied’, how satisfied were you with each of the following aspects of the Home Energy Assessment program?
AI summary The text asks respondents to rate their satisfaction with the Home Energy Assessment program on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 indicates 'not at all satisfied' and 10 indicates 'completely satisfied'.
2015 2016 2017 Satisfaction with Aspects of HEA Sample Sample Sample Mean Mean Mean Size Size Size The customer service provided by the - - 104 9.0 70 9.3 energy advisor The initial energy assessment overall 100 8.9 103 8.8 70 9.3 The expe...
AI summary The text presents survey results from 2015 to 2017 regarding customer satisfaction with various aspects of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, including service provided by energy advisors, the energy assessment process, and the Energy Efficiency Evaluation Report. Satisfaction scores are reported with sample sizes and mean ratings.
9% Don’t know 3% Base: Respondents who read report VR2a/VR2b. Through the Home Energy Assessment program, have you implemented at least one, all or none of the energy efficiency recommendations, meaning that you received a rebate or financ...
AI summary The text presents survey results from the Home Energy Assessment program, showing the percentage of respondents who implemented energy efficiency upgrades between 2015 and 2017. It also references an evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia's residential program as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report VR1. I am going to read you a list of upgrades that may have been recommended by the energy advisor for your home. For each one, can you please tell me if that upgrade was recomm...
AI summary This section of the document presents two questions related to the Home Energy Assessment program, asking participants about recommended home upgrades and which recommendations they have implemented.
can you please tell me if that upgrade was recommended for your home? VR3. Which of the following recommendations have you implemented under the Home Energy Assessment program?
AI summary The text asks whether a home upgrade was recommended and inquires about implemented recommendations under the Home Energy Assessment program.
2015 2016 2017 Recommended Measures Recom- Imple- Recom- Imple- Recom- Imple- mended mented mended mented mended mented Sample Size 100 100 104 104 70 70 Building insulation including ceiling, exterior wall, exposed floor, basement, - - 85...
AI summary The table presents the implementation rates of various energy efficiency measures across three years (2015, 2016, and 2017), including building insulation, heat pumps, air sealing, and other efficiency initiatives. The data shows varying levels of implementation, with some measures showing improvement over time and others declining.
- Ground source geothermal heat pump 7% 2% 4% - 6% - Slight wording change from 2015 Slight wording change from 2016 Project No. 6138 26 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report VR1/V3. Meas...
AI summary The document discusses the Existing Residential Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on measure uptake calculated as the percentage of measures implemented compared to those recommended. It includes a project number and notes slight wording changes from previous years.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report VR1/V3. Measure uptake calculated as the percentage of measures implemented by measures recommended. 2015 2016 2017 Recommended Energy Efficiency Measure Uptake Measure Measure Measure Uptake Uptake Up...
AI summary This appendix report evaluates the uptake of energy efficiency measures from 2015 to 2017. It shows varying levels of implementation, with some measures like windows and doors achieving high uptake, while others such as heat pump water heaters and geothermal systems had lower uptake rates.
- Ground source geothermal heat pump 25% - - Slight wording change from 2015 Slight wording change from 2016 Project No. 6138 27 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report VR4a. On a scale of...
AI summary The document presents a section from an evaluation of the 2017 DSM program, specifically focusing on the Existing Residential Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes a survey question asking participants to rate the importance of factors in deciding on household upgrades through the Home Energy Assessment program.
important’ and 10 is ‘extremely important’, how important, if at all, were the following when deciding what upgrade(s) to make to your household through the Home Energy Assessment program? 2016 2017 Importance of Factors on Choice of Upgra...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the importance of various factors in deciding household upgrades through the Home Energy Assessment program in 2016 and 2017. It highlights the significance of reducing energy costs, improving efficiency, comfort, and home value, as well as the consideration of cost-effective options.
Refused excluded from calculations VR4b. What other considerations, if any, were important in your decision to make upgrades to your household based on the Energy Efficiency Evaluation Report? Other Considerations 2016 2017 Sample Size 100...
AI summary The text presents survey results on considerations for home energy efficiency upgrades based on an Energy Efficiency Evaluation Report. Key factors include energy savings, cost, comfort, and rebates, with a majority of respondents indicating they had no specific considerations.
2017 Heat Pump, Water Reasons for Not Air Source Central Heat Pump Building Insulation Heater, Solar Making the Heat Pump Water Heating Upgrade Most Most Most Most Other Other Other Other Important Important Important Important Reasons Rea...
AI summary The text presents data on reasons why residents in Nova Scotia are not making energy-efficient upgrades, such as heat pumps, building insulation, and water heating systems. The primary reasons cited include affordability, lack of conviction about cost-effectiveness, and inconvenience.
2017 Ground Drain Water Air Wood or Windows, Source Heat Sealing, Pellet Ventilation Reasons for Not Door, Geothermal Recovery Draft Stove or System Making the Upgrade Skylights Heat Pump System Proofing Furnace Most Most Most Most Most Mo...
AI summary The text presents data on reasons why individuals in Nova Scotia are not making energy-efficient upgrades, with affordability and perceived value being key factors. The data is categorized by different types of heating and ventilation systems.
- 2 1 5 - efficient upgrade was worth the money Inconvenient or difficult to make the upgrade in - - - - - my home Rebate wasn’t - - - - - high enough Not needed/Didn’t - - 5 - 2 need to be upgraded Lack of interest 1 2 - - - 2 Couldn’t fi...
AI summary The text discusses customer responses to energy efficiency upgrades, highlighting reasons for not making recommended upgrades, such as rebate amounts not being high enough, inconvenience, and lack of interest. It also asks respondents about a more reasonable rebate amount, with a preferred amount of $400 mentioned.
r home evaluated by an energy advisor, did you have plans to implement the specific energy-efficient upgrades that were implemented through the program? Did you … I just want to make sure I understand - Before you had your home evaluated b...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question about whether homeowners had already decided to implement energy-efficient upgrades before an energy advisor evaluated their homes, with data showing varying percentages across different years.
95 7.9 62 7.0 Base: Respondents who implemented at least one of the eligible measures Don’t know/Refused excluded from calculations FR3. Now I would like to ask you to consider what actions you would have taken if the Home Energy Assessmen...
AI summary This section presents survey data on customer behavior related to the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. Respondents were asked about the likelihood of taking specific actions if the program had not been available, such as implementing the same number of upgrades or postponing energy efficiency improvements.
om 0 to 10 where 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the influence of each of the following in your decision to implement the energy efficiency upgrades. 2016 2017 Influence of HEA in Decisions Sample Size Me...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the influence of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program on participants' decisions to implement energy efficiency upgrades in 2016 and 2017. It also includes data on previous participation in other Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs.
15 4 - implement energy efficiency upgrades in (#) your home Base: Respondents who previously participated in another ENS program CI3. Before participating in the Home Energy Assessment program in [DATE], had you at any time in the past al...
AI summary The text discusses a survey related to the Home Energy Assessment program and Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on participants' prior exposure to promotional materials for energy efficiency. It includes data from 2016 and 2017 and references a project number and an evaluation report.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report CI4. For the following statements, please indicate whether you agree or disagree. 2016 2017 Impact of Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials Sample Don’t Sample Don’t Agree Disagre...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Appendix Report includes survey data on the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on customer behavior, including responses about whether they prompted customers to consider energy savings, request home energy assessments, or implement energy efficiency upgrades. It also asks about follow-up actions on recommended upgrades.
he Home Energy Assessment program. Since the time that you participated in the Home Energy Assessment program, have you implemented one or more of the recommended upgrades on your own? Implemented Upgrades After Participation 2015 2016 201...
AI summary The text discusses the Home Energy Assessment program, asking participants if they implemented recommended upgrades after participation. It includes statistics from 2015 to 2017 showing that only 22-28% of respondents implemented upgrades, with the rest not doing so.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report SO2. Which upgrades have you implemented on your own after participating in the Home Energy Assessment program?
AI summary The document asks participants of the Home Energy Assessment program about the upgrades they have implemented on their own after participating in the program.
Other Upgrades Implemented After Participating 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 21 12 8 (%) (#) (#) Air sealing or draft proofing 24% 2 3 Building insulation including ceiling, exterior wall, exposed floor, - 6 2 basement, crawlspace, or foundat...
AI summary The text provides a breakdown of energy efficiency upgrades implemented by participants between 2015 and 2017, including air sealing, insulation, heat recovery ventilation systems, and other measures. The data includes sample sizes and the number of upgrades implemented each year.
Electric water heater tank or pipe insulation - 1 - Wood or pellet furnace or boiler - 1 - Basement insulation 14% - - Crawlspace insulation 10% - - Ceiling insulation 5% - - High efficiency air to air (or air source) heat pump with electr...
AI summary The text presents a survey question regarding whether respondents received financing or rebates from Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for energy efficiency upgrades implemented after participating in the Home Energy Assessment program.
ancing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for the energy efficiency upgrades you implemented on your own after participating in the Home Energy Assessment program? Received Financing or Rebates for Upgrades Implemented 2...
AI summary The text asks participants if they received financing or rebates from Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for energy efficiency upgrades they implemented after participating in the Home Energy Assessment program. It also asks about the influence of the program on their decision to implement additional upgrades.
to implement additional energy efficiency upgrades” and 10 indicates that the program was “extremely influential in your decision to implement additional energy efficiency upgrades.” Importance of HEA in 2015 2016 2017 Influencing Decision...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of Home Energy Assessments (HEA) on residents' decisions to implement additional energy efficiency upgrades, citing survey data from 2015 to 2017. It also references a request for recommendations to improve the Home Energy Assessment program as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report R1. Do you have any recommendations for improving the Home Energy Assessment program? Anything else?
AI summary The document presents a question regarding recommendations for improving the Home Energy Assessment program under the 2017 DSM Evaluation. No specific recommendations or additional comments are provided in the text.
Participant Suggestions for HEA 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 100 104 70 Clarify the incentive structure or financing options/Make it easier to - - 10% understand how to reach incentives Increase Efficiency Nova Scotia rebates 8% 6% 9% Offer...
AI summary The data presents participant suggestions for improving the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program over the years 2015 to 2017. Key recommendations include clarifying incentive structures, increasing rebates, expanding eligible products, and improving communication and program visibility.
fficiency upgrades that Were IF 1 and FR1=2, FR1a = 25% implemented through HEA? IF 2 OR DK/REF: FR1a = 0% 1. Yes 2. No PA2 Score: FR1a FR4. Level of influence of three program factors (Scale 0 to 10) FR4 = MAX(a ; b ; c) PA3 Score: (10 –...
AI summary The text includes a questionnaire about the implementation of energy efficiency upgrades through Home Energy Assessments (HEA) and evaluates the influence of program factors on customer behavior. It references the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report and relates to Efficiency Nova Scotia's residential program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report HEA: INTERNAL SPILLOVER METHODOLOGY Internal spillover was measured using a participant survey. Participants were asked whether following their participation in HEA, they impleme...
AI summary The report details the methodology used to measure internal spillover from the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. It involved surveying participants to determine if they implemented additional energy efficiency measures beyond those incentivized by the program, and quantifying the influence of the program on these actions.
believes that the ASHP billing analysis should be conducted again in 2018 to obtain a larger sample of participants and improve the accuracy of savings. 2. Conduct a survey with a larger sample of participants who installed MSHPs in non-el...
AI summary The document suggests re-evaluating the billing analysis for ASHPs in 2018 with a larger sample size and conducting a survey on MSHPs installed in non-electrically heated households to improve accuracy and assess the impact of Green Heat on participants' decisions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Section Recommendations 3. Improve the collection of technical information about ASHPs. Peak demand savings for ASHPs are based on technical information such as heating capacity...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation report recommends improving the collection of technical information about Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs) to enhance the accuracy of peak demand savings calculations. The report notes that while the average unitary peak demand savings value of 3.04 kW is still used, more accurate data is needed, especially as the number of ASHP installations has increased significantly since 2015.
e Evaluator reiterates the recommendation to start tracking ASHP performance data at -15°C to increase the accuracy of the peak demand savings calculations. 4. Gather additional information to further characterize the MSHP market. While th...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends tracking ASHP performance data at -15°C to improve peak demand savings calculations and suggests gathering more data on the MSHP market. It also advises developing a clear list of eligible ASHP equipment to help participants make informed decisions and avoid rebate issues.
Section Recommendations 2016 6. Increase program component advertising to households and collaborate with Recommendations contractors. Evaluation results showed fairly high free-ridership levels for products (Not fully rebated through Gree...
AI summary The evaluation of the Green Heat program highlights high free-ridership levels for rebated products, particularly heat pumps and MSHPs. The Evaluator recommends increasing advertising to households and collaborating with retailers to improve program awareness and promote higher efficiency models. Retailer training and point-of-sale materials are also suggested to enhance promotion of energy-efficient products.
systems] How has this change in process affected you, if at all? Q11. [If completed projects under old system] How do you anticipate this change in process will affect you, if at all? Q12. [If completed projects through both systems] How h...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding the impact of a process change on customers and program outreach for the Green Heat program, including customer identification methods, outreach strategies, and support from Efficiency Nova Scotia. It focuses on how the change has influenced customer engagement and program promotion.
heat pumps, solar, or biomass systems) than you had prior to participating in the program? [If there has been a change] How has the program, other than the rebate, helped you sell more? Q25. On a scale of zero to ten where, zero is not at...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer satisfaction with the Efficiency Nova Scotia Green Heat program and discusses the qualifications for mini-split heat pumps under the program, including performance standards.
ve a COP ≥ 1.75 at maximum capacity operation for -15°C outdoor temperature, and (3) must have an HSPF for region 5 of more than 9.6 for single-zone systems or of more than 8.7 for multi-zone systems. Q28. Approximately how many mini-split...
AI summary The text includes questions about the sales of mini-split heat pumps, specifically focusing on the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's rebate program on sales volume and qualification rates. It also references energy efficiency standards and program evaluation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Q33. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means ‘it did not increase at all” and “10” means “it increased a great deal” how much do you think the Green Heat program has increased each...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the impact of the Green Heat program on the availability and promotion of high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps, as well as the effectiveness of the program in influencing customer choices. It also asks about the reasons customers choose standard efficiency models and the program's successes, challenges, and opportunities.
cy models, why do they opt not to go with the energy-efficient models? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities Q36. How, if at all, has the Green Heat program been a success for your firm? Q37. How, if at all, has the Green Heat program b...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of the Green Heat program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including participant survey questions and the purpose of the program, which offers rebates or financing for energy efficiency improvements such as solar systems and heating equipment.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Participation [P Series] P1. First I’m going to ask you to think back to when you decided to install a [EQUIPMENT]. What was the SINGLE most important reason you were interested...
AI summary The document is an appendix from the 2017 DSM Evaluation by Efficiency Nova Scotia, containing survey questions related to participation in energy efficiency programs and usage of high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps. It includes questions about motivations for installation and additional heating systems in homes.
ed high-efficiency mini-split heat pump, is there another heating system used for heating in your home? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) U2. [IF U1=1] What type of heating system is it? Is it… [READ IN ORDER AND ACCEPT ONE RESPO...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about heating systems in homes, specifically focusing on the installation of high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps and the reasons for choosing them over other heating systems. It also references a free-ridership analysis related to mini-split heat pumps.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Series A: Questions on the decision to install a heat pump FRM1. Had you already decided to install a heat pump before you heard about the Green Heat Program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (D...
AI summary This document is part of an evaluation of the 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program, focusing on customer decisions regarding heat pump installations. It includes survey questions about whether customers had already decided to install a heat pump before learning about the Green Heat Program and how they would have acted without the program's rebate or financing.
rogram, had you already made the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump model? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) FRM5a. [IF REBATE] Efficiency Nova Scotia gave a rebate of $[INCENTIVE] for your new high- efficiency heat...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer behavior regarding the installation of high-efficiency heat pumps and the impact of rebates and financing provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also references a project number and an evaluation report related to a residential energy efficiency program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FRM6. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your decision to install high-efficiency heat pump. Using a scale from 0 to 10, wher...
AI summary The document discusses a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia to evaluate the 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program, focusing on factors influencing the installation of high-efficiency heat pumps, including program rebates, information provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia and retailers, and free-ridership related to heat pumps.
ou had already made the decision to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT]? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) FRH2a. [IF REBATE] Efficiency Nova Scotia gave a rebate of $[INCENTIVE] for your new [EQUIPMENT]. If you had not receive...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to customer participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's residential energy efficiency programs, specifically regarding rebate and financing options for high-efficiency equipment. It asks respondents whether they would have paid for or financed the equipment without the program's support.
Green Heat Program, you had already made the decision to install a [EQUIPMENT]? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) FRS2a. [IF REBATE] Efficiency Nova Scotia gave a rebate of $[INCENTIVE] for your new [EQUIPMENT]. If you had not re...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to the Green Heat Program, asking participants about their equipment installation decisions, rebate and financing impacts, and alternative actions if the program was unavailable. The focus is on understanding customer behavior and the influence of incentives.
ale from 0 to 10, where 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the influence of each of the following in your decision to install a [EQUIPMENT]. Factor Responses – DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE (READ AND RANDOMIZE) a. T...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the influence of program rebates, information from Efficiency Nova Scotia, and cross-influence factors in the decision to install equipment. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation and a project number.
eport e. The disruption of equipment installation in your home f. The overall purchase and installation cost of the equipment compared to other heating options S4. What other concerns, if any, did you have with installing [a/an] [EQUIPMENT...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to customer concerns about installing equipment under the Green Heat program, including concerns about cost, energy savings, and financing. It also asks about price thresholds for considering equipment too expensive or too cheap.
nsidered the cost of [EQUIPMENT TYPE] to be priced so low that you would have felt the product quality couldn’t be very good? a. Record response (Force numeric) b. DK Project No. 6138 67 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to customer perceptions of equipment cost and awareness of mini-split heat pumps. It is part of an evaluation of an existing residential energy efficiency program in Nova Scotia.
viding a better heating system than previous system) 6 (More environmentally friendly) 96 (Other [SPECIFY _]) 98 (Don’t know) 99 (Refused) R2. Other than increase the rebate or loan amount, how could Efficiency Nova Scotia improve the Gree...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer feedback on the Green Heat program and demographic information collection. It asks about preferences for heating systems, suggestions for program improvements, and residence types. The information is collected for statistical purposes and is strictly confidential.
Total 2016 Total 2017 Second Second Reasons for Participating Most Most Most Most Important Important Important Important Reason Reason Reason Reason Sample Size 90 90 91 91 Save on energy/energy costs 54% 11% 49% 16% Old system wasn’t wor...
AI summary The text presents survey results from 2016 and 2017 regarding reasons customers participated in a program. Key reasons include saving on energy costs, improving home efficiency, and better comfort, with notable differences in percentages between the years.
at 3% 8% 1% 1% To help the environment 3% 4% 1% 2% Wanted wood stove/Like wood heat 1% 9% 1% 2% Rebate/Financing - 2% - 1% Others 4% 9% 2% 5% Nothing/No other reasons - 21% - 32% Don’t know - 1% - 1% Multiple responses Project No. 6138 72...
AI summary The text presents survey data on residential heating systems, including the use of wood stoves, heat pumps, and other systems. It also includes responses to questions about reasons for participation in energy efficiency programs and rebate/financing preferences.
14% Others 12% Base: MSHP respondents Project No. 6138 73 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FRM1. Had you already decided to install a heat pump before you heard about the Green Heat...
AI summary The text presents survey data from the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report, focusing on the Green Heat Program. It shows that 53% of respondents had already decided to install a heat pump before learning about the program, and explores what actions respondents would have taken if the program rebate or financing had not been available.
30% Base: MSHP respondents who were aware of high efficiency heat pumps prior to participating in the program component FRM5a. [IF REBATE] Efficiency Nova Scotia gave a rebate of $[INCENTIVE] for your new high- efficiency heat pump. If you...
AI summary The text presents survey results from participants in the high-efficiency heat pump program, assessing whether they would have paid for or financed the installation of a heat pump without program incentives. The mean response for rebate recipients was 8.8, while for financing recipients it was 5.0.
already made the decision to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT]? Already Made Decision to Install Equipment Prior to Green Heat 2017 Sample Size 24 Yes 71% No 25% Don’t know/Refused 4% Base: ASHP/GSHP Respondents FRH2a. [IF REBATE] Effi...
AI summary This document discusses customer responses to a survey regarding prior decisions to install high-efficiency equipment before the Green Heat program in 2017. It also includes a question about whether customers would have paid for equipment without a rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia.
n available. I will read you a few options. For each one, please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” 2017 Actions Taken in Absence of Green Heat Sample...
AI summary The text presents survey data on actions taken by respondents in the absence of green heat, including postponing equipment installation, choosing less efficient heat pumps, and retaining old heating systems. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation report related to residential energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia.
ale from 0 to 10, where 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the influence of each of the following in your decision to install a [EQUIPMENT]. 2017 Influence of Factors on Decision to Have Equipment Installed...
AI summary The text discusses factors influencing the decision to install equipment, focusing on the influence of information provided by ENS and program rebates or financing. It also asks respondents if they had already decided to install equipment before learning about the Green Heat Program.
n available. I will read you a few options. For each one, please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” 2017 Actions Taken in Absence of Green Heat Sample...
AI summary The text discusses actions taken by respondents in the absence of green heat equipment, such as postponing installation or keeping old systems, along with a request to rate the importance of factors influencing their decision to install equipment.
xcluded from calculations CI1. Before participating in the Green Heat program in [DATE], had you at any time in the past already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program? 2017 2016 Wood/ Previous Participation in Another ENS...
AI summary This section asks participants in the Green Heat program if they had previously participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program, with responses categorized by program components and percentages provided for different years and system types.
revious participation in an ENS program and what you learned by participating in this program, you asked a contractor or a distributor about energy efficient heating systems for your home. 2017 2016 Previous Participation in Another ENS AS...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of previous participation in an ENS program on participants' decisions regarding energy-efficient heating systems, with a focus on how prior experience influenced their consideration of energy bill savings when evaluating different heating options.
ore participating in the Green Heat program in [YEAR], had you at any time in the past already seen Efficiency Nova Scotia promotional materials advertising the benefits of energy efficiency? 2017 Previously Saw Energy Efficiency 2016 ASHP...
AI summary This text discusses a survey conducted on participants in the Green Heat program, focusing on whether they had previously seen promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia and how these materials influenced their decision to install energy-efficient equipment in their homes.
option in the absence of the program component CI4a. The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS were a major factor in your decision to install a [EQUIPMENT] in your home. 2017 Previously Saw Energy Efficiency 2016 ASHP...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS on customers' decisions to install energy-efficient heating systems in their homes. It includes survey data showing that a majority of respondents who saw the materials agreed they influenced their decision.
romotional materials CI4b. The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS prompted you to ask a contractor or a distributor about energy efficient heating systems for your home. 2017 Previously Saw Energy Efficiency 2016 To...
AI summary The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS prompted respondents to inquire about energy-efficient heating systems. The survey shows that 70% of respondents who saw the materials agreed to the information, while 30% disagreed. The materials were effective in prompting interest in systems such as ASHP, GSHP, and solar.
- - - - - Base: Respondents who previously saw ENS energy efficiency promotional materials Project No. 6138 81 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report CI4c. The energy - efficiency promotio...
AI summary The text refers to a survey question asking respondents who previously saw ENS energy efficiency promotional materials if they considered energy bill savings when evaluating heating systems for their homes.
The energy - efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS prompted you to take into account the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different heating systems for your home? 2017 Previously Saw Energy Efficiency 2016 Total AS...
AI summary The text discusses customer feedback on energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS, highlighting the impact on their evaluation of heating systems for their homes. It includes survey results from 2016 and 2017, showing high levels of agreement with the materials' influence on energy bill savings.
Other than increase the rebate or loan amount, how could Efficiency Nova Scotia improve the Green Heat program? 2017
AI summary The question asks how Efficiency Nova Scotia could improve the Green Heat program other than increasing the rebate or loan amount, suggesting a focus on alternative strategies for enhancing the program's effectiveness.
Recommendations to Improve Green Heat ASHP/ Wood/Pellet/ Total MSHP GSHP Solar (%) (%) (%) (#) Sample Size 91 51 24 16 Advertise the program component more or in a 13% 16% 8% 2 better way Offer more information and flexibility on the 12% 1...
AI summary The text presents survey results on recommendations to improve green heat programs, including advertising, eligibility, rebate increases, and simplifying application processes. The data shows varying levels of support for different improvements across different heating technologies.
GH: NEW PATH PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2 No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is from Corporate Research Associates, a...
AI summary This document is a survey questionnaire for participants of the Green Heat Program, aiming to gather feedback on their experience with energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. The survey focuses on participants who installed a mini-split heat pump through the program and includes probing questions for those who may not recall their participation.
Heating stove (wood or pellet) 5. Gas or oil-fired furnace 6. Or something else (SPECIFY: _) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) U4. Which part of your house is heated by the mini-split heat pump installed through the Green Heat program? Is it…...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about heating systems and heat pump installations, focusing on the Green Heat Program. It asks respondents about their current heating methods and whether they had already decided to install a heat pump before learning about the program.
Heat Program, you had already made the decision to install a heat pump? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Project No. 6138 96 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FRM2. [IF FRM...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to a residential energy efficiency program, specifically focusing on customer decisions regarding heat pump installation and the impact of program rebates on purchasing behavior.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FRM5. Efficiency Nova Scotia gave you a rebate of $[INCENTIVE] for your new high-efficiency heat pump. If you had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you h...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on customer responses to rebates for high-efficiency heat pumps and the influence of various factors on their decision to install them. It includes response scales and instructions for data collection.
_ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused heat pumps provided by the retailers Cross-Influence [CI Series] READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUENCES CI1. Before participating in the Green Heat program in 2017, had you at any...
AI summary This document presents survey questions related to customer participation in the Green Heat program and previous involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. It explores whether prior participation influenced decisions to install high-efficiency heat pumps and consider energy savings in home heating system choices.
account the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different heating systems for your home. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) CI3. Before participating in the Green Heat program in 2017, had you at any time in the pa...
AI summary This text contains survey questions related to customer awareness and satisfaction with Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials for energy efficiency programs, specifically the Green Heat program and high-efficiency heat pumps. It explores the influence of these materials on customer decisions and actions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report S3. For the next few statements, I’d like you to think back to the point when you started to consider installing a mini-split heat pump. On a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 equals “not...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on customer concerns related to installing mini-split heat pumps and participating in the Green Heat rebate program. It explores issues such as equipment selection, reliability, cost, and rebate application processes.
4% U2. In addition to your newly installed high-efficiency mini-split heat pump, is there another heating system used for heating in your home? Other Heating Systems Installed 2017 Sample Size 50 Yes 72% No 28% U3. What type of heating sys...
AI summary The text presents survey data from 2017 regarding the use of heating systems in homes, including the installation of high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps and other heating systems. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report related to the Existing Residential Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia.
2 Base: Respondents who had not previously decided to install a heat pump prior to the program component Project No. 6138 108 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FRM3. If the program re...
AI summary The text discusses a survey on the likelihood of postponing heat pump purchases without the Green Heat program rebate. The mean response was 4.3 on a scale from 0 to 10, indicating moderate likelihood of postponement.
a heat pump without the program component FRM4a. Before you heard about the Green Heat Program, had you already made the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump model? Previously Decided to Install High Efficiency Heat Pump 2017 Sa...
AI summary The text includes survey data about participants' decisions to install high-efficiency heat pumps before the Green Heat Program and their willingness to pay for such installations without the rebate. It references Efficiency Nova Scotia's rebate program and a 2017 DSM Evaluation.
where 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the influence of each of the following in your decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump. 2017 Influence of Factors on Decision to Have High Efficiency Heat Pum...
AI summary This text presents survey data on the influence of various factors on the decision to install high-efficiency heat pumps, with respondents rating the influence on a scale from 0 to 10. It also asks participants about prior participation in other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs before joining the Green Heat program in 2017.
out the program component CI1. Before participating in the Green Heat program in 2017, had you at any time in the past already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program? Previous Participation in Another ENS Program Component...
AI summary This text discusses a survey question about previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs before joining the Green Heat program in 2017. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report and mentions a project number.
DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report CI2a. Your previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program was a major factor in your decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump in your home. Previous Participation in Another ENS Program...
AI summary The text discusses survey responses related to the influence of previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs on decisions to install high-efficiency heat pumps and to seek information about energy-efficient heating systems.
on in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program and what you learned by participating in this program, you asked a contractor or a distributor about energy efficient heating systems for your home. 2017 Previous Participation in Another ENS Program...
AI summary The text discusses participants' previous involvement in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program and how it influenced their decision-making regarding energy-efficient heating systems, particularly in considering energy bill savings when evaluating options.
ow/Refused - Base: Respondents who had previously seen ENS promotional materials CI4b. The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted you to ask a contractor or a distributor about energy efficie...
AI summary A survey indicates that 56% of respondents who saw Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials were prompted to consult a contractor or distributor about energy-efficient heating systems, and 56% considered energy bill savings when evaluating heating systems.
iency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted you to take into account the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different heating systems for your home. Previously Saw Energy Efficiency Promotional Mater...
AI summary A survey indicates that 72% of respondents who had previously seen Efficiency Nova Scotia promotional materials agreed that they considered energy bill savings when evaluating heating systems for their homes. The survey sample size was 36.
ves, how could Efficiency Nova Scotia improve the Green Heat program? PROBE: Anything else? Recommendations to Improve Green Heat 2017 Sample Size 50 Advertise the program component more or in a better way 24% Offer more information on the...
AI summary The text presents survey results from 2017 regarding recommendations to improve the Green Heat program. Respondents suggested improvements such as better advertising, more information on equipment, improved communication, and increased rebates. A significant portion of respondents had no recommendations or did not know.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report On-site Visit Protocols The Evaluator prepared a standardized site-visit protocol for collecting relevant information. Under the old path, which was the only path available when...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) developed standardized on-site visit protocols to evaluate Green Heat, biomass, and heat pump projects. These protocols focused on verifying the accuracy of tracked savings data and ensuring new heating systems displaced existing electric heating. The process involved reviewing system characteristics and usage patterns to confirm proper installation and performance.
Site Primary Heating Source: Primary Heating System Type: Primary Heating System Capacity: % Total Heating from Primary Source (Participant Declaration): Is the Equipment Still in Place? (Y/N): Secondary Heating System In the Tracking Shee...
AI summary The document contains forms and data collection tools related to heating systems in residential homes, focusing on primary and secondary heating sources, equipment status, and usage patterns as part of an efficiency program evaluation.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Notes: Existing Cooling System Existing A/C Prior to Heat Pump installation? (Y/N): Cooling System Type (i.e., Window A/C, Stand-alone A/C, etc.): Site Information In the Tracking Validated On Sheet Si...
AI summary This document is an appendix report from the 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on residential programs managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes a form to collect information about existing cooling systems and heat pump installations, such as system type, model numbers, and performance metrics.
OTHERWISE MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [Your previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] was a major factor in your decision to install a [EQUIPMENT] in your home. CI2/4b. [You...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs and promotional materials on residential customers' decisions to install energy-efficient equipment, specifically heating systems. It includes survey questions and formulas related to free-ridership calculation in the context of a 2017 DSM Evaluation.
OTHERWISE MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [Your previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] was a major factor in your decision to install a [EQUIPMENT] in your home. CI2/4b. [You...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs and promotional materials on customer decisions to install energy-efficient equipment, particularly heating systems. It includes a calculation method for revised free-ridership based on customer responses.
ram Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Algorithm – Mini-split Heat Pump in Electrically Heated Households Project No. 6138 133 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Rep...
AI summary This document discusses the evaluation of the 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the installation of high-efficiency heat pumps in electrically heated households and the decision-making process of participants.
00% had you already made the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump IF 2. No, DK OR REF: FRM4a = 0% model? FRM5. [ASK IF FRM4=1] If you had not received the rebate from Efficiency FRM5 = Answer x 10% Nova Scotia, would you have pa...
AI summary The text outlines a survey or form (FRM) related to customer decisions regarding the installation of high-efficiency heat pumps and the influence of rebates from Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes scoring mechanisms and consistency checks to evaluate customer responses and potential free-ridership.
ised Free-Ridership IF CI=2, Revised FR = FR .75 IF CI=3, Revised FR = FR .50 Project No. 6138 135 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report EPI: 2017 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's residential program highlights a decrease in LED lamp installations per household, suggesting fewer incandescent lamps are present. The Evaluator recommends tracking lamp types to assess future savings potential if other lamp types are eligible for replacement.
ipants’ homes to analyze the savings potential that can be tapped if general-service lamp types other than incandescents are made eligible for replacement. Project No. 6138 136 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM E...
AI summary The document outlines a survey questionnaire for participants of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) service under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program. The survey aims to gather feedback from participants to help evaluate and improve the service.
ls) 4. (Turns off AV equipment too quickly) 5. (Takes up too much room) 96. (Other [SPECIFY: _]) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Participation [P Series] P1. What was the SINGLE most important reason you agreed to participate in the Efficie...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer participation in the Efficient Product Installation Service, including reasons for participation, presence during installation, and receipt of information about energy-efficient products. These questions are part of an evaluation of a residential energy efficiency program.
visit from the installer? DO NOT READ, CODE ONE ONLY 1. Yes, I received some information 2. No, I did not receive any information 98. (Don’t recall) Behaviour Changes [C Series] C1. After participating in the program, did you start doing,...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to customer behavior changes and satisfaction with energy efficiency programs. It asks participants whether they started or increased energy-saving actions after program participation and rates their satisfaction with the Efficient Product Installation Service.
lems did you have with the products installed in your home? 96. (RECORD VERBATIM: _) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Barriers to Action [B Series] B1. [ASK IF YES IN P3] Were there any energy efficiency products recommended through the Effi...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on barriers to action and customer experiences with product installations. It includes questions about recommended products not installed, reasons for non-installation, and perceived barriers to energy efficiency upgrades. The context is an evaluation of the 2017 DSM program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Recommendations (R Series) R1. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the Efficient Product Installation Service? PROBE: Anything else? [DO NOT READ, A...
AI summary The document presents survey questions from the 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on recommendations for improving the Efficient Product Installation Service and assessing free-ridership related to LED bulb installations. It includes options for additional products, communication improvements, and quality of service.
prior to learning about the Efficient Product Installation Service? [CODE ONE ONLY] 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Project No. 6138 143 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report...
AI summary The text is a survey excerpt from a 2017 DSM Evaluation Appendix Report, focusing on customer awareness and behavior related to the Efficient Product Installation Service, particularly LED bulb installations. It includes questions about prior decisions and willingness to pay for LED bulbs without the service.
please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE – ASK FR3 SEQUENCE IN ORDER/DO NOT RANDOMIZE] FR3a. If the service had not been offer...
AI summary The text presents a survey asking respondents to rate the likelihood of purchasing and installing LED bulbs without the service, and to rate the importance of factors influencing their decision. The survey is part of an evaluation of an existing residential energy efficiency program in Nova Scotia.
Responses a. The installation of energy-efficient products, _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused at no charge, offered by the service _ 97 Not applicable b. Information or advice provided by the _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused servi...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to the installation of energy-efficient products and the influence of previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. It includes questions on prior participation, promotional materials, and the impact of previous experiences on the decision to install energy-efficient products.
iciency Nova Scotia promotional materials advertising the benefits of energy efficiency? 1. Yes 2. No 98. Don’t know 99. Prefer not to say Project No. 6138 145 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appen...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on residential energy efficiency decisions and inquiries about additional energy-efficient product installations following participation in the Efficient Product Installation Service.
etired any old appliances on your own? 1. Yes 2. No [GO TO D SERIES] 98. (Don’t know/Don’t recall) [GO TO D SERIES] 99. (Refused) [GO TO D SERIES] SO2. [IF SO1= YES, THEN ASK] I just want to make sure I understand - After you participated...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process related to customer actions after participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service, including the installation of energy-efficient products or retirement of old appliances without program assistance. It also asks about receiving financing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Now, I will specifically talk about the additional actions you took on your own after participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service. SO4a. [IF SO3 = 2 or 3 Yes/some or ‘NO’] What, if any,...
AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation, focusing on participants' additional energy-efficient product installations after engaging with the Efficient Product Installation Service. It includes a list of products and follow-up questions about quantity and rebate receipt.
at the cashier on the [INSERT ANSWER FROM SO4a] you purchased? [REPEAT FOR EACH ANSWER TO SO4a] 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Project No. 6138 147 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appe...
AI summary The text is a survey form related to a residential energy efficiency program, asking participants about appliance retirement and the influence of the Efficient Product Installation Service on their decisions. It includes demographic and program participation questions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report EPI: PARTICIPANT SURVEY RESULTS The participant survey results are presented in the following tables. In total, 63 interviews were completed with homeowners, and 37 interviews wi...
AI summary The document presents participant survey results from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation, highlighting survey methodology and the installation of a smart power strip for audio-visual equipment in a household as part of the program.
2017 Most Important Motivation Other Important Motivations Reasons for Participating Home- Home- Tenants Total Tenants Total owners owners Sample Size 37 63 100 36 62 98 To save on energy/energy costs 49% 68% 67% 17% 6% 7% Wanted energy-ef...
AI summary The text presents survey results on participants' motivations for joining energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. The primary motivation was saving on energy costs, with a higher percentage among homeowners. Other motivations included receiving energy-efficient upgrades and environmental protection, though these were less common.
11% 10% 10% P4. Did your household receive information about energy-efficient products during the visit from the installer? 2017 Received Information Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 33 57 90 Yes 70% 74% 74% No 12% 16% 16% Don’t recall...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about whether households received information on energy-efficient products during an installation visit and whether participants increased energy-efficiency actions after program participation. The data shows a high percentage of respondents who received information and increased energy-efficient behaviors.
36 8% 17% 64% 11% water Unplug items not in use 37 8% 14% 46% 32% Responses of don’t know are removed 2017 Total Behavioural Changes Sample Start Increase Already Do not do Size Doing Doing Doing Turn off my lights now 98 5% 15% 77% 3% Set...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer behavior related to energy and water conservation, showing percentages of respondents who are already practicing certain behaviors, those who plan to start, and those who do not engage in these practices. The data highlights varying levels of participation in energy-saving actions such as unplugging devices, using cold water, and reducing water usage.
wasting water 98 8% 15% 74% 4% Unplug items not in use 98 14% 11% 44% 31% Responses of don’t know are removed Project No. 6138 155 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report C1k. Did you eithe...
AI summary The text presents survey data on participant behavior changes after joining an energy-efficiency program, with responses indicating actions such as unplugging unused items and water conservation efforts. The data is part of an evaluation of the 2017 DSM program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
SM Evaluation – Appendix Report C1k. Did you either start doing or increase doing any other energy-efficiency actions at home, after participating in the program? Specify those actions.
AI summary The text asks participants if they initiated or increased other energy-efficiency actions at home after participating in the program, requesting specific details about those actions.
2017 Other Actions Started or Increased after EPI Participation Tenants Homeowners Total (%) (%) (%) Sample Size 37 63 100 Yes, started or increased other energy efficiency actions at home 11% 35% 34% No 89% 62% 63% Don’t know - 3% 3% Tena...
AI summary The data shows that 34% of participants in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program took other energy efficiency actions after participation, with 35% of homeowners and 11% of tenants starting or increasing actions. The most common action among homeowners was installing new heating systems or heat pumps (36%).
- 14% 13% Installed solar panels 1 5% 5% Installed pipe insulation and water heater tank wrap - 5% 4% Bought energy efficient appliances - 5% 4% Use appliances more efficiently/run dishwasher at night 1 - - Others 1 18% 18% Base: Participa...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency actions taken by participants, showing a decrease in the percentage of participants who installed solar panels and an increase in those who participated in other actions. It also includes survey results on satisfaction with the Efficient Product Installation Service, with high mean satisfaction scores from both tenants and homeowners.
2017 Key Reasons Satisfied with EPI Overall Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 35 58 92 I like the installer who visited the home 23% 28% 27% Informative/Information received 17% 17% 17% Good service 14% 16% 15% Saves energy 6% 16% 15% L...
AI summary The text presents survey results from 2017 regarding customer satisfaction with the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. The majority of respondents were tenants and homeowners who participated in the program. The data shows that satisfaction was highest with the installer's service, followed by the information received and service quality, while lower satisfaction was reported for energy savings and lower energy bills.
with products installed B1. Were there any energy efficiency products recommended through the Efficient Product Installation Service that you chose not to have installed in your home? 2017 Products Recommended But Not Installed Tenants Hom...
AI summary The text asks respondents if they chose not to install energy efficiency products recommended by the Efficient Product Installation Service, and lists the percentage of tenants and homeowners who did not install recommended products.
following in preventing your household from making energy-efficiency upgrades? Please answer on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 means ‘not at all a barrier’ and 10 means ‘a major barrier’. 2017 Barriers for Making Energy-efficiency Tenants Hom...
AI summary The text presents survey data on barriers to energy-efficiency upgrades, with respondents rating factors like lack of money, time, and information. It also asks for recommendations to improve the Efficient Product Installation Service.
work Don’t know/Refused excluded from calculations R1. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the Efficient Product Installation Service? Anything else? Project No. 6138 160 Existing Residential Program Efficienc...
AI summary The document asks for recommendations to improve the Efficient Product Installation Service and references an evaluation report on the Existing Residential Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia from 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report 2017 Participant Suggestions to Improve EPI Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 37 63 100 Improve communication 3% 10% 9% Offer more information on the products installed - 8% 8...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report summarizes participant suggestions for improving the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Key feedback includes improving communication, offering more product information, better advertising, and expanding product offerings. Most participants had no recommendations or did not know.
8% 8% Multiple responses R2. Which other energy-efficiency products would you like to have had installed through the Efficient Product Installation Service? 2017 Energy-efficiency Products that Respondents Would Have Liked Installed Tenant...
AI summary Respondents expressed interest in having additional energy-efficiency products installed, such as power bars and solar panels, through the Efficient Product Installation Service. Some respondents had already planned to install LED bulbs before learning about the service.
sure I understand - Before you learned about the Efficient Product Installation Service, you had already made the decision to purchase and install LED bulbs in your home? Project No. 6138 161 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Sc...
AI summary The text discusses a survey about whether residents would have paid for LED bulbs if Efficiency Nova Scotia had not installed them for free as part of the Efficient Product Installation Service. The survey includes responses from tenants and homeowners.
installed these LED bulbs at no charge as part of the Efficient Product Installation Service, would you have paid the full cost of the LED bulbs, which is approximately $6 per bulb? 2017 Would Have Paid for Full LED Cost in Tenants Homeown...
AI summary The text discusses a survey conducted as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report, focusing on participant responses regarding the Efficient Product Installation Service (EPI) and their willingness to pay for LED bulbs if the service had not been available. The data includes responses from tenants and homeowners.
lations Base: Participants that had LED bulbs installed through EPI Base: Participants who gave rating of 5 or higher for FR3a Base: Participants that had a quantity of more than one LED bulb FR4. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the imp...
AI summary The text presents survey data on participants who had LED bulbs installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, rating the influence of factors such as free installation and service staff advice on their decision to install energy-efficient products in their homes.
8 6.1 48 6.1 76 6.1 service staff Base: Participants who had LED bulbs installed through EPI Don’t know/Refused/Not applicable excluded from calculations Project No. 6138 163 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Eva...
AI summary The text presents survey data on participant overlap in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, focusing on previous participation in ENS services before joining the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It shows that 25% of respondents had previously participated in another ENS service.
9% 69% Don’t know/Prefer not to say 6% 6% 6% Base: Respondents who had LED bulbs installed through EPI CI2. For the following statement, please indicate whether you agree or disagree. Your previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary The text presents survey results on customer perceptions of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, specifically focusing on how participation in ENS services influenced decisions to install energy-efficient products. It also asks respondents about prior exposure to ENS promotional materials before participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service.
ient Product Installation Service in [DATE], had you at any time in the past already seen Efficiency Nova Scotia promotional materials advertising he benefits of energy efficiency? Previously Seen Energy-efficiency Promotional Materials 20...
AI summary This text discusses a survey conducted in 2017 regarding the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on residents' decisions to install energy-efficient products. It includes data on how many respondents had previously seen the materials and their perceived influence on installation decisions.
otia greatly influenced your decision to have energy-efficient products installed in your home. Please use a scale of 0-10 where 0=“COMPLETELY DISAGREE” and 10 =“COMPLETELY AGREE”. Previously Seen ENS Energy-efficiency Promotional 2017 Mat...
AI summary The text asks respondents about the influence of ENS promotional materials on their decision to install energy-efficient products and whether they installed additional products or retired old appliances after participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service.
d - After you participated in the Efficient Product Installation Service, you installed additional energy-efficient products or retired old appliances on your own. Is that correct? 2017 Installed Additional Products or Retired Appliances A...
AI summary The text discusses participants in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program who installed additional energy-efficient products or retired old appliances after program participation. It also asks if they received financing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs for these actions.
- - SO3. Have you received financing or rebates from any other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for these additional energy-efficient products or appliances retired? 2017 Received Other Financing/Rebates Tenants Homeowners Total (#) (%) (%)...
AI summary The text asks if respondents received financing or rebates from Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for additional energy-efficient products or appliances retired. The data shows that 5% of homeowners and 23% of all respondents received financing or rebates for some products, while 72% received none. The sample size is based on those who installed additional products or retired appliances after participating in the EPI program.
2017 Other Products Installed After Participating Tenants Homeowners Total (#) (%) (%) Sample Size 9 20 31 ENERGY STAR refrigerator 1 25% 20% Heat pump - 15% 14% ENERGY STAR clothes washer 2 10% 10% Stove - 10% 10% Clothes dryer 2 10% 10%...
AI summary The text presents data on the installation of energy-efficient products by tenants and homeowners in 2017, showing the number and percentage of installations for various appliances and systems, with a focus on ENERGY STAR and LED products.
5% 5% Microwave 1 5% 5% Energy-efficient heating system/heater - 5% 5% Programmable thermostats - 5% 5% Freezer 1 - - Smart power strip/smart power bars 1 - - Dehumidifier 1 - - Others 2 10% 10% None - 20% 19% Don’t know - - - Base: Respon...
AI summary The text presents data on appliance installations and retirements following participation in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, excluding those who received financing or rebates from other Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) services. It includes percentages for various appliance categories, with some categories showing no responses.
2017 Total Other Products Installed After Participating Received an Mean Number Sample Instant Rebate Purchased and Sample Size Size (% saying Installed yes) LED bulbs 2 9.1 2 - ENERGY STAR refrigerator 5 1.0 6 2% ENERGY STAR clothes washe...
AI summary The data shows the number of products installed after participating in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program and the percentage of participants who received an instant rebate. The sample size and mean number of products purchased and installed are provided for various items like LED bulbs, ENERGY STAR appliances, and programmable thermostats.
Appliances Retired Outside of a Rebate or 2017 Assistance from Other Service, after Participating in EPI Tenants Homeowners Total (#) (%) (%) Sample Size 9 20 31 Stove - 25% 24% Refrigerator 1 20% 20% Laundry machine/washer/dryer 1 15% 15%...
AI summary The text presents data on appliances retired by participants in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program outside of rebates or assistance from other services. It shows the distribution of appliance types retired by tenants and homeowners, with a focus on the sample size and percentages.
s were installed (applied to all three samples). To establish an installation rate with an acceptable margin of error, 55 participants who received smart power controllers were included in the sample. In the fall, 10 additional visits were...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for verifying the installation rates of energy efficiency products, including smart power controllers, and collecting data on product usage and removal reasons during on-site visits. The focus is on ensuring accurate savings calculations for the Efficiency Nova Scotia residential program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Domestic Hot Water (DHW) Related Products (Based on on-site observations and the contact’s declaration) Quantity in Quantity Explanation, Tank Size (Gal.) or Product Tracking She...
AI summary The document provides an appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation, detailing on-site observations and product quantities related to domestic hot water and smart power controllers. It also includes detailed calculations for unitary savings values for LED lamps.
on – Appendix Report EPI: DETAILED CALCULATIONS OF UNITARY SAVINGS VALUES This appendix presents the detailed calculations and assumptions used to establish the revised unitary savings. LED Lamps Table 3 lists the parameters and their valu...
AI summary This section provides detailed calculations for revised unitary savings values for LED lamps installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, using parameters and wattage pairings for both single-family homes and apartments.
(1) 1000 Table 3: Revised Unitary Savings Values by LED Category
AI summary The document presents Table 3, which outlines revised unitary savings values by LED category. This table is likely used for evaluating energy efficiency measures and their associated savings.
Unitary Savings Unitary Old New Displaced Operating Value for Single- Savings Value Type of LED Wattage Wattage Wattage Hours family Homes for Apartments (W) (W) (W) (hrs/day) (kWh/year) (kWh/year) 9 W replacing 40 W 40 9 31 2.7 30.6 30.6...
AI summary The text presents a table comparing the energy savings from replacing traditional light bulbs with LED alternatives, showing the wattage of old and new bulbs, displaced operating wattage, and energy savings for single-family homes and apartments.
W G25 40 7 33 2.7 32.5 32.5 5 W Chandelier E12 40 5 35 2.7 34.5 34.5 LED Nightlights Table 4 below lists the parameters and their values applied in Equation 1 for LED nightlights installed through EPI in 2017 and the resulting unitary savi...
AI summary The text provides data on LED nightlights and holiday lights installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, including wattage, hours of operation, and unitary savings values for single-family homes and apartments.
12 12 Unitary Savings [kWh/year] 28.5 28.5 LED Holiday Lights Table 5 below lists the parameters and their values applied to calculate the unitary savings value for LED holiday lights installed through EPI in 2017.
AI summary The document provides a table with unitary savings data for LED holiday lights installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, including a value of 28.5 kWh/year.
28.5 28.5 LED Holiday Lights Table 5 below lists the parameters and their values applied to calculate the unitary savings value for LED holiday lights installed through EPI in 2017.
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of unitary savings value for LED holiday lights installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2017, referencing Table 5 which contains the relevant parameters and their values.
Table 5: Revised Unitary Savings Values for LED Holiday Lights Parameter Value Source Proportion of Old Large Incandescent Sets Returned 37 % Tracking Report (35 lamps per set) Proportion of Old Mini Incandescent Sets Returned 32 % Trackin...
AI summary The table presents revised unitary savings values for LED holiday lights, including the proportion of old incandescent sets returned, their wattage, and the displaced wattage per exchange. The data is sourced from tracking reports and literature, with calculations used to determine average old wattage and displaced wattage.
W/set Displaced Wattage (per exchange) (99.6 W – 5.6 W) = 94.0 W Calculation Literature and 2013 Annual Hours of Operation 5.8 h/day × 40 days/yr = 232 h/year participant survey Number of new LED sets used to replace the 2 old sets 2 Track...
AI summary The document calculates energy savings from replacing old LED sets with new ones and discusses the calculation of annual unitary savings value for faucet aerators installed through EPI as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Faucet Aerators The following equations are used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for the faucet aerators installed through EPI. ( 2) ∆ º 365 0.1337 º The base domestic hot water consumpti...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report discusses the calculation of annual unitary savings values for faucet aerators installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It outlines equations used to determine domestic hot water consumption values and provides parameters and resulting savings values in Table 6.
Table 6: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Low-flow Faucet Aerators Value for Value for Parameter Symbol Single-family Source Apartments Homes Baseline Flow Rate [gpm] qbase 1.2 1.2 2003 Aquacraft Study2 Low-flow Rate [gpm] qlow 0.94 0.94...
AI summary The table presents revised unitary savings values for low-flow faucet aerators, including parameters such as baseline and low-flow rates, number of people per household, hot water usage, and efficiency of electric water heaters, with sources cited for each value.
∆TH2O 79 79 2011 OPA [°F] Electric Water Heater Efficiency η 97% 97% Pennsylvania TRM5 Unitary Savings [kWh/year] - 98 95 Calculation Low-flow Showerheads The equation below is used to determine the annual unitary savings values for the lo...
AI summary The document discusses the efficiency of electric water heaters and low-flow showerheads in residential settings, referencing studies and technical manuals. It outlines parameters used to calculate annual unitary savings for energy efficiency programs implemented by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
EPI 2017 site visits. nshowerheads 1.5 1 Household [showers] Apartments: assumption. Average Shower Time per tshower 8.3 8.3 Mayer and Oreo8 Person [min/shower] Percentage of Hot Water Used %DHW 73% 73% CBEEDAC9 in Showers Specific Heat of...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency measures related to showerheads and electric water heaters, including average shower time, hot water usage, efficiency ratings, and savings from flow rate reductions. This information is likely used for energy efficiency modeling or program evaluation.
54 310 of 0.75 gpm Flow rate reduction 472 413 of 1 gpm 6 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Technical Reference Manual, State of Pennsylvania, June 2013, pp. 45 – 48. 7 Mayer, P. W., W. B. Oreo et al., Residential End Uses of Water,...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It references studies and formulas used to calculate annual unitary savings, including values from the OPA’s 2011 report and formulas for heat transfer in insulated cylinders.
the tank’s circumference before (Qtank) and after the addition of the tank wrap (Qtank+RSI 1.21). The heat losses are calculated using the following formulas of heat transfer in an insulated cylinder: ln (6) 2 (7) (8) (9) (10) ∙ (11) 11 On...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of heat losses in an insulated cylinder, using formulas for heat transfer. It references the Ontario Power Authority's Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List from 2010 and mentions Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report.
Table 8: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Hot Water Tank Wraps Value for Value for Parameter Symbol Single-family Source Apartments Homes Layer 1: Interior Insulation of Tank External Radius of the Layer [m] re 0.300 0.280 Giant12 Intern...
AI summary The text presents a table with revised unitary savings values for hot water tank wraps, including parameters such as thermal resistance, radii, and conductivity for different layers of insulation and tank wraps in single-family homes and apartments. The data is sourced from various references, including Giant and Frost King Insulation Blanket specifications.
temperature indoors 12 Giant Inc., Engineering Submittal Data Sheet 172ETE Models, < http://www.giantinc.com/tech-data/FT-172E-An.pdf > (Last accessed February 18, 2015). 13 Frost King Weatherization Products, Water Heater Insulation Blank...
AI summary The document references technical data sheets and product information related to energy efficiency measures, specifically from Giant Inc. and Frost King. It is part of an evaluation report for the 2017 Demand Side Management (DSM) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Value for Value for Parameter Symbol Single-family Source Apartments Homes OPA Prescriptive Temperature at the Internal Radius of Ti 60 60 Measures and the Cylinder [°C] Assumpti...
AI summary This appendix report from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation discusses parameters and calculations related to energy efficiency measures, including thermal efficiency, heat transfer, and unitary savings for tank wraps and smart power controllers for audiovisual equipment.
y Savings for Tank Wrap - 159 118 Calculation [kWh/year] Smart Power Controller for Audiovisual Equipment The unitary savings value associated with the use of a smart power controller has been established at 411 kWh per year based on a stu...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings from a smart power controller for audiovisual equipment, citing a study from South Africa, and references a residential lighting metering study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
ring Study Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report ABBREVIATIONS EPI Efficient Product Installation HOU Hours of use LED Light-emitting diode RDI Residential Direct Install UMP Uniform Methods Project Project No. 6138 188 Residential Lighting...
AI summary The document is a final report from Efficiency Nova Scotia on a residential lighting metering study. It includes abbreviations and a table of contents, indicating the focus on energy efficiency initiatives and residential lighting usage.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Econoler was commissioned by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) to conduct a metering study of LED lamps’ usage patterns to improve the accuracy of the energy and peak demand savings calculat...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia commissioned Econoler to study LED lamp usage patterns to improve the accuracy of energy and peak demand savings calculations for residential lighting measures. The study involved installing data collection devices in 75 households over three months, with data cleaning to ensure accuracy.
10% 2.14 23% 1.65 2.63 Weighted Overall HOU 100% 2.48 9% 2.37 2.84 To properly translate LEDs’ HOU values into peak demand savings, the Evaluator analyzed the HOU values specifically occurring during the peak demand period. These HOU value...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed LED HOU values during peak demand periods to calculate a peak-demand-to-energy ratio (PDER) for residential lighting measures. The average PDER of 0.161 W/kWh is significantly lower than the 0.249 W/kWh currently used by ENS, indicating a need for updated calculations.
rage PDER thus established is 0.161 W/kWh, which is much lower than the value of 0.249 W/kWh currently applied by ENS to residential lighting measures. Table below shows the PDER results by room type. Table 2: Peak-demand-to-energy Ratios...
AI summary The document presents the Peak-demand-to-energy Ratios (PDER) by room type, showing an overall weighted average of 0.161 W/kWh, which is lower than the current value of 0.249 W/kWh applied by ENS to residential lighting measures. The table provides average PDER values, number of data collection devices, margin of error, and relative error for different room types.
0.171 27 10% 0.054 32% Weighted Average 0.161 257 100% 0.016 10% Project No. 6138 192 Residential Lighting Metering Study Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report In conclusion, the daily HOU value of 2.48 hours/day established is comparable to...
AI summary The study establishes a daily HOU value of 2.48 hours/day for residential lighting, comparable to the previously used 2.7 hours/day for LED lamps installed through EPI. It also determines a new PDER value of 0.161 W/kWh ±0.016 W/kWh for indoor lamps, lower than the previously applied 0.249 W/kWh, and recommends 0.228 W/kWh for outdoor lamps.
stalled indoors. As for lamps installed outdoors, which were not included in the sample, a value of 0.228 W/kWh can be applied, which has been estimated based on typical usage during winter nights. Project No. 6138 193 Residential Lighting...
AI summary This study focuses on estimating the average daily hours of use for residential LED lamps in Nova Scotia and their alignment with peak demand periods. It was conducted by Econoler for Efficiency Nova Scotia to improve the accuracy of energy and peak demand savings estimates in various programs.
s. The results of this study are expected to help improve the accuracy of energy and peak demand savings estimation in the EPI and Instant Savings program components, as well as for Codes & Standards. To carry out this assignment, Econoler...
AI summary This study aims to improve the accuracy of energy and peak demand savings estimation in the EPI and Instant Savings programs, as well as for Codes & Standards. Econoler and Equilibrium Engineering collaborated on the methodology, analysis, and data collection for the study, which follows the Residential Lighting Evaluation Protocol of the UMP.
Final Report 1 DATA COLLECTION This section describes the steps taken to complete the data-collection process. The EPI program component structure allows every participant to have all the incandescent lamps in use at their home replaced by...
AI summary The data collection process for the EPI program focuses on LED lamps due to program structure and participant eligibility, with implications for savings calculations and the Instant Savings program. The report discusses recruitment of participants for data collection.
f Instant Savings, a sample of its participants were questioned about their lamp usage. This point is further discussed in the 2017 Instant Savings evaluation report. 1.1 Participant Recruitment Participants of the RDI and EPI program comp...
AI summary The document discusses the recruitment of participants for a metering study involving the RDI and EPI programs. Participants were selected based on criteria such as having at least 10 LED lamps and multiple RDI/EPI measures installed. A total of 75 participants were selected, with 50 from RDI 2016 and 25 from EPI 2017, and most kept data collection devices in place throughout the study.
household size of the metered sample was 2.1 people, which is similar to the average of all EPI participants in 2017 (2.2 people). Each of the metered participating homes was a single-family home. Project No. 6138 195 Residential Lighting...
AI summary The study analyzed 75 households in the Residential Lighting Metering Study, noting that 51% were low-income, slightly higher than the overall EPI participant average. The study found that income levels did not significantly affect the validity of the data, as supported by other studies.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report The Uniform Methods Project Protocol for Residential Lighting Evaluation17 states that metering several weeks before and after an equinox is an appropriate method to obtain HOU representative of the annu...
AI summary The report discusses the metering schedule for a study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which was divided into three rounds over nearly a year. Due to the timing and the need to capture peak electricity demand, the study used an annualization method as recommended by the Uniform Methods Project Protocol.
25 3 March 27, 2017 August 22, 2017 24 1.3 Data Collection Devices The data collection devices used were the TOU Smart Logger model from DENT Instruments. These devices are equipped with a light sensor that detects whether the lamp is in u...
AI summary The study used TOU Smart Logger devices from DENT Instruments to collect data on lamp usage, recording the percentage of time the lamp was in use every 15 minutes. Participants were informed about the devices' sensitivity and advised not to move or change their settings.
ential Light Metering Study. Retrieved from http://www.neep.org/sites/default/files/resources/1340978.pdf 20 NMR Group, Inc. (2014). Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study. Retrieved from http://www.neep.org/sites/default/files/...
AI summary The document references several studies and reports related to residential lighting efficiency, including a light metering study, a Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study, and an Efficiency Maine Retail Lighting Program Evaluation Report. These studies provide insights into energy usage patterns and efficiency savings from lighting measures.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report Table 4: Criteria by Room Type for Identifying Metered Lamps with Extremely Low HOU Values Room Use Category Criterion Room Type Kitchen Dining Room Living Room / Play Room Bedroom High-use Considered ex...
AI summary The document presents criteria for identifying metered lamps with extremely low HOU (Hours of Use) values based on room type, distinguishing between high-use and low-use categories. It also mentions wide differences from participants' estimated HOU values.
under 0.05 hours a day Basement Hallway / Staircase 2.3.2 Wide Differences from Participants’ Estimated HOU Values A third test was performed to check whether the measured HOU values were widely different from the HOU values that the parti...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of measured HOU values against participants' estimates, noting significant differences and the use of a 300% threshold to flag outliers. It also describes the installation of data collection devices in various room types to capture diverse LED lamp usage patterns.
oach was followed in order to ensure that the average HOU value reflects the various usage patterns which are expected to vary according to occupant behaviour in different types of rooms in a home. Project No. 6138 201 Residential Lighting...
AI summary The study aimed to understand the average HOU of LED lamps in households, with a focus on room-specific usage patterns. Adjustments were made to room type classifications to improve sample robustness and provide deeper insights into LED lamp usage.
0 3 4 0 0 7 Other 48 0 5 1 0 0 42 Total 526 2 30 44 13 3 434 Total (%) 100% 0.4% 5.7% 8.4% 2.5% 0.6% 82.5% Project No. 6138 203 Residential Lighting Metering Study Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report 3 HOURS OF USE ANALYSIS Since data coll...
AI summary The document discusses the analysis of hours of use (HOU) for residential lighting, noting that data collected over three months may not represent annual averages. The Uniform Methods Project (UMP) recommends annualizing data using sinusoidal modeling, but results were unsatisfactory, leading to the adoption of a simple mean approach.
cymaine.com/docs/Efficiency-Maine-Retail-Lighting-Program-Evaluation-Report-2015.pdf 27 Kema. (2014). California Upstream and Residential Lighting Impact Evaluation. Work Order 28 (WO28) Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.calmac.org/p...
AI summary This section discusses the methodology used in a residential lighting metering study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines the use of sinusoidal regression to analyze hours of use (HOU) data, with specific criteria for determining the quality of the regression fit, including constraints on the sine coefficient and intercept values.
be lower than 10; › The standard error of the sine coefficient must be lower than 1; › The intercept ( ) must be higher than or equal to 0; and › The intercept ( ) must be lower than 24. The data analysis and statistical software tool, Sta...
AI summary The document describes a statistical analysis using sinusoidal regression to evaluate lamp usage data, with specific criteria for acceptable regression results. The analysis was conducted using Stata IC 12, and 272 lamps met the defined criteria for a good fit.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report All those lamps that did not meet one or more of these criteria were considered a poor fit for sinusoidal modelling. This was the case for 117 lamps, thus indicating that the metered lamps’ usage was not...
AI summary The report discusses the analysis of lamps that did not meet criteria for sinusoidal modelling, leading to the rejection of annualization results for 117 lamps. Instead, a simple mean of daily HOU is recommended for these lamps. Table 6 summarizes the results for lamps deemed a good fit, including statistical parameters like intercept, sine coefficient, and t-statistics.
s employed. It is difficult to know whether similar poor statistical results also occurred in past metering studies because most of these studies did not report their detailed statistical results. Project No. 6138 206 Residential Lighting...
AI summary The document discusses the use of a simple mean of daily HOU approach in a residential lighting metering study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia. Due to the ineffectiveness of the sinusoidal model, the Evaluator calculated a simple mean for each lamp, using data collected over nearly an entire year. The results indicated that the data was representative of lamp usage at the equinox, which theoretically corresponds to the annual average.
.2.1 HOU per Lamp The simple mean HOU of each lamp during the metering period was calculated using the following equation: ∑ Where: › is the number of HOU on day d; › is the total number of days in the metering period; and › Is the mean da...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating Hours of Use (HOU) per lamp, by room type, and overall average HOU. It provides equations for calculating mean HOU and explains the weighting methodology based on the Uniform Methods Project (UMP) recommendations.
since this study is the current source for the HOU value applied for residential lighting calculations. 30 NMR Group, Inc. (2014). Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study. Retrieved from http://www.neep.org/sites/default/files/re...
AI summary The document references studies on residential lighting hours-of-use (HOU) values used in efficiency programs, citing multiple sources including the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships and studies by NMR Group, Inc., Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, and The Cadmus Group.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships Study In the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships lighting metering study, 5,730 lamps were metered in 848 households in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York,...
AI summary This report discusses a study on residential lighting efficiency, comparing the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships metering study with Efficiency Nova Scotia's program. It highlights differences in participant selection and lamp usage patterns, emphasizing how EPI's approach ensures consistent usage of efficient lamps.
t result in any difference in the efficient lamps’ hours of use. Consequently, the HOU value of “all lamps” in the Northeast study was selected and applied in the calculations of EPI’s energy savings. In this Northeast study, the data-coll...
AI summary The study analyzed lamp usage data collected between 2012 and 2013, finding that efficient bulbs had higher HOU values than inefficient ones. The data was used to calculate energy savings for EPI, with results showing no significant differences in HOU based on home type or income, but a clear difference between efficient and inefficient bulbs.
d that this disparity should not be expected for the metering study conducted with EPI, since LEDs were systematically installed in all those sockets where incandescent lamps were previously found. Project No. 6138 211 Residential Lighting...
AI summary The document discusses a residential lighting metering study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia, comparing results from the Northeast study and the EPI study. The study highlights differences in average hours of use (HOU) between exterior and interior lamps, and it introduces a section on peak demand savings analysis, focusing on electricity demand peaks in Nova Scotia.
e peak demand period of the electricity system. The projected electricity demand peak period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. in the months of December to February on a non-holiday weekday. To estimate how the HOU values of LEDs...
AI summary The document discusses the analysis of peak demand savings from LED installations in Nova Scotia, focusing on the peak demand period between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. during December to February. A method involving HOU values and energy savings calculations is used to estimate peak demand savings, with certain loggers excluded due to insufficient data.
rooms, kitchens and living rooms) are gradually used more from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Between 6:30 and 7 p.m., lamp usage declines in the kitchen but increases in the living room, which seems reasonable. One element that could explain a porti...
AI summary The study analyzed residential LED lamp usage patterns, identifying differences in peak demand and energy consumption across various rooms and times of day. Outdoor lamps were excluded, affecting the peak-demand-to-energy ratio. The study involved 75 households and 526 lamps, with data from 83% of the lamps used in the analysis.
otia Final Report Figure 5: Site Visit Protocol – Data Collection Device Installation (2/3) Project No. 6138 218 Residential Lighting Metering Study Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report Figure 6: Site Visit Protocol – Data Collection Device...
AI summary The document outlines the site visit protocols for data collection device installation and retrieval as part of the Residential Lighting Metering Study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes figures depicting the process for installing and retrieving devices, as well as socket count assessments.
Final Report Figure 8: Site Visit Protocol – Socket count (1/3) Figure 9: Site Visit Protocol – Socket count (2/3) Project No. 6138 221 Residential Lighting Metering Study Efficiency Nova Scotia Final Report Figure 10: Site Visit Protocol...
AI summary The document provides an overview of statistical parameters used in the Residential Lighting Metering Study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It discusses regression coefficients, standard error, and t-statistic as measures of accuracy in estimating the relationship between HOU and daylight hours.
s calculated using the following equation: ∑ / 2 ∑ Where: › is the metered value of HOU associated with a number of daylight hours sin θ ; › is the predicted value of HOU from the regression model; › is the number of days in the metering p...
AI summary The text describes a statistical method for calculating a t-statistic to assess the significance of energy savings estimates, using a regression model and metered data. It references the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) for energy and water savings, and is part of a residential lighting metering study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
IF DK OR REF: EMPTY by at least one year? (Scale 0 to 10) PA4 Score: FR3b Project No. 6138 226 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FR3c. If the service had not been offered, what is the...
AI summary The text presents evaluation metrics and scoring criteria for a residential energy efficiency program, specifically focusing on the likelihood of LED bulb installations through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It outlines scoring scales and conditions for inconsistencies in responses.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report EPI: INTERNAL SPILLOVER METHODOLOGY Internal spillover was measured using a participant survey. Participants were asked whether following their participation in the program compo...
AI summary This report discusses the methodology used to measure internal spillover in Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM program. Internal spillover was determined through participant surveys, which assessed whether participants implemented additional energy efficiency measures beyond those directly supported by the program.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. The ratio of evaluated results to tracked results. This ratio expresses the Adjustment ratio adjustment made to tracked savings or other tracked values such as...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency and measurement, including accuracy, adjustment ratio, base case, bias, billing calibration, confidence interval, displaced wattage, and EnerGuide rating. These definitions are relevant to energy performance assessments and measurement protocols.
nergy performance. It is a measure of the efficiency of the building only and does not take into account occupant EnerGuide rating behaviour. It shows how energy efficient the home is through modelled heat losses of the home, based on seve...
AI summary The text explains several energy performance metrics, including EnerGuide ratings, effective useful life, equipment life, and equivalent CO2. These metrics are used to assess building efficiency, measure the lifespan of energy-saving measures, and quantify the warming impact of greenhouse gases.
Gross and net savings calculated by the Evaluator using the parameters (unitary savings values, installation rates, interactive effects, net-to-gross Evaluated savings ratio, etc.) validated or measured during the evaluation process. Unles...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency program evaluation, including gross and net savings, free-ridership, induced consumption, and interactive effects. It outlines the evaluation plan and first-year savings as central components of the assessment process.
DSM) results for the 2017 evaluation of the New Residential program. This program is comprised of one component: New Home Construction (NHC); the 2017 evaluation also included the Passive House pilot. Table 1 below lists the number of part...
AI summary The document presents the results of the 2017 evaluation of the New Residential program, which includes New Home Construction (NHC) and the Passive House pilot. It provides data on participation levels, gross savings, net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), and net savings for each component and the total program.
96.650 GWh 101.242 GWh Peak Demand Savings 0.909 MW 0.954 MW NHC Overview NHC encourages homeowners and builders to exceed energy efficiency building code requirements for new homes. Participation in NHC involves completing the following s...
AI summary The New Home Construction (NHC) program encourages energy efficiency in new homes by providing recommendations and inspections. Since May 2017, the program has used a new EnerGuide rating system to estimate annual energy use in gigajoules, while keeping rebate amounts unchanged.
lower than the annual figures from 2012 through 2016. Nonetheless, in 2017, NHC managed to achieve the highest per-participant net energy savings result since 2011, with 7.913 MWh per participant. New Residential Program ix New Residential...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that New Home Construction (NHC) achieved the highest per-participant net energy savings since 2011, with 7.913 MWh per participant, despite lower annual figures from 2012 through 2016.
ion Report Figure 1: Performance Overview of NHC (2011-20172) and Passive House (2017) Participation Net Savings 7.913 5.890 7.009 6.917 4.942 4.572 5.241 5.009 5.404 3.988 3.908 3.371 3.816 1,176 2.454 943 846 1.478 1.545 643 1.175 1.025...
AI summary The document presents a performance overview of New Home Construction (NHC) and Passive House programs from 2011 to 2017, showing participation numbers, net savings, energy savings, and peak demand savings. It highlights the market evaluation results of these programs over the period.
Energy Savings (GWh) Net Energy Savings per Participant (MWh) Peak Demand Savings (MW) Market Evaluation Highlights The participants and builders interviewed expressed moderately high satisfaction ratings for NHC, respectively averaging 6....
AI summary The evaluation of the New Home Construction (NHC) program highlights moderate satisfaction among participants and builders, with dissatisfaction primarily attributed to low rebate amounts and complex processes. Changes in participation measurement methods starting in 2013 also led to discrepancies in reported participant numbers across evaluation reports.
and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for New Residential Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 3.845 GWh 3.217 GWh 0.93 2.992 GWh Evaluation Results 3.838 GWh 3.212 GWh 1.05...
AI summary The evaluation of energy savings from the New Residential program shows slight decreases in gross savings but higher net savings due to changes in the NTGR value. The 2017 evaluation found that the program met peak demand savings targets but fell short of net energy savings goals, with participation at its lowest since 2011. Recommendations for improvement are provided.
ENS program components in the 2017 DSM Programs Evaluation Executive Summary, the Evaluator has the following recommendations to make for NHC. These recommendations can also be found in Appendix I. New Residential Program xii New Residenti...
AI summary This document outlines ENS program components and recommendations from the 2017 DSM Programs Evaluation Executive Summary, focusing on the New Residential Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia.
recommends conducting a new billing analysis in the next evaluation to establish an overestimation ratio specific to new houses under NHC and the new version of HOT2000. New Residential Program xiii New Residential Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is responsible for delivering energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, funded by Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia. Econoler was commissioned to evaluate ENS’s 2017 DSM program portfolio and assess the impact of energy efficiency codes and standards introduced in the province.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement C C R Product Rebates Program Instant Savings C C R R Home Energy Assessment C C C C Existing Residential Green Heat C C C C C Program Efficient Product Installation C C C C New Residential Progra...
AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business rebate initiatives, home energy assessments, and custom incentive programs. It highlights the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program and mentions the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, noting its start date and impact on process evaluation.
Solutions The process evaluation specifically targets the Retrofit service of the Custom program component. Due to the start date of the latest Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, SEM did not have any participants who achieved saving...
AI summary This document discusses the evaluation of the New Residential program, specifically the NHC component, which encourages energy-efficient construction in new homes. The program is fully funded through DSM funds since October 2015, and only electrically-heated households are eligible for funding after that date.
s were made to the NHC incentive structure over the last few years. The current incentive structure was introduced on May 1, 2017. The following incentives are currently available to NHC participants: › An incentive of $2,000 is provided f...
AI summary The document outlines the current incentive structure for New Home Construction (NHC) under Efficiency Nova Scotia, which was introduced on May 1, 2017. Incentives are provided based on energy efficiency standards such as ENERGY STAR certification, EnerGuide ratings, and energy use levels relative to the National Building Code.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report On September 1, 2017, NHC transitioned to a new EnerGuide rating system, thereby retiring the 0-100 rating system in favour of an estimated annual energy use in gigajoules. The incentive st...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) transitioned to a new EnerGuide rating system in 2017, which provides more accurate energy use information. ENS also launched a Passive House pilot offering $10,000 incentives to meet energy efficiency standards. The pilot was limited to 20 projects and filled by December 2016. NHC and the pilot aimed for 4.0 GWh in electricity savings and 0.9 MW in peak demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 1.3 Participation History Figure 2 below illustrates NHC’s evolution in participation levels as well as in net energy and peak demand savings from 2011 to 2017. The 2017 figures also includ...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights a decrease in participation in the New Home Construction (NHC) program compared to previous years, despite an increase in new registrations. The report notes that lower housing completions in Nova Scotia influenced participation levels. Although overall energy and peak demand savings were lower in 2017, the per-participant energy savings reached an all-time high.
Savings per Participant (MWh) Number of Housing Completions in Nova Scotia Percentage of NHC Participants 5 The number of participants shown in the figures refer to those participants who not only generated electrical savings, but also use...
AI summary This section discusses energy savings data from the New Home Construction (NHC) and Passive House programs in Nova Scotia from 2011 to 2017. It highlights gross energy savings and peak demand savings, referencing data from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation website.
meowners, and one was a builder. The main purpose of the interviews was to assess free-ridership. The interview guide and results are presented in Appendices VI and VII. Effective Useful Life Review As part of the 2017 evaluation, to exami...
AI summary The document discusses interviews conducted to assess free-ridership in energy efficiency programs and an evaluation of effective useful life (EUL) values used by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) in calculating lifetime energy savings. It also presents a survey of homeowners under the New Home Construction (NHC) program.
ticipate in NHC and determine which energy efficiency measures to install. The most important reasons for participation were to have a house that would save on energy costs/bills or to obtain rebates. When asked about what they consider im...
AI summary Survey participants in NHC valued energy cost reduction and efficiency measures highly, with some dissatisfaction over rebate amounts and process complexity. Key improvements suggested include higher rebates, simpler processes, and more eligible upgrades.
n (Performance Plus) at least once. The main reasons mentioned for not participating in NHC in 2017 were that the rebate was not worth the effort and that the program component was too complicated. New Home Construction 11 New Residential...
AI summary The 2017 NHC impact evaluation aims to assess the gross and net electrical energy savings and peak demand savings from the New Home Construction (NHC) and Passive House pilot programs. The evaluation revises gross savings calculations based on modelled energy savings, overestimation ratios, and peak demand savings.
mating- net-savings_0.pdf. (Last accessed November 21, 2016). 9 ENS considers a home to be “electrically heated” when the home heating system(s) provides all or most of the heating from electricity. New Home Construction 12 New Residential...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the calculation of modelled gross energy savings for new residential construction using the HOT2000 simulation tool. It compares to-code and as-built energy consumption levels to assess the impact of energy efficiency measures in new homes.
he savings achieved through NHC and the Passive House pilot also relate to measures affecting space heating consumption justifies applying the HEA overestimation ratio to the total energy consumption. It should be noted that the energy sav...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for New Home Construction (NHC) and the Passive House pilot, noting the use of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) overestimation ratio. It highlights the transition to a new version of HOT2000 for more accurate energy savings calculations and the recommendation to conduct billing analyses with NHC participants.
ings. However, the weight of each of these measures is unknown since they are all simultaneously inputted in the building simulations, so the savings attributed to each measure type are not available. Thus, the Evaluator estimated the weig...
AI summary The Evaluator estimated the contribution of different energy efficiency measures to savings in NHC and Passive House projects. Insulation was assigned the highest weight, followed by efficient heating systems and efficient lighting. In Passive House projects, insulation had an even higher weight due to stricter insulation requirements.
ings among total savings. Therefore, of all the Passive House pilot projects, insulation, efficient heating systems and efficient lighting were respectively assigned a weight of 70, 15 and 15 percent. In addition to using a weighted averag...
AI summary The document discusses the assignment of weights to insulation, heating systems, and lighting in Passive House pilot projects, as well as the revision of Effective Useful Life (EUL) values based on a literature review for measures in New Home Construction and Passive House projects.
.nwcouncil.org/measure/built-green- washington (Last accessed February 15, 2018) 12 GDS Associates, Inc., Measure Life Report: Residential and Commercial/Industrial Lighting and HVAC Measures, report prepared for the England State Program...
AI summary The text discusses the adjustment of effective useful life (EUL) for LED bulbs in Massachusetts, considering baseline increases due to the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2020. It also references the minimum efficiency level required by EISA for compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), which will take effect in 2021.
available on the type and wattage of efficient lighting installed through NHC, the Evaluator assumed the average lamp installed in a new construction has a wattage of 43 W, which is the wattage of a halogen incandescent lamp corresponding...
AI summary The document discusses the assumptions made regarding the average wattage of efficient lighting installed in new home construction, specifically comparing halogen incandescent lamps to LEDs. It references technical manuals and regulatory documents related to energy efficiency.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 8: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Lamps Halogen Incandescent Baseline – CFL Equivalent Baseline – Canadian Legislation18,19 American Legislation20 Typical 7 Years (2017-2023) 18...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the baseline evolution of LED lamps over their effective useful life, comparing halogen incandescent and CFL equivalents. It calculates an equivalent EUL value of 13.0 years and revised equivalent EUL values of 30.0 and 36.0 years for NHC and Passive House pilot projects, respectively.
on the minimum efficiency level of 45 lumens/watts required by the EISA regulation and on the assumed levels of 550 lumens for 40 W lamps, 800 lumens for 60 W lamps and 1,600 lumens for 100 W lamps. New Home Construction 21 New Residential...
AI summary The text references the minimum efficiency level of 45 lumens/watts required by the EISA and discusses assumptions about lumens for different wattage lamps. It also mentions a table related to energy and peak demand savings in new home construction.
Loss Factor 1.098 1.098 - Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.878 0.017 0.895 New Home Construction 22 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 10: Revised Gross Energy and Peak...
AI summary The document presents data from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the Passive House Pilot program. It includes metrics such as energy savings, peak demand savings, and effective useful life, providing insights into the program's performance.
s Factor 1.100 Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.014 4.2 Net-to-gross Ratio The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) serves to determine net savings, i.e. the energy savings that can be reliably attributed to a program compone...
AI summary The document discusses the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) and its role in determining net energy savings from program components, particularly focusing on free-ridership. It explains that free-ridership occurs when participants would have implemented energy efficiency measures without the program and outlines the methodology used to assess this, including telephone surveys and algorithms detailed in Appendix VIII.
0.948 0.006 A comparison of the energy and peak demand savings figures established through this evaluation and those calculated by ENS is presented in Table 13 and Table 14 below. New Home Construction 25 New Residential Program Efficiency...
AI summary This text compares energy and peak demand savings figures from ENS tracked savings and evaluation results for New Home Construction and the Passive House Pilot. The tables show discrepancies in net savings, with the evaluation results indicating higher energy savings for New Home Construction but lower savings for the Passive House Pilot.
NOT ACCEPT A RANGE] _ Response 96. (Did not receive that rebate) 97. (Don’t Know) 98. (Refused) [ASK FR2b IF, IN SAMPLE, TOTAL INCENTIVE=EMPTY] FR2b. Efficiency Nova Scotia funded a portion of the energy assessment that was performed by th...
AI summary The text includes survey responses and questions related to customer participation in energy efficiency programs, specifically asking about willingness to pay for energy assessments and the impact of the New Home Construction program on home efficiency decisions.
would have built or bought a standard house, designed to code, instead of a house with a high level of efficiency? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Project No. 6138 6 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the cost of energy-efficient upgrades and factors influencing decisions to build or buy energy-efficient homes, part of an evaluation of a residential energy efficiency program.
at you learned by participating in the program, you asked for a review of your new home plans. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) CI2c. [IF CI1=1] Because of your previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, particularly the New Home Construction program, and their awareness and influence of promotional materials on their decisions regarding energy efficiency in new homes.
ut energy efficiency equipment or upgrades d. Lack of interest e. Not convinced of the energy savings Recommendations for Program Improvements (R Series) [ASK ALL HOMEOWNERS] R1. Do you have any recommendations for improving the New Home C...
AI summary The text discusses homeowner feedback on the New Home Construction program, including reasons for not participating in energy efficiency upgrades and recommendations for program improvements. It also outlines demographic data collection for statistical purposes.
URVEY RESULTS The participant survey results are presented in the following tables. V3. Did you personally take part in the decision to participate in the New Home Construction program? 2015 2016 2017 Homeowner Involved in Decision to Part...
AI summary The text presents survey results about homeowner involvement in the New Home Construction (NHC) program, specifically regarding participation in the program and decisions about energy efficiency measures. The data includes percentages and sample sizes from 2015 to 2017.
2015 2016 2017 (%) (#) (#) Reasons for Participating – Homeowners Most Other Most Most Other Important Important Important Reasons Important Important Reason Reasons Reason Reason Reasons Sample Size 22 22 16 16 13 13 To have a house that...
AI summary The text presents survey data on homeowners' reasons for participating in energy efficiency programs, highlighting factors such as saving on energy costs, receiving rebates, and planning to implement energy-efficient measures.
21 6.3 17 6.4 13 5.2 program overall / / Don’t know/Refused excluded from calculations Base: Respondents were involved from the initial planning and design stage Base: Respondents who were involved after the plans for home were finalized,...
AI summary The text presents data and questions related to the New Residential Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on customer involvement in the New Home Construction program and their prior planning for energy-efficient features.
you decided to participate in the New Home Construction program, your home design already included all the energy efficient features that were identified in the review of your home plans? Already Made Decision to Build House with Energy Ef...
AI summary The text presents survey questions to homeowners who participated in the New Home Construction program, asking whether they would have paid for energy efficiency measures and energy assessments if rebates and funding had not been available. It includes sample responses and asks participants to rate their willingness to pay on a scale from 0 to 10.
ve paid for the full cost, which is $600? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that you “Definitely Would Not Have Paid” and a 10 indicating that you “Definitely Would Have Paid.” 2015 2016 2017 Would Have Paid Cost to...
AI summary The text presents survey data on homeowner willingness to pay for energy efficiency improvements, asking respondents to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how likely they would have paid for the full cost of reaching a specific energy efficiency level in 2015, 2016, and 2017. It also references a program evaluation related to the New Residential Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia.
able. I will read you a few options. For each one, please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” 2016 2017 Actions Taken in Absence of NHC - Homeowners Sa...
AI summary The text presents survey data on homeowner actions related to energy efficiency and estimated costs of energy-efficient upgrades. It includes responses from 2016 and 2017, with mean scores and sample sizes for different scenarios and average upgrade costs.
22 8 13 Average $15,540 $18,000 $16,545 Don’t know excluded from calculations FR5. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your decision to build or buy a house with a high level of energy ef...
AI summary The text presents data on average values and homeowner responses to factors influencing decisions to build or buy energy-efficient homes, including expert advice, feedback on home plans, and program rebates, as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report.
know 1 - CI2. For the following statements, please indicate whether you agree or disagree. Impact of Previous ENS 2016 2017 Program Participation - Sample Don’t Sample Don’t Homeowners Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Size know Size know Beca...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the impact of previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs on homeowners' decisions regarding energy efficiency in new home construction. It highlights how prior program involvement influenced participants' actions, such as seeking reviews of home plans and considering cost-effective energy upgrades.
- - CI4. For the following statements, please indicate whether you agree or disagree. Impact of Previously Seen 2016 2017 ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials - Sample Don’t Sample Don’t Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Homeowners Size...
AI summary The text presents survey results from 2016 and 2017 regarding the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy efficiency promotional materials on homeowners' decisions related to new home construction and energy efficiency upgrades.
13 7 6 - your decision to build a house with a high level of energy efficiency Base: Respondents who previously saw ENS energy efficiency promotional materials Project No. 6138 19 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Eva...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of energy efficiency in new home construction, particularly in the context of the New Residential Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia. It references a survey assessing how important energy efficiency was in decision-making for equipment and measures included in new homes.
tremely important, how important, if at all, were the following when deciding what equipment or measures would be included in your new home through the New Home Construction Program? 2016 2017 Importance of Upgrades - Homeowners Sample Sam...
AI summary The text asks respondents about the importance of various factors in determining equipment and measures included in new homes through the New Home Construction Program, focusing on energy cost reduction, energy efficiency, home value, and cost considerations.
/Don’t recall and Refused excluded from calculations B1b. What other considerations, if any, were important in determining what equipment or measures would be included in your new home? Other Considerations That Were Important in Determini...
AI summary The text presents survey responses regarding factors influencing the inclusion of energy-efficient equipment and measures in new homes. Key considerations include recommendations from builders, longevity, functionality, energy efficiency, comfort, aesthetics, and cost, with 'none' being the most frequently cited reason.
efficiency equipment or measures that were recommended as part of the program? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means ‘not at all a barrier’ and 10 means ‘a major barrier’. 2016 2017 Barriers to implementation - Homeowners Samp...
AI summary The text presents survey data on barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures in new home construction in Nova Scotia. It highlights factors such as lack of money, information, and time, with responses collected in 2016 and 2017. The data is part of an evaluation of the 2017 DSM program.
with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2 No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION – NON PARTICIPANT BUILDERS] INTRODUCTION – PARTICIPANT BUILDERS (FROM SAMPLE) Hello, my name is _ and I am with Corporate Researc...
AI summary This text outlines an introduction script for a survey conducted by Corporate Research Associates on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia, targeting both participant and non-participant builders in the New Home Construction program. The script aims to gather feedback on energy efficiency services and residential new construction market practices.
OR DK OR REFUSED, THANK, TERMINATE, AND RECORD] 1. [ENTER NUMBER] 98. (Don’t know) [THANK, TERMINATE, AND RECORD] 99. (Refused) [THANK, TERMINATE, AND RECORD] VR3. Among the new houses that you have built so far in 2017 in Nova Scotia, how...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process related to the New Home Construction program under Efficiency Nova Scotia in 2017. It includes questions about the number of new homes built under the program and whether builders participated in it, with specific instructions for handling responses and determining participant status.
ASK THIS SECTION TO PARTICIPANT BUILDERS ONLY] Now, I would like to examine the influence of the New Home Construction program on your decision to build houses with a high level of energy efficiency. FR1. Without the New Home Construction...
AI summary The text asks participants in the New Home Construction program about their decision-making regarding energy efficiency in 2017, specifically whether the program influenced the number and efficiency level of houses they built.
e New Home Construction program if the program had NOT been in place? [ENTER NUMBER] [CAN’T BE HIGHER THAN VR3] DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) FR3. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means “Not at all important” and...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the New Home Construction program and its influence on building energy-efficient homes, as well as inquiries about heating systems used in homes built in 2017. The survey targets non-participating builders and asks about program importance and heating system installation practices.
) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) M0b. Of the homes you built in 2017, how many had [INSERT HEATING SYSTEM FROM M0a] installed? [ENTER NUMBER, PROBE FOR SPECIFIC NUMBER] Project No. 6138 29 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 201...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions related to residential energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the New Home Construction program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It asks about participation, the number of homes built in 2017 with specific heating systems, and energy efficiency levels achieved.
SARY: Either reaching an EnerGuide rating of 85 or higher and/or achieving ENERGY STAR certification or higher performance when modelled in Natural Resources Canada’s HOT2000 software. M5. [DO NOT ASK IF M3 = 0] What energy efficiency upgr...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency upgrades in new residential homes, specifically focusing on achieving an EnerGuide rating of 85 or higher and ENERGY STAR certification. It includes questions about the implementation of these upgrades and the likelihood of their implementation without participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s programs.
uses built in Nova Scotia under the New Home Construction program? [CHANGE ANSWER TO VR2 and/or VR3 BASED ON ANSWER FROM RESPONDENT] 1. [CHANGE VR2] 2. [CHANGE VR3] MP2. [DO NOT ASK IF VR2-VR3 = 0] Among the [VR2-VR3] house(s) you told me...
AI summary This section of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document asks respondents about the number of homes built without participating in the New Home Construction program and whether they meet Efficiency Nova Scotia’s energy efficiency standards. It also requests details on energy efficiency upgrades implemented in those homes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report MP5. [DO NOT ASK IF 98 OR 99 IN MP4 OR IF MP2=0] What is the likelihood that you would have implemented those upgrades if you had never participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s p...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s programs, specifically focusing on the likelihood of implementing energy upgrades without program involvement and reasons for not participating in the New Home Construction program. It also asks about decision-making for participation in the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report FR1. Without the New Home Construction program, its energy modelling service and rebate, and the energy labels it promotes, such as EnerGuide, ENERGY STAR® Canada and R2000, woul...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of the New Home Construction program on building energy-efficient homes in 2017, including a survey of participants on whether they would have built the same number of houses with the same level of energy efficiency without the program and its associated services.
at all important” and 10 means “Extremely important”, please rate the importance of the following in terms of your decision to build houses with a high level of energy efficiency. 2015 2016 2017 Importance of Factors in Influencing Decisio...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the importance of various factors influencing builders' decisions to construct energy-efficient homes, including energy modeling services, incentives, and promotional materials, with sample sizes and mean ratings provided for the years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
uation - Appendix Report M2. Has your firm ever participated in the New Home Construction program or Efficiency Nova Scotia’s former program for new houses known as Performance Plus? Participation in New Home Construction or Performance Pl...
AI summary The text asks about participation in the New Home Construction program and Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Performance Plus program, and explores the likelihood of implementing energy upgrades without program involvement or awareness of EnerGuide ratings.
of or participated in any of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s programs or heard of the EnerGuide rating? Please answer on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means “very unlikely” and 10 “very likely.” Likelihood of Implementation of Energy Efficiency M...
AI summary The text presents a survey question about the likelihood of implementing energy efficiency measures without awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs or the EnerGuide rating, with data from 2016 and 2017 for non-participant builders. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report related to a new residential program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Reasons for Not Participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Programs for Houses – 2016 2017 Non-participant Builders 15 15 Sample Size (#) (#) Rebate is not worth the effort - 7 The program is too complicated - 6 Rebate reduction/Change in i...
AI summary The text presents reasons why non-participant builders did not engage with Efficiency Nova Scotia’s programs for houses in 2016 and 2017. Common reasons include the rebate not being worth the effort, program complexity, and time constraints.
1 10% - - furnace) Base: Participants who built homes outside of program Don’t know/refused removed from calculation Project No. 6138 40 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report MP5. What is the...
AI summary This section of the document evaluates participant responses to the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, focusing on the likelihood of implementing energy efficiency measures without program participation and reasons for not taking part in the New Home Construction program. The data includes sample sizes and mean responses from participants over three years.
Reasons for Participating in Program – Participant Builders 2015 2016 2017 19 26 38 Sample Size (#) (%) (%) To reach/obtain the EnerGuide/ENERGY STAR/R2000 label/certification 1 - 39% To get rebates for upgrades that we were already planni...
AI summary The table presents reasons why participant builders engaged in energy efficiency programs from 2015 to 2017, with responses categorized by percentage. Key motivations include obtaining energy labels, receiving rebates, reducing energy costs, and improving marketability.
3% evaluated Interested in energy efficiency and renewable energy 2 12% - To get expert advice about what measures to install/how to make home 1 8% - more energy efficient To help the environment - 8% - To meet new building code requiremen...
AI summary The text discusses participant satisfaction with the New Home Construction program, highlighting reasons for participation such as energy efficiency, renewable energy, and meeting building code requirements. It also includes a satisfaction rating scale from 1 to 10.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report V3. [ASK IF V2= 2, 98, 99] Did you take part in the decisions regarding the energy-efficient features to be included in your home energy model to reach the Passive House level of...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Passive House pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on participant involvement in energy-efficient home design and free-ridership. It also references a project number, 6138, and an appendix report from the 2017 DSM Evaluation.
t is the likelihood that you would have built or bought a standard house, designed to code, instead of a Passive House? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused FR4. Thinking of all the energy-efficient features you decided to incorporate int...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about energy-efficient home features, the cost of upgrades, and the influence of rebates on decisions to build or buy a Passive House. It is part of an evaluation of a residential energy efficiency program.
ACCEPT A RANGE Factor Responses a. The rebate offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused b. Expert information or advice provided by the _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Passive House-certified consultant...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs, including questions about rebates, expert advice, home energy models, and Passive House certification. It includes response options and conditional questions for participants.
3 No - Don’t know 1 FR2a. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid you $10,000 for reaching the Passive House level of energy efficiency in your new house. If you had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid for the full...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer willingness to pay for energy efficiency improvements, specifically focusing on the Passive House level of energy efficiency and the impact of the Passive House pilot program. Respondents are asked to rate their likelihood of taking certain actions if the pilot had not been available.
available. I will read you a few options. For each one, please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” 2017 Actions Taken in Absence of Passive House Pilot...
AI summary The text presents survey data on actions taken by individuals in the absence of a Passive House pilot program and estimates of the cost of energy-efficient upgrades. Respondents were asked to rate the likelihood of various actions on a scale from 0 to 10 and to estimate the cost of upgrades before rebates.
3 Average $21,667 Don’t know excluded from calculations FR5. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your decision to build or buy a Passive House. Using a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means “N...
AI summary The text presents survey results regarding the influence of various factors on decisions to build or buy a Passive House. It includes average ratings for the influence of rebate programs, expert advice, home energy model reviews, promotional materials, and previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs.
energy efficient features that were identified in the review FR1 = 0% of your home plans? PA2 Score: FR1 FR5. Level of influence of three program factors (Scale 0 to 10) FR5 = MAX(a; b; c) PA3 Score: (10 − FR5) x 10% IF FR1a = 100% AND FR2...
AI summary The text discusses a scoring system related to energy-efficient features in home plans, including factors like free-ridership and program influence, with calculations involving percentages and mean values.
MEAN VALUE OF: Free-Ridership (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [Your previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] was a major factor in your decision to implement energy efficiency upgra...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of free-ridership in the context of energy efficiency programs, particularly focusing on the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials and previous participation in programs. It includes a formula for revising free-ridership based on customer responses to specific questions about their decision-making process.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report Passive House FR2. If you had not received the rebate from ENS, would you have paid FR2 = Answer x 10% the full cost to reach this level of energy efficiency? (Scale 0 to 10) IF...
AI summary The document presents survey questions related to the Passive House pilot program, assessing participants' willingness to pay for energy efficiency and their likelihood of building or purchasing a Passive House without the rebate or pilot program.
include to your home design all the energy-efficient features IF No OR DK OR REF: that were identified in your home energy model? FR1 = 0% FR1a. [IF FR1=1] I just want to make sure I understand - Before you IF Yes: FR1 = 100% decided to pa...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to energy-efficient home design and program factors, with scoring and consistency checks for data collection. It involves assessing participation in the Passive House pilot and evaluating program influence and free-ridership.
your firm built so far in 2017 in Nova Total number of houses: Scotia? If you built semi-detached units in 2017 in Nova Scotia, please Ʃ VR2 count each as two units. VR3. Among the new houses that you have built so far in 2017 in Nova Numb...
AI summary The text collects data on the number of houses built in 2017 in Nova Scotia, including participation in the NHC program and energy efficiency levels. It includes questions about participation in the New Home Construction program and the number of non-participating houses meeting energy efficiency standards.
ld have reached the energy efficiency level required by ENS’s required by NHC: NHC program? Ʃ MP2 OR Ʃ M3 IF VR4 = 1: % of non-participating houses who would have reached the energy %N-PEE = ƩMP2 / Ʃ(VR2-VR3) efficiency level required by N...
AI summary The text outlines a method for calculating spillover effects from energy efficiency programs, including metrics such as participation rates, attribution levels, and validation of measures. It references ENS and NHC programs and considers factors like likelihood of implementation and energy efficiency upgrades.
17 in Nova Scotia? Final Spillover = (Total # of N-P Houses) x %N-PEE x %Attrib x %Elect (Total # of Participating Houses) Project No. 6138 59 160 Saint-Paul Street, Suite 200, Quebec City, QC, G1K 3W1, Canada Tel.: 1 (418) 692-2592 Fax: 1...
AI summary This document is the final report of the 2017 Efficient Product Rebates Program evaluation conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines the program's performance, including metrics such as demand savings factor and energy savings factor, and provides an analysis of the program's impact on energy efficiency.
energy performance. It is a measure of the efficiency of the building only and does not take into account occupant EnerGuide rating behaviour. It shows how energy efficient the home is through modelled heat losses of the home, based on sev...
AI summary The text defines several energy efficiency and environmental metrics, including EnerGuide ratings, effective useful life, equipment life, and equivalent CO2. These metrics are used to assess building energy performance, measure the lifespan of energy-saving measures, and quantify the warming effects of greenhouse gases.
Gross and net savings calculated by the Evaluator using the parameters (unitary savings values, installation rates, interactive effects, net-to-gross Evaluated savings ratio, etc.) validated or measured during the evaluation process. Unles...
AI summary The text outlines key terms and concepts related to energy efficiency program evaluation, including gross and net savings, free-ridership, induced consumption, and interactive effects. It emphasizes the importance of evaluation plans and the first-year savings metric in assessing program effectiveness.
d by a program after participating in it once, without participating in the program a second time. The proportion of incentivized products that are installed and operating. This rate is usually applied to programs through which rebates are...
AI summary This text defines several key terms related to energy efficiency programs and their measurement, including in-service rate, lifetime energy savings, line loss factor, margin of error, market effects, net energy savings, and net-to-gross ratio. These terms are used to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of energy efficiency initiatives.
Errors arising during the course of all survey activities other than sampling. Non-sampling error Non-sampling errors tend to lead to bias in measurements and are very difficult to quantify. Peak coincidence The percentage of measure deman...
AI summary The text defines various terms related to energy efficiency programs, including non-sampling errors, peak coincidence factor, precision, random sampling error, sample size, secondary market impacts, tracked savings, and unitary savings. These terms are relevant to the evaluation and measurement of energy savings in efficiency initiatives.
stributors across the province of Nova Scotia. 1 Throughout this report, energy savings always refer to first-year energy savings rather than lifetime energy savings, unless specified otherwise. Efficient Product Rebates Program xi Efficie...
AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates Program (BER) under Efficiency Nova Scotia achieved significant energy savings in 2017, exceeding its targets with 46.583 GWh in net electricity savings and 7.286 MW in net peak demand savings. These savings avoided 30,423 tonnes of CO2 eq in greenhouse gas emissions.
Peak Demand Savings (MW) 2011 results include the sum of the savings for Mail-in Rebates from BER and Instant Rebates from Smart Lighting Choices. Efficient Product Rebates Program xii Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary In 2017, the BER Mail-in program saw 288 projects implemented by 213 participants, with high satisfaction ratings averaging 9.0 out of 10. Participants were satisfied with interactions, rebate amounts, and the efficiency of the process, showing continued improvement since 2015.
he rebate. BER Mail-in succeeded in maintaining high satisfaction scores with all these service aspects for a second year in a row, indicating sustained improvement in Mail-in satisfaction since 2015. The results of the site visits and pro...
AI summary The BER Mail-in program maintained high satisfaction scores, with only minor adjustments needed for tracked energy savings. The NTGR was set at 0.86 based on free-ridership and spillover effects. For BER Instant Rebates, there was a 7% increase in rebated products sold in 2017, and overall satisfaction remained consistent with previous years.
d an overall positive opinion (ratings of 8 or higher), one distributor offered a moderate opinion (rating of 7) and three distributors were critical of BER Instant Rebates (ratings of 5 or lower). Efficient Product Rebates Program xiii Ef...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights dissatisfaction with the Efficient Product Rebates Program, particularly due to rebates being directed to contractors rather than end users. However, satisfaction with Efficiency Nova Scotia's support and communication is high, with an average satisfaction level of 8.3.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report BER Market Evolution Findings As part of the 2017 evaluation, the Evaluator conducted a market analysis of the LED product market in the BNI sector in Nova Scotia. The Evaluator analyzed se...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia highlights the significant growth in LED technology adoption in the BNI sector, with market share increasing from 0% in 2010 to 54% in 2016. Prices have declined, and LEDs are widely available. Upcoming regulations will further increase efficiency requirements, with LEDs being the most efficient option available.
s available. With this information, the Evaluator came to the conclusion that LEDs continue to be in a growth phase, but are approaching maturity as the BNI sector increasingly adopts these products. BER Recommendations Overall, the Evalua...
AI summary The Evaluator concludes that the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program generated significant savings, with stable participation in BER Mail-in and increased sales and savings in BER Instant Rebates. Recommendations are provided to optimize the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report INTRODUCTION Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is a franchise held by EfficiencyOne2 and is responsible for helping Nova Scotians improve the energy efficiency of their homes and workplaces. ENS...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is responsible for delivering energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, funded by Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia. Econoler was commissioned to evaluate ENS’s 2017 demand-side management (DSM) program portfolio and assess the impact of energy efficiency codes and standards in Nova Scotia.
fficiency codes and standards introduced in Nova Scotia. To carry out this assignment, Econoler collaborated with Research Into Action, Equilibrium Engineering and Corporate Research Associates (CRA). Econoler served as team leader in the...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, conducted by Econoler and its partners. The evaluation included impact assessments, process evaluations, and data collection activities. The 2017 evaluation involved reduced evaluation activities for certain programs, such as Instant Rebates.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement C C R Product Rebates Program Instant Savings C C R R Home Energy Assessment C C C C Existing Residential Green Heat C C C C C Program Efficient Product Installation C C C C New Residential Progra...
AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business rebate initiatives, home energy assessments, and custom incentive programs. It highlights the focus on efficient product installation, strategic energy management, and direct installation services for small businesses.
is applied universally to any eligible participant. In 2017, BER was expanded to include a new measure category, namely pool equipment. The measures currently offered are divided into 13 categories: › Agriculture › IT & Datacenters › Light...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program was expanded in 2017 to include pool equipment. The program offers rebates through mail-in or instant rebate services, with the latter aiming to increase participation and ease of access. Distributors play a key role in promoting and supporting the program.
Rx Screening Tool,3 as were the values used for heat pump full load hours. Additionally, new procedures for baseline wattages in new construction projects and in Instant Rebates have been established. Also, ENS has improved the BER Mail-in...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has updated procedures for baseline wattages in new construction projects and Instant Rebates. Additionally, ENS improved the BER Mail-in internal review process and implemented a new M&V protocol to enhance accuracy in tracked savings. Market analyses on LED lighting were conducted as part of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
rket analyses. These analyses focus on light-emitting diode (LED) lighting and are presented in a new section of this report entitled BER Market Evolution. 1.3 Participation History BER Mail-in In 2017, a total of 288 BER Mail-in projects...
AI summary The report discusses the participation history of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Mail-in program from 2011 to 2017, highlighting a steady participation level between 2016 and 2017, a decrease from 2013 to 2015, and an increase in gross savings per participant in 2017 compared to 2016.
ke random sampling errors into account; they do not reflect non-sampling errors or biases such as data entry errors, inaccurate responses from respondents or the inability to contact certain people. Business Energy Rebates 10 Efficient Pro...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses on-site visits conducted to validate energy efficiency measures and assess spillover effects, as well as a review of effective useful life values used in calculating energy savings. The report includes a participant survey and references technical reference manuals.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Interviews with Distributors In November 2017, CRA conducted eight interviews with participating distributors for BER Instant Rebates. These interviews were mainly used to establish free-ri...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia conducted interviews with distributors in 2017 to assess the BER Instant Rebates program, focusing on free-ridership and satisfaction. Savings and effective useful life (EUL) values were reviewed, with the 2017 evaluation scope defined as 'reduced' due to unchanged assumptions from the 2016 evaluation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Instant Rebates Influence Most distributors continue to believe that BER Instant Rebates influenced their decisions as to the number of LED lamps and fixture models they carry. For the most...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses how BER Instant Rebates influence distributors' decisions on LED lamp and fixture models they carry, with most distributors believing the rebates are highly influential. However, the rebates have minimal impact on staff knowledge, with manufacturers being the primary source of training.
motivating staff to stay knowledgeable about the technology to better serve consumers. These two distributors also mentioned that ENS does not directly train store staff about LED lamps and fixtures. Distributors believed that BER Instant...
AI summary Distributors believe that BER Instant Rebates have a moderate to minimal influence on consumer purchase behaviors for LED products, except for linear and downlight fixtures. However, the service significantly influences the types of LED lamps and fixtures offered in-store, particularly those with DLC or ENERGY STAR certifications.
647 Multi-family Tracked 2,208 213 Adjusted 2,280 228 The most common adjustment made to the HVAC category was revising the heating capacity value at - 15 °C to estimate peak demand savings. In the tracking sheet, three measures were ident...
AI summary Adjustments were made to HVAC measures, particularly heat pumps, to correct heating capacity values and improve accuracy in peak demand savings calculations. These changes included aligning with NEEP specifications and correcting unit conversion factors for better performance evaluation.
g Tool to prevent future errors. Specifically, the Evaluator suggests using either imperial units with the additional conversion factor of 3.412, or using metric capacity values combined with the COP. Overall, adjustments were limited and...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses energy savings adjustments for commercial lighting measures in 2017, noting updates to annual HOUs, baseline wattage values, and PCF as common causes of adjustments. Thirty-four lighting projects were evaluated, with overall tracked quantities matching on-site findings.
e and did not require the removal of any major outliers from the sample. The overall adjustment ratio applied to the tracked energy savings and peak demand savings was 0.927 and 0.955 respectively. 11 Duke Energy Progress, Energy Efficienc...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, including site visits to assess commercial refrigeration measures. Adjustments were made to energy savings calculations based on findings during the evaluation process.
it was found that the load connected to the economizer was three times higher. Also, the HOU was doubled for another measure, which led to a 15 percent increase in the energy savings of this project. For one other project, refrigerated str...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency projects, including adjustments to variables like interactive effects factors and quantities. It mentions refrigerated strip curtains and motor and variable frequency drive measures, referencing the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's Technical Reference Manual for calculation methodologies. Adjustments were made to energy and peak demand savings for reviewed projects.
nts were required for 13 measures which affected each project. 12 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, State of Pennsylvania Technical Reference Manual – June 2016, Effective January 1, 2017. Business Energy Rebates 21 Efficient Product...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses revisions to energy savings factors (ESVG) and peak demand savings factors (DSVG) for three measures. Adjustments were made after site visits revealed that some exhaust fans were incorrectly classified as return fans, leading to significant changes in energy savings calculations.
Number of Measures Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Overall Extrapolated Margin of Overall Extrapolated Margin of Measure Category Total Sample Adjustment Adjustment Error Adjustment Ratio Adjustment Ratio Error Ratio Ratio HVAC 110 45 0...
AI summary The text presents a table summarizing energy savings and peak demand savings across various measure categories, including HVAC, commercial lighting, and refrigeration. It includes metrics such as energy savings ratios, extrapolated adjustments, and margins of error for each category.
1.066 1.066 1.066 1.066 Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.364 1.835 0.172 0.037 0.002 0.020 Business Energy Rebates 33 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Revised Net Energy a...
AI summary The text presents data on net peak demand savings at the generator level and references the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It includes categories such as kitchen, water heating, and solar, with numerical values related to energy savings.
aluation Report Table 13: Recommended Values for Linear LED Fixtures Subcategory Lumen Output (lm) Baseline Wattage (W) Hours of Use 1,500 – 3,500 61.00 1 x 4 Luminaires 4,410 ≥ 3,500 83.25 1,500 – 4,500 61.00 2 x 2 Luminaires & Retrofit K...
AI summary The document presents a table with recommended values for linear LED fixtures, including lumen output, baseline wattage, and hours of use. It notes that efficient wattage is not included as actual wattage is used for all products in BER Instant Rebates.
ient wattage is not included in this table since the actual wattage of each product is used, which is the case for all products in BER Instant Rebates. Revised Savings Baseline and Efficient Wattage The Evaluator reviewed each category and...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from linear LED lamps in the Efficient Product Rebates Program. It reviews baseline and efficient wattage, hours of use, and overall adjustment ratios for energy and peak demand savings.
ps. Table 14 below lists the variables recommended in the 2016 evaluation report for the savings calculations in this category. Table 14: Recommended Values for Linear LED Lamps Subcategory Baseline Wattage (W) HOU 4-foot Replacement Lamps...
AI summary The document discusses the revision of efficient wattage values for linear LED lamps based on discrepancies found between tracked wattages and DLC listings. This adjustment impacts a large number of data entries and lamps.
nd efficient wattage values for one product resulted in an overall adjustment ratio of 1.043 for energy savings and 1.043 for peak demand savings. LED Downlight Fixtures Recommended Savings LED downlight fixtures category includes recessed...
AI summary The text discusses recommended wattage values and annual hours of use for LED downlight fixtures, including different subcategories and their baseline technologies. It mentions an adjustment ratio of 1.043 for energy and peak demand savings.
4,410 Wall Sconces, LED Wall Sconce Retrofit ≥ 1,490 72 4,410 Revised Savings Baseline and Efficient Wattage The Evaluator reviewed the baseline wattage values as per Table 18 above. The baseline wattage required corrections for 411 data e...
AI summary The document discusses corrections made to baseline wattage values for LED wall sconces, leading to an overall adjustment ratio of 0.998 for energy savings and 1.008 for peak demand savings. The 2017 HOU value was applied correctly to most products, with minor adjustments for the remaining cases.
5,000 95 95 95.0 4,380 ≥ 5,000 and < 15,000 295 250 272.5 4,380 The architectural flood and spot luminaires subcategory is divided into six ranges according to the baseline lamp technology. The typical lumen output of these fixtures is gro...
AI summary The text discusses the architectural flood and spot luminaires subcategory, divided into ranges based on baseline lamp technology. It references a table outlining recommended values for efficient LED fixtures, with annual hours of use set at 4,380 based on a 12-hour daily usage assumption for outdoor lighting.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The interactive effects for BER Instant Rebates are based on the building types and associated heating and cooling systems verified during the SBES and BER Mail-in lighting project on-site...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the interactive effects for BER Instant Rebates, noting that the average peak demand and energy savings factors from 2016 were used in 2017 due to missing information and changes in product eligibility. The report highlights that the proportion of BER Mail-in measures not eligible for Instant Rebates has increased to 61%.
ed based on the findings of the literature review. When establishing the EUL for a given measure, the Evaluator considered the most common values found in TRMs, evaluation reports or relevant studies. For lighting measures, the Evaluator a...
AI summary The Evaluator determined the Effective Useful Life (EUL) for lighting measures by consulting TRMs, evaluation reports, and product specification sheets. The EUL was calculated by dividing the rated life of the product by the annual HOU and adjusted for baseline increases. This adjustment affected LED downlight fixtures under the BER Instant Rebates program.
13.6 5.7 5.7 Large LED Reflector Lamp - PAR, BR, R 30/30L Large LED Reflector Lamp - PAR, BR, R 38/40 LED Recessed 50,000 4,410 14.2 11.3 8.3 LED Downlight Fixtures LED Ceiling Mount, LED Surface Mount, LED Solid State Retrofit, LED Insepa...
AI summary The text lists various lighting and pump products with their respective quantities, costs, and performance metrics. It includes details on LED fixtures, occupancy sensors, and variable speed pumps, highlighting energy efficiency and cost considerations.
eflector lamps, as well as LED downlight fixtures (which replace fixtures including general-use lamps). This analysis was based on current and projected Canadian regulations for general service lamps. For general-service lamps, the current...
AI summary This text discusses the regulation of general-service lamps, including the transition from incandescent halogen lamps to more efficient CFL and LED lamps. It outlines the impact of regulatory changes, such as the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) and updates to Canada’s Energy Efficiency Regulations, on baseline efficiency requirements and the equivalent useful life (EUL) of various lighting products.
o determine lifetime energy savings. ∆ 7 ∆ 4.3 ∆ Table 26: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps CFL Equivalent Baseline Halogen Baseline Typical American Legislation22 Replaced Lamp 7 years (2017-2023)...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of baseline evolution for LED reflector lamps and A-type lamps over their effective useful life, referencing equivalent EUL calculations and displaced wattage based on 2017 BER Instant Rebates.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Directional & Architectural Occupancy Total for All Product Category Pumps LED Fixtures Sensors Products Tracking Sheet Number of Units 709 5,980 199 315,867...
AI summary This document provides a tracking sheet for the Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates, detailing energy savings across different product categories, including LED fixtures, occupancy sensors, and pumps. It includes metrics such as energy savings in GWh, adjustment ratios, in-service rates, and lifetime energy savings.
ible NTGR estimate.27 The evaluation targets the following four specific products: › LED linear fixtures › LED downlight fixtures › LED linear lamps › LED general-use and decorative lamps These product categories represent 75 percent of al...
AI summary The evaluation focuses on four LED product categories that account for 75% of energy savings from BER Instant Rebates. These products were selected due to their high sales volume and potential for free-ridership. Interviews with distributors and end-users were conducted to assess the influence of the service on market behavior and purchasing decisions.
e free-ridership level of LED linear lamps was evaluated for the first time in 2017. The overall free-ridership level of 38 percent points to the rapid adoption of the product and its declining price. The answers provided by distributors t...
AI summary The free-ridership level for LED linear lamps was evaluated at 38%, indicating rapid adoption due to declining prices and increased awareness. Distributors and end users noted the rebate's influence on purchases, but also acknowledged the service's role in promoting DLC and ENERGY STAR certified products. The NTGR is calculated as 1 minus the free-ridership percentage.
Net energy savings were first calculated separately for each product category because the NTGR differed from one product category to another. Table 31 below presents the details of these calculations. Overall, the total net energy and peak...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of net energy and peak demand savings from the Efficient Product Rebates Program, resulting in 30.805 GWh of energy savings and 4.823 MW of peak demand savings. Using a 9.9-year effective useful life and a 2016 Nova Scotia-specific GHG factor, the net energy savings are estimated to have avoided 20,119 tonnes of CO2 eq.
1.066 1.066 1.066 1.066 Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.494 0.466 0.219 0.453 1.701 1.060 Business Energy Rebates 59 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Evaluated Net Energy...
AI summary This section presents data on net peak demand savings at the generator level and discusses the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, focusing on evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates.
ENS Tracked Savings 10.328 MW 10.328 MW 0.78 8.056 MW Evaluation Results 10.328 MW 6.432 MW 0.75 4.823 MW Evaluated gross energy savings were 7 percent below tracked savings due to downward adjustments made to unitary savings in some of th...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) indicates that evaluated energy savings were 7% lower than tracked savings due to downward adjustments in unitary savings for BER Instant Rebates, particularly in LED products. Net energy savings were 11% below tracked savings, attributed to a decrease in the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) and higher free-ridership. Net peak demand savings were 40% below tracked savings, influenced by a drop in the Power Conversion Factor (PCF).
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 7 BER MARKET EVOLUTION ENS has been active in the LED market of the business, non-profit, and institutional (BNI) sector through BER since 2010. The 2016 Evaluation of BER found an increase...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has been promoting LED adoption in the BNI sector through BER since 2010. The 2016 evaluation found declining market barriers and increasing LED adoption, recommending continued monitoring. This section examines market indicators like market share, retail prices, and participation in BER Instant Rebates to assess ongoing market evolution.
tant Rebates since sales quantities and prices are documented with a level of detail that is not available for BER Mail-in lighting category measures. Market Shares of Lighting Technologies The BNI lighting market is comprised of six main...
AI summary The text discusses the growth of LED lighting technology in the commercial and industrial sectors of the Atlantic region between 2010 and 2016, with LEDs increasing from no sales to 65% of total sales, while fluorescents and HID lighting saw significant declines in market share.
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A-Line Decorative Reflectors Linear Downlight Retrofit Fixtures Other Source: Electro-Federation Canada, Lamp Data - Consumer Channel and C&I Channel 2004–2016, March 2017. BER Instant Rebates Rebated Units The tot...
AI summary The text provides data on the number of LED lamps and fixtures incented by the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Instant Rebates program from 2012 to 2017, highlighting a significant increase in rebated units from 2015 to 2017 and the introduction of Linear LED lamps in 2014.
100,000 50,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LED Downlight Fixtures LED Linear Fixtures LED General-use/Decorative LED Linear Lamps LED Reflector Lamps Other LED Products 7.1.3 BER Participating Distributors BER Instant Rebates collabora...
AI summary The document discusses the participation of distributors in the BER Instant Rebates program, highlighting the number of participating distributors and their locations. It also outlines the availability of LED products and the evolution of LED prices in Nova Scotia from 2012 to 2017, noting that data before 2015 should be used with caution due to less detailed product descriptions.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Codes and Standards The ultimate indicator of market transformation is the adoption of more stringent codes and standards. Currently, general-service lamps31 are required to meet an efficie...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the adoption of energy efficiency codes and standards, particularly for general-service lamps. It notes that current standards require lamps to meet the efficiency of halogen incandescent bulbs and highlights that the U.S. is expected to enforce stricter standards by 2020, while Canada is still considering updates. The report outlines potential impacts of future regulations on the market dominance of CFLs and LED lamps.
and it is possible that the price difference becomes too low (or even that the price of LED lamps falls below that of CFLs) for CFLs to remain the mainstream option for general-use lighting. In summary, the state of energy efficiency light...
AI summary The text discusses the potential for LED lamps to become the least efficient lighting option within five to ten years, despite currently being more efficient than CFLs. It also references energy efficiency regulations and a rebate program related to energy efficiency initiatives.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Other lamp and fixture types are also affected by Canadian energy efficiency regulations. Amendment 13 has introduced new requirements for the efficiency of fluorescent linear lamp ballasts...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the impact of Canadian energy efficiency regulations on lighting products, noting that while amendments are evolving, they do not significantly improve efficiency levels. The report also evaluates free-ridership levels in the LED BNI market in Nova Scotia.
aluation Results The Evaluator looked at the unitary savings values and free-ridership levels to gain insights into the evolution of the LED BNI market in Nova Scotia. Free-ridership Levels For BER Instant Rebates, free-ridership correspon...
AI summary The evaluation analyzed free-ridership levels for LED products in the BER Instant Rebates program, noting an increase over time, with levels ranging between 32 and 38 percent in 2017. Distributors indicated that rebates have enhanced the appeal of LED technology, though to a lesser extent than previously.
es rather than retrofits. The incremental cost for an LED fixture or lamp is much less if a new standard fixture needs to be purchased, thus making the payback period more attractive for new fixtures. 7.3 Market Evolution Summary In their...
AI summary The text discusses the cost-effectiveness of LED fixtures compared to retrofits and mentions market transformation program planning factors identified by Rosenburg and Hoefgen (2009). It highlights considerations for program support based on market changes.
f changes observed in the market.35 Table 37: Analysis of Key Factors in Program Planning Factor Results Market share of LEDs for BNI LED shipments targeted at the commercial and industrial sector in Atlantic sector Canada have steadily in...
AI summary The text discusses the increasing market share of LED lighting in the BNI sector, declining prices, and widespread availability of LED products in Nova Scotia. It also mentions regulatory amendments related to energy performance standards for lighting and the absence of more efficient substitutes for LEDs.
minimum energy performance requirements for MH ballasts. Market readiness of more No substitute more efficient than LEDs has come to the forefront. efficient substitute technology Assessing the above factors demonstrates that barriers to L...
AI summary The text discusses the declining barriers to LED adoption in the BNI sector, noting increased market share, availability, and price reductions. It also mentions the growth phase of LEDs and the increasing free-ridership levels as adoption rises.
ecrease in the participation level of Mail-in was observed in 2017, the gross savings per participant were at the third highest level since 2011. Participants expressed high satisfaction with Mail-in. Since BER transitioned in 2015 toward...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program saw a decrease in Mail-in participation in 2017, but participants remained highly satisfied. LED products now dominate savings due to the program's focus on them since 2015. However, their impact on LED sales has diminished as market barriers decreased and prices dropped. The Evaluator recommends monitoring market indicators and diversifying Mail-in projects to include more non-lighting initiatives.
of market transformation. The Evaluator also suggests looking for opportunities to diversify the portfolio of projects completed through Mail-in to increase the proportion of non-lighting projects. Efficient Product Rebates Program 72 Effi...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Product Rebates Program (BER) under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It highlights recommendations, survey questionnaires, sampling methodologies, and algorithms related to free-ridership and internal spillover calculations.
ur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. to identify when some product categories should be removed from the service due to a high level of market transformation. 2. Identify opportunities to diversify the portfolio of projects completed through...
AI summary The text discusses the need to remove certain product categories from the BER Mail-In service due to high market transformation, and the importance of diversifying the portfolio to maintain savings. It highlights the dominance of lighting projects in BER Mail-In and the risks posed by the increasing popularity of LED lighting.
reviewing applications for return and exhaust measures and identifying if projects achieve savings from VFDs through controls or schedule changes. Impact Evaluation 6. Six commercial kitchen projects were reviewed for a total of 16 measure...
AI summary The text discusses the review of commercial kitchen projects and the need for adjustments in energy savings calculations, particularly concerning VFDs and operational hours. It also mentions a mail-in participant survey for BER, highlighting the importance of stakeholder engagement in energy efficiency programs.
BER: MAIL-IN PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2 No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] Introduction Hello, my name is _ and I am calling from Corporate Res...
AI summary This document is a mail-in participant survey questionnaire for Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Business Energy Rebates Program. It aims to gather feedback from participants to evaluate and improve the program. The survey includes verification questions and checks for the most knowledgeable person in the organization regarding the program.
. Are you the person in your organization who is most knowledgeable about your recent experience with the Business Energy Rebates Program? 1 Yes (IF YES GO TO V4) 2 No Project No. 6138 3 Efficient Product Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia 201...
AI summary The text is part of a survey related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, seeking the most knowledgeable individual in an organization regarding their experience with the program. It includes questions about participation, application details, and contact information for follow-up.
to implement energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures before you heard about the Business Energy Rebates Program? 1 Yes 2 No 8 (Don’t know) 9 (Refused) FR1a. IF FR1= YES, THEN ASK: I just want to make sure I understand - Before you dec...
AI summary The text outlines a series of survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, focusing on whether participants had already decided to implement energy-efficient measures before the program, their awareness of rebate-eligible products, and how the absence of the program would have affected their decisions.
that had a payback period longer than your standard payback time period ? CODE ONLY ONE 1 Yes 2 No 8 (Don’t know) 9 (Refused) Cross-Influence [CI Series] READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUENCES CI1. Before participating...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to participation in the Business Energy Rebates program and previous involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. It explores whether prior participation influenced decisions to implement energy-efficient measures and whether it prompted further examination of energy efficiency options.
asked a contractor or a technical staff member to examine the energy efficiency options for the facility. 1 Agree 2 Disagree 98 (Don’t know) 99 (Refused) CI2c. [IF CI1=1] Because of your company’s previous participation in an Efficiency No...
AI summary The text discusses customer experiences with Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, including participation in energy efficiency initiatives and the influence of promotional materials on decision-making regarding energy-efficient measures.
were a major factor in your company’s decision to implement energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures. 1 Agree 2 Disagree 98 (Don’t know) 99 (Refused) CI4b. [IF CI3=1] The energy-efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficienc...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy-efficiency promotional materials on company representatives' decisions to implement energy-efficient measures and evaluate their cost-effectiveness. It also references the Business Energy Rebates program and a satisfaction survey.
long to fill out) 2 (Took too long/Time delay in processing) 3 (Communication problems) 96 (Other: _) 98 (Don’t know) 99 (Refused) Project No. 6138 11 Efficient Product Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report [...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to customer experiences with the Efficient Product Rebates program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on barriers such as communication issues, rebate amounts, and processing times. It also includes a section for identifying problems encountered with energy efficiency measures under the Business Energy Rebates program.
y measures you implemented as part of the Business Energy Rebates program? 1 Yes 2 No (SKIP TO B5) 98 (Don’t know) (SKIP TO B5) 99 (Refused) (SKIP TO B5) Project No. 6138 12 Efficient Product Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluat...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates program, asking about implementation problems, resolution of those problems, and suggestions for improving the program. The questions are structured with response options and probes for additional input.
Motivations Most Most Most Second Most Second Important Important Important Important Important Important Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Motivation Sample Size 74 74 70 70 70 70 Save on energy 61% 19% 70% 9% 53% 26%...
AI summary The text presents survey results on customer motivations for participating in energy efficiency programs, with saving on energy costs and bills being the most important motivation, followed by taking advantage of program rebates and updating equipment.
- - - - 7% Others 8% 5% 3% 3% 3% 9% None/No other reason - 4% - 7% - 9% Don’t know - 3% - - - - Wording change in 2016 (OLD WORDING: What was the single most important reason your company or organization chose to participate in the Busines...
AI summary The text includes a table and a survey question related to the Business Energy Rebates program, asking participants if they had already decided to implement energy-efficient measures before learning about the program.
I understand - Before you decided to participate in the Business Energy Rebate Program, you had already made the decision to implement energy efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures? Already Made Decision to Implement Energy Efficient 2015 2...
AI summary The text presents survey data on participation in the Business Energy Rebate Program, showing the percentage of organizations that had already decided to implement energy-efficient measures before receiving rebates and whether they would have paid the full cost of the measures without the rebate.
e. I will read you a few options. For each one, please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” 2017 Actions Taken in Absence of Program Component Sample Me...
AI summary The text presents survey results assessing the likelihood of businesses implementing energy-efficient measures in the absence of a program component, with responses on a scale from 0 to 10. The mean scores indicate a moderate likelihood of actions such as installing the same quantity of lighting products or purchasing the same model, but lower likelihood of delaying implementation by at least one year.
excluded from calculations Base: Respondents who would have likely paid full cost of the energy-efficient measure [IF FR2≥5] Results from 2016 are not presented due to wording changes in 2017 FR4. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means...
AI summary The text presents survey results on the influence of various factors in implementing energy-efficient measures, including program rebates, on-site energy manager assistance, and information from program representatives. The data is collected in 2016 and 2017, with mean scores indicating the level of influence on decision-making.
ting the measure Information received by a program representative 67 5.8 64 5.7 Don’t know/Refused excluded from calculations Project No. 6138 18 Efficient Product Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report FR5a....
AI summary The text discusses the use of payback period thresholds by companies in deciding whether to implement energy efficiency measures. In 2016 and 2017, 53% of respondents indicated they use a payback period threshold, while 46% and 39% respectively do not. The data highlights the importance of payback period in energy efficiency decision-making.
1% 9% FR5aa. What is the maximum payback period acceptable in order to move forward with energy efficient upgrades? Maximum Payback Period 2016 2017 Sample Size 37 37 .25 years 3% 5% 1 year - 3% 1.5 years 3% - 2 years 19% 11% 3 years 30% 3...
AI summary The data shows the distribution of acceptable maximum payback periods for energy efficient upgrades in 2016 and 2017. The mean payback period increased from 3.6 years in 2016 to 4.5 years in 2017, with the majority of respondents accepting a 3-year payback period.
16% 19% FR6. Which of the following, if any, does your company have in place for the facility where the measures were implemented as part of the BER Program? Processes in Place in Facilities Where 2016 2017 Measures Were Implemented Sample...
AI summary The text asks about energy efficiency policies and practices in facilities where BER Program measures were implemented, including the presence of specific energy efficiency policies, personnel responsible for energy management, and defined energy-saving goals. It also inquires about the implementation of energy efficiency projects with payback periods longer than standard.
67% 47% 52% FR7. Has your company ever implemented energy efficiency projects that had a payback period longer than your standard payback time period? Implemented an Energy Efficiency Project with a Longer Payback Period 2016 2017 Sample S...
AI summary The text discusses participation in energy efficiency programs, including the Business Energy Rebates program and Efficiency Nova Scotia initiatives. It references a survey on energy efficiency projects with longer payback periods and includes data from 2016 and 2017. The document is part of an evaluation report for a 2017 DSM program.
I1. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program in [DATE], had your organization at any time in the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs? Previous Participation in Another ENS Program Compo...
AI summary The text discusses survey results about previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs and its influence on implementing energy-efficient measures. It highlights that a majority of respondents agreed that previous participation in ENS programs was a significant factor in their decision-making process.
what was learned by participating in the program, a company representative asked a contractor or a technical staff member to examine the energy efficiency options for the facility. Impact of Previous ENS Program Component Participation 201...
AI summary This text discusses the impact of previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs on company representatives' decision-making regarding energy efficiency measures. It highlights that a significant majority of participants agreed that their prior experience influenced their evaluation of cost-effective measures.
n the program, a company representative took into account the cost-effectiveness of energy efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures when evaluating different options for the facility. Impact of Previous ENS Program Component Participation 201...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on a company's decision to implement energy-efficient measures, with a high percentage of respondents indicating they had seen the materials and that they were a major factor in their decision.
s distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted a company representative to ask a contractor or a technical staff member to examine the energy efficiency options for the facility. Impact of Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promotiona...
AI summary Energy-efficiency promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia influenced company representatives to consider energy-efficient measures. In 2016 and 2017, a majority of respondents agreed that the materials prompted them to evaluate cost-effective measures, with slight decreases in agreement from 2016 to 2017.
1 Base: Respondents who were not satisfied with the rebate amounts (NOT SATISFIED: S3c<8) Multiple responses S4d. Why were you not more satisfied with the time required to receive rebate? 2016 2017 Reasons Not More Satisfied with the Time...
AI summary Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the time required to receive rebates, citing delays in processing and lack of communication. The Business Energy Rebates program also faced implementation issues with energy efficiency measures.
S3d<8) Multiple responses B1. Did you encounter any problems with the [MEASURE CATEGORY] energy efficiency measures you implemented as part of the Business Energy Rebates program? Barrier Faced 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 74 70 70 Yes 18% 4...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates program faced some challenges in implementing energy efficiency measures, with 18% of respondents in 2015, 4% in 2016, and 9% in 2017 reporting problems. The majority of respondents did not encounter any issues, with 82%, 96%, and 90% respectively indicating no problems.
9 2 6 No 4 1 - Base: Respondents who had problems with measures Project No. 6138 27 Efficient Product Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report B5. Do you have any suggestions to improve the Business Energy Rebat...
AI summary The document asks for suggestions to improve the Business Energy Rebates Program, considering aspects such as process, measures covered, marketing, interactions with program staff, and program forms.
e the Business Energy Rebates Program? Consider all aspects of the program: process, measures covered, marketing, interactions with program staff, and program forms. Anything else? Suggestions to Improve BER 2015 2016 2017 Sample Size 74 7...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates Program (BER) is being evaluated for improvements, with suggestions focusing on user-friendly forms, better rebates, marketing, information sessions, and improved communication. The data shows varying levels of feedback across different years, with a significant portion of respondents indicating no recommendations or uncertainty.
Table 1: Total Number of Projects and Tracked Savings Used for Final On-site Visit Sampling2 First Second Actual Total Tracked Savings Sample Sample Sample Sample Measure Category Size Size3 Size % Square Root kWh n n n n of Savings4 Agric...
AI summary Table 1 presents the total number of projects and tracked savings for different energy efficiency measures, including the number of samples taken during the first, second, and actual on-site visits. The data highlights the distribution of savings across categories such as HVAC, commercial lighting, and motors and VSDs.
Motors and VSDs 703,959 11.8% 9 2 4 6 Total 10,433,682 100.0% 80 51 31 82 In total, the Evaluator reviewed 82 individual projects. The actual sample deviated from the planned sample in four categories due to a limited number of projects. R...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed 82 projects, with some deviations from the planned sample due to limited project numbers. The on-site visit protocol was slightly modified from the 2016 BER protocol to collect more detailed information on lighting use. The protocol includes general and measure-specific data sections based on the 2017 CIRx Screening Tool.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report New equipment installed Baseline equipment Quantity Wattage/Unit Quantity Wattage Additional Type Tracking On-Site Tracking On-Site Notes: Type Tracking On-Site Tracking On-Site...
AI summary The document details the installation of new equipment and baseline equipment under the Efficient Product Rebates Program, including tracking sheets, validation, and additional information such as lamp count, location, and existing strip lengths. It also mentions motors and VFDs in the context of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Motors and VFDs: Motors Total number of motors installed: In the Tracking Sheet Validated On-Site Explanation if quantities are different: Location: Motor Type: Motor Size [hp]: National El...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia includes data collection forms for assessing motor and VFD installations, including motor type, efficiency, usage hours, and control methods, as part of the Efficient Product Rebates Program.
ed: (Supply fan, return fan, exhaust fan, chilled water pump, boiler feed water, or other (Specify)): Hours of use (Indicate the corresponding schedule number): Approx. hours of operation [h/yr]: Specify Manufacturer and Model Number of VF...
AI summary The document contains a form for collecting information on HVAC systems and energy-efficient equipment, including details on fan hours, VFD models, and heat pump installations. It also references the Efficient Product Rebates Program and the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Model Number: Quantity: Explanation if quantity is different: If not, why and since when? Fan diameter [ft]: Fan Power: Airflow (Vent/Circ only): Hours of use [hr/yr]: Project No. 6138 45 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova S...
AI summary The text contains forms and data collection templates related to the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It includes fields for various equipment types, their specifications, and usage details for project number 6138.
acking sheet by Econoler. Additionally, record Manufacturer and Model Number, and all Technical Data (Operating Temp, CFM, Size, Control Info) Compressed Air Products Installed Cycling refrigerated air dryer Manufacturer: Model Number: Com...
AI summary The document contains forms and data collection sheets for compressed air products installed under the Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including details on refrigerated air dryers, VSD screw compressors, air-entraining air nozzles, and no-loss drains. It requires information on manufacturers, models, capacities, and operational status.
Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Commercial Griddles Location Product Type Manufacturer Model Number Width Installed (ft): Quantity: Explanation if quantity is different: Specify if electr...
AI summary The document outlines forms and data collection requirements for the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, focusing on commercial griddles, refrigeration/freezers, and ice makers. It includes fields for equipment details, usage, and ENERGY STAR certification validation.
Explanation if different: Is the equipment still used? If not, why? Is the equipment controlled by T° and optical sensors located in exhaust hood? Was VSD commissioned? [Y/N]: Laundry: Collect the information in the table below if commerci...
AI summary The document includes forms and data collection tools for evaluating the installation and usage of commercial laundry equipment under the Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It seeks information about equipment usage, control systems, and technical specifications.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report BER : INSTANT REBATES PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Could I speak with the person in your organization who would have been involved with the Efficiency Nova Scotia Business Energy Rebate...
AI summary This document is a survey questionnaire from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, targeting participants in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Program. It aims to gather feedback on the purchase of energy-efficient products and the rebate process.
rd and keep data) V3. Are you the person in your organization who is most knowledgeable about deciding to purchase these [PRODUCT]? 1. Yes (If Yes go to P Series) 2. No Project No. 6138 58 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on identifying the most knowledgeable individual within an organization regarding product purchases and understanding the reasons behind choosing a specific product over a standard one.
ion already decided to purchase [PRODUCT] before knowing the price of those products? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) 97 (Did not get any quotes) FR2. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a rebate for the purchase of efficient lighti...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, asking respondents about their purchasing behavior in the absence of rebates and their awareness of product certifications such as ENERGY STAR.
hting products c. Information received by a distributor on high- _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused efficiency lighting products Project No. 6138 61 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Cro...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and their influence on purchasing decisions regarding efficient lighting products. It explores whether prior participation in such programs affected the decision-making process and whether it led to inquiries about efficient lighting options.
mpany representative asked a contractor or a distributor about efficient lighting options for your facility. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) CI2c. [IF CI1=1] Because of your company’s previous participation in an Effici...
AI summary The text discusses a survey related to Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials and their influence on company decisions regarding energy efficiency programs, such as the Business Energy Rebates program and efficient product rebates. It includes questions about participation, awareness, and decision-making influenced by promotional materials.
pany representative to ask a contractor or a distributor about efficient lighting options for your facility. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) CI4c. [IF CI3=1] The energy-efficiency promotional materials distributed by Ef...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to energy efficiency programs, specifically about decision-making criteria for implementing energy-efficient lighting and the influence of promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report and a project number.
of the following, if any, does your organization have in place for the facility where the efficient lighting products were implemented? READ AND ROTATE - CODE ONLY ONE PER STATEMENT a. A person responsible for monitoring or managing energy...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about energy efficiency practices and motivations for adopting efficient lighting products, with a focus on monitoring energy usage, setting energy-saving goals, and policies promoting energy efficiency. It also references an evaluation report on an efficient product rebate program.
17% To improve energy efficiency 32% 5% Quality of efficiency products 7% 20% What the customer/owner wanted 3% 2% Take advantage of program rebates 3% 8% Recommended by contractor 2% - Protect the environment 2% 3% Update equipment 2% 20%...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses customer motivations for participating in the Efficient Product Rebates Program, with a significant portion citing the desire to improve energy efficiency. It also includes data on whether distributors recommended the product to customers, with a majority indicating they did.
Yes 67% No 32% Don’t know 2% P3. Were you aware that you received a rebate when purchasing these [PRODUCT]? P4. I just want to make sure I understand – When you purchased [PRODUCT], you were unaware that a rebate was given to reduce the pr...
AI summary The text presents survey results regarding customer awareness of rebates received when purchasing products, specifically under Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates Program. Most respondents were aware of the rebate, but fewer were aware it was part of the BER program.
47% No 53% FR2. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a rebate for the purchase of efficient lighting products. If your organization had not received the rebate and the cost for [PRODUCT] had been about $[REBATE AVERAGE VALUE BY CATEGORY] higher,...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from an evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia's Efficient Product Rebates Program, focusing on whether organizations would have paid the full cost of efficient lighting products without the rebate and awareness of product certifications.
from 0 to 10, where 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the influence of each of the following in your organization’s decision to purchase [PRODUCT]. 2017 Influence of Factors in Decision to Implement Energy-...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the influence of various factors in an organization's decision to purchase energy-efficient products, focusing on rebate programs and information provided by program representatives. It also asks about previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs.
the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs? Previous Participation in Another ENS Program 2017 Sample Size 60 Yes 75% No 23% Don’t know 2% CI2a. The organization’s previous participation in an Efficiency Nov...
AI summary The text discusses customer participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, including previous participation in ENS programs and its influence on purchasing decisions. It also references the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report and the Efficient Product Rebates Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report CI2b. Because of the company’s previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program and what was learned by participating in the program, a company representative asked a contractor...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia shows that 76% of respondents who previously participated in an ENS program agreed that their participation influenced them to seek efficient lighting options. Additionally, 84% of respondents considered the cost-effectiveness of products when evaluating options for their facilities.
13% Don’t know 2% Base: Respondents who previously participated in another ENS program CI3. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program, had you at any time in the past already seen Efficiency Nova Scotia promotional materi...
AI summary This section of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on company decisions to participate in the Business Energy Rebates program. A majority of respondents (90%) had previously seen ENS promotional materials, which were a major factor in their decision to purchase energy-efficient products.
a Scotia were a major factor in the company’s decision to purchase [PRODUCT]. Impact of Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials 2017 Sample Size 54 Agree 57% Disagree 43% Don’t know - Base: Respondents who previously sa...
AI summary The promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia had a significant impact on company representatives, prompting them to consider energy-efficient lighting options and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of [PRODUCT]. A majority of respondents agreed with these outcomes.
distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted a company representative to take into account the cost-effectiveness of [PRODUCT] when evaluating different options for the facility. Impact of Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promotiona...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials on decision-making regarding energy efficiency, highlighting that 89% of respondents who saw the materials agreed to their influence. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report and a question about using a payback period threshold for implementing energy efficiency lighting.
g, does your organization use a payback period threshold as a decisional criterion? Payback Period for Decision Making 2017 Sample Size 60 Yes 70% No 27% Don’t know 3% D2. What is the maximum payback period acceptable in order to move forw...
AI summary The document presents survey results on the use of payback period thresholds for decision-making in energy efficiency lighting upgrades. A majority (70%) of respondents use a payback period threshold, while 27% do not. The acceptable maximum payback period ranges from 6-11 months to 5 years, with an average of 2.6 years.
17% Average 2.6 years Excludes Don’t know responses D3. Which of the following, if any, does your organization have in place for the facility where the efficient lighting products were implemented? Processes in Place in Facilities Where Me...
AI summary The text discusses survey results related to energy efficiency practices in facilities where efficient lighting products were implemented, including the presence of energy monitoring processes and policies. It also references the Efficient Product Rebates Program and an interview guide for BER instant rebates.
R: INSTANT REBATES INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH DISTRIBUTORS Interview Date and Time Company name Name Area code and phone number Email Interview Length Introduction Thank you for taking the time to speak with me. Today, I am interested in your op...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for evaluating Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Business Energy Rebates program. It outlines the process for gathering feedback from distributors regarding their involvement in the program, focusing on the stocking and supplying of specific energy-efficient products.
TH STORE MANAGER/HEAD OFFICE CONTACT - CONTINUE] › Don’t know [CONTINUE INTERVIEW WITH STORE MANAGER/HEAD OFFICE CONTACT - CONTINUE] › Refused [THANK AND TERMINATE] Project No. 6138 73 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary The text discusses the factors contributing to the increase in LED lamp and fixture market share in Nova Scotia over the past six years, including regulations, environmental awareness, price reductions, and technological improvements. It also asks about the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs on these factors.
extent have the programs and activities from Efficiency Nova Scotia influenced each of those same factors? Rate Efficiency Nova Scotia’s influence using a percentage from 0 to 100%. Awareness-raising of environmental issues among clients _...
AI summary The text asks about the influence of Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs on factors like client awareness, price reductions, and technology appeal. It also inquires about the impact of the Business Energy Rebates Program on product offerings and staff knowledge, specifically regarding linear LED fixtures.
fied linear LED fixtures carried by your company? RECORD RATING: _ RECORD EXPLANATION: Section B: LED Downlight Fixtures Ask if LED downlight fixtures were rebated through the program I have a few questions about your sales of LED downligh...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding the sales of LED downlight fixtures under the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on sales trends, competitor activity, and the proportion of residential purchases. It seeks to understand changes in sales volume and the factors influencing them.
purchase LEDs at a good price, etc.] B1b. What percentage of the LED downlight fixtures you sold through the program was purchased for residential application so far in 2017? Project No. 6138 76 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency...
AI summary The document includes questions from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report regarding the Efficient Product Rebates Program, specifically focusing on the Business Energy Rebates Program's impact on the sale of LED downlight fixtures, including the percentage of residential purchases and the influence of the program on customer product choices.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report D2. In 2017, the Business Energy Rebates Program provided a per-unit incentive of $3 to $4, depending on the type of general-use/decorative LED lamps. If this incentive had not been offered...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report includes questions about the Business Energy Rebates Program's impact on the sales of LED lamps. It asks participants whether the incentive influenced their sales volume and how important the program was in encouraging the use of LED lamps over other types of bulbs.
nt,” how would you rate the program’s influence on your customers’ choice of general-use/decorative LED lamps instead of incandescent bulbs or CFLs? RECORD RATING: _ RECORD EXPLANATION: D6. Is the current incentive of $3 per lamp sufficien...
AI summary The text includes questions about the influence of the Efficient Product Rebates Program on customer choices of LED lamps and the sufficiency of rebate incentives. It also asks about the program's impact on product models carried by companies and overall satisfaction with the program.
he overall program S2. The program support and communications provided by ENS S3. The rebate processing, tracking and reporting S4. Finally, do you have any suggestions to improve the program? Record: No suggestion at this time Those are a...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Product Rebates Program, specifically focusing on the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for lighting products in the BER-Mail-in service. The EUL is calculated by dividing the rated lifetime of lamps or fixtures by annual HOU and adjusting for baseline increases.
EUL values by product type are presented in Table 5 at the end of this subsection. The following provides details on the methodology for establishing equivalent EUL values for LED lamps and fixtures. The Evaluator used the annual HOU value...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to establish equivalent EUL values for LED lamps and fixtures, referencing BER Instant Rebates and product specifications. It also outlines changes in regulations affecting general-use lamps, decorative lamps, and reflector lamps, particularly in relation to Canadian and U.S. energy efficiency standards.
t Lamps, www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes-standards/products/6869 (Last accessed January 24, 2018). 6 US EPA. “Summary of the Energy Independence and Security Act. Public Law 110-140 (2007)”. Online: www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/su...
AI summary Natural Resources Canada plans to update the minimum energy performance requirement for general service lamps in 2019, aligning with EISA 2020. This will effectively ban the import and fabrication of efficient incandescent light bulbs, with baseline changes expected to occur in 2024.
an EUL of 5.7 years. The baseline for this lighting product will therefore not increase throughout its EUL and so the equivalent EUL is equal to the EUL of 5.7 years. Non-recessed downlight fixtures Since non-recessed LED downlight fixture...
AI summary The document discusses the Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) of non-recessed LED downlight fixtures, explaining how their baseline energy consumption is affected by changes in regulations and the transition from halogen incandescent lamps to CFL equivalents. The equivalent EUL is calculated to be 6.8 years.
the typical baseline products are already more efficient than the current regulation, which further suggests that a change in regulations would not affect the baseline efficiency in the near future. 8 As imposed by U.S. federal legislation...
AI summary The text discusses the efficiency of baseline products and the evaluation of the Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It references the use of EUL values for occupancy sensors and cites reports from 2007 and 2008 to justify the 10-year EUL.
Equivalent Rated Life Annual Tracked EUL Lighting Measure List Category EUL (hours) HOU EUL (years) (years) (years) BER Instant Rebate Measures 1 x 4 Luminaires 2 x 2 Luminaires & Retrofit Linear LED Kits 2 x 4 Luminaires & Retrofit 50,000...
AI summary The document presents a table comparing different lighting measures, including their rated life, annual hours of use, and estimated useful life (EUL) in years. It includes various categories such as linear LED fixtures, decorative LED lamps, and reflector LED lamps, along with their respective EUL values.
Equivalent Rated Life Annual Tracked EUL Lighting Measure List Category EUL (hours) HOU EUL (years) (years) (years) Additional BER Mail-In Measures Linear LED High-bay Luminaires 100,000 4,410 12 22.7 22.7 Fixtures Troffers 90,000 4,410 14...
AI summary The document presents a table comparing various lighting measures, including their rated life, annual hours of use, tracked EUL, and equivalent useful life (EUL) in years. It includes categories such as linear LED fixtures, refrigerated case lighting, and outdoor LED luminaires, with details on their performance and lifespan.
201616 DEER, 2008 VFD for milk vacuum pumps 15 PA Consulting Group, 2009 Air entraining air nozzles 15 PA Consulting Group, 2009 Air receiver for load/no load screw PA Consulting Group, 2009 15 Compressed Air compressors ERS 200517 Cycling...
AI summary The document lists various energy efficiency measures along with associated studies and reports, including references to technical manuals and measure life studies conducted by organizations such as PA Consulting Group and Energy & Resource Solutions.
anual for Energy Conservation Improvement Programs Version 2.1 Final, December 2016. 17 Energy & Resource Solutions. Measure Life Study Report prepared for The Massachusetts Joint Utilities, 2005. Project No. 6138 89 Efficient Product Reba...
AI summary The document discusses the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, including details on air source and air-to-water heat pumps with their respective estimated useful life (EUL) based on studies by GDS Associates from 2007.
HVAC Commercial heat pump clothes 11 DEER, 2014 dryers Ground source heat pumps; 25 Estimation by the DOE18 HVAC hotel occupancy sensors 8 DEER, 2008 Packaged terminal heat pumps 15 GDS, 2007 (PTHP) GDS, 2007 Water source heat pumps; 15 ER...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures with associated energy savings and references to studies and organizations that estimated the savings. Examples include heat pumps, HVAC systems, and IT/datacenter efficiency measures.
DEER, 2014 ENERGY STAR Calculator20 Dishwashers 10 or 15 10 for under the counter, 15 for door type DEER, 2008, 2011, 2014 Freezers/refrigerators 12 ENERGY STAR Calculator GDS, 2007 Kitchen DEER, 2008, 2011 Fryers 12 ENERGY STAR Calculator...
AI summary The text lists energy efficiency standards and calculators for various kitchen appliances, including dishwashers, freezers, fryers, griddles, and hot food holding cabinets. It references multiple sources such as DEER, ENERGY STAR, GDS, and PG&E.
PG&E, 2007 18 U.S. Department of Energy, Geothermal Heat Pumps, https://energy.gov/energysaver/heat-and-cool/heat-pump- systems/geothermal-heat-pumps#306534-tab-1 (last accessed February 15, 2018). 19 Illinois Energy Efficiency Stakeholder...
AI summary The document references sources related to energy efficiency, including geothermal heat pumps and technical reference manuals, and mentions the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Brushless DC motors 15 ERS, 2005 DEER, 2008 Motors and VFDs Energy efficient motors 15 DEER, 2014 DEER, 2008 Variable Frequency Drives 15 ERS, 2005 Navigant, 201323 Pumping High efficiency circulator pumps 15 PA Consulting Group, 2009 Disp...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures and technologies, such as brushless DC motors, variable frequency drives, and high-efficiency circulator pumps, along with associated studies and reports from organizations like ERS, DEER, and PA Consulting Group. These technologies are evaluated for their energy efficiency and performance.
15 Vermont TRM, 2015 Vertical refrigeration open to closed DEER, 2008 12 cooler conversions Zero energy doors 12 DEER 2008 Solar Solar water heaters 20 ENERGY STAR 24 Electric to natural gas water heating 15 DEER, 2014 Water Heating Heat p...
AI summary The document references various energy efficiency measures and their associated savings algorithms, cost assumptions, and rebates. It includes data from studies and reports on technologies such as solar water heaters and heat pump water heaters, as well as references to efficiency programs like the Efficient Product Rebates and Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
OTHERWISE MEAN (PA1; PA2; PA3) CI2/4a. [The company’s previous participation in an ENS program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] was a major factor in your decision to implement an energy-efficient measure....
AI summary The text discusses how participation in an ENS program or exposure to ENS promotional materials influenced a company's decision to implement energy-efficient measures, including prompting discussions with technical staff and considering cost-effectiveness. It also outlines a formula to revise free-ridership (FR) based on responses to these questions.
: the interactive effects factor based on the location of the lighting measure › : the coincidence factor › 1,000 : conversion from watts to kilowatts Tracked Savings Calculation For the existing lighting measure, ENS used the lamp wattage...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of tracked savings for a lighting measure, using wattage data from participant applications and product specifications. It references the replacement of 295 W High Pressure Sodium lamps with 170 W lamps as a specific case.
cts Factor (demand) 1 Tracking Report Peak Coincidence Factor 0 Tracking Report Annual Energy Consumption (kWh) 11,700 Calculation Annual Peak Demand (kW) 0 Calculation Tracked Savings Tracked Energy Savings (kWh) 8,603 Tracking Report Tra...
AI summary This document discusses the revised savings calculations for the Efficient Product Rebates program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, based on adjustments to hours of use, lamp quantity, and interactive effects (IE) factors specific to building types. Table 8 outlines the IE factors used for a retail building.
ntified building type. A summary of the IE factors that were used for the measure treated in this example, based on the fact that the measure was located in a retail building, is outlined in Table 8. Table 8: Interactive Effects Factors IE...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects factors used in energy efficiency calculations, particularly for a retail building. It includes specific percentages for peak demand and energy use related to electrical heating and cooling. The document also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Table 9: Revised Variables for Example Calculation Baseline Measure – 295 W High Pressure Sodium Lamp Parameter Value Source Existing Lamp Quantity 33 Validated On-site Existing Lamp Wattage (W) 295 Validated On-site Calculated Based on th...
AI summary This table presents a comparison between baseline and new measures for energy consumption in a building, including parameters such as lamp wattage, hours of operation, and interactive effects factors. The data is used to calculate annual energy consumption and peak demand for both existing and efficient lighting systems.
Errors arising during the course of all survey activities other than sampling. Non-sampling error Non-sampling errors tend to lead to bias in measurements and are very difficult to quantify. Peak coincidence The percentage of measure deman...
AI summary The text discusses various statistical and measurement concepts relevant to energy efficiency programs, including non-sampling errors, peak coincidence factor, precision, random sampling error, sample size, secondary market impacts, tracked savings, and unitary savings. These terms are essential for evaluating the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives.
anizations with incentives to help them achieve significant and predictable electricity savings in new BNI buildings, as well as in additions to buildings and major renovations in existing buildings. Custom Incentives Program ix Custom Inc...
AI summary The Custom Incentives Program supports energy efficiency in new and existing buildings through various initiatives. In 2017, the program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, contributing to reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The program's performance is evaluated over the period from 2011 to 2017.
h. Figure 1 below illustrates the evolution in net energy and peak demand savings at the generator from 2011 through 2017. Figure 1: Overview of Custom Performance, 2011-2017 Net Savings at the Generator 32.930 33.585 33.947 28.638 20.709...
AI summary The document presents an overview of energy and peak demand savings from 2011 to 2017, highlighting the Retrofit service as the primary contributor to savings. It also outlines the evaluation process for the Retrofit service in 2017, including interviews with consultants and participants.
study went on to complete an energy-saving project. All participants were satisfied with how their projects progressed, suggesting Retrofit delivery met the needs of participants. Retrofit Successes Consultants were satisfied with Retrofit...
AI summary The Retrofit program under Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) was well-received by participants and consultants, who highlighted satisfaction with technical assistance, interactions with ENS staff, and the overall service. Financial barriers, particularly upfront costs, were the main obstacles to participation. Participants expressed a high likelihood of re-participation in the future.
tor from thoroughly revising the tracked savings of these projects, which accounted for 19.4 percent of the tracked energy savings and 15.9 percent of the peak demand savings of the sampled projects. Custom Incentives Program xii Custom In...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for the Retrofit program, using historical free-ridership and spillover data. It calculates energy and peak demand savings, along with associated CO2 emissions reductions and lifetime energy savings.
represent 9,415 tonnes of CO2 eq of avoided greenhouse gas emissions annually. Based on an average EUL of 13.6 years, the net lifetime energy savings were established at 196.090 GWh. New Construction In 2017, six projects were completed th...
AI summary The New Construction service completed six projects in 2017, with five reviewed for energy efficiency. Discrepancies in modeling and errors in calculations led to adjustments, reducing energy savings by 30% and increasing peak demand savings by 3.41 times. These projects avoided 3,756 tonnes of CO2 eq annually, with a net lifetime energy savings of 113.288 GWh.
sent 3,756 tonnes of CO2 eq of avoided greenhouse gas emissions annually. Based on an average EUL of 19.7 years, the net lifetime energy savings were established at 113.288 GWh. Building Optimization In 2017, six projects were completed th...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia, including greenhouse gas emission reductions and the Building Optimization service. It highlights the impact of the Custom Incentives Program and mentions the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The evaluated net savings for Custom are 8 percent below the tracked value. This reduction was mostly due to New Construction, which had its gross energy savings reduced by 27 percent this...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report indicates that Custom program net savings are 8% below tracked values, primarily due to a 27% reduction in New Construction energy savings. Retrofit contributed 70% of Custom’s gross savings with minimal adjustments. The report recommends improvements to EMIS and highlights the need for greater implementation of New Construction and Building Optimization services.
ort to each participant and maximizing the added value of ENS support, that is, involving specialized consultants in retrocommissioning only when detailed investigation of energy-saving opportunities is a project’s objective. Better defini...
AI summary The text discusses the need for better definition of objectives and eligibility criteria for Building Optimization projects, emphasizing the importance of documenting basecase conditions to ensure accurate evaluation of energy savings. It highlights issues with current practices, such as unclear criteria and inadequate documentation of pre-implementation conditions.
r project implementation, the Evaluator recommends that ENS gather more information about the pre-implementation conditions to support savings evaluation afterwards. Custom Incentives Program xvi Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova S...
AI summary The document discusses the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) program, which supports industrial businesses and institutions in achieving energy savings through real-time data analysis and system implementation. The 2017 evaluation of the program was based on documentation reviews, interviews, and project assessments.
based on a program component documentation review, interviews with the program manager and a review of four projects (including phone interviews with participants). EMIS Key Findings EMIS Performance EMIS aimed to achieve 4.0 GWh in net en...
AI summary The EMIS program aimed for 4.0 GWh in net energy savings and 0.1 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017 but achieved 1.402 GWh and 0.255 MW, respectively. The program also avoided 916 tonnes of CO2 eq annually. Four participants consistently reported savings from 2015 to 2017, while three additional projects were in various stages of implementation.
tainability plan, help to involve participating facilities’ maintenance staff in the process, and that ENS could provide more support and manpower during the installation process. EMIS Energy Savings In 2016, the Evaluator made a distincti...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from four projects in 2017, emphasizing the distinction between cumulative and incremental savings. The Evaluator recommended tracking incremental savings, which reflect new or improved energy efficiency measures, rather than cumulative savings. This approach provides more accurate impact results for the program component.
Tracked Savings 0.137 MW 0.137 MW 1.00 0.137 MW Evaluation Results 0.137 MW 0.255 MW 1.00 0.255 MW In 2017, the Evaluator did not adjust the incremental savings of the two projects for which a proper incremental baseline approach was used...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Program Evaluation Report highlights a 20% reduction in energy savings due to changes in evaluation methods and the addition of peak demand savings to two projects. The Evaluator found that EMIS was effectively delivered, with high participant satisfaction and additional savings in the second or third year of participation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report INTRODUCTION Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is a franchise held by EfficiencyOne4 and is responsible for helping Nova Scotians improve the energy efficiency of their homes and workplaces. ENS...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is responsible for designing and delivering energy efficiency programs, funded by Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia. Econoler was commissioned to evaluate ENS’s 2017 demand-side management (DSM) program portfolio and assess the impact of energy efficiency codes and standards in Nova Scotia.
Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement C C R Product Rebates Program Instant Savings C C R R Home Energy Assessment C C C C Existing Residential Green Heat C C C C C Program Efficient Product Installation C C C C New Residential Progra...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency programs, including residential and business rebate initiatives, home energy assessments, and strategic energy management. It highlights the Custom Incentives Program and the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, noting that the process evaluation focuses on the Retrofit service of the Custom program.
signed in such a way as to get the participant involved from the preliminary design stage in order to have the energy efficiency measures effectively implemented and achieve maximum energy savings. Custom 3 Custom Incentives Program Effici...
AI summary The Building Optimization program, formerly known as Existing Building Commissioning, aims to achieve energy and peak demand savings by implementing no-cost or low-cost energy efficiency measures through a recommissioning process. It involves two stages and requires specific application documents and a measurement and verification report.
ion Application, a Master List of Findings and an Implementation Application. Measurement and verification (M&V) must be performed and accounted for in an M&V report submitted by the service provider. For all three services, Business Devel...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for measurement and verification (M&V) reports in energy efficiency programs, explains how savings are claimed for different project types, and mentions follow-up actions on 2016 evaluation report recommendations for the Custom program component.
mplates and tools to be used by Retrofit staff and the service providers to achieve better accuracy. These tools include a site visit checklist, a peak demand savings guide and a general M&V guide. Custom 5 Custom Incentives Program Effici...
AI summary The document discusses the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It outlines changes made in 2017 to improve participation in the New Construction category, including requirements for kick-off meetings, incentive adjustments, and baseline alignment with the 2015 NECB. Follow-up monitoring is planned for Q1 2018.
da for Buildings (NECB). ENS will be following up with consultants and participants in Q1 2018, and monitoring any changes in New Construction participation. 1.3 Participation History Retrofit In 2017, a total of 64 projects achieved savin...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights participation in the Retrofit program, noting 64 projects achieved savings, with a decrease in project numbers and gross energy savings compared to previous years. This was attributed to smaller project sizes in 2017. Prior to 2014, many lighting projects were completed through Retrofit instead of other ENS programs.
Custom 2% Renewable 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Custom 7 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report New Construction A total of seven New Construction projects reported savings in 2017, of which six were com...
AI summary In 2017, seven New Construction projects participated in the Custom Incentives Program, with six completed and one reporting partial savings. Energy savings varied significantly due to the small number of projects. Since 2014, a new savings calculation methodology has been adopted, considering the original design intent of participants rather than current practices, leading to changes in energy savings calculations.
explains in part the disparities in gross energy savings per completed project for New Construction since 2015. Figure 5: Overview of Participation in New Construction (2011-2017) Participation Gross Savings 924.837 9.464 729.947 646.699 5...
AI summary The text provides an overview of participation and energy savings in new construction projects from 2011 to 2017, highlighting disparities in gross energy savings per completed project. It includes figures showing the number of completed projects, energy savings in GWh, and demand savings in MW.
awareness. For example, one respondent noted 30 years’ experience and assumed there are efficiency programs in any place they work and could not tell how they specifically became aware of Retrofit. Custom 13 Custom Incentives Program Effic...
AI summary The document discusses the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, highlighting participant diversity and project types. It notes that industrial participants completed air audit and upgrade projects, and three participants completed two Custom projects of the same type.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Service awareness sources may change in subsequent years based on ENS’s additional outreach efforts beginning in 2017. According to the program manager, an emphasis on outreach efforts led...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights increased project initiation due to enhanced outreach efforts and the addition of new BDMs, focusing on specific industries like aquaculture. Retrofit projects were primarily driven by performance improvements and long-term cost savings, with fewer participants motivated by environmental reasons.
vels. Lowering utility bills for long-term savings was also a popular reason to participate (10), and far fewer participated for environmental reasons (2), such as a desire to reduce greenhouse gases. 3.3 Retrofit Delivery Consultants repo...
AI summary The text discusses participant motivations for energy efficiency programs, noting that cost savings were a primary driver, while environmental concerns were less common. It also covers the role of consultants in retrofit projects, including variations in their involvement across different phases, and clarifies that BDMs provide a list of potential consultants rather than direct referrals.
to complete a Retrofit project. According to service staff, about 85 percent of completed studies result in a Retrofit project and some portion of the remaining 15 percent may result in BER projects. Consultants reported the M&V phase gene...
AI summary The document discusses the Retrofit and BER project completion rates, with 85% of studies resulting in Retrofit projects. Consultants generally report satisfaction with the M&V process, though some use their own tools. Retrofit successes are noted, with consultants praising service requirements and business expansion opportunities, though one found the process challenging for smaller projects.
jects progressed. From verifying eligibility through measurement and verification, participants were pleased with their projects and 11 mentioned specific service elements they especially appreciated. › Five indicated the incentives availa...
AI summary Participants in the energy efficiency program expressed high satisfaction with ENS resources, particularly the support from BDMs. They highlighted the value of incentives, technical assistance, and improvements in the participation process, including digitization of paperwork. Some noted the benefits of equipment loans and improvements in equipment performance.
of these two participants reported, unprompted, that they would like to have regular contact with someone like a BDM to help their firm identify additional projects. 8 See footnote on page 15. Custom 18 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency...
AI summary The report highlights positive feedback from participants who worked with a BDM (Business Development Manager) in the Custom Incentives Program, noting their satisfaction with the BDM's responsiveness and support in identifying energy-saving projects. Most participants are planning future ENS (Energy Nova Scotia) projects, while one participant indicated no immediate plans due to a recent Retrofit project.
. The one participant that did not indicate an interest in a project stated that they had a small facility and their recent Retrofit project addressed their sole major energy-using piece of equipment. 3.5 Barriers to Proceeding with a Proj...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to implementing Retrofit projects, with financial considerations being the most common obstacle. Participants cited high upfront costs, long payback periods, split incentive problems, and difficulty in obtaining financing. Some businesses also hesitate due to reluctance toward unproven technology and lack of time to implement measures.
pants, three consultants, and the program manager suggested ways to improve service outreach and processes. To improve service outreach and increase participation, respondents suggested the following. › Two participants and one consultant...
AI summary Respondents suggest improving service outreach and processes for ENS. Suggestions include greater promotion, training for facilities staff, and focusing on non-lighting projects. ENS is working on identifying market-specific measures and has specialists in areas such as refrigeration, aquaculture, and industrial applications.
applications, including compressed air. These specialists have been helpful in supporting participants in these specific areas. To improve service processes, respondents suggested the following. › Two consultant respondents noted that Retr...
AI summary Respondents suggest that the Retrofit program is not effective for small projects with savings between $2,000 and $5,000 due to the costs of studies and M&V. Some respondents also recommend expanding efficiency services to include gas, oil, and water projects beyond ENS's current focus on electric projects.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Adjustments Made to Other Retrofit Projects Those projects in the “other Retrofit” category involved a mixture of process, motor/drive, refrigeration, HVAC and insulation measures. Of the 1...
AI summary This report evaluates adjustments made to energy savings for 'other Retrofit' projects under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. Energy savings adjustments were minor, with an overall ratio of 0.996, while peak demand adjustments were more significant, resulting in a ratio of 0.741. One project had a major adjustment due to an incorrect temperature assumption in the M&V data.
ring estimates of easily measurable variables were used. Of the entire sample, these four projects accounted for 19.4 percent of the tracked energy savings and 16.4 percent of the peak demand savings. M&V documentation has improved in over...
AI summary The text discusses improvements in M&V documentation and the need for a change management process to track project adjustments. It also mentions the use of standardized methods for calculating interactive effects in lighting projects, referencing a 1993 ASHRAE Journal article.
zed approach based on a methodology published in the ASHRAE Journal.10 10 Rundquist, Robert A. et al., “Calculating Lighting and HVAC Interactions”, in ASHRAE Journal, November 1993, pp. 28-37. Custom 24 Custom Incentives Program Efficienc...
AI summary The document discusses the Effective Useful Life (EUL) values applied to energy efficiency measures in the ENS program portfolio, with specific EUL values listed for various categories such as lighting, HVAC, and refrigeration.
20 Custom – Other 10 Water Heating 15 Currently, these EUL values are not shown for each project in the Custom tracking sheet. For each project reviewed, the Evaluator assigned the corresponding EUL value based on the measure category iden...
AI summary The Evaluator assigned Equivalent Useful Lifetime (EUL) values to energy efficiency measures based on technical references and project baselines. A dual-baseline scenario, where baseline efficiency increases over time, was not found in the 26 sampled Retrofit projects, though it may occur in future projects.
5.835 GWh and the total gross peak demand savings are estimated at 1.148 MW at the generator, as listed in Table 11 below. Gross lifetime energy savings for Retroftir were determined at 215.349 GWh.
AI summary The text provides figures related to energy savings, including 5.835 GWh of total gross peak demand savings and 215.349 GWh of gross lifetime energy savings for Retroftir, as detailed in Table 11.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report For 2017, Retrofit generated 14.418 GWh in net energy savings and 1.045 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator. The results obtained are listed in Table 12 below. Overall, using the...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia shows that Retrofit generated 14.418 GWh in net energy savings and 1.045 MW in net peak demand savings. Using a Nova Scotia-specific factor, these savings are estimated to avoid 9,415 tonnes of CO2 eq annually, with a total lifetime energy savings of 196.090 GWh over 13.6 years.
and one did not since he was very satisfied and could not think of anything that should be improved. The participant who provided improvement suggestions indicated that it would be helpful for ENS to: › Better communicate technical informa...
AI summary The 2017 New Construction impact evaluation aimed to assess energy and peak demand savings. The evaluation reviewed five of six completed projects in 2017, including one multi-year project, and found that four projects were started and completed in 2017 with final savings claims made in the same year.
tion projects completed in 2017. Four projects were started in 2017 and their final savings claims were all made in 2017. The fifth project was a multi-year project. 6.1.1 Project Review Findings In 2017, six projects were completed throug...
AI summary In 2017, six projects were completed through the New Construction service, with five undergoing detailed technical reviews and site visits. While energy efficiency measures were implemented as planned, savings were adjusted due to errors in energy models and subsequent calculations.
probably because the conversion from gas to electricity consumption was not 12 This effectively means that electricity savings resulting from fuel-switching are considered under New Construction. Custom 31 Custom Incentives Program Efficie...
AI summary The document discusses issues with the calculation of energy savings in New Construction projects, particularly related to fuel-switching and efficient appliances. Adjustments are recommended to account for interactive effects and heating system capacities, which significantly reduced the evaluated energy savings for two projects by 38 and 43 percent.
°C (corresponding to the actual temperature of the lobster tank water) to establish a more representative COP. Along with other minor adjustments, this resulted in a downward adjustment of 29 percent. The last project for which heat pump m...
AI summary The text discusses adjustments made to heat pump models in a multi-unit residential building, leading to a 25% reduction in estimated energy savings. The adjustments were made to better represent the actual performance of the systems, including the use of monitoring data to obtain a yearly COP for modeling purposes.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Overall, the revised energy savings for all five reviewed projects were 30 percent below the tracked value. As for peak demand savings, they were increased by a ratio of 3.41. To establish...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report found that revised energy savings for five projects were 30% below tracked values, with peak demand savings increased by a ratio of 3.41. Savings were influenced by fuel-switching, which relies on participant declarations, and greenhouse gas emission reductions were not fully accounted for in the evaluation.
e Report Residential and Commercial/Industrial Lighting and HVAC Measures, June 2007. 15 Energy & Resource Solutions. Measure Life Study Report prepared for The Massachusetts Joint Utilities, 2005. Custom 34 Custom Incentives Program Effic...
AI summary The document presents a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom Incentives Program, focusing on revised gross energy and peak demand savings for new construction projects, including partial projects started in 2017 and multi-year projects.
1.060 1.064 1.064 - Gross Demand Savings – at Generator (MW) 1.007 1.194 0.319 2.520 6.2 Net-to-gross Ratio Because New Construction bases its savings on the difference between a participant-specific baseline (the hypothetical building tha...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of net savings for the New Construction program under the Custom Incentives Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explains that net savings are calculated using a net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) of 1.00, resulting in 5.751 GWh in net energy savings and 2.520 MW in net demand savings at the generator for 2017.
to be 1.00, net savings are equal to the gross savings presented in Table 14. For 2017, New Construction generated 5.751 GWh in net energy savings and 2.520 MW in net demand savings at the generator. Overall, using the Nova Scotia-specific...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from New Construction in 2017, calculating net energy and demand savings, and translating these into avoided CO2 emissions using a Nova Scotia-specific factor. It also mentions the Building Optimization Market Evaluation and participant feedback collected during on-site visits.
secase hours of operation were reduced to 50 percent of the time for only the cooling season (6 months). This adjustment had a significant impact, reducing this project’s energy savings by 37 percent. The other project whose energy savings...
AI summary The analysis discusses adjustments made to energy savings in three projects. The first project's savings were reduced by 37% due to reduced operation hours. The second project's savings were reduced by 28% due to seasonal variations in DHW load. The third project's savings were reduced by 7% due to adjustments in fan operation. The overall adjustment ratio was 0.807.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The Evaluator found that the scope of projects reviewed in 2017 varied widely. While some projects included a scoping study which relied on advanced metering methods to identify deep saving...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights variability in project scope, noting some projects focused on basic maintenance rather than full building optimization. The Evaluator adjusted basecase values to avoid overestimating savings and warned about potential free ridership. Interactive effects and effective useful life were also considered in the evaluation.
installed only a portion of the measures. Also, no participant had ever conducted any full commissioning project, except for one who did with the help of ENS, in another Building Optimization project. 8.3 Net Savings Since the NTGR is assu...
AI summary The report discusses the installation of energy efficiency measures in Building Optimization projects, noting that full commissioning has been limited. Net savings for 2017 are calculated as 0.836 GWh in energy savings and 0.071 MW in peak demand savings, resulting in 546 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually, using a Nova Scotia-specific emissions factor.
agement and an adequate level of expertise, and agree to complete all the stages of an EMIS project. EMIS can encompass an entire facility, or just specific processes or departments within a facility. Once approved, eligible participants m...
AI summary The document outlines the Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS) program, which requires participants to enter into an agreement with Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and complete an audit by a qualified professional. The program aims to achieve 4.0 GWh in net electricity savings and 0.1 MW in net peak demand savings by 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 13.2.1 Project Review Methodology In 2016, the Evaluator made a distinction between the cumulative energy savings tracked by ENS and incremental energy savings, and recommended that ENS tra...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the methodology used to evaluate energy savings from Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) projects, distinguishing between cumulative and incremental savings. The report focuses on incremental savings for impact evaluation, with cumulative savings presented for informational purposes. The Evaluator used M&V reports and EMIS data to assess peak demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report For three of the four projects, ENS provided the Evaluator with annual savings reports and corresponding EMIS savings calculation workbooks prepared by the service provider. As for the proj...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) provided evaluation documentation for DSM projects in 2017, including annual savings reports and EMIS workbooks. One project faced communication issues due to a failed virtual private network, leading to reliance on monthly Excel workbooks for energy savings reporting. The Evaluator used these workbooks to verify savings and calculate peak demand savings based on monthly data.
April 2014 N/A activity mode Controlling electricity consumption during the sanitation- None 2.2 April 2014 N/A 2 maintenance mode according to specific kilowatt targets Reducing unnecessary electricity load (such as hydraulic power None 2...
AI summary The text outlines various measures taken to reduce electricity consumption during different operational modes, including turning off non-essential equipment on weekends and adjusting processes based on production needs. These actions are part of energy efficiency initiatives aimed at reducing unnecessary load and optimizing energy use.
5 None N/A Change in raw material freeness May 2015 - Now Operational control of the heating elements for the each production Change in freeness due to 4 4.1 April 2014 lines using EMIS information freeness-analyzer May-June 2017 malfuncti...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy-efficiency projects under the Custom Incentives Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in 2017. It outlines the process of verifying tracked cumulative savings and adjusting baselines based on findings from the DSMDS and interviews with participants. No baseline adjustments were required as no projects affected the EMIS measurement boundaries.
t models would require baseline adjustments. The results of the interviews revealed that no projects affected the EMIS measurement boundaries, and therefore, no new baseline adjustments were required. In 2017, the Evaluator adjusted the re...
AI summary The text discusses adjustments to energy efficiency project savings due to changes in compressed air system performance from retrofit projects. No new baseline adjustments were required as projects did not affect EMIS measurement boundaries. An adjustment was made in 2017 for Project 3 due to equipment upgrades and changes in baseline consumption.
0.5 was applied to account for the shift-change mode, which only coincides with the peak demand period between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m., and a positive peak demand savings value was established at 16.6 kW. Overall, the cumulative savings tracked...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses energy savings tracked by EMIS, noting that some measures generated negative incremental savings. It also highlights the need for ENS to improve data collection through monthly logs and contract changes to ensure accurate tracking of program participation and equipment changes.
ndation, if properly implemented, will improve the results and facilitate identifying major equipment changes made between any two reporting dates. The Adjustments Made to Tracked Incremental Savings Incremental energy savings were tracked...
AI summary The document discusses adjustments made to tracked incremental savings for four EMIS projects. Projects 2 and 3 required recalculations by the Evaluator, resulting in an energy adjustment ratio of 0.89, while Projects 1 and 4 did not require adjustments as the service provider's calculations aligned with the participants’ processes.
re, the Evaluator suggests that ENS adopt an incremental baseline based on 2017 energy consumption data to establish 2018’s incremental savings results. Summary of Adjustments Made to Tracked Savings Table 20 and Table 21 below summarize t...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends that ENS use 2017 energy consumption data to establish an incremental baseline for calculating 2018’s incremental savings. Tables 20 and 21 summarize adjustments made to tracked cumulative and incremental savings of each EMIS project reviewed.
f incremental savings in EMIS has not been established based on measured values in the literature. The Evaluator therefore analyzed the available data to suggest a conservative yet realistic approach. Based on the 2017 evaluation results,...
AI summary The evaluation of EMIS (Energy Management Information Systems) found that incremental savings persist for participants, even when some measures show decreased performance. This persistence is attributed to either ENS (Efficiency Nova Scotia) support maintaining savings or the EMIS itself preventing decay in energy efficiency.
Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Advisory Group, Illinois Statewide Technical Reference Manual for Energy Efficiency Version 6.0, Volume 2: Commercial and Industrial Measures, February 8, 2017, p. 226. Energy Management Information System 61...
AI summary The text discusses the persistence of energy savings over time based on different decay rates, using a table that illustrates how savings decrease annually for various decay rates (50%, 25%, and 10%). This is part of an evaluation report on a custom incentives program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
vings (kWh) (kWh) 50% 25% 10% 1 1,000 1,000 - - - 2 1,500 500 - - - 3 1,750 250 - - - 4 2,000 250 - - - 5 0 0 1,000 1,500 1,800 6 0 0 500 1,125 1,620 7 0 0 250 844 1,458 8 0 0 125 633 1,312 9 0 0 63 475 1,181 10 0 0 31 356 1,063 TOTAL 6,25...
AI summary The table presents energy savings data across different participation levels, showing the distribution of savings in kWh for various percentages (50%, 25%, and 10%). It also includes the Effective Useful Life (EUL) after the end of participation, indicating the longevity of these savings.
0.137 MW 0.137 MW 1.00 0.137 MW Evaluation Results 0.137 MW 0.255 MW 1.00 0.255 MW In 2017, the Evaluator did not adjust the incremental savings of the two projects for which a proper incremental baseline approach was used by the service p...
AI summary The evaluation of energy savings from projects in 2017 showed a 20 percent reduction due to changes in the approach used for calculating incremental savings. The Nova Scotia-specific factor was derived from Nova Scotia Power’s 2016 emissions and generation data. The document references the Energy Management Information System and the Custom Incentives Program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report CONCLUSION The Custom Incentives program is comprised of one well-established program component (Custom) and two relatively new program components (EMIS and SEM). The Custom Incentives prog...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia shows that the Custom Incentives program achieved its peak demand savings target but fell short of its energy savings goal. The Custom program component, which includes Retrofit, New Construction, and Building Optimization, achieved 21.005 GWh in net energy savings and 3.637 MW in net peak demand savings in 2017.
. Altogether, these services generated 21.005 GWh in net energy savings and 3.637 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2017, with 78 projects generating savings and 58 projects completed. The 2017 evaluation has included a tec...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation of energy efficiency services in Nova Scotia showed 21.005 GWh in net energy savings and 3.637 MW in net peak demand savings. Improvements in documentation led to a closer adjustment ratio for Retrofit services, though some projects had insufficient M&V activities. Overall, adjustments reduced ENS’s tracked value by 9 percent, with positive feedback on the Retrofit service and BDM’s support.
ong the consultants and participants, as well as BDM’s role in promoting the service, supporting the participants throughout their application process and extending participation to new industries. Custom Incentives Program 68 Custom Incen...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS) program, noting that seven participants were selected, with only four reporting savings due to the new participants not having generated savings by the end of 2017. The report focuses on incremental energy savings, achieving 1.402 GWh in net energy savings and 0.255 MW in net peak demand savings.
c. This showed that a systematic review should be conducted, even if energy models are prepared by experienced consultants. The Evaluator also recommends that ENS provide tools and training to their staff so that they are better able to co...
AI summary The text discusses the need for systematic reviews of energy models and the importance of providing tools and training to ENS staff to improve technical reviews. It also highlights the varying objectives and scopes of Building Optimization projects and the need to clearly define project goals.
w Findings observed on site but had not been identified in the project documentation provided by ENS. The Evaluator recommends that ENS implement a Project No. 6138 2 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – A...
AI summary The evaluation of the Custom Incentives Program identifies issues with documentation and data tracking in the DSMDS. It recommends implementing a change-tracking document and specifying effective useful life (EUL) values for each project. Adjustments are also needed in calculating electricity consumption for new construction projects.
to increase savings Q8, Q10, Q32 Address interactions of BDMs with consultants Q6c, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23 Programmer Information Programming note style conventions in this document: › [PROGRAMMING] Programming instructions are in bracketed CA...
AI summary The Custom – Retrofit program provides incentives for commercial and industrial customers to reduce electrical consumption and demand through energy audits and implementation of efficient measures. The program includes two retrofit tracks and is part of Efficiency Nova Scotia's broader offerings.
2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Instrument Introduction Name: Response Company: Response Date: Response Interviewer: Response Script for Initial Phone Call or Voicemail Hi, this is from Research Into Action. I am on an evaluation tea...
AI summary This document outlines the process evaluation of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Custom-Retrofit program, conducted by Research Into Action on behalf of ENS. The evaluation involves interviews with stakeholders to assess the program's implementation and effectiveness.
vide the audio or notes to Efficiency Nova Scotia, unless legally required to do so.] Is it ok that I record the interview? Do you have any questions before we get started? Roles and Responsibilities Q1. Let’s start with a bit about you. C...
AI summary The text outlines a series of interview questions for a participant in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom Incentives Program, focusing on their role, experience with the program, and outreach methods. It includes questions about project numbers, sources of leads, and customer interest in the program.
g eligibility for your customers. 1 What problems or issues, if any, have you faced? 2 What has worked well for you? 3 What problems or issues, if any, have your customers faced? Project No. 6138 6 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions related to the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the evaluation of the 2017 DSM (Demand Side Management) initiative. It explores challenges and successes at various stages, including scoping studies, feasibility studies, implementation, and the M&V (Monitoring and Verification) phase.
your customers? 5 How satisfied are you with the M&V tools provided by ENS? What makes you satisfied or dissatisfied with the tools? What could be improved? What should not be changed? Q17. What reasons do customers most often give when th...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions directed at customers regarding their satisfaction with M&V tools provided by ENS, reasons for abandoning projects, and strategies used to encourage project completion. It also explores the working relationship with Efficiency Nova Scotia and the role of Business Development Managers in referrals.
bout possible ways to increase # of projects Q27, Q28, Q32 Inquire about possible ways to increase savings Q27, Q28 Programmer Information Programming note style conventions in this document: › [PROGRAMMING] Programming instructions are in...
AI summary The document discusses the Custom – Retrofit program, which provides incentives for commercial and industrial customers to reduce energy consumption through energy audits and efficient measures. The program includes two retrofit tracks and is part of Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation.
duction Name: Response Company: Response Date: Response Interviewer: Response Script for Initial Phone Call or Voicemail Hi, this is from Research Into Action. As you may know, we are part of the evaluation team for Efficiency Nova Scotia’...
AI summary This document outlines a script for an initial phone call or voicemail from Research Into Action to participants of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Custom-Retrofit program. The purpose is to gather feedback to improve the program. The script includes an introduction, explanation of the evaluation process, and a request for participation in a 30-minute interview.
ave an idea of how extensive it would be? For example, you may have started out wanting to do a lighting project and then opted to complete other measures such as HVAC. Program Services In general, there are five key phases of a Custom pro...
AI summary The text outlines the five key phases of a Custom Incentives Program project, including confirming eligibility, scoping study, feasibility study, implementation, and approval with verification of savings. It also asks for feedback on challenges, successes, and suggestions for improvement during each phase, as well as communication with consultants.
sfied have you been with Efficiency Nova Scotia in terms of providing you with the service and support you needed to complete your Custom project? Why? Opportunities, Successes, and Challenges Q27. Do you have any plans to do additional Cu...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions regarding participation in the Custom-Retrofit program, focusing on experiences, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. It also references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Appendix Report that outlines the on-site visit protocol for the Retrofit program.
s the protocol used as part of the Retrofit on-site visits. On-site Visit Protocol After reviewing the 2016 Retrofit protocol, the Evaluator considered it still appropriate for the 2017 site visits. The on-site protocol form was used by th...
AI summary The document outlines the on-site visit protocol used for Retrofit projects under the Custom Incentives Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in 2017. It describes the data collection process, including reviewing technical documents and using a standardized form to collect information on building systems and energy efficiency measures.
t was the most important challenge or barrier? _ S6. Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the New Construction Program? Consider all aspects of the program: Participation process, program forms, marketing, interactions with ENS st...
AI summary The text presents a section from a regulatory proceeding related to the New Construction Program under the Custom Incentives Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes a data-collection form for reviewing energy models and simulation model review protocols.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report CUSTOM: BUILDING OPTIMIZATION ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL This appendix describes the protocol used as part of the Building Optimization on-site visits. On-site Visit Protocol The pro...
AI summary This appendix outlines the on-site visit protocol used by Efficiency Nova Scotia for the Building Optimization program in the 2017 DSM Evaluation. It includes a pre-visit assessment and data collection procedures, such as reviewing project documents, system details, and building automation system data.
rations. The compilation involved summarizing the proposed energy-efficiency measures and the associated baseline used for each measure. On-site Validation of the Measures Implemented in the Building For the 2017 New Construction review, t...
AI summary The document describes the on-site validation process for energy-efficiency measures in the 2017 New Construction review. The Evaluator visited four out of five projects to confirm that proposed measures were installed and operational, and to assess participant satisfaction and building operations. Discrepancies identified were used to adjust energy consumption and demand savings estimates for each project.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report CUSTOM: RETROFIT CALCULATION EXAMPLE This appendix provides a sample of the calculations used to adjust the energy savings results for one of the projects reviewed as part of the...
AI summary This appendix provides an example of how energy savings from a tank insulation project were calculated and adjusted during the 2017 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation. The calculation involved comparing steady-state heat loss with and without insulation, using data from emails and an Excel workbook.
Table 3: Tank Insulation Variables and Tracked Savings Values Variable Unit Value Abase ft2 292 Surface area of the storage tank prior to adding the tank wrap Ainsul ft2 314 Surface area of the storage tank after addition of the tank wrap...
AI summary This table outlines the variables and tracked savings values related to tank insulation, including surface area, heat transfer coefficients, temperature setpoints, and energy savings. The revised savings calculation highlights the impact of adding a tank wrap on energy efficiency.
kWh 62,261 Peak demand savings kW 0 Revised Savings Calculation Adjustments to the energy savings were made based on data found by the Evaluator during the on-site visit. A temperature sensor attached to the tank displayed 24.4°C at the ti...
AI summary The document discusses a revised energy savings calculation for a project, based on corrected temperature data. The original savings estimate assumed a tank temperature of 36°C, but on-site evaluation found the actual temperature to be 24.4°C, leading to an adjustment in the savings calculation.
Sections Recommendations 1 Ensure that the tracking sheet is complete and accurate. While reviewing the project documentation, the Evaluator found several discrepancies between the savings figures reported in the final tracking sheet and t...
AI summary The Evaluator identified discrepancies between the final tracking sheet and annual reports, and noted the absence of peak demand savings tracking. It also found that changes in production levels, such as increased weekend production time, affected energy savings calculations. The Evaluator recommends improving tracking and planning M&V activities to account for operational changes.
48 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Project No. 6138 49 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Project No. 6138 50 Custom Incentives Prog...
AI summary The document discusses the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes abbreviations and project details, indicating an evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives and their impact.
vings. This value takes into account variations in useful life annual energy savings throughout the effective useful life due to increased baselines. Direct Installation Program iii Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 D...
AI summary The document is a 2017 evaluation report on the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on energy savings and the effective useful life of installed equipment.
Gross and net savings calculated by the Evaluator using the parameters (unitary savings values, installation rates, interactive effects, net-to-gross Evaluated savings ratio, etc.) validated or measured during the evaluation process. Unles...
AI summary The text outlines key terms and definitions related to energy efficiency program evaluations, including gross and net savings, free-ridership, induced consumption, and interactive effects. It also describes the evaluation plan and first-year savings as critical components of assessing program effectiveness.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2017 demand-side management (DSM) evaluation of the Direct Installation program, which is comprised of only one program component,...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report assesses the Direct Installation program, specifically the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) component. It outlines participation levels, gross and net savings for the audit and DIY paths, based on interviews, surveys, and on-site visits.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Small Business Energy Solutions SBES offers incentives and resources to Nova Scotia’s small businesses to encourage them to make smart energy-efficient upgrades at their facilities. To be e...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report details the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, which provides incentives and resources for small businesses in Nova Scotia to make energy-efficient upgrades. Eligibility is based on annual energy usage, and participants can choose between an audit path or a DIY path. The report also mentions the Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot, which is similar to SBES but targets affordable housing.
ilot, which offers measures similar to other SBES projects, but bases its eligibility criterion on affordable housing rather than an energy consumption requirement. SBES Key Findings SBES Performance SBES aimed to achieve net electricity s...
AI summary The SBES program aimed to achieve significant energy and peak demand savings in 2017, with actual results slightly below targets. It achieved 7.887 GWh in net energy savings and 1.363 MW in net peak demand savings, equivalent to 5,151 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emissions avoided. Most projects were implemented via the DIY path, contributing to 87% of implemented projects and 80% of total savings.
its inception in 2015,2 and clearly illustrates SBES’s steady increase in participation level and the associated savings. Figure 1: Overview of SBES Performance, 2015-2017 Number of Projects Net Savings 417 7.887 259 4.120 0.025 0.016 0.01...
AI summary The document highlights the success of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program from 2015 to 2017, showing an increase in participation and energy savings. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the program, particularly with the equipment and audit services, though a few had concerns about incentives and energy savings.
m of the auditor and usefulness of the audit. The other few participants who were less satisfied indicated dissatisfaction with the amount of the incentive (n=2) and the energy savings achieved (n=2). When asked to rate the predetermined f...
AI summary The evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program found that participants were generally satisfied with the audit process but had concerns about incentive amounts and energy savings. Financial challenges and lack of knowledge were cited as main barriers. Suggestions for improvement included better promotion, improved communication, and increasing rebate amounts.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report SBES Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed ENS’s gross savings estimates by conducting a desk review using the information contained in the tracking system, the CIRx Screening Tool and the...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report reviewed Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy savings estimates, identifying discrepancies due to mismatched operating conditions. Adjustment ratios for energy and peak demand savings were calculated, and a net-to-gross ratio was determined after assessing free-ridership and spillover effects from the SBES program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The evaluated net energy savings are 10 percent below the corresponding tracked figure. This is mainly due to the adjustment made to the gross savings, since the 2017 evaluated NTGR was sli...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report found that evaluated net energy savings were 10% below tracked figures, primarily due to adjustments in gross savings and discrepancies in lighting measures. Evaluated net peak demand savings were 24% lower than tracked values, mainly due to revised peak coincidence factors for lighting measures. SBES performed well with increased participation and satisfaction, and the Evaluator provided recommendations for improvement.
moving forward on the right track and further improve its performance and effectiveness, the Evaluator has the following recommendations to make. These recommendations can also be found in Appendix I. 2017 SBES-R1. Implement an internal pr...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) implement an internal procedure to thoroughly review complex custom projects to ensure accurate savings calculations. This is necessary due to the specialized technical knowledge required for validating savings from such projects, especially since they often represent the largest savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 2017 SBES-R2. Closely monitor the new lighting application forms’ effectiveness to confirm that they are achieving their intended goals. Following last year’s recommendations, ENS developed...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) developed new lighting application forms in 2017 to improve savings estimates. These forms were not used until January 2018, so their impact could not be assessed in the 2017 report. However, similarities between this year and last year suggest the new forms may improve accuracy if properly used. ENS is advised to monitor form usage and ensure peak coincidence factor calculations align with system peak demand periods.
2017 SBES-R3. Investigate new ways to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures to increase their share of savings and ultimately increase SBES’s total savings. Although SBES offers a wide variety of measures, lighting retrofit...
AI summary The 2017 SBES-R3 report highlights that lighting retrofits account for 80% of SBES’s total gross savings, primarily due to ease of implementation and participant knowledge gaps. The Evaluator suggests exploring new marketing and educational materials, using project analyses for success stories, and providing additional support to non-audit path participants to increase the implementation of non-lighting energy-efficiency measures.
t path, for instance by having an ENS staff member follow up to help them consider non-lighting measures if the facility includes other large energy-consuming equipment. Direct Installation Program xiii Direct Installation Program Efficien...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), a franchise held by EfficiencyOne, is responsible for delivering energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. ENS receives funding from Nova Scotia Power and the Province of Nova Scotia for its activities, which include reducing electricity consumption and helping low-income households reduce the use of other fuels. Econoler was commissioned to evaluate ENS’s 2017 demand-side management programs and assess the impact of energy efficiency codes and standards in Nova Scotia.
fficiency codes and standards introduced in Nova Scotia. To carry out this assignment, Econoler collaborated with Research Into Action, Equilibrium Engineering and Corporate Research Associates (CRA). Econoler served as team leader in the...
AI summary The document describes an evaluation of energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia conducted in 2017 by Econoler, Research Into Action, Equilibrium Engineering, and CRA. The evaluation covered various programs, including their components and types of evaluations performed, with a reduction in scope compared to 2016.
Residential Efficient Product Appliance Retirement C C R Rebates Program Instant Savings C C R R Home Energy C C C C Assessment Existing Residential Program Green Heat C C C C C Efficient Product C C C C Installation New Residential Progra...
AI summary The document outlines various residential and business energy efficiency programs, including rebate programs, home energy assessments, and custom incentive programs. It highlights initiatives such as the Efficient Product Appliance Retirement Rebates, Instant Savings, and the Business Energy Rebates Program.
irect Installation Program C C C C C Solutions The process evaluation specifically targets the Retrofit service of the Custom program component. Due to the start date of the latest Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, SEM did not have...
AI summary This document outlines the evaluation of the Direct Installation Program, specifically focusing on the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) component. It provides an overview of the program, its eligibility criteria, and notes that no evaluation was conducted for 2017 due to the lack of participants achieving savings.
es must use less than 350,000 kWh annually. Businesses with annual electricity consumption higher than this limit are directed towards ENS’s Custom or Business Energy Rebates (BER) program components. All SBES participants must first compl...
AI summary The document outlines the eligibility criteria and participation process for the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, including the audit path and DIY path. Businesses must complete a business profile and may receive a free energy audit or choose to self-assess. Contractors and upgrades must be approved by ENS.
. 2016 SBES-R5. Identify those SBEAs who are qualified to conduct audits at industrial Implemented facilities. All five 2016 recommendations made for SBES have either been implemented or are in the process of being implemented. In accordan...
AI summary The 2016 SBES-R5 recommendation focuses on identifying qualified SBEAs to conduct audits at industrial facilities. ENS has implemented several improvements to the Opportunities Report and offers training and marketing support to contractors to enhance the SBES program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Other improvements and modifications were also brought to this program component this year in order to facilitate the auditors’ work and better align their qualifications with the facilitie...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) made several improvements to its Demand Side Management (DSM) program in 2017, including developing cost estimates for lighting measures, categorizing auditors into tiers, and revising application forms to improve savings calculations for DIY projects. These changes were implemented based on recommendations from the 2016 SBES report.
2018. The Evaluator expects the impact of this change to show in the 2018 impact evaluation, since new forms had not yet been made available to the participants visited as part of the 2017 evaluation. 1.3 Participation History SBES was ini...
AI summary The SBES program, launched in 2015, saw a significant increase in participation and energy savings between 2016 and 2017, with a 79% increase in gross energy savings and 61% increase in the number of projects. In 2017, 417 projects were completed, including 50 audit-path and 367 DIY-path projects.
levels increased, with the audit-path projects accounting for about 12 percent of the total number of projects this year. Figure 4: Overview of Participation in SBES, 2015-2017 Number of Projects 450 0.028 0.030 400 0.021 0.025 350 0.019 3...
AI summary The text discusses participation and gross savings from the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program from 2015 to 2017. It highlights that audit-path projects accounted for about 12 percent of the total number of projects in the most recent year covered.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Figure 5: Summary of Gross Savings for SBES, 2015-2017 Gross Energy Savings (GWh) Gross Peak Demand Savings (MW) 7.401 1.273 1.129 4.304 1.116 0.681 1.519 0.194 0.166 0.266 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 DIY Path...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that lighting projects were the most common measure category in the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, accounting for about 80% of total gross savings. In the audit path, the percentage of savings from lighting projects increased significantly from 20% in 2016 to 48% in 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report A total of 50 SBES projects were reviewed, including 35 DIY path projects and 15 audit path projects. These project reviews and visits were conducted to validate whether the measures implem...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report reviewed 50 SBES projects, including on-site visits and validation of energy efficiency measures. Adjustments to gross savings were made based on findings, and an effective useful life review was conducted using technical references to evaluate ENS's calculations.
nt scale) SBES overall 8.8 Equipment that was installed (n=70) 9.4 Helpfulness of your contractor in completing 8.9 the application and worksheet (n=68) Ease of finding a contractor (n=65) 8.8 Professionalism of the energy auditor (n=20) 8...
AI summary Participants rated various aspects of the Small Business Energy Solutions program with scores ranging from 8.4 to 9.4. Financial challenges were identified as the primary barrier to installing energy efficiency upgrades, rated at 5.3 on a 10-point scale, followed by lack of knowledge about incentives and equipment at 4.2.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Figure 8: Barriers to Installing Energy Efficiency Upgrades (10-point scale) Financial challenge, even after rebate, such as lack of funds, taking too long to recoup the investment, etc. 5....
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia highlights barriers to installing energy efficiency upgrades, such as financial challenges, lack of knowledge about incentives, and time constraints. Participants also provided feedback on improving the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including better promotion, communication, and increasing rebate amounts.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 4 SBES IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2017 SBES impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. This section discusses the gross and n...
AI summary The 2017 SBES impact evaluation assesses gross and net energy and peak demand savings from the Small Business Energy Solutions program. Five site visits were conducted with three SBEA companies, using an updated audit protocol that categorizes projects and auditors into three tiers based on complexity.
•Industrial Tier 3 •Agricultural •Custom measures •Can also include Tier 1 and 2 Of the five audits sampled, two were classified as Tier 1, one as Tier 2 and two as Tier 3. The three SBEAs with whom the Evaluator conducted visits were all...
AI summary The document discusses the qualifications and procedures followed by Small Business Energy Auditors (SBEAs) in conducting audits for the Small Business Energy Solutions program. It highlights the experience of the auditors, the use of standard operating procedures (SOPs), and the adoption of an audit checklist to ensure consistency and comprehensiveness in audits.
audit checklist developed by the Washington State University6 to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness of audits. The SBEAs are free to use this checklist and adapt it at their own discretion. Regarding the methodology used to prep...
AI summary The audit process conducted by Small Business Energy Auditors (SBEAs) varies in methodology and thoroughness. Some SBEAs use basic tools like cellphones for documentation, while others use more professional equipment. Additionally, some SBEAs failed to identify compressed air systems, potentially missing energy-saving opportunities.
in duty is to identify potential energy-saving opportunities, their failure to notice the air compressors installed and used on site, means that additional energy-saving opportunities were overlooked. Overall, all SBEAs conducted their aud...
AI summary The evaluation report highlights that while SBEAs conducted audits professionally, they missed identifying air compressors on site, leading to overlooked energy-saving opportunities. The report suggests implementing a checklist during initial interviews to ensure all equipment is documented.
The Evaluator reviewed ENS’s gross savings estimates by conducting a desk review using the information contained in the tracking system, the CIRx Screening Tool and the findings of the on-site visits. In 2017, the SBES tracking sheet recor...
AI summary The Evaluator assessed ENS’s gross savings estimates using a desk review and on-site visits. In 2017, 1,823 measures were implemented across 10 categories, with lighting measures making up 94% of the total. A stratified sampling approach was used due to lighting's dominance in savings. Adjustments to baseline wattage, efficient wattage, and annual hours of use were noted.
2017 evaluation, it should be noted that the tracked baseline wattages were correctly documented for 80 percent of all the lighting measures, a small improvement over the 76 percent observed in 2016. In comparison, the efficient wattage wa...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation showed that 80% of lighting measures had correctly documented baseline wattages, slightly up from 2016. Efficient wattage was correctly tracked for 72% of measures, with common errors involving LED tube wattages. Adjustments to HOU were needed for about half the sample due to discrepancies in application paperwork, changing business operations, and incorrect scheduling.
uring sectors. Third, the applicant or the contractor applies a single facility schedule to an operation that involves several sub-schedules, like the schedule of a warehouse connected with an office. The peak coincidence factor (PCF) valu...
AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of energy efficiency measures, focusing on the peak coincidence factor (PCF) adjustments made in 2017. Modifications to PCF values were made based on verified facility operating schedules, with some adjustments resulting in lower peak demand savings ratios. The evaluation process showed only minor differences from previous years.
0.013 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.167 1.594 Savings Adjustment Ratio 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 Total Gross Energy Savings - at 0.684 0.508 0.035 0.000 0.008 0.011 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.148 1.417 the Meter (GWh...
AI summary The text presents numerical data related to energy savings, including Gross Energy Savings at the Meter and Generator, Effective Useful Life, and Peak Demand Savings. The data includes factors such as Savings Adjustment Ratios and Line Loss Factors, indicating a focus on energy efficiency and demand-side management metrics.
Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy Savings – 0.684 0.508 0.035 0.000 0.008 0.011 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.148 1.417 at the Meter (GWh) NTGR 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 - Net Energy Savings – at the 0.637 0.472 0.032 0.000...
AI summary The text presents data on energy savings and peak demand savings, including revised gross and net energy savings at the meter and generator, average effective useful life, and net lifetime energy savings. The data is presented in numerical form with various factors such as NTGR and line loss factor applied.
Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy 6.001 0.705 0.000 0.005 0.151 0.012 0.000 0.005 0.001 0.028 6.907 Savings – at the Meter (GWh) NTGR 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 - Net Energy Savings – at the 5.221 0.645 0.000 0.004...
AI summary The text presents tables detailing energy savings and peak demand savings at various points in the energy system, including at the meter, generator, and net lifetime savings. It includes metrics such as Effective Useful Life (EUL) and Line Loss Factor, which are used to calculate overall energy efficiency and savings.
ENS Tracked Savings 2.068 MW 2.068 MW 0.87 1.804 MW Evaluation Results 2.068 MW 1.538 MW 0.89 1.363 MW The evaluated net energy savings are 10 percent below the corresponding tracked figure. This is mainly due to the adjustment made to the...
AI summary The evaluated net energy savings are 10% below tracked figures, primarily due to adjustments in gross savings influenced by higher 2017 NTGR values. Net peak demand savings are 24% lower due to revised peak coincidence factors for lighting measures. These adjustments were identified during site visits and affected lighting-related discrepancies.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report CONCLUSIONS SBES was launched in mid-2015 to replace BES, so 2017 marked SBES’s second full year of operation. Even though participation nearly doubled and reached a new high, it was not su...
AI summary SBES achieved 7.887 GWh in total net energy savings and 1.363 MW in peak demand savings in 2017, falling short of its 8.8 GWh and 1.9 MW targets. Participation nearly doubled, and satisfaction was high, but non-lighting measures have untapped potential for future savings.
ave quite some untapped potential for achieving future energy and peak demand savings through SBES and therefore suggests looking for new ways to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures. The Evaluator also found that there wa...
AI summary The text discusses the potential for energy and peak demand savings through the Southwestern Nova Scotia Energy Services (SBES) program and highlights the need for improved tracking of savings, particularly from complex custom projects. It also mentions efforts by ENS to improve data collection and monitoring of program performance.
eam to seek assistance from the Custom Incentive Program’s personnel, who already have the skills and expertise needed for reviewing this type of project. 2. Closely monitor the new lighting application forms’ effectiveness to confirm that...
AI summary The document discusses the need to involve the Custom Incentive Program’s personnel in reviewing projects and monitoring the effectiveness of new lighting application forms developed by ENS to improve savings calculation accuracy. It highlights the need for careful use of these forms, particularly in relation to peak demand savings calculations.
that the daily operating schedule coincides with the system peak demand period, since the Evaluator found multiple cases where adjustments were required. 3. Investigate new ways to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures to i...
AI summary The text discusses the need to investigate new ways to encourage non-lighting energy efficiency measures, as lighting retrofits account for most of SBES’s savings. It highlights a lack of knowledge about equipment as a barrier to implementing more complex technologies.
e by having an ENS staff member follow up to help them consider non-lighting measures if the facility includes other large energy-consuming equipment. 2016 4. Consider working with auditors to make the process of developing cost Recommenda...
AI summary The text outlines recommendations for improving the efficiency of the Direct Installation Program by involving ENS staff in helping participants consider non-lighting energy measures and by working with auditors to streamline the cost estimation process. It also mentions the distribution of the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Certified Commercial Kitchen Equipment to ensure accurate input variables.
PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1 Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2 No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] Introduction Hello, my name is _ and I am calling from Corporate Research Associa...
AI summary This document is a participant survey questionnaire conducted by Corporate Research Associates on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia to evaluate the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. The survey aims to gather feedback from businesses that participated in the program to help improve its services and offerings.
hat energy efficiency be considered when purchasing equipment 1. YES 2. NO 8. (DON’T KNOW) 9. (Refused) Verification and Recall (Series V) V1. a. [READ IF PROJECT QTY=1] According to our information, through its participation in the Small...
AI summary The text discusses the installation of energy efficiency upgrades in a facility through the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, including rebate and financing details. It is part of a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report related to the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Participation (Series P) P1. Regarding your organization’s decision to apply for the Small Business Energy Solutions incentive program, who initiated the discussion about this in...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to participation in the Small Business Energy Solutions incentive program and free-ridership for audit path projects. It asks who initiated the discussion about the program and whether participants had plans to install energy-efficient upgrades before being evaluated.
sion to install [all/some of] the energy efficiency upgrades that were installed as part of the program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Project No. 6138 5 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation of the 2017 Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It asks participants whether they would have paid for energy-efficient upgrades without the rebate and financing provided by the program.
hood that you would have postponed making energy efficient upgrades to your facility by at least one year? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Project No. 6138 6 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Ap...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the influence of various factors on the decision to install energy-efficient upgrades, including free audits, program rebates, and information from Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also asks about the postponement of energy-efficient upgrades.
Refused a contractor g. The availability of a list of contractors _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused through the Efficiency Trade Network Free-Ridership for DIY Path (Series FR-M1 and FR-M2) INSTRUCTION: RESPONDENTS WILL BE ASKED ABOUT...
AI summary The document outlines a survey related to free-ridership for the DIY Path under the Efficiency Trade Network, focusing on lighting upgrades rebated or financed through the Small Business Energy Solutions Program. Respondents are asked whether they decided to install energy-efficient lighting before learning about the program.
ogram, you had already made the decision to install the energy-efficient lighting upgrades? [CODE ONE ONLY] 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) FR2-M1. a. [IF FINANCING=NO] Efficiency Nova Scotia provided your organization with a r...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to energy-efficient lighting upgrades, including whether the respondent had already decided to install them, the impact of rebates and financing, and awareness of certified lighting products.
the likelihood that you would have postponed installing the lighting upgrades by at least one year? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused FR4-M1. Next, I’m going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the timing of lighting upgrades and factors influencing the decision to install energy-efficient lighting, including program rebates, on-bill financing, and information from Efficiency Nova Scotia and contractors. It is part of an evaluation of the 2017 Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
nswer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that it is “Very Unlikely,” and a 10 indicating that it is “Very Likely.” [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE – POSE FR3-M2 a,c SEQUENCE IN ORDER/DO NOT RANDOMIZE] FR3a-M2. If the program rebate or finan...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the influence of a rebate or financing program on the installation of energy-efficient HVAC upgrades. It asks participants to rate the likelihood of installing the same upgrades without the program and the importance of various factors in their decision to install them.
_ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused Nova Scotia’s staff. d. Information or advice provided by a contractor _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused e. The availability of a list of contractors through _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused t...
AI summary The text includes questions from a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report, focusing on the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It asks about previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and their influence on decisions to install energy-efficient upgrades.
gram was a major factor in the decision to install energy-efficient upgrades in your facility. 1. Agree 2. Disagree 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) CI2b. [IF CI1=1 and FR1-AU=1 OR FR1-AU=2 OR FR1-M1=1 OR FR1-M2=1] Because of your company’s...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to participation in energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the impact of previous involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs on decision-making regarding energy-efficient upgrades and awareness of promotional materials.
benefits of energy efficiency? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) For the following statements, please indicate whether you agree or disagree. CI4a. [IF CI3=1] The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the benefits of energy efficiency and satisfaction with the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. Questions assess the influence of promotional materials on decisions to implement energy efficiency measures and overall satisfaction with the program.
completing the application and worksheet e. The equipment that was installed f. The various steps you had to take to get through the program Barriers and Recommendations [B Series] A9. Generally speaking, how much of a barrier, if any, are...
AI summary The text outlines barriers to installing energy efficiency upgrades, including financial challenges, time constraints, and lack of knowledge about incentives and equipment. It also references a Direct Installation Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia as part of a 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report.
- 14% R2. Which of the following, if any, does your company have in place at [FACILITY NAME] FACILITY? Processes in Place in Facilities Where Measures 2016 2017 Were Implemented Sample Size 37 70 Yes No/Don’t know Yes No/Don’t know A perso...
AI summary The text provides data on energy usage monitoring and energy efficiency policies in facilities where measures were implemented in 2016 and 2017. It also references a Small Business Energy Solutions incentive program and its application process.
in preventing your organization from installing energy efficiency upgrades? Please answer on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 means ‘not at all a barrier’ and 10 means ‘a major barrier’. 2017 Barriers to Implementation Sample Mean Size Financia...
AI summary The text presents survey results about barriers to energy efficiency upgrades and customer satisfaction with the SBES program. Respondents rated financial challenges as the highest barrier, while overall satisfaction with the program remained high in both 2016 and 2017.
who would not likely have paid or financed the cost of the energy-efficient upgrades they installed in absence of SBES (FR2-AU a or b ≥5) Base: Respondents who installed more than one measure Project No. 6138 22 Direct Installation Program...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of various factors on the decision to install energy-efficient upgrades, with a focus on the Direct Installation Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It references SBES and the importance of financial assistance in enabling such upgrades.
here 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the importance of each of the following in your organization’s decision to install the energy- efficient upgrades: 2016 2017 Influence on Decision to Install Energy-ef...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the influence of various factors on the decision of organizations to install energy-efficient upgrades, focusing on program rebates, audits, and information provided by contractors and ENS staff. It also includes a question about whether organizations had already decided to install lighting upgrades before learning about the Small Business Energy Solutions Program.
bate for the energy-efficient lighting upgrades. If your organization had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid the full cost of the lighting upgrades? FR2-M1. b [IF REBATE and FINANCING=YES] Efficiency N...
AI summary The text asks respondents about their willingness to pay for energy-efficient lighting upgrades without rebates or financing, and whether they were aware of the certification of lighting products under the Small Business Energy Solution Program.
6 5 Don’t know/Refused - 1 FR2-M2.a. Efficiency Nova Scotia provided your organization with a rebate for the energy-efficient HVAC upgrades. If your organization had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid...
AI summary The text presents survey results on whether organizations would have paid for energy-efficient HVAC upgrades without rebates or financing from Efficiency Nova Scotia. The mean responses in 2016 and 2017 indicate that organizations were less likely to have paid the full cost without financial assistance.
to 10, where 0 means “No influence” and 10 means “Great influence”, please rate the importance of each of the following in your decision to install the energy-efficient HVAC upgrades: 2016 2017 Influence on Decision to Install Energy-effic...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the influence of various factors on customers' decisions to install energy-efficient HVAC upgrades. It highlights the impact of program on-bill financing, rebates, and information provided by ENS staff and contractors. The data is compared between 2016 and 2017 samples.
6 4.2 8 3.0 Trade Network Don’t know/refused removed from calculations Base: Respondents who received financing Base: Respondents who received a rebate Project No. 6138 27 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluat...
AI summary The text presents survey data on participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, specifically focusing on previous participation in other ENS programs and its influence on the decision to install energy-efficient upgrades. The data shows an increase in participation from 2016 to 2017.
11% 4% CI2a. Your company’s previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program was a major factor in the decision to install energy-efficient upgrades in your facility. 2016 2017 Previous Participation in Another ENS Program Compo...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) program on a company's decision to implement energy-efficient upgrades and consider energy efficiency measures before joining the Small Business Energy Solutions program. It includes survey responses from 2016 and 2017.
in that program, you had already considered implementing energy efficiency measures in your facility before participating in Small Business Energy Solutions. 2017 Impact of Previous ENS Program Component Participation (#) Sample Size 11 Ag...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) program on a company's decision-making regarding energy efficiency upgrades. It highlights that prior participation influenced the company's evaluation of cost-effective options for facility improvements.
by participating in that program, a company representative took into account the cost-effectiveness of energy efficient upgrades when evaluating different options for the facility. 2016 2017 Impact of Previous ENS Program Component Partici...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of previous participation in ENS programs and the awareness of energy efficiency promotional materials. It highlights that a majority of respondents agreed on the cost-effectiveness of energy-efficient upgrades and that most had previously seen ENS promotional materials.
11% 7% Don’t know/Refused - 1% CI4a. The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia were a major factor in your company’s decision to install energy-efficient upgrades. Impact of Previously Seen ENS Energ...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia on customer decisions to install energy-efficient upgrades and consider energy efficiency measures before participating in the Small Business Energy Solutions program. Survey data from 2016 and 2017 shows a significant increase in agreement from 48% to 64%.
als distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted you to consider implementing energy efficiency measures in your facility before participating in Small Business Energy Solutions. 2017 Impact of Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promo...
AI summary The promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia influenced respondents to consider energy efficiency measures and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of upgrades for their facilities. The data includes responses from 2016 and 2017, with a sample size of 17 in 2017.
t the site. Cooling System #1 Cooling System #2 % of Cooling Type of System Notes: 3. Facility Operation Hours and Lighting Usage Facility Occupancy Schedule: Please fill the table below for each different occupancy schedule. Business Busi...
AI summary The text outlines forms and tables related to facility operation hours, lighting usage, and measure information for an energy efficiency project. It includes sections for occupancy schedules, lighting operation schedules, and a tracking sheet for lighting measures under the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report What is VSD using as feedback mechanism? (VSD either modulates speed through a range or at fixed setpoints): Specify the hp of the motor controlled by the VSDs: Specify the type...
AI summary The document includes forms and data collection templates related to energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) and Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems. It requests details on VSD usage, motor horsepower, equipment types, hours of use, and manufacturer information, as well as data on the number of heat pumps and other heating and cooling systems.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Existing Existing Existing New New New HVAC 1 HVAC 2 HVAC 3 HVAC 1 HVAC 2 HVAC 3 Hours of use for equipment (Indicate the corresponding schedule number for each section): Heating...
AI summary The document provides forms and data collection templates related to energy efficiency programs, including HVAC systems and water heating, under the Direct Installation Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes fields for equipment use, set points, and system validation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Collect the information in the table below if commercial kitchen measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact declaration. Use additional sheets if required. The...
AI summary This document provides a template for collecting data on the installation and usage of commercial dish washers as part of an energy efficiency evaluation. It includes fields for quantity, location, manufacturer, model number, usage, and ENERGY STAR certification.
electricity heated hot water? Validate the equipment is ENERGY STAR certified: Operation [days/year]: Operation [number of racks washed/day]: Single/Multi-tank conveyor commercial dishwasher Project No. 6138 42 Direct Installation Program...
AI summary The text contains forms and data collection templates related to energy efficiency programs, specifically for commercial dishwashers and fryers, including questions about equipment usage, certification, and operational details.
turer: Model number: Harvest [lbs/day]: Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Does it replace non- ENERGY STAR ice maker? Validate the equipment is ENERGY STAR certified: Project No. 6138 45 Direct Installation Program E...
AI summary The text contains forms and data collection templates related to the installation and evaluation of energy-efficient equipment, including ice makers, convection ovens, and ventilation hoods. It includes questions about equipment usage, replacement of non-ENERGY STAR products, and verification of ENERGY STAR certification.
fan controlled by the VSD [hp]: Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Is the equipment controlled by T° and optical sensors located in exhaust hood? Operation [hours/year]: Project No. 6138 46 Direct Installation Program...
AI summary The document provides a template for collecting information on commercial laundry equipment, including details on installation, usage, and technical specifications. It focuses on ENERGY STAR and CEE Tier 2 certified washing machines, including questions about their current use, validation of certification, and operational data.
Size [cubic feet]: Is the equipment used for commercial purpose? Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Validate the equipment is CEE Tier 2 listed: Operation [cycles/week]: Project No. 6138 47 Direct Installation Program...
AI summary The document includes forms and protocols related to energy efficiency programs, specifically the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes data collection forms for commercial washing machines and a protocol for on-site visits during energy audits.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report EFFECTIVE USEFUL LIFE This appendix presents the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the SBES program component. First, the EUL of lighting...
AI summary This section discusses the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of lighting products in the SBES program, including methodology for calculating EUL based on annual hours of use and product specifications. It also mentions changes in regulation and baseline evolution.
ssed January 24, 2018). 4 US EPA. “Summary of the Energy Independence and Security Act. Public Law 110-140 (2007)”. Online: www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-energy-independence-and-security-act. Project No. 6138 51 Direct Installation...
AI summary The text discusses the update to the general service lamps minimum energy performance requirement under Amendment 16, which aligns with EISA 2020. This update will effectively ban the import and fabrication of efficient incandescent light bulbs, with the baseline change expected to occur in 2024.
ine increases will occur during their EUL, namely general-use and decorative lamps, reflector lamps, non-recessed downlight fixtures, and recessed downlight fixtures. General-use and decorative lamps The methodology used for establishing t...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for general-use and decorative lamps, using a baseline of 52 W and considering the replacement of incandescent lamps with LED A-type lamps. The EUL is calculated as 4.7 years based on data from Table 2 and the assumption that halogen incandescent lamps are the baseline technology.
∆ 4.7 5 Natural Resources Canada. “Forward Regulatory Plan 2017-19”. Online: http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codes- standards/18318, (last modified July 25, 2017). Project No. 6138 52 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova S...
AI summary The document discusses the baseline evolution of LED A-type lamps and reflector lamps over their effective useful life (EUL), noting that the baseline for LED reflector lamps does not increase over their 5.7-year EUL. It also mentions the replacement of halogen lamps with LED reflector lamps.
an EUL of 5.7 years. The baseline for this lighting product will therefore not increase throughout its EUL and so the equivalent EUL is equal to the EUL of 5.7 years. Non-recessed downlight fixtures Since non-recessed LED downlight fixture...
AI summary The text discusses the Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) of non-recessed LED downlight fixtures, explaining how their EUL is calculated based on changes in baseline regulations, including the transition to a 20 W compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) equivalent in 2024.
ent EUL of 6.8 years. ∆ 1 ∆ 6 ∆ 4.3 ∆ 6.8 Table 3: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED A-type Lamps for Downlight Fixtures Halogen Halogen Incandescent and CFL Equivalent Baseline Incandescent Incandescent Baseline A...
AI summary The text provides a table comparing the effective useful life and wattage of different types of lamps, including halogen incandescent, CFL, and LED A-type lamps, with references to U.S. federal legislation such as the EISA 2007.
9 52 43 43 34 20 11 6 As imposed by U.S. federal legislation. Incandescent Equivalent 2nd Tier EISA 2007. Project No. 6138 53 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Recessed downlight fixtu...
AI summary This text discusses the Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) of LED recessed downlight fixtures, replacing halogen lamps. The EUL is calculated as 11.3 years based on a 50,000-hour rated life. However, due to expected Canadian regulations in 2024, the baseline will shift to CFL equivalents, reducing the EUL to 8.8 years for the remaining 4.3 years of the LED fixtures' lifetime.
, the typical baseline products are already more efficient than the current regulation, which further suggests that a change in regulations would not affect the baseline efficiency in the near future. Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) tracked a...
AI summary The document discusses the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of occupancy sensors and lighting products, noting that current regulations already reflect efficient standards. Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) supports an EUL of 10 years for occupancy sensors, aligning with values used in other jurisdictions.
Equivalent Rated Life Annual Tracked EUL EUL Lighting Measure List Category EUL (hours) HOU (years) (years) (years) BER Instant Rebate Measures 1 x 4 Luminaires 2 x 2 Luminaires & Retrofit Kits Linear LED 2 x 4 Luminaires & Retrofit Kits 5...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing various lighting measures, their rated life, annual hours of use, tracked EUL, and equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for different types of LED and traditional lighting products. This data is related to energy efficiency and rebate programs.
4,380 8, 14, 15 or 18 13.7 13.7 Luminaires Parking Garage Luminaires 100,000 4,380 15 or 18 22.8 22.8 Project No. 6138 56 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report Other Products For product t...
AI summary The document discusses the establishment of Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for energy efficiency measures beyond lighting in the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. These values were determined based on a literature review and reliable sources, including technical reference manuals and evaluation reports.
DEER, 2008 VFD for milk vacuum pumps 15 PA Consulting Group, 2009 Air entraining air nozzles 15 PA Consulting Group, 2009 PA Consulting Group, 2009 Compressed Air receiver for load/no load screw compressors 15 ERS 200515 Air Cycling air dr...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures with associated costs and consulting firms, including VFDs, air dryers, and heat pumps, referencing multiple studies and reports from organizations like PA Consulting Group and ERS.
GDS, 2007 Air-to-water heat pumps; 15 ERS, 2005 10 Independent Electricity System Operator. IESO Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions List, October 2015. Accessed January 10, 2018 from IESO database. 11 PA Consulting Group. Focus on Energ...
AI summary The document references various technical and regulatory resources related to energy efficiency, including heat pumps, measure life studies, and technical reference manuals from multiple jurisdictions. It also mentions Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report.
Measure Revised EUL Measure Reference Category (years) DEER, 2008 Commercial heat pump clothes dryers 11 DEER, 2014 ERS, 2005 Ground source heat pumps; 15 GDS, 2007 DEER, 2008, 2014 HVAC hotel occupancy sensors 8 DEER, 2008 Packaged termin...
AI summary The document presents a table listing various energy efficiency measures along with their revised Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) in years and references to supporting documents. Each measure is categorized and associated with specific technical references.
Hot food holding cabinets 12 EnergyStar Calculator PG&E, 2007 DEER, 2008, 2011, 2014 Ice machines 10 PA Consulting Group, 2009 DEER, 2008, 2011 Ovens 12 EnergyStar Calculator PG&E, 2007 DEER, 2008, 2011 Steam cookers 12 EnergyStar Calculat...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures and their associated energy consumption data, citing sources such as EnergyStar Calculator, PG&E, DEER, and others. It includes equipment like hot food holding cabinets, ice machines, ovens, and commercial laundry equipment, along with references to technical manuals and stakeholder advisory groups.
linois Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Advisory Group, Illinois Statewide Technical Reference Manual for Energy Efficiency Version 6.0, February 2017. 17 ENERGY STAR, Commercial Food Service Equipment, https://www.energystar.gov/products/com...
AI summary The text references energy efficiency resources including the Illinois Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Advisory Group, the Illinois Statewide Technical Reference Manual, and the ENERGY STAR program for commercial food service equipment. It also cites Efficiency Vermont and a study by William Goetzler on energy savings potential for commercial building appliances.
Measure Revised EUL Measure Reference Category (years) PA Consulting Group, 2009 Brushless DC motors 15 ERS, 2005 Motors and DEER, 2008 VFDs Energy efficient motors 15 DEER, 2014 DEER, 2008 Variable Frequency Drives 15 ERS, 2005 Navigant,...
AI summary The text presents a table listing various energy efficiency measures along with their revised Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) in years and references to studies and reports. The table includes measures such as brushless DC motors, energy-efficient motors, variable frequency drives, and refrigeration compressors, with references to organizations like PA Consulting Group and ERS.
DEER, 2008, 2014 on Refrigerated vending machine controllers 5 ERS, 2005 Illinois TRM, 2017 Refrigeration economizers 15 Vermont TRM, 2015 Vertical refrigeration open to closed cooler DEER, 2008 12 conversions Zero energy doors 12 DEER 200...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures with associated costs and references to studies and organizations involved in evaluating these measures. It includes examples such as refrigerated vending machine controllers, heat pump water heaters, and insulation, with references to studies from DEER, ERS, and PA Consulting Group. The document is part of a 2017 DSM Evaluation by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
FR3a = (10 - Answer) x 10% would have simply kept your old equipment instead of installing energy- IF DK OR REF: FR3a = EMPTY efficient equipment in your facility? (Scale 0 to 10) MEAN VALUE OF: PA1 Score: (FR2ab; FR3a) FR1. Before having...
AI summary The text outlines a survey question (FR3a) asking respondents to rate the likelihood they would have kept old equipment instead of installing energy-efficient upgrades, with a calculation based on their response. It also includes a conditional scoring mechanism (PA1 Score) based on responses to questions about prior plans to implement energy-efficient upgrades as part of the SBES program.
FR1 = 0% PA2 Score: FR1a FR4. Level of influence – 7 factors (Scale 0 to 10) FR4 = MAX(a; b; c; d; e; f; g) PA3 Score: (10 − FR4) x 10% FR3b. [ASK IF TOTAL MEASURE QTY>1] If the audit, rebate and/or financing had not been offered, what is...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring framework used in the evaluation of the Direct Installation Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It includes questions assessing the influence of the program on participants' decisions to install energy-efficient upgrades and their likelihood of postponing such upgrades.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report DIY PATH – LIGHTING FR2ab. If your organization had not received the rebate or the financing FR2ab = Answer x 10% from ENS, would you have paid for the full cost of the lighting...
AI summary This section of the 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report asks respondents about their awareness and likelihood of purchasing premium lighting products without the rebate or financing from Efficiency Nova Scotia's Small Business Energy Solution Program.
MEAN VALUE OF: PA1 Score: (FR2ab; FR3a) IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a FR1. Had your organization already decided to install the energy-efficient IF 2. No OR DK OR REF: lighting system before learning about the SBES program? FR1 = 0% FR1a. [ASK IF FR...
AI summary The text outlines a survey or assessment tool used to evaluate the influence of the SBES program on the installation of energy-efficient lighting systems. It includes questions about pre-existing decisions and the likelihood of installation without program incentives.
10% from ENS, would you have paid for the full cost of the HVAC upgrades? IF DK OR REF: FR2 = EMPTY (Scale 0 to 10) FR3a. If the program rebate or financing had not been offered, what is the FR3a =Answer x 10% likelihood that you would hav...
AI summary The text asks respondents about their likelihood of paying for HVAC upgrades without program rebates or financing, and whether they had already decided to install energy-efficient systems before learning about the SBES program.
FR1 = 0% HVAC upgrades? PA2 Score: FR1 FR4. Level of influence– 5 factors (Scale 0 to 10) FR4 = MAX(a; b; c; d; e) PA3 Score: (10 − FR4) x 10% FR3c. [ASK IF FR2 a or b ≥5] If the program rebate or financing had not been offered, what is th...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring mechanism used in the evaluation of a Direct Installation Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It includes factors such as the level of influence, likelihood of postponing HVAC upgrades, and consistency tests to evaluate program effectiveness.
pant’s decision to implement these additional measures. The value established regarding this level of influence was used to determine the portion of the additional savings attributable to the program. Then, the level of internal spillover...
AI summary The text outlines a methodology to calculate internal spillover by comparing additional savings attributable to a program with total program savings. It also provides an example calculation for revising energy and peak demand savings, focusing on a lighting measure category that accounted for a significant portion of savings in the SBES program in 2017.
lation Algorithms The following algorithms include the parameters required to determine the annual energy savings and the annual peak demand savings associated with a linear lamp replacement measure. kWh 1,000 kW 1,000 Where: › : the exist...
AI summary The text describes algorithms for calculating annual energy and peak demand savings from replacing linear lamps, using parameters such as wattage, hours of use, and interactive effects factors. It also outlines the tracked savings calculation method based on an application submitted by an SBES participant, with an example of replacing 400 W MH fixtures with 200 W high-bay LED fixtures.
Table 7: Tracked Variables Used in the Calculation Example Baseline Measure – 400W High-bay MH Fixture Parameter Value Source Existing Lamp Quantity 100 Tracking Report Baseline Lamp Wattage (W) 400 Tracking Report Hours of Use (hrs/year)...
AI summary This table compares energy and demand usage between a 400W high-bay metal halide fixture and a 200W high-bay LED fixture, showing energy and demand savings achieved by switching to the more efficient LED fixture. The calculations are based on parameters such as lamp quantity, wattage, hours of use, and interactive effects factors.
Tracked Energy Savings (kWh) 87,360 Tracking Report Tracked Demand Savings (kW) 18.232 Tracking Report Revised Savings Calculation A total of five adjustments were made to the savings calculations based on the site-visit findings. The firs...
AI summary The document details adjustments made to energy savings calculations for a DSM project, including corrections to baseline and efficient wattage values, and revisions to the hours of operation (HOU) and capacity factor (CF) based on site visit findings.
Table 8: Revised Variables Used in the Calculation Example Baseline Measure – 400W High-bay MH Fixture Parameter Value Source Existing Lamp Quantity 100 Validated on site Duke Energy Fixture Wattage for Revised Baseline Lamp Wattage (W) 45...
AI summary The text presents a table comparing energy consumption and peak demand for two lighting fixtures: a 400W high-bay metal halide (MH) fixture and a 200W high-bay LED fixture. The table includes parameters such as lamp quantity, wattage, hours of use, and interactive effects factors, with calculated annual energy consumption and peak demand values for both measures.
ce Factor 0.5 Validated on site Annual Energy Consumption (kWh) 55,131 Calculation Annual Peak Demand (kW) 9.4 Calculation Revised Savings Revised Energy Savings (kWh) 79,178 Calculation Revised Demand Savings (kW) 13.500 Calculation Proje...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy and demand savings for a project under the Direct Installation Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including the use of an adjustment ratio algorithm. It also references the 2017 DSM Evaluation and the introduction of new codes and standards in Nova Scotia.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. The ratio of evaluated results to tracked results. This ratio expresses the Adjustment ratio adjustment made to tracked savings or other tracked values such as...
AI summary The text defines key terms related to energy efficiency measurement and verification, including accuracy, base case, displaced wattage, and EnerGuide ratings. These definitions are critical for evaluating program effectiveness and ensuring reliable energy savings calculations in regulatory proceedings.
efficiency of the building only and does not take into account occupant EnerGuide rating behaviour. It shows how energy efficient the home is through modelled heat losses of the home, based on several factors including building envelope ch...
AI summary The text defines several key terms related to energy efficiency and building performance, including EnerGuide ratings, effective useful life, equipment life, and equivalent CO2. These definitions are part of a broader document on codes and standards, specifically the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
ier 1 Yes CAN/CSA-C360-13 Refrigerators Yes CAN/CSA-C300-15 To evaluate the impacts of the new regulations on these products and codes listed in Table 1, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) contracted the Evaluator to assess the achieved annual i...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) contracted an Evaluator to assess the annual incremental energy and peak demand savings from new regulations on products and codes listed in Table 1. Evaluations were conducted annually from 2012 to 2016 and again in 2017, with the methodology updated in 2015 to use Statistics Canada sources and industry data for more accurate results.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Key Findings The 2017 evaluation has estimated the 2017 annual impact in terms of energy and peak demand savings as a result of introducing new regulations into the Nova Scotia market gover...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia estimates energy and peak demand savings resulting from new regulations governing products under Amendment 13 and provincial MEPS regulations. The total energy savings were 21.914 GWh and peak demand savings were 4.028 MW, equivalent to 14,312 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual avoided GHG emissions.
rt 9 Clothes Washers – Tier 1 Yes CAN/CSA-C360-13 Refrigerators Yes CAN/CSA-C300-15 To evaluate the impact of these regulations, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) hired the Evaluator to assess the annual energy and peak demand savings achieved...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) evaluated the impact of energy efficiency regulations on the Nova Scotia market from 2012 to 2017. The evaluation focused on five regulations, measuring market size, regulation impact, and energy savings differences between baseline and new standards.
ance Manufacturers or in dollar amounts with Canada or the Atlantic › Clothes washers Region) Interviews with Market Actors From early December 2017 to the end of January 2018, representatives from industry associations and retailers provi...
AI summary The document outlines interviews with industry associations, retailers, and Nova Scotia Power to evaluate the impact of energy efficiency regulations in Nova Scotia. Market size estimates and energy savings were analyzed based on data collected from these interviews and secondary research.
ted by the introduction of the new regulations in Nova Scotia; and (2) the savings resulting from each of the regulations, using the unitary savings values determined based on secondary data research. The Evaluator made efforts to ensure t...
AI summary The evaluation discusses the impact of new regulations in Nova Scotia, focusing on savings from Codes and Standards (C&S) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. It emphasizes that savings from C&S are distinct from those of ENS programs, as they result from different mechanisms: C&S increases mandatory minimum efficiency standards, while ENS focuses on improving product efficiency above existing baselines.
ova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3 IMPACT EVALUATION 3.1 Incandescent Lamps 3.1.1 Product Description For over 100 years, incandescent lamps have been widely used for lighting applications and their design and energy use have remained...
AI summary The document discusses the regulation and phase-out of incandescent lamps in Nova Scotia, including the implementation of Amendment 10 in 2012 and the subsequent delay through Amendment 12B in 2014. The amendments aimed to improve lighting efficiency and address concerns related to compact fluorescent lamps.
, for making further technology advances, and for addressing environmental and health concerns related to compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). Amendment 12B is intended to achieve three main objectives: › to provide Canadian customers with mo...
AI summary Amendment 12B aims to provide more lighting options for Canadian customers, reduce regulatory compliance burdens, and align with American standards. The phase-out of incandescent bulbs occurred in two stages, starting in 2014, with new regulations requiring lighting efficiency similar to halogen incandescent bulbs.
anadian customers three main types of products that meet the maximum wattage requirements set by the new standard, namely the incandescent halogen, the CFL and the LED. 3.1.3 Market Size Estimate EFC provided information about lighting pro...
AI summary The text discusses market size estimates for lighting products in Nova Scotia based on data from 2004 to 2017, including the impact of new energy efficiency standards implemented in 2014. It outlines the types of products that meet wattage requirements and provides a breakdown of wattage proportions based on historical sales data.
dential sector since 90 percent of all incandescent lamps were sold in that sector. These estimates are applied to the peak demand savings per unit to calculate the annual energy savings estimates. Codes and Standards 8 Codes and Standards...
AI summary The document discusses the energy savings from replacing incandescent lamps with more efficient alternatives, focusing on peak demand and annual energy savings. It also addresses interactive effects, such as changes in heating and cooling loads due to these replacements.
placement of incandescent lamps with more efficient products, such as halogen incandescent lamps, causes an increase in the heating load during winter and a decrease in the cooling load during summer. Table 9 below shows the interactive ef...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of replacing incandescent lamps with more efficient lighting products, such as halogen incandescent lamps, on heating and cooling loads. It also provides data from Table 9, which shows interactive effects factors for different heating and cooling system configurations in the residential sector.
r Air Conditioning 44% 0% 0% Weighted Interactive Effects Factor 100% -17.7% -40.4% 13 Natural Resources Canada, Energy Efficiency Act: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, September 22, 2011, available at (Last accessed...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings at the meter level, referencing regulations and reports on energy efficiency, including a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
% 0.268 Total 439,761 8.425 3.1.8 At the Meter Peak Demand Savings The peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand of the electricity system. The projected electricity-demand peak period...
AI summary The text discusses peak demand savings during specific hours in Nova Scotia and references the use of on-peak demand-to-energy ratios developed by Navigant in the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. It also mentions a comparison between data from the Residential Lighting Metering Study and literature values for lighting products.
mends applying the NERHOU study result of 0.162 W/kWh to all indoor and outdoor lamps. As shown in Table 11 below, the Evaluator estimates Nova Scotia’s total peak demand savings at 0.988 MW in 2017. Table 11: Peak Demand Savings Associate...
AI summary The text discusses the application of the NERHOU study result of 0.162 W/kWh to indoor and outdoor lamps, estimating total peak demand savings at 0.988 MW in 2017. It also introduces LED street-lighting as an energy-efficient alternative for Nova Scotia’s municipalities.
e street-lighting requirements of Nova Scotia’s municipalities. Many lighting manufacturers have been making strong efforts to develop LED products, and the technology has been advancing rapidly.17 16 NMR Group Inc. and DNV GL, Northeast R...
AI summary Nova Scotia passed legislation in 2011 requiring the replacement of street lighting with LED technology. NSP has until 2019 to complete replacements, while municipalities have until 2022. The average lifespan of current high-pressure sodium street lights is about five years, necessitating replacements within the next decade.
a (high-pressure sodium lights) is about five years, meaning that most of the existing stock will require replacement at some point well within the next 10-year period. 3.2.3 Market Size Estimate In 2009, the Union of Nova Scotia Municipal...
AI summary The document discusses the replacement cycle of high-pressure sodium lights in Nova Scotia, noting that most will need replacement within the next 10 years. It also references a 2009 inventory of street lights compiled by DMD & Associates Ltd. for the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities, which reported a total of 135,964 lights.
just/regulations/regs/eeappliances.htm> (Last accessed February 5, 2018) 19 DMD and Associates Ltd., Energy Efficient Street Lighting Strategies for Nova Scotia Municipalities, July 16,2009, available at (Last accessed February 5, 2018) Co...
AI summary The document discusses the electricity consumption of street lights in Nova Scotia, estimating 88,886,988 kWh annually in 2009. It highlights a significant shift in 2014 when the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) took ownership of 44,000 street lights, previously managed by NSP, and the subsequent replacement of these lights with LED technology. The contract for replacement was expanded in 2017 due to the discovery of more street lights than originally recorded.
f 2015 to replace the remaining units. During 2017, the contract was increased by $8.0 million as HRM is discovering that more street lights are in existence than NSP information originally suggested. During an interview with the Evaluator...
AI summary The text discusses the replacement of LED street lights in Nova Scotia from 2015 to 2017, highlighting discrepancies in reported numbers between HRM and NSP, and noting that the total figure may be underestimated due to lack of response from some municipalities. It also mentions prior conversions on provincial highways and certain municipalities.
accessed January 29, 2017). 21 NSP, the Nova Scotia Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, and municipalities that own street lights were all contacted as part of this evaluation. Codes and Standards 13 Codes and Standard...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the replacement of street lighting units with LEDs, using a conservative estimate of energy consumption based on average values. The Evaluator assumed that the least efficient units were replaced first, leading to a calculated reduction in energy use.
sumption. To estimate the total reduction in energy use resulting from replacements with LEDs, the Evaluator conducted a literature review of LED street-lighting study cases from other jurisdictions. Table 13: Literature Review of LED Stre...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted a literature review to estimate energy use reductions from replacing traditional street lights with LEDs, citing several study cases from different jurisdictions with varying savings percentages.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Although a similar baseline (high-pressure sodium) was used and most methodologies met the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America RP-8-0027 criteria of the American National Stan...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses energy savings from LED street-lighting installations. A conservative estimate of 35% energy savings was used, resulting in 4.966 GWh of annual energy savings from 21,685 LED units installed in 2017.
Class Units Replaced Savings Savings at the Meter in 2017 in 2017 (kWh/unit) (GWh) LED Street Lighting (HRM and NSP) 21,685 229 4.966 Total 21,685 4.966 3.2.7 At the Meter Peak Demand Savings The Evaluator estimates that 1.236 MW was saved...
AI summary The document reports on energy savings achieved through the replacement of traditional street lighting with LED lighting in Nova Scotia. A total of 21,685 units were replaced, resulting in 4.966 GWh of savings at the meter in 2017 and 1.236 MW of peak demand savings, attributed to the high peak coincidence factor of 100% during the winter peak load period.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3.3.2 Regulation Description In 2012, a new section entitled “Section 9.36. Energy Efficiency” was introduced to Part 9 (Houses and Small Buildings) of the 2010 edition of the NBC of Canada...
AI summary In 2012, Nova Scotia updated its building code by adopting the National Building Code (NBC) energy efficiency section, replacing the previous Part 10 regulations. This update aligned Nova Scotia with national energy efficiency standards and involved input from various stakeholders. The NBC is consistent with federal and provincial energy conservation programs like EnerGuide and ENERGY STAR®.
/www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=260002> (Last accessed January 15, 2018). 44 Statistics Canada, Catalogue Table 026-0002 Building permits, dwelling units by type of dwelling and area, 2016, available at (Last accessed January 18...
AI summary The text discusses statistical data and research related to building permits and energy efficiency in Nova Scotia, referencing Statistics Canada and the Natural Research Council Canada. It includes assumptions about floor area and building unit counts, as well as a reference to an energy efficiency evaluation report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report To determine the energy savings value of an EnerGuide rating point, the Evaluator used the unitary savings obtained from the 2015 evaluation, which was based on the evaluation of ENS’s New...
AI summary This report evaluates the energy savings from EnerGuide ratings based on 2015 data from New Home Construction participants. Building simulations overestimated electricity consumption by 16%, leading to an adjusted average savings of 1,278 kWh/year per EnerGuide point.
per EnerGuide point at 1,521 kWh/year. Using the overestimation ratio of 16 percent resulting from the billing analysis, the final savings value per EnerGuide point was established at 1,278 kWh/year. The literature review conducted by the...
AI summary The document calculates energy savings based on EnerGuide ratings and adjusts for overestimation. It also discusses heating sources in Nova Scotia, noting a high percentage of new homes use electricity for heating. A non-compliance rate of 58% was applied to savings due to regulation enforcement in 2014.
y building type. For ease of presentation, the electric energy savings have been calculated by comparing the annual energy consumption levels of NECB buildings with average MNECB and ASHRAE buildings. Table 20: Electric Energy Savings by B...
AI summary The text presents electric energy savings by building type, comparing NECB buildings with average MNECB and ASHRAE buildings. Savings range from 5.7% for strip malls to 13.2% for large office buildings, with data derived from Caneta Research simulations.
oposed Changes to NECB Relative to MNECB and ASHRAE 90.1-2007, March 2011. 51 Caneta Research, Performance Simulation of Proposed Changes to NECB Relative to MNECB and ASHRAE 90.1-2007, March 2011. Codes and Standards 22 Codes and Standard...
AI summary The document compares electricity peak demand savings across various building types under different codes, including NECB, MNECB, and ASHRAE 90.1-2007. It also highlights energy savings from residential market regulations in Nova Scotia in 2017.
d Small Buildings The Evaluator estimates that the introduction of the regulation regarding the residential market generated 1.290 GWh in energy savings in Nova Scotia in 2017, as listed in Table 22. Table 22: Energy Savings Associated wit...
AI summary The Evaluator estimated energy savings in Nova Scotia from the introduction of building code regulations in 2017. For single houses, 1.290 GWh of energy savings were recorded. For larger buildings, energy savings were calculated using per-square-meter energy needs from the NECB and applied to estimated floor areas.
13,380 1,595.0 0.119 Warehouse 3,891 153.1 0.039 Codes and Standards 23 Codes and Standards Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The factors ranged from 0.047 MWh/m2 for mid-rise apartments to 0.119 MWh/m2 for a strip mall in...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings associated with the introduction of the Building Code Regulation for large buildings, apartments, and condominiums. It provides energy use factors for different building types and estimates total incremental energy savings based on building permit data and the NECB.
gs3 at the Meter in 2017 Area1 (m2) Use2 (GWh) (GWh) Multi-unit Residential 294,81952 13.856 9.40% 1.303 Small Commercial 8,325 0.957 5.70% 0.055 Large Commercial 100,845 12.001 13.20% 1.584 Industrial 43,594 1.700 8.80% 0.150 Total 313,96...
AI summary The document provides data on energy savings across different building types, with multi-unit residential and large commercial buildings contributing the majority of the total energy savings of 3.091 GWh. The savings are calculated based on energy usage metrics from various tables.
ti-unit residential buildings account for 42 percent of the total savings and large commercial buildings account for 51 percent. 3.3.6 At the Meter Peak Demand Savings Houses and Small Buildings The peak demand savings were calculated usin...
AI summary Residential buildings account for 42% of total savings, while large commercial buildings account for 51%. Peak demand savings were calculated using a ratio of 0.283 MW/GWh, based on data from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. The regulation introduced in 2017 is estimated to have generated 0.365 MW in peak savings in Nova Scotia.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 25: Total Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of the Building Code Regulation for the Houses and Small Buildings Sectors in the Nova Scotia Market Number of Non-compl...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the impact of building code regulations on peak demand savings in Nova Scotia, focusing on single houses and large buildings. It uses a demand-to-energy ratio to estimate savings and considers peak demand periods from December to February.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3.4 Clothes Washers 3.4.1 Product Description Residential clothes washers are common household appliances. Clothes washers are classified in Canada according to size (standard over 45 L or...
AI summary This section of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses residential clothes washers, their classification, and the regulation of their energy efficiency. It outlines the amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations in 2016, which introduced two tiers of minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) effective from 2015 and 2018, with the latter not covered in the report.
in Nova Scotia from the Instant Savings 2017 evaluation to calculate a weighted average of all types of clothes washers. Table 29: Unitary Savings Values for Clothes Washers Product Class Annual Energy Annual Energy Weighted Average Saving...
AI summary This section discusses energy savings from the introduction of new minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for Tier 1 clothes washers in Nova Scotia. It calculates unitary savings values and estimates overall energy savings of 2.447 GWh at the meter in 2017.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 30: Energy Savings Associated with Clothes Washers’ New MEPS in the Nova Scotia Market Percentage of Nova Scotia Annual Energy Total Energy Savings Nova Scotia Market Product Class Market Affected by the Sa...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses energy savings from new minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for clothes washers in Nova Scotia. Table 30 shows total energy savings of 2.447 GWh annually, with peak demand savings estimated at 0.337 MW based on a demand-to-energy ratio from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 3.5 Refrigerators 3.5.1 Product Description Residential refrigerators are common household appliances. Refrigerators are classified in Canada mainly according to the freezer component’s pos...
AI summary This section of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses residential refrigerators, their classification, and the regulatory changes under Amendment 13 to the Energy Efficiency Regulations. The amendment, effective June 2017, aims to increase refrigerator efficiency by 15% and align with U.S. standards to reduce GHG emissions and ease compliance for manufacturers.
,544 4,997 Total 64,850 25,834 3.5.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation The NRCan cost-benefit analysis report on the standards covered by Amendment 13 provided the non- compliance rate for refrigerators in Canada prior to th...
AI summary The document discusses the non-compliance rate for refrigerators in Canada prior to new MEPS regulations, assuming Nova Scotia's rate is the same as the national rate. Table 34 estimates the percentage of shipments to Nova Scotia affected by the regulation in 2017 for different refrigerator types.
cessed February 2, 2018). 57 Dunsky Energy Consulting, Update - Market and Technology Assessment for Residential Clothes Washers in Canada, Final Report submitted to Natural Resources Canada), 2015. Codes and Standards 30 Codes and Standar...
AI summary The text discusses unitary savings values for refrigerators under Amendment 13 by NRCan and estimates energy savings from new MEPS regulations in Nova Scotia, reporting 0.052 GWh at the meter in 2017.
in energy savings of 0.052 GWh at the meter (see Table 36). Table 36: Energy Savings Associated with Refrigerators New MEPS in the Nova Scotia Market Projected Nova Percentage of Nova Scotia Market Annual Energy Total Energy Product Affect...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from new MEPS for refrigerators in Nova Scotia, with total annual energy savings of 0.052 GWh in 2017. Peak demand savings were estimated at 0.007 MW using a demand-to-energy ratio from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan.
mate peak demand savings for refrigerators. The Evaluator estimates that the introduction of the regulation generated 0.007 MW in peak savings in Nova Scotia in 2017, as summarized in Table 37 below. Codes and Standards 31 Codes and Standa...
AI summary The introduction of refrigerator standards in Nova Scotia led to energy and peak demand savings. The Evaluator estimates that in 2017, these standards generated 0.052 GWh in total energy savings and 0.007 MW in peak demand savings, as detailed in Table 37.
0.043 0.138 0.006 Total 0.052 0.007 3.6 Total Savings at the Generator Incremental annual energy savings at the meter were calculated by taking into account all product categories, for which the necessary information about the market size,...
AI summary The document calculates incremental annual energy savings at the generator level, using line loss factors provided by NSP for different sectors. It estimates 21.914 GWh and 4.028 MW of energy and peak demand savings in 2017, resulting in 14,312 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually, based on a Nova Scotia-specific GHG factor derived from 2016 data.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 38: Codes and Standards Overall Incremental Annual Energy and Peak Demand Savings, 2017 LED New Energy New Energy Code Incandescent Clothes Product Category Street- Code for for Comme...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia presents data on energy and peak demand savings from various product categories, including LED lamps, new energy codes for residential and commercial buildings, and energy-efficient appliances like clothes washers and refrigerators. The report quantifies energy savings at both the meter and generator levels, as well as peak demand reductions.
2017 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2017 evaluation. There were no incomplete 2016 recommendations at the time of writing. Sections Recommendations Executive 1 Include...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends including specific standards from Amendment 13 in the 2018 evaluation, focusing on products with significant savings potential, such as clothes washers, while excluding others like refrigerators due to low impact. Lighting, street-lighting, and building codes are also recommended for continued evaluation due to their significant savings.
ommends continuing to evaluate the impacts associated with lighting, street-lighting and building codes in 2018 since they provide significant savings. Project No. 6138 1 160 Saint-Paul Street, Suite 200, Quebec City, QC G1K 3W1 Canada / T...
AI summary The text recommends continuing to evaluate the impacts of lighting, street-lighting, and building codes from 2018 due to their significant energy savings potential.
E-9E1 (SBA) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-21
342 passages
the continuation approach established in the Electricity Plan 22 Implementation (2015) Act, with targets that are similar to the annual averages for the approved 23 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. 1 The legislation states: “(1) Notwithstandin...
AI summary The text references the continuation approach from the 2015 Electricity Plan Implementation Act, aligning 2019 efficiency targets with the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. It cites legislative provisions requiring Nova Scotia Power to enter a $34.05M agreement with the electricity efficiency franchise holder under the Public Utilities Act.
E1 (SBA) IR-01 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-02: 2 3 Please explain the reasons for setting the energy...
AI summary EfficiencyOne explains that its 2019 DSM Plan targets (127.2 GWh energy savings, 20.2 MW demand savings) align with prior annual averages under the 2016-2018 plan, adjusted for a $1M demand reduction allocation and 2017 evaluation results. The smaller variance in demand savings (-3%) versus energy savings (-6%) reflects updated evaluation data.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-07: 2 3 Regarding the savings from lighting and non-lighting measures: 4 a) Please provide the energy and demand savings of DSM programs offered in 5 2017 by breaking down among lighting and non-lighting measu...
AI summary The document requests and provides detailed energy and demand savings data from 2017 DSM programs, categorized by lighting and non-lighting measures. It lists specific programs like Efficient Product Rebates and their respective savings, with totals showing significant contributions from both lighting and non-lighting initiatives.
3.1 Direct Installation 6.3 1.6 1.1 0.3 Total 79.2 51.5 12.6 11.1 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (SBA) IR-07 Page 1 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advoca...
AI summary EfficiencyOne provides estimated energy and demand savings from its 2019 DSM Resource Plan, including program-specific breakdowns. The data includes contributions from residential and BNI programs, with total savings of 80.8 GWh and 57.5 MW. The response addresses the Small Business Advocate's inquiry.
3.6 Direct Installation 7.6 2.0 1.3 0.4 Total 80.8 57.5 13.0 12.9 4 5 Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Non- Non- DSM Program (2019) Lighting Lighting Lighting Lighting Measures Measures Measures Measures Efficient Product Rebates (...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing energy and demand savings from various DSM programs in 2019, including Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation. It is part of EfficiencyOne's response to the Small Business Advocate (SBA) regarding the 2019 DSM Resource Plan (M08604).
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 b) The Residential Socket Studies and the Market Evolution sections of the 2017 2 Evaluation Reports provide EfficiencyOne with information on the level of saturation 3 of LED lighting. This is used to help inform progra...
AI summary EfficiencyOne uses data from 2017 studies to inform program decisions, noting LED saturation growth and the need for additional energy-saving measures beyond lighting. The 2019 DSM Resource Plan emphasizes broader electricity reduction strategies.
Home Energy Assessment - - - - - - Green Heat - - - - - - Efficient Product Installation (LEDs only)4 N/A N/A 25% 25% N/A 25% Rental Properties & Condos (LEDs only)5 32% 30% N/A N/A 30% N/A 6 First Nations Home Energy Efficiency Pilot N/A...
AI summary The document outlines participation rates for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including home energy assessments, green heat initiatives, LED installations, rental property programs, and business energy rebates. It highlights varying participation levels across different program categories and target groups.
Lighting 17% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LED Linear Fixture N/A 37% 32% 32% 37% 32% LED Downlight Fixtures N/A 37% 36% 36% 37% 36% LED Linear Lamps N/A 34% 38% 38% 34% 38% LED General use/Decorative Lamps N/A 35% 38% 38% 35% 38% Custom Incentives...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency program participation rates for lighting technologies (LED fixtures, lamps) and incentives, including custom incentives and direct installation programs. It highlights varying participation rates across different product categories and program types, with notable entries for small business energy solutions.
E1 (SBA) IR-08 Page 5 of 5 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 1 of 24 201 11 Socket Stud dy Finall Repo ort Reproduction in whole or in part is not permitted without the express permission of Efficiency Nova Scotia Preep...
AI summary The document is a submission from the Small Business Advocate (SBA) in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including a report by Efficiency Nova Scotia dated December 2011. It outlines a filing related to energy efficiency programs and regulatory considerations.
888‐414 4‐1336 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 2 of 24 Table of Contents Page Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2...
AI summary The document outlines the 2011 Socket Study, analyzing light bulb usage and energy efficiency initiatives. It includes sections on bulb counts, adoption intentions, and in-home verification processes, aiming to assess program effectiveness and customer engagement in energy efficiency measures.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 3 of 24 2011 Socket Study 2 Introduction This report presents the results of the 2011 Socket Study conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia. The overall goal of this s...
AI summary The 2011 Socket Study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. for Efficiency Nova Scotia assessed market penetration of energy-efficient lighting (CFL/LED) and market transformation in Nova Scotia. It surveyed 1,004 residents, conducted 50 in-home bulb counts, and weighted results by region and home ownership. The study aimed to evaluate lighting usage patterns and intentions for adopting efficient technologies.
their light bulbs of various types. Respondents were given $50 as thanks for granting this compliance. Results from this component of the research are presented near the end of this report. This report includes a detailed analysis of the d...
AI summary The 2011 Socket Study found that 50% of Nova Scotia's bulbs are energy efficient (CFL/LED), with residents averaging 26 permanent fixture bulbs, 6 plug-in lamps, and 4 outdoor bulbs. Energy-efficient bulbs account for 19 per household, while regular bulbs dominate outdoor lighting (50%), with CFLs and LEDs comprising 40% and 10% respectively. Respondents were compensated $50 for participation.
s and plug‐in lamp bulbs. In contrast, regular bulbs comprise approximately one‐half of outdoor light bulbs, while four in ten outdoor light bulbs are CFL bulbs and one in ten are LED bulbs. Use of energy efficient CFL or LED permanent lig...
AI summary The text details energy-efficient bulb usage in Nova Scotia, noting CFL and LED prevalence in outdoor lighting, while permanent fixtures and plug-in lamps show different adoption patterns. Usage varies by demographics, heating sources, and household characteristics, with LEDs more common outdoors and CFLs/LEDs in residential settings.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 5 of 24 2011 Soccket Study 4 Detaile ed Analyssis Data Collection Proccess eting this stud In comple dy, nine in ten n residents (8 89%) indicate that they purrposefully waalked around their home to count c the...
AI summary The 2011 Soccket Study found that 89% of Nova Scotia residents manually counted light bulbs instead of estimating, and approximately half of all bulbs are energy-efficient CFL or LED, with LED being the least common type.
5 Energy Efficient Perm manent Ligh ht Fixture Bu ulbs Use of energy efficientt CFL or LED permanent p ligght fixture buulbs is more p prominent ammong residen nce owners, Nova N Scotianss who do nott live in aparttments, resideents 35 yea...
AI summary The text discusses the usage of energy-efficient CFL and LED bulbs in Nova Scotia, noting higher adoption among older, higher-income residents and those using non-oil/electric heating. Regular and CFL bulbs are equally common in permanent fixtures, while LEDs are less popular. Data from tables A3a-d supports these trends.
least half their permanent light fixture bulbs (55% compared to 43% of those who use electricity and 44% of those who use oil). LED Bulb Use in Permanent Light Fixtures – Detailed Findings As LED usage in permanent light fixture bulbs is n...
AI summary The 2011 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. found that higher-income households and homeowners in Nova Scotia are more likely to use LED bulbs in permanent fixtures compared to renters and lower-income residents. Plug-in lamp usage is less common but more prevalent among middle-aged residents and those using alternative heating sources.
(e.g., wood) LED (at least one plug‐ No population subgroup differences in lamp bulb) CFL Bulb Use in Plug‐in Lamps – Detailed Findings Higher proportions of residents who use at least one CFL bulb can be found in HRM (73%) compared to the...
AI summary The document analyzes CFL and LED bulb usage in Nova Scotia, noting higher CFL adoption in HRM and among older residents, lower usage by younger residents, and differences based on heating energy sources. LED usage is slightly higher in duplex/townhouse dwellings. Data is sourced from Corporate Research Associates Inc. (2011).
lb Use in Plug‐in Lamps. Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2011 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 10 of 24 2011 Soccket Study 9 Energy Efficient Outd door Light Bulbs B Approxim mately one‐ha alf of outdoorr light bul...
AI summary The text discusses the usage of energy-efficient outdoor light bulbs in Nova Scotia, noting that approximately half are CFLs or LEDs. LED bulbs are more common in outdoor lighting compared to permanent fixtures or plug-in lamps. Energy-efficient bulbs are more commonly used by homeowners and those who heat their homes with non-electric or non-oil sources.
only by residdents who owwn their dwellling (instead o of renting), and a among Nova Scotians who use ene ergy sources oother than eleectricity or oil to heat their homes. The followwing table outlines the chaaracteristics of o residents w...
AI summary The text discusses the usage patterns of different types of outdoor light bulbs among Nova Scotian residents, highlighting factors such as ownership status, heating energy sources, and employment status that influence the likelihood of using CFLs or LEDs instead of regular bulbs.
Women (at least one outdoor light bulb) Part‐time employment status CFL Outdoor Light Bulb Usage – Detailed Findings Those who own their residence are more likely to have at least one CFL outdoor light bulb (53%), as compared to those...
AI summary The text provides detailed findings on the usage of CFL and LED outdoor light bulbs among Nova Scotia residents, highlighting differences based on factors such as homeownership, gender, age, heating sources, housing type, and income levels. It notes that homeowners, men, older residents, and those using non-oil/electricity heating sources are more likely to use CFL bulbs, while apartment residents and lower-income households tend to use either all or none of CFL bulbs.
bulbs with CFL bulbs, while residents from higher‐income households (i.e., over $75K per year) tend to have a mix of CFL and regular bulbs. LED Outdoor Light Bulb Usage – Detailed Findings Residents who are more likely to have at least one...
AI summary The text discusses the usage patterns of different types of light bulbs among residents in Nova Scotia, noting that lower-income households tend to use CFL bulbs more frequently, while higher-income households use a mix of CFL and regular bulbs. It also highlights that homeowners, women, and part-time workers are more likely to use LED outdoor light bulbs.
ova Scotia, with slightlyy more than o one‐ half being g used on a tyypical day. As noted above, Nova Scotia residents have an overall o mean average of 266 permanent light fixture bulbs. Approximately four f in ten ressidents have fewer t...
AI summary Nova Scotia residents have an average of 266 permanent light fixture bulbs, with variations based on age, income, and housing type. Apartment residents have the lowest average (13), while detached home occupants have the highest (30).
SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 14 of 24 2011 Soccket Study 13 Although fewer permaanent light fixture bulbs are present perr capita amon ng Cape Breto on residents ((22) as compared to HRM (27), it is note eworthy that these t bulbs aare use...
AI summary The text discusses differences in the usage of permanent light fixture bulbs among residents in Cape Breton and HRM, noting that Cape Breton residents have fewer bulbs per capita but use them longer on average. Homeowners, apartment dwellers, and younger residents are more likely to use bulbs for six hours or more compared to non-homeowners, single-detached home residents, and middle-aged residents.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 20 of 24 2011 Soccket Study 19 Across thee population,, residents in Cape Breton turn on theirr outdoor ligh ht bulbs for appproximatelyy one hour longger (4.8 hours) as compared to HRM ressidents (3.7 h ours)...
AI summary The text discusses differences in outdoor lighting usage among residents in Cape Breton, HRM, and mainland Nova Scotia, noting variations by age group. It also highlights that up to half of residents intend to replace inefficient light bulbs with energy-efficient ones in the next year.
on‐efficient buulbs in the neext year with h energy efficiient light bulb bs. In order to assess theirr intentions too improve the e energy efficciency of theiir homes, resiidents were aasked to indicate whether be ehavioural staatements a...
AI summary The text discusses residents' intentions to replace non-efficient light bulbs with more energy-efficient alternatives, such as CFL and LED bulbs. It highlights that 39% plan to replace at least one bulb, with varying levels of certainty depending on the type of bulb.
frrom one perspective, residdents who heat their hommes with alternative source es of energy are a at the foreefront of eneergy efficiencyy. Turning to o CFL bulbs sp pecifically, residence owne ers are more likely than non‐owners to o ind...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency behaviors, focusing on the likelihood of residents replacing regular bulbs with CFL bulbs. It highlights that homeowners are more likely to replace bulbs than apartment dwellers and that higher-income households are more inclined to make such replacements.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 23 of 24 2011 Socket Study 22 Estimate of number of light Permanent Plug‐In Outdoor bulbs Regular Regular Regular Underestimated by 11+ 43% 2% 8% Underestimated by 3‐10 29% 37% 5% Correctly estimated within 2 1...
AI summary The 2011 Socket Study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. shows that residents generally underestimate the number of regular light bulbs but accurately estimate LED bulbs. This data highlights differences in consumer perception between traditional and energy-efficient lighting technologies.
................................................... 20 Study Methodology....................................................................................................................... 22 Appendices: A – Study Questionnaire B – Tabu...
AI summary This 2016 Socket Study, conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. for Efficiency Nova Scotia, aimed to assess the market penetration of energy-efficient lighting (CFL, LED, and Halogen bulbs) and the level of market transformation in the efficiency sector. The study surveyed 1,008 Nova Scotia residents online between November 17 and 29, 2016, with results weighted by region and homeownership.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 2, Page 4 of 24 2016 Socket Study 2 Executive Summary The results of the 2016 Socket Study indicate that approximately three-quarters of all bulbs are energy efficient CFL, LED or Halogen bulbs, up from approximately o...
AI summary The 2016 Socket Study shows that 75% of bulbs in Nova Scotia are energy-efficient (CFL, LED, or Halogen), up from 50% in 2011. While the average number of bulbs per household increased slightly, in-person verification found no evidence of a significant increase in total bulb count.
a households has increased over the past five years, the in-home, in-person verification visits conducted after the online survey research did not find evidence to support such a conclusion. As compared to 2011, there has been change in te...
AI summary The text discusses changes in the types of light bulbs used in Nova Scotia homes over the past five years, noting a decline in incandescent and CFL bulbs and an increase in LED and Halogen bulbs. In-home verification did not confirm an increase in household energy use.
n three outdoor light bulbs are CFL bulbs (35%, as compared to 37% in 2011), almost one in four are LED bulbs (23%, up from 10% in 2011), and 9 percent are Halogen bulbs (as compared to 0%). Use of at least one energy efficient LED or Halo...
AI summary This text discusses the adoption of energy-efficient light bulbs in Nova Scotia from 2011 to 2016, noting increased use of LED and CFL bulbs, decreased use of incandescent bulbs, and differences in adoption rates based on homeownership, age, and income.
igher household incomes. Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2016 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-08 Attachment 2, Page 5 of 24 2016 Socket Study 3 The percentage usage of plug-in lamp bulbs on a typical day is similar to the permanent l...
AI summary The 2016 Socket Study indicates that the usage of plug-in lamp bulbs is similar to permanent light fixtures, with residents using an average of 3.4 bulbs and 4.0 hours per day. Outdoor light bulbs are less common, with residents owning an average of 4.7 bulbs and using less than five on a typical day.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 2, Page 6 of 24 2016 Socket Study 4 Detailed Analysis Data Collection Process In completing this study, just over eight in ten residents (83%) indicate that they purposefully walked around their home to count the numbe...
AI summary The 2016 Socket Study found that 83% of Nova Scotia residents counted their light bulbs rather than estimate. Energy efficiency has increased, with three-quarters of bulbs being CFL, LED, or Halogen, up from 50% five years ago. The average number of bulbs per household increased by nearly 20% since 2011.
research findings) a net increase in the absolute number of bulbs in a household of just below 20 percent over the past five years (i.e., an average of an additional 7 bulbs per household). Regular Energy Efficient Number of Bulbs Overall...
AI summary The text presents findings from a 2016 socket study showing a net increase in the number of bulbs per household in Nova Scotia over five years, with energy-efficient bulbs like CFLs and LEDs becoming more prevalent compared to traditional bulbs.
n all Nova Scotian households, the discussion in the following paragraph is based upon tabulations entailing only those households that have outdoor light bulbs, plug-in lamps, and so forth. As compared to 2011, there has been a change in...
AI summary The text discusses the changing mix of light bulbs in Nova Scotia homes between 2011 and the present, showing a decline in incandescent and CFL bulbs and a rise in LED and Halogen bulbs, indicating a transition toward more energy-efficient lighting solutions.
hree outdoor light bulbs are CFL bulbs (35%, as compared to 37% in 2011), one in four are LED bulbs (23%, up from 10% in 2011), and 9 percent are Halogen bulbs (as compared to 0% five years ago). It is noteworthy that the incidence of hous...
AI summary The text discusses changes in the types of light bulbs used in Nova Scotia households from 2011 to 2016, noting an increase in the use of energy-efficient bulbs such as CFLs and LEDs, and a decrease in the use of regular incandescent bulbs. It also highlights differences in the adoption of energy-efficient bulbs based on home ownership, age, and income.
has risen notably to 28 percent. As previously indicated, the relative mix of energy efficient bulbs in the Nova Scotia marketplace is quite different than five years ago. (Tables A3a-e) In identifying the market penetration of energy effi...
AI summary The market penetration of energy-efficient lighting in Nova Scotia has shifted over the past five years, with CFL bulbs remaining the most popular despite a declining market share. LED bulbs are growing in use, and lower-income households and renters tend to use more CFL bulbs compared to higher-income households and homeowners.
re Regular bulbs No marked population subgroup (over 50% of permanent light fixture bulbs) differences Those renting their residence Residents living in a duplex/townhouse CFL or an apartment (over 50% of permanent light fixture bulbs)...
AI summary The text discusses the distribution of different types of light bulbs in Nova Scotia, noting that regular bulbs are the most common, followed by CFL and LED. It highlights that certain groups, such as renters and those with lower incomes, are more likely to use permanent light fixture bulbs. Plug-in lamp bulbs are less common.
by a margin of at least 8 percentage points. Energy Efficient Plug-in Lamp Bulbs Plug-in lamp bulbs remain considerably less common than permanent light fixture bulbs. As with permanent light fixture bulbs, use of at least one energy effic...
AI summary The text discusses the usage patterns of energy-efficient plug-in lamp bulbs in Nova Scotia in 2016, noting that ownership rather than renting is associated with higher use of LED bulbs, and that CFL bulbs are more common among renters. The data highlights differences in bulb usage based on household income and age.
n lamp bulb: Plug-in Lamp Bulbs Light Bulb Type Residents Most Likely to Use More Regular bulbs Women (over 50% of plug-in lamp bulbs) Those renting their residence CFL Residents living in a duplex/townhouse (over 50% of plug-in lamp...
AI summary The document discusses the usage patterns of different types of plug-in lamp bulbs among various resident groups, noting that regular bulbs are more commonly used by women and renters, while LED bulbs are more common in single-detached dwellings. It also highlights an increase in the use of energy-efficient outdoor light bulbs from one-half in 2011 to eight in ten.
Energy Efficient Outdoor Light Bulbs Whereas approximately one-half of outdoor light bulbs in 2011 were energy efficient bulbs, since that time this figure has risen to eight in ten. Having at least one outdoor LED or Halogen energy effici...
AI summary The document discusses the increasing adoption of energy-efficient outdoor light bulbs, such as LED and CFL, over time, with a notable rise in usage among homeowners compared to renters. It also highlights the declining use of incandescent bulbs and the growing presence of halogen bulbs.
ent light fixture bulbs on a typical day, up from 14 in 2011. This amounts to just over one-half of their total permanent light fixture bulbs (56%, the same as in 2011) being typically used. Another representation of permanent light fixtur...
AI summary The text discusses the usage of permanent light fixture bulbs in homes, noting that about 56% of these bulbs are typically used on a given day. It also compares usage patterns from 2011 to 2016, highlighting changes in the proportion of residents using different numbers of bulbs.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 2, Page 15 of 24 2016 Socket Study 13 Although slightly fewer permanent light fixture bulbs are present per capita among Cape Breton (29.1) and Rest of Mainland (29.8) residents as compared to HRM (31.5), these bulbs a...
AI summary The text discusses the usage patterns of permanent light fixture bulbs and plug-in lamp bulbs across Nova Scotia, highlighting differences in bulb quantity and usage duration between regions and demographics. It also notes an increase in the number of residents owning ten or more plug-in lamp bulbs compared to five years ago.
ht bulbs for one hour (12%, as compared to 14%). Two in ten residents report using their outdoor light bulbs for less than one hour on a typical day (16%, as compared to 17%). (Table A11) Across the population, residents in Cape Breton tur...
AI summary The text discusses residential outdoor light bulb usage patterns in Nova Scotia, highlighting differences between regions and age groups. It also notes that three-quarters of households plan to replace less-efficient bulbs with more energy-efficient alternatives in the next year.
19 Intentions to Implement Energy Efficient Light Bulbs Three-quarters of households intend to replace less-efficient bulbs in the next year with (more) energy efficient light bulbs. In order to assess their intentions to improve the energ...
AI summary Three-quarters of households plan to replace less-efficient light bulbs with more energy-efficient ones within the next year. While many intend to switch to CFL or LED bulbs, a significant portion remain unsure or indicate no intention to make the switch.
light bulbs by replacing at least one regular bulb with an LED light bulb (40%). Another one-third indicate that they are unsure (34%), while one-quarter say that they will not do so (25%). In terms of Halogen light bulbs, a smaller minori...
AI summary The text discusses survey results on residents' intentions to replace regular light bulbs with more energy-efficient options such as LED or Halogen bulbs. It highlights demographic trends, noting that homeowners, older residents, and higher-income households are more likely to make such replacements. The data is presented in tables and includes findings from the 2016 Socket Study.
lely on the n=1,004/1,008 year-over-year survey data) that the absolute number of bulbs in the province, per household, has climbed over the past half-decade. Panel vs. Site Visit Analysis CFL LED Regular Halogen Types Study Panel Site Dif...
AI summary The document presents data from a 2016 socket study, comparing the number of different types of light bulbs (CFL, LED, Regular, Halogen) in homes across two survey methods: panel and site visits. The data shows changes in bulb usage from 2011 to 2016, indicating a shift in lighting technologies over time.
SBA IR-08 Attachment 2, Page 23 of 24 2016 Socket Study 21 CFLs Mean scores suggest that in general panel members accurately count the number of CFL bulbs in their home. That said, 28 percent underestimated their number of permanent CFL bu...
AI summary The 2016 Socket Study shows that residents generally accurately estimate the number of CFL bulbs in their homes, though some overestimate or underestimate by significant margins. For regular light bulbs, a notable minority underestimate the number of permanent bulbs, though accuracy has improved compared to 2011.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-11: 2 3 Regarding the measures included in Direct Installation program 4 a) Please supply a table that contains list of measures offered via Direct Installation 5 program for every year during 2016 and 2017. I...
AI summary The response to Request IR-11 explains that the Direct Installation program's data is available at the end-use level rather than the measure level for 2016 and 2017. For 2018 and 2019, EfficiencyOne provides targets at the program and component level, not measure level, and refers to technical tables in the DSM Resource Plan for details.
projects for Multi-Unit Residential 26 Buildings (MURBs), the audit and rebate process needed for the pilot was already in 27 place within SBES. The majority of measures anticipated to be recommended 28 through the audit phase of the pilot...
AI summary The text discusses a pilot program for Multi-Unit Residential Buildings (MURBs) and highlights that the audit and rebate process was already in place within SBES. The majority of measures anticipated for the pilot were also available through SBES, such as lighting and heat pumps. The table provides a breakdown of energy savings, peak demand savings, and expenditures for the pilot and regular program results.
E1 (SBA) IR-14 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-15: 2 3 Regarding the incentive levels for measures includ...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan continues the approach from 2018 without specific new incentive levels for the Direct Installation program. ENS anticipates similar measures and incentives to those in 2018, though changes may occur based on market trends and program needs.
/ cUL rated 36-48 20 $65 >49 23 $85 • BESS or AMCA listed 18-35 14 $25 • Must replace existing circulation fans Circulation Fan 36-49 20 $50 (unless building is new construction) • CSA / cUL rated >50 27 $75 High Volume Low Speed Fans (HVL...
AI summary The text outlines rebate criteria for various energy-efficient products, including circulation fans, high volume low speed fans (HVLS), and agriculture heat pads, specifying size ranges, eligibility requirements, and rebate amounts.
<100 $60 • CSA / cUL rated Double Heat Pad <200 $120 Enjoy the good things efficiency brings. ENS-01159-V1 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-15 Attachment 1, Page 2 of 23 Dual & Natural Ventilation Facility Operation Time Criteria Rebate • B...
AI summary The document outlines rebate criteria for ventilation systems in agricultural facilities. It specifies eligibility for dual and natural ventilation systems based on facility operation time and type, with different rebate rates for year-round and winter-only use.
broilers, turkeys, and sheep. Note: For facility types not listed, where mechanical ventilation has been or would traditionally be employed, contact Efficiency Nova Scotia for a customized rebate. Livestock Waterers Product Criteria Wattag...
AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient equipment in agricultural settings, including livestock waterers, engine block timers, and dairy farm compressors, with specific criteria and rebate amounts.
ENS-01159-V1 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-15 Attachment 1, Page 3 of 23 Efficient Product Rebates Commercial Compressed Air Equipment Rebate Guide The following tables list the product requirements and rebates available for energy-effic...
AI summary This document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient compressed air products, including air-entraining air nozzles and cycling refrigerated air dryers, with specific eligibility criteria and rebate amounts for different capacities.
occupied $50 intelligent control • Hotel must operate year round Small Air Source Heat Pumps - Installed in Multi-Unit Facilities (3 or more units) Size (Nominal Min HSPF Min Capacity) Type (Region IV) SEER Requirements Rebate • Applicant...
AI summary The text outlines rebate requirements and eligibility criteria for installing small air source heat pumps in multi-unit facilities with three or more units. It specifies minimum HSPF and SEER ratings, system requirements, and rebate amounts per ton of capacity.
8.5 15 replacing an existing air-source $400 / ton Heat Pump heat pump or in new construction Enjoy the good things efficiency brings. ENS-01158-V11 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-15 Attachment 1, Page 5 of 23 Small Air Source Heat Pumps...
AI summary The text outlines a rebate program for the installation of small air source heat pumps in commercial facilities, specifying requirements and rebate amounts based on performance metrics such as HSPF and SEER.
ial Facilities Size (Nominal Min HSPF Capacity) Type (Region IV) Min SEER Requirements Rebate Single Package • Facility must be commercial 8.2 15 property $300 / ton Systems • Heat Pump must be utilized over Centrally Ducted Split the heat...
AI summary The document outlines rebate requirements and efficiency standards for various heating systems, including single package systems, ducted split systems, and ductless mini-split heat pumps, specifying minimum HSPF and SEER ratings and eligibility criteria for rebates.
air-source heat pump or in a new 3.5 2.25 11.4 construction $600 / ton Ground & Water Source Heat Pumps Size (Nominal Capacity) Min EER Min COP Requirements Rebate • Heat pump must be utilized during heating 16.2 3.6 season $500 / ton Open...
AI summary The text outlines rebate programs for heat pumps, specifying eligibility criteria, minimum efficiency standards, and rebate amounts based on the type and capacity of the heat pump. It also references testing standards and provides contact information for inquiries.
lacing an existing air-source or water source heat pump or in a new construction Packaged Terminal Heat Pumps (PTHP) New Construction Replacement (Standard Size ) (Non-Standard Size ) High Low Heating Heating Size (47F) (17F) Min Min (Nomi...
AI summary The text outlines rebate requirements for heat pumps, specifying minimum performance standards and eligibility criteria for new construction and replacement units, including the need for AHRI certification and offsetting electric resistance heating.
existing PTHP unit or in a new construction Standard size refers to having an external wall opening greater than or equal to 16 inches high or greater than or equal to 42 inches wide, and a cross-sectional area greater than or equal to 670...
AI summary The document outlines rebate criteria for energy-efficient IT and datacenter products, focusing on server-based power management software that enables monitor shut-down and computer sleep mode within 30 minutes of inactivity.
Product Requirements Rebate • ENERGY STAR rated ® Standard Capacity Electric Fryer $500 • MUST be replacing an electric fryer or a new installation • ENERGY STAR® rated Standard Capacity Gas Fryer $2,000 • MUST be replacing an electric fry...
AI summary The text outlines rebate amounts and product requirements for various kitchen appliances, including electric and gas fryers and griddles, emphasizing ENERGY STAR® certification and replacement criteria.
Product Requirements Rebate • ENERGY STAR rated ® Electric Steam Cooker • MUST be replacing an electric steam cooker or a new $300 / Pan installationn • ENERGY STAR® rated Gas Steam Cooker $600 / Pan • MUST be replacing an electric steam c...
AI summary The document outlines rebate requirements for electric and gas steam cookers, specifying that they must be ENERGY STAR rated and replacing an electric steam cooker. Rebates are provided per pan capacity, with different amounts for electric and gas models.
Requirements Rebate • ENERGY STAR rated ® • Idle Input rate less than 1.5kW Electric Convection Oven Half or Full Size $400 • MUST be replacing electric convection oven or a new installation • ENERGY STAR® rated Gas Convection Oven Half or...
AI summary The document outlines rebate requirements for various types of ovens, specifying eligibility criteria such as ENERGY STAR® ratings and replacement conditions. It includes rebate amounts for electric and gas convection and combination ovens. The document is labeled as ENS-01163-V1 and is part of a filing dated May 30, 2018.
ay qualify for rebates in addition to those listed here Commercial Washing Machines Measure Criteria Rebate • ENERGY STAR® rated ENERGY STAR ® • Building must use electrically heated water $150 Washing Machine • Used for commercial purpose...
AI summary The text outlines rebate criteria for commercial washing machines and clothes dryers based on their energy efficiency ratings. Eligibility depends on factors such as ENERGY STAR® certification, Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) tier listings, and the use of electrically heated water.
g/lighting-controls/download-the-qpl Projects replacing existing energy efficient lighting may not be available for rebates. Please contact us to confirm before you purchase and install your product. Rebates that state availability as “in-...
AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient commercial lighting products, specifying eligibility criteria and availability. Rebates are available for decorative and general use lamps, provided they are ENERGY STAR® certified and purchased from participating distributors. Additional rebates may be available for businesses with utility bills under $3,800 monthly.
All $3 • Must be ENERGY STAR® certified • Includes R, BR, MR, PAR lamp Small (< 20) $5 shapes Reflector (Directional) Lamp In-store • Must be ENERGY STAR® Large (> 20) $6 certified Enjoy the good things efficiency brings. 3 3,000 lm $15 oc...
AI summary The document outlines rebate criteria for various lighting products, emphasizing ENERGY STAR® certification and specific lumens ranges for eligibility. Rebates vary based on product type and size, with in-store availability noted for some items.
99 lm $400 premium product > 55,000 lm $550 • Includes high-bay aisle 10,000 – 19,999 lm $100 luminaires and high-bay luminaires for commercial and 20,000 – 29,999 lm $160 High-bay Luminaire (DLC industrial buildings Mail-in 30,000 – 39,99...
AI summary The text outlines pricing tiers for high-bay and low-bay luminaires based on lumens output, with specific price points for different ranges. The products must be DLC qualified and are available through mail-in and in-store options.
3 25,000 lm $200 250 – 999 lm $15 • Includes landscape/accent 1,000 – 4,999 lm $30 flood and spot luminaires landscape, and architectural 5,000 – 14,999 lm $100 Flood and Spot Luminaires In-store flood and spot luminaires and retrofit kits...
AI summary The document outlines rebate criteria for various lighting products, including wall-mounted area luminaires and flood and spot luminaires, based on their lumens and qualification standards.
certified or DLC approved fixtures with integrated occupancy sensors • Fixture must automatically shut off during the day by using a timer, photo-sensor or similar technology Occupancy Sensor - Exterior In-store • For use with LED or $10 f...
AI summary The text outlines rebate programs for efficient product installation, including requirements for occupancy sensors and daylighting controls, with specific eligibility criteria and rebate amounts for commercial pool equipment.
%D% Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-15 Attachment 1, Page 17 of 23 Efficient Product Rebates Commercial Pool Equipment Rebate Guide The following table lists the product requirements and rebates available for energy-efficient commercial p...
AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient commercial pool and pumping equipment, including eligibility criteria and rebate amounts. It emphasizes ENERGY STAR® certified products and recommends working with pool system contractors for installation.
he product requirements and rebates available for a range of energy efficient pumping technologies. For more information on where to purchase rebated products please visit our website efficiencyns.ca. If your utility bill is less than $3,8...
AI summary The document outlines energy-efficient product rebates for commercial refrigeration and pumping technologies, including eligibility criteria and rebate amounts. It provides information on where to purchase rebated products and highlights the benefits of energy efficiency.
e Guide The following tables list the product requirements and rebates available for energy efficient commercial refrigeration products. For more information please visit our website efficiencyns.ca. If your utility bill is less than $3,80...
AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient commercial refrigeration products, including strip-curtains, cooler night covers, open-to-closed cooler conversions, and zero-energy doors for reach-in coolers. Rebates are provided based on specific product requirements and eligibility criteria.
$120/door reach-in coolers • Door frames with electric resistance heating (heaters in door or frames) are not eligible. Humidity or conductivity based heater controls that limit heater operation $80/door Door heater controls to periods of...
AI summary The text outlines eligibility criteria and rebate amounts for energy efficiency measures related to reach-in coolers and evaporator fan motor controls. Door frames with electric resistance heating are not eligible, while humidity or conductivity-based heater controls are eligible for rebates.
Note: this measure may not result in significant energy savings if the system is under-sized or if the evaporator does not use off-cycle or time-off defrost. • The control system contains temperature and pressure sensors to monitor system...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures for refrigeration systems, including intelligent freezer defrost controls and outside air economizers, with eligibility criteria and rebate amounts. It highlights the importance of proper sizing and system operation for energy savings.
economizer Note: Walk-in coolers smaller than 1,000 cubic feet are not eligible for rebates. Refrigerated vending Controller uses occupancy sensor based controls to de-energize $50/controller machine controls refrigerated vending machines...
AI summary The document outlines various rebate programs for energy-efficient refrigeration equipment, including walk-in coolers, refrigerated vending machines, and electronically commutated DC motors. Eligibility criteria and rebate amounts are specified, along with temperature classifications for different cooling applications.
25 – 40 °F -4 – 4 °C High temperature (HT) 41 – 65 °F 5 – 18 °C Related Measures: ENERGY STAR® certified ice machines and standalone reach-in refrigerators and freezers can be found in the Kitchens Application. LED case lighting for refrig...
AI summary The text outlines temperature ranges and related energy efficiency measures, including ENERGY STAR certified appliances and LED lighting. It also mentions rebate programs for commercial solar thermal products and provides a website for additional information.
sit our website efficiencyns.ca. If your utility bill is less than $3,800 monthly and you have not yet purchased your products, your business may qualify for rebates in addition to those listed here. To qualify for a rebate, the VFD will b...
AI summary The text outlines eligibility criteria and rebate amounts for Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) used in specific applications by businesses with monthly utility bills under $3,800. Rebates vary based on motor horsepower and application type, with additional requirements such as automatic control and new installation.
on the drive AC input connections (ask your supplier for more 25 hp information). $2,500 • VFDs that control forward-curve fans with inlet guide vanes or variable $3,000 30 hp pitch vane-axial fans are not eligible for rebates. 40 hp • Mus...
AI summary The document outlines rebate criteria and amounts for energy-efficient commercial water heating products, specifically focusing on heat pump water heating systems. It specifies that systems with an energy factor greater than 2.3 and installed in electrically heated spaces are eligible for a $600 rebate.
$600 • Installation in electrically heated spaces not eligible for incentives • Existing system must be an electric hot water system < 80 gal and < 60 gal • Approval required before purchasing $700 • Product must be CSA approved or equival...
AI summary The document outlines eligibility criteria and rebate amounts for water heating installations under Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs. It specifies conditions such as system size, approval requirements, and certification standards. The document also references the EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) and responses to the Small Business Advocate.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-16: 2 3 With regard to the Small Business Energy Study (SBES) completed in 2017: 4 a) Please provide the recent version of the SBES study. 5 b) Please list any marketing and process improvements identified in...
AI summary The response to Request IR-16 regarding the Small Business Energy Study (SBES) provides the 2017 version of the study and outlines actions taken by EfficiencyOne based on CRA’s recommendations, including outreach initiatives to increase awareness of energy efficiency programs for small businesses.
with companies and organizations who 14 engage with small businesses to help provide accurate information on Small Business 15 Energy Solutions and Business Energy Rebates. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (SBA) IR-16 Page 2 of 2 Date Filed: Ma...
AI summary This document outlines a research report on small business energy efficiency, prepared for Efficiency Nova Scotia by Consulting Research Associates. It focuses on providing accurate information on energy solutions and rebates for small businesses.
ix A – Study Questionnaire Appendix B – Tabular Results Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 3 of 81 Introduction The Request for Proposals (RFP) for this study indicated that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) offers several pr...
AI summary This document outlines a research project commissioned by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) to understand the motivations and barriers that influence small businesses' participation in ENS energy efficiency programs, such as Direct Installation and Efficient Product Rebates. The study aims to inform program design and marketing strategies.
sense, the research aimed to provide insight into why small businesses do or do not participate in energy efficiency programs. More specifically the research explored the following questions: What are the costs to program Participants an...
AI summary This research aimed to understand why small businesses participate or do not participate in energy efficiency programs, focusing on the costs, benefits, barriers, and overall experience with Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. It involved 500 telephone interviews conducted between January 30 and March 3, 2017.
curred from January 30 to March 3, 2017. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 4 of 81 Executive Summary The 2017 Small Business Energy Efficiency Research study commissioned by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) provides insight...
AI summary A 2017 study commissioned by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) examined small business participation in energy efficiency programs. It found that 25% of NSP small business clients with specific rate codes participated in ENS programs, while 75% did not. Non-participants were aware of ENS but not necessarily of its specific programs, and many had updated lighting equipment between 2011 and 2016.
va Scotia as an organization, only a smaller majority of these organizations indicate that they were specifically aware of the programs available to small businesses in the province. Of the Non-Participant organizations aware of the ENS bu...
AI summary The analysis indicates that while many non-participating organizations are aware of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) business programs, only a minority have considered participation, primarily due to interest in energy savings. Improved communication could increase participation, as most organizations express a willingness to join in the future and hold a favorable view of ENS.
organizations indicate that they would participate in the future, coupled with the fact that nearly all Non-Participants hold a favourable overall opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia. Among Participants, it is widely agreed that energy savin...
AI summary The text discusses the participation of small businesses in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, noting high satisfaction with energy savings and bill reductions. Nearly all participants would recommend the programs and expect future participation, with positive overall opinions of Efficiency Nova Scotia.
g conclusions are drawn from the detailed analysis of the study’s findings: One-quarter of small businesses report having participated in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program. Using random probability sampling of small businesses wit...
AI summary The study found that 25% of small businesses with specific Nova Scotia Power rate codes participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. Non-participants were generally aware of the programs, with word of mouth being the primary source of awareness. Seven in ten non-participants expressed interest in future participation.
cipants having previously considered participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program, seven in ten organizations would likely participate in such a program in the future. Among Non-Participant organizations that report awarenes...
AI summary The text discusses participation rates in Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, noting that seven in ten organizations are likely to participate in the future. It highlights that energy savings and power bill reduction are key motivators for participation, and that despite low familiarity with the programs, most organizations have a favorable opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia.
ations The vast majority of Participant organizations made the decision to participate in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program so as to save energy or reduce their power bill. In terms of sources of program awareness, Participant org...
AI summary Most Participant organizations joined Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs to save energy and reduce power bills. They primarily learned about the programs through ENS contact or word of mouth. Most participants experienced energy use and bill reductions, and the majority believe these outcomes met expectations.
mes resulting from program participation, six in ten organizations report having closely monitored energy consumption after taking part in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program. Nearly all Participant organizations would recommend Eff...
AI summary The text highlights that most organizations participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs would recommend them, with a variety of suggestions for improvement. However, promoting energy efficiency in communications and marketing is uncommon among participants, and organizations less inclined to participate or recommend programs are also less likely to promote energy efficiency.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 8 of 81 Favourable overall opinions of Efficiency Nova Scotia are widespread among Participant organizations. Nearly all Participant organizations offer a favourable overall opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia, w...
AI summary The text highlights widespread favorable opinions of Efficiency Nova Scotia among Participant organizations, with a majority expressing mostly or completely favorable views. It also recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia increase awareness of Small Business Energy Solutions and Business Energy Rebates.
sideration of Efficiency Nova Scotia: 1. Efficiency Nova Scotia should take steps to build greater awareness of Small Business Energy Solutions and Business Energy Rebates. Despite the fact that ENS has been in existence only a few years,...
AI summary The text recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) increase awareness of its energy programs for small businesses and use study results to highlight participation benefits. Current research shows that while ENS has good participation, many non-participants cite a lack of awareness as the main barrier.
ed familiarity with the programs offered. 2. Efficiency Nova Scotia should utilize the study results to highlight program participation benefits for potential participants. As an extension of the above recommendation specifically focused u...
AI summary The text recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) use study results to promote program participation benefits and encourages Participant organizations to highlight their energy efficiency practices in communications and marketing materials to increase awareness and differentiate themselves from competitors.
omotional tool for ENS business programs. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 10 of 81 Detailed Analysis Incidence of ENS Program Participation One-quarter of small businesses report having participated in an Efficiency N...
AI summary The document discusses the participation rates of small businesses in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, noting that 24% of businesses with specific Nova Scotia Power rate codes participated. Participation is consistent across service regions, with businesses having more employees or recent lighting upgrades more likely to participate. Awareness of ENS programs is moderate, with word of mouth being the primary source of awareness among non-participants.
A small majority of Non-Participant companies are aware of Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, with word of mouth communication representing the most common source of awareness. Prior to this study, just under six in ten (56%) Non-Pa...
AI summary The text discusses awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia's business programs among Non-Participant companies, noting that word of mouth is the primary source of awareness. Nearly all Non-Participant organizations (95%) are aware of Efficiency Nova Scotia, with higher awareness among larger organizations and those familiar with the organization overall.
ered participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program, seven in ten organizations would likely participate in such a program in the future. Program Consideration Among those Non-Participant organizations that had heard of Effici...
AI summary The text discusses participation and consideration of Efficiency Nova Scotia's business energy efficiency programs. It highlights that seven in ten organizations would likely participate in the future, and among non-participants, 35% had considered participation. The primary reason cited was seeking energy savings and reducing power bills, followed by environmental concerns and financial incentives.
environmentally friendly (20%), Efficiency Nova Scotia paying for part of the costs, rebates, or incentives (15%), and wanting to make their location more comfortable (12%). (Table 13) There do not appear to be notable differences in the r...
AI summary The text discusses reasons for participation and non-participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s business energy efficiency programs. Key reasons for participation include environmental concerns, cost-related incentives, and comfort improvements. Non-participation is often attributed to lack of awareness, lack of information, and not prioritizing energy efficiency. A majority of non-participants indicate they are likely to participate in the future.
articipate in any of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s business programs in the future. The results indicate that seven in ten (70%) say they would definitely or probably do so in the future. Applying this rule, the current findings suggest that on...
AI summary The survey indicates that 70% of Non-Participant organizations would likely participate in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business programs in the future, with 24% definitely participating. Those familiar with ENS or had lighting equipment installed were more likely to participate.
though familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia programs is low, nearly all Non-Participants aware of the programs offer a favourable opinion of the organization. Program Familiarity Non-Participant organizations were asked to rate their le...
AI summary The text discusses the low familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs among non-participating organizations, though those familiar generally hold a favourable opinion of ENS. Three in ten non-participants are familiar with the programs, and 90% of those familiar have a mostly or completely favourable opinion of ENS.
ous analyzed subgroups. (Table 11) Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 18 of 81 Reasons for Participation Among those organizations that took part in one or more business programs offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia, the va...
AI summary The majority of organizations participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business programs cite energy savings and reduced power bills as their primary motivation. Additional reasons include environmental benefits, financial incentives, and improved comfort. Most participants also report energy savings and bill reductions as the main benefits, with some citing environmental improvements and comfort enhancements.
Efficiency Nova Scotia business program in the future. (Table 26) Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 21 of 81 Of note, Participant organizations that indicate they would definitely recommend Efficiency Nova Scotia progra...
AI summary The text discusses the outcomes of Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, noting that a majority of participants reported energy use reductions and lower power bills. Those who recommend the programs are more likely to report energy savings, while some participants reported no reduction or uncertainty.
es arising from their Efficiency Nova Scotia program participation. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 22 of 81 Energy Use after Participation Among those organizations that reported a significant or modest reduction in...
AI summary The document discusses the energy use reductions reported by organizations participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business programs. Most participants saw reductions as expected, while some experienced less or more than anticipated. Monitoring of energy use post-participation is also addressed, with nearly 60% of participants closely monitoring consumption.
know or do not have an opinion on the matter. (Table 20) Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 23 of 81 Of note, Participant organizations with two or more locations, along with those that reported significant reductions in...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs on energy use and electricity bills. It notes that organizations with significant energy use reductions are more likely to report significant bill reductions, and that 60% of participants report some reduction in their Nova Scotia Power electricity bill.
ts that reported significant reductions in energy use as a result of program participation are more likely to have also experienced significant reductions in their electricity bills. In addition, organizations with five full-time employees...
AI summary The text discusses the effectiveness of Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, noting that organizations with significant energy use reductions are more likely to see reductions in electricity bills. It also highlights that most participants would recommend the programs to other companies.
cy Nova Scotia business programs to other companies. Nearly all Participants (93%) indicate that they would definitely or probably recommend Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs. Of note, six in ten (62%) of Participants would definite...
AI summary The text discusses survey results showing that 93% of participants would recommend Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs to other companies, with 62% definitely recommending them. It also notes that some organizations would need better incentives or more information to recommend the programs. Most organizations infrequently promote energy efficiency in their communications.
y Promotion Most Participant organizations only infrequently promote their energy efficiency in communications and marketing, with nearly one-half never promoting energy efficiency. Participant organizations were also asked how frequently...
AI summary Most Participant organizations rarely or never promote their energy efficiency in communications and marketing. Only 14% always or usually promote energy efficiency, while 64% rarely or never do so. Organizations with multiple locations or those less likely to recommend or participate in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs are more likely to avoid promotion.
in communications or marketing. Perceptions of Efficiency Nova Scotia Favourable overall opinions of Efficiency Nova Scotia are widespread among Participant organizations. Nearly all Participant organizations offer a favourable overall opi...
AI summary The text discusses widespread favorable opinions of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) among Participant organizations, with 95% reporting either completely or mostly favorable views. It also notes that organizations with more employees and those likely to recommend ENS programs are more likely to have completely favorable opinions.
Source of Program Awareness Key Mentions From Total Unaided Mentions Participants Non-Participants (n=250) (n=143) Someone at Efficiency Nova Scotia contacted the business 20% 11% Word of mouth 18% 36% Through a third party contractor or s...
AI summary The text discusses how businesses learned about Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy programs, with word of mouth being the most common method among non-participants and contact from Efficiency Nova Scotia being the most common among participants.
HAD HEARD OF EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA’S BUSINESS ENERGY SOLUTIONS, SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY SOLUTIONS PROGRAM, OR ITS BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES PROGRAM] Non-Participants: How did your business first learn of Efficiency Nova Scotia´s Business Ener...
AI summary The study involved designing and administering a questionnaire to small businesses in Nova Scotia to assess their awareness and participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy programs. The questionnaire was developed with input from Efficiency Nova Scotia and pre-tested before finalization.
1,320 Did Not Qualify, e.g., does not recall participating in ENS program 820 Completed Survey 500 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 32 of 81 Appendix A: Study Questionnaire Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment...
AI summary The document includes a study questionnaire from a regulatory proceeding, referencing a survey and contact information for Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). It mentions respondents who did not qualify for a program and those who completed the survey, with a toll-free number provided for ENS.
81 IF RESPONDENTS WISH TO CONTACT EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA/EFFICIENCYONE TO VALIDATE THE SURVEY LEGITIMACY OR FOR ANY REASON, STATE THAT ENS CAN BE REACHED AT: TOLL FREE 1-877-999-6035 Hello, my name is _ and I am representing Corporate Rese...
AI summary This text outlines the procedure for conducting a survey on energy efficiency by Efficiency Nova Scotia, through Corporate Research Associates. It includes contact information for respondents and instructions for handling survey responses and callbacks.
RECORD NUMBER OF LOCATIONS HERE, IF MORE THAN ONE: 998 Don’t know/No answer POSE QUESTIONS 5, 6, AND 7 IF ‘ONE’ IN Q.4 5. [DO NOT POSE TO ENS LIST; I.E., POSE ONLY TO INITIAL SAMPLE LIST] In 2016, did your company have a professional contr...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions posed to respondents regarding the installation or replacement of lighting equipment by professional contractors or facility maintenance staff between 2011 and 2016. The questions are part of a survey or data collection process, with responses categorized as 'Yes', 'No', or 'Don’t know/No answer'.
y maintenance staff install or replace any lighting equipment? This includes bulbs, fixtures, occupancy sensors or other controls. DO NOT READ RESPONSES – CODE ONE ONLY 1 Yes, did have contractor/maintenance staff 2 No, did not have contra...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the installation and replacement of lighting equipment by contractors or maintenance staff at Nova Scotia business locations in 2015 and 2016. The questions aim to collect precise data on the number of locations where such activities occurred.
ff install or replace any lighting equipment? This includes bulbs, fixtures, occupancy sensors or other controls. RECORD EXACT NUMBER - PROBE TO AVOID ACCEPTING A RANGE RECORD NUMBER OF LOCATIONS: 998 Don’t know/No answer 7a. [DO NOT POSE...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to lighting equipment installation and participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs by businesses in Nova Scotia. It requests specific data on the number of locations where lighting equipment was installed or replaced, and whether companies participated in ENS programs prior to 2017.
your company ever participated in any of the following Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for small business? READ PROGRAM DETAILS – DO NOT READ RESPONSES - CODE ONE ONLY The Business Energy Rebates Program, a mail-in rebate program, The Busi...
AI summary The text outlines a survey question about participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for small businesses and includes instructions for categorizing respondents as participants or non-participants based on their answers. It also includes a follow-up question for non-participants about their awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia.
Don’t recall/Never heard of any of these programs POSE Q.11a TO PARTICIPANTS ONLY 98 Don’t know/No answer 99 Other [SPECIFY: ] 11a. [POSE Q.11a ONLY TO PARTICIPANTS WHO RESPONDED WITH CODE 97 IN Q.11] [STATE THE FOLLOWING IF RESPONDENT IS...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, targeting respondents who previously participated or considered participation. It includes response options and instructions for handling different types of responses.
has not considered 8 Don’t know/No answer Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 38 of 81 13. [POSE Q.13 ONLY IF ‘YES …’ IN Q.12] a. What is the single most important reason why your company considered participating in Effic...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s business energy programs. It asks for the most important reasons for participation or non-participation, with multiple response options provided.
ess Energy Rebates business programs? PROBE: b. Any other reasons? DO NOT READ RESPONSES - ALLOW MULTIPLE RESPONSES, BUT RECORD FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT MENTIONS SEPARATELY 01 Cost of upgrades 02 Having to close during upgrades 03 Amount of ti...
AI summary The document includes a list of reasons why businesses may not participate in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, including cost, time, and perceived lack of value. It also asks participants to identify the most important reason for their participation in these programs.
re Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs? PROBE: Anything else? DO NOT READ RESPONSES - ALLOW MULTIPLE RESPONSES, BUT RECORD FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT MENTIONS SEPARATELY 01 Wanted the energy savings/reduce power bill 02 Efficiency Nova Scot...
AI summary Participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs reported benefits such as energy savings, reduced power bills, financial incentives, and improved comfort. Some mentioned the 24-month interest-free financing as a key enabler for upgrades.
More environmentally friendly 97 None/Did not see any benefits 98 Don’t know/No answer 99 Other [SPECIFY: ] 17. [POSE Q.17 ONLY TO PARTICIPANTS] a. What was the primary challenge, if any, your company experienced in participating in an Eff...
AI summary The text presents survey responses regarding participants' experiences with Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, including challenges faced and energy use reductions. It includes options for challenges such as cost of upgrades, time taken, and financing, as well as responses on energy use reduction.
VOLUNTEERED 8 Don’t know/No answer Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 40 of 81 19. [POSE Q.19 ONLY IF CODE 1 OR CODE 2 IN Q.18] And would you say that the reductions in energy use achieved as a result of these efficiency...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to energy efficiency programs, focusing on the outcomes of efficiency upgrades, monitoring of energy consumption, and changes in electricity bills. It includes options for responses and volunteer answers, indicating a survey or evaluation process.
] And would you say that the reductions in electricity bills achieved as a result of these efficiency upgrades have been …: READ RESPONSES IN ORDER - ALLOW ONE RESPONSE 1 More than expected 2 Less than expected, or were they 3 About as exp...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the effectiveness of Efficiency Nova Scotia's business programs, including participant satisfaction with energy bill reductions, likelihood of recommending the programs, and frequency of promoting energy efficiency in marketing.
Always 2 Usually 3 Sometimes 4 Rarely, or 5 Never VOLUNTEERED 8 Don’t know/No answer 26. [POSE Q.26 TO EVERYONE] How likely is your company to participate in any of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s business programs in the future? Would you say yo...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s business programs and awareness of the organization. It asks respondents to rate their likelihood of future participation and their familiarity with and opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s programs.
w? CODE ONE ONLY – RECORD NAME AND EMAIL ADDRESS 1 Yes, am interested in draw [RECORD NAME: _ EMAIL ADDRESS: _] 2 No, am not interested in draw Thank you for your assistance and cooperation! Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1,...
AI summary The text includes a form for recording names and email addresses, followed by a table from a 2017 study on non-participants by Efficiency Nova Scotia, asking about the number of full-time employees in Nova Scotia.
2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 4: And how many business locations does your organization currently have in Nova Scotia?
AI summary The text references a 2017 SBES Study focusing on non-participants and includes a question about the number of business locations an organization currently has in Nova Scotia.
62 192 65 11 153 111 215 52 177 76 81 187 169 44 62 151 117 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 54 164 69 75 175 170 40 45 143 106 MEAN 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.9 1.0 3.6 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.5...
AI summary This table presents data from a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on the number of Nova Scotia business locations where professional contractors or facility maintenance staff installed or replaced lighting equipment in 2016. The data includes sample sizes, means, and medians, with values over 20 excluded from calculations.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on the number of lighting equipment, familiarity with ENS, and awareness across different regions and locations. It includes statistics on the number of FTEs, location status, and program participation.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on lighting equipment, familiarity with ENS, and other related metrics across different regions and rate codes. It includes information on the number of FTEs, location status, and awareness of ENS programs.
0 2 4 3 5 4 3 4 Don't know/No answer 5 3 5 9 3 10 9 3 6 2 15 4 0 3 6 7 0 3 5 5 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 268 148 58 62 192 65 11 153 111 215 52 177 76 81 187 169 44 62 151 117 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 5...
AI summary The text presents statistical data related to a survey or study conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. in 2017, with a focus on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The data includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes, as well as percentages related to location information.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 50 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 7/7a: Between 2011 and 2014, at how many, if any, of your Nova Scotia business locations did your company have a professional...
AI summary The text presents a question from a 2017 SBES Study asking businesses in Nova Scotia about the number of locations where professional contractors or facility maintenance staff installed or replaced lighting equipment between 2011 and 2014.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 51 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 5/5a/6/6a/7/7a COMBINED: Between 2011 and 2016, at how many, if any, of your Nova Scotia business locations did your company...
AI summary The text asks Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation about the number of Nova Scotia business locations where professional contractors or facility maintenance staff installed or replaced lighting equipment between 2011 and 2016.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The document presents statistical data on the familiarity with ENS (Efficiency Nova Scotia) and the number of lighting equipment installations across different regions and rate codes in Nova Scotia. It includes percentages of locations with no installations, at least one installation, and responses categorized as 'don't know/no answer'.
187 169 44 62 151 117 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 54 164 69 75 175 170 40 45 143 106 TABLE 8: To the best of your knowledge, did your company participate in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program prior to 2017?
AI summary The text presents a table with numerical data and a question asking whether the company participated in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program prior to 2017.
187 169 44 62 151 117 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 54 164 69 75 175 170 40 45 143 106 6 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 52 of 81...
AI summary This table from the 2017 SBES Study asks non-participating small businesses if they have ever participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, such as the Business Energy Rebates Program or the Business Energy Solutions Program.
fied savings opportunities and implemented upgrades, or The Small Business Energy Solutions Program, a mail-in rebate program where an energy auditor may have helped you identify savings opportunities
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs, specifically mentioning the Small Business Energy Solutions Program, which offers mail-in rebates and involves energy auditors to help identify savings opportunities for businesses.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on the number of lighting equipment, familiarity with ENS, and participation in programs across different regions and rate codes in Nova Scotia. The table includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes, but no specific arguments or claims are made.
34 16 7 11 16 11 7 14 19 20 14 25 5 11 23 27 4 4 22 12 TABLE 10: Prior to today, had you ever heard of Efficiency Nova Scotia´s Business Energy Solutions, Small Business Energy Solutions Program, or its Business Energy Rebates Program?
AI summary The text presents a table and a question asking if someone had prior knowledge of specific energy efficiency programs offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including Business Energy Solutions, Small Business Energy Solutions, and Business Energy Rebates.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents survey data on familiarity with ENS and the number of lighting equipment installed across different regions and rate codes in Nova Scotia. It includes responses from participants indicating whether they have heard of ENS, along with weighted and unweighted sample sizes for each category.
2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 10a: [ASK IF 'NO' OR 'DON'T KNOW' IN Q10] Prior to today, had you ever heard of Efficiency Nova Scotia? NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER O...
AI summary The text presents data from a 2017 SBES Study on non-participants, specifically focusing on their familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia. The table shows that a majority (89%) of respondents had heard of ENS, while 11% had not. The data is segmented by region, rate code, and other factors.
60 44 87 19 70 32 7 100 67 19 21 0 106 TABLE 10a: [TOTAL SAMPLE] Prior to today, had you ever heard of Efficiency Nova Scotia? NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION ST...
AI summary This table presents survey data on prior awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) among respondents, including breakdowns by region, rate code, and number of full-time employees. The data indicates high familiarity with ENS, with most respondents having heard of it before.
LE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 54 164 69 75 175 170 40 45 143 106 8 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 54 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2...
AI summary The document presents data from a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on non-participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Solutions and Small Business Energy Rebates Program, focusing on how businesses first learned about these programs.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The document presents survey data on the number of lighting equipment, familiarity with Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and awareness of ENS across various regions and locations. It includes information on how respondents became aware of ENS through various channels such as word of mouth, media advertising, and direct contact.
143 70 27 46 68 45 30 65 75 108 35 94 37 68 75 103 21 24 143 0 9 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 55 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Non...
AI summary The text presents a table from a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on non-participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business energy efficiency programs. It includes a question asking if companies have ever considered participating in these programs.
2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 12: [ASK IF 'YES' IN Q10 OR Q10a] Has your company ever considered participating in the business energy efficiency programs offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia?
AI summary The document asks whether companies have considered participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business energy efficiency programs, focusing on non-participants from the 2017 SBES Study.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the familiarity with ENS (Efficiency Nova Scotia) and the number of lighting equipment installed across different regions and rate codes in Nova Scotia. It includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes for various categories, such as the number of full-time employees and location status.
42 59 151 104 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 239 119 56 64 119 72 48 116 118 188 51 157 67 75 164 163 39 43 143 95 TABLE 13: TOTAL MENTIONS [ASK IF 'YES' IN Q12] What is the single most important reason why your company considered participatin...
AI summary The text presents a table with sample sizes and a question regarding the most important reason for participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business energy programs, indicating a focus on customer research and energy efficiency initiatives.
gle most important reason why your company considered participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia´s Small Business Energy Solutions, Business Energy Solutions or Business Energy Rebates business programs?
AI summary The text asks for the most important reason why a company considered participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business energy programs, such as Small Business Energy Solutions, Business Energy Solutions, or Business Energy Rebates.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer awareness and interest in energy efficiency programs, particularly those related to Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). It includes statistics on familiarity with ENS, the number of locations, and reasons for participation in energy-saving initiatives.
14 10 0 26 11 17 comfortable Other 10 9 7 15 11 9 13 8 12 11 7 10 11 9 11 10 13 10 10 10 2 0 0 6 3 0 4 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 2 0 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 89 47 21 22 54 30 5 41 47 68 21 62 19 42 48 60 13 16 72 16 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#)...
AI summary The text presents a table from a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on non-participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs. The table includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes across various categories, indicating data collection efforts related to energy efficiency initiatives.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the familiarity and awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs among different regions and employee counts. It highlights that a significant portion of respondents are not aware of ENS programs or have not considered them, with various reasons provided such as lack of information, company size, and perceived energy efficiency.
2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 26: How likely is your company to participate in any of Efficiency Nova Scotia´s business programs in the future?
AI summary The text presents a question from the 2017 SBES Study asking how likely non-participating companies are to engage in Efficiency Nova Scotia's business programs in the future.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents a survey on the familiarity with ENS (Efficiency Nova Scotia) and the number of lighting equipment installed across different regions and rate codes in Nova Scotia. It includes data on the number of full-time employees, location status, and awareness of ENS programs.
7 4 3 4 1 3 3 0 6 5 4 0 3 5 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 268 148 58 62 192 65 11 153 111 215 52 177 76 81 187 169 44 62 151 117 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 54 164 69 75 175 170 40 45 143 106 % Definitely/Prob...
AI summary The table presents data from a 2017 study on the familiarity of Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs among non-participating companies in Nova Scotia. It includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes, as well as percentages of respondents who are definitely or probably familiar with the programs and those who are probably not or definitely not familiar.
2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 27: How familiar, if at all, would you say you are with Efficiency Nova Scotia´s programs made available to companies in the province?
AI summary The 2017 SBES Study examines the familiarity of companies in Nova Scotia with Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs, as reflected in Table 27.
NUMBER OF LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FAMILIARITY WITH AWARE OF ENS NSPI REGION NSPI RATE CODE NUMBER OF FTEs LOCATION STATUS OVERALL LOCATIONS INSTALLED? ENSC PROGRAMS? Central Eastern Western 10 11 21 1-5 6+ 1 2+ Yes No Familiar Not familiar Own...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on the number of lighting equipment, familiarity with ENS, and program participation across different regions and utility types in Nova Scotia. It includes metrics such as FTEs, location status, and awareness of energy efficiency programs.
5 5 10 5 10 7 6 10 0 0 7 5 Propane 4 6 0 3 2 8 9 3 5 3 7 5 2 4 4 3 3 6 4 4 Other 9 8 3 19 9 9 14 10 9 8 11 9 5 12 8 11 6 9 13 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 1 3 2 0 4 0 0 3 3 1 1 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 268 148 58 62 192 65 11 153 111 215 52 177 76...
AI summary The text presents a table with numerical data and references a study conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. in 2017, titled '2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants'. The data appears to be related to energy efficiency or similar topics, though the specific context is not fully explained in the provided text.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 32: Does your company pay for its own electricity at your primary Nova Scotia locations, or does someone else, such as a landlord pay for it?
AI summary The text presents a question from the 2017 SBES Study asking whether a company pays for its own electricity at its primary Nova Scotia locations or if someone else, such as a landlord, pays for it.
1 0 3 0 2 Forestry & Logging 1 1 0 1 0 3 4 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 Grocers/Convenience stores 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Other 14 16 5 15 13 16 12 16 10 15 10 13 15 14 13 14 15 11 8 21 No answer/Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0...
AI summary The text includes a table with industry data and sample sizes, followed by a reference to a document titled 'EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION' and a citation to a report by Corporate Research Associates Inc. from 2017.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 62 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Non-Participants TABLE 34: To the best of your knowledge, approximately what percentage of your company´s operating budget for Nova Scotia locations...
AI summary The document asks Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to estimate the percentage of its operating budget spent on energy costs in Nova Scotia locations, as part of a 2017 study on non-participants.
47 50 39 48 46 50 46 48 46 48 47 44 53 40 50 42 53 60 44 53 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 268 148 58 62 192 65 11 153 111 215 52 177 76 81 187 169 44 62 151 117 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 121 59 70 126 75 49 125 119 195 54 164 69 75 175 170...
AI summary The text presents statistical data from a 2017 study conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on participants of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's SBES program. The data includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes, mean, and median values, which are likely used to analyze participant behavior or outcomes related to energy efficiency.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The document presents data on energy use, locations, and participation in energy efficiency programs across different regions in Nova Scotia. It includes metrics such as the number of locations, FTEs, and percentages of budgets spent on energy.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on energy use, participation, and location status, including information on the number of FTEs and locations. It includes a row with data attributed to 'Someone at Efficiency Nova Scotia' and mentions 'Word of mouth' as a method of contact.
2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 15: FIRST MENTION What is the single most important reason why your company decided to participate in one or more Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs?
AI summary The document presents a question from the 2017 SBES Study asking participants to identify the most important reason for their involvement in one or more Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The document presents data on energy use and participation in energy efficiency programs across different regions in Nova Scotia. It highlights the number of employees, locations, and responses to energy-saving initiatives, as well as the percentage of budgets spent on energy. The data reflects varying levels of participation and opinions on energy efficiency programs.
71 72 73 76 72 73 74 70 79 71 Efficiency Nova Scotia would pay part of the 7 9 6 8 6 7 7 7 6 9 0 9 8 5 9 6 3 9 7 9 4 7 10 costs/rebates/incentives Wanted to make our location more 5 6 5 7 3 7 10 2 7 0 6 6 3 9 4 6 5 6 5 4 6 6 6 comfortable...
AI summary The text presents data on motivations for participating in energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including cost savings, environmental benefits, equipment upgrades, and financing options. It reflects responses from participants regarding their reasons for engaging in energy efficiency initiatives.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 15: TOTAL MENTIONS What is the single most important reason why your company decided to participate in one or more Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs? Probe: Any...
AI summary The text presents a question from a 2017 SBES Study asking participants to identify the most important reason for their involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, with an invitation for additional comments.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer preferences regarding energy savings and environmental friendliness across different regions and locations in Nova Scotia. It includes statistics on the number of respondents and their preferences for reducing power bills and being environmentally friendly.
76 81 81 88 78 81 85 74 85 77 Wanted to be environmentally friendly 19 22 18 20 19 7 13 24 17 23 21 19 22 15 19 20 20 20 19 13 30 15 14 Efficiency Nova Scotia would pay part of the 17 17 17 16 17 13 15 18 14 23 12 19 18 15 18 16 13 19 18 1...
AI summary The text presents a table of survey responses related to motivations for energy efficiency initiatives, including environmental friendliness, cost incentives, comfort improvements, equipment upgrades, and financing options. It highlights varying levels of interest across different categories.
2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 16: FIRST MENTION What was the main benefit, if any, to your company from participating in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program?
AI summary The text asks participants in the 2017 SBES Study about the main benefit they received from participating in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program.
34 60 50 66 50 56 61 39 50 48 Efficiency Nova Scotia paid part of the 12 18 10 12 13 4 13 12 13 13 15 10 12 14 9 16 12 12 15 11 4 18 13 costs/rebates/incentives Improved energy efficiency of 5 6 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 15 3 3 8 2 7 4 6 5 0 6 7 9 b...
AI summary The text presents data on the impact of efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, highlighting the costs/rebates/incentives paid by Efficiency Nova Scotia, improvements in energy efficiency, and the perceived benefits of these programs, such as increased comfort and environmental friendliness, as well as challenges like the inability to make upgrades without rebates.
fits 5 0 7 5 3 7 7 3 3 9 0 3 2 8 4 5 2 3 3 7 13 1 6 5 4 5 7 4 0 5 6 6 5 0 4 3 10 2 7 1 8 4 4 11 5 0 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 76 169 132 112 6 103 144 174 73 31 169 155 93 114 134 77 167 169 42 42 66 64 UNWEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 76...
AI summary The text presents a table with numerical data related to a study conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. in 2017, titled '2017 SBES Study - Participants.' The table includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes, and it is referenced as ENS001-1054. The document is part of a larger proceeding and is associated with the SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 69 of 81.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 16: TOTAL MENTIONS What was the main benefit, if any, to your company from participating in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program? Probe: Any others?
AI summary The text references a 2017 SBES Study focusing on participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, asking about the main benefits received by companies from their participation.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The document presents data on energy savings and participation in efficiency programs across different regions and locations in Nova Scotia. It includes statistics on the number of employees, locations, and energy use, as well as opinions on the Energy and Sustainability Compliance (ENSC) recommendations and budget allocation for energy.
78 44 71 60 80 59 68 70 46 63 63 Efficiency Nova Scotia paid part of the 16 23 13 18 15 7 18 15 16 14 26 13 18 14 14 18 18 15 17 15 11 21 18 costs/rebates/incentives Location more comfortable 10 8 11 14 6 9 13 8 12 6 12 10 9 11 10 10 11 10...
AI summary The text presents data related to Efficiency Nova Scotia's payment of costs, rebates, and incentives, along with customer feedback on the impact of these programs. It includes responses to questions about comfort, environmental benefits, energy efficiency improvements, and the role of financing and other factors.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The document presents data on the number of FTEs, locations, and energy use across different regions in Nova Scotia, along with opinions and recommendations related to energy participation and budget allocation. It also highlights concerns such as excessive paperwork and the cost of upgrades.
1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 Getting landlord approval 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 3 Getting financing 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 Bad advice about energy efficiency upgrades 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0...
AI summary The document presents data on challenges faced by participants in energy efficiency programs, including issues with landlord approval, financing, bad advice, and cost over-runs. The data highlights the frequency and distribution of these challenges across different categories.
ignificant reduction, modest reduction, or no reduction at all in your company´s energy use as a result of these upgrades arising from your participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program?
AI summary The text asks whether participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program has led to a significant, modest, or no reduction in the company's energy use as a result of upgrades.
100 0 16 7 14 11 17 11 13 11 13 15 13 Modest reduction 57 58 56 55 58 56 57 57 60 46 0 84 63 47 60 55 60 57 62 44 44 52 55 No reduction at all 11 12 11 14 8 9 13 9 8 18 0 16 4 24 5 16 4 12 9 13 22 7 18 Don't know/No answer 20 19 20 18 23 2...
AI summary The text presents a table with responses to a question about the perceived impact of energy use reductions from efficiency upgrades, categorized as 'modest reduction,' 'no reduction at all,' and 'don't know/no answer,' along with sample sizes for each category.
51 83 38 58 113 122 48 30 142 124 48 83 89 62 110 132 23 19 46 48 10 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 73 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study -...
AI summary The text references a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's small business programs, specifically asking participants if they monitored energy consumption closely after participation.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The text presents data on energy use monitoring across different regions and locations in Nova Scotia, including the number of FTEs, locations, and energy use participation rates. It includes percentages of budgets spent on energy and responses to monitoring energy consumption.
67 94 57 63 47 64 52 61 56 57 58 61 64 75 No, did not monitor energy consumption 39 41 38 41 36 53 46 34 45 27 6 42 34 48 32 46 34 41 41 31 39 29 25 closely Don't know/No answer 3 4 3 4 2 2 3 3 2 6 0 1 2 5 4 3 5 3 2 11 0 7 0 WEIGHTED SAMPL...
AI summary The table presents data on the number of respondents who indicated whether they have experienced a significant, modest, or no reduction in their company's NS Power electricity bill due to efficiency upgrades from participating in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program. It includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes for each response category.
, modest reduction, or no reduction at all in your company's NS Power electricity bill as a result of efficiency upgrades arising from your participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program?
AI summary The text asks whether participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia business program would result in a modest reduction, or no reduction at all, in a company's NS Power electricity bill due to efficiency upgrades.
74 121 55 90 157 175 73 30 167 163 84 112 137 84 161 180 40 33 68 67 11 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 74 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Stud...
AI summary The text discusses a 2017 SBES Study - Participants table, asking respondents about the extent of electricity bill reductions achieved through efficiency upgrades, whether they were more than, less than, or about as expected.
N IN Q21] And would you say that the reductions in electricity bills achieved as a result of these efficiency upgrades have been more than expected, less than expected, or were they about as expected?
AI summary The question asks whether the reductions in electricity bills from efficiency upgrades have exceeded, fallen short of, or met expectations.
93 95 89 96 94 93 100 93 100 84 98 90 100 91 94 94 85 94 93 % Probably not/Definitely not 6 2 8 7 5 4 11 3 6 6 0 7 0 16 2 10 0 8 5 4 11 5 6 12 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attach...
AI summary The text presents data from a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on Efficiency Nova Scotia business programs, highlighting participant responses to a question about factors that would make them more likely to recommend the programs to other companies.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The text presents data on energy use, participation in energy efficiency programs, and budget allocation for energy-related initiatives across different regions in Nova Scotia, highlighting the number of employees, locations, and energy use categories.
11 19 13 14 10 18 14 20 More information about ENS programs 13 8 15 17 9 7 21 7 16 7 27 11 0 13 24 11 0 14 13 5 23 11 10 generally If the programs were beneficial to companies 13 20 12 20 5 7 19 9 11 21 27 12 0 14 10 15 10 12 13 20 14 17 2...
AI summary The text provides quantitative data on customer perceptions of ENS programs, including their benefits, incentives, ease of implementation, communication, and monitoring tools. It highlights varying levels of satisfaction across different aspects of the programs.
66 30 43 14 29 58 63 24 7 60 0 84 17 69 11 73 59 17 15 26 25 13 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 76 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Part...
AI summary The document presents a table from a 2017 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. regarding how often Efficiency Nova Scotia promotes energy efficiency in its communications or marketing. The table is part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia.
2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 25: How often, if at all, does your company promote your energy efficiency in your communications or marketing?
AI summary The text references a 2017 SBES Study and includes a table asking participants how frequently their company promotes energy efficiency in communications or marketing.
TION 2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 28: What is your overall opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia?
AI summary The text presents a question from the 2017 SBES Study asking participants about their overall opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The document presents data on energy use, participation in energy efficiency programs, and budget allocation for energy spending across different regions in Nova Scotia. It includes statistics on the number of locations, FTEs, and opinions on energy efficiency initiatives.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The document presents data on energy use and participation in energy efficiency programs across different regions and property statuses in Nova Scotia. It includes statistics on the number of locations, FTEs, and budget allocation percentages related to energy use and participation in programs.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 1, Page 78 of 81 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 31: What is the primary heating source for your primary Nova Scotia business location?
AI summary This table from the 2017 SBES Study lists participants based on the primary heating source for their Nova Scotia business location.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FUTURE PCT OF BUDGET REGION NSPI RATE CODE ENERGY USE RECOMMEND ENSC OPINION OF ENSC LOCATION STATUS FTEs LOCATIONS PARTICIPATION SPENT ON ENERGY OVERALL Halifax Rest of Sig LT sig LT LT Comp LT comp 5% or 6% or 10 11 2...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on energy use, participation in energy efficiency programs, and budget allocation for energy spending across different regions and locations in Nova Scotia. It includes metrics such as the number of FTEs, locations, and percentages of budget spent on energy.
1 2 0 3 2 architecture, etc.) Communication & Other utility 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Other 10 10 11 8 13 9 11 10 12 8 15 8 11 9 9 12 13 9 10 11 9 11 10 WEIGHTED SAMPLE SIZE (#) 250 76 169 132 112 6 103 144 174 73 31 16...
AI summary This document presents a table from the 2017 Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. The table includes weighted and unweighted sample sizes for various categories, such as communication and other utility-related data, and provides a breakdown of participants in the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's study.
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION 2017 SBES Study - Participants TABLE 34: To the best of your knowledge, approximately what percentage of your company´s operating budget for Nova Scotia locations is spent on energy costs?
AI summary The document asks Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to estimate the percentage of its operating budget in Nova Scotia locations that is spent on energy costs, based on the 2017 SBES Study.
.4 10.0 10.5 9.4 11.0 9.7 8.9 14.2 7.5 11.9 9.0 11.9 9.6 10.8 8.6 10.4 10.4 7.4 13.1 2.7 18.0 MEDIAN 5.0 8.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 12.0 5.0 8.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 10.0 3.0 15.0 18 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017...
AI summary The table presents data from the 2017 Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) on the incidence of participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. It distinguishes between participants and non-participants based on survey responses, providing insight into program engagement among small businesses.
1 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2017 [ENS001-1054] Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 1 of 43 Small Business Energy Study Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 2 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL B...
AI summary The document is a Small Business Energy Study conducted by Corporate Research Associates Inc. in 2017, filed on May 30, 2018, as part of SBA IR-16 Attachment 2. It is related to Efficiency Nova Scotia's efforts in energy efficiency programs.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 2 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY
AI summary The document is an attachment from a regulatory proceeding, focusing on Efficiency Nova Scotia and its involvement in a small business energy study.
lass ............................................................ 31 Figure 34: BER Mail-in Rate Class Breakdown of Completed Projects .................................................. 32 Tables Table 1: SBES Participation Barriers and Mi...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Study evaluates Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs available to small businesses and analyzes survey results to understand participation barriers and motivations among small businesses.
Business Advocate (“SBA”);1 and ii. The results of a survey that evaluated, among other things, why small businesses do or do not participate in efficiency programs. EfficiencyOne produced the first part of this Study and retained Corporat...
AI summary The document outlines the Small Business Energy Study conducted by EfficiencyOne and Corporate Research Associates (CRA) at the request of the Small Business Advocate (SBA) during the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process. The study aimed to evaluate small business participation in efficiency programs and was developed in collaboration with the SBA under the terms of the Quantum Agreement, despite the agreement not being approved by the UARB.
Pursuant to a Request for Proposals process, CRA was awarded the contract for the survey component of the Study in the fall of 2016. The Study was conducted in the winter of 2017. 1 Small businesses that: i) consumes less than 150,000kWh o...
AI summary The document outlines the review of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs available to small businesses, focusing on Direct Installation (SBES) and Efficient Product Rebates (BER). It references a study conducted by CRA in 2017 and cites a relevant NSUARB decision from 2015.
ter referred as “SBES”) and Efficient Product Rebates (comprised of the Business Energy Rebates program component and hereafter referred to as “BER”). 3.1 DIRECT INSTALLATION (SBES) SBES is administered by EfficiencyOne through its ENS fra...
AI summary The Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) is administered by EfficiencyOne through its ENS franchise, offering small businesses in Nova Scotia incentives and resources for energy-efficient upgrades. ENS covers up to 60% of the costs, aiming to help participants overcome barriers and maximize returns on investment.
Eligible Project Criteria In addition to participant qualifications, SBES also has project eligibility criteria. Eligible projects must meet the following requirements: • projects must involve the purchase and installation of products that...
AI summary The document outlines eligibility criteria for projects under the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES), including requirements for eligible products, new installations, and energy savings. It also describes the free-of-charge energy audits provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and the role of the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN) in facilitating further services.
n person; and ensuring the participant is aware of the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN) to facilitate any other services the participant may require. The ETN is discussed further under Step 3. 3 Page Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attach...
AI summary The process outlines steps for participants to access energy efficiency programs through Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN), including selecting contractors, submitting documentation for approval, and receiving rebates and financing.
ss from, for example, choosing their preferred contractor (as this would be handled by ENS). This turnkey service also included a free on-site energy assessment of energy-efficient measures. Phase II: On August 1, 2015, SBES replaced BES a...
AI summary The text discusses the transition from the Business Energy Solutions (BES) program to the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), highlighting changes in eligibility criteria and the annual electricity usage threshold.
fort to reduce the unit cost for SBES. Phase III: In the fall of 2015, ENS further refined SBES to reopen it to the following small businesses facilities that were eligible under BES: • facilities owned or operated by an educational instit...
AI summary The document discusses the evolution of the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) in Nova Scotia, including changes to eligibility criteria and delivery models to improve participation and reduce unit costs. It also mentions outreach efforts and process improvements made to increase awareness and streamline the program.
ient components that offers both rebates and projects. financing to participants, recognizing the unique financial needs of small businesses. SBES also offers a complimentary energy audit to qualifying small businesses to help overcome the...
AI summary The document describes a program that offers both rebates and financing to small businesses, along with complimentary energy audits to help them overcome financial barriers to energy efficiency.
to qualifying small businesses to help overcome the financial barriers associated with learning about energy-efficient opportunities. Lack of information: Eligible participants receive complimentary Offering complimentary Lack of education...
AI summary The document outlines strategies to overcome financial and informational barriers for small businesses in adopting energy-efficient practices, including complimentary energy audits, increased outreach, training materials, and staff promotion efforts by ENS and SBES.
Finally, ENS staff serve as ambassadors to promote energy efficiency to small businesses (see section 3.3, “Outreach”, below). Lack of resources: The SBES team focuses on opportunities for After the launch of these Small businesses process...
AI summary ENS staff promote energy efficiency to small businesses, and the SBES team worked with an industrial engineering firm to improve internal processes and participant experience, leading to increased applications and participation. Participation rates for BES and SBES from 2014-2016 are reviewed, though reliable trends are not yet established due to changes in 2015.
and tables that review BES and SBES participation numbers from 2014-2016. Since SBES (and its predecessor BES) underwent substantial change in 2015, reliable trends are not yet established. Figure 1 and Table 2, below, are intended to prov...
AI summary The text discusses participation numbers in the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) and its predecessor, the Business Energy Solutions (BES), from 2014-2016. It notes that due to changes in 2015, reliable trends are not yet established. Figures and tables provide context on the number of NS Power accounts within and outside the Small Business Advocate (SBA)'s purview based on annual electricity consumption.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 13 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY Figure 2 shows that all facilities within the SBA’s purview were eligible for BES and that these accounts comprised 85 percent of all eligible BES par...
AI summary The text discusses the participation levels in the Business Energy Solutions (BES) program, highlighting that 85% of eligible accounts were within the SBA’s purview. Participation decreased between 2014 and 2015 due to BES ending mid-year and a budget reduction for Efficiency Nova Scotia.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 15 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY Figure 6: BES Participation by Projects, Businesses, and Facilities Figure 7: BES Rate Class 10 Participation by Projects, Businesses, and Facilities...
AI summary The document presents figures showing the participation of businesses in the Business Energy Solutions (BES) program across different rate classes. It includes data on the number of projects, businesses, and facilities involved, as well as a breakdown of completed projects by rate class and year-over-year trends.
S projects completed between rate classes and year-over-year. Figure 21: SBES Participation by Projects per Rate Class Figure 22: SBES Rate Class Breakdown of Completed Projects 19 P a g e Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, P...
AI summary The text discusses the Efficient Product Rebates (BER) program administered by EfficiencyOne through its ENS franchise, which provides financial incentives to BNI participants to reduce electricity consumption. The program offers both Instant Rebates and Mail-in Rebates, with Instant Rebates being more convenient and leading to higher participation rates.
verify details such as runtime hours and baseline technology. The Instant Rebates service is simpler for participants than the Mail-in service, thus resulting in higher participation rates. BER was developed to incent Nova Scotian business...
AI summary The BER program aims to incentivize the purchase of energy-efficient technologies by businesses and non-profits in Nova Scotia. Instant Rebates are offered for energy-efficient lighting and pumping products, reducing administrative burden and increasing participation rates. The program encourages market transformation and efficiency in standard practices.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 25 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY BER Mail-in statistics from 2014 through 2016 indicate that 20 to 30 percent of BER Mail-in projects are completed by small businesses that fall withi...
AI summary The text discusses eligibility criteria for BER Mail-in projects, noting that 20 to 30% of such projects are completed by small businesses within the SBA's purview. Eligible projects must involve the purchase and installation of energy-efficient products, save electrical energy, and meet specific energy usage criteria.
fuel service provider. Eligible measures are listed within the BER forms found online at efficiencyns.ca/BER and can be divided into the following 13 categories: • Agriculture • Heating • Lighting • IT & Datacenters • Refrigeration • Varia...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program outlines eligible energy efficiency measures and application requirements. Eligible measures are categorized into 13 types, and specific criteria such as industry standards must be met. Applications must be submitted to ENS within 90 days of installation, with pre-approval required for certain high-value or specific technologies.
feedback on financial support is generally positive. Lack of Information: BER staff serve as ambassadors to promote By continuing to highlight Participants may not energy efficiency. the benefits and costs of understand the energy efficien...
AI summary Feedback on financial support for energy efficiency programs is generally positive. However, participants may not fully understand the costs, benefits, and appropriateness of energy efficiency projects for their business. Efforts are being made to increase awareness through marketing and educational materials.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 29 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY Administrative BER works with the distributors to try and The adoption of a new data Burden for minimize the data required for reporting and system wi...
AI summary The document discusses the administrative burden on distributors for the Instant Rebates program and the simplification of the mail-in rebate application process. Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has worked to streamline processes, reduce unnecessary data collection, and improve user-friendly forms. Some distributors report resource challenges, while participants have provided positive feedback on the simplified process.
SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY Figure 23: BER Mail-in - Number of Eligible Accounts Figure 24: BER Mail-in 2014-2016 Participation Rates for SBA Accounts Figures 25 through 27 show the number of projects completed by rate class for the years...
AI summary The document discusses the participation rates of small businesses in the BER Mail-in program from 2014 to 2016. It highlights that small businesses, despite being the majority of eligible participants, had lower participation rates, possibly due to alternative programs like Instant Rebates and the SBES.
28 P a g e Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 32 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY Figure 27: 2016 BER Mail-in Projects Completed Figure 28 demonstrates BER Mail-in participation rates by number of...
AI summary The text provides figures related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Mail-in program, including participation rates by projects, businesses, and facilities, as well as participation data for specific rate classes and annual consumption levels.
Participation - Unknown Annual Consumption Figures 33 and 34 provide a high-level overview comparing the number of BER Mail-in projects completed between rate classes and year-over-year. Figure 33: BER Mail-in Participation by Projects per...
AI summary The document discusses outreach activities for the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) and Business Energy Rebates (BER), highlighting how Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) engages small businesses through marketing, outreach, and Business Development Managers (BDMs). Figures 33 and 34 provide data on BER Mail-in participation by rate class.
AR); o Restaurant Association of Nova Scotia (RANS); o Small Business Network (Access the Best); and o Tourism Industry of Nova Scotia (TIANS). ENS leverages these connections to promote its small business offerings through association pub...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) collaborates with various business associations to promote its small business energy programs. In 2016, ENS created print-ready articles on the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) and distributed them to several business organizations, some of which published the materials.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 37 of 43 Efficiency Nova Scotia SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY STUDY
AI summary This document is part of an efficiency study conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the Small Business Energy Survey. It provides insights into energy usage and efficiency opportunities for small businesses in Nova Scotia.
Bright Business Award for their efforts in reducing energy and in 2016, ENS announced the launch of the Affordable Multi-family Pilot, a new SBES offering for property owners and landlords. 34 P a g e Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Att...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) engages small businesses through various initiatives, including the Affordable Multi-family Pilot and the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES). Business Development Managers (BDMs) focus on rural and economically stressed areas, while independent energy advisors and direct installation services also play a role in outreach.
rect installation service, this would not be their first contact with ENS, though they may benefit by learning about other opportunities through conversations with the installer during the visit. These three main touch-points for small bus...
AI summary The document outlines the main touch-points for small businesses engaging with ENS, including marketing, BDMs, and energy advisors, with the goal of encouraging completion of the online Business Profile. The ESA plays a key role in addressing questions and overcoming resource barriers, with over 1,300 calls received in 2016. The promotional channels, such as The Network News, are also discussed in terms of their frequency and geographical reach.
typically issued province- wide. 19 This number varies by year and is not limited to small business events (e.g., it could also include larger businesses). In addition to these events, ENS also uses other forms of outreach through these gr...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) engages in outreach to small businesses through various events and print advertisements in multiple publications. These efforts include distributing print-ready articles on the Small Business Energy Survey (SBES) and advertising in publications such as Metro Halifax, Business Voice, and others across Nova Scotia.
30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 41 of 43 ENS RESPONSE TO CRA SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS ATTACHMENT A 38 P a g e Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 42 of 43 ENS RESPONSE TO CRA SMALL BUSINESS ENE...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has responded to recommendations from CRA's Small Business Energy Efficiency Research report, specifically addressing the need to increase awareness of Small Business Energy Solutions and Business Energy Rebates.
ollowing comments. Recommendation Text: 1. Efficiency Nova Scotia should take steps to build greater awareness of Small Business Energy Solutions and Business Energy Rebates. Despite the fact that ENS has been in existence only a few years...
AI summary The recommendation suggests that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) should increase awareness of its Small Business Energy Solutions and Business Energy Rebates programs to boost participation among small businesses. Current research shows that while there is already a good level of participation, many non-participants cite a lack of awareness as the main barrier to engagement.
mation as the main reasons for not participating in ENS programs, while only a minority of such organizations report heightened familiarity with the programs offered. ENS Comments: ENS agrees with this recommendation and will continue to w...
AI summary The text discusses ENS's response to recommendations aimed at increasing small business participation in energy efficiency programs. ENS agrees to use study results to highlight participation benefits and will continue efforts to raise awareness through success stories and outreach materials.
SBA IR-16 Attachment 2, Page 43 of 43 ENS RESPONSE TO CRA SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS ATTACHMENT A ENS Comments: ENS agrees with this recommendation and will use the information provided through this survey to inform its...
AI summary ENS agrees with the recommendation to encourage program Participant companies to reference their energy efficiency practices in future communications and marketing materials, as identified by the CRA Small Business Energy Research. This could help differentiate businesses and promote ENS programs.
40 P a g e EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-17: 2 3 Please provide operating plan of SBES program of 2018. If the oper...
AI summary The response to the Small Business Advocate's request for the 2018 operating plan of the SBES program refers to the 2017 Annual Progress Report and mid-course adjustments filed with the Utility and Review Board. Additional documents, including the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and evaluation reports, are mentioned as sources of information.
ear-end totals. 4 1 As agreed to in the UARB-approved 2016-2018 DSM Plan Consensus Agreement, ENS is now reporting on lifetime energy savings. See M06733, NSUARB Decision, The Public Utilities Act 5 and An Application for Approval of a Sup...
AI summary The document references the UARB-approved 2016-2018 DSM Plan and discusses the methodology for estimating lifetime energy savings, which is more sophisticated than previously used. It also mentions the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, formed from merging two existing programs, and refers to variances in energy savings targets.
otia. 13 4 Reflects tracked and estimated participation by low-income participants; numbers are included in the overall Efficient Product Rebates (Residential and BNI), Existing Residential, Custom 14 Incentives, and Direct Installation pr...
AI summary The document provides an overview of participation rates in energy efficiency programs in 2017, including data on low-income participants and the absence of evaluations for the Strategic Energy Management program due to its start date.
Participation 2017 Actual Unit Residential Efficient Product Rebates Instant Savings 710,540 Units rebated Appliance Retirement 6,138 Units rebated Existing Residential Home Energy Assessment 931 Housing units Green Heat 1,629 Housing unit...
AI summary The text presents participation data for various energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, including residential and business rebates, home energy assessments, and energy management systems. It notes that previous quarter data may have been updated and directs readers to Table 10 for low-income participation estimates.
2017 Actual Filed Adjustment Residential Efficient Product Rebates 0.26 0.23 0.19 Instant Savings Appliance Retirement Existing Residential 0.24 0.25 0.26 Home Energy Assessment Green Heat Efficient Product Installation New Residential 0.3...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency programs, including residential and BNI (Business and Non-Profit Initiative) programs, with figures for 2017 actuals, filed amounts, and adjustments. It highlights various rebate and incentive programs aimed at promoting energy efficiency across residential and commercial sectors.
SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 8 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 1.1 2017 DSM Programs 2 3 In 2017, ENS achieved total net incremental energy savings at the generator, for all DSM 4 programs, of 130.7 GWh, comp...
AI summary In 2017, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) achieved 130.7 GWh of net incremental energy savings and 23.7 MW of peak demand savings across all DSM programs, slightly below the planned targets. Total expenditures were $30.3 million, under the mid-course adjusted planned investment of $34.6 million. The savings are projected to avoid 85.4 kt of annual CO2e emissions.
ion 26 of the electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM) for those components (for more 27 information on the eTRM, please see section 1.5.2). 9 Customer case management and 8 M06733, The Public Utilities Act, RSNS, 1989, c 380, as amend...
AI summary The document discusses the implementation of the electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM) and updates to Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) Efficiency Trade Network (ETN) in 2017, including delays in the DDSM data tracking system due to vendor development issues.
ed delays in 2017 due 7 to vendor development issues. ENS engaged with the vendor to mitigate risks 8 associated with this delay. 9 10 1.2 Residential Sector Results 11 12 In 2017, the Residential sector achieved net incremental energy sav...
AI summary In 2017, the Residential sector achieved energy and peak demand savings slightly below planned targets. The Efficient Product Rebates program met energy savings targets but fell short on peak demand savings. Adjustments in program measure distribution contributed to higher demand-to-energy ratios than planned.
SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 15 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 A breakdown of net incremental energy and net peak demand savings, expenditures, 2 and participation by rate class for EPR is presented in Table...
AI summary This text presents a table summarizing the results of the Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report, focusing on residential rate class outcomes including energy savings, peak demand savings, and expenditures.
Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 22.2 198.2 2.9 4,141 703,536 Small General (10) 0.0 0.2 0.0 9 44 General Demand (11) 0.0 0.2 0.0 12 61 Large General (12) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 Small Industrial (21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 6 Medium Industrial (22) 0.0 0.0 0...
AI summary The text provides a table of energy and demand savings, expenditures, and participant counts across various customer classes, including residential, industrial, and municipal. It notes that numbers may not sum due to rounding and that savings figures are net of free-ridership and spillover. The Appliance Retirement program is highlighted as part of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates and includes HomeWarming services for BNI participants.
cludes appliance replacements delivered through the HomeWarming service. 10 The Appliance Retirement program component collects eligible residential appliances from BNI participants (e.g., 11 rental apartment buildings, condominium buildin...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report discusses Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) HomeWarming service and Appliance Retirement program, which target BNI participants and residential users. It notes a decrease in net peak demand savings due to ENS's 2016-2017 residential lighting metering study. Additionally, the EPR unit cost for 2017 was 20% below the planned mid-course adjusted unit cost, influenced by increased purchases of ENERGY STAR® certified LED lighting products.
May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 16 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 component, as compared to previous years. 10 The multi-packs have a lower per-kWh 2 rebate amount than the corresponding single-pac...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report highlights lower-than-expected incentive costs due to lower rebate amounts for multi-packs and a higher proportion of appliance retirements. The Instant Savings program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings through the sale of energy-efficient products.
nd 2.6 MW of net peak 16 demand savings through the sale of over 710,000 energy-efficient products, the 17 majority of which were ENERGY STAR® certified LED lighting products. 18 19 In Q2 of 2017, Instant Savings engaged in a review of inc...
AI summary The report highlights Efficiency Nova Scotia's achievements in energy efficiency, including net peak demand savings through the sale of energy-efficient products, a review of incentive levels, and the introduction of a new product category in the 2017 fall campaign. Dehumidifiers and air purifiers were added to the Instant Savings program in 2018.
result, dehumidifiers and air purifiers will be added to the list of energy-efficient 2 products available in Instant Savings for 2018. 3 4 Appliance Retirement 5 6 In 2017, the Appliance Retirement component of the EPR program achieved ne...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency initiatives, including the addition of dehumidifiers and air purifiers to the Instant Savings program and the Appliance Retirement component of the EPR program achieving energy savings in 2017. It also mentions a pilot project with the Halifax Regional School Board to retire inefficient appliances in schools.
and 7.2 MW of net peak demand savings in 2017, compared to planned savings of 33.4 25 GWh and 6.5 MW, respectively. Existing Residential comprises the following 26 components: 11 Effective January 2016, Appliance Retirement began offering...
AI summary The document outlines the performance of the Existing Residential program in 2017, highlighting energy savings and program components like Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation. It also references a table providing details on energy savings, expenditures, and participation by rate class.
Residential/Charitable (2,3,4) 27.5 346.3 7.1 7,036 15,934 Small General (10) 0.0 0.1 0.0 2 4 General Demand (11) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Large General (12) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Small Industrial (21) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Medium Industrial (22) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0...
AI summary The text provides a summary of energy and demand savings across various customer categories, including residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. It includes figures for savings, expenditures, and participant numbers. Notably, it mentions specific programs like the Home Energy Assessment and Green Heat, and notes that data may be unaudited and subject to updates.
effect 5 on demand savings, the program measure changes resulted in an overall increase in 6 demand savings for Existing Residential. 7 8 Home Energy Assessment 9 10 HEA saw a strong 2017 achieving net incremental energy savings of 7.0 GWh...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program saw increased participation and energy savings in 2017, driven in part by the adoption of the EnerGuide Rating System 13 (ERS) and an increase in heat pump installations. ENS suspended the release of Energy Action Plans (EAPs) in Q4 2017 following the implementation of the new EnerGuide system.
periods. Following the release of the new EnerGuide Rating System and 25 the associated Homeowner Upgrade Reports, ENS suspended the release of the HEA 26 EAPs in Q4 of 2017. 13 EnerGuide Rating System, version 15. 14 The EnerGuide Rating...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) suspended the release of Home Energy Assessment (HEA) EAPs in Q4 2017 following the introduction of the new EnerGuide Rating System. ENS also launched an EnerGuide Real Estate Listing pilot in partnership with federal and provincial governments, the Nova Scotia Realtors Association, and ViewPoint Realty Services.
an a review of its incentive structure and rebate guide in 2017, with the 8 objective of increasing convenience and accessibility for potential participants. 9 10 Green Heat 11 12 Green Heat achieved net incremental energy savings of 3.0 G...
AI summary Green Heat achieved significant energy savings and increased participation in 2017, largely due to the introduction of high-efficiency ductless mini-split heat pumps and changes to its rebate structure. The program transitioned to a post-purchase, mail-in rebate process and adjusted incentives to promote high-efficiency heat pumps.
17 energy-efficient products in over 13,000 residences across Nova Scotia, of which, 18 approximately half self-identified as, or were estimated to be, low-income households. 19 20 EPI saw lower-than-anticipated net incremental energy savi...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program installed energy-efficient products in over 13,000 residences in Nova Scotia, with about half being low-income households. However, EPI experienced lower-than-expected energy savings in 2017 due to fewer participants than anticipated. The program was formed in 2017 by merging the Residential Direct Install (RDI) and Rental Properties and Condos (RPC) components of the Existing Residential program.
y 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 22 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 • lower-than-anticipated energy savings per participant. 18 2 3 Lower-than-expected participation in EPI also affected the annual exp...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report highlights lower-than-anticipated energy savings and participation in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, affecting expenditures. The New Residential program achieved energy and peak demand savings, though slightly below planned targets.
of 2017 net incremental energy and net peak demand savings, 22 expenditures, and participation by rate class for the New Residential program is 23 presented in Table 6, below. 18 More products were installed per EPI participant in 2017 due...
AI summary The text discusses the 2017 New Residential program's energy and peak demand savings, expenditures, and participation by rate class, as presented in Table 6. It also mentions factors influencing product installations and lighting socket replacements, such as dwelling size and the replacement of incandescent bulbs with other technologies.
2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 and Savings Verification Consultant recommendations, ENS updated its NHC incentives 2 in Q2 of 2017. 19 3 4 In 2016, ENS launched a Passive House pilot to encourage more Passive House 5 construction, as we...
AI summary In 2017, ENS updated its NHC incentives and launched a Passive House pilot to encourage energy-efficient construction. The BNI sector achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, with programs including Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation. ENS also continued its On-site Energy Manager initiative to support energy-efficiency projects in large organizations.
initiative in 2017. Under this initiative, ENS places an energy manager within a large 27 organization to identify new energy-efficiency projects and to support the organization 19 New Home Construction Program, 2015 DSM Evaluation: Effici...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) implemented an initiative in 2017 placing energy managers in large organizations to identify and support energy-efficiency projects. OEM services are partially funded through project incentives, and savings from these services are claimed within three BNI programs. The BNI sector achieved disproportionately high net peak demand savings in 2017 compared to energy savings, due to changes in program measure distribution.
ograms by offering technical assistance, financial incentives, and project 24 financing to participants to aid in the reduction of their electricity consumption and 25 demand. 26 27 A breakdown of 2017 net incremental energy and net peak d...
AI summary The document outlines the 2017 results of the Custom Incentives program under Efficiency Nova Scotia, including energy savings, peak demand reductions, expenditures, and the number of projects completed, categorized by rate class. The data is presented in Table 8.
The Custom component of the Custom Incentives program generated 21.0 GWh of net 4 incremental energy savings and 3.6 MW of net peak demand savings in 2017 from 78 5 projects. 6 7 The Custom component comprises three separate services: Retr...
AI summary The Custom Incentives program generated significant energy and peak demand savings in 2017, with the Retrofit service contributing the majority of savings. The program includes Retrofit, Building Optimization, and New Construction services, with a 55% increase in project initiations compared to 2016. HVAC, compressed air, and refrigeration were the main contributors to savings in the Retrofit service.
ay 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 30 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 The New Construction service also achieved savings from seven projects in 2017. This 2 service encourages participants to make decis...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's New Construction service achieved electricity savings through seven projects in 2017 by encouraging informed decisions and offering technical support and incentives. The Custom component initiated five pilots, including compressed air leak repairs, refrigeration optimization audits, and building envelope air leakage repairs.
rticipants had not 2 advanced as far in their EMIS implementation as forecasted at the time of the 2017 mid- 3 course adjustment. 4 5 Strategic Energy Management 6 7 SEM focuses on operational and procedural changes that companies can make...
AI summary The document discusses the implementation of the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program, noting delays in EMIS implementation and revised start dates affecting savings claims. It also highlights the performance of the Direct Installation program (SBES) in 2017, showing energy and peak demand savings compared to planned targets.
Residential Programs Efficient Product Rebates 0.6 4.9 0.1 0.3 Instant Savings1 0.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 4,725 Units rebated Appliance Retirement1,2 0.3 2.4 0.0 0.3 466 Units rebated Existing Residential 8.5 74.4 1.1 1.9 Home Energy Assessments3 -...
AI summary The text outlines residential and BNI programs, including efficient product rebates, instant savings, appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and green heating systems. It provides data on participation and units rebated, highlighting the scale and scope of these initiatives.
38,101 2 Includes estimates of low-income participation in program components where income is not disclosed. Estimates reported in previous quarters may have been updated and are 3 reflected in the YTD totals. Energy and demand savings are...
AI summary The text provides details on low-income participation estimates in energy efficiency programs, noting assumptions made when income is not disclosed. It highlights that participation rates are based on assumptions and may be revised in the future as methodologies improve. Savings and expenditures are calculated with considerations for free-ridership and spillover effects.
overall. 14 7 Participation numbers are totals that include varying proportions of low-income and non low-income tenants. Expenditure and savings are estimated for the low-income portion. 15 8 The exact installation location of products re...
AI summary Enabling Strategies in 2017 focused on increasing awareness of DSM programs, evolving services through innovation, and driving market transformation. Categories included Education and Outreach, Development and Research, and Other Enabling Strategies.
siness Voice magazine, the Inverness Oran newspaper, and 3 Seafood Alliance magazine, highlighting ENS’s energy partnerships with Nova Scotia 4 businesses and municipalities. 5 6 ENS continued its Green Schools program in 2017, with over 2...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) promoted energy efficiency through partnerships with businesses and municipalities, and continued its Green Schools program, reaching over half of Nova Scotia's schools. ENS participated in various community events, educational conferences, and initiatives in 2017 to promote energy efficiency and sustainability.
idgewater from October 27-28, 2017; and 26 • the Girl Guides Canada Provincial Guiders Conference on November 25, 2017, 27 where there were over 300 attendees. 28 29 Partnerships between ENS and Nova Scotia’s leading post-secondary institu...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) continued its partnerships with post-secondary institutions in 2017, sponsoring energy efficiency and renewable energy courses at Saint Mary’s University and Dalhousie University. ENS also partnered with the Nova Scotia Community College to create a scholarship award and hosted the Bright Business Conference, which attracted over 250 participants and recognized businesses for energy efficiency initiatives.
ed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 39 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 • releasing the 2016 EfficiencyOne Annual Report (distinct from the ENS Annual 2 Progress Report); 3 • releasing ENS’s The Swit...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) released various reports and newsletters in 2017, including the 2016 EfficiencyOne Annual Report and The Switch e-newsletters. ENS also recognized achievements in energy efficiency and received awards for its contributions. Development and research initiatives included the Incentive Setting Methodology, a Small Business Energy Study, and the electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM).
understand 9 this market segment and the barriers faced by small businesses looking to participate 10 in DSM programs. 11 12 Electronic Technical Reference Manual 13 14 In 2017, ENS completed its electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM...
AI summary The document discusses the development of an electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM) by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) in 2017. The eTRM is a web-based tool that integrates with ENS’s DDSM data tracking system, providing a centralized repository for energy-efficiency measure methodologies and improving transparency and accuracy in savings calculations.
29, 2018 Page 37 of 68 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 41 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 eTRM available for the Evaluation Consultant and Savings Verification Consultant to 2 review and...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) integrated the eTRM into daily operations as the new DDSM data tracking system is developed. ENS also conducted research on quality assurance, participant satisfaction, and the economic impact of the energy-efficiency industry in Nova Scotia in 2017.
sate for this barrier and to increase participation in 9 DSM programs. In ENS’s experience, financing programs complement, but do not 10 replace, traditional rebate programs. 11 12 Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs enable part...
AI summary The text discusses how financing programs, such as PACE, complement traditional rebate programs in increasing participation in DSM initiatives. It also outlines capacity-building strategies in 2017, including training, marketing support, and promoting new building standards like Passive House.
y 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 43 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 Activities related to the Supplier Performance Management program, in order to 2 improve cost and scheduling efficiencies as well as...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) implemented activities to improve the Supplier Performance Management program, including training, workload distribution, and collaboration to enhance participant experience and reduce costs. ENS also continued to support the energy-efficiency industry through its Energy Trade Network (ETN), aiming to drive energy savings, build industry capacity, and deliver value to members.
crease participation in ENS services; 16 • build industry capacity for energy-efficiency work in Nova Scotia; and 17 • deliver demonstrable value to its members. 18 19 In 2017, the ETN continued to build on momentum gained through efforts...
AI summary In 2017, the Energy Trade Network (ETN) continued to build on prior efforts, including the release of training modules, an enhanced online directory, advertising campaigns, information sessions on Green Heat program changes, online guides for participants, and the distribution of its bi-monthly newsletter.
nthly 2 newsletter that highlights updates on programs, pilots, procurement 3 opportunities, helpful tips, training, events, and more. 4 5 ENS continued to strengthen its relationship with industry stakeholders throughout 2017 6 by hosting...
AI summary In 2017, ENS strengthened its relationship with industry stakeholders through various training and events, including conferences and courses on energy efficiency. ENS also promoted the Passive House concept and new home building standards, and developed a video highlighting energy-efficient housing projects.
ments 26 27 ENS seeks to drive market transformation by working with governments to promote the 28 adoption of energy-efficiency measures by implementing codes and standards. 29 30 In 2017, ENS continued to support the development of natio...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) works with governments to promote energy-efficiency measures through codes and standards. In 2017, ENS supported national energy-efficiency standards by participating in committees, reviewing initiatives, and assisting with codes and standards-related activities.
uding 25 media and in-store advertising for the spring and fall Instant Savings campaigns, digital 26 marketing, and EPR highlights in ENS’s The Switch Residential newsletter. 27 28 Appliance Retirement 29 30 In 2018, ENS will focus on gen...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) plans to continue and expand its Appliance Retirement program in 2018, including working with the Halifax Regional School Board to retire inefficient appliances and launching an online booking portal. The Existing Residential program includes components like Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation.
• Home Energy Assessment; 16 • Green Heat; 17 • Efficient Product Installation; and 18 • First Nations Home Energy Efficiency pilot. 19 20 These components provide services that are focused on whole-home (including building 21 envelope) re...
AI summary The document outlines key energy efficiency programs, including Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, Efficient Product Installation, and a First Nations Home Energy Efficiency pilot. These programs focus on whole-home retrofits, low-cost energy-efficient technologies, and rebates. The Home Energy Assessment program is reviewed for improved incentive structures and user-friendliness in 2018.
ing pilot in 2018, which gives homeowners the option to have EnerGuide information 6 included with their home listing on the ViewPoint.ca real estate website. 7 8 Green Heat 9 10 Green Heat will continue its focus on ductless MSHPs in 2018...
AI summary The document outlines Green Heat's 2018 initiatives, focusing on ductless MSHPs, hybrid heat-pump water heaters, and wood and pellet stoves. It also mentions the pilot of thermostatic shower valves under Efficient Product Installation (EPI) to reduce hot water and energy waste.
The DSM-funded 12 portion of the pilot will seek to deliver significant electrical energy savings to on-reserve, 13 Band-owned homes, where the household is income-qualified. 14 15 Currently, Band-owned homes are not eligible for the HomeW...
AI summary The DSM-funded pilot aims to provide energy assessments and efficiency upgrades to Band-owned homes in First Nations communities, focusing on electrical heating systems and building envelope improvements. The pilot will be available in all 13 First Nations communities, with priority given to homes that will achieve the most significant energy savings. The initiative also includes appliance replacements in non-electrically heated homes. ENS will continue collaboration with the NHC Service Provider and the Passive House pilot in 2018.
May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 54 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 NHC will continue building relationships and further engaging with builders and 2 contractors across the province to increase aware...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) outlines its 2018 plans to expand energy efficiency programs, focusing on engagement with builders, contractors, and the Business, Non-Profit, and Institutional (BNI) sector. Key initiatives include marketing campaigns, trade-show participation, and the continuation of programs like Efficient Product Rebates and Custom Incentives.
trial; 24 • Agriculture; 25 • Small Businesses; 26 • Commercial Buildings; 27 • Hospitality; and 28 • Municipalities. DATE FILED: March 29, 2018 Page 51 of 68 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 55 of 92 Efficiency Nova S...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) outlines marketing strategies for 2018, targeting sectors such as agriculture, small businesses, and commercial buildings. Efforts include integrated marketing campaigns, website improvements, success story sharing, and industry partnerships. ENS also plans to refine and expand rebates, focusing on lighting and heating, and will host education events for small businesses.
SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 57 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 Strategic Energy Management 2 3 In 2018, ENS is introducing a flexible approach for SEM participants, in contrast to the 4 cohort model previous...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is introducing a more flexible approach to the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program in 2018, allowing individual enrollment and one-on-one support. The Direct Installation program, marketed as Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES), will continue to help small businesses access energy-efficient upgrades and improve the participant experience.
ts website as 19 well as implement additional process improvements to enhance and simplify the 20 participant experience and reduce the cycle time for processing applications. 21 22 Throughout the year, SBES will continue to expand support...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) plans to enhance the participant experience and reduce application processing time. It will expand support for non-lighting measures and emerging technologies, and prioritize outreach efforts, including participation in trade shows and events, support for the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN), and education sessions for small businesses.
pport existing 2 participants in the implementation of energy-efficient upgrades recommended in the 3 primary audit portion of the pilot. 4 5 3.3 Enabling Strategies 6 7 Enabling Strategies will remain an important priority at ENS in 2018...
AI summary The document outlines Enabling Strategies for 2018 at ENS, focusing on Education and Outreach to raise awareness of energy efficiency. Activities include social media engagement, newsletters, advertising, and integrating energy efficiency into education programs.
ng awareness of, and 30 building energy efficiency into, the P-12 curriculum; 31 • working with post-secondary institutions to deliver energy efficiency courses; DATE FILED: March 29, 2018 Page 55 of 68 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 A...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) outlines its 2018 plans for education, development and research, and enabling strategies, including PACE financing, capacity building, government collaboration, and regulatory affairs.
12 Throughout 2018, ENS will continue to support and grow the energy-efficiency industry 13 in Nova Scotia and build on the successes of the ETN by: 14 • continuing the successful theme of ‘The Good Things Efficiency Brings’ at ENS’s 15 an...
AI summary In 2018, ENS plans to support the energy-efficiency industry in Nova Scotia by continuing to grow the ETN, offering tailored events, discounts on training, and providing communication and training resources to ETN members.
mbers to provide information on how they 30 can work with ENS Business Development Managers to increase uptake in the 31 (Commercial) New Construction service; DATE FILED: March 29, 2018 Page 57 of 68 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Att...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is working to increase the uptake of energy efficiency services, particularly in commercial new construction, and plans to support the development of national energy-efficiency standards in areas such as retrofit commissioning and thermal bridging methodology. ENS also plans to collaborate with its Evaluation Consultant on codes and standards evaluation.
• quantification of non-energy benefits for cost-effectiveness testing purposes; 3 and 4 • addressing evaluation and verification recommendations. 5 6 In the first quarter of 2018, ENS consulted with DSM Advisory Group stakeholders to 7 de...
AI summary The document discusses Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) work on the 2019 DSM Plan, in line with the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act. It also mentions planned and actual DSM expenditures for 2015-2017 and highlights ENS's collaboration with the DSM Advisory Group and Evaluation and Verification Consultants.
r would conduct a detailed review of capital expenditures that could 17 potentially be avoided through locational DSM and convey the results to ENS; 18 and 33 Supra note 1. 34 Ibid at Schedule B. 35 M06733, NSUARB Decision, The Public Util...
AI summary The text discusses a review of capital expenditures that could be avoided through locational DSM, referencing past regulatory proceedings and agreements involving EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power. It also references past UARB decisions and reports related to demand-side management and efficiency programs.
PROGRESS REPORT 1 pursue the nature and quantification of estimates associated with participant non- 2 energy benefits to improve the TRC test in future Applications.” 41 3 4 Further to this Settlement Agreement, ENS hosted a DSM Advisory...
AI summary This section discusses efforts to quantify non-energy benefits within the TRC test in Nova Scotia. ENS hosted a DSM Advisory Group symposium in 2016 and commissioned a study by VEIC to adapt non-energy benefit values for ENS’s energy-efficiency portfolio. The draft report was reviewed by the DSMAG, and further discussions are planned for 2018.
May 30, 2018 SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 69 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 practices and recommending changes to these practices. This study, conducted by 2 CLEAResult, was completed and a report filed with...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) implemented a new incentive setting methodology in 2017 based on a study by CLEAResult. The methodology was filed with the UARB and includes periodic reviews of existing incentives, using a Consolidated Calculator. A two-year market research plan was also developed to inform future research.
Result’s 17 recommendations. The incentive setting and review process uses a Consolidated 18 Calculator, which was developed by ENS further to recommendations from CLEAResult. 19 20 ENS also performed a financial simulation for all measure...
AI summary The document outlines Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) implementation of incentive setting and review processes, including the use of a Consolidated Calculator and a financial simulation conducted in 2017 based on CLEAResult recommendations. An evaluation of ENS's progress was also conducted and filed as part of the 2017 Evaluation Report.
Expected Evaluation/ Year Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Period of Verification Completion 2013 Evaluation Consider adjusting the hours of operation used in the unitary savings MURB-R5 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendati...
AI summary The 2013 evaluation recommends adjusting the hours of operation for lighting products in unitary savings calculations. ENS agrees, but notes that the Hydro-Québec study's CFL data should be used for 2013 due to similar market characteristics between Quebec and Nova Scotia, despite the study only covering CFLs.
2014 Evaluation Perform thorough M&V and document it in a complete report for every large Custom-R1 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation. Standardized M&V processes and Complete project for which thorough M&V work is justified and...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of thorough Measurement and Verification (M&V) processes for energy efficiency projects, emphasizing the need for complete reports for large projects and recommending standardized practices. ENS agrees with the recommendation and acknowledges that improvements may still be needed.
esults should include the identification of the CEAs who conducted each assessment to provide more support or training to CEAs with less experience. 2015 Evaluation Continue working towards the standardization of measurement and Custom-R2...
AI summary The document discusses the need for standardizing measurement and verification (M&V) procedures for Custom Retrofit under ENS. It highlights the importance of involving CEAs in the process and improving documentation to ensure consistency and completeness of M&V activities. ENS has standardized its M&V policy and plans to launch an updated PDA in 2018.
2015 Evaluation Improve the internal review procedure for savings calculations of both BER BER-R1 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation. ENS modified the participant Complete Mail-in and Instant Rebates. In 2015, the Evaluator appli...
AI summary In 2015, the Evaluator identified significant data entry errors and inconsistencies in the BER Mail-in and Instant Rebates programs, leading to large adjustments in savings calculations. ENS implemented new procedures to address these issues, including updated baseline wattages and ballast factors. Additional quality control steps are recommended to ensure accurate savings calculations.
savings. The Evaluator also noticed, in a few cases, discrepancies between the evaluation. ENS also completed additional training of staff to ensure the calculation algorithms, the variable descriptions and the savings calculated for savin...
AI summary The Evaluator identified discrepancies in calculation algorithms and variable descriptions for savings calculations in the BER Instant Rebates program. ENS addressed these issues by training staff and updating evaluation categories to align with those used in the 2015 evaluation.
ides real value and authentic service relationships should be told in everyday language and in a way that is inherently interesting and understandable. 2013 Verification Hours of Use Study. The evaluator and ENSC should conduct a Nova Scot...
AI summary The text discusses the completion of a Residential Lighting Metering Study by the Evaluator in 2017, which was included as an appendix to the 2017 Existing Residential evaluation report. ENS agrees with the recommendation for conducting a Nova Scotia hours of use study.
Table 2 Attachment 1, Page 7 of 20 Update on Implementation of 2013-2015 Verification Recommendations Expected Evaluation/ Year Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Period of Verification Completion 2014 Verification Develop evaluati...
AI summary The document discusses the development of evaluation guidelines as part of the 2013-2015 Verification Recommendations. ENS agrees with the recommendation and is in the process of developing guidelines based on the New York evaluation guidelines and appendices to set evaluation standards for future evaluations. The expected completion period is 2018.
2014 Verification Calibration for Custom New Construction. Structure project monitoring to gather more data Savings Deferred ENS appreciates this recommendation. Peak demand To be to conduct a conclusive calibration billing analysis in 201...
AI summary ENS appreciates a recommendation to conduct a calibration billing analysis in 2015 to develop a diversity factor for peak demand savings. ENS plans to use Portfolio Manager as a tool for storing utility bill data, though its use is not currently mandatory for NC participants.
reliable, and use of a single savings value for all Tier 2 smart power controllers products is appropriate. Therefore, ENS will continue to use a single savings value for smart power controllers.
AI summary The document states that using a single savings value for all Tier 2 smart power controllers is appropriate, and ENS will continue this practice.
use a single savings value for smart power controllers.
AI summary The text mentions the use of a single savings value for smart power controllers, indicating a focus on efficiency and standardization in energy management systems.
2015 Verification Maintain and enhance the EMIS savings by adopting SEM program elements with the EMIS SV-20 (EMIS) In Progress ENS agrees with this recommendation. The existing 2018 technology. For the EMIS program, multi-year evaluated s...
AI summary The text discusses the need to maintain and enhance EMIS savings by integrating SEM program elements. ENS agrees with the recommendation and highlights the importance of multi-year evaluated savings, ongoing support, and commitment to SEM at the plant and company level.
SEM, ENS is currently working with a new service provider and will evaluate each participants' requirements for continued support beyond year one. ENS has engaged with past SEM participants, resulting in further interest in the EMIS progra...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is collaborating with a new service provider to evaluate continued support for participants in the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program beyond the first year. ENS has also engaged with past SEM participants, generating further interest in the Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS) program.
iness Energy SBES, and Custom program components. Rebates, Custom, and Small Business Energy Solutions. It is recommended that this new methodology be applied in 2017.
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of a new methodology for energy efficiency programs, including rebates, custom solutions, and small business energy solutions, with a recommendation to apply it in 2017.
Continue monitoring key market indicators to adapt program component offerings when needed. Increasing Instant-R1 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation and completed it in 2017. Interviews Complete adoption of LEDs by consumers and...
AI summary The document discusses the need to continue monitoring market indicators for LED adoption, noting reduced barriers and increased sales. ENS agrees with the recommendation and completed it in 2017, while also piloting non-lighting products in the Instant Savings program.
t transformation is achieved. Based on the state of the market, different exit strategies that can lead to continuous energy savings even after a program or incentive has ended could be investigated. Closely monitor the evolution of the re...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of new Canadian energy efficiency regulations on refrigerator and clothes washer markets in Nova Scotia, noting that many products already meet new standards. ENS has adopted these standards as a baseline and will monitor the market to assess the cost-effectiveness of appliance rebates.
ebates in refrigerators and clothes washers and, if so, select the right energy performance criteria to ensure a certain level of 2018. savings and impact in the market. Assign staff to answer EA questions about HEA. To clear some of the c...
AI summary The text discusses the need to improve clarity and communication regarding Home Energy Assessments (HEA) following changes since 2015. Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has assigned staff to address questions from Energy Advisors (EAs) and is exploring ways to provide better training and information transmission to EAs and participants.
cipants who mentioned unclear HEA investigating how best to support additional training for EAs. requirements as a source of dissatisfaction with HEA in 2016. Attachment 1, Table 3, 2016 Evaluation Recommendations Efficiency Nova Scotia -...
AI summary The text references an evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program from 2016, highlighting dissatisfaction with HEA requirements and the need for additional training for Energy Advisors (EAs). It also cites an Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report and a filing from May 30, 2018.
ovide more accuracy and consistency with the savings claimed among the different residential program components. Only a small number of DHW measures (two) were installed by HEA participants in 2016, but since this number is expected to inc...
AI summary The text discusses the need for improved accuracy in residential energy savings tracking within the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program. It highlights the importance of integrating unitary savings values for DHW measures and ongoing follow-ups with Energy Assessors (EAs) to ensure quality in simulation files. ENS agrees with these recommendations and continues to conduct project reviews and follow-ups.
Monitor market progress to adapt the program component offer to the evolving market. According to the GH-R1 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation has implemented changes to the Complete retailers of biomass measures and heat pumps i...
AI summary The document discusses the need to monitor market progress and adapt the Green Heat program based on changes in consumer behavior, product availability, and market transformation. ENS has updated eligibility criteria for heat pumps, and the Evaluator recommends surveys and consultations to better understand market evolution and ensure program effectiveness.
Increase program component advertising to households and collaborate with retailers. Evaluation results showed GH-R2 In Progress ENS agrees with this recommendation. In 2017, it increased its marketing 2018 fairly high free-ridership level...
AI summary The evaluation of the Green Heat program highlights high free-ridership levels for rebated products, particularly heat pumps. It recommends increasing advertising to households and collaborating with retailers to improve outreach and promote higher efficiency models. ENS has taken steps to enhance marketing efforts, including digital ads and in-store materials.
orly understanding Green Heat. The Evaluator suggests increasing program component knowledge among retailers by providing them with an impetus to more actively promote higher efficiency models, and offering point of sale promotional materi...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends increasing retailer knowledge of Green Heat programs and considering real baseline conditions in savings calculations. ENS agrees and has implemented the recommendation, noting that many participants already have efficient or secondary heating systems, which reduces potential energy savings.
h a larger sample of participants who will provide sufficient billing data; and (2) to take into consideration any major changes that may occur in 2017 as the Green Heat management team makes adjustments to this relatively new measure. Con...
AI summary The evaluation of central heating systems' runtime hours is being improved through new energy modeling and billing analysis. ENS agrees with the recommendation to continue researching more accurate sources. The analysis shows that MSHPs do not operate as many hours as originally estimated, likely due to the presence of other heating systems.
t is recommended that additional visits should be conducted in early 2017 so as to determine with confidence whether or not the installation rates have decreased in comparison with the previous years. Start measuring spillover in 2017. Spi...
AI summary The document recommends measuring spillover effects in the RP&C program starting in 2017 due to observed changes in product upgrades and installations, such as LED lamps and mini-split heat pumps, which may be influenced by market evolution and participant behavior.
Table 3 Attachment 1, Page 12 of 20 Update on Implementation of 2016 Evaluation Recommendations Expected Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Period of Completion Ensure that all required documentation is included in participant file...
AI summary The text discusses the need for complete documentation in participant files for energy efficiency programs, highlighting that EAs performed well but some required documentation was missing for eight of the 10 projects reviewed, such as specification sheets and drawings.
aseline wattages construction applications. in BER new construction projects. Implement complete measurement and verification (M&V) procedures for Mail-in projects generating large BER-R2 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation and ha...
AI summary The document discusses the need for implementing complete measurement and verification (M&V) procedures for large energy-saving projects under the BER Mail-in program. ENS agrees with the recommendation and has established a protocol for projects over one GWh, with plans to develop specific verification processes for large projects and Retrofit projects generating 300,000 kWh or more.
oping such M&V procedures for Retrofit projects. The same procedures should be applied to BER projects generating 300,000 kWh and more to limit the corrections needed to the tracked energy savings. Conduct deeper market analysis to adapt t...
AI summary The document discusses the need for consistent M&V procedures for Retrofit and BER projects, deeper market analysis for BER Instant Rebates, and the impact of market evolution on LED sales and free-ridership. The Evaluator recommends adapting rebate offers and using multiple data sources to assess market transformation.
t pumps (equivalent full load hours). It is recommended that were applied to all applicable 2017 projects. ENS update these values in their tracking system for 2017. Develop tools to help service providers better promote and deliver Buildi...
AI summary The document discusses the need to update tracking system values for heat pumps in 2017 projects and recommends developing marketing materials to improve understanding and participation in the Building Optimization program. ENS agrees with the recommendations and has created an overview for service providers.
evaluation, the Evaluator cannot provide insightful conclusions about the barriers encountered by participants. participation remains low through 2018, ENS and its Evaluator will consider Interviewing a larger group of participants and, ev...
AI summary The evaluation of the New Construction program indicates low participation through 2018, suggesting the need for further research into barriers and participant engagement. ENS has adopted an improved methodology for calculating interactive effects in Retrofit lighting projects starting in 2017 and plans to continue using it in 2018.
ts include peak demand savings calculations as a mandatory element in their submission packages, and (2) that all projects without peak demand savings be validated through an internal review process. Implement a standardized process for va...
AI summary The document discusses the need for improved measurement and verification (M&V) processes for energy efficiency projects, including the inclusion of peak demand savings in M&V plans and the validation of retrofit projects through standardized tools. ENS agrees with these recommendations and has developed tools to address these issues.
rst year of participation. For these impact of 2017 recruitment efforts in 2018. reasons, the Evaluator concludes that EMIS is successful and should be continued and expanded. Continue encouraging EMIS participants to enroll in SEM and str...
AI summary The Evaluator concludes that EMIS is successful and should be continued and expanded. There is a natural connection between EMIS and SEM, and participation in both programs is believed to increase internal energy management capabilities and commitment, leading to deeper and more sustainable savings.
also believed that participation in both EMIS and SEM would increase participant internal energy management capabilities and commitment, thereby helping achieve deeper and more sustainable savings. Attachment 1, Table 3, 2016 Evaluation Re...
AI summary The document suggests that participation in EMIS and SEM can enhance internal energy management capabilities and commitment, leading to deeper and more sustainable energy savings.
port is available in the technical literature. As new research is conducted on the impact evaluation of programs similar to EMIS, this methodology might be refined to capture all incremental savings. Investigate ways of using energy manage...
AI summary The text discusses the potential of energy management information systems (EMIS) to generate greater energy savings and suggests ways to enhance their use. It notes that while some participants did not implement new measures in 2016, ENS has taken steps to increase incremental savings and is working with participants to achieve additional savings.
eline energy regression in 2017. To avoid this in the future, systematic reviews of facility operational and equipment changes should be implemented by ENS to ensure the accuracy of reported savings. Continue to support SEM and identify po...
AI summary The text discusses the need for systematic reviews by ENS to ensure accurate energy savings reporting and highlights the success of the SEM program, with new participants enrolling in 2018 and ongoing recruitment efforts.
e actively recruiting additional participants. 2018 participants. Continue encouraging SEM participants to enroll in EMIS and strengthen integration between the two program SEM-R2 In Progress ENS agrees with this recommendation and worked...
AI summary The text discusses the integration of SEM and EMIS programs to enhance energy management capabilities and achieve deeper energy savings. ENS agrees with the recommendation to encourage SEM participants to enroll in EMIS and anticipates increased participation in 2018.
s also believed that participation in both EMIS and SEM would increase participant internal energy management capabilities and commitment, thereby helping achieve deeper and more sustainable savings. Consider extending the SEM cycle to eng...
AI summary The text suggests extending the SEM cycle to increase participant engagement and achieve deeper energy savings. ENS notes that it lacks sufficient information to analyze the cost-effectiveness of this change and plans to consider it in a future year.
commendation in a future year. future year institutionalize energy management in the culture of participating firms. This has been common in other SEM programs in North America. Attachment 1, Table 3, 2016 Evaluation Recommendations Effici...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of institutionalizing energy management within the culture of participating firms, referencing SEM programs in North America and referencing an evaluation report and attachment from a regulatory proceeding.
savings were the result of the sum of actions taken since the beginning of their participation and not only the additional actions taken since 2015. This was considered standard industry practice. Since ENS established all of its program c...
AI summary The document discusses how energy savings are calculated as incremental savings, considering ongoing support from ENS. It also highlights improvements in the Event Log for SEM impact evaluations, with ENS agreeing to create a more detailed template.
ir trade networks to ensure participants have access to contractors that can manage entire projects; and having the audit report specify a list of contractors who can address each identified measure.
AI summary The text discusses the need for energy efficiency programs to ensure participants have access to contractors who can manage entire projects, and the importance of audit reports specifying a list of contractors for each identified measure.
(5) offering marketing material to contractors to leave behind at businesses and promote ENS programs. Consider working with auditors to make the process of developing cost estimates less burdensome for auditors, SBES-R3 In Progress ENS ag...
AI summary ENS is working to reduce the burden on auditors by gathering price estimates for contractors and distributors, which will be shared with auditors to streamline the cost estimation process for energy efficiency programs.
Improve the application forms and the internal review procedure to ensure the accuracy of savings calculations SBES-R4 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation and developed new participant Complete for DIY projects. The Evaluator foun...
AI summary The document highlights issues with the accuracy of savings calculations in energy efficiency programs, noting that variables used in the algorithm often do not reflect actual conditions. It recommends improving application forms and internal review procedures, as well as ensuring that SBEAs are qualified to conduct audits at industrial facilities.
2017, ENS began offering three tiers of energy audits to small professional manner, one SBEA mentioned that he did not have the technical background needed for evaluating businesses, which are categorized by common measure and building typ...
AI summary In 2017, ENS introduced three tiers of energy audits for small businesses, but noted a lack of technical expertise among some SBEAs for evaluating industrial facilities. Industrial audits require higher qualifications, and ENS may need to assign qualified SBEAs to industrial-sector participants.
that take into account lessons learned during the 2017 evaluation process. carefully watched and rules set up to protect the continuing validity and precision of evaluation results. ENS should increase on-site inspection for quality contro...
AI summary The document discusses the need for ENS to increase on-site inspections for quality control in programs transitioning from ENS control to market reliance, specifically for the Small Business Energy Solutions program. It also highlights the importance of considering long-term savings estimates in evaluations to improve program comparisons and foresight.
Evaluator integrated additional analyses of market indicators for the three program components referenced by the Verification Consultant: Instant Savings, Green Heat and Business Energy Rebates. These analyses are in sections titled "Marke...
AI summary The document discusses the integration of market indicator analyses for three program components—Instant Savings, Green Heat, and Business Energy Rebates—by ENS. It also mentions ENS's agreement to consider the inclusion of non-utility climate mitigation benefits in evaluation reports.
For A-type LEDs, the 2017 Instant Savings Program Evaluation ENS should consider the costs and Instant-SV-R1 Complete ENS appreciates this consideration and discussed it with the Verification Complete benefits of using a market transformat...
AI summary The 2017 Instant Savings Program Evaluation by ENS should consider a market transformation paradigm for A-type LEDs instead of a resource acquisition approach. This includes analyzing market effects, developing an S-curve, and discussing future monitoring of market impacts.
an S curve) in the Residential Efficient Product Rebates (Instant Savings) evaluation report to visually represent their findings on the status of the market. ENS will continue monitoring key market indicators for LEDs moving forward.
AI summary ENS will use an S curve from the Residential Efficient Product Rebates (Instant Savings) evaluation report to visually represent market status findings for LEDs and will continue monitoring key market indicators for LEDs.
nue monitoring key market indicators for LEDs moving forward. In the 2017 evaluation for the Green Heat high efficiency mini-split heat pump measure, ENS should Green Heat-SV-R1 Complete ENS appreciates this consideration and discussed it...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Green Heat high efficiency mini-split heat pump measure in 2017, considering whether it should be structured as a market transformation evaluation rather than a resource acquisition evaluation. ENS integrated additional analyses of market indicators for program components like Instant Savings and Green Heat.
ENS should consider the benefits and costs of structuring the 2017 evaluation for the LED measures Business Energy Complete ENS appreciates this consideration and discussed it with the Verification Complete for Business Energy Rebates as a...
AI summary ENS considered restructuring the 2017 evaluation of LED measures for Business Energy Rebates as a market transformation evaluation instead of a resource acquisition evaluation. This approach included additional market indicator analyses and a technology diffusion illustration in the evaluation report.
in the Verification Consultant's Recommendation EMIS-SV- 2. One way to more clearly communicate the approach is to show the results for each step and each EMIS-SV-3 Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation. To help communicate results...
AI summary The Verification Consultant recommends including detailed tables in the 2017 Custom Incentives (EMIS) evaluation report to clearly communicate the methodology and results of energy savings projects. ENS agrees with this recommendation, and the Evaluator added summary tables of all reviewed EMIS projects to enhance transparency while protecting participant information.
in the report and protection of participant information. Add the following SEM related terms to the Definitions (p. iii); Baseline regression, Projected baseline, SEM-SV-R1 In Progress ENS agrees with this recommendation. SEM did not achie...
AI summary The document discusses issues with the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program, specifically the lack of savings achieved in 2017 and 2018, and the need to update definitions related to baseline regression and projected baselines in the report. Efficiency Nova Scotia agrees with the recommendation to define these terms in the 2018 evaluation report.
consider implementing this recommendation in a future year. future year One way to more clearly communicate the approach is to show the results for each step and each SEM-SV-R3 In Progress ENS agrees with this recommendation. SEM did not a...
AI summary The text discusses the need for clearer communication of energy savings methodology by suggesting a table format to present projected baseline, adjustments, adjusted baseline, actual energy usage, and incremental savings. ENS agrees with the recommendation but notes that SEM did not achieve savings in 2017-2018, leading to no evaluation report being written for 2017. The Evaluator plans to refine the presentation of SEM data in the 2018 report.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 c) While EfficiencyOne continues to diversify its energy savings, it does not set measure- 2 level savings targets. For a breakout of claimed savings by measure please see the 2017 3 Direct Installation DSM Evaluation Re...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is diversifying energy savings but does not set measure-level savings targets. The 2017 Direct Installation DSM Evaluation Report provides a breakdown of claimed savings by measure. Non-residential lighting measures require financial support due to higher costs compared to residential options like A-series LED lamps, and small businesses still need assistance for cost-effective lighting upgrades.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 b) As EfficiencyOne did not have the requested information, it contacted NS Power, 2 which provided the following response: 3 4 Peak demand reduction was addressed in the following items: 5 • Power Shift Atlantic – pilot...
AI summary EfficiencyOne requested information on peak demand reduction initiatives, and NS Power provided details on various programs such as Power Shift Atlantic, Smart Grid/Battery storage, and Critical Peak Pricing. NS Power also mentioned future rate structures and demand response strategies.