E-3E1 (NSPI) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-69
737 passages
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-02: 2 3 For the 2019 DS...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) states that all DSM programs for 2019 and 2020-2022 are funded by NS Power customers and the Province of Nova Scotia for non-electric residential components. Shared costs are allocated using the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's approved methodology. Funding breakdowns and cost allocations are detailed, with references to prior responses for specific figures.
5.8 - - DSM TOTAL 129.1 421.7 120.0 4 Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-02 Page 2 of 3 EfficiencyOne – EfficiencyOne Application for approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity E...
AI summary E1 (EfficiencyOne) responds to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) regarding the approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities (DSM 2020-2022). E1 asserts all program funding comes from customer sources, not non-customer funds, and provides details on program spending, energy savings, and demand reductions.
Energy Demand including Full HST Adjusted Savings Reductions HST for ICTs ($M) ($M) (GWH) (MW) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (Approved) 2020 (Proposed by E1) 2021 (Proposed by E1) 2022 (Proposed by E1) 4 5 Response IR-0...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) submitted a response to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) regarding a supply agreement application for electricity efficiency and conservation activities (DSM 2020-2022). The response includes a table with financial and energy data, including program expenses, HST ITCs, annual energy savings, and demand reductions.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-06: 2 3 (a) Please conf...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) reported achieving 151.4 GWh of first-year energy savings and 25.5 MW of peak demand savings in 2018, with cumulative totals of 419.0 GWh and 75.2 MW over 2016–2018. The response references evaluation reports and annual progress reports for these figures.
Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.9 7.0 12.6 90.9 1.4 1.4 2.5 Existing Residential 6.4 40.2 23.8 378.0 8.6 2.4 6.3 New Residential 2.3 11.4 4.9 147.1 1.4 1.6 4.9 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient P...
AI summary The text presents data on residential and business energy efficiency programs, including Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation, with figures indicating participation and program costs across different categories.
Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.6 6.0 10.6 75.4 1.1 1.3 2.3 Existing Residential 6.3 41.5 23.8 379.3 8.6 2.5 6.6 New Residential 2.4 11.7 4.9 147.3 1.4 1.6 4.9 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient P...
AI summary The document presents data on residential and business energy efficiency programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation initiatives. The data includes metrics such as program participation, costs, and other enabling strategies across various years.
Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 3.2 7.3 13.3 95.1 1.4 1.2 2.3 Existing Residential 8.5 63.4 30.6 484.6 16.1 2.1 7.5 New Residential 2.5 12.0 5.1 155.1 1.5 1.6 4.9 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient...
AI summary The text presents data on residential and business DSM programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation, along with enabling strategies such as education and outreach. The data includes metrics such as program participation and costs.
Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 3.0 6.3 11.7 78.9 1.2 1.1 2.1 Existing Residential 8.6 66.8 30.5 501.3 16.5 2.2 7.8 New Residential 2.6 12.8 5.3 160.5 1.5 1.6 4.9 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient...
AI summary The table outlines participation and program metrics for residential and business energy efficiency programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation initiatives. It provides data across various categories, such as participation numbers and program costs, highlighting the scale and distribution of energy efficiency efforts.
Residential DSM Programs Efficient Product Rebates 2.9 5.6 10.0 68.8 1.0 1.0 1.9 Existing Residential 8.4 66.5 28.8 467.5 16.4 2.2 7.9 New Residential 2.8 13.7 5.5 165.8 1.6 1.7 5.0 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient...
AI summary The text presents a table detailing various residential and business energy efficiency programs, including efficient product rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation, along with their associated metrics. It also includes enabling strategies such as education and outreach, and development and research.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 In response to a request of NS Power, Navigant, through EfficiencyOne, offered to provide to NS 2 Power a “static model” should NS Power wish to review it. 3 4 On February 6, 2019, Navigant provided the following details...
AI summary Navigant, through EfficiencyOne, offered to provide a 'static model' to NS Power for internal review under specific terms and restrictions, including a 30-day license period and limitations on use, modification, and redistribution.
investment. In the context of bill impacts, rate increases, averaged over the life of 26 measures, are 0.8 percent to 1.7 percent, with average bill savings for total customers 1 Black’s Law Dictionary – Online 2nd ed Date Filed: March 29,...
AI summary The document discusses the financial impact of energy efficiency measures, noting that rate increases averaged between 0.8 and 1.7 percent over the life of the measures, with average bill savings for total customers. It references an application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for energy efficiency activities from 2020 to 2022.
onses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Table 2: Effficiency NS NS Power Efficiency NS Year Energy Savings Production Energy Savings at Generator at Generator as % of Production (GWh) (GWh) (%) 2011 141.8 11,917 1.2%...
AI summary The text presents a table and figure related to energy savings by Efficiency NS and NS Power from 2011 to 2017, along with a reference to the 2018 ACEEE Scorecard. It also mentions an application by EfficiencyOne for a supply agreement with NS Power for energy efficiency activities from 2020 to 2022.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-12: 2 3 Reference: Evid...
AI summary The document outlines a request for updated data and market price information related to EfficiencyOne's lighting measures and energy savings tracking from 2011 to 2014 and 2018. EfficiencyOne explains that energy savings by end use were not tracked during 2011-2014, and provides an updated table with unverified 2018 forecast data.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Table 1: Historical percentages of lighting energy savings within each ENS program component 2 (2015-2018) Percent of Savings from Lighting Program Program Component 2015 2016 2017 2018 Business Energy Rebates 84% 84% 86...
AI summary The text presents historical data on lighting energy savings from various program components of EfficiencyOne between 2015 and 2018. It also highlights that the data tracking system prior to 2015 did not allow for detailed tracking, and provides information on EfficiencyOne's 2018 spending on lighting, which was $15.71M and accounted for 51% of its total expenditure (excluding Enabling Strategies).
as $15.71M. 7 (ii) EfficiencyOne’s spending on lighting in 2018 was 51 percent of its total 2018 8 expenditure (excluding Enabling Strategies). 9 10 c) The most common residential lighting solution is LED A-Series lamps. EfficiencyOne is 1...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's spending on lighting in 2018 was 51% of its total expenditure, excluding Enabling Strategies. The most common residential lighting solution is LED A-Series lamps, with average prices provided for 2016–2018. Incentives for this measure were discontinued as of 2019.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 d) The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan introduces the following specific program 2 enhancements to further overcome participation barriers: 3 • New service: 4 o Appliance replacement: full-service appliance replacement packa...
AI summary The 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan introduces several program enhancements to overcome participation barriers, including new services, measures, program components, approaches, and increased financial support for energy efficiency initiatives in Nova Scotia.
o heat pump water heaters; 27 o drain water heat recovery units; and 28 o deep energy retrofits in Home Energy Assessment. 29 • Focused engagement: Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-13 Page 3 of 5 EfficiencyOne – EfficiencyOne Ap...
AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes enhancements to its energy efficiency programs, including the addition of heat pump water heaters, drain water heat recovery units, and deep energy retrofits. The proposal also includes focused engagement with plumbers, plumbing contractors, and residential home heating distributors, building on successful strategies from 2016 to 2019.
• Annual compensation market data sources such as Mercer Compensation Planning 27 Survey (primary); Conference Board of Canada Compensation Planning Outlook 28 (secondary); and Morneau Shepell Human Resources Trends Report (secondary) Date...
AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's compensation practices and procurement policy, referencing market data sources and audit reports filed with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. It also references a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act.
lication pursuant to Subsection 79J(3) of the Public Utilities Act for Approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities. Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Impl...
AI summary The document outlines the filing of an incentive setting methodology related to electricity efficiency and conservation activities under the Public Utilities Act. It includes a report by CLEAResult and an implementation plan by EfficiencyOne, submitted for approval of the 2016-2018 Supply Agreement.
r IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16) TABLE OF CONTENTS
AI summary This document outlines the incentive setting methodology filing by EfficiencyOne, which is part of a regulatory proceeding. It includes a table of contents for the submission, indicating the structure of the filing.
..................................................................12 APPENDIX A: CLEARESULT REPORT ........................................................................13 DATE FILED: June 30, 2016 Page i Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Po...
AI summary The document is an EfficiencyOne incentive setting methodology filing dated March 29, 2019, and includes an appendix with a ClearResults report dated June 30, 2016. The filing is part of a regulatory proceeding and relates to energy efficiency programs.
During the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process, Intervenor 26 discussion emerged on the appropriateness of EfficiencyOne’s incentive levels 27 for Efficiency Nova Scotia electricity efficiency programs. As a consequence, 28 the...
AI summary During the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process, discussions arose regarding the appropriateness of EfficiencyOne’s incentive levels for Efficiency Nova Scotia electricity efficiency programs. The Board’s Order noted that EfficiencyOne was considering recommendations from the Report through internal discussions.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary The document presents an incentive setting methodology filing by EfficiencyOne, which is part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency programs.
ain areas of improvement for EfficiencyOne as presented in their general 7 recommendations. 8 9 CLEAResult’s general recommendations are: 6 10 11 1. It is recommended that EfficiencyOne consider all of the 12 general principles for incorpo...
AI summary CLEAResult recommends that EfficiencyOne adopt a documented incentive setting process and update assumptions for various technologies through customer and technology research, as well as implement a TRM approach to support technology research and set appropriate incentive levels.
The energy savings and cost effectiveness 33 metrics of the measures provide several reference points for 34 setting incentive levels. 5 CLEAResult, EfficiencyOne: Incentive Setting Methodology (June 29, 2016) [unpublished], at page 7. 6 I...
AI summary The text discusses the development of a consolidated calculator to support the incentive-level setting process for energy efficiency programs, referencing EfficiencyOne's methodology and a TRM process. It emphasizes the need for cost-effectiveness screening and integration of review protocols.
019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne incentive setting methodology filing, which is part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency programs.
1 3. EFFICIENCYONE’S IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 EfficiencyOne agrees with CLEAResult’s three recommendations. 3 4 The five general principles CLEAResult suggests for incentive setting are: 5 1. Customer motivations and barriers for participatio...
AI summary EfficiencyOne agrees with CLEAResult’s recommendations and outlines a plan to implement them by December 31, 2016, and June 30, 2017. The plan includes developing an incentive manual, completing market research, and creating a consolidated calculator for incentive setting.
tor for incentive setting. 26 27 All other indicated actions are planned to be completed prior to June 30th, 2017. 8 Ibid, at page 40. DATE FILED: June 30, 2016 Page 6 of 13 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 10 of...
AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's incentive setting methodology filing, referencing actions planned for completion by June 30th, 2017, and citing a source from page 40. The filing was submitted on March 29, 2019, as part of a regulatory proceeding.
1 3.2 Recommendation 2 2 3 3.2.1 Recommendation 2 a) 4 EfficiencyOne is supportive of maintaining up-to-date customer and technology 5 research for its energy efficiency measures, especially those with high levels of 6 annual expenditure....
AI summary EfficiencyOne supports maintaining up-to-date customer and technology research for its energy efficiency measures but acknowledges financial and resource challenges. It will quantify the impacts of research frequencies and report findings in its Q3 Report, while committing to specific research activities in 2016 and planning for 2017-2018.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary This document is an incentive setting methodology filing by EfficiencyOne, submitted as part of the NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1. It outlines the approach for setting incentives, likely related to energy efficiency programs.
alculator 25 prior to the end of the 2016 calendar year. 26 27 3.3 Recommendation 3 28 EfficiencyOne agrees that conducting a financial simulation on existing 29 incentive levels, using CLEAResult’s six financial simulation metrics, is a 9...
AI summary EfficiencyOne agrees to conduct a financial simulation on existing incentive levels using CLEAResult’s six financial simulation metrics as part of a recommendation. The Custom Incentives Program already applies similar tools on a project-by-project basis.
2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16) 1 valuable exercise. This exercise will be useful in determining potential revisions 2 to current incentive levels, based on th...
AI summary EfficiencyOne plans to conduct an initial financial simulation by March 31, 2017, to determine potential revisions to current incentive levels. This process will serve as a baseline for evaluating future incentive levels, provided data remains reliable and valid. A two-year research plan is expected to improve data quality and availability for all technologies in EfficiencyOne’s portfolio by 2017 and 2018.
29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 14 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16) 1 4. ONGOING REPORTING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS 2 EfficiencyOne is committed to keeping the Board and stakeholders inform...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is committed to reporting on the implementation of CLEAResult’s recommendations through quarterly reports, an annual progress report, and an external evaluation and verification process.
ch 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 15 of 206 EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16) 1 5. CONCLUSION 2 EfficiencyOne is satisfied with the recommendations and conclusions presented 3 by CLEAResult. The wor...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is satisfied with the recommendations and conclusions presented by CLEAResult regarding the incentive setting methodology. EfficiencyOne requests the Board to accept these recommendations, along with the Implementation Plan and ongoing reporting mechanisms.
51 Figure 11: Existing Incentive Development Process 52 Figure 12: New Incentive Development Process 53 Figure 13: Excel-Based Tool for Review Protocol 70 6 We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Att...
AI summary The text references figures related to incentive development processes and an Excel-based tool for review protocols, with a focus on energy use and efficiency. It includes a date filed and page reference from a regulatory document.
incentive update protocol (as supported by flow charts, a documentation template and an Excel-based tool) that prescribes both frequency and methodology of updates. The scope of the project focused on financial incentives, though the other...
AI summary The document discusses an incentive update protocol, including its methodology and frequency, and highlights the findings from jurisdictional research comparing ENS's performance to Nova Scotia's Achievable Potential study. It notes that while best practices exist, there is minimal formalized documentation on incentive design.
could be identified that were employed by all jurisdictions in their incentive level setting processes. These principles include: 1. Assess and account for customer motivations and barriers to participation; 2. Determine technology savings...
AI summary The document outlines principles used by jurisdictions in setting incentive levels, including assessing customer motivations, technology savings, financial impacts, and benchmarking. EfficiencyOne's approach to incentive setting in Nova Scotia was reviewed, considering market-specific factors and four programs: Instant Savings, Custom, Business Energy Rebates, and Home Energy Assessment.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 24 of 206 approach is well aligned to other comparable jurisdictions. Activities performed to-date, such as the recent price sensitivity resea...
AI summary CLEAResult identifies gaps in EfficiencyOne's incentive-setting process, including lack of formal documentation, outdated market penetration analysis, and absence of tools for short-term cost-effectiveness calculations. It recommends establishing a consistent and documented process to improve program delivery and refinement.
EfficiencyOne would benefit as a peer leader by having a documented framework to ensure consistency in delivery and continuous refinement of the incentive setting process. 2. Conduct ongoing customer and technology research for identified...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is advised to develop a documented framework for consistency in incentive setting, conduct ongoing research on energy technologies, and ensure that energy savings and cost-effectiveness metrics are used to determine appropriate incentive levels.
the incentive level. EfficiencyOne should follow a TRM approach to support technology research, which will assist in gathering this information. 4. Develop a consolidated calculator/tool for short-term incentive setting and program design...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is advised to use a TRM approach for technology research and to develop a consolidated calculator for short-term incentive setting and program design. CLEAResult has developed tools and templates to assist with this, including an Excel-based tool and financial simulations for specific programs.
405.9 62.5 Final Order $102.15 million 405.9 62.5 Table 1: EfficiencyOne Targets and Budgets Between the Quantum Agreement and the Decision, there was a regulatory hearing to address a number of issues that the UARB had identified in its F...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is required to conduct research on incentive setting practices following guidance from the UARB, which emphasized the need for a more rigorous approach to determine minimum incentive levels that encourage participation with quantitative analysis.
ngly, EfficiencyOne secured the services of CLEAResult to undertake a study to identify incentive setting best practices and recommend changes to EfficiencyOne’s incentive setting process. 2 Decision 2015 NSUARB 204 M06733, Nova Scotia Uti...
AI summary EfficiencyOne engaged CLEAResult to study and recommend improvements to their incentive setting process. The document references a 2015 decision by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board regarding an application by EfficiencyOne for a supply agreement and DSM Resource Plan approval.
in public documents. The best practices were reviewed by the CLEAResult Subject Matter Expert (SME) team, which has significant experience in program design, delivery and evaluation. The result of the jurisdictional scans, contained in App...
AI summary The CLEAResult SME team reviewed best practices for energy efficiency programs, benchmarking ENS’s incentives and performance. Jurisdictional scans identified considerations for incentive setting, which were integrated into recommendations. The study also analyzed Nova Scotia’s energy market, demographics, and regulatory structure to tailor findings to the local context.
. Lastly, Nova Scotia’s energy efficiency policies and the associated regulatory structure were also studied to fully understand how they currently drive incentive setting for ENS’s programs. Review of Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Historical P...
AI summary The document discusses a review of Efficiency Nova Scotia's (ENS) historical program performance and incentive setting methodologies. It outlines an analysis of ENS's programs, including Instant Savings, Custom, Business Energy Rebates, and Home Energy Assessment, and compares them to recommended methodologies informed by jurisdictional best practices.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 29 of 206 Incentive Setting for Energy Efficiency Programs Energy conservation programs feature different types of incentives to attract parti...
AI summary The text discusses the incentive structures used in energy efficiency programs to overcome barriers such as cost, time, and lack of knowledge. It outlines three main types of incentives: financial, convenience, and educational/technical assistance.
are captured under program administration costs. It should be noted that there is a cost associated with providing the convenience incentive, regardless of whether they are accounted for as financial incentives or fall under other program...
AI summary The text discusses the categorization of convenience incentives in energy efficiency programs, including examples like appliance retirement and direct install. It notes that while some convenience-related costs are accounted for as financial incentives, others are considered part of good customer service or program delivery, not incentives.
d technical assistance incentives. These incentives address the lack of knowledge barrier. From posting energy savings tips and a home energy assessment tool on a public website to providing residential and commercial on-site energy assess...
AI summary Educational and technical assistance incentives are crucial for overcoming knowledge barriers in energy efficiency programs. These incentives range from online tools to on-site assessments and are tied to energy savings in some cases. They support market transformation by encouraging participation in energy conservation initiatives.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 30 of 206 behaviour becomes standard practice, and savings can be attributed to Codes and Standards rather than claimed through incentive prog...
AI summary The text discusses market transformation in energy efficiency, defining it as a strategic process to change market behavior by removing barriers and accelerating the adoption of cost-effective energy efficiency as standard practice. It emphasizes that incentives may eventually become unnecessary as energy-efficient behavior becomes the norm.
8/data/papers/10_56.pdf. Adapted from SoCal Edison 14 We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 31 of 206 review is very important to program success. Program and technology maturity i...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of incentive setting in energy efficiency programs, highlighting the need for careful price setting that considers both consumer willingness to pay and production costs. It emphasizes the role of program maturity and the lack of competing incentives in the energy efficiency industry.
Perceived Return on Value Investment Figure 2: Balance of Price Setting Influences The return on investment criteria, in most cases, can be quantified and precisely calculated; however, the perceived value to a consumer can only be measure...
AI summary The text discusses the challenges of quantifying perceived value to consumers in pricing decisions, noting that it is imprecise and varies by individual. It also describes the sigmoid relationship between uptake and incentives in energy efficiency programs, as illustrated in Figure 3.
arch 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 32 of 206 Figure 3: Uptake-Incentive Relationship10 Therefore, to identify perceived value to better understand how to characterize the curve, firms use several strategies for triangulation. 1...
AI summary The text discusses methods for determining perceived customer value and return on investment in energy efficiency programs. It highlights the use of consumer surveys, competitive product research, and historical experience to set incentives. The text emphasizes the importance of rigorous methodologies to avoid systemic issues due to lack of competition.
o price: return on investment and perceived value. Finally, there needs to be a review protocol, which specifies how incentive levels should be reviewed, and if necessary, updated. 10 “The 3 Charts That Will Teach You Everything You Need t...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of return on investment for efficiency programs, emphasizing cost effectiveness and budget impact as key considerations. It also mentions the need for a review protocol to adjust incentive levels when necessary.
IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 33 of 206 RETURN ON INVESTMENT For efficiency programs, return on investment is based on two general considerations: cost effectiveness and budget impact.
AI summary The document discusses return on investment for efficiency programs, focusing on cost effectiveness and budget impact as the two main considerations.
However, incentives are often set at values below the return on investment ceiling, since the considerations involved in determining perceived value triangulate an incentive at a lower value. PERCEIVED VALUE For energy efficiency programs,...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of perceived value in energy efficiency programs and how incentives are often set below the return on investment ceiling. It highlights that perceived value influences customer participation and that determining this value is not a precise science but involves key considerations in incentive-setting.
y efficiency programs However, there are some key considerations and processes that should be used when conducting incentive-setting exercises to determine the value of a potential incentive. Customer Research A critical component of deter...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of customer research in setting incentives for energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the need to gather input from potential customers to understand their price points and barriers. It highlights the principal-agent problem, particularly in rental units, where tenants and landlords have conflicting motivations and responsibilities.
who has the right to upgrade that equipment. 17 We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 34 of 206
AI summary The text discusses the rights associated with upgrading energy equipment, highlighting the importance of energy usage and management. It is part of a broader regulatory proceeding concerning energy efficiency and customer programs.
Incentives and their associated delivery strategies need to be considered carefully in attempting to solve barriers in these situations. Technology Research Technology research is essential when identifying perceived value. The three forec...
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of technology research, including market price, technology penetration, and performance, in shaping incentive strategies. It also highlights the need for collaboration with supply chain and stakeholders to support program design and delivery.
hich can help shape the incentive-setting analysis. For optimal program delivery, the supply chain and stakeholders should also review potential incentive changes and be provided notice to prepare for those changes. Additionally, if the su...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of engaging the supply chain and stakeholders in energy efficiency programs, including considerations for incentive-setting, barriers to participation, and the presence of other market incentives. It also highlights the need for benchmarking incentive rates against similar programs in other jurisdictions when local data is unavailable.
e change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 35 of 206 THEORETICAL LIMITS FOR INCENTIVES Based on the return on investment criteria as well as perceived value considerations, there are thr...
AI summary The text discusses theoretical limits for incentives in energy efficiency programs, including percentage of customer cost, PAC benefits, and budget constraints. These limits serve as reference points during the incentive design process and are independent of one another.
measure is lower, thus supporting the reduction in incentive Additional barriers are identified, which The program delivery structure may require more or increased incentives to leverage cheaper supply chain costs, Supply Chain and res...
AI summary The discussion highlights that additional barriers may require increased incentives to address, such as distributors being unwilling to stock efficient products. It also notes that comparable jurisdictions offer higher incentives, which may indicate changes in market conditions that could justify reduced incentive rates.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 38 of 206 Jurisdictional Research JURISDICTION IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION The selected jurisdictions were as follows: Ontario (IESO); On...
AI summary The document outlines the selection of jurisdictions for energy efficiency research, including Ontario, British Columbia, and several U.S. states, chosen for their size, market structure, and energy efficiency programs. Ontario and British Columbia are highlighted as leading provinces in energy efficiency.
omoting energy efficiency. In the United States, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) 2015 State Efficiency Scorecard had the following results:11 11 The 2015 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, ACEEE, October 2015,...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency efforts in the United States, referencing the ACEEE 2015 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. It notes that most American jurisdictions rank highly, except Maine, which is ranked 14th out of 51. The scorecard evaluates policies, programs, performance, and best practices, with a focus on long-term Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS).
urisdictions selected have long-term Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS), which demonstrate their commitment to energy efficiency as a sustainable form of electricity supply. SIZE, STRUCTURE AND CLIMATE Vermont, Maine and National...
AI summary The text discusses jurisdictions with long-term Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS) and highlights similarities in size, structure, and climate between ENS and other regions like Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts. It also notes differences in electricity systems and policy goals among other jurisdictions, such as BC Hydro and NYSERDA, and identifies general methodologies used for setting incentives in energy efficiency programs.
on participant behaviour proposition. Efficiency Vermont outlines this information in the Draft Product Brief document. BC Hydro conducts primary research such as one-on-one The program evaluation process can consultations for larger custo...
AI summary The text discusses participant behavior in energy efficiency programs, highlighting Efficiency Vermont's use of a Draft Product Brief and BC Hydro's approach of conducting one-on-one consultations for larger customers to understand awareness, barriers, and purchase decisions. It also mentions the importance of program evaluation as a means to perform this research, particularly for new measures.
This research is conducted with the goal PG&E will perform primary and secondary market Program administrators maintain a of understanding the savings opportunity research to determine measure performance and metrics. resource similar to a...
AI summary This research aims to understand the savings opportunity for a specific technology and establish an incentive level range. Jurisdictions identified this as a key element in their incentive practices, involving benchmarking and data collection from comparable areas.
incentives. efficiency technology in market from comparable jurisdictions. Technology Multiple jurisdictions create documents similar to TRMs. For example: Research Efficiency Maine’s Residential and Commercial TRM provides documentation f...
AI summary The text discusses the use of technical reference manuals (TRMs) in multiple jurisdictions, such as Efficiency Maine and the Commission of Con Ed New York, to standardize the calculation of energy and demand savings from efficiency measures. These documents serve as common points of reference for methods, formulas, and assumptions used in energy efficiency programs.
te Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 42 of 206 Research and Engagement Phase General Definition Examples Identified Best Practice Principle The Energy Trust of Oregon will examine other jurisdictions’ incentive rates w...
AI summary The Energy Trust of Oregon examines incentive rates from other jurisdictions, especially those with similar weather conditions, when introducing new measures to its portfolio as part of the research and engagement phase.
ivery strategies to overcome customer barriers
AI summary The text discusses strategies aimed at overcoming customer barriers in the implementation of energy efficiency and other related programs.
Review of Nova Scotia’s Electricity System and Market NOVA SCOTIA’S ELECTRICITY SYSTEM In 2015, Nova Scotia had an annual electricity consumption of 10,400 GWh. The residential sector accounts for 45 percent of consumption, the commercial...
AI summary Nova Scotia's electricity consumption in 2015 was 10,400 GWh, with residential use accounting for 45 percent. The industrial sector's load has declined, contributing to a 70 percent increase in retail electricity rates over the past decade. NS Power owns 95 percent of the electricity infrastructure, and the province is transitioning away from coal, aiming to reduce its share to 20-35 percent by 2020 while increasing renewables.
RESIDENTIAL SECTOR There are more than 390,280 residential households in Nova Scotia.15 The majority of customers are on flat-billing residential electricity purchase agreements. Only 1,000 customers are on residential time-of-use pricing,...
AI summary The residential sector in Nova Scotia has over 390,000 households, with most on flat-rate electricity plans and limited use of time-of-use pricing. Incandescent lamps still dominate lighting, and electric heating systems are common, with significant opportunities for energy efficiency improvements.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 47 of 206 Nova Scotia homes do not have a large space cooling load. The primary cooling system is an electric fan, while only three percent of...
AI summary Nova Scotia homes have limited space cooling loads, primarily relying on electric fans and a small percentage of air conditioners. The province is a winter peaking region, making off-peak cooling savings less impactful for capacity management. A high proportion of electric water heaters presents significant efficiency opportunities for energy conservation programs.
ally, Nova Scotia homes have a high proportion (61 percent) of electric water heaters. This majority also presents efficiency opportunities for larger savings coming from individual projects.
AI summary Nova Scotia homes have a high proportion (61 percent) of electric water heaters, presenting significant efficiency opportunities for larger savings through individual projects.
BUSINESS, NOT-FOR PROFIT AND INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR The commercial sector accounts for businesses, not-for-profits and institutional customers. In Nova Scotia, there are 37,679 accounts that are represented by the Small Business Advocate. Th...
AI summary The document discusses the commercial sector in Nova Scotia, highlighting the number of accounts, rate classes, and eligibility for energy programs. It also outlines weekly operating hours for different customer categories and emphasizes the importance of capturing operating hours for project applications. Indoor lighting energy consumption and fluorescent technology dominance are noted.
uorescent technology dominates indoor lighting in the commercial sector with 94 percent of the installed lamp base. The average lamp wattage is 36W, which indicates that the commercial lighting market is close to market transformation from...
AI summary The commercial sector in Nova Scotia has a high penetration of fluorescent lighting, with limited use of efficient technologies like T8 and tubular LEDs. There is significant potential for lighting controls and energy savings through upgrades and maintenance incentives. Commercial buildings also have high space cooling system penetration, primarily direct expansion, and rely heavily on electric heating systems like baseboard heating.
board heating as the dominant technology. 31 We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 48 of 206 Efficiency Nova Scotia – Policy, Performance and Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) operated from 2010 until 2015 when it was replaced by the ENS franchise, awarded to EfficiencyOne. The document outlines historical energy savings data from ENSC's operations and compares it to other jurisdictions.
Unit Cost of Conservation % of Retail Sales (2014) Rate (2014) Nova Scotia $0.25/kWh 1.3% $0.148/kWh Ontario (IESO) $0.25/kWh 1.3% $0.10-$0.124/kWh British Columbia (B.C Hydro) N/A N/A $0.10-$0.12/kWh California (PG&E) $0.43/kWh 1% $0.1625...
AI summary The text presents a comparison of the unit cost of conservation programs across various regions in Canada and the United States, including Nova Scotia, Ontario, British Columbia, California, New York, Vermont, and Maine, with details on percentages of retail sales and rates in 2014.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 52 of 206 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA’S PROGRAM PORTFOLIO The following table contains a summary of ENS’s current programs, target market and incen...
AI summary This document outlines Efficiency Nova Scotia's current programs, including the Residential Profile and Instant Savings. The Residential Profile provides free online energy assessments, while Instant Savings offers instant discounts on energy-efficient products for residential customers.
ashers. A delivery agent is involved to coordinate retailer efforts, provide the required training and manage compliance issues. Residential customers receive a financial incentive for the old equipment that is being provided to Appliance...
AI summary The text outlines various programs aimed at improving energy efficiency and customer engagement. It describes appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and residential direct installation programs, emphasizing financial incentives, compliance management, and cost-free installations for residential and rental properties.
rtners. These and Rental Properties products include lighting measures, domestic water heating measures (where electric water and Condos heating) and power strips. Residential customers that are electrically heated receive incentives or lo...
AI summary The text outlines residential energy efficiency programs, including incentives and financing for heating technologies, pre-approval processes for rebates, and a new home construction program with energy advisor reviews and rebates based on energy performance evaluations.
essment to evaluate the new energy performance of the home, either through the ENERGY STAR®, EnerGuide, or R2000 rating systems. This incentive offer for commercial and industrial customers is offered through a midstream with Business Ener...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency programs for commercial and industrial customers, including prescriptive incentives, interest-free financing, and eligibility criteria based on energy consumption. Small businesses with annual consumption under 350,000 kWh receive up to 60% cost coverage for qualifying products.
Program Identified Barriers Incentive Strategy 1) Residential customers worry about upfront 1) Residential customers receive incentives at the point of costs. For example, LED penetration, despite sale. The incentives are typically between...
AI summary The document outlines barriers to residential participation in energy efficiency programs, including concerns about upfront costs and the complexity of applying for incentives. It also highlights strategies such as instant discounts and the involvement of delivery agents to improve program participation.
are used to 3) Retailers and their employees show varying promote participation through improving customer degrees of awareness, engagement and awareness and education, while also conducting retailer knowledge of the program. training to i...
AI summary The text highlights that residential customers lack knowledge about energy savings opportunities and are concerned about upfront costs. Retailers and their employees have varying levels of awareness and engagement with programs. Customers receive subsidized energy assessments and personal energy planning services to support them.
idential customers worry about upfront to a personal energy planning service for additional Assessment costs. support.
AI summary Confidential customers are concerned about upfront costs and are seeking a personal energy planning service for additional support.
2) Residential customers receive incentives for installing eligible measures. The incentive is typically 15-25 percent of the project costs. 1) For efficiency projects, commercial and 1) Commercial and industrial customers receive industri...
AI summary Residential customers receive incentives of 15-25% for installing eligible energy efficiency measures. Commercial and industrial customers face challenges with upfront capital and lack of education about energy efficiency projects. The midstream application involves distributors educating contractors, who influence customer awareness and adoption of energy efficiency practices.
3) Through the midstream application, in addition to the contractor education benefit that will pass down to the customers, the distributors are encouraged to stock more efficient products, forcing the market to change in terms of the opti...
AI summary The text discusses the midstream application's impact on encouraging distributors to stock more efficient products and the inclusion of commercial and industrial customers' measures in the Custom Program. It also references a table on barriers and incentive strategies for EfficiencyOne Programs.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 55 of 206 Incentive Setting Methodology Analysis and Recommendations CLEAResult’s analysis and recommendations for incentive level setting met...
AI summary CLEAResult recommends an updated incentive setting methodology for EfficiencyOne, emphasizing general principles, a formal process, and program-specific recommendations for various energy efficiency programs. It highlights the need for up-to-date assumptions based on customer and technology research for residential and commercial energy efficiency technologies.
cial fluorescent technology and commercial Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) technology are kept up to date by conducting customer and technology research. b) Further support technology research by implementing a TRM approach. The energy savi...
AI summary The text discusses the need to keep research on fluorescent and VFD technologies up to date, the implementation of a TRM approach for energy savings and cost-effectiveness metrics, and the development of a consolidated calculator for incentive-level setting. It also outlines the adoption of an incentive-setting methodology for program financial simulation.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 56 of 206 GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR INCENTIVE RATE SETTING Based on CLEAResult’s experience and research on best practices, it is recommended tha...
AI summary The text outlines general principles for incentive rate setting, emphasizing the importance of understanding customer motivations, technology savings, supply chain considerations, financial impacts, and jurisdictional benchmarking. It highlights the use of price sensitivity research and conjoint analysis for high-value incentive expenditures.
Price Sensitivity Research Price sensitivity is usually defined as the affect the price for a product or service has on the consumers’ motivation to purchase it. For incentive setting in energy efficiency and conservation programs, it is i...
AI summary Price sensitivity research explores how price affects consumer purchasing decisions, particularly in energy efficiency and conservation programs. It emphasizes the importance of understanding diverse consumer behavior and uses Van Westendorp’s Price Sensitivity Meter to evaluate price points and their impact on consumer perception.
ed incentive level setting process, and identify if additional efforts are required. In many cases, the existing research efforts can be leveraged for both customer and technology research. TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH Technology research can provi...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of technology research in setting incentive levels for energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the need to understand energy savings, technology penetration, and pricing forecasts for both efficient and base case technologies.
We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 59 of 206 Current Incremental Equipment Cost; Forecast Incremental Equipment Cost (in 1 year); Energy Savings; Expected Energy Savings...
AI summary The text outlines parameters for setting incentive levels in energy efficiency programs, including incremental equipment costs, energy savings, and incentive thresholds. It emphasizes the importance of reviewing these parameters through processes like TRM updates and program evaluations, especially when market penetration exceeds 50 percent.
ure? 2. What is the market penetration? The incentive thresholds discussed in Figure 9 can be used to provide three points of reference for the incentive setting process. Figure 9: Incentive Thresholds used in Financial Impact Analysis 43...
AI summary The text refers to incentive thresholds used in financial impact analysis, specifically Figure 9, which provides reference points for the incentive setting process. The figure is part of a larger document discussing energy efficiency and financial considerations.
GENERAL PORTFOLIO SUMMARY FOR CURRENT AND RECOMMENDED ACTIVITIES General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities Currently, EfficiencyOne uses four different EfficiencyOne should continue these current activities. methods to...
AI summary The document outlines current and recommended activities for EfficiencyOne, focusing on understanding customer motivation and barriers to participation in energy efficiency programs. Current methods include market research, annual surveys, and active program management. Recommended activities include introducing an annual survey on key customer and technology combinations and studying specific technologies with high participation or potential.
General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities EfficiencyOne currently understands EfficiencyOne’s ability to collect cost/price information through program delivery technology savings, price and market and account managemen...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is recognized for its current methods of collecting cost/price information through program delivery and account management. It is recommended that EfficiencyOne continue these activities and introduce a formal measures assumption validation process and summary manual, supported by primary or secondary research and periodic reviews.
General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities EfficiencyOne conducts cost effectiveness EfficiencyOne should continue understanding the macro-level budget impacts testing using the TRC test. The TRC is from incentive level...
AI summary EfficiencyOne conducts cost-effectiveness testing using the TRC test at both measure and program levels. The TRC is used to qualify measures and screen programs for implementation, while considering strategic considerations. The document recommends improving the granularity of data tracking to better manage program risks and adjust spending accordingly.
potential implementation, with the program accordingly. It is understood that some programs may only be able to track data administration costs included. Ex-post cost monthly. Understand Financial effectiveness is not conducted. Impacts Ef...
AI summary The text discusses EfficiencyOne's approach to tracking program financial impacts and implementing a new data management system for measure implementations. It mentions that financial effectiveness is not currently evaluated ex-post and that changes in incentives are forecasted to assess impacts on program budgets and unit costs.
ntive Development Process (for existing incentives that are being reviewed); and 3. New Incentive Development Process (for new incentives that are being considered for implementation). The flow charts do not explicitly list the need to doc...
AI summary The text outlines processes for reviewing and developing new incentives, emphasizing the importance of considering existing market incentives in customer research, technology research, and financial impact analysis. It also describes an initial process for incentive setting exercises.
all five steps should be covered in the analysis. It would be difficult to complete step (5), without completing steps (1)-(3). Figure 12: New Incentive Development Process DOCUMENTATION To complement the processes, CLEAResult is providing...
AI summary The document outlines a five-step process for incentive development, emphasizing the need to complete earlier steps before proceeding to later ones. A template document is provided by CLEAResult to support the review and approval of incentive-setting exercises, and it includes all required documentation steps. The Instant Savings Program is mentioned with recommendations for current and proposed activities.
General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities For Instant Savings, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of technology savings, price and penetration through the following activities: The current activities should be continu...
AI summary The text discusses EfficiencyOne's approach to understanding technology savings, including energy efficiency standards, program evaluation, industry data, and specific studies. It highlights the elimination of CFLs in 2014 as a proactive measure and recommends continuing current activities and implementing general principles to support the Instant Savings program.
program. This provides a recent example of savings are affected by the technology consumption, should also be Technology Savings, proactivity regarding the incentive setting process. updated annually for savings assumptions. Price and Mark...
AI summary The document discusses the annual review and updating of energy savings assumptions for LED technology in residential and commercial sectors, highlighting the need for proactivity in the incentive setting process and the impact of market penetration and price on savings. The Achievable Potential Study from 2014 is referenced as a basis for understanding technology stock.
For Instant Savings, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of the supply chain and service The current activities should be continued. EfficiencyOne, both provider considerations through the following activities: through active program ma...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is advised to continue ongoing program management and evaluation to gain insights into the supply chain and service provider considerations. Annual meetings with retailers and manufacturers are recommended to understand stocking plans and product strategies. It is also suggested that EfficiencyOne explore whether retailers or manufacturers may offer their own incentives for products during upcoming campaigns.
campaigns. When an incentive change is proposed during the program planning process, EfficiencyOne conducts a financial forecast to track the budget impact. Table 16: Instant Savings Program Recommendations 56 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS...
AI summary The Instant Savings Program has a price floor of $0.99 to ensure customer contribution and improve the Net-to-Gross ratio. This approach mirrors incentive caps in commercial programs, though it is not feasible in point-of-purchase retail programs due to logistical constraints.
barriers for the large commercial and industrial sector. If In 2014, EfficiencyOne conducted research into the existing possible, ENS should attempt to aggregate this research, and market barriers and consequentially the required support t...
AI summary The text discusses market barriers for energy efficiency in the large commercial and industrial sector, highlighting the importance of financial and educational incentives. Research by EfficiencyOne in 2014 emphasized the need for financial support to drive participation, while customer surveys indicated that educational incentives and energy modeling expertise were more influential than financial incentives alone.
erved for smaller Custom projects or the residential sector. The small business sector has seen a significant uptake in financing in the past, Through the delivery of the Custom Compressed Air Optimization service, customers frequently ide...
AI summary The document discusses the Custom Compressed Air Optimization service and the Custom Retrofit program, highlighting the introduction of educational incentives to address knowledge gaps and the adjustment of incentive rates based on program experience and customer feedback.
For the Custom Program, EfficiencyOne gains an Continue the current activities of collecting the energy savings understanding of technology savings, price and penetration and cost information through the feasibility studies and/or throug...
AI summary The text discusses the need for EfficiencyOne to continue collecting energy savings and cost information through feasibility studies and program applications, emphasizing the importance of tracking project type data to understand participation trends and implement recommendations from the General Principles section.
sight into general participation trends in participation, which will assist with analyzing market penetration. The semi-annual surveys for commercial fluorescent technology, commercial LED technology and commercial VFD technology can be us...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of understanding technology savings, price, and market penetration through surveys and engagement with the supply chain. It emphasizes the need for analyzing market penetration using semi-annual surveys and supply chain insights to identify large savings opportunities.
Savings, Price and Market Below are two examples for large savings opportunities Penetration provided with Nova Scotia’s market characteristics in mind: 1. Space cooling systems that feature direct expansion technology, either through ince...
AI summary The text outlines two examples of large savings opportunities in Nova Scotia, focusing on space cooling systems with direct expansion technology and electric baseboard heating systems, particularly for controls installation and major renovations, to assist in setting incentive levels.
. This analysis would assist with setting incentive levels for these measures. Finally, the incentive screening thresholds for program budget and cost effectiveness should be established on a per kWh basis for the Custom Program. It may...
AI summary The text discusses setting incentive levels for energy efficiency measures and proposes establishing incentive screening thresholds on a per kWh basis, considering energy savings persistence and avoided costs in Nova Scotia.
y’s perspective. This allows ENS to set an incentive that satisfies all three perspectives. Additionally, any costs for feasibility studies are included in the final incentive payment. Current program data indicates that incentives are on...
AI summary The document discusses the incentive framework for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, highlighting that incentives are typically 20-25% of project costs and contribute to nearly 60% of program expenditure. It emphasizes the need to promote non-lighting measures to increase portfolio diversity and mentions safeguards against collusion and information sharing.
e framework caps protect against this risk. There is also the additional protection of the incentive contract containing a confidentiality clause regarding the amount of the incentive. Finally, since the location of the energy savings are...
AI summary The text discusses protections within an incentive contract, including confidentiality clauses and the use of local avoided costs in incentive negotiations. It also mentions the Business Energy Rebates program and CLEAResult's recommendations for the program.
red for new In 2014, EfficiencyOne conducted research into the existing market barriers and, programs) and program evaluation activities to consequentially, the required support that businesses need to pursue energy efficiency develop a cl...
AI summary EfficiencyOne conducted research in 2014 to identify market barriers for businesses adopting energy efficiency programs and found that financial support is crucial for participation. Ongoing program management includes dedicated roles such as Business Development Managers and Application Coordinators to support distributors and customers.
Continue the current activities of engaging the supply chain and reviewing the project invoices to understand technology savings and pricing. For the Business Energy Rebates program, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of Investigate...
AI summary The text discusses ongoing activities related to the Business Energy Rebates program, including program management, evaluation, and investigations into methods to understand program participant operating hours. It also mentions the implementation of recommendations from a General report.
ed recently. Savings, Price and Market Implement the recommendations in the General Penetration EfficiencyOne currently captures technology savings and cost information through Principles section to support this program. Those discussion...
AI summary EfficiencyOne captures technology savings and cost information through discussions with manufacturers and distributors, as well as project invoices. Program evaluations review and update energy savings assumptions annually. The program should analyze technology penetration using semi-annual surveys for commercial lighting and VFD technologies.
can be used to complement the analysis of market penetration. For the Business Energy Rebates program, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of the EfficiencyOne should continue these current supply chain and service provider consideratio...
AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebates program managed by EfficiencyOne, emphasizing the importance of ongoing program management and evaluation to understand supply chain and service provider considerations.
acts with the supply chain regularly through the Program Manager, Business Development Manager and Application Coordinators. Program Evaluation Through the annual program evaluation process, interviews are conducted with select supply chai...
AI summary The document outlines the process of evaluating the Business Energy Rebates Program through ongoing program management, interviews with supply chain partners, and implementing recommendations from the General Principles section to improve the program and introduce new measures.
uired, they are updated. These inputs affect the cost effectiveness impact. Table 18: Business Energy Rebates Program Recommendations Other Considerations for Business Energy Rebates Program From reviewing program operations, the Business...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates Program is evaluated for cost effectiveness, with a focus on tracking retail pricing and ensuring that incentive levels do not exceed appropriate thresholds. The program is expected to have a high Program Administrator Cost (PAC), but it is anticipated to remain cost-effective if monitoring continues. The Home Energy Assessment program is also discussed, with CLEAResult providing recommendations.
ent 1 Page 82 of 206 HOME ENERGY ASSESSMENT CURRENT AND RECOMMENDED ACTIVITIES For the Home Energy Assessment program, CLEAResult has the following recommendations:
AI summary CLEAResult provides recommendations for the Home Energy Assessment program, focusing on current and recommended activities related to energy efficiency in residential homes.
General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities For the Home Energy Assessment Program, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of customer motivations and barriers It is recommended that market through the following activities:...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment Program is being evaluated through market research, program management, benchmarking, and evaluation. It is recommended that ongoing market research continue, especially in underperforming areas, to better understand customer motivations and barriers.
n the Home Energy Assessment program. It was found that General Principles, the semi-annual some customers were implementing a subset of recommended measures after receiving an audit report, although they surveys for residential HVAC did n...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program found that initial audits provided benefits to homeowners and helped reduce unit costs through spillover savings. Research indicated a 25% incentive was more effective than interest-free financing in encouraging major efficiency upgrades. This informed decisions to further subsidize audit incentives and continue ongoing program management and benchmarking.
For the Home Energy Assessment program, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of technology savings, price and The current activities of engaging the penetration through the following activities: Service Organizations and Natural Resource...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program by EfficiencyOne involves ongoing management and evaluation to capture technology savings. Discussions with service organizations and Natural Resources Canada are ongoing, and recommendations from the General Principles section are to be implemented.
pport this analysis. changes and introduction of new measures. Understand Program Evaluation Additionally, EfficiencyOne should Technology start to understand the technology Annually, through the program evaluation process, the energy sa...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of program evaluation, specifically reviewing energy savings assumptions annually and understanding technology penetration in residential HVAC and building envelope technologies in Nova Scotia.
primary and secondary electric heating systems. As the technology mix changes due to the increased price of electricity and the decreased in costs of other options, the base case assumptions may change. For the Home Energy Assessment progr...
AI summary The text discusses the Home Energy Assessment program managed by EfficiencyOne, emphasizing the importance of understanding supply chain and service provider considerations through ongoing program management and evaluation activities.
Page 84 of 206 General Principle Current Activities Recommended Activities For the Home Energy Assessment program, EfficiencyOne gains an understanding of financial impacts through the The current activities should be following activitie...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program's financial impacts are understood through program evaluation, which involves reviewing and updating energy savings assumptions and net-to-gross ratios to ensure cost-effectiveness. Current activities are recommended to continue, and general principles should be implemented to support the program, including changes to incentive levels and introduction of new measures.
cost effectiveness impact. measures. Understand Financial Impacts Table 19: Home Energy Assessment Program Recommendations
AI summary The text refers to a table discussing the financial impacts and cost-effectiveness of the Home Energy Assessment Program recommendations.
Other Considerations for the Home Energy Assessment Program The Home Energy Assessment program recently introduced an updated incentive structure, which featured an increased incentive for the initial audit, and premiums associated with bu...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment Program introduced updated incentives, including increased initial audit incentives and bundled incentives to encourage larger projects. Early data from CLEAResult shows increased savings and lower unit costs, though it is difficult to isolate the effects of bundling. Bundling is seen as a useful strategy for programs with high customer acquisition costs, and personal energy planning services have enhanced customer understanding and project savings.
ptions and increased the savings from each project. Since delivery of the program is through the participating service organizations, and the project locations are clearly identified, there may be the opportunity to include premium and dis...
AI summary The text discusses opportunities to adjust incentives in energy efficiency programs by aligning them with local avoided costs through premium and discount zones, as the programs are delivered through participating service organizations with clearly identified project locations.
253,461 N/A ENERGY STAR® $5.00 25.5 1.021 25 LED Specialty Lamp ENERGY STAR® $12.00 8,709 $104,508 51.9 0.072 16 LED Recessed Downlight ENERGY STAR® $12.00 7,291 $87,492 151.8 0.175 13 LED Fixture $4.00 6,430 $25,720 18.7 0.019 10 Dimmer S...
AI summary The text presents a list of energy-efficient products along with their costs, quantities, and other associated metrics. It includes items such as LED lamps, motion sensors, and timers, with details like unit prices, total costs, and other numerical data.
), and other data provided by EfficiencyOne, CLEAResult has developed the current estimates for market penetration of the measures. It should be noted that these are estimates only. Measure Estimated Market Penetration ENERGY STAR® LED A L...
AI summary CLEAResult, using data from EfficiencyOne, has estimated the market penetration of various energy efficiency measures. Most measures are expected to have low penetration, while some remain unknown.
Timer Unknown Programmable Thermostat Low (under 40%) Outdoor Clothesline High (over 50%) For the purposes of this analysis, the unknown market penetrations were assumed to be under “Low (under 40%)”. The incentive for outdoor clotheslines...
AI summary The text discusses the market penetration of energy efficiency measures, including programmable thermostats and outdoor clotheslines, and highlights the need to investigate incentives for the latter. It also references the cost to customer incentive level threshold, suggesting a 50% boundary for residential programs based on retail prices.
e should update these numbers internally with the information provided from ongoing program management activities, as the estimated 2016 retail prices for the measures will be more accurate. 2016 Cost to Consumer Cost to Current 2014 Estim...
AI summary The text outlines updated retail prices and incentives for ENERGY STAR® LED lamps and specialty lamps in 2016, reflecting program management activities and estimated cost savings for consumers.
25% Lamp ENERGY STAR® LED $30.00 $7.00 $20.50 $25.00 $20.00 $20.50 Yes 20% Specialty Lamp ENERGY STAR® LED $45.00 $20.20 $44.30 $45.00 $33.00 $44.30 Yes 27% Recessed Downlight Not Not Not ENERGY STAR® LED Included Included Included $45.00...
AI summary The text presents a table listing various energy-efficient products along with their costs, including prices for ENERGY STAR® LED lamps, recessed downlights, dimmer switches, motion sensors, power bars, and timers. The table includes details such as manufacturer's suggested retail price, program administrator cost, total resource cost, and rebate amounts.
Not Not Not Heavy-Duty Timer Included Included Included $20.00 $10.00 $18.00 Yes 50% $30.00 $11.75 $29.99 $30.00 $15.00 $29.99 Yes 50% Programmable Thermostat Not Not Not Outdoor Clothesline Included Included Included $20.00 $15.00 $20.00...
AI summary The text discusses customer cost incentive level thresholds for energy efficiency measures, noting that most current incentives are suitable, except for the dimmer switch and motion sensor with dimmer switch, where the customer cost exceeds the PME by up to two percent.
based on the analysis for the dimmer switch. It should also be noted that the difference between the customer cost and the PME for both of these measures is ≤two percent of the customer cost. From reviewing the current incentive compared t...
AI summary The text discusses incentive levels for various energy efficiency measures, noting that most fall within acceptable ranges, except for ENERGY STAR® A Lamps, Heavy-Duty Timers, and Programmable Thermostats. It also outlines the program budget incentive level threshold and administrative costs.
es Table 25: Cost Effectiveness Incentive Level Threshold for Instant Savings Measures For all of the measures, the cost effectiveness incentive level threshold is not breached. 76 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29,...
AI summary The table compares current incentives for various energy efficiency measures against cost effectiveness thresholds. None of the measures breach the cost effectiveness incentive level threshold, with some measures exceeding the program budget threshold.
all of the measures maintain their current incentive levels, except for programmable thermostats, heavy duty timers and outdoor clotheslines. These measures warrant further analysis. Even though programmable thermostats have an incentive o...
AI summary The analysis suggests maintaining current incentive levels for most measures, except for programmable thermostats, heavy-duty timers, and outdoor clotheslines. These require further review due to low market penetration, high energy savings potential, and high usage in Nova Scotia. Incentives for heavy-duty timers and outdoor clotheslines may be reduced based on comparisons with other provinces and market adoption stages.
level threshold. It should be noted that since an average measure archetype is used, CLEAResult can only comment on average project incentives, and not specific project incentives. Average Average Average Net Average Net Gross Gross Peak E...
AI summary The text discusses parameters for average custom retrofit projects, including average energy savings, demand reductions, and incentive levels. It notes that CLEAResult can only comment on average project incentives rather than specific ones.
roject incentives, EfficiencyOne should take into consideration the energy savings persistence of the project. Comparison of Current Incentive Level to Incentive Level Thresholds Cost to Customer Program Budget Cost Effectiveness Measure I...
AI summary The document discusses the need for EfficiencyOne to track incremental costs to better understand the cost to the customer, noting that these costs differ from project costs and influence equipment replacement decisions. It also states that the Custom Program's incentive levels are appropriate and do not exceed the program budget threshold.
$26.87 (Electric 136.03 GWh $0.20/kWh Base) (Base) (Electric $58.04 Base) 191.43 GWh (Electric (MACE Low $0.30/kWh MACE Low Cost) (MACE Low Cost) 191.43 GWh Cost) Maine (Efficiency $67.03 $0.1567/kW 2014-2016 (MACE High $0.35/kWh Maine) (E...
AI summary The text presents numerical data related to energy costs and consumption, including figures for electricity generation, costs per kWh, and energy usage in gigawatt-hours (GWh). It includes references to Maine's Efficiency Program and mentions MACE Low and MACE High Cost scenarios, along with associated monetary values.
vernment - Ministry of Energy Ontario Energy Board (OEB) Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) 72 Local Distribution Companies (LDCs) The Ministry of Energy sets policy for the electricity sector, and is able to provide the...
AI summary The Ministry of Energy sets electricity policy in Ontario and provides direction to the IESO and OEB through ministerial directives. The IESO operates electricity markets, contracts with generators, coordinates system planning, and oversees conservation efforts. The OEB regulates LDCs and natural gas utilities, reviewing their rate applications. Conservation activities are funded separately and managed by the IESO.
1 Page 103 of 206 In the summer period, the on-peak period for pricing occurs in the afternoon, which also coincides with the system peak, which is driven by space cooling load. ONTARIO - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING Previous Results (Sav...
AI summary The document discusses Ontario’s energy efficiency programs from 2011-2014, focusing on program results such as net savings and expenditures. It highlights various initiatives including appliance retirement, heating and cooling incentives, and small business lighting programs, but notes that expenditure data is not available for most programs.
Financial Impact Cost Effectiveness Impact Program Operations Impact including changes to processes, documents and implementation considerations The business case, once developed, is reviewed by the relevant LDC-IESO working groups,...
AI summary The document discusses the process of developing and reviewing incentive levels for energy efficiency programs, including input from market research, program evaluations, and best practices. The IESO and LDCs are involved in this process, with annual evaluations and specific review cycles for certain programs.
chment 1 Page 107 of 206 participants; and analyzing what future impacts would be on uptake, the budget and cost effectiveness based on current and future participation trends. ONTARIO CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Curr...
AI summary The text discusses Ontario's conservation programs, which cover various sectors and include financial incentives, coaching, assessments, and training initiatives. Ontario has conducted rigorous evaluations of its programs, leading to higher energy efficiency baselines. A new pay-for-performance framework for LDC funding of Conservation Program delivery was recently released.
Program Program Area Program Measures Links Name This program features prescriptive incentives for qualifying measures, purchased from participating retailers. The incentives are provided at point of purchase. Qualifying measures include L...
AI summary The program provides prescriptive incentives for energy-efficient measures such as LEDs and power strips, with incentives based on upfront costs. It also includes free appliance decommissioning, with no additional incentives due to findings from a barriers analysis.
since the program, pilot and barriers analysis determined that biggest barrier to appliance retirement was lack of convenience. Appliance Residential Retirement The program ended in 2015 due to successful removal of the majority of old, pr...
AI summary The appliance retirement program, which ended in 2015, aimed to remove inefficient pre-1994 appliances. The main barrier was lack of convenience. The program offered rebates for high-efficiency heating and cooling equipment through HVAC contractors.
analyzing the Cooling Residential er/Programs/HV up-front cost difference to the consumer between a Incentive AC- standard unit and an efficient unit. Program cost Rebates.aspx effectiveness set a secondary ceiling, with the program equipm...
AI summary The text discusses the up-front cost difference between standard and efficient air conditioning units and how program cost effectiveness sets a secondary ceiling, allowing less cost-effective air conditioners to receive higher incentives.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 108 of 206 This program features both a prescriptive and performance track for incentives. Prescriptive incentives are available for installati...
AI summary The program offers two incentive tracks: prescriptive for energy efficiency lighting and HVAC equipment, and performance-based with $500 or $1,000 per home for achieving specific Energuide ratings.
program were updated to include cost sharing for certain measures that were more expensive on a savings delivered basis. https://saveonen Incentives are based on the lower of the price of ergy.ca/Busines the equipment supply and installati...
AI summary The program has been updated to include cost sharing for more expensive energy-saving measures. Incentives are based on the lower of the equipment cost or a prescribed rate per kWh saved, with the customer covering the remaining cost if the incentive rate is the limiting factor. The program continues to offer free lighting assessments.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 109 of 206 This program provides funding for hiring an Energy Manager for larger commercial or industrial customers. https://saveonen The incen...
AI summary This program offers funding for hiring Energy Managers by larger commercial or industrial customers, with options for guaranteed salary or pay for performance based on realized energy savings. The pay for performance option is set at $40/MWh, and annual savings targets are provided to ensure program cost-effectiveness.
Infrastructure Resource Planning study Natural Gas Conservation Potential study Report on free rider reduction efforts and results across all programs On-bill presentment status report Joint studies and initiatives with electric...
AI summary The text outlines the various studies and reports related to gas utilities in Ontario, including infrastructure resource planning, natural gas conservation potential, and program evaluation. The OEB is leading program evaluation starting in 2016, with the Evaluation Contractor and Evaluation Advisory Committee. The historical performance of DSM programs for natural gas utilities is also detailed, including savings and costs from 2012 to 2014.
ruction program Participants in the RunSmart and Strategic Energy Management programs Figure 22: Union Gas Targets & Performance Metrics 4 98 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page...
AI summary The text includes figures related to Union Gas targets and performance metrics, as well as a section on cost effectiveness testing. It references programs such as RunSmart and Strategic Energy Management, which are part of energy efficiency initiatives.
EXISTING MAIN PROGRAMS – UNION GAS 4 Program Area Program Name Description Incentives Links - Incentives for the audit - Basement Insulation: $450 - $1,000 for insulating 100 percent of the basement (Incentive amount depends on spec) https...
AI summary Union Gas offers a Home Reno Rebate program that includes home energy audits and incentives for insulation, air sealing, and equipment upgrades. Incentive amounts vary based on the specific improvements made.
me-reno - Water Heater: $200 - Window: $40 per window https://www.uni ongas.com/busi ness/save- money-and- Resource energy/space- Acquisition heating- programs https://www.uni Program provides customers rebates for ongas.com/busi a list of...
AI summary The document outlines a program that provides rebates to customers for the installation of efficient technologies and equipment, including examples such as water heaters and windows, with links to additional information.
eck link for list of measures and ness/save- C&I Prescriptive technologies and equipment. incentives money-and- energy/water- heating- programs https://www.uni ongas.com/busi ness/save- money-and- energy/cooking -programs This program is s...
AI summary This text discusses a program that provides incentives for commercial and industrial customers based on overall energy efficiency measures, with contract customers eligible for up to $100,000 in incentives. The program is similar to other incentive-based initiatives and includes links to additional information.
promotions/wea thermostat. - ProgrammableThermostat therization/offer This program combines customers with free natural gas energy efficiency measures installed by Union Gas - No cost for measures and installation Low-Income Aboriginal rep...
AI summary This program offers free natural gas energy efficiency measures, including thermostats and carbon monoxide detectors, along with financial incentives for upgrading furnaces to 95% or higher efficiency, targeting low-income and Aboriginal customers, as well as social and assisted housing providers.
ing furnaces Life customer financial incentives to upgrade to a 95 percent or higher efficiency rating. - Financial incentives to use towards boilers, Program targets customers living in ventilation systems, custom measures and social-hous...
AI summary The program provides financial incentives for customers in multi-family buildings with a high proportion of low-income residents to upgrade to high-efficiency heating systems, including boilers, ventilation systems, and window upgrades, as well as energy-efficient fixtures and education on energy conservation.
https://www.uni This program provides large volume ongas.com/busi customers with technical support and ness/save- Large Volume - Check link for details customer training along with financial money-and- incentives for energy saving projects...
AI summary The program offers technical support, customer training, and financial incentives for energy-saving projects to large volume customers. The Strategic Energy Management initiative focuses on long-term energy savings for large customers, with incentives supporting start-up costs and measured energy efficiency.
e tracked and measured against for measured energy efficiency Management rawer/rec/472262 their baseline performance for continuous improvements over the 5-year participation. improvements. /view/ 104 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR...
AI summary This document provides geographic and load information for BC Hydro, detailing its service area, population, peak demand, consumption by sector, and annual energy savings targets. It outlines the distribution of electricity use across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors in British Columbia.
MARKET STRUCTURE OVERVIEW BC Hydro is a provincial Crown corporation. Their mandate is to generate, distribute, purchase and sell electricity. The sole shareholder of BC Hydro is the Province of British Columbia. BC Hydro reports to the Mi...
AI summary BC Hydro, a provincial Crown corporation, is responsible for generating, distributing, and selling electricity in British Columbia. It operates under the oversight of the Ministry of Energy and Mines and the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC). The Integrated Resource Plan and Clean Energy Act guide BC Hydro's long-term strategy, emphasizing demand side management (DSM) and renewable energy investments. The Ministry monitors DSM progress and may direct BCUC on regulatory matters.
regulatory directions to BCUC as required. The Ministry is also involved with assessing if appropriate incentives are available for utilities to identify and pursue cost-effective programs. PORTFOLIO MATURITY AND HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE Fig...
AI summary The document discusses the assessment of incentives for utilities to pursue cost-effective energy efficiency programs, referencing historical electricity savings from 2003 to 2007 and a forecast of 10,610 GWh of savings in 2020. It also mentions the 2007 Energy Plan's conservation target and the Conservation Potential Review (CPR) conducted in 2006 and 2007.
BC HYDRO PROGRAMS Program Type Programs Details This program intends to inform and educate residential customers about their electricity consumption and motivate customers to reduce that Behaviour Program5 consumption through behavioural c...
AI summary The BC Hydro Programs document outlines several initiatives aimed at reducing residential electricity consumption and promoting energy efficiency. These include a behavior program, a lighting program, and a renovation rebate program, each with specific goals and incentives for participants.
each participant receives about $1,250 in incentives. This program intends to create demand and build homes that are more energy efficient than minimum requirements of the B.C. Building Code. Individual measures vary between sites, but wil...
AI summary The Residential New Home Program offers incentives to build energy-efficient homes rated above 77 on the EGNH scale, with higher ratings earning more incentives. The Low Income Program provides low-cost energy-saving measures and tips to eligible residents, including CFL lamps, faucet aerators, and insulation materials.
offerings are available and delivered through ECAP. They provide qualified low-income residential account holders with a home energy evaluation, the installation of additional energy saving products such as energy-efficient refrigerators a...
AI summary The program provides free energy efficiency services to low-income residential customers, including home energy evaluations and installation of energy-saving appliances. It encourages the purchase of ENERGY STAR compliant products and focuses on major appliances and electronics. The initiative also includes tools and resources for improving energy efficiency in business operations, such as lighting, IT infrastructure, and HVAC systems.
lestone-evaluation-summary-report.pdf (December 2012) 110 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 127 of 206
AI summary The document is a summary report from December 2012, filed by NS Power on March 29, 2019, as part of a regulatory proceeding. The report discusses energy usage and efficiency initiatives.
The objective of this program is to acquire energy savings by reducing the energy intensity of new commercial buildings through more efficient design and construction relative to standard practices, and to transform the new commercial buil...
AI summary This program aims to reduce energy intensity in new commercial buildings through efficient design and construction, and to improve energy management practices. It includes co-funding for energy studies and workshops for senior management.
Energy Management management which produces a detailed report that highlights Assessment areas of opportunities within your organization (Commercial) Working together with BC Hydro to provide you with resources to Program implement recom...
AI summary The text describes an energy management program that includes assessments, benchmarking, and studies to help organizations identify energy efficiency opportunities. It outlines eligibility criteria and available study types, such as site investigations and audits, targeting industrial customers with high energy consumption.
potential of more than 300 megawatt-hours per year Industrial Energy Manager: Customers with more than 10 gigawatt- hours of electricity consumption per year, must hire an energy manager as a full-time employee o 100 percent funding of:...
AI summary The text outlines energy management requirements for large industrial customers in Nova Scotia, including mandatory hiring of energy managers and funding for energy management consulting and assessments. It also mentions the Strategic Energy Management Program and employee energy awareness initiatives.
deliver on Workplace Conservation Awareness 111 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 128 of 206
AI summary The document discusses initiatives related to workplace conservation awareness, highlighting efforts to change energy usage behaviors in the workplace. It is part of a larger regulatory proceeding document filed by NS Power on March 29, 2019.
Community Energy & Emissions Plan (CEEP): Intended for improved energy management and it can be used to foster green economic development in the community Community Energy Manager (CEM): Funding for a dedicated staff resource within lo...
AI summary The text outlines several initiatives under the Sustainable Communities Program, including the Community Energy & Emissions Plan, Community Energy Manager, Local Area Plan, and Project Implementation Pilot. These initiatives aim to improve energy management, reduce emissions, and promote sustainable development. A Business Energy Advisor will also engage with businesses to identify energy-saving opportunities.
and identify energy saving opportunities for both electricity and natural gas. Business Energy Advisors will also introduce applicable incentives for upgrading to energy Advisors efficient technologies to better understand consumption as w...
AI summary The text discusses the role of Business Energy Advisors in identifying energy-saving opportunities and introducing incentives for upgrading to efficient technologies, as well as promoting energy-saving behaviors for businesses.
hange the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 129 of 206 APPENDIX A-4: CALIFORNIA (PG&E) BACKGROUND Efficiency Nova Scotia has contracted CLEAResult to conduct energy conservation and energy ef...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia has contracted CLEAResult to research best practices in incentive rate setting for energy conservation and efficiency programs, with findings to be used in submissions to the Utility and Review Board (UARB) in Nova Scotia.
fficiency Nova Scotia’s submission to the Utility and Review Board (UARB), Nova Scotia’s regulatory body, and will be publically available. OVERVIEW Jurisdictional Scan State/Province California Utility/Agency Pacific Gas & Electric Fuel E...
AI summary This text outlines Efficiency Nova Scotia's submission to the Utility and Review Board (UARB), and provides an overview of California's electricity market, including key stakeholders involved in energy efficiency programs. It highlights the California Public Utilities Commission, Load Serving Entities, California Energy Commission, and California ISO as key players in the regulation and delivery of energy efficiency and demand management programs.
Cost Effectiveness Testing As detailed in D.14-10-0468, the CPUC has interpreted its mandate to deliver cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation programs as meaning that all energy efficiency portfolios of delivery agents should b...
AI summary The text discusses cost-effectiveness testing in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the use of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) and Program Administration Cost (PAC) tests. California's Standard Practice Manual and DEER database are referenced as benchmarks for evaluating energy efficiency portfolios.
http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyutil.aspx 117 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 134 of 206 PG&E Consumption by Customer Class 35,000 30,000 25,000 GWh 20,000 15,000 10,000...
AI summary The text discusses PG&E's energy efficiency programs, highlighting their success in reducing energy consumption and achieving energy savings goals. It mentions that PG&E has been delivering these programs since 1976 and has kept over 168 million metric tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere through cumulative lifecycle savings.
Standards savings).14 13 http://www.pge.com/en/about/environment/pge/energyefficiency/index.page 14 http://eestats.cpuc.ca.gov/Views/Documents.aspx 118 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachmen...
AI summary The text presents a graph and table showing PG&E's 2013-2015 Gross Energy Savings, comparing goals with achieved results. The data visualizes the energy savings targets and actual outcomes over three years.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 136 of 206 2013-2015 Total Portfolio $/kWh 2013 2014 2015 Gross Savings (kWh) 828,999,924 845,181,086 769,529,791 Spending $ 317,221,372 $ 365,056,021 $ 385,199,846 $/kWh $ 0.38 $ 0.43 $ 0.50 Excludes C&S,E...
AI summary The text provides data on PG&E's energy efficiency programs from 2013 to 2015, including gross savings, spending, and cost-effectiveness ratios. It outlines the incentive-to-administrative spending ratios and highlights the requirement for California PAs to maintain a TRC and PAC greater than 1.
rces to actively study market and technology trends (both 121 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 138 of 206
AI summary The text discusses the importance of studying market and technology trends in energy usage, highlighting a commitment to changing how people use energy. It is part of a regulatory proceeding document filed by NS Power on March 29, 2019.
technologically and economically) while optimizing PG&E’s portfolio of incentivized products based on the technological and market maturity of a measure. It is important to highlight the regulatory approach for communicating incentive leve...
AI summary PG&E outlines its process for evaluating and setting incentive levels for energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the need for regulatory approval and cost-effectiveness analysis. The process involves structured reviews, stakeholder input, and the use of cost-effectiveness models, particularly the E3 model.
sting incentive rate (change in incentive greater than 50 percent). Please note that PG&E uses a streamlined version of the E3 Cost Effectiveness model at each stage in order to calculate preliminary measure level incentives and cost effec...
AI summary PG&E uses a streamlined version of the E3 Cost Effectiveness model to set incentives for energy efficiency measures, ensuring market transformation goals are met while maintaining portfolio-level cost effectiveness. Market research and work papers are used to determine measure performance metrics, costs, and savings calculations, with work papers approved by the Commission before measures are offered with a Public Agency.
tside implementers. The 3Ps have the option to provide “kickers” (increased incentive rates) in order to drive additional market participation in their programs. For programs where the incentives are not fixed but are based on a $/kWh or $...
AI summary The text outlines a process for setting incentives in energy efficiency programs, including considerations such as historical project costs, payback periods, targeted vs. non-targeted incentives, cost effectiveness, and incentive update frequency. The 3Ps have the option to offer increased incentives to boost market participation.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 140 of 206 APPENDIX A-5: OREGON & WASHINGTON (ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON) BACKGROUND Efficiency Nova Scotia has contracted CLEAResult to conduct en...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia has contracted CLEAResult to conduct research on best practices for incentive rate setting in energy conservation and efficiency programs. The research includes interviews with key contacts in other jurisdictions and will be used to optimize program design and delivery for conservation and environmental protection goals. The findings will be submitted to the Utility and Review Board (UARB) and made publicly available.
n Efficiency Nova Scotia’s submission to the Utility and Review Board (UARB), Nova Scotia’s regulatory body, and will be publically available. OVERVIEW Jurisdictional Scan State/Province Oregon, Washington Utility/Agency Energy Trust of Or...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia submitted a document to the Utility and Review Board (UARB), which will be publicly available. The document includes an overview of the Energy Trust of Oregon, which serves multiple utilities across Oregon and Washington, and is regulated by the Oregon Public Utilities Commission and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission.
inistrative and program support costs and maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction. Customers of four utilities in two states now fund and directly benefit from Energy Trust programs. Energy Trust of Oregon Funding Through state le...
AI summary The text discusses how Energy Trust of Oregon is funded through a public purpose charge collected from customers of four utilities in Oregon. The funds support energy efficiency, renewable energy, and low-income housing programs, with Energy Trust acting as an independent third party approved by the OPUC.
through an agreement with NW Natural and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Energy Trust began serving NW Natural's customers in Washington. The last piece of Energy Trust funding is separate legislation passed in 2007...
AI summary Energy Trust expanded its energy-efficiency programs after 2008, particularly following the passage of SB 838, which allowed utilities to fund more cost-effective energy efficiency. Savings doubled from 2009 to 2013, and natural gas savings also increased significantly during this period.
Natural Gas Savings (MM 6.0 6.1 5.8 6.0 Therms) INCENTIVE-TO-ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE RATIOS Below are the incentive-to-administration expense ratios by year obtained from the annual approved budgets for the Energy Trust’s Annual Budget and...
AI summary The document presents incentive-to-administration expense ratios for energy efficiency programs from 2013 to 2016 and outlines the 2015-2019 strategic plan goal of achieving 240 average megawatts of electricity and 24 million therms of natural gas savings. It highlights the balance between incentive costs and administrative expenses.
y Between 2015 and 2019, save 24 million annual therms (MMTh) of natural gas 13 http://assets.energytrust.org/api/assets/plans/2015-2019_Strategic_Plan0.pdf 129 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-1...
AI summary The document references Energy Trust's energy savings targets for the period between 2015 and 2019, including the goal to save 24 million annual therms (MMTh) of natural gas. It also includes figures related to cumulative electric and natural gas savings targets.
Benefits (Avoided Costs) In the societal test, the Energy Trust will include the following benefits: 1. The value of the electrical and/or gas energy saved based on the avoided cost forecasts of the utilities whose customers are served by...
AI summary The Energy Trust includes benefits such as avoided costs, non-energy benefits, line losses, and natural gas capacity benefits in its societal test. These benefits are based on forecasts from utilities and the PUC, and include a 10 percent credit for energy efficiency as required by the Northwest Power Act and OPUC Docket UM-551.
Program Utility Cost Test Benefit Cost Ratio Benefit Cost Ratio New Homes and Products 2.0 1.7 Existing Homes 2.0 2.5 Existing Building (including Multifamily) 2.5 1.7 New Buildings 3.0 1.9 Production Efficiency 3.5 2.0 18 http://edocs.puc...
AI summary The text presents a table showing benefit cost ratios for various energy efficiency programs, including new homes, existing homes, and building efficiency initiatives. The table includes data from external sources and is part of a larger document related to utility cost tests and energy efficiency programs.
ess tests at the portfolio level, it allows the Energy Trust to examine the effect of measure with lower cost effectiveness and thus manage program delivery and promotion efforts accordingly. MEASURE DEVELOPMENT & INCENTIVE SETTING PROCESS...
AI summary The Energy Trust employs a four-step process to introduce new measures and set maximum eligible incentives, allowing for effective program delivery and promotion. This process helps balance incentive levels with delivery and administration expenses.
• If measure is sufficient available identified as a good fit and reliable data, for current program, it strong stakeholder is promoted to the interest, cost effective detailed development and proper timing and stage fit it is promoted to...
AI summary The text outlines a process for evaluating energy efficiency measures, promoting those with sufficient data and stakeholder support to the approval stage, while piloting those with insufficient data. This relates to energy efficiency program development and evaluation.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 150 of 206 Considerations for vetting ideas, measures and measure updates Below are the considerations taken by the Energy Trust and its progra...
AI summary The document outlines considerations for vetting new energy efficiency measures or updating existing ones, including savings potential, budget impact, long-term strategy alignment, stakeholder interest, risk analysis, market availability, and previous experience with the measure.
g measure Market availability and maturity Market acceptance Market timing Energy Trust previous experience with the measure
AI summary The text outlines criteria for evaluating measures, focusing on market factors such as availability, maturity, acceptance, timing, and the Energy Trust's prior experience with the measure.
Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) What is a MAD: It is the decision of record determining measure cost effectiveness and authorizing use of a measure. The measure is clearly defined along with the conditions under which it is approved. Th...
AI summary The Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) outlines the process for determining the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency measures and authorizing their use. It includes sections such as valid dates, scope, program eligibility, market segments, measure descriptions, cost-effectiveness results, incentives, and requirements. All MADs are approved by Energy Trust engineering staff.
rticipation limits and data collection requirements) Baseline Conditions Savings: Describe what the measure savings are and how they are to be calculated along with the assumptions Measure Costs: Includes how to account for the costs...
AI summary The document outlines key considerations for setting energy efficiency measure incentives, including the relationship between incentives and incremental costs, impact on market uptake, and the balance between incentives and program delivery within the context of a total portfolio cost effectiveness and budget.
st.org/library/forms/2016_OPUC_Performance_Measures.pdf 135 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 152 of 206 APPENDIX A: MEASURE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 136 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 N...
AI summary This section of the document outlines the measure development process and includes geographic definitions related to Consolidated Edison of New York (Con Ed), which serves New York City and Westchester County.
The New York Independent System Operator: The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) operates the wholesale markets to manage the flow of electricity across the state. PORTFOLIO MATURITY AND HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE6 In the 1980s to 19...
AI summary The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) manages wholesale electricity markets in New York. The text discusses historical energy efficiency programs in New York, including significant spending from the 1980s to 1990s and the establishment of the System Benefits Charge (SBC) in 1996. These programs led to substantial energy savings, though they were later scaled back.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 157 of 206 Figure 41: NYSERDA Efficiency Programs: Energy Savings and Program Costs: 1998-20097 The figure above summarizes NYSERDA administered programs from 1998- 2008. It also includes three energy effic...
AI summary The document discusses NYSERDA's energy efficiency programs from 1998 to 2008, including programs administered on behalf of Consolidated Edison, National Fuel Gas, and National Grid. It outlines New York State's electricity use reduction target of 15% for the 2008-2015 period as part of the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS), divided into two phases.
ed&S ectorSubsector=2:3,1~3:2,1~1:2,1 142 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 159 of 206 Multi- Program Small family Names Accumulated C&I C&I Business Residential Appliance Resid...
AI summary The text presents a table with program names and associated energy savings data, including categories like C&I, residential, and multifamily, as well as specific programs such as energy efficiency rebates and equipment installations.
mes HVAC Install Income Energy Efficiency Equipment Rebate Gas Efficiency 2009 765 N/A N/A N/A N/A
AI summary The document includes a table with data related to energy efficiency programs, including HVAC installation income and rebates for energy efficiency equipment and gas efficiency, with values provided for the year 2009.
Discontinued Residential Electric Program. Targets (85%) 2015 2015 remain the same Up to September Figure 46: Gas Savings Results9 COST EFFECTIVENESS TESTING Estimating Energy Savings The Commission approves a series of technical manuals t...
AI summary The document discusses the Discontinued Residential Electric Program with a target of 85%. It also covers cost effectiveness testing, including the use of TRC to evaluate energy savings and the inclusion of avoided supply costs in TRC calculations.
2013 852,363 2014 1,251,943 1,399,660 Up 2015 to September 2015 INCENTIVE RATE SETTING2 The incentive setting process involves collaborative discussions between the utilities, NYSERDA and other interested stakeholders. The goal is to achie...
AI summary The text outlines the incentive rate setting process involving utilities, NYSERDA, and stakeholders, aiming for statewide uniformity in qualifying technology and incentive levels. It also lists existing programs under the EEPS, including a residential electric rebate program for HVAC systems, electric heat pump water heaters, and programmable thermostats.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 161 of 206 customers with old window or http://www.coned.com/energyefficiency/residential_bounty_program.as wall or air conditioning units. p R...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency programs offered by Con Edison, including rebates for residential and business customers for upgrading to energy-efficient appliances and installing thermostats, along with additional incentives for existing smart thermostats.
(Electric) appliances. https://www.conedhvacrebates.com/assets/pdf/CE_Resi_Appliance_Re bate_App_WRITEABLE.pdf For residential customers who Bring Your have already purchased a $85 given with an agreement of participating in the two year p...
AI summary The text provides information about rebate programs for residential customers in Nova Scotia, specifically for purchasing qualifying thermostats and participating in a two-year air-conditioner adjustment program. A $85 rebate is offered with an agreement to participate in the program.
willing to participate in a two year http://www.coned.com/energyefficiency/bring_your_own_thermostat.as (Electric) air-conditioner adjustment p program.
AI summary The text references a two-year program related to air-conditioner adjustments, specifically mentioning a link to Con Edison's energy efficiency initiative involving thermostats.
Small Small business looking to save Free on-site energy efficiency survey, then have energy-saving lighting Business money and energy. or refrigeration equipment installed. ConEd will pay up to 70% of the Direct Install cost directly to t...
AI summary Con Edison offers energy efficiency programs for small businesses and neighborhoods, including free on-site surveys, energy-saving equipment installations, and incentives. Businesses pay only the difference after Con Edison covers up to 70% of costs. Neighborhood initiatives include free lighting, water heating, and refrigeration products, with incentives based on specific operational needs.
and each will have its own specific incentives and opportunities based on Con Edison’s operational needs in those specific areas. Free in-unit direct installation, free common area direction installation, Multi-family custom measures at $0...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs for multifamily customers, including incentives for direct installation and custom measures, with specific opportunities based on Con Edison’s operational needs. It also includes a URL for more information on multifamily rebates.
Rebates for lighting and controls http://cdn.platform.honestbuildings.com/wp- content/uploads/sites/5/2016/02/Lighting-and-LEDs_v14.pdf HVAC, furnaces, boilers and chillers http://cdn.platform.honestbuildings.com/wp- content/uploads/sites/...
AI summary The document outlines prescriptive rebate programs available to commercial and industrial customers for upgrading equipment such as lighting, HVAC systems, furnaces, boilers, motors, and VFDs. Rebates are capped at 50% or specific monetary limits, and a TRC test is required to ensure the benefit exceeds the costs.
content/uploads/sites/5/2015/12/EE-Study_v4.pdf Gas) 146 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 163 of 206 APPENDIX A-7: NEW YORK (NYSERDA) SUMMARY Jurisdictional Scan State/Province...
AI summary This section provides an overview of the electricity market in New York, highlighting key entities such as the New York Department of Public Service, NYSERDA, and the New York Independent System Operator. It outlines the jurisdictional context for energy regulation and management in the region.
ission) New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) New York Independent System Operator (NY-ISO) Electricity Utilities New York Public Service Commission The New York Public Service Commission regulates and ov...
AI summary The text outlines the regulatory framework in New York, highlighting the roles of the New York Public Service Commission, the NY-ISO, and electric utilities. The Public Service Commission oversees energy conservation programs and released the REV strategy to promote renewable energy and advanced energy management. The NY-ISO manages wholesale electricity markets and provides planning data.
rate in the state of New York. Customers of these utilities are eligible for their own utility programs as well as NYSERDA programs. Double-dipping of incentives by customers is not allowed. Central Hudson (Central Hudson Gas & Electric...
AI summary The text lists electricity generation sources in New York in 2013, highlighting the contribution of various resources such as natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, and renewables. It also mentions utility companies in New York and notes that customers are eligible for both utility and NYSERDA programs, with a prohibition on double-dipping of incentives.
33% Hydroelectric 22% Other Renewables 6% NYSERDA OVERVIEW NYSERDA s mandate is to promote energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources. The objectives are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, accelerate economic growth and red...
AI summary NYSERDA's mandate includes promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and customer energy bills. The organization is primarily funded by the Systems Benefit Charge (SBC), which supports energy conservation programs and has recently transitioned to the Clean Energy Fund (CEF). NYSERDA collaborates with various stakeholders to advance New York's clean energy economy.
2016. The SBC is used to fund the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS). Recently, the EEPS has been replaced by the Clean Energy Fund (CEF). Other sources of funding include: Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Renewable P...
AI summary The System Benefits Charge (SBC) funds the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS), which has been replaced by the Clean Energy Fund (CEF). Other funding sources include the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). The RGGI is focused on energy efficiency and carbon abatement, while the RPS is focused on acquiring renewable energy. Retail electricity prices for Con Edison customers in 2014 are also provided.
able Not Available Not Available 2015 Not Available Not Available Not Available Future Targets Year Electricity Savings Expenditure Cost Effectiveness 2016 Not Available Not Available Not Available 2017 Not Available Not Available Not Avai...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for setting incentive levels in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing alignment with program design and objectives. It notes that commercial programs typically offer prescriptive incentives capped at 50 percent, with exceptions for 'jump-started' measures, such as for agricultural customers, where incentives can reach up to 70 percent.
Attachment 1 Page 167 of 206 APPENDIX A-8: VERMONT (EFFICIENCY VERMONT) SUMMARY Jurisdictional Scan State/Province Vermont Utility/Agency Efficiency Vermont (Vermont Energy Investment Corporation) Fuel Electricity, Gas, Heating Fuels Key C...
AI summary This document provides an overview of the electricity market in Vermont, highlighting key entities such as Efficiency Vermont, the Vermont Public Services Board, ISO New England, and Vermont Electric Power Company. It outlines the structure of the electricity system and identifies key contacts and consultants involved in the jurisdictional scan.
Efficiency Vermont was the first state-wide energy efficiency utility of its kind in North America. It was established in 1999 through regulation from the PSB. Efficiency Vermont runs through a contract between the PSB and VEIC, the curren...
AI summary Efficiency Vermont was established in 1999 by the PSB to administer state-wide energy efficiency programs. It operates through a contract with VEIC, an independent not-for-profit. The PSB oversees the EEU Program and sets the Energy Efficiency Charge (EEC) on utility bills. Burlington Electric Department also administers similar programs.
nd review the performance of those resources. For the current cycle, the electricity efficiency is provided by Efficiency Vermont and Burlington Electric Department. ISO New England (ISO-NE) is the Regional Transmission Organization (RTO)...
AI summary The text discusses the role of Efficiency Vermont and Burlington Electric Department in providing electricity efficiency in the current cycle. It also introduces ISO New England (ISO-NE), its objectives, and Vermont Electric Power Company (VELCO), which operates Vermont’s bulk transmission system and participates in regional planning with ISO-NE. The document also lists the number and types of electric utilities in Vermont.
The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) contains members from Efficiency Vermont, PSB, Burlington Electric Department and other stakeholders to resolve any issues with the annual savings verification process and to track implementation of any r...
AI summary The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) includes stakeholders like Efficiency Vermont and PSB to oversee savings verification and implementation of recommendations. The TRM outlines methods for calculating energy savings, using deemed and calculation-based approaches. An audit from 2015 showed cost-effectiveness metrics, with Efficiency Vermont using the SCT instead of TRC for measure and portfolio-level evaluations.
s must pass the SCT screening, but exceptions do occur for a variety of reasons. For example, low income programs have an additional 15 percent adder for benefits to reflect the societal value of efficiency in the low income market. Avoide...
AI summary The document discusses the Societal Cost Test (SCT) and its application, including exceptions for low-income programs. It also outlines avoided costs for Vermont, including categories such as avoided capacity and energy costs, transmission and distribution costs, and CO2 costs. Efficiency Vermont is described as an energy efficiency program serving most of Vermont.
5,675 64,937 9,848.0 15.17 Village of Morrisville - (VT) VT Municipal 3,986 44,827 7,119.0 15.88 Village of Northfield - (VT) VT Municipal 1,866 29,570 3,998.8 13.52 Village of Swanton - (VT) VT Municipal 3,632 53,710 6,791.0 12.64 Washing...
AI summary Efficiency Vermont, established in 1999 as North America's first energy efficiency utility, has delivered significant energy savings, including 12.7 million MWhs in savings since 2000. The programs have been successful in reducing energy consumption and promoting energy-efficient behaviors and investment decisions, with notable results between 2012 and 2014.
ery successful at reducing energy consumption and incentivizing energy efficient behaviours and investment decisions. In the 2012-2014 period, Efficiency Vermont had the following results: 158 We change the way people use energy Date Filed...
AI summary Efficiency Vermont successfully reduced energy consumption and incentivized energy-efficient behaviors and investment decisions during the 2012-2014 period. The document outlines spending for 2013 and 2014, with 48% and 55% of the budget allocated to incentives, respectively, and spending per kWh ratios of $0.36/kWh and $0.46/kWh.
Spending per kWh Ratios 2013 48% $0.36/kWh 2014 55% $0.46/kWh Cost Effectiveness Efficiency Vermont is not held to a direct cost effectiveness metric, but the plan must meet associated savings, spending and total resource benefit targets....
AI summary The text discusses the cost effectiveness of Efficiency Vermont's energy efficiency programs, highlighting spending per kWh ratios, savings targets, and a new product development process involving nine stages. The 2015-2017 period has a savings target of 321,800 MWh with a budget of $174 million. The cost effectiveness projections are expected to slightly decrease compared to historical performance.
EFFICIENCY VERMONT CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Program Program Area Program Measures (Prescriptive Incentives) Links Name Lighting Equipment https://www.efficiencyvermont.co Agricultural Rebates are paid after pur...
AI summary This document outlines the Efficiency Vermont core program offerings for residential and business customers, focusing on agricultural equipment rebates and appliance incentives. Rebates are provided after purchase and submission of a rebate form, with certain products qualifying based on a list or specifications.
s Rebates are paid after purchase and submission of rebate form. All rebated products are qualified through a qualifying product list. Advanced Power Strips Incentive provided through a coupon at participating https://contractors.efficie...
AI summary The text describes a rebate program for energy-efficient products, such as advanced power strips, which are paid after purchase and submission of a rebate form. Products must be qualified through a qualifying product list, and incentives are provided through coupons at participating retailers.
Rebates are paid after purchase and submission of mont.com/rebates Equipment rebate form. Certain products are qualified through a qualifying product list or through provided specifications. 163 We change the way people use energy Date Fil...
AI summary The document outlines rebate and incentive programs for energy-efficient lighting products, including CFLs and LEDs, with minimum price requirements and incentives provided at participating retailers.
Incentives are either prescriptive or quasi-prescriptive based on equipment characteristics. Insulation and Building Envelope (Up to $2,000) Heating System Incentive ($500) https://www.efficiencyvermont.co Home m/Media/Default/docs/reb...
AI summary The text discusses residential energy efficiency incentives, including insulation, HVAC equipment, lighting, and appliances, with a focus on participation requirements and reimbursement processes through Efficiency Vermont.
Lighting m/Media/Default/docs/services/b Residential/ Appliances New rochures/efficiency-vermont- Commercial residential-new-construction- Construction Up to $2,000 in incentives. The home has to be issued specifications-and-incentives...
AI summary Efficiency Maine is the organization responsible for promoting energy efficiency and alternative energy programs across the state of Maine, USA, including both electric and gas fuel initiatives.
for developing, planning, coordinating and implementing energy efficiency and alternative energy resource programs in the entire state; this includes electric and gas fuel programs. LOAD AND CONSUMPTION INFORMATION (ELECTRIC) Electricity i...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency and alternative energy programs in Maine, including electricity distribution by ISO New England and Northern Maine Independent System Operator, along with customer account numbers and electricity rates for residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.
type=0 3 U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Average retail price of electricity to ultimate customers,” http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#sales (February 2015) 165 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019...
AI summary The document includes references to electricity retail sales data and net electricity generation by source in Maine from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. It also includes figures related to energy consumption and generation.
MARKET STRUCTURE OVERVIEW The Efficiency Maine Trust Act came in effect in 2009 and is responsible for Efficiency Maine’s inception as an independent Trust. Their purpose is to develop, plan, coordinate, and implement energy efficiency/alt...
AI summary The Efficiency Maine Trust Act, effective in 2009, established Efficiency Maine as an independent trust to develop and implement energy efficiency programs in Maine. The trust has set ambitious energy savings goals, including weatherizing homes, reducing peak load demand, and cutting fossil fuel consumption, with a focus on cost-effective measures and job creation in the clean energy sector.
ts/kWh. The cost of saving heating fuels (heating oil, propane, natural gas, wood, and kerosene) through weatherization and high-efficiency heating equipment averaged $12.96/MMBtu. PORTFOLIO MATURITY AND HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE DSM programs...
AI summary The text discusses the cost savings from energy efficiency programs, focusing on the cost of saving heating fuels through weatherization and high-efficiency heating equipment. It also outlines the history and performance of Efficiency Maine, including its triennial plans and annual performance reports from 2011 to 2015.
O16444_AnnualReport_2010.pdf 11 Efficiency Maine, captured from Efficiency Maine’s “Annual Reports” between 2011-2015 http://www.efficiencymaine.com/about/library/reports/ 169 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019...
AI summary The document references Efficiency Maine's annual reports from 2011 to 2015, highlighting gas and electricity savings achieved during this period. It includes figures showing total gas savings and gross electricity savings, with data spanning multiple years.
ents/suca/ cost effectiveness.pdf TRC is used at the measure level based on net savings for introduction of measures and performance reviews and must be greater than 1.0. Avoided Costs TRC: The benefits included are the avoided costs of en...
AI summary The document discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) methodology used in energy efficiency programs, emphasizing avoided costs and program-level costs. It highlights the use of TRC at both the measure and program levels, including benefits such as avoided energy costs and reductions in infrastructure needs, and outlines the components of avoided electricity and gas costs.
INCENTIVE LEVEL-SETTING Note the Trust is in the middle of a transition on the process for setting incentives. At the time of writing this report, the MPUC had not yet decided on the process. For the first two Triennial plan periods, one o...
AI summary Efficiency Maine is in the process of setting incentive levels for energy efficiency programs, with the MPUC expressing concerns about overall cost effectiveness. The Trust has proposed a third plan, but the process for adjusting incentives has not yet been finalized. Market research and stakeholder engagement are part of the process.
and costs. This will include data from utilities and consulting stakeholders such as contractors, vendors, customers and advocacy groups. 2. Technical Reference Manual 175 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS P...
AI summary The document discusses the development of Technical Reference Manuals (TRMs) by Efficiency Maine for residential and commercial energy efficiency measures, as well as the calculation of incremental costs for incentive programs. It outlines the process for determining and finalizing incentive rates based on market research and technology considerations.
EXISTING PROGRAMS 13 Name Target Market Incentive Information Home Energy Savings Residential customers who are looking Air sealing with assessment: $400, a Program (Residential) to weatherize, reduce GHG, and bonus of $100 provided with o...
AI summary The Home Energy Savings Program targets residential customers seeking to weatherize, reduce GHG emissions, and improve energy efficiency. Incentives include air sealing with assessment, insulation, supplemental heating systems, and whole house heating systems, with specific monetary values provided for each measure.
Additional incentives available for Unitil, Maine NG, Bangor NG customers Low Income Home Energy Residential customers who are Air sealing with building performance Savings Program currently participating in LIHEAP institute (BPI) assessme...
AI summary The document outlines additional incentives for Unitil, Maine NG, and Bangor NG customers, including details about the Low Income Home Energy Savings Program and specific rebates for energy efficiency upgrades. Efficiency Maine is referenced as a source of information on these programs.
We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 194 of 206 Name Target Market Incentive Information underbelly, repair/insulate/seal door or hatch, seal/insulate heat ducts or pipes, addition...
AI summary The document outlines an incentive program aimed at improving energy efficiency through measures such as air sealing and insulation. It includes details on target markets and specific actions to be taken.
hatch, seal/insulate heat ducts or pipes, additional six hours of air sealing
AI summary The text refers to actions related to improving energy efficiency, such as sealing and insulating heat ducts or pipes and additional air sealing, which are part of energy efficiency initiatives.
ricity, Gas Key Contact/Interviewee Ellen Pfeiffer Consultant Mayuran Srikantha JURISDICTION OVERVIEW Overview of Electricity Market The following entities make up the electricity system in Massachusetts. National Grid Massachusetts Go...
AI summary The document provides an overview of the electricity market in Massachusetts, listing key entities such as National Grid, ISO New England, and Mass Save®. It outlines the jurisdictional structure and highlights the involvement of various organizations in the energy sector.
gy Efficiency Advisory Council Other Major Electric Utilities o Eversource Energy o Unitil o Cape Light Compact
AI summary The text lists entities involved in energy efficiency initiatives, including the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council and other major electric utilities such as Eversource Energy, Unitil, and Cape Light Compact.
l Grid. The initiative is also supported by energy efficiency service providers and the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. The Mass Save portfolio covers both electricity and natural gas efficiency programs throughout Massachuse...
AI summary The text discusses the Mass Save initiative, supported by energy efficiency service providers and the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, covering both electricity and natural gas efficiency programs. It also describes ISO New England's role in managing New England's bulk power generation and transmission system, overseeing the wholesale electricity market, and managing regional planning.
neration and transmission system 2. Oversee and ensure fair administration of region’s wholesale electricity market 3. Manage a comprehensive regional planning process The Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) is responsible for guidin...
AI summary The text outlines the responsibilities of the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council (EEAC) in Massachusetts, including guiding energy efficiency efforts, collaborating with utilities, and publishing reports. It also mentions National Grid, NSTAR, WMECO, and Cape Light Compact, along with their roles in energy efficiency programs.
enerated comes from large scale generators and CHP units, while the rest comes from electric utilities. The majority of generators participate in ISO-New England’s capacity market. MASSACHUSETTS ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM INCENTIVE AND COST...
AI summary Massachusetts leads in energy efficiency, with utilities required to prioritize cost-effective programs under the Green Communities Act. The state's 2016-2018 plan targets 4,122 GWh of savings, funded by sources like the Systems Benefit Charge, Forward Capacity Market, and cap and trade programs. 10% of the budget must support low-income initiatives.
3,753 60,518 8,298.1 13.71 Town of Wakefield - (MA) MA Municipal 12,407 194,441 26,014.0 13.38 Town of Wellesley - (MA) MA Municipal 10,032 242,936 31,596.9 13.01 Western Massachusetts Electric MA Investor Owned 188,299 1,825,087 296,597.3...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency savings and expenditures by National Grid for the 2013-2015 cycle, including residential sector savings of 805,157 MWh and total expenditures of $290,842,401, with $222,323,354 allocated to incentive expenditures. The data has not undergone the full EM&V process and is not finalized.
Massachusetts.106 National Grid’s individual target and budget for 2016-2018 is 1,939 GWh and $897.6 million. The overall target is 2.94 percent of retail electricity sales. 104 Data from Masssavedata.com 105 2013-2015 Plan: http://www.mas...
AI summary The document outlines National Grid's 2016-2018 energy efficiency targets and budget, as well as its incentive level setting methodology, which includes customer market research, technology research, and stakeholder discussions. It also lists core program offerings for residential and business sectors.
NATIONAL GRID CORE PROGRAM OFFERINGS (RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS) Program Name Program Area Program Measures Links For homeowners of 1-to-4 unit homes For landlords of 1-to-4 unit homes For multifamily facilities with 5+ units http://w...
AI summary This section outlines National Grid's core program offerings, focusing on residential and business energy efficiency initiatives, particularly the No Cost Home Energy Assessment program, which provides online assessments for homeowners, landlords, and multifamily facilities.
ergy assessment idential/mass- energy-rebate Instant Price Discounts at Participating Retailers and for Online Catalogue for qualified ENERGY STAR CFL and LED lamps and fixtures Instant Price Discounts for Online Catalogue for Lighting...
AI summary The document outlines various rebate and discount programs aimed at promoting energy efficiency, including instant price discounts for ENERGY STAR certified products, mail-in rebates for specific appliances, and programs for retiring inefficient appliances.
ling Income thermostat ( up to $100) and programmable thermostats (up to $25)
AI summary The text mentions income-related rebates for thermostats, including up to $100 for standard thermostats and up to $25 for programmable thermostats.
Roof upgrades ($3.00/sqft), exterior walls ($3.50/sqft) and basement insulation ($2.00/sqft) to perform better than current building code http://www.mass Deep Energy Performance incentive of $1.75 per CFM reduced save.com/en/res Reside...
AI summary The text outlines various residential energy efficiency programs, including incentives for roof upgrades, exterior wall insulation, and basement insulation, as well as performance-based rebates and access to financing options like the HEAT Loan Program. It also mentions the availability of online or mail-in rebate submissions and links to additional resources.
installation/early Rebates -heating-and- cooling- equipment- 186 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 203 of 206 replacement- rebates
AI summary The text mentions rebates related to heating and cooling equipment, as well as replacement rebates. It highlights efforts to change how people use energy, likely in the context of energy efficiency programs.
replacement- rebates
AI summary The text mentions 'replacement rebates', which likely refers to financial incentives provided for replacing old or inefficient appliances with more energy-efficient alternatives. This is a common practice in energy efficiency programs to encourage sustainable consumption.
75 percent on costs of insulation up to $2,000 http://www.mass Insulation Potential to receive no-cost targeted sealing of air save.com/en/res Residential leaks improvements idential/offers/w eatherization Select from the qualifying...
AI summary The text outlines various residential energy efficiency programs, including insulation incentives, air sealing, wireless thermostat installation, and energy efficiency upgrades with incentives ranging from $275 to $7,000. These programs require collaboration with a HERS rater or qualified personnel.
ial New Incentive details are in the appendix Residential rebates Construction
AI summary The text references incentive details for residential construction rebates, which are outlined in an appendix. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding discussing energy efficiency programs.
http://www.mass save.com/en/res idential/offers/rn c-performance- path Provides incentives for lighting and lighting controls, variable speed drives, food service equipment, gas-fired heating and water heating equipment through online or...
AI summary The text outlines incentive programs for energy efficiency measures, including lighting, lighting controls, variable speed drives, and natural gas heating and water heating equipment. These incentives are available through online or mail-in rebate submissions and are categorized as prescriptive or quasi-prescriptive based on specific criteria.
heating incentives are prescriptive/quasi-prescriptive based on size Large Retrofit (MBH) or AFUE rating http://www.mass Commercial Program Food service incentives cover fryers, convection save.com/busin ovens, steam cookers, griddles, c...
AI summary The heating incentives program includes prescriptive and quasi-prescriptive incentives for large commercial retrofits, with specific coverage for food service equipment and custom incentives based on project economics. Engineering studies are also supported with partial cost reimbursement.
wner or operator of residential building with 5 or more units. An energy assessment is offered that energy savings opportunities for the http://www.mass building envelope, as well as lighting and save.com/en/bu Multi-Family mechanical syst...
AI summary The document describes a program offering energy assessments and incentives for multi-family and commercial buildings, encouraging the use of the EPA’s Portfolio Manager tool for benchmarking performance.
ns for magnitude of incentive and review protocol; 190 We change the way people use energy Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 32 Efficiency Nova Scotia Marketing Evaluation Plan December 12, 2017 Prepared by 3...
AI summary The document is a Marketing Evaluation Plan prepared by Research Into Action, Inc. for Efficiency Nova Scotia, dated December 12, 2017. It outlines the evaluation of marketing efforts related to energy efficiency programs.
..................... A-1 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 2 Page 5 of 32 Executive Summary In late 2015 and continuing into 2016, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) launched a major refresh of its brand and restructuring of...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) undertook a brand refresh and restructuring of its marketing and communications function in late 2015 and 2016. The initiative aimed to increase program participation, enhance customer experience through digital assets, and improve marketing effectiveness via internal processes and tools. Research Into Action developed a marketing evaluation plan to assess progress toward these goals.
lize its long-term goals. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 2 Page 7 of 32 1. Introduction In late 2015 and continuing into 2016, Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) launched a major refresh of its brand and restructuring of it...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) undertook a marketing and communications restructuring in 2015-2016, setting goals to increase program participation, enhance customer experience, and improve marketing effectiveness. This document outlines a marketing evaluation plan to assess progress toward these goals annually.
keting campaigns. It builds on the logic model and associated indicator tables, and on the best practices criteria, prepared as part of ENS’s 2016/17 marketing evaluation.3 The next section of this document presents background information...
AI summary This document outlines changes made by ENS to its marketing activities in mid-2016, including the consolidation of marketing and communications services and the hiring of a new manager. These changes led to shifts in marketing processes, strategies, and products, with new campaigns launching in April 2017.
ts in ENS’s marketing development and support processes, creative development, overall look and feel, positioning, marketing strategies and tactics, and marketing products. For the 2016/2017 marketing evaluation, Research Into Action devel...
AI summary The document outlines an evaluation plan for ENS’s marketing efforts, building on a previous 2016/2017 evaluation. It includes tasks such as reviewing marketing plans, brand guidelines, and campaign materials to monitor progress and identify refinements needed for future marketing initiatives.
the marketing logic model. Consistent with the assumption that logic models are living documents, these indicators can change as program assumptions and conditions change. Research Into Action reviewed some of the materials in Table 1 as p...
AI summary The document discusses the need for Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) to review and update marketing materials and tracking systems, with specific priority items highlighted for review. The review process will focus on ensuring clarity, completeness, and responsiveness to user feedback.
• Identification of targeted segments reached and not reached • Average number of projects per trade ally; changes over time 3.2. Primary Data Collection Table 2 through Table 5 show the target groups, population sizes, sample sizes, poten...
AI summary The text discusses primary data collection methods for evaluating ENS's marketing efforts, including interviews, check-ins, surveys, and focus groups. It emphasizes the need to assess targeted segments, track changes over time, and use findings to refine marketing infrastructure and campaigns. The evaluation also considers ENS's recent restructuring and campaign updates.
ts. We also recommend ENS conduct brief interviews with its BDMs and ESAs in future years to take maximum advantage of their knowledge from working directly with customers. Because ENS’s Efficiency Trade Network (ETN) is still in its early...
AI summary The text recommends that ENS conduct interviews with BDMs and ESAs to leverage their customer insights, while delaying interviews with ETN partners until the network is more established. It also suggests coordinating marketing evaluations with ongoing research to reduce respondent burden and improve survey efficiency.
Table 2. In-Depth Interviews (or Check-Ins) Estimated Target Sample Population Representative Indicators / Evaluation Questions Suggested Timeframe Group Size Size • Observe that staff understand, are enthusiastic, and are motivated by bra...
AI summary This table outlines in-depth interviews or check-ins for ENS marketing managers, focusing on evaluating the effectiveness of branding, marketing plan implementation, communication processes, and alignment between marketing and program staff. The suggested timeframe for these evaluations is 1 to 3 years, with subsequent evaluations.
IDIs with program staff reporting needs (e.g., identifying previous participants for Short-term Outcomes potential reconnections) • Gaps identified in system capabilities • Users’ "wish list" of system capabilities to enhance decision- mak...
AI summary The text outlines short-term and medium-term outcomes related to feedback mechanisms and system capabilities, focusing on identifying gaps, enhancing decision-making, and ensuring system updates are promptly addressed by marketing and program staff.
President [email protected] Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 3 of 94 Overview Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) retained Research Into Action to evaluate three practices and procedures areas in their...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) commissioned Research Into Action to evaluate practices and procedures in Incentive Setting, Business Development, and Training and Development. The findings are presented in three volumes, with Volume 1 focusing on Incentive Setting practices and procedures.
e Setting February 9, 2018 Prepared for: Efficiency Nova Scotia Prepared By: Research Into Action, Inc. Linda Dethman Ellen Rubinstein Joe Van Clock Doré Mangan In conjunction with Corporate Research Associates, Inc. Date Filed: March 29,...
AI summary The document is a report prepared for Efficiency Nova Scotia by Research Into Action, Inc. and Corporate Research Associates, Inc. It was filed on March 29, 2019, and is related to a proceeding involving NS Power.
res Evaluation Volume 3: Training and Development Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 6 of 94 1. Introduction This evaluation report presents findings from an initial process assessment of the incentive setting proc...
AI summary This evaluation report assesses the incentive setting process at Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) based on the CLEAResult report and EfficiencyOne’s Implementation Plan. ENS submitted these documents in 2016 and 2017, and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board accepted them in 2017. Research Into Action was contracted to conduct an independent review of ENS’s implementation progress.
Table 1 describes the documents referred to throughout this report, including the abbreviated titles that are sometimes used. Table 1. Document References for This Report Title Date of most Author Description Abbreviation recent modificati...
AI summary This document outlines the background and context of a project reviewing the incentive setting process at Energy Nova Scotia (ENS). It references several documents, including the Incentive Setting Methodology, Implementation Plan, Manual, and Workbook, and discusses findings related to staff experience and ENS compliance with recommendations.
nce using the Incentive Setting Workbook, the broader decision process around incentive setting, and ENS compliance with the CLEAResult report and the Implementation Plan. 1.1. Incentive Setting Process Overview In response to stakeholder...
AI summary ENS developed an Incentive Setting Manual and Workbook following the CLEAResult report and Implementation Plan, in response to stakeholder feedback during the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process. The tools aim to provide a systematic approach to setting and reviewing incentives for energy efficiency measures.
manager to lead the incentive review across the program components. The lead reviewer will consult, as needed, with managers of the other affected program components during this process. In addition to developing this process for incentive...
AI summary ENS is conducting an evaluation of the incentive setting process for its programs, including financial simulations and market research. The evaluation focuses on the ease of obtaining information, decisions made, and compliance with the Implementation Plan. The goal is to improve and scale the process for 2018.
ram staff also noted that the “Customer Findings” tab was difficult to complete in some cases because ENS evaluation reports did not present findings at the measure level. 2.2.3. Situations Not Captured Interview findings suggest that the...
AI summary The document highlights challenges with the Workbook used for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including difficulties in completing the 'Customer Findings' tab due to incomplete data from ENS reports, and issues with handling complex incentive structures, tiered incentives, and multiple delivery models. Staff suggested improvements such as a central reference source, better prioritization of fields, and more support from ENS regulatory staff.
g these data, program staff said they focused on the cost of efficient products, with two also noting they considered what incentive levels consumers would find attractive. Several program staff elaborated on how they previously tackled in...
AI summary Program staff discussed past and current approaches to setting incentives for energy efficiency programs. Previously, they focused on product costs and incentive caps, but the current process requires broader considerations such as baseline product prices and market potential, which they find challenging.
market characteristics, customer insights, and supply chain and stakeholder insights. The Workbooks the evaluation team reviewed demonstrate that this research has occurred. 4.2.2. Formal Research ENS’s Two-Year Incentive Setting Research...
AI summary ENS has committed to conducting formal research on incentive setting, focusing on price sensitivity analysis for various energy efficiency measures. The research plan includes residential and commercial LED lighting, heat pumps, and insulation, with a budget of $150,000 annually. The research is on track to be completed by late 2017 or early 2018. ENS has also been tasked with completing an electronic Technical Reference Manual.
sonably modeled using the recommended thresholds. Examples include the whole home program components (Home Energy Assessment and New Home Construction). Custom incentives are, by definition, customized and use incentive-setting algorithm...
AI summary The document discusses the incentive-setting process for energy efficiency programs, noting that while the new Workbook approach is consistent and broader, it requires significant staff time and may need streamlining. Custom incentives and program components with incentive caps are also mentioned.
may differ between programs within a single market sector Unmerged Cells: One user reported that cells that should be merged were not, specifically noting cells for ’Measure Name’, ‘Program Offerings and Incentive’ and ‘Incentive Offerin...
AI summary The text discusses user-reported issues with a program's spreadsheet tool, including unmerged cells, problems with the 'Inputs & Calcs' tab when used for multiple programs, limited drop-down options for delivery models, unfamiliar terminology, and rounding errors in the 'Summary & Decision' tab.
and their suggestions for improving their collaboration with the BDMs. The interview guide we used for our discussions with other key ENS staff is presented in Appendix B. 2.3. Consultant Interviews To inform our understanding of BDMs’ rol...
AI summary The document discusses interviews conducted with Retrofit service consultants to understand the role of BDMs in supporting energy efficiency projects in the BNI sector. An interview guide used with ENS staff is referenced in Appendix B, and a list of 27 eligible consultants was compiled for interviews.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 33 of 94 their efficiency efforts. The interview guide we used for our discussions with consultants is presented in Appendix C. 2.4. Participant Interviews To further enhance our understanding of BDMs’ role...
AI summary The document discusses participant interviews conducted to understand the role of BDMs in BNI energy-efficiency projects, including interviews with Retrofit service participants and BER program component participants.
attempt 8 Total 12 To minimize the burden on Retrofit service participants, the BD evaluation team coordinated with the Research Into Action team conducting the Retrofit service process evaluation, and developed a single instrument coverin...
AI summary The BD evaluation team coordinated with the Research Into Action team to develop a single instrument for evaluating the Retrofit service process, which included questions similar to those in the BER participant guide. Both guides focused on the role of BDMs in promoting ENS programs and supporting energy-efficiency efforts.
ly for the BD evaluation. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 35 of 94 3. Findings This chapter is based upon the results of our interviews with BDMs, other key ENS staff, consultants, and participants in BNI progra...
AI summary The chapter evaluates the effectiveness of internal collaboration at ENS, particularly between BDMs and program staff. BDMs are instrumental in identifying appropriate energy-efficiency programs and connecting customers with ENS staff, facilitating the approval and implementation of energy-saving projects.
s agreed that projects in all program components often result from the consistent and ongoing communication that BDMs have with the BNI customers in their vertical markets. The vertical market each BDM serves, coupled with project and prog...
AI summary BDMs (Business Development Managers) play a key role in connecting BNI customers with program staff for Custom and BER projects. Their involvement varies depending on the program component and the level of participant engagement, with some businesses requiring more oversight than others.
is generally most appropriate for large facilities. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 36 of 94 On the other hand, in the case of national accounts, which are common in the retail, hospitality and tourism markets,...
AI summary The text discusses the role of Business Development Managers (BDMs) in promoting energy efficiency programs like the Building Efficiency Rebate (BER) for small businesses in the retail, hospitality, and tourism sectors. It also mentions the implementation of new software, ENS’s Dynamic DSM (DDSM), to improve project tracking and collaboration.
training session where BDMs walk ESAs through how they work with projects, and ESAs discuss calls they have received and talk about the best ways to serve those customers.
AI summary This text describes a training session where Business Development Managers (BDMs) guide Energy Service Advisors (ESAs) on how to work with projects, and ESAs share insights on customer calls and best practices for serving customers.
OEMs. BDMs play a major role in placing OEMs at client organization sites, including working with senior management on OEM agreements. The BDMs also maintain regular contact with the client sponsor and site energy team to ensure there is a...
AI summary BDMs (Business Development Managers) play a key role in placing OEMs (Organizational Energy Managers) at client sites, working closely with senior management and site energy teams. BDMs maintain limited direct contact with OEMs, but OEMs provide valuable insights and help drive deeper energy savings and client satisfaction.
experience with ENS. One of these two participants reported they would like to have regular contact with someone like a BDM to help their organization identify additional projects. All 13 of the participants who recalled working with a BDM...
AI summary Participants who worked with BDMs reported high satisfaction with their services, citing timeliness and helpfulness. Regular interactions included updates on program changes and discussions about upcoming energy-saving projects. Most participants plan to complete additional ENS projects in the future, while one noted their facility's needs were already met.
an interest in future projects stated that they had a small facility and their recent completed Retrofit service project addressed their one major energy using piece of equipment. As further evidence that ENS is responding to the market, C...
AI summary The document discusses ENS's efforts to expand its Custom program component by targeting specific market niches and developing specialists in areas like refrigeration and industrial applications. It also highlights the need for better participation pathways for businesses that are too large for SBES but too small for Custom programs due to the cost of feasibility studies.
Ensure participant satisfaction with the program. BDMs work to ensure consultants understand program component expectations, especially around the feasibility studies and the M&V reports. BDMs communicate with consultants to ensure the c...
AI summary BDMs ensure participant satisfaction by guiding consultants through program processes and resolving client issues. They also aim to build relationships with consultants to promote ENS programs and recruit more contractors to the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN), though consultants show limited interest in joining ETN due to lack of awareness and need for better education and training.
ons ENS can offer to meet the customer’s previously unrecognized needs. Insight Selling may include energy management as well as other benefits, thereby helping the customer bring their business to the next level. Promoting NEBs. One BDM...
AI summary The document discusses how ENS's Business Development Managers (BDMs) promote non-energy benefits (NEBs) such as productivity and health and safety, and how the BD team collaborates with internal and external stakeholders to drive BNI customers toward energy efficiency projects.
effectiveness of internal collaboration, outreach, and the salesforce process. Notably, some of the conclusions and recommendations pertain to more than one research topic. 4.1. Internal Collaboration Conclusion 1: Collaboration between BD...
AI summary The document highlights the effectiveness of internal collaboration at ENS, particularly between BDMs, program staff, marketing staff, and ESAs. It notes that teams work together to resolve issues and recommends establishing regular meetings between the BD team and marketing staff to further enhance collaboration and share resources.
ols after it reorganized to better serve these markets. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 45 of 94 Recommendation 2-1: BDMs should continue to assess their outreach efforts and work with the marketing team to incr...
AI summary The document recommends that BDMs continue to assess outreach efforts and collaborate with the marketing team to better serve underserved markets, particularly businesses that fall between the SBES and Retrofit programs. It also highlights the potential benefits of the ETN for BNI consultants and the need for ENS to dedicate staff to these segments.
n and understood by BNI consultants. BDMs can benefit from a larger pool of high-quality partners who help promote ENS’s program components and collaborate on energy-efficiency projects. Recommendation 3-1: The BD team should use any marke...
AI summary The BD team collaborates with consultants to improve energy-efficiency programs and training strategies. The implementation of the new DDSM system in 2018 is expected to enhance project tracking and BDM outreach.
r for you to reach and convince customers to do efficient projects? Is there anything you could do to provide additional support to the marketing team?] Q11. How do you collaborate with Energy Solutions Advisors, or ESAs? [Probes: How you...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding collaboration between different teams and roles within the energy efficiency programs, including Energy Solutions Advisors (ESAs), Onsite Energy Managers (OEMs), and Business Development Managers (BDMs). It explores how information is shared and how collaboration could be improved.
ice providers, consultants, and specialists. Q15. Please describe how you work with consultants/service providers/specialists on projects. [If not addressed in Q15:] a. How often do service providers/consultants/specialists come to you wit...
AI summary The document asks about collaboration with consultants, service providers, and specialists on projects, including frequency of communication, customer segments involved, roles and responsibilities, and methods of follow-up. It also inquires about differences in working with Efficiency Trade Network (ETN) partners versus non-ETN partners.
: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 51 of 94 Appendix B. ENS Staff In-Depth Interview Guide B.1. Introduction Thanks for taking the time to talk today. I work for Research Into Action and we have been asked by Efficiency Nova...
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide used by Research Into Action for evaluating the Business Development team’s practices at Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). It includes introductory remarks and questions about roles, responsibilities, and collaboration with Business Development Managers (BDMs).
hink of any measurements or stories that show some of the team’s successes? Q23. What key challenges do you think the BD team faces in the next year or two? Q24. Is there anything else about the BD team’s work that we have not discussed th...
AI summary The text outlines an interview guide for a process evaluation of the Custom Retrofit program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It includes questions for participants about the program's successes, challenges, and additional insights.
3) What problems or issues, if any, have your customers faced? 4) What has worked well for your customers? Q16. How about the M&V phase? 1) What problems or issues, if any, have you faced with M&V procedures? 2) What has worked well for yo...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to customer experiences with energy efficiency programs, including challenges faced, successes, and satisfaction with M&V tools. It also explores reasons for project abandonment and strategies to encourage project completion, as well as the role of ENS and BDMs in supporting customers.
be improved? Q25. What additional services or support, if any, would you like to see from Efficiency Nova Scotia to help you complete more Custom projects? Q26. Are there any additional measures that ENS should make eligible for Custom pro...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions aimed at gathering feedback on the Custom-Retrofit program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on participant satisfaction, challenges, and opportunities for improvement in service and support.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 58 of 94 Appendix D. Retrofit Service Participant Interview Guide D.1. Introduction Thanks for taking the time to talk today. I work for Research Into Action, part of the Econoler evaluation team, and we ha...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Custom Retrofit program. It outlines the introduction and initial questions related to roles and responsibilities of participants in the program.
ch phase was that and why was their more interactions? Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 60 of 94 Q14. Was there any service or support you would have liked to see from your consultant that you did not receive? Wh...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions related to customer satisfaction with energy efficiency consulting services, including support received, communication with Efficiency Nova Scotia, and collaboration with Business Development Managers. The questions focus on service quality, additional recommendations, and program participation.
nd helps the client navigate the process with ENS programs, services and rebates] Q19. [IF they work with BDMS] What do you typically work on with the BDMs? Q20. [IF they work with BDMS] Do you ever work with BDMs and consultant to discuss...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at assessing customer experiences with Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, services, and support, particularly in relation to interactions with Business Development Managers (BDMs) and the level of satisfaction with the services provided.
port you needed to complete your Custom project? Why? Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 61 of 94 D.7. Opportunities, Successes, and Challenges Q27. Do you have any plans to do additional Custom program projects in...
AI summary The text includes questions about future Custom program projects, challenges and successes of participation in the Custom-Retrofit program, and suggestions for improving the program's effectiveness. It also references an appendix related to Business Energy Rebates.
evelopment Manager (BDM) do to make the BER program more effective? Q25. Is there anything that we haven’t already discussed that you would like to mention? Thank you very much for your time. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attac...
AI summary The text includes a series of questions and a thank you statement, followed by the date and page number of a document. It also references a final report on training and development practices prepared for Efficiency Nova Scotia by Research Into Action, Inc. and Corporate Research Associates, Inc.
ch 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 67 of 94 1. Introduction 1.1. Training and Development Overview Based upon Research Into Action’s review of Training and Development (T&D) materials and conversations with Human Resources (HR) s...
AI summary This section discusses Efficiency Nova Scotia's approach to training and development, emphasizing a culture of high performance and engagement. Employees participate in both technical and broader enrichment opportunities, supported by an annual T&D budget.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 71 of 94 The document we used to guide our discussions with other organizations about T&D best practices is presented in Appendix B. 2.2. ENS Staff Interviews Research Into Action interviewed ENS employees...
AI summary The document discusses NS Power's use of Appendix B to guide discussions on T&D best practices and outlines the methodology used by Research Into Action to interview ENS employees, focusing on current practices, opportunities for improvement, and ensuring the sample reflects the workforce demographics.
NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 89 of 94 Appendix B. Other Organization Interview Guide B.1. Introduction Thanks for taking the time to talk today. I work for Research Into Action in Portland, Oregon. On behalf of our client, Efficiency N...
AI summary This text outlines an interview guide for organizations recognized for providing cutting-edge training and development opportunities to their employees. The interview is conducted on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) to gather insights into best practices for training and development.
ate Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 3 Page 92 of 94 Appendix C. ENS Staff Interview Guide C.1. Introduction Thanks for taking the time to talk today. I work for Research Into Action and we have been asked by Efficiency Nova...
AI summary This text outlines an interview guide used by Research Into Action for evaluating Efficiency Nova Scotia's training and development practices. The guide includes an introduction and a section on roles and responsibilities, with an initial question directed at staff members.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-21: 2 3 Reference: Appe...
AI summary The document contains a series of detailed requests for information related to the costs and breakdowns of energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the 'Appliance Retirement' and 'Instant Savings' components of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program for the years 2020-2022, as well as geographical and product-type breakdowns.
incentives provided by energy efficiency product type. 25 26 (g) Are the enhancements to the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program 27 accounted for in the Alternate Scenario? Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-21 Page 1 of...
AI summary The text discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program and its enhancements in the context of a supply agreement application for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. The document refers to a specific proceeding (M09096) and includes a response from E1 to NS Power.
. Costs include both direct incentives (cheques to participants) and the cost to remove and replace appliances 3 4 g) Yes, enhancements have been included in the Alternate Scenario. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-21 Page 3 of...
AI summary The document discusses the costs associated with EfficiencyOne's program, including direct incentives and appliance replacement. It references an application by E1 for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. for efficiency and conservation activities from 2020 to 2022, under matter number M09096.
vely. Estimates of participant counts were required for the Rate and Bill 22 Impact Analysis, and those values and their derivation are provided in EfficiencyOne’s response 23 to NS Power IR-64 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-2...
AI summary The document outlines a request for expenditure, energy savings, and quantifiable benefits for various enabling strategies in the 2020-2022 DSM Plan. EfficiencyOne is required to provide data for Education and Outreach, Development and Research, and other strategies like the Efficiency Trade Network, Codes & Standards, and Regulatory Affairs.
• Regulatory Affairs. 21 22 Response IR-26: 23 24 a) Table 1 below provides level of expenditure by year (2016, 2017, 2018) for each category 25 of Enabling Strategies. 26 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-26 Page 1 of 6 Efficien...
AI summary The document provides a table showing expenditures by year (2016, 2017, 2018) for Enabling Strategies categories, including Development and Research, Education and Outreach, and other categories like Regulatory Affairs and Codes and Standards. Total expenditures for Enabling Strategies are also listed for each year.
er 950 910 1,087 2 Total Enabling Strategies 3,049 2,765 3,272 3 4 b) Although there are no energy and demand savings attributable to the Enabling Strategies 5 during the 2016-2018 period that count towards the achievement of EfficiencyOne...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of Enabling Strategies in the DSM Plan, even though they did not contribute to energy and demand savings during 2016-2018. Education and Outreach efforts maintained public awareness and improved public opinion of Efficiency Nova Scotia during that period.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL • 36 workshops and • 37 workshops and energy management energy management plans delivered to plans delivered to non-profit non-profit organizations organizations 1 2 Efficiency Trade Network 3 EfficiencyOne supports growth...
AI summary EfficiencyOne supports Nova Scotia’s energy efficiency industry through the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN), which helps increase participation in programs by connecting residents with skilled professionals. Membership in the ETN grew significantly from 2016 to 2018, and training and networking events increased substantially during this period. A 2018 survey highlighted benefits such as gaining new customers and industry networking.
• Small Business Energy Study; 20 • Residential Socket Study; 21 • DSM data tracking system implementation; 22 • electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM) development; 23 • tracking quality assurance and participant satisfaction; 24 • t...
AI summary The document outlines various studies and initiatives related to energy efficiency, including a Small Business Energy Study, Residential Socket Study, and the implementation of a DSM data tracking system. It also mentions the development of an electronic Technical Reference Manual (eTRM) and efforts to track participant satisfaction and attitudinal metrics among Nova Scotian households.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 • a review of the economic impact of the energy efficiency industry in Nova Scotia; and 2 • receipt, analysis and utilization of NS Power customer usage data to aid in program- 3 specific marketing campaigns and promotio...
AI summary EfficiencyOne collaborates with governments to advance energy efficiency standards and regulations in Nova Scotia. It participated in various committees and working groups to support the development of national and regional energy efficiency standards, including the National Energy Code for Buildings and the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-27: 2 3 Reference: Appe...
AI summary The document addresses a request regarding EfficiencyOne's controls and policies to prevent subsidizing its affiliate's unregulated activities through Enabling Strategies. EfficiencyOne refers to the Inter-Affiliate Code of Conduct approved by the NSUARB in 2017, which mandates annual compliance reporting and record-keeping to ensure no cross-subsidization occurs.
work on Clean Growth and Climate Change, Energy and Mines Ministers’ Conference, St. Andrews by-the-Sea, NB, August 2017, ISBN 978-0- 660-08766-5, at page 8. 2 Ibid, at page 10 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-28 Page 1 of 4 Eff...
AI summary The document references a Clean Growth and Climate Change conference and includes a filing by EfficiencyOne related to a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the period 2020-2022.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 The second is the continued advanc...
AI summary The document discusses the advancement of Canada’s Energy Efficiency Regulations through amendments, including Amendment 14, 15, and 16, and outlines the process of pre-publishing and commenting on these amendments. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has announced plans to update regulations for various products, as detailed in attached tables.
gement and comment, as opposed to “publication” which serves the purpose of announcing a new or amended regulation becoming effective (pending any enforcement delay as indicated by NRCan). Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-28 Pag...
AI summary The text discusses the distinction between 'publication' and 'notice and comment' in regulatory processes, and includes a table of residential and commercial product categories under efficiency regulations. It references a proceeding involving EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc.
CSA C36013, Table 9, for clothes washer function CSA C36116 or 10 C.F.R. Appendix D2 for clothes dryer function CSA C36116, Table 1, for clothes dryer function 4 CSA C36013 for clothes washer function CSA C36013, Table 10, for clothes...
AI summary The text outlines regulatory amendments to energy efficiency standards for various appliances, including clothes washers, clothes dryers, and dishwashers, referencing specific Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards and U.S. Federal Regulations.
Efficiency Standard 1 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW and CSA C74698 Energy On or after December 31, < 40 kW and either without a heating section or with an electric efficiency 1998 and before January 1, hea...
AI summary The document outlines efficiency standards for large air conditioners with cooling capacities between 19 kW and 40 kW, specifying different energy efficiency ratios (EER and IEER) and applicable standards (CSA C746-98, CSA C746-06, CSA C746-17, and AHRI 340/360) based on the date of compliance.
AHRI 340/360 for IEER ≥ 11.2 IEER 6 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW and CSA C74617 Energy On or after January 1, 2018 < 70 kW and either without a heating section or with an electric efficiency heating secti...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners based on cooling capacity and heating sections, referencing specific standards like CSA C746-17 and AHRI 340/360, with minimum energy efficiency ratios (IEER) varying by category and effective dates.
AHRI 340/360 for IEER ≥ 11.7 IEER 3 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW and < CSA C74617 Energy On or after January 1, 2018 40 kW and either without a heating section or with an electric heating efficiency secti...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency requirements for large air conditioners based on cooling capacity, specifying minimum energy efficiency ratios (IEER) and applicable standards such as CSA C746-17, CSA C746-98, and CSA C746-06, along with effective dates for compliance.
AHRI 340/360 for IEER ≥ 11.2 IEER 6 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW and < CSA C74617 Energy On or after January 1, 2018 70 kW and either without a heating section or with an electric heating efficiency secti...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners based on cooling capacity and heating section type, referencing specific standards and efficiency ratios from CSA and AHRI.
AHRI 340/360 for IEER ≥ 11.5 IEER 9 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW and CSA C74617 Energy On or after January 1, 2018 < 40 kW and a heating section other than an electric heating section efficiency ratio ≥ 1...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency requirements for large air conditioners with different cooling capacities, referencing specific standards and dates. It includes regulations from the Canadian Standards Association and the Canada Gazette.
AHRI 340/360 for IEER ≥ 11.1 IEER 14 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 70 kW and < CSA C74617 Energy On or after January 1, 2018 223 kW and either without a heating section or with an electric efficiency heating sec...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency requirements for large air conditioners with specific cooling capacities, referencing standards such as AHRI 340/360 and CSA C746-17, and sets minimum energy efficiency ratios (IEER) for different periods and configurations.
IEER 3 CSA C74617 On or after January 1, 2018 http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/html/sordors201eng.html 10/80 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152,...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for large air conditioners, specifying cooling capacities and energy efficiency ratios based on different standards and effective dates.
energy efficiency efficiency and before January 1, 2018 heating section or with an electric heating section ratio ratio ≥ 11.0 AHRI 340/360 for IEER ≥ 11.2 IEER 6 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW and < CSA C74...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency requirements for large air conditioners based on their cooling capacity and heating sections, referencing various standards such as CSA C746-17, CSA C746-98, and AHRI 340/360, with specific efficiency ratios and dates for compliance.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152, Number 22: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 70 kW and < Energy 223...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency regulations for large air conditioners with specific cooling capacities and heating sections, referencing standards such as CSA C746-06, CSA C746-17, and AHRI 340/360, with different efficiency requirements based on the date of application.
h −8.3°C inlet air IEER ≥ 11.6 7 Large heat pumps that have a CSA C74606 for energy Energy efficiency ratio ≥ 9.5 On or after January 1, cooling capacity of ≥ 70 kW efficiency ratio and heating 2010 and before Heating coefficient of perfo...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency requirements for large heat pumps, specifying minimum energy efficiency ratios and performance standards based on inlet air temperatures and compliance dates.
th −8.3°C inlet air IEER ≥ 12.0 4 Large heat pumps that have a CSA C74698 Energy efficiency ratio ≥ 9.1 On or after cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW December 31, 1998 and Heating coefficient of performance and < 70 kW before January 1, 2010 ≥...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency requirements for large heat pumps with cooling capacities between 40 kW and 70 kW, specifying minimum energy efficiency ratios and heating coefficients of performance under different inlet air temperatures and applicable standards.
FER ≤ FER for product class "NonWeatherized, NonCondensing Oil 10 C.F.R. Appendix AA, Furnace Fan (NWONC)", set out in 10 C.F.R. §430.32(y) for FER Information 264 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the information set out i...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for collecting and reporting specific information related to oil-fired furnaces, including input rates and efficiency metrics, in accordance with the CSA standards and as mandated by the Act.
(b) annual fuel utilization efficiency. 3 Oilfired furnaces that are manufactured on or after CSA P.2, for information set out in (a) input rate, in kW (Btu/h); July 3, 2019 paragraphs (a) and (b) (b) annual fuel utilization 10 C.F.R. App...
AI summary This text outlines the requirements for oil-fired furnaces manufactured on or after July 3, 2019, referencing specific standards and regulations, including CSA P.2, 10 C.F.R. Appendix AA, and the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016.
a certification body has verified that the product is in compliance with the energy efficiency standard set out in any of paragraphs 3(a), 4(a), 5(a) and 6(a) of the table to section 376; and (h) its uniform energy factor and Vs, if a cert...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for products, specifying compliance requirements based on manufacturing dates and certification by a certification body. It references specific sections of the Energy Efficiency Regulations and standards set by the Canadian Standards Association (CSA).
of ≥ 0.5330 – 0.00042 Vs. 5 Oilfired water heaters that have a firsthour rating of CSA B21100 for Must have at least On or after January 1, 2018 ≥ 193 L (51 US gallons) but < 284 L (75 US gallons) energy one of the following: factor (a)...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for oil-fired water heaters, specifying minimum energy factor requirements based on first-hour ratings and applicable standards such as CSA B211-00 and CSA P.3-15. These regulations came into effect on January 1, 2018.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 23 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152, Number 22: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 6 Oilfired water heaters that have a firsthour rating of CSA B21100 for Must...
AI summary The document outlines regulatory amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifying requirements for oil-fired water heaters, including energy factor standards and information that must be provided to the Minister.
212 means the CSA standard CAN/CSAC86212 entitled Performance of incandescent reflector lamps. (CSA C862 12) 44 (1) The definition CSA C81995 in section 445 of the Regulations is repealed. (2) The definition CSA C81911 in section 445...
AI summary The text amends the Energy Efficiency Regulations by updating references to CSA standards for incandescent and fluorescent lamps, including performance criteria and measurement methods.
On or after December 31, 1996 and before January 26, 2018 2 CSA C81916 or 10 CSA C81916, Table 1 or average lamp efficacy × 1.011 > minimum On or after January 26, 2018 C.F.R. Appendix R average lamp efficacy for the product in 10 C.F.R....
AI summary The text outlines amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifying updated standards for lamp efficacy measurements, including CSA C819-16 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix R, effective from January 26, 2018, and references related CSA standards such as CSA C654-10 and CSA C654-14.
AC65414 entitled Fluorescent lamp ballast efficacy measurements. (CSA C65414) fluorescent lamp ballast means a ballast that is (a) designed to start and operate fluorescent lamps by (i) providing the necessary voltage and current, (ii)...
AI summary The text defines terms related to fluorescent lamp ballasts, including their design, functionality, and exclusion criteria, referencing standards such as CSA C654-14 and 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B). It outlines specific classifications such as high-frequency and low-frequency ballasts and excludes certain types based on design and use.
itry in a ceiling fan light kit that is not replaceable by a consumer and that is used to connect the light kit’s solidstate lighting components. (circuits intégrés d’éclairage à semiconducteurs) 10 C.F.R. §430.23(x)(2) means paragraph 4...
AI summary The document outlines regulatory changes to energy efficiency standards for ceiling fan light kits, referencing specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations and updating requirements for manufacturing dates and power limits.
ic signal indicator that has a nominal diameter of 200 mm (8 inches) 4 Traffic signal modules that have a green traffic signal indicator that has a nominal diameter of 300 mm (12 inches) http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/html/s...
AI summary This text discusses amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, including the replacement of definitions for CSA C62301 and standby mode in multiple sections. It references the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and provides updated definitions related to energy efficiency standards for household appliances.
connected to mains power, (a) is not producing video or audio output signals, providing any mechanical function or exchanging data with, or receiving it from, an external source; and (b) can be switched into another mode with a remote cont...
AI summary The text revises definitions related to standby mode and external power supply in regulations, specifying conditions under which devices are considered to be in standby mode and clarifying the scope of external power supplies, excluding certain types of devices.
an accessory to a medical device; or (e) a device that is solely designed to power solidstate lighting or a ceiling fan that has a direct current motor. (bloc d’alimentation externe) replacement external power supply means an external pow...
AI summary The text defines various types of external power supplies under the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, including adaptive, direct operation, indirect operation, and replacement external power supplies, with specific references to standards such as CSA C381.1-17.
output current of less than 1 000 mA and that charges the battery of an enduse product that is fully or primarily motoroperated; and (b) for the purpose of section 588 if (i) it was manufactured before July 1, 2010, (ii) it was manufactu...
AI summary The text outlines updated energy efficiency standards for external power supplies, including specific criteria based on manufacturing dates and output specifications, and replaces sections 588 and 589 of the Regulations with new energy efficiency standards and testing procedures.
ard when tested in accordance with testing procedures established by the standard set out in column 2 that are applicable to an external power supply as defined in subsection 586(1). TABLE http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/html...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for external power supplies, referencing specific Canadian and U.S. regulations and standards, including CSA C381.1, 10 C.F.R. §430.32(w)(1)(i), and Appendix Z. It specifies efficiency requirements for active and no-load modes and sets periods of manufacture for compliance.
, supplies other than replacement 17 or 10 C.F.R. and power in noload mode 2017 external power supplies Appendix Z 3 Indirect operation external power CSA C381.1 or 10 C.F.R. §430.32(w)(1)(i) for efficiency in active mode On or after July...
AI summary The text outlines regulations for external power supplies, including efficiency standards in active and no-load modes, applicable standards such as CSA C381.1 and 10 C.F.R., and compliance dates. It also specifies the information required for external power supplies under the Act.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 39 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152, Number 22: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 CSA C657, Test CSA C657, Table Procedure B 6 Information 642 For the purpose of...
AI summary This document outlines the requirements for collecting and providing specific information related to commercial refrigerator-freezers under the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016. The information must be collected according to CSA C657, Test Procedure A, and includes details such as daily energy consumption and average temperatures.
dédié monobloc) structural panel means a walkin panel that is installed, or is designed to be installed, as the ceiling or a wall of a walkin cooler or walkin freezer. (panneau de structure) 10 C.F.R. Appendix A means Appendix A to Subp...
AI summary The text defines technical terms related to walk-in coolers and freezers, including structural panels, testing methods, and regulatory references such as 10 C.F.R. Appendices and sections. These definitions are part of a regulatory framework for energy consumption and efficiency standards.
ly Edaily ≤ 1.2917 × And + 5.6 (0.12 × And+ 5.6) 10 C.F.R. Appendix B for Rvalue Rvalue ≥ 5.64 K · m2/W (32 ft2·°F·h/Btu) 5 Passage door assemblies for walkin coolers 10 C.F.R. Appendix A for Edaily Edaily ≤ 0.5382 × And + 1.7 (0.05 × A...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for walk-in door assemblies, specifying requirements for Edaily and R-value based on door type and usage (cooler or freezer). It references 10 C.F.R. Appendix A and B for these standards and includes information to be collected and provided to the Minister.
15.0 97.70 2 25.0 98.00 3 37.5 98.20 4 50.0 98.30 5 75.0 98.50 6 100.0 98.60 7 167.0 98.70 8 250.0 98.80 9 333.0 98.90 TABLE 2 Column 1 Column 2 % Efficiency When Tested at 50% of Nominal Load Item kVA Rating 2045 kV BIL > 4595 kV BIL >...
AI summary The text presents efficiency percentages for different kVA ratings under various voltage levels, indicating performance metrics for electrical equipment. It also includes a reference to a Canadian Gazette regulation related to energy efficiency standards.
that are set out in relation to the product’s BIL rating set out in column 2 of Table 2 to this section apply to drytype transformers that have a kVA rating set out in column 1. Interpolation (3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for dry-type transformers based on their kVA ratings, including interpolation rules for ratings between listed values and a reduced standard for transformers with specific configurations. Testing procedures are referenced from 10 C.F.R. Appendix A.
75.0 98.60 5 112.5 98.74 6 150.0 98.83 7 225.0 98.94 http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/html/sordors201eng.html 47/80 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 48 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volum...
AI summary The text presents tables with data on efficiency percentages for different kVA ratings and voltage levels, likely related to electrical equipment testing standards. It includes references to regulatory amendments and a Canadian Gazette link.
ed motor; (n) an inverteronly motor; or (o) a motor that is designed to operate continuously only while immersed. (moteur électrique) explosionproof motor means an electric motor (a) in respect of which measures have been taken to preven...
AI summary The text defines technical terms related to electric motors, including explosion-proof motors, footless motors, and references to international standards such as IEC 60034-5, IEC 60529, and IEEE 112-2004. These definitions and standards are part of regulations amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016.
yphase Induction Motors and Generators. (IEEE 1122004) integral gear assembly means a product that consists of an electric motor and a gear mechanism that are combined in such a manner that (a) the end bracket or mounting flange forms an...
AI summary The text defines technical terms related to electric motors and generators, including integral gear assembly and IP code, and classifies electric motors as energy-using products under specific regulations, with exceptions outlined in sections 4, 5, 751, and 752.
2004 Information 752 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the following information must be provided to the Minister in respect of an electric motor: http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/html/sordors201eng.html 51/80 D...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for providing information on electric motors under subsection 5(1) of the Act, including details like nominal output power, number of poles, and construction type. It also references standards such as CSA C390-10, NEMA, and IEC for collecting specific motor information.
C74709 or IEEE 1142010. Information 756 (1) For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the following information must be provided to the Minister in respect of a small electric motor: (a) its average full load efficiency; (b) its typ...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for providing specific information about small electric motors, including efficiency, type, and output power, and specifies the standards for collecting this information, such as CSA C747-09 and IEEE 112-2004.
ese commitments will provide benefits to Canadians through energy cost savings and improved environmental outcomes, which lead to increased productivity, competitiveness and energy affordability. In December 2016, First Ministers adopted t...
AI summary The text outlines international and national commitments to energy efficiency and climate change mitigation, including the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, and efforts to align energy efficiency standards between Canada and the United States. These initiatives aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy affordability, and support economic growth.
re than recovered through energy savings. The analysis found payback ranges of less than eight years for all product categories, with nine product categories having paybacks of two years or less. The Amendment is estimated to result in an...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1.54 Mt annually in 2030 and improve energy efficiency, leading to cost savings and increased productivity. It is classified as an 'OUT' under the 'One-for-One' Rule, resulting in a net reduction in administrative costs for businesses, including small businesses.
ness importers of affected products. However, the impact on these small businesses is a net reduction in administrative costs resulting from the elimination of import reporting requirements. Domestic and international coordination and coop...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of regulatory amendments to Canada's Energy Efficiency Act, emphasizing reduced administrative costs for small businesses and alignment of federal and provincial regulations. It highlights the elimination of import reporting requirements and the reduction of regulatory differences between Canada and the United States.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 57 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152, Number 22: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 Since most energyusing products must cross provincial or international borders...
AI summary The text discusses the role of Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) and labelling programs in improving energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions in Canada. These tools remove inefficient products from the market and encourage innovation, making higher efficiency products more accessible to consumers and businesses.
xisting buildings, as well as fuel switching; (3) supporting building codes and energyefficient housing in Indigenous communities; and (4) improving energy efficiency for appliances and equipment. In June 2018, the Generation Energy Counc...
AI summary The text discusses the role of energy efficiency in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emphasizing its potential to contribute significantly to Canada's emission reduction targets. It highlights the economic benefits of energy efficiency, such as increased GDP and job growth, and notes the importance of the building sector in GHG emissions.
pment that combusts fuel to generate heat leads to direct carbon dioxide emissions at the site, while equipment that consumes electricity contributes to GHG emissions at the point of generation. GHG emissions from Canadian homes declined b...
AI summary The text discusses GHG emissions from residential and commercial buildings in Canada, noting a decline in residential emissions and an increase in commercial emissions. It highlights market barriers to energy efficiency, such as lack of consumer awareness, organizational capacity, and split incentives.
nergy use, a lack of capacity within organizations to understand and manage energy use, and split incentives (e.g. landlords may not purchase efficient equipment if tenants pay the energy bill). In 2011, the Canada–United States Regulatory...
AI summary The text discusses the need for regulatory action to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions by aligning Canadian energy efficiency standards with those of the U.S., addressing unnecessary regulatory differences, and reducing the load on the electricity system. It highlights challenges such as split incentives and the limitations of voluntary measures.
latory differences between Canadian and U.S. regulations across new and existing product categories to support crossborder trade. The desired outcomes of the Amendment are as follows: GHG emissions are reduced, contributing to Canada’s go...
AI summary The Amendment aims to reduce GHG emissions, lower electricity demand, and save consumers and businesses money by introducing MEPS and labelling requirements for new and existing product categories, while also reducing trade obstacles through harmonized test procedures and reporting requirements.
dicated condensing) manufactured on or after January 1, 2020, the Amendment will align the MEPS and test procedures with those that will be applied in the United States on that same date. (B) Introduce more stringent MEPS for currently reg...
AI summary The document discusses amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, focusing on aligning Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for ceiling fan light kits and commercial refrigeration equipment with U.S. standards. The changes aim to improve energy efficiency by reducing maximum power consumption and introducing more stringent requirements.
s manufactured on or after January 1, 2018, the Amendment will align Canada’s MEPS and test procedures with those applied in the United States since 2013 and 2014 respectively. Large heat pumps Large heat pumps are used in commercial and i...
AI summary The document discusses amendments to Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) in Canada, aligning them with U.S. standards for various heating and cooling equipment, including large heat pumps, packaged terminal air conditioners, and oil-fired furnaces, with specific dates for implementation.
ovide connectivity to a network. Definitions have been clarified to ensure that power consumption while data is being exchanged (i.e. when connected to a network) is not covered by the Regulations. Gasfired storage water heaters and oilf...
AI summary The text discusses amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, focusing on gas-fired and oil-fired water heaters and general service incandescent reflector lamps. It introduces a new Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) test procedure and aligns Canada's exclusions with the United States.
rican National Standards Institute or Illumination Engineering Society). (D) Provide flexibility for testing requirements and remove import reporting requirements for certain product categories Mathematical model Canada’s energy efficiency...
AI summary The text discusses amendments to Canada's energy efficiency compliance regime, allowing greater flexibility for certification bodies to use mathematical models for verifying product energy performance. This change aligns with U.S. regulatory practices and removes import reporting requirements for certain product categories.
ation bodies will continue to be responsible for the integrity of their verification mark and its use. This provision comes into force upon publication. Import reporting — Incorporated products The Amendment will provide a limited exceptio...
AI summary The document discusses amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, which include changes to import reporting requirements for certain energy-using products incorporated in other products, and the repeal of incorporation by reference. These changes come into effect upon publication.
arket. A regulatory approach will provide incremental benefits to the status quo approach, since it will ensure that all products imported or shipped interprovincially meet the more stringent MEPS. The status quo option would also maintain...
AI summary The document discusses the implications of maintaining the status quo versus adopting a regulatory approach for energy efficiency standards. It highlights that a regulatory approach would ensure consistency across markets and reduce GHG emissions, while the status quo maintains an uneven playing field. Repealing the regulations would eliminate compliance costs but not effectively address energy consumption or emissions.
ions and energy consumption to the extent that a regulatory approach would. It will also be a significant departure from Canada’s approach to advance energy efficiency and the intent of the Act. A voluntary approach would result in fewer G...
AI summary A voluntary approach to energy efficiency is argued to be less effective than regulatory measures, citing global examples where MEPS led to significant energy savings and GHG reductions. The text highlights that regulatory consistency with the U.S. would only create incremental costs if both countries enforce mandatory requirements, but currently, differences do not burden industry.
ted in Canada. In these cases, the regulatory regimes are different in each country, but do not create a burden for industry, since no energy efficiency requirements need to be satisfied in Canada. Regulatory action Taking regulatory actio...
AI summary Regulatory action to align MEPS for 17 product categories with the US will reduce compliance costs and unnecessary regulatory differences, leading to lower energy consumption and GHG emissions. This approach offers the largest emissions reductions among the options considered.
esult in significant net benefits over the lifetime of affected product models. The benefits vary by individual user depending on enduse sector, geographical location and operational practices. Annual reductions in energy consumption asso...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to result in significant energy consumption and GHG emission reductions over time, with estimated annual energy savings increasing from 3.76 PJ in 2020 to 15.76 PJ in 2030. It is projected to yield $4.55 billion in net benefits by 2030, with total benefits exceeding total costs by a ratio of almost five to one.
fits exceeding total costs by a ratio of almost five to one. By 2030, the present value of benefits and costs from the Amendment is estimated to be $5.75 billion and $1.20 billion, respectively. For all product categories affected by the A...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to generate significant energy savings and reduce GHG emissions, with benefits far exceeding costs. The analysis shows that energy savings over the product lifecycle will offset any increased retail prices, with payback periods of less than eight years for all product categories. The document provides a detailed cost-benefit analysis.
by comparing the following scenarios: the businessasusual case (i.e. excluding the Amendment); and the policy case (i.e. the businessasusual case including the Amendment). Businessasusual case The Canadian and U.S. markets for regula...
AI summary This analysis compares a business-as-usual scenario with a policy case that includes an amendment to the Regulations. It assumes that the Canadian and U.S. markets are integrated, and that regulatory changes in one country are analyzed independently, without considering spillover effects. The analysis uses 2016 market conditions as a baseline and acknowledges the difficulty in estimating cross-border market impacts.
essasusual case was defined in terms of Canadian market conditions assessed in 2016. This base case also includes an estimate of costs, if any, associated with unnecessary regulatory differences. Policy case The policy case is defined as...
AI summary The text outlines two cases—'essasusual' and 'policy'—in the context of energy efficiency regulations. The 'essasusual' case is based on 2016 Canadian market conditions, while the 'policy' case involves applying more stringent MEPS across 17 product categories. Benchmarks are used to represent inefficient products and assess regional energy savings.
ast efficient; and (2) the efficiency of the average unit impacted. Where relevant, regional sensitivities were evaluated (e.g. a heat pump would save more energy per year in a colder location). Social cost of carbon The social cost of car...
AI summary The text discusses evaluating energy efficiency improvements by considering both the efficiency of the product and regional factors, such as climate. It also explains the use of the social cost of carbon to estimate economic benefits from reducing GHG emissions and outlines a methodology to calculate incremental costs associated with meeting more stringent energy efficiency standards.
applicable. Total costs reported as being attributable to the Amendment include manufacturing, compliance and administrative costs as well as those incurred by Government to implement the changes. Methodology to estimate benefits Energy sa...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for estimating the benefits of an amendment, focusing on energy savings and cost calculations. Energy savings are calculated by comparing the energy use of benchmark product models with modified versions meeting stricter MEPS. These savings are monetized by multiplying by the cost of energy per unit saved.
ct categories to arrive at the estimate of total energy saved. This was then monetized by multiplying the results by the cost of energy per unit of energy saved (i.e. dollars per kilowatthour). The reductions in GHG emissions were calcula...
AI summary The text discusses methods for estimating energy savings and associated GHG emissions reductions. Energy savings are monetized based on energy cost, while GHG emissions are calculated using fuel-specific and average emission factors. Social cost of carbon is used to monetize GHG emissions. Key assumptions underpin these calculations.
arket; energy savings from the businessasusual case to the policy case; costs of moving from the businessasusual case to the policy case; product lifetime; and installation costs. Results http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/h...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology used to estimate the benefits and costs of an amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, applied across various product categories. The results show varying impacts based on the product category and the increase in stringency of the Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS).
$212 $212 Prerinse spray valves Tier II $0 $77 $77 Doors $150 $320 $169 Walkin coolers/freezers Systems $95 $1,194 $1,099 Total of all product categories $1,202 $5,747 $4,545 Costs for technology and installation. Benefits from energy sa...
AI summary The text presents a summary of costs and benefits related to energy efficiency regulations, including specific figures for pre-rinse spray valves, walk-in coolers/freezers, and other product categories. It highlights the financial impact of implementing these regulations, with costs and benefits calculated over time.
over period to 2030 2020 2030 By 2030 A. Quantified impacts ($) [millions in 2015 prices] Benefits Energy (gas and electricity) savings Canadians $511 $517 $4,849 $610 Avoided damages because of Canadians $90 $102 $899 $113 GHG reductions...
AI summary The text presents quantified impacts of energy efficiency measures from 2020 to 2030, showing total benefits and costs in both dollar and non-dollar terms, with net benefits estimated at $4,550 million by 2030.
3.76 15.76 121.23 — (petajoules) Positive impacts on Canadians GHG emission reductions 0.36 1.54 11.78 — (megatonnes) Note: Numbers may not add up to totals due to rounding. Sensitivity analysis As discussed above, the analysis assumed tha...
AI summary The analysis assumes that Canadian amendments to MEPS 22 have no spillover effects from the U.S., but sensitivity analysis shows that even with a 50% reduction in impacted product models, the total benefit to cost ratio remains about four to one, indicating significant net benefits.
to the other MEPS since they are already in effect in the United States. In those cases, the businessasusual case represents the Canadian market after it has been influenced by U.S. regulations. Table 4: Businessasusual case sensitivit...
AI summary The text discusses a sensitivity analysis of the business-as-usual case for energy efficiency regulations, showing the costs and benefits of reducing the number of product models impacted by the amendment. It references a table with figures in millions of dollars and notes that rounding may affect totals.
95 Total of all product categories $1,202 $994 $785 $5,747 $4,591 $3,435 $4,545 $3,597 $2,650 Note: Figures may not add up to totals due to rounding. Additional benefits and costs For industries using affected energyusing products in thei...
AI summary The text discusses the economic benefits of improved energy performance in industrial products, including cost savings, increased productivity, and job creation. It also highlights the impact of MEPS on preventing the import of low-efficiency products into Canada, reducing peak loads, and benefiting utilities.
any costs or benefits to the implementation of the MEPS for these three product categories, this Amendment will prevent future dumping of lowefficiency product models into the Canadian market. Another benefit of the Amendment is related t...
AI summary The Amendment to energy efficiency regulations introduces new product categories under MEPS, preventing low-efficiency products from entering the Canadian market. It also reduces administrative burden by removing reporting requirements for three existing products, resulting in net savings. The amendment is considered an 'OUT' under the 'One-for-One' Rule.
n “OUT” under the “OneforOne” Rule because it will decrease the administrative burden and result in net annualized savings of $543,896. Assumptions underlying administrative burden estimates Familiarization with the Amendment Familiariza...
AI summary The text discusses the administrative burden and cost savings associated with an amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016. It estimates a one-time cost of $543,896 for manufacturers to familiarize themselves with new reporting requirements, but highlights net annualized savings from reduced administrative burden.
unintentional omission of data. Consultation Natural Resources Canada has ongoing activities that provide numerous opportunities to gather feedback from stakeholders and to inform them: Energy Efficiency Regulations web page of the Natural...
AI summary Natural Resources Canada engages stakeholders through various consultation methods, including web pages, bilateral discussions, standards committees, market studies, and targeted emails, to inform and gather feedback on updates to energy efficiency regulations.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 1 Page 71 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152, Number 22: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 Consultation chronology Stakeholders 25 were informed of the changes being cons...
AI summary The document outlines the consultation process for the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, including stakeholder engagement since 2016 and key activities during the 75-day comment period following the prepublication in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 31, 2018.
t was prepublished in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on March 31, 2018. The following outlines the key consultation activities that Natural Resources Canada undertook during the 75day comment period: April 2018: An announcement was released...
AI summary Natural Resources Canada conducted several consultation activities during the 75-day comment period, including webinars, conference calls, and meetings with industry stakeholders to gather feedback on proposed regulatory text related to energy efficiency verification schemes and testing methods for various products.
uly 2018: A webinar was hosted to discuss comments received on drytype transformers with an industry association and their members. More than 20 stakeholders participated in discussions. Canada Gazette, Part I, consultation — 75day comme...
AI summary In July 2018, a webinar was held to discuss comments on dry-type transformers with industry stakeholders. Canada Gazette received 34 written submissions during a 75-day consultation period, with most requiring clarifications on manufacturing periods, test procedures, and import reporting. Six industry associations supported the Amendment, aligning with U.S. energy efficiency standards.
se spray valves, fluorescent lamp ballasts, packaged terminal air conditioners, oilfired furnaces, small electric motors or components of walkin coolers and walkin freezers. General comments Coming into force upon publication — water he...
AI summary The text discusses amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, including the removal of a six-month coming-into-force period for water heater provisions and the use of mathematical models for energy efficiency testing. Natural Resources Canada received industry support for these changes, which aim to provide manufacturers with more flexibility.
he verification of battery chargers. This scheme is both costeffective and supports the integrity of Natural Resources Canada’s energy efficiency compliance system. Productspecific comments Battery chargers Requests for replacement, servi...
AI summary The document discusses the verification of battery chargers under Natural Resources Canada’s energy efficiency regulations. It addresses industry feedback regarding the definition of battery chargers, including wireless and wet environment applications, and clarifies that the cost-benefit analysis is based on a 2016 market study using U.S. data.
Drytype transformers Two industry associations supported Canada’s intent to align regulations with the provinces and the United States, and one also requested that Natural Resources Canada not delay in publishing the Amendment. One manufa...
AI summary Industry associations and a manufacturer have raised concerns regarding the alignment of transformer regulations with provincial and U.S. standards, as well as the exclusion of certain transformers from testing standards. Natural Resources Canada acknowledges these concerns but will not make immediate changes due to insufficient information and potential misalignment risks.
Gasfired storage water heaters Stakeholders support the Amendment to allow testing and reporting of water heaters to the new UEF rating metric (see previous “Coming into force upon publication — water heaters, import reporting for incorpo...
AI summary Stakeholders support an amendment allowing testing and reporting of water heaters using the new UEF rating metric. Industry associations and manufacturers have requested guidance and clarification from Natural Resources Canada on various aspects of the amendment, including volume tolerance limits, metric conversions, and the accuracy of the UEF MEPS equation for larger models.
f performance (COP) values at 8.3 °C for large heat pumps, rather than at both 8.3 °C and −8.3 °C, as is currently required in Canada. Natural Resources Canada does not agree to remove the http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/html...
AI summary The document discusses a proposal to change the COP values for large heat pumps in Canada, with Natural Resources Canada opposing the removal of the −8.3 °C metric. Industry associations requested a suspension of labelling requirements for dedicated outdoor air systems, which was addressed with a clarification letter from Natural Resources Canada.
resulted from significant cooperation — both with the United States and domestically — to contribute to the achievement of domestic goals for the reduction of GHG emissions and energy consumption. In August 2014, Natural Resources Canada a...
AI summary The text discusses international cooperation between Canada and the U.S. to align energy efficiency standards and reduce GHG emissions. It highlights agreements from 2014 and 2016, including a framework for harmonizing regulations and reducing regulatory differences between Canada and the U.S.
n one or a few provinces. Rationale The Amendment will benefit Canadians by both reducing GHG emissions and removing unnecessary regulatory differences between Canada and the United States. According to the International Energy Agency, pol...
AI summary The Amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations aims to reduce GHG emissions and eliminate regulatory differences between Canada and the U.S. by implementing more stringent MEPS. This will lead to lower energy consumption, reduced emissions, and long-term cost savings for consumers despite higher initial purchase costs for low-efficiency products.
ysis has shown that the costs of technologies that will be required to bring lowefficiency products into compliance with the MEPS are outweighed by the benefits attributable to those technologies. The development of the Amendment was info...
AI summary The text discusses the benefits of aligning energy efficiency regulations with U.S. standards and highlights the historical development of the Energy Efficiency Regulations, including 13 amendments since 1995. It also outlines the implementation timeline and enforcement procedures for the Amendment.
lready in place for all products prescribed under the Regulations will continue to be used following the comingintoforce dates of this Amendment. The main features of this system are as follows. Verification marking and energy efficiency...
AI summary The document outlines the procedures for verifying energy efficiency of regulated products, including third-party verification, import reporting, and market surveys. Natural Resources Canada ensures compliance through energy efficiency reports, crosschecking data, and product testing.
productspecific compliance reporting, supported by thirdparty verification of energy efficiency performance, and ongoing collection of market data to assess broader trends affecting outcomes. Information collected on the energy efficienc...
AI summary The document outlines compliance measures for energy efficiency regulations, emphasizing third-party verification, market data collection, and collaboration with provinces to ensure adherence. It highlights the impact of product efficiency on GHG emissions and consumer savings, and mentions implementation under federal programs with reporting found in departmental plans and the Energy Efficiency Act.
ng programs: A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT, p. 3. 12 Ibid., p. 1 13 Ibid., p. 3 14 Calculated as the value of avoided damages from GHG emissions reductions. 15 For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that incremental costs for more efficient...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of avoided damages from GHG emissions reductions and references regulations related to energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. It outlines assumptions made regarding the passing on of incremental costs for more efficient technologies to consumers.
8/docs/themes/progressprogresen.html? utm_source=CanCa&utm_medium=Activities_e&utm_content=Progress&utm_campaign=CAbdgt18) Supporting Canada's researchers to build a more innovative economy http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p2/2018/20181031/h...
AI summary This document outlines the Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 152, Number 42, which includes regulations amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 (Amendment 15). The regulations are sponsored by the Department of Natural Resources and are based on the Energy Efficiency Act.
tatutory authority Energy Efficiency Act Sponsoring department Department of Natural Resources REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT (This statement is not part of the Regulations.) Executive summary Issues: Greenhouse gases are primary con...
AI summary The document outlines the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, particularly in the building sector. It references national policies such as the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change and highlights the need for improved energy efficiency standards to achieve Canada’s emissions reduction targets by 2030.
2030. The quantified costs include incremental technology costs to meet the more stringent standards, administrative costs and costs to Government associated with regulatory implementation. While not quantified as part of this analysis, en...
AI summary The text discusses the quantified costs of implementing more stringent energy efficiency standards, including technology, administrative, and regulatory costs. It also highlights economic and non-energy benefits, such as increased productivity and household comfort. The amendment is classified as an 'IN' under the 'One-for-One' Rule and impacts small Canadian manufacturers. The amendment resulted from domestic and international cooperation to meet GHG and energy consumption goals.
energy performance standards (MEPS) 1 for product labelling and for the promotion of energy efficiency and alternative energy use, including the collection of data and statistics on energy use. http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181...
AI summary The Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 were introduced to reduce GHG emissions by prescribing MEPS for energy-using products and requiring product labelling to promote energy efficiency. The regulations are regularly updated to include new products and revise existing requirements.
e and compare the energy use of a given product model relative to others in their category. They are regularly amended to introduce new energyusing products and to update existing requirements. Since most energyusing products must cross...
AI summary Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) and ENERGY STAR® labelling programs are key tools for improving energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions. MEPS remove inefficient products from the market, while ENERGY STAR labels help consumers identify efficient options. These programs drive innovation and are widely adopted globally.
costs. MEPS and labelling programs are among the most costeffective GHG reduction policies and are the cornerstone of energy efficiency and climate change programs in more than 80 countries. 2 Policy context Canada committed to reduce its...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of MEPS and labelling programs as cost-effective GHG reduction policies, supported by international adoption and Canada's commitment under the Paris Agreement. It outlines the Pan-Canadian Framework's approach to improving energy efficiency in buildings and appliances.
approach, the federal government committed to set new standards for heating equipment and other key technologies to the highest level of efficiency that is economically and technically achievable. This commitment builds on the August 2016...
AI summary The federal government committed to setting new energy efficiency standards for heating equipment and other technologies to the highest economically and technically achievable levels. This aligns with the Energy and Mines Ministers’ Conference and the Canadian Energy Strategy, aiming to reduce building sector energy consumption and GHG emissions. A 2018 report by the Generation Energy Council emphasized energy efficiency's role in meeting Canada's emission reduction targets.
. According to this report, fully onethird of Canada’s emission reduction target could be met through improvements in energy efficiency, which would also make Canadian businesses more competitive 4 http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/2...
AI summary This text discusses the potential of energy efficiency improvements to meet a third of Canada's emission reduction targets, boost business competitiveness, and increase GDP and job growth. It highlights the building sector's significant contribution to GHG emissions and the impact of energy-using equipment.
. Products that combust fuel to generate heat lead to direct carbon dioxide emissions at the site, while products that consume electricity contribute to GHG emissions at the point of generation. GHG emissions from Canadian homes declined b...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of residential and commercial building energy use on GHG emissions, highlighting a decline in residential emissions despite population growth and an increase in commercial building emissions despite expanded floor space. It emphasizes market failures in energy efficiency and the need for regulatory action to phase out inefficient products.
with other jurisdictions, where feasible and appropriate; and Reduce energy costs assumed by consumers and businesses. The desired outcomes of the Amendment are as follows: GHG emissions are reduced, contributing to Canada’s goal to reduce...
AI summary The document outlines the desired outcomes of an amendment to energy efficiency regulations, aiming to reduce GHG emissions, lower energy use in buildings, and help consumers and businesses save money through more efficient products. The amendment targets 17 product categories, with some addressed in a subsequent regulatory proposal.
ent would set the MEPS at levels that will apply on that same date in the United States. The existing testing standards are being updated but will remain aligned with those of the United States. (C) Introduce labelling and reporting requir...
AI summary The text discusses proposed amendments to energy efficiency standards for heat recovery ventilators and energy-recovery ventilators, aligning with U.S. standards. It highlights the importance of reducing GHG emissions from buildings and the potential benefits of updating regulations to achieve energy efficiency goals.
f these goals. It would also lead to missed opportunities to reduce energy consumption, leaving consumers and businesses with higher energy costs for heating associated with the building sector. The status quo option would not deliver on t...
AI summary The status quo and voluntary approach options fail to meet federal and provincial goals for energy efficiency, including the 2025 target for heating equipment. The status quo does not align with the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, while the voluntary approach would not sufficiently reduce GHG emissions or energy consumption.
tion to the extent that a regulatory approach would. A voluntary approach would also be a significant departure from Canada’s approach to advancing energy efficiency and from the intent of the Act. A voluntary approach would result in fewe...
AI summary A voluntary approach to energy efficiency is argued to be less effective than regulatory measures, citing global evidence that Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) lead to significant energy efficiency improvements and GHG emission reductions. Studies show that countries implementing MEPS have achieved notable energy savings, such as a 32% improvement in Mexico within one year.
ns. Policy case The policy case is defined as the application of the more stringent MEPS across 11 product categories relative to markets defined by studies completed in 2016. Benchmarks For all product categories, benchmarks are chosen to...
AI summary The policy case involves applying more stringent MEPS across 11 product categories based on 2016 studies. Benchmarks are set for products not meeting these standards, with efficiency levels weighted by market share. The social cost of carbon is used to quantify GHG emission reduction benefits, using estimates from Environment and Climate Change Canada and aligning with U.S. methodologies.
ct categories to arrive at the estimate of total energy saved. This was then monetized by multiplying the results by the cost of energy per unit of energy saved (i.e. dollars per kilowatt hour). The reductions in GHG emissions were calcula...
AI summary The analysis estimates energy savings and monetizes them using the cost of energy per unit saved. GHG emissions reductions are calculated using fuel-specific emission factors and a social cost of carbon, with projected annual reductions increasing from 0.13 Mt in 2020 to 1.03 Mt in 2030.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 2 Page 11 of 44 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 152, Number 42: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 (Amendment 15) Negative numbers in the table indicate that these particular sub...
AI summary This document discusses the economic impacts of amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, focusing on benefits and costs for various product categories, including household gas and oil-fired boilers. Negative net benefits are noted for some subcategories, but they are retained to achieve broader objectives.
$0.00 $29.63 $29.63 Commercial gasfired water heaters $29.42 $47.23 $17.81 Commercial gasfired storage water heater $15.01 $42.01 $27.00 Residentialduty commercial gasfired storage water heater $5.53 $1.53 $4.00 Commercial gasfired i...
AI summary The table presents costs for various water heaters and furnaces, along with benefits from energy savings and GHG emission reductions. It notes that numbers may not add up due to rounding and covers shipments impacted by proposed regulations between 2019 and 2030. All figures are discounted to the year 2018.
$0.12 administrative costs Government administration Government $0.10 $0 $0.10 $0.01 Total costs $34.89 $146.67 $1,040.49 $104.53 Net benefits $132.28 $231.54 $1,804.06 $181.24 B. Quantified impacts (in non$) Energy savings (petajoules) 1...
AI summary The table outlines administrative and total costs, as well as net benefits and quantified impacts such as energy savings and GHG emission reductions from 2019 to 2030. It also highlights additional benefits of energy efficiency, including cost savings, productivity, and environmental improvements, while noting the lack of data on certain non-energy benefits.
energy benefits related to energy efficiency, such as increased occupant comfort, better indoor air quality and minimizing risks of depressurization in new constructions with better envelopes. The analysis has quantified costs and benefi...
AI summary The text discusses the energy benefits of energy efficiency measures, such as improved occupant comfort and indoor air quality. It also outlines an analysis of the costs and benefits of various product categories relative to a 2016 business-as-usual case, noting that the proposed MEPS will prevent the dumping of low-efficiency products into the Canadian market.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 2 Page 13 of 44 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 152, Number 42: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 (Amendment 15) Another benefit of the Amendment is related to the verified ener...
AI summary The Amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, provides benefits by making verified energy efficiency performance data accessible to consumers and businesses. However, it also introduces an increase in administrative burden for dealers of new product categories, estimated at $72,161 annually, and is classified as an 'IN' under the 'One-for-One' Rule.
r data element, with each report requiring two data elements. These activities would be undertaken by administrative support with a wage rate of approximately $29. Submitting efficiency reports The Amendment would introduce an administrati...
AI summary The text discusses the administrative burden associated with new energy efficiency reporting requirements, including data input time, number of affected stakeholders, and wage rates for administrative staff. Data sources include compliance databases, market studies, and government agencies.
mental outreach activities specific to the Amendment to educate importers and mitigate the risk that goods are refused entry into Canada due to the unintentional omission of data or information. Natural Resources Canada estimates that the...
AI summary The Amendment aims to educate importers and ensure compliance with new reporting requirements for energy-related products, affecting small manufacturers. Natural Resources Canada estimates that 10 small manufacturers will be impacted, with some already complying and others needing adjustments. Consultations are ongoing to address concerns and ensure the requirements are feasible.
ltations; however, Natural Resources Canada will continue discussions with these companies and welcomes comments from them or any other small businesses that could be affected. Consultation Preconsultation summary The Amendment introduces...
AI summary The document outlines the consultation process for the Amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, which updates MEPS, testing standards, and reporting requirements for 12 product categories. Stakeholders were engaged from 2016 onwards, with key communication materials released in February 2016 and March 2017.
nization with the U.S. Department of Energy’s prepublished final rule and welcomes the submission of detailed information regarding problematic installations and their associated impacts and costs. Five manufacturers, three associations, a...
AI summary The text discusses the proposed Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for gas boilers, with stakeholders suggesting applying the standards to new construction only. Natural Resources Canada acknowledges concerns but believes the industry can manage the transition to condensing technology, emphasizing proper installation and venting.
n condensing technology levels for gas hot water boilers and welcomes the submission of information and data from interested parties regarding the potential impacts of implementing these levels. Five manufacturers and three associations st...
AI summary The document discusses proposed energy efficiency standards for gas hot water boilers and commercial water heaters, with stakeholders providing feedback on their potential impacts. Some stakeholders argue that the proposed standards may not deliver expected energy savings in certain systems, while others support the standards and suggest adjustments to service life and implementation timelines.
rol valves and that would be costly. Natural Resources Canada agrees that both units would be subject to the same limit and changed it to seven days to be consistent with the CSA test procedure. One manufacturer advocated the benefits of s...
AI summary The document discusses amendments to energy efficiency regulations for gas fireplaces, including changes to static operation limits and ignition system requirements. Natural Resources Canada adjusted limits based on stakeholder input and shifted from prescriptive to performance-based standards to accommodate future technologies.
that achieves the same energy efficiency goals. Natural Resources Canada agrees and removed the prescriptive nature of the ignition system requirements, in favour of performancebased requirements. One manufacturer and one association requ...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency standards for gas fireplaces and furnaces, including the removal of prescriptive requirements for ignition systems and the debate over raising minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for gas furnaces. Natural Resources Canada supports performance-based standards and higher MEPS, while some industry groups oppose it, citing concerns over cost and consumer choice.
ease in the cost of a compliant furnace. Natural Resources Canada disagrees that consumers will be driven to fuel switch or to make irrational repair decisions due to the incremental cost increase. One industry association, two manufacture...
AI summary Natural Resources Canada disagrees with industry stakeholders' concerns regarding the cost increase of compliant furnaces and the need for separate categories for mobile home furnaces. They argue that compliant furnaces are available and that mobile homes in Canada are classified differently than in the United States.
the costs used in Natural Resources Canada’s economic analysis, with one manufacturer providing supporting data. Natural Resources Canada performed the analysis based on the best data available. Two manufacturers stated that the proposed s...
AI summary The text discusses concerns raised by manufacturers regarding the proposed energy efficiency standards for gas boilers, particularly in existing high-temperature distribution systems. While some argue for a lower efficiency standard of 84% AFUE for replacement installations, Natural Resources Canada maintains that the proposed MEPS is achievable and supported by market data showing consumer preference for condensing boilers.
oposed MEPS, and that the majority of these are used as replacement boilers. As a result, Natural Resources Canada disagrees with the need to lower performance standards for the replacement market. Household instantaneous gasfired water h...
AI summary The document discusses proposed changes to Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for gas-fired water heaters, with Natural Resources Canada disagreeing with lowering standards for replacements. It also highlights regulatory cooperation between Canada and the U.S. to reduce GHG emissions, including the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.
orial governments, it would contribute to the objective of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement by reducing and eliminating, to the extent possible, barriers to the movement of goods within Canada. Internationally, Canada has benefited from a...
AI summary The text discusses international regulatory cooperation between Canada and the U.S. to align energy efficiency standards, reduce regulatory barriers, and lower GHG emissions. It highlights the benefits of the Amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, including reduced energy costs and environmental benefits.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 2 Page 21 of 44 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 152, Number 42: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 (Amendment 15) According to the International Energy Agency, policies and progr...
AI summary The document discusses the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency policies in reducing GHG emissions and highlights the benefits of stricter MEPS regulations. It argues that despite higher initial costs, compliance with these standards will lead to long-term energy savings and monetary benefits for consumers.
shown that the overall costs of technologies that will be required to bring lowefficiency products into compliance with the MEPS proposed in this Amendment are outweighed by the overall benefits. The Amendment is supported by provincial a...
AI summary The Amendment aims to align with U.S. energy efficiency standards and support federal and provincial climate goals by setting high MEPS for heating equipment. It is supported by provincial and territorial governments and designed to minimize industry burden through existing testing standards.
ral Resources Canada by the dealer in an energy efficiency report as specified in the Regulations. This is required once for each product model before first importation or interprovincial shipment. Import reporting and monitoring Natural R...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for import reporting and monitoring under the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016. Natural Resources Canada verifies compliance through crosschecking import data with energy efficiency reports and conducts audits and product testing as part of compliance monitoring.
y competitive and suppliers are cognizant of performance claims made by their competitors. Challenge procedures by which performance claims can be questioned exist in all verification programs. Performance measurement and evaluation The de...
AI summary The text discusses the measurement of performance outcomes under regulations aimed at reducing GHG emissions and helping consumers save money through energy-efficient products. Key indicators include energy efficiency reports, market data, and lab testing.
Lab testing commercial building floor space. Emission factors Businesses using regulated energyusing products save money that can lead to Energy prices increased productivity and competitiveness. Performance will be monitored through a co...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency regulations, focusing on compliance monitoring, emission factors, and the role of lab testing and third-party verification. It outlines methods for tracking performance and the impact of energy consumption on both GHG emissions and consumer savings. The standards are part of a federal program, and progress is reported in various official documents.
ct. Contact Jamie Hulan Director Equipment Division Office of Energy Efficiency Natural Resources Canada 930 Carling Avenue, Building 3, 1st Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0Y3 http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181020/html/reg3eng.html...
AI summary The document outlines a proposed amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, by the Governor in Council under sections 20(a) and 25 of the Energy Efficiency Act. The amendment involves changing the heading of Division 4 of Part 2. Public comments are invited within 70 days of publication.
Period of Item Product Standard Energy Efficiency Standard Manufacture 1 Decorative N\A The product must be capable of On or after gas January 1, (a) automatically extinguishing pilot flame when main gas burner flame is fireplaces 2020 est...
AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency standards for decorative gas fireplaces, specifying requirements for automatic flame control and efficiency thresholds. The standards apply to products manufactured on or after January 1, 2020.
unless it is marked for replacement use only, have a direct vent configuration. 2 Fireplace efficiency ≥ 50% The product must be capable of http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181020/html/reg3eng.html 25/44 Date Filed: March 29, 20...
AI summary The text discusses regulations amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifically focusing on fireplace efficiency standards and ignition system requirements. It includes technical specifications such as automatic pilot flame extinguishing and efficiency thresholds.
f it meets that standard when tested in accordance with testing procedures established by 10 C.F.R. Appendix AA that are applicable to an electric furnace as defined in section 272. Information 275 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the...
AI summary The text outlines regulations regarding the testing and performance standards for electric furnaces and energy-recovery ventilators, referencing specific testing procedures and standards such as 10 C.F.R. Appendix AA and CSA C439-18.
or blowers, has a rated net supply airflow of not more than 142 L/s (300 cubic feet/minute) and transfers heat and moisture between two isolated airstreams. (ventilateur récupérateur d’énergie) heatrecovery ventilator means a factorybui...
AI summary The text defines energy-recovery and heat-recovery ventilators, specifying their airflow limits and efficiency requirements. It also outlines when these devices are classified as energy-using products and the information that must be provided to the Minister, including airflow, efficiency, and power consumption data.
is greater than or equal to 10°C, its sensible heat recovery efficiency at 25°C and the associated net supply airflow, expressed in L/s. Heatrecovery Ventilators Energyusing product 279 (1) A heatrecovery ventilator is prescribed as a...
AI summary The text outlines regulations related to heat-recovery ventilators, specifying conditions under which they are classified as energy-using products and the information required for compliance with CSA C439-18. It also references amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, including the addition of CSA P.2 standards for testing fuel utilization efficiency.
Standby power ≤ 8 W Offmode power ≤ 8 W 3 Household gas boilers that are intended CGA P.2 Annual fuel utilization efficiency On or after for hot water systems ≥ 80% December 31, 1998 and before September 1, 2010 4 Household gas boilers th...
AI summary The document outlines efficiency standards for household gas boilers intended for hot water systems, specifying standby and off-mode power limits and annual fuel utilization efficiency requirements, with different standards applying depending on the date range.
tankless domestic water heating coils power and offmode power No continuously burning pilot light http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181020/html/reg3eng.html 29/44 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-28 Attachment 2 Page 30 of...
AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial gas boilers with input rates between 88 kW and 733 kW, requiring a thermal efficiency of at least 90%. It also discusses specifications for tankless domestic water heating coils, including power consumption and the absence of continuously burning pilot lights.
Standby power ≤ 11 W Offmode power ≤ 11 W 3 Household oilfired boilers that are ASHRAE 103 Annual fuel utilization On or after intended for hot water systems efficiency ≥ 84% September 1, 2010 and before September 1, 2012 4 Household oil...
AI summary The text outlines efficiency standards for household oil-fired boilers, specifying annual fuel utilization efficiency and standby/off-mode power requirements, with compliance dates ranging from September 1, 2010, to January 15, 2021.
and not operable without the device 6 Household oilfired boilers that are CSA P.2 for annual fuel Annual fuel utilization On or after intended for hot water systems and do not utilization efficiency, standby efficiency ≥ 86% January 15, 2...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for household and commercial oil-fired boilers, specifying requirements for annual fuel utilization efficiency, standby power, and off-mode power, with effective dates and compliance thresholds.
/h) but ≤ 733 kW (2,500,000 Btu/h) Thermal efficiency and are intended for hot water systems ≥ 87% http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181020/html/reg3eng.html 32/44 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-28 Attachment 2 Page 33 of...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for commercial and household oil-fired boilers, specifying thermal and combustion efficiency requirements based on input rates and intended use, with updates to the regulations effective from specific dates.
10 C.F.R. Standby loss, in %/hr ≤ Appendix B 0.3 + 102.2/Vs 28 Section 373 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Information 373 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the information set out in column 3 of the table to...
AI summary The text references a regulation amendment related to energy efficiency, specifically concerning the collection of information about electric water heaters. It cites a section from the Canadian Federal Regulations (10 C.F.R.) and includes a table outlining standards for standby loss and volume rating (Vr). A link to the original regulation is also provided.
efficiency standard set out in any efficiency standard set out in any of paragraphs 3(b), 4(b), 5(b) of paragraphs 3(a), 4(a), 5(a) and and 6(b) of Table 1 to section 376. 6(a) of Table 1 to section 376; and (h) its uniform energy factor a...
AI summary The text outlines conditions for compliance with energy efficiency standards, referencing paragraphs and tables from section 376. It emphasizes verification by a certification body and adherence to specific efficiency standards.
ended by adding the following after Table 1: TABLE 2 Column 1 Column 2 Item Energyusing Product Energy Efficiency Standard http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181020/html/reg3eng.html 38/44 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-2...
AI summary The document references regulations amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifically focusing on energy efficiency standards for commercial oil-fired storage water heaters. Two items outline specific efficiency requirements for different categories of water heaters manufactured on or after January 1, 2020.
, that are manufactured on or after Thermal January 1, 2020 efficiency ≥ 80% Standby loss ≤ Q/0.234 + 16.57√Vs 38 Section 381 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Information 381 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, t...
AI summary This section of the regulations replaces Section 381, specifying that information related to oil-fired storage water heaters must be collected according to a defined standard and provided to the Minister. The regulation includes a table outlining the energy-using product, the standard, and the required information.
urer engages in with the certification body, e.g. safety certification, energy efficiency verification, as well as the number of products and models the manufacturer has. 17 Marginal fuels represent the last power plant that is needed to m...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency verification processes, marginal fuel costs and emissions, discount rates aligned with the Pan-Canadian Framework, and references to studies and regulations related to appliance energy efficiency standards in Canada.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 2 Page 43 of 44 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 152, Number 42: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 (Amendment 15) 23 Stakeholders that were informed include all organizations and...
AI summary The text discusses the stakeholders informed about the 2016 Energy Efficiency Regulations Amendment 15, including manufacturers, distributors, and government bodies. It references documents and regulations related to energy efficiency, such as the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Support Document and the Regulatory Partnership Statement between Canada and the U.S. It also mentions methods for quantifying GHG emissions and consumer savings.
by fuel. 31 SOR/2016311 a S.C. 2009, c. 8, s. 5 b S.C. 1992, c. 36 Government of Canada activities and initiatives #YourBudget2018 – Advancement (https://www.budget.gc.ca/2018/docs/themes/advancementadvancementen.html? utm_source=CanCa&...
AI summary The document contains links to the Canadian government's 2018 budget themes, including advancement, reconciliation, and progress, along with references to regulations amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016. These documents highlight initiatives and activities related to energy efficiency and Indigenous reconciliation.
Energy Efficiency Act Sponsoring department Department of Natural Resources REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT (This statement is not part of the Regulations.) Executive summary Issues: Greenhouse gases are primary contributors to climat...
AI summary The Energy Efficiency Act aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by improving energy efficiency standards in the building sector, aligning with national policies like the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. This initiative supports energy cost savings, environmental benefits, and regulatory harmonization with the United States.
tments will provide benefits to Canadians through energy cost savings and improved environmental outcomes, which lead to increased productivity, competitiveness and energy affordability. Since 2011, the United States Department of Energy h...
AI summary The text discusses proposed amendments to Canada's Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, aimed at aligning with U.S. regulations and improving energy efficiency standards for residential and commercial products. The goal is to reduce regulatory differences, support cross-border trade, and help achieve Canada's GHG emissions reduction targets.
the Amendment is estimated to be $1.15 billion and $335 million, respectively. On an annualized average basis, this equates to benefits and costs of $116 million and $34 million, respectively. The quantified benefits have been calculated a...
AI summary The Amendment is estimated to have benefits of $1.15 billion and costs of $335 million over its service life, with annualized benefits and costs of $116 million and $34 million, respectively. Benefits include energy savings and GHG emission reductions, while costs include technology, administrative, and regulatory implementation expenses. The Amendment is considered an 'IN' under the 'One-for-One' Rule and impacts seven small Canadian manufacturers, most of whom already comply with the requirements.
manufacturers that are expected to incur incremental costs have been engaged in consultations, but have not raised any compliance issues associated with the size of their respective companies. Domestic and international coordination and co...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of an amendment to reduce regulatory differences between Canada and the United States, aligning with binational commitments. It also mentions the 1992 Energy Efficiency Act, which established minimum energy performance standards for products sold or leased in Canada.
e and compare the energy use of a given product model relative to others in their category. They are regularly amended to introduce new energyusing products and to update existing requirements. Since most energyusing products must cross...
AI summary Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) and ENERGY STAR® labelling programs are effective tools for improving energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions by removing inefficient products from the market and encouraging innovation. These programs are widely adopted and recognized as cost-effective solutions in many countries.
S and labelling programs are among the most costeffective GHG emissions reduction policies and are the cornerstone of energy efficiency and climate change programs in more than 80 countries. 2 Policy context Canada committed to reduce its...
AI summary Energy efficiency and labelling programs are key GHG reduction strategies, supported by international efforts and Canadian commitments under the Paris Agreement. The Pan-Canadian Framework outlines actions for the building sector, including improving new and existing buildings, supporting Indigenous communities, and enhancing appliance efficiency.
xisting buildings, as well as fuel switching; (3) supporting building codes and energyefficient housing in Indigenous communities; and (4) improving energy efficiency for appliances and equipment. In June 2018, the Generation Energy Counc...
AI summary The text discusses the role of energy efficiency in reducing GHG emissions, particularly in the building sector. It highlights the importance of energy efficiency in meeting Canada's emission reduction targets and improving economic competitiveness. The building sector is identified as a significant contributor to GHG emissions, with specific attention to residential and commercial buildings.
n expected 36% increase (or 4.4 million) in the number of Canadian households (a key driver of residential emissions growth) between 2005 and 2030. GHG emissions from Canada’s commercial buildings http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/201812...
AI summary The text discusses the expected increase in Canadian households and associated residential emissions growth, noting that commercial building emissions have increased and are expected to remain constant despite rising floor space. It highlights market failures that hinder optimal energy efficiency choices, such as lack of consumer awareness and split incentives.
l energy use, a lack of capacity within organizations to understand and manage energy use, and split incentives (e.g. landlords may not purchase efficient equipment if tenants pay the energy bill). In 2011, the Canada–United States Regulat...
AI summary The document discusses the need for regulatory action to address energy inefficiency, split incentives, and regulatory differences between Canada and the U.S. The objectives of the Amendment include reducing GHG emissions, energy consumption, and unnecessary regulatory differences to support cross-border trade.
e desired outcomes of the Amendment are as follows: GHG emissions are reduced, contributing to Canada’s goal to reduce GHG emissions by at least 30% below 2005 levels by 2030; Consumers save money by purchasing higher efficiency product mo...
AI summary The Amendment aims to reduce GHG emissions, save consumers and businesses money, and align with North American testing standards by introducing or increasing MEPS for 17 product categories. It was initiated in 2017 and includes new and updated requirements for energy efficiency.
apply on that same date in the United States. Performance would be measured in accordance with testing standards aligned with those of the United States. Miscellaneous refrigeration products Miscellaneous refrigeration products (MRPs) are...
AI summary The text outlines amendments to minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for various refrigeration products and ceiling fans, aligning them with U.S. standards effective from specific dates. It emphasizes performance testing aligned with U.S. practices and the inclusion of new product categories such as residential wine coolers and combination cooler refrigeration products.
the United States. Central air conditioners and heat pumps (single package central air conditioner, splitsystem central air conditioner, single package heat pumps and splitsystem heat pumps) Central air conditioners and heat pumps are si...
AI summary The text outlines amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, focusing on minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for central air conditioners, heat pumps, and chillers. The amendments align with standards in the United States and Ontario, particularly for units manufactured after specific dates.
that have adopted the ASHRAE standard. Performance would be measured in accordance with testing standards aligned with those used in the United States and Ontario. Refrigerated vending machines Refrigerated vending machines are used in com...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for refrigerated vending machines and single package vertical air conditioners and heat pumps, referencing the ASHRAE standard and MEPS levels aligned with U.S. regulations. It specifies performance testing standards and compliance dates.
th a cooling capacity <19 kW (<65 000 Btu/h) manufactured on or after September 23, 2019, the Amendment would set the MEPS to levels that will apply on that same date in the United States. For SPVACs and SPVHPs with a cooling capacity ≥19...
AI summary The text outlines amendments to Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for specific cooling and refrigeration equipment, aligning them with U.S. standards based on manufacturing dates. It also introduces reporting requirements for portable air conditioners.
al duct. They include a source of refrigeration and may include additional means for air circulation and heating. They typically sit on the floor and come with an installation kit for quick set up. For PACs manufactured on or after October...
AI summary The text discusses portable air conditioners (PACs) and the regulatory requirements for energy efficiency reports and importation reports for those manufactured after October 1, 2017. It also highlights the importance of reducing GHG emissions from the building sector to meet Canada's 2030 target, noting that maintaining the status quo would hinder progress.
nsumption to the extent that a regulatory approach would. A voluntary approach would also be a significant departure from Canada’s approach to advancing energy efficiency and the intent of the Act. A voluntary approach would result in fewe...
AI summary A voluntary approach to energy efficiency would lead to fewer GHG emission reductions compared to regulatory measures. Evidence from countries like Mexico shows significant energy efficiency improvements after implementing MEPS. MEPS programs globally have led to energy consumption reductions of 10% to 25%. Regulatory differences between Canada and the U.S. do not create burdens for industry where only one country enforces mandatory requirements.
ption associated with the Amendment are estimated to be 0.4 petajoules (PJ) in 2020, and to reach 3.57 PJ in 2030 as the sale of more efficient equipment steadily replaces the preregulation stock. Annual reductions in GHG emissions result...
AI summary The Amendment is expected to result in significant energy savings and GHG emission reductions, with estimated benefits exceeding costs by a ratio of more than three to one by 2030. The cumulative present value of net benefits is estimated at $818 million by 2030.
) Benefits Energy (gas and Technology Energy electricity) costs savings (PJ) savings Avoided damages Outside air quality, competitiveness, job growth, home comfort, indoor air Installation GHG because of GHG quality, minimizing depressuriz...
AI summary The document outlines a cost-benefit analysis of the new and more stringent MEPS (Minimum Energy Performance Standards) by Natural Resources Canada. It compares a business-as-usual case (excluding the Amendment) with a policy case (including the Amendment) to assess economic gains and societal impacts.
imate social cost of carbon values at $46.84/tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2018 (in 2018$), increasing each year with the expected growth in damages. 17 Methodology to estimate costs The additional or “incremental” costs associated...
AI summary The text discusses the methodology for estimating the incremental costs and benefits associated with an Amendment, focusing on the difference between inefficient and modified product models meeting new MEPS standards, and the inclusion of various cost components while excluding certain compliance and verification costs.
e they are confidential business costs that vary based on business relationships. 18 However, they are estimated to be less than 10% of the total testing costs. Methodology to estimate benefits Energy savings for each product category were...
AI summary The text discusses a methodology for estimating energy savings and costs associated with meeting Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS). Energy savings are calculated by comparing the energy use of benchmark and modified product models, factoring in usage patterns, shipments, and product lifespan. Results are monetized based on energy cost per unit.
ct categories to arrive at the estimate of total energy saved. This was then monetized by multiplying the results by the cost of energy per unit of energy saved (i.e. dollars per kilowatt hour). The reductions in GHG emissions were calcula...
AI summary The document outlines a methodology for estimating energy savings and GHG emissions reductions from an amendment. Energy savings are calculated using cost per unit of energy saved, while GHG reductions are determined using fuel-specific emission factors and a social cost of carbon for monetization.
its. A 2018 study 23 found that each doubling of production for residential gas furnaces lead to a 5.7% to 8.9% decrease in manufacturing costs. Data collection and sources Data is collected on a productbyproduct basis, through market st...
AI summary The text discusses a 2018 study on the impact of increasing production for residential gas furnaces, showing decreased manufacturing costs with higher production. It outlines data collection methods for market studies, including market size, energy savings, and costs associated with moving from business-as-usual to policy cases. The results are summarized in tables showing benefits and costs per product category.
2030 2020 2030 By 2030 A. Quantified impacts ($) [millions in 2018 prices] Pretax fuel (gas and electricity) savings Canadians $98.91 $112.70 $976.48 $98.10 Benefits Avoided GHG damages Canadians $17.49 $21.47 $176.91 $17.77 Total benefit...
AI summary This table quantifies the economic and environmental impacts of energy efficiency measures in Canada by 2030. It shows pre-tax fuel savings, avoided GHG damages, technology and installation costs, compliance costs, and net benefits. The data highlights the positive economic and environmental outcomes of energy efficiency initiatives.
3.57 23.64 — Canadians GHG emission reductions (megatonnes) 0.04 0.33 2.22 — Note: Numbers may not add up to totals due to rounding. Covers shipments impacted by the proposed Regulations between 2019 and 2030. All benefits and costs are di...
AI summary The text discusses the benefits of energy efficiency regulations, including energy and operating cost savings, increased productivity, and environmental improvements. It also notes that some benefits, such as reduced air pollution and improved occupant comfort, were not quantified due to a lack of data.
energy benefits related to energy efficiency, such as increased occupant comfort, better indoor air quality and minimizing risks of depressurization in new constructions with better envelopes. The analysis has quantified costs and benefi...
AI summary The text discusses the benefits of an amendment to energy efficiency standards, including improved occupant comfort and indoor air quality, and the prevention of low-efficiency products entering the market. It also outlines the administrative burden associated with the amendment and the benefits of making energy efficiency data publicly available.
ces Canada is now proposing product marking requirements for walkin coolers and walkin freezers, which would require a nameplate affixed to the product displaying the brand name, whether it is http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/2018120...
AI summary The document outlines proposed product marking requirements for walk-in coolers and freezers, and discusses updates to energy efficiency regulations, including the adoption of ASHRAE 90.1-2016 and AHRI 551/591-2015 as testing standards for chillers.
ada reference the most recent 2015 version, which is also referenced by ASHRAE 90.12016. Natural Resources Canada agrees and is proposing to reference AHRI 551/5912015 as the testing standard. Two industry associations commented that, du...
AI summary The document discusses the reference of standards for chillers and HVAC equipment, with industry associations requesting a secure mechanism for reporting custom models. Natural Resources Canada agrees to protect such information and proposes using a secure database. It also maintains the requirement for third-party verification for compliance with regulations.
most manufacturers would make representation of their product’s capacity or efficiency, and therefore is proposing to keep the reporting and verification requirements. Regulatory cooperation http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181208/ht...
AI summary The document discusses regulatory cooperation between Canada and the U.S. in aligning energy efficiency standards and testing requirements. It references a 2014 goal set by Natural Resources Canada and the U.S. Department of Energy to enhance information sharing and collaboration on energy efficiency standards.
ory Affairs regarding the Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council, signed in June 2018. The Amendment seeks to foster alignment of federal regulations where feasible and appropriate. In August 2016, federal, provincial and terr...
AI summary The Amendment aims to align federal and provincial energy efficiency regulations, reducing regulatory differences and promoting energy efficiency. This would lower GHG emissions and energy consumption, benefitting consumers through long-term savings despite higher initial costs for compliant technologies.
sis has shown that the costs of technologies that would be required to bring lowefficiency products into compliance with the MEPS proposed in this Amendment are outweighed by the overall benefits. The development of the Amendment was info...
AI summary The Amendment to energy efficiency standards is supported by industry and provincial/territorial governments, aiming to align with U.S. standards and increase harmonization. It is seen as a cost-effective method to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, with existing compliance mechanisms ensuring effectiveness.
e Regulations would continue to be used following the coming into force of this Amendment. The main features of this system are as follows. Verification marking and energy efficiency reporting http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181208/...
AI summary The document outlines the continuation of energy efficiency regulations, including third-party verification of product energy performance and import reporting procedures. Verification is conducted by accredited certification bodies, and dealers must submit energy efficiency reports for each product model before importation or interprovincial shipment.
Emission factors productivity and competitiveness. Energy prices Performance would be monitored through a combination of equipmentspecific compliance reporting, supported by thirdparty verification of energy efficiency performance, and o...
AI summary The text discusses the implementation of energy efficiency regulations, emphasizing compliance monitoring through third-party verification, market data collection, and cooperation with provinces. It also highlights how energy efficiency impacts GHG emissions and consumer savings, with progress tracked in federal reports and business plans.
ss towards achieving the objectives of this initiative would be found in departmental business plans, reports on plans and priorities, and the Report to Parliament under the Energy Efficiency Act. Contact Jamie Hulan Director Equipment Div...
AI summary The document outlines proposed amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, under the Energy Efficiency Act. Key changes include the repeal of the definition of CSA C300-00 and the replacement of subsection 13(1) to specify the EnerGuide label for energy-using products. The notice invites public comments on the proposed regulations.
from time to time. (10 C.F.R. §430.32(s)(2)(i))) ceiling fan means a nonportable device that is suspended from a ceiling for circulating air via the rotation of fan blades. It does not include (a) a ceiling fan if the plane of rotation of...
AI summary The text defines a ceiling fan and outlines energy efficiency standards, including exceptions and testing procedures, as part of the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016. It references 10 C.F.R. §430.32(s)(2)(i) and Appendix U for compliance requirements.
t are throughthewall or smallduct and high seasonal energy efficiency efficiency ratio velocity ratio ≥ 14.0 10 C.F.R. Appendix M for Off mode power off mode power consumption ≤ 30 consumption W 3 Single package central air conditioner...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for single package central air conditioners, specifying minimum seasonal energy efficiency ratios and referencing regulatory standards such as CSA C656-05 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix M. It also includes a reference to a regulation amendment from 2016.
(c) seasonal energy efficiency ratio. 2 Single package central air conditioners that are CSA C65614 for (a) product classification set singlephase, other than those that are throughthewall, information set out in out in column II of Ta...
AI summary The text outlines requirements for single package central air conditioners, including product classification, cooling capacity, seasonal energy efficiency ratio, and off mode power consumption, referencing standards such as CSA C656-14 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix M.
accordance with CSA C74617 and provided to the Minister in respect of a single package vertical air conditioner: (a) its classification as set out in column II of Table 1 to CSA C74617; 22 Section 132 of the Regulations is replaced by th...
AI summary This text outlines regulatory amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifically concerning the classification and energy efficiency standards for split-system central air conditioners, referencing CSA C746-17 and including definitions for terms like 'off mode power consumption' and 'split-system central air conditioner'.
riods set out in column 4. (2) The heading of the table to section 205 is replaced by the following: TABLE 2 (3) Section 205 is amended by adding the following before Table 2: TABLE 1 Column 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 4 Energy Efficiency I...
AI summary The document amends section 205 by replacing the table heading and adding a new table with columns for energy-using products, standards, and periods of manufacture, focusing on energy efficiency requirements for heat pumps.
performance factor (Region V) ≥ 6.7 2 Single package heat pumps, other than CSA C65614 for seasonal energy Seasonal energy On or after January 1, those that are throughthewall or efficiency ratio and heating seasonal efficiency ratio ≥...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for single package heat pumps, specifying minimum seasonal energy efficiency ratios and heating seasonal performance factors, as well as off-mode power consumption limits, effective from January 1, 2017.
performance factor (Region V) ≥ 6.4 5 Single package heat pumps that are CSA C65605 for seasonal energy Seasonal energy On or after January 1, throughthewall efficiency ratio and heating seasonal efficiency ratio ≥ 12.0 2017 performance...
AI summary The document outlines minimum efficiency requirements for single package heat pumps, specifying seasonal energy efficiency ratios and heating seasonal performance factors based on different standards and dates.
Column 2 Column 3 Item Energyusing Product Standard Information 1 Single package heat pumps, other than those that are CSA C65605 (a) product classification set out throughthewall, manufactured on or after February 3, 1995 in column II...
AI summary This document outlines energy-using product standards, specifically for single package heat pumps, referencing CSA C656-05 and including details such as product classification, cooling and heating capacities, and energy efficiency ratios. The text also references a regulation amendment from the Canada Gazette.
NS Power IR-28 Attachment 3 Page 33 of 45 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 152, Number 49: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 (e) heating seasonal performance factor and the region for the factor.
AI summary This text references a regulation amendment related to energy efficiency, specifically focusing on the heating seasonal performance factor and its associated region.
region for the factor; (f) off mode power consumption; and (g) phase of electric current.
AI summary The text outlines various factors related to energy consumption, including off mode power consumption and the phase of electric current. These factors are likely relevant to energy efficiency and regulatory considerations.
region for the factor; (f) off mode power consumption; and (g) phase of electric current. http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181208/html/reg3eng.html 33/45 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-28 Attachment 3 Page 34 of 45 3/15/2019...
AI summary The text references regulations amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, focusing on factors such as off mode power consumption and phase of electric current. The document is part of a regulatory proceeding and includes a citation to the Canada Gazette.
6 Single package heat pumps that are threephase, CSA C65605 for information (a) product classification set out throughthewall and manufactured on or after January 1, 2017 set out in paragraphs (a) to in column II of Table 1 to (e) CSA...
AI summary The text discusses the requirements for single package heat pumps, including product classification, cooling and heating capacities, energy efficiency ratios, and electrical phase requirements, as outlined in CSA C656-05. It also references a regulatory change under subsection 208(2) of the Regulations.
Energy efficiency ratio On or after January 1, 2011 and < 19 kW (65,000 Btu/h) ≥ 9.0 before September 23, 2019 Heating coefficient of performance ≥ 3.0 2 Single package vertical heat pumps that have a cooling capacity of Energy efficiency...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency requirements for single package vertical heat pumps based on cooling capacity and dates, including minimum energy efficiency ratios and heating coefficients of performance. The regulations were amended and published in the Canada Gazette.
riods set out in column 4. (2) The heading of the table to section 213 is replaced by the following: TABLE 2 (3) Section 213 is amended by adding the following before Table 2: TABLE 1 Column 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 4 Energy Efficiency I...
AI summary The text discusses amendments to a table in section 213, including the addition of a new table (Table 1) with columns detailing energy efficiency standards for split-system heat pumps, including specific performance metrics and periods of manufacture.
(e) heating seasonal performance factor and the region for the factor. 2 Splitsystem heat pumps that are singlephase and CSA C65614 for information set (a) product classification set out in manufactured on or after January 1, 2017 out i...
AI summary The text discusses the requirements for split-system heat pumps manufactured on or after January 1, 2017, including product classification, cooling and heating capacities, energy efficiency ratios, and performance factors as outlined in CSA C656-14 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix M.
laced by the following: Testing standard (2) The refrigerated beverage vending machine complies with the energy efficiency standard if it meets that standard in the following circumstances: (a) subject to paragraph (b), it is manufactured...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines, specifying different testing procedures and compliance criteria based on the manufacturing date and ambient temperature during testing.
Column 2 Column 3 Item Energyusing Product Energy Efficiency Standard Period of Manufacture 4 Class A refrigerated beverage vending Edaily ≤ 0.00194 � V + 2.56 On or after August 31, 2012 and before machines January 8, 2019 Must be capabl...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines, specifying different classes and periods of manufacture, along with corresponding energy consumption formulas. It also mentions the replacement of Section 649 of the Regulations.
n vending Edaily ≤ 0.00392 � V + 2.04 On or after January 8, 2019 machines 45 Section 649 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Information 649 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the information set out in column 3 o...
AI summary Section 649 of the Regulations is updated to require the collection of specific information regarding refrigerated beverage vending machines, including daily energy consumption, vendible capacity, and classification details, in accordance with ASHRAE 32.1 standards.
at the product is for indoor use only, if applicable. Idem (3) For matched refrigeration systems, the statement referred to in paragraph (2)(e) must appear on the dedicated condensing unit. http://gazette.gc.ca/rppr/p1/2018/20181208/htm...
AI summary The text outlines amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifically regarding walk-in refrigeration systems. It specifies conditions under which these systems are considered energy-using products and sets energy efficiency standards applicable during defined manufacturing periods.
., 2018. Experience Curves of Residential Gasfired Furnaces in Canada. 24 Costs for technology and installation. 25 Benefits from energy savings and GHG emission reductions. 26 The administrative burden reported in Table 3 was estimated a...
AI summary The text discusses the costs and benefits of residential gas-fired furnaces in Canada, including energy savings, GHG emission reductions, and administrative burdens. It mentions the use of discount rates for cost-benefit analysis and references standards and stakeholders involved in the regulatory process.
esidential Buildings. 31 ANSI/AHRI Standard 551/5912011 (SI) — Performance Rating Of WaterChilling and Heat Pump WaterHeating Packages Using the Vapor Compression Cycle. 32 https://www.canada.ca/en/treasuryboardsecretariat/corporate/t...
AI summary The text references various standards and regulations related to energy efficiency, including ANSI/AHRI Standard 551/591-2011 and the Canada-US Regulatory Cooperation Council's joint forward plan. It also cites legislative and regulatory documents, such as SOR/2016-311 and S.C. 2009, c. 8, s. 5, and mentions government initiatives like #YourBudget2018 – Advancement and Reconciliation.
rst Nations Home Energy Efficiency program component is new and no 22 projects have been completed to date in the pilot, there are no historical program costs 23 that can help form assumptions for this program’s costs. Instead, program cos...
AI summary The First Nations Home Energy Efficiency program is a new initiative with no completed projects to date, making it difficult to estimate costs. Historical costs from the HomeWarming program were used, but the program manager noted these were too low due to additional upgrades offered in the First Nations Pilot. The measure characterization was revised to a more accurate cost estimate.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 • In the New Residential program, the program manager identified two updates. First, in 2 their next service delivery contract, delivery agent costs will increase for the high- 3 performance home measures (shown as measu...
AI summary The document outlines updates to the New Residential program, including increased delivery agent costs for high-performance home measures and changes to the measure mix. It also discusses updated savings estimates for the Green Heat Program and revised incentive unit costs in EMIS. EfficiencyOne identified gaps and developed program enhancements, excluding certain initiatives.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-35: 2 3 Reference: Evid...
AI summary EfficiencyOne responds to a request regarding how the Preferred Plan addresses changes in energy markets, research on DSM program efficacy, and access to DSM programs for residential and BNI customers. It emphasizes monitoring product prices and considering new energy-efficient products.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 b) The Preferred Plan continues to rely on an evidence-based approach to monitor and respond 2 to program efficacy and performance, and changes in technology. Sections 5.1 and 5.2 in 3 the Evidence Section describes how...
AI summary The Preferred Plan uses an evidence-based approach to monitor and adjust programs based on technology trends and customer behavior. It expands access to energy efficiency programs for rental housing and First Nations communities and includes demand-reduction incentives. Barriers to energy efficiency and mitigation strategies are outlined in tables within the Evidence section.
Programs, Efficiency Nova Scotia has achieved independently-verified annual energy 14 savings of 1,171.9 GWh against its NSUARB-Approved Target of 1,082.8 GWh (or 15 108.2%). Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-36 Page 2 of 2 Effic...
AI summary EfficiencyOne has achieved independently-verified annual energy savings of 1,171.9 GWh, exceeding its NSUARB-approved target of 1,082.8 GWh by 108.2%. The document relates to an application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the period 2020-2022.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-37: 2 3 Reference: Appe...
AI summary EfficiencyOne clarifies that it did not use the 2014 IRP Mid-level DSM Case energy savings targets for its 2020-2022 Preferred DSM Plan. Instead, it developed a plan focused on cost-effective DSM programming and diversified its portfolio to address accelerated adoption of measures like lighting.
93.09 196.95 200.89 204.91 209.00 BNI Deviation From Correct - % - Coinc. Demand Savings (kW) -4.3% -6.0% -7.7% -6.1% -4.4% -2.8% -1.1% 0.6% 2.4% 4.1% Sector Avoided Cost Savings Types 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 Resi...
AI summary The text presents data on BNI's deviation from correct coincident demand savings percentages over several years, showing increasing discrepancies. It also references an EfficiencyOne application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity and efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the DSM 2020-2022 period, with matter number M09096.
rization. This characterization is unique in that it consists of one modelled 25 “measure” within Navigant’s ProCESS modelling tool, consistent with past treatment 26 within the ELRAM modelling tool. The source characterization for the Cus...
AI summary This text discusses the characterization of a demand reduction measure within EfficiencyOne's Custom program component, referencing past modeling tools and an attachment detailing the planned focus on demand reduction projects. It is part of a response to Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 development process, the final amount of Custom activity (e.g., investment and savings), 2 inclusive of demand response activity, was determined. 3 4 Note that the actual calculation of total investment for a measure occ...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of total investment and demand savings for prescriptive demand reduction measures using Navigant’s ProCESS model. It references EfficiencyOne’s analysis and the source characterizations detailed in their IR response to NS Power IR-41 and NS Power IR-42.
e Quantity - Demand Focused Efforts 0 111.18 153,221.67 $24,480.00 $30,644.00 2020 2021 2022 Total ProCESS measure quantity (Preferred Plan) 30.16 31.16 32.17 93.49 Custom Demand from Demand Focused Efforts (Preferred Plan) (MW) 3.36 3.47...
AI summary The text presents data on demand-focused efforts and associated investments under the EfficiencyOne application for a supply agreement between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the period 2020-2022. It includes metrics on process measures, custom demand, and investment amounts.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 For domestic hot water (DHW) Timer...
AI summary The document discusses the selection of an EUL value for domestic hot water timers and the technical review of ETS products available in Nova Scotia. It highlights the range of ETS systems and their power outputs, as well as the dependency of heat rate outputs on charge and discharge hours.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 MSHP – Refers to a mini-split, or ductless, heat pump. 2 3 MURB – Refers to a Multi-Unit Residential Building. 4 5 PAC – Refers to the Program Administrator Cost [Test]. 6 7 pre-RUL – This abbreviation refers to pre-Rema...
AI summary The document defines various acronyms and terms related to energy efficiency programs, including MSHP, MURB, PAC, pre-RUL, R and BR Lamps, RET, and ROB. These terms are relevant to program design, equipment replacement strategies, and baseline calculations in energy efficiency initiatives.
pared for The New England State Program Working Group (SPWG) For use as an Energy Efficiency Measures/Programs Reference Document for the ISO Forward Capacity Market (FCM) June 2007 Prepared and Submitted by: GDS Associates, Inc. • 1181 El...
AI summary The document is a reference for energy efficiency measures and programs used in the ISO Forward Capacity Market (FCM), prepared by GDS Associates, Inc. for the New England State Program Working Group. It includes an introduction, methodology, and sections on measure life definitions and recommended values for residential and commercial lighting and HVAC measures.
B. Data Review and Analysis, and Propose Draft and Final Default Measure Life Values .................................................................................. II-2 APPENDIX A – Background Detail Considered in Development of Common...
AI summary The document outlines the process for reviewing and analyzing data to propose draft and final default measure life values. It acknowledges contributions from key individuals and organizations involved in the development of the report, including members of the New England State Program Working Group (SPWG) and energy efficiency program administrators.
Page i Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 36 I. INTRODUCTION AND RESULTS The New England State Program Working Group (SPWG)1 contracted with GDS Associates, Inc. (GDS) to research current practices and develop...
AI summary This document outlines a study commissioned by the New England State Program Working Group (SPWG) to develop standardized measure life values for energy efficiency programs, focusing on residential and commercial/industrial lighting and HVAC measures. The goal is to meet ISO-NE requirements and ensure consistency across New England states for use in the Forward Capacity Market (FCM).
FCM; and • Accurately reflect conditions for measures installed by energy efficiency programs in the New England states that have supported this research effort. Key SPWG members reviewed previous and proposed measure life definitions and...
AI summary This document outlines the process of developing common measure life values for energy efficiency programs in New England, involving input from SPWG members and data from multiple sources. The report includes an introduction, methodology, and sections detailing the final definitions and values for residential and C&I lighting and HVAC measures.
currently addressed in SPWG members’ energy efficiency programs. Section II (Methodology) – provides more information regarding data sources and collection approaches. Appendix A (Background Detail) – presents a compilation of data tables...
AI summary The document outlines the structure of a report on energy efficiency programs, including sections on methodology, data sources, and appendices with detailed information. It also discusses the definition of measure life used in the report, developed through collaboration with the SPWG and based on previous definitions reviewed by GDS.
Table 1 - Residential Measures [Note 1] Measure Measure Life Lighting Bulb (CFL screw base) - Retail 6 years or product specific Bulb (CFL screw base) - Direct Install Site specific values to be used where known 13 years - retrofit Exit Si...
AI summary This table outlines the expected lifespans of various residential energy efficiency measures, including lighting products, lighting controls, and heating and cooling systems. Lifespans vary depending on the type of measure and whether it is for new construction or retrofit.
years Tank Temperature Turn-Down 4 years [Note 2] HVAC Controls AC Timers 5 years Programmable Thermostat 10 years Note 1: For measures shown in Table 1 where there is a single value specified, the value applies to both new and retrofit pr...
AI summary The text provides information on the expected lifespans of various energy efficiency measures, such as tank temperature turn-down, HVAC controls, and programmable thermostats, with some noting the need for further research. It also references a report by GDS Associates, Inc., and a document titled 'NS Power IR-41 Attachment 1'.
Table 2 - Commercial & Industrial Measures Measure Life Measure Retrofit New Lighting Bulb - CFL screw base [Note 1] 5 years [Note 2] N/A Fluorescent Fixture 13 years 15 years Hardwired CFL 13 years 15 years LED Exit Signs 13 years 15 year...
AI summary Table 2 outlines the life spans for various commercial and industrial energy efficiency measures, including lighting, lighting controls, HVAC systems, and HVAC controls. The table distinguishes between retrofit and new measures, providing estimated lifespans for different components such as bulbs, fixtures, sensors, and thermostats.
Introduction and Results Page 1-4 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 36 II. METHODOLOGY The measure life values presented in this report were developed to meet the following conditions: • Satisfy any ISO-NE re...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used to develop measure life values for energy efficiency programs in New England, ensuring compliance with ISO-NE requirements and alignment with FCM standards. Activities include data collection, review and analysis, and the development of proposed draft and final default measure life values.
specific 6.4 years - 3.4 hours/day 8000 hours (NH Retail Sales) 8.1 years - 3.4 hours/day 10,000 hours (NH Retail Catalog) This measure life requires knowledge of the rated bulb life and site specific daily burn time, and consideration of...
AI summary The text provides specific bulb life calculations based on rated bulb life, annual burn time, and measure persistence, with examples from various states and programs. It includes default values and ranges for different locations and programs.
8.6 years - NH: Energy Star Homes Program) 9 years - MA, RI 13 years - retrofit Exit Sign - LED (multifamily 15 years - new Per commercial/industrial sector values documentation installations) construction 20 years - CT, NH Interior Fixtur...
AI summary The text outlines the estimated lifespans of various lighting fixtures, including LED exit signs, CFL hardwired interior and exterior fixtures, and CFL table lamps and torchieres, across different states and programs such as Energy Star Homes and CALMAC.
18 years - MA, RI: Heat Pump Retrofit, Central AC 18 years - NH, VT: Retrofit Central AC 19 years - CT: Heat Pump, Central AC Heating & Cooling System 18 years 20 years - MA, RI, VT: Furnace, Burner Replacement Replacement 25 years - VT: C...
AI summary The text outlines the lifespan and replacement intervals for various heating, cooling, and hot water systems in different regions, including heat pumps, central AC units, furnaces, and burners. It also mentions the ES Homes Program and related maintenance and commissioning requirements.
repair/tune-up/recharge 5 years - NH: for weatherization program 12 years - MA, RI, NH Room/Window AC replacement 12 years 13 years - VT, CT, NH - Energy Star Program 12 years - VT TRM, 11,15 years CALMAC Residential HVAC Controls AC Timer...
AI summary The text outlines the lifespan of various residential HVAC and energy efficiency measures, including repair/tune-up/recharge, AC replacement, and thermostats, with varying lifespans across different states and programs. It also references a document filed by GDS Associates, Inc., and includes a section on residential ventilation and other measures.
Table A-3 Residential Ventilation and Other Measures Measure Measure Life Comments Fans - whole house 25 years 25 years - MA, RI Attic Ventilation Fan 19 years 19 years - CT, NH (New Construction) (thermostatically controlled) 20 years - C...
AI summary Table A-3 outlines the lifespans of various residential ventilation and energy efficiency measures, including whole house fans, attic ventilation fans, duct sealing, air sealing, insulation, weatherization, duct insulation, and windows, with varying lifespans based on location and specific conditions.
ndows - low SHGC, or high 25 years 20 years - MA, RI performance 25 years - CALMAC, 35 years VT TPS Retrofit, 20 yrs DEER Retrofit Dehumidifier 12 years 12 years - MA, RI, CT-07 15 years - CALMAC, DEER 20 years - CT - Low Income Pipe Wrap...
AI summary The document outlines the performance and lifespan of various energy efficiency measures, including windows, dehumidifiers, pipe wrap, and tank temperature turn-down systems, with varying lifespans depending on location and program. It also references a table detailing commercial and industrial lighting measures and their lifespans.
cial & Industrial Lighting Measure Measure Life Comments Retrofit New
AI summary The text outlines a table with columns for 'Measure', 'Measure Life', and 'Comments', focusing on 'Commercial & Industrial Lighting' and listing 'Retrofit' and 'New' as options under 'Measure Life'. The context suggests the table is related to energy efficiency or lighting programs.
5 years - CT 3.4 years - VT (based on 9.6 hours/day 12,000 hours where Bulb - CFL screw base 5 years N/A higher bulb life is due to less cycling for a commercial [Note 1] [Note 2] application) 6 years - MA, RI, NH (mostly small business ap...
AI summary The text provides estimated lifespans for various lighting products, including bulbs, fixtures, and controls, across different jurisdictions and applications, such as commercial and industrial settings. Lifespans vary based on usage, location, and product type.
New: 15 years (MA, RI, NH, VT) Commercial & Industrial Lighting Controls 9 years (retrofit) - MA, RI, NH 10 years (new) - MA, RI, NH Occupancy Sensors 9 years 10 years 10 years (retrofit and new) - VT 15 years (new) - CT 8, 10 years - CALM...
AI summary The text provides information on the lifespan of various lighting control measures, including occupancy sensors and daylight dimming, across different states and regions. It includes notes on the primary source of the data and mentions that some measures are not included in the study or require further research.
Table A-5 Commercial & Industrial HVAC Measure Measure Life Comments Retrofit New 15 years - MA, RI, NH, CT (new - water and ground source heat pump, CT-07) Packaged AC/HP N/A 15 years 12 years - CT (new - air source heat pump) 15 years -...
AI summary Table A-5 outlines the measure life for commercial and industrial HVAC systems, including Packaged AC/HP, Chillers, and Enthalpy Economizers, with varying lifespans based on location and type, such as new versus retrofit systems and different states or organizations.
new) - adj from 14 years engineering life VT [Note 2] TRM, 14 years VEIC 15 years - DEER Commercial & Industrial HVAC Controls 8 years - MA, RI, NH (retrofit) Programmable Thermostat 8 years N/A 10 years - VT (retrofit) 5 years - VT TPS 10...
AI summary The text provides information on the engineering life spans of various energy efficiency technologies and equipment, including HVAC controls, programmable thermostats, energy management systems, and motors, with varying lifespans across different regions and contexts.
17 years - CT (new) 15 years - CALMAC, DEER (new) Primary Source: Measure Life Study, prepared for The Massachusetts Joint Utilities by ERS, 10/10/05 Note 1: Value = 20 years in ERS 10/10/05 Measure Life Study Note 2: Value = "N/A" in ERS...
AI summary The text presents data on residential energy efficiency programs, including sources like National Grid, Efficiency Maine, and Connecticut programs, along with references to studies and documentation from 2005 to 2007 that provide insights into program savings and lifetimes.
prepared for California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, CA. Efficiency Vermont Efficiency Vermont TRM Users Manual 2006-41 Commercial & Industrial Sources Utility Primary Source National Grid Measure Life Study, prepared for Th...
AI summary The text references documents and studies related to energy efficiency programs, including Measure Life Studies and TRM User Manuals, prepared for various utility companies and regulatory bodies in the United States.
ERS, 11/17/05, p. 1-4. Connecticut - UI and CLP -2007 Connecticut - UI and CLP Programs Savings Documentation - 2007 Table 1.4 Commercial and Industrial Lifetimes Page 222 Study Primary Source CALMAC Public Workshops CALMAC Public Workshop...
AI summary The text includes references to various energy efficiency studies and programs, including CALMAC Public Workshops, a Vermont Technical Potential Study, and Efficiency Vermont's TRM Users Manual. It also references a document from NS Power dated March 29, 2019, discussing targeted measures and preliminary measure life value data for residential and commercial and industrial end use equipment.
Current Value (in Years, or Hours if indicated) Basis and Documentation Source(s) May Vary by: Retail Store (RS), Retail Catalog (RC), Residential Measures Basis: Equipment Life (EL) or EL and Measure Persistence (EL&MP) Installed, Multifa...
AI summary The text provides information on the current value and lifespan of residential interior lighting measures, including factors such as equipment life and measure persistence. It references data sources like manufacturer information and studies, and notes variations in lighting lifespans based on usage and installation type.
VEIC 6.4 New Construction: EL(=6.4; based on 1,102 operating hrs/yr) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed LI SF MF: EL(daily burn time presented in "CFL Life by Daily Burn Time" table on p. 203 of VT TRM allows for variation in lifeti...
AI summary The text discusses the estimated lifespan and operating hours for CFL bulbs in different settings, including new construction and residential use, with references to various sources and assumptions made for calculations.
s at 3.4 hours/day; PSNH RS EL=6.4 8,000 hours at 3.4 hours/day; RC 8.1; RS 6.4; 8.6 ES Homes New Const EL=8.6 for Energy Star Homes Program EL(=6 [22]; 7.2 [19]; 9 [20] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources reference...
AI summary The text provides energy usage data and efficiency metrics for various lighting and energy programs, including LED exit signs, CFL fixtures, and Energy Star Homes Program. It references multiple entities and studies with varying efficiency levels and persistence values.
ms [17] CT-07 20 [16] Fixture - CFL EL, manufacturer data and stipulated values, 10.87 for homes withouth CFL installation, 12.08 for VT TPS 10.87 - 12.08 homes with partial CFL installation [23] EL(=16) [37] [38] & MP(persistence value no...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures, specifically focusing on the use of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in residential and commercial settings, including their energy savings, persistence values, and associated programs such as Home Energy Solutions and Home Energy Assistance Programs.
numerous persistence and retention studies) NG 20 EL and Measure Persistence EL(=6 [22]; 7.2 [19]; 9 [20] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced Fixture - CFL integral CALMAC 6; 7.2; 9 included numerous pers...
AI summary The text presents data on the persistence and retention of various light fixtures, including CFL integral, modular, and table lamp models. It includes values from different sources such as CALMAC, DEER, NG, and VEIC, along with references to studies and operating hours for each type of fixture.
FL table lamp CT 8 LI, SF, MF EL (=8 years; operating hours 3.2 hours/day [7]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0); no source listed PSNH 10 Energy Star Lighting Program [17] DEER 16 EL(=16) [6] [29] [34] NG 5 EL and Measure Persistence EL(=16 [37] [3...
AI summary The text provides data on the expected lifetime (EL) and measure persistence (MP) for various lighting fixtures, including table lamps and CFLs, with references to different studies, programs, and technical documents. It includes information from organizations such as PSNH, DEER, and VEIC.
EL(=10, based on lamp life of 6.26 yrs and ballast life of 32.88 yrs from "Component Costs and VEIC 10 Lifetimes Used in Computing O&M Savings Residential Applications" table on p. 306 of VT TRM, and annual usage of 3.4 hrs/day) & MP(assum...
AI summary The text provides details on the expected lifespan and operating hours for various lighting fixtures, including CFL torchiere, based on data from multiple sources such as the VT TRM, VEIC, and studies referenced in the document. These values are used in computing O&M savings for residential applications.
M a more accurate lifetime can be found based on daily burn time of the fixture) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Fixture - Common Area NG 20 EL and Measure Persistence Fixture - Flood NG 20 EL and Measure Persistence NG 20 EL and Measure Persisten...
AI summary The text discusses fixture lifetimes based on daily burn time and mentions a persistence factor (MP) assumed to be 1.0, with specific references to fixture types and associated metrics.
New Construction: EL(=20; operating hrs are 1,102/yr) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed LI MF: EL(=20 [41] [42], rated lifetime of most ballasts is 40,000 hrs and most CFL bulbs is 10,000 hrs; using Table A on p. 207 of VT TRM a mo...
AI summary The text discusses the estimated lifetimes and operating hours for various lighting fixtures, particularly fluorescent ones, in different residential and multifamily settings. It references the Vermont Technical Reference Manual (VT TRM) and other sources to determine energy efficiency and cost-saving estimates for lighting components.
EL(=17 [20] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC 17 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=11 [39]; 15 [37]; 16 [38]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenc...
AI summary The text provides data on the energy efficiency of various lighting fixtures, including HID High Pressure Sodium (HPS) and HID Metal Halide (MH) lamps, along with their persistence values and references to studies and technical documents such as the VT TRM.
etime can be found based on daily burn time of the fixture) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Fixture - Med Cabinet NG 20 EL and Measure Persistence Fixture - Sconce NG 20 EL and Measure Persistence Floor Lamp VEIC 10 Ceiling Fan w/ Energy Star Ligh...
AI summary The text provides details on various lighting fixtures and their energy efficiency, including measure persistence values and energy usage calculations based on different assumptions and sources such as VT TRM and CALMAC.
9 EL and Measure Persistence PSNH 8.1 EL=8.1 10,000 hours at 3.4 hours/day Retrofit: New Construction: EL(=3.9; based on 2,190 operating hrs/yr or 6 hrs/day assumed usage [52]) & VEIC 3.9 MP(assumed to be 1.0) Bulb - CFL LI SF MF: EL(daily...
AI summary The text discusses energy lifetime (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values for compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) across different entities such as PSNH, VEIC, and CALMAC, with varying assumptions and data sources for EL and MP.
Sku 9.4; 9.4-16 EL(=9.4 based on 8,000 hr manufacturer rated life & average operating hrs of 2.34/day [40]; 9.4-16 [38]) NG 15 EL and Measure Persistence EL (=20 years; operating hours 3.2 hours/day [7] for general exterior lighting and 12...
AI summary The text presents data on lighting fixtures and their energy efficiency, including manufacturer-rated life, operating hours, and measure persistence values from various sources. It includes references to different entities and studies, such as CALMAC and NG, and provides specific figures for different lighting types and regions.
[19]; 9 [20] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced Fixture - CFL integral CALMAC 6; 7.2; 9 included numerous persistence and retention studies) DEER 7.1 EL(=7.1) [6] [32] NG 15 EL and Measure Persistence EL...
AI summary The text references various persistence and retention studies related to compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) and their performance in different fixture types, including integral, modular, and unspecified fixtures. Multiple sources such as CALMAC, DEER, NG, and PSNH are cited with varying persistence values and studies referenced.
ure - CFL unspecified numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=20 [41] [42], rated lifetime of most ballasts is 40,000 hrs and most CFL bulbs is 10,000 hrs; using VT TRM LI MF: 20 Table A on p. 207 of VT TRM a more accurate lifetime...
AI summary The text discusses the rated lifetimes of various lighting fixtures and bulbs, referencing studies on persistence and retention. It includes data on ballasts, CFL bulbs, and different fixture types with their respective lifetimes and persistence values.
1; 15; 16 included numerous persistence and retention studies) NG 15 EL and Measure Persistence EL(=20; operating hrs are 2,920/yr) Fixture - HID HPS; HID MH VEIC 20 & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed DEER 16 - EL(=16) [33] Fixture...
AI summary The document contains technical data on energy efficiency measures, including persistence and retention studies for various lighting fixtures and electronic ballasts. It references multiple studies and sources, including DEER, NG, and CALMAC, and includes efficiency levels (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values.
ue not specified, however sources referenced dimming) Sku 10; 11; 16 included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=16 [20] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Lighting - RCP CALMAC 16...
AI summary The text discusses persistence and retention studies related to various energy efficiency measures, including lighting, ballasts, occupancy sensors, and controls. Specific measures and their associated efficiency values and sources are listed.
LI SF: 10 EL(=10 [42]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Exterior Motion Sensor VT TRM - 15 EL(=15 [51]; based on 650 reduced operating hrs/yr) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) GDS Associates, Inc. Appendix C Page C-3 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-4...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency measures, including exterior motion sensors, with associated energy savings and measure persistence assumptions. It references the VT TRM and includes a filing date and page reference from NS Power's IR-41 Attachment 1.
e [1] VEIC 20 Furnace replacement DEER 18 EL(=18) [34] EL(=18 [37] [39]; 20 [38]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Sku 18; 20 18; 20 numerous persistence and retention studies) NG 18 EL and Measure...
AI summary The text presents data on furnace and heat pump replacement programs, including efficiency levels (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values. It references various studies and sources, such as DEER, NG, CT-07, and CALMAC, which are used to determine efficiency and persistence metrics for different products and programs.
Sku 15 numerous persistence and retention studies) Heating System replacement NG 20 EL and Measure Persistence [1] Heating System repair/service NG 5 HP flow/charge NG 18 EL and Measure Persistence [2] NG 25 EL and Measure Persistence [3]...
AI summary The text presents various energy efficiency measures with associated costs, including heating system replacement, repair, and pipe wrap, along with persistence and retention values from multiple sources such as EL, MP, CALMAC, DEER, and VT TPS. These values are used for evaluating the long-term effectiveness of the measures.
Retrofit: EL(=10 [41]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) 10 13 New Construction: EL(=13, average life of water heater) VT TRM LI SF: 10 LI SF: 10 & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed LI SF: EL(=10) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed VEIC...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency measures, including retrofit and new construction, with associated efficiency levels (EL) and measure persistence (MP) assumptions, referencing various technical documents and sources.
LI SF: 4 Tank Temperature Turn-Down LI SF: EL(=4) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed CT 5 LI EL (=5 years since the water heater is not a new one and it will have a limited life, page 181 [1]) Shell Heating Savings VEIC 25 EL(=25 [4...
AI summary The text presents various efficiency measures and their associated energy savings, including tank temperature turn-down, shell heating savings, and efficient space heating using oil, LP boilers, and space heaters. Efficiency values and measure persistence are provided, though some sources are not listed.
VEIC 25 Hot Water Fuel Switch-Oil-Water Heater VEIC 10 EL(=10 [48]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0)
AI summary The text references a Hot Water Fuel Switch-Oil-Water Heater under the VEIC program, indicating an efficiency measure with an estimated impact of 10 and a measure persistence assumed to be 1.0.
Hot Water Fuel Switch-Oil-(or NG or LP or VEIC 15 EL(=15 [48]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Kero) Storage Tank & Instantaneous Hot Water Fuel Switch-NG-(or LP) Water VEIC 13 EL(=13 [48]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Heater Waterbed Insulation NH 10...
AI summary The text lists various water heating technologies with associated energy efficiency (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values, citing multiple organizations such as DEER, VT TPS, and PSNH, along with references to studies and programs like the Energy Star Homes Program.
PSNH 13 Energy Star Homes Progam [17] Water Heater VT TPS 13 EL [27] VT TPS 18 EL, stipulated values [24] Furnace Fan Motor VT TRM 18 18 EL(=18 [45]; operating hrs are 375/yr [44] [46]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Furnace Replacement VT TRM 20...
AI summary The text includes a table with energy-related programs and technical details from a regulatory proceeding, referencing Energy Star Homes, water heater, furnace fan motor, and furnace replacement. It also includes a filing date and document reference related to Nova Scotia Power and IR-41.
EL(=18 [18] [19] [20] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC 18 numerous persistence and retention studies) VT TPS 18 EL, market driven [4] EL(=15 [38]; 18 [37] [39]) & MP(persistence value n...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values for various programs and studies, referencing multiple organizations and studies such as CALMAC, VT TPS, and DEER, with persistence values and studies cited for different cooling systems and measures.
] EL(=15 [37] [38] [39]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Sku 15 numerous persistence and retention studies) NG 18 EL and Measure Persistence [2] CT-07 5 AC System Tune-up [16] Refrigerant Charge PS...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency measures, including persistence values and retention studies, with references to various programs and organizations. It includes details on EL (Energy Lifetime) and MP (Measure Persistence) for different measures and sources.
, however sources referenced included CALMAC 11; 15 numerous persistence and retention studies) VT TPS 12 EL, market driven [4] VT TRM LI MF: 10 EL(=10, based on 500 operating hrs/yr [44]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no sources listed Shell C...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures along with their associated energy savings and persistence values, referencing multiple studies and organizations such as CALMAC, VT TPS, and VEIC. Persistence and retention studies are frequently cited, and some entries lack specified sources for persistence values.
25 EL and Measure Persistence [3] Fans - whole house - 10 VT TRM EL(=10; based on operating hrs of 2,817/yr [43]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) LI MF: 10 LI MF: 10 NG 25 EL and Measure Persistence [3] VEIC 20 EL(=20) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency measures and their associated energy savings (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values, citing various sources and organizations. It includes data on fan installations, insulation, and references to studies and programs from different entities.
T TRM LI MF: 25 EL(=25) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no sources listed PSNH 19 Energy Star Homes Progam [17] Ventilation Fan VEIC 10 EL(=25 [18] [19] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Insulation (c...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency measures, including insulation, ventilation fans, and HVAC controls, along with associated costs and persistence values. It references various organizations and programs, such as PSNH, CALMAC, and NG, and includes citations for sources and studies.
Current Value (in Years, or Hours if indicated) Basis and Documentation Source(s) May Vary by: Retail Store (RS), Retail Catalog (RC), Residential Measures Basis: Equipment Life (EL) or EL and Measure Persistence (EL&MP) Installed, Multifa...
AI summary This document provides information on the current value of residential energy efficiency measures, including equipment life and measure persistence, with references to various studies and sources. It includes data on AC or HP commissioning, AC/heat pump efficiency, and other measures.
19 [16] DEER 15 EL(=15) [34] NG 15 EL and Measure Persistence [3] Air Sealing VEIC 20 EL(=20) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed PSNH 15 NG 12 EL and Measure Persistence [4] Dehumidifier CT-07 12 [16] Duct Insulation - heating/cooli...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures, including air sealing, dehumidifiers, duct insulation, and duct sealing, with associated costs, energy savings (EL), measure persistence (MP), and other relevant details. It includes information from various organizations and sources, such as VEIC, DEER, and NG, along with assumptions and references.
CT 25 SF, MF; 20 LI LI EL (=20 years) SF, MF EL (=25 years) & MP(assumed to be 1.0); no source listed VT TRM 15 - EL(=15) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed Duct Sealing - cooling NG 15 EL and Measure Persistence [3] NG 18 EL and Me...
AI summary The text presents various energy efficiency measures, their expected lifespans, and associated measure persistence values, sourced from different entities like VT TRM, DEER, NG, and PSNH. It includes details on duct sealing, refrigerant charge, and weatherization with varying assumptions and references.
L and Measure Persistence [1] shows measure life of 35 adjusted to 20 for MA common assumptions. PSNH 25 Windows - low SHGC, or high performance EL(=20 [20]; 25 [19] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced in...
AI summary The text provides a table with measure persistence and efficiency values for various energy efficiency measures, including windows, AC tuneups, caulking, and others, citing different sources and organizations.
ified, however sources referenced included AC (w/integrated water heating) CALMAC 15 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=18 [18] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Advanced HVAC tune...
AI summary The text references various HVAC-related measures and their persistence values, citing studies and sources from CALMAC. It includes details on advanced and basic HVAC tune-ups and diagnostics, along with associated persistence values and studies referenced.
EL(=20 [20]; 25 [18] [19] [22]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced CALMAC 20; 25 included numerous persistence and retention studies) Duct Testing (and sealing) EL(=15 [38]; 18 [37]; 25 [39]) & MP(persistence...
AI summary The text references various energy efficiency measures, including duct testing, HVAC/Refrigeration, and low flow showerheads, along with persistence and retention studies. It cites organizations such as CALMAC and DEER and mentions persistence values for different programs.
numerous persistence and retention studies) Low Flow Showerhead DEER 10 - EL(=10) [31] [34] [35] 9 9 VT TRM EL(=9 [41]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) LI SF MF: 9 LI SF MF: 9 Room AC (turn-in) VT TPS 6 EL, turn-in measure so measure life divided...
AI summary The text presents data on measure persistence and retention for various energy efficiency programs, including low flow showerheads, room AC units, windows with sunscreen, and high efficiency ducts. It references studies and technical reference manuals such as DEER and VT TRM, and includes measure life values and assumptions about persistence.
Residential Data Sources Utility/Study Detail [1] B/C Screening Results for Regional Natural Gas Energy Efficiency Programs prepared by GDS for Gas NG Networks, March 25, 2004, page C-17. NG [2] Harvey Sachs study, Jan. 2003, p. 11. NG [3]...
AI summary The document lists various residential data sources and studies related to energy efficiency programs, including reports from GDS, Kema Inc., and evaluations by RLW Analytics and Nexus Market Research, focusing on lighting and fixture savings calculations.
Smith, 2003 [46] VEIC experience in other states suggest that ARI estimates for AC tend to be overstated; to compensate, VT TRM EVT applied a 0.75 multiplier VT TRM [47] Vermont State Cost Effectiveness Screening Tool VT TRM [48] EVT estim...
AI summary The text references VEIC's experience with ARI estimates for AC, noting they may be overstated and adjusted with a 0.75 multiplier. It also mentions the use of the Vermont State Cost Effectiveness Screening Tool and other sources for estimating equipment life and measure persistence.
Measure Persistence Utility/Study Retrofit New Construction Sources: Manufacturer's data, studies, stipulated values, etc.
AI summary The text introduces the concept of Measure Persistence, which refers to the longevity and effectiveness of energy efficiency measures in both retrofit and new construction contexts. It outlines that data sources for persistence include manufacturer data, studies, and stipulated values.
Lighting NG 13 15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] VEIC 3.4 PSNH 13 15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] CT-07 13 15 [48] Fluorescent EL(=16 [4] [5] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC 16 numero...
AI summary The text provides data on lighting efficiency and measure persistence, including values from various organizations and studies. It references efficiency levels (EL) and measure persistence (MP) for different lighting technologies and sources, such as fluorescent lighting and studies by CALMAC and VEIC.
VT TPS 10 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [9] DEER 16 EL(=16) [19] [20] NG 13 15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] EL(=15; operating hours are collected from prescriptive application form or default of 3,338 hrs VEIC 15 is used [45]) HID PS...
AI summary The text presents data related to energy efficiency measures, including HID lamps, T8 fixtures with electronic ballasts, and electronic ballasts, along with references to studies, manufacturer data, and operating hours. It includes information from various entities and sources such as DEER, NG, VEIC, and CT-07.
EL(=10 [5]; 16 [4] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced dimming) CALMAC 10; 16 included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(operating hrs based on type of signal from page 67 of VT TRM [46]) & MP...
AI summary The text discusses the persistence and retention of energy efficiency measures, specifically LED traffic and pedestrian signals, referencing studies from CALMAC and the VT TRM. It includes assumptions about operating hours and measure persistence.
Metal Hallide track VEIC 15 EL(=15; operating hours are collected from prescriptive application form or from "operating hours by building type" table on page 73 of VT TRM [44]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Metal Halide (MH) DEER 16 - EL(=16) [1...
AI summary The text provides information on lighting efficiency measures, including Metal Halide (MH) track lighting, with details on energy usage (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values. It references various sources, including the Vermont Technical Reference Manual (VT TRM) and studies on persistence and retention.
Exit Signs (CFL hardwire kit, LED, or EL(=15 [5]; 16 [4] [6] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced CALMAC electroluminescent) 15; 16 included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=0.6 [4] [8]) & MP...
AI summary The text provides data on the rated lifetimes and persistence values of various types of lighting technologies, including exit signs, halogen lamps, and HID fixtures, citing sources such as CALMAC and the VT TRM. It also references persistence and retention studies.
CALMAC SPC Lighting 16 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=16 [4] [5] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Electronic Ballast (for display case) 16 numerous persistence and reten...
AI summary The text provides a list of lighting products with associated energy efficiency (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values, along with references to studies and data sources. It includes details such as product names, manufacturers, and specific efficiency metrics.
Current Value (in Years, or Basis and Documentation Source(s) C&I Measures Hours if indicated) Basis = Equipment Life Only or EL and Measure Persistence Sources: Manufacturer's data, studies, stipulated values, etc. Utility/Study Retrofit...
AI summary The text presents data on the current value and lifespan of integral compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in various settings, including education, grocery, and healthcare facilities, with sources cited as DEER studies and manufacturer data.
] Integral CFL (Health/Medical - DEER Hospital) 0.9 EL(=0.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Health/Medical - Nursing DEER Home) 0.9 EL(=0.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Lodging - Hotel) DEER 0.9 EL(=0.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Lodging - Motel) DEER...
AI summary The text lists various applications of Integral CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lamp) across different sectors, including health/medical, lodging, manufacturing, office, restaurant, and retail, with corresponding energy efficiency values and references to DEER and other citations.
.9 EL(=1.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Retail - Single-Story DEER Large) 1.8 EL(=1.8) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Retail - Small) DEER 2.1 EL(=2.1) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Storage - Conditioned) DEER 2.8 EL(=2.8) [33] [35] DEER Integral CFL (Stor...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures, specifically focusing on the efficacy of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in various settings such as retail, storage, and warehouses, with associated efficiency values and references to studies on persistence and retention.
10; 11; 16 referenced included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=5 [17] [36]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Fluorescent Lamps Sku numerous persistence and retention studies) 5 GDS A...
AI summary The text references persistence and retention studies related to fluorescent lamps and includes references to various entities and studies. It also mentions GDS Associates, Inc. and is part of an attachment to a document filed by NS Power on March 29, 2019.
VT TRM differ according to prescriptive application form or from reference tables on page 78 of VT TRM 10,000 hrs (rated) [44]) & MP(assumed to be 1.0) Sku CFL Bulb (Education - Primary School) 5.56 EL(=5.56 based on 1,440 operating hrs) [...
AI summary The document provides data on the energy efficiency of CFL bulbs in various settings, including education, healthcare, and lodging, with specific values and operating hours referenced from the VT TRM.
Sku 0.92 EL(=0.92 based on 8,736 operating hrs) [37] CFL Bulb (Lodging - Motel) Sku 0.92 EL(=0.92 based on 8,736 operating hrs) [37] CFL Bulb (Lodging - Guest Rooms) Sku 6.99 EL(=6.99 based on 1,145 operating hrs) [37] CFL Bulb (Manufactur...
AI summary The text provides a list of CFL bulbs with corresponding SKU numbers and energy load factors (EL) based on operating hours. Each entry includes a specific application context, such as lodging, manufacturing, office, and retail, along with the associated EL values and operating hours.
Sku 2.8 EL(=2.8 based on 2,860 operating hrs) [37] CFL Bulb (Storage - Unconditioned) Sku 2.8 EL(=2.8 based on 2,860 operating hrs) [37] CFL Bulb (Warehouse - Refrigerated) Sku 3.08 EL(=3.08 based on 2,600 operating hrs) [37] Dairy Farm Ha...
AI summary The text provides a list of various lighting fixtures and their associated energy efficiency metrics, including operating hours, energy usage, and measure persistence assumptions, referencing the Vermont Technical Reference Manual (VT TRM) and other data sources.
[48] PSNH 9 10 EL and Measure Persistence [1] EL(=8 [4] [6] [8]; 10 [5]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced CALMAC 8; 10 included numerous persistence and retention studies) VT TPS 10 EL&MP, manufacturer data,...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values for various programs and entities, including PSNH, CALMAC, VT TPS, NG, VEIC, CT-07, and DEER. Persistence values are derived from studies, manufacturer data, and application forms, with some values assumed or unspecified.
EL(=16) [32] EL(=8 [4] [8]; 10 [5]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced CALMAC Photocell 8; 10 included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=8 [4] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however s...
AI summary The text discusses persistence and retention studies related to various lighting controls and systems, including photocells, timeclocks, lighting controls, and daylighting controls, with references to CALMAC, DEER, and VT TPS. It notes that persistence values are not specified but that studies have been referenced.
Current Value (in Years, or Basis and Documentation Source(s) C&I Measures Hours if indicated) Basis = Equipment Life Only or EL and Measure Persistence Sources: Manufacturer's data, studies, stipulated values, etc. Utility/Study Retrofit...
AI summary The document provides a table with information on the current value, basis, and documentation sources for various energy efficiency measures, including HVAC and Packaged AC/HP. It includes data from different studies and utilities, along with equipment life and measure persistence details.
ure Persistence [1] CT-07 13 15 [48] EL(=15; operating hours are 800 cooling full load hours and 1600-2200 heating full load hours VT TRM 15 according to page 37 in VT TRM) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed NG 20 EL and Measure Per...
AI summary The text provides data on equipment efficiency, operating hours, and measure persistence, referencing various sources such as the VT TRM and manufacturer data. It includes details on cooling and heating full load hours, as well as equipment lifespans for chillers and other systems.
10 [48] VT TPS - 25 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [9] DEER - 20 EL(=20) [32] CT-07 10 15 [48] VEIC 14 VT TPS 7 EL(=10 without MP, 7 with MP) &MP(=0.7), manufacturer data, studies [9] Enthalpy Economizer DEER 15 EL(=15) [30] [31] EL(=9....
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures, including Enthalpy Economizers, Custom HVAC Equipment, and Unitary systems, with associated energy savings and measure persistence. It references various programs and studies, such as DEER and VT TPS, and includes data from manufacturers and studies.
pump from Table 2.0.0 page 233 [3]); no source CT 14 listed EL (=14 years Unitary HVAC, =15 Air Handling Units installation; Operating Hours are site Ventilation CO2 Controls CT 14; 15 specific); no source listed EL(=16 [4] [8]) & MP(persi...
AI summary The text references various energy efficiency and management programs, including heat exchangers, ventilation CO2 controls, and AC systems, with associated persistence values and studies. It also mentions CT-07 and CALMAC, and lists operating hours and installation details for specific equipment.
19.5; 20 included numerous persistence and retention studies) CT-07 13 15 [48] EL(=15 [5] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Cooling Tower/Evap Condenser 15 numerous persistence and retent...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures with persistence and retention values, including studies referenced by CALMAC for various technologies such as cooling towers, furnaces, and window glazing.
numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=20 [4] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Insulation 20 numerous persistence and retention studies) CT-07 10 [48] Reflective Window Film/Win...
AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency measures, including insulation, reflective window film, heat pumps, and packaged HVAC systems, with associated effectiveness (EL) and persistence (MP) values. It references studies and organizations such as CALMAC and CT-07, highlighting persistence and retention data.
included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=20 [4] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Chillers (water-cooled) 20 numerous persistence and retention studies) CT-07 13 15 [48] E...
AI summary The document references persistence and retention studies related to various energy efficiency measures, including chillers, evaporative coolers, HVAC/refrigeration systems, and AC units, with specific values and sources cited by organizations such as CALMAC and CT-07.
dies) EL(=15 [7] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC 15 numerous persistence and retention studies) Water Heater (gas) DEER - 13 or 15 EL(=13 for lower efficiencies less than 70%, and 15 fo...
AI summary The document outlines persistence values and energy efficiency metrics for various heating and cooling equipment, including water heaters, boilers, central AC units, and heat pumps. These values are sourced from studies, manufacturer data, and programs like EL&MP and DEER.
15 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [12] Heat Pump (hydronic) VT TPS 20 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [13] CT-07 20 [48] Solar Water Heating System VT TPS 15 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [14] CT-07 15 [48] Heat Recovery VT TPS 23...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency programs and technologies with associated data sources and studies, including heat pumps, solar water heating systems, and heat recovery systems. It references multiple organizations and studies, but no explicit arguments or positions are made.
Water Heater (heat pump) DEER - 10 EL(=10) [32] Low Flow Aerators DEER 9 - EL(=9) [29] Low Flow Showerheads DEER 10 - EL(=10) [32] Pipe Wrap DEER 15 EL(=15) [32] VAV Variable Speed Drive CT-07 13 15 [48] VAV System Components Ventilation o...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures and their associated programs, including heat pump water heaters, low flow aerators, insulation, and window upgrades. Each entry includes program names, efficiency levels, and references to studies or data sources.
le pane low-e) VT TPS 30 EL&MP, manufacturer data, studies [12] Chilled or Hot Water Loop Pump DEER (variable flow or w/VSD 10 EL(=10) [23] Indirect Evap Cooling (central or DEER packaged system) 15 EL(=15) [32] Heat Exchanger (air to air)...
AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency measures and their associated energy savings, including low-e windows, chilled or hot water loop pumps, indirect evaporation cooling systems, and heat exchangers. Each measure is linked to a program (DEER, VT TRM, EL&MP) and includes details on energy savings and sources.
VT TRM (stand-alone oil) 10 EL(=10) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed Hot Water Heater VT TRM (stand-alone gas) 13 EL(=13) & MP(assumed to be 1.0), no source listed Hot Water Heater VT TRM (stand-alone kerosene) 15 EL(=15) & MP(ass...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures with their corresponding VT TRM and CT-07 values, including hot water heaters, boilers, furnaces, and envelope measures, along with associated energy and measure performance (EL & MP) values, some of which are assumed and lack sources.
48] Movable Window Insulation CT-07 10 [48] Roof Spray Cooling CT-07 15 [48] Plenum/Attic Insulation CT-07 14 [48] Plate/Heat Pipe Type Heat Recovery CT-07 System 18 [48] Rotary Type Heat Recovery System CT-07 14 [48] Economizer -Air/Water...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures with associated CT-07 codes and costs, including movable window insulation, roof spray cooling, and heat recovery systems. These items are part of a document from GDS Associates, Inc., filed in a regulatory proceeding related to NS Power.
Current Value (in Years, or Basis and Documentation Source(s) C&I Measures Hours if indicated) Basis = Equipment Life Only or EL and Measure Persistence Sources: Manufacturer's data, studies, stipulated values, etc. Utility/Study Retrofit...
AI summary The document outlines the current value and documentation sources for various energy efficiency measures, including HVAC controls and programmable thermostats, with details on equipment life and measure persistence based on manufacturer data, studies, and stipulated values.
(Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1] CT-07 15 [48] EMS EL(=15 [5] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC 15 numerous persistence and retention studies) VT TPS 10 EL&MP, manufac...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency measures and their persistence values, referencing various studies, manufacturers, and programs. It includes details on specific technologies such as dual enthalpy economizer controls and hotel occupancy sensors, along with their expected lifespans and sources of information.
EL and Measure Persistence [2] EL(=15 [8]; 16 [4]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Bypass/Delay Timer 15; 16 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=10 [5]; 11 [4] [6] [8]) & MP(pers...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values for various energy-saving technologies, such as bypass/delay timers, set-back thermostats, and timeclocks, referencing studies conducted by CALMAC and CT-07. Persistence values are noted as not specified but with references to multiple studies.
EL(=10 [5] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC Energy Reduction 10 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=15 [7] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenc...
AI summary The document outlines various energy efficiency measures, including energy reduction, water heater controls, EMS optimization, retrocommissioning, and variable speed drive control, along with their associated persistence values and sources such as CALMAC and EL&MP. It also references studies and data from manufacturers.
Current Value (in Years, or Basis and Documentation Source(s) C&I Measures Hours if indicated) Basis = Equipment Life Only or EL and Measure Persistence Sources: Manufacturer's data, studies, stipulated values, etc. Utility/Study Retrofit...
AI summary The text presents a table of energy efficiency measures for commercial and industrial (C&I) applications, including details on equipment life, documentation sources, and associated programs such as DEER and CT-07. It outlines specific measures like timeclocks, chilled water reset, and motor controls, with their respective lifespans and documentation sources.
gy Efficient Packaged Terminal CT-07 Units 13 15 [48] Dehumidifiers CT-07 13 15 [48] Induced Draft Cooling Towers CT-07 13 15 [48] Cooling Tower Fan Pony Motor CT-07 13 15 [48] Variable Frequency Pump Drive (Solid CT-07 13 15 State) [48] Z...
AI summary The document lists various energy-efficient equipment and systems under the Conservation Technology 07 (CT-07) program, including quantities and associated costs. It includes items such as packaged terminal units, dehumidifiers, cooling towers, and energy management controls.
CT 17 EL (=17 years, Operating Hours taken from Table 2.0.0 page 233 [3]), no source listed PSNH 15 20 EL and Measure Persistence [1] CT-07 15 20 [48] EL(=15 [5] [6] [8]; 15.3 [4]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources refe...
AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency measures and their persistence, referencing various organizations like CALMAC, DEER, and CT-07, along with entities such as PSNH and VEIC. It includes data on operating hours, measure persistence, and sources cited for these values.
EL(=16 [17] [36]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Sku 16 numerous persistence and retention studies) NG 13 15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] VEIC 10 VFD on non-HVAC Fans PSNH 13 15 EL and Measure P...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency (EL) and measure persistence (MP) values for various programs and technologies, including variable frequency drives (VFD) on non-HVAC fans and chilled water pumps, referencing studies and evaluations by organizations such as PSNH, CALMAC, and VEIC.
page 22 in VT TRM [41]) PSNH 13 EL and Measure Persistence [1] EL(=16 [4]; 20 [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included CALMAC 16; 20 numerous persistence and retention studies) NG 10 (Small Retrofit On...
AI summary The text presents data on energy efficiency measures and their persistence values, including contributions from various organizations such as PSNH, NG, and VEIC, with references to studies on measure persistence and retention.
5 (Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1] VEIC 15 Vending Machine PSNH 5 (Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1] DEER 10 EL(=10) [24] [25] NG 5 (Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1] Vending Machine...
AI summary The text provides data on energy efficiency measures, including vending machine retrofits and associated energy savings, with references to various programs and organizations involved in energy efficiency initiatives.
source listed PSNH 9 10 (Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1] NG 13 15 (Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1] VEIC 13 Commercial Refrig Compressors PSNH 13 15 (Large Retrofit Only) EL and Measure Persistence [1...
AI summary The text presents data related to energy efficiency programs, including measures such as commercial refrigeration compressors, dryer efficiency, and custom process cooling and equipment. It lists entities involved and their associated numbers, highlighting efficiency and measure persistence.
rsistence [1] Custom Process Equipment PSNH 5,10,13 5,10,15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] VFD - process VEIC 10 NG 13 15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] Custom Compressed Air PSNH 13 15 EL and Measure Persistence [1] NG 13 EL and Measure P...
AI summary The text presents a table outlining various custom energy efficiency measures and their associated costs, including VFD process, compressed air, non-lighting measures, O&M projects, building shell, and comprehensive design and chiller projects, with contributions from PSNH, NG, and VEIC, and references to EL and Measure Persistence [1].
11 - 20 EL and Measure Persistence [1] Custom Comprehensive Chiller Project PSNH 11 - 20 EL and Measure Persistence [1] VFD - non process VEIC 15 Energy Star Transformers VEIC 30 Refrig Case Covers-strip curtains VEIC 4 Refrig Case Covers-...
AI summary The document lists various energy efficiency measures and their associated costs, including custom comprehensive chiller projects and energy-efficient equipment, implemented by organizations such as PSNH and VEIC. The information is part of a larger regulatory proceeding and includes an appendix and attachment from NS Power.
iled: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 1 Page 35 of 36 Current Value (in Years, or Basis and Documentation Source(s) C&I Measures Hours if indicated) Basis = Equipment Life Only or EL and Measure Persistence Sources: Manufacturer's...
AI summary The text provides information on the current value and documentation basis for C&I measures, specifically Permanent Split Capacitor Motors and ECM, with a utility/study source of VEIC and a retrofit value of 15 years.
Vending Machine Occupancy Controls CT 10 EL (=10 years); no source listed EL(=3 [7] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced included Audit CALMAC 3 numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=15 [5] [8]) &...
AI summary The document lists various energy efficiency measures with their associated energy savings (EL) and persistence values (MP), along with the organizations responsible for audits and implementations, such as CALMAC and DEER. Some entries reference studies on persistence and retention, while others lack specific sources.
CT-07 15 [48] Ambient Subcooling CT-07 15 [48] Auto Cleaning System for Condensor Tubes CT-07 10 [48] Hot Gas Bypass Defrost CT-07 10 [48] Defrost Control Optimization CT-07 10 [48] Open or Enclosed Display Cases CT-07 10 [48] Case Cover C...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency measures with associated CT-07 codes and costs, including ambient subcooling, auto cleaning systems, and refrigerated air dryers, each with assigned values and references to document [48].
pressor CT-07 13 15 [48] Refrigerated Air Dryer CT-07 13 15 [48] Measure life values may vary by type of installation (i.e., retrofit/early replacement, new construction/replace on burnout) GDS Associates, Inc. Appendix C Page C-19 Date Fi...
AI summary The document includes technical data on energy efficiency measures, such as the CT-07 conservation technology, and references a filing by GDS Associates, Inc. dated March 29, 2019, related to NS Power IR-41 Attachment 1.
Com m ercial/Industrial Data Sources Utility/Study Detail NG [1] Measure Life Study, prepared for The Massachusetts Joint Utilities by ERS, 11/17/05, p. 1-4. NG [2] Deem ed value CT [3] UI/CL&P C&LM Program Savings Docum entation -2006 CAL...
AI summary The text lists various data sources and studies related to commercial and industrial energy efficiency programs, including studies from NG, CT, CALMAC, and VTTPS, along with their respective details and references.
fit analysis conducted for solar m easures. [15] The Maxim um Achievable Cost Effective Potential for Natural Gas Energy Efficiency In the Service Territory VT TPS of PNM, M ay 2005, GDS Associates [16] CALIFO RNIA STATEW IDE COMM ERCIAL S...
AI summary The text lists various studies and reports related to energy efficiency, including studies on natural gas energy efficiency potential and evaluations of energy efficiency programs. These references are used in the analysis of solar measures and energy efficiency initiatives.
Inventory Group, May 1994 [26] "Consortium for Energy Efficiency Residential Clothes W asher Initiative, 1996", revised 2002 by the DEER Consortium for Energy Efficiency DEER [27] US DOE Technical Brief: "Dem and (Tankless or Instantaneous...
AI summary The text lists various technical references and studies related to energy efficiency and demand-side management programs, including appliance recycling, energy savings algorithms, and useful life reports. These documents are cited in the context of energy management and efficiency initiatives.
Sku [37] CFL_EUL.xls from Gary Cullen, Itron, 5/12/05 VT TRM [38] Verm ont State Screening Tool VT TRM [39] BPA Measure Life Study II, Skum atz VT TRM [40] E Source Technology Atlas Series Volum e IV, Drivepower, p.32 VT TRM [41] Persisten...
AI summary The document includes references to various studies and agreements related to energy efficiency programs, such as the Demand-side Management Program (DEER) and the Variable Time Periods System (VT TRM). It also includes a section on high-efficiency water heaters and their benefits.
NS Power IR-41 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 2 High Efficiency Water Heaters Provide Hot Water for Less Heating water accounts for approximately 15 percent of a home’s energy use. High efficiency water heaters use 10 to 50 percent less energy tha...
AI summary High efficiency water heaters can reduce energy use by 10 to 50 percent compared to standard models, helping homeowners save on utility bills. These heaters use less energy to heat water, though savings depend on factors like family size and pipe placement. Storage tank models are available with various fuel options but suffer from standby losses.
, and propane. One drawback of these units is the energy used to keep the water hot at all times, otherwise known as “standby losses.” • Demand (Tankless) Water Heaters. Water circulated through a large coil is heated only on demand using...
AI summary The text discusses various types of water heating technologies, including storage tank units, demand (tankless) water heaters, heat pump water heaters, and solar water heating. Each technology is described with its advantages and limitations, such as standby losses, hot water availability, and initial costs.
Comparison of Water Heaters High Efficiency Energy Best Expected Energy Expected Major Water Heater Savings vs. Climates Savings Over Lifetime Advantages Type Minimum Equipment Lifetime Standards High Efficiency 10%–20% Any Up to $500 8–10...
AI summary The document compares different types of water heaters, highlighting their energy savings, expected lifetime savings, and advantages. High efficiency storage, demand (tankless), heat pump, and solar with electric back-up water heaters are compared based on efficiency, climate suitability, and cost savings over time.
renewable energy source IMPORTANT WATER HEATER METRICS • First-Hour Rating (FHR). FHR measures how much hot water will be available during the busiest hour of the day. A large tank does not necessarily translate to a higher FHR. The recove...
AI summary The text discusses key metrics for water heaters, including First-Hour Rating (FHR) and Energy Factor (EF), which measure hot water availability and energy efficiency. It also highlights ENERGY STAR, a partnership promoting energy-efficient practices and products.
to achieve a common goal—protecting the environment for future generations by changing to more energy-efficient practices and products today. ENERGY STAR is the government-backed symbol for energy efficiency. It identifies new homes, build...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of energy efficiency and highlights ENERGY STAR as a government-backed symbol for energy-efficient products and practices. It also references Ecombi, a product that helps reduce running costs.
running cost. With Ecombi you make the numbers. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 2 of 16 ECOMBI ELNUR HISTORY ELNUR was founded in 1973 and since then, we have established ourselves as one of the leading European...
AI summary The text introduces ELNUR, a European company specializing in electric heating systems, highlighting its history, product quality, and global presence. It emphasizes the company's commitment to quality and sustainability through international certifications.
heating systems. ECOMBI optimises control of the energy running costs, while providing maximum comfort. This electric heating system adapts to your daily needs whatever the weather conditions. Could you ask for more? Well you can with the...
AI summary The ECOMBI smart heating system is highlighted for its ability to optimize energy costs and provide comfort by adapting to weather conditions and adjusting heat output using the ESICC module. It is described as innovative and the only system of its kind on the market.
“The future is already present with ECOMBI System” 4 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 5 of 16 EFFICIENCY IS ALL DOWN TO CONTROL The cornerstone of ECOMBI technological innovation patented by ELNUR is the dynamic...
AI summary The ECOMBI system uses advanced thermostat technology and dynamic energy management to optimize heating efficiency and reduce energy consumption. It adjusts energy charging based on temperature readings and customer comfort needs, and utilizes off-peak electricity tariffs for cost-effective heating.
5 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 6 of 16 ECOMBI ECOMBI AND THE TRADITIONAL ELECTRIC STORAGE SYSTEMS During the autumn, the cold winter and into spring, your heating system will have to deal with different tempe...
AI summary The document describes traditional electric storage systems, including static and fan-forced storage heaters, explaining their operation during off-peak hours and their benefits in terms of energy efficiency and cost savings.
customer really requires it. These storage heaters are ideal for large and open areas. If the user manages the temperature optimally, storage heaters can result in an energy saving of 25%. A Fan Forced Storage Heater will not use the compl...
AI summary The text describes how storage heaters and the Ecombi system manage energy usage and temperature control. It highlights the energy-saving potential of storage heaters and explains how the Ecombi system dynamically manages energy charging to ensure comfort while optimizing costs.
ined by our ESSIC technology. ESICC (ECOMBI Smart Input Charge Control) electronic management module assesses the energy consumption and adjusts energy charging to cover the user’s comfort needs. ECOMBI is programmed to store only the requ...
AI summary The ECOMBI system uses smart input charge control to manage energy consumption for heating, ensuring that only the required energy is used to maintain set temperatures. It adjusts energy charging during off-peak periods and can reduce energy consumption by 35%. The system allows for programming of comfort and eco temperatures on a daily and weekly basis.
7 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 8 of 16 ECOMBI GREAT BENEFITS, GREAT VIRTUES EXTREMELY USER FRIENDLY WITH JUST THREE SIMPLE STEPS The ECOMBI control panel is highly intuitive. Thanks to its user-friendly syste...
AI summary The document describes the ECOMBI control panel, emphasizing its user-friendly design and three-step setup process for automatic mode. It highlights individualized temperature control and the inclusion of all necessary components within each ECOMBI heater.
e room heat requirements where it is installed. An ECOMBI installation does not require external charging control units or additional timers. It is all included in each ECOMBI heater. POSSIBILITY OF MANAGING DIFFERENT CHARGING PERIODS ECOM...
AI summary The ECOMBI system allows for flexible programming of charging periods, delayed charging, and temperature settings to optimize energy use and cost. It supports off-peak tariff periods and can be integrated with digital meters for direct management by the electricity company.
p temperature can be programmed in a daily or weekly basis. The user can decide which periods of the day should be in COMFORT MODE and in ECO MODE (↓ 3 0C). On weekends this program can be override. “With the ECOMBI System, everything is u...
AI summary The ECOMBI system is a heating solution that can be programmed to operate in comfort or eco modes, reducing energy usage. It can be integrated with air-sourced heat pumps and qualifies for special off-peak electrical rates, helping users save money by shifting energy use to off-peak hours.
The whole idea of using this combination of products is to provide heat around the clock in the whole house moving all the heat energy expenses to the off peak hours in order to reduce expenses. ECOMBI AND GAS OR WOOD STOVES AND FIREPLACES...
AI summary ECOMBI is a heating system that stores heat during off-peak hours and releases it to maintain desired temperatures in a home. It can complement other heating sources like gas or wood stoves, but if those sources fail, ECOMBI will compensate using its internal emitter, potentially increasing electricity costs.
11 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 12 of 16 ECOMBI DETERMINE THE CORRECT SIZE OF ECOMBI In order to keep energy bills in check while homeowners stay in the warm comfort of their home, installers have to make sur...
AI summary The text provides instructions on determining the correct size of ECOMBI for installation, emphasizing the importance of calculating square footage and adjusting wattage based on ceiling height. It outlines steps for installers to ensure proper and efficient installation.
e the typical 8 feet ceiling, then the installer needs to adjust the wattage requirement, if the ceiling is 25 percent higher, then it would be necessary to multiply the square footage by 1.25. CHECK THE INSULATION LEVEL OF THE ROOM Sizing...
AI summary The text provides guidelines for properly sizing and installing ECOMBI heaters, emphasizing considerations such as ceiling height, insulation levels, and placement to ensure optimal performance and efficiency.
16 MINIMIZE OBSTRUCTION Sofas and other fixtures in the room can reduce ECOMBI efficiency. Additionally, hanging objects must be at least 12 inches away from the target area of ECOMBI heaters. CALCULATE THE WATTAGE NEEDED TO HEAT THE ROOM...
AI summary The text provides guidance on installing ECOMBI heaters, including minimizing obstructions, calculating required wattage based on room size and insulation, checking heater specifications, and a warning about sizing ECOMBI when used with other heat sources that are not 24-hour systems.
13 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 14 of 16 ECOMBI TECHNICAL FEATURES ►► Silent performance. ►► Temperature sensor with calibration option. ►► Overheating protection at storage heating. ►► Safety thermostat with...
AI summary The document outlines the technical features of ECOMBI, highlighting its silent performance, safety mechanisms, materials used, installation ease, programming capabilities, and compatibility with electric tariffs.
gy option. ►► Storage, Combined storage, Convection, Frost protection and Automatic ECOMBI operation modes can be set up. ►► Weekly programming. ►► Visual alarm.
AI summary The text describes features of a device, including storage options, convection, frost protection, and automatic operation modes, as well as weekly programming and visual alarm capabilities.
MODEL ECO158 ECO208 ECO308 ECO408 Predictive emitter power 450W 600W 900W 1200W Storage power 985W 1310W 1960W 2620W Charging (8h) 7.9 kWh 10.5 kWh 15.7 kWh 21.0 kWh Connection 240 V ~ 60Hz 240 V ~ 60Hz 240 V ~ 60Hz 240 V ~ 60Hz Length 55c...
AI summary The document presents technical specifications for four models (ECO158, ECO208, ECO308, ECO408) of a heating system, including power ratings, storage capacity, dimensions, weight, insulation class, and brick configurations. It also notes that the storage heater elements and predictive emitter element will not operate simultaneously.
11016 11016 Storage heater elements and predictive emitter element will never operate at the same time. 14 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 3 Page 15 of 16 ECOMBI, SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY The ECOMBI System does not re...
AI summary The ECOMBI System is described as a safe, maintenance-free electric heating solution with no moving parts, requiring no fuel tanks or hydraulic circuits. It is environmentally friendly, does not emit CO2 or produce fumes, and can be powered by renewable energy sources. The system is highlighted as promoting a healthy environment and being suitable for both new and old buildings.
Unit Dimensions Field Connection and Circuit Breaker Sizing Reference Chart This chart reflects only the code interpretation of Height: Steffes. It is the responsibility of the installer to Length: 24 1/2” comply with all applicable codes...
AI summary This document provides a reference chart for field connection and circuit breaker sizing for heating units, including wire sizes and maximum circuit breaker sizes. It also outlines line voltage connections for 2100 series room heating units, specifying single or two circuit element feed configurations.
element circuit or from a separate feed. (The heater must be wired in compliance with all applicable codes and regulations.) Single Feed Connection NOTE: Connections shown are for systems with a 240V/280V blower/controls circuit. Steffes 3...
AI summary The document outlines wiring instructions for a heating system, including single and multiple feed connections, and details about automatic charge control using an outdoor sensor or a power line carrier transmitter for peak control.
Control • Requires an external switching device such as a relay panel to directly control the element circuits. • Blower/controls circuit must be powered with an uninterrupted circuit. Specifications (For Standard 240VAC Systems) 2102 Mode...
AI summary The text provides technical specifications for charging systems, including required external switching devices, voltage requirements, and details on model-specific charging inputs, weight, storage capacity, and blower wattage. It outlines the necessary electrical configurations for proper operation.
-See Note 3 Blower Wattage- See Note 4 30 Minimum 120 Maximum Note 1: The heating ability of each system is dependent upon the power company’s availableoff-peak hours. Please con- tact Steffes for assistance in selecting the appropriate si...
AI summary The document provides technical specifications for the 4100 Comfort Plus Forced Air unit, including blower wattage, voltage options, and installation requirements. It outlines configurations, accessories, and warranty information.
an optional accessory from the factory. • Unit will fit through a 30” doorway without disassembling. For smaller openings or for ease in moving, the unit can be disassembled. Placement and Clearances • The area in which the Comfort Plus un...
AI summary The text provides installation and placement guidelines for the Comfort Plus unit, including clearance requirements and optional accessories. It also describes low voltage peak control connections and mentions optional components such as the Steffes Power Line Carrier Transceiver and Time Clock Module.
a 58601-9413 701-483-5400 Rev 3 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 5 Page 4 of 4 Specifications for Standard 240VAC Systems Model 4120 4130 4140 Charging Input (See Note 1) 14.0 kW 19.2 kW 24.8 kW 28.8 kW 37.2 kW 38.4 kW...
AI summary The document outlines specifications for 240VAC systems with various models, including charging input, circuit requirements, storage capacity, and dimensions. It provides technical details for different system models, such as power ratings, circuit ampacity, and weight.
t installed within the heated area, heat lost statically must be taken into account when sizing a system. Contact Steffes for assistance in selecting an appropriately sized system. Note 4: The indoor coil and outdoor compressor of an air c...
AI summary The text provides technical specifications for the Comfort Plus Commercial Electric Thermal Storage Heating System, including installation considerations, dimensions, and notes on system sizing and accessories such as the return air plenum. It highlights the need for proper system sizing and the availability of optional accessories from the factory.
tion can accommodate most 3 to 5 ton heating/cooling coils The 3/4 HP air handler 90,000 BTU/hr water coil output may decrease when using heating/cooling coils smaller than 5 tons DIMENSIONAL DIAGRAMS Supply Air Outlet Blower Access Coil...
AI summary The text describes technical specifications of an air handler, including its capacity for heating/cooling coils and potential output reduction with smaller coils. It also includes dimensional diagrams and a page reference from a document filed by NS Power on March 29, 2019.
Low Voltage Connections - Wall Thermostat, Sensor, and Compressor 24 VAC wall thermostat must be used. Honeywell brands shown in schematics and recommended. A digital wall thermostat is recommended for use with Comfort Plus systems. If...
AI summary The document outlines technical specifications for low voltage connections in heating systems, including the use of specific thermostats, sensors, and compressors. It recommends Honeywell thermostats and discusses the need for a load resistor when using mechanical thermostats with Comfort Plus systems. It also mentions the inclusion of an outdoor sensor for automatic charge control.
oltage - See Note 2 N/A 120V Conductor Required) Storage Capacity - See Note 3 kWh 240 240 BTU 818,800 818,800 Approximate Installed Weight (lbs) 3,859 3,894 Max Coil Dimensions (W x D x H) - ½ HP: 30” x 22 5/16” x 22 3/4” 26” x 22” x 31”...
AI summary The text provides technical specifications for a heating system, including voltage, storage capacity, weight, coil dimensions, pipe size, and pressure requirements. It includes details such as BTU output, temperature ranges, and pressure relief valve requirements.
Table 3: SBES Unitary Admin Cost Measure Admin Cost Unit Count 1/2 Size Hot Food Holding Cabinet Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Advanced Lighting Design (Performance Lighting) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Air Source Hea...
AI summary The table outlines administrative costs for various energy efficiency measures under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, with some measures having zero administrative costs and others having significant costs associated with them.
or Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Door Heater Controls Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Double Heat Pad (Agriculture) Small Business Energy Solutions $1,490.09 6 Downlight Luminaire (1200 lumen) Small Business Energy Soluti...
AI summary The text presents a list of items and associated costs under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including various energy-efficient equipment and their corresponding expenses and quantities.
Measure Admin Cost Unit Count High Bay Luminaire (60 000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 High Efficiency Circulator Pump 1.5kW Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 High Efficiency Circulator Pump 100W Small Business Energ...
AI summary The text provides a list of energy efficiency measures under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including various lighting and HVAC equipment, along with associated administrative costs and the number of units for some items.
$3,625.90 83 LED Wall Sconce (3000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 LED Wall Sconce (800 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Linear Ambient Luminaire (10000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $20,512.88 278 Lin...
AI summary The text lists various energy efficiency products and their associated costs under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including LED wall sconces, linear ambient luminaires, replacement lamps, and other energy-efficient equipment with corresponding spending amounts and quantities.
umen) Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Pole/Arm-Mounted Area Luminaire (20000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $121,780.87 1945 Pole/Arm-Mounted Area Luminaire (4000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $10,438.36 834 Pole/A...
AI summary The text lists various lighting and equipment installations under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including costs and quantities for different luminaire types. It appears to be a financial breakdown or summary of expenditures related to energy efficiency initiatives for small businesses.
Measure Admin Cost Unit Count Refrigerated Vending Machine Controls Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Remote Condensing Unit Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Self-Contained Ice Maker Small Business Energy Solutions $0.00 0 Ser...
AI summary The text presents a list of energy efficiency measures under the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including details on administrative costs and unit counts for various equipment. Most entries show zero administrative costs and unit counts, with a few exceptions such as Solid Door Refrigerator and Standard Capacity Electric Fryer.
l Mounted Area Luminaire (1000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $9,820.41 311 Wall Mounted Area Luminaire (10000 lumen) Small Business Energy Solutions $56,367.15 1667 Wall Mounted Area Luminaire (50000 lumen) Small Business Energy S...
AI summary The text provides administrative cost data for energy efficiency programs, including specific measures and their associated costs and unit counts for Small Business Energy Solutions and Home Energy Assessments. The data includes various lighting and heating measures, with some measures having zero costs and unit counts.
ergy Assessment $536,239.13 1,745 Whole Home Home Energy Assessment $3,483,047.39 2,804 Average Per Unit Admin $848.68 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-41 Attachment 8 Page 1 of 3 Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates: Registration effi...
AI summary The text describes the Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates program offered by efficiencyPEI, which provides incentives for energy efficiency upgrades in existing homes. Applicants must meet eligibility criteria, complete upgrades by the application date, and provide receipts for work done. The program targets homeowners, with rebates issued directly to them or to contractors.
City/town: Postal code: Phone: PID: The dwelling owner has the right to allow or deny a particular individual or contractor access to their residence for the purpose of performing these upgrades. Neither efficiencyPEI nor the Government of...
AI summary The text outlines the rights of dwelling owners regarding access to their property for energy efficiency upgrades and the certification process for eligibility in the Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates program. It also includes a privacy notice under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
on of personal information, you may contact the Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy, efficiencyPEI, 69 Belvedere Avenue, Suite 1-B01, Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8, 902-620-3690. Please sign and date This program is funded...
AI summary The text includes contact information for the Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy, efficiencyPEI, and details about a low-income rebate program with a rate of $4.00 per square foot per R-value increase, with specific R-value requirements for ceilings.
00.00 $4,500.00 $8.00/SQ/R-value ENERGY STAR Most Efficientincrease 2018 (minimum EERMinimum 12.5, SEERR-value 18.0, HSPFincrease 9.6) of R6
AI summary The text includes a table with financial and energy efficiency data, mentioning ENERGY STAR Most Efficient standards for 2018 with specific metrics such as EER, SEER, and HSPF, along with an R-value of 6.
Program SolarSealing: Air Thermal Hot Water Heater $1,500.00 $2,750.00 ENERGY STARRegular or CAN/CSA F379 or CSA Class 2831-06, 2831-07, 2831-30, 2831-37 Rebate: Low or Class 8854 Income Reb 10% improvement Tankless over Heater Propane Hot...
AI summary The text provides rebate details for various hot water heater and ventilation programs, including eligibility criteria and rebate amounts based on efficiency improvements and compliance with specific standards.
EER and 4.1Rebates COP program shall be determined by efficiencyPEI. 4. EnerGuide Closed Loop Water tohome evaluations Water GHP: willCOP 16.1 EER and 3.1 be required Open priorLoop toWater-to-Water: and after upgrades 20.1 and 3.5and COP...
AI summary The document outlines terms and conditions for the efficiencyPEI Energy Efficient Equipment program, including income eligibility, disclosure requirements, and timelines for completing upgrades. It also mentions the requirement for evaluations and access to the dwelling for implementation.
er the efficiencyPEI Energy Efficient Equipment program is registered with the Taxation and Property 7. I am/We are required to inform the contractor who is completing energy upgrades on my/our dwelling that the contractor must declare to...
AI summary The document outlines requirements and conditions for participation in the efficiencyPEI Energy Efficient Equipment Rebates program, including eligibility criteria, contractor obligations, information disclosure, and rebate limits.
all efficiencyPEI programs is $5,000.00. If the dwelling has received funding through other efficiencyPEI programs (loans or grants) 15.01. By asking for a home energy evaluation, I agree to the collection of that data for the sole purpose...
AI summary The text outlines terms and conditions for efficiencyPEI programs, including rebate limits, data collection for home energy evaluations, and disclosure requirements to NRCan. It also mentions obligations related to contractors and compliance with the Canada Revenue Agency.
information of ozone depletingby NRCan to substances efficiencyPEI (refrigerants) mustasbewell as to other completed provincial, by an individual territorial certified or municipal as a “registered organizations handler” as specifiedor uti...
AI summary The text references regulations related to ozone-depleting substances and the need for certified handlers, as well as incentive programs and environmental protection acts. It mentions the Cap. E-9 (Ozone Layer Protection Regulations) and Efficiency PEI, but lacks a clear narrative or argument.
intended to Electrical in the replace the requirement separately forAct Inspection any incentive R.S.P.E.I. 1988,orCap. rebate for which E-3 (Canadian I may Code Electrical be eligible. I agree Regulations.) that efficiencyPEI Certificate...
AI summary The text discusses requirements for geothermal heat pumps and the submission of compliance certificates, referencing the Canadian Electrical Code and the Efficiency PEI program. It also mentions the involvement of the Canadian Geo Exchange Coalition (CGC) and the authorization of the current electrical provider to release information.
Certified programs. My current electrical provider is hereby authorized to relea Installer. information to efficiencyPEI: billing account information such as the name of the account holder(s) and the number of kilowatt hours of electrical...
AI summary The text includes a form related to certified programs, specifically involving the release of billing account information to efficiencyPEI, including the name of the account holder and electricity consumption data. The form is signed and dated, and includes a reference number (18EG15-50246).
information. 21 b) Please refer to EfficiencyOne’s response to NS Power IR-41 for this information. 22 c) Please refer to EfficiencyOne’s response to NS Power IR-41 for this information. 23 d) Please refer to EfficiencyOne’s response to NS...
AI summary The document contains references to EfficiencyOne's response to NS Power IR-41 and mentions an application for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020-2022) under matter M09096.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-43: 2 3 Reference: Evid...
AI summary EfficiencyOne assumes that all residential customers with ETS systems use Time-of-Use (TOU) rates, but the benefits of ETS systems are based on avoided costs, not TOU rates. If TOU rates are discontinued, participation in ETS programs may decrease due to the perceived lack of key benefits.
Use rate as the key benefit and EfficiencyOne 28 would be unlikely to attract significant participation through incentives alone if the Time- 29 of-Use rate were to be discontinued. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-43 Page 1 of...
AI summary The text discusses EfficiencyOne's application for approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. It outlines a request for additional information regarding the inclusion of Lifetime Energy Savings as a third Performance Target.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 “EfficiencyOne continues to maintain the position advanced during the 3 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process, namely that 4 ‘…EfficiencyOne is open to considering lifetime energy savings as a 5 Performance Ta...
AI summary EfficiencyOne has maintained its position from the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan process, supporting the use of lifetime energy savings as a Performance Target in future plans. Econoler's evaluation process uses EUL values from literature reviews and product rated lifetimes, and introduced dual-baseline considerations for LED lighting in 2017. The Verification Consultant will assess the methodology.
1 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 46 In the same vein, the National Efficiency Screening Project2 (NESP) recently developed best practice guidelines that similarly call for either wholesale changes to the T...
AI summary The document discusses the need for changes to Nova Scotia's cost-effectiveness framework for demand-side management (DSM), citing best practices from the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) and the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnership (NEEP). It suggests shifting from the Total Resource Cost (TRC) method to the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test due to its simplicity and lower cost.
ency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act in that it requires the utility to procure DSM services. As a result of our review, we make the following recommendations: 2 The National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) is comprised of or...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for adopting the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as a primary test for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. It also suggests re-examining key inputs like the discount rate and developing a transparent reporting template based on the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) framework.
ded results it can produce. As a result, a number of regions have established Modified Total Resource Cost (MTRC) tests, primarily to integrate non-energy benefits into the equation. • The Societal Cost Test (SCT) is treated as a variant t...
AI summary The document discusses the evolution of cost tests used in energy efficiency programs, particularly the Modified Total Resource Cost (MTRC) and Societal Cost Test (SCT). It highlights changes made to the California Standard Practice Manual, including renaming of tests and the integration of non-energy benefits into evaluations.
ce given to DSM, most states and provinces that gave it consideration have, in the end, landed on the use of the TRC test as either the primary or sole indicator of cost-effectiveness. One of the reasons this was deemed acceptable to even...
AI summary The text discusses the use of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test as a primary or sole indicator of cost-effectiveness for Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs. It explains that in the 1990s, the TRC test was widely accepted because many low-cost DSM measures were available, leading to high benefit/cost ratios. The limitations of the TRC were largely theoretical and not seriously considered at the time.
pass the TRC, so long as the program as a whole passes (NSUARB - Decision In The Matter of an Application by ENSC for Approval of its Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2012, 2011). The Terms of Reference of NSPI’s 2014 IRP specif...
AI summary The text discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) approach and how the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test is used in evaluating Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs. It references the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process and legislation, including the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act (2014), which aims to reduce costs for NSPI customers through energy efficiency initiatives.
7 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 46 POLICY DRIVERS Nova Scotia’s DSM is arguably driven by imperatives outside of the strict regulatory arena as well. We note that in 2012, an equivalency agreement betwee...
AI summary Nova Scotia's DSM is influenced by broader policy drivers, including a 2012 equivalency agreement on climate change and the 2014 Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Plan. The plan introduces a new franchise (ENS) that promotes energy savings through competition with energy supply options, aligning with least-cost procurement principles.
8 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 46 CONCERNS WITH THE CONVENTIONAL TRC INTRODUCTION The Total Resource Cost test is meant to measure cost-effectiveness from the perspective of consumers, writ large, i.e....
AI summary The document discusses concerns with the conventional Total Resource Cost (TRC) test, highlighting four key issues: accuracy of calculation, potential bias in neglecting benefits, lack of ratepayer value perspective, and possible policy conflicts. It also mentions innovative practices elsewhere.
10 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 15 of 46 cost of the measures adopted by free riders (irrespective of who paid them), but none of the savings. ii. Avoided Costs: Avoided costs should encompass generation, tra...
AI summary The text discusses the concept of avoided costs and net savings in the context of energy efficiency programs. It highlights that avoided costs should include generation, transmission, distribution, and ancillary costs, and that net savings can be calculated using different approaches, including accounting for free ridership, spillover effects, and long-term market transformation.
nd algorithms used to calculate the TRC, and to the accuracy which one should reasonably expect of any TRC analysis.13 As noted previously, this concern applies equally to other tests. It is worth noting that some regions have deliberately...
AI summary The text discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) analysis and its methodology, highlighting concerns about accuracy, deliberate versus accidental methodological choices, and the impact of these choices on results. It also provides an example involving Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in a hotel context and notes potential errors in TRC calculations due to limitations in planning models.
13 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 18 of 46 PARTICIPANT NON-ENERGY BENEFITS (NEBS) Participant NEBs are increasingly understood to play a significant role in the overall value proposition that consumers derive f...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of participant non-energy benefits (NEBs) in the value proposition of energy-efficient technologies and services, emphasizing their significance from the perspectives of program marketers, academic literature, and market prices.
a) Program Marketers: While theoreticians may argue amongst themselves as to the importance of “non-energy benefits” and the theoretical basis for valuing them, they need look no further than DSM Program Administrators themselves. Indeed,...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of non-energy benefits (NEBs) in demand-side management (DSM) programs, emphasizing that they are often more persuasive in marketing than energy-related economics. It argues that ignoring NEBs can lead to underinvestment in energy efficiency programs and higher costs for utility customers, citing a statement from Tim Woolf et al.
cy of - Tim Woolf et al., in “Energy Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness Screening”, Nov. 2012. equipment replacement). Meanwhile, incorporating daylighting into new commercial office buildings is sold far more on improved worker productivity an...
AI summary The text discusses how non-energy benefits (NEBs) of energy efficiency programs are often undervalued in cost-effectiveness analyses, despite their significant impact on benefit-cost ratios. It references studies from Massachusetts and other regions that show NEBs can account for up to 70% of a program's total benefits, highlighting the importance of incorporating these benefits in evaluations.
example, for new, energy efficient homes, studies have found the value of participant NEBs alone at between 0.5 to Figure 5: Massachusetts’ (MA) Benefit/Cost: Impact of Neglecting NEBs 3.6 times the energy savings, or some $5,000- Impact o...
AI summary The text highlights the significant value of non-energy benefits (NEBs) from energy efficiency programs, showing that NEBs can be several times greater than the value of energy savings. Examples include residential and industrial programs where NEBs exceed energy savings by up to 120%.
nts found productivity benefits to exceed 120% the value of energy savings alone (Worrell, Laitner, Ruth, & Finman, 2001). Even residential lighting and appliances have been shown to generate NEB benefits that participants value at between...
AI summary The text discusses non-energy benefits (NEB) of energy efficiency programs, noting that participants value them significantly, sometimes exceeding energy savings alone. It also highlights market price premiums for energy-efficient homes in various regions, indicating that real estate markets value efficiency, though the TRC does not account for these benefits.
state markets could value efficiency at $20,000 per home, but if 15 This is notably, though not solely, the case where strong energy performance labeling policies are in place. WWW.DUNSKY.CA 15 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Att...
AI summary The text discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) methodology and its potential bias against energy efficiency investments by not fully accounting for non-energy benefits (NEBs). It highlights that while TRC considers all participant costs, it only accounts for a portion of benefits, leading to regulatory decisions that may undervalue efficiency measures. This bias is becoming more significant as DSM goals increase and baselines improve.
e DSM goals and improving baselines (whether by codes and standards or market interest) is turning a largely theoretical bias into a practical – and increasingly significant – problem. In fact, in the past two years alone, clients of ours...
AI summary The Total Resource Cost (TRC) test is criticized for not fully accounting for non-energy benefits (NEBs), leading to a potential bias against conservation programs. This issue has become more significant as NEBs have grown in prevalence due to the very programs the TRC previously allowed.
ized cost of power). The value of DSM as a fuel price hedge depends on the extent to which it avoids power generation options that require substantial fuel purchases.17 2. Power Planning / Reliability: From a power planning perspective, DS...
AI summary The text discusses the value of Demand-Side Management (DSM) as a fuel price hedge and its reliability compared to new power plants. It highlights DSM's reliability due to reduced risks from permitting and construction delays, and its planning flexibility, which can offset savings shortfalls through diverse program levers and opportunities.
ideration to power planning risk issues in North America – have chosen to attribute a risk benefit to DSM for purposes of cost-effectiveness analysis.19,20 Societal NEBs While we have discussed participant and utility NEBs, DSM is also kno...
AI summary The text discusses the inclusion of non-energy benefits (NEBs) in cost-effectiveness analysis for demand-side management (DSM), emphasizing societal benefits such as environmental and macroeconomic impacts. It references the conventional Total Resource Cost (TRC) framework and highlights concerns about its bias against energy efficiency resources.
iveness improvements associated with Commercial and Industrial (C&I) sector savings. A recent study (Acadia Center, 2014) found that aggressive energy efficiency efforts in Nova Scotia would 19 In Vermont, the Vermont Public Service Board...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency improvements in the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) sector, referencing studies from Vermont and the northwest U.S. that highlight the cost reductions and risk mitigation benefits of demand-side management (DSM). It also mentions Nova Scotia's legislated CO2e cap and its impact on carbon emissions and cost-effectiveness analysis for DSM options.
ate, which is commonly viewed as the government’s cost of borrowing?23 New York and many New England states use a societal discount rate within their own TRCs. SUMMARY OF NEB ISSUES Increasingly, non-energy benefits – especially those that...
AI summary Nova Scotia's current Total Resource Cost (TRC) does not account for non-energy benefits, creating a bias against Demand-Side Management (DSM). Other regions have modified their TRC to include non-energy benefits or adopted different tests, such as the Modified TRC. This omission affects the evaluation of DSM programs and their overall impact on participants and society.
contributions to the program administrator budget). This approach – direct installation of all TRC-positive measures – could well achieve the most possible savings that are deemed cost effective from the TRC perspective, at the least total...
AI summary The text discusses the Total Resource Cost (TRC) approach in energy efficiency programs, noting that while it aims to minimize total costs, it may not effectively reflect program efficiency or how efficiently program funds are used to achieve energy savings. It also highlights concerns that focusing too much on TRC may lead to suboptimal decisions for ratepayers.
osts and not just program costs, it may arguably be an unfair measure by which to compare options. This is noted in the California Standard Practice Manual’s own discussion of the TRC: “In addition, the costs of the DSM ‘resource’ in the T...
AI summary The text discusses the limitations of the Total Resource Cost (TRC) in evaluating Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs, noting that it may unfairly compare options by including participant costs, unlike supply-side resources. It also highlights that TRC may distort savings opportunities due to varying consumer value. Nova Scotia uses TRC for DSM screening, but the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test is the only one reflecting utility least-cost procurement.
remental annual energy savings during that period tended to be in the range of 0.25-0.75% for the reasonably aggressive regions, with a small handful of outlier regions aiming slightly higher. Today, DSM goals (and in some cases, legislate...
AI summary The text discusses the evolution of Demand-Side Management (DSM) goals and baselines over time, noting that while targets have increased significantly, improvements in baseline efficiency have also occurred due to factors like consumer awareness and new regulations. This has led to higher incremental costs for DSM administrators, particularly in the residential sector, where measures like deep envelope retrofits and solar hot water are increasingly necessary.
e a recurring focus on such measures as deep envelope retrofits, solar hot water, and advanced construction techniques, among others, needed to secure deeper, long-term energy savings. This is not a theoretical issue. In fact, we are incre...
AI summary The text discusses the need for deep energy-saving measures such as envelope retrofits and solar hot water to achieve long-term savings. It highlights the tension between policy goals and cost-effectiveness tests in determining which demand-side management (DSM) measures to prioritize. An example from British Columbia is provided, where a legislated savings target exceeded TRC cost-effectiveness benchmarks.
the TRC. contradictory in that all programs were required to pass the original TRC – remained in place for another five years. This framework was finally modified in December 2011. WWW.DUNSKY.CA 23 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44...
AI summary The Total Resource Cost (TRC) framework faced criticism for errors, bias, and conflicts with energy policies, leading to modifications in 2011. Many regions, including top DSM leaders, have since moved to adjust or replace the TRC with alternatives like Modified Total Resource Cost (MTRC), Program Administrator Cost (PAC), or Societal Cost Test (SCT).
Portfolio New policy (adopted October 23, 2014). Legend: Significant inclusion Partial inclusion References: BC (Muncaster, 2011); CA (Application of Southern California Edison Company for Approval of its 2009-2011 Energy Efficiency Progra...
AI summary This text discusses the adoption of a new policy in October 2014 and references various energy efficiency programs and frameworks. It mentions the Resource Value Framework (RVF), developed by the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP), which assesses cost-effectiveness screening practices and provides guidance on selecting appropriate approaches.
program administrators should use a standard template to explicitly identify their state’s energy policy goals and to document their assumptions and methodologies. Among other things, the RFV proposes a template by which to assess to what...
AI summary The document discusses the need for program administrators to use a standard template to align with energy policy goals and the Resource Value Framework (RVF) principles. It mentions the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) and the adoption of cost-effectiveness guidelines by northeastern U.S. states inspired by the RVF framework.
to develop cost-effectiveness screening guidelines for the region. These guidelines do not prescribe any one cost-effectiveness test, but focus instead on five key principles: (1) Aligning screening practices with state energy policies (2)...
AI summary The document outlines cost-effectiveness screening guidelines developed by the National Efficiency Screening Project (NESP) and adopted by the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP) EM&V Forum. These guidelines focus on five key principles, including aligning with energy policies, accounting for non-energy benefits, and using a standard template for transparency.
Connecticut is not only among the historical DSM leaders in North America, but has recently adopted an unofficial goal of becoming the top U.S. state in future ACEEE scorecard results. In the past five years, other jurisdictions have also...
AI summary The text discusses the adoption of the Program Assessment Criteria (PAC) in various jurisdictions, noting concerns about its impact on equity and non-electric energy sources. It highlights Nova Scotia's approach to addressing these concerns and reaffirms the value of transitioning to the PAC for evaluating energy efficiency programs.
34 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 39 of 46 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS There are several options available to Nova Scotia to improve the value provided by cost-effectiveness screening of DSM initiatives. Some...
AI summary The document discusses options for improving the cost-effectiveness screening of DSM initiatives in Nova Scotia. It highlights concerns with the current TRC framework and suggests alternatives like the PAC, which is seen as a more balanced and familiar approach for evaluating program efficiency and value to ratepayers.
ed for each dollar provided to ENS. In addition, stakeholders and the UARB are already familiar with the workings of the PAC, which has been reported on in DSM Plans for several years. Finally, the PAC perspective is strongly aligned with...
AI summary The text discusses the adoption of the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as a primary test for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Demand Side Management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. It aligns with the objectives of Nova Scotia’s Electricity Efficiency and Conservation plan, emphasizing least-cost procurement and market transformation. Recommendations include applying the PAC test at different levels and developing a transparent reporting template.
NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 41 of 46 REFERENCES Acadia Center. (2014). Energy Efficiency: Engine of Economic Growth in Canada . Amann, J. (2006). “Valuation of Non-Energy Benefits to Determine Cost-Effectiveness. ACEEE Report Number A...
AI summary The text lists various references to energy efficiency and demand-side management (DSM) literature, policies, and case studies, including reports from organizations like the Acadia Center, ACEEE, and Efficiency Vermont, as well as regulatory decisions and policy manuals from different states and provinces.
Efficiency Scorecard for 2006. Washington: ACEEE. Energy Trust of Oregon. (2011). Cost Effectiveness Policy and General Methodology for Energy Trust of Oregon. Evan, M. (2004). The Cost-Effectiveness of Commercial Buildings Commissioning:...
AI summary The text includes references to various energy efficiency studies, policies, and methodologies, including works from the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), the Energy Trust of Oregon, and Efficiency Vermont. These documents discuss cost-effectiveness analysis, non-energy benefits, and evaluation methods for energy efficiency programs.
Kushler, M., Nowak, S., & Witte, P. (2012). A National Survey of State Policies and Practices for the Evaluation of Ratepyer-Funded Energy Efficiency Programs. Washington: ACEE. Kushler, M., Nowak, S., & Witte, P. (2012). A National Survey...
AI summary The text presents a list of references and publications related to energy efficiency programs, policies, and evaluations conducted by various organizations and agencies. It includes studies on ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs, non-energy benefits, and cost-effectiveness screening principles.
Review White Paper. New York Public Service Commission. (2011). Order Authorizing Efficiency Programs, Revising Incentive Mechanism, and Establishing a Surcharge Schedule . WWW.DUNSKY.CA 38 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachm...
AI summary The text lists various regulatory and program-related documents, including efficiency programs, energy strategies, and legal acts, primarily related to Nova Scotia's energy sector and regulatory proceedings. These references highlight the development and evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory decisions.
pacts of Energy Efficiency Programs. NARUC Comittee on Energy Resources and the Environment. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffiusion of Innovations (Fifth ed.). New York: Free Press. Sciortino, M., Neubauer, M., Vaidyanathan, S., Chittum, A., Hay...
AI summary The text includes a list of references and citations related to energy efficiency programs, including studies, reports, and legal documents. These references cover topics such as energy efficiency scorecards, integrated resource plans, and regulatory decisions on energy efficiency initiatives.
Participant Comfort Additional Low-Income Participant Benefits Other Participant Non-Energy Benefits 4. Monetized Public Costs Monetized Public Benefits Public Costs Public Benefits of Low Income Programs Reduced Environmental Impacts (if...
AI summary The text outlines categories of costs and benefits associated with low-income energy programs, including monetized and non-monetized public benefits such as reduced environmental impacts, public health care costs, and increased reliability, as well as non-monetized benefits like customer equity and job creation.
41 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-44 Attachment 1 Page 46 of 46 50 Ste-Catherine St. West, suite 420, Montreal, Québec, Canada H2X 3V4 T. 514.504.9030 F. 514.289.2665 [email protected] WWW.DUNSKY.CA 42 www. dunsky.ca EfficiencyOne – E...
AI summary EfficiencyOne responds to a request regarding the variability of annual energy savings and avoided costs in the context of Lifetime Energy Savings (LES) and Lifetime Benefits calculations. EfficiencyOne clarifies that these values can vary from year to year over the Effective Useful Lifetimes of measures, and the example provided was simplified to illustrate the influence of first-year and lifetime savings on Lifetime Benefits.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-46: 2 3 Reference: Evid...
AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes a 75% threshold for Lifetime Energy Savings (LES) performance targets, as opposed to the 90% threshold for shorter-term savings. The proposal is partially based on future volatility in LES evaluations and the declining LED lighting measure component in the DSM portfolio.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-48: 2 3 Please explain...
AI summary EfficiencyOne explains that its Preferred Plan for the 2020-2022 DSM Plan balances long-term energy and system-peak demand savings by introducing demand-focused DSM activities, such as demand reduction programs. This approach differs from past DSM plans, which primarily focused on energy savings due to lower near-term avoided capacity costs.
e creation of the Alternate Scenario. Participation levels in the Preferred 16 Plan were reduced to produce the Alternate Scenario as described in EfficiencyOne’s response to 17 NS Power IR-67. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-5...
AI summary The document discusses the creation of an Alternate Scenario by reducing participation levels in the Preferred Plan, as outlined in EfficiencyOne’s response to NS Power IR-67. It also references a supply agreement application for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-53: 2 3 Specify the Pro...
AI summary EfficiencyOne explains that the ProCESS optimization model was used initially to develop a starting point for the 2020-2022 DSM Plan, but no constraints were applied to the final Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario. The optimizer tool was not used to generate final results, and the final plan was shaped by internal expertise and program delivery experience.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-57: 2 3 Reference: Appe...
AI summary The document discusses a request for clarification regarding the definition of 'leading North American efficiency program administrator' and whether EfficiencyOne is considered one. It references a study by Glenn Reed that benchmarks EfficiencyOne against other North American efficiency program administrators, including those identified by the American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy (ACEEE).
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 • It was a program administrator o...
AI summary The document discusses EfficiencyOne's performance in energy efficiency programs compared to peer groups, noting a decline in savings from 2014 to 2017. EfficiencyOne references the ACEEE Scorecard methodology and explains that no comparable Canadian studies exist for benchmarking. A trend adjustment is proposed based on these findings.
ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-58: 2 3 Reference: Appe...
AI summary The document outlines a request (IR-58) related to benchmarking metrics used in electricity efficiency and conservation activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. It asks for evidence supporting the use of specific metrics and references the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy’s (ACEEE) report.
electric Reference Reference URL Budget Sales Revenue Savings Savings expenditure Massachusetts Joint Statewide Electric and Gas Three-Year http://ma-eeac.org/wordpress/wp- Eversource MA X Energy Efficiency Plan. October 31, 2018. content/...
AI summary The text lists energy efficiency plans from Eversource MA, National Grid MA, and National Grid RI, including references to three-year plans and procurement strategies. These documents provide insights into energy efficiency initiatives and system reliability efforts in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
ps://aceee.org/research-report/u1707 X X Scorecard Benchmarking 2011 and 2012 Demand Side Management https://publicservice.vermont.gov/sites/dps/file Results for Efficiency Vermont and Burlington Electric s/documents/Energy_Efficiency/EVT_...
AI summary This document includes benchmarking reports on demand side management (DSM) programs from Vermont, as well as an application by EfficiencyOne to Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between 2020 and 2022.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-60: 2 3 Reference: Appendix E, Direct Testimony of Glenn Reed, page 5, lines 6-7 state that, 4 “in addition to the utilities listed in Table 1, we also considered non-utility PAs like 5 Efficiency Vermont that...
AI summary The response to Request IR-60 explains that Glenn Reed considered non-utility Program Administrators (PAs) only if they were significant participants in the top 10 ACEEE Efficiency Scorecard. Efficiency Vermont was included due to its prominence in Vermont, while others like the Efficiency Trust of Oregon and New York State Energy Research Development Authority were excluded due to lack of available data or complex relationships with utilities. The response asserts there was no systematic bias in excluding non-utility PAs.
Section VI of Dr. Hill’s Direct Testimony. The following eight slides summarize the 4 findings for the forecasted net benefits from efficiency in 2030, as cited in the testimony. Date Filed: March 29, 2019 E1 (NS Power) IR-69 Page 4 of 9 E...
AI summary This section of Dr. Hill’s testimony outlines the forecasted net benefits from efficiency initiatives in 2030. It includes references to EfficiencyOne’s application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. and related regulatory matter M09096.
E-52018 DSM Evaluation Reports
919 passages
EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA Final Report March 27, 2019
AI summary Final report from Efficiency Nova Scotia dated March 27, 2019. The document contains only the title, date, and placeholder images, with no substantive content or analysis provided in the text.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. Adjustment ratio The ratio of evaluated results to tracked results. This ratio expresses the adjustment made to tracked savings or other tracked values such as...
AI summary The document defines key terms and concepts related to energy efficiency, measurement accuracy, and evaluation methodologies. It includes definitions such as accuracy, adjustment ratio, base case, bias, billing calibration, confidence interval, displaced wattage, EnerGuide rating, effective useful life, equivalent CO2, and equivalent effective useful life.
INTRODUCTION Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) is operated by EfficiencyOne, an independent, non-profit organization. ENS is responsible for helping Nova Scotians improve the energy efficiency of their homes and workplaces by designing, marketi...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), operated by EfficiencyOne, delivers energy efficiency programs funded by Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and the Province. An evaluation by Econoler and partners found ENS's 2018 DSM programs achieved 151.393 GWh in net energy savings and 25.542 MW in peak demand savings, reducing GHG emissions by 92,659 tonnes annually. Codes and Standards also contributed savings, though not attributed to ENS.
1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE The objectives of the 2018 evaluation of ENS DSM program components were to: - › Assess the effectiveness of program component design and delivery - › Determine the extent to which program component implem...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of ENS DSM program components aimed to assess the effectiveness of program design and delivery, determine implementation progress, calculate energy and peak demand savings, and analyze market evolution of LED lamps and mini-split heat pumps. Table 1 outlines evaluated programs, their components, and evaluation types.
Table 1: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component B D 2017 2018 Program Program Component Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R С С Product Rebates Program Ins...
AI summary Table 1 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for various program components in residential and business energy efficiency initiatives. It includes details on process, market, and impact evaluations for different programs such as appliance retirement, product rebates, and energy management systems.
Process Evaluations The Evaluator recommended that the New Construction service of Custom, New Home Construction, and Business Energy Rebates would benefit the most from a process evaluation in 2018. & lt;sup>b The process evaluation speci...
AI summary The Evaluator recommended process evaluations for New Construction, Business Energy Rebates, and Retrofit services in 2017-2018. Participants reported moderate satisfaction with New Home Construction but criticized incentive levels and low participation. Business Energy Rebates, generating 86% of ENS savings, faces challenges in diversifying measures beyond lighting. Strategic Energy Management had no 2017 savings due to cohort timing.
Table 2: 2018 Interviews Completed 2018 Interviews Completed Program Component or Service Program Manager Distributors/ Contractors Participants Retailers Energy Advisors/ Service Providers Associations Appliance Retirement 1 - - - - - Ins...
AI summary Table 2 summarizes the number of interviews completed in 2018 across various program components and services, including appliance retirement, instant savings, home energy assessments, and others. The table lists the number of interviews conducted with different stakeholders such as program managers, distributors, participants, and associations.
Intercept Survey As part of the Instant Savings evaluation, an in-store intercept survey was conducted with participants who purchased eligible LED lamps and fixtures. The in-store interviews were conducted throughout the 2018 fall campaig...
AI summary An intercept survey was conducted during the 2018 fall campaign to evaluate Instant Savings, focusing on LED purchases, consumer awareness, and free-ridership. The survey involved 194 participants across five retail chains, gathering insights on product usage, program awareness, and in-store experiences.
For those program components whose savings were established based on custom calculations for each measure installed, the Evaluator reviewed the savings calculations of a sample of projects. These calculations consist of either engineering...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed savings calculations for program components based on custom calculations, using engineering methods or measurement and verification. Adjustments were sometimes extrapolated to other projects in the same category, including Custom, Small Business Energy Solutions, and Mail-in Rebates.
2.9 Effective Useful Life Review To establish the persistence of energy savings over time, the Evaluator determined the effective useful life (EUL) values to be used in all program components. For most program components, the Evaluator sim...
AI summary The Evaluator applied existing EUL values from 2017 to 2018 energy savings for most programs but recalculated equivalent EULs for programs affected by upcoming regulations. A new EUL was established for Strategic Energy Management based on literature and project analysis, as it had no participants in 2017.
2.10 Avoided GHG Emissions Quantification The impacts of ENS activities on avoided GHG emissions were estimated for all program components by using a Nova Scotia-specific factor for GHG emissions generated by electricity production.3 Since...
AI summary ENS quantified avoided GHG emissions using a Nova Scotia-specific factor derived from 2017 NSP data (0.6126 kg CO2 eq per kWh saved). The methodology excludes additional fuel consumption from fuel-switching measures in New Construction projects, focusing only on avoided electricity generation.
3 IMPACT EVALUATION RESULTS This section presents an analysis of the impact evaluation results for all program components by comparing the 2018 tracked energy and peak demand savings with those evaluated. The evaluated netto-gross ratios,...
AI summary This section compares 2018 tracked energy and peak demand savings with evaluated results, presenting netto-gross ratios, lifetime energy savings, and GHG emission reductions. The analysis focuses on program performance metrics and their environmental impacts.
3.1 Individual Impact Evaluation Results Table 5 and Table 6 below summarize the evaluated energy and peak demand savings as well as the corresponding savings tracked by ENS for each program component offered in 2018. For evaluated energy...
AI summary This section presents the results of individual impact evaluations for energy and peak demand savings from programs offered in 2018. It distinguishes between initial gross savings, adjusted gross savings, and net savings calculated using the net-to-gross ratio. Lifetime energy savings are also outlined based on the effective useful life of the efficient measures.
Table 5: 2018 Evaluated Results and Tracked Energy Savings at the Generator Sa ( ) 2 0 1 8 En in G W h er g g s y v Pr du Re ba t te o c s Ins Sa ing ta t n v s 2 4. 2 6 2 2 4. 2 6 2 0. 9 0 2 1. 9 3 0 1 8 9. 3 3 6 2 3. 6 3 5 1 9. 9 6 7 Ho...
AI summary Table 5 presents the 2018 evaluated results and tracked energy savings at the generator, including data on rebates, savings, and efficiency improvements. The table includes metrics such as energy savings, costs, and performance across various categories.
Table 6: 2018 Evaluated Results and Tracked Peak Demand Savings at the Generator 2 0 1 8 Pe k De d Sa in ( M W ) a m an v g s Ev lu d te a a E N S D S M Pr og ra m D S M Pr Co t og ra m m p on en An l In i ia l t nu a G Sa in ro ss v g s A...
AI summary Table 6 presents the 2018 evaluated results and tracked peak demand savings at the generator for various demand-side management programs. It includes data on initial savings, adjusted savings, net-to-gross ratio, and tracked net actual savings for different initiatives such as appliance retirement and home energy assessments.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates In 2018, Residential Efficient Product Rebates achieved net electrical energy and peak demand savings at the generator of 24.588 GWh and 2.951 MW, respectively. The two components under this program ar...
AI summary In 2018, the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings. The program includes two components: Appliance Retirement and Instant Savings, with their respective savings results detailed in the text.
Instant Savings In 2018, 669,550 products were sold through Instant Savings which represents fewer sales than in 2017. Although the overall savings achieved by Instant Savings in 2018 were higher than in 2017, due to higher average savings...
AI summary In 2018, Instant Savings sold 669,550 products, with LED A-type lamps being the most popular. Despite fewer sales than in 2017, overall savings increased due to higher average savings per product. Net electrical energy savings were 21.930 GWh and net peak demand savings were 2.572 MW. Evaluated savings were higher than tracked savings due to adjustments in unitary savings and increased spillover levels.
Existing Residential In 2018, the net energy savings of Existing Residential reached 22.728 GWh while the net peak demand savings amounted to 7.105 MW at the generator. Existing Residential is comprised of Home Energy Assessment, Green Hea...
AI summary In 2018, the Existing Residential program achieved 22.728 GWh in net energy savings and 7.105 MW in net peak demand savings. The program includes Home Energy Assessment, Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation, with results for each component discussed.
Home Energy Assessment The Evaluator determined that Home Energy Assessment achieved 5.724 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.600 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator with 791 participants in 2018. Both the evaluated ener...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment program achieved 5.724 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.600 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, but these figures were 13% lower than those tracked by ENS. The discrepancy was due to updated overestimation ratios and an adjustment in the number of unconverted D assessment participants.
Green Heat The 2018 Green Heat participation level was much higher than in previous years with 3,055 measures installed. MSHPs were still the most popular measure, accounting for 92 percent of measures installed. The Evaluator found that t...
AI summary In 2018, the Green Heat program saw high participation with 3,055 measures installed, primarily mini-split heat pumps. The program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings. However, evaluated net energy and peak demand savings were lower than tracked values due to a decrease in the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) and differences in participant selection processes.
Efficient Product Installation In 2018, Efficient Product Installation achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings. In total, 10,813 households participated in Efficient Product Installation in 201...
AI summary In 2018, the Efficient Product Installation program achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings, with 10,813 households participating. Participation declined due to fewer potential participants, but ENS offered incentives like free clotheslines and LED holiday lights to encourage participation. Savings were slightly lower than tracked values due to adjustments in unitary savings and NTGR.
New Residential New Residential, comprised of New Home Construction and the Passive House pilot, achieved net energy savings of 4.515 GWh and net peak demand savings of 1.278 MW at the generator in 2018.
AI summary New Residential, including New Home Construction and the Passive House pilot, achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2018, with 4.515 GWh of net energy savings and 1.278 MW of net peak demand savings at the generator.
New Home Construction A total of 652 participants completed projects and generated electrical savings under New Home Construction in 2018, including seven participants who completed a project through the Passive House pilot. Combined, New...
AI summary In 2018, 652 participants in the New Home Construction program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, with Passive House pilot participants contributing as well. However, evaluated savings were 3% lower than tracked values due to updated overestimation ratios. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for regular participants increased from 0.90 to 0.95, while Passive House participants saw a drop from 0.90 to 0.39.
Efficient Product Rebates Efficient Product Rebates comprises one component, Business Energy Rebates. In 2018, Business Energy Rebates achieved 75.298 MWh in net energy savings and 11.327 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator.
AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates program includes Business Energy Rebates, which in 2018 achieved 75.298 MWh in net energy savings and 11.327 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator.
Business Energy Rebates Business Energy Rebates delivers incentives through two services, namely Mail-in and Instant Rebates. In 2018, a total of 366 Mail-in projects were implemented by 257 unique participants. For Instant Rebates, a tota...
AI summary Business Energy Rebates delivers incentives through Mail-in and Instant Rebates. In 2018, the program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings, but evaluated savings were lower than tracked values due to adjustments in gross savings and a slight decrease in the net-to-gross ratio.
Custom Incentives In 2018, Custom Incentives achieved 14.674 GWh in net energy savings and 1.440 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator through its three components, namely Custom, Energy Management Information Systems, and Strateg...
AI summary In 2018, Custom Incentives achieved significant energy and demand savings through its three components: Custom, Energy Management Information Systems, and Strategic Energy Management, contributing 14.674 GWh in net energy savings and 1.440 MW in net peak demand savings.
Custom In 2018, the suite of services offered through Custom was broken down as follows: Retrofit; New Construction; and Building Optimization. Overall, 79 projects generated savings, 69 of which were completed. The Evaluator determined th...
AI summary In 2018, Custom's services generated 11.603 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.200 MW in net peak demand savings. However, evaluated gross energy savings were 13% below the tracked value due to significant reductions in New Construction and Building Optimization. The NTGR was revised downward, with peak demand savings decreasing by 31% below the tracked value.
Strategic Energy Management Four participants generated savings in 2018, all of whom were new participants. The Evaluator determined that Strategic Energy Management achieved 1.455 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.190 MW in net p...
AI summary Strategic Energy Management achieved 1.455 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.190 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018. However, savings were 8% below tracked values due to untracked capital project savings and an adjustment from revised savings on a lighting project. Net savings were 13% below tracked values due to these adjustments.
Direct Installation Direct Installation comprises one program component, Small Business Energy Solutions. In 2018, Small Business Energy Solutions achieved 9.589 GWh in net energy savings and 1.441 MW in net peak demand savings at the gene...
AI summary The Direct Installation program includes Small Business Energy Solutions, which achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2018. This highlights the program's effectiveness in reducing energy consumption for small businesses.
Small Business Energy Solutions A total of 529 Small Business Energy Solutions projects were completed in 2018, which represented a 30 percent increase over 2017. The tracked gross energy savings were adjusted downward by 8 percent as a re...
AI summary In 2018, 529 Small Business Energy Solutions projects were completed, showing a 30% increase over 2017. Adjustments were made to energy savings due to discrepancies found during site visits, with gross energy savings reduced by 8% and gross peak demand savings by 35%. The evaluated net energy savings were slightly below tracked values, but the evaluated net peak demand savings were 29% higher than tracked values.
3.1.3 Codes and Standards The Evaluator focused on the impacts on the Nova Scotia market of federal and provincial regulations such as the Natural Resources Canada Amendment 13 regarding the introduction of minimum energy performance stand...
AI summary The Evaluator examined the impact of federal and provincial regulations, such as Natural Resources Canada Amendment 13, on the Nova Scotia energy market. The analysis highlights energy and peak demand savings from codes and standards, distinguishing them from ENS program savings based on efficiency improvements.
3.2 Net-to-gross Ratio The NTGRs, outlined in Table 5 and Table 6 above, were applied to the gross savings to estimate net savings. NTGRs were established based on the levels of free-ridership and, in some cases, spillover. NTGR estimation...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) used to estimate net savings from energy efficiency programs. The NTGR accounts for free-ridership and spillover effects, with free-ridership levels determined through surveys and interviews. Spillover was assessed by evaluating additional energy efficiency measures taken by participants and market effects for specific programs like Instant Savings and New Home Construction.
3.3 Lifetime Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed the effective useful life values for measures offered by ENS and their associated lifetime energy savings. The Evaluator found that the DSM portfolio generated 1,778.605 GWh in lifetime en...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed the effective useful life (EUL) of energy efficiency measures in ENS's DSM portfolio, finding that the portfolio generated 1,778.605 GWh in lifetime energy savings. Building envelope measures, such as insulation, had longer EULs and contributed more to lifetime savings, while lighting measures had shorter EULs and contributed less.
Table 9: 2018 Evaluated Avoided GHG Emissions DSM Program Program Component Avoided GHG Emissions (CO2 eq Tonnes) Residential Residential Efficient Products Appliance Retirement 1,628 Rebates Instant Savings 13,434 Home Energy Assessment 3...
AI summary Table 9 presents the 2018 evaluated avoided greenhouse gas emissions from various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. The table includes contributions from residential, BNI, and codes & standards programs, with a total of 107,244 CO2 equivalent tonnes of avoided emissions.
4.2 Annual Savings Performance Table 11 presents the ENS planned savings,4 evaluated results, and the variances resulting from the 2018 evaluation.
AI summary Table 11 in section 4.2 presents the ENS planned savings, evaluated results, and variances from the 2018 evaluation, highlighting the performance of annual savings in the context of energy efficiency programs.
Table 12: 2016-2018 DSM Net Savings Targets and Evaluated Results DSM Program As Approved Target Savings Evaluated Results Variance GWh MW MW GWh (%) MW (%) Residential Residential Efficient Products Rebates 37.6 3.3 84.540 13.085 125% 295...
AI summary Residential demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia achieved 174.788 GWh in net energy savings between 2016 and 2018. The Residential Efficient Products Rebates program exceeded its target by 125%, while the Existing Residential program missed its target by 38%. The New Residential program slightly exceeded its target by 1%.
5 MARKET EVOLUTION Since the 2017 evaluation, market indicators were analyzed and monitored for three distinct measures in three distinct program components to identify when various program component offerings should be adapted or removed....
AI summary Since 2017, market indicators for three program components—Instant Savings, Business Energy Rebates, and Green Heat—have been analyzed to assess market evolution and determine when program offerings should be adapted or removed based on trends in free-ridership, market share, and prices.
Instant Savings: LED lamps ENS has been active in the Nova Scotia residential LED market since 2011 through Instant Savings. A socket study conducted in 2016 indicated that residential LED lamp socket saturation was 21 percent for permanen...
AI summary ENS has been promoting LED lamp adoption in Nova Scotia through the Instant Savings program since 2011. LED lamp shipments to Atlantic Canada increased significantly between 2016 and 2017, with A-type bulbs dominating. Prices have decreased over time, and the market is approaching maturity. A-type lamps are now more competitive, leading to the removal of rebates in 2019. A 39% free-ridership level was identified in 2018.
Green Heat: Mini-split Heat Pumps In October 2015, Green Heat was expanded to include MSHPs. The addition of MSHPs considerably boosted participation as soon as the measure was introduced. In 2017, Green Heat underwent a series of changes,...
AI summary The Green Heat program was expanded in 2015 to include mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs), leading to increased participation. By 2017, changes in eligibility, delivery processes, and incentives further boosted adoption. MSHPs are now available for both electrically and non-electrically heated homes, and their market share is growing, with nearly 80% of 2017 sales being Green Heat-qualified. The market is transitioning to a maturity phase.
6 RECOMMENDATIONS Once again, the Evaluator commends ENS on its ability to quickly and effectively implement the recommendations formulated and submitted as part of past evaluations. The 2018 evaluation revealed that two-thirds of former r...
AI summary The Evaluator commends ENS for implementing past recommendations but notes that strategies to engage participants in non-lighting energy efficiency measures are not fully effective. Lighting measures still account for most savings, and ENS is discontinuing support for certain high-saving measures starting in 2019.
Table 15: Crosscutting Recommendation on ENS Programs No. Recommendation CR-R1. Monitor the market evolution for lighting products that were recently removed from ENS offerings. The recent changes to lighting product eligibility in Instant...
AI summary The recommendation suggests monitoring the market evolution for lighting products recently removed from ENS offerings. Changes to lighting product eligibility in Instant Savings and Business Energy Rebates may significantly impact savings. The Evaluator advises ENS to collect timely data on market evolution to enable quick adjustments if necessary.
Table 16: Recommendations on Residential Program Components No. Recommendation IS-R1. Perform a socket study through on-site visits to document energy savings potential related to lighting. Market data point to increasingly high penetratio...
AI summary The text recommends conducting a socket study through on-site visits to assess the remaining energy savings potential related to lighting in Nova Scotia homes, given the high penetration of LED lamps and fixtures. This study would provide valuable data for residential lighting program components.
Table 17: Recommendations on Business, Non-profit and Institutional Program Components No. Recommendation BER-R3. Investigate ways to liaise more clients with non-lighting contractors. Contractors are key players in achieving the goal of i...
AI summary The recommendation suggests investigating ways to connect more clients with non-lighting contractors to promote non-lighting energy efficiency projects, as fewer participants have go-to non-lighting contractors compared to lighting contractors.
No. Recommendation CUSTOM-R2. Further engage new and existing SPs and make them stronger advocates for New Construction. Interviewed SPs often could not accurately recall their membership status with ENS' Efficiency Trade Network (ETN). In...
AI summary The recommendation suggests that ENS should further engage new and existing Service Providers (SPs) and strengthen their advocacy for New Construction. SPs often lack awareness of their membership status with ENS' Efficiency Trade Network (ETN), and the network lacks modellers, architects, and general contractors. Engaging these professionals and trade associations could improve participation in New Construction programs.
APPENDIX I BIBLIOGRAPHY Program Components Bibliographic References ECOX. Technical Information Bulletin No. E-004-EN: SEER, www.ecoxline.com (Last accessed March 3, 2016). EMERA INC., Management's Discussion & Analysis as at February 9, 2...
AI summary This appendix provides a bibliography of references related to energy efficiency programs, appliance standards, and emissions data, including sources such as Natural Resources Canada, Nova Scotia Power, and various studies conducted by organizations like Econoler and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Executive Summary – Appendix Report Program Components Bibliographic References NOVA SCOTIA POWER. Total System Emissions, https://www.nspower.ca/en/home/about us/environmental-commitment/air-emissions-reporting/total-system-emissions-all-...
AI summary The document provides a list of bibliographic references and citations related to energy efficiency, heating systems, and emissions in Nova Scotia. It includes references to Nova Scotia Power, Energy Nova Scotia, and various studies and reports on energy efficiency programs and technologies.
Program Components Bibliographic References DATABASE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY RESOURCES (DEER). DEER 2014 EUL Table, 2014. DNV-GL. Massachusetts Commercial and Industrial Upstream Lighting Program: "In Storage" Lamps Follow-up Study, March 20...
AI summary The text provides a list of bibliographic references related to energy efficiency programs and resources, including databases, studies, and technical manuals. These references are used for program components such as lighting and rebate programs.
Program Components Bibliographic References Small Business Energy Solutions DATABASE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY RESOURCES (DEER). DEER 2014 EUL TABLE, 2014. EMERA INC., "Management's Discussion & Analysis as at February 9, 2018", http://investo...
AI summary The text provides bibliographic references related to the Small Business Energy Solutions program, including sources such as the Database for Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER), EMERA Inc.'s Management Discussion and Analysis, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Uniform Methods Project, and Nova Scotia Power's Total System Emissions report.
Program Bibliographic References Components ENVIRONMENT CANADA. Clean Air Regulatory Agenda: Backgrounder, available at www.ec.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=56D4043B-1&news=295B1964-9737-4F80-B064-B3088D991 0BE (Last accessed February 6, 201...
AI summary The document provides a list of bibliographic references related to energy efficiency programs and regulations, including reports from Environment Canada, the Illuminating Engineering Society, and the National Research Council of Canada. These references are used to support discussions on energy efficiency and lighting standards.
Margin of Error of the Installation Rates What follows is a description of the steps followed by the Evaluator to calculate this margin of error, using the example of the installation rate for light-emitting diode (LED) lamps in EPI.
AI summary This section describes the method used by the Evaluator to calculate the margin of error for the installation rate of LED lamps in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program.
Calculation of the Weighted Average of Installation Rates The weighted average was calculated by using the following formula: $$Weighted \ Average \ IR = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N} Installation \ Rate_i \times Number \ of \ Tracked \ LED \ Lamps...
AI summary The weighted average installation rate for LED lamps was calculated using a formula that considers the installation rate for each household and the number of tracked LED lamps, resulting in an overall rate of 98%.
Calculation of the Weighted Standard Deviation Since the overall installation rate is based on a weighted average, the Evaluator also used the weighted standard deviation of the installation rate for the calculation instead of the standard...
AI summary The weighted standard deviation of the installation rate for LED lamps was calculated using a specific formula. The weighted average installation rate was used instead of the standard deviation, with N representing the number of on-site visits where tracked LED lamps were present. N was 110, but due to one instance where the number of tracked LED lamps was zero, N' became 109, and the weighted standard deviation was calculated as 0.085.
Calculation of the Weighted Average of Adjustment Ratios The weighted average was calculated by using the following formula and applying the adjustment ratios and the tracked energy savings generated by lighting measures: $$Weighted\ Avera...
AI summary The weighted average adjustment ratio (AR) for lighting measures was calculated as 0.927 using a formula that multiplies each measure's adjustment ratio by its tracked energy savings and divides the sum by the total tracked energy savings. This calculation was based on 73 evaluated measures.
Calculation of the Margin of Error The margin of error of the lighting measures' adjustment ratio was established by using the following formula, which applies to samples drawn from a small population (defined as being less than 10 times t...
AI summary The margin of error for the lighting measures' adjustment ratio was calculated using a specific formula, resulting in a 6.4% margin of error. This calculation was applied to programs such as Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES), BER Mail-In service, and Custom (Retrofit service) in 2018.
Margin of Error for Measured Energy Consumption The Evaluator used the margin of error calculation of the unitary savings value established for mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) installed through Green Heat in fully electrically heated househo...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated the margin of error for measured energy consumption using the unitary savings value of mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) installed through Green Heat in fully electrically heated households in 2017. This methodology was used to determine the margins of error for metered results.
Calculation of the Standard Deviation Since the simple average was used to establish the unitary savings value of MSHPs, the Evaluator used the standard deviation. The following formula was used to calculate the standard deviation. The sta...
AI summary The standard deviation of the unitary savings value for mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) installed in fully electrically heated households was calculated as 0.149 kWh/Btu/h using a formula provided by the Evaluator.
Custom Retrofit Free-ridership algorithm Low Free-ridership Participant High Free-ridership Participant Average Free-ridership Participant Questions Calculation Algorithm Answer Calc. Result Answer Calc. Result Answer Calc. Result likeliho...
AI summary The text presents a table related to the Custom Retrofit program, focusing on free-ridership algorithm calculations. It includes questions and corresponding calculation algorithms to assess the likelihood of participants implementing energy efficiency measures without financial incentives, along with scores derived from their responses.
FRtotal= 12% Sp illo r A lgo rith ve m Ex le rtic ipa nt am p pa illo r th is y sp ve (no wi th ne r) ea Ca lcu lat ion Al rith go m Ca lcu lati on Qu tio es ns An sw er Re sul t SO 1. H u in sta lled ad diti l en ffic ien ot her ave yo on...
AI summary The document presents a calculation table assessing the spillover effects of additional energy efficiency measures implemented through a program. It includes questions and responses related to the installation of energy efficiency measures, financial rebates, and the overall spillover level of the program component, which is reported as 0%.
2018 DSM Evaluation Report Evaluated savings Gross and net energy or peak demand savings calculated by the Evaluator using the parameters (unitary savings values, installation rates, interactive effects, net-to-gross ratio, etc.) validated...
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report defines key terms related to demand-side management (DSM) programs, including evaluated savings, free-ridership, gross savings, and installation rates. It outlines how energy efficiency measures impact energy consumption, participant behavior, and market dynamics.
6.2 Fo llow-up on 2017 Evaluation Report Recommendations 33 Table 29: Number of Rebated Products Sold Under Instant Savings, 2017-2018 35 Table 30: Retailer Satisfaction with Aspects of Instant Savings 40 Table 31: Retailer Satisfaction wi...
AI summary The text presents tables related to the evaluation of the Instant Savings program, focusing on rebated products sold, retailer satisfaction, unitary savings values, peak demand-to-energy ratios, and revised effective useful life values for lighting products from 2017 to 2018.
Table 40: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for Instant Savings 59 Table 41: Comparison of Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator 61 Table 42: ENS Rebated LED Lamp Replacement Intentio...
AI summary The document provides a list of tables and figures that evaluate energy and peak demand savings by product category, compare tracked and evaluated savings, and analyze participation and pricing in residential efficient product rebate programs. It includes data on LED lamp replacements, free-ridership levels, and program planning factors.
Table 1: Overall Participation and Savings for Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings ARet Energy Savings 4.568 GWh 0.58 2.657 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings1 5,595 appliances 35.043 GWh 0.57...
AI summary Table 1 provides data on participation levels and savings from residential efficient product rebates, including energy savings, peak demand savings, and net savings. The table also includes a section on appliance retirement, indicating the focus on retiring inefficient appliances to improve energy efficiency.
ARet Performance ARet aimed to achieve 3.1 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.4 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that ARet achieved 2.657 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.37...
AI summary ARet achieved 2.657 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.378 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, with a total of 5,595 inefficient appliances retired or replaced. Savings decreased slightly compared to 2017 due to a reduction in the number of retired freezers.
ARet Energy Savings For the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator revised the unitary savings values of appliances retired through ARet and HomeWarming using a methodology similar to that used in previous evaluations, except that induced consumpt...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of ARet Energy Savings revised unitary savings values for retired appliances, using 2017 metering data due to inconsistencies in 2018 data. Net unitary savings for refrigerators and freezers decreased, while those for air conditioners and small appliances increased. The equivalent net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) was calculated using updated free-ridership and spillover values.
Table 3: Comparison of ARet Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 4.736 GWh 4.736 GWh 0.58 2.763 GWh Evaluation Results 4.568 GW...
AI summary Table 3 compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program, showing initial and adjusted gross savings, NTGR, and net savings for energy and peak demand. Tracked savings from ENS and evaluation results are presented with slight differences in values.
ARet Recommendations Despite operating in the market for several years, ARet continues to achieve considerable levels of participation and savings by encouraging the retirement of inefficient appliances. In addition to the general recommen...
AI summary The ARet program continues to achieve high participation and savings by retiring inefficient appliances. Two key recommendations are made: continuing metering activities with proper protocol and developing a heat gun usage protocol to ensure accurate data collection and proper identification of non-working appliances.
Instant Savings Instant Savings is carried out with the help of one delivery agent (DA) and participating retailers to offer rebates to consumers on the purchase of various energy efficient products that include ENERGY STAR® certified ligh...
AI summary Instant Savings is a program that provides rebates for energy-efficient products through a delivery agent and participating retailers. The program expanded in 2018 to include additional products like air purifiers and dehumidifiers. Evaluations were conducted through documentation reviews, retailer interviews, participant surveys, and savings reviews.
Instant Savings Performance Instant Savings aimed to achieve 16.2 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.1 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that Instant Savings achieved 21.930 GWh in net...
AI summary In 2018, the Instant Savings program achieved significant energy and demand savings, exceeding its targets. It sold a large number of energy-efficient products, particularly LED lamps, though there was a decline in A-type LED lamp sales. The program also showed success in diversifying product offerings beyond A-type lamps.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report Similar to previous years, the participant intercept survey indicated that ENS marketing was the most common way for participants to find out a...
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that ENS marketing, particularly in-store promotions, was the primary way participants learned about the Instant Savings program. Retailers noted that Instant Savings had a moderate influence on consumer choices for LED lighting fixtures, with energy consumption being the most important factor in purchase decisions.
Instant Savings Energy Savings Using a combination of program data, engineering algorithms, and values from the technical literature, the Evaluator validated the unitary savings values used by ENS for each product category rebated through...
AI summary The Evaluator updated unitary savings values for Instant Savings program products, particularly ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps, and measured the Net Total Gross Savings (NTGR) for these products. The evaluation found higher free-ridership and spillover rates than in 2017, indicating that more participants would have purchased LED lamps without the program discount. Future evaluations will need to assess free-ridership for other product categories.
Table 4: Instant Savings Net-to-gross Ratio Product Category Free-ridership Spillover NTGR LED Lamps 39% 25% 0.86 All Other Products - - 1.00 In 2018, Instant Savings generated 21.930 GWh in net energy savings and 2.572 MW in net peak dema...
AI summary Table 4 presents the Instant Savings Net-to-gross Ratio (NTGR) for different product categories, with LED lamps having an NTGR of 0.86 and all other products having an NTGR of 1.00. In 2018, Instant Savings achieved 21.930 GWh in net energy savings and 2.572 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator.
Table 5: Comparison of Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Revised Gross Savings NTGR Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 23.653 GWh 23.653 GWh 0.84 19.967 GWh Evaluation Results 24.262 GWh 2...
AI summary Table 5 compares instant savings tracked by ENS and evaluated savings at the generator for energy and peak demand. The table includes initial and revised gross savings, NTGR values, and net savings for each category.
Market Evolution ENS has been active in the LED market since 2011 through Instant Savings. For a second year, the Evaluator completed a market evolution assessment to inform the level of LED lamp market adoption in Nova Scotia. The popular...
AI summary ENS has been active in the LED market since 2011 through the Instant Savings program. Market evolution assessments show that LED lamp shipments in Nova Scotia have increased, with A-type lamps remaining popular. LED prices have stabilized after a decline since 2012, and product availability has improved.
Instant Savings Recommendations The evaluation revealed that Instant Savings again succeeded to achieve high levels of participation and savings in 2018. Some indicators such as low LED prices and a slight decrease in A-type LED lamp sales...
AI summary The 2018 Instant Savings program achieved high participation and savings, but A-type LED lamps have reached market maturity, leading to the removal of rebates in 2019. Challenges include diversifying product offerings and monitoring LED market indicators to stay informed about market changes.
Table 6: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component 2017 2018 Program Program Component Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R...
AI summary Table 6 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in the residential and business energy efficiency programs. It includes process and impact evaluations for various initiatives such as appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and strategic energy management.
1 ARET OVERVIEW This evaluation report first discusses the ARet evaluation results and then the results from the Instant Savings evaluation. This section describes ARet, follows up on the 2017 evaluation recommendations and gives an overvi...
AI summary This section provides an overview of the ARet evaluation, discusses its results, and follows up on 2017 evaluation recommendations. It also outlines the program's participation history.
1.1 Description Through ARet, ENS promotes the retirement of old, inefficient household appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, room air conditioners, and small refrigerators or freezers. ARet educates Nova Scotians about the cost of m...
AI summary ARet is a program by Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) that promotes the retirement of old, inefficient household appliances. It offers financial incentives and free pick-up services, managed by a delivery agent. The program also includes appliance recycling and collaborates with other initiatives like HomeWarming and DSM funds. In 2018, it aimed for 3.1 GWh in electricity savings and 0.4 MW in peak demand savings.
1.2 Follow-up on 2017 Evaluation Report Recommendations ARet was evaluated in 2017 and recommendations were made by the Evaluator for its improvement. Table 7 below provides a brief summary of the implementation status of each recommendati...
AI summary The 2017 evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program outlined recommendations for improvement, and Table 7 summarizes the implementation status of these recommendations.
1.3 Participation History In 2018, 5,275 appliances were retired through ARet, including 3,874 refrigerators, 1,166 freezers, 114 air conditioning units and 121 small refrigerators or freezers.3 Additionally, 60 refrigerators, 165 freezers...
AI summary In 2018, 5,595 appliances were retired or replaced through ARet and HomeWarming, resulting in 4.568 GWh of gross energy savings and 0.640 MW of gross peak demand savings. Since 2012, 46,436 inefficient appliances have been retired and recycled. The number of retired appliances has remained fairly constant since 2015, suggesting ARet remains effective.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report For evaluation activities that were based on a sample and yielded quantitative results, the Evaluator aimed to achieve a maximum margin of erro...
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the methodology used to evaluate the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program, focusing on statistical sampling and margin of error calculations. The Evaluator aimed for a 10% margin of error at a 90% confidence level to ensure precision in the evaluation of program outcomes.
Participant Survey In October 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with a total of 200 participants. The average length of the survey was nine minutes. All five types of appliances covered by ARet (refrigerators, freezers, air conditione...
AI summary In October 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with 200 participants to gather feedback on the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program. The survey covered appliance usage, replacement, satisfaction, and demographics. The margin of error was 5.7% at a 90% confidence level. The report also notes that the 2018 metering results were not used for this evaluation.
Unitary Savings Review For ARet, the Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings of the retired refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners and small appliances based on the metering data collected by ENS and information found in the literature o...
AI summary The Unitary Savings Review assesses energy savings from appliance retirements through data collected by ENS and ARet. It considers factors like free-ridership and secondary market impacts, and uses survey data to calculate net energy savings per unit. The review includes data from 4,633 participants who retired at least one appliance.
4 ARET IMPACT EVALUATION This section presents the findings of the metering review and the results of the impact evaluation for 2018, which are aimed at determining gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary This section evaluates the impact of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program in 2018, focusing on gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings determined through a metering review.
uses of these differences, the Evaluator concluded that the cause was likely the uncontrolled room temperature. In fact, the average metered room temperature in 2018 was nearly 3°C lower than in 2017. Consequently, the Evaluator elected to...
AI summary The Evaluator noted that differences in energy consumption were likely due to uncontrolled room temperature changes, with 2018 temperatures being 3°C lower than in 2017. As a result, the Evaluator relied on 2017 data for average energy consumption, confirming that the average power factor used was appropriate based on 2018 measurements.
4.3 Refrigerator Unitary Savings This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to determine the unitary savings of full-sized refrigerators retired through ARet in 2018. The Evaluator revised the gross unitary savings value by updati...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of unitary savings for full-sized refrigerators retired through the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program in 2018. Key parameters revised include average energy consumption of retired and replacement refrigerators and part-use factors, resulting in adjusted annual energy consumption values of 687 kWh and 265 kWh, respectively.
Table 14: Final Energy Consumption Values for Freezers Measured Consumption (kWh/year) Part-use Factor Final Consumption (kWh/year) Retired Freezers 1,312 0.72 945 Replacement Freezers 300 0.72 216 Two effects were considered to calculate...
AI summary Table 14 presents final energy consumption values for retired and replacement freezers, with 945 kWh/year and 216 kWh/year respectively. The calculation of net unitary savings considers free-ridership and secondary market impacts, resulting in an overall net savings of 450 kWh per retired freezer.
Table 15: Net Savings per Freezer Would Have Kept Have Discard % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative % Overall Ener Consun (kWh/y nption Savings Alternative Unit Туре Proportion Without ARet With ARet Net Reduction Yes 31 31% 945 0 94...
AI summary Table 15 presents net savings per freezer, analyzing scenarios involving appliance retirement and alternative unit acquisition. It includes data on percentages, savings, and energy consumption, with various categories such as 'Would Have Kept,' 'Have Discard,' and 'Alternative Unit' being considered.
4.5 Room Air Conditioner Unitary Savings This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to evaluate the unitary savings of room air conditioners retired in 2018. To revise the unitary savings value for air conditioners, the Evaluator...
AI summary This subsection evaluates the unitary savings of room air conditioners retired in 2018. The Evaluator revised parameters such as retired capacity, hours of operation, and SEER. The average annual energy consumption for retired units was 218 kWh, and for replacement units, it was 156 kWh. Net savings were calculated considering free-ridership and secondary market impacts, resulting in an overall savings of 115 kWh per unit retired.
4.6 Small Appliance Retirement This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to determine the unitary savings of small refrigerators and small freezers retired through ARet in 2018. 12 NRCan's Office of Energy Efficiency. Air Conditi...
AI summary This subsection discusses the parameters used to determine the unitary savings of small refrigerators and freezers retired through ARet in 2018. The Evaluator updated key parameters, including a part-use factor of 0.42, based on participant responses about appliance usage patterns.
Table 18 and Table 19 summarize the unitary savings calculations for the small appliances retired through ARet.
AI summary Table 18 and Table 19 present unitary savings calculations for small appliances retired through the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program.
4.7.1 Refrigerator Replacement Using an annual per-cubic-foot consumption of 58.9 kWh/cu. ft, the Evaluator established that old refrigerators consume on average 1,121 kWh per year. This calculation is based on the metered consumption of r...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated the energy consumption of old and new refrigerators, finding that replacing an old refrigerator with an ENERGY STAR certified model saves 773 kWh annually. This calculation uses the average size of retired refrigerators, an occupant adjustment factor, and the unitary energy consumption of new models.
4.7.2 Freezer Replacement To establish the unitary savings of freezers replaced through HomeWarming, the Evaluator used the same approach as for refrigerators replaced through HomeWarming. The Evaluator used the average annual consumption...
AI summary The document calculates the unitary savings from replacing old freezers with new efficient models through the HomeWarming program. It uses average consumption values for both old and new freezers to determine energy savings, resulting in a calculated unitary savings of 1,385 kWh per year.
4.7.3 Dehumidifier Replacement The Evaluator reviewed the tracked unitary savings value used by ENS for dehumidifiers. All parameters used were still applicable and the Evaluator therefore maintained the unitary savings of 660 kWh per year...
AI summary The Evaluator confirmed the unitary savings value of 660 kWh per year for replacing old dehumidifiers with new models, as established by ENS in the 2017 evaluation, and found all parameters still applicable.
4.8 Summary of Unitary Savings Values Table 20 below presents the tracked and revised savings values for each appliance type retired through ARet or replaced under HomeWarming in 2018. As previously mentioned, the same unitary savings as t...
AI summary Table 20 shows the tracked and revised savings values for appliances retired through ARet or replaced under HomeWarming in 2018. The same unitary savings values applied to appliances retired through ARet were also used for four appliances retired from HRCE schools.
Appliance Type Gross Unitary Savings (kWh/yr) Net Unitary Savings (kWh/yr) Tracked Revised Tracked Revised Refrigerator (ARet) 751 687 410 389 Freezer (ARet) 863 945 465 450 Room Air Conditioner (ARet) 215 218 66 115 Small Refrigerator (AR...
AI summary The table presents gross and net unitary savings for various appliances retired through ARet and HomeWarming programs. The gross unitary savings for refrigerators retired through ARet was revised downward due to a lower part-use factor from 2018 survey results.
4.9 Peak Demand Savings Peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand of the electricity system. The projected electricity-demand peak period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. in...
AI summary Peak demand savings are calculated based on the timing of demand savings relative to the peak electricity demand period in Nova Scotia, which occurs between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. during December to February on non-holiday weekdays. The Evaluator validated the method used by Navigant to calculate on-peak demand-to-energy ratios for appliance retirement (ARET) and assumed a zero ratio for air conditioners due to their unlikely operation during peak times.
4.10 Interactive Effects Interactive effects occur in a conditioned space when an implemented energy-efficiency measure has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements in the system, such as heating and cooling equipment. In the...
AI summary The document discusses interactive effects of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program in Nova Scotia, where retiring inefficient appliances can impact heating and cooling loads. While some negative effects are expected during heating periods, these are partially offset by positive effects during cooling periods. The Evaluator concluded that these interactive effects are negligible and set the factor at 0 percent.
4.11 Effective Useful Life For 2018, the evaluated equivalent effective useful life (EUL) values correspond to those established through a thorough literature review conducted as part of the 2017 evaluation. These values remain valid in 20...
AI summary The document discusses the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) values for appliances in 2018, which were based on a 2017 literature review. These values were applied to calculate gross and net lifetime energy savings, with no changes made by the Evaluator. References to Statistics Canada and various TRMs are included.
Table 22: ARet Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values Appliance Tracked Equivalent EUL (years) Revised Equivalent EUL (years) Revised Gross Lifetime Unitary Savings (kWh) Refrigerator Retirement (ARet) 8 No change 5,496 Freezer Retirement...
AI summary Table 22 presents equivalent effective useful life values for various appliance retirement and replacement programs, including refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners, and dehumidifiers. The table shows no changes in the equivalent effective useful life for most appliances, with specific values provided for each category.
The gross energy and peak demand savings resulting from the retirement of old appliances through ARet (including appliances retired in HRCE schools) and the appliance replacements through HomeWarming are listed in Table 23 below. The total...
AI summary The text discusses energy and peak demand savings from appliance retirements through ARet and HomeWarming programs, providing specific figures and line loss factors applied. It also mentions the contribution of Nova Scotia Power in providing line loss data and calculation methods.
Table 23: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Appliance Type Ap l ia Re ire t t p nc e m en Ho fr ig Re to er a rs Fr ee ze rs Ro A ir om Co d i io t n ne rs Sm l l a Re fr ig to er a rs l Fr Sm l a ee ze rs fr ig Re to er a rs...
AI summary Table 23 provides data on revised gross energy and peak demand savings by appliance type, including the number of units retired, energy savings in kilowatt-hours, and total gross energy savings in gigawatt-hours. The table includes various appliance categories such as refrigerators, freezers, and room air conditioners.
4.13 Participant Spillover For ARet, participant spillover occurs when participants decide to retire or replace other appliances pursuant to participating in the program component and due to its influence. During the telephone survey, part...
AI summary The document discusses participant spillover in the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, where participants retired additional appliances outside the program due to its influence. Savings from these additional retirements were calculated based on disposal methods and influenced by the program. The spillover level was found to be 0 percent in the current survey, compared to 1, 3, and 4 percent in previous years.
4.15 Overall Net Savings The net energy savings were estimated by multiplying the gross savings by the NTGR, as shown in the equation below.
AI summary The net energy savings are calculated by multiplying gross savings by the Net Total Gross Savings (NTGR) factor, as illustrated in the provided equation.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report Net Energy Savings = Gross Energy Savings × NTGRequiv Overall, the total net energy and net peak demand savings for ARet amounted to 2.657 GWh...
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program and Appliance Retirement (ARET) results, showing net energy savings of 2.657 GWh and 0.378 MW, leading to 1,628 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. The report uses Nova Scotia Power's 2017 emissions data to calculate GHG savings.
Table 25: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Appliance Type Appliance Retirement н Refrigerators Freezers Room Air Conditioners Small Refrigerators Small Freezers Refrigerators Freezers Dehumidifiers Total Energy Savings Revis...
AI summary Table 25 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by appliance type, including energy savings at the meter and generator, line loss factors, and net lifetime energy savings. The table highlights energy savings from appliance retirement programs, such as refrigerators, freezers, and dehumidifiers.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report Table 26 compares the tracked and evaluated savings at the generator.
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report includes Table 26, which compares tracked and evaluated savings at the generator level, providing insights into the effectiveness of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
5 ARET RECOMMENDATIONS Despite operating in the market for several years, ARet continues to achieve considerable levels of participation and savings by encouraging the retirement of inefficient appliances. In addition to the general recomm...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends continuing metering activities and improving the heat gun usage protocol for the ARet program to ensure accurate data collection and proper identification of non-working appliances.
6.1 Description Instant Savings offers instant cash rebates to consumers who purchase eligible energy efficient products. Instant Savings is carried out with the help of one DA, as well as nine national retailers and 33 independent retaile...
AI summary Instant Savings provides cash rebates for energy-efficient products in Nova Scotia. The program works with a Demand Advisor and multiple retailers. In 2018, rebates were offered during two campaigns, and new products like smart thermostats and air purifiers were added. Rebate amounts for certain products were increased during the fall 2018 campaign.
Table 28: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for Instant Savings 2017 Recommendations Status 2017 Instant-R1. Continue providing program component support to expand the share of LED bulbs in the Nova Scotia residential lighting...
AI summary In 2017, ENS was recommended to shift focus from A-type bulbs to other products with lower market adoption. This was implemented by removing rebates on A-type LED lamps in 2018 and expanding rebates to non-A-type LED lamps, fixtures, and other non-lighting products in 2019.
6.3 Participation History In 2018, a total of 669,550 eligible products were sold in participating stores across Nova Scotia, which represents a small decrease compared to 2017. LED lamps were still the most popular products under Instant...
AI summary In 2018, 669,550 eligible products were sold under the Instant Savings program in Nova Scotia, with LED lamps remaining the most popular. However, sales of A-type LED lamps decreased by 13%, while sales of other rebated products, such as ENERGY STAR certified dehumidifiers and air purifiers, increased significantly.
Table 29: Number of Rebated Products Sold Under Instant Savings, 2017-2018 Product Categories 2017 2018 Variation ENERGY STAR Certified A-type LED lamps 512,096 443,233 13% ENERGY STAR Certified Non-A-type LED lamps 139,872 127,366 9% ENER...
AI summary Table 29 shows the number of rebated products sold under the Instant Savings program from 2017 to 2018. The data indicates a decline in most categories, except for ENERGY STAR Certified LED Fixtures and Appliances, which saw significant increases.
7 INSTANT SAVINGS EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the Instant Savings evaluation are as follows: - › Reporting on participant and partner perspectives - › Calculating program results, namely electrical first-ye...
AI summary The Instant Savings evaluation aims to report on participant and partner perspectives, calculate program results such as energy savings and GHG emissions, and analyze the market evolution of LED lamps. The methodology involved reviewing documentation, meeting with the program manager, and preparing data-collection instruments.
Participant Survey A participant intercept survey was conducted by CRA staff in Halifax with 163 consumers who purchased qualifying LED lamps and 31 who purchased LED fixtures during the fall campaign, for a total of 194 survey participant...
AI summary A participant intercept survey was conducted by CRA staff in Halifax during the 2018 fall campaign, gathering feedback from 194 participants who purchased LED lamps and fixtures. The survey covered topics such as Instant Savings awareness, ENS awareness, and consumer experiences with LED products.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report The intercept survey sample of 194 participants yields a margin of error of ±5.9 percent at a 90 percent confidence level.
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program, noting that an intercept survey with 194 participants has a margin of error of ±5.9 percent at a 90 percent confidence level.
Unitary Savings Review The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used in the tracking sheet for each product category rebated through Instant Savings in 2018. Technical reference manuals (TRMs) and public evaluation reports of juri...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed unitary savings values for products rebated through Instant Savings in 2018, using technical reference manuals, public evaluation reports, and data from participant surveys to revise these values.
Rebate Processing, Tracking and Reporting Retailers offered moderately high levels of satisfaction with the rebate processing, tracking and reporting processes, with an average score of 7.3. Dissatisfaction stemmed from the need to review...
AI summary Retailers expressed moderately high satisfaction with rebate processing, tracking, and reporting, but dissatisfaction arose from the need to review SKUs mid-campaign and the cumbersome reporting process. A retailer suggested a web-based platform to improve consistency and ease of reporting across provinces.
8.1.2 Influence of Instant Savings and Barriers This subsection presents the retailers' opinions on the influence of Instant Savings on various factors relating to LED lamps and fixtures, such as consumer and staff knowledge about the prod...
AI summary This subsection discusses retailers' views on how Instant Savings influences factors related to LED lamps and fixtures, including consumer and staff knowledge, product availability, and barriers preventing consumers from purchasing energy-efficient products.
LED Lamps All retailers were asked to assess the influence of Instant Savings on a variety of factors using a 0 to 10 scale where 0 indicates "no influence at all" and 10 indicates "a great deal of influence". Overall, Instant Savings was...
AI summary Retailers assessed the influence of the Instant Savings program on factors like consumer knowledge, sales staff knowledge, and LED lamp variety. The program was seen as beneficial in educating consumers but had limited impact on sales staff training and product diversity, with some retailers citing store size as a limiting factor.
Table 32: Influence of Instant Savings on LED Lamps 2018 Influence Factors Mean Sample Size Consumer knowledge of LED lamps and technology 8.0 8 Quantity of LED lamps stocked in-store 7.4 8 Variety of LED lamps stocked in-store 7.4 9 Staff...
AI summary Table 32 examines the influence of instant savings on LED lamps, focusing on factors such as consumer knowledge, in-store availability, and staff expertise. The data is based on retailer ratings, with a scale from 0 (not at all influential) to 10 (very influential).
Barriers When asked to identify what prevents consumers from purchasing energy efficient products, retailers identified a variety of barriers. Cost was the most commonly cited barrier and considered the most important impediment to product...
AI summary Retailers identified cost as the primary barrier preventing consumers from purchasing energy-efficient products, with other barriers including limited consumer awareness, product assortment, and style preferences.
8.2 Participant Perspectives An intercept participant survey was conducted as part of the Instant Savings evaluation. A total of 194 interviews were completed with LED purchasers during the 2018 fall campaign. In contrast to previous campa...
AI summary An intercept survey of 194 LED purchasers during the 2018 fall campaign found that 63% were aware of the Instant Savings program, with in-store promotions being the main awareness source. Most respondents already had LED lamps at home, and the average number of lamps purchased increased compared to the previous year. Rebate awareness was high, with in-store signage being the primary way purchasers learned about the program.
9.1 Gross Savings For Instant Savings, gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from eligible energy efficient products being purchased by participants, regardless of why they participated.21 The Evaluator rev...
AI summary Gross savings for Instant Savings are calculated based on changes in energy consumption from eligible energy-efficient products, with the Evaluator revising tracked savings by reviewing unitary savings values and adjusting calculations for LED lamps and fixtures.
9.1.1 Unitary Savings Values The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used in the tracking sheet for each product category rebated through Instant Savings. Using a combination of program data, engineering algorithms, and values fr...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised unitary savings values for various product categories under the Instant Savings program. Adjustments were made based on product popularity, replacement scenarios, and installation feasibility, with changes documented for LED lamps, smart thermostats, load sensing power bars, clotheslines, and large appliances.
Table 33: Summary of Tracked and Revised Unitary Savings Values for Instant Savings Product Tracked Savings (kWh/yr) Revised Savings (kWh/yr) ENERGY STAR Certified LED A-type Lamps 24.9 27.8 ENERGY STAR Certified LED Non-A-type Lamps (R, B...
AI summary Table 33 provides a comparison of tracked and revised unitary savings values for various energy-efficient products under the Instant Savings program, showing changes in energy savings estimates for different categories of lighting, fixtures, and appliances.
9.1.2 Peak Demand Savings Peak demand savings correspond to the demand savings that coincide in time with the peak demand of the electricity system. The projected electricity peak demand period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. f...
AI summary The document discusses methods for calculating peak demand savings for various energy efficiency products in Nova Scotia. It references the Navigant ratios from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, with exceptions for certain products like lighting, outdoor motion sensors, clotheslines, and room air purifiers, each with specific assumptions and ratios applied.
Table 34: Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios by Product Category Product Category Peak Demand to-energy Ratio Source Lighting Products (ENERGY STAR Certified LED Lamps, ENERGY STAR Certified LED Recessed Downlight Fixtures, ENERGY STAR Certified...
AI summary Table 34 presents peak demand-to-energy ratios for various product categories, including lighting products, motion sensors, power bars, thermostats, and appliances. The data is sourced from studies and evaluations, with some values calculated directly by the evaluator. The ratios range from negative to positive values, indicating varying impacts on demand and energy use.
9.1.3 Interactive Effects Interactive effects occur in a home when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of Instant Savings, repl...
AI summary Interactive effects occur when energy efficiency measures, such as replacing incandescent lighting with LED lamps in the Instant Savings program, affect other home energy systems like heating and cooling loads, increasing winter heating and decreasing summer cooling demands.
Lighting Products and Controls The interactive effects factors used by ENS for energy savings are based on a methodology developed by the Evaluator in 2015 and were still valid for 2018. As for peak demand savings, the Evaluator adjusted t...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used by ENS for energy savings, including adjustments made in 2017 to account for interactive effects on peak demand-to-energy ratios for LED lamps, fixtures, and outdoor motion sensors. This approach is further detailed in Table 35, which lists interactive effects factors for indoor lighting products.
Table 35: Interactive Effects Calculations for Lighting Products Installed Indoors Parameter % of Homes25,26 Energy Interactive Effects Factor27 Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Electrical Heating with Air Conditioning 33% x 32% = 11...
AI summary Table 35 presents interactive effects calculations for indoor lighting products, considering different home heating and air conditioning configurations. It shows energy and peak demand interactive effects factors for various scenarios, such as homes with and without electrical heating and air conditioning.
Environment Survey, Primary Heating System, Canada, Provinces and Census Metropolitan Areas , 2015, CANSIM, November 1, 2018. 27 ADS ASSOCIÉS, Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d'économies d'énergie – résidence unifa...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects of energy-efficient lighting products, particularly LED lamps and fixtures, when installed indoors versus outdoors. It references studies and data from Nova Scotia to adjust factors for these effects, including the use of the 2016 Socket Study and tracking sheets from the Instant Savings program.
Table 36: Interactive Effects Factors for LED Lamps, Fixtures and Other Indoor Devices Category of Product Indoor % Outdoor % Energy Interactive Effects Factor Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor ENERGY STAR Certified LED Lamps 92% 8% 9...
AI summary Table 36 presents interactive effects factors for LED lamps, fixtures, and other indoor devices, showing the impact on energy and peak demand based on indoor and outdoor usage percentages. These factors are integrated into peak demand-to-energy ratios for lighting products in Table 37.
Instant Savings 51 28 Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2016 Socket Study, Final Report prepared for Efficiency Nova Scotia, December 2016. 29 Adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratio = peak demand-to-energy ratio × (1 + interactive effects...
AI summary The text references a 2016 study by Corporate Research Associates Inc. on socket efficiency, prepared for Efficiency Nova Scotia. It also discusses an adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratio calculation involving interactive effects factors for peak demand and energy savings.
Table 37: Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios by Lighting Product Category Product Category Peak Demand to-energy Ratio Interactive Effects Factor for Energy Savings Interactive Effects Factor for Peak Demand Savings Adjusted Peak Demand...
AI summary Table 37 presents adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratios for various lighting product categories, including ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps, fixtures, and dimmer switches. The table shows the impact of interactive effects on energy and peak demand savings, with adjusted ratios reflecting these changes.
The Evaluator calculated the annual gross savings based on the revised unitary savings values established for each product sold in 2018. The results are presented in Table 39 further below. Table 39 also presents the gross savings at the g...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated annual gross savings based on revised unitary savings values for products sold in 2018. Table 39 presents these results, including gross energy savings at the generator, estimated using a line loss factor of 1.100 provided by NSP. The gross energy savings at the generator were 24.262 GWh, translating into 208.193 GWh in lifetime savings with a weighted average EUL of 8.6 years.
Table 39: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for Instant Savings LED A- LED Non-A-t ype Lamp LED LED ENER Fixt Dimmer Indoor Motion Sensor with Outdoor Power Bar Product Category type Lamp R, BR and Decorative...
AI summary Table 39 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Instant Savings program, detailing the number of units installed, energy savings, interactive effects, and lifetime energy savings across various lighting and control products.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for Instant Savings (Continued) Product Category Smart Power Bar Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Programmable Thermostat Clothesline Efficient Refrigerator Efficient Clothes Washer...
AI summary The table provides revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Instant Savings program, including data on number of units, energy savings, and peak demand savings across various product categories such as smart power bars, programmable thermostats, and efficient refrigerators.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report The retailer interviews were used to estimate the level of spillover by measuring the market effects attributable to the program component for...
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the spillover effect of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program, particularly the Instant Savings campaign. It found that 81% of LED lamp sales occurred without receiving a rebate, leading to a 25% spillover level, an increase from 16% in 2017. This is attributed to reduced market barriers and broader availability of LED lamps.
9.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are attributable specifically to Instant Savings. Net program component impacts were estimated by applying the overall NTGR presented above to the gross savings, as...
AI summary Net savings from the Instant Savings program are calculated using the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) applied to gross savings. This resulted in 21.930 GWh in net energy savings and 2.572 MW in net peak demand savings. These savings are estimated to avoid 13,434 tonnes of CO2 eq annually, based on Nova Scotia's specific GHG emissions factor.
Table 40: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for Instant Savings LED A- LED Non-A-t ype Lamp LED LED ENER Dimmer Indoor Motion Sensor Outdoor Power Product Category type Lamp R, BR and Decorative Other Recesse...
AI summary Table 40 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Instant Savings program. It includes metrics such as energy savings, net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), line loss factor, and net lifetime energy savings for various lighting and control products.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for Instant Savings (Continued) Product Category Smart Power Bar Heavy-duty Outdoor Timer Programmable Thermostat Clothesline Efficient Refrigerator Efficient Clothes Washer...
AI summary The table presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Instant Savings program, including energy savings at the meter and generator, net lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings. The data includes various product categories and their corresponding savings metrics.
Table 41: Comparison of Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Revised Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 23.653 GWh 23.653 GWh 0.84 19.967 GWh Evaluation Results...
AI summary Table 41 compares instant savings tracked by ENS and evaluated savings at the generator, showing differences in energy and peak demand savings. The table includes initial and revised gross savings, NTGR, and net savings for both energy and peak demand categories.
10 INSTANT SAVINGS MARKET EVOLUTION ENS has been active in the LED lamp market since 2011 through Instant Savings. The 2016 evaluation revealed indicators that market barriers to LED lamps had been reduced, especially for A-type LED lamps....
AI summary ENS has been promoting LED lamps in Nova Scotia through Instant Savings since 2011. Market barriers were reduced by 2016, and a 2017 evaluation provided insights into market adoption. This section updates that data to reflect ongoing market transformation.
10.1.2 LED Lamps Rebated by Instant Savings Figure 13 illustrates the number of LED lamps rebated by Instant Savings since 2013, broken down by lamp type where data is available. A-type lamps continue to account for most of the LED lamps r...
AI summary This section presents data on the number of LED lamps rebated by Instant Savings since 2013, highlighting that A-type lamps make up the majority of rebates. The data is sourced from evaluation reports and 2018 results.
10.1.3 Socket Saturation and Replacement Behaviour No further information with respect to socket saturation has become available since the 2017 evaluation. The 2016 Socket Study31 found that the incidence of households with at least one LE...
AI summary The document discusses the saturation and replacement behavior of LED lamps in Nova Scotia homes. It notes an increase in LED lamp usage since 2011 and a shift in replacement behavior, with more LEDs being used to replace burned-out bulbs rather than for early replacements.
Figure 14 below illustrates the evolution in the price of LED lamps sold through Instant Rebates (before a rebate is applied). From 2012 to 2017, average LED prices decreased from just over $20 in 2012 to about $3.30 in 2017, making LED la...
AI summary The text discusses the evolution of LED lamp prices from 2012 to 2018, showing a significant decrease from over $20 to about $3.30 in 2017, followed by a slight increase to $3.70 in 2018. Factors influencing the price trends include the increasing sales of multipacks and the introduction of LED lamps in discount stores. A-type lamps were the least expensive, while R-type lamps were the most expensive in 2018.
nit price of $3.10 in 2018, while R-type lamps were the most expensive type with an average unit price of $8.62 in 2018. The other lamp types had an average unit price ranging from $5.00 to $6.00. Analyzing average LED lamp prices over the...
AI summary The text discusses the average unit prices of different lamp types, noting that R-type lamps were the most expensive in 2018, while LED lamp prices saw a slight increase in 2018, particularly for BR lamps, which rose from an average price of $4.73 in 2017 to $5.95 in 2018.
Lamp Type 2016 ($) 201732 ($) 2018 ($) A-type 5.26 3.04 3.10 Non A-type 7.55 4.60 5.50 BR 9.78 4.73 5.95 R 10.19 7.36 8.62 Decorative 7.81 4.12 4.98 Table 43: Average LED Prices by Lamp Type
AI summary Table 43 presents average LED prices by lamp type for the years 2016, 2017-2032, and 2018. The table includes various lamp types such as A-type, Non A-type, BR, R, and Decorative, with corresponding price data for each year.
10.1.5 Codes and Standards The ultimate indicator of market transformation is the adoption of more stringent codes and standards. Currently, general service lamps33 are required to meet an efficiency level that corresponds to halogen incan...
AI summary The text discusses the adoption of energy efficiency codes and standards, particularly for general service lamps, and highlights regulatory amendments in Canada and the U.S. that aim to phase out halogen incandescent lamps. It notes that while recent amendments have had minimal impact, future updates may align with U.S. regulations, likely after 2020.
Table 45: Overview of Key Factors in Program Planning Factor Results Market share of LED lamps LED lamp shipments accounted for over half of all lamps shipped to Atlantic Canada in 2017, up considerably from 2016. The mix of LED lamp shipm...
AI summary Table 45 outlines key factors in program planning, focusing on the market share of LED lamps, recent trends in prices and availability, and the likelihood of LED lamps being included in new codes or standards. It highlights the increasing adoption of LED lamps in Nova Scotia and Canada's plans to update energy performance standards.
11 INSTANT SAVINGS RECOMMENDATIONS The evaluation revealed that Instant Savings again succeeded to achieve high levels of participation and savings in 2018. Some indicators such as low LED prices and a slight decrease in A-type LED lamp sa...
AI summary The evaluation of Instant Savings in 2018 showed high participation and savings. A-type LED lamps have matured, leading to the removal of rebates in 2019. The Evaluator recommends a socket study to assess remaining lighting savings potential and continued monitoring of LED market indicators to stay informed about market changes.
12 OVERALL SAVINGS OF THE RESIDENTIAL EFFICIENT PRODUCT PROGRAM Table 46 summarizes the participation levels, as well as gross and net savings for each Residential Efficient Product Rebates program component and the whole program.
AI summary Table 46 summarizes participation levels and gross and net savings for each component of the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, as well as the overall program.
Table 46: Overall Participation and Savings for Residential Efficient Product Rebates Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings ARet Energy Savings 4.568 GWh 0.58 2.657 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 5,595 appliances 35.043 GWh 0.57...
AI summary Table 46 presents data on participation levels and energy savings from residential efficient product rebates, including gross and net savings, as well as the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for different categories such as energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings.
CONCLUSION In 2018, the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program aimed to achieve 19.3 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.5 MW in peak demand savings at the generator. The Evaluator determined that the Residential Efficient Pr...
AI summary In 2018, the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program exceeded its planned energy and peak demand savings, achieving 24.588 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.951 MW in net peak demand savings. Instant Savings was the largest contributor, accounting for 89% of program savings. These savings equate to 15,062 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual avoided GHG emissions.
Instant Savings In 2018, Instant Savings aimed to achieve 16.2 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.1 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator. The Evaluator established that Instant Savings achieved 21.930 GWh in net electrica...
AI summary In 2018, the Instant Savings program exceeded its energy savings targets, achieving 21.930 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.572 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator, surpassing the planned 16.2 GWh and 2.1 MW.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report In 2018, 669,550 products were sold through Instant Savings. This represents fewer sales than in 2017, but the overall savings achieved by Inst...
AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that 669,550 products were sold through Instant Savings, with LED A-type lamps being the most popular. Despite lower sales compared to 2017, higher average savings were achieved. The market for LED lamps is nearing maturity, leading to the decision to remove rebates on A-type lamps starting in 2019. Retailers expressed high satisfaction with the program.
SCREENING QUESTIONS Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? - 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] - 2. No [SAY "Perhaps you can help me anyway." GO TO INTRODUCTION] Hello, my name is _________ from Corporate Research Associates, a Halifax-based survey r...
AI summary This text outlines a screening questionnaire for participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program from 2018. The survey aims to evaluate and improve the program by gathering feedback from participants. It includes prompts to confirm participation and ensure the correct individual is being contacted.
Replacement Section (RE Series) - RE1. Did you replace the [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small stand-alone freezer/air conditioner] that you removed through the program in 2018? - 1. Yes - 2. No [GO TO SPIL...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document contains a series of questions related to the replacement of appliances such as fridges, freezers, and air conditioners. It inquires whether the replacement appliance was new or used, how it was obtained, and whether it was an ENERGY STAR® or high-efficiency model.
Spillover Section (SO Series) - SO1. When the Efficiency Nova Scotia representative came to pick up your [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small stand-alone freezer/air conditioners], did he also pick up any ot...
AI summary This section asks respondents whether an Efficiency Nova Scotia representative collected non-eligible appliances during the pickup of eligible appliances such as fridges, freezers, or air conditioners, with options to confirm or deny and proceed accordingly.
FR7. What is the main reason you chose the Efficiency Nova Scotia program to dispose of your appliance? Reason for Choosing ARet to Dispose of Appliance 2018 Sample Size 129 Convenience/Easy to get rid of 40% Incentive 19% To ensure it was...
AI summary The document asks respondents about their reasons for choosing the Efficiency Nova Scotia program to dispose of appliances and whether they replaced the appliances they turned in. The responses highlight convenience, incentives, and proper disposal as key factors.
RE4. Was the replacement [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small standalone freezer/air conditioner] an ENERGY STAR or high efficiency model? The Replacement 2018 Appliance Was an ENERGY STAR certified or High...
AI summary The text discusses the replacement of various appliances (refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners) with ENERGY STAR or high efficiency models, providing statistics on the percentage of replacements that met these criteria. It also asks whether other ineligible appliances were collected during the process and lists examples of such appliances.
SO6. How many [READ OPTIONS IN ORDER] have you disposed of without receiving an incentive since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? Average Number of Appliances Disposed of Without Receiving 2018 a Rebat...
AI summary The document asks how many appliances have been disposed of without receiving an incentive since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. It includes a table showing the average number of appliances disposed of without receiving a rebate for various categories.
S2. Using a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 is "not at all satisfied" and 10 is "completely satisfied" how would you rate your satisfaction with the program overall? Satisfaction with ARet Overall 2015 2016 2018 Sample Size 200 197 200 8-10 93%...
AI summary The text provides survey results on satisfaction with the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program. Participants rated their satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 10, with high satisfaction levels (mean 9.4-9.6) and low dissatisfaction. Reasons for dissatisfaction include issues with the time taken for appliance pick-up, small incentives, and difficulties in scheduling.
APPENDIX IV ARET: UNITARY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS This appendix presents the detailed calculations and assumptions used to establish the unitary savings for appliances retired through Appliance Retirement or replaced through Instant Savings.
AI summary This appendix provides the detailed calculations and assumptions used to determine unitary savings for appliances retired through Appliance Retirement or replaced through Instant Savings programs.
Gross Unitary Savings The Evaluator revised the gross unitary savings value by updating the following key parameters: - › The average energy consumption of retired refrigerators - › The average energy consumption of replacement refrigerato...
AI summary The Evaluator updated the gross unitary savings value by revising key parameters, including the average energy consumption of retired and replacement refrigerators and part-use factors.
Average Energy Consumption of Retired Refrigerators As mentioned in the main report, the Evaluator relied on the results of 2017 metering activities to estimate the average annual per-cubic-foot energy consumption values of the appliances...
AI summary The Evaluator estimated the average annual per-cubic-foot energy consumption of retired refrigerators in 2018 using 2017 metering data. Refrigerators were classified by manufacture year based on energy efficiency regulations introduced in 1994 and 2001. The overall average consumption was calculated as 51.6 kWh/cu. ft.
Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Refrigerators The average annual energy consumption of replacement refrigerators was used to take into account the effects of the secondary market. To do so, refrigerators were divided into new and...
AI summary The average annual energy consumption of replacement refrigerators was analyzed, dividing them into new and used categories with high and standard efficiencies. Three energy consumption levels were assigned based on the Uniform Methods Project methodology, assuming new standard-efficiency refrigerators consume similar energy to high-efficiency ones.
\ The sum does not equal 100% due to rounding. The "New - Efficient" energy consumption value was established by multiplying (1) the average percubic-foot energy consumption of refrigerators sold through Instant Savings in 2018 (21.1 kWh/c...
AI summary The document calculates energy consumption values for refrigerators under the Instant Savings program, using average consumption data from 2018 and Canadian energy-efficiency standards. It also references the energy consumption of the most recent age category of retired refrigerators for the 'Used - Standard' level.
Table 4: Average Annual Consumption for Refrigerator Replacement Type of Replacement Annual Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Proportion New High-efficiency Refrigerator 359 81% Used High-efficiency Refrigerator 400 14% New Standard-efficiency...
AI summary Table 4 presents the average annual energy consumption for different types of refrigerator replacements, highlighting the energy efficiency differences between new and used high-efficiency and standard-efficiency refrigerators. The data shows that new high-efficiency refrigerators consume significantly less energy compared to used standard-efficiency models.
Part-use Factor Part-use factors 8 are applied to adjust the savings calculations to account for the fact that not all refrigerators are plugged in year-round. The secondary refrigerator in a principal residence or the primary refrigerator...
AI summary The document discusses the use of part-use factors to adjust savings calculations for refrigerators in the Appliance Retirement program. The 2018 survey data is used to determine how often refrigerators are in use, influencing the part-use factor applied. The overall part-use factor in 2018 was 0.82, similar to 2016. The use of non-recycled refrigerators is also considered in the calculation.
Table 9: Proportions of Secondary Market Impacts for Refrigerators Would-be Acquirer Finds an Alternative Unit Proportion Alternative Type Proportion Second Market Impact Value Old Unit 50% Consumption value of retired appliances Yes 50% N...
AI summary Table 9 outlines the proportions of secondary market impacts for refrigerators, considering scenarios where a would-be acquirer finds an alternative unit. It differentiates between old and new units, their respective proportions, and associated consumption values. The table also includes a net unitary savings calculation.
Table 10: Net Savings per Refrigerator Would Have Kept % Discard Scenario % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % % Alternative % % Overall Ener Consun (kWh/ nption Savings the Unit Scenario , Alternative Unit туре туре Proportion Without ARet With...
AI summary Table 10 presents net savings per refrigerator based on different scenarios, including the percentage of units that would have been kept, discarded, or transferred, and the corresponding energy consumption and savings. The data indicates the impact of appliance retirement on energy savings.
Gross Unitary Savings The Evaluator revised the gross unitary savings value tracked by ENS by updating the same key parameters as for refrigerators.
AI summary The Evaluator updated the gross unitary savings value tracked by ENS using the same key parameters applied to refrigerators.
Table 11: Average Metered Annual Consumption for Retired Refrigerators Manufacture-year Class Average Per-cubic-foot Annual Consumption (kWh/cu. ft) Proportion of Refrigerators in the 2018 Tracking Sheet 1995 and later 56.2 45% 1994 and ea...
AI summary Table 11 presents the average annual energy consumption of retired refrigerators in Nova Scotia, categorized by their manufacture year. The average annual consumption is calculated based on the size of the refrigerators and their proportion in the 2018 tracking sheet.
Table 12: Average Annual Energy Consumption by Replacement Freezer Category Replacement Freezer Category High Efficiency (kWh/year) Standard Efficiency (kWh/year) New 289 321 Used 321 818 Project No. 6194 41
AI summary Table 12 presents average annual energy consumption for new and used freezers categorized by efficiency levels, highlighting the energy savings associated with high-efficiency models.
Table 13: Average Annual Consumption for Freezer Replacement Type of Replacement Annual Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Proportion New High-efficiency Freezer 289 88% Used High-efficiency Freezer 321 9% New Standard-efficiency Freezer 321 0%...
AI summary Table 13 presents the average annual energy consumption for different types of freezer replacements, highlighting the energy efficiency differences between new and used high-efficiency and standard-efficiency freezers. The table shows that new high-efficiency freezers have the lowest energy consumption at 289 kWh/year, while used standard-efficiency freezers have the highest at 818 kWh/year.
Table 16: Discarding Scenarios and Proportions for Freezers Would Have Kept the Unit Proportion Discard Scenario Proportion Total Proportion Yes 31% 31% No 600/ Transferred 35% 24% No 69% Disposed 65% 45% Secondary Market Impacts
AI summary Table 16 outlines scenarios for freezer discarding, showing that 31% of units would have been kept, while 69% were discarded, with 35% transferred and 65% disposed. The secondary market impacts are discussed in the context of appliance retirement and efficiency programs.
Net Unitary Savings Calculation Table 18 below presents the unitary savings value calculated for freezers retired through ARet. This unitary savings value was obtained by calculating a weighted average of all the scenarios and their corres...
AI summary Table 18 presents the net unitary savings value of 450 kWh per unit for freezers retired through ARet, calculated as a weighted average of various scenarios and their corresponding savings.
Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Room Air Conditioners The Evaluator assumed that the replacement units meet the current minimum level of energy efficiency required to meet ENERGY STAR performance levels, which is an EER of 11.2 B...
AI summary The Evaluator assumed replacement room air conditioners meet current energy efficiency standards, using an EER of 11.2 Btu/W·hr and a corresponding SEER of 12.4 Btu/W·hr. Using the same capacity and hours of operation as retired units, the annual energy consumption was calculated as 156 kWh.
Part-use Factor No part-use factor was applied to the annual energy consumption calculations because all room air conditioners are assumed to operate 328 hours per year during the cooling season.
AI summary No part-use factor was applied to annual energy consumption calculations for room air conditioners, as they are assumed to operate 328 hours per year during the cooling season.
Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Small Appliances Using an approach consistent with that used for retired full-sized appliances, the Evaluator calculated the average consumption values for each replacement category by dividing the...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated average energy consumption for replacement small appliances by using a method similar to that used for full-sized appliances, dividing annual energy consumption by cubic-foot volume and then multiplying by the average cubic-foot volume of small appliances. Table 24 presents the calculation results.
Average Consumption of Full Small Appliances Type of Replacement size Appliance Replacement Units (kWh/cu. ft) Average Size (cu. ft) Average Consumption (kWh/year) New High Efficiency 359 kWh / 17 cu. ft = 21.1 169 Used High Efficiency 400...
AI summary The text discusses the average consumption of small appliances, specifically refrigerators and freezers, comparing new and used high-efficiency models. Survey results from 2018 were used to determine the types of appliances replacing retired units, with all participants selecting either new or used high-efficiency models.
Based on these results, the average annual energy consumption values of replacement small refrigerators and freezers were established at 173 kWh and 182 kWh respectively, as summarized in [Table](#page-25-1) 25.
AI summary The average annual energy consumption for replacement small refrigerators and freezers was determined to be 173 kWh and 182 kWh respectively, as outlined in Table 25.
Table 30: Net Savings per Small Refrigerator Would Have Discard % % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative % Overall Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Savings Kept the Unit Scenario Type Alternative Unit Proportion Without ARet With ARet Net...
AI summary The tables present net savings in energy consumption (kWh/year) for small refrigerators and freezers based on scenarios involving unit replacement or disposal. The data shows varying levels of energy consumption and savings depending on whether the unit is kept, transferred, or disposed of, with different proportions of old and new units considered.
Refrigerator Replacement Since refrigerators eligible for replacement though HomeWarming correspond to the oldest age category used in the 2017 metering activities, the revised unitary savings value is based on the average annual per-cubic...
AI summary The HomeWarming program replaced old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR certified models, resulting in an average annual unitary savings of 773 kWh per year. The calculation is based on the energy consumption of old and new refrigerators, including size, occupancy adjustment factors, and efficiency improvements.
Freezer Replacement To establish the unitary savings of freezers replaced through HomeWarming, the Evaluator used the same approach as for refrigerators replaced through HomeWarming. The Evaluator used the average annual consumption value...
AI summary The document calculates the unitary energy savings from replacing old freezers with new efficient models through the HomeWarming program. It uses average consumption values for both old and new freezers to determine the energy savings per unit, resulting in a calculated savings of 1,385 kWh per year.
Dehumidifier Replacement The revised unitary savings value for dehumidifier is calculated using the following algorithm: $$\begin{array}{l} \textit{Unitary Savings} \ \left[\frac{kWh}{year}\right] = \left(\textit{Average Water Removal Capa...
AI summary The document provides a formula for calculating the unitary savings of replacing old dehumidifiers with ENERGY STAR certified models. It references the 2011 Ontario Power Authority report for assumptions about old units and uses an energy factor of 2.00 L/kWh for new models. The unitary savings are calculated as 660 kWh per year.
Sections 2018 Recommendations Executive Summary 1 Continue to perform the metering activity and ensure the metering protocol is followed. In the 2017 evaluation, the Evaluator recommended continuing the metering activity to increase the sa...
AI summary The 2018 recommendations emphasize continuing metering activities and improving data accuracy by following the metering protocol, particularly in controlled environments. It also suggests developing a protocol for heat gun usage to ensure proper identification and exclusion of non-working appliances from the metering sample and program results.
OPTION A [ASK IF ALL A-TYPE TOTAL SALES = YES] A. According to the data you provided to Efficiency Nova Scotia, you sold approximately [ ALL A-TYPE TOTAL SALES] A-type LED bulbs for the first half of the year. a. Is this representative of...
AI summary The text asks whether the sales of A-type LED bulbs in the first half of 2018 represent about 50% of the anticipated annual sales for the year, and whether the data includes all models or only those on the Instant Savings rebate eligible products list.
OPTION C [ASK IF DIFFICULTY TO ANSWER OPTION B AND IF REBATE ELIGIBLE A-TYPE TOTAL SALES =YES] C. According to the data you provided to Efficiency Nova Scotia, you sold approximately [REBATE ELIGIBLE A-TYPE TOTAL SALES] rebate eligible A-t...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the sales of rebate-eligible A-type LED bulbs, including the percentage of total sales, anticipated sales patterns for 2018 and 2019, and the selection of SKUs for rebate eligibility during the 2018 Instant Savings campaigns.
OPTION A [ASK IF ALL NON A-TYPE TOTAL SALES = YES] A. According to the data you provided to Efficiency Nova Scotia, you sold approximately [ALL NON A-TYPE TOTAL SALES] Non A-type LED bulbs for the first half of the year. i. Is this represe...
AI summary The document asks whether the sales of Non A-type LED bulbs in the first half of 2018 are representative of the full year's sales and whether the reported figures include all models sold, including those not on the Instant Savings rebate eligible product list.
C. According to the data you provided to Efficiency Nova Scotia, you sold approximately [REBATE ELIGIBLE NON A-TYPE TOTAL SALES] rebate eligible Non A-type LED bulbs for the first half of the year. i. What percentage of all your sales of N...
AI summary The text asks about the percentage of Non A-type LED bulb sales that are rebate eligible, whether these sales represent 50% of annual sales, and how rebate eligible models were selected for the 2018 Instant Savings campaigns. It also inquires about anticipated sales trends for 2019.
[ASK TO ALL] I1a. For the next questions, please take in consideration both A-type and non-A-type LED bulbs. What proportion of all LED bulbs you sold so far in 2018 were not ENERGY STAR certified? % I1b. [ASK IF I1a >0%] Why do you carry...
AI summary The text includes questions about the proportion of non-ENERGY STAR certified LED bulbs sold in 2018, reasons for carrying such bulbs, and the impact of the Instant Savings program on staff and consumer knowledge, as well as product offerings.
F1. What proportion of the lighting fixture models you carry in-store are: a. ENERGY STAR, hard-wired, with integrated LED lighting% b. Other types of lighting fixtures% IF F1a and F1b = 0% SKIP TO SATISFACTION F2. [ASK IF F1b > 0%] Among...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions related to the proportion of lighting fixtures carried in-store, rebate eligibility, and the impact of Instant Savings on customer choices and product offerings. It seeks insights into the factors influencing product selection, customer behavior, and program effectiveness.
a. Score b. Reason Aspects of the program 1 = not at all satisfied 10 = completely satisfied NA = Not applicable If rating of 7 or lower, please share the reason(s) for your score. S1. The overall program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia...
AI summary The text presents a table with various aspects of a program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia, including program preparation, marketing, product coverage, rebate amounts, and relationship with Summerhill. It also includes a request for feedback on satisfaction levels and reasons for low scores.
[ASK TO ALL] The last questions will allow us to help ENS improve the Instant Savings program. - BR1. In your opinion, what prevents consumers from buying energy efficient products in general? What is the single most important barrier? How...
AI summary This section asks stakeholders about barriers preventing consumers from purchasing energy-efficient products and seeks suggestions to increase participation in the Instant Savings program. It highlights concerns about program effectiveness and consumer engagement.
- 99. (Refused) To replace an To replace a To replace an To replace an efficient L-E-D bulb CFL bulb incandescent bulb incandescent bulb Typically have wattages of 40 W, 60 W or 100 W Typically have wattages of 29 W, 43 W or 72 W P3b. [IF...
AI summary This text includes a table comparing different types of light bulbs and wattages, and a question regarding the installation of an L-E-D bulb. The context suggests a regulatory or program-related proceeding, possibly concerning energy efficiency or appliance standards.
P5. READ] [IF P4b=2 or P3b=2]. Why do you plan on replacing L-E-D bulbs that are still working? [DO NOT 1. 2. 97 98. 99. Bulbs burn too fast Dislike lighting of these bulbs (Other [SPECIFY]) (Don't Know) (Refused) Awareness of Program and...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to customer awareness and engagement with the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, including reasons for replacing functional LED bulbs and methods of program discovery. The questions focus on consumer behavior and outreach effectiveness.
ASK OF EVERYONE FR0a. You bought L-E-Ds today. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a discount on packages of L-E-Ds. Before paying at the cash register, were you aware that a discount was offered on the purchase of L-E-Ds? [CODE ONE ONLY] - 1....
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document includes a series of questions aimed at understanding consumer awareness and behavior related to discounts on LED purchases, specifically focusing on whether respondents were aware of the discount before purchasing and how they learned about it.
Awareness of Program and Efficiency Nova Scotia (AW Series) - AW1. Have you ever heard of the Efficiency Nova Scotia program that offers instant savings at the cash register for the purchase of energy efficient lighting, controls or applia...
AI summary The document outlines a survey related to awareness of the Efficiency Nova Scotia program, which offers instant savings on energy-efficient products. It asks respondents if they are familiar with the program, how they learned about it, and what other products are included in the Instant Savings initiative.
Influence of the program (IN Series) - IN1. When shopping for your fixture, did you look at fixtures with L-E-D lighting only or did you look at fixtures with any type of lighting? - 1. Fixtures with L-E-D lighting only - 2. Fixtures with...
AI summary The document contains a series of questions aimed at understanding consumer behavior and perceptions regarding the purchase of LED fixtures, including factors like price, aesthetics, energy consumption, and the influence of discounts and promotions by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
P3c/P4c. Concerning the L-E-D bulbs that you will use to replace existing non-L-E-D bulbs: do you plan on installing these bulbs mostly …? Non-LED Bulb Replacement Timing 2018 Sample Size 102 To replace non-L-E-D bulbs once they burn out 3...
AI summary The text discusses the replacement timing of non-LED bulbs, with 67% of respondents planning to replace working bulbs, and reasons for replacing working LED bulbs, such as dislike of lighting or appearance. It also asks about awareness of the Efficiency Nova Scotia program offering instant savings for energy-efficient purchases.
Multiple responses \ \ Mentioned by those who purchased LED fixtures FR0a. You bought L-E-Ds today. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a discount on packages of L-E-Ds. Before paying at the cash register, were you aware that a discount was off...
AI summary The text discusses a customer's experience with purchasing LED fixtures and being offered a discount by Efficiency Nova Scotia. The question focuses on whether the customer was aware of the discount before making the purchase.
FR0f. Did you see the stickers, shelf signs or posters in the light bulb section of the store promoting the discount offered on L-E-Ds? In-store Promotion Awareness 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sample Size 201 221 94 152 Yes 90% 88% 94% 96% No 10%...
AI summary The question asks whether in-store promotions for LED light bulbs were visible in the light bulb section of the store. The table shows a high percentage of respondents (90% to 96%) were aware of the discount on LEDs in various years from 2015 to 2018.
FR1. You mentioned that you were aware, before paying at the cash register, that a discount is offered on the purchase of L-E-Ds. Did knowing this play a part in your decision to buy L-E-Ds today? Discount Influenced Purchase 2015 2016 201...
AI summary The text discusses survey data on how discounts on LED purchases influenced customer decisions from 2015 to 2018. The majority of respondents indicated that the discount played a significant role in their purchase decisions, with most stating they would not have bought LED bulbs without the discount.
FR3. How likely would you have been to buy the L-E-Ds that you purchased today if you had to pay the full price? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10, with a 0 indicating that you "Definitely Would Not Have Bought these L-E-Ds" and a 10 ind...
AI summary The question asks respondents to rate how likely they would have been to purchase the LEDs they bought if they had to pay the full price, using a scale from 0 to 10.
FR4. If the discount had NOT been offered, when would you have purchased the L-E-Ds that you purchased today? Would it have been...? Length of Time Before Purchasing LEDs 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sample Size 201 221 94 152 Earlier - - - 1% Defi...
AI summary The text presents survey data on how customers would have purchased LED bulbs without a discount. It shows that a significant percentage of respondents would have delayed or reduced their purchase, indicating the discount's influence on consumer behavior.
IN5. Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a discount on L-E-D fixtures today. Before paying at the cash register, were you aware that a discount was offered on the purchase of L-E-D fixtures? Aware of Discount 2018 Sample Size 31 Yes 90% No 10%...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia offered a discount on LED fixtures, and 90% of respondents were aware of the discount before purchasing. The in-store offer and promotion had the highest influence on purchase decisions, with the rebate and energy efficiency information also playing significant roles.
LED Lamps For this product, distinct unitary savings values were calculated for light-emitting diode (LED) A-type lamps, LED R, BR and decorative lamps and other LED non-A-type lamps sold through Instant Savings, based on the fact that R,...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for different types of LED lamps, including A-type, R, BR, and decorative lamps, based on their replacement of incandescent, halogen, and compact fluorescent lamps. The annual unitary savings formula is provided, and the Evaluator revised displaced wattage values in the 2018 evaluation.
Displaced Wattage The average displaced wattage values for the three lamp categories are established for two types of baselines: early replacement and replace on burn-out baselines. This methodology is recommended in the principles of the...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology for establishing average displaced wattage values for LED lamps based on two baseline types: early replacement and replace on burn-out. Questions from the 2018 intercept survey are used to determine participant behavior, which is essential for setting accurate baselines.
Table 32: Results of the Intercept Survey for Establishing the LED Lamp Baselines Question Number of Respondents Number of Lamps Percentage of Lamps Do you plan on installing these LED bulbs…23 To replace bulbs once they burn out? 72 491 4...
AI summary The intercept survey results show that 59% of respondents plan to replace working bulbs with LED lamps, while 41% will replace bulbs only after they burn out. Among those replacing working bulbs, 33% plan to use standard incandescent lamps, and 25% plan to use LED lamps. These findings led to the establishment of two types of baselines.
Early Replacement Baseline: The survey revealed that 59 percent of LED lamps purchased by participants replaced working lamps. Since those lamps were assumed to have an average remaining useful life of at least one year, the applicable bas...
AI summary The survey found that 59% of LED lamps purchased by participants replaced working lamps, with calculations based on lamp type replacement proportions and wattage equivalencies. Displaced wattage was considered 0 W when LEDs replaced other LEDs, and some responses were excluded due to 'Don't know' or other reasons.
er reason, and were excluded from the calculation of the percentage of lamps for each option. 25 Sum of answers may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. The Evaluator assumed that the LED lamps replacing LED lamps were A-type lamps s...
AI summary The Evaluator assumed A-type LED lamps for replacements due to their prevalence and the recent market introduction of non-A-type lamps. It was also assumed that all R, BR, and decorative lamps were replaced with incandescent lamps, and halogen lamps were replaced with LED lamps, affecting the calculation of lamp replacement percentages.
Table 34: Replace On Burn-out Baseline by LED Lamp Type LED Lamp Type Baseline Technology A Efficient incandescent as per Federal Regulations on General Service Lamps GU Standard halogen PAR Standard halogen R and BR Standard incandescent...
AI summary Table 34 outlines the baseline wattages for replacing traditional lamps with LED lamps based on the most popular models. It specifies the baseline technologies for different LED lamp types and provides weighted average wattages for each category.
Table 35: Calculations for Displaced Wattages Proportion Baseline Wattage (W) LED Lamp Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) LED A-type Lamps Early Replacement Scenario 59% 30.2 9.2 21.0 Replace On Burn-out Scenario 41% 43.3 9.2 34.1 Total LED...
AI summary Table 35 provides calculations for displaced wattages across different types of LED lamps under various replacement scenarios. The displaced wattages are 26.3 W for LED A-type lamps, 41.8 W for LED R, BR, and decorative lamps, and 44.7 W for other LED non-A-type lamps.
Hours of Operation The value for the daily hours of operation is based on the Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study (NERHOU) 27 study, which found that the average usage is 2.9 hours per day for efficient bulbs without the snap...
AI summary The document discusses the determination of daily hours of operation for efficient lighting based on studies, including the NERHOU study and a metering study conducted by the Evaluator. The NERHOU study's findings are preferred due to their larger scale and alignment with the Evaluator's results.
In-service Rate For upstream programs like Instant Savings, the UMP makes the following recommendation: "In-service rates should be calculated through an in-home audit. Since program bulbs cannot be easily identified, the in-service rate c...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of in-service rates for LED lamps under the Instant Savings program. It highlights that in-service rates should be calculated using in-home audits and considers factors like deeply discounted prices and consumer behavior. The Evaluator concludes that applying an in-service rate may not be necessary due to high participation rates and the likelihood of eventual installation.
Unitary Savings The unitary savings values were revised according to the displaced wattage of 26.3 W for LED A-type lamps, 41.8 W for R, BR and decorative lamps, and 44.7 W for other LED Non-A-type lamps. The estimated hours of operation r...
AI summary The unitary savings values for various LED lamps were revised based on displaced wattage and estimated hours of operation, resulting in specific kWh savings for different lamp types.
Displaced Wattage To establish the displaced wattage of each category of lighting fixture offered under Instant Savings, the Evaluator identified the 10 best-selling models in the 2018 tracking sheet. Wattage value data of these models, as...
AI summary The displaced wattage for LED recessed downlight fixtures under the Instant Savings program was calculated by analyzing the 10 best-selling models from 2018. The average wattage of the LED fixtures was 10.3 W, while the equivalent incandescent and halogen lamps averaged 61.5 W, resulting in a displaced wattage of 51.2 W.
Hours of Operation Similar to LED lamps, the Evaluator concluded that the hours of operation value of LED lamps from the 2014 NERHOU Study (2.9 h/day) is still valid for LED recessed downlight fixtures and all other types of LED fixtures s...
AI summary The Evaluator concluded that the hours of operation value of LED lamps from the 2014 NERHOU Study (2.9 h/day) remains valid for various LED fixtures sold through Instant Savings, except for those with motion sensors.
ENERGY STAR Certified LED Fixtures Without a Motion Sensor The unitary savings value associated with ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures without a motion sensor is obtained from the general lighting equation (Equation 1).
AI summary The unitary savings value of ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures without a motion sensor is derived from the general lighting equation (Equation 1).
Displaced Wattage The Evaluator selected the 10 most popular models, which represent 70 percent of all 2018 ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures without motion sensor sales. Some of those fixtures were used to replace fluorescent lamps. In t...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed the displaced wattage of LED fixtures by selecting the 10 most popular models representing 70% of ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures without motion sensors sold in 2018. Ballast factors and lumens data were used to calculate equivalent wattage for fluorescent and general-use lamps.
ENERGY STAR Certified LED Fixtures Equipped With a Motion Sensor The unitary savings value associated with ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures equipped with a motion sensor was determined by using the general lighting equation (Equation 1).
AI summary The unitary savings value for ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures with motion sensors was calculated using the general lighting equation (Equation 1).
Displaced Wattage The Evaluator analyzed all eight models of ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures equipped with a motion sensor sold through Instant Savings. The Evaluator found that 79 percent of these fixtures housed lamps that replaced ha...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed ENERGY STAR certified LED fixtures with motion sensors sold through Instant Savings, finding that 79% replaced halogen lamps and 21% replaced incandescent lamps. The average wattage for new LED fixtures was 29.7 W, and the average equivalent wattage was 151.5 W, resulting in a displaced wattage of 121.8 W.
Hours of Operation The Evaluator did not identify any new metering study that reported the hours of use associated with motion sensors in residential settings for outdoor or indoor usage. Hence, the Evaluator again applied the hours of use...
AI summary The Evaluator used weighted averages based on the percentage of indoor and outdoor LED fixtures with motion sensors to determine the hours of operation for 2018. Outdoor fixtures had higher usage hours than indoor ones, leading to calculated values of 4.43 and 2.68 hours per day for old and new operations.
Dimmer Switches The unitary savings value for dimmer switches is based on the general lighting equation. The daily HOU are based on the NEHROU metered value of 2.7 hours per day for all types of bulbs. The baseline fixture wattage value is...
AI summary The unitary savings value for dimmer switches is calculated using the general lighting equation, with daily HOU based on a NEHROU metered value of 2.7 hours per day. The baseline fixture wattage is set at two 43 W lamps, following Canadian regulations effective January 1, 2015. The dimmed wattage is reduced by 20% according to OPA 2011 measures, leading to a unitary savings value of 17.0 kWh.
Indoor Motion Sensors As for dimmer switches, the controlled wattage is considered equal to two 43 W bulbs. For all types of bulbs, the old operating time is 2.7 hours per day in conformity with the NERHOU Study. 32 Using a 54 percent redu...
AI summary The document calculates the energy savings from indoor motion sensors by adjusting the operating time of bulbs based on a 54% reduction, using data from the NERHOU Study and the OPA Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions list. The unitary savings value is established at 45.8 kWh.
Indoor Motion Sensor with Dimmer Switches The calculation of the unitary savings value for indoor motion sensors with dimmer switches is based on the combined savings associated with the installation of both a dimmer switch and motion sens...
AI summary The unitary savings value for indoor motion sensors with dimmer switches is calculated based on combined energy savings. The dimmer reduces lamp wattage by 20%, and the motion sensor reduces daily HOU by 54%. With a baseline fixture wattage of two 43 W bulbs and a daily HOU of 2.7 hours, the unitary savings value is 53.6 kWh.
Outdoor Motion Sensors The unitary savings value of 159 kWh for outdoor motion sensors is based on the OPA 2011 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions, 34 which assumes that the old operating time is 4.75 hours per day and the new operating...
AI summary The unitary savings value of 159 kWh for outdoor motion sensors is calculated based on the OPA 2011 Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions, which consider differences in operating times and wattage assumptions for security spotlights and porch lighting.
Power Bars With Integrated Timers [Table](#page-85-0) 37 below presents the parameters used to calculate the annual savings resulting from the installation of power bars with integrated timers. The methodology and parameters used were draw...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of annual energy savings from power bars with integrated timers, using parameters from the 2011 OPA Prescriptive Measures and Assumptions, with a minor adjustment to the number of days used per year.
Parameter Entertainment Centre Computer System Lighting Other Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Average Standby Wattage 38.1 W 28 W 60 W 28 W Old Operating Time 9 h/day 14 h/day 6 h/day 11 h/day New Operating Time – with Timer 5 h/day 8 h...
AI summary The table presents energy consumption data for different devices, including the proportion of usage, average standby wattage, operating time, and calculated unitary savings. The data highlights the potential energy savings from using load sensing power bars (smart strips).
Heavy-Duty Outdoor Timers For heavy-duty outdoor timers, the unitary savings value of 122 kWh is based on the results of the OPA 2012 Consumer Program Evaluation. 39 The survey conducted for this evaluation states that heavyduty outdoor ti...
AI summary The unitary savings value of 122 kWh for heavy-duty outdoor timers is based on the OPA 2012 Consumer Program Evaluation. These timers are used for outdoor lighting, pool pumps, and car block heaters, similar to those sold through the Instant Savings program.
Programmable Thermostats The results from the Hydro-Québec 2009 program evaluation of electronic thermostats in residential new construction 40 were used to establish the annual unitary savings value for programmable thermostats. This stud...
AI summary The annual unitary savings value for programmable thermostats in Nova Scotia was established at 221 kWh per year, based on a 2009 Hydro-Québec study and weighted by dwelling types in Nova Scotia's residential market as defined in the 2011 ENSC Socket Study.
Table 38: Unitary Savings Calculations for Programmable Thermostats Housing Type Calculation Parameters Single detached Duplex/Triplex/ Townhouse Apartment Proportion of Each Dwelling Type41 70.4% 10.6% 19.0% Gross Energy Savings per Therm...
AI summary Table 38 presents unitary savings calculations for programmable thermostats across different housing types, including single detached, duplex/triplex/townhouse, and apartment units. It outlines energy savings from thermostat accuracy and temperature setback, with weighted average savings provided.
Table 39: Literature Review Findings Summary for Average Annual Loads of Laundry per Household Source Study Sample Size Annual Number of Loads OPA, 201142 N/A 416 Hydro-Québec, 201143 255,709 290 Natural Resources Canada, 201144 6,000 213...
AI summary Table 39 summarizes findings from a literature review on average annual laundry loads per household. The data comes from various sources, including the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) and Natural Resources Canada, with values ranging from 213 to 416 loads per year. The Evaluator used findings from the OPA 2011 Measures List and Assumptions to determine energy savings for laundry drying methods.
Efficient Refrigerators For efficient refrigerators, the unitary savings value is determined by comparing the standard and efficient refrigerator energy consumption values. As part of the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator selected the 10 most...
AI summary The unitary savings value for efficient refrigerators is calculated by comparing the energy consumption of standard and efficient models. Based on 2018 data, the weighted average energy consumption of efficient refrigerators was 394 kWh, while standard refrigerators averaged 439 kWh, resulting in an estimated savings of 45 kWh per year.
Efficient Clothes Washers For efficient clothes washers, the unitary savings value was determined by comparing the standard and efficient clothes washer annual energy consumption values. These energy consumption values were determined by u...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy efficiency of clothes washers by comparing standard and efficient models using the Integrated Modified Energy Factor (IMEF) and capacity. The analysis calculates annual energy consumption for both types of washers based on 290 loads per year and determines the unitary savings value. The evaluation uses data from ENERGY STAR and Natural Resources Canada to establish consumption values and highlights that hot and cold water usage was not considered in the initial calculations.
Table 40: Energy Consumption Breakdown for Standard and Efficient Clothes Washers Energy Consumption Breakdown for Clothes Washers Proportion of Overall Consumption 51 Standard Clothes Washer Electricity Consumption (kWh) Efficient Clothes...
AI summary Table 40 provides an energy consumption breakdown for standard and efficient clothes washers, highlighting significant savings in electricity use for efficient models. The water heating system accounts for 24.8% of overall consumption, with efficient washers using 110 kWh compared to 163 kWh for standard ones. The Evaluator estimated savings by considering the percentage of electrically heated water and internal heaters in washers.
Table 41: Water Heating Sources for Clothes Washers Source of Hot Water for Clothes Washers Clothes Washer Water Heating DHW Tank Type Proportion Clothes Washer Energy Source Internal Electrical Heater 35% - • 35.0% DI IIW Tords Electrical...
AI summary Table 41 outlines the sources of hot water for clothes washers, including internal electrical heaters and DHW tanks. It shows that 78.6% of total water heating energy consumption by clothes washers comes from electrical sources, combining internal electrical heaters and electrical DHW tanks.
Project No. 6194 114 _ & lt;sup>51 Ad Hoc Recherche, Rapport d'évaluation, Programme : Produits Mieux Consommer – Électroménagers Energy Star (Années 2008 et 2009 ), p. 18. For water heating consumption, an adjustment factor for cold water...
AI summary An adjustment factor of 0.67 was applied to water heating energy consumption to account for cold water washing, based on a Hydro-Québec survey. Tables 42 and 43 show calculations for total electricity consumption of standard and efficient clothes washers.
Table 42: Electricity Consumption for Standard Clothes Washers Energy Consumption Component Energy Consumption Electricity Consumption (kWh) Adjustment Factor Adjusted Electricity Consumption (kWh) Water Heating System 163 128 0.67 86 Inte...
AI summary The document presents two tables comparing electricity consumption for standard and efficient clothes washers. Standard washers consume 581 kWh on average, while efficient models consume 390 kWh, resulting in unitary savings of 191 kWh.
ENERGY STAR Certified Room Air Purifiers For ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers, the unitary savings value is determined by using the following equation: & lt;sup>52 Ad Hoc Recherche, Rapport d'évaluation , Programme : Produits Mieux...
AI summary The document discusses the unitary savings value calculation for ENERGY STAR certified room air purifiers, referencing a report by Ad Hoc Recherche on the Energy Star appliance program from 2008 and 2009. The text includes images from page 91 of the document.
Where: › CADR: Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) 53 › EFbase: Efficiency for baseline unit (CADR/W) › EFeff: Efficiency for efficient unit (CADR/W) › Hours: Annual operating hours (hours/year) › SBPbase: Standby power for baseline unit (W) ›...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of annual energy consumption for room air purifiers, including baseline and efficient units, based on efficiency metrics like CADR and standby power. It references the ENERGY STAR program and the Savings Calculator for ENERGY STAR Qualified Appliances to establish energy consumption values for both standard and efficient models.
ENERGY STAR Certified Dehumidifiers For ENERGY STAR certified dehumidifiers, the unitary savings value is determined by using the following equation: An average water removal volume of 3.87 L/day and an average of 168 operating days per ye...
AI summary The document explains how the unitary savings value for ENERGY STAR certified dehumidifiers is calculated, using data from the 2011 OPA report and Canadian regulations. It outlines the energy factor requirements for dehumidifiers and establishes a unitary savings of 81.3 kWh per year for models sold through Instant Savings.
APPENDIX XI IS: DETAILED CALCULATIONS OF EQUIVALENT EFFECTIVE USEFUL LIFE FOR LED LAMPS AND FIXTURES This appendix presents the details on how the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) values of LED lamps and fixtures were calculated, wit...
AI summary This appendix details the calculation of equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for LED lamps and fixtures, considering changes in Canadian regulations. The methodology from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report is used, with the first year adjusted to 2018. The regulation change in 2024 is expected to increase baseline wattages for LED lamps and fixtures offered through Instant Savings.
LED A-type Lamps For LED A-type lamps, the lifetime energy savings values for early replacement and replace-on-burnout scenarios were established, as well as for the different types of lamps replaced. The Evaluator also considered that the...
AI summary The analysis discusses the lifetime energy savings of LED A-type lamps under early replacement and replace-on-burnout scenarios, considering the remaining useful life of incandescent bulbs and the impact of regulatory changes on baseline assumptions, including a shift to halogen incandescent and eventually CFL equivalents by 2024.
Table 45: Baseline Evolution During the EUL of LED A-type Lamps Replaced Early Type of Lamp Replaced Incandescent Baseline 1 Year (2018) Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation63,64 CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislati...
AI summary Table 45 outlines the baseline evolution during the EUL of LED A-type lamps replaced early, comparing different types of lamps (incandescent, halogen, CFL, and LED) in terms of wattage, energy savings, and percentage of lamps replaced. The table highlights the impact of changing energy efficiency regulations on baseline energy consumption over time.
Project No. 6194 119 62 Lighting Research Center. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Lighting Patterns for Homes. Light Bulb Features, [www.lrc.rpi.edu/patternbook/resources/lamp\_features.asp,](http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/patternbook/resources/...
AI summary The text provides references to sources related to lighting patterns and energy efficiency regulations, including a study by the Lighting Research Center and regulations from Natural Resources Canada. It also mentions U.S. federal legislation related to incandescent lamps.
Table 46: Baseline Evolution During the EUL of LED A-type Lamps Replaced on Burn-out Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislation 6 Years (2018-2023) 12 Years (2024-2035) Lifetime Ener...
AI summary The document discusses the baseline evolution of LED A-type lamps replaced on burn-out, showing energy savings over time and calculating an equivalent energy use life (EUL) of 8.4 years based on weighted average lifetime energy savings and first-year energy savings.
LED Non-A-type Lamps A similar analysis was conducted for LED non-A-type lamps, a product category that mostly includes reflector and decorative lamps (R, BR, GU, PAR, MR and decorative lamps). Reflector and decorative lamps are not impact...
AI summary An analysis of LED non-A-type lamps, including reflector and decorative lamps, was conducted. These lamps are not affected by current Canadian regulations but will be impacted by EISA 2020 requirements starting in 2024. Equivalent effective useful life (EUL) values were calculated for different categories of these lamps.
Average Replaced Average Wattage of Efficient Lamp Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislation66 10 Years (2024-2033) Lifetime Energy Savings Equivalent EUL Lamp (...
AI summary The table compares the average wattage of efficient lamps with baseline halogen incandescent lamps over different legislative periods, highlighting energy savings and equivalent useful life. It shows a significant reduction in wattage and energy consumption from 2018 to 2023 under Canadian legislation and from 2024 to 2033 under American legislation.
Table 48: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Non-A-type Lamps (Excluding R, BR and Decorative Lamps) Average Replaced Average Wattage of Efficient Lamp Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation 6 Years...
AI summary The table summarizes the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) calculation for LED non-A-type lamps, comparing halogen incandescent and CFL equivalents based on legislation and energy savings. The data highlights energy savings and EUL over different periods.
As for LED fixtures, the Evaluator analyzed their equivalent EUL in the same manner as for replacedon-burn-out lamps since the energy consumption of these fixtures is the consumption of the lamps provided with them. Therefore, the baseline...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed LED fixtures by comparing their equivalent EUL to replaced-on-burn-out lamps, capping the EUL at 25 years due to unlikely full-life savings. The rated life of LED recessed downlight fixtures was 38 years, but the EUL was capped at 25 years, with an equivalent EUL of 7.6 years.
Table 49: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Recessed Downlight Fixtures Average Replaced Lamp Average Wattage of Efficient Lamp Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equival...
AI summary The table presents an equivalent effective useful life (EUL) calculation for LED recessed downlight fixtures. It compares energy usage and savings between halogen incandescent and LED lamps, showing an EUL of 7.6 years for the LED fixtures in the table and 9.8 years for those without motion sensors.
Table 50: Equivalent Effective Useful Life Calculation Summary for LED Fixtures Without Motion Sensors Average Replaced Lamp Average Wattage of Efficient Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equivale...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of equivalent effective useful life (EUL) for LED fixtures without motion sensors, highlighting energy savings and baseline wattage comparisons. It also mentions the methodology used for LED fixtures with motion sensors, including reduced wattage and hours of use.
For the second step, the difference of hours of operation generated by the motion sensors was taken into account, as presented in Table 52. Table 51: Lifetime Energy Savings for LED Fixtures with Motion Sensors – Reduced Wattage Average Re...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime energy savings for LED fixtures with motion sensors, considering both reduced wattage and reduced hours of use. It references Table 51 and Table 52, which show energy savings over time, and calculates an equivalent energy use life (EUL) of 8.9 years.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report
AI summary This document is an appendix to the 2018 DSM Evaluation, focusing on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines the evaluation of the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency among residential consumers.
Section 2 - Free-ridership level for those who postponed their purchase because of the program FR0c. Before the beginning of the campaign on September 28 th , were you already aware that discounts on L-E-Ds would be offered this fall? IF Y...
AI summary This section of the proceeding explores the free-ridership level among individuals who postponed LED purchases due to a discount program. It includes questions to determine if respondents were aware of the discount and whether they delayed their purchase as a result.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report
AI summary This document is an appendix to the 2018 DSM Evaluation, focusing on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program in Nova Scotia. It provides an analysis of the program's effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency among residential customers.
APPENDIX XIII IS: SPILLOVER METHODOLOGY Retailer interviews were used to estimate the level of spillover by measuring the market effects attributable to the program component for LED lamps. Market effects were measured by estimating the nu...
AI summary This appendix outlines the methodology used to estimate spillover effects from the Instant Savings program on LED lamp sales. Retailer interviews and sales data were used to measure market effects, including sales of LED lamps without rebates and the proportion attributable to the program.
Option A - For retailers who have total LED sales available All LED Sales for the first half of the year (Jan. to June) (from uplift data) LED.lan-.lun L1A/N1A. Of all the LED bulbs you anticipate selling in 2018, roughly what percentage o...
AI summary This section outlines Option A for retailers with total LED sales available, focusing on calculating the percentage of LED bulbs sold during the first half of the year and estimating total annual sales based on that data.
Option B - For retailers who do not have total LED sales available How many LED bulbs did you sell during the first six months of 2018? LED Jan-Jun L1B/N1B. Of all the LED bulbs you anticipate selling in 2018, roughly what percentage of bu...
AI summary This section discusses Option B for retailers without total LED sales data available, asking about LED bulb sales during the first half of 2018 and estimating the percentage of annual sales expected during that period.
Option C - For retailers who had difficulty to answer Option B and only have rebate eligible LED sales All rebate eligible LED Sales for the first half of the year (Jan. to June) (from uplift data) LED Jan-Jun L1C/N1C. What percentage of a...
AI summary This section provides a calculation method for estimating total LED sales for the year based on rebate-eligible sales in the first half of the year. It includes formulas and variables for calculating total sales and percentages.
Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report
AI summary This document is an appendix report from the 2018 DSM Evaluation, focusing on the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program in Efficiency Nova Scotia. It provides an analysis of the program's performance and outcomes.
Program Influence I3. About what percentage of the total number of LED bulbs you sold, outside of those that received a rebate, can you directly or indirectly attribute to Efficiency Nova Scotia's programs and promotion – in essence, sales...
AI summary The text asks about the percentage of LED bulb sales outside of rebate programs that can be attributed to Efficiency Nova Scotia's initiatives, excluding rebate-eligible sales and considering specific timeframes. A formula is provided to calculate final market effects based on total LED sales and influence percentage.
Sections 2018 Recommendations Executive Summary 1 Perform a socket study through on-site visits to document energy savings potential related to lighting. Market data point to increasingly high penetration rates of LED lamps and fixtures in...
AI summary The 2018 recommendations focus on improving the evaluation of energy savings in residential lighting programs. Key actions include conducting socket studies to assess energy savings potential, continuing to monitor LED market indicators, and tracking smart devices due to their increasing popularity.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. EnerGuide rating An EnerGuide (official brand of Natural Resources Canada) rating is a standard measure of the home's energy performance. It is a measure of the...
AI summary The text defines key terms used in energy efficiency and building performance, including EnerGuide ratings, effective useful life, and equivalent CO2. These definitions help standardize measurements and evaluations of energy performance and savings over time.
Table 1: Overall Participation and Savings for Existing Residential Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings HEA Energy Savings 6.366 GWh 0.90 5.724 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 2 791 participants 127.258 GWh 0.90 114.488 GWh Peak...
AI summary Table 1 provides an overview of participation levels and energy savings from various residential programs in Nova Scotia, including Home Energy Assessments, Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation. It highlights gross and net savings in terms of energy consumption and peak demand reduction.
Home Energy Assessment HEA encourages homeowners to improve the energy efficiency and comfort of their homes by improving building envelopes, space heating systems, water heating systems, and mechanical ventilation systems. Eligible measur...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program encourages homeowners to improve energy efficiency and comfort through various home improvements. The program underwent several changes, including the removal of tiered rebates and the inclusion of non-electrically heated households after receiving funding from the Low Carbon Economy Fund in 2018. An evaluation in 2018 included documentation reviews, interviews, billing analysis, and project reviews.
HEA Performance HEA aimed to achieve 7.5 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.1 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that HEA achieved 5.724 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.600 M...
AI summary The Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program achieved 5.724 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.600 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, with 791 participants. Savings decreased compared to 2015 due to the removal of provincial funding for non-electrically heated households. However, net energy savings per participant increased due to changes in eligible measures and billing analysis. Non-electrically heated households were reintroduced in 2018 with federal funding, though impacts are yet to be observed.
Table 3: Comparison of HEA Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Savings Savings NTGR Net Savings 8.607 GWh 7.279 GWh 0.88 6.429 GWh 8.599 GWh 6.366 GWh 0.90 5.724 GWh Peak Demand Savings 2.436 MW 2.060 MW 0.88 1.819 MW 2.433 MW 1...
AI summary Table 3 compares HEA tracked and evaluated savings at the generator, showing discrepancies between tracked and evaluated savings, as well as net savings and NTGR. Green Heat savings deductions are also mentioned.
HEA Recommendations The 2018 evaluation revealed that HEA succeeded in achieving significant net and peak demand energy savings, although at lower levels than in previous years. Significant changes to HEA occurred in the second half of 201...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program showed significant energy savings, though lower than in previous years. Changes in 2018, such as reinstating funding for non-electrically heated households and revising incentives, were too recent to impact the evaluation. Recommendations include conducting a billing analysis to assess overestimation ratios and sharing evaluation findings with energy advisors to improve simulation accuracy.
Green Heat Performance Green Heat aimed to achieve 3.7 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 3.8 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that Green Heat achieved 4.227 GWh in net electrical energ...
AI summary Green Heat achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2018, with 4.227 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 4.042 MW in net peak demand savings. Participation increased due to factors like removal of pre-approval processes and marketing efforts. Most installations were MSHPs, and participants were satisfied with the program and equipment quality.
Green Heat Energy Savings To calculate Green Heat gross energy savings, the Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used for each type of equipment category based on the information in the tracking sheet, site visit results, literatu...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated Green Heat energy savings by reviewing unitary savings values, site visits, and billing analysis. Discrepancies were found in tracked data, particularly for MSHPs and ASHPs, leading to adjustments in savings estimates. Free-ridership levels increased significantly in 2018 due to a new delivery mechanism, with 54% of MSHP participants already deciding to install equipment before the program.
Table 5: Comparison of Green Heat Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 8.826 GWh 8.826 GWh 0.60 5.294 GWh Evaluation Results 8.826 G...
AI summary Table 5 compares Green Heat tracked and evaluated savings at the generator, showing energy and peak demand savings, with adjustments based on the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR). ENS tracked savings and evaluation results are presented for both energy and peak demand, with different NTGRs applied for various measures.
Green Heat Market Evolution For a second year, the Evaluator completed a market evolution assessment by analyzing key market indicators for MSHPs. The Evaluator gathered additional information in 2018 to draw conclusions on the state of th...
AI summary The Evaluator analyzed the market evolution of mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) in Nova Scotia, noting increased adoption driven by factors like improved reliability and incentives. The market is transitioning from growth to maturity, with Green Heat-qualified MSHPs dominating sales and new constructions increasingly relying on them.
Green Heat Recommendations The Evaluator noted that Green Heat participation increased significantly in 2018 (by 67%), likely due to changes to the application process and ENS promotional efforts. Changes in free-ridership levels and the M...
AI summary The Evaluator noted a 67% increase in Green Heat participation in 2018, likely due to process changes and promotional efforts. Issues with tracking sheet data accuracy and the need to monitor barriers to high-efficiency MSHP adoption were identified. Recommendations include improving data quality and adapting program strategies based on market trends.
Efficient Product Installation Available to all Nova Scotia residents, EPI provides homeowners and tenants with free-of-charge direct installation of energy efficient products such as light-emitting diode (LED) lamps and nightlights, lowfl...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, available to all Nova Scotia residents, provides free direct installation of energy-efficient products like LED lamps and low-flow showerheads. EPI was launched in 2017 through the merger of RP&C and RDI. The 2018 evaluation involved documentation review, interviews, surveys, and savings analysis.
EPI Performance EPI aimed to achieve 17.1 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.0 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that EPI achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463...
AI summary The EPI program achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018. These savings corresponded to 7,827 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided GHG emissions. EPI's net lifetime energy savings were 107.988 GWh, with a weighted average EUL of 8.45 years. Over 10,813 households participated, and ENS distributed free clotheslines and diversified product offerings to boost participation.
EPI Market Evaluation Highlights EPI achieved a very high level of satisfaction among participants, who rated the component an average of 9.3 on a 10-point scale. Similar to past evaluations, the main reason provided for this high level of...
AI summary EPI achieved high participant satisfaction, with installers being a key factor. Installed products received strong ratings, except for thermostatic shower valves. Lack of funds was identified as the main barrier to energy efficiency upgrades. Respondents showed high interest in door sweeps and lighting controls for porch lights.
EPI Energy Savings To calculate EPI gross energy savings, the Evaluator performed a literature review of the unitary savings values of each category of product tracked and installed through EPI. The Evaluator found that the values used to...
AI summary The Evaluator calculated EPI gross energy savings by reviewing unitary savings values for various products and updating them based on new data. Installation rates for certain products were adjusted, and the NTGR was determined to estimate net energy savings, with different values for low-income and non-low-income participants.
In 2018, EPI generated 12.777 GWh in net energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator. Net lifetime savings were estimated at 107.988 GWh. Table 7 below compares the tracked and the evaluated savings at the gener...
AI summary In 2018, the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program achieved significant energy and demand savings. The program generated 12.777 GWh in net energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator, with estimated net lifetime savings of 107.988 GWh. Table 7 provides a comparison of tracked and evaluated savings.
Table 7: Comparison of EPI Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 16.093 GWh 14.468 GWh 0.93 13.480 GWh Evaluation Results 15.914 GWh...
AI summary Table 7 compares EPI tracked and evaluated savings at the generator, showing that evaluated net energy savings are 5% lower than tracked net energy savings. The differences are attributed to small decreases in installation rates and NTGR values, as well as unitary savings adjustments.
EPI Recommendations Having operated in the market for several years, EPI still succeeds in achieving high levels of participation and savings. Moreover, participant satisfaction remains very high. The biggest challenges for EPI in the comi...
AI summary EPI has maintained high participation and satisfaction levels but faces challenges due to market saturation and declining opportunities for installing A-type LED lamps. ENS has diversified EPI's product offerings, including thermostatic shower valves, which require better information delivery to participants to improve satisfaction and reduce removal rates.
2017 2018 Program Program Component Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R C C Home Energy Assessment C C R Existing Residential Program Gree...
AI summary The table outlines various energy efficiency programs and their components, indicating their processes and impacts in different years. It highlights program components such as appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and efficient product installation, noting their roles in process and impact markets for 2017 and 2018.
1 HEA OVERVIEW This evaluation report first focuses on the HEA evaluation results, and then presents the results of the Green Heat and EPI program components. This section describes the HEA program component, follows up on the 2017 evaluat...
AI summary This section provides an overview of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program, discusses evaluation results, and follows up on 2017 recommendations. It also outlines participation history and touches on related program components like Green Heat and EPI.
1.2 Follow-up on the 2017 Evaluation Report Recommendations HEA was evaluated in 2017 and improvement recommendations were made by the Evaluator. Table 9 below provides a summary of the implementation status of each recommendation presente...
AI summary The 2017 Evaluation Report on HEA (Home Energy Assessment) identified areas for improvement, and Table 9 summarizes the implementation status of the recommendations made by the Evaluator.
Table 9: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for HEA 2017 Recommendation Status 2017 HEA-R1. Review the current incentive structure to look for possible ways to simplify it. Implemented 2017 HEA-R2. Conduct a billing analysis to...
AI summary The 2017 HEA recommendations were implemented. ENS simplified the incentive structure by discontinuing bundling and tiered approaches, launching the new structure in July 2018. A billing analysis using HOT2000 estimated the overestimation ratio for simulation models.
On-site Visits and Simulation Review As part of the evaluation, 10 HEA projects were reviewed. The project reviews consisted of: (1) an on-site visit at participating houses after the completion of the post-retrofit assessment (or E assess...
AI summary The evaluation process involved reviewing 10 HEA projects through on-site visits and simulation file verifications. These reviews aimed to validate data collected by EAs and ensure assumptions in HOT2000 simulations reflected actual energy performance. The reviews were conducted by EcoPlus and detailed in the Impact Evaluation section and Appendix I.
Savings Calculation Review For HEA, energy savings are calculated using the space heating consumption values obtained from the HOT2000 simulation models and by applying the ORs obtained from the billing analysis. For the few space heating...
AI summary The savings calculation review outlines the methodology for calculating energy savings from home energy assessments (HEA) using HOT2000 simulation models and billing analysis. Unitary savings values are used for some measures, and deductions are applied for participants in both HEA and Green Heat.
3 HEA IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2018 HEA impact evaluation is to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary The 2018 HEA impact evaluation aims to assess the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings resulting from the Home Energy Assessment program.
3.1 On-site Visits and Simulation Reviews As part of the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator conducted on-site visits and reviewed the simulation files of ten projects selected among those that generated electrical savings and completed both a...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation involved on-site visits and simulation reviews of ten projects to assess the completeness and accuracy of data collected through DCFs and simulation files. The review protocol was enhanced based on the updated EnerGuide Rating System (version 15), which requires more detailed on-site data collection.
Building Envelope Constituents The review of HOT2000 simulations confirmed that building envelope constituents were generally recorded and transcribed accurately by EAs; the discrepancies found had an impact of less than 2 percent on the e...
AI summary The review of HOT2000 simulations found that building envelope constituents were generally recorded accurately by EAs, with discrepancies having less than a 2% impact on energy consumption. Common mistakes included incorrect geometry assumptions, basement configurations, window orientation, and thermopane window assumptions, which could affect energy consumption by up to 5%.
HVAC Equipment The EnerGuide Rating System (version 15) includes enhanced specifications for HVAC equipment. The protocol describes in greater detail which data must be collected to provide a more standardized home assessment, especially w...
AI summary The EnerGuide Rating System version 15 includes enhanced specifications for HVAC equipment, improving standardized home assessments. Review of ten files identified 16 errors related to HVAC equipment, with some having a significant impact on energy consumption. Issues included failure to record non-functional equipment, incorrect SEER values, and incomplete modelling of heating systems. Errors in HRV flow rate calibration also occurred, though their impact was limited.
Water Heating Equipment The characteristics associated to domestic hot water (DHW) equipment were also reviewed. Only standard water heater tanks were recorded for the ten sites reviewed. In general, the information provided for this equip...
AI summary The review of domestic hot water (DHW) equipment found that standard water heater tanks were recorded at ten sites, with accurate and comprehensive information except for tank volume units, which vary between US gallons, imperial gallons, and liters. Energy advisors (EAs) are advised to record the correct unit when collecting this information.
3.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from the building envelope measures, space heating measures as well as DHW measures implemented by HEA participants, regardless of why they participat...
AI summary Gross savings refer to the change in energy consumption from building envelope, space heating, and DHW measures implemented by HEA participants. The Evaluator adjusted tracked savings calculations for solar DHWs and HPWHs to ensure consistency between tracked and revised savings.
3.2.1 Overview of the Measures No new energy efficiency measures were made available to participants in 2018. Table 11 below lists the upgrades currently eligible under HEA and identifies the measures for which savings are calculated using...
AI summary In 2018, no new energy efficiency measures were introduced. Table 11 outlines the eligible upgrades under the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program and their implementation rates, with savings calculated using HOT2000 energy consumption modelling.
Table 11: HEA Eligible Energy Efficiency Upgrades Eligible HEA Upgrade Measures HOT2000 Energy Consumption Modelling Used to Calculate Savings Implementation Rate (%) Yes No Building Envelope Measures Attic Insulation x Cathedral Ceiling I...
AI summary Table 11 outlines eligible Home Energy Assessment (HEA) upgrades and their implementation rates in Nova Scotia. It details various building envelope measures, space heating equipment, and domestic water heating equipment, with some measures having high implementation rates and others showing low or zero adoption.
Where: - › Electrical space heating energy consumption (ESHEC) is obtained from HOT2000 (for the D and E assessments) - › OR is used to adjust the modelled energy consumption (according to the space heating system in place during the D and...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating energy savings using the Electrical Space Heating Energy Consumption (ESHEC) metric derived from HOT2000 software. It discusses the use of an Overestimation Ratio (OR) to adjust modelled energy consumption and the transition from a single OR in 2017 to distinct ORs based on heating systems in the 2018 evaluation. The calculation also accounts for fuel switching and the distribution of savings between DSM and PNS funded programs.
The Overestimation Ratio As illustrated in the space heating savings equation, ORs are used to adjust the modelled space heating consumption values generated by HOT2000 because it tends to overestimate savings. The ORs are obtained by comp...
AI summary The Overestimation Ratio (OR) is used to adjust space heating consumption values generated by HOT2000, as it tends to overestimate savings. Billing analyses in 2015 and 2018 revealed that heat pump installations had a more significant impact on ORs than the version of HOT2000. Three distinct ORs were calculated based on whether participants had heat pumps installed or not, and the OR used for tracked savings calculation was 16% for all scenarios.
Scenario OR D Assessment OR E Assessment Scenario Tracked Revised Tracked Revised A participant who registered with a heat pump 0% 0% A participant who registered without a heat pump and who did not install one 16% 19% 16% 19% A participan...
AI summary Table 12 presents Overestimation Ratio (OR) values for Home Energy Assessments (HEA) under different scenarios, showing variations based on whether participants registered with or without heat pumps and whether they installed one.
3.2.3 Wood, Pellet and Solar Air Equipment Savings Wood, pellet, and solar air space heating equipment is not simulated in HOT2000. Since these types of equipment are also offered under Green Heat, the Evaluator relied on the results of th...
AI summary The document discusses the lack of simulation for wood, pellet, and solar air space heating equipment in HOT2000 and reliance on previous evaluations for savings values. Solar air equipment was not installed under HEA or Green Heat in 2018, so no savings value was established for it.
Table 13: Tracked and Revised Unitary Savings for Wood, Pellet and Solar Air Equipment Category of Equipment Tracked Savings Value (kWh) Revised Savings Value (kWh) Wood Stove – With Electrical Baseboard Baseline 10,443 No change Wood Stov...
AI summary Table 13 outlines tracked and revised unitary savings for wood, pellet, and solar air equipment. Savings values remain unchanged for most equipment, with specific notes on Green Heat and the application of the smallest value for wood and pellet furnaces or boilers due to lack of differentiation in tracking sheets and no installations in 2018.
Drain Water Heat Recovery ENS uses a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for DWHR. This value was determined in the 2017 evaluation using the online calculator from the Centre for Energy Advancement through Technology Innovation,11 w...
AI summary ENS uses a unitary savings value of 805 kWh per year for Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR) systems, calculated using data from the 2017 HEA participant survey and the Centre for Energy Advancement through Technology Innovation's online calculator. This value remains unchanged for 2018 despite no installations under HEA that year.
Solar Domestic Hot Water The design details of the solar DHW systems installed through HEA are not included in the tracking sheet. Therefore, the unitary savings value for this equipment is determined based on the average value of DHW syst...
AI summary The unitary savings value for solar domestic hot water (DHW) systems installed through Home Energy Assessments (HEA) was updated to 2,945 kWh per year, based on data from 40 systems installed between 2016 and 2018 through Green Heat. Previously, the value was determined using data from 2015 to 2017.
Heat Pump Water Heaters The annual unitary savings values used by ENS for the HPWHs installed through HEA is the same as the tracked unitary savings values established for the HPWHs installed through Green Heat. The values were revised as...
AI summary The annual unitary savings values for heat pump water heaters (HPWHs) installed through Home Energy Assessments (HEA) are the same as those used for HPWHs installed through the Green Heat program. These values were revised in 2018 and are based on the Green Heat savings calculation methodology. The savings differ depending on whether participants had a heat pump or electrical baseboards as their baseline.
Summary Table 14 lists the tracked and revised savings values for each type of DHW heating equipment.
AI summary Table 14 presents the tracked and revised savings values for each type of domestic hot water (DHW) heating equipment, indicating updates or changes in efficiency or performance metrics.
Table 14: Tracked and Revised Unitary Savings for Domestic Hot Water Heating Equipment Category of Equipment Tracked Savings Value (kWh) Revised Savings Value (kWh) Drain Water Heat Recovery 805 No change Solar Domestic Hot Water 2,803 2,9...
AI summary Table 14 presents tracked and revised unitary savings for domestic hot water heating equipment, including drain water heat recovery, solar domestic hot water, and heat pump water heaters. The table shows changes in savings values for these technologies, with some revised upwards.
3.2.6 Interactive Effects In a home, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other factors such as heating and cooling. The interactive effects of the space...
AI summary Interactive effects refer to how energy efficiency measures affect other factors like heating and cooling. In HOT2000, interactive effects of space heating measures are already included in savings calculations. For DHW measures, interactive effects are considered nil except for HPWHs, where they are already factored into the engineering equation used for savings calculations.
Table 15: HEA Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values Measure Tracked Equivalent EUL (Years) Revised Equivalent EUL (Years) Revised Lifetime Gross Energy Savings per Unit (kWh) Space Heating Equipment Building Envelope Space heating Equipm...
AI summary Table 15 presents HEA Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various energy efficiency measures, including space heating equipment, drain water heat recovery equipment, and solar domestic hot water systems. The EUL for building envelope measures and space heating equipment was established in 2018 and remains unchanged.
Table 16: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for HEA Sp He in t ac e a g D W H Rs So la D H W r H P W Hs To l ta f ic ip / i Nu be Pa Un t ts ts m r o r an 7 9 1 0 1 4 7 9 1 Ev lu d En Sa in te a a er g y v g s Un i Sa ing Va lue...
AI summary Table 16 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for Home Energy Assessments (HEA), including data on various energy efficiency measures such as air-source heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, and drain water heat recovery systems. The table outlines figures related to energy savings, unit values, and gross energy savings across different categories.
3.3.1 Free-ridership Free-ridership occurs when participants would have still implemented energy efficiency measures in the absence of the program component. Free-ridership was assessed in 2017 through a participant survey with HEA partici...
AI summary Free-ridership refers to participants who would have implemented energy efficiency measures without the program. In 2017, a survey of HEA participants assessed this, and the same level was used in 2018 due to recent changes in HEA not being observable in that year's evaluation.
Table 19: Unconverted D Assessment Spillover 2018 Results Total Number of Unconverted D Assessment Participants 679 Ratio of Unconverted D Assessment Participants Who Implemented At least One Measure 54% Total Number of Unconverted D Asses...
AI summary Table 19 provides data on the Unconverted D Assessment Spillover from 2018, including the number of participants, implementation rates, energy savings, and peak demand savings. Section 3.5 discusses Green Heat Savings Deductions, indicating a focus on energy efficiency and savings related to heating systems.
3.6 Net Savings Net savings represent the savings that can be reliably attributed to a program component. For HEA, net savings are calculated by deducting the Green Heat savings, applying the aforementioned NTGR value to the evaluated gros...
AI summary Net savings for the Home Energy Assistance (HEA) program are calculated by adjusting gross savings with specific factors, resulting in estimated energy and peak demand savings. The calculation also considers greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy usage over time, yielding a weighted average energy use life (EUL) of 20.0 years.
Table 20: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for HEA Savings Total Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 5.792 NTGR 0.76 Unconverted D Assessment Spillover Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 0.836 Net...
AI summary Table 20 evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings from the Home Energy Assistance (HEA) program, including gross savings, adjustments, deductions, and lifetime impacts. It highlights energy and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, with a focus on the effective useful life and line loss factors.
Table 21: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated HEA Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 8.607 GWh 7.279 GWh 0.88 6.429 GWh Evaluation Results 8.599 GW...
AI summary Table 21 compares tracked and evaluated Home Energy Assistance (HEA) savings at the generator level, showing discrepancies between Energy Nova Scotia (ENS) tracked savings and evaluation results, with adjustments and net savings calculated using the NTGR ratio.
4 HEA RECOMMENDATIONS The 2018 evaluation revealed that HEA succeeded in achieving significant net and peak demand energy savings, although at lower levels than in previous years. Significant changes to HEA occurred in the second half of 2...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of the Home Energy Assistance (HEA) program showed significant but lower-than-previous energy savings. Changes in 2018, such as reinstating funding for non-electrically heated households and revising incentive structures, were too recent to show impacts in the 2018 evaluation. The Evaluator recommends conducting a billing analysis to evaluate overestimation ratios and the impact of different HOT2000 versions on energy savings.
2018 HEA-R2. Share evaluation findings with the EAs to ensure sustained quality simulations. As part of the 10 HEA on-site visits and HOT2000 simulation reviews, the Evaluator noted that significant improvements have been achieved in both...
AI summary The Evaluator noted significant improvements in data collection accuracy and quantity since 2016, with EAs performing well in recording household energy data and complying with EnerGuide requirements. However, recurrent mistakes in HOT2000 simulations were identified, and feedback is recommended to improve the project review process.
2017 Recommendations Status 2017 GH-R1. Perform the ASHP billing analysis again in 2018. Implemented 2017 GH-R2. Conduct a survey with a larger sample of participants who installed MSHPs in non-electrically heated households. Implemented 2...
AI summary The 2017 Green Heat recommendations were largely implemented by ENS, with the exception of GH-R5, which is still in progress. The implemented recommendations focused on evaluation activities, including billing analysis and market evolution studies. The results of these evaluations are detailed in specific sections of the report.
5.3 Participation History In 2018, 3,055 measures were installed through Green Heat, which represented a significant increase of 67 percent over 2017 levels. As illustrated in Figure 7 below, MSHPs are the most commonly installed measure a...
AI summary In 2018, the Green Heat program saw a 67% increase in installations compared to 2017, driven by the removal of pre-approval requirements and increased marketing efforts. The program achieved significant energy savings, with 9.078 GWh in gross energy savings and 8.647 MW in peak demand savings.
6 GREEN HEAT EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the Green Heat evaluation are as follows: - > Reporting on participant perspectives - Calculating program results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy s...
AI summary The Green Heat evaluation aims to report on participant perspectives, calculate program results such as energy savings and GHG emissions, and analyze the market evolution of MSHPs. The methodology includes data collection, review of program documentation, and meetings with program managers to ensure alignment with evaluation goals and previous recommendations.
Participant Survey In October and November 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with 90 participants. The average length of the survey was 16 minutes. The questionnaire and complete survey results are presented in Appendices IV and V. Th...
AI summary In 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with 90 participants to gather feedback on the Green Heat Program, covering aspects such as program awareness, participation motivations, equipment usage, free-ridership, satisfaction, barriers to installation, and demographic information. The survey results are detailed in Appendices IV and V.
Interviews with Distributors In November 2018, Econoler conducted six interviews with distributors who sell and install HVAC products in Nova Scotia to gain deeper understanding of high-efficiency and standard MSHP sales and trends in the...
AI summary In November 2018, Econoler conducted six interviews with distributors in Nova Scotia to understand trends in the sales of high-efficiency and standard MSHP products. The interview guide is included in Appendix VII.
Literature Review The Evaluator performed a literature review to update the savings values presented in the tracking sheet for biomass, solar thermal, and heat pump measures, with the exception of ASHPs for which a billing analysis was use...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted a literature review to update savings values for biomass, solar thermal, and heat pump measures, except for ASHPs, which used a billing analysis to determine savings values.
Billing Analysis A billing analysis was conducted for participants who had an ASHP (centrally-ducted) installed in previous years to establish the average energy savings achieved. The billing analysis compared energy consumption as a funct...
AI summary A billing analysis was conducted to assess energy savings from ASHP installations under the Green Heat Program. It compared energy usage before and after installation, using heating degree days over a one-year period. The analysis included 2,608 participants with 3,055 measures installed.
8.1 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption that results from actions taken by participants regardless of their reasons for participating.18 For Green Heat, the Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings valu...
AI summary Gross savings refer to the change in energy consumption due to participant actions. For the Green Heat program, the Evaluator used 2017-established EUL values to calculate lifetime energy savings in 2018, considering unitary savings, peak demand-to-energy ratios, and interactive effects.
Biomass Measures The two site visits served to determine that the biomass measures were installed correctly, operating as intended and tracked correctly in the Green Heat tracking sheet. In each case, the new biomass equipment offset elect...
AI summary Site visits confirmed that biomass measures were installed correctly and functioned as intended, offsetting electrical consumption previously handled by MSHPs. Installations were performed by certified professionals under the Green Heat Program, with no reported issues from participants.
Solar Thermal Measures The two solar thermal visits served to verify that the equipment was installed correctly. Roof-mounted flat-plate collector systems were indeed installed at each home, with suitable collector orientation and no obstr...
AI summary The solar thermal visits confirmed proper installation of roof-mounted flat-plate collector systems at each home, with no obstructions and proper client education provided. The systems offset electricity consumption, with electrical DHW heaters serving as the baseline equipment.
Heat Pump Measures For these site visits, the Evaluator confirmed that the new heat pumps were used as a primary or major heat source in 19 of 21 homes. For the other two homes, an electrical boiler provided in-floor heat for the whole bui...
AI summary The evaluation of heat pump installations in 21 homes found that 19 used ASHPs as the primary heat source, while two used electrical boilers. The report notes that the presence of non-electrical secondary heating systems, such as wood or pellet stoves, may affect heat pump savings. Thermostats were often located near secondary systems, potentially causing heat pumps to turn off during their use.
8.1.2 Summary of Savings Values To review Green Heat unitary savings, the Evaluator conducted on-site visits for biomass, heat pump, and solar measures, performed a billing analysis for ASHPs and a literature review for all other measures,...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed Green Heat unitary savings through on-site visits, billing analysis, and literature reviews, with detailed results in Appendix VIII. Tables 26 and 27 show revised savings values for various measures, excluding solar DHW and solar air heating, which rely on simulations. Peak demand savings were calculated based on the coldest days between December and February.
8.1.3 Interactive Effects Interactive effects occur in a home when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of Green Heat, the energ...
AI summary Interactive effects refer to how energy efficiency measures can influence the energy consumption of other home systems like heating and cooling. In the Green Heat Program, high-efficiency heating measures do not change heating or cooling loads, except for HPWHs, which already account for interactive effects in their engineering equations.
Measure Tracked Equivalent EUL (Years) Revised Equivalent EUL (Years) Revised Lifetime Gross Energy Savings per Unit (kWh) Wood and Pellet Stoves 18.0 No change 187,974 Wood and Pellet Furnace/Boilers 18.0 No change - Solar DHW and Solar A...
AI summary The table outlines energy efficiency measures and their equivalent energy use lifetimes (EUL) and energy savings. Some measures, like wood and pellet stoves and heat pump water heaters, have specific energy savings values, while others have no changes or are not quantified.
8.1.5 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of equipment installed through Green Heat in 2018 are listed below in Table 29. Overall, the total gross electrical energy and peak demand savings amounted to 9.078 GWh...
AI summary The annual gross savings from equipment installed through the Green Heat Program in 2018 are detailed, with total electrical energy and peak demand savings of 9.078 GWh and 8.647 MW respectively. Lifetime savings are estimated at 163.749 GWh, with a weighted average EUL value of 18.04 years.
Table 29: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Green Heat Me Ca te as ur e g or y W d S to oo ve Pe l le S t to ve W d Fu / oo rn ac e Bo i le r Pe l le Fu / t rn ac e Bo i le r So la D H W r H P W H Sa ( ) G Pe k De d in he Ge...
AI summary Table 29 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for the Green Heat Program, showing values for different categories such as Wood Stove, Pellet Boiler, and Solar DHW. The data indicates energy savings across various heating technologies.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Green Heat (Continued) Ca Me te as ur e g or y M S H P – Fu l ly E le ic l tr c a M S H P – in M ly a E le ic l tr c a M S H P No n – le ica l tr e c A d A S H P an W H P – E le ic l tr c a...
AI summary The table presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for the Green Heat Program, including data on different heat pump technologies and their contributions to energy savings. The data includes various metrics such as energy savings, line load factors, and other related figures.
MSHP Measure For MSHPs, which constitute by far the most popular Green Heat measure, the Evaluator assessed free-ridership by using two factors: (1) a first series of questions regarding participants' decision to install a heat pump instea...
AI summary The Evaluator assessed free-ridership for MSHPs by analyzing participants' decisions to install a heat pump and their influence from ENS programs. Results show 71% had already decided to install MSHPs before Green Heat, and free-ridership was 54%, highlighting ENS's influence on equipment choices.
8.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions specifically attributable to Green Heat. Net savings were estimated by applying the NTGRs listed above to the evaluated gross savings using the following equation: Net Sa...
AI summary Net savings from the Green Heat Program are calculated using NTGRs applied to gross evaluation savings. The program resulted in 4.227 GWh of annual electrical energy savings and 4.042 MW of peak demand savings. These savings equate to 2,589 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually, with a weighted average EUL of 18.05 years for net energy savings.
Table 31: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Green Heat Ca Me te as ur e g or y S W d to oo ve S Pe l le t to ve W d oo Fu / Bo i le rn ac e r Pe l le t Fu / Bo i le rn ac e r So la D H W r H P W H Sa En in er g g s y v Re is...
AI summary Table 31 evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings for the Green Heat Program, including metrics such as energy savings, peak demand reductions, and lifecycle assessments for different heating technologies.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Green Heat (Continued) Measure Category MSHP – Fully Electrical MSHP – Mainly Electrical MSHP – Non- electrical ASHP and AWHP – Electrical ASHP and AWHP – Non- electrical GSHP Total Energy S...
AI summary The document presents a detailed evaluation of net energy and peak demand savings for the Green Heat Program, including various measures such as MSHP and ASHP, with data on energy savings, net energy savings, and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels over the effective useful life of the measures.
Table 32: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Green Heat Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 8.826 GWh 8.826 GWh 0.60 5.294 GWh Evaluation Results 8.826...
AI summary Table 32 compares tracked and evaluated green heat savings by Energy Nova Scotia (ENS) and evaluation results, showing gross and net savings for energy and peak demand. Adjusted gross savings and NTGR (Net-to-Gross Ratio) values are provided, with different NTGRs for various measures like MSHP and biomass.
9 GREEN HEAT MARKET EVOLUTION Econoler analyzed the evolution of the MSHP market in the 2017 evaluation. Since certain key data points were unavailable or were drawn from information from participating contractors, a conclusion on the curr...
AI summary Econoler evaluated the MSHP market in 2017 but could not determine its current state due to incomplete data. This section aims to update the analysis with new information to assess market evolution and adapt program offerings accordingly.
9.1.1 Efficiency Nova Scotia Until 2012, ENS provided rebates for ductless MSHPs through EnerGuide for Existing Houses (currently known as HEA). In April 2012, ENS incentives on heating and cooling equipment were transferred to a new progr...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has undergone several changes in its programs related to ductless MSHPs. Initially, rebates were provided through EnerGuide for Existing Houses (HEA) until 2012, after which incentives were transferred to the Fuel Substitution program. In 2015, the Green Heat program was expanded to include ductless MSHPs, significantly boosting participation. In 2017, eligibility criteria and incentive structures were updated, allowing non-electrically heated homes to qualify for incentives. Since 2018, DSM funds have been used exclusively for electrically heated homes.
Green Heat Mini-split Heat Pumps Green Heat incents participants to purchase eligible high-efficiency MSHPs. Only single-zone systems with a heating seasonal performance factor (HSPF) greater than 9.565 in Region V and multi-zone systems w...
AI summary The Green Heat Program incentivizes the purchase of high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) with specific HSPF thresholds. The program has seen increasing participation since 2015, with a notable rise in 2018 from participants with non-electrically heated homes. Systems below the HSPF threshold may still qualify if equipped with a drain pan heater.
HEA Mini-split Heat Pumps HEA also provides incentives for participants installing high-performing cold-climate MSHPs (i.e. same criteria as Green Heat) as part of a retrofit. As indicated in Table 34, HEA had 402 MSHP systems installed in...
AI summary HEA provides incentives for installing high-performing cold-climate mini-split heat pumps as part of a retrofit. In 2018, HEA had 402 such systems installed.
9.2.5 Mini-split Heat Pump Market Outlook and Trends MSHP sales increased from 2017 to 2018. All interviewed distributors, except one, reported an increase in MSHP sales over the period, with an average increase of 28 percent. The growth r...
AI summary Mini-split heat pump (MSHP) sales in Nova Scotia increased significantly from 2017 to 2018, driven by factors such as hot summers, product improvements, and consumer awareness. Distributors expect continued growth through 2019, though some note potential market saturation. The market is viewed as nearing maturity, with future growth expected from new construction and replacements.
Table 36: Analysis of Key Factors in Program Component Planning Factor Results Market share of heat pumps and efficient MSHPs In 2017, an estimated 24% of Nova Scotians operated a heat pump either as a primary or secondary heating source....
AI summary This table discusses the market share and trends of heat pumps and efficient MSHPs in Nova Scotia, noting increased sales in 2018 and the role of the Green Heat Program. It also covers pricing trends, availability, and the current status of heat pumps in building codes.
9.4 Green Heat Recommendations The Evaluator noted that Green Heat participation increased significantly in 2018 (by 67%), likely due to changes to the application process and ENS promotional efforts. Changes in free-ridership levels and t...
AI summary The Evaluator highlights that Green Heat participation increased in 2018 due to process changes and promotional efforts. However, data reliability issues were found in the tracking sheet, and the program's influence on MSHP adoption is diminishing. Recommendations include improving data accuracy and continuing to monitor market barriers for high-efficiency MSHPs.
10.1 Description EPI provides participants with free-of-charge direct installations of energy efficient products. ENS contracts service providers to provide this service across the province. EPI encourages participants to also consider oth...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program provides free direct installation of energy-efficient products to homeowners and renters across Nova Scotia. In 2018, the program expanded to include thermostatic shower valves and free clotheslines. EPI is funded by electricity ratepayer funds and the Government of Nova Scotia, with specific eligibility criteria for different products. The program aimed to achieve significant energy savings in 2018.
Table 37: Implementation Status of 2017 Recommendations for EPI 2017 Recommendation Status 2017 EPI-R1. Document the energy savings potential related to halogen incandescent and compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) replacements. Being implemente...
AI summary The implementation status of 2017 EPI-R1 shows that ENS is working to document energy savings potential from halogen incandescent and CFL lamp replacements. Service providers found no halogen lamps in homes, conflicting with other data. ENS has not pursued CFL replacements due to high cost and low savings.
10.3 Participation History Since 2012, EPI has contributed significantly to the growth of energy efficient lighting product penetration in the Nova Scotia market by providing direct installation of such products to over 100,000 households....
AI summary Since 2012, the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program has significantly increased energy-efficient lighting product penetration in Nova Scotia. However, participation levels declined in 2018, with a 21% drop in participants and a 27% drop in installed products compared to 2017. The decline is attributed to a smaller pool of potential participants and a shift in product types, with A-type lamps decreasing and non-A-type lamps increasing in usage.
11 EPI EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the EPI evaluation are as follows: - › Reporting on participant perspectives - › Calculating program results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, pea...
AI summary The EPI evaluation objectives include reporting on participant perspectives and calculating program results such as energy savings and GHG emissions. The methodology involved reviewing EPI documentation, meeting with the program manager, and using a sampling approach with a 10% margin of error at a 90% confidence level to ensure precision in measurements.
Participant Survey In October 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with a total of 100 non-low-income participants39 comprising 70 owners and 30 tenants. The average length of the survey was 18 minutes. The questionnaire and complete sur...
AI summary A telephone survey conducted by CRA in October 2018 with 100 non-low-income participants assessed feedback on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including installation satisfaction, barriers to energy efficiency upgrades, and recommendations for improvement. The survey aimed to evaluate free-ridership and spillover effects.
12 EPI MARKET EVALUATION A survey with 100 participating households was conducted as part of the EPI evaluation. In addition to questions designed for impact evaluation purposes, survey respondents were asked questions regarding reasons fo...
AI summary A survey of 100 EPI participants found that 77% joined to save on energy costs, and 35% had prior experience with ENS programs. The main barrier to energy upgrades was lack of funds, which EPI addresses by providing free installations.
13 EPI IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2018 EPI impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary The 2018 EPI impact evaluation aims to assess the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings resulting from the Efficient Product Installation program.
13.1 Gross Savings For EPI, gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from installing the energy efficient products in participants' homes, regardless of why they participated.43 The Evaluator revised the gross...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of gross savings for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, focusing on energy consumption changes from installing energy-efficient products. The Evaluator revised methods for tracking savings, using values from the 2017 evaluation and adjusting calculations for LED lamps and fixtures.
13.1.1 Unitary Savings Values The Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings values used in the tracking sheet for each product installed through EPI in 2018. For this program component, ENS establishes separate unitary savings values for sing...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed and revised unitary savings values for products installed through EPI in 2018, including adjustments to DHW products and updates based on a more recent study. Lighting product values were found valid, and new products like retractable clotheslines and LED lamps were evaluated for their energy savings.
Table 38: Summary of EPI Tracked and Revised Unitary Savings Values EPI – Single-family Homes EPI – Apartments Products Tracked Savings (kWh/yr) Revised Savings (kWh/yr) Tracked Savings (kWh/yr) Revised Savings (kWh/yr) LED Lamps 9 W Repla...
AI summary Table 38 presents the tracked and revised unitary savings values for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in single-family homes and apartments. The data shows no changes in the savings values for various LED lamp replacements across different wattages.
Summary of EPI Tracked and Revised Unitary Savings Values (Continued) EPI – Single-family Homes EPI – Apartments Products Tracked Savings (kWh/yr) Revised Savings (kWh/yr) Tracked Savings (kWh/yr) Revised Savings (kWh/yr) Other Products LE...
AI summary The document presents a summary of tracked and revised unitary savings values for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program across single-family homes and apartments. It details the energy savings (in kWh/yr) for various products, including LED lights, showerheads, and insulation, and shows changes in savings values for certain items.
Type of Product Peak Demand to-energy Ratio Source Lighting Products (LEDs and LED Nightlights) 0.162 Northeast Residential Lighting Hours-of-Use Study LED Holiday Lights 1.509 Calculated by the Evaluator Faucet Aerators 0.162 RES-Water He...
AI summary The document presents a table of various energy efficiency products with their peak demand to energy ratio and sources, followed by a section titled 'Interactive Effects' which likely discusses the combined impact of these products on energy usage and demand.
Lighting Products The interactive effects factors used by ENS for energy savings are based on a methodology developed by the Evaluator in 2015 and are still valid for 2018. As for peak demand savings, the Evaluator adjusted the methodology...
AI summary The Evaluator updated the interactive effects factors for LED lighting products in 2018, adjusting peak demand-to-energy ratios for specific products and considering the efficiency of heat pumps used in homes with electrical heating. The interactive effects factor for heating was adjusted based on the COP of a heat pump, resulting in an overall factor of -24.0% for electrically heated buildings.
Table 41: EPI Interactive Effects Calculation Results for LED Products Installed Indoors Parameter % of LED Products55 Energy Interactive Effects Factor56 Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Heat Pump Heating and Air Conditioning 15% -2...
AI summary Table 41 presents the interactive effects calculation results for LED products installed indoors, showing varying percentages of energy and peak demand reductions based on different heating and air conditioning configurations. The weighted interactive effects factor indicates an overall energy reduction of -22.2% and a peak demand reduction of -43.0%.
55 The proportions of heating types and participants who use a heat pump or air conditioner are drawn from the 2018 EPI tracking sheet. 56 ADS ASSOCIÉS, Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d'économies d'énergie – résid...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects of energy-saving products based on their installation locations, referencing data from 2017 and 2018 tracking sheets. It highlights how different types of LED lamps have varying indoor and outdoor installation proportions, impacting energy and peak demand savings calculations.
Table 43: EPI Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios by Lighting Product Type Type of Product Peak Demand-to energy Ratio Interactive Effects Factor for Energy Savings Interactive Effects Factor for Peak Demand Savings Adjusted Peak Demand-...
AI summary Table 43 presents EPI adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratios for different lighting product types, including A19 and A21 LED lamps, reflector and decorative LED lamps, LED nightlights, and LED holiday lights. The table includes peak demand-to-energy ratios, interactive effects factors for energy and peak demand savings, and adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratios.
Hot Water Insulation Products In the 2015 Rental Properties & Condos (RP&C) evaluation and for the hot water insulation interactive effects factors, the Evaluator used engineering calculations to account for the duration of the heating and...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of hot water insulation products in the 2015 Rental Properties & Condos (RP&C) program. It highlights the methodology used to calculate energy interactive effects factors, noting differences between apartments and single-family homes due to the location of hot water tanks. Updated factors are provided based on 2018 tracking data.
Table 44: EPI Interactive Effects Factors for Pipe Insulation and Hot Water Tank Wraps Parameter % of Hot Water Insulation Products Energy Interactive Effects During Heating Period Energy Interactive Effects During Cooling Period Single-fa...
AI summary Table 44 presents the EPI interactive effects factors for pipe insulation and hot water tank wraps in different residential and apartment settings, showing the percentage of energy savings during heating and cooling periods.
13.1.5 Effective Useful Life As part of the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values used by ENS in the calculation of energy savings that are expected to persist over time. These EUL values were consistent with those establi...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for energy-saving products used by Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) in 2018. It highlights updates for LED lamps and the retention of EUL values for thermostatic shower valves and retractable clotheslines based on prior evaluations and literature reviews.
Table 45: EPI Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values Tracked Revised Revised Gross Lifetime Unitary Savings (kWh) Products Equivalent EUL (Years) Equivalent EUL (Years) Single family Apartments LED A19 Lamps 9 W Replacing 40 W 6.1 No chan...
AI summary Table 45 presents EPI Equivalent Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various energy-efficient products, including LED lamps, showerheads, and insulation. The table shows the equivalent EUL in years, revised values, and unitary savings in kWh for single-family homes and apartments.
13.1.6 Revised Gross Savings The annual gross savings for each category of products installed in 2018 through EPI are listed below. Table 46 presents the results for single-family homes and Table 47 for apartments. Overall, the total gross...
AI summary The document provides details on the revised gross savings from energy efficiency programs implemented through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2018. It highlights annual and lifetime energy and peak demand savings, along with the weighted average EUL value and line loss factors used in the calculations.
Table 46: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Single-family Homes L E D La m p s Ca f Pr du te t g or o o c y 9 W Re la in p c g 4 0 W 9 W Re la in p c g 6 0 W 9 W Re la in p c g 1 0 0 W 9. 5 W Re la in...
AI summary Table 46 provides revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI Single-family Homes, detailing installation rates, total units, and unit savings values for various lighting products.
Table 47: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI Apartments LED Lamps Category of Product 9 W Replacing 40 W 9 W Replacing 60 W 9 W Replacing 100 W 9.5 W Replacing 40 W 9.5 W Replacing 60 W 9.5 W Replacing...
AI summary Table 47 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category for EPI Apartments, detailing energy savings, installation rates, and lifetime energy savings for different LED lamp replacements. The data includes metrics like unitary savings value, interactive effects factor, and line loss factor.
Table 49: Average Participant Spillover Level for EPI Non-low-income Participants Product Category Average Participant Spillover Level Sample Size Population Size62 Margin of Error Percentage of Gross Energy Savings All Products Owners 3%...
AI summary Table 49 provides data on the average participant spillover level for EPI non-low-income participants, including statistics on sample size, population size, margin of error, and percentage of gross energy savings. The section '13.3 Net Savings' likely discusses the financial implications of these energy savings.
Net savings are defined as the energy-use reductions that are specifically attributable to EPI. Net savings were estimated by applying the above overall NTGR to the gross savings, as exemplified in the following equation: Net Savings = Gro...
AI summary The text explains how net savings from the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program are calculated using the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR). It provides specific figures for energy and peak demand savings in 2018 and estimates the associated CO2 emissions avoided. The calculation method and data sources are outlined.
Table 50: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category for EPI L E D La m p s To l Ne Pe k De d Sa in he Me ( M W ) ta t t t te a m an v g s a r – 0. 0 0 6 0. 6 5 0 0. 0 0 5 0. 0 0 4 0. 0 2 4 0. 0 0 3 L ine Lo Fa to ss...
AI summary Table 50 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings by product category for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, showing data for LED and lamps. The table includes metrics such as total net peak demand savings and line load factor, providing insights into energy efficiency outcomes.
Table 51 compares the energy and peak demand savings established through this evaluation to those tracked in the 2018 tracking sheet.
AI summary Table 51 compares energy and peak demand savings from the current evaluation with those from the 2018 tracking sheet, highlighting changes or updates in savings metrics over time.
Table 51: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated EPI Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 16.093 GWh 14.468 GWh 0.93 13.480 GWh Evaluation Results 15.914 GWh...
AI summary Table 51 compares tracked and evaluated EPI savings at the generator. Evaluated net energy savings are 5% lower than tracked net energy savings, attributed to slight decreases in installation rate, NTGR value, and unitary savings adjustments.
14 EPI RECOMMENDATIONS Having operated in the market for several years, EPI still succeeds in achieving high levels of participation and savings. Moreover, participant satisfaction remains very high. The biggest challenges for EPI in the c...
AI summary EPI has achieved high participation and satisfaction levels but faces challenges due to market saturation and declining opportunities for installing A-type LED lamps. ENS has diversified product offerings, and a key recommendation is to better inform participants about thermostatic shower valves to improve satisfaction and reduce removal rates.
Table 52: Overall Savings for Existing Residential Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings HEA Energy Savings 6.366 GWh 0.90 5.724 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 791 participants 127.258 GWh 0.90 114.488 GWh Peak Demand Savings 1.8...
AI summary Table 52 presents overall savings from existing residential energy efficiency programs, including HEA, Green Heat, and EPI, detailing gross and net savings in energy and peak demand, along with the net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) for each category.
Home Energy Assessment HEA achieved 5.724 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.600 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018, thus falling short of planned energy savings by 7.5 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2...
AI summary In 2018, the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program achieved 5.724 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.600 MW in net peak demand savings, falling short of its planned targets. Participation levels remained stable compared to 2017 and 2016 but decreased significantly from 2015 levels. The program reintroduced non-electrically heated households in July 2018 due to new federal funding. The net energy savings per participant decreased, attributed to revised ORs from billing analyses using the HOT2000 tool.
Green Heat Green Heat achieved 4.227 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 4.042 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, thus surpassing both the planned 3.7 GWh in electrical energy savings and the planned 3.8 MW in peak demand savings....
AI summary Green Heat achieved significant energy savings in 2018, surpassing planned targets. Factors like the removal of pre-approval and increased marketing contributed to higher participation. The program's evaluation highlighted the importance of contractor awareness and participant satisfaction, while also noting challenges with data accuracy in billing analyses.
Efficient Product Installation EPI achieved 12.777 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.463 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018, thus not attaining the planned savings of 17.1 GWh and 2.0 MW respectively. The 2018...
AI summary The Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program achieved lower than planned energy and peak demand savings in 2018 due to declining participation and a shrinking pool of potential participants. ENS diversified product offerings in 2018, which contributed to increased non-A-type lamp replacements and participant satisfaction remained high.
Home Energy Assessment Appendix I HEA: On-site Visits and HOT2000 Simulation Review Protocol Appendix II HEA: Billing Analysis Details Appendix III HEA: 2018 Recommendations
AI summary The document outlines appendices related to the Home Energy Assessment (HEA), including protocols for on-site visits, billing analysis, and recommendations from 2018. These appendices support the assessment process and provide detailed procedures for implementation.
Efficient Product Installation Appendix XI EPI: Participant Survey Questionnaire Appendix XII EPI: Participant Survey Results Appendix XIII EPI: Detailed Calculations of Unitary Savings Values Appendix XIV EPI: Detailed Calculations of Equ...
AI summary The document contains appendices related to the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, including survey questionnaires, results, calculations of savings values, free-ridership algorithms, spillover methodology, and 2018 recommendations. These appendices support the evaluation and implementation of energy efficiency initiatives.
APPENDIX I HEA: ON-SITE VISITS AND HOT2000 SIMULATION REVIEW PROTOCOL File Assessment and Modeling Verification Form To be used for: Level 3, Level 4 and Level 5 Quality Assurance Audits The following sets out the criteria that each evalua...
AI summary This document outlines the criteria for assessing and verifying home energy files through Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5 Quality Assurance Audits. It specifies that each question must be answered with 'Yes', 'No', or 'N/A', and details on how to score the significance of errors.
- 5. Upon completion of the File Assessment and Modeling Verification, enter your name and date in the form (top of form). Quality assurance auditor / Quality Assurance Specialist File number ( D) File number (E :) Date of quality assuranc...
AI summary This section provides a form for quality assurance auditors and energy advisors to complete upon finishing the File Assessment and Modeling Verification process. It includes fields for entering names, dates, building type, service type, and evaluating energy consumption differences and data collection sufficiency.
2018 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report EnerGuide Rating System Outputs: Homeowner Information Sheet Renovation Upgrade Report Follows criteria as per data collection and modelling procedures Yes No N/A Information\nin accordance with the Da...
AI summary This appendix report evaluates the 2018 DSM (Demand Side Management) program, focusing on the accuracy and completeness of homeowner information sheets and renovation upgrade reports. It includes criteria for assessing energy consumption impact, data collection procedures, and report formatting.
Final Sample 161 HEA Evaluation Year 2018 2015 Version of HOT2000 Version 11 Prior to Version 11 Assessment Period Analyzed D only Both D and E Initial Sample 300 887 Minimum Period 6 months 12 months Regression-ready Sample2 207 559 for t...
AI summary The table compares the 2018 and 2015 HEA Billing Analyses, highlighting differences in HOT2000 versions, assessment periods, sample sizes, and regression model criteria used in each analysis.
APPENDIX III HEA: 2018 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 evaluation of the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program component. There were no incomplete 2017 recommendatio...
AI summary This appendix summarizes the 2018 recommendations made by the Evaluator for the Home Energy Assessment (HEA) program component. It notes that there were no incomplete 2017 recommendations at the time of evaluation.
Recommendations
AI summary The document outlines recommendations related to energy efficiency and building performance, including the use of Heating Energy Assessments (HEA) and HOT2000 software for evaluating and improving building energy efficiency.
APPENDIX IV GH: PARTICIPANT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Type of Equipment Quota Sample Mini-split heat pump 40 1,010 Air-source heat pump Ground source heat pump 22 44 Wood or pellet furnace / boiler Wood or pellet stove Solar water heating 28 59...
AI summary This appendix includes a participant survey questionnaire with a table outlining the types of equipment, quotas, and sample sizes for various heating and energy efficiency technologies. It also includes a placeholder for contacting a named individual.
- 2. No - 98. (Don't know) - 99. (Refused) FRM4a. [IF FRM4=1] Before you heard about the Green Heat program, had you already made the decision to install a high-efficiency heat pump model? - 1. Yes - 2. No - 98. (Don't know) - 99. (Refused...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about customer decisions regarding the installation of high-efficiency heat pumps, specifically asking whether they had already decided before learning about the Green Heat program and the influence of various factors on their decision.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses – DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE a. The program rebate Response98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. Information on the benefits of high efficiency heat Response98 Don't Know pumps provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia 99 R...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to a program rebate and information on the benefits of high efficiency heat pumps, with responses indicating 'Don't Know' or 'Refused' as options. The context includes acronyms for Heating Energy Assessment and HOT2000 software.
FRH1. Moving along to another topic… Had you already decided to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT] before you heard about the Green Heat program? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don't know) 99. (Refused) 1. 2. 98. 99. [EQUIPMENT]? Yes No (Don't know)...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question regarding whether a respondent had already decided to install high efficiency equipment before learning about the Green Heat program, and explores the impact of the program's rebate on their decision-making process.
FRH3c. If the program rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed installing the [EQUIPMENT] by at least one year? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FRH4. Next, I'm going to ask you to rate the importa...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer behavior and decision-making regarding the installation of energy-efficient equipment, focusing on the influence of program rebates and prior decisions. It includes questions about likelihood of postponing installation and the importance of various factors in the decision-making process.
READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUENCES - CI1. Before participating in the Green Heat program in 2018, had you at any time in the past already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program? - 1. Yes - 2. No - 9...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document includes survey questions related to the Green Heat program in 2018, assessing participants' prior involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and their exposure to promotional materials. The questions aim to understand the influence of previous participation and promotional materials on participants' decisions to install energy-efficient heating systems.
Barriers [B Series] - B1. For the next few statements, I'd like you to think back to the point when you started to consider installing [a/an] [EQUIPMENT]. On a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 equals "not at all a concern" and 10 equals "a major c...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document asks respondents to rate various concerns related to installing heating equipment on a scale from 0 to 10 and to provide additional concerns if any. It focuses on factors such as equipment selection, reliability, cost, and energy savings.
P1. How did you first become aware of the Green Heat program? 2018 Source of Awareness Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Biomass Sample Size 90 45 22 23 Through a contractor, retailer or distributor 39% 29% 59% 39% Via a friend, acquaintance, or...
AI summary The text discusses how participants became aware of the Green Heat program and the most important reasons for installing heating equipment in 2018. Awareness was primarily through contractors, friends, or online sources, while energy savings was the most significant motivation for installation.
FRH1a. I just want to make sure I understand – before you decided to participate in the Green Heat program, you had already made the decision to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT]? Already Made Decision to Install Equipment Prior to Gre...
AI summary The text discusses participant responses regarding their decision to install high efficiency equipment prior to joining the Green Heat program and their willingness to pay for the equipment without the rebate. The data shows that 64% had already decided to install a heat pump before the program, and the mean willingness to pay full cost was 8.1 out of 10.
FRS2. Efficiency Nova Scotia gave a rebate of $[INCENTIVE] for your new [EQUIPMENT]. If you had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have paid the entire cost of your [EQUIPMENT]? Please answer on a scale of 0 to...
AI summary The text asks respondents to evaluate whether they would have paid for a piece of equipment without receiving a rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, using a scale from 0 to 10.
2018 Likelihood of Actions If Program Not Available Sample Size Mean c. Postponed installing by at least one year 22 3.6 b. Kept your old heating system instead of installing a new one 20 3.0 a. Installed an electrical heating system inste...
AI summary The table presents data on the likelihood of alternative actions if a program was not available in 2018. It shows that 22 respondents postponed installation by at least one year, 20 kept their old heating systems, and 21 opted for electrical heating systems instead of the program's equipment.
CI1. Before participating in the Green Heat program in 2018, had you at any time in the past already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program? 2018 Previous Participation in Another ENS Program Component Total MSHP Heat Pump...
AI summary The text discusses participation in the Green Heat program in 2018 and previous involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. It includes survey data on previous participation rates and the influence of prior participation on decisions to install energy-efficient heating systems.
CI2c. Because of your previous participation in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program and what you learned by participating in this program, you took into account the savings on your energy bill when evaluating different heating systems f...
AI summary The participant considered energy bill savings from previous involvement in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program when evaluating heating systems for their home.
Previous Participation in Another ENS Program 2018 Influenced Decision to Account for Energy Bill Savings When Evaluating Heating Systems Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Biomass Sample Size 35 17 (#) 10 (#) 8 (#) Agree 89% 16 9 6 Disagree 9% -...
AI summary The text discusses survey results from 2018 regarding participants' previous involvement in energy efficiency programs and their awareness of promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia. It highlights that a majority of respondents agreed that energy bill savings influenced their decision to account for heating systems, and that promotional materials were a significant factor in their decision to install equipment.
Cl4b. The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted you to ask a contractor or a distributor about energy efficient heating systems for your home. Promotional Materials Distributed by ENS Were a...
AI summary Promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia influenced consumers to consider energy-efficient heating systems, with a majority agreeing that these materials were a factor in their decision-making process. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the program, with an overall satisfaction rating of 9.0 out of 10.
S2. What was the most important reason you were not more satisfied with the program overall? Most Important Reason Not More Satisfied 2018 with Green Heat Overall Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Biomass Sample Size 10 (#) 5 (#) 2 (#) 3 (#) It...
AI summary Respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the Green Heat program, citing issues such as long wait times for rebates, small rebate amounts, poor communication, and difficulty understanding the program. These concerns were reported by participants who had an overall satisfaction score of 7 or lower.
20 018 Concerns When Considering Installation To Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Solar/ E Biomass of New Equipment Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean The reliability of the equipment 88 8....
AI summary The text presents survey data on concerns related to the installation of new heating equipment, including heat pumps, solar, and biomass. It highlights factors such as equipment reliability, contractor qualifications, energy savings, and cost considerations.
B2. What other concerns, if any, did you have with installing [a/an] [EQUIPMENT]? 2018 Other Concerns with Installation of Equipment Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Biomass Sample Size 90 45 22 23 It wouldn't provide enough heat 10% 20% - - Th...
AI summary The document discusses concerns related to the installation of equipment such as heat pumps and solar/biomass systems, highlighting issues like insufficient heating, reliability, contractor quality, and increased insurance costs. It also outlines the most helpful aspects of the Green Heat program, with the rebate being the most cited benefit.
R2. Other than increase incentives, how could Efficiency Nova Scotia improve the Green Heat program? PROBE: Anything else? 2018 Recommendations to Improve Green Heat Total MSHP Heat Pump Solar/ Biomass Sample Size 90 45 22 23 Advertise the...
AI summary The document explores ways to improve the Green Heat program beyond increasing incentives, citing survey responses. Key suggestions include better advertising, providing more information on equipment, simplifying application processes, and offering additional eligible equipment for rebates. A significant portion of respondents had no recommendations or did not know.
Sampling Methodology As presented in Table 3, to establish the on-site visit sample, the Evaluator considered the distribution of projects and savings among measure categories, as well as the objectives of the 2018 evaluation. At the momen...
AI summary The sampling methodology focused on distributing on-site visits across measure categories, with a significant emphasis on MSHPs due to their high contribution to savings. The methodology also created sub-categories for MSHPs based on the presence of secondary heating systems and increased the ASHP sample size to address lower-than-expected savings.
On-site Visit Protocols The Evaluator prepared a standardized site-visit protocol to collect relevant information. The site-visit protocol was intended to confirm the tracked information and identify those patterns that could impact tracke...
AI summary The Evaluator developed a standardized site-visit protocol to collect information and verify savings data from heat pump and solar installations. The protocol aimed to confirm the functionality of new heating systems and their impact on tracked savings, particularly addressing discrepancies in savings from the 2017 evaluation.
Primary Heating System In the Tracking Sheet Validated On Site Primary Heating Source: Primary Heating System Type: Primary Heating System Capacity: % Total Heating from Primary Source (Participant Declaration): Is the Equipment Still in P...
AI summary The document presents a tracking sheet for heating systems, including primary, secondary, and new heating systems. It collects information on system types, capacities, usage percentages, equipment status, and certification details. The form is used for validation purposes and is part of an energy efficiency or building assessment process.
New System Usage Patterns Location of the New Equipment: Does the New System Serve All Living Space? (Y/N): If not, what % does the system serve? Method of Heat Distribution: Is the New System Used when the Home is NOT occupied? Is the New...
AI summary This section asks about the location and usage of a new heating system, including whether it serves all living spaces, the method of heat distribution, its use when the home is unoccupied, and whether it is the primary heat source.
垂 ECONOLER In the Tracking Sheet In the Spec. Sheet SEER: EER: HSPF Region V: Quantity: Explanation if Quantity Different: Rated Heating Capacity (BTU/h): Rated Cooling Capacity (BTU/h): Low Temp Heating Capacity (BTU/h): COP at -15°C: Hea...
AI summary The document presents a table related to energy efficiency metrics for heating and cooling systems, including SEER, EER, HSPF, and capacity ratings. It includes fields for quantity, explanation of quantity differences, and system configuration details such as loop type and unit compatibility.
Introduction Thank you for taking the time to speak with me. As part of the 2018 evaluation of their Green Heat program, which provides financial incentives for the purchase of high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs), Efficiency Nova...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia is conducting an evaluation of their Green Heat program, which provides financial incentives for high-efficiency mini-split heat pumps. The organization is seeking input from market participants to understand the state and evolution of the MSHP market in Nova Scotia.
Part B: Efficiency of MSHPs First, I want to discuss with you the characteristics of MSHPs that you sell. B1. What is the minimum efficiency level in Region IV of MSHPs that you sell? [PROBE HEATING SEASONAL PERFORMANCE FACTOR (HSPF), COP...
AI summary The discussion centers on the efficiency levels of MSHPs (Mini-Split Heat Pumps) sold in Region IV, including minimum HSPF and COP at -15 degrees Celsius. It also explores the reasons for selling both standard and high-performing cold climate MSHPs, as well as the price differential and contractor adoption rates.
Savings Review of Biomass Measures, Solar Measures and Hybrid Heat Pump Water Heaters The Evaluator reviewed the savings methodologies and calculation values for all biomass and solar measures, as well as hybrid heat pump water heaters (HP...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed the savings methodologies and calculation values for biomass and solar measures, as well as hybrid heat pump water heaters installed under Green Heat in 2018.
Table 4: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Wood and Pellet Stoves Category of Equipment Tracked Energy Savings Value (kWh/year) Tracked Peak Demand Savings Value (kW) Wood Stove with Electrical Resistance Baseline 10,443 4.0 Pellet Stove...
AI summary Table 4 provides tracked unitary savings values for wood and pellet stoves under different baseline scenarios. The data includes energy savings in kWh/year and peak demand savings in kW for each category of equipment.
Revised Savings As in previous years, the Evaluator performed a literature review in search of updated or recently released technical references and metering studies that could be used to refine the unitary savings methodologies for wood a...
AI summary The Evaluator conducted a literature review to find updated technical references and metering studies for refining unitary savings methodologies for wood and pellet stoves. No new resources were found, so calibrated energy simulations remain the most representative source for unitary savings values.
Table 5: Tracked Unitary Savings Values for Wood and Pellet Furnaces and Boilers Category of Equipment Tracked Energy Savings Value (kWh/year) Tracked Peak Demand Savings Value (kW) Wood Furnace or Boiler 13,804 7.66 Pellet Furnace or Boil...
AI summary Table 5 presents tracked unitary savings values for wood and pellet furnaces and boilers, including energy savings in kWh/year and peak demand savings in kW. The table provides data for both types of equipment.
Tracked Savings In 2018, ENS revised their savings calculation methodology for heat pump water heaters to align with the 2015 Efficiency Vermont TRM, which uses the following equation. $$Savings = Q_{DHW} \times \left(\frac{1}{EF_{Base}} -...
AI summary In 2018, ENS updated their savings calculation methodology for heat pump water heaters to align with the 2015 Efficiency Vermont TRM, using a specific equation that includes parameters such as QDHW, EFBase, EFHPWH, and PF Elect Heat.
Table 6: Unitary Savings Values for Heat Pump Water Heaters Parameter Symbol Value for Electrical Resistance Space Heating Value for HP Space Heating Source Heat Delivered to Water in HPWH Tank Annually QDHW 2,618 Efficiency Vermont Energy...
AI summary The table presents unitary savings values for heat pump water heaters, comparing electrical resistance space heating and heat pump space heating. It includes parameters such as heat delivered to water, energy factors, and coefficient of performance. Energy savings are calculated and converted to peak demand savings using an equivalent full-load hour value.
Tracked Savings ENS applied different unitary savings values depending on the energy source used for space heating by each participant prior to installing a MSHP, as detailed in Table 7. 7 Steven Winter Associates Inc., Heat Pump Water Hea...
AI summary ENS used different unitary savings values based on the energy source used for space heating before MSHP installation, as outlined in Table 7 and referenced in technical documents from Efficiency Maine and Mass Save.
Existing Heating System Type Average Tracked Energy Savings Average Tracked Peak Demand Savings Fully Electrically Heated Households 0.169 kWh/BTU/h 2.41 kW Mainly Electrically Heated Households 0.068 kWh/BTU/h 2.71 kW Non-electrically Hea...
AI summary The table presents average energy and peak demand savings for different heating system types. Fully electrically heated households show higher energy savings (0.169 kWh/BTU/h) compared to mainly electrically heated households (0.068 kWh/BTU/h). Peak demand savings are also slightly higher for fully electrically heated households (2.41 kW) compared to mainly electrically heated households (2.71 kW). Non-electrically heated households have significantly higher energy usage (626 kWh) and peak demand (2.34 kW).
Table 8: Definition of Parameters – Energy Savings for MSHPs in Non-electrically Heated Households Acronym Unit Variable Value/Source НС BTU/h Rated heating capacity of the new heat pump Specification data for each installed system (AHRI c...
AI summary The text defines parameters for calculating energy savings from mini-split heat pumps (MSHPs) in non-electrically heated households, including rated heating capacity, heating seasonal performance factors, and full heating load hours. These values are used to calculate peak demand unitary savings for each MSHP.
Peak Demand Savings kW = $$\left(\frac{HC_{min}}{3.412}\right) \left[\frac{1}{COP_{base\ min}} - \frac{1}{COP_{ee\ min}}\right]$$
AI summary The document presents a formula for calculating Peak Demand Savings in kilowatts, which involves the Heating Seasonal Performance Factor (HSPF), Coefficient of Performance (COP), and other energy efficiency metrics.
Electrically Heated Households For each ASHP installed in electrically heated households, ENS uses an average annual savings value of 0.101 kWh per BTU/h of nominal installed heating capacity. This value is the result of a billing analysis...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy and peak demand savings for air source heat pumps (ASHPs) installed in electrically heated households. It provides formulas and values used in these calculations, referencing past evaluations from 2015 and 2017.
Non-electrically Heated Households temperature of -15 °C For participants who installed ASHPs in non-electrically heated households, the tracked energy savings ranged from -147 kWh to 6,770 kWh. The values did not match the unitary savings...
AI summary The energy savings from ASHP installations in non-electrically heated households ranged from -147 kWh to 6,770 kWh, which did not align with the recommended 325 kWh. Peak demand savings were recorded as 0 kW for all such installations.
Table 11: Definition of the Parameters and Corresponding Numerical Values - GSHPs Acronym Unit Variable Value/Source ܥܪ BTU/h Heating capacity of installed system Specification data for each installed system ܥܥ BTU/h Cooling capacity of in...
AI summary Table 11 defines various parameters and their numerical values related to ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs), including heating and cooling capacities, performance factors, efficiency ratios, and load hours. These parameters are essential for evaluating the energy performance of GSHP systems.
Algorithm – Stoves and Solar FRS2. If you had not received the rebate from ENS, would you have paid the entire cost of your [EQUIPMENT]? (Scale 0 to 10) FRS2 = Answer x 10% IF DK OR REF. FRS2 = EMPTY FRS3a. If the program rebate had not be...
AI summary The text outlines a set of questions (FRS2, FRS3a, FRS3b, FRS1, FRS1a) used to assess the impact of a rebate program on the installation of heating equipment. The questions aim to determine whether the rebate influenced the decision to install a new heating system or switch from an old one.
PA3 Score: (10 – FRS4) x 10% FRS3c. If Green Heat rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed installing the [EQUIPMENT] by at least one year? (10 – Answer) x 10% IF 2. DK OR REF: FRS3c = EMPTY
AI summary The PA3 score calculation involves a formula that uses the FRS4 value and considers the likelihood of postponing the installation of equipment if the Green Heat rebate had not been offered, with specific scoring rules for responses.
PA1 Score: MEAN VALUE OF: (FRH2; MIN(FRH3a; FRH3b)) FRH1. Had you already decided to install a high efficiency [EQUIPMENT] before you heard about Green Heat? IF 1. Yes: Use FRH1a IF 2. No OR DK OR REF: FRH1a = 0% FRH1a. [IF FRH1=1] I just...
AI summary The text outlines a scoring methodology for the PA1 Performance Assessment, focusing on whether participants had already decided to install high-efficiency equipment before learning about the Green Heat program. It includes conditional logic for calculating the score based on responses to specific questions.
Section Recommendations 1. Improve the accuracy of the information in the tracking sheet. While reviewing the data for the ducted air-source heat pump (ASHP) billing analysis, the Evaluator noticed that the information on primary and secon...
AI summary The evaluation highlights issues with the accuracy of the Green Heat tracking sheet data, particularly regarding heating system information. It also recommends continuing to monitor barriers to high-efficiency MSHP adoption and improving clarity on eligible ASHP equipment for participants.
INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _________, I am with Corporate Research Associates and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. Our records indicate that you or your household recentl...
AI summary This text outlines an introduction to a survey conducted by Corporate Research Associates evaluating energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. The survey aims to gather feedback from participants of the Efficient Product Installation Service, which involves the installation of energy-efficient products at no cost.
FR - LED Bulbs [ASK IF YES IN V1a] The next questions will be about the LED bulbs , excluding night lights, that you had installed through the service. - FR1. Did you or anyone in your household have specific plans to purchase and install...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the installation of LED bulbs through the Efficient Product Installation Service. It seeks to determine whether participants had prior plans to install LED bulbs and whether they would have paid for them if the service was not available.
[ASK FR4 ONCE, NOT FOR EACH MEASURE (V1a or V1e)] FR4. Next, I'm going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your decision to have energy efficient products installed in your home. Using a scale from 0 to...
AI summary The text requests a rating of the importance of factors influencing the decision to install energy-efficient products in a home, using a scale from 0 to 10, with specific instructions not to provide a range.
READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2) AND (CI3 + CI4) SEQUENCES - CI1. Before participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service in [MONTH/YEAR], had you at any time in the past already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer participation in the Efficient Product Installation Service, asking about prior involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and the influence of promotional materials on their decision to install energy-efficient products.
[ASK ALL] - B5. We would like to understand what the biggest challenges are when it comes to making energy efficiency upgrades in the home. Please tell me how much of a factor, if any, are each of the following in preventing your household...
AI summary The question asks respondents to rate on a scale of 1 to 10 the extent to which various factors prevent them from making energy efficiency upgrades in their homes, including lack of funds, time, information, interest, and conviction about energy savings.
CL1. As part of your participation in the Efficient Product Installation Service, did you receive a free clothesline? 2018 Received a Free Clothesline Tenants (%) Homeowners (%) Total (%) Sample Size 23 22 35 Yes 78% 100% 97% No 22% - 3% B...
AI summary This section of the document asks participants in the Efficient Product Installation Service whether they received a free clothesline, whether they have installed it, and whether they plan to install it. The data shows high participation rates among homeowners and tenants, with most respondents indicating they have received the clothesline, but installation rates are lower.
P2. Were there any other reasons? 2018 Reasons for Participating Most Important Motivation Other Important Motivations Tenants Home owners Total Tenants Home owners Total Sample Size 30 70 100 30 70 100 To save on energy/energy costs 50% 7...
AI summary The table presents survey results on the motivations of tenants and homeowners for participating in energy efficiency programs in 2018. The primary motivation for both groups was saving on energy costs, with homeowners showing a higher percentage (79%) compared to tenants (50%). Other motivations included receiving LED bulbs and environmental concerns, but these were less significant.
P3. Were you home when the installer came to your home to install energy efficient products? 2018 Was Home During Installation Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 30 70 100 Yes 93% 91% 92% No 7% 9% 8% P4. Did your household receive inform...
AI summary The document presents survey data on customer experiences with the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) service in 2018. It includes responses regarding whether customers were home during installation, whether they received information about energy-efficient products, and their interest in receiving such information. The data is segmented by tenants and homeowners.
CI2. For the following statement, please indicate whether you agree or disagree. Your previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program or service and what you learned by participating in this service greatly influenced your deci...
AI summary The statement asks respondents to rate on a scale of 0-10 how much their previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program or service influenced their decision to install energy efficient products in their home.
Participation in Previous Programs or Services Influenced 2018 Decision to Install Energy Efficient Products Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 9 24 34 Mean 10.0 7.8 7.9 Base: Respondents who participated in another ENS service, and who...
AI summary The table shows that in 2018, 9 tenants and 24 homeowners participated in the installation of energy-efficient products, with a mean of 10.0 and 7.8 respectively. The data is based on respondents who had LED bulbs or low flow showerheads installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program.
CI3. Before participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service in [MONTH/YEAR], had you at any time in the past already seen energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia?
AI summary The question asks whether the individual had previously seen energy efficiency promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia before participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service in [MONTH/YEAR].
Recall of ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials 2018 Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 28 68 97 Yes 71% 76% 76% No 29% 65% 65% Don't know - 1% 1% Base: Respondents who had LED bulbs or low flow showerheads installed through EPI, a...
AI summary A 2018 survey found that 76% of respondents who had energy-efficient products installed through EPI reported that promotional materials from Efficiency Nova Scotia greatly influenced their decision. The mean score for influence was 8.0 across both tenants and homeowners.
S7. What problems did you have with the products installed in your home? 2018 Specific Problems with Products Installed Tenants (#) Homeowners (#) Sample Size 4 14 Not user-friendly/difficult to use 1 4 Bulb burnt out 1 4 Caused a leak/iss...
AI summary The text discusses problems encountered with energy efficiency products installed in homes, including issues like difficulty in use, bulb burnout, leaks, and temperature regulation. It also mentions that a portion of respondents were not interested in having recommended energy efficiency products installed in their homes.
B2. Which products did you choose not to have installed? 2018 Products Chosen Not to be Installed Tenants (#) Homeowners (#) Sample Size 4 12 Hot water tank wrap - 4 Showerhead 2 2 Smart power strip - 3 Faucet aerator 1 1 Light bulbs 1 1 H...
AI summary The text discusses responses from tenants and homeowners in 2018 regarding products they chose not to have installed under the Efficient Product Installation Service. It outlines the products not installed and reasons for non-participation, including lack of perceived benefit, cost, and concerns about the service.
R1. Do you have any recommendations that you think would help improve the Efficient Product Installation Service? Anything else? 2018 Participant Suggestions to Improve EPI Tenants Homeowners Sample Size 30 70 100 Offer more products to be...
AI summary The response to R1 provides survey data on participant suggestions to improve the Efficient Product Installation Service (EPI). Most respondents had no recommendations, but a few suggested offering more products, improving communication, and increasing awareness of the service.
R2. Which other energy efficient products would you like to have had installed through the Efficient Product Installation Service? Energy Efficient Products that Respondents Would 2018 Have Liked Installed Tenants Homeowners Total Sample S...
AI summary The text asks respondents about their preferences for energy-efficient products they would like to have installed through the Efficient Product Installation Service and whether they use specific equipment in their homes. It includes survey data from 2018 with responses from tenants and homeowners.
R4. Efficiency Nova Scotia is looking at expanding the products offered as part of the Efficient Service Installation Service. For each of the following products, please tell me how interested you would be in having these products installe...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia is considering expanding the Efficient Service Installation Service by offering additional products. The text requests respondents to indicate their level of interest in having these products installed in their homes.
2018 Tenants Homeowners Total Level of Interest Sample Size Very/ somewhat Interested Sample Size Very/ somewhat Interested Sample Size Very/ somewhat Interested A timer for pool pump 4 1 3 1 7 2 A timer for block heater 2 1 2 2 4 3 Lighti...
AI summary The text presents survey data on consumer interest in energy efficiency measures such as timers for pool pumps and block heaters, lighting controls, weather stripping, and door sweeps. It also includes a question about prior plans to install LED bulbs through the Efficient Product Installation Service.
- FR1a. I just want to make sure I understand before you learned about the Efficient Product Installation Service, you had already made the decision to purchase and install LED bulbs in your home? Already Made Decision to Install LEDs Prio...
AI summary The question asks whether respondents had already decided to install LED bulbs in their homes before learning about the Efficient Product Installation Service. The table shows that 59% of respondents had already made the decision, with 54% of tenants and 60% of homeowners.
Base: Participants that had LED bulbs installed through EPI \ Base: Participants who gave rating of 5 or higher for FR3a \ \ Base: Participants that had a quantity of more than one LED bulb - FR1M2. Did you or anyone in your household have...
AI summary The text discusses survey questions related to participants in the Efficient Product Installation Service, focusing on their prior plans to install low-flow showerheads before learning about the program.
- FR1aM2. I just want to make sure I understand before you learned about the Efficient Product Installation Service, you had already made the decision to purchase and install low-flow showerheads? 2018 Already Made Decision to Install Low-...
AI summary The text discusses a survey on homeowner behavior regarding the installation of low-flow showerheads through the Efficient Product Installation Service (EPI) by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It highlights that very few homeowners had already decided to install low-flow showerheads before learning about EPI, and most would not have paid the full cost of the showerheads without the service.
Installed Additional Products or Retired Appliances 2018 After Participation Tenants Homeowners Total Sample Size 30 70 100 Yes 23% 26% 26% No 77% 73% 73% Don't know/Don't recall - 1% 1%
AI summary The table shows participation rates in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program in 2018, with 26% of participants installing additional products or retiring appliances, while 73% did not participate. The data is broken down between tenants and homeowners.
SO4c. Did you receive an instant rebate at the cashier on the [INSERT ANSWER FROM SO4a] you purchased? 2018 Other Products Installed After Total Participating SO4b. Sample Size Mean Number Purchased and Installed Received an Instant Rebate...
AI summary This section asks if respondents received an instant rebate at the cashier for the product they purchased, with data presented in a table showing responses for various products installed after participation in EPI. The table includes statistics for LED bulbs, faucet aerators, ENERGY STAR refrigerator, clothes washer, and dehumidifier.
SO4d. What appliances, if any, have you retired on your own, that is, outside of a rebate or other assistance from a program, after participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service? Appliances Retired Outside of a Rebate or 2018...
AI summary The text asks respondents about appliances retired outside of a rebate or assistance program after participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service. The table shows that 21% of homeowners retired stoves, 16% retired dishwashers, and 57% reported retiring no appliances.
SO4e. How many [INSERT RESPONSE IN SO4d] have you retired on your own? 2018 Number of Appliances Retired Outside of a Rebate or Assistance from Other Service, after Participating in EPI owners Mean Refrigerators 2 1.5 Freezers 1 1.0 Base:...
AI summary The document provides data on the number of appliances retired outside of rebate or assistance programs after participants engaged in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Refrigerators and freezers are highlighted, with averages provided for 2018.
Influence of EPI on Decision to Install Other Products 2018 Tenants Homeowners Total Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Influence EPI had on decision to install energy efficient products or retire products after participating in EPI 7...
AI summary The table shows that EPI had a positive influence on the decision to install energy efficient products or retire products after participation, with homeowners reporting a higher mean influence (5.7) compared to tenants (3.6). The data is based on respondents who installed additional products or retired appliances after EPI and did not receive financing or rebates from other ENS services.
Don't know/Refused excluded from calculations B5. We would like to understand what the biggest challenges are when it comes to making energy efficiency upgrades in the home. Please tell me how much of a factor, if any, are each of the foll...
AI summary The text seeks to understand the challenges households face in making energy efficiency upgrades, asking respondents to rate the impact of various factors on a scale from 1 to 10.
Challenges to Making Energy Efficiency Upgrades 2018 Tenants Homeowners Total Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Lack of funds 30 7.3 69 6.5 99 6.5 Lack of information about energy efficient products 30 4.5 68 4.9 97 4.9 Not convinced...
AI summary The document presents survey data from 2018 on challenges to making energy efficiency upgrades, highlighting that lack of funds was the most significant barrier, followed by lack of information about energy-efficient products. The data is differentiated between tenants and homeowners.
LED Lamps Table 12 lists the parameters and corresponding values used in Equation 1 below for light-emitting diode (LED) lamps installed through EPI in 2018 and the resulting unitary savings values for each pairing of the old and the new l...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of annual unitary savings for LED lamps installed through EPI in 2018, using Equation 1, which factors in old and new lamp wattages, hours of use per day, and annual conversion.
Table 12: Unitary Savings Values by LED Category Type of LED Old Wattage (W) New Wattage (W) Displaced Wattage (W) Operating Hours (hrs/day) Unitary Savings Value for Single- family Homes (kWh/year) Unitary Savings Value for Apartments (kW...
AI summary Table 12 presents unitary savings values by LED category, showing the energy savings from replacing traditional light bulbs with more efficient LED alternatives in both single-family homes and apartments. The table includes displaced wattage, operating hours, and annual savings in kilowatt-hours.
Displaced Wattage Displaced wattage is defined as the difference between the real wattage value of the old lamp and that of the new LED lamp. Both these values are available in the tracking sheet. In 2018, installed LED lamps had a light o...
AI summary Displaced wattage refers to the difference in wattage between old lamps and new LED lamps. In 2018, 97% of LED lamp installations had equivalent light output wattage to the lamps they replaced, with savings calculations based on real wattage differences in other cases.
Table 13: U Initary Sa avings Va alues for LED N Nightlights Parameter Value for Single-family Homes Value for Apartments Old Wattage [W] 7.0 7.0 New Wattage [W] 0.5 0.5 Average Displaced Wattage [W] 6.5 6.5 Hours of Operation [hrs/day] 12...
AI summary The table provides unitary savings values for LED nightlights in single-family homes and apartments, showing energy savings based on wattage and hours of operation. The data highlights the efficiency of LED lighting compared to traditional lighting.
Equations 2 and 3 are used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for LED Holiday Lights installed through EPI. Annual Unitary Savings $$\left[\frac{kWh}{yr}\right] = \frac{(Displaced\ Wattage)[W] \times HOU\left[\frac{h}{day}\right...
AI summary The text provides equations used to calculate annual unitary savings for LED holiday lights installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Equation 2 calculates the annual savings in kilowatt-hours per year, while Equation 3 calculates the displaced wattage based on the difference between old and new wattage.
Table 14: Unitary Savings Values for LED Holiday Lights Parameter Value for Single- family Homes Value for Apartments Source Average Old Wattage [W] 99.6 99.6 Calculation New Wattage [W] 0.08 W/lamp × 70 lamps/set = 5.6 0.08 W/lamp × 70 la...
AI summary Table 14 presents unitary savings values for LED holiday lights in single-family homes and apartments. It includes parameters like average old wattage, new wattage, displaced wattage, daily hours of operation, days of use per year, and unitary savings in kWh/year.
Parameter Value for Single- family Homes Value for Apartments Source Proportion of Old Large Incandescent Sets Returned (35 lamps per set) 37% 37% 2017 Tracking Sheet Proportion of Old Mini Incandescent Sets Returned (50 lamps per set) 32%...
AI summary The table presents data on the proportion of old incandescent light sets returned for single-family homes and apartments, along with their wattage. The data includes calculations for average old wattage based on return rates and set wattages.
Equation 4 below is used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for the faucet aerators installed through EPI. Annual Unitary Savings $$\left[\frac{kWh}{yr}\right]$$ $$= \frac{\left(DHW_{base} - DHW_{efficient}\right)\left[\frac{gal...
AI summary The document provides equations and parameters used to calculate the annual unitary savings value for faucet aerators installed through the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. The calculations involve domestic hot water consumption, efficiency factors, and conversion constants.
Table 16: Unitary Savings Values for Faucet Aerators Parameter Symbol Value for Single- family Homes Value for Apartments Source Baseline Flow Rate [gpm] Q base 1.39 1.39 DeOreo et al. in Residential End Uses of Water Study Update, as cite...
AI summary Table 16 presents unitary savings values for faucet aerators in single-family homes and apartments, including parameters such as baseline flow rates, number of faucets, water heater efficiency, and calculated energy savings in kWh/year.
Table 17: Unitary Savings Values for Low-flow Showerheads24 Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Baseline Flow Rate [gpm] qbase Variable (2.0 gpm, 2.25 gpm, or 2.5 gpm) Variable (2.0 gpm, 2.25 gpm, or...
AI summary Table 17 outlines unitary savings values for low-flow showerheads in single-family homes and apartments, including parameters such as flow rates, shower usage, and water heater efficiency. These values are calculated based on data from EPI tracking sheets and other studies.
Thermostatic Shower Valves To estimate the unitary savings of thermostatic shower valves, TRMs usually present equations for calculating the unitary savings of low-flow showerheads with modifications to two parameters, namely flow rates an...
AI summary The document discusses the method for calculating unitary savings from thermostatic shower valves using equations similar to those for low-flow showerheads. It details parameters such as flow rate, shower duration, and hot water usage, with a specific focus on the domestic hot water reduction equation and energy savings calculation. A literature review established a behavioural waste time value of 0.98 minutes based on a study referenced by Maine and Pennsylvania.
Table 18: Revised Unitary Savings Values of Thermostatic Shower Valves Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Flow Rate [gal/min or gpm] q Variable Variable 2018 EPI Tracking Sheet (1.5 gpm for low flow...
AI summary Table 18 presents revised unitary savings values for thermostatic shower valves, including parameters like flow rate, number of people per household, and water heater efficiency. The data is sourced from various studies and technical reference manuals, such as the 2018 EPI Tracking Sheet and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission TRM.
Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Unitary Savings [kWh/year] Flow rate of 1.5 gpm 63 51 Calculation Flow rate of 2.0 gpm 84 68 Calculation Flow rate of 2.25 gpm 95 77 Calculation Flow rate of 2.5 gp...
AI summary The table presents unitary savings in kWh/year for different flow rates in single-family homes and apartments. The values are calculated and pertain to pipe insulation.
Hot Water Tank Wrap The following equations are used to determine the annual unitary savings associated with the hot water tank wrap installed through EPI. The algorithm was developed in the 2014 RDI and the 2013 Multi-unit Residential Bui...
AI summary The document explains the calculation of annual energy savings from hot water tank wraps installed through EPI. It references equations and data from evaluations conducted in 2013 and 2014, and includes a table with values used in the calculations.
Table 19: Revised Unitary Savings Values for Hot Water Tank Wraps Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Layer 1: Interior Insulation of Tank External Radius of the Layer [m] re 0.300 0.280 Giant36 Inter...
AI summary Table 19 presents revised unitary savings values for hot water tank wraps, detailing parameters such as thermal resistance, radii, and thermal conductivity for both single-family homes and apartments. The data includes sources like Giant Inc. and calculated values.
Parameter Symbol Value for Single family Homes Value for Apartments Source Heat Transfer Length of the Cylinder [m] L 1.52 1.22 Giant Area of the Top of the Tank [m²] Atop 0.283 0.246 Calculated from Giant's data Temperature at the Externa...
AI summary The text provides a table with parameters related to heat transfer in water heating systems for single-family homes and apartments, including dimensions, temperatures, and energy savings calculations. It also mentions a section on 'Smart Power Controllers for Audiovisual Equipment.'
Retractable Clotheslines Equation 16 is used to establish the unitary savings associated with the retractable clotheslines installed through EPI. 38 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Technical Reference Manual , State of Pennsylvania...
AI summary Equation 16 calculates the energy savings from retractable clotheslines installed through EPI, using parameters such as annual laundry loads, the proportion of loads dried on the clothesline, and energy consumption per load. The table provides values for these parameters in 2018 and the resulting unitary savings.
Table 20: Unitary Savings Values for Retractable Clotheslines Parameter Value for Single- family Homes Value for Apartments Source Number of Laundry Loads per Year [loads/year] 290 290 Hydro-Québec 40 Proportion of Loads Dried on a Clothes...
AI summary Table 20 presents unitary savings values for retractable clotheslines, based on parameters such as the number of laundry loads per year, proportion of loads dried on a clothesline, and energy consumption per load. The Evaluator used a literature review and concluded that the Hydro-Québec study is the most appropriate for estimating laundry habits of EPI participants.
42 Ibid. & lt;sup>40 Ad Hoc Recherche. Marché résidentiel: Rapport d'évaluation. Programme: Produits Mieux Consommer – Électroménagers ENERGY STAR. September 2011. & lt;sup>41 Ontario Power Authority (OPA), 2011 Prescriptive Measures and A...
AI summary The text references a report on residential energy efficiency programs, specifically the 'Produits Mieux Consommer – Électroménagers ENERGY STAR' program, and a document from the Ontario Power Authority. These sources provide insights into energy efficiency measures and assumptions used in 2011.
APPENDIX XIV EPI: DETAILED CALCULATIONS OF EQUIVALENT EUL OF LED LAMPS This appendix presents the details on how the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of LED lamps were calculated with an updated duration pending the changes in Canadi...
AI summary This appendix details the calculation of the equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of LED lamps, considering updated Canadian regulations for general-service lamps. The methodology used is similar to the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, with changes in baseline efficiency affecting the EUL value and lifetime energy savings calculations.
Table 22: Equipment Life Value per LED Lamp Type LED Lamp Type Average Rated Lifetime Hours (hours)48 Annual HOU (hours/year)49 Equipment Life (years) LED A19 Lamps 25,000 986 25 LED Reflector Lamps 25,000 986 25 LED Decorative Lamps 15,00...
AI summary Table 22 provides equipment life value per LED lamp type, including average rated lifetime, annual hours of use, and equipment life in years for different LED lamps installed through EPI in 2017.
LED A19 Lamps For A19 type lamps, the existing incandescent light bulbs have an estimated remaining useful life of one-year. Incandescent light bulbs have a typical rated life expectancy of 1,000 to 2,000 hours.50 The remaining useful life...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of equivalent energy use life (EUL) for LED A19 lamps replacing incandescent bulbs, considering the remaining useful life of incandescent bulbs and the transition to halogen and CFL equivalents. The EUL for LED lamps replacing 40 W, 60 W, and 100 W incandescent bulbs is calculated as six, eight, and ten years, respectively.
Table 23: Baseline Evolution During the EUL of LED A19 Lamps and Resulting Equivalent EUL Replaced Lamp (W) Typical Efficient Lamp Incandescent Baseline 1 Year (2018) Halogen Incandescent Baseline – Canadian Legislation51,52 5 Years (2019-...
AI summary Table 23 presents the baseline evolution during the expected useful life (EUL) of LED A19 lamps and the resulting equivalent EUL, comparing different types of lamps and their displaced wattage over time. The table includes data from 2018 to 2042, reflecting changes in baseline wattage for incandescent, halogen incandescent, and CFL equivalent lamps.
Table 24: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps and Resulting Equivalent EUL Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen Baseline 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline – American Legislation 55 19 Yea...
AI summary Table 24 outlines the baseline evolution and equivalent energy use life (EUL) for LED reflector lamps compared to halogen and CFL equivalents over their useful life. The table shows the displaced wattage and recommended EUL for different lamp wattages.
As for decorative lamps (G25 and chandelier lamps), compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) replacements are not widely available in the market. Using an approximate level of 300 lumens for G25 lamps and E12 chandelier lamps, the baseline wattage v...
AI summary The text discusses the limited availability of compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) replacements for decorative lamps such as G25 and chandelier lamps. It notes that LED lamps are nearly as efficient as baseline incandescent lamps and that savings for decorative lamps are capped until 2024 due to EISA 2020 requirements. The equivalent useful life (EUL) of LED decorative lamps is set at six years for the 2018 evaluation.
Table 25: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Decorative Lamps and Resulting Equivalent EUL Lamp Type Replaced Lamp (W) Typical Efficient Lamp _ n Baseline 2016-2023) Baseline - Legis uivalent - American lation 56 20...
AI summary Table 25 outlines the baseline evolution and equivalent energy use life (EUL) for LED decorative lamps over time, comparing different lamp types and their wattage displacement. It references US federal legislation, specifically the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) 2007, as a basis for the equivalent incandescent wattage.
APPENDIX XV EPI: ALGORITHM FOR FREE-RIDERSHIP CALCULATION The figure below presents the algorithm for calculating the free-ridership level. The participant survey questionnaire included questions designed to assess the planning, quantity,...
AI summary This appendix outlines an algorithm for calculating free-ridership in the context of ENS' energy efficiency programs, specifically the EPI Service. It includes survey questions designed to assess participant behavior and the influence of previous program participation on current energy efficiency decisions.
MEAN VALUE OF (FR2 ; FR3a) PA1 Score: FR1. Did you or anyone in your household have specific plans to purchase and install [LED bulbs/low flow showerheads] prior to learning about the EPI Service? IF 1. Yes: Use FR1a IF 2. No OR DK OR REF:...
AI summary This section asks respondents if they had plans to purchase and install energy-efficient products like LED bulbs or low flow showerheads before learning about the EPI Service, and whether they made the decision prior to being informed about the service.
PA4 Score: FR3b FR3c. [ASK IF (LED bulbs / low flow showerheads and/or showerwands QUANTITY>1] If the service had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have purchased and installed all [QUANTITY] [LED bulbs/ your Showerhe...
AI summary This section of the proceeding asks respondents to consider the likelihood that they would have purchased and installed a specified quantity of energy-efficient products, such as LED bulbs or low-flow showerheads, without the service provided by EPI. The response is used to calculate a PA4 score, with a 10% weighting if the answer is unknown or referenced.
MEAN VALUE OF: (PA1 ; PA2 ; PA3 ; PA4; PA5) CI2/CI4. [Your previous participation in an ENS program or service and what you learned by participating in this program]/[The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by ENS] greatly...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of ENS programs and promotional materials on participants' decisions to install energy-efficient products in their homes, using a scale from 0 to 10. It references the mean value of multiple participation aspects and calculates CI as the maximum of two specific criteria.
APPENDIX XVI EPI: PARTICIPANT SPILLOVER METHODOLOGY Participant spillover was measured using a participant survey. Participants were asked whether, following their participation in the program component, they bought and implemented any add...
AI summary This appendix describes the methodology used to measure participant spillover in the EPI program. It involved surveying participants to determine if they implemented additional energy-efficient products outside of the program's rebate offerings and quantifying the savings and influence of the program on these actions.
The figure below illustrates the methodology used to calculate the participant spillover level. SO1. Since the time that you participated in EPI Service, have you installed any additional energy-efficient products or retired any old applia...
AI summary The text describes a methodology for calculating the participant spillover level based on responses to survey questions about energy-efficient product installations and appliance retirements post-EPI Service participation, including the influence of the service on these actions.
APPENDIX XVII EPI: 2018 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 evaluation of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program component, as well as all 2017 evaluation rec...
AI summary This appendix outlines the 2018 recommendations from the Evaluator for the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program component, including any 2017 recommendations that were not fully implemented.
NHC Overview Administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), NHC encourages homeowners and builders to exceed energy efficiency building code requirements for new homes. Participation in NHC involves completing the following steps: (1) revie...
AI summary The New Home Construction (NHC) program, administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), encourages energy efficiency in new homes by offering incentives based on performance levels. The program was updated in 2017 with a new EnerGuide rating system and again in 2018. A 2018 evaluation included documentation reviews, interviews, and on-site assessments to evaluate program effectiveness.
NHC Performance NHC aimed to achieve 4.6 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.3 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator found that NHC achieved 4.515 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.278 MW in...
AI summary In 2018, the New Home Construction (NHC) program achieved 4.515 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.278 MW in net peak demand savings, representing 2,766 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided greenhouse gas emissions. Participation in the program increased compared to the previous three years, with 652 participants completing projects, including seven in the Passive House pilot.
NHC Process Evaluation Highlights The main evaluation activity of the 2018 NHC process evaluation was a jurisdictional review of new home construction programs in North America. The following five utilities were included in the review: New...
AI summary The 2018 NHC process evaluation reviewed new home construction programs in North America, focusing on outreach, participation processes, incentives, and challenges. Five utilities were included in the review, including New Brunswick Power and Efficiency Vermont.
Outreach and Recruitment ENS uses most of the same activities as other program administrators to conduct outreach and recruit builders to use their programs. Evidence from the interviews revealed that ENS uses at least seven different acti...
AI summary ENS uses seven different outreach activities to recruit builders for NHC programs, including leveraging building permit offices and energy advisors. Other jurisdictions use fewer activities, ranging from three to six.
NHC Recommendations One of the main goals of the 2018 evaluation was to identify ways of improving NHC since past evaluations revealed dissatisfaction with the process and a decrease in both participation levels and savings. From a partici...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of NHC identified the need for increased collaboration between builders and DAs/EAs to improve participation, builder satisfaction, and savings accuracy. While participation increased and energy savings improved, targets were not met. Recommendations include enhancing support for builders through greater involvement of DAs and EAs in the NHC process.
Table 4: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component Program Component 2017 2018 Program Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in 2017 and 2018, focusing on process, market, and impact evaluations across various residential and business energy efficiency programs.
1.1 Description NHC is meant to encourage homeowners and builders to exceed energy efficiency building code requirements in new homes, thus increasing the number of energy efficient dwellings in the province. Since October 2015, NHC has be...
AI summary The New Home Construction (NHC) program aims to encourage energy efficiency in new homes by exceeding building code requirements. Since 2015, it has been funded through DSM funds, and only electrically heated homes are eligible. Energy advisors evaluate house plans and conduct assessments after construction to ensure compliance with energy efficiency standards.
On-site Visits and Simulation Review As part of the evaluation, 10 NHC projects were reviewed. The project reviews consisted of: (1) an on-site visit at participating houses after the completion of the as-built assessment (or N assessment)...
AI summary As part of the evaluation, 10 new home construction projects were reviewed through on-site visits and simulation file verification. The process aimed to validate data collected by energy advisors and ensure assumptions in simulation files reflected actual energy performance. The on-site visits also confirmed the implementation of energy efficiency measures in the new homes, conducted by EcoPlus.
Savings Calculation Review For NHC, energy savings are calculated using the energy consumption values obtained from the HOT2000 simulation models and by applying ORs obtained from a billing analysis. The Evaluator reviewed the different st...
AI summary The savings calculation methodology for new home construction (NHC) and the Passive House pilot is reviewed. Energy savings are calculated using HOT2000 simulation models and overestimation ratios (ORs) from billing analysis. The 2017 evaluation's equations and parameters were reused for the 2018 evaluation.
3 NHC PROCESS EVALUATION This section provides a summary of key findings from a review of NHC documentation, including a recent report[9](#page-6-1) about builder satisfaction with NHC, interviews with program staff, as well as a review of...
AI summary This section reviews the NHC process evaluation, including a builder satisfaction report, interviews with program staff, and comparisons with new home construction programs in other jurisdictions. Table 6 outlines the reviewed organizations and their respective regulatory bodies.
Comparison Staff from the reviewed programs noted a variety of ways they conduct outreach to builders and ENS already uses most of these outreach and recruitment approaches. All jurisdictions use their program website and relationships wit...
AI summary Staff from reviewed programs highlighted various outreach methods used to engage builders, noting that ENS already utilizes most of these approaches. Common methods include program websites and municipal permit offices, while less common methods involve trade associations and service providers.
Comparison Similarly to ENS, most jurisdictions use third parties such as DAs to deliver their new home construction programs. Specifically, three use independent service providers, as is the case for ENS, while one uses a third-party prog...
AI summary The document compares program delivery strategies used by various jurisdictions, noting that most use third-party delivery agents (DAs) similar to ENS. It highlights the use of independent service providers, third-party implementers, and credentialed individuals such as HERS raters.
Comparison The project application review and approval phase typically takes program administrators from three days to four weeks – ENS approvals being within this timeline – and none of the respondents reported any significant complaints...
AI summary The review and approval process for project applications by ENS takes between three days and four weeks, with no significant complaints from builders. Automated alerts are used in some cases to inform builders about application status updates.
Comparison NB Power and ENS differ in their approach to the project construction and inspection phases compared to their peers. NB Power and ENS programs both include preparing a preliminary energy model and conducting a final inspection o...
AI summary NB Power and ENS differ from other programs in their approach to project construction and inspection, as they do not conduct multiple site visits or offer on-site technical assistance during construction. Instead, they rely on preparing a preliminary energy model and conducting a final inspection to verify savings.
Comparison There is no single incentive amount or incentive basis that works for all jurisdictions. Incentive amounts range from less than CAD 1,000[13](#page-13-0) for National Grid Rhode Island and Fortis BC, to CAD 10,000 for NB Power....
AI summary Incentive amounts for energy efficiency programs vary significantly across jurisdictions, ranging from less than CAD 1,000 to CAD 10,000. Programs use different metrics for determining incentives, such as third-party certification scores and savings above code.
Comparison Four jurisdictions offer training opportunities to builders, which were reported as key successes for those programs. One administrator emphasized how training partnerships with industry organizations are important for both buil...
AI summary The document highlights the importance of training partnerships with industry organizations such as HBRA and AIA in four jurisdictions, emphasizing their role in builder training and program outreach. These collaborations help promote programs and keep industry members informed about code updates and industry developments.
Building Envelope Constituents The values related to building envelope constituents were adjusted in eight projects (23 adjustments), and only one contained a geometry error affecting energy consumption by more than 5 percent. Overall, the...
AI summary A review of HOT2000 simulations found that while most building envelope data was accurately recorded, some transcription errors and incorrect assumptions impacted energy consumption estimates. These discrepancies were generally small, with impacts under 5 percent, though one error increased energy consumption by over 20 percent due to incorrect wall perimeter dimensions.
HVAC Equipment Version 15 of EnerGuide includes enhanced specifications for HVAC equipment. The guidelines provided by the new EnerGuide version enabled EAs to successfully collect the specifications for the new equipment during the post-r...
AI summary Version 15 of EnerGuide includes enhanced HVAC equipment specifications, which EAs used during post-retrofit evaluations. A review of 10 files identified 18 errors, mainly related to exhaust fan counts, HRV flow rates, and SEER values, which could affect energy consumption results.
Water Heating Equipment The characteristics associated to domestic hot water (DHW) equipment were also reviewed. The information provided for DHW equipment was accurate and comprehensive, except for in the case of three sites. Errors in th...
AI summary The review of domestic hot water (DHW) equipment found that data was accurate and comprehensive, except for three sites. Two files had errors in tank volume, affecting energy consumption by less than 1 percent. A third file incorrectly recorded a tankless system, but the actual installation of a 76 US gallon electrical tank reduced energy consumption by 13 percent.
4.2 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from the energy efficiency levels achieved in the new homes under NHC. Prior to calculating gross savings, the Evaluator had to adjust the formula use...
AI summary Gross savings are calculated based on energy consumption changes in new homes under NHC. The Evaluator adjusted the formula in the tracking sheet due to manual entries and unclear formulas, making it difficult to ensure consistency in calculations for all participants.
Scenario Number of Participants in the Billing Analysis Difference Between Modelled and Actual Space Heating Consumption Margin of Error OR To-code Model – With Neither Heat Pump Nor Wood/Pellet Stove 400 9% 2% 9% As-built Model – With Hea...
AI summary Table 13 presents overestimation ratio values for new home construction (NHC) under different scenarios, including models with and without heat pumps, showing differences between modelled and actual space heating consumption.
4.2.2 Gross Energy Savings Calculation for Passive House Pilot Savings for the Passive House pilot are calculated by comparing the baseline energy consumption and as-built energy consumption using the following formula: Gross Energy Saving...
AI summary The gross energy savings for the Passive House pilot are calculated by comparing baseline energy consumption with as-built energy consumption using a specific formula that multiplies the as-built energy consumption per square foot by the total floor area.
4.3.2 Spillover (Market Effects) Spillover occurs when participants decide to implement energy efficiency measures in new construction projects without participating in the program component. For NHC, this is measured in the form of market...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of spillover in the context of energy efficiency measures implemented by non-participating builders in new construction projects. The spillover level is calculated using data from the 2018 tracking sheet, builder surveys, and housing market information. The spillover level was measured at 24% in 2018, down from 35% in 2017. The Passive House pilot in 2017 had no measurable spillover due to its novelty in the market.
4.4 Net Savings Net savings represent the savings that can be reliably attributed to a program component. For NHC and the Passive House pilot, net savings are calculated by applying the NTGR value calculation above to the revised gross sav...
AI summary Net savings for NHC and the Passive House pilot are calculated using the NTGR value and revised gross savings. Net energy and peak demand savings are quantified, with net lifetime energy savings estimated at 134.419 GWh for NHC and 1.253 GWh for the Passive House pilot. These savings correspond to avoided CO2 emissions based on Nova Scotia's specific GHG factor.
Table 18: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 5.901 GWh 4.946 GWh 0.90 4.451 GWh Evaluation Results 5.901 GWh 4.806 G...
AI summary Table 18 compares tracked and evaluated energy and peak demand savings at the generator level, showing initial gross savings, adjusted gross savings, NTGR values, and net savings for both ENS Tracked Savings and Evaluation Results.
The savings tracked by ENS were compared with the results established by the Evaluator for 2018. Both the gross energy and peak demand savings calculated as part of the 2018 evaluation are equal to the initial gross savings tracked by ENS....
AI summary The savings tracked by ENS were compared with the 2018 evaluation results, showing that adjusted gross savings are 3% lower due to updated ORs, while net savings are higher due to an increased NTGR value for NHC. For Passive House, the NTGR was revised from 0.90 to 0.39 based on the 2017 evaluation.
Table 19: Overall Participation and Savings for New Residential Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings NHC Energy Savings 4.806 GWh 0.94 4.515 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 652 participants 144.705 GWh 0.94 135.671 GWh Peak Deman...
AI summary Table 19 presents participation levels and energy savings data for new residential programs, including gross and net savings, NTGR, and participant numbers for the Energy Savings and Lifetime Energy Savings programs.
5 NHC RECOMMENDATIONS One of the main goals of the 2018 evaluation was to identify ways of improving NHC since past evaluations revealed dissatisfaction with the process and a decrease in both participation levels and savings. From a parti...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of the NHC program identified ways to improve participation and savings, noting increased project completions and higher net energy savings compared to 2017. The Evaluator recommends increasing support and guidance to builders by involving DAs and EAs more in the NHC process to enhance collaboration, builder satisfaction, and project success.
NHC Appendix I: Interview Guide with Jurisdictions Appendix II: On-site Visits and HOT2000 Simulation Review Protocol Appendix III: 2018 Recommendations
AI summary The document includes appendices related to an interview guide with jurisdictions, on-site visits and simulation review protocols, and 2018 recommendations. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency and housing standards.
Table 1: Overview of Data Collection Activity Descriptor This Instrument Instrument Type In-depth interview Estimated Time to Complete 30 minutes Population Description Program Managers of New Homes Programs in North America Population Cou...
AI summary This table outlines the data collection activity involving in-depth interviews with program managers of New Homes Programs in North America, estimated to take 30 minutes each. The population count is 25+, and the contact list is sourced from Efficiency Nova Scotia Staff and a review of EE program literature.
Program Description: New Home Construction NHC encourages homeowners and builders to exceed energy efficiency building code requirements for new homes. Participation in NHC involves completing the following steps: (1) reviewing a home's pl...
AI summary NHC promotes energy-efficient new home construction by using simulation tools and energy assessments. In 2017, the program had 420 participants and saved 3.6 GWh, with a Passive House pilot project adding 0.02 GWh of savings.
[ASK ALL] Q8. Who delivers the program to builders and homeowners? For example, ENS has four "service organizations" that register participants (builders or homeowners) in the program, then model each home's initial plans and conducts an a...
AI summary The question asks who delivers a program to builders and homeowners, using ENS as an example with four service organizations that register participants and conduct audits. It requests a description of a similar entity in the respondent's program.
[ASK ALL] Q15. During home construction, how often, if at all, does a program representative visit the home? At what stages of the construction do these on-site visits occur?
AI summary This question asks about the frequency and stages of on-site visits by program representatives during home construction.
[ASK ALL] Q18. What steps does a builder or homeowner need to follow to receive their final incentive? Is there a difference between custom and spec homes?
AI summary The question asks about the steps required for a builder or homeowner to receive their final incentive, and whether there is a difference between custom and spec homes.
Home Labels [ASK ALL] Q31. Does your program provide home labels or certification to homes that go through the program? [ If needed: By home labels I am thinking of things like Energy Star, Earth Advantage, or LEED for homes ].
AI summary The question asks whether the program provides home labels or certification to homes that participate, with examples such as Energy Star, Earth Advantage, or LEED for homes.
APPENDIX II ON-SITE VISITS AND HOT2000 SIMULATION REVIEW PROTOCOL Quality assurance auditor / Quality Assurance Specialist: File number (N) Date of quality assurance audit (YYYY/MM/DD): N Energy advisor name: House evaluation date (YYYY/MM...
AI summary This document outlines a quality assurance audit protocol for on-site visits and HOT2000 simulation reviews, including data collection forms and evaluation criteria for energy consumption differences and data sufficiency.
Building Enveloppe Ceiling and roof assembly configurations Wall assemblies Floor header information Exposed floor information Windows Significant window overhangs Doors Foundation Foundation configuration (s) Basement information Crawlspa...
AI summary The text contains a table and images related to building envelope components, mechanical systems, and energy efficiency measures. It includes data collection criteria for photographic requirements and a section for assessing the impact of errors on energy consumption.
Renewables Solar domestic hot water (SDHW) Photovoltaic panels Wind turbines Building Envelope Attic (gable, hip, scissor) Basement wall Pony wall (can be included in basement wall photo) Crawl space Header Exposed floor Half storey Other...
AI summary The text includes tables related to renewable energy technologies, building envelope components, and modelling verification criteria for energy assessments, with a focus on data collection forms, photos, and verification of input parameters for accuracy.
Type Number of single doors Have the doors been placed in the correct wall section/location? Windows in doors (orientation, type)? Double doors or door assemblies (rough opening measurements)? Was the buffering effect added appropriately?...
AI summary The text contains a table with questions related to building efficiency and foundation modeling, including topics such as door placement, window orientation, buffering effects, and foundation configurations. It appears to be part of an evaluation process for energy efficiency assessments.
Blower Door Test / Natural Air Infiltration Ш r ≥ 0.99 Ш 0.5 < n > 1.0 ] Data points < 6% error ELA < 7% error? П Where combustion devices are subject to depressurization, is there evidence of an exhaust devices depressurization test perfo...
AI summary The text contains tables and forms related to energy efficiency assessments, including blower door tests, error evaluation, and authorization forms. It focuses on data collection, validation, and compliance with energy rating systems.
This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the section from which the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary 1. Increase support and guidance to b...
AI summary This appendix summarizes recommendations made by the Evaluator, including increasing support for builders by involving DAs and EAs in the NHC participation process. DAs and EAs are seen as valuable partners in new home construction programs, offering technical assistance and improving builder satisfaction.
BER Performance BER aimed to achieve 50.6 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 7.9 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that BER achieved 75.298 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 11.32...
AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2018, with 75.298 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 11.327 MW in net peak demand savings. This represents a 46,128-tonne reduction in annual GHG emissions. The program's success is attributed to increased participation in Instant Rebates and Mail-in projects.
Interrelations Between the BER Services One of the objectives of the process and market evaluation was to draw a picture of the BER services and what differentiates them to verify whether using different sets of assumptions and calculation...
AI summary The evaluation compared Business Energy Rebates (BER) services, noting similarities and differences between Mail-in and Instant Rebates. It found that both services serve retrofit and new construction projects but differ in eligibility and participant preferences, with Instant Rebates being preferred for its immediate rebates and less paperwork.
Interest and Participation in Non-lighting Measures ENS developed a long-term diversification strategy to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures. The Evaluator assessed participants' interest in and intentions to implement n...
AI summary ENS developed a strategy to promote non-lighting energy efficiency measures. Survey results show that about half of participants plan to implement such measures, with HVAC being the most common category. Contractors suggest adding specific measures and increasing incentives for heating and refrigeration. Many participants use payback thresholds, with most requiring payback periods of five years or less, which may be a barrier for some non-lighting measures.
BER Mail-In The results of the site visits and project reviews revealed that only small adjustments were required to tracked energy savings, in large part due to the improvements made to the participant application forms, which allowed ENS...
AI summary Site visits and project reviews indicated minimal adjustments were needed to tracked energy savings, largely due to improved participant application forms that enabled accurate HOUs tracking. The NTGR was calculated at 0.83 using free-ridership and spillover effects from participant surveys and interviews.
Table 2: Net-to-gross Ratio for BER Mail-in 2018 Free-ridership Level 17% Spillover Level 0% NTGR 0.83 BER Instant Rebates
AI summary Table 2 provides the net-to-gross ratio for BER Mail-in in 2018, showing a free-ridership level of 17% and a spillover level of 0%, with an NTGR of 0.83. The section on BER Instant Rebates likely discusses rebate programs for businesses.
BER Market Evolution Findings ENS has been active in the LED market of the BNI sector through BER since 2010. For a second year, the Evaluator completed a market evolution assessment to establish the level of LED lamp market adoption in No...
AI summary ENS has been promoting LED adoption in the BNI sector through the BER program since 2010. The market share of LED technology is growing, particularly in commercial and industrial sectors. Prices for LED products continue to decline, and the market is approaching maturity. However, regulatory changes may impact the savings potential of certain LED technologies, leading to their removal from the BER program.
BER Recommendations The 2018 impact evaluation revealed that the accuracy of reported savings had improved, especially for Mail-in. In addition, ENS has been proactive in adapting their Instant Rebates offerings to the evolving market by r...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program highlights the need for process improvements, including reviewing eligibility criteria, improving data tracking, connecting participants with non-lighting contractors, and analyzing incentive levels for non-lighting measures. These recommendations aim to enhance program performance and savings accuracy.
BER Instant Rebates Since participant information is not tracked systematically for Instant Rebates, the number of participants is unknown. Available information does indicate the number of rebated measures sold by distributors. Figure 4 b...
AI summary The BER Instant Rebates program saw a significant increase in participation in 2018, with 506,533 rebated measures sold, driven in part by a single customer purchasing 67,311 LED measures. LED downlight lamps contributed the largest share of gross savings in 2018, followed by LED linear fixtures and outdoor LED fixtures. The average unitary savings increased to 150 kWh in 2018.
2 BER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the BER evaluation are as follows: - › Assessing the effectiveness of BER design and delivery - › Reporting on participant and partner perspectives - › Calculating program...
AI summary The BER evaluation objectives include assessing the program's effectiveness, reporting on stakeholder perspectives, calculating energy and GHG savings, and analyzing LED lamp market evolution. The methodology involved document reviews, meetings with program managers, and statistical sampling with a 10% margin of error at a 90% confidence level.
Participant Survey In October and November 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with a total of 70 BER Mail-in participants. The average length of the survey was 17 minutes. The questionnaire and complete survey results are presented in...
AI summary In October and November 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with 70 BER Mail-in participants to gather feedback on various aspects of the program, including awareness, participation reasons, experience, free-ridership, and satisfaction. The survey had an 8.5% margin of error at a 90% confidence level.
Interviews with Contractors As part of the process evaluation, Research Into Action conducted 15 interviews with Mail-in participating contractors in October and November 2018. These interviews mainly served to inform the Evaluator on thre...
AI summary Research Into Action conducted 15 interviews with Mail-in participating contractors in 2018 to evaluate the service, focusing on increasing interest in non-lighting measures, the relationship between Mail-in and Instant Rebates, and the need for rebate adjustments. The interview guide is detailed in Appendix III.
On-site Visits In the fall of 2018, Equilibrium Engineering conducted 78 on-site visits at the facilities of participants who received a rebate through Mail-in. The main purpose of the on-site visits was to validate whether the measures im...
AI summary In 2018, Equilibrium Engineering conducted 78 on-site visits to validate rebate claims and assess energy efficiency measures. The visits aimed to verify implemented measures, collect data on equipment and usage, and assess potential spillover effects and future interest in non-lighting efficiency measures.
Participant Survey In October and November 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with a total of 50 Instant Rebates participants. Of the 50 participants, 30 were end users who had purchased LED lighting measures for their own business and...
AI summary In October and November 2018, CRA conducted a telephone survey with 50 Instant Rebates participants to gather feedback on their reasons for participation, awareness of ENS rebates, and the influence of promotional materials. The survey aimed to understand decision-making processes and project types for eligible measures, with a margin of error of 11.8% at a 90% confidence level.
3 BER PROCESS AND MARKET EVALUATION This section provides a summary of the key findings from a review of BER documentation, participant interviews during site visits, participant surveys, as well as interviews with key ENS staff, Mail-in c...
AI summary This section reviews the Business Energy Rebates (BER) process and market evaluation, addressing three key questions: the interrelation between Mail-in and Instant Rebates, how BER and ENS can encourage non-lighting measures, and the level of satisfaction with BER.
BER Service Offers and Logic for Lighting Measures BER-eligible measures are offered through both Instant Rebates and Mail-in. Instant Rebates provides point-of-purchase rebates through participating distributors, whereas Mail-in requires...
AI summary The BER program offers lighting measures through Instant Rebates and Mail-in services. Instant Rebates provide point-of-purchase rebates, while Mail-in requires applications. Some measures are exclusive to Mail-in, such as high-bay luminaires. In 2018, downlight luminaires and linear replacement lamps were major contributors to savings under both services, while high-bay and pole-mounted luminaires were primarily Mail-in-specific.
New Construction vs. Retrofit The Instant Rebates participant survey sample included 30 end users who purchased eligible lighting measures for their own businesses and 20 contractors who purchased them for clients. For a majority of contra...
AI summary The Instant Rebates and Mail-in programs serve both new construction and retrofit projects. Contractors predominantly purchased lighting measures for new construction, while end users through BER focused more on retrofit projects. The Evaluator found that Mail-in participants mostly used lighting measures for retrofit projects.
Early vs. End of Life Replacement Those Instant Rebates participants who mentioned purchasing their measures for retrofit projects were asked about the state of their existing equipment at the time of replacement. About one-third of partic...
AI summary The analysis shows that Instant Rebates and Mail-in programs are used for both early and end-of-life equipment replacement, with early replacement being more common in Mail-in programs. Most lighting measures were purchased for early replacement, while end-of-life replacements were more frequent in Instant Rebates.
Awareness and Use of BER Services This subsection discusses whether Mail-in participants know about Instant Rebates and vice versa, as well as why participants and contractors choose one service over the other. During the survey, 70 Mail-i...
AI summary The text discusses awareness and use of BER (Business Energy Rebates) services among participants and contractors, highlighting that 24% of Mail-in participants are aware of Instant Rebates, while 46% of Instant Rebates participants know about Mail-in. Reasons for preference include ease of use, immediate rebate delivery, and compatibility with project types.
3.2 Interest and Participation in Non-lighting Measures ENS developed a long-term diversification strategy to encourage the implementation of non-lighting measures. To contribute to this strategy, the subsequent subsections discuss: - › Wh...
AI summary ENS has developed a long-term diversification strategy to promote non-lighting measures. The section outlines who influences participants' choices, their intentions to implement measures in the next two years, barriers to participation in BER and non-lighting measures, and suggestions to increase interest in non-lighting measures.
Instant Rebates According to the Instant Rebates survey, distributors are the primary source of information about the rebate for end users (57%), followed by ENS through direct contact (10%). Of the 20 contractors interviewed during the In...
AI summary The Instant Rebates survey highlights that distributors are the main source of information about rebates for end users, with ENS also playing a role through direct contact. Contractors are key decision-makers in purchasing energy-efficient measures, though some also buy standard measures due to cost or compatibility reasons. Quality is the primary reason for choosing energy-efficient options over standard ones.
Intentions to Implement Measures Two-thirds of surveyed Mail-in participants intend to implement energy efficiency measures in the next two years and many participants plan on implementing non-lighting measures. The most common non-lightin...
AI summary Two-thirds of Mail-in participants plan to implement energy efficiency measures within two years, with HVAC being the most common non-lighting measure category.
Table 7: Mail-in Surveyed Participant Planned Measures (n=47) Measure Type Will Implement Measures in the Next Two Years Lighting 66% HVAC 43% Building Shell 19% Water Heating 17% Industrial Equipment 15% Appliances 4% Kitchen Equipment 4%...
AI summary Table 7 shows that 66% of mail-in surveyed participants plan to implement lighting measures in the next two years, while other measures like HVAC and building shell have lower implementation rates. Most participants intend to implement non-lighting measures, and similar trends are observed in site-visit participants.
Type Will Implement Measures in the Next Two Years HVAC 9% Water Heating 8% Lighting 5% VFD 5% Solar 5% Compressed Air 3% Kitchen 1% Pumps 1% Pool Equipment 1% The principal reason for implementing these measures in the future would be to...
AI summary The table shows the percentage of measures that will be implemented in the next two years across various categories, with the primary motivation being cost savings. Most participants would contact a contractor first, followed by seeking internal approval before implementing any measures.
Barriers to Mail-in Participation and Non-lighting Measures One-third of surveyed Mail-in participants implemented a building upgrade in the last two years without ENS support. Lighting and HVAC were the most popular upgrades reported by M...
AI summary The text discusses barriers to mail-in participation in energy efficiency programs, noting that many participants upgrade without ENS support due to lack of awareness, perceived hassle, or project size. Payback thresholds and the burden of application completion are also identified as barriers, particularly for non-lighting measures.
Suggestions to Generate Interest in Non-lighting Measures According to non-lighting Mail-in contractors, there are no measures that they avoid promoting, and they already promote a range of measure types. Typically, contractors that use th...
AI summary Non-lighting Mail-in contractors promote a range of measures, with HVAC contractors emphasizing heat pumps despite low incentives. Contractors suggest promoting roof-top units and improving control sequencing for better participation. Most participants are satisfied with the current list of BER Mail-in measures, and past participation in ENS programs influences continued engagement.
Satisfaction with BER Incentives Mail-in participants noted that, generally, received incentives were what they expected, and the time to receive the incentives was as anticipated (see Figure 11). Figure 11: Participant Satisfaction with I...
AI summary Participants in the BER program generally found the incentives to be as expected, though some suggested increasing incentives for specific LED products and non-lighting measures. Contractors indicated that higher incentives for HVAC and refrigeration measures could foster more interest in these areas.
Table 9: Participant Improvement Suggestions (n=70) for BER Mail-in Suggestions Count Percent No Improvement Suggestions 42 60% Improvement Suggestions 28 40% Awareness 15 21% Better marketing/awareness 7 10% Provide more information/infor...
AI summary The table outlines participant improvement suggestions for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) mail-in program. Most participants (60%) did not provide suggestions, while 40% did. Key areas for improvement include awareness, process, and rebates, with specific suggestions such as better marketing, more user-friendly forms, and increased rebate amounts.
4 IMPACT EVALUATION FOR BER MAIL-IN The objective of the 2018 BER Mail-in impact evaluation is to determine the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary The 2018 BER Mail-in impact evaluation aims to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, providing insights into the effectiveness of the Business Energy Rebates program.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in (Continued) Ca Me te as ur e g or y K i he tc n W He in te t a r a g Pu in m p g So la r To l fo A l l ta r Ca ies te g or Sa En in er g g s y v Tr ke d G En Sa ing ( G W h ) ac...
AI summary The document presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) mail-in program. It includes various metrics such as adjusted ratios, energy savings, and peak demand savings across different categories and types of energy usage.
Spillover For Mail-in, spillover occurs when participants implement eligible energy efficiency measures due to previous participation in the service, without having received any kind of additional support. The Evaluator conducted on-site v...
AI summary Spillover refers to energy efficiency measures implemented by participants due to previous participation in the service, without additional support. The Evaluator found no spillover effects in 2018, the same as in 2017, and the algorithm used to determine spillover is detailed in Appendix XII.
Table 13: Revised Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Mail-in Ca Me te as ur e g or y C H V A L ig h in t g Re fr ig io t er a n M d V to o rs a n F Ds Co d A m p re ss e ir Ag ic l l tu r u ra En Sa in er g y v g s Re ise d G En Sa...
AI summary Table 13 presents revised net energy and peak demand savings for the BER Mail-in program, detailing energy savings and peak demand reductions across various sectors such as commercial, residential, and agricultural. The table includes metrics like revised gross energy savings, net energy savings, effective life, and peak demand savings in gigawatt-hours and megawatts.
Table 14 compares the energy and peak demand savings established through the 2018 BER Mail-in evaluation to those calculated in the 2018 tracking sheet.
AI summary Table 14 compares energy and peak demand savings from the 2018 BER Mail-in evaluation with those from the 2018 tracking sheet, highlighting discrepancies or updates in the data.
Table 14: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator – BER Mail-in Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 25.235 GWh 25.235 GWh 0.86 21.702 GWh Evaluation Results...
AI summary Table 14 compares tracked and evaluated savings from the BER Mail-in program. Energy savings were 3% lower in evaluation results than tracked values, primarily due to adjustments in lighting, motor, and VFD measure categories. The NTGR decrease also contributed to a 6% difference in net energy savings between tracked and evaluated results.
5 IMPACT EVALUATION FOR BER INSTANT REBATES The objective of the 2018 BER Instant Rebates impact evaluation is to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary The 2018 BER Instant Rebates impact evaluation aims to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings resulting from the program.
5.1 Gross Savings Gross savings refer to changes in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants regardless of their reasons for participating.9 Since eligible measures are tracked at the point of sale, ENS estimates sav...
AI summary Gross savings are calculated based on changes in energy consumption from participant actions, using assumptions rather than real project conditions. In 2018, the Evaluator did not update savings values from 2016 but ensured correct application of existing values. Adjustments to rebated measures, ISRs, PCFs, and EULs are detailed in subsections.
Peak Demand Savings Since no on-site visits were conducted for Instant Rebates in 2018, no PCF specific to the lighting measures sold through the service could be established. Hence, a PCF of 62.4 percent was applied to Instant Rebates. Th...
AI summary The text discusses the application of Peak Cost Factors (PCF) to different energy efficiency measures. A 62.4% PCF was used for indoor lighting measures based on past data, while 100% PCF was applied to outdoor lighting and circulator pumps due to their continuous or predictable usage patterns.
Table 16: Revised Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values by Instant Rebates Measure Category Measure Category Subcategory Tracked Equivalent EUL (Years) Rated Life (Hours) Annual HOU Revised EUL (Years) Revised Equivalent EUL (Years) 1 x...
AI summary Table 16 provides revised equivalent effective useful life values for various instant rebates measure categories, including lighting fixtures, lamps, and pumps, with details on tracked equivalent EUL, rated life, annual HOU, and revised EUL values.
Table 17: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates Ca Me te as ur e g or y L in D F L E ea r ix tu re s L in D La L E ea r m p s Ge l-u d ne ra se a n ive De t L E D co ra La m p s Re f le L E D to c r La m p s...
AI summary Table 17 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, including data across multiple categories such as line D FL, line D La, and others. The table provides numerical values related to energy savings and demand reductions.
Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Me Ca te as ur e g or y D ire io l a d t c na n Ar h i l L E D F ix te tu tu c c ra re s Oc cu p an cy Se ns or s Pu m p s fo To l A l l ta r Me as ur es Tr k...
AI summary The table presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for BER instant rebates, including metrics such as number of units, energy savings in gigawatt-hours, and adjustment ratios for energy savings across different categories.
Table 19: NTGR for BER Instant Rebates Measure NTGR LED Linear Fixtures 0.71 LED Downlight Fixtures 0.66 LED Linear Lamps 0.63 LED General-use and Decorative Lamps 0.68 Other Measures 1.00 Overall Energy Savings 0.72 Peak Demand Savings 0....
AI summary Table 19 presents the Netting and Transfer Guidance Ratio (NTGR) for Bill-Entry Rebates (BER) Instant Rebates across various energy efficiency measures, including LED fixtures and lamps, as well as overall energy and peak demand savings.
Table 20: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates Ca Me te as ur e g or y L E D L in ea r F ix tu re s L E D L in r La ea m p s L E D Ge l-u d ne ra se a n De ive La t co ra m p s D Re L E f le to r La c m p s...
AI summary Table 20 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, including metrics such as energy savings, peak cost factors, and various rebate categories. The data includes numerical values for different LED lighting and fixture types, as well as their corresponding energy and demand savings.
Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for BER Instant Rebates (Continued) Ca Me te as ur e g or y L E D D ire io l a d t c na n Ar h i l F ix te tu tu c c ra re s Oc cu p an cy Se ns or s Pu m p s To l fo A l l ta r Me as ur es Sa E...
AI summary This table evaluates the net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates, showing various metrics such as energy savings in gigawatt-hours, peak demand savings in megawatts, and effective useful life in years across different categories like LED directional and occupancy sensors, pumps, and total measures.
Table 21 below compares the savings tracked by ENS to the 2018 evaluated savings for Instant Rebates.
AI summary Table 21 compares the savings tracked by ENS to the 2018 evaluated savings for Instant Rebates, highlighting the performance of the program over time.
Table 21: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator – BER Instant Rebates Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 76.036 GWh 76.036 GWh 0.73 55.506 GWh Evaluation...
AI summary Table 21 compares tracked and evaluated savings from BER Instant Rebates. Energy and peak demand savings are presented, showing slight differences between tracked and evaluated values. Evaluated savings were slightly lower than tracked savings due to minor adjustments and changes in the NTGR.
7 BER MARKET EVOLUTION ENS has been active in the LED market of the BNI sector through BER since 2010. The 2016 BER evaluation found that market barriers to LED adoption, such as the price of LEDs in the BNI sector, were declining. A marke...
AI summary ENS has been active in the LED market in the BNI sector through the BER program since 2010. The 2016 BER evaluation found that market barriers, such as LED prices, were declining. A 2017 market evolution assessment analyzed key indicators and presented a technology diffusion curve showing LED adoption trends in the Nova Scotia BNI sector. This section updates that data to provide current insights into market transformation.
BER Instant Rebates Rebated Units The total number of LED lamps and fixtures incented by BER Instant Rebates since 2012 is presented in Figure 14 below, along with the proportion of each LED measure type. The increase that occurred in 2013...
AI summary The text discusses the distribution of LED lamps and fixtures incented by BER Instant Rebates from 2012 to 2018, noting a significant increase in 2013 due to rebate and pricing changes by two distributors, followed by continued growth in 2018, with LED downlight fixtures comprising nearly half of all rebated units.
Table 26: Analysis of Key Factors in Program Planning Factor Results Market share of LEDs for BNI sector LED shipments targeted at the commercial and industrial sectors in Atlantic Canada attained 56 percent in 2017. Linear LED lamps make...
AI summary The table discusses the market share, price trends, and readiness of LED technology in the BNI sector. LEDs have achieved significant market penetration, with prices declining, and are expected to meet updated efficiency standards in Canada. No more efficient substitute technology is currently available.
[INTRODUCTION] Hello, my name is _____________ and I am calling from Corporate Research Associates, a Halifax-based survey research company. We are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia....
AI summary A representative from Corporate Research Associates is conducting a survey to evaluate Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates Program. They are contacting participants to gather feedback on their experience with the program in order to help improve it.
- P4. [ASK IF P1=2] Other than the Business Energy Rebates Mail-in program you recently participated in, what Efficiency Nova Scotia program(s), if any, are you aware of? [READ IN ORDER, CODE ALL THAT APPLY] - 1. Business Energy Rebates (B...
AI summary This section of the document asks participants about their awareness and use of Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, focusing on Business Energy Rebates (BER), Small Business Energy Solutions, and other initiatives. It also inquires about the application process and interaction with Efficiency Nova Scotia staff.
FR3c. [IF FR2≥5] If the program rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed implementing the [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures by at least one year? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR4. Using a scale from...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to energy-efficient measure implementation, including the influence of program rebates and information from program representatives, as well as the use of payback period thresholds in decision-making.
[If FR5a=1 and/or FR6b or c=1] - FR7. Has your organization ever implemented energy efficiency projects that had a payback period longer than your standard payback time period ? CODE ONLY ONE - 1. YES - 2. NO - 8. (DON'T KNOW) - 9. (Refuse...
AI summary The document asks whether the organization has implemented energy efficiency projects with payback periods longer than its standard time period, offering options to respond with 'YES', 'NO', 'DON'T KNOW', or 'Refused'.
READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUENCES - CI1. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program in [DATE], had your organization at any time in the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scoti...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document contains a series of questions aimed at understanding the factors influencing participation in the Business Energy Rebates program. It explores prior participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, the influence of promotional materials, and the use of contractors from the Efficiency Trade Network.
APPENDIX II BER: MAIL-IN PARTICIPANT SURVEY RESULTS Note: Due to rounding, certain percentages in the tables of this appendix do not sum to 100 percent.
AI summary This appendix presents the results of a mail-in participant survey related to the Bill-Entry Rebate (BER) program. Due to rounding, percentages in the tables may not add up to 100%.
P1. Prior to your most recent Business Energy Rebates Program incented project, have you participated in projects that received Efficiency Nova Scotia incentives before? Previously Participated in Projects Receiving ENS Incentives Sample S...
AI summary The text asks respondents about their prior participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs before their most recent Business Energy Rebates Program project, with responses indicating that 44% had previously participated. It also explores which specific ENS programs they participated in and how influential past participation was in their decision to join the latest project, with a mean influence score of 8.2.
P4. Other than the Business Energy Rebates Mail-in program you recently participated in, what Efficiency Nova Scotia program(s), if any, are you aware of? Aware of Other ENS Program Components 2018 Sample Size 38 None – Not aware of any EN...
AI summary The text discusses awareness of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs beyond the Business Energy Rebates Mail-in program, with most respondents not being aware of other ENS programs. It also explores reasons for choosing the Mail-in service over Instant Rebates and who completed rebate applications for the most recent project.
P7. Did you interact with any Efficiency Nova Scotia staff during the process of applying for the rebate? Interaction with ENS Staff During Application Process Sample Size 70 Yes 63% No 36% Don't know 1% P8. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 e...
AI summary The text discusses customer interactions with Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) during the application process for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. A majority (63%) of respondents interacted with ENS staff, and overall satisfaction with the service was high, with mean scores ranging from 8.4 to 9.6.
P10. When completing your most recent project through the Business Energy Rebates Mail-in program, did your contractor provide you a choice of Efficiency Nova Scotia programs to participate in? Contractor Provided a Choice of ENS Program C...
AI summary The text asks respondents whether their contractor provided a choice of Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs during participation in the Business Energy Rebates Mail-in program. The results show that only 20% of respondents indicated that they were given a choice, while 74% said no and 6% were unsure. The next question asks what other ENS programs were mentioned by the contractor.
Already Made Decision to Implement Energy Efficient Measures Prior to Program Component 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sample Size 74 70 70 70 Yes 36% 50% 46% 56% No 58% 47% 50% 43% Don't know 5% 3% 4% 1%
AI summary The table shows the percentage of respondents who had already decided to implement energy-efficient measures before the program component in 2015 to 2018. The data includes sample sizes and responses categorized as 'Yes,' 'No,' and 'Don't know.'
FR2. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid your organization $[REBATE VALUE FROM SAMPLE BY CATEGORY] for the energy-efficient [MEASURE CATEGORY] measures. If your organization had not received the rebate from Efficiency Nova Scotia, would you have p...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia provided a rebate for energy-efficient measures. The question asks if the organization would have paid the full cost without the rebate.
Would Have Paid 201 15 2016 2017 201 18 Cost of Project Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0 = "Definitely Would Not Have Paid" 10 = "Definitely Would Have Paid") Paid cost of project 72 5.6 69 6.7 70...
AI summary The text presents survey data on awareness and willingness to pay for energy efficiency programs, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates Program. Respondents were asked about their awareness of premium lighting products and their actions if the program had not been available. Results indicate a moderate level of awareness and a tendency to implement similar measures even without the program.
\ Base: Respondents who would have likely paid full cost of the energy-efficient measure [IF FR2≥5] Results from 2016 are not presented due to wording changes in 2017 FR4. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means "No influence" and 10 mea...
AI summary The text discusses the influence of various factors on the decision to implement energy-efficient measures, using a scale from 0 to 10. It notes that results from 2016 are not presented due to wording changes in 2017, and refers to a figure showing data related to respondents who would have likely paid the full cost of energy-efficient measures.
Influence of Factors in Decision to 201 16 20 17 20 )18 Implement Energy-Efficient Measures Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (0 = "No influence" 10 = "Great influence") The assistance provided by your on-site energy...
AI summary The text presents data on the influence of various factors in the decision to implement energy-efficient measures, with a focus on program rebates and assistance from energy managers. It also includes information on the use of payback period thresholds by companies for making energy efficiency decisions.
FR5c. Just to be sure I understand correctly, you are saying that the measure was already attractive enough in terms of financial payback to be implemented without the rebate? Payback Period was Short Enough 2016 2016 2017 2016 2017 2 Samp...
AI summary The discussion centers on the financial payback period of energy efficiency measures and whether they were attractive enough to be implemented without rebates. It also explores the presence of energy efficiency processes and policies in facilities, and whether projects with longer payback periods were implemented.
CI1. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program in [DATE], had your organization at any time in the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs? Previous Participation in Another ENS Program Comp...
AI summary The text asks about previous participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs before joining the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It includes data on participation rates and how prior ENS involvement influenced decisions to implement energy efficiency measures and examine options for facilities.
C12c. Because of your company's previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program and what was learned by participating in the program, a company representative took into account the cost-effectiveness of energy efficient [MEASUR...
AI summary The company considered the cost-effectiveness of energy-efficient measures due to its previous participation in an Efficiency Nova Scotia program and the insights gained from that experience.
Previous ENS Program Component Participation Led to Assess Product Cost-effectiveness 2016 2017 2018 Sample Size 36 33 34 Agree 89% 91% 79% Disagree 11% 9% 15% Don't know/refused - - 6% Base: Respondents who previously participated in anot...
AI summary This chunk presents survey data on customer participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs and the effectiveness of promotional materials. It shows varying levels of agreement across years regarding the impact of ENS materials on decision-making and product cost-effectiveness.
CI4b. The energy-efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia prompted a company representative to ask a contractor or a technical staff member to examine the energy efficiency options for the facility.
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's promotional materials prompted a company representative to inquire about energy efficiency options for a facility, leading to a request for a contractor or technical staff member to examine the options.
Previously Seen ENS Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials Led to Examine Options for Facility 2016 2017 2018 Sample Size 59 65 53 Agree 61% 62% 53% Disagree 37% 35% 43% Don't know/refused 2% 3% 4% Base: Respondents who previously saw ENS...
AI summary This chunk presents survey data on the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy-efficiency promotional materials on company representatives' decision-making processes, particularly regarding the cost-effectiveness of energy measures. It also includes data on the use of contractors listed on the Efficiency Trade Network under the Business Energy Rebates Program.
CI6. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is not at all important and 10 is very important, when selecting a contractor, how important was it that your contractor be listed on Efficiency Nova Scotia's Efficiency Trade Network?
AI summary The question asks about the importance of a contractor being listed on Efficiency Nova Scotia's Efficiency Trade Network when selecting a contractor, on a scale from 1 to 10.
Importance That Contractor is Listed Under the ETN 2018 Sample Size Mean Mean (1 = "Not at all important" 10 = "Highly important") Influence of past participation 13 7.8 Base: Respondents used a contractor listed on ENS's ETN S1. Using a s...
AI summary The text discusses the importance of contractors being listed under the Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) Energy Trust Network (ETN) and evaluates customer satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program over the years 2016 to 2018. It also highlights reasons for dissatisfaction with the BER program.
Satisfaction with Aspects of 2016 2017 20 18 Satisfaction with Aspects of BER Mail-in Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Sample Size Mean Mean (1 = 'Not at all satisfied', 10 = 'Completel y satisfied ·) Interaction and communication with co...
AI summary The text presents survey data on customer satisfaction with the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on aspects like interaction with contractors, rebate amounts, and the application process. It also includes reasons for dissatisfaction with the program's paperwork and forms.
S4c. Why were you not more satisfied with the rebate amounts? Reasons Not More Satisfied with Rebate Amounts 2016 (%) 2017 (#) 2018 (#) Sample Size 21 16 16 Rebate is too small/Expected higher rebate 86% 13 15 Cost of measures was expensiv...
AI summary The majority of respondents (86% in 2016) were not satisfied with the rebate amounts, citing that the rebate was too small or they expected higher rebates. A smaller percentage (14%) mentioned the cost of measures was expensive, while others provided alternative reasons or indicated they did not know.
S4d. Why were you not more satisfied with the time required to receive rebate? Reasons Not More Satisfied with the Time Required to Receive Rebate 2016 (%) 2017 (#) 2018 (#) Sample Size 24 13 13 Took too long to process/get rebate 75% 11 1...
AI summary The text discusses customer dissatisfaction with the time required to receive rebates and the types of energy efficiency upgrades made without incentives from Efficiency Nova Scotia programs. Key issues include processing delays, lack of communication, and confusing application processes.
B3. Why did you make upgrades without using an Efficiency Nova Scotia program? Reasons for Upgrades Without Using an ENS Program Component 2018 Sample Size 23 I did not know about the ENS program components at the time I made the upgrades...
AI summary Respondents reported reasons for not using Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, with the most common being lack of awareness. Most respondents plan to make upgrades in the next two years, with lighting and HVAC being the most common types of upgrades planned.
B6. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is not at all likely and 10 is highly likely, how likely are you to seek Efficiency Nova Scotia incentives for these future upgrades? 2018 Likelihood of Seeking ENS Incentives for Future Upgrades Sample Si...
AI summary The text presents survey results regarding the likelihood of seeking Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) incentives for future energy efficiency upgrades, with a mean score of 9.7 out of 10. It also includes reasons why some respondents are not considering efficiency upgrades beyond lighting, such as equipment already being efficient or financial constraints.
Overview of Data Collection Activity Descriptor This Instrument Instrument Type In-depth interview Estimated Time to Complete 30 minutes Population Description Contractors familiar with the mail-in rebate program Sampling Strata Definition...
AI summary The document outlines an in-depth interview instrument aimed at contractors familiar with the mail-in rebate program, with data collection managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia and fielded by Research Into Action staff. It also provides a brief description of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program.
Instrument Name: Date: Interviewer: Thanks for taking the time to talk today. I work for Research Into Action, a subcontractor to Econoler, and we have been asked by Efficiency Nova Scotia to conduct the process evaluation for the Business...
AI summary The interview discusses the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, its implementation, and its relationship with other Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs. The focus is on understanding how the program functions for contractors and how to increase interest in non-lighting measures such as pumps and heating and cooling equipment.
Hello [CONTRACTOR] I work for Research Into Action and we are working with Efficiency Nova Scotia to conduct the process evaluation for their Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. As you may know, the BER program is the prescriptive progr...
AI summary Research Into Action is conducting a process evaluation for Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. The evaluation includes interviews with contractors to understand how the program works and how it relates to other ENS programs, with a focus on encouraging interest in non-lighting measures.
[MULTIPLE response] - 1. Lighting or electrical contractor - 2. HVAC contractor - 3. Building shell contractor (insulation, doors, windows, air sealing) - 4. Industrial processes - 5. Compressed air - 6. Plumber - 7. General contractor
AI summary The text lists various types of contractors and professionals involved in energy efficiency and building-related activities, including lighting, HVAC, building shell, industrial processes, compressed air, plumbing, and general contracting.
Interest in Non-lighting Measures [ASK IF Q2<>1] I would like to talk with you about what you think can be done to generate more interest in the program, especially in generating interest in non-lighting measures. [ASK IF Q2 <>1] Q6. What...
AI summary The text discusses interest in non-lighting measures within the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, asking stakeholders about the types of measures they promote, avoid, and the barriers to implementing non-lighting eligible projects.
[ASK IF RESPONDENT IDs UNDER REPRESENTED MARKET SEGMENTS] Q14. What type of measures or equipment do you think would appeal to these market segments? [ASK IF Q2 <>1] Q15. LED lighting measures are increasingly becoming more popular among t...
AI summary The text includes questions about market segments, lighting measures, and the promotion of non-lighting measures or services by ENS and the BER program. It also asks about the percentage of equipment sold through the ENS BER Mail-in program and without incentives.
[ASK IF Q2 <>1] Q17. Which of the following measure types, if any, do you see an opportunity to increase the percentage that you sell that go through the ENS program? Why do you see this an opportunity? [If needed: Are the incentives too l...
AI summary The question asks whether there is an opportunity to increase the percentage of certain measure types sold through the ENS program and why, considering factors such as incentives, knowledge, or other reasons.
BER Mail-in Connections with Other ENS Programs and Services [ASK IF Q2=1] [ASK IF Q2=1] Q19. Other than BER Mail-in, what other ENS programs, if any, do you have experience with?
AI summary This section of the document asks respondents about their experience with other Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) programs in addition to the BER Mail-in program.
[ASK IF NOT SPECIFIED IN Q19] Q20. Are you familiar with the BER Instant Rebate program? [ If needed: This is the program that provides incentives to lighting and pump distributors to offered discounted equipment to contractors .]
AI summary The question asks if the respondent is familiar with the BER Instant Rebate program, which provides incentives to lighting and pump distributors to offer discounted equipment to contractors.
[ASK IF USE OTHER ENS PROGRAM] Q21. How, if at all, do you promote the BER Mail-program to customers using other ENS programs? [ASK IF Q2=1] Q22. How does BER mail-in participation influence your customer's participation in other ENS progr...
AI summary The questions focus on how the BER Mail-in program interacts with other ENS programs, customer awareness of incentives, and potential integration opportunities. They also ask about participation rates and preferences between the BER Mail-in and Instant Rebate programs for different lighting types.
On-site Visit Protocol The on-site visit protocol was only slightly modified from the 2017 BER protocol since eligible measures were similar. The main change for 2018 was adding columns to input the tracked values in addition to the values...
AI summary The on-site visit protocol for 2018 was slightly modified from the 2017 BER protocol, with added columns for tracked values and equipment age. The protocol includes general and measure-specific sections, with data collected from project documentation and on-site visits. Most fields were pre-filled based on ENS-provided information.
3. Facility Operation Hours and Lighting Usage Business Hours (Mon-Fri) Open Weekends? Business Hours Weekends Staff Early open Staff Late Close Cleaning Hours per Week Days/yr with no occupancy (i.e holidays or weekends) Working Days Annu...
AI summary The document contains a table for collecting information about facility operation hours and lighting usage, including business hours, weekend operations, cleaning schedules, and lighting operation schedules for weekdays, weekends, and holidays. It is part of a data collection process for energy efficiency assessments.
4. Measures information Lighting : Collect the information in the table below if lighting measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact declaration. Use additional sheets if required. Econoler will then compare the informati...
AI summary This section outlines procedures for collecting lighting measures information through on-site observation and contact declaration, with Econoler comparing collected data to the tracking sheet.
Is cooling installed in the section with the lighting measure? Yes No Is heating installed in the section with the measure? No The percentage of lighting that remains on when the facility is closed: Validate if lamps are still installed an...
AI summary This document includes a table and protocol for collecting information about lighting measures, including whether cooling or heating is installed, the status of lamps, and details about lighting installation locations and usage. It also includes sections for tracking equipment and notes for additional information.
Motors : Existing Equipment New Equipment Tracking sheet Validation on-site Tracking sheet Validation on-site Location Motor Type HP Rating Nameplate Efficiency Hours/wk Runtime Function Speed (RPM) Quantity Difference (Y/N) Explanation if...
AI summary The document contains a table with information related to motor and VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) equipment, including details about existing and new equipment, their specifications, operational status, and energy consumption. It is used for tracking and validation purposes.
HVAC: Total number of AC & Air-Source Heat Pumps (Split & Unitary) installed: Total number of Ground & Water Source Heat Pumps installed: Are there any other heating and cooling systems than the ones being replaced/installed? (note % of he...
AI summary The document contains a table and form related to HVAC systems, specifically focusing on the installation and performance metrics of air-source and ground-source heat pumps. It includes fields for tracking and validating equipment details, energy efficiency ratios, and operational status.
Refrigeration: Tracking Sheet Validation On-site ECM Measure Location: kW of Evap fan: Quantity: Explanation if quantity is different: Is fan inside low, med or high temp cooler?: Any issues with fans? Strip-curtains, Cooler night covers,...
AI summary The document presents a refrigeration tracking sheet and validation form used to collect detailed information on energy efficiency measures related to refrigeration systems, including fan specifications, cooler types, control measures, and equipment details.
Agriculture: Collect the information in the table below if agriculture measures were installed. Use on-site observation and contact declaration. Use additional sheets if required. The information collected will then be compared with the in...
AI summary The text provides instructions for collecting information on agriculture measures installed, including manufacturer details, model numbers, and technical data. This information will be compared with data in a tracking sheet by Econoler.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site High Efficiency Fans – High Volume Low Speed, Ventilation, Circulation Type (HVLS or vent/circ)? Location Manufacturer: Model Number: Quantity: Explanation if quantity is different: If not, why and since w...
AI summary The document is a tracking sheet used to collect information on energy-efficient equipment and systems in agricultural facilities, including high-efficiency fans, ventilation systems, livestock waterers, and heat pads. It includes fields for equipment type, location, model numbers, and usage data.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Commercial Dish Washers Quantity Installed: Location: Product type Manufacturer: Model number: Is the equipment used for commercial purpose? Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? High or...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and validation form for commercial energy equipment, including dish washers and fryers. It collects data on installation quantity, location, product type, manufacturer, model number, usage, and energy efficiency certification.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Commercial Hot Food Holding Cabinet Manufacturer: Model Number: Quantity: Explanation if quantity is different: Validate the equipment is ENERGY STAR certified: Interior Volume (ft3) Is the equipment still...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet for validating energy efficiency equipment in commercial settings, including hot food holding cabinets, griddles, and refrigeration/freezers. It collects information on manufacturer, model, usage, and ENERGY STAR certification.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Validate the equipment is ENERGY STAR certified: Is the equipment still used? If not, why? Commercial Ice Makers Ice making head Location Quantity Installed: Product Type Manufacturer: Model number: Harves...
AI summary The text presents a tracking sheet for validating the use and certification status of commercial ice makers, including details on equipment type, manufacturer, model, and usage. The form asks whether the equipment is still in use and whether it replaces non-certified ENERGY STAR ice makers.
Tracking Sheet Validation On-site Steam Cookers Quantity Installed: Location: Manufacturer: Model number: Product Type: Operation Days/yr: Operation Hours/yr: Number of pans per unit: Number of pans per day: Explanation if different: Valid...
AI summary The document contains a tracking sheet and validation form for energy-efficient equipment installations, including steam cookers, commercial convection ovens, and griddles. It collects details such as location, manufacturer, model numbers, usage data, and ENERGY STAR certification verification.
INTRODUCTION A – Business with a contact name Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? - 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] - 2. No [ SAY "Perhaps you can help me anyway." GO TO INTRODUCTION] Hello, I am with Corporate Research Associates, and we are pe...
AI summary This section outlines an introductory script used by Corporate Research Associates to conduct a survey with participants of Efficiency Nova Scotia's Business Energy Rebates Program. The script includes steps to identify the appropriate contact, determine the purpose of the purchase, and schedule the survey.
INTRODUCTION B – Business with no contact name Hello, I am with Corporate Research Associates, and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. Our records indicate that you or your orga...
AI summary Corporate Research Associates is evaluating energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia, noting recent participation in the Business Energy Rebates Program by purchasing rebated products from a participating distributor.
FR3b. [ASK IF TOTAL MEASURE CATEGORY QTY>1] If the rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have purchased exactly the same quantity of lighting products that you bought? Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR3c. [A...
AI summary This section of the document includes survey questions related to the influence of rebate programs and information received on purchasing decisions for lighting products. The questions focus on the impact of rebate programs and information from program representatives and distributors on customer behavior.
ASK ALL - READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2a-c) AND (CI3 + CI4a-c) SEQUENCES - CI1. Before buying the rebated lighting products in [DATE], had your organization at any time in the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scotia prog...
AI summary The document contains a series of survey questions aimed at assessing the impact of Efficiency Nova Scotia programs on business decisions regarding energy-efficient lighting products. It explores prior participation in programs and the influence of promotional materials on purchasing decisions.
P5. Were you aware that the [PRODUCT] you purchased were premium products certified by Design Light Consortium or ENERGY STAR®? Aware Product was Certified by Design Light Consortium or ENERGY STAR 2018 Sample Size 49 Yes 67% No 31% Don't...
AI summary The text asks respondents if they were aware that the products they purchased were certified by Design Light Consortium or ENERGY STAR. The data shows that 67% of respondents were aware, 31% were not, and 2% were unsure. The sample size was 49 in 2018.
decision to purchase clients usually ask respondent for advice Bought Standard Products in Past Year 2018 Sample Size 49 Yes 33% No 63% Don't know 4% Base: Respondents who purchased products for their organization or who make the decision...
AI summary The text discusses the purchasing behavior of clients, focusing on the decision-making process for buying standard products. A majority (63%) did not buy standard products in the past year, while 33% did. The primary reason for purchasing standard products was cost-effectiveness (44%).
P7a. For what type of project did you purchase the majority of the [PRODUCT]? Was it for a… Type of Project – Contractors 2018 Sample Size 20 New construction 60% Replacement of existing fixtures or lamps 35% Don't know 5% Base: Contractor...
AI summary The text presents survey data on the types of projects for which the [PRODUCT] was purchased, distinguishing between contractors and end-users in 2018. Contractors primarily purchased the product for new construction (60%), while end-users mainly purchased it for replacing existing fixtures or lamps (80%).
Types of Projects Products were Used For 2018 (#) Sample Size 9 Residential projects 4 Both residential and non-residential projects 5 Base: Contractors who installed LED downlight fixtures or general use/decorative LED lamps P8b. [ASK IF...
AI summary The text provides data on the types of projects LED products were used for in 2018, including residential and non-residential applications. It also asks about the percentage of products purchased for residential use, with responses ranging from 1-25% to 76-100%.
- P10. I just want to make sure I understand When you purchased [PRODUCT], you were unaware that a rebate was given to reduce the product's total cost? Aware of Product Rebate prior to Purchase 2018 Sample Size 50 Yes 92% No 8% P11. [ASK I...
AI summary The proceeding discusses customer awareness of rebates for energy-efficient products, specifically whether customers were aware of the rebate before purchasing and whether they knew it was offered by Efficiency Nova Scotia as part of its Business Energy Rebates Program. Survey results show high awareness in both cases.
FR1a. Had you already decided to purchase [PRODUCT] before knowing that these products were rebated? Already Made Decision to Purchase Product Before Knowing about Rebate 2018 Sample Size 46 Yes 59% No 39% Don't know 2% Base: Respondents w...
AI summary The document presents survey results on customer purchasing behavior regarding rebated products. In 2018, 59% of respondents who were aware of rebates had already decided to purchase products before knowing about the rebate, and 52% had already decided to purchase before knowing the product price. A mean score of 5.7 indicates moderate willingness to pay the full cost of efficient lighting products if rebates were not available.
2018 Actions Taken in Absence of BER Instant Rebates Sample Size Mean Mean (0 = "Very Unlikely" 10 = "Very Likely") If the rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have purchased the exact same model of premium li...
AI summary The table presents survey results from 2018 regarding customer behavior in response to the absence of BER instant rebates. It shows that customers were moderately likely to purchase the same lighting products without the rebate, but less likely to postpone purchases or keep existing fixtures.
FR4. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means "No influence" and 10 means "Great influence", please rate the influence of each of the following in your organization's decision to purchase [PRODUCT]. 2018 Influence of Factors in Decision t...
AI summary The document presents a survey on the influence of various factors in the decision to purchase energy-efficient products, with a focus on the mean ratings from respondents. The program rebate, prevalence of LED products, and information received from distributors and program representatives are discussed.
Don't know/Refused excluded from calculations \ \ Base: Respondents who were aware of rebate and who had existing products that were working and not close to their useful life \ \ \ Base: Respondents who were aware of rebate and who purcha...
AI summary The text provides statistical bases for survey responses related to rebate awareness and product usage, excluding those who declined to answer or were unsure. It references specific conditions for inclusion in calculations and mentions ENS as the entity offering rebates.
CI1. Before buying the rebated lighting products in [DATE], had your organization at any time in the past already participated in any other Efficiency Nova Scotia programs? Previous Participation in Another ENS Program Component 2018 Sampl...
AI summary The text asks whether an organization had previously participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs before purchasing rebated lighting products and explores the impact of such participation on purchasing decisions, including asking about efficient lighting options and evaluating cost-effectiveness.
CI3. Before participating in the Business Energy Rebates program, had you at any time in the past already seen Efficiency Nova Scotia promotional materials advertising the benefits of energy efficiency?
AI summary The question asks whether Efficiency Nova Scotia had previously promoted energy efficiency benefits through promotional materials before a participant joined the Business Energy Rebates program.
Previously Seen Energy Efficiency Promotional Materials Distributed by ENS Sample Size 50 Yes 96% No 2% Don't know 2% CI4a. The energy efficiency promotional materials distributed by Efficiency Nova Scotia were a major factor in the compan...
AI summary The document presents survey results showing that a majority of respondents found Efficiency Nova Scotia's energy efficiency promotional materials influential in their purchasing decisions, prompting inquiries about efficient products and considerations of cost-effectiveness.
IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF RESPONDENT - I1. I'd like to speak with someone in your company/store who is knowledgeable about the stocking and supplying of specific products that were rebated by the program. These products are 1) linear...
AI summary The text outlines a process for identifying and screening a respondent knowledgeable about the stocking and supplying of specific LED products rebated by a program in Nova Scotia. The interview includes questions about product categories and instructions for handling different response scenarios.
ASK IF LINEAR LED FIXTURES WERE REBATED THROUGH THE PROGRAM I have a few questions about your sales of linear LED fixtures that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. This category includes the following measures (as defined...
AI summary The text discusses inquiries regarding the rebate of linear LED fixtures through the Business Energy Rebates Program, specifically referencing Efficiency Nova Scotia's rebate schedule and sales data up to September 2018. It also asks whether the trend in sales of these fixtures is expected to continue or change by the end of 2018.
- B1a. [ASK IF SALES DATA NON AVAILABLE] If the current trend is maintained, do you think you will sell more, less or the same number of LED downlight fixtures by the end of 2018 than the number of units you sold in 2017? If "more" or "les...
AI summary The text includes questions about LED downlight fixture sales trends, the impact of incentives on sales, and the percentage of fixtures sold for residential use. It references the 2018 DSM Evaluation Report and the Business Energy Rebates Program.
1. Same [GO TO B2a] 2. Lower [GO TO B2b] 98. (Don't know) [GO TO B4] 99. (Refused) [GO TO B4] - B2a. [IF SAME] Just to confirm…without the program incentive, you would have sold the same number of LED downlight fixtures this year?
AI summary The text includes a question about the impact of a program incentive on the sale of LED downlight fixtures, asking if the same number would have been sold without the incentive.
- B2b. [IF LOWER] In your estimation, by what percentage would the number of LED downlight fixtures you sold have been lower in 2018, if the Business Energy Rebates Program incentive had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% RECORD EX...
AI summary The text asks about the impact of the Business Energy Rebates Program on the sales of LED downlight fixtures in 2018 and the program's influence on customers' product choices, using a scale from 0 to 10.
RECORD RATING: RECORD EXPLANATION: - B6. Is the incentive ranging from $8 to $15 per fixture enough to encourage customers who would not have done so otherwise to purchase LED downlight fixtures? Why?
AI summary The question asks whether the incentive of $8 to $15 per fixture is sufficient to encourage customers who would not have otherwise purchased LED downlight fixtures.
- C2b. [IF LOWER] In your estimation, by what percentage would the number of LED linear lamps you sold have been lower in 2018, if the Business Energy Rebates Program incentive had not been available? RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% RECORD EXPLANAT...
AI summary The question asks about the estimated percentage decrease in LED linear lamp sales in 2018 if the Business Energy Rebates Program had not been available, with a placeholder for the recorded percentage and explanation.
- D2b. [IF LOWER] In your estimation, by what percentage would the number of general-use/decorative LED lamps you sold have been lower in 2018 if the Business Energy Rebates Program incentive was not available? RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% RECOR...
AI summary The text asks about the impact of the Business Energy Rebates Program on the sales of LED lamps and customers' product choices, specifically comparing LED lamps to incandescent bulbs and CFLs.
RECORD RATING: RECORD EXPLANATION: - D6. Is the current incentive of $3 to $4 per lamp enough to encourage customers who would not have done so otherwise to purchase general-use/decorative LED lamps? Why?
AI summary The question asks whether the current incentive of $3 to $4 per lamp is sufficient to encourage customers who would not have otherwise purchased general-use/decorative LED lamps.
SECTION O: Process Questions - O1. Generally, how aware are contractors that they are getting an incentive from ENS for buying energy efficient equipment through the Business Energy Rebates Instant-Rebate program? - O2. Generally, how awar...
AI summary The section asks about awareness of ENS incentives through the Business Energy Rebates Instant-Rebate program, contractor and customer awareness, and the sufficiency of incentives for specific LED products. It also inquires about familiarity with ENS programs and the distribution of sales through different incentive services.
- b) If less than 8, please explain the reason(s) for your score. Aspects of the program Score Reason 1. The overall program 2. The program support and communications provided by ENS 3. The rebate processing, tracking and reporting - S2. W...
AI summary The text presents a table with aspects of a program and requests explanations for scores, followed by a question about the program's key success over the last year. No specific details about the program or its performance are provided in the text.
Commercial Lighting Measures Thirty-four (34) lighting projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 141 different commercial lighting measures. - › Adjustments were limited, resulting in adjustment ratios of 0.984 for tracked energy savings...
AI summary In 2018, 34 lighting projects were evaluated, with adjustments made to energy and demand savings due to outliers, data discrepancies, and errors. Adjustments included revising HOUs, efficient wattages, and addressing incompatible fixtures. Most metrics were tracked accurately, with high success rates for CF, IE/IEpd, and Wb.
Motor and Variable Frequency Drive Measures Fifteen (15) motor and variable speed drive projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 71 different commercial motor and VSD measures. - › Adjustments were limited, resulting in adjustment ratio...
AI summary In 2018, fifteen motor and variable speed drive projects were evaluated, with adjustment ratios of 0.821 for energy savings and 0.831 for peak demand savings. Adjustments included changes to ESVG and DSVG factors and motor efficiency in one project.
Heating, Ventilation and Air-conditioning (HVAC) Measures Eleven (11) HVAC projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 20 different commercial HVAC measures. - › Adjustments were limited, with adjustment ratios of 0.990 for tracked energy...
AI summary In 2018, eleven HVAC projects were evaluated, with adjustments made to energy and peak demand savings ratios, the use of CIRx Screening Tool values, and AHRI performance ratings. Errors were identified and corrected in several projects, including the use of incorrect values and adjustments for product quantities and baseline conditions.
Commercial Refrigeration Measures Eight (8) refrigeration projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 24 different commercial refrigeration measures. - › Adjustments were required for all revised projects, resulting in adjustment ratios of...
AI summary In 2018, eight refrigeration projects with 24 commercial refrigeration measures were evaluated. Adjustments were made to energy and peak demand savings based on site data, with specific changes to motor and fan parameters. Adjustments were extrapolated due to high margins of error, and no on-site visits were conducted for data collection.
Compressed Air Measures Two (2) compressed air projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising two different commercial compressed air measures. › There were no adjustments required, resulting in adjustment ratios of 1.000 for tracked energy s...
AI summary In 2018, two compressed air projects were evaluated, with no adjustments required, resulting in adjustment ratios of 1.000 for both tracked energy savings and tracked peak demand savings.
Agricultural Measures Five (5) agriculture projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising 13 different commercial agricultural measures. - › Adjustments were required for all revised projects except one, resulting in adjustment ratios of 1.45...
AI summary In 2018, five agricultural projects with 13 commercial measures were evaluated. Adjustments were made to most projects, with energy savings and peak demand savings adjusted by -171,346 kWh and -24.269 kW, respectively. Equipment HOUs were frequently adjusted due to higher usage than tracked values. The CBTU variable was revised to reflect the presence of a milk pre-cooler in one instance.
Commercial Kitchen Measures Four (4) kitchen projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising nine different commercial kitchen measures. - › Adjustments were required for seven of the nine measures, resulting in adjustment ratios of 0.818 for...
AI summary In 2018, four commercial kitchen projects were evaluated, with nine measures identified. Seven measures required adjustments due to inconsistencies in data, leading to energy and peak demand savings adjustments. The EnergyStar calculator was misused in three cases, resulting in revised savings values.
Commercial Pumping Measures Two (2) pumping projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising six different commercial pumping measures. - › Adjustments occurred in two measures, resulting in adjustment ratios of 0.917 for tracked energy savings...
AI summary In 2018, two pumping projects with six commercial pumping measures were evaluated. Adjustments were made to two measures due to discrepancies between the number of pumps installed and operating on-site. Adjustment ratios of 0.917 were applied for energy and peak demand savings, but were not extrapolated due to high margins of error. Gross adjustments of -746 kWh and -0.154 kW were applied to the final tracked savings.
Commercial Water Heating Measures Two (2) water heating projects were evaluated in 2018, comprising two different commercial water heating measures. - › Adjustments were made in both measures, resulting in adjustment ratios of 1.321 for tr...
AI summary In 2018, two commercial water heating projects were evaluated. Adjustments were made to both measures, resulting in specific energy and peak demand savings ratios. One heat pump water heater (HPWH) was installed in a boiler room, leading to a revised Fadj variable to account for higher COP in a warmer environment. One HPWH setpoint was found to be higher than the default value used in the CIRx tool.
APPENDIX IX BER: MAIL-IN ADJUSTMENT RATIO CALCULATION EXAMPLE This appendix presents a sample calculation to demonstrate the process of revising energy and peak demand savings. The motors and VFD vertical category was the second largest fo...
AI summary This appendix provides an example of how to calculate the mail-in adjustment ratio for the Business Energy Rebates program. It focuses on the motors and VFD vertical category, which was a major contributor to energy and demand savings in 2018. The example illustrates algorithms for calculating energy and peak demand savings, as well as the adjustment ratio.
Energy and Peak Demand Savings Algorithms The following algorithms include the parameters required to determine the annual energy savings and annual peak demand savings associated with retrofitting a motor with a VFD. $$\begin{split} Energ...
AI summary The text provides mathematical formulas for calculating annual energy savings and annual peak demand savings from retrofitting a motor with a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD). The formulas use parameters such as horsepower, motor efficiency, and specific saving factors.
Where: - > HP is the rated horsepower of the motor controlled by a VFD - $\rightarrow$ EFF motor is the rated efficiency of the motor controlled by a VFD - > ESVG is the energy savings factor for the motor application, in kWh/HP - > DSVG i...
AI summary The text defines key variables and factors related to motor efficiency and energy savings, including horsepower, motor efficiency, energy savings factor, demand savings factor, and coincidence factor, which are used in calculations for energy savings in motor applications.
Tracked Savings Calculation Parameters for the savings calculation were obtained from the BER Mail-in participant application and factors were taken from the BER CIRx Screening Tool. Table 2 presents the values used for the specific case o...
AI summary The document discusses the parameters used in the Tracked Savings Calculation for a 5 HP motor retrofitted with a VFD, sourced from the BER Mail-in participant application and the BER CIRx Screening Tool.
Table 2: Tracked Variables for Example Calculation Measure – 5 HP Motor Parameter Value Source Rated Horsepower (HP) 5 Tracking Sheet Rated Efficiency of Motor 0.902 Tracking Sheet Energy Savings Factor (kWh/HP) 3,061 Tracking Sheet Demand...
AI summary This section presents a table with tracked variables for an example calculation involving a 5 HP motor, including parameters such as energy savings factor, demand savings factor, and coincidence factor, as well as the resulting tracked energy and demand savings.
The revised savings calculations are based on three adjustments. The first adjustment consisted of revising the ESVG and DSVG values based on the motor use, as identified during an on-site visit. The motor was identified in the application...
AI summary The revised savings calculations involve three adjustments: updating ESVG and DSVG values based on motor use, revising the coincidence factor to 1.0 based on confirmed operational periods, and adjusting the motor's rated efficiency based on on-site observations. These changes were made to align with the actual system configuration and usage patterns.
Baseline Measure – 295 W High Pressure Sodium Lamp Parameter Value Source Rated Horsepower (HP) 5 Validated On-site Rated Efficiency of Motor 0.895 Validated On-site Energy Savings Factor (kWh/HP) 2,344 Calculated Based on the Detailed Sch...
AI summary The document presents a table with baseline measures for a 295 W high pressure sodium lamp, including rated horsepower, efficiency of the motor, energy and demand savings factors, and revised energy and demand savings. It also references an 'Adjustment Ratio Algorithm' section.
APPENDIX X BER: MAIL-IN EFFECTIVE USEFUL LIFE This appendix presents the revised equivalent effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the BER-Mail-in service. First, the EUL of lighting products are presented, followed by the...
AI summary This appendix outlines the revised effective useful life (EUL) of product types offered in the BER-Mail-in service, starting with lighting products and followed by other rebated measures.
Lighting Measures As part of the 2018 evaluation, the Evaluator updated the EUL value of each lighting measure type to account for the approaching scheduled change in regulations. The same methodology as for 2017 was applied. The Evaluator...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation updated the Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values for lighting measures to reflect changes in regulations. The methodology used in 2017 was applied, with the only change being the starting year updated from 2017 to 2018. Adjustments were made to account for increases in baselines over the lifetime of the measure, and specific product types like LED lamps and fixtures had their rated life values modified.
General-use and decorative lamps The methodology used for establishing the equivalent EUL of general-use and decorative lamps is based on the information presented in Table 4 and the equation below. The equivalent EUL calculation is based...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating the equivalent EUL (Energy Use Life) of general-use and decorative lamps, using a baseline of mixed incandescent and halogen incandescent lamps. It assumes a 1,000-hour remaining lifetime for incandescent lamps and a 25,000-hour rated life for LED A-type lamps. The equivalent EUL for general-use lamps is calculated as 4.7 years.
Table 4: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED A-type Lamps Typical Replaced Lamp (W) Typical Efficient Lamp (W) Halogen Incandescent and Incandescent Baseline 1 Year (2018) Ba ncandescent seline s (2019-2023) Lamp (W)...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the baseline evolution of LED A-type lamps over their effective useful life, showing wattage comparisons between typical replaced lamps and efficient lamps, as well as displaced wattage from halogen incandescent and incandescent baselines from 2018 to 2023.
Non-recessed downlight fixtures Since non-recessed LED downlight fixtures replace fixtures using A-type lamps, the methodology for establishing their equivalent EUL is similar to that of A-type lamps. The equivalent EUL calculation is base...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of the Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) for non-recessed LED downlight fixtures, comparing them to traditional incandescent and CFL lamps. It outlines a baseline change in 2024 and provides an equation and table for determining the EUL of 6.3 years.
Table 6: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps in Downlight Fixtures Typical Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen 6 Years (2 CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation 6 5.3 Years (2024-2029) (W) L...
AI summary Table 6 outlines the evolution of baseline energy usage for LED reflector lamps in downlight fixtures during their effective useful life, comparing halogen and CFL equivalents. It includes wattage data and legislative influences on baseline standards.
Other lighting products For products other than general-service lamps, there is no indication that regulations will significantly change over the lifetime of these products. Furthermore, in the case of linear ambient luminaires, linear rep...
AI summary The document discusses the regulation of lighting products beyond general-service lamps, noting that current regulations are already efficient and unlikely to change significantly. It also references the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for revised EUL values, including occupancy sensors, and mentions a summary table of EUL values from BER Mail-in.
Table 7: Revised Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values by Lighting Measure Category L ig h in t g Me as ur e Ca L is t te g or y Tr ke d ac Eq iva le t n u E U L ( ) y ea rs Ra d L i fe te ( ho ) ur s An l H O U nu a ( ho ) ur s Re ise d...
AI summary Table 7 presents revised Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values for different lighting measure categories, including linear LED arrays, fixtures, and high-bay luminaires. The table includes values for EUL in years, runtime in hours, and annual hours of use.
APPENDIX XIII BER: INSTANT REBATES EVALUATED SAVINGS The following subsections present the 2018 evaluated savings values for each product type offered under BER Instant Rebates (referred to as recommended savings), followed by the adjustme...
AI summary This section discusses the 2018 evaluated savings values for BER Instant Rebates, comparing them to 2016 evaluation results and detailing the adjustments made to align the tracked savings with these earlier findings.
Table 9: Recommended Values for Linear LED Fixtures Subcategory Lumens Output (lm) Baseline Wattage (W) Hours of Use 1,500 – 3,500 61.00 1 x 4 Luminaires ≥ 3,500 83.25 4,410 1,500 – 4,500 61.00 2 x 2 Luminaires & Retrofit Kits ≥ 4,500 84.0...
AI summary Table 9 provides recommended values for linear LED fixtures, including lumens output, baseline wattage, and hours of use for various subcategories. Efficient wattage is excluded as actual product wattages are used for Instant Rebates.
Baseline and Efficient Wattages The Evaluator reviewed each category to confirm that the appropriate baseline wattages were applied to the tracked savings as per Table 9 above. The Evaluator found that the correct baseline was applied, wit...
AI summary The Evaluator confirmed that appropriate baseline wattages were applied, except for one transaction affecting 84 fixtures. Efficient wattages were validated against specification sheets, with one product requiring a revision due to a 4.2% difference. Two fixtures showed data entry errors, which were corrected.
Recommended Savings The linear LED lamps category includes LED replacement lamps for both two-foot and four-foot fluorescent lamps. Table 10 below lists the variables recommended in the 2016 Evaluation Report for the savings calculations i...
AI summary The text discusses the 'Recommended Savings' section, focusing on LED lamp replacements for fluorescent lamps. It references the 2016 Evaluation Report and the 2018 Lighting Calculation document by ENS, which defined baseline wattages for different lamp types.
Subcategory Lumens (lm) Baseline Wattage (W) Hours of Use 220 25 4,410 LED Decorative (chandelier) 314 40 4,410 506 60 4,410 < 750 29 4,410 LED Omnidirectional ≥ 750 and < 1,050 43 4,410 (A-lamp and globe) ≥ 1,050 and < 1,490 53 4,410 ≥ 1,...
AI summary The table outlines baseline and efficient wattages for different types of LED lighting products, including decorative chandeliers and omnidirectional lamps, with corresponding lumens and hours of use. This data is relevant for energy efficiency programs and regulations.
Recommended Savings Reflector LED lamps include lamp types such as BR and PAR lamps. The baseline technology used by ENS for each of the four category sizes is halogen lamps. Table 12 lists the baseline wattage values and hours of use reco...
AI summary The document discusses recommended savings for Reflector LED lamps, comparing them to baseline halogen lamps used by ENS. Table 12 provides baseline wattage values and hours of use for the product category.
Recommended Savings The LED downlight fixtures category includes recessed, ceiling-mounted, surface-mounted, and wall sconce fixtures, as well as solid-state and wall sconce retrofit kits. The recommended wattage values and annual hours of...
AI summary The LED downlight fixtures category includes various types of fixtures and retrofit kits. Recommended wattage values and annual hours of use are presented in Table 13. Savings for LED recessed fixtures are based on a halogen lamp baseline, while other subcategories use incandescent halogen lamps as the baseline due to federal energy efficiency regulations.
Table 13: Recommended Values for LED Downlight Fixtures Subcategory Lumens Baseline Wattage (W) Annual Hours of Use ≥ 400 and < 1,000 45 4,410 LED Recessed ≥ 1,000 and < 3,000 90 4,410 ≥ 3,000 250 4,410 < 750 29 4,410 LED Ceiling Mount, LE...
AI summary Table 13 outlines recommended wattage values for various LED downlight fixtures based on lumens and subcategory. The data includes baseline wattage and annual hours of use, which may be relevant for energy efficiency programs and regulations.
Lumens Range of Efficient Luminaires Baseline Fixture Baseline Wattage (W) Annual Hours of Use ≥ 250 and < 1,000 Halogen 37 4,380 ≥ 1,000 and < 5,000 MH (70 W) 95 4,380 ≥ 5,000 and < 15,000 MH (250 W) 295 4,380 ≥ 15,000 and < 30,000 MH (25...
AI summary The table outlines the baseline fixtures and their corresponding wattages for different lumens ranges, providing a reference for efficient luminaires. This information is relevant for energy efficiency programs and regulations.
Overall Adjustment Ratios The above corrections to efficient wattage resulted in an overall adjustment ratio of 1.000 for energy savings and 1.000 for peak demand savings.
AI summary The corrections to efficient wattage resulted in an overall adjustment ratio of 1.000 for both energy savings and peak demand savings.
Recommended Savings The directional and architectural LED fixtures category contains track or mono-point directional luminaires. The baseline technology is halogen lamps generating 17 lumens/W. The recommended variables for this category a...
AI summary The document discusses recommended savings for directional and architectural LED fixtures, comparing them to baseline halogen lamps with a luminosity of 17 lumens/W. The recommended variables for this category are detailed in Table 16.
Recommended Savings Occupancy sensors are tracked as five different categories to distinguish the types of technologies. The recommended energy savings and peak demand savings are unitary values derived from the savings equations used in t...
AI summary Occupancy sensors are categorized into five types to differentiate technologies. Recommended energy and peak demand savings are derived from the 2015 Efficiency Vermont TRM savings equations and summarized in Table 17.
Revised Savings The Evaluator reviewed the tracked variables for each occupancy sensor type to confirm that the appropriate recommended values from Table 17 were applied. The values for Pconn and SVG were found to be accurate for all produ...
AI summary The Evaluator confirmed that the tracked variables for occupancy sensors were accurate, but revised the HOUs from 4,065 hours per year to 3,799 hours per year for all occupancy sensors.
Recommended Savings Pumps are divided into three categories based on the input wattage range of installed pumps, as per Table 18 below. Each input wattage corresponds to unitary savings values for energy and peak demand savings.
AI summary Pumps are categorized based on input wattage ranges, with each category having specific unitary savings values for energy and peak demand savings, as outlined in Table 18.
Table 19: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Recessed Fixtures Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen Baseline 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation 5.3 Years (2024-2029) (W) Lamp (W) Bas...
AI summary The document discusses the baseline evolution of LED recessed fixtures over their effective useful life, comparing different lamp types and their displaced wattage. It references Table 20 and an equation used for calculating equivalent EUL based on 9 W lamps being the most common measure purchased.
$$Equivalent \; EUL = \frac{\Delta W_{Halogen\;Incandescent} \times 6\; Years + \Delta W_{CFL} \times 5.3\; Years}{\Delta W_{Halogen\;Incandescent}} = 7.7\; Years$$
AI summary The document calculates the Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) for lighting technologies, combining the useful life of halogen incandescent and CFL bulbs into a weighted average of 7.7 years.
Table 20: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Non-recessed Fixtures Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen Incandescent Baseline 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation 5.3 Years (2024-2029)...
AI summary Table 20 outlines the baseline evolution of LED non-recessed fixtures over their effective useful life, comparing displaced wattage from halogen incandescent and CFL equivalent baselines. It notes that for certain lighting measures, regulations are unlikely to change over the lifetime of these measures due to their already efficient baseline products.
BER Instant Rebates – Participant Survey FR3. If your organization had not received the rebate and the cost for [PRODUCT] had been about $[REBATE AVERAGE VALUE BY CATEGORY] higher, would you have paid the full cost of the [PRODUCT]? (Scale...
AI summary The survey asks participants about their purchasing behavior regarding energy-efficient products, specifically focusing on whether they would have purchased the product at a higher cost without the BER rebate and whether they would have bought the same model of premium lighting products without the rebate.
PA3 Score: FR3b . [ASK IF TOTAL MEASURE CATEGORY QTY>1] If the rebate had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have purchased exactly the same quantity of lighting products that you bought? FR3c . [ASK IF FR3≥5] If the p...
AI summary The text presents two questions related to a rebate program for lighting products, asking about the likelihood of purchasing the same quantity without the rebate and the likelihood of postponing purchase by at least one year. Responses are quantified as percentages.
BER Instant Rebates – Distributor Interviews FR1. [ASK IF SALES DATA AVAILABLE] If the current trend is maintained, you should sell [FROM SAMPLE: fewer / more] [EFFICIENT PRODUCT] by the end of 2018 than the number of units you sold in 201...
AI summary The document outlines a series of questions posed to distributors regarding the impact of the BER Instant Rebates program on sales trends, customer behavior, and product availability. It includes inquiries about sales data, the influence of incentives, and the effect of product certification requirements on inventory decisions.
This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 evaluation, as well as all 2017 evaluation recommendations that were not fully implemented. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary and participa...
AI summary The appendix summarizes recommendations from the 2018 evaluation and unimplemented 2017 recommendations. It highlights the need to review the logic model and eligibility criteria for Instant Rebates and Mail-in incentives to improve clarity and performance. It also suggests implementing a system to track Instant Rebates sales data and link it to participants for better data collection and analysis.
6.2 Net -to-gross Ratio2 29 6. 2.1 Free-ridership 29 6.3 Net Savings 30 7 В UILD ING OPTIMIZATION MARKET EVALUATION 31 8 В UILD ING OPTIMIZATION IMPACT EVALUATION 32 8.1 Gro ss Savings 32 8. 1.1 Project Review Findings 32 8. 1.2 Interactiv...
AI summary The document outlines various evaluations related to energy efficiency programs, including market evaluations, impact assessments, and the calculation of net-to-gross ratios and net savings. It references follow-up actions on previous evaluation reports and describes the objectives and methodologies used in these assessments.
Table 1: 2018 Overall Participation and Savings for Custom Incentives Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Custom Energy Savings 14.315 GWh 0.81 11.603 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 69 projects completed 196.661 GWh 0.79 156.07...
AI summary Table 1 presents 2018 participation levels and savings for custom incentives, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings across different programs such as Energy Savings, EMIS, and SEM. The table also includes metrics like NTGR and net savings for each category.
Custom Performance Custom aimed to achieve 24.2 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.4 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. Overall, 79 projects generated savings, among which 69 projects were completed. The Evalua...
AI summary Custom achieved 11.603 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.200 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, with 79 projects contributing to these results. The savings correspond to 7,024 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided GHG emissions, and the net lifetime energy savings were 156.077 GWh, with a weighted average effective useful life of 13.5 years.
Retrofit Retrofit accounted for both 77 percent of Custom savings and 84 percent of Custom projects completed in 2018 (58 of the 69 projects with final savings being claimed in 2018). The number of completed projects increased with respect...
AI summary In 2018, Retrofit accounted for a large portion of Custom savings and projects. The evaluation noted improved documentation and participant satisfaction, but also identified issues with quality assurance, non-routine adjustments in M&V calculations, and peak demand savings adjustments. The free-ridership level was measured at 14 percent.
New Construction Impact Evaluation During the site visits, the Evaluator found that all energy efficiency measures had been implemented for the four visited projects. The energy savings were reduced by 36 percent for those four projects be...
AI summary The New Construction Impact Evaluation found that energy efficiency measures were implemented in four projects, but energy savings were reduced by 36% due to errors in energy models. Free-ridership was measured at 36%, and the NTGR applied was 0.64. The program generated 1.500 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.500 MW in net peak demand savings, avoiding 835 tonnes of CO2 eq annually.
Building Optimization In 2018, six projects were completed through Building Optimization service. The 2018 evaluation included a review of three of those projects for which both a project file review and an on-site visit was conducted. Sim...
AI summary In 2018, six Building Optimization projects were completed, with three reviewed through on-site visits and project file reviews. Participant satisfaction was high, but energy savings were reduced by 39% and peak demand savings by 22% due to engineering errors. The net electrical energy savings were 1.184 GWh, avoiding 725 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emissions.
Custom Energy Savings Table 3 below compares the total tracked and evaluated savings for Custom, including savings from Retrofit, New Construction and Building Optimization.
AI summary Table 3 compares total tracked and evaluated savings for Custom Energy Savings, including Retrofit, New Construction, and Building Optimization.
Table 3: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for Custom Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 16.416 GWh 16.416 GWh 0.91 14.944 GWh Evaluation Results...
AI summary Table 3 compares tracked and evaluated savings for energy and peak demand from ENS programs. It shows initial gross savings, adjusted gross savings, NTGR, and net savings for both energy and peak demand categories.
Custom Recommendations Although the number of completed Retrofit projects increased and Retrofit remains the main contributor to overall Custom savings, Retrofit savings decreased significantly in 2018 compared to 2017. New Construction an...
AI summary The 2018 Custom program evaluation highlights a decline in Retrofit savings and challenges in New Construction participation. Key issues include unclear communication about service steps and requirements, low engagement with SPs, and a lack of modellers and architects in the ETN. Recommendations focus on improving communication and engagement strategies to boost participation and service quality.
EMIS Performance EMIS aimed to achieve 0.90 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.2 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that EMIS achieved 1.616 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.0...
AI summary The EMIS program achieved higher-than-expected energy and peak demand savings in 2018, with 1.616 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.051 MW in net peak demand savings. These results contributed to significant GHG emissions reduction and demonstrated the program's effectiveness over time, with a weighted average EUL of 2.3 years.
EMIS Energy Savings To evaluate the energy savings, the Evaluator reviewed the preliminary project documentation provided by ENS to prepare a phone interview for the continuing participant and an on-site visit for the new participant. The...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed EMIS Energy Savings project documentation and conducted interviews and on-site visits to validate energy savings calculations. The new participant used a building automation system for adjustments, leading to a more limited project scope. Savings were accurately tracked, and free-ridership and spillover effects were assumed to be nil due to low market penetration of energy management systems.
Table 4: Comparison of EMIS Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.637 GWh 1.637 GWh 1.00 1.637 GWh Evaluation Results 1.637 GWh 1.6...
AI summary Table 4 compares energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENS with evaluated savings. Evaluated energy savings were 1% lower than tracked savings due to minor changes in the evaluator's calculation and incorrect tracking of the 2017 project by ENS.
Strategic Energy Management SEM helps participants achieve continuous energy savings by offering a structured approach to identifying, prioritizing, and completing energy saving actions through the implementation of energy management polic...
AI summary Strategic Energy Management (SEM) supports participants in achieving continuous energy savings through structured approaches, tools, and training. The 2018 EMIS evaluation involved documentation reviews, interviews, and on-site visits to assess program effectiveness.
SEM Performance SEM aimed to achieve 0.7 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.1 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that SEM achieved 1.455 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.190 M...
AI summary The SEM program aimed for 0.7 GWh in energy savings and 0.1 MW in peak demand reduction in 2018 but achieved 1.455 GWh and 0.190 MW, respectively. These results equate to 891 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided GHG emissions. Four new participants contributed to these savings, with projects starting in January 2018 after launching in the fall of 2017.
SEM Market Evaluation Highlights The four participants were asked questions regarding their satisfaction with SEM, any barriers they encountered, and improvement suggestions. Although satisfaction with SEM was high among participants, two...
AI summary Participants expressed high satisfaction with SEM but faced challenges in implementation, such as integrating SEM into business operations and aligning team efforts. Suggestions for improvement included more in-person support and assistance with prioritizing SEM plans. Most participants had low to medium confidence in maintaining energy consumption tracking without external support.
SEM Energy Savings To evaluate energy savings, the Evaluator reviewed the preliminary project documentation provided by ENS to prepare on-site visits and understand the key operating variables that had been chosen to create the regression...
AI summary The Evaluator assessed the energy savings from the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program in 2018, finding that the tracked savings required minimal adjustments, primarily due to errors in ENS tracking. Peak demand savings were calculated by the Evaluator, and an average effective useful life of three years was applied to the savings. Free-ridership and spillover effects were assumed to be nil, but the Evaluator recommended continued monitoring. A special adjustment was made for a participant who installed high-efficiency lighting through Business Energy Rebates (BER) before starting SEM.
Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.681 GWh 1.681 GWh 1.00 1.681 GWh Evaluation Results 1.681 GWh 1.548 GWh 0.94 1.455 GWh Peak Demand Savings ENS Tracked Savings 0.000 MW 0.00...
AI summary The evaluated gross energy savings were 8% below tracked values due to incorrect tracking of savings from capital projects. An adjustment to savings from a lighting project installed through BER Instant Rebates caused net savings to be 13% lower than tracked savings.
EMIS and SEM Recommendations Both EMIS and SEM achieved their savings targets in 2018 and participation satisfaction remained high. EMIS saw additional incremental savings being achieved in the continuing participant's fourth year of parti...
AI summary EMIS and SEM achieved their savings targets in 2018 with high participant satisfaction. However, participants rely heavily on service providers for energy performance tracking, and many lack the resources to continue independently. The Evaluator recommends reviewing program delivery to improve participant understanding and mastery of energy performance tracking.
Program Component 2017 2018 Program Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R C C Home Energy Assessment C C R Existing Residential Program Gree...
AI summary The table outlines program components and their process and impact evaluations for the years 2017 and 2018, highlighting initiatives such as appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and strategic energy management under residential and business programs.
New Construction In 2018, six projects reported savings under New Construction, five of which were started and completed in the same year and one reported partial savings. As highlighted in Figure 5 below, due to the small number of projec...
AI summary In 2018, New Construction energy savings were at their lowest since inception, with only one project reporting partial savings and low participation levels. The Evaluator investigated ways to increase participation, with findings outlined in Section 5 of the report.
Interviews with New Construction Service Providers In October and November 2018, Research Into Action conducted eight interviews with service providers. The term service providers refers to engineering consultants, modellers, and architect...
AI summary In October and November 2018, Research Into Action conducted interviews with service providers such as engineering consultants and architects to improve participation in New Construction programs and investigate outreach processes, barriers, and satisfaction with ENS.
4 RETROFIT IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2018 Retrofit impact evaluation was to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. As explained in the description, Retrofit includes three types of savings: (1) part...
AI summary The 2018 Retrofit impact evaluation aimed to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, including partial savings, final savings of 2018 projects, and final savings of multi-year projects. In 2018, nine projects achieved partial savings, 44 projects were completed, and 14 multi-year projects claimed final savings.
4.1 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to changes in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by Retrofit participants, regardless of why they participated.5 ENS tracks the annual gross savings of each project. This subsection d...
AI summary Gross savings are defined as changes in energy consumption from Retrofit participant actions, regardless of participation reasons. ENS tracks annual gross savings per project, and this subsection outlines the methodology used by the Evaluator to assess these savings.
4.1.3 Interactive Effects Since interactive effects vary significantly from one Retrofit project to another, they are generally taken into account in the project engineering calculations used to obtain initial gross savings. The calculatio...
AI summary The text discusses the interactive effects in Retrofit projects, emphasizing their variability and the use of standardized methods, such as those from ASHRAE, to calculate lighting project interactions with HVAC systems.
4.2.2 Participant Spillover For Retrofit, participant spillover occurs when participants implement eligible energy efficiency measures due to the influence of previously participating in the service without having had any kind of additiona...
AI summary Participant spillover in the Retrofit program occurs when participants implement energy efficiency measures influenced by prior participation without additional support. In 2018, no significant spillover was found, despite one participant implementing a measure without financing or rebate.
Table 10: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for Retrofit Partial Savings Final Savings for Projects Started and Completed in 2018 Final Savings for Multi-year Projects Total Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy Savings – at the M...
AI summary Table 10 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for retrofit projects, including revised gross energy savings, net energy savings, and peak demand savings at both the meter and generator levels, along with adjustments and factors such as NTGR and line loss.
5.1 Overview of Interviewed SPs New Construction projects require the expertise of an experienced SP to carry out one or more of the required service steps such as identifying measures, quantifying savings, completing M&V and, occasionally...
AI summary The overview discusses the role of Service Providers (SPs) in New Construction projects, emphasizing their expertise in identifying energy-saving measures, quantifying savings, and performing M&V. Data from eight interviewed SPs, including architects, modellers, and consultants, was crucial to the process and market evaluation.
5.2 Awareness of the Service and Engagement with ENS Most SP respondents (5 of 8) have been aware of New Construction (and ENS in general) since the establishment of ENS, while the remainder learned of the service more recently because of...
AI summary Most service providers (SPs) have been aware of Energy Nova Scotia (ENS) since its establishment, though some learned about it later due to client demand. SPs often mention ENS incentives to clients, but external factors like subcontractor roles, fuel exemptions, and project goals can limit engagement. The Efficiency Trade Network (ETN) is underutilized by some SPs, and there is room for improvement in its relevance to professionals like engineers and architects. Most SPs reported positive interactions with ENS staff.
5.3 Satisfaction with New Construction Most SPs (6 of 8) were generally satisfied with the overall service. Moreover, seven SPs noted some level of dissatisfaction with the participation process, mostly relating to understanding service re...
AI summary Most service providers (SPs) were generally satisfied with New Construction, though some expressed dissatisfaction with the participation process, particularly regarding unclear service requirements and difficulties with the ENS website. Participants, however, reported high satisfaction with the program, citing incentives and ENS staff responsiveness as key factors. Some recommendations included improving website clarity, speeding up payments, and extending the service to non-electrical measures.
5.4 Benefits of New Construction Many SPs indicated that New Construction provides their firm with benefits such as the ability to assist participants in designing a more energy efficient building. Additionally, one SP mentioned that the s...
AI summary New Construction programs provide benefits such as assisting in designing energy-efficient buildings, improving market awareness of efficiency, and helping participants forecast operating costs, showcase carbon reduction efforts, offset capital expenditures, and gain more information about building energy efficiency.
6 NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2018 New Construction impact evaluation was to determine the gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. Like Retrofit, New Construction claims three types of savings:...
AI summary The 2018 New Construction impact evaluation aimed to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. The evaluation categorized savings into partial, final for current year projects, and final for multi-year projects. In 2018, one project had partial savings, five projects had final savings, and no multi-year projects had final savings that year.
8.1.4 Revised Gross Savings For Building Optimization, the gross savings at the generator were established at 1.184 GWh and 0.027 MW for energy and peak demand savings respectively, as outlined in Table 15 below. The gross lifetime energy...
AI summary The gross savings for Building Optimization are reported as 1.184 GWh for energy and 0.027 MW for peak demand savings, with a total lifetime energy savings of 7.981 GWh. The data is supported by a study from SBW Consulting cited in the text.
Table 15: Revised Gross Energy for Building Optimization Partial Savings Final Savings for Projects Started and Completed in 2018 Final Savings for Multi-year Projects Total Number of Projects 0 6 0 6 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Sa...
AI summary Table 15 provides data on energy and peak demand savings from building optimization projects, including tracked gross energy savings, adjustment ratios, and lifetime energy savings. Section 8.2 discusses the net-to-gross ratio, which is a key metric in evaluating the effectiveness of energy efficiency programs.
9 OVERALL SAVINGS FOR CUSTOM Table 16 below compares the total tracked and evaluated savings for Custom, which includes savings from Retrofit, New Construction and Building Optimization.
AI summary Table 16 compares total tracked and evaluated savings for Custom, including Retrofit, New Construction, and Building Optimization.
11.1 Description EMIS offers incentives in the form of rebates or zero-percent on-bill financing to help facilities reduce their electricity consumption through the implementation of an energy management information system. First introduce...
AI summary EMIS provides rebates and zero-percent on-bill financing to help industrial businesses and institutions reduce electricity consumption through energy management information systems. The program, which became a stand-alone component of the Custom Incentives program in 2015, includes audits, implementation plans, and technical support. In 2018, EMIS aimed for 0.90 GWh in net electricity savings and 0.2 MW in net peak demand savings.
11.3 Participation History Two participants took part in EMIS in 2018; one was a continuing participant that began with EMIS in 2014 and the other was a new participant that reported savings through a special EMIS project. The special proj...
AI summary In 2018, participation in the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) decreased compared to previous years, with only two participants. One was a continuing participant since 2014, and the other was a new participant involved in a special project using a building automation system. Despite fewer participants, gross energy savings remained similar to 2017 due to data from a 2017 participant becoming available in 2018. However, incremental peak demand savings were significantly lower, partly due to overestimated 2017 savings.
Satisfaction with EMIS Overall satisfaction with EMIS was high among participants, who provided an average rating of 8.0 on a 10-point scale (where 1 indicates "not at all satisfied" and 10 "completely satisfied"). One participant was most...
AI summary Participants expressed high satisfaction with EMIS, rating it 8.0 on a 10-point scale. One participant highlighted energy savings and cost savings, while another noted that the service provider had more experience in the industrial sector than the institutional sector.
Challenges and Barriers When questioned on challenges and barriers encountered, one participant mentioned difficulty with allocating enough time to really "dig in" to the energy manager role since it was not his primary job. The other part...
AI summary Participants discussed challenges related to time constraints in fulfilling energy manager roles and difficulties in managing significant capital investments with systems that are only partially operational. They also noted the need for more support in analyzing savings reports.
14.1 Impact Definitions Table 18 below defines certain terms to allow the reader to better understand the vocabulary and concepts used in the EMIS Impact Evaluation section of this report. SEM and EMIS vocabulary being the same, the defini...
AI summary This section defines key terms used in the EMIS Impact Evaluation, ensuring clarity in understanding the vocabulary and concepts related to both SEM and EMIS program components.
Continuing Participant For the continuing participant, a documentation review was conducted with information provided by ENS in November, which included a monthly savings report from the service provider and a preliminary tracking sheet pr...
AI summary The continuing participant's energy savings were reviewed using documentation from ENS and the EMIS service provider. The evaluation confirmed accurate tracking of incremental and cumulative savings, with a non-routine adjustment made for equipment changes. The 2018 cumulative savings were established at 3,210,515 kWh.
New Participant This EMIS participant is the first one to implement an energy management system in an institutional facility, whereas other participants (including past participants), were exclusively in the medium to large industrial manu...
AI summary A new EMIS participant implemented a BAS system across multiple campuses instead of using the standard EMIS process due to the complexity of creating individual regression models. Savings documentation was prepared by the participant's energy manager, and adjustments were made to the calculation methodology. The project resulted in energy and demand savings of 19.6 kW in 2018.
14.2.3 Effective Useful Life As discussed in the 2017 Evaluation Report, the Evaluator decided to estimate savings conservatively by not claiming additional incremental savings as a result of avoided decay. However, persisting savings and...
AI summary This section discusses the calculation of Effective Useful Life (EUL) for energy savings in the EMIS program. It considers the remaining time in the program component and a conservative decay rate of 50% after participation ends. The EUL is calculated for each participant based on their participation timeline and the assumption that savings persist for a certain period after withdrawal.
Table 19: EMIS Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings 2018 Proje ects 2017 Ongoing Project New Project Subtotal for 2018 Projects Projects Total Number of Projects 1 1 2 1 3 Energy Savings Tracked Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter...
AI summary Table 19 presents the EMIS Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for 2018 and 2017, including tracked savings, adjustment ratios, and line loss factors. The table includes data on ongoing and new projects, energy savings at the meter and generator, and peak demand savings. A note indicates that some 2017 savings were evaluated in 2018 due to delayed data availability.
14.4 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to EMIS. Since spillover and free-ridership effects were considered to be nil, the net program component impacts are equal to the gros...
AI summary Net savings from the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) are calculated as 1.616 GWh of electrical energy and 0.051 MW of peak demand, resulting in 990 tonnes of avoided CO2 eq annually. The calculation uses a Nova Scotia-specific factor derived from 2017 data from Nova Scotia Power and Emera Inc.
Table 20: Comparison of EMIS Total Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.637 GWh 1.637 GWh 1.00 1.637 GWh Evaluation Results 1.637...
AI summary Table 20 compares energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENS and evaluated results. Evaluated energy savings were 1% lower than tracked savings due to minor changes in calculation by the Evaluator. The 2017 project's savings were also incorrectly tracked by ENS, leading to slightly lower savings.
15.1 Description SEM was launched in 2014 as a pilot to provide industrial and institutional participants with funding and support to implement energy management practices within their organizations. The program component became a part of...
AI summary SEM, launched in 2014, supports industrial and institutional participants in implementing energy management practices. It provides tools, training, and audits to achieve energy savings and improve long-term performance. Participants must commit to 12 months of involvement, with an option for a second year. SEM aimed for 0.7 GWh in electrical savings and 0.1 MW in peak demand savings in 2018.
15.2 Follow-up on 2016 Evaluation Report Recommendations SEM was evaluated in 2016 and improvement recommendations were made by the Evaluator. Table 21 below provides a brief summary of the implementation status of each recommendation pres...
AI summary The 2016 Evaluation Report on SEM provided recommendations for improvement, and Table 21 summarizes the implementation status of these recommendations. Energy Kaizens focus on reducing waste and improving energy consumption, while an SEM project involves implementing a strategic energy management system in a facility.
Table 21: Implementation Status of the 2016 Recommendations for SEM 2016 Recommendations Status 2016 SEM-R1. Continue to support SEM and identify potential new participants. Implemented 2016 SEM-R2. Continue encouraging SEM participants to...
AI summary Table 21 outlines the implementation status of the 2016 recommendations for the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program. Five of the seven recommendations were implemented, with details on how ENS addressed each, including new participant enrollment, EMIS integration, and tracking incremental savings.
15.3 Participation History Although two projects were launched in fall 2017, these projects started generating savings only in January 2018 and were therefore included in the 2018 evaluation. Two other projects generated savings in 2018 af...
AI summary The document discusses the participation history in the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program from 2015 to 2018, noting the number of active participants and savings generated. In 2018, four projects started generating savings, with participation levels higher than 2017 but lower than 2015 and 2016. Savings per participant in 2018 were similar to 2015 due to new participants in both years.
16 SEM EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the SEM evaluation are as follows: - › Reporting on participant perspectives - › Calculating program results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, pea...
AI summary The SEM evaluation aims to report on participant perspectives and calculate program results, including energy savings and GHG emissions. The methodology includes reviewing SEM documentation, meeting with the program manager, and collecting data to assess program effectiveness.
17 SEM MARKET EVALUATION This section describes participant perspectives on SEM. As part of the SEM on-site visits, the four participants were asked questions regarding satisfaction with SEM, any barriers they encountered, and improvement...
AI summary This section outlines participant perspectives on SEM, including their satisfaction, barriers encountered, and suggestions for improvement, based on on-site visits with four participants.
Recommendations Three participants made suggestions on how to improve SEM. One participant suggested reducing the number of in-person visits since they were somewhat dissatisfied by the number of visits conducted by ENS and the Evaluator....
AI summary Three participants provided feedback on improving the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program. One suggested reducing in-person visits due to dissatisfaction with the frequency, while others requested more visits and assistance in identifying priority energy measures.
18 SEM IMPACT EVALUATION The objective of the 2018 impact evaluation of SEM projects is to determine their gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings. The various terms related to the SEM impact evaluation are defined in the E...
AI summary The 2018 impact evaluation of SEM projects aims to assess their gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, with definitions provided in the EMIS section of the report.
ted during peak hours, the Evaluator considered that average demands savings represent a conservative estimate of the peak demand savings. Shortly before implementing SEM, one participant replaced linear lamps purchased through BER Instant...
AI summary The Evaluator adjusted savings calculations for a lighting retrofit project, recognizing a significant discrepancy between estimated and actual savings. Savings from early fixture replacements were included in SEM gross savings, but an adjustment was made using the BER Instant Rebates NTGR due to the inappropriateness of SEM's NTGR for these savings.
18.1.2 Interactive Effects The savings associated with SEM are established based on the results of metering the electrical consumption of an entire building for all the buildings evaluated. The on-site visits and analysis of the project do...
AI summary The savings from Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) are based on full building electrical consumption metering, which already accounts for interactive effects. On-site visits and documentation analysis confirmed that all systems were included in the measurement, so no additional interactive effects were applied.
18.1.3 Effective Useful Life To establish the EUL of SEM, the Evaluator conducted a literature review and also questioned participants about savings persistency. The literature review revealed that there is no consensus on SEM savings pers...
AI summary The Evaluator assessed the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) by reviewing literature and surveying participants. The literature review found no consensus on SEM savings persistency, and participant responses indicated varying levels of confidence in maintaining energy consumption tracking without support from Energy Nova Scotia (ENS).
18.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to SEM. Since one project had some savings reported through SEM that resulted from participation in BER Instant Rebates, the Evaluator...
AI summary Net savings from the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program are calculated after adjusting for savings attributed to BER Instant Rebates, using a Non-Technology Grant Rate (NTGR) of 0.63. The adjusted energy savings amount to 88,701 Whk, with peak demand savings proportionally deducted. Total net savings are 1.455 GWh and 0.190 MW.
Table 23: SEM Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings Annual Savings Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 1.471 Special Deduction (GWh) -0.089 Net Energy Savings – at the Meter (GWh) 1.382 Line Loss Factor...
AI summary Table 23 presents the revised gross energy and peak demand savings from the Sustainable Energy Management (SEM) program. It includes metrics such as energy savings at the meter and generator, line loss factors, effective useful life, and peak demand savings, providing an overview of the program's impact on energy efficiency.
Table 24: Comparison of SEM Total Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 1.681 GWh 1.681 GWh 1.00 1.681 GWh Evaluation Results 1.681 G...
AI summary The table compares energy and peak demand savings tracked by ENS and evaluated results. Evaluated gross energy savings were 8% lower than tracked due to incorrect tracking of savings from capital projects and adjustments made by the Evaluator after the tracking sheet was submitted. Net savings were 13% below tracked savings.
19 EMIS AND SEM RECOMMENDATIONS Both EMIS and SEM achieved their savings targets in 2018 and participation satisfaction remained high. EMIS saw additional incremental savings being achieved in the continuing participant's fourth year of pa...
AI summary EMIS and SEM achieved their savings targets in 2018 with high participant satisfaction. However, participants rely heavily on service providers for energy performance tracking, which limits their ability to sustain efforts independently. Recommendations focus on improving participant understanding and mastery of energy performance tracking to increase savings persistence and satisfaction.
Table 25: 2018 Overall Participation and Savings for Custom Incentives Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Custom Energy Savings 14.315 GWh 0.81 11.603 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 69 projects completed 196.661 GWh 0.79 156.1...
AI summary Table 25 provides data on the 2018 participation levels and savings from custom incentives, including energy savings, lifetime energy savings, and peak demand savings across various programs such as EMIS and SEM. The data includes gross and net savings, as well as the NTGR factor applied.
Custom Custom is comprised of the Retrofit, New Construction and Building Optimization services. Altogether, these services generated 11.603 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.200 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2...
AI summary The Custom program, including Retrofit, New Construction, and Building Optimization services, achieved significant energy and peak demand savings in 2018. However, the Evaluator noted issues with documentation accuracy and free-ridership, particularly in New Construction, and recommended improvements in communication and process clarity.
Energy Management Information System Two participants generated savings under EMIS in 2018; one was a continuing participant that began with EMIS in 2015 and the other was a new participant that reported savings through a special EMIS proj...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) showed 1.616 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.051 MW in net peak demand savings. While documentation was strong for the continuing participant, the new participant required minor adjustments to their savings calculations. Participants reported high satisfaction with EMIS but faced challenges in understanding the system and analyzing large data sets.
Strategic Energy Management Four participants generated savings in 2018, and all were new participants. The Evaluator determined that SEM achieved 1.455 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.190 MW in net peak demand savings at the ge...
AI summary In 2018, four new participants in the Strategic Energy Management (SEM) program achieved significant energy and peak demand savings. The Evaluator found that while the service provider's reporting was of high quality, ENS made errors in tracking savings, particularly omitting deductions from capital projects. Peak demand savings were also not tracked by ENS or the service provider, leading to an upward adjustment in reported savings. Participant confidence in continuing SEM without support from a SP was low to medium.
Custom Appendix I Custom: Retrofit On-site Visit Protocol Appendix II Custom: New Construction Project Review Protocol Appendix III Custom: Building Optimization On-site Visit Protocol Appendix IV Custom: New Construction Service Provider...
AI summary The document outlines various custom protocols and algorithms related to energy efficiency programs, including on-site visit procedures, project review processes, and calculation methods for free-ridership and participant spillover effects.
7. M&V Post Implementation Results Were any baseline measurements taken (Y/N) Are electrical savings based on measurements? (Y/N) Are demand savings based on measurements? (Y/N) IF so summarize measurement plan, and measurement ty pe. Repo...
AI summary The text presents a table related to post-implementation monitoring and verification (M&V) results, including questions about baseline measurements, electrical and demand savings, measurement plans, on-site visits, seasonal load profiles, and predicted results. It is a form for reporting M&V data.
. Energy and Demand Savings Adjustments Energy Savings from Tracking Sheet: kWh/yr Project Estimated Liergy Savings from Hacking Sheet. kW Finish Month: Demand Savings from Tracking Sheet: KVV Notes on Project Peak Coincidence Factor Used...
AI summary The text includes tables and forms related to energy and demand savings adjustments, including fields for tracking energy and demand savings, peak coincidence factors, and project status. The content appears to be part of a regulatory process for evaluating energy savings and associated adjustments.
FR2a. If the program support or financial incentive had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have implemented exactly the same energy efficiency measures that you implemented through the program? Response 98 Don't Know 9...
AI summary The document includes responses to questions about the likelihood of implementing energy efficiency measures without program support, with most respondents indicating they do not know or refusing to answer. The questions focus on the impact of financial incentives from Efficiency Nova Scotia.
FR4. Next, I'm going to ask you to rate the importance of factors that might have influenced your decision to implement the energy efficiency measures you implemented through the Custom program. Using a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means "N...
AI summary The speaker is asking the respondent to rate the importance of factors that influenced their decision to implement energy efficiency measures through the Custom program, using a scale from 0 to 10.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The program financial incentives Response 97 N/A 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. The recommendations and technical assistance provided by the Business Development Manager or other ENS staff in selecting...
AI summary The text presents a table with factors related to energy efficiency programs and responses, including questions about financial incentives, technical assistance, and decision-making criteria such as payback period thresholds. The responses are categorized as N/A, Don't Know, or Refused.
Cross-influence - FR7. Before participating in the Custom program, had you already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [SKIP TO FR9] - 98. (Don't know) [SKIP TO FR9] - 99. (Refused) [SKIP TO...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to participant engagement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs, focusing on whether prior participation or exposure to promotional materials influenced their decision to implement energy efficiency measures.
Spillover - SO1. Since the time that you participated in the Custom Retrofit program, have you implemented some additional energy efficiency measures other than those implemented through the program? - 1. Yes [CONTINUE] - 2. No [THANK AND...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to energy efficiency measures implemented by participants in the Custom Retrofit program, including whether additional measures were taken, financing or rebate requests, and detailed descriptions of the measures, their locations, and estimated savings.
influential to your decision to implement energy efficiency measures." SO4. Did your experience with the energy efficiency measures implemented through the Custom program influence your decision to implement these additional energy efficie...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to customer experiences with energy efficiency programs, specifically asking about the influence of the Custom program on their decisions to implement additional energy efficiency measures and reasons for not using Efficiency Nova Scotia programs for a project.
Project Review Protocol The Evaluator modified the 2017 New Construction on-site visit and simulation review protocols for the 2018 evaluation. The protocols were merged into a single protocol that was used to prepare the on-site visits, c...
AI summary The Evaluator updated the 2017 New Construction on-site visit and simulation review protocols for 2018, merging them into a single document. The protocol includes key findings, energy savings adjustments, and details on building characteristics and efficiency measures. Site visits and follow-up calls were used to gather information and assess market evaluation and free-ridership.
Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report
AI summary This document is an appendix report from the 2018 DSM Evaluation, focusing on the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia. It provides an analysis and assessment of the program's performance and outcomes.
Energy and Demand Savings A Adjustments 11300.6 Energy Savings from Tracking She et: kWh/yr Project Estimated Finish Month: Damand Cavings from Tracking Cha -4. kW Demand Savings from Tracking She et: Notes on Project Diversity Factor Used...
AI summary The document contains a table outlining energy and demand savings adjustments, including energy savings from tracking sheets, demand savings, diversity factors, and adjustments made to energy and demand savings. It also includes notes on project status and evaluated savings.
Non-prescriptiv e lighting measur es (Lighting measures incented through New Constructio n) Measure 1: Name Description from documentation On-site visit As modeled by participant Changes to model by Econoler Location Туре Fixture Quantity...
AI summary The document contains a table with lighting and building envelope measures, including descriptions, on-site visits, modeling by participants, and changes to the model by Econoler. It outlines various measures, their locations, types, quantities, wattage, schedules, and comments.
NC Free Ridership Questions - B1a. Does your company have a corporate policy with respect to new building energy efficiency? If so, please describe the policy. - B1b. At which point in your design and construction process did you first dis...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document outlines a series of questions aimed at assessing the impact of energy efficiency programs on new construction. The questions focus on corporate policies, decision-making processes, and the influence of financial incentives and technical assistance on the implementation of energy efficiency measures.
Fill the table below for each heating system at the site, as applicable. Description Heating System 1 Heating System 2 Heating System 3 Heating System 4 Energy Source Heating System Type Nominal Capacity Efficiency or COP Percent of Load (...
AI summary The text provides a table template to be filled out for each heating system at a site, including details such as energy source, system type, capacity, efficiency, load percentage, and changes in building set points. It also mentions a section for cooling systems.
Fill the table below for each cooling system at the site, as applicable Description Cooling System 1 Cooling System 2 Cooling System 3 Cooling System 4 Energy Source Cooling System Type Nominal Capacity SEER or COP Percent of Load (Declara...
AI summary The document provides a table template for filling in details about cooling systems at a site, including energy sources, system types, capacities, efficiency metrics, load percentages, and changes in building set points. The table is to be completed for up to four cooling systems.
5. On-Site Observations and Findings Report the on-site visit and indicate the key observations and findings made on site. 6. Questionnaires Market Information Questionnaire Completed? (Y/N) Free Ridership Questionnaire Completed? (Y/N) 7...
AI summary The document contains tables related to on-site observations, questionnaires, and measurement and verification (M&V) results. It includes sections for reporting findings, completing questionnaires, and summarizing energy savings and load profiles. The content appears to be part of a regulatory process involving energy efficiency and demand-side management.
8. Interactive Effects Interactive Effects? YES NO the fill in the the heating syste table below for m at the site Briefly describe interactive effects for the ne project. 9. Revised Energy and Peak Den For each energy efficiency measure,...
AI summary The text contains a partially filled table related to energy efficiency measures, interactive effects, and adjustments to energy and demand savings. It includes sections for describing interactive effects, energy and peak demand savings, and adjustments made by evaluators. The table also references factors such as diversity and line loss, and includes placeholders for energy savings calculations.
Table 1: Overview of Data Collection Activity Descriptor This Instrument Instrument Type In-depth interview Estimated Time to Complete 30 minutes Count Up to 10 Population Description New Commercial Construction Service Providers (Architec...
AI summary The document outlines two tables related to data collection activities. Table 1 describes an in-depth interview instrument targeting new commercial construction service providers, while Table 2 lists research objectives and associated questions aimed at understanding barriers, successes, and engagement with the Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) program.
[MULTIPLE RESPONSE] - 1. Small Offices [ <25,000 square feet: typically with small footprint, and/or 1-3 stories ] - 2. Large Offices [ ≥25,000 square feet: typically a large footprint and/or > 3 stories such as a city block or office park...
AI summary The text categorizes building types into 15 distinct classes based on size, use, and characteristics, providing examples for each category. These classifications are likely used for energy efficiency programs or regulatory purposes.
[ Do not read: ] - 98. Don't know - 99. Refused [ASK ALL] Q15. Are you a member of the ENS Efficiency Trade Network (ETN)? Why or why not? [ASK ALL] Q16. What, if any, professional associations or groups should ENS be reaching out to to in...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at participants regarding their involvement with ENS's Efficiency Trade Network, potential professional associations to engage with for program participation, and additional training or certifications related to energy management and efficient design.
Motivation's to Participate [ASK ALL] Q18. What do you think motivates building owners to invest in energy efficiency? [ If needed: Is it demand from potential tenants, long term energy savings, etc . EE is defined as designing buildings t...
AI summary The text presents a series of questions aimed at understanding the motivations and barriers that influence building owners' participation in energy efficiency initiatives, particularly the New Commercial Construction program. It explores factors such as tenant demand, long-term savings, and program incentives.
Successes, challenges, and opportunities To wrap-up I have a few general questions about the program related to program's successes, challenges, and opportunities. [ASK ALL] Q29. What do you see as a key success of the New Commercial Const...
AI summary The document presents a series of questions aimed at evaluating the New Commercial Construction program's successes, challenges, and opportunities from the perspective of companies and their clients. The focus is on gathering insights regarding the program's impact and areas for improvement.
APPENDIX V CUSTOM: RETROFIT CALCULATION EXAMPLE This appendix provides a sample of the calculations used to adjust the energy savings results for one of the projects reviewed as part of the 2018 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation. The calcu...
AI summary This appendix provides an example of how energy savings results were adjusted for a lobster pound refrigeration system upgrade project as part of the 2018 Custom Retrofit impact evaluation. Calculations are based on on-site data and documentation provided by ENS.
Savings Equations This project involved replacing seven old refrigeration condensers with three new efficient compressors and upgrading three older pumps with one new efficient pump. Documenting the energy savings calculations consisted of...
AI summary The project involved replacing old refrigeration condensers and pumps with more efficient models. Energy savings were calculated using an Excel workbook with two tables, applying the standard three-phase power formula to compute power demand and energy consumption for both basecase and proposed case scenarios.
Where: - V is the voltage in volts - A is the amperage in amps - PF is the power factor $$ENERGY\left(\frac{kWh}{vear}\right) = Power Qty Annual Runtime Duty Cycle$$ The reported energy and demand savings were determined as the difference...
AI summary The text provides a formula for calculating energy consumption in kilowatt-hours per year, using voltage, amperage, and power factor. It also mentions that energy and demand savings are calculated as the difference between the basecase and proposed case.
Tracked Savings Calculation ENS used the equations mentioned above to calculate the power demand and energy consumption for each refrigeration condensing unit and pump, as presented in Figure 1. The voltage was obtained from the nameplate...
AI summary ENS calculated tracked savings using equations for refrigeration condensing units and pumps, relying on voltage, power factor, amperage, and duty cycle. The Evaluator noted inconsistency in the number of operation days between pumps and refrigeration units, with no justification provided in the project documentation.
Figure 1: Tracked Savings Values Total 205,468 48.50 I kWh/year kW Revised Savings Calculation
AI summary Figure 1 presents tracked savings values, including total energy savings in kWh/year and kW. The document also mentions a revised savings calculation, indicating a focus on energy efficiency metrics and their evaluation.
Adjustments to energy savings were made based on data found by the Evaluator during the on-site visits. Although the initial calculations indicated that the original three pumps were being replaced with a single pump, the Evaluator documen...
AI summary The Evaluator made adjustments to energy savings calculations based on on-site findings, including the discovery of three newly installed pumps and discrepancies in condenser readings. These changes affected the amperage values and recalculated energy and demand savings for the project.
MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a; FR3) PA1 Score: FR1b. Before participating in Custom Retrofit, had your organization decided to implement the specific energy efficiency measures that were implemented through Custom Retrofit? IF 1. Yes: Use FR1c IF 2...
AI summary This section asks respondents whether they had already decided on specific energy efficiency measures before participating in the Custom Retrofit program. If they had, they are to indicate 100% in FR1c; otherwise, 0%.
(10 − FR4) × 10% FR2c. If the program support or financial incentive had not been offered, what is the likelihood that you would have postponed the implementation of the energy efficiency measures by at least one year ? (Scale 0 to 10) FR2...
AI summary The text presents a question regarding the likelihood of postponing energy efficiency measures by at least one year if program support or financial incentives were not offered, using a scale from 0 to 10. The calculation for FR2c is provided as (10 – Answer) × 10%, with specific instructions for handling 'DK' or 'REF' responses.
APPENDIX VII CUSTOM: RETROFIT ALGORITHM FOR PARTICIPANT SPILLOVER CALCULATION SO1. Since the time that you participated in Custom Retrofit, have you implemented some additional energy efficiency measures other than those implemented throug...
AI summary This appendix outlines a retrofit algorithm to calculate participant spillover from the Custom Retrofit program. It asks participants if they implemented additional energy efficiency measures after the program and whether they received or planned to request financing or rebates from ENS for those measures.
Additional Upgrade Savings: SO3 SO4. Did your experience with the energy efficiency measures implemented through Custom Retrofit influence your decision to implement these additional energy efficiency measures on your own? (Scale 0 to 10)...
AI summary The document asks about the influence of energy efficiency measures from the Custom Retrofit program on the decision to implement additional measures, using a scale from 0 to 10. The response is calculated as the answer multiplied by 10%.
1 Improve communication to SPs and participants about the various New Construction steps and corresponding service requirements. As previously mentioned, the key aspect of New Construction mentioned as problematic by participants and SPs i...
AI summary The document highlights the need to improve communication with Service Providers (SPs) and participants regarding New Construction steps and service requirements. It notes that unclear communication and lack of understanding of the basecase for efficient designs are problematic. The Evaluator recommends clearer information, process charts, checklists, and personalized follow-ups. Additionally, there is a need to engage more professionals, such as modellers, architects, and contractors, to strengthen advocacy for New Construction.
Project Review Protocol and Participant Interview Guide The Evaluator relied on the same on-site visit protocol as used in Custom Retrofit with only minor adjustments. The Evaluator decided to use that protocol since the new project was no...
AI summary The Evaluator used a modified on-site visit protocol from the Custom Retrofit project to assess a new project requiring a more comprehensive approach. The protocol included reviewing project documentation, gathering data during the visit, and completing sections on interactive effects, energy and demand savings, and final savings values. The protocol also included questions about participant satisfaction and barriers to EMIS participation.
Fill the table below for each cooling system at the site. Description Cooling System 1 Cooling System 2 Cooling System 3 Cooling System 4 Energy Source Cooling System Type Nominal Capacity SEER or COP Percent of Load (Declaration) If any,...
AI summary The document provides a table to be filled for each cooling system at a site, including details such as energy source, system type, capacity, and efficiency metrics. It also includes a section for a pre-visit assessment of the project, though it is currently empty.
6. On-Site Observations and Findings Report the on-site visit and indicate the key observations and findings made on site. 7. M&V Post Implementation Results Were any baseline measurements taken ? (Y/N) Are electrical savings based on meas...
AI summary The document contains a table outlining on-site observations and findings, as well as monitoring and verification (M&V) post-implementation results. It includes fields for baseline measurements, electrical and demand savings, measurement plans, seasonal load profiles, and predicted results. However, most fields are empty or not filled out.
10. Explain Project Adjustments between PDA and project completion If any modification were made between PDA and project completion, describe and provide calculations 11. Summarize Project Adjustments and Final Savings Values IF any adjust...
AI summary The text outlines two sections of a regulatory proceeding document: one asking for explanations of project adjustments between the Preliminary Design Assessment (PDA) and project completion, and another requesting a summary of project adjustments and final savings values. It also includes a section about satisfaction questionnaires.
APPENDIX XI EMIS: PROJECT REVIEW PROTOCOL AND INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH CONTINUING PARTICIPANT The 2018 EMIS impact evaluation involved conducting one project review and one phone interview with a continuing participant from 2017 in order to co...
AI summary This appendix describes the project review protocol and interview guide used in the 2018 EMIS impact evaluation. It involved a project review and a phone interview with a continuing participant from 2017 to gather information on program changes and participant satisfaction.
P1. First of all, I would like to validate that my list of energy conservation measures implemented at your facility is complete. easure, could yo hing that I didn't u please confirm its beginn ing and end date, and if it is still ongoing?...
AI summary The document seeks validation of a list of energy conservation measures implemented at a facility, including their dates and ongoing status, and asks about variations in energy savings over time and the usefulness of the EMIS system in maintaining these measures.
P5. Now thinking specifically abo out the support given by the serv vice provider a) Can you describe how the in previous years? e service provider was helpful in maintaining the energy conserva ation measures put in place , . 0 where 1 is...
AI summary The text includes a table with questions regarding the effectiveness of service providers in maintaining energy conservation measures and interactive effects on energy consumption. It asks for ratings on a scale from 1 to 10 and includes notes on seasonal and production variables impacting energy use.
11. Energy and Demand Savings Adjustn nents Notes from this year: Energy Savings from Tracking Sheet: kWh/yr Project Estimated Finish Month: Demand Savings from Tracking Sheet: kW Notes on Project Diversity Factor Used by ENSC: _ Status: A...
AI summary The text outlines a table for tracking energy and demand savings adjustments, including metrics like kWh/yr, kW, and diversity factors used by ENSC and Econoler. It includes fields for project status, evaluator adjustments, and final project impacts at the meter. The section also requests a summary of project adjustments and notes from this year, focusing on both peak demand and energy savings.
On-site Visit Protocol For the 2018 SEM impact evaluation, the Evaluator reviewed the interview protocol used in 2016 and improved the statistical analysis questions of the protocol used to validate the accuracy of the regression model. Qu...
AI summary The 2018 SEM impact evaluation involved refining the interview protocol from 2016, adding questions on satisfaction, barriers, and savings persistency. Four on-site visits were conducted based on ENS digital project files, including M&V reports and SEM planning tools. The Evaluator reviewed baseline energy regression and other components of the protocol.
This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 EMIS and SEM evaluations, as well as all 2017 evaluation recommendations that were not fully implemented. Sections Recommendations Executive Summary...
AI summary The appendix highlights the Evaluator's recommendations to improve EMIS and SEM program delivery by enhancing participant understanding and mastery of energy performance tracking. Participants rely heavily on service providers, and without continued support, they may discontinue efforts. The recommendations aim to increase persistence of savings and improve participant satisfaction.
ABBREVIATIONS BNI Business, non-profit and institutional CRA Corporate Research Associates DIY Do-it-yourself DSM Demand-side management ENS Efficiency Nova Scotia EUL Effective useful life GHG Greenhouse gas HOU Hours of use HVAC Heating,...
AI summary This section of the document provides a list of abbreviations and their corresponding full forms, including terms related to energy efficiency, business, and regulatory processes. It includes acronyms such as ENS, DSM, and NSP, which are relevant to the proceeding.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) evaluation of the Direct Installation program comprised of one program component, namely Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES). SBES offers Nova S...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation of the SBES program, part of the Direct Installation program, assessed participation levels, gross savings, and net savings for both the audit and DIY paths. The Evaluator conducted interviews and on-site visits to evaluate the program's effectiveness.
Table 1: SBES Overall Participation and Savings in 2018 Participation Level Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Audit Path Energy Savings 0.912 GWh 0.95 0.868 GWh Lifetime Energy Savings 281 13.903 GWh 0.95 13.272 GWh Peak Demand Savings 0.204...
AI summary Table 1 presents the participation levels and savings from the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program in 2018, including both audit and DIY paths, with metrics such as gross and net energy savings, peak demand savings, and NTGR factors.
Small Business Energy Solutions SBES offers incentives and resources to Nova Scotia small businesses to encourage them to make smart energy efficient upgrades in their facilities. To be eligible, businesses must annually consume less than...
AI summary SBES provides incentives for Nova Scotia small businesses with annual electricity consumption under 350,000 kWh. Eligibility is determined using electricity consumption data from NSP or municipal utilities. In 2018, ENS updated application forms and four participants completed projects under the AMH pilot, which targets affordable housing.
SBES Performance SBES aimed to achieve 9.6 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.7 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that SBES achieved 9.589 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.44...
AI summary SBES achieved 9.589 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 1.441 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, contributing to 5,874 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided greenhouse gas emissions. A total of 529 projects were completed, a 30% increase from 2017, including four projects from the AMH pilot.
SBES Market Evaluation Highlights The Evaluator asked questions during the site visits to better understand participant processes for initiating equipment purchases or installations, the types of market actors they are most likely to rely...
AI summary The SBES Market Evaluation highlights high interest in energy-efficient HVAC equipment among small businesses. Participants rely on HVAC contractors for equipment upgrades and may benefit from their engagement as ambassadors for energy efficiency. Support from ENS is recognized and likely to be utilized in the future.
SBES Energy Savings The Evaluator reviewed ENS gross savings estimates using the information contained in the tracking sheet, the CIRx Screening Tool, and findings from the on-site visits. Overall, this review found continued improvement i...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed ENS gross savings estimates for SBES Energy Savings, noting improvements in DIY project accuracy but significant adjustments due to inaccuracies in tracked HOUs and peak coincidence factors. Audit path savings were also adjusted due to various issues, leading to an overall adjustment ratio of 0.811. Free-ridership values from 2017 were reapplied in 2018, and spillover was found to be nil. Net energy and peak demand savings in 2018 were 9.589 GWh and 1.441 MW respectively.
Table 2: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for SBES Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 11.852 GWh 11.852 GWh 0.82 9.673 GWh Evaluation Results 11...
AI summary Table 2 compares tracked and evaluated savings for the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program. Evaluated net energy savings are about 1% lower than tracked values, with tracked gross savings adjusted downward by 8%. The tracked net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) is significantly lower than the 2017 NTGR, leading to an underestimate of tracked net energy savings.
Table 3: Types of Evaluations Conducted for Each Program Component 2017 2018 Program Program Component Process Market Impact Process Market Impact Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement R C C Product Rebates Program Instant Savings R R...
AI summary Table 3 outlines the types of evaluations conducted for each program component in the residential and business energy efficiency programs. It includes process and impact evaluations for components such as appliance retirement, home energy assessments, and energy management information systems.
Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot Launched in 2016, the Affordable Multifamily Housing (AMH) pilot provides affordable-housing owners with incentives for building-wide energy retrofit projects with the intent of reducing electrical ener...
AI summary The Affordable Multifamily Housing (AMH) pilot, launched in 2016, provides incentives for energy retrofit projects in affordable housing to reduce electrical energy consumption. It uses a delivery model similar to SBES and re-engaged participants in 2018, leading to four completed projects with potential for more in 2019.
2 SBES EVALUATION OBJECTIVE AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the SBES evaluation are as follows: - › Collecting information during site visits on non-lighting measures that participants are most interested in upgrading - › Calculatin...
AI summary The SBES evaluation aims to collect information on non-lighting measures participants are interested in upgrading and to calculate program results such as energy savings and GHG emissions. The methodology includes reviewing program documentation, meeting with the program manager, and using a sample-based approach with a 10% margin of error at a 90% confidence level.
Project Reviews and On-site Visits In October and November 2018, a technical review of the project documentation and on-site visits were carried out by Equilibrium Engineering for a sample of projects. The sampling methodology and the prot...
AI summary In 2018, Equilibrium Engineering conducted technical reviews and on-site visits for 50 SBES projects to validate energy efficiency measures and assess spillover effects. The reviews focused on verifying project data, equipment details, and participant interest in additional upgrades.
3 SBES MARKET EVALUATION The Evaluator asked questions during the site visits to better understand participant processes for initiating equipment purchases or installations, the types of market actors they are most likely to rely on for su...
AI summary The Evaluator surveyed 47 participants to understand their interest in upgrading equipment and the processes they use. Most were not interested in upgrades in the next two years, but those who were focused on HVAC, solar, and lighting. Many rely on ENS and regular contractors for support, highlighting opportunities for engagement to increase SBES participation.
4.1 Gross Savings Gross savings correspond to the change in energy consumption resulting from actions taken by participants, regardless of their reasons for participating.4 For each SBES project, ENS tracks gross savings using the standard...
AI summary The section discusses gross savings in the SBES program, focusing on the evaluation of energy consumption changes from implemented measures. Lighting measures account for most savings, and the evaluation methodology involved on-site visits to assess accuracy. Issues with data tracking and performance variables were identified, particularly in HVAC projects.
4.1.1 Summary of Adjustments to Gross Savings – Audit Path The on-site visits revealed common and significant errors in tracked values recorded by SBEAs. The issues with tracked savings in the sampled audit path projects were not specific...
AI summary On-site visits identified significant errors in tracked savings values recorded by SBEAs. Discrepancies were found between tracked and revised values for HVAC and lighting measures, leading to a one-time adjustment applied to audit path gross savings without extrapolation.
Table 6: Gross Savings Adjustments – DIY Path Population Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Total Sample Overall Margin of Adjustment Ratio Error Overall Adjustment Ratio Margin of Error 501 40 0.929 4.1% 0.620 5.3% 5 AMH pilot projects we...
AI summary Table 6 presents gross savings adjustments for the DIY path, including energy savings and peak demand savings with their respective margin of error percentages. The table includes a total population and sample size, along with adjustment ratios and error margins. Note 5 indicates that AMH pilot projects were excluded from the audit path on-site visits.
4.1.3 Interactive Effects When a measure implemented as part of SBES is affected by interactive effects, this is taken into account by the gross savings standard equation in the ENS CIRx Screening Tool.6 Since 2016, specific interactive ef...
AI summary The ENS CIRx Screening Tool accounts for interactive effects in SBES measures through a gross savings standard equation. Since 2016, interactive effects factors have been applied to energy and peak demand savings, with methodology updated in 2017 and maintained in 2018.
Table 7: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for SBES – Audit Path Ca f Me te g or y o as ur e Cu to s m H V A C K i he tc n La dr un y L ig h in t g Re fr ig io t er a n A M H P i lo t To l fo A l l ta r Ca ies te g or En Sa in e...
AI summary Table 7 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for the Smart Building Energy Savings (SBES) program under the Audit Path. The table includes various categories such as Energy Nova Scotia (ENS), Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning (HVAC), and others, with numerical values indicating energy savings and adjustments.
Table 8: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings for SBES – DIY Path Ca f Me te g or y o as ur e Ag ic l tu r u re H V A C K i he tc n L ig h in t g M V S D Re fr ig io t er a n So la r To l ta En Sa in er g y v g s Tr ke d G En Sa in...
AI summary Table 8 presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings for the Smart Building Energy Savings (SBES) DIY Path, including data across various sectors such as agriculture, HVAC, and lighting. The table includes metrics like tracked gross energy savings and adjusted ratio energy savings.
4.2.2 Participant Spillover For SBES, participant spillover occurs when participants implement eligible energy efficiency measures due to the influence of previously participating in the program component without having received any kind o...
AI summary The document discusses participant spillover in the SBES program, where participants implement energy efficiency measures influenced by previous participation without additional support. In 2018, negligible spillover was observed, with only two measures identified among 50 surveyed participants, resulting in less than 0.1% spillover and a nil spillover level applied to net savings calculations.
4.3 Net Savings Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions that are specifically attributable to SBES. Program component net impacts were estimated by applying the NTGR listed above to the revised gross savings by using the follo...
AI summary The document discusses net savings from the Smart Building Energy Savings (SBES) program, including energy use reductions, calculations using the NTGR factor, and the impact on GHG emissions. It provides data on energy and demand savings, as well as the methodology used to estimate net savings and their environmental benefits.
Table 10: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for SBES – Audit Path Ca f Me te g or y o as ur e Cu to s m H V A C K i he tc n La dr un y L ig h in t g Re fr ig io t er a n A H P M i lo t To l fo A l l ta r Ca ies te g or En Sa in...
AI summary Table 10 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for the Smart Building Energy Savings (SBES) program under the Audit Path. The table includes metrics for various categories such as Energy Nova Scotia, heating, cooling, and refrigeration, with numerical values representing energy savings and efficiency factors.
Table 11: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings for SBES – DIY Path Ca f Me te g or y o as ur e Ag ic l tu r u re H V A C K i he tc n L ig h in t g M V S D Re fr ig io t er a n So la r To l fo A l l ta r Ca ies te g or En Sa in er g...
AI summary Table 11 presents evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for the Smart Building Energy Savings (SBES) DIY Path, including data on various sectors and energy-saving measures. The table includes metrics such as energy savings, gross energy savings, and net energy savings in gigawatt-hours.
Table 12: Comparison of Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator for SBES Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENS 11.852 GWh 11.852 GWh 0.82 9.673 GWh Evaluation Results 1...
AI summary Table 12 compares tracked and evaluated savings from the Smart Building Energy Savings (SBES) program. Evaluated net energy savings are about 1% lower than tracked values, with tracked gross savings adjusted downward by 8%. The tracked NTGR was significantly below the 2017 value, leading to underestimated net savings.
SBES Appendix I: On-Site Visit Sampling Methodology and Protocol Appendix II: Calculation Example Appendix III: Effective Useful Life Appendix IV: Algorithm for Participant Spillover Calculation Appendix V: 2018 Recommendations
AI summary The text provides appendices related to the SBES program, including sampling methodology, calculation examples, effective useful life, spillover calculation algorithms, and 2018 recommendations. These appendices support the implementation and evaluation of the Smart Building Energy Savings initiative.
On-site Visit Protocol for Participant Visits The SBES protocol was developed based on the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Mail-in protocol, the installed measures are very similar, with the exception of building envelope insulation upgrades...
AI summary The SBES protocol was developed using the BER Mail-in protocol, with similar installed measures except for building envelope insulation upgrades. The protocol includes an Excel-based format with measure-specific data entry fields. In 2018, new questions were added to collect information about participants' knowledge and interest in measures beyond lighting.
Facility Occupancy Schedule: Please fill the table below for each different occupancy schedule. Business Hours (Mon-Fri) Business Hours (Weekend) Staff Early Open Staff Early Close Cleaning Hours per Week Days/Year with No Occupancy Workin...
AI summary The document provides templates for filling out facility occupancy schedules and daily lighting operation schedules, which are used for energy management and planning purposes. These schedules help in understanding occupancy patterns and energy usage across different days and times.
Lighting: Collect the information in the table below if lighting measures were installed. Econoler will then compare the information collected with the information in the tracking sheet. compare the information collected with the informati...
AI summary The document provides instructions for collecting and comparing lighting measure data with a tracking sheet, including details on location, heating/cooling, lamp status, and equipment quantities and wattages.
Collect the information in the table below if motor and/or VSDs measures were installed. Econoler will then compare the information collected with the information in the tracking sheet. Motors and Drives: Motors Total number of motors inst...
AI summary The document requests the collection of information regarding the installation of motors and variable speed drives (VSDs) to be compared with a tracking sheet. It includes details such as location, motor type, efficiency, and application type.
VSD 1 VSD 2 Validate that the new VSDs do not replace old VSDs? Validate that the new VSDs are operational? If not, why and since when? Was the VSD commissioned? (Y/N): What is VSD using as feedback mechanism? (VSD either modulates speed t...
AI summary The document includes a table for validating new Variable Speed Drives (VSDs), asking about their operation, commissioning status, feedback mechanisms, motor horsepower, equipment type, usage hours, and manufacturer details. It also mentions a section on Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC).
Water Heating: Heat Pump or Switch to Natural Gas New HP COP: Manufacturer & Model #: Is the HWHP used for DHW heating? Space Heating Energy Type? Hot Water Demand Metric Hot Water temp? Hours per day operation? Is HWHP in conditioned loca...
AI summary The text presents a table for collecting information related to water heating systems, including heat pumps and natural gas, as well as commercial dish washers. It outlines data points such as manufacturer details, operational parameters, and energy usage metrics for tracking and evaluation purposes.
Commercial Fryers Standard capacity commercial fryer Quantity Installed: Specify if electric or gas? Does it replace an electric fryer? Is it a new installation? Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Validate the equipme...
AI summary The text presents a table with fields related to commercial fryers and refrigeration equipment, including details such as installation quantity, energy source, equipment status, and ENERGY STAR certification. The table is part of a regulatory proceeding document and appears to be used for data collection or reporting purposes.
Commercial Kitchen Ventilation Hoods VSD for kitchen exhaust fans Quantity Installed: Size of the fan controlled by the VSD [hp]: Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Is the equipment controlled by T° and optical sensor...
AI summary The document contains tables and forms for collecting information on commercial kitchen ventilation hoods, laundry equipment, and water heating sources, including details on installation, usage, and technical specifications.
Energy and Peak Demand Savings Algorithms The following algorithms include the parameters required to determine the annual energy savings and the annual peak demand savings associated with an air source heat pump greater than 65,000 kBtu/h...
AI summary This section presents mathematical algorithms to calculate annual energy savings and annual peak demand savings for air source heat pumps with a capacity greater than 65,000 kBtu/hr. The formulas incorporate parameters such as heat credit (HC), efficiency factors (HEF and CEF), and quantities (QTY) to determine savings.
Tracked Savings Calculation The parameters for the savings calculation were obtained from the SBES participant application and factors determined from the BER CIRx Screening Tool lookup tables for the measure. [Table](#page-94-0) 2 below s...
AI summary The parameters for the savings calculation were obtained from the SBES participant application and factors determined from the BER CIRx Screening Tool lookup tables for a 10-ton rooftop heat pump.
Table 2: An Example of the Tracked Variables Calculation Measure – 10-ton Rooftop Heat Pump Parameter Value Source Heating Capacity 82.5 Tracking Sheet Low Temp Heating Capacity 59 Tracking Sheet Cooling Capacity 114 Tracking Sheet Heating...
AI summary Table 2 provides an example of the tracked variables calculation for a 10-ton rooftop heat pump, including parameters such as heating and cooling capacity, efficiency factors, and energy savings. It notes a discrepancy between the equation descriptions and the actual values used in calculations.
Revised Savings Calculation The revised savings calculations are based on two adjustments, and, as a result, the energy and demand savings have been impacted. The first adjustment made was the revision of the base case HVAC systems to thos...
AI summary The revised savings calculations involved two adjustments: revising the base case HVAC systems to reflect actual site conditions and correcting the Cooling Efficiency Factor. These changes impacted both energy and demand savings estimates. The baseline HSPF was updated, but the Coefficient of Performance at -15°C remained undetermined, leading to nil demand savings. The discrepancy in the Cooling Efficiency Factor value was not fully explained due to insufficient documentation.
Adjustment Ratio Algorithm The adjustment ratio is determined by comparing the revised savings values with the tracked savings values. Due to the revisions made to this measure, the calculated ratios were 0.145 for energy savings and 0 for...
AI summary The adjustment ratio algorithm compares revised and tracked savings values, resulting in a 0.145 ratio for energy savings and 0 for peak demand savings. Calculations are provided with specific numerical values for both energy and peak demand savings.
General-use and decorative lamps The methodology used for establishing the equivalent EUL of general-use and decorative lamps is based on the information shown in [Table](#page-98-0) 4 and the equation below. The equivalent EUL calculation...
AI summary The document explains the methodology for calculating the equivalent EUL (Energy Use Life) of general-use and decorative lamps, using a blend of incandescent and halogen incandescent lamps as the baseline technology. The calculation considers the remaining lifetime of lamps, the impact of legislation changes, and the use of LED A-type lamps with a rated life of 25,000 hours.
Table 4: Baseline Evolution during the Effective Useful Life of LED A-type Lamps Typical Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen Incandescent and Incandescent Baseline 1 year (2018) Halogen Incandescent Baseline 4.7 years (2019-2023) (W) L...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the baseline evolution of LED A-type lamps over their effective useful life, comparing typical replaced lamps with halogen incandescent and incandescent baselines in terms of wattage and displaced wattage across different time periods.
Table 6: Baseline Evolution during the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps in Downlight Fixtures Typical Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Lamp Halogen Baseline 6 years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation4 5.3 y...
AI summary Table 6 outlines the baseline evolution of LED reflector lamps in downlight fixtures over their effective useful life. It compares typical replaced lamps with efficient lamps, showing wattage differences and displaced wattage for halogen and CFL equivalent baselines under U.S. federal legislation.
Table 7: Tracked and Revised Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values by Lighting Measure Type Lighting Measure Type List Category Tracked Equival ent EUL (years) Rated Life (hours) Annual HOU (hours) Revised EUL (years) Revised Equivalent...
AI summary Table 7 presents tracked and revised equivalent effective useful life values for various lighting measure types. It includes details such as rated life, annual hours of use, and revised EUL values for different categories of lighting fixtures and lamps.
ALGORITHM FOR PARTICIPANT SPILLOVER CALCULATION Participant spillover of SBES was measured using a participant survey conducted during the on-site visits. Participants were asked whether following their participation in SBES, they implemen...
AI summary The algorithm for calculating participant spillover in the SBES program involves surveying participants to determine if they implemented additional energy efficiency measures outside of program incentives. Savings from these non-incentivized measures are then compared to those from incentivized measures to assess the program's influence.
2018 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 evaluation of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program component, as well as all 2017 evaluation recommendations that...
AI summary This section outlines the 2018 recommendations from the Evaluator regarding the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program, including unresolved recommendations from the 2017 evaluation.
Sections Recommendations Market Evaluation 1. Continue outreach to HVAC contractors as a means to build awareness of non lighting energy savings opportunities and SBES participation. Many participants rely on regular lighting and HVAC cont...
AI summary The document recommends continuing outreach to HVAC contractors to increase awareness of non-lighting energy savings opportunities and SBES participation. This engagement aims to influence the market and broaden recognition of energy efficiency in HVAC and other non-lighting systems.
Table 45: Energy Savings Associated with Standards for Fluorescent Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market 40 Table 46: Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for Commercial and Industrial Lamps 41 Table 47: Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for General...
AI summary The text presents a series of tables and figures related to energy savings from fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia, including peak demand-to-energy ratios, market size estimates, and savings values associated with the regulation of fluorescent lamp ballasts.
The 2018 evaluation served to estimate the 2018 annual impact on energy and peak demand savings as a result of introducing new regulations into the Nova Scotia market, which govern the products targeted by the federal government's Amendmen...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation estimated energy and peak demand savings from new regulations in Nova Scotia, including federal Amendment 13 and provincial MEPS regulations. The savings were 23.809 GWh and 4.008 MW at the generator, equivalent to 14,585 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided GHG emissions.
Table 2: Evaluated Energy and Peak Demand Savings at the Generator for 2018 Product Energy Savings at the Generator (GWh) Peak Demand Savings at the Generator (MW) Incandescent Lamps 9.899 1.178 LED Street Lighting 1.291 0.321 New Building...
AI summary Table 2 presents energy and peak demand savings at the generator for 2018, attributed to various products and building categories. The savings from Codes & Standards (C&S) are distinct from those from Energy Nova Scotia (ENS) programs, as C&S savings result from increased mandatory minimum efficiency levels, while ENS savings are based on product efficiency improvements compared to regulated standards.
1 CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND To improve the efficiency of energy-consuming products marketed in Canada, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has been implementing regulations regarding minimum energy efficiency standards (MEPS) by issuing a series...
AI summary This section outlines the implementation of minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) in Canada and Nova Scotia, including amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations and their impact on product categories such as lighting and appliances. Efficiency Nova Scotia evaluated these regulations from 2012 to 2018, with the 2018 evaluation focusing on additional products covered by Amendment 13.
2 METHODOLOGY Figure 1 below illustrates the research strategy used and the various activities carried out as part of the 2018 evaluation. Figure 1: Methodological Model The Evaluator selected the standards to be evaluated based on the pre...
AI summary The 2018 evaluation aimed to quantify the annual impact of seven regulations in the Nova Scotia market by assessing market size, the portion of the market affected, and unitary savings values based on energy consumption differences between previous and new regulations.
Interviews with Market Actors From early December 2018 to the end of January 2019, representatives from industry associations and retailers provided help in explaining the data, confirming their reliability, and indicating how to best use...
AI summary Interviews with industry associations, retailers, municipal and provincial staff, and Nova Scotia Power (NSP) were conducted from early December 2018 to January 2019 to gather information on data reliability, usage, and updates for 2018, as well as changes in energy savings and market activity.
Analysis Once all the interviews were completed and the data were collected, market size estimates were developed. With the market size for each product category, the portion of the Atlantic market impacted by the regulations were determin...
AI summary The analysis estimates the market impact of new regulations in Nova Scotia by determining the number of units affected and the resulting energy savings. Efforts were made to avoid overlap with savings from ENS programs, as C&S savings stem from increasing regulated minimum efficiency standards, while ENS savings are based on product efficiency improvements.
3.1.2 Regulation Description Amendment 10 to the Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations was developed and put into effect on January 1, 2012 to enable a phased-in introduction of lighting standards. The regulation was inten...
AI summary Amendments 10 and 12B to the Energy Efficiency Regulations were introduced in 2012 and 2014 to phase out incandescent lamps and promote energy-efficient lighting. Amendment 12B delayed the phase-out to allow more time for consumer education, technological advances, and addressing concerns about CFLs. The regulation aimed to improve lighting efficiency by 30% and align with American standards.
3.1.3 Market Size Estimate EFC provided information about lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to the end of 2018, and this information was converted into estimates for Nova Scotia. Of note, 2013 was the last year of shi...
AI summary EFC provided data on lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to 2018, which was used to estimate Nova Scotia's market size if energy efficiency standards had not been implemented. The Evaluator used 2013 as the baseline year and applied a -5.56% annual decline to project 2018 market size. The data also included estimated wattage distribution of lamps sold.
The minimum peak demand savings (W/unit) were estimated based on the data outlined in Table 5 above. For example, a 100 W lamp must be replaced by a lamp of no more than 72 W (28 W in savings). The annual energy savings (kWh/unit) were est...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used to estimate minimum peak demand savings and annual energy savings based on lamp replacements and average usage data. The estimates use 2.9 hours of daily use, derived from the residential sector, where 90% of incandescent lamps are sold.
Product Class Annual Energy Savings (kWh/unit) 100 W 30 75 W 23 60 W 18 40 W 12
AI summary The table lists the annual energy savings in kWh per unit for different product classes, including 100 W, 75 W, 60 W, and 40 W, with corresponding values of 30, 23, 18, and 12 respectively.
3.1.6 Interactive Effects In a home, interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of C&S, replacing incan...
AI summary This section discusses interactive effects in energy efficiency, particularly how replacing incandescent lamps with more efficient alternatives affects heating and cooling loads. Calculations for these effects were updated in 2018 using data on electrical heating and air conditioning usage, focusing on the residential sector.
Table 9: Interactive Effects Calculations for Lighting Products Parameter % of Homes14 Energy Interactive Effects Factor15 Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Heat Pump Heating with Air Conditioning 15% -24.0% -90.0% Electrical Heating...
AI summary Table 9 presents interactive effects calculations for lighting products, showing how different heating and air conditioning configurations impact energy use and peak demand. The weighted interactive effects factors are -22.20% for energy and -43.00% for peak demand.
3.1.7 Energy Savings - at the Meter The Evaluator estimates that the phase-out of incandescent light lamps in Nova Scotia achieved a total of 9.000 GWh in energy savings in 2018, as summarized in Table 10.
AI summary The Evaluator estimates that the phase-out of incandescent light lamps in Nova Scotia achieved 9.000 GWh in energy savings in 2018, as summarized in Table 10.
Table 10: Energy Savings Associated with Phasing Out Incandescent Light Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 (lamps) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/lamp) Interactive Effects...
AI summary Table 10 outlines the energy savings associated with phasing out incandescent light lamps in Nova Scotia, showing the number of lamps, annual energy savings per lamp, interactive effects factor, and total energy savings in 2018. The table highlights energy savings for different wattage classes and provides a total energy savings of 9.000 GWh.
Product Class Peak Demand-to energy Ratio Interactive Effects Factor for Energy Savings Interactive Effects Factor for Peak Demand Savings Adjusted Peak Demand-to energy Ratio 100 W 0.162 -22.2% -43.00% 0.119 75 W 0.162 -22.2% -43.00% 0.11...
AI summary The text presents a table showing peak demand-to-energy ratios and interactive effects factors for various light bulb wattages, along with an estimated total peak demand savings of 1.071 MW in Nova Scotia for 2018.
Table 12: Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of Incandescent Lamp Standards in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Total Energy Savings at the Meter in 2018 (GWh) Adjusted Peak Demand to-energy Ratio (MW/GWh) Total Peak...
AI summary Table 12 presents peak demand savings from incandescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia, showing total energy and peak demand reductions for various lamp wattages. Section 3.2 discusses LED street lights, indicating a focus on energy efficiency and demand-side management.
3.2.1 Product Description LED street lights provide a more energy efficient means of meeting the street lighting requirements of Nova Scotia municipalities. Many lighting manufacturers have been making major efforts to develop LED products...
AI summary LED street lights are highlighted as an energy-efficient solution for Nova Scotia municipalities. The technology has advanced rapidly, with many manufacturers contributing to its development. A report from DMD and Associates Ltd. from 2009 is referenced to support this claim.
3.2.3 Market Size Estimate In 2009, the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities commissioned DMD & Associates Ltd. to prepare a report 19 entitled Energy Efficient Street Lighting Strategies for Nova Scotia Municipalities. As part of this work...
AI summary In 2009, the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities commissioned a report on energy efficient street lighting strategies, which included an inventory of 135,964 street lights in Nova Scotia, detailing their energy consumption and distribution by lamp type.
Table 13: Existing Lighting Unit Inventory in Nova Scotia, 2009 Type Energy Consumption Range for an Average Month (kWh/month) Proportion of Inventory Proportion of Total Power Consumed High-pressure sodium From 32 to 150 82% 73.5% Mercury...
AI summary Table 13 presents the existing lighting unit inventory in Nova Scotia in 2009, detailing the types of lighting units, their energy consumption ranges, and their proportion of the total inventory and power consumed. High-pressure sodium lamps dominate both in terms of inventory and power consumption.
3.2.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation In the abovementioned report, DMD & Associates Ltd. estimated that street light total electricity consumption in 2009 was 88,886,988 kWh. This represents an average annual electricity...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of LED street light conversions in Nova Scotia, highlighting the ownership transfer of street lights to HRM in 2014 and the subsequent replacement of units with LEDs. It details the number of conversions by HRM and NSP, estimates the energy savings, and notes potential underestimation due to non-response from some municipalities.
3.2.5 Unitary Savings Values To estimate the total reduction in energy use resulting from replacements with LEDs, the Evaluator conducted a literature review of LED street lighting case studies from other jurisdictions. Although most juris...
AI summary The Evaluator used a literature review of LED street lighting case studies to estimate energy savings. A conservative rounded average of 35% energy savings was used, leading to a unitary energy savings value of 229 kWh per street lighting unit and a displaced wattage of 57 W per unit.
3.2.6 Energy Savings – at the Meter The total energy savings associated with the 5,390 LED lighting units installed in 2018 were estimated at 1.234 GWh, as summarized in Table 15 below.
AI summary The total energy savings from installing 5,390 LED lighting units in 2018 were estimated at 1.234 GWh, as presented in Table 15.
Table 15: Energy Savings Associated with the Introduction of LED Street Lighting in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Number of Lighting Units Replaced in 2018 Annual Energy Savings (kWh/unit) Total Incremental Energy Savings at the Met...
AI summary Table 15 provides data on energy savings from the introduction of LED street lighting in Nova Scotia, showing 5,390 units replaced in 2018 with an annual energy saving of 229 kWh per unit, resulting in a total incremental energy savings of 1.234 GWh. The section also discusses peak demand savings at the meter.
sample of 90 recently built houses had an average EnerGuide rating of 77. Based on this analysis, the implementation of the new building regulations would result in an EnerGuide rating increase of 1. To determine the energy savings value o...
AI summary A sample of 90 recently built houses had an average EnerGuide rating of 77. The analysis suggests that new building regulations would increase this rating by 1 point. The energy savings value of an EnerGuide point was calculated using data from the 2015 ENS New Home Construction evaluation, which found that building simulations overestimated electricity consumption by 16 percent. The final savings value per EnerGuide point was adjusted to 1,278 kWh/year.
Table 21: Electrical Energy Savings by Building Type 53 Building Type Energy Consum nption (kWh/m²) Energy Savings Savings (%) Building Type NECB 2011 NECB 2015 (kWh/m²) Mid-rise Apartment 218 213 5.08 2.33% Box Retail Store 260 252 8.87 3...
AI summary Table 21 presents electrical energy savings by building type based on the National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) 2011 and 2015. It shows the reduction in energy consumption for mid-rise apartments, box retail stores, office buildings, and warehouses, along with the percentage of savings.
Table 22: Energy Savings Associated with the Introduction of the Building Code Regulation in the Houses and Small Buildings Sectors in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Number of Single Houses Non-compliance Rate (%) Annual Energy Savin...
AI summary Table 22 outlines energy savings from the introduction of the Building Code Regulation in the Houses and Small Buildings sectors in Nova Scotia. It indicates that 58% of 1,869 single houses were non-compliant, resulting in an annual energy saving of 1,278 kWh per house and a total incremental energy saving of 1.385 GWh in 2018.
To establish the total electrical energy savings associated with the large building, apartment and condominium sectors, the Evaluator applied the energy savings per square meter outlined in Subsection 3.3.4 above to the total floor area va...
AI summary The Evaluator estimated total electrical energy savings from large building, apartment, and condominium sectors at 2.753 GWh, with multi-unit residential buildings contributing 65% and large commercial buildings 30%. These estimates were derived using energy savings per square meter and total floor area values based on building permit data.
Table 23: Energy Savings Associated with the Introduction of the Building Code Regulation for Large Buildings, Apartments and Condominiums Building Type Total Floor Area (m2) Energy Savings (kWh/m2) Total Energy Savings at the Meter in 201...
AI summary Table 23 presents energy savings associated with the introduction of the Building Code Regulation for various building types in Nova Scotia, including multi-unit residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. The data highlights the total floor area, energy savings per square meter, and total energy savings at the meter in 2018.
Table 24: Total Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of the Building Code Regulation for the Houses and Small Buildings Sectors in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Number of Single Houses Non-compliance Rate (%) Annual...
AI summary Table 24 presents total peak demand savings associated with the introduction of the Building Code Regulation for the Houses and Small Buildings sectors in Nova Scotia. It shows that 58% non-compliance rate among 1,869 single houses resulted in an annual peak demand saving of 362 W per house, totaling 0.392 MW in 2018.
3.4.3 Market Size Estimate AHAM Canada provided information about clothes washer shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2014 to 2018, and this information was converted into estimates for Nova Scotia based on its share of Atlantic Canada's tota...
AI summary AHAM Canada provided data on clothes washer shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2014 to 2018, which was used to estimate Nova Scotia's market size based on its population share. NRCan's cost-benefit analysis report on Amendment 1355 also provided shipment breakdowns by washer type, with Table 26 listing the 2018 market size for each type.
Table 26: Clothes Washer Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class Atlantic Market in 2018 Nova Scotia Market in 2018 Tier I - Front-loading 12,418 4,917 Tier II - Top-loading 42,276 16,741 Total 54,694 21,659 3.4.4 Portion...
AI summary Table 26 provides estimates of the clothes washer market size in Nova Scotia for 2018, including front-loading and top-loading models. Section 3.4.4 discusses the portion of the market impacted by the regulation.
Product Class Annual Energy Domestic Water Weighted Average Туре Domestic Water Heating Source Savings (kWh/unit) Heating Source Proportion Electricity Energy Savings (kWh/unit) Tier I – Front-loading Electrical 123 78.6% 100 Non-electrica...
AI summary Table 28 presents unitary savings values for clothes washers, distinguishing between front-loading and top-loading models, and electrical versus non-electrical heating sources, with weighted average electricity energy savings provided for each category.
3.4.6 Energy Savings - at the Meter By multiplying the above-listed unitary savings values to the number of Tier I front-loading and Tier II top-loading clothes washers affected by the regulation in 2018 in Nova Scotia, the Evaluator estim...
AI summary The Evaluator estimated that the introduction of a regulation on clothes washers in 2018 resulted in energy savings of 1.012 GWh at the meter, calculated by multiplying unitary savings values with the number of affected washers.
Table 29: Energy Savings Associated with New Clothes Washer MEPS in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Nova Scotia Market in 2018 - Units Percentage of Nova Scotia Market Affected by the Standard in 2018 Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/uni...
AI summary Table 29 presents energy savings associated with new clothes washer MEPS in the Nova Scotia market in 2018, showing the number of units, percentage of the market affected, annual energy savings per unit, and total energy savings in GWh for Tier I and Tier II washers.
Table 30: Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of Clothes Washer MEPS in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Total Energy Savings at the Meter in 2018 (GWh) Demand-to- Energy Ratio Total Peak Demand Savings at the Meter in...
AI summary Table 30 presents peak demand savings associated with the introduction of clothes washer minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) in the Nova Scotia market. It shows energy and demand savings for front-loading and top-loading washers in 2018.
3.5.3 Market Size Estimate EFC provided information about lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to the end of 2018. NRCan data indicated that EFC reported shipments in 2017 represented about 75 percent of the full residen...
AI summary The document discusses market size estimates for lighting products in Nova Scotia based on data from EFC and NRCan, showing the shift from incandescent to LED reflector lamps and the impact of energy efficiency regulations on sales trends from 2004 to 2018.
According to NRCan, a portion of each product class already met the requirements due to U.S. standards, and only the affected portion of the 2018 actual shipments represents the impact achieved by the standard, as summarized in Table 33.
AI summary According to NRCan, some products already met requirements due to U.S. standards, and only a portion of 2018 shipments reflects the impact of the standard, as detailed in Table 33.
3.5.5 Unitary Savings Values As outlined in Table 34, NRCan specifies the annual unitary energy savings for general-service incandescent reflector lamps affected by Amendment 13.62 NRCan estimates that the increase energy efficiency was ap...
AI summary Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) estimates that Amendment 13.62 increased the energy efficiency of general-service incandescent reflector lamps by approximately 25 percent, as outlined in Table 34.
Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of C&S, replacing lamps with more efficient products causes...
AI summary Interactive effects refer to how energy efficiency measures can influence heating and cooling loads. The Evaluator used specific factors for residential and commercial reflector lamps, based on data from the Business Energy Rebates program and on-site evaluations. These factors were used to calculate overall energy and peak demand savings.
Table 35: Interactive Effects for General-service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Product Class Energy Interactive Effects Factor Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Residential 50 W -22.20% -43.00% Residential 75 W -22.20% -43.00% Residen...
AI summary The table provides interactive effects factors for general-service incandescent reflector lamps, showing the impact on energy and peak demand for residential and commercial products. The section 'Energy Savings - at the Meter' likely discusses the energy savings implications of these lamps.
The Evaluator estimated that phasing out incandescent reflector lamps in Nova Scotia allowed to achieve a total of 1.331 GWh in energy savings in 2018, as summarized in Table 36.
AI summary The Evaluator estimated that phasing out incandescent reflector lamps in Nova Scotia achieved 1.331 GWh in energy savings in 2018, as summarized in Table 36.
Table 36: Energy Savings Associated with Phasing Out Incandescent Light Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 (lamps) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/lamp) Energy Interactive...
AI summary Table 36 presents energy savings associated with phasing out incandescent light lamps in Nova Scotia, showing the number of lamps, annual energy savings, energy interactive effects factor, and total energy savings at the meter for different product classes in 2018.
Table 38: Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for Incandescent Reflector Lamps Product Class Peak Demand to-energy Ratio Interactive Effects Factor for Energy Savings Interactive Effects Factor for Peak Demand Savings Adjusted Peak Deman...
AI summary Table 38 presents adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratios for incandescent reflector lamps, showing reductions in both energy and peak demand savings. The Evaluator estimated Nova Scotia's total peak demand savings at 0.162 MW for 2018.
Table 39: Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of Incandescent Reflector Lamp Standards in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Total Energy Savings at the Meter in 2018 (GWh) Adjusted Peak Demand to-energy Ratio (MW/GWh) T...
AI summary Table 39 presents peak demand savings from the introduction of incandescent reflector lamp standards in Nova Scotia. It shows energy and peak demand savings for various residential and commercial lamp classes in 2018, with total energy savings of 1.331 GWh and total peak demand savings of 0.162 MW.
3.6.1 Product Description General-service fluorescent lamps (GSFL) are tube lights generally used for overhead lighting in offices and commercial spaces. They are often installed in areas where they are used for long periods of time. T12 l...
AI summary This section describes general-service fluorescent lamps (GSFL), including their evolution from T12 to T5 models, their usage in commercial settings, and the exclusion of certain specialized lamps from the regulatory definition.
3.6.3 Market Size Estimate EFC provided information about lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to the end of 2018, and this information was converted into estimates for Nova Scotia based on population share. There was a...
AI summary EFC provided data on lighting product shipments to Atlantic Canada from 2004 to 2018, with Nova Scotia estimates based on population share. Shipments peaked in 2013 and declined until 2017, with a small increase in 2018. Market shares for T5, T8, and T12 lamps remained stable, and NRCan provided further breakdowns for 2017. Table 41 compares projected and actual shipment data for 2018.
Table 41: Fluorescent Lamp Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class NRCan Share of Class Shipments in 2017 Actual Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2018 (lamps) Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 25 W (standard-output) 37% 6,6...
AI summary Table 41 provides estimates of fluorescent lamp market size in Nova Scotia for 2018, categorized by product class, including residential and commercial/industrial (C&I) lamps, with data on shipments and NRCan share of class shipments in 2017.
Table 42: Estimated Portion of the Fluorescent Lamp Market Impacted by the Regulation Product Class Percentage of Total Projected Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 201864 Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standa...
AI summary Table 42 estimates the portion of the fluorescent lamp market in Nova Scotia affected by a regulation in 2018. The table indicates that T12 lamps in both residential and commercial/industrial sectors are fully impacted, while other lamp types are not affected.
Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of C&S, replacing lamps with more efficient products causes...
AI summary The text discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically focusing on how replacing lamps with more efficient products affects heating and cooling loads. The Evaluator used factors derived from past evaluations and onsite visits to calculate these effects for residential and commercial/industrial lamps, adjusting for factors like recessed fixtures.
Table 44: Interactive Effects for General-service Fluorescent Lamps Product Class Energy Interactive Effects Factor Peak Demand Interactive Effects Factor Res. T5 ≥ 1,125 mm and ≤ 1,200 mm, ≥ 26 W (standard-output) -18.19% -35.23% Res. T5...
AI summary Table 44 presents interactive effects for general-service fluorescent lamps, showing energy and peak demand reductions for residential and commercial/industrial (C&I) products. Residential lamps show higher energy and peak demand reductions compared to C&I lamps, where peak demand effects are not provided for some categories.
3.6.7 Energy Savings - at the Meter The Evaluator estimated that the standards for fluorescent lamps in Nova Scotia allowed to achieve a total of 2.878 GWh in energy savings in 2018, as summarized in Table 45.
AI summary The Evaluator estimated that energy savings from fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia reached 2.878 GWh in 2018, as outlined in Table 45.
Table 45: Energy Savings Associated with Standards for Fluorescent Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 (lamps) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/lamp) Interactive Effects Fact...
AI summary Table 45 presents energy savings associated with fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia. The table shows that only T12 lamps in residential and commercial/industrial sectors had non-zero shipments and energy savings, while other lamp types had zero shipments affected by the standard. Total energy savings in 2018 were 2.878 GWh.
Table 46: Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for Commercial and Industrial Lamps Type of Building Average Peak Demand to-energy Ratio per Sector (W/kWh) Overall Average Peak Demand-to-energy Ratio (W/kWh) Commercial 0.125 Industrial 0.180 0.139...
AI summary Table 46 presents peak demand-to-energy ratios for commercial and industrial lamps, showing 0.125 for commercial and 0.180 for industrial. The text notes that interactive effects factors from Subsection 3.6.6 were applied to residential lamps, while commercial and industrial ratios already accounted for these effects through whole-building energy modelling.
Table 47: Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for General-service Fluorescent Lamps Product Class Peak Demand-to Energy Ratio Interactive Effects Factor for Energy Savings Interactive Effects Factor for Peak Demand Savings Adjusted Peak...
AI summary Table 47 presents adjusted peak demand-to-energy ratios for various fluorescent lamp products, showing reductions in both energy and peak demand savings. The Evaluator estimated total peak demand savings in Nova Scotia at 0.394 MW in 2018.
Table 48: Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of General-service Fluorescent Lamp Standards in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Total Energy Savings at the Meter in 2018 (GWh) Adjusted Peak Demand-to energy Ratio (MW/G...
AI summary Table 48 presents peak demand savings from the introduction of general-service fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia. The data shows minimal savings for most lamp types, with the highest savings observed for T12 lamps in both residential and commercial/industrial sectors.
3.7.1 Product Description Fluorescent lamp ballasts include electronic or magnetic ballasts that regulate the flow of electricity to fluorescent lighting systems. The most common ballasts are those used in GSFL for overhead lighting in off...
AI summary This section describes fluorescent lamp ballasts, including their types and specifications, such as support for T5, T8, and T12 lamps, and their use in overhead lighting in offices and commercial spaces.
Table 50: Estimated Portion of the Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Market Impacted by the Regulation Product Class Percentage of Total Projected Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 2018 Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the...
AI summary Table 50 provides an estimate of the portion of the fluorescent lamp ballast market in Nova Scotia impacted by a regulation in 2018, showing percentages of total projected shipments affected and the number of shipments for different product classes.
3.7.5 Unitary Savings Values As listed in Table 51 below, NRCan specifies in Amendment 13 the average unitary savings values for T5, T8 and T12 fluorescent lamp ballasts with a residential, commercial and industrial use.
AI summary The document outlines the average unitary savings values for T5, T8, and T12 fluorescent lamp ballasts with residential, commercial, and industrial use as specified by NRCan in Amendment 13.
3.7.6 Interactive Effects Interactive effects occur when the implementation of energy efficiency measures has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements such as heating and cooling. In the case of C&S, replacing lamps with more...
AI summary This section discusses interactive effects of energy efficiency measures, specifically the impact of replacing lamps with more efficient products on heating and cooling loads. It references Natural Resources Canada's cost-benefit analysis and refers to factors for fluorescent ballasts outlined in a prior subsection.
3.7.7 Energy Savings - at the Meter The Evaluator estimated that the standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts in Nova Scotia allowed to achieve a total of 2.381 GWh in energy savings for 2018, as summarized in Table 53.
AI summary The Evaluator estimated that the standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts in Nova Scotia allowed achieving 2.381 GWh in energy savings for 2018, as summarized in Table 53.
Table 53: Energy Savings Associated with Phasing Out Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/unit) Interactive Effects Factor...
AI summary Table 53 details the energy savings associated with phasing out fluorescent lamp ballasts in Nova Scotia, categorized by product class and usage sector. The table includes shipments, annual energy savings per unit, interactive effects factors, and total energy savings in 2018, highlighting the impact of different lamp types and sectors.
Table 54: Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of Fluorescent Lamp Standards in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Total Energy Savings at the Meter in 2018 (GWh) Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratio (MW/GWh) Total Peak D...
AI summary Table 54 provides data on peak demand savings from the introduction of fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia, showing energy savings and their impact on peak demand across different product classes and sectors.
Table 55: Codes and Standards Overall Incremental Annual Energy and Peak Demand Savings, 2018 Pr du Ca t te o c g or y In de t ca n sc en La m p s D S L E t L tre e ig h in t g Ne w Bu i l d in g s ( Ho d us es a n Sm l l a i in ) Bu l d g...
AI summary Table 55 presents incremental annual energy and peak demand savings from codes and standards in 2018, categorizing data by product category, lighting types, building sizes, and other factors. The table includes various lighting technologies and energy efficiency programs but lacks detailed numerical data in the provided excerpt.