HomeEnergy EfficiencyM12282Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Energy Efficiency" in M12282

Matter: EfficiencyOne - New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans Application for Approval of New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans
457 passages 42 documents

Energy Efficiency across all matters →

E-1Notice of Application and Evidence 313 passages
Section 5
t to the PUA that enacted the following relevant changes: a) Changing the level at which cost-effectiveness testing would apply from the program level to the portfolio level; and b) Adding a definition of “demand-side management” to includ...

AI summary The text outlines legislative changes under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) and the Energy Reform (2024) Act, which expanded cost-effectiveness testing and redefined demand-side management. These changes informed the development of a new BCA test by EFG, influenced by policy goals and the National Standard Practice Manual for DER.

Section 43
Page 10 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence

AI summary The document presents the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and includes evidence related to the proceeding. It outlines the analysis and evaluation of the EfficiencyOne program's benefits and costs.

Section 48
Page 12 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence

AI summary This document is part of a regulatory proceeding concerning the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application. It outlines the evidence submitted in support of the application, which likely pertains to energy efficiency programs and their associated benefits and costs.

Section 51
Page 13 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence

AI summary The document is a benefit-cost analysis test application submitted by EfficiencyOne as part of a regulatory proceeding. It outlines the evidence being presented to support the application.

Section 53
rates, tolls, charges, tariffs, capital applications or other 36 matters that are consistent with the purpose of this Act, the More Access to Energy Act 37 and the regulations. DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 14 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-C...

AI summary The document discusses the filing of an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, which is related to regulatory matters under the Public Utilities Act and the More Access to Energy Act.

Section 54
Page 14 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence

AI summary This document is part of a regulatory proceeding related to the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, focusing on evidence submission. It involves an analysis of energy efficiency programs and their associated benefits and costs.

Section 55
1 The More Access to Energy Act establishes the following purposes: 2 3 2 The purpose of this Act is to 4 5 (a) increase competition and innovation in the Province's energy sector; 6 7 (b) ensure the provision of a safe, secure, reliable a...

AI summary The More Access to Energy Act aims to increase competition and innovation in Nova Scotia's energy sector, ensure a reliable energy supply, and support sustainable development and prosperity as defined by the Environment Act and Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act. It also outlines a transition to an independent energy system operator.

Section 56
responsibility are integrated and recognized as being 34 interconnected. 18 35 36 Furthermore, the More Access to Energy Act states that one purpose of the legislation is to support the 37 sustainable development, sustainable prosperity, e...

AI summary The text discusses the integration of responsibilities under the More Access to Energy Act and the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act, emphasizing energy efficiency and equitable access for low-income and marginalized communities. It highlights legislative changes that expand the Energy Board's considerations, particularly in relation to DSM activities.

Section 57
ative changes noted above have broadened the scope of what the Energy Board must now 7 consider when assessing the applications that come before it, including those pertaining to DSM activities. 8 9 6.3 LEGISLATIVE MANDATE TO CONSIDER NON-...

AI summary Recent legislative changes have expanded the Energy Board's mandate to consider non-utility impacts, including environmental and sustainability factors, when assessing DSM activities. The Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act and the More Access to Energy Act now require the integration of GHG reduction targets and sustainable development into regulatory decisions.

Section 58
ctrification programs, which can 27 be influenced by the commodity costs of displaced fuels 19 Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act, SNS 2021, c 20, section 7(b) DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 16 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of including non-utility impacts, such as fuel savings and GHG emissions, in the cost-effectiveness analysis of strategic electrification programs under the BCA. The amendment to the PUA in 2022 expanded the definition of demand-side management to include strategic electrification.

Section 60
Page 17 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence 1 • environmental impacts of DSM programs generally, including how these programs contribute to 2 reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants; 3 • encou...

AI summary The text discusses the environmental and social benefits of DSM programs, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting energy efficiency, and creating green jobs. It also outlines E1's efforts to develop a new BCA test through a competitive RFP process by retaining EFG as a consultant.

Section 64
6, 2025 Page 19 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence 1 • Session 6 - July 15, 2024: the DSMAG reviewed and discussed societal impacts beyond 2 greenhouse gases, host customer impacts, and societal non-energy...

AI summary The document outlines the steps taken by EfficiencyOne and EFG in developing the new BCA test, following the NSPM procedure. It highlights the DSMAG's involvement in reviewing societal impacts and providing feedback on the EFG report.

Section 74
smission • Distribution • General Gas Only Commodity Costs Not Included Non-Utility System Other Fuels All Not Included Host Customer All (costs and benefits) Costs Only Societal Resilience Not Included GHG Emissions Avoided Cost of Carbon...

AI summary The text outlines categories of costs and benefits considered in the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, including distribution, gas commodity costs, host customer impacts, societal resilience, GHG emissions, and public health, with some categories included and others excluded from the analysis.

Section 81
Page 29 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Evidence 1 • societal impacts (i.e., resilience, greenhouse gas emissions, other environmental and public 2 health). 3 4 These categories of N-USIs are further explained in...

AI summary The text discusses the societal impacts of EfficiencyOne's activities, including resilience, greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental and public health factors. It also outlines the impact of changes in pipeline gas consumption, fuel oil, propane, and other fuels, based on commodity prices and their inclusion in the new BCA proposed by E1.

Section 87
 fuel price volatility. Operational risk or failure of DER. Reliability Either captured under utility system reliability  or host customer resilience Resilience EE (weatherization) enables buildings to withstand outages better; DG. Distr...

AI summary The text discusses various non-energy impacts of efficiency and distributed energy resources (DER), including reliability, resilience, tax impacts, asset value, and water cost impacts. It mentions how DER can improve system reliability and customer resilience, the potential for tax incentives, and how efficiency measures can reduce water consumption.

Section 88
ost impacts Some efficiency measures also reduce water  consumption O&M costs EE and EV typically decrease. DR, DG and DS  may increase, BE may increase or decrease Productivity Many EE investments in businesses improve  productivity DATE...

AI summary The document discusses the economic, comfort, amenity, and health benefits of efficiency and demand response programs. It highlights how energy efficiency measures can reduce energy bills, improve comfort, and enhance health and safety. It also notes potential trade-offs, such as range anxiety from electric vehicles.

Section 89
"range anxiety" (cost) + avoided trips to gas stations (benefit) Health & Safety E.g., improvements to indoor air quality  Empowerment Satisfaction from ability to control energy  consumption and bills

AI summary The text discusses the impact of energy efficiency initiatives, highlighting cost savings from reduced trips to gas stations and benefits such as improved indoor air quality and increased consumer satisfaction from controlling energy consumption and bills.

Section 90
atisfaction from ability to control energy  consumption and bills Pride Satisfaction from contribution to addressing  environmental concerns 1 2 1 0 . 3 .3 SOCIETAL IMPACTS 3 Societal impact sub-categories quantify economic and environme...

AI summary The text discusses societal impacts of energy efficiency and fuel switching measures, focusing on resilience, greenhouse gas emissions, other environmental impacts, and public health. It mentions the calculation of net emissions and the application of the Federal social cost of carbon to avoid double counting.

Section 91
hour (BPK) of air quality-related public health benefits of investments in energy efficiency 19 and renewable energy as detailed by EFG. Table 9 presents the societal impacts, their description and DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 33 of 38 Ef...

AI summary The text discusses the societal impacts of energy efficiency and renewable energy investments, including resilience, greenhouse gas emissions, environmental impacts, economic development, and public health. It references Table 9, which outlines these impacts and their inclusion in the new Best Interest of Customers (BCA) framework.

Section 94
$26.1 $0 $26.1 Non-Utility System Impacts: Host $0.8 $4.8 $0.8 $4.8 $0.8 $4.8 Customer Impacts Non-Utility System $0 $0 $42.4 $0 $6.2 $0 Impacts: Other Fuels DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 35 of 38 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test A...

AI summary The document presents a benefit-cost analysis of heat pump replacements in Nova Scotia, evaluating impacts on air pollutants and GHG emissions. The analysis uses a 2% social discount rate and considers different fuel types being replaced, including electric resistance, fuel oil, and natural gas. The total net benefits and benefit-cost ratios are provided for each scenario.

Section 100
8 Board, which approves agreements between NS Power and EfficiencyOne on the level of DSM activity. 9 Q: Please describe the role of your current employer in the energy efficiency industry. 10 A: Energy Futures Group (EFG) is a clean-energ...

AI summary The testimony discusses the role of Energy Futures Group (EFG) in the energy efficiency industry, highlighting their work with regulators, utilities, and governments in designing and evaluating energy efficiency programs. EFG has contributed to efficiency programs in multiple states and provinces, including Nova Scotia.

Section 102
usetts and New York. From 2010 to 2020, I provided ongoing 17 expert review and testimony on EmPOWER Maryland’s energy efficiency portfolio on behalf of that 18 state’s Office of People’s Counsel. 19 For Nova Scotia, I served as a senior a...

AI summary David G. Hill, Ph.D., has provided expert testimony and advisory services on energy efficiency programs and infrastructure in multiple jurisdictions, including Nova Scotia, Maryland, and Ontario, with a focus on demand-side management, avoided costs, and gas infrastructure planning.

Section 103
Page 4 of 18 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix A 1 their downstate New York service territories. I was also the lead author of a study, prepared for 2 Conservation Law Foundation, which assessed critical issues...

AI summary The text outlines the professional background of an individual with experience in energy planning and regulatory proceedings, including work with various organizations and participation in expert testimony and studies related to energy infrastructure and climate action plans.

Section 104
requirements of 8 Vermont’s Global Warming Solutions Act, and leading a team conducting building sector analyses and 9 integrated scenario planning for the Massachusetts Decarbonization Roadmap. 10 Prior to joining EFG, I worked for the VE...

AI summary The individual has extensive experience in energy management and policy, with a focus on distributed energy resources, renewable energy, and energy efficiency. They have worked for organizations such as EFG and VEIC, leading large-scale programs and providing expert testimony in multiple jurisdictions.

Section 105
rgy Management and Policy Planning at the University of Pennsylvania. 26 Further details on my work experience and education are provided in my professional resume, included 27 as Attachment 1. Direct Testimony of David G. Hill, Ph.D. / Ma...

AI summary The testimony discusses the expert's experience in regulatory hearings and their recommendations for a benefit-cost analysis framework for Nova Scotia, developed in collaboration with EFG, E1, and the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG).

Section 109
Page 7 of 18 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix A

AI summary This document is an appendix to the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application. It provides supporting information for the application, though the specific content of the appendix is not detailed in the provided text.

Section 110
1 2. Review and discuss the consideration of utility system impacts in the Nova Scotia test. One 2 of the core principles of the NSPM is that to provide an accurate comparison of demand side 3 and supply side options, all utility system im...

AI summary The document discusses the consideration of utility system impacts and non-utility system impacts in the Nova Scotia test. It highlights the inclusion of avoided costs for energy, capacity, transmission, and distribution for the electric system, while gas system non-commodity impacts are not quantified. Non-utility impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutants, and host customer costs are also addressed.

Section 115
Page 11 of 18 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix A 1 4. Data Sources and Their Application in Developing the 2 Recommended BCA Framework 3 Q: What data sources and collection were used by EFG during the work with...

AI summary EFG used data from Canadian and U.S. sources, including E1 and Nova Scotia Power, in developing the recommended Nova Scotia benefit-cost analysis test framework. The National Energy Screening Project's National Standard Practice Manual was referenced for methodological guidance. Data usage is detailed in Table 3, with updates expected for the 2027-2031 DSM portfolio screening.

Section 126
conclude your direct testimony? 21 A: Yes. Direct Testimony of David G. Hill, Ph.D. / May 16, 2025. Page 16 On Behalf of EfficiencyOne DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 18 of 18 Appendix A Attachment 1: David Hill Professional Resume Efficienc...

AI summary David G. Hill, a Managing Consultant at EFG and former Director of Distributed Resources at VEIC, provides expert testimony and regulatory support in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. He has led studies on solar markets, decarbonization, and gas infrastructure investments, with experience in multiple states and countries.

Section 127
s related to gas infrastructure investments, pilot programs and planning. He has clients in more than a dozen states and six countries; several of them are international organizations. Experience January 2020 – present: Managing Consultant...

AI summary David Hill is a managing consultant at Energy Futures Group with extensive experience in energy policy, distributed energy resources, and expert testimony on renewable energy and gas infrastructure. He has provided testimony in multiple jurisdictions, including Nova Scotia, and has worked with organizations such as the Vermont Energy Investment Corporation and the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application.

Section 129
2024 Appearances on behalf of Conservation Law Foundation before the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission and Energy Facilities Siting Board in regards Rhode Island Energy’s proposed portable liquified natural gas vaporization project...

AI summary The text outlines various legal and regulatory appearances and interventions by organizations and entities in different states, focusing on energy-related matters such as rate adjustments, project approvals, and merger reviews.

Section 130
of the Attorney General, and filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Docket No.CP22-2-00, on behalf of the States of Washington, California, and Oregon. 2022 In the Matter of Avoided Costs for EfficiencyOne’s 2023-2025 Deman...

AI summary The text outlines various appearances and expert testimonies provided on behalf of different organizations and states in regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, renewable natural gas, and integrated resource planning. These appearances were before various regulatory bodies such as the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, Illinois Commerce Commission, and New Hampshire Public Service Commission.

Section 133
and analysis of energy efficiency and demand response in Dominion’s 2020 IRP. Docket No. 2019-226-E. 2019 Efficiency One 2020-2022 DSM Plan: Portfolio Diversification and Lighting Transition. Expert Witness Testimony submitted on behalf of...

AI summary This text lists various expert witness testimonies and presentations related to energy efficiency, demand response, and utility regulation, including matters involving Nova Scotia Power, Efficiency Nova Scotia, and the Office of People’s Counsel in Maryland and Pennsylvania.

Section 134
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. On behalf of the Office of Consumer Advocate, regarding Petitions of the Pennsylvania Power Company for Approval of its Act 129 Phase II Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plan (Docket Nos. M-2012-23...

AI summary The text outlines various regulatory proceedings and testimonies related to energy efficiency and conservation plans in multiple jurisdictions, including Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Ontario, with involvement from the Office of People’s Counsel and other regulatory bodies.

Section 135
ten comments) and February 17-18, 2005 (testimony). Energy Futures Group, Inc PO Box 587, Hinesburg, VT 05461 – USA 802-482-4874 [email protected] DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 3 of 9 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test App...

AI summary This document includes a professional resume of David Hill, a managing consultant with Energy Futures Group, Inc. It outlines his involvement in various regulatory proceedings in Pennsylvania and Vermont related to energy policies and standards.

Section 137
Selected Projects (from more than 100) Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. Co-leader of Vermont Pathways Analysis team providing technical support and quantitative modeling to the Vermont Climate Council, leading to adoption of Vermont Cl...

AI summary The document highlights various projects and contributions by different agencies and organizations in the fields of energy and environmental analysis. These include climate action planning, renewable gas potential assessments, and scenario modeling for greenhouse gas reduction targets.

Section 138
latory, and business model implications of getting 20 percent of Vermont’s total electric supply from solar by 2025. Sun Shares. Created and launched, and responsible for management and business development of, a community solar business s...

AI summary David Hill's professional resume highlights his extensive experience in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, including his work with Sun Shares, New Jersey Clean Energy Program, and NYSERDA. He has also provided consulting services for various energy authorities and the World Bank.

Section 140
Selected Presentations 2017 Sun Shares, Easy and Affordable Solar for Employers and their Employees, American Solar Energy Society, Solar 2017, Denver. 2017 Vermont Solar Market Pathways, American Solar Energy Society, Solar 2017, Denver....

AI summary The text lists various presentations and speaking engagements related to energy efficiency, renewable energy, and solar markets, including events such as the American Solar Energy Society, Solar 2017, and the World Bank International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Cities.

Section 141
Efficiency Services. Presentation to the Clean Energy States Alliance Fall 2011 Meeting, Washington, DC. 2010 The Potential for Energy Efficiency and Renewables as Resources in Wholesale Capacity Markets, Presentation at EUEC 2010 Conferen...

AI summary The text lists various presentations and publications by David Hill, a managing consultant at Energy Futures Group, Inc., focusing on energy efficiency and renewable energy topics. It includes details on his professional experience and contact information.

Section 143
2005 Market Response to Photovoltaic Incentive Offerings: An Analysis of Trends and Indicators. Presented at the International Solar Energy Society Solar World Congress, 2005. 2003 Solar Energy Value and Opportunities in Vermont, Invited S...

AI summary The text lists various presentations and publications related to renewable energy, solar energy, and energy efficiency, focusing on case studies, market responses, and software tools developed for evaluating energy efficiency and renewable energy opportunities.

Section 147
2009 “Carbon Regulation: What’s the Most Effective Path?” Solar Today. June 2009. 2009 “Policy Recommendations for the 111th Congress: Tackling Climate Change and Creating a Green Economy.” Prepared by the American Solar Energy Society Pol...

AI summary The document contains a list of references and publications related to energy efficiency, solar energy, and climate change policy from various years. These include reports, proceedings, and policy recommendations focusing on energy efficiency, renewable energy, and climate action plans.

Section 148
Young). 1998 Eco-Efficiency Financing Resource Directory. Electronic web-site, and printed directory prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, New England. Regulatory and Other Governmental / NGO Documents 2000 – 2012 New...

AI summary The text outlines various energy efficiency and clean energy initiatives undertaken by an individual from 1997 to 2012, including work with government agencies, NGOs, and international organizations on programs such as renewable energy plans, climate action, and energy efficiency strategies.

Section 151
1996 Evaluation of the IDB's Policies and Practices in Support of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency: A Report to the Inter-American Development Bank. Brower and Company and Tellus Institute. 1996 Action Plan for the Massachusetts' Ind...

AI summary This section lists various reports and studies conducted between 1994 and 1996 on energy policies, renewable energy, and efficiency initiatives, including evaluations and reviews for different regions and organizations.

Section 152
ental Externalities in Energy Decisions: A Guide for Energy Planners. A Report to the Swedish International Development Agency. SEI-B Report No. 91-157. Leadership 2017 – 2019 Energy Coop of Vermont, Board Member and Treasurer. 2013 Solar...

AI summary David Hill's professional resume outlines his extensive experience in energy planning, renewable energy advocacy, and leadership roles in various energy-related organizations. He holds a Ph.D. in Energy Management and Policy Planning and has been actively involved in energy policy and sustainability initiatives over several decades.

Section 155
Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual

AI summary This document is an appendix to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, which includes Attachment 2 referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the procedural and analytical framework for evaluating energy efficiency programs.

Section 156
01234567897 73 ÿ ÿÿ  ÿ   ÿ!"ÿ# ÿ$#%&'ÿ()''ÿ#ÿ ' +" ÿ, -)ÿ.'" 'ÿ/0123ÿ45ÿ67ÿ 89:;9<=ÿÿ9ÿ>;?<@964:ÿ4Aÿ67ÿ0964:9<ÿB:75CDÿ1@577::Cÿ254E7@6ÿ/0B12=Fÿ7ÿ0B12ÿÿ57>577:67Gÿ?Dÿ9ÿ69H74 ÿ4Aÿ45C9:...

AI summary The document discusses the 01234567897 73 ÿ and its implications on regulatory processes, including the role of various entities and the use of specific methodologies and standards. It references topics such as energy efficiency, demand-side management, and regulatory compliance.

Section 157
‰ 18956ÿB<7@65@ÿ24K75ÿ{<<9:@7ÿŠÿ˜967ÿ165@H<9:Gÿ9:Gÿx57:G9ÿy7K 7ÿ254E7@6ÿK9ÿ@445G:967Gÿ?Dÿš;<7ÿ3@9<ÿ96ÿBU7T;6;57SÿK6ÿ;>>456ÿA548ÿ{<9:9ÿx4D<7Fÿ7ÿ89:;9<ÿK9ÿ 7G67Gÿ?Dÿš;<7ÿ3@9<ÿ9:Gÿ8ÿ‹44 54E7@6ÿ6798ÿK4; 75>7@6J7ÿ...

AI summary The document lists various entities involved in a regulatory proceeding, including organizations and individuals, and references a Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and the National Standard Practice Manual. It appears to be part of a proceeding related to energy efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Section 166
DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 4 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ 1234ÿ6667ÿÿ89 964 4ÿ2 26ÿ3ÿÿ1966ÿ93ÿ419ÿ ÿ 9 93ÿ9 669 ÿ393 9ÿ...

AI summary The document is an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures for conducting a benefit-cost analysis, which is a key part of regulatory proceedings.

Section 171
DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 5 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ 1123ÿ4567ÿ689 ÿ4 745ÿ875487ÿ7478ÿ9ÿ222222222222222222222222...

AI summary The document is an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs and regulations.

Section 177
DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 6 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ 12234567ÿ39ÿ 156641ÿ 336343ÿ3ÿ9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999...

AI summary The document includes an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses the application of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings, indicating a focus on evaluating the economic impact of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 190
9999999999999999999999999999ÿ 7%ÿ 12345ÿ 789ÿ52ÿÿ#55 "ÿ2ÿ#ÿ$25ÿ9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999ÿ 7,ÿ 12345ÿ-7 9ÿ 5ÿ+24 ÿ.ÿ8&ÿ55ÿ (5ÿ4ÿ...

AI summary This document is an appendix to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding, likely involving the evaluation of energy efficiency programs.

Section 200
ÿ lmÿ ,-O S).ÿ-Uo)N0 O)hÿ VPSÿ0)N(P-W-TXMP)+0,VWhÿ 78 ÿQkflmÿ/-,ÿ]]R_ÿY-0(ÿS-N+ )P0.ÿV,)ÿ ,-S+N0.ÿ-/ÿ0()ÿ VP Sÿ )N-P - NVWWXÿ.-+PSÿ kV0 -PVWÿ]P),TXÿfN,))P PTÿl,-o)N0ÿQk]flRhÿVÿ̀+W0 MX)V,ÿ)//-,0ÿ T+ S)SÿUXÿVPÿVSO .-,XÿT,-+ ÿ,) ,).)P0)Sÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test by EfficiencyOne, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures for evaluating efficiency programs and their impact on energy use and costs.

Section 201
@7:@ÿ:A>ÿBC99C;=?ÿ<8>DÿE @7 ;ÿ@7>ÿ>=>B@A B @?ÿ:;DÿF:8ÿ ;D<8@A >8GÿH>?ÿ @>A98ÿ:A>ÿD>I ;>Dÿ ;ÿ:ÿJ=C88:A?ÿ:;Dÿ ;ÿA>=>K:;@ÿ8>B@ C;8ÿCIÿ@7>ÿ9:;<:=GÿLC9>ÿCIÿ@7>ÿ@>A98ÿ<8>Dÿ ;ÿ@7>ÿ 9:;<:=ÿ:A>ÿ9CA>ÿMAC:D=?ÿD>I ;>Dÿ@7:;ÿ ;ÿC@7>Aÿ:NN= B:@ C;8Oÿ:8ÿ;C...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility services in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as cost recovery, fuel adjustment mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement. It references various regulatory processes and considerations for energy efficiency and affordability.

Section 204
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 14 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ! ÿ "#$%#&'ÿ('...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of the @ABC DEF, including its implementation, impact on stakeholders, and considerations related to energy efficiency programs and regulatory processes.

Section 205
"4&ÿ$"ÿ +%, -%&<./0ÿ("(%1' '6ÿT,ÿ(332&''&'ÿ,8&ÿ,82&&ÿ ( "ÿ=(1'ÿ,8(,ÿ +%, -%&<./0ÿ("(%1' 'ÿ 'ÿ4$"3+4,&3Rÿ5$2ÿ(ÿ4+',$ &2ÿ' ,&Zÿ5$2ÿ(ÿ)&$)2(-8 4ÿ2&) $"Zÿ("3ÿ5$2ÿ("ÿ &", 2&ÿ+, % ,1ÿ'&2# 4&ÿ,&22 ,$216ÿB(2,ÿTYÿ(%'$ÿ(332&''&'9ÿ(,ÿ(ÿ8 )8ÿ%&#&%9ÿ31...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding, focusing on the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis (ABC) and its application in evaluating DEF. It references the use of DEF in assessing programs and policies related to energy efficiency and cost-benefit analysis within the context of regulatory oversight.

Section 206
55&2&",ÿ ,$ÿ "5$2 ÿW(Xÿ,8&ÿ-2 $2 , :(, $"ÿ$5ÿ4$',<&55&4, #&ÿ./0'9ÿ „A>'ÿ5$2ÿ3 55&2&",ÿˆ+2 '3 4, $"'6ÿ ('ÿ3&,&2 "&3ÿ;1ÿ(ÿ-2 (21ÿ„A>9ÿ("3ÿW;Xÿ3&4 ' $"'ÿ (2$+"3ÿ (2) "(%%1ÿ"$"<4$',<&55&4, #&ÿ./0'6ÿ fJIlHgPIOHKÿdMeÿ]nIonmKPQÿÿ >8&ÿ@ABCÿ-2$# 3&...

AI summary The text references the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis (ABC) and its application in evaluating DEF, which is related to energy efficiency programs. The analysis focuses on the impact of these programs and their alignment with regulatory standards and practices outlined in the National Standard Practice Manual.

Section 207
! ÿ.4.1!2ÿ+!!>.7ÿ _ a.ÿ.03->ÿ1! !<0 !ÿ:!ÿ,02)/ !>ÿ; 1ÿ01! ÿ!+! 64ÿ !.03 ,!.9ÿ +,-3> +6ÿ01! ÿ_ a.9ÿ3. +6ÿ ,0+. .1!+1ÿ2!10>.ÿ/+>ÿ/..32)1 0+.ÿ10ÿ/ 0 >ÿ: /.ÿ/, 0..ÿ !.03 ,!ÿ + !.12!+1ÿ>!, . 0+.7ÿ KPQRSQTCDÿcÿ OCQdRÿeQVfÿK]CQS[ÿg]ACUÿ h3 .> ,1...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the role of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis (ABC) in assessing program effectiveness. It also references regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms.

Section 210
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 16 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"##ÿ% ÿ&"'"() +,ÿ-ÿ .- /ÿ01...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application's focus on energy efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives. The text also references a test application and the structure of the analysis.

Section 211
ALxCBLGACKÿ>GKLHL9@YÿZBLKLBFÿ?9@GZ?H9ÿ>KCAALAMÿ>?LAHL>K9@ÿCAJÿ>GKLHL9@YÿCAJyG?ÿGB89?ÿ HGJLIL9JÿIG?N@ÿZAJ9?ÿ_8LH8ÿZBLKLBL9@ÿG?ÿ9A9?MFÿ>?G LJ9?@ÿG>9?CB9Rÿ zLMZ?9ÿ;D^ÿLKKZ@B?CB9@ÿB89ÿ?9MZKCBG?Fÿ>9?@>9HBL 9ÿ?9KCBL 9ÿBGÿB?CJLBLGACKÿHG@BD9II9HBL...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving efficiency programs and cost analyses, referencing the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis and other unspecified matters. It touches on topics like cost recovery, energy efficiency, and regulatory compliance.

Section 213
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 17 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ +,+-./012ÿ3ÿ456078...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects including benefit-cost analysis, program evaluation, and considerations related to energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 217
09>7<ÿD1ÿ>81<ÿ@6>C 9>87BÿC9ÿ1?8>;1ÿC06CÿC01Bÿ<9ÿ?9CÿE6p1ÿC01ÿ qrsÿC18C8ÿ1f=fdÿC01ÿ/9C67ÿ qrsÿ<1@ 8 9?FE6p ?=ÿ:;9@188ÿD>;<1?89E1ÿ9;ÿ>?<1;E ?1ÿC01ÿ J189>;@1ÿr98CÿC18Cf†ÿ :>;:981ÿ9GÿC01ÿ:; E6;BÿC18Cfÿ ÿ t%&.ÿuuvÿwxyÿ)#z{.-ÿ%#$ÿ "-.-ÿ%#$ÿ &" }...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy costs and the implementation of efficiency measures, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the evaluation of programs such as demand-side management. It references the impact of regulatory decisions on fuel cost adjustments and energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 219
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 19 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ./0ÿ1234+5...

AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs and includes various technical terms and procedures related to the evaluation of such programs.

Section 220
BJ C@ÿÿ QBL=S@ÿB =S BRS@ÿ E>B J C@ÿD>ÿ?BQÿSDQCÿCF>DI?FÿCF=ÿC>B RIC D<ÿTBGBJ C@ÿ \B RIC D<ÿQ@QC=KÿCDÿC>B Cÿ=S=JC> J C@ÿD>ÿ ?BQÿQBL=S@ÿB =S BRS@ÿ .-5+7-!^+- ,ÿ _ QC> RIC D<ÿZ@QC=Kÿ]DQQ=Qÿ ;S=JC> J C@ÿSDQCÿCF>DI?FÿCF=ÿH QC> RIC D<ÿQ@QC=Kÿ _ Q...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and program evaluations, including the role of the Board in managing fuel costs, efficiency programs, and stakeholder engagement in regulatory processes.

Section 227
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 21 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ8ÿ 7ÿ ! "ÿ#$%%&'() %ÿ+...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs and includes references to regulatory standards and procedures.

Section 229
2& &1ÿ ÿ $% )71ÿ(=ÿ1'%ÿ,&,7; 2 <ÿA'2 ÿ5'(25%ÿ '()70ÿ?%ÿ+)20%0ÿ $%7%@,&1ÿ234,51 <ÿ EFÿHIJÿKLMNOPNQHNRSTOÿUVVWNQUEWJÿVRWNQFÿXRUWOÿUSPÿHIJÿ ÿ $%+)7,1($;ÿ4%$ 4%512@%<ÿ YZ[\ÿ^^^_ÿ̀abÿcd[ÿefghicihÿjklÿmnfgoÿÿ ÿp,$1ÿqqqÿ(=ÿ1'%ÿrsptÿ5(&1,2& ÿ=2@%ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of the 89: program and its impact on the 234,51 theme, including the 89: 1;4% and related 99u 8:u 8#u 8su. It references 02 5) and 2&02@20),7, and mentions the 89: 1;4% and 89: 1;4% 5(@%$%0.

Section 231
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 22 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ.#,#/-+0ÿ,...

AI summary The document is an appendix from a regulatory proceeding, referencing an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and a National Standard Practice Manual. It includes placeholders and formatting that suggest it is part of a larger filing or submission.

Section 240
]^=ÿ>CÿYZ[=ÿ BD?@P W Bÿ< =A BOÿ>GÿB I OGEI=Uÿ Aÿ =ÿDG A DE?ÿA>ÿ EDD@GEA<?NÿC>G I BÿEBPÿEP>JA >BUÿA>ÿG CÿB>AÿI< @?PÿR<ÿEDD>@BA GUÿ BD?@P BOÿ BÿEQ> P =A=Uÿ BÿHZ;ÿ >GÿHZÿ IJEDA=UÿEBPÿ OGEJ; DE??NÿP N ÿP EP BÿA;<ÿ@A ? ANÿ =N=A P BÿDEJED ANÿD>=...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It also includes a date filed and page number from a document, indicating the context of a regulatory proceeding.

Section 241
t Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ UVWXYZ[]ÿ_VàbZVWÿcd]\ÿ_baefÿg]]ahibZVW]ÿ O+ÿ-! .ÿ" #$%&"5ÿ#+ÿ"&"0-6 0ÿ3- & -4ÿ .ÿ,#0 +;ÿ-!"ÿ+""/ÿ-1ÿ3%;6#/"ÿ -.ÿ.4.-"$ÿ +,6#.-630-36"ÿ/3"ÿ-1ÿ/ .-6 3- 1+ÿ 0#%#...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the National Standard Practice Manual in a regulatory proceeding, focusing on the analysis of test applications and the evaluation of various procedures related to energy efficiency and cost management. It addresses topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, regulatory compliance, and the role of efficiency programs in utility planning.

Section 242
ÿ/ .-6 3- 1+ÿ1,,<%"#Hÿ!136.ÿ#+/ÿ/ .0!#6;".ÿ/36 +;ÿ-!"ÿ/ .-6 3- 1+ÿ%"#Hÿ!136.>ÿ ŽÿEGÿ6"/30".ÿ/"$#+/ÿ/36 +;ÿ/ .-6 3- 1+ÿ%"#Hÿ%"6 1/.ÿ#+/16ÿ.! ,-.ÿ&1#/ÿ,61$ÿ/ .-6 3- 1+ÿ%"#Hÿ%"6 1/.ÿ-1ÿ / .-6 3- 1+ÿ1,,<%"#Hÿ%"6 1/.>ÿ ŽÿE .-6 3-"/ÿJKÿ6".1360"...

AI summary The document discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency and cost management in Nova Scotia, including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and regulatory compliance. It references various legal and procedural matters and mentions entities involved in these proceedings.

Section 249
,#ÿ ,((#.,20ÿ2."-6ÿ7$ÿ")$6ÿ+.ÿ (# .# + =$ÿ>?5)ÿ71ÿ+0$ #ÿ 7$ $/ +&2.)+ÿ#,+ .)@ÿ.#ÿ+.ÿ (# .# + =$ÿ345)ÿ/.#ÿ; +0 ÿ,ÿ ! $ ÿ#,+$ÿ :(,2+ÿ2,(8ÿÿ A ÿ).:$ÿ2,)$)@ÿ,ÿ B"# )6 2+ . ÿ:,1ÿ(#$/$#ÿ+.ÿ $)+ÿ ÿ,ÿ6 $#)$ÿ#, !$ÿ./ÿ 345ÿ+1($)ÿ. ÿ+0$ÿ7,) )ÿ +0,+ÿ,...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation and impact of the 345 program, highlighting its role in energy efficiency and the challenges related to its integration and effectiveness. It emphasizes the need for alignment between program goals and operational practices.

Section 250
+1($ÿ./ÿ3458ÿ90 )ÿ2."-6ÿ7$ÿ,20 $ $6ÿ71ÿ).#+ !ÿ+0$ÿ345ÿ+1($)ÿ71ÿ $+ÿ7$ $/ +)ÿ.#ÿ7$ $/ +&2.)+ÿ#,+ .)ÿ, 6ÿ )$-$2+ !ÿ+0$ÿ-.;$)+ÿ2.)+ÿ.(+ . )ÿ/.#ÿ$,20ÿ+1($ÿ./ÿ3458ÿ DEFGHIJÿLEMNOHÿPQGFFIFRÿ S+ - + $)ÿ0, $ÿ2. 6"2+$6ÿ+#,6 + . ,-ÿ6 )+# 7"+ . ÿ)1)+...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, highlighting its impact on base rates and the need for alignment with actual costs. It also touches on the role of efficiency programs and regulatory oversight in managing energy resources and ensuring equitable outcomes.

Section 252
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 28 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'()ÿ +$,ÿ-.ÿ/ 0!123ÿ&...

AI summary The text outlines an application for a benefit-cost analysis test under EfficiencyOne, referencing an attachment from the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses procedural aspects related to the test application and includes references to various sections and standards.

Section 253
?TUÿ]EBÿO @AB CDA EFGHK KHÿQHMFF FNÿ EFHIÿMFOÿ FAKNBMAKOÿNB OÿQHMFF FNÿSR^TUÿ]EBÿ]DHHG@I@AKWÿQHMFF FN\ÿ 9++$0_23$,ÿ PMCHKÿ̀Gabÿ@DWWMB ZK@ÿAYKÿMQQKFO LK@ÿAYMAÿQBE OKÿ]DBAYKBÿOKAM HÿEFÿ@EWKÿc TdÿAEQ L@ÿAYMAÿeMBBMFAÿ MOO A EFMHÿK QHMFMA EF\ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of energy management and regulatory processes, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and the role of entities like EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power. It references legal and regulatory frameworks and includes discussions on cost recovery and policy implementation.

Section 254
ÿCEAYÿMÿCKFK] AÿAEÿEFKÿ MLA@ÿ QMBAIÿMFOÿMÿLE@AÿAEÿMFEAYKBÿQMBAIjÿAYKBKCIÿLMFLKHH FNÿKMLYÿEAYKBÿEDAÿ iQQKFO ÿ^ÿ ? @LEDFAÿXMAK@ÿ ?K@LB CK@ÿeMI@ÿAEÿOKAKBW FKÿO @LEDFAÿBMAK@ÿAYMAÿMBKÿLEF@ @AKFAÿe AYÿ rstÿvwxyz{y ry}~zÿ€‚y €ƒ‚tÿ}‚y „ÿ}€‚zÿ...

AI summary The document references an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and mentions the National Standard Practice Manual as an attachment. It includes a date filed and page number, indicating it is part of a larger regulatory proceeding.

Section 257
ÿEFÿ;I=>@<;= >ÿ EQ= E =>@D <>ÿJG>=G>@ÿ=G>ÿH><>F =Bÿ> L>>Aÿ=G>ÿLEB=BÿE >@ÿ=G>ÿI F>= D>ÿEFÿ=G>ÿQ@E?@;DÿE@ÿQ@E€>L=ÿ M @ÿLE @;= E >ÿ_>L= E<ÿN‚NZÿ q-4/ÿ ) 1\ ƒ-Pÿ AÿE<ÿ;LL>Q=;HI>ÿB=; I ;H I =Cÿ; I> ; ÿ; >@K@> >J>AÿJG><ÿ;QQ@EQ@ ;=>ÿ; nM @>ARÿ;...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and their impact on rate structures, including the role of efficiency programs and regulatory considerations. It references regulatory proceedings, cost recovery, and the evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 259
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 30 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !" !#ÿ "$% &$'(ÿ) ÿ+,-.,!/'ÿ...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and its attachment related to the National Standard Practice Manual. It mentions the use of benefit-cost analysis in energy efficiency programs and references various positions and practices within the regulatory process.

Section 260
ÿ1$/!1ÿ-,ÿ+,-& 1$ÿ'0++#3ÿ%-ÿ'!% ' 3ÿ%5$ÿ$$,.38ÿ"!+!" %38ÿ-,ÿ!" ##!,3ÿ'$,& "$ÿ$$1'ÿ- ÿ%5$ÿ., 1ÿ :)l<ÿ>?@m!(ÿn5$'$ÿ "#01$ÿ<<8ÿ1$/!1ÿ,$'+-'$8ÿ1 '%, 20%$1ÿ.$$,!% -8ÿ'%-,!.$8ÿ+#0.6 ÿ$#$"%, "ÿ &$5 "#$'8ÿ'%,!%$. "ÿ$#$"%, "!% -ÿ%$"5-#-. $'8ÿ!1ÿ/-,...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs and regulatory processes in Nova Scotia, including the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives, the role of the Building Code Division, and the use of benefit-cost analyses. It also touches on topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and the impact of regulatory decisions on energy programs.

Section 263
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 31 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%$!&"$'()ÿ +,-./0.1ÿ.2.,...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs, including the role of the Building Code Division and Nova Scotia Power. The document includes procedural details and references to specific applications and practices.

Section 264
: ,:ÿ/-.ÿ3 /0.0ÿ3:/3ÿ3-/Jÿ:./3ÿ +ÿ3:.ÿ/3=50J:.-.ÿK +,271 +>ÿ,/-;5+ÿ1 5 1.8ÿ =.3:/+.8ÿ+ 3-570ÿ5 1.8ÿ/+1ÿ4275- +/3.1ÿ>/0.0Lÿ.= 33.1ÿ4-5=ÿ:7=/+ÿ/,3 R 3 .08ÿJ- =/- 2<ÿ;7-+ +>ÿ4500 2ÿ 47.20ÿ45-ÿ.2.,3- , 3<ÿ>.+.-/3 5+8ÿ3-/+0J5-3/3 5+8ÿ +1703- /2...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy efficiency programs, including the role of the Building Code Division and EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis in assessing program effectiveness. It touches on topics like energy efficiency, compliance, and the evaluation of energy programs in Nova Scotia.

Section 267
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 32 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%!&ÿ'()ÿ )+ ,-ÿ.,/)+ 01ÿ...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis and compliance with standards. The document also mentions the application of the =>? framework and the use of standardized practices in energy efficiency evaluations.

Section 268
).'+ . '5ÿ80-ÿ186ÿ+)6,3+.)6@ÿ 0.43- 01ÿ=>?6@ÿ.80ÿ7)ÿ 3'ÿ 0',ÿ 4)/)4 9)-ÿ.,6'6ÿ',ÿ844,Hÿ2,+ÿ8ÿ+)48' /)45ÿ6 A 4)@ÿ- +).'ÿ.,A 8+ 6,0ÿ8.+,66ÿ- 22)+)0'ÿ+)6,3+.)6:ÿÿ sLCE$TLoÿTJKLMCB&ÿ A 8.'6ÿ'(8'ÿ8+)ÿ) ).')-ÿ',ÿ7)ÿ,2ÿ6322 . )0'ÿA810 '3-)ÿ',ÿ822...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives. It references the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis and Nova Scotia Power, emphasizing the importance of cost-effectiveness and program evaluation in the regulatory process.

Section 270
ÿ5/0F15ÿ0F/0ÿ/ÿO75 4- .0 8,ÿ/33: 14ÿ0F1ÿGHIJÿPQRÿS5/21985Tÿ08ÿ51L 19ÿ 04ÿ 1 40 ,6ÿ38: . 14ÿ08ÿ-1L1:83ÿ/ÿ.840N1;;1.0 L1,144ÿ0140ÿ9F .Fÿ51;:1.04ÿ:8./:ÿ38: .Mÿ[email protected] L14Aÿ !#) !Cÿ$& "UDVVD$"#WD'D ÿ"D "+ÿ0F1ÿ.840N1;;1.0 L1,144ÿ0140ÿ0F/0ÿ/ÿO75...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of the O75 mechanism on fuel-cost-adjustment and its influence on rate structures, including concerns about incentives and cost recovery. It also mentions regulatory considerations related to efficiency programs and compliance with standards.

Section 274
_9947; ÿ̀ESÿ H%X)F%H#X!OIÿ.ÿQ4Dÿ9: 7/ 9A4ÿ@<4:4CDÿ/01234554/2 647411ÿ9:./2 /41ÿ5BAADÿ;0/BM472ÿ.AAÿ:4A46.72ÿ 79B218ÿ .11BM92 0718ÿM42<0;0A0N 418ÿ.7;ÿ:41BA21EÿRU44ÿ_9947; ÿ^ÿ.7;ÿ_9947; ÿJÿ50:ÿ:4/0MM47;4;ÿ24M9A.241ÿ .7;ÿ:490:2 7Nÿ50:M.21ESÿ a...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving cost recovery mechanisms, fuel adjustment, and energy efficiency programs. It references various proceedings, including the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis and Nova Scotia Power, and touches on topics such as demand-side management and regulatory oversight.

Section 275
52@.:4ÿ.7;ÿ.;6.7/4;ÿ/0MMB7 /.2 07ÿ 1D124M1ÿ2<.2ÿ.NN:4N.248ÿ/072:0A8ÿ; 19.2/<8ÿ.7;s0:ÿ9A.7ÿ;49A0DM472ÿ20ÿ9:06 ;4ÿ14:6 /41ÿ1 M A.:ÿ20ÿ.ÿ /076472 07.Aÿ90@4:ÿ9A.72EÿRU44ÿV<.924:ÿ?=ESÿÿ ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ ÿÿ D...

AI summary The document is an appendix to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing an Attachment 2 titled 'National Standard Practice Manual' and filed on May 16, 2025. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding.

Section 278
QMÿ 7 B<4ÿ8H / B/< -ÿ P'ÿ \ ./4 K3/,+ÿ./ 4<>,ÿ "L!ÿ ,5,C Fÿ-4,+ /ÿ P'Qÿ \ ./4 K3/ 5ÿ.F./,=ÿ8B<55 5>ÿ ";&ÿ </,ÿa=8<-/ÿR,<.34,ÿ:,./ÿ LLÿ b5,4>Fÿ,99 - ,5-Fÿ "Q'ÿ ,5,C 5 <5 N</ 5ÿ LMÿ bB,-/4 -ÿ ,H -B,ÿ '!1ÿ 7 - ,/ H/.ÿ 1WPÿÿ :4<5.= .. 5ÿ<5+ÿ+...

AI summary The document is part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia, involving topics such as efficiency programs, benefit-cost analysis, and regulatory processes. It includes references to various regulatory matters and standards.

Section 279
Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ

AI summary This document is an appendix to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, including Attachment 2 which references the National Standard Practice Manual. It is part of a regulatory proceeding involving EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power.

Section 284
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 37 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ#$%&'()'ÿ+(%ÿ,'-.&(/0/12ÿ...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs and includes considerations related to the application and evaluation of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 288
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 38 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%& 'ÿ$()ÿ&% ÿ'%$+ &#) '...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines key considerations for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including the importance of accurate cost-benefit analysis, program design, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 289
'ÿ6(% '%)ÿ6(ÿ8&%(%6$#ÿ $%ÿ628$4%'ÿ1 &2ÿ9:;'ÿ4$(ÿ$#'&ÿ4&()"4%ÿ $%=ÿ06##=ÿ$()ÿ8$ %6468$%6&(ÿ $($#3'',ÿR 'ÿ$($#3''ÿ2$3ÿ0ÿ"'1"#ÿ1& ÿ6(1& 26(!ÿ)46'6&('ÿ !$ )6(!ÿ"%6#6%3ÿ6(7'%2 (%ÿ6(ÿ& ÿ'"88& %ÿ &1ÿ9:;'ÿ$()ÿ4$(ÿ0ÿ4&28#2 (%$ 3ÿ%&ÿ-./',ÿ;$%ÿ628$4%...

AI summary This text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding, focusing on the impact of the 9:; mechanism on energy efficiency and cost recovery. It references various regulatory processes, including fuel-cost-adjustment and prudency reviews, and outlines the need for stakeholder engagement and compliance with energy efficiency standards.

Section 299
Aÿ9GEÿEN=DN;8MÿY;<Fÿ<FEÿ;8PGE9AE:ÿCAEÿ=Oÿ 9:N98PE:ÿKE<EG;8Mÿ98:ÿ:9<9ÿ989D[<;PABÿX=<Fÿ9AA=P;9<E:ÿY;<Fÿ9ÿMG=Y;8MÿO=PCAÿ=8ÿHIJAÿLG=N;:;8Mÿ:EK98:ÿ ODE];X;D;<[ÿN9DCEÿ;8ÿ<EGKAÿ=Oÿ<EKL=G9Dÿ98:ÿD=P9<;=89Dÿ;KL9P<AÿQdIIÿ@P<;=8ÿefef9UVÿ WFEÿndoRÿ;Aÿ9...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving efficiency programs and energy management, referencing a benefit-cost analysis and a demand-side management plan. It also mentions a specific acronym related to a building code division and a Nova Scotia Power initiative.

Section 306
OEÿCJLÿAKQEÿPOQNMQQFQÿCÿXCGOFEdÿKSÿOQQMFQÿCJLÿNKJQOLFGCEOKJQÿEBCEÿQDCJÿQFXFGCUÿKSÿEBFÿ RFJFSOEQÿCJLÿNKQEQÿUOQEFLÿOJÿABCDEFGÿtÿ 6+0ÿ[[[ÿ 4@#7,/,7ÿ:;<ÿ ^@#=ÿxÿ\?]ÿ[==9#=ÿ35ÿy9,537#ÿ ABCDEFGÿzÿ uJFGgdÿuSSONOFJNdÿvFQKMGNFQÿ ABCDEFGÿ€ÿ PFTCJLÿv...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving various aspects of energy management, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, efficiency programs, and regulatory processes. It includes references to proceedings, entities, and technical terms related to energy policy and regulation.

Section 318
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 47 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +,-#+."ÿ/012ÿ345...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of benefit-cost analysis, including the application of standards, evaluation methods, and considerations for different types of projects and programs.

Section 319
SÿVIOUNSGÿEUUÿFGUG[EIPÿwEOOHFSVIMÿPHÿETTUVOERUGÿTHUVOLÿMHEUDxZÿKEPGFVEUÿ VKTEOPDÿVIOUNSVIMÿPQHDGÿPQEPÿEFGÿSVJJVONUPÿPHÿyNEIPVJLÿHFÿKHIGPVzGYÿÿ 167+879"#ÿ{ÿ 4@+, 8.ÿ)@6] 6,& @@}7+\tÿ @+\&.#6-tÿu+86#-#+."ÿ5+"?:#:ÿ vHDPcGJJGOPV[GIGDDÿEIEULDGD...

AI summary The text discusses the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its impact on rates, the integration of renewable energy resources, and the evaluation of various programs and policies related to energy efficiency and affordability. It also references regulatory processes and compliance with legislation.

Section 321
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 48 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#! $%ÿ'ÿ) % )ÿ+%,ÿ ,ÿ ÿ-)...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the application of standard practices for assessing program effectiveness.

Section 326
67ÿ/"!-ÿ%)!-"#$ ÿ +#2&%-!ÿB$ÿ&%%")-$,ÿ1" 'ÿ" ÿ& $ÿ!+3$-ÿ"ÿ-/+!ÿ- $&-#$-'ÿ-/$ÿ $4)3&-" !ÿ%&ÿ,$-$ #+$ÿ@+-/ÿ !-&F$/"3,$ ÿ+2)-ÿ@/$-/$ ÿ-"ÿ+%3),$ÿ/"!-ÿ%)!-"#$ ÿ+#2&%-!'ÿ&!ÿ3"4ÿ&!ÿ-/$ÿ- $&-#$-ÿ1" ÿ-/$ÿ%"!-!ÿ&,ÿ -/$ÿB$$1+-!ÿ+!ÿ%"!+!-$-ÿ&,ÿ!.##$-...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving the management of costs and the implementation of policies related to energy efficiency and affordability. It references specific mechanisms, such as fuel-cost-adjustment and rate design, and touches on the evaluation of programs and their impact on customers.

Section 327
ÿ567ÿ+#2&%-!ÿ-/&-ÿ& $ÿ,$$#$,ÿ-"ÿB$ÿ $3$0&-ÿ&,ÿ#&-$ +&3ÿ!/")3,ÿB$ÿ&%%")-$,ÿ1" ÿ+ÿ%"!-Y $11$%-+0$$!!ÿ-$!-!8ÿ;/$ÿ $3$0&-'ÿ#&-$ +&3ÿ+#2&%-!ÿ!/")3,ÿ+,$&33.ÿB$ÿ$!-+#&-$,ÿ+ÿ#"$-& .ÿ-$ #!ÿ!"ÿ -/&-ÿ-/$.ÿ%&ÿB$ÿ2)-ÿ+-"ÿ)!$1)3ÿE>Dÿ#$- +%!'ÿ!)%/ÿ&!ÿ-/$...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving a fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, efficiency programs, and the application of a benefit-cost analysis test. It references a National Standard Practice Manual and mentions the role of E>D in energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 337
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 52 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$!%"&'ÿ!(#)ÿ%" !+(#ÿ%"#,...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses, including considerations for standard practice and methodology in assessing efficiency programs.

Section 347
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 55 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ ÿ!"# ÿ4 8ÿ$!4%ÿ&'...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It involves the evaluation of efficiency programs and their impact on cost-benefit analysis, including the use of specific methodologies and standards.

Section 349
1ÿ.,-ÿ 6Qu0+/ <01@ÿD)0ÿ20F73./625ÿ>021>0+/ <0ÿ+673-ÿ/)0620/ +.335ÿ.3 F,ÿ 2F068.3031+ÿ//1)ÿ../ÿjÿk+.lm,nÿoQm0pqÿ.mr2s/ t+n7ÿ.3.>/>03- +ÿ. ,Qÿ30ÿ ( /)ÿ.ÿ/2.- / 6,.3ÿ/01/ÿ>021>0+/ <0'ÿ/)67F)ÿ 1ÿ=620ÿ3 4035ÿ/6ÿQ0ÿ - 88020,/ÿ(.51'ÿ ,+37- ,FÿQ7/...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility matters, focusing on the 2027-2031 Demand-Side Management Preferred Resource Plan, energy efficiency, and the role of the Board in oversight and compliance. It mentions the evaluation of programs and their impact on customers, as well as regulatory processes.

Section 353
ÿ Kÿ<;;>NCE9ÿ7 Eÿ=>ÿ= 8ÿC=Aÿ@8CM<8?ÿ=7A=ÿ=>ÿ87K;7B=ÿC=Aÿ >NEÿ9><;Aÿ LF7B=CD7AOÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 57 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Applicat...

AI summary This document outlines an efficiency benefit-cost analysis test application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes various sections related to the evaluation and analysis of efficiency programs and their associated costs and benefits.

Section 354
QOQPnKÿPndÿpPKQJLPOÿLp^PMKcÿPJQÿLnMONdQdqÿQQnÿLoÿRPJdÿK ÿ†NPnKLoahÿ {ÿ rQnQoLKcÿPndÿM cKcÿPJQÿn Kÿd N_OQwM NnKQdhÿ {ÿ rQnQoLKcÿPndÿM cKcÿPJQÿKJQPKQdÿM ncLcKQnKOaÿPMJ ccÿefgÿKa^Qchÿ D F;ÿCÿF?@!"-?uÿ‚+=,<#u#.?- #‡ÿ <.?,<#.@ÿ)+EG=#.@@-+.ÿ fcK...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving energy efficiency programs, fuel cost adjustments, and legal frameworks. It references legislative acts and regulatory processes, including compliance and stakeholder engagement. Key topics include energy efficiency, affordability, and regulatory oversight.

Section 357
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 58 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&'ÿ() ÿ +(, (%. & ++ÿ-...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and outlining the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses. It mentions the importance of proper procedures, the role of entities in the process, and the need for compliance with standards.

Section 358
(n$ /: ÿ & $'8ÿ6:$/ &ÿ-$ÿ39, %& ! ÿ#&/ÿ.:3& $#63 ÿ :+(! $+;ÿ oS]^pibSÿd^PR]lÿ2 /: ÿ 3 ($% %(8ÿ#&/ÿ'#+ÿ+8+( !ÿ +(+4ÿ/ . 3"ÿ3 #+(, +(ÿ & $'8ÿ$ +:$ +4ÿ%!"$. ÿ+8+( !ÿ $ 3%#6%3%(8ÿ#&/ÿ$ +%3% & 84ÿ$ /: ÿ+8+( !ÿ$%+q4ÿ"$! ( ÿ$ +:$ ÿ/%. $+%(84ÿ%& $...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility matters in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as energy efficiency, cost recovery, and regulatory processes. It references regulatory proceedings, cost mechanisms, and energy policies, emphasizing the role of the Board and the importance of stakeholder engagement in decision-making.

Section 367
4:ÿg.ÿ)%"&ÿ,#++5ÿ%"ÿ %&9-.#%-).ÿ9#Tÿ2ÿO++ÿ,O#&:ÿN"-+ÿ-+ÿ)(%.ÿ%"ÿ,#+ÿ&4#& -.4ÿ")+%ÿ ,7+%)9 &ÿ2.(-%+ÿ#. ÿ,)+%+5ÿ3"&ÿ$)O-,-+ÿ )ÿ.)%ÿ.,++#&-OTÿ#&%-,7O#%ÿ3"%"&ÿ%"Tÿ+")7O ÿ2ÿ #,,)7.% ÿ()&ÿ-.ÿ#ÿ$&-9#&Tÿ,)+%8((,%-a.++ÿ%+%:ÿN"ÿ ,-+-).ÿ)(ÿ3"-,"ÿ.).8...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility proceedings in Nova Scotia, including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, regulatory processes, and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs. It references various regulatory matters and outlines the involvement of stakeholders in these proceedings.

Section 370
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 61 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!"#$ÿ&'(&ÿ)! +&"ÿ(!,ÿ-."&"...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis and compliance with standards. It also mentions the ABCDEFDGHDIJKE and other regulatory references.

Section 377
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 63 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !!"#$%&ÿ'()ÿ! $%+$!")ÿ,-ÿ.#...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs and highlights the importance of proper implementation to avoid perverse incentives.

Section 382
DFGGF@A=SFCF>>ÿANLAÿL Aÿ F?ÿL>ÿLÿ>=OERFÿML\ÿABÿ aRAF NBR?>ÿ L@@B;CAÿGB<ÿ ÿANLAÿL Fÿ=C@R;?F?Tÿ[B<ÿFZLOERFXÿ B;<@F>ÿM=ANÿLÿdeJÿBGÿcTfgÿ@B;R?ÿKFÿ?FFOF?ÿ@B>ADFGGF@A=SFÿL>ÿLCÿ LRAF Tÿ a@@B;CA=CPÿGB<ÿCBCDOBCFA=QF?ÿ JFRFSLCAÿ̀;LR=ALA=SFÿ=CGB F?ÿA...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory process, including the Board's fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism, the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, and the use of HIJ (a term possibly referring to a specific regulatory framework or initiative). It also touches on the impact of these mechanisms on affordability and the need for cost recovery.

Section 383
RFDHIJÿLCLR>F>ÿB<ÿO;RA=DHIJÿLCLR>F>Tÿÿ WCÿ>BOFÿ@L>F>XÿUlIYÿbÿBGÿANFÿE >Xÿ8  ÿpp ÿ37 ÿw7xÿ OL\ÿKFÿ@NLRRFCP=CPÿABÿLEER\ÿMNF ?=@A=BC>ÿNLSFÿ?=GGF A>ÿ PBLR>ÿGB<ÿ?=GGF XÿOLq=CPÿ=Aÿ?=GG=@;RAÿABÿF>ALKR=>NÿLÿ>=CPRFÿ L F?ÿGB<ÿ?=GGF AÿG...

AI summary The text discusses the efficiency and cost-benefit analysis related to a test application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It touches on the regulatory process and includes a filing date and page number from a proceeding.

Section 388
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 66 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ"#$%&ÿ'$()ÿ % +,)-.!,/ ÿ"...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of benefit-cost analysis, including the use of the 678 framework, standard practices, and the application of these practices in evaluating efficiency programs. The document also highlights the importance of proper implementation and alignment with regulatory standards.

Section 392
_QOHGNEMÿJVEÿGJPHPJXÿMXMJESÿPS\IOJMYÿ\HGMÿVKMJÿ UP HHÿJ 420-$1!#ÿ72.1ÿ mKOPEJXÿIMÿIÿZVKHEÿ LENGOEN^ÿKJ IHÿOKMJMÿJ K ÿMKO P EJX ÿ ]E ÿ OGMJKSELÿPS\IOJMYÿ\HGMÿMKOPEJIHÿPS\IOJMÿMGOVÿ IMÿEQ[PLKQSEQJIHÿIQNÿEOKQKSPOÿNE[EHK\SEQJÿ PS\IOJMÿ n7ÿ8...

AI summary This text discusses the analysis of a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power (NOP) and the Hydro-Informatics and Jurisdiction (HIJ). It references the Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework (678) and discusses topics such as energy efficiency, cost recovery, and program evaluation in the context of regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement.

Section 393
[EMÿJVIJÿLE‡GPLEÿKLÿ MGFFEMJÿJVIJÿJVEMEÿPS\IOJMÿ]EÿIOOKGQJENÿWKLÿZVEQÿIMMEMMPQFÿˆ‰DÿOKMJREWWEOJP[EQEMMyÿ _S\KLJIQJHXYÿuPFGLEÿvRwÿPHHGMJLIJEMÿJVEÿWHE~P]PHPJXÿ\LK[PNENÿ]XÿJVEÿxmbyÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DAT...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines a framework for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including the application of benefit-cost analysis and the use of standardized practices.

Section 396
5-#/+6ÿ8)( "&&ÿG%),"+&(5"ÿ()ÿ%+,")5/+"ÿ.!"ÿ8%)8(&"ÿ('ÿ.!"ÿ8)/5-)$ÿ."&.Fÿ !")"ÿ/&ÿ-ÿ)-+6"ÿ('ÿ(8./(+&ÿ.!-.ÿ)"6%0-.()&?ÿ%./0/./"&?ÿ-+,ÿ(.!")ÿ&.-#"!(0,")&ÿ -+ÿ (+&/,")ÿ'()ÿ&" (+,-)$ÿ ."&.&Fÿ;I-580"&ÿ/+ 0%,"1ÿ 2ÿJ ÿ7ÿKLÿ!"ÿMDÿ5/6!.ÿG"ÿ%&"'...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power and related entities, focusing on energy efficiency programs, fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, and regulatory compliance. It references proceedings, stakeholder engagement, and the evaluation of energy programs and policies.

Section 399
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 70 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#!ÿ$%&ÿ&%ÿ#$'!(&ÿ#$ÿ) +(ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in evaluating energy efficiency programs, including the use of the 678 framework and the role of the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in the process.

Section 413
FHÿ 6-&#%-3_#-+0ÿg9&#$1ÿj+&&$&ÿ 7/$2#%-2-#9ÿ/+&#ÿ#%+_\ÿ#$ÿ.-&#%-3_#-+0ÿ&9&#$1ÿ 6-&#%-3_#-+0ÿlmiÿ l"$%!#-0\ÿ!0.ÿ1!-0#!-0-0\ÿ#$ÿ.-&#%-3_#-+0ÿ&9&#$1ÿ 6-&#%-3_#-+0ÿn+/#!$ÿ i!-0#!-0-0\ÿ,+/#!$ÿ/$,$/&ÿ4-#-0ÿ!0ÿ!22$"#!3/$ÿ%!0$ÿ#+ÿ$0&_%$ÿ#!#ÿ 3+#ÿ%...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings related to energy and utility management, including fuel cost adjustments, rate structures, and the impact of policies on energy efficiency and affordability. It also references legal and procedural matters within the regulatory framework.

Section 416
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 76 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !!ÿ #$%$&'() %ÿ,-.'/(0ÿ 1%$...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process for benefit-cost analysis, including considerations for program evaluation and the role of efficiency programs in energy management.

Section 420
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 77 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!"#ÿ$%#&ÿ'(ÿ'ÿ'")! (% (ÿ(!...

AI summary This section discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses, including considerations for ensuring accuracy and alignment with regulatory standards.

Section 424
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 78 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ$% ÿ&'# () ÿ+,ÿ!-('!ÿ.%...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings, focusing on the use of standardized practices for evaluating energy efficiency programs and their impact on cost recovery and program effectiveness.

Section 425
ÿ&'ÿ(ÿ6&D'ÿ"+&/&+0ÿ) D&#ÿ+ &+% 0ÿ-(0ÿM+'!ÿ50%'!ÿ+,ÿ5% ! )ÿ %.ÿ+,(+ÿ) D&#ÿ+ &+% 0ÿ5#(")ÿ%.ÿ+,ÿ 6&%'(/ÿ'(+" ÿ%.ÿ-%)+ÿ2,%/)(/ÿ-( 3+)1ÿ2,&#,ÿ+'!ÿ+%ÿ '#%-4())ÿ-"/+&4/ÿ"+&/&+0ÿ) D&#ÿ+ &+% &)7ÿE,")1ÿ 6"/(+% )ÿ' !ÿ+%ÿ!#&!ÿ2,+, ÿ+%ÿ&'#/"!ÿ+,ÿ -( 3+...

AI summary The document discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency programs, including the implementation of demand-side management initiatives and the role of the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in these efforts. It also covers financial and operational considerations such as cost recovery, fuel adjustment mechanisms, and compliance with regulatory standards.

Section 430
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 80 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$"!"%&'ÿ()ÿ %ÿ++,%ÿ-+ÿ./...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and the use of the ./01 method for evaluating programs. It outlines the importance of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings and highlights considerations for evaluating efficiency programs and their impact on utility operations.

Section 434
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 81 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$#!%&ÿ'""#$#!()) +ÿ (,-ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process, the role of STU, and the evaluation of programs and policies related to energy efficiency and cost analysis.

Section 438
VWWÿ[\ÿ 10)(80+ÿ90-T: 8'6ÿ45@'8ÿ4+01)ÿ)5ÿ.'')ÿ/(-)5.'8ÿ6'.016<ÿ )ÿ@ ++ÿ2'ÿ+5/;'6ÿ 1)5ÿ)&0)ÿ8'-5(8/'ÿ:58ÿ)&'ÿ )&8''ÿ58ÿ:5(8ÿ,'08-ÿ )ÿ)0;'-ÿ)5ÿ/51-)8(/)ÿ)&'ÿ45@'8ÿ4+01)>ÿ]:ÿBCD-ÿ08'ÿ 1-)0++'6ÿ 1-)'06ÿ5:ÿ)&0)ÿ4+01)<ÿ)&'1ÿ )&'ÿ() + ),ÿ@ ++ÿ&07...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation and implications of BCD (likely a regulatory measure or program), focusing on its impact on cost structures, program design, and compliance with regulatory standards. It highlights concerns about alignment with energy efficiency goals and the need for adjustments in program design and oversight.

Section 441
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 83 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$#!%&!ÿ  6 7(ÿ) +,-ÿ./0...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process, including the evaluation of efficiency programs and the use of standard test units for analysis.

Section 442
90ÿ39C/ÿ90ÿ<?/ÿ9<?/4ÿ1C@76<3ÿ@4/3/2</.ÿ12ÿm7:5/ÿnWORÿm?/>ÿ672ÿ:/ÿ7669;2</.ÿ094ÿ:>ÿ/1<?/4ÿC9.10>12Eÿ<?/ÿ C7E21<;./ÿ90ÿ<?93/ÿ1C@76<3ÿ94ÿ7669;2<12Eÿ094ÿ<?/Cÿ3/@747</5>RÿT1<?/4ÿB7>Aÿ1<ÿ13ÿ1C@94<72<ÿ<9ÿ/23;4/ÿ<?7<ÿ <?/4/ÿ13ÿ29ÿ.9;:5/W69;2<12Eÿ9...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation and evaluation of the ST+ program, including its impact on energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory considerations. It highlights challenges in program design, such as ensuring fair cost distribution and addressing potential inefficiencies. The ST+ program is evaluated in relation to broader energy management goals and regulatory frameworks.

Section 445
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 84 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ!"#$#%&"ÿ'() !ÿ#+ÿ,-&.ÿ+)...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in energy efficiency programs, including the use of the 567 standard and the evaluation of program effectiveness and cost-benefit ratios.

Section 450
K[ÿcVXMXVdÿUeÿfVgNeÿhiNMÿjklKmV[ÿ JdlNÿ bK[ÿcVXMXVdÿUeÿfVgNeÿhiNMÿ jklKmVÿ ^N[meXlVXUWÿ E-$#ÿ!+.ÿB!4 !"#$ÿopqÿ 0$ÿ5-$#ÿ!+.ÿopqÿ 21!,/(ÿ!((), !/$.ÿD /0ÿ3!(ÿ)4ÿ)/0$4ÿ5-$#(ÿ ?!1!, /6ÿ 0$ÿ3!(ÿ,!1!, /6ÿ4$r- 4$.ÿ/)ÿ2$$/ÿ5)4$,!(/$.ÿ1$!>ÿ#)!.ÿ _WN...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of energy regulation, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, prudency reviews, and the implementation of energy efficiency programs. It also touches on the role of Nova Scotia Power and other entities in regulatory proceedings.

Section 451
$<$+/(=ÿ,!(,!. +3ÿ5! #-4$(=ÿ)4ÿ-+!+/ , 1!/$.ÿ#)((ÿ)5ÿ(6(/$2ÿ,)21)+$+/(ÿ 9$( # $+,$ÿ 0$ÿ!" # /6ÿ/)ÿ!+/ , 1!/$=ÿ14$1!4$ÿ5)4=ÿ!+.ÿ!.!1/ÿ/)ÿ,0!+3 +3ÿ,)+. / )+(ÿ!+.ÿ D /0(/!+.=ÿ4$(1)+.ÿ/)=ÿ!+.ÿ4$,)<$4ÿ4!1 .#6ÿ54)2ÿ. (4-1/ )+(ÿ ÿ PSxSRÿ _WNendÿj...

AI summary The text appears to be a fragment from a regulatory proceeding, discussing topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment, energy-efficiency, and various programs and customer-related issues. It mentions Nova Scotia Power and other entities involved in the proceedings, though the content is partially obscured or corrupted.

Section 455
.+ÿ 2,$2/ 4$(ÿ#.:ÿ,"#$ÿ 2ÿ4.- "1(ÿ0"-#(<ÿ 2,+13 2;ÿ-$5./$(ÿ0"-ÿ%&'ÿ/$,92"+"; $(<ÿ51:D 3")2(ÿ"0ÿ 2/$-$(/ÿ-./$(ÿ0"-ÿ0 2.2, 2;ÿ.ÿ="-/ "2ÿ"0ÿ%&'ÿ,"(/(<ÿ=.:#$2/(ÿ/"ÿ(1=="-/ÿ/-.3$ÿ.++:ÿ-$="-/ 2;ÿ"2ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ7...

AI summary The document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the use of the %&' mechanism, and the analysis of cost-benefit factors, program effectiveness, and the impact of energy efficiency initiatives on utility operations.

Section 458
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 88 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ  7 ÿ!"#$ÿ%&'%ÿ() +,)ÿ-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process, including the use of a benefit-cost analysis, and mentions the Affordable Bill Cap (ABC) and other relevant standards. The text also references specific procedures and regulations related to energy efficiency and cost analysis.

Section 463
?JF?ÿ?=ÿJS=EHÿH=AWGCg@=AF?EFUÿ=RÿA?EGE?QÿJFHÿI=>?ÿ @A>?=BCDÿDE>^ÿEBKJ@?>Oÿ :,s74t7s7'1ÿ  6 7;ÿNCGEJWEGE?QÿDCRCD>ÿ?=ÿ?ICÿJWEGE?Qÿ=RÿI=>?ÿ@A>?=BCD>ÿ?=ÿJ@@C>>ÿCFCDUQÿ>AKKGQÿ\ICFÿFCCHCHOÿÿ

AI summary The text appears to be a fragment of a regulatory proceeding document, possibly related to Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and energy regulation. It includes references to standard test units (STU), standard practice manuals (567), and potentially topics related to billing procedures and energy efficiency programs.

Section 464
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 90 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ  7 ÿ!"#$ÿ%&'%ÿ(')ÿ +,-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating the benefit-cost analysis, including the use of test applications and standard practices in the context of energy efficiency programs.

Section 465
ÿ3.%&,1%ÿ&0'%.)4ÿ>10:ÿ>,+ÿ :,)40+ÿ 0+.,/$;7ÿ@%ÿ.$ÿ.2 ,+%')%ÿ%,ÿ'-,./ÿ/,1<:0?(,1)%.)4ÿ,>ÿ1%.:.%58ÿ&,$%ÿ(1$%,20+8ÿ')/ÿ$,(.0%':ÿ+0$.:.0)(0ÿ .2 '(%$8ÿ'$ÿ30::ÿ'$ÿ>,+ÿ+.$A8ÿ+0:.'<.:.%58ÿ')/ÿ+0$.:.0)(0ÿ.2 '(%$7ÿ MNOÿPGHCGQERCDÿ  6 7 ÿS0/0+':8ÿ$%...

AI summary The document discusses the regulation of energy costs and the implementation of mechanisms such as the fuel-cost-adjustment. It emphasizes the importance of aligning base rates with actual costs and the impact of these mechanisms on incentives. The text also highlights the role of entities in managing energy efficiency and affordability.

Section 468
&(&([ÿ /-0 ÿ120 -+$)ÿ]-,'^,$)_@ÿ4+;!5 0ÿ  6 7 ÿ̀aXMHÿPLSÿPOJLBJÿLÿbLOCJBEÿGVÿSGScJSJOdEÿCZULPBHÿefXgHhÿVGOÿiGHBÿPNHBGZJOHÿBiLBÿLOJÿHJULOLBJÿ VOGZÿBiJÿJSJOdEÿHLbJRÿGOÿUOGRNPJRÿjEÿaXMHkÿILjDJÿlcmÿUOJHJSBHÿLÿHNZZLOEÿGVÿiGHBÿPNHBGZJOÿfXgHÿBiL...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, cost-recovery, and prudency reviews. It references proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power and the Affordable Bill Cap, as well as topics such as distribution planning and energy efficiency programs.

Section 469
SdÿCZULPBHhÿ JLDBiÿ‚ÿHLVJBEÿ FiLSdJHÿCSÿPNHBGZJOÿiJLDBiÿGOÿHLVJBEÿeJkdknÿVJoJOÿHCPtÿRLEHÿVOGZÿoGOtÿGOÿHPiGGDnÿOJRNPJRÿ ZJRCPLDÿPGHBHnÿCZUOGbJRÿCSRGGOÿLCOÿvNLDCBEnÿOJRNPJRÿRJLBiHhÿ XZUGoJOZJSBÿ‚ÿPGSBOGDÿ IiJÿHLBCHVLPBCGSÿGVÿjJCSdÿLjDJÿBGÿPG...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to Nova Scotia Power (NSP), including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, affordability, and energy-efficiency programs. It references various regulatory processes and proceedings, including matters and orders. The content involves technical terminology and references to energy policies and practices.

Section 475
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 93 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ$%&'() +ÿ-./ &)0ÿ !"!1ÿ...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs and includes a table of test applications and their associated standards.

Section 476
B9@F9ÿ K9?B8B9@F9ÿBG=6FA?ÿ79LC@HÿAEC?9ÿ9W=9>B9@F9Hÿ7LÿOAB8BAB9?ÿC>ÿEC?AÿFO?ACG9>?ÿ YlYÿJGB??BC@?ÿ YlYÿ9GB??BC@?ÿF>96A9Hÿ7LÿDC??B8;DO989Hÿ9@9>QLÿ>9?CO>F9?ÿ mAE9>ÿJ@TB>C@G9@A68ÿÿ mAE9>ÿ6B>ÿ9GB??BC@?Pÿ?C8BHÿR6?A9Pÿ86@HPÿR6A9>Pÿ6@HÿCAE9>ÿ9@TB>...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy and utility services in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as billing procedures, energy efficiency programs, and regulatory processes. It references various entities, including Nova Scotia Power, and touches on issues like affordability, cost recovery, and stakeholder engagement in regulatory proceedings.

Section 485
E4AR44;ÿ9A34?ÿ4;5=?9;@4;A67ÿ=@C6>AFÿ6;BÿC8E7=>ÿ 3467A3ÿ=@C6>AFJÿYAÿ=Fÿ=@C9?A6;AÿA9ÿB4:=;4ÿ6;Bÿ6BB?4FFÿE9A3ÿA AFÿ>6?4:877<ÿA9ÿ659=BÿB98E74X >98;A=;Kÿ9?ÿ8;B4?X>98;A=;Kÿ9:ÿ=@C6>AFJÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test under the National Standard Practice Manual, focusing on efficiency programs and their evaluation based on standardized practices. It outlines the process for assessing the effectiveness and cost-benefit of energy efficiency initiatives, emphasizing compliance with national standards.

Section 489
5ÿ53@=D<ÿ766@=C9ÿA@;ÿ93:ÿ9:E8@;7Dÿ7C<ÿE7;L4C7DÿHIJÿ4E87695ÿ4Cÿ75ÿ E=63ÿ<:974Dÿ75ÿC:6:557;?ÿ9@ÿ;:AD:69ÿ93:5:ÿ:AA:695Oÿ _ÿa868ÿcb ÿÿ766 ÿbc fÿ23:;:ÿ7;:ÿ5@E:ÿ549=794@C5ÿ4CÿHIJÿoFp5ÿh3:;:ÿ7ÿHIJÿ B:C:A49ÿ:u8:;4:C6:<ÿB?ÿ@C:ÿ87;9?ÿ45ÿ:...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of HIJ mechanisms, including the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment and the role of HIJ in managing energy costs. It highlights concerns about the alignment of base rates with actual costs and the need for adjustments in energy pricing models.

Section 491
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 98 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%"#ÿ&%'(#)ÿ'# #+,#$ÿ%'#...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and a test application related to energy efficiency programs. It mentions the use of a standard practice manual for testing and evaluating energy efficiency initiatives, as well as the evaluation of program benefits and costs.

Section 499
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 101 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!"#"$%&'ÿ(#)ÿ +'&'ÿ',+-.)...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process and considerations for evaluating efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis and compliance with standard practices.

Section 506
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 103 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ $%&'() ÿ,-ÿ.'/01-'2ÿ34...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the importance of aligning with national standards. The document also touches on the application of these standards in regulatory proceedings.

Section 510
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 104 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ"#!$%&$'($)%ÿ( +(ÿ&,'$&,...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures related to the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism and its application in evaluating efficiency programs, including the analysis of cost-benefit factors.

Section 513
ÿ0/; 1ÿ>',.ÿ6,/(ÿ!"#$ÿ# ;$!,'!#>%ÿ%&'() %+ÿ1%)%1#-ÿ;)/ÿ!"%ÿ4?@$+ÿ!"%#,ÿ/)%,'!#-ÿ )'!!%,$+ÿ!"%#,ÿ /0'!#/+ÿ'1ÿ/!"%,ÿ6'0!/,$:ÿ ABCDEFÿHIJKÿLMNOPQFÿRSÿTUVFENWVBXFÿLSSFWVYÿRUÿZ[\ÿNU]ÿ^VRENCFÿ ÿ _#-;,%ÿ̀ %ÿ%66%0!$ÿ(#-"!ÿ#6 ;%0%ÿ!"%ÿ5%%6#!$ÿ/6ÿ4?...

AI summary The text discusses the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FGH) and its impact on Nova Scotia Power (NSP) rates, referencing the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and the National Standard Practice Manual. It also mentions the regulatory process and the need for cost-effective solutions in energy management.

Section 520
,$" &.!ÿ%,ÿ"#! &$!:ÿ/0ÿ$+!ÿ+",$ÿ'(,$"9! ÿ# %9& %-0ÿ$"ÿ !:('!ÿ/% ,ÿ%ÿ !,#",!ÿ$"ÿ!! .0</&,!:ÿ8 tÿ &$!,gÿA+%-!ÿ$+!ÿl Iÿ,$" &.!ÿ%,ÿ"#! &$!:ÿ# %9& %-0ÿ$"ÿ !:('!ÿ.!! &$%"ÿ&:ÿ8u>ÿ#!&;ÿ#! %":ÿ'",$,Dÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ7...

AI summary The text appears to be a section from a regulatory proceeding document discussing the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of benefit-cost analysis and procedures related to energy efficiency programs.

Section 521
ÿ"#&ÿ9:;ÿ%"80(1&ÿ"8ÿ%&++ÿ(!@$++(02ÿ%&0G$@&%ÿ$!"8ÿ"#&ÿH#8+&%(+&ÿ&+&@"0$@$"2ÿ )(0F&"%Cÿ KLMNOPÿRSRTÿUVWXYZPYL[]ÿ^_\ W]PÿXaÿbcdÿePOfNfÿKgdÿ aXOÿ\ÿhLfYOLiNYPjÿkYXO\MPÿlPfXNO[Pÿ ÿ RTmÿoLOÿ^ LffLXpÿq̀W[Yfÿ <&"&0)$!$!1ÿ"#&ÿ($0ÿ&)$%%$8!ÿ$) (@"%ÿ87...

AI summary The text discusses the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FGH) and its impact on Nova Scotia Power (NSP), highlighting the need for adjustments in the mechanism to align with actual costs and ensure fair pricing. It also references the <=> and the vwxyz program in relation to energy efficiency and cost management.

Section 531
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 111 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!""!#$%&!'(ÿ)## +$ÿ",ÿ&),...

AI summary This text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the use of the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FGH) and the role of the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in the process, emphasizing the importance of benefit-cost analysis in regulatory proceedings.

Section 539
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 113 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&&!ÿ%""&#'(ÿ)ÿ%ÿ +,-ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses within a regulatory framework, including criteria for assessing the economic impact of programs and initiatives.

Section 548
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 116 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ#$%&'() %+'$ÿ -./ÿ012ÿ34...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the analysis of benefit-cost for energy efficiency programs, including considerations for 2023-2026 DSM Plan and the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism. The analysis involves evaluating the impact of energy efficiency initiatives on cost recovery and program effectiveness.

Section 552
XCIÿ̀DJSCÿ_CPWKBPCÿ Lÿ SMHNOH FPÿHÿQCBCRJIÿJBÿdTDJPUJSIJKBPÿOJI\ÿO\KNCPHNCÿCBCDEFÿHBUbKDÿ WHSJIFÿ[HDXCIPÿ MBSJNNHDFÿaCD^JSCPÿ Lÿ VHBÿQCÿHÿ[KUCPIÿQCBCRJIÿ 5,2/-22- ,ÿ eDHBP[JPPJKBÿVHWHSJIFÿ Lÿ MCZÿQSCCBWCIJRKJIBÿQPÿCHSPHÿRTKPDCÿEÿACABÿCSDHH...

AI summary The text contains a mix of technical and regulatory content, including mentions of fuel adjustment mechanisms, regulatory proceedings, and energy-related programs. It references Nova Scotia Power and related entities, as well as topics such as energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms.

Section 561
_ÿ 33ÿ(#f0/#)ÿ#b'-)0(#ÿ+-ÿ20+0(#ÿ20#"ÿ'(./#ÿe-"+.".+ ÿ ^#".!.".+ ÿ _ÿ l!-#c# ÿ) 1 (ÿ"-f)ÿ# !"#ÿ!/k%0'ÿ/'/.+ ÿ4)+-(d#ÿ-(ÿd# #(+.- 8ÿ+-ÿ ""#(ÿ fÿ"#))ÿ#b'# ).e#ÿ TULEDI=Oÿ ^#).".# /#ÿ _ÿ 5,-.d1# ÿ33ÿ1#)0(#)ÿ1 ÿ-22#(ÿ),-(+%+#(1ÿ(#).".# /#ÿ!# #...

AI summary The text discusses the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FGH) and its implications, including the relationship between base rates and actual costs, as well as the role of Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in regulatory proceedings. It also touches on the integration of energy efficiency and demand-side management programs.

Section 564
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 120 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ"#$ÿ&'() +,ÿ)-')ÿ.//#()ÿ0...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes analysis on the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism and its impact on cost recovery and energy efficiency programs.

Section 566
?@ÿDE?ÿNBD?HD=JOÿ>B@ÿ>KDK@?ÿPJN=DJOÿ=HI?ADC?HDAÿDBÿ KNV@J<?ÿDE?ÿVJAÿD@JHAC=AA=BHÿJH @JAD@KPDK@?SÿWE?@?ÿCJMÿQ?ÿA=C=OJ@ÿv\wxw\y_z{ÿ AJI=HVAÿJAABP=JD?<ÿL=DEÿ@? @JAD@KPDK@?ÿ>B@ÿ<=AD@=QKD=BHÿB>ÿN?D@BO?KCÿN@B 9ÿ<ÿ?<:@9ABÿCDÿ8CEAÿ;FEACG9:ÿHIJEÿD:...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis and standard practices for implementation.

Section 568
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 122 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ. /+ÿ01/...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes sections on benefit-cost analysis, efficiency programs, and related procedures.

Section 576
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 124 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ$%&&%'ÿ$) ++,'-,.ÿ/'ÿ0....

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FGH) and its implications, including the evaluation of efficiency programs and cost-benefit analyses within a regulatory context.

Section 581
!"+0!1"+ÿ7 ''ÿ,8& 1$''8ÿ )1!"$+"ÿ0, ' ,8ÿ+8+,"%ÿ1+,+ÿ9"1$0+"ÿ/ÿ;;ÿ&!-!$%ÿ1+,+6ÿ90,ÿ,5"8ÿ7 ''ÿ!".01"ÿ 0, ' ,8ÿ+8+,"%ÿ1+,+ÿ98ÿ$? . )-ÿ-")"!$, )6ÿ,!$)+% ++ )6ÿ$).ÿ. +,! 90, )ÿ1+,+ÿD+""ÿ2$9'"ÿsC3E=ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test using the National Standard Practice Manual, focusing on efficiency programs and their evaluation. It outlines the methodology for assessing program effectiveness and includes references to standard practices for evaluating energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 587
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 128 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ#$%&'() %+'$ÿ -./ÿ012ÿ34...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It highlights the importance of evaluating benefit-cost analyses, particularly in the context of energy efficiency programs, and emphasizes the role of standardized practices in ensuring fair and effective assessments.

Section 591
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 129 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ2!6ÿ"#$"#%#&'%ÿ()ÿ' +'ÿ#&...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It addresses the application of standard practices for benefit-cost analysis, including the evaluation of fuel adjustment mechanisms and the use of standardized methodologies for assessing energy efficiency programs.

Section 595
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 131 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ./01+2ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes sections related to the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism and references to Nova Scotia Power and other entities involved in the process.

Section 608
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 134 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$!%ÿ&#$"#$!ÿ"#$ÿ'(ÿ!$)...

AI summary The document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis, and mentions considerations related to program design and implementation.

Section 616
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 136 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ$%&&%'ÿ$) ++,'-,.ÿ/'ÿ0,...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs and their cost-benefit analysis, focusing on the application of standards and procedures for assessing program effectiveness.

Section 620
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 137 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%ÿ&!'ÿ()%$%ÿ&( )%%ÿ$+ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It addresses the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the importance of evaluating the economic impacts of such initiatives.

Section 639
Tÿ Tÿ Tÿ Tÿ UVÿWXIWÿFYGYÿZIYÿ[Mÿ[WXGMÿ\FGHYÿ W[ÿZGJGMIWGÿGHG]WMN]NW^ÿ]IJÿ fGHNIONHNW^ÿ Tÿ Tÿ ]MGIWGÿ][YWYÿ[MÿWXGYGÿN_ I]WYÿ fGYNHNGJ]Gÿ Tÿ Tÿ T8ÿr7ÿ8s ÿsÿvÿÿs 6ÿ678ÿÿts7ÿ8ÿt7ÿ8s sÿ su7ÿTÿÿ7r6ÿÿtsÿ 87ÿ8ÿ 7uÿwÿ6...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy management and utility operations in Nova Scotia, mentioning topics such as demand-side management, energy efficiency, and regulatory oversight. It includes references to various programs, policies, and entities involved in energy regulation.

Section 642
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 143 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ./01+2ÿ...

AI summary The text provides an overview of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes sections on benefit-cost analysis, standard practice, and various technical terms related to energy efficiency and regulation.

Section 646
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 144 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ $%ÿ'() +,-,./ÿ01(2345+...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of programs and their impact on efficiency, including considerations for cost-benefit analysis and performance metrics.

Section 652
ÿ'$/!' $/ÿ#) #ÿ '$ÿ 1(2$1.ÿ#ÿ3$ÿ 4 (1 31$ÿ0(#(5 #$ÿ#)$ÿ /#/6ÿ(" 1!%("5ÿ786ÿ/#' 5$6ÿ "%ÿ'$/!' $/ÿ9'4(%("5ÿ " (11 '.ÿ/$'4( $/-ÿ :;<ÿ>?@@?Aÿ>CDEEFAGFHÿIAÿJFKFL@IAIAGÿJMÿNFAFOIKHÿDAPÿ>?HKHÿ :;<;Qÿ R@SEITDKI?AHÿ?OÿJMÿUDLIOOHÿ?AÿV?HKÿWFXFAYFHÿÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the Board of Commissioners (BC) and Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) in the context of regulatory proceedings related to energy standards (ES) and cybersecurity and yield zone (CYZ). It references proceedings involving demand-side management (DSM) and includes details about energy policies and regulatory processes.

Section 653
ÿ0$ /!'$ÿ#)$ÿ!#9!#ÿ&ÿ#)$ÿ7-ÿ #)ÿ"$#ÿ3(11("5ÿ "%ÿ3!. 11€/$11 11ÿ0$ ) "(/0/ÿ "ÿ&&$'ÿ ÿ4 '($#.ÿ&ÿ 09$"/ #("ÿ' #$/-ÿ^)$ÿ 09$"/ #("ÿ' #$/ÿ "ÿ$ ! 1ÿ#)$ÿ)/#ÿvwxyz{ }~xÿ'$# (1ÿ' #$/ÿi("ÿ#)$ÿ /$ÿ&ÿ"$#ÿ0$#$'("5jÿ#)$.ÿ "ÿ $ ! 1ÿ!#(1(#.ÿ/./#$0ÿ 4(%...

AI summary The document discusses the Board of Commissioners (BC) and Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) in the context of regulatory proceedings. It outlines issues related to fuel cost adjustments, demand-side management (DSM), and energy standards (ES). The text also references cybersecurity and yield zone (CYZ) as areas of concern, and discusses the implications of various regulatory mechanisms and procedures.

Section 663
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 149 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!"#ÿ$ %&%ÿ' (ÿ%) )(+,ÿ-)+...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses, including the use of the BC and BFC, and mentions the importance of aligning with national standards for accuracy and consistency in assessments.

Section 667
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 150 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"!#ÿ %&''() +,ÿ.&/01ÿ21&3...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines a process involving the Board of Commissioners and the Board of Fuel Costs, focusing on the evaluation of demand-side management and energy efficiency initiatives, particularly in the context of policy and legislation.

Section 668
I:FEIÿH<@@?ÿLB89ÿBEI:FEIÿF:?=89EBÿ@8AIÿFBEA=Eÿ@8?=ÿBENE;:E?Mÿ SKEBEL8BEÿ̀=KEÿ@8?=ÿBENE;:E?ÿLB89ÿF899:;<=>ÿ?8@ABÿCB8DEF=?ÿG<@@ÿHEÿEO:A@ÿ=8ÿ=KEÿcdefghibjÿ8:=C:=ÿ=<9E?ÿ =KEÿF899:;<=>ÿ?8@ABÿF89CE;?A=<8;ÿBA=EMÿSKE?Eÿ@8?=ÿBENE;:E?ÿ?K8:@Iÿ;8=ÿHEÿ...

AI summary The document discusses issues related to fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and their implications, including concerns about base rates lagging actual costs and the impact of these mechanisms on incentives. It also touches on the PQR framework and its relevance to energy efficiency and cost recovery.

Section 671
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 151 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ" 8ÿÿ ÿ #ÿ 7ÿ$...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of energy efficiency programs, including the use of standardized practices and procedures for evaluating benefits and costs.

Section 672
)/+.ÿ 0,ÿ/):-+ÿ.) J-:/&,-+.ÿ): )ÿ +-ÿ7/07-+0-,ÿ </()ÿ4>ÿ+ )-ÿ%3' 7).ÿ7/(&,ÿ7/0.%,-+ÿ):-ÿ 2/&&/$%0?KÿA Fÿ7/0,(7)ÿ ÿ&/0?D)-+3ÿ+ )-@ÿ<%&&@ÿ 0,ÿ' +)%7%' )%/0ÿ%3' 7)ÿ 0 &=.%.GÿA ÿ) +%22.ÿ&%J-&=ÿ)/ÿ3%)%? )-ÿ-L(%)=ÿ7/07-+0.ÿA-1?1@ÿ<=ÿJ '%0?ÿ7/3'-...

AI summary The text discusses the Board of Commissioners' (BC) and Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) involvement in regulatory proceedings, focusing on the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism and its implications. It highlights the need for alignment between base rates and actual costs, as well as the integration of efficiency programs and cybersecurity considerations.

Section 680
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 154 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ./01+2ÿ...

AI summary This document is an appendix from a regulatory proceeding, containing a benefit-cost analysis test application and a reference to the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures and standards for evaluating efficiency programs and includes technical and procedural information.

Section 682
ÿRÿQLKNRGFKÿHKFEÿZZÿFLrUMFQÿFsÿ 5,2/-22- ,ÿ GKERXMRRMNEÿ}MEFÿ}NRRFRÿ Oÿ NLUFGYMRF^ÿ\NLFELMKVVIÿQNRLRÿM]ÿRLNGKHFÿZFrMQFÿQUKGHFRÿZTGMEHÿ LGKERXMRRMNEÿ\FKtÿ\FGMNZRÿ ~MRLGMSTLMNEÿ[K\KQMLIÿ Oÿ vNLFELMKVVIÿSFEF]MLRÿZF\FEZMEHÿT\NEÿLUFÿRLNGKHFÿTRF...

AI summary The text appears to be a regulatory proceeding document involving discussions on fuel costs, demand-side management, and energy standards. It references various regulatory processes, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and energy efficiency programs. It also includes mentions of cybersecurity and yield zones, indicating a focus on both energy and regulatory compliance.

Section 685
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 155 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +#,+-"ÿ./01+2ÿ...

AI summary The text provides an overview of an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes sections related to the Board of Commissioners (BC), Board of Fuel Costs (BFC), and mentions the Public Utilities Act (PQR).

Section 686
STUÿIVVHNWIOHGXÿÿ dMT\MIbÿjKbNJN[UMIUNTJÿ̀T[U[ÿ >+?#5ÿ kUNHNU_ÿdGM]TMbIJWGÿfJWGJUNaG[ÿ MYGZ[GTMFGMÿWIGM[Gÿÿ]JTTMÿÿJKIN[UUFMNMOIFHÿU\GIK[ÿÿF[UUTNHMNUING\G[Xÿÿ ^HGWUMNWJÿFTUUNÿHINU]_]Gÿ[WUUTÿTMIUZ\GGMÿMÿ]GF[GTHF[XMÿWG[ÿKTÿ @6#":ÿ MGKNUÿIJKÿ̀...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving the Board of Commissioners and the Board of Fuel Costs, focusing on topics such as demand-side management, energy standards, and cybersecurity. It mentions proceedings related to fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and energy efficiency programs.

Section 691
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 157 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +,&-..#/,01#2#+...

AI summary This document is an appendix from a regulatory proceeding, containing a benefit-cost analysis test application and a reference to the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes tables with various metrics and categories related to efficiency programs and analysis.

Section 699
/,0#"8,ÿ#.ÿ"#+ÿ5&00ÿ !%"0"#$6ÿ" /,+,3ÿ#),ÿ,;!, #,-ÿ0"5,#"',ÿ.5ÿ#),ÿ %, ,5"#+ÿ -ÿ .+#+ÿ +#./(,ÿ++,#ÿ7"00ÿ-, /,+,2ÿ=. +,9&, #0$3ÿÿ>=?ÿ5./ÿ-"+#/"%&#,-ÿ ##/"%&#%0,ÿ#.ÿ, )ÿ'.-,2ÿ +#./(,ÿ+).&0-ÿ . +"-,/ÿ#),ÿ,;!, #,-ÿ&+,5&0ÿ0"5,#"',ÿ.5ÿ#),ÿ/,+.&/...

AI summary The document discusses the Board of Commissioners' (BC) handling of the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism in Nova Scotia, highlighting issues with base rates lagging behind actual costs and the impact on incentive structures. It also addresses the role of the Board of Fuel Costs (BFC) and the importance of aligning regulatory processes with energy efficiency and affordability goals.

Section 713
%&' )'ÿ!$'#ÿ-'ÿ>?@AB>C?D@ÿ"5( '&ÿ!"'#(%! (5ÿ"#!,%5'6ÿE-%+ÿ)! ,%&' )'ÿ:%55ÿ(55!:ÿ%ÿ!ÿ.!#'ÿ )! )53+%$'50ÿ&''#.% 'ÿ-'ÿ 'ÿ;' ',%ÿ!#ÿ)!+ÿ!,ÿ'()-ÿ#'5'$( ÿ%."()6ÿÿ F5'# (%$'50/ÿ%,ÿ-'ÿ+!#(4'ÿ#'+!3#)'ÿ%+ÿ!: '&ÿ( &ÿ!"'#('&ÿ;0ÿ(ÿ ! =3%5%0ÿ"(#0/ÿ-'ÿ3%...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy costs and the role of Nova Scotia Power in managing fuel adjustments and rate structures. It emphasizes the importance of aligning base rates with actual costs and the impact of regulatory decisions on customers and the utility. The document also references proceedings and considerations related to energy efficiency and affordability.

Section 723
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 166 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'() +,'-)&ÿ /01ÿ234ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the methodology for evaluating the benefit-cost analysis, including the use of standard practices, and mentions the application of these methods in assessing energy efficiency programs.

Section 727
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 167 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'(&)ÿ +,$-,.!#ÿ/01!2...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and outlining procedures for benefit-cost analysis, including the use of standardized practices and evaluation methods for energy efficiency programs.

Section 731
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 168 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ %&'('&!ÿ)! &#+ÿ /#0#1...

AI summary This document is part of an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and includes an attachment referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses topics related to energy efficiency, cost analysis, and regulatory procedures.

Section 746
FNB@?ÿ?G?BQLÿ @FGONWIACFGÿAFÿH?ÿ@FOAM?DD?@ACK?PÿUTC>?ÿOFW?ÿATEAÿB?JN@?ÿOFNB@?ÿ?G?BQLÿ@FGONWIACFGÿWELÿGFAÿH?ÿ@FOAM ?DD?@ACK?XÿrOÿON@TPÿCGÿ@EO?OÿUT?B?ÿEÿsNBCOJC@ACFGÿEJFIAOÿIF>C@C?OÿATEAÿIB?@>NJ?ÿIBFWFACFGÿFDÿ?>?@ABCDC@EACFGÿ W?EONB?OÿNG>?OO...

AI summary The text appears to be a fragment of a regulatory proceeding document, discussing matters related to energy efficiency, cost considerations, and regulatory processes. It mentions fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and references to regulatory proceedings and board orders.

Section 756
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 174 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"!#ÿ%&'() &+ÿ-.ÿ/0ÿ1'2'(...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis, and mentions the use of the STM framework for assessing the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 757
;6<>@7Pÿ !"!"ÿ_3 abÿcda)ÿef2'g3hÿ X:9;<=>?>;6<>@7ÿA967BÿBCDB<> 7EÿI>P9PVÿ>7;=96B>7EKÿ9:9;<=>;><8ÿ ;@7BCAJ<>@7ÿ?@=ÿ @7ÿ@?ÿ@ ::ÿ X:>l:99;:8<=ÿ><?@>;ÿD69<>ÿ@F79ÿ9A9 6BC=9Bÿ6=9ÿ >7;=96B9ÿ9:9;<=>;ÿB8B<9Aÿ;@B D:9ÿ9i;9J<>@7ÿ@?ÿXYBÿ 9??9;<>O9ÿ@7:8...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to rate-setting and cost-recovery mechanisms, referencing specific processes and evaluations involving fuel-cost-adjustment and energy-efficiency programs. It highlights challenges with base rates lagging actual costs and the need for regulatory oversight and prudence reviews.

Section 763
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 176 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ#"!$%&"ÿ'(") ÿ+,-ÿ%.))ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the evaluation of efficiency programs, with a focus on standards and procedures for implementation.

Section 764
"7ÿ'5"3$Eÿ8!.6(!ÿH$!ÿ'77"7ÿ"&"%0$%ÿ)E)"5ÿ %.))> ÿ ?ÿ17ÿ 7ÿ$)ÿ6)6'&&Eÿ'ÿ4"3"/$ ÿ12)ÿ063ÿ5.0"ÿQ6$"&Eÿ!'3ÿ$3"03'&ÿ%.546)$.3ÿ"3($3"ÿ 70$#"3ÿ#"!$%&") ÿP7#'3%"7ÿ!"'ÿD65D)ÿ!'ÿ5.76&'"ÿ!"ÿ'5.63ÿ./ÿ!"'ÿD0.#$7"7ÿ.ÿ'ÿ0..5ÿ.0ÿ 46$&7$3(ÿ'0"ÿ./"3ÿQ6$...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory processes involving Nova Scotia Power and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including cost considerations, financial mechanisms, and compliance with regulatory standards. It touches on topics such as fuel cost adjustments, energy efficiency, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 767
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 177 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ$%#&ÿ%#ÿ'()ÿ +#,-#./ÿ0...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of efficiency programs, including criteria for benefit-cost analysis and considerations for program design and implementation.

Section 771
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 178 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&''&(ÿ% +,,-(.-/ÿ0(ÿ1...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It explores the implementation of efficiency programs and their impact on cost-benefit analysis, including the evaluation of program effectiveness and potential regulatory considerations.

Section 772
NNBGBCDÿNIGK=ÿINÿefJÿMIL>ÿ =ELFB=ÿO?MMÿCBB>ÿDIÿTBÿKI>?N?B>Rÿÿ [ÿg?CLMMQJÿMIL>ÿ=ELFBÿL==AKFD?IC=ÿO?MMÿCBB>ÿDIÿTBÿ>BPBMIFB>ÿNIGÿUh=ÿOEI=Bÿ@ELGH?CHÿFLDDBGC=ÿ@LCÿ TBÿE?HEMQÿPLG?LTMBÿLC>ÿ?CNMABC@B>ÿTQÿGLDBÿ>B=?HCÿ̀iUj<ÿklmnTaJÿDEBÿLPL?MLT?M?DQÿ...

AI summary The document discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and program evaluation. It references the Board's processes for evaluating energy efficiency programs, cost deferral, and the use of performance metrics. It also mentions the role of the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in these proceedings.

Section 779
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 180 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&ÿ'ÿ$(&%) ++ $%, ' &&...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes various sections and considerations related to the analysis and evaluation of programs and initiatives.

Section 788
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 183 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&ÿ'()$ +%ÿ ,-.ÿ'(/%01...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the methodology for evaluating benefit-cost analysis, including the use of standard practices and the importance of proper application of these methods in regulatory proceedings.

Section 790
%1ÿ) &/2"%1&ÿ2##21/ ('/'%&ÿ/2ÿ #!1/')'#!/%ÿ'(ÿ-.ÿ#1201!"&ÿ9'/4ÿ/4%ÿ)42')%ÿ23ÿ" $/'#$%ÿ)2(/12$$!7$%ÿ+%@')%&6ÿ& )4ÿ!&ÿ!ÿ/4%1"2&/!/6ÿ9!/%1ÿ4%!/%16ÿ#22$ÿ# "#6ÿ Aÿ)4!10%16ÿ!(+ÿ7!//%1'%&Bÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test in the context of a regulatory proceeding. It references the National Standard Practice Manual and outlines a framework for evaluating energy efficiency programs. The document appears to be part of a regulatory filing related to energy efficiency and includes procedural and analytical elements.

Section 793
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 185 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$"%&ÿ () +,-+)./ÿ0+1ÿ ,...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test under the EfficiencyOne program, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the methodology for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of efficiency programs, including the use of standard practice guidelines and the evaluation of demand-side management initiatives.

Section 794
2) +,-+)./ÿ7,ÿ2117ÿ7=1)+ÿ,<6ÿ611./ÿ06.c,+ÿ/533,+7ÿ61)-=?,+)6-ÿ,+ÿ/>/712ÿ611./@ÿÿ [ÿAÿ 0235/ÿ2) +,-+).ÿ)/ÿ/)2)80+ÿ7,ÿ0ÿ/)6-81ÿ 5/7,21+ÿ2) +,-+).ÿ1Y 137ÿ)7ÿ/1+L1/ÿ2587)381ÿ?5)8.)6-/ÿ 7=07ÿ 06ÿ?1ÿ ,67)-5,5/ÿ,+ÿ6,6C ,67)-5,5/@ÿV6)L1+/)7)1/Bÿ=,...

AI summary This document discusses the evaluation of a 2) +,-+)./ÿ7,ÿ2117ÿ7=1)+ÿ,<6ÿ611./ÿ06.c,+ÿ/533,+7ÿ61)-=?,+)6-ÿ,+ÿ/>/712ÿ611./@ÿÿ and related proceedings, including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment, demand-side-management, and regulatory processes. It also examines the impacts of various programs and the associated costs, as well as the need for prudence reviews and compliance with regulations.

Section 807
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 189 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!""#$%&ÿ'"("#$%ÿ)" ÿ+$,-....

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures related to cost-benefit analysis and includes some technical terms and acronyms, though the content is partially redacted or encoded.

Section 810
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 190 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ $3[[']1%5ÿ^_.ÿ$%&'ÿ) +,-ÿ4...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of a benefit-cost analysis, including evaluation criteria and application procedures, and mentions the LMN and LjL frameworks.

Section 813
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 191 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%%&%'ÿ(#)ÿ #+#,-).ÿ+/ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures and considerations related to energy efficiency programs and their evaluation.

Section 824
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 194 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ !"#$%&ÿ()%)!$#ÿ #)+"!,+-...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and including details on testing procedures, cost analysis, and application standards. It outlines various metrics, thresholds, and processes related to the application and evaluation of efficiency programs.

Section 827
278 ¿ÿ1À ÁÂÃ7ÿÄÅ ÆÇÿ ÿ WF<ÿC;EH]ÿF@IFJ@IF;Cÿ;F<ÿBGJJGL@:Iÿ@:;<=>?;@A<ÿ O;E= ?;@G:CÿD<;L<<:ÿ= ;ÿ>ÿC@:IJ<ÿ?EC;GN<=ÿC@;<ÿ>:HÿGO;@N@l I<ÿÿ ?F>=I@:IÿTB=GNÿG:KC@;<ÿQhUÿ>:HÿH@C?F>=I@:Iÿ;GÿN>M@N@l<ÿDG;FÿO<>iÿCF>A@:Iÿ>:Hÿ?EC;GN<=ÿA>JE<ÿB=GN...

AI summary The document discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy management and utility practices in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and regulatory compliance. It also addresses the involvement of entities in these proceedings and references various legal and policy frameworks.

Section 831
ÿtuÿ} ÿuƒÿ C952236E34ÿ08ÿ093ÿ4B403;Iÿ 09343ÿ5>>21C501864ÿ567ÿ73D1634ÿ ÿN93093:ÿ56ÿMNOÿ16101501F3ÿ14ÿ63Gÿ8:ÿ14ÿH5437ÿ86ÿ3d14016Eÿ „16F3†4ÿ0};3 qÿ€}vÿ~stopspt‡ÿˆoprÿ :348=:C34ÿ8:ÿ>:8E:5;4ÿG109ÿ16C:3;36052ÿH363D104ÿ567ÿ 686K0:57160108ÿ86:5ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses aspects of regulatory proceedings involving MNO, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and related topics. It references proceedings and regulations related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and compliance with regulatory standards.

Section 833
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 196 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ#$%&'() %+'$ÿ -./ÿ0120/3...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses, including the use of standard practices and the application of specific methodologies for assessing energy efficiency programs.

Section 834
5/?/24ÿ6/5/??@7ÿ1D^/049A/>ÿ̀@26ÿE4979j/ÿ6955/?/24ÿ;<=ÿ 4/0.2171:9/>Fÿ kÿ1m2ÿnopÿ qÿr 7s8 ÿn ÿÿtÿÿ3878oqÿu/A/?@:92:ÿvddÿw\ÿ<<ÿ@26ÿ;=ÿA9@ÿ /x9>492:ÿ0E>41B/?ÿ3?1:?@B>ÿ4.@4ÿ9207E6/ÿ?/>1E?0/>ÿ>E0.ÿ@>ÿ\9Ny9N/2@D7/6ÿ4./?B1>4@4>ÿ̀...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency programs and utility regulations in Nova Scotia, including topics such as energy efficiency, rate designs, and compliance with energy efficiency standards. It references regulatory processes, stakeholder engagement, and the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 837
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 197 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&'#%"(ÿ) #!$+ÿ+',ÿ +ÿ...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, including the use of the TUV framework and considerations for program design and evaluation.

Section 841
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 198 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&'ÿ() %ÿ+) , ÿ-./,ÿ"0...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the use of the -./, methodology for evaluating energy efficiency programs and mentions the importance of aligning cost recovery with program performance. Key topics include benefit-cost analysis and energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 842
,ÿ a7 %,$̀ ÿ9"ÿ , ÿ f4":ÿ+!ÿ 0"& ÿ a$,+$%&ÿ+0"$% #ÿ1!%+0"1+!0,ÿ6$+)ÿ+ 1)%!!&=ÿ"%#ÿ14,+!2 0ÿ a7 0+$, 5ÿ0 "+$!%,)$7,ÿ6$+)ÿ+0"# ÿ"$ ,5ÿ2"0g +$%&ÿ2"+ 0$",5ÿ +1'5ÿ+!ÿ840+) 0ÿ0 104$+ÿ14,+!2 0,ÿ$%+!ÿ"%ÿ a$,+$%&ÿ70!&0"2'ÿh!6 05ÿ$+ÿ$,ÿ",!ÿ$27!0+"%+...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency and cost recovery mechanisms, including the role of the E(> in managing fuel costs and the impact of the -./ on utility operations. It references various regulatory frameworks and processes for energy management and compliance.

Section 846
%#"!&,ÿ'%.ÿ ),&,ÿ)"ÿGH?,ÿ,+)10.ÿ=#ÿ#,&!6'&#.ÿ1,!%2ÿ,1""! !#%&ÿ0) '&!)%'0ÿ'%.ÿ&#6()$'0ÿ .#&'!0ÿ&)ÿ'.#I1'&#0/ÿ$#($#,#%&ÿ&+#ÿ:;ÿ)(#$'&!%2ÿ('&&#$%,ÿ'%.ÿ )%,#I1#%&ÿ=#%#"!&,ÿ'%.ÿ ),&,8ÿÿ JKLMLKÿOPPQRSTUSVÿXQYÿZ[TUQSÿ]^R_ÿ]S ÿa_T_YbUSUSVÿcYQd_PTÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of energy costs and the role of the Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in managing fuel costs and ensuring equitable distribution of energy resources. It highlights the importance of adjusting rates to reflect actual costs and the need for proper oversight in energy management.

Section 847
3'01#ÿ&)ÿ&+#ÿ1&!0!&/ÿ,/,&#68ÿÿ JKLMLpÿqST_Y]PTUr_ÿsXX_PTfÿ !""#$#%&ÿ:;ÿ&/(#,ÿ '%ÿ+'3#ÿ!%&#$' &!3#ÿ#""# &,ÿ)%ÿ#' +ÿ)&+#$4ÿ!% 01.!%2ÿ#""# &,ÿ)%ÿ'3)!.#.ÿ ),&,ÿ'%.ÿ #""# &,ÿ)%ÿkH+ÿ)$ÿkHÿ!6(' &,4ÿ'%.ÿ#%'=0!%2ÿ)&+#$ÿ:;,8ÿF&ÿ!,ÿ!6()$&'%&ÿ&+'&ÿ&+#...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes a discussion on the regulation of energy efficiency programs and the role of the Board in evaluating such programs. The document also includes a date filed and page number.

Section 849
ÿ@#)N &'$@#&#ÿFGHÿ#(=)?0#%&ÿ!% $#',#,ÿI!==ÿ-#ÿ0#',.$#ÿ")$ÿ ),&,5ÿÿ K)$ÿ#/'0(=#<ÿ )%,!#$ÿ'ÿ,.-,&'&!)%ÿ.(@$'#ÿ&+'&ÿI',ÿ")$# ',&ÿ&)ÿ-#ÿ%###ÿ"!1#ÿ?#'$,ÿ"$)0ÿ%)I5ÿJ+#ÿ ")$# ',&ÿI',ÿ-',#ÿ)%ÿ+!,&)$! '=ÿ=) '=!l#ÿ=)'ÿ@$)I&+ÿ.$!%@ÿ'ÿ&!0#ÿI+#%ÿ,?,&#0...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and implications of the fuel-cost-adjustment mechanism in Nova Scotia, focusing on its impact on rate structures, cost recovery, and regulatory proceedings. It references the role of the Board in evaluating cost-effectiveness and prudence reviews, as well as the use of efficiency programs and regulatory oversight.

Section 851
'%ÿ)(#$'&!)%ÿ)"ÿ&+#ÿ,?,&#05ÿx&!=!&!#,ÿ0'?ÿ&+.,ÿ(#$ #!1#ÿ'ÿ$!,>ÿI+#%ÿ$#=?!%@ÿ.()%ÿFGH,ÿ&)ÿ0##&ÿ'ÿ,?,&#0ÿ %##ÿ )0('$#ÿ&)ÿ'ÿ&$'!&!)%'=ÿ,)=.&!)%5ÿK)$ÿ#/'0(=#<ÿ',ÿ!, .,,#ÿ'-)1#<ÿ'%ÿ:;3ÿ )0($!,!%@ÿ

AI summary The text appears to be a portion of a regulatory proceeding document discussing matters related to energy efficiency and cost analysis, potentially referencing EfficiencyOne's Benefit-Cost Analysis Test and other energy-related proceedings.

Section 852
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 201 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&'(") &ÿ+$, ÿ'& !#)$-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for applying the test, including the use of ?@A and the evaluation of programs such as :;<. The text also touches on the role of the test in assessing the benefits and costs of energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 853
&'"ÿ /,)+)-7ÿ0&'/$'%,-&ÿ'&9!)'&%&-#"ÿ,'&ÿ )//)!+#ÿ#$ÿ0'& )#ÿ,- ÿ9!,-#)/.2ÿZ$'ÿ&S,%0+&6ÿ!"#$%&'"ÿ 0,'#))0,#)-7ÿ)-ÿ?Aÿ0'$7',%"ÿ,'&ÿ$/#&-ÿ)-&-#)1)[& ÿ#$ÿ0,'#))0,#&6ÿ58)+&ÿ-$#ÿ,"ÿ%,-.ÿ!"#$%&'"ÿ'&&)1&ÿ 0&-,+#)&"ÿ/$'ÿ/,)+)-7ÿ#$ÿ%&&#ÿ$%%)#%&-#"2ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation of the :;< and QRG in Nova Scotia, highlighting their role in energy efficiency and cost management. It references the ?@A and its impact on fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and rate design, emphasizing the need for alignment between policy and operational practices.

Section 859
lmÿ ÿ :2#ÿ+,35'#+ÿ!(4ÿ" &#+ÿ,-ÿ$(-,5%!"$,(ÿ3+#4ÿ!5#ÿ2 &,"2#"$'!)n$))3+"5!"$1#ÿ83"ÿ!5#ÿ8!+#4ÿ,(ÿ!'"3!)n" &$'!)ÿ #C&#5$#('#ÿ!(4ÿ4!"!9ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 203 of 302 Appendix...

AI summary This document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and outlining various aspects of demand-side management, including program evaluation, performance metrics, and the role of efficiency programs in energy conservation.

Section 860
p?I?P9 :>K?<9A:ÿP?I?P9 :> GÿK<ÿA@ÿ><=P?>Gÿjg k8Tÿ g:B9KA:H>:<?LÿpAHIL9?:P>ÿ i ÿ 9:PLGF>8ÿggÿ8?B9:;8ÿ?:FÿjlmÿAG >ÿ IÿMND ÿ ÿR9<=ÿ f(0(e&+240ÿ klDqpgDÿpAHIL9?:P>ÿ iÿ 8oAS8R><>Hÿ;>:>K?<9A:ÿI>?nTÿÿ r?Kn><ÿlK9P>ÿgJJ>P<8ÿ iÿ IK9H?BK9>LSKÿO<ÿ >ÿj...

AI summary The document discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and utility regulations in Nova Scotia. It includes references to programs, policies, and regulatory processes involving entities like Nova Scotia Power and EfficiencyOne, as well as topics such as benefit-cost analysis and regulatory compliance.

Section 864
n?nÿIREAAE@FAÿ Lÿ n?nÿ OREAAE@FAÿDOVUKBE@FAÿQKKDUOÿQAÿBNOÿ_oZÿNOSCAÿ @GGAOBÿDOA@UDKOAÿbEBNÿNEpNODÿRQDpEFQSÿOREAAE@FÿDQBOA[ÿ qBNODÿIFrED@FROFBQSÿÿ jÿ 42=.$+!#ÿ JOAESEOFKOÿ jÿ ;9<!=+/ÿ IK@F@REKÿQFVÿY@WAÿÿ jÿ MA@NKEAEOÿOBPQQSÿRCSOÿTUDEAVEKBE@...

AI summary The text appears to be a fragment of a regulatory proceeding document involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and discussions around energy efficiency programs and regulatory processes. It references the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test and mentions demand-side management (DSM) and other regulatory matters.

Section 869
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 207 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ !"#$%ÿ$'() +,ÿ-"+.(-"%ÿ/...

AI summary This document outlines the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses the process for evaluating benefit-cost analysis tests, including the use of various metrics and standards for assessment.

Section 870
5QÿWFAFÿD;?DC?; <;?ÿ\FQ>CADFÿg>Q<ÿ 5ÿ:IhÿU=?><ÿFR;PU?FÿFRU?>AFQÿbFTÿL;D<>AQÿ;5BÿDE;??F5XFQÿB=QDCQQFBÿ=5ÿ HF9ÿ=5D?CB=5Xÿ>U<=>5ÿH;?CF9ÿ ?>;BÿL>AFD;Q PFAÿ;B>U<=>5Nÿ[CFÿ<>ÿQ?>WFAÿ AFD;Q ;BÿXA>W >?FAÿ678iÿQCPPFAÿ 5ÿCUXA;BFÿW;QÿBFLFAAFBÿ̀FT>5Bÿ...

AI summary The text discusses various financial and regulatory aspects of a proceeding, including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment, cost-recovery, and efficiency programs. It includes data tables and references to regulatory processes and cost evaluations.

Section 877
Vÿ!&ÿ!"# /'+;ÿ '+ÿZ# .##+<ÿc]##ÿ]#) '!+ÿd ?mÿnCFGopLFEMGÿJKKGLFDÿ S'RR#&#+ ÿSTUÿ -9#ÿ),+ÿ/,:#ÿ'+ #&,) ':#ÿ#RR#) ÿ!+ÿ#,)/ÿ! /#&Vÿ'+)P%('+;ÿ#RR#) ÿ!+ÿ,:!'(#(ÿ)! ÿ,+(ÿ #RR#) ÿ!+ÿYO/ÿ!&ÿYOÿ'"9,) Vÿ,+(ÿ#+,ZP'+;ÿ! /#&ÿSTU<ÿ8/##ÿ'+ #&,) ':#ÿ#RR#)...

AI summary The text discusses the STU (possibly a regulatory body or process) and its role in managing demand-side management (DSM) programs, including the evaluation of benefit-cost analysis tests and the impact of STU on energy efficiency initiatives. It highlights the need for proper alignment between rates and costs, as well as the evaluation of DSM programs.

Section 880
.B6/ÿ6+3%ÿ+ÿ5#;. 7ÿB#+;ÿ#2ÿ0%4: .,Bÿopoÿ%$.)).#,)<ÿA:/ÿ#,%ÿ̀:0.)4. /.#,ÿ$.B6/ÿ4% .4%ÿ/#ÿ $+-%ÿ4% +0A#,._+/.#,ÿ+ÿ5;+,,.,Bÿ#A%̀ /.3%ÿ=6.;%ÿ+,#/6%0ÿ#,%ÿ$.B6/ÿ,#/8ÿ>6%ÿ̀:0.)4. /.#,ÿ=./6ÿ 4% +0A#,._+/.#,ÿ+)ÿ+ÿ5;+,,.,Bÿ#A%̀ /.3%ÿ$.B6/ÿ 6##)%ÿ/#ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of the &'( (Demand-Side Management) program, focusing on its impact on energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory considerations. It highlights the need for adjustments to ensure proper alignment with policy objectives and the importance of stakeholder engagement in the process.

Section 885
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 212 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ%&'(ÿ%&)#ÿ )++ÿ,'#-+%...

AI summary The document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures for evaluating demand-side management and energy efficiency initiatives, including criteria for assessing the impact of such programs on utility operations and customer benefits.

Section 886
ÿ8)X)8'8ÿ5;ÿ]5 ÿ%&'ÿ%1%2+ÿ+)6'%).'ÿ'(',0;ÿ/,18-7'89ÿ jÿ!27&ÿopqlmÿ5'('6)%#ÿ2,'ÿ2+#1ÿ/-%ÿ)(%1ÿ+'X'+)4'8ÿ%',.#9ÿc1,ÿ%&'ÿ/-,/1#'ÿ16ÿ.2)(0ÿ2ÿYZYÿ71#%ÿ 7-,X'$ÿ%&'ÿYZYÿ5'('6)%#ÿ2,'ÿ'37+-8'8ÿ6,1.ÿ%&'#'ÿ+'X'+)4'8ÿ5'('6)%#9ÿ:&)#ÿ2++1 #ÿ61,ÿ%&'ÿ /,'...

AI summary The document discusses the implementation of a demand-side management (DSM) plan and its impact on utility operations, including cost recovery, efficiency measures, and regulatory considerations. It outlines the need for alignment between cost recovery mechanisms and program implementation, and highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement and evaluation of program effectiveness.

Section 887
27%-2+ÿ,'#-+%#ÿ )++ÿ8)66',ÿ8'/'(8)(0ÿ-/1(ÿ%&'ÿ71#%f'66'7%)X'('##ÿ%'#%ÿ-#'89ÿc-,%&',$ÿ#1.'ÿ!"ÿ%;/'#ÿ2,'ÿ5-(8+'8ÿ%10'%&',ÿ%1ÿ \''/ÿ%&'ÿ6)0-,'#ÿ6,1.ÿ5')(0ÿ%11ÿ71./+'39ÿ]^''ÿ_//'(8)3ÿ9̀ÿÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ...

AI summary The text references an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and an attachment from the National Standard Practice Manual, dated May 16, 2025. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding, though the content is partially redacted or obscured.

Section 888
National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%ÿ'() +ÿ,-,ÿ.%/#01!23ÿ4%1ÿ5261ÿ5#$7%ÿ ÿ 278 8ÿ9:ÿ8ÿ:;7: ÿ<=;>ÿÿÿÿ:8ÿ8ÿ ÿ68:8ÿÿ;; <ÿ>ÿ ?@AÿBCDAÿBEFG@DÿDEBHÿIDÿAHJDÿCK@ÿBIKÿL@ÿED@MÿNCFÿD@G@FIOÿPEFPCD@DQÿRCFÿ@SITPO@Uÿ VÿX...

AI summary The text discusses the National Standard Practice Manual, with sections on procedures, regulations, and standards, particularly related to energy efficiency, cost analysis, and regulatory compliance. It includes references to benefit-cost analysis tests and regulatory processes.

Section 890
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 214 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#"$ÿ&'() +,-).ÿ01 23456)...

AI summary The document outlines the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and refers to the National Standard Practice Manual. It discusses the application of the test in evaluating demand-side management programs and includes various criteria for assessing the benefits and costs associated with these programs.

Section 895
_hmÿ dhkKJLMÿ NOPÿnÿXkoÿWkghÿ fpÿ STiÿ PVWXYZM[ÿVMMZMZÿjkKÿZ_lMKg_hmÿ dhkKJLMÿ NOPÿnÿ^_L^ÿWkghÿ Spÿ STQÿ qrWXYZM[ÿ\N]ÿXkosÿVkhÿVMMZMZÿjkKÿZ_lMKg_hmÿ dhkKJLMÿ ]Mg_ZMVh_JXÿnÿXkoÿWkghÿ tÿ STfÿ PVWXYZM[ÿVMMZMZÿjkKÿZ_lMKg_hmÿ dhkKJLMÿ ]Mg_ZMVh_...

AI summary The text appears to be a fragmented and encoded regulatory document related to energy management and proceedings. It includes references to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and regulatory processes, though the content is not clearly legible or structured.

Section 902
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 218 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"!#ÿ%&'() '+ÿ-'.//)/0ÿ123...

AI summary This section discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines key considerations for the KLM program, including benefit-cost analysis, program design, and implementation challenges. The text emphasizes the importance of accurate cost-benefit evaluations for energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 906
\^yÿ _XO ÿaQbÿRÿcPYÿdPcPeXYVÿ rYgNMOPÿ QRSÿTÿogwÿWgVYÿ ]xÿ \^yÿ _XO ÿaQbÿRÿcPYÿdPcPeXYVÿ KKÿ bPVXnPcYXMoÿbPYNgeXYÿ ]xÿ \^yÿ _XO ÿaQbÿRÿcPYÿdPcPeXYVÿ ijÿ bPVXnPcYXMoÿ mÿ \^yÿ _XO ÿaQbÿRÿcPYÿdPcPeXYVÿ KoPWYNXeXWMYXgcÿ KzVÿTÿYNfW{Vÿ ]ÿ \^[ÿ P...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy systems, including topics such as fuel cost adjustments, energy efficiency programs, and the role of regulatory bodies in ensuring proper oversight and compliance. It also touches on the implementation of various programs and the evaluation of their effectiveness.

Section 910
ƒlLMRÿaNTJTN~ÿM~MNRoÿhReRQTNMÿR„SRR ÿaNTJTN~ÿM~MNRoÿSLMNMÿƒTJJÿjR aSRÿdURjdfRÿhTJJMHÿ €ÿklRÿbdjNTSTbdNTLeÿjdNRMÿƒTJJÿ RSJTeRÿdMÿVPWMÿdjRÿjRoLUR ÿQjLoÿNlRÿbLjNQLJTLHÿIJJÿRJMRÿhRTefÿRadJ†ÿ QRƒRjÿVPWMÿƒTJJÿjRMaJNÿTeÿQRƒRjÿbdjNTSTbdeNMHÿÿ WRfd...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy and utility matters in Nova Scotia, including topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, affordability, and the impact of various regulatory processes on energy efficiency and customer programs. It references proceedings, legal acts, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 912
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 221 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'() '+ÿ-+.(.ÿ /0ÿ123...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and the role of the National Standard Practice Manual in this evaluation.

Section 920
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 224 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'(&)ÿ +$,ÿ-.ÿ/#!0010...

AI summary The text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test under the EfficiencyOne program, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures for evaluating efficiency programs, including the use of standardized practices and methodologies for assessing program effectiveness and cost-benefit outcomes.

Section 921
bÿDNJAPEJNÿTG NDÿC_DGFQ_ÿC_NÿRABCDAEFCAGHÿQDARÿPCÿPÿJG ÿOGBCaÿUCÿCKTAOPJJKÿ_PBÿHGCÿPOOGFHCNRÿ ^GDÿ@c[BÿPBÿPJCNDHPCAMNBÿCGÿCDPRACAGHPJÿRABCDAEFCAGHÿBKBCNZÿCNO_HGJGQANBaÿÿ U@Wÿ_PBÿDNONHCJKÿNMGJMNRÿPBÿPÿZGDNÿOGZTDN_NHBAMNÿ̀PKÿ^GDÿRABCDAEFCAGH...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy and utility matters in Nova Scotia, including topics such as rate adjustments, fuel costs, and energy efficiency programs. It also touches on legal and procedural aspects of these proceedings.

Section 927
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 226 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%&ÿ'(#""%")ÿ !('ÿ+&ÿ,!...

AI summary This text discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the methodology for evaluating benefit-cost analyses, including the use of the National Standard Practice Manual, and emphasizes the importance of proper application in regulatory proceedings.

Section 934
!"#$ÿ &ÿ() ÿ+, )- .ÿ /012ÿ34456718ÿ58493162ÿ0:;ÿ<=>2ÿ?36ÿ9537ÿ@:ÿA3@5ÿ1B43?@2Cÿ367ÿ0:;ÿA3@5ÿ1B43?@2ÿ3A5ÿ71DD5A56@ÿDA:Bÿ?:2@E 5DD5?@1F56522ÿ367ÿ;0Gÿ@05ÿ@;:ÿ20:H97ÿI5ÿ583B1657ÿH216Jÿ2543A3@5ÿ3639G252KÿL@ÿ392:ÿ752?A1I52ÿ0:;ÿ@:ÿ ?:67H?@ÿ3ÿB536...

AI summary The document discusses the regulation of energy efficiency programs, including the evaluation of cost-effectiveness, the role of the Board in setting policies, and the implementation of measures such as demand-side management and energy efficiency initiatives. It also touches on the evaluation of program performance and stakeholder engagement.

Section 940
5IGÿ:E57KDCDÿ UV Vÿ ÿÿWX ÿ8ÿ YZ ÿ7ÿVWÿ 6ÿVÿY ÿ 7[ÿÿ \,( $"//"+ .0")"((ÿ.)2.+ "(ÿ ]"ÿ"^ ") ÿ c7 dÿX Vÿdÿ ÿÿWX ÿ :EDP8BDÿGQ8ÿRS8DGC?ETÿ ,ÿ_].+]ÿ2.//"'") ÿ̀ .!. 1ÿ.)0"( -") (ÿ 7 Xÿ88ÿ 7ÿ6XZ XZ 78ÿ7 ÿ87Zÿ76ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency and affordability, emphasizing the importance of cost recovery and the need for programs that support low-income households. It highlights the need for effective cost deferral and the role of energy efficiency initiatives in reducing overall costs for customers.

Section 949
?:C9:D?>ÿC9:ÿHIJ@ÿA7ÿA=ÿA<<:? ÿF?a?FOÿEA:7FMÿC9:ÿ78?ÿ =??>ÿ79ÿY??Eÿ78?ÿA=AFM@?@ÿ@BDEF?ÿA=>ÿAGG?@@BPF?OÿA=>ÿEA:7FMÿP?GA;@?ÿG;@79D?:@ÿWBFFÿ?VE?:B?=G?ÿ78?ÿ:A7?ÿ BDEAG7@ÿC:9DÿHIJ@ÿB=ÿA=ÿA<<:? ÿCA@8B9=Qÿb;:78?:Oÿ:?<;FA79:@ÿA=>ÿ978?:ÿ@7AY?89F>?:...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy efficiency programs, including the implementation of fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, the evaluation of cost-recovery strategies, and the role of regulatory oversight in ensuring equitable and effective program delivery. It emphasizes the importance of aligning policy with program performance and stakeholder engagement.

Section 952
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 234 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ! ÿ#$%%ÿ'() +,ÿ-.,$( ,/.ÿ...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process, including the use of the HIJ model, and details the evaluation of energy efficiency programs and their impact on cost and benefit analysis.

Section 966
^'$- #)ÿl&"%ÿ X% )ÿV'\!&'+)'%(- ^'$- #)ÿa&$!)%(-ÿ _!"3 5 "%&+)ÿ^+,($%"ÿ V$&'&+!$ÿ('#ÿ &." ^+,($%"ÿ%&ÿ)/%)'%ÿ _)-!(.!-!%1 %&ÿ)/%)'%ÿ% )1ÿ()ÿ .-!$ÿl)(-% % )1ÿ()ÿ,(%ÿ&0ÿ _)"!-!)'$) ,(%ÿ&0ÿ ad e&mÿ^'$&+) ad &m)ÿn (-!%1 V')21ÿa)$ !%1 o&'fV')21ÿ...

AI summary The text appears to be a regulatory proceeding document involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP), focusing on topics such as fuel-cost-adjustment, energy-efficiency, and cost-recovery. It includes references to proceedings and potential arguments related to energy policies and regulatory processes.

Section 972
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 240 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ"#$%&'()ÿ+',-%.ÿ /00ÿ123...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses in regulatory proceedings, emphasizing the importance of proper evaluation and application of standards.

Section 978
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 242 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ! ÿ#$%&'()ÿ +,-ÿ./0ÿ12-1,...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, including the use of standard practices for evaluating program effectiveness and cost-benefit ratios.

Section 982
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 243 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ4 8ÿ4 8ÿ!"#$ 8%...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs and mentions the use of standard practices for evaluating such initiatives.

Section 986
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 244 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'ÿ() +ÿ,)&-".&."!$ÿ...

AI summary This text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of efficiency programs, particularly focusing on the application of benefit-cost analysis in determining the effectiveness of energy efficiency initiatives. The text also touches on the role of regulatory processes and the importance of proper evaluation methods in energy efficiency planning.

Section 989
<6=>:<7F6ÿE6>;38:=K5ÿ;:>ÿ6556><7:DDGÿ3:F6ÿ<36ÿ5:86ÿ6CC6;<ÿ:5ÿ:99DG7>Qÿ:ÿ9=4TGÿF:DB6HÿM4=ÿ 6T:89D6Lÿ:>ÿ:D<6=>:<7F6ÿ94= 6C7 ;38:=Kÿ4CÿfHrÿ75ÿ6AB7F:D6><ÿ<4ÿ:ÿ94= ÿ) ;' .% )1ÿ12 ' /ÿ.)%$,' .% ÿ?2$,2ÿ) 1 '), 1ÿ%2 ÿ . % )".%$ ÿ%2) 12 /1ÿ,."ÿ! ÿ....

AI summary The text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test under the EfficiencyOne program, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines procedures and considerations for evaluating efficiency programs, including the use of standardized practices and methodologies for assessing program effectiveness.

Section 993
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 246 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ! "ÿ$"% &'ÿ(') + %ÿ% ,-&%...

AI summary The document outlines various aspects of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, including the National Standard Practice Manual, procedures for benefit-cost analysis, and related regulatory considerations. It includes topics such as application processes, compliance, and evaluation methods.

Section 994
3APÿ67589:ÿ 6XX3M357M:ÿL0?666NÿGHIJUÿ .ÿ07E>:B3Bÿ2XÿAP5ÿZ 3Mÿl5E>APÿO@=EMABÿ2XÿAP5ÿK59327E>ÿr8557P2 APÿY575X3ABÿ2XÿK5B3457A3E>ÿ67589:ÿ6XX3M357M:ÿL6tqP5u APÿY575X3ABÿ2Xÿl2@5ÿZ58X28@E7M5ÿLRW6NÿGHIvUÿ .ÿ;AEA5ÿE74ÿ[A3>3A:ÿZ2>> M<>EA28ÿ]58B327ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and various topics related to energy efficiency, rate structures, and regulatory processes. It references matters such as fuel-cost-adjustment, energy-efficiency, and regulatory-approval-processes, with multiple entities involved in the proceedings.

Section 997
!"#$ÿ&'ÿ) +!,#!-ÿ./ ÿ0 +12,+ÿ 3456ÿ7889:;5<ÿ8=>?5;96ÿ@A5;7:B9ÿ>:ÿ4>CÿD>ÿ8=969:Dÿ=96AED6ÿ5:ÿC7F6ÿD47Dÿ7=9ÿG>6Dÿ5:H>=G7D5?9ÿ7:;ÿG>6Dÿ A69HAEÿ5:ÿG7I5:@ÿB>6DJ9HH9BD5?9:966ÿ;9B565>:6KÿLDÿ7E6>ÿ8=>?5;96ÿ@A5;7:B9ÿ>:ÿ4>CÿD>ÿ8=969:Dÿ=96AED6ÿD>ÿ 6A88...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation of Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and the challenges related to the NOP (likely a regulatory mechanism or program), including the impact of fuel cost adjustments and the need for aligning rates with actual costs. It also touches on the importance of ensuring fair and effective energy efficiency programs and regulatory oversight.

Section 1002
4" 5ÿ5,-ÿ7#ÿ!+#1!0ÿ1("ÿ5(/'," -ÿ$8<+ÿ2 4;ÿ#,5;ÿ(4;#"ÿ{ 9#96ÿ,ÿ; ;#"ÿf@<ÿ - 5,4#+ÿ(-#ÿ "#+(!"5#ÿ +ÿ}~€ÿ5(+4%‚‚ƒ„†‡ÿ4;,-ÿ,-(4;#" 6ÿ7#5,!+#ÿ 4ÿ#11#54 )#03ÿ-("/,0 ˆ#+ÿ4;#ÿ"#+!04+ÿ1("ÿ$8<+ÿ(1ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ7...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs, including the use of benefit-cost analysis and adherence to national standards.

Section 1009
anual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ)# #+ ,#-ÿ./01ÿ/2ÿ343ÿ5#-!61 /78ÿ9!+1 :+#ÿ4;:/1<#1 6=+ÿ%>50ÿ ÿ ?@ABCÿDEFEDGHICÿEJKÿLMLÿNOKPDHGQJÿERRÿFNQSGKOÿKGTTONOJHÿGJTQNUEHGQJÿEVQPHÿHWOÿGUFEDHXÿQTÿYBZX[ÿ\QNÿ HWQXOÿ]PNGXKGDHGQJXÿGJHONOXHOKÿGJÿESQGKGJ^ÿDEFEDGHIÿDQXHXÿE...

AI summary The text discusses the implementation and evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including the role of YBZ in managing energy efficiency initiatives, the impact of regulatory frameworks, and the evaluation of program performance. It highlights the importance of accurate cost tracking and the need for alignment between program goals and regulatory oversight.

Section 1017
Page 256 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"# $!ÿ%"ÿ%&ÿ'(%ÿ"(ÿ%&ÿ) +ÿ&,%ÿ-#.-!ÿ- "/ ,.ÿ01ÿ20/# ÿ345ÿ, ÿ$"!%4(($%067ÿ80.0', ÿ ,!!!!. 1%!ÿ$,1ÿ9ÿ#!:;ÿ("...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes discussions on energy efficiency programs, cost-benefit analysis, and related regulatory procedures. The text also references various energy programs and regulatory considerations.

Section 1020
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 257 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!"#$%"&ÿ'('ÿ) + ,ÿ-(.ÿ#/...

AI summary This section discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various procedures and considerations for evaluating energy efficiency programs, including benefit-cost analysis and standard practices for implementation.

Section 1023
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 258 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ#$%&'(#ÿ)"#"ÿ #ÿ"%&#ÿ'...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes various sections outlining different aspects of the analysis, such as the application of standards and practices in energy efficiency programs.

Section 1026
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 259 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ"#$%ÿ#&'"#("$) +ÿ(+()"!...

AI summary The text outlines a benefit-cost analysis test application from EfficiencyOne, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It details various sections and subsections related to the analysis, including specific procedures and standards for evaluation.

Section 1027
EDÿ (@$%%$-ÿ$@' )"%;ÿ /ÿC23ÿ!(%4+"%.ÿ3#(ÿFGÿ$%ÿ@ !(ÿ)%"5(,,()"$6(ÿ"# -ÿ4-=(!ÿ"#(ÿBC3ÿ9() 4%(ÿ"#(ÿC23ÿ +%ÿ$-)+4=(%ÿ"#(!ÿ (-6$!-@(-" +?ÿ'49+$)ÿ#( +"#?ÿ()-@$)ÿ=(6(+'@(-"?ÿ -=ÿ(-(!>&ÿ%()4!$"&ÿ$@' )"%;ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8...

AI summary The document includes an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding, though the content is partially obscured or corrupted.

Section 1029
!"#$ÿ&'ÿ) +"#,#-!+.ÿ/-0,1&223,#4!00ÿ)0,0ÿ 5678ÿ9::;<=7>ÿ:?@A7=;8ÿ9ÿ=;8B?7:C7@<ÿ@DÿC6;ÿC?9=7C7@<9EÿC;8C8ÿF8;=ÿD@?ÿ988;887 ÿ 9E8@ÿ;O:6987g;8ÿC6;ÿ=78C7 ÿXÿD@?ÿO@?;ÿ=;C97E;=ÿ7 ÿ:?@A7=;8ÿ7 ÿ=;8B?7M;8ÿC6;ÿZ;fÿ;E;O; ÿ:?@A7=;8kÿ uÿXÿ=;8B?7:C7@<ÿ@D...

AI summary The document discusses the regulatory proceedings related to the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), including the analysis of cost recovery mechanisms, the impact of fuel-cost-adjustment, and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs. It outlines various regulatory processes, compliance, and stakeholder engagement.

Section 1036
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 262 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ"#$%$#&ÿ() #ÿ+, #ÿ   8...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, including the use of the BCD (Benefit-Cost Analysis) framework to evaluate energy efficiency initiatives and their impact on energy use and cost recovery.

Section 1040
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 263 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ"#$%&'()ÿ+#,'ÿ-&,'ÿ  ...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for conducting a benefit-cost analysis, including considerations for evaluating energy efficiency programs and their impact on utility operations and customer benefits.

Section 1041
ÿ 91@9ÿ1@I2ÿ3@59<?4F@5ÿ<=925279ÿ<=ÿ@ÿ5@=a2ÿ68ÿ76?<29@Fÿ?6=7<>25@9<6=7Lÿ74?1ÿ@7ÿ2=I<56=H2=9@Fÿ65ÿ2?6=6H<?ÿ >2I2F63H2=9ÿ?6=?25=7Lÿ<=ÿ@>><9<6=ÿ96ÿ@=ÿ<=925279ÿ<=ÿH<= ÿ288<?<2=?Jÿ356a5@Hÿ 3@59<?<3@=9ÿ?6797Kÿ gÿh(i'%$%j(k'ÿ+#,'ÿ-&,'ÿ   8. 7lÿ0...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy programs, including the Clean Energy (CDE) initiative and the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ). It outlines issues with fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and the need for prudence reviews in energy planning. The document references regulatory processes, stakeholder engagement, and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs.

Section 1044
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 264 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#" $!%ÿ&'ÿ$&$()$) +ÿ,)$...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application of benefit-cost analysis in the context of energy efficiency programs, emphasizing the role of the MNO (Mandatory Net Output) and the importance of aligning cost and benefit assessments with regulatory standards.

Section 1048
V?GJDÿIÿSCNJÿHCSONJKJFD?VJÿV?JMÿCQÿ[\Yÿ?SOIH>Dÿ>KIFÿ XC>I@ÿYJDCRNHJÿ >SR KJÿ=BX]ÿ?FH@RG?FTÿ?SOIH>DÿCQÿC>KJNÿQRJ@D]ÿMK?HKÿ?DÿKJ@OQR@ÿQCNÿ EFG?HI>JDÿ>KJÿ>C>I@ÿHCD>ÿCQÿIÿNJDCRNHJ]ÿ @>?PQRJ@ÿONCTNISD]ÿIFGÿ?SOIH>DÿCFÿ[\YÿONCTNISÿ BCD>ÿ OIN>?H?O...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy programs and policies in Nova Scotia, focusing on topics like fuel-cost-adjustment, energy-efficiency, and regulatory processes. It outlines the need for alignment between energy programs and regulatory frameworks to ensure effective implementation and compliance.

Section 1051
!"#$%ÿ'(ÿ +,"-.!+ÿ/,01!"2-ÿ,"#ÿ3..-!22$"4ÿ51 ,62-ÿ 789:ÿ;<<=>?9@ÿ F=ÿB>ÿ8BGÿHBÿ9?=>H9IJÿG8=H8=AÿF=AH;9>ÿK=>=I9H:ÿ;>?ÿFB:H:ÿBII:=Hÿ=;F8ÿBH8=Aÿ ;>?ÿ:8BEL?ÿH8=A=IBA=ÿK=ÿ=@FLE?=?ÿIABMÿH8=ÿNOPQÿÿ '(RÿST11,+0ÿU.ÿV!0ÿ/U$"2-ÿ Wÿ78=ÿH=AMÿYZ[]^_ [ÿa...

AI summary The text discusses the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), focusing on benefit-cost analysis (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives. It also references Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Mandatory Net Output (MNO) in the context of energy regulation and policy.

Section 1054
1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 267 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !ÿ#$%&'() %+'$ÿ-$(ÿ./&0+$'...

AI summary This document discusses the application of the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual and the Yukon Energy Program. It outlines the process for evaluating energy efficiency programs and includes references to benefit-cost analysis and other related practices.

Section 1055
D7Y7Dÿ?5ÿ7YY5D?>ÿRWÿe5QSedÿ>?S?7dÿSTAÿY7A7DSeÿ SVVD5VDBS?7ÿ?5ÿ7XQeB@?ÿAB>7ÿÿR5?Cÿ ST 5 ?C 7 D ÿV S D ?W ÿS TAÿ c5h7DT67T?>ÿ?5ÿD7AB>?DBR@?7ÿ65T7Wÿ?5ÿ?C5>7ÿBTÿT77AaÿbWVBQSeÿ 7XS6Ve7>ÿ5Yÿ?DST>Y7DÿVSW67T?>ÿBTQe@A7ÿc5h7DT67T?ÿVD5cDS6>ÿ>@QCÿ B6V...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency, cost recovery, and the role of various entities in the process. It mentions the involvement of Nova Scotia Power and the Yukon Energy Program, and touches on topics like fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms and regulatory oversight.

Section 1062
QEFQRÿEFGÿDHIKGÿIMÿEFGÿEGDEAÿ EFGÿDHIKGÿIMÿEFGÿHIDE EGDEÿPDGYÿ EGDEÿPDGYÿ eJLE[ÿVGHGQXQRSÿjGRGMQEgÿkIDEÿHPDEI^GLDÿJLGÿE[KQHJNN[ÿEFGÿLGHQKQGREDÿ GMMGHEQXGRGDDÿEGDEWÿ IMÿMQRJRHQJNÿQRHGREQXGDAÿiFGQLÿQ^KJHEDÿJLGÿQRHNPYGYÿQRÿDI^GÿEGDEDÿ ZPEÿRIE...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy programs, including the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML). It mentions the Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCD) and Clean Energy (CDE) initiatives, as well as Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Mandatory Net Output (MNO). The content involves discussions around energy efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Section 1063
mÿiFGÿMQRJRHQJNÿQRHGREQXGÿDFIPNYÿZGÿQRHNPYGYÿQRÿEFGÿjfdÿEGDEÿJDÿJÿPEQNQE[ÿD[DEG^ÿHIDEAÿiFGÿ FIDEÿHPDEI^GLÿQ^KJHEDÿDFIPNYÿQRHNPYGÿIRN[ÿEFGÿKILEQIRÿIMÿEFGÿ^GJDPLGÿHIDEÿKJQYÿZ[ÿEFGÿFIDEÿHPDEI^GLAÿ %(oÿ456ÿ1#2q028 +#ÿ, +# -).#/ÿ rI^GÿPEQNQEQGD...

AI summary This text discusses the analysis and evaluation of various energy programs and regulatory considerations, including cost recovery mechanisms, program effectiveness, and the impact of regulatory decisions on energy efficiency and affordability. It references specific programs and regulatory processes.

Section 1065
1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 270 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ) +ÿ,#-./-0 12#ÿ3...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes sections about benefit-cost analysis, efficiency programs, and related regulatory processes.

Section 1069
aÿJRYÿEFGLGMILGÿGhHNPYGÿEFG^ÿMLI^ÿEFGÿ nocaÿdFGRÿEFGÿKLIMQEDÿIMÿIEFGLÿGREQEQGDÿEFJEÿKLIXQYGÿGRGLS[ÿLGDIPLHGDÿJLGÿQRHNPYGYÿQRÿEFGÿnocAÿÿ FGÿdFINGDJNGÿ^JLuGEÿKLQHGÿGMMGHEDÿJLGÿRIEÿJRÿIMMDGEEQRSÿQ^KJHEÿMILÿJR[ÿHIDEeGMMGHEQXGRGDDÿEGDEaÿZGHJPDG...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of energy programs and their impact on low-income households, referencing the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML). It highlights the need for benefit-cost analysis (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives, as well as the role of Nova Scotia Power (NSP) in these efforts.

Section 1072
QGOKKPQRÿ JIKDÿHLÿDEFÿODPMPDZÿCZCDF @ÿeMMÿGHCDfFLLFGDPWFQFCCÿDFCDCÿ̀OCDÿPQGMOXFÿ DEFÿGHCDÿIQXÿDEFÿJIKDZÿ IMMÿODPMPDZÿCZCDF ÿGHCDC@ÿbEOCcÿDEFÿJIKDZÿFkJFKPFQGPQRÿDEFÿGHCDÿPCÿ KFGFPWPQRÿDEFÿYFQFLPDÿ_PDEPQÿ [FCÿ [FCÿ IM_IZCÿ_PDEPQÿDEFÿCGHJFÿHL...

AI summary The text discusses the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), referencing benefit-cost analysis (BCD) and clean energy (CDE). It also mentions Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Mandatory Net Output (MNO), and outlines procedures related to energy programs and regulatory processes.

Section 1076
ÿ 78ÿ\ÿ]^_ÿQ'ÿ-$("$%-6"#ÿ0"ÿ$&%ÿ&//#"%%-$5ÿ- M(%#ÿ."( #"ÿ,&#%ÿ( #%& "0#ÿ$+ÿ%'M4"0#ÿ0"ÿ $&%ÿ-$() +"+ÿ-$ÿ%,-#ÿ%"#%7ÿ Zÿ 78ÿ\ÿ^ÿ^_ÿQ'ÿ-$("$%-6"#ÿ0"ÿ$&%ÿ&//#"%%-$5ÿ- M(%#ÿ."( #"ÿ%,"ÿM0%4ÿ-$( 00-$5ÿ%,"ÿ(&#%ÿ N%'M4"0#Pÿ0"ÿ& %#-+"ÿ%,"ÿ#(&M"ÿ&...

AI summary The text discusses regulatory proceedings related to energy policies and mechanisms, including fuel-cost-adjustment, affordability, and the impact of various programs and regulations on energy efficiency and customer service. It touches on topics such as energy efficiency, cost recovery, and the role of regulatory oversight.

Section 1078
1234ÿÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 273 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ%&'(ÿ )# +#, ÿ-.ÿ /ÿ0,...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses in energy efficiency programs, focusing on the application and evaluation of such analyses.

Section 1079
BCDÿAEFHDÿFJÿBCDÿEFAB_ BDABÿMADVÿ BDABÿMADVÿ 38ÿ g ÿ9 6hÿiFABÿEMABFaDIAÿGIDÿBXHNEGKKXÿBCDÿ DJJDEBNUDODAAÿBDABTÿ IDENHNDOBAÿFJÿBG]ÿNOEDOBNUDA>ÿ\CDNIÿNaHGEBAÿGIDÿNOEKMVDVÿNOÿAFaDÿ BDABAÿWMBÿOFBÿGKK>ÿÿ 5-,1"j42-,kÿÿ l ÿ7ÿmeÿ\G]ÿNOEDO...

AI summary The text discusses the evaluation of various energy programs and initiatives, including benefit-cost analysis (BCD), energy efficiency, and affordability considerations. It touches on regulatory processes, program performance, and the impact of initiatives on stakeholders.

Section 1082
!"#$%ÿ'(ÿ $+,-."/ÿ01/!+ÿ 2345ÿ67789:4;ÿ7<=>4:85ÿ?@4:69A8ÿ=9ÿ3=BÿC=ÿ:8C8 89855ÿC85Cÿ:45A=@9Cÿ<6C8ÿ C36Cÿ45ÿA=9545C89CÿB4C3ÿC38ÿ=GH8AC4>8I5Jÿ=FÿC38ÿA=5CE8FF8AC4>89855ÿ696KL545ÿ69:ÿC38ÿMNOPQRPSTPUVWQÿ 677K4A6GK8ÿ7=K4ALÿ?=6K5Xÿ238ÿA=9A87C5ÿ:85...

AI summary The text discusses the regulation and management of energy programs and policies, including the implementation of the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ), the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LML), and the analysis of benefit-cost (BCD) and clean energy (CDE) initiatives. It also references Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Mandatory Net Output (MNO) in the context of energy regulation.

Section 1085
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 275 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿÿ$"%ÿ&"'#ÿ (ÿ) +,-.ÿ/-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the application process and considerations for benefit-cost analysis, emphasizing the evaluation of programs and their impacts.

Section 1086
ÿ 0"ÿ;, "ÿ($ÿ;(+-"-ÿ$ ",ÿ#;+/1#ÿ)"/"$+ #ÿ+/ÿH"'ÿGF.ÿ %0+,"ÿ,(%"'ÿ-+#2( / ÿ' "#ÿ0;"ÿÿ5 20ÿ#5 ,,"'ÿ+592 3ÿ IJKLMNÿPQRSÿTUVWJXYZJ[]ÿ[^ÿ_J]X[L\Zÿ̀YZN]ÿaY\\LYWÿVMN]N\ZÿbYWLNÿc[WWYM]dÿ ÿ 17 eÿfgÿ 6ÿ8ÿh8 ÿÿ8ÿ78ÿijjkÿl ÿ678ÿ6...

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of regulatory proceedings, including the evaluation of programs, policies, and legal frameworks, with a focus on topics such as energy efficiency, affordability, and stakeholder engagement. It also references various regulatory processes and the use of cost-effectiveness and prudence reviews.

Section 1090
Fÿ>').%ÿ&'"ÿ)&0 0&,ÿ/).&B"$ÿ&0B"ÿ -$"C"$"1/"ÿ0.ÿ+1ÿ0B-$&+1&ÿ/1.03"$+&01ÿ01ÿ3"&"$B0101(ÿ&'"ÿ+ $-$0+&"ÿ30./)1&ÿ$+&"ÿ C$ÿ+1+ ,.".Fÿ>'"$"ÿ+$"ÿ+&ÿ "+.&ÿ&! ÿ/'+ "1(".ÿ&ÿ).01(ÿ/).&B"$DC/)."3ÿ30./)1&ÿ $+&".FÿM0$.&%ÿ&'"ÿRSTUVWXYTOÿ/.&ÿCÿ/+-0&+ ÿ0.ÿ...

AI summary The text discusses the Yukon Energy Program (YBZ) and its role in the context of energy assistance and benefit-cost analysis (BCD). It mentions the importance of the program in addressing energy affordability and outlines considerations related to energy efficiency and cost recovery. The discussion also touches on the integration of low-income energy assistance (LML) and the impact of these programs on policy and regulatory processes.

Section 1092
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 277 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#ÿ$%&ÿ'()) +,#'ÿ'#-# "ÿ....

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating benefit-cost analyses, including the use of standardized practices and procedures for assessing energy efficiency programs.

Section 1096
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 278 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ#$"%"$"&'"(ÿ)"' &+,ÿ ÿ-...

AI summary The document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process for evaluating efficiency programs through a benefit-cost analysis, including the consideration of program design, implementation, and outcomes.

Section 1104
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 280 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"ÿ$%ÿ&!!'() !ÿ+ÿ&),-./ ÿ0...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of energy efficiency programs and their evaluation, including benefit-cost analysis and standard practices.

Section 1114
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 283 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ!"#$%ÿ& '( #%ÿ) %+%,ÿ-)ÿ'...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the process of evaluating efficiency programs and discusses the importance of aligning benefit-cost analyses with standard practices to ensure accurate and fair assessments.

Section 1126
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 286 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$%ÿ&!'ÿ()%$%ÿ)"ÿ% (+ÿ&,...

AI summary The text discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines various aspects of benefit-cost analysis and efficiency programs, including the use of standardized procedures and evaluation methods.

Section 1137
//080#5(ÿ4,.#"ÿ8,3(ÿ,5"2ÿJD&>>ÿ;+0()ÿ()#ÿ?>ÿ7# 8#5(ÿ#//080#5(ÿ 4,.#"ÿ3(0""ÿ8,3(056ÿJF>>>@'ÿ()#ÿ4#3- #ÿ+,-".ÿ8(-""2ÿ/""ÿ!#",+ÿÿK<>>ÿ!#5#/0(%8,3(ÿ (0,<ÿÿ ÿ ÿ 1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Pa...

AI summary The document is an appendix to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application, referencing the National Standard Practice Manual. It includes tables and data related to efficiency programs, but the content is heavily redacted or encoded, making it difficult to extract meaningful information.

Section 1147
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 293 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'(#)ÿ +ÿ,-(./!)ÿ 9 6...

AI summary This text discusses the application of a benefit-cost analysis test under the National Standard Practice Manual for an EfficiencyOne initiative. It outlines the methodology for evaluating efficiency programs, including the consideration of cost-effectiveness, program design, and alignment with regulatory standards.

Section 1150
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ  ÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 294 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$ÿ&'(#)ÿ +ÿ,-(./!)ÿ 9 6...

AI summary This document discusses the EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and references the National Standard Practice Manual. It outlines the evaluation of energy efficiency programs and includes a table with various metrics related to program performance and cost-benefit analysis.

Section 1151
1295?=7?ÿ 1295?=7?ÿF6Bÿ=AA>69=I>?Lÿ e:<?5ÿ1CA=9:7ÿ 1295?=7?ÿF6Bÿ=AA>69=I>?Lÿ 1295?=7?ÿF6Bÿ=AA>69=I>?Lÿ U;:=>cf?:ÿ1CA=9:ÿ f;ÿ6295?=7?ÿ6Bÿ:?7:ÿ629>48?7ÿ;2>@ÿ4:6>6:@ÿ7@7:?Cÿ 1295?=7?ÿ428?5ÿ?E?5@ÿ:?7:ÿ 6CA=9:7gÿ;:<?5H67?Gÿ=2ÿ6295?=7?ÿ 1234ÿ678...

AI summary The document refers to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and includes an attachment from the National Standard Practice Manual. The text is partially obscured and contains non-English characters, making it difficult to interpret fully.

Section 1156
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 296 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !"#$#%!&ÿ'() &ÿ+, ./012ÿ3!45$ÿ...

AI summary The text includes references to various regulatory filings and attachments related to an efficiency benefit-cost analysis test application, including the National Standard Practice Manual and several other documents and reports filed in a proceeding.

Section 1159
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 297 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ ÿ !" ÿ#$ÿ7ÿ76ÿ2% ÿ 8 ÿ#...

AI summary The text contains multiple references to filings and attachments related to a regulatory proceeding, including a benefit-cost analysis test application and a national standard practice manual. It includes various documents, such as a test application and a manual, and references to different entities and processes involved in the proceeding.

Section 1165
ÿ 2==74>??E117 36@?4/=14?01G8.K=?G/K14?6143.6A14?Hff5g -fq4g h1736=Fc/E8K 70Gÿ ÿ !" ÿ17 8ÿT$( ÿ((87 )ÿÿx%ÿ ÿy$  7ÿ76ÿ)ÿ178)zÿ4  zÿ ÿ97[ÿ { }~€‚ÿƒ ÿ !^ ÿ„<2611ÿ]8:4ÿ7=C.=ÿM8EÿdB763L1ÿI3.6ÿP1B8E0ÿh1473E41ÿ563@...

AI summary The text contains a mix of encoded or corrupted data, URLs, and references to various regulatory proceedings, including energy efficiency programs and legal matters. It includes mentions of Nova Scotia Power, the Public Utilities Act, and other regulatory topics, though the content is not fully readable or coherent.

Section 1167
1234ÿ678ÿ9 67ÿ ÿ76ÿ8 ÿ 8ÿ78 ÿÿ DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 299 of 302 Appendix A - EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Attachment 2: National Standard Practice Manual ÿ !""###$%& '() (+$'%,"-('#)+.,+...

AI summary The document contains references to an EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application and related attachments, including a National Standard Practice Manual. It includes citations to various legal and regulatory documents, as well as names of individuals and organizations involved in the proceeding.

Section 1175
3[J=@D2KK:0=D ÿ q X ÿ_=0/H4ÿf=L9/:2DJ9=ÿU3:J=J@D/2DJ9=ÿr_fUs ÿ !"2 ÿ&8ÿ)8 ÿQ ÿ ÿ678ÿ2 ÿ 8ÿ 278  ÿCDD1@EFFGGG 0J2 H9IF0K0BD/JBJD4F2==72KFCD:KF012ePe! CD:K ÿ ÿ !"# ÿQ7RÿS (ÿ 8 ÿÿ7ÿÿ 8 ÿ8S7ÿÿ8 7ÿÿ(ÿt ÿ2 uÿ...

AI summary This document outlines the development of a Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) framework for Nova Scotia, prepared by Energy Futures Group, Inc. in May 2025. It is part of an application for a Benefit-Cost Analysis Test under the EfficiencyOne program.

Section 1187
Page 4 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix B energyfuturesgroup.com 5 List of Figures Figure 1: Illustrative Example of Recommended Nova Scotia Test .............................................. 21 Figure 2...

AI summary The document is an appendix to an application for a Benefit-Cost Analysis Test under the EfficiencyOne program. It includes figures related to the Nova Scotia test, benefit-cost analysis principles, and estimated benefits of reduced air pollutants.

Section 1200
Table 1: Summary of EFG Recommendation on Categories for Inclusion in Nova Scotia Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Test Include in “Nova Scotia Impact Type Sub-Category Impacts 8 Test” 9 Notes Reflect updated electric system Utility Electric Al...

AI summary The table outlines the EFG's recommendation on categories for inclusion in the Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Test in Nova Scotia. It specifies which impact types and sub-categories should be included in the test, such as utility system electric and gas costs, non-utility system greenhouse gas emissions, and host customer costs.

Section 1206
energyfuturesgroup.com 15 Non-Utility System Impacts Based on the working group’s review of Nova Scotia policies and the NSPM guidance, EFG recommends the inclusion of non-utility impacts as summarized in Table 4. Table 4: Non-Utility Impa...

AI summary The Energy Futures Group (EFG) recommends the inclusion of non-utility system impacts in Nova Scotia's policy framework, as outlined in Table 4, which categorizes impacts related to energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), distributed generation (DG), demand-side management (DS), electric vehicles (EV), and building efficiency (BE).

Section 1220
energyfuturesgroup.com 20 The results of the illustrative example in Table 5 indicate that the cost effectiveness of the 1,000 heat pump replacements depends upon the type of fuel displaced, and that heat pumps displacing fuel oil or elect...

AI summary The illustrative example in Table 5 shows that replacing 1,000 heat pumps is cost-effective when displacing fuel oil or electric resistance, yielding net benefits of $25 million and $31 million, respectively. However, replacing natural gas with heat pumps results in a net cost increase of $17 million. Electric system costs increase by roughly $26 million in both cases.

Section 1237
energyfuturesgroup.com 30 At the fifth workshop, the working group reviewed quantitative examples and host customer impacts. The working group also discussed the consultant team’s recommendation for host customer non-energy impacts (NEIs)...

AI summary The working group reviewed quantitative examples and host customer impacts, discussing the consultant team’s recommendations on non-energy impacts (NEIs) and societal NEIs. They also reviewed Nova Scotia's applicable policies, including the Energy Reform Act (ERA), which has significant implications for the structure and regulatory authority of the newly created NSEB and the categories of impacts in a new Nova Scotia test.

Section 1239
Page 30 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix B energyfuturesgroup.com 31 and criteria air pollutants are supported by the ERA’s pending amendments to the Public Utilities Act. 2. Nova Scotia Public Utilities...

AI summary The text discusses the Nova Scotia Public Utilities Act, specifically the demand-side management (DSM) section, which supports electrification to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and electricity costs. It outlines the definition of DSM and the Board's role in determining cost-effective demand-side management programs.

Section 1254
indicating which of the utility system impacts in Table 8 were included in the BCA test that E1 used to screen the 2023-2025 DSM portfolio. Appendix B presents the results of this exercise. The results indicated there was not always a comm...

AI summary The text discusses the need for clarity and consensus on how to treat utility system impacts (USIs) in the Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) framework, particularly in the context of the 2023-2025 DSM portfolio. It highlights gaps in understanding around transmission and distribution loss factors and ancillary services valuation, and emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement and documentation.

Section 1255
oided costs. The working group further discussed why some impacts have not been included or fully incorporated in the BCA to date for EE and DR and options for including them moving forward: • Environmental compliance- Assuming Nova Scotia...

AI summary The working group discussed why some environmental compliance and utility direct investment impacts have not been fully included in the Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) for energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs. It noted that environmental compliance costs may be embedded in avoided costs and that utility investments in distributed energy resources (DERs) could increase as technologies evolve.

Section 1257
areas with high saturation of distributed generation or grid constraints may be more likely in the future. • Credit and collections – NS Power stated they have not experienced material impacts on costs associated with account delinquencies...

AI summary The text discusses potential future impacts of distributed energy resources (DERs) on credit and collections, program administration, risk, reliability, and resilience. NS Power notes no material impacts currently but acknowledges future risks as DER deployment increases. Energy efficiency and demand response (DR) are highlighted for their potential resilience benefits.

Section 1259
energyfuturesgroup.com 37 shaded cells indicate an impact that was not included or only partially included in the 2023- 2025 DSM Plan BCA test. Table 9: Generation, Transmission and Distribution USIs Impact Type Impact EE DR DG DS EV BE En...

AI summary The table outlines the impact of various energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), distributed generation (DG), demand-side management (DS), electric vehicles (EV), and building efficiency (BE) initiatives on generation, transmission, and distribution utility system impacts (USIs). Shaded cells indicate partial or no inclusion in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan BCA test.

Section 1269
Table 12: Other Fuel Impacts Other Fuel Impacts Description and Examples EE DR DG DS EV BE Discussion Notes Primarily electrification or efficiency Fuel and related O&M costs of displacing fossil fuels. Distributed Storage Commodity   ...

AI summary The table outlines other fuel impacts, including electrification, efficiency, and compliance costs for environmental regulations. It also addresses market price effects and cross-fuel dripe in Nova Scotia. The discussion notes highlight the displacement of fossil fuels and the embedding of compliance costs in commodity prices.

Section 1270
Cross fuel dripe in NS for pipeline gas could Market Price Effects fuels resulting from changes in NM NM NM NM NM NM be meaningful for large industrial customers, levels of consumption but cross fuel impact is generally expected to be NM....

AI summary The text discusses potential cross-fuel impacts in Nova Scotia, particularly for large industrial customers, and the implications of gas and electric DERs on utility systems. It notes that further analysis is required to understand the effects on gas consumption and infrastructure.

Section 1272
Page 41 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix B energyfuturesgroup.com 42 Table 13: Host Customer Impacts Host Customer Impact - +/- Direct Estimates EE DR DG DS BE EV Notes Not always for DR, but possible (e....

AI summary The table outlines the host customer impacts of various energy efficiency and demand response measures, including direct estimates, DER measure costs, interconnection fees, tax incentives, and water cost impacts. EfficiencyOne proposes not to include tax incentives as cost reductions due to uncertainty in their continued availability.

Section 1273
include tax or other incentives as reductions to host customer costs. + Water cost impacts  NA NA NA NA NA Some efficiency measures also reduce water consumption +/- Host Customer Energy Impacts Proxy EE DR DG DS BE EV Time required to en...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of various energy efficiency and demand response measures on host customer costs and non-energy benefits. It highlights how some measures reduce water consumption and energy costs, as well as improve resilience and productivity. It also notes the economic well-being benefits from reduced energy bills.

Section 1274
NA Many EE investments in businesses improve productivity + Economic well-being  NM     Energy bill savings reducing stress of disconnections, foreclosures, etc. +/- Comfort   NA NA  NA Most positive for shell measures, DR may have...

AI summary The text discusses the non-energy benefits of energy efficiency (EE) investments in businesses, including economic well-being, comfort, amenity, health and safety, empowerment, and pride. It also references Appendix F from the Database of Screening Practices, which highlights how over 18 jurisdictions consider non-energy host customer benefits in screening tests. E1 and the DSMAG have prior experience with reviewing host customer impacts in BCA testing.

Section 1278
44 measures installed through E1 initiatives. Following the NSPM’s symmetry principle, if host customer costs are counted, then host customer benefits should also be considered. During the fourth through the sixth DSMAG working group sessi...

AI summary The document discusses the inclusion of non-energy host customer impacts in the cost effectiveness screening of energy efficiency programs, based on the Energy Reform Act (ERA) and discussions from the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG). It recommends using proxy adders, differentiated by measure category, DER type, and customer segment, and notes that 18 U.S. jurisdictions incorporate non-energy benefits into such screening.

Section 1289
ent-climate-change/services/climate-change/science-research-data/social- cost-ghg.html 35 Appendix C provides the updated social costs of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Energy Futures Group, Inc PO Box 587, Hinesburg, VT 05461...

AI summary The text references the updated social costs of greenhouse gases and discusses the methodology used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for calculating benefits-per-kilowatt-hour (BPK) of air quality-related public health benefits from energy efficiency and renewable energy investments, specifically using New England regional values in a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) test.

Section 1290
36 The consultant team recommends using the New England regional values developed by the EPA in this analysis for valuation per kWh of the reduction of other air pollutants in the BCA test. The EPA calculates BPK for different regions of t...

AI summary The consultant team recommends using New England regional values from the EPA for calculating the benefit per kWh of air pollutant reductions in the BCA test. These values range from 0.34 to 0.77 cents per kWh for energy efficiency and DERs, and are considered the low end of the range due to differences in fossil fuel mix across regions.

Section 1291
Page 51 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix B energyfuturesgroup.com 52 Figure 4: EPA Estimated Benefit per kWh of Reduced Criteria Air Pollutants by Region and DER Type One stakeholder noted during the work...

AI summary The text discusses the application of the EPA's estimated benefit per kWh of reduced criteria air pollutants by region and DER type, noting that Nova Scotia's fuel mix is similar to the Mid-Atlantic or Midwest regions of the US. However, the EPA model accounts for regional differences in air quality and demographics, and it is recommended not to adopt higher values from these regions at this time. Future adjustments may be considered to better reflect Nova Scotia's specific conditions.

Section 1293
mental policy objectives. We recommend a value of 0.55 cents per kWh be adopted for the Nova Scotia BCA test, based on a simple average of the US EPA benefit per kWh method for New England. We note that the BPK method does not include calc...

AI summary The document recommends a BCA test value of 0.55 cents per kWh for Nova Scotia, based on a simple average of the US EPA benefit per kWh method for New England. It notes that the BPK method does not account for offset emissions from avoided on-site combustion, particularly for heat pumps, and suggests the need for more detailed data and analysis.

Section 1297
rice inclusion for heating oil through March 2027. Energy Futures Group, Inc PO Box 587, Hinesburg, VT 05461 – USA 802-482-5001 802-329-2143 [email protected] DATE FILED: May 16, 2025 Page 55 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Anal...

AI summary The document includes a table titled 'Residential Heat Pumps – Fuel Oil Example' which examines the impact of other fuel, specifically heating oil, in the context of a benefit-cost analysis test application submitted by EfficiencyOne.

Section 1304
7,878 $ 567,792 5,275 $ 173 $ 63 $ 925,066 $ 1,009,604 $ 8,561,403 $ 12,422,879 $ 21,458,023 The program administration and incentive costs for E1 to deliver services supporting 1,000 heat pump installations in 2026 are estimated in utilit...

AI summary The text discusses the estimated program administration and incentive costs for E1 delivering services supporting 1,000 heat pump installations in 2026. It notes that these costs, totaling $5.1 million, are included in addition to system energy and capacity costs. The greenhouse gas impacts of replacing 1,000 fuel oil heat pumps with electric ones are also referenced.

Section 1309
Page 58 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix B energyfuturesgroup.com 59 The net host customer costs for each of the 1,000 heat pump replacements in this example are estimated to be $4,800 based on an average...

AI summary The document provides a benefit-cost analysis of 1,000 residential heat pump replacements, estimating net host customer costs and non-energy benefits. It also compares the scenario with pipeline gas replacement, highlighting the increased electric system impact costs and greenhouse gas impacts.

Section 1312
$ 9.22 $ 14.87 $ 5.65 84,470 0.84 $ 399,034 2.0% 10 2035 $ 9.41 $ 15.00 $ 5.59 84,470 0.82 $ 387,604 2.0% 11 2036 $ 9.60 $ 15.14 $ 5.54 84,470 0.80 $ 376,436 2.0% 12 2037 $ 9.79 $ 15.28 $ 5.49 84,470 0.79 $ 365,527 2.0% 13 2038 $ 9.98 $ 15...

AI summary The document presents a table illustrating the impact of residential heat pump pipeline gas on electric system costs and net energy effects, including various financial metrics over different years.

Section 1318
,234 7,878 2,836 1,398 $308 $ 180 $ - $ 308 0.85 $367,454 2034 84,470 4,234 7,878 2,907 1,327 $313 $ 184 $ - $ 313 0.84 $347,527 2035 84,470 4,234 7,878 2,119 2,115 $317 $ 188 $ - $ 317 0.82 $549,937 2036 84,470 4,234 7,878 2,797 1,437 $32...

AI summary The analysis compares the cost effectiveness of displacing different fuels, showing that displacing heating oil is more cost effective than displacing pipeline gas, with net benefits of over $25 million versus a $20 million increase in net energy costs for pipeline gas, partially offset by GHG benefits.

Section 1319
t on the type of displaced fuel and suggests that measures and program initiatives targeting displacement of heating oil fuel may be more cost effective than displacement of pipeline gas. Energy Futures Group, Inc PO Box 587, Hinesburg, VT...

AI summary The text discusses the cost-effectiveness of measures targeting the displacement of heating oil fuel compared to pipeline gas. It also references an appendix containing a Nova Scotia policies inventory and a working group review of current practices for electric utility system impacts.

Section 1320
63 B. Working Group Review of Current Practice for Electric Utility System Impacts Table B1 is a synthesis of the working group homework assignment and discussions of which electric USIs are currently included in the Nova Scotia screening...

AI summary This section discusses the working group's review of current practices for including electric utility system impacts in the Nova Scotia screening test of energy efficiency and demand response programs. It also outlines the social costs of carbon and greenhouse gas impacts based on Canadian guidance.

Section 1324
Page 65 of 68 EfficiencyOne Benefit-Cost Analysis Test Application Appendix B energyfuturesgroup.com 66 E. Electric Emissions Intensity: Estimated electric system emissions intensities are based on the difference in carbon emissions estima...

AI summary This document discusses the electric emissions intensity based on the 2023-2025 Plan and an alternative estimate from an updated Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It also references the National Energy Screening Project, which identifies 18 states and regions that include host customer non-energy or non-water impacts in their screening practices.

E-3E1 (EE) RIR 1-12 2 passages
E1 Responses to Eastward Energy Inc. (Eastward Energy) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 4
mphasize reducing reliance on fossil fuels and enhancing energy efficiency. On this basis, Eastward Energy's participation does not align with the group's mandate to meet these objectives effectively. Request IR-04: Reference: Evidence Pag...

AI summary Eastward Energy's participation in a DSM initiative is questioned due to misalignment with objectives of reducing fossil fuel reliance and improving energy efficiency. A response confirms a negative net benefit and low BCR for replacing 1,000 natural gas heating systems with heat pumps, and notes that E1 is considering strategic electrification in its upcoming DSM Plan.

- 2 Fuel Impact Nat Gas' worksheet. p. p. 8
- 2 Fuel Impact Nat Gas' worksheet. 3 2.0% 15 2040 $ 10.39 $ 15.71 $ 5.33 84,470 0.74 $ 334,282 $ 6,196,318 1 Request IR-07: 2 3 Reference: General 4 5 (a) How does the benefit-cost test capture the cost of additional pressure on meeting t...

AI summary The document discusses the benefit-cost analysis of strategic electrification, including how it captures the costs of increased electric utility peak demand and infrastructure upgrades. It also asks whether E1 has coordinated with the electric utility's planning department and whether hybrid peaking or dual fuel opportunities were evaluated.

E-4E1 (IG) RIR 1-6 3 passages
Preamble p. pp. 1-17
Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (IG) IR-06 Page 2 of 4 Bill No. 228, Royal Assent, November 9, 2022 (5) The Board's review of the proposed demand-side management for the purpose of the approval must consider any matters deemed appropriate by t...

AI summary The document discusses legislative amendments from the Energy Reform (2024) Act, which expanded the Energy Board's mandate to ensure demand-side management (DSM) plans are cost-effective and in the best interests of customers. EfficiencyOne (E1) advocates for a single, consistent cost-effectiveness test for all distributed energy resources to avoid ambiguity in decision-making.

1 current data, and of any changes to Nova Scotia policy objectives. This 'evergreen' review p. p. 17
(b) Confirmed. Please refer to EFG's Report[1](#page-23-0) 1 , Summary Table 1, page 12. 2 3 (c) Yes, with the above noted exception that the proposed Nova Scotia Jurisdictional Test 4 (NSJT) test will not address green jobs creation and s...

AI summary The document addresses the Nova Scotia Jurisdictional Test (NSJT) and its limitations in addressing green jobs creation and economic growth. EfficiencyOne (E1) argues that the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act supports considering sustainability and innovation objectives, which indirectly influence the benefit-cost analysis (BCA) test. The Energy Board is not explicitly mandated to assess job market or economic growth impacts.

Section 44 p. p. 37
6 Request IR-16: Please indicate if, or how, the proposed BCA test can help inform the appropriate level of incentives or subsidies for participation in efficiency initiatives and provide an example. Response IR-16: One of the factors that...

AI summary The response to Request IR-16 explains how the proposed BCA test will replace the current TRC test to assess the cost-effectiveness of efficiency measures. It highlights that the BCA considers both customer costs and incentive costs, with the ratio calculated by dividing total benefits by total costs. An example from Energy Futures Group is referenced.

E-5E1 (NSEB) RIR 1-46 17 passages
Section 10 p. pp. 7-8
- Scotia in past demand side management (DSM) applications with the new recommended - BCA test. - i) Please refer to part (a) of this IR response. - ii) Please refer to part (a) of this IR response. (b) Policy objectives and legislation fo...

AI summary The text references a BCA test application and discusses policy objectives related to greenhouse gas emissions reduction and energy affordability and equity in four states similar to Nova Scotia. It also references a document (M12282) and page numbers from an evidence submission.

- 2 system benefit that is not measured and is considered not material. p. pp. 8-12
- 2 system benefit that is not measured and is considered not material. 1 Request IR-05: 4 (g) TBCS: Account for all direct and indirect costs, including opportunity costs. 5 BCA: Program and participant costs are included using consistent...

AI summary The text discusses the inclusion of costs and benefits in a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) for strategic electrification, including the consideration of host customer costs such as EV charger expenses. It also references the definition of demand-side management in the Public Utilities Act and questions how the BCA ensures alignment with strategic electrification goals.

Section 17 p. p. 12
electrification. Request IR-07: On page 18 of 38 of E1's Evidence, a hyperlink to the "National Energy Screening Project (NESP), National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource" is provided...

AI summary The request focuses on the National Energy Screening Project (NESP) and its National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) for Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) of distributed energy resources. It asks for details about NESP members, deviations of the proposed BCA test from the NSPM, the use of the MTR handbook, and how many states have adopted the NSPM framework.

Section 26 p. pp. 20-22
d at the portfolio level in New York. - iii) The data requested for inquiries (iii) through (xviii) are set out in the database as depicted in the Impacts Summary graphic below taken from the website: [https://public.tableau.com/app/profil...

AI summary The text references a database of state efficiency screening practices and suggests that information from other jurisdictions is not relevant to the proposed Nova Scotia specific BCA test. It emphasizes the need to develop a test aligned with Nova Scotia's policy priorities rather than relying on external practices.

- vi) See reply to (iii). p. pp. 22-23
- vi) See reply to (iii). 1 vii) See reply to (iii). 2 viii) See reply to (iii). 3 ix) See reply to (iii). 4 x) See reply to (iii). 5 xi) See reply to (iii). 6 xii) See reply to (iii). 7 xiii) See reply to (iii). 8 xiv) See reply to (iii)....

AI summary The text references the Energy Futures Group (EFG) and EfficiencyOne (E1) discussing the use of the National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) for DERs, and mentions the California Standard Practice Manual as a reference for cost effectiveness testing in energy efficiency programs. It also notes a lack of familiarity with the Ontario IESO Cost Effectiveness Guide for Energy Efficiency.

- (d) The question is unclear. The Notes column for Table 14 does not reference performance requirements, nor do the proxy adders. p. p. 36
- (d) The question is unclear. The Notes column for Table 14 does not reference performance requirements, nor do the proxy adders. 1 Request IR-16: 2 3 Table 8: Host Customer Impacts, please elaborate on the following terms and definitions...

AI summary The document discusses a request for clarification on terms related to energy efficiency, including asset value, O&M costs, productivity, economic well-being, comfort, amenity, empowerment, and pride. The response provided by Energy Futures Group elaborates on asset value and O&M costs, defining them in the context of energy efficiency programs.

Section 39 p. pp. 36-39
- measures because they often have lower operations and maintenance than a standard measure. (c) Unit of output per unit of input can be related to labor and non-labor inputs in an office or non-office environment. Efficient measures (for...

AI summary The text discusses how energy efficiency measures can improve comfort through better building performance and controls, and how comfort is considered a non-energy benefit in benefit-cost analysis. It references the EFG Report and a specific BCA Test Application (M12282) that includes a 10% proxy adder benefit for heat pumps.

Section 40 p. p. 39
y 16, 2025, Appendix B: Development of a Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Analysis Framework for Nova Scotia (EFG Report), Prepared by Energy Futures Group, page 42 and page 45 of 68. Ibid., page 19 of 68. that includes the comfort and other no...

AI summary The document discusses the inclusion of non-energy benefits in a Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Analysis Framework for Nova Scotia, specifically highlighting a 10% proxy adder for beneficial electrification, such as heat pumps. It defines terms like 'amenity,' 'empowerment,' and 'pride' as components of these non-energy benefits.

contributions to affordability and environmental stewardship. p. p. 39
contributions to affordability and environmental stewardship. 1 Request IR-17: 2 3 Please provide supporting empirical evidence demonstrating causation for the following Host 4 Customer Impacts: 5 6 (a) energy efficiency investments and in...

AI summary The response to Request IR-17 discusses the lack of empirical evidence linking energy efficiency investments to increased business productivity in Nova Scotia, but cites a 2022 study showing a positive causal relationship in European firms. Energy Futures Group (EFG) provides a general opinion that such benefits are reasonable to assign, especially for custom projects.

Preamble p. pp. 39-42
(b) There is significant literature documenting the broader economic benefits of energy efficiency, but estimating those impacts was not included in the recommended BCA test for Nova Scotia. The broader economic impacts, which can include...

AI summary The document highlights the broader economic and health benefits of energy efficiency, noting that these impacts are not typically included in benefit-cost analysis (BCA) frameworks. It references studies showing energy efficiency measures improve air quality, building resilience, and labor productivity, emphasizing the need for separate methodologies to capture these benefits.

E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 42
E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 systems, and major appliances, among other things. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), 2 nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter reductions attributable to 3 j...

AI summary The text discusses the health benefits of energy efficiency measures, including reductions in sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, which can improve public health and reduce the incidence of respiratory and heart conditions. It references research reports and initiatives such as the Justice40 Initiative and Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products.

[6](#page-43-4) 14 p. pp. 42-44
[6](#page-43-4) 14 1 Request IR-18: 2 3 Table 9: Societal Impacts, please elaborate on the following terms and definitions relating to 4 energy efficiency: 5 6 (a) Resilience 7 8 (b) Other Environmental 9 i) Please differentiate between Gr...

AI summary The document requests elaboration on terms related to energy efficiency, including resilience, other environmental impacts, public health, and energy security. The response references the Energy Futures Group (EFG) report, which defines resilience as the ability to recover from electric system outages and outlines other environmental impacts, such as health effects from particulate matter and emissions.

Section 46 p. pp. 44-45
- (c) Public health benefits are related to a reduction in mortality and morbidity rates and associated health care and economic costs associated with each. Energy efficiency reduces the need for electric generation, and associated combust...

AI summary The text discusses public health benefits from energy efficiency and their integration into the BCA test, as well as energy security impacts and their exclusion from the new BCA test. It notes that energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel combustion and that energy security improvements from distributed energy resources are not included in the BCA test.

1 Request IR-19: p. pp. 45-47
1 Request IR-19: 2 3 Please provide supporting empirical evidence demonstrating causation for the following 4 Societal Impacts: 5 6 (a) energy efficiency investments and changes in medical outcomes and costs. 7 8 Response IR-19: 9 10 The f...

AI summary The document requests empirical evidence linking energy efficiency investments to medical outcomes and costs and asks for the source of the carbon cost used in the BCA. EFG responds by citing the Interim Updated Guidance from the Government of Canada and refers to EfficiencyOne's previous responses.

- 3 Operator (NSIESO) to better understand this issue. p. pp. 69-71
- 3 Operator (NSIESO) to better understand this issue. 1 Request IR-32: 2 3 Reference: Appendix B EFG Report 4 5 Text Box 1: Summary of Key EFG Recommendations item 6) makes reference to an Appendix F 6 and item 7) refers to Appendix C. Pl...

AI summary The document discusses a request for information related to the Energy Futures Group (EFG) report, including the need for Excel versions of appendices and details on local non-GHG pollutants in Nova Scotia. It also references the use of benefit per kWh for local non-GHG air pollutants and their connection to EfficiencyOne (E1) programs.

1 Request IR-39: p. pp. 79-82
M12282, E1 BCA Test Application, May 16, 2025, Appendix B: Development of a Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Analysis Framework for Nova Scotia (EFG Report), Prepared by Energy Futures Group, page 14 of 68. 1 Request IR-39: 2 3 Reference: Appen...

AI summary The response to Request IR-39 discusses the resilience benefits of E1's demand side management (DSM) portfolio, noting that current benefits are not material but future resilience impacts from distributed generation, storage, and demand response may exist. Energy efficiency and vehicle-to-building support are also mentioned as potential contributors to system resilience.

- (h) Please refer to part (a) of this IR response. p. pp. 82-89
- (h) Please refer to part (a) of this IR response. 1 Request IR-42: 2 3 Reference: Appendix B EFG Report 4 5 In reference to Table 14, please provide empirical evidence demonstrating cause between the 6 measure type and the customer segme...

AI summary The document contains responses to requests for information regarding empirical evidence for measure types and customer segments, and an explanation of 'weatherization' in the context of energy efficiency. The Energy Futures Group (EFG) states they have not conducted empirical research to demonstrate causality and explains that weatherization involves improving building thermal performance through measures like air-sealing and insulation.

E-6E1 (SBA) RIR 1-20 3 passages
- (c) Please refer to E1's response to NSEB IR-26. The specific example of 1,000 heat pumps installed in 2026 is presented in EFG's report and the referenced workbook, tables and graphic results. p. pp. 0-2
- (c) Please refer to E1's response to NSEB IR-26. The specific example of 1,000 heat pumps installed in 2026 is presented in EFG's report and the referenced workbook, tables and graphic results. 1 Request IR-02: 2 3 Refer to Exhibit E-1,...

AI summary The response to IR-02 refers to EfficiencyOne's (E1) explanation of using a 2 percent real discount rate for societal impact and cites the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) database, which shows 16 states using a low-risk (social) discount rate for energy efficiency activities.

Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (SBA) IR-12 Page 2 of 2 p. pp. 16-20
Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (SBA) IR-12 Page 2 of 2 1 Request IR-13: 2 3 Refer to Exhibit E-1, the Application, pages 32-33 of 38. 4 5 (a) Please provide detailed definitions and practical examples of: 6 i) Tax Impacts (specifically explai...

AI summary The document requests detailed definitions and examples of tax impacts, productivity, economic well-being, comfort, and amenity, as well as explanations on how energy efficiency affects resilience and reliability. The response provided by Energy Futures Group explains that tax incentives lower measure costs and that tax impacts are treated as transfer payments in regulatory BCA tests.

(a) Summary Table – Canadian Cost Effectiveness Testing p. p. 27
(a) Summary Table – Canadian Cost Effectiveness Testing Province Primary Test Additional Tests Used Non-Energy Benefits Saskatchewan • SaskPower prioritizes Utility Cost Test (UCT) and Total Resource Cost Test (TRC), and Participant Cost T...

AI summary This table outlines the cost-effectiveness testing approaches used by various Canadian provinces, focusing on Saskatchewan and Yukon. Saskatchewan uses the Utility Cost Test (UCT) and Total Resource Cost Test (TRC), while Yukon continues to use tests from its 2013 DSM plan, including TRC, PAC, PCT, and RIM. Yukon also commissioned a report recommending the use of UCT as the primary test.

E-7E1 (Synapse) RIR 1-24 3 passages
Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (Synapse) IR-02 Page 2 of 2 p. pp. 2-4
Date Filed: July 4, 2025 E1 (Synapse) IR-02 Page 2 of 2 2 Ibid., Appendix B: Development of a Jurisdictional Benefit Cost Analysis Framework for Nova Scotia (EFG Report), Prepared by Energy Futures Group, page 19 of 68. 1 Request IR-03: 2...

AI summary The document discusses a request for supporting analysis and workpapers related to the BCA Test for heat pumps. E1 clarifies that the example provided was illustrative and not based on a specific program design, and that they did not perform a separate TRC test for the heat pump example.

E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics (Synapse) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 26
E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics (Synapse) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL in Massachusetts.[2](#page-27-0) As noted, the proxy value adders being recommended by EFG result in a lower range of values for the host customer non...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to Synapse Energy Economics' information requests, referencing a report by the Energy Futures Group (EFG) which recommends conservative proxy values for estimating non-energy benefits (NEBs) in Nova Scotia. The EFG suggests these values are appropriate, balancing complexity with past practices of not counting host customer benefits in the Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) test.

(d) Please refer to parts (b) and (c) of this IR response. p. p. 27
(d) Please refer to parts (b) and (c) of this IR response. 1 Request IR-18: 3 Refer to the statement on page 44 of the EFG Report, which states that the recommended 4 proxy values are "calculated as a percent adder of the estimated energy...

AI summary The document refers to parts (b) and (c) of the IR response and discusses the application of proxy adders to net energy benefits by EfficiencyOne (E1) in the context of the EFG Report and E1's application. It also asks whether 'energy benefits' align with 'Electric Utility System Impacts' in the proposed Nova Scotia Test and seeks the rationale for applying proxy adders to non-incentivized measure costs for beneficial electrification.

E-8See new revised evidence submitted under E-14 (Evidence of P. Bowman, on behalf of IG) 5 passages
1 For conversion of electric resistance heating to heat pumps (energy efficiency):
1 For conversion of electric resistance heating to heat pumps (energy efficiency): Proposed BCA (societal perspective) PAC (utility and its customers perspective) Benefits = NPV of avoided electric generation and Benefits: NPV of avoided e...

AI summary The document compares the societal benefits of converting electric resistance heating to heat pumps (avoided generation and transmission costs, health benefits, GHG reductions) with the costs (installation and program administration) from the utility and customer perspective. This analysis is part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia.

4 For conversion of fuel oil heating to heat pumps (beneficial electrification):
4 For conversion of fuel oil heating to heat pumps (beneficial electrification): Proposed BCA (societal perspective) PAC (utility and its customers perspective, including revenue) Benefits = NPV of avoided fuel oil purchase, Benefits: NPV...

AI summary The document outlines a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) and Public Acceptability Criteria (PAC) for converting fuel oil heating to heat pumps. It compares benefits such as avoided fuel oil purchases and reduced GHG emissions against costs like increased electric generation and installation expenses.

Is there any relevance to measurements considering rate impacts, such as a RIM test?
Is there any relevance to measurements considering rate impacts, such as a RIM test? - A RIM test should not be applied as a screening test for energy efficiency, as it can derive excessively - narrow metrics and fail to measure proper cos...

AI summary The text argues against using RIM tests as a screening tool for energy efficiency due to their narrow metrics and inadequate cost-effectiveness measurement. However, it recommends that E1 continue reporting rate impacts at multiple granularities to enable the Board's assessment of customer impacts, including non-participants.

What recommendations do you have?
What recommendations do you have? - Based on the above considerations, I provide the following conclusions and recommendations for the Board: - 1) The current primary TRC test is limited in its ability to singularly inform the Board about...

AI summary The text outlines recommendations for the Board regarding the use of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) tests in evaluating demand-side management (DSM) activities. It suggests using the PAC test as the primary energy efficiency test, incorporating the E1 BCA test for broader considerations, and rejecting the E1 Proposed BCA test as the primary test. It also emphasizes the need for cost-effective measures and proper consideration of avoided utility costs and GHG emissions.

GOVERNMENT OF NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, YELLOWKNIFE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 1996 – 1998 Land Use Policy Analyst
GOVERNMENT OF NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, YELLOWKNIFE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 1996 – 1998 Land Use Policy Analyst Conducted research into protected area legislation in Canada and potential for application in the NWT. Primary focus was on balanci...

AI summary The Land Use Policy Analyst (1996–1998) researched protected area legislation in Canada, focusing on balancing mining/mineral exploration with conservation principles in the Northwest Territories (NWT). The work emphasized reconciling multiple-use objectives with environmental protection goals.

E-9Evidence and Resume of Courtney Lane - Synapse 6 passages
3 Q. Will each impact included in the Nova Scotia Test be applicable to every DER type? p. p. 12
3 Q. Will each impact included in the Nova Scotia Test be applicable to every DER type? 4 A. Not necessarily. Not all impacts will be applicable to all types of DERs. For example, a 5 host customer installing solar PV will incur the host c...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Test's impacts may not apply to all DER types. For example, solar PV incurs interconnection fees, while energy efficiency may not. Some impacts are not material enough for certain DERs. The DSMAG process's EFG report discusses this in tables.

3 Table 4. EFG Host Customer NEB Proxy Recommendations p. pp. 24-25
3 Table 4. EFG Host Customer NEB Proxy Recommendations Host Customer Impact – by Measure Category and Customer Segment Non-Income Qualified/Target Market Segment Income Qualified Target Market Segment Notes Building Shell Measures (Air Sea...

AI summary Table 4 presents NEB proxy recommendations for various energy efficiency and demand response measures, categorized by host customer impact. It shows varying percentages of benefit for non-income and income qualified market segments, with notes on factors such as health, safety, economic well-being, and resilience.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE p. p. 33
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. , Cambridge, MA. Senior Principal , August 2024 – Present, Principal Associate , September 2022 – August 2024, Senior Associate, November 2019 – September 2022. Provides consulting and...

AI summary The individual's professional experience spans energy consulting, policy analysis, and regulatory work, focusing on demand-side management, energy efficiency, distributed energy resources, and performance-based regulation. Roles include senior positions at Synapse Energy Economics, National Grid, and advocacy groups, with expertise in benefit-cost assessment, program evaluation, and stakeholder engagement in energy initiatives.

PUBLICATIONS p. p. 33
PUBLICATIONS Woolf, T., M. Whited, C. Lane. 2025. Identifying and Accounting for Transfers in Benefit‐Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resources . Synapse Energy Economics for the National Energy Screening Project. Fortman, N., J. Micha...

AI summary The document lists publications related to benefit-cost analysis (BCA) of distributed energy resources (DERs), energy efficiency programs, and clean vehicle policies. Key contributors include Synapse Energy Economics, the National Energy Screening Project (NESP), and E4TheFuture. Topics span equity in DERs, rate impacts, and macroeconomic clean energy scenarios.

TESTIMONY p. p. 33
ney Lane regarding the application of Southwestern Public Service Company's for authorization to implement grid modernization. On behalf of the New Mexico Office of Attorney General. October 11, 2022. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin...

AI summary Testimonies by Courtney Lane and others in multiple U.S. states' regulatory proceedings regarding utility rate adjustments, grid modernization, and energy efficiency plans. Testimonies were provided on behalf of consumer advocates, attorney general offices, and public utility commissions from 2021 to 2022.

PRESENTATIONS p. p. 33
PRESENTATIONS Lane, C. 2021. "Accounting for Interactive Effects: Assessing the Cost‐Effectiveness of Integrated Distributed Energy Resources." Presentation at the 2021 American Council for an Energy‐Efficient Economy (ACEEE) National Conf...

AI summary The document lists presentations by Lane, C., covering topics like integrated distributed energy resources, ratepayer impact tests, wireless alternatives, renewable energy policy, Act 129, and electric retail competition. These were delivered at conferences, webinars, and forums from 2009 to 2021, focusing on energy efficiency, policy, and technology.

E-10-(i)Resume of Francis Wyatt 16 passages
Professional Experience p. p. 0
Professional Experience December 2005 – Present Co-Founder, Green Energy Economics Group, Inc ., Cuttingsville, VT. Consultancy specializing in energy-efficiency and renewable resource portfolios investing in electricity and gas savings, c...

AI summary The individual's professional experience spans energy efficiency, renewable resources, and civil engineering. They co-founded Green Energy Economics Group, Inc., developed cost-effectiveness models for demand-side management, and worked on energy-saving analyses. Previous roles include Senior Analyst at Optimal Energy, Inc., and civil engineering positions at Enman Engineering and Nowlan Engineering. Their work includes utility regulatory proceedings and program planning.

Massachusetts p. p. 0
Massachusetts Attorney General's Office of Ratepayer Advocacy - Reviewed pilot district geothermal project (DPU 24-114). November 2024 Present. - Provided economic, technical, and policy related consulting services to the AG's office relat...

AI summary The Attorney General's Office of Ratepayer Advocacy in Massachusetts reviewed a pilot geothermal project (DPU 24-114) and provided consulting services on energy efficiency plans (Mass Save 2025-2027) and decarbonization initiatives like the Clean Heat Standard from October 2023 to the present.

Ontario p. p. 0
Ontario Ontario Energy Board Served on the Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG): provided expert advice on efficiency program design and potential study analysis. 2023 - 2024. Small Business Utility Alliance Reviewed Enbridge DSM plan and part...

AI summary The Ontario Energy Board served the Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG) on efficiency program design (2023-2024). The Small Business Utility Alliance reviewed Enbridge's DSM plan, participated in a litigated proceeding (Matter No. EB-2021-0002, 2021-2022), and testified on program design, cost effectiveness, and stakeholder engagement.

California p. p. 0
California Small Business Utility Advocate (2020 to present) - Provided testimony on the Energy Efficiency Business Plans for the 2024-2027 Portfolio and comments on staff proposal for gas energy efficiency incentives and codes and standar...

AI summary The Small Business Utility Advocate (2020–present) provided testimony and comments on energy efficiency programs, gas incentives, clean energy financing, and CleanPowerSF's Food Service Program design. Key docket numbers include 22-02-005, 20-08-022, and R13-11-05.

Vermont p. p. 0
Vermont - Reviewed and analyzed program proposals for the Community Energy & Efficiency Development Fund (CEED Fund), including the development of scoring and rebalancing mechanisms and reviewing and revising cost-effectiveness analyses fo...

AI summary Activities include analyzing the Community Energy & Efficiency Development Fund (CEED Fund) proposals, developing cost-effectiveness models for energy efficiency programs, supporting Efficiency Vermont's operations, and assisting Vermont Gas Systems' transition. Work spans 2000–2017, focusing on energy efficiency, reliability gap assessments, and technical tool development for utilities in Vermont.

New Jersey p. p. 0
New Jersey Participated in developing the analysis for electric and natural gas energy efficiency potential in New Jersey for the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities. 2019.

AI summary Participation in developing energy efficiency potential analysis for electric and natural gas in New Jersey for the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities in 2019.

Pennsylvania p. p. 0
Pennsylvania Program design, implementation planning, regulatory support, technical reference manual development and portfolio cost-effectiveness tool for Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania. Assisted - with testimony before the Pennsylvania Publ...

AI summary Activities include program design, regulatory support, and testimony preparation for energy companies in Pennsylvania before the PUC. Involves Columbia Gas, Philadelphia Gas Works, UGI Gas, and Peoples Natural Gas, with multiple docket numbers spanning 2006–2022. Focuses on energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness analysis, and portfolio design.

Wisconsin p. p. 0
Wisconsin Portfolio and project cost-effectiveness calculator development. Cost-effectiveness analysis, assistance with contractor selection and regulatory support for 3-year energy-efficiency portfolio for Focus on Energy in Wisconsin. Ju...

AI summary A 3-year energy-efficiency portfolio project for Focus on Energy in Wisconsin (2011–2013) involved developing a cost-effectiveness calculator, conducting analyses, supporting contractor selection, and providing regulatory assistance.

Louisiana p. p. 0
Louisiana Empirical costs projections and cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative energy-efficiency resource acquisition scenarios for Entergy New Orleans, prepared for the Alliance for Affordable Energy and submitted as comments to the...

AI summary Empirical cost projections and cost-effectiveness analysis of energy-efficiency resource acquisition scenarios for Entergy New Orleans were prepared by the Alliance for Affordable Energy and submitted to the City Council in April-May 2013 as part of a regulatory proceeding.

Texas p. p. 0
Texas - Cost and savings analysis on proposed Public Utility Commission rules for utilities pursuing statutory DSM savings goals, on behalf of the Sierra Club. May-June 2012. - Analysis of and report on achievable savings and costs for Aus...

AI summary Analysis of Texas Public Utility Commission rules on DSM savings goals for utilities, conducted for the Sierra Club (May-June 2012), and a report on energy efficiency resource acquisition options for Austin Energy, commissioned by the Austin City Council (April 2012). Both efforts focus on cost and achievable savings assessments.

Illinois p. p. 0
Illinois Portfolio and project cost-effectiveness calculator development. Cost-effectiveness analysis, assistance with contractor selection and regulatory support for 3-year energy-efficiency portfolio for Peoples Gas in Illinois. Septembe...

AI summary Development of a cost-effectiveness calculator for Peoples Gas Illinois' 3-year energy-efficiency portfolio (2008-2012), including analysis, contractor selection support, and regulatory assistance.

Oklahoma p. p. 0
Oklahoma - Energy efficiency potential analysis in support of comments on PUC rulemaking regarding DSM programs on behalf of the Sierra Club, December 2013 – January 2014. - Analysis, technical assistance and testimony support on potential...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency analyses conducted between 2011 and 2014 on behalf of the Sierra Club, focusing on substituting fossil fuel generation with energy efficiency investments in Oklahoma. These efforts supported proceedings before the Oklahoma Commerce Commission and PUC rulemaking regarding demand-side management (DSM) programs.

Florida p. p. 0
Florida Analysis and assistance with direct testimony on the effect of economically achievable energy efficiency on the need for new coal-fired generation, on behalf of the Sierra Club and other environmental intervenors, Florida Public Se...

AI summary Analysis on energy efficiency's impact on coal-fired generation needs for Florida's Sierra Club and environmental intervenors, under Florida Public Service Commission Docket No. 070098-EI (March-April 2007). The PSC denied the certificate of public good in June 2007.

British Columbia, Canada p. p. 0
British Columbia, Canada Analysis and testimony support on FortisBC Gas and FortisBC Electric long-term DSM plans, submitted to the British Columbia Utilities Commission, on behalf of the BC Sustainable Energy Association and Sierra Club (...

AI summary Analysis and testimony support were provided to the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) by the BC Sustainable Energy Association and Sierra Club (BC Chapter) on various utility DSM plans (FortisBC, BC Hydro, Terasen Gas) from 2006 to 2014, assessing their adequacy, reasonableness, and energy-efficiency outcomes.

People's Republic of China p. p. 0
People's Republic of China - Developed portfolio and project economic and financial analysis tools for use in China, and provided remote and in-person training sessions on use. For Natural Resources Defense Council and Institute for Sustai...

AI summary The text details work on energy efficiency projects in China, including economic analysis tools for the Natural Resources Defense Council, efficiency retrofits for Guangdong's Economic and Trade Commission, and prefeasibility studies for an Asian Development Bank loan. Projects involved Jiangsu province, Shanghai municipality, and Efficiency Power Plant assessments.

PRIOR ASSIGNMENTS (RESOURCE INSIGHT) – 1992-1996 p. p. 0
PRIOR ASSIGNMENTS (RESOURCE INSIGHT) – 1992-1996 - Technical assistance on DSM program development in the Potomac Electric Power Company collaborative, for the Maryland Office of People's Counsel. Work included characterizing new energy-ef...

AI summary The text details technical contributions to DSM program development (1992–1996), including cost-effectiveness analysis, program design, and regulatory support. Key activities involve commercial/industrial energy efficiency measures, IRP reviews, and stakeholder negotiations. Entities include utilities, regulatory bodies, and environmental organizations.

E-11Evidence of Eastward Energy 3 passages
Participation in the DSMAG p. p. 3
Nova Scotia Power Evergreen IRP Final Modeling Results (May 29, 2023),](https://www.nspower.ca/docs/default-source/irp/evergreen-irp-final-modeling-results-2023.pdf?sfvrsn=7dd208d8_1) page 62 of PDF - NSPI's consultant E3 recognized the va...

AI summary NSPI's consultant E3 highlights the need to incentivize dual-fuel heat pumps to mitigate grid impacts from electrification. Eastward, as a regulated utility, emphasizes energy efficiency and explores RNG and hydrogen blending to reduce emissions. These initiatives are relevant to the DSMAG's considerations.

Figure 6 p. p. 4
Figure 6 Estimated Percentage of Time on the Margin by Type of Generation Type of Generation 2014 (%) 2015 (%) 2016 (%) 2017 (%) 2018 (%) 2019 (%) 2020 (%) 2021 (%) 2022 (%) 2023 (%) 2024 (%) Combustion Turbines (CTs) (diesel-fired) 1 1 0...

AI summary The text discusses the inappropriateness of using average emissions rates for future incremental generation, as coal, heavy fuel oil, and natural gas/fuel oil combustion turbines will serve this generation at low efficiencies. It argues that marginal generation emissions are a more appropriate and representative approach, noting that hybrid heating systems using natural gas infrastructure operate at over 90% efficiency.

Conclusion p. pp. 6-7
Conclusion 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 16 Eastward provides the following points to summarize its position on this matter: - Participation in DSMAG - Eastward's involvement in the DSMAG would pose no further conflict of interest than wha...

AI summary Eastward argues its DSMAG participation poses no greater conflict of interest than NSPI's. It highlights expertise in hybrid heating, natural gas systems, and GHG reduction via hydrogen/RNG blending. The GDA and More Access to Energy Act support hybrid heating for demand management. Eastward aligns with NSPI's IRP analysis and E1's 2027–2031 DSM Plan goals.

E-12Evidence of Posterity Group Consulting, on behalf of Eastward Energy 3 passages
Benefits of Hybrid Heating p. pp. 1-3
- The Quebec Government recognized the importance of hybrid heating in its 2030 Plan for a Green Economy: "Fully electrifying heating would not be ideal for Québec. It would create a significant peak demand issue at certain times during th...

AI summary The text discusses the benefits of hybrid heating systems, citing examples from Quebec, Ontario, and FortisBC. It highlights concerns about full electrification of heating, such as increased peak demand and costs, and the need for natural gas as a complementary energy source for reliability and grid stability.

1 Table 1: Illustrative Example - Hybrid System Replacing Electric Resistance Heating p. pp. 3-4
1 Table 1: Illustrative Example - Hybrid System Replacing Electric Resistance Heating Category Impact Basis for Estimation Hybrid Replacing Electric Resistance Baseboard Heaters (E1 Costs) Hybrid Replacing Electric Resistance Baseboard Hea...

AI summary Table 1 compares costs and benefits of hybrid systems replacing electric resistance heating in Nova Scotia. It includes avoided costs, environmental compliance, financial incentives, and other factors. EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power (NSP) are key entities, with calculations involving energy generation, transmission, and distribution impacts. The Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) highlights a 4.10 ratio for E1 costs and 4.53 for E3 costs.

1 Table 2: Illustrative Example - Hybrid System Replacing Fuel Oil Furnaces p. pp. 4-5
1 Table 2: Illustrative Example - Hybrid System Replacing Fuel Oil Furnaces Nova Scotia Test ($Million), 2% Social Discount Rate, Using 2023-2025 Avoided Costs: Example based on 1,000 Hybrid Systems Replacing Fuel Oil Furnaces, Program Yea...

AI summary Table 2 presents a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) of a hybrid system replacing fuel oil furnaces, showing net benefits with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.21 for E1 costs and 2.27 for E3 costs. The analysis includes energy generation, capacity, environmental impacts, financial incentives, and other factors such as avoided heating oil costs and health impacts from greenhouse gas emissions.

E-13Evidence of M. Whitten - SBA 2 passages
1 expanded list of factors beyond what is mentioned in recent legislation, on the basis that p. pp. 8-9
1 expanded list of factors beyond what is mentioned in recent legislation, on the basis that 2 the BCA it serves the interests of ratepayers and provides a framework for the Board to 3 assess future DSM plans. 7 4 5 Q. How does E1 justify...

AI summary The document discusses how E1 justifies the recent regulatory changes supporting their proposed BCA test framework, noting the amendment to the Public Utilities Act, which expanded the definition of demand-side management to include strategic electrification programs aimed at reducing GHG emissions and electricity costs.

Table 1: Host Customer Impacts p. pp. 10-11
Table 1: Host Customer Impacts Host Customer Impact Description/Meeting Notes Inclusion in new BCA Economic well-being Energy bill savings reducing stress of disconnections, foreclosures, etc. create direct and induced economic benefits. ✓...

AI summary The table outlines host customer impacts such as economic well-being, comfort, amenity, health and safety, empowerment, and pride, with inclusion in a new benefit-cost analysis (BCA). The document also references exhibits and raises a question about how EfficiencyOne (E1) proposes to quantify non-energy benefits using proxy values.

E-14Evidence of P. Bowman, on behalf of IG - Revised (Old evidence filed under E-8) 5 passages
1 customers qua customer interests (e.g., price, reliability, availability, etc.) which appears to be
1 customers qua customer interests (e.g., price, reliability, availability, etc.) which appears to be 2 consistent with the Board's earlier determinations as well.4 This does not appear to prohibit the 3 Board taking into account any numbe...

AI summary The text discusses the Board's consideration of customer interests, including price, reliability, and availability, in line with earlier determinations. It emphasizes that the Board must prioritize the best interests of NSPI customers while adhering to the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act and other legislation promoting competition, innovation, and sustainable development.

1 For conversion of electric resistance heating to heat pumps (energy efficiency):
1 For conversion of electric resistance heating to heat pumps (energy efficiency): Proposed BCA (societal perspective) PAC (utility and its customers perspective) Benefits = NPV of avoided electric generation and capacity costs, avoided tr...

AI summary The document outlines a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) and Public Acceptability Criterion (PAC) for converting electric resistance heating to heat pumps. It considers benefits such as avoided generation and transmission costs, health impacts, and GHG reductions, while also accounting for installation and program administration costs.

4 For conversion of fuel oil heating to heat pumps (beneficial electrification):
4 For conversion of fuel oil heating to heat pumps (beneficial electrification): Proposed BCA (societal perspective) PAC (utility and its customers perspective, including revenue) Benefits = NPV of avoided fuel oil purchase, avoided GHG gl...

AI summary The document presents a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) and Public Acceptability Criterion (PAC) for converting fuel oil heating to heat pumps. Benefits include avoided fuel costs and GHG emissions, while costs involve infrastructure upgrades and program administration. From the utility's perspective, benefits include added revenue, while costs remain similar.

Is there any relevance to measurements considering rate impacts, such as a RIM test?
Is there any relevance to measurements considering rate impacts, such as a RIM test? - A RIM test should not be applied as a screening test for energy efficiency, as it can derive excessively - narrow metrics and fail to measure proper cos...

AI summary The discussion addresses the use of RIM tests for energy efficiency, arguing against their use as a screening tool due to narrow metrics. However, E1 should report rate impacts at various levels for the Board's assessment.

What recommendations do you have?
What recommendations do you have? Based on the above considerations, I provide the following conclusions and recommendations for the Board: - 1) The current primary TRC test is limited in its ability to singularly inform the Board about es...

AI summary The text provides recommendations for the Board regarding the use of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) tests in evaluating DSM activities. It suggests using the PAC test as the primary energy efficiency test, rejecting the E1 BCA test as a primary test, and incorporating multiple tests for balanced evaluation. It also highlights the importance of using NSPI WACC as the discount rate and ensuring accurate GHG emission calculations.

E-15Letters of Comment 8 passages
Preamble p. pp. 0-3
Nova Scotia Energy Board Clerk of the Board P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, N.S. B3J 3S3 [email protected] Re: An application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a New Benefit-Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM)...

AI summary Efficiency Canada submits comments on EfficiencyOne's application for a new benefit-cost analysis test for DSM plans in Nova Scotia. The submission highlights their role as national policy analysts, ongoing review of Canadian energy efficiency policies, and preliminary findings. Authors include Brendan Haley, Carol Maas, and Katharine Turner, with ties to Nova Scotia energy policy and EfficiencyOne.

Utility/program administrator Primary cost effectiveness test Benefit adders and/or consideration of non-energy benefits p. p. 1
Utility/program administrator Primary cost effectiveness test Benefit adders and/or consideration of non-energy benefits BC Hydro PAC Pre-2023 policy included a 15% benefit adder to the TRC FortisBC Energy (natural gas) FortisBC Inc. (elec...

AI summary The table outlines primary cost-effectiveness tests and benefit adders for various utility and program administrators. It includes entities like BC Hydro, FortisBC Energy, and Efficiency Manitoba, with details on their respective policies and adders to the Total Resource Cost (TRC).

The multiple benefits of energy efficiency p. pp. 3-4
The multiple benefits of energy efficiency The International Energy Agency has highlighted that energy efficiency improvements produce multiple benefits for customers, society, and the environment.4 It does not make sense to have a cost-ef...

AI summary Energy efficiency offers multifaceted benefits, including non-financial advantages for customers and society. Nova Scotia's cost-effectiveness tests must account for these benefits, not just customer costs. E1's framework is praised for focusing on specific benefits, allowing alignment with policy goals. Low-income households and resilience are highlighted as priority areas, with recommendations to adjust benefit quantification as technologies evolve.

Discount rate p. pp. 4-5
Discount rate Using the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as a discount rate on the cost-effectiveness test appears particularly ill-suited to Nova Scotia. The WACC represents a discount rate associated with the goal of maximizing ut...

AI summary The text argues that using the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as a discount rate in Nova Scotia's cost-effectiveness test prioritizes utility investor returns over public and provincial interests. It advocates for a social discount rate aligned with sustainable development and intergenerational equity, citing the Energy Reform Acts. EfficiencyOne's localized energy poverty data is recommended for consideration.

Avoided costs p. pp. 5-6
Avoided costs Utility system avoided costs will remain one of the most material benefits of energy efficiency programs. Across jurisdictions, these avoided costs are often not transparent and misaligned with forward-looking utility system...

AI summary Avoided costs from energy efficiency programs are critical but often lack transparency and alignment with future utility risks. The Independent Electricity System Operator's (IESO) approach to calculating avoided costs could improve accuracy, with recommendations for technical review committees to ensure stakeholder accountability.

Strategic or unstrategic electrification? p. pp. 6-7
Strategic or unstrategic electrification? A renewed cost-effectiveness test is particularly important for Nova Scotia to make sound decisions about managing electrification. The proposed test enables the inclusion of other fuel impacts alo...

AI summary Nova Scotia seeks a renewed cost-effectiveness test to evaluate electrification's strategic value by incorporating multi-fuel impacts. Efficiency Canada's report emphasizes aligning energy efficiency with net-zero goals across fuels. Efficiency Nova Scotia is positioned to balance interests as a multi-fuel administrator, mitigating electricity system costs through integrated programs like demand response and heat pumps.

Learning from the past by accounting for the future p. p. 7
Learning from the past by accounting for the future Re-balancing Nova Scotia's cost-effectiveness test has a particular salience for one of our co-authors (Brendan Haley). Acting as an intervener for the Ecology Action Centre during the 20...

AI summary The document discusses the 2007 Nova Scotia Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process, highlighting concerns about the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test's exclusion of customer benefits in Demand Side Management (DSM) cost assessments. Ecology Action Centre (EAC) intervenor Brendan Haley criticized the unbalanced methodology, which led to an arbitrary decision by Nova Scotia Power. The text advocates for updating the Nova Scotia Test framework to adapt to evolving DSM strategies and ensure comprehensive cost-benefit analysis.

Mi'kmaq Perspective p. p. 9
Mi'kmaq Perspective From a Mi'kmaq perspective, this represents a positive step toward equitable program design. By valuing more than just kilowatt-hours, the new BCA test provides a framework that allows DSM programs to better serve Mi'km...

AI summary The Mi'kmaq perspective highlights the BCA test's potential to improve DSM program design for Mi'kmaq communities but criticizes the lack of explicit inclusion of Mi'kmaq circumstances in the filing. They recommend collaboration with EfficiencyOne to address unique challenges, including poverty, land dispossession, and infrastructure gaps, and emphasize the need for tailored support to advance self-determination and NetZero goals.

E-19IG (NSEB) RIR 1 to 4 2 passages
11 For conversion of electric resistance heating to heat pumps (energy efficiency): p. p. 1
11 For conversion of electric resistance heating to heat pumps (energy efficiency): Proposed BCA (societal perspective) TRC including Non-Energy Benefits (utility and its customers + participant perspective) PAC (utility and its customers...

AI summary The document compares cost-benefit analyses (BCA, TRC, PAC) for converting electric resistance heating to heat pumps. Benefits include avoided generation/capacity costs, transmission/distribution savings, health impacts, and GHG reductions. Costs involve installation, program administration, and taxes. Perspectives vary between societal, utility/customer, and host customer viewpoints.

Response: p. p. 4
Response: - From the outset, the focus should be on the fundamental E1 transaction, which is spending on - subsidies and programs towards energy efficiency and electrification. - Anyone can undertake energy efficiency activities at any tim...

AI summary The response emphasizes that E1's role is to provide incentives and share information to boost energy efficiency and electrification, not achieve these goals directly. It argues that PAC is a more accurate measure of E1's cost-effectiveness than TRC, which overemphasizes participant spending and overlooks E1's incentive programs. The Energy Board's focus on cost-effectiveness aligns with PAC's targeted evaluation.

E-20IG (Synapse) RIR 1 to 3 3 passages
Preamble p. p. 2
2025 M12282 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for approval of a New Benefit- Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management Plans RESPONSES TO IN...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks approval for a new benefit-cost analysis test for evaluating demand side management plans. Synapse Energy Economics requests information on how energy efficiency measures impact utility revenues, differences in treating electrification measures, and jurisdictional practices regarding BCA tests and the PAC test.

Response: p. pp. 2-3
Board should only ever look at the portfolio level (which appears to be contrary to the definition of Demand Side Management under s.79A(b) of the Act, which includes activities, programs, and plans). To be clear, Mr. Bowman's proposal is...

AI summary The text argues that the Board should assess electrification at the portfolio level, conflicting with DSM definitions under the Act. Mr. Bowman proposes including electrification revenues as benefits, contrasting with energy efficiency programs that avoid NSP fuel costs. The ACEEE database is referenced, noting states include lost revenues in BCA tests.

Request IR-3: p. p. 5
Request IR-3: - Refer to the Evidence of Patrick Bowman at page 18, which states "A RIM test should not - be applied as a screening test for energy efficiency, as it can derive excessively narrow - metrics and fail to measure proper cost-e...

AI summary Patrick Bowman's evidence challenges the use of the RIM test for energy efficiency, arguing it produces narrow metrics. The proceeding questions why revenue changes in the PAC test are appropriate and how it differs from RIM. Key issues involve cost-effectiveness methodologies and regulatory testing frameworks.

E-22CV - Chris Neme - E1 4 passages
Professional Summary p. p. 0
Professional Summary Chris specializes in analysis of markets for energy efficiency, demand response, renewable energy and strategic electrification measures, as well as the design and evaluation of programs and policies – including climat...

AI summary Chris has over 25 years of experience in energy efficiency, demand response, renewable energy, and strategic electrification. He has worked globally with regulators, utilities, and governments, testified in 75+ regulatory cases, and authored reports on clean energy policies, including a national standard practice manual for distributed energy resources.

Selected Projects p. p. 0
Selected Projects - Natural Resources Defense Council (Illinois, Michigan and Ohio). Critically review energy efficiency, demand response, electrification, distribution system investment and integrated resource plans filed by IL, MI and OH...

AI summary The document outlines two key projects: Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) engaging in energy efficiency reviews, regulatory testimony, and legislative support in Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio from 2010 to present. E4TheFuture co-authored the National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) for distributed energy resources (DERs) and conducted training from 2016 to present, with updates expected in 2025.

Energy Futures Group, Inc p. pp. 1-5
asing proposals. (1993 to present) - Connecticut Energy Efficiency Board. Part of team providing on-going review and input on utility efficiency program planning and related policy issues. Lead role in providing input on New England Avoide...

AI summary Energy Futures Group, Inc. has engaged in energy policy and program development across multiple jurisdictions, including Connecticut, Vermont, Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. Key activities include leading clean heat standard initiatives, updating benefit-cost analysis frameworks for energy efficiency, and providing technical analysis on building electrification and grid capacity.

Selected Publications and Reports p. pp. 5-8
Selected Publications and Reports - National Standard Practice Manual for Benefit Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resources , Second Edition, to be published December 2025 (with Tim Woolf and others) - New Jersey's Electric Grid Has He...

AI summary The document lists publications and reports on energy efficiency, distributed energy resources (DERs), and clean heat standards (CHS). Key topics include benefit-cost analysis of DERs, building decarbonization, residential electrification, and heat pump adoption. Reports are authored by individuals and organizations such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund, and Vermont Energy Action Network.

E-23CV - Chris Pulfer, P.Eng. - EE 5 passages
Experience Summary p. p. 0
Experience Summary Chris brings a collaborative approach to his work, leveraging client knowledge and resources to ensure sound, actionable results. He has spent his career working to identify opportunities for energy efficiency, character...

AI summary Chris has extensive experience in energy efficiency and demand management, leading studies on energy conservation potential across six provinces and territories. He specializes in technical analysis, modelling, and project management for commercial and institutional sectors, along with conducting market and prefeasibility studies on energy solutions.

Energy Efficiency Technology and Market Research p. pp. 0-2
Energy Efficiency Technology and Market Research - Year 8 Building Energy Benchmarking: City of Edmonton (Nov. 2024 ongoing) - Building Controls Program Design Support: FortisBC (Jun. 2024 November 2024) - 2024 Conservation Potential Revie...

AI summary The document outlines multiple energy efficiency and market research initiatives underway in 2023-2025, involving organizations like FortisBC, Fortis Energy Inc., Natural Resources Canada, and others. Projects include building benchmarking, conservation reviews, retrofit studies, and grid integration analyses, spanning provinces and focusing on residential, commercial, and transportation sectors.

Energy Efficiency Program Design, Administration and Support p. pp. 2-3
Energy Efficiency Program Design, Administration and Support - Custom Efficiency Program (CEP) Update: FortisBC (Nov. 2023-ongoing) - Achievable Potential Study (Ad Hoc) Support: Enbridge Gas (September 2023 ongoing) - Resource Plan and Lo...

AI summary The document lists energy efficiency programs and initiatives undertaken by various organizations from 2010 to 2023, focusing on program design, administration, and support. Key participants include FortisBC, Enbridge Gas, FCM, CMHC, and IESO, with projects spanning residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal sectors. Efforts include DSM planning, retrofit programs, GHG accounting, and incentive development.

Strategic Planning for Energy Management p. p. 3
Strategic Planning for Energy Management - Review of Building Energy Mapping Applications: Natural Resources Canada Buildings and Renewables, CanmetENERGY Ottawa (Feb. 2021-Apr. 2021) - DSM Planning Support: Enbridge Gas Inc. (Jan. 2021-Ja...

AI summary The document outlines a series of energy management and efficiency initiatives led by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), FortisBC, Enbridge Gas, and other organizations between 2007 and 2021. Projects include building energy mapping, demand forecasting, conservation potential studies, and development of energy retrofit guidelines. Key partners include Fortis Energy Inc., CEATI International, and the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO).

Transportation Energy Efficiency Technology and Market Research p. pp. 3-5
Transportation Energy Efficiency Technology and Market Research - Environmental and Health Impacts of Small Gasoline Powered versus Electric Powered Mobile Outdoor Equipment in Canada: Environment and Climate Change Canada (Feb. 2021-May 2...

AI summary The document lists studies on transportation energy efficiency in Canada, including environmental impacts of outdoor equipment, fuel-saving measures in heavy-duty vehicles, EnerGuide label accuracy, and vehicle technology assessments. Research was conducted by Environment and Climate Change Canada, Transport Canada, and Natural Resources Canada's Office of Energy Efficiency between 2012 and 2021.

E-24Rebuttal Evidence of E1 including Appendix A - Energy Futures Group Rebuttal Evidence 2 passages
E1 Response p. pp. 5-7
to provide justification on why any such measure falls below the 1.0 threshold when the BCA test is applied. Such information will inform decisions regarding inclusion of programs and measures, given Government of Nova Scotia, Department o...

AI summary The document discusses the need to justify measures below a 1.0 BCA threshold for inclusion in programs. It references Nova Scotia's legislative efforts to modernize its electricity system, including the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act. The government emphasizes strategic electrification, efficiency programs for low-income households, and environmental protection as key policy goals.

E1 Response p. pp. 19-20
E1 Response The approach E1 is proposing in the 'evergreen' process for calculating the emissions intensity of DSM savings for the purposes of benefit cost analyses is the Difference in Carbon Emissions (DICE) method. This approach conside...

AI summary E1 proposes using the Difference in Carbon Emissions (DICE) method for calculating the emissions intensity of DSM savings in benefit-cost analyses, aligning with NSPM guidance and IRP assumptions. E1 clarifies that an illustrative example of gas-to-electric conversions by Eastward Energy does not reflect actual results and would require justification if included in future DSM plans.

E-26Opening Statement - CA 1 passage
M12282 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and - IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION by EFFICIENCYONE for approval of a New Benefit-Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management Plans OPENING STATEM...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate supports a new Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Test for evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans proposed by EfficiencyOne, but recommends that the new test be vetted with stakeholders and that internalized and externalized costs of carbon be treated separately. The Board will need to address several issues, including the appropriateness of the test and the justification for proxy values used.

E-27Opening Statement - IG 1 passage
9 COUNSEL OPENING STATEMENT 10 ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP p. p. 0
9 COUNSEL OPENING STATEMENT 10 ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP 11 As required by the Public Utilities Act , NSPI is required to undertake cost-effective, reasonably - 12 available, demand side management (" DSM ") by entering into a purc...

AI summary The Industrial Group argues against the Proposed E1 BCA test, which incorporates non-energy benefits and societal impacts, and instead recommends the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test as the primary measure of cost-effectiveness for demand side management (DSM) programs. They emphasize alignment with Canadian regulatory practices and the best interests of customers.

E-33Venn Diagram 1 passage
Energy Efficiency Tests Per Illustrative Example of 1,000 Heat Pump Replacements - as compared to Electric Resistance Heating p. pp. 0-1
Energy Efficiency Tests Per Illustrative Example of 1,000 Heat Pump Replacements - as compared to Electric Resistance Heating

AI summary The document presents an illustrative example comparing energy efficiency outcomes of replacing 1,000 electric resistance heating systems with heat pumps. It uses a figure to highlight potential benefits of heat pumps over traditional electric resistance heating in a regulatory proceeding context.

100256Board Decision 2 passages
3.2 Industrial Group p. p. 16
impacts E1's programming and planning, is the addition of strategic electrification as part of the definition of DSM." It said the Public Utilities Act focus remained on reducing electricity costs. [37] The addition of strategic electrific...

AI summary The Industrial Group argues that adding strategic electrification to DSM under the Public Utilities Act should not expand the NSUARB's jurisdiction to consider non-energy benefits. It emphasizes the Act's focus on reducing electricity costs and maintains the Board's existing discretion in evaluating DSM plans. The Group also clarifies that 'sustainable development' considerations under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act do not grant the Board authority over societal benefits.

The current version is: p. p. 40
mandate to consider nonutility impacts in the assessment of cost-effectiveness and says that incorporating sustainability-focused factors into regulatory decision-making is now the law in Nova Scotia: As explained above, the Energy and Reg...

AI summary The Energy Reform Act and related legislation mandate the Energy Board to incorporate sustainability factors into regulatory decisions, including environmental impacts, energy efficiency, and green job creation. This shifts the focus from purely cost-effectiveness to broader sustainability goals, aligning with definitions of 'sustainable development' and 'sustainable prosperity'.

97702Letter EOne re: Application for Approval of Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans 1 passage
Section 3 p. p. 0
t , SNS 2024, c 2 received Royal Assent. This legislation expanded the list of factors for the Board to consider in relation to all applications. Included among this list of factors are the following: - a) energy efficiency - b) sustainabl...

AI summary The legislation received Royal Assent in 2024 expanded the factors the Board must consider in applications, including energy efficiency, sustainable development, and greenhouse gas emissions reductions. These changes informed the development of a new BCA test by the DSMAG, which EfficiencyOne now recommends for approval by the Board.

97956Participant List 1 passage
EFFICIENCYONE
EFFICIENCYONE

AI summary The document heading 'EFFICIENCYONE' indicates a regulatory proceeding involving an entity or program named EfficiencyOne. No further details, arguments, or citations are provided in the text.

98028Synapse (E1) IR 1 to 24 1 passage
Request IR-21:
Request IR-21: - Refer to Table 17 on page 49 of the EFG report. - a. Table 17 indicates that electric vehicles (EV) do not provide resilience benefits. Did the DSMAG or EFG consider vehicle-to-building applications, such as using EV batte...

AI summary Request IR-21 questions whether EV resilience benefits were considered, specifically vehicle-to-building applications, and why public health impacts differ between EVs and building electrification. References Table 17 from the EFG report and seeks clarification on resilience and public health materiality.

98032EE (E1) IR 1 to 12 3 passages
Reference: General
Reference: General - (a) How does the benefit-cost test capture the cost of additional pressure on meeting the increased electric utility peak demand caused by any "strategic electrification", such as required electric system infrastructur...

AI summary The text raises questions about how the benefit-cost test accounts for infrastructure upgrades due to strategic electrification, coordination between E1 and the electric utility's planning department, and whether hybrid peaking or dual fuel opportunities were evaluated in the application.

Section 9
- (b) For the "direct measure costs" impact, the "Basis for Estimation" column includes the description "Host customer measure costs net of incentives". Please explain what should be considered in the calculation of "Host customer measure...

AI summary The text requests clarification on the calculation of 'Host customer measure cost' for direct measure costs, including equipment, installation, and maintenance costs. It also asks whether the $4.8M figure represents the full or incremental cost of 1000 heat pumps and seeks discussion on how reliability impacts of measures that increase peak load are reflected in avoided costs, and if this practice is consistent with E1's current approach.

Preamble
- Reference: Appendix B, Table 14 - (a) Please explain why the NEB proxy adders recommended are appropriate for Nova Scotia. - (b) Please describe the potential risk increase to the host customer that is derived from "strategic electrifica...

AI summary The text requests an explanation of the appropriateness of NEB proxy adders for Nova Scotia and an assessment of the risks associated with strategic electrification for host customers.

98033NSEB (E1) IR 1 to 46 6 passages
Request IR-7:
Request IR-7: - On page 18 of 38 of E1's Evidence, a hyperlink to the "National Energy Screening Project (NESP), National Standard Practice Manual (NSPM) for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource" is provided: - a) Please de...

AI summary Request IR-7 seeks information on the National Energy Screening Project (NESP), deviations from the NSPM in the proposed BCA test, use of the MTR handbook for quantifying benefits/costs, and data from the DSPs on states' adoption of NSPM, SCT, and resilience metrics in energy efficiency evaluations.

Request IR-16:
Request IR-16: - Table 8: Host Customer Impacts, please elaborate on the following terms and definitions relating - to energy efficiency: - a) Asset Value - b) O&M costs - c) Productivity - d) Economic well being - e) Comfort - f) Amenity...

AI summary Request IR-16 seeks clarification on definitions in Table 8 related to energy efficiency impacts, including asset value, O&M costs, productivity, economic well-being, comfort, amenity, empowerment, and pride. The request focuses on elaborating these terms for host customer analysis.

Request IR-17:
Request IR-17: - Please provide supporting empirical evidence demonstrating causation for the following Host - Customer Impacts: - a) energy efficiency investments and increases in business productivity in industries that operate in Nova S...

AI summary The document requests empirical evidence linking energy efficiency investments in Nova Scotia to increased business productivity, economic benefits, and health/safety improvements, emphasizing the need for causation.

Request IR-18:
Request IR-18: - Table 9: Societal Impacts, please elaborate on the following terms and definitions relating to - energy efficiency: - a) Resilience - b) Other Environmental - i. Please differentiate between Greenhouse Gas Emissions - c) P...

AI summary Request IR-18 seeks clarification on societal impact terms in Table 9, focusing on energy efficiency aspects like resilience, greenhouse gas emissions, public health, and energy security. It requests differentiation between greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental factors.

Request IR-19:
Request IR-19: - Please provide supporting empirical evidence demonstrating causation for the following Societal - Impacts: - a) energy efficiency investments and changes in medical outcomes and costs.

AI summary Request IR-19 seeks empirical evidence linking energy efficiency investments to changes in medical outcomes and costs, emphasizing the need for causation demonstration in societal impact assessments.

Request IR-42:
Request IR-42: - In reference to Table 14, please provide empirical evidence demonstrating cause between the - measure type and the customer segment. - Request IR-43: - With regards to Table 15 on page 47 of 68 of EFG's report, please expl...

AI summary The document contains five requests (IR-42 to IR-46) seeking clarifications on empirical evidence, definitions (e.g., weatherization), energy security linkages, air quality benefit comparisons between Nova Scotia and New England, and implications of Canada's carbon tax abolition on E1's cost calculations. Key entities include E1, Nova Scotia Power, and Environment Canada.

98036SBA (E1) IR 1 to 20 1 passage
- b) Please note for each category's impact how it was measured for Nova Scotia, as
- b) Please note for each category's impact how it was measured for Nova Scotia, as 1 2 compared with adopting something used in other provinces or in a US State. 3 Request IR-11: 4 5 Regarding Exhibit E-1, the Application, page 26 of 38,...

AI summary The text outlines various requests for information related to the impact measurement of categories in Nova Scotia, including definitions and examples for terms such as 'Host Benefits', 'Resilience', 'Public Health', 'improved comfort', and 'health'. It also requests explanations on how certain benefits are monetized for the BCA Test and how terms like 'resiliency' and 'reliability' are defined and contrasted.

98098IG (E1) IR 1 to 16 1 passage
- 28 (b) Please compare the new BCA test against the current TRC test for the 29 three examples provided in section 11 of E1's Evidence.
- 28 (b) Please compare the new BCA test against the current TRC test for the 29 three examples provided in section 11 of E1's Evidence. 1 2 (i) In the calculation provided, do the "non-energy impacts" outweigh the "energy-related" impacts...

AI summary The text requests a comparison between the new BCA test and the current TRC test using examples from E1's Evidence. It also asks whether the new BCA test will consider costs related to increased supply requirements and future electrification.

98574Letter from CA asking the Board to qualify Mr. Wyatt as expert witness 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
Please refer to: David Roberts Email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Assistant: McKayla Cameron Assistant's email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) July 17, 2025 VIA EMAIL Crystal Henwood...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate submits evidence from Francis Wyatt of Green Energy Economics Group, requesting the Nova Scotia Energy Board to qualify him as an expert witness on energy efficiency programs. This is Wyatt's first expert testimony to the Board. The proceeding relates to Matter M12282, concerning a new benefit-cost analysis test.

98794IG (SBA) IR 1 to 2 1 passage
1 (i) Does this mean energy system benefits (e.g., increased
1 (i) Does this mean energy system benefits (e.g., increased 2 reliability, avoided new investment in generation, etc.), or 3 does it include other societal benefits, such as the comfort 4 and pride of E1 program participants? - 5 (b) Does...

AI summary The text questions whether energy system benefits, such as reliability and avoided new generation investment, are included in the definition of energy system benefits, or if other societal benefits like comfort and pride of E1 program participants are also considered. It also asks if Ms. Whitten's testimony supports the idea that DSM costs are appropriately incurred and paid for by NSPI customers to support societal and participant-specific non-utility benefits.

98801Synapse (IG) IR 1 to 3 2 passages
Request IR-1:
Request IR-1: - Refer to the Evidence of Patrick Bowman at page 14, which describes the PAC including the benefits of added utility revenue for electrification measures. - a. Do energy efficiency measures impact utility revenues? - b. Why...

AI summary The document references Patrick Bowman's evidence on PAC and its benefits for utility revenue from electrification. It includes four questions about energy efficiency's impact on revenues, treatment of electrification measures, other jurisdictions' BCA tests, and use of PAC as a primary test.

Request IR-3:
Request IR-3: - Refer to the Evidence of Patrick Bowman at page 18, which states "A RIM test should not be applied as a screening test for energy efficiency, as it can derive excessively narrow metrics and fail to measure proper cost-effec...

AI summary Patrick Bowman argues against using the RIM test as a screening tool for energy efficiency due to its narrow metrics. The proceeding questions why revenue changes should be considered in the PAC test and how this differs from the RIM test's approach.

99638Closing Submission - E1 4 passages
5. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE AND HEARING RECORD p. pp. 21-22
nts do you wish to make regarding the terms of that proposed Partial Consensus Agreement? A. Only that it reflects some of the recommendations in my evidence related to reducing the proxy adders. Mr. Bowman's evidence advocates for the Pro...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) opposes using Program Administrator Cost (PAC) as the primary cost-effectiveness test at the legislatively mandated portfolio level, advocating instead for measure and program-level testing. E1 commits to providing PAC and Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) results at lower levels for the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's consideration, while Mr. Bowman's evidence supports PAC as a primary test.

6.3.2 THE IG'S PROPOSED APPROACH p. pp. 28-31
6.3.2 THE IG'S PROPOSED APPROACH - The IG's proposed approach differs from the legislated direction and context. Mr. Bowman recommends - that "[t]he primary energy efficiency test should be the PAC test, applied at the measure and program...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) proposes using the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test as the primary energy efficiency metric, alongside supplementary tests for electrification, societal impacts, and rate impacts. This approach contrasts with EfficiencyOne's (E1) broader 'societal test' framework. The IG emphasizes narrower criteria and specific cost-effectiveness metrics for DSM reviews.

1 (a) support competition and innovation in the provision of energy resources p. pp. 37-38
Public Utilities Act , RSNS 1989, c 380, s 79L(5). 1 (a) support competition and innovation in the provision of energy resources 25 (a) increase competition and innovation in the Province's energy sector; 26 (b) ensure the provision of a s...

AI summary The document outlines the objectives of the Public Utilities Act, emphasizing the promotion of competition and innovation in energy provision, ensuring reliable and economical energy supply, and supporting sustainable development and greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals as defined by the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act.

Preamble p. p. 39
Building on the provisions outlined above, E1's position is that the legislative framework not only empowers the Board to consider issues of sustainable prosperity and sustainable development, but in fact obliges it to do so as part of its...

AI summary E1 argues that the legislative framework empowers and obliges the Board to prioritize sustainable development and prosperity, as defined in statutes like the Environment Act and the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act . These laws require the Board to consider long-term societal outcomes, including energy efficiency and emissions reduction, when evaluating DSM plan applications and cost-effectiveness.

99640Closing Submission - IG 3 passages
The Board Still Cannot Account for Non-energy Benefits p. p. 9
scope to consider all environmental and societal impacts within a benefit cost test is incongruous with the mandate for franchise holders and would expand E1's role, and possibly even NSPI's testing. Similarly, the ERBA requires the Board...

AI summary The Board is criticized for not adequately considering non-energy benefits in regulatory decisions. The text argues that expanding benefit-cost analysis to include all environmental and societal impacts would conflict with franchise mandates and possibly expand E1's role. The ERBA requires the Board to consider factors like competition and innovation, but these do not expand E1's mandate under the PUA. The PUA's focus remains on cost reduction and energy efficiency, with sustainability as a supporting factor.

2. THE BOARD SHOULD NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION NON-ENERGY AND BROAD SOCIETAL IMPACTS p. pp. 10-12
2. THE BOARD SHOULD NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION NON-ENERGY AND BROAD SOCIETAL IMPACTS In the alternative, if the Board determines it has the jurisdiction to incorporate non-energy and broad societal impacts into the cost-effectiveness test...

AI summary The Industrial Group argues that the Board should not consider non-energy and broad societal impacts in evaluating Demand-Side Management (DSM). They claim this would expand Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) beyond ratepayer-focused tests, introducing unquantifiable factors. E1's proposed BCA includes non-energy benefits and carbon costs, which the Small Business Advocate's consultant opposes, aligning with the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test instead.

Broad Societal Impacts p. pp. 14-15
Broad Societal Impacts E1 also proposes to include broad societal impacts within its cost-effectiveness testing. This goes well beyond the approach taken by any other Canadian jurisdiction. The global cost of carbon as a percentage of the...

AI summary E1 proposes including global carbon costs in its BCA for energy efficiency programs, a unique approach in Canada. Critics argue this is inappropriate as Nova Scotia does not tax carbon, and the PUA mandates cost reduction, not broad societal impacts. The Industrial Group opposes integrating societal impacts into DSM cost-effectiveness tests.

99641Closing Submission - EE 5 passages
And similarly. Bowman stated: p. pp. 4-5
his program does not look great for a utility. And I believe Mr. Neme explained that this will always look bad, but this one looks particularly bad because of the heating, and it drives a lot of peak. [Posterity] came in and oh, and by the...

AI summary The text discusses a program's negative impact on a utility due to heating costs and peak demand. Posterity suggests combining heat pumps with gas peaking to reduce costs and eliminate the need for transmission and distribution infrastructure, resulting in lower net costs and passing a PAC test.

Mr. Bowman stated in this regard that: p. pp. 6-7
Mr. Bowman stated in this regard that: "If, in step three, your test is going to be the social test, in step two you're going to be thinking about how to achieve those benefits in terms of customer fuel savings and greenhouse gas emissions...

AI summary Mr. Bowman emphasizes that if the PAC test (peak avoidance cost) is prioritized in step three, step two should focus on hybrid heating solutions to avoid peak demand, rather than full electrification. He critiques E1's heat pump example for neglecting peak costs and stresses the need for early communication of peak-avoidance goals to guide program design, ensuring energy efficiency and electrification efforts align with utility cost management.

And Mr. Bowman concluded: p. pp. 7-8
And Mr. Bowman concluded: "So the PAC is signalling even more savings than the TRC, and I think in some cases it may signal even more savings than the BCA. But it will also help achieve more investment, for example, in the again, something...

AI summary Mr. Bowman highlights PAC's potential for greater savings and investment compared to TRC and BCA. Ms. Thompson acknowledges hybrid heating's value under E1's BCA framework. Eastward criticizes E1 for insufficient emphasis on hybrid heating's benefits, urging the Board to mandate its inclusion in future plans. Commissioner Murphy questions E1's Rebuttal on hybrid heating timelines.

AVERAGE VERSUS MARGINAL EMISSIONS RATES p. pp. 8-9
AVERAGE VERSUS MARGINAL EMISSIONS RATES On cross-examination Dr. Hill confirmed that the emissions rates that EFG used for the illustrative examples in the Application "were based on information from Nova Scotia Power and represented avera...

AI summary The document discusses the use of average versus marginal emissions rates in regulatory proceedings. EFG used average rates for illustrative examples, while E1 argued for marginal rates. Eastward emphasized that future generation sources (coal, fuel oil) justify marginal rates, contrasting with hybrid heating's high efficiency. Hybrid heating's impact on peak demand and electrification's upward pressure on peaks are noted.

NATURAL GAS TO ELECTRIC CONVERSIONS p. pp. 9-10
NATURAL GAS TO ELECTRIC CONVERSIONS In its Rebuttal Evidence E1 stated that: "In the actual event that conversion of gas heating systems to electric heat pumps results, under that application of the proposed BCA yielded a negative benefit...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) argues that converting natural gas heating systems to electric heat pumps would result in a negative benefit of $17.4 million and a benefit-cost ratio of 0.45, requiring justification under existing Board directives. Eastward challenges this, arguing such a measure should not be considered valid strategic electrification and urges the Board to provide guidance on the level of justification required for such a low benefit-cost ratio.

99642Closing Submission - ECEL 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended – and – IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand-side Managem...

AI summary East Coast Environmental Law submits a closing statement supporting EfficiencyOne's proposed new Benefit-Cost Analysis test for evaluating DSM plans, emphasizing the inclusion of avoided social costs of carbon and the Board's responsibility under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act to consider non-energy impacts in cost-effectiveness testing.

99643Closing Submission - NSPI 4 passages
EFFICIENCYONE'S PROPOSAL p. pp. 0-1
impact view become the dominant perspective. E1 determined that two legislative changes have significant implications to be recognized in the new BCA test that reflect Nova Scotia's policy objectives: - 1. On November 9, 2022, the Nova Sco...

AI summary EfficiencyOne highlights two legislative changes impacting Nova Scotia's BCA test: a 2022 PUA amendment shifting cost-effectiveness testing to the portfolio level and expanding DSM definitions, and the 2024 Energy Reform Act adding factors like energy efficiency, sustainable development, and GHG emissions to the Energy Board's considerations.

LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND ANALYSIS p. pp. 2-3
Implementation Date, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated shall undertake cost-effective demand-side management that is reasonably available in an effort to reduce costs for its customers. (emphasis added) It is the reduction of costs for custom...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSP) is mandated under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) to implement cost-effective demand-side management (DSM) to reduce customer electricity costs. DSM includes activities like energy conservation, demand pattern alteration, and strategic electrification. Though section 79A(b)(iv) was amended in 2022, the core objective of reducing electricity costs remains unchanged. Legal references include M08888 and 2020 NSUARB 56.

Climate change response and greenhouse gas emissions goals p. p. 7
Climate change response and greenhouse gas emissions goals (b) to support, strengthen, and set targets for energy efficiency programming while prioritizing equitable access and benefits for low income and marginalized Nova Scotians. While...

AI summary The text emphasizes supporting energy efficiency programs with equitable access for low-income and marginalized communities while reaffirming the statutory requirement for Demand Side Management (DSM) programming to remain cost-effective. It clarifies that these goals do not override existing cost-effectiveness mandates.

Avoided Cost Series p. p. 7
Avoided Cost Series NS Power submits that the current avoided cost series is primarily intended to inform analysis of traditional energy efficiency measures that reduce both energy and peak demand, or contribute to demand response. In the...

AI summary NS Power proposes updating the avoided cost series for DSM and Demand Response to reflect new programming, including strategic electrification. They emphasize the need for tailored cost curves and collaboration with E1 and DSMAG. The BCA test focuses on demand-side resources, not supply-side.

99644Closing Submission - CA 3 passages
6 a. The Legislative Context for this Application p. p. 2
6 a. The Legislative Context for this Application 8 This Application occurs in the context of recent legislative amendments, which have impacted 9 energy regulation in Nova Scotia. 11 Specifically, the Energy Reform Act (2024) , c 2, Bill...

AI summary The legislative context includes the Energy Reform Act (2024) and related statutes, establishing the Energy Board and emphasizing sustainable development, competition, and energy efficiency. Amendments to the PUA require evaluating demand-side management at the portfolio level, including strategic electrification.

13 vi. Eastward Energy p. p. 7
13 vi. Eastward Energy 14 15 Eastward Energy filed evidence by Posterity Group Consulting Inc. In this evidence, Posterity 16 Group requested "that E1 specifically recognize the benefits of hybrid heating to reduce peak load impacts as par...

AI summary Eastward Energy submitted evidence by Posterity Group Consulting Inc., urging EfficiencyOne (E1) to include hybrid heating benefits in the 2027-2031 DSM Plan. Posterity Group provided examples showing net benefits under the BCA test. Christopher Pulfer of Posterity Group testified as an expert witness.

Preamble p. pp. 9-11
Ibid at para 201; see also Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (Re) , 2018 NSUARB 154 at paras 87-91, affirmed in Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Nova Scotia (Utility and Review Board) , 2019 NSCA 66. - 2 (iv) strategic electrification of ene...

AI summary The text discusses the expansion of the Energy Board's consideration of environmental and societal impacts in assessing DSM cost-effectiveness, referencing past decisions and legislative amendments. It highlights the Board's interpretation of its statutory mandate to include factors like competition, innovation, and sustainable development.

99732Reply Submission - E1 1 passage
2.1 LEGISLATIVE INTERPRETATION & JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS p. p. 2
2.1 LEGISLATIVE INTERPRETATION & JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS The IG contends that the Board, under the Public Utilities Act (" PUA "), is not empowered to consider broad societal impacts or non-energy benefits when evaluating the cost-effectiven...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) argues that the Board under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) cannot consider societal impacts or non-energy benefits when evaluating demand-side management (DSM) cost-effectiveness, emphasizing ratepayer cost reduction. They claim the new strategic electrification provision in the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Act (ERBA) allows EfficiencyOne (E1) to expand programs but still requires adherence to cost-effectiveness, with sustainability limited to specific proposals.

99735Reply submission - NSPI 2 passages
Asset Value New equipment, latest technologies improve asset value p. pp. 1-2
Asset Value New equipment, latest technologies improve asset value Water cost impacts Some efficiency measures also reduce water consumption O&M Costs Energy Efficiency (EE) and Electric Vehicles (EV) typically decrease. Demand Response (D...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of energy efficiency (EE) measures and other programs on asset value, water consumption, operational costs, productivity, economic well-being, comfort, amenity, health and safety, empowerment, and pride. It also critiques the relevance of individual benefits to sustainability goals outlined in legislative amendments, emphasizing the need for empirical support to link these benefits to broader sustainability outcomes.

Preamble p. pp. 2-3
Even more concerning from NS Power's perspective is that the above list of NEBs is then assigned a proxy value and factored into the assessment of broader Host Customer Impacts as listed at Table 14 of Energy Futures Group (EFG)'s evidence...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised by NS Power regarding the use of proxy values in assessing Host Customer Impacts, particularly in the context of non-efficiency DERs. EFG recommends a generalized approach due to data limitations, while the SBA is reassured by E1's commitment to an evergreen process. NS Power argues that the Board should not approve the PCA without a fully developed and evidence-based framework.

100256Board Decision 6 passages
2.0 PROPOSED BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS TEST p. p. 5
s to address the limitations of the TRC test and enhance the rigour and relevance of DSM cost-effectiveness evaluation consistent with best practices and Nova Scotia-specific legislative requirements. [16] E1 submitted that the proposed BC...

AI summary E1 proposes replacing the TRC test with a Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) test for DSM programs, aligning with Nova Scotia's policy objectives and NSPM guidelines. The BCA test incorporates non-utility impacts like GHG reductions and societal benefits, contrasting with the TRC test's narrower focus. E1 emphasizes alignment with the Public Utilities Act and expanded Board evaluation criteria.

3.1 Consumer Advocate p. p. 14
3.1 Consumer Advocate [28] The Consumer Advocate is a signatory to the Consensus Agreement. The Consumer Advocate argues that recent amendments to the Public Utilities Act altered the criteria the Board is to apply in evaluating E1's propo...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate argues that recent amendments to the Public Utilities Act require evaluating demand-side management programs at the portfolio level, including strategic electrification. They emphasize incorporating sustainability factors in the BCA test, preferring E1's approach over the PAC test, and support a 2% social discount rate for long-term impacts. They also maintain the 10% proxy value for electrification and acknowledge the PAC test as a potential secondary measure.

4.1.3 Board Approval of Demand-side Management p. pp. 28-30
4.1.3 Board Approval of Demand-side Management [78] Before 2010, NS Power undertook its own demand-side management programs. In 2009, responding to growing concerns over the potential inherent conflict between selling electricity and takin...

AI summary Before 2010, NS Power managed its own demand-side programs. In 2009, the Legislature enacted the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act, creating a not-for-profit to administer demand-side management and energy efficiency programs, funded by utility assessments. The NSUARB approved expenditures from the fund, effective January 2010.

4.1.4 The 2020 Non-energy Benefits Decision p. p. 33
f customers and must be necessarily limited by the statutory definition of "electricity efficiency and conservation activities" outlined in Section 79A(b). - [38] The Board interprets the comments of the Minister of Energy cited by Efficie...

AI summary The NSUARB clarifies that the 2014 amendments to the Public Utilities Act mandate NS Power to implement cost-effective electricity efficiency programs, without establishing an environmental jurisdiction. The Board rejects an environmental mandate interpretation and aligns with the Industrial Group's view that Section 79A's scope is limited to cost reduction, not broader regulatory oversight.

(2) A franchise p. p. 40
(2) A franchise (a) gives the franchise holder the exclusive right to supply Nova Scotia Power Incorporated with reasonably available, cost-effective demand-side management for the purpose of this Act; … - 79K (1) Nova Scotia Power Incorpo...

AI summary The franchise grants exclusive rights to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) for cost-effective demand-side management. NSPI must share customer data with franchise holders and cooperate with the IESO on integrated resource planning. Provisions emphasize cost-effectiveness and 'reasonably available' demand-side management, with E1 arguing for a broader benefits-costs test beyond utility impacts.

4.6 Average v Marginal Generation Emissions p. pp. 71-73
4.6 Average v Marginal Generation Emissions [199] Eastward raised a concern about E1's proposal to calculate emissions impacts for the DSM portfolio by using average emissions rates in its modelling analysis. Eastward suggested marginal em...

AI summary Eastward raised a concern about using average emissions rates in E1's DSM portfolio modelling, suggesting marginal emissions rates should be used instead. This is due to future incremental generation expected to come from coal, heavy fuel oil, and natural gas or fuel oil combustion turbines, which operate at lower efficiencies. NS Power's data shows that coal-fired generation was on the margin more than 75% of the time from 2014 to 2024.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →