Topic:"Energy Management Information Systems" in M12623

First Pass – NYISO is provided 600 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 200 MW each, among the other three participants – including PJM. Second Pass – PJM is provided 200 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equall...

AI summary The document discusses the allocation of 600 MW of assistance among NYISO and PJM, with subsequent adjustments and the impact on generation and ACE (Area Control Error) following a contingency. The restoration of ACE and the resulting generation changes are detailed in a table.

First Pass – NYISO is provided 600 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 200 MW each, among the other three participants – including PJM. Second Pass – PJM is provided 200 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equall...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of generation assistance among Balancing Authorities, including NYISO and PJM, and the restoration of ACE (Area Control Error) after a contingency. It also references the SAR (Simultaneous Activation of Ten-Minute Reserve) procedure and the impact on generation levels.

First Pass – NYISO is provided 200 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 67 MW each, among the other three participants – including PJM. Second Pass – PJM is provided 600 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of generation assistance among Balancing Authorities, including NYISO and PJM, during a contingency event. It outlines the process of restoring the composite NPCC/PJM ACE and the impact on generation after the SAR procedure is canceled.

IESO IESO NE NE PJM PJM NY NY Tot Tot Time Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Sch ACE Pre-contingency 0 0 +1400 0 -700 0 -700 0 0 0 Contingency 0 0 +1400 -2100 -700 0 -700 0 0 -2100 PJM/NY/NE Schedule change 0 0 0 -700 0 -700 0 -700 0 -2100 N...

AI summary The table presents data related to scheduling changes, area control error (ACE), and simultaneous activation of ten-minute reserve (SAR) entries across different regions including IESO, NE, PJM, and NY. It outlines pre-contingency and contingency scenarios, schedule changes, and SAR responses.

First Pass – The NYISO is provided 600 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated equally, 200 MW each, among the other three participants – including PJM. Second Pass – PJM is provided -200 MW of assistance. These shares are allocated e...

AI summary The text discusses the allocation of assistance among Balancing Authorities, including the NYISO and PJM, and how negative shares reduce the net pick-ups required. It also references the restoration of the composite NPCC/PJM ACE and the cancellation of the SAR procedure, with an example involving ISO-NE purchasing power from multiple entities.

2.0 ADI Methodology Changes to the ADI states (enable/disable) and parameters are coordinated through the ADI Coordinator. The ADI Coordinator has the authority to globally disable ADI. Following this action, all participants shall be noti...

AI summary This section outlines the methodology for managing the ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) process, including the roles and responsibilities of the ADI Coordinator, participating Balancing Authorities, and the NPCC Working Group CO-1. It covers enabling/disabling ADI, communication protocols, data requirements, and reliability monitoring.

3.0 Action to Mitigate Ten-Minute Reserve Shortages 3.1 Actions When Becoming Deficient in Ten-Minute Reserve To minimize the magnitude and duration of a Ten-Minute Reserve deficiency, a Balancing Authority may implement any or all of the...

AI summary This section outlines actions a Balancing Authority can take to mitigate shortages in Ten-Minute Reserve, including committing off-line resources, recalling exports, obtaining external resources, recalling planned outages, and utilizing interruptible load or voltage reduction.

- 5.12.1 Each RAS Group and teleprotection of the RAS shall be on non-adjacent vertical mounting assemblies or enclosures, except as noted in 5.12.6. - 5.12.2 RAS Group LAN devices for redundant RAS Groups shall be on different non-adjacen...

AI summary The text outlines technical criteria for the installation and separation of RAS Groups and teleprotection systems to prevent common mode failures and ensure reliability. It specifies physical and environmental requirements for these systems, including cable separation, use of non-flammable barriers, and compliance with IEEE or IEC standards.

- its response to the conditions it is required to detect. - 2.2.2 For a RAS that is composed of multiple RAS Groups , the risk of simultaneous failure of more than one RAS Group because of design deficiencies or equipment failure should b...

AI summary The text outlines design and operational considerations for Remedial Action Schemes (RAS) to ensure dependability and security. It emphasizes the need to avoid simultaneous failures, use proven quality components, and minimize risks from external factors and electrical transients.