E-12027-2031 DSM Plan Application
17 passages
Considering the text, context and purpose of the legislation, the Board finds that the purpose of the demand-side management provisions in the Public Utilities Act is to reduce electricity costs for customers. This finding establishes the...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) interprets the Public Utilities Act's demand-side management (DSM) provisions as aimed at reducing customer electricity costs. E1's 2027–2031 DSM Plan aligns with this mandate. Legislative changes via the Energy Reform (2024) Act replaced the Utility and Review Board Act with the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act (ERBA), which mandates NSEB to prioritize competition, innovation, reliability, and sustainability in regulatory decisions.
2.1.4 PROVINCIAL CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY The statutory considerations outlined in ERBA's section 6(2), as well as the goals of DSM as set out in section 79A of PUA, establish the primary mandate for DSM. While the Province's climate and ener...
AI summary Nova Scotia's Provincial Climate Change Policy emphasizes demand-side management (DSM) under the Public Utilities Act (PUA) to reduce electricity costs while aligning with climate goals. The Clean Power Plan outlines transitioning to renewable energy, grid modernization, and affordability, guided by legislative acts like the Environmental Goals and Climate Change Reduction Act. The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) balances regulatory mandates with environmental objectives.
2.2.2 2025 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF NEW BCA TEST DECISION The following directives from the NSEB's 2025 Decision on E1's application for approval of a new BCA test are relevant to this Application: [13](#page-21-0) - (a) To use the Prog...
AI summary The NSEB outlines directives for E1's 2025 application to approve a new BCA test, requiring use of the PAC test with NS Power's WACC as the discount rate, strategic electrification programs to reduce GHG emissions and costs, inclusion of Eastward Energy in the DSM Advisory Group, and specific reporting requirements for DSM Plans.
2.2.2.1 COMPLIANCE WITH 2025 BCA DECISION - E1 has designed the 2027–2031 DSM Plan in accordance with the directives set out in the 2025 BCA Test - Decision. The specific compliance responses are summarized below. - First, E1 has used the...
AI summary E1 has designed the 2027–2031 DSM Plan in compliance with the 2025 BCA Test Decision, using the PAC test with NS Power's WACC, excluding initiatives failing to reduce both GHG and costs, and including future research on strategic electrification. E1 also provided required data to NSEB, noted NS Power's lack of long-run emissions data, and confirmed Eastward Energy's DSMAG participation.
3.2.1 THE ROLE OF THE IRP IN ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF DSM ENERGY SAVINGS One of the primary planning considerations for the development of the DSM Plan is NS Power's IRP. The IRP represents the most recent, comprehensive, and...
AI summary The IRP is central to the DSM Plan, providing a stakeholder-vetted assessment of optimal resource mix for Nova Scotia's electricity needs. NS Power's 2022 IRP incorporates updated policies like GHG targets and renewable goals, with DSM energy savings levels serving as a benchmark. Key themes include decarbonization, renewables, and electrification.
3.5 STRATEGIC ELECTRIFICATION Strategic electrification was added to E1's mandate by way of an update to section79A(b)(iv) of the PUA in 2022, as outlined in section [2.1.1](#page-8-3) above. The NSEB, in its decision on E1's BCA clarified...
AI summary Strategic electrification was added to E1's mandate via a 2022 PUA update. The NSEB requires strategic electrification to reduce both GHG emissions and electricity costs. E1 supports its inclusion in the 2027–2031 DSM Plan if it meets these criteria, though the Clean Power Plan lacks cost assumptions for guidance. The 2022 Evergreen IRP includes electrification scenarios but not optimal savings levels.
s near-term affordability with long-term value by constraining investment to 2026 levels, during a period of significant cost-of-living challenges for Nova Scotians; 6 transmission, and distribution; - 1 (c) provides equitable access to DS...
AI summary The Preferred Plan ensures near-term affordability and long-term value by limiting investments to 2026 levels, promoting equitable DSM benefits across customer classes, achieving energy savings below supply-side costs, and aligning with NS Power's IRP. It complies with ERBA and NSEB directives, supporting competition, innovation, and GHG emission reductions through energy efficiency and strategic electrification.
5
AI summary This document is from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, listing acronyms and entities relevant to energy regulation, including organizations like NS Power, programs such as DSM, and regulatory frameworks like the PUA and ERBA. It outlines key terms for energy efficiency, demand response, and utility cost recovery mechanisms.
- 1 (d) "Consequential Losses" means consequential, special, incidental, multiple, 2 exemplary or punitive damages including lost profits, whether such claim of lost 3 profits is categorized as indirect, direct or consequential damages or...
AI summary The text defines key legal terms in a contractual agreement, including 'Consequential Losses,' 'Contract Documents,' and 'Environmental Laws.' It references the 'EECA DSM Resource Plan' approved by NSEB and UARB, and outlines 'Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Demand-side Management Activities.' The definitions cover legal obligations, environmental compliance, and regulatory frameworks.
4 6. SAFETY - 5 6.1 EfficiencyOne shall at all times be responsible for safety and loss management in the 6 supply or performance of the EECADSM. - 7 6.2 EfficiencyOne shall ensure that all employees, Subcontractors, agents and 8 represent...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is mandated to ensure safety and loss management in the EECADSM and comply with all federal, provincial, and municipal health, safety, and environmental regulations. This includes enforcing compliance among employees, subcontractors, and representatives.
22 8. ENVIRONMENT - 23 8.1 EfficiencyOne and its Subcontractors shall at all times comply with all Environmental Laws 24 that apply in any way to the supply or performance of the EECADSM. EfficiencyOne and 25 its Subcontractors shall not c...
AI summary Section 8 mandates EfficiencyOne and its subcontractors to comply with environmental laws, prohibiting hazardous substance releases. EfficiencyOne must indemnify NSPI for any environmental law breaches or hazardous substance releases caused by its actions, covering all related costs and liabilities.
- 1 (d) " Consequential Losses " means consequential, special, incidental, multiple, 2 exemplary or punitive damages including lost profits, whether such claim of lost 3 profits is categorized as indirect, direct or consequential damages o...
AI summary The text defines key contractual and legal terms in a Nova Scotia regulatory agreement, including Consequential Losses, Contract Documents, DSM Resource Plan, Demand-side Management Activities, Environmental Laws, and Force Majeure Events. Terms reference EfficiencyOne, NSEB, and regulatory compliance frameworks.
6. SAFETY - 2 6.1 EfficiencyOne shall at all times be responsible for safety and loss management in the 3 supply or performance of the DSM. - 4 6.2 EfficiencyOne shall ensure that all employees, Subcontractors, agents and 5 representatives...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is mandated to manage safety and loss in Demand Side Management (DSM) and ensure compliance with federal, provincial, municipal, and internal health, safety, and environmental regulations.
8. ENVIRONMENT - 8.1 EfficiencyOne and its Subcontractors shall at all times comply with all Environmental Laws that apply in any way to the supply or performance of the DSM. EfficiencyOne and its Subcontractors shall not cause, permit or...
AI summary EfficiencyOne and its subcontractors must comply with environmental laws and avoid hazardous substance releases. EfficiencyOne is required to indemnify NSPI against costs arising from environmental law breaches or hazardous substance releases, including liabilities to NSPI's affiliates and stakeholders.
25 Schedule B (Page 1 of 2)
AI summary Schedule B (Page 1 of 2) from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document lists acronyms and terms related to energy regulation, utility operations, and demand-side management. Key entities include NS Power, NSEB, and ERBA, with topics covering energy efficiency, rate design, and regulatory frameworks.
4.2 DSM Resource Plan Research
AI summary Section 4.2 discusses research related to Demand Side Management (DSM) resource planning in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory bodies, programs, and analyses of energy efficiency, demand response, and cost recovery mechanisms.
4.3.2 Cost-Effectiveness Testing - 5 E1 will apply the Board-approved cost-effectiveness test at the portfolio level under the Public - Utilities Act . - 7 As directed under M12282, the PAC test is the primary screening test, using NS Powe...
AI summary E1 will apply the Board-approved cost-effectiveness test at the portfolio level under the Public Utilities Act, using the PAC test with NS Power's WACC as the discount rate. Strategic electrification must reduce GHG emissions and electricity costs. E1 will provide results at multiple levels and justify failed measures individually.
E-32025 DSM Evaluation Reports
23 passages
EfficiencyOne (E1), an independent, non-profit organization, is responsible for helping Nova Scotians improve the energy efficiency of their homes and workplaces by designing, marketing, and delivering demand-side management (DSM) for Nova...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1), a non-profit organization, delivers demand-side management (DSM) programs through the Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) franchise. E1's 2025 DSM program portfolio achieved significant energy and demand savings, including 129.444 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 60,748 tonnes of CO2 eq in avoided emissions. Econoler, along with other evaluators, conducted the evaluation of these programs.
7 Instant Savings Impact Evaluation The objectives of the 2025 Instant Savings impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as EUL values and associate...
AI summary The 2025 Instant Savings impact evaluation aimed to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annual avoided GHG emissions, and Effective Useful Life (EUL) values with associated lifetime energy savings.
Figure 9: 2025 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Gross Electrical Energy Savings Figure 10: 2025 Instant Savings Tracked and Evaluated Gross Peak Demand Savings As presented in [Table](#page-116-2) 19 below, GHG emission reductions wer...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of GHG emission reductions based on electricity production in Nova Scotia, using Instant Savings gross savings data from 2025 and applying a Nova Scotia-specific factor.
CONCLUSION [Table](#page-124-1) 25 presents the participation levels, NTGRs, evaluated gross and net savings at the generator, annual GHG emission reductions, as well as EUL values for each Residential Efficient Product Rebates program com...
AI summary Table 25 summarizes participation levels, net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs), evaluated savings, GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life (EUL) values for Nova Scotia's 2025 Residential Efficient Product Rebates program components and overall program performance.
Table 1: Summary of 2025 Existing Residential Program Evaluation Program Component Evaluation Type Impact Process Market Methodology AMH Condensed › Tracking sheet audit › Desk reviews › Effective useful life (EUL) update › Use of a net-to...
AI summary The document summarizes the evaluation of existing residential programs in 2025, including methods like tracking sheet audits, net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) calculations, and GHG emission reduction assessments for various components such as AMH, ASFH, EPI, Green Heat, HEA, and MHEEP. It also includes a comprehensive evaluation of residential behavior.
3 AMH Impact Evaluation The objectives of the 2025 AMH impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as the EUL and associated lifetime electrical energ...
AI summary The 2025 AMH Impact Evaluation aims to assess gross and net electrical energy savings, peak demand reductions, annual GHG emissions avoided, and the Effective Useful Life (EUL) of Affordable Multifamily Housing programs, along with their lifetime energy savings.
Table 12: 2025 ASFH Evaluation Approach Evaluation Objectives Research Questions Methodology Calculate gross results › Are the data in the tracking sheet complete, accurate, and consistent? › What are the evaluated first-year and lifetime...
AI summary Table 12 outlines the 2025 ASFH Evaluation Approach, detailing objectives, research questions, and methodologies for calculating both gross and net results, including tracking sheet audits and GHG emission reductions.
7 ASFH Impact Evaluation The objectives of the 2025 ASFH impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as the EUL values and associated lifetime electri...
AI summary The 2025 ASFH impact evaluation aims to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, and Effective Useful Life (EUL) values with associated lifetime energy savings for Affordable Single-family Homes.
Table 17: Evaluated 2025 ASFH Gross GHG Emission Reductions Total Gross Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) 6.135 Nova Scotia-specific GHG Emissions Factor for Electricity Production (tonnes of CO2 eq/GWh) 469.3 Gross Annual GHG Emissi...
AI summary Table 17 evaluates the 2025 gross GHG emission reductions from Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) programs. It shows energy savings, the Nova Scotia-specific GHG emissions factor, and the resulting annual GHG emission reductions.
GHG Emission Reduction Calculations To obtain net avoided GHG emissions in CO2 eq for EPI, the Evaluator multiplied net electrical energy savings by the latest Nova Scotia-specific factor for GHG emissions generated by electricity producti...
AI summary Net avoided GHG emissions for EPI are calculated by multiplying net electrical energy savings by a Nova Scotia-specific factor derived from NS Power's electricity production emissions data, reflecting regionally tailored GHG emission rates.
The detailed results per measure are presented in [Table](#page-17-0) 29 below. The net electrical energy savings resulted in 3,426 tonnes of CO2 eq in net annual GHG emission reductions. LED Lamps Net Lifetime Electrical Energy Savings –...
AI summary The text presents detailed results from a table showing energy savings from LED lamps, including net electrical energy savings and peak demand savings. The net electrical energy savings resulted in 3,426 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emission reductions.
12 EPI Key Findings and Recommendations As mentioned previously, the main objectives of the 2025 EPI evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net EPI results, namely first-year and lifetime electrical energy savings, peak demand s...
AI summary The 2025 EPI evaluation aimed to calculate gross and net results, including energy savings, peak demand reductions, and avoided GHG emissions. Key findings and recommendations address these objectives, focusing on the efficiency of product installation programs.
Net savings are defined as the energy use reductions specifically attributable to Green Heat. Net savings were estimated by applying the NTGRs listed above to the evaluated gross savings using the following equation. Net Savings = Gross Sa...
AI summary The document defines net savings as energy use reductions attributable to Green Heat, calculated using NTGRs applied to gross savings. The net electrical energy savings resulted in 352 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emission reductions.
16 Green Heat Key Findings and Recommendations As previously mentioned, the main objectives of the 2025 Green Heat evaluation were as follows: › Calculate gross and net results, namely first-year and lifetime electrical energy savings, pea...
AI summary The 2025 Green Heat program missed its energy savings targets, achieving only 21% and 44% of electrical energy and peak demand goals. Participation declined by 33% due to competition from the closed CGH Grant and reduced rebates. Gross and net savings matched E1's reported figures, indicating accurate tracking.
Note on Margin of Error For evaluation activities that yield quantitative results based on a sample, the Evaluator aimed to achieve a maximum margin of error of 10% at a confidence level of 90%. This means that, if measurements were conduc...
AI summary The Evaluator aimed for a 10% margin of error at 90% confidence in quantitative evaluations. 2025 data were unavailable, with 2024 Nova Scotia Power emissions (5,314,847 CO2 eq tonnes) and generation (11,326 GWh) sourced from Nova Scotia Power and Emera Inc. annual reports.
19 HEA Impact Evaluation The objectives of the 2025 HEA impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as weighted average EUL values and associated life...
AI summary The 2025 HEA impact evaluation aims to assess gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annual avoided GHG emissions, weighted average EUL values, and associated lifetime energy savings from Home Energy Assessments.
22 MHEEP Evaluation Approach The 2025 MHEEP evaluation comprised a condensed impact evaluation. The main objectives of the 2025 MHEEP evaluation were as follows: › Calculate MHEEP gross and net results, namely first-year and lifetime elect...
AI summary The 2025 MHEEP evaluation focused on calculating gross and net results, including first-year and lifetime electrical energy savings, peak demand savings, and avoided GHG emissions, through a condensed impact evaluation approach.
26 Residential Behaviour Evaluation Approach The 2025 Residential Behaviour evaluation consisted of an impact evaluation using a billing analysis for the months in 2025 for which AMI data were available (i.e. January to April 2025). The pr...
AI summary The 2025 Residential Behaviour evaluation aimed to calculate electrical first-year energy savings and avoided GHG emissions using a billing analysis of AMI data from January to April 2025. The process evaluation was postponed due to the timing of report delivery.
The Residential Behaviour net electrical energy savings were estimated using the following equation: Net Savings = ∑ Monthly Savings – Savings Deductions for Participation in Other Programs The detailed results are listed in [Table](#page-...
AI summary The Residential Behaviour program's net electrical energy savings were calculated using a specific equation, resulting in 2,607 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emission reductions. The calculation used a Nova Scotia-specific factor for electricity production-related GHG emissions.
DEFINITIONS Accuracy Reflects the proximity of measurements to the true value. Equivalent CO2 A unit of measurement indicating the amount of carbon dioxide to which various kinds of emitted greenhouse gases are equivalent in terms of warmi...
AI summary The document provides definitions related to energy efficiency and environmental impact, including terms like 'Accuracy,' 'Equivalent CO2,' and 'Equivalent effective useful life.' These definitions help quantify and assess energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions.
Program Performance Table 2 below presents participation levels, NTGRs, evaluated gross and net savings at the generator, annual GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life (EUL) values for each service as well as for BER overall.
AI summary Table 2 provides data on participation levels, net-to-gross ratios (NTGRs), evaluated gross and net savings, annual GHG emission reductions, and effective useful life (EUL) values for each service and for BER overall.
6 Building Optimization Impact Evaluation The objectives of the 2025 Building Optimization impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as EUL values a...
AI summary The 2025 Building Optimization Impact Evaluation assessed energy savings, peak demand reductions, GHG emissions avoidance, and EUL values. It identified three savings categories, with nine single-year projects achieving final savings in 2025. No multiyear projects or partial savings claims were reported.
Table 29: Evaluated 2025 Building Optimization Gross GHG Emission Reductions Total Gross Electrical Energy Savings – at the Generator (GWh) 0.609 Nova Scotia-specific GHG Emissions Factor for Electricity Production (tonnes of CO2 eq/GWh) 4...
AI summary Table 29 evaluates the 2025 Building Optimization Gross GHG Emission Reductions, showing 0.609 GWh of electrical energy savings, a GHG emissions factor of 469.3 tonnes of CO2 eq/GWh, and a total of 286 tonnes of CO2 eq in annual GHG emission reductions.
E-16E1 (Synapse) RIRs 1-90
6 passages
Round 2 Model Input Assumptions and Results Board Directives E1 Update primary screening cost-effectiveness test when inconsistent with the PAC test the Board has directed E1 to apply): a. If E1 uses a social discount rate, it must also pr...
AI summary The document outlines the Board's directives for the Round 2 model input assumptions and results, including the use of social discount rates and WACC, and the inclusion of emissions impacts in the analysis. E1 has calculated emissions impacts but is awaiting long-run marginal emissions rates from NS Power, which are not currently available.
Environmental Legislation and Climate Change NSPI is subject to environmental laws and regulations as set by both the Government of Canada and the Nova Scotia Provincial Government (the "Province"). NSPI continues to work with both levels...
AI summary NSPI is subject to environmental laws and regulations from both the Canadian and Nova Scotia governments. NSPI aims to comply with these regulations while minimizing customer costs and anticipates that prudently incurred compliance costs will be recoverable. Risks related to non-compliance with climate-related legislation could affect NSPI's operations and financial performance.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS"): PFAS are man-made chemicals that are widely used in consumer products and can persist and bioaccumulate in the environment. The Company does not manufacture PFAS but because these contaminants...
AI summary PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist in the environment and may impact NSPI's operations due to potential regulatory changes. These changes could lead to new costs, obligations, and shifts in land acquisition strategies, potentially causing a Material Adverse Effect.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: NSPI is subject to GHG emission caps for the 2010 through 2030 period as outlined in the "Nova Scotia Greenhouse Gas Regulations", and further updated by Order in Council in 2013. The emission cap reduces from 10...
AI summary NSPI is subject to provincial GHG emission caps under the Nova Scotia Greenhouse Gas Regulations, which decrease from 10 to 4.5 megatonnes between 2010 and 2030. The province has an equivalency agreement with the federal government, exempting it from federal GHG regulations. NSPI is also required to participate in the OBPS and aligns with federal goals, including the Clean Electricity Regulations, to achieve a net-zero electricity grid by 2035.
NSPI received a Certificate of Variance from NSECC on March 25, 2025, which provides flexibility on the timing of SO2 emissions over the 2025 through 2034 period, including compensating for the excess 14,410 tonnes of SO2 emissions in 2022...
AI summary NSPI received a Certificate of Variance from NSECC in 2025, allowing flexibility in SO2 emissions compliance. Environmental regulations and policies may lead to increased costs, delays in infrastructure projects, and potential stranded assets. Non-compliance risks penalties and legal actions, which could have a Material Adverse Effect.
The forward-looking information is based on reasonable assumptions and is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or results anticipated by the forward-...
AI summary The forward-looking information provided is based on reasonable assumptions and is subject to various risks and uncertainties that may affect actual results, including regulatory, economic, operational, and environmental factors, as well as changes in technology, customer behavior, and global conditions.