Topic:"Evidence Requirements" in M12550

Matter: To obtain a cost reasonableness review of NS Power - CI C0051815 – $5,959,515 - RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, as outlined in Section 2.1 of the ACE 2025 decision (M12012)

1 passage 1 document

Evidence Requirements across all matters →

101737Submission - CA 1 passage

Submissions p. p. 5

page-5-0) Accordingly, Midgard stated that the "technical comparison between Phase 1 and Phase 6 scope, complexity, or execution methods cannot be supported by primary documentation."[18](#page-5-2) In an Information Request filed by the C...

AI summary Midgard's report on the labour hours escalation between Phase 1 and Phase 6 lacks a technical comparison with other phases due to insufficient data. The Consumer Advocate argues that historical documentation from Phase 1 and other phases could have provided necessary context and filled an evidentiary gap.

Open document →

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →