Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Evidence Requirements" in M12733

Matter: NSPI DRO Appeal - Billing Issues - Dave Lincoln
9 passages 5 documents

Evidence Requirements across all matters →

L-2Electricity and Gas Inspection Act Regulations 5 passages
Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve p. p. 0
Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur support papier ou sur support électroniqu...

AI summary Published codified laws and regulations are deemed evidence of their content under Nova Scotia law. Original legislative provisions with subsequent parliamentary amendments take precedence over conflicting codified versions published by the minister.

Burden of proof Charge de la preuve p. p. 27
Burden of proof Charge de la preuve 29.21 En cas de contestation des faits, la décision du ministre repose sur la prépondérance des probabilités. 2011, ch. 3, art. 6. 29.22 En cas de commission d'une violation par toute personne autre qu'u...

AI summary The text outlines legal provisions regarding the burden of proof and liability for violations. Section 29.21 states that the minister's decisions rely on the balance of probabilities when facts are contested. Section 29.22 holds directors, administrators, or mandataries of non-individual entities liable as co-authors of violations if they authorized, participated in, or consented to the violation.

Evidence Admissibilité du procès-verbal de violation p. p. 28
Evidence Admissibilité du procès-verbal de violation 29.25 Dans les procédures en violation, le procès-verbal paraissant délivré en application de la présente loi est admissible en preuve sans qu'il soit nécessaire de prouver l'authenticit...

AI summary The text outlines procedures for admissibility of evidence in violation proceedings under Nova Scotia law. It states that minutes from violations are admissible without proving signature authenticity or official status of signatories. The statute of limitations for such proceedings is six months from when an inspector became aware of the alleged violation. Documents from the minister confirming notification dates are also admissible without signature verification.

Certificates of inspectors Certificats des inspecteurs p. p. 35
Certificates of inspectors Certificats des inspecteurs 37 (1) Dans les poursuites pour infraction à la présente loi et dans toute autre procédure relevant de l'autorité législative du Parlement, les certificats présentés comme délivrés par...

AI summary Section 37(1) establishes that certificates issued by inspectors under this law are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings without requiring verification of the signature's authenticity or the inspector's official status. This provision reinforces the legal weight of inspector certifications in regulatory and judicial contexts.

Evidence of registration certificate Authentification du certificat d'enregistrement p. p. 35
Evidence of registration certificate Authentification du certificat d'enregistrement 38 (1) Sous réserve du paragraphe (2), dans les poursuites pour infraction aux paragraphes 6(2) ou (3), tout document présenté comme un certificat d'enreg...

AI summary This legal provision outlines the admissibility of documents as registration certificates in proceedings under sections 6(2) or (3), requiring proof to the contrary and prior notice with document copies. It references the Revised Statutes of Canada, chapter 87, article 37.

L-8Appellants Response to NSPI (redacted) 1 passage
7. Documentation Gaps Confirm Evasion p. p. 4
7. Documentation Gaps Confirm Evasion - Pre-Jan 2020 invoices "not available" (2017 account open) - No prior-owner aggregate usage baseline ( privacy excuse invalid ) - Incomplete ledger/meter history, duplicates unresolved

AI summary The section highlights documentation gaps, including missing pre-2020 invoices, lack of prior-owner usage data (with an invalid privacy excuse), and unresolved duplicates, suggesting evasion of regulatory requirements.

L-9LINCOLN (NSEB) RIR-1 (redacted) 1 passage
\ \ EXTERNAL EMAIL / COURRIEL EXTERNE \ \ p. p. 7
re half-year period was only $782.82 for 6 full months, yet i was charged $803 per month for those same 6 months totalling $4818. Thats an incredible theft from anyone let alone a disabled Veteran. This completely exposes their data manipu...

AI summary A disabled veteran alleges Nova Scotia Power (NSP) overcharged them by $4,530.81 using unverified data and unauthorized 'ghost agreements,' claiming the billing system was manipulated to create artificial arrears. The complainant demands a forensic audit, restitution, and correction of fraudulent filings submitted to the Board.

101735Appellants Response to Board Letter (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
From: dlinc08 Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2026 1:52 AM To: Smith, Chase Cc: [email protected] ; Wallace, Lisa ; Chris Lanteigne ; Blake Williams ; Carley Freeman ; Forsey, Lisa ; Jennifer Ross ; Kathleen Murray ; Ross, Jennifer ; Sofi...

AI summary The sender notifies the Ombudsman of a breach in Matter M12733, alleging NS Power and the Board failed to produce signed Regulation 6.5(3) agreements, which the sender claims do not exist since 2017. This highlights a regulatory compliance and evidentiary record issue.

102174Appellant Correspondence d. May 26, 2026 (redacted) 1 passage
Section 1
From: dlinc08 > Sent: May 26, 2026 11:04 PM To: Penney, Nicole ; Premier ; Wallace, Lisa ; [email protected]; Minister of Energy ; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Blake WIlliams ; Carley...

AI summary The sender submits a forensic evidence update to Exhibit L-9, including correspondence between their office and the Canadian Prime Minister's Office, as part of Matter M12733. The email addresses Ms. Wallace, Premier Houston, and Board Staff, requesting caution with attachments.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →