Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Evidence Requirements" in M13074

Matter: NSPI DRO Appeal - Billing Issues - Joanna Hammersley
1 passage 1 document

Evidence Requirements across all matters →

H-2Appellants Evidence (redacted) 1 passage
8. The board should require the evidence — not guess at it
8. The board should require the evidence — not guess at it The Board does not need to conduct a general audit of NSP. It needs to decide a much narrower question: Did the DRO establish, with evidence from NSP, that the additional costs cla...

AI summary The Board is advised not to conduct a general audit of NSP but instead focus on whether the DRO provided sufficient evidence from NSP that the additional costs for Work Order #6873680 were incurred and properly attributable to the Project. The Board should ensure that records exist, and if not, NSP should explain the situation.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →