N-4IESO (DGT) RIR 1 to 23
4 passages
Response IR – 10 (a) The budgeting methodology for employees (administration) relied on peer reviews and the use of market information for each of the 23 positions. The administrative positions were aligned with peer organizations with sim...
AI summary The IESO Nova Scotia's budgeting methodology for administrative roles uses peer reviews and market data from organizations like NS Power and NB Power. Compensation targets the 50th percentile in Atlantic Canada, relying on recruitment site analyses and third-party market data from HUB International and KBRS for senior and administrative roles.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 40 by the Board of approximately $200,000 for a full regulatory proceeding, including 41 payments for intervening parties to participate in such proceedings. 42 43 Note, IESO Nova Scotia does not yet have an exact breakdow...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia explains that a $200,000 budget allocation covers regulatory proceedings, including intervenor payments. Exact 2025/2026 cost breakdowns are unavailable due to submitting the 2026/2027 Revenue Requirement Application before the 2025/2026 hearing process. The NSEB had not assessed expenses because IESO's initial application was unapproved (per the More Access to Energy Act). Legal/compliance subcategory estimates used 2025/2026 actual costs.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 20 (a) IESO Nova Scotia used an Activity Based methodology for procurement costs. Scopes 21 typically associated with electricity procurements were identified and costed based on the 22 estimated use of the listed external...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia explains its use of an Activity-Based methodology for procurement costs, detailing budget allocations for legal, technical, and project management support across initiatives like the Capacity Contract, 300 MW RFP, and Additional Capacity Procurement. The response addresses DGT's information requests, citing contingency reserves and cost breakdowns.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL (a) The budgeting methodology used for the Operations (system planning) category cost assumed 21 roles were being transferred from NS Power and, because employees transferred from NS Power must be compensated at least the...
AI summary The document outlines budgeting methodologies for Operations (system planning) costs, including compensation alignment with NS Power, salary adjustments for technical staff, and FTE changes between 2025/2026 and 2026/2027. Adjustments include excluding a 3% annual increase and adding a $300k benefit adjustment. Third-party recovery costs were doubled due to original budgeting for half a year.
N-11Evidence of Doane Grant Thornton
3 passages
7 3.2 Procedures - 8 Our procedures with respect to IESO Nova Scotia's revenue requirement calculations were focused on the - 9 assessment of the accuracy and reasonableness of the calculation, the reasonableness of the underlying - 10 ass...
AI summary The NSEB evaluated IESO Nova Scotia's revenue requirement calculations for mathematical accuracy, reviewed forecast methodologies, and assessed internal consistency in M12412 as of March 26, 2026. Focus was on verifying assumptions and ensuring alignment within the application.
4.2 Procedures - Our procedures with respect to OM&A costs included the following: - Summarized expenses by category above including 2025/2026 budget, 2025/2026 annualized budgeted expenditures, and 2026/2027 proposed budget. - Performed a...
AI summary The procedures detail analysis of OM&A costs, including budget comparisons, trend analysis, and review of IESO Nova Scotia's budgeting methodologies. Variances were investigated through requests for explanations and reasonableness assessments. Actual 2025/2026 expenses were compared to the budget approved in M12412.
est salary in that band was applied to the number of - 5 roles in that band/level. This approach was taken to ensure the ability to secure the skill sets and experience - sought.[13](#page-16-0) 6 21 - 7 In the Application, IESO Nova Scoti...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia outlines staffing and compensation assumptions for 2025/2026 and 2026/2027, including 23 roles with 15% fringe benefits covering insurance, pensions, and professional development. Nine of 23 positions are filled, with vacancies expected to be addressed by March/April 2026. A $4.34M compensation breakdown is referenced, assuming full staffing for budgeting purposes.
100958DGT (IESO NS) IR 1 to 23 - PDF
3 passages
Request IR-10: - Reference: Exhibit B-2 (page 14, lines 11-16, Employees administration) - IESO Nova Scotia states that " The 2026/2027 fiscal year assumes 23 administration employees - actively employed for the entire fiscal year- from Ap...
AI summary Request IR-10 seeks details on IESO Nova Scotia's budgeting for administration employees, including methodology, compensation increases, and staffing levels. The 2026/2027 budget includes additional IT and compliance roles to meet cybersecurity and regulatory standards.
Request IR-16: - Reference: Exhibit B-2 (page 28, lines 11-13, Finance) - IESO Nova Scotia states that "The greatest change in the Finance cost category between - 2025/2026 budget and the 2026/2027 budget is the interest costs. There is a...
AI summary Request IR-16 seeks clarification from IESO Nova Scotia on finance cost budgeting methodology, interest cost drivers, and subcategory increases (payroll/accounting subscription services). The 2026/2027 budget shows significant jumps (306% vs. 2025/2026) attributed to financing costs from the Province's operating line of credit. Questions also address temporary financial reliance impacts and payroll/service cost increases.
Request IR-17: - Reference: Exhibit B-2 (page 31, lines 8-18, Operations) - IESO Nova Scotia states that "The difference between the estimated annualized expenditures - under the 2025/2026 test year and the proposed 2026/2027 budget are ba...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia explains discrepancies between 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 budgets due to changes in full-time employees (FTEs), compensation increases, and burden assumptions. The request seeks clarification on budgeting methodology and cost breakdowns for specific operational categories.
20260617-1Hearing Transcript — 06/17/2026 (Johnny Johnston, Chris Milligan, Mike McFeters)
4 passages
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS Q. I guess what would you say to the concern that, you know, the Board approves X-dollars to be spent in a certain category, based on a forecast or an estimate that IESO Nova Scotia pr...
AI summary The concern is raised that the Board may approve funds for specific categories based on forecasts that may be inaccurate, allowing shortfalls in one area to be covered by underspends in another. The response acknowledges the concern and emphasizes the need for accurate forecasting and managing overall operational costs.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 121 Cr-ex, (Murphy) INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS accurate in your forecasts? [11:29:59] MR. JOHNSTON: You absolutely should expect us to be accurate in our forecasts. And I think what we're...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the accuracy of forecasts provided in the Application, with Mr. Johnston acknowledging that while initial forecasts were based on best guesses, future forecasts will improve with operational experience and increased diligence in obtaining third-party cost information.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 125 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 from living in a different jurisdiction that does things a 2 little differently, but my understanding of the regulatory 3 compact is that the Board approves the revenue requirement 4 based on a...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the regulatory process for approving revenue requirements, emphasizing that decisions should be based on forecasts made at the time they were submitted, rather than real-time updates. The speaker argues that requesting new forecasts during hearings could lead to procedural issues and challenges related to new evidence.
IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 129 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 forecast, and so they focus on one item that they believe 2 they can demonstrate that, and then everything else goes 3 to the wayside. And that results in a misleading picture 4 for the Board. A...
AI summary The discussion centers on the challenges of forecasting and the importance of focusing on the reasonableness of forecasts at the time they were made, rather than requiring updates on specific items. Concerns are raised about the potential for misleading the Board if forecasts are revised based on current conditions rather than original assumptions.