Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Fuel Cost Adjustment" in M07544

Matter: E-ENS-R-16 - EfficiencyOne - Incentive Setting Methodology Review and RecommendationsGroup with M06733
5 passages 4 documents

Fuel Cost Adjustment across all matters →

E-1Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan 1 passage
Avoided Supply Cost (Benefits) p. p. 112
Avoided Supply Cost (Benefits) Given the differences between Union Gas' and Enbridge's geography, system and customers and such, it is expected the avoided supply cost will be different between the two gas utilities. Under the TRC-plus tes...

AI summary The text explains that avoided supply costs will differ between Union Gas and Enbridge due to their distinct geographic, system, and customer factors. Under the TRC-plus test, benefits include avoided natural gas costs, transmission/distribution costs, and a 15% non-energy benefit adder for environmental, economic, and social advantages.

E-3REVISED Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan - Clean Version 1 passage
Benchmarking p. p. 36
Benchmarking If an incentive or technology is new, there may not be any historical data to assist with forecasting price and penetration curves in a utility's local market. Benchmarking incentive rates against similar technologies or progr...

AI summary Benchmarking incentive rates against similar technologies in other jurisdictions can address data gaps when local market data is unavailable. However, differences in currency, regulations, infrastructure, and demographics complicate comparisons. Direct benchmarking or adjustments for disparities are suggested, though adjustments are not precise. Engaging with other jurisdictions is recommended to understand market nuances.

69772Incentive Setting Methodology and CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan - Second Revision - Clean Version 1 passage
Benchmarking p. p. 35
Benchmarking If an incentive or technology is new, there may not be any historical data to assist with forecasting price and penetration curves in a utility's local market. Benchmarking incentive rates against similar technologies or progr...

AI summary Benchmarking against other jurisdictions is proposed when local data is unavailable, though challenges exist due to differences in currency, regulations, and infrastructure. Two approaches are outlined: direct benchmarking using comparable jurisdictions and adjustments for differences, though adjustments are imprecise. Engaging with other regions is emphasized to understand market nuances.

69773Incentive Setting Methodology and CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan - Second Revision - Redline Version 2 passages
Benchmarking p. p. 32
Benchmarking If an incentive or technology is new, there may not be any historical data to assist with forecasting price and penetration curves in a utility's local market. Benchmarking incentive rates against similar technologies or progr...

AI summary Benchmarking is proposed as a method to forecast prices and penetration curves for new incentives or technologies when local data is unavailable. It involves comparing with similar jurisdictions, adjusting for factors like currency exchange rates, and engaging in dialogue with other regions to understand market nuances. Direct benchmarking and adjustments are discussed as approaches, though adjustments are noted to be imprecise.

Northwest Power Plan 11 p. p. 159
Northwest Power Plan 11 The Northwest Power & Conservation Council represents the regional power planning efforts of Idaho, Washington, Oregon and Montana. The Northwest Power Act requires that the Council produce a 20-year Power Plan each...

AI summary The Northwest Power & Conservation Council develops a 20-year Power Plan every five years, emphasizing energy efficiency as the least-cost resource. The 2016 Plan highlights energy efficiency's role in avoiding fuel price volatility, financial risks, and carbon reduction policy impacts, while meeting future capacity needs. The Council prioritizes cost-effective energy efficiency for ratepayers over other resource options.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →