Topic:"Fuel Cost Adjustment" in M12784

6.6 Administrative Penalty [51] The Consumer Advocate stated that this is the ninth consecutive year in which NS Power has failed to meet one or more of its performance targets, and that the imposition of an administrative penalty could be...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate highlights NS Power's repeated failure to meet performance targets, suggesting an administrative penalty may be appropriate. The Industrial Group supports a penalty but recommends it be credited to customers via the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism. NS Power argues that improvements in performance, aside from those affected by a cyber event, make a penalty unnecessary.

6.6 Administrative Penalty [51] The Consumer Advocate stated that this is the ninth consecutive year in which NS Power has failed to meet one or more of its performance targets, and that the imposition of an administrative penalty could be...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate notes NS Power's ninth consecutive year of failing performance targets but acknowledges improvements in 2025. The Industrial Group supports imposing an administrative penalty through the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism to promote compliance. NS Power argues that improvements in performance, except for those impacted by a 2025 cyber event, make a penalty unnecessary.