Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Fuel Cost Adjustment" in M13007

Matter: Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator (IESO Nova Scotia) - Fee Recovery Mechanism Application
8 passages 7 documents

Fuel Cost Adjustment across all matters →

N-1Fee Recovery Mechanism Application 1 passage
Preamble p. p. 18
Because this is not a volumetric charge, recovery to the IESO will not vary with usage. However, the share of any market participant's usage (compared to other market participants) may vary from forecast, which would have the effect of var...

AI summary The text discusses a volumetric charge and its implications for cost recovery to the IESO, noting that while the charge itself is fixed, variations in a market participant's usage relative to others could affect cost allocation.

N-4IESO (IG) RIR 1 to 11 1 passage
Option 1: Energy Allocator p. p. 28
Option 1: Energy Allocator Options Summ ary ¢/kWh To l B i l l ta $ $ 2 1 2 0. 4 7, 7 2 4 9 2. 0 1 7, 1. 4 % Be low he L ine t 1 0. 1 8 4 0. 0 9 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 2 2 0. 0 1 2 0. 1 8 9 La In du tr ia l rg e s To ta l ( Av ) era g e 9 0. 1 8 9...

AI summary The document presents a detailed breakdown of energy charges and billing calculations under the Domestic Service Tariff (Standard Offer) for 2026 and 2027. It includes customer charges, base fuel costs, non-fuel costs, and various adjustment mechanisms like DSM PCR and FAM BA. The data shows a slight decrease in base fuel costs and an increase in non-fuel costs.

N-5IESO (LEI) RIR 1 to 10 1 passage
Terms of Settlement p. p. 31
Terms of Settlement IESO Fee Recovery Settlement Terms fe t he ha is in t ice e re co ve ry m ec n m p ra c o n an S O S fu l ba is ia te I E N t he an nu a s as a p p ro p r r r fe to in t he ha is ag re es re ex am e e re co ve ry m ec n...

AI summary The document outlines the terms of settlement related to IESO fee recovery, including the allocation of fees, responsibilities, and agreements between the IESO, NSP, and other entities. It discusses the mechanisms for fee recovery and the roles of various parties in the process.

N-7IESO (NSEB) RIR 1 to 22 1 passage
Response IR - 20 p. p. 33
Response IR - 20 - Given the OATT option noted by the NSEB was not selected as the proposed fee recovery option, details associated with it were not further developed and cannot be described with certainty. That - said, IESO Nova Scotia wo...

AI summary IESO Nova Scotia explains that the OATT fee recovery mechanism was not selected, so details are not fully developed. It clarifies that under OATT, fees would apply to all market participants, not just NS Power, and NS Power would pass on these fees accordingly.

N-9IESO (IG) RIR 1 Attachments 1 - REFILED 2 passages
- Does not consider cost causality
2.50 Energy Charges $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 4,9872.50 Energy Charges $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782.06 $ 2,823,782....

AI summary The text presents a detailed breakdown of energy charges and associated costs for various customer categories, including small general, large general, industrial, and extra large industrial customers. The data includes demand charges, energy charges, and illustrative IESO fees, with percentages indicating changes or variations in costs.

Option 5: SLF for Gen , Demand for Tx
Option 5: SLF for Gen , Demand for Tx Options Summary ¢/kWh DSM PCR ¢/kWh 0.657 0.657 0.000 0.0% 887 kWh 5.83 5.83 5.83 DSM BA ¢/kWh -0.024 -0.024 0.000 0.0% kWh - 0.21 - 0.21 - 0.21 Subtotal 0.633 0.633 0.000 0.0% 5.62 5.62 5.62 SCRR ¢/kW...

AI summary The document outlines a detailed cost breakdown for Option 5, including DSM PCR, SCRR, IESO RR, and fuel and non-fuel related costs, with percentages and kilowatt-hour values. It also includes customer charges and energy charges for the Small General Tariff (Standard Offer).

N-11Evidence - John Wilson on behalf of CA 1 passage
A. Per-MW Allocation Should Not Be Used p. p. 6
A. Per-MW Allocation Should Not Be Used - Q: Do you agree with IESO NS and FTI that a demand-based, or per-MW allocation, should not be used? - A: Yes. FTI provides sound reasons against (a) allocating the charge on a per-MW basis and (b)...

AI summary The response agrees with IESO NS and FTI that a per-MW allocation should not be used due to revenue variability and equity concerns. The OATT mechanism is criticized for potential over- or under-recovery of costs, especially in Nova Scotia’s smaller system with less load diversity. Alternative recovery methods, such as direct LSE invoicing, are suggested.

N-11-(i)CV - John D. Wilson 1 passage
EXPERT TESTIMONY
lity-installed chargers advance California goal for electric vehicles. Budget controls. Reporting requirements. Evaluation, monitoring and verification processes. Outreach to small business customers. California PUC Docket A.19-08-013, dir...

AI summary The text outlines various regulatory proceedings and expert testimonies across multiple jurisdictions, including California PUC, Georgia PSC, and Nova Scotia UARB, focusing on topics such as rate cases, fuel adjustment mechanisms, avoided cost reviews, and reliability measures for electric service.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →