EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary EfficiencyOne submits an incentive setting methodology filing to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB/NSUARB), outlining its approach for energy efficiency programs. The DSM Advisory Group (DSMAG) may be involved as an advisory body in the regulatory process.
EXISTING INCENTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The existing incentive development process should be followed for all existing incentives. While it does not necessarily need to be step-wise, all four steps should be covered in the analysis. It woul...
AI summary The existing incentive development process must be followed for all incentives, requiring completion of all four steps, with step (4) dependent on prior steps. A figure illustrating the process is referenced.
NEW INCENTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The new incentive development process should be followed for all new incentives. While it does not necessarily need to be step-wise, all five steps should be covered in the analysis. It would be difficult...
AI summary The new incentive development process requires all five steps to be followed for any new incentives, with step 5 dependent on completing steps 1-3. The process is illustrated in Figure 12.
ONTARIO (IESO) –OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of the Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) regulatory proceeding, involving key entities like the Ontario Energy Board (OEB), Ontario Power Authority (OPA), and Local Distribution Companies (LDCs). Focus areas include Demand Side Management (DSM) and Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (EERS).
ONTARIO - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING
AI summary The document outlines Ontario's energy efficiency programming initiatives, involving key stakeholders and regulatory bodies. It references programs, methodologies, and organizations involved in demand-side management and energy efficiency standards.
Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) What is a MAD: It is the decision of record determining measure cost effectiveness and authorizing use of a measure. The measure is clearly defined along with the conditions under which it is approved. Th...
AI summary The Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) is a regulatory decision defining energy efficiency measures, their cost-effectiveness, and approval conditions. It includes sections on validity, program scope, cost calculations, incentives, and technical details. Energy Trust engineering staff approve MADs after analysis by delivery contractors.
APPENDIX A-6: NEW YORK (CONSOLIDATED EDISON)
AI summary Appendix A-6 discusses New York's Consolidated Edison, referencing energy efficiency programs, regulatory bodies, and related acronyms. It includes entities like NYSERDA, ACEEE, and DSM, highlighting topics such as demand-side management and energy efficiency standards.
KEY PLAYERS
AI summary The document outlines key players in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including organizations, programs, and legislation related to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and utility regulation. Entities listed include regulatory bodies, industry groups, and energy programs.
Natural Gas Utilities regulated by NYSPSC 5 : - Bath Electric, Gas & Water System - Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation - Chautauqua Utilities, Inc. - Consolidated Edison Company of N Y, Inc. - Corning Natural Gas Corporation - Empir...
AI summary The document lists natural gas utilities regulated by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC), including companies such as Consolidated Edison, Rochester Gas & Electric, and National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation. These entities operate across New York and are subject to regulatory oversight.
APPENDIX A-8: VERMONT (EFFICIENCY VERMONT)
AI summary This appendix references Vermont's Efficiency Vermont program, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives. It includes context about regulatory bodies, programs, and acronyms relevant to energy efficiency and utility regulation in various jurisdictions.
EFFICIENCY VERMONT –OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of Efficiency Vermont, a program managed by the Vermont Public Services Board (PSB), focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and related regulatory proceedings.
NATIONAL GRID - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING
AI summary This document outlines a regulatory proceeding involving National Grid's Energy Efficiency Programming in Nova Scotia. Key focus areas include demand-side management, energy efficiency standards, and regulatory oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB). The proceeding examines programs, technologies, and methodologies for improving energy efficiency.
Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan FILED June 30, 2016 REVISED March 31, 2017
AI summary A 2016 regulatory proceeding document (revised 2017) outlines Nova Scotia's incentive-setting methodology using the CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan. It focuses on energy efficiency programs and regulatory processes related to utility incentives.
FORMAL & DOCUMENTED INCENTIVE SETTING PROCESS It is recommended that ENS use a formal and documented incentive setting process for all incentive setting exercises. This does not necessarily mean that every step of the process needs to be f...
AI summary The document recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) adopt a formal, documented incentive-setting process for all exercises, with three potential processes outlined. It emphasizes the importance of considering existing market incentives in customer and technology research, as well as financial impact analysis, though flow charts do not explicitly address this.
ONTARIO (IESO) –OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of Ontario's IESO regulatory proceeding, involving entities like ENS, OEB, and LDCs, focusing on energy efficiency programs and regulatory frameworks. Key acronyms and organizations related to demand-side management and electricity system operations are listed.
ONTARIO - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING
AI summary The document outlines Ontario's energy efficiency programming, referencing regulatory bodies, programs, and acronyms related to demand-side management, efficiency initiatives, and utility oversight. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia, Ontario Energy Board, and local distribution companies.
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (PG&E) – UTILITY OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) as part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, focusing on utility operations and energy efficiency initiatives.
Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) What is a MAD: It is the decision of record determining measure cost effectiveness and authorizing use of a measure. The measure is clearly defined along with the conditions under which it is approved. Th...
AI summary The Measure Assumptions Document (MAD) defines energy efficiency measures, their cost-effectiveness, and approval conditions. It outlines sections like Valid Date, Program, Market Segment, and Cost Effectiveness, with final assumptions and requirements. Energy Trust engineering staff approve MADs, though initial analysis often comes from Energy Trust delivery contractors.
APPENDIX A: MEASURE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
AI summary Appendix A outlines the Measure Development Process for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, involving the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). It references the Technical Reference Manual (TRM) and Energy Efficiency Resource Assessment Model (EERAM), incorporating inputs from the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) and Massachusetts Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC). The process evaluates program costs and benefits, aligning with regulatory frameworks.
LOAD AND CONSUMPTION INFORMATION
AI summary The document section titled 'LOAD AND CONSUMPTION INFORMATION' is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, likely addressing energy load data, consumption metrics, and related regulatory considerations. No substantive content is provided in the excerpt.
KEY PLAYERS
AI summary The 'KEY PLAYERS' section outlines key organizations, programs, and regulatory bodies involved in Nova Scotia's energy and utility proceedings. It includes acronyms for entities such as Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), Demand Side Management (DSM), and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), along with other provincial, national, and international stakeholders.
Electric Utilities 4 : - Bath Electric, Gas & Water Systems - Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. - Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. - Fishers Island Electric Corporation - City of Jamestown - Board of Public Utilities - Town...
AI summary List of electric utilities and municipalities involved in regulatory proceedings, including entities like Consolidated Edison, National Grid, and various local utilities. Footnote references a New York State Public Service Commission listing.
Electricity Market The following entities are the key players in the electricity system in Ontario. - New York Department of Public Service (Public Service Commission) - New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) -...
AI summary The document outlines key entities in Ontario's electricity system, including the New York Department of Public Service (DPS), New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), and New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), as part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding.
APPENDIX A-8: VERMONT (EFFICIENCY VERMONT)
AI summary Appendix A-8 discusses Vermont's Energy Efficiency Program (Efficiency Vermont) within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding context. It references energy efficiency initiatives, demand-side management, and related regulatory frameworks, though specific details of the proceeding are not provided in the text.
NATIONAL GRID – UTILITY OVERVIEW
AI summary The document provides an overview of National Grid's utility operations, referencing regulatory bodies, energy efficiency programs, and technical standards relevant to Nova Scotia. Key entities include Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB), Demand Side Management (DSM), and Efficiency Nova Scotia (EN). Topics focus on utility regulation and energy efficiency initiatives.
High Level Specifications
AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia, listing acronyms and entities involved in energy efficiency, demand-side management, and utility regulation. Key organizations include Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (EN), with references to programs like DSM and EEPS.
Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan FILED June 30, 2016 REVISED March 31, 2017
AI summary The document outlines the incentive-setting methodology for Nova Scotia's CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan, filed on June 30, 2016, and revised on March 31, 2017. It focuses on energy efficiency programs and regulatory processes, though no detailed arguments or specific claims are presented in the provided text.
EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16)
AI summary EfficiencyOne Inc. submits an incentive-setting methodology filing (E-ENS-R-16) for regulatory review in Nova Scotia. The filing outlines approaches for energy efficiency programs, involving the Utility and Review Board (UARB) and referencing the Technology Readiness Matrix (TRM).
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
AI summary The 'Policy Considerations' section is under review, with no detailed content provided in the text. Key entities and acronyms related to Nova Scotia's energy regulatory framework are listed, but no specific arguments or cross-references are mentioned.
FORMAL & DOCUMENTED INCENTIVE SETTING PROCESS It is recommended that ENS use a formal and documented incentive setting process for all incentive setting exercises. This does not necessarily mean that every step of the process needs to be f...
AI summary The document recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) adopt a formal, documented incentive-setting process for all exercises, with three potential processes outlined. It emphasizes documenting justifications for process steps and considering existing market incentives in customer, technology, and financial analyses to address barriers and attribution issues.
EXISTING INCENTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The existing incentive development process should be followed for all existing incentives. While it does not necessarily need to be step-wise, all four steps should be covered in the analysis. It woul...
AI summary The existing incentive development process requires all four steps to be completed, even if not followed step-wise. Step 4 cannot be completed without first completing steps 1-3. A figure illustrating the process is referenced.
Program Financial Simulation Analysis
AI summary The document outlines a Program Financial Simulation Analysis, referencing Nova Scotia regulatory proceedings and energy efficiency initiatives. Key entities include regulatory bodies, energy efficiency programs, and technical methodologies for evaluating program costs and benefits.
AI summary Figure 242324 outlines Union Gas's targets and budgets, likely related to energy efficiency programs and regulatory oversight. The context includes acronyms for regulatory bodies, energy efficiency initiatives, and technical terms used in utility planning and cost analysis.
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (PG&E) – UTILITY OVERVIEW
AI summary The document provides an overview of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) as part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, though no detailed content is included beyond the heading. Contextual acronyms and entities are listed for reference.
Savings PG&E's programs have proven very successful at reducing energy consumption and incentivizing energy efficient behaviours and investment decisions. In the 2013-2015 period, PG&E managed to achieve between 110-143 percent of annual g...
AI summary PG&E's energy efficiency programs exceeded their 2013-2015 savings goals, achieving 110-143% of annual gross energy savings and 130-164% of demand goals. The document references tables and external data sources to support these claims.
APPENDIX A-5: OREGON & WASHINGTON (ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON)
AI summary Appendix A-5 discusses energy efficiency initiatives in Oregon and Washington, focusing on the Energy Trust of Oregon. It outlines regulatory considerations, program structures, and evaluation methodologies relevant to demand-side management and energy efficiency resource standards.
Exceptions to Cost Effectiveness for Measure inclusion into programs 18 For measures which do not pass both the utility and societal (total resource cost) tests, the OPUC does allow measures to be included in programs assuming the measure...
AI summary The Oregon Public Utilities Commission (OPUC) allows measures to be included in programs even if they fail cost-effectiveness tests, provided they meet six conditions outlined in Docket UM-551, such as non-energy benefits, market acceptance, regional consistency, and legal compliance.
Electric Utilities 4 : - Bath Electric, Gas & Water Systems - Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. - Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. - Fishers Island Electric Corporation - City of Jamestown - Board of Public Utilities - Town...
AI summary The document lists numerous electric utilities, municipal departments, and related entities under the 'Electric Utilities' section, including corporations, towns, and boards. A footnote cites the New York State Public Service Commission's 'Electric Utilities Listing' as the source.
Natural Gas Utilities regulated by NYSPSC 5 : - Bath Electric, Gas & Water System - Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation - Chautauqua Utilities, Inc. - Consolidated Edison Company of N Y, Inc. - Corning Natural Gas Corporation - Empir...
AI summary The document lists natural gas utilities regulated by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC), including companies such as Consolidated Edison, Rochester Gas & Electric, and National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation.
APPENDIX A-8: VERMONT (EFFICIENCY VERMONT)
AI summary Appendix A-8 discusses Vermont's Efficiency Vermont program, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory proceedings. It includes references to various acronyms and entities involved in energy management and policy.
EFFICIENCY VERMONT –OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of Efficiency Vermont (EV), focusing on energy efficiency programs, regulatory proceedings, and related entities. Highlights key stakeholders, methodologies, and initiatives in demand-side management and energy conservation.
INCENTIVE ADMIN SPLIT
AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia focusing on the 'Incentive Admin Split,' involving energy efficiency programs, regulatory bodies, and technical methodologies. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia, Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance, and Utility and Review Board.
NATIONAL GRID - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING
AI summary The document outlines National Grid's Energy Efficiency Programming, focusing on regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia. It references key entities, acronyms, and topics related to energy efficiency, demand-side management, and regulatory frameworks.
High Level Specifications
AI summary The document outlines key terms and acronyms relevant to energy efficiency and utility regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia. It provides definitions for organizations, programs, and methodologies used in demand-side management, cost evaluation, and energy efficiency initiatives.
[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) EfficiencyOne c/o James R. Gogan The Breton Law Group Suite 300, 292 Charlotte Street Sydney NS B1P1C7 Dear Mr. Gogan:
AI summary A communication from EfficiencyOne, directed to James R. Gogan of The Breton Law Group, appears to be part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia. The text includes contact details and the start of a letter, but no substantive arguments or claims are explicitly stated.
M07544 - EfficiencyOne -Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) This is further to EfficiencyOne's letter of June 30,2016, enclosing CLEAResult's Incentive Setting Methodology Report as well as EfficiencyOne's Implementation Plan. The B...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submitted a report and implementation plan for incentive setting methodology. The Board seeks comments from interested parties by August 3, 2016, with replies due by August 17, 2016. The panel includes Peter W. Gurnham, Kulvinder S. Dhillon, and Roberta J. Clarke. Doreen Friis is the Regulatory Affairs Officer, and S. Bruce Outhouse is the Board Counsel.
M07544 - EfficiencyOne – Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) This is further to EfficiencyOne's letter of August 17, 2016, responding to comments submitted by Nova Scotia Power Inc. ("NSPI"), the Small Business Advocate ("SBA"), and...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to feedback on its incentive methodology from NSPI, SBA, and Synapse. The Board requests further clarification and consensus discussions. Previous concerns led to a 60% incentive cap for BES programs. E1 must report on consultations by November 15, 2016.
[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) EfficiencyOne c/o James R. Gogan The Breton Law Group Suite 300, 292 Charlotte Street Sydney NS B1P1C7 Dear Mr. Gogan:
AI summary A letter from EfficiencyOne to James R. Gogan of The Breton Law Group, part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. No specific arguments or topics discussed in the provided text.
M07544 - EfficiencyOne -Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) This is further to EfficiencyOne's letter of June 30,2016, enclosing CLEAResult's Incentive Setting Methodology Report as well as EfficiencyOne's Implementation Plan. The B...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submitted a letter with CLEAResult's Incentive Setting Methodology Report and an Implementation Plan. The Board seeks public comments on these documents by August 3, 2016, with replies due by August 17. The panel includes Peter W. Gurnham, Kulvinder S. Dhillon, and Roberta J. Clarke. Doreen Friis and S. Bruce Outhouse are involved in regulatory oversight.
retical incentive limit in principle. The literature includes a number of reports that describe incremental cost as a critical component for setting incentive levels. Two examples are provided below: - An early energy efficiency best pract...
AI summary The document discusses the use of incremental costs as a key factor in setting incentive thresholds for energy efficiency programs. It references studies by Quantum Consulting and NAPEE, noting that incremental costs help benchmark payments and set limits. Jurisdictions like Union Gas, BC Hydro, and Efficiency Maine use incremental costs as a core principle.
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 August 17, 2016 Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3 rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, NS B3J 3P6 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Af...
AI summary This document is a letter from James R. Gogan of Breton Law Group dated August 17, 2016, addressed to Doreen Friis of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board regarding regulatory proceeding File No. 41736-18. It outlines contact details and the formal submission context.
Re: M07544 – EfficiencyOne – Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) EfficiencyOne and CLEAResult have reviewed the letters of comment filed by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power), the Small Business Advocate (SBA), and Synapse Energy Eco...
AI summary EfficiencyOne and CLEAResult respond to comments from Nova Scotia Power Inc., the Small Business Advocate, and Synapse Energy Economics Inc. regarding their Incentive Setting Methodology Report and Implementation Plan. The response acknowledges the opportunity to address concerns raised in the letters of comment.
Response to NS Power's Letter of Comment – Implementation Plan Issues
AI summary The document outlines a response to NS Power's concerns regarding implementation plan issues in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. Key entities involved include NS Power, Synapse Energy Economics Inc., and the Small Business Advocate. The response addresses procedural and technical challenges in executing the plan, with emphasis on compliance and stakeholder engagement.
Response to NS Power's Letter of Comment – Report Issues
AI summary A response to NS Power's letter of comment addressing report issues, involving entities such as Synapse Energy Economics Inc., Efficiency Nova Scotia, and the Small Business Advocate. The proceeding pertains to regulatory matters related to utility services in Nova Scotia.
Response to Synapse Letter of Comment
AI summary The document is a response to a letter of comment from Synapse Energy Economics Inc., addressing regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). Key entities include NSP, Synapse, and the Small Business Advocate (SBA), with topics related to regulatory processes and stakeholder feedback.
October 6, 2016 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3rd Floor 1601 Lower Water Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 RE: M07544 - EfficiencyOne - Incentive Setting Methodology (E-EN...
AI summary On October 6, 2016, Synapse Energy Economics submitted reply comments to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board regarding EfficiencyOne and CLEAResult's August 17, 2016 letter on incentive setting methodology. The matter (M07544) involves a review of CLEAResult's methodology by Board Counsel.
M07544 - EfficiencyOne – Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) This is further to EfficiencyOne's letter of August 17, 2016, responding to comments submitted by Nova Scotia Power Inc. ("NSPI"), the Small Business Advocate ("SBA"), and...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) responds to feedback on its incentive-setting methodology from Nova Scotia Power Inc., the Small Business Advocate, and Synapse Energy Economics Inc. The Board requests further clarification and consensus discussions with Synapse and the DSM Advisory Group, citing unresolved concerns and prior directives from M06733. An incentive cap for Business Energy Solutions programs is also noted.
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 October 13, 2016 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs...
AI summary EfficiencyOne acknowledges a directive from the Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board to consult with Synapse and the DSM Advisory Group on its incentive-setting methodology. A report will be filed by November 15, 2016, following further discussions.
Background As the Board indicated in its correspondence of October 12, 2016, during the course of the proceedings with respect to the approval of the 2016 -2018 DSM Plan, concerns expressed regarding DSM incentives resulted in the Board di...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility Regulation Board directed EfficiencyOne to improve its incentive-setting methodology for energy efficiency programs following concerns raised during the 2016-2018 DSM Plan proceedings. EfficiencyOne engaged CleaResult to research best practices, filed a report, and responded to stakeholder comments from Synapse, SBA, and NS Power. The Board requested further consultations with Synapse and the DSM Advisory Group to address remaining concerns.
4. Use of the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (VWPSM)
AI summary The section discusses the application of the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (VWPSM) in the regulatory proceeding, likely related to cost or pricing analysis. The known acronym PAC (Program Administrator Cost) is referenced, though no detailed arguments or data are provided in the text.
M07544 - EfficiencyOne - Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) Further to the Board's direction of October 12, 2016, EfficiencyOne ("E1") filed a letter on November 15, 2016 updating its progress on this matter. In its letter, E1 requ...
AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) updated the Board on progress regarding the Incentive Setting Methodology, reporting consensus on outstanding issues and a revised timeline. The Board accepted these consensus positions, approved the revised timeline, and required an amended report by March 31, 2017, with stakeholder comments invited post-filing.
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 March 31, 2017 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Of...
AI summary EfficiencyOne and CleaResult submitted updated Incentive Setting Methodology and Implementation Plan documents to the Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board, reflecting consensus positions from a November 2016 letter. They also provided a redline version and an unchanged electronic tool. The Board will allow further stakeholder comments.
M07544 - EfficiencyOne - Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) EfficiencyOne filed its Revised Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan with the Board on March 31,2017. It has been posted to...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submitted a revised Incentive Setting Methodology report to the Board, inviting stakeholder comments by April 27, 2017, with replies due by May 11, 2017. The panel includes Peter W. Gurnham and Roberta J. Clarke. Doreen Friis and S. Bruce Outhouse are involved in the process.
File No: SM002557-00003 April 27, 2017 Nancy G. Rubin, Q.C. Direct Dial: 902.420-3337 [email protected] Delivered by E-mail Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3rd Floor 1601 Lower Wa...
AI summary The Industrial Group critiques EfficiencyOne's revised incentive methodology for lacking financial detail and not establishing a maximum incentive cap beyond 100%, which they deem illogical. The methodology was developed following the Board's 2016-2018 DSM Plan hearing directive, with the Industrial Group advocating for stricter financial analysis and incentive limits.
James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-18 May 11, 2017 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Offi...
AI summary James R. Gogan of The Breton Law Group submits revised documents for EfficiencyOne's Incentive Setting Methodology (M07544) in response to stakeholder comments, including a revised implementation plan, CLEAResult report, and redline version. The submission includes references to prior matter M06733.
Responses to Comments on Revised Report – Incentive Setting Methodology for EfficiencyOne May 11, 2017 Mark Robertson EfficiencyOne 230 Brownlow Avenue, Suite 300 Dartmouth, NS B3B 0G5 Dear Mr. Robertson:
AI summary The document outlines responses to comments on the revised incentive setting methodology for EfficiencyOne. It is addressed to Mark Robertson, with EfficiencyOne as the sender. The context involves regulatory proceedings related to energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia.
Appropriateness of Jurisdictional Scans CLEAResult maintains that the jurisdictions selected within the jurisdictional scan are appropriate.
AI summary CLEAResult asserts that the jurisdictions included in the jurisdictional scan are appropriate, as part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding evaluating the scope and relevance of the scan. The analysis focuses on the validity of the selected jurisdictions in the context of energy program assessments.
FORMAL & DOCUMENTED INCENTIVE SETTING PROCESS It is recommended that ENS use a formal and documented incentive setting process for all incentive setting exercises. This does not necessarily mean that every step of the process needs to be f...
AI summary The document recommends that Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) adopt a formal, documented incentive-setting process for all exercises, outlining three potential processes. It emphasizes considering existing market incentives in customer, technology, and financial analyses to address barriers, energy savings, and cost implications.
EXISTING INCENTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The existing incentive development process should be followed for all existing incentives. While it does not necessarily need to be step-wise, all four steps should be covered in the analysis. It woul...
AI summary The existing incentive development process requires adherence to four steps, with step 4 dependent on completing steps 1-3. The process is illustrated in Figure 12 but lacks specific details in the provided text.
Program Financial Simulation Analysis
AI summary The document outlines a financial simulation analysis for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory bodies, advisory groups, and cost methodologies. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, and various energy efficiency standards and programs.
APPENDIX A-1: ONTARIO ELECTRICITY
AI summary Appendix A-1 outlines Ontario's electricity regulatory context, listing acronyms and entities involved in energy efficiency, demand-side management, and utility regulation. Key organizations include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENS), Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (URB), and the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). Topics focus on energy efficiency programs, cost methodologies, and regulatory frameworks.
ONTARIO - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING
AI summary The document pertains to Ontario's energy efficiency programming, though no specific content or details are provided in the text. It includes a list of acronyms and entities relevant to energy regulation and efficiency initiatives.
APPENDIX A-6: NEW YORK (CONSOLIDATED EDISON)
AI summary This appendix references a regulatory proceeding involving New York and Consolidated Edison, though no detailed content or specific arguments are provided in the text. It appears to be a placeholder or incomplete section within a larger Nova Scotia regulatory document.
KEY PLAYERS
AI summary The 'KEY PLAYERS' section lists organizations, programs, and regulatory bodies involved in energy efficiency, utility regulation, and demand-side management in Nova Scotia and other regions. It includes acronyms for entities such as the Utility and Review Board, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, and various energy efficiency initiatives and methodologies.
Electric Utilities 4 : - Bath Electric, Gas & Water Systems - Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. - Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. - Fishers Island Electric Corporation - City of Jamestown - Board of Public Utilities - Town...
AI summary The document lists numerous electric utilities, municipalities, and regulatory bodies involved in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. It includes entities such as Consolidated Edison, National Grid, and various local utilities, along with a reference to the New York State Public Service Commission's 'Electric Utilities Listing'.
Natural Gas Utilities regulated by NYSPSC 5 : - Bath Electric, Gas & Water System - Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation - Chautauqua Utilities, Inc. - Consolidated Edison Company of N Y, Inc. - Corning Natural Gas Corporation - Empir...
AI summary The document lists natural gas utilities regulated by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC), including companies such as Consolidated Edison, Rochester Gas & Electric, and others. These entities are part of regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.
APPENDIX A-8: VERMONT (EFFICIENCY VERMONT)
AI summary The document references Appendix A-8 focusing on Vermont's Efficiency Vermont program, though the provided text is limited to the heading. It appears to be part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, possibly involving energy efficiency initiatives or related regulatory considerations.
EFFICIENCY VERMONT –OVERVIEW
AI summary The document provides an overview of Efficiency Vermont, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives, regulatory proceedings, and related programs. Key elements include demand-side management, technical reference manuals, and regulatory bodies involved in energy efficiency standards and cost evaluations.
NATIONAL GRID – UTILITY OVERVIEW
AI summary The document provides an overview of National Grid's utility operations in Nova Scotia, referencing regulatory frameworks, energy efficiency programs, and related acronyms. Key entities include Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (URB), Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), and various energy efficiency initiatives.
NATIONAL GRID - ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMMING
AI summary The document pertains to National Grid's energy efficiency programming initiatives, likely involving regulatory proceedings. Key focus areas include demand-side management, program evaluation, and compliance with energy efficiency standards. The context includes references to regulatory bodies, evaluation methodologies, and industry stakeholders.
High Level Specifications
AI summary The document provides a list of acronyms and their expansions related to energy efficiency, regulatory proceedings, and utility management in Nova Scotia and other jurisdictions. It serves as a reference for terminology used in regulatory analyses and proceedings.
Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan FILED June 30, 2016 REVISED March 31, 2017 SECOND REVISION May 11, 2017
AI summary The document outlines the incentive-setting methodology for Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding, referencing the CLEAResult Report and EfficiencyOne Implementation Plan. It includes filing and revision dates (June 2016, March 2017, May 2017) and is part of a regulatory process involving energy efficiency initiatives.
1 3.2 Recommendation 2 2
AI summary This section outlines Recommendation 2 from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) regarding demand-side management. The Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) is involved in the proceeding. The recommendation addresses regulatory considerations for utility services in Nova Scotia.
ated; and - 4. Absence of readily available tools to perform short-term cost effectiveness calculations. CLEAResult is providing the following recommendations for the identified areas of improvement:
AI summary CLEAResult recommends addressing four areas for improvement, including the absence of tools for short-term cost-effectiveness calculations. The recommendations aim to enhance regulatory processes in Nova Scotia's utility sector.
JURISDICTION IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION The selected jurisdictions were as follows: - Ontario (IESO); - Ontario (Union Gas); - British Columbia (BC Hydro); - California (PG&E); - Oregon (Energy Trust of Oregon); - Washington (Energy Trus...
AI summary The jurisdictions selected for comparison include Ontario, British Columbia, California, Oregon, Washington, New York, Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts, chosen for their best-in-class status, similar size, market structure, energy efficiency policies, program delivery models, and climate to Nova Scotia.
Review of Nova Scotia's Electricity System and Market
AI summary The document outlines a review of Nova Scotia's electricity system and market, with context provided on relevant acronyms and organizations involved in energy regulation and efficiency initiatives.
6. What is the proposed incentive, forecasted participation and
AI summary The section addresses proposed incentives, forecasted participation rates, and related methodologies for energy efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. Key considerations include cost-benefit analyses, program administration, and regulatory oversight by entities like the UARB and NSP.
Program Financial Simulation Analysis
AI summary The document outlines a Program Financial Simulation Analysis, though specific details are not provided in the text. It references regulatory and energy efficiency-related acronyms, suggesting the analysis may involve utility regulation, demand-side management, and cost methodologies.
Appendix A – Jurisdictional Scans
AI summary Appendix A – Jurisdictional Scans outlines regulatory considerations for energy efficiency and demand-side management in Nova Scotia. It references organizations, methodologies, and programs involved in utility regulation, including cost analysis frameworks and stakeholder groups.
ONTARIO (IESO) – OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of Ontario's IESO regulatory proceeding, listing key acronyms and entities involved in energy efficiency, demand-side management, and electricity system operations. Includes references to organizations, programs, and methodologies relevant to the proceeding.
APPENDIX A-5: OREGON & WASHINGTON (ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON)
AI summary Appendix A-5 discusses energy efficiency initiatives in Oregon and Washington, focusing on the Energy Trust of Oregon. It outlines regulatory considerations, program structures, and cost-benefit analyses for demand-side management and energy efficiency programs.
APPENDIX A-6: NEW YORK (CONSOLIDATED EDISON)
AI summary Appendix A-6 discusses regulatory proceedings involving Consolidated Edison in New York, contextualized within Nova Scotia's regulatory framework. It references energy efficiency programs, demand-side management, and technical methodologies like RULDICM and TRM, though specific details are limited to the heading.
KEY PLAYERS
AI summary The 'KEY PLAYERS' section lists organizations, programs, and legislation involved in Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding, including energy efficiency initiatives, utility boards, and technical advisory groups. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power (NSP), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance (CEEA), alongside methodologies like RULDICM and TRM.
APPENDIX A-8: VERMONT (EFFICIENCY VERMONT)
AI summary Appendix A-8 discusses Efficiency Vermont, focusing on energy efficiency programs and regulatory considerations. It references various acronyms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and cost methodologies.
Electric Utilities Vermont has 17 electric utilities. - 14 municipal electric utilities - 1 investor owned utility (IOU) - · 2 cooperatives Vermont's utilities range in size. The smallest is Village of Orleans Electric Department with 700...
AI summary Vermont has 17 electric utilities, including 14 municipal, 1 investor-owned (Green Mountain Power), and 2 cooperatives. Sizes range from 700 to 256,000 customers. Key entities include Green Mountain Power, Vermont Electric Cooperative, and Washington Electric Cooperative.
EFFICIENCY VERMONT –OVERVIEW
AI summary Overview of Efficiency Vermont, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives and regulatory considerations. The text outlines key programs, stakeholders, and methodologies related to demand-side management and energy conservation in Nova Scotia.
High Level Specifications
AI summary The document outlines high-level specifications for a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, listing numerous acronyms related to energy efficiency, utility regulation, and demand-side management. Key entities include regulatory bodies, programs, and technical methodologies relevant to energy policy and resource planning.
[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) EfficiencyOne c/o James R. Gogan The Breton Law Group Suite 300, 292 Charlotte Street Sydney, NS B1P1C7 Dear Mr. Gogan:
AI summary A communication from EfficiencyOne, addressed to James R. Gogan of The Breton Law Group, part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. The letter's context suggests involvement in regulatory matters, though specific arguments or topics are not detailed in the provided text.
M07544 EfficiencyOne Incentive Setting Methodology (E-ENS-R-16) Further to the Board's letter of April 6, 2017 regarding the EfficiencyOne ("E1") Revised Incentive Setting Methodology report, participant comments were received on April 27,...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board considers EfficiencyOne's revised Incentive Setting Methodology, addressing stakeholder comments and incorporating amendments. Key developments include a Consolidated Calculator for evaluating incentives, a Technical Reference Manual (TRM), and Synapse's recommendation for TRM review. The Board accepts the methodology and implementation plan, emphasizing their role in funding demand-side management (DSM) programs.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →