HomeHearing ProceduresM08059Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Hearing Procedures" in M08059

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) - Generation Utilization and Optimization
4 passages 2 documents

Hearing Procedures across all matters →

70411Proposed Terms of Reference 3 passages
Section 6
results, and developing a final report. We also understand that the outcome of the modeling process might be subject to a hearing in the early part of 2018. The steps below further itemize this scope.

AI summary The text outlines a modeling process leading to a final report, with potential hearing in early 2018. It emphasizes procedural steps and outcomes related to regulatory analysis.

Section 8
with greater coordination of unit commitment, dispatch, and reserve planning than is currently the case). f. Include additional constraints in NS as needed to reflect stability, voltage, inertia, minimum unit commitment, operation reserve...

AI summary The document outlines steps for enhancing grid modeling through Plexos, including stakeholder input, technical conferences, and regulatory hearings. It emphasizes coordination in unit commitment, dispatch, and reserve planning, with NSPI providing technical data. The process involves iterative modeling, quality assurance, and final reporting.

Section 9
conference in Halifax; solicit feedback at conference and from post-conference comments. d. Prepare final report post technical conference, addressing feedback. e. Attend hearing on final report.

AI summary The text outlines procedural steps involving a technical conference in Halifax, soliciting feedback, preparing a final report addressing that feedback, and attending a hearing on the report. These steps align with regulatory processes for stakeholder engagement and standardized filings.

70545Comments - NSPI 1 passage
Section 7
portunity to share schedules and work towards a mutually agreeable schedule that allows NS Power to provide Synapse with what it needs on a reasonable timeline that permits it to manage accordingly. NS Power believes that at a minimum, the...

AI summary NS Power requests a three-month extension to the timeline for Synapse's work, citing the need for stakeholder engagement and adequate modelling. It emphasizes the need for clear technical objectives in the TOR, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness criteria and definitions of terms like 'low,' 'medium,' and 'high' in Synapse's matrix.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →