Topic:"Hearing Procedures" in M09096

THE BRETON LAW GROUP James R. Gogan cc. Bruce Outhouse, Q.C., Board Counsel Brian Curry, NSPI Counsel Stephen MacDonald, Efficiency One John Aguinaga, EfficiencyOne Gina Thompson, EfficiencyOne Kate McDonald, EfficiencyOne

AI summary The Breton Law Group, represented by James R. Gogan, is involved in a regulatory proceeding with multiple counsel, including Board Counsel Bruce Outhouse, NSPI Counsel Brian Curry, and EfficiencyOne representatives.

EFFICIENCYONE ____________________________________ Per: James R. Gogan, EfficiencyOne Counsel Name and Address for Service:

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding involving EfficiencyOne, with James R. Gogan listed as counsel. It includes contact information for service but lacks substantive content about proceedings, arguments, or decisions.

Application of EfficiencyOne as Holder of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise FILED February 28, 2019

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks to hold the Efficiency Nova Scotia franchise, a regulatory proceeding filed on February 28, 2019. The application involves program management and compliance with Nova Scotia energy efficiency regulations.

3. PREFERRED DSM PLAN

AI summary The section titled 'Preferred DSM Plan' outlines considerations for demand-side management strategies within Nova Scotia's regulatory framework. Key acronyms include DSM, EECA, HST, NSP, and IRP, though no detailed arguments or specific proposals are present in the provided text.

6 4.1.2 What Role did the 2014 IRP Play in establishing the appropriate level of energy 7 savings in the Preferred Plan? 8 9 The level of energy savings identified in the IRP Preferred Resource Plan establishes 10 an objective DSM target w...

AI summary The 2014 IRP established a long-term DSM target of 141 GWh/year in the Preferred Plan, aligning with Mid-Level DSM to maximize ratepayer benefits. Flat or declining targets risk uneconomic decisions, as noted by the Board during the 2014 IRP process. The Preferred Plan's energy savings are deemed optimal for Nova Scotians.

the IRP levels before 23 additional energy savings benefits are lost to Nova Scotians. Unless the energy savings 24 targets in the next 3-year DSM Plan begin to move toward the 2014 IRP levels, there 1 is little opportunity for Nova Scotia...

AI summary The text highlights that failing to adjust DSM Plan targets toward 2014 IRP levels will result in lost energy savings for Nova Scotians. It emphasizes industry trends, including diversification beyond lighting savings and increasing energy savings as a percentage of electricity generation, which support the Preferred Plan's approach despite higher costs.

17 Alternate Scenario Energy Savings 18 19 The Alternate scenario will deliver approximately 125 GWh of incremental energy 20 savings for each year of the three-year plan period, for an average annual investment 21 of approximately $37 mil...

AI summary The Alternate Scenario Energy Savings plan aims to deliver 125 GWh of annual energy savings over three years with an average $37 million investment, as outlined in Table 12. This scenario is part of a regulatory proceeding evaluating energy efficiency initiatives.

5.3.6 Implementation Strategy

AI summary The document outlines an implementation strategy for demand-side management (DSM) and electricity efficiency programs in Nova Scotia. It references regulatory entities like NSUARB and NSP, along with acronyms related to energy policies, cost tests, and utility regulations. The strategy likely involves coordination between program administrators, utilities, and regulatory bodies.

Appendix B – Attachment 3: Assumptions Long-Term Rate and Bill Impact Analysis of the 2020-2022 DSM Plan

AI summary The document presents a long-term analysis of the rate and bill impacts of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2020-2022 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Plan, likely part of a regulatory proceeding involving the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB).

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY EFFICIENCYONE Direct Testimony of David G. Hill, Ph.D. Vermont Energy Investment Corporation On Behalf of EFFICIENCYONE February 26, 2019

AI summary The document pertains to a regulatory proceeding involving an application by EfficiencyOne, with David G. Hill, Ph.D. of the Vermont Energy Investment Corporation providing direct testimony on February 26, 2019.

22 II. Introduction and Summary

AI summary The document's 'Introduction and Summary' section outlines key acronyms and terms related to Nova Scotia's energy regulation, including demand-side management, efficiency programs, and regulatory frameworks. It sets the stage for a proceeding involving utility planning, cost tests, and stakeholder engagement.

23 Q: Please summarize your perspective, testimony, and primary finding. 24 A: First, as for my overall perspective, I am interested in encouraging initiatives and technology 25 that create economic value, enhance energy justice, protect c...

AI summary The testifier supports energy efficiency initiatives that create economic value and reduce emissions, emphasizing the need for program administrators to quantify savings. They highlight declining lighting savings due to technology changes and advocate for portfolio diversification to maintain cost-effectiveness. EfficiencyOne's approach to addressing these challenges is endorsed as strategic for Nova Scotia's ratepayers.

8 Q: Are there any other brief examples you can provide about approaches to mature or saturated

AI summary The document poses a question about examples of approaches to mature or saturated markets in regulatory proceedings but does not provide specific examples or detailed analysis in the text provided.

21 Q: Do the rebalanced / post-lighting transition portfolios remain cost effective? 33 Proposal Evaluation & Proposal Management Application (PEPMA), 2019. "Public Events" and other listings. [https://www.pepma-ca.com/public/PublicEvents....

AI summary The answer confirms that rebalanced/post-lighting transition portfolios remain cost-effective despite higher per-unit costs, citing Efficiency Vermont's benefit-to-cost ratios of 3.94 to 1 (2018–2020) and 2.78 to 1 (2018–2037). Table 4 provides metrics on cost effectiveness and performance.

13 Q. Does this experience in Vermont likely translate to other markets and regions in the United

AI summary The question asks whether Vermont's experience with demand-side management and energy efficiency programs can be applied to other markets and regions in the United States. The document text is incomplete, providing no direct analysis or conclusions from the proceeding.

- 2018 Maryland Public Service Commission. On behalf of Office of People's Counsel on EmPOWER Maryland Utilities Semi Annual Reports. Presentation and testimony, May 3, 2018. - 2018 Maryland Public Service Commission. On behalf of Office o...

AI summary Testimonies and presentations by the Office of People's Counsel on EmPOWER Maryland before Maryland and Pennsylvania regulatory bodies, focusing on energy efficiency programs, utility reporting, and plan evaluations from 2011 to 2018. Includes semi-annual reports, plan reviews, and legislative testimony.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY EFFICIENCYONE Direct Testimony of Glenn Reed Energy Futures Group On Behalf of EFFICIENCYONE February 27, 2019

AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act involving EfficiencyOne's application. Glenn Reed of Energy Futures Group provides testimony on behalf of EfficiencyOne during the hearing on February 27, 2019, related to energy efficiency initiatives.

Q: Why did you use forward-looking savings and budget projections, and not historic data, for

AI summary The use of forward-looking savings and budget projections over historic data allows for more accurate alignment with current and future program goals, market conditions, and regulatory requirements, ensuring better planning and resource allocation for demand-side management initiatives.

Q: Then are the available non-EfficiencyOne plans directly comparable in all other ways to the

AI summary The question examines whether non-EfficiencyOne plans are directly comparable to EfficiencyOne in all aspects within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, focusing on program evaluation and regulatory decision-making.

filed EfficiencyOne 2020-2022 Plan? Direct Testimony of Dr. David Hill, Vermont Energy Investment Corporation. In the Matter of the Public Utilities Act and in the Matter of an Application by EfficiencyOne. February 28, 2019.

AI summary Testimony by Dr. David Hill of Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) regarding EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding involves an application by EfficiencyOne, with testimony dated February 28, 2019.

5. NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 5.1 EfficiencyOne shall provide notice of Significant Changes to NSPI at the same time as EfficiencyOne makes application to the UARB for the approval of the Significant Changes. Subject to the terms...

AI summary EfficiencyOne must notify NSPI when applying to the UARB for approval of significant changes to the EECA Plan. NSPI may submit written comments to the UARB regarding these changes, subject to the Public Utilities Act and UARB's discretion.

Electronic TRM Review Presentation to DSMAG October 24, 2018 Traditional (print) TRM Appendix H

AI summary The document is a presentation to the DSMAG on October 24, 2018, discussing the transition from traditional print TRMs to electronic formats, focusing on Appendix H.

ENERGY STAR Integrated Screw Based SSL (LED) Lamps Measure Number: IV-E-13-d (Efficient Products Program, Lighting End Use)

AI summary The document references Measure Number IV-E-13-d under the Efficient Products Program's Lighting End Use category, focusing on ENERGY STAR Integrated Screw Based SSL (LED) Lamps as part of Nova Scotia's energy efficiency initiatives.

Queryable Datum Definitions (QDD) - Outputs

AI summary The document section 'Queryable Datum Definitions (QDD) - Outputs' contains no textual content, only image references (Figure 5 and Figure 6 from page 413). No substantive information, arguments, or entities are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.

ERRATA ____________________________________________________________________________________ to EfficiencyOne 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan Application and Evidence filed with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board on February 28, 2019 - 1....

AI summary An errata notice corrects numerical errors in EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan Application submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. Corrections include unit formatting (MT to kT) and updated investment figures for 2020-2022. The errata was filed on March 14, 2019.

EfficiencyOne IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended, - and – IN THE MATTER OF EfficiencyOne's 2018 Annual Progress Report.

AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended, focusing on EfficiencyOne's 2018 Annual Progress Report. The proceeding evaluates EfficiencyOne's compliance and performance under the Act.

3.3 Update on Evaluation and Verification Recommendations 11 12 13 10 An update on the status of evaluation and verification recommendations is set out in Attachment 1. - & lt;sup>40 Ibid [NSUARB Hearing Order], [1 October 2018] & lt;sup>4...

AI summary The section provides an update on the status of evaluation and verification recommendations, referencing specific NSUARB orders from 2018. The update is detailed in Attachment 1, with footnotes citing prior NSUARB Hearing and Board Orders.

EVALUATOR AND VERIFIER RECOMMENDATION UPDATES - Table 1: Update on Implementation of 2013-2016 Evaluation Recommendations - Table 2: Update on Implementation of 2013-2016 Verification Recommendations - Table 3: Update on Implementation of...

AI summary The document outlines updates on the implementation of evaluation and verification recommendations from 2013-2016 and 2017, presented in four tables. It focuses on progress tracking for regulatory proceedings related to energy management and rebate programs in Nova Scotia.

Appendix C. ENS Staff Interview Guide

AI summary Appendix C outlines an interview guide for ENS staff, part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. It includes known acronyms related to energy efficiency and stakeholder organizations, though no substantive content is provided in the excerpt.

Appendix D. ETN Member Interview Guide

AI summary Appendix D outlines an interview guide for ETN members, part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. It includes references to energy efficiency organizations, programs, and stakeholders involved in the process.

2.1. Document Review The evaluation team initially examined ENS documents to familiarize themselves with QA site visit practices and procedures. These documents included ENS's QA framework manual, QA reports, QA surveys, supplier performan...

AI summary The evaluation team reviewed ENS documents to understand QA site visit practices, including the QA framework manual, reports, surveys, and supplier performance records. Appendix A lists all consulted program documents.

Appendix B. ENS Staff Interview Guide

AI summary Appendix B outlines an interview guide used by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) staff during regulatory proceedings. The document serves as a tool for structured interviews, though specific content or questions are not detailed in the provided text.

[QACs] Q6. What is the QA committee's current role with regard to QA site visits? How has that changed over the past year? How, if at all, do you expect it to change over the next two years?

AI summary The question asks about the QA committee's current role in QA site visits, changes over the past year, and expected changes in the next two years.

QA Site Visit Effectiveness at Serving Intended Purpose I'd like to shift gears a bit and talk about how ENS uses QA site visits results. [ALL] Q31. Who reports QA site visit findings? Where are the findings documented? How are they commun...

AI summary The document explores the effectiveness of QA site visits in achieving their intended purpose, focusing on reporting processes, data collection, and program improvements. It questions how ENS uses findings, whether communication channels could be simplified, and if data sufficiency impacts performance assessments. The discussion also addresses potential adjustments to future site visit frequencies based on organizational track records.

Appendix C. QA Inspector Interview Guide

AI summary The document outlines Appendix C, which contains a QA Inspector Interview Guide. No substantive content or discussion is present in the provided text, only the heading of the appendix.

QA Site Visit Guidelines Now I'd like to talk about QA site visit guidelines. Q13. What guidelines has ENS provided to you to conduct QA site visits for [ insert first/second/third program ]? [ If no guidelines, skip to [Q19](#page-35-0) ]...

AI summary The document outlines QA site visit guidelines provided by ENS for programs, focusing on documentation, effectiveness, adherence challenges, cost-efficiency, and areas for improvement. Questions probe sampling approaches, site selection, frequency, data collection, and cost-minimization strategies.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended

AI summary This proceeding pertains to the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended, under the jurisdiction of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

2020-2022 DSM Plan NS Power Evidence M09096 April 12, 2019 NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary NS Power submitted evidence in the 2020-2022 Demand-Side Management (DSM) Plan as part of regulatory proceeding M09096 on April 12, 2019, under the Regulations of Nova Scotia (R.S.N.S.).

Q. What is the purpose of your testimony? - A. The purpose of my testimony is to provide the results of my assessment of - EfficiencyOne's (E1) Application for Approval of the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan - filed with the Board on February...

AI summary The testimony aims to present the assessment results of EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan application, filed with the Board on February 28, 2019, under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework.

Q. Why is critical consideration of the Mid DSM Case important in the context of these proceedings? A. It is important because EfficiencyOne continues to use the Mid DSM Case as a benchmark for assessing the reasonableness of the targets p...

AI summary EfficiencyOne uses the 2014 IRP Mid DSM Case as a benchmark for 2020-2022 DSM Plan targets, citing it as the best available data. However, the reliance on a 5-year-old study is criticized for not reflecting current energy savings realities in Nova Scotia.

11 Q. Do you agree with Mr. Reed's conclusions? - 12 A. No, I do not. I believe Mr. Reed's benchmarking analysis is flawed. Therefore, I question - the reasonableness of his conclusions. I recommend that the Board not put significant - wei...

AI summary The respondent disagrees with Mr. Reed's conclusions, citing flaws in his benchmarking analysis and advising the Board not to rely heavily on them regarding E1's Preferred Plan.

e American jurisdictions are indeed relevant in 47 EfficiencyOne Evidence, Appendix E, page 4 of 16, line 29 -page 5 of 16, line 9. & lt;sup>46 IR-59, page 1, lines 21-24. & lt;sup>48 Page 20 of 23 of "Efficiency Program Industry by State...

AI summary The analysis emphasizes that both American and Canadian jurisdictions are relevant for evaluating EfficiencyOne's Preferred Plan, with Canadian experience being more pertinent due to similar temperature patterns, winter peak demand, cultural considerations, and affordability measures.

in Nova Scotia, it has come at a price. Notwithstanding this progress, I question Mr. Reed's assertion that EfficiencyOne is a leading program administrator like those in his peer group. 54 EfficiencyOne has proposed a smaller DSM budget f...

AI summary The text questions whether EfficiencyOne is a peer to leading U.S. program administrators, noting its smaller DSM budget compared to peers. While supporting EfficiencyOne's budget judgment, it critiques the economic justification for the Preferred Plan and argues that comparing EfficiencyOne to top administrators is ideologically driven rather than representative of industry norms.

Q. Is Mr. Reed's decision to examine only leading program administrators consistent with his stated objective? A. No. As I discussed earlier, Mr. Reed's testimony stated that his objective was "to assess where EfficiencyOne falls compared...

AI summary The response argues that Mr. Reed's decision to exclude non-leading program administrators contradicts his stated objective of benchmarking EfficiencyOne against North American peers. The analysis highlights that his exclusion of average or lower DSM spending jurisdictions undermines the representativeness of the benchmarking group.

3 of "Efficiency Program Industry by State and Region Appendices, 2017," Consortium for Energy Efficiency; March 21, 2018 (https://library.cee1.org/system/files/library/13566/2017 AIR Data Tables.pdf) & lt;sup>61 EfficiencyOne Evidence, Ap...

AI summary The analysis questions whether Mr. Reed's benchmarking between EfficiencyOne and other program administrators is equitable. Mr. Levitan's testimony references EfficiencyOne's proposed 2020 investment increase and compares it to ACEEE data showing average U.S. state electric efficiency spending changes (0.87% over 2013-2017). Concerns are raised about unaddressed differences in Mr. Reed's methodology.

Q. Do you believe higher-priced EE measures beyond those in the 2019 DSM Plan are needed in Nova Scotia? EfficiencyOne's Evidence, page 20 of 62, lines 3-4. A. No. Higher-priced EE measures would likely reduce air emissions, including less...

AI summary EfficiencyOne opposes higher-priced EE measures beyond the 2019 DSM Plan, arguing that while they reduce emissions, the increased electricity rates for customers outweigh environmental benefits. The cost per kWh saved would be significantly higher, with short-term financial burdens on consumers.

Q. Mr. Levitan, does EfficiencyOne state that its Preferred Plan is affordable? 23 A. Yes, in its evidence EfficiencyOne states that the "Preferred Plan is affordable based 24 upon the guidance provided by this Board. The Preferred Plan st...

AI summary EfficiencyOne asserts its Preferred Plan is affordable based on the Board's guidance, balancing short and long-term affordability considerations. The response references specific evidence from EfficiencyOne's submission.

Q. What are the short-term costs required to achieve the DSM savings in the Preferred Plan? A. The targeted 7.4% increase in energy savings and 84% increase in capacity savings over the historical averages will necessitate a 23.1% increase...

AI summary The Preferred Plan requires a 23.1% increase in DSM investment in 2020 to achieve 7.4% higher energy savings and 84% higher capacity savings compared to historical averages. This contrasts with most other jurisdictions, which maintain flat or decreasing DSM spending. References include EfficiencyOne Evidence tables and Board decisions M06733 and M08604.

Q. Are Nova Scotians well-equipped to tolerate these increased short-term costs? - A. In my opinion, the answer is no. As mentioned previously, the six states in Mr. Reed's benchmarking analysis are among the most prosperous in the U.S. In...

AI summary Nova Scotians may struggle with increased short-term costs due to lower income compared to U.S. states and Canadian provinces. DSM measures targeting peak demand reduction could raise electricity rates but may be justified if benefits are bankable. Rate increases from 2020-2022 are projected across customer segments, with residential rates rising 3.25% and large industrial rates up to 7.78%.

- 1 Q. Mr. Levitan, have you reviewed EfficiencyOne's proposal to add Lifetime Energy - 2 Savings (LES) as a third Performance Target? - 3 A. Yes, I have. - 4 Q. Have LES been used previously to evaluate DSM plans in Nova Scotia? - 5 A. Ye...

AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes upgrading Lifetime Energy Savings (LES) from a Performance Indicator to a Performance Target in Nova Scotia's DSM plans. The expert disagrees, citing uncertainties in measure lifetimes and examples like CFL to LED replacements, which could lead to overestimation of savings. The DSMAG has not had sufficient time to provide feedback on the LES metric.

0. Has EfficiencyOne acknowledged the large amount of uncertainty regarding the 15 16 LES metric?

AI summary The document asks whether EfficiencyOne has acknowledged uncertainty in the 15-16 LES metric. The LES (Lifetime Energy Savings) metric's reliability is questioned, with implications for regulatory proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power and demand-side management programs.

Q. Mr. Levitan, do you think it would be premature for the Board to approve the use of LES as a third Performance Target in the 2020-2022 DSM plan? A. Yes, I do. EfficiencyOne has acknowledged that there they have less experience with LES...

AI summary Mr. Levitan argues it is premature to approve LES as a third Performance Target in the 2020-2022 DSM plan due to EfficiencyOne's limited experience with LES, an arbitrary threshold, and insufficient stakeholder input. He recommends using LES as a Performance Indicator instead and highlights the use of Navigant's ProCESS model with constraints to ensure realistic DSM outcomes.

Did EfficiencyOne consider more DSM scenarios other than Preferred Plan and Q. 10 11 Alternate scenario? A. Yes. According to EfficiencyOne, in response to stakeholder requests, EfficiencyOne 12 jointly with Navigant produced 3 additional...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) considered three additional DSM scenarios beyond the Preferred Plan and Q.10 11 Alternate scenario, including varying investment levels and demand reduction factors. However, E1 concedes these scenarios were not vetted and may not be deliverable.

AUCTIONS & PROCUREMENT Advised New York State Energy Research & Development Authority on the design and procurement of the first round offshore wind solicitation in downstate New York. Advised New Jersey Board of Public Utilities on the de...

AI summary The document details advisory and procurement services in energy sectors across multiple U.S. states, including offshore wind solicitations, capacity agreements, transmission studies, and regulatory support. Key activities include serving as an Independent Evaluator, managing procurements, and providing technical and legal testimony for utilities and regulatory bodies.

UTILITY EXPERIENCE Conducted production simulation analysis to support long term cogeneration rates for standardized contracts for Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Assisted in cost of service studies and rate cases (1978-1980).

AI summary The text discusses conducting production simulation analysis for long-term cogeneration rates and assisting in cost of service studies and rate cases from 1978 to 1980 for Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority - United Illuminating Company (multiple rounds) - Connecticut Light & Power Company (multiple rounds) - Peaking Docket (Prosecutorial Arm) - Office of Consumer Counsel (IRP docket) - Northe...

AI summary The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority oversees proceedings involving United Illuminating Company, Connecticut Light & Power Company, and the Peaking Docket. The Office of Consumer Counsel is involved in an Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) docket, while the Northeast Utilities / NSTAR merger is a key case under review.

New York Public Service Commission - PSEG-LI - Consolidated Edison Co. (nine dockets) - Orange & Rockland (three dockets)

AI summary The New York Public Service Commission is overseeing multiple regulatory proceedings involving PSEG-LI, Consolidated Edison Co. (nine dockets), and Orange & Rockland (three dockets). These cases likely address utility operations, compliance, or service-related matters.

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities - Orange & Rockland (three dockets) - GPU Energy - LCAPP Selection Process

AI summary The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities is handling three dockets involving Orange & Rockland and GPU Energy, alongside the LCAPP Selection Process. Key entities include utility companies and a capacity agreement pilot program.

Maryland Public Service Commission - MD PSC (multiple dockets) - Eastalco Aluminum Company

AI summary The Maryland Public Service Commission (MD PSC) is overseeing multiple regulatory dockets, with Eastalco Aluminum Company identified as a party involved in proceedings. The text highlights the commission's role in managing various cases and the participation of the aluminum company in related matters.

Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities - NStar (Carver to Cape Cod Transmission Line) - Enron Capital & Trade

AI summary The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities is referenced in a regulatory proceeding involving NStar's Carver to Cape Cod Transmission Line project and Enron Capital & Trade. The text highlights entities involved in energy infrastructure and financial services within the context of regulatory oversight.

Public Service Commission of Ohio West Ohio Gas Co.

AI summary The document references the Public Service Commission of Ohio and West Ohio Gas Co., indicating involvement in a regulatory proceeding. No further details or arguments are provided in the text.

Indiana Public Service commission Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co. (multiple dockets)

AI summary The Indiana Public Service Commission is handling multiple regulatory dockets involving Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co. The text provides no further details about the specific issues or proceedings.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Consumer Advocate / Small Business Advocate (Maritime Link)

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board document references the involvement of the Consumer Advocate and Small Business Advocate in proceedings related to the Maritime Link. The context highlights regulatory oversight and stakeholder representation in energy matters.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ISO-NE Exelon Mystic 8&9 Docket Nos. ER18-1509-000, ER19-1639-000 Gas Harmonization Quadrant New York City Generators (New York Independent System Operator) Docket No. ER11-2224-000 Southwest Gas Co. (E...

AI summary A list of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) docket numbers and associated entities involved in energy regulation, including ISO-NE, Con Edison, El Paso Natural Gas, and various pipeline companies. Cases cover gas harmonization, electricity generation, and pipeline projects across multiple regions.

New York Public Service Commission Consolidated Edison Co. (nine dockets) Docket No. 94-E0334 Orange & Rockland (three dockets)

AI summary The New York Public Service Commission is managing multiple regulatory dockets involving Consolidated Edison Co. (nine dockets under Docket No. 94-E0334) and Orange & Rockland (three dockets). These proceedings likely address utility-related regulatory matters.

Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities Enron Capital & Trade Docket No. D.P.U. 97-94

AI summary The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities is associated with Enron Capital & Trade Docket No. D.P.U. 97-94, indicating a regulatory proceeding involving Enron Capital & Trade.

Michigan Public Service Commission Wisconsin Electric Power Company, d/b/a We Energies Case No. U-16366

AI summary The Michigan Public Service Commission is handling a case involving Wisconsin Electric Power Company, d/b/a We Energies, under Case No. U-16366. No further details about the case's subject matter or arguments are provided in the text.

New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Public Service Company of New Hampshire Case DE 10-261 Enron Energy Services Docket No. D.T.E. 97-251

AI summary The New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission is handling a case involving Public Service Company of New Hampshire (Case DE 10-261) and a related docket from Enron Energy Services (Docket No. D.T.E. 97-251).

Public Service Commission of Ohio West Ohio Gas Co. Docket No. 85-0020-GA-GCR

AI summary The Public Service Commission of Ohio is handling Docket No. 85-0020-GA-GCR related to West Ohio Gas Co. No further details are provided in the text.

Bonneville Power Administration Intalco Aluminum Co. Docket No. 95-420-C

AI summary The Bonneville Power Administration is involved in a regulatory proceeding related to Intalco Aluminum Co. under Docket No. 95-420-C.

California Public Utilities Commission Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Case No. 85-20-Ga-GCR Southern California Edison Co. (multiple rounds)

AI summary The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is managing regulatory proceedings involving Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Case No. 85-20-Ga-GCR) and Southern California Edison Co. (multiple rounds of proceedings).

Indiana Public Service Commission Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. Case Nos. 35780-S4, 35780-S8

AI summary The Indiana Public Service Commission is handling two cases (35780-S4, 35780-S8) involving Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. The proceeding appears to focus on regulatory matters related to the company's operations or compliance.

Régie De L'Énergie du Québec L'Association des Industries Forestières du Québec Docket No. D.P.U. 96-25

AI summary The Quebec Forest Industry Association is involved in a regulatory proceeding under the Quebec Energy Board, referenced by Docket No. D.P.U. 96-25. The case pertains to regulatory matters involving the forest industry sector in Quebec.

Attachment RLL-2 Page 4 of 4 2020-2022 DSM Plan Evidence Appendix A Page 101 of 103 Puget Sound Energy Docket No. C95-1833R

AI summary The document references Puget Sound Energy's regulatory docket C95-1833R, which is part of the 2020-2022 DSM Plan Evidence Appendix. It indicates a regulatory proceeding involving demand-side management initiatives and associated evidence submission.

2019 DSM Resource Plan (M08604) UARB Order (July 18, 2018) […]6. NSPI is also directed to provide E1, and the DSM Advisory Group, its suggested revisions to the rate and bill impact analysis (RBIA) by September 30, 2018.

AI summary The UARB Order (July 18, 2018) directs NSPI to submit revised rate and bill impact analysis (RBIA) to E1 and the DSM Advisory Group by September 30, 2018, as part of the 2019 DSM Resource Plan (M08604) proceeding.

Illustration of differences in Rate Changes as a Result of Changes in Treatment of Avoided Generation Costs

AI summary The document illustrates differences in rate changes resulting from varying treatments of avoided generation costs. It includes figures and images from page 153, highlighting analysis related to regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia.

11 Table 1: EfficiencyOne Spending by Year Nominal vs. 2019 Dollars Year Investment in Nominal Dollars ($ millions) Investment in 2019 Dollars ($ millions) 2015 Actual 32.0 34.7 2016 Actual 30.8 33.0 2017 Actual 30.3 32.0 2018 Actual 33.9...

AI summary Table 1 compares EfficiencyOne's annual spending from 2015 to 2022 in nominal dollars and 2019-adjusted dollars, showing increasing investment trends. The document also notes EfficiencyOne's responses to the Consumer Advocate, indicating regulatory scrutiny of their spending plans.

Calculation BER-IR low income savings = [(BER-MI low income savings) / (BER-MI total savings)] x BER-IR total savings

AI summary The document presents a calculation method for BER-IR low-income savings, derived from BER-MI low-income and total savings metrics, scaled by BER-IR total savings. This is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding analyzing energy efficiency programs and utility planning.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL - 1 If the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) approved a level of energy savings and - 2 investment that differs from EfficiencyOne's Preferred Plan or Alternate Scenario, - 3 EfficiencyOne would be required to...

AI summary If the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) approves energy savings and investment levels differing from EfficiencyOne's (E1) Preferred Plan, E1 must file a Compliance Filing. Sector impacts would be considered. E1 references their response to NSUARB-Pronko IR-06, with Ecology Action Centre (EAC) involvement noted.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 g) Please refer to EfficiencyOne's response to Heritage Gas IR-01-part h). Date Filed: May 13, 2019 E1 (Heritage Gas) IR-02 Page 5 of 5 E1 Responses to Heritage Gas Limited (Heritage Gas)

AI summary The document references EfficiencyOne's response to Heritage Gas's inquiry (IR-01-part h) and includes E1's (Heritage Gas) response to Heritage Gas Limited on May 13, 2019, related to IR-02. It outlines procedural exchanges within a regulatory proceeding.

20. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION - 20.1 This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either Party, in whole or in part, upon the happening of one or more of the following events: - (a) EfficiencyOne's Franchise is terminated and the Agreemen...

AI summary Section 20 outlines termination conditions for the Agreement, including termination by either party if EfficiencyOne's franchise is terminated or the UARB approves termination. No compensation is allowed for consequential losses. Section 21 details notification procedures, including addresses for NSPI and EfficiencyOne, and methods for delivering notices (fax, courier, mail).

Confidential Information 1. The Parties agree that for the purpose of this Agreement "Confidential Information" means all information, regardless of the form in which it is communicated or maintained and prepared by the Disclosing Party, a...

AI summary The Parties define 'Confidential Information' broadly, encompassing all non-public data shared under the Supply Agreement, legislation, or directives from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. This includes reports, analyses, intellectual property, and materials filed with the Board in confidence. The definition also covers access credentials for electronic information.

Permitted Disclosures - 6. The Recipient shall be permitted to disclose relevant aspects of the Confidential Information to its employees and professional advisors to the extent that such disclosure is reasonably necessary for the performa...

AI summary The Recipient may disclose confidential information to employees and advisors with proper undertakings, notifying the Disclosing Party and ensuring compliance. Non-disclosure obligations do not apply if disclosure is legally required, but the Recipient must notify the Disclosing Party, seek protective orders, and remove commercially sensitive information when possible.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL for the same codes and regulations evaluated in 2015. This is due to a lack of new national and provincial energy efficiency regulations in 2016. These impacts in 2016 were: 23.5 GWh annual energy savings and system peak d...

AI summary The document outlines energy and demand savings from 2016 to 2022, noting 23.5 GWh and 5.0 MW savings in 2016, decreasing to 21.9 GWh and 4.0 MW in 2017. Savings for 2018 remain stable, while 2019–2022 savings are unquantified due to lack of new regulations. The analysis emphasizes that future savings from regulations will align in both the Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario, with code changes impacting the 2020–2022 DSM Resource Plan.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-04: 2 3 (a) The delivery of energy over the Maritime Link, an updated IRP, rate structure 4 changes (TOU), and the conclusion of the Government enacted Rate Stabilization 5 period, will all have significant im...

AI summary The document asks if changes in energy delivery via the Maritime Link, updated IRP, rate structure changes (TOU), and the conclusion of the Government enacted Rate Stabilization period will impact the 2020-22 DSM delivery compared to the 2023-25 plan. EfficiencyOne refers to previous responses, indicating no other major influences on the 2020-22 DSM plan.

rovide these comments. Nancy Rubin Nancy G. Rubin, Q.C. I Stewart McKelvey 902.420.3337 I www.stewartmckelvey.com I Halifax, NS From: DSMAG Sent: December 20, 2018 12:44 PM To: Albert Dominie ([email protected]); Alice Napoleon; Bill M...

AI summary DSMAG seeks stakeholder feedback on the 2020-2022 DSM Plan update, requesting input on client perspectives and potential gaps in the Preferred and Alternate DSM Plans. Comments were due by December 21, 2018, with materials provided via email and SharePoint.

5. We support research and implementation of moderate income programming. During the discussion at Dal Legal Aid December 5, EfficiencyOne representatives stated that you intend to research programming for moderate income households simila...

AI summary The Affordable Energy Coalition supports research into moderate income energy programs, citing past initiatives by Conserve NS and Efficiency Nova Scotia (2010-11). They acknowledge challenges faced by households above LICO thresholds and advocate for equitable access to energy efficiency measures. The letter praises collaboration with EfficiencyOne and acknowledges contributions from various stakeholders.

Presented to January 7, 2014 Presented by Todd Williams, Managing Director One Adelaide Street East, Suite 3000 Toronto, ON M5C 2V9 647.288.5204, [email protected] Stu Slote, Associate Director (Project Manager) 802.526.5113, Stu....

AI summary A presentation dated January 7, 2014, submitted by Navigant's team including Todd Williams, Stu Slote, and Gary Cullen. The document includes contact details for the presenters and references Navigant's website.

uction. Net‐to‐gross (NTG) Ratio : a factor representing net program savings divided by gross program savings that is applied to gross program impacts to convert them into net program load impacts Portfolio: either a collection of similar...

AI summary The glossary defines key terms related to energy efficiency programs, including Net-to-Gross (NTG) Ratio, Program Potential, Retrofit, and others, which are essential for evaluating program impacts, design, and implementation strategies in regulatory proceedings.

Nova Scotia 2012 Baseline Study:

AI summary The Nova Scotia 2012 Baseline Study examines energy efficiency initiatives, involving organizations like Nova Scotia Power and EfficiencyOne, with focus on Demand Side Management (DSM) and regulatory frameworks. Key entities include government agencies, research centers, and energy efficiency programs, highlighting data analysis and cost methodologies.

7.8 BNI Refrigeration

AI summary Section 7.8 of the regulatory proceeding document focuses on BNI Refrigeration, though no further details or arguments are provided in the text. The section likely pertains to energy efficiency, refrigeration technologies, or related regulatory considerations under Nova Scotia's energy framework.

7.9 BNI Motors and Compressed Air

AI summary Section 7.9 discusses BNI Motors and Compressed Air within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. The context includes numerous acronyms related to energy efficiency, regulation, and organizations involved in energy management and policy.

7.10.2 Water Heater Capacity

AI summary Section 7.10.2 of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document addresses water heater capacity, likely involving energy efficiency and regulatory considerations. The context includes acronyms related to energy programs, regulatory bodies, and efficiency standards.

ENSC Commercial Baseline Survey

AI summary The document heading 'ENSC Commercial Baseline Survey' indicates a regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency data collection in Nova Scotia. No substantive content is provided beyond the heading and acronym definitions, which include organizations, programs, and technical terms relevant to energy regulation and efficiency initiatives.

NAVIGANT Date Filed: May 13, 2019 ENSC Commercial Baseline Survey Site # Form 18

AI summary The document references a form (Form 18) submitted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) as part of a commercial baseline survey, dated May 13, 2019. It pertains to a regulatory proceeding involving energy efficiency data collection and analysis in Nova Scotia.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-10: Referring to Efficiency One 2020-2022 DSM Plan Application Table 6, pg. 25-26, and Table 7, pg. 28, which outline the proposed DSM programs and potential barriers to participation. Affordability seems to be...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) requested a comparative analysis between savings from affordability improvements in EfficiencyOne's DSM plan and estimated electricity rate increases. EfficiencyOne responded that such analysis was conducted in Appendix B of their application, addressing rate and bill impacts for the Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario.

Request IR-33: How does E1 explain the differences in first year impacts across both E1 and NSP's plans? Response IR-33: - Table 1 below presents the first-year impacts from the model outputs provided to NS Power from - Navigant and Effici...

AI summary The regulatory proceeding seeks an explanation from EfficiencyOne (EOne) regarding discrepancies in first-year impact estimates between their Preferred Plan and Alternate Scenario and Nova Scotia Power's (NSP) plan, referencing model outputs in Table 1.

Source Information for this Discussion - 2016 Consensus Agreement - Stakeholder comments, EfficiencyOne replies, and UARB letters re: EfficiencyOne's 2017 and 2018 historical RBIA filings - Additional suggestions from NS Power in October 2...

AI summary The discussion references the 2016 Consensus Agreement, stakeholder comments, EfficiencyOne's 2017-2018 RBIA filings, NS Power's 2018 suggestions, and the introduction of New Issues #1 and #6 in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding.

2017 Summary of Actions (from EfficiencyOne reply comments)

AI summary The 2017 Summary of Actions outlines EfficiencyOne's reply comments in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, though specific details of the actions or arguments are not provided in the text.

2017_ENS_1f) Modeling of billed demand reductions

AI summary The document addresses the modeling of billed demand reductions within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, focusing on methodologies for forecasting demand-side management impacts. It involves analysis of programs like AMI and DSM, with implications for utility rate structures and cost-of-service studies.

2017_ENS_1g) The energy and demand cost escalation rate

AI summary The 2017 regulatory proceeding addresses the energy and demand cost escalation rate, focusing on Nova Scotia Power's (NSP) rate structures and potential impacts on consumers, with oversight by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB).

Date Filed: May 13, 2019 2017_DSMAG_1) Review and discuss results of ENS and NS Power collaboration on issues listed above, as well as any other outstanding issues or questions - EfficiencyOne invited comments from stakeholders after NS Po...

AI summary EfficiencyOne invited stakeholder comments on NS Power's October 2018 DSMAG presentation but received none. It now seeks comments on proposed actions by January 31, 2019, related to the 2017_DSMAG_1 proceeding.

2017_DSMAG_2) Discuss treatment of Municipal Electric Utilities as customers of NS Power within the RBIA model

AI summary The document discusses the treatment of Municipal Electric Utilities as customers of Nova Scotia Power (NSP) within the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) model. Key considerations involve regulatory frameworks, cost allocation, and the role of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) in oversight.

2017_DSMAG_3) Discuss treatment and first usage of NS Power rate impact model

AI summary The document discusses the initial application and treatment of NS Power's rate impact model within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, likely involving the NSUARB and the DSMAG. The focus is on how the model is being used for the first time in this context, possibly related to demand-side management initiatives.

Issue • The DSMAG has not had the opportunity to address this issue as NS Power has not provided any information about this model

AI summary The DSMAG has not had the opportunity to address the issue due to NS Power's failure to provide information about a specific model. This lack of information has hindered the advisory group's ability to engage with the matter.

NEW_1) Which avoided costs to use when avoided cost estimates change

AI summary The document addresses the regulatory challenge of selecting appropriate avoided cost estimates when initial projections change, involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). The discussion centers on methodology for updating avoided costs in utility proceedings, with implications for demand-side management and rate design.

Issue • Application of avoided costs in the model is inconsistent with cost justification used for DSM Plan approvals

AI summary The issue highlights a discrepancy between the application of avoided costs in a model and the cost justification used for approving DSM Plans. This inconsistency raises concerns about alignment between modeling practices and regulatory approval criteria for demand-side management initiatives.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL NS Power does not track the number of Budget Settlement Agreements that are breached. Date Filed: May 13, 2019 NSPI (AEC) IR-06 Page 2 of 2

AI summary NS Power asserts it does not track breaches of Budget Settlement Agreements. The document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, with a filing date of May 13, 2019, and references NSPI (AEC) IR-06.

AI summary A redacted regulatory proceeding document related to Nova Scotia Power's Demand Side Management (DSM) program from 2020-2022. The document is part of a confidential submission to the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB), focusing on DSM initiatives under Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI).

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 calculated the sum of heating and cooling degree days over the past 36 months for 2 comparison purposes. 3 4 Figure 1 below summarizes the comparison of cooling degree days and Figure 2 below 5 summarizes the comparison...

AI summary The analysis compares Nova Scotia's heating and cooling degree days with Canadian provinces and U.S. states, concluding that Nova Scotia's climate is more similar to Canadian provinces. Heating degree days (10,202) are closer to the provincial average (11,843) than the U.S. peer group average (7,319). Cooling degree days (1,227) are also closer to the provincial average (1,268) than the U.S. average (2,799), highlighting temperature pattern differences.

From Richard Levitan, Levitan & Associates, Inc.: (a) In this context "obsolete" means something is no longer the best solution because a better, more cost-effective solution is available. (b) I refer to a situation in which an EE measure...

AI summary The text defines 'obsolete' in the context of energy efficiency (EE) measures, arguing that implementing EE solutions in 2020 may become outdated if more cost-effective technologies emerge. Rapid technological advancements and uncertainty in long-term benefits raise concerns about the value of current EE investments relative to certain costs.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The document you are attempting to access has been filed in confidence. Some exhibits, noted as confidential, contain information which if released might cause financial or other harm to the party filing it, or which...

AI summary The document is marked confidential, with access restricted under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's rules. Confidential exhibits may harm parties or violate privacy laws. Public redacted versions are available, and access requires a Confidentiality Agreement. Contact details for the Board are provided, along with document number 258806.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Please provide NSP's most current avoided costs for both energy and capacity from years 4 2020-2040. 5 6 Response IR-1: 7 8 Please refer to NSUARB IR-7. Date Filed: May 13, 2019 NSPI (EAC) IR-1 Page 1 o...

AI summary The document contains a request (IR-1) for Nova Scotia Power's (NSP) avoided costs from 2020-2040 and a response directing to NSUARB IR-7. The filing date is May 13, 2019, and the matter is labeled NSPI (EAC) IR-1.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-2: 2 3 Have you done any analysis on the maximum cost-effective level of achievable efficiency? 4 5 (a) Please provide costs and savings by year from this scenario 6 (b) Please provide all analyses and workpap...

AI summary The document contains a request (IR-2) seeking analysis on maximum cost-effective efficiency levels, with subparts requesting cost data, supporting analyses, and explanations of avoided cost differences. The response directs to SBA IR-8 for details.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-5: 2 3 Please file the 2018 10-Year System Outlook or provide a link to it for use in this matter. 4 5 Response IR-5: 6 7 Please refer to Attachment 1. Date Filed: May 13, 2019 NSPI (IG) IR-5 Page 1 of 1

AI summary The document includes a request (IR-5) for the 2018 10-Year System Outlook and a response directing the reader to Attachment 1. Filed by NSPI on May 13, 2019, the exchange pertains to regulatory proceedings involving NSPI and the NSUARB.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended

AI summary This document pertains to a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended, overseen by the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). The proceeding involves the application of the Act to regulate utility services in Nova Scotia.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted attachment from a 2020-2022 Nova Scotia Demand Side Management (DSM) regulatory proceeding. It involves the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI/NS Power), and the NS Power System Operator (NSPSO).

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is an attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) from 2020-2022. It involves the NSUARB, NSPI, NS Power, and NSPSO. The content is redacted, with confidential information removed, and no specific arguments or claims are visible in the provided text.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted page from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding relates to the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Integrated Gas (IG) IR-05 filing. The document is part of a larger submission involving Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), though specific content details are confidential.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 25 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from a 2020-2022 Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM). Confidential information has been removed, and no specific content or arguments are visible in the provided text.

1 3.3.4 Steam Fleet Retirement Outlook As stated in NS Power's submission to the UARB dated June 7, 2018[11](#page-32-1) 2 in regard to 3 Synapse Energy Economic Inc.'s (Synapse) Generation Utilization and Optimization 4 report (M08059) fi...

AI summary NS Power's submission to the NSUARB indicates that retaining the coal fleet until 2030 is cost-effective based on Synapse's report, though uncertainty remains due to pending carbon regulations. The company expects resolution by late 2018, enabling an Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) exercise in 2019. Discussions on carbon policy amendments and equivalency agreements between Nova Scotia and the Canadian government are ongoing.

1 [Figure](#page-42-3) 21 . 2

AI summary The text references a figure from a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.

20 7.3 Capacity Contribution of Renewable Resources in Nova Scotia 21

AI summary Section 7.3 of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding discusses the capacity contribution of renewable resources, focusing on their role in meeting energy demands and regulatory frameworks. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

1 8.0 TRANSMISSION PLANNING 2

AI summary The section titled '8.0 TRANSMISSION PLANNING' outlines regulatory considerations for transmission infrastructure in Nova Scotia. Key entities involved include Nova Scotia Power Inc. and regulatory bodies like the NSUARB. The context includes acronyms related to energy planning, interconnection, and reliability standards.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 57 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary Redacted attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives between 2020-2022. Context involves the NSUARB and NSPI, though specific content is confidential.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 58 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted attachment from a 2020-2022 Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM). It is part of a larger submission and contains confidential information removed for disclosure.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 69 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) from 2020-2022. Confidential information has been redacted, and the text refers to procedural elements involving the NSUARB and NSPI. Key focus areas include DSM initiatives and interconnection processes.

3.0 Technical Analysis

AI summary The document section '3.0 Technical Analysis' outlines a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia's utility sector, referencing numerous acronyms related to energy planning, grid management, and regulatory bodies. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, with topics focusing on technical infrastructure and interconnection standards.

Appendix H Stability Results 2021SUM Cases 2018 10 Year System Outlook Report Appendix B Page 84 of 84 2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 158 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2017 NRIS Wind Study

AI summary Appendix H presents stability results for the 2021SUM cases, referencing the 2017 NRIS Wind Study. Key entities include Nova Scotia regulatory bodies and energy programs, with topics focusing on system stability, wind energy integration, and regulatory proceedings.

Appendix I Stability Results 2021WIN Cases 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (NSUARB M09096) NSPI Responses to Industrial Group Information Requests

AI summary The document references the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under NSUARB matter M09096 and NSPI's responses to Industrial Group information requests.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-08 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted attachment from a Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) proceeding related to Nova Scotia Power's (NSP) Demand Side Management (DSM) program from 2020-2022. Confidential information has been removed, and no substantive content is visible in the provided text.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is an attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) between 2020-2022. It is part of a submission to the NSUARB (Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board) and references Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). No substantive content is visible due to redaction.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted attachment from a 2020-2022 Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) by Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). The content is confidential and removed, but the proceeding context involves regulatory oversight of energy programs.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) programs from 2020-2022. It is an attachment to a NSUARB proceeding (IR-11) and includes page 6 of 40. Key entities involved include Nova Scotia Power, Efficiency Nova Scotia, and the Nova Scotia Department of Energy and Mines.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is an attachment from a 2020-2022 Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM). It contains confidential information removed from Page 9 of 40, with no substantive content provided in the excerpt.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) from 2020-2022. It involves the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) and Nova Scotia Power (NSP), with confidential information removed.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 17 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is an attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) from 2020-2022. It is part of a submission to the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) under IR-11. The content is confidential and removed, but the document's context suggests it involves energy efficiency programs, utility regulations, and potential stakeholder submissions.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 28 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is an attachment from a 2020-2022 Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM). It references entities like Nova Scotia Power (NSP), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Canadian Solar Industries Association (CanSIA), though specific details are confidential.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 33 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary A redacted document from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) programs under the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB). Key entities include Nova Scotia Power (NSP), Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), and the Department of Energy and Mines (DOEM). Topics focus on regulatory proceedings, energy efficiency initiatives, and stakeholder involvement.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 34 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) CONCLUSION Findings from the study highlight the following key takeaways:

AI summary The document presents findings from a 2020-2022 study under a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, highlighting key takeaways related to demand-side management (DSM) and utility regulation. The text is redacted, with only a conclusion section and an image reference provided.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 37 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is an attachment from a Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB) proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) programs from 2020-2022. It is part of a regulatory filing involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), with confidential information removed.

2020-2022 DSM NSUARB IR-11 Attachment 1 Page 38 of 40 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) between 2020-2022. It is part of the NSUARB IR-11 file and contains confidential information removed. The text does not include substantive content due to redaction.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that E1 publish the attached Notice of Hearing in the Halifax Chronicle Herald and the Cape Breton Post in accordance with the following schedule: - Wednesday, March 6, 2019; - Saturday, March 9, 2019; and - Wedne...

AI summary The document contains an order requiring E1 to publish a Notice of Hearing in specific newspapers and post the Application on its website, dated March 1, 2019.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EfficiencyOne (E1) has made Application to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for Approval of Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power), a final agreement, and a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. A public hearing will occur from June 10-14, 2019, with participation options outlined.

5.0 APPROVAL OF SUPPLY AGREEMENT [67] The Board has reviewed the form of Supply Agreement attached as Appendix "G" to Exhibit E-1. Subject to any changes needed to implement the findings in this Decision, the form of Agreement is satisfact...

AI summary The Board has reviewed the Supply Agreement in Appendix G of Exhibit E-1 and finds it satisfactory, pending changes based on the decision's findings. The final agreement will be included in the compliance filing.

In the event DSMAG agreement on final revised terms of reference cannot be achieved by June 30, 2020, the finalization ofthe revised terms ofreference shall be referred to the UARB for determination. - 8. The existing HomeWarming program f...

AI summary The document outlines terms for DSMAG agreement deadlines, the transition of the HomeWarming program to E1 for 2020-2022, and mutual non-opposition to 2018 DSM evaluation and verification reports. Parties agree not to file rebuttal evidence but retain rights for future challenges.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS EffidencyOne ("El") Is the Franchise Holder In accordance with the Public UtilitiesAM; AND WHEREAS EldeneyGrie has filed an application with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, in accordance with the prov...

AI summary The Settlement Agreement between EfficiencyOne (E1) and Heritage Gas Limited (HG) addresses issues raised by HG in the proceeding regarding the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan and Supply Agreement with NS Power. Both parties agree to settle certain matters, reserving the right to amend positions based on further evidence.

In the event DSMAG agreement on final revised terms of reference cannot be achieved by June 30, 2020, the finalization ofthe revised terms ofreference shall be referred to the UARB for determination. - 8. The existing HomeWarming program f...

AI summary The document outlines terms for DSMAG agreement deadlines, transfers the HomeWarming program to El for 2020-2022, and notes non-opposition to 2018 DSM reports. Parties agree not to file rebuttal evidence but reserve rights for future challenges. The proceeding relates to the Public Utilities Act and references Board Order M09O96.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS EfficiencyOne ("El") Is the Franchise Holder in accordance with the Public Utilities Act; AND WHEREAS EfficiencyOne has filed an application with file Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, in accordance with th...

AI summary A Settlement Agreement between EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) regarding the approval of a Supply Agreement and 2020-22 DSM Resource Plan. Heritage Gas Limited is an intervenor, and the agreement addresses issues raised by Heritage Gas. The Public Utilities Act is referenced as the legal basis.

1 Request IR-24:

AI summary This document outlines a regulatory proceeding under Request IR-24, involving EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., focusing on Demand Side Management (DSM) programs. Key entities include EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc., with DSM as a central program.

Form A - Information Requests M09096 Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board In the Matter of: The Public Utilities Act - and - In the Matter of: An Application by EfficiencyOne (E1) to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board for Approval of...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board issued Information Requests (M09096) to EfficiencyOne (E1) under the Public Utilities Act, seeking details on their supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. Responses were due by May 13, 2019, with Ecology Action Centre requesting information on energy efficiency and conservation activities.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-72 May 13, 2019 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Offi...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submits responses to information requests related to its application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) and the 2020–2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The proceeding involves multiple stakeholders, including regulatory staff, advocates, and industry groups.

Request for electronic-only filing EfficiencyOne requests permission to file the following Attachments to IR Responses in electronic format only, having regard to the nature of these documents which are in the format of Excel spreadsheets:...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests permission to file multiple Excel spreadsheet attachments electronically, listing specific documents related to various IR responses, including EAC, IG, SBA, and Synapse submissions.

Request to file Board-Only Confidential Response EfficiencyOne requests Board Only Confidential treatment of the following IR Response which contains commercially sensitive information: • NSUARB Pronko IR-09 – Attachment 1 I trust you will...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests Board-Only Confidential treatment for a response containing commercially sensitive information, referencing NSUARB Pronko IR-09 – Attachment 1. The response will be delivered as six hard copies to the Board office. The Breton Law Group's James R. Gogan is the signatory, with a carbon copy to M09096 Participants.

May 13, 2019 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: DSM 2020-2020 Resource Plan and Supply Agreement Information...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) submitted responses to information requests (IRs) from multiple stakeholders, including the Affordable Energy Coalition, Consumer Advocate, and others, regarding the DSM 2020-2020 Resource Plan and Supply Agreement. The matter is referenced as M09096.

- 5. No Designated Confidential Information furnished by NSPI shall be given or communicated to persons other than the Designated Recipients. For greater certainty, no Designated Confidential Information shall be provided to the clients of...

AI summary The text outlines confidentiality rules for Designated Confidential Information in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. NSPI restricts access to such information, allowing review only at its head office and limiting disclosure to Designated Recipients. Notes taken during review must remain confidential, and legal documents must reference confidential information via non-disclosing identifiers. The Board may use such information in deliberations but avoid reproducing it in decisions unless ruled otherwise.

ally identified as such. In addition, Designated Parties will not object to the Board sitting in Camera to hear such evidence if requested by NSPI. - 9. Should any appeal or challenge to the Board's decision in this proceeding be taken, an...

AI summary The document outlines procedures for handling confidential information in regulatory proceedings, including returning such information after a final decision, exceptions for legal counsel, and restrictions on using confidential data solely in NSPI-related regulatory matters. It also addresses in-camera hearings and confidentiality during appeals.

June 4, 2019 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M09096 - EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of Supp...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) requests an extension of its rebuttal evidence deadline from June 4 to June 6, 2019, citing discussions with Board Counsel. EfficiencyOne supports the extension. The request relates to the approval of a supply agreement and a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-72 June 4, 2019 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Offi...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests an extension to file rebuttal evidence in M09096, supported by Nova Scotia Power, referencing the March 1, 2019 Board Hearing Order. The application involves a supply agreement with NS Power and approval of the 2020-2022 DSM Plan.

[email protected] Brian Curry Senior Regulatory Counsel Nova Scotia Power Inc. PO Box 910 Halifax, NS B3J 2W5 Dear Mr. Gogan and Mr. Curry: M09096 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application for Approval of Supply Agreement for Electricity Effic...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and EfficiencyOne (E1) requested an extension for rebuttal evidence in their application for approval of a supply agreement and DSM Resource Plan. The Board approved adjusted timelines, setting rebuttal evidence and settlement agreement deadlines for June 6 and opening statements for June 7.

CONSENSUS AGREEMENT WITH NOVA SCOTIA POWER The Consensus Agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power address the issues set out in the Final Issues List issued by the Board, with the exception of the Heritage Gas issue, (to be ad...

AI summary A Consensus Agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power (NSP) addresses issues from the Board's Final Issues List, excluding the Heritage Gas issue. The agreement outlines positions on regulatory matters, with Heritage Gas to be addressed separately.

Issue 3 – Status of 2016-2018 Verification and Evaluation Recommendations The Parties confirm no opposition to the status of 2016-2018 verification and evaluation recommendations as reported by EfficiencyOne in the Annual Progress Report;

AI summary The Parties confirm no opposition to the status of 2016-2018 verification and evaluation recommendations as reported by EfficiencyOne in the Annual Progress Report. The report's findings are accepted without dispute.

THE BRETON LAW GROUP James R. Gogan cc. M09096 Participants

AI summary The Breton Law Group, represented by James R. Gogan, is involved in a regulatory proceeding with participants referenced under matter number M09096. The document cites a board order (M09084) from the context, though the text itself only explicitly mentions M09096.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-72 June 6, 2019 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs Offi...

AI summary EfficiencyOne submits information to the Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board regarding its application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power (NS Power), establishment of a final agreement, and approval of a 2020–2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan ahead of a June 10, 2019 hearing.

Counsel James R. Gogan, The Breton Law Group Christine E. Murray, The Breton Law Group

AI summary The counsel for the proceeding includes James R. Gogan and Christine E. Murray from The Breton Law Group, indicating their involvement as legal representatives in the regulatory process.

Witnesses EfficiencyOne Management Panel: Stephen MacDonald, CEO, EfficiencyOne Gina Thompson, Director of Finance & Regulatory Affairs, EfficiencyOne Sarah Chiasson, Director of Services, EfficiencyOne Ryan Kelly, Regulatory Technical Lea...

AI summary The section lists EfficiencyOne's witnesses for a regulatory proceeding, including their roles such as CEO, Director of Finance & Regulatory Affairs, and Regulatory Technical Lead. No claims or arguments are explicitly stated in the text.

Bio for DSM 2020 – 2022 Plan Hearing at NSUARB – June 10, 2019 I have a Bachelor of Science degree, with a major in Environmental Economics and Policy, from the University of Guelph. I have a Masters in Environment, Culture and Society fro...

AI summary Kate, Manager of Regulatory Affairs at EfficiencyOne, provided her background in energy policy and management. She has over ten years of experience in the energy industry, including roles at Conserve Nova Scotia and the Environmental Coalition of Prince Edward Island. She has not previously testified before the NSUARB.

Ryan Kelly, P. Eng. Bio for DSM 2020-2022 Plan Hearing at NSUARB – June 10, 2019 I am a registered Professional Engineer, with a Bachelor of Engineering from Dalhousie University. I am a Regulatory Technical Lead at EfficiencyOne and have...

AI summary Ryan Kelly, a Professional Engineer at EfficiencyOne, provides technical support for regulatory and programs departments. He has managed energy efficiency programs since 2011 and has expertise in energy modelling and carbon accounting. He has not testified before the NSUARB previously.

Delivered by E-mail Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 3rd Floor 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692 Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Friis: Re: M09096 - EfficiencyOne ("E1") Application...

AI summary The Industrial Group submits comments on EfficiencyOne's application for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. under the DSM 2020-2022 program, following review of responses to undertakings. This follows counsel's Opening Statement in matter M09096.

mony of Philip Mosenthal, p.20, lines 1-4. Evidence of Alice Napolean. Submitted May 28, 2019 to NSUARB hearing: M09096. Page 28, lines 8-10. Direct Testimony of Philip Mosenthal, p. 18 lines 13-14.

AI summary The text references evidence and testimony submitted in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, including statements from Philip Mosenthal and Alice Napolean, linked to matter number M09096. The submissions pertain to a hearing before the NSUARB.

1 3. INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN 2 If the NSUARB approves the Consensus Agreement as filed, then it will not be necessary to make 3 a determination as to whether the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) ought to have informed the 4 development...

AI summary EfficiencyOne emphasizes the importance of Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) in guiding Demand Side Management (DSM) planning, arguing that recent IRP results should inform future DSM investments. Despite stakeholder concerns about the 2014 IRP's age, EfficiencyOne supports a Consensus Agreement with a lower DSM investment level based on IRP outcomes, while maintaining that IRPs remain foundational for utility planning. The NSUARB's role in approving the Consensus Agreement is noted, with a reference to Board Order M09096.

1 5. HERITAGE GAS - 2 In the course of these proceedings, Heritage Gas raised concerns about the proposed New - 3 Construction service under the Custom Incentives Program related to electric heat pumps and - 4 associated measures in multi-...

AI summary Heritage Gas raised concerns about the New Construction service under the Custom Incentives Program related to electric heat pumps in multi-unit residential buildings with available natural gas. EfficiencyOne and Heritage Gas agreed to a collaborative study, with NSUARB involvement if disagreements arise. EfficiencyOne argues this approach will clarify the program's impact in this market.

July 11, 2019 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: M09096 – Approval of Supply Agreement for Electricity Effic...

AI summary NS Power responds to closing submissions in M09096 regarding approval of an electricity efficiency agreement and a 2020-2022 DSM plan. The reply focuses on key issues rather than all raised points, relying on prior submissions. Multiple intervenors, including EfficiencyOne and the Consumer Advocate, participated in the proceeding.

f this HST money ... because after all, that was collected from customers as a DSM charge. And will ... so will it be allocated back to customers through the FAM differently than a regular FAM charge? MR. LANDRIGAN: Yeah, yes, it would. So...

AI summary The discussion centers on allocating an HST refund collected via DSM charges through the FAM. Mr. Landrigan explains past practices of allocating non-FAM funds to FAM based on DSM profiles and stakeholder input, while Mr. Outhouse frames this as a pilot project for future DSM funding through FAM.

3.0 ISSUES

AI summary The section titled '3.0 ISSUES' is introduced, though no specific issues or content are detailed in the provided text. The context includes known acronyms and entities relevant to the regulatory proceeding.

not be restricted. Clauses 4, 5 and 6 of Appendix A of the Settlement Agreement deal with this issue and are contrary to NS Power's request. This was further elaborated upon in HGL's Reply Submission: ... As Heritage Gas had specifically r...

AI summary HGL argues that NS Power's request contradicts clauses 4-6 of the Settlement Agreement, which address concerns about the Custom Incentive Program's effects on electric heat pumps in multi-unit buildings. The Board agrees with HGL, affirming the Settlement Agreement's terms over NS Power's conflicting request.

In the event DSMAG agreement on final revised terms of reference cannot be achieved by June 30, 2020, the finalization ofthe revised terms ofreference shall be referred to the UARB for determination. - 8. The existing HomeWarming program f...

AI summary The document outlines agreements between EfficiencyOne (E1) and NS Power regarding the HomeWarming program's administration from 2020-2022, terms of reference for DSMAG, and non-opposition to 2018 DSM evaluation and verification reports. Parties agree not to file rebuttal evidence but reserve rights to challenge evidence in future proceedings.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS EffidencyOne ("El") Is the Franchise Holder In accordance with the Public UtilitiesAM; AND WHEREAS EldeneyGrie has filed an application with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, in accordance with the prov...

AI summary A settlement agreement is reached between EfficiencyOne (E1) and Heritage Gas Limited (HGL) regarding the approval of a Supply Agreement and DSM Resource Plan (2020-2022) by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power). The agreement resolves issues raised by HGL in the proceeding under the Public Utilities Act (PUA), with parties reserving rights to amend positions based on further evidence.

Allocation of Program Costs - Nova Scotia Power was directed by the NSUARB in its Order dated October 7, 2015, Matter - M07151, to file its proposed accounting treatment and cost recovery for the 2015 DSM - programs and 2016-18 DSM program...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power followed NSUARB's 2015 order (M07151) to allocate DSM program costs annually, adjusting variances during GRA. EfficiencyOne provided spending data aligned with NS Power's proposals, with cost allocation figures from 2019 reflecting 100% of program costs by rate class. NS Power's 2020-2022 allocation process used four steps outlined in Undertaking U-1, approved under M06733.

4 Residential Efficient Product Rebates: Program Description

AI summary The document outlines a residential efficient product rebate program under Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding. It involves the NSUARB and DSMAG, focusing on demand-side management and cost allocation methodologies. The program aims to promote energy efficiency through rebates, aligning with integrated resource planning and total resource cost tests.

Existing Residential: Program Description

AI summary The document outlines the Existing Residential Program under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework, involving Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives. Key entities include the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), with discussions on cost allocation methodologies and program evaluation.

Demand Side Management Advisory Group The DSMAG is a forum to provide strategic or directional advice and stakeholder perspectives on current or emerging DSM issues including, but not limited to, issues identified in NSUARB Orders pertaini...

AI summary The Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) provides strategic advice on DSM issues, including NSUARB Orders. Revised Terms of Reference for DSMAG, aimed at enhancing future DSM applications, will be developed in 2020 with NSUARB collaboration. If consensus is not reached by June 30, 2020, the NSUARB will finalize the terms.

4.1.5 Program Design

AI summary The section outlines Program Design considerations under Nova Scotia's regulatory framework, referencing key acronyms and entities involved in energy management and utility regulation. It highlights the role of organizations like NSUARB and ENS in shaping demand-side management initiatives.

5.1.6 Implementation Strategy

AI summary The section outlines the implementation strategy for demand-side management programs, involving the NSUARB and other regulatory bodies, with references to various acronyms related to energy efficiency and cost allocation methodologies.

5.2 Custom Incentives: Program Description

AI summary Section 5.2 outlines the description of Custom Incentives within a regulatory proceeding, likely detailing program structures, eligibility criteria, or implementation frameworks. Key entities and acronyms related to energy management and regulatory oversight are referenced.

5.2.2 Enhancements in 2020-2022

AI summary The section outlines enhancements implemented between 2020 and 2022, though specific details are not provided in the text. Key acronyms related to energy management, regulatory bodies, and programs are listed for reference.

5.3.5 Program Design

AI summary The section discusses Program Design within the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, referencing key acronyms and entities involved in energy management and utility regulation. It highlights DSM, TRC, and other related terms, emphasizing cost allocation and evaluation methodologies.

Demand Side Management Advisory Group The DSMAG Advisory Group is a forum to provide strategic or directional advice and stakeholder perspectives on current or emerging DSM issues including, but not limited to, issues identified in NSUARB...

AI summary The Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) provides strategic advice on DSM issues, including those from NSUARB orders. Revised terms of reference for DSMAG, aimed at enhancing future DSM applications, will be developed by 2020. If consensus is not reached by June 30, 2020, the NSUARB will determine the terms.

therein, the defaulting Party shall not be in breach or violation if it: (a) commences and diligently and continuously carries out the correction of the breach or violation within the specified time; (b) provides to the non-defaulting Part...

AI summary The section outlines conditions for a defaulting party to avoid breach, requiring corrective action, a plan submission, and compliance. It also details the non-defaulting party's right to apply for termination with the UARB. Notification procedures for the agreement are specified, including addresses, delivery methods, and receipt presumptions.

CONSENSUS AGREEMENT WHEREAS EfficiencyOne ("E1") is the Franchise Holder in accordance with the Public Utilities Act ; AND WHEREAS EfficiencyOne has filed an application with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, in accordance with the...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) reached a consensus agreement regarding the approval of the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan and Supply Agreement. Both are co-applicants under the Public Utilities Act, having filed evidence and responded to intervenor requests. The agreement includes terms approved by the Parties, with a reservation to amend based on further evidence.

In the event DSMAG agreement on final revised terms of reference cannot be achieved by June 30, 2020, the finalization ofthe revised terms ofreference shall be referred to the UARB for determination. - 8. The existing HomeWarming program f...

AI summary The document outlines terms for DSMAG agreement deadlines, transfers HomeWarming program administration to E1, and confirms non-opposition to 2018 DSM evaluation and verification reports. Parties agree not to file rebuttal evidence but reserve future rights. The Public Utilities Act is referenced, with a cross-reference to matter M09O96.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS EfficiencyOne ("El") Is the Franchise Holder in accordance with the Public Utilities Act; AND WHEREAS EfficiencyOne has filed an application with file Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, in accordance with th...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) seek approval for a Supply Agreement and 2020-2022 DSM Plan. Heritage Gas Limited intervenes, and parties agree on matters raised by the intervenor. The agreement is subject to further evidence.

Multi Unit Residential Buildings Study Report In the course of the proceedings in this matter, EfficiencyOne and Heritage Gas entered into a Settlement Agreement, which was filed with the Board on June 6, 2019. In its decision dated August...

AI summary EfficiencyOne and Heritage Gas reached a Settlement Agreement approved by the Board in August 2019. The Board incorporated the agreement into an Order on September 16, 2019, requiring a study report on Multi-unit Residential Buildings by October 15, 2019.

2. Geographical Coverage – Areas Where Natural Gas is Available Natural gas service is available to a building where: 1. A service line can be installed to the building from a natural gas main located in front of the property or from a nea...

AI summary Natural gas service availability criteria include installable service lines or economic feasibility determined by the Nova Scotia Utility And Review Board. EfficiencyOne coordinates with Heritage Gas to assess gas availability for MURBs, with Heritage Gas providing a 15-day response to developers.

Building Modeling Assumptions Table The table below highlights additional key inputs of our building energy modeling.

AI summary The document presents a table outlining key inputs for building energy modeling, though specific details are not provided in the excerpt. It is part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia related to energy efficiency and building standards.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 [email protected] axa Office 3rd Floor, 1601 LowerWater Street Halifax, Nova Scotia 83J 3P6 1 855 442-4448 (toll-free) 902 424-4448 t...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. Stakeholders must review findings from a multi-unit residential building study by November 18, 2019. The proceeding involves a panel including Peter W. Gurnham, Q.C., and Regulatory Affairs Officer Doreen Friis.

Terms of Reference – EfficiencyOne Performance Alignment Study DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

AI summary A draft terms of reference document for a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia concerning an EfficiencyOne Performance Alignment Study. The document is marked as a draft for discussion only and outlines the scope of the study.

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailingaddress PO Box 1692, Unit \ M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) a.ca Office 3rd Floor, 1601 LowerWater Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B313P6 1 855 442-4...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board acknowledges receipt of EfficiencyOne's Terms of Reference for a study on historic under-spending in Demand Side Management (DSM) budgets and energy savings targets. The Board questions whether the study addresses concerns about potential upward bias in cost estimates, factors causing past over-estimation, and if those factors persist. The matter involves a 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan and an agreement between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc.

November 15, 2019 Ms. Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Dear Ms. Friis: RE: M09096 – In the Matter of an Application by EfficiencyOne (E1) to the Nova Scot...

AI summary Heritage Gas Limited supports EfficiencyOne's (E1) application for approval of a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power), a final agreement, and a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) plan. No other responses were received, and Heritage Gas requests the Board approve E1's filing.

iled no later than November 4, 2019. The Small Business Advocate was the only stakeholder filing comments in response to the VRF Program Review report, indicating it had no concerns with the findings. EfficiencyOne has no reply comments. E...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate submitted comments with no concerns regarding the VRF Program Review report. EfficiencyOne requested approval of their agreement with Heritage Gas, citing their October 15, 2019 filing. The Breton Law Group submitted the document, with six hard copies filed. No other stakeholders provided reply comments.

Schedule B (Page 2 of 2)

AI summary Schedule B (Page 2 of 2) from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, involving Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI). The document references Demand Side Management (DSM) and Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities (EECA), highlighting regulatory considerations related to energy programs and organizational roles.

Permitted Disclosures - 10 6. The Recipient shall be permitted to disclose relevant aspects of the Confidential 11 Information to its employees and professional advisors to the extent that such 12 disclosure is reasonably necessary for the...

AI summary The Recipient may disclose Confidential Information to employees and advisors if necessary for their duties, requiring prior notification and signed undertakings. Exceptions include legal obligations, court orders, or regulatory disclosures, with requirements to notify the Disclosing Party, seek protective orders, and remove commercially sensitive data when possible.

8.6 Demand Side Management Advisory Group 2 3 The DSMAG is a fon1m to provide strategic or directional advice and stakeholder 4 perspectives on current or emerging DSM issues including, but not llmited to, issues , 5 identified in NSUARB O...

AI summary The DSMAG provides strategic advice on DSM issues, with revised terms of reference planned for 2020 to enhance future DSM applications. If consensus isn't reached by June 30, 2020, the NSUARB will determine the terms.

[email protected] Michael Johnston Director – Regulatory & Government Affairs Heritage Gas Limited Park Place 1, 200 238 Brownlow Avenue Dartmouth, NS B3B 1Y2 Dear Mr. Gogan and Mr. Johnston: M09096 – EfficiencyOne (E1) Application...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and a 2020–2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan. Heritage Gas Limited raised concerns about E1's incentives, leading to a Settlement Agreement and a Dunsky Energy Consulting study. The Board accepted the study, with E1 and Heritage Gas agreeing to implement its recommendations.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: (902) 563-5920 E-Mail: [email protected] File No. 41736-113 March 26, 2020 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Doreen Friis, Regulatory Affairs O...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks a three-week extension to file its Performance Alignment Study report by April 21, 2020, due to existing circumstances. The report, mandated by the Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board following its September 2019 order, assesses historic underspending and overspending trends in Demand Side Management (DSM) budgets and energy savings targets. KPMG conducted the study, and the Breton Law Group represents EfficiencyOne in the proceeding.

4.1 Enhancements to Documentation EfficiencyOne employs a bottom-up measure level modelling approach for the development of three-year DSM Plans. A key activity of this approach is the development of the measure level input data used for m...

AI summary EfficiencyOne uses a bottom-up approach for DSM Plans, agreeing with KPMG that documentation of rationale for measure-level assumptions could be improved. They note implementation depends on factors like measure complexity and that enhanced documentation may not improve accuracy. Costs must be justified by value to ratepayers.

2.2 Timeline of EfficiencyOne DSM planning The following chart provides an overview of the timeline of EfficiencyOne's DSM Resource Plan milestones since 2012. 7 Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit Organization (NPO) Information Return, Can...

AI summary This section outlines the timeline of EfficiencyOne's Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan milestones since 2012, referencing a chart and images depicting key planning stages. The text includes a citation to a Canadian Revenue Agency document but lacks detailed arguments or procedural specifics.

s based on information and assumptions at an effective date. With the passage of time, actual experience, and new/updated market and measure information may impact the precision of the cost estimates. We did see the Plans filed with the NS...

AI summary The response to NSUARB Question 1 is based on reviewed documentation from 2015 onward and discussions with EfficiencyOne, noting that actual experience and new information may affect the precision of cost estimates over time.

Use of Modelling in 2016-2018 and 2020-2022 We identified that modelling was completed to inform the costs and energy savings of the 2016-2018 and 2020-2022 Plans. For the 2016-2018 Plan, we saw the input table that was used. For the 2020-

AI summary The document discusses the use of modelling to inform the costs and energy savings of the 2016-2018 and 2020-2022 Plans. Input tables were used for the 2016-2018 Plan, while the 2020-2022 Plan is referenced with an image.

7 2013-2015 DSM Resource Plan – Approach and results

AI summary The 2013-2015 DSM Resource Plan outlines Nova Scotia Power's approach and results for demand-side management initiatives. The plan focuses on energy efficiency programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and regulatory oversight by the NSUARB.

2013 Results The analysis of 2013 results is based primarily on a review of the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Application submitted to the NSUARB. The following table outlines a summary of the results against the Plan as filed for 2013. We noted...

AI summary The 2013 results analysis focuses on the 2015 DSM Resource Plan Application to NSUARB, noting no change in investment levels post-mid-course adjustment. Key data is summarized in a table referencing the 2013-2015 DSM Plan revised on April 18, 2012.

Appendix A Scope and approach

AI summary The appendix outlines the scope and approach of the regulatory proceeding, involving entities such as Nova Scotia Power Inc. and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. Key focus areas include demand-side management programs, cost recovery mechanisms, and efficiency initiatives.

Overview of 2015 DSM Resource Plan 2015 was the transition year from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) Franchise; therefore, the 2015 DSM Resource Plan was designed as a Continuation Plan that did not take...

AI summary The 2015 DSM Resource Plan served as a continuation plan during the transition from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) Franchise. It operated under a $35 million legislative cap, plus a $4 million 2013 surplus, totaling $39 million. The plan relied on historical data and market research, continuing 2013–2014 activities without modeling.

Approach by EfficiencyOne As the 2015 DSM Resource Plan was a Continuation Plan, it was not modelled with assistance by a third-party and, as such, did not require the model inputs of incentive cost and admin cost.

AI summary EfficiencyOne explains that the 2015 DSM Resource Plan, being a Continuation Plan, was not modeled with third-party assistance, thus not requiring inputs for incentive and administrative costs.

2020-2022 admin costs – model input approach by EfficiencyOne EfficiencyOne stated that the methodology applied to estimate and allocate the admin cost in 2020- 2022 DSM Resource Plan was consistent with that which was followed in the 2016...

AI summary EfficiencyOne claims the 2020-2022 admin cost methodology for DSM aligns with the 2016-2018 plan but applies at a program component level rather than NSUARB program level. Admin costs are derived from 2017 audited CAM output, adjusted by direct incentive costs, with differences noted between the two DSM Resource Plans.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: 902-563-5920 Email[: [email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) File No. 41736-133 June 30, 2020 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention: Cryst...

AI summary EfficiencyOne revised the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) Terms of Reference per the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) directive in matter M09096. The revision involved stakeholder consultations and adherence to the Consensus Agreement, aiming to enhance future DSM Plan applications through collaborative processes and stakeholder engagement.

Deliverables: To achieve this objective, the DSMAG shall complete the following tasks and deliverables: - Establish a framework that will facilitate future DSM Plan development by: - o Adopting a recommended format for joint filing of DSM...

AI summary The DSMAG is tasked with establishing frameworks for DSM Plan development, including updating avoided costs, evaluating reports, and setting affordability criteria under the PUA. E1 must maintain an 18-month calendar for DSMAG timelines. The process aims to streamline regulatory proceedings by resolving disputes pre-submission to the NSUARB, reducing burdens for all Members and ratepayers.

Narrowing Issues in Dispute To the extent possible, the Members shall attempt to narrow issues in dispute, and resolve disagreements. With respect to issues arising in proceedings that are to be determined by the NSUARB, E1 may, in its sol...

AI summary The NSUARB and E1 outline a structured process for narrowing disputes among Members, involving DSMAG meetings, consensus-building, and chart preparation. If consensus fails, issues are escalated to the NSUARB for determination, ensuring efficient resolution of disagreements.

Technical Sessions Technical Sessions shall be held for any DSM technical matter that E1 intends to bring before the NSUARB for determination, including, but not limited to, an application for a DSM Plan. The purpose of each Technical Sess...

AI summary Technical Sessions are held for DSM matters before the NSUARB, aiming to address key issues through consensus to reduce regulatory costs. E1 organizes these sessions, preparing agendas and materials for Members and their consultants. The process facilitates without prejudice exchanges to streamline proceedings.

Schedule B (Page 1

AI summary The document is Schedule B, Page 1 of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.

December 4, 2020 Via Email Ms. Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood, Re: M09096 – EfficiencyOne and NSPI - 2020-22 DSM...

AI summary The email references the submission of a First Amending Agreement between Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) and EfficiencyOne, dated December 1, 2020, following the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's decision letter dated November 30, 2020, regarding matter M09096.

James R. Gogan Direct Dial: 902-563-5920 Email[: [email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) File No. 41736-133 September 20, 2021 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3S3 Attention:...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) directed EfficiencyOne to revise the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) Terms of Reference as part of matter M09096. EfficiencyOne conducted a review and submitted revised terms on June 30, 2020, including a review provision.

Terms of Reference

AI summary The Terms of Reference outline the scope of a regulatory proceeding, focusing on Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives. No specific entities, legislation, or arguments are detailed in the provided text.

Deliverables: To achieve this objective, the DSMAG shall complete the following tasks and deliverables: - Establish a framework that will facilitate future DSM Plan development by: - o Adopting a recommended format for joint filing of DSM...

AI summary The DSMAG is tasked with developing a framework for DSM Plan creation, including updating avoided costs, evaluating reports, affordability criteria, and timelines. It also involves reviewing long-term planning, rate impact methodologies, and payback periods. E1 must maintain an 18-month calendar for DSMAG activities, with stakeholder input aimed at resolving disputes pre-regulatory proceedings.

Facilitate a Reduction in and Ease the Burden of Regulatory Proceedings Members recognize and acknowledge that an ancillary benefit and outcome of the DSMAG, achieved through the two above-noted objectives, is the streamlining of regulator...

AI summary The DSMAG aims to streamline regulatory proceedings by fostering early collaboration among members to narrow issues before the NSUARB, reducing burdens and improving efficiency. This approach benefits ratepayers through more efficient processes and reduced procedural complexity.

Deliverables: To achieve this outcome and benefit, the DSMAG shall develop and adopt a process whereby: - 1. E1 shall identify, in a timely manner, proposed applications, requests or questions for determination it intends to file with the...

AI summary The DSMAG outlines a process for E1 to identify applications for NSUARB review, engage stakeholders through prehearing meetings, and ensure timely feedback to reduce contested matters. Submissions during this process are confidential but must align with future regulatory positions.

Member-Initiated Agenda Items Any Member may request that the Chair include an Agenda item for a DSMAG meeting. Where such a request is made, the Member shall provide a written summary of the proposed Agenda item to the Chair at least two...

AI summary The document outlines the process for members to propose agenda items to the DSMAG, requiring advance submission of summaries and supporting materials, followed by discussion and potential action during meetings. Members must provide details two weeks in advance, with materials uploaded three business days prior to meetings.

Narrowing Issues in Dispute To the extent possible, the Members shall attempt to narrow issues in dispute, and resolve disagreements. With respect to issues arising in proceedings that are to be determined by the NSUARB, E1 may, in its sol...

AI summary The NSUARB outlines a structured process for narrowing disputes among Members, involving the DSMAG. The Chair prepares a chart detailing disputed issues, facilitates discussions, and escalates unresolved matters to the NSUARB if consensus cannot be reached.

Paper Process Should the Chair of the DSMAG determine that a matter may be better dealt with by way of written exchanges among the Members rather than by attendance at a DSMAG Meeting or Technical Session, the Chair will communicate this i...

AI summary The DSMAG Chair may opt for a paper process to address matters via written exchanges instead of meetings, setting timelines for responses and resolution. This does not prevent members from later requesting in-person discussions. The process ensures procedural flexibility while preserving rights to raise issues in meetings.

Technical Sessions Technical Sessions shall be held for any DSM technical matter that E1 intends to bring before the NSUARB for determination, including, but not limited to, an application for a DSM Plan. The purpose of each Technical Sess...

AI summary Technical Sessions are held for DSM matters before the NSUARB, aiming to facilitate consensus and reduce regulatory costs. E1 is responsible for organizing sessions and providing materials for review.

Review and Amendment of these Terms of Reference The DSMAG will review these Terms of Reference annually. Any proposed change to these Terms of Reference shall be provided in writing to the existing Members and be agreed upon in writing by...

AI summary The DSMAG is required to annually review and amend the Terms of Reference, with any proposed changes needing written approval from a majority of at least two-thirds of its members. The process ensures structured governance for modifying these reference terms.

Terms of Reference

AI summary The Terms of Reference outline the scope and objectives of the regulatory proceeding, though no specific content or arguments are detailed in the provided text. The acronym DSM (Demand Side Management) is noted as relevant.

Advisory Group The DSM Advisory Group, (the "DSMAG"), is the current advisory group made up of key stakeholders in Nova Scotia's electricity and energy sectors which provides input in the design and development of DSM Plans.

AI summary The DSM Advisory Group (DSMAG) consists of key stakeholders in Nova Scotia's electricity and energy sectors, providing input on the design and development of Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans. The group includes organizations such as Nova Scotia Power Incorporated and Efficiency Nova Scotia.

Deliverables: To achieve this objective, the DSMAG shall complete the following tasks and deliverables: - Establish a framework that will facilitate future DSM Plan development by: - o Adopting a recommended format for joint filing of DSM...

AI summary The DSMAG is tasked with establishing a framework for DSM Plan development, including updating avoided costs, evaluating reports, setting affordability criteria under the PUA, and managing timelines. E1 must maintain an 18-month calendar for DSMAG activities. Stakeholders may present positions without prejudice, aiming to resolve issues pre-regulatory proceedings.

Facilitate a Reduction in and Ease the Burden of Regulatory Proceedings Members recognize and acknowledge that an ancillary benefit and outcome of the DSMAG, achieved through the two above-noted objectives, is the streamlining of regulator...

AI summary Members acknowledge that the DSMAG streamlines regulatory proceedings by reducing burdens through early collaboration with E1, aiming to narrow issues for NSUARB adjudication and benefit ratepayers.

Deliverables: To achieve this outcome and benefit, the DSMAG shall develop and adopt a process whereby: - 1. E1 shall identify, in a timely manner, proposed applications, requests or questions for determination it intends to file with the...

AI summary The DSMAG outlines a process for E1 to identify and file applications with the NSUARB, including timelines for stakeholder feedback. E1 may schedule DSMAG meetings or technical sessions, and Members must provide timely feedback to minimize contested regulatory matters. Submissions during the Prehearing Process are confidential but should align with future regulatory positions.

Member-Initiated Agenda Items Any Member may request that the Chair include an Agenda item for a DSMAG meeting. Where such a request is made, the Member shall provide a written summary of the proposed Agenda item to the Chair at least two...

AI summary The process for member-initiated agenda items in DSMAG meetings requires members to submit proposals two weeks in advance, with materials provided three days before the meeting. The Chair reviews and places items on the agenda, and members discuss and decide on actions during the meeting.

Paper Process Should the Chair of the DSMAG determine that a matter may be better dealt with by way of written exchanges among the Members rather than by attendance at a DSMAG Meeting or Technical Session, the Chair will communicate this i...

AI summary The DSMAG Chair may handle matters via written exchanges instead of meetings, setting timelines for responses and resolution. This process doesn't prevent members from raising issues in person.

Technical Sessions Technical Sessions shall be held for any DSM technical matter that E1 intends to bring before the NSUARB for determination, including, but not limited to, an application for a DSM Plan. The purpose of each Technical Sess...

AI summary Technical Sessions are convened by E1 for DSM matters before the NSUARB, aiming to address key issues through consensus-building to reduce regulatory costs. E1 prepares agendas and materials, with technical consultants participating. Sessions facilitate pre-regulatory exchange of positions.