E-12022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis
6 passages
Figure 2: Average Rate Impacts (2011-2039) as a Result of DSM Activities in 2011-2025 - [Figure 3](#page-29-0) illustrates the annual rate effects (difference between the no-DSM scenario and the DSM - scenario for each year), assuming that...
AI summary Figure 2 and Figure 3 analyze average rate impacts from 2011-2039 due to DSM activities, highlighting that annual rate changes are influenced by DSM cost recovery and avoided cost fluctuations. The annual impacts in Figure 3 are clarified as not reflecting actual customer rate changes experienced.
2022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis 2022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis Appendix D: Assumptions This document is intended to provide an overview of the assumptions used in EfficiencyOne's (E1) 2022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA). Gener...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA) uses Synapse's 'snapshot' approach, analyzing 2011-2025 DSM programs in DSM and no-DSM scenarios. It includes multiple rate classes beyond Synapse's recommendations, excluding classes where E1 does not offer programs.
Methodology for determination of changes in NS Power's base cost rates as a result of DSM-induced changes in class usage and total system costs November 27, 2020
AI summary The document outlines a methodology to assess how Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives impact NS Power's base cost rates by analyzing changes in class usage and total system costs. It emphasizes regulatory considerations for adjusting rates based on DSM-induced shifts in energy consumption patterns.
Overview of Spreadsheet Calculations
AI summary The document provides an overview of spreadsheet calculations used in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, likely related to energy efficiency programs, cost studies, and demand-side management initiatives. Key entities include regulatory bodies, efficiency programs, and technical acronyms relevant to electricity generation and distribution.
Changes in total Revenue Requirement
AI summary Analysis of changes in total revenue requirement, focusing on cost of service studies (COSS) and regulated business investment applications (RBIA). Key considerations include demand-side management (DSM), efficiency programs, and regulatory proceedings impacting Nova Scotia's energy sector.
"NSPI Inputs into RBIA" tab "NSPI Inputs into RBIA" provides pricing inputs requested by E1. It includes the following annual class data in years 201-2035 broken out by "With DSM" and "No DSM" scenarios: - Forecast Unit Revenues Before DSM...
AI summary NSPI provides pricing inputs for the RBIA, including annual data from 2021-2035 under 'With DSM' and 'No DSM' scenarios. Data includes revenues, program charges, sales forecasts, demand, and customer counts. Filed 31 October 2022.
88527Reply Comments
4 passages
4. FUTURE RBIA REPORTING Both Synapse and the CA acknowledged E1's stated intention to file the next historical RBIA in conjunction with future DSM Plans. Synapse commented, "It is important to note that this is the last historical R&BIA t...
AI summary Synapse and the Consumer Advocate (CA) acknowledge EfficiencyOne's (E1) plan to file future historical RBIA reports only with new DSM Plans, reducing annual filings. Synapse emphasizes this is the last historical report for several years, while the CA supports less frequent reporting, citing limited impact on program design. E1 endorses this approach and seeks stakeholder input on RBIA reporting frameworks.
5. AVOIDED COSTS - Synapse asserted that, "a "no DSM" case is necessary for accurate R&BIA modeling. NSPI is in the - process of updating the 2020 IRP to reflect the impacts of recently adopted legislation and other - changes. As part of t...
AI summary Synapse argues a 'no DSM' case is essential for accurate R&BIA modeling, requesting NSPI updates to the 2020 IRP and DSMAG involvement. NS Power states it will analyze DSM scenarios and calculate avoided costs post-Evergreen IRP, not within its scope. E1 supports Synapse's request for a 'no-DSM' case and DSMAG engagement.
7. MODELING OF DEMAND RESPONSE RESOURCES - Synapse commented, "While we did not find specific issues based on this review, we are not - aware of other jurisdictions addressing demand response in an R&BIA or of any best practices in - that...
AI summary Synapse noted a lack of best practices for incorporating demand response into R&BIA, urging E1 to monitor methodologies. E1 collaborated with Elenchus to include demand response in the 2023-2025 DSM Plan and plans to refine approaches in future reports.
9. CLOSING - E1 appreciates the ongoing stakeholder engagement on the RBIA and thanks DSMAG members - for the opportunity to respond to these comments.
AI summary E1 appreciates ongoing stakeholder engagement on the RBIA and thanks DSMAG members for their input.