HomeHome Energy ReportM08888Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Home Energy Report" in M08888

Matter: E-ENS-G-18 - EfficiencyOne - Evaluation of DSM Programs - Application to allow inclusion of Non-Energy BenefitsEfficiencyOne - Application for approval of the use of Non-Energy Benefits within Cost-Effectiveness Testing
5 passages 1 document

Home Energy Report across all matters →

E-10-(i)Book of Authorities 5 passages
3.1 Evaluation Report of 2014 DSM Programs (Econoler) p. p. 66
e 2014 evaluation for those programs involved validating ENSC's tracked savings and ensuring that the evaluation parameters corresponded to those established in previous full-scale impact evaluations. - [30] The 2014 DSM portfolio included...

AI summary The 2014 DSM program evaluation by Econoler validated ENSC's savings, achieving 151.9 GWh energy savings and 27.1 MW peak demand reductions. The evaluation included 16 programs and 71 recommendations, with concerns raised about HER program data confidentiality and methodology. E1 claimed savings exceeded targets by 10.2%.

3.2 Verification Report of 2014 DSM Programs (Peach) p. p. 68
Exchange; and Codes and Standards. [41] There are 20 recommendations identified in the Peach verification report. In the previous report on the 2013 DSM portfolio, 30 recommendations were presented. [42] The 2014 verification review determ...

AI summary The 2014 DSM program verification report by Peach identified 20 recommendations, noting that all but one evaluation (the HER program) met industry standards. The HER program's evaluation was criticized for lacking independence due to NSPI providing customer data to the program vendor instead of an independent evaluator, violating industry protocols emphasized by SEE Action and the Universal Methods Protocol.

Q. Are you satisfied with the status of the 2013 verification and evaluation recommendations? p. p. 72
Q. Are you satisfied with the status of the 2013 verification and evaluation recommendations? A. Yes. In general, from year to year Econoler has been responsive to all recommendations in the Savings Verification study, either making small...

AI summary The respondent confirms satisfaction with the 2013 verification recommendations, noting Econoler and E1's responsiveness. The Board accepts this but directs E1 to update on 2014 recommendations and removes Home Energy Report savings from 2014 totals due to concerns. The Home Energy Report is excluded from the 2016-2018 DSM portfolio.

4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS p. pp. 96-97
4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS [129] The Board received 37 letters of comment from various persons, who wrote individually or on behalf of organizations. With only two exceptions, all were supportive of E1 and maintaining the a...

AI summary The Board received 37 letters, mostly supporting E1's DSM plan, citing environmental, economic, and low-income benefits. Public speakers emphasized maintaining DSM programs and energy efficiency culture. One letter critiqued Dr. Peach's evidence, while concerns about industry capacity if spending decreases were raised.

VI CUSTOMER USAGE DATA p. pp. 149-152
VI CUSTOMER USAGE DATA

AI summary The section 'VI CUSTOMER USAGE DATA' outlines the context of a regulatory proceeding, including relevant acronyms and entities, but the provided text does not contain specific arguments or data.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →