E-22024 DSM Programs Evaluation Reports
61 passages
2.1.4 Effective Useful Life Review As part of the DSM MA update in 2024, the Evaluator reviewed the EUL values for existing and new measures to ensure they were valid and revised them where appropriate. The EUL update was based on a litera...
AI summary The 2024 DSM MA update reviewed and revised EUL values for energy measures using technical references from other jurisdictions. Adjusted EUL calculations considered baseline evolution and lifetime savings, applied to programs like Affordable Single-family Homes and Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency Project, with updated metrics for multifamily housing heat pumps.
Table 6: Comparison of 2024 Evaluated and Tracked Peak Demand Savings at the Generator a Program Component Tracked Results Evaluated Results Difference DSM Program Annual Gross Savings (MW) Annual Net Savings (MW) Available Capacity (MW) A...
AI summary Table 6 compares the evaluated and tracked peak demand savings at the generator for various programs in 2024. It shows results for residential, BNI, and demand response programs, highlighting differences in net savings and available capacity, along with net realization rates for each component.
Affordable Single-family Homes - › In 2024, 1,210 homes participated in Affordable Single-family Homes and 1,193 of them generated electrical energy savings. - › The net electrical energy and peak demand savings determined by the Evaluator...
AI summary In 2024, 1,210 homes participated in Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH), with 1,193 achieving electrical energy savings. However, net savings were 21% and 3% lower than initial estimates due to revised adjustment ratios from a billing analysis using HOT2000 for Home Energy Assessments (HEA).
Table 9: 2024 Evaluated GHG Emission Reductions DSM Program Program Component Gross Annual Avoided GHG Emissions in CO2 eq Tonnes Net Annual Avoided GHG Emissions in CO2 eq Tonnes Residential Efficient Appliance Retirement 1,981 1,117 Prod...
AI summary Table 9 presents evaluated greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions for 2024 under various demand-side management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia. The table includes both gross and net annual avoided emissions in CO2 equivalent tonnes for different program components, such as appliance retirement, product rebates, and energy assessments.
Table 12: Evaluated Net Electrical Energy Savings at the Generator, 2020-2024 Energy Savings (GWh) Energy Savings (%) DSM Program Program Component 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Residential Residential Appliance Retirem...
AI summary Table 12 presents evaluated net electrical energy savings from various DSM programs in Nova Scotia from 2020 to 2024, highlighting contributions from residential, BNI, and overall portfolio programs, with significant energy savings percentages and GWh values reported for each category and year.
Table 13: Evaluated Net Peak Demand Savings at the Generator, 2020-2024 Peak Demand Savings (MW) Peak Demand Savings (%) DSM Program a Program Component 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Residential Residential Efficient Ap...
AI summary Table 13 presents evaluated net peak demand savings from various Demand Side Management (DSM) programs in Nova Scotia from 2020 to 2024. It details savings by program type, including residential and BNI programs, and provides both megawatt (MW) and percentage savings for each year.
5 Process Evaluation Results For the 2024 evaluation, the Evaluator conducted four process evaluations for Affordable Multifamily Housing, Affordable Single-family Homes, Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates, and Custom New Constructi...
AI summary The 2024 evaluation focused on four programs: Affordable Multifamily Housing, Affordable Single-family Homes, Business Energy Rebates – Instant Rebates, and Custom New Construction, assessing their process effectiveness.
Affordable Single-family Homes To collect information on program staff, partner, and participant perspectives, the Evaluator conducted surveys with participants as well as interviews with heat pump contractors, program staff, and delivery...
AI summary The evaluation of the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program involved surveys and interviews with participants, heat pump contractors, program staff, and delivery agents to gather perspectives on program implementation and outcomes.
› Participants see the value of the program. The energy efficient retrofits installed at no cost through Affordable Single-family Homes are perceived by participants to be making their homes more comfortable and warmer in winter and less e...
AI summary Participants in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program report increased home comfort and reduced heating costs from no-cost energy-efficient retrofits, highlighting perceived program value.
› Overall satisfaction with Affordable Single-family Homes is high. Surveyed participants as well as interviewed DAs and heat pump contractors are generally satisfied with Affordable Single-family Homes. Participants consider it easy and w...
AI summary Surveyed participants and interviewed Delivery Agents (DAs) and heat pump contractors report high satisfaction with the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, finding it easy and worthwhile. While suggestions for improvements exist, overall endorsement and recommendation of the program are strong.
› Long wait times cause discontent at various program stages and for various stakeholders. - › Modelled participants are particularly dissatisfied with the wait time between their enrollment in ASFH and the initial home energy assessment....
AI summary Stakeholders report dissatisfaction with prolonged wait times in EfficiencyOne (E1) programs, particularly for Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) enrollments and upgrade approvals. E1 acknowledges the issue, citing staff expansion and training to address backlogs and improve contractor engagement.
› Participants would like more information to be provided about the program steps. Limited participant knowledge about Affordable Single-family Homes can cause participant confusion and frustration during the initial DA/contractor visit, p...
AI summary Participants express frustration due to limited knowledge about Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program steps, leading to confusion during initial Delivery Agent (DA)/contractor visits, especially when considering multiple programs like the Oil to Heat Pump Program (OHPA).
ASFH Findings and Recommendations This subsection presents the key findings and recommendations from the ASFH evaluation in relation to the above objectives. 2024 ASFH-Finding: The energy efficient retrofits installed at no cost through AS...
AI summary Participants in the ASFH program report increased home comfort and heating cost savings, but face long wait times and confusion due to limited program knowledge. E1 acknowledges wait time issues and is expanding staff to address backlogs. Recommendations include tracking wait times and improving participant information.
3.3.4 Affordability Covenant
AI summary The Affordability Covenant section outlines commitments related to ensuring energy programs and initiatives are accessible and affordable for residents and businesses in Nova Scotia, particularly focusing on low-income and multifamily housing.
Alternative Programs Two dropped-out participants and five non-participants stated that they either had taken part in a program other than AMH or had plans to do so in the near future. One dropped-out participant noted that they had not ex...
AI summary Participants and non-participants in the AMH program cited administrative burdens and eligibility issues as barriers to engagement. Some opted for alternative programs like E1 (targeting affordable housing) or CMHC initiatives. Interviewees expressed interest in reapplying to AMH if other programs didn’t conflict. Limited funding sources were reported, with Housing Nova Scotia and CMHC funds mentioned as supports.
6 ASFH Overview This section describes the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program component, follows up on past evaluation recommendations, and provides an overview of participation history.
AI summary This section outlines the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, addresses past evaluation recommendations, and summarizes participation history. It focuses on program oversight and historical engagement data.
6.1 ASFH Description ASFH provides energy efficient retrofits and heat pump installations to income-qualified Nova Scotian owners of both electrically heated and non-electrically heated homes at no cost to participants. The program compone...
AI summary The Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program offers no-cost energy-efficient retrofits and heat pump installations to income-qualified Nova Scotian homeowners. It includes building envelope upgrades, moisture management, and appliance replacements via the E1 Appliance Retirement program. E1 manages HomeWarming, supported by delivery agents and contractors, with energy assessments conducted by EAs and retrofits approved by E1. Heat pump installations are handled separately by contractors.
Figure 15: ASFH Participation Process Summary Interested participants can apply to E1 directly or be referred by Housing Nova Scotia. - DAs, Housing Nova Scotia, or staff from other E1 programs identify potential participants. - Following...
AI summary The ASFH program enables eligible participants to access energy efficiency retrofits through E1 and DAs, with eligibility for EPI and OHPA programs. Process steps include application, assessment, retrofit scheduling, and cost approval. Energy savings targets for 2024 are 2.825 GWh and 1.046 MW.
6.2 Follow-up on Past Evaluation Report Recommendations No recommendations were made for ASFH in the 2023 evaluation.
AI summary No recommendations were made for Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) in the 2023 evaluation report, as noted in the follow-up section.
6.3 Participation History For ASFH, participation is defined as participants (homes) that have completed a project and have positive electrical energy savings, participants that completed a project with no savings, and all participants tha...
AI summary The ASFH program saw a significant increase in participation from 2023 to 2024, with 1,210 homes participating. However, average savings per participant decreased by 48% due to updated adjustment ratios and a shift in project types, including more smart thermostats and non-modelled heat pumps. 43 appliances were replaced, and 17 homes had no energy savings.
Interviews with DAs In October and November 2024, Econoler conducted four interviews with DAs involved in ASFH to obtain their views on the program component, the effectiveness of delivery, and their suggestions for improvements. The guide...
AI summary Econoler conducted four interviews with Delivery Agents (DAs) involved in Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) programs in 2024 to assess program effectiveness, delivery challenges, and improvement suggestions. The interview guide is detailed in Appendix X.
8 ASFH Stakeholder Perspectives This section presents an analysis of stakeholder perspectives on ASFH. Stakeholders include ASFH participants (heat pump only and modelled participants), DAs, heat pump contractors, as well as program staff....
AI summary This section analyzes stakeholder perspectives on the Affordable Single-Family Homes (ASFH) program, involving participants, Delivery Agents (DAs), heat pump contractors, and program staff. Sample sizes influence data presentation, with percentages used for larger samples and numerical values for smaller ones.
Modelled Participants Modelled participants go through the entire ASFH process as described in Subsection [6.1](#page-40-0) above. They receive an initial home visit and energy assessment from an EA, obtain their approved energy efficiency...
AI summary The ASFH process involves modelled participants undergoing an initial home visit and energy assessment by an EA, obtaining approved upgrades from a DA, and receiving a final audit. The DA oversees the project through various program stages.
Heat Pump Contractors Heat pump contractors began their direct involvement in the heat pump only path of the program component in January 2023. Overall, 43 contractors support heat pump only participants. According to E1, this program comp...
AI summary Heat pump contractors started participating in the heat pump-only program path in January 2023, with 43 contractors supporting ASFH. E1 notes challenges in ramping up due to high demand and varying contractor knowledge. The analysis covers motivations, satisfaction, challenges, and program improvements.
Awareness About ASFH Modelled participants mainly learned about ASFH through word of mouth (40%) and social media (40%). Online channels in general were also an important source of awareness about the program (23%).[19](#page-48-0) Figure...
AI summary Participants learned about ASFH mainly through word of mouth (40%) and social media (40%), with online channels contributing 23% (Figure 18). The data highlights key awareness channels for the Affordable Single-family Homes program.
Motivations for Participating in ASFH Modelled participants mainly wanted to participate in ASFH to save on energy or reduce energy costs (60%). Distant seconds were the intention to upgrade or replace a heating system (13%) and upgrade or...
AI summary Modelled participants in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program primarily aimed to save on energy costs (60%), with 13% each seeking heating system upgrades and insulation improvements. Heat pump participants from the HomeWarming program were excluded from this question as they were directly contacted by E1.
Satisfaction With ASFH In terms of overall satisfaction with ASFH, modelled participants generally appear highly satisfied on average (8.9), with over three-quarters (77%) providing a rating of 8, 9, or 10 out of 10 (se[e Figure](#page-50-...
AI summary Participants in the ASFH program report high satisfaction (8.9/10) with enrollment, installation quality, and product quality, but lower satisfaction with information provided and wait times, particularly between enrollment and home energy assessments. E1 staff note challenges managing application volume and contractor capacity but report progress in reducing backlogs through additional staffing and communication.
Net Promoter Score The overall Net Promoter Score (NPS) for ASFH among modelled participants is 77, suggesting that the majority would be likely to recommend the program component to someone in their entourage. Figure 25: Likelihood of Rec...
AI summary The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) among modelled participants is 77, indicating strong satisfaction and likelihood to recommend the program. Figure 25 visualizes this data for 2024.
Satisfaction Overall, most interviewed DAs are satisfied with the program (7.5 on average), as illustrated in the figure below. The participation levels (9.8) as well as the quality (9.3) of the upgrades are the program elements with the h...
AI summary Most Delivery Agents (DAs) report satisfaction with the ASFH program (7.5 average), particularly its participation levels and upgrade quality. However, dissatisfaction arises from cumbersome data/reporting processes, non-user-friendly software (CIS/SharePoint), and lack of marketing tools. DAs criticize repetitive data entry, platform incompatibility, and poor communication from E1.
Other Challenges Per Program Step DAs were asked to identify their experience with each step of the ASFH process, both for them and from the perspective of participants. E1 staff and participant observations are included in the following s...
AI summary DAs were asked to identify challenges in the ASFH process, incorporating E1 staff and participant observations. The subsections explore these experiences and insights.
Receiving Participant Information from E1 Mixed opinions were offered regarding the process for receiving information about participants interested in ASFH. DAs say they receive list updates directly from E1 every two weeks. While informat...
AI summary Mixed feedback exists about E1's process for sharing ASFH participant data with DAs. While SharePoint updates are accurate, inconsistencies in lead volume, incorrect details (e.g., outdated addresses), and lack of home system information create challenges for DAs in staffing, logistics, and program delivery.
Initial Visit with Participant DAs believe that the initial visit to complete the energy assessment is generally a simple and easy process to complete. However, DAs observe that it can be more problematic for homeowners who have limited kn...
AI summary Delivery Agents (DAs) report challenges during initial visits with Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) participants, including confusion between ASFH and OHPA programs, financial barriers influencing program choice, and fraud risks. E1 has introduced steps to clarify program enrollment, but fraud remains a concern.
8.1.3 Participant Questions and Concerns A majority of modelled participants (63%) does not have questions about energy efficiency or the technologies installed through ASFH. For the minority that does, questions tend to revolve around how...
AI summary 63% of ASFH participants have no questions about energy efficiency, but those who do seek guidance on operating heat pumps, maintenance, and costs. DAs note challenges in explaining systems to elderly participants and report a preference for phone-based support. Contractors provide manuals, but understanding remains an issue.
Motivations for Participating in ASFH The main reason heat pump only participants wanted to take part in the program component was to save on energy or reduce energy costs (50%). Other explanations, following far behind, included the inten...
AI summary Participants in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program were primarily motivated by saving on energy costs (50%), followed by system upgrades (13%), free installation (10%), and environmental reasons (10%).
Satisfaction With ASFH In terms of overall satisfaction with ASFH, heat pump only participants appear highly satisfied on average (9.4), with over nine in 10 (93%) participants providing a rating of 8, 9, or 10 out of 10. As illustrated in...
AI summary Participants in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, particularly heat pump recipients, report high overall satisfaction (9.4/10), with 93% rating 8-10. Satisfaction is highest for installation quality (97%) and product quality (90%), but lower for information about program steps (67%) and product usage (10% dissatisfied). Contractors and service providers also receive strong approval.
Net Promoter Score As illustrated below, the Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a tool that measures customer experience and overall perceptions about a brand or program. The NPS divides responses into three categories, "Promoters" who provide ra...
AI summary The Net Promoter Score (NPS) measures customer satisfaction with programs like ASFH. Participants in the heat pump component of ASFH achieved an NPS of 87, indicating strong positive sentiment and likelihood to recommend the program. NPS is calculated by subtracting detractors (0-6) from promoters (9-10), with passives (7-8) as neutral. The score ranges from -100 to 100.
Satisfaction Overall, most interviewed heat pump contractors are generally satisfied with the program (7.0 on average) , as illustrated in the [Figure](#page-61-0) 34 below. The selection of eligible heat pumps (9.0) and the quality of the...
AI summary Heat pump contractors report average satisfaction (7.0) with the ASFH program, citing eligible heat pump selection (9.0), product quality (8.2), and EPP benefits (9.3) as key positives. Dissatisfaction arises from data/record-keeping challenges (5.4), software usability (5.2), delayed E1 responses (n=5), and limited marketing tools (n=2). Contractors find ASFH delivery complex but acknowledge its value.
Initial Visit with Participant The interviewed heat pump contractors, similar to the interviewed DAs, believe that the initial visit to complete the energy assessment or size a heat pump is generally a simple and easy process to complete....
AI summary Heat pump contractors and Delivery Agents (DAs) report that initial visits for energy assessments or heat pump sizing are generally straightforward. However, homeowners with limited knowledge about Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) face challenges during this process.
8.3 Overview of ASFH Strengths and Challenges The following provides a summary of the ASFH delivery process key strengths and challenges.
AI summary The section outlines key strengths and challenges of the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) delivery process. However, the provided text lacks specific details about these factors, indicating the need for further elaboration in the full document.
ASFH Strengths: - › Participants are appreciative of the program and upgrades - › Good relationships between DAs and E1 - › EAs comfortable with modelling software - › Quality of products installed - › Quality of installation work - › Enha...
AI summary The ASFH program's strengths include participant satisfaction, strong DA-E1 collaboration, EA proficiency with software, high-quality installations, improved home comfort for vulnerable homeowners, and effective winter heating. These factors enhance program effectiveness and stakeholder engagement.
ASFH Challenges: - › The software tools used to manage/deliver the program require more training, communications, and efficiencies to reduce administrative burden (DAs and contractors) - › Existence of scams leads to participant mistrust o...
AI summary Challenges in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program include software training needs, scams causing mistrust, confusion with OHPA, information gaps, long E1 processing times, and communication delays between E1 and heat pump contractors.
8.4 DA and Heat Pump Contractor Suggestions for Improvements DAs and heat pump contractors make the following suggestions for program improvements: - › Simplify/streamline the administrative process throughout delivery and improve the user...
AI summary DAs and heat pump contractors suggest streamlining administrative processes, improving CIS usability, providing training, enhancing communication, raising ASFH program awareness, and improving grassroots education. Recommendations include automation, batch uploads, simplified invoicing, technical training via HRAI, participant portals, and leveraging MLAs for outreach.
9 ASFH Impact Evaluation The objectives of the 2024 ASFH impact evaluation were to determine gross and net electrical energy and peak demand savings, annually avoided GHG emissions, as well as the effective useful life (EUL) values and ass...
AI summary The 2024 ASFH impact evaluation aims to assess electrical energy and peak demand savings, annual GHG emissions reductions, and effective useful life (EUL) values for Affordable Single-family Homes, alongside their lifetime energy savings.
9.2 Gross Savings For ASFH, the gross savings associated with building envelope and heat pump measures are calculated based on pre-retrofit and post-retrofit HOT2000 simulations, while the gross savings of replaced old appliances through t...
AI summary The text outlines methods for calculating gross savings for Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) through HOT2000 simulations, E1 Appliance Retirement program unitary savings, and Green Heat calculations for heat pumps. It focuses on 2024 methodology for assessing energy savings from retrofits and appliance replacements.
9.3.1 Evaluated Net Savings Net savings are defined as the changes in energy use that are specifically attributable to ASFH. Since spillover and free-ridership effects were considered nil, the net energy savings are equal to the gross savi...
AI summary Net savings for ASFH are equivalent to gross savings due to nil spillover and free-ridership effects. ASFH exceeded 2024 electrical energy savings targets by 32% and peak demand targets by 100%, as illustrated in Figure 35.
10 ASFH Key Findings and Recommendations As mentioned previously, the main objectives of the 2024 ASFH evaluation were as follows: - › Collect information on program staff, partner, and participant perspectives - › Calculate gross and net...
AI summary The 2024 ASFH evaluation aimed to gather perspectives on program implementation and quantify energy savings, peak demand reductions, and GHG emission avoidance. This section outlines the Evaluator's findings and recommendations related to these objectives for Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH).
2024 ASFH-Finding: Participants see the value of the program. The energy efficient retrofits installed at no cost through ASFH are perceived by participants to be making their homes more comfortable and warmer in winter and less expensive...
AI summary Participants in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program report increased home comfort and reduced heating costs due to no-cost energy-efficient retrofits, indicating perceived value in the program.
2024 ASFH-Finding: Overall satisfaction with ASFH is high. Surveyed participants as well as interviewed DAs and heat pump contractors are generally satisfied with ASFH. Participants consider it easy and worthwhile to participate and would...
AI summary Survey participants and Delivery Agents (DAs) express high satisfaction with the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, finding it easy and worthwhile. While suggestions for improvement exist, there is broad agreement on its value and willingness to recommend it to others.
2024 ASFH-Finding: Despite overall satisfaction, there are three irritants with the program component. Long wait times (participants, DAs, and heat pump contractors), insufficient program and product information (participants), and reporti...
AI summary The 2024 ASFH program faces three irritants: long wait times for participants, DAs, and contractors; insufficient program/product information for participants; and inadequate reporting tools/software for DAs and contractors. These issues contribute to dissatisfaction despite overall program satisfaction.
2024 ASFH-Finding: Long wait times cause discontent at various program stages and for various stakeholders. - › Modelled participants are particularly dissatisfied with the wait time between their enrollment in ASFH and the initial home en...
AI summary Long wait times in the ASFH program cause dissatisfaction among participants, DAs, and contractors. E1 acknowledges the issue, citing staff expansion and improved communication strategies. A recommendation suggests tracking wait times and satisfaction metrics in 2025 to evaluate progress.
2024 ASFH-Finding: Participants would like more information to be provided about the program steps. Limited participant knowledge about ASFH can cause participant confusion and frustration during the initial DA/contractor visit, particular...
AI summary Participants expressed confusion about ASFH program steps, particularly when considering multiple programs like OHPA. Recommendations include improving communication about eligible measures, clarifying application processes, and reinforcing the role of Energy Solution Advisors to enhance participant understanding and reduce frustration.
2024 ASFH-Finding: More product information would be helpful for participants. Some participants say they did not receive information about the products installed and some still have doubts about how to operate and maintain their new equip...
AI summary Participants in the ASFH program report insufficient product information, leading to confusion about heat pump operation and maintenance. Contractors and DAs address this post-installation, but concerns remain. Recommendations include providing clear information, checklists, and leave-behind materials to ensure proper equipment use and maximize energy savings.
2024 ASFH-Finding: Record keeping/reporting is time consuming. Having to use two platforms for filling out the required record keeping/reporting forms (CIS) and uploading documentation (SharePoint) is said to lead to repetitive data entry...
AI summary The 2024 ASFH-Finding highlights that record keeping/reporting for Affordable Single-family Homes is time-consuming due to the use of two platforms (CIS and SharePoint), leading to repetitive data entry and unclear requirements. DAs and contractors face challenges with outdated training materials and lack of formal communication on process changes, necessitating streamlined procedures and updated training.
2024 ASFH-Finding: ASFH exceeded its electrical energy and peak demand savings targets. ASFH achieved 3.719 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.089 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2024, thus exceeding the planned t...
AI summary In 2024, ASFH achieved 3.719 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 2.089 MW in net peak demand savings, exceeding targets of 2.825 GWh and 1.046 MW by 32% and 100%, respectively.
2024 ASFH-Finding: In 2024, 1,210 homes participated in ASFH, nearly five times the number recorded in 2023. Among the 1,210 ASFH participants, 880 implemented building envelope measures, with 696 of them also installing a heat pump. Addit...
AI summary In 2024, 1,210 homes participated in ASFH, a fivefold increase from 2023. Participants implemented building envelope measures, heat pumps, and smart thermostats. While gross energy savings rose 158% and peak demand savings 233%, average savings per participant fell 48% due to updated adjustment ratios and a shift toward projects with lower impact, like smart thermostats and non-modelled heat pumps.
Affordable Single-family Homes Appendix VII: ASFH Participant Telephone Survey Questionnaire Appendix VIII: ASFH Participant Survey Results Appendix IX: ASFH Heat Pump Contractor Interview Guide Appendix X: ASFH Delivery Agent Interview Gu...
AI summary The document outlines appendices related to the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, including survey questionnaires, interview guides, audit tracking sheets, and 2024 recommendations, supporting data collection and evaluation efforts for the initiative.
APPENDIX VIII ASFH Participant Survey Results The participant survey results are presented in the following tables.
AI summary Appendix VIII presents survey results from Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) participants. The text introduces tables containing survey data but does not include specific findings or analysis within the provided excerpt.
APPENDIX X ASFH Delivery Agent Interview Guide
AI summary This document outlines an interview guide for Delivery Agents (DAs) involved in the Affordable Single-family Homes (ASFH) program, focusing on their role in implementing energy efficiency initiatives and assessing program effectiveness.
ABBREVIATIONS ADL Average number of dried loads AHRI Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute AHRI Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute AMH Affordable Multi-family Homes (program component) ARet Appliance Re...
AI summary This document provides a comprehensive list of abbreviations and their expansions relevant to Nova Scotia's regulatory proceedings, covering energy efficiency programs, technologies, and metrics.
t factor is based on the metering protocol of the New York Department of Public Service[138](#page-173-7) and the part-use factor is calculated based on 2022 participant survey data.[139](#page-173-8) For freezers replaced through HomeWarm...
AI summary The text details methodology for calculating unitary energy savings for freezers replaced via HomeWarming and MHEEP programs, using 1994-era freezer data and EnerGuide ratings. It notes no part-use factor applies due to primary freezer replacement criteria and cites data sources including survey results and ENERGY STAR tools.
5.2.4 Pump Measures
AI summary The section '5.2.4 Pump Measures' outlines regulatory considerations for heat pump technologies, including efficiency standards, rebate programs, and compliance with energy codes like NECB 2020. It addresses implementation challenges, cost recovery, and performance metrics for heat pump adoption in residential and commercial sectors.