Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Incentive Structures" in M04819

Matter: E-ENSC-R-12 - Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation - Application for Approval of its Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan for 2013 - 2015
184 passages 14 documents

Incentive Structures across all matters →

E-2Evidence of ENSC as DSM Administrator 17 passages
2.2 Existing Residential p. pp. 56-57
2.2 Existing Residential The Existing Residential service is designed to promote cost-effective energy efficiency improvements to Nova Scotia's housing stock of single detached houses, duplexes, rental housing, mobile/mini homes and multi-...

AI summary The Existing Residential program promotes energy efficiency in Nova Scotia's housing stock through incentives for lighting, water heating, and appliance upgrades. Enhancements include renter eligibility, direct low-cost measure installation, innovative financing, and contractor training. The Province of Nova Scotia funds non-electric rebates, while ENSC manages the program via contracted service organizations.

2.3 New Residential p. pp. 57-60
2.3 New Residential awareness of this opportunity. The New Residential services are available to builders and owner/builders of new houses in Nova Scotia, to encourage the construction of high performance housing by promoting the use of en...

AI summary The New Residential program by ENSC aims to promote energy-efficient construction in Nova Scotia through incentives, design consultation, and marketing. It targets builders to exceed building code energy efficiency requirements, using EnerGuide ratings and tiered incentives. Collaboration with municipalities and CMHC is emphasized to enhance participation and mortgage eligibility.

Preamble p. p. 65
Custom implementation incentives are based on incremental cost investment barriers for market-driven and new construction measures, and the full-cost investment barrier for retrofit projects. While the program provides general guidance for...

AI summary Custom implementation incentives are determined based on incremental cost investment barriers for market-driven and new construction measures, and full-cost investment barriers for retrofit projects. Incentives are set through a case-by-case analysis of energy savings and rate of return.

3.3 Direct Installation p. pp. 65-70
3.3 Direct Installation In the Direct Installation category, the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program is designed to acquire electrical energy savings through the direct installation of energy-efficient measures for small busines...

AI summary The Direct Installation category under the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program focuses on acquiring electrical energy savings through direct installation of energy-efficient measures for small businesses. The program includes lighting retrofits, refrigeration upgrades, and other energy-efficient measures, with incentives covering up to 80% of project costs.

OBJECTIVES p. p. 197
OBJECTIVES Green Heating Systems, which we have defined to include systems that deliver all or most of their heat directly from renewable resources, have the potential to deliver significant benefits to Nova Scotia, including electricity s...

AI summary The document outlines the objectives of introducing Green Heating Systems (GHS) to address gaps in ENSC's existing programs. Current initiatives like EnerGuide for Houses focus on comprehensive home improvements, leaving opportunities unmet for homes with minor issues. The GHS initiative aims to create new channels through incentives, training, and marketing, targeting electricity savings while using non-DSM funds for other components.

CHANNELS p. p. 202
CHANNELS The Green Heating Systems initiative will focus primarily on existing HVAC channels, as well as on direct marketing to homes heated with electric baseboard, to promote Green Heating Systems. In order to add additional value, the i...

AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative targets existing HVAC channels and homes with electric baseboard heating, promoting ENSC's EnerGuide for Houses and Performance Plus programs with enhanced incentives.

INCENTIVES p. p. 202
INCENTIVES The initiative provides financial incentives for selected technologies, and also assumes the provision of some form of financing (developed through the Innovative Financing Enabling Strategy). The program administrator may choos...

AI summary The initiative offers financial incentives for technologies like ground source heat pumps and solar thermal systems, with potential interest rate reductions via the Innovative Financing Enabling Strategy. The program administrator may allocate funds to lower financing costs for qualifying technologies.

INFRASTRUCTURE p. p. 202
INFRASTRUCTURE ENSC will leverage the Trade Ally Network developed through its Capacity Building Enabling Strategy to increase the supply and installation quality of Green Heating Systems. This will be achieved by providing specific traini...

AI summary ENSC plans to boost Green Heating Systems through training, Trade Ally Network visibility, and upstream incentives for builders. It will also pilot pellet delivery infrastructure to support automated whole-house pellet systems, addressing current gaps in Nova Scotia's residential market.

How to take part p. pp. 238-239
How to take part - 1. Send pre-approval application form to ENSC - 2. Receive approval - 3. Purchase and install qualifying equipment - 4. Send in rebate application form and supporting docs - 5. Receive rebate cheque

AI summary The process outlines steps for participating in a rebate program managed by ENSC: submitting pre-approval, purchasing qualifying equipment, and applying for rebates. The procedure emphasizes administrative steps rather than technical or regulatory debates.

Rebates p. p. 239
Rebates

AI summary The document section titled 'Rebates' is identified, but no detailed content or analysis is provided in the text. Further information would be required to elaborate on rebate programs, stakeholders, or regulatory considerations.

Substitute p. pp. 239-240
Substitute – Wood / Pellet stoves = 20% rebate, up to $900

AI summary The document outlines a rebate program offering a 20% discount, up to $900, for wood and pellet stoves, aimed at promoting energy-efficient heating solutions.

Allan Crandlemire p. pp. 257-258
Allan Crandlemire CEO, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are two great projects that will help educate Nova Scotians on how to use energy better. The remarkable design and construction of the...

AI summary Allan Crandlemire, CEO of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlights the success of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes in promoting energy-efficient, affordable housing. He emphasizes the role of programs like Performance Plus in making energy efficiency achievable for homeowners, builders, and architects, aiming to make efficient homes the norm in Nova Scotia.

R-2000: Giving back to Homeowners p. p. 261
R-2000: Giving back to Homeowners Energy efficient homes constantly reduce their owner's carbon footprint and save them money from the day they are complete. Not only do energy efficient homes save money in energy costs through their lifes...

AI summary Energy-efficient homes reduce carbon footprint and save money, with Performance Plus rebates available for those meeting EnerGuide standards.

PerformancePlus Program p. p. 261
PerformancePlus Program In Nova Scotia, based on the building code, a home following the performance path must reach an EnerGuide rating of 80. Made available to anyone building a new home in the province, PerformancePlus is Nova Scotia's...

AI summary Nova Scotia's PerformancePlus Program encourages energy-efficient home building by requiring an EnerGuide rating of 80 and offering rebates based on a home's energy performance, with higher ratings leading to greater incentives.

The Performance Plus rebates pertaining to an EnerGuide rating are as follows: p. p. 261
The Performance Plus rebates pertaining to an EnerGuide rating are as follows: EnerGuide Rating Rebate 83 and 84 $3000 85 to 87 $5000 88 and above $7000 Other mechanical systems facilitate additional rebates. In fact, monetary incentives a...

AI summary The Performance Plus program offers rebates based on EnerGuide ratings, with higher ratings qualifying for larger rebates. Additional rebates are available for energy-efficient mechanical systems, helping homeowners reduce energy costs.

EnerGuide for Existing Houses p. p. 271
EnerGuide for Existing Houses Are you a homeowner looking to save money on your heating and power bill? If so, the EnerGuide for Existing Homes may be for you. You get access to valuable energy analysis tools and can earn rebates worth up...

AI summary EnerGuide for Existing Houses offers homeowners energy analysis tools and rebates up to $6500 for energy efficiency upgrades. Administered by ENSC, the program aims to reduce heating and power bills through targeted energy conservation measures.

This program has been extended to Dec. 31, 2011! p. p. 271
This program has been extended to Dec. 31, 2011! Apply now to help reduce your electricity bill. Whether you want to get off electric heat altogether or just want to supplement it with another energy source, earn rebates and save money by...

AI summary A program extension until December 31, 2011, encourages switching from electric heating to wood, pellet, or natural gas heating to reduce electricity bills and earn rebates. Participants can supplement electric heat or transition entirely to alternative energy sources.

E-2(r)Revised ENSC Evidence 17 passages
2.1 Efficient Product Rebates p. p. 57
2.1 Efficient Product Rebates Financial incentives to offset the higher cost of efficient products, along with public awareness, education, and retail availability, are the foundation of Efficient Product Rebates. All homeowners and renter...

AI summary The Efficient Product Rebates program offers financial incentives for high-efficiency products, including ENERGY STAR® items, and provides free efficient products for low-income residents. The Appliance Retirement component includes cash incentives and recycling for old appliances.

2.2 Existing Residential p. pp. 57-58
2.2 Existing Residential The Existing Residential service is designed to promote cost-effective energy efficiency improvements to Nova Scotia's housing stock of single detached houses, duplexes, rental housing, mobile/mini homes and multi-...

AI summary The Existing Residential program promotes energy efficiency in Nova Scotia's housing stock through incentives for lighting, heating, and appliance upgrades. It includes renter eligibility, direct installation of low-cost measures, and enhanced customer support. Funding comes from the Province of Nova Scotia, with ENSC managing service organizations for implementation.

2.3 New Residential p. pp. 58-61
2.3 New Residential The New Residential services are available to builders and owner/builders of new houses in Nova Scotia, to encourage the construction of high performance housing by promoting the use of energy-efficient products and des...

AI summary Nova Scotia's New Residential program, managed by ENSC, promotes energy-efficient home construction through design consultation, incentives, and education. It requires EnerGuide ratings of 80, with incentives increasing for higher ratings. The program collaborates with municipalities and CMHC to enhance participation and compliance with the Nova Scotia Building Code.

Preamble p. pp. 64-66
The objective of ENSC's electricity DSM initiatives in this sector is to build energy efficiency and conservation considerations into its' customers' decision-making processes. ENSC's energy efficiency services for this sector include prog...

AI summary ENSC aims to integrate energy efficiency and conservation into customer decision-making through tailored services for the Business, Non-Profit, and Institutional sector. Services include Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation. The goal is to provide a single point of contact and one-on-one support through qualified trade allies.

PERFORMANCE DRIVERS p. p. 90
PERFORMANCE DRIVERS Efficiency Nova Scotia may have a mandate to generate energy savings, but does it have the internal and external drivers to do so? In many regions throughout North America, regulators have adopted frameworks meant to ac...

AI summary The text examines whether Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENSC) has sufficient performance drivers to achieve energy savings, contrasting regulatory frameworks in North America that use mechanisms like LRAMs, decoupling, and shared savings to incentivize Demand Side Management (DSM). It notes ENSC's unique status as a non-utility, not-for-profit entity, unlike most jurisdictions where DSM is utility-administered.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS p. p. 203
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS While most of the targeted Green Heating Systems are readily available in Nova Scotia, this is not the case of whole-house, fully-automated pellet boilers and furnaces. In keeping with the recommendations of our previo...

AI summary The initiative focuses on promoting Green Heating Systems, including a pilot project for whole-house pellet boilers and third-party pellet supply distribution. It also emphasizes energy awareness through maintenance, weatherization, and whole-house approaches, with incentives aligned to ENSC's existing programs.

CHANNELS p. p. 203
CHANNELS The Green Heating Systems initiative will focus primarily on existing HVAC channels, as well as on direct marketing to homes heated with electric baseboard, to promote Green Heating Systems. In order to add additional value, the i...

AI summary The Green Heating Systems initiative targets existing HVAC channels and homes using electric baseboard heating, promoting green heating solutions. It integrates with ENSC's EnerGuide for Houses and Performance Plus programs, offering enhanced incentives for participation.

INCENTIVES p. p. 203
INCENTIVES The initiative provides financial incentives for selected technologies, and also assumes the provision of some form of financing (developed through the Innovative Financing Enabling Strategy). The program administrator may choos...

AI summary The initiative offers financial incentives for specific technologies, with the program administrator potentially using incentive funds to reduce financing interest rates for technologies like ground-source heat pumps and solar thermal systems. This approach is limited to certain technologies deemed suitable for such measures.

How to take part p. pp. 239-240
How to take part - 1. Send pre-approval application form to ENSC - 2. Receive approval - 3. Purchase and install qualifying equipment - 4. Send in rebate application form and supporting docs - 5. Receive rebate cheque

AI summary The document outlines a five-step process for participating in a rebate program: submitting a pre-approval application to ENSC, receiving approval, purchasing qualifying equipment, submitting a rebate application with documentation, and receiving a rebate cheque. The process emphasizes program administration through ENSC.

Rebates p. p. 240
Rebates

AI summary The 'Rebates' section of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document outlines discussions related to rebate programs and their administration. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), with topics focusing on program cost recovery, utility rebates, and energy efficiency initiatives. No specific claims or cross-references are detailed in the provided text.

Full Conversion p. p. 240
Full Conversion - Rebates for new central heating system and installation - Natural gas = 30% rebate (with cap) - Wood / Pellet = 40-60% rebate (with cap) - Up to $6,500 in additional rebates to remove electric and install new distribution...

AI summary The document outlines rebate programs for energy-efficient upgrades, including 30-60% rebates for new central heating systems (natural gas, wood/pellet), up to $6,500 for distribution system upgrades, and up to $750 for domestic water heating systems. Caps apply to all rebates.

Substitute p. pp. 240-241
Substitute – Wood / Pellet stoves = 20% rebate, up to $900

AI summary The text outlines a rebate program offering 20% reimbursement, up to $900, for wood and pellet stoves. The document includes an image reference but no further details on program administration, eligibility criteria, or regulatory context.

Allan Crandlemire p. pp. 258-259
Allan Crandlemire CEO, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation The Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes are two great projects that will help educate Nova Scotians on how to use energy better. The remarkable design and construction of the...

AI summary Allan Crandlemire, CEO of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, highlights the success of the Efficiency Nova Scotia Demonstration Homes in promoting energy efficiency. He emphasizes the affordability and long-term savings of energy-efficient homes, supported by programs like Performance Plus, and advocates for their widespread adoption in Nova Scotia.

R-2000: Giving back to Homeowners p. p. 262
R-2000: Giving back to Homeowners Energy efficient homes constantly reduce their owner's carbon footprint and save them money from the day they are complete. Not only do energy efficient homes save money in energy costs through their lifes...

AI summary Energy-efficient homes reduce carbon footprints and save owners money over time. Some homes qualify for Performance Plus rebates if they meet EnerGuide standards, offering additional financial incentives for compliance.

PerformancePlus Program p. p. 262
PerformancePlus Program In Nova Scotia, based on the building code, a home following the performance path must reach an EnerGuide rating of 80. Made available to anyone building a new home in the province, PerformancePlus is Nova Scotia's...

AI summary The PerformancePlus Program in Nova Scotia is a home energy efficiency initiative requiring new homes to meet an EnerGuide rating of 80. It offers rebates based on energy performance, encouraging energy-efficient construction.

EnerGuide for Existing Houses p. p. 272
EnerGuide for Existing Houses Are you a homeowner looking to save money on your heating and power bill? If so, the EnerGuide for Existing Homes may be for you. You get access to valuable energy analysis tools and can earn rebates worth up...

AI summary The EnerGuide for Existing Homes program offers homeowners energy analysis tools and rebates up to $6500 for energy efficiency upgrades, aiming to reduce heating and power costs.

This program has been extended to Dec. 31, 2011! p. p. 272
This program has been extended to Dec. 31, 2011! Apply now to help reduce your electricity bill. Whether you want to get off electric heat altogether or just want to supplement it with another energy source, earn rebates and save money by...

AI summary The program, extended until December 31, 2011, offers rebates to reduce electricity bills by switching to wood, pellet, or natural gas heating.

E-3ENSC 2011 DSM Evaluation Report prepared by Econoler 86 passages
Section 18
program b Including the Fuel Substitution pilot c Including the Low Income Renter program d Including the BER and SLC programs Appliance Retirement Program The net savings achieved by the ARet program greatly exceeded those tracked by ENSC...

AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARet) and Appliance Replacement (ARep) programs achieved significantly higher net savings than Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) tracked, due to revised unitary savings values based on metering data. Econoler's evaluation methods for dehumidifiers and air conditioners also contributed. The Retail Markdown Program is mentioned in the context of DSM program evaluations.

Section 1316
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX IV – INTERVIEW GUIDE WITH PROGRAM MANAGER Process Evaluation Program Name: EnerGuide for Existing Houses & Multi-Units Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: Li...

AI summary The document discusses the 2011 evaluation report of the EnerGuide for Existing Houses & Multi-Units program, including interview questions and comments related to the program's status with Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN), the Provincial Government, and Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). It also raises questions about the status of various recommendations and findings, including discrepancies in thermostat savings between existing and new houses.

Section 1317
F 16 : What is the status for this finding? Page 1 C: As I understand it, there are 3 sources of incentives. (NRCan, ENSC and the Provincial Government. This is somewhat difficult to track? Page 2 Q: Multi-unit residential buildings where...

AI summary The text discusses challenges with the EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program, including the difficulty of tracking incentives from multiple sources, concerns about program management and consistency, and confusion over rebate calculations and financing options. Questions are raised about the accuracy of consumption and savings estimates and the clarity of program guidelines.

Section 1318
ase? C: In the Enroll in the Program section, Step five (maximum building envelope rebate and the section about the multiplier) is difficult to understand but is well explained in the program manual. C: A process flow chart could help the...

AI summary The text discusses challenges with the Enroll in the Program section, particularly the complexity of incentives, maximums, and the involvement of multiple organizations. Participants request clarification on how savings are calculated and whether incentives can overlap for a single measure.

Section 1367
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2011 process and impact evaluation of the Fuel Substitution Pilot. The 2011 evaluation was based on one in-depth interview...

AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Fuel Substitution Pilot program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), which provides financial incentives to homeowners to reduce electricity use for heating and domestic hot water. The program had 296 participants and achieved 1.570 GWh in net energy savings, meeting expectations of 1.8 GWh.

Section 1436
notice that natural gas equipment have no capacity specified. Care to comment? Q: The incentives have been calculated based on what exactly: uninstalling, acquisition, installation and inspection? Ref.: 5725 34 Fuel Substitution Pilot Effi...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions and comments regarding the Fuel Substitution Pilot program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC). Topics include program incentives, participant responsibilities, form requirements, and verification processes for eligibility and cost calculations.

Section 1763
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Page 13 C: The program logic model: In our opinion, the ‘’Energy Savings and Bill Reduction’’ bubble’’ should be moved to the Short Term Outcome section. Care to comment? Q: Also th...

AI summary The document contains questions and comments regarding the Energy Savings and Bill Reduction program logic model, eligibility criteria for homes with electric baseboards, and discrepancies between incentives listed on the website and in the program manual. It also references the renaming of the program to Performance Plus and concerns about double incentives for achieving high EnerGuide scores.

Section 1799
8) 692-4899 www.econoler.com BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES PROGRAM IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION 2011 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report February 20, 2012 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evalu...

AI summary This document is the final evaluation report for the Business Energy Rebates Program conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011. It provides an assessment of the program's impact and process.

Section 1806
PROTOCOL .................................................................................... 72 APPENDIX VII – ALGORITHM FOR FREE-RIDERSHIP CALCULATION......................................... 86 Ref.: 5725 iii Business Energy Rebates Pro...

AI summary This document is an evaluation report for the Business Energy Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011. It provides an analysis of the program's performance and outcomes.

Section 1810
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2011 process and impact evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. The 2011 evaluation was based on in-depth...

AI summary This 2011 evaluation report assesses the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, which provides financial incentives to commercial and industrial clients to reduce energy consumption. The program was improved in 2011 with better promotion, streamlined application processes, and free-ridership screening. The program aimed to achieve 21.80 GWh in electricity savings.

Section 1811
ally, a participant process flow chart was developed by ENSC in order to make the program participation procedures clearer. The program aimed to achieve net electricity savings of 21.80 GWh in 2011. KEY FINDINGS The 2011 evaluation of the...

AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program showed it is well designed with good potential for success. Participant numbers increased significantly from 13 to 106, and net energy savings rose from 0.503 GWh to 7.002 GWh. Contractors were a key source of program awareness, and the ENSC website was effective in promoting the program.

Section 1816
cate energy savings and cost reductions, which constitutes the most important motivation for participating in the BER program and for installing energy-efficient equipment. BER-R3. Increase program promotion: The fact that the ENSC website...

AI summary The BER program aims to promote energy savings and cost reductions through the installation of energy-efficient equipment. While the ENSC has made progress in program promotion, there is a need for more aggressive outreach strategies. Additionally, collecting more detailed information from participants is recommended to improve the accuracy of savings calculations for various energy measures.

Section 1819
e net electricity savings of 21.80 GWh in 2011. In 2010, the BER program generated net electricity savings of 0.503 GWh. Eligible Measures The prescribed measures are divided into seven categories: > Lighting Fixtures & Lamps; > Occupancy...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program generated 0.503 GWh of net electricity savings in 2010 and 21.80 GWh in 2011. The program allows eligible commercial customers to apply for rebates on energy-efficient products, which are categorized into seven types, including lighting, HVAC systems, and compressed air equipment.

Section 1820
L The program logic model below shows the causal links between program activities and the changes expected in the market. Figure 1: Business Energy Rebates Program Logic Model Ref.: 5725 2 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Sc...

AI summary The document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including the analysis of program documentation and an in-depth interview with the program manager. It references the Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and the program logic model.

Section 1823
11 ±20.1% 2011 Participants 1062 43 ±9.7% 2.2.5 In-Depth Interviews with Participants In December, four in-depth interviews were conducted with participants of the BER program. The participants contacted for these interviews were flagged f...

AI summary In December, four in-depth interviews were conducted with participants of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program to validate information from the application form and gain insight into their experience with the program. The interviews were a follow-up to a telephone survey and aimed to confirm additional purchases of energy-efficient products.

Section 1825
BER Program Program Manual Content Manual Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives Eligibility criteria Program partners and their roles Not Applicable...

AI summary The document outlines the structure and content of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) Program manual, including sections such as program description, incentives, eligibility criteria, and evaluation plans. It also references an evaluation report from 2011 and indicates the inclusion of various program-related documents.

Section 1826
rocess flow chart Program forms Information included in the program manual Information partially included in the program manual No information Econoler has analyzed the program manual. It contains a lot of relevant information useful for b...

AI summary Econoler has reviewed the BER program manual and found it contains useful information but needs streamlining due to repetitions. Recommendations include documenting program assumptions, incentive calculations, inspection criteria, and free-ridership scoring mechanisms.

Section 1829
ne database). However, for certain projects, online documents were consulted to obtain and validate details on the measures installed, such as the number or type of product and the hours of operation. In general, the tracking sheet is usef...

AI summary The tracking sheet used for the Business Energy Rebates Program provides essential program administration data but lacks sufficient detail to fully evaluate energy savings or validate calculations. Improvements are recommended to enhance its usefulness for program monitoring and evaluation.

Section 1836
process flow chart was also developed by ENSC in order to make the program participation procedures clearer. However, Econoler has the following recommendations regarding program design and delivery: > Develop an evaluation plan in paralle...

AI summary Econoler recommends developing an evaluation plan alongside program design, monitoring application processing delays, and informing participants about expected savings from the Business Energy Rebates Program. These measures aim to improve program rigor and customer satisfaction.

Section 1838
ram (now called Small Business Energy Solutions), while three participated in the Commercial and Industrial Custom program. Table 5: Previous Program Participation Other Program Participation 2011 (%) Sample Size 43 Yes 21% No 65% Don’t kn...

AI summary The document discusses previous program participation, noting that some participants were in the Small Business Energy Solutions program and others in the Commercial and Industrial Custom program. It also mentions that awareness of the Business Energy Rebates Program is being evaluated.

Section 1840
Other 1 Don’t know 1 Multiple mentions Ref.: 5725 13 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.3 Participant Motivations and Barriers The most important reasons for participating in the B...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program evaluation report highlights that the primary motivations for participation are saving on energy costs (44%) and taking advantage of program rebates (33%).

Section 1841
tant reasons for participating in the BER program are to save on energy costs (44%) and take advantage of program rebates (33%). Table 7: Reasons for Participating

AI summary The text highlights that the primary reasons for participating in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program are to save on energy costs (44%) and to take advantage of program rebates (33%).

Section 1843
5% Easy process 1 1 Energy conservation 1 Already pay into the program 1 Other 5% 5% Don’t know 1 12% Ref.: 5725 14 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report

AI summary The document presents survey responses regarding the Business Energy Rebates Program (BER) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), highlighting participant feedback on ease of process, energy conservation, and other factors, with a small percentage indicating they do not know about the program.

Section 1844
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Respondents were asked their motivations for installing energy-efficient equipment. Among those who had implemented lighting measures (n = 34), savings on energy costs was the most...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report highlights that saving on energy costs is the primary motivation for installing energy-efficient equipment, with 84% of respondents citing this as their main reason. Improving lighting conditions and taking advantage of rebates were also important but less frequently mentioned.

Section 1845
ing in the BER program, program activities and documentation should continue to focus on energy bill savings. Table 8: Importance of Motivations for Product Installation

AI summary The text emphasizes that the BER program should continue to focus on energy bill savings through its activities and documentation. It references a table that discusses the importance of motivations for product installation.

Section 1847
educe maintenance 3% 9% 9% 4% costs Reduce carbon 6% 1 7% 3% footprint Old equipment, replace 3% 1 1 1 9% 4% prior to failure Part of building 1 2% 1% renovation or addition Other 12% 3% 1 1 1 1 19% 8% Don’t know/refused 6% 1 7% 3% Ref.: 5...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program evaluation report indicates that contractors play a significant role in promoting the program and specifying energy efficiency measures. One-third of respondents reported that someone within their organization was responsible, while 30% and 28% cited manufacturer representatives and contractors, respectively.

Section 1848
ghts the importance of contractors in program promotion. Table 9: Individual Responsible for Specifying Measures Implemented through the BER Program Main Responsible 2011 (%) Sample Size 43 Someone within company/organization 35% Manufactu...

AI summary The text discusses the role of contractors in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program and highlights that most participants did not face barriers during program participation. A small percentage of respondents reported issues such as lack of information and product ineligibility.

Section 1849
10 88% Yes 1 9% Don’t know 2% Ref.: 5725 16 Business Energy Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.4 Energy Attitudes Nearly all respondents believe reducing energy usage (98%) and managing energy cos...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates Program evaluation report highlights that nearly all respondents (98%) believe reducing energy usage is important, and 93% consider managing energy costs important. Respondents are also likely to purchase energy-efficient products in the future, similar to 2010 results.

Section 1850
ery important’ and 1= ‘not at all important’ All respondents are likely to purchase energy-efficient products when installing or replacing products in the future, which is similar to 2010 results. Table 12: Likelihood of Purchasing Energy-...

AI summary The survey indicates that respondents are very likely to purchase energy-efficient products in the future, similar to 2010 results. However, most participants had not engaged in other programs before or after the BER program, suggesting potential timing issues or a need for increased promotion of ENSC's other programs.

Section 1851
. This could be a mere timing issue since their participation was fairly recent. However, ENSC could still promote additional actions to participants by providing information on its other programs. Ref.: 5725 17 Business Energy Rebates Pro...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) had a significant influence on participants' decisions to implement energy efficiency measures, with rebates being the most impactful factor (mean 7.3) followed by initial contact information (mean 6.4).

Section 1852
atest influence on the decision (mean of 7.3 on an importance scale from 0 to 10). The information received during the initial contact was also deemed important by program participants (mean of 6.4). Table 13: Influence of Program Elements...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program's influence on participation was evaluated, with ENSC rebates and initial information being the most important factors. The mean scores for these elements were 7.3 and 6.4, respectively, indicating their significant impact on program engagement.

Section 1853
a Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.6.6 Program Satisfaction and Improvement Suggestions Program participants are highly satisfied with the BER program. Indeed, nine in 10 participants (91%) offered a rating of 5 or 4 on a 5-point scale...

AI summary Participants in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program are highly satisfied, with 91% rating the program 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale. High satisfaction is reported in areas such as staff interactions, availability, and application processes, while discounts and rebate timing received lower but still positive ratings.

Section 1854
re negatively by participants from similar programs. Be that as it may, the results obtained by ENSC are rather positive. Table 14: Satisfaction with BER Program Aspect of Program n 2010 (#) n 2011 (%) Program overall 11 8 42 91% Interacti...

AI summary The evaluation report highlights high satisfaction levels with the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, with over 80% of participants expressing satisfaction with various aspects such as program overall, interactions with staff, and eligibility confirmation. Suggestions for improvement include more information sessions, better marketing, and improved communication between customers and program staff.

Section 1855
rogram, a small number of respondents would like more information or information sessions (14%), better marketing of the program (12%) or better communication between customers and program staff (9%). More specifically, analysis of respond...

AI summary Respondents suggest improving program awareness through better marketing, information sessions, and advertising on agricultural websites. They also recommend increasing interactions with businesses and improving communication with program staff. Some respondents noted difficulties in accessing program representatives and suggested electronic forms for easier participation.

Section 1856
fill it in by hand instead of by keyboard so I guess a form where I could fill it in on my computer would be my suggestion.” Table 15: Recommendations to Improve Program Suggestions to Improve the BER Program 2010 (#) 2011 (%) Sample Size...

AI summary The document presents recommendations for improving the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program based on survey responses from 2010 and 2011. Key suggestions include better marketing, improved communication, and more user-friendly forms. The evaluation report is from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011.

Section 1857
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report A combined six in 10 respondents (58%) feel that a diagram illustrating the various steps to follow in order to participate in the BER program would have facilitated their participa...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program indicates that 58% of respondents felt a diagram illustrating the steps to participate in the BER program would have facilitated their participation. This suggests that the process flow chart developed by ENSC in late 2011 was a positive initiative.

Section 1862
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For lighting measures, energy savings varied from 336 kWh to 1,087,932 kWh per site. In order to include both sites with significant energy savings and sites with lower energy savin...

AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation discusses energy savings from lighting measures, stratifying sites based on energy savings. It outlines an on-site visit protocol for data collection and describes the methodology for calculating gross savings from completed projects in the BER program.

Section 1863
es in the BER program cover seven categories, with some categories presenting several sub-categories. A specific savings calculation methodology is used for each category or sub- category of measures. The structure of the tracking sheet do...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program includes seven categories with sub-categories, each using a specific savings calculation methodology. Econoler validated the savings calculations by reviewing the methodology, conducting on-site visits, and adjusting discrepancies found in the tracking sheet for 11 participants, impacting total gross demand savings calculations.

Section 1875
or the BER program are estimated at 8.754 GWh at the meter and at 9.340 GWh at the generator. The total gross demand savings are estimated at 1.775 MW at the meter and at 1.895 MW at the generator. Ref.: 5725 29 Business Energy Rebates Pro...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program is estimated to save 8.754 GWh at the meter and 9.340 GWh at the generator, with total gross demand savings of 1.775 MW at the meter and 1.895 MW at the generator.

Section 1882
ions for these products. The gross savings including interactive effects factor are presented in Table 21. Table 21: Gross Savings at the Meter – Including Interactive Effects Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Lighting Lighting Meas...

AI summary The text presents Table 21, which shows gross energy and demand savings from the BER program, including interactive effects factors. After applying these factors, total gross savings are estimated at 8.436 GWh for energy and 1.710 MW for demand.

Section 1886
nd installed additional energy-efficient products following their previous participation in the program. Additional questions were used to verify the eligibility of the additional purchases by asking: > the date of the purchase to ensure t...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates program conducted follow-up calls to verify participant eligibility and assess the program's influence on additional purchases. Product specifications were collected to estimate energy savings, and internal spillover was calculated using a specific equation.

Section 1896
nt of the records. However, that information is available in the online database for each project and should also be in each project paper file. The tracking should then be updated to reflect that fact. Ref.: 5725 38 Business Energy Rebate...

AI summary The text discusses the availability of information in an online database for each project and the need to update tracking to reflect this. It references a 2011 evaluation report on Business Energy Rebates by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.

Section 1898
0-day delay to process the application and receive the incentive should be monitored to ensure that it is respected and avoid any complaints regarding delays. 12. Inform participants about expected customer savings: Once the final rebate i...

AI summary The text outlines recommendations for improving the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including monitoring application processing delays, informing participants of expected savings, including revision dates on application forms, and emphasizing energy bill savings in program communications.

Section 1903
be collected during the C&I telephone survey campaigns conducted by ENSC. This would provide for a better evaluation of the interactive effects factor. Ref.: 5725 41 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluatio...

AI summary The document discusses the results of a survey conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) on the energy costs of commercial and industrial (C&I) respondents. It highlights that energy costs vary significantly among organizations, with some organizations reporting energy costs as less than 10% of their annual budget, while others report over 50%.

Section 1904
organizations (2), energy costs make up more than one-half of their annual operating budget. The average is 20 percent. Table 23: Energy Costs as a Percent of Annual Operating Budget Percent of Budget 2010 (#) 2011 (# ) Sample Size 11 15 L...

AI summary The text discusses energy costs as a significant portion of annual operating budgets for organizations, with an average of 20.3% in 2011. It also references an evaluation report on Business Energy Rebates by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.

Section 1907
1 Forestry 1 Other 16% Ref.: 5725 43 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report The number of employees varies among respondents. Two in 10 respondents have fewer than five full-time employees in thei...

AI summary The document provides an overview of employee numbers and business operating hours for respondents in the 2011 Business Energy Rebates evaluation report. It highlights that 21% of respondents have fewer than five full-time employees, and the average number of hours businesses are open per week is 87.

Section 1908
report their business is open 80 to 119 hours per week. The average number of hours per week during which organizations are open is 87. Table 26: Hours of Operation Hours per Week 2010 (#) 2011 (%) Sample Size 11 43 Less than 40 1 3% 40 to...

AI summary The report discusses the hours of operation for businesses and the type of companies participating in the Business Energy Rebates program. It notes that the average number of hours per week businesses are open is 87.2, and two-thirds of respondents are independent businesses.

Section 1909
ndent 8 67% Part of a larger company 3 30% Don’t know 2% The majority of respondents report that their organizations have between one and five business locations in Nova Scotia (72%), and two in 10 have six or more business locations (21%)...

AI summary The document discusses the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including a recommendation to improve incentive levels and develop a rational incentive structure. It references a 46% free-ridership rate and mentions a questionnaire used in the application process.

Section 1913
he worksheets that are available from the Web site and filled by the participant? Q: General comment: This program manual really needs to be simplified; there are too many repetitions. CGI Document Q: We understand that this document is to...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about the complexity and clarity of a program manual for the Business Energy Rebates program, including questions about savings calculations, worksheet usage, and participant understanding of incentives. It also references an evaluation report from 2011.

Section 1915
mber 20, 2011 Interviewer: Date of Interview: Company Contacted: Respondent Name: Title: Phone Number: Hello, my name is from Econoler. Hello, may I please speak with _? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. Person responsible currently unavailab...

AI summary This document outlines an interview conducted by Econoler on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Business Energy Rebates Program. The purpose is to gather feedback from participants regarding their experience and additional purchases of energy-efficient products since joining the program.

Section 1917
pecifically talk about the additional (from survey results or from interview) measures which your company implemented on its own after participating in the BER program. Ref.: 5725 52 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporati...

AI summary The document outlines a series of questions related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, asking participants about their purchases, installation dates, product details, and whether they claimed rebates. It also inquires about additional measures taken after participating in the BER program.

Section 1918
tional measures following your participation in the BER program or did you make the decision based on your technical knowledge or based on an electrician or supplier recommendation? SP3. (Ask if an additional measure was implemented after...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at gathering information about the implementation of energy efficiency measures by businesses after participating in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It seeks details on product types, quantities, installation dates, suppliers, and rebate claims.

Section 1919
ric contractor, other…)? SP3f. Did you claim a rebate through the BER program or through any other program for this product? If not, are you planning to claim a rebate for this product? SP3g. Did you decide to implement the additional meas...

AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on participant satisfaction, future purchase intentions, and recommendations. It asks about rebate claims, decision-making factors, and overall satisfaction with the program's aspects such as communication, paperwork, and incentives.

Section 1920
ny or organization to purchase energy-efficient products when installing or replacing energy-using products for your business in the future? [98 = Don’t know/Don’t recall, 99 = Refused] S3. Did you experience any specific challenge or face...

AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focusing on participant experiences, challenges, and suggestions for improvement. The survey aims to gather feedback on program barriers, issues encountered, and potential enhancements.

Section 1921
September 29, 2011 Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] [INTRODUCTION] Hello, I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an...

AI summary This text is an introduction to a survey conducted by CRA on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation to evaluate the Business Energy Rebates Program. The survey aims to gather feedback from participants to improve the program. Nova Scotia Power is mentioned as the former sponsor of the program.

Section 1922
V2. Is there someone else at your company or organization who would know about your company / organization’s participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Business Energy Rebates Program? 1. Yes (Ask for name: and telephone #: _) (Thank and te...

AI summary The text outlines a survey process aimed at identifying the most knowledgeable individual within a company or organization regarding their participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Business Energy Rebates Program. It includes steps to determine if another person is more familiar with the program and instructions for contacting the appropriate individual.

Section 1924
1 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) P4. How did you learn about the Business Energy Rebates Program? [RANDOMIZE AND READ 1-7, THEN READ CODE 96] (multiple responses) 1. From Efficiency Nova Scotia literature 2. From Efficiency Nova Scotia pre...

AI summary The text includes a survey question about how respondents learned about the Business Energy Rebates Program and another about the most important reason for participation. The survey is part of an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.

Section 1925
rt P5. What was the SINGLE most important reason your company or organization chose to participate in the Business Energy Rebates program? (DO NOT READ – accept one response) 1. (to take advantage of program rebates) 2. (this was part of a...

AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation in the Business Energy Rebates program, asking for the most important reasons for participation and verification of actions taken. It references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.

Section 1926
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report VA2. [IF SAMPLE VARIABLE MOTOR = YES] Do you recall installing new motors or variable speed drives as part of the Business Energy Rebates Program? 1. Yes 2. No (If No: VA2a Are you...

AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011, containing survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program. It asks participants whether they recall installing energy-efficient equipment such as motors, refrigeration systems, compressed air equipment, and HVAC systems as part of the program.

Section 1927
[IF SAMPLE VARIABLE HVAC = YES] Do you recall installing new heating, ventilation or air conditioning (HVAC) equipment or upgrades as part of the Business Energy Rebates Program? 1. Yes 2. No (If No: VA5a Are you sure? According to our rec...

AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, specifically about HVAC installations and the roles of various professionals in project design. It also outlines follow-up procedures for verifying responses across different measure categories.

Section 1929
2011 Evaluation Report 13. (newly-constructed building) 14. (Other: Please Specify: _) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) VA9. [IF MORE THAN ONE MEASURE CATEGORY IN SAMPLE] Were the factors motivating you to install the other energy efficient...

AI summary The text includes survey questions from the 2011 Evaluation Report related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, focusing on factors influencing energy-efficient upgrades and free-ridership. It contains structured response options and references to Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.

Section 1930
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report [READ FIRST TIME THROUGH ONLY] Now I would like to ask you to consider what actions you would have taken in the absence of the Business Energy Rebates Program. If your company or or...

AI summary The document asks respondents to evaluate the likelihood they would have taken specific energy efficiency actions in the absence of the Business Energy Rebates Program, using a scale from 0 to 10.

Section 1931
cient [MEASURE CATEGORY] equipment that you installed through the Program but at a later date? _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused IF FR2c > 5, then ask: FR2cc. DO NOT POSE FR2cc IF DON’T KNOW OR REFUSED IN Q.FR2c You indicated in your r...

AI summary The text outlines a survey question related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking respondents how much later they would have installed energy-efficient equipment if the program had not been available. It also provides alternative response options for those who have difficulty specifying a time frame.

Section 1932
4. 2 to less than 3 years later? 5. 3 to less than 4 years later? 6. 4 or more years later? 7. (Never) 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FR3. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid your company or organization $[REBATE VALUE FROM SAMPLE BY CATEGORY] for...

AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking respondents about timing and the importance of the program in their decision to implement energy-efficient measures. It also references an evaluation report from 2011.

Section 1933
s Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The Efficiency Nova Scotia _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused rebate(s) b. Information received during the initial contact by the _ Res...

AI summary The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2011, focusing on the Business Energy Rebates Program. It includes survey questions about participants' reasons for applying for rebates and whether they implemented additional energy-efficient measures after participating.

Section 1934
y additional energy-efficient measures on its own in any Nova Scotia location of your company 1 Yes 2 No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 65 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SP2. [I...

AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the implementation of energy-efficient measures by businesses participating in the Business Energy Rebates Program. It asks about the timing of implementation and whether other financing or rebates were used.

Section 1935
1. Yes 2. No 96. (Don’t know) SP4b. Heating, Ventilating and Air conditioning (HVAC) measures? 1. Yes 2. No 96. (Don’t know) Ref.: 5725 66 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report SP4c. Lighting mea...

AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Business Energy Rebates Program, asking participants about their adoption of energy-efficient measures and the influence of the program on their decisions. The survey includes multiple choice and rating scale questions.

Section 1936
program was “extremely influential in your decision to implement additional energy-efficient measures.” [RECORD RESPONSE 0-10, 98 = Don’t know, 99 = REFUSED] DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE Ref.: 5725 67 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scoti...

AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebates Program and includes survey questions about participants' experiences with the program, including satisfaction with application processes, communication, rebate amounts, and likelihood of future participation in energy efficiency initiatives.

Section 1937
t lighting, when installing or replacing energy-using products for your business in the future? [9=Don’t know/Don’t recall] BARRIERS TO ACTIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS [B SERIES] B1. Were there any challenges or barriers that yo...

AI summary The text discusses barriers faced by businesses when implementing energy-efficient measures through the Business Energy Rebates Program, including concerns about savings, lack of information, and administrative challenges. It includes survey questions and response options.

Section 1938
13. (lack of time / too busy) 14. (focused on core business) 96. (Other – SPECIFY: ) 98. (Don’t know) (Go to B4) 99. (Refused) (Go to B4) B3. What was the SECOND most important barrier? (DO NOT READ - ACCEPT ONE RESPONSE – SAME LIST AS B2)...

AI summary The text outlines survey questions related to barriers to energy efficiency, the importance of reducing energy usage and managing energy costs, and feedback on the Business Energy Rebates Program. It also references an evaluation report on the Business Energy Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.

Section 1941
END. Those are all the questions I have for you. I thank you very much for your time and cooperation and have a nice day! Ref.: 5725 71 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report APPENDIX VI – ON-SITE...

AI summary The document text includes a section from an evaluation report on Business Energy Rebates by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, specifically Appendix VI, which outlines an on-site visit protocol for assessing building heating and cooling systems.

Section 1942
e at the site Heating system 1 Heating system 2 Heating system 3 Heating system 4 Heat source Heating system type Heating system efficiency or COP Cooling system: Please fill the table below for each cooling source at the site Cooling syst...

AI summary The text includes tables for heating and cooling systems, facility operation hours, and lighting usage, along with a reference to a 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on Business Energy Rebates.

Section 1945
of equipment, indicate the number of equipment with a Type of lighting measures installed on site specific wattage. Use additional sheets if required. Ref.: 5725 75 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation...

AI summary The document refers to a 2011 evaluation report on the Business Energy Rebates program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, discussing the installation of new equipment and baseline equipment.

Section 1948
Collect product LED number streetlight / parking light Ref.: 5725 76 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report

AI summary The document references a 2011 evaluation report on the Business Energy Rebates program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes a reference number (5725) and a page number (76).

Section 1951
Metal Halide? Was a HPS or Metal Pulse Start Metal Halide - Halide Fixture Fixture installed? Is HPS or Metal Electronic Ballast Halide Fixture Metal Halide - installed? Fixture Ref.: 5725 77 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia...

AI summary The text refers to a 2011 Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation on the Business Energy Rebates program, discussing energy-efficient lighting fixtures such as Metal Halide and HPS fixtures.

Section 1955
ort VSD Date of installation (From database): Date of installation (Contact declaration): Total number of equipment installed – From database: Total number of equipment installed – Site validation: Use additional sheets if required VSD 1 V...

AI summary This document contains a form for recording information about variable speed drives (VSDs) installed under the Business Energy Rebates program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for installation dates, equipment details, operational status, and load profiles.

Section 1956
e (kWh or flow: circle the appropriate one) Full load 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% percent % yearly hours at each load Ref.: 5725 80 Business Energy Rebates Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report HVAC Date of...

AI summary The document contains a form related to the Business Energy Rebates program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for equipment installation details, validation, and performance metrics, specifically for HVAC systems.

Section 1959
Refrigeration Date of installation (From database): Date of installation (Contact declaration): Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since when? Type of equipment installed – From database: Type of equipment installed – On site val...

AI summary The document includes forms and data collection tools related to the Business Energy Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on refrigeration equipment details such as installation dates, usage hours, and system efficiency.

Section 2023
-performance and low wattage T8 lamps in 2011 will be significantly lower/higher (select the appropriate term) than for the previous year. Is there any reason for this change? [PROBE: market trend, more competitors offering these products,...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of the Smart Lighting Choices Program on the sales of high-performance and low wattage T8 lamps in 2011, asking whether the incentive influenced sales and by how much. It also inquires about other rebates offered for these products.

Section 2026
n available, do you think that your sales of HPT8 ballasts in 2011 would have been about the same or lower? 1. Same [GO TO E3] 2. Lower [GO TO E2a] Ref.: 5725 31 Smart Lighting Choices Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evalua...

AI summary The text is a series of questions from an evaluation report on the Smart Lighting Choices Program in 2011. It seeks to determine the impact of the program on sales of HPT8 ballasts and high-performance T8 lamps, including whether other rebates were available and their sources.

Section 2027
cial Government $ 7. City/Town/Municipality $ 97. Other $ 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) E4. In 2011, how important would you say the incentive from the Smart Lighting Choices Program was in customers’ decision to purchase HPT8 ballasts? P...

AI summary The text includes survey questions about the importance of the Smart Lighting Choices Program's incentives in influencing customer purchases of HPT8 ballasts, as well as inquiries about the adequacy of the incentive amounts and their use for marketing purposes. It also references an evaluation report from 2011.

Section 2081
ocess flow chart Program forms Information included in the program manual Information partially included in the program manual No information The Evaluator analyzed the C&IC program manual and found that it contains relevant information us...

AI summary The Evaluator found that the C&IC program manual contains useful information but recommends adding details on M&V aspects and explaining the 'Custom Client Response Process' form. These improvements would enhance clarity and support program management and evaluation.

Section 2177
matically require third-party M&V from those for which it would be optional. The Evaluator believes that third-party M&V could be done either by ENSC or by an independent consultant. > Build the capacity of ENSC on M&V and IPMVP requiremen...

AI summary The Evaluator notes that third-party M&V is not consistently applied in ENSC projects, with many projects lacking proper M&V plans and reports that comply with IPMVP standards. Discrepancies in measurement methods, such as using spot measurements instead of run-time measurements, have led to inaccuracies in savings calculations.

Section 2248
the BER program in order to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) appreciate the relative importance of such program. cases. 8 Once the feasibility study (for the NCWB Tracking the results of the validation process approach) including building...

AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program and the validation process for the NCWB approach, including building modeling, external validation by a consultant, and the measurement and verification of completed projects over three years to ensure accuracy.

Section 2426
- -7.7% 4 ADS ASSOCIÉS, “Évaluations des effets énergétiques combinés des mesures d’économies d’énergie – résidence unifamiliale,” report presented to Hydro-Québec, 1992. Ref.: 5725 32 Small Business Energy Solutions Program Efficiency Nov...

AI summary The document discusses the methodology for calculating energy savings from lighting products installed in refrigeration units, using an approach similar to that used in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. It mentions an interactive effects factor of +40 percent for such installations and references a table presenting gross savings including these effects.

Section 2458
ng a minimum number of installations? Page 7 Q: If the main objective of ENSC is to save electricity, why are municipal utilities not eligible for the bill financing of 20% like the clients of NSP? Q: What is the proportion (%) of particip...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions raised during a regulatory proceeding regarding the Small Business Energy Solutions Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. The questions focus on program eligibility, incentive levels, verification processes, and administrative procedures.

E-5Savings Verification Report of the DSM Administrator's 2011 Demand Side Management Programs 4 passages
(1) Residential Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) p. p. 5
(1) Residential Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) This Appliance Retirement Program involves the pickup and disassembly of old refrigerators, freezers, room air conditioners and dehumidifiers for all of Nova Scotia. This program provides...

AI summary The Residential Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) recycles old appliances in Nova Scotia, offering rebates for eligible items. A 2011 metering study informed energy savings calculations, with Econoler's methods deemed reasonable. Net savings exceeded ENSC estimates by 71%, and two Econoler recommendations—collecting capacity data and on-site metering—are supported to improve accuracy.

(2) Residential Appliance Replacement Program (ARep) p. p. 5
(2) Residential Appliance Replacement Program (ARep) Appliance replacement serves multi-unit residential apartment buildings and is a resource acquisition program. It combines provision of new energy efficient refrigerators and freezers at...

AI summary The Residential Appliance Replacement Program (ARep) replaces inefficient refrigerators/freezers in multi-unit buildings with Energy Star appliances, offering rebates and removing old units. Econoler evaluated savings using data from the ARet program and Energy Star metrics, assuming zero electric interactive effects and no free ridership due to low participation. Net savings estimates were 200% of ENSC-tracked values, with a recommendation to validate Energy Star qualifications in tracking sheets.

(11) Performance Plus Program (PP) p. p. 5
(11) Performance Plus Program (PP) The Performance Plus Program is the residential new houses program. It provides financial incentives to homeowners and builders to exceed the energy efficiency requirements of the building code. Modeling...

AI summary The Performance Plus Program (PP) incentivizes residential new homes to exceed building code energy efficiency. Econoler adjusted EnerGuide baselines and savings estimates, citing studies. Free-ridership was 42%, with 5% market effect. Four recommendations include expanding builder interviews, integrating HOT2000 data, random model revisions, and tracking electric heating percentages for accurate EnerGuide calculations.

(13) Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) p. p. 5
(13) Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) Smart Lighting Choices is an upstream lighting program that is designed to produce market transformation in the non-residential lighting sector by working through lighting distributors to buy down...

AI summary The Smart Lighting Choices Program (SLC) is an upstream initiative reducing non-residential lighting costs via distributor incentives. It includes the Upstream Business Energy Rebates (BER) subprogram. Evaluation highlights 19% free-ridership, 0.81 Net-to-Gross, and -7.7% interactive effect. Recommendations include standardizing distributor invoices and conducting customer surveys to improve evaluation accuracy.

E-6Net-to-Gross Evaluation Methodology Report with Appendix A - Presentation to PDWG 4 passages
1.10 New Houses – Performance Plus p. p. 10
1.10 New Houses – Performance Plus The Performance Plus program encourages builders and homeowners to make better energy efficiency choices for their new house. Rebates are based on the final EnerGuide rating of the house and on energy eff...

AI summary The Performance Plus program incentivizes energy efficiency in new homes through rebates tied to final EnerGuide ratings and energy-efficient product installations, encouraging builders and homeowners to adopt higher efficiency standards.

2.2 Prescriptive Retrofit – Business Energy Rebates p. p. 12
2.2 Prescriptive Retrofit – Business Energy Rebates The Business Energy Rebates program offers incentives and financing for energy efficient equipment, including lighting, refrigeration, compressed air, HVAC, high efficiency motors and var...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates program provides incentives and financing for energy-efficient equipment in Nova Scotia, including lighting, refrigeration, HVAC, and motors. It aims to support businesses in adopting technologies that reduce energy consumption.

2.4 Custom – Retrofit and New Construction p. p. 13
2.4 Custom – Retrofit and New Construction The Custom program offers incentives and financing for energy efficient equipment including compressed air, industrial processes, refrigeration, motors, lighting and other electrical end-uses. The...

AI summary The Custom program provides incentives and financing for energy-efficient equipment in sectors like industrial processes and lighting. Participation requires a feasibility study and a measurement and verification (M&V) plan. Free-ridership is anticipated to be low due to these process requirements.

Commercial & Industrial Programs p. pp. 17-18
Commercial & Industrial Programs - ›Prescriptive – Business Energy Rebates - ›Prescriptive – Smart Lighting Choices - ›Custom - ›Small Business Energy Solutions

AI summary The section outlines four commercial and industrial energy programs, including prescriptive rebates, smart lighting choices, custom solutions, and small business energy initiatives.

E-7ENSC (Avon) Responses to IR-1 to IR-27 (REDACTED) 3 passages
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
NON-CONFIDENTIAL $\mathbf{C}$ A В Participation Estimated Number of Total Rate 2013 Units/Participants/ Eligible Facilities (C=B/A)Customers Efficient Products Rebates (Residential) 450,000 93,989 (U) N/A\ 415,000 Existing Residential 0.51...

AI summary The text provides participation and eligibility data for various energy efficiency programs, including residential and BNI (Business, Non-profit and Institutional) efficient products rebates, custom incentives, and direct installation initiatives, along with estimated numbers of participants and units involved.

Section 10
Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC Avon IR-3 Page 2 of 8 В $\mathbf{C}$ A Estimated Participation Number of Total Rate 2015 Units/Participants/ Eligible Facilities (C=B/A)Customers Efficient Products Rebates (Residential) 179,337 (U) 460,000...

AI summary The document provides an overview of estimated participation numbers for various energy efficiency programs, including residential and BNI (Business, Non-profit and Institutional) efficient products rebates, home energy reports, and direct installation initiatives. It outlines the number of participants, eligible facilities, and percentages of participation across different categories.

2010 Prescriptive (U) Custom (F) Small Business Energy Solutions (F) Efficient Products - Direct Install (F)
2010 Prescriptive (U) Custom (F) Small Business Energy Solutions (F) Efficient Products - Direct Install (F) Residential/Charitable - 19 108 2,079 Small General 1 7 245 1,605 General Demand 153,382 49 420 1,427 Large General 148,584 3 - 49...

AI summary The text presents data on energy usage and programs related to energy efficiency, including residential, commercial, and industrial categories, with a focus on rebates and energy solutions in Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2012.

E-7(r)ENSC (Avon) Responses to IR-1 to IR-27 (REVISED) (REDACTED) 2 passages
\ ENSC budgets at the program level, not the program component level. This table therefore reflects Table 3 from Econoler's report (p. 4).
\ ENSC budgets at the program level, not the program component level. This table therefore reflects Table 3 from Econoler's report (p. 4). 1 Request IR-3: 2 3 Reference: ENSC Evidence, 2013 – 2015 DSM Plan. 4 5 a) Please provide the "DSM T...

AI summary The document requests detailed participation rates for ENSC's 2013–2015 DSM Plan, specifically for residential and BNI programs. It also asks for a breakdown of participation by NSPI customer rate classes and historical data from 2008–2012. The response provides estimated participation rates and customer data.

- 2 Repository.
- 2 Repository. 1 Request IR-10: 14 programs' TRC values are most likely to be affected by the dual baseline approach? 15 16 Response IR-11: 17 18 a) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 1, filed electronically. 19 20 b) Over the three-...

AI summary The response discusses the impact of the dual baseline approach on the TRC values of energy efficiency programs. It notes that the Energy Savings Actions program has a TRC of 1.0 over three years, with assumptions about measure life and avoided capacity costs affecting the calculation. ENSC acknowledges that their TRC method may need to evolve and references consulting Dunsky Energy Consulting for insights on other jurisdictions' methods.

E-16ENSC (Multeese) Responses to IR-12 to IR-14 1 passage
Section 26 p. p. 19
he equation for TRC costs, which included at that time a "participant cost" (PCt) term, 3 and then "suggest[s] 1 D.06-06-063, mimeo ., p. 67. 2 D.92-12-050, 47 CPUC 2d, p. 73. 3 Standard Practice Manual: Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Ma...

AI summary The 2007 SPM Clarification Memo discusses the evolution of TRC cost equations, clarifying that the NTG ratio applies to participants' out-of-pocket costs and rebate incentives but excludes administrative costs. It contrasts rebate programs (removing revenue requirements for free riders) with direct install programs (including incentives in costs). Key references include the 1987 SPM and prior memos.

E-25Evidence of Canadian Oil Heat Association - Nova Scotia 1 passage
18 Q. How has the oil heat industry responded to the Action Plan? p. pp. 8-10
18 Q. How has the oil heat industry responded to the Action Plan? A. Firstly, the oil heat industry has never been contacted by ENSC to discuss ways to19 implement reductions for our industry. COHA was contracted by its predecessor, Conser...

AI summary The oil heat industry states ENSC did not engage them on GHG reduction strategies. COHA-NS administered rebate programs like 'Retire Your Furnace' and 'EEFI', upgrading ~7,000 appliances, reducing oil imports and GHG emissions. Industry claims these efforts demonstrate their capacity for energy efficiency and emissions reduction.

E-28Proof of Advertising 1 passage
Good news for budget p. p. 3
Good news for budget By JULIAN BELTRAME The Canadian Press OTTAWA — Finance Minister Jim Flaherty faces a less bumpy road in seeking to balance the budget in four years, according to economists who briefed the minister Monday in advance of...

AI summary Finance Minister Jim Flaherty faces a more manageable path to balancing the budget, with economists noting reduced global risks and increased optimism about the U.S. economy. Statistics Canada reports highlight financial challenges, including a fragile global economy, while a Local Program Improvement Fund is mentioned as a funding initiative. The public broadcaster is reviewing options to address financial pressures.

09517Board Order 1 passage
16. ENSC and COHA-NS agree that:
16. ENSC and COHA-NS agree that: - a) COHA-NS will be recognized as a stakeholder in future proposed DSM programs and that oil heat options will be considered for inclusion in energy efficiency and conservation programs; and - b) Outside t...

AI summary ENSC and COHA-NS agree to recognize COHA-NS as a stakeholder in future DSM programs, including oil heat options, and to engage provincial representatives on incentives for high-efficiency condensing oil heating furnaces outside electricity ratepayer programs.

08970Canadian Oil Heat Association - Nova Scotia (ENSC) IR-1 to IR-4 1 passage
COHA IR-3:
COHA IR-3: ENSC is forecasting energy savings attributed to the province adopting new energy efficiency codes and standards (p.22, Evidence, ENSC 2013-2015 DSM Filin g). ENSC supports and builds DSM programs around the new Nova Scotia resi...

AI summary ENSC forecasts energy savings from Nova Scotia's 2010 residential building code requiring EnerGuide 80 compliance. Questions challenge whether ENSC's DSM program adapts to EnerGuide80, uses HOT2000 software, and if HOT2000 incentivizes electric heat installation, conflicting with DSM goals. Concerns include potential biases in performance-based rating systems and rebate structures.

120092013 Annual Progress Report 3 passages
1.3 Business, Non-Profit and Institutional Sector Results p. p. 0
1.3 Business, Non-Profit and Institutional Sector Results The Small Business Direct Install program includes the former Small Business Energy Solutions program, the former Commercial Direct Install program component, and an LED Retail init...

AI summary Nova Scotia's energy efficiency programs achieved significant energy savings in 2012. The Small Business Direct Install program exceeded its target, while the Prescriptive Rebates program expanded offerings and increased savings. The Custom program, including EMIS and EEM initiatives, achieved 33.6 GWh savings. EEMs were deployed across multiple organizations, identifying over 10 GWh in potential savings.

4.1.2 Existing Residential p. p. 0
4.1.2 Existing Residential ENSC's Existing Residential program consists of services focused on building envelope retrofits, direct installation of low-cost energy-efficient technologies, and rebates for installation of larger energy-effici...

AI summary ENSC's Existing Residential program offers building retrofits, direct installations, and rebates. In 2013, ENSC will enhance services with zero-interest financing and marketing. The Green Heat program shifts focus to renewable energy (wood/pellets) and excludes natural gas/propane. Low-income and medium-income assistance continues with targeted outreach.

4.2.2 Custom Incentives p. p. 0
4.2.2 Custom Incentives The Custom program, consisting of customized energy solutions for both new building construction and building retrofits, will focus on providing a wider range of options in 2013. A "Custom Lite" service is in develo...

AI summary ENSC's Custom program expands in 2013 with 'Custom Lite' and Energy Auditing Service to reduce barriers for BNI customers. Re-commissioning services and strategic planning for large accounts are introduced. The New Construction component focuses on market transformation via operational cost emphasis and adapting to the updated Model National Energy Code for Buildings (MNECB).

120102012 DSM Evaluation Reports 43 passages
Table 3: 2012 On-Site Visits p. p. 10
Table 3: 2012 On-Site Visits On-Site Visits Completed in 2012 Program Participant Sites Retailer Stores Recycler Appliance Retirement (ARet) 3 1 Instant Savings 20 Home Energy Assessment (HEA) 2 Fuel Substitution 8 Low Income Homeowner Ser...

AI summary Table 3 presents the number of on-site visits completed in 2012 across various energy efficiency and appliance retirement programs in Nova Scotia, including details on participant sites, retailer stores, and recyclers involved in these initiatives.

Business Energy Rebates p. pp. 21-22
Business Energy Rebates For the mail-in rebate component of BER, the net energy and demand savings evaluated for 2012 were slightly lower than those tracked by ENSC, respectively by 7 percent and 3 percent. This could mainly be explained b...

AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy and demand savings for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program in 2012. Mail-in rebates showed slightly lower savings than tracked by ENSC, while instant rebates showed higher savings. Adjustments, diversity factors, and NTGR values were used to refine the estimates of savings.

Preamble p. pp. 25-150
b In 2012, NC was evaluated as a separate program. Before 2012, it was evaluated with Custom Retrofit. & lt;sup>c BER includes the mail-in rebate component and the instant rebate component (previously known as Smart Lighting Choices). d BE...

AI summary In 2012, Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) restructured its Demand-Side Management (DSM) program portfolio, including the integration of pilot projects such as Fuel Substitution and MURB, and the rebranding of programs like EnerGuide for Existing Houses to HEA. The residential sector's contribution to energy savings increased, and new programs like RDI were introduced to expand coverage.

Table 20: Recommendations for Performance Plus p. p. 46
Table 20: Recommendations for Performance Plus No. Recommendations PP-R2. Simplify the incentive table: The incentive table included in the program manual should be significantly simplified, since the incentives will be managed through ENS...

AI summary The document recommends simplifying the incentive table in the Performance Plus program manual, as incentives will be managed through ENSC based on EnerGuide ratings. It suggests replacing the 'pay in full' note with a shared cost structure of $300 from both the homeowner and ENSC for assessment costs.

4.2.1 Business Energy Rebates p. pp. 54-55
4.2.1 Business Energy Rebates The 2012 evaluation of BER demonstrated that the program had undergone a series of changes, creating an intensified impact on the market. In fact, BER has grown in both range and scale, expanding from offering...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program has expanded significantly since 2011, offering instant rebates through distributors and incorporating new eligible measures. It has improved program promotion, communication, and management tools, leading to increased awareness and satisfaction. The program achieved notable energy and demand savings in 2012. However, some distributors noted that other programs offered higher incentives for certain products, which may have limited BER's impact.

Table 24: Recommendations for Business Energy Rebates p. pp. 55-57
Table 24: Recommendations for Business Energy Rebates No. Recommendations BER-R1. Analyze product offering to reduce duplicate rebates and program overlapping in the market: Some eligible measures covered by the BER instant rebate approach...

AI summary The text discusses the need to analyze and adjust the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program to avoid duplicate rebates and program overlap with other BNI programs like BES and Custom Retrofit. It highlights that 37% of T8 lamps and 48% of ballasts eligible for BER instant rebates are already covered by other programs, suggesting a need to limit BER rebates to products with low market penetration, such as LED technologies.

p. p. 58
No. Recommendations BER-R9. Include interactive effects in calculating the tracked savings of all the indoor lighting products sold through the instant rebate approach: For the lighting measures implemented through the mail-in rebate appro...

AI summary The recommendation suggests adjusting tracked savings calculations for indoor lighting products sold through the instant rebate approach by including an interactive effects factor of -15.5 percent. This adjustment aims to improve the accuracy of savings calculations, similar to how interactive effects were already considered in mail-in rebate approaches.

RECOMMENDATIONS p. pp. 72-93
RECOMMENDATIONS Econoler finds that the program works well overall and at a satisfactory level. In addition to the general recommendations presented for all ENSC programs in the overall executive summary of the 2012 demand-side management...

AI summary Econoler recommends continuing marketing efforts, exploring rebate adjustments, collecting more detailed appliance data, and pursuing metering activities for the ARet program to improve its effectiveness and accuracy in calculating energy savings.

3.5.7 Program Influence p. p. 116
3.5.7 Program Influence Participants were asked to rate the importance of various factors in their decision to retire an appliance through the program on a scale of '1' to '10', where '10' is extremely important. The removal and recycling...

AI summary Participants rated the importance of factors influencing appliance retirement through a program. Removal and recycling services were most valued, followed by information/advice and monetary incentives. The Evaluator suggests that the rebate amount could be reconsidered in future evaluations.

Financial p. p. 154
Financial - 6. (Reduce energy/electricity costs) - 7. (Rebate/incentive) - 8. (Cost too much to have it picked up) - 9. (Did not want to pay disposal fee at dump/recycling center) - 10. (Reduce maintenance costs/appliance needed repairs)

AI summary The text outlines several reasons related to financial considerations, including reducing energy and electricity costs, receiving rebates or incentives, concerns about high costs, and avoiding disposal fees at recycling centers, as well as reducing maintenance and repair costs for appliances.

Same [SKIP TO W3] p. p. 63
Same [SKIP TO W3] Lower Higher [SKIP TO W3] Don't know [SKIP TO W3] Refused [SKIP TO W3] W2a. By what percentage do you estimate your stores' sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers would have been lower during the spring campaign if the reb...

AI summary The question asks for an estimate of the percentage decrease in sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers during a spring campaign if the rebate had not been available.

3.6.1 Perceptions Related to Program Changes p. pp. 116-117
3.6.1 Perceptions Related to Program Changes A total of five DAs and two EAs were interviewed for the evaluation of HEA. The program partners were questioned about the recent changes made to the program and their impact on their work. Opin...

AI summary The evaluation of the Heat Energy Assistance (HEA) program reveals mixed satisfaction among partners, with dissatisfaction linked to frequent changes, lack of financial commitment, and unclear messaging. Key concerns include rebate amounts, the 12-month timeline, and the removal of incentives for heating equipment, which has decreased program activities. Improved communication between ENSC and DAs is recommended.

Recommendation p. pp. 28-30
Recommendation Upon the review of existing programs that include a rebate on ductless mini-split heat pumps, the feedback from distributors in Nova Scotia and the results from the HEA participant survey, the Evaluator has the following rec...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends reintroducing a rebate for high-efficiency ductless mini-split heat pumps in Nova Scotia, based on distributor feedback and HEA survey results. Distributors believe a rebate would encourage the installation of quality heat pumps, and the program should only cover units with a Tier 2 ENERGY STAR rating to ensure higher efficiency and reduce free-ridership.

Table 27: Reasons for Participating - Builder p. p. 170
Table 27: Reasons for Participating - Builder 2012 (%) Reasons for Participating Most Important Motivation Second Most Important Motivation Sample Size 42 42 To get rebates for measures that we were already planning 38% 19% We were interes...

AI summary The table shows that the primary motivation for builders participating in energy efficiency programs is to receive rebates for measures they were already planning, followed by an interest in building more energy-efficient homes. Other motivations include cost savings for buyers, marketing appeal, and compliance with building codes.

This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. p. p. 192
This Appendix presents all recommendations made by the Evaluator throughout the report as well as the sections where the recommendations originated. Sections Recommendations 2. Simplify the incentive table : The incentive table in the prog...

AI summary The appendix outlines a recommendation to simplify the incentive table in the program manual, as incentives will be managed through ENSC based on EnerGuide ratings. The recommendation includes replacing the 'pay in full' note with the specific amounts required from both the homeowner and ENSC for assessment costs.

BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION 2012 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION p. pp. 60-62
BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION 2012 EFFICIENCY NOVA SCOTIA CORPORATION Final Report March 7, 2013

AI summary This document presents the final report of the Business Energy Rebates Impact and Process Evaluation conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation in 2012. It outlines the evaluation of business energy rebate programs and their impact on energy efficiency and process improvements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY p. p. 68
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2012 process and impact evaluation of Business Energy Rebates (BER), also known as the Prescriptive Rebate program. The 2012 evaluation was based on in-depth interviews with the Pro...

AI summary This report evaluates the 2012 Business Energy Rebates (BER) program through interviews with the Program Manager, distributors, on-site visits, and a survey of rebate participants, assessing its process and impact.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW p. pp. 68-69
PROGRAM OVERVIEW BER provides financial incentives in the form of prescriptive rebates to business, non-profit and institutional (BNI) clients to encourage reduction of electrical energy consumption and demand. Since its start, BER has off...

AI summary The Business Energy Rebates (BER) program provides prescriptive rebates to BNI clients to reduce electrical energy consumption and demand. In 2012, the program was expanded to include instant rebates and new eligible measures such as commercial kitchen and agricultural equipment. The program aimed for 14.9 GWh in electricity savings and 2.9 MW in demand savings.

KEY FINDINGS p. p. 69
KEY FINDINGS The evaluation of BER demonstrated that the mail-in rebate approach had a total of 175 participants in 2012, which is a considerable increase compared to the previous years (106 participants in 2011 and 13 participants in 2010...

AI summary The evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program showed a significant increase in participants and energy savings from 2010 to 2012, with the mail-in rebate approach and instant rebate approach both contributing to higher net energy savings in 2012 compared to previous years.

Awareness p. p. 69
Awareness Program awareness constitutes an important aspect of the program strategy in terms of keeping the number of participants on the rise and ensuring program continuity in the years to come. The evaluation has revealed that the main...

AI summary The evaluation highlights that ENSC's communication efforts, along with contractors and word of mouth, are key drivers of program awareness for the BER mail-in rebate approach. ENSC's intensified promotion in 2012 has been effective, and contractors play a significant role in program promotion and implementation.

Impact on the Market p. p. 70
Impact on the Market With regard to the instant rebate approach, many distributors noticed, on one hand, that program advertising activities had a good impact on their sales of LED lighting systems. On the other hand, according to some dis...

AI summary The instant rebate approach under the BER program had a weaker impact on the sales of T8 lamps and ballasts compared to other BNI programs, which offered higher incentives. Many distributors noted that other programs, such as Business Energy Solutions (BES) and Custom Retrofit, were more effective in driving sales, even though energy savings were counted only once.

Section 1984 p. p. 71
Overall, the evaluation revealed that BER generated net energy savings of 21.858 GWh and demand savings of 6.285 MW at the generator in 2012.

AI summary The evaluation found that the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program achieved net energy savings of 21.858 GWh and demand savings of 6.285 MW at the generator in 2012.

2.2.4 On-Site Visits p. p. 78
2.2.4 On-Site Visits In the fall 2012, 50 on-site visits were conducted at the facilities of some participants who applied for a mail-in rebate under BER. These visits were conducted by Econoler's subcontractor, Equilibrium Engineering. Th...

AI summary In the fall of 2012, 50 on-site visits were conducted by Equilibrium Engineering, a subcontractor of Econoler, to verify the proper implementation of energy efficiency measures for participants in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program. Information such as equipment characteristics and operational conditions were validated during these visits.

2.2.5 Participant Survey p. pp. 78-79
2.2.5 Participant Survey A telephone survey with a total of 56 mail-in rebate participants was conducted by Econoler's subcontractor, Corporate Research Associates, Inc. (CRA), from its offices in Halifax. The interviews were conducted in...

AI summary A telephone survey was conducted with 56 mail-in rebate participants to gather feedback on the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, focusing on free-ridership, program awareness, participant motivations, and satisfaction. The survey was carried out in 2012 using CATI technology and lasted an average of 13 minutes.

3.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE PROCESS EVALUATION p. p. 80
3.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE PROCESS EVALUATION In 2011, Econoler performed a comprehensive process evaluation of the BER program. The 2010 evaluation report and recommendations, the program manual and website, the application forms,...

AI summary In 2011, Econoler conducted a process evaluation of the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, examining various program elements and generating recommendations. The 2012 evaluation continues this process, focusing on follow-up recommendations, updated documentation, and perspectives from program partners and participants.

Table 4: Program Manual Content - BER p. p. 82
Table 4: Program Manual Content - BER Program Manual Content 2011 2012 Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives Eligibility criteria Program partners a...

AI summary Table 4 outlines the Program Manual Content for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including sections such as program description, eligibility criteria, incentives, and evaluation plans. The table is empty for the years 2011 and 2012, indicating that no data was provided for these years.

3.5.3 Motivations and Barriers to Participation p. p. 92
3.5.3 Motivations and Barriers to Participation The most important motivation for over one-half of those participating in BER was to save on energy costs (55%), while for two in ten the most important motivation was to take advantage of th...

AI summary Over half of participants in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program were motivated by energy cost savings, while 20% were motivated by incentives and rebates. These were also the top two motivations for participation.

Section 2041 p. p. 94
To satisfy the most important motivational elements for participating in BER and for installing energyefficient equipment, program activities, promotional literature and advertising materials should continue to focus on energy savings and...

AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of focusing on energy savings and cost reductions in the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program to motivate participation and equipment installation. It also highlights that contractors and vendors play a significant role in program awareness and implementation, with company employees and contractors being the primary individuals responsible for specifying energy efficiency measures.

3.5.7 Participant Recommendations for Improvements p. p. 99
3.5.7 Participant Recommendations for Improvements In terms of suggestions for improving BER, one in ten participants recommended that more information be provided (11%) or that there be better program marketing or awareness (11%). Other r...

AI summary Participants suggested improvements to the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program, including better information provision, increased marketing, more user-friendly forms, and rebating more measures. These recommendations were made by approximately 11% or fewer of the participants.

4.2 GROSS SAVINGS p. pp. 102-103
4.2 GROSS SAVINGS For the year of 2012, the tracking sheet provided for the mail-in rebate contains a total of 295 projects completed by 175 participants and covering 7 different categories of measures. The gross savings estimations presen...

AI summary The 2012 gross savings evaluation for the Business Energy Rebates (BER) program involved reviewing 295 projects across 7 categories using the BER – Measure Equations Tool and 50 on-site visits. Adjustments were made based on discrepancies between recorded and calculated savings, especially related to hours of operation and equipment specifications.

4.2.2 Lighting Measures p. p. 106
type of lamp or a minimum level of wattage, the Evaluator recommends that participants be required to provide a photograph of the lamps and/or fixtures they intend to replace before uninstalling them. In addition, the projects in which the...

AI summary The Evaluator recommends requiring participants to provide photographs of lamps and fixtures before replacement to ensure compliance with the BER program. Issues arose when customers did not purchase products at participating stores, and the Evaluator suggests including certain LED products in the mail-in rebate portion to improve eligibility control.

Table 21: Diversity Factors for Mail-In Rebate p. p. 110
Table 21: Diversity Factors for Mail-In Rebate Category of Measure 2012 Diversity Factor HVAC 100% Lighting 97% Refrigeration 100% Motors and Drives 93% Compressed Air 65% Agricultural Equipment 85% Commercial Kitchen Equipment 97% Corresp...

AI summary Table 21 presents diversity factors for various categories of measures under the Mail-In Rebate program, with percentages ranging from 65% for Compressed Air to 100% for HVAC and Refrigeration. The table also notes that the 97% diversity factor for Commercial Kitchen Equipment corresponds to a weighted average calculated for each project visited.

Section 2080 p. pp. 110-111
Energy and demand savings for the program were revised to include the adjustments presented in the sections above. Using the diversity factors calculated for each category, the peak demand was established. Savings at the generator level we...

AI summary The document revises energy and demand savings for the BER program, using diversity factors and line loss factors to calculate peak demand and savings at both the meter and generator levels. Total gross energy and demand savings are estimated at specific figures.

5.2 GROSS SAVINGS p. pp. 117-118
5.2 GROSS SAVINGS Gross savings for the instant rebate approach were reviewed by the Evaluator based on the total number of products sold and their associated savings. The different categories of products eligible for an instant rebate wer...

AI summary The document outlines the methodology for calculating gross savings for the instant rebate approach, including product categories, unitary savings values, and adjustments to avoid double counting with other programs. It highlights the distribution of T8 lamps and HP ballasts and the exclusion of higher-value rebates from other programs.

CONCLUSION p. pp. 140-141
CONCLUSION The 2012 evaluation of BER demonstrated that the program had undergone a series of changes, creating an intensified impact on the market. In fact, BER has grown in both range and scale, expanding from offering only mail-in rebat...

AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Building Energy Rebate (BER) program showed significant improvements in its range, scale, and impact since the 2011 evaluation. The program expanded to include instant rebates and new equipment categories, and ENSC implemented key recommendations. Net energy savings and demand savings increased substantially in 2012, though some distributors noted competition from other BNI programs.

DISTRIBUTOR INTERVIEW GUIDE ENSC BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES PROGRAM p. p. 148
DISTRIBUTOR INTERVIEW GUIDE ENSC BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES PROGRAM October 29, 2012 Hello, may I please speak with_______________? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY "Perhaps you can help me anyway." GO TO INTRODUCTION] INTRODUCTION Hell...

AI summary This document is an interview guide for the Business Energy Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It outlines the process for contacting and interviewing individuals responsible for stocking and managing rebatable products such as T8 lamps, LED lighting systems, and electronic ballasts.

High-performance electronic ballasts p. p. 150
High-performance electronic ballasts I have a few questions about your sales of high-performance electronic ballasts for T8 lamps that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. Our records indicate that your total sales of high-...

AI summary The text asks about the sales of high-performance electronic ballasts for T8 lamps promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program, specifically inquiring if there is a significant difference (plus or minus 25%) between sales in 2012 (expected) and 2011.

Section 2173 p. p. 150
E1. If the current trend is maintained, your total sales for high-performance ballasts in 2012 will be significantly lower/higher ( select the appropriate term ) than for the previous year. Is there any reason for this change? [PROBE: mark...

AI summary The text asks about potential changes in sales of high-performance ballasts in 2012, considering market trends and the impact of the Business Energy Rebates Program. It inquires whether sales would have been lower without the incentive provided by the program.

RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% p. pp. 150-152
RECORD PERCENTAGE ___% E4. In 2012, how important would you say the incentive from the Business Energy Rebates Program was in customers' decision to purchase high-performance ballasts instead of standard electronic ballasts? Please give yo...

AI summary The text asks respondents to evaluate the importance of the Business Energy Rebates Program's incentive in influencing customer purchases of high-performance ballasts, the likelihood of continued purchases if the program ended, and whether the current incentive amount is appropriate.

LED lighting systems p. p. 151
LED lighting systems I have a few questions about your sales of LED lighting systems that are promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program. By LED lighting systems, we mean LED screw-in bulbs and LED recessed downlights. L2. In 2012, th...

AI summary The text discusses questions about the sales of LED lighting systems promoted by the Business Energy Rebates Program, specifically asking whether the incentive provided in 2012 affected sales volume.

3.4 CONSULTANT PERSPECTIVES p. pp. 29-30
3.4 CONSULTANT PERSPECTIVES Two consultants were interviewed as part of the Custom Retrofit evaluation to understand their involvement in the program, their participation process, as well as their perception of and satisfaction with the pr...

AI summary Two consultants were interviewed about their experience with the Custom Retrofit program. They found the participation process easy but noted issues with lighting forms and long wait times for incentives. While satisfied with marketing and staff relationships, opinions were split on overall satisfaction, with one consultant expressing concern about the impact of Business Energy Rebates (BER) on their business and suggesting financial support for fuel/gas/propane savings measures.

FR2a. the program? implemented exactly the same energy efficiency measures that you implemented through p. pp. 71-73
FR2a. the program? implemented exactly the same energy efficiency measures that you implemented through Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused FR2b. installed standard equipment instead of energy-efficient equipment? Response 98 Don't Know 99 R...

AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to the implementation of energy efficiency measures and financial incentives provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It explores scenarios where these programs were not available and asks respondents to evaluate the likelihood of implementing similar measures without incentives.

PA1 Score: p. p. 80
PA1 Score: MEAN VALUE OF: (FR2a ; FR2b) IF PRE-SCREENING: 0% FR1. Before participating in the program, did your company have plans to implement the specific energy efficiency measures that were implemented through the program? IF 1. Yes: U...

AI summary This section outlines a scoring methodology for evaluating energy efficiency programs. It asks whether companies had pre-existing plans to implement energy efficiency measures and whether they would have financed projects without financial incentives or onbill financing from ENSC.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →