ce - of, let's say, 180 million, we would then move that into a - FAM liability or a credit to customers, an amount owing to - customers of $34.5 million. - MS. McNAMARA: Okay. And I have some - INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the transfer of regulatory assets related to coal thermal assets, the treatment of income tax for a limited partnership (LP), and the allocation of depreciation and interest expenses between Nova Scotia Power and the LP. The parties are clarifying how income tax arises for the LP and whether it is offset by deductions in Nova Scotia Power.
ext slide, so we - have up front financing costs. We also do have some - ongoing financing costs. - Again, some of these would be similar - to what we've seen in other proceedings. So the allotted - fees, this limited partnership will requ...
AI summary The text outlines financing and tax considerations related to a limited partnership structure, including upfront and ongoing financing costs, servicing fees, and income tax implications. These costs include audit fees, rating agency fees, and administrative expenses, with servicing fees calculated as 0.05% of a billion-dollar bond issuance. Income tax is discussed in relation to the return of capital and customer savings.
- on the equity component, so there's no income to pay tax - on in the securitization structure. - The last thing I wanted to highlight - here. We don't have any income tax in year one costs, and - so that's because although the limited pa...
AI summary The discussion focuses on the tax implications of a limited partnership structure in the context of a securitization transaction. It explains that while the limited partnership may generate taxable income, Nova Scotia Power intends to shelter this income using existing tax attributes, thereby deferring tax collection until a combined entity basis is applied.