- on a comparison between the IRP Scenario 2.0C with Base-DSM, and with No-DSM, shown in 6,
AI summary The text references a comparison between IRP Scenario 2.0C with Base-DSM and No-DSM, as shown in figure 6, highlighting the impact of demand-side management on the integrated resource plan.
4 Table 7: Full Range of Avoided Cost Values Used for This Analysis Category Years Details 2011-2014 • 79 $/kW-yr • 2009 IRP refresh (levelized over 2010-2032) Capacity 2015-2022 • 197 $/kW-yr • 2014 IRP, Base DSM scenario (levelized over...
AI summary Table 7 presents avoided cost values for capacity, transmission, distribution, energy, and carbon across different time periods. Values are based on studies like the 2009 and 2014 IRP, and calculations provided by NS Power for the DSMAG. Carbon costs are based on federal trajectories and emissions intensity.
Appendix D: Assumptions
AI summary Appendix D outlines key assumptions for a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, referencing acronyms related to energy management, cost studies, and regulatory applications. It provides context for terms like DSM, COSS, and RBIA, which are central to the proceeding's analysis.
EOne Response In response to Synapse's comments about the rate classes with higher rate increases, EOne stated that it seeks to maximize participation to provide bill savings from DSM to offset rate impacts and that it will work towards th...
AI summary EOne responds to Synapse's comments by supporting the inclusion of a 'no-DSM' case in the 2020 IRP Update and engaging DSMAG. It emphasizes DSM's role in offsetting rate increases through participation and program design, agrees to refine the RBIA model, and cites NS Power's IRP modeling practices comparing DSM with other clean energy resources.
5. AVOIDED COSTS - Synapse asserted that, "a "no DSM" case is necessary for accurate R&BIA modeling. NSPI is in the - process of updating the 2020 IRP to reflect the impacts of recently adopted legislation and other - changes. As part of t...
AI summary Synapse argues a 'no DSM' case is essential for accurate R&BIA modeling, requesting NSPI updates to the 2020 IRP and DSMAG involvement. NS Power states it will analyze DSM scenarios and calculate avoided costs post-Evergreen IRP, not within its scope. E1 supports Synapse's request for a 'no-DSM' case and DSMAG engagement.
6. COST OF CARBON - Synapse stated, "We emphasize the need for discussion and analysis of the impacts of the - adoption of Act 57 on DSM and other clean energy investment planning. We also note that DSM - planning needs to be integrated wi...
AI summary Synapse emphasizes the need to integrate DSM planning with other clean energy resources and requests data from NSPI. NS Power responds that their IRP process already integrates DSM, citing the 2020 IRP and Evergreen modeling. E1 supports the integration approach. The discussion centers on clean energy resource planning and data transparency.
EOne Response In response to Synapse's comments about the rate classes with higher rate increases, EOne stated that it seeks to maximize participation to provide bill savings from DSM to offset rate impacts and that it will work towards th...
AI summary EOne supports Synapse's requests to include a 'no-DSM' case in the 2020 IRP Update and engage DSMAG on IRP development. It emphasizes DSM's role in offsetting rate increases through customer engagement and program design. EOne agrees to refine the RBIA model, clarify scenarios, and align with NS Power on DSM comparisons with clean energy resources. It also aligns with Synapse and the CA on reducing historical RBIA filings.
Conclusion The Board accepts the 2022 RBIA report as filed and acknowledges improvements in the model that were achieved through collaborative work by stakeholders who participated in the DSMAG. The avoided cost of carbon is a new stream o...
AI summary The Board accepts the 2022 RBIA report, noting improvements from stakeholder collaboration, including EOne's integration of avoided carbon costs leading to lower rate increases. Synapse requested a no-DSM scenario and clean energy integration, which EOne supported. The Board directed NS Power to enhance IRP scenarios and model transparency, with EOne committing to continuous improvements and a change log for models.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →