Topic:"Integrated Resource Plan" in M08888

EfficiencyOne Response to DSMAG Comments on VEIC Report on Measure-Level Non-Energy Benefits December 18, 2017 Page 2 of 27

AI summary EfficiencyOne responds to DSMAG's comments on the VEIC report analyzing non-energy benefits of energy efficiency measures. The document addresses program-level cost considerations, including TRC, PAC, and IRP frameworks, while engaging with DSMAG's feedback on benefit quantification methodologies.

(2) Whether the non-energy impacts should be treated uniformly across programs

AI summary The proceeding examines whether non-energy impacts (NEIs) should be uniformly evaluated across demand-side management programs. Key considerations include TRC methodology, program administrator costs (PAC), and the role of NEB in IRP frameworks.

Attachment 3: DSMAG NEBs Presentation – June 27, 2018 Date Filed: September 19, 2018

AI summary Attachment 3 from a June 27, 2018 DSMAG NEBs presentation discusses Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs) in regulatory proceedings, likely involving programs like Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and considerations of Total Resource Cost (TRC), Program Administrator Cost (PAC), and Integrated Resource Planning (IRP).

Section 2.0 Introduction to Non-Energy Benefits

AI summary This section introduces non-energy benefits (NEBs) within the context of regulatory proceedings, emphasizing their role in integrated resource planning (IRP) and evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V). It highlights the importance of quantifying NEBs alongside energy-related costs for comprehensive decision-making.

of the plans seem to have the same economics; TRC of about two, PAC of about three. The corporation has not said that 158.5 is not achievable, so I don't see a good reason for not going to the 158.5. MR. FOREMAN: In fairness the evidence t...

AI summary The text discusses recommendations to maintain or increase 2012 DSM savings targets, citing 2011 achievements and the need for momentum. Efficiency Nova Scotia and Board Counsel Tim Woolf support aligning 2012 goals with 2011 levels, emphasizing flexibility and long-term IRP alignment. TRC and PAC figures are referenced as economic indicators.

ergy savings from actual DSM programs in future years. [ENSC Closing Submission, pp. 3-5] [66] ENSC acknowledged some of the concerns raised, and submitted that the proper question for the Board is: ... what evidence is on the record to su...

AI summary ENSC argues that the NSUARB should assess whether proposed DSM spending increases are justified given over-achievement of IRP targets and stakeholder opposition. The CA raises concerns about a 100% budget increase from 2010 and ENSC's operational inexperience as a new entity. ENSC emphasizes analyzing rate impacts of DSM spending.

4.4 Bill Impacts [79] In his direct evidence on behalf of Board Counsel, Mr. Woolf discussed the need to establish key principles regarding how to quantify bill and rate impacts due to increasing DSM budgets in order that these rate and bi...

AI summary The document outlines principles for quantifying bill and rate impacts from increased DSM budgets, emphasizing analysis of program participant and non-participant effects, long-term impacts, and cost-benefit considerations. The Province recommends ENSC collaborate with NSPI and PWDG to refine DSM plan filings, which ENSC agrees to.

5.4 Reporting of Energy and Demand Savings [103] The Application notes that the proposed target for the 2012 DSM Plan includes savings for ELI projects of 80 GWh in energy and 12 MW in demand. The proposed savings from the adoption of ener...

AI summary The Application proposes 2012 DSM Plan targets including 80 GWh energy and 12 MW demand savings from ELI projects, plus 10 GWh and 2.7 MW from energy codes. ENSC reports savings from ELI and code adoption, expanding beyond previous customer-funded DSM programs to align with the 2009 IRP Update.

5.1.1 Extra-Large Industrial Projects ELI customers completed efficiency projects in 2009 and 2010. The resulting energy and demand savings contribute to the IRP targets and are reported in this filing because they are incremental to custo...

AI summary ELI customers completed efficiency projects in 2009-2010, contributing 80 GWh and 12 MW in energy/demand savings to IRP targets. These conservative estimates, based on third-party investigations for ENSC, will be evaluated in 2011, with variances reported in the 2013 DSM Plan.

5.1.2 Adoption of Energy-Efficiency Codes and Standards In this filing, ENSC has reported energy savings attributed to the adoption of codes and standards from two sources: a new residential energy code and a new federal standard for gener...

AI summary ENSC reports energy savings from new residential codes and federal lamp standards in 2012, excluding NSPI initiatives in the 2012 DSM Plan but planning to include them in 2013. ENSC proposes adopting T-8 lighting standards and a national commercial energy code, citing incremental load forecast impacts from the 2009 IRP Update.

[107] Mr. Foote, in his direct evidence, stated that: Any discussion of whether to include non-program standards and at what level should not distract the UARB and stakeholders from the main purpose of this process which is to ensure spend...

AI summary Mr. Foote argues that non-program savings should be considered to justify ENSC's spending and meet energy demand and environmental targets. EAC opposes non-program savings due to DSM planning uncertainties, while Mr. Whalen and Mr. Woolf support ENSC's estimates and inclusion of industrial savings in the 2012 Plan.

- [22] The Consensus Agreement addressed a number of issues, which were identified in the Board's Final Issues List in this proceeding, and which the Board discusses below. - [23] In a number of previous decisions relating to electricity m...

AI summary The Consensus Agreement addresses issues from the Board's Final Issues List. The Board emphasizes settlement agreements' importance in electricity matters, supported by all customer classes, ensuring public interest. The process involves extensive pre-hearing evidence and stakeholder involvement.

3.5.3 Affordability [76] Having determined the parameters of a preferred plan, the Board is specifically directed by the 2014 amendments to the PUA to address the issue of affordability. The most relevant sections are Section 79L(8) and (9...

AI summary The NSUARB must address affordability under the 2014 PUA amendments, specifically Sections 79L(8) and (9), which require evaluating electricity efficiency programs' affordability for NSPI customers. Traditionally, the Board used the lowest long-term cost principle, but affordability is now a critical factor. The Board must assess whether the amendments alter DSM expenditure evaluations and if the proposed plan meets affordability criteria.

subsequent update in 2009. So I believe we filed a quote from the Terms of Reference for the 2009 IRP and it lists basically what we're trying to evaluate in doing the IRP. Bullet number three says: Develop and evaluate alternative plans i...

AI summary The 2016-18 DSM Plan aligns with the 2014 IRP's objective of minimizing costs through DSM, which saves ratepayers money and reduces emissions. The IRP's Terms of Reference (2009) emphasize evaluating alternatives using total resource cost metrics. DSM is framed as a key component of long-term energy planning, balancing economic and environmental benefits.

4.0 LETTERS OF COMMENT AND PUBLIC SPEAKERS [129] The Board received 37 letters of comment from various persons, who wrote individually or on behalf of organizations. With only two exceptions, all were supportive of E1 and maintaining the a...

AI summary The Board received 37 letters, mostly supporting E1's DSM plan, citing environmental, economic, and low-income benefits. Public speakers emphasized maintaining DSM programs and energy efficiency culture. One letter critiqued Dr. Peach's evidence, while concerns about industry capacity if spending decreases were raised.

VI CUSTOMER USAGE DATA

AI summary The section 'VI CUSTOMER USAGE DATA' outlines the context of a regulatory proceeding, including relevant acronyms and entities, but the provided text does not contain specific arguments or data.

ELECTRICITY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION

AI summary The document pertains to regulatory proceedings concerning electricity efficiency and conservation in Nova Scotia, involving entities like Efficiency Nova Scotia, Nova Scotia Power, and regulatory bodies such as the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board. Key topics include demand-side management, integrated resource planning, and legislative frameworks like the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring Act.

have to they have - no choice but to consume electricity, have less capability to deal with implementing energy - efficiency programs. Yet those who have the ability, like myself and every member of this House, - that could do a lot of our...

AI summary The text highlights disparities in demand-side management capabilities among Nova Scotians, calls for government clarity on energy initiatives, and emphasizes unaddressed opportunities like co-gen and biomass. It critiques the lack of emission reduction strategies and proposes Sydney Harbour dredging to stabilize the rate base, reducing reliance on Nova Scotia Power's rate increases.