Topic:"Integrated Resource Plan" in M09096

city-Future.pdf>](https://energy.novascotia.ca/sites/default/files/Our-Electricity-Future.pdf) at p 18. 10 Corporate Research Associates, "Autumn 2018 Atlantic Quarterly" 1 Approval of the Preferred Plan is key to ensuring Nova Scotia's go...

AI summary Nova Scotia's approval of the Preferred Plan is critical for achieving electricity efficiency goals, aligning with the Standardized Filing Framework developed by EfficiencyOne, NS Power, and stakeholders. The framework ensures consistent DSM Plan filings, balances multiple DSM aspects, and integrates with Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to guide EfficiencyOne's preferred DSM plan.

3. PREFERRED DSM PLAN

AI summary The section titled 'Preferred DSM Plan' outlines considerations for demand-side management strategies within Nova Scotia's regulatory framework. Key acronyms include DSM, EECA, HST, NSP, and IRP, though no detailed arguments or specific proposals are present in the provided text.

ntial Study, developed by 2 Navigant. The DSM Potential Study set out the achievable energy savings potential in Nova Scotia (i.e., how much DSM Nova Scotia can feasibly achieve).[16](#page-21-0) 3 4 5 One of the core outputs of the 2014 I...

AI summary The 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) identified Mid-Level Demand Side Management (DSM) as optimal for minimizing long-term electricity costs in Nova Scotia. Synapse confirmed this as part of the least-cost utility plan, while the Board emphasized the IRP's role in preventing uneconomic decisions. NSP cited affordability and near-term rate concerns, which would be addressed through DSM and ratemaking processes.

the IRP levels before 23 additional energy savings benefits are lost to Nova Scotians. Unless the energy savings 24 targets in the next 3-year DSM Plan begin to move toward the 2014 IRP levels, there 1 is little opportunity for Nova Scotia...

AI summary The text highlights that failing to adjust DSM Plan targets toward 2014 IRP levels will result in lost energy savings for Nova Scotians. It emphasizes industry trends, including diversification beyond lighting savings and increasing energy savings as a percentage of electricity generation, which support the Preferred Plan's approach despite higher costs.

"> 23 David Hill Direct Evidence February 27, 2019, page 17, lines 3-5. 24 David Hill Direct Evidence February 27, 2019, page 25, lines 22-25. 25 David Hill Direct Evidence February 27, 2019, page 8, lines 19- 21. 26 supra 27 supra Scoreca...

AI summary Nova Scotia's approved annual DSM energy savings (1.2% of generation) lag behind the national average (2%), leading to missed cost savings from the IRP. The Board's approved levels are declining, denying Nova Scotians opportunities for long-term savings.

1 4.4.2 2018 Load Forecast 2 3 NS Power's 2018 load forecast provided an outlook on the energy and peak demand requirements of in-province customers for the 2019 through 2028 period. [30](#page-28-1) 4 The load 5 forecast forms the basis f...

AI summary NS Power's 2018 load forecast outlines energy and peak demand needs for 2019–2028, relying on IRP Base-Level DSM rather than the optimal Mid-Level DSM. EfficiencyOne's Preferred Plan identifies the minimal required energy savings (130.5 GWh annually) as insufficient compared to Mid-Level DSM. The forecast underpins NS Power's fuel supply and investment planning.

1 Improving and Providing Accessibility to all Market Sectors and Rate Classes 2

AI summary The document focuses on improving accessibility across all market sectors and rate classes in Nova Scotia. Key considerations include ensuring equitable access to services, though specific details or proposals are not elaborated in the provided text.

27 6.1.1 Does the Preferred Plan align with the IRP? 28 29 The 2014 Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP") is the most recently available Preferred 30 Resource Plan and has been rigorously scrutinized and validated through the regulatory process...

AI summary The 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is the latest Preferred Resource Plan, validated through regulatory scrutiny. It outlines energy and capacity levels, with references to regulatory decisions (M06733, M05522). The alignment of the Preferred Plan with the IRP is central to the proceeding.

2.1 Key Considerations - An evidence-based approach was used to develop the Preferred Plan and was informed by the following three key considerations: - Customer Value: determine the appropriate level of energy savings; - Customer Need: de...

AI summary The Preferred Plan is developed using evidence-based approaches focusing on customer value, need, and affordability. It leverages data from NS Power's 2014 IRP, NSUARB decisions, DSM plans, and stakeholder input. The plan aims to reduce utility costs by aligning with mid-level DSM investments from Navigant's study, ensuring balanced short-term and long-term cost efficiency.

4.2.5 Program Design

AI summary The section discusses program design within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, involving entities like Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSP) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), with focus on demand-side management (DSM), cost tests (TRC, PAC), and energy efficiency initiatives. Key topics include program administration, resource cost analysis, and regulatory compliance.

5.1.2 Enhancements in 2020-2022

AI summary This section outlines enhancements implemented between 2020-2022, focusing on regulatory and programmatic developments in Nova Scotia's energy sector, including updates to demand-side management, efficiency programs, and regulatory frameworks.

e current level of DSM. Figure 1: Average Rate and Bill Impacts (2020-2035) as a Result of DSM Activities in 2020-2022 (Preferred Plan) The results in [Figure 1](#page-185-0) show that over the 16 years of the study period, rates will be a...

AI summary The analysis evaluates DSM impacts (2020-2022) on electricity rates and bills over 16 years, projecting 0.8-1.7% higher rates with DSM compared to without. The Preferred Plan offsets 5.9 GWh, reduces bills by 11% for residential customers, and saves $475M for NS Power. Model improvements include annual avoided fuel costs and line loss factors, informed by DSMAG input and the 2014 IRP's inflation assumptions.

Use of annual avoided energy costs EfficiencyOne adopted a recommendation to use annual avoided energy costs instead of levelized avoided energy costs. The annual avoided costs in this model are from the 2014 IRP and are the same figures t...

AI summary EfficiencyOne adopted a recommendation to use annual avoided energy costs from the 2014 IRP instead of levelized avoided energy costs. These annual costs are the same figures previously used to calculate levelized avoided costs, indicating a methodological shift in resource planning approaches.

Timeframe for levelization of avoided capacity costs EfficiencyOne adopted a recommendation to levelize the annual avoided capacity costs from the 2014 IRP over the RBIA study period, instead of using the levelized value from the 2014 IRP,...

AI summary EfficiencyOne adjusted the timeframe for levelizing avoided capacity costs from the 2014 IRP study period to the RBIA study period, increasing the levelized value from $195,355/MW to $195,990/MW. This change reflects a methodological shift in cost allocation over different study periods.

9 4.1 OVERALL RATE IMPACTS 10 The general trend in rates, visible in all classes, is that the avoided costs and lost 11 revenues are approximately in balance throughout the life of DSM measures; this 12 means that DSM program cost recovery...

AI summary DSM program cost recovery drives rate impacts, with small (<1.7%) average rate increases across classes from 2020-2022. Avoided costs and lost revenues balance over DSM measures' lifetimes, but annual rate effects peak during 2020-2022 before nearing zero post-2022. Figures 2-4 illustrate average impacts, annual trends, and expenditure comparisons.

22 II. Introduction and Summary

AI summary The document's 'Introduction and Summary' section outlines key acronyms and terms related to Nova Scotia's energy regulation, including demand-side management, efficiency programs, and regulatory frameworks. It sets the stage for a proceeding involving utility planning, cost tests, and stakeholder engagement.

Professional Experience

AI summary The 'Professional Experience' section lists acronyms and their expansions relevant to Nova Scotia's energy regulatory proceedings, including organizations, programs, and legislative terms. No substantive content or arguments are present in the provided text.

DDSM

AI summary The document discusses Demand-Side Management (DDSM) in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory considerations, program evaluations, and stakeholder input. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power, the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB), and various efficiency programs. Topics focus on energy conservation, cost-benefit analysis, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.

DDSM

AI summary The document discusses Demand-Side Management (DDSM) in Nova Scotia, involving regulatory considerations, program evaluations, and stakeholder input. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power, the Nova Scotia Utility and Regulatory Board (NSUARB), and various efficiency programs. Topics focus on energy conservation, cost-benefit analysis, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.

EFFICIENCYONE 2020-2022 DSM RESOURCE PLAN FILING EVIDENCE 1 Plan move towards the levels set out in the IRP, but still do not achieve the optimal 2 level. 3 4 Accordingly, the gap between customer benefits contemplated by the IRP and benef...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 DSM plan underinvests compared to the IRP's optimal levels, creating a widening gap between customer benefits and approved DSM outcomes. The text argues that insufficient funding for energy efficiency harms ratepayers and emphasizes the need for investment aligned with the IRP's targets, referencing a chart comparing UARB-approved expenditures to IRP plans.

Consider more ambitious In determining the appropriate level Please refer to the Evidence Preferred Plan with energy of energy savings for the Preferred - Section 4.1 – The 2014 savings at the 2014 Integrated Plan EfficiencyOne did rely on...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's Preferred Plan relies on the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) but exceeds the $0.24/kWh unit cost threshold. The plan's investment level was guided by maximizing energy savings, ensuring a balanced portfolio, and determining appropriate investment levels, as outlined in referenced Evidence sections.

imizing Energy Savings (customer value); 9 • Ensuring a Balanced Portfolio (customer need); and 10 • Establishing an Appropriate Investment Level (customer affordability). 11 The $27M annual investment tables show this level of investment...

AI summary The text evaluates the impact of $27M and $34M annual investments on Energy Savings, highlighting that both fall short of 2019 targets and the 2014 IRP Preferred Resource Plan. A $27M investment yields less than 100 GWh savings annually, while $34M achieves ~118 GWh, still below 2019 goals. Lower investments hinder barrier mitigation and program effectiveness.

Q. Are you familiar with the IRP and Generation Utilization and Optimization (GUO) proceedings in Nova Scotia? A. Yes.

AI summary The individual confirms familiarity with the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) and Generation Utilization and Optimization (GUO) proceedings in Nova Scotia, which involve energy planning and optimization strategies.

Q. How was DSM program potential assessed in the context of the latest IRP and GUO proceedings? A. On behalf of EfficiencyOne, Navigant conducted an analysis of DSM, i.e ., EE programs from 2015 to 2040 to support NS Power's IRP and GUO ef...

AI summary DSM program potential was assessed by Navigant for NS Power's IRP and GUO proceedings, analyzing EE programs from 2015–2040. Four scenarios (Low, Base, Mid, High) were developed using incentive levels and data from 2012 studies, surveys, and on-site collections. The 2014 report informed DSM strategies to meet provincial goals.

Q. Can you summarize how NS Power proposed to treat DSM programs in the IRP? A. Yes. NS Power proposed using a separate regulatory process outside of the IRP, i.e. , the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. 14 Consensus on the appropriate level of...

AI summary NS Power proposed using a separate regulatory process (2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan) outside the IRP for DSM programs. Stakeholders disagreed on optimal EE levels, but consensus was reached on the need to establish an adjustable optimal EE level for the IRP process, using IRP-provided data to determine resource needs.

Q. Why is critical consideration of the Mid DSM Case important in the context of these proceedings? A. It is important because EfficiencyOne continues to use the Mid DSM Case as a benchmark for assessing the reasonableness of the targets p...

AI summary EfficiencyOne uses the 2014 IRP Mid DSM Case as a benchmark for 2020-2022 DSM Plan targets, citing it as the best available data. However, the reliance on a 5-year-old study is criticized for not reflecting current energy savings realities in Nova Scotia.

of USWind and Skipjack to develop offshore wind resources to serve EDCs in Maryland. Assessed the economic merit of the return to rate base regulation in Maryland using stochastic modeling techniques. Represented Avista, Portland General E...

AI summary The text outlines energy-related projects and analyses, including offshore wind development, fuel price forecasting, cogeneration feasibility studies, and integrated resource planning (IRP). It involves multiple organizations, regulatory bodies, and market evaluations across regions like Maryland, New England, and PJM, focusing on economic assessments, competitive impacts, and long-term resource strategies.

Approach to Updated Avoided Costs - NS Power proposes to use annual avoided fuel costs rather than levelized avoided fuel costs, using the annual values from the last two IRPs. For avoided capacity, NS Power has proposes to use the 2014 IR...

AI summary NS Power proposes using annual avoided fuel costs from recent IRPs and 2014 avoided capacity costs. A new IRP, directed by UARB, will update long-term planning for DSM (2023-2026). Current system data (lower marginal costs, renewables, self-generation) challenges reliance on 2014 IRP values.

Updated Avoided Fuel Costs - Recommend use of annual avoided fuel costs from IRP studies - 2011-2014 from the 2009 IRP. - 2015-2033 from the 2014 IRP. - The IRP calculates the difference in Partial Revenue Requirements (PRR) using Strategi...

AI summary The document recommends using annual avoided fuel costs from IRP studies (2009 for 2011-2014, 2014 for 2015-2033). PRR calculations consider DSM effects, including fuel, purchased power, and capital costs. NSPI confirmed new resource costs are amortized over their lifetime, as requested by UARB in a March 6, 2017 letter.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-12: Section 10.2 of E1's Application discusses the inclusion of CO2 emissions in cost-effectiveness screening. If a suitable methodology for counting the value of CO2 emissions in cost- effectiveness screening i...

AI summary E1 (EfficiencyOne) responds to requests regarding CO2 emissions in cost-effectiveness screening for its DSM Plan. It will consider updating 2020-2022 projections but will not include CO2 costs in annual reports due to lack of verified customer or utility avoided costs. E1 emphasizes unit cost metrics as the most accurate performance measure, noting actual savings and spending inform future screening exercises like the 2023-2025 DSM plan.

3 PROGRAM CALCULATIONS

AI summary This section discusses program calculations related to Demand Side Management (DSM) and Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), involving Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), Nova Scotia Power (NSP), and EfficiencyOne (E1), with considerations for consumer advocacy and prevalence metrics.

3.1.2 APPLIANCE RETIREMENT

AI summary Section 3.1.2 discusses appliance retirement programs under Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and EfficiencyOne (E1), with topics focusing on appliance retirement policies and their implications for demand-side management (DSM) and integrated resource planning (IRP).

4 RESIDENTIAL - EXISTING RESIDENTIAL

AI summary The section focuses on existing residential energy programs in Nova Scotia, involving entities like Nova Scotia Power and Efficiency Nova Scotia. Key acronyms include DSM, IRP, and CA, with topics likely centered on residential energy management and regulatory considerations.

5 RESIDENTIAL - NEW RESIDENTIAL

AI summary The section titled '5 RESIDENTIAL - NEW RESIDENTIAL' appears to outline regulatory considerations for new residential energy initiatives in Nova Scotia. Key entities and acronyms related to energy management and stakeholder roles are referenced, though no specific arguments or detailed content are provided in the text.

6.1 BUSINESS ENERGY REBATES - MAIL-IN

AI summary Section 6.1 outlines the Business Energy Rebates program administered via mail-in applications. Key stakeholders include Nova Scotia Power (NSP) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), with considerations for demand-side management (DSM) and integrated resource planning (IRP). The section addresses rebate eligibility, program administration, and alignment with broader energy efficiency goals.

AVOIDED COSTS ENS is proposing to use the avoided costs prepared by NSP for the 2014 Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) when they prepare the 2020 – 2022 DSM Plan RBIA. The various input variables – such as prices, load forecast, technolog...

AI summary ENS proposes using 2014 avoided costs from NSP's IRP for the 2020–2022 DSM Plan RBIA. SBA argues that updated inputs reflecting current Nova Scotia market conditions should be used instead of outdated 2014 data.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-02: On page 5 of its Application, E1 stated, with emphasis included: The Standardized Filing Framework directs that the Preferred Resource Plan identified in Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP")...

AI summary E1 asserts that its Preferred DSM Resource Plan aligns with Nova Scotia Power's 2014 IRP until an updated IRP is approved by the NSUARB. E1 questions whether it can adjust its 2020-2022 DSM portfolio without financial penalties if future IRP analysis recommends lower DSM levels due to sector transformations and changing input factors.

3. Introduction ENSC has indicated that NSPI may be updating its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) prior to 2014. Navigant understands that ENSC requires estimates of DSM potential energy and winter peak demand savings for a 26‐year period (2...

AI summary ENSC requests DSM potential energy and winter peak demand savings estimates for 2015–2040 to update NSPI's IRP. Navigant conducted a 26-year DSM analysis, market assessment, and updated measure-level details to support the IRP process.

Considerations - We currently have long-term avoided cost estimates from the 2009 IRP Update and 2014 IRP; will soon have a new set from the 2020 IRP - Historically, the RBIA has applied the same avoided cost rates to all DSM savings in a...

AI summary The document discusses the application of avoided cost estimates from different Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) updates (2009, 2014, 2020) to Demand Side Management (DSM) savings in the Rate and Bill Impact Analysis (RBIA). Historically, the same avoided cost rates were applied to all DSM savings in a given year, but the text proposes using the IRP avoided costs specific to the program year's cost-justification. This change will not affect the 2020-2022 DSM Plan RBIA but will be implemented prior to the 2019 Historical RBIA.

Figure 11: Forecasted Annual Investment (in 2018$) by Asset Class Note: Figure does not include escalation as it is used for asset planning. Forecast investments are subject to change arising from asset health and actual utilization. Chang...

AI summary Figure 11 shows forecasted 2028 investments for Tufts Cove Unit #2, with NS Power planning to evaluate replacement options instead of sustaining capital investment, following Synapse's Generation Utilization & Optimization study recommendations. Forecasts exclude escalation and are subject to change due to asset health and currency fluctuations.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 30 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) and energy planning. It references key entities such as NSUARB, NSPI, and NSPSO, along with programs like RES and IRP. The text is redacted, with confidential information removed.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 41 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 1 neighboring Planning Coordinator Areas, transmission transfer 2 capabilities, and capacity and/or load relief from available operating 3 proce...

AI summary The 2014 IRP LOLE study confirmed NS Power's 20% PRM meets NPCC reliability criteria. NS Power updates PRM via IRP processes, verifying compliance annually. PRM ensures minimum firm generation but does not account for optimal capacity needs determined through IRP.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 46 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 1 As stated by Synapse, other considerations may dictate the most economic generating 2 capacity for the system; therefore, any surplus capacity...

AI summary Synapse argues that surplus capacity in the system does not necessarily indicate that unit retirements are optimal or feasible, as these units may provide additional value beyond generation. The optimal capacity requirement and retirement decisions should be determined through long-term planning exercises like Integrated Resource Planning (IRP).

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 56 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This redacted document is an attachment from a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives between 2020-2022. It references confidential information removed from Page 56 of 158 in the IR-05 submission, indicating sensitive content related to utility planning, interconnection processes, and regulatory oversight.

2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 70 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 1 review and refine the main drivers of resource planning requirements, such as the end-use 2 forecasting methodology for forecasting firm peak...

AI summary The text outlines resource planning requirements for NS Power, emphasizing load forecasting, evaluation of wind and ERIS resources, and planning reserve margins. It clarifies that capacity assessments meet NPCC reliability criteria, not optimal capacity, which is determined via IRP. Transmission planning includes Maritime Link and reliability standards.

3.0 Technical Analysis

AI summary The document section '3.0 Technical Analysis' outlines a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia's utility sector, referencing numerous acronyms related to energy planning, grid management, and regulatory bodies. Key entities include Nova Scotia Power Inc. and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, with topics focusing on technical infrastructure and interconnection standards.

3.2 Steady State Analysis

AI summary The section outlines the steady-state analysis for the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, focusing on system adequacy and reliability factors.

Appendix H Stability Results 2021SUM Cases 2018 10 Year System Outlook Report Appendix B Page 84 of 84 2020-2022 DSM IG IR-05 Attachment 1 Page 158 of 158 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2017 NRIS Wind Study

AI summary Appendix H presents stability results for the 2021SUM cases, referencing the 2017 NRIS Wind Study. Key entities include Nova Scotia regulatory bodies and energy programs, with topics focusing on system stability, wind energy integration, and regulatory proceedings.

2.0 BACKGROUND [11] Board approval is required under s. 79L of the PUA of any agreement for the supply of electricity efficiency and conservation activities. A mutually finalized agreement is contemplated in the PUA ; however, provision is...

AI summary E1 applied for Board approval of a DSM plan, including a Preferred Plan with $43M annual spending and energy savings, and an Alternate Scenario. NS Power opposed, arguing the plan's cost is too high, rate impacts are significant, and it doesn't align with the 2014 IRP. The Board previously directed E1 to provide alternate scenarios.

ters the Board considers appropriate. The term "affordability" is not defined in the PUA. - [24] In its decision on the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, the Board discussed how it should interpret affordability: The Board finds that the inclusion of Se...

AI summary The Board evaluates DSM spending affordability under the PUA, emphasizing a balance between short-term rate impacts and long-term cost savings. It rejects exclusive focus on short-term affordability, citing potential harm to ratepayers. The 2016-2018 DSM Plan's spending was deemed affordable despite being lower than prior years and the 2014 IRP recommendations, aligning with ratepayers' best interests.

3.8 DSM Advisory Group - [56] The Consensus Agreement noted that the existing DSMAG will develop revised Terms of Reference that will enhance the development of future DSM applications including: - 7. The existing DSMAG will develop revise...

AI summary The Consensus Agreement outlines revisions to the DSM Advisory Group's Terms of Reference, emphasizing stakeholder engagement, affordability criteria, and long-term planning. E1 and NS Power committed to including Mi'kmaq representation, which the Board approved. Key issues include updated avoided cost methodologies, DSM plan timelines, and joint filing formats.

4.0 THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - [60] Under its proposed 2020-2022 DSM Plan, E1 has offered incentives for new construction multi-unit residential buildings ("MURBs") under the Custom Incentives Program. HGL raised concerns about these propo...

AI summary E1 and HGL agreed to a Settlement Agreement to address concerns about electric heat pump incentives in multi-unit residential buildings where natural gas is available. A joint study will be conducted by June 2019, with results by October 2019, funded from 2019 DSM budget. NS Power supports the agreement but disputes clauses that may restrict the existing Custom Incentive Program.

eneral Rate Application subject to UARB approval. NS Power agrees to support adoption of this methodology in a manner that does not result in additional material regulatory burden being imposed on E1. - 6. The HST Refund, together with any...

AI summary NS Power agrees to support a methodology for the HST Refund return via FAM without additional regulatory burden. DSMAG will revise terms of reference for DSM Plans, focusing on stakeholder engagement, avoided cost updates, and affordability criteria. If unresolved by June 30, 2020, UARB will determine the terms.

Request IR -5 Please provide the avoided costs used to develop the efficiency scenarios in the 2014 IRP.

AI summary The document requests the avoided costs used in the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) efficiency scenarios. Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) is the organization involved in this regulatory proceeding.

17 Future DSM Applications - 18 In the course of the presentation of evidence in these proceedings, it became apparent that a number - 19 of issues remain to be settled among stakeholders as it relates to the development of DSM Resource -...

AI summary The document outlines unresolved issues in DSM Resource Plan development, emphasizing stakeholder collaboration, revised terms of reference, and process improvements. It mentions the DSMAG's role, affordability criteria, and the HomeWarming Program's administration by EfficiencyOne. Key stakeholders include industry groups and advocates supporting the consensus agreement.

3. ISSUES

AI summary The document outlines regulatory issues related to Demand Side Management (DSM), Total Resource Cost Test (TRC), Program Administrator Cost Test (PAC), and Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) under the jurisdiction of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB). Key arguments and entities involved are not detailed in the provided text.

Appendix A 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan

AI summary Appendix A outlines the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, focusing on energy efficiency initiatives under the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) oversight. The plan involves the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) and aligns with the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) framework.

5.2.2 Enhancements in 2020-2022

AI summary Section 5.2.2 outlines regulatory enhancements in Nova Scotia from 2020-2022, focusing on demand-side management, cost allocation methodologies, and efficiency programs. Key entities include the NSUARB, ENS, and DSMAG, with acronyms related to utility regulation and energy efficiency initiatives.

4.3.64.2.6 Implementation Strategy

AI summary The section outlines the implementation strategy for demand-side management and related programs under Nova Scotia regulatory oversight, involving entities like NSUARB and ENS, with focus on cost allocation, evaluation, and compliance with regulatory tests.

5.1.6 Implementation Strategy

AI summary The section outlines the implementation strategy for demand-side management programs, involving the NSUARB and other regulatory bodies, with references to various acronyms related to energy efficiency and cost allocation methodologies.

5.2.2 Enhancements in 2020-2022

AI summary The section outlines enhancements implemented between 2020 and 2022, though specific details are not provided in the text. Key acronyms related to energy management, regulatory bodies, and programs are listed for reference.

5.2.6 Implementation Strategy

AI summary The section outlines the implementation strategy for Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, referencing regulatory bodies like NSUARB and efficiency initiatives such as ENS. Key acronyms related to cost allocation, evaluation, and regulatory processes are listed.

5.3.2 Enhancements in 2020-2022

AI summary The section outlines enhancements implemented between 2020-2022, focusing on regulatory updates and energy management initiatives in Nova Scotia. Key acronyms related to energy programs, cost tests, and regulatory bodies are defined for context.