Topic:"Integrated Resource Plan" in M10830

Figure 2: Average Rate Impacts (2011-2039) as a Result of DSM Activities in 2011-2025 - [Figure 3](#page-29-0) illustrates the annual rate effects (difference between the no-DSM scenario and the DSM - scenario for each year), assuming that...

AI summary Figure 2 and Figure 3 analyze average rate impacts from 2011-2039 due to DSM activities, highlighting that annual rate changes are influenced by DSM cost recovery and avoided cost fluctuations. The annual impacts in Figure 3 are clarified as not reflecting actual customer rate changes experienced.

4.2 OVERALL BILL IMPACTS - Generally speaking, those ratepayers that participate in DSM programs most directly benefit - from DSM programs by reducing their electricity consumption and thereby lowering their - electricity bills. Together,...

AI summary The 2022 RBIA analysis shows DSM programs reduce electricity bills for participants by -10.2% to -1.9%, while non-participants see minor savings or increases (-0.03% to +2.4%). Total customer bill impacts range from -8.9% to -1.9%, with $2.5 billion in savings for Nova Scotia ratepayers over 2011-2039. Lower-consumption classes benefit more from efficiency measures.

2022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis

AI summary The 2022 Rate and Bill Impact Analysis document outlines regulatory proceedings related to utility rate structures and customer bill impacts. Key focus areas include demand-side management, cost of service studies, and regulated business investment applications, with references to various programs and initiatives aimed at energy efficiency and carbon emission reductions.

Figure 2: Avoided Costs Sensitivity Analysis: Average Participant Bill Impacts (2011 – 2039)

AI summary Figure 2 presents a sensitivity analysis of avoided costs and their impact on average participant bills from 2011 to 2039. The analysis evaluates how variations in demand-side management (DSM) programs and other factors influence electricity costs over time.

Figure 3: Avoided Costs Sensitivity Analysis: Average Non-Participant Bill Impacts (2011 – 2039)

AI summary Figure 3 presents a sensitivity analysis of avoided costs on average non-participant electricity bills from 2011 to 2039. It evaluates impacts under different scenarios, focusing on demand-side management (DSM) and related programs, including carbon emission differences and energy rebate initiatives.

Figure 4: Avoided Costs Sensitivity Analysis: Average Total Customer Bill Impacts (2011 – 2039)

AI summary Figure 4 presents a sensitivity analysis of avoided costs and their impact on average total customer bills from 2011 to 2039. It evaluates how variations in demand-side management and other factors influence billing outcomes over time.

Appendix D: Assumptions

AI summary Appendix D outlines key assumptions for a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, referencing acronyms related to energy management, cost studies, and regulatory applications. It provides context for terms like DSM, COSS, and RBIA, which are central to the proceeding's analysis.

Methodology for determination of changes in NS Power's base cost rates as a result of DSM-induced changes in class usage and total system costs November 27, 2020

AI summary The document outlines a methodology to assess how Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives impact NS Power's base cost rates by analyzing changes in class usage and total system costs. It emphasizes regulatory considerations for adjusting rates based on DSM-induced shifts in energy consumption patterns.

Overview of Spreadsheet Calculations

AI summary The document provides an overview of spreadsheet calculations used in a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding, likely related to energy efficiency programs, cost studies, and demand-side management initiatives. Key entities include regulatory bodies, efficiency programs, and technical acronyms relevant to electricity generation and distribution.

Changes in total Revenue Requirement

AI summary Analysis of changes in total revenue requirement, focusing on cost of service studies (COSS) and regulated business investment applications (RBIA). Key considerations include demand-side management (DSM), efficiency programs, and regulatory proceedings impacting Nova Scotia's energy sector.

5. AVOIDED COSTS - Synapse asserted that, "a "no DSM" case is necessary for accurate R&BIA modeling. NSPI is in the - process of updating the 2020 IRP to reflect the impacts of recently adopted legislation and other - changes. As part of t...

AI summary Synapse argues a 'no DSM' case is essential for accurate R&BIA modeling, requesting NSPI updates to the 2020 IRP and DSMAG involvement. NS Power states it will analyze DSM scenarios and calculate avoided costs post-Evergreen IRP, not within its scope. E1 supports Synapse's request for a 'no-DSM' case and DSMAG engagement.

EOne Response In response to Synapse's comments about the rate classes with higher rate increases, EOne stated that it seeks to maximize participation to provide bill savings from DSM to offset rate impacts and that it will work towards th...

AI summary EOne supports Synapse's requests to include a 'no-DSM' case in the 2020 IRP Update and engage DSMAG on IRP development. It emphasizes DSM's role in offsetting rate increases through customer engagement and program design. EOne agrees to refine the RBIA model, clarify scenarios, and align with NS Power on DSM comparisons with clean energy resources. It also aligns with Synapse and the CA on reducing historical RBIA filings.