Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Intervenor Participation" in M12661

Matter: Nova Scotia Power - Application for approval of an Above-the-Line Tariff applicable to Port Hawkesbury Paper (PHP)
3 passages 3 documents

Intervenor Participation across all matters →

N-6NSPI (IG) RIR 1 to 31 - Redacted 1 passage
NSPI Responses to Industrial Group Information Requests p. p. 57
NSPI Responses to Industrial Group Information Requests 1 Request IR-25: 2 additional Operating and Maintenance costs, service charges and Administration 3 & General compensation." [emphasis added] 4 5 • With respect to Optional Generation...

AI summary NSPI responds to the Industrial Group's request regarding Operating and Maintenance costs, service charges, and administration. It explains the GRLF Tariff's charge structure and notes that infrastructure investment costs are not recovered under this rate. The response also mentions the need to evaluate Priority Interruptible service and its cost recovery.

N-25Evidence - Bowman Economic Consulting (IG) 1 passage
Utility Proceeding Work Performed Bef
Utility Proceeding Work Performed Before Client Year Oral Testimony Efficiency One M12228 Benefit-Cost Test Analysis, Preparation of Intervenor Evidence NSEB Industrial Group (IG) 2025 Yes Nova Scotia Power 2025 GRA Analysis, Support of In...

AI summary The table lists various utilities, proceedings, and work performed by different entities before regulatory bodies. It includes details such as the utility, proceeding, work performed, the body before which the work was done, the client, year, and whether oral testimony was provided.

20260921-1Hearing Transcript — 09/21/2026 (MICHAEL WILLETT, ERIC FERGUSON, CRAIG MOWATT, DAVID STANFORD) 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA POWER PANEL 245 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NOVA SCOTIA POWER PANEL 245 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) interruptible service. And they're further being proposed to be compensated for being first in line among the other interruptible customers, other than the GLF and Shore Power. Q. Okay. And th...

AI summary The discussion focuses on interruptible service compensation for Port Hawkesbury Paper, including a proposed 10 percent premium. The record lacks current justification for this premium, though past Board decisions approved similar arrangements. The conversation is interrupted due to time constraints and procedural flags.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →