41 NSEB Decision, M12412, February 25, 2026, p.20. 875 that circumstance, the variance is subject to a further reasonableness review by the NSEB. IESO 922 fees for market participants via a fee recovery mechanism. IESO Nova Scotia's propos...
AI summary The text discusses the jurisdiction of the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) under section 29 of the MAEA, as raised by counsel for the Province of Nova Scotia. IESO Nova Scotia is concerned about the potential disallowance of costs and emphasizes the importance of the Board determining its jurisdiction early in the regulatory process to avoid significant impacts on its operations.
44 ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board [2006] 1 SCR 140 (" ATCO, 2006 "), at paras. 35 and 38. 954 IESO Nova Scotia submits that ATCO, 2006 has been consistently followed by Courts and 988 989 990 clear intent...
AI summary The text references the ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board) [2006] 1 SCR 140 case, highlighting its consistent application by courts. It discusses the legislature's intent and the preservation of legislative coherence. Section 29 of the MAEA is mentioned in relation to expenditure and revenue processes.
1344 Accordingly, IESO Nova Scotia respectfully requests that the Board: 1345 1. Approve IESO Nova Scotia's 2026/27 revenue requirement in the amount of $14,850,121; 1341 language, structure, and purpose of the MAEA and with analogous trea...
AI summary IESO Nova Scotia requests the Board to approve its 2026/27 revenue requirement, approve a new deferral and variance mechanism, and determine the scope of its jurisdiction under subsection 29(4) of the MAEA, emphasizing the importance of these decisions for its operations.