Topic:"Jurisdictional Questions" in M12770

ncorrect large assessment value. (B) 2025 NOTICE OF CONTINUED APPEAL FORM (attached PAGE 6 of 18). Faxed to The Recorder at the following number, 1-902-893w5809, on Saturday, June 28, 2025 at 7:23pm. Again, please go to your PVSC Nova Scot...

AI summary The text describes a property owner's frustration with the assessment appeal process, noting a significant discrepancy in property values between their property and a neighboring one. The owner has submitted multiple appeals and received no response for over 23 weeks, and a hearing has been scheduled for January 27, 2026.

I am appealing my property assessme ent on the following grounds (attach - 'AT / ME / 100e

AI summary The individual is appealing their property assessment, citing specific grounds for the appeal. The appeal is related to the assessment account number and involves the Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Tribunal.

MY PROPERTY REPORT Use the AAN and PIN number on the front page of this Notice to see more information about your property on My Property Report at pysc.ca [Draft] Now Dec, 2025 and we have yet to receive a response to our "2025 Notice of...

AI summary The document is a property assessment appeal from Patricia Morris - Milosek and Dennis Milosek, challenging the 2025 assessed value of their property, which they argue is incorrectly located and overvalued. They reference the incorrect location on Google Maps and compare their property to a neighboring property with a much lower assessed value.

RE: NOTICE OF HEARING OF AN ASSESSMENT APPEAL ASSESSMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER JUR: 64 YEAR: 2025 PROPERTY LOCATION Further to earlier correspondence, which acknowledged receipt of your Notice of Continued appeal, your hearing date, time, and tel...

AI summary A notice of hearing for an assessment appeal has been issued by the Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Tribunal (NSAAT), setting the hearing for January 27, 2026. The notice outlines procedures for participation, including teleconference details, evidence submission requirements, and consequences for non-attendance.

Donna Marie MacLean, Recorder Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Tribunal Assessment Account Number: 11098 3029 I (please print) , withdraw my 20 appeal. Dated this day of , 20, Signature 3193 7721 5670 0386

AI summary This document is a form used by Donna Marie MacLean, Recorder of the Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Tribunal, to withdraw an appeal related to property assessment account number 11098. The form includes fields for the appellant's name, date, and signature.

Property Location 2025 Municipality 012726A Owner / Agent 2026-lan-27 Appellant if different Yes Position Received Court Assessor 5. A Muni cipality of the County of inverness Dennis Milosek and P atricia Morris-Milosek Yes No Charlene Mac...

AI summary This document contains a property assessment valuation summary for a property located in the Municipality of Inverness, Nova Scotia. The owner is Dennis Milosek and Patricia Morris-Milosek, and the appellant is Charlene MacPhail. The assessment details are presented in a table format.

Response The 2025 initial appeal was reduced from $55,000 to $24,000 to recognize the oceanview is obstructed by trees. Classification was adjusted from residential taxable to resource taxable. As per case law the assessment of neighbourin...

AI summary The 2025 initial appeal was reduced from $55,000 to $24,000 due to tree obstruction affecting the ocean view. The property's classification was changed from residential taxable to resource taxable, with valuation based on the Assessment Act, emphasizing market value and uniform taxation.

Case Law Nova Scotla v. Doucette (1992) - (1) The assessments of neighbouring properties are not proof of market value. (2) The appellant must prove that the assessment is higher than the actual cash value. Nova Scotla v. Knickle (2007) -...

AI summary This section of the document outlines key legal precedents related to property assessments in Nova Scotia. It references cases such as Nova Scotla v. Doucette (1992), Nova Scotla v. Knickle (2007), and Montreal v. Sun Life (1951), discussing the burden of proof in assessment appeals and factors considered in determining market value.

1601 Lower. Water Street, Suite 300 PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Hallfax, Nova Scotia ── B3J 3S3 Tel: 902-424-4448 Fax: 902-424-3919 /Email: [email protected] IN THE MATTER OF: An appeal under Section 86 of the Assessment Act by: Dennis Milosek...

AI summary This document outlines an appeal under Section 86 of the Assessment Act by Dennis Milosek and Patricia Horris-Hilosek. It includes their contact information and the nature of the proceeding.

NOTICE OF APPEAL T AKE NOTICE that the Appellant(s) appeal from a decision of the Nova Scotia ent Appeal Tribunal (NSAAT) made the ZF day of Jan , 20 Z6 and mail ed by the Recorder to the Appellant(s) on the Z5 day of FEB , 20 Z6 ig proper...

AI summary This notice of appeal challenges a decision by the Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Tribunal regarding the assessment of a property owned by Dennis Kilosek and Patricia Morris-Milosek in the County of Inverness. The appeal includes claims that the assessment is too high, the classification is wrong, and there is incorrect ownership. The appellant requests a teleconference hearing to further express concerns.

ALUE: $24,000 Appellants Dennis Milosek and Patricia Mllosek attended the appeal agreed to by parties by teleeonference and presented wr1tten and verbal grounds of appeal of the subject property. The subject property is lneorreetly looated...

AI summary The Appellants, Dennis Milosek and Patricia Mllosek, appeal the assessment of their property, arguing that it is incorrectly located, classified, and assessed at $24,000. They claim the property should be classified as farmland and grazing land, has no ocean view, and lacks essential utilities and access. The Assessor, Ms. Charlene MacPhall, defended the assessment, noting the property is a vacant lot with an obstructed ocean view and was assessed based on the state of assessment as of January 1, 2024.

Email: [email protected] BETWEEN: The Director ORRIS-MILOSEK PATRICIA and - r of Assessment and - E COUNTY OF INVERNESS APPELLANT(S) RESPONDENTS INFORMATIO N PRE-HEARING Year(s) of Appeal: 20 Value Under Appeal (pe CAP Eligible: No er s. 68 A...

AI summary This document is an email related to an appeal filed with the Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Tribunal (NSAAT) concerning an assessment of property in Inverness County. The appeal was allowed, and the assessed value was adjusted to $24,000. The case involves the Director of Assessment and Patricia Orris-Milos ek as the appellant, with Dennis Morris-Milos ek and Charlene MacPhail representing the respondents.

Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal Trlbun.11 AsSe$$ment Aecount Number- NSAA T DECISION: DISMISSED: X CONFIRMED VALUE: $24,000 Appellants Dennis Milosek and Patricia Mllosek attended the appeal agreed to by parties by teleeonference and present...

AI summary The appeal by Dennis and Patricia Milosek regarding the property assessment was dismissed. The Appellants argued the property was incorrectly classified and assessed at $24,000, claiming it should be valued at $1,000 due to its lack of utilities and features. The Assessor clarified that the responsibility lies with the Appellants to correct registration issues and noted the purchase was not an open market transaction.

sessment of $24,000. The Appellants purchased the subject property from neighbours August 8th 2024. This purchase Is not en erms length sale which is not an open market sale under the Assessment Act. A description of the subject property i...

AI summary The Appellants purchased a vacant lot in August 2024, which was assessed at $24,000 after being reduced from $55,000 due to an obstructed ocean view. The Assessor provided three comparable sales to support the assessed value, and the Tribunal is being asked to confirm the value.