Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Jurisdictional Questions" in M13083

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - CI C0068718 – IT - DERMS Solution Project - $2,965,414
2 passages 1 document

Jurisdictional Questions across all matters →

N-2NSPI (NSEB) RIR 1 to 5 2 passages
Qualitative Assessment p. p. 64
Qualitative Assessment Criteria Assessment Rationale Jurisdiction Example The California Public Utilities Commission commissioned an Electrification Impacts Study, using data disaggregation techniques to identify EV charging demand and for...

AI summary The qualitative assessment discusses examples from California and Ontario where electrification impacts studies were conducted to identify and forecast EV charging demand at the feeder level, using data disaggregation techniques and grid innovation funds.

Jurisdictions and/or Utilities Selected and Rationale p. p. 78
Jurisdictions and/or Utilities Selected and Rationale Rationale for Selection Jurisdictions Market Context Geographic/ Climate Context Strong Infrastructure / Programs Recognized Leader Vermont Qs 1-7 Oregon Qs 1-7 Manitoba Qs 1-7 Maine Qs...

AI summary The document outlines jurisdictions and utilities selected for analysis, with rationale based on research questions. Key regions include Vermont, Oregon, Manitoba, Maine, Ontario, Newfoundland Hydro, Hydro-Québec, New York (Con Edison), California (PG&E), and Hawaii (HECO). Selection criteria include market context, geographic/climate factors, infrastructure, and leadership in energy initiatives.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →