Topic:"Legal Procedures" in M12273

From: Painting-MacLean, Kimberly To: Painting-MacLean, Kimberly Subject: M12273 Administrative Demand for Structural Redress – NSUARB Oversight Failure and NS Power Identity Breach Date: May 23, 2025 10:11:33 AM Attachments: Administrative...

AI summary An administrative demand for structural redress is made regarding NSUARB oversight failures and an NS Power identity breach. The email, sent to Nova Scotia provincial officials, references attachments including NSERBT decisions and formal responses related to matters M11099 and M11411, highlighting concerns over regulatory compliance and contractual structures.

ficer of the Province of Nova Scotia Tim Houston acting as President of the Province of Nova Scotia Becky Druhan acting as Minister of Justice and Attorney General for the Province of Nova Scotia Please find attached an Administrative Dema...

AI summary An administrative demand for structural redress is filed against Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) for using unconscionable contracting mechanisms and the Nova Scotia Energy and Regulatory Boards Tribunal (NSERBT) for governance failures. The claim cites unlawful contract formation under Regulation 2.2, NSERBT’s procedural inaction, and systemic administrative failure confirmed by an identity breach. The petitioner requests formal review and accountability from the Executive Council Office.

, start 4 date, finish date, and percentage completion. If no progress is made from one month 5 to the next, this should also be clearly indicated along with the reasons. 6 3. A separate chart is to be provided in the Incident Report which...

AI summary The NSEB is required to report on progress tracking, including a Gantt chart of system restoration timelines and impacted Board matters. The Premier of Nova Scotia directed the NSEB to investigate NSP’s billing practices, consumer protections, system restoration timelines, financial relief options for customers, and potential financial penalties. The Company will provide vendor dues information by early February 2026.

ower believes it is entitled to unilaterally designate information it may file as “Board Confidential” and expects that this claimed status will be accepted without review or question. • As the regulator, the Board must be able to access a...

AI summary NS Power claims unilateral authority to designate information as 'Board Confidential' without review. The Board counters that it must access internal/external resources, including technical advisors, which NS Power's restrictions would hinder, citing s. 15 of the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

2025 M12273 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended, and IN THE MATTER OF: A Board Inquiry into Nova Scotia Power’s Cybersecurity Incident NOTICE OF INTERVENTION Danielle Frase...

AI summary A Notice of Intervention is filed by Danielle Fraser, represented by MacGillivray Law Office, seeking intervenor status in a proceeding related to Nova Scotia Power’s 2025 cybersecurity incident. The notice highlights the relevance of findings from this proceeding (M12273) to a proposed class action concerning data breaches and billing issues, with over 12,563 affected customers.

AFFIDAVIT I, ElisaAkcakiryan, of the City of Halifax Regional Municipality, in the Province ofNova Scotia, make oath and give evidence as follows: 1. I am an Articled Clerk with MacGillivray Law Office Incorporated ("MacGillivray Law"). I...

AI summary An affidavit from Elisa Akcakiryan of MacGillivray Law supports a Notice of Intervention for Danielle Fraser's class action against Nova Scotia Power, filed in December 2025. The class action overlaps with the Board's investigation, and Akcakiryan's role involved receiving complaints but not verifying their accuracy.

y Incident This is Exhibit "A" referred to in the Affidavit of Elisa Akcakiryan, Sworn before me on this 20 th day of January, 2026. eriann con-Mantolino arrister and Solicitor for the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia court Administration DEC...

AI summary A legal action initiated by Danille Fraser against Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSP) is detailed in this notice of action. The plaintiff references an affidavit and court procedures, with a deadline for the defendant to file a notice of defence. The case is before the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, with procedural details outlined.

g the action To defend the action, you or your counsel must file a notice of defence with the court no more than the followi ng number of days after the day this notice of action is delivered to you: • 15 days if delivery is made in Nova S...

AI summary The document outlines procedural requirements for defending a court action, including deadlines based on delivery location, consequences of non-defense, and rules for filing documents. It specifies the plaintiff's designated address and references Rule 57 of Civil Procedure, which does not apply to this action.

rties agree de livery is not required, or a judge orders it is not required. Contact information The plaintiff designates the following address: MacGillivray Law 5777 West Street Halifax NS B3K 1H9 Documents delivered to this address are c...

AI summary A class proceeding is initiated under the Class Proceedings Act, with MacGillivray Law representing the plaintiff. The trial is proposed in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and contact details for the plaintiff are provided. The document includes a prothonotary's certificate confirming filing on December 5, 2025.

ch recognizes the Plaintiff as a "consumer" and NSP a "supplier', thereunder. 44. NSP engaged in "unfair practices'', as defined in the CPA, including (but not necessarily limited to): (a) making misleading representations regarding billin...

AI summary The Plaintiff alleges NSP engaged in unfair practices under the CPA, including misleading billing and inadequate system security. NSP is accused of breaching statutory duties under the Public Utilities Act and PIPEDA by issuing incorrect invoices, failing to maintain billing integrity, and mishandling personal information.

ity, implement policies and practices to give effect to privacy protections, and prevent unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, harvesting, use, or modification of personal information. 50. NSP failed to comply with these non-optional s...

AI summary NSP is accused of failing to protect customer data under PIPEDA and the Public Utilities Act, leading to a breach and claims of negligence. The Plaintiff alleges unjust enrichment from overcharging customers and unconscionable conduct due to NSP's monopoly power and exploitation of consumer vulnerabilities.

s imbalance by shifting the burden of its system failures onto Nova Scotia consumers. 59. The Plaintiff states that NS P's conduct in this regard entitling her to damages and other relief. VI. DAMAGES AND LOSS 60. The Plaintiff states that...

AI summary The plaintiff alleges NSP, as a regulated monopoly, breached legal and statutory obligations, causing overpayment, financial hardship, emotional distress, and identity theft risks. Relief sought includes class certification, declarations of breaches, and damages (general, aggravated, punitive).

d damages; (f) punitive damages; (g) prejudgment interest; (h) costs; and (i) any such further and other relief as this Honourable Court deems just. Signature Dated at New Glasgow, this 5 th day of December, 2025. / . - JAMIE MACGILLIVRAY...

AI summary A legal document outlines damages sought in a court case, including punitive damages, prejudgment interest, costs, and other relief. The plaintiff is represented by Jamie MacGillivray of MacGillivray Injury & Insurance Law, based in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

t’s concerns require judicial determination and cannot be adequately addressed through this Board proceeding, regardless of the thoroughness of the Board's regulatory review. CONSUMER ADVOCATE'S ROLE After hearing from the Consumer Advocat...

AI summary The entity withdraws from the Board proceeding, emphasizing that judicial remedies for customer claims are outside the Board's jurisdiction. It highlights the complementary roles of regulatory oversight and judicial proceedings, noting NSP's objection to client participation in the regulatory process. The Consumer Advocate's role in representing consumer interests is acknowledged.